e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From To
Commission file number 1-14122
D.R. Horton, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-2386963 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
301 Commerce Street, Suite 500, Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
76102 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(817) 390-8200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common stock, $.01 par value 317,937,769 shares as of January 28, 2010
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
-2-
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Adjusted-Note A) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,904.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,922.8 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress and finished homes |
|
|
1,380.7 |
|
|
|
1,446.6 |
|
Residential land and lots developed and under development |
|
|
1,621.9 |
|
|
|
1,643.3 |
|
Land held for development |
|
|
572.7 |
|
|
|
562.5 |
|
Land inventory not owned |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,584.8 |
|
|
|
3,666.7 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
381.7 |
|
|
|
293.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation allowance of $915.2 million
and $1,073.9 million
at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
447.1 |
|
|
|
433.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,442.6 |
|
|
|
6,444.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249.5 |
|
|
|
312.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,692.1 |
|
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
173.5 |
|
|
$ |
216.8 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
957.1 |
|
|
|
932.0 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,910.0 |
|
|
|
3,076.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,040.6 |
|
|
|
4,225.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
Mortgage repurchase facility |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
130.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,102.9 |
|
|
|
4,356.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note K) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.10 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 321,529,419
shares issued and 317,874,186 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 321,136,119 shares issued and
317,480,886 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,880.0 |
|
|
|
1,871.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
793.3 |
|
|
|
613.2 |
|
Treasury stock, 3,655,233 shares at December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009, at cost |
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,580.8 |
|
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,589.2 |
|
|
|
2,400.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,692.1 |
|
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-3-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sales |
|
$ |
1,108.2 |
|
|
$ |
885.8 |
|
Land/lot sales |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,108.9 |
|
|
|
900.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sales |
|
|
918.8 |
|
|
|
748.7 |
|
Land/lot sales |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920.6 |
|
|
|
816.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sales |
|
|
189.4 |
|
|
|
137.1 |
|
Land/lot sales |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(56.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188.3 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
127.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
Gain on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Other (income) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(58.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net of recourse and reinsurance expense |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(149.2 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-4-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Amortization of debt discounts and fees |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on early retirement of debt, net |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in construction in progress and finished homes |
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
131.2 |
|
Decrease in residential land and lots developed, under development,
and held for development |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
23.8 |
|
(Increase) decrease in income taxes receivable |
|
|
(88.6 |
) |
|
|
621.7 |
|
Decrease in mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
147.9 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(151.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
817.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(233.7 |
) |
|
|
(277.5 |
) |
Proceeds from stock associated with certain employee benefit plans |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(240.7 |
) |
|
|
(289.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
525.8 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,957.3 |
|
|
|
1,387.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,936.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,913.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-5-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
December 31, 2009
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited, consolidated financial statements include the accounts of D.R.
Horton, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned, majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries (which are
referred to as the Company, unless the context otherwise requires), as well as certain variable
interest entities of which the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. All significant
intercompany accounts, transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of
filing these financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 2,
2010. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring accruals and
the asset impairment charges, loss reserves and deferred tax asset valuation allowance discussed
below) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These financial statements
do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements
and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Reclassifications/Revisions
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years financial statements to conform
to classifications used in the current year. In accordance with the authoritative guidance issued
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for noncontrolling interests which was adopted
in the current quarter, the balance sheet at September 30, 2009 has been revised to present
minority interests (now referred to as noncontrolling interests) as a component of equity rather
than as a liability. The balance sheet at September 30, 2009 has also been revised to reflect the
change in accounting for convertible debt as described below. Additionally, the statement of cash
flows for the three months ended December 31, 2008 has been revised to reflect the reclassification
of homebuilding restricted cash from other assets to restricted cash and the reclassification of
insurance receivables from a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities to other assets.
Change in Accounting Principle
On October 1, 2009, the Company adopted and applied retrospectively the FASBs authoritative
guidance for accounting for debt with conversion options, which specifies that issuers of such
instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will
reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in
subsequent periods. Early adoption of this authoritative guidance was not permitted. As a result,
the prior year consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the effects
of this change in accounting for the Companys 2% convertible senior notes issued in May 2009. See
Note D for additional information on the application of this accounting principle.
Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry has experienced seasonal fluctuations; therefore, the
operating results for the three-month period ended December 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
-6-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
Business
The Company is a national homebuilder that is engaged primarily in the construction and sale
of single-family housing in 73 markets and 26 states in the United States at December 31, 2009. The
Company designs, builds and sells single-family detached homes on lots it developed and on finished
lots purchased ready for home construction. To a lesser extent, the Company also builds and sells
attached homes, such as town homes, duplexes, triplexes and condominiums (including some mid-rise
buildings), which share common walls and roofs. Periodically, the Company sells land and lots. The
Company also provides title agency and mortgage financing services, principally to its homebuyers.
The Company generally does not retain or service the mortgages that it originates but, rather,
seeks to sell the mortgages and related servicing rights to third-party purchasers.
NOTE B INVENTORY IMPAIRMENTS AND LAND OPTION COST WRITE-OFFS
At December 31, 2009, when the Company performed its quarterly inventory impairment analysis,
the assumptions utilized reflected the stabilizing conditions experienced in many of its markets as
indicated by the improvements in the Companys operating results for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, as well as the Companys expectation of continued challenging conditions in the
homebuilding industry and in its markets. The impairment evaluation indicated communities with a
combined carrying value of $484.0 million as of December 31, 2009 had indicators of potential
impairment and these communities were evaluated for impairment. The analysis of the large majority
of these communities assumed that sales prices in future periods will be equal to or lower than
current sales order prices in each community, or in comparable communities, in order to generate an
acceptable absorption rate. For a minority of communities that the Company does not intend to
develop or operate in current market conditions, slight increases over current sales prices were
assumed. While it is difficult to determine a timeframe for a given community in the current market
conditions, the remaining lives of these communities were estimated to be in a range from six
months to in excess of ten years. In performing this analysis, the Company utilized a range of
discount rates for communities of 14% to 20%, which is consistent with the rates used in fiscal
2009. Through this evaluation process, it was determined that communities with a carrying value of
$5.3 million as of December 31, 2009 were impaired. As a result, during the three months ended
December 31, 2009, impairment charges of $1.7 million were recorded to reduce the carrying value of
the impaired communities to their estimated fair value, as compared to $55.1 million in the same
period of the prior year. In the three months ended December 31, 2009, approximately 63% of the
impairment charges were recorded to residential land and lots and land held for development, and
approximately 37% of the charges were recorded to construction in progress and finished homes
inventory, compared to 62% and 38%, respectively, in the same period of 2008.
The Companys estimate of undiscounted cash flows from communities analyzed may change and
could result in a future need to record impairment charges to adjust the carrying value of these
assets to their estimated fair value. There are several factors which could lead to changes in the
estimates of undiscounted future cash flows for a given community. The most significant of these
include pricing and incentive levels actually realized by the community, the rate at which the
homes are sold and the costs incurred to construct the homes. The pricing and incentive levels are
often inter-related with sales pace within a community such that a price reduction can be expected
to increase the sales pace. Further, both of these factors are heavily influenced by the
competitive pressures facing a given community from both new homes and existing homes which may
result from foreclosures. If conditions in the broader economy, homebuilding industry or specific
markets in which the Company operates worsen, and as the Company re-evaluates specific community
pricing and incentives, construction and development plans, and its overall land sale strategies,
it may be required to evaluate additional communities or re-evaluate previously impaired
communities for potential impairment. These evaluations may result in additional impairment
charges.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had $14.5 million of land held for sale, consisting of land
held for development and land under development that has met the criteria of land held for sale.
During the three-month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recovered $0.5
million and wrote off $1.1 million, respectively, of earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition
costs related to land option contracts which are not expected to be acquired.
-7-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE C LAND INVENTORY NOT OWNED
In the ordinary course of its homebuilding business, the Company enters into land and lot
option purchase contracts to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Under these
contracts, the Company will fund a stated deposit in consideration for the right, but not the
obligation, to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. Under the
terms of the option purchase contracts, many of the option deposits are not refundable at the
Companys discretion.
Certain option purchase contracts result in the creation of a variable interest in the entity
holding the land parcel under option. The Company evaluates those land and lot option purchase
contracts with variable interest entities to determine whether the Company is the primary
beneficiary based upon analysis of the variability of the expected gains and losses of the entity.
The expected gains and losses are primarily determined by the amount of deposit required by the
contract, the time period or term of the contract, and by analyzing the volatility in home sales
prices as well as development and entitlement risk in each specific market. Based on this
evaluation, if the Company is the primary beneficiary of an entity with which the Company has
entered into a land or lot option purchase contract, the variable interest entity is consolidated.
The consolidation of variable interest entities added $6.1 million in land inventory not owned
and noncontrolling interests related to entities not owned to the Companys consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2009. The Companys obligations related to these land or lot option contracts
are guaranteed by deposits, including cash, promissory notes and surety bonds, totaling $0.6
million as of December 31, 2009. Creditors, if any, of these variable interest entities have no
recourse against the Company.
For the variable interest entities which are unconsolidated because the Company is not subject
to a majority of the risk of loss or entitled to receive a majority of the entities residual
returns, the maximum exposure to loss is generally limited to the amounts of the Companys option
deposits. At December 31, 2009, the amount of option deposits related to these contracts totaled
$6.6 million and is included in homebuilding other assets on the Companys consolidated balance
sheet.
Additionally, the Company determined that certain of its land and lot option purchase
contracts represent financing arrangements. As a result, the Company added $3.4 million in land
inventory not owned, with a corresponding increase to accrued expenses and other liabilities, to
its consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009.
-8-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE D NOTES PAYABLE
The Companys notes payable at their principal amounts, net of any unamortized discounts,
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.875% senior notes due 2010, net |
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
9.75% senior notes due 2010 |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
9.75% senior subordinated notes due 2010, net |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
6% senior notes due 2011, net |
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
|
212.8 |
|
7.875% senior notes due 2011, net |
|
|
156.8 |
|
|
|
163.3 |
|
5.375% senior notes due 2012 |
|
|
180.7 |
|
|
|
242.1 |
|
6.875% senior notes due 2013 |
|
|
199.5 |
|
|
|
199.5 |
|
5.875% senior notes due 2013 |
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
6.125% senior notes due 2014, net |
|
|
195.8 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
2% convertible senior notes due 2014, net (1) |
|
|
373.8 |
|
|
|
368.0 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2014, net |
|
|
234.0 |
|
|
|
248.8 |
|
5.25% senior notes due 2015, net |
|
|
268.4 |
|
|
|
298.6 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2016, net |
|
|
289.6 |
|
|
|
298.3 |
|
6.5% senior notes due 2016, net |
|
|
458.4 |
|
|
|
497.0 |
|
Other secured |
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,910.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,076.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage repurchase facility, maturing 2010 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance of the 2% convertible senior notes at September 30, 2009
has been retrospectively adjusted for the change in accounting for
convertible debt as described below. |
Homebuilding:
On October 1, 2009, the Company adopted and applied retrospectively the FASBs authoritative
guidance for accounting for debt with conversion options, which specifies that issuers of such
instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will
reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in
subsequent periods. Early adoption of this authoritative guidance was not permitted. As a result,
the prior year consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the effects
of this change in accounting for the Companys 2% convertible senior notes issued in May 2009. The
Company recorded the debt component of the convertible senior notes at its fair value on the date
of issuance of the notes, assuming no conversion features. The remaining value of the equity
component of the convertible senior notes was recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the
notes and an increase in additional paid-in capital. The reduction in the carrying value of the
notes and the fees related to the notes will be amortized as interest incurred and expensed or
capitalized to inventory over the remaining life of the notes, resulting in an effective interest
rate of 9.7%.
-9-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
The following table summarizes the effect of the change in accounting principle related to the
2% convertible senior notes on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
3,663.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,666.7 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
436.5 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
433.0 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,208.6 |
|
|
|
(132.0 |
) |
|
|
3,076.6 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,734.4 |
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
1,871.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
617.7 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
613.2 |
|
In addition, the change in accounting principle related to the 2% convertible senior notes
resulted in a decrease of $50.5 million in the net deferred income tax assets and a corresponding
decrease in the valuation allowance at September 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes the effect of the change in accounting principle related to the
2% convertible senior notes on the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
95.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
100.2 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(545.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(549.8 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
|
(1.72 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
In November 2009, the Board of Directors authorized the early repurchase of up to $500 million
of the Companys debt securities. The authorization is effective from December 1, 2009 to November
30, 2010. At December 31, 2009, $388.4 million of the authorization was remaining.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, primarily through unsolicited transactions,
the Company repurchased the following senior notes prior to their maturity dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount of
Senior Notes |
|
|
|
Repurchased |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
9.75% senior notes due 2010 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
6% senior notes due 2011 |
|
|
8.5 |
|
7.875% senior notes due 2011 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
5.375% senior notes due 2012 |
|
|
61.4 |
|
6.125% senior notes due 2014 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2014 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
5.25% senior notes due 2015 |
|
|
30.4 |
|
5.625% senior notes due 2016 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
6.5% senior notes due 2016 |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
-10-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
These senior notes were repurchased for an aggregate purchase price of $171.0 million, plus
accrued interest. The repurchases resulted in a net gain of $1.6 million, which is net of
unamortized discounts and fees written off, and is included in the consolidated statement of
operations for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
In January 2010, through unsolicited transactions, the Company repurchased $1.0 million
principal amount of its 5.875% senior notes due 2013 and $6.5 million principal amount of its 6.5%
senior notes due 2016, for an aggregate purchase price of $7.4 million, plus accrued interest.
On January 15, 2010, the Company repaid the remaining $130.9 million principal amount of its
4.875% senior notes which were due on that date.
On January 25, 2010, the Company announced that it will redeem the remaining $95.0 million
principal amount of its 5.875% senior notes due 2013 on February 24, 2010, at a redemption price of
101.958% of the face amount of the notes, plus accrued interest.
The indentures governing the Companys senior notes and senior subordinated notes impose
restrictions on the creation of secured debt and liens. At December 31, 2009, the Company was in
compliance with all of the limitations and restrictions that form a part of the public debt
obligations.
Financial Services:
The Companys mortgage subsidiary, DHI Mortgage, has a mortgage repurchase facility which
matures March 4, 2010. The mortgage repurchase facility, which is accounted for as a secured
financing, provides financing and liquidity to DHI Mortgage by facilitating purchase transactions
in which DHI Mortgage transfers eligible loans to the counterparties against the transfer of funds
by the counterparties, thereby becoming purchased loans. DHI Mortgage then has the right and
obligation to repurchase the purchased loans upon their sale to third-party purchasers in the
secondary market or within specified time frames from 45 to 120 days in accordance with the terms
of the mortgage repurchase facility. The capacity of the mortgage repurchase facility is $100
million, with a provision allowing an increase in the capacity to $125 million during the last five
business days of a fiscal quarter and the first seven business days of the following fiscal
quarter.
As of December 31, 2009, $158.5 million of mortgage loans held for sale were pledged under the
repurchase arrangement. These mortgage loans had a collateral value of $148.6 million. DHI Mortgage
has the option to fund a portion of its repurchase obligations in advance. As a result of advance
paydowns totaling $142.4 million, DHI Mortgage had an obligation of $6.2 million outstanding under
the mortgage repurchase facility at December 31, 2009 at a 4.5% interest rate.
The mortgage repurchase facility is not guaranteed by either D.R. Horton, Inc. or any of the
subsidiaries that guarantee the Companys homebuilding debt. The facility contains financial
covenants as to the mortgage subsidiarys minimum required tangible net worth, its maximum
allowable ratio of debt to tangible net worth and its minimum required liquidity. At December 31,
2009, the mortgage subsidiary was in compliance with all of the conditions and covenants of the
mortgage repurchase facility.
In the past, the Company has been able to renew or extend its mortgage credit facilities on
satisfactory terms prior to their maturities, and obtain temporary additional commitments through
amendments to the credit agreements during periods of higher than normal volumes of mortgages held
for sale. The liquidity of the Companys financial services business depends upon its continued
ability to renew and extend the mortgage repurchase facility or to obtain other additional
financing in sufficient capacities. The Company is currently exploring alternatives with regard to
the renewal or replacement of this facility.
NOTE E HOMEBUILDING INTEREST
The Company capitalizes homebuilding interest costs to inventory during active development and
construction. Capitalized interest is charged to cost of sales as the related inventory is
delivered to the buyer. Additionally, the
-11-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
Company writes off a portion of the capitalized interest related to communities for which
inventory impairments are recorded. Due to the decrease in the size of the Companys operations,
its inventory under active development and construction was lower than its debt level at December
31, 2009 and 2008. Therefore, a portion of the interest incurred was expensed directly to interest
expense as reflected below.
The following table summarizes the Companys homebuilding interest costs incurred,
capitalized, expensed as interest expense, charged to cost of sales and written off during the
three-month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Capitalized interest, beginning of period (1) |
|
$ |
128.8 |
|
|
$ |
160.6 |
|
Interest incurred |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
Interest expensed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directly to interest expense |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
Amortized to cost of sales |
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
Written off with inventory impairments |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest, end of period |
|
$ |
119.9 |
|
|
$ |
157.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The beginning balance of capitalized interest for the three-month
period ended December 31, 2009 has been retrospectively adjusted for
the change in accounting for convertible debt as described in Note D. |
NOTE F MORTGAGE LOANS
To manage the interest rate risk inherent in its mortgage operations, the Company hedges its
risk using various derivative instruments, which include forward sales of mortgage-backed
securities (MBS), Eurodollar Futures Contracts (EDFC) and put options on both MBS and EDFC. Use of
the term hedging instruments in the following discussion refers to these securities collectively,
or in any combination. The Company does not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or
speculative purposes.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of single-family residential loans
collateralized by the underlying property. Newly originated loans that have been closed but not
committed to third-party purchasers are hedged to mitigate the risk of changes in their fair value.
Hedged loans are committed to third-party purchasers typically within three days after origination.
At December 31, 2009, mortgage loans held for sale had an aggregate fair value of $164.7 million
and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $163.5 million. During the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had net gains on sales of loans of $11.8 million and $7.3
million, respectively, which includes the effect of recording recourse expense, as discussed below
in Other Mortgage Loans, of $2.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
The notional amounts of the hedging instruments used to hedge mortgage loans held for sale
vary in relationship to the underlying loan amounts, depending on the movements in the value of
each hedging instrument relative to the value of the underlying mortgage loans. The fair value
change related to the hedging instruments generally offsets the fair value change in the mortgage
loans held for sale, which for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was not
significant, and is recognized in current earnings. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $87.6
million in mortgage loans held for sale not committed to third-party purchasers and the notional
amounts of the hedging instruments related to those loans totaled $88.0 million.
-12-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
Other Mortgage Loans
Generally, mortgage loans are sold with limited recourse provisions which include
industry-standard representations and warranties, primarily involving misrepresentation by the
borrower or other parties and, depending on the agreement, may include requiring a minimum number
of payments to be made by the borrower. The Company does not retain any other continuing interest
related to mortgage loans sold in the secondary market. Other mortgage loans generally consist of
loans repurchased due to these limited recourse obligations. Typically, these loans are impaired
and often become real estate owned through the foreclosure process.
Based on historical performance and current housing and credit market conditions, the Company
has recorded reserves for estimated losses on other mortgage loans, real estate owned, future loan
repurchase obligations due to the limited recourse provisions and losses for mortgage reinsurance
activities, all of which are recorded as reductions of financial services revenue. These reserves
totaled $42.0 million and $43.6 million at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively,
and comprise the items that follow. Other mortgage loans, subject to nonrecurring fair value
measurement, totaled $50.0 million and $50.2 million at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009,
respectively, and had corresponding loss reserves of $13.2 million and $13.1 million, respectively.
The Company has established loss reserves for real estate owned of $2.4 million and $2.6 million at
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The Companys other mortgage loans and real
estate owned are included in financial services other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. Additional loss reserves at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 included
liabilities of $26.4 million and $27.9 million, respectively, for expected losses on future loan
repurchase obligations due to the limited recourse provisions.
A subsidiary of the Company reinsured a portion of private mortgage insurance written on loans
originated by DHI Mortgage in prior years. At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, reserves
for expected future losses under the reinsurance program totaled $17.5 million and $18.7 million,
respectively. The mortgage repurchase and reinsurance loss reserves are included in financial services accounts payable and other
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. It is possible that future losses may
exceed the amount of reserves and, if so, additional charges will be required.
Loan Commitments
The Company is party to interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) which are extended to borrowers
who have applied for loan funding and meet defined credit and underwriting criteria. At December
31, 2009, IRLCs totaled $119.3 million which are accounted for as derivative instruments recorded
at fair value.
The Company manages interest rate risk related to its IRLCs through the use of best-efforts
whole loan delivery commitments and hedging instruments. These instruments are considered
derivatives in an economic hedge and are accounted for at fair value with gains and losses
recognized in current earnings. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $17.7
million of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments and $91.6 million of hedging instruments
related to IRLCs not yet committed to purchasers.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had $13.8 million in EDFC options and MBS which were
acquired as part of a program to potentially offer homebuyers a below market interest rate on their
home financing. These hedging instruments and the related commitments are accounted for at fair
value with gains and losses recognized in current earnings. These gains and losses for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were not material.
NOTE G FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company adopted the FASBs authoritative guidance for fair value measurements of financial
and non-financial instruments on October 1, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The guidance defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange (exit) price that would be received for an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This
standard establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the
-13-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. Observable inputs are those which can be
easily seen by market participants while unobservable inputs are generally developed internally,
utilizing managements estimates and assumptions.
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active, or by model-based techniques in which all significant
inputs are observable in the market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is derived from model-based techniques in which at least one
significant input is unobservable and based on the Companys own estimates about the
assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or liability. |
When available, the Company uses quoted market prices in active markets to determine fair
value. The Company considers the principal market and nonperformance risk associated with the
Companys counterparties when determining the fair value measurements, if applicable. Fair value
measurements are used for the Companys mortgage loans held for sale, IRLCs and other derivative
instruments on a recurring basis, and are used for inventories and other mortgage loans on a
non-recurring basis, when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
The value of mortgage loans held for sale includes changes in estimated fair value from the
date the loan is closed until the date the loan is sold. The fair value of mortgage loans held for
sale is generally calculated by reference to quoted prices in secondary markets for commitments to
sell mortgage loans with similar characteristics; therefore, they have been classified as a Level 2
valuation. After consideration of nonperformance risk, no additional adjustments have been made by
the Company to the fair value measurement of mortgage loans held for sale. Closed mortgage loans
are typically sold within 30 days of origination, limiting any nonperformance exposure period. In
addition, the Company actively monitors the financial strength of its counterparties and has
limited the number of counterparties utilized in loan sale transactions due to the current market
volatility in the mortgage and bank environment.
The hedging instruments utilized by the Company to manage its interest rate risk and hedge the
changes in the fair value of mortgage loans held for sale are publicly traded derivatives with fair
value measurements based on quoted market prices. Exchange-traded derivatives are considered Level
1 valuations because quoted prices for identical assets are used for fair value measurements.
Over-the-counter derivatives, such as MBS, are classified as Level 2 valuations because quoted
prices for similar assets are used for fair value measurements. The Company mitigates exposure to
nonperformance risk associated with over-the-counter derivatives by limiting the number of
counterparties and actively monitoring their financial strength and creditworthiness while
requiring them to be well-known institutions with credit ratings equal to or better than AA- or
equivalent. Further, the Companys derivative contracts typically have short-term durations with
maturities from one to four months. Accordingly, the Companys risk of nonperformance relative to
its derivative positions is also not significant. Nonperformance risk associated with
exchange-traded derivatives is considered minimal as these items are traded on the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange. After consideration of nonperformance risk, no additional adjustments have
been made to the fair value measurement of hedging instruments.
The fair values of IRLCs are also calculated by reference to quoted prices in secondary
markets for commitments to sell mortgage loans with similar characteristics; therefore, they have
been classified as Level 2 valuations. These valuations do not contain adjustments for expirations
as any expired commitments are excluded from the fair value measurement. After consideration of
nonperformance risk, no additional adjustments have been made by the Company to the fair value
measurements of IRLCs. The Company generally only issues IRLCs for products that meet specific
purchaser guidelines. Should any purchaser become insolvent, the Company would not be required to
close the transaction based on the terms of the commitment. Since not all IRLCs will become closed
loans, the Company adjusts its fair value measurements for the estimated amount of IRLCs that will
not close.
-14-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
Inventory held and used is reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. The factors considered in determining fair values of the Companys communities
are described in the discussion of the Companys inventory impairment analysis (see Note B), and
are classified as Level 3 valuations. Inventory held and used measured at fair value represents
those communities for which the Company has recorded impairments during the current period.
Land held for sale, which consists of land held for development and land under development
that has met the criteria of available for sale, is reported at the lower of carrying value or fair
value less costs to sell on a nonrecurring basis. In determining the fair values of land held for
sale, the Company considers, among other things, recent legitimate offers received, prices for land
in recent comparable sales transactions, and market analysis studies that include the estimated
price a willing buyer would pay for the land; therefore, they have been classified as Level 3
valuations.
Other mortgage loans are measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a
nonrecurring basis and include performing and nonperforming mortgage loans. The fair values of
other mortgage loans are determined based on the Companys assessment of the value of the
underlying collateral and are classified as Level 3 valuations.
The following table summarizes the Companys assets and liabilities at December 31, 2009
measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale (a) |
|
Level 2 |
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale |
|
$ |
164.7 |
|
Derivatives not Designated as
Hedging Instruments (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Lock Commitments |
|
Level 2 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
Forward Sales of MBS |
|
Level 2 |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
Best-Efforts Commitments |
|
Level 2 |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale are reflected at full fair value. Interest income earned
on mortgage loans held for sale is based on contractual interest rates and included in
financial services interest and other income. |
|
(b) |
|
Fair value measurements of these derivatives represent changes in fair value since
inception. These changes are reflected in the balance sheet and included in financial
services revenues on the consolidated statement of operations. |
The following table summarizes the Companys assets at December 31, 2009 measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Held and Used (a) |
|
Level 3 |
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Mortgage Loans (a) |
|
Level 3 |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair values included in the table above represent only those assets whose carrying
values were adjusted to fair value in the current quarter. |
-15-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values due to their
short-term nature. For senior, convertible senior and senior subordinated notes, the Company
determines fair value based on quoted market prices. The aggregate fair value of the Companys
senior notes at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 was $3,029.4 million and $3,187.6 million,
respectively, compared to carrying values of $2,872.8 million and $3,039.5 million, respectively.
The aggregate fair value of the Companys senior notes includes fair values for the 2% convertible
senior notes of $563.2 million and $568.6 million at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009,
respectively, compared to their carrying values of $373.8 million and $368.0 million, respectively.
For other secured notes and balances due under the mortgage repurchase facility, the fair values
approximate their carrying amounts due to their short maturity or floating interest rate terms, as
applicable.
NOTE H INCOME TAXES
The Companys benefit from income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was
$149.2 million compared to a provision for income taxes of $1.3 million in the comparable period of
the prior year. The benefit from income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2009 consists
of a benefit of $198.8 million from a change in tax law which expanded the number of years the
Company can carry back federal tax losses, offset by a provision for income taxes of $0.9 million
for state income taxes and an increase in the Companys reserve for unrecognized tax benefits of
$48.6 million. The change in the Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended December
31, 2009 compared to the same period of the prior year is primarily due to the change in tax law,
offset by the increase in unrecognized tax benefits during the current year.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code. This tax law change allows a
net operating loss realized in either the Companys fiscal 2008, 2009 or 2010 years to be carried
back up to five years (previously limited to a two-year carryback). The Company has elected to
carry back its fiscal 2009 net operating loss. This resulted in a benefit from income taxes of
$198.8 million and an increase in income taxes receivable in the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company had income taxes receivable of $381.7 million and $293.1 million at December 31,
2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company received $113.0 million of the $293.1
million in the form of a tax refund during October 2009. With respect to the income taxes
receivable at December 31, 2009, $358.2 million is due to federal tax losses generated in fiscal
2009 that the Company carried back against taxable income generated in fiscal 2004 and 2005. The
Company expects to receive this federal income tax refund during fiscal 2010. The remaining income
tax receivables relate to state operating loss carrybacks and an amended federal return.
At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the Company had net deferred income tax assets of
$915.2 million and $1,073.9 million, respectively, offset by valuation allowances of $915.2 million
and $1,073.9 million, respectively. Tax benefits for state net operating loss carryforwards of
$81.4 million that expire (beginning at various times depending on the tax jurisdiction) from
fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2029 are included in the amounts. Differences between the anticipated and
actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws also affect
actual tax results and the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (which includes interest, penalties, and the tax
benefit relating to the deductibility of interest and state income taxes) was $72.6 million and
$24.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The increase was a
result of the Companys election to carryback its fiscal 2009 tax losses to fiscal 2004 and 2005,
thereby fully utilizing the loss carryforwards which existed at September 30, 2009. The Company
classifies interest and penalties on income taxes as income tax expense. It is reasonably possible
that, within the next 12 months, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease as much as
$49.7 million as a result of a ruling request filed by the Company with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) concerning capitalization of inventory costs. If the IRS rules favorably on the
ruling request, the Companys unrecognized tax benefits would be reduced, resulting in a benefit
from income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations.
-16-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
The Company is subject to federal income tax and to income tax in multiple states. The statute
of limitations for the Companys major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal
years 2004 through 2010, and the Company is currently being audited by various states.
NOTE I EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the numerators and denominators used in the computation of
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, options to purchase 9.1 million shares of common
stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price
was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, their effect would
have been antidilutive. For the three months ended December 31, 2008, all outstanding stock options
were excluded from the computation of the loss per share because they were antidilutive due to the
net loss recorded during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of issuance costs
associated with convertible senior notes |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share
after assumed conversions |
|
$ |
198.8 |
|
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share
weighted average common shares |
|
|
317.7 |
|
|
|
316.7 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share
adjusted weighted average common shares |
|
|
356.1 |
|
|
|
316.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE J STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The Company has an automatically effective universal shelf registration statement filed with
the SEC in September 2009, registering debt and equity securities that the Company may issue from
time to time in amounts to be determined.
In November 2009, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of
the Companys common stock. The authorization is effective from December 1, 2009 to November 30,
2010. All of the $100 million authorization was remaining at December 31, 2009.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly
cash dividend of $0.0375 per common share, which was paid on December 15, 2009 to stockholders of
record on December 4, 2009. In January 2010, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.0375 per common share, payable on February 25, 2010 to stockholders of record on
February 16, 2010. Quarterly cash dividends of $0.0375 per common share were declared in the
comparable quarters of fiscal 2009.
In January 2010, the Companys stockholders did not approve its Section 382 rights agreement;
therefore, the rights agreement will expire by its terms on August 19, 2010 unless earlier
terminated by the Board of Directors.
-17-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE K COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Warranty Claims
The Company typically provides its homebuyers with a ten-year limited warranty for major
defects in structural elements such as framing components and foundation systems, a two-year
limited warranty on major mechanical systems, and a one-year limited warranty on other construction
components. The Companys warranty liability is based upon historical warranty cost experience in
each market in which it operates and is adjusted as appropriate to reflect qualitative risks
associated with the types of homes built and the geographic areas in which they are built.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had liabilities of $5.5 million for the repair of
approximately 90 homes in its South Florida and Louisiana markets for homes constructed during 2005
through 2007 which contain or are suspected to contain allegedly defective drywall manufactured in
China (Chinese Drywall) that may be responsible for accelerated corrosion of certain metals in the
home. The Company first learned of this potential issue during fiscal 2009 through customer
inquiries. The Company has identified these homes through a review of the supply channel for its
homes constructed in these markets and of the warranty claims received in these markets as well as
testing of specific homes. The Company is continuing its investigation to determine if there are
additional homes with the Chinese Drywall in these markets, which if found, would likely require
the Company to further increase its warranty reserve for this matter in the future. The costs
accrued to correct these homes are based on the Companys estimate of future repair costs. If the
actual costs to remediate the homes differ from the estimated costs, it may require the Company to
revise its warranty estimate.
Through investigation of its supply channels in other markets, the Company has not identified
any homes suspected of containing the Chinese Drywall outside of its Florida and Louisiana markets.
As of February 2, 2010 the Company has not been included as a defendant in any lawsuit pertaining
to the Chinese Drywall, although it is possible that it may in the future be subject to such
litigation. While the Company will seek reimbursement for these remediation costs from various
sources, it has not recorded a receivable for potential recoveries as of December 31, 2009 given
the early stage of this matter.
Changes in the Companys warranty liability during the three-month periods ended December 31,
2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Warranty liability, beginning of period |
|
$ |
59.6 |
|
|
$ |
83.4 |
|
Warranties issued |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Settlements made |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability, end of period |
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
|
$ |
73.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance and Legal Claims
The Company has been named as defendant in various claims, complaints and other legal actions
including construction defect claims on closed homes and other claims and lawsuits incurred in the
ordinary course of business, including employment matters, personal injury claims, land development
issues, contract disputes and claims related to its mortgage activities. The Company has
established reserves for these contingencies, based on the expected costs of the claims. The
Companys estimates of such reserves are based on the facts and circumstances of individual pending
claims and historical data and trends, including costs relative to revenues, home closings and
product types, and include estimates of the costs of construction defect claims incurred but not
yet reported. These reserve estimates are subject to ongoing revision as the circumstances of
individual pending claims and historical data and trends change. Adjustments to estimated reserves
are recorded in the accounting period in which the change in estimate occurs. The Companys total
liabilities for these items were $540.9 million and $534.0 million at
-18-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and are included in homebuilding
accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Related to the
contingencies for construction defect claims and estimates of construction defect claims incurred
but not yet reported, and other legal claims and lawsuits incurred in the ordinary course of
business, the Company estimates and records insurance receivables for these matters under
applicable insurance policies when recovery is probable. Additionally, the Company may have the
ability to recover a portion of its legal expenses from its subcontractors when the Company has
been named as an additional insured on their insurance policies. Estimates of the Companys
insurance receivables related to these matters totaled $240.9 million and $234.6 million at
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and are included in homebuilding other
assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Expenses related to these items were approximately $9.8
million and $7.8 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Management believes that, while the outcome of such contingencies cannot be predicted with
certainty, the liabilities arising from these matters will not have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. To the extent
the liability arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds managements estimates
reflected in the recorded reserves relating to these matters, the Company would incur additional
charges that could be significant.
On March 24, 2008, a putative class action, James Wilson, et al. v. D.R. Horton, Inc., et al.,
was filed by five customers of Western Pacific Housing, Inc., one of the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiaries, against the Company, Western Pacific Housing, Inc., and the Companys affiliated
mortgage company subsidiary, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
California. The complaint sought certification of a class alleged to include persons who, within
the four years preceding the filing of the suit, purchased a home from the Company, or any of its
subsidiaries, and obtained a mortgage for such purchase from the Companys affiliated mortgage
company subsidiary. The complaint alleged that the Company violated Section 1 of the Sherman
Antitrust Act and Sections 16720, 17200 and 17500 of the California Business and Professions Code
by effectively requiring its homebuyers to apply for a loan through its affiliated mortgage
company. In June 2009 the complaint was amended to limit the putative class to California customers
only and the claims asserted were limited to alleged violations of the California Business and
Professions Code. The complaint alleges that the homebuyers were either deceived about loan costs
charged by the Companys affiliated mortgage company or coerced into using its affiliated mortgage
company, or both, and that discounts and incentives offered by the Company or its subsidiaries to
buyers who obtained financing from its affiliated mortgage company were illusory. The action seeks
treble damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. Management believes the claims
alleged in this action are without merit and will defend them vigorously. Subsequent to December
31, 2009, the plaintiffs tentatively agreed to dismiss their lawsuit in exchange for a waiver of
costs. A final settlement agreement is pending.
Land and Lot Option Purchase Contracts
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land and lot option purchase
contracts in order to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. At December 31, 2009, the
Company had total deposits of $9.3 million, comprised of cash deposits of $7.0 million, promissory
notes of $1.5 million, and letters of credit and surety bonds of $0.8 million, to purchase land and
lots with a total remaining purchase price of $757.6 million. Within the land and lot option
purchase contracts at December 31, 2009, there were a limited number of contracts subject to
specific performance clauses which may require the Company to purchase the land or lots upon the
land sellers meeting their obligations. The remaining purchase price of these specific performance
contracts is not material. The majority of land and lots under contract are currently expected to
be purchased within three years, based on the Companys assumptions as to the extent it will
exercise its options to purchase such land and lots.
Other Commitments
In the normal course of its business activities, the Company provides standby letters of
credit and surety bonds, issued by third parties, to secure performance under various contracts. At
December 31, 2009, outstanding standby letters of credit were $50.4 million, all of which were cash
collateralized, and surety bonds were $1.0 billion. The Company has secured letter of credit
agreements with three banks that require it to deposit cash, in an amount approximating the balance
of letters of credit outstanding, as collateral with the issuing banks. At December 31,
-19-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
2009 and September 30, 2009, the amount of cash restricted for this purpose totaled $51.6
million and $53.3 million, respectively, and is included in homebuilding restricted cash on the
Companys consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE L OTHER ASSETS AND ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
The Companys homebuilding other assets at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
$ |
240.9 |
|
|
$ |
234.6 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
|
Prepaid assets (1) |
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
122.9 |
|
|
|
108.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
447.1 |
|
|
$ |
433.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance of prepaid assets at September 30, 2009 has been
retrospectively adjusted for the change in accounting for convertible
debt as described in Note D. |
The Companys homebuilding accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Construction defect and other litigation liabilities |
|
$ |
540.9 |
|
|
$ |
534.0 |
|
Employee compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
94.2 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
Warranty liability |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
Federal and state income tax liabilities |
|
|
72.8 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
141.1 |
|
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
957.1 |
|
|
$ |
932.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE M RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for accounting for transfers of
financial assets, which requires enhanced disclosures regarding transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and continuing exposure to the related risks. The guidance
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning October 1,
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance; however, it is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for consolidating variable interest
entities, which changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized
or is not controlled through
voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is
required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design
and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2010.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, which requires additional disclosures related to transfers between levels in the
hierarchy of fair value measurement.
-20-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, will not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
NOTE N SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys 31 homebuilding operating divisions and its financial services operation are its
operating segments. The homebuilding operating segments are aggregated into six reporting segments
and the financial services operating segment is its own reporting segment. The Companys reportable
homebuilding segments are: East, Midwest, Southeast, South Central, Southwest and West. These
reporting segments have homebuilding operations located in the following states:
|
|
|
East:
|
|
Delaware, Georgia (Savannah only), Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia |
|
Midwest:
|
|
Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin |
|
Southeast:
|
|
Alabama, Florida and Georgia |
|
South Central:
|
|
Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas |
|
Southwest:
|
|
Arizona and New Mexico |
|
West:
|
|
California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington |
Homebuilding is the Companys core business, generating 98% of consolidated revenues during
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Companys homebuilding segments are
primarily engaged in the acquisition and development of land and the construction and sale of
residential homes on the land, in 26 states and 73 markets in the United States. The homebuilding
segments generate most of their revenues from the sale of completed homes, with a lesser amount
from the sale of land and lots.
The Companys financial services segment provides mortgage financing and title agency services
principally to customers of the Companys homebuilding segments. The Company generally does not
retain or service the mortgages that it originates, but, rather, seeks to sell the mortgages and
related servicing rights to third-party purchasers. The financial services segment generates its
revenues from originating and selling mortgages and collecting fees for title insurance agency and
closing services.
-21-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
The accounting policies of the reporting segments are described throughout Note A in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
127.3 |
|
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
147.1 |
|
South Central |
|
|
357.8 |
|
|
|
255.0 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
137.5 |
|
West |
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
|
213.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total homebuilding revenues |
|
$ |
1,108.9 |
|
|
$ |
900.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services revenues |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
1,132.2 |
|
|
$ |
918.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
West |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory impairments |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
(10.9 |
) |
Midwest |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
Southeast |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
South Central |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
West |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
|
$ |
(58.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
(61.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-22-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 (4) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Homebuilding Inventories (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
535.4 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
359.6 |
|
|
|
371.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
626.7 |
|
|
|
656.6 |
|
South Central |
|
|
841.9 |
|
|
|
852.8 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
251.5 |
|
|
|
255.7 |
|
West |
|
|
839.8 |
|
|
|
842.5 |
|
Corporate and unallocated (3) |
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
152.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total homebuilding inventory |
|
$ |
3,584.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,666.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expenses maintained at the corporate level are allocated to each segment based on the
segments average inventory. These expenses consist primarily of capitalized interest
and property taxes, which are amortized to cost of sales, and the expenses related to
operating the Companys corporate office. |
|
(2) |
|
Homebuilding inventories are the only assets included in the measure of segment assets
used by the Companys chief operating decision maker, its CEO. |
|
(3) |
|
Corporate and unallocated consists primarily of capitalized interest and property taxes. |
|
(4) |
|
Homebuilding inventories at September 30, 2009 have been retrospectively adjusted for
the change in accounting for convertible debt as described in Note D. |
-23-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE O SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
All of the Companys senior, convertible senior and senior subordinated notes are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of the Companys direct and
indirect subsidiaries (collectively, Guarantor Subsidiaries), other than financial services
subsidiaries and certain insignificant subsidiaries (collectively, Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries).
Each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries is wholly-owned. In lieu of providing separate financial
statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, consolidated condensed financial statements are
presented below. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Guarantor
Subsidiaries are not presented because management has determined that they are not material to
investors.
Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,886.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,936.2 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,215.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,215.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,093.4 |
|
|
|
2,465.6 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,584.8 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
381.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381.7 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
114.6 |
|
|
|
292.2 |
|
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
1,073.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,073.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,832.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,809.4 |
|
|
$ |
338.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2,288.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,692.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
342.9 |
|
|
$ |
713.1 |
|
|
$ |
130.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,186.7 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031.3 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
(1,073.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,908.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,916.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,251.7 |
|
|
|
1,745.6 |
|
|
|
178.9 |
|
|
|
(1,073.3 |
) |
|
|
4,102.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,580.8 |
|
|
|
1,063.8 |
|
|
|
151.6 |
|
|
|
(1,215.4 |
) |
|
|
2,580.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,580.8 |
|
|
|
1,063.8 |
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
(1,215.4 |
) |
|
|
2,589.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Equity |
|
$ |
5,832.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,809.4 |
|
|
$ |
338.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2,288.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,692.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-24-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE O SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION (Continued)
Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,871.2 |
|
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,957.3 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,033.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,118.2 |
|
|
|
2,521.7 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,666.7 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
293.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.1 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
275.3 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490.0 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
1,280.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,280.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,785.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,881.6 |
|
|
$ |
403.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2,313.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
318.1 |
|
|
$ |
747.1 |
|
|
$ |
145.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,210.9 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,243.9 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(1,280.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,075.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,393.6 |
|
|
|
1,992.1 |
|
|
|
250.5 |
|
|
|
(1,280.0 |
) |
|
|
4,356.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
|
|
889.5 |
|
|
|
144.2 |
|
|
|
(1,033.7 |
) |
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,391.8 |
|
|
|
889.5 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
(1,033.7 |
) |
|
|
2,400.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Equity |
|
$ |
5,785.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,881.6 |
|
|
$ |
403.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2,313.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-25-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE O SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
271.6 |
|
|
$ |
835.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,108.9 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
700.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
135.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188.3 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense |
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
Equity in (income) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(66.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
(Gain) on early retirement of debt |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(66.3 |
) |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(66.3 |
) |
|
|
42.8 |
|
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(149.2 |
) |
|
|
(112.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
115.4 |
|
|
|
(149.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
174.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
(181.7 |
) |
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-26-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE O SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
180.3 |
|
|
$ |
714.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
900.3 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
185.2 |
|
|
|
626.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.0 |
|
Equity in (income) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
(Gain) on early retirement of debt |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(58.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-27-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE O SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(15.8 |
) |
|
$ |
181.3 |
|
|
$ |
54.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
220.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in notes payable |
|
|
(171.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(233.7 |
) |
Net change in intercompany receivables/payables |
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
(213.5 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock associated with certain employee benefit plans |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
(213.5 |
) |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,871.2 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,957.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,886.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,936.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28-
D.R. HORTON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009
NOTE O SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION (Continued)
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horton, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
588.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.9 |
|
|
$ |
154.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
817.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in notes payable |
|
|
(129.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277.5 |
) |
Net change in intercompany receivables/payables |
|
|
157.2 |
|
|
|
(149.1 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock associated with certain employee benefit plans |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
(149.1 |
) |
|
|
(155.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(289.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
602.5 |
|
|
|
(75.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
525.8 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,261.5 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,864.0 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,913.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-29-
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included
in this quarterly report and with our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis constitutes
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ
materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those described in the
Forward-Looking Statements section following this discussion.
BUSINESS
We are one of the largest homebuilding companies in the United States, constructing and
selling single-family housing through our operating divisions in 26 states and 73 markets as of
December 31, 2009, primarily under the name of D.R. Horton, Americas Builder. Our homebuilding
operations primarily include the construction and sale of single-family homes with sales prices
generally ranging from $90,000 to $700,000, with an average closing price of $200,400 during the
three months ended December 31, 2009. Approximately 83% and 81% of home sales revenues were
generated from the sale of single-family detached homes in the three months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The remainder of home sales revenues were generated from the sale of
attached homes, such as town homes, duplexes, triplexes and condominiums (including some mid-rise
buildings), which share common walls and roofs.
Through our financial services operations, we provide mortgage financing and title agency
services to homebuyers in many of our homebuilding markets. DHI Mortgage, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, provides mortgage financing services principally to the purchasers of homes we build.
We generally do not retain or service the mortgages we originate but, rather, seek to sell the
mortgages and related servicing rights to third-party purchasers. DHI Mortgage originates loans in
accordance with purchaser guidelines and historically has sold substantially all of its mortgage
production within 30 days of origination. Our subsidiary title companies serve as title insurance
agents by providing title insurance policies, examination and closing services, primarily to the
purchasers of our homes.
-30-
We conduct our homebuilding operations in all of the geographic regions, states and
markets listed below, and we conduct our mortgage and title operations in many of these markets.
Our homebuilding operating divisions are aggregated into six reporting segments, which are
comprised of the markets below. Our financial statements contain additional information regarding
segment performance.
|
|
|
State |
|
Reporting Region/Market |
|
|
|
|
|
East Region |
Delaware
|
|
Central Delaware |
|
|
Delaware Shore |
Georgia
|
|
Savannah |
Maryland
|
|
Baltimore |
|
|
Suburban Washington, D.C. |
New Jersey
|
|
North New Jersey |
|
|
South New Jersey |
North Carolina
|
|
Brunswick County |
|
|
Charlotte |
|
|
Greensboro/Winston-Salem |
|
|
Raleigh/Durham |
Pennsylvania
|
|
Lancaster |
|
|
Philadelphia |
South Carolina
|
|
Charleston |
|
|
Columbia |
|
|
Hilton Head |
|
|
Myrtle Beach |
Virginia
|
|
Northern Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest Region |
Colorado
|
|
Colorado Springs |
|
|
Denver |
|
|
Fort Collins |
Illinois
|
|
Chicago |
Minnesota
|
|
Minneapolis/St. Paul |
Wisconsin
|
|
Kenosha |
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region |
Alabama
|
|
Birmingham |
|
|
Mobile |
Florida
|
|
Daytona Beach |
|
|
Fort Myers/Naples |
|
|
Jacksonville |
|
|
Melbourne |
|
|
Miami/West Palm Beach |
|
|
Orlando |
|
|
Pensacola |
|
|
Sarasota County |
|
|
Tampa |
Georgia
|
|
Atlanta |
|
|
Macon |
|
|
|
State |
|
Reporting Region/Market |
|
|
|
|
|
South Central Region |
Louisiana
|
|
Baton Rouge |
|
|
Lafayette |
Oklahoma
|
|
Oklahoma City |
Texas
|
|
Austin |
|
|
Dallas |
|
|
Fort Worth |
|
|
Houston |
|
|
Killeen/Temple/Waco |
|
|
Laredo |
|
|
Rio Grande Valley |
|
|
San Antonio |
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest Region |
Arizona
|
|
Phoenix |
|
|
Tucson |
New Mexico
|
|
Albuquerque |
|
|
Las Cruces |
|
|
|
|
|
West Region |
California
|
|
Bay Area |
|
|
Central Valley |
|
|
Imperial Valley |
|
|
Los Angeles County |
|
|
Riverside County |
|
|
Sacramento |
|
|
San Bernardino County |
|
|
San Diego County |
|
|
Ventura County |
Hawaii
|
|
Hawaii |
|
|
Maui |
|
|
Oahu |
Idaho
|
|
Boise |
Nevada
|
|
Las Vegas |
|
|
Reno |
Oregon
|
|
Albany |
|
|
Central Oregon |
|
|
Portland |
Utah
|
|
Salt Lake City |
Washington
|
|
Seattle/Tacoma |
|
|
Vancouver |
-31-
OVERVIEW
During the slowdown in the homebuilding industry that began in 2006, the factors hurting
demand for new homes have been pervasive across the United States. These factors have been
persistent and include high inventory levels of available homes, elevated sales order cancellation
rates, low sales absorption rates and overall weak consumer confidence. The effects of these
factors have been magnified by reduced availability of credit in the mortgage markets, severe
shortages of liquidity in the financial markets and high levels of home foreclosures. High levels
of foreclosures not only contribute to additional inventory available for sale, but also reduce
appraisal valuations for new homes, potentially resulting in lower sales prices. The overall
economy remains weak, with a high level of unemployment, substantially reduced consumer spending
and low levels of consumer confidence. The turmoil in the housing market has resulted in
substantial price reductions in our homes during the course of the slowdown.
Although we expect generally challenging conditions will persist for some time, recently there
has been an indication of some stabilization of housing market conditions. The factors supporting
the improved conditions include increased levels of affordability, recent declines in the number of
new homes available for sale, and the federal governments monetary and fiscal policies and
programs including the homebuyer federal tax credit and the Federal Reserve Systems (Feds)
continuation of open market purchases of mortgage-backed securities which has supported the low
mortgage interest rate environment. These stabilizing housing market conditions benefited our
strategy of starting construction on more unsold homes to continue our focus of providing
affordable housing to the first-time and move-up homebuyer through existing and new communities.
These factors and actions led to an improvement in our results over the prior year.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, our net sales orders were 45% higher than a
year ago. This represents the second consecutive quarter in which our net sales orders have
improved from the comparable prior year quarter. Also, the average value of our net sales orders
for the most recent quarter of $210,600 represented an increase of 3% from both the prior year and
immediately preceding quarter. Pre-tax income for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was
$42.8 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $61.3 million in the comparable period of the prior
year. Our results for the remainder of the fiscal year will be dependent on the levels of sales we
achieve in the upcoming spring and summer selling season and the level of gross profit on those
home sales. Our sales and gross profit could be severely impacted by prolonged weakness in the
economy and continued high levels of unemployment as well as by the scheduled expiration of the
homebuyer federal tax credit in June 2010, and the announced end of the Feds open market purchases
of mortgage-backed securities in March 2010.
We continue to remain cautious regarding our outlook for the homebuilding industry. Although
the improvements in our operating performance and recent signs of stabilization of certain market
conditions have been encouraging, the timing of a sustainable recovery remains unclear. Due to the
uncertainty surrounding market conditions, we have continued to evaluate our homebuilding and
financial services assets for recoverability. Our significant assets, excluding cash, and those
whose recoverability are most impacted by market conditions include inventory, earnest money
deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to land and lot option contracts, tax assets, both on
amounts reflected as deferred and as a receivable, and owned mortgage loans. These assets
collectively comprised 90% of our total non-cash assets at December 31, 2009. Our evaluations
reflected our expectation of continued challenges in the homebuilding industry, while also
considering the improvements we achieved in our operating results during the three months ended
December 31, 2009. Based on our evaluations, during the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
recorded inventory impairment charges of $1.7 million and recorded additional reserves for losses
of $2.8 million associated with mortgage loans held in portfolio and the limited recourse
provisions on previously sold mortgage loans and $0.9 million related to mortgage reinsurance
activities. The declines in inventory impairment charges and write-offs of earnest money deposits
and pre-acquisition costs reflect the improvement in gross profit from home sales experienced
during the three months ended December 31, 2009. We will evaluate whether further impairment
charges, valuation adjustments or write-offs are necessary on these assets in the coming quarters.
Additional discussion of these evaluations and charges is presented below.
-32-
STRATEGY
We believe the long-term fundamentals which support housing demand, namely population growth
and household formation, remain positive. In the near term, however, it is not possible to predict
if current homebuilding industry conditions will continue to stabilize or if they will deteriorate
from these levels. During the downturn we have increased our cash balances by generating
substantial cash flow from operations, primarily through reductions in inventory and mortgage loans
held for sale along with tax refunds, and by accessing the capital markets. While we will continue
to conservatively manage our business, our increased liquidity provides us with flexibility in
determining the appropriate operating strategy for each of our communities and markets to strike
the best balance between cash flow generation and potential profit. With this flexibility, we are
committed to continuing the following initiatives related to our operating strategy in the current
homebuilding business environment:
|
|
|
Maintaining a strong cash balance and overall liquidity position. |
|
|
|
|
Managing the sales prices and level of sales incentives on our homes as necessary to
optimize the balance of sales volumes, returns and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
Entering into new finished lot option contracts to purchase finished lots in an
attempt to increase sales volumes and profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Renegotiating existing finished lot option contracts to reduce our lot costs and
better match the scheduled purchases with new home demand in the community. |
|
|
|
|
Limiting our land development spending or suspending development in communities that
require substantial investments of time or capital resources. |
|
|
|
|
Managing our inventory of homes under construction by starting construction on
unsold homes to take advantage of market opportunities, while monitoring the aging of
unsold homes and aggressively marketing our unsold, completed homes in inventory. |
|
|
|
|
Decreasing our cost of goods purchased from both vendors and subcontractors. |
|
|
|
|
Modifying our product offerings to provide more affordable homes. |
|
|
|
|
Controlling our SG&A infrastructure to match production levels. |
These initiatives allowed us to generate significant cash flows from operations during the
downturn and achieve improved operating results during the three months ended December 31, 2009.
Although we cannot provide any assurances that these initiatives will be successful in the future,
we expect that our operating strategy will allow us to continue to maintain a strong balance sheet
and liquidity position in fiscal 2010.
-33-
KEY RESULTS
Key financial results as of and for the three months ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
the same period of 2008, were as follows:
Homebuilding Operations:
|
|
|
Homebuilding revenues increased 23% to $1.1 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Homes closed increased 36% to 5,529 homes and the average selling price of those
homes decreased 8% to $200,400. |
|
|
|
|
Net sales orders increased 45% to 4,037 homes. |
|
|
|
|
Sales order backlog decreased 1% to $884.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
Home sales gross margins increased 160 basis points to 17.1%. |
|
|
|
|
Inventory impairments and land option cost write-offs were $1.2 million, compared to
$56.2 million. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding SG&A expenses increased 1% to $128.4 million, but decreased as a
percentage of homebuilding revenues by 250 basis points to 11.6%. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding pre-tax income was $36.1 million, compared to a pre-tax loss of $58.4
million. |
|
|
|
|
Homes in inventory increased by 800 to 11,500. |
|
|
|
|
Owned lots declined by 9,000 to 88,000. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding debt decreased by $495 million to $2.9 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Net homebuilding debt to total capital decreased 730 basis points to 28.0%, and
gross homebuilding debt to total capital decreased 200 basis points to 52.9%. |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding cash was $1.90 billion, compared to $1.88 billion at December 31, 2008. |
Financial Services Operations:
|
|
|
Total financial services revenues, net of recourse and reinsurance expenses,
increased 32% to $23.3 million. |
|
|
|
|
Financial services pre-tax income was $6.7 million, compared to a pre-tax loss of
$2.9 million. |
|
|
|
|
Financial services debt decreased by $49.7 million to $6.2 million. |
Consolidated Results:
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share was $0.56, compared to net loss per share of $0.20. |
|
|
|
|
Net income was $192.0 million, compared to net loss of $62.6 million. |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity decreased 7% to $2.6 billion, from $2.8 billion at December 31,
2008. |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations was $220.0 million, compared to $817.0 million. |
-34-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS HOMEBUILDING
The following tables and related discussion set forth key operating and financial data for our
homebuilding operations by reporting segment as of and for the three months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales Orders (1) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
Net Homes Sold |
|
|
Value (In millions) |
|
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
East |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
97.2 |
|
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
$ |
244,800 |
|
|
$ |
222,500 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Midwest |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
279,600 |
|
|
|
271,500 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Southeast |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
188,500 |
|
|
|
176,200 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
South Central |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
255.6 |
|
|
|
173.2 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
173,600 |
|
|
|
175,700 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Southwest |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
176,200 |
|
|
|
167,900 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
West |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
202.4 |
|
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
293,800 |
|
|
|
300,500 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
$ |
850.1 |
|
|
$ |
567.5 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
$ |
210,600 |
|
|
$ |
204,400 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Order Cancellations |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
Cancelled Sales Orders |
|
|
Value (In millions) |
|
|
Cancellation Rate (2) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
East |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Midwest |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
Southeast |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
South Central |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Southwest |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
West |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
$ |
268.7 |
|
|
$ |
364.3 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net sales orders represent the number and dollar value of new sales contracts
executed with customers (gross sales orders), net of cancelled sales orders. |
|
(2) |
|
Cancellation rate represents the number of cancelled sales orders divided by
gross sales orders. |
Net Sales Orders
The value of net sales orders increased 50%, to $850.1 million (4,037 homes) for the three
months ended December 31, 2009, from $567.5 million (2,777 homes) for the same period of 2008. The
number of net sales orders increased 45% for the three-month period ended December 31, 2009
compared to the same period of 2008. These results reflect significant improvement over the prior
year, and suggest the severe declines in our net sales orders experienced in recent years may be
moderating. These results were impacted by increased levels of affordability, recent declines in
the number of new homes available for sale, and the federal governments monetary and fiscal
policies and programs including the homebuyer federal tax credit and the Feds continuation of open
market purchases of mortgage-backed securities The largest percentage increase in net sales orders
occurred in our East and West regions resulting from new communities in the Carolinas and lower
cancellation rates in our West region markets. The South Central regions net sales order
comparison benefitted from both new communities and lower cancellation rates in all of its markets.
Our sales volumes for the remainder of fiscal 2010 will depend on the strength of the overall
economy, the impact of changes in federal government programs and policies on the homebuilding
industry and our ability to successfully implement our operating strategies in each of our markets.
In comparing the three-month period ended December 31, 2009 to the same period of 2008, the
value of net sales orders increased significantly in all of our market regions. These increases
were due to a significant increase in the number of homes sold in all regions, and to a lesser
extent, small increases in the average selling price of those homes in most regions.
-35-
The average price of our net sales orders in the three months ended December 31, 2009 was
$210,600, an increase of 3% from the $204,400 average in the comparable period of 2008, with modest
fluctuations across most regions with the largest increase in the East region resulting from higher
sales prices in our Maryland, Virginia and New Jersey markets. As compared to the prior year quarter, the relatively consistent average prices of our net sales orders in the other regions reflect some recent
stabilization in market conditions. However, given the uncertainty of future conditions in the
homebuilding industry, we expect continued volatility in prices of our net sales orders for the
remainder of fiscal 2010. We will continue our efforts to offer affordable product offerings to our
target customer base and will adjust our product mix, geographic mix and pricing within our
homebuilding markets to meet market conditions.
Our sales order cancellation rate (cancelled sales orders divided by gross sales orders for
the period) during the three months ended December 31, 2009 was 26%, compared to 38% during the
same period of 2008. While this represents a substantial improvement from the prior year and is
consistent with the 27% rate experienced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the cancellation
rate is higher than historical levels and reflects the ongoing challenges in most of our
homebuilding markets, including the inability of many prospective homebuyers to sell their existing
homes, the low levels of buyer confidence and the tight credit conditions in the mortgage markets.
We anticipate that cancellation rates will remain elevated and may continue to fluctuate
significantly until market conditions improve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Order Backlog |
|
|
As
of December 31, |
|
|
Homes
in Backlog |
|
Value (In millions) |
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
East |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
96.6 |
|
|
$ |
98.7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
$ |
241,500 |
|
|
$ |
234,400 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Midwest |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
290,100 |
|
|
|
276,500 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Southeast |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
150.8 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
197,400 |
|
|
|
202,900 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
South Central |
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
295.5 |
|
|
|
278.8 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
175,200 |
|
|
|
178,600 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Southwest |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
|
181,300 |
|
|
|
199,800 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
West |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
187.4 |
|
|
|
220.3 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
308,700 |
|
|
|
330,800 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,136 |
|
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
884.0 |
|
|
$ |
889.1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
$ |
213,700 |
|
|
$ |
221,900 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Order Backlog
Sales order backlog represents homes under contract but not yet closed at the
end of the period. Many of the contracts in our sales order backlog are subject
to contingencies, including mortgage loan approval and buyers selling their existing
homes, which can result in cancellations. A portion of the contracts in backlog will
not result in closings due to cancellations, which during the current housing downturn
have been substantial. At December 31, 2009, the value of our backlog of sales orders
was $884.0 million (4,136 homes), a decrease of 1% from $889.1 million (4,006 homes) at
December 31, 2008. The average sales price of homes in backlog was $213,700 at December 31,
2009, down 4% from the $221,900 average at December 31, 2008. The year-over-year increase
in home sales activity in the first quarter contributed to increases in the value of our
sales order backlog in three of our six market regions. However, the value of our backlog
decreased significantly in our Southwest region, particularly in our Phoenix market, and
in our West region, particularly in our Northern California market.
-36-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes Closed and Home Sales Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
Homes Closed |
|
Value (In millions) |
|
Average Selling Price |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
East |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
$ |
127.2 |
|
|
$ |
75.8 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
$ |
228,800 |
|
|
$ |
237,600 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Midwest |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
259,800 |
|
|
|
276,800 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Southeast |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
181.9 |
|
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
178,300 |
|
|
|
190,600 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
South Central |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
357.7 |
|
|
|
253.7 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
169,300 |
|
|
|
178,200 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Southwest |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
95.3 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
(30 |
)% |
|
|
170,200 |
|
|
|
195,800 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
West |
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
|
212.6 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
274,200 |
|
|
|
323,100 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
$ |
1,108.2 |
|
|
$ |
885.8 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
200,400 |
|
|
$ |
217,700 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Sales Revenue
Revenues from home sales increased 25%, to $1,108.2 million (5,529 homes closed) for the three
months ended December 31, 2009, from $885.8 million (4,068 homes closed) for the comparable period
of 2008. The average selling price of homes closed during the three months ended December 31, 2009
was $200,400, down 8% from the $217,700 average for the same period of 2008. During the three
months ended December 31, 2009, home sales revenues increased significantly in five of our six
market regions, resulting from a 36% increase in the number of homes closed.
The number of homes closed in the three months ended December 31, 2009 increased 36% due to
significant increases in five of our six market regions. The increase in home closings reflects the
impact of the originally scheduled expiration date of the first-time homebuyers federal tax credit
on November 30, 2009 which helped to stimulate demand for home closings in this quarter. Unlike the
other regions, the Southwest region had a decline in homes closed due to continued weak demand in
the Phoenix market along with prior year efforts in that market to reduce completed homes
inventory. As conditions change in the housing markets in which we operate, our ongoing level of
net sales orders will determine the number of home closings and amount of revenue we will generate.
Homebuilding Operating Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages of Related Revenues |
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Gross profit Home sales |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
Gross profit Land/lot sales |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Effect of inventory impairments and land option cost
write-offs on total homebuilding gross profit |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
Gross profit Total homebuilding |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
(Gain) on early retirement of debt |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Other (income) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
(6.5 |
)% |
-37-
Home
Sales Gross Profit
Gross profit from home sales increased by 38%, to $189.4 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, from $137.1 million for the comparable period of 2008. As a percentage of home
sales revenues, gross profit from home sales increased 160 basis points, to 17.1%. Approximately
130 basis points of the increase in the home sales gross profit percentage was a result of the
average cost of our homes declining by more than our average selling prices, caused largely by the
effects of prior inventory impairments on homes closed during the current quarter. In addition, the
increase in home sales gross profit is partially due to our recent ability to construct and close
houses on recently acquired finished lots in new communities. These recently acquired finished lots
were contracted for during fiscal 2009 and are yielding higher gross profits than our land and lots
acquired in prior years. Approximately 80 basis points of the increase was due to a decrease in the
amortization of capitalized interest and property taxes as a percentage of homes sales revenues
resulting from reductions in our interest and property taxes incurred and capitalized over the past
year and more closings occurring on acquired finished lots, rather than internally developed lots.
These increases were partially offset by a decrease of 50 basis points due to the change in
estimated costs of warranty and construction defect claims as a percentage of home sales revenue.
Future changes in gross profit percentages are substantially dependent on our future need for
the use of sales incentives and price adjustments to generate an adequate volume of home closings
and cannot be predicted in the current housing market.
Land Sales Revenue and Gross Profit
Land sales revenues decreased 95% to $0.7 million for the three months ended December 31,
2009, from $14.5 million in the comparable period of 2008. Of the $14.5 million of land sales
revenues during the three months ended December 31, 2008, $10.2 million related to land sale
transactions in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for which recognition of the revenue had been
deferred due to the terms of the sale. The gross profit percentage from land sales decreased to
14.3% for the three months ended December 31, 2009, from 19.3% in the comparable period of the
prior year. The fluctuations in revenues and gross profit percentages from land sales are a
function of how we manage our inventory levels in various markets. We generally purchase land and
lots with the intent to build and sell homes on them; however, we occasionally purchase land that
includes commercially zoned parcels which we typically sell to commercial developers, and we also
sell residential lots or land parcels to manage our land and lot supply. Land and lot sales occur
at unpredictable intervals and varying degrees of profitability. Therefore, the revenues and gross
profit from land sales can fluctuate significantly from period to period. As of December 31, 2009,
we had $14.5 million of land held for sale which we expect to sell in the next twelve months.
-38-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Cost Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
East |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
South Central |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
West |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
55.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Values of Potentially Impaired and Impaired Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory with |
|
|
Analysis of Communities with Impairment Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Indicators |
|
|
Recorded at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Values in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
68.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Midwest |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
83.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
West |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
$ |
484.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Values of Potentially Impaired and Impaired Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory with |
|
|
Analysis of Communities with Impairment Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Indicators |
|
|
Recorded at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Communities (1) |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Values in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
157.8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
85.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
143.0 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
South Central |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
West |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
354.3 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
176.8 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
$ |
963.1 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
421.3 |
|
|
$ |
246.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A community may consist of land held for development, residential land and lots developed and
under development, and construction in progress and finished homes. A particular community
often includes inventory in more than one category. Further, a community may contain multiple
parcels with varying product types (e.g. entry level and move-up single family detached, as
well as attached product types). Some communities have no homes under construction, finished
homes, nor current home sales efforts or activity. |
-39-
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Cost Write-offs
At December 31, 2009, the assumptions utilized in our quarterly impairment evaluation
reflected the stabilizing conditions experienced in many of our markets as indicated by the
improvements in our operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2009, as well as our
expectation of continued challenging conditions in the homebuilding industry and in our markets.
Our gross profit from home sales during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 improved by 460 basis
points and 400 basis points compared to the fourth quarter and full year of fiscal 2009,
respectively. Additionally, during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our net sales orders increased
45% from a year ago. These improvements in performance directly impacted the level of our
impairment charges during the three months ended December 31, 2009. As we move into the spring and
summer selling season of fiscal 2010 and analyze the strength of the economy, the homebuilding
industry and our operating performance, the level of impairments in future quarters may increase.
Our impairment evaluation indicated communities with a combined carrying value of $484.0
million as of December 31, 2009, had indicators of potential impairment and these communities were
evaluated for impairment. The analysis of the large majority of these communities assumed that
sales prices in future periods will be equal to or lower than current sales order prices in each
community, or in comparable communities, in order to generate an acceptable absorption rate. For a
minority of communities that we do not intend to develop or operate in current market conditions,
slight increases over current sales prices were assumed. While it is difficult to determine a
timeframe for a given community in the current market conditions, we estimated the remaining lives
of these communities to range from six months to in excess of ten years. In performing this
analysis, we utilized a range of discount rates for communities of 14% to 20%, which is consistent
with the rates used in fiscal 2009. Through this evaluation process, we determined that communities
with a carrying value of $5.3 million as of December 31, 2009, were impaired. As a result, during
the three months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $1.7 million to reduce
the carrying value of the impaired communities to their estimated fair value, as compared to $55.1
million in the same period of the prior year. In the three months ended December 31, 2009,
approximately 63% of the impairment charges were recorded to residential land and lots and land
held for development, and approximately 37% of the charges were recorded to construction in
progress and finished homes inventory, compared to 62% and 38%, respectively, in the same period of
2008.
Of the remaining $478.7 million carrying value of communities with impairment indicators which
were determined not to be impaired at December 31, 2009, the largest concentrations were in
California (21%), Texas (14%), Hawaii (12%) and Illinois (11%). It is possible that our estimate of
undiscounted cash flows from these communities may change and could result in a future need to
record impairment charges to adjust the carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair
value. There are several factors which could lead to changes in the estimates of undiscounted
future cash flows for a given community. The most significant of these include pricing and
incentive levels actually realized by the community, the rate at which the homes are sold and the
costs incurred to construct the homes. The pricing and incentive levels are often inter-related
with sales pace within a community such that a price reduction can be expected to increase the
sales pace. Further, both of these factors are heavily influenced by the competitive pressures
facing a given community from both new homes and existing homes which may result from foreclosures.
If conditions in the broader economy, homebuilding industry or specific markets in which we operate
worsen, which could be triggered by withdrawal of government support, and as we re-evaluate
specific community pricing and incentives, construction and development plans, and our overall land
sale strategies, we may be required to evaluate additional communities or re-evaluate previously
impaired communities for potential impairment. These evaluations may result in additional
impairment charges.
During the three-month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recovered $0.5 million and
wrote off $1.1 million, respectively, of earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition costs related
to land option contracts which are not expected to be acquired. At December 31, 2009, outstanding
earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition costs associated with our portfolio of land and lot
option purchase contracts totaled $9.3 million and $6.9 million, respectively.
The inventory impairment charges and write-offs of earnest money deposits and pre-acquisition
costs reduced total homebuilding gross profit as a percentage of homebuilding revenues by
approximately 10 basis points in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to 620 basis
points in the same period of 2008.
-40-
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expense
SG&A expense from homebuilding activities increased by 1% to $128.4 million in the three
months ended December 31, 2009, from $127.0 million in the comparable period of 2008. However, as a
percentage of homebuilding revenues, SG&A expense decreased 250 basis points to 11.6% in the
three-month period ended December 31, 2009, from 14.1% in the comparable period of 2008. The
largest component of our homebuilding SG&A expense is employee compensation and related costs,
which represented 56% and 58% of SG&A costs in the three-month periods ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. These costs decreased by 1%, to $72.4 million in the three months ended
December 31, 2009, from $73.5 million in the comparable period of 2008. Our homebuilding operations
employed approximately 2,400 and 2,600 employees at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Our homebuilding SG&A expense as a percentage of revenues can vary significantly between
quarters, depending largely on the fluctuations in quarterly revenue levels. We continue to adjust
our SG&A infrastructure to support our expected closings volume; however, we cannot make assurances
that our actions will permit us to maintain or improve upon the current SG&A expense as a
percentage of revenues. It has become more difficult to reduce SG&A expense as the size of our
operations has decreased. If revenues decrease and we are unable to sufficiently adjust our SG&A,
future SG&A expense as a percentage of revenues will increase.
Interest Incurred
We capitalize homebuilding interest costs to inventory during active development and
construction. Due to the decrease in the size of our operations, our inventory under active
development and construction has been lower than our debt level; therefore, a portion of our
interest incurred must be expensed. We expensed $26.9 million of interest incurred during the
three-month period ended December 31, 2009, compared to $25.6 million in the same period of 2008.
Interest amortized to cost of sales, excluding interest written off with inventory impairment
charges, was 3.5% of total home and land/lot cost of sales in the three months ended December 31,
2009, compared to 4.1% in the same period of 2008. Interest incurred is related to the average
level of our homebuilding debt outstanding during the period. Comparing the three months ended
December 31, 2009 with the same period of 2008, interest incurred related to homebuilding debt
decreased 12% to $49.9 million, due to a 12% decrease in our average homebuilding debt.
Gain on Early Retirement of Debt
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we repurchased a total of $173.2 million
principal amount of various issues of our senior notes prior to their maturity. These notes were
repurchased primarily through unsolicited transactions for an aggregate purchase price of $171.0
million, plus accrued interest. We recognized a net gain of $1.6 million related to these
repurchases, which represents the difference between the principal amount of the notes and the
aggregate purchase price, less any unamortized discounts and fees.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, through unsolicited transactions, we
repurchased a total of $136.1 million principal amount of various issues of our senior notes prior
to their maturity, for an aggregate purchase price of $129.7 million, plus accrued interest. We
recognized a net gain of $6.2 million, net of any unamortized discounts and fees, related to these
repurchases.
Other Income
Other income, net of other expenses, associated with homebuilding activities was $1.5 million
in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to $4.3 million in the comparable period of
2008. The largest component of other income in both periods was interest income.
-41-
Homebuilding Results by Reporting Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
Before |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Homebuilding |
|
|
Before |
|
|
Region |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Income Taxes (1) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Income Taxes (1) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
|
$ |
127.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
|
$ |
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
)% |
Midwest |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
)% |
Southeast |
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
147.1 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
South Central |
|
|
357.8 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
255.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Southwest |
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
137.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
West |
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
213.1 |
|
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,108.9 |
|
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
900.3 |
|
|
$ |
(58.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expenses maintained at the corporate level are allocated to each
segment based on the segments average inventory. These expenses
consist primarily of capitalized interest and property taxes, which
are amortized to cost of sales, and the expenses related to operating
our corporate office. |
East Region Homebuilding revenues increased 68% in the three months ended December 31, 2009,
from the comparable period of 2008, primarily due to a 74% increase in the number of homes closed,
with increases in all markets except for our Maryland markets. The region reported income before
income taxes of $2.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to a loss of
$10.9 million for the same period of 2008. The loss in 2008 was due in part to inventory impairment
charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $4.0 million. The regions
gross profit from home sales as a percentage of home sales revenue (home sales gross profit
percentage) increased 380 basis points in the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to the
same period of 2008. The increase was a result of the average cost of our homes declining by more
than the average selling prices due to the effects of prior inventory impairments on homes closed
during the current quarter. The reduction in the regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding
revenues contributed 690 basis points to the regions improvement in income before income taxes as
a percentage of homebuilding revenues.
Midwest Region Homebuilding revenues increased 24% in the three months ended December 31,
2009, from the comparable period of 2008, primarily due to a 32% increase in the number of homes
closed, with the largest increase in our Chicago market. The region reported a loss before income
taxes of $0.5 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to a loss of $11.6
million for the same period of 2008. The loss for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was due
in part to inventory impairment charges totaling $3.8 million. The regions home sales gross profit
percentage increased 710 basis points in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the
same period of 2008. The increase was a result of higher margins in our Chicago and Denver markets,
as well as lower warranty costs on previously closed homes in our Denver market and the effects of
prior inventory impairments on homes closed during the current quarter. The reduction in the
regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding revenues contributed 390 basis points to the regions
improvement in income before income taxes as a percentage of homebuilding revenues.
Southeast Region Homebuilding revenues increased 24% in the three months ended December 31,
2009, from the comparable period of 2008, primarily due to a 42% increase in the number of homes
closed, with the largest increases in our Central Florida and Atlanta markets. The region reported
income before income taxes of $1.0 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to
a loss of $5.1 million for the same period of 2008. The results were due in part to inventory
impairment charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $1.2 million and
$3.7 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The regions home
sales gross profit percentage increased 210 basis points in the three months ended December 31,
2009, compared to the same period of 2008. The increase was a result of higher margins on homes
closed in the majority of our markets, led by the South Florida and Mobile markets. The reduction
in the regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding revenues contributed 70 basis points to the
regions improvement in income before income taxes as a percentage of homebuilding revenues.
-42-
South Central Region Homebuilding revenues increased 40% in the three months ended December
31, 2009, from the comparable period of 2008, primarily due to a 48% increase in the number of
homes closed, with the largest increases in our Austin and Dallas markets. The region reported
income before income taxes of $25.4 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared
to $11.8 million for the same period of 2008. The improvement was due in large part to the increase
in revenue, combined with the regions home sales gross profit percentage increasing 170 basis
points in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period of 2008 due to
higher margins on homes closed in the majority of our markets, led by the Dallas and Houston
markets. The reduction in the regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding revenues contributed 90
basis points to the regions improvement in income before income taxes as a percentage of
homebuilding revenues. Additionally, a decrease in inventory impairment charges and earnest money
and pre-acquisition cost write-offs, which were $0.2 million in the three months ended December 31,
2009 compared to $1.7 million in the same period of 2008, contributed to the regions increase in
income before income taxes.
Southwest Region Homebuilding revenues decreased 31% in the three months ended December 31,
2009, from the comparable period of 2008, due to a 19% decrease in the number of homes closed and a
13% decrease in the average selling price of those homes. The decrease in revenues and homes closed
was due to continuing weakness in the Phoenix market. The region reported income before income
taxes of $4.7 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to income before income
taxes of $3.0 million for the same period of 2008. The income for both periods was reduced by
inventory impairment charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $0.3
million and $2.0 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
regions home sales gross profit percentage increased 190 basis points in the three months ended
December 31, 2009, compared to the same period of 2008. The increase was a result of the average
cost of our homes declining by more than the average selling prices, in part due to the effects of
prior inventory impairments on homes closed during the current quarter.
West Region Homebuilding revenues increased 21% in the three months ended December 31, 2009,
from the comparable period of 2008, due to a 43% increase in the number of homes closed which was
partially offset by a 15% decrease in the average selling price of those homes. The largest
increases in homes closed occurred in our Southern California markets. The region reported income
before income taxes of $3.4 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to a loss
of $45.6 million for the same period of 2008. The loss in 2008 was due in large part to inventory
impairment charges and earnest money and pre-acquisition cost write-offs totaling $41.0 million.
The reduction in the regions SG&A as a percentage of homebuilding revenues contributed 530 basis
points to the regions improvement in income before income taxes as a percentage of homebuilding
revenues. Offsetting these improvements, the regions home sales gross profit percentage decreased
150 basis points in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period of 2008
due to reductions in the estimated costs to complete certain development projects, the effects of
which were magnified by lower homebuilding revenues during the three months ended December 31,
2008.
-43-
LAND AND LOT POSITION AND HOMES IN INVENTORY
The following is a summary of our land and lot position and homes in inventory at December 31,
2009 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Lot |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Lot |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option and |
|
|
Land/Lots |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option and |
|
|
Land/Lots |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
|
Land/Lots |
|
|
Similar |
|
|
Owned and |
|
|
in |
|
|
Land/Lots |
|
|
Similar |
|
|
Owned and |
|
|
in |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Contracts (1) |
|
|
Controlled |
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Contracts (1) |
|
|
Controlled |
|
|
Inventory |
|
East |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
27,500 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
South Central |
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
31,500 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
West |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
89,500 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
109,000 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79% |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82% |
|
|
|
18% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes approximately 7,000 lots at December 31, 2009 and September
30, 2009, representing lots controlled under lot option contracts for
which we do not expect to exercise our option to purchase the land or
lots, and have reserved the deposits related to these contracts but
the underlying contract has not yet been terminated. |
At December 31, 2009, we owned or controlled approximately 112,000 lots, compared to
approximately 109,000 lots at September 30, 2009. Of the 112,000 total lots, we controlled
approximately 24,000 lots (21%), with a total remaining purchase price of approximately $757.6
million, through land and lot option purchase contracts with a total of $9.3 million in earnest
money deposits. At December 31, 2009, approximately 22,000 of our owned lots were finished.
We had a total of approximately 11,500 homes in inventory, including approximately 1,100 model
homes at December 31, 2009, compared to approximately 11,600 homes in inventory, including
approximately 1,100 model homes at September 30, 2009. Of our total homes in inventory,
approximately 7,300 and 5,800 were unsold at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009,
respectively. At December 31, 2009, approximately 2,900 of our unsold homes were completed, of
which approximately 600 homes had been completed for more than six months. At September 30, 2009,
approximately 2,200 of our unsold homes were completed, of which approximately 800 homes had been
completed for more than six months.
Our current strategy is to take advantage of market opportunities by entering into new
finished lot option contracts to purchase finished lots in selected communities in an attempt to
increase sales volumes and profitability. We plan to continue to manage our inventory of homes
under construction by starting construction on unsold homes in certain markets, while monitoring
the aging of unsold homes and aggressively marketing our unsold, completed homes in inventory.
-44-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL SERVICES
The following tables set forth key operating and financial data for our financial services
operations, comprising DHI Mortgage and our subsidiary title companies, for the three-month periods
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
% Change |
Number of first-lien loans originated or brokered by
DHI Mortgage for D.R. Horton homebuyers |
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Number of homes closed by D.R. Horton |
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
DHI Mortgage capture rate |
|
|
61% |
|
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of total loans originated or brokered by
DHI Mortgage for D.R. Horton homebuyers |
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Total number of loans originated or brokered by DHI Mortgage |
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Captive business percentage |
|
|
90% |
|
|
|
89% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold by DHI Mortgage to third parties |
|
|
3,983 |
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan origination fees |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Sale of servicing rights and gains from sale of mortgages |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Recourse expense |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of servicing rights and gains from sale of mortgages, net |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Reinsurance expense |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues, net |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage operations revenues |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Title policy premiums, net |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
331 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services Operating Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages of |
|
|
Financial Services Revenues (1) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Recourse and reinsurance expense |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
69.3 |
% |
|
|
97.1 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Interest and other (income) |
|
|
(9.6 |
)% |
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
(12.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the effects of recourse and reinsurance charges on financial services revenues |
-45-
Mortgage Loan Activity
In the three-month period ended December 31, 2009, total first-lien loans originated or
brokered by DHI Mortgage for our homebuyers increased by 29%, corresponding to the 36% increase in
the number of homes closed by our homebuilding operations. The percentage increase in loans
originated was lower than the percentage increase in homes closed due to a decrease in our mortgage
capture rate (the percentage of total home closings by our homebuilding operations for which DHI
Mortgage handled the homebuyers financing), to 61% in the current quarter, from 65% in the
comparable prior year quarter.
Home closings from our homebuilding operations constituted 90% of DHI Mortgage loan
originations in the three-month period ended December 31, 2009, compared to 89% in the comparable
period of 2008. These consistently high rates reflect DHI Mortgages continued focus on supporting
the captive business provided by our homebuilding operations.
The number of loans sold to third-party purchasers increased by 9% in the three months ended
December 31, 2009, from the comparable period of 2008. Loans are typically sold within 30 days of
origination. Fluctuations in the volume of loans sold for a given period may not correspond to the
change in loan origination volume because of the timing of loan sales, which for any quarter
generally represents the loans originated in the last month of the prior quarter plus the first two
months of the current quarter. In the current quarter, the lower percentage increase in loan sales
volume compared to loan origination volume reflects a lower volume of loan originations in
September 2009 as compared to September 2008. Consistent with fiscal 2008 and 2009, originations
during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 continued to predominantly be eligible for sale to Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, or GNMA (Agency-eligible). For the three-month period ended December 31, 2009,
approximately 99% of DHI Mortgage production and 97% of mortgage loans held for sale on December
31, 2009 were Agency-eligible.
Financial Services Revenues and Expenses
Loan origination fees decreased 23%, to $4.6 million in the three months December 31, 2009,
from $6.0 million in the comparable period of 2008. The decrease in loan origination fees relates
to the adoption of the FASBs authoritative guidance for fair value measurements of certain
financial instruments on October 1, 2008. The authoritative guidance required net origination costs
and fees associated with mortgage loans to be recognized at origination and no longer deferred
until the time of sale. Therefore, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, we recognized
$2.4 million of loan origination fees and $5.0 million of general and administrative (G&A) costs
related to prior period loan originations. Revenues from the sale of servicing rights and gains
from sale of mortgages increased 35%, to $14.6 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009,
from $10.8 million in the comparable period of 2008. The increase was primarily due to the increase
in the number of mortgage loans originated. Charges related to recourse obligations were $2.8
million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to $3.5 million in the same period of
2008. The calculation of our required repurchase loss reserve is based upon an analysis of
repurchase requests received, our actual repurchases and losses through the disposition of such,
discussions with our mortgage purchasers and analysis of the mortgages we originated. While we
believe that we have adequately reserved for losses on known and projected repurchase requests, if
actual repurchases or if the losses incurred resolving those repurchases exceed our expectations,
additional recourse expense may be incurred. Also, a subsidiary of ours reinsured a portion of
private mortgage insurance written on loans originated by DHI Mortgage in prior years. Charges to
increase reserves for expected losses on the reinsured loans were $0.9 million in the three months
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $2.7 million in the same period of 2008.
G&A expense associated with financial services decreased 19%, to $18.7 million in the three
months ended December 31, 2009, from $23.2 million in the comparable period of 2008. The largest
component of our financial services G&A expense is employee compensation and related costs, which
represented 77% of G&A costs in the three-month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. These
costs decreased 20%, to $14.3 million in the three months ended December 31, 2009, from $17.8
million in the comparable period of 2008. The decrease is due to the $5.0 million of compensation
expense related to prior period loan originations recognized during the three months ended December
31, 2008 as a result of the adoption of the FASBs authoritative guidance for fair value
measurements of certain financial instruments. The decrease is partially offset by an increase in
financial services employees from 550 at December 31, 2008 to 640 at December 31, 2009.
As a percentage of financial services revenues, excluding the effects of recourse and
reinsurance expense, G&A expense in the three-month period ended December 31, 2009 decreased to
69.3%, from 97.1% in the comparable
-46-
period of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the recognition of $5.0 million of G&A costs related to prior period loan originations during the three
months ended December 31, 2008 as a result of the adoption of the FASBs authoritative guidance for
fair value measurements of certain financial instruments. Fluctuations in financial services G&A
expense as a percentage of revenues can be expected to occur as some expenses are not directly
related to mortgage loan volume or to changes in the amount of revenue earned.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes
Income before income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was $42.8 million,
compared to a loss before income taxes of $61.3 million for the same period of 2008. The difference
in our operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to a year ago is
primarily due to the higher volume of homes closed which resulted in higher revenues, a higher
gross profit from home sales and lower inventory impairment charges.
Income Taxes
The benefit from income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was $149.2 million
compared to a provision for income taxes of $1.3 million in the comparable period of the prior
year. The benefit from income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2009 consists of a
benefit of $198.8 million from a change in tax law which expanded the number of years we can carry
back federal tax losses, offset by a provision for income taxes of $0.9 million for state income
taxes and an increase in our reserve for unrecognized tax benefits of $48.6 million. The change in
the our effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period
of the prior year is primarily due to the change in tax law, offset by the increase in unrecognized
tax benefits during the current year.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code. This tax law change allows a
net operating loss realized in either our fiscal 2008, 2009 or 2010 years to be carried back up to
five years (previously limited to a two-year carryback). We have elected to carry back our fiscal
2009 net operating loss. This resulted in a benefit from income taxes of $198.8 million and an
increase in income taxes receivable in our consolidated balance sheet.
We had income taxes receivable of $381.7 million and $293.1 million at December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, respectively. We received $113.0 million of the $293.1 million in the form of a
tax refund during October 2009. With respect to the income taxes receivable at December 31, 2009,
$358.2 million is due to federal tax losses generated in fiscal 2009 that we carried back against
taxable income generated in fiscal 2004 and 2005. We expect to receive this federal income tax
refund during fiscal 2010. The remaining income tax receivables relate to state operating loss
carrybacks and an amended federal return.
At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, we had net deferred income tax assets of $915.2
million and $1,073.9 million, respectively, offset by valuation allowances of $915.2 million and
$1,073.9 million, respectively. Tax benefits for state net operating loss carryforwards of $81.4
million that expire (beginning at various times depending on the tax jurisdiction) from fiscal 2013
to fiscal 2029 are included in the amounts. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes
of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws also affect actual tax results and
the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (which includes interest, penalties, and the tax
benefit relating to the deductibility of interest and state income taxes) was $72.6 million and
$24.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The increase was a
result of our election to carryback our fiscal 2009 tax losses to fiscal 2004 and 2005, thereby
fully utilizing the loss carryforwards which existed at September 30, 2009. We classify interest
and penalties on income taxes as income tax expense. It is reasonably possible that, within the
next 12 months, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease as much as $49.7 million as a
result of a ruling request filed by us with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning
capitalization of inventory costs. If the IRS rules favorably on the ruling request, our unrecognized tax benefits would be reduced,
resulting in a benefit from income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations.
-47-
We are subject to federal income tax and to income tax in multiple states. The statute of
limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal years 2004
through 2010, and we are currently being audited by various states.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
We have historically funded our homebuilding and financial services operations with cash flows
from operating activities, borrowings under our bank credit facilities and the issuance of new debt
securities. In light of the challenging homebuilding market conditions experienced over the past
few years, we have been operating with a primary focus to generate cash flows through reductions in
assets and tax refunds. The generation of cash flow has allowed us to increase our liquidity and
strengthen our balance sheet and has placed us in a position to be able to invest in market
opportunities as they arise. We do not expect to generate as much cash from asset reductions in
fiscal 2010 as we have in the past three fiscal years. Depending upon future homebuilding market
conditions and our expectations for such, we may use a portion of our cash balances to increase our
assets. We intend to maintain adequate liquidity and balance sheet strength, and we will continue
to evaluate opportunities to access the capital markets as they become available.
At December 31, 2009, our ratio of net homebuilding debt to total capital was 28.0%, a
decrease of 730 basis points from 35.3% at December 31, 2008, and 450 basis points from 32.5% at
September 30, 2009. Net homebuilding debt to total capital consists of homebuilding notes payable
net of cash divided by total capital net of cash (homebuilding notes payable net of cash plus
stockholders equity). The decrease in our ratio of net homebuilding debt to total capital at
December 31, 2009 as compared with the ratio a year earlier and at September 30, 2009 was primarily
due to our lower debt balance resulting from redemptions and repurchases of senior notes, as well
as an increase in retained earnings as compared to September 30, 2009, but partially offset by a
decrease in retained earnings as compared to a year earlier. Our ratio of net homebuilding debt to
total capital remains within our target operating range of below 45%. We believe that our strong
balance sheet and liquidity position will allow us to be flexible in reacting to changing market
conditions. However, future period-end net homebuilding debt to total capital ratios may be higher
than the 28.0% ratio achieved at December 31, 2009.
We believe that the ratio of net homebuilding debt to total capital is useful in understanding
the leverage employed in our homebuilding operations and comparing us with other homebuilders. We
exclude the debt of our financial services business because it is separately capitalized and its
obligation under its repurchase agreement is substantially collateralized and not guaranteed by our
parent company or any of our homebuilding entities. Because of its capital function, we include
homebuilding cash as a reduction of our homebuilding debt and total capital. For comparison to our
ratios of net homebuilding debt to capital above, at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and at September
30, 2009, our ratios of homebuilding debt to total capital, without netting cash balances, were
52.9%, 54.9% and 56.2%, respectively.
We believe that we will be able to fund our working capital needs for our homebuilding and
financial services operations, as well as our debt obligations, through existing cash resources and
the cash flows we currently expect to generate in the near term through the receipt of tax refunds
during fiscal 2010, our mortgage repurchase facility and, for the longer term, the issuance of new
debt or equity securities through the public capital markets as market conditions may permit.
Homebuilding Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents At December 31, 2009, we had available homebuilding cash and cash
equivalents of $1.90 billion.
Secured Letter of Credit Agreements Concurrent with the termination of our revolving credit
facility in May 2009, we entered into secured letter of credit agreements with the three banks that
had issued letters of credit under the facility. The effect of these agreements was to remove the
outstanding letters of credit from the facility, which required us to deposit cash, in an amount
approximating the balance of letters of credit outstanding, as collateral with the issuing banks.
At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the amount of cash restricted for this purpose totaled
$51.6 million and $53.3 million, respectively, and is included in homebuilding restricted cash on
our consolidated balance sheets.
-48-
Public Unsecured Debt The indentures governing our senior notes and senior subordinated
notes impose restrictions on the creation of secured debt and liens. At December 31, 2009, we were
in compliance with all of the limitations and restrictions that form a part of the public debt
obligations.
Shelf Registration Statements We have an automatically effective universal shelf
registration statement filed with the SEC in September 2009, registering debt and equity securities
which we may issue from time to time in amounts to be determined.
Financial Services Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents At December 31, 2009, the amount of financial services cash and
cash equivalents was $31.9 million.
Mortgage Repurchase Facility Our mortgage subsidiary has a mortgage repurchase facility
which matures March 4, 2010. The mortgage repurchase facility provides financing and liquidity to
DHI Mortgage by facilitating purchase transactions in which DHI Mortgage transfers eligible loans
to the counterparty against the transfer of funds by the counterparty, thereby becoming purchased
loans. DHI Mortgage then has the right and obligation to repurchase the purchased loans upon their
sale to third-party purchasers in the secondary market or within specified time frames from 45 to
120 days in accordance with the terms of the mortgage repurchase facility. The facility, which is
accounted for as a secured financing, has a capacity of $100 million, with a provision allowing an
increase in the capacity to $125 million during the last five business days of a fiscal quarter and
the first seven business days of the following fiscal quarter.
As of December 31, 2009, $158.5 million of mortgage loans held for sale were pledged under the
repurchase arrangement. These mortgage loans had a collateral value of $148.6 million. DHI Mortgage
has the option to fund a portion of its repurchase obligations in advance. As a result of advance
paydowns totaling $142.4 million, DHI Mortgage had an obligation of $6.2 million outstanding under
the mortgage repurchase facility at December 31, 2009 at a 4.5% interest rate.
The mortgage repurchase facility is not guaranteed by either D.R. Horton, Inc. or any of the
subsidiaries that guarantee our homebuilding debt. The facility contains financial covenants as to
the mortgage subsidiarys minimum required tangible net worth, its maximum allowable ratio of debt
to tangible net worth and its minimum required liquidity. These covenants are measured and reported
monthly. At December 31, 2009, our mortgage subsidiary was in compliance with all of the conditions
and covenants of the mortgage repurchase facility.
In the past, we have been able to renew or extend our mortgage credit facilities on
satisfactory terms prior to their maturities, and obtain temporary additional commitments through
amendments to the credit agreements during periods of higher than normal volumes of mortgages held
for sale. The liquidity of our financial services business depends upon its continued ability to
renew and extend the mortgage repurchase facility or to obtain other additional financing in
sufficient capacities. While we intend to renew and extend our mortgage repurchase facility prior
to its maturity, and are currently exploring alternatives to do so, a successful refinancing is not
assured.
Operating Cash Flow Activities
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by our operating activities
was $220.0 million compared to $817.0 million during the comparable period of the prior year.
During the three-month period ended December 31, 2009, a significant portion of the net cash
provided by our operating activities was due to a federal income tax refund of $113.0 million,
resulting from the carryback of our fiscal 2008 net operating loss to fiscal 2006. Also, we
generated cash flows from operations by reducing our inventories and generating a profit during the
current quarter. The net cash provided by our operating activities during the past three fiscal
years has resulted in substantial liquidity and allows the flexibility to determine the appropriate
operating strategy for each of our communities and to take advantage of opportunities in the
market. While we have substantially slowed our purchases of undeveloped land and our development
spending on land we own, we are purchasing or contracting to purchase finished lots in many markets
in an attempt to drive sales and home closings volume and return to sustainable profitability.
During this effort, we also plan to continue to manage our inventories by monitoring the aging of
unsold homes and aggressively marketing our unsold, completed homes in inventory. As we work
towards these goals, we expect to generate less cash flow from asset reductions than we have over
the past three fiscal years.
-49-
Depending upon future homebuilding market conditions and our expectations for such, we may use
a portion of our cash balances to increase our assets.
Another significant source of operating cash flows in the three months ended December 31, 2009
was the decrease in mortgage loans held for sale of $56.1 million during the period. The decrease
in mortgage loans held for sale was due to a decrease in the number of loans originated during
December 2009 compared to September 2009. The amount of cash generated or used during a certain
period will fluctuate depending on the amount of loan originations, the timing of those
originations and the changes in the level of our mortgage capture rates compared to prior periods.
Investing Cash Flow Activities
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, we used $2.5 million to invest in purchases of
property and equipment, primarily model home furniture and office equipment. These purchases are
not significant relative to our total assets or cash flows, and have declined in recent years due
to the decrease in the size of our operations. Changes in restricted cash are primarily due to
fluctuations in the balance of our outstanding letters of credit, which are cash collateralized
under the terms of our secured letter of credit agreements.
Financing Cash Flow Activities
In the last two years, the majority of our short-term financing needs have been funded with
cash generated from operations and borrowings available under our financial services credit
facility. Long-term financing needs of our homebuilding operations have been generally funded with
the issuance of new senior unsecured debt securities through the public capital markets. During the
three months ended December 31, 2009, primarily through unsolicited transactions, we repurchased a
total of $173.2 million principal amount of various issues of senior notes for an aggregate
purchase price of $171.0 million, plus accrued interest. During the three months ended December 31,
2008, we repurchased a total of $136.1 million principal amount of various issues of senior notes
for an aggregate purchase price of $129.7 million, plus accrued interest. Our homebuilding senior,
convertible senior and senior subordinated notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries other than our financial services subsidiaries and certain insignificant
subsidiaries.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly
cash dividend of $0.0375 per common share, which was paid on December 15, 2009 to stockholders of
record on December 4, 2009. In January 2010, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.0375 per common share, payable on February 25, 2010 to stockholders of record on
February 16, 2010. Quarterly cash dividends of $0.0375 per common share were declared in the
comparable quarters of fiscal 2009. The declaration of future cash dividends is at the discretion
of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, cash flows,
capital requirements, our financial condition and general business conditions.
Changes in Capital Structure
On October 1, 2009, we adopted and applied retrospectively the FASBs authoritative guidance
for accounting for debt with conversion options, which specifies that issuers of such instruments
should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the
entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods.
Early adoption of this authoritative guidance was not permitted. As a result, the prior year
consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the effects of this change
in accounting for our 2% convertible senior notes issued in May 2009. We recorded the debt
component of the convertible senior notes at its fair value on the date of issuance of the notes,
assuming no conversion features. The remaining value of the equity component of the convertible
senior notes was recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the notes and an increase in
additional paid-in capital. The reduction in the carrying value of the notes and the fees related
to the notes will be amortized as interest incurred and expensed or capitalized to inventory over
the remaining life of the notes. The additional interest expense recognized in fiscal 2009 due to
the restatement was $4.5 million, which increased our diluted net loss per share for the year ended
September 30, 2009 by $0.01.
In November 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of
our common stock and the repurchase of up to $500 million of debt securities. The authorizations
are effective from December 1, 2009 to November 30, 2010. Repurchases of senior notes in December
2009 reduced the debt repurchase authorization to $388.4 million at December 31, 2009.
-50-
In January 2010, through unsolicited transactions, we repurchased $1.0 million principal
amount of our 5.875% senior notes due 2013 and $6.5 million principal amount of our 6.5% senior
notes due 2016, which further reduced the remaining debt repurchase authorization.
On January 15, 2010, we repaid the remaining $130.9 million principal amount of our 4.875%
senior notes which were due on that date. This repayment of public unsecured debt was made from our
cash balance on hand.
On January 25, 2010, we announced that we will redeem the remaining $95.0 million principal
amount of our 5.875% senior notes due 2013 on February 24, 2010, at a redemption price of 101.958%
of the face amount of the notes, plus accrued interest.
In January 2010, our stockholders did not approve our Section 382 rights agreement; therefore,
it will expire by its terms on August 19, 2010 unless earlier terminated by our Board of Directors.
In fiscal 2009, our primary non-operating uses of our available capital were the repayment of
debt, dividend payments and the cash collateralization of our outstanding letters of credit. As was
the case in the current quarter, we expect the repayment of debt to remain a significant priority
for the use of our available cash in fiscal 2010. We continue to evaluate our alternatives for
future non-operating sources and uses of our available capital, including the amounts of debt
repayments, dividend payments and the level of our cash balances, based on market conditions and
other circumstances, and within the constraints of our balance sheet leverage targets and our
liquidity targets.
CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS, COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Our primary contractual cash obligations for our homebuilding and financial services segments
are payments under our debt agreements and lease payments under operating leases. Purchase
obligations of our homebuilding segment represent specific performance requirements under lot
option purchase agreements that may require us to purchase land contingent upon the land seller
meeting certain obligations. We expect to fund our contractual obligations in the ordinary course
of business through a combination of our existing cash resources, cash flows generated from
operations, renewed or amended mortgage repurchase facilities and, if needed or believed
advantageous, the issuance of new debt or equity securities through the public capital markets as
market conditions may permit.
At December 31, 2009, our homebuilding operations had outstanding letters of credit of $50.4
million, all of which were cash collateralized, and surety bonds of $1.0 billion, issued by third
parties, to secure performance under various contracts. We expect that our performance obligations
secured by these letters of credit and bonds will generally be completed in the ordinary course of
business and in accordance with the applicable contractual terms. When we complete our performance
obligations, the related letters of credit and bonds are generally released shortly thereafter,
leaving us with no continuing obligations. We have no material third-party guarantees.
Our mortgage subsidiary enters into various commitments related to the lending activities of
our mortgage operations. Further discussion of these commitments is provided in Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part I of this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land and lot option purchase contracts to
procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Lot option contracts enable us to control
significant lot positions with limited capital investment and substantially reduce the risks
associated with land ownership and development. Within the land and lot option purchase contracts
at December 31, 2009, there were a limited number of contracts subject to specific performance
clauses which may require us to purchase the land or lots upon the land sellers meeting their
obligations. The remaining purchase price of these specific performance contracts is not material.
Also, we consolidated certain variable interest entities for which we are deemed to be the primary
beneficiary, with assets of $6.1 million related to some of our outstanding land and lot option
purchase contracts. Creditors, if any, of these variable interest entities have no recourse against
us. Additionally, we recorded $3.4 million of land inventory not owned related to some of our
outstanding land and lot option purchase contracts that were determined to represent financing
arrangements. Further discussion of our land option contracts is provided in the Land and Lot
Position and Homes in Inventory section included herein.
-51-
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
As disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
our most critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, inventories and cost of sales,
land and lot option purchase contracts, goodwill, warranty and insurance claim costs, income taxes
and stock-based compensation. Since September 30, 2009, there have been no significant changes to
those critical accounting policies and estimates.
SEASONALITY
We have typically experienced seasonal variations in our quarterly operating results and
capital requirements. Prior to the current downturn in the homebuilding industry, we generally had
more homes under construction, closed more homes and had greater revenues and operating income in
the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year. This seasonal activity increased our working
capital requirements for our homebuilding operations during the third and fourth fiscal quarters
and increased our funding requirements for the mortgages we originated in our financial services
segment at the end of these quarters. As a result of seasonal activity, our quarterly results of
operations and our financial position at the end of a particular fiscal quarter are not necessarily
representative of the balance of our fiscal year.
In contrast to our typical seasonal results, the weakness in homebuilding market conditions
during the past three years has mitigated our historical seasonal variations. Also, in fiscal 2010
we expect the scheduled expiration of the homebuyer federal tax credit to impact our construction
activities and home sales and closing volumes and timing. Although we may experience our typical
historical seasonal pattern in the future, given the current market conditions and the impact of
changes in federal government programs and policies on the homebuilding industry, we can make no
assurances as to when or whether this pattern will recur.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained in this report, as well as in other materials we have filed
or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, statements made by us in periodic press
releases and oral statements we make to analysts, stockholders and the press in the course of
presentations about us, may be construed as forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on
managements beliefs as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to,
management. These forward-looking statements typically include the words anticipate, believe,
consider, estimate, expect, forecast, goal, intend, objective, plan, predict,
projection, seek, strategy, target or other words of similar meaning. Any or all of the
forward-looking statements included in this report and in any other of our reports or public
statements may not approximate actual experience, and the expectations derived from them may not be
realized, due to risks, uncertainties and other factors. As a result, actual results may differ
materially from the expectations or results we discuss in the forward-looking statements. These
risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the continuing downturn in the homebuilding industry, including further
deterioration in industry or broader economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the continuing constriction of the credit markets, which could limit our ability to
access capital and increase our costs of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the reduction in availability of mortgage financing, increases in mortgage interest
rates and the effects of expiring government programs, such as the homebuyer federal
tax credit and the Feds open market purchases of mortgage-backed securities, both
scheduled to end in 2010; |
|
|
|
|
the limited success of our strategies in responding to adverse conditions in the
industry; |
|
|
|
|
a return of an inflationary environment; |
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic, real estate and other business conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with our inventory ownership position in changing market
conditions; |
|
|
|
|
supply risks for land, materials and labor; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the costs of owning a home; |
-52-
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulations and environmental matters on our
homebuilding operations; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulations on our financial services operations; |
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties inherent in home warranty and construction defect claims matters; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial debt and our ability to comply with related debt covenants,
restrictions and limitations; |
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions within our industry; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to effect any future growth strategies successfully; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to realize our deferred tax asset; and |
|
|
|
|
the utilization of our tax losses could be substantially limited if we experienced
an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. |
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further
disclosures made on related subjects in subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be
consulted. Additional information about issues that could lead to material changes in performance
and risk factors that have the potential to affect us is contained in Item 1A. Risk Factors under
Part II of this report and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2009, including the section entitled Risk Factors, which is filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are subject to interest rate risk on our long-term debt. We monitor our exposure to changes
in interest rates and utilize both fixed and variable rate debt. For fixed rate debt, changes in
interest rates generally affect the value of the debt instrument, but not our earnings or cash
flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not impact the
fair value of the debt instrument, but may affect our future earnings and cash flows. We generally
do not have an obligation to prepay fixed-rate debt prior to maturity and, as a result, interest
rate risk and changes in fair value would not have a significant impact on our cash flows related
to our fixed-rate debt until such time as we are required to refinance, repurchase or repay such
debt.
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with our mortgage loan origination services.
We manage interest rate risk through the use of forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (MBS),
Eurodollar Futures Contracts (EDFC) and put options on MBS and EDFC. Use of the term hedging
instruments in the following discussion refers to these securities collectively, or in any
combination. We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) are extended to borrowers who have applied for loan
funding and who meet defined credit and underwriting criteria. Typically, the IRLCs have a duration
of less than six months. Some IRLCs are committed immediately to a specific purchaser through the
use of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments, while other IRLCs are funded prior to being
committed to third-party purchasers. The hedging instruments related to IRLCs are classified and
accounted for as derivative instruments in an economic hedge, with gains and losses recognized in
current earnings. Hedging instruments related to funded, uncommitted loans are accounted for at
fair value, with changes recognized in current earnings, along with changes in the fair value of
the funded, uncommitted loans. The fair value change related to the hedging instruments generally
offsets the fair value change in the uncommitted loans and the fair value change, which for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was not significant, is recognized in current
earnings. At December 31, 2009, hedging instruments used to mitigate interest rate risk related to
uncommitted mortgage loans held for sale and uncommitted IRLCs totaled $179.6 million. Uncommitted
IRLCs, the duration of which are generally less than six months, totaled approximately $101.6
million, and uncommitted mortgage loans held for sale totaled approximately $87.6 million at
December 31, 2009.
At December 31, 2009, we had $13.8 million in EDFC options and MBS which were acquired as part
of a program to potentially offer homebuyers a below market interest rate on their home financing.
These hedging instruments and the related commitments are accounted for at fair value with gains and losses
recognized in current earnings. These gains and losses for the three months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 were not material.
-53-
The following table sets forth principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average
interest rates and estimated fair value of our debt obligations as of December 31, 2009. The
interest rate for our variable rate debt represents the interest rate on our mortgage repurchase
facility. Because the mortgage repurchase facility is effectively secured by certain mortgage loans
held for sale which are typically sold within 60 days, its outstanding balance is included as a
variable rate maturity in the most current period presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ amounts in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
238.8 |
|
|
$ |
361.6 |
|
|
$ |
194.7 |
|
|
$ |
295.5 |
|
|
$ |
932.2 |
|
|
$ |
269.6 |
|
|
$ |
750.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,042.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,066.6 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed in the reports the Company files, furnishes, submits or otherwise provides the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, in such a manner as to allow
timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during
the quarter ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
-54-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in lawsuits and other contingencies in the ordinary course of business. While
the outcome of such contingencies cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the
liabilities arising from these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, to the extent the liability
arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds our estimates reflected in the recorded
reserves relating to such matter, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.
On June 15, 2007, a putative class action, John R. Yeatman, et al. v. D.R. Horton, Inc., et
al., was filed by one of our customers against us and our affiliated mortgage company subsidiary in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. The complaint sought
certification of a class alleged to include persons who, within the year preceding the filing of
the suit, purchased a home from us and obtained a mortgage for such purchase from our affiliated
mortgage company subsidiary. The complaint alleged that we violated Section 8 of the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act by effectively requiring our homebuyers to use our affiliated mortgage
company to finance their home purchases by offering certain discounts and incentives. The action
sought damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. On April 23, 2008, the Court ruled
on our motion to dismiss and dismissed this complaint with prejudice. The plaintiffs appealed the
decision. On September 1, 2009, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its mandate
affirming the trial courts dismissal of the plaintiffs complaint. The time for additional appeals
has passed, thus this matter is now concluded.
On March 24, 2008, a putative class action, James Wilson, et al. v. D.R. Horton, Inc., et al.,
was filed by five customers of Western Pacific Housing, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries,
against us, Western Pacific Housing, Inc., and our affiliated mortgage company subsidiary, in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The complaint sought
certification of a class alleged to include persons who, within the four years preceding the filing
of the suit, purchased a home from us, or any of our subsidiaries, and obtained a mortgage for such
purchase from our affiliated mortgage company subsidiary. The complaint alleged that we violated
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and Sections 16720, 17200 and 17500 of the California
Business and Professions Code by effectively requiring our homebuyers to apply for a loan through
our affiliated mortgage company. In June 2009 the complaint was amended to limit the putative class
to California customers only and the claims asserted were limited to alleged violations of the
California Business and Professions Code. The complaint alleges that the homebuyers were either
deceived about loan costs charged by our affiliated mortgage company or coerced into using our
affiliated mortgage company, or both, and that discounts and incentives offered by us or our
subsidiaries to buyers who obtained financing from our affiliated mortgage company were illusory.
The action seeks treble damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. We believe the
claims alleged in this action are without merit and will defend them vigorously. Subsequent to
December 31, 2009, the plaintiffs tentatively agreed to dismiss their lawsuit in exchange for a
waiver of costs. A final settlement agreement is pending.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the risk factors previously identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2009, we are updating the following risk factor related to the
utilization of our tax losses as affected by our stockholders non-approval of the Section 382
rights agreement.
The utilization of our tax losses could be substantially limited if we experienced an ownership
change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
We experienced continuing losses through fiscal 2009 that produced net operating losses and
unrealized built-in losses for income tax purposes. To the extent they are not carried back to
prior periods, these have the potential to reduce future income tax obligations if we become
profitable in the future. However, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code contains rules that
limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change to utilize its net operating loss
carryforwards and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. Under the
rules, such an ownership change is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock
within a rolling three-year period, as calculated in accordance with the rules. The rules generally
operate by focusing on changes in ownership among stockholders considered by the rules as owning
directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of the company and any change in ownership arising
from new issuances of stock by the company.
-55-
If we undergo an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 as a result of future
transactions involving our common stock, our ability to use any of our net operating loss
carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards or net unrealized built-in losses at the time of ownership
change would be subject to the limitations of Section 382 on their use against future taxable
income. The limitation may affect the amount of our deferred income tax asset and, depending on the
limitation, a significant portion of our built-in losses, any net operating loss carryforwards or
tax credit carryforwards could expire before we would be able to use them. This could adversely
affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
We believe that we have not experienced such an ownership change as of December 31, 2009;
however, the amount by which our ownership may change in the future could be affected by purchases
and sales of stock by 5% stockholders and the conversion of our outstanding convertible senior
notes, over which we have no control, and new issuances of stock by us, should we choose to do so.
In August 2009, our Board of Directors adopted a Section 382 rights agreement as a measure intended
to deter such an ownership change while in effect in order to preserve these tax attributes. The
Section 382 rights agreement, however, may not prevent an ownership change. While the Section 382
rights agreement is in effect, it could discourage or prevent a merger, tender offer, proxy contest
or accumulations of substantial blocks of shares for which some stockholders might receive a
premium above market value. It could also adversely affect the liquidity of the market for our
shares. In January 2010, our stockholders did not approve our Section 382 rights agreement when it
was submitted to them at our annual meeting of stockholders; therefore, it will expire by its terms
on August 19, 2010 unless earlier terminated by our Board of Directors.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company held its annual stockholders meeting on January 28, 2010. At the meeting, the
Companys stockholders took the following actions: (i) elected Donald R. Horton, Bradley S.
Anderson, Michael R. Buchanan, Michael W. Hewatt, Bob G. Scott, Donald J. Tomnitz and Bill W. Wheat
as directors, (ii) did not approve the Section 382 Rights Agreement previously adopted by the Board
of Directors, and (iii) ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm.
-56-
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, of the Company dated January 31,
2006, and the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended, of the Company dated March 18, 1992. (1) |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company. (2) |
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. (3) |
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Executive Compensation Notification Chairman and CEO. (4) |
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Executive Compensation Summary Named Executive Officers. (5) |
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Director Compensation Summary. (6) |
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. (*) |
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer provided pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*) |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer provided pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*) |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certificate provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
by the Companys Chief Executive Officer. (*) |
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certificate provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
by the Companys Chief Financial Officer. (*) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on February 2, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Report on Form 8-A filed
with the SEC on August 20, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on August 5, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 23, 2009, filed with the SEC on October 29, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 18, 2009, filed with the SEC on November 20, 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 18, 2009, filed with the SEC on November 20, 2009. |
-57-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. HORTON, INC.
|
|
Date: February 2, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Bill W. Wheat
|
|
|
|
Bill W. Wheat, on behalf of D.R. Horton, Inc.,
as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
-58-