nvcsr
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-07111
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Randy Takian
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-296-6990
Date of fiscal year end: October 31, 2009
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2009
Item 1 Report to Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Welcome,
Shareholder:
In this
report, youll learn about how your investment in
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities
performed during the annual period. We will provide an overview
of the market conditions, and discuss some of the factors that
affected performance during the reporting period. In addition,
this report includes the Trusts financial statements and a
list of Trust investments.
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily
come to pass. There is no assurance that the Trust will achieve
its investment objective. The Trust is subject to market risk,
which is the possibility that market values of securities owned
by the Trust will decline and, therefore, the value of the
Trusts shares may be less than what you paid for them.
Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Trust.
Income earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
Trust Report
For the year ended October 31, 2009
Market
Conditions
The municipal market rebounded strongly in early 2009, after
struggling through one of the most challenging periods in the
history of the financial markets. Not only has the municipal
market performed solidly this year, but it has done so with less
volatility than has been seen in the taxable market.
The recovery began in March when certain economic indicators
stabilized or improved, suggesting that perhaps the contraction
in economic growth was slowing. Credit conditions also became
more favorable, thanks to the various initiatives of the Federal
Reserve and the government to inject liquidity into the
financial system. In the months that followed, positive news on
the corporate, banking and economic fronts helped bolster
investor confidence, sustaining the financial markets
rally throughout the end of October.
Strong demand for municipal bonds, a limited supply of new
issues, and renewed investor risk appetite led to marked
improvement in municipal market performance, particularly for
the higher yielding segment. Although high yield issues
underperformed early in the reporting period, they have
considerably outpaced higher quality, lower yielding issues for
much of this year. As a result, the high yield segment of the
market slightly outperformed the investment grade segment for
the overall
12-month
reporting period.
While the state of California has a large and diverse economic
base and above-average wealth levels, its large exposure to the
housing crisis, falling tax revenues and recent budgetary
shortfalls pose significant challenges. Consequently, the rating
agencies have downgraded the states credit rating and the
market has reacted accordingly. However, the negative impact has
been tempered somewhat by the increasing issuance of taxable
Build America Bonds and the continued decrease in supply of
tax-exempt debt.
Performance
Analysis
For the
12-month
period ended October 31, 2009, the net asset value (NAV) of
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities (ICS)
increased from $13.05 to $14.65 per share. Based on this change
plus reinvestment of tax-free dividends totaling $0.595 per
share, a taxable distribution of $0.002905 per share and a
long-term capital gain distribution of $0.003764 per share, the
Trusts total NAV return was 17.71 percent. ICSs
value on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) moved from $12.55 to
$13.17 per share during the same period. Based on this change
plus reinvestment of dividends and distributions, the
Trusts total market return was 10.11 percent.
ICSs NYSE market price was at a 10.10 percent
discount to its NAV. Past performance is no guarantee of
future results.
Monthly dividends for October 2009 were unchanged at $0.0475 per
share. The dividend reflects the current level of the
Trusts net investment income. ICSs level of
undistributed net investment income was $0.070 per share on
October 31, 2009 versus $0.051 per share 12 months
earlier.1
A focus on higher quality municipal securities has detracted
slightly from relative performance in recent months as lower
quality issues have outperformed in 2009. However, this
positioning enhanced returns early in the reporting period when
risk aversion and widening credit spreads led the higher quality
segment of the market to outperform lower quality, riskier
securities.
2
The portfolios focus on longer maturity issues contributed
greatly to performance in 2009 as spreads on these issues
tightened dramatically. Overweight allocations to essential
services sectors also enhanced returns during the period as
these securities have performed relatively well.
The Trusts procedure for reinvesting all dividends and
distributions in common shares is through purchases in the open
market. This method helps support the market value of the
Trusts shares. In addition, we would like to remind you
that the Trustees have approved a share repurchase program
whereby the Trust may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price
not above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at
the time of purchase.
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is
no guarantee of future results, and current performance may be
lower or higher than the figures shown. Investment return, net
asset value and common share market price will fluctuate and
Trust shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will
continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in
such sectors will be held by the Trust in the future.
1 Income
earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be subject to
the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
|
|
|
|
|
TOP FIVE SECTORS as of 10/31/09
|
|
|
General Obligation
|
|
|
26
|
.9%
|
Appropriation
|
|
|
19
|
.2
|
Dedicated Tax
|
|
|
12
|
.0
|
Public Power
|
|
|
9
|
.1
|
Education
|
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATINGS ALLOCATIONS as of 10/31/09
|
|
|
Aaa/AAA
|
|
|
4
|
.8%
|
Aa/AA
|
|
|
45
|
.0
|
A/A
|
|
|
34
|
.2
|
Non-Rated
|
|
|
5
|
.3
|
Not Insured
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
Subject to change daily. Provided for informational purposes
only and should not be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell
the securities mentioned or securities in the sectors shown
above. Top five sectors and ratings allocations are as a
percentage of total investments. Securities are classified by
sectors that represent broad groupings of related industries.
Morgan Stanley is a full-service securities firm engaged in
securities trading and brokerage activities, investment banking,
research and analysis, financing and financial advisory
services. Rating allocations based upon ratings as issued by
Standard and Poors and Moodys, respectively.
3
For More
Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Morgan Stanley trust provides a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within
60 days of the end of the trusts second and fourth
fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports
are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on
Form N-CSRS
and
Form N-CSR,
respectively. Morgan Stanley also delivers the semiannual and
annual reports to trust shareholders and makes these reports
available on its public web site, www.morganstanley.com. Each
Morgan Stanley trust also files a complete schedule of portfolio
holdings with the SEC for the trusts first and third
fiscal quarters on
Form N-Q.
Morgan Stanley does not deliver the reports for the first and
third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports
posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. You may, however,
obtain the
Form N-Q
filings (as well as the
Form N-CSR
and N-CSRS filings) by accessing the SECs web site,
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also review and copy them at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation
of the SECs public reference room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You can also request
copies of these materials, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at the SECs
e-mail
address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the public reference
section of the SEC, Washington, DC
20549-1520.
4
Investment Advisory Agreement
Approval
Nature, Extent
and Quality of Services
The Board reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the
investment advisory services provided by the Investment Adviser
(as defined herein) under the advisory agreement, including
portfolio management, investment research and equity and fixed
income securities trading. The Board also reviewed and
considered the nature and extent of the non-advisory,
administrative services provided by the Trusts
Administrator (as defined herein) under the administration
agreement, including accounting, clerical, bookkeeping,
compliance, business management and planning, and the provision
of supplies, office space and utilities at the Investment
Advisers expense. (The Investment Adviser and the
Administrator together are referred to as the
Adviser and the advisory and administration
agreements together are referred to as the Management
Agreement.) The Board also compared the nature of the
services provided by the Adviser with similar services provided
by non-affiliated advisers as reported to the Board by Lipper
Inc. (Lipper).
The Board reviewed and considered the qualifications of the
portfolio managers, the senior administrative managers and other
key personnel of the Adviser who provide the advisory and
administrative services to the Trust. The Board determined that
the Advisers portfolio managers and key personnel are well
qualified by education and/or training and experience to perform
the services in an efficient and professional manner. The Board
concluded that the nature and extent of the advisory and
administrative services provided were necessary and appropriate
for the conduct of the business and investment activities of the
Trust. The Board also concluded that the overall quality of the
advisory and administrative services was satisfactory.
Performance, Fees
and Expenses of the Trust
The Board reviewed the performance, fees and expenses of the
Trust compared to its peers, as determined by Lipper, and to
appropriate benchmarks where applicable. The Board discussed
with the Adviser the performance goals and the actual results
achieved in managing the Trust. When considering a funds
performance, the Board and the Adviser place emphasis on trends
and longer-term returns (focusing on one-year, three-year and
five-year performance, as of December 31, 2008, as
applicable). When a fund underperforms its benchmark and/or its
peer group average, the Board and the Adviser discuss the causes
of such underperformance and, where necessary, they discuss
specific changes to investment strategy or investment personnel.
The Board noted that the Trusts performance was better
than its peer group average for the one-, three- and five-year
periods. The Board discussed with the Adviser the level of the
advisory and administration fees (together, the management
fee) for this Trust relative to comparable funds advised
by the Adviser and compared to its peers as determined by
Lipper. In addition to the management fee, the Board also
reviewed the Trusts total expense ratio. The Board noted
that the management fee and total
5
expense ratio were lower than the peer group average. After
discussion, the Board concluded that the Trusts management
fee, total expense ratio and performance were competitive with
the peer group average.
Economies of
Scale
The Board considered the size and growth prospects of the Trust
and how that relates to the Trusts total expense ratio and
particularly the Trusts management fee rate, which does
not include breakpoints. In conjunction with its review of the
Advisers profitability, the Board discussed with the
Adviser how a change in assets can affect the efficiency or
effectiveness of managing the Trust and whether the management
fee level is appropriate relative to current and projected asset
levels and/or whether the management fee structure reflects
economies of scale as asset levels change. The Board considered
that, with respect to closed-end funds, the assets are not
likely to grow with new sales or grow significantly as a result
of capital appreciation. The Board concluded that economies of
scale for the Trust were not a factor that needed to be
considered at the present time.
Profitability of
the Adviser and Affiliates
The Board considered information concerning the costs incurred
and profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates during
the last year from their relationship with the Trust and during
the last two years from their relationship with the Morgan
Stanley Fund Complex and reviewed with the Adviser the cost
allocation methodology used to determine the profitability of
the Adviser and affiliates. The Board has determined that its
review of the analysis of the Advisers expenses and
profitability supports its decision to approve the Management
Agreement.
Other Benefits of
the Relationship
The Board considered other benefits to the Adviser and its
affiliates derived from their relationship with the Trust and
other funds advised by the Adviser. These benefits may include,
among other things, float benefits derived from
handling of checks for purchases and sales, research received by
the Adviser generated from commission dollars spent on
funds portfolio trading and fees for distribution and/or
shareholder servicing. The Board reviewed with the Adviser each
of these arrangements and the reasonableness of its costs
relative to the services performed. The Board has determined
that its review of the other benefits received by the Adviser or
its affiliates supports its decision to approve the Management
Agreement.
Resources of the
Adviser and Historical Relationship Between the Trust and the
Adviser
The Board considered whether the Adviser is financially sound
and has the resources necessary to perform its obligations under
the Management Agreement. The Board also reviewed and considered
the historical
6
relationship between the Trust and the Adviser, including the
organizational structure of the Adviser, the policies and
procedures formulated and adopted by the Adviser for managing
the Trusts operations and the Boards confidence in
the competence and integrity of the senior managers and key
personnel of the Adviser. The Board concluded that the Adviser
has the financial resources necessary to fulfill its obligations
under the Management Agreement and that it is beneficial for the
Trust to continue its relationship with the Adviser.
Other Factors and
Current Trends
The Board considered the controls and procedures adopted and
implemented by the Adviser and monitored by the Trusts
Chief Compliance Officer and concluded that the conduct of
business by the Adviser indicates a good faith effort on its
part to adhere to high ethical standards in the conduct of the
Trusts business.
General
Conclusion
After considering and weighing all of the above factors, the
Board concluded that it would be in the best interest of the
Trust and its shareholders to approve renewal of the Management
Agreement for another year. In reaching this conclusion the
Board did not give particular weight to any single factor
referenced above. The Board considered these factors over the
course of numerous meetings, some of which were in executive
session with only the Independent Board members and their
counsel present. It is possible that individual Board members
may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their
individual decisions to approve the Management Agreement.
7
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - October 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (106.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (105.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
Alameda County Joint Powers Authority, Ser 2008 (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
%
|
|
12/01/24
|
|
|
|
$
|
245,474
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
Alhambra Unified School District, Ser 2009 B (AGC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
59,136
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Alhambra Unified School District, Ser 2009 B (AGC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
89,240
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
Alvord Unified School District, Ser 2008 A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
188,931
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, Electric System
Ser 2007 A
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
10/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
1,842,120
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, San Francisco Bay Area
Ser F-1 (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
04/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
741,465
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, San Francisco Bay Area
Ser F-1 (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
04/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
813,482
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
Beverly Hills Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
89,335
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
Beverly Hills Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
129,925
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank,
Bay Area Toll Bridges Seismic Retrofit 1st Lien
Ser 2003 A (FGIC Insd) (ETM) (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/28
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
2,334,360
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
California State Department of Veterans Affairs, Home Purchase
Ser 2002 A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.35
|
|
|
12/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
1,512,075
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
California State Public Works Board, Department of Mental Health
Coaling Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
218,518
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
California State University, Ser 2005 A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
11/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
482,375
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
Campbell Union High School District, Election of 2006
Ser 2008 B
(AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
602,962
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Capistrano Unified School District, Community Facilities
District #98-2 Ladera Ser 2005 (NATL-RE & FGIC
Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
906,360
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City & County of San Francisco, City Buildings
Ser 2007 A (COPs)
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
901,910
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
City & County of San Francisco, Lugana Honda Hospital
Ser 2005 I
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/15/30
|
|
|
|
|
1,394,313
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
City of Fairfield, Water Financing Ser 2007 A (COPs)
(XLCA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
04/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
833,085
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
City of Los Angeles, Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
1,086,640
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
City of Redding, Electric System Ser 2008 A (COPs)
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
365,256
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
City of Riverside, Issue of 2008 D (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
10/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
513,740
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City of San Jose, Airport Ser 2001 (NATL-RE & FGIC
Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
03/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,960
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City of Simi Valley, Public Financing Authority Ser 2004
(COPs)
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
997,370
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
Clovis Unified School District, Election of 2004
Ser 2004 A
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
32,662
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
Corona-Norca Unified School District, Election of 2006
Ser 2009 B
(AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
298,025
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District, Election 2008
Ser 2009 E (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/48
|
|
|
|
|
208,237
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
El Segundo Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 A (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
146,899
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
Fontana Unified School District, Ser 2008 B (FSA
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
02/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
246,026
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Gilroy Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 A (AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
233,303
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
8
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - October 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Enhanced Asset Backed
Ser 2005 A (FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
%
|
|
06/01/38
|
|
|
|
$
|
883,860
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
Grossmont Union High School District, Ser 2006 (NATL-RE
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
333,172
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Election of 2002
Ser 2008 C (AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
259,199
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
Huntington Beach Union High School District, Ser 2004 (FSA
Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
1,319,168
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
Kern County Board of Education, Refg Ser 2006 A (COPs)
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
1,095,526
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
Kern County Water Agency Improvement District No 4,
Ser 2008 A (COPs) (AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
251,485
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
La Quinta Financing Authority, Local Agency Ser 2004 A
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
1,101,782
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Ser 2006 A
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
987,090
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power,
Ser 2001 A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/21
|
|
|
|
|
1,050,370
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp., Police Headquarters
Ser 2006 A (NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
787,352
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California,
Ser 2009 B (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
07/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
1,345,721
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Moorpark Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 A
(AGC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
515,580
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
Moreland School District, 2014 Ser C (AMBAC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
93,672
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public Financing
Authority, Election of 2006 Ser 2008 (FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
275,227
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public Financing
Authority, Election of 2006 Ser 2008 (FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
194,438
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, Oakland Administration
Buildings Ser 2008 B (AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
238,478
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Oxnard Financing Authority, Redwood Trunk Sewer &
Headworks Ser 2004 A (NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
1,001,990
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
Patterson Joint Unified School District, Election of 2008
Ser 2009 B
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
03/01/49
|
|
|
|
|
297,685
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Placer County Water Agency, Ser 2008 (COPs) (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.75
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
251,575
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
Planada Elemantary School District, Ser 2009 B (AGC
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
07/01/49
|
|
|
|
|
155,470
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
Poway Unified School District, School Facilities Improvement
District
No. 2007-1,
2008 Election Ser A (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
229,313
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
Poway Unified School District, School Facilities Improvement
District
No. 2007-1,
2008 Election Ser A (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
197,961
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Rancho Mirage Redevelopment Agency, Ser 2003 A
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
04/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
902,910
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
224,017
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
212,622
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
194,205
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
9
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - October 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,025
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School District Community Facilities District,
No. 2 Ser 2007 (NATL-RE Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
%
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,347
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
Roseville Joint Union High School District, Ser 2007 C
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
270,918
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
Sacramento City Financing Authority, 1999 Solid
Waste & Redevelopment (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
12/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
181,764
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Election Ser U (FSA
Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/15/24
|
|
|
|
|
1,069,470
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
San Bernardino Community College District,
Ser 2009 B (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/48
|
|
|
|
|
472,405
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
San Diego County Water Authority, Ser 2004 A (COPs)
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
710,759
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, Water Refg Ser A
2001
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
11/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
2,012,480
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
San Jose Evergreen Community College District, Election
Ser 2008 B
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
258,200
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
San Rafael City High School District, Election
Ser 2002 B
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
53,799
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
San Ysidro School District, 1997 Election Ser 2007 E
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
177,365
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
San Ysidro School District, 1997 Election Ser 2007 E
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
233,799
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
School Facilities Financing Authority, Grant Joint Union High
School District Ser 2008 A (FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
438,309
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
Simi Valley Unified School District, Election of 2004
Ser 2007 C
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
154,363
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
Simi Valley Unified School District, Election of 2004
Ser 2007 C
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
105,123
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Southern California Public Power Authority, Transmission Refg
Ser 2002 A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
1,076,730
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Tustin Unified School District,
No. 2002-1
Election of 2002 Ser 2008 C
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
262,077
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Twin Rivers Unified School District, Ser 2009
(BANs) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
04/01/14
|
|
|
|
|
201,023
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2007 A (NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
05/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
897,430
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2007 J (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
05/15/31
|
|
|
|
|
971,090
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2007 J (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
4
|
.50
|
|
|
05/15/35
|
|
|
|
|
527,883
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2009 O
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
05/15/39
|
|
|
|
|
526,245
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
University of California, Ser 2009 W (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
05/15/34
|
|
|
|
|
1,470,659
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Upland Unified School District, Election 2000
Ser 2001 B (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
1,036,630
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
Val Verde Unified School District of Construction,
Ser 2005 B (COPs)
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
585,218
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
Victor Valley Community College District, Election of 2008
Ser C (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/49
|
|
|
|
|
619,093
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
Washington Unified School District-Yolo County,
Ser 2004 A
(NATL-RE & FGIC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
1,418,519
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
West Basin Municipal Water District, Refg Ser 2008 B
(COPs) (AGC Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
248,626
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
Yosemite Community College District, Election of 2004
Ser 2008 C
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
235,889
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
Yosemite Community College District, Election of 2004
Ser 2008 C
(FSA Insd) (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
2,590,449
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
10
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - October 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
Yucaipa Valley Water District, Ser 2004 A (COPs)
(NATL-RE Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
%
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,017,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,888,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam (0.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
Territory of Guam Section 30, Ser A
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
12/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
95,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Ser 2009 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
249,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Loan
Diago A
|
|
|
6
|
.625
|
|
|
10/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
254,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
(Cost $53,733,125)
|
|
|
|
|
53,487,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal
Obligations (1.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
California Housing Finance Agency, Ser 2008 A (Demand
11/02/09)
|
|
|
0
|
.16
|
(e)
|
|
08/01/40
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
California State Department of Water Resources, Power Supply
Ser 2008 J (Demand 11/02/09)
|
|
|
0
|
.18
|
(e)
|
|
05/01/20
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations
(Cost $530,000)
|
|
|
|
|
530,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $54,263,125) (f)
(g)
|
|
107.6%
|
|
|
|
|
54,017,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
595,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations Related to
Securities Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes with interest rates ranging from 0.16% to 0.27% at
October 31, 2009 and contractual maturities of collateral
ranging from 04/01/26 to 05/15/34
(See Note 1D) (h)
|
|
(8.8)
|
|
|
|
|
(4,415,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
50,198,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The categories of investments are shown as a
percentage of net assets applicable to common shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANs
|
|
Bond Anticipation Notes.
|
COPs
|
|
Certificates of Participation.
|
ETM
|
|
Escrowed to Maturity.
|
(a)
|
|
Capital appreciation bond.
|
(b)
|
|
Underlying security related to inverse floater entered into
by the Trust (See Note 1D).
|
(c)
|
|
A portion of this security has been physically segregated in
connection with open futures contracts.
|
(d)
|
|
Prefunded to call date shown.
|
(e)
|
|
Current coupon of variable rate demand obligation.
|
(f)
|
|
Securities have been designated as collateral in connection
with open futures contracts and inverse floating rate municipal
obligations.
|
(g)
|
|
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is
$54,249,455. The aggregate gross unrealized appreciation is
$1,743,296 and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation is
$1,974,780 resulting in net unrealized depreciation of
$231,484.
|
(h)
|
|
Floting rate note obligations related to securities held. The
interest rates shown reflect the rates in effect at
October 31, 2009.
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
11
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio of
Investments - October 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
Bond Insurance:
|
AGC
|
|
Assured Guaranty Corporation.
|
AMBAC
|
|
AMBAC Assurance Corporation.
|
FGIC
|
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company.
|
FSA
|
|
Financial Security Assurance Inc.
|
NATL-RE
|
|
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation.
|
XLCA
|
|
XL Capital Assurance Inc.
|
Futures Contracts
Open at October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNREALIZED
|
NUMBER OF
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION, DELIVERY
|
|
UNDERLYING FACE
|
|
APPRECIATION
|
CONTRACTS
|
|
LONG/SHORT
|
|
MONTH AND YEAR
|
|
AMOUNT AT VALUE
|
|
(DEPRECIATION)
|
|
134
|
|
|
Long
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes 10 Year,
December 2009
|
|
$
|
15,893,657
|
|
|
$
|
278,453
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Long
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes 5 Year,
December 2009
|
|
|
1,280,984
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Short
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes 2 Year,
December 2009
|
|
|
(6,310,672
|
)
|
|
|
(37,515
|
)
|
|
65
|
|
|
Short
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bonds 30 Year,
December 2009
|
|
|
(7,810,156
|
)
|
|
|
32,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Appreciation
|
|
$
|
274,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
12
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Statements
Statement of
Assets and Liabilities
October 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value (cost $54,263,125)
|
|
$
|
54,017,971
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
Receivable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
648,765
|
|
Variation margin
|
|
|
20,610
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
54,694,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate note and dealer trusts obligations
|
|
|
4,415,000
|
|
Payable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
13,787
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
Transfer agent fee
|
|
|
776
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
62,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
4,495,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares of beneficial interest,
(1,000,000 shares authorized of non-participating $.01
par value, none issued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
50,198,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest (unlimited shares
authorized of $.01 par value, 3,427,554 shares
outstanding)
|
|
$
|
48,716,453
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
28,889
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
240,775
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain
|
|
|
1,212,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
50,198,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Common Share
($50,198,368 divided by 3,427,554 common shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
$14.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
13
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Statements continued
Statement of
Operations
For the year ended
October 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
2,457,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
129,475
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
94,708
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
38,363
|
|
Shareholder reports and notices
|
|
|
22,262
|
|
Listing fees
|
|
|
19,152
|
|
Transfer agent fees and expenses
|
|
|
9,878
|
|
Interest and residual trust expenses
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
Custodian fees
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
343,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
2,113,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain:
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain on:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
105,572
|
|
Futures contracts
|
|
|
1,347,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Gain
|
|
|
1,452,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,930,116
|
|
Futures contracts
|
|
|
33,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation
|
|
|
3,963,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain
|
|
|
5,416,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase
|
|
$
|
7,530,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
14
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Statements continued
Statements of
Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
|
ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
|
OCTOBER 31, 2009
|
|
OCTOBER 31, 2008
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
2,113,777
|
|
|
$
|
2,008,707
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
1,452,672
|
|
|
|
(224,162
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation
|
|
|
3,963,896
|
|
|
|
(5,404,019
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
7,530,345
|
|
|
|
(3,619,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(2,049,352
|
)
|
|
|
(2,236,146
|
)
|
Net realized gain
|
|
|
(12,901
|
)
|
|
|
(381,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dividends and Distributions
|
|
|
(2,062,253
|
)
|
|
|
(2,617,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease from transactions in common shares of beneficial
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(315,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
5,468,092
|
|
|
|
(6,552,132
|
)
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
44,730,276
|
|
|
|
51,282,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period
(Including accumulated undistributed net investment
income of $240,775 and $176,236, respectively)
|
|
$
|
50,198,368
|
|
|
$
|
44,730,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
15
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31, 2009
1. Organization
and Accounting Policies
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities (the
Trust) is registered under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, closed-end management
investment company. The Trusts investment objective is to
provide current income which is exempt from both federal and
California income taxes. The Trust was organized as a
Massachusetts business trust on October 14, 1993 and
commenced operations on February 28, 1994.
The Trust may be affected by economic and political developments
in the State of California.
Morgan Stanley announced on October 19, 2009 that it has
entered into a definitive agreement to sell substantially all of
its retail asset management business to Invesco Ltd.
(Invesco), a leading global investment management
company. As a result, the Investment Adviser expects to propose
to the Board of Trustees of the Trust that the Board approve,
among other things, a new investment advisory agreement with an
affiliate of Invesco. If approved by the Trusts Board, the
new agreement would be submitted to the Trusts
shareholders for their approval.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. Valuation of Investments
(1) portfolio securities are valued by an outside
independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. The
pricing service uses both a computerized grid matrix of
tax-exempt securities and evaluations by its staff, in each case
based on information concerning market transactions and
quotations from dealers which reflect the mean between the last
reported bid and ask price. The portfolio securities are thus
valued by reference to a combination of transactions and
quotations for the same or other securities believed to be
comparable in quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, call
provisions, trading characteristics and other features deemed to
be relevant. The Trustees believe that timely and reliable
market quotations are generally not readily available for
purposes of valuing tax-exempt securities and that the
valuations supplied by the pricing service are more likely to
represent the fair value of such securities; (2) futures
are valued at the latest sale price on the commodities exchange
on which they trade unless it is determined that such price does
not reflect their market value, in which case they will be
valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under
procedures established by and under the supervision of the
Trustees; (3) interest rate swaps are
marked-to-market
daily based upon quotations from market makers; and
(4) short-term debt securities having a maturity date of
more than sixty days at time of purchase are valued on a
mark-to-market
basis until sixty days prior to maturity and thereafter at
amortized cost based on their value on the 61st day. Short-term
debt securities having a maturity date of sixty days or less at
the time of purchase are valued at amortized cost, which
approximates market value.
B. Accounting for Investments Security
transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order
to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains and losses on
security transactions are determined by the
16
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
identified cost method. Discounts are accreted and premiums are
amortized over the life of the respective securities and are
included in interest income. Interest income is accrued daily as
earned.
C. Futures A futures contract is an agreement
between two parties to buy and sell financial instruments or
contracts based on financial indices at a set price on a future
date. Upon entering into such a contract, the Trust is required
to pledge to the broker cash, U.S. Government securities or
other liquid portfolio securities equal to the minimum initial
margin requirements of the applicable futures exchange. Pursuant
to the contract, the Trust agrees to receive from or pay to the
broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the
value of the contract. Such receipts or payments known as
variation margin are recorded by the Trust as unrealized gains
and losses. Upon closing of the contract, the Trust realizes a
gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the
contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it
was closed.
D. Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations Related
to Securities Held The Trust enters into
transactions in which it transfers to Dealer Trusts
(Dealer Trusts), fixed rate bonds in exchange for
cash and residual interests in the Dealer Trusts assets
and cash flows, which are in the form of inverse floating rate
investments. The Dealer Trusts fund the purchases of the fixed
rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes to third parties and
allowing the Trust to retain residual interest in the bonds. The
Trust enters into shortfall agreements with the Dealer Trusts
which commit the Trust to pay the Dealer Trusts, in certain
circumstances, the difference between the liquidation value of
the fixed rate bonds held by the Dealer Trusts and the
liquidation value of the floating rate notes held by third
parties, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The
residual interests held by the Trust (inverse floating rate
investments) include the right of the Trust (1) to cause
the holders of the floating rate notes to tender their notes at
par at the next interest rate reset date, and (2) to
transfer the municipal bond from the Dealer Trusts to the Trust,
thereby collapsing the Dealer Trusts. The Trust accounts for the
transfer of bonds to the Dealer Trusts as secured borrowings,
with the securities transferred remaining in the Trusts
investment assets, and the related floating rate notes reflected
as Trust liabilities under the caption floating rate note
and dealer trusts obligations on the Statement of Assets
and Liabilities. The Trust records the interest income from the
fixed rate bonds under the caption interest income
and records the expenses related to floating rate note and
dealer trusts obligations and any administrative expenses of the
Dealer Trusts under the caption interest and residual
trust expenses on the Statement of Operations. The
floating rate notes issued by the Dealer Trusts have interest
rates that reset weekly and the floating rate note holders have
the option to tender their notes to the Dealer Trusts for
redemption at par at each reset date. At October 31, 2009,
the Trusts investments with a value of $6,961,776 are held
by the Dealer Trusts and serve as collateral for the $4,415,000
in floating rate note and dealer trusts obligations outstanding
at that date. The range of contractual maturities of the
17
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
floating rate note and dealer trusts obligations and interest
rates in effect at October 31, 2009 are presented in the
Portfolio of Investments.
E. Interest Rate Swaps Interest rate swaps
are contractual agreements to exchange periodic interest payment
streams calculated on a predetermined notional principal amount.
Interest rate swaps generally involve one party paying a fixed
interest rate and the other party paying a variable rate. The
Trust will usually enter into interest rate swaps on a net
basis, i.e., the two payment streams are netted out in a cash
settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the
instrument, with the Trust receiving or paying, as the case may
be, only the net amount of the two payments. The Trust accrues
the net amount with respect to each interest rate swap on a
daily basis. This net amount is recorded within realized
gains/losses on swap contracts on the Statement of Operations.
Swap agreements are not entered into or traded on exchanges and
there is no central clearing or guaranty function for swaps.
Therefore, swaps are subject to the risk of default or
non-performance by the counterparty. If there is a default by
the counterparty to a swap agreement, the Trust will have
contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the
transaction. Counterparties are required to pledge collateral
daily (based on the valuation of each swap) on behalf of the
Trust with a value approximately equal to the amount of any
unrealized gain. Reciprocally, when the Trust has an unrealized
loss on a swap contract, the Trust has instructed the custodian
to pledge cash or liquid securities as collateral with a value
approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss.
Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if
and when the swap valuations fluctuate. For cash collateral
received, the Trust pays a monthly fee to the counterparty based
on the effective rate for Federal Funds.
F. Federal Income Tax Policy It is the
Trusts policy to comply with the requirements of
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially
all of its taxable and non-taxable income to its shareholders.
Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. The
Trust files tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service,
New York State and New York City. The Trust recognizes the tax
effects of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return only if it is more likely than not to be sustained based
solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The
more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each
reporting period to support continued recognition of the
benefit. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in
the financial statements for a tax position taken and the tax
benefit claimed in the income tax return is referred to as an
unrecognized tax benefit. There are no unrecognized tax benefits
in the accompanying financial statements. If applicable, the
Trust recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax
benefits in interest expense and penalties in other expenses in
the Statement of Operations. Each of the tax years in the four
year period ended October 31, 2009, remains subject to
examination by taxing authorities.
18
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
The Trust purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the
opinion of the issuer, is free from federal income tax. There is
no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
will agree with this opinion. In the event the IRS determines
that the issuer does not comply with relevant tax requirements,
interest payments from a security could become federally taxable.
G. Dividends and Distributions to
Shareholders Dividends and distributions to
shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
H. Use of Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
I. Subsequent Events The Trust considers
events or transactions that occur after the date of the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities but before the financial
statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to
certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional
disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated through
December 24, 2009, the date of issuance of these financial
statements.
2. Fair Valuation
Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that the Trust would receive
to sell an investment or pay to transfer a liability in a timely
transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market,
or in the absence of a principal market the most advantageous
market for the investment or liability. GAAP utilizes a
three-tier hierarchy to distinguish between (1) inputs that
reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable
inputs) and (2) inputs that reflect the reporting
entitys own assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances (unobservable inputs) and to establish
classification of fair value measurements for disclosure
purposes. Various inputs are used in determining the value of
the Trusts investments. The inputs are summarized in the
three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical investments
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including the Trusts own assumptions in determining the
fair value of investments)
|
19
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities and the determination of the significance of
a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety
requires judgment and considers factors specific to each
security.
The following is the summary of the inputs used as of
October 31, 2009 in valuing the Trusts investments
carried at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT OCTOBER 31, 2009 USING
|
|
|
|
|
UNADJUSTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUOTED PRICES IN
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVE MARKET FOR
|
|
OTHER OBSERVABLE
|
|
UNOBSERVABLE
|
|
|
|
|
IDENTICAL INVESTMENTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
INVESTMENT TYPE
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
(LEVEL 1)
|
|
(LEVEL 2)
|
|
(LEVEL 3)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
53,487,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,487,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations
|
|
|
530,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
311,558
|
|
|
$
|
311,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,329,529
|
|
|
$
|
311,558
|
|
|
$
|
54,017,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
$
|
(37,515
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Derivative
Financial Instruments
A derivative financial instrument in very general terms refers
to a security whose value is derived from the value
of an underlying asset, reference rate or index.
The Trust may use derivative instruments for a variety of
reasons, such as to attempt to protect the Trust against
possible changes in the market value of its portfolio or to
generate potential gain. All of the Trusts portfolio
holdings, including derivative instruments, are
marked-to-market
each day with the change in value reflected in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation. Upon disposition, a realized gain or
loss is recognized accordingly, except when taking delivery of a
security underlying a contract. In these instances, the
recognition of gain or loss is postponed until the disposal of
the security underlying the contract. Risk may arise as a result
of the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the
terms of their contracts.
Summarized below are specific types of derivative financial
instruments used by the Trust.
Futures To hedge against adverse
interest rate changes, the Trust may invest in financial futures
contracts or municipal bond index futures contracts
(futures contracts). These futures contracts involve
elements of market risk in excess of the amount reflected in the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Trust bears the risk of
an unfavorable change in the value of the underlying securities.
Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the
potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of
their contracts.
20
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
Transactions in futures contracts for the year ended
October 31, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF
|
|
|
CONTRACTS
|
|
Futures, outstanding at beginning of the period
|
|
|
397
|
|
Futures opened
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
Futures closed
|
|
|
(2,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures, outstanding at end of the period
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps The Trust may enter
into interest rate swaps and may purchase or sell interest rate
caps, floors and collars. The Trust expects to enter into these
transactions primarily to manage interest rate risk, hedge
portfolio positions and preserve a return or spread on a
particular investment or portion of its portfolio. The Trust may
also enter into these transactions to protect against any
increase in the price of securities the Trust anticipates
purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swap transactions are
subject to market risk, risk of default by the other party to
the transaction, risk of imperfect correlation and manager risk.
Such risks may exceed the related amounts shown in the Statement
of Assets and Liabilities.
There were no transactions in interest rate swaps for the year
ended October 31, 2009.
The following table sets forth the fair value of the
Trusts derivative contracts by primary risk exposure as of
October 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSET DERIVATIVES
|
|
|
|
LIABILITY DERIVATIVES
|
|
|
PRIMARY RISK EXPOSURE
|
|
BALANCE SHEET LOCATION
|
|
FAIR VALUE
|
|
BALANCE SHEET LOCATION
|
|
FAIR VALUE
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
Variation margin
|
|
$
|
311,558
|
|
|
Variation margin
|
|
$
|
(37,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includes cumulative
appreciation/depreciation of futures contracts as reported in
the Portfolio of Investments. Only current days variation
margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities.
|
The following tables set forth by primary risk exposure the
Trusts realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized
gains (losses) by type of derivative contract for the year ended
October 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT OF REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
|
PRIMARY RISK EXPOSURE
|
|
FUTURES
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
$
|
1,347,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN UNREALIZED APPRECIATION/DEPRECIATION ON DERIVATIVE
CONTRACTS
|
PRIMARY RISK EXPOSURE
|
|
FUTURES
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
$
|
33,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
4. Investment
Advisory/Administration Agreements
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Investment Advisors Inc. (the Investment Adviser),
the Trust pays an advisory fee, calculated weekly and payable
monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.27% to the
Trusts average weekly net assets.
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Services Company Inc. (the Administrator), an
affiliate of the Investment Adviser, the Trust pays an
administration fee, calculated weekly and payable monthly, by
applying the annual rate of 0.08% to the Trusts average
weekly net assets.
Under an agreement between the Administrator and State Street
Bank and Trust Company (State Street), State
Street provides certain administrative services to the Trust.
For such services, the Administrator pays State Street a portion
of the fee the Administrator receives from the Trust.
5. Security
Transactions and Transactions with Affiliates
The cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio
securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended
October 31, 2009 aggregated $14,741,735 and $7,562,657,
respectively. Included in the aforementioned transactions is a
purchase in the amount of $230,000 with another Morgan Stanley
fund.
The Trust has an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan (the
Compensation Plan) which allows each independent
Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or
she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees. Each eligible
Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts
credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more
of the Morgan Stanley funds that are offered as investment
options under the Compensation Plan. Appreciation/depreciation
and distributions received from these investments are recorded
with an offsetting increase/decrease in the deferred
compensation obligation and do not affect the net asset value of
the Trust.
6. Preferred
Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Trust is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000
non-participating preferred shares of beneficial interest having
a par value of $.01 per share, in one or more series, with
rights as determined by the Trustees, without approval of the
common shareholders. The preferred shares have a liquidation
value of $50,000 per share plus the redemption premium, if any,
plus accumulated but unpaid dividends, whether or not declared,
thereon to the date of distribution. The Trust may redeem such
shares, in whole or in part, at the original purchase price of
$50,000 per share plus accumulated but unpaid dividends, whether
or not declared, thereon to the date of redemption.
The Trust is subject to certain restrictions relating to the
preferred shares. Failure to comply with these restrictions
could preclude the Trust from declaring any distributions to
common shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could
trigger the mandatory redemption of preferred shares at
liquidation value.
22
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
The preferred shares, which are entitled to one vote per share,
generally vote with the common shares but vote separately as a
class to elect two Trustees and on any matters affecting the
rights of the preferred shares.
As of October 31, 2009, there were no preferred shares
outstanding.
7. Common Shares
of Beneficial Interest
Transactions in common shares of beneficial interest were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAID IN
|
|
|
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
|
EXCESS OF
|
|
|
SHARES
|
|
OF SHARES
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
Balance, October 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,450,072
|
|
|
$
|
34,501
|
|
|
$
|
48,996,974
|
|
Shares repurchased (weighted average discount 5.53%)+++
|
|
|
(22,518
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(314,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,427,554
|
|
|
|
34,276
|
|
|
|
48,682,177
|
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2009
|
|
|
3,427,554
|
|
|
$
|
34,276
|
|
|
$
|
48,682,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustees have approved a share repurchase program whereby
the Trust may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price not
above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at the
time of purchase.
|
|
|
+++
|
|
The Trustees have voted to retire
the shares purchased.
|
8. Dividends to
Common Shareholders
The Trust declared the following dividends from net investment
income subsequent to October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECLARATION
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
RECORD
|
|
PAYABLE
|
DATE
|
|
PER SHARE
|
|
DATE
|
|
DATE
|
November 10, 2009
|
|
$0.0475
|
|
November 20, 2009
|
|
November 27, 2009
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
$0.0475
|
|
December 18, 2009
|
|
December 24, 2009
|
9. Expense
Offset
The expense offset represents a reduction of the fees and
expenses for interest earned on cash balances maintained by the
Trust with the transfer agent and custodian. For the year ended
October 31, 2009, the Trust did not have an expense offset.
10. Purposes of
and Risks Relating to Certain Financial Instruments
The Trust may invest a portion of its assets in inverse floating
rate municipal securities, which are variable debt instruments
that pay interest at rates that move in the opposite direction
of prevailing interest rates. These investments are typically
used by the Trust in seeking to enhance the yield of the
portfolio or used as
23
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
an alternative form of leverage in order to redeem a portion of
the Trusts preferred shares. Inverse floating rate
investments tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds
in a rising interest rate environment, but tend to outperform
the market for fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or
remain relatively stable. Inverse floating rate investments have
varying degrees of liquidity. Inverse floating rate securities
in which the Trust may invest include derivative instruments
such as residual interest bonds (RIBs) or tender
option bonds (TOBs). Such instruments are typically
created by a special purpose trust that holds long-term fixed
rate bonds (which may be tendered by the Trust in certain
instances) and sells two classes of beneficial interests:
short-term floating rate interests, which are sold to third
party investors, and inverse floating residual interests, which
are purchased by the Trust. The short-term floating rate
interests have first priority on the cash flow from the bonds
held by the special purpose trust and the Trust is paid the
residual cash flow from the bonds held by the special purpose
trust.
The Trust generally invests in inverse floating rate investments
that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Trust to
greater risks and increased costs. The market value of a
leveraged inverse floating rate investment generally
will fluctuate in response to changes in market rates of
interest to a greater extent than the value of an unleveraged
investment. The extent of increases and decreases in the value
of inverse floating rate investments generally will be larger
than changes in an equal principal amount of a fixed rate
security having similar credit quality, redemption provisions
and maturity, which may cause the Trusts net asset value
to be more volatile than if it had not invested in inverse
floating rate investments.
In certain instances, the short-term floating rate interests
created by the special purpose trust may not be able to be sold
to third parties or, in the case of holders tendering (or
putting) such interests for repayment of principal, may not be
able to be remarketed to third parties. In such cases, the
special purpose trust holding the long-term fixed rate bonds may
be collapsed. In the case of RIBs or TOBs created by the
contribution of long-term fixed income bonds by the Trust, the
Trust will then be required to repay the principal amount of the
tendered securities. During times of market volatility,
illiquidity or uncertainty, the Trust could be required to sell
other portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time to raise cash
to meet that obligation.
The Trust may also invest in private placement securities. TOBs
are presently classified as private placement securities.
Private placement securities are subject to restrictions on
resale because they have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or are otherwise not readily
marketable. As a result of the absence of a public trading
market for these securities, they may be less liquid than
publicly traded securities. Although these securities may be
resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized
from these sales could be less than those originally paid by the
Trust or less than what may be considered the fair value of such
securities.
24
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
11. Federal
Income Tax Status
The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment
income and net realized capital gains are determined in
accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ
from generally accepted accounting principles. These
book/tax differences are either considered temporary
or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are
permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the
capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment;
temporary differences do not require reclassification. Dividends
and distributions which exceed net investment income and net
realized capital gains for tax purposes are reported as
distributions of
paid-in-capital.
The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
|
ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
|
OCTOBER 31, 2009
|
|
OCTOBER 31, 2008
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
2,039,395
|
|
|
$
|
2,161,965
|
|
Ordinary income
|
|
|
9,957
|
|
|
|
74,181
|
|
Long-term capital gains
|
|
|
12,901
|
|
|
|
381,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions
|
|
$
|
2,062,253
|
|
|
$
|
2,617,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2009, the tax-basis components of
accumulated earnings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
226,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed ordinary income
|
|
|
554,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed long-term gains
|
|
|
932,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net accumulated earnings
|
|
|
1,713,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary differences
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(231,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated earnings
|
|
$
|
1,481,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2009, the Trust had temporary book/tax
differences primarily attributable to book amortization of
discounts on debt securities, mark-to-market of open futures
contracts and tax adjustments on inverse floaters.
Permanent differences, due to nondeductible expenses, resulted
in the following reclassifications among the Trusts
components of net assets at October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED
|
|
ACCUMULATED
|
|
|
UNDISTRIBUTED NET
|
|
UNDISTRIBUTED
|
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME
|
|
NET REALIZED GAIN
|
|
PAID-IN-CAPITAL
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(114)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Notes to
Financial Statement - October 31,
2009 continued
12. Accounting
Pronouncement
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
new guidance related to Transfers and Servicing. The new
guidance is intended to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness and comparability of the information that a
reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a
transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. The new guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2009 and earlier application is
prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of this
guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the
effective date. Additionally, the disclosure provisions of this
guidance should be applied to transfers that occurred both
before and after the effective date. The impact of this new
guidance on the Trusts financial statements, if any, is
currently being assessed.
26
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Financial
Highlights
Selected ratios and per share data for a common share of
beneficial interest outstanding throughout each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Selected Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
|
|
$13.05
|
|
|
|
|
$14.86
|
|
|
|
|
$15.15
|
|
|
|
|
$15.17
|
|
|
|
|
$15.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from Investment Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment
income(1)
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
(1.65
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from investment operations
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less dividends and distributions from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
Net realized gain
|
|
|
0.00
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends and distributions
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of acquiring treasury
shares(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period
|
|
|
$14.65
|
|
|
|
|
$13.05
|
|
|
|
|
$14.86
|
|
|
|
|
$15.15
|
|
|
|
|
$15.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value, end of period
|
|
|
$13.17
|
|
|
|
|
$12.55
|
|
|
|
|
$14.19
|
|
|
|
|
$14.06
|
|
|
|
|
$13.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Return(2)
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
%
|
|
|
(6.46
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
%
|
|
|
7.68
|
|
%
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
%
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets of Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses (before expense offset)
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.66%(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.76%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.61%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.62%(4
|
)
|
|
Total expenses (before expense offset, exclusive of interest and
residual trust expenses)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.66%(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.62%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.61%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.62%(4
|
)
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
%
|
Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period, in
thousands
|
|
|
$50,198
|
|
|
|
|
$44,730
|
|
|
|
|
$51,282
|
|
|
|
|
$52,872
|
|
|
|
|
$54,413
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
16
|
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The per share amounts were
computed using an average number of shares outstanding during
the period. |
(2) |
|
Total return is based upon the
current market value on the last day of each period reported.
Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the
prices obtained under the Trusts dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return does not reflect brokerage
commissions. |
(3) |
|
Does not reflect the effect of
expense offset of 0.02%. |
(4) |
|
Does not reflect the effect of
expense offset of 0.01%. |
(5) |
|
Amount is less than
0.01. |
See Notes to Financial
Statements
27
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal
Securities:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and
liabilities of Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal
Securities (the Trust), including the portfolio of
investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related
statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements
of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period
then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five
years in the period then ended. These financial statements and
financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trusts
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial highlights based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The
Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of
October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and
brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities as of
October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for
the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of
the two years in the period then ended, and the financial
highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended,
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
December 24, 2009
28
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Shareholder
Voting Results (unaudited)
On June 17, 2009, an annual meeting of the Trusts
shareholders was held for the purpose of voting on the following
matter, the results of which were as follows:
Election of
Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstain
|
Kathleen A. Dennis
|
|
3,276,881
|
|
|
70,965
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Manuel H. Johnson
|
|
3,240,210
|
|
|
107,636
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns
|
|
3,276,881
|
|
|
70,965
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Fergus Reid
|
|
3,276,881
|
|
|
70,965
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Special
Shareholder Meeting Results (unaudited)
On November 14, 2008, a Special Meeting of Shareholders of
the Trust was scheduled in order to vote on the proposals set
forth below. The voting results with respect to these proposals
were as follows:
(1) Approval of a modification to the Trusts
investment policies to allow the Trust to invest, under normal
market conditions, at least 80% of the Trusts net assets
in municipal obligations which are covered by insurance
guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest
thereon and that are rated at least A by a
nationally recognized statistical rating organization
(NRSRO) or are unrated but judged to be of similar
credit quality by the Trusts Investment Adviser, or
covered by insurance issued by insurers rated at least
A by a NRSRO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
BNV*
|
|
|
|
1,690,121
|
|
|
|
206,471
|
|
|
|
110,658
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Approval of a modification to the Trusts
investment policies to allow the Trust to invest up to 20% of
the Trusts net assets in taxable or tax-exempt fixed
income securities rated at least investment grade by a
nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if not
rated, determined by the Trusts Investment Adviser to be
of comparable quality, including uninsured municipal
obligations, obligations of the U.S. government, its respective
agencies or instrumentalities, and other fixed income
obligations, and, during periods in which the Investment Adviser
believes that changes in economic, financial or political
conditions
29
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Special
Shareholder Meeting Results
(unaudited) continued
make it advisable to do so, to invest an unlimited extent in
such investments for temporary defensive purposes. The Trust may
also invest in options, futures, swaps and other derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
BNV*
|
|
|
|
1,676,224
|
|
|
|
218,728
|
|
|
|
112,298
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Eliminate
certain fundamental policies and restrictions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
BNV*
|
Eliminate fundamental policy restricting the Trusts
ability to pledge assets
|
|
1,380,230
|
|
|
489,268
|
|
|
|
137,752
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy restricting purchases of securities
on margin
|
|
1,385,670
|
|
|
489,488
|
|
|
|
132,092
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy prohibiting investments in oil, gas
and other types of mineral leases
|
|
1,395,881
|
|
|
475,292
|
|
|
|
136,077
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy prohibiting investments for
purposes of exercising control
|
|
1,397,609
|
|
|
476,289
|
|
|
|
133,352
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy regarding investments in unseasoned
companies
|
|
1,383,929
|
|
|
487,569
|
|
|
|
135,752
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy prohibiting or restricting the
purchase of securities of issuers in which trustees or officers
have an interest
|
|
1,365,591
|
|
|
510,066
|
|
|
|
131,593
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy regarding purchase of common stock
|
|
1,396,429
|
|
|
483,515
|
|
|
|
127,306
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy regarding the purchase or sale of
puts, calls and combinations thereof
|
|
1,377,018
|
|
|
497,334
|
|
|
|
132,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy regarding the short sale of
securities
|
|
1,380,622
|
|
|
498,205
|
|
|
|
128,423
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Eliminate fundamental policy prohibiting investments in other
investment companies
|
|
1,412,547
|
|
|
472,224
|
|
|
|
122,479
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
(4) Modify
certain fundamental investment policies and
restrictions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
BNV*
|
Modify fundamental policy regarding borrowing money
|
|
1,396,804
|
|
|
483,928
|
|
|
|
126,518
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Modify fundamental policy regarding loans
|
|
1,398,903
|
|
|
477,545
|
|
|
|
130,802
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Modify fundamental policy regarding investment in commodities
|
|
1,393,384
|
|
|
483,721
|
|
|
|
130,145
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Modify fundamental policy regarding issuance of senior securities
|
|
1,422,343
|
|
|
453,792
|
|
|
|
131,115
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Broker non-votes are
shares held in street name for which the broker indicates that
instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners
or other persons entitled to vote and for which the broker does
not have discretionary voting authority. |
30
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Revised
Investment Policies (unaudited)
Effective October 13, 2009, the Board of Trustees of the
Trust approved a change to the Trusts investment practice
to permit the Trust to invest, without limit, in private
placement securities in order to enhance portfolio management
flexibility in managing the Trust.
Derivatives
Policy
The Trust has amended and restated its policy on derivatives to
permit it to invest in the derivative investments discussed
below.
The Trust may use derivative instruments for a variety of
purposes, including hedging, risk management, portfolio
management or to earn income. Derivatives are financial
instruments whose value is based on the value of another
underlying asset, interest rate, index or financial instrument.
A derivative instrument often has risks similar to its
underlying instrument and may have additional risks, including
imperfect correlation between the value of the derivative and
the underlying instrument, risks of default by the other party
to certain transactions, magnification of losses incurred due to
changes in the market value of the securities, instruments,
indices or interest rates to which they relate, and risks that
the transactions may not be liquid. The use of derivatives
involves risks that are different from, and possibly greater
than, the risks associated with other portfolio investments.
Derivatives may involve the use of highly specialized
instruments that require investment techniques and risk analyses
different from those associated with other portfolio
investments. Certain derivative transactions may give rise to a
form of leverage. Leverage associated with derivative
transactions may cause the Trust to liquidate portfolio
positions when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy
its obligations or to meet earmarking or segregation
requirements, pursuant to applicable SEC rules and regulations,
or may cause the Trust to be more volatile than if the Trust had
not been leveraged. Although the Investment Adviser seeks to use
derivatives to further the Trusts investment objective,
there is no assurance that the use of derivatives will achieve
this result.
Following is a description of the derivative instruments and
techniques that the Trust may use and their associated risks:
Futures. A futures contract is a standardized
agreement between two parties to buy or sell a specific quantity
of an underlying instrument at a specific price at a specific
future time. The value of a futures contract tends to increase
and decrease in tandem with the value of the underlying
instrument. Futures contracts are bilateral agreements, with
both the purchaser and the seller equally obligated to complete
the transaction. Depending on the terms of the particular
contract, futures contracts are settled through either physical
delivery of the underlying instrument on the settlement date or
by payment of a cash settlement amount on the settlement date. A
decision as to whether, when and how to use futures involves the
exercise of skill and judgment and even a well conceived futures
transaction may be unsuccessful because of market behavior or
unexpected events. In addition to the derivatives risks
discussed above, the prices of futures can
31
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Revised
Investment Policies
(unaudited) continued
be highly volatile, using futures can lower total return, and
the potential loss from futures can exceed the Trusts
initial investment in such contracts.
Swaps. A swap contract is an agreement between
two parties pursuant to which the parties exchange payments at
specified dates on the basis of a specified notional amount,
with the payments calculated by reference to specified
securities, indexes, reference rates, currencies or other
instruments. Most swap agreements provide that when the period
payment dates for both parties are the same, the payments are
made on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted
out, with only the net amount paid by one party to the other).
The Trusts obligations or rights under a swap contract
entered into on a net basis will generally be equal only to the
net amount to be paid or received under the agreement, based on
the relative values of the positions held by each counterparty.
Swap agreements are not entered into or traded on exchanges and
there is no central clearing or guaranty function for swaps.
Therefore, swaps are subject to credit risk or the risk of
default or non-performance by the counterparty. Swaps could
result in losses if interest rate or foreign currency exchange
rates or credit quality changes are not correctly anticipated by
the Trust or if the reference index, security or investments do
not perform as expected.
Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate
obligations are obligations which pay interest at rates that
vary inversely with changes in market rates of interest. Because
the interest rate paid to holders of such obligations is
generally determined by subtracting a variable or floating rate
from a predetermined amount, the interest rate paid to holders
of such obligations will decrease as such variable or floating
rate increases and increase as such variable or floating rate
decreases. Like most other fixed-income securities, the value of
inverse floaters will decrease as interest rates increase. They
are more volatile, however, than most other fixed-income
securities because the coupon rate on an inverse floater
typically changes at a multiple of the change in the relevant
index rate. Thus, any rise in the index rate (as a consequence
of an increase in interest rates) causes a correspondingly
greater drop in the coupon rate of an inverse floater while a
drop in the index rate causes a correspondingly greater increase
in the coupon of an inverse floater. Some inverse floaters may
also increase or decrease substantially because of changes in
the rate of prepayments.
Inverse Floating Rate Municipal Obligations.
The inverse floating rate municipal obligations in which the
Trust may invest include derivative instruments such as residual
interest bonds (RIBs) or tender option bonds
(TOBs). Such instruments are typically created by a
special purpose trust that holds long-term fixed rate bonds and
sells two classes of beneficial interests: short-term floating
rate interests, which are sold to third party investors, and
inverse floating residual interests, which are purchased by the
Trust. The short-term floating rate interests have first
priority on the cash flow from the bond held by the special
purpose trust and the Trust is paid the residual cash flow from
the bond held by the special purpose trust.
Inverse floating rate investments are variable debt instruments
that pay interest at rates that move in the opposite direction
of prevailing interest rates. Inverse floating rate investments
tend to underperform the
32
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Revised
Investment Policies
(unaudited) continued
market for fixed rate bonds in a rising interest rate
environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate
bonds when interest rates decline or remain relatively stable.
Inverse floating rate investments have varying degrees of
liquidity.
The Trust generally invests in inverse floating rate investments
that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Trust to
greater risks and increased costs. The market value of a
leveraged inverse floating rate investment generally
will fluctuate in response to changes in market rates of
interest to a greater extent than the value of an unleveraged
investment. The extent of increases and decreases in the value
of inverse floating rate investments generally will be larger
than changes in an equal principal amount of a fixed rate
security having similar credit quality, redemption provisions
and maturity, which may cause the Trusts net asset value
to be more volatile than if it had not invested in inverse
floating rate investments.
In certain instances, the short-term floating rate interests
created by the trust may not be able to be sold to third parties
or, in the case of holders tendering (or putting) such interests
for repayment of principal, may not be able to be remarketed to
third parties. In such cases, the trust holding the long-term
fixed rate bonds may be collapsed. In the case of floaters
created by the Trust, the Trust will then be required to repay
the principal amount of the tendered securities. During times of
market volatility, illiquidity or uncertainty, the Trust could
be required to sell other portfolio holdings at a
disadvantageous time to raise cash to meet that obligation.
33
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Portfolio
Management (unaudited)
As of the date of this report, the Trust is managed within the
Morgan Stanley Municipals team. The team consists of portfolio
managers and analysts. Current members of the team jointly and
primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Trusts portfolio are Thomas Byron, an Executive Director
of the Investment Adviser, Neil Stone, a Managing, Director of
the Investment Adviser, Robert J. Stryker, an Executive Director
of the Investment Adviser and Robert W. Wimmel, an Executive
Director of the Investment Adviser.
Mr. Byron has been associated with the Investment Adviser
or its investment advisory affiliates in an investment
management capacity since 1981 and began managing the Trust in
December 2009. Mr. Stone has been associated with the
Investment Adviser or its investment advisory affiliates in an
investment management capacity since 1995 and began managing the
Trust in September 2007. Mr. Stryker has been associated
with the Investment Adviser or its investment advisory
affiliates in an investment management capacity since 1994 and
began managing the Trust in December 2009. Mr. Wimmel has
been associated with the Investment Adviser or its investment
advisory affiliates in an investment management capacity since
1996 and began managing the Trust in December 2009.
The composition of the team may change from time to time.
34
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan (unaudited)
The dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) offers you a prompt
and simple way to reinvest your dividends and capital gains
distributions (Distributions) into additional shares of the
Trust. Under the Plan, the money you earn from Distributions
will be reinvested automatically in more shares of the Trust,
allowing you to potentially increase your investment over time.
Plan
benefits
Add
to your account
You may increase your shares in the Trust easily and
automatically with the Plan.
Low
transaction costs
Transaction costs are low because the new shares are bought in
blocks and the brokerage commission is shared among all
participants.
Convenience
You will receive a detailed account statement from Computershare
Trust Company, N.A., (the Agent) which administers the
Plan. The statement shows your total Distributions, dates of
investment, shares acquired, and price per share, as well as the
total number of shares in your reinvestment account. You can
also access your account at morganstanley.com/im.
Safekeeping
The Agent will hold the shares it has acquired for you in
safekeeping.
How to
participate in the Plan
If you own shares in your own name, you can participate directly
in the Plan. If your shares are held in street
name in the name of your brokerage firm,
bank, or other financial institution you must
instruct that entity to participate on your behalf. If they are
unable to participate on your behalf, you may request that they
reregister your shares in your own name so that you may enroll
in the Plan.
If you choose to participate in the Plan, whenever the Trust
declares a distribution, it will be invested in additional
shares of the Trust that are purchased in the open market.
How to
enroll
To enroll in the Plan, please read the Terms and Conditions in
the Plan brochure. You can obtain a copy of the Plan Brochure
and enroll in the Plan by visiting morganstanley.com/im, calling
toll-free
(888) 421-4015
or notifying us in writing at Morgan Stanley Closed-End Funds,
Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078,
Providence, Rl
02940-3078.
Please include the Trust name and account number and ensure that
all shareholders listed on the account sign the written
instructions. Your participation in the Plan will begin with the
next Distribution payable after the Agent receives your
authorization, as long as they receive it
35
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
(unaudited) continued
before the record date, which is generally one week
before the dividend is paid. If your authorization arrives after
such record date, your participation in the Plan will begin with
the following Distribution.
Costs of the
plan
There is no direct charge to you for reinvesting dividends and
capital gains distributions because the Plans fees are
paid by the Trust. However, when applicable, you will pay your
portion of any brokerage commissions incurred when the new
shares are purchased on the open market. These brokerage
commissions are typically less than the standard brokerage
charges for individual transactions, because shares are
purchased for all participants in blocks, resulting in lower
commissions for each individual participant. Any brokerage
commissions or service fees are averaged into the purchase price.
Tax
implications
The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains
distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be
due on dividends or capital gains distributions. You will
receive tax information annually to help you prepare your
federal and state income tax returns.
Morgan Stanley does not offer tax advice. The tax information
contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. It
was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by
any taxpayer, for avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the
taxpayer under U.S. federal tax laws. Federal and state tax laws
are complex and constantly changing. Shareholders should always
consult a legal or tax advisor for Information concerning their
individual situation.
How to withdraw
from the Plan
To withdraw from the Plan, please visit morganstanley.com/im or
call
(888) 421-4015
or notify us in writing at the address below.
Morgan Stanley Closed-End Funds
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rl
02940-3078
All shareholders listed on the account must sign any written
withdrawal instructions. If you withdraw, you have three options
with regard to the shares held in your account:
|
|
1.
|
If you opt to continue to hold your non-certificated shares,
whole shares will be held by the Agent and fractional shares
will be sold.
|
2.
|
If you opt to sell your shares through the Agent, we will sell
all full and fractional shares and send the proceeds via check
to your address of record after deducting brokerage commissions.
|
36
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
(unaudited) continued
|
|
3. |
You may sell your shares through your financial advisor through
the Direct Registration System (DRS). DRS is a service within
the securities industry that allows Trust shares to be held in
your name in electronic format. You retain full ownership of
your shares, without having to hold a stock certificate.
|
The Trust and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. at any
time may amend or terminate the Plan. Participants will receive
written notice at least 30 days before the effective date
of any amendment. In the case of termination, Participants will
receive written notice at least 30 days before the record
date for the payment of any dividend or capital gains
distribution by the Trust. In the case of amendment or
termination necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable
law or the rules and policies of the Securities and Exchange
Commission or any other regulatory authority, such written
notice will not be required.
To obtain a complete copy of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan,
please call our Client Relations department at
888-421-4015
or visit morganstanley.com/im.
37
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited)
We are required by federal law to provide you with a copy of our
privacy policy (Policy) annually.
This Policy applies to current and former individual clients of
certain Morgan Stanley closed-end funds and related companies.
This Policy is not applicable to partnerships, corporations,
trusts or other non-individual clients or account holders, nor
is this Policy applicable to individuals who are either
beneficiaries of a trust for which we serve as trustee or
participants in an employee benefit plan administered or advised
by us. This Policy is, however, applicable to individuals who
select us to be a custodian of securities or assets in
individual retirement accounts, 401(k) accounts, 529 Educational
Savings Accounts, accounts subject to the Uniform Gifts to
Minors Act, or similar accounts. We may amend this Policy at any
time, and will inform you of any changes to this Policy as
required by law.
We Respect Your
Privacy
We appreciate that you have provided us with your personal
financial information and understand your concerns about
safeguarding such information. We strive to maintain the privacy
of such information while we help you achieve your financial
objectives. This Policy describes what non-public personal
information we collect about you, how we collect it, when we may
share it with others, and how others may use it. It discusses
the steps you may take to limit our sharing of information about
you with affiliated Morgan Stanley companies (affiliated
companies). It also discloses how you may limit our
affiliates use of shared information for marketing
purposes. Throughout this Policy, we refer to the non-public
information that personally identifies you or your accounts as
personal information.
1. What Personal
Information Do We Collect About You?
To better serve you and manage our business, it is important
that we collect and maintain accurate information about you. We
obtain this information from applications and other forms you
submit to us, from your dealings with us, from consumer
reporting agencies, from our websites and from third parties and
other sources.
For
example:
|
|
|
We collect information such as your name, address,
e-mail
address, telephone/fax numbers, assets, income and investment
objectives through application forms you submit to us.
|
|
|
We may obtain information about account balances, your use of
account(s) and the types of products and services you prefer to
receive from us through your dealings and transactions with us
and other sources.
|
|
|
We may obtain information about your creditworthiness and credit
history from consumer reporting agencies.
|
38
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy
Policy (unaudited) continued
|
|
|
We may collect background information from and through
third-party vendors to verify representations you have made and
to comply with various regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
If you interact with us through our public and private Web
sites, we may collect information that you provide directly
through online communications (such as an
e-mail
address). We may also collect information about your Internet
service provider, your domain name, your computers
operating system and Web browser, your use of our Web sites and
your product and service preferences, through the use of
cookies. Cookies recognize your computer
each time you return to one of our sites, and help to improve
our sites content and personalize your experience on our
sites by, for example, suggesting offerings that may interest
you. Please consult the Terms of Use of these sites for more
details on our use of cookies.
|
2. When Do We
Disclose Personal Information We Collect About You?
To provide you with the products and services you request, to
better serve you, to manage our business and as otherwise
required or permitted by law, we may disclose personal
information we collect about you to other affiliated companies
and to non-affiliated third parties.
A. Information We Disclose to Our Affiliated
Companies. In order to manage your account(s)
effectively, including servicing and processing your
transactions, to let you know about products and services
offered by us and affiliated companies, to manage our business,
and as otherwise required or permitted by law, we may disclose
personal information about you to other affiliated companies.
Offers for products and services from affiliated companies are
developed under conditions designed to safeguard your personal
information.
B. Information We Disclose to Third
Parties. We do not disclose personal information
that we collect about you to non-affiliated third parties except
to enable them to provide marketing services on our behalf, to
perform joint marketing agreements with other financial
institutions, and as otherwise required or permitted by law. For
example, some instances where we may disclose information about
you to third parties include: for servicing and processing
transactions, to offer our own products and services, to protect
against fraud, for institutional risk control, to respond to
judicial process or to perform services on our behalf. When we
share personal information with a non-affiliated third party,
they are required to limit their use of personal information
about you to the particular purpose for which it was shared and
they are not allowed to share personal information about you
with others except to fulfill that limited purpose or as may be
required by law.
3. How Do We
Protect The Security and Confidentiality Of Personal Information
We Collect About You?
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural security
measures to help safeguard the personal information we collect
about you. We have internal policies governing the proper
handling of client information. Third parties that provide
support or marketing services on our behalf may also receive
personal
39
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy
Policy (unaudited) continued
information about you, and we require them to adhere to
confidentiality standards with respect to such information.
|
|
4.
|
How Can You Limit
Our Sharing Of Certain Personal Information About You With Our
Affiliated Companies For Eligibility Determination?
|
We respect your privacy and offer you choices as to whether we
share with our affiliated companies personal information that
was collected to determine your eligibility for products and
services such as credit reports and other information that you
have provided to us or that we may obtain from third parties
(eligibility information). Please note that, even if
you direct us not to share certain eligibility information with
our affiliated companies, we may still share your personal
information, including eligibility information, with those
companies under circumstances that are permitted under
applicable law, such as to process transactions or to service
your account. We may also share certain other types of personal
information with affiliated companies such as your
name, address, telephone number,
e-mail
address and account number(s), and information about your
transactions and experiences with us.
|
|
5.
|
How Can You Limit
the Use of Certain Personal Information About You by our
Affiliated Companies for Marketing?
|
You may limit our affiliated companies from using certain
personal information about you that we may share with them for
marketing their products or services to you. This information
includes our transactions and other experiences with you such as
your assets and account history. Please note that, even if you
choose to limit our affiliated companies from using certain
personal information about you that we may share with them for
marketing their products and services to you, we may still share
such personal information about you with them, including our
transactions and experiences with you, for other purposes as
permitted under applicable law.
6. How Can You
Send Us an Opt-Out Instruction?
If you wish to limit our sharing of certain personal information
about you with our affiliated companies for eligibility
purposes and for our affiliated companies use in
marketing products and services to you as described in this
notice, you may do so by:
|
|
|
Calling us at
(888) 421-4015
Monday-Friday between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. (EST)
|
|
|
Writing to us at the following address:
Morgan Stanley Closed-End Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
40
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy
Policy (unaudited) continued
If you choose to write to us, your written request should
include: your name, address, telephone number and account
number(s) to which the opt-out applies and should not be sent
with any other correspondence. In order to process your request,
we require that the request be provided by you directly and not
through a third party. Once you have informed us about your
privacy preferences, your opt-out preference will remain in
effect with respect to this Policy (as it may be amended) until
you notify us otherwise. If you are a joint account owner, we
will accept instructions from any one of you and apply those
instructions to the entire account. Please allow approximately
30 days from our receipt of your opt-out for your
instructions to become effective.
Please understand that if you opt-out, you and any joint account
holders may not receive certain Morgan Stanley or our affiliated
companies products and services that could help you manage
your financial resources and achieve your investment objectives.
If you have more than one account with us or our affiliates, you
may receive multiple privacy policies from us, and would need to
follow the directions stated in each particular policy for each
account you have with us.
Special Notice To
Residents Of Vermont
This section supplements our Policy with respect to our
individual clients who have a Vermont address and supersedes
anything to the contrary in the above Policy with respect to
those clients only.
The State of Vermont requires financial institutions to obtain
your consent prior to sharing personal information that they
collect about you with affiliated companies and non-affiliated
third parties other than in certain limited circumstances.
Except as permitted by law, we will not share personal
information we collect about you with non-affiliated third
parties or other affiliated companies unless you provide us with
your written consent to share such information
(opt-in).
If you wish to receive offers for investment products and
services offered by or through other affiliated companies,
please notify us in writing at the following address:
Morgan Stanley Closed-End Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
Your authorization should include: your name, address, telephone
number and account number(s) to which the opt-in applies and
should not be sent with any other correspondence. In order to
process your authorization, we require that the authorization be
provided by you directly and not through a third-party.
41
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Trustee and Officer Information (unaudited)
Independent
Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Overseen
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Independent
|
|
Other Directorships
|
Independent Trustee
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Trustee**
|
|
Held by Independent Trustee
|
|
Frank L. Bowman (64)
c/o Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counsel to the Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
August 2006
|
|
President, Strategic Decisions, LLC (consulting) (since February
2009); Director or Trustee of various Retail Funds and
Institutional Funds (since August 2006); Chairperson of the
Insurance Sub-Committee of the Compliance and Insurance
Committee (since February 2007); served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Nuclear Energy Institute (policy
organization) through November 2008; retired as Admiral, U.S.
Navy in January 2005 after serving over 8 years as Director of
the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program and Deputy
AdministratorNaval Reactors in the National Nuclear
Security Administration at the U.S. Department of Energy
(1996-2004),
Knighted as Honorary Knight Commander of the Most Excellent
Order of the British Empire; Awarded the Officer de lOrde
National du Mérite by the French Government.
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
Director of the Armed Services YMCA of the USA; member, BP
America External Advisory Council (energy); member, National
Academy of Engineers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Bozic (68)
c/o Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
April 1994
|
|
Private investor; Chairperson of the Compliance and Insurance
Committee (since October 2006); Director or Trustee of the
Retail Funds (since April 1994) and Institutional Funds (since
July 2003); formerly, Chairperson of the Insurance Committee
(July 2006-September 2006); Vice Chairman of Kmart Corporation
(December
1998-October
2000), Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Levitz Furniture
Corporation (November 1995-November 1998) and President and
Chief Executive Officer of Hills Department Stores (May
1991-July
1995); variously Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer (1987-1991) of the Sears Merchandise
Group of Sears, Roebuck & Co.
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
Director of various business organizations.
|
42
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Trustee and Officer Information
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Overseen
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Independent
|
|
Other Directorships
|
Independent Trustee
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Trustee**
|
|
Held by Independent Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen A. Dennis (56)
c/o Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
August 2006
|
|
President, Cedarwood Associates (mutual fund and investment
management consulting) (since July 2006); Chairperson of the
Money Market and Alternatives Sub-Committee of the Investment
Committee (since October 2006) and Director or Trustee of
various Retail Funds and Institutional Funds (since August
2006); formerly, Senior Managing Director of Victory Capital
Management
(1993-2006).
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
Director of various non-profit organizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson (60)
c/o Johnson
Smick Group, Inc.
888 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 740
Washington, D.C. 20006
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
July 1991
|
|
Senior Partner, Johnson Smick International, Inc. (consulting
firm); Chairperson of the Investment Committee (since October
2006) and Director or Trustee of the Retail Funds (since July
1991) and Institutional Funds (since July 2003); Co-Chairman and
a founder of the Group of Seven Council (G7C) (international
economic commission); formerly, Chairperson of the Audit
Committee (July
1991-September
2006); Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
Director of NVR, Inc. (home construction); Director of Evergreen
Energy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns (67)
c/o Kearns &
Associates LLC
PMB754
23852 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90265
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
August 1994
|
|
President, Kearns & Associates LLC (investment consulting);
Chairperson of the Audit Committee (since October 2006) and
Director or Trustee of the Retail Funds (since July 2003) and
Institutional Funds (since August 1994); formerly, Deputy
Chairperson of the Audit Committee (July 2003-September 2006)
and Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Institutional Funds
(October 2001-July 2003); CFO of the J. Paul Getty Trust.
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
Director of Electro Rent Corporation (equipment leasing) and The
Ford Family Foundation.
|
43
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Trustee and Officer Information
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Overseen
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Independent
|
|
Other Directorships
|
Independent Trustee
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Trustee**
|
|
Held by Independent Trustee
|
|
Michael F. Klein (50)
c/o Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counsel to the Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
August 2006
|
|
Managing Director, Aetos Capital, LLC (since March 2000) and
Co-President, Aetos Alternatives Management, LLC (since January
2004); Chairperson of the Fixed Income Sub-Committee of the
Investment Committee (since October 2006) and Director or
Trustee of various Retail Funds and Institutional Funds (since
August 2006); formerly, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley &
Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management,
President, Morgan Stanley Institutional Funds (June
1998-March
2000) and Principal, Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management (August 1997-December
1999).
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
Director of certain investment funds managed or sponsored by
Aetos Capital, LLC. Director of Sanitized AG and Sanitized
Marketing AG (specialty chemicals).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael E. Nugent (73)
c/o Triumph
Capital, L.P.
445 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
|
|
Chairperson of the Board and Trustee
|
|
Chairperson of the Boards
since
July 2006
and Trustee
since
July 1991
|
|
General Partner, Triumph Capital, L.P. (private investment
partnership); Chairperson of the Boards of the Retail Funds and
Institutional Funds (since July 2006); Director or Trustee of
the Retail Funds (since July 1991) and Institutional Funds
(since July 2001); formerly, Chairperson of the Insurance
Committee (until July 2006).
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Allen Reed (61)
c/o Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counsel to the Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
August 2006
|
|
Chairperson of the Equity Sub-Committee of the Investment
Committee (since October 2006) and Director or Trustee of
various Retail Funds and Institutional Funds (since August
2006); formerly, President and CEO of General Motors Asset
Management; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the GM Trust
Bank and Corporate Vice President of General Motors Corporation
(August
1994-December
2005).
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
Director of Temple-Inland Industries (packaging and forest
products); Director of Legg Mason, Inc. and Director of the
Auburn University Foundation.
|
44
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Trustee and Officer Information
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Overseen
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Independent
|
|
Other Directorships
|
Independent Trustee
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Trustee**
|
|
Held by Independent Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fergus Reid (77)
c/o Lumelite
Plastics Corporation
85 Charles Colman Blvd.
Pawling, NY 12564
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
June 1992
|
|
Chairman of Lumelite Plastics Corporation; Chairperson of the
Governance Committee and Director or Trustee of the Retail Funds
(since July 2003) and Institutional Funds (since June 1992).
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
Trustee and Director of certain investment companies in the
JPMorgan Funds complex managed by JP Morgan Investment
Management Inc.
|
Interested
Trustee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Overseen
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Interested
|
|
Other Directorships
|
Interested Trustee
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Trustee**
|
|
Held by Interested Trustee
|
|
James F. Higgins (61)
c/o Morgan
Stanley Trust
Harborside Financial Center
Plaza Two
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
June 2000
|
|
Director or Trustee of the Retail Funds (since June 2000) and
Institutional Funds (since July 2003); Senior Advisor of Morgan
Stanley (since August 2000).
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
Director of AXA Financial, Inc. and The Equitable Life Assurance
Society of the United States (financial services).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
This is the earliest date the
Trustee began serving the funds advised by Morgan Stanley
Investment Advisors Inc. (the Investment Adviser)
(the Retail Funds) or the funds advised by Morgan
Stanley Investment Management Inc. and Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP
(the Institutional Funds). |
** |
|
The Fund Complex includes
all open-end and closed-end funds (including all of their
portfolios) advised by the Investment Adviser and any funds that
have an investment adviser that is an affiliated person of the
Investment Adviser (including, but not limited to, Morgan
Stanley Investment Management Inc.). |
|
|
For the period
September 26, 2008 through February 5, 2009,
W. Allen Reed was an Interested Trustee. At all other times
covered by this report, Mr. Reed was an Independent
Trustee. |
45
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Trustee and Officer Information
(unaudited) continued
Executive
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Takian (35)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
President and Principal Executive Officer
|
|
Since September 2008
|
|
President and Principal Executive Officer (since September
2008) of funds in the Fund Complex; President and
Chief Executive Officer of Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc.
(since September 2008). President of the Investment Adviser
(since July 2008). Head of the Retail and Intermediary business
within Morgan Stanley Investment Management (since July 2008).
Head of Liquidity and Bank Trust business (since July
2008) and the Latin American franchise (since July
2008) at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. Managing
Director, Director
and/or
Officer of the Investment Adviser and various entities
affiliated with the Investment Adviser. Formerly Head of
Strategy and Product Development for the Alternatives Group and
Senior Loan Investment Management. Formerly with Bank of America
(July 1996-March 2006), most recently as Head of the
Strategy, Mergers and Acquisitions team for Global Wealth and
Investment Management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Klingert (47)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Since June 2008
|
|
Head, Chief Operating Officer and acting Chief Investment
Officer of the Global Fixed Income Group of Morgan Stanley
Investment Management Inc. and the Investment Adviser (since
April 2008). Head of Global Liquidity Portfolio Management and
co-Head of Liquidity Credit Research of Morgan Stanley
Investment Management (since December 2007). Managing Director
of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. and the Investment
Adviser (since December 2007). Previously, Managing Director on
the Management Committee and head of Municipal Portfolio
Management and Liquidity at BlackRock (October 1991 to January
2007).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Otto (46)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Since October 2004
|
|
Managing Director and Global Head of Compliance for Morgan
Stanley Investment Management (since April 2007) and Chief
Compliance Officer of the Retail Funds and Institutional Funds
(since October 2004). Formerly, U.S. Director of Compliance
(October 2004-April 2007) and Assistant Secretary and Assistant
General Counsel of the Retail Funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanie V. Chang Yu (43)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Since December 1997
|
|
Managing Director and Secretary of the Investment Adviser and
various entities affiliated with the Investment Adviser; Vice
President of the Retail Funds (since July 2002) and
Institutional Funds (since December 1997).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francis J. Smith (44)
c/o Morgan
Stanley Trust
Harborside Financial Center
Plaza Two
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Treasurer since July 2003 and Chief Financial Officer since
September 2002
|
|
Executive Director of the Investment Adviser and various
entities affiliated with the Investment Adviser; Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Retail Funds (since July 2003).
Formerly, Vice President of the Retail Funds (September 2002 to
July 2003).
|
46
Morgan Stanley Insured
California Municipal Securities
Trustee and Officer Information
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
Name, Age and Address of
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary E. Mullin (42)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Secretary
|
|
Since June 1999
|
|
Executive Director of the Investment Adviser and various
entities affiliated with the Investment Adviser; Secretary of
the Retail Funds (since July 2003) and Institutional Funds
(since June 1999).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
This is the earliest date the
Officer began serving the Retail Funds or Institutional
Funds. |
In accordance with Section 303A.12(a) of the New York
Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, the Trusts Annual
CEO Certification certifying as to compliance with NYSEs
Corporate Governance Listing Standards was submitted to the
Exchange on July 14, 2009.
The Trusts Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer Certifications required by Section 302 of
the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 were filed with the Trusts N-CSR and are
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Web
site at http://www.sec.gov.
2009 Federal Tax Notice (unaudited)
For Federal income tax purposes, the following information is
furnished with respect to the distributions paid by the Trust
during its taxable year ended October 31, 2009. The
Trust designated 99.51% of its income dividends as tax-exempt
income dividends. The Trust designated and paid $12,901 as a
long-term capital gain distribution.
In January, the Trust provides tax information to shareholders
for the preceding calendar year.
47
Trustees
Michael Bozic
Kathleen A. Dennis
James F. Higgins
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson
Joseph J. Kearns
Michael F. Klein
Michael E. Nugent
W. Allen Reed
Fergus Reid
Officers
Chairperson of the
Board
Randy Takian
President
and Principal
Executive Officer
Kevin Klingert
Vice President
Carsten Otto
Chief Compliance
Officer
Stefanie V. Chang Yu
Vice President
Francis J. Smith
Treasurer
and Chief Financial
Officer
Mary E. Mullin
Secretary
Transfer Agent
Computershare
Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Two World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281
Legal Counsel
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Counsel to the Independent
Trustees
Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Investment Adviser
Morgan
Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10036
(c)
2009 Morgan Stanley
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
Morgan
Stanley
Insured
California
Municipal
Securities
NYSE:
ICS
Annual Report
October 31,
2009
ICSANN
IU09-05458P-Y10/09
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) The Trust/Fund has adopted a code of ethics (the Code of Ethics) that applies to its
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are
employed by the Trust/Fund or a third party.
(b) |
|
No information need be disclosed pursuant to this paragraph. |
|
(c) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(d) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(e) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(f) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Trust/Funds Code of Ethics is attached hereto as Exhibit 12 A. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Not applicable. |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Funds Board of Trustees has determined that Joseph J. Kearns, an independent Trustee, is an
audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. Under applicable securities
laws, a person who is determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an
expert for any purpose, including without limitation for the purposes of Section 11 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being designated or identified as an audit committee
financial expert. The designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial
expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations, or liabilities that are greater than
the duties, obligations, and liabilities imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee
and Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a)(b)(c)(d) and (g). Based on fees billed for the periods shown:
2
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
Covered Entities(1) |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
38,450 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
|
(2) |
|
$ |
6,909,000 |
(2) |
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
5,501 |
(3) |
|
$ |
1,013,000 |
(4) |
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total Non-Audit Fees |
|
$ |
5,501 |
|
|
$ |
7,922,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
43,951 |
|
|
$ |
7,922,000 |
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
Covered Entities(1) |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
38,775 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
6,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
6,418,000 |
(2) |
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
5,501 |
(3) |
|
$ |
881,000 |
(4) |
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
(5) |
Total Non-Audit Fees |
|
$ |
11,501 |
|
|
$ |
7,299,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,276 |
|
|
$ |
7,299,000 |
|
N/A - Not applicable, as not required by Item 4.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Covered Entities include the Adviser (excluding sub-advisors) and
any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser
that provides ongoing services to the Registrant. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-Related Fees represent assurance and related services provided
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the financial
statements of the Covered Entities and funds advised by the Adviser or its
affiliates, specifically data verification and agreed-upon procedures related
to asset securitizations and agreed-upon procedures engagements. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax Fees represent tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice
services provided in connection with the preparation and review of the
Registrants tax returns. |
|
(4) |
|
Tax Fees represent tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice
services provided in connection with the review of Covered Entities tax
returns. |
|
(5) |
|
All other fees represent project management for future business
applications and improving business and operational processes. |
3
(e)(1) The audit committees pre-approval policies and procedures are as follows:
APPENDIX A
AUDIT COMMITTEE
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
PRE-APPROVAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES
OF THE
MORGAN STANLEY RETAIL AND INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS
AS ADOPTED AND AMENDED JULY 23, 2004,1
1. Statement of Principles
The Audit Committee of the Board is required to review and, in its sole discretion, pre-approve all
Covered Services to be provided by the Independent Auditors to the Fund and Covered Entities in
order to assure that services performed by the Independent Auditors do not impair the auditors
independence from the Fund.
The SEC has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not
provide to its audit client, as well as the audit committees administration of the engagement of
the independent auditor. The SECs rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving
services, which the SEC considers to be equally valid. Proposed services either: may be
pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee
(general pre-approval); or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee or
its delegate (specific pre-approval). The Audit Committee believes that the combination
of these two approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to
pre-approve services performed by the Independent Auditors. As set forth in this Policy, unless a
type of service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the
Audit Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval authority has been
delegated) if it is to be provided by the Independent Auditors. Any proposed services exceeding
pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee.
The appendices to this Policy describe the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and All Other services that
have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is 12
months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers and provides a different
period and states otherwise. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services
that may be provided by the Independent Auditors without obtaining specific pre-approval from the
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add to or subtract from the list of general pre-approved
services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
|
|
|
1 |
|
This Audit Committee Audit and Non-Audit Services
Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures (the Policy), adopted as of the
date above, supersedes and replaces all prior versions that may have been
adopted from time to time. |
4
The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the policy and procedures by which the Audit Committee
intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committees
responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the Independent Auditors to management.
The Funds Independent Auditors have reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of the
Policy will not adversely affect the Independent Auditors independence.
2. Delegation
As provided in the Act and the SECs rules, the Audit Committee may delegate either type of
pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is
delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
3. Audit Services
The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees are subject to the specific pre-approval of the
Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other procedures
required to be performed by the Independent Auditors to be able to form an opinion on the Funds
financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural reviews
and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal control,
and consultations relating to the audit. The Audit Committee will approve, if necessary, any
changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, Fund structure or
other items.
In addition to the annual Audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit
Committee may grant general pre-approval to other Audit services, which are those services that
only the Independent Auditors reasonably can provide. Other Audit services may include statutory
audits and services associated with SEC registration statements (on Forms N-1A, N-2, N-3, N-4,
etc.), periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in
connection with securities offerings.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Audit services in Appendix B.1. All other Audit services
not listed in Appendix B.1 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or by any
member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
4. Audit-related Services
Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of the Funds financial statements and, to the extent they are
Covered Services, the Covered Entities or that are traditionally performed by the Independent
Auditors. Because the Audit Committee believes that the provision of Audit-related services does
not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor
independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to Audit-related services.
Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations related to accounting,
financial reporting or disclosure matters
5
not classified as Audit services; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting
and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit
procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with
financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and assistance with internal control
reporting requirements under Forms N-SAR and/or N-CSR.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Audit-related services in Appendix B.2. All other
Audit-related services not listed in Appendix B.2 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit
Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
5. Tax Services
The Audit Committee believes that the Independent Auditors can provide Tax services to the Fund
and, to the extent they are Covered Services, the Covered Entities, such as tax compliance, tax
planning and tax advice without impairing the auditors independence, and the SEC has stated that
the Independent Auditors may provide such services.
Pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the Tax Services in
Appendix B.3. All Tax services in Appendix B.3 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit
Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
6. All Other Services
The Audit Committee believes, based on the SECs rules prohibiting the Independent Auditors from
providing specific non-audit services, that other types of non-audit services are permitted.
Accordingly, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those permissible
non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine and recurring
services, would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SECs rules
on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the All Other services in Appendix B.4. Permissible All Other
services not listed in Appendix B.4 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or by
any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
7. Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts
Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the Independent
Auditors will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding
these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in
determining whether to pre-approve any such services.
8. Procedures
All requests or applications for services to be provided by the Independent Auditors that do not
require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Funds Chief Financial
Officer and must include a detailed description of the services to be
6
rendered. The Funds Chief Financial Officer will determine whether such services are included
within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the
Independent Auditors. Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval
by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the Independent Auditors
and the Funds Chief Financial Officer, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their
view, the request or application is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has designated the Funds Chief Financial Officer to monitor the performance of
all services provided by the Independent Auditors and to determine whether such services are in
compliance with this Policy. The Funds Chief Financial Officer will report to the Audit Committee
on a periodic basis on the results of its monitoring. Both the Funds Chief Financial Officer and
management will immediately report to the chairman of the Audit Committee any breach of this Policy
that comes to the attention of the Funds Chief Financial Officer or any member of management.
9. Additional Requirements
The Audit Committee has determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its
responsibility to oversee the work of the Independent Auditors and to assure the auditors
independence from the Fund, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the Independent
Auditors delineating all relationships between the Independent Auditors and the Fund, consistent
with Independence Standards Board No. 1, and discussing with the Independent Auditors its methods
and procedures for ensuring independence.
10. Covered Entities
Covered Entities include the Funds investment adviser(s) and any entity controlling, controlled by
or under common control with the Funds investment adviser(s) that provides ongoing services to the
Fund(s). Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6, 2003, the
Funds audit committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also
to the Covered Entities if the engagements relate directly to the operations and financial
reporting of the Fund. This list of Covered Entities would include:
Morgan Stanley Retail Funds
Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
Morgan Stanley DW Inc.
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Private Limited
Morgan Stanley Asset & Investment Trust Management Co., Limited
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company
Van Kampen Asset Management
Morgan Stanley Services Company, Inc.
Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc.
Morgan Stanley Trust FSB
7
Morgan Stanley Institutional Funds
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Private Limited
Morgan Stanley Asset & Investment Trust Management Co., Limited
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
Morgan Stanley Distribution, Inc.
Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP
Morgan Stanley Alternative Investment Partners LP
(e)(2) Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6, 2003, the audit
committee also is required to pre-approve services to Covered Entities to the extent that the
services are determined to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the
Registrant. 100% of such services were pre-approved by the audit committee pursuant to the Audit
Committees pre-approval policies and procedures (attached hereto).
(f) Not applicable.
(g) See table above.
(h) The audit committee of the Board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of
services other than audit services performed by the auditors to the Registrant and Covered Entities
is compatible with maintaining the auditors independence in performing audit services.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
(a) The Fund has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act whose members are:
Joseph Kearns, Michael Nugent and Allen Reed.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 6.
(a) See Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
8
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
The Fund/Trust invests in exclusively non-voting securities and therefore this item is not
applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities (ICS)
Fund Management
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. As of the date of this report, the Fund is managed within the Morgan Stanley
Municipals team. The team consists of portfolio managers and analysts. Current members of the team
jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds portfolio are Thomas
Byron, a Vice President of the Investment Adviser, Neil Stone, a Managing Director of the
Investment Adviser, Robert J. Stryker, a Vice President of the Investment Adviser and Robert W.
Wimmel, an Executive Director of the Investment Adviser.
Mr. Byron has been associated with the Investment Adviser or its investment advisory affiliates in
an investment management capacity since 1981 and began managing the Fund in December 2009. Mr.
Stone has been associated with the Investment Adviser or its investment advisory affiliates in an
investment management capacity since 1995 and began managing the Fund in September 2007. Mr.
Stryker has been associated with the Investment Adviser or its investment advisory affiliates in an
investment management capacity since 1994 and began managing the Fund in December 2009. Mr. Wimmel
has been associated with the Investment Adviser or its investment management affiliates in an
investment management capacity since 1996 and began managing the Fund in December 2009.
The composition of the team may change from time to time.
OTHER ACCOUNTS MANAGED BY THE PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
The following information is as of October 31, 2009:
Neil Stone managed 17 registered investment companies with a total of approximately $4.2
billion in assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies;
and 50 other accounts with a total of approximately $9.6 billion in assets.
The following information is as of December 7, 2009:
Thomas Byron managed 27 registered investment companies with a total of approximately $11.0 billion
in assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies; and two other
accounts with a total of approximately $29.0 million in assets.
Robert J. Stryker managed 32 registered investment companies with a total of approximately
$11.9 billion in assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment
companies; and two other accounts with a total of approximately $29.0 million in assets.
Robert W. Wimmel managed 28 registered investment companies with a total of approximately $11.7
billion in assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies; and
two other accounts with a total of approximately $29.0 million in assets.
9
Because the portfolio managers manages assets for other investment companies, pooled investment
vehicles and/or other accounts (including institutional clients, pension plans and certain high net
worth individuals), there may be an incentive to favor one client over another resulting in
conflicts of interest. For instance, the Investment Adviser may receive fees from certain accounts
that are higher than the fee it receives from the Fund, or it may receive a performance-based fee
on certain accounts. In those instances, the portfolio manager may have an incentive to favor the
higher and/or performance-based fee accounts over the Fund. In addition, a conflict of interest
could exist to the extent the Investment Adviser has proprietary investments in certain accounts,
where portfolio managers have personal investments in certain accounts or when certain accounts are
investment options in the Investment Advisers employee benefits and/or deferred compensation
plans. The portfolio managers may have an incentive to favor these accounts over others. If the
Investment Adviser manages accounts that engage in short sales of securities of the type in which
the Fund invests, the Investment Adviser could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for
the benefit of the accounts engaging in short sales if the short sales cause the market value of
the securities to fall. The Investment Adviser has adopted trade allocation and other policies and
procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to address these and other conflicts of
interest.
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMPENSATION STRUCTURE
Portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation,
comprising a cash bonus and several deferred compensation programs described below. The methodology
used to determine portfolio manager compensation is applied across all funds/accounts managed by
the portfolio managers.
BASE SALARY COMPENSATION. Generally, portfolio managers receive base salary compensation based
on the level of their position with the Investment Adviser.
DISCRETIONARY COMPENSATION. In addition to base compensation, portfolio managers may receive
discretionary compensation.
Discretionary compensation can include:
|
|
|
Cash Bonus. |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanleys Long Term Incentive Compensation awards a mandatory program that
defers a portion of discretionary year-end compensation into restricted stock units or
other awards based on Morgan Stanley common stock or other investments that are subject
to vesting and other conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Investment Management Alignment Plan (IMAP) awards a mandatory program that defers
a portion of discretionary year-end compensation and notionally invests it in
designated funds advised by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates. The award is
subject to vesting and other conditions. Portfolio managers must notionally invest a
minimum of 25% to a maximum of 100% of their IMAP deferral account into a combination
of the designated funds they manage that are included in the IMAP fund menu, which may
or may not include the Fund. For 2008 awards, a clawback provision was implemented
that could be triggered if the individual engages in conduct detrimental to the
Investment Adviser or its affiliates. |
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plans voluntary programs that permit certain
employees to elect to defer a portion of their discretionary year-end compensation and
notionally invest the deferred amount across a range of designated investment funds,
including funds advised by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates. |
Several factors determine discretionary compensation, which can vary by portfolio management
team and circumstances. In order of relative importance, these factors include:
|
|
|
Investment performance. A portfolio managers compensation is linked to the pre-tax
investment performance of the funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager.
Investment performance is calculated for one-, three- and five-year periods measured
against a |
10
|
|
|
funds/accounts primary benchmark (as set forth in the funds prospectus), indices
and/or peer groups where applicable. Generally, the greatest weight is placed on the
three- and five-year periods. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues generated by the investment companies, pooled investment vehicles and other
accounts managed by the portfolio manager. |
|
|
|
|
Contribution to the business objectives of the Investment Adviser. |
|
|
|
|
The dollar amount of assets managed by the portfolio manager. |
|
|
|
|
Market compensation survey research by independent third parties. |
|
|
|
|
Other qualitative factors, such as contributions to client objectives. |
|
|
|
|
Performance of Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Investment Management, and the
overall performance of the investment team(s) of which the portfolio manager is a
member. |
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
The portfolio managers do not own any shares of the Fund.
11
Item 9. Closed-End Fund Repurchases
REGISTRANT PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units) |
|
of Shares (or |
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Units) that May |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
(b) Average |
|
Announced |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Units) |
|
Price Paid per |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share (or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
or Programs |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
12
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Trusts/Funds principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded
that the Trusts/Funds disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Trust/Fund in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, based upon such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a) The Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers is attached hereto.
(b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the registrant are attached hereto as part of
EX-99.CERT.
13
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Morgan Stanley Insured California Municipal Securities
|
|
|
/s/ Randy Takian
Randy Takian
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
December 17, 2009 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
/s/ Randy Takian
Randy Takian
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
December 17, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis Smith
Francis Smith
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer
December 17, 2009 |
|
|
14