Form 10-K
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
THE COMPANY
Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is a diversified global financial services holding company whose businesses
provide a broad range of financial services to consumer and corporate customers. Citigroup has more than 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 100 countries. Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State
of Delaware.
The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and
subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Some of the Companys subsidiaries are subject to supervision and examination by their respective federal and state authorities. At December 31, 2006,
the Company had approximately 144,000 full-time and 10,000 part-time employees in the United States and approximately 183,000 full-time employees outside the United States. The Company has completed certain
strategic business acquisitions and divestitures during the past three years, details of which can be found in Notes 2 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements on pages 137 and 138, respectively.
The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New
York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Companys Web site at www.citigroup.com. Citigroups annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its
current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports are available free of charge through the Companys Web site by clicking on the Investor Relations page and selecting SEC Filings. The Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) Web site contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company at www.sec.gov.
Citigroup is managed along the following segment and product lines:
The following are the six regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the product
results.
2
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
89,615 |
|
|
$ |
83,642 |
|
|
$ |
79,635 |
|
|
$ |
71,594 |
|
|
$ |
66,246 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
52,021 |
|
|
|
45,163 |
|
|
|
49,782 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
35,886 |
|
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
7,955 |
|
|
|
9,046 |
|
|
|
7,117 |
|
|
|
8,924 |
|
|
|
10,972 |
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes, minority interest, and cumulative effect of accounting changes |
|
$ |
29,639 |
|
|
$ |
29,433 |
|
|
$ |
22,736 |
|
|
$ |
25,170 |
|
|
$ |
19,388 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
6,464 |
|
|
|
7,838 |
|
|
|
6,615 |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes |
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
|
|
$ |
17,058 |
|
|
$ |
12,682 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes (1) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of taxes (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
$ |
17,853 |
|
|
$ |
15,276 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
|
$ |
3.34 |
|
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
Net income |
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
|
Net income |
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
At December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,494,037 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,264,032 |
|
|
$ |
1,097,590 |
|
Total deposits (3) |
|
|
712,041 |
|
|
|
591,828 |
|
|
|
561,513 |
|
|
|
473,614 |
|
|
|
430,530 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
288,494 |
|
|
|
217,499 |
|
|
|
207,910 |
|
|
|
162,702 |
|
|
|
126,927 |
|
Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts (4) |
|
|
9,579 |
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
6,209 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
118,783 |
|
|
|
111,412 |
|
|
|
108,166 |
|
|
|
96,889 |
|
|
|
85,318 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
119,783 |
|
|
|
112,537 |
|
|
|
109,291 |
|
|
|
98,014 |
|
|
|
86,718 |
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common stockholders equity (5) |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
Return on total stockholders equity (5) |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Return on risk capital (6) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (6) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
8.59 |
% |
|
|
8.79 |
% |
|
|
8.74 |
% |
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
|
8.47 |
% |
Total Capital |
|
|
11.65 |
|
|
|
12.02 |
|
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
12.04 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
|
Leverage (7) |
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
Common stockholders equity to assets |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
7.46 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
7.67 |
% |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
Total stockholders equity to assets |
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
7.53 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
|
7.90 |
|
Dividends declared (8) |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends |
|
|
1.51 |
x |
|
|
1.79 |
x |
|
|
2.00 |
x |
|
|
2.41 |
x |
|
|
1.89 |
x |
(1) |
Discontinued operations for 2002 to 2006 include the operations (and associated gain on disposition) described in the Companys June 24, 2005 announced agreement for the sale of
substantially all of its Asset Management business to Legg Mason. The majority of the transaction closed on December 1, 2005. Discontinued operations from 2002 to 2006 also includes the operations (and associated gain) described in the
Companys January 31, 2005 announced agreement for the sale of Citigroups Travelers Life & Annuity, substantially all of Citigroups international insurance business and Citigroups Argentine pension business to
MetLife Inc. The transaction closed on July 1, 2005. On August 20, 2002, Citigroup completed the distribution to its stockholders of a majority portion of its remaining ownership interest in Travelers Property Casualty Corp. (TPC).
Following the distribution, Citigroup began accounting for TPC as discontinued operations. As such, 2002 also reflects TPC as a discontinued operation. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118. |
(2) |
Accounting change of ($49) million in 2005 represents the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of SFAS No. 143. Accounting change of ($47) million in 2002 resulted from the adoption of the remaining provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). |
(3) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
(4) |
During 2004, the Company deconsolidated the subsidiary issuer trusts in accordance with FIN 46-R. For regulatory capital purposes, these trust securities remain a component of Tier 1 Capital.
See Capital Resources and Liquidity on page 86. |
(5) |
The return on average common stockholders equity and return on average total stockholders equity are calculated using net income after deducting preferred stock dividends.
|
(6) |
Risk capital is a measure of risk levels and the trade-off of risk and return. It is defined as the amount of capital required to absorb potential unexpected economic losses resulting from
extremely severe events over a one-year time period. Return on risk capital is calculated as annualized income from continuing operations divided by average risk capital. Invested capital is defined as risk capital plus goodwill and intangible
assets excluding mortgage servicing rights (which are a component of risk capital). Return on invested capital is calculated using income adjusted to exclude a net internal charge Citigroup levies on the goodwill and intangible assets of each
business offset by each business share of the rebate of the goodwill and intangible asset charge. Return on risk capital and return on invested capital are non-GAAP performance measures; because they are measures of risk with no basis in GAAP,
there is no comparable GAAP measure to which they can be reconciled. Management uses return on risk capital to assess businesses operational performance and to allocate Citigroups balance sheet and risk capital capacity. Return on
invested capital is used to assess returns on potential acquisitions and to compare long-term performance of businesses with differing proportions of organic and acquired growth. See page 59 for a further discussion of risk capital.
|
(7) |
Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted average assets. |
(8) |
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net income per diluted share. |
3
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2006 IN SUMMARY
In 2006, Citigroup earned $21.2 billion from continuing operations on revenues of $89.6 billion. Income was up
7% from 2005, while diluted EPS from continuing operations increased 11%, with the increment in the growth rate reflecting the benefit from our share repurchase program. Net income, which includes discontinued operations, was $21.5 billion, down 12%
from the prior year, reflecting the absence of significant gains on sales of businesses recorded in 2005. Income was diversified by segment, product and region.
During 2006, we continued to execute on our key strategic initiatives, including the opening of a record 1,165 new Citibank and Consumer Finance branches (862 in the International sector and 303 in the U.S.), the
continued integration of our businesses, investment in technology, and hiring and training our professionals.
Customer volume growth was
strong, with average loans up 14%, average deposits up 16% and average interest-earning assets up 16% from year-ago levels. Principal transactions revenues grew 37% and client assets under fee-based management grew 15%. And we completed or announced
several strategic acquisitions and partnerships (including Akbank, Guangdong Bank, Egg, Quilter, Grupo Financiero Uno and Grupo Cuscatlan) that will strengthen our franchises.
Revenues increased 7% from 2005, reaching $89.6 billion. Our international operations recorded revenue growth of
14% in 2006, including an 8% increase in International Consumer, 22% in International CIB and 31% in International GWM.
Revenue growth
benefited from increased loan volumes, including corporate loan growth of 29% and consumer loan growth of 13%. Transaction Services assets under custody increased 21% and Global Wealth Management client assets increased 10%.
Net interest revenue grew 1%, as strong growth in interest-earning assets was offset by flat or inverted yield curves in the major economies. Net interest
margin in 2006 was 2.65%, down 41 basis points from 2005 (see the discussion of net interest margin on page 81). This spread compression negatively affected the Companys operating leverage ratios. Non-interest revenue increased 13% from 2005,
reflecting fees from higher customer business volumes, as well as increased principal transactions revenues. CIB revenues grew by 14%, reflecting strong performance in Capital Markets and Banking and Transaction Services. Capital
Markets and Banking finished the year ranked #1 in equity underwriting and #2 in completed mergers and acquisitions activity.
4
Operating expenses increased 15% from the previous year. Expense growth included three points from the adoption
of SFAS 123(R) and reflected the absence of a $600 million release from the WorldCom and Litigation Reserve Charge recorded in 2005. Excluding these items, operating expenses increased 10% in 2006, reflecting increased investment spending, the
impact of foreign exchange, and an increase in other legal expenses. Investment spending included the addition of Consumer branches and investments in technology.
During the 2006 fourth quarter, Bob Druskin was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Company. One of
Bobs primary responsibilities is to complete a structural review of our expense base by the end of the first quarter. His review will include an analysis of the structure of the organization, the multiple back offices, the multiple middle
offices and separate corporate centers around the Company, with a goal of creating a more efficient and nimbler organization.
During 2006, we continued our focus on disciplined capital allocation and driving returns to our shareholders.
Our equity capital base and trust preferred securities grew to $129.4 billion at December 31, 2006. Stockholders equity increased by $7.2 billion during 2006 to $119.8 billion, even with the distribution of $9.8 billion in dividends to
common shareholders and the repurchase of $7.0 billion of common stock during the year. Citigroup maintained its well-capitalized position with a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 8.59% at December 31, 2006. Return on common equity was 18.8%
for 2006. Our total return to shareholders was 19.6% during the year (which represents Citigroups stock appreciation assuming the reinvestment of dividends).
The Board of Directors increased the quarterly common dividend by 11% during 2006 and by an additional 10% in
January 2007, bringing the current quarterly payout to $0.54 per share. During the year, Moodys upgraded Citibank, N.A.s credit rating to Aaa from Aa1. On February 14, 2007, Standard & Poors
raised Citigroups senior debt credit rating to AA from AA-. The long-term debt rating on Citibank, N.A. was raised to AA+ from AA.
5
The U.S. and international credit environments remained stable; this, as well as significantly lower consumer bankruptcy filings, the absence of the $490
million pretax charge in 2005 related to a change in write-off policy in EMEA consumer, and a shift in consumer loans to products with lower net credit losses, drove a $1.191 billion decrease in credit costs compared to year-ago levels. The
Global Consumer loss rate was 1.52%, a 49 basis-point decline from 2005. Corporate cash-basis loans declined 47% from year-ago levels to $535 million.
The effective income tax rate on continuing operations declined to 27.3%, primarily reflecting the $598 million benefit for the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit and a net $237 million tax reserve release related to
the resolution of the New York Tax Audits. The effective tax rate for 2006 would have been 30.1% without the tax reserve releases.
Outlook for 2007
We enter 2007 with good business momentum, as we expect to see our investment initiatives generate increasing revenues, and are well-positioned to gain
from our balanced approach to growth and competitive advantages.
We expect to continue to achieve growth in loans, deposits and other
customer activity resulting from our increased distribution points, expanded product offerings, and the impact from recent targeted acquisitions.
In 2006, our international businesses contributed 43% of our income from continuing operations. We expect to continue to re-weight our revenue mix towards International Consumer, CIB and Global Wealth Management.
Disciplined capital allocation will remain fundamental to our strategic process and we will have a sharp focus on expense management.
Although there may be volatility in our results in any given year, over the long term our revenues are targeted to grow organically at a mid- to
high-single-digit rate, with strong expense and credit management driving earnings and earnings per share growth at a faster level. We will seek to augment this growth rate over time through targeted acquisitions.
Credit is broadly stable as 2007 begins; however, we are budgeting for a moderate deterioration of credit in 2007. In addition, the tax benefits we
realized in 2006 will not be repeated in 2007, and we anticipate the effective tax rate to return to a more normalized rate of 30% to 31%, not the 27.3% recorded in 2006.
In our Japan Consumer Finance business, we look to break even in 2007.
With our investment spending
initiatives, a record number of branches were added in 2006. We are going to moderate our rate of increased investment spending in 2007.
Citigroups financial results are closely tied to the external global economic environment. Movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates present both opportunities and risks for the Company. Weakness in the global economy,
credit deterioration, inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty are examples of risks that could adversely impact our earnings.
A detailed
review and outlook for each of our business segments and products are included in the discussions that follow, and the risks are more fully discussed on pages 76 to 96.
Certain of the statements above are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
6
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
The following graph compares the cumulative total return on Citigroups common stock with the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Financial Index
over the five-year period extending through December 31, 2006. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2001 in Citigroups common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Financial Index and that all dividends
were reinvested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31 |
|
CITIGROUP |
|
S&P 500 INDEX |
|
S&P FINANCIAL INDEX |
2002 |
|
$ |
76.08 |
|
$ |
77.90 |
|
$ |
85.37 |
2003 |
|
|
107.72 |
|
|
100.24 |
|
|
111.86 |
2004 |
|
|
110.65 |
|
|
111.15 |
|
|
124.06 |
2005 |
|
|
115.77 |
|
|
116.60 |
|
|
132.03 |
2006 |
|
|
138.41 |
|
|
135.02 |
|
|
157.36 |
7
EVENTS IN
2006
Certain of the statements below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
U.K. Market Expansion
Egg
On January 29, 2007, the Company announced the agreement to acquire Egg Banking plc (Egg), the
worlds largest pure online bank and one of the U.K.s leading online financial services providers, from Prudential PLC for approximately $1.127 billion, subject to adjustments at closing. Egg has more than three million customers and
offers various financial products and services including online payment and account aggregation services, credit cards, personal loans, savings accounts, mortgages, insurance and investments. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is
expected to close before the end of the 2007 second quarter.
Quilter
On December 13, 2006, the Company announced the agreement to acquire Quilter, a U.K. wealth advisory firm with over $10.9 billion of assets under management, from Morgan Stanley. Quilter has more than 18,000
clients and 300 staff located in 10 offices throughout the U.K., Ireland and the Channel Islands. This transaction, which is subject to U.S. and local country regulatory approvals, is expected to close in the 2007 first quarter. Once closed, its
business results will be included in Global Wealth Management.
Purchase of 20% Equity Interest in Akbank
On October 17, 2006, the Company announced its planned purchase of a 20% equity interest in Akbank for approximately $3.1 billion. The transaction closed on
January 9, 2007. Akbank, the second-largest privately owned bank by assets in Turkey, is a premier, full-service retail, commercial, corporate and private bank.
Sabanci Holding, a 34% owner of Akbank shares, and its subsidiaries have granted Citigroup a right of first refusal or first offer over the sale of any of their Akbank shares in the future. Subject to certain
exceptions, including purchases from Sabanci Holding and its subsidiaries, Citigroup has agreed not to increase its percentage ownership in Akbank.
Strategic
Investment and Cooperation Agreement with Guangdong Development Bank
On December 17, 2006, a Citigroup-led consortium acquired an 85.6% stake in
Guangdong Development Bank (GDB). Citigroups share is 20% of GDB and its investment of approximately $725 million will be accounted for under the equity method.
In accordance with the parties agreement, Citigroup will have significant management influence at GDB to enhance GDBs management team and
corporate governance standards, instill operational and lending best practices, improve risk management and internal controls, upgrade GDBs information technology infrastructure, and further develop GDBs customer service and product
offerings.
Central American Acquisitions
Grupo
Cuscatlan
On December 13, 2006, Citigroup announced the agreement to acquire the subsidiaries of Grupo Cuscatlan for $1.51 billion in cash and
stock from Corporacion UBC Internacional S.A. Grupo Cuscatlan is one of the leading financial groups in Central America, with total assets of $5.4 billion, total
loans of $3.5 billion, and total deposits of $3.4 billion. Grupo Cuscatlan has operations in El Salvador, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras and Panama. This
acquisition is subject to U.S. and local country regulatory approvals and is expected to close later in the 2007 first quarter.
Grupo Financiero
Uno
On October 27, 2006, Citigroup announced that it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire Grupo Financiero Uno (GFU), the largest credit
card issuer in Central America, and its affiliates. The acquisition of GFU, with $2.1 billion in assets, will expand the presence of Citigroups Latin America consumer franchise, enhancing its credit card business in the region and
establishing a platform for regional growth in Consumer Finance and Retail Banking.
GFU is privately held and has more than one million
retail clients, representing 1.1 million credit card accounts, $1.2 billion in credit card receivables and $1.3 billion in deposits in Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. GFU operates a distribution network of 75
branches and more than 100 mini-branches and points of sale.
This acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approvals in the United
States and each of the six countries, is anticipated to close later in the 2007 first quarter.
Sale of Avantel
In November 2006, Citigroup sold its investment in Avantel, a leading long-distance telecom service provider in Mexico, to AXTEL. The transaction resulted in an after-tax
gain of $145 million ($234 million pretax) in the 2006 fourth quarter. The investment in Avantel was initially acquired by Citigroup as part of its acquisition of Banamex in 2001 and was subsequently increased with the purchase of an additional
stake in 2005.
Repositioning of the Japan Consumer Finance Business
On January 8, 2007, Citigroup announced that it would reposition its consumer finance business in Japan. This decision is the result of changes in the operating environment in the consumer finance business in Japan, and
the passage on December 13, 2006, of changes to Japans consumer lending laws. The change in law will lower the interest rates permissible on new consumer finance loans by 2010.
In the 2006 fourth quarter, the Company recorded a $375 million after-tax ($581 million pretax) charge to increase reserves for estimated losses resulting
from customer refund settlements in the business. This charge was recorded as a reduction to interest revenue on loans. The Company also recorded a $40 million after-tax ($60 million pretax) repositioning charge for costs associated with closing
approximately 270 branches and 100 automated loan machines. This repositioning is consistent with the companys efforts to establish a lower-cost platform for the business and will enable it to compete more effectively in the new interest rate
environment in Japan.
Finalizing the 2005 Sale of Asset Management Business
On December 1, 2005, the Company sold substantially all of its Asset Management Business to Legg Mason Inc. (Legg Mason) in exchange for Legg Masons broker-dealer and capital markets businesses, $2.298
billion of Legg Masons common and preferred shares (valued as of the closing date), and $500 million in cash. This cash was obtained via a lending facility provided by Citigroup CIB business. The transaction did not include
8
Citigroups asset management business in Mexico, its retirement services business in Latin America (both of which are included in
International Retail Banking) or its interest in the CitiStreet joint venture (which is included in Smith Barney). The total value of the transaction at the time of closing was approximately $4.369 billion, resulting in an after-tax
gain for Citigroup of approximately $2.082 billion ($3.404 billion pretax), which was reported in discontinued operations.
Concurrent with
this sale, the Company sold Legg Masons capital markets business to Stifel Financial Corp. (The transactions described in the above two paragraphs are referred to as the Sale of the Asset Management Business.)
With the receipt of Legg Masons broker-dealer business, the Company added 1,226 financial advisors in 124 branch offices to its Global Wealth
Management business.
During March 2006, the Company sold 10.3 million shares of Legg Mason stock through an underwritten public
offering. The net sale proceeds of $1.258 billion resulted in a pretax gain of $24 million in Alternative Investments.
In September 2006,
the Company received from Legg Mason the final closing adjustment payment related to this sale. This payment resulted in an additional after-tax gain of $51 million ($83 million pretax), recorded in discontinued operations.
Additional information can be found in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118.
Resolution of Tax Audits
New York State and New York City
In September 2006, Citigroup reached a settlement agreement with the New York State and New York City taxing authorities regarding various tax
liabilities for the years 1998 2005 (referred to above and hereinafter as the resolution of the New York Tax Audits).
For the 2006 third quarter, the Company released $254 million from its tax contingency reserves, which resulted in increases of $237 million in after-tax income from continuing operations and $17 million in after-tax Income from
discontinued operations.
Federal
In March 2006,
the Company received a notice from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that they had concluded the tax audit for the years 1999 through 2002 (referred to hereinafter as the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit). For the 2006 first quarter,
the Company released a total of $657 million from its tax contingency reserves related to the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit.
The
following table summarizes the 2006 tax benefits, by business, from the resolution of the New York Tax Audits and Federal Tax Audit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
New York City and New York State Audits |
|
Federal Audit |
|
Total |
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
79 |
|
$ |
290 |
|
$ |
369 |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
116 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
292 |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
34 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
47 |
Alternative Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
58 |
Corporate/Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
69 |
Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
237 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
$ |
835 |
Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
76 |
Total |
|
$ |
254 |
|
$ |
657 |
|
$ |
911 |
Finalizing the 2005 Sale of Travelers Life & Annuity
On July 1,
2005, the Company sold Citigroups Travelers Life & Annuity and substantially all of Citigroups international insurance businesses to MetLife. The businesses sold were the primary vehicles through which Citigroup engaged in the
Life Insurance and Annuities business. This transaction encompassed Travelers Life & Annuitys U.S. businesses and its international operations, other than Citigroups life insurance business in Mexico (which is now
included within International Retail Banking). (This transaction is referred to hereinafter as the Sale of the Life Insurance and Annuities Business).
At closing, Citigroup received $1.0 billion in MetLife equity securities and $10.830 billion in cash, which resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $2.120 billion ($3.386 billion pretax), which was included in
discontinued operations.
In July 2006, Citigroup recognized an $85 million after-tax gain from the sale of MetLife shares. This gain was
reported within Income from continuing operations in the Alternative Investments business.
In July 2006, the Company received the final
closing adjustment payment related to this sale, resulting in an after-tax gain of $75 million ($115 million pretax), which was recorded in discontinued operations.
Additional information can be found in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118.
Sale of Upstate New York
Branches
On June 30, 2006, Citigroup sold the Upstate New York Financial Center Network, consisting of 21 branches in Rochester, N.Y., and
Buffalo, N.Y. to M&T Bank (referred to hereinafter as the Sale of New York Branches). Citigroup received a premium on deposit balances of approximately $1 billion. An after-tax gain of $92 million ($163 million pretax) was recognized
in the 2006 second quarter.
Acquisition of Federated Credit Card Portfolio and Credit Card Agreement With Federated Department Stores
In June 2005, Citigroup announced a long-term agreement with Federated Department Stores, Inc. (Federated) under which the companies partner to acquire and manage
approximately $6.2 billion of Federateds credit card receivables, including existing and new accounts, executed in three phases.
For
the first phase, which closed in October 2005, Citigroup acquired Federateds receivables under management, totaling approximately $3.3 billion. For the second phase, which closed in May 2006, additional Federated receivables totaling
approximately $1.9 billion were transferred to Citigroup from the previous provider. For the final phase, in July 2006, Citigroup acquired the approximately $1.0 billion credit card receivable portfolio of The May Department Stores Company (May),
which merged with Federated.
Citigroup paid a premium of approximately 11.5% to acquire these portfolios. The multi-year agreement also
provides Federated the ability to participate in the portfolio performance, based on credit sales and certain other performance metrics.
The Federated and May credit card portfolios comprise a total of approximately 17 million active accounts.
MasterCard Initial Public Offering
In June 2006, MasterCard conducted a series of transactions consisting of: (i) an IPO of new Class A stock, (ii) an
exchange of its old Class A stock held by its member banks for shares of its new Class B and Class M stocks, and
9
(iii) a partial redemption of the new Class B stock held by the member banks. Citigroup, as one of MasterCards member banks, received
4,946,587 shares of Class B stock, 48 shares of Class M stock, and $123 million in cash as a result of these transactions. An after-tax gain of $78 million ($123 million pretax) was recognized in the 2006 second quarter related to the cash
redemption of shares.
Consolidation of Brazils CrediCard
In April 2006, Citigroup and Banco Itau dissolved their joint venture in CrediCard, a Brazilian consumer credit card business. In accordance with the dissolution agreement, Banco Itau received half of CrediCards assets and customer
accounts in exchange for its 50% ownership, leaving Citigroup as the sole owner of CrediCard.
Adoption of the Accounting for Share-Based Payments
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)), which replaced the existing SFAS 123 and superseded Accounting Principles Board (APB) 25. SFAS 123(R) requires companies to measure and record compensation expense for stock options and other share-based payments based on the
instruments fair value, reduced by expected forfeitures.
In adopting this standard, the Company conformed to recent accounting
guidance that restricted or deferred stock awards issued to retirement-eligible employees who meet certain age and service requirements must be either expensed on the grant date or accrued over a service period prior to the grant date. This charge
consisted of $398 million after-tax ($648 million pretax) for the immediate expensing of awards granted to retirement-eligible employees in January 2006.
The following table summarizes the SFAS 123(R) impact, by segment, on the 2006 first quarter pretax compensation expense for stock awards granted to retirement-eligible employees in January 2006:
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 First Quarter |
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
121 |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
354 |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
145 |
Alternative Investments |
|
|
7 |
Corporate/Other |
|
|
21 |
Total |
|
$ |
648 |
The following table summarizes the quarterly SFAS 123(R) impact on 2006 pretax compensation expense
(and after-tax impact) for the quarterly accrual of the estimated stock awards that were granted in January 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Pretax |
|
After-tax |
First quarter 2006 |
|
$ |
198 |
|
$ |
122 |
Second quarter 2006 |
|
|
168 |
|
|
104 |
Third quarter 2006 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
127 |
Fourth quarter 2006 |
|
|
263 |
|
|
173 |
Total 2006 |
|
$ |
824 |
|
$ |
526 |
The Company changed the plans retirement eligibility for the January 2007 management awards,
which affected the amount of the accrual in the 2006 second, third and fourth quarters.
Additional information can be found in Notes 1 and
8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 129 and 142, respectively.
Credit Reserves
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a net release/utilization of its credit reserves of $356 million, consisting of a net
release/utilization of $626 million in Global Consumer and a net build of $270 million in CIB. The net release/utilization in Global Consumer was primarily due to lower bankruptcy filings, a stable credit environment in the U.S. Consumer portfolio
and International portfolio and a release of approximately $200 million related to Hurricane Katrina. Partially offsetting the net releases were builds in Mexico, primarily driven by target market expansion in Cards, Taiwan, due to the impact
of industry-wide credit condition in Cards, and Japan, related to the changes in the consumer lending environment (see discussion on page 28).
The net build of $270 million in CIB was primarily comprised of $261 million in Capital Markets and Banking, which included a $232 million reserve increase for unfunded lending commitments during the year. The
net build reflected growth in loans and unfunded commitments and a change in credit rating of certain counterparties in certain industries.
10
EVE
NTS IN 2005
Change in EMEA Consumer Write-off Policy
Prior to the third quarter of 2005, certain Western European consumer portfolios were granted an exception to Citigroups global write-off policy. The exception extended the write-off period from the standard
120-day policy for personal installment loans, and was granted because of the higher recovery rates experienced in these portfolios. During 2005, Citigroup observed lower actual recovery rates, stemming primarily from a change in bankruptcy and wage
garnishment laws in Germany and, as a result, rescinded the exception to the global standard. The net charge was $332 million ($490 million pretax) resulting from the recording of $1.153 billion of write-offs and a corresponding utilization of $663
million of reserves in the 2005 third quarter.
These write-offs did not relate to a change in the portfolio credit quality but rather to a
change in environmental factors due to law changes and consumer behavior that led Citigroup to re-evaluate its estimates of future long-term recoveries and their appropriateness to the write-off exception.
Hurricane Katrina
In the 2005 third quarter, the Company recorded a $222
million after-tax charge ($357 million pretax) for the estimated probable losses incurred from Hurricane Katrina. This charge consisted primarily of additional credit costs in U.S. Cards, U.S. Commercial Business, U.S. Consumer Lending
and U.S. Retail Distribution businesses, based on total credit exposures of approximately $3.6 billion in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Individual Assistance designated areas. This charge did not include an after-tax
estimate of $75 million ($109 million pretax) for fees and interest due from related customers that were waived during 2005. Since the 2005 third quarter, approximately $241 million of these reserves were utilized or released.
United States Bankruptcy Legislation
On October 17, 2005, the Bankruptcy
Reform Act (or the Act) became effective. The Act imposed a means test to determine if people who file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy earn more than the median income in their state and could repay at least $6,000 of unsecured debt over five years.
Bankruptcy filers who meet this test are required to enter into a repayment plan under Chapter 13, instead of canceling their debt entirely under Chapter 7. As a result of these more stringent guidelines, bankruptcy claims accelerated prior to the
effective date. The incremental bankruptcy losses over the Companys estimated baseline in 2005 that was attributable to the Act in U.S. Cards business was approximately $970 million on a managed basis ($550 million in the Companys
on-balance portfolio and $420 million in the securitized portfolio). In addition, the U.S. Retail Distribution business incurred incremental bankruptcy losses of approximately $90 million during 2005.
Bank and Credit Card Customer Rewards Costs
During the 2005 fourth quarter, the
Company conformed its global policy approach for the accounting of rewards costs for bank and credit card customers. Conforming the global policy resulted in the write-off of $354 million after-tax ($565 million pretax) of unamortized deferred
rewards costs. Previously, accounting practices for these costs varied across the Company. The revised policy requires all businesses to recognize rewards costs as incurred.
Sale of Nikko Cordial Stake
On December 20, 2005, Citigroup reduced its stake in Nikko Cordial from approximately 11.2% to 4.9%. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of
$248 million ($386 million pretax). In connection with this sale, Nikko Cordial and Citigroup each contributed an additional approximately $175 million to their joint venture, Nikko Citigroup Limited.
Sale of the Merchant Acquiring Businesses
In December 2005, Citigroup sold its
European merchant acquiring business to EuroConex for $127 million. This transaction resulted in a $62 million after-tax gain ($98 million pretax).
In September 2005, Citigroup sold its U.S. merchant acquiring business, Citigroup Payment Service Inc., to First Data Corporation for $70 million, resulting in a $41 million after-tax gain ($61 million pretax).
Homeland Investment Act Benefit
The Companys 2005 full-year results from
continuing operations include a $198 million tax benefit from the Homeland Investment Act provision of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, net of the impact of remitting income earned in 2005 and prior years that would otherwise have been
indefinitely invested overseas. The amount of dividends that were repatriated relating to this benefit is approximately $3.2 billion.
Copelco Litigation
Settlement
In 2000, Citigroup purchased Copelco Capital, Inc., a leasing business, from Itochu International Inc. and III Holding Inc. (formerly known
as Copelco Financial Services Group, Inc., collectively referred to herein as Itochu) for $666 million. During 2001, Citigroup filed a lawsuit asserting breach of representations and warranties, among other causes of action, under the
Stock Purchase Agreement entered into between Citigroup and Itochu in March of 2000. During the 2005 third quarter, Citigroup and Itochu signed a settlement agreement that mutually released all claims, and under which Itochu paid Citigroup $185
million which was recorded in pretax income.
Mexico Value Added Tax (VAT) Refund
During the 2005 third quarter, Citigroup Mexico received a $182 million refund of VAT taxes from the Mexican Government related to the 2003 and 2004 tax years as a result of a Mexico Supreme Court ruling. The refund
was recorded as a reduction of $140 million (pretax) in other operating expense and $42 million (pretax) in other revenue.
Settlement of Enron Class Action
Litigation
As described in the Legal Proceedings discussion on page 169, during the 2005 second quarter, Citigroup settled class action
litigation brought on behalf of purchasers of Enron securities.
Settlement of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Transfer Agent Investigation
On May 31, 2005, the Company completed the settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), disclosed by Citigroup in January 2005,
resolving an investigation by the SEC into matters relating to arrangements between certain Smith Barney mutual funds (the Funds), an affiliated transfer agent, and an unaffiliated sub-transfer agent.
Under the terms of the settlement, Citigroup paid a total of $208 million, consisting of $128 million in disgorgement and $80 million in penalties. These
funds, less $24 million already credited to the Funds, have been paid to the U.S. Treasury and will be distributed pursuant to a distribution plan prepared by Citigroup and to be approved by the SEC. The terms of the settlement had been fully
reserved by Citigroup in prior periods.
11
Merger of Bank Holding Companies
On August 1, 2005, Citigroup merged its
two intermediate bank holding companies, Citigroup Holdings Company and Citicorp, into Citigroup Inc. Coinciding with this merger, Citigroup assumed all existing indebtedness and outstanding guarantees of Citicorp.
During the 2005 second quarter, Citigroup also consolidated its capital markets funding activities into two legal entities: (i) Citigroup Inc., which
issues long-term debt, trust preferred securities, and preferred and common stock, and (ii) Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI), a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and
credit-linked notes, all of which is guaranteed by Citigroup.
As part of the funding consolidation, Citigroup also guaranteed and continues
to guarantee various debt obligations of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHIs publicly-issued securities. CGMHI no longer files periodic reports with the SEC and
continues to be rated on the basis of a guarantee of its financial obligations from Citigroup.
Repositioning Charges
The Company recorded a $272 million after-tax ($435 million pretax) charge during the 2005 first quarter for repositioning costs. The repositioning charges were
predominantly severance-related costs recorded in CIB ($151 million after-tax) and in Global Consumer ($95 million after-tax). These repositioning actions were consistent with the Companys objectives of controlling expenses while continuing to
invest in growth opportunities.
Resolution of Glendale Litigation
During the 2005 first quarter, the Company recorded a $72 million after-tax gain ($114 million pretax) following the resolution of Glendale Federal Bank v. United States, an action brought by Glendale Federal Bank.
Acquisition of First American Bank
On March 31, 2005, Citigroup completed
the acquisition of First American Bank in Texas (FAB). The transaction established Citigroups retail branch presence in Texas, giving Citigroup 106 branches, $4.2 billion in assets and approximately 120,000 new customers in the state at the
time of the transactions closing. The results of FAB are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from March 2005 forward.
Divestiture of the
Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio
On May 1, 2005, Citigroup completed the sale of its manufactured housing loan portfolio, consisting of $1.4
billion in loans, to 21st Mortgage Corp. The Company recognized a $109 million after-tax loss ($157 million pretax) in the 2005 first quarter related to the divestiture.
Divestiture of CitiCapitals Transportation Finance Business
On January 31, 2005, the Company completed the sale of
CitiCapitals Transportation Finance Business based in Dallas and Toronto to GE Commercial Finance for total cash consideration of approximately $4.6 billion. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of $111 million ($161 million pretax).
Shutdown of the Private Bank in Japan and Related Charge and Other Activities in Japan
On September 29, 2005, the Company officially closed its Private Bank business in Japan.
In September 2004, the
Financial Services Agency of Japan (FSA) issued an administrative order against Citibank Japan. This order included a requirement that Citigroup exit all private banking operations in Japan by September 30, 2005. In connection with this
required exit, the Company established a $400 million ($244 million after-tax) reserve (the Exit Plan Charge) during the 2004 fourth quarter.
The Companys Private Bank operations in Japan had total revenues, net of interest expense, of $200 million and net income of $39 million (excluding the Exit Plan Charge) during the year ended December 31, 2004, and
$264 million and $83 million, respectively, for 2003.
On October 25, 2004, Citigroup announced its decision to wind down Cititrust and
Banking Corporation (Cititrust), a licensed trust bank in Japan, after concluding that there were internal control, compliance and governance issues in that subsidiary. On April 22, 2005, the FSA issued an administrative order requiring
Cititrust to suspend from engaging in all new trust business in 2005. Cititrust closed all customer accounts in 2005.
12
EVENTS IN 2
004
Settlement of WorldCom Class Action Litigation and Charge for Regulatory and Legal Matters
During the 2004 second quarter, Citigroup recorded a charge of $4.95 billion after-tax ($7.915 billion pretax) related to a settlement of class action litigation brought
on behalf of purchasers of WorldCom securities and an increase in litigation reserves.
Sale of Samba Financial Group
On June 15, 2004, the Company sold, for cash, its 20% equity investment in The Samba Financial Group (Samba, formerly known as the Saudi American Bank), to the
Public Investment Fund, a Saudi public sector entity. Citigroup recognized an after-tax gain of $756 million ($1.168 billion pretax) on the sale during the 2004 second quarter. The gain was shared equally between Global Consumer and CIB.
Acquisition of KorAm Bank
On April 30, 2004, Citigroup completed its
tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of KorAm Bank (KorAm) at a price of KRW 15,500 per share in cash. In total, Citigroup has acquired 99.9% of KorAms outstanding shares for a total of KRW 3.14 trillion ($2.7 billion).
The results of KorAm are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from May 2004 forward.
Divestiture of Electronic Financial Services Inc.
During January 2004, the Company completed the sale for cash of Electronic Financial Services Inc. (EFS) for $390 million. EFS is a provider of government-issued benefit
payments and prepaid stored-value cards used by state and federal government agencies, as well as stored-value services for private institutions. The sale of EFS resulted in an after-tax gain of $180 million ($255 million pretax) in the 2004 first
quarter.
Acquisition of Washington Mutual Finance Corporation
On
January 9, 2004, Citigroup completed the acquisition of Washington Mutual Finance Corporation (WMF) for $1.25 billion in cash. WMF was the consumer finance subsidiary of Washington Mutual, Inc. WMF provides direct consumer installment loans and
real-estate-secured loans, as well as sales finance and the sale of insurance. The acquisition included 427 WMF offices located in 26 states, primarily in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States, and total assets of $3.8 billion. Citigroup
has guaranteed all outstanding unsecured indebtedness of WMF in connection with this acquisition. The results of WMF are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from January 2004 forward.
13
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements on page 109 contain a summary of the Companys significant accounting policies, including a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements. These policies, as well as estimates made by management, are integral to the
presentation of the Companys financial condition. It is important to note that they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments and estimates, at times, regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has
discussed each of these significant accounting policies, the related estimates and its judgments with the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors. Additional information about these policies can be found in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements on page 109.
Certain statements below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
Valuations of Financial Instruments
The Company holds fixed income and equity securities, derivatives, investments in private equity and other financial instruments. The Company holds its investments and
trading assets and liabilities on the balance sheet to meet customer needs, to manage liquidity needs and interest rate risks, and for proprietary trading and private equity investing.
Substantially all of these assets and liabilities are reflected at fair value on the Companys balance sheet. Fair values are considered verified if
they meet one of the following criteria:
|
|
Externally substantiated via comparison to quoted market prices or third-party broker quotations; |
|
|
By using models that are validated by qualified personnel independent of the area that created the model and inputs that are verified by comparison to third-party
broker quotations or other third-party sources where available; or |
|
|
By using alternative procedures such as comparison to comparable securities and/or subsequent liquidation prices. |
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, approximately 94.9% and 94.5% of the available-for-sale and trading portfolios gross assets and
liabilities (prior to netting positions pursuant to FIN 39 and excluding Global Consumers credit card and mortgage securitization interest-only strips) are considered verified and approximately 5.1% and 5.5% are considered unverified. Of the
unverified assets, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, approximately 50.3% and 60.6% consist of cash products, where independent quotes were not available and/or alternative procedures were not feasible, and 49.7% and 39.4% consist of
derivative products where either the model was not validated and/or the inputs could not be substantiated due to the lack of appropriate market quotations. Such values are actively reviewed by management.
Changes in the valuation of the trading assets and liabilities flow through the income statement. Changes in the valuation of available-for-sale assets
generally flow through other comprehensive income, which is a component of equity on the balance sheet. A full description of the Companys related policies and procedures can be found in Notes 1, 14 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements on pages 129, 153, and 154, respectively.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for credit losses.
In addition, management has established and maintained reserves for the potential losses related to the Companys off-balance sheet exposures of unfunded lending commitments, including standby letters of credit and guarantees. These reserves
are established in accordance with Citigroups Loan Loss Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. Under these policies, the Companys Senior Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer
review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from Risk and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.
During these reviews, these above-mentioned representatives covering the business area having classifiably-managed portfolios (that is, portfolios where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned, which are primarily Corporate and Investment
Banking, Global Consumers commercial lending businesses, and Global Wealth Management) present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The
quantitative data include:
|
|
Estimated probable losses for non-performing, non-homogeneous exposures within a business lines classifiably-managed portfolio. Consideration is given
to all available evidence when determining this estimate including, as appropriate: (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans contractual effective rate; (ii) the borrowers overall financial
condition, resources and payment record; and (iii) the prospects for support from financially responsible guarantors or the realizable value of any collateral. |
|
|
Statistically calculated losses inherent in the classifiably-managed portfolio for performing and de minimis non-performing exposures. The calculation is
based upon: (i) Citigroups internal system of credit-risk ratings, which are analogous to the risk ratings of the major rating agencies; (ii) the Corporate portfolio database; and (iii) historical default and loss data,
including rating agency information regarding default rates from 1983 to 2005, and internal data, dating to the early 1970s, on severity of losses in the event of default. |
|
|
Additional adjustments include: (i) statistically calculated estimates to cover the historical fluctuation of the default rates over the credit cycle,
the historical variability of loss severity among defaulted loans, and the degree to which there are large obligor concentrations in the global portfolio; and (ii) adjustments made for specifically known items, such as current environmental
factors and credit trends. |
In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance Staffs that cover
business areas which have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans (primarily Global Consumers non-commercial lending areas) present their recommended reserve balances based upon historical delinquency flow rates,
charge-off statistics and loss severity. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist. Adjustments are also made for specifically known items, such as
changing regulations, current environmental factors and credit trends.
14
This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and
diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in
these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the income statement on the lines provision for loan losses and
provision for unfunded lending commitments. For a further description of the loan loss reserve and related accounts, see Notes 1 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 129 and 157, respectively.
Securitizations
The Company securitizes a number of different asset classes as
a means of strengthening its balance sheet and to access competitive financing rates in the market. Under these securitization programs, assets are sold into a trust and used as collateral by the trust to access financing. The cash flows from assets
in the trust service the corresponding trust securities. If the structure of the trust meets stringent accounting guidelines, trust assets are treated as sold and no longer reflected as assets of the Company. If these guidelines are not met, the
assets continue to be recorded as the Companys assets, with the financing activity recorded as liabilities on Citigroups balance sheet. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is currently working on amendments to the accounting
standards governing asset transfers and securitization accounting. Upon completion of these standards the Company will need to re-evaluate its accounting and disclosures. Due to the FASBs ongoing deliberations, the Company is unable to
accurately determine the effect of future amendments at this time.
The Company assists its clients in securitizing their financial assets
and also packages and securitizes financial assets purchased in the financial markets. The Company may also provide administrative, asset management, underwriting, liquidity facilities and/or other services to the resulting securitization entities,
and may continue to service these financial assets.
A complete description of the Companys accounting for securitized assets can be
found in Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements on page 92 and in Notes 1 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 109 and 143, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to the Income tax laws of the U.S, its states and municipalities and those of the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates. These tax
laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant government taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, the Company must make judgments and interpretations about the application
of these inherently complex tax laws. The Company must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions, both domestic and foreign.
Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be subject to review/adjudication by the court systems of the various tax jurisdictions or may be
settled with the taxing authority upon examination or audit.
The Company reviews these balances quarterly and as new information becomes
available, the balances are adjusted, as appropriate.
The Company is in the process of implementing FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which sets out a consistent framework to determine the appropriate level of tax reserves to maintain for uncertain tax positions, and which will be effective as of January 1,
2007. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 109.
See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 130 for
a further description of the Companys provision and related income tax assets and liabilities.
Legal Reserves
The Company is subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and claims arising from conduct in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings include actions
brought against the Company in its various roles, including acting as a lender, underwriter, broker-dealer or investment advisor. Reserves are established for legal and regulatory claims based upon the probability and estimability of losses and to
fairly present, in conjunction with the disclosures of these matters in the Companys financial statements and SEC filings, managements view of the Companys exposure. The Company reviews outstanding claims with internal as well as
external counsel to assess probability and estimates of loss. The risk of loss is reassessed as new information becomes available and reserves are adjusted, as appropriate. The actual cost of resolving a claim may be substantially higher, or lower,
than the amount of the recorded reserve. See Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 155 and the discussion of Legal Proceedings beginning on page 169.
Accounting Changes and Future Application of Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page
109 for a discussion of Accounting Changes and the Future Application of Accounting Standards.
15
SEGMENT, PRODUCT AND REGIONAL NET INCOME
The
following tables show the net income (loss) for Citigroups businesses on a segment and product view and on a regional view:
CITIGROUP NET INCOMESEGMENT AND PRODUCT VIEW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Global Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Cards |
|
$ |
3,890 |
|
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
|
$ |
3,562 |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
(23 |
)% |
U.S. Retail Distribution |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
(13 |
) |
U.S. Consumer Lending |
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
16 |
|
U.S. Commercial Business |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
(5 |
) |
Total U.S. Consumer (2) |
|
$ |
8,390 |
|
|
$ |
7,173 |
|
|
$ |
8,010 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
(10 |
)% |
International Cards |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
21 |
% |
International Consumer Finance |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
10 |
|
International Retail Banking |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Total International Consumer |
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
$ |
4,098 |
|
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
6 |
% |
Other |
|
$ |
(351 |
) |
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
NM |
|
Total Global Consumer |
|
$ |
12,056 |
|
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
$ |
11,987 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
(9 |
)% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets and Banking |
|
$ |
5,763 |
|
|
$ |
5,327 |
|
|
$ |
5,395 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
(1 |
)% |
Transaction Services |
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
(4,398 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
$ |
7,127 |
|
|
$ |
6,895 |
|
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
NM |
|
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith Barney |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
(2 |
)% |
Private Bank |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
17 |
|
Total Global Wealth Management |
|
$ |
1,444 |
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
3 |
% |
Alternative Investments |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
87 |
% |
Corporate/Other |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
23 |
% |
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
44 |
% |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 120 for assets by segment and the segment balance sheet on page
80. |
(2) |
U.S. disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico. |
NM Not meaningful.
16
CITIGROUP NET INCOMEREGIONAL VIEW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
U.S. (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
8,039 |
|
|
$ |
6,799 |
|
|
$ |
7,729 |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
(12 |
)% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
2,209 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
(2,190 |
) |
|
(25 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Total U.S. |
|
$ |
11,458 |
|
|
$ |
10,890 |
|
|
$ |
6,718 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
62 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
(32 |
) |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
(15 |
) |
Total Mexico |
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
14 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
(20 |
)% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
(60 |
) |
Total Latin America |
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
(24 |
)% |
EMEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
(68 |
)% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Total EMEA |
|
$ |
2,759 |
|
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
(35 |
)% |
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
(83 |
)% |
|
15 |
% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
49 |
|
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
100 |
|
|
60 |
|
Total Japan |
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
1,122 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
51 |
% |
Asia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
14 |
% |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Total Asia |
|
$ |
3,180 |
|
|
$ |
2,714 |
|
|
$ |
2,603 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
Alternative Investments |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
87 |
% |
Corporate/Other |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
23 |
% |
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
44 |
% |
Total International |
|
$ |
9,169 |
|
|
$ |
8,146 |
|
|
$ |
8,520 |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
(4 |
)% |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
(2) |
Excludes Alternative Investments and Corporate/Other, which are predominantly related to the U.S. The U.S. regional disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Global Consumer
for the U.S. includes Other Consumer (except for the Samba gain which is allocated to EMEA). |
NM Not meaningful.
17
SELECTED REVENUE AND EXPENSE ITEMS
Revenues
Net interest revenue in 2006 was $39.5 billion, up $248 million, or 1%, from net interest revenue of $39.2 billion in 2005. Increases in business volumes during 2006 were
offset by spread compression, as the Companys cost of funding increased more significantly than the rates on interest-earning assets, and due to a $666 million charge against net interest revenue related to changes in Japan consumer lending
laws in International Consumer Finance. Rates on the Companys interest-earning assets were affected by competitive pricing, as well as business mix shifts. Net interest revenue in 2005 decreased $2.4 billion, or 6%, from 2004 as the
impact of spread compression and competitive pricing exceeded increases in business volumes.
Total commissions and fees and administration
and other fiduciary fees revenue of $26.5 billion was up $3.2 billion, or 14%, in 2006. Strong investment banking results, higher business volumes in transaction services, the integration of Legg Mason in Smith Barney, and the absence of a
$565 million write-off of deferred rewards costs recorded in 2005 drove the increase. The 2005 total commissions and fees and administration and other fiduciary fees revenue of $23.3 billion was up $1.8 billion, or 8%, from 2004. The 2005 increase
was attributable to the mark-to-market of Consumer Lending mortgage servicing assets, higher transactional volumes, and strong results in bank card fees and investment banking, offset by the write-off of deferred rewards costs.
Insurance premiums of $3.2 billion in 2006 were up $70 million, or 2%, from 2005 and up $406 million, or 15%, in 2005 compared to 2004. The consecutive
year-over-year increases were driven by higher business volumes.
Principal transactions revenues of $7.7 billion in 2006 increased $1.3
billion, or 20%, from 2005, primarily in equity markets. Principal transactions revenue in 2005 increased $2.7 billion, or 73%, from 2004, primarily driven by the fixed income and equity markets.
Realized gains from sales of investments of $1.8 billion in 2006 were down $171 million from 2005, due to the absence of 2005 gains of $484 million on the
sale of portions of St. Paul Travelers shares in Alternative Investments and of $386 million on the sale of Nikko Cordial stock in CIB, offset by 2006 gains of $252 million on the sale of $23.4 billion of mortgage-backed securities in Consumer
Lending, and $225 million on the sale of the remaining St. Paul Travelers shares in Alternative Investments. The increase from 2004 of $1.1 billion was primarily attributable to the gains on the sale of Nikko Cordial stock and sales of St. Paul
Travelers shares over the course of the year.
Other revenue of $11.0 billion in 2006 increased $1.4 billion, or 14%, from 2005, primarily
driven by a $234 million gain on the sale of Avantel in International Retail Banking and higher replenishment gains from securitization activities as well as higher net excess spread revenues from previously securitized receivables in U.S.
Cards, offset by a decrease in Alternative Investments due to lower investment performance. Other revenue increased $365 million, or 4%, from $9.2 billion in 2004 to $9.6 billion in 2005. This was due to higher securitization activity in U.S.
Cards and positive investment performance in Alternative Investments offset by the absence of the $1.2 billion gain on the sale of Samba recorded in 2004.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $6.9 billion, or 15%, to $52.0 billion in 2006. The increase was primarily in compensation and benefits due to higher headcount, increased
incentive compensation in CIB, and SFAS 123(R) costs, as well as investment spending. Operating expenses of $45.2 billion in 2005 declined $4.6 billion, or 9%, from 2004. The decrease was due to the absence of a reserve charge of $7.9 billion for
the WorldCom and Litigation Reserve Charge and $400 million related to Private Bank Japan Exit Plan Charge recorded in 2004, offset by a $600 million release from the WorldCom and Litigation Reserve Charge and increased expenses related to higher
incentive compensation in CIB and higher pension and insurance expenses.
Global Consumer reported an 11% increase from 2005 to 2006.
U.S. Consumer increased 5% on increased business volumes and investments in new branches. International Consumer increased 18% primarily due to branch expansions and the integration of CrediCard. International Consumer primarily
drove the increase of 5% from 2004 to 2005 in Global Consumer as a result of branch expansion and repositioning charges.
CIB reported a 21%
rise in expenses over the prior year as a result of higher incentive compensation (due to revenue increase of 14%), SFAS 123(R) costs and the absence of the reserve release from the WorldCom and Litigation Reserve Charge in 2005.
Global Wealth Management expenses increased 20% driven by costs associated with the integration of the financial consultants from Legg Mason and SFAS
123(R) costs. The change in expenses from 2004 to 2005 was flat.
Alternative Investments increased 21% from the prior year, which was up
37% from 2004, due to compensation expenses.
Provisions for Credit Losses and for Benefits and Claims
The provision for credit losses for 2006 was $7.0 billion, down $1.2 billion, or 15%, from 2005, which in turn, was up $1.9 billion from 2004. Policyholder benefits and
claims were $967 million, $867 million, and $884 million for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Global Consumer provisions for loan losses
and for policyholder benefits and claims of $7.6 billion in 2006 were down $1.5 billion, or 16% from 2005.
The declines in consumer were
mainly due to lower bankruptcy filings, a stable credit environment that drove lower net credit loss ratios, and the absence of a $490 million charge to standardize the EMEA consumer loan write-off policies with the global write-off policy in
the prior year.
Offsetting these declines were increases: in the Mexico cards portfolio; in Asia, primarily related to
industry-wide credit conditions in the Taiwan cards market; and in Japan, primarily related to legislative and other actions affecting the consumer finance industry in that country.
The increase from 2004 of $966 million, or 12%, to $9.1 billion in 2005 was primarily due to increases in International Retail Banking, U.S.
Retail Distribution, International Cards, and U.S. Commercial Business, partially offset by decreases in U.S. Cards, International Consumer Finance and U.S. Consumer Lending. Net credit losses were $7.262 billion, and the
related loss ratio was 1.52% in 2006, as compared to $8.683 billion and 2.01% in 2005 and $8.471 billion and 2.13% in 2004.
18
The CIB provision for credit losses in 2006 increased $401 million from 2005 to $359 million. The 2005 provision was up $933 million from 2004. The
increase in 2006 primarily resulted from the absence of gross credit recoveries in the prior year. Corporate cash-basis loans at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $535 million, $1.004 billion and $1.906 billion, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate on continuing operations of
27.3% in 2006 declined from 30.8% in 2005. The 2006 tax provision on continuing operations included a $598 million benefit from the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit and a $237 million benefit from the resolution of the New York Tax Audits. The
2005 tax provision on continuing operations included a $198 million benefit from the Homeland Investment Act provision of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 net of the impact of remitting income earned in 2005 and prior years that would
otherwise have been indefinitely invested overseas, and a $65 million release due to the resolution of an audit. The 2006 effective tax rate also declined from 2005 because of the impact of increased indefinitely invested international earnings. The
Companys effective tax rate on continuing operations was 28.4% in 2004. See additional discussion on page 15 and in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 130.
The net income line in the following business
segment and operating unit discussions excludes the cumulative effect of accounting change and income from discontinued operations. The cumulative effect of accounting change and income from discontinued operations are disclosed within the
Corporate/Other business segment. See Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 129 and 138, respectively. Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
19
GLOBAL CONSUMER
Citigroups Global Consumer Group provides a wide array of banking, lending, insurance and investment services through a
network of 8,110 branches, approximately 18,800 ATMs, and 809 Automated Lending Machines (ALMs), the Internet, telephone and mail, and the Primerica Financial Services salesforce. Global Consumer serves more than 200 million customer accounts,
providing products and services to meet the financial needs of both individuals and small businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
29,301 |
|
|
$ |
29,526 |
|
|
$ |
30,766 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
(4 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
20,998 |
|
|
|
18,719 |
|
|
|
17,121 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
9 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
50,299 |
|
|
$ |
48,245 |
|
|
$ |
47,887 |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
25,933 |
|
|
|
23,318 |
|
|
|
22,151 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
5 |
|
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
9,063 |
|
|
|
8,097 |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
12 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
16,787 |
|
|
$ |
15,864 |
|
|
$ |
17,639 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
(10 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(12 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
5 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,056 |
|
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
$ |
11,987 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
(9 |
)% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
28,168 |
|
|
$ |
26,857 |
|
|
$ |
22,816 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average managed loans |
|
$ |
531.6 |
|
|
$ |
482.2 |
|
|
$ |
439.9 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Average deposits |
|
$ |
252.1 |
|
|
$ |
231.7 |
|
|
$ |
213.6 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
EOP AUMs |
|
$ |
219.6 |
|
|
$ |
188.0 |
|
|
$ |
168.2 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Total branches |
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
20
U.S. Consumer
U.S. Consumer is comprised of four businesses: Cards, Retail Distribution, Consumer Lending and Commercial
Business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
16,646 |
|
|
$ |
17,510 |
|
|
$ |
19,706 |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
(11 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
13,948 |
|
|
|
12,597 |
|
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
30,594 |
|
|
$ |
30,107 |
|
|
$ |
30,907 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
(3 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
14,149 |
|
|
|
13,449 |
|
|
|
13,214 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
2 |
|
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,444 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
3 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
12,645 |
|
|
$ |
11,058 |
|
|
$ |
12,249 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
(10 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
7 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,390 |
|
|
$ |
7,173 |
|
|
$ |
8,010 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
(10 |
)% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
15,394 |
|
|
$ |
13,843 |
|
|
$ |
11,507 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average managed loans |
|
$ |
416.8 |
|
|
$ |
375.7 |
|
|
$ |
346.1 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Average deposits |
|
$ |
104.6 |
|
|
$ |
95.4 |
|
|
$ |
88.5 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
EOP AUMs |
|
$ |
81.4 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
Total branches (actual number) |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
21
U.S. Cards
U.S. Cards is one of the largest providers of credit cards in North America, with more than 150 million customer
accounts in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. In addition to MasterCard (including Diners), Visa, and American Express, U.S. Cards is the largest provider of credit card services to the oil and gas industry and the leading provider
of consumer private-label credit cards and commercial accounts on behalf of merchants such as The Home Depot, Federated, Sears, Dell Computer, Radio Shack, Staples and Zales Corporation.
Revenues are primarily generated from net interest revenue on receivables, interchange fees on purchase sales and other delinquency and servicing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
4,626 |
|
|
$ |
5,304 |
|
|
$ |
7,445 |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
(29 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
7,520 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
11 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
13,508 |
|
|
$ |
12,824 |
|
|
$ |
14,207 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
(10 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
6,002 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
2,887 |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
(11 |
) |
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
5,953 |
|
|
$ |
4,255 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
(21 |
)% |
Income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
3,890 |
|
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
|
$ |
3,562 |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
(23 |
)% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
(11 |
)% |
Return on assets |
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
5,581 |
|
|
$ |
5,774 |
|
|
$ |
4,125 |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
40 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators on a managed basis: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on managed assets |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase sales |
|
$ |
304.3 |
|
|
$ |
278.2 |
|
|
$ |
257.0 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
Managed average yield (2) |
|
|
14.02 |
% |
|
|
13.75 |
% |
|
|
13.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed net interest margin (2) |
|
|
10.26 |
% |
|
|
10.85 |
% |
|
|
11.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
(2) |
As a percentage of average managed loans. |
22
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue declined, reflecting lower on-balance
sheet receivables, a change in the mix of receivables toward introductory rate products, and a higher cost of funds, which was partially offset by higher risk-based fees. Non-Interest Revenue increased due to the positive impact of a 9%
growth in purchase sales, higher replenishment gains from securitization activities, and higher net excess spread revenues from previously securitized receivables. Also driving the increase was the acquisition of the Federated portfolio in the 2005
fourth quarter, and the absence of a $545 million charge to conform accounting practices for customer reward taken in the 2005 fourth quarter. These increases were partially offset by lower fee revenues due to lower bankruptcy filings and higher
rewards program costs.
Operating expenses increased slightly, primarily reflecting the full-year impact of the acquisition of the
Federated portfolio as well as the adoption of SFAS 123(R), partially offset by effective expense management and a decline in advertising and marketing expenses, largely reflecting the timing of advertising campaigns.
Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined, primarily reflecting lower bankruptcies and the favorable credit environment which
led to a 35% decline in net credit losses and a continued decline in loan loss reserves.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue declined as pricing actions in
floating rate products were offset by: higher cost of funds; higher payment rates resulting from the overall improved economy and a customer shift to real-estate-secured lending, which led to lower loan balances; an increased proportion of
transactional activity; and a mix shift in the private label business to lower-rate products. Non-Interest Revenue increased as the positive impact of 8% growth in purchase sales and the addition of the Federated portfolio in the 2005 fourth
quarter more than offset a $545 million charge to conform accounting practices for customer rewards.
Operating expenses remained
essentially unchanged, primarily reflecting the addition of the Federated portfolio and repositioning expenses of $19 million taken in the 2005 first quarter. This was partially offset by a decline in advertising and marketing expenses, largely
reflecting the timing of advertising campaigns, as the Company invested significant resources in 2004 in the Live Richly and Identity Theft media campaigns.
Provision for loan losses declined, due to a $789 million, or 22%, decline in net credit losses, resulting from the positive credit environment and
improvements in the Sears portfolio, partially offset by lower credit reserve releases in 2005 of $170 million, versus $639 million in 2004.
23
U.S. Retail Distribution
U.S. Retail Distribution provides banking, lending, investment and insurance products and services to customers through
972 Citibank branches, 2,469 CitiFinancial branches, the Primerica Financial Services (PFS) salesforce, the Internet, direct mail and telesales. Revenues are primarily derived from net interest revenue on loans and deposits, and fees on banking,
insurance and investment products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
5,980 |
|
|
$ |
5,957 |
|
|
$ |
5,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
(1 |
) |
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
9,584 |
|
|
$ |
9,515 |
|
|
$ |
9,345 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
2 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
1 |
|
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
19 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,698 |
|
|
$ |
2,970 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
(9 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
2,027 |
|
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
(13 |
)% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank branches |
|
$ |
3,149 |
|
|
$ |
3,103 |
|
|
$ |
3,065 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
CitiFinancial branches |
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Primerica Financial Services |
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
9,584 |
|
|
$ |
9,515 |
|
|
$ |
9,345 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
2 |
% |
Net income by business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank branches |
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
(2 |
)% |
CitiFinancial branches |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Primerica Financial Services |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
2,027 |
|
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
(13 |
)% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
3,552 |
|
|
$ |
2,977 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans |
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
Average deposits |
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
|
$ |
78.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.0 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
EOP Investment AUMs |
|
$ |
81.4 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
24
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue was approximately even with the prior
year as growth in deposits and loans, each up 10%, were largely offset by net interest margin compression. Net interest margin declined primarily due to a shift in customer liabilities from savings and other demand deposits to certificates of
deposit and e-Savings accounts. Non-Interest Revenue increased slightly on a $132 million gain on the Sale of New York Branches in the 2006 second quarter, higher investment product sales, and higher banking fees. Offsetting these increases
was the absence of a $110 million gain in the 2005 first quarter related to the resolution of the Glendale litigation.
Operating
expense growth was primarily driven by higher volume-related expenses, increased investment spending on 303 new branch openings during the year (101 in Citibank and 202 in CitiFinancial), the impact of SFAS 123(R), and costs associated with the
launch of e-Savings.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined primarily due to the absence of a $165 million
loan loss reserve build in the 2005 third quarter related to the reorganization of the former Consumer Finance business, a prior-year reserve build related to Hurricane Katrina of $110 million in CitiFinancial branches, and lower overall bankruptcy
filings in the current year. The net credit loss ratio declined 81 basis points to 2.67%. Overall credit conditions remained favorable in 2006.
Deposit growth reflected balance increases in certificates of deposit, e-Savings accounts (which generated $9.9 billion in end-of-period deposits), premium checking and partly rate-sensitive money market products as well as the
impact of the FAB acquisition. Loan growth reflected improvements in all channels and products. Investment product sales in Citibank branches increased 26%, driven by favorable market conditions and additional distribution points.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue increased primarily due to deposit and loan growth of 5% and 7%, respectively, which were partially offset by a decrease in net interest
margin. Net interest margin declined as higher short-term funding rates more than offset an increase in asset yields. Non-Interest Revenue was flat to the prior-year period. Increased investment product sales, the impact of the FAB
acquisition, and the gain of $110 million related to the resolution of the Glendale litigation in the 2005 first quarter were offset by lower banking fees and a $20 million charge in the 2005 fourth quarter to conform accounting practices for
customer rewards.
Operating expense growth was primarily due to higher volume-related expenses, increased investment spending driven
by branch expansion, and the impact of the FAB acquisition.
Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased due to
an increase in bankruptcy filings from a change in law that became effective on October 17, 2005. This led to an approximately $93 million increase in net credit losses and a $42 million increase in loan loss reserves. In addition, the Company
increased loan loss reserves by $110 million for the impact of Hurricane Katrina. Also, the reorganization of the former Consumer Finance business into components of the current U.S. Retail Distribution and U.S. Consumer Lending
businesses resulted in a reallocation of loan loss reserves between U.S. Retail Distribution and U.S. Consumer Lending. CitiFinancial Branches increased loan loss reserves by $165 million, reflecting an increase in reserves for
bankruptcy coverage in Personal Loans, while Real Estate Lending and Auto (both now in U.S. Consumer Lending) had corresponding loan loss reserve releases of $76 million and $89 million, respectively. Excluding the impact of increased
bankruptcy filings and Hurricane Katrina, overall credit conditions remained favorable in 2005.
Deposit growth reflected an increase
in demand balances and rate-sensitive money market balances, as well as the impact of the FAB acquisition. Loan growth reflected improvements in all channels and products from home equity and personal loans to increased volumes in the PFS
channel. Investment product sales increased 9% driven by increased volumes.
25
U.S. Consumer Lending
U.S. Consumer Lending provides home mortgages and home equity loans to prime and non-prime customers, auto financing to
non-prime consumers and educational loans to students. Loans are originated throughout the United States and Canada through the Citibank, CitiFinancial and Smith Barney branch networks, Primerica Financial Services agents, third-party
brokers, direct mail, the Internet and telesales. Loans are also purchased in the wholesale markets. U.S. Consumer Lending also provides mortgage servicing to a portfolio of mortgage loans owned by third parties. Revenues are comprised of
loan fees, net interest revenue and mortgage servicing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
4,841 |
|
|
$ |
4,931 |
|
|
$ |
4,915 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
NM |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
5,519 |
|
|
$ |
5,469 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
4 |
|
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
3,046 |
|
|
$ |
3,155 |
|
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
14 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
10 |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
7 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
16 |
% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Lending |
|
$ |
3,620 |
|
|
$ |
3,558 |
|
|
$ |
3,196 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
Student Loans |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
7 |
|
Auto |
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
5,519 |
|
|
$ |
5,469 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
Net income by business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Lending |
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
17 |
% |
Student Loans |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
3 |
|
Auto |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
27 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
16 |
% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
3,930 |
|
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
|
$ |
2,689 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Lending |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loans |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
8.78 |
% |
|
|
10.52 |
% |
|
|
11.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Lending |
|
$ |
142.1 |
|
|
$ |
131.9 |
|
|
$ |
115.3 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
14 |
% |
Student Loans |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
38 |
% |
Auto |
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
(2) |
As a percentage of average loans. |
26
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue declined, reflecting net interest
margin compression that was partially offset by a 19% increase in average loan balances. Non-Interest Revenue increased on higher gains on sales of real estate loans, student loans, and mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by lower
servicing revenues. Average loan growth reflected a strong increase in originations, with increases in real estate and auto lending of 8% and 42%, respectively.
During 2006, the Real Estate business expanded its Mortgage-Backed Securities Program as part of an integrated mortgage business model that includes origination, purchase, investing, securitizing and servicing. At
December 31, 2006, the balance in mortgage-backed securities was $66 billion, and the balance in real estate loans was $173 billion. From time to time the Company may vary the mix of loans and securities depending on the opportunities and other
factors affecting the portfolio. In 2006, realized gains on sales of these securities totaled $252 million.
Operating expenses
increased primarily due to higher loan origination volumes, investment spending, and the impact of SFAS 123(R).
Provisions for loan
losses and for benefits and claims increased primarily on higher credit losses in the Real Estate Lending and Auto businesses, partially offset by higher loan loss reserve releases of $63 million in the Real Estate business. Credit losses
increased due to volume growth and seasoning in Real Estate, as well as volume growth in Autos.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue was flat compared to the prior-year
period as a 20% increase in average loan balances was offset by net interest margin compression. Non-Interest Revenue increased due to improved net servicing revenues, higher securitization and portfolio sales gains, and the benefit of the
Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc. (PRMI) acquisition. The increase in net revenues was driven by the absence of a loss in the prior year due to servicing hedge ineffectiveness caused by the volatile rate environment. Average loan growth reflected
a 16% increase in originations across all businesses.
Operating expenses increased primarily due to higher volumes and the impact of
the PRMI acquisition.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased due to lower net credit losses of $136
million, primarily in the Auto and Real Estate Lending businesses, partially offset by lower loan loss reserve releases of $91 million. The lower loan loss reserve releases reflected a $110 million reserve build related to the estimated impact of
Hurricane Katrina in the 2005 third quarter, partially offset by reserve releases of $89 million in Auto and $76 million in Real Estate Lending related to the reorganization of the U.S. Consumer Finance businesses. The continued favorable
credit environment drove a decline in the net credit loss ratio.
A 20% increase in prime mortgage originations and home equity loans drove
loan growth. Non-prime mortgage originations declined 20%, reflecting the Companys decision to avoid offering teaser rate and interest-only mortgages to lower FICO score customers.
27
U.S. Commercial Business
U.S. Commercial Business provides equipment leasing, financing, and banking services to small- and middle-market
businesses ($5 million to $500 million in annual revenues) and financing for investor-owned multifamily and commercial properties. Revenues are comprised of net interest revenue and fees on loans and leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
$ |
1,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
(17 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
41 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
1,983 |
|
|
$ |
2,299 |
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
|
(33 |
)% |
|
(14 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
(35 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
(5 |
)% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
3 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
|
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
(8 |
)% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earning assets |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
(2 |
)% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
NM Not meaningful
28
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue declined as continued net interest
margin compression was offset by growth in core loan and deposit balances, up 15% and 9%, respectively. Non-Interest Revenue declined primarily due to the absence of the $162 million legal settlement benefit in the 2005 third quarter related
to the purchase of Copelco, and the $161 million gain on sale of the CitiCapital Transportation Finance business in the 2005 first quarter, partly offset by the $31 million gain on the Sale of New York Branches in the 2006 second quarter.
Operating expense growth was primarily from higher volume-related expenses, the absence of a $23 million expense benefit due to the
Copelco settlement recorded in the prior-year and SFAS 123(R); these were partially offset by lower expenses from the absence of the transportation finance business and severance costs in the prior year.
Provision for loan losses declined primarily due to higher loan loss reserve releases of $63 million from a favorable credit environment, and the
continued liquidation of non-core portfolios.
Deposit and core loan growth reflected strong transaction volumes and balances across
all business units, partially offset by declines in the liquidating portfolio.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue declined primarily due to the continuing impact of net interest margin compression, partially offset by strong growth in core loan and deposit
balances, up 13% and 20%, respectively. Non-Interest Revenue increased primarily due to a $162 million legal settlement benefit in the 2005 third quarter related to the purchase of Copelco, a $161 million gain on the sale of the CitiCapital
Transportation Finance business in the 2005 first quarter, and the reclassification of operating leases from loans to other assets and the related operating lease depreciation expense from revenue to expense. The reclassification of operating leases
increased both revenues and expenses by $123 million. The impact of the FAB acquisition also contributed to higher revenues.
Operating
expenses increased primarily due to the impact of the operating lease reclassification from revenue to expense of $123 million and the impact of the FAB acquisition, partially offset by lower expenses from the sold transportation finance
businesses and a $23 million expense benefit related to the Copelco legal settlement.
Provision for loan losses increased primarily
due to the absence of $216 million in loan loss reserve releases during 2004, partially offset by lower net credit losses due to an improved credit environment and the continued liquidation of non-core portfolios.
Deposit and core loan growth reflected strong transaction volumes and balances across all business units and the impact of the FAB acquisition,
partially offset by declines in the liquidating portfolio, primarily due to the impact of the sale of the CitiCapital Transportation Finance business.
29
U.S. CONSUMER OUTLOOK
Certain of the statements below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
In 2007, the U.S. Consumer
businesses will focus on continued expansion of its customer base, investments in expanding the branch network, offering a more integrated set of products and services, and the benefit of acquisitions and strategic investments made previously. The
businesses will also focus on tight expense control, productivity improvements and effective credit management. Revenues and credit performance will be affected by U.S. economic conditions, including the level of interest rates, bankruptcy filings
and unemployment rates.
In 2007, the U.S. Consumer business is expected to operate in a stable economic environment. Net interest
revenue pressure is expected to continue, but at a lesser pace, due to the flat yield curve and the competitive pricing environment. Credit costs are expected to increase slightly as the unusually low bankruptcy filings experienced in 2006 are
expected to rise back to more normalized levels. Inflation is expected to remain well-contained.
U.S. CardsIn 2007, the
competitive environment is expected to remain challenging. U.S. Cards expects to generate earnings growth as managed receivables increase and expenses remain controlled through improved productivity levels and efficiencies of scale. Growth in
managed receivables will be driven by new product launches and private-label expansion. Credit costs will increase slightly from the unusually favorable credit environment in 2006, reflecting increased bankruptcy filing levels.
U.S. Retail DistributionIn 2007, U.S. Retail Distribution expects to generate increases in loans, deposits and accounts, which will in
turn drive
earnings growth. The business expects to continue to expand its footprint with a continued program of new branch openings in both the Citibank and
CitiFinancial businesses, to continue to grow our Citibank Direct business and to expand cross-marketing opportunities. The challenging interest rate environment is expected to continue, with a corresponding shift in deposits to lower-profit
time deposits and CDs, which will affect revenue growth. Credit costs are expected to increase slightly, as unusually low bankruptcy levels in 2006 are expected to rise back to more normalized levels.
U.S. Consumer LendingIn 2007, U.S. Consumer Lending expects to generate earnings growth across its product lines. In Real Estate
Lending, an expected decline in the level of new housing starts and existing home sales is expected to be mitigated by an increase in the Retail Distribution network of branches, higher sales from Primerica agents and the Smith Barney
network, and from the acquisition of ABN AMRO Mortgage Group. With the acquisition of ABN AMRO, the combined company will move from number five to number four in mortgage loan servicing and strengthen CitiMortgages number three market position
in originations, based on 2006 third quarter data. Results are also expected to reflect higher portfolio balances and servicing activities. Credit costs are expected to increase modestly due to seasoning in the rapidly growing Home Equity portfolio.
U.S. Commercial BusinessIn 2007, U.S. Commercial Business expects to generate increases in loans, deposits and accounts by
continuing to expand its core business portfolio and through leveraging the expanded Retail Branch network. The business will also focus on tight expense control, effective credit management, and productivity improvements. The credit environment is
expected to remain stable.
30
International Consumer
International Consumer is comprised of three businesses: Cards, Consumer Finance and Retail Banking.
International Consumer operates in five geographies: Mexico, Latin America, EMEA, Japan, and Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
12,866 |
|
|
$ |
12,180 |
|
|
$ |
11,188 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
19 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
19,795 |
|
|
$ |
18,396 |
|
|
$ |
16,424 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
|
9,520 |
|
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
11 |
|
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
31 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
4,815 |
|
|
$ |
5,413 |
|
|
$ |
5,222 |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
4 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
(2 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
$ |
4,098 |
|
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
6 |
% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
5,191 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
|
$ |
3,607 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
13 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
5,387 |
|
|
|
5,201 |
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
10 |
|
Japan |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
Asia |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,461 |
|
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
17 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
19,795 |
|
|
$ |
18,396 |
|
|
$ |
16,424 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
(20 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Japan |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
15 |
|
Asia |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
$ |
4,098 |
|
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
6 |
% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
2.20 |
% |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
12,774 |
|
|
$ |
13,014 |
|
|
$ |
11,309 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
15 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average managed loans |
|
$ |
114.8 |
|
|
$ |
106.5 |
|
|
$ |
93.8 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
14 |
% |
Average deposits |
|
$ |
147.5 |
|
|
$ |
136.3 |
|
|
$ |
125.1 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
EOP AUMs |
|
$ |
138.2 |
|
|
$ |
115.4 |
|
|
$ |
99.7 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
16 |
% |
Total branches (actual number) |
|
|
4,669 |
|
|
|
4,064 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
NM Not meaningful.
31
International Cards
International Cards provides MasterCard, Visa and Diners branded credit and charge cards, as well as private label cards
and co-branded cards, to more than 30 million customer accounts in 43 countries outside of the U.S. and Canada. Revenues are primarily generated from net interest revenue on receivables, interchange fees on purchase sales and other delinquency
and servicing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
|
$ |
2,776 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
20 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
5,959 |
|
|
$ |
4,850 |
|
|
$ |
4,074 |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
19 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
11 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
45 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
21 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
24 |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
21 |
% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
1,826 |
|
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
51 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
6 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
10 |
|
Japan |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
2 |
|
Asia |
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
13 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
5,959 |
|
|
$ |
4,850 |
|
|
$ |
4,074 |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
19 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
50 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
15 |
|
Japan |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
(25 |
) |
Asia |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
16 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
21 |
% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
24 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
45 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase sales |
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
|
$ |
68.7 |
|
|
$ |
59.1 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
16 |
% |
Average yield (2) |
|
|
19.09 |
% |
|
|
17.82 |
% |
|
|
16.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
13.83 |
% |
|
|
12.38 |
% |
|
|
12.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
(2) |
As a percentage of average loans. |
NM Not meaningful
32
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue increased, driven by a 20% growth in
average receivables and the integration of the CrediCard portfolio in Latin America. The Non-Interest Revenue increase reflected a 17% increase in purchase sales, the integration of the CrediCard portfolio, and a gain on the MasterCard
IPO of $35 million in the 2006 second quarter, partially offset by the absence of a prior-year gain on the sale of a merchant-acquiring business in EMEA of $95 million. The positive impact of foreign currency translation also contributed to
the increase in both net interest revenue and non-interest revenue.
Operating expenses increased, reflecting the integration of the
CrediCard portfolio, volume growth across the regions, continued investment spending, the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the impact of foreign currency translation, and the absence of prior-year expense credits related to Mexico VAT.
Provision for loan losses increased, driven by portfolio growth and target market expansion in Mexico, the industry-wide credit
deterioration in Taiwan, credit losses relating to the CrediCard integration in Latin America, and volume growth in all regions.
Regional Net Income
Mexico income declined primarily due to lower levels of tax benefits and higher expenses, partially offset by higher sales volumes and average
loans from portfolio growth and target market expansion (which increased both revenues and the provision for loan losses), and a gain from the MasterCard IPO. Latin America income increased, primarily due to volume and purchase sales growth.
EMEA income declined, reflecting absence of the prior-year gain on the sale of a merchant-acquiring business of $57 million and higher net credit losses, partially offset by higher purchase sales, volume growth, and higher tax benefits.
Asia income declined due to an increase in credit costs related to credit conditions in Taiwan and costs associated with a Korea labor settlement, partially offset by higher purchase sales and loan growth.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue increased primarily due to growth in purchase sales and average loans, as well as the impact of
the KorAm acquisition, and the impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by spread compression. Volume growth was diversified across regions, led by Mexico. Net interest spread compression reflected rising funding costs and a
primarily fixed rate portfolio.
Non-Interest Revenue increased, primarily driven by a gain on the sale of a merchant-acquiring
business in EMEA of $95 million, higher purchase sales, the impact of the KorAm acquisition, and the impact of foreign currency translation. This was partially offset by the absence of a prior-year gain on the sale of Orbitall (credit card
processing company in Brazil) of $42 million.
Operating expenses increased, primarily driven by the impact of higher expansion
expenses in Asia and EMEA, integration expenses of CrediCard in the Brazil franchise, the KorAm acquisition, and the impact of foreign currency translations. A VAT refund in Mexico during the 2005 third quarter partially offset
expense growth.
Provision for loan losses reflected an increase in net credit losses, due primarily to volume growth in
Mexico, which was partially offset by declines in Asia. During 2005, loan loss reserves increased by $175 million, reflecting portfolio expansion and the absence of prior-year reserve releases of $103 million, recorded mostly in
Asia and Latin America.
Regional Net Income
Mexico income increased due to higher sales volumes and average loans, as well as a tax benefit related to the Homeland Investment Act and the VAT refund. Latin America income declined primarily due to the 2004 gain on the
sale of Orbitall and the absence of 2004 credit reserve releases. EMEA income increased primarily due to the gain on the sale of a merchant-acquiring business, partially offset by increased expense related to business expansion and customer
acquisition initiatives. Japan income declined primarily due to tax credits received in 2004. Asia income increased due to strong sales, loan balance increases, and improved net credit loss experience.
33
International Consumer Finance
International Consumer Finance provides community-based lending services through a branch network, centralized sales
platforms and cross-selling initiatives with International Cards and International Retail Banking. As of December 31, 2006, International Consumer Finance maintained 2,588 sales points comprised of 1,779 branches in more
than 25 countries, and 809 Automated Loan Machines (ALMs) in Japan. International Consumer Finance offers real-estate-secured loans, unsecured or partially secured personal loans, auto loans, and loans to finance consumer-goods
purchases. Revenues are primarily derived from net interest revenue and fees on loan products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
3,149 |
|
|
$ |
3,674 |
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
2% |
|
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
77 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
3,318 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
3,682 |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
4% |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
(7) |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
935 |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
11% |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
16 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
(94 |
)% |
|
10% |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
12% |
|
Latin America |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
28 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Japan |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
(2) |
|
Asia |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
65 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,318 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
3,682 |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Net income (loss) by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
(12)% |
|
Latin America |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(64) |
|
EMEA |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
(71) |
|
Japan |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
40 |
|
Asia |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
90 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
(94 |
)% |
|
10% |
|
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
% |
|
Return on assets |
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
(8)% |
|
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield (2) |
|
|
16.06 |
% |
|
|
18.68 |
% |
|
|
18.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
13.23 |
% |
|
|
16.48 |
% |
|
|
16.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of sales points: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other branches |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
50% |
|
Japan branches |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
(58 |
)% |
|
(20)% |
|
Japan Automated Loan Machines |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
33% |
|
Total |
|
|
2,588 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
28% |
|
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
(2) |
As a percentage of average loans. |
NM Not meaningful
34
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue declined, driven by lower results in
Japan due to the recent changes in the operating environment and the passage of changes to consumer lending laws on December 13, 2006. The total impact included a $581 million pretax charge to increase reserves for estimated losses due
to customer settlements. Excluding Japan, Net Interest Revenue increased 23% from the prior year, driven by higher volumes in Asia, Latin America, and Mexico. Non-Interest Revenue increased, primarily on
higher insurance and other fees and the impact of foreign currency translation.
Operating expense increased primarily due to a $60
million pretax repositioning charge in Japan to close approximately 270 branches and 100 ALMs. Excluding Japan, expenses increased primarily due to investment spending, with 520 new branch openings and higher volume-related expenses.
Provision for loan losses increased primarily due to legislative and other actions affecting the consumer finance industry in
Japan, including loan loss reserve builds and higher net credit losses. An increase in net credit losses in EMEA and Asia, driven by higher volumes, also contributed to higher credit costs in 2006. The increases were partially
offset by the absence of the standardization of the loan write-off policy in Spain and Italy in the 2005 third quarter.
The increase in
average loans outside of Japan was mainly driven by growth in the personal loan and real-estate-secured portfolios. In Japan, average loans declined by 5%, due to the impact of foreign currency translation and tightened credit
related to the passing of changes to consumer lending laws.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue increased, driven by growth in all regions except Japan, mainly due to higher loan volumes. Net Interest Revenue in Japan
declined due to lower personal and real-estate- secured loan balances, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation. Non-Interest Revenue increased primarily on higher insurance and other fees and the impact of foreign
currency translation.
Operating expense increased, reflecting the impact of investment spending associated with the expansion of 376
branches outside of Japan and repositioning charges in EMEA during the 2005 first quarter of $38 million. These were partially offset by declines in Japan due to the closing of branches and the transition to ALMs.
Provision for loan losses declined due to improved credit conditions, including lower bankruptcy losses in Japan of $96 million. This was
partially offset by higher personal loan losses in the U.K., standardization of the loan write-off policy in Spain and Italy, and lower credit reserve releases. The net credit loss ratio declined 61 basis points to 5.75%.
Growth in average loans was mainly driven by increases in the real-estate-secured and personal-loan portfolios in EMEA and Asia,
partially offset by a decline in EMEA auto loans. In Japan, average loans declined by 10%, due to the impact of higher pay-downs, reduced loan demand, and the impact of foreign currency translation.
35
International Retail Banking
International Retail Banking delivers a wide array of banking, lending, insurance and investment services through a
network of local branches and electronic delivery systems, including ATMs, call centers and the Internet. International Retail Banking serves 52 million customer accounts for individuals and small businesses. Revenues are primarily
derived from net interest revenue on deposits and loans, and fees on mortgage, banking, and investment products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,730 |
|
|
$ |
5,237 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
16 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
|
$ |
9,727 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
5,537 |
|
|
|
4,939 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
12 |
|
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
86 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
3,335 |
|
|
$ |
2,738 |
|
|
$ |
2,950 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
(7 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(17 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
2,840 |
|
|
$ |
2,083 |
|
|
$ |
2,157 |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
(3 |
)% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
3,129 |
|
|
$ |
2,878 |
|
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
14 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
3,314 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
11 |
|
Japan |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Asia |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
16 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
|
$ |
9,727 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
49 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
(20 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Japan |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
(18 |
) |
Asia |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
9 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
2,840 |
|
|
$ |
2,083 |
|
|
$ |
2,157 |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
(3 |
)% |
Average assets (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Return on assets |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
9,470 |
|
|
$ |
10,302 |
|
|
$ |
9,067 |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
14 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average deposits |
|
$ |
147.5 |
|
|
$ |
136.3 |
|
|
$ |
125.1 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
AUMs (EOP) |
|
$ |
138.2 |
|
|
$ |
115.4 |
|
|
$ |
103.4 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Average loans |
|
$ |
64.1 |
|
|
$ |
61.7 |
|
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
15 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
36
2006 vs. 2005
Net Interest Revenue increased, reflecting growth in loans
and deposits of 4% and 8%, respectively. Non-Interest Revenue increased primarily due to improvements in all regions except Japan, driven by an increase in investment product sales of 36%, the 2006 fourth quarter $234 million gain in
Mexico on the sale of Avantel, increased insurance and other banking fees, and the impact of foreign currency translation. Assets under management grew by 20%.
Operating expenses increased on increased investment spending (which included 342 new branch openings), higher business volumes, SFAS 123(R) charges, higher advertising and marketing costs, and the costs
associated with the labor settlement in Korea.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined primarily due to the
absence of the 2005 third quarter charge of $476 million to standardize the loan write-off policy in Germany and Belgium and the 2005 second quarter increase of $127 million in the Germany credit reserve to reflect increased experience with the
effects of bankruptcy law liberalization. Additionally, the decline was due to a $159 million gain from the sale of charged-off assets in Germany, and a $168 million loan loss reserve release in Korea related to improvements in the
credit environment in this market.
Net income in 2006 also reflected higher tax benefits in Mexico and Asia, including
utilization of $288 million of APB 23 benefits in Mexico, a 2006 first quarter $55 million benefit from the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit, an $18 million benefit related to the resolution of the New York Tax Audits, and the impact of a
lower overall effective tax rate, partially offset by the absence of a 2005 third quarter Homeland Investment Act tax benefit of $61 million in Mexico.
Regional Net Income
Mexico income growth was driven by a 2006 fourth quarter $145 million after-tax gain on the sale
of Avantel, utilization in 2006 of APB 23 tax benefits totaling $288 million, and growth in average loans and deposits. Partially offsetting the income growth was the absence of both a $79 million prior- year value added tax refund and a $50 million
gain from the favorable impact of restructuring Mexican government bonds, net interest margin compression, and higher expenses from increased investment spending. Latin America income declined primarily due to increased expenses associated
with new branches in Brazil, partly offset by strong growth in loans and deposits, up 46% and 7%, respectively. EMEA income increased, driven primarily by the absence of the 2005 third quarter $323 million after-tax change to standardize the
loan write-off policy, the absence of an $81 million loan loss reserve build in the 2005 second quarter, strong growth in customer deposits and investment product sales, and higher Germany asset sales. Partially offsetting the increased income were
higher expenses from increased business volumes and investment spending tied to retail bank branch expansion. Japan income declined due to lower deposits and higher expenses, mainly due to the consolidation and compliance activities related
to the shutdown of Japan Private Bank and the impact of foreign currency translation. Asia income increased, benefiting from higher deposit revenues and investment product sales and loan loss reserve releases in Korea and Australia; this was
partly offset by increased investment spending tied to retail bank branch expansion and the costs associated with the Korea labor settlement.
2005 vs. 2004
Net Interest Revenue increased, with improved deposit revenues in all regions; higher branch lending revenues in EMEA, Asia and Latin America; the
benefits of foreign currency translation; and the impact of the KorAm acquisition. Non-Interest Revenue increased primarily driven by higher investment revenues in all regions except Latin America; the impact of the KorAm acquisition,
the impact in Mexico of the 2005 second quarter gain related to Fobaproa and the 2005 third quarter value added tax refund; and the benefits of foreign currency translation. Average loans grew 15%, primarily in Asia, Mexico, and
Japan, while average deposits grew by 9%, primarily in Asia, Mexico, and EMEA. Assets under management increased by 17%.
Operating expenses increased due to the expansion of the distribution network in all regions except Japan, foreign currency translation, the impact of first quarter 2005 repositioning expenses of $70 million, and the impact of
the KorAm acquisition. This was partially offset by the VAT refund of $93 million in Mexico. Total branches grew by a net 131 during 2005, reflecting the opening of 183 new branches.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased as a sustained improvement in credit quality was more than offset by a $476
million pretax charge to standardize loan write-off policies in EMEA to the global write-off policy and a $127 million increase in the German credit reserves to reflect increased experience with the effects of bankruptcy law liberalization.
As a result, the consumer net credit loss ratio increased to 3.05% in 2005. The standardization of the loan write-off policies resulted in a significant drop in the 90 days past-due ratio, which fell to 1.29% in 2005, compared to 3.36% in 2004 and
4.61% in 2003.
Net income in 2005 also reflected a $61 million net tax benefit from the Homeland Investment Act.
Regional Net Income
Mexico income increased on strong
sales and customer balance growth, as well as the VAT refund of $79 million and tax benefits from the Homeland Investment Act. Latin America income declined, driven by repositioning expenses in 2005, and the impact of investment initiatives,
primarily in Brazil. EMEA income declined, driven by the impact of the write-off policy standardization, increases in credit loss reserves in Germany, and repositioning expenses reflected in the first quarter of 2005. Japan income
declined due primarily to expense growth associated with the consolidation and compliance activities related to the shutdown of the Japan Private Bank. Asia income increased, benefiting primarily from strongly improved revenues due to
increased business volumes, the impact of the KorAm acquisition, and benefits from foreign currency translation.
37
INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER OUTLOOK
Certain of the statements below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
International Consumer is diversified
across a number of geographies, product groups, and customer segments and monitors the economic situation in all of the countries in which it operates. In 2007, International Consumer will continue to invest to build on the competitive advantages of
its existing global network of branches, offices and sales professionals. The business expects earnings growth from expanding its customer base through organic growth, investments in expanding the branch network, and the benefit from strategic
investments and 2006 acquisitions, as well as the recently announced acquisition of Egg. The Egg acquisition when combined with the U.K. Consumer operations will create a broad-spectrum consumer financial services provider. These key variables are
expected to drive growth in loans, deposits and investment product sales. The businesses will also focus on tight expense control, productivity improvements and effective credit management. Revenues and credit costs will be affected by global
economic conditions, including the level of interest rates, the credit environment, unemployment rates, and political and regulatory developments around the world. International economies are expected to be stable, with an improvement in economic
activity expected in Western Europe and many Asian nations.
International Cards In 2007, continued investment in
customer acquisition in both new and existing markets is expected to drive increased purchase sales and loan volumes. Credit costs are expected to show some deterioration as the growing portfolio seasons, while the underlying credit environment is
forecast to remain stable.
International Consumer Finance In 2007, investment in new branches and sales
professionals will continue in key expansion markets. In Japan, the impact of the changes to consumer lending laws enacted in 2006 will continue to affect the operating environment. The repositioning of the Japan business is consistent
with the Companys efforts to establish a lower-cost platform and will enable it to compete more effectively in the new interest rate environment. The business expects to break even during 2007. Excluding Japan, organic growth in
existing branches, coupled with new branch openings, is expected to drive revenue and earnings growth. Offerings of new loan products and services in new markets will continue, and gains in market share across several key international regions are
forecast. The credit environment in Japan will be impacted by the changes enacted in 2006. Outside of Japan, credit costs are expected to increase slightly, in line with the growing portfolio.
International Retail Banking In 2007, the business will continue to invest in branch expansion and build on a strong presence in
several key
markets. The business is expected to generate revenue and earnings growth through an expanded base of customers, as well as increases in loan and deposit
balances and increased investment product sales. Credit costs are expected to deteriorate following the loan loss releases in 2006, and as the growing portfolio seasons, while the underlying credit environment is forecast to remain stable. During
2006, the business benefited from a higher level of APB 23 tax benefits, which are expected to be at lower levels in 2007.
Other Consumer
Other Consumer includes certain treasury and other unallocated staff functions and global marketing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
(211 |
) |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
(90 |
) |
|
$ |
(258 |
) |
|
$ |
556 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Income (loss) before tax benefits |
|
$ |
(673 |
) |
|
$ |
(607 |
) |
|
$ |
168 |
|
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(351 |
) |
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
$ |
97 |
|
2006 vs. 2005
Revenues and expenses reflect certain unallocated items that are not reported in the Global Consumer operating segments.
The net loss decrease was primarily due to the absence of the 2005 first quarter loss on the sale of a Manufactured Housing loan portfolio of $109 million after-tax, the 2006 first quarter tax benefit of $40 million on the resolution
of the Federal Tax Audit, and other tax benefits of $17 million, partially offset by SFAS 123(R) charges of $25 million after-tax and higher staff payments and legal costs.
2005 vs. 2004
Revenues and expenses reflect certain unallocated items that are not reported in the Global Consumer operating
segments.
The net income decline was primarily due to the absence of a $378 million after-tax gain related to the sale of Samba in
the 2004 second quarter, and the 2005 first quarter loss on the sale of a Manufactured Housing Loan portfolio of $109 million after-tax, partially offset by the absence of a $14 million after-tax write-down of assets in a non-core business in the
2004 fourth quarter and lower legal costs. Excluding the impact of the Samba gain, the decline in 2004 was primarily due to lower treasury results, including the impact of higher capital funding costs, the $14 million after-tax write-down of assets
in the 2004 fourth quarter, and higher staff-related, global marketing and legal costs.
38
CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANKING
Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) provides corporations, governments, institutions and investors in approximately 100
countries with a broad range of financial products and services. CIB includes Capital Markets and Banking, Transaction Services and Other CIB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
8,492 |
|
|
$ |
8,100 |
|
|
$ |
9,050 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
(10 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
18,695 |
|
|
|
15,763 |
|
|
|
12,736 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
24 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
27,187 |
|
|
$ |
23,863 |
|
|
$ |
21,786 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
17,119 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
20,530 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(975 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
96 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
9,709 |
|
|
$ |
9,772 |
|
|
$ |
2,231 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
(37 |
)% |
Net income |
|
$ |
7,127 |
|
|
$ |
6,895 |
|
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
NM |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
10,155 |
|
|
$ |
9,901 |
|
|
$ |
8,961 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
7 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
8,757 |
|
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
5 |
|
Japan |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
50 |
|
Asia |
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
8 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
27,187 |
|
|
$ |
23,863 |
|
|
$ |
21,786 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
$ |
2,950 |
|
|
$ |
(2,190 |
) |
|
(25 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Mexico |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
(32 |
)% |
Latin America |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Japan |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
49 |
|
Asia |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Total net income |
|
$ |
7,127 |
|
|
$ |
6,895 |
|
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
NM |
|
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
21,627 |
|
|
$ |
21,226 |
|
|
$ |
19,047 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
39
Capital Markets and Banking
Capital Markets and Banking offers a wide array of investment and commercial banking services and products, including
investment banking and advisory services, debt and equity trading, institutional brokerage, foreign exchange, structured products, derivatives, and lending. Capital Markets and Banking revenue is generated primarily from fees for investment
banking and advisory services, fees and spread on structured products, foreign exchange and derivatives, fees and interest on loans, and income earned on principal transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
5,483 |
|
|
$ |
5,804 |
|
|
$ |
7,314 |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
(21 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
15,735 |
|
|
|
13,166 |
|
|
|
9,792 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
34 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
21,218 |
|
|
$ |
18,970 |
|
|
$ |
17,106 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
13,136 |
|
|
|
11,501 |
|
|
|
9,959 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
92 |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
7,759 |
|
|
$ |
7,530 |
|
|
$ |
7,924 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
(5 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
(12 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
(35 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
5,763 |
|
|
$ |
5,327 |
|
|
$ |
5,395 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
(1 |
)% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
8,888 |
|
|
$ |
8,860 |
|
|
$ |
8,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
(1 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
1 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
4,393 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
16 |
|
Japan |
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
53 |
|
Asia |
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
1 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
21,218 |
|
|
$ |
18,970 |
|
|
$ |
17,106 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
2,176 |
|
|
$ |
2,422 |
|
|
$ |
2,502 |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
(3 |
)% |
Mexico |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(31 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(25 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
67 |
|
Japan |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
51 |
|
Asia |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Total net income |
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
$ |
5,327 |
|
|
$ |
5,395 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
(1 |
)% |
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
20,141 |
|
|
$ |
19,898 |
|
|
$ |
17,667 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue details: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory and other fees |
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
31 |
% |
Equity underwriting |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
3 |
|
Debt underwriting |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Revenue allocated to the Global Wealth Management Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity underwriting |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
16 |
|
|
2 |
|
Debt underwriting |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
(73 |
) |
|
(14 |
) |
Total investment banking revenue |
|
$ |
4,798 |
|
|
$ |
4,077 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
Lending |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
14 |
|
Equity markets |
|
|
3,892 |
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
33 |
|
Fixed income markets |
|
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
9,599 |
|
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
5 |
|
Other Capital Markets and Banking (2) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
69 |
|
Total Capital Markets and Banking Revenue (2) |
|
$ |
21,218 |
|
|
$ |
18,970 |
|
|
$ |
17,106 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
(2) |
Capital Markets and Banking revenues reflect Citigroups portion (49%) of the results of the Nikko Citigroup Joint Venture on each respective line with an offset in Other
Capital Markets and Banking to conform to the GAAP presentation. |
40
2006 vs. 2005
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased,
driven by broad-based growth across products, particularly in EMEA, Asia and Latin America. Fixed Income Markets revenue increases reflected growth in emerging markets trading, municipals, foreign exchange and credit products. Equity
Markets revenues increased, driven by strong growth globally, including cash trading, derivatives products and convertibles. Investment Banking revenue growth was driven by higher debt and equity underwriting revenues and increased advisory fees.
These gains were partially offset by a revenue decline in Lending, as improved credit conditions led to lower hedging results, the 2005 $386 million pretax gain on the sale of Nikko Cordial Shares and lower revenue in Commodities.
Operating expenses were impacted by $737 million of SFAS 123(R) charges and higher production-related incentive compensation, as well as a growth
in headcount and increased investment spending on strategic growth initiatives.
The provision for credit losses increased, driven by
a $372 million pretax charge to increase loan loss reserves, reflecting growth in loans and unfunded lending commitments and an update to historical data used for certain loss estimates.
Regional Net Income
Net income in the U.S. declined, primarily due to higher compensation expenses (the impact
from SFAS 123(R) charges) as well as lower revenues in Commodities and Lending, partially offset by higher Fixed Income and Equity Markets revenues and tax benefits from the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit and the New York Tax Audits.
Mexico net income was down, as growth in Fixed Income Markets revenues was offset by lower equity underwriting and lending revenues.
Lower net income also reflected the absence of a $39 million tax benefit from provisions of the Homeland Investment Act, as well as higher compensation expense and the absence of loan loss recoveries recorded in the prior-year period.
Latin America net income declined on an increase in credit costs due to the absence of loan loss recoveries recorded in the prior-year period,
higher investment spending, and the impact of SFAS 123(R) charges. These declines were partially offset by strong revenue growth in Equity and Fixed Income Markets in Brazil Investment Banking and by the tax benefits from the resolution of the
Federal Tax Audit.
EMEA net income increased on double-digit growth across all major product lines in the region from higher volumes
and growth in customer activity and tax benefits from the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit. The increase in net income was partially offset by higher compensation expense due to staff additions and the impact from SFAS 123(R) charges, and higher
credit costs on growth in loans and unfunded loan commitments.
Net income in Japan declined as strong growth in Fixed Income was
offset by a decrease in equities, the absence of a $248 million after-tax gain on the sale of Nikko Cordial shares in the 2005 fourth quarter, and higher expenses.
Net income in Asia increased, driven by broad-based double-digit growth across several products, including Fixed Income and Equity Markets and Advisory. Continued benign credit conditions and incremental tax
benefits from APB 23 in Australia, and globally the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit, further bolstered full-year results.
2005 vs. 2004
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased, driven by growth across all products. Equity Markets revenues increased, driven by growth in cash trading,
alternative execution and derivatives products. Fixed Income Markets revenue increases reflected growth in interest rate products, commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, and securitized markets. Investment Banking revenue growth was driven by
increased advisory fees on strong growth in completed M&A transactions and growth in equity underwriting. Lending revenue growth was mainly due to hedging gains in credit derivatives. Revenues also include a $386 million pretax gain on the sale
of Nikko Cordial shares.
Operating expenses increased due to higher incentive compensation, including repositioning costs of $212
million pretax (in the 2005 first quarter), increased investment spending on strategic growth initiatives, and the impact of the acquisitions of Knight and Lava Trading. Expenses included a $160 million pretax charge to increase reserves for
previously disclosed legal matters recorded in the 2005 fourth quarter.
The provision for credit losses increased, reflecting an
increase to loan loss reserves in 2005 and the absence of loan loss reserve releases recorded in the prior year. The provision for credit losses in 2005 included $289 million to increase loan loss reserves for increases in off-balance sheet
exposure, and a slight decline in credit quality.
Net income in the U.S. decreased primarily due to an increased provision
for credit losses.
The negative impact of a flat yield curve on revenues and the absence of loan loss reserve releases recorded in the
prior year caused a decline in Mexican net income.
Latin America net income decreased primarily due to the absence of loan loss
reserve releases recorded in 2004 and a decline in revenues from completed corporate finance transactions. Credit quality in Argentina and Brazil improved.
EMEA net income increased as a result of strong revenues across all businesses and lower credit provisions. Revenues increased in Fixed Income Markets, Equity Markets, Investment Banking, and Lending, on higher
volumes and growth in customer activity.
Net income in Japan increased due to strong growth in Equity Markets and Fixed Income
Markets revenues and a $248 million after-tax gain on the sale of Nikko Cordial shares recorded in the 2005 fourth quarter.
Net income in
Asia decreased primarily due to lower Fixed Income Markets revenues, mainly in global distressed debt trading and foreign exchange trading.
41
Transaction Services
Transaction Services is comprised of Cash Management, Trade Services and Securities & Fund Services (SFS). Cash
Management and Trade Services provide comprehensive cash management and trade finance for corporations and financial institutions worldwide. SFS provides custody and fund services to investors such as insurance companies and pension funds, clearing
services to intermediaries such as broker-dealers, and depository and agency/trust services to multi-national corporations and governments globally. Revenue is generated from fees for transaction processing, net interest revenue on Trade Services
loans and deposits in Cash Management and SFS, and fees on assets under custody in SFS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
2,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,745 |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
32 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
11 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
4,891 |
|
|
$ |
4,078 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
3,950 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
17 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
89 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,556 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
10 |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
(75 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,135 |
|
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
1,265 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
9 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
19 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
14 |
|
Japan |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
15 |
|
Asia |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
26 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
4,891 |
|
|
$ |
4,078 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
13 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
(36 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
(20 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
18 |
|
Japan |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
8 |
|
Asia |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
30 |
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
1,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,135 |
|
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
1,380 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
(4 |
)% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average deposits and other customer liability balances (in billions of dollars) |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
Assets under custody at year-end (in trillions of dollars) |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
Revenue details: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash management |
|
$ |
3,505 |
|
|
$ |
2,864 |
|
|
$ |
2,345 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
Securities and funds services |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
Trade services |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
Total revenue, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
4,891 |
|
|
$ |
4,078 |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
NM Not meaningful.
42
2006 vs. 2005
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased, reflecting
continued growth in customer liabilities and assets under custody. In addition, higher interest rates, increased volumes, and higher sales contributed to the growth.
Cash Managements revenue reflected growth across all regions, driven by higher liability balances, volumes and new sales. Higher interest rates also contributed to the revenue increase.
Securities & Funds Services experienced growth in revenues across all regions except Mexico. This was attributable to higher assets
under custody and volumes, increasing interest rates, and the impact of acquisitions. Assets under custody reached $10.4 trillion, an increase of $1.8 trillion, or 21%, on strong momentum from new business activities and improved equity markets, and
the inclusion of ABN AMRO and UNISEN assets under custody.
Trade Services and Finance revenues increased, principally driven by
growth in EMEA and the U.S. This was partially offset by the Latin America region.
Operating expenses increased
due to organic business growth, acquisitions, and investment spending.
The change in the provision for credit losses of $17 million
was primarily attributable to a reserve increase of $10 million in 2006 compared with 2005.
Regional Net Income
Net income in the U.S. declined, primarily due to continued investment spending, offset by growth in liability balances, and rising interest rates.
Mexico net income decreased primarily due to the absence of an $8 million tax benefit from provisions of the Homeland Investment
Act, as well as a $2 million VAT refund and higher expenses, offset by growth in liability balances and rising interest rates.
Latin
America net income increased primarily due to increased revenues from new sales, growth in liability balances, and rising interest rates.
EMEA net income increased primarily on increased revenue from new sales, growth in liability balances and assets under custody, rising interest rates and strong volumes. Asia net income increased primarily from increased revenue from new
sales, higher customer volumes, and growth in liability balances and assets under custody, and rising interest rates.
Japan net
income increased primarily due to increased revenue from new sales, growth in liability balances and assets under custody, and rising interest rates.
2005 vs. 2004
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased, reflecting growth in Cash Management and Global Securities Services. Average liability balances grew 20%,
primarily due to increases in Asia, EMEA and the U.S., reflecting positive flow from new and existing customers. Average liability balances reached $164 billion in the fourth quarter.
Cash Management revenue increased mainly due to growth in liability balances, improved spreads, and increased fees from new sales. Revenue growth
was at a double-digit rate across all regions.
Securities and Funds Services revenue increased, primarily reflecting growth in
Latin America, Asia and the U.S.; higher assets under custody and fees; and the impact of acquisitions. Assets under custody reached $8.6 trillion, an increase of $0.7 trillion, or 9%, on strong momentum from record sales, equity
markets, and the inclusion of ABN AMRO and UNISEN assets under custody. This was partially offset by a strengthened U.S. dollar and a slowdown in fixed income markets.
Trade Services revenue increased, due to growth in Asia and EMEA, partially offset by spread compression in Mexico and Latin America.
Operating expenses increased on higher business volumes, acquisitions, and investments in growth opportunities.
The change in the provision for credit losses was attributable to a reserve release of $163 million in 2004; this compared to reserve increases of
$18 million in 2005.
Net income in the U.S. increased, due to growth in liability balances, improved spreads, and an increase
in assets under custody, partially offset by higher expenses due to acquisitions and continued investment spending.
Mexico net
income decreased, due primarily to loan loss reserve releases in 2004. Adjusting for the reserve releases in 2004, net income momentum was strong.
Latin America net income decreased, due primarily to the impact of loan loss reserve releases in 2004.
EMEA net
income increased, mainly due to increases in liability balances and assets under custody, which drove strong revenues in Cash Management and Global Securities Services.
Asia net income rose in 2005, driven by new sales, increased fees from higher customer volumes, the impact of the KorAm acquisition, and growth in liability balances.
Japan net income increased, mainly due to increases in liability balances and assets under custody.
Cash-basis loans, which in the Transaction Services businesses are primarily trade finance receivables, were $81 million and $112 million at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease of $31 million in 2005 was primarily due to a decline in Brazil.
43
OTHER CIB
Other CIB includes offsets to certain line items reported in other CIB segments, certain non-recurring items and
tax amounts not allocated to CIB products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
7,725 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes (benefits) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
(7,123 |
) |
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
(2,725 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
(4,398 |
) |
2006 vs. 2005
Net income declined due to the absence of the 2005
fourth quarter WorldCom/Research litigation reserve release of $375 million after tax and the $120 million after tax insurance recovery in 2005 related to WorldCom and Enron legal matters.
2005 vs. 2004
Net income of $433 million in 2005, compared to a net loss of $4.398 billion in 2004, is primarily the result of the $4.95 billion after-tax WorldCom and
Litigation Reserve Charge recorded in 2004 and the release of WorldCom/ Research litigation reserves of $375 million after-tax in the 2005 fourth quarter. Results in 2004 included a $378 million after-tax gain on the sale of Samba recorded in
EMEA. Results in 2005 included a $120 million after-tax insurance recovery related to WorldCom and Enron legal matters recorded in the 2005 fourth quarter.
44
CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANKING OUTLOOK
Certain of the statements below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
CIB is significantly affected by the
levels of activity in the global capital markets, which are influenced by macro-economic and political developments, among other factors, in the approximately 100 countries in which the business operates. Global economic and market events can have
both positive and negative effects on the revenue and credit performance of the businesses.
As 2007 begins, the credit environment is
expected to remain stable; however, losses on corporate lending activities and the level of cash-basis loans can vary widely with respect to timing and amount, particularly within any narrowly defined business or loan type. In 2007, the business
expects to benefit from a higher level of APB 23 tax benefits than it realized in 2006.
In 2007, Capital Markets and Banking
initiatives will continue to focus on the delivery of financial solutions tailored to clients needs and the targeting of client segments with strong growth prospects. The business intends to leverage its position in certain products and client
relationships to increase its share of higher-margin structured products, for which
continued demand is expected. The business will continue its multi-year build-out of structured products capabilities in credit, commodities and currencies,
which should become a platform for future growth. We began to see a contribution to our growth in 2006 and expect a continued growth in revenues in 2007. Banking is expected to continue to see growth, particularly from the rapidly expanding Small
and Medium Enterprises (SME) business segment in the emerging markets and by expanding the successful National Corporate Bank model (an initiative to expand corporate banking customers to the next level downby sizeof clients) to other
countries. In parallel, leveraging the CIBs global network, client teams will seek to further strengthen client relationships and increase market share and revenues.
In 2007, Transaction Services will focus on generating organic revenue and earnings growth. The arising needs of emerging markets and of the worlds increasingly sophisticated capital markets will continue
to drive part of this growth. Management expects to sustain earnings growth by leveraging its global reach and economies of scale, which will help offset spread compression. Management will also focus on business opportunities in the U.S. by
broadening its footprint through domestic relationships.
45
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK]
46
GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Global Wealth Management is comprised of the Smith Barney Private Client businesses (including Citigroup Wealth Advisors
outside the U.S.), Citigroup Private Bank, and Citigroup Investment Research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
|
$ |
1,695 |
|
|
$ |
1,676 |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
6,989 |
|
|
|
6,853 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
2 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
10,177 |
|
|
$ |
8,684 |
|
|
$ |
8,529 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
2 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
6,666 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(17 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,959 |
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
8 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,444 |
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
3 |
% |
Revenues, net of interest expense by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
8,793 |
|
|
$ |
7,628 |
|
|
$ |
7,241 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
(11 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
1 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
NM |
|
Asia |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
2 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
10,177 |
|
|
$ |
8,684 |
|
|
$ |
8,529 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
2 |
% |
Net income (loss) by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
(3 |
)% |
Mexico |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
(15 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
(60 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
100 |
|
|
60 |
|
Asia |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Total net income |
|
$ |
1,444 |
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
3 |
% |
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
2,489 |
|
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
|
$ |
1,907 |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under fee-based management |
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
Total client assets |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
Net client asset flows |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
(52 |
)% |
|
(9 |
)% |
Financial advisors (FA) / bankers (actual number) |
|
|
13,694 |
|
|
|
13,916 |
|
|
|
12,728 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
9 |
% |
Annualized revenue per FA / banker (in thousands of dollars) |
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
Average deposits and other customer liability balances |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
(1 |
)% |
Average loans |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
NM Not meaningful.
47
Smith Barney
Smith Barney provides investment advice, financial planning and brokerage services to affluent individuals, companies,
and non-profits through a network of more than 13,000 Financial Advisors in more than 600 offices, primarily in the U.S. Smith Barney generates revenue from managing client assets, acting as a broker for clients in the purchase and sale of
securities, financing customers securities transactions and other borrowing needs through lending, and through the sale of mutual funds and alternative investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
$ |
606 |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
3 |
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
7,195 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
5 |
|
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
8,160 |
|
|
$ |
6,825 |
|
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
8 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
(4 |
)% |
Income taxes |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
(2 |
)% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
7,971 |
|
|
$ |
6,825 |
|
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
8,160 |
|
|
$ |
6,825 |
|
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
Net income by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
(2 |
)% |
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
(2 |
)% |
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
1,491 |
|
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
$ |
1,156 |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
(19 |
)% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under fee-based management |
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
24 |
% |
Total client assets |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
16 |
% |
Net client asset flows |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
(68 |
)% |
|
17 |
% |
Financial advisors (FA) (actual number) |
|
|
13,143 |
|
|
|
13,414 |
|
|
|
12,138 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
11 |
% |
Annualized revenue per FA (in thousands of dollars) |
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
Average deposits and other customer liability balances |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
2 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
48
2006 vs. 2005
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased primarily due
to a 32% increase in fee-based revenues, reflecting the continued shift toward offering fee-based advisory products and services. The launch of the Tiered-Pricing Program in September 2006 also drove revenue growth, along with strength in the
Managed Accounts, Mutual Fund and Annuity businesses. Transactional revenues increased 3% due to increased customer trading volumes. Results also reflected the acquisition of Legg Mason in December 2005.
Operating expenses increased primarily due to higher compensation expense, including $344 million of SFAS 123(R) costs, and integration costs of
the Legg Mason retail brokerage business.
Total assets under fee-based management were up from the prior-year period, driven by net client
asset flows and positive market action. Net flows were down compared to the prior year primarily on client attrition.
2005 vs. 2004
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased primarily due to a $459 million increase in asset-based revenue. Lower client trading volumes drove a decline in
transactional revenue, which decreased by $119 million.
Operating expenses increased, primarily due to higher production-related
compensation as a result of increased revenue. The increase also included repositioning charges of $28 million pretax in the 2005 first quarter, higher legal costs, and integration costs related to the acquisition of the Legg Mason retail brokerage
business.
Provision for loan loss increased, primarily reflecting the impact of growth in tailored loans.
On December 1, 2005, Smith Barney completed the acquisition of Legg Masons private client business, which added 124 branches,
approximately $100 billion of assets under management and more than 1,200 financial advisors, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern states. These branches and financial advisors were converted to Smith Barneys operating
platform during the 2006 first quarter.
Total assets under fee-based management increased, reflecting organic growth and the addition of
Legg Mason. Total client assets, including assets under fee-based management, increased primarily due to higher equity market values, the acquisition of Legg Mason and positive net flows of $28 billion.
Citigroup Investment Research
Citigroup Investment Research provides
independent client-focused research to individuals and institutions around the world. The majority of expense for this organization is charged to the Global Equities business in Capital Markets and Banking and to Smith Barney.
49
Private Bank
Private Bank provides personalized wealth management services for high-net-worth clients in 33 countries and territories.
These services include comprehensive investment management (investment funds management, capital markets solutions, trust, fiduciary and custody services), investment finance (credit services including real estate financing, commitments and letters
of credit) and banking services (deposit, checking and savings accounts, as well as cash management and other traditional banking services).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
957 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
2,017 |
|
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
2,044 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
(9 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
41 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
606 |
|
|
$ |
551 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
38 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
17 |
% |
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
$ |
803 |
|
|
$ |
756 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
(11 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
NM |
|
Asia |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
2 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
2,017 |
|
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
2,044 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
(9 |
)% |
Net income (loss) by region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
(6 |
)% |
Mexico |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
(15 |
) |
Latin America |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
(60 |
) |
EMEA |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
100 |
|
|
60 |
|
Asia |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Total net income |
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
17 |
% |
Average risk capital (1) |
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
56 |
% |
Return on risk capital (1) |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (1) |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under fee-based management |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
(8 |
)% |
Total client assets |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
(1 |
)% |
Net client asset flows |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
(88 |
)% |
Bankers (actual number) |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
(15 |
)% |
Annualized revenue per banker (in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
Average deposits and other customer liability balances |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
(4 |
)% |
Average loans |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
(1) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
NM Not meaningful.
50
2006 vs. 2005
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased due to strong
growth in Asia.
U.S. revenue increased, primarily driven by an increase in banking spreads and lending volumes, partially
offset by lending spread compression.
Mexico revenue increased, mainly due to an increase in banking and investment revenue,
partially offset by lower lending revenue.
Latin America revenue declined, primarily driven by lower spreads in the banking and
lending portfolios, partially offset by higher trust revenue.
EMEA revenue increased, driven by higher capital markets and
investments revenue.
Asia revenue increased, reflecting strong capital markets activity.
Operating expenses increased by $96 million as the absence of Japan expenses was offset by SFAS 123(R) charges, higher expenses due to
increased professional staffing and investment spending to expand on-shore markets. SFAS 123(R) charges in 2006 totaled $29 million.
Provision for loan losses was $24 million in 2006, as compared to $17 million in 2005. The provision in 2006 was primarily due to reserve builds of $28 million, partially offset by a $5 million recovery in Asia. 2005 includes
reserve builds of $24 million, offset by recoveries in Asia and EMEA of $9 million.
Client business volumes increased
$32 billion, or 14%. Growth was led by $14 billion in banking, primarily in EMEA and the U.S. Investment Finance volumes increased $4 billion, mainly driven by growth in the U.S. Custody assets grew by $6 billion,
primarily driven by U.S., EMEA and Asia. Managed assets increased by $8 billion due to increases in the U.S. and EMEA.
2005 vs. 2004
Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased due to the closure of the Japan Private Bank business. Revenue in Japan included losses of $82 million
from foreign exchange and interest rate hedges on anticipated client settlements for which reserves were established in the 2004 fourth quarter.
U.S. revenue increased, primarily driven by increased banking spreads and growth in lending volumes, combined with growth in fee income from discretionary and custody assets. Growth in the U.S. was negatively impacted by net
interest revenue compression.
Mexico revenue decreased as lower client transactional activity was partially offset by increased
banking volumes.
Latin America revenue decreased, primarily driven by lower client transactional activity, a decline in fee income
from discretionary and trust assets, and net interest revenue compression.
EMEA revenue increased, primarily driven by growth in fee
income from discretionary assets and growth in banking volumes.
Asia revenue increased, reflecting higher banking volumes and
increased fee income from discretionary, trust and custody assets.
Operating expenses decreased, primarily due to a $400 million
pretax exit plan charge in Japan recorded in the 2004 fourth quarter. Increased expenses in other regions reflected higher employee-related costs, including investments in front office sales and support.
Provision for loan losses included net recoveries in Asia and Europe, net write-offs in the U.S. and increases in the
allowance for loan losses. The allowance reflected an increase in Japan, and changes in the application of environmental factors for all regions. Net credit recoveries were (0.02%) of average loans outstanding in both 2005 and 2004.
Client business volumes increased $2 billion in 2005, as a decline of $14 billion in Japan was offset by growth of $16
billion, or 8%, in other regions. Growth was led by an increase of $3 billion in custody assets, which were higher in the U.S. and Latin America, offsetting the decline in Japan. Assets managed on a fee-basis were flat
due to the decline in Japan, offset predominantly by the impact of positive net flows in the U.S. Investment finance volumes were flat, reflecting the decline in Japan offset by growth in real-estate-secured loans in the
U.S. Banking and fiduciary deposits decreased $1 billion, with double-digit growth in Asia and Europe offset by the decline in Japan.
51
GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT OUTLOOK
Certain of the statements below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
Global Wealth Management is affected by
the levels of activity in the capital markets, which are influenced by macro-economic and political developments, among other factors. Global economic and market events can have both positive and negative effects on the revenue and credit
performance of the businesses.
Smith BarneyIn 2007, Smith Barney expects to see continued asset and revenue growth
resulting from the 2006 investments in its wealth management platform, as well as from the acquisition of the Quilter private client business from Morgan Stanley.
Investments are expected to continue in 2007 and will include additional initiatives intended to improve our client and Financial Advisor experience, significant resources allocated to Smith Barneys
partnership with the U.S. Consumer business, continued investment in the advisory platform, and continued increases in Financial Advisor hiring.
In Citigroup Investment Research, major initiatives include expanding client relationships, broadening research coverage in emerging markets, differentiating research product and service and continuing productivity improvements.
Private BankLeveraging Citigroups onshore and institutional capabilities, the Private Bank is building onshore
franchises focused on wealth-creating individuals in key markets such as the U.S., the U.K., India and Brazil.
In 2007, the Private Bank
expects growth in both annuity and transactional revenue across the product set, from investments to capital raising. In addition, investments in origination, product and onshore market build-outs are expected to have a positive impact on 2007 net
income growth.
52
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK]
53
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
Alternative Investments (AI) manages capital on behalf of Citigroup, as well as for third-party institutional and high-net-worth
investors. AI is an integrated alternative investment platform that manages a wide range of products across five asset classes, including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, structured products and managed futures. AIs business model is
to enable its 14 investment centers to retain the entrepreneurial qualities required to capitalize on evolving opportunities, while benefiting from the intellectual, operational and financial resources of Citigroup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
(12 |
)% |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Net realized and net change in unrealized gains |
|
$ |
2,107 |
|
|
$ |
2,582 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Fees, dividends and interest |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
89 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total proprietary investment activities revenues |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
3,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Client revenues (1) |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
25 |
% |
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
37 |
% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
$ |
2,151 |
|
|
$ |
2,799 |
|
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
87 |
% |
Revenue by product: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client (1) |
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
Private Equity |
|
$ |
1,743 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
94 |
% |
Hedge Funds |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Other |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
NM |
|
Proprietary |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
3,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
NM |
|
Average risk capital (2) |
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
|
$ |
4,264 |
|
|
$ |
3,669 |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
16 |
% |
Return on risk capital (2) |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (2) |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key indicators: (in billions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital under management: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client |
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
Proprietary |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
51 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
32 |
% |
(1) |
Includes fee income. Prior to 2005, revenue was reported net of profit sharing (profit sharing was reflected in the internal Citigroup distributors revenues). |
(2) |
See footnote 6 to the table on page 3. |
NM Not meaningful.
54
The Proprietary Portfolio of Alternative Investments consists of private equity, single- and multi-manager hedge funds, real estate and Legg Mason,
Inc. (Legg Mason) preferred shares. Private equity, which constitutes the largest proprietary investments on both a direct and indirect basis, is in the form of equity and mezzanine debt financing in companies across a broad range of industries
worldwide, including investments in developing economies. Such investments include Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, LP (CVC/Brazil, formerly CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, LP), which has invested primarily in companies privatized by
the government of Brazil in the mid-1990s.
The Client Portfolio is comprised of single- and multi-manager hedge funds, real estate,
managed futures, private equity, and a variety of leveraged fixed income products (credit structures). Products are distributed to investors directly by AI and through Citigroups Private Bank and Smith Barney businesses. Revenue
includes management and performance fees earned on the portfolio. Prior to 2005, the pretax profits from managing capital on behalf of Global Wealth Management clients were recorded in the respective Citigroup distributors income statement as
a component of revenues.
Investments held by investment company subsidiaries (including CVC/ Brazil) are carried at fair value, with the net change in unrealized gains and losses recorded in income. The Companys investment in CVC/Brazil is subject to a
variety of unresolved matters, including pending litigation involving some of its portfolio companies, which could affect future valuations of these companies.* Certain private equity investments in companies located in developing economies that are
not held in investment company subsidiaries are either carried at cost or accounted for by the equity method, with unrealized losses recognized in income for other-than-temporary declines in value. Investments classified as available-for-sale are
carried at fair value with the net change in unrealized gains and losses recorded in equity as Accumulated other comprehensive income. All other investment activities are primarily carried at fair value, with the net change in unrealized gains and
losses recorded in income.
The investment in Legg Mason resulted from the sale of Citigroups Asset Management business to Legg Mason,
Inc. on December 1, 2005, which included a combination of Legg Mason common and convertible preferred equity securities valued at $2.298 billion in the sale proceeds. Total equivalent number of common shares was 18.7 million, of which
10.3 million were sold in March 2006. The Legg Mason equity securities are classified on Citigroups Consolidated Balance Sheet as Investments (available-for-sale).
* |
This is a forward-looking statement within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
|
Legg Mason Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
Type of Ownership |
|
Shares owned on December 31, 2006 |
|
Sale Restriction |
|
Market Value as of December 31, 2006 ($ millions) |
|
Pretax Unrealized Gains (Losses) as of December 31, 2006 ($
millions) |
Legg Mason, Inc. |
|
Non-voting convertible preferred stock representing approximately 5.9% ownership |
|
8.4 shares (convertible into 8.4 million shares of common stock upon sale to non-affiliate) |
|
Subsequent to December 1, 2006, all 8.4 shares may be sold publicly at any time. |
|
$797 |
|
$(232) |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$797 |
|
$(232) |
55
2006 vs. 2005
Total proprietary revenues, net of interest expense, were
comprised of revenues from private equity of $1.7 billion, other investment activity of $484 million and hedge funds of $211 million. Private equity revenue declined $820 million from 2005, primarily driven by the absence of prior-year gains from
the sale of portfolio assets. Other investment activities revenue increased $26 million from 2005, largely due to realized gains from the liquidation of Citigroups investment in MetLife shares and real estate investment returns, partially
offset by lower realized gains from the sale of Citigroups investment in St. Paul shares. Hedge fund revenue increased $142 million, led by higher investment performance and an increased asset base. Client revenues increased $123 million,
reflecting increased management and performance fees from a 39% growth in average client capital under management.
Operating
expenses in 2006 increased from 2005, primarily due to higher employee-related expenses including the impact of SFAS 123(R).
Minority interest, net of taxes, declined on the absence of prior-year private equity gains related to underlying investments held by consolidated majority-owned legal entities. The impact of minority interest is reflected in fees,
dividends, and interest, and net realized and net change in unrealized gains/(losses) consistent with proceeds received by minority interests.
Proprietary capital under management declined $1.5 billion, primarily driven by the sale of Citigroups remaining holdings of St. Paul and MetLife shares and the partial sell-down of Legg Mason shares in the first quarter of
2006, which were partially offset by investments in private equity and hedge funds.
Client capital under management increased $13.1
billion due to inflows from institutional and high-net-worth clients in private equity, real estate and hedge funds.
2005 vs. 2004
Total proprietary revenues, net of interest expense, were comprised of revenues from private equity of $2.6 billion, other investment activity of $458 million and
hedge funds of $69 million. Private equity revenue increased $1.2 billion, primarily driven by gains realized through the sale of portfolio investments. Other investment activities revenue increased $364 million, due to realized gains from the sale
of a portion of Citigroups investment in St. Paul shares, while hedge fund revenue increased $57 million due to a higher net change in unrealized gains on a substantially increased asset base. Client revenues increased $67 million, reflecting
increased management fees from 25% growth in client capital under management.
Operating expenses increased due primarily to
increased performance-driven compensation and higher investment spending in hedge funds and real estate.
Minority interest, net of
tax, increased, primarily due to private equity gains related to underlying investments held by consolidated legal entities. The impact of minority interest is reflected in fees, dividends, and interest, and net realized gains/(losses)
consistent with cash proceeds received by minority interest.
Proprietary capital under management increased $4.1 billion, primarily
driven by the MetLife and Legg Mason shares acquired during 2005, as well as the funding of proprietary investments in hedge funds and real estate, partially offset by the sale of a portion of Citigroups holdings of St. Paul shares.
Client capital under management increased $5.0 billion due to inflows from institutional and high-net-worth clients, and the
inclusion of $1.4 billion in assets for the former Travelers Life & Annuities business, following the July 1, 2005 sale to MetLife.
56
CORPORATE/OTHER
Corporate/Other includes net treasury results,
unallocated corporate expenses, offsets to certain line-item reclassifications reported in the business segments (intersegment eliminations), the results of discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of accounting change and unallocated taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
(486 |
) |
|
$ |
( 342 |
) |
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
(949 |
) |
|
$ |
(580 |
) |
|
$ |
( 270 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
(1,155 |
) |
|
$ |
(961 |
) |
|
$ |
(243 |
) |
Income tax benefits |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
(654 |
) |
|
$ |
(667 |
) |
|
$ |
48 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
|
$ |
4,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
2006 vs. 2005
Revenues, net of interest expense, declined primarily due to lower intersegment eliminations.
Operating expenses
declined, primarily due to lower intersegment eliminations, partially offset by increased staffing and technology costs.
Income tax
benefits increased due to a higher pretax loss in the current year, a tax reserve release of $61 million relating to the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit and a release of $8 million relating to the resolution of the New York Tax Audits.
Discontinued operations represent the operations in the Companys Sale of the Asset Management Business and the Sale of the Life
Insurance and Annuities Business. For 2006, income from discontinued operations included gains and tax benefits relating to the final settlement of the Life Insurance and Annuities and Asset Management Sale Transactions and a gain from the Sale of
the Asset Management Business in Poland. Tax benefits included a tax reserve release of $59 million relating to the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit and a tax benefit of $17 million related to the resolution of the New York Tax Audits. See Note 3
to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118.
2005 vs. 2004
Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased, primarily due to the absence of the prior-year gain on the sale of EFS and lower treasury results, partially offset
by higher intersegment eliminations. Higher short-term interest rates, partially offset by lower funding balances, drove a decline in treasury results.
Operating expenses increased, primarily due to higher intersegment eliminations and unallocated employee-related costs, increased staffing and technology costs, and increased Citigroup Foundation contributions.
These were partially offset by a reserve release associated with the shutdown of the Private Bank in Japan.
Income tax benefits
increased, due to the higher pretax loss in 2005, offset by the $147 million tax reserve release due to the closing of a tax audit in 2004.
Discontinued operations represent the operations in the Companys Sale of the Asset Management Business to Legg Mason, Inc., and the Sale of the Life Insurance and Annuities Business. For 2005, income from discontinued operations
included a $2.082 billion, after-tax gain from the Sale of the Asset Management Business, as well as a $2.120 billion, after-tax gain from the Sale of the Life Insurance and Annuities Business. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 118.
57
RISK FACTORS
The following discussion sets forth certain risks that the Company believes could cause its actual future results to differ materially from expected results.
Economic conditions. The
profitability of Citigroups businesses may be affected by global and local economic conditions, such as the liquidity of the global financial markets, the level and volatility of interest rates and equity prices, investor sentiment, inflation,
and the availability and cost of credit.
The Company generally maintains large trading portfolios in the fixed income, currency, commodity
and equity markets and has significant investment positions, including investments held by its private equity business. The revenues derived from these portfolios are directly affected by economic conditions.
The credit quality of Citigroups on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures is also affected by economic conditions, as more loan
delinquencies would likely result in a higher level of charge-offs and increased provisions for credit losses, adversely affecting the Companys earnings. The Companys consumer businesses are particularly affected by factors such as
prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, changes in consumer spending and the number of personal bankruptcies.
Credit, market and liquidity risk. As discussed above, the Companys earnings may be impacted through its
market risk and credit risk positions and by changes in economic conditions. In addition, Citigroups earnings are dependent upon the extent to which management can successfully manage its positions within the global markets. In particular
environments, the Company may not be able to mitigate its risk exposures as effectively as desired, and may have unwanted exposures to certain risk factors.
The Companys earnings are also dependent upon its ability to properly value financial instruments. In certain illiquid markets, judgmental estimates of value may be required. The Companys earnings are also
dependent upon how effectively it assesses the cost of credit and manages its portfolio of risk concentrations. In addition to the direct impact of the successful management of these risk factors, management effectiveness is taken into consideration
by the rating agencies, which determine the Companys own credit ratings and thereby affect the Companys cost of funds.
Competition. Merger activity in the financial services industry has produced companies that are capable of offering a wide array of
financial products and services at competitive prices. Globalization of the capital markets and financial services industries exposes Citigroup to competition both at the global and local level. In addition, technological advances and the growth of
e-commerce have made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally were banking products. Citigroups ability to grow its businesses, and therefore its earnings, is affected by these competitive
pressures.
Country risk.
Citigroups international revenues are subject to risk of loss from unfavorable political and diplomatic developments, currency fluctuations, social instability, and changes in governmental policies, including expropriation, nationalization,
international ownership legislation, interest rate caps and tax policies. In addition, revenues from the trading of international securities and investment in international securities may be subject to negative fluctuations as a result of the above
factors. The impact of these fluctuations could be accentuated because certain international trading markets, particularly those in emerging market
countries, are typically smaller, less liquid and more volatile than U.S. trading markets.
For geographic distributions of net income, see page 17. For a discussion of international loans, see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 136 and Country and Cross-Border Risk Management Process on page 76.
Operational risk. Citigroup is exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of fraud by employees and outsiders, clerical and record-keeping errors, and
computer/telecommunications systems malfunctions. Given the high volume of transactions at Citigroup, certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and rectified. In addition, the Companys necessary dependence upon
automated systems to record and process its transaction volume may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. The Company may also
be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, epidemics, computer viruses, and electrical/ telecommunications outages),
which may give rise to losses in service to customers and/or monetary loss to the Company. All of these risks are also applicable where the Company relies on outside vendors to provide services to it and its customers.
U.S. fiscal policies. The Companys businesses
and earnings are affected by the fiscal policies adopted by regulatory authorities of the United States. For example, in the United States, policies of the Federal Reserve Board directly influence the rate of interest paid by commercial banks on
their interest-bearing deposits and also may affect the value of financial instruments held by the Company. In addition, such changes in fiscal policy may affect the credit quality of the Companys customers. The actions of the Federal Reserve
Board directly impact the Companys cost of funds for lending, capital raising and investment activities.
Reputational and legal risk. Various issues may give rise to reputational risk and cause harm to the Company and its business prospects. These issues include appropriately
dealing with potential conflicts of interest; legal and regulatory requirements; ethical issues; money laundering laws; privacy laws; information security policies; sales and trading practices; and conduct by companies in which we hold strategic
investments or joint venture partners. Failure to address these issues appropriately could also give rise to additional legal risk to the Company, which could increase the number of litigation claims and the amount of damages asserted against the
Company, or subject the Company to regulatory enforcement actions, fines and penalties.
Certain regulatory considerations. As a worldwide business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation, new legislation and changing accounting standards and
interpretations thereof. Legislation is introduced, including tax consumer protection, privacy and other legislation, from time to time in Congress, in the states and in foreign jurisdictions that may change banking and financial services laws and
the operating environment of the Company and its subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The Company cannot determine whether such legislation will be enacted and the ultimate effect that would have on the Companys results.
58
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK
Citigroups risk management framework
balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions within each business.
The Citigroup Senior Risk
Officer is responsible for:
|
|
establishing standards for the measurement and reporting of risk, |
|
|
managing and compensating the senior independent risk managers at the business level, |
|
|
approving business-level risk management policies, and |
|
|
reviewing major risk exposures and concentrations across the organization. |
The independent risk managers at the business level are responsible for establishing and implementing risk management policies and practices within their
business, for overseeing the risk in their business, and for responding to the needs and issues of their business.
RISK CAPITAL
Risk capital is defined as the amount of capital required to absorb potential unexpected economic losses
resulting from extremely severe events over a one-year time period.
|
|
Economic losses include losses that appear on the income statement and fair value adjustments to the financial statements, as well as any further
declines in value not captured on the income statement. |
|
|
Unexpected losses are the difference between potential extremely severe losses and Citigroups expected (average) loss over a one-year time period.
|
|
|
Extremely severe is defined as potential loss at a 99.97% confidence level, based on the distribution of observed events and scenario analysis.
|
Risk capital is used in the calculation of return on risk capital (RORC) and return on invested capital (ROIC).
RORC, calculated as annualized income from continuing operations divided by average risk capital, compares business income with the capital
required to absorb the risks. It is used to assess businesses operating performance and to determine incremental allocation of capital for organic growth.
ROIC is calculated using income adjusted to exclude a net internal funding cost Citigroup levies on the goodwill and intangible assets of each business. This adjusted annualized income is divided by the sum of each
businesss average risk capital, goodwill and intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights, which are captured in risk capital). ROIC thus compares business income with the total invested capitalrisk capital, goodwill and
intangible assetsused to generate that income. ROIC is used to assess returns on potential acquisitions and divestitures, and to compare long-term performance of businesses with differing proportions of organic and acquired growth.
The drivers of
economic losses are risks, which can be broadly categorized as credit risk (including cross-border risk), market risk and operational risk:
|
|
Credit risk losses primarily result from a borrowers or counterpartys inability to meet its obligations. |
|
|
Market risk losses arise from fluctuations in the market value of trading and non-trading positions, including changes in value resulting from fluctuations in
rates. |
|
|
Operational risk losses result from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems or from external events. |
These risks are measured and aggregated within businesses and across Citigroup to facilitate the understanding of the Companys exposure to extreme
downside events.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, risk capital for Citigroup was comprised of the following risk types:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
Dec. 31, 2006 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
Credit risk |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
Market risk |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Operational risk |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Intersector diversification (1) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Total Citigroup |
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
|
$ |
53.2 |
|
Return on risk capital |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Return on invested capital |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
(1) |
Reduction in risk from diversification between sectors. |
The increase in Citigroups risk capital from December 31, 2005 was primarily driven by portfolio growth, particularly in U.S. Consumer Lending and CIB, as well as the year-end methodology update. Average risk capital,
return on risk capital and return on invested capital are provided for each segment and product and are disclosed on pages 4074. The increase in average risk capital in 2006 was driven by increases across Citigroup businesses. The $700
million, or 39%, increase in U.S. Commercial Business and the $650 million, or 22%, increase in U.S. Retail Distribution were driven by refinements in risk capital methodologies. The $1.5 billion, or 46%, increase in U.S. Consumer
Lending was primarily due to portfolio growth and refinements in risk capital methodologies. The $350 million, or 17%, increase in International Cards was primarily due to portfolio growth. The $250 million, or 29%, increase in
International Consumer Finance and the $650 million, or 67%, increase in Smith Barney were primarily due to refinements in the risk capital methodologies.
59
Citigroup updates risk capital methodologies in the first quarter of each year. For 2007, Citigroup will be updating the methodologies for market risk for
proprietary investments, the implementation of SFAS 158 and operational risk. To evaluate the impact of the refinements, risk capital as of year-end is calculated under both existing and revised methodologies. Measured under the revised
methodologies, the total risk capital as of December 31, 2006 is $63.1 billion, $3.3 billion, or 5%, higher than the $59.8 billion reported under the legacy methodology. RORC and ROIC for the 2007 first quarter will be measured using average
risk capital based on the revised methodologies.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Credit risk is the potential for financial loss resulting from the failure of a borrower or
counterparty to honor its financial or contractual obligations. Credit risk arises in many of the Companys business activities, including:
|
|
securities transactions |
|
|
when the Company acts as an intermediary on behalf of its clients and other third parties. |
60
LOANS OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
$ |
225,944 |
|
|
$ |
192,108 |
|
|
$ |
161,832 |
|
|
$ |
129,507 |
|
|
$ |
121,178 |
|
Installment, revolving credit, and other |
|
|
131,399 |
|
|
|
127,789 |
|
|
|
134,784 |
|
|
|
136,725 |
|
|
|
113,620 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
|
|
12,027 |
|
|
|
$ |
362,086 |
|
|
$ |
324,992 |
|
|
$ |
302,646 |
|
|
$ |
274,755 |
|
|
$ |
246,825 |
|
In offices outside the U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
$ |
44,457 |
|
|
$ |
39,619 |
|
|
$ |
39,601 |
|
|
$ |
28,743 |
|
|
$ |
26,564 |
|
Installment, revolving credit, and other (1) |
|
|
105,393 |
|
|
|
89,559 |
|
|
|
92,647 |
|
|
|
76,037 |
|
|
|
64,817 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
$ |
150,810 |
|
|
$ |
130,044 |
|
|
$ |
133,867 |
|
|
$ |
106,996 |
|
|
$ |
93,504 |
|
|
|
$ |
512,896 |
|
|
$ |
455,036 |
|
|
$ |
436,513 |
|
|
$ |
381,751 |
|
|
$ |
340,329 |
|
Unearned income (1) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(1,819 |
) |
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
Consumer loansnet |
|
$ |
512,921 |
|
|
$ |
454,620 |
|
|
$ |
435,226 |
|
|
$ |
379,932 |
|
|
$ |
337,681 |
|
Corporate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
27,437 |
|
|
$ |
22,081 |
|
|
$ |
14,437 |
|
|
$ |
15,207 |
|
|
$ |
22,041 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
$ |
29,706 |
|
|
$ |
24,062 |
|
|
$ |
16,416 |
|
|
$ |
17,312 |
|
|
$ |
26,631 |
|
In offices outside the U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
105,872 |
|
|
$ |
80,116 |
|
|
$ |
77,052 |
|
|
$ |
62,884 |
|
|
$ |
67,456 |
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
5,206 |
|
|
|
3,928 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
Loans to financial institutions |
|
|
21,827 |
|
|
|
16,889 |
|
|
|
12,921 |
|
|
|
12,063 |
|
|
|
8,583 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
Governments and official institutions |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
$ |
136,914 |
|
|
$ |
105,175 |
|
|
$ |
97,486 |
|
|
$ |
81,053 |
|
|
$ |
83,789 |
|
|
|
$ |
166,620 |
|
|
$ |
129,237 |
|
|
$ |
113,902 |
|
|
$ |
98,365 |
|
|
$ |
110,420 |
|
Unearned income |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
Corporate loansnet |
|
$ |
166,271 |
|
|
$ |
128,883 |
|
|
$ |
113,603 |
|
|
$ |
98,074 |
|
|
$ |
110,124 |
|
Total loansnet of unearned income |
|
$ |
679,192 |
|
|
$ |
583,503 |
|
|
$ |
548,829 |
|
|
$ |
478,006 |
|
|
$ |
447,805 |
|
Allowance for loan losseson drawn exposures |
|
|
(8,940 |
) |
|
|
(9,782 |
) |
|
|
(11,269 |
) |
|
|
(12,643 |
) |
|
|
(11,101 |
) |
Total loansnet of unearned income and allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
670,252 |
|
|
$ |
573,721 |
|
|
$ |
537,560 |
|
|
$ |
465,363 |
|
|
$ |
436,704 |
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loansnet of unearned income |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to current years presentation. |
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND OTHER REPOSSESSED ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Other real estate owned (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
$ |
385 |
|
$ |
279 |
|
$ |
320 |
|
$ |
437 |
|
$ |
495 |
Corporate |
|
|
316 |
|
|
150 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
75 |
Total other real estate owned |
|
$ |
701 |
|
$ |
429 |
|
$ |
446 |
|
$ |
542 |
|
$ |
570 |
Other repossessed assets (2) |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
151 |
|
$ |
230 |
(1) |
Represents repossessed real estate, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell. |
(2) |
Primarily commercial transportation equipment and manufactured housing, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell. |
61
DETAILS OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of year |
|
$ |
9,782 |
|
|
$ |
11,269 |
|
|
$ |
12,643 |
|
|
$ |
11,101 |
|
|
$ |
9,688 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
$ |
6,636 |
|
|
$ |
8,224 |
|
|
$ |
7,205 |
|
|
$ |
7,316 |
|
|
$ |
7,714 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(972 |
) |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,738 |
|
|
$ |
7,929 |
|
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
|
$ |
8,046 |
|
|
$ |
9,995 |
|
Gross credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
$ |
5,922 |
|
|
$ |
6,937 |
|
|
$ |
5,783 |
|
|
$ |
5,826 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
4,717 |
|
|
|
4,664 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Governments and official institutions outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,541 |
|
|
$ |
10,961 |
|
|
$ |
10,873 |
|
|
$ |
10,526 |
|
|
$ |
10,566 |
|
Credit recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
691 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
1,079 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Corporate (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Governments and official institutions outside the U.S. |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Loans to financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,272 |
|
|
$ |
1,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
Net credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
$ |
4,835 |
|
|
$ |
5,804 |
|
|
$ |
5,369 |
|
|
$ |
5,779 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
3,571 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
3,397 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,344 |
|
|
$ |
8,406 |
|
|
$ |
8,601 |
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
|
$ |
9,003 |
|
Othernet (3) |
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
2,262 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of year |
|
$ |
8,940 |
|
|
$ |
9,782 |
|
|
$ |
11,269 |
|
|
$ |
12,643 |
|
|
$ |
11,101 |
|
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments (4) |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
Total allowance for loans, leases and unfunded lending commitments |
|
$ |
10,040 |
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
$ |
11,869 |
|
|
$ |
13,243 |
|
|
$ |
11,668 |
|
Net consumer credit losses |
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
|
$ |
8,683 |
|
|
$ |
8,471 |
|
|
$ |
7,555 |
|
|
$ |
7,452 |
|
As a percentage of average consumer loans |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
2.55 |
% |
Net corporate credit losses/(recoveries) |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,551 |
|
As a percentage of average corporate loans |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
(1) |
Consumer credit losses and recoveries primarily relate to revolving credit and installment loans. |
(2) |
Amounts in 2003 and 2002 include $12 million (through the 2003 third quarter) and $114 million, respectively, of collections from credit default swaps purchased from third parties. From the
2003 fourth quarter forward, collections from credit default swaps are included within Principal Transactions on the Consolidated Statement of Income. |
(3) |
2006 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $429 million related to securitizations and portfolio sales and the addition of $84 million related to the acquisition of the
CrediCard portfolio. 2005 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $584 million related to securitizations and portfolio sales, a reduction of $110 million related to purchase accounting adjustments from the KorAm acquisition, and a
reduction of $90 million from the sale of CitiCapitals transportation portfolio. 2004 primarily includes the addition of $715 million of loan loss reserves related to the acquisition of KorAm and the addition of $148 million of loan loss
reserves related to the acquisition of WMF. 2003 primarily includes the addition of $2.1 billion of loan loss reserves related to the acquisition of the Sears credit card business. 2002 primarily includes the addition of $452 million of loan loss
reserves related to the acquisition of Golden State Bancorp (GSB). |
(4) |
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded with Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
NM Not meaningful.
62
CASH-BASIS, RENEGOTIATED, AND PAST DUE LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Corporate cash-basis loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral dependent (at lower of cost or collateral value) (2) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
64 |
Other |
|
|
516 |
|
|
998 |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
3,931 |
Total |
|
$ |
535 |
|
$ |
1,004 |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
$ |
3,419 |
|
$ |
3,995 |
Corporate cash-basis loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
$ |
254 |
|
$ |
640 |
|
$ |
887 |
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
407 |
|
|
923 |
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
3,108 |
Total |
|
$ |
535 |
|
$ |
1,004 |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
$ |
3,419 |
|
$ |
3,995 |
Renegotiated loans (includes Corporate and Commercial Business Loans) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
107 |
|
$ |
115 |
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
18 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
55 |
Total |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
83 |
|
$ |
140 |
|
$ |
170 |
Consumer loans on which accrual of interest had been suspended (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
2,490 |
|
$ |
2,307 |
|
$ |
2,485 |
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
$ |
3,114 |
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
2,792 |
Total |
|
$ |
4,512 |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
5,463 |
|
$ |
6,085 |
|
$ |
5,906 |
Accruing loans 90 or more days delinquent (4) (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
$ |
2,886 |
|
$ |
3,153 |
|
$ |
3,298 |
|
$ |
2,639 |
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
524 |
|
|
391 |
|
|
401 |
|
|
576 |
|
|
447 |
Total |
|
$ |
2,784 |
|
$ |
3,277 |
|
$ |
3,554 |
|
$ |
3,874 |
|
$ |
3,086 |
(1) |
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are accreting interest in accordance with Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans on Debt Securities Acquired in a
Transfer (SOP 03-3). Prior to 2004, these loans were classified with other assets. The carrying value of these loans was $949 million at December 31, 2006, $1,120 million at December 31, 2005 and $1,213 million at December 31,
2004. Prior to 2004, the balances were immaterial. |
(2) |
A cash-basis loan is defined as collateral dependent when repayment is expected to be provided solely by the liquidation of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and
reliable sources of repayment, in which case the loans are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. |
(3) |
From December 31, 2005 forward, balance includes the impact of the change in the EMEA Consumer Write-Off Policy. |
(4) |
The December 31, 2004 balance includes the PRMI data. The December 31, 2003 balance includes the Sears and Home Depot data. The December 31, 2002 balance includes GSB data.
|
(5) |
Substantially comprised of consumer loans of which $1.436 billion, $1.591 billion, $1.867 billion, $1.643 billion, and $1.764 billion are government-guaranteed student loans and Federal
Housing Authority mortgages at December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. |
FOREGONE INTEREST REVENUE ON LOANS (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
In U.S. offices |
|
In non-U.S. offices |
|
2006 total |
Interest revenue that would have been accrued at original contractual rates (2) |
|
$ |
253 |
|
$ |
415 |
|
$ |
668 |
Amount recognized as interest revenue (2) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
168 |
|
|
205 |
Foregone interest revenue |
|
$ |
216 |
|
$ |
247 |
|
$ |
463 |
(1) |
Relates to corporate cash-basis, renegotiated loans and consumer loans on which accrual of interest had been suspended. |
(2) |
Interest revenue in offices outside the U.S. may reflect prevailing local interest rates, including the effects of inflation and monetary correction in certain countries.
|
63
CONSUMER CREDIT RISK
Within Global Consumer, independent credit risk management is responsible for establishing the Global
Consumer Credit Policy, approving business-specific policies and procedures, monitoring business risk management performance, providing ongoing assessment of portfolio credit risk, and approving new products and new risks.
Approval policies for a product or business are tailored to internal audit ratings, profitability, and credit risk portfolio performance.
CONSUMER PORTFOLIO REVIEW
Citigroups consumer loan portfolio is well diversified by both product and location.
In the Consumer portfolio, credit loss experience is often expressed in terms of annualized net credit losses as a percentage of average loans. Consumer loans are generally written off no later than a predetermined number of days past due
on a contractual basis, or earlier in the event of bankruptcy.
U.S. Commercial Business includes loans and leases made principally
to small- and middle-market businesses. These are placed on a non-accrual basis when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is past due for 90 days or more, except when the loan is well secured and in the process of collection.
The following table summarizes delinquency and net credit loss experience in both the managed and on-balance sheet consumer loan
portfolios. The managed loan portfolio includes held-for-sale and securitized credit card receivables. Only U.S. Cards from a product view and U.S. from a regional view are impacted. Although a managed basis presentation is not in
conformity with GAAP, the Company believes managed credit statistics provide a representation of performance and key indicators of the credit card business that is consistent with the way management reviews operating performance and allocates
resources. For example, the U.S. Cards business considers both on-balance sheet and securitized balances (together, its managed portfolio) when determining capital allocation and general management decisions and compensation. Furthermore,
investors use information about the credit quality of the entire managed portfolio, as the results of both the on-balance sheet and securitized portfolios impact the overall performance of the U.S. Cards business. For a further discussion of
managed-basis reporting, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143.
64
Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts, Net Credit
Losses, and Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars, except total and average loan amounts in billions |
|
Total loans |
|
90 days or more past due (1) |
|
|
Average loans |
|
Net credit losses (1) |
|
Product View: |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Cards |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
$ |
1,788 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
3,526 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
5.83 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
U.S. Retail Distribution |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
2.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
U.S. Consumer Lending |
|
|
211.4 |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
U.S. Commercial Business |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Cards |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
1.95 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
4.84 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.33 |
% |
International Consumer Finance |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
5.92 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.36 |
% |
International Retail Banking |
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Private Bank (2) |
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
)% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
Other Consumer Loans |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
On-Balance Sheet Loans (3) |
|
$ |
510.8 |
|
$ |
6,576 |
|
|
$ |
6,574 |
|
|
$ |
8,213 |
|
|
$ |
477.4 |
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
|
$ |
8,683 |
|
|
$ |
8,471 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
Securitized receivables (all in U.S. Cards) |
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
96.4 |
|
$ |
3,985 |
|
|
$ |
5,326 |
|
|
$ |
4,865 |
|
Credit card receivables held-for-sale (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Managed Loans (5) |
|
$ |
610.3 |
|
$ |
8,192 |
|
|
$ |
7,888 |
|
|
$ |
9,541 |
|
|
$ |
574.1 |
|
$ |
11,252 |
|
|
$ |
14,037 |
|
|
$ |
13,550 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
Regional View: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
370.9 |
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
4,857 |
|
|
$ |
5,216 |
|
|
$ |
348.4 |
|
$ |
3,820 |
|
|
$ |
4,860 |
|
|
$ |
5,862 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
4.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
Japan |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
8.83 |
% |
|
|
7.43 |
% |
|
|
7.22 |
% |
Asia |
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
(0.38 |
)% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
On-Balance Sheet Loans (3) |
|
$ |
510.8 |
|
$ |
6,576 |
|
|
$ |
6,574 |
|
|
$ |
8,213 |
|
|
$ |
477.4 |
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
|
$ |
8,683 |
|
|
$ |
8,471 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
Securitized receivables (all in U.S. Cards) |
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
96.4 |
|
$ |
3,985 |
|
|
$ |
5,326 |
|
|
$ |
4,865 |
|
Credit card receivables held-for-sale (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Managed Loans (5) |
|
$ |
610.3 |
|
$ |
8,192 |
|
|
$ |
7,888 |
|
|
$ |
9,541 |
|
|
$ |
574.1 |
|
$ |
11,252 |
|
|
$ |
14,037 |
|
|
$ |
13,550 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
(1) |
The ratios of 90 days or more past due and net credit losses are calculated based on end-of-period and average loans, respectively, both net of unearned income. |
(2) |
Private Bank results are reported as part of the Global Wealth Management segment. |
(3) |
Total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $2 billion and $3 billion, respectively, which are included in Consumer Loans on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(4) |
Included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(5) |
This table presents credit information on a held basis and shows the impact of securitizations to reconcile to a managed basis. Only U.S. Cards from a product view, and U.S.
from a regional view, are affected. Managed-basis reporting is a non-GAAP measure. Held-basis reporting is the related GAAP measure. See a discussion of managed-basis reporting on page 64. |
65
Consumer Loan Balances, Net of Unearned Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
Average |
In billions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
On-balance sheet (1) |
|
$ |
510.8 |
|
$ |
450.6 |
|
$ |
430.7 |
|
$ |
477.4 |
|
$ |
432.8 |
|
$ |
396.9 |
Securitized receivables (all in U.S. Cards) |
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
77.9 |
Credit card receivables held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
3.1 |
Total managed (3) |
|
$ |
610.3 |
|
$ |
546.8 |
|
$ |
518.5 |
|
$ |
574.1 |
|
$ |
522.4 |
|
$ |
477.9 |
(1) |
Total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $2 billion and $3 billion, respectively for 2006, and $4 billion and $4 billion,
respectively for 2005 and 2004, which are included in Consumer Loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(2) |
Included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(3) |
This table presents loan information on a held basis and shows the impact of securitization to reconcile to a managed basis. Managed-basis reporting is a non-GAAP measure. Held-basis
reporting is the related GAAP measure. See a discussion of managed-basis reporting on page 64. |
Citigroups total allowance for loans,
leases and unfunded lending commitments of $10.040 billion is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire portfolio. For analytical purposes only, the portion of Citigroups allowance for credit losses attributed to the
Consumer portfolio was $6.006 billion at December 31, 2006, $6.922 billion at December 31, 2005 and $8.379 billion at December 31, 2004. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses from December 31, 2005 of $916 million
included:
|
|
reserve releases, primarily related to a decline in bankruptcy filings due to the impact of the change in bankruptcy legislation on U.S. Cards in 2005, and
stable credit conditions in the U.S. and internationally; |
|
|
$429 million of reductions related to securitizations and sales of portfolios in the U.S. Cards business; |
|
|
a $200 million release related to Hurricane Katrina. |
Offsetting these reductions in the allowance for credit losses was the impact of reserve builds of $660 million, primarily related to increased reserves in Mexico; increased reserves in Asia, primarily
related to industry-wide credit conditions in the Taiwan cards market; and increased reserves in Japan primarily related to the change in the operating environment in the consumer finance business, and the passage on December 13, 2006,
of changes to Japans consumer lending laws. The acquisition of the CrediCard portfolio increased the allowance for credit losses by $84 million in Latin America.
On-balance sheet consumer loans of $510.8
billion increased $60.2 billion, or 13%, from December 31, 2005, primarily driven by growth in mortgage and other real-estate-secured loans in the U.S. Consumer Lending, U.S. Commercial Business, and Private Bank businesses
and growth in U.S. Retail Distribution. Credit card receivables declined on higher payment rates by customers.
Net credit losses,
delinquencies and the related ratios are affected by the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, unemployment, global economic conditions, portfolio growth and seasonal factors, as well as macro-economic and regulatory
policies.
Consumer Credit Outlook
Consumer credit losses in 2007
are expected to moderately deteriorate from prior-year levels due to the following:
|
|
Increased bankruptcy write-offs in U.S. Cards and U.S. Retail Distribution. |
|
|
Increased credit costs due to seasoning of the rapidly growing Home Equity portfolio in U.S. Consumer Lending. |
|
|
Increased credit costs in International Cards, International Consumer Finance, excluding Japan, and International Retail Banking as the
growing portfolio in all businesses seasons, although the underlying credit environment in all businesses are forecast to remain stable. |
|
|
In International Consumer Finance Japan the impact of the changes to consumer lending laws enacted in 2006 will continue to affect the credit environment.
|
66
CORPORATE CREDIT RISK
For corporate clients and investment banking activities across the organization, the credit process is
grounded in a series of fundamental policies, including:
|
|
joint business and independent risk management responsibility for managing credit risks; |
|
|
single center of control for each credit relationship that coordinates credit activities with that client; |
|
|
portfolio limits to ensure diversification and maintain risk/capital alignment; |
|
|
a minimum of two-authorized credit officer-signatures are required on extensions of credit(one from a sponsoring credit officer in the business and one from a
credit officer in independent credit risk management); |
|
|
risk rating standards, applicable to every obligor and facility; and |
|
|
consistent standards for credit origination documentation and remedial management. |
The following table represents the corporate credit portfolio, before consideration of collateral, by maturity at December 31, 2006. The Corporate
portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings (which include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers acceptances, certain investment securities and leases) and unfunded commitments (which include unused commitments to lend,
letters of credit and financial guarantees).
Corporate Credit Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2006 |
|
Due within 1 year |
|
Greater than 1 year but within 5 years |
|
Greater than 5 years |
|
Total exposure |
Direct outstandings |
|
$ |
157 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
240 |
Unfunded lending commitments |
|
|
230 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
393 |
Total |
|
$ |
387 |
|
$ |
228 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2005 |
|
Due within 1 year |
|
Greater than 1 year but within 5 years |
|
Greater than 5 years |
|
Total exposure |
Direct outstandings |
|
$ |
106 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
184 |
Unfunded lending commitments |
|
|
194 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
332 |
Total |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
516 |
Portfolio Mix
The
corporate credit portfolio is geographically diverse across counterparty, industry and region. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2006 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
U.S. |
|
46 |
% |
|
47 |
% |
EMEA |
|
29 |
|
|
26 |
|
Japan |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Asia |
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
Latin America |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Mexico |
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all
lines of business, geographic regions and products.
Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor, and
are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances), or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk
rating, and then factors that affect the loss-given-default of the facility such as support or collateral are taken into account.
Internal
obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment-grade. Ratings below the equivalent of BBB are considered non-investment-grade.
The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating at December 31, 2006 and 2005, as a percentage of the total portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
AAA/AA/A |
|
53 |
% |
|
54 |
% |
BBB |
|
27 |
|
|
29 |
|
BB/B |
|
18 |
|
|
15 |
|
CCC or below |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Unrated |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
The corporate credit portfolio is diversified by industry, with a concentration only to the
financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total
Corporate portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Banks |
|
9 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
Government and central banks |
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
|
Other financial institutions |
|
6 |
|
|
8 |
|
Investment banks |
|
6 |
|
|
5 |
|
Utilities |
|
6 |
|
|
5 |
|
Insurance |
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
Petroleum |
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
Agriculture and food preparation |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Telephone and cable |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
Industrial machinery and equipment |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
Metals |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
Autos |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Freight transportation |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Global information technology |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Chemicals |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Retail |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Other industries (1) |
|
34 |
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
Includes all other industries, none of which exceeds 2% of total outstandings. |
67
Credit Risk Mitigation
As part of its overall risk management activities, the
Company uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The effect of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to credit worthy, independent third
parties. Beginning in the 2003 fourth quarter, the results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in the Principal Transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income. At December 31,
2006 and 2005, $93.0 billion and $40.7 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure was economically hedged. Our expected loss model used in the calculation of our loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and
other risk mitigants. The reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the credit protection was economically hedging
underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution:
Rating of Hedged Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
AAA/AA/A |
|
49 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
BBB |
|
41 |
|
|
43 |
|
BB/B |
|
10 |
|
|
6 |
|
CCC or below |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying
credit exposure with the following industry distribution:
Industry of Hedged Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Utilities |
|
10 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Telephone and cable |
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
Agriculture and food preparation |
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
Petroleum |
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
Autos |
|
5 |
|
|
7 |
|
Other financial institutions |
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
Retail |
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
Industrial machinery and equipment |
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
Chemicals |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Pharmaceuticals |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Insurance |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Natural gas distribution |
|
3 |
|
|
5 |
|
Airlines |
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
Global information technology |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
Metals |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
Investment banks |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
Business services |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
Forest products |
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
Banks |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Freight transportation |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Entertainment |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Other industries (1) |
|
11 |
|
|
6 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
Includes all other industries, none of which is greater than 2% of the total hedged amount. |
Credit Exposure Arising from
Derivatives and Foreign Exchange
Citigroup uses derivatives as both an end-user for asset/liability management and in its client businesses. In CIB,
Citigroup enters into derivatives for trading purposes or to enable customers to transfer, modify or reduce their interest rate, foreign exchange and other market risks. In addition, Citigroup uses derivatives and other instruments, primarily
interest rate and foreign exchange products, as an end-user to manage interest rate risk relating to specific groups of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. Also, foreign exchange contracts are used to hedge non-U.S. dollar denominated debt,
net capital exposures and foreign exchange transactions.
The Companys credit exposure on derivatives and foreign exchange contracts
is primarily to professional counterparties in the financial sector, arising from transactions with banks, investment banks, governments and central banks, and other financial institutions.
For purposes of managing credit exposure on derivative and foreign exchange contracts, particularly when looking at exposure to a single counterparty, the
Company measures and monitors credit exposure taking into account the current mark-to-market value of each contract plus a prudent estimate of its potential change in value over its life. This measurement of the potential future exposure for each
credit facility is based on a stressed simulation of market rates and generally takes into account legally enforceable risk-mitigating agreements for each obligor such as netting and margining.
For asset/liability management hedges, a derivative must be highly effective in accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair
value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness present in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes the changes in the value of the hedged item that are
unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value, which, if excluded, is recognized in current earnings.
The following tables summarize by derivative type the notionals, receivables and payables held for trading and asset/liability management hedge purposes
as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 148 for a discussion regarding the accounting for derivatives.
68
CITIGROUP DERIVATIVES
Notionals (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Trading Derivatives (2) |
|
Asset/Liability Management Hedges (3) |
As of December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
14,196,404 |
|
$ |
12,677,814 |
|
$ |
561,376 |
|
$ |
403,576 |
Futures and forwards |
|
|
1,824,205 |
|
|
2,090,844 |
|
|
75,374 |
|
|
18,425 |
Written options |
|
|
3,054,990 |
|
|
1,949,501 |
|
|
12,764 |
|
|
5,166 |
Purchased options |
|
|
2,953,122 |
|
|
1,633,983 |
|
|
35,420 |
|
|
53,920 |
Total interest rate contract notionals |
|
$ |
22,028,721 |
|
$ |
18,352,142 |
|
$ |
684,934 |
|
$ |
481,087 |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
722,063 |
|
$ |
563,888 |
|
$ |
53,216 |
|
$ |
37,418 |
Futures and forwards |
|
|
2,068,310 |
|
|
1,508,754 |
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
53,757 |
Written options |
|
|
416,951 |
|
|
249,725 |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
Purchased options |
|
|
404,859 |
|
|
253,089 |
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
808 |
Total foreign exchange contract notionals |
|
$ |
3,612,183 |
|
$ |
2,575,456 |
|
$ |
98,365 |
|
$ |
91,983 |
Equity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
104,320 |
|
$ |
70,188 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
36,362 |
|
|
14,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written options |
|
|
387,781 |
|
|
213,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased options |
|
|
355,891 |
|
|
193,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity contract notionals |
|
$ |
884,354 |
|
$ |
491,306 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Commodity and other contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
35,611 |
|
$ |
20,486 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
17,433 |
|
|
10,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written options |
|
|
11,991 |
|
|
9,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased options |
|
|
16,904 |
|
|
12,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commodity and other contract notionals |
|
$ |
81,939 |
|
$ |
53,363 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
$ |
1,944,980 |
|
$ |
1,030,745 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Total derivative notionals |
|
$ |
28,552,177 |
|
$ |
22,503,012 |
|
$ |
783,299 |
|
$ |
573,070 |
Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in millions of dollars |
|
Derivatives ReceivablesMTM |
|
|
Derivatives PayableMTM |
|
As of December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trading Derivatives (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
167,521 |
|
|
$ |
192,761 |
|
|
$ |
166,119 |
|
|
$ |
188,182 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
52,297 |
|
|
|
42,749 |
|
|
|
47,469 |
|
|
|
41,474 |
|
Equity contracts |
|
|
26,883 |
|
|
|
18,633 |
|
|
|
52,980 |
|
|
|
32,313 |
|
Commodity and other contracts |
|
|
5,387 |
|
|
|
7,332 |
|
|
|
5,776 |
|
|
|
6,986 |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
|
14,069 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
15,081 |
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
266,157 |
|
|
$ |
269,581 |
|
|
$ |
287,425 |
|
|
$ |
278,234 |
|
Less: Netting agreements, cash collateral and market value adjustments |
|
|
(216,616 |
) |
|
|
(222,167 |
) |
|
|
(212,621 |
) |
|
|
(216,906 |
) |
Net Receivables/Payables |
|
$ |
49,541 |
|
|
$ |
47,414 |
|
|
$ |
74,804 |
|
|
$ |
61,328 |
|
Asset/Liability Management Hedges (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
1,801 |
|
|
$ |
3,775 |
|
|
$ |
3,327 |
|
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,461 |
|
|
$ |
5,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,274 |
|
|
$ |
2,752 |
|
(1) |
Includes the notional amounts for long and short derivative positions. |
(2) |
Trading Derivatives include proprietary and market-making activities where the changes in market value are recorded to trading assets or trading liabilities. |
(3) |
Asset/Liability Management Hedges include only those end-user derivative instruments where the changes in market value are recorded to other assets or other liabilities.
|
69
The following table presents the global derivatives portfolio by internal obligor credit rating at December 31, 2006 and 2005, as a percentage of
credit exposure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
AAA/AA/A |
|
79 |
% |
|
80 |
% |
BBB |
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
BB/B |
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
CCC or below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrated |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
The following table presents the global derivatives portfolio by industry of the obligor as a
percentage of credit exposure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Financial institutions |
|
67% |
|
|
67 |
% |
Governments |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
Corporations |
|
22 |
|
|
21 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
GLOBAL CORPORATE PORTFOLIO REVIEW
Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a non-accrual basis (cash-basis)
when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is past due for 90 days or more; the exception is when the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Impaired corporate loans are
written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value, less disposal costs.
The following table summarizes corporate cash-basis loans and net credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Corporate cash-basis loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets and Banking |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
923 |
|
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
Transaction Services |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Total corporate cash-basis loans (1) |
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
1,004 |
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
Net credit losses (recoveries) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets and Banking |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
($ |
268 |
) |
|
$ |
148 |
|
Transaction Services |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Alternative Investments |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net credit losses (recoveries) |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
($ |
277 |
) |
|
$ |
130 |
|
Corporate allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
2,934 |
|
|
$ |
2,860 |
|
|
$ |
2,890 |
|
Corporate allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments (2) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Total corporate allowance for loans, leases and unfunded lending commitments |
|
$ |
4,034 |
|
|
$ |
3,710 |
|
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
As a percentage of total corporate loans (3) |
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
(1) |
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are accreting interest in accordance with SOP 03-3 in 2005. In prior years, these loans were classified in Other Assets. The carrying value of
these loans was $949 million at December 31, 2006, $1,120 million at December 31, 2005 and $1,213 million at December 31, 2004. |
(2) |
Represents additional reserves recorded in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(3) |
Does not include the allowance for unfunded lending commitments. |
Cash-basis loans on December 31, 2006
decreased $469 million from 2005; $423 million of the decrease was in Capital Markets and Banking and $46 million was in Transaction Services. Capital Markets and Banking decreased primarily due to the absence of
cash-basis portfolios in Russia and Australia and decreases in portfolios in Poland and Korea. The decrease in Transaction Services was primarily related to decreases in Mexico.
Cash-basis loans decreased $902 million in 2005 due to decreases of $871 million in Capital Markets and Banking and $31 million in Transaction
Services. Capital Markets and Banking primarily reflected decreases in Brazil, Argentina, KorAm and Europe. Transaction Services decreased primarily due to charge-offs in Brazil.
Total corporate Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) was $316 million, $150 million and $126 million at December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, respectively. The $166 million increase from December 31, 2005 reflects net foreclosures in the U.S. real estate portfolio.
Total corporate loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 were $166 billion as compared to $129 billion at December 31, 2005.
Total corporate net credit losses of $82 million in 2006 increased $359 million compared to the net credit recovery of $277 million in 2005, primarily attributable to the absence of gross credit recoveries experienced
in 2005. Total corporate net credit recoveries of $277 million in 2005 improved $407 million compared to 2004 as higher recoveries more than offset credit losses.
Citigroups total allowance for credit losses for loans, leases and unfunded lending commitments of $10.040 billion at December 31, 2006 is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire
Companys portfolio. For analytical purposes only, the portion of Citigroups allowance for credit losses attributed to the corporate portfolio was $4.034 billion at December 31, 2006, $3.710 billion at December 31, 2005, and
$3.490 billion at December 31, 2004. The $324 million increase in the corporate allowance at December 31, 2006 from December 31, 2005 primarily reflects $250 million in reserve builds related to increases in off-balance sheet
exposures and a slight decline in credit quality. The $220 million increase in the corporate allowance at December 31, 2005 from December 31, 2004 primarily reflects an increase in the allowance for unfunded lending commitments based on
portfolio growth and the deterioration of the underlying portfolio. Losses on corporate lending activities and the level of cash-basis loans can vary widely with respect to timing and amount, particularly within any narrowly defined business or loan
type.
70
LOAN MATURITIES AND FIXED/VARIABLE PRICING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars at year end |
|
Due within 1 year |
|
Over 1 year but within 5 years |
|
Over 5 years |
|
Total |
Corporate loan portfolio maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
$ |
18,883 |
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
$ |
5,180 |
|
$ |
27,436 |
Mortgage and real estate |
|
|
115 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
168 |
Lease financing |
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
258 |
|
|
397 |
|
|
2,101 |
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
80,704 |
|
|
43,178 |
|
|
13,033 |
|
|
136,915 |
Total corporate loans |
|
$ |
101,148 |
|
$ |
46,830 |
|
$ |
18,642 |
|
$ |
166,620 |
Fixed/variable pricing of corporate loans with maturities due after one year (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at fixed interest rates |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,248 |
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
|
Loans at floating or adjustable interest rates |
|
|
|
|
|
37,582 |
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,830 |
|
$ |
18,642 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on contractual terms. Repricing characteristics may effectively be modified from time to time using derivative contracts. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page
148. |
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal
course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in the Capital Resources
and Liquidity on page 86. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in
trading portfolios.
Market risks are measured in accordance with established standards to ensure consistency across businesses and the
ability to aggregate risk. Each business is required to establish, with approval from independent market risk management, a market risk limit framework, including risk measures and controls, that clearly defines approved risk profiles and is within
the parameters of Citigroups overall risk appetite.
In all cases, the businesses are ultimately responsible for the market risks they
take and for remaining within their defined limits.
Non-Trading Portfolios
Interest Rate Risk
One of Citigroups primary business functions is
providing financial products that meet the needs of its customers. Loans and deposits are tailored to the customers requirements with regard to tenor, index, and rate type. Net Interest Revenue (NIR) is the difference between the yield earned
on the non-trading portfolio assets (including customer loans) and rate paid on the liabilities (including customer deposits or company borrowings). The NIR is affected by changes in the level of interest rates. For example:
|
|
At any given time, there may be an unequal amount of assets and liabilities, which are subject to market rates due to maturation or repricing. Whenever the amount
of liabilities subject to repricing exceeds the amount of assets subject to repricing, a company is considered liability sensitive. In this case, a companys NIR will deteriorate in a rising rate environment.
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of a company may reprice at different speeds or mature at different times, subjecting both liability sensitive and
asset sensitive companies to NIR sensitivity from changing interest rates. For example, a company may have a large amount of loans that are subject to repricing this period, but the majority of deposits are not scheduled for repricing
until the following period. That company would suffer from NIR deterioration if interest rates were to fall. |
NIR in the
current period is the result of customer transactions and the related contractual rates originated in prior periods as well as new transactions in the current period; those prior period transactions will be impacted by changes in rates on floating
rate assets and liabilities in the current period.
Due to the long-term nature of the portfolios, NIR will vary from quarter to quarter
even assuming no change in the shape or level of the yield curve as the assets and liabilities reprice. These repricings are a function of implied forward interest rates, which represent the overall markets unbiased estimate of future interest
rates and incorporate possible changes in the Federal Funds rate as well as the shape of the yield curve.
Interest Rate Risk Governance
The risks in Citigroups non-traded portfolios are estimated using a common set of standards that define, measure, limit and report the market risk. Each business is
required to establish, with approval from independent market risk management, a market risk limit framework that clearly defines approved risk profiles and is within the parameters of Citigroups overall risk appetite. In all cases, the
businesses are ultimately responsible for the market risks they take and for remaining within their defined limits. These limits are monitored by independent market risk, country and business Asset and Liability Committees (ALCOs) and the Global
Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO).
71
Interest Rate Risk Measurement
Citigroups principal measure of risk to
NIR is Interest Rate Exposure (IRE). IRE measures the change in expected NIR in each currency resulting solely from unanticipated changes in forward interest rates. Factors such as changes in volumes, spreads, margins and the impact of prior-period
pricing decisions are not captured by IRE. IRE assumes that businesses make no additional changes in pricing or balances in response to the unanticipated rate changes.
IRE tests the impact on NIR resulting from unanticipated changes in forward interest rates. For example, if the current 90-day LIBOR rate is 3.00% and the one-year forward rate is 5.00% (i.e., the estimated 90-day
LIBOR rate in one year), the +100bps IRE scenario measures the impact of the firms NIR of a 100bps instantaneous change in the 90-day LIBOR, to 6% in one year).
The impact of changing prepayment rates on loan portfolios is incorporated into the results. For example, in the declining interest rate scenarios, it is assumed that mortgage portfolios prepay faster and income is
reduced. In addition, in a rising interest rate scenario, portions of the deposit portfolio are assumed to experience rate increases that are less than the change in market interest rates.
Mitigation and Hedging of Risk
All financial institutions financial
performance is subject to some degree of risk due to changes in interest rates. In order to manage these risks effectively, Citigroup may modify pricing on new customer loans and deposits, enter into transactions with other institutions or enter
into off-balance sheet derivative transactions that have the opposite risk exposures. Therefore, Citigroup regularly assesses the viability of strategies to reduce unacceptable risks to earnings and implements such strategies when the Company
believes those actions are prudent. As information becomes available, Citigroup formulates strategies aimed at protecting earnings from the potential negative effects of changes in interest rates.
Citigroup employs additional measurements, including stress testing the impact of non-linear interest rate movements on the value of the balance sheet;
the analysis of portfolio duration and volatility, particularly as they relate to mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities; and the potential impact of the change in the spread between different market indices.
The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to NIR assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100bp change, as
well as a more gradual 100bp (25bp per quarter) parallel change in rates as compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instantaneous change |
|
$ |
(728 |
) |
|
$ |
627 |
|
|
$ |
(155 |
) |
|
$ |
284 |
|
Gradual change |
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
$ |
66 |
|
Mexican peso |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instantaneous change |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
Gradual change |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
Euro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instantaneous change |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
Gradual change |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
Japanese yen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instantaneous change |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Gradual change |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Pound sterling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instantaneous change |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Gradual change |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the
Japanese yen yield curve.
The changes in the U.S. dollar interest rate exposures from the prior year
reflect changes in customer-related asset and liability balances, additional available-for-sale securities as well as Citigroups view of prevailing interest rates.
72
The following table shows the risk to NIR
from six different changes in the implied forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario 1 |
|
|
Scenario 2 |
|
|
Scenario 3 |
|
|
Scenario 4 |
|
|
Scenario 5 |
|
|
Scenario 6 |
|
Overnight rate change (bp) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
10-year rate change (bp) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Impact to net interest revenue (in millions of dollars) |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
($ |
366 |
) |
|
($ |
821 |
) |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
($ |
296 |
) |
Trading Portfolios
Price risk in trading portfolios is monitored using a series
of measures, including:
|
|
Value-at-Risk (VAR); and |
Factor sensitivities
are expressed as the change in the value of a position for a defined change in a market risk factor, such as a change in the value of a Treasury bill for a one basis point change in interest rates. Citigroups independent market risk management
ensures that factor sensitivities are calculated, monitored and, in most cases, limited, for all relevant risks taken in a trading portfolio.
VAR estimates the potential decline in the value of a position or a portfolio under normal market conditions. The VAR method incorporates the factor sensitivities of the trading portfolio with the volatilities and correlations of those
factors and is expressed as the risk to the Company over a one-day holding period, at a 99% confidence level. Citigroups VAR is based on the volatilities of and correlations between a multitude of market risk factors as well as factors that
track the specific issuer risk in debt and equity securities.
Stress testing is performed on trading portfolios on a regular basis to
estimate the impact of extreme market movements. It is performed on both individual trading portfolios, as well as on aggregations of portfolios and businesses. Independent market risk management, in conjunction with the businesses, develops stress
scenarios, reviews the output of periodic stress testing exercises, and uses the information to make judgments as to the ongoing appropriateness of exposure levels and limits.
Each trading portfolio has its own market risk
limit framework, encompassing these measures and other controls, including permitted product lists and a new product approval process for complex products.
Risk capital for market risk in trading portfolios is based on an annualized VAR figure, with adjustments for intra-day trading activity.
Total revenues of the trading business consist of:
|
|
Customer revenue, which includes spreads from customer flow and positions taken to facilitate customer orders; |
|
|
Proprietary trading activities in both cash and derivative transactions; and |
All trading
positions are marked-to-market, with the result reflected in earnings. In 2006, negative trading-related revenue (net losses) were recorded for 25 of 251 trading days. Of the 25 days on which negative revenue (net losses) was recorded, only four
were greater than $30 million. The following histogram of total daily revenue or loss captures trading volatility and shows the number of days in which the Companys trading-related revenues fell within particular ranges.
73
Citigroup periodically performs extensive
back-testing of many hypothetical test portfolios as one check of the accuracy of its VAR. Back-testing is the process in which the daily VAR of a portfolio is compared to the actual daily change in the market value of its transactions. Back-testing
is conducted to confirm that the daily market value losses in excess of 99% confidence level occur, on average, only 1% of the time. The VAR calculation for the hypothetical test portfolios, with different degrees of risk concentration, meets this
statistical criteria.
The level of price risk exposure at any given point in time depends on the market environment and expectations of
future price and market movements, and will vary from period to period.
For Citigroups major trading centers, the aggregate pretax
VAR in the trading portfolios was $106 million at December 31, 2006 and $93 million at December 31, 2005. Daily exposures averaged $99 million in 2006 and ranged from $71 million to $133 million.
The following table summarizes VAR to Citigroup in the trading portfolios as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, including the Total VAR, the specific
risk only component of VAR, and TotalGeneral market factors only, along with the yearly averages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2006 Average |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2005 Average |
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Equity |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Covariance adjustment |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Total All market risk factors, including general and specific risk |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
Specific risk only component |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Total General market factors only |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
The specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and debt issuer-specific risk
embedded in VAR. Citigroups specific risk model conforms to the 4x-multiplier treatment approved by the Federal Reserve and is subject to extensive annual hypothetical back-testing.
The table below provides the range of VAR in each type of trading portfolio that was experienced during 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
In millions of dollars |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
Interest rate |
|
$ |
64 |
|
$ |
125 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
155 |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
16 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
23 |
Equity |
|
|
35 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
63 |
Commodity |
|
|
5 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
24 |
74
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal
processes, people or systems, or from external events. It includes the reputation and franchise risk associated with business practices or market conduct that the Company undertakes. Operational risk is inherent in Citigroups global business
activities and, as with other risk types, is managed through an overall framework with checks and balances that include:
|
|
Recognized ownership of the risk by the businesses; |
|
|
Oversight by independent risk management; and |
|
|
Independent review by Audit and Risk Review (ARR). |
Framework
Citigroups approach to operational risk is defined in the Citigroup Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA)/ Operational
Risk Policy.
The objective of the Policy is to establish a consistent, value-added framework for assessing and communicating operational
risk and the overall effectiveness of the internal control environment across Citigroup. Each major business segment must implement an operational risk process consistent with the requirements of this Policy. The process for operational risk
includes the following steps:
|
|
Identify and assess Key Operational Risks; |
|
|
Establish Key Risk Indicators; and |
|
|
Produce a comprehensive operational risk report. |
The Operational Risk standards facilitate the effective communication of operational risk both within and across businesses. Information about the businesses operational risk, historical losses, and the control
environment is reported by each major business segment and functional area, and summarized for Senior Management and the Citigroup Board of Directors.
The RCSA standards establish a formal governance structure to provide direction, oversight, and monitoring of Citigroups RCSA programs. The RCSA standards for risk and control assessment are applicable to all
businesses and staff functions. They establish RCSA as the process whereby important risks inherent in a business activities are identified and the effectiveness of the key controls over those risks are evaluated and monitored. RCSA processes
facilitate Citigroups adherence to regulatory requirements, including Sarbanes-Oxley, FDICIA, the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards (Basel II), and other corporate initiatives, including Operational Risk
Management and alignment of capital assessments with risk management objectives. The entire process is subject to audit by Citigroups ARR, and the results of RCSA are included in periodic management reporting, including reporting to Senior
Management and the Audit and Risk Management Committee.
Measurement and Basel II
To support advanced capital modeling and management, the businesses are required to capture relevant operational risk capital information. An enhanced version of the risk
capital model for operational risk has been developed and implemented across the major business segments as a step toward readiness for Basel II capital calculations. The risk capital calculation is designed to qualify as an Advanced
Measurement Approach (AMA) under Basel II. It uses a combination of internal and external loss data to support statistical modeling of capital requirement estimates, which are then adjusted to reflect qualitative data regarding the operational
risk and control environment.
Information Security and Continuity of Business
During 2006, Citigroup continued to enhance a strategic framework for Information Security technology initiatives, and the Company began implementing enhancements to various Information Security programs across its
businesses covering Information Security Risk Management, Security Incident Response and Electronic Transportable Media. The Company continues to implement tools to increase the effectiveness of its data protection and entitlement management
programs. Additional monthly Information Security metrics were established to better assist the Information Technology Risk Officer in managing enterprise-wide risk. The Information Security Program complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other
regulatory guidance.
The Corporate Office of Business Continuity, with the support of Senior Management, continues to coordinate global
preparedness and mitigate business continuity risks by reviewing and testing recovery procedures.
75
COUNTRY AND CROSS-BORDER RISK
MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Country Risk
Country risk is the risk that an event in a foreign country will impair the value of Citigroup assets or will adversely affect
the ability of obligors within that country to honor their obligations to Citigroup. Country risk events may include sovereign defaults, banking or currency crises, social instability, and changes in governmental policies (for example,
expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and other changes in legislation relating to international ownership). Country risk includes local franchise risk, credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and cross-border risk.
The Country risk management framework at Citigroup includes a number of tools and management processes designed to facilitate the ongoing analysis of
individual countries and their risks. These include country risk rating models, scenario planning and stress testing, internal watch lists, and the Country Risk Committee process.
The Citigroup Country Risk Committee is the senior forum to evaluate the Companys total business footprint within a specific country franchise with
emphasis on responses to current potential country risk events. The Committee is chaired by the Head of Global Country Risk Management and includes as its members senior risk management officers, senior regional business heads, and senior product
heads. The Committee regularly reviews all risk exposures within a country, makes recommendations as to actions, and follows up to ensure appropriate accountability.
Cross-border Risk
Cross-border risk is the risk that actions taken by a non-U.S. government may prevent the conversion of
local currency into non-local currency and/or the transfer of funds outside of the country, thereby impacting the ability of the Company and its customers to transact business across borders.
Examples of cross-border risk include actions taken by foreign governments such as exchange controls, debt moratoria, or restrictions on the remittance of
funds. These actions might restrict the transfer of funds or the ability of the Company to obtain payment from customers on their contractual obligations.
Management oversight of cross-border risk is performed through a formal review process that includes annual setting of cross-border limits and/or exposures, monitoring of economic conditions globally, and the
establishment of internal cross-border risk management policies.
Under Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC)
regulatory guidelines, total reported cross-border outstandings include cross-border claims on third parties, as well as investments in and funding of local franchises. Cross-border claims on third parties (trade, short-term, and medium- and
long-term claims) include cross-border loans, securities, deposits with banks, investments in affiliates, and other monetary assets, as well as net revaluation gains on foreign exchange and derivative products.
Cross-border outstandings are reported based on the country of the obligor or guarantor. Outstandings backed by cash collateral are assigned to the
country in which the collateral is held. For securities received as collateral, cross-border outstandings are reported in the domicile of the issuer of the securities. Cross-border resale agreements are presented based on the domicile of the
counterparty in accordance with FFIEC guidelines.
Investments in and funding of local franchises represent the excess of local country
assets over local country liabilities. Local country assets are claims on local residents recorded by branches and majority-owned subsidiaries of Citigroup domiciled in the country, adjusted for externally guaranteed claims and certain collateral.
Local country liabilities are obligations of non-U.S. branches and majority-owned subsidiaries of Citigroup for which no cross-border guarantee has been issued by another Citigroup office.
The table below shows all countries in which total FFIEC cross-border outstandings exceed
0.75% of total Citigroup assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Cross-border claims on third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Banks |
|
Public |
|
Private |
|
Total |
|
Trading and short-term claims (1) |
|
Investments in and funding of local franchises |
|
Total cross- border outstandings |
|
Commitments (2) |
|
Total cross- border outstandings |
|
Commitments |
Germany |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
$ |
25.0 |
India |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
0.7 |
Netherlands |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
9.2 |
France |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
33.5 |
Spain |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
2.8 |
South Korea |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
5.2 |
Italy |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
3.0 |
United Kingdom (3) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
192.8 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
103.8 |
Canada |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
2.9 |
(1) |
Included in total cross-border claims on third parties. |
(2) |
Commitments (not included in total cross-border outstandings) include legally binding cross-border letters of credit and other commitments and contingencies as defined by the FFIEC. Effective
March 31, 2006, the FFIEC revised the definition of commitments to include commitments to local residents to be funded with local currency local liabilities. |
(3) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
76
BALANCE SHEET REVIEW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 (1) |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
% Change |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income and allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
670 |
|
$ |
574 |
|
$ |
96 |
|
17 |
% |
Trading account assets |
|
|
394 |
|
|
296 |
|
|
98 |
|
33 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
283 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
66 |
|
30 |
|
Investments |
|
|
274 |
|
|
181 |
|
|
93 |
|
51 |
|
All other assets |
|
|
263 |
|
|
226 |
|
|
37 |
|
16 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
26 |
% |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
712 |
|
$ |
592 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
20 |
% |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
349 |
|
|
242 |
|
|
107 |
|
44 |
|
Brokerage payables |
|
|
85 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
14 |
|
20 |
|
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt |
|
|
389 |
|
|
284 |
|
|
105 |
|
37 |
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
146 |
|
|
121 |
|
|
25 |
|
21 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
83 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
12 |
|
17 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
$ |
1,381 |
|
$ |
383 |
|
28 |
% |
Stockholders equity |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
6 |
% |
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
26 |
% |
(1) |
|
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
Loans
Loans are an extension of credit to individuals, corporations, and government institutions. Loans vary across regions and industry and primarily include credit cards,
mortgages, other real estate lending, personal loans, auto loans, student loans, and corporate loans.
Consumer and corporate loans
comprised 76% and 24%, respectively, of total loans (net of unearned income and before the allowance for loan losses).
Consumer loans
increased by $58 billion, or 13%, primarily due to:
|
|
$39 billion, or 17%, increase in mortgage and real estate loans; |
|
|
$19 billion, or 9%, increase in installment and revolving credit; which was partially driven by the following acquisitions: |
|
|
The $3 billion Federated credit card portfolio; |
|
|
The $1 billion in loans from Brazils CrediCard consolidation; and |
|
|
The $1 billion Exxon Mobil private label credit card receivables. |
Corporate Loans increased $38 billion, or 29%, primarily driven by increases of:
|
|
$31 billion, or 30%, in commercial and industrial loans; and |
|
|
$5 billion, or 29%, in loans to financial institutions. |
During 2006, average consumer loans (net of unearned income) of $480 billion yielded an average rate of 9.0%, compared to $437 billion and 9.0% in the prior year. Average corporate loans of $153 billion yielded
an average rate of 7.7% in 2006, compared to $120 billion and 6.6% in the prior year.
For further information, see Loans
Outstanding on page 61 and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 136.
Trading Account Assets (Liabilities)
Trading account assets include U.S. Government securities, corporate securities, equities, derivatives, and other securities acquired for the purpose of
facilitating customer transactions and proprietary risk-taking. Trading account liabilities include short positions arising from sales of securities and other assets, and the fair value of derivative contracts held for trading that are in a loss
position.
All trading account assets and liabilities are reported at their fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in current income.
Trading account assets increased by $98 billion, or 33%, due to:
|
|
$34 billion, or 56%, increase in corporate and other debt securities; |
|
|
$28 billion, or 43%, increase in equity securities; |
|
|
$12 billion, or 55%, increase in foreign government securities; |
|
|
$9 billion, or 33%, increase in mortgage loans and collateralized mortgage securities (CMOs); |
|
|
$6 billion, or 15%, increase in U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities; |
|
|
$2 billion, or 4%, increase in revaluation gains primarily consisting of increases from foreign exchange, equity, and credit derivative contracts, a decrease in
netting permitted under master netting agreements, and an offset from a decrease in gains related to interest rate contracts; and |
|
|
$7 billion, or 20%, net increase in other trading securities. |
Total average trading account assets were $290 billion in 2006, compared to $235 billion in 2005, yielding average rates of 4.1%, and 3.5%, respectively.
Trading account liabilities increased by $25 billion, or 21%, due to:
|
|
$14 billion, or 22%, increase in revaluation losses primarily consisting of increases from equity, foreign exchange and credit derivative contracts, a decrease in
netting permitted under master netting agreements, and an offset from a decrease in losses related to interest rate contracts; and |
|
|
$11 billion, or 19%, increase in securities sold, not yet purchased comprising of a $9 billion increase in debt securities and a $2 billion increase in U.S.
treasury securities. |
In 2006, average trading account liabilities were $75 billion, yielding an average rate of 1.5%,
compared to $74 billion and 0.9% in the prior year.
For further discussion regarding trading account assets and liabilities, see Note 14 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 133.
77
Federal Funds Sold (Purchased) and Securities Borrowed (Loaned) or Purchased (Sold) Under Agreements to Resell (Repurchase)
Federal funds sold and federal funds purchased consist of unsecured advances of excess balances in reserve accounts held at Federal Reserve Banks. When the Company
advances federal funds to a third party, it is selling its excess reserves. Similarly, when the Company receives federal funds, the Company is purchasing reserves from a third party. These interest-bearing transactions typically have an original
maturity of one business day.
Securities borrowed and securities loaned are recorded at the amount of cash advanced or received. With
respect to securities borrowed, the Company pays cash collateral in an amount in excess of the market value of securities borrowed, and receives excess in the case of securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed
and loaned on a daily basis with additional collateral advanced or obtained as necessary. Interest received or paid for these transactions are recorded in interest income or interest expense.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are treated as collateralized financing transactions
and are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired or resold, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements. The Companys policy is to take possession of securities purchased under
agreements to resell. The market value of securities to be repurchased and resold is monitored, and additional collateral is obtained where appropriate to protect against credit exposure.
The increase of $66 billion, or 30%, in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell was primarily driven by
a shift from securities purchased under agreements to resell to securities borrowed. This resulted in a decline in the netting benefits permissible under FIN 41 as securities borrowed do not qualify for FIN 41 netting. Securities purchased
under agreements to resell remained relatively unchanged on a net basis, while securities borrowed increased.
The increase of $107 billion,
or 44%, in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase was primarily due to a $65 billion decrease in FIN 41 netting, as well as a $27 billion increase in securities loaned, which was driven by the funding
needs for the increases in trading assets.
For further information regarding these balance sheet categories, see Note 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements on page 132.
Investments
Investments consist of fixed income and equity securities. Fixed
income includes bonds, notes and redeemable preferred stock, as well as loan-backed securities (such as mortgage-backed securities) and other structured notes. Equity securities include common and nonredeemable preferred stocks. These instruments
provide the Company with long-term investment opportunities while in most cases remaining relatively liquid.
These investments are
primarily carried at fair value with the changes in fair value generally recognized in stockholders equity (Accumulated other comprehensive income). Declines in fair value that are deemed other-than-temporary are recognized in current
earnings, as well as gains and losses from the sale of these investment securities.
Investments increased by $93 billion, or 51%, due to
the following increases:
|
|
$69 billion in mortgage-backed securities, which is primarily due to the expansion of a Mortgage-Backed Securities Program in the U.S. Consumer
Lending business; |
|
|
$7 billion in U.S. corporate securities; |
|
|
$6 billion in foreign government securities; and |
|
|
net $11 billion for all other securities. |
For further information regarding investments, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 134.
Deposits
Deposits represent customer funds that are payable on demand or upon maturity. They can be interest-bearing or non-interest-bearing. Interest-bearing deposits payable by
foreign and U.S. domestic banking subsidiaries of the Company comprise 62% and 27% of total deposits, respectively, while non-interest-bearing deposits comprise 5% and 6% of total deposits, respectively.
Total deposits increased by $120 billion, or 20%, primarily due to:
|
|
Strong growth in corporate interest-bearing deposits in all regions, notably in Europe, North America and Asia. Increases reflected the impact of rising short-term
interest rates, as well as increased client transactional volumes; and |
|
|
Growth in retail deposits primarily from high-yield savings accounts, time deposits and money market accounts in the consumer businesses. U.S. deposits grew in
interest-bearing time deposits, CDs, money market and e-savings accounts, driven by internal growth through branch expansion, competitive interest rates, and marketing campaigns of new products. In regions outside of the U.S., deposits grew as a
result of continued branch and client acquisition and servicing channel expansion, competitive interest rates and marketing campaigns of new products. |
Average deposits increased $80 billion to $587 billion in 2006, yielding an average rate of 3.7%, compared to 2.7% in the prior year.
For more information on deposits, see Capital Resources and Liquidity on page 86.
78
Brokerage Payables
Brokerage Payables include payables arising from unsettled
trades including securities purchased, but not yet received by the Company as of the settlement date (fails to receive).
These
payables increased by $14 billion, or 20%. The brokerage payables balance fluctuates based upon investment security inventory levels, trade activity, and the timing of trade settlements.
See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 133.
Debt
Debt is comprised of both short-term and long-term borrowings. It includes commercial paper, borrowings from unaffiliated banks,
senior notes (including collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank), subordinated notes, and trust preferred securities.
Debt
increased by $105 billion, or 37%, as short-term borrowings increased $34 billion, or 51%, and long-term debt increased $71 billion, or 33%.
The increase in short-term borrowings included an increase of $10 billion in commercial paper, and an increase of $24 billion in other funds borrowed. The increase was used to fund both trading and non-trading
activities.
Average commercial paper outstanding in 2006 was $32 billion and yielded an average rate of 5.0%, compared to $26 billion and
3.1% in 2005. Average other funds borrowed in 2006 was $39 billion, yielding an average rate of 4.1%, compared to $32 billion and 4.1% in the prior year.
As for long-term debt, the Company took advantage of flattening yield curves and the positive credit environment experienced during 2006 to extend the maturities of new borrowings and issued/acquired additional debt
from new acquisitions as U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar-denominated fixed and variable rate senior debt increased by $62 billion, while subordinated debt increased by $6 billion. These increases were driven by new issuances of $114 billion, offset
by repayments/redemptions and maturities totaling $46 billion. The increase in long-term debt was primarily used to fund growth in the mortgage loan portfolio and to fund the mortgage-backed securities investment portfolios. Additionally, trust
preferred securities increased by $3 billion.
Average long-term debt outstanding during 2006 was $245 billion, compared to $212
billion in 2005, yielding an average rate of 4.9% and 3.7%, respectively.
For more information on debt, see Note 19 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements on page 139 and Capital Resources and Liquidity on page 86.
79
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Global consumer |
|
|
Corporate and investment banking |
|
|
Global wealth management |
|
|
Alternative investments |
|
Corporate/other & consolidating eliminations |
|
|
Total Citigroup consolidated |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
10,084 |
|
|
$ |
14,887 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
31,990 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
42,522 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
281,088 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,817 |
|
Brokerage receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,738 |
|
|
|
13,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,445 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
6,064 |
|
|
|
386,873 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,925 |
|
Investments |
|
|
118,777 |
|
|
|
132,421 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
10,758 |
|
|
11,396 |
|
|
|
273,591 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
467,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,921 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,271 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
467,327 |
|
|
$ |
166,165 |
|
|
$ |
45,594 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
679,192 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(5,872 |
) |
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,940 |
) |
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
461,455 |
|
|
$ |
163,231 |
|
|
$ |
45,460 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
670,252 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
26,130 |
|
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,415 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
15,274 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,901 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
54,444 |
|
|
|
30,105 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
12,946 |
|
|
|
100,936 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
701,845 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,787 |
|
|
$ |
65,916 |
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
Liabilities and Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
279,499 |
|
|
$ |
335,356 |
|
|
$ |
97,041 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
712,041 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
339,551 |
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,235 |
|
Brokerage payables |
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
75,237 |
|
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
85,119 |
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
145,411 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,887 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
5,256 |
|
|
|
43,364 |
|
|
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,770 |
|
|
|
100,833 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
93,712 |
|
|
|
61,371 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,980 |
|
|
|
288,494 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
33,872 |
|
|
|
37,247 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
82,926 |
|
Net intersegment funding/(lending) |
|
|
276,843 |
|
|
|
40,250 |
|
|
|
(52,204 |
) |
|
|
9,761 |
|
|
(274,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,783 |
|
|
|
119,783 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
701,845 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,787 |
|
|
$ |
65,916 |
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
The above supplemental information reflects the Companys consolidated GAAP balance sheet by
reporting segment. The respective segment information closely depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment. While this presentation is not defined by GAAP, the Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance
investors understanding of the balance sheet components managed by the underlying business segments as well as the beneficial interrelationship of the asset and liability dynamics of the balance sheet components among the Companys
business segments. The Company believes that investors may find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance.
80
Interest Revenue/Expense and Yields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change 2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
% Change 2005 vs. 2004 |
|
Interest Revenue (1) (2) |
|
$ |
96,431 |
|
|
$ |
75,916 |
|
|
$ |
63,621 |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
19 |
% |
Interest Expense |
|
|
56,943 |
|
|
|
36,676 |
|
|
|
22,004 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
67 |
|
Net Interest Revenue (1) (2) |
|
$ |
39,488 |
|
|
$ |
39,240 |
|
|
$ |
41,617 |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
(6 |
)% |
Interest RevenueAverage Rate (2) |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
5.93 |
% |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
55 |
bps |
|
37 |
bps |
Interest ExpenseAverage Rate |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
|
105 |
bps |
|
107 |
bps |
Net Interest Margin (2) |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
(41 |
) bps |
|
(58 |
) bps |
Interest Rate Benchmarks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds RateEnd of Period |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
100 |
bps |
|
200 |
bps |
2-Year U.S. Treasury NoteAverage Rate |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
96 |
bps |
|
147 |
bps |
10-Year U.S. Treasury NoteAverage Rate |
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
51 |
bps |
|
1 |
bps |
10-Year vs. 2-Year Spread |
|
|
(2 |
) bps |
|
|
43 |
bps |
|
|
189 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes taxable equivalent adjustment based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%. |
(2) |
2006 includes a $(666) million reduction of interest revenue related to consumer lending in Japan. This impacted the average rate on average interest-earning assets by 4 basis points and the
net interest margin by 5 basis points. |
A significant portion of the Companys
business activities is based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing gross interest revenue less
gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.
During 2006, pressure on net interest margin continued, driven by several
factors. Interest expense increased due to both a rise in short-term interest rates and funding actions the Company has taken to lengthen its debt maturity profile.
The average rate on the Companys assets
increased during the period, but by less than the increase in average rates on borrowed funds or deposits. The average rate on loans reflected a highly competitive loan pricing environment, as well as a shift in the Companys loan portfolio
from higher-yielding credit card receivables to assets that carry lower yields, such as mortgages and home equity loans. The shift partially reflects increased securitization activity and, while moderating, continued high payment rates on credit
card receivables.
81
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES ASSETS (1) (2) (3) (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume |
|
Interest Revenue |
|
% Average Rate |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with banks (5) |
|
$ |
37,977 |
|
$ |
34,211 |
|
$ |
28,339 |
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
$ |
536 |
|
6.03 |
% |
|
4.49 |
% |
|
1.89 |
% |
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
166,202 |
|
$ |
154,578 |
|
$ |
129,538 |
|
$ |
10,258 |
|
$ |
7,041 |
|
$ |
2,979 |
|
6.17 |
% |
|
4.55 |
% |
|
2.30 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (5) |
|
|
85,200 |
|
|
74,728 |
|
|
73,829 |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
2,043 |
|
4.63 |
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
2.77 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
251,402 |
|
$ |
229,306 |
|
$ |
203,367 |
|
$ |
14,199 |
|
$ |
9,790 |
|
$ |
5,022 |
|
5.65 |
% |
|
4.27 |
% |
|
2.47 |
% |
Trading account assets (7) (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
188,985 |
|
$ |
154,716 |
|
$ |
125,597 |
|
$ |
8,537 |
|
$ |
5,678 |
|
$ |
4,435 |
|
4.52 |
% |
|
3.67 |
% |
|
3.53 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (5) |
|
|
100,634 |
|
|
80,367 |
|
|
70,458 |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
2,034 |
|
3.31 |
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
2.89 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
289,619 |
|
$ |
235,083 |
|
$ |
196,055 |
|
$ |
11,865 |
|
$ |
8,137 |
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
4.10 |
% |
|
3.46 |
% |
|
3.30 |
% |
Investments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
106,136 |
|
$ |
77,000 |
|
$ |
70,861 |
|
$ |
4,799 |
|
$ |
2,623 |
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
4.52 |
% |
|
3.41 |
% |
|
3.02 |
% |
Exempt from U.S. income tax |
|
|
14,023 |
|
|
10,852 |
|
|
8,582 |
|
|
661 |
|
|
481 |
|
|
410 |
|
4.71 |
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
4.78 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (5) |
|
|
98,640 |
|
|
81,309 |
|
|
74,665 |
|
|
4,939 |
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
3,650 |
|
5.01 |
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
4.89 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
218,799 |
|
$ |
169,161 |
|
$ |
154,108 |
|
$ |
10,399 |
|
$ |
7,338 |
|
$ |
6,203 |
|
4.75 |
% |
|
4.34 |
% |
|
4.03 |
% |
Loans (net of unearned income) (9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
341,315 |
|
$ |
306,396 |
|
$ |
283,659 |
|
$ |
28,472 |
|
$ |
24,874 |
|
$ |
23,991 |
|
8.34 |
% |
|
8.12 |
% |
|
8.46 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (5) |
|
|
138,978 |
|
|
130,550 |
|
|
117,476 |
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
14,238 |
|
|
12,650 |
|
10.63 |
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
10.77 |
|
Total consumer loans |
|
$ |
480,293 |
|
$ |
436,946 |
|
$ |
401,135 |
|
$ |
43,245 |
|
$ |
39,112 |
|
$ |
36,641 |
|
9.00 |
% |
|
8.95 |
% |
|
9.13 |
% |
Corporate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
28,113 |
|
$ |
19,200 |
|
$ |
16,030 |
|
$ |
1,941 |
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
$ |
918 |
|
6.90 |
% |
|
5.91 |
% |
|
5.73 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (5) |
|
|
124,462 |
|
|
101,262 |
|
|
91,644 |
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
6,837 |
|
|
6,175 |
|
7.90 |
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
6.74 |
|
Total corporate loans |
|
$ |
152,575 |
|
$ |
120,462 |
|
$ |
107,674 |
|
$ |
11,777 |
|
$ |
7,971 |
|
$ |
7,093 |
|
7.72 |
% |
|
6.62 |
% |
|
6.59 |
% |
Total loans |
|
$ |
632,868 |
|
$ |
557,408 |
|
$ |
508,809 |
|
$ |
55,022 |
|
$ |
47,083 |
|
$ |
43,734 |
|
8.69 |
% |
|
8.45 |
% |
|
8.60 |
% |
Other interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
57,472 |
|
$ |
56,095 |
|
$ |
53,741 |
|
$ |
2,657 |
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
4.62 |
% |
|
3.62 |
% |
|
3.08 |
% |
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
1,488,137 |
|
$ |
1,281,264 |
|
$ |
1,144,419 |
|
$ |
96,431 |
|
$ |
75,916 |
|
$ |
63,621 |
|
6.48 |
% |
|
5.93 |
% |
|
5.56 |
% |
Non-interest-earning assets (7) |
|
|
191,408 |
|
|
165,604 |
|
|
175,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
51,270 |
|
|
96,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,679,545 |
|
$ |
1,498,138 |
|
$ |
1,416,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $98 million, $158 million, and $150 million for 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively. |
(2) |
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements on page 148. |
(3) |
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable. |
(4) |
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118. |
(5) |
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries. |
(6) |
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 and interest revenue excludes the impact of FIN 41.
|
(7) |
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities. |
(8) |
Interest expense on trading account liabilities of CIB is reported as a reduction of interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in
trading account assets and trading account liabilities, respectively. |
(9) |
Includes cash-basis loans. |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
82
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE (1) (2) (3) (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume |
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
% Average rate |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits (5) |
|
$ |
134,761 |
|
$ |
127,783 |
|
$ |
120,426 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
$ |
2,411 |
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
1.89 |
% |
|
0.89 |
% |
Other time deposits |
|
|
48,559 |
|
|
35,754 |
|
|
30,544 |
|
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
3.15 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (6) |
|
|
403,645 |
|
|
343,647 |
|
|
306,633 |
|
|
|
|
15,130 |
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
2.20 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
586,965 |
|
$ |
507,184 |
|
$ |
457,603 |
|
|
|
$ |
21,657 |
|
$ |
13,502 |
|
$ |
8,790 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
2.66 |
% |
|
1.92 |
% |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
194,726 |
|
$ |
173,674 |
|
$ |
145,326 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,857 |
|
$ |
7,737 |
|
$ |
3,053 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
4.45 |
% |
|
2.10 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (6) |
|
|
95,937 |
|
|
71,921 |
|
|
66,806 |
|
|
|
|
5,591 |
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
4.22 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
290,663 |
|
$ |
245,595 |
|
$ |
212,132 |
|
|
|
$ |
17,448 |
|
$ |
11,855 |
|
$ |
5,874 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
4.83 |
% |
|
2.77 |
% |
Trading account liabilities (8) (9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
36,983 |
|
$ |
34,935 |
|
$ |
37,233 |
|
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
$ |
544 |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
0.64 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (6) |
|
|
37,802 |
|
|
38,737 |
|
|
39,669 |
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
0.17 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
74,785 |
|
$ |
73,672 |
|
$ |
76,902 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
$ |
669 |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
0.91 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
120,123 |
|
$ |
94,342 |
|
$ |
86,056 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,195 |
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
2.18 |
% |
|
1.37 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (6) |
|
|
24,841 |
|
|
18,128 |
|
|
18,174 |
|
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
688 |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
2.75 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
144,964 |
|
$ |
112,470 |
|
$ |
104,230 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,809 |
|
$ |
2,742 |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
2.44 |
% |
|
1.61 |
% |
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
215,192 |
|
$ |
180,167 |
|
$ |
161,700 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,596 |
|
$ |
6,756 |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
3.75 |
% |
|
2.74 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (6) |
|
|
29,932 |
|
|
31,843 |
|
|
26,650 |
|
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
3.48 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
245,124 |
|
$ |
212,010 |
|
$ |
188,350 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,910 |
|
$ |
7,908 |
|
$ |
5,357 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
3.73 |
% |
|
2.84 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
1,342,501 |
|
$ |
1,150,931 |
|
$ |
1,039,217 |
|
|
|
$ |
56,943 |
|
$ |
36,676 |
|
$ |
22,004 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
3.19 |
% |
|
2.12 |
% |
Demand deposits in U.S. offices |
|
|
10,994 |
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-interest bearing liabilities (8) |
|
|
210,484 |
|
|
180,070 |
|
|
179,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
46,011 |
|
|
87,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,563,979 |
|
$ |
1,387,062 |
|
$ |
1,315,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (10) |
|
$ |
115,566 |
|
$ |
111,076 |
|
$ |
101,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,679,545 |
|
$ |
1,498,138 |
|
$ |
1,416,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets (11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
893,879 |
|
$ |
769,148 |
|
$ |
679,929 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,391 |
|
$ |
21,386 |
|
$ |
25,244 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
2.78 |
% |
|
3.71 |
% |
In offices outside the U.S. (6) |
|
|
594,258 |
|
|
512,116 |
|
|
464,490 |
|
|
|
|
20,097 |
|
|
17,854 |
|
|
16,373 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
3.52 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,488,137 |
|
$ |
1,281,264 |
|
$ |
1,144,419 |
|
|
|
$ |
39,488 |
|
$ |
39,240 |
|
$ |
41,617 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
3.06 |
% |
|
3.64 |
% |
(1) |
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $98 million, $158 million, and $150 million for 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively. |
(2) |
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements on page 148. |
(3) |
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable. |
(4) |
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118. |
(5) |
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. |
(6) |
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries. |
(7) |
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 and interest expense excludes the impact of FIN 41. |
(8) |
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities. |
(9) |
Interest expense on trading account liabilities of CIB is reported as a reduction of interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in
trading account assets and trading account liabilities, respectively. |
(10) |
Includes stockholders equity from discontinued operations. |
(11) |
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset. |
Reclassified |
to conform to the current periods presentation. |
83
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE (1) (2) (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005 |
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to change in: |
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to change in: |
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Average Volume |
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Net Change (2) |
|
Average Volume |
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Net Change (2) |
Deposits with banks (4) |
|
$ |
183 |
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
562 |
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
$ |
669 |
|
$ |
3,393 |
|
|
$ |
4,062 |
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
420 |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
706 |
Total |
|
$ |
982 |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
$ |
4,409 |
|
$ |
694 |
|
$ |
4,074 |
|
|
$ |
4,768 |
Trading account assets (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
$ |
1,459 |
|
|
$ |
2,859 |
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
658 |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
298 |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
425 |
Total |
|
$ |
2,058 |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
$ |
1,361 |
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
1,668 |
Investments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
$ |
1,031 |
|
|
$ |
2,356 |
|
$ |
284 |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
551 |
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
873 |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
705 |
|
|
337 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
584 |
Total |
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
3,061 |
|
$ |
621 |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
1,135 |
Loansconsumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
2,898 |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
3,598 |
|
$ |
1,872 |
|
$ |
(989 |
) |
|
$ |
883 |
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
902 |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
535 |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
Total |
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
4,133 |
|
$ |
3,296 |
|
$ |
(825 |
) |
|
$ |
2,471 |
Loanscorporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
592 |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
$ |
186 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
649 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
662 |
Total |
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,806 |
|
$ |
835 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
878 |
Total loans |
|
$ |
6,112 |
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
7,939 |
|
$ |
4,131 |
|
$ |
(782 |
) |
|
$ |
3,349 |
Other interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
51 |
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
Total interest revenue |
|
$ |
11,584 |
|
$ |
8,931 |
|
|
$ |
20,515 |
|
$ |
7,013 |
|
$ |
5,282 |
|
|
$ |
12,295 |
(1) |
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%, and is excluded from this presentation. |
(2) |
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change. |
(3) |
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118. |
(4) |
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries. |
(5) |
Interest expense on trading account liabilities of CIB is reported as a reduction of interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in
trading account assets and trading account liabilities, respectively. |
84
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE (1) (2) (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to change in: |
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Average Volume |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Net Change (2) |
|
|
Average Volume |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Net Change (2) |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
1,438 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
|
$ |
5,758 |
|
|
$ |
8,155 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
|
$ |
4,712 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
1,023 |
|
|
$ |
3,097 |
|
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
|
$ |
694 |
|
|
$ |
3,990 |
|
|
$ |
4,684 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
5,057 |
|
|
$ |
5,981 |
|
Trading account liabilities (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
1,474 |
|
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
2,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
|
$ |
2,327 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. (4) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
|
$ |
2,603 |
|
|
$ |
4,002 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
|
$ |
2,551 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
7,124 |
|
|
$ |
13,143 |
|
|
$ |
20,267 |
|
|
$ |
2,832 |
|
|
$ |
11,840 |
|
|
$ |
14,672 |
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
4,460 |
|
|
$ |
(4,212 |
) |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
(6,558 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,377 |
) |
(1) |
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%, and is excluded from this presentation. |
(2) |
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change. |
(3) |
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 118. |
(4) |
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries. |
(5) |
Interest expense on trading account liabilities of CIB is reported as a reduction of interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in
trading account assets and trading account liabilities, respectively. |
85
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Capital
is generated principally via earnings, issuance of common and preferred stock and subordinated debt, and equity issued as a result of employee benefit plans. It is used primarily to support asset growth in the Companys businesses. Excess
capital is used to pay dividends to shareholders, repurchase stock, and fund acquisitions.
Citigroups capital management framework is
designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the Companys risk profile, all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, and external rating agency considerations. The capital
management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is frequently reviewed at the entity and country level.
Senior management
oversees the capital management process of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through Citigroups Global Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO). This Committee includes Citigroups Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury, Senior Risk Officer, the business segment CEOs, and other senior managers. The Committees responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and
its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; monitoring interest rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity, and the impact of
currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital; and reviewing and recommending share repurchase levels and dividends on preferred and common stock. The FinALCO has established capital targets for Citigroup and for significant subsidiaries.
These targets exceed the regulatory standards.
Capital Ratios
Citigroup is subject to risk-based capital ratio guidelines issued by the FRB. Capital adequacy is measured via two risk-based ratios, Tier 1 and Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital). Tier 1 Capital is considered core capital while
Total Capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and loan loss reserves. Both measures of capital are stated as a percent of risk-adjusted assets. Risk-adjusted assets are measured primarily on their perceived credit risk and
include certain off-balance sheet exposures, such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and the notional amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts. Citigroup is also subject to the Leverage Ratio requirement, a non-risk-based
asset ratio, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of adjusted average assets.
To be well capitalized under
federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital Ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage Ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to an FRB directive to maintain higher
capital levels.
Historically, Citigroup has maintained a Leverage Ratio above 5%. As Citigroup adds low risk-weighted, secured financing
assets in the CIB business, the Leverage Ratio at the holding company level is expected to decline below 5%, but remain above 4%. The Leverage Ratio at each of the regulated U.S. banks is not expected to decline below 5%. The addition of these
assets is not expected to materially affect any of Citigroups risk-based capital ratios. These statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking
Statements on page 97.
As noted in the following table, Citigroup maintained a well capitalized position during both 2006 and 2005.
Citigroup Regulatory Capital
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Tier 1 Capital (1) |
|
8.59 |
% |
|
8.79 |
% |
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) (1) |
|
11.65 |
|
|
12.02 |
|
Leverage (1)(2) |
|
5.16 |
|
|
5.35 |
|
(1) |
|
The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS
158), at December 31, 2006. |
(2) |
|
Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted average assets. |
Components of Capital Under Regulatory
Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
118,783 |
|
|
$ |
111,412 |
|
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts |
|
|
9,579 |
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Less: Net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale (1) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
Less: Accumulated net losses/(gains) on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(612 |
) |
Less: Minimum pension liability losses, net of tax (2) |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(33,415 |
) |
|
|
(33,130 |
) |
Other disallowed intangible assets |
|
|
(6,127 |
) |
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Total Tier 1 Capital |
|
$ |
90,899 |
|
|
$ |
77,824 |
|
Tier 2 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses (3) |
|
$ |
10,034 |
|
|
$ |
10,602 |
|
Qualifying debt (4) |
|
|
21,891 |
|
|
|
17,368 |
|
Unrealized marketable equity securities gains (1) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Total Tier 2 Capital |
|
$ |
32,361 |
|
|
$ |
28,578 |
|
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) |
|
$ |
123,260 |
|
|
$ |
106,402 |
|
Risk-Adjusted Assets (5) |
|
$ |
1,057,872 |
|
|
$ |
885,472 |
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 Capital excludes unrealized gains and losses on debt securities available-for-sale in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. The federal bank regulatory agencies
permit institutions to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of pretax net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Institutions are required to deduct from Tier 1 Capital net
unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. |
(2) |
|
The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006. |
(3) |
|
Includable up to 1.25% of risk-adjusted assets. Any excess allowance is deducted from risk-adjusted assets. |
(4) |
|
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital. |
(5) |
|
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $77.1 billion for interest rate, commodity and equity derivative contracts and
foreign-exchange contracts as of December 31, 2006, compared with $56.5 billion as of December 31, 2005. Market risk-equivalent assets included in risk-adjusted assets amounted to $40.1 billion and $40.6 billion at December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. Risk-adjusted assets also include the effect of other off-balance sheet exposures, such as unused loan commitments and letters of credit, and reflects deductions for certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for
credit losses. |
86
Common Equity
Common stockholders equity increased approximately $7.4
billion during the year to $118.8 billion at December 31, 2006, representing 6.3% of assets. This compares to $111.4 billion and 7.5% at year-end 2005.
The table below summarizes the change in common stockholders equity during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
|
|
Common Equity, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
111.4 |
|
Net income |
|
|
21.5 |
|
Employee benefit plans and other activities |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
After-tax net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Common Equity, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
118.8 |
|
The decrease in the common stockholders equity ratio during 2006 reflected the above items and a 26.1% increase in total assets.
Additionally, on February 15, 2006, Citigroup redeemed for cash all the outstanding shares of its Fixed/Adjustable Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series V. The redemption price was $50.00 per depositary share, plus accrued dividends to the date of redemption. At the date of redemption, the value of the Series V Preferred Stock was $125 million.
On April 17, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. As of December 31, 2006, $7.4 billion
remained under authorized repurchase programs after the repurchase of $7.0 billion and $12.8 billion in shares during 2006 and 2005, respectively. For further details, see Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds on
page 174.
On February 15, 2006, Citigroup redeemed for cash all outstanding shares of its Fixed/Adjustable Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series V. The redemption price was $50.00 per depositary share, plus accrued dividends to the date of redemption.
The table below
summarizes the Companys repurchase activity during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share amounts |
|
Total Common Shares Repurchased |
|
Dollar Value of Shares Repurchased |
|
Average Price Paid per Share |
|
Dollar Value of Remaining Authorized Repurchase Program |
|
First quarter 2006 |
|
42.9 |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
$ |
46.58 |
|
$ |
2,412 |
|
Second quarter 2006 |
|
40.8 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
48.98 |
|
|
10,412 |
(1) |
Third quarter 2006 |
|
40.9 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
48.90 |
|
|
8,412 |
|
Fourth quarter 2006 |
|
19.4 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
51.66 |
|
|
7,412 |
|
Total 2006 |
|
144.0 |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
$ |
48.60 |
|
$ |
7,412 |
|
Total 2005 |
|
277.9 |
|
$ |
12,794 |
|
$ |
46.03 |
|
$ |
4,412 |
|
(1) |
On April 17, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. |
Mandatorily Redeemable Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
Total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts (trust preferred securities), which qualify as Tier 1 Capital, were $9.579 billion at
December 31, 2006, as compared to $6.264 billion at December 31, 2005. In 2006, Citigroup issued $1.600 billion, $1.185 billion, and $565 million of Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities through Citigroup Capital XVI, Citigroup Capital XV,
and Citigroup Capital XIV, respectively. On December 8, 2006, Citigroup redeemed for cash all of the $25 million Trust Preferred Securities of Adam Capital Trust I, at the redemption price of $1,000 per preferred security plus any accrued
distribution up to, but excluding, the date of redemption. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 139 for details on Citigroup Capital XIV, Citigroup Capital XV, and Citigroup Capital XVI.
On February 15, 2007, Citigroup redeemed for cash all of the $300 million Trust Preferred Securities of Citicorp Capital I, $450 million of Citicorp
Capital II, and $400 million of Citigroup Capital II, at the redemption price of $1,000 per preferred security plus any accrued distribution up to, but excluding, the date of redemption.
The FRB has issued a final rule, with an
effective date of April 11, 2005, which retains trust preferred securities in Tier 1 Capital of Bank Holding Companies (BHCs), but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards. Under the rule, after a five-year transition
period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements included in Tier 1 Capital of internationally active banking organizations, such as Citigroup, would be limited to 15% of Tier 1 Capital elements, net of
goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2 Capital, subject to restrictions. Under this rule, Citigroup currently would
have less than 13% against the limit. The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006.
The FRB and the FFIEC may propose amendments to, and issue interpretations of, risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions. These may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-adjusted assets.*
* |
This is a forward-looking statement within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97. |
87
Capital Resources of Citigroups Depository Institutions
Bank
Consolidation Project: During 2006, Citigroup began and completed the majority of its bank consolidation project, which called for the merger of its twelve U.S.-insured depository institutions into four, as well as the reorganization of its U.S.
mortgage banking business. The first phase of this project was completed in July 2006, when CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, transferred its ownership of Citicorp Trust Bank, fsb to Citigroup. The
second phase occurred in October 2006, when Citigroup reduced its overall number of U.S.-insured depository institutions from twelve to five. Also during this phase, Citibank, N.A. transferred its investment in Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (the
Companys primary banking entity responsible for U.S. credit card activities) to Citigroup. In addition, a majority of the Companys U.S. consumer mortgage lending activity was consolidated within Citibank, N.A. as Citibank (West), FSB,
Citibank Texas, N.A., Citibank, FSB and Citibank Delaware were merged into Citibank, N.A. The final phase of this consolidation project is expected to be completed at a later date with the merger of Citibank (Banamex USA) into Citibank, N.A.
activities) to Citigroup. In addition, a majority of the Companys U.S. consumer mortgage lending activity was consolidated within Citibank, N.A. as Citibank (West), FSB, Citibank Texas, N.A., Citibank, FSB and Citibank Delaware were merged
into Citibank, N.A. The final phase of this consolidation project is expected to be completed at a later date with the merger of Citibank (Banamex USA) into Citibank, N.A.
Benefits achieved from reducing the number of depository institutions included optimized capital efficiency, enhanced flexibility of operations as a result of Citibank, N.A.s larger capital base, reduced
regulatory complexity and improved customer relationships.
Capital Ratios of Depository Institutions: Citigroups subsidiary
depository institutions in the United States are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the FRBs guidelines. To be well capitalized under
federal bank regulatory agency definitions, Citigroups depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) Ratio of at least 10% and a Leverage Ratio of at least 5%, and not
be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels. At December 31, 2006, all of Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions were well capitalized under the federal regulatory agencies
definitions, including Citigroups primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:
Citibank, N.A. Regulatory Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
At year end |
|
2006 |
|
Tier 1 Capital (1) |
|
8.32 |
% |
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) (1) |
|
12.39 |
|
Leverage (1)(2) |
|
6.09 |
|
(1) |
The U.S. Banking Agencies granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006. |
(2) |
Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted average assets. |
Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital
Under Regulatory Guidelines
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
Tier 1 Capital (1) |
|
$ |
59.9 |
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) (1) |
|
|
89.1 |
(1) |
The U.S. Banking Agencies granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006. |
Citibank, N.A. had net income for 2006 amounting to $9.3 billion. During 2006, Citibank, N.A. paid dividends of $3.0 billion.
During 2006, Citibank, N.A. issued an additional $7.8 billion of subordinated notes that qualify for inclusion in Citibank, N.A.s Tier 2 Capital. Total subordinated notes that were outstanding at
December 31, 2006 and included in Citibank, N.A.s Tier 2 Capital amounted to $23.0 billion.
Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries
The Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries including Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets
Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) are subject to various securities and commodities regulations and capital adequacy requirements of the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate. The Companys U.S. registered
broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the Securities and Exchange Commissions Net Capital Rule, Rule 15c3-1 (the Net Capital Rule) under the Exchange Act.
As a registered broker-dealer, CGMI is subject to the SECs Net Capital Rule. Under the Net Capital Rule, CGMI is required to maintain minimum net capital equal to 2% of aggregate debit items, as defined. Under
NYSE regulations, CGMI may be required to reduce its business if its net capital is less than 4% of aggregate debit items and may also be prohibited from expanding its business or paying cash dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5%
of aggregate debit items. Furthermore, the Net Capital Rule does not permit withdrawal of equity or subordinated capital if the resulting net capital would be less than 5% of aggregate debit items.
During the third quarter of 2006, the SEC granted CGMI approval to compute net capital in accordance with the provisions of Appendix E of the Net Capital
Rule. This methodology allows CGMI to compute market risk capital charges using internal Value-at-Risk models. Under Appendix E, CGMI is also required to hold tentative net capital in excess of $1 billion and net capital in excess of $500 million.
The firm is also required to notify the SEC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $5 billion.
Compliance with the Net
Capital Rule could limit those operations of CGMI that require the intensive use of capital, such as underwriting and trading activities and the financing of customer account balances, and also restrict CGMHIs ability to withdraw capital from
its broker-dealer subsidiaries, which in turn could limit CGMHIs ability to pay dividends and make payments on its debt.
At
December 31, 2006, CGMI had net capital, computed in accordance with the Net Capital Rule, of $8.0 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $7.3 billion.
In addition, certain of the Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or
its equivalent. The Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at December 31, 2006. See further discussions on Capital Requirements on page 169.
Regulatory Capital Standards Developments
Citigroup generally supports the move
to a new set of risk-based regulatory capital standards, published on June 26, 2004 (and subsequently amended in November 2005) by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee), consisting of central banks and bank
supervisors from 13 countries. The international version of the Basel II framework will allow
88
Citigroup to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations. On
September 30, 2005, the U.S. banking regulators delayed the U.S. implementation of Basel II by one year. The current U.S. implementation timetable consists of parallel calculations under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel
II, starting January 1, 2008, and an implementation transition period, starting January 1, 2009 through year-end 2011 or possibly later. The U.S. regulators have also reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S., and
retain the existing Prompt Corrective Action and leverage capital requirements applicable to U.S. banking organizations. The new timetable, clarifications, and other proposals are set forth in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) issued on
September 25, 2006, which contains a number of material differences from the international version of Basel II.
Citigroup continues to
monitor, analyze and comment on the developing capital standards in the U.S. and in countries where Citigroup has significant presence, in order to assess their collective impact and allocate project management and funding resources accordingly.
LIQUIDITY
Overview
At the Holding
Company level for Citigroup, for CGMHI, and for the Combined Holding Company and CGMHI, Citigroup maintains sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon without accessing the unsecured
markets.
Management of Liquidity
Management of liquidity at
Citigroup is the responsibility of the Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury. A uniform liquidity risk management policy exists for Citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries. Under this policy, there is a single set of standards for the
measurement of liquidity risk in order to ensure consistency across businesses, stability in methodologies and transparency of risk. Management of liquidity at each operating subsidiary and/or country is performed on a daily basis and is monitored
by Corporate Treasury and independent risk management.
The basis of Citigroups liquidity management is strong decentralized liquidity
management at each of its principal operating subsidiaries and in each of its countries, combined with an active corporate oversight function. As discussed in Capital Resources and Liquidity on page 86, Citigroups FinALCO
undertakes this oversight responsibility, along with the Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury. One of the objectives of the FinALCO is to monitor and review the overall liquidity and balance sheet positions of Citigroup and its principal
subsidiaries. Similarly, Asset and Liability Committees are also established for each country and/or major line of business.
Monitoring Liquidity
Each principal operating subsidiary and/or country must prepare an annual funding and liquidity plan for review by the Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury and
approval by independent risk management. The funding and liquidity plan includes analysis of the balance sheet, as well as the economic and business conditions impacting the liquidity of the major operating subsidiary and/or country. As part of the
funding and liquidity plan, liquidity limits, liquidity ratios, market triggers, and assumptions for periodic stress tests are established and approved.
Liquidity Limits
Liquidity limits establish boundaries for market access in business-as-usual conditions and are monitored against the liquidity position on a daily
basis. These limits are established based on the size of the balance sheet, depth of the market, experience level of local management, stability of the liabilities, and liquidity of the assets. Finally, the limits are subject to the evaluation of
the entities stress test results. Generally, limits are established such that in stress scenarios, entities are self-funded or net providers of liquidity.
Liquidity Ratios
A series of standard corporate-wide liquidity ratios have been established to monitor the structural elements of
Citigroups liquidity. For bank entities, these include cash capital (defined as core deposits, long-term debt, and capital compared with illiquid assets), liquid assets against liquidity gaps, core deposits to loans, long-term assets to
long-term liabilities, and deposits to loans. Several measures exist to review potential concentrations of funding by individual name, product, industry, or geography. At the Holding Company level for Citigroup, for CGMHI and for the Combined
Holding Company and CGMHI, ratios are established for liquid assets against short-term obligations. Triggers for management discussion, which may result in other actions, have been established against these ratios. In addition, each individual major
operating subsidiary or country establishes targets against these ratios and may monitor other ratios as approved in its funding and liquidity plan.
Market Triggers
Market triggers are internal or external market or economic factors that may imply a change to market liquidity or
Citigroups access to the markets. Citigroup market triggers are monitored by the Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury and the Head of Risk Oversight and are discussed in the FinALCO. Appropriate market triggers are also established and
monitored for each major operating subsidiary and/or country as part of the funding and liquidity plans. Local triggers are reviewed with the local country or business ALCO and independent risk management.
Stress Testing
Simulated liquidity stress testing is
periodically performed for each major operating subsidiary and/or country. The scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources, credit ratings, contingent uses of funding, and political and economic conditions in
certain countries. The results of stress tests of individual countries and operating subsidiaries are reviewed to ensure that each individual major operating subsidiary or country is either self-funded or a net provider of liquidity. In addition, a
Contingency Funding Plan is prepared on a periodic basis for Citigroup. The plan includes detailed policies, procedures, roles and responsibilities, and the results of corporate stress tests. The product of these stress tests is a series of
alternatives that can be used by the Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury in a liquidity event.
CGMHI monitors liquidity by tracking
asset levels, collateral and funding availability to maintain flexibility to meet its financial commitments. As a policy, CGMHI attempts to maintain sufficient capital and funding sources in order to have the capacity to finance itself on a fully
collateralized basis in the event that its access to uncollateralized financing is temporarily impaired. This is documented in CGMHIs contingency funding plan. This plan is reviewed periodically to keep the funding options current and in line
with market conditions. The management of this plan includes an analysis used to determine CGMHIs ability to withstand varying levels of stress,
89
including rating downgrades, which could impact its liquidation horizons and required margins. CGMHI maintains liquidity reserves of cash and loan value of
unencumbered securities in excess of its outstanding short-term uncollateralized liabilities. This is monitored on a daily basis. CGMHI also ensures that long-term illiquid assets are funded with long-term liabilities.
FUNDING
Overview
As a financial
holding company, substantially all of Citigroups net earnings are generated within its operating subsidiaries. These subsidiaries make funds available to Citigroup, primarily in the form of dividends. Certain subsidiaries dividend paying
abilities may be limited by covenant restrictions in credit agreements, regulatory requirements and/or rating agency requirements that also impact their capitalization levels.
Banking Subsidiaries
There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions
to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its nonbank subsidiaries. The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of
federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agencys regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by
applicable state law.
As of December 31, 2006, Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions can declare dividends to their
parent companies, without regulatory approval, of approximately $17.7 billion. In determining the dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and Leverage Ratio requirements, as well as
policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Consistent with these considerations, Citigroup estimates that, as of December 31,
2006, its subsidiary depository institutions can distribute dividends to Citigroup of approximately $11.0 billion of the available $17.7 billion.
Non-Banking
Subsidiaries
Citigroup also receives dividends from its nonbank subsidiaries. These nonbank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory
restrictions on dividends.
As discussed in Capital Resources and Liquidity on page 86, the ability of CGMHI to declare
dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.
During 2007, it is not anticipated that any
restrictions on the subsidiaries dividending capability will restrict Citigroups ability to meet its obligations as and when they become due.*
Sources
of Liquidity
Primary sources of liquidity for Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include:
|
|
collateralized financing transactions; |
|
|
senior and subordinated debt; |
|
|
trust preferred securities; and |
|
|
purchased/wholesale funds. |
Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries also
generate funds through securitizing financial assets, including credit card receivables and single-family or multi-family residences. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143 for additional information about securitization
activities. Finally, Citigroups net earnings provide a significant source of funding to the corporation.
Citigroups funding
sources are well diversified across funding types and geography, a benefit of the strength of the global franchise. Funding for the parent and its major operating subsidiaries includes a large geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base
of $712.0 billion. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is expected to be, long-term and stable and is considered core.
Citigroup and its subsidiaries have a significant presence in the global capital markets. During the 2005 second quarter, Citigroup consolidated its capital markets funding activities into two legal entities: (i) Citigroup Inc., which
issues long-term debt, medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, and preferred and common stock; and (ii) Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI), a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium- term notes and structured
equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup. As part of the funding consolidation, Citigroup also guaranteed and continues to guarantee various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt
obligations under CGMHIs publicly-issued securities.
In August 2005, Citigroup merged its two intermediate bank holding companies,
Citigroup Holdings Company and Citicorp, into Citigroup Inc. Coincident with this merger, Citigroup assumed all existing indebtedness and outstanding guarantees of Citicorp. As a result, Citigroup also guaranteed various debt obligations of
Associates and of CitiFinancial Credit Company, each an indirect subsidiary of Citigroup. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to
issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. See Note 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 156 for further discussions. Other significant elements of long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet include
collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank system, asset-backed outstandings, and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries.
CGMHIs consolidated balance sheet is highly liquid, with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions. The highly liquid
nature of these assets provides CGMHI with flexibility in financing and managing its business. CGMHI monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity, and to ensure that its capital base
supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries.
Citigroup uses its liquidity to service debt obligations, to pay
dividends to its stockholders, to support organic growth, to fund acquisitions and to repurchase its shares, pursuant to Board of Directors approved plans.
Each of Citigroups major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization, regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates. Particular attention is paid
to those businesses that for tax, sovereign risk, or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets.
* |
This is a forward-looking statement within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97. |
90
Citigroups borrowings are diversified by geography, investor, instrument and currency. Decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate
profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative financial products.
At December 31, 2006, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup Parent Company, CGMHI, Citigroup Funding Inc. and Citigroups Subsidiaries were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
Citigroup Parent Company |
|
CGMHI |
|
Citigroup Funding Inc. |
|
Other Citigroup Subsidiaries |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
125.4 |
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
$ |
115.6 |
(1) |
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
(1) |
At December 31, 2006, approximately $81.5 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. |
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 139 for further detail on long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.
Citigroups ability to access the capital markets and other sources of wholesale funds, as well as the cost of these funds, is highly dependent on
its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup.
Citigroups Debt Ratings as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Inc. |
|
|
|
Citigroup Funding Inc. |
|
|
|
Citibank, N.A. |
|
|
Senior debt |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
Senior debt |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
Long- term |
|
Short- term |
Fitch Ratings |
|
AA+ |
|
AA |
|
F1+ |
|
|
|
AA+ |
|
AA |
|
F1+ |
|
|
|
AA+ |
|
F1+ |
Moodys Investors Service |
|
Aa1 |
|
Aa2 |
|
P-1 |
|
|
|
Aa1 |
|
Aa2 |
|
P-1 |
|
|
|
Aaa |
|
P-1 |
Standard & Poors |
|
AA- |
|
A+ |
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
AA- |
|
A+ |
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
AA |
|
A-1+ |
On February 14, 2007, Standard & Poors upgraded the ratings of Citigroup and certain rated subsidiaries. The senior debt ratings of
Citigroup and Citigroup Funding Inc (CFI) were upgraded to AA from AA-. The subordinated debt ratings of Citigroup and Citigroup Funding Inc (CFI) were upgraded to AA- from A+. The long-term
rating of Citibank, N.A. was upgraded to AA+ from AA. On September 26, 2006, Moodys Investors Service upgraded Citibank, N.A.s long-term rating to Aaa from Aa1. The outlook for
all of Citigroups ratings is stable.
Some of Citigroups nonbank subsidiaries, including CGMHI, have credit
facilities with Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. There are various legal restrictions on
the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its nonbank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them. In general, these restrictions
require that transactions be on arms-length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 139.
Contractual Obligations
The following table includes aggregated information about Citigroups contractual obligations that impact its short- and long-term liquidity and
capital needs. The table includes information about payments due under specified contractual obligations, aggregated by type of contractual obligation. It includes the maturity profile of the Companys consolidated long-term debt, operating
leases and other long-term liabilities. The Companys capital lease obligations are not material and are included within purchase obligations in the table.
Citigroups contractual obligations include purchase obligations that are enforceable and legally binding for the Company. For the purposes of the table below, purchase obligations are included through the
termination date of the respective agreements, even if the contract is renewable. Many of the purchase agreements for goods or services include clauses that would allow the Company to cancel the agreement with specified notice; however, that impact
is not included in the table (unless Citigroup has already notified the counterparty of its intention to terminate the agreement).
Other
liabilities reflected on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet include obligations for goods and services that have already been received, litigation settlements, as well as other long-term liabilities that have been incurred and will
ultimately be paid in cash. Excluded from the following table are obligations that are generally short-term in nature, including deposit liabilities and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The table also excludes certain insurance and
investment contracts subject to mortality and morbidity risks or without defined maturities, such that the timing of payments and withdrawals is uncertain. The liabilities related to these insurance and investment contracts are included on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as Insurance Policy and Claims Reserves, Contractholder Funds, and Separate and Variable Accounts.
91
Citigroups funding policy for pension plans is generally to fund to the minimum amounts required by the applicable laws and regulations. At
December 31, 2006, there were no minimum required contributions, and no contributions are currently planned for the U.S. pension plans. Accordingly, no amounts have been included in the table below for future contributions to the U.S. pension
plans. For the non-U.S. plans, discretionary contributions in 2007 are anticipated to be approximately $123 million and
this amount has been included within purchase obligations in the table below.* The estimated pension plan contributions are subject to change, since
contribution decisions are affected by various factors such as market performance, regulatory and legal requirements, and managements ability to change funding policy. For additional information regarding the Companys retirement benefit
obligations, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 124.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations by Year |
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Thereafter |
Long-term debt obligations (1) |
|
$ |
38,519 |
|
$ |
49,212 |
|
$ |
56,168 |
|
$ |
24,563 |
|
$ |
31,662 |
|
$ |
88,370 |
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
976 |
|
|
832 |
|
|
4,552 |
Purchase obligations |
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
686 |
|
|
454 |
|
|
433 |
|
|
625 |
Business acquisitions |
|
|
7,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities reflected on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet (2) |
|
|
49,612 |
|
|
166 |
|
|
142 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
118 |
|
|
864 |
Total |
|
$ |
102,174 |
|
$ |
51,867 |
|
$ |
58,143 |
|
$ |
26,136 |
|
$ |
33,045 |
|
$ |
94,411 |
(1) |
For additional information about long-term debt and trust preferred securities, see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 139. |
(2) |
Relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included within Other Liabilities in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet. Also included are various litigation
settlements. |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Overview
Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), lines and letters of credit, and loan commitments.
The securitization process enhances the liquidity of the financial markets, may spread credit risk among several market participants, and makes new funds
available to extend credit to consumers and commercial entities.
Uses of SPEs
In order to execute securitizations, the Company uses SPEs. An SPE is an entity in the form of a trust or other legal vehicle designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it.
The principal uses of SPEs are to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroups financial assets, to
assist clients in securitizing their financial assets, and to create investment products for clients. SPEs may be organized as trusts, partnerships, or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts those
assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPEs issuing debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper, and other notes of indebtedness. Investors usually have recourse to
the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or overcollateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, or from a liquidity facility, such as a line of credit or asset purchase
agreement. Accordingly, the SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs. The SPE may also enter into derivative
contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors, or to limit or
change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the counterparty to these derivatives.
SPEs may be Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or variable interest entities (VIEs) or neither. A VIE is a type of SPE that does not have sufficient equity to
finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from third parties. Its investors may not have the power to make significant decisions about the entitys operations, or investors may not share pro rata in the
entitys expected returns or losses. The Companys credit card receivable and mortgage loan securitizations are organized as QSPEs and are, therefore, not VIEs subject to FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (revised December 2003), (FIN 46-R). When an entity is deemed a VIE under FIN 46-R, the entity in question must be consolidated by the primary beneficiary; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of most of
these entities and as such does not consolidate most of them.
Securitization of Citigroups Assets
In some of these off-balance sheet arrangements, including credit card receivable and mortgage loan securitizations, Citigroup is securitizing assets that were previously
recorded on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. A summary of certain cash flows received from and paid to securitization trusts is included in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143.
Credit Card Receivables
Credit card receivables are securitized through trusts,
which are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup sells receivables into the trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash
proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. CGMI is one of several underwriters that distribute securities issued by the trusts to investors. The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant
portion of its managed U.S. Cards business, which includes both on-balance sheet and securitized receivables.
* |
This is a forward-looking statement within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 97.
|
92
The following table reflects amounts related to the Companys securitized credit card receivables at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts |
|
$ |
112.4 |
|
$ |
107.7 |
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities |
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
92.1 |
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
4.0 |
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interest recorded as consumer loans |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
11.6 |
Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables |
|
$ |
112.4 |
|
$ |
107.7 |
Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts receivable from trusts |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
Amounts payable to trusts |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
1.6 |
Residual interest retained in trust cash flows |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.1 |
The Company recorded net gains from securitization of credit card receivables of $1.0 billion and
$1.0 billion during 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net gains reflect the following:
|
|
incremental gains from new securitizations |
|
|
the reversal of the allowance for loan losses associated with receivables sold |
|
|
net gains on replenishments of the trust assets |
|
|
offset by other-than-temporary impairments. |
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143 for additional information regarding the Companys securitization activities.
Mortgages and Other Assets
The Company provides a wide range of mortgage and other loan products to its customers. In addition to providing
a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Companys credit exposure to the borrowers. The Companys mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively
transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. In addition to servicing rights, the Company also retains a residual interest in its student loan and other asset securitizations, consisting of
securities and interest-only strips that arise from the calculation of gain or loss at the time assets are sold to the SPE. The Company recognized gains related to the securitization of mortgages and other assets of $388 million and $323 million in
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Securitization of Client Assets
The
Company acts as an intermediary for its corporate clients, assisting them in obtaining liquidity by selling their trade receivables or other financial assets to an SPE.
In addition, Citigroup administers several third-party-owned, special purpose, multi-seller finance companies that purchase pools of trade receivables, credit card receivables, and other financial assets from its
clients. As administrator, the Company provides accounting, funding, and operations services to these conduits but has no ownership interest. Generally, the clients continue to service the transferred assets. The conduits asset purchases are
funded by issuing commercial paper and medium-term notes. Clients absorb the first losses of the conduits by providing collateral in
the form of excess assets or holding a residual interest. The Company, along with other financial institutions, provides liquidity facilities, such as
commercial paper backstop lines of credit to the conduits. The Company also provides loss enhancement in the form of letters of credit and other guarantees. All fees are charged on a market basis. During 2003 many of the conduits issued first
loss subordinated notes to third-party investors so that such investors in each conduit would be deemed the primary beneficiary under FIN 46-R, and would consolidate that conduit.
At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, total assets and liabilities in the unconsolidated conduits were $66 billion and $55 billion,
respectively.
Creation of Other Investment and Financing Products
In addition to securitizations of mortgage loans originated by the Company, the Company also securitizes purchased mortgage loans, creating collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and other mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) and
distributes them to investors. In 2006 and 2005, respectively, the Company organized 33 and 36 mortgage securitizations with assets of $24 billion and $25 billion. For 2006 and 2005, the Companys revenues for these activities were $758 million
and $483 million, respectively, and estimated expenses before taxes were $151 million and $116 million. Expenses have been estimated based upon a percentage of product revenues to total business revenues.
The Company packages and securitizes assets purchased in the financial markets in order to create new security offerings, including arbitrage
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and synthetic CDOs for institutional clients and retail customers, which match the clients investment needs and preferences. Typically these instruments diversify investors risk to a pool of assets
as compared with investments in individual assets. The VIEs, which are issuers of CDO securities, are generally organized as limited liability corporations. The Company typically receives fees for structuring and/or distributing the securities sold
to investors. In some cases, the Company may repackage the investment with higher-rated debt CDO securities or U.S. Treasury securities to provide a greater or a very high degree of certainty of the return of invested principal. A third-party
manager is typically retained by the VIE to select collateral for inclusion in the pool and then actively manage it, or, in other cases, only to manage work-out credits. The Company may also provide other financial services and/or products to the
VIEs for market-rate fees. These may include: the provision of liquidity or contingent liquidity facilities, interest rate or foreign exchange hedges and credit derivative instruments, as well as the purchasing and warehousing of securities until
they are sold to the SPE. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs under FIN 46-R due to its limited continuing involvement and, as a result, we do not consolidate their assets and liabilities in our financial statements.
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143 for additional information about off-balance sheet arrangements.
93
Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit
The table below summarizes
Citigroups credit commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Financial standby letters of credit and foreign office guarantees |
|
$ |
72,548 |
|
$ |
52,384 |
Performance standby letters of credit and foreign office guarantees |
|
|
15,802 |
|
|
13,946 |
Commercial and similar letters of credit |
|
|
7,861 |
|
|
5,790 |
One- to four-family residential mortgages |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
3,343 |
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties |
|
|
32,449 |
|
|
25,089 |
Commercial real estate, construction and land development |
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
2,283 |
Credit card lines (1) |
|
|
987,409 |
|
|
859,504 |
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments (2) |
|
|
439,931 |
|
|
346,444 |
Total |
|
$ |
1,563,464 |
|
$ |
1,308,783 |
(1) |
Credit card lines are unconditionally cancelable by the issuer. |
(2) |
Includes commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities. Amounts include $251 billion
and $179 billion with original maturity of less than one year at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
See Note 26
to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 151 for additional information on credit commitments and lines of credit.
U.S. CONSUMER MORTGAGE LENDING
The following charts present the characteristics of Citigroups first and second U.S.
mortgage loan portfolio as of December 31, 2006:
Interest Rate Risk Associated with
Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity
Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest
rate risks. To manage credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The fair value
of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. Thus, by retaining the servicing rights of sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is still exposed to interest rate risk.
In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward
purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as available-for-sale or trading (primarily fixed income debt, such as U.S. government and agencies obligations, and mortgage-backed securities including
principal-only strips).
Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the
MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as basis risk. Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the portion of the MSRs that were hedged with instruments qualifying for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 was recorded at
fair value. The remaining portion of the MSRs, which was hedged with instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 or were unhedged, were accounted for at the lower-of-cost-or-market. With the adoption of SFAS 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS 156) as of January 1, 2006, the Company records all MSRs at fair value.
Citigroups MSRs totaled $5.439 billion and $4.339 billion, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For additional information about the Companys MSRs, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143.
As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at
specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days after the rate has been set. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans-held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as
derivatives under SFAS 133. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the likelihood that the commitment
will be funded. However, a value is not assigned to the MSRs until after the loans have been funded and sold.
Citigroup hedges its exposure
to the change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.
94
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT PLANS
The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The U.S. defined benefit plan provides benefits under a cash balance formula. Employees satisfying
certain age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final pay formula. The Company also offers postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible employees
outside the United States.
The following table shows the pension expense and contributions for Citigroups plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Pension expense (1) |
|
$ |
182 |
|
$ |
237 |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
$ |
182 |
|
$ |
185 |
Company contributions (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
379 |
|
|
524 |
(1) |
The 2006 expense for the U.S. plans includes an $80 million curtailment gain recognized as of September 30, 2006 relating to the Companys decision to freeze benefit accruals for all
cash balance participants after 2007. |
(2) |
In addition, the Company absorbed $20 million, $19 million and $18 million during 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, relating to certain investment management fees and administration costs
for the U.S. plans, which are excluded from this table. |
The following table shows the combined postretirement expense and
contributions for Citigroups U.S. and foreign plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. and Non-U.S. Plans |
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Postretirement expense |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
75 |
Company contributions |
|
|
260 |
|
|
226 |
|
|
216 |
Expected Rate of Return
Upon the adoption of SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006, the Company recorded an after-tax charge to equity of $1.647 billion, which corresponds to the plans net pension liability and the write-off of the existing prepaid asset, which
relates to unamortized actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs/benefits and transition assets/liabilities.
Citigroup determines its
assumptions for the expected rate of return on plan assets for its U.S. pension and postretirement plans using a building block approach, which focuses on ranges of anticipated rates of return for each asset class. A weighted range of
nominal rates is then determined based on target allocations to each asset class. Citigroup considers the expected rate of return to be a long-term assessment of return expectations and does not anticipate changing this assumption annually unless
there are significant changes in investment strategy or economic conditions. This contrasts with the selection of the discount rate, future compensation increase rate, and certain other assumptions, which are reconsidered annually in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
The expected rate of return was 8.0% at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, reflecting the performance of the global capital markets. Actual returns in 2006, 2005 and 2004 were more than the expected returns. The
expected returns impacted pretax earnings by 2.9%, 2.7% and 3.3%, respectively. This expected amount reflects the expected annual appreciation of the plan assets and reduces the obligation of the Company. It is deducted from the service cost,
interest and other components of pension expense to arrive at the net pension expense. Net pension expense for 2006, 2005 and 2004 reflects deductions of $845 million, $806 million and $750 million of expected returns, respectively.
The following table shows the expected versus actual rate of return on plan assets for the U.S. pension and postretirement plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Expected rate of return |
|
8.0 |
% |
|
8.0 |
% |
|
8.0 |
% |
Actual rate of return |
|
14.7 |
% |
|
9.7 |
% |
|
11.5 |
% |
For the foreign plans, pension expense for 2006 was reduced by the expected return of $384 million,
which impacted pretax earnings by 1.3%. Pension expense for 2005 and 2004 was reduced by expected returns of $315 million and $251 million, respectively. Actual returns were higher in 2006, 2005 and 2004 than the expected returns in those years.
Discount Rate
The 2006 discount rates for the U.S. pension and
postretirement plans were selected by reference to a Citigroup-specific analysis using each plans specific cash flows and compared with the Moodys Aa Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield for reasonableness. As of September 30, 2006, the U.S.
pension plan was remeasured to reflect the freeze of benefits accruals for all non-grandfathered participants, effective January 1, 2008. Under the September 30th remeasurement and year-end analysis, the resulting plan-specific discount rate
for the pension plan was 5.86%. Citigroups policy is to round to the nearest tenth of a percent. Accordingly, at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006, the discount rate was set at 5.9% for the pension plans and, as of December 31,
2006, the discount rate was set at 5.7% for the postretirement welfare plans.
At December 31, 2005, the Moodys Aa Long-Term
Corporate Bond Yield was 5.63% and the discount rate was set at 5.6% for the pension plans and 5.5% for the postretirement plans, rounding to the nearest tenth of a percent, after giving consideration to a Citigroup-specific cash flow analysis.
The discount rates for the foreign pension and postretirement plans are selected by reference to high-quality corporate bond rates in
countries that have developed corporate bond markets. However, where developed corporate bond markets do not exist, the discount rates are selected by reference to local government bond rates with a premium added to reflect the additional risk for
corporate bonds.
For additional information on the pension and postretirement plans, and on discount rates used in determining pension and
postretirement benefit obligations and net benefit expense for the Companys plans, as well as the effects of a one percentage-point change in the expected rates of return and the discount rates, see Note 9 to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements on page 124.
95
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Corporate Governance
Citigroup has a Code of Conduct that maintains the Companys commitment to the highest standards of conduct. The Company has established an ethics hotline for
employees. The Code of Conduct is supplemented by a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals (including finance, accounting, treasury, tax and investor relations professionals) that applies worldwide.
Both the Code of Conduct and the Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals can be found on the Citigroup Web site, www.citigroup.com, by clicking
on the Corporate Governance page. The Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters for the Audit and Risk Management Committee, the Nomination and Governance Committee, the Personnel and Compensation Committee, and the
Public Affairs Committee of the Board are also available under the Corporate Governance page, or by writing to Citigroup Inc., Corporate Governance, 425 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10043.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
The Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act securities laws is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.
The Companys Disclosure Committee is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and
evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Companys external disclosures.
The Companys management, with the
participation of the Companys CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2006 and, based on that
evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Financial Reporting
The Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the CEO and CFO, and effected by Citigroups Board of
Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These controls
include policies and procedures that:
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that the Companys receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Companys management and directors; and |
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements. |
Citigroup has had a longstanding process whereby business and financial
officers throughout the Company attest to the accuracy of financial information reported in corporate systems as well as the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure processes.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006 that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
96
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company
uses certain forward-looking statements when describing future business conditions. The Companys actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements and are indicated by words such as believe,
expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, should,
would, and could.
These forward-looking statements involve external risks and uncertainties including, but not
limited, to those described under Risk Factors on page 58. Other risks and uncertainties disclosed herein include, but are not limited to:
|
|
The Companys ability to manage expenses and allocate capital in a disciplined manner; |
|
|
Whether the Companys investment initiatives, including recent and future targeted acquisitions, will generate a meaningful revenue contribution;
|
|
|
The Companys ability to continue to re-weight its revenue mix towards International Consumer, CIB and Global Wealth Management; |
|
|
The Companys ability to establish a lower-cost platform for the consumer finance business in Japan; |
|
|
The Companys ability to accurately estimate probable losses inherent in the lending portfolio; |
|
|
The Consumer businesses ability to expand their customer base; |
|
|
The ability of U.S. Cards to grow managed receivables; |
|
|
The ability of U.S. Retail Distribution to: generate increases in loans, deposits and accounts; continue to expand its footprint; continue to grow its
Citibank Direct business; and expand cross-marketing opportunities with Primerica Financial Services; |
|
|
The ability of U.S. Consumer Lending to generate earnings growth across its product lines; |
|
|
The ability of U.S. Commercial Business to expand its portfolio through leveraging distribution channels in Smith Barney and the expanded Retail
Branch network; |
|
|
Whether Smith Barney will see continued asset and revenue growth from recent investments in its wealth management platform; |
|
|
The ability of the Private Bank to leverage Citigroups onshore and institutional capabilities to build onshore franchises focused on wealth-creating
individuals in key markets; |
|
|
The impact of a variety of unresolved matters involving some of the portfolio companies in CVC/Brazil; |
|
|
The effect that adding low risk-weighted, secured financing assets in the CIB business will have on Citigroups capital adequacy ratios;
|
|
|
Possible amendments to, and interpretations of, risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions; and |
|
|
The Companys subsidiaries dividending capabilities. |
97
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Accumulated Benefit Obligation (ABO)The actuarial present value of benefits (vested and unvested) attributed to employee services rendered up to the calculation date.
Additional Minimum Liability (AML)Recognition
of an additional minimum liability is required when the ABO exceeds pension plan assets and the liability for accrued pension cost already recognized is insufficient. Upon the adoption of SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006, AMLs are no longer
required to be recognized.
APB 23 BenefitIn
accordance with paragraph 31a of SFAS 109, a deferred tax liability is not recognized for the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of an investment in a foreign subsidiary unless it becomes apparent that the temporary
difference will reverse in the foreseeable future.
Assets Under Management (AUMs)Assets held by Citigroup in a fiduciary capacity for clients. These assets are not included on Citigroups balance sheet.
Bank Deposit ProgramSmith Barneys Bank Deposit Program provides eligible clients with FDIC insurance on their cash
deposits. Accounts enrolled in the program automatically have their cash balances invested, or swept, into interest-bearing, FDIC-insured deposit accounts at Citigroup-affiliated banks.
Cash-Basis FormulaA formula, within a defined benefit plan,
that defines the ultimate benefit as a hypothetical account balance based on annual benefit credits and interest earnings.
Cash-Basis LoansLoans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments are considered impaired and are classified as non-performing or non-accrual assets.
In situations where the lender reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed ultimately will be collected, all payments are credited directly to the outstanding principal.
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs)An investment-grade
security backed by a pool of bonds, loans, or other assets.
Credit Default SwapAn agreement between two parties whereby one party pays the other a fixed coupon over a specified term. The other party makes no payment unless a specified credit event such as a default occurs, at which time a
payment is made and the swap terminates.
Deferred Tax AssetAn asset attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards. A deferred tax asset is measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted tax law.
Deferred Tax LiabilityA liability attributable to taxable
temporary differences. A deferred tax liability is measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted tax law.
Defined Benefit PlanA retirement plan under which the benefits paid are based on a specific formula. The formula is usually a function of age, service
and compensation. A non-contributory plan does not require employee contributions.
DerivativeA contract or agreement whose value is derived from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, prices of securities or commodities, or financial or commodity
indices.
Federal FundsNon-interest-bearing deposits held by member banks at the Federal Reserve Bank.
Foregone InterestInterest on cash-basis loans that would have been earned at the original contractual rate
if the loans were on accrual status.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)Accounting rules and conventions defining acceptable practices in preparing financial statements in the United States of America. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), an independent, self-regulatory
organization, is the primary source of accounting rules.
Interest-Only (or IO) StripA residual interest in securitization trusts representing the remaining value of expected net cash flows to the Company after payments to third party investors and net credit losses.
Leverage RatioThe Leverage Ratio is calculated by dividing
Tier 1 Capital by leverage assets. Leverage assets are defined as quarterly average total assets, net of goodwill, intangibles and certain other items as required by the Federal Reserve.
Managed Average YieldGross managed interest revenue earned, divided by average managed loans.
Managed BasisManaged basis presentation includes results from
both on-balance sheet loans and off-balance sheet loans, and excludes the impact of card securitization activity. Managed basis disclosures assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the result of the securitized loans in the same
manner as the Companys owned loans.
Managed LoansIncludes loans classified as Loans on the balance sheet plus loans held-for-sale that are included in other assets plus securitized receivables. These are primarily credit card receivables.
Managed Net Credit LossesNet credit losses adjusted for the
effect of credit card securitizations. See Managed Loans.
Market-Related Value of Plan
AssetsA balance used to calculate the expected return on pension-plan assets. Market-related value can be either fair value or a calculated value that recognizes changes in fair value in a
systematic and rational manner over not more than five years.
Minority InterestWhen a parent owns a majority (but less than 100%) of a subsidiarys stock, the Consolidated Financial Statements must reflect the minoritys interest in the subsidiary. The minority interest as shown
in the Consolidated Statement of Income is equal to the minoritys proportionate share of the subsidiarys net income and, as included within other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, is equal to the minoritys
proportionate share of the subsidiarys net assets.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
(MSRs)An intangible asset representing servicing rights retained in the securitization of mortgage loans.
Net Credit LossesGross credit losses (write-offs) less gross credit recoveries.
Net Credit Loss RatioAnnualized net credit losses divided by
average loans outstanding.
Net Credit MarginRevenues less net credit losses.
98
Net Excess Spread RevenueNet cash flows from our credit card
securitization activities that are returned to the Company, less the amortization of previously recorded revenue (i.e., residual interest) related to prior periods securitizations. The net cash flows include collections of interest income and
fee revenue in excess of the interest paid to securitization trust investors, reduced by net credit losses, servicing fees, and other costs related to the securitized receivables.
Net Interest Revenue (NIR)Interest revenue less interest expense.
Net Interest MarginInterest revenue less interest expense
divided by average interest-earning assets.
Non-Qualified PlanA retirement plan that is not subject to certain Internal Revenue Code requirements and subsequent regulations. Contributions to non-qualified plans do not receive tax-favored treatment; the employers tax deduction is taken when
the benefits are paid to participants.
Notional AmountThe principal balance of a derivative contract used as a reference to calculate the amount of interest or other payments.
On-Balance Sheet LoansLoans originated or purchased by the Company that reside on the balance sheet at the date of the balance sheet.
Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO)The actuarial present value
of all pension benefits accrued for employee service rendered prior to the calculation date, including an allowance for future salary increases if the pension benefit is based on future compensation levels.
Purchase SalesCustomers credit card purchase sales plus
cash advances.
Qualified PlanA retirement plan
that satisfies certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and provides benefits on a tax-deferred basis. Contributions to qualified plans are tax deductible.
Qualifying SPE (QSPE)A Special Purpose Entity that is very limited in its activities and in the types of assets it can hold. It is
a passive entity and may not engage in active decision making. QSPE status allows the seller to remove assets transferred to the QSPE from its books, achieving sale accounting. QSPEs are not consolidated by the seller or the investors in the QSPE.
Return on AssetsAnnualized income divided by
average assets.
Return on Common EquityAnnualized income less preferred stock dividends, divided by average common equity.
Return on Invested CapitalAnnualized net income, adjusted to exclude the effects of capital charges on goodwill and intangibles, divided by average invested capital, which
consists of risk capital plus goodwill and intangibles.
Return on Risk CapitalAnnualized net income, divided by average risk capital.
Risk
CapitalRisk capital is a management metric defined as the amount of capital required to absorb potential unexpected economic volatility.
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell (Reverse Repo Agreements)An agreement between a seller and a
buyer, generally of government or agency securities, whereby the buyer agrees to purchase the securities and the seller agrees to repurchase them at an agreed-upon price at a future date.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase (Repurchase Agreements)An agreement between a seller and a
buyer, generally of government or agency securities, whereby the seller agrees to repurchase the securities at an agreed-upon price at a future date.
Special Purpose Entity (SPE)An entity in the form of a trust or other legal vehicle, designed to fulfill a specific limited need of
the company that organized it (such as a transfer of risk or desired tax treatment).
Standby Letter
of CreditAn obligation issued by a bank on behalf of a bank customer to a third party where the bank promises to pay the third party, contingent upon the failure by the banks customer to
perform under the terms of the underlying contract with the beneficiary, or it obligates the bank to guarantee or stand as a surety for the benefit of the third party to the extent permitted by law or regulation.
SecuritizationsA process by which a legal entity issues to
investors certain securities which pay a return based on the principal and interest cash flows from a pool of loans or other financial assets.
Tier 1 and Tier 2 CapitalTier 1 Capital includes common stockholders equity (excluding certain components of other comprehensive income),
qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts, and minority interests that are held by others, less certain intangible assets. Tier 2 Capital includes, among other items, perpetual preferred
stock to the extent that it does not qualify for Tier 1, qualifying senior and subordinated debt, limited-life preferred stock, and the allowance for credit losses, subject to certain limitations.
Unearned CompensationThe unamortized portion of a grant to
employees of restricted or deferred stock measured at the market value on the date of grant. Unearned compensation is displayed as a reduction of stockholders equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Unfunded CommitmentsLegally binding agreements to provide
financing at a future date.
Variable Interest Entity (VIE)An entity that does not have enough equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from third parties. VIEs may include entities with equity investors that cannot make significant decisions about
the entitys operations. A VIE must be consolidated by its primary beneficiary, if any, which is the party that has the majority of the expected losses or residual returns of the VIE or both.
99
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Citigroup is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Citigroups internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Companys management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well
designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management maintains a comprehensive system of controls intended to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with managements
authorization, assets are safeguarded, and financial records are reliable. Management also takes steps to ensure that information and communication flows are effective, and to monitor performance, including performance of internal control
procedures.
Citigroup management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of
December 31, 2006, the Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Managements assessment of the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on page
101, which expressed unqualified opinions on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.
100
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMINTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Citigroup Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting that Citigroup Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company or Citigroup) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, managements assessment that Citigroup maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in our opinion, Citigroup maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets
of Citigroup as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report
dated February 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
New York, New York
February 23, 2007
101
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Citigroup Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Citigroup Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company or
Citigroup) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the
related consolidated balance sheets of Citibank, N.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Citigroup as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2006, and the financial position of Citibank, N.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2006 the Company changed its methods of accounting for defined benefit pensions and
other postretirement benefits, stock-based compensation, certain hybrid financial instruments and servicing of financial assets, and in 2005 the Company changed its method of accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations associated with
operating leases.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the effectiveness of Citigroups internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
New York, New York
February 23, 2007
102
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
104 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2006 and 2005 |
|
105 |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
106 |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
107 |
Consolidated Balance SheetCitibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries December 31, 2006 and 2005 |
|
108 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
109 |
Note 2 Business Developments |
|
117 |
Note 3 Discontinued Operations |
|
118 |
Note 4 Business Segments |
|
120 |
Note 5 Interest Revenue and Expense |
|
121 |
Note 6 Commissions and Fees |
|
121 |
Note 7 Principal Transactions Revenue |
|
122 |
Note 8 Incentive Plans |
|
122 |
Note 9 Retirement Benefits |
|
124 |
Note 10 Income Taxes |
|
130 |
Note 11 Earnings Per Share |
|
132 |
Note 12 Federal Funds, Securities Borrowed, Loaned, and Subject to Repurchase Agreements |
|
132 |
Note 13 Brokerage Receivables and Brokerage Payables |
|
133 |
Note 14 Trading Account Assets and Liabilities |
|
133 |
103
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME |
|
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
$ |
96,431 |
|
|
$ |
75,916 |
|
|
$ |
63,621 |
Interest expense |
|
|
56,943 |
|
|
|
36,676 |
|
|
|
22,004 |
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
39,488 |
|
|
$ |
39,240 |
|
|
$ |
41,617 |
Insurance premiums |
|
$ |
3,202 |
|
|
$ |
3,132 |
|
|
$ |
2,726 |
Commissions and fees |
|
|
19,535 |
|
|
|
17,143 |
|
|
|
15,981 |
Principal transactions |
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
3,716 |
Administration and other fiduciary fees |
|
|
6,934 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
5,524 |
Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
833 |
Other revenue |
|
|
10,957 |
|
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
9,238 |
Total non-interest revenues |
|
$ |
50,127 |
|
|
$ |
44,402 |
|
|
$ |
38,018 |
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
89,615 |
|
|
$ |
83,642 |
|
|
$ |
79,635 |
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
6,738 |
|
|
$ |
7,929 |
|
|
$ |
6,233 |
Policyholder benefits and claims |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
884 |
Provision for unfunded lending commitments |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
$ |
7,955 |
|
|
$ |
9,046 |
|
|
$ |
7,117 |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
30,277 |
|
|
$ |
25,772 |
|
|
$ |
22,934 |
Net occupancy expense |
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
4,791 |
Technology/communication expense |
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
Advertising and marketing expense |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
2,653 |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
9,578 |
|
|
|
8,193 |
|
|
|
15,886 |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
52,021 |
|
|
$ |
45,163 |
|
|
$ |
49,782 |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest, and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
29,639 |
|
|
$ |
29,433 |
|
|
$ |
22,736 |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
6,464 |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
218 |
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
908 |
|
|
$ |
1,446 |
Gain on sale |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
454 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
4,832 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,046 |
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
|
$ |
4.84 |
|
|
$ |
3.32 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
4,887.3 |
|
|
|
5,067.6 |
|
|
|
5,107.2 |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
|
$ |
3.07 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4.31 |
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
4,986.1 |
|
|
|
5,160.4 |
|
|
|
5,207.4 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
See Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
104
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET |
|
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
In millions of dollars, except shares |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) |
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
42,522 |
|
|
|
31,645 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
282,817 |
|
|
|
217,464 |
|
Brokerage receivables |
|
|
44,445 |
|
|
|
42,823 |
|
Trading account assets (including $125,231 and $92,495 pledged to creditors at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively) |
|
|
393,925 |
|
|
|
295,820 |
|
Investments (including $16,355 and $15,819 pledged to creditors at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $176 at
December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
273,591 |
|
|
|
180,597 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
512,921 |
|
|
|
454,620 |
|
Corporate (including $384 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
166,271 |
|
|
|
128,883 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
679,192 |
|
|
$ |
583,503 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,940 |
) |
|
|
(9,782 |
) |
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
670,252 |
|
|
$ |
573,721 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
33,415 |
|
|
|
33,130 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
15,901 |
|
|
|
14,749 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
100,936 |
|
|
|
80,456 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,494,037 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices |
|
$ |
38,615 |
|
|
$ |
36,638 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $366 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
195,002 |
|
|
|
169,277 |
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
35,149 |
|
|
|
32,614 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $472 at December 31, 2006 at fair
value) |
|
|
443,275 |
|
|
|
353,299 |
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
712,041 |
|
|
$ |
591,828 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
349,235 |
|
|
|
242,392 |
|
Brokerage payables |
|
|
85,119 |
|
|
|
70,994 |
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
145,887 |
|
|
|
121,108 |
|
Short-term borrowings (including $2,012 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
100,833 |
|
|
|
66,930 |
|
Long-term debt (including $9,439 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
288,494 |
|
|
|
217,499 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
82,926 |
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,764,535 |
|
|
$ |
1,381,500 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), at aggregate liquidation value |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 15 billion), issued shares: 2006 and 20055,477,416,086 shares |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
18,253 |
|
|
|
17,483 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
129,267 |
|
|
|
117,555 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost: 2006565,422,301 shares and 2005497,192,288 shares |
|
|
(25,092 |
) |
|
|
(21,149 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(3,700 |
) |
|
|
(2,532 |
) |
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
119,783 |
|
|
$ |
112,537 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,494,037 |
|
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
See Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Shares |
|
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
Redemption or retirement of preferred stock |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
17,538 |
|
|
$ |
16,960 |
|
|
$ |
15,736 |
|
|
5,477,416 |
|
|
5,477,416 |
|
|
5,477,416 |
|
Employee benefit plans |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
18,308 |
|
|
$ |
17,538 |
|
|
$ |
16,960 |
|
|
5,477,416 |
|
|
5,477,416 |
|
|
5,477,416 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
117,555 |
|
|
$ |
102,154 |
|
|
$ |
93,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
21,538 |
|
|
|
24,589 |
|
|
|
17,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common dividends (2) |
|
|
(9,761 |
) |
|
|
(9,120 |
) |
|
|
(8,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
129,267 |
|
|
$ |
117,555 |
|
|
$ |
102,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
(21,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,644 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,524 |
) |
|
(497,192 |
) |
|
(282,774 |
) |
|
(320,467 |
) |
Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans |
|
|
3,051 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
75,631 |
|
|
61,278 |
|
|
54,121 |
|
Treasury stock acquired (3) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,794 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(144,033 |
) |
|
(277,918 |
) |
|
(516 |
) |
Shares purchased from Employee Pension Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,001 |
) |
Other (4) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
172 |
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
(5,911 |
) |
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
(25,092 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,644 |
) |
|
(565,422 |
) |
|
(497,192 |
) |
|
(282,774 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
(2,532 |
) |
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
$ |
(806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of taxes |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(1,549 |
) |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes |
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes (5) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to initially apply SFAS 158, net of taxes |
|
|
(1,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,168 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,228 |
) |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
(3,700 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,532 |
) |
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity and common shares outstanding |
|
$ |
118,783 |
|
|
$ |
111,412 |
|
|
$ |
108,166 |
|
|
4,911,994 |
|
|
4,980,224 |
|
|
5,194,642 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
119,783 |
|
|
$ |
112,537 |
|
|
$ |
109,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
(2,228 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
20,370 |
|
|
$ |
22,361 |
|
|
$ |
17,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
(2) |
Common dividends declared were 49 cents per share in the first, second, third, and fourth quarters of 2006, 44 cents per share in the first, second, third, and fourth quarters of 2005, and 40
cents per share in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2004. |
(3) |
All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. On April 14, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $15 billion in
share repurchases. Additionally, on April 17, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. |
(4) |
In 2004, primarily represents shares redeemed from a legacy employee plan trust. |
(5) |
Reflects additional minimum liability, as required by SFAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87), related to unfunded or book reserve plans, such as the
U.S. nonqualified pension plans and certain foreign plans. |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
106
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS |
|
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Gain on sale, net of taxes |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
4,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(493 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
Deferred tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,988 |
|
|
|
8,179 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
Change in trading account assets |
|
|
(98,105 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
(43,071 |
) |
Change in trading account liabilities |
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
|
(13,986 |
) |
|
|
13,110 |
|
Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
(65,353 |
) |
|
|
(16,725 |
) |
|
|
(28,131 |
) |
Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
106,843 |
|
|
|
33,808 |
|
|
|
22,966 |
|
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables |
|
|
12,503 |
|
|
|
17,236 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Net gains from sales of investments |
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
(1,962 |
) |
|
|
(833 |
) |
Change in loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
|
|
(2,150 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(8,426 |
) |
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
13,001 |
|
Total adjustments |
|
$ |
(21,345 |
) |
|
$ |
12,238 |
|
|
$ |
(18,163 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
32,044 |
|
|
$ |
(2,109 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deposits with banks |
|
$ |
(10,877 |
) |
|
$ |
( 5,084 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,245 |
) |
Change in loans |
|
|
(356,062 |
) |
|
|
(291,000 |
) |
|
|
(259,751 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans |
|
|
253,176 |
|
|
|
245,335 |
|
|
|
206,421 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(296,124 |
) |
|
|
(203,023 |
) |
|
|
(195,903 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
86,999 |
|
|
|
82,603 |
|
|
|
112,470 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
121,111 |
|
|
|
97,513 |
|
|
|
63,318 |
|
Other investments, primarily short-term, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Capital expenditures on premises and equipment |
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
(3,724 |
) |
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
17,611 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(204,206 |
) |
|
$ |
(60,223 |
) |
|
$ |
( 80,301 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
$ |
(9,826 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,375 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Redemption of preferred stock, net |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,794 |
) |
|
|
(779 |
) |
Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(511 |
) |
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
113,687 |
|
|
|
68,852 |
|
|
|
75,764 |
|
Payments and redemptions of long-term debt |
|
|
(46,468 |
) |
|
|
(52,364 |
) |
|
|
(49,686 |
) |
Change in deposits |
|
|
121,203 |
|
|
|
27,713 |
|
|
|
65,651 |
|
Change in short-term borrowings |
|
|
33,903 |
|
|
|
10,163 |
|
|
|
(4,363 |
) |
Contractholder fund deposits |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
11,797 |
|
Contractholder fund withdrawals |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(7,266 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
206,430 |
|
|
$ |
33,084 |
|
|
$ |
83,144 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
(1,840 |
) |
|
$ |
731 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
Change in cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
2,882 |
|
|
$ |
3,019 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
|
$ |
20,613 |
|
|
$ |
19,276 |
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
|
$ |
20,613 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
8,621 |
|
|
$ |
6,808 |
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
|
51,472 |
|
|
$ |
32,081 |
|
|
|
18,544 |
|
Non-cash investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
See Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
107
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET |
|
Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
In millions of dollars, except shares |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
18,917 |
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
38,377 |
|
|
|
22,182 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
10,795 |
|
Trading account assets (including $117 and $600 pledged to creditors at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) |
|
|
103,945 |
|
|
|
86,933 |
|
Investments (including $1,953 and $1,416 pledged to creditors at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $176 at
December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
215,222 |
|
|
|
123,700 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (including $384 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
558,952 |
|
|
|
559,320 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(5,152 |
) |
|
|
(4,939 |
) |
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
553,800 |
|
|
$ |
554,381 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13,799 |
|
|
|
13,319 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
5,680 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
6,226 |
|
Interest and fees receivable |
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
5,427 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,790 |
|
|
|
36,977 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,019,497 |
|
|
$ |
885,315 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices |
|
$ |
38,663 |
|
|
$ |
37,644 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $366 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
167,015 |
|
|
|
159,479 |
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
31,169 |
|
|
|
28,738 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $472 at December 31, 2006 at fair
value) |
|
|
428,896 |
|
|
|
320,394 |
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
665,743 |
|
|
$ |
546,255 |
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
43,136 |
|
|
|
46,778 |
|
Purchased funds and other borrowings (including $442 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
73,081 |
|
|
|
68,457 |
|
Brokerage payables |
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued taxes and other expense |
|
|
10,777 |
|
|
|
11,454 |
|
Long-term debt and subordinated notes (including $2,666 at December 31, 2006 at fair value) |
|
|
115,833 |
|
|
|
129,266 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
32,411 |
|
|
|
22,864 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
946,344 |
|
|
$ |
825,074 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
|
37,978 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
30,358 |
|
|
|
24,062 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (2) |
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
73,153 |
|
|
$ |
60,241 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,019,497 |
|
|
$ |
885,315 |
|
(1) |
The 2005 Consolidated Balance Sheet for Citibank, N.A. has been restated in accordance with SFAS 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), to reflect the impact of the bank
consolidation project in which several affiliates were transferred between Citibank, N.A. and other affiliates under the common control of Citigroup. See Note 29 on page 156 for a full description of the bank consolidation project.
|
(2) |
Amounts at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 include the after-tax amounts for net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities of ($119) million and ($353) million,
respectively, for foreign currency translation of ($456) million and ($2.382) billion, respectively, for cash flow hedges of ($131) million and $299 million, respectively, and for additional minimum pension liability of ($1.003) billion and ($114)
million, respectively, of which ($886) million relates to the initial adoption of SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006. |
See Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
108
|
|
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries |
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Citigroup and its subsidiaries (the Company). The Company consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds,
directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where the Company holds 20% to 50% of the voting rights and/or has the ability to exercise significant influence, other than investments of designated
venture capital subsidiaries, are accounted for under the equity method, and the pro rata share of their income (loss) is included in other revenue. Income from investments in less than 20%-owned companies is recognized when dividends are received.
As discussed below, Citigroup consolidates entities deemed to be variable interest entities (VIEs) when Citigroup is determined to be the primary beneficiary. Gains and losses on the disposition of branches, subsidiaries, affiliates, buildings, and
other investments and charges for managements estimate of impairment in their value that is other than temporary, such that recovery of the carrying amount is deemed unlikely, are included in other revenue.
Citibank, N.A.
Citibank, N.A. is a commercial bank and wholly owned subsidiary
of Citigroup Inc. Citibanks principal offerings include consumer finance, mortgage lending, and retail banking products and services; investment banking, commercial banking, cash management, trade finance and e-commerce products and services;
and private banking products and services.
The Company includes a balance sheet and statement of changes in stockholders equity for
Citibank, N.A. to provide information about this entity to shareholders and international regulatory agencies. (See Notes 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 155 and 156, respectively.)
Variable Interest Entities
An entity is referred to as a variable interest
entity (VIE) if it meets the criteria outlined in FASB Interpretation No. 46-R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) (FIN 46-R), which are: (1) the entity has equity that is insufficient to permit
the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (2) the entity has equity investors that cannot make significant decisions about the entitys operations or that do not absorb
the expected losses or receive the expected returns of the entity.
In addition, as specified in FIN 46-R, a VIE must be consolidated by the
Company if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, which is the party involved with the VIE that has a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the expected residual returns or both.
Along with the VIEs that are consolidated in accordance with these guidelines, the Company has significant variable interests in other VIEs that are not
consolidated because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. These include multi-seller finance companies, collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), many structured finance transactions, and various investment funds. All other entities not deemed
to be VIEs, with which the Company has involvement, are evaluated for consolidation under Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, and SFAS. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries (SFAS 94).
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using year-end spot foreign exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated monthly at amounts that approximate weighted average exchange rates, with resulting gains and losses included in income. The
effects of translating income with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar are included in stockholders equity along with related hedge and tax effects. The effects of translating operations with the U.S. dollar as the functional
currency, including those in highly inflationary environments, are included in other revenue along with the related hedge effects. Hedges of foreign currency exposures include forward currency contracts and designated issues of non-U.S. dollar debt.
Investment Securities
Investments include fixed income and
equity securities. Fixed income instruments include bonds, notes and redeemable preferred stocks, as well as certain loan-backed and structured securities subject to prepayment risk. Equity securities include common and nonredeemable preferred
stocks. Fixed income investments classified as held to maturity represent securities that the Company has both the ability and the intent to hold until maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Fixed income securities and marketable
equity securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value, which is determined based upon quoted market prices when available. If quoted market prices are not available, discounted expected cash flows using market
rates commensurate with the characteristics of the investment are used. Unrealized gains and losses and related hedge effects are reported in a separate component of stockholders equity, net of applicable income taxes. Declines in fair value
that are determined to be other than temporary are charged to earnings. Accrual of income is suspended on fixed income instruments that are in default or on which it is likely that future interest payments will not be made as scheduled. Fixed income
instruments subject to prepayment risk are accounted for using the retrospective method, where the principal amortization and effective yield are recalculated each period based on actual historical and projected future cash flows. Realized gains and
losses on sales of investments are included in earnings on a specific identification cost basis.
Citigroups private equity
subsidiaries include subsidiaries registered as Small Business Investment Companies and other subsidiaries that engage exclusively in venture capital activities. Venture capital investments are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value
recognized in other revenue. The fair values of publicly traded securities held by these subsidiaries are generally based upon quoted market prices. In certain situations, including thinly traded securities, large block holdings, restricted shares,
or other special situations, the quoted market prices are adjusted to produce an estimate of the attainable fair value for the securities. For securities held by these subsidiaries that are not publicly traded, estimates of fair value are made based
upon a review of the investees financial results, condition and prospects, together with comparisons to similar companies for which quoted market prices are available.
109
Trading Account Assets and Liabilities
Trading account assets and liabilities,
including securities and derivatives, are carried at fair value. Fair value is determined based upon quoted prices when available, or under an alternative approach such as matrix or model pricing when market prices are not readily available. If
quoted market prices are not available for fixed income securities or derivatives, the Company discounts the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. Obligations to deliver
securities sold, not yet purchased, are also carried at fair value and included in trading account liabilities. The determination of fair value considers various factors, including: closing exchange or over-the-counter market price quotations; time
value and volatility factors underlying options, warrants, and derivatives; price activity for equivalent or synthetic instruments; counterparty credit quality; the potential impact on market prices or fair value of liquidating the Companys
positions in an orderly manner over a reasonable period of time under current market conditions; and derivatives transaction maintenance costs during that period. The fair value of aged inventory is actively monitored and, where appropriate, is
discounted to reflect the implied illiquidity for positions that have been available-for-immediate-sale for longer than 90 days. Changes in fair value of trading account assets and liabilities are recognized in earnings. Interest expense on trading
account liabilities is reported as a reduction of interest revenue.
Commodities are accounted for on a lower of cost or market (LOCOM)
basis and include physical quantities of commodities involving future settlement or delivery. Related gains or losses are reported as principal transactions.
Derivatives used for trading purposes include interest rate, currency, equity, credit, and commodity swap agreements, options, caps and floors, warrants, and financial and commodity futures and forward contracts. The
fair value of derivatives is determined based upon liquid market prices evidenced by exchange traded prices, broker/dealer quotations, or prices of other transactions with similarly rated counterparties. The fair value includes an adjustment for
individual counterparty credit risk and other adjustments, as appropriate, to reflect liquidity and ongoing servicing costs. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect cash the Company has paid or received (for example, option premiums and cash
margin in connection with credit support agreements). Derivatives in a net receivable position, as well as options owned and warrants held, are reported as trading account assets. Similarly, derivatives in a net payable position, as well as options
written and warrants issued, are reported as trading account liabilities. Revenues generated from derivative instruments used for trading purposes are reported as principal transactions and include realized gains and losses, as well as unrealized
gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of such instruments. Trading profit at inception of a derivative transaction is not recognized unless the fair value of that derivative is obtained from a quoted market price, supported by
comparison to other observable market transactions, or based upon a valuation technique incorporating observable market data. The Company defers trade date gains and losses on derivative transactions where the fair value is not determined based upon
observable market transactions and market data. The deferral is recognized in income when the market data becomes observable or over the life of the transaction.
Securities Borrowed and Securities
Loaned
Securities borrowed and securities loaned are recorded at the amount of cash advanced or received. With respect to securities loaned, the
Company receives cash collateral in an amount in excess of the market value of securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and loaned on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained as necessary. Interest
received or paid is recorded in interest income or interest expense.
Repurchase and Resale Agreements
Repurchase and resale agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently
reacquired or resold, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements. The Companys policy is to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. The market value of securities to be repurchased and
resold is monitored, and additional collateral is obtained where appropriate to protect against credit exposure.
Loans and Leases
Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs. Loan origination fees and certain direct
origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed by the Global Consumer business and Private Bank. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for open-end
revolving and closed-end installment and real estate loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards, however, the Company accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Interest and fees earned, but not collected,
are reversed when interest is no longer accrued.
As a general rule, unsecured closed-end installment loans are charged off at 120 days past
due and unsecured open-end (revolving) loans are charged off at 180 days contractually past due. Loans secured with non-real-estate collateral are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at 120 days past due.
Real-estate secured loans (both open- and closed-end) are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, at 180 days contractually past due.
In certain consumer businesses in the U.S., secured real estate loans are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, at the earlier of the receipt of title or 12 months in foreclosure (a
process that must commence when payments are 120 days contractually past due). Closed-end loans secured by non-real-estate collateral are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at 180 days contractually past due.
Unsecured loans (both open- and closed-end) are charged off at 180 days contractually past due and 180 days from the last payment, but in no event can these loans exceed 360 days contractually past due.
Unsecured loans in bankruptcy are charged off within 30 days of notification of filing by the bankruptcy court or within the contractual write-off
periods, whichever occurs earlier. In CitiFinancial (a component of the U.S. Consumer Lending business), unsecured loans in bankruptcy are charged off when they are 30 days contractually past due.
110
Commercial Business includes loans and leases made principally to small- and middle-market businesses. Commercial Business loans are placed on
a non-accrual basis when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when payments are past due for 90 days or more, except when the loan is well secured and in the process of collection.
Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter
included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash.
Corporate Loans
Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by the CIB. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is
doubtful, or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current
earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectibility of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded
investment in the loan. Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of
the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest
amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.
Lease Financing
Transactions
Loans include the Companys share of aggregate rentals on lease financing transactions and residual values net of related unearned
income. Lease financing transactions represent direct financing leases and also include leveraged leases. Unearned income is amortized under a method that results in an approximate level rate of return when related to the unrecovered lease
investment. Gains and losses from sales of residual values of leased equipment are included in other revenue.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale within other assets and are accounted for at the lower of cost or
market value, with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged to other revenue.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes
only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for credit losses. Credit losses are deducted from the allowance, and
subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently
accounted for as securities available-for-sale.
In the Corporate and Commercial Business portfolios, larger-balance, non-homogeneous
exposures representing significant individual credit
exposures are evaluated based upon the borrowers overall financial condition, resources, and payment record; the prospects for support from any
financially responsible guarantors; and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. Reserves are established for these loans based upon an estimate of probable losses for the individual loans deemed to be impaired. This estimate
considers all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less
disposal costs. The allowance for credit losses attributed to the remaining portfolio is established via a process that estimates the probable loss inherent in the portfolio based upon various analyses. These analyses consider historical and project
default rates and loss severities; internal risk ratings; and geographic, industry, and other environmental factors. Management also considers overall portfolio indicators including trends in internally risk-rated exposures, classified exposures,
cash-basis loans, historical and forecasted write-offs, and a review of industry, geographic, and portfolio concentrations, including current developments within those segments. In addition, management considers the current business strategy and
credit process, including credit limit setting and compliance, credit approvals, loan underwriting criteria, and loan workout procedures.
For Consumer loans (excluding Commercial Business loans), each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogenous loansincluding consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loansis collectively evaluated for
impairment. The allowance for credit losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical
delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions. Management also considers overall portfolio indicators including historical credit losses;
delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; an evaluation of overall credit quality; the credit process, including lending policies and procedures; and economic, geographical, product and other
environmental factors.
Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments
A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet within other
liabilities.
Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)
Mortgage servicing
rights (MSRs), which are included within intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, are recognized as assets when purchased or when the Company sells or securitizes loans acquired through purchase or origination and retains the right to
service the loans.
With the Company electing to early-adopt SFAS 156 as of January 1, 2006, MSRs in the U.S. mortgage and student loan
classes of servicing rights are accounted for at fair value, with changes in value recorded in current earnings. Upon electing the fair value method of accounting for its MSRs, the Company discontinued the application of SFAS 133 fair value hedge
accounting, the calculation of amortization and the assessment of impairment for the MSRs. The MSR valuation allowance at the date of adoption of SFAS 156 was written off against the recorded value of the MSRs.
111
Prior to 2006, only the portion of the MSR portfolio that was hedged with instruments qualifying for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 was recorded at fair
value. The remaining portion, which was hedged with instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133, was accounted for at the lower-of-cost-or-market. Servicing rights retained in the securitization of mortgage loans were
measured by allocating the carrying value of the loans between the assets sold and the interests retained, based on the relative fair values at the date of securitization. MSRs were amortized using a proportionate cash flow method over the period of
the related net positive servicing income to be generated from the various portfolios purchased or loans originated. Impairment of MSRs was evaluated on a disaggregated basis by type (i.e., fixed rate or adjustable rate) and by interest-rate band,
which were believed to be the predominant risk characteristics of the Companys servicing portfolio. Any excess of the carrying value of the capitalized servicing rights over the fair value by stratum was recognized through a valuation
allowance for each stratum and charged to the provision for impairment on MSRs.
Additional information on the Companys MSRs can be
found in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents an acquired companys acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests, whereby goodwill is allocated to the
Companys reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Furthermore, on any business dispositions, goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the
ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit.
Intangible Assets
Intangible Assetsincluding core deposit intangibles, present value of future profits, purchased credit card relationships, other customer relationships, and other
intangible assetsare amortized over their estimated useful lives. Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives, primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names, are not amortized and are
subject to annual impairment tests. An impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value. For other intangible assets subject to amortization, an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount
is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset.
Repossessed Assets
Upon repossession, loans are adjusted, if necessary, to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral and transferred to repossessed assets. This is reported in other assets, net of a valuation allowance for
selling costs and net declines in value as appropriate.
Securitizations
The Company primarily securitizes credit card receivables and mortgages. Other types of securitized assets include corporate debt securities, auto loans, and student loans.
There are two key accounting determinations that must be made relating to securitizations. First, in the case where Citigroup originated or owned the
financial assets transferred to the securitization entity, a decision must be made as to whether that transfer is considered a sale under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. If it is a sale, the transferred assets are
removed from the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet with a gain or loss recognized. Alternatively, when the transfer would be considered not a sale
but rather a financing, the assets will remain on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet with an offsetting liability recognized in the amount of received proceeds.
Second, a determination must be made as to whether the securitization entity would be included in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. For each securitization entity with which it is involved, the
Company makes a determination of whether the entity should be considered a subsidiary of the Company and be included in its Consolidated Financial Statements or whether the entity is sufficiently independent that it does not need to be consolidated.
If the securitization entitys activities are sufficiently restricted to meet accounting requirements to be a qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE), the securitization entity is not consolidated by the seller of the transferred assets. If
the securitization entity is determined to be a VIE, the Company consolidates the VIE if it is the primary beneficiary.
For all other
securitization entities determined not to be VIEs in which Citigroup participates, a consolidation decision is made by evaluating several factors, including how much of the entitys ownership is in the hands of third-party investors, who
controls the securitization entity, and who reaps the rewards and bears the risks of the entity. Only securitization entities controlled by Citigroup are consolidated.
Interest in the securitized and sold loans may be retained in the form of subordinated interest-only strips, subordinated tranches, spread accounts, and servicing rights. The Company retains a sellers interest
in the credit card receivables transferred to the trusts, which is not in securitized form. Accordingly, the sellers interest is carried on a historical cost basis and classified as consumer loans. Retained interests in securitized mortgage
loans are classified as trading account assets. Other retained interests are primarily recorded as available-for-sale investments, except for servicing rights that are included in Intangible Assets. However, since January 1, 2006, servicing
rights are initially recorded at fair value. Gains or losses on securitization and sale depend in part on the previous carrying amount of the loans involved in the transfer and, prior to January 1, 2006, were allocated between the loans sold and the
retained interests based on their relative fair values at the date of sale. Gains are recognized at the time of securitization and are reported in other revenue.
The Company values its securitized retained interests at fair value using either financial models, quoted market prices, or sales of similar assets. Where quoted market prices are not available, the Company estimates
the fair value of these retained interests by determining the present value of expected future cash flows using modeling techniques that incorporate managements best estimates of key assumptions, including prepayment speeds, credit losses, and
discount rates.
Additional information on the Companys securitization activities can be found in Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements on page 92 and in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143.
Transfers of Financial Assets
For a transfer of financial assets to be considered a sale, the assets must have been isolated from the Company, even in bankruptcy or other receivership; the purchaser
must have the right to sell the assets transferred and the Company may not have an option or any obligation to reacquire the assets, or the purchaser must be a QSPE. If these sale requirements are met, the assets are removed from the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet. If the
112
conditions for sale are not met, the transfer is considered to be a secured borrowing, the assets remain on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the sale
proceeds are recognized as the Companys liability. A legal opinion on a sale is generally obtained for complex transactions or where the Company has continuing involvement with assets transferred or with the securitization entity. Those
opinions must state that the asset transfer is considered a sale and that the assets transferred would not be consolidated with the Companys other assets in the event of the Companys insolvency.
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143.
Risk Management Activities Derivatives Used for Non-Trading Purposes
The Company manages its exposures to market rate movements
outside its trading activities by modifying the asset and liability mix, either directly or through the use of derivative financial products, including interest rate swaps, futures, forwards, and purchased option positions such as interest rate
caps, floors, and collars as well as foreign exchange contracts. These end-user derivatives are carried at fair value in other assets or other liabilities.
To qualify as a hedge, a derivative must be highly effective in offsetting the risk designated as being hedged. The hedge relationship must be formally documented at inception, detailing the particular risk management
objective and strategy for the hedge, which includes the item and risk that is being hedged and the derivative that is being used, as well as how effectiveness will be assessed and ineffectiveness measured. The effectiveness of these hedging
relationships is evaluated on a retrospective and prospective basis, typically using quantitative measures of correlation with hedge ineffectiveness measured and recorded in current earnings. If a hedge relationship is found to be ineffective, it no
longer qualifies as a hedge and any gains or losses attributable to the derivatives, as well as subsequent changes in fair value, are recognized in other revenue.
The foregoing criteria are applied on a decentralized basis, consistent with the level at which market risk is managed, but are subject to various limits and controls. The underlying asset, liability, firm commitment,
or forecasted transaction may be an individual item or a portfolio of similar items.
For fair value hedges, in which derivatives hedge the
fair value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments, changes in the fair value of derivatives are reflected in other revenue, together with changes in the fair value of the related hedged item. These are expected to, and generally do, offset each
other. Any net amount, representing hedge ineffectiveness, is reflected in current earnings. Citigroups fair value hedges are primarily hedges of fixed-rate long-term debt, loans, and available-for-sale securities.
For cash flow hedges, in which derivatives hedge the variability of cash flows related to floating rate assets, liabilities, or forecasted transactions,
the accounting treatment depends on the effectiveness of the hedge. To the extent these derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the derivatives fair values will not be included in current
earnings but are reported as Accumulated other comprehensive income. These changes in fair value will be included in earnings of future periods when the hedged cash flows come into earnings. To the extent these derivatives are not effective, changes
in their fair values are immediately included in other revenue. Citigroups cash flow hedges primarily include hedges of loans, rollovers of short-term liabilities, and foreign currency denominated funding. They also include hedges of certain
forecasted transactions in which a substantial majority of them mature within five years.
For net investment hedges in which derivatives hedge the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, the accounting treatment
will similarly depend on the effectiveness of the hedge. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative, including any forward premium or discount, is reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income as part of the foreign
currency translation adjustment.
End-user derivatives that are economic hedges rather than qualifying for hedge accounting purposes are
also carried at fair value, with changes in value included in principal transactions or other revenue. Citigroup often uses economic hedges when qualifying for hedge accounting would be too complex or operationally burdensome; examples are hedges of
the credit risk component of commercial loans and loan commitments. Citigroup periodically evaluates its hedging strategies in other areas, such as mortgage servicing rights, and may designate either a qualifying hedge or economic hedge, after
considering the relative cost and benefits. Economic hedges are also employed when the hedged item itself is marked to market through current earnings, such as hedges of commitments to originate one-to-four family mortgage loans to be held-for-sale.
For those hedge relationships that are terminated or when hedge designations are removed, the hedge accounting treatment described in the
paragraphs above is no longer applied. The end-user derivative is terminated or transferred to the trading account. For fair value hedges, any changes in the fair value of the hedged item remain as part of the basis of the asset or liability and are
ultimately reflected as an element of the yield. For cash flow hedges, any changes in fair value of the end-user derivative remain in Accumulated other comprehensive income and are included in earnings of future periods when the hedged cash flows
impact earnings. However, if the forecasted transaction is no longer likely to occur, any changes in fair value of the end-user derivative are immediately reflected in other revenue.
Employee Benefits Expense
Employee benefits expense includes current service costs of pension and other postretirement benefit
plans, which are accrued on a current basis; contributions and unrestricted awards under other employee plans; the amortization of restricted stock awards; and costs of other employee benefits.
Stock-Based Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2003, Citigroup accounted for
stock-based compensation plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations (APB 25). Under APB 25, there was generally no charge to earnings for
employee stock option awards, because the options granted under these plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the grant date. Alternatively, SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123), allowed companies to recognize compensation expense over the related service period based on the grant date fair value of the stock award.
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value provisions of SFAS 123. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which replaced the existing SFAS 123 and APB 25. See Accounting Changes on the next page.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states and municipalities and those of the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company
operates. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations
113
by the taxpayer and the relevant governmental taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, the Company must make judgments and
interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. The Company must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions, both domestic and foreign.
Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be subject to review/adjudication by the court systems of the various tax jurisdictions
or may be settled with the taxing authority upon examination or audit.
Deferred taxes are recorded for the future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to managements judgment that realization is more likely than not.
Commissions, Underwriting, and Principal Transactions
Commissions,
Underwriting, and Principal Transactions revenues and related expenses are recognized in income on a trade-date basis.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share is computed after recognition of preferred stock dividend requirements. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock
were exercised. It is computed after giving consideration to the weighted average dilutive effect of the Companys stock options and the shares issued under the Companys Capital Accumulation Program and other restricted stock plans.
Use of Estimates
Management must make estimates and assumptions
that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management makes its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Flows
Cash equivalents are defined as those amounts included in cash and due from banks. Cash flows from risk management
activities are classified in the same category as the related assets and liabilities.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
As of
December 31, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS 158). In accordance with this standard, Citigroup recorded the funded status
of each of its defined benefit pension and postretirement plans as an asset or liability on its Consolidated Balance Sheet with a corresponding offset, net of taxes, recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Stockholders
Equity, resulting in an after-tax decrease in equity of $1.647 billion. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 124.
The following table shows the effects of
adopting SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006 on individual line items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Before application of SFAS 158 |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
After application of SFAS 158 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,620 |
|
|
$ |
(534 |
) |
|
$ |
2,086 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
$ |
3,653 |
|
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
$ |
4,687 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,053 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,647 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
(3,700 |
) |
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
121,430 |
|
|
$ |
(1,647 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
119,783 |
|
(1) |
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of taxes. |
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which replaced the
existing SFAS 123 and APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123(R) requires companies to measure compensation expense for stock options and other share-based payments based on the instruments grant date fair
value, and to record expense based on that fair value reduced by expected forfeitures.
The Company adopted this standard by using the
modified prospective approach. Beginning January 1, 2006, Citigroup recorded incremental expense for stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003 (the date the Company adopted SFAS 123). That expense will equal the remaining unvested
portion of the grant date fair value of those stock options, reduced by estimated forfeitures. The Company recorded incremental compensation expense of $43 million during the year. Based on current estimates, the incremental charge for all of 2007
will be $11 million pretax.
The Company maintains a number of incentive programs in which equity awards are granted to eligible employees.
The most significant of the programs offered is the Capital Accumulation Program (CAP). Under the CAP program, the Company grants deferred and restricted shares to eligible employees. The program provides that employees who meet certain age plus
years-of-service requirements (retirement-eligible employees) may terminate active employment and continue vesting in their awards provided they comply with specified non-compete provisions. For awards granted to retirement-eligible employees prior
to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company has been and will continue to amortize the compensation cost of these awards over the full vesting periods. Awards granted to retirement-eligible employees after the adoption of SFAS 123(R) must be either
expensed on the grant date or accrued in the year prior to the grant date.
The impact to 2006 was a charge of $648 million ($398 million
after-tax) for the immediate expensing of awards granted to retirement-eligible employees in January 2006, and $824 million ($526 million after-tax) for the accrual of the awards that were granted in January 2007. The Company has changed the
plans retirement eligibility provisions for the January 2007 management awards, which affected the amount of the accrual in 2006.
In
adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company began to recognize compensation expense for restricted or deferred stock awards net of estimated forfeitures. Previously, the effects of forfeitures were recorded as they occurred.
114
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, prospectively for all awards granted, modified, or settled
after December 31, 2002. This was in effect until December 31, 2005, after which the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) as outlined above. The prospective method is one of the adoption methods provided for under SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148) issued in December 2002. SFAS 123 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and recognized over the employees
service period (which is generally equal to the vesting period). For stock options, the compensation cost is determined using option pricing models intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date. Similar to APB 25 (the
alternative method of accounting), under SFAS 123, an offsetting increase to stockholders equity is recorded equal to the amount of compensation expense. Earnings per share dilution is recognized as well.
Had the Company applied SFAS 123 prior to 2003 in accounting for all of the Companys stock option plans, including the Citigroup 2003 Stock Purchase
Program, net income and net income per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts |
|
2006 (1) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Compensation expense related to stock option plans, net of taxes |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
80 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
325 |
Net income |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
21,538 |
|
|
24,510 |
|
|
16,894 |
Basic earnings per share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
$ |
4.84 |
|
$ |
3.32 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
3.29 |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
4.31 |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
3.23 |
(1) |
There are no differences in the 2006 reported results due to the implementation of SFAS 123(R). |
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company changed its option valuation method from the Black-Scholes model to a lattice-type model, which did not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The Company has made changes to various stock-based compensation plan provisions for future awards. For example, in January
2005, the Company largely moved from granting stock options to granting restricted and deferred stock awards, unless participants elect to receive all or a portion of their award in the form of stock options. Thus, the majority of management options
granted in 2005 were due to stock option elections and carried the same vesting period as the restricted or deferred stock awards in lieu of which they were granted. Stock options granted in 2003 and 2004 have three-year vesting periods and six-year
terms. In addition, the sale of underlying shares acquired upon exercise is restricted for a two-year period and pursuant to a stock ownership commitment; senior executives must retain 75% of the shares they own and acquire from the Company over the
term of their employment. Options granted in 2003 and thereafter do not have a reload feature; however, some previously granted options retain that feature.
See Note 8 to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements on page 122.
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments
On January 1, 2006, the Company elected to early-adopt, primarily on a prospective basis, SFAS No. 155, Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments (SFAS 155). In accordance with this standard, hybrid financial instrumentssuch as structured notes containing embedded
derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as interest-only instrumentsmay be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value
are recorded in current earnings. The impact of adopting this standard was not material.
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
On January 1, 2006, the Company elected to early-adopt SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS 156). This
pronouncement requires all servicing rights to be initially recognized at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, it permits a one-time irrevocable election to remeasure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair
value being recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair value
accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material.
Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations
On December 31, 2005, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires entities to estimate and recognize a liability for costs associated with the retirement or removal of an asset from service, regardless of
the uncertainty of timing or whether performance will be required. For Citigroup, this applies to certain real estate restoration activities in the Companys branches and office space, most of which is rented under operating lease agreements.
Local market practices and requirements with regard to restoration activity under a real estate lease agreement differ by region. Based on
a review of active lease terms and conditions, historical costs of past restoration activities, and local market practices, an estimate of the expected real estate restoration costs for some of the Companys branches and office space was
determined. Each region applied local inflation and discount rates to determine the present value of the liability and capitalized asset amounts.
The impact of adopting FIN 47 was an increase to total liabilities and total assets of $150 million and $122 million, respectively. The increase in total assets is net of an increase in accumulated depreciation of $52 million. In addition,
a $49 million after-tax ($80 million pretax) charge to earnings, which was reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income as the cumulative effect of an accounting change, was recorded in the 2005 fourth quarter.
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer
On
January 1, 2005, Statement of Position (SOP) No. 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3), was adopted for loan acquisitions. SOP 03-3 requires acquired loans to be recorded
at fair value and prohibits carrying over valuation allowances in the initial accounting for acquired impaired loans. Loans carried at fair value, mortgage loans held-for-sale, and loans to borrowers in good standing under revolving credit
agreements are excluded from the scope of SOP 03-3.
115
SOP 03-3 limits the yield that may be accreted to the excess of the undiscounted expected cash flows over the investors initial investment in the loan.
The excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows may not be recognized as an adjustment of yield. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the loans
yield over its remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairments.
Determining the Variability in a Potential VIE
The FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46(R)-6, Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FSP FIN
46(R)-6), in April 2006. FSP FIN 46(R)-6 addresses the application of FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, in determining whether certain contracts or arrangements with a variable interest entity (VIE) are
variable interests by requiring companies to base such evaluations on an analysis of the VIEs purpose and design, rather than its legal form or accounting classification. FSP FIN 46(R)-6 is required to be applied for all reporting periods
beginning after June 15, 2006. The adoption of the FSP did not result in material differences from Citigroups existing accounting policies regarding the consolidation of VIEs.
Postretirement Benefits
In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS No. 106-2, Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP FAS 106-2), which supersedes FSP FAS 106-1, in response to the December 2003 enactment of the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act of 2003). The Act of 2003 established a prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible participants, as well as a federal subsidy of 28% of prescription drug claims for sponsors of retiree health
care plans with drug benefits that are at least actuarially equivalent to those offered under Medicare Part D. If a plan qualifies, FSP FAS 106-2 requires plan sponsors to disclose the effect of the subsidy on the net periodic expense and the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in their financial statements. Plan sponsors that initially elected to defer accounting for the effects of the subsidy are allowed the option of retroactive application to the date of enactment or
prospective application from the date of adoption.
In the 2004 third quarter, Citigroup reflected the effects of the subsidy in its
financial statements retroactive to January 1, 2004 in accordance with FSP FAS 106-2. The effect of adopting FSP FAS 106-2 is included in Note 9 to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements on page 124.
Accounting for Loan Commitments Accounted for as Derivatives
On April 1,
2004, the Company adopted the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB 105), which specifies that servicing assets embedded in commitments for loans to be
held-for-sale should be recognized only when the servicing asset has been contractually separated from the associated loans by sale or securitization. The impact of implementing SAB 105 across all of the Companys business was a delay in
recognition of $35 million pretax in the 2004 second quarter.
Profit Recognition on Bifurcated Hybrid Instruments
On January 1, 2004, Citigroup revised the application of Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) Issue B6, Embedded Derivatives: Allocating
the Basis of a Hybrid Instrument to the Host Contract of the Embedded Derivative. In December 2003, the SEC staff gave a speech that clarified
the accounting for derivatives embedded in financial instruments (hybrid instruments) to preclude the recognition of any profit on the trade date for hybrid instruments that must be bifurcated for accounting purposes. The trade-date
revenue must instead be amortized over the life of the hybrid instrument. The impact of this change in application was an approximately $256 million pretax reduction in revenue, net of amortization, across all of the Companys businesses during
2004. This revenue is recognized over the life of the transactions, which on average is approximately four years.
Related Party Transactions
The Company has related party transactions with certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates. These transactions, which are primarily short-term in nature, include cash
accounts, collateralized financing transactions, margin accounts, derivative trading, charges for operational support and the borrowing and lending of funds and are entered into in the ordinary course of business.
FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which attempts to set out a consistent framework
for preparers to use to determine the appropriate level of tax reserves to maintain for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 uses a two-step approach wherein a tax benefit is recognized if a position is more
likely than not to be sustained. The amount of the benefit is then measured to be the highest tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized. FIN 48 also sets out disclosure requirements to enhance transparency of an entitys
tax reserves. Citigroup will be required to adopt this interpretation as of January 1, 2007. The Company expects that the effect of adopting FIN 48 will result in an immaterial adjustment to 2007 opening retained earnings.
Leveraged Leases
On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued a Staff Position,
Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leverage Lease Transaction (FSP 13-2), which provides guidance regarding changes or projected changes in the timing of
cash flows relating to income taxes generated by a leveraged lease transaction.
Leveraged leases can provide significant tax benefits
principally related to the timing of tax payments to the lessor. Since changes in the timing and/or amount of these tax benefits may have a material effect on the cash flows of a lease transaction, a lessor, in accordance with FSP 13-2, will be
required to perform a recalculation of a leveraged lease when there is a change or projected change in the timing of the realization of tax benefits generated by that lease. Currently, Citigroup does not recalculate the tax benefits if only the
timing of cash receipts has changed.
The effective date of FSP 13-2 for Citigroup is January 1, 2007. Citigroup expects the cumulative
effect of adopting FSP 13-2 to be a decrease to retained earnings of $152 million after-tax ($255 million pretax). This decrease to retained earnings will be reflected in earnings over the remaining lives of the leases as tax benefits are realized.
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157)
In September 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). This standard defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure
116
requirements about fair value measurements. In addition, SFAS 157 precludes the use of block discounts and supercedes the guidance in EITF 02-3, which
prohibited the recognition of day-1 gains on certain derivative trades when determining the fair value of instruments not traded in an active market. With the adoption of this standard, these changes will be reflected as a cumulative effect
adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The standard also requires Citigroup to reflect its own credit standing when measuring the fair value of debt it has issued that is carried at fair value, including derivatives, prospectively
from the date of adoption.
SFAS 157 is effective for Citigroups fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008, with earlier adoption
permitted for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this standard.
Fair Value Option (SFAS 159)
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). Under this Standard, the Company may elect to report financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis with changes in value reported in earnings. This
election is irrevocable. SFAS 159 provides an opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings that is caused by measuring hedged assets and liabilities that were previously required to use a different accounting method than the related
hedging contracts when the complex provisions of SFAS 133 hedge accounting are not met.
SFAS 159 is effective for years beginning after
November 15, 2007. Early adoption within 120 days of the beginning of the Companys 2007 fiscal year is permissible, provided the Company has not yet issued interim financial statements for 2007 and has adopted SFAS 157. Citigroup is
currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this Standard.
Potential Amendments to Various Current Accounting Standards
The FASB is currently working on amendments to the existing accounting standards governing asset transfers and securitizations. Upon completion of this standard, the
Company will need to reevaluate its accounting and disclosures. Due to the ongoing deliberations of the standard setters, the Company is unable to accurately determine the effect of future amendments or proposals at this time.
2. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS
U.K. Market Expansion
Egg
On January 29, 2007, the Company announced the agreement to acquire Egg Banking plc (Egg), the worlds largest
pure online bank and one of the U.K.s leading online financial services providers, from Prudential PLC for approximately $1.127 billion, subject to adjustments at closing. Egg has more than three million customers and offers various financial
products and services including online payment and account aggregation services, credit cards, personal loans, savings accounts, mortgages, insurance, and investments. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to close
before the end of the 2007 second quarter.
Quilter
On December 13, 2006, the Company announced the agreement to acquire Quilter, a U.K. wealth advisory firm with over $10.9 billion of assets under management, from Morgan Stanley. Quilter has more than 18,000 clients
and 300 staff located in 10 offices throughout the U.K., Ireland and the Channel Islands. This transaction, which is subject to U.S. and local country
regulatory approvals, is expected to close in the 2007 first quarter. Once closed, its business results will be included in Global Wealth Management.
Purchase of
20% Equity Interest in Akbank
On January 9, 2007, Citigroup purchased a 20% equity interest in Akbank for approximately $3.1 billion. Akbank, the
second-largest privately owned bank by assets in Turkey, is a premier, full-service retail, commercial, corporate and private bank.
Sabanci
Holding, a 34% owner of Akbank shares, and its subsidiaries have granted Citigroup a right of first refusal or first offer over the sale of any of their Akbank shares in the future. Subject to certain exceptions, including purchases from Sabanci
Holding and its subsidiaries, Citigroup has agreed not to increase its percentage ownership in Akbank.
Strategic Investment and Cooperation Agreement with
Guangdong Development Bank
On December 19, 2006, a Citigroup-led consortium acquired an 85.6% stake in Guangdong Development Bank (GDB).
Citigroups share is 20% of GDB and its investment of approximately $725 million will be accounted for under the equity method.
In
accordance with the parties agreement, Citigroup will have significant management influence at GDB to enhance GDBs management team and corporate governance standards, instill operational and lending best practices, improve risk
management and internal controls, upgrade GDBs information technology infrastructure, and further develop GDBs customer service and product offerings.
Central American Acquisitions
Grupo Cuscatlan
On December 13, 2006, Citigroup announced the agreement to acquire the subsidiaries of Grupo Cuscatlan for $1.51 billion in cash and stock from Corporacion UBC Internacional S.A. Grupo Cuscatlan is one of the
leading financial groups in Central America, with total assets of $5.4 billion, total loans of $3.5 billion, and total deposits of $3.4 billion. Grupo Cuscatlan has operations in El Salvador, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras and Panama. This
acquisition is subject to U.S. and local country regulatory approvals and is expected to close later in the 2007 first quarter.
Grupo Financiero
Uno
On October 27, 2006, Citigroup announced that it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire Grupo Financiero Uno (GFU), the largest credit
card issuer in Central America, and its affiliates. The acquisition of GFU, with $2.1 billion in assets, will expand the presence of Citigroups Latin America consumer franchise, enhancing its credit card business in the region and
establishing a platform for regional growth in Consumer Finance and Retail Banking.
GFU is privately held and has more than one million
retail clients, representing 1.1 million credit card accounts, $1.2 billion in credit card receivables and $1.3 billion in deposits in Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. GFU operates a distribution network of 75
branches and more than 100 mini-branches and points of sale.
This acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approvals in the United
States and each of the six countries, is anticipated to close later in the 2007 first quarter.
117
Acquisition of Federated Credit Card Portfolio and Credit Card Agreement with Federated Department Stores
In June 2005, Citigroup announced a long-term agreement with Federated Department Stores, Inc. (Federated) under which the companies partner to acquire and manage
approximately $6.2 billion of Federateds credit card receivables, including existing and new accounts, executed in three phases.
For
the first phase, which closed in October 2005, Citigroup acquired Federateds receivables under management, totaling approximately $3.3 billion. For the second phase, which closed in May 2006, additional Federated receivables totaling
approximately $1.9 billion were transferred to Citigroup from the previous provider. For the final phase, in July 2006, Citigroup acquired the approximately $1.0 billion credit card receivable portfolio of The May Department Stores Company (May),
which merged with Federated.
Citigroup paid a premium of approximately 11.5% to acquire these portfolios. The multi-year agreement also
provides Federated the ability to participate in the portfolio performance, based on credit sales and certain other performance metrics.
The Federated and May credit card portfolios comprise a total of approximately 17 million active accounts.
Consolidation of Brazils CrediCard
In April 2006, Citigroup and Banco Itau dissolved their joint venture in CrediCard, a Brazilian consumer credit card business. In accordance with the
dissolution agreement, Banco Itau received half of CrediCards assets and customer accounts in exchange for its 50% ownership, leaving Citigroup as the sole owner of CrediCard.
Acquisition of First American Bank
On March 31, 2005, Citigroup completed the acquisition of First American Bank in Texas
(FAB). The transaction established Citigroups retail branch presence in Texas, giving Citigroup 106 branches, $4.2 billion in assets and approximately 120,000 new customers in the state at the time of the transactions closing. The
results of FAB are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from March 2005 forward.
Divestiture of CitiCapitals Transportation Finance Business
On January 31, 2005, the Company completed the sale of CitiCapitals Transportation Finance Business based in Dallas and Toronto to GE
Commercial Finance for total cash consideration of approximately $4.6 billion. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of $111 million ($161 million pretax).
Sale
of Samba Financial Group
On June 15, 2004, the Company sold, for cash, its 20% equity investment in the Samba Financial Group (Samba, formerly
known as the Saudi American Bank) to the Public Investment Fund, a Saudi public sector entity. Citigroup recognized an after-tax gain of $756 million ($1.168 billion pretax) on the sale during the 2004 second quarter. The gain was shared equally
between Global Consumer and CIB.
Acquisition of KorAm Bank
On
April 30, 2004, Citigroup completed its tender offer to purchase all the outstanding shares of KorAm Bank (KorAm) at a price of KRW 15,500 per share in cash. In total Citigroup has acquired 99.9% of KorAms outstanding shares for a
total of KRW 3.14 trillion ($2.7 billion). The results of KorAm are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from May 2004
forward. During the 2004 fourth quarter, KorAm was merged with the Citibank Korea branch to form Citibank Korea Inc.
Divestiture of Electronic Financial Services Inc.
During January 2004, the
Company completed the sale for cash of Electronic Financial Services Inc. (EFS) for $390 million. EFS is a provider of government-issued benefits payments and prepaid stored-value cards used by state and federal government agencies, as well as of
stored-value services for private institutions. The sale of EFS resulted in an after-tax gain of $180 million ($255 million pretax) in the 2004 first quarter.
Acquisition of Washington Mutual Finance Corporation
On January 9, 2004, Citigroup completed the acquisition of Washington Mutual
Finance Corporation (WMF) for $1.25 billion in cash. WMF was the consumer finance subsidiary of Washington Mutual, Inc. WMF provides direct consumer installment loans and real-estate-secured loans, as well as sales finance and the sale of insurance.
The acquisition included 427 WMF offices located in 26 states, primarily in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States, and total assets of $3.8 billion. Citigroup has guaranteed all outstanding unsecured indebtedness of WMF in connection with
this acquisition. The results of WMF are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from January 2004 forward.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Sale of the Asset Management Business
On December 1, 2005, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of its Asset Management Business to Legg Mason, Inc. (Legg Mason) in exchange for Legg Masons broker-dealer and capital markets
businesses, $2.298 billion of Legg Masons common and preferred shares (valued as of the closing date), and $500 million in cash. This cash was obtained via a lending facility provided by Citigroup CIB business. The transaction did not include
Citigroups asset management business in Mexico, its retirement services business in Latin America (both of which are included in International Retail Banking) or its interest in the CitiStreet joint venture (which is
included in Smith Barney). The total value of the transaction at the time of closing was approximately $4.369 billion, resulting in an after-tax gain to Citigroup of approximately $2.082 billion ($3.404 billion pretax, which was reported in
discontinued operations).
Concurrently, Citigroup sold Legg Masons capital markets business to Stifel Financial Corp. The business
consisted of areas in which Citigroup already had full capabilities, including investment banking, institutional equity sales and trading, taxable fixed income sales and trading, and research. No gain or loss was recognized from this transaction.
(The transactions described in these two paragraphs are referred to as the Sale of the Asset Management Business.)
In
connection with this sale, Citigroup and Legg Mason entered into a three-year agreement under which Citigroup will continue to offer its clients Asset Managements products, will become the primary retail distributor of the Legg Mason
funds managed by Legg Mason Capital Management Inc., and may also distribute other Legg Mason products. These products will be offered primarily through Citigroups Global Wealth Management businesses, Smith Barney and Private
Bank, as well as through Primerica and Citibank. The distribution of these products will be subject to applicable requirements of law and Citigroups suitability standards and product requirements.
118
Upon completion of the Sale of the Asset Management Business, Citigroup added 1,226 financial advisors in 124 branch offices to its Global Wealth
Management Business.
On January 31, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its Asset Management Business within Bank Handlowy (an indirect
banking subsidiary of Citigroup located in Poland) to Legg Mason. This transaction, which was originally part of the overall Asset Management Business sold to Legg Mason Inc. on December 1, 2005, was postponed due to delays in obtaining local
regulatory approval. A gain from this sale of $18 million after-tax and minority interest ($31 million pretax and minority interest) was recognized in the 2006 first quarter within discontinued operations.
During March 2006, the Company sold 10.3 million shares of Legg Mason stock through an underwritten public offering. The net sale proceeds of $1.258
billion resulted in a pretax gain of $24 million in Alternative Investments.
In September 2006, the Company received from Legg Mason the
final closing adjustment payment related to this sale. This payment resulted in an additional after-tax gain of $51 million ($83 million pretax), recorded in discontinued operations.
Results for all of the businesses included in the Sale of the Asset Management Business, including the gain, are reported as discontinued operations for
all periods presented. Changes in the market value of the Legg Mason common and preferred shares since the closing of the transaction are included in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity within Accumulated other
comprehensive income (net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of taxes). Any effects on the Companys current earnings related to these securities, such as dividend revenue, are included in the results of
Alternative Investments.
The following is summarized financial information for discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to
the Sale of the Asset Management Business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
4,599 |
|
$ |
1,383 |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
203 |
Gain on sale |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
112 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(324 |
) |
|
$ |
146 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations related to the Sale of the Asset Management Business as of
December 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
December 1, 2005 |
Assets |
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
96 |
Investments |
|
|
3 |
Intangible assets |
|
|
776 |
Other assets |
|
|
563 |
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,438 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
575 |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
575 |
Sale of the Life Insurance & Annuities Business
On July 1, 2005, the Company completed the sale of Citigroups Travelers Life & Annuity and substantially all of Citigroups international insurance businesses to MetLife, Inc. (MetLife). The
businesses sold were the primary vehicles through which Citigroup engaged in the Life Insurance & Annuities Business.
Citigroup
received $1.0 billion in MetLife equity securities and $10.830 billion in cash, which resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $2.120 billion ($3.386 billion pretax), which was reported in discontinued operations.
This transaction encompassed Travelers Life & Annuitys U.S. businesses and its international operations other than Citigroups life
insurance business in Mexico (which is now included within International Retail Banking). International operations included wholly owned insurance companies in the United Kingdom, Belgium, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, and Poland;
joint ventures in Japan and Hong Kong; and offices in China. This transaction also included Citigroups Argentine pension business. (The transaction described in the preceding three paragraphs is referred to as the Sale of the Life
Insurance & Annuities Business.)
In connection with the Sale of the Life Insurance & Annuities Business, Citigroup
and MetLife entered into 10-year agreements under which Travelers Life & Annuity and MetLife products will be made available through certain Citigroup distribution channels.
During the 2006 first quarter, $15 million of the total $657 million federal tax contingency reserve release was reported within discontinued operations
as it related to the Life Insurance & Annuities Business sold to MetLife.
In July 2006, Citigroup recognized an $85 million after-tax
gain from the sale of MetLife shares. This gain was reported within income from continuing operations in the Alternative Investments business.
In July 2006, the Company received the final closing adjustment payment related to this sale, resulting in an after-tax gain of $75 million ($115 million pretax), which was recorded in discontinued operations.
In addition, during the 2006 third quarter, a release of $42 million of deferred tax liabilities was reported within discontinued operations as it related
to the Life Insurance & Annuities Business sold to MetLife.
Results for all of the businesses included in the Sale of the Life
Insurance & Annuities Business are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
119
Summarized financial information for discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the Sale of the Life Insurance & Annuities Business is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
6,128 |
|
|
$ |
5,172 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
Gain on sale |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
3,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
901 |
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(2,989 |
) |
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
(4,695 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(102 |
) |
The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations related to the
Sale of the Life Insurance & Annuities Business as of July 1, 2005, the date of the distribution:
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
July 1, 2005 |
Assets |
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
158 |
Investments |
|
|
48,860 |
Intangible assets |
|
|
86 |
Other assets (1) |
|
|
44,123 |
Total assets |
|
$ |
93,227 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
971 |
Other liabilities (2) |
|
|
82,842 |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
83,813 |
(1) |
At June 30, 2005, other assets consisted of separate and variable accounts of $30,828 million, reinsurance recoverables of $4,048 million, and other of $9,247 million.
|
(2) |
At June 30, 2005, other liabilities consisted of contractholder funds and separate and variable accounts of $66,139 million, insurance policy and claims reserves of $14,370 million, and
other of $2,333 million. |
In addition to the accounting policies outlined in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
on page 109, the following represents the policies specifically related to the Life Insurance & Annuities Business that was sold:
Separate and Variable
Accounts
Separate and variable accounts primarily represent funds for which investment income and investment gains/losses accrue directly to, and
investment risk is borne by, the contractholders. The assets of each account are legally segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the Company. The assets of these accounts are generally carried at market
value. Amounts assessed to the contractholders for management services are included in revenues. Deposits, net investment income and realized investment gains and losses for these accounts are excluded from revenues, and related liability increases
are excluded from benefits and expenses.
Contractholder Funds
Contractholder funds represent receipts from the issuance
of universal life, pension investment and certain deferred annuity contracts. Such receipts are considered deposits on investment contracts that do not have substantial mortality or morbidity risk. Account balances are increased by deposits received
and interest credited and are reduced by withdrawals, mortality charges and administrative expenses charged to the contractholders.
The Spin-Off of Travelers
Property Casualty Corp. (TPC)
During the 2006 first quarter, releases from various tax contingency reserves were recorded as the IRS concluded their
tax audits for the years 1999 through 2002. Included in these releases was $44 million related to Travelers Property Casualty Corp., which the Company spun off during 2002. This release has been included in the provision for income taxes within the
results for discontinued operations.
Combined Results for Discontinued Operations
Summarized financial information for the Life Insurance & Annuities Business, Asset Management Business, and TPC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
10,727 |
|
$ |
6,555 |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
908 |
|
$ |
1,446 |
Gain on sale |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
454 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
4,832 |
|
$ |
992 |
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(3,313 |
) |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
109 |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
(4,704 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
Net cash (used in) discontinued operations |
|
$ |
109 |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
4. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Citigroup is a diversified bank holding company whose businesses provide a broad range of financial
services to consumer and corporate customers around the world. The Companys activities are conducted through the Global Consumer, Corporate and Investment Banking, Global Wealth Management, and Alternative Investments business segments.
The Global Consumer segment includes a global, full-service consumer franchise delivering a wide array of banking, lending, insurance and
investment services through a network of local branches, offices, and electronic delivery systems.
The businesses included in the
Companys Corporate and Investment Banking segment provide corporations, governments, institutions, and investors in approximately 100 countries with a broad range of banking and financial products and services.
The Global Wealth Management segment is composed of the Smith Barney Private Client businesses, Citigroup Private Bank and Citigroup Investment Research.
Smith Barney provides investment advice, financial planning and brokerage services to affluent individuals, companies, and non-profits. Private Bank provides personalized wealth management services for high net worth clients.
120
The Alternative Investments segment manages capital on behalf of Citigroup (including the ownership of Legg Mason shares) and third-party clients across five
asset classes, including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, structured products and managed futures.
Corporate/Other includes net
treasury results, unallocated corporate expenses, offsets to certain line-item reclassifications (eliminations), the
results of discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of accounting changes and unallocated taxes.
The accounting policies of these reportable segments are the same as those disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 109.
The following table presents certain information regarding the Companys continuing operations by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net of interest expense (1) |
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (2) |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect
of accounting change (1) (2) (3) (4) |
|
Identifiable assets at year end (5) |
In millions of dollars, except identifiable assets in billions |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Global Consumer |
|
$ |
50,299 |
|
|
$ |
48,245 |
|
|
$ |
47,887 |
|
|
$ |
4,666 |
|
|
$ |
4,904 |
|
|
$ |
5,592 |
|
|
$ |
12,056 |
|
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
$ |
11,987 |
|
$ |
702 |
|
$ |
559 |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
27,187 |
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
21,786 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
839 |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
10,177 |
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
|
|
8,529 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
66 |
|
|
63 |
Alternative Investments |
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
Corporate/Other |
|
|
(949 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
20 |
Total |
|
$ |
89,615 |
|
|
$ |
83,642 |
|
|
$ |
79,635 |
|
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
|
$ |
9,078 |
|
|
$ |
6,464 |
|
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
$ |
1,494 |
(1) |
Includes total revenues, net of interest expense, in the U.S. of $49.5 billion, $47.4 billion, and $47.1 billion; in Mexico of $6.1 billion, $5.3 billion, and $4.5 billion; and in Japan of
$3.5 billion, $4.5 billion, and $4.3 billion in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Figures exclude Alternative Investments and Corporate/Other, which largely operate within the U.S. |
(2) |
The effective tax rates for 2006 reflect the impact of the resolution of the Federal Tax Audit and the New York Tax Audits. |
(3) |
Includes pretax provisions (credits) for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the Global Consumer results of $7.6 billion, $9.1 billion, and $8.1 billion; in the Corporate and
Investment Banking results of $359 million, ($42) million, and ($975) million; and in the Global Wealth Management results of $24 million, $29 million, and ($5) million for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Corporate/Other recorded a pretax
provision of $6 million and a pretax credit of ($2) million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Includes pretax credit in the Alternative Investments results of ($13) million in 2006 and ($2) million in 2005. |
(4) |
For 2005, the Company recognized after-tax charges of $49 million for the cumulative effect of accounting change related to the adoption of FIN 47. |
(5) |
Approximately 38% of all identifiable assets at December 31, 2006 are related to foreign operations, compared to 39% at December 31, 2005. |
5. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, interest revenue
and expense consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 (1) |
|
2004 (1) |
Interest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan interest, including fees (2) |
|
$ |
55,022 |
|
$ |
47,083 |
|
$ |
43,734 |
Deposits with banks |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
536 |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
14,199 |
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
5,022 |
Investments, including dividends |
|
|
10,399 |
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
6,203 |
Trading account assets (3) |
|
|
11,865 |
|
|
8,137 |
|
|
6,469 |
Other interest |
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
1,657 |
Total interest revenue |
|
$ |
96,431 |
|
$ |
75,916 |
|
$ |
63,621 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
21,657 |
|
$ |
13,502 |
|
$ |
8,790 |
Trading account liabilities (3) |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
669 |
|
|
306 |
Short-term debt and other liabilities |
|
|
22,257 |
|
|
14,597 |
|
|
7,551 |
Long-term debt |
|
|
11,910 |
|
|
7,908 |
|
|
5,357 |
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
56,943 |
|
$ |
36,676 |
|
$ |
22,004 |
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
39,488 |
|
$ |
39,240 |
|
$ |
41,617 |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,738 |
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
6,233 |
Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
32,750 |
|
$ |
31,311 |
|
$ |
35,384 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
(2) |
2006 includes a $(666) million reduction related to changes in consumer lending laws in Japan. |
(3) |
Interest expense on trading account liabilities of CIB is reported as a reduction of interest revenue for trading account assets. |
6. COMMISSIONS AND FEES
Commissions and fees revenue includes charges to our customers for credit and bank cards, including
transaction-processing fees and annual fees; advisory, and equity and debt underwriting services; lending and deposit-related transactions, such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and other deposit and loan servicing activities;
investment management-related fees including brokerage services, and custody and trust services; insurance fees; and commissions.
The
following table presents commissions and fees revenue for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Credit cards and bank cards |
|
$ |
5,228 |
|
$ |
4,498 |
|
$ |
4,501 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
3,482 |
|
Smith Barney |
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
2,228 |
|
CIB trading-related |
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
1,998 |
|
Checking-related |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
997 |
|
|
1,026 |
|
Transaction services |
|
|
859 |
|
|
739 |
|
|
729 |
|
Corporate finance |
|
|
735 |
|
|
483 |
|
|
456 |
|
Loan servicing (1) |
|
|
660 |
|
|
540 |
|
|
(188 |
) |
Primerica |
|
|
399 |
|
|
374 |
|
|
351 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
514 |
|
|
754 |
|
|
924 |
|
Other CIB |
|
|
243 |
|
|
346 |
|
|
374 |
|
Other |
|
|
58 |
|
|
122 |
|
|
100 |
|
Total commissions and fees |
|
$ |
19,535 |
|
$ |
17,143 |
|
$ |
15,981 |
|
(1) |
Includes fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing assets. |
121
7. PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS REVENUE
Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from
trading activities. Not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities, which is an integral part of trading activities profitability. The following table presents principal transactions revenue
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Fixed income (1) |
|
$ |
1,340 |
|
$ |
2,094 |
|
|
$ |
1,789 |
|
Equities (2) |
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
Foreign exchange (3) |
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
Commodities (4) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
All other (5) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
Total principal transactions revenue |
|
$ |
7,708 |
|
$ |
6,443 |
|
|
$ |
3,716 |
|
(1) |
Includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt, municipal securities, preferred stock, mortgage securities, and other debt instruments. Also includes spot and forward trading
of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) currency options, options on fixed income securities, interest rate swaps, currency swaps, swap options, caps and floors, credit derivatives, financial futures, OTC options, and forward
contracts on fixed income securities. |
(2) |
Includes revenues from common and convertible preferred stock, convertible corporate debt, equity-linked notes, and exchange-traded and OTC equity options and warrants.
|
(3) |
Includes revenues from foreign exchange spot, forward, option and swap contracts, as well as translation gains and losses. |
(4) |
Primarily includes the results of Phibro Inc., which trades crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas, and other commodities. |
(5) |
Includes mark-to-market on the interest-only strip related to the Companys securitized credit card receivables. |
8. INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company has adopted a number of equity compensation plans under which it administers stock options,
restricted or deferred stock and stock purchase programs. The award programs are used to attract, retain and motivate officers, employees and non-employee directors, to compensate them for their contributions to the Company, and to encourage
employee stock ownership. The plans are administered by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Citigroup Board of Directors, which is comprised entirely of independent non-employee directors. At December 31, 2006, approximately
316 million shares were authorized and available for grant under Citigroups stock incentive and stock purchase plans. In accordance with Citigroup practice, shares would be issued out of Treasury stock upon exercise or vesting.
The following compensation expense relates to the Companys stock-based compensation programs as recorded during 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
SFAS 123(R) charges for January 2006 awards issued to retirement-eligible employees |
|
$ |
648 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
SFAS 123(R) charges for estimated awards granted through January 2007 to retirement-eligible employees |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option expense |
|
|
129 |
|
|
137 |
|
|
281 |
Amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards (1) |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
1,515 |
Total |
|
$ |
3,166 |
|
$ |
1,903 |
|
$ |
1,796 |
(1) |
Represents the amortization of the remaining unvested restricted and deferred stock awards granted to all employees prior to 2006. The 2006 period also includes amortization expense for
awards granted to non-retirement-eligible employees in 2006. Also included is amortization of the forfeiture provision on stock awards. |
Stock Award Programs
The Company, primarily through its Capital Accumulation Program (CAP), issues shares of Citigroup common stock in the form of restricted or deferred stock to
participating officers and employees. For all stock award programs, during the applicable vesting period, the shares awarded cannot be sold or transferred by the participant, and the award is subject to cancellation if the participants
employment is terminated. After the award vests, the shares become freely transferable (subject to the stock ownership commitment of senior executives). From the date of award, the recipient of a restricted stock award can direct the vote of the
shares and receive dividend equivalents. Recipients of deferred stock awards receive dividend equivalents, but cannot vote.
Stock awards
granted in January 2006 and 2005 generally vest 25% per year over four years, except for certain employees at Smith Barney whose awards vest after two years. Stock awards granted in 2003 and 2004 generally vest after a two- or three-year
vesting period. CAP participants may elect to receive all or part of their award in stock options. The figures presented in the stock option program tables include options granted under CAP. Unearned compensation expense associated with the stock
awards represents the market value of Citigroup common stock at the date of grant and is recognized as a charge to income ratably over the full vesting period, except for those awards granted to retirement-eligible employees. The charge to income
for awards made to retirement-eligible employees is accelerated based on the dates the retirement rules are met.
CAP and certain other
awards provide that participants who meet certain age and years of service conditions may continue to vest in all or a portion of the award without remaining employed by the Company during the entire vesting period, so long as they do not compete
with Citigroup during that time. Beginning in 2006, awards to these retirement-eligible employees are recognized in the year prior to the grant in the same manner as cash incentive compensation is accrued. However, awards granted in January 2006
were required to be expensed in their entirety at the date of grant. Prior to 2006, such awards were recognized ratably over the stated vesting period. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 109 for the impact of adopting SFAS
123(R).
In 2003, special equity awards were issued to certain employees in the Corporate and Investment Banking, Global Wealth Management
and Citigroup International businesses. These awards were fully vested in January 2006.
From 2003 to 2006, Citigroup granted restricted or
deferred shares annually under the Citigroup Ownership Program (COP) to eligible employees. This program replaced the WealthBuilder, CitiBuilder, and Citigroup Ownership stock option programs. Under COP, employees are issued either restricted or
deferred shares of Citigroup common stock that vest after three years. Unearned compensation expense associated with the stock grants represents the market value of Citigroup common stock at the date of grant and is recognized as a charge to income
ratably over the vesting period, except for those awards granted to retirement-eligible employees. The charge to income for awards made to retirement-eligible employees is accelerated based on the dates the retirement rules are met.
122
A summary of the status of Citigroups unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2006, and changes during the twelve months ended December 31,
2006, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested stock awards |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
Unvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
117,623,501 |
|
|
$ |
44.12 |
Awards |
|
66,162,677 |
|
|
$ |
48.54 |
Cancellations |
|
(7,885,387 |
) |
|
$ |
47.58 |
Deletions |
|
(391,663 |
) |
|
$ |
47.25 |
Vestings |
|
(48,536,363 |
) |
|
$ |
39.56 |
Unvested at December 31, 2006 |
|
126,972,765 |
|
|
$ |
47.94 |
The weighted average market value of the vestings during 2006 was approximately $47.33 per share.
As of December 31, 2006, there was $2.6 billion of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards net of the
forfeiture provision. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
Stock Option Programs
The Company has a number of stock option programs for its non-employee directors, officers and employees. Generally, since January 2005, stock options have been granted
only to CAP participants who elect to receive stock options in lieu of restricted or deferred stock awards, and to non-employee directors who elect to receive their compensation in the form of a stock option grant. All stock options are granted on
Citigroup common stock with exercise prices equal to the fair market value at the time of grant. Options
granted since 2003 have six-year terms; directors options vest after two years and all other options granted since January 2005 typically vest 25% each
year over four years. Options granted in 2004 and 2003 typically vest in thirds each year over three years, with the first vesting date occurring 17 months after the grant date. The sale of shares acquired through the exercise of employee stock
options granted since January 2003 is restricted for a two-year period (and the shares are subject to the stock ownership commitment of senior executives thereafter). Prior to 2003, Citigroup options, including options granted since the date of the
merger of Citicorp and Travelers Group, Inc., generally vested at a rate of 20% per year over five years, with the first vesting date occurring 12 to 18 months following the grant date. Certain options, mostly granted prior to January 1,
2003, permit an employee exercising an option under certain conditions to be granted new options (reload options) in an amount equal to the number of common shares used to satisfy the exercise price and the withholding taxes due upon exercise. The
reload options are granted for the remaining term of the related original option and vest after six months. An option may not be exercised using the reload method unless the market price on the date of exercise is at least 20% greater than the
option exercise price.
To further encourage employee stock ownership, the Companys eligible employees participated in WealthBuilder,
CitiBuilder, or the Citigroup Ownership Program. Options granted under the WealthBuilder and the Citigroup Ownership programs vest over a five-year period, whereas options granted under the CitiBuilder program vest after five years. These options
did not have a reload feature. Options have not been granted under these programs since 2002.
Information with respect to stock
option activity under Citigroup stock option plans for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
Intrinsic value per share |
|
Options |
|
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
Intrinsic value per share |
|
Options |
|
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
Intrinsic value per share |
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
277,255,935 |
|
|
$ |
40.27 |
|
$ |
8.26 |
|
330,910,779 |
|
|
$ |
39.28 |
|
$ |
8.90 |
|
359,376,198 |
|
|
$ |
37.07 |
|
$ |
11.47 |
Granted-original |
|
3,259,547 |
|
|
$ |
48.87 |
|
|
|
|
5,279,863 |
|
|
|
47.45 |
|
|
|
|
27,520,987 |
|
|
|
49.05 |
|
|
|
Granted-reload |
|
12,530,318 |
|
|
$ |
52.30 |
|
|
|
|
3,013,384 |
|
|
|
48.85 |
|
|
|
|
12,725,607 |
|
|
|
49.99 |
|
|
|
Forfeited or exchanged |
|
(14,123,110 |
) |
|
$ |
45.57 |
|
|
3.36 |
|
(17,726,910 |
) |
|
|
44.29 |
|
|
2.33 |
|
(16,606,946 |
) |
|
|
43.27 |
|
|
3.82 |
Expired |
|
(2,021,955 |
) |
|
$ |
44.87 |
|
|
4.06 |
|
(2,572,189 |
) |
|
|
47.70 |
|
|
|
|
(1,635,927 |
) |
|
|
48.12 |
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
(64,832,818 |
) |
|
$ |
36.37 |
|
|
12.56 |
|
(41,648,992 |
) |
|
|
31.72 |
|
|
14.90 |
|
(50,469,140 |
) |
|
|
29.89 |
|
|
17.20 |
Outstanding, end of period |
|
212,067,917 |
|
|
$ |
41.87 |
|
$ |
13.83 |
|
277,255,935 |
|
|
$ |
40.27 |
|
$ |
8.26 |
|
330,910,779 |
|
|
$ |
39.28 |
|
$ |
8.90 |
Exercisable at end of period |
|
179,424,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,497,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,952,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the information about stock options outstanding under Citigroup stock option plans
at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
Options exercisable |
Range of exercise prices |
|
Number outstanding |
|
Weighted average contractual life remaining |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
Number exercisable |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
$7.77$9.99 |
|
4,765 |
|
4.6 years |
|
$ |
7.77 |
|
4,765 |
|
$ |
7.77 |
$10.00$19.99 |
|
2,136,705 |
|
0.8 years |
|
$ |
19.14 |
|
2,135,513 |
|
$ |
19.14 |
$20.00$29.99 |
|
22,571,585 |
|
1.6 years |
|
$ |
22.98 |
|
22,514,416 |
|
$ |
22.98 |
$30.00$39.99 |
|
35,452,847 |
|
2.9 years |
|
$ |
33.07 |
|
33,492,489 |
|
$ |
32.98 |
$40.00$49.99 |
|
131,722,983 |
|
3.8 years |
|
$ |
46.22 |
|
110,938,800 |
|
$ |
46.20 |
$50.00$56.83 |
|
20,179,032 |
|
3.0 years |
|
$ |
52.45 |
|
10,338,917 |
|
$ |
51.91 |
|
|
212,067,917 |
|
3.3 years |
|
$ |
41.87 |
|
179,424,900 |
|
$ |
40.83 |
As of December 31, 2006, there was $54.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to stock options; this cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 11 months.
123
Stock Purchase Program
The Citigroup 2003 Stock Purchase Program, which was
administered under the Citigroup 2000 Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, allowed eligible employees of Citigroup to enter into fixed subscription agreements to purchase shares in the future at the lesser of the market price on the first day of the
offering period or at the market price at the end of the offering period. For the June 15, 2003 offering only, subject to certain limits, enrolled employees were permitted to make one purchase prior to end of the offering period. The purchase
price of the shares was paid with accumulated payroll deductions plus interest. Shares of Citigroups common stock delivered under the Citigroup 2003 Stock Purchase Program were sourced from treasury shares. Offerings under the Citigroup 2003
Stock Purchase Program were made in June 2003 and to new employees in June 2004. The program ended in July 2005.
The following were the
share prices under the Stock Purchase Program: The fixed price for the June 2003 offering was $44.10, and the fixed price for the June 2004 offering was $46.74. The market price at the end of the program was $46.50. The shares under the June 2003
offering were purchased at the offering price ($44.10), which was the market price at the start of the offering period. The shares under the June 2004 offering were purchased at the market price at the closing of the program ($46.50).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Outstanding subscribed shares at beginning of year |
|
|
|
7,112,678 |
|
|
8,336,245 |
|
Subscriptions entered into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,144 |
. |
Shares purchased |
|
|
|
(4,498,358 |
) |
|
(365,591 |
) |
Canceled or terminated |
|
|
|
(2,614,320 |
) |
|
(1,353,120 |
) |
Outstanding subscribed shares at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,112,678 |
|
Fair Value Assumptions
SFAS 123(R) requires that reload options be treated as separate grants from the related original grants. Pursuant to the terms of currently outstanding reloadable options, upon exercise of an option, if employees use previously owned shares
to pay the exercise price and surrender shares otherwise to be received for related tax withholding, they will receive a reload option covering the same number of shares used for such purposes, but only if the market price on the date of exercise is
at least 20% greater than the option exercise price. Reload options vest after six months and carry the same expiration date as the option that gave rise to the reload grant. The exercise price of a reload grant is the fair market value of Citigroup
common stock on the date the underlying option was exercised. Reload options are intended to encourage employees to exercise options at an earlier date and to retain the shares acquired. The result of this program is that employees generally will
exercise options as soon as they are able and, therefore, these options have shorter expected lives. Shorter option lives result in lower valuations. However, such values are expensed more quickly due to the shorter vesting period of reload options.
In addition, since reload options are treated as separate grants, the existence of the reload feature results in a greater number of options being valued. Shares received through option exercises under the reload program, as well as certain other
options, are subject to restrictions on sale.
Additional valuation and related assumption information for Citigroup option plans is presented below. Since 2004, Citigroup has used a lattice-type model to value stock options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For options granted during |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Weighted average per share fair value, at December 31 |
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
|
$ |
7.23 |
|
|
$ |
6.82 |
|
Weighted averaged expected life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original grants |
|
|
4.57 yrs. |
|
|
|
5.26 yrs. |
|
|
|
4.54 yrs. |
|
Reload grants |
|
|
2.56 yrs. |
|
|
|
3.29 yrs. |
|
|
|
3.28 yrs. |
|
Stock Purchase Program grants |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1.07 yrs. |
|
Valuation assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
20.15 |
% |
|
|
25.06 |
% |
|
|
25.98 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
2.96 |
% |
Expected annual forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original and reload grants |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Stock Purchase Program grants |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
9. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all
U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The U.S. qualified defined benefit plan provides benefits under a cash balance formula. Employees satisfying certain
age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final pay formula under that plan. The Company also offers postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible
employees outside the United States.
The following tables summarize the components of net expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement
of Income and the funded status and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Companys U.S. qualified pension plan, post retirement plans and significant plans outside the United States. The Company uses a December 31
measurement date for the U.S. plans as well as the plans outside the United States.
124
Net Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
|
U.S. plans (1) |
|
|
Plans outside U.S. |
|
|
U.S. plans |
|
|
Plans outside U.S. |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (benefit) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Curtailment (gain) loss (2) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
(1) |
The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the net expense was $51 million in 2006, $50 million in 2005, and $44 million in 2004. |
(2) |
In 2006, the Company announced that commencing January 1, 2008, the U.S. qualified pension plan would be frozen. Accordingly, no additional contributions would be credited to the cash
balance plan for existing plan participants. However, employees still covered under the prior final pay plan will continue to accrue benefits. |
The estimated net actuarial loss, prior service benefit and net transition obligation that will be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into net expense in 2007 are $176 million, $(3) million and $2 million,
respectively, for defined benefit pension plans. For postretirement plans, $15 million and $(3) million are expected to be amortized for the estimated net actuarial loss and prior service benefit, respectively.
125
Net Amount Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
|
U.S. plans (1) |
|
|
Plans outside U.S. |
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
|
Plans outside U.S. |
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change in projected benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
10,984 |
|
|
$ |
10,249 |
|
|
$ |
4,552 |
|
|
$ |
4,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
Benefits earned during the year |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Plan amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Medicare Part D Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Projected benefit obligation at year end |
|
$ |
11,109 |
|
|
$ |
10,984 |
|
|
$ |
5,363 |
|
|
$ |
4,552 |
|
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year |
|
$ |
10,981 |
|
|
$ |
10,379 |
|
|
$ |
4,784 |
|
|
$ |
4,190 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Company contributions |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Plan assets at fair value at year end |
|
$ |
11,932 |
|
|
$ |
10,981 |
|
|
$ |
5,906 |
|
|
$ |
4,784 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
Reconciliation of prepaid (accrued) benefit cost and total amount recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of the plan at year-end |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
(926 |
) |
|
$ |
(982 |
) |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
Unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition obligation |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (benefit) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit asset |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
908 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Benefit liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Prepaid benefit cost |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
Accrued benefit liability |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Intangible asset |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Prior service cost (benefit) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net amount recognized in equitypretax |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net amount recognized on the balance sheet |
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
1,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
$ |
(840 |
) |
|
$ |
(812 |
) |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation at year end |
|
$ |
10,982 |
|
|
$ |
10,734 |
|
|
$ |
4,846 |
|
|
$ |
4,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
(1) |
The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified unfunded pension plans, for which the aggregate projected benefit obligation was $660 million and $671 million, and the aggregate accumulated benefit
obligation was $646 million and $648 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes pretax charges of $133 million as a result of adopting SFAS 158 and $141 million related to an
additional minimum liability adjustment for U.S. nonqualified plans at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
126
At the end of 2006 and 2005 for both qualified and non-qualified plans, and both funded and unfunded plans, the aggregate projected benefit obligation (PBO),
the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation (ABO), and the
aggregate fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, and pension plans with an accumulated
benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO exceeds fair value of plan assets |
|
ABO exceeds fair value of plan assets |
|
|
U.S. plans |
|
Plans outside U.S. |
|
U.S. plans |
|
Plans outside U.S. |
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
660 |
|
$ |
11,655 |
|
$ |
2,832 |
|
$ |
1,613 |
|
$ |
660 |
|
$ |
671 |
|
$ |
694 |
|
$ |
691 |
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
|
646 |
|
|
11,382 |
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
646 |
|
|
648 |
|
|
632 |
|
|
634 |
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
493 |
Combined plan assets for the U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans, excluding U.S. non-qualified plans,
exceeded the accumulated benefit obligations by $2.0 billion and $910 million at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Assumptions
The discount rate and future rate of compensation assumptions used in determining pension and postretirement benefit obligations and net benefit
expense for the Companys plans are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. plans: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension (2) |
|
5.9 |
% |
|
5.6 |
% |
Postretirement |
|
5.7 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
Plans outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
2.25 to 11.0 |
|
|
2.0 to 12.0 |
|
Weighted average |
|
6.5 |
|
|
7.0 |
|
Future compensation increase rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans (1)(3) |
|
4.0 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
Plans outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
1.0 to 10.0 |
|
|
2.0 to 9.0 |
|
Weighted average |
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
During the year |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. plans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension (2) |
|
5.6 |
% |
|
5.75 |
% |
Postretirement |
|
5.5 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
Plan outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
2.0 to 12.0 |
|
|
2.0 to 10.0 |
|
Weighted average |
|
7.0 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Future compensation increase rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans (1) (3) |
|
4.0 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
Plans outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
2.0 to 9.0 |
|
|
1.5 to 9.0 |
|
Weighted average |
|
4.2 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
(1) |
Weighted average rates for the U.S. plans equal the stated rates. |
(2) |
At September 30, 2006, the discount rate was changed from 5.6% to 5.9% to reflect the remeasurement due to the pension plan curtailment. |
(3) |
Future compensation increase rate for small groups of grandfathered employees is 3.0% or 6.0%. |
A one percentage-point change in the discount rates would have the following effects on pension expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One percentage-point increase |
|
|
One percentage-point decrease |
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Effect on pension expense for U.S. plans |
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
146 |
|
$ |
140 |
Effect on pension expense for foreign plans |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
306 |
Assumed health care cost trend rates were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Health care cost increase rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following year |
|
9.0 |
% |
|
10.0 |
% |
Ultimate rate to which cost increase is assumed to decline |
|
5.0 |
% |
|
5.0 |
% |
Year in which the ultimate rate is reached |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
127
A one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One percentage- point increase |
|
One percentage- point decrease |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Effect on benefits earned and interest cost for U.S. plans |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for U.S. Plans |
|
|
79 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Citigroup considers the expected rate of return to be a longer-term assessment of return expectations, based on each plans expected asset
allocation, and does not anticipate changing this assumption annually unless there are significant changes in economic conditions or portfolio composition. Market performance over a number of earlier years is evaluated
covering a wide range of economic conditions to determine whether there are sound reasons for projecting forward any past trends.
The expected long-term rates of return on assets used in determining the Companys pension expense and postretirement expense are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Rate of return on assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. plans (1) |
|
8.0 |
% |
|
8.0 |
% |
Plans outside the U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
3.25% to 10.0 |
% |
|
3.25% to 10.0 |
% |
Weighted average |
|
8.9 |
% |
|
6.6 |
% |
(1) |
Weighted average rates for the U.S. plans equal the stated rates. |
A one
percentage-point change in the expected rates of return would have the following effects on pension expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One percentage-point increase |
|
|
One percentage-point decrease |
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Effect on pension expense for U.S. plans |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
$ |
110 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
94 |
Effect on pension expense for foreign plans |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
118 |
Plan Assets
Citigroups pension and postretirement plan asset allocation for the U.S. plans at the end of 2006 and 2005, and the target allocation for 2007 by asset category based on asset fair values are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target asset allocation |
|
U.S. pension assets at December 31 |
|
|
U.S. postretirement assets at December 31 |
|
Asset Category |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
Equity securities |
|
15% to 40% |
|
35 |
% |
|
44 |
% |
|
35 |
% |
|
44 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
13.5 to 43.5 |
|
18 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
13 |
|
Real estate |
|
6 to 12 |
|
7 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
5 |
|
Other investments |
|
18 to 49.5 |
|
40 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
38 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
Equity securities in the U.S.
pension plans include Citigroup common stock with a fair value of $141 million or 1.2% of plan assets and $122 million or 1.1% of plan assets at the end of 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Affiliated and third-party investment managers and affiliated advisors provide their respective services to Citigroups U.S. pension plans. Assets
are rebalanced as the plan investment committee deems appropriate. Citigroups
investment strategy with respect to its pension assets is to maintain a globally diversified investment portfolio across several asset classes targeting an
annual rate of return of 8% that, when combined with Citigroups contributions to the plans, will maintain the plans ability to meet all required benefit obligations.
128
Citigroups pension and postretirement plans weighted average asset allocations for the non-U.S. plans and the actual ranges at the end of 2006
and 2005, and the weighted average target allocations for 2007 by asset category based on asset fair values are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. pension plans |
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Actual range |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
Target asset allocation |
|
|
at December 31 |
|
|
at December 31 |
|
Asset Category |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Equity securities |
|
57.3 |
% |
|
0.0% to 79.6 |
% |
|
0.0% to 80.4 |
% |
|
57.8 |
% |
|
57.3 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
39.4 |
|
|
0.0 to 100 |
|
|
0.0 to 96.0 |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
37.9 |
|
Real estate |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.0 to 46.8 |
|
|
0.0 to 21.2 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
Other investments |
|
3.2 |
|
|
0.0 to 100 |
|
|
0.0 to 100 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
Non-U.S. postretirement plans |
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Actual range |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
Target asset allocation |
|
|
at December 31 |
|
|
at December 31 |
|
Asset Category |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 (1) |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
Equity securities |
|
50.0 |
% |
|
0.0% to 50.0 |
% |
|
17.5% to 46.5 |
% |
|
44.6 |
% |
|
46.5 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
32.5 |
|
|
0.0 to 85.0 |
|
|
43.0 to 82.5 |
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
43.0 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
17.5 |
|
|
0.0 to 17.5 |
|
|
0.0 to 10.5 |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
|
The weighted average asset allocation is affected by the assets of one plan only, as the assets in the other postretirement plans are insignificant and do not affect the weighting.
|
Citigroups global pension and postretirement funds investment strategies are to invest in a prudent manner for the exclusive purpose of
providing benefits to participants. The investment strategies are targeted to produce a total return that, when combined with Citigroups contributions to the funds, will maintain the funds ability to meet all required benefit
obligations. Risk is controlled through diversification of asset types and investments in domestic and international equities, fixed income securities and cash. The target asset allocation in most locations outside the U.S. is 50% equities and 50%
debt securities. These allocations may vary by geographic region and country depending on the nature of applicable obligations and various other regional considerations. The wide variation in the actual range of plan asset allocations for the funded
non-U.S. plans is a result of differing local economic conditions. For example, in certain countries local law requires that all pension plan assets must be invested in fixed income investments, or in government funds, or in local country
securities.
Contributions
As a result of new requirements in
SFAS 158, Citigroups revised pension funding policy for U.S. plans and non-U.S. plans is generally to fund to applicable minimum funding requirements rather than to the amounts of accumulated benefit obligations. For the U.S. plans, the
Company may increase its contributions above the minimum required contribution under ERISA, if appropriate, to its tax and cash position and the plans funded position. At December 31, 2006, there were no minimum required contributions,
and no discretionary or non-cash contributions are currently planned. Discretionary contributions in 2007 for the non-U.S. pension plans are anticipated to be approximately $123 million. For 2007, there are no
expected or required contributions for the U.S. postretirement benefit plans and $0.4 million of contributions are expected for the non-U.S. postretirement
benefit plans. These estimates are subject to change, since contribution decisions are affected by various factors, such as market performance and regulatory requirements; in addition, management has the ability to change funding policy.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The Company expects to pay the following
estimated benefit payments in future years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. plans |
|
Plans outside U.S. |
In millions of
dollars |
|
Pension benefits |
|
Pension benefits |
|
Postretirement benefits |
2007 |
|
$ |
644 |
|
$ |
234 |
|
$ |
31 |
2008 |
|
|
682 |
|
|
232 |
|
|
33 |
2009 |
|
|
709 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
35 |
2010 |
|
|
738 |
|
|
261 |
|
|
36 |
2011 |
|
|
766 |
|
|
279 |
|
|
39 |
2012-2016 |
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
238 |
In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the
Act of 2003) was enacted. The Act of 2003 established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare known as Medicare Part D, and a federal subsidy to sponsors of U.S. retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit
that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The benefits provided to certain participants are at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D and, accordingly, the Company is entitled to a subsidy.
129
With respect to this, Citigroup adopted FSP FAS 106-2 retroactive to the beginning of 2004. The expected subsidy reduced the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation (APBO) by approximately $154 million and $130 million as of January 1, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and the 2006 and 2005 postretirement expense by approximately $24 million and $19 million, respectively, for all of the
postretirement welfare plans for 2006 and 2005.
The following table shows the estimated future benefit payments without the effect of the
subsidy and the amounts of the expected subsidy in future years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected U.S. postretirement benefit payments |
In millions of dollars |
|
Before Medicare Part D Subsidy |
|
Medicare Part D Subsidy |
2007 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
12 |
2008 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
13 |
2009 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
13 |
2010 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
13 |
2011 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
13 |
20122016 |
|
$ |
513 |
|
$ |
66 |
Citigroup 401(k)
Under
the Citigroup 401(k) plan, eligible employees receive matching contributions of up to 3% of their compensation, subject to an annual maximum of $1,500, invested in the Citigroup common stock fund. The pretax expense associated with this plan
amounted to approximately $77 million in 2006, $70 million in 2005, and $69 million in 2004.
In connection with the announced changes to
the U.S. qualified pension plan, the Company will increase its contributions to the Citigroup 401(k) plan. Beginning in 2008, the eligible employees will receive a matching contribution of up to 6% of their compensation and a fixed contribution of
2% of their total compensation.
10. INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
3,850 |
|
|
$ |
3,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,879 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
State |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
Total current income taxes |
|
$ |
8,011 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
|
$ |
7,673 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(579 |
) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
(1,307 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
397 |
|
State |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
Total deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
(181 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
Provision for income tax on continuing operations before minority interest (1) |
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
|
$ |
9,078 |
|
|
$ |
6,464 |
|
Provision for income tax on discontinued operations |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes on cumulative effect of accounting changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) reported in stockholders' equity related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Employee stock plans |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
Pension liability adjustments |
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes before minority interest |
|
$ |
6,332 |
|
|
$ |
10,460 |
|
|
$ |
6,359 |
|
(1) |
Includes the effect of securities transactions resulting in a provision of $627 million in 2006, $687 million in 2005 and $291 million in 2004. |
The reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate applicable to income from continuing operations
(before minority interest and the cumulative effect of accounting changes) for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Federal statutory rate |
|
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
1.6 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
Foreign income tax rate differential |
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
(4.5 |
) |
Audit settlements (2) |
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(1.3 |
) |
Tax advantaged investments |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
(1.6 |
) |
Other, net |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
Effective income tax rate |
|
27.3 |
% |
|
30.8 |
% |
|
28.4 |
% |
(2) |
For 2006, relates to the resolution of the Federal and New York Tax Audits. |
130
Deferred income taxes at December 31 related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss deduction |
|
$ |
2,497 |
|
|
$ |
2,597 |
|
Deferred compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
Restructuring and settlement reserves |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
Unremitted foreign earnings |
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
2,635 |
|
Interest-related items |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
State tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
14,450 |
|
|
$ |
12,356 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance |
|
$ |
14,450 |
|
|
$ |
12,340 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
$ |
(1,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,294 |
) |
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of insurance in force |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
Leases |
|
|
(2,195 |
) |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
Fixed assets |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
Intangibles |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
(808 |
) |
Other deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2,314 |
) |
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
(9,763 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,778 |
) |
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
4,687 |
|
|
$ |
3,562 |
|
Foreign pre-tax earnings approximated $11.8 billion in 2006, $10.6 billion in 2005, and $10.5
billion in 2004. As a U.S. corporation, Citigroup and its U.S. subsidiaries are subject to U.S. taxation currently on all foreign pre-tax earnings earned by a foreign branch. Pre-tax earnings of a foreign subsidiary or affiliate are subject to U.S.
taxation when effectively repatriated. The Company provides income taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries except to the extent that such earnings are indefinitely invested outside the United States. At December 31, 2006,
$14.7 billion of accumulated undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries were indefinitely invested. At the existing U.S. federal income tax rate, additional taxes (net of U.S. foreign tax credits) of $4.4 billion would have to be provided
if such earnings were remitted currently. The current years effect on the income tax expense from continuing operations is included in the Foreign income tax rate differential line in the reconciliation of the federal statutory
rate to the Companys effective income tax rate on the previous page.
The Homeland Investment Act provision of the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (2004 Tax Act) provided companies with a one-time 85% reduction in the U.S. net tax liability on cash dividends paid by foreign subsidiaries in 2005, to the extent that they exceed a baseline level of
dividends paid in prior years. In 2005, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $198 million in continuing operations, net of the impact of remitting income earned in 2005 and prior years that would have been indefinitely invested overseas.
Income taxes are not provided for on the Companys savings bank base year bad debt reserves that arose before 1988 because
under current U.S. tax rules such taxes will become payable only to the extent such amounts are distributed in excess of limits prescribed by federal law. At December 31, 2006, the amount of the base year reserves totaled approximately
$358 million (subject to a tax of $125 million).
There was a $16 million decrease in the valuation allowance related to deferred state
tax assets in 2006, and as a result, there is no valuation allowance at December 31, 2006.
Management believes that the realization of
the recognized net deferred tax asset of $4,687 million is more likely than not based on existing carryback ability and expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company, which has a history of
consistent earnings, has reported pre-tax financial statement income from continuing operations of approximately $27 billion, on average, over the last three years.
131
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings
per share computations for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share amounts |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
21,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
16,054 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Income available to common stockholders for basic EPS |
|
|
21,474 |
|
|
|
24,521 |
|
|
|
16,978 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders for diluted EPS |
|
$ |
21,474 |
|
|
$ |
24,521 |
|
|
$ |
16,978 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS |
|
|
4,887.3 |
|
|
|
5,067.6 |
|
|
|
5,107.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
Restricted and deferred stock |
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS |
|
|
4,986.1 |
|
|
|
5,160.4 |
|
|
|
5,207.4 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
4.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
|
$ |
4.84 |
|
|
$ |
3.32 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4.31 |
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004,
weighted average options of 69.1 million, 99.2 million, and 98.4 million shares, respectively, with weighted average exercise prices of $49.98, $49.44, and $49.60 per share, respectively, were
excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Companys
common stock.
12. FEDERAL FUNDS, SECURITIES BORROWED, LOANED, AND SUBJECT TO REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Federal funds sold and securities
borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
30 |
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
120,603 |
|
|
119,377 |
Deposits paid for securities borrowed |
|
|
162,181 |
|
|
98,057 |
Total |
|
$ |
282,817 |
|
$ |
217,464 |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, at their respective carrying
values, consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Federal funds purchased |
|
$ |
18,316 |
|
$ |
9,821 |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
270,542 |
|
|
198,730 |
Deposits received for securities loaned |
|
|
60,377 |
|
|
33,841 |
Total |
|
$ |
349,235 |
|
$ |
242,392 |
The resale and repurchase agreements represent collateralized financing transactions used to
generate net interest income and facilitate trading activity. These instruments are collateralized principally by government and
government agency securities and generally have terms ranging from overnight to up to a year. It is the Companys policy to take possession of the
underlying collateral, monitor its market value relative to the amounts due under the agreements, and, when necessary, require prompt transfer of additional collateral or reduction in the balance in order to maintain contractual margin protection.
In the event of counterparty default, the financing agreement provides the Company with the right to liquidate the collateral held. Resale agreements and repurchase agreements are reported net by counterparty, when applicable, pursuant to FASB
Interpretation No. 41, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements (FIN 41). Excluding the impact of FIN 41, resale agreements totaled $165.7 billion and $230.8 billion at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Deposits paid for securities borrowed and deposits received for securities loaned are recorded at the amount
of cash advanced or received and are collateralized principally by government and government agency securities, corporate debt and equity securities. Securities borrowed transactions require the Company to deposit cash with the lender. With respect
to securities loaned, the Company receives cash collateral in an amount generally in excess of the market value of securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and securities loaned daily, and additional collateral
is obtained as necessary. Securities borrowed and securities loaned are reported net by counterparty, when applicable, pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts (FIN 39).
132
13. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKERAGE PAYABLES
The Company has receivables and payables for financial instruments
purchased from and sold to brokers and dealers and customers. The Company is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers and dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold, in which case the Company
would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices. Credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction.
The Company seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance
with regulatory and internal guidelines. Margin levels are monitored daily, and customers deposit additional collateral as required. Where customers cannot meet collateral requirements, the Company will liquidate sufficient underlying financial
instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level.
Exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility,
which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to the Company. Credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and brokers and dealers engaged in forwards and futures and other transactions deemed to be credit
sensitive.
Brokerage receivables and brokerage payables, which arise in the normal course of business, consisted of the following at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Receivables from customers |
|
$ |
27,408 |
|
$ |
29,394 |
Receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations |
|
|
17,037 |
|
|
13,429 |
Total brokerage receivables |
|
$ |
44,445 |
|
$ |
42,823 |
Payables to customers |
|
$ |
46,185 |
|
$ |
46,184 |
Payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations |
|
|
38,934 |
|
|
24,810 |
Total brokerage payables |
|
$ |
85,119 |
|
$ |
70,994 |
14. TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Trading account assets and liabilities, at fair value, consisted of the following
at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Trading account assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities |
|
$ |
44,661 |
|
$ |
38,771 |
State and municipal securities |
|
|
17,358 |
|
|
17,856 |
Foreign government securities |
|
|
33,057 |
|
|
21,266 |
Corporate and other debt securities |
|
|
93,891 |
|
|
60,137 |
Derivatives (1) |
|
|
49,541 |
|
|
47,414 |
Equity securities |
|
|
92,518 |
|
|
64,553 |
Mortgage loans and collateralized mortgage securities |
|
|
37,104 |
|
|
27,852 |
Other |
|
|
25,795 |
|
|
17,971 |
Total trading account assets |
|
$ |
393,925 |
|
$ |
295,820 |
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, not yet purchased |
|
$ |
71,083 |
|
$ |
59,780 |
Derivatives (1) |
|
|
74,804 |
|
|
61,328 |
Total trading account liabilities |
|
$ |
145,887 |
|
$ |
121,108 |
(1) |
Pursuant to master netting agreements. |
In determining the fair
value of our trading portfolio, management also reviews the length of time trading positions have been held to identify aged inventory. During 2006, the monthly average aged trading inventory designated as available-for-immediate-sale was
approximately $12.8 billion compared with $8.8 billion in 2005. Inventory positions that are both aged and whose values are unverified amounted to $1.1 billion compared to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The fair value
of aged-inventory is actively monitored and, when appropriate, is discounted to reflect the implied illiquidity for positions that have been available-for-immediate-sale for longer than 90 days. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, such valuation
adjustments amounted to $129 million and $96 million, respectively.
133
15. INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Fixed income securities, substantially all available-for-sale at fair value |
|
$ |
254,107 |
|
$ |
163,177 |
Equity securities |
|
|
19,447 |
|
|
17,212 |
Short-term and other |
|
|
37 |
|
|
208 |
Total |
|
$ |
273,591 |
|
$ |
180,597 |
The amortized cost and fair value of investments in fixed income and equity securities at December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
In millions of dollars |
|
Amortized cost |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
Fair value |
|
Amortized cost |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
Fair value |
Fixed income securities held to maturity (1) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2 |
Fixed income securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, principally obligations of U.S. Federal agencies |
|
|
82,443 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
292 |
|
|
82,413 |
|
|
13,157 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
12,937 |
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies |
|
|
24,872 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
353 |
|
|
24,531 |
|
|
28,448 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
432 |
|
|
28,034 |
State and municipal |
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
512 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
15,654 |
|
|
13,090 |
|
|
512 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
13,581 |
Foreign government |
|
|
73,943 |
|
|
567 |
|
|
727 |
|
|
73,783 |
|
|
67,823 |
|
|
439 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
67,874 |
U.S. corporate |
|
|
32,311 |
|
|
381 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
32,455 |
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
312 |
|
|
307 |
|
|
25,055 |
Other debt securities |
|
|
25,071 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
25,270 |
|
|
15,665 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
15,694 |
Total fixed income securities available-for-sale (2) |
|
$ |
253,793 |
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
$ |
254,107 |
|
$ |
163,235 |
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
$ |
163,177 |
Equity securities (3) |
|
$ |
17,121 |
|
$ |
2,848 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
$ |
19,447 |
|
$ |
14,392 |
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
$ |
167 |
|
$ |
17,212 |
(1) |
Recorded at amortized cost. |
(2) |
Includes fixed income securities, held to maturity. |
(3) |
Includes non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value of $15.466 billion and $11.175 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The related gross unrealized gains and
losses, which were recognized in earnings, were $1.619 billion and $263 million as of December 31, 2006, respectively, and $1.165 billion and $146 million as of December 31, 2005, respectively. |
At December 31, 2006, the cost of approximately 5,000 investments in equity and fixed income securities exceeded their fair value by $1.941 billion.
Of the $1.941 billion, the gross unrealized loss on equity securities was $259 million. Of the remainder, $434 million represents fixed income investments that have been in a gross unrealized loss position for less than a year, and of these 97% are
rated investment grade; $1,248 million represents fixed income investments that have been in a gross unrealized loss position for a year or more, and of these 96% are rated investment grade.
Management has determined that the unrealized losses on the Companys investments in equity and fixed income securities at December 31, 2006 are
temporary in nature. The Company conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible impairment. An investment in a debt or equity security is impaired if its fair value falls below its cost and the
decline is considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost; the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and the Companys ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow
for any anticipated recovery. The Companys review for impairment generally entails:
|
|
Identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible impairment; |
|
|
Analysis of individual investments that have fair values significantly less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has
been in an unrealized loss position; |
|
|
Discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary
impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and |
|
|
Documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business policies. |
134
The table below shows the
fair value of investments in fixed income and equity securities that are available-for-sale and that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or longer |
|
Total |
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
Fair value |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
Fair value |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
Fair value |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, principally obligations of U.S. federal agencies |
|
$ |
26,817 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
$ |
4,172 |
|
$ |
239 |
|
$ |
30,989 |
|
$ |
292 |
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
4,562 |
|
|
311 |
|
|
19,317 |
|
|
353 |
State and municipal |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
10 |
Foreign government |
|
|
29,385 |
|
|
288 |
|
|
6,888 |
|
|
439 |
|
|
36,273 |
|
|
727 |
U.S. corporate |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
228 |
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
237 |
Other debt securities |
|
|
4,389 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
63 |
Total fixed income securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
78,054 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
$ |
18,634 |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
$ |
96,688 |
|
$ |
1,682 |
Equity securities |
|
$ |
830 |
|
$ |
257 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
857 |
|
$ |
259 |
2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities available-for-sale (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, principally obligations of U.S. federal agencies |
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
$ |
8,679 |
|
$ |
262 |
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
20,697 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
4,356 |
|
|
361 |
|
|
25,053 |
|
|
432 |
State and municipal |
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
21 |
Foreign government |
|
|
20,124 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
202 |
|
|
32,198 |
|
|
388 |
U.S. corporate |
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
903 |
|
|
275 |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
307 |
Other debt securities |
|
|
3,276 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
45 |
Total fixed income securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
55,086 |
|
$ |
405 |
|
$ |
20,063 |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
$ |
75,149 |
|
$ |
1,455 |
Equity securities |
|
$ |
229 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
263 |
|
$ |
21 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to current periods presentation. |
The following table presents the
amortized cost, fair value, and average yield on amortized cost of fixed income securities by contractual maturity dates as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
8,991 |
|
$ |
8,931 |
|
4.30 |
% |
After 1 but within 5 years |
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
9,685 |
|
4.42 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years |
|
|
5,291 |
|
|
5,218 |
|
5.44 |
|
After 10 years (2) |
|
|
71,772 |
|
|
71,692 |
|
5.98 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
95,949 |
|
$ |
95,526 |
|
5.63 |
% |
State and municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
77 |
|
6.10 |
% |
After 1 but within 5 years |
|
|
161 |
|
|
169 |
|
5.59 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years |
|
|
958 |
|
|
996 |
|
6.26 |
|
After 10 years (2) |
|
|
13,951 |
|
|
14,412 |
|
4.80 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,152 |
|
$ |
15,654 |
|
4.91 |
% |
All other (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
34,800 |
|
$ |
36,070 |
|
4.86 |
% |
After 1 but within 5 years |
|
|
50,478 |
|
|
49,858 |
|
5.82 |
|
After 5 but within 10 years |
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
12,955 |
|
5.68 |
|
After 10 years (2) |
|
|
44,181 |
|
|
44,044 |
|
5.21 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
142,692 |
|
$ |
142,927 |
|
5.38 |
% |
Total fixed income securities |
|
$ |
253,793 |
|
$ |
254,107 |
|
5.45 |
% |
(1) |
Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. federal agencies. |
(2) |
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights. |
(3) |
Includes foreign government, U.S. corporate, asset-backed securities issued by U.S. corporations, and other debt securities. Yields reflect the impact of local interest rates prevailing in
countries outside the U.S. |
The following table presents interest and dividends on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 (1) |
|
2004 (1) |
Taxable interest |
|
$ |
9,155 |
|
$ |
6,546 |
|
$ |
5,710 |
Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax |
|
|
660 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
412 |
Dividends |
|
|
584 |
|
|
292 |
|
|
81 |
Total interest and dividends |
|
$ |
10,399 |
|
$ |
7,338 |
|
$ |
6,203 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform with the current periods presentation. |
The following table represents realized gains and losses from sales of investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Gross realized investment gains |
|
$ |
2,119 |
|
|
$ |
2,275 |
|
|
$ |
1,456 |
|
Gross realized investment losses |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(623 |
) |
Net realized gains |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
$ |
1,962 |
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
135
16. LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and real estate |
|
$ |
225,944 |
|
|
$ |
192,108 |
|
Installment, revolving credit, and other |
|
|
131,399 |
|
|
|
127,789 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
$ |
362,086 |
|
|
$ |
324,992 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and real estate (2) |
|
$ |
44,457 |
|
|
$ |
39,619 |
|
Installment, revolving credit, and other (2) |
|
|
105,393 |
|
|
|
89,559 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
$ |
150,810 |
|
|
$ |
130,044 |
|
|
|
$ |
512,896 |
|
|
$ |
455,036 |
|
Net unearned income (2) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
Consumer loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
512,921 |
|
|
$ |
454,620 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
$ |
27,437 |
|
|
$ |
22,081 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
Mortgage and real estate (1) |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
$ |
29,706 |
|
|
$ |
24,062 |
|
In offices outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
$ |
105,872 |
|
|
$ |
80,116 |
|
Mortgage and real estate (1) |
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
5,206 |
|
Loans to financial institutions |
|
|
21,827 |
|
|
|
16,889 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
Governments and official institutions |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
$ |
136,914 |
|
|
$ |
105,175 |
|
|
|
$ |
166,620 |
|
|
$ |
129,237 |
|
Net unearned income |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
Corporate loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
166,271 |
|
|
$ |
128,883 |
|
(1) |
|
Loans secured primarily by real estate. |
(2) |
|
Reclassified to conform to current years presentation. |
(3) |
|
Includes loans not otherwise separately categorized. |
Included in
the previous loan table are lending products whose terms may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g., home equity loans), or
interest-only loans are examples of such products. However, these products are not material to Citigroups financial position and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate their additional inherent risk.
Impaired loans are those on which Citigroup
believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. This excludes smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are evaluated collectively for impairment, and are carried on a cash basis.
Valuation allowances for these loans are estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans contractual effective rate, the secondary market value
of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs.
The following table presents information about impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Impaired corporate loans |
|
$ |
458 |
|
$ |
925 |
|
$ |
1,854 |
Other impaired loans (1) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
327 |
|
|
934 |
Total impaired loans (2) |
|
$ |
818 |
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
$ |
2,788 |
Impaired loans with valuation allowances |
|
$ |
439 |
|
$ |
919 |
|
$ |
1,847 |
Total valuation allowances (3) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
238 |
|
|
431 |
During the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans |
|
$ |
767 |
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
$ |
2,215 |
Interest income recognized on impaired loans |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
99 |
|
$ |
175 |
(1) |
Primarily commercial market loans managed by the Consumer business. |
(2) |
Excludes loans purchased for investment purposes. |
(3) |
Included in the allowance for loan losses. |
In addition, included in
the loan table are purchased distressed loans, which are loans that have evidenced credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by Citigroup. In conforming to the requirements of Statement of Position No. 03-3,
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3), which became effective in 2005, these purchased loans were reclassified from other assets to loans.
In accordance with SOP 03-3, the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments must be recognized
in income over the life of the loans using a level yield. Accordingly, these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above. In addition, per the Statement of Position, subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for
a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield. However, increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income
prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loans level yield. Where the expected cash flow cannot be estimated, the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method.
The carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at December 31, 2006 was $949 million net of an allowance of $59 million.
136
The changes in the accretable yield, related
allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
Carrying amount of loan receivable |
|
|
Allowance |
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
1,094 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
Purchases (1) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
Disposals/payments received |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
Builds (reductions) to the allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
25 |
Increase to expected cash flow |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 (2) |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
949 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
(1) |
The balance reported in the column Carrying amount of loan receivable consists of $160 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $243 million under the
cost recovery method. These balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date. The related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans was $208 million at their acquisition date. The balance reported in the
Accretable yield column includes the effects from an increase in the expected cash flows of $72 million. |
(2) |
The balance reported in the column Carrying amount of loan receivable consists of $557 million of loans accounted under the level-yield method and $392 million accounted for under
the cost recovery method. |
17. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of year |
|
$ |
9,782 |
|
|
$ |
11,269 |
|
|
$ |
12,643 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
|
8,224 |
|
|
|
7,205 |
|
Corporate provision for credit losses |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(972 |
) |
Total provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
6,738 |
|
|
$ |
7,929 |
|
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer credit losses |
|
$ |
9,227 |
|
|
$ |
10,586 |
|
|
$ |
10,241 |
|
Consumer credit recoveries |
|
|
(1,965 |
) |
|
|
(1,903 |
) |
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
Net consumer loan losses |
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
|
$ |
8,683 |
|
|
$ |
8,471 |
|
Corporate credit losses |
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
632 |
|
Corporate credit recoveries (1) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
Net corporate credit losses (recoveries) |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
$ |
130 |
|
Other, net (2) |
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
|
$ |
994 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of year |
|
$ |
8,940 |
|
|
$ |
9,782 |
|
|
$ |
11,269 |
|
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at beginning of year (3) |
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
Provision for unfunded lending commitments |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at end of
year (3) |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
10,040 |
|
|
$ |
10,632 |
|
|
$ |
11,869 |
|
(1) |
Collections from credit default swaps are included in Principal Transactions on the Consolidated Statement of Income. |
(2) |
2006 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $429 million related to securitizations and portfolio sales and the addition of $84 million related to the acquisition of the
Credicard portfolio. 2005 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $584 million related to securitizations and portfolio sales, a reduction of $110 million related to purchase accounting adjustments from the KorAm acquisition, and a
reduction of $90 million from the sale of CitiCapitals transportation portfolio. 2004 primarily includes the addition of $715 million of loan loss reserves related to the acquisition of KorAm Bank and the addition of $148 million of loan loss
reserves related to the acquisition of WMF. |
(3) |
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded within Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
137
18. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The changes in goodwill during 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Goodwill |
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
31,992 |
|
Legg Mason acquisition |
|
|
716 |
|
FAB acquisition |
|
|
612 |
|
ABN AMRO Custody acquisition |
|
|
62 |
|
UNISEN acquisition |
|
|
57 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustmentsKorAm acquisition |
|
|
(110 |
) |
Disposition of Life Insurance and Annuities |
|
|
(291 |
) |
Disposition of CitiCapital Transportation Finance |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Foreign exchange translation and other |
|
|
211 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
33,130 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustmentLegg Mason acquisition |
|
$ |
24 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustmentFAB acquisition |
|
|
19 |
|
Consolidation of Credicard business |
|
|
223 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustmentUNISEN acquisition |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Sale of New York branches |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Foreign exchange translation and other |
|
|
50 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
33,415 |
|
The changes in goodwill by segment during 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Global Consumer |
|
|
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
Corporate/ Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 (1) |
|
$ |
25,299 |
|
|
$ |
5,817 |
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
31,992 |
|
Goodwill acquired during 2005 |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
Goodwill disposed during 2005 |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
Other (1) (2) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 (1) |
|
$ |
26,064 |
|
|
$ |
5,937 |
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,130 |
|
Goodwill acquired during 2006 |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
Goodwill disposed during 2006 |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
Other (2) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
224 |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
26,130 |
|
|
$ |
6,165 |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,415 |
|
(1) |
|
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
(2) |
|
Other changes in goodwill primarily reflects foreign exchange effects on non-dollar-denominated goodwill, as well as purchase accounting adjustments. |
During 2006 and 2005 no goodwill was written off due to impairment.
Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
In millions of dollars |
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
Accumulated amortization (1) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
Accumulated amortization (1) |
|
Net carrying amount |
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
8,391 |
|
$ |
3,512 |
|
$ |
4,879 |
|
$ |
7,541 |
|
$ |
2,929 |
|
$ |
4,612 |
Mortgage servicing rights (1) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
8,808 |
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
4,339 |
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
489 |
|
|
734 |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
424 |
|
|
824 |
Other customer relationships |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
389 |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
596 |
|
|
469 |
Present value of future profits |
|
|
428 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
181 |
|
|
429 |
|
|
229 |
|
|
200 |
Other (2) |
|
|
4,445 |
|
|
805 |
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
647 |
|
|
3,808 |
Total amortizing intangible assets |
|
$ |
15,531 |
|
$ |
5,708 |
|
$ |
9,823 |
|
$ |
23,546 |
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
$ |
14,252 |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497 |
Intangible assets carried at fair value |
|
$ |
5,439 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,439 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
20,970 |
|
$ |
5,708 |
|
$ |
15,901 |
|
$ |
23,546 |
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
$ |
14,749 |
(1) |
|
In connection with the adoption of SFAS 156 on January 1, 2006, the Company elected to subsequently account for MSRs at fair value with the related changes reported in earnings during
the respective period. Accordingly, the Company no longer amortizes servicing assets over the period of estimated net servicing income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 156, accumulated amortization of mortgage servicing rights included the related
valuation allowance. |
(2) |
|
Includes contract-related intangible assets. |
N/A Not
Applicable.
138
The intangible assets recorded during 2006
and their respective amortization periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
Weighted-average amortization period in years |
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
756 |
|
9 |
Other intangibles |
|
|
99 |
|
7 |
Indefinite-lived intangibles |
|
|
141 |
|
N/A |
Total intangible assets recorded during the period (1) |
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
(1) |
There was no significant residual value estimated for the intangible assets recorded during 2006. |
Intangible assets amortization expense was $1,024 million, $1,842 million and $1,482 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Intangible assets amortization expense is estimated to be $1,006 million in 2007,
$980 million in 2008, $935 million in 2009, $896 million in 2010, and $634 million in 2011.
The changes in intangible assets during 2005 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Intangible assets (net carrying amount) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
Federated receivables acquisitionpurchased credit card relationships |
|
|
535 |
|
Legg Mason acquisitioncustomer relationship intangibles |
|
|
380 |
|
FAB acquisitioncore deposit intangibles |
|
|
56 |
|
Servicing rights on Student Loan securitizations |
|
|
78 |
|
UNISEN acquisitioncustomer relationship intangibles |
|
|
38 |
|
Changes in capitalized MSRs (1) |
|
|
1,049 |
|
Disposition of Life Insurance and Annuities |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Disposition of Asset Management |
|
|
(778 |
) |
Foreign exchange translation and other |
|
|
48 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
(1,842 |
) |
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
14,749 |
|
Federated receivables acquisitionpurchased credit card relationships |
|
|
473 |
|
Consolidation of CrediCard businesspurchased credit card relationships |
|
|
93 |
|
Consolidation of Brandco, owner of CrediCard brand nameindefinite-lived intangibles |
|
|
130 |
|
Servicing rights on Student Loan securitization |
|
|
99 |
|
Acquisition of U.K. Shell Credit Card portfoliopurchased credit card relationships |
|
|
22 |
|
Acquisition of Exxon Mobil portfoliopurchased credit card relationships |
|
|
168 |
|
Foreign exchange translation and other |
|
|
91 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
Changes in capitalized MSRs (1) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
15,901 |
|
(1) |
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 143 for a summarization of the changes in capitalized MSRs. |
19. DEBT
Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings consist of commercial paper and other borrowings with weighted average interest rates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
Balance |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Balance |
|
Weighted Average |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Funding Inc. |
|
$ |
41,767 |
|
5.31 |
% |
|
$ |
32,581 |
|
4.34 |
% |
Other Citigroup Subsidiaries |
|
|
1,928 |
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
1,578 |
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
$ |
43,695 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,159 |
|
|
|
Other borrowings |
|
$ |
57,138 |
|
4.47 |
% |
|
$ |
32,771 |
|
3.85 |
% |
Total |
|
$ |
100,833 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,930 |
|
|
|
Borrowings under bank lines of credit may be at interest rates based on LIBOR, CD rates, the prime rate, or bids submitted by the banks. Citigroup pays
commitment fees for its lines of credit.
Some of Citigroups nonbank subsidiaries have credit facilities with Citigroups
subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.
139
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average coupon |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
Balances |
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Citigroup Parent Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes (1) |
|
4.98 |
% |
|
2007-2035 |
|
$ |
91,491 |
|
$ |
74,429 |
Subordinated notes |
|
5.56 |
|
|
2007-2036 |
|
|
24,084 |
|
|
19,712 |
Junior subordinated notes relating to trust preferred securities |
|
6.78 |
|
|
2027-2066 |
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
6,459 |
Other Citigroup Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes (2) |
|
5.36 |
|
|
2007-2037 |
|
|
111,309 |
|
|
68,563 |
Subordinated notes |
|
4.80 |
|
|
2007-2023 |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
2,576 |
Secured debt |
|
7.57 |
|
|
2007-2044 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
583 |
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
2.74 |
|
|
2007-2097 |
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
38,884 |
Subordinated notes |
|
4.81 |
|
|
2010-2037 |
|
|
117 |
|
|
330 |
Citigroup Funding Inc. (4) (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
4.69 |
|
|
2007-2051 |
|
|
18,847 |
|
|
5,963 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
288,494 |
|
$ |
217,499 |
Senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,249 |
|
$ |
187,839 |
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,044 |
|
|
22,618 |
Junior subordinated notes relating to trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
6,459 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
583 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
288,494 |
|
$ |
217,499 |
(1) |
Includes $250 million of notes maturing in 2098. |
(2) |
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are $81.5 billion and $40.9 billion, respectively. |
(3) |
Includes Targeted Growth Enhanced Term Securities (TARGETS) with carrying values of $243 million issued by TARGETS Trusts XX through XXIV and $376 million issued by TARGETS Trusts XVIII
through XXIV at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively (collectively, the CGMHI Trusts). CGMHI owns all of the voting securities of the CGMHI Trusts. The CGMHI Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than
those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the TARGETS and the CGMHI Trusts common securities. The CGMHI Trusts obligations under the TARGETS are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CGMHI and CGMHIs
guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup. |
(4) |
Includes Targeted Growth Enhanced Term Securities (CFI TARGETS) with carrying values of $56 million and $58 million issued by TARGETS Trusts XXV and XXVI at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively (the CFI Trusts). CFI owns all of the voting securities of the CFI Trusts. The CFI Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the CFI
TARGETS and the CFI Trusts common securities. The CFI Trusts obligations under the CFI TARGETS are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI and CFIs guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.
|
(5) |
Includes Principal-Protected Trust Securities (Safety First Trust Securities) with a carrying value of $78 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1 (the 2006-1
Trust) on November 29, 2006. CFI owns all of the voting securities of the 2006-1 Trust. The 2006-1 Trust has no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the Safety
First Trust Securities and the 2006-1 Trusts common securities. The 2006-1 Trusts obligations under the Safety First Trust Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI and CFIs guarantee obligations are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup. |
CGMHI has a syndicated five-year committed uncollateralized revolving line of credit facility with unaffiliated banks totaling $3.0 billion, which matures in 2011. CGMHI also has three-year bilateral facilities
totaling $575 million with unaffiliated banks with borrowings maturing on various dates in 2009. At December 31, 2006, $1.0 billion of the syndicated five-year committed facility was drawn.
CGMHI also has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks. At December 31, 2006, CGMHI had drawn down the full $1.78 billion
available under these facilities, of which $1.08 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. A bank can terminate these facilities by giving CGMHI prior notice (generally one year). CGMHI also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities
that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHIs short-term requirements.
The Company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies. It uses derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swaps, to effectively
convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged. In addition, the Company
uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances. At December 31, 2006, the Companys overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 5.00% on a contractual basis and 4.79%
including the effects of derivative contracts.
Aggregate
annual maturities of long-term debt obligations (based on final maturity dates) including trust preferred securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Thereafter |
Citigroup Parent Company |
|
$ |
9,828 |
|
$ |
12,344 |
|
$ |
13,422 |
|
$ |
12,246 |
|
$ |
13,344 |
|
$ |
64,166 |
Other Citigroup Subsidiaries |
|
|
22,015 |
|
|
26,067 |
|
|
34,012 |
|
|
6,037 |
|
|
15,050 |
|
|
12,397 |
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. |
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
4,633 |
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
8,169 |
Citigroup Funding Inc. |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
6,168 |
|
|
4,207 |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
3,638 |
Total |
|
$ |
38,519 |
|
$ |
49,212 |
|
$ |
56,168 |
|
$ |
24,563 |
|
$ |
31,662 |
|
$ |
88,370 |
140
Long-term debt at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 includes $9,775 million and $6,459 million, respectively, of junior subordinated debt.
The Company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of Delaware, which exist for the exclusive purposes of (i) issuing Trust Securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust;
(ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of its parent; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. Upon
approval from the Federal Reserve, Citigroup has the right to redeem these securities.
Citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or
repurchase (i) the 6.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XV before September 15, 2056 and (ii) the 6.45% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVI before December 31, 2046 unless certain
conditions,
described in Exhibit 4.03 to Citigroups Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2006 and in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroups Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006, respectively, are met. These agreements are for the benefit of the holders of Citigroups 6.00% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2034.
For Regulatory Capital purposes, these Trust Securities remain a component of Tier 1 Capital. See Capital Resources and Liquidity on
page 86.
Citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts. These subsidiary trusts have no assets, operations,
revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts common securities. These subsidiary trusts obligations are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by Citigroup.
The following table summarizes the financial structure of each of the Companys subsidiary trusts at
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust |
Trust Securities with
distributions guaranteed by Citigroup: |
|
Issuance date |
|
Securities issued |
|
Liquidation value |
|
Coupon rate |
|
Common shares issued to
parent |
|
Amount (1) |
|
Maturity |
|
Redeemable by issuer beginning |
In millions of dollars, except share amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citicorp Capital I (2) |
|
Dec. 1996 |
|
300,000 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
7.933% |
|
9,000 |
|
$ |
309 |
|
Feb. 15, 2027 |
|
Feb. 15, 2007 |
Citicorp Capital II (2) |
|
Jan. 1997 |
|
450,000 |
|
|
450 |
|
8.015% |
|
13,500 |
|
|
464 |
|
Feb. 15, 2027 |
|
Feb. 15, 2007 |
Citigroup Capital II |
|
Dec. 1996 |
|
400,000 |
|
|
400 |
|
7.750% |
|
12,372 |
|
|
412 |
|
Dec. 1, 2036 |
|
Dec. 1, 2006 |
Citigroup Capital III |
|
Dec. 1996 |
|
200,000 |
|
|
200 |
|
7.625% |
|
6,186 |
|
|
206 |
|
Dec. 1, 2036 |
|
Not redeemable |
Citigroup Capital VII |
|
July 2001 |
|
46,000,000 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
7.125% |
|
1,422,681 |
|
|
1,186 |
|
July 31, 2031 |
|
July 31, 2006 |
Citigroup Capital VIII |
|
Sept. 2001 |
|
56,000,000 |
|
|
1,400 |
|
6.950% |
|
1,731,959 |
|
|
1,443 |
|
Sept. 15, 2031 |
|
Sept. 17, 2006 |
Citigroup Capital IX |
|
Feb. 2003 |
|
44,000,000 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
6.000% |
|
1,360,825 |
|
|
1,134 |
|
Feb. 14, 2033 |
|
Feb. 13, 2008 |
Citigroup Capital X |
|
Sept. 2003 |
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
500 |
|
6.100% |
|
618,557 |
|
|
515 |
|
Sept. 30, 2033 |
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
Citigroup Capital XI |
|
Sept. 2004 |
|
24,000,000 |
|
|
600 |
|
6.000% |
|
742,269 |
|
|
619 |
|
Sept. 27, 2034 |
|
Sept. 27, 2009 |
Citigroup Capital XIV |
|
June 2006 |
|
22,600,000 |
|
|
565 |
|
6.875% |
|
40,000 |
|
|
566 |
|
June 30, 2066 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
Citigroup Capital XV |
|
Sept. 2006 |
|
47,400,000 |
|
|
1,185 |
|
6.500% |
|
40,000 |
|
|
1,186 |
|
Sept. 15, 2066 |
|
Sept. 15, 2011 |
Citigroup Capital XVI |
|
Nov. 2006 |
|
64,000,000 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
6.450% |
|
20,000 |
|
|
1,601 |
|
Dec. 31, 2066 |
|
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Adam Statutory Trust I (3) |
|
Dec. 2001 |
|
23,000 |
|
|
23 |
|
3 mo. LIB +360 bp. |
|
712 |
|
|
24 |
|
Dec. 18, 2031 |
|
Dec. 18, 2006 |
Adam Capital Trust II (3) |
|
Apr. 2002 |
|
22,000 |
|
|
22 |
|
6 mo. LIB +370 bp. |
|
681 |
|
|
23 |
|
Apr. 22, 2032 |
|
Apr. 22, 2007 |
Adam Statutory Trust II (3) |
|
Mar. 2002 |
|
25,000 |
|
|
25 |
|
3 mo. LIB +360 bp. |
|
774 |
|
|
26 |
|
Mar. 26, 2032 |
|
Mar. 26, 2007 |
Adam Capital Trust III (3) |
|
Dec. 2002 |
|
17,500 |
|
|
18 |
|
3 mo. LIB +335 bp. |
|
542 |
|
|
18 |
|
Jan. 07, 2033 |
|
Jan. 7, 2008 |
Adam Statutory Trust III (3) |
|
Dec. 2002 |
|
25,000 |
|
|
25 |
|
3 mo. LIB +325 bp. |
|
774 |
|
|
26 |
|
Dec. 26, 2032 |
|
Dec. 26, 2007 |
Adam Statutory Trust IV (3) |
|
Sept. 2003 |
|
40,000 |
|
|
40 |
|
3 mo. LIB +295 bp. |
|
1,238 |
|
|
41 |
|
Sept. 17, 2033 |
|
Sept. 17, 2008 |
Adam Statutory Trust V (3) |
|
Mar. 2004 |
|
35,000 |
|
|
35 |
|
3 mo. LIB +279 bp. |
|
1,083 |
|
|
36 |
|
Mar. 17, 2034 |
|
Mar. 17, 2009 |
Total obligated |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,835 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the proceeds received from the Trust at the date of issuance. |
(2) |
Assumed by Citigroup via Citicorps merger with and into Citigroup on August 1, 2005. |
(3) |
Assumed by Citigroup upon completion of First American Bank acquisition which closed on March 31, 2005. |
In each case, the coupon rate on the debentures is the same as that on the trust securities. Distributions on the trust securities and interest on
the debentures are payable quarterly, except for Citigroup Capital II and III and Citicorp Capital I and II, on which distributions are payable semiannually.
During 2006, Citigroup issued $1.600 billion, $1.185 billion, and $565 million related to the Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVI, XV, and XIV, respectively. On December 8, 2006,
Citigroup redeemed for cash all of the $25 million Trust Preferred Securities of Adam
Capital Trust I, at the redemption price of $1,000 per preferred security plus any accrued distribution up to but excluding the date of redemption.
On February 15, 2007, Citigroup redeemed for cash all of the $300 million Trust Preferred Securities of Citicorp Capital I, $450
million of Citicorp Capital II, and $400 million of Citigroup Capital II, at the redemption price of $1,000 per preferred security plus any accrued distribution up to but excluding the date of redemption.
141
20. PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Perpetual Preferred Stock
The following table sets forth the Companys perpetual preferred stock outstanding at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value (in millions of dollars) |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Redeemable in whole or in part on or after (1) |
|
Redemption price per share (2) |
|
Number of shares |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Series F (3) |
|
6.365 |
% |
|
June 16, 2007 |
|
$ |
250 |
|
1,600,000 |
|
$ |
400 |
|
$ |
400 |
Series G (3) |
|
6.213 |
% |
|
July 11, 2007 |
|
$ |
250 |
|
800,000 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
200 |
Series H (3) |
|
6.231 |
% |
|
September 8, 2007 |
|
$ |
250 |
|
800,000 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
200 |
Series M (3) |
|
5.864 |
% |
|
October 8, 2007 |
|
$ |
250 |
|
800,000 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
200 |
Series V (4) |
|
Fixed/Adjustable |
|
|
February 15, 2006 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
1,125 |
(1) |
Under various circumstances, the Company may redeem certain series of preferred stock at times other than described above. |
(2) |
Liquidation preference per share equals redemption price per share. |
(3) |
Issued as depositary shares, each representing a one-fifth interest in a share of the corresponding series of preferred stock. |
(4) |
Issued as depositary shares, each representing a one-tenth interest in a share of the corresponding series of preferred stock. |
All dividends on the Companys perpetual preferred stock are payable quarterly and are cumulative.
On February 15, 2006, Citigroup redeemed for cash all outstanding shares of its Fixed/Adjustable Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series V. The
redemption price was $50.00 per depositary share, plus accrued dividends to the date of redemption. At the date of redemption, the value of the Series V Preferred Stock was $125 million.
Regulatory Capital
Citigroup is subject to risk-based capital and leverage guidelines issued by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (FRB). Its U.S. insured
depository institution subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., are subject to similar guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory
agencies. These guidelines are used to evaluate capital adequacy and include the required minimums shown in the following table.
The
regulatory agencies are required by law to take specific prompt actions with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital standards. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, all of Citigroups U.S. insured subsidiary depository
institutions were well capitalized.
At December 31, 2006, regulatory capital as set forth in guidelines issued by
the U.S. federal bank regulators is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Required minimum |
|
|
Well capitalized minimum |
|
|
Citigroup (1) |
|
|
Citibank, N.A. (1) |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90,899 |
|
|
$ |
59,860 |
|
Total Capital (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,260 |
|
|
|
89,138 |
|
Tier 1 Capital Ratio |
|
4.0 |
% |
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
8.59 |
% |
|
|
8.32 |
% |
Total Capital Ratio (2) |
|
8.0 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
11.65 |
|
|
|
12.39 |
|
Leverage Ratio (3) |
|
3.0 |
|
|
5.0 |
(4) |
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
(1) |
The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006. |
(2) |
Total Capital includes Tier 1 and Tier 2. |
(3) |
Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted average assets. |
(4) |
Applicable only to depository institutions. For bank holding companies to be well capitalized, they must maintain a minimum Leverage Ratio of 3%. |
Banking Subsidiaries
There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions
to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its nonbank subsidiaries. The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of
federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agencys regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by
applicable state law.
As
of December 31, 2006, Citigroups subsidiary depository institutions can declare dividends to their parent companies, without regulatory approval, of approximately $17.7 billion. In determining the dividends, each depository institution
must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and Leverage Ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current
operating earnings. Consistent with these considerations, Citigroup estimates that, as of December 31, 2006, its subsidiary depository institutions can distribute dividends to Citigroup of approximately $11.0 billion of the available $17.7
billion.
142
Non-Banking Subsidiaries
Citigroup also receives dividends from
its nonbank subsidiaries. These nonbank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends.
The ability of
CGMHI to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Jurisdiction |
|
Net capital or equivalent |
|
Excess over minimum requirement |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule
15c3-1) |
|
$ |
7,995 |
|
$ |
7,293 |
Citigroup Global Markets Limited |
|
United Kingdoms Financial Services Authority |
|
$ |
9,448 |
|
$ |
2,695 |
21. CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Changes in each component of Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Net unrealized gains on investment securities |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
Pension liability adjustments |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
Balance, January 1, 2004 |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
(4,465 |
) |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( 806 |
) |
Increase in net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
Change |
|
$ |
(275 |
) |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
|
$ |
(3,110 |
) |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
Decrease in net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes (2) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes (2) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Change |
|
$ |
(1,549 |
) |
|
$ |
(980 |
) |
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,228 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
(4,090 |
) |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,532 |
) |
Increase in net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes (5) |
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes (5) |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647 |
) |
|
|
(1,647 |
) |
Current period change |
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
$ |
1,294 |
|
|
$ |
(673 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,648 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,168 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
$ |
(2,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,786 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,700 |
) |
(1) |
Reflects, among other items, the movements in the Japanese yen, euro, Korean won, Mexican peso, British pound, and the Polish zloty against the U.S. dollar and changes in related tax effects.
|
(2) |
Primarily due to realized gains, including $1.5 billion after-tax, resulting from the sale of the Life Insurance and Annuities business. |
(3) |
Reflects, among other items, the movements in the Japanese yen, British pound, Bahamian dollar, and the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.
|
(4) |
Additional minimum liability, as required by SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87), related to unfunded or book reserve plans, such as the U.S.
nonqualified pension plans and certain foreign pension plans. |
(5) |
Primarily related to activities in the Companys Mortgage-Backed Securities Program. |
(6) |
Reflects, among other items, the movements in the British pound, euro, Korean won, the Polish zloty, and the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.
|
22. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The Company primarily securitizes credit card receivables and mortgages.
Other types of assets securitized include corporate debt securities, auto loans, and student loans.
After securitization of credit card
receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. The Company also arranges for third parties to provide credit enhancement to the trusts,
including cash collateral accounts, subordinated securities, and letters of credit. As specified in some of
the sale agreements, the net revenue collected each month is accumulated up to a predetermined maximum amount, and is available over the remaining term of
that transaction to make payments of yield, fees, and transaction costs in the event that net cash flows from the receivables are not sufficient. Once the predetermined amount is reached, net revenue is recognized by the Citigroup subsidiary that
sold the receivables.
The Company provides a wide range of mortgage and other loan products to a diverse customer base. In connection with
the securitization of these loans, the servicing rights entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the
143
contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the
loss of future servicing fees. In non-recourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Company is the cost of temporary advances of funds. In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans such
as FNMA or FHLMC or with a private investor, insurer, or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing occur primarily when foreclosure sale proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage are less than the outstanding principal balance and
accrued interest of the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The
Companys mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchase of
the securities issued by the trust.
The Company also originates and sells first mortgage loans in the ordinary course of its mortgage
banking activities. The Company sells some of these loans to the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) with the servicing rights retained. GNMA has the primary recourse obligation on the individual loans; however, GNMAs recourse
obligation is capped at a fixed amount per loan. Any losses above that fixed amount are borne by Citigroup as the seller/servicer.
The following table summarizes certain cash flows received from and paid to securitization trusts during 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
In billions of dollars |
|
Credit cards |
|
Mortgages |
|
Other (1) |
|
Credit cards |
|
Mortgages |
|
Other (1) |
|
Credit cards |
|
Mortgages |
|
Other (1) |
Proceeds from new securitizations |
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
$ |
96.7 |
|
$ |
38.7 |
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
$ |
85.2 |
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
$ |
66.4 |
|
$ |
22.7 |
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables |
|
|
213.1 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
171.1 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.1 |
Contractual servicing fees received |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
(1) |
Other includes corporate debt securities, student loans and other assets. |
The Company recognized gains on
securitizations of mortgages of $171 million, $197 million, and $342 million for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. In 2006, the Company recorded net gains of $975 million and, in 2005 and 2004, recorded net gains of $1.0 billion and $234 million,
respectively, related to the securitization of credit card receivables. Gains recognized on the securitization of other assets during 2006, 2005 and 2004
were $217 million, $126 million and $93 million, respectively.
Key assumptions used for credit cards, mortgages, and
other assets during 2006 and 2005 in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
Mortgages and other (1) |
|
Credit cards |
|
Mortgages and other (1) |
|
Discount rate |
|
12.0% to 16.2% |
|
0.4% to 27.9% |
|
13.6% to 17.3% |
|
0.4% to 98.6 |
% |
Constant prepayment rate |
|
6.4% to 21.7% |
|
6.6% to 52.5% |
|
8.5% to 20.0% |
|
6.0% to 46.4 |
% |
Anticipated net credit losses |
|
3.8% to 6.1% |
|
0.0% to 100% |
|
5.1% to 6.5% |
|
0.0% to 80.0 |
% |
(1) |
Other includes corporate debt securities, student loans and other assets. |
As required by SFAS 140, the
effect of two negative changes in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests must be disclosed. The negative effect of each change must be calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant.
Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.
At December 31, 2006, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in
each of the key assumptions were as follows:
Key Assumptions at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages and other (1) |
|
|
Credit cards |
|
Discount rate |
|
4.1% to 27.9 |
% |
|
12.8% to 16.2 |
% |
Constant prepayment rate |
|
7.1% to 52.5 |
% |
|
6.4% to 20.9 |
% |
Anticipated net credit losses |
|
24.0% to 100 |
% |
|
3.9% to 6.1 |
% |
Weighted average life |
|
6.1 to 21.2 years |
|
|
11 to 12 months |
|
(1) |
Other includes corporate debt securities, student loans and other assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Credit cards |
|
|
Mortgages and other |
|
Carrying value of retained interests |
|
$ |
9,081 |
|
|
$ |
16,789 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
20% |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
Constant prepayment rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
|
$ |
(329 |
) |
20% |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(631 |
) |
Anticipated net credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
$ |
(414 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
20% |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
144
Managed Loans
After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company
continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.
The following tables present a reconciliation between the managed basis and on-balance sheet credit card portfolios and the related
delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars, except loans in billions |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Principal amounts, at year end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet |
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
$ |
69.5 |
Securitized amounts |
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
96.2 |
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed |
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
$ |
165.7 |
Delinquencies, at year end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On balance sheet |
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
$ |
1,630 |
Securitized amounts |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
1,314 |
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed |
|
$ |
3,043 |
|
$ |
2,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the year ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
On-balance sheet |
|
$ |
3,088 |
|
$ |
3,404 |
|
$ |
4,140 |
Securitized amounts |
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
4,865 |
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
5 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
214 |
Total managed |
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
$ |
8,758 |
|
$ |
9,219 |
Mortgage Servicing Rights
The fair value of capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights (MSRs) was $5.4 billion and $4.3 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
4,339 |
|
|
$ |
4,149 |
|
Originations |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Amortization (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
Gain (loss) on changes in value of MSRs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Provision for impairments (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes (3) |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
5,439 |
|
|
$ |
4,339 |
|
(1) |
The gain (loss) on changes in value of MSRs represents the change in the fair value of the MSRs attributable to risks that were hedged using fair value hedges in accordance with SFAS 133
prior to 2006. The offsetting change in the fair value of the related hedging instruments is not included in this table. With the adoption of SFAS 156 on January 1, 2006, the Company no longer applies fair value hedge accounting to its MSRs.
|
(2) |
With the adoption of SFAS 156, the Company carries its MSRs at fair value and no longer amortizes servicing assets over the period of estimated net servicing income, or assesses impairment
related to the excess of the MSRs net carrying value over their fair value as any impairment would be reflected in the fair value of the MSRs. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 156, the provision for impairment of MSRs represented the excess of
their net carrying value, which included the gain (loss) on changes in value of MSRs over their fair value. The provision for impairment increased the valuation allowance on MSRs, which was a component of the net MSRs carrying value. A
recovery of the MSR impairment was recorded when the fair value of the MSRs exceeded their carrying value, but it was limited to the amount of the existing valuation allowance. The valuation allowance on MSRs was $1.021 billion at December 31,
2005. |
(3) |
Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time. |
The market for MSRs is not sufficiently liquid
to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest rate
scenarios, and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The model assumptions and the MSRs fair value estimates
are compared to observable trades of similar MSR portfolios and interest-only security portfolios, as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. The cash flow model and underlying prepayment and interest rate models used to value these
MSRs are subject to validation in accordance with the Companys model validation policies.
Key economic assumptions used in
determining the fair value of MSRs at December 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
10.61% |
Estimated prepayment rate |
|
11.72% |
Average expected life in years |
|
6.13 years |
The fair value of the MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts
in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased
securities classified as trading. The amount of contractually specified servicing fees, late fees and ancillary fees earned were $1,036 million, $56 million and $45 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006. These fees are
classified in the Consolidated Statement of Income as Commissions and Fees.
145
Variable Interest Entities
The following table summarizes all the Companys involvement in SPEs by business segment at December 31, 2006 and 2005, both as direct participant or
structurer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 (1) |
In millions of dollars of SPE assets |
|
VIEs |
|
QSPEs |
|
Total involvement with SPEs |
|
VIEs |
|
QSPEs |
|
Total involvement with SPEs |
Global Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Cards |
|
$ |
527 |
|
$ |
111,766 |
|
$ |
112,293 |
|
$ |
791 |
|
$ |
107,925 |
|
$ |
108,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment funds |
|
|
12,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,358 |
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,920 |
Leasing |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,437 |
Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
333,804 |
|
|
333,804 |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
283,245 |
|
|
285,078 |
Other |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
12,732 |
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
5,716 |
|
|
7,449 |
Total |
|
$ |
17,550 |
|
$ |
458,302 |
|
$ |
475,852 |
|
$ |
17,714 |
|
$ |
396,886 |
|
$ |
414,600 |
Corporate and Investment Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper conduits |
|
$ |
70,825 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
70,825 |
|
$ |
59,662 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
59,662 |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
109,659 |
|
|
1,033,810 |
|
|
1,143,469 |
|
|
95,149 |
|
|
798,220 |
|
|
893,369 |
CDOs |
|
|
110,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
110,109 |
|
|
74,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
74,290 |
Structured finance |
|
|
146,419 |
|
|
11,249 |
|
|
157,668 |
|
|
141,398 |
|
|
6,117 |
|
|
147,515 |
Other |
|
|
56,437 |
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
58,788 |
|
|
54,853 |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
57,142 |
Total |
|
$ |
493,449 |
|
$ |
1,047,410 |
|
$ |
1,540,859 |
|
$ |
425,352 |
|
$ |
806,626 |
|
$ |
1,231,978 |
Global Wealth Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment funds |
|
$ |
4,400 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,400 |
|
$ |
4,820 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,820 |
Structured investment vehicles |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
Total |
|
$ |
5,659 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,659 |
|
$ |
5,440 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,440 |
Alternative Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured investment vehicles |
|
$ |
79,847 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
79,847 |
|
$ |
55,692 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
55,692 |
Investment funds |
|
|
42,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
42,187 |
|
|
20,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,727 |
Total |
|
$ |
122,034 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
122,034 |
|
$ |
76,419 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
76,419 |
Corporate/Other-Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Securities |
|
$ |
9,775 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
9,775 |
|
$ |
6,459 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,459 |
Total Citigroup |
|
$ |
648,467 |
|
$ |
1,505,712 |
|
$ |
2,154,179 |
|
$ |
531,384 |
|
$ |
1,203,512 |
|
$ |
1,734,896 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
Some of the Companys
private equity subsidiaries may invest in venture capital entities that may also be subject to FIN 46-R and are not included in the previous table showing our VIE involvement. The Company accounts for its venture capital activities in accordance
with the Investment Company Audit Guide (Audit Guide). Also excluded from the above table are certain funds for which the Company provides investment management services. The Companys involvement in these funds is not considered significant.
The Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services to numerous personal estate trusts, which are considered
VIEs under FIN 46-R, but not consolidated. These trusts are excluded from the table summarizing the Companys involvement in VIEs.
The following table represents the carrying
amounts and classification of consolidated assets that are collateral for VIE obligations, including VIEs that were consolidated prior to the implementation of FIN 46-R under then-existing guidance and VIEs that the Company became involved with
after July 1, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
Cash |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
Trading account assets |
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
29.7 |
Investments |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
6.1 |
Loans |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
9.5 |
Other assets |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
4.7 |
Total assets of consolidated VIEs |
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
$ |
50.4 |
146
The consolidated VIEs included in the table above represent hundreds of separate entities with which the Company is involved and includes approximately $1.6
billion related to VIEs consolidated as a result of adopting FIN 46-R as of January 1, 2004 and $2.1 billion related to VIEs consolidated as a result of adopting FIN 46 at July 1, 2003. Of the $54.7 billion and $50.4 billion of total
assets of VIEs consolidated by the Company at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, $39.2 billion and $37.1 billion represent structured transactions where the Company packages and securitizes assets purchased in the financial markets or
from clients in order to create new security offerings and financing opportunities for clients; $13.1 billion and $10.6 billion represent investment vehicles that were established to provide a return to the investors in the vehicles; and $2.4
billion and $2.7 billion represent vehicles that hold lease receivables and equipment as collateral to issue debt securities, thus obtaining secured financing at favorable interest rates.
The Company may provide various products and services to the VIEs. It may provide liquidity facilities, may be a party to derivative contracts with VIEs,
may provide loss enhancement in the form of letters of credit and other guarantees to the VIEs, may be the investment manager, and may also have an ownership interest or other investment in certain VIEs. In general, the investors in the obligations
of consolidated VIEs have recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to a derivative transaction involving the VIE.
In addition to the VIEs that are consolidated in accordance with FIN 46-R, the Company has significant variable interests in certain other
VIEs that are not consolidated because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. These include multi-seller finance companies, collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), structured finance transactions, and numerous investment funds. In addition to
these VIEs, the Company issues preferred securities to third-party investors through trust vehicles as a source of funding and regulatory capital, which were deconsolidated during the first quarter of 2004. The Companys liabilities to the
deconsolidated trusts are included in long-term debt.
The Company administers several third-party-owned, special purpose, multi-seller
finance companies that purchase pools of trade receivables, credit cards, and other financial assets from third-party clients of the Company. As administrator, the Company provides accounting, funding, and operations services to these conduits.
Generally, the Company has no ownership interest in the conduits. The sellers continue to service the transferred assets. The conduits asset purchases are funded by issuing commercial paper and medium-term notes. The sellers absorb the first
losses of the conduits by providing collateral in the form of excess assets. The Company, along with other financial institutions, provides liquidity facilities, such as commercial paper backstop lines of credit to the conduits. The Company also
provides loss enhancement in the form of letters of credit and other guarantees. All fees are charged on a market basis.
During 2003, to
comply with FIN 46-R, many of the conduits issued first loss subordinated notes such that one third-party investor in each conduit would be deemed the primary beneficiary and would consolidate the conduit. At December 31, 2006 and
2005, total assets in unconsolidated conduits were $66.3 billion and $55.3 billion, respectively.
The Company also packages and securitizes
assets purchased in the financial markets in order to create new security offerings, including arbitrage CDOs and synthetic CDOs for institutional clients and retail
customers, that match the clients investment needs and preferences. Typically, these instruments diversify investors risk to a pool of assets as
compared with investments in an individual asset. The VIEs, which are issuers of CDO securities, are generally organized as limited liability corporations. The Company typically receives fees for structuring and/or distributing the securities sold
to investors. In some cases, the Company may repackage the investment with higher rated debt CDO securities or U.S. Treasury securities to provide a greater or a very high degree of certainty of the return on invested principal. A third-party
manager is typically retained by the VIE to select collateral for inclusion in the pool and then actively manage it, or, in other cases, only to manage work-out credits. The Company may also provide other financial services and/or products to the
VIEs for market-rate fees. These may include: the provision of liquidity or contingent liquidity facilities; interest rate or foreign exchange hedges and credit derivative instruments; and the purchasing and warehousing of securities until they are
sold to the SPE. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs under FIN 46-R due to its limited continuing involvement and, as a result, does not consolidate their assets and liabilities in its financial statements.
In addition to the conduits discussed above, the following table represents the assets of unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant
involvement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005(1) |
CDO-type transactions |
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
$ |
40.7 |
Investment-related transactions |
|
|
122.1 |
|
|
78.0 |
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
6.5 |
Mortgage-related transactions |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
3.1 |
Structured finance and other |
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
63.1 |
Total assets of significant unconsolidated VIEs |
|
$ |
227.8 |
|
$ |
191.4 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in venture capital investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing
on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees investment commitments.
In addition, the Company administers
numerous personal estate trusts. The Company may act as trustee and may also be the investment manager for the trust assets.
As mentioned
above, the Company may, along with other financial institutions, provide liquidity facilities, such as commercial paper backstop lines of credit to the VIEs. The Company may be a party to derivative contracts with VIEs, may provide loss enhancement
in the form of letters of credit and other guarantees to the VIEs, may be the investment manager, and may also have an ownership interest in certain VIEs. Although actual losses are not expected to be material, the Companys maximum exposure to
loss as a result of its involvement with VIEs that are not consolidated was $109 billion and $91 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For this purpose, maximum exposure is considered to be the notional amounts of credit lines,
guarantees, other credit support, and liquidity facilities, the notional amounts of credit default swaps and certain total return swaps, and the amount invested where Citigroup has an ownership interest in the VIEs. In addition, the Company may be
party to other derivative contracts with VIEs. Exposures that are considered to be guarantees are also included in Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 151.
147
23. DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES
In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative
transactions. These derivative transactions include:
|
|
Futures and forward contracts which are commitments to buy or sell at a future date a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price and
may be settled in cash or through delivery. |
|
|
Swap contracts which are commitments to settle in cash at a future date or dates that may range from a few days to a number of years, based on differentials
between specified financial indices, as applied to a notional principal amount. |
|
|
Option contracts which give the purchaser, for a fee, the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell within a limited time a financial instrument or
currency at a contracted price that may also be settled in cash, based on differentials between specified indices. |
Citigroup enters into these derivative contracts for the following reasons:
|
|
Trading Purposes Customer Needs Citigroup offers its customers derivatives in connection with their risk-management actions to transfer, modify
or reduce their interest rate, foreign exchange and other market/credit risks or for their own trading purposes. As part of this process, Citigroup considers the customers suitability for the risk involved, and the business purpose for the
transaction. Citigroup also manages its derivative-risk positions through offsetting trade activities, controls focused on price verification, and daily reporting of positions to senior managers. |
|
|
Trading Purposes Own Account Citigroup trades derivatives for its own account. Trading limits and price verification controls are key aspects
of this activity. |
|
|
Asset/Liability Management Hedging Citigroup uses derivatives in connection with its risk-management activities to hedge certain risks. For example,
Citigroup may issue a fixed rate long-term note and then enter into a receive-fixed, pay-variable-rate interest rate swap with the same tenor and notional amount to convert the interest payments to a net variable-rate basis. This strategy is the
most common form of an interest rate hedge, as it minimizes interest cost in certain yield curve environments. Derivatives are also used to manage risks inherent in specific groups of on-balance sheet assets and liabilities, including investments,
corporate and consumer loans, deposit liabilities, other interest-sensitive assets and liabilities, as well as credit card securitizations, redemptions and sales. In addition, foreign exchange contracts are used to hedge non-U.S. dollar denominated
debt, available-for-sale securities, net capital exposures and foreign exchange transactions. |
Citigroup accounts for its
hedging activity in accordance with SFAS 133. As a general rule, SFAS 133 hedge accounting is permitted for those situations where the Company is exposed to a particular risk, such as interest rate or foreign exchange risk, that causes changes in
the fair value of an asset or liability, or variability in the expected future cash flows of an existing asset, liability, or a forecasted transaction.
Derivative contracts hedging the risks associated with the changes in fair value are referred to as fair value hedges, while contracts hedging the risks affecting the expected future cash flows are called
cash flow hedges. Hedges that utilize derivatives to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with equity investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries are called net investment hedges.
All derivatives are
reported on the balance sheet at fair value. If certain hedging criteria specified in SFAS 133 are met, including testing for hedging effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies for
similar hedges are performed in a similar manner and are used consistently throughout the hedging relationships. For fair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in value of the related hedged item, due
to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. For cash flow hedges and net investment hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative are reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders equity, to the
extent the hedge was effective. Hedge ineffectiveness, in either case, is reflected in current earnings.
Continuing with the example
referred to above, the fixed rate long-term note is recorded at amortized cost under current U.S. GAAP. However, by electing to use SFAS 133 hedge accounting, the carrying value of this note is adjusted for changes in the benchmark floating rate,
with any changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The related interest rate swap is also recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in fair value attributable to changes in interest rates reflected in earnings. Thus,
any ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship is recorded in current earnings. Alternatively, an economic-basis hedge, which does not meet the SFAS 133 hedging criteria, would involve only recording the derivative at fair value on the
balance sheet, with its associated changes in value recorded in earnings. The note would continue to be carried at amortized cost, and therefore, current earnings would be impacted only by the interest rate shifts that cause the change in the
swaps value. This type of hedge is undertaken when SFAS 133 hedge requirements cannot be achieved in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Fair
value hedges
|
|
Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk Citigroup hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate financing transactions, including
liabilities related to outstanding debt, borrowings and time deposits. The fixed cash flows from those financing transactions are converted to benchmark-variable-rate cash flows by entering into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps.
Typically these fair value hedge relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. |
Citigroup also hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate assets, including available-for-sale securities, reverse
repurchase agreements and inter-bank placements. The hedging instruments mainly used are receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps for the remaining hedged asset categories. Most of these fair value hedging relationships use dollar-offset
ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while others use regression analysis.
For a limited number of fair value hedges of benchmark interest rate risk, Citigroup uses the shortcut method as SFAS 133 allows the Company to assume no ineffectiveness if the hedging relationship
involves an interest-bearing financial asset or liability and an interest rate swap. In order to assume no ineffectiveness, Citigroup ensures that all the shortcut method requirements of SFAS 133 for these types of hedging relationships are met.
148
|
|
Hedging of foreign exchange risk Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to foreign exchange rate movements in available-for-sale
securities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity holding the securities, which may be within or outside the U.S. Typically, the hedging instrument employed is a short-term forward foreign exchange
contract. In this type of hedge, the change in fair value of the hedged available-for-sale security attributable to the portion of foreign exchange risk hedged is reported in earnings and not other comprehensive incomea process that serves to
offset substantially the change in fair value of the forward contract that is also reflected in earnings. Citigroup typically considers the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates) as the
cost of hedging; this is generally excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and reflected directly in earnings. Hedge effectiveness is typically assessed based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in spot rates on both the
available-for-sale securities and the forward contracts for the portion of the relationship hedged. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant. |
|
|
Hedging the overall changes in fair value Citigroup primarily hedges the change in the overall fair value of portfolios of similar held-for-sale
mortgage loans. Derivatives used in these hedging relationships are mainly forward sales of mortgage-backed securities. Citigroup assesses effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis using regression analysis. |
Cash flow hedges
|
|
Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk Citigroup hedges variable cash flows resulting from floating-rate financings, including debt, deposits with
stated maturities. Variable cash flows from those financings are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Efforts are made to match all critical terms of the hedged item and the hedging
derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. To the extent all critical terms are not matched, these cash flow hedging relationships use regression or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging
relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Since efforts are made initially to align the terms of the derivatives to those hedged forecasted cash flows, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.
|
Citigroup also hedges variable cash flows resulting from investments in floating-rate available-for-sale
securities, loans and receivables, as well as rollovers of short-term certificates of deposit. Variable cash flows from those assets are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. These cash
flow hedging relationships use regression or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Efforts are made initially to align the terms of the derivatives to
those hedged forecasted cash flows. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.
|
|
Hedging of foreign exchange risk Citigroup locks in the functional currency equivalent of cash flows of various balance sheet exposures, including
deposits, notes and long-term debt (and the forecasted issuances, purchases or rollover of such items) that are denominated |
|
in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuing entity. Depending on the risk management objectives, these types of hedges are designated as
either cash flow hedges of only foreign exchange risk or cash flow hedges of both foreign exchange and interest rate risk. Generally, the hedging instruments used are foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency swaps. Citigroup matches all
critical terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. To the extent all critical terms are not matched, any ineffectiveness is measured using the hypothetical
derivative method as described in FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue G7. Efforts are made initially to match up the terms of the hypothetical and actual derivatives used. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not
significant. |
|
|
Hedging the overall changes in cash flows In situations where the contractual rate of a variable rate asset or liability is not a benchmark rate,
Citigroup designates the risk of overall changes in cash flows as the hedged risk. Citigroup primarily hedges variability in the total cash flows related to non-benchmark-rate-based liabilities, such as customer deposits with stated maturities, and
uses receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps as the hedging instrument. These cash flow hedging relationships use regression or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis.
|
Citigroup also hedges the forecasted purchase of mortgage-backed securities and designates the overall change in the
purchase price as a hedged risk. The assessment of effectiveness is based on ensuring that the critical terms of the hedging instrument and the hedged item match exactly.
Net investment hedges
Consistent with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation
(SFAS 52), SFAS 133 allows hedging of the foreign currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation. Citigroup primarily uses foreign currency forward contracts, short-term borrowings, and to a lesser extent foreign currency future
contracts and foreign-currency-denominated debt instruments, to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with Citigroups equity investments in several non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. In accordance with SFAS 52,
Citigroup records the change in the carrying amount of these investments in the cumulative translation adjustment account within Accumulated other comprehensive income. Simultaneously, the effective portion of the hedge of this exposure is also
recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account, and any ineffective portion of net investment hedges is immediately recorded in earnings.
Achieving hedge accounting in compliance with SFAS 133 guidelines is extremely complex. Key aspects of achieving SFAS 133 hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and
substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any
ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness
may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.
149
The following table summarizes certain information related to the Companys hedging activities for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of effectiveness |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
509 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Net gain excluded from assessment of effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Net investment hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) included in foreign currency translation adjustment within Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
For cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the end-user derivatives remaining in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are generally included in earnings of future periods when earnings are also affected by the variability of the hedged cash flows. The net gains associated with cash
flow hedges expected to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income within 12 months of December 31, 2006 are $107 million.
The change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 can be summarized as follows (after-tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
Net gain (loss) from cash flow hedges |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
Net amounts reclassified to earnings |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
Ending balance |
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
Derivatives may expose Citigroup to market, credit or liquidity risks in excess of the amounts
recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product is the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and other values, and is a function of the type of product, the volume of
transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the transaction where the value of any collateral held is not adequate to
cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to managements assessment as to collectibility. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position
may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.
24. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Concentrations of credit risk exist when changes in economic, industry or geographic
factors similarly affect groups of counterparties whose aggregate credit exposure is material in relation to Citigroups total credit exposure. Although Citigroups portfolio of financial instruments is broadly diversified along industry,
product, and geographic lines, material transactions are completed with other financial institutions, particularly in the securities trading, derivatives, and foreign exchange businesses.
In connection with the Companys efforts to maintain a diversified portfolio, the Company limits its exposure to any one geographic region, country
or individual creditor and monitors this exposure on a continuous basis. At December 31, 2006, Citigroups most significant concentration of credit risk was with the U.S. government and its agencies. The Companys exposure, which
primarily results from trading assets and investments issued by the U.S. government and its agencies, amounted to $140.2 billion and $78.0 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. After the U.S. government, the Companys next
largest exposure is to the Mexican government and its agencies, which are rated investment grade by both Moodys and S&P. The Companys exposure amounted to $20.9 billion and $20.7 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and is composed of investment securities, loans, and trading assets.
25. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table on the next page presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroups financial instruments. The disclosure excludes leases, affiliate investments,
pension and benefit obligations, and insurance policy claim reserves. In addition, contractholder fund amounts exclude certain insurance contracts. Also as required, the disclosure excludes the effect of taxes, any premium or discount that could
result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular instrument, excess fair value associated with deposits with no fixed maturity and other expenses that would be incurred in a market transaction. In addition, the table
excludes the values of non-financial assets and liabilities, as well as a wide range of franchise, relationship, and intangible values (but includes mortgage servicing rights), which are integral to a full assessment of Citigroups financial
position and the value of its net assets.
The fair value represents managements best estimates based on a range of methodologies and
assumptions. The carrying value of short-term financial instruments, as well as receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and
expected realization. Quoted market prices are used for most investments and for both trading and end-user derivatives, as well as for liabilities, such as long-term debt, with quoted prices. For performing loans, contractual cash flows are
discounted at quoted secondary market rates or estimated market rates if available. Otherwise, sales of comparable loan portfolios or current market origination rates for loans with similar terms and risk characteristics are used. For loans with
doubt as to collectibility, expected cash flows are discounted using an appropriate rate considering the time of collection and the premium for the uncertainty of the flows. The value of collateral is also considered. For liabilities such as
long-term debt without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest are used to discount contractual cash flows.
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 (1) |
In billions of dollars at year end |
|
Carrying value |
|
Estimated fair value |
|
Carrying value |
|
Estimated fair value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
$ |
273.6 |
|
$ |
273.6 |
|
$ |
180.6 |
|
$ |
180.6 |
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
282.8 |
|
|
282.8 |
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
217.5 |
Trading account assets |
|
|
393.9 |
|
|
393.9 |
|
|
295.8 |
|
|
295.8 |
Loans (2) |
|
|
660.5 |
|
|
673.3 |
|
|
563.8 |
|
|
580.2 |
Other financial assets (3) |
|
|
172.8 |
|
|
172.9 |
|
|
145.2 |
|
|
145.2 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
712.0 |
|
$ |
711.0 |
|
$ |
591.8 |
|
$ |
591.5 |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
349.2 |
|
|
349.2 |
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
242.4 |
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
145.9 |
|
|
145.9 |
|
|
121.1 |
|
|
121.1 |
Long-term debt (4) |
|
|
288.5 |
|
|
289.1 |
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
218.9 |
Other financial liabilities (5) |
|
|
229.1 |
|
|
229.1 |
|
|
169.0 |
|
|
169.0 |
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
(2) |
The carrying value of loans is net of the allowance for loan losses and also excludes $9.8 billion and $9.9 billion of lease finance receivables in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
(3) |
Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverable, mortgage servicing rights and separate and variable accounts for which the carrying
value is a reasonable estimate of fair value, and the carrying value and estimated fair value of financial instruments included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(4) |
Trust preferred securities were deconsolidated during 2004 in accordance with FIN 46-R with the resulting liabilities to the trust companies included as a component of long-term debt. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the carrying value was $9.8 billion and $6.5 billion, respectively, and the fair value was $9.9 billion and $6.3 billion, respectively. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 139.
|
(5) |
Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, and short-term borrowings for which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value, and the carrying value and
estimated fair value of financial instruments included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
Fair values
vary from period to period based on changes in a wide range of factors, including interest rates, credit quality, and market perceptions of value, and as existing assets and liabilities run off and new transactions are entered into.
The estimated fair values of loans reflect changes in credit status since the loans were made, changes in interest rates in the case of fixed-rate loans,
and premium values at origination of certain loans. The estimated fair values of Citigroups loans, in the aggregate, exceeded the carrying values (reduced by the allowance for loan losses) by $12.8 billion in 2006 and $16.4 billion in 2005.
Within these totals, estimated fair values exceeded carrying values for consumer loans net of the allowance by $9.0 billion, a decrease of $3.5 billion from 2005, and an increase for corporate loans net of the allowance by $3.8 billion, a decrease
of $0.1 billion from 2005.
26. PLEDGED ASSETS, COLLATERAL, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES
Pledged Assets
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the approximate fair values
of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other assets pledged, excluding the impact of FIN 39 and FIN 41, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
For securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
359,273 |
|
$ |
322,188 |
As collateral for securities borrowed for approximately equivalent value |
|
|
39,382 |
|
|
45,671 |
As collateral on bank loans |
|
|
10,832 |
|
|
51,841 |
To clearing organizations or segregated under securities laws and regulations |
|
|
30,675 |
|
|
31,649 |
For securities loaned |
|
|
84,118 |
|
|
49,666 |
Other |
|
|
169,922 |
|
|
38,219 |
Total |
|
$ |
694,202 |
|
$ |
539,234 |
In addition, included in cash and due from banks at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are $8.5
billion and $5.1 billion, respectively, of cash segregated under federal and other brokerage regulations or deposited with clearing organizations.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had $2.3 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, of outstanding letters of credit from third-party banks to satisfy various collateral and margin requirements.
Collateral
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the approximate market value of
collateral received by the Company that may be sold or repledged by the Company, excluding amounts netted in accordance with FIN 39 and FIN 41, was $403.9 billion and $409.1 billion, respectively. This collateral was received in connection with
resale agreements, securities borrowings and loans, derivative transactions, and margined broker loans.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005,
a substantial portion of the collateral received by the Company had been sold or repledged in connection with repurchase agreements; securities sold, not yet purchased; securities borrowings and loans; pledges to clearing organizations; segregation
requirements under securities laws and regulations; derivative transactions; and bank loans.
In addition, at December 31, 2006 and
2005, the Company had pledged $222 billion and $295 billion, respectively, of collateral that may not be sold or repledged by the secured parties.
Lease
Commitments
Rental expense (principally for offices and computer equipment) was $1.9 billion, $1.8 billion, and $1.7 billion for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
151
Future minimum annual rentals under noncancelable leases, net of sublease income, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,406 |
2008 |
|
|
1,278 |
2009 |
|
|
1,147 |
2010 |
|
|
976 |
2011 |
|
|
832 |
Thereafter |
|
|
4,552 |
Total |
|
$ |
10,191 |
Loan Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
One- to four-family residential mortgages |
|
$ |
3,457 |
|
$ |
3,343 |
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties |
|
|
32,449 |
|
|
25,089 |
Commercial real estate, construction and land development |
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
2,283 |
Credit card lines (1) |
|
|
987,409 |
|
|
859,504 |
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments (2) |
|
|
439,931 |
|
|
346,444 |
Total |
|
$ |
1,467,253 |
|
$ |
1,236,663 |
(1) |
Credit card lines are unconditionally cancelable by the issuer. |
(2) |
Includes commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities. Amounts include $251 billion
and $179 billion with original maturity of less than one year at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
The majority of unused commitments are
contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon
exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period. The table does not include unfunded commercial letters of credit issued on behalf of customers and collateralized
by the underlying shipment of goods that totaled $7.9 billion and $5.8 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Obligations Under Guarantees
The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a
wide variety of business transactions. The following table summarizes at December 31, 2006 and 2005 all of the Companys guarantees and indemnifications, where management believes the guarantees and indemnifications are related to an
asset, liability, or equity security of the guaranteed parties at the inception of the contract. The maximum potential amount of future payments represents the notional amounts that could be lost under the guarantees and indemnifications if there
were a total default by the guaranteed parties, without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses on these guarantees and
indemnifications and greatly exceed anticipated losses.
The following tables present information about the Companys guarantees
at December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential Amount of Future Payments |
|
Carrying value |
In billions of dollars at December 31, except carrying value in millions |
|
Expire within 1 year |
|
Expire after 1 year |
|
Total amount outstanding |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
$ |
206.0 |
Performance guarantees |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
20.5 |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
916.6 |
|
|
958.6 |
|
|
16,836.0 |
Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold with recourse |
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
51.9 |
Securities lending indemnifications (1) |
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
Credit card merchant processing (1) |
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
Custody indemnifications (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
262.9 |
|
$ |
1,003.0 |
|
$ |
1,265.9 |
|
$ |
17,114.4 |
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
$ |
52.4 |
|
$ |
175.2 |
Performance guarantees |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
18.2 |
Derivative instruments (2) |
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
477.7 |
|
|
518.2 |
|
|
14,425.2 |
Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
Loans sold with recourse |
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
58.4 |
Securities lending indemnifications (1) |
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
Credit card merchant processing (1) |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
Custody indemnifications (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
177.6 |
|
$ |
531.8 |
|
$ |
709.4 |
|
$ |
14,677.0 |
(1) |
The carrying values of guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications, credit card merchant processing, and custody indemnifications are not material
as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant and the carrying amount of the Companys obligations under these guarantees is immaterial.
|
(2) |
Reclassified to conform to current periods presentation. |
152
Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond
underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and that support options and purchases of securities or in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade
acceptances. Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customers tender bid on a construction or systems installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are
also issued to support a customers obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.
Derivative instruments include credit default swaps, total return swaps, written foreign exchange options, written put options, and written equity warrants. Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows protect investors in credit card
receivables securitization trusts from loss of interest relating to insufficient collections on the underlying receivables in the trusts. Loans sold with recourse represent the Companys obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under
certain circumstances. Securities lending indemnifications are issued to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and
collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security. Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Companys indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on
behalf of merchants. Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian fails to safeguard clients assets. Beginning with the 2006 third quarter, the scope of
the custody indemnifications was broadened to cover all clients assets held by third-party subcustodians.
Citigroups primary
credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the Company provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcard and private label cards. In the 2005 third quarter, the Company
entered into a partnership under which a third party processes bankcard transactions. As a result, in the event of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the
cardholders favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liability to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the third party is unable to collect this amount from the merchant,
it bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.
The Company continues to have the primary contingent
liability with respect to its portfolio of private label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right
to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk, the third party or the Company may require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third
party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a
private label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private label cardholders, Citigroup is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although a third party holds the primary contingent liability
with respect to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or
sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.
The Companys maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the
requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $52 billion and $28 billion, respectively.
However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure, based on the Companys
historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards). In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items
are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of
unresolved chargebacks and its historical loss experience. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Companys contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were
immaterial.
In addition, the Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its
card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not
included in the table on page 152, since the total outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it
is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. Actual losses related to these programs were not material during 2006 and 2005. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential
liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At December 31, 2006, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Companys obligations related to these programs were
immaterial.
In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts
in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax
law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the
underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Companys own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business
based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the
conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not
153
possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in
the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. There are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 related to these indemnifications and they are not included in the table on page 152.
In addition, the Company is a
member of or shareholder in hundreds of value transfer networks (VTNs) (payment, clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to
backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a members default on its obligations. The Companys potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are excluded from the scope of FIN 45, since the shareholders and members
represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Companys participation in VTNs is not reported in the table on page 152 and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006
or 2005 for potential obligations that could arise from the Companys involvement with VTN associations.
At December 31, 2006 and
2005, the carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table on page 152 amounted to approximately $17 billion and $15 billion, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is
included in either trading liabilities or other liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included in other liabilities. For
loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included in other liabilities. In addition, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1.1
billion and $850 million, respectively, relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments.
In addition to the collateral
available in respect of the credit card merchant processing contingent liability discussed above, the Company has collateral available to reimburse potential losses on its other guarantees. Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse
losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $92 billion and $55 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $42 billion and $24
billion and letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $142 million and $681 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain
guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.
Loans Sold with Credit Enhancements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions of dollars at year end |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Form of credit enhancement |
Residential mortgages and other loans sold with recourse (1) |
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
2006: Recourse obligation of $1.7 2005: Recourse obligation of $1.3 |
GNMA sales/servicing agreements (2) |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
29.1 |
|
Secondary recourse obligation |
Securitized credit card receivables |
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
$ |
96.2 |
|
Includes net revenue over the life of the transaction. Also includes other recourse obligations of $9.1 in
2006 and $7.3 in 2005 |
(1) |
Residential mortgages represent 24% of amounts in 2006 and 25% in 2005. |
(2) |
Government National Mortgage Association sales/servicing agreements covering securitized residential mortgages. |
Citigroup and its subsidiaries are obligated under various credit enhancements related to certain sales of loans or sales of participations in pools of loans, as summarized above.
Net revenue on securitized credit card receivables is collected over the life of each sale transaction. The net revenue is based upon the sum of finance
charges and fees received from cardholders and interchange revenue earned on cardholder transactions, less the sum of the yield paid to investors, credit losses, transaction costs, and a contractual servicing fee, which is also retained by certain
Citigroup subsidiaries as servicers. The amount contained in these accounts is included in other assets and was $14 million at December 31, 2006 and $114 million at December 31, 2005.
Financial Guarantees
Financial guarantees are used in various transactions to
enhance the credit standing of Citigroup customers. They represent irrevocable assurances, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, that Citigroup will make payment in the event that the customer fails to fulfill its obligations to third
parties.
Citigroup issues financial standby letters of credit, which are obligations to pay a third-party beneficiary when a customer fails
to repay an outstanding loan or debt instrument, such as assuring payments by a foreign reinsurer to a U.S. insurer, to act as a substitute for an escrow account, to provide a payment mechanism for a customers third-party obligations, and to
assure payment of specified financial obligations of a customer. Fees are recognized ratably over the term of the standby letter of credit. The following table summarizes financial standby letters of credit issued by Citigroup. The table does not
include securities lending indemnifications issued to customers, which are fully collateralized and totaled $110.7 billion at December 31, 2006 and $68.4 billion at December 31, 2005, and performance standby letters of credit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
In billions of dollars at year end |
|
Expire within 1 year |
|
Expire after 1 year |
|
Total amount outstanding |
|
|
|
Total amount outstanding |
Insurance, surety |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
Options, purchased securities, and escrow |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clean letters of credit |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
Other debt-related |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
28.4 |
Total (1) |
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
$ |
24.7 |
|
$ |
68.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
49.2 |
(1) |
Total is net of cash collateral of $4.5 billion in 2006 and $3.2 billion in 2005. Collateral other than cash covered 10% of the total in 2006 and 14% in 2005.
|
154
27. CONTINGENCIES
As described in the Legal Proceedings discussion on page 169, the Company has been a defendant
in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising out of alleged misconduct in connection with:
|
(i) |
underwritings for, and research coverage of, WorldCom; |
|
(ii) |
underwritings for Enron and other transactions and activities related to Enron; |
|
(iii) |
transactions and activities related to research coverage of companies other than WorldCom; and |
|
(iv) |
transactions and activities related to the IPO Securities Litigation. |
As of December 31, 2006, the Companys litigation reserve for these matters, net of amounts previously paid or not yet paid but committed to be paid in connection with the Enron class action settlement and
other settlements arising out of these matters, was approximately $3.2 billion.
The Company believes that this reserve is adequate to meet
all of its remaining exposure for these matters. However, in view of the large number of these matters, the uncertainties of the timing and outcome of this type of litigation, the novel issues presented, and the significant amounts involved, it is
possible that the ultimate costs of these matters may exceed or be below the reserve. The Company will continue to defend itself vigorously in these cases, and seek to resolve them in the manner management believes is in the best interests of the
Company.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are defendants or co-defendants or parties in
various litigation and regulatory matters incidental to and typical of the businesses in which they are engaged. In the opinion of the Companys management, the ultimate resolution of these legal and regulatory proceedings would not be likely
to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company but, if involving monetary liability, may be material to the Companys operating results for any particular period.
28. CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
In millions of dollars, except shares |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
Preferred stock ($100 par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
Redemption or retirement of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
Common stock ($20 par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year Shares: 37,534,553 in 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
Balance, end of year Shares: 37,534,553 in 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
37,978 |
|
|
$ |
35,194 |
|
|
$ |
32,593 |
|
Capital contribution from parent company |
|
|
5,589 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
Employee benefit plans |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Other |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
43,753 |
|
|
$ |
37,978 |
|
|
$ |
35,194 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
24,062 |
|
|
$ |
20,675 |
|
|
$ |
15,945 |
|
Net income |
|
|
9,338 |
|
|
|
9,077 |
|
|
|
9,063 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
|
|
(5,690 |
) |
|
|
(4,333 |
) |
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
30,358 |
|
|
$ |
24,062 |
|
|
$ |
20,675 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
(2,550 |
) |
|
$ |
(624 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,147 |
) |
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, available-for-sale, net of taxes |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes |
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
(1,501 |
) |
|
|
1,147 |
|
Net change for cash flow hedges, net of taxes |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of taxes |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
$ |
(1,926 |
) |
|
$ |
523 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
(1,709 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,550 |
) |
|
$ |
(624 |
) |
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
60,241 |
|
|
$ |
57,946 |
|
|
$ |
50,092 |
|
Changes during the year, net |
|
|
12,912 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
7,854 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
$ |
73,153 |
|
|
$ |
60,241 |
|
|
$ |
57,946 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,338 |
|
|
$ |
9,077 |
|
|
$ |
9,063 |
|
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
|
|
523 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
10,179 |
|
|
$ |
7,151 |
|
|
$ |
9,586 |
|
(1) |
The 2005 and 2004 Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity for Citibank, N.A. has been restated in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations to reflect the
impact of the bank consolidation project in which several affiliates were transferred between Citibank, N.A. and other affiliates under the common control of Citigroup. See Note 29 on page 156 for a full description of the bank consolidation project
|
155
29. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
These condensed consolidating financial statement schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the consolidated
financial statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.
Bank Consolidation Project
During 2006, Citigroup began and completed a majority of its bank consolidation project, which called for the merger of its 12 U.S.-insured depository institutions into four, as well as the reorganization of its U.S.
mortgage banking business. The first phase of this project was completed in July 2006, when CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, transferred its ownership of Citicorp Trust Bank, fsb to Citigroup. The
second phase occurred in October 2006, when Citigroup reduced its overall number of U.S.-insured depository institutions from twelve to five. Also during this phase, Citibank, N.A. transferred its investment in Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (the
Companys primary banking entity responsible for U.S. credit card activities) to Citigroup. In addition, a majority of the Companys U.S. consumer mortgage lending activity was consolidated within Citibank, N.A. as Citibank (West), FSB,
Citibank Texas, N.A., Citibank, FSB and Citibank Delaware were merged into Citibank, N.A. The final phase of this consolidation project is expected to be completed at a later date with the merger of Citibank (Banamex USA) into Citibank, N.A.
Merger of Bank Holding Companies
On August 1, 2005,
Citigroup merged its two intermediate bank holding companies, Citigroup Holdings Company and Citicorp, into Citigroup Inc. Coinciding with this merger, Citigroup assumed all existing indebtedness and outstanding guarantees of Citicorp.
During the 2005 second quarter, Citigroup also consolidated its capital markets funding activities into two legal entities: (i) Citigroup Inc.,
which issues long-term debt, trust preferred securities, and preferred and common stock, and (ii) Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI), a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked
and credit-linked notes, all of which is guaranteed by Citigroup.
As part of the funding consolidation, Citigroup also guaranteed and
continues to guarantee various debt obligations of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHIs publicly-issued securities. CGMHI no longer files periodic reports with the SEC
and continues to be rated on the basis of a guarantee of its financial obligations from Citigroup.
The condensed financial statements on
pages 157-164, which were restated, where applicable, to reflect the above reorganizations, include the financial results of the following Citigroup entities:
Citigroup Parent Company
The holding company, Citigroup Inc.
Citigroup Global Markets
Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)
Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHIs
publicly-issued debt.
Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)
CFI is a
first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.
CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)
An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Associates. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.
Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)
A wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and
commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup
guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC.
Other Citigroup Subsidiaries
Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and income/loss from discontinued operations.
Consolidating Adjustments
Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment
in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.
156
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
|
CCC |
|
Associates |
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations and income from discontinued operations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies |
|
$ |
17,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,327 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
23,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,989 |
|
|
7,073 |
|
|
65,148 |
|
|
|
(5,989 |
) |
|
|
96,431 |
Interest revenue intercompany |
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
419 |
|
|
(8,538 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,041 |
|
|
|
18,787 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
722 |
|
|
29,240 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
56,943 |
Interest expense intercompany |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
(6,249 |
) |
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
(1,322 |
) |
|
$ |
2,638 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
4,177 |
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
$ |
33,619 |
|
|
$ |
(4,177 |
) |
|
$ |
39,488 |
Commissions and fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,830 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
156 |
|
$ |
9,549 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
19,535 |
Commissions and fees intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,708 |
Principal transactions intercompany |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
618 |
|
|
18,215 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
22,884 |
Other income intercompany |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
Total non-interest revenues |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
18,518 |
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
576 |
|
$ |
849 |
|
$ |
30,829 |
|
|
$ |
(576 |
) |
|
$ |
50,127 |
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
16,041 |
|
|
$ |
21,156 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
$ |
5,147 |
|
$ |
64,448 |
|
|
$ |
(22,080 |
) |
|
$ |
89,615 |
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
$ |
6,490 |
|
|
$ |
(1,209 |
) |
|
$ |
7,955 |
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
11,240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
$ |
967 |
|
$ |
17,977 |
|
|
$ |
(759 |
) |
|
$ |
30,277 |
Compensation and benefits intercompany |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
138 |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
3,661 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
690 |
|
|
17,218 |
|
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
21,744 |
Other expense intercompany |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
266 |
|
|
(2,092 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
16,529 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
$ |
32,957 |
|
|
$ |
(1,622 |
) |
|
$ |
52,021 |
Income from continuing operations before taxes, minority interest, and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries |
|
$ |
15,612 |
|
|
$ |
4,557 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
$ |
25,001 |
|
|
$ |
(19,249 |
) |
|
$ |
29,639 |
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
545 |
|
|
6,928 |
|
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
8,101 |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries |
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,169 |
) |
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
3,213 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
$ |
17,784 |
|
|
$ |
(23,731 |
) |
|
$ |
21,249 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
Net income |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
3,302 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
$ |
17,984 |
|
|
$ |
(23,731 |
) |
|
$ |
21,538 |
157
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations and income from discontinued operations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies |
|
$ |
28,220 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(28,220 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
16,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,586 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
52,541 |
|
|
|
(5,586 |
) |
|
|
75,916 |
|
Interest revenue intercompany |
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(4,282 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
18,663 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
36,676 |
|
Interest expense intercompany |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
(2,588 |
) |
|
|
(1,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
(714 |
) |
|
$ |
3,211 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
3,985 |
|
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
|
$ |
32,184 |
|
|
$ |
(3,985 |
) |
|
$ |
39,240 |
|
Commissions and fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,287 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
8,791 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
17,143 |
|
Commissions and fees intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
Principal transactions intercompany |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(2,208 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
16,726 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
20,816 |
|
Other income intercompany |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest revenues |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
14,342 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
29,048 |
|
|
$ |
(629 |
) |
|
$ |
44,402 |
|
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
27,921 |
|
|
$ |
17,553 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,614 |
|
|
$ |
5,155 |
|
|
$ |
61,232 |
|
|
$ |
(32,834 |
) |
|
$ |
83,642 |
|
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,849 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
6,990 |
|
|
$ |
(1,849 |
) |
|
$ |
9,046 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
9,392 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
15,363 |
|
|
$ |
(726 |
) |
|
$ |
25,772 |
|
Compensation and benefits intercompany |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
16,162 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
19,391 |
|
Other expense intercompany |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
13,199 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
|
$ |
1,831 |
|
|
$ |
29,694 |
|
|
$ |
(1,513 |
) |
|
$ |
45,163 |
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes, minority interest, cumulative effect of accounting change, and equity in undistributed income of
subsidiaries |
|
$ |
27,487 |
|
|
$ |
4,327 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
$ |
24,548 |
|
|
$ |
(29,472 |
) |
|
$ |
29,433 |
|
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
9,078 |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549 |
|
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries |
|
|
(3,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
24,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,886 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
16,525 |
|
|
$ |
(25,796 |
) |
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
|
$ |
5,084 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
19,122 |
|
|
$ |
(25,796 |
) |
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
158
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations and income from discontinued operations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies |
|
$ |
7,503 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,503 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,853 |
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
|
|
46,435 |
|
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
|
|
63,621 |
Interest revenue intercompany |
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
6,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
12,203 |
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
22,004 |
Interest expense intercompany |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(1,269 |
) |
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
$ |
5,391 |
|
|
$ |
32,640 |
|
|
$ |
(4,295 |
) |
|
$ |
41,617 |
Commissions and fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,704 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
8,209 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
15,981 |
Commissions and fees intercompany |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,716 |
Principal transactions intercompany |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
15,171 |
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
18,321 |
Other income intercompany |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
Total non-interest revenues |
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
$ |
12,269 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
634 |
|
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
25,118 |
|
|
$ |
(634 |
) |
|
$ |
38,018 |
Total revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
7,343 |
|
|
$ |
15,911 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,929 |
|
|
$ |
6,126 |
|
|
$ |
57,758 |
|
|
$ |
(12,432 |
) |
|
$ |
79,635 |
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,872 |
|
|
$ |
2,074 |
|
|
$ |
5,045 |
|
|
$ |
(1,872 |
) |
|
$ |
7,117 |
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
8,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
13,226 |
|
|
$ |
(933 |
) |
|
$ |
22,934 |
Compensation and benefits intercompany |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
8,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
26,848 |
Other expense intercompany |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
18,511 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,006 |
|
|
$ |
28,961 |
|
|
$ |
(1,729 |
) |
|
$ |
49,782 |
Income from continuing operations before taxes, minority interest, and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries |
|
$ |
7,039 |
|
|
$ |
(2,598 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
2,046 |
|
|
$ |
23,752 |
|
|
$ |
(8,831 |
) |
|
$ |
22,736 |
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
7,270 |
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
6,464 |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries |
|
|
9,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,690 |
) |
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
$ |
(1,556 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
1,493 |
|
|
$ |
16,264 |
|
|
$ |
(18,039 |
) |
|
$ |
16,054 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992 |
Net income |
|
$ |
17,046 |
|
|
$ |
(1,441 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
1,493 |
|
|
$ |
17,141 |
|
|
$ |
(18,039 |
) |
|
$ |
17,046 |
159
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,752 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
22,449 |
|
|
$ |
(216 |
) |
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
Cash and due from banks intercompany |
|
|
21 |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
269,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,817 |
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
38 |
|
|
281,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
112,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,925 |
|
Trading account assets intercompany |
|
|
224 |
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(6,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
261,695 |
|
|
|
(2,290 |
) |
|
|
273,591 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,809 |
|
|
|
53,614 |
|
|
|
624,646 |
|
|
|
(44,809 |
) |
|
|
679,192 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,206 |
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
11,234 |
|
|
|
(47,440 |
) |
|
|
(8,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
(1,099 |
) |
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
(8,940 |
) |
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
36,206 |
|
$ |
51,971 |
|
|
$ |
63,749 |
|
|
$ |
569,425 |
|
|
$ |
(51,971 |
) |
|
$ |
670,252 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
90,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
146,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,234 |
|
|
66,761 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
6,208 |
|
|
|
155,464 |
|
|
|
(4,708 |
) |
|
|
237,219 |
|
Other assets intercompany |
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
51,343 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
(70,853 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
257,590 |
|
$ |
651,423 |
|
|
$ |
88,102 |
|
$ |
59,617 |
|
|
$ |
73,701 |
|
|
$ |
960,406 |
|
|
$ |
(206,521 |
) |
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
712,041 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
712,041 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold |
|
|
|
|
|
304,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,235 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold intercompany |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
106,174 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,887 |
|
Trading account liabilities intercompany |
|
|
128 |
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
32 |
|
|
14,102 |
|
|
|
43,345 |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
40,217 |
|
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
100,833 |
|
Short-term borrowings intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
47,178 |
|
|
|
22,494 |
|
|
9,739 |
|
|
|
24,130 |
|
|
|
(93,802 |
) |
|
|
(9,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
125,351 |
|
|
28,719 |
|
|
|
18,847 |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
102,355 |
|
|
|
(2,904 |
) |
|
|
288,494 |
|
Long-term debt intercompany |
|
|
399 |
|
|
24,038 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
33,050 |
|
|
|
24,349 |
|
|
|
(50,430 |
) |
|
|
(33,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances from subsidiaries |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
95,113 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
65,353 |
|
|
|
(1,362 |
) |
|
|
168,045 |
|
Other liabilities intercompany |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
6,498 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(8,182 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
119,783 |
|
|
20,019 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
10,733 |
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
118,240 |
|
|
|
(157,637 |
) |
|
|
119,783 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
257,590 |
|
$ |
651,423 |
|
|
$ |
88,102 |
|
$ |
59,617 |
|
|
$ |
73,701 |
|
|
$ |
960,406 |
|
|
$ |
(206,521 |
) |
|
$ |
1,884,318 |
|
160
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 (1) |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
96 |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
19,680 |
|
|
$ |
(206 |
) |
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
Cash and due from banks intercompany |
|
|
151 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
(1,085 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
204,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,464 |
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
5,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
25 |
|
|
207,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
88,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,820 |
|
Trading account assets intercompany |
|
|
209 |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
8,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
169,166 |
|
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
180,597 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,408 |
|
|
|
50,225 |
|
|
|
532,158 |
|
|
|
(41,408 |
) |
|
|
583,503 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,057 |
|
|
6,058 |
|
|
|
8,581 |
|
|
|
(26,638 |
) |
|
|
(6,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
(8,287 |
) |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
(9,782 |
) |
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
18,057 |
|
$ |
46,192 |
|
|
$ |
57,377 |
|
|
$ |
497,233 |
|
|
$ |
(46,192 |
) |
|
$ |
573,721 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
71,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
135,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
65,451 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
125,075 |
|
|
|
(4,953 |
) |
|
|
202,803 |
|
Other assets intercompany |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
9,075 |
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(44,664 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
223,253 |
|
$ |
499,766 |
|
|
$ |
50,971 |
|
$ |
54,540 |
|
|
$ |
68,468 |
|
|
$ |
786,655 |
|
|
$ |
(189,616 |
) |
|
$ |
1,494,037 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
591,827 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
591,828 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold |
|
|
|
|
|
202,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,392 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold intercompany |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
79,020 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,108 |
|
Trading account liabilities intercompany |
|
|
68 |
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
34 |
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
3,103 |
|
|
|
19,962 |
|
|
|
(1,520 |
) |
|
|
66,930 |
|
Short-term borrowings intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
29,579 |
|
|
|
11,209 |
|
|
5,989 |
|
|
|
8,815 |
|
|
|
(49,603 |
) |
|
|
(5,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
100,600 |
|
|
39,214 |
|
|
|
5,961 |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
14,032 |
|
|
|
57,692 |
|
|
|
(3,785 |
) |
|
|
217,499 |
|
Long-term debt intercompany |
|
|
451 |
|
|
17,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,089 |
|
|
|
35,211 |
|
|
|
(53,333 |
) |
|
|
(32,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances from subsidiaries |
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
89,774 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
47,871 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
141,743 |
|
Other liabilities intercompany |
|
|
939 |
|
|
5,778 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(6,992 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
112,537 |
|
|
21,543 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
9,306 |
|
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
107,445 |
|
|
|
(144,382 |
) |
|
|
112,537 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
223,253 |
|
$ |
499,766 |
|
|
$ |
50,971 |
|
$ |
54,540 |
|
|
$ |
68,468 |
|
|
$ |
786,655 |
|
|
$ |
(189,616 |
) |
|
$ |
1,494,037 |
|
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. |
161
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
17,391 |
|
|
$ |
(6,938 |
) |
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
|
$ |
3,849 |
|
|
$ |
(14,256 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,805 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(350,239 |
) |
|
$ |
5,805 |
|
|
$ |
(356,062 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,176 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(15,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(6,103 |
) |
|
|
(274,023 |
) |
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
(296,124 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
80,596 |
|
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
86,999 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
10,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
105,691 |
|
|
|
(3,451 |
) |
|
|
121,111 |
|
Changes in investments and advances intercompany |
|
|
(21,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,114 |
) |
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
(2,653 |
) |
|
|
60,309 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,306 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(22,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,248 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,114 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,694 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(133,360 |
) |
|
$ |
7,694 |
|
|
$ |
(204,206 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
$ |
(9,826 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,826 |
) |
Dividends paid intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
Redemption or retirement of preferred stock |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt third-party, net |
|
|
22,202 |
|
|
|
(11,353 |
) |
|
|
14,522 |
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
42,658 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
67,219 |
|
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt intercompany, net |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
(10,862 |
) |
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,203 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
121,203 |
|
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings third-party |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
21,826 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
33,903 |
|
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances intercompany |
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
|
17,598 |
|
|
|
12,224 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
15,446 |
|
|
|
(43,558 |
) |
|
|
(3,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(1,410 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(742 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
4,600 |
|
|
$ |
11,694 |
|
|
$ |
36,255 |
|
|
$ |
3,749 |
|
|
$ |
4,045 |
|
|
$ |
149,836 |
|
|
$ |
(3,749 |
) |
|
$ |
206,430 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
(373 |
) |
|
$ |
2,974 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
2,882 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
3,913 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
18,595 |
|
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
23,632 |
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period from continuing operations |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
4,421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
$ |
21,569 |
|
|
$ |
(388 |
) |
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(1,021 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
593 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
7,744 |
|
|
$ |
(593 |
) |
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
Interest |
|
|
5,492 |
|
|
|
20,720 |
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
21,884 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
51,472 |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
(1,077 |
) |
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
162
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
22,409 |
|
|
$ |
(10,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
3,441 |
|
|
$ |
4,556 |
|
|
$ |
15,955 |
|
|
$ |
(3,441 |
) |
|
$ |
32,044 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,584 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,175 |
) |
|
$ |
(286,766 |
) |
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
(291,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
244,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,335 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(9,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,384 |
) |
|
|
(10,038 |
) |
|
|
(183,195 |
) |
|
|
8,384 |
|
|
|
(203,023 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,148 |
|
|
|
7,627 |
|
|
|
67,836 |
|
|
|
(7,148 |
) |
|
|
82,603 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
91,797 |
|
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
|
|
97,513 |
|
Changes in investments and advancesintercompany |
|
|
(9,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,721 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(3,254 |
) |
|
|
63,557 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,951 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
$ |
(9,032 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,721 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,087 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,831 |
) |
|
$ |
7,824 |
|
|
$ |
6,087 |
|
|
$ |
(60,223 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
$ |
(9,188 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,188 |
) |
Dividends paidintercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(12,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,794 |
) |
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt third-party, net |
|
|
12,218 |
|
|
|
(3,581 |
) |
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debtintercompany, net |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
(5,443 |
) |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
(4,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,713 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27,713 |
|
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowingsthird-party |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(15,423 |
) |
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
(9,991 |
) |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
10,163 |
|
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances intercompany |
|
|
(4,574 |
) |
|
|
28,988 |
|
|
|
11,208 |
|
|
|
(2,306 |
) |
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
(43,774 |
) |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(698 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
(13,265 |
) |
|
$ |
12,923 |
|
|
$ |
50,817 |
|
|
$ |
2,932 |
|
|
$ |
2,567 |
|
|
$ |
(19,958 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,932 |
) |
|
$ |
33,084 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,840 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,840 |
) |
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
Net increase in cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
$ |
(286 |
) |
|
$ |
3,019 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
16,660 |
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
20,613 |
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period from continuing operations |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
3,913 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
$ |
18,595 |
|
|
$ |
(687 |
) |
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(544 |
) |
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
8,078 |
|
|
$ |
(748 |
) |
|
$ |
8,621 |
|
Interest |
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
12,889 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
14,071 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
32,081 |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,044 |
) |
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
163
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
Citigroup parent company |
|
|
CGMHI |
|
|
CFI |
|
CCC |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations |
|
|
Consolidating adjustments |
|
|
Citigroup consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
7,512 |
|
|
$ |
(18,407 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,074 |
|
|
$ |
12,702 |
|
|
$ |
(3,916 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,074 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,109 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(233 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,406 |
|
|
$ |
5,151 |
|
|
$ |
(264,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,406 |
) |
|
$ |
(259,751 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,421 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(17,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,605 |
) |
|
|
(4,272 |
) |
|
|
(174,539 |
) |
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
(195,903 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
10,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
99,223 |
|
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
|
|
112,470 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
55,794 |
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
63,318 |
|
Changes in investments and advances intercompany |
|
|
(12,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(975 |
) |
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,179 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
$ |
(13,469 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,650 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,143 |
|
|
$ |
3,256 |
|
|
$ |
(66,438 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(80,301 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
$ |
(8,375 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,375 |
) |
Dividends paid intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
912 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt third-party, net |
|
|
16,616 |
|
|
|
8,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(3,667 |
) |
|
|
4,756 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
26,078 |
|
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt intercompany, net |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
5,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,319 |
) |
|
|
(11,676 |
) |
|
|
5,881 |
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,651 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
65,651 |
|
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings third-party |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(6,644 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(4,363 |
) |
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances intercompany |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(3,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
4,020 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
5,969 |
|
|
$ |
20,845 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(6,375 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,131 |
) |
|
$ |
72,461 |
|
|
$ |
6,375 |
|
|
$ |
83,144 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(1,212 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
2,710 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
4,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
13,950 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
19,276 |
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period from continuing operations |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
3,234 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
584 |
|
|
$ |
16,660 |
|
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
$ |
20,613 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(403 |
) |
|
$ |
1,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
5,455 |
|
|
$ |
(746 |
) |
|
$ |
6,808 |
|
Interest |
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
9,541 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
18,544 |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
(636 |
) |
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
164
30. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
Revenues, net of interest expense |
|
$ |
23,828 |
|
$ |
21,422 |
|
$ |
22,182 |
|
$ |
22,183 |
|
$ |
20,779 |
|
|
$ |
21,498 |
|
$ |
20,169 |
|
$ |
21,196 |
Operating expenses |
|
|
13,958 |
|
|
11,936 |
|
|
12,769 |
|
|
13,358 |
|
|
11,374 |
|
|
|
11,413 |
|
|
10,972 |
|
|
11,404 |
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
2,030 |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest, and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
7,522 |
|
$ |
7,369 |
|
$ |
7,596 |
|
$ |
7,152 |
|
$ |
7,261 |
|
|
$ |
7,245 |
|
$ |
7,165 |
|
$ |
7,762 |
Income taxes |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
2,484 |
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
152 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
255 |
|
|
163 |
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
5,129 |
|
$ |
5,303 |
|
$ |
5,262 |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
$ |
4,972 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
$ |
4,731 |
|
$ |
5,115 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
342 |
|
|
326 |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,129 |
|
$ |
5,505 |
|
$ |
5,265 |
|
$ |
5,639 |
|
$ |
6,932 |
|
|
$ |
7,143 |
|
$ |
5,073 |
|
$ |
5,441 |
Earnings per share (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
$ |
0.99 |
Net income |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
1.06 |
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
$ |
0.98 |
Net income |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
1.04 |
Common stock price per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
56.41 |
|
$ |
50.23 |
|
$ |
50.37 |
|
$ |
49.29 |
|
$ |
49.64 |
|
|
$ |
46.51 |
|
$ |
47.84 |
|
$ |
49.78 |
Low |
|
|
49.38 |
|
|
46.40 |
|
|
47.41 |
|
|
45.05 |
|
|
44.31 |
|
|
|
43.05 |
|
|
44.59 |
|
|
44.35 |
Close |
|
|
55.70 |
|
|
49.67 |
|
|
48.25 |
|
|
47.23 |
|
|
48.53 |
|
|
|
45.52 |
|
|
46.23 |
|
|
44.94 |
Dividends per share of common stock |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
(1) |
Accounting change in the 2005 fourth quarter represents the adoption of FIN 47. |
(2) |
Due to averaging of shares, quarterly earnings per share may not add up to the totals reported for the full-year. |
165
FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLEMENT (Unaudited)
RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
Net income to average assets |
|
1.28 |
% |
|
1.64 |
% |
|
1.20 |
% |
Return on common stockholders equity (2) |
|
18.8 |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
17.0 |
|
Return on total stockholders equity (3) |
|
18.6 |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
16.8 |
|
Total average equity to average assets |
|
6.88 |
|
|
7.41 |
|
|
7.14 |
|
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of income per diluted common share |
|
45.5 |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
49.1 |
|
(1) |
Reclassified to conform to current periods presentation. |
(2) |
Based on net income less preferred stock dividends as a percentage of average common stockholders equity. |
(3) |
Based on net income less preferred stock dividends as a percentage of average total stockholders equity. |
AVERAGE DEPOSIT LIABILITIES IN OFFICES OUTSIDE THE U.S. (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
In millions of dollars at year end |
|
Average balance |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
Average balance |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
Average balance |
|
Average interest rate |
|
Banks |
|
$ |
50,478 |
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
32,067 |
|
2.99 |
% |
Other demand deposits |
|
|
156,197 |
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
140,105 |
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
121,588 |
|
1.11 |
|
Other time and savings deposits (2) |
|
|
229,376 |
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
203,041 |
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
179,916 |
|
2.43 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
436,051 |
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
372,940 |
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
333,571 |
|
2.00 |
% |
(1) |
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities and also reflect the impact of the local interest rates prevailing in certain countries. See Note 23 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements on page 148. |
(2) |
Primarily consists of certificates of deposit and other time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more. |
MATURITY PROFILE OF TIME DEPOSITS ($100,000 OR MORE) IN U.S. OFFICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars at year end 2006 |
|
Under 3 Months |
|
Over 3 to 6 Months |
|
Over 6 to 12 Months |
|
Over 12 Months |
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
12,136 |
|
$ |
21,190 |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
$ |
3,837 |
Other time deposits |
|
|
945 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
6 |
SHORT-TERM AND OTHER BORROWINGS (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (2) |
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
Other funds borrowed (2) |
|
In millions of dollars |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Amounts outstanding at year end |
|
$ |
349,235 |
|
|
$ |
242,392 |
|
|
$ |
209,555 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,695 |
|
|
$ |
34,159 |
|
|
$ |
25,638 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,138 |
|
|
$ |
32,771 |
|
|
$ |
31,129 |
|
Average outstanding during the year (3) |
|
|
290,663 |
|
|
|
245,595 |
|
|
|
212,132 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,468 |
|
|
|
26,106 |
|
|
|
32,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,047 |
|
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
28,051 |
|
Maximum month-end outstanding |
|
|
349,235 |
|
|
|
279,021 |
|
|
|
240,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
43,695 |
|
|
|
34,751 |
|
|
|
39,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
57,138 |
|
|
|
33,907 |
|
|
|
34,719 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year (3) (4) |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.96 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
4.06 |
% |
|
|
3.53 |
% |
At year end (5) |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
(1) |
Original maturities of less than one year. |
(2) |
Rates reflect prevailing local interest rates including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries. |
(3) |
Excludes discontinued operations. |
(4) |
Interest rates include the effects of risk management activities. See Notes 19 and 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 139 and 148, respectively. |
(5) |
Based on contractual rates at year end. |
166
LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Bank Holding Company/Financial Holding Company
Citigroups ownership of Citibank, N.A. (Citibank) and other banks makes Citigroup a bank holding company under U.S. law. Bank holding
companies are generally limited to the business of banking, managing or controlling banks, and other closely related activities. Because Citigroups subsidiary banks are well capitalized and well managed under U.S.
banking regulations, and have satisfactory ratings under the U.S. Community Reinvestment Act, Citigroup has qualified as a financial holding company, which permits the Company to engage in a broader range of financial activities in the
U.S. and abroad. These activities include underwriting and dealing in securities, insurance underwriting and brokerage, and making investments in non-financial companies for a limited period of time, as long as the Company does not manage the
non-financial companys day-to-day activities, and the Companys banking subsidiaries engage only in permitted cross-marketing with the non-financial company.
If Citigroup ceases to qualify as a financial holding company, it could be barred from new financial activities or acquisitions, and have to discontinue the broader range of activities permitted to financial holding
companies.
Regulators
As a bank holding company, Citigroup is
regulated and supervised by the FRB. Nationally chartered subsidiary banks, such as Citibank, are regulated and supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC); federal savings associations by the Office of Thrift Supervision; and
state-chartered depository institutions by state banking departments and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC has back-up enforcement authority for banking subsidiaries whose deposits it insures. Overseas branches of Citibank
are regulated and supervised by the FRB and OCC and overseas subsidiary banks by the FRB. Such overseas branches and subsidiary banks are also regulated and supervised by regulatory authorities in the host countries.
Internal Growth and Acquisitions
Financial holding companies generally can
engage, directly or indirectly in the U.S. and abroad, in financial activities, either de novo or by acquisition, by providing after-the-fact notice to the FRB. However, the Company must obtain the prior approval of the FRB before acquiring more
than five percent of any class of voting stock of a U.S. depository institution or bank holding company.
Subject to certain restrictions
and the prior approval of the appropriate federal banking regulatory agency, the Company can acquire U.S. depository institutions, including out-of-state banks. In addition, intrastate bank mergers are permitted and banks in states that do not
prohibit out-of-state mergers may merge. A national or state bank can establish a new branch in another state if permitted by the other state, and a federal savings association can generally open new branches in any state.
The FRB must approve certain additional capital contributions to an existing non-U.S. investment and certain acquisitions by the Company of an interest in
a non-U.S. company, including in a foreign bank, as well as the establishment by Citibank of foreign branches.
Dividends
The Companys bank holding companies and banking subsidiaries are limited in their ability to pay dividends. (See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 142.) In addition to specific limitations on the dividends that subsidiary banks can pay to their holding companies, federal regulators could prohibit a dividend that would be an unsafe or unsound banking practice.
It is FRB policy that bank holding companies pay dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year, and only if prospective
earnings retention is consistent with the organizations expected future needs and financial condition. Moreover, bank holding companies should not maintain dividend levels that undermine the companys ability to be a source of strength to
its banking subsidiaries.
Transactions with Nonbank Subsidiaries
A banking subsidiarys transactions with a holding company or nonbank subsidiary generally are limited to 10% of the banking subsidiarys capital stock and surplus, with an aggregate limit of 20% of the banking subsidiarys
capital stock and surplus for all such transactions. Such transactions must be on arms-length terms, and certain credit transactions must be fully secured by approved forms of collateral.
Liquidation
The Companys right to participate in the distribution of
assets of a subsidiary upon the subsidiarys liquidation will be subordinate to the claims of the subsidiarys creditors. If the subsidiary is an insured depository institution, the Companys claim as a stockholder or creditor will be
subordinated to the claims of depositors and other general or subordinated creditors.
In the liquidation of a U.S. insured depository
institution, deposits in U.S. offices and certain claims for administrative expenses and employee compensation will have priority over other general unsecured claims, including deposits in offices outside the U.S., non-deposit claims in all offices,
and claims of a parent such as the Company. The FDIC, which succeeds to the position of insured depositors, would be a priority creditor.
An FDIC-insured financial institution that is affiliated with a failed FDIC-insured institution may have to indemnify the FDIC for losses resulting from the insolvency of the failed institution, even if this causes the indemnifying
institution also to become insolvent. Obligations of a subsidiary depository institution to a parent company are subordinate to the subsidiarys indemnity liability and the claims of its depositors.
167
Other Bank and Bank Holding Company Regulation
The Company and its banking
subsidiaries are subject to other regulatory limitations, including requirements for banks to maintain reserves against deposits; requirements as to risk-based capital and leverage (see Capital Resources and Liquidity on page 86 and Note
20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 142); restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be made and the interest that may be charged; and limitations on investments that can be made and services that can be offered.
The FRB may also expect the Company to commit resources to its subsidiary banks in certain circumstances. However, the FRB may not compel a
bank holding company to remove capital from its regulated securities and insurance subsidiaries for this purpose.
A U.S. bank is not
required to repay a deposit at a branch outside the U.S. if the branch cannot repay the deposit due to an act of war, civil strife, or action taken by the government in the host country.
Privacy and Data Security
Under U.S. federal law, the Company must disclose its privacy policy to consumers, permit consumers
to opt out of having non-public customer information disclosed to third parties, and allow customers to opt out of receiving marketing solicitations based on information about the customer received from another subsidiary. States may
adopt more extensive privacy protections.
The Company is similarly required to have an information security program to safeguard the
confidentiality and security of customer information and to ensure its proper disposal and to notify customers of unauthorized disclosure, consistent with applicable law or regulation.
Non-U.S. Regulation
A substantial portion of the Companys revenues is derived from its operations outside the U.S.,
which are subject to the local laws and regulations of the host country. Those requirements affect how the local activities are organized and the manner in which they are conducted. The Companys foreign activities are thus subject to both U.S.
and foreign legal and regulatory requirements and supervision, including U.S. laws prohibiting companies from doing business in certain countries.
SECURITIES REGULATION
Certain of Citigroups subsidiaries are subject to various securities and commodities regulations
and capital adequacy requirements of the regulatory and exchange authorities of the jurisdictions in which they operate.
Subsidiaries
registrations include as broker-dealer and as investment adviser with the SEC and as futures commission merchant and commodity pool operator with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Subsidiaries memberships include the New York
Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE) and other principal United States securities exchanges, as well as the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) and the National Futures Association (NFA).
Citigroups primary U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI), is registered as a broker-dealer in all 50 states, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Taiwan and Guam. CGMI is also a primary dealer in U.S. Treasury securities and a member of the principal United States futures exchanges. CGMI is subject to extensive regulation, including minimum capital
requirements, which are issued and enforced by, among others, the SEC, the CFTC, the NFA, the NASD, the NYSE, various other self-regulatory organizations of which CGMI is a member and the securities administrators of the 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico and Guam. The SEC and the CFTC also require certain registered broker-dealers (including CGMI) to maintain records concerning certain financial and securities activities of affiliated companies that may be material to the
broker-dealer, and to file certain financial and other information regarding such affiliated companies.
Citigroups securities
operations abroad are conducted through various subsidiaries and affiliates, principally Citigroup Global Markets Limited in London and Nikko Citigroup Limited (a joint venture between CGMHI and Nikko Cordial) in Tokyo. Its securities activities in
the United Kingdom, which include investment banking, trading, and brokerage services, are subject to the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000, which regulates organizations that conduct investment businesses in the United Kingdom including
capital and liquidity requirements and to the rules of the Financial Services Authority. Nikko Citigroup Limited is a registered foreign securities company in Japan and, as such, its activities in Japan are subject to Japanese law applicable to
non-Japanese securities firms and are regulated principally by the Financial Services Agency. These and other subsidiaries of Citigroup are also members of various securities and commodities exchanges and are subject to the rules and regulations of
those exchanges. Citigroups other offices abroad are also subject to the jurisdiction of foreign financial services regulatory authorities.
CGMI is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), which, in the event of the liquidation of a broker-dealer, provides protection for customers securities accounts held by the firm of up to $500,000 for each
eligible customer, subject to a limitation of $100,000 for claims for cash balances. To supplement the SIPC coverage, CGMI has purchased for the benefit of its customers additional protection, subject to an aggregate loss limit of $600 million and a
per client cash loss limit of up to $1.9 million.
Unresolved SEC Staff Comments
The Company is in discussion with the SEC regarding the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows classification of loan securitizations.
168
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
As a registered broker-dealer, CGMI is subject to the SECs Net Capital Rule. CGMI computes net
capital under the alternative method of the Net Capital Rule, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital equal to 2% of aggregate debit items (as defined). A member of the NYSE may be required to reduce its business if its net capital is
less than 4% of aggregate debit balances (as defined) and may also be prohibited from expanding its business or paying cash dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5% of aggregate debit balances. Furthermore, the Net Capital Rule does
not permit withdrawal of equity or subordinated capital if the resulting net capital would be less than 5% of such aggregate debit balances.
The Net Capital Rule also limits the ability of broker-dealers to transfer large amounts of capital to parent companies and other affiliates. Under the Net Capital Rule, equity capital cannot be withdrawn from a broker-dealer without the
prior approval of that broker-dealers designated examining authority (in the case of CGMI, the NYSE) in certain circumstances, including when net capital after the withdrawal would be less than (i) 120% of the minimum net capital required
by the Net Capital Rule, or (ii) 25% of the broker-dealers securities position haircuts. Haircuts is the term used for deductions from capital of certain specified percentages of the market value of securities to
reflect the possibility of a market decline prior to disposition. In addition, the Net Capital Rule requires broker-dealers to notify the SEC and the appropriate self-regulatory organization two business days before any withdrawals of excess net
capital if the withdrawals (in the aggregate over any 30-day period) would exceed the greater of $500,000 or 30% of the broker-dealers excess net capital, and two business days after any withdrawals (in the aggregate over any 30-day period)
that exceeds the greater of $500,000 or 20% of excess net capital. The Net Capital Rule also authorizes the SEC to order a freeze (for up to 20 business days) on the transfer of capital if a broker-dealer plans a withdrawal of more than 30% of its
excess net capital (when aggregated with all other withdrawals during the previous 30 days) and the SEC believes that such a withdrawal may be detrimental to the financial integrity of the broker-dealer or may jeopardize the broker-dealers
ability to pay its customers.
GENERAL BUSINESS FACTORS
In the Companys judgment, no material part of the Companys business depends upon a
single customer or group of customers, the loss of which would have a materially adverse effect on the Company, and no one customer or group of affiliated customers accounts for as much as 10% of the Companys consolidated revenues.
PROPERTIES
Citigroups principal executive offices are located at 399 Park Avenue in New York City. Citigroup, and
certain of its subsidiaries, is the largest tenant of this building. The Company also has office space in Citigroup Center (153 E. 53rd St. in New York City) under a long-term lease. Citibank leases a building in Long Island City, New York, and has
a long-term lease on a building at 111 Wall Street in New York City, which are totally occupied by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries.
CGMHI owns its principal offices in a building at 388 Greenwich Street in New York City, and also owns the neighboring building at 390 Greenwich Street, both of which are fully occupied by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries.
Banamex has its principal offices in Mexico City in facilities that are part owned and part leased by it. Banamex has office and branch
sites throughout Mexico, most of which it owns.
The Company owns other offices and certain warehouse space, none of which is material to
the Companys financial condition or operations.
The Company believes its properties are adequate and suitable for its business as
presently conducted and are adequately maintained. For further information concerning leases, see Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 151.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Enron Corp.
Beginning in 2002, Citigroup, CGMI and certain executive officers and current and former employees (along with, in many cases, other investment banks and certain Enron officers and directors, lawyers and/or accountants) were named as
defendants in a series of individual and putative class action lawsuits related to Enron. The putative securities class action and all remaining individual actions (other than actions brought as part of Enrons Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding)
were consolidated or coordinated in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The consolidated securities class action, brought on behalf of a putative class of individuals who purchased Enron securities (NEWBY, et al. v.
ENRON CORP., et al.), alleged violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Citigroup agreed to settle this action on June 10, 2005. Under
the terms of the settlement, approved by the District Court on May 24, 2006, Citigroup will make a pretax payment of $2.01 billion to the settlement class, which consists of all purchasers of publicly traded equity and debt securities
issued by Enron and Enron-related entities between September 9, 1997 and December 2, 2001. In light of this settlement, plaintiffs in three individual securities actions, which are part of the NEWBY class, have agreed to dismiss their
lawsuits against Citigroup: CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC, et al.; HEADWATERS CAPITAL LLC v. LAY, et al.; and VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INS. CO. v. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP., et al.
Plaintiffs in two other cases, not part of the NEWBY class, have also voluntarily dismissed their claims against Citigroup: STEINER v. ENRON CORP., et al. and TOWN OF NEW HARTFORD v. LAY, et al.
169
A number of other individual actions have been settled and/or dismissed. On October 26, 2006, Citigroup, along with certain other investment bank
defendants, agreed to settle an action brought by four Ohio state pension funds that purchased Enron securities, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, et al. v. FASTOW, et al. In December 2006, Citigroup agreed to settle three actions brought
by various investment funds and insurance companies that purchased Enron securities: AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.; WESTBORO PROPERTIES, LLC, et al. v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.; and RAVENSWOOD I, L.L.C., et al.
v. CITIGROUP INC., et al. On December 15, 2006, the District Court dismissed with prejudice 10 cases brought by clients of a single law firm in connection with the purchase and holding of Enron securities (also dismissing third-party claims
against Citigroup): ADAMS, et al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; AHLICH, et al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; BULLOCK, et al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; CHOUCROUN, et al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; DELGADO, et al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; GUY, et
al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; JOSE, et al. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, et al.; ODAM, et al. v. ENRON CORP., et al.; PEARSON, et al. v. FASTOW, et al.; and ROSEN, et al. v. FASTOW, et al. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal in each of the ten cases on
January 5, 2007.
Additional actions against Citigroup and its affiliates were filed beginning in 2002 in the Southern District of
Texas and other various jurisdictions. Certain of these remain pending, including: (i) actions brought by investors in Enron securities; (ii) actions brought by commercial banks that participated in Enron revolving credit facilities and/or
purchasers of Enron bank debt in the secondary market; (iii) actions filed by Enron in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings seeking to recover payments to Citigroup as alleged preferences or fraudulent conveyances, to disallow or equitably
subordinate claims of Citigroup and Citigroup transferees on the basis of alleged fraud, and to recover damages from Citigroup for allegedly aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; (iv) actions brought by the Attorney General of
Connecticut in connection with an Enron-related transaction; (v) an action brought by certain trusts that issued securities linked to Enrons credit, by the related indenture trustee and certain holders of those securities; (vi) an
action brought by a utility, alleging that Citigroup and others aided Enron in fraudulently overcharging for electricity; and (vii) actions by a bank that entered into credit derivative swap transactions with Citibank.
Research
WorldCom, Inc. Beginning in 2002, Citigroup, CGMI and certain executive officers and current and former employees (along
with, in many cases, other investment banks, certain WorldCom officers and directors, and/or accountants) were named as defendants in a series of individual and putative class action lawsuits relating to the underwriting of WorldCom securities and
the issuance of research analyst reports concerning WorldCom. The putative class action and the majority of the individual actions were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as In re WORLDCOM, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION; certain individual actions remained pending in other state and federal courts. Citigroup settled the consolidated putative class action in May 2004. Citigroup has now settled all but four of the WorldCom-related individual
actions. One of the four remaining actions, HOLMES, et al. v. GRUBMAN, et al., was dismissed by the District Court; an appeal is pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Telecommunications Research Class Actions. Beginning in 2002, Citigroup, CGMI and certain executive officers and current and former employees were
named as defendants in a series of putative class action lawsuits, alleging violations of the federal securities laws, including Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with Citigroup research analyst
reports concerning seven issuers: AT&T Corp. (AT&T), Winstar Communications, Inc. (Winstar), Level 3 Communications, Inc. (Level 3), Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (MFN), XO
Communications, Inc. (XO), Williams Communications Group Inc. (Williams), and Focal Communications, Inc. (Focal). These putative class actions were assigned to a single judge in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated proceedings. The court consolidated these actions into seven separate proceedings corresponding to the seven issuers of securities involved.
Citigroup has settled five of the seven actions. On August 17, 2006, the court approved Citigroups settlement of the AT&T action, In re
SALOMON ANALYST AT&T LITIGATION. On September 29, 2006, the court approved Citigroups settlements of the Level 3, XO and Williams actions, In re SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION, In re SALOMON ANALYST XO LITIGATION, and In re
SALOMON ANALYST WILLIAMS LITIGATION, respectively. On November 14, 2006, the court preliminarily approved Citigroups settlement of the Focal action, LOS ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION v. CITIGROUP. A hearing on the final
approval of the Focal settlement is scheduled for March 23, 2007.
The Winstar action, In re SALOMON ANALYST WINSTAR LITIGATION, was
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety on January 6, 2005. The MFN action, In re SALOMON ANALYST METROMEDIA LITIGATION, remains pending. On January 6, 2005, the District Court granted in part and denied in part Citigroups motion to
dismiss the claims against it. On June 20, 2006, the District Court certified the plaintiff class in the MFN action. The District Courts class certification decision is on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit.
170
Global Crossing, Ltd. In January 2004, the Global Crossing Estate Representative filed an adversary action in the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York against Citigroup and several other banks seeking to rescind the payment of a loan made to a Global Crossing subsidiary. Citigroup moved to dismiss the action in May 2004, and the motion remains pending.
Qwest-related Actions. Beginning in 2003, Citigroup and CGMI (along with, in many cases, other investment banks, certain Qwest
officers and directors and accountants) were named as defendants in a series of actions alleging violations of state and federal securities laws in connection with the underwriting of, and research analyst reports concerning, Qwest Communications
International Inc. (Qwest). Citigroup either settled or obtained dismissal of several such cases. In October 2006, Citigroup settled the two remaining Qwest-related actions: CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. QWEST
COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., and STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS v. QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., et al.
Customer Class Actions. On May 18, 2006, the District Court gave final approval to the settlement in NORMAN v. SALOMON SMITH BARNEY, a putative class action asserting violations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and various
common law claims in connection with certain customers who maintained guided portfolio management accounts at Smith Barney.
In March 2004,
a putative research-related customer class action alleging various state law claims arising out of the issuance of allegedly misleading research analyst reports, DISHER v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., was filed in Illinois state court. Citigroup
removed this action to federal court, and in August 2005 the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the District Courts August 2004 order remanding the case to state court, and directed the District Court to dismiss
plaintiffs claims as pre-empted. On June 26, 2006, the United States Supreme Court granted plaintiffs petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the Seventh Circuits opinion and remanded the case to the Seventh Circuit for
further proceedings. On January 22, 2007, the Seventh Circuit dismissed Citigroups appeal from the District Courts removal order for lack of appellate jurisdiction. On February 1, 2007, plaintiffs secured an order reopening
this case in Illinois state court, and on February 16, Citigroup removed the reopened action to federal court.
Arbitrations. In
addition to the various lawsuits discussed above, similar claims against Citigroup and certain of its affiliates relating to research analyst reports concerning the securities mentioned above, and other securities, are pending in numerous
arbitrations around the country.
Parmalat
Beginning in 2004, Citigroup and Citibank, N.A. (along with, in many
cases, other investment banks and certain Parmalat officers and/or accountants) were named as defendants in a series of class action complaints filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York relating to the collapse
of Parmalat Finanziaria S.P.A. (Parmalat) and consolidated under the caption In re PARMALAT SECURITIES LITIGATION. The consolidated amended complaint, filed on October 18, 2004, alleges violations of Sections 10 and 20 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Parmalat securities between January 5, 1999 and December 18, 2003. On January 10, 2005, the Citigroup defendants
filed a motion to dismiss the action, which the District Court granted in part and denied in part on July 13, 2005. Plaintiffs filed a second amended consolidated complaint on August 25, 2005. On September 21, 2006, plaintiffs filed a
motion for class certification, which is currently pending. On October 10, 2006, defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the claims of all foreign purchasers for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; that motion is also still
pending.
On July 29, 2004, Enrico Bondi, as extraordinary commissioner of Parmalat and other affiliated entities (Bondi),
filed a lawsuit in New Jersey Superior Court against Citigroup, Citibank, N.A. and certain allegedly controlled Citigroup entities, alleging that the Citigroup defendants participated in fraud committed by the officers and directors of Parmalat and
seeking unspecified damages. The action alleges a variety of claims under New Jersey state law, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, violations of the New Jersey Fraudulent Transfer Act and violations of the New Jersey RICO statute. The
Citigroup defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action, which was granted in part and denied in part. The Citigroup defendants answered the complaint and filed counterclaims alleging causes of action for fraud, negligent misrepresentation,
conversion and breach of warranty. Bondis motion to dismiss the counterclaims was denied. On July 14, 2006, the New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed the denial of Citigroups motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 19,
2006, the New Jersey Supreme Court denied Citigroups motion for leave to appeal from the Appellate Divisions decision. On December 18, 2006, Citigroup made a renewed motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens, which was
denied on January 22, 2007.
Citigroup (along with, among others, numerous other investment banks, certain former Parmalat officers and
accountants) also is involved in various Parmalat-related proceedings in Italy. In one such action, the Milan prosecutor has initiated proceedings seeking the indictment of numerous individuals, including a Citigroup employee, for offenses under
Italian law that arise out of the collapse of Parmalat. In connection with this proceeding, the Milan prosecutor may also seek administrative remedies. In addition, a number of private parties, including former investors in Parmalat securities, have
applied to join the Milan proceedings as civil claimants and are seeking unspecified civil damages against numerous parties, including Citigroup. In Parma, a public prosecutor is conducting a criminal investigation into alleged bankruptcy offenses
relating to the collapse of Parmalat. That investigation is ongoing.
171
Adelphia Communications Corporation
On July 6, 2003, an adversary
proceeding was filed by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors on behalf of Adelphia Communications Corporation against certain lenders and investment banks, including CGMI, Citibank, N.A., Citicorp USA, Inc., and Citigroup Financial
Products, Inc. (together, the Citigroup Parties). The complaint alleges that the Citigroup Parties and numerous other defendants committed acts in violation of the Bank Holding Company Act and common law. The complaints seek
equitable relief and an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. In November 2003, a similar adversary proceeding was filed by the Equity Holders Committee of Adelphia. In June 2004, motions to dismiss were filed with
respect to the complaints of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the Equity Holders Committee. The motions are currently pending.
In addition, CGMI is among the underwriters named in numerous civil actions brought to date by investors in Adelphia debt securities in connection with Adelphia securities offerings between September 1997 and October 2001. Three
of the complaints also assert claims against Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A. All of the complaints allege violations of federal securities laws, and certain of the complaints also allege violations of state securities laws and the common law.
The complaint seeks unspecified damages. In December 2003, a second amended complaint was filed and consolidated before the same judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In February 2004, motions to
dismiss the class and individual actions pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York were filed. In May and July of 2005, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted motions to
dismiss several claims, based on the running of applicable statute of limitations, asserted in the putative class and individual actions being coordinated under IN RE ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. With the
exception of one individual action that was dismissed with prejudice, the court granted the putative class and individual plaintiffs leave to re-plead certain of those claims the court found to be time-barred. Without admitting any liability, CGMI
and numerous other financial institution defendants settled IN RE ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION for a total of $250 million, and the settlement was approved in November 2006. Two of the additional remaining
individual complaints have been settled.
Allied Irish Bank
On
January 31, 2006, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York partially denied motions filed by Citibank and a co-defendant to dismiss a complaint filed by Allied Irish Bank, P.L.C. (AIB) in May 2003,
seeking compensatory and punitive damages in connection with losses sustained by a subsidiary of AIB in 20002002. The complaint alleges that defendants are liable for fraudulent and fictitious foreign currency trades entered by one of
AIBs traders through defendants, who provided prime brokerage services. The courts ruling on the motions to dismiss allowed plaintiffs common law claims, including fraudulent concealment and aiding and abetting fraud, to proceed.
Mutual Funds
Citigroup and certain of its affiliates have been named in several
class action litigations pending in various federal District Courts arising out of alleged violations of the federal securities laws, including the Investment Company Act, and common law (including breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment).
The claims concern practices in connection with the sale of mutual funds, including allegations involving market timing, revenue sharing, incentive payments for the sale of proprietary funds, undisclosed breakpoint discounts for the sale of certain
classes of funds, inappropriate share class recommendations and inappropriate fund investments. The litigations involving market timing have been consolidated under the Multi District rules in the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland (the MDL action), and the litigations involving revenue sharing, incentive payment and other issues are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs in these litigations
generally seek unspecified compensatory damages, recessionary damages, injunctive relief, costs and fees. In the principal cases concerning revenue sharing, incentive payment and other issues, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated and amended
complaint on December 15, 2004. Citigroup defendants motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint was substantially granted; a motion to dismiss the remaining claim has been filed. Several derivative actions and class actions were also
dismissed against Citigroup defendants in the MDL action (the class actions were dismissed with leave to replead state law claims of unjust enrichment).
Issues in the mutual-fund industry continue to receive scrutiny by various government regulators and SROs. CGMI reached an agreement in principle with the NYSE to settle a matter related to its market-timing practices
prior to September 2003.
IPO Securities Litigation
In
April 2002, consolidated amended complaints were filed against CGMI and other investment banks named in numerous putative class actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of
certain federal securities laws (including Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) with respect to the allocation of shares for certain initial public
offerings and related aftermarket transactions and damage to investors caused by allegedly biased research analyst reports. Defendants motion to dismiss was denied. On October 13, 2004, the court granted in part the motion to certify
class actions for six focus cases in the securities litigation. CGMI is not a defendant in any of the six focus cases. In December 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the District Court and held that the matter
could not proceed as a class action. The plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing in January 2007.
172
IPO Antitrust Litigation
Beginning in March 2001, several putative class
actions that were later consolidated into a single class action were filed in the Southern District of New York against CGMI and other investment banks, alleging violations of certain federal and state antitrust laws in connection with the
allocation of shares in initial public offerings when acting as underwriters. A separate putative class action was filed against the same underwriter defendants as well as certain institutional investors alleging commercial bribery claims under the
Robinson Patman Act arising out of similar allegations regarding IPO allocation conduct. On November 3, 2003, the District Court granted CGMIs motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint in the antitrust case and the Robinson
Patman complaint. Plaintiffs thereafter appealed the District Courts order dismissing the two actions. On September 28, 2005, the Second Circuit vacated the District Courts decision and ordered the cases remanded to the District
Court. In December 2006, the United States Supreme Court granted the underwriter defendants petition for certiorari to review the Second Circuits decision and set oral argument for March 2007.
Wage & Hour Employment Actions
Numerous financial services firms,
including Citigroup and its affiliates, have been named in putative class actions alleging that certain present and former employees in California were entitled to overtime pay under state and federal laws; were subject to certain allegedly unlawful
deductions under state law; or were entitled to reimbursement for employment-related expenses incurred by them. The first of these class actions filed in the Fall of 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,
BAHRAMIPOUR v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., seeks damages and injunctive relief on behalf of a putative class of California employees. Similar complaints have been subsequently filed against CGMI on behalf of certain statewide or nationwide
putative class in (i) the United States District Courts for the Southern District of New York, the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of New York, the District of Massachusetts, and the Middle District of Pennsylvania; and
(ii) the New Jersey Superior Court. Without admitting any liability, CGMI has reached an agreement in principle, which is subject to court approval, to a nationwide settlement for up to approximately $98 million of various class actions
asserting violations of state and federal laws relating to overtime and violations of various state laws relating to alleged unlawful payroll deductions.
Other
The Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting a non-public investigation into the Companys treatment of certain potential Argentina- related losses in the
2001 fourth quarter and the treatment of certain specific tax reserves and releases during the period 2000 to 2004 related to the Associates businesses acquired in the 2000 fourth quarter. In connection with these matters, the SEC has subpoenaed
witness testimony and certain accounting and internal controls-related information for the years 1997 to 2004. The Company is cooperating with the SEC in its investigation. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the investigation.
Beginning in June 2005, certain participants in the Citigroup Pension Plan (the Plan) filed putative class action complaints against the Plan
and other Citigroup defendants, alleging that certain aspects of the Plan violate provisions of ERISA. The claims were later consolidated as IN RE: CITIGROUP PENSION PLAN ERISA LITIGATION in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York. In December 2006, the District Court denied defendants summary judgment motion; granted summary judgment to plaintiffs on their backloading, age discrimination and notice claims; and ordered the Plan reformed to comply with ERISA.
The District Court also granted plaintiffs motion for class certification. On January 23, 2007, defendants moved the District Court for entry of a partial, appealable final judgment with respect to the backloading and age discrimination
rulings, permission to file an interlocutory appeal from the summary judgment order, and for a stay pending proceedings in the Second Circuit.
In 2002, a shareholder derivative action CARROLL v. WEILL, et al., was filed in New York state court alleging claims against Citigroup directors in connection with Citigroups activities with Enron and other matters. The court
dismissed the complaint in October 2002, the Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal in December 2003, and in May 2004, the New York Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs motion for leave to appeal that affirmance. Since that date, Citigroup
has received a shareholder demand containing allegations similar to those set forth in the CARROLL action, and a supplemental letter containing various additional allegations relating to other activities of Citigroup. In February 2006, the
parties reached an agreement in principle to settle this dispute, and a fairness hearing is scheduled for February 28, 2007.
Settlement Payments
Payments required in settlement agreements described above have been made or are covered by existing litigation reserves.
********
Additional lawsuits containing
claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future.
173
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Share Repurchases
Under its long-standing repurchase program (which was expanded in the 2006 second quarter as noted below), the Company buys back common shares in the market or otherwise
from time to time.
The following table summarizes the Companys share repurchases during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share amounts |
|
Total shares repurchased |
|
Average price paid per share |
|
Dollar value of remaining authorized repurchase program |
First quarter 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases (1) |
|
42.9 |
|
$ |
46.58 |
|
$ |
2,412 |
Employee transactions (2) |
|
8.7 |
|
|
46.40 |
|
|
N/A |
Total first quarter 2006 |
|
51.6 |
|
$ |
46.55 |
|
$ |
2,412 |
Second quarter 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
40.8 |
|
$ |
48.98 |
|
$ |
10,412 |
Employee transactions |
|
2.8 |
|
|
49.71 |
|
|
N/A |
Total second quarter 2006 |
|
43.6 |
|
$ |
49.02 |
|
$ |
10,412 |
Third quarter 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
40.9 |
|
$ |
48.90 |
|
$ |
8,412 |
Employee transactions |
|
1.5 |
|
|
48.75 |
|
|
N/A |
Total third quarter 2006 |
|
42.4 |
|
$ |
48.89 |
|
$ |
8,412 |
October 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
7.2 |
|
$ |
50.41 |
|
$ |
8,049 |
Employee transactions |
|
4.4 |
|
|
50.98 |
|
|
N/A |
November 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
5.7 |
|
$ |
50.16 |
|
$ |
7,764 |
Employee transactions |
|
0.5 |
|
|
50.45 |
|
|
N/A |
December 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
6.5 |
|
$ |
54.34 |
|
$ |
7,412 |
Employee transactions |
|
7.4 |
|
|
54.52 |
|
|
N/A |
Fourth quarter 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
19.4 |
|
$ |
51.66 |
|
$ |
7,412 |
Employee transactions |
|
12.3 |
|
|
53.09 |
|
|
N/A |
Total fourth quarter 2006 |
|
31.7 |
|
$ |
52.21 |
|
$ |
7,412 |
Year-to-date 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open market repurchases |
|
144.0 |
|
$ |
48.60 |
|
$ |
7,412 |
Employee transactions |
|
25.3 |
|
|
50.15 |
|
|
N/A |
Total year-to-date 2006 |
|
169.3 |
|
$ |
48.83 |
|
$ |
7,412 |
(1) |
All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. On April 17, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10 billion in
share repurchases. |
(2) |
Consists of shares added to treasury stock related to activity on employee stock option program exercises, where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or under
the Companys employee restricted or deferred stock program, where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements. |
174
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Plan Category |
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for future
issuance under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
253,085,543 |
(1) |
|
$ |
41.53 |
(2) |
|
315,900,909 |
(3) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
14,186,619 |
(4) |
|
$ |
47.37 |
(5) |
|
0 |
(6) |
Total |
|
267,272,162 |
|
|
$ |
41.87 |
|
|
315,900,909 |
|
(1) |
Includes 59.22 million shares issuable upon the vesting of deferred stock awards. Does not include an aggregate of 6.01 million shares subject to outstanding options granted by
predecessor companies under plans assumed by Citigroup in connection with mergers and acquisitions. Citigroup has not made any awards under these plans, and they are not considered as a source of shares for future awards. The weighted-average
exercise price of such options is $43.94 per share. Some of the assumed options also entitled the holders to receive Litigation Tracking Warrants (LTWs) upon exercise, in addition to the shares underlying the options. The LTWs were issued in 1998 to
holders of the outstanding common stock of Golden State Bancorp Inc. (GSB), and assumed by Citigroup upon the acquisition of GSB in 2002. In 2005, following resolution of certain litigation against the U.S. government by Glendale Federal Bank, FSB,
the LTWs became exercisable for a 60-day period entitling the holders to receive upon exercise 0.02302 share of Citigroup common stock and $0.6725 net cash payment after deducting the $0.0002 exercise price per LTW. Holders of unexercised GSB
options who would have received LTWs had their options been exercised before the start of the LTW exercise period are entitled to receive the LTW consideration whenever the underlying GSB options are exercised. This could result in the issuance of
less than 1,000 additional shares of Citigroup common stock if all the LTW options that remain outstanding are exercised in full. |
(2) |
As described in footnote 1 above, does not include 6.01 million shares subject to outstanding options under certain plans assumed by Citigroup in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, and 59.22 million shares subject to deferred stock awards. |
(3) |
Does not include shares that were available for issuance under plans approved by shareholders of acquired companies but under which Citigroup does not make any awards. Of the number of shares
available for future issuance, 249.50 million of such shares are available under plans that provide for awards of restricted stock, in addition to (or in lieu of) options, warrants and rights. |
(4) |
Includes 2.14 million shares issuable upon the vesting of deferred stock awards. Does not include 287,018 shares subject to outstanding options under a plan assumed by Citigroup in a
merger. Citigroup has not made any awards under this plan, and it is not considered as a source of shares for future awards by Citigroup. The weighted-average exercise price of such options is $46.33 per share. |
(5) |
As described in footnote 4 above, does not include 287,018 shares subject to outstanding options under a plan assumed by Citigroup in a merger, and 2.14 million shares subject to
deferred stock awards. |
(6) |
Does not include plans of acquired companies under which Citigroup does not make any awards. Also does not include up to 4.59 million shares available for purchase pursuant to the
Travelers Group Stock Purchase Plan for PFS Representatives. This plan allows eligible Primerica Financial Services (PFS) representatives to use their earned commissions to periodically purchase shares of Citigroup common stock at current market
prices. A limited number of high performers may purchase shares, subject to plan limits, at discounts of up to 25%. The discount is funded by Primerica Financial Services and is considered additional compensation. Shares are purchased on the open
market; no newly issued or treasury shares are used in this program. |
Most of Citigroups
outstanding equity awards were granted under three stockholder approved plansthe Citigroup 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan); the Travelers Group Capital Accumulation Plan; and the 1997 Citicorp Stock Incentive Plan. There were no
offerings under the Citigroup 2000 Stock Purchase Plan since the final purchase date under the last offering under this plan in 2005. A small percentage of equity awards have been granted under several plans that have not been approved by
stockholders, primarily the Citigroup Employee Incentive Plan. Generally, awards are made to employees participating in Citigroups stock option, stock award or stock purchase programs.
All of the plans are administered by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Citigroup Board of Directors (the Committee), which is comprised
entirely of non-employee independent directors. Persons eligible to participate in Citigroups equity plans are selected by management from time to time subject to the Committees approval.
Effective April 19, 2005, stockholders approved amendments to the 1999 Plan, and the other plans mentioned above (with the exception of the 2000
Stock Purchase Plan) were terminated as a source of shares for future awards.
The following disclosure is provided with respect to plans
that have not been submitted to stockholders for approval, and which remain active only with respect to previously granted awards. Additional information regarding Citigroups equity compensation programs can be found in Note 8 to the Company
Consolidated Financial Statements on page 122.
Non-Stockholder Approved Plans
The Citigroup Employee Incentive Plan, originally adopted by the Board of Directors in 1991, was amended by the Board of Directors on April 17, 2001. This plan was used to grant stock options and restricted or
deferred stock awards to participants in the Citigroup Capital Accumulation Program (CAP) and to new hires. Executive officers and directors of the Company were not eligible to participate in this plan. CAP is an incentive and retention
award program pursuant to which a specified portion of a participants incentive compensation (or commissions) is delivered in the form of a restricted
or deferred stock award, or in some cases, restricted or deferred stock and stock options. Vesting periods for restricted and deferred stock awards under this plan, including awards pursuant to CAP, were generally from three to five years. Stock
options awarded under this plan, including CAP options, are non-qualified stock options. Options granted prior to January 1, 2003 have 10-year terms and vest at a rate of 20% per year, with the first vesting date generally occurring 12 to
18 months following the grant date. Options granted on or after January 1, 2003, but prior to January 1, 2005, generally have six-year terms and vest at a rate of one-third per year, with the first vesting date generally occurring 12 to 18
months following the grant date. Options granted under this plan in 2005 generally have six-year terms and vest at a rate of 25% per year. Generally, the terms of restricted and deferred stock awards and options granted under the Citigroup
Employee Incentive Plan provide that the awards will be canceled if an employee leaves the Company, except in cases of disability or death, or after satisfying certain age and years of service requirements.
Additionally, since December 2001, deferred stock awards that used to be made under certain deferred compensation plans administered by Citigroup Global
Markets Holdings Inc. were made under the Citigroup Employee Incentive Plan. These plans provide for deferred stock awards to employees who meet certain specified performance targets. Generally, the awards vest in five years. Awards are canceled if
an employee voluntarily leaves the Company prior to vesting. Effective April 19, 2005, all equity awards provided for by these deferred compensation plans are being granted under the 1999 Plan. Deferred stock awards granted under the Salomon
Smith Barney Inc. Branch Managers Asset Deferred Bonus Plan, the Salomon Smith Barney Inc. Asset Gathering Bonus Plan, the Salomon Smith Barney Inc. Directors Council Milestone Bonus Plan and the Salomon Smith Barney Inc. Stock Bonus Plan for
FC Associates prior to December 2001 remain outstanding.
175
The Travelers Group Capital Accumulation Plan for PFS Representatives (PFS CAP) and similar plans were adopted by Citigroup at various times. These plans
provided for CAP awards and other restricted stock awards to agents of certain subsidiaries or affiliates of Citigroup. Awards are no longer being granted from these plans, and of awards previously granted from these plans, only awards from PFS CAP
remain outstanding. Beginning in July 2002, awards that used to be granted pursuant to PFS CAP were made under the Employee Incentive Plan; these awards are now being made under the 1999 Plan.
In connection with the acquisition of Associates in 2001, Citigroup assumed options granted to former Associates directors pursuant to the Associates
First Capital Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Upon the acquisition, the options vested and were converted to options to purchase Citigroup common stock, and the plan was terminated. All options that remain
outstanding under the plan will expire by no later than January 2010.
The Citigroup 2000 International Stock Purchase Plan was adopted in
2000 to allow employees outside the United States to participate in Citigroups stock purchase programs. The terms of the international plan are identical to the terms of the stockholder-approved Citigroup 2000 Stock Purchase Plan, except that
it is not intended to be qualified under Section 423 of the United States Internal Revenue Code. The number of shares available for issuance under both plans may not exceed the number authorized for issuance under the stockholder-approved plan.
Executive Officers
Citigroups Executive Officers on February 23,
2007 are:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position and Office Held |
Ajay Banga |
|
47 |
|
Chairman & CEO, Global Consumer Group International |
Sir Winfried F.W. Bischoff |
|
65 |
|
Chairman, Citigroup Europe |
David C. Bushnell |
|
52 |
|
Senior Risk Officer |
Robert Druskin |
|
59 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
Steven J. Freiberg |
|
49 |
|
Chairman & CEO, Global Consumer Group North America |
John C. Gerspach |
|
53 |
|
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
Michael S. Helfer |
|
61 |
|
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Lewis B. Kaden |
|
64 |
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer |
Michael Klein |
|
43 |
|
Co-President, Corporate and Investment Banking |
Sallie L. Krawcheck |
|
42 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Thomas G. Maheras |
|
44 |
|
Co-President, Corporate and Investment Banking |
Manuel Medina-Mora |
|
56 |
|
Chairman & CEO, Latin America & Mexico; CEO, Banamex |
Charles Prince |
|
57 |
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
William R. Rhodes |
|
71 |
|
Senior Vice Chairman; Chairman, President & CEO, Citibank, N.A. |
Robert E. Rubin |
|
68 |
|
Chairman of the Executive Committee |
Stephen R. Volk |
|
70 |
|
Vice Chairman |
Each executive officer has held executive or management positions with the Company for at least five years, except
that:
|
|
Mr. Helfer joined Citigroup in February 2003. From 2002 to 2003, he was President, Strategic Investments of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and from 2000
to 2003 he was Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. |
|
|
Mr. Kaden joined Citigroup in September 2005. Prior to joining Citigroup, Mr. Kaden was a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell.
|
|
|
Ms. Krawcheck joined Citigroup in 2002, serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Smith Barney until November 2004. Prior to 2002,
Ms. Krawcheck was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC and an Executive Vice President of Bernsteins parent company, Alliance Capital Management, L.P. from 2001. |
|
|
Mr. Volk joined Citigroup in July 2004. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Volk was Chairman of Credit Suisse First Boston. Before that, Mr. Volk was a partner
at Shearman & Sterling. |
176
10-K CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX
This Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates the
requirements of the accounting profession and the Securities and Exchange Commission, including a comprehensive explanation of 2006 results.
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item Number |
|
Page |
|
|
Part I |
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Business |
|
2, 4 95, 120-121, 167176 |
|
|
|
1A. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
58 |
|
|
|
1B. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments |
|
168 |
|
|
|
2. |
|
Properties |
|
169 |
|
|
|
3. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
169173 |
|
|
|
4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
Part II |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
87, 165, 174, |
|
|
|
|
178179 |
|
|
|
6. |
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
3 |
|
|
|
7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
495 |
|
|
|
7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
121122, |
|
|
|
|
132141, 143147 |
|
|
|
8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
|
104166 |
|
|
|
9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
|
9A. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
96, 100 |
|
|
|
9B. |
|
Other Information |
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part III |
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
|
176, 178, 180 * |
|
|
|
11. |
|
Executive Compensation |
|
** |
|
|
|
12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
175176 *** |
|
|
|
13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
**** |
|
|
|
14. |
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
|
***** |
|
|
Part IV |
|
|
|
|
|
15. |
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
|
178 |
* |
|
For additional information regarding Citigroup Directors, see the material under the captions Corporate Governance, Proposal 1: Election of Directors and Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the definitive Proxy Statement for Citigroups Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 17, 2007, to be filed with the SEC (the Proxy Statement), incorporated herein by
reference. |
** |
|
See the material under the captions The Personnel and Compensation Committee Report, Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Executive Compensation in the
Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference. |
*** |
|
See the material under the captions About the Annual Meeting and Stock Ownership in the Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference. |
**** |
|
See the material under the captions Corporate GovernanceDirector Independence, Proposal 1: Election of Directors, Executive Compensation and
Certain Transactions and Relationships, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in the Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference. |
***** |
|
See the material under the caption Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
None of the foregoing incorporation by reference shall include the information referred to in Item 402(a)(8) of Regulation S-K. |
177
CORPORATE INFORMATION
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following exhibits are either filed herewith or have been previously filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are filed herewith by incorporation by reference:
|
|
Citigroups Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, |
|
|
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, including Indentures, |
|
|
Material Contracts, including certain compensatory plans available only to officers and/or directors, |
|
|
Statements re: Computation of Ratios, |
|
|
Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant, |
|
|
Powers of Attorney of Directors Armstrong, Belda, David, Derr, Deutch, Hernandez Ramirez, Jordan, Kleinfeld, Liveris, Mecum, Mulcahy, Parsons, Rodin, Rubin, and
Thomas. |
|
|
CEO and CFO certifications under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
A more detailed exhibit index has been filed with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain copies of that index, or any of the documents in that index, by writing
to Citigroup Inc., Corporate Governance, 425 Park Avenue, 2nd floor, New York, New York 10043, or on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.
Financial
Statements filed for Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries:
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Citibank, N.A.) |
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
Annual Report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Commission File Number
1-9924
Citigroup Inc.
Incorporated in the State of Delaware
IRS Employer Identification Number: 52-1568099
Address: 399
Park Avenue
New York, New York 10043
Telephone: 212 559 1000
Stockholder Information
Citigroup common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol C.
Citigroup Preferred Stock Series F, G, H, and M are also listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Because our common stock is listed on the NYSE, our chief executive officer is required to make, and he has made, an annual certification to the NYSE
stating that he was not aware of any violation by Citigroup of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. Our chief executive officer made his annual certification to that effect to the NYSE as of May 4, 2006.
Transfer Agent
Stockholder address changes and inquiries regarding stock transfers, dividend replacement, 1099-DIV reporting, and lost
securities for common and preferred stocks should be directed to:
Citibank Stockholder Services
P.O. Box 43077
Providence, RI 02940-3077
Telephone No. 781 575 4555
Toll-free No. 888 250 3985
Facsimile No. 201 324 3284
E-mail address: Citibank@shareholders-online.com
Exchange
Agent
Holders of Golden State Bancorp, Associates First Capital Corporation, Citicorp or Salomon Inc common stock, Citigroup Inc. Preferred Stock
Series J, K, Q, R, S, T, or U, or Salomon Inc Preferred Stock Series D or E should arrange to exchange their certificates by contacting:
Citibank Stockholder Services
P.O. Box 43035
Providence, RI 02940-3035
Telephone No. 781 575 4555
Toll-free No. 888 250 3985
Facsimile
No. 201 324 3284
E-mail address: Citibank@shareholders-online.com
The 2006 Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company, as well as annual and quarterly reports, are available from Citigroup
Document Services toll free at 877 936 2737 (outside the United States at 718 765 6514), by e-mailing a request to docserve@citigroup.com, or by writing to:
Citigroup Document Services
140 58th Street, Suite 8G
Brooklyn, NY 11220
Copies of this annual report and other Citigroup financial reports can be viewed or retrieved through the
Companys Web site at http://www.citigroup.com by clicking on the Investor Relations page and selecting SEC Filings or through the SECs Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Corporate Governance Materials
The following materials, which have been adopted
by the Company, are available free of charge on the Companys Web site at http://www.citigroup.com under the Corporate Governance page or by writing to Citigroup Inc., Corporate Governance, 425 Park Avenue, 2nd floor, New
York, New York 10043: the Companys (i) corporate governance guidelines, (ii) code of conduct, (iii) code of ethics for financial professionals, and (iv) charters of (a) the audit and risk management committee,
(b) the personnel and compensation committee, (c) the public affairs committee, and (d) the nomination and governance committee. The code of ethics for financial professionals applies to the Companys principal executive officer,
principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Amendments and waivers, if any, to the code of ethics for financial professionals will be disclosed on the Companys Web site.
178
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 (b) and (g) of the Exchange Act
A list of Citigroup securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) and (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is filed as an exhibit herewith and is available from Citigroup Inc., Corporate
Governance, 425 Park Avenue, 2nd floor, New York, New York 10043 or on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.
As of February 5,
2007, Citigroup had 4,902,502,630 shares of common stock outstanding.
As of February 5, 2007, Citigroup had approximately 202,684
common stockholders of record. This figure does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of common stock because shares are frequently held in street name by securities dealers and others for the benefit of individual owners
who may vote the shares.
Citigroup is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
Citigroup is required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Citigroup (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein nor in Citigroups 2007 Proxy Statement
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
Citigroup is a large accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Citigroup is not a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
The aggregate market value of Citigroup common stock held by non-affiliates of Citigroup on February 5, 2007 was approximately $281.7
billion.
Certain information has been incorporated by reference as described herein into Part III of this annual report from
Citigroups 2007 Proxy Statement.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 23rd day of February, 2007.
Citigroup Inc.
(Registrant)
Sallie Krawcheck
Chief
Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 23rd day of February, 2007.
Citigroups Chairman and Principal Executive Officer:
Charles Prince
Citigroups
Principal Financial Officer:
Sallie Krawcheck
Citigroups Principal Accounting Officer:
John C. Gerspach
The Directors
of Citigroup listed below executed a power of attorney appointing Sallie Krawcheck their attorney-in-fact, empowering her to sign this report on their behalf.
|
|
|
C. Michael Armstrong |
|
Andrew N. Liveris |
Alain J.P. Belda |
|
Dudley C. Mecum |
George David |
|
Anne Mulcahy |
Kenneth T. Derr |
|
Richard D. Parsons |
John M. Deutch |
|
Judith Rodin |
Roberto Hernández Ramirez |
|
Robert E. Rubin |
Ann Dibble Jordan |
|
Franklin A. Thomas |
Klaus Kleinfeld |
|
|
Sallie Krawcheck
179
CITIGROUP BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Michael Armstrong Chairman, Board of Trustees
Johns Hopkins Medicine, Health System Corporation and Hospital Alain J.P. Belda Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alcoa Inc. George David Chairman and Chief Executive Officer United
Technologies Corporation Kenneth T. Derr Chairman, Retired Chevron Corporation |
|
John M. Deutch Institute Professor Massachusetts Institute of Technology Roberto Hernández Ramírez Chairman Banco Nacional de Mexico Ann Dibble Jordan Consultant Klaus Kleinfeld President and Chief Executive Officer Siemens
AG |
|
Andrew N. Liveris Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The Dow Chemical Company Dudley C. Mecum Managing Director Capricorn Holdings, LLC Anne Mulcahy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Xerox Corporation Richard D. Parsons Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Time Warner
Inc. |
|
Charles Prince Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Citigroup Inc. Judith Rodin President Rockefeller Foundation Robert E. Rubin Chairman, Executive Committee Citigroup Inc. Franklin A. Thomas Consultant TFF Study
Group |
180
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
3.01.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Citigroup Inc. (the Company), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed
December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68949). |
|
|
3.01.2 |
|
Certificate of Designation of 5.321% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series YY, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed January 22, 1999 (No. 333-68949). |
|
|
3.01.3 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 18, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2000 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
3.01.4 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 17, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
3.01.5 |
|
Certificate of Designation of 6.767% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series YYY, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.5 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys 2001 10-K). |
|
|
3.01.6 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 18, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.6 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
3.02 |
|
By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective January 17, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2007 (File No.
1-9924). |
|
|
10.01.1* |
|
Travelers Group 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended through July 23, 1997), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 1997 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys September 30, 1997 10-Q). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.01.2* |
|
Amendment to Travelers Group 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended through July 23, 1997), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (the Companys 1999 10-K). |
|
|
10.02.1* |
|
Travelers Group Inc. Retirement Benefit Equalization Plan (as amended and restated as of January 2, 1996) (the Travelers Retirement Plan), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.04
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys 1998 10-K). |
|
|
10.02.2* |
|
Amendment to the Travelers Retirement Plan, included as part of the Action of the Senior Human Resources Officer dated January 3, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.04.1 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys 2005 10-K). |
|
|
10.03* |
|
Citigroup Inc. Amended and Restated Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (as of September 21, 2004), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.04.1* |
|
Form of Citigroup Inc. Non-Employee Director Equity Award Agreement (pursuant to the Amended and Restated Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 14, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.04.2* |
|
Form of Citigroup Inc. Non-Employee Director Equity Award Agreement (effective November 1, 2006), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.05 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys September 30, 2006 10-Q). |
|
|
10.05.1* |
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 (File No.
1-9924). |
|
|
10.05.2* |
|
Amendment to the Companys Supplemental Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.06.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1993 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.06* |
|
Citigroup 1999 Executive Performance Plan (effective January 1, 1999), incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Companys Proxy Statement dated March 8, 1999 (File No.
1-9924). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.07.1* |
|
Travelers Group Capital Accumulation Plan (as amended through July 23, 1997), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Companys September 30, 1997 10-Q. |
|
|
10.07.2* |
|
Amendment to the Travelers Group Capital Accumulation Plan (as amended through July 23, 1997), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.08.2 to the Companys 1999 10-K. |
|
|
10.08* |
|
The Travelers Inc. Deferred Compensation and Partnership Participation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1994 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.09* |
|
The Travelers Insurance Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly The Travelers Corporation TESIP Restoration and Non-Qualified Savings Plan) (as amended through December 10, 1998), incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys 1998 10-K. |
|
|
10.10* |
|
The Travelers Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended November 7, 1986), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Travelers
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1986 (File No. 1-5799). |
|
|
10.11 |
|
Citigroup Employee Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of April 17, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys 2002 10-K). |
|
|
10.12 |
|
Citigroup 2000 Stock Purchase Plan (effective May 1, 2000), amended and restated as of February 28, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys 2002
10-K. |
|
|
10.13.1* |
|
Citicorp 1988 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Citicorps Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 25, 1988 (No. 2-47648). |
|
|
10.13.2* |
|
Amendment to the Citicorp 1988 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16.2 to the Companys 1999 10-K. |
|
|
10.14* |
|
1994 Citicorp Annual Incentive Plan for Selected Executive Officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to Citicorps Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 1994 (File No. 1-5378). |
|
|
10.15.1* |
|
Citicorp 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Citicorps 1997 Proxy Statement filed February 26, 1997 (File No. 1-5378). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15.2* |
|
Amendment to the Citicorp 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19.2 to the Companys 1999 10-K. |
|
|
10.16.1* |
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Citicorp and Affiliates (as amended and restated effective January 1, 1998), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.1 to the Companys 1999
10-K. |
|
|
10.16.2* |
|
First Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Citicorp and Affiliates (as amended and restated effective January 1, 1998), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.2 to the
Companys 1999 10-K. |
|
|
10.17.1* |
|
Supplemental ERISA Compensation Plan of Citibank, N.A. and Affiliates, as amended and restated (the Citibank Supplemental ERISA Plan), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.(G) to
Citicorps Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 1-5378). |
|
|
10.17.2* |
|
Amendment to the Citibank Supplemental ERISA Plan (the Amended Citibank Supplemental ERISA Plan), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21.2 to the Companys 1999
10-K. |
|
|
10.17.3* |
|
Amendment to the Amended Citibank Supplemental ERISA Plan, included as part of, and incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10.04.1 to the Companys 2005 10-K. |
|
|
10.18* |
|
Supplemental ERISA Excess Plan of Citibank, N.A. and Affiliates, as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.(H) to Citicorps Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 1-5378). |
|
|
10.19.1* |
|
Citicorp Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, Restated May 1, 1988, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Companys 1998 10-K. |
|
|
10.19.2* |
|
Amendment to the Citicorp Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (effective as of December 31, 2001), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22.2 to the Companys 2001
10-K. |
|
|
10.20.1* |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of October 26, 1999 (the 1999 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys
1999 10-K. |
|
|
10.20.2* |
|
Amendment to the 1999 Letter Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2002 (the 2002 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.23.2 to the Companys 2001 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20.3* |
|
Amendment to the 2002 Letter Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2003 (the 2003 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.23.3 to the Companys 2002 10-K. |
|
|
10.20.4* |
|
Amendment to the 2003 Letter Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004 (the 2004 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.20.5* |
|
Amendment to the 2004 Letter Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2005 (the January 2005 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 24, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.20.6* |
|
Amendment to the January 2005 Letter Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2005 (the March 2005 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 15, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.20.7* |
|
Amendment to the March 2005 Letter Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2005 (the December 2005 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.22.7 to the Companys 2005 10-K. |
|
|
10.20.8* |
|
Amendment to the December 2005 Letter Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2006 (the March 2006 Letter Agreement), between the Company and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.01 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (File No. 1-9924) (the Companys March 31, 2006 10-Q). |
|
|
10.20.9* |
|
Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement, dated August 10, 2006, between Citiflight, Inc. and Robert E. Rubin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 11, 2006 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.20.10*+ |
|
Amendment to the March 2006 Letter Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between the Company and Robert E. Rubin. |
|
|
10.20.11*+ |
|
Trust Agreement under Robert E. Rubin Employment Arrangement, dated February 2, 2000 (the February 2000 Trust Agreement), between the Company and The Northern Trust
Company. |
|
|
10.20.12*+ |
|
First Amendment to the February 2000 Trust Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between the Company and The Northern Trust Company. |
|
|
10.21* |
|
Letter Agreement, dated October 30, 2002, between the Company and Sallie Krawcheck, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys 2002 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22* |
|
Citigroup 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective April 19, 2005), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
April 20, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.23* |
|
Form of Citigroup Directors Stock Option Grant Notification, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.24 |
|
Lease, dated as of September 25, 2002, between BP 399 Park Avenue LLC (as Landlord) and Citigroup Inc. (as Tenant), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.25* |
|
Primerica Retirement Benefit Equalization Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No.
1-9924). |
|
|
10.26.1* |
|
Form of Citigroup Equity Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 (File No.
1-9924) (the Companys September 30, 2004 10-Q). |
|
|
10.26.2* |
|
Form of Citigroup Equity Award Agreement (revised), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28.1 to the Companys 2005 10-K. |
|
|
10.26.3* |
|
Form of Citigroup Equity Award Agreement (effective November 1, 2006), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.04 to the Companys September 30, 2006 10-Q. |
|
|
10.27.1* |
|
Form of Reload Option Grant Notification, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Companys September 30, 2004 10-Q. |
|
|
10.27.2* |
|
Form of Citigroup Reload Stock Option Grant Notification (effective November 1, 2006), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Companys September 30, 2006 10-Q. |
|
|
10.28 |
|
Acquisition Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2005, by and between the Company and MetLife, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed February 4, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.29 |
|
Transaction Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2005, by and between the Company and Legg Mason, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed June 30, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
Global Distribution Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2005, by and between the Company and Legg Mason, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed June 30, 2005 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.31* |
|
Letter, dated as of May 1, 2006, to Roberto Hernandez Ramirez, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Companys March 31, 2006 10-Q. |
|
|
10.32* |
|
Citigroup Management Committee Termination Notice and Non-Solicitation Policy, effective October 2, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed October 6, 2006 (File No. 1-9924). |
|
|
10.33*+ |
|
Agreement, dated August 3, 2004, between the Company and Stephen Volk. |
|
|
12.01+ |
|
Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
12.02+ |
|
Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges Including Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
|
14.01 |
|
Code of Ethics, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.01 to the Companys 2002 10-K. |
|
|
21.01+ |
|
Subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
|
23.01+ |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
24.01+ |
|
Powers of Attorney. |
|
|
31.01+ |
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.02+ |
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.01+ |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
99.01+ |
|
Residual Value Obligation Certificate. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.02+ |
|
List of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) and Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
99.03+ |
|
Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements and Notes of Tribeca Global Investments L.P. for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006. |
The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to
any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.
Copies of any of the exhibits referred to above will be furnished at a cost of $0.25 per page (although no charge will be made for the 2006 Annual Report
on Form 10-K) to security holders who make written request therefor to Citigroup Inc., Corporate Governance, 425 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10043.
* Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.
+ Filed herewith.