As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2014

Securities Act File No. 333-180985

Investment Company Act File No. 811-05410

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-2

(Check Appropriate box or boxes)

VOYA PRIME RATE TRUST

 (Exact Name of Registrant Specified in Charter)

7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Road

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:  (800) 992-0180

Approximate Date of Proposed Offering:

As soon as practical after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any securities being registered on this form will be offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the following box.  x

It is proposed that this filing will become effective:

x When declared effective pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.

VOYA PRIME RATE TRUST

(“Registrant”)

25,000,000 Common Shares

CONTENTS OF REGISTRATION STATEMENT

This Registration Statement consists of the following papers and documents:

*                                         Cover Sheet

*                                         Contents of Registration Statement

*                                         Voya Prime Rate Trust 25,000,000 Common Shares Prospectus dated  June 30, 2014

*                                         Voya Prime Rate Trust 5,000,000 and 25,000,000 Common Shares Statement of Additional Information dated June 30, 2014

*                                         Part C

*                                         Signature Page

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

June 30, 2014

Voya Prime Rate Trust

(formerly, ING Prime Rate Trust)

7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Suite 100

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258-2034

(800) 336-3436

Voya Prime Rate Trust (“Trust”) is a diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”).  The Trust’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital.  There is no assurance that the Trust will achieve its investment objective.  The Trust is managed by Voya Investments, LLC (formerly, ING Investments, LLC) (“Voya Investments” or “Adviser”) and sub-advised by Voya Investment Management Co. LLC (formerly, ING Investment Management Co. LLC) (“Voya IM” or “Sub-Adviser”).

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) does not constitute a prospectus, but is incorporated therein by reference and should be read in conjunction with the Prospectuses relating thereto dated June 30, 2014, copies of which may be obtained without charge from the Trust or the Trust’s principal underwriter, Voya Investments Distributor, LLC (formerly, ING Investments Distributor, LLC) (“Voya Investments Distributor” or “Distributor”) at the address and phone number listed above.  This SAI does not include all the information that a prospective investor should consider before purchasing Common Shares in this offering, and investors should obtain and read the Prospectuses prior to purchasing such shares.  In addition, the Trust’s financial statements and the independent registered public accounting firm’s report thereon included in the annual shareholder report dated February 28, 2014, are incorporated herein by reference.

The Prospectuses and SAI omit certain information contained in the registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  The registration statement may be obtained from the SEC upon payment of the fee prescribed, or inspected at the SEC’s office for no charge.  The registration statement is also available on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov).  Capitalized terms used in this SAI have the same meaning as in the Prospectuses and some additional terms are defined particularly for this SAI.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

CHANGE OF NAME

The Trust changed its name from Pilgrim Prime Rate Trust to Pilgrim America Prime Rate Trust in April 12, 1996, and then changed its name back to Pilgrim Prime Rate Trust on November 16, 1998.  Effective March 1, 2002, the Trust changed its name to ING Prime Rate Trust. Effective May 1, 2014, the Trust changed its name to Voya Prime Rate Trust.

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE

The Trust’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital.  The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate secured senior loans (“Senior Loans”). Under normal market conditions, the Trust invests at least 80% of its assets in Senior Loans made to corporations or other business entities organized under U.S. or Canadian law and that are domiciled in the United States and in U.S. territories and possessions or Canada.

The Senior Loans in which the Trust invests either hold the most senior position in the capital structure of the borrower, hold an equal ranking with other senior debt, or have characteristics that the Adviser or Sub-Adviser believes justify treatment as senior debt. These Senior Loans are typically below investment-grade credit quality.

The Trust may also invest up to 20% of its total assets, measured at the time of investment, in a combination of one or more of the following types of investments: loans to borrowers organized or located in countries outside the United States and outside U.S. territories and possessions or Canada; unsecured floating rate loans, notes and other debt instruments; floating rate subordinated loans; tranches of floating rate asset-backed securities, including structured notes; short-term debt securities; and equity securities acquired in connection with investment in loans.  (See “Additional Information About Investments and Investment Techniques” later in this SAI.)  During periods when, in the opinion of the Trust’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser, a temporary defensive posture in the market is appropriate, the Trust may hold up to 100% of its assets in cash and/or in short-term debt instruments.

INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

The Trust operates under a number of investment policies and restrictions.  Certain investment restrictions of the Trust are designated as fundamental policies and as such may not be changed without the approval of a majority of the Trust’s outstanding voting securities.  In accordance with the 1940 Act, a majority of the Trust’s outstanding securities means the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of the Trust’s shares present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the Trust’s shares are present or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of the Trust’s shares.  The following investment restrictions have been designated as fundamental policies.

The Trust will not:

1.                                                        issue senior securities, except insofar as the Trust may be deemed to have issued a senior security by reason of:  (i) entering into certain interest rate hedging transactions;  (ii) entering into reverse repurchase agreements; (iii) borrowing money in an amount permitted under the 1940 Act, including the rules, regulations, interpretations thereunder, and any exemptive relief provided by the SEC; or (iv) issuing a class or classes of preferred shares in an amount not exceeding 50%, or such other percentage permitted by law, of the Trust’s total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities;

2.                                                        invest more than 25% of its total assets in any industry;

3.                                                        invest in marketable warrants other than those acquired in conjunction with Senior Loans and such warrants will not constitute more than 5% of its assets;

3

4.                                                        make investments in any one issuer other than U.S. government securities if, immediately after such purchase or acquisition, more than 5% of the value of the Trust’s total assets would be invested in such issuer, or the Trust would own more than 25% of any outstanding issue, except that up to 25% of the Trust’s total assets may be invested without regard to the foregoing restrictions.  For the purpose of the foregoing restriction, the Trust will consider the borrower of a Senior Loan to be the issuer of such Senior Loan.  In addition, with respect to a Senior Loan under which the Trust does not have privity with the borrower or would not have a direct cause of action against the borrower in the event of the failure of the borrower to pay scheduled principal or interest, the Trust will also separately meet the foregoing requirements and consider each interpositioned bank (a lender from which the Trust acquires a Senior Loan) to be an issuer of the Senior Loan;

5.                                                        act as an underwriter of securities, except to the extent that it may be deemed to act as an underwriter in certain cases when disposing of its portfolio investments or acting as an agent or one of a group of co-agents in originating Senior Loans;

6.                                                        purchase or sell equity securities (except that the Trust may, incidental to the purchase or ownership of an interest in a Senior Loan, or as part of a borrower reorganization, acquire, sell and exercise warrants and/or acquire or sell other equity securities), real estate, real estate mortgage loans, commodities, commodity futures contracts, or oil or gas exploration or development programs; or sell short, purchase or sell straddles, spreads, or combinations thereof, or write put or call options;

7.                                                        make loans of money or property to any person, except that the Trust: (i) may make loans to corporations or other business entities, or enter into leases or other arrangements that have the characteristics of a loan; (ii) may lend portfolio instruments; and (iii) may acquire securities subject to repurchase agreements;

8.                                                        purchase shares of other investment companies, except in connection with a merger, consolidation, acquisition or reorganization; or

9.                                                        make investments on margin or hypothecate, mortgage, or pledge any of its assets except for the purpose of securing borrowings as described above in connection with the issuance of senior securities and then only in an amount up to 331/3% (50% in the case of the issuance of a preferred class of shares), or such other percentage permitted by law, of the value of the Trust’s total assets (including, with respect to borrowings, the amount borrowed) less all liabilities other than borrowings (or, in the case of the issuance of senior securities, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities).

With regard to paragraph number 2 above, the Trust will consider the borrower on a loan, including a loan participation, to be the issuer of that loan.  In addition, with respect to a loan under which the Trust does not have privity with the borrower or would not have a direct cause of action against the borrower in the event of the failure of the borrower to pay scheduled principal or interest, the Trust will also consider each interpositioned bank (a lender from which the Trust acquires a loan) to be an issuer of the loan.

If a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of investment, a later increase or decrease in percentage resulting from a change in value of the Trust’s investments or amount of total assets will not be considered a violation of any of the foregoing restrictions.

There is no limitation on the percentage of the Trust’s total assets that may be invested in instruments which are not readily marketable or subject to restrictions on resale and to the extent the Trust invests in such instruments, the Trust’s portfolio should be considered illiquid.  The extent to which the Trust invests in such instruments may affect its ability to realize the net asset value (“NAV”) of the Trust in the event of the voluntary or involuntary liquidation of its assets.

4

The Trust has also adopted a non-fundamental policy as required by Rule 35d-1 under the 1940 Act to invest, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate secured Senior Loans.  The Trust has also adopted a policy to provide its shareholders with at least 60 days’ prior notice of any change in such investment policy.  If, subsequent to an investment, the 80% requirement is no longer met, the Trust’s future investments will be made in a manner that will bring the Trust into compliance with this policy.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT TECHNIQUES

Some of the different types of securities in which the Trust may invest, subject to its investment objective, policies, and restrictions, are described in the Prospectuses under “Investment Objective and Policies.”  Additional information concerning certain of the Trust’s investments and investment techniques is set forth below.

Derivatives

Generally, derivatives can be characterized as financial instruments whose value is derived, at least in part, from the value of an underlying asset or assets. Types of derivatives include swaps, options, futures contracts, options on futures, and forward contracts.  Derivative instruments may be used for a variety of reasons, including enhancing return, hedging certain market risks, or providing a substitute for purchasing or selling particular securities.  Derivatives may provide a cheaper, quicker, or more specifically focused way for the Trust to invest than “traditional” securities would.

Derivatives can be volatile and involve various types and degrees of risk, depending upon the characteristics of the particular derivative and the portfolio as a whole.  Derivatives permit the Trust to increase or decrease the level of risk, or change the character of the risk, to which its portfolio is exposed in much the same way as the Trust can increase or decrease the level of risk, or change the character of the risk, of its portfolio by making investments in specific securities.

Derivatives may be purchased on established exchanges or through privately negotiated transactions referred to as over-the-counter derivatives.  Exchange-traded derivatives generally are guaranteed by the clearing agency, which is the issuer or counterparty to such derivatives. This guarantee usually is supported by a daily payment system (i.e., margin requirements) operated by the clearing agency in order to reduce overall credit risk.  As a result, unless the clearing agency defaults, there is relatively little counterparty credit risk associated with derivatives purchased on an exchange.  By contrast, no clearing agency guarantees over-the-counter derivatives. Therefore, each party to an over-the-counter derivative bears the risk that the counterparty will default. Accordingly, the Trust will consider the creditworthiness of counterparties to over-the-counter derivatives in the same manner as they would review the credit quality of a security to be purchased by the Trust.  Over-the-counter derivatives are less liquid than exchange-traded derivatives since the other party to the transaction may be the only investor with sufficient understanding of the derivative to be interested in bidding for it.

The Trust has claimed an exclusion from the definition of a Commodity Pool Operator (“CPO”) under the Commodity Exchange Act and therefore is not subject to registration or regulation as a CPO. In February 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted regulatory changes that impact the Trust by subjecting the Trust’s adviser to registration with the CFTC as a CPO of the Trust, unless the Trust is able to comply with certain trading and marketing limitations on its investments in futures, many over-the-counter derivatives and certain other instruments. A related CFTC proposal to harmonize applicable CFTC and SEC regulations could, if adopted, mitigate certain disclosure and operational burdens where CPO registration is required for an adviser. Compliance with these additional CFTC regulatory requirements may increase Trust expenses.

Equity Securities

In connection with its purchase or holding of interests in loans, the Trust may acquire (and subsequently sell) equity

5

securities or exercise warrants that it receives.  The Trust will acquire such interests only as an incident to the intended purchase or ownership of loans or in connection with a reorganization of a borrower or its debt.  The Trust normally will not hold more than 20% of its total assets in equity securities.  Equity securities will not be treated as Senior Loans; therefore, an investment in such securities will not count toward the 80% of the Trust’s net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) that normally will be invested in Senior Loans.  Equity securities are subject to financial and market risks and can be expected to fluctuate in value.

Interest Rates and Portfolio Maturity

Interest rates on loans in which the Trust invests adjust periodically.  The interest rates are adjusted based on a base rate plus a premium or spread over the base rate.  The base rate usually is London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), the Federal Reserve federal funds rate, the Prime Rate, or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders.  LIBOR usually is an average of the interest rates quoted by several designated banks as the rates at which they pay interest to major depositors in the London interbank market on U.S. dollar-denominated deposits.  The Adviser and Sub-Adviser believe that changes in short-term LIBOR rates are closely related to changes in the Federal Reserve federal funds rate, although the two are not technically linked.  The Prime Rate quoted by a major U.S. bank is generally the interest rate at which that bank is willing to lend U.S. dollars to its most creditworthy borrowers, although it may not be the bank’s lowest available rate.

Loans in which the Trust invests typically have multiple reset periods at the same time, with each reset period applicable to a designated portion of the loan. The maximum duration of an interest rate reset on any loan in which the Trust can invest is one year.  The maximum maturity on any loan in which the Trust can invest is ten years.  The Trust’s portfolio of loans will ordinarily have a dollar-weighted average time until the next interest rate adjustment of ninety (90) days or less, although the time may exceed 90 days.  The Trust may find it possible and appropriate to use interest rate swaps and other investment practices to shorten the effective interest rate adjustment period of loans.  If the Trust does so, it will consider the shortened period to be the adjustment period of the loan.  As short-term interest rates rise, interest payable to the Trust should increase.  As short-term interest rates decline, interest payable to the Trust should decrease.  The amount of time that will pass before the Trust experiences the effects of changing short-term interest rates will depend on the dollar-weighted average time until the next interest rate adjustment on the Trust’s portfolio of loans.

Loans usually have mandatory and optional prepayment provisions.  Because of prepayments, the actual remaining maturity of a loan may be considerably less than its stated maturity.  If a loan is prepaid, the Trust will have to reinvest the proceeds in other loans or securities which may have a lower fixed spread over its base rate.  In such a case, the amount of interest paid to the Trust would likely decrease.

In the event of a change in the benchmark interest rate on a loan, the rate payable to lenders under the loan will, in turn, reset as the applicable reset period reaches its next scheduled reset date.  If the benchmark rate goes up, the Trust as lender would earn interest at a higher rate, but only on and after such reset date.  If the benchmark rate goes down, the Trust as lender would earn interest at a lower rate, but only on and after such reset date.

During normal market conditions, changes in market interest rates will affect the Trust in certain ways.  The principal effect will be that the yield on the Trust’s Common Shares will tend to rise or fall as market interest rates rise and fall.  This is because almost all of the assets in which the Trust invests pay interest at rates which float in response to changes in market rates.  However, because the interest rates on the Trust’s assets reset over time, there will be an imperfect correlation between changes in market rates and changes to rates on the portfolio as a whole.  This means that changes to the rate of interest paid on the portfolio as a whole, will tend to lag behind changes in market rates.

Market interest rate changes may also cause the Trust’s NAV to experience volatility.  This is because the value of a loan asset in the Trust is partially a function of whether it is paying what the market perceives to be a market rate of interest for the particular loan given its individual credit and other characteristics.  If market interest rates change, a loan’s value could be affected to the extent the interest rate paid on that loan does not reset at the same time.  As

6

discussed above, the rates of interest paid on the loans in which the Trust invests have a weighted average reset period that typically is less than 90 days.  Therefore, the impact of the lag between a change in market interest rates and the change in the overall rate on the portfolio is expected to be minimal.

Finally, to the extent that changes in market rates of interest are reflected, not in a change to a base rate such as LIBOR, but in a change in the spread over the base rate which is payable on loans of the type and quality in which the Trust invests, the Trust’s NAV could be adversely affected.  Again, this is because the value of a loan asset in the Trust is partially a function of whether it is paying what the market perceives to be a market rate of interest for the particular loan given its individual credit and other characteristics.  However, unlike changes in market rates of interest for which there is only a temporary lag before the portfolio reflects those changes, changes in a loan’s value based on changes in the market spread on loans in the Trust’s portfolio may be of longer duration.

Interest Rate Hedging Transactions

The Trust has the ability, pursuant to its investment objective and policies, to engage in certain hedging transactions including interest rate swaps and the purchase or sale of interest rate caps and floors. The Trust may undertake these transactions primarily for the following reasons: to preserve a return on or value of a particular investment or portion of the Trust’s portfolio; to protect against decreases in the anticipated rate of return on floating or variable rate financial instruments which the Trust owns or anticipates purchasing at a later date; or for other risk management strategies such as managing the effective dollar-weighted average duration of the Trust’s portfolio. Market conditions will determine whether and in what circumstances the Trust would employ any of the hedging techniques described below.

Interest rate swaps involve the exchange by the Trust with another party of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest, e.g., an exchange of an obligation to make floating rate payments on a specified dollar amount, referred to as the “notional” principal amount, for an obligation to make fixed-rate payments. For example, the Trust may seek to shorten the effective interest rate re-determination period of a Senior Loan in its portfolio that has an interest rate re-determination period of one year. The Trust could exchange its right to receive fixed income payments for one year from a borrower for the right to receive payments under an obligation that readjusts monthly. In such an event, the Trust would consider the interest rate re-determination period of such Senior Loan to be the shorter period.

The purchase of an interest rate cap entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified index exceeds a predetermined interest rate, to receive payments of interest on a notional principal amount from the party selling such interest rate cap. The purchase of an interest rate floor entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified index falls below a predetermined interest rate, to receive payments of interest on a notional principal amount from the party selling such interest rate floor. The Trust will not enter into swaps, caps, or floors if, on a net basis, the aggregate notional principal amount with respect to such agreements exceeds the net assets of the Trust or to the extent the purchase of swaps, caps, or floors would be inconsistent with the Trust’s other investment restrictions.

The Trust will usually enter into interest rate swaps on a net basis, i.e., where the two parties make net payments with the Trust receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. The net amount of the excess, if any, of the Trust’s obligations over its entitlement with respect to each interest rate swap will be accrued and an amount of cash or liquid securities having an aggregate NAV at least equal to the accrued excess will be maintained in a segregated account. If the Trust enters into a swap on other than a net basis, the Trust will maintain in the segregated account the full amount of the Trust’s obligations under each such swap. The Trust may enter into swaps, caps and floors with member banks of the Federal Reserve System, members of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) or other entities determined by Voya Investments. If a default occurs by the other party to such transaction, the Trust will have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction but such remedies may be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws which could materially and adversely affect the Trust’s rights as a creditor. The Trust will not treat swaps covered in accordance with applicable regulatory guidance as senior securities.

7

The swap, cap, and floor market has grown substantially in recent years with a large number of banks and financial services firms acting both as principals and as agents utilizing standardized swap documentation. As a result, this market has become relatively liquid. There can be no assurance, however, that the Trust will be able to enter into interest rate swaps or to purchase interest rate caps or floors at prices or on terms the Adviser or Sub-Adviser believes are advantageous to the Trust.  In addition, although the terms of interest rate swaps, caps and floors may provide for termination, there can be no assurance that the Trust will be able to terminate an interest rate swap or to sell or offset interest rate caps or floors that it has purchased.

The successful utilization of hedging and risk management transactions requires skills different from those needed in the selection of the Trust’s portfolio securities and depends on the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s ability to predict correctly the direction and degree of movements in interest rates. Although the Trust believes that use of the hedging and risk management techniques described above will benefit the Trust, if the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s judgment about the direction or extent of the movement in interest rates is incorrect, the Trust’s overall performance would be worse than if it had not entered into any such transactions. The Trust will incur brokerage and other costs in connection with its hedging transactions.

Lease Participations

Senior Loans that the Trust may acquire include participation interests in lease financings (“Lease Participations”) where the collateral quality, credit quality of the borrower, and the likelihood of payback are believed by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser to be the same as those applied to conventional Senior Loans.  A Lease Participation is also required to have a floating interest rate that is indexed to a benchmark indicator of prevailing interest rates, such as LIBOR or the Prime Rate.

The credit quality standards and general requirements that the Trust applies to Lease Participations including collateral quality, the credit quality of the borrower and the likelihood of payback are substantially the same as those applied to conventional Senior Loans. A Lease Participation is also required to have a floating interest rate that is indexed to the federal funds rate, LIBOR, or Prime Rate in order to be eligible for investment.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has established regulations which set forth circumstances under which national banks may engage in lease financings. Among other things, the regulation requires that a lease be a net-full payout lease representing the noncancelable obligation of the lessee and that the bank make certain determinations with respect to any estimated residual value of leased property relied upon by the bank to yield a full return on the lease. The Trust may invest in lease financings only if the Lease Participation meets these banking law requirements.

Lending Loan Interests and Other Portfolio Instruments

To generate additional income, the Trust may lend its portfolio securities, including interests in Senior Loans, in an amount equal to up to 331/3% of the Trust’s total assets to broker-dealers, major banks, or other recognized domestic institutional borrowers of securities.  No lending may be made to any companies affiliated with the Adviser or Sub-Adviser.  During the time portfolio securities are on loan, the borrower pays the Trust any dividends or interest paid on such securities and the Trust may invest the cash collateral and earn additional income, or it may receive an agreed-upon amount of interest income from the borrower who has delivered equivalent collateral or a letter of credit.  As with other extensions of credit, there are risks of delay in recovery or even loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially.

The Trust may seek to increase its income by lending financial instruments in its portfolio in accordance with present regulatory policies, including those of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the SEC.  The lending of financial instruments is a common practice in the securities industry.  The loans are required to be secured continuously by collateral, consistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act discussed below, maintained on a current basis at an amount at least equal to the market value of the portfolio instruments loaned.  The Trust has the

8

right to call a loan and obtain the portfolio instruments loaned at any time on such notice as specified in the transaction documents.  For the duration of the loan, the Trust will continue to receive the equivalent of the interest paid by the issuer on the portfolio instruments loaned and may also receive compensation for the loan of the financial instrument.  Any gain or loss in the market price of the instruments loaned that may occur during the term of the loan will be for the account of the Trust.

The Trust may lend its portfolio instruments so long as the terms and the structure of such loans are not inconsistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act, which currently require that: (a) the borrower pledge and maintain with the Trust collateral consisting of cash, a letter of credit issued by a domestic U.S. bank, or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government having a value at all times not less than 100% of the value of the instruments loaned; (b) the borrowers add to such collateral whenever the price of the instruments loaned rises (i.e., the value of the loan is marked-to-market on a daily basis); (c) the loan be made subject to termination by the Trust at any time; and (d) the Trust receives reasonable interest on the loan (which may include the Trust’s investing any cash collateral in interest bearing short-term investments), any distributions on the loaned instruments and increase in their market value.  The Trust may lend its portfolio instruments to member banks of the Federal Reserve System, members of the NYSE or other entities determined by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser to be creditworthy.  All relevant facts and circumstances, including the creditworthiness of the qualified institution, will be monitored by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser, and will be considered in making decisions with respect to the lending of portfolio instruments.

The Trust may pay reasonable negotiated fees in connection with loaned instruments.  In addition, voting rights may pass with loaned securities but if a material event were to occur affecting such a loan, the Trust will retain the right to call the loan and vote the securities.  If a default occurs by the other party to such transaction, the Trust will have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction but such remedies may be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws which could materially and adversely affect the Trust’s rights as a creditor.  However, the loans will be made only to firms deemed by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser to be of good financial standing and when, in the judgment of the Adviser or Sub-Adviser, the consideration which can be earned currently from loans of this type justifies the attendant risk.

Originating Senior Loans — Reliance on Agents

The Trust has the ability to act as an agent in originating and administering a loan on behalf of all lenders or as one of a group of co-agents in originating Senior Loans.  However, the Trust has not acted as agent or co-agent on any loans, and has no present intention of doing so in the future.  An agent for a loan is required to administer and manage the Senior Loan and to service or monitor the collateral.  The agent is also responsible for the collection of principal, interest, and fee payments from the borrower and the apportionment of these payments to the credit of all lenders which are parties to the loan agreement.  The agent is charged with the responsibility of monitoring compliance by the borrower with the restrictive covenants in the loan agreement and of notifying the lenders of any adverse change in the borrower’s financial condition.  In addition, the agent generally is responsible for determining that the lenders have obtained a perfected security interest in the collateral securing the Senior Loan.

Lenders generally rely on the agent to collect their portion of the payments on a Senior Loan and to use the appropriate creditor remedies against the borrower.  Typically under loan agreements, the agent is given broad discretion in enforcing the loan agreement and is obligated to use the same care it would use in the management of its own property.  The borrower compensates the agent for these services.  Such compensation may include special fees paid on structuring and funding the Senior Loan and other fees on a continuing basis.  The precise duties and rights of an agent are defined in the loan agreement.

When the Trust is an agent, it has as a party to the loan agreement, a direct contractual relationship with the borrower and, prior to allocating portions of the loan to lenders, if any, assumes all risks associated with the loan.  The agent may enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement.  Agents also have voting and consent rights under the applicable loan agreement.  Action subject to agent vote or consent generally requires the vote or consent of the holders of some specified percentage of the outstanding principal amount of the Senior Loan, which percentage varies depending on the relative loan agreement.  Certain decisions, such as reducing the amount or increasing the time for payment of interest on or repayment of principal of a Senior Loan, or relating

9

collateral therefore, frequently require the unanimous vote or consent of all lenders affected.

Pursuant to the terms of a loan agreement, the agent typically has sole responsibility for servicing and administering a loan on behalf of the other lenders.  Each lender in a Senior Loan is generally responsible for performing its own credit analysis and its own investigation of the financial condition of the borrower.  Generally, loan agreements will hold the agent liable for any action taken or omitted that amounts to gross negligence or willful misconduct.  In the event of a borrower’s default on a loan, the loan agreements provide that the lenders do not have recourse against the Trust for its activities as agent.  Instead, lenders will be required to look to the borrower for recourse.

In a typical interest in a Senior Loan, the agent administers the loan and has the right to monitor the collateral.  The agent is also required to segregate the principal and interest payments received from the borrower and to hold these payments for the benefit of the lenders.  The Trust normally looks to the agent to collect and distribute principal of and interest on a Senior Loan.  Furthermore, the Trust looks to the agent to use normal credit remedies, such as to foreclose on collateral, monitor credit loan covenants, and notify the lenders of any adverse changes in the borrower’s financial condition or declarations of insolvency.  At times the Trust may also negotiate with the agent regarding the agent’s exercise of credit remedies under a Senior Loan.  The agent is compensated for these services by the borrower as set forth in the loan agreement.  Such compensation may take the form of a fee or other amount paid upon the making of the Senior Loan and/or an ongoing fee or other amount.

The loan agreements in connection with Senior Loans set forth the standard of care to be exercised by the agents on behalf of the lenders and usually provide for the termination of the agent’s agency status in the event that it fails to act properly, becomes insolvent, enters Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) receivership, or if not FDIC insured, enters into bankruptcy or if the agent resigns.  In the event an agent is unable to perform its obligations as agent, another lender would generally serve in that capacity.

Other Investment Companies

An investment company is a company engaged in the business of pooling investors’ money and trading in securities for them. Examples include face-amount certificate companies, unit investment trusts and management companies. When the Trust invests in other investment companies, shareholders of the Trust bear their proportionate share of the underlying investment companies’ fees and expenses.

The Trust may invest in other investment companies to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act and the rules, regulations, and exemptive orders thereunder. For so long as shares of the Trust are purchased by another fund in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act, the Trust will not purchase securities of a registered open-end investment company or registered unit investment trust in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F) or Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act.

There are some potential disadvantages associated with investing in other investment companies.  In addition to the advisory and operational fees, the Trust bears directly in connection with its own operation, the Trust would also bear its pro-rata portions of each other investment company’s advisory and operational expenses.

When the Trust invests in other investment companies, you indirectly pay a proportionate share of the expenses of that other investment company (including management fees, administration fees, and custodial fees) in addition to the expenses of the Trust.

Additional Information on Senior Loans

Senior Loans are direct obligations of corporations or other business entities and are arranged by banks or other commercial lending institutions and made generally to finance internal growth, mergers, acquisitions, stock repurchases, and leveraged buyouts.  Senior Loans usually include restrictive covenants which must be maintained by the borrower.  Such covenants, in addition to the timely payment of interest and principal, may include mandatory prepayment provisions arising from free cash flow and restrictions on dividend payments, and usually state that a borrower must maintain specific minimum financial ratios as well as establishing limits on total debt.  A

10

breach of covenant, which is not waived by the agent, is normally an event of acceleration, i.e., the agent has the right to call the outstanding Senior Loan.  In addition, loan covenants may include mandatory prepayment provisions stemming from free cash flow.  Free cash flow is cash that is in excess of capital expenditures plus debt service requirements of principal and interest.  The free cash flow shall be applied to prepay the Senior Loan in an order of maturity described in the loan documents.  Under certain interests in Senior Loans, the Trust may have an obligation to make additional loans upon demand by the borrower.  The Trust intends to ensure its ability to satisfy such demands by segregating sufficient assets in high-quality, short-term liquid investments or by sufficiently maintaining unused borrowing capacity.

The Trust believes that the principal credit risk associated with acquiring loans from another lender is the credit risk associated with the borrower of the underlying loan.  The Trust may incur additional credit risk; however, when the Trust acquires a participation in a loan from another lender because the Trust must assume the risk of insolvency or bankruptcy of the other lender from which the loan was acquired.  However, in acquiring loans, the Trust conducts an analysis and evaluation of the financial condition of each such lender.  In this regard, if the lenders have a long-term debt rating, the long-term debt of all such participants is rated “BBB” or better by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) or “Baa” or better by Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”), or has received a comparable rating by another nationally recognized rating service.  In the absence of rated long-term debt, the lenders or, with respect to a bank, the holding company of such lenders have commercial paper outstanding which is rated at least “A-1” by S&P or “P-1” by Moody’s.  In the absence of such rated long-term debt or rated commercial paper, the Trust may acquire participations in loans from lenders whose long-term debt and commercial paper is of comparable quality to the foregoing rating standards as determined by the Adviser under the supervision of the Trustees.  The Trust also diversifies its portfolio with respect to lenders from which the Trust acquires loans.  (See, “Investment Restrictions.”)

Senior Loans, unlike certain bonds, usually do not have call protection.  This means that investments comprising the Trust’s portfolio, while having a stated one to ten-year term, may be prepaid, often without penalty.  The Trust generally holds Senior Loans to maturity unless it becomes necessary to sell them to adjust the Trust’s portfolio in accordance with the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s view of current or expected economic or specific industry or borrower conditions.

Senior Loans frequently require full or partial prepayment of a loan when there are asset sales or a securities issuance.  Prepayments on Senior Loans may also be made by the borrower at its election.  The rate of such prepayments may be affected by, among other things, general business and economic conditions, as well as the financial status of the borrower.  Prepayment would cause the actual duration of a Senior Loan to be shorter than its stated maturity.  Prepayment may be deferred by the Trust.  This should, however, allow the Trust to reinvest in a new loan and recognize as income any unamortized loan fees.  In many cases this will result in a new facility fee payable to the Trust.

Because interest rates paid on these Senior Loans fluctuate periodically with the market, it is expected that the prepayment and a subsequent purchase of a new Senior Loan by the Trust will not have a material adverse impact on the yield of the portfolio.  (See, “Portfolio Transactions.”)

Under a Senior Loan, the borrower generally must pledge as collateral, assets which may include one or more of the following: cash, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, both common and preferred stocks in its subsidiaries, trademarks, copyrights, patent rights, and franchise value.  The Trust may also receive guarantees as a form of collateral.  In some instances, a Senior Loan may be secured only by stocks in a borrower or its affiliates.  However, there is no assurance that the liquidation of the existing collateral would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of nonpayment of scheduled interest or principal, or that such collateral could be readily liquidated.

Loan Participation and Assignments

The Trust’s investment in loan participations typically will result in the Trust having a contractual relationship only

11

with the lender and not with the borrower.  The Trust will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest, and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the lender of the payments from the borrower.  In connection with purchasing participation, the Trust generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the loan, nor any right of set-off against the borrower, and the Trust may not directly benefit from any collateral supporting the loan in which it has purchased the participation.  As a result, the Trust may be subject to the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the participation.  In the event of the insolvency of the lender selling a participation, the Trust may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not benefit from any set-off between the lender and the borrower.

When the Trust purchases a loan assignment from lenders, it will acquire direct rights against the borrowers on the loan.  Because assignments are arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and potential assignors; however, the rights and obligations acquired by the Trust as the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender.  Because there is no liquid market for such securities, the Trust anticipates that such securities could be sold only to a limited number of institutional investors.  The lack of a liquid secondary market may have an adverse impact on the value of such securities and the Trust’s ability to dispose of particular assignments or participation when necessary to meet redemption of Trust shares, to meet the Trust’s liquidity needs or when necessary in response to a specific economic event, such as deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower.  The lack of a liquid secondary market for assignments and participation also may make it more difficult for the Trust to value these securities for purposes of calculating its NAV.

The Trust may be required to pay and receive various fees and commissions in the process of purchasing, selling and holding loans.  The fee component may include any, or a combination of, the following elements:  arrangement fees, assignment fees, non-use fees, facility fees, letter of credit fees, and ticking fees.  Arrangement fees are paid at the commencement of a loan as compensation for the initiation of the transaction.  A non-use fee is paid based upon the amount committed but not used under the loan.  Facility fees are on-going annual fees paid in connection with a loan.  Letter of credit fees are paid if a loan involves a letter of credit.  Ticking fees are paid from the initial commitment indication until loan closing if for an extended period.  The amount of fees is negotiated at the time of transaction.

Other Investments

Assets not invested in Senior Loans will generally consist of other instruments, including loans to borrowers organized or located in countries outside the United States and outside U.S. territories and possessions or Canada; unsecured floating rate loans, notes and other debt instruments; floating rate subordinated loans (up to a maximum of 5% of the Trust’s total assets); tranches of floating rate asset-backed securities, including structured notes, short-term debt securities, with remaining maturities of 120 days or less (which may have yields tied to the Prime Rate, commercial paper rates, the federal funds rate or LIBOR); and equity securities acquired in connection with investments in loans.  Short-term debt instruments may include: (i) commercial paper rated A-1 by S&P or P-1 by Moody’s, or of comparable quality as determined by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser; (ii) certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances, and other bank deposits and obligations; and (iii) securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities.  Under normal circumstances, the Trust may invest in cash and/or short-term instruments. During periods when, in the judgment of the Adviser or Sub-Adviser, a temporary defensive posture in the market is appropriate, the Trust may hold up to 100% of its assets in cash and/or in short-term debt instruments.

Repurchase Agreements

The Trust has the ability, pursuant to its investment objective and policies, to enter into repurchase agreements.  A repurchase agreement is a contract under which the Trust may sell and simultaneously obtain the commitment of the purchaser to sell the security back to the Trust at an agreed upon price on an agreed upon date.  Repurchase agreements will be considered borrowings by the Trust and as such, are subject to the restrictions on borrowing.  Borrowings by the Trust create an opportunity for greater total return but at the same time increase exposure to

12

capital risk.  The Trust will maintain in a segregated account with its custodian cash or liquid high grade portfolio securities in an amount sufficient to cover its obligations with respect to the repurchase agreements.  The Trust will receive payment for such securities only upon physical delivery or evidence of book entry transfer by its custodian.  Regulations of the SEC require either that securities sold by the Trust under a repurchase agreement be segregated pending repurchase or that the proceeds be segregated on the Trust’s books and records pending repurchase.  Repurchase agreements may involve certain risks in the event of default or insolvency of the other party, including possible loss from delays or restrictions upon the Trust’s ability to dispose of the underlying securities.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements

The Trust has the ability, pursuant to its investment objective and policies, to enter into repurchase agreements if the asset which is the subject of the repurchase is a loan.  Such agreements may be considered to be loans by the Trust for purposes of the 1940 Act.  Each reverse repurchase agreement must be collateralized fully, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 5b-3 under the 1940 Act, at all times.  Pursuant to such reverse repurchase agreements, the Trust acquires securities from financial institutions such as brokers, dealers, and banks, subject to the seller’s agreement to repurchase and the Trust’s agreement to resell such securities at a mutually agreed upon date and price.  The term of such an agreement is generally quite short, possibly overnight or for a few days, although it may extend over a number of months (up to one year) from the date of delivery.  The repurchase price generally equals the price paid by the Trust plus interest negotiated on the basis of current short-term rates (which may be more or less than the rate on the underlying portfolio security).  The securities underlying a reverse repurchase agreement will be marked-to-market every business day so that the value of the collateral is at least equal to the value of the loan, including the accrued interest thereon, and the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will monitor the value of the collateral.  Securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements will be held by the custodian or in the Federal Reserve/Treasury Book-Entry System. If the seller defaults on its repurchase obligation, the Trust will suffer a loss to the extent that the proceeds from a sale of the underlying securities are less than the repurchase price under the agreement.  Bankruptcy or insolvency of such a defaulting seller may cause the Trust’s rights with respect to such securities to be delayed or limited.  To mitigate this risk, the Trust only enters into reverse repurchase agreements with highly-rated, large financial institutions.  The Trust may only enter into reverse repurchase agreements that qualify for an exclusion from any automatic stay of creditors’ rights against the counterparty under applicable insolvency law in the event of the counterparty’s insolvency.

13

MANAGEMENT OF THE TRUST

The business and affairs of the Trust are managed under the direction of the Trust’s Board according to the applicable laws of the State of Massachusetts.  The Board governs the Trust and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders.  The Trustees are experienced executives who oversee the Trust’s activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to the Trust, and review the Trust’s performance.

Set forth in the table below is information regarding each Trustee of the Trust.

14

15

Information Regarding Officers of the Trust

Information about the Trust’s officers is set forth in the table below:

16

17

18

(1)                                 The Officers hold office until the next annual meeting of the Trustees and until their successors shall have been elected and qualified.

19

The Board of Trustees

The Trust is governed by the Trust’s Board, which oversees the Trust’s business and affairs.  The Board delegates the day-to-day management of the Trust to the Trust’s officers and to various service providers that have been contractually retained to provide such day-to-day services.  The Voya entities that render services to the Trust do so pursuant to contracts that have been approved by the Board.  The Trustees are experienced executives who, among other duties, oversee the Trust’s activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to the Trust, and review the Trust’s investment performance.

The Board Leadership Structure and Related Matters

Effective May 21, 2013, the membership of the Boards of Directors/Trustees overseeing the funds in the Voya family of funds were consolidated (the “Consolidation”) so that the same members serve on each board in the Voya family of funds.  Following the Consolidation, the Board is now comprised of twelve (12) members, eleven (11) of whom are independent or disinterested persons, which means that they are not “interested persons” of the funds in the Voya family of funds as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act (“Independent Trustees”).  Prior to May 21, 2013, the Board was composed of ten (10) members, eight (8) of whom were Independent Trustees.

The Trust is one of [  ] registered investment companies (with a combined total of approximately [   ] separate series) in the Voya family of funds and all of the Trustees serve as members of, as applicable, each investment company’s/trust’s Board of Directors or Board of Trustees.  The Board employs substantially the same leadership structure with respect to each of these investment companies.

One of the Independent Trustees, currently John V. Boyer, serves as the Chairman of the Board of the Trust.  The responsibilities of the Board Chairman include: coordinating with management in the preparation of agendas for Board meetings; presiding at Board meetings; between Board meetings, serving as a primary liaison with other Trustees, Officers of the Trust, management personnel and legal counsel to the Independent Trustees; and such other duties as the Board periodically may determine.  Mr. Boyer does not hold a position with any firm that is a sponsor of the Trust.  The designation of an individual as the Independent Chairman does not impose on such Independent Trustee any duties, obligations or liabilities greater than the duties, obligations or liabilities imposed on such person as a member of the Board, generally.

The Board performs many of its oversight and other activities through the committee structure described below in the “Board Committees” section. Each Committee operates pursuant to a written Charter approved by the Board. The Board currently conducts regular meetings eight (8) times a year. Six (6) of these regular meetings consist of sessions held over a two-day period and two (2) of these meetings consist of a one-day session. In addition, during the course of a year, the Board and many of its Committees typically hold special meetings by telephone or in person to discuss specific matters that require action prior to the next regular meetings.  The Independent Trustees have engaged independent legal counsel to assist them in performing their oversight responsibilities.

The Board believes that its committee structure is an effective means of empowering the Trustees to perform their fiduciary and other duties.  For example, the Board’s committee structure facilitates, as appropriate, the ability of individual Board members to receive detailed presentations on topics under their review and to develop increased familiarity with respect to such topics and with key personnel at relevant service providers. At least annually, with guidance from its Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board analyzes whether there are potential means to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Board’s operations.

Board Committees

Audit Committee.  The Board has established an Audit Committee whose functions include, among other things:  (i) meeting with the independent registered public accounting firm of the Trust to review the scope of the Trust’s audit, the Trust’s financial statements and accounting controls; (ii) meeting with management concerning these matters, internal audit activities, and other matters; and (iii) overseeing the implementation of the Voya funds’ valuation  

20

procedures and the fair value determinations made with respect to securities held by the Voya funds for which market value quotations are not readily available.  The Audit Committee currently consists of six (6) Independent Trustees.  The following Trustees currently serve as members of the Audit Committee:  Ms. Baldwin and Messrs. Drotch, Earley, Kenny, Obermeyer and Vincent. Mr. Earley currently serves as Chairperson of the Audit Committee. Ms. Baldwin and Messrs. Drotch, Earley, Kenny, Obermeyer, and Vincent have each been designated as Audit Committee Financial Experts under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The Audit Committee currently meets regularly five (5) times per year, and may hold special meetings by telephone or in person to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to the next regular meeting.  The Audit Committee held [   ] [()] meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

The Audit Committee and Compliance Committee sometimes meet jointly to consider matters that are reviewed by both Committees.  The Committees held [   ] [()] such additional joint meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

Compliance Committee.  The Board has established a Compliance Committee for the purpose of, among other things:  (i) providing oversight with respect to compliance by the funds in the Voya family of funds and their service providers with applicable laws, regulations, and internal policies and procedures affecting the operations of the Trust; (ii) serving as a committee, and in such capacity, to receive, retain, and act upon reports of evidence of possible material violations of applicable U.S. federal or state securities laws and breaches of fiduciary duty arising under U.S. federal or state laws; (iii) coordinating activities between the Board and the Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) of the funds; (iv) facilitating information flow among Board members and the CCO between Board meetings; (v) working with the CCO and management to identify the types of reports to be submitted by the CCO to the Compliance Committee and the Board; (vi) making recommendations regarding the role, performance and oversight of the CCO; (vii) overseeing the implementation of the Voya funds’ valuation procedures and the fair value determinations made with respect to securities held by the Voya funds for which market value quotations are not readily available; (viii) overseeing management’s administration of proxy voting; and (ix) overseeing the effectiveness of brokerage usage by the Trust’s advisers or sub-advisers, as applicable, and compliance with regulations regarding the allocation of brokerage for services.

The Compliance Committee currently consists of five (5) Independent Trustees: Dr. DePrince, Mses. Chadwick and Pressler, and Messrs. Boyer, and Jones. Mr. Jones currently serves as Chairperson of the Compliance Committee. The Compliance Committee currently meets regularly four (4) times per year, and may hold special meetings by telephone or in person to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to the next regular meeting.  The Compliance Committee held [   ] [()] meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

The Audit Committee and Compliance Committee sometimes meet jointly to consider matters that are reviewed by both Committees.  The Committees held [   ] [()] such additional joint meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

Contracts Committee. The Board has established a Contracts Committee for the purpose of overseeing the annual renewal process relating to investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and, at the discretion of the Board, other agreements or plans involving the Voya family of funds (including the Trust).  The responsibilities of the Contracts Committee include, among other things:  (i) identifying the scope and format of information to be provided by service providers in connection with applicable contract approvals or renewals; (ii) providing guidance to independent legal counsel regarding specific information requests to be made by such counsel on behalf of the Trustees; (iii) evaluating regulatory and other developments that might have an impact on applicable approval and renewal processes; (iv) reporting to the Trustees its recommendations and decisions regarding the foregoing matters; (v) assisting in the preparation of a written record of the factors considered by Trustees relating to the approval and renewal of advisory and sub-advisory agreements; (vi) recommending to the Board specific steps to be taken by it regarding the contracts approval and renewal process, including, for example, proposed schedules of meetings by the Trustees; and (vii) otherwise providing assistance in connection with Board decisions to renew, reject, or modify agreements or plans.

21

As of January 23, 2014, the Contracts Committee currently consists of all eleven (11) of the Independent Trustees of the Board:  Dr. DePrince, Mses. Baldwin, Chadwick and Pressler, and Messrs. Boyer, Drotch, Earley, Jones, Kenny, Obermeyer and Vincent. Ms. Pressler currently serves as Chairperson of the Contracts Committee.  Prior to January 23, 2014, the Contracts Committee (the “Prior Contracts Committee”) was made up of eight (8) Independent Trustees and met regularly seven (7) times per year and held special meetings by telephone or in person to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to the next regular meeting. The Prior Contracts Committee held [   ] [()] meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.  It is expected that the Contracts Committee will also meet regularly seven (7) times per year and may hold special meetings by telephone or in person to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to the next regular meeting.

The Board has established a Contracts Sub-Committee for the purpose of initially reviewing substantially all of the matters considered by the Contracts Committee.  The Contracts Sub-Committee currently consists of seven (7) Independent Trustees. The following Trustees serve as members of the Contracts Sub-Committee:  Dr. DePrince, Mses. Baldwin, Chadwick and Pressler, and Messrs. Boyer, Obermeyer, and Vincent.  Ms. Pressler currently serves as Chairperson of the Contracts Sub-Committee.  The Contracts Sub-Committee was newly established on January 23, 2014 [and did not meet during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.]  It is expected that the Contracts Sub-Committee will meet regularly seven (7) times per year and may hold special meetings by telephone or in person to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to the next regular meeting.

Investment Review Committees.  The Board has established, for all of the funds under its direction, the following three (3) Investment Review Committees:  (i) the Joint Investment Review Committee (“Joint IRC”); (ii) the Investment Review Committee for the Domestic Equity Funds (“DE IRC”); and (iii) the Investment Review Commmitte for the International/Balanced/Fixed-Income Funds (“I/B/F IRC”). Each of the Investment Review Committees perform the following functions, among other things:  (i) monitoring the investment performance of the funds in the Voya family of funds that are assigned to that Committee; and (ii) make recommendations to the Board with respect to investment management activities performed by the advisers and/or sub-advisers on behalf of such Voya funds, and reviewing and making recommendations regarding proposals by management to retain new or additional sub-advisers for these Voya funds.  The Trust is monitored by the Joint IRC.  Each committee is described below:

The Joint IRC currently consists of eleven (11) Independent Trustees and one (1) Trustee who is an “interested person” of the funds in the Voya family of funds, as defined in the 1940 Act (“Interested Trustee”).  The following Trustees serve as members of the Joint IRC: Dr. DePrince, Mses. Baldwin, Chadwick and Pressler, and Messrs. Boyer, Drotch, Earley, Jones, Kenny, Mathews, Obermeyer and Vincent.  Mr. Obermeyer currently serves as Chairperson of the Joint IRC.  The Joint IRC was newly established on January 23, 2014 [and did not meet during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.]  Prior to January 23, 2014, the Board held joint meetings of the I/B/F IRC and the DE IRC.  It is expected that the Joint IRC will meet regularly six (6) times per year.

The DE IRC currently consists of six (6) Independent Trustees.  The following Trustees serve as members of the DE IRC:  Ms. Baldwin, and Messrs. Boyer, Drotch, Jones, Obermeyer and Vincent.  Ms. Baldwin currently serves as Chairperson of the DE IRC.  The DE IRC, which currently meets regularly six (6) times per year, held [  ] [()] meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

The I/B/F IRC currently consists of five (5) Independent Trustees.  The following Trustees serve as members of the IBF IRC:  Dr. DePrince, Mses. Chadwick and Pressler and Messrs. Earley, Kenny, and Mathews.  Ms. Chadwick currently serves as Chairperson of the I/B/F IRC.  The I/B/F IRC, which currently meets regularly six (6) times per year, held [  ] [()] meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board has established a Nominating and Governance Committee for the purpose of, among other things:  (i) identifying and recommending to the Board candidates it proposes for

22

nomination to fill Independent Trustee vacancies on the Board; (ii) reviewing workload and capabilities of Independent Trustees and recommending changes to the size or composition of the Board, as necessary; (iii) monitoring regulatory developments and recommending modifications to the Committee’s responsibilities; (iv) considering and, if appropriate, recommending the creation of additional committees or changes to Trustee policies and procedures based on rule changes and “best practices” in corporate governance; (v) conducting an annual review of the membership and chairpersons of all Board committees and of practices relating to such membership and chairpersons; (vi) undertaking a periodic study of compensation paid to independent board members of investment companies and making recommendations for any compensation changes for the Independent Trustees; (vii) overseeing the Board’s annual self-evaluation process; (viii) developing (with assistance from management) an annual meeting calendar for the Board and its committees; and (ix) overseeing actions to facilitate attendance by Independent Trustees at relevant educational seminars and similar programs.

In evaluating potential candidates to fill Independent Trustee vacancies on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider a variety of factors, but it has not at this time set any specific minimum qualifications that must be met.  Specific qualifications of candidates for Board membership will be based on the needs of the Board at the time of nomination.  The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominations received from shareholders and shall assess shareholder nominees in the same manner as it reviews nominees that it identifies as potential candidates.  A shareholder nominee for Trustee should be submitted in writing to the Trustee’s Secretary at 7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Suite 100, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258.  Any such shareholder nomination should include at least the following information as to each individual proposed for nominations as Trustee: such person’s written consent to be named in a proxy statement as a nominee (if nominated) and to serve as a Trustee (if elected), and all information relating to such individual that is required to be disclosed in the solicitation of proxies for election of Trustees, or is otherwise required, in each case under applicable federal securities laws, rules, and regulations, including such information as the Board may reasonably deem necessary to satisfy its oversight and due diligence duties.

The Secretary shall submit all nominations received in a timely manner to the Nominating and Governance Committee.  To be timely in connection with a shareholder meeting to elect Trustees, any such submission must be delivered to the Trust’s Secretary not earlier than the 90th day prior to such meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to such meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made, by either the disclosure in a press release or in a document publicly filed by the Trust with the SEC.

The Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of five (5) Independent Trustees.  The following Trustees serve as members of the Nominating and Governance Committee: Ms. Baldwin and Messrs. Boyer, Drotch, Jones and Kenny.  Mr. Kenny currently serves as Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee typically meets three (3) times per year and on an as-needed bases.  The Committee held [   ] [()] meetings during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

The Board’s Risk Oversight Role

The day-to-day management of various risks relating to the administration and operation of the Trust is the responsibility of management and other service providers retained by the Board or by management, most of whom employ professional personnel who have risk management responsibilities.  The Board oversees this risk management function consistent with and as part of its oversight duties.  The Board performs this risk management oversight function directly and, with respect to various matters, through its committees.  The following description provides an overview of many, but not all, aspects of the Board’s oversight of risk management for the Trust.  In this connection, the Board has been advised that it is not practicable to identify all of the risks that may impact the Trust or to develop procedures or controls that are designed to eliminate all such risk exposures, and that applicable securities law regulations do not contemplate that all such risks be identified and addressed.

The Board, working with management personnel and other service providers, has endeavored to identify the primary risks that confront the Trust.  In general, these risks include, among others: (i) investment risks; (ii) credit risks; (iii) 

23

liquidity risks; (iv) valuation risks; (v) operational risks; (vi) reputational risks; (vii) regulatory risks; (viii) risks related to potential legislative changes; and (ix) the risk of conflicts of interest affecting Voya affiliates in managing the Trust.  The Board has adopted and periodically reviews various policies and procedures that are designed to address these and other risks confronting the Fund.  In addition, many service providers to the Trust have adopted their own policies, procedures and controls designed to address particular risks to the Trust.  The Board and persons retained to render advice and service to the Board periodically review and/or monitor changes to and developments relating to the effectiveness of these policies and procedures.

The Board oversees risk management activities in part through receipt and review by the Board or its committees of regular and special reports, presentations and other information from officers of the Fund, including the CCOs for the Trust and its investment adviser and the Trust’s Chief Investment Risk Officer (“CIRO”), and from other service providers.  For example, management personnel and the other persons make regular reports and presentations to: (i) the Compliance Committee regarding compliance with regulatory requirements; (ii) the Investment Review Committees regarding investment activities and strategies that may pose particular risks; (iii) the Audit Committee with respect to financial reporting controls and internal audit activities; (iv) the Nominating and Governance Committee regarding corporate governance and best practice developments; and (v) the Contracts Committee regarding regulatory and related developments that might impact the retention of service providers to the Company.  The CIRO oversees an Investment Risk Department (“IRD”) that provides an independent source of analysis and research for Board members in connection with their oversight of the investment process and performance of portfolio managers.  Among its other duties, the IRD seeks to identify and, where practicable, measure the investment risks being taken by the Fund’s portfolio managers.  Although the IRD works closely with management of the Fund in performing its duties, the CIRO is directly accountable to and maintains an ongoing dialogue with the Independent Trustees.

Qualifications of the Trustees

The Board believes that each of the Trustees is qualified to serve as a Trustee of the Trust based on its review of the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each Trustee.  The Board bases this conclusion on its consideration of various criteria, no one of which is controlling.  Among others, the Board has considered the following factors with respect to each Trustee: strong character and high integrity; an ability to review, evaluate, analyze and discuss information provided; the ability to exercise effective business judgment in protecting shareholder interests while taking into account different points of view; a background in financial, investment, accounting, business, regulatory or other skills that would be relevant to the performance of a Trustee’s duties; the ability and willingness to commit the time necessary to perform his or her duties; and the ability to work in a collegial manner with other Board members.  Each Trustee’s ability to perform his or her duties effectively is evidenced by his or her: experience in the investment management business; related consulting experience; other professional experience; experience serving on the boards of directors of other public companies; educational background and professional training; prior experience serving on the Board of Trustees of the Trust, as well as the boards of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds and/or of other investment companies; and experience as attendees or participants in conferences and seminars that are focused on investment company matters and/or duties that are specific to board members of registered investment companies.

Information indicating certain of the specific experience and qualifications of each Trustee relevant to the Board’s belief that the Trustee should serve in this capacity is provided in the table above that provides information about each Trustee.  That table includes, for each Trustee, positions held with the Trust, the length of such service, principal occupations during the past five (5) years, the number of series within the Voya family of funds for which the Trustee serves as a Board member and certain directorships held during the past five (5) years.  Set forth below are certain additional specific experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that the Board believes support a conclusion that each Trustee should serve as a Board member in light of the Trust’s business and structure.

Colleen D. Baldwin has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2007.  She also served as the Chairperson of the Board’s DE IRC since January 23, 2014 and, prior to that, as the Chairperson of the Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee since 2009.  Ms. Baldwin is  

24

currently an Independent Director of DSM/Dentaquest and is a member of its Audit and Finance/Investment Review Committees.  Ms. Baldwin has been President of Glantuam Partners, LLC, a business consulting firm, since 2009.  Prior to that, she served in senior positions at the following financial services firms: Chief Operating Officer for Ivy Asset Management, Inc. (2002-2004), a hedge fund manager; Chief Operating Officer and Head of Global Business and Product Development for AIG Global Investment Group (1995-2002), a global investment management firm; Senior Vice President at Bankers Trust Company (1994-1995); and Senior Managing Director at J.P. Morgan & Company (1987-1994).  Ms. Baldwin began her career in 1981 at AT&T/Bell Labs as a systems analyst. Ms. Baldwin holds a B.S. from Fordham University and an M.B.A. from Pace University.

John V. Boyer has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2005.  He also has served as Chairperson of the Trust’s Board since January 22, 2014, and prior to that, as Chairperson of the Trust’s I/B/F IRC since 2006.  Since 2008, Mr. Boyer has been President of the Bechtler Arts Foundation for which, among his other duties, Mr. Boyer oversees all fiduciary aspects of the Foundation and assists in the oversight of the Foundation’s endowment fund.  Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute (2006-2007) and as Executive Director of The Mark Twain House & Museum (1989-2006) where he was responsible for overseeing business operations, including endowment funds.  He also served as a board member of certain predecessor mutual funds of the Voya family of funds (1997-2005).  Mr. Boyer holds a B.A. from the University of California, Santa Barbara and an M.F.A. from Princeton University.

Patricia W. Chadwick has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2006.  She also has served as Chairperson of the Trust’s I/B/F IRC since January 23, 2014 and, prior to that, as Chairperson of the Trust’s DE IRC since 2007.   Since 2000, Ms. Chadwick has been the Founder and President of Ravengate Partners LLC, a consulting firm that provides advice regarding financial markets and the global economy.  She also is a director of The Royce Funds (since 2009), Wisconsin Energy Corp. (since 2006), and AMICA Mutual Insurance Company (since 1992).  Previously, she served in senior roles at several major financial services firms where her duties included the management of corporate pension funds, endowments, and foundations, as well as management responsibilities for an asset management business.  Ms. Chadwick holds a B.A. from Boston University and is a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Dr. Albert E. DePrince, Jr. has been a Trustee of the Trust since May 21, 2013, the date of the Consolidation, and a board member of other Voya funds since 1998.  Dr. DePrince has been a professor of Economics and Finance at Middle Tennessee State University since 1991. Prior to joining the faculty at Middle Tennessee State University, Dr. DePrince served in various business positions, including 12 years at Marine Midland Bank in New York City, where he held the positions of Chief Economist and Senior Vice President, and nine years as an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Dr. DePrince holds a B.A. in Economics from Bucknell University, an M.A. in Economics from the University of Michigan, and a Ph.D. in Economics from New York University. Dr. DePrince also served as Director at the Business and Economic Research Center at Middle Tennessee State University from 1999 to 2002 and has published numerous scholarly papers and journal articles in the areas of financial markets, financial institutions, mutual fund performance, and monetary policy.

Peter S. Drotch has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2007.  Prior to his retirement in 2000, he was a partner at the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was the leader of the firm’s U.S. Investment Management practice group and a member of its global leadership team where he acquired extensive experience with respect to audits and other financial matters relating to registered investment companies.  Since his retirement, he also has served on the boards of registered investment companies in other fund complexes (the State Street Research Funds and BlackRock Funds) from 2005 to 2007 and as a consultant with respect to investment company regulatory compliance matters.  Mr. Drotch is also a Director of First Marblehead Corporation (student loans) and Tufts Health Plan (health insurance) a Director of the University of Connecticut Foundation, Inc., and a member of the General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute’s Independent Directors Council. Mr. Drotch holds a B.S. from the University of Connecticut and is a retired Certified Public Accountant.

25

J. Michael Earley has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2002.  He also has served as Chairperson of the Trust’s Audit Committee since 2003.  Mr. Earley retired in 2008 as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bankers Trust Company, N.A. (Des Moines, Iowa), where he had worked since 1992.  He also has served on the boards of directors of that company (1992-2009) and of Midamerica Financial Corporation (2002-2009), and as a board member of certain predecessor mutual funds of the Voya family of funds (1997-2002).  Mr. Earley holds a B.B.A. and a J.D. from the University of Iowa.

Russell H. Jones has been a Trustee of the Trust since May 21, 2013, the date of the Consolidation, and a board member of other Voya funds since December 2007.  He has also served as Chairperson of the Trust’s Compliance Committee since January 23, 2014. From 1973 until his retirement in 2008, Mr. Jones served in various positions at Kaman Corporation, an aerospace and industrial distribution manufacturer, including Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer, Principal Investor Relations Officer, Principal Public Relations Officer and Corporate Parent Treasurer. Mr. Jones served as an Independent Director and Chair of the Contracts Committee for CIGNA Mutual Funds from 1995 until 2005. Mr. Jones also served as President of the Hartford Area Business Economists from 1986 until 1987. Mr. Jones holds a B.A. from the University of Connecticut and an M.A. from the Hartford Seminary.

Patrick W. Kenny has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2005.  He also has served as the Chairperson of the Trust’s Nominating and Governance Committee since January 23, 2014 and, prior to that, Chairperson of the Trust’s Compliance Committee since 2006.  He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer (2001-2009) of the International Insurance Society (insurance trade association), Executive Vice President (1998-2001) of Frontier Insurance Group (property and casualty insurance company), Senior Vice President (1995-1998) of SS&C Technologies (software and technology company), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1994) of Aetna Life & Casualty Company (multi-line insurance company), and as Partner (until 1988) of KPMG (accounting firm).  Mr. Kenny currently serves (since 2004) on the board of directors of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (provider of financial guaranty insurance) and previously served on the boards of Odyssey Re Holdings Corporation (multi-line reinsurance company) (2006-2009) and of certain predecessor mutual funds of the Voya family of funds (2002-2005).  Mr. Kenny holds a B.B.A. from the University of Notre Dame and an M.S. from the University of Missouri and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Shaun P. Mathews has been a Trustee of the Fund and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2007.  He also is President and Chief Executive Officer of Voya Investments, LLC (2006 to present).  Mr. Mathews previously served as President of Voya Mutual Funds and Investment Products (2004-2006) and several other senior management positions in various aspects of the financial services business.

Joseph E. Obermeyer has been a Trustee of the Trust since May 21, 2013, the date of the Consolidation, and a board member of other Voya funds since 2003.  He has also served as the Chairperson of the Trust’s Joint IRC since January 23, 2014. Mr. Obermeyer is the founder and President of Obermeyer & Associates, Inc., a provider of financial and economic consulting services since 1999. Prior to founding Obermeyer & Associates, Mr. Obermeyer had more than 15 years of experience in accounting, including serving as a Senior Manager at Arthur Andersen LLP from 1995 until 1999.  Previously, Mr. Obermeyer served as a Senior Manager at Coopers & Lybrand LLP from 1993 until 1995, as a Manager at Price Waterhouse from 1988 until 1993, Second Vice President from 1985 until 1988 at Smith Barney, and as a consultant with Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1984 until 1985. Mr. Obermeyer holds a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Cincinnati, an M.B.A. from Indiana University, and post graduate certificates from the University of Tilburg and INSEAD.

Sheryl K. Pressler has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2006.  She also has served as Chairperson of both the Trust’s Contracts Committee and Contracts Sub-Committee since 2007, and January 23, 2014, respectively.  Ms. Pressler has served as a consultant on financial matters since 2001.  Previously, she held various senior positions involving financial services, including as Chief Executive Officer (2000-2001) of Lend Lease Real Estate Investments, Inc. (real estate investment management and mortgage servicing firm), Chief Investment Officer (1994-2000) of California Public Employees’ Retirement System (state pension fund), Director of Stillwater Mining Company (May 2002 — May 2013), and

26

Director of Retirement Funds Management (1981-1994) of McDonnell Douglas Corporation (aircraft manufacturer).  Ms. Pressler holds a B.A. from Webster University and an M.B.A. from Washington University.

Roger B. Vincent has been a Trustee of the Trust and a board member of other investment companies in the Voya family of funds since 2002.  He also previously served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees 2007 — January 21, 2014 and, prior to that, as Chairperson of the Contracts Committee and the DE IRC.  Mr. Vincent retired in 2011 as President of Springwell Corporation (a corporate finance firm).  He is a Director of UGI Corporation and UGI Utilities, Inc. (since 2006).  He previously worked for 20 years at Bankers Trust Company where he was a Managing Director and a member of the bank’s senior executive partnership.  He also previously served as a Director of AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (1998-2006), Tatham Offshore, Inc. (1996-2000), and Petrolane, Inc. (1993-1995), and as a board member of certain predecessor funds of the Voya family of funds (1993-2002).  Mr. Vincent is a board member of the Mutual Fund Directors Forum and a past Director of the National Association of Corporate Directors. Mr. Vincent holds a B.S. from Yale University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University.

Trustee Ownership of Securities

In order to further align the interests of the Independent Trustees with shareholders, it is the policy of the Board for Independent Trustees to own, beneficially, shares of one or more funds in the Voya family of funds at all times (“Ownership Policy”).  For this purpose, beneficial ownership of shares of a Voya fund includes, in addition to direct ownership of Voya fund shares, ownership of a variable annuity contract or a variable life insurance policy whose proceeds are invested in a Voya fund within the Voya family of funds, as well as deferred compensation payments under the Board’s deferred compensation arrangements pursuant to which the future value of such payments is based on the notional value of designated funds within the Voya family of funds.

Under this Ownership Policy, the initial value of investments in the Voya family of funds that are beneficially owned by a Trustee must equal at least $100,000.  The Ownership Policy provides that a new Trustee shall satisfy the foregoing requirements within a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed three years, after becoming a Trustee.  A decline in the value of any Trustee’s investments in the Voya family of funds will not cause a Trustee to have to make any additional investments under this Ownership Policy.  As of December 31, 2013, all Independent Trustees are in compliance with this Ownership Policy.

Investment in mutual funds of the Voya family of funds by the Trustees pursuant to this Ownership Policy are subject to:  (1) policies, applied by the mutual funds of the Voya family of funds to other similar investors, that are designed to prevent inappropriate market timing trading practices; and (2) to any provisions of the Code of Ethics for the Voya family of funds that otherwise apply to the Trustees.

Trustees’ Trust Equity Ownership Positions

The following table sets forth information regarding each Trustee’s ownership of equity securities in the Trust and the aggregate holdings of shares of equity securities of all funds in the Voya family of funds overseen by the Trustees for the calendar year ended December 31, 2013:

27

(1)           Held in a Deferred Compensation Account and/or 401(k) account..

Independent Trustee Ownership of Securities of the Adviser, the Underwriter and their Affiliates

The following tables sets forth information regarding each Independent Trustee’s (and his or her immediate family members’) share ownership in securities of the Trust’s investment adviser or principal underwriter, and the ownership of securities in an entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Trust (not including registered investment companies) as of December 31, 2013.

Trustee Compensation

Each Trustee is reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with each meeting of the Board or any of its Committee meetings attended.  Each Independent Trustee is compensated for his or her services, on a quarterly basis, according to a fee schedule adopted by the Board.  The current fee schedule consists of an annual retainer, compensation for Board and Committee Chairpersons, and additional compensation for attendance at regularly scheduled meetings.  The Board may from time to time designate other meetings as subject to compensation.

Effective January 1, 2014, the Trust pays each Trustee who is not an interested person of the Trust his or her pro rata share, as described below, of: (i) an annual retainer of $230,000; (ii) Mr. Boyer, as Chairperson of the Board, receives an additional annual retainer of $100,000; (iii) Mses. Baldwin, Chadwick, and Pressler and Messrs. Earley, Jones, Kenny and Obermeyer as Chairpersons of Committees of the Board, each receives an additional annual retainer of $30,000, $30,000, $65,000, $25,000, $25,000, $25,000, and $30,000, respectively; (iv) $10,000 per attendance at any of the regularly scheduled meetings (four (4) quarterly meetings, two (2) auxiliary meetings, and two (2)

28

annual contract review meetings); and (v) out-of-pocket expenses. The Board at its discretion may from time to time designate other special meetings as subject to an attendance fee in the amount of $5,000 for in-person meetings and $2,500 for special telephonic meetings.

Prior to January 1, 2014 the Trust paid each Trustee who was not an interested person of the Trust a pro rata share, as described below, of:  (i) an annual retainer of $200,000; (ii) Mr. Vincent, as Chairman of the Board, received an additional annual retainer of $80,000; (iii) Mses. Baldwin, Chadwick, and Pressler and Messrs. Earley, Boyer and Kenny, as Chairpersons of Committees of the Board, each received an additional annual retainer of $25,000, $30,000, $65,000, $25,000, $30,000, and $25,000, respectively; (iv) $10,000 per attendance at any of the regularly scheduled meetings (four (4) quarterly meetings, two (2) auxiliary meetings, and two (2) annual contract review meetings); and (v) out-of-pocket expenses.  The Board at its discretion could from time to time designate other special meetings as subject to an attendance fee in the amount of $5,000 for in-person meetings and $2,500 for special telephonic meetings.

The pro rata share paid by the Trust is based on the Trust’s average net assets as a percentage of the average net assets of all the funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliate, Directed Services LLC, for which the Trustees serve in common as Trustees.

Future Compensation Payment

Certain future payment arrangements were in place prior to the Consolidation.  More particularly, each non-interested Trustee, with the exception of Dr. DePrince and Messrs. Gavin, Jones, and Obermeyer, who was a Trustee on or before May 9, 2007, and who will have served as a non-interested Trustee for five or more years for one or more in the Voya family of funds is entitled to a future payment (“Future Payment”), if such Trustee: (i) retires in accordance with the Board’s retirement policy; (ii) dies; or (iii) becomes disabled.  The Future Payment shall be made promptly to, as applicable, the Trustee or the Trustee’s estate, in an amount equal to two (2) times the annual compensation payable to such Trustee, as in effect at the time of his or her retirement, death or disability if the Trustee had served as Trustee for at least five years as of May 9, 2007, or in a lesser amount calculated based on the proportion of time served by such Trustee (as compared to five years) as of May 9, 2007.  The annual compensation determination shall be based upon the annual Board membership retainer fee in effect at the time of that Trustee’s retirement, death or disability (but not any separate annual retainer fees for chairpersons of committees and of the Board), provided that the annual compensation used for this purpose shall not exceed the annual retainer fees as of May 9, 2007.  This amount shall be paid by the Voya fund or Voya funds on whose Board the Trustee was serving at the time of his or her retirement, death, or disability. Each applicable Trustee may elect to receive payment of his or her benefit in a lump sum or in three substantially equal payments.

Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information provided by the Trust’s Adviser regarding compensation of the Trustees by the Trust and other funds managed by the Adviser and its affiliates for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013.  Officers of the Trust and Trustees who are interested persons of the Trust do not receive any compensation from the Trust or any other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates.

29