Edgar Filing: ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2007

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-50295

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

(EXACT NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE		87-0656515
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF		(I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)		IDENTIFICATION NO.)

1201 HARBOR BAY PARKWAY, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA 94502

(ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (510) 748-4900

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

Indicate by check mark whether the small business issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the small business issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class:		Outstanding at May 3, 2007:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share		49,474,592 shares

Transitional Small Business Disclosure format (check one)

Yes o No x

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		1
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION		20
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		41
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		41
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		41
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		41
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS		41
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION		41
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS		42
SIGNATURE		43

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB and the materials incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We use words such as “may,” “assumes,” “forecasts,” “positions,” “predicts,” “strategy,” “will,” “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “budgets,” “potential,” “continue” and variations thereof, and other statements contained in quarterly report, and the exhibits hereto, regarding matters that are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements. Because these statements involve risks and uncertainties, as well as certain assumptions, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to risks inherent in: our early stage of development, including a lack of operating history, lack of profitable operations and the need for additional capital; the development and commercialization of largely novel and unproven technologies and products; our ability to protect, maintain and defend our intellectual property rights; uncertainties regarding our ability to obtain the capital resources needed to continue research and development operations and to conduct research, preclinical development and clinical trials necessary for regulatory approvals; uncertainty regarding the outcome of clinical trials and our overall ability to compete effectively in a highly complex, rapidly developing, capital intensive and competitive industry. See “RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS” set forth on page 26 herein for a more complete discussion of these factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements include our plans and objectives for future operations, including plans and objectives relating to our products and our future economic performance. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, future business decisions, and the time and money required to successfully complete development and commercialization of our technologies, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, we cannot assure you that the results contemplated in any of the forward-looking statements contained herein will be realized. Based on the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of any such statement should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved.

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
BALANCE SHEET

	March 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,746,830			$	8,689,336
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $236,399 and $236,399	55,456				66,319
Prepaid expenses	157,712				111,229
Deferred royalty fees, current portion	286,275				225,475
Total current assets	4,246,273				9,092,359
Property and equipment, net	1,026,822				1,081,680
Deferred royalty fees, less current portion	1,458,385				1,062,620
Deposits	138,841				133,841
Deferred issuance costs, net of amortization of $329,036 and $1,035,120	4,583,206				5,619,218
Total assets	$	11,453,527			$	16,989,718
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2,440,041			$	3,067,825
Accrued expenses	1,149,096				1,023,583
Deferred revenue, current portion	497,374				432,509
Interest payable	75,833				75,833
Advances payable—other	130,000				130,000
2005 Convertible debenture and embedded derivatives, net of discounts of $1,800,515 and $3,713,554	4,485,754				7,354,706
2006 Convertible debenture and embedded derivatives (fair value $5,131,950 and $5,472,177)	4,160,035				3,971,543
Warrant and option derivatives—current portion	3,707,606				2,264,175
Capital leases—current portion	77,594				77,594
Notes payable—other	638,674				638,674
Total current liabilities	17,362,006				19,036,442
2005 Convertible debenture and embedded derivatives, less current portion and net of discounts of $382,507 and $1,571,332	952,967				3,112,029
2006 Convertible debenture and embedded derivatives, less current portion (fair value $16,862,124 and $12,768,413)	13,668,685				9,266,933
Warrant and option derivatives, less current portion	16,988,265				12,987,967
Capital leases, less current portion	12,481				31,971
Deferred revenue, less current portion	1,907,492				2,096,700
Total liabilities	50,891,897				46,532,042
Commitments and contingencies	—				—
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding	—				—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 48,969,882 issued and outstanding	48,970				39,318
Additional paid-in capital	22,317,378				12,291,873
Accumulated deficit	(61,804,719		)		(41,873,515		)
Total stockholders’ deficit	(39,438,371		)		(29,542,324		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	11,453,527			$	16,989,718

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2007			2006
Revenue:
License fees and royalties	$	124,343		$	83,127
Cost of revenue	61,436			61,189
Gross profit	62,908			21,938
Operating expenses:
Research and development	3,649,088			1,808,566
Grant reimbursements	(57,582		)	(200,905		)
General and administrative	1,741,104			2,630,037
Total operating expenses	5,332,610			4,237,698
Loss from operations	(5,269,703		)	(4,215,760		)
Other income (expense):
Interest income	78,047			118,466
Interest expense and late fees	(4,977,140		)	(3,081,014		)
Charges related to repricing of 2005 Convertible Debentures and Warrants	(843,277		)	—
Adjustments to fair value of derivatives	(8,919,131		)	11,991,677
Total other income (expense)	(14,661,502		)	9,029,129
Net Loss	$	(19,931,204	)	$	4,813,369
Basic earnings per share	$	(0.49	)	$	0.20
Diluted earnings per share	$	(0.49	)	$	0.09
Weighted average shares used in computation of earnings per share
Basic	40,623,810			23,767,391
Diluted	40,623,810			57,332,947

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(19,931,204	)	$	4,813,369
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	93,997			37,661
Amortization of deferred charges	61,436			41,190
Amortization of deferred revenue	(124,343		)	(83,126		)
Amortization of deferred issuance costs	1,036,012			207,029
Shares issued for services	—			331,828
Amortization of discounts	3,938,622			2,860,227
Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives	8,919,131			(11,991,677		)
Repricing of 2005 Convertible Debentures and Warrants	843,277			—
Non-cash compensation charge	1,479,208			114,262
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable	10,863			10,626
Prepaid expenses	(46,483		)	16,719
Deferred charges	(518,001		)	(185,000		)
Deposits	—			(17,151		)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(502,271		)	(382,110		)
Interest payable	—			11,250
Net cash used in operating activities	(4,739,754		)	(4,214,905		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment	(39,139		)	(213,247		)
Payment of deposits	(5,000		)	—
Net cash used in investing activities	(44,139		)	(213,247		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from exercise of warrants	—			6,100
Payments on convertible debentures	(139,123		)	—
Payments on notes and leases	(19,490		)	(31,375		)
Settlement payment	—			(19,484		)
Net cash (paid)/provided by financing activities	(158,613		)	(44,759		)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash	(4,942,507		)	(4,472,911		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	8,689,336			13,857,901
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	3,746,830			9,384,990
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	2,504		$	2,509
Income taxes	$	—		$	—

Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007:

The Company issued approximately 2,670,033 shares of common stock in redemption of convertible debentures with a face value of approximately $1,722,000.

The Company issued approximately 5,630,870 shares of common stock in conversion of convertible debentures with a face value of approximately $5,067,790.

The Company issued approximately 36,000 shares of common stock in payment of board fees of approximately $21,000.

The Company issued approximately 800,000 shares of common stock in payment of license fees of $608,000.

The Company issued approximately 515,000 shares of common stock in payment of employee bonuses of $407,000.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 (UNAUDITED)

				Additional					Total
	Common Stock			Paid-In		Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance at December 31, 2006	39,318,070	$	39,318	$	12,291,873	$	(41,873,515	)	$	(29,542,324	)
Convertible Debenture Redemption	2,670,033	2,670		1,719,427		—			1,722,097
Convertible Debenture Conversion	5,630,870	5,631		7,077,316		—			7,082,947
Issuance of stock in payment of board fees	35,909	36		20,716		—			20,752
Option compensation charges	—	—		194,511		—			194,511
Issuance of stock in payment of license fees	800,000	800		607,200		—			608,000
Issuance of stock in payment of employee bonuses	515,000	515		406,335		—			406,850
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2007	—	—				(19,931,204		)	(19,931,204		)
Balance at March 31, 2007	48,969,882	$	48,970	$	22,317,378	$	(61,804,719	)	$	(39,438,371	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2007

(UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS

Organization

On January 31, 2005, Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (formerly known as A.C.T. Holdings, Inc.) (the “Company”) completed a merger with Advanced Cell, Inc. (formerly known as Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (“ACT”), pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company merged with and into ACT, with ACT remaining as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Upon the completion of the merger, the Company ceased all of its pre-merger operations and adopted the business of ACT.

Prior to the merger, the Company had minimal business, operations, revenues and assets, and had been involved in an industry entirely unrelated to the business of ACT. Therefore, the acquisition of ACT by the Company represented a complete change in the nature of the Company’s business and operations, and changed the nature of any prior investment in the Company.

The transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of ACT, the accounting acquirer. The historical financial statements presented for periods prior to the merger are those of ACT.

On November 18, 2005, a majority of the Company’s stockholders approved the reincorporation of the Company from the state of Nevada to the state of Delaware pursuant to a merger of the Company with and into a newly formed Delaware corporation, followed by a “roll up” merger to combine the operating subsidiary with the Company.

Nature of Business

The Company is a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing human stem cell technology in the emerging fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy. Principal activities to date have included obtaining financing, securing operating facilities and conducting research and development. The Company has no therapeutic products currently available for sale and does not expect to have any therapeutic products commercially available for sale for a period of years, if at all. These factors indicate that the Company’s ability to continue its research and development activities is dependent upon the ability of management to obtain additional financing as required.

Going Concern

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has losses from operations, negative cash flows from operations, a substantial stockholders’ deficit and current liabilities exceed current assets. The Company will thus not be able to continue as a going concern and fund cash requirements for operations through March 15, 2008 with current cash reserves. As more fully described in Note 3—Convertible Debentures—2006 and Note 5—Warrant and Option Derivatives, the Company was able to raise cash in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Notwithstanding success in raising capital, there continues to be substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which, in turn, is dependent upon the Company’s ability to continue to raise capital and ultimately generate positive cash flows from operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or

amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue its existence.

In the first three months of 2007, management has taken or plans to take the following steps that it believes will be sufficient to provide the Company with the ability to continue in existence:

· Management anticipates raising additional future capital from its current convertible debenture holders, or other financing sources, that will be used to fund any capital shortfalls. The terms of any financing will likey be negotiated based upon current market terms for similar financings. No commitments have been received for additional investment and no assurances can be given that this financing will ultimately be completed.

· Management has focused its scientific operations on product development in order to accelerate the time to market of products which will ultimately generate revenues. While the amount or timing of such revenues can not be determined, Management believes that focused development will ultimately provide a quicker path to revenues, and an increased likelihood of raising additional financing.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-QSB.

Use of Estimates—These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and, accordingly, require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Specifically, our management has estimated variables used to calculate the Black Scholes and binomial lattice model calculations used to value derivative instruments discussed below under “Valuation of Derivative Instruments”. In addition, management has estimated the expected economic life and value of our licensed technology, our net operating loss for tax purposes, share-based payments to compensation to employees, directors, consultants and investment banks, the useful lives of our fixed assets and our allowance for bad debts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications—Certain prior year financial statement balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the recorded net loss.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses related to this concentration of risk.

Accounts Receivable—We periodically assess our accounts receivable for collectibility on a specific identification basis. If collectibility of an account becomes unlikely, we record an allowance for that doubtful account. Once we have exhausted efforts to collect, we write off the account receivable against the allowance we have already created. We do not require collateral for our trade accounts receivable.

Equipment—We record our equipment at historical cost. We expense maintenance and repairs as incurred. Depreciation is provided for on the straight-line method over three to six years. Upon disposition of equipment, the gross cost and accumulated depreciation are written off and the difference between the proceeds and the net book value is recorded as a gain or loss on sale of assets. In the case of certain assets acquired under Capital Leases, the assets are recorded net of imputed interest, based upon the net present value of future payments. Assets under capital lease are pledged as collateral for the related lease.

Deferred Issuance Costs—Payments, either in cash or share-based payments, made in connection with the sale of debentures are recorded as deferred debt issuance costs and amortized using the effective interest method over the lives of the related debentures. The weighted average amortization period for deferred debt issuance costs is 36 months, and as redemptions occur the Company writes off the proportional amount of the original deferred issuance cost to interest expense.

Intangible and Long-Lived Assets—We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which established a “primary asset” approach to determine the cash flow estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that represents the unit of accounting for a long-lived asset to be held and used. Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, no impairment loss was recognized.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—For certain of our financial instruments, including accounts receivable, account payable, accrued expenses, interest payable, bank overdraft, advances payable and notes payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities.

Valuation of Derivative Instruments—FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments and measurement of fair value for accounting purposes. In addition, FAS 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” requires measurement of fair values of hybrid financial instruments for accounting purposes. We applied the accounting proscribed in FAS 155 to account for the 2006 Convertible Debentures described below in Note 3—Convertible Debentures 2006. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses a variety of valuation techniques including Black Scholes models, Binomial Option Pricing models, Standard Put Option Binomial models and net present value of certain penalty amounts. Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives. The effects of interactions between embedded derivatives are calculated and accounted for in arriving at the overall fair value of the financial instruments. In addition, the fair values of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrant derivatives are valued using Black Scholes models.

Revenue Recognition—Our revenues are generated from license and research agreements with collaborators. Licensing revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the life of the license or the estimated economic life of the patents related to the license. Deferred revenue represents the portion of the license and other payments received that has not been earned. Costs associated with the license revenue are deferred and recognized over same term as the revenue. Reimbursements of research expense pursuant to grants are recorded in the period during which collection of the reimbursement becomes assured, because the reimbursements are subject to approval.

Research and Development Costs—Research and development costs consist of expenditures for the research and development of patents and technology, which are not capitalizable. Our research and development costs consist mainly of payroll and payroll related expenses, research supplies and research grants. Reimbursements of research expense pursuant to grants are recorded in the period during which collection of the reimbursement becomes assured, because the reimbursements are subject to approval. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Stock Based Compensation—At March 31, 2007, we had two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the consolidated financial statements for granted, modified or settled stock options based on estimated fair values. Results for prior periods have not been restated, as provided for under the modified prospective transition method.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash inflows in the consolidated statements of cash flows, in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-15, “Classification in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Income Tax Benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a Nonqualified Employee Stock Option.” SFAS 123R requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options to be classified as financing cash inflows rather than operating cash inflows, on a prospective basis. The impact of this change was not material to the Company.

Net Loss Per Share—We use FAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. We compute basic loss per share by dividing net loss and net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential shares had been issued and if the additional shares were dilutive. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of net loss per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, approximately 76,000,000 potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would reduce net loss per share. There were 23,000,000 potentially dilutive shares at March 31, 2006.

Income Taxes—Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statement of income.

Concentrations and Other Risks—Currently, the Company’s revenues and accounts receivable are concentrated on one customer. There is also a geographic concentration of the Company’s primary activities in Northern California and Massachusetts. Other risks include the uncertainty of the regulatory

environment and the effect of future regulations on the Company’s business activities. As we are a biotechnology research and development company, there is also the attendant risk that someone could commence legal proceedings over our discoveries. Acts of God could also adversely affect our business.

FIN 48

Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. We utilize a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. See Note 11 to the accompanying financial statements for information regarding the effects of adopting FIN 48.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On February 15, 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FAS 115.” This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions in FAS 159 are elective; however, an amendment to FAS 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” applies to all entities with available for sale or trading securities. Some requirements apply differently to entities that do not report net income. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of FAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” We will adopt FAS 159 beginning January 1, 2008 and we are currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on our financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FSP No. FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48,” (FSP FIN 48-1), which was issued on May 2, 2007. FSP FIN 48-1 amends FIN 48 to provide guidance on how an entity should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. The term “effectively settled” replaces the term “ultimately settled” when used to describe recognition, and the terms “settlement” or “settled” replace the terms “ultimate settlement” or “ultimately settled” when used to describe measurement of a tax position under FIN 48. FSP FIN 48-1 clarifies that a tax position can be effectively settled upon the completion of an examination by a taxing authority without being legally extinguished. For tax positions considered effectively settled, an entity would recognize the full amount of tax benefit, even if the tax position is not considered more likely than not to be sustained based solely on the basis of its technical merits and the statute of limitations remains open. The adoption of FSP FIN 48-1 did not have an impact on the accompanying Financial Statements.

3. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES—2006

On September 6, 2006, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of an aggregate of $10,981,250 principal amount of convertible debentures with an original issue discount of $2,231,250 representing approximately 20.3%. In connection with the closing of the sale of the debentures, we received gross proceeds of $8,750,000. These convertible debentures were issued in connection with certain additional investment rights granted in connection with the convertible debentures issued in 2005, and described more fully in Note 4—Convertible Debentures—2005. The convertible debentures are convertible at the option of the holders into 38,129,340 shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.288 per share, subject to anti-dilution and other customary adjustments. In

connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, we also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 19,064,670 shares of our Common Stock. The term of the warrants is five years and the exercise price is $0.3168 per share, subject to anti-dilution and other customary adjustments. The investors have contractually agreed to restrict their ability to convert the convertible debentures, exercise the warrants and exercise the additional investment right and receive shares of our Common Stock such that the number of shares of our Common Stock held by them and their affiliates after such conversion or exercise does not exceed 4.99% of our then issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock.

The agreements entered into provide that the Company will pay certain cash amounts as liquidated damages in the event that the Company does not maintain an effective registration statement, or if the Company fails to timely execute stock trading activity.

Under the terms of the agreements, principal amounts owed under the debentures became due and payable commencing six months following closing of the transaction. This term was changed to twelve months under the terms of an amendment signed in January 2007. At that time, and each month thereafter, the Company is required to either repay 1¤30 of the outstanding balance owed in cash, or convert the amount due into common stock at the lesser of $0.288 per share or 70% of the prior ten days’ average closing stock price, immediately preceding the redemption. The agreements also provide that the Company may force conversion of outstanding amounts owed under the debentures into common stock, if the Company has met conditions and milestones identified above, and, additionally, has a stock price for 20 consecutive trading days that exceeds 200% of the conversion price.

The agreement included a number of other embedded derivative instruments, and the Company has complied with the provisions of FAS 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments”, and recorded the fair value of the convertible debentures, and related embedded derivatives, as of September 6, 2006. The fair value of the debentures and related derivative instruments was valued using a combination of Binomial and Black Scholes models, resulting in a fair value of $22,200,000. The excess of this value over the face value of the Convertible Debentures was recorded through the results of operations as a debit to Charges Related to Issuance of Convertible Debentures.

The 2006 Convertible Debentures and related embedded derivatives outstanding at March 31, 2007 were again valued at fair value using a combination of Binomial and Black Scholes models, resulting in an increase in the fair value of the liability of approximately $4,602,000 which was recorded through the results of operations as a debit to Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives.

In connection with this financing, we paid cash fees to a broker-dealer of $525,000 and issued a warrant to purchase 4,575,521 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.3168 per share. The initial fair value of the warrant was estimated at approximately $3,600,000 using the Black Scholes pricing model. The assumptions used in the Black Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 176%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.81%, and (4) expected life of 5 years. Cash fees paid, and the initial fair value of the warrant, have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized over 36 months, and as redemptions occur the Company writes off the proportional amount of the original deferred issuance cost to interest expense.

The following table summarizes the 2006 Convertible Debentures and discounts outstanding at March 31, 2007 (unaudited):

2006 Convertible debentures at fair value	$	21,994,075
Warrant derivative discount	(2,654,552		)
Original issue discount	(1,510,803		)
Net convertible debentures	17,828,720
Less current portion	(4,160,035		)
2006 Convertible debentures and embedded derivatives-long term	$	13,668,685

4. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES—2005

On September 15, 2005, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of an aggregate of $22,276,250 principal amount of convertible debentures with an original issue discount of $4,526,250 representing approximately 20.3%. In connection with the closing of the sale of the debentures, we received gross proceeds of $17,750,000.

The agreement included a number of embedded derivative instruments that required separate valuation in accordance with the requirements of FAS 133, EITF 05-04 and related accounting literature. The following summarizes the fair values of embedded derivatives at December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, followed by a description of the valuation methodology utilized to determine fair values:

Embedded Derivative Liability (Asset)	Fair value December 31, 2006				Fair value March 31, 2007 (unaudited)
Conversion feature		$	1,104,414			$	1,723,458
Anti-dilution protection		2,107,767				544,162
Default provisions		46,692				10,000
Right to provide future financing		0				0
Company right to force conversion		(185,091		)		(407,773		)
		$	3,070,782			$	1,869,907

The fair value of the derivative for the conversion feature was valued as an American call option using the Binomial Option Pricing Model with the following inputs: (1) closing stock price of $0.78 at March 31, 2007 (2) exercise price equal to the $0.90 conversion price (3) volatility based upon the Company’s stock trading of 157% (4) Treasury note rates with terms commensurate with the remaining term of the Notes of 4.71%, and (5) duration of the note as an amortizing debenture of approximately 0.80 years, based upon present values.

The fair value of the derivative for anti-dilution protection was valued using a standard put option binomial model, adjusted for the probability of subsequent financing at prices below the principal’s conversion option with the following inputs: (1) closing stock price as of the valuation date of $0.78 (2) exercise price equal to the $0.90 conversion price (3) volatility based upon the Company’s stock trading of 177% (4) Treasury note rates with terms commensurate with the remaining term of the Notes of 4.58% and (5) duration of the note as an amortizing debenture of approximately 0.66 years based upon present values.

The fair value of the derivative for contractual default provisions was determined by taking the monthly amortization schedule, and multiplying the result by the contractual penalty of 120%. The present value of this penalty was then adjusted by the estimated probability of default for each valuation date.

The fair value of the derivative asset related to the Company’s right to force conversion was based upon a binomial option pricing model with the following inputs: (1) closing stock price at the valuation date of $0.78 (2) exercise price of $1.80 per share which is required for the forced conversion (3) volatility based upon the Company’s stock trading of 173% (4) Treasury note rate with terms commensurate with the remaining term of the Notes of 4.71% and (5) duration of the note as an amortizing debenture of approximately 0.66 years based upon present values.

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, an increase in the fair value of the embedded derivative amounts of approximately $1,200,000 was recorded through results of operations as Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded approximately $3,102,000 as Interest Expense for amortization of discounts for original issue discount, discount for warrant derivative, and other embedded derivatives identified above.

In connection with this financing, we paid cash fees to a broker-dealer of $1,065,000 and issued a warrant to purchase 1,162,239 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.53 per share. The initial fair value of the warrant was estimated at approximately $1,379,000 using the Black Scholes pricing model. The assumptions used in the Black Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 64%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 3.99%, and (4) expected life of 5 years. Cash fees paid, and the initial fair value of the warrant, have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized over 36 months under the effective interest rate method. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $914,000.

In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors agreed to reduce the exercise price of the warrants issued in connection with the 2005 debentures to $0.95 per share and to reduce the conversion price of the debentures to $0.90 per share.

The Company has considered the impact of Emerging Issue Task Force statements, or EITFs 96-19—Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments, 02-4—Determining Whether a Debtor’s Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments is Within the Scope of FASB No. 15, and 05-7—Accounting for Modifications to conversion Options Embedded in Debt Instruments and Related Issues on the accounting treatment of the change in conversion price of the 2005 Convertible Debentures described in the paragraph above. EITF 96-19 states that a transaction resulting in a significant change in the nature of a debt instrument should be accounted for as an extinguishment of debt. The Company has concluded that the change in conversion price does not constitute a significant change in the nature of the debt and that the transaction should not be treated as an extinguishment of that debt.

The following table summarizes the 2005 Convertible Debentures and embedded derivatives outstanding at March 31, 2007:

2005 Convertible debentures at $0.90 at face	$	5,751,836
Discounts on debentures:
Original issue discount	(540,184		)
Conversion feature derivative	(900,966		)
Warrant derivative	(707,470		)
Other derivatives	(34,402)
Net convertible debentures	3,568,814
Embedded derivatives	1,869,907
2005 Convertible debentures and embedded derivatives	5,438,721
Less current portion	(4,485,754		)
2005 Convertible debentures and embedded derivatives—long term	$	952,967

5. WARRANT AND OPTION DERIVATIVES

As described more fully in Note 4—Convertible Debentures—2005, the provisions of our convertible debenture financing completed in September 2005 permit the Company to make its monthly redemption in shares rather than cash upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Under the terms of the debenture agreement, the price per share is variable dependent upon the actual closing price of the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the total number of shares to retire outstanding principal is variable and the Company can not be assured that there are adequate authorized shares to settle all contractual obligations under the debenture agreement, and other option and warrant agreements outstanding.

Accordingly, in accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in a Company’s Own Stock” the Company has reviewed all instruments previously recorded as permanent equity under EITF 00-19 which are described in detail in Note 8—Stockholders’ Equity Transactions. As of September 15, 2005, the closing date of the convertible debenture financing, a $25,600,000 increase in the fair value of instruments previously recorded as permanent equity with a value of zero was recorded based upon fair values computed under a Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0% (2) expected volatility of 64% (3) risk-free interest rate of approximately 3.9% and (4) expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument.

The accumulated fair value of these and other instruments at September 15, 2005 of approximately $27,700,000, after the increase to fair value described above, was reclassified from equity to Warrant Derivative liability in accordance with the requirements of EITF 00-19.

At March 31, 2007 the fair value of each instrument was computed under a Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0% (2) expected volatility of 173% (3) risk-free interest rate of approximately 4.8% and (4) expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument. These calculations resulted in an aggregate value of derivative instruments of approximately $20,696,000. As a result, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 the Company recorded approximately $5,200,000 as a debit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

The carrying value of the remaining 2005 debenture warrant derivatives at March 31, 2007 has been adjusted to reflect “fair value” of approximately $1,500,000 based upon a Black Scholes calculation as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 157%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.54%, and (4) expected remaining life of 3.25 years. This resulted in an additional decrease in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $390,000 which was recorded through results of operations as a credit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

The carrying value of the replacement warrant derivatives at March 31, 2007 has been adjusted to reflect “fair value” of approximately $3,200,000 based upon a Black Scholes calculation as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 157%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.54%, and (4) expected remaining life of 4.5 years. This resulted in an increase in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $876,000 which was recorded as a debit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives in the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

The carrying value of the January 2005 financing warrant derivatives at March 31, 2007 has been adjusted to reflect fair value of approximately $2,796,000 based upon a Black Scholes calculation as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 157%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.58%, and (4) expected remaining life of 2.00 years. This resulted in an additional increase in the fair value of the

warrant derivative liability of approximately $680,000 which was recorded through results of operations as a credit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

The carrying value of the broker dealer warrant derivatives at March 31, 2007 has been adjusted to reflect fair value of approximately $3,379,000 based upon a Black Scholes calculation as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 157%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.54%, and (4) expected remaining life of 4.50 years. This resulted in a decrease in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $859,000 which was recorded through results of operations as a credit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

6. ADJUSTMENT TO FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES

The following table summarizes the components of the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives, explained in more detail above in Notes 3, 4, and 5, which were recorded as charges to results of operations in the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The table summarizes by category of derivative liability the impact from market changes during the quarter and the impact of repricing certain warrants and debentures.

	Impact of
	Repricing		“Market”		Total F.V.
	01.11.07		F.V. Adj		Adjustment
PIPE Hybrid instrument 9.06	0		3,753,485			3,753,485
Embedded PIPE derivatives 9.05	1,216,734		(402,445	)		814,289
Original Warrants PIPE 9.05, not including Replacement Warrants	(373,457	)	763,644			390,187
Other Warrant derivatives			4,804,447			4,804,447
	843,277		8,919,131			9,762,408

7. RECLASSIFICATION OF EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

As described more fully in Note 4—Convertible Debentures 2005, the provisions of our convertible debenture financing completed in September 2005 permit the Company to make its monthly redemption in shares rather than cash upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Under the terms of the debenture agreement, the price per share is variable dependent upon the actual closing price of the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the total number of shares to retire outstanding principal is variable and the Company can not be assured that there are adequate authorized shares to settle all contractual obligations under the debenture agreement, and other option and warrant agreements outstanding.

8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

We are authorized to issue two classes of capital stock, to be designated, respectively, Preferred Stock and Common Stock. The total number of shares of Preferred Stock we are authorized to issue is 50,000,000

par value $0.001 per share. The total number of shares of Common Stock we are authorized to issue is 500,000,000, par value $0.001 per share. We had no Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2007. We had 48,969,882 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2007.

In February, 2007 the Company issued 300,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $0.96 per share in connection with consulting services provided during the quarter. The warrants were valued at approximately $225,000 using the Black Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 165%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.90%, and (4) expected life of 4.0 years. This warrant is classified as a warrant derivative.

In January 2007, the Company issued 35,909 fully vested shares of Common Stock as consideration for service on the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee. These shares are valued at market price on date of grant.

In January 2007, the Company issued 515,000 shares of Common Stock, valued at $407,000, to employees. These shares are fully vested at issuance and are valued at fair market price on date of grant.

In February 2007, the Company issued 800,000 shares of Common Stock, valued at $608,000 based upon the closing price per share on the date of issuance, to Infigen, Inc. in connection with the execution of a Patent Assignment Agreement. The Company recorded the $608,000 as deferred royalty fees and will amortize this amount over an estimated life of 10 years.

9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Plans

On August 12, 2004, ACT’s Board of Directors approved the establishment of the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Stock Plan”). Stockholder approval was received on December 13, 2004. The total number of common shares available for grant and issuance under the plan may not exceed 2,800,000 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations, reorganizations and similar transactions. Common stock purchase options may be exercisable by the payment of cash or by other means as authorized by the Board of Directors or a committee established by the Board of Directors. At September 30, 2006, ACT had granted 2,604,000 common share purchase options under the plan.

On December 13, 2004, ACT’s Board of Directors and stockholders approved the establishment of the 2004 Stock Option Plan II (the “2004 Stock Plan II”). The total number of common shares available for grant and issuance under the plan may not exceed 1,301,161 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations, reorganizations and similar transactions. Common stock purchase options may be exercisable by the payment of cash or by other means as authorized by the Board of Directors or a committee established by the Board of Directors.

On January 31, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the establishment of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), subject to approval of our shareholders. The total number of common shares available for grant and issuance under the plan may not exceed 9 million shares, plus an annual increase on the first day of each of the Company’s fiscal years beginning in 2006 equal to 5% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations, reorganizations and similar transactions. Common stock purchase options may be exercisable by the payment of cash or by other means as authorized by the Board of Directors or a committee established by the Board of Directors.

Pursuant to the 2005 Plan, on February 5, 2007, we granted 1,300,000 common stock purchase options to employees. The options granted have an exercise price of $0.76 per share, the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The options vest monthly over a period of 4 years. The fair value of the options was estimated at $953,000 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used in the Black Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 163%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.80%, and (4) expected life of 6.25 years. The fair value was treated in accordance with FAS 123(R) and is being amortized over a period of four years. Since the Company vests options on the graded method, the fair value is amortized on a straight line basis which approximates the vesting schedule.

The assumptions used in the Black Scholes models referred to above are based upon the following data: (1) Expected dividends on the underlying shares over the remaining term of the option are based upon historical dividend data (2) The expected volatility of the price of the underlying shares over the expected term of the option is based upon historical share price data (3) The expected term of the option is estimated by considering the contractual term of the option and the vesting period of the option.

										Weighted
	Shares		Exercise		Average		Weighted			Aggregate	Aggregate
	Available		Stock Options		Price Per		Exercise			Average	Intrinsic
	For Grant		Outstanding		Share		Price			Life	Value
Balance at December 31, 2006	478,137			13,656,976	$	0.05-$2.48		$	0.71	8.2 years
Annual increase pursuant to plan	1,965,963			—	—			—		—
Options granted	(1,300,000	)		1,300,000	$	0.76		$	0.76	9.8 years
Stock awards	(515,000	)			$	—		$	—
Balance at March 31, 2007	629,100			14,956,976	$	0.05-$2.48		$	0.74	8.2 years	2,600,000

Aggregate option activity for the 2004 and 2005 stock option plans is as follows:

As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were 8,152,896 and 7,503,665 exercisable options outstanding at a weighted average exercise price per share of $0.74 and $0.61, respectively, and with a weighted average life of 8.40 years and 8.40 years respectively.

During the period, no options were forfeited or exercised. The aggregate intrinsic value of all options vested is approximately $2.0 million. All fully vested options in the Company are exercisable.

The fair value of all options vested during the year ended December 2006 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $522,516 and $187,606 respectively.

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, a charge of approximately $53,000 and $142,000 respectively was recorded through results of operations as General and Administrative and Research and Development expense related to share based compensation. These amounts were calculated using a pre-vesting forfeiture rate of 13%, based on historical employee turnover and forfeiture data.

A summary of the status of unvested employee stock options as of March 31, 2007 and changes during the period then ended, is presented below:

	Options		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Unvested at December 31, 2006	3,416,398			$	0.22
Granted	1,300,000			$	0.69
Vested	(649,231	)		$	0.30
Unvested at March 31, 2007	4,067,167			$	0.37

As of March 31, 2007, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options amounted to $1.0 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 4.0 years.

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are a party to a license agreement with the University of Massachusetts, as amended from time to time (the “UMass License”). Under the UMass License, we were granted certain exclusive rights to license and sublicense certain products and services invented as part of the collaborative effort. The term of the UMass License extends to the later of the expiration of the related patents currently 2021, or April 16, 2006. We are required to pay royalties ranging from 2.5% to 4.5% of net sales of licensed products and services, as defined. Minimum royalties of $45,000 per year must be paid to UMass. For 2007 and 2006, we have paid only the minimum royalty required. Additionally, we are required to pay sublicense fees of 18% for sublicense income, as defined. We are required to spend a minimum annual amount of $200,000 on research and development.

In May 2006 we entered into exclusive and non-exclusive sublicense agreements with a company whereby we are the licensee of certain of its technology and intellectual property for a cash payment of $300,000. The agreement requires we pay minimum annual royalties of $25,000 per annum for 2006, $37,500 for 2007 and $50,000 each year thereafter through the term of the agreement. The initial license fees paid have been capitalized and will be amortized over the life of the underlying intellectual property, estimated to be approximately ten years.

In March 2006 we entered into an exclusive sublicense agreement with TranXenoGen, Inc. whereby we are the exclusive licensee of certain of TranXenoGen’s technology and intellectual property. Pursuant to this agreement we issued 163,399 shares of common stock with a fair value of approximately $239,000 and made a cash payment during the quarter of $140,000. We had previously paid $20,000 as an option payment related to the TranXenoGen technology. The total value paid for this license agreement of $399,000 has been capitalized and will be amortized over the life of the underlying intellectual property, estimated to be approximately seven years.

During 2004, we entered into license agreements with two parties, the terms of which provide for the initial payment of the license fee through an aggregate of six promissory notes totaling $1,400,000. The notes mature as follows: $333,333 on December 1, 2005; $666,667 on December 1, 2006; and $400,000 on June 1, 2007. There is no stated interest rate for $1,000,000 of notes, the remaining $400,000 bear interest at 10% per year, but only if the notes are not paid at maturity. Because of the uncertainty of the ultimate collection of the principal amount of the notes, they have not been recorded in the financial statements and will not be recorded until their collectibility is reasonably assured.

The Company entered into a lease for office and laboratory space in Massachusetts commencing December 2004 and expiring April 2010 and for office space in California commencing November 2005 and expiring May 2008. Annual minimum lease payments are as follows:

1 year		$574,450
2 years		299,779
3 years		247,158
4 years		20,850

During 2005, the Company entered into a lease for laboratory equipment commencing November 29, 2005 and expiring May 31, 2008. Annual minimum lease payments are as follows:

2007	65,940
2008	36,655
	102,595
Imputed interest	(12,520		)
Net asset value	90,075
Less current portion	(77,594		)
Long-term commitment under capital lease	$	12,481

Rent expense recorded in the financial statements for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $328,000 and $326,000, respectively.

We have entered into employment contracts with certain executives and research personnel. The contracts provide for salaries, bonuses and stock option grants, along with other employee benefits. The employment contracts generally have no set term and can be terminated by either party. There is a provision for payments of three months to one year of annual salary as severance if we terminate a contract without cause, along with the acceleration of certain unvested stock option grants.

11. INCOME TAXES

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Due to the fact that the Company has substantial net operating loss carryforwards, adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the Company’s beginning retained earnings, balance sheets, or statements of operations.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2007 and 2006. As a result, the Company did not recognize interest expense, and additionally, did not record any penalties during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company does not expect that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months.

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In April 2007, the Company made its monthly redemptions of convertible debentures described in Note 6. The terms of the agreement provide for payment in cash, or company stock under certain circumstances. In connection with the April redemptions, the Company issued approximately 779,682 shares of common stock and redeemed approximately $514,590 in Notes Payable.

In May 2007, the Company made its monthly redemptions of convertible debentures described in Note 6. In connection with the May redemptions, the Company issued approximately 832,085 shares of common stock and redeemed approximately $502,572 in Notes Payable.

At March 31, 2007, approximately 109,970 of the shares related to the April redemption had been preliminarily issued by the transfer agent in accordance with the terms of the debenture agreement. Such shares are not reflected as issued and outstanding by the company prior to finalizing share and cash payments in connection with the redemption in April 2007.

In April 2007, the Company executed a settlement agreement with certain of its creditors to settle outstanding accounts payable of $170,249, accrued interest of $10,833 and late fees of $65,000. The settlement resulted in a gain of approximately $128,000 and will be accounted for as a gain on settlement of debt in April 2007.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

OVERVIEW

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We use words such as “may,” “assumes,” “forecasts,” “positions,” “predicts,” “strategy,” “will,” “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “budgets,” “potential,” “continue” and variations thereof, and other statements contained in quarterly report, and the exhibits hereto, regarding matters that are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements. Because these statements involve risks and uncertainties, as well as certain assumptions, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to risks inherent in: our early stage of development, including a lack of operating history, lack of profitable operations and the need for additional capital; the development and commercialization of largely novel and unproven technologies and products; our ability to protect, maintain, and defend our intellectual property rights: uncertainties regarding our ability to obtain the capital resources needed to continue research and development operations and to conduct research, preclinical development and clinical trials necessary for regulatory approvals; uncertainty regarding the outcome of clinical trials and our overall ability to compete effectively in a highly complex, rapidly developing, capital intensive and competitive industry. See “RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS” set forth below on page 26 for a more complete discussion of these factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB.

We are a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing human stem cell technology in the emerging fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-KSB.

Principles of Consolidation—The accounts of the Company and ACT are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the period from January 1, 2005 to November 18, 2005, when the shareholders approved the roll-up merger to combine the two companies. During the period from January 1, 2005 to November 18, 2005, all intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications—Certain prior year financial statement balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the recorded net loss.

Deferred Issuance Costs—Payments, either in cash or share-based payments, made in connection with the sale of debentures are recorded as deferred debt issuance costs and amortized using the effective interest method over the lives of the related debentures. The weighted average amortization period for deferred debt issuance costs is 36 months.

Stock Based Compensation—At March 31, 2007, we had two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation.

Prior to the January 1, 2006 adoption of the FAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. Because the stock option grant price equaled the market price on the date of grant, no compensation expense was recognized by the Company for stock-based compensation. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) stock-based compensation was included as a pro forma disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, 76,941,797 potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would reduce net loss per share. There were 40,104,105 potentially dilutive shares at December 31, 2005.

Concentrations and Other Risk—Currently, the Company’s revenues and accounts receivable are concentrated on one customer. There is also a geographic concentration of the Company’s primary activities in Northern California and Massachusetts. Other risks include the uncertainty of the regulatory environment and the effect of future regulations on the Company’s business activities. As we are a biotechnology research and development company, there is also the attendant risk that someone could commence legal proceedings over our discoveries. Acts of God could also adversely affect our business.

Income Taxes—Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet or a reduction in deferred tax amounts along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statement of income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On February 15, 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FAS 115.” This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions in FAS 159 are elective; however, an amendment to FAS 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” applies to all entities with available for sale or trading securities. Some requirements apply differently to entity’s that do not report net income. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entities first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of FAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” We will adopt FAS 159 beginning January 1, 2008 and we are currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on our financial statements.

replace the terms “ultimate settlement” or “ultimately settled” when used to describe measurement of a tax position under FIN 48. FSP FIN 48-1 clarifies that a tax position can be effectively settled upon the completion of an examination by a taxing authority without being legally extinguished. For tax positions considered effectively settled, an entity would recognize the full amount of tax benefit, even if the tax position is not considered more likely than not to be sustained based solely on the basis of its technical merits and the statute of limitations remains open. The adoption of FSP FIN 48-1 did not have an impact on the accompanying Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended March, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $124,000 and $83,000 respectively. These amounts relate primarily to license fees and royalties collected that are being amortized over the period of the license granted. The increase in revenue in current periods was due to new licenses being granted.

Research and Development Expenses and Grant Reimbursements

Research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $3,649,000 and $1,809,000 respectively. The increase in expenses in the current periods, which consist mainly of facility costs, payroll and payroll related expenses, research supplies and costs incurred in connection with specific research grants, relate principally to increased staffing and spending for scientific research.

Our research and development expenses consist primarily of costs associated with basic and pre-clinical research exclusively in the field of human stem cell therapies and regenerative medicine, with focus on development of our technologies in cellular reprogramming, reduced complexity applications, and stem cell differentiation. These expenses represent both pre-clinical development costs and costs associated with non-clinical support activities such as quality control and regulatory processes. The cost of our research and development personnel is the most significant category of expense; however, we also incur expenses with third parties, including license agreements, sponsored research programs and consulting expenses.

We do not segregate research and development costs by project because our research is focused exclusively on human stem cell therapies as a unitary field of study. Although we have three principal areas of focus for our research, these areas are completely intertwined and have not yet matured to the point where they are separate and distinct projects. The intellectual property, scientists and other resources dedicated to these efforts are not separately allocated to individual projects, but rather are conducting our research on an integrated basis.

We expect that research and development expenses will continue to increase in the foreseeable future as we add personnel, expand our pre-clinical research, begin clinical trial activities, and increase our regulatory compliance capabilities. The amount of these increases is difficult to predict due to the uncertainty inherent in the timing and extent of progress in our research programs, and initiation of clinical trials. In addition, the results from our basic research and pre-clinical trials, as well as the results of trials of similar therapeutics under development by others, will influence the number, size and duration of planned and unplanned trials. As our research efforts mature, we will continue to review the direction of our research based on an assessment of the value of possible commercial applications emerging from these efforts. Based on this continuing review, we expect to establish discrete research programs and evaluate the cost and potential for cash inflows from commercializing products, partnering with others in the biotechnology or pharmaceutical industry, or licensing the technologies associated with these programs to third parties.

We believe that it is not possible at this stage to provide a meaningful estimate of the total cost to complete our ongoing projects and bring any proposed products to market. The use of human embryonic stem cells as a therapy is an emerging area of medicine, and it is not known what clinical trials will be required by the FDA in order to gain marketing approval. Costs to complete could vary substantially depending upon the projects selected for development, the number of clinical trials required and the number of patients needed for each study. It is possible that the completion of these studies could be delayed for a variety of reasons, including difficulties in enrolling patients, delays in manufacturing, incomplete or inconsistent data from the pre-clinical or clinical trials, and difficulties evaluating the trial results. Any delay in completion of a trial would increase the cost of that trial, which would harm our results of operations. Due to these uncertainties, we cannot reasonably estimate the size, nature nor timing of the costs to complete, or the amount or timing of the net cash inflows from our current activities. Until we obtain further relevant pre-clinical and clinical data, we will not be able to estimate our future expenses related to these programs or when, if ever, and to what extent we will receive cash inflows from resulting products.

Grant reimbursements for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $58,000 and $201,000, respectively. The 2006 amounts represent approved reimbursements pursuant to the grant from National Institutes of Science and Technology. This grant expired in May 2006. The 2007 to grant amount is from the Small Business Technology Transfer Program.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $1,741,000 and $2,630,000 respectively. The principal increase in expense in the three month period versus the same period last year is a result of additional salary costs related to the addition of key personnel and approximately $600,000 of costs incurred by the Company for investor relations related expenses during the current period. Expenses for the three month period versus the same period last year have decreased primarily as a result of decreased general and administrative infrastructure costs and legal fees.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $(14,662,000) and $9,029,000 , respectively. The increase in other expense in the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to other income in the prior periods, relates primarily to adjustments to fair value of derivatives related to the Convertible Debenture financing and the Charges related to issuance of Convertible Debentures. The increase in interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to interest expense in the prior periods relates primarily to interest recorded in connection with the convertible debentures.

Net Income (Loss)

Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately ($19,931,000) and $4,813,000, respectively. The increase in loss in the current period is the result of changes to the fair value of derivatives, interest charges related to convertible debentures and charges related to issuance of Convertible Debentures along with increased general and administrative and research and development expenses, as well as decreased grant reimbursements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We are financing our operations primarily with $8,750,000 of proceeds of convertible debentures issued in September, 2006 and described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and above in Note 3—Convertible Debentures 2006, and $4,314,588 of proceeds from warrant exercises as described above in Note 5—Warrant and Option Derivatives. To a substantially lesser degree, financing of our operations is provided through grant funding, payments received under license agreements, and interest earned on cash and cash equivalents.

With the exception of 2002, when we sold certain assets of a subsidiary resulting in a gain for the year, we have incurred substantial net losses each year since inception as a result of research and development and general and administrative expenses in support of our operations. We anticipate incurring substantial net losses in the future.

Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were approximately $3,747,000 and $8,689,000, respectively. The decrease in the current period is primarily the result of operational cash expenditures.

Our cash and cash equivalents are limited. We expect to require substantial additional funding. Our future cash requirements will depend on many factors, including the pace and scope of our research and development programs, the costs involved in filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patents and other costs associated with commercializing our potential products. We intend to seek additional funding primarily through public or private financing transactions, and, to a lesser degree, new licensing or scientific collaborations, grants from governmental or other institutions, and other related transactions. If we are unable to raise additional funds, we will be forced to either scale back our business efforts or curtail our business activities entirely. We anticipate that our available cash and expected income will be sufficient to finance most of our current activities for at least twelve months from the date of the financial statements, although certain of these activities and related personnel may need to be reduced. We cannot assure you that public or private financing or grants will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Several factors will affect our ability to raise additional funding, including, but not limited to, the volatility of our Common Stock.

RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS

Our business is subject to various risks, included but not limited to those described below. You should carefully consider these factors, together with all the other information disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB. Any of these risks could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Risks Relating to Our Early Stage of Development

We have a limited operating history on which potential investors may evaluate our operations and prospects for profitable operations. We have a limited operating history on which a potential investor may base an evaluation of us and our prospects. If we are unable to begin and sustain profitable operations, investors may lose their entire investment in us. We are in the pre-clinical stage, and our prospects must be considered speculative in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of development, particularly in light of the uncertainties relating to the new, competitive and rapidly evolving markets in which we anticipate we will operate. To attempt to address these risks, we must, among other things, further develop our technologies, products and services, successfully implement our research, development, marketing and commercialization strategies, respond to competitive developments and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. A substantial risk is involved in investing in us because, as an early stage company,

· we have fewer resources than an established company,

· our management may be more likely to make mistakes at such an early stage, and

· we may be more vulnerable operationally and financially to any mistakes that may be made, as well as to external factors beyond our control.

These difficulties are compounded by our heavy dependence on emerging and sometimes unproven technologies. In addition, some of our significant potential revenue sources involve ethically sensitive and controversial issues which could become the subject of legislation or regulations that could materially restrict our operations and, therefore, harm our financial condition, operating results and prospects for bringing our investors a return on their investment.

We have a history of operating losses, and we cannot assure you that we will achieve future revenues or operating profits. We have generated modest revenue to date from our operations. Historically, we have had net operating losses each year since our inception. We have limited current potential sources of revenue from license fees and product development revenues, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to develop such revenue sources or that our operations will become profitable, even if we are able to commercialize our technologies or any products or services developed from those technologies. If we continue to suffer losses as we have in the past, investors may not receive any return on their investment and may lose their entire investment.

Although we have revenues from license fees and royalties, we have no commercially marketable products and no immediate ability to generate revenue from commercial products, nor any assurance of being able to develop our technologies for commercial applications. As a result, we may never be able to operate profitably. We are just beginning to identify products available for pre-clinical trials and may not receive significant revenues from commercial sales of our products for the next several years, if at all, although we do generate revenues from licensing activities. We have marketed only a limited amount of services based on our technologies and have little experience in doing so. Our technologies and any potential products or services that we may develop will require significant additional effort and investment prior to material commercialization and, in the case of any biomedical products, pre-clinical and clinical testing and regulatory approvals. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop any such technologies or any products or services, or that such technologies, products or services will prove to be safe and efficacious in clinical trials, meet applicable regulatory standards, be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at acceptable costs or be successfully marketed. For that reason, we may not be able to generate revenues from commercial production or operate profitably.

We have sold the agricultural portion of our business in order to finance operations. The agricultural applications of our technology generally have a more rapid realization of revenues due to more limited regulatory requirements and testing. Our ability to generate revenue from any agricultural applications of our technology is limited to existing license royalties, if any.

We will require substantial additional funds to continue operating which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. We have losses from operations, negative cash flows from operations and a substantial stockholders’ deficit that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. We do not believe that our cash from all sources, including cash, cash equivalents and anticipated revenue stream from licensing fees and sponsored research contracts is sufficient for us to continue operations beyond March 15, 2008 without raising additional financing.

Management continues to evaluate alternatives and sources for additional funding, which may include public or private investors, strategic partners, and grant programs available through specific states or foundations, although there is no assurance that such sources will result in raising additional capital. Lack of necessary funds may require us to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our research and product development programs and/or our capital expenditures, to license our potential products or technologies

to third parties, to consider business combinations related to ongoing business operations, or shut down some, or all, of our operations.

In addition, our cash requirements may vary materially from those now planned because of results of research and development, potential relationships with strategic partners, changes in the focus and direction of our research and development programs, competition, litigation required to protect our technology, technological advances, the cost of pre-clinical and clinical testing, the regulatory process of the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and foreign regulators, whether any of our products become approved or the market acceptance of any such products and other factors. Our current cash reserves are not sufficient to fund our operations through the commercialization of our first products or services.

We have limited clinical testing, regulatory, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and sales capabilities which may limit our ability to generate revenues. Because of the relatively early stage of our research and development programs, we have not yet invested significantly in clinical testing, regulatory, manufacturing, or in marketing, distribution or product sales resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop any such resources successfully or as quickly as may be necessary. The inability to do so may harm our ability to generate revenues or operate profitably.

Risks Relating to Competition

Our competition includes both public and private organizations and collaborations among academic institutions and large pharmaceutical companies, most of which have significantly greater experience and financial resources than we do. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by intense competition. We compete against numerous companies, both domestic and foreign, many of which have substantially greater experience and financial and other resources than we have. Several such enterprises have initiated cell therapy research programs and/or efforts to treat the same diseases targeted by us. Companies such as Geron Corporation, Genzyme Corporation, StemCells, Inc., Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. and Viacell, Inc., as well as others, many of which have substantially greater resources and experience in our fields than we do, are well situated to effectively compete with us. Any of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies represents a significant actual or potential competitor with vastly greater resources than ours.

These companies hold licenses to genetic selection technologies and other technologies that are competitive with our technologies. These and other competitive enterprises have devoted, and will continue to devote, substantial resources to the development of technologies and products in competition with us.

Private and public academic and research institutions also compete with us in the research and development of human therapeutic or agricultural products. In the past several years, the pharmaceutical industry has selectively entered into collaborations with both public and private organizations to explore the possibilities that stem cell therapies may present for substantive breakthroughs in the fight against disease.

In addition, many of our competitors have significantly greater experience than we have in the development, pre-clinical testing and human clinical trials of biotechnology and pharmaceutical products, in obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of such products and in manufacturing and marketing such products. Accordingly our competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval for products more rapidly or effectively than we can. Our competitors may also be the first to discover and obtain a valid patent to a particular stem cell which may effectively block all others from doing so. It will be important for us or our collaborators to be the first to discover any stem cell that we are seeking to discover. Failure to be the first could prevent us from commercializing all of our research and development affected by that discovery. Additionally, if we commence commercial sales of any products, we will also be competing with

respect to manufacturing efficiency and sales and marketing capabilities, areas in which we have no experience.

The United States is encountering tremendous competition from many foreign countries that are providing an environment more attractive for stem cell research. The governments of numerous foreign countries are investing in stem cell research, providing facilities, personnel and legal environments intended to attract biotechnology companies and encourage stem cell research and development of stem cell-related technologies.

These efforts by foreign countries may make it more difficult to effectively compete in our industry and may generate competitors with substantially greater resources than ours.

Risks Relating to Our Technology

We rely on nuclear transfer and embryonic stem cell technologies that we may not be able to successfully develop, which will prevent us from generating revenues, operating profitably or providing investors any return on their investment. We have concentrated our research on our nuclear transfer and embryonic stem cell technologies, and our ability to operate profitably will depend on being able to successfully develop these technologies for human applications. These are emerging technologies with, as yet, limited human applications. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully develop our nuclear transfer and embryonic stem cell technologies or that such development will result in products or services with any significant commercial utility. We anticipate that the commercial sale of such products or services, and royalty/licensing fees related to our technology, would be our primary sources of revenues. If we are unable to develop our technologies, investors will likely lose their entire investment in us.

The outcome of pre-clinical, clinical and product testing of our products is uncertain, and if we are unable to satisfactorily complete such testing, or if such testing yields unsatisfactory results, we will be unable to commercially produce our proposed products. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any potential human products, our products will be subjected to extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing to demonstrate their safety and efficacy in humans. We cannot assure you that the clinical trials of our products, or those of our licensees or collaborators, will demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such products at all, or to the extent necessary to obtain appropriate regulatory approvals, or that the testing of such products will be completed in a timely manner, if at all, or without significant increases in costs, program delays or both, all of which could harm our ability to generate revenues. In addition, our prospective products may not prove to be more effective for treating disease or injury than current therapies. Accordingly, we may have to delay or abandon efforts to research, develop or obtain regulatory approval to market our prospective products. Many companies involved in biotechnology research and development have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after promising results in earlier trials. The failure to adequately demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a therapeutic product under development could delay or prevent regulatory approval of the product and could harm our ability to generate revenues, operate profitably or produce any return on an investment in us.

While the marketing of cloned or transgenic animals does not currently require regulatory approval, such approval may be required in the future. We cannot assure you that we would obtain such approvals or that our licensees’ products would be accepted in the marketplace. This lack of approval could reduce or preclude any royalty revenues we might receive from our licensees in that field.

We may not be able to commercially develop our technologies and proposed product lines, which, in turn, would significantly harm our ability to earn revenues and result in a loss of investment. Our ability to commercially develop our technologies will be dictated in large part by forces outside our control which cannot be predicted, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, the success of our research and pre-clinical and field testing, the availability of collaborative partners to finance our work in pursuing applications of nuclear transfer technology and technological or other developments in the biomedical field which, due to efficiencies, technological breakthroughs or greater acceptance in the biomedical industry, may render one or more areas of commercialization more attractive, obsolete or competitively unattractive. It is possible that one or more areas of commercialization will not be pursued at all if a collaborative partner or entity willing to fund research and development cannot be located. Our decisions regarding the ultimate products and/or services we pursue could have a significant adverse affect on our ability to earn revenue if we misinterpret trends, underestimate development costs and/or pursue wrong products or services. Any of these factors either alone or in concert could materially harm our ability to earn revenues and could result in a loss of any investment in us.

If we are unable to keep up with rapid technological changes in our field or compete effectively, we will be unable to operate profitably. We are engaged in activities in the biotechnology field, which is characterized by extensive research efforts and rapid technological progress. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments, our ability to operate profitably could suffer. We cannot assure you that research and discoveries by other biotechnology, agricultural, pharmaceutical or other companies will not render our technologies or potential products or services uneconomical or result in products superior to those we develop or that any technologies, products or services we develop will be preferred to any existing or newly-developed technologies, products or services.

We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology, which could harm our ability to operate profitably. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries place considerable importance on obtaining patent and trade secret protection for new technologies, products and processes. Our success will depend, to a substantial degree, on our ability to obtain and enforce patent protection for our products, preserve any trade secrets and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We cannot assure you that:

· we will succeed in obtaining any patents in a timely manner or at all, or that the breadth or degree of protection of any such patents will protect our interests,

· the use of our technology will not infringe on the proprietary rights of others,

· patent applications relating to our potential products or technologies will result in the issuance of any patents or that, if issued, such patents will afford adequate protection to us or not be challenged invalidated or infringed, and

· patents will not issue to other parties, which may be infringed by our potential products or technologies.

We are aware of certain patents that have been granted to others and certain patent applications that have been filed by others with respect to nuclear transfer technologies. The fields in which we operate have been characterized by significant efforts by competitors to establish dominant or blocking patent rights to gain a competitive advantage, and by considerable differences of opinion as to the value and legal legitimacy of competitors’ purported patent rights and the technologies they actually utilize in their businesses.

Our business is highly dependent upon maintaining licenses with respect to key technology. Several of the key patents we utilize are licensed to us by third parties. These licenses are subject to termination under certain circumstances (including, for example, our failure to make minimum royalty payments or to timely achieve development and commercialization benchmarks). The loss of any of such licenses, or the

conversion of such licenses to non-exclusive licenses, could harm our operations and/or enhance the prospects of our competitors.

Certain of these licenses also contain restrictions, such as limitations on our ability to grant sublicenses that could materially interfere with our ability to generate revenue through the licensing or sale to third parties of important and valuable technologies that we have, for strategic reasons, elected not to pursue directly. The possibility exists that in the future we will require further licenses to complete and/or commercialize our proposed products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire any such licenses on a commercially viable basis.

We may not be able to adequately protect against piracy of intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions. Considerable research in the areas of stem cells, cell therapeutics and regenerative medicine is being performed in countries outside of the United States, and a number of our competitors are located in those countries. The laws protecting intellectual property in some of those countries may not provide protection for our trade secrets and intellectual property adequate to prevent our competitors from misappropriating our trade secrets or intellectual property. If our trade secrets or intellectual property are misappropriated in those countries, we may be without adequate remedies to address the issue.

Certain of our technology is not protectable by patent. Certain parts of our know-how and technology are not patentable. To protect our proprietary position in such know-how and technology, we intend to require all employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality and invention ownership agreements with us. We cannot assure you, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure. Further, in the absence of patent protection, competitors who independently develop substantially equivalent technology may harm our business.

Patent litigation presents an ongoing threat to our business with respect to both outcomes and costs. We have previously been involved in patent interference litigation, and it is possible that further litigation over patent matters with one or more competitors could arise. We could incur substantial litigation or interference costs in defending ourselves against suits brought against us or in suits in which we may assert our patents against others. If the outcome of any such litigation is unfavorable, our business could be materially adversely affected. To determine the priority of inventions, we may also have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which could result in substantial cost to us. Without additional capital, we may not have the resources to adequately defend or pursue this litigation.

Risks Relating to the September 2005 and September 2006 Financings

If we are required for any reason to repay our outstanding debentures we would be required to deplete our working capital, if available, or raise additional funds. Our failure to repay the convertible debentures, if required, could result in legal action against us, which could require the sale of substantial assets. We have outstanding, as of December 31, 2006, $23,505,214 aggregate original principal amount of convertible debentures with an original issue discount of 20.3187% with $10,824,375 in 2006 Debentures and $12,680,839 in 2005 Debentures. We are required to redeem on a monthly basis, by payment with cash or with shares of our common stock, 1/30th of the aggregate original principal amount of the debentures. Unless waived by the holders of the debentures, in order to redeem with shares of our common stock we must satisfy certain conditions which have yet to be satisfied, including such conditions as the listing of our shares of common stock on either the NASDAQ National Market, the NASDAQ Small Cap Market, or the American Stock Exchange. These monthly payments will impact the amount of working capital available to us.

The 2005 Debentures are due and payable on September 14, 2008, unless sooner converted into shares of our common stock, and the 2006 Debentures are due and payable on February 28, 2010, unless sooner converted into shares of our common stock. Any event of default could require the early repayment of the convertible debentures, including the accruing of interest on the outstanding principal balance of the debentures if the default is not cured with the specified grace period. We anticipate that the full amount of the convertible debentures will be converted into shares of our common stock, in accordance with the terms of the convertible debentures. If, prior to the maturity date, we are required to repay the convertible debentures in full, we would be required to use our limited working capital and raise additional funds. If we were unable to repay the notes when required, the debenture holders could commence legal action against us to recover the amounts due. Any such action could require us to curtail or cease operations.

There are a large number of shares underlying our convertible debentures in full, and warrants that are registered and available for sale and the sale of these shares may depress the market price of our common stock. As of March 1, 2007, we had:

· certain outstanding 2005 Debentures that may be converted into an estimated 6,412,894 shares of common stock based on a conversion price of $0.90, and

· outstanding 2005 Warrants to purchase 1,463,223 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.95 that were issued in connection with the sale of the 2005 Debentures, and

· outstanding 2006 Debentures that may be converted into an estimated 37,584,635 shares of common stock based on a conversion price of $0.288, and

· outstanding 2006 Warrants to purchase 19,064,670 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.3168 that were issued in connection with the sale of the 2006 Debentures, and

· outstanding replacement warrants to purchase 4,541,672 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.95, and

· outstanding warrants to purchase 4,575,521 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.3168 that were issued in connection with the sale of the 2006 Debentures.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price for our common stock and make it more difficult for you to sell shares of our common stock at times and prices that you feel are appropriate.

The issuance of shares upon conversion of the convertible debentures and exercise of outstanding warrants will cause immediate and substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. The issuance of shares upon conversion of the convertible debentures and exercise of warrants, including the replacement warrants, will result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders since the selling security holders may ultimately convert and sell the full amount issuable on conversion. Although no single selling security holder may convert its convertible debentures and/or exercise its warrants if such conversion or exercise would cause it to own more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock, this restriction does not prevent each selling security holder from converting and/or exercising some of its holdings and then converting the rest of its holdings. In this way, each selling security holder could sell more than this limit while never holding more than this limit. There is no upper limit on the number of shares that may be issued which will have the effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest and voting power of holders of our common stock, including investors in this offering. In addition, the issuance of the 2006 Debentures and the 2006 Warrants triggered certain anti-dilution rights for certain third parties currently holding securities of the Company resulting in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders.

Payment of mandatory monthly redemptions in shares of common stock will result in substantial dilution. We expect to satisfy all or a significant portion of our obligation to redeem 1/30th of the

aggregate original principal amount of debentures per month through issuance of additional shares of our common stock. This approach will result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders.

If we fail to effect and maintain registration of the common stock issued or issuable pursuant to conversion of our debentures, or upon exercise of our warrants, we may be obligated to pay the investors of those securities liquidated damages. We have various obligations to file and obtain the effectiveness of certain registration statements which include certain outstanding common stock and common stock underlying outstanding debentures and common stock underlying the warrants. If we fail to meet any obligations we have to have effective and current registration statements available (including the current registration statement related to the common stock underlying our debentures and warrants), we may become obligated to pay liquidated damages to investors to the extent they may be entitled to such damages. In addition, pursuant to the amendments to the 2005 and 2006 financing documents described above, we are contractually obligated to file additional registration statements at various times in the future. Because of the SEC’s recent interpretation of Rule 415, we cannot offer any assurances that we will be able to obtain the effectiveness of any registration statement or post-effective amendments that we may file.

Risks Relating to Government Regulation

Companies such as ours engaged in research using nuclear transfer and embryonic stem cells are currently subject to strict government regulations, and our operations could be harmed by any legislative or administrative efforts impacting the use of nuclear transfer technology or human embryonic material. Our business is focused on human cell therapy, which includes the production of human differentiated cells from stem cells and involves the use of nuclear transfer technology, human oocytes, and embryonic material. Nuclear transfer technology, commonly known as therapeutic cloning, and research utilizing embryonic stem cells are controversial subjects, and are currently subject to intense scrutiny, both in the United States, the United Nations and throughout the world, particularly in the area of nuclear transfer of human cells and the use of human embryonic material.

We cannot assure you that our operations will not be harmed by any legislative or administrative efforts by politicians or groups opposed to the development of nuclear transfer technology generally or the use of nuclear transfer for therapeutic cloning of human cells specifically. Further, we cannot assure you that legislative or administrative restrictions directly or indirectly delaying, limiting or preventing the use of nuclear transfer technology or human embryonic material or the sale, manufacture or use of products or services derived from nuclear transfer technology or human embryonic material will not be adopted in the future.

Restrictions on the use of human embryonic stem cells, and the ethical, legal and social implications of that research, could prevent us from developing or gaining acceptance for commercially viable products in these areas. Some of our most important programs involve the use of stem cells that are derived from human embryos. The use of human embryonic stem cells gives rise to ethical, legal and social issues regarding the appropriate use of these cells. In the event that our research related to human embryonic stem cells becomes the subject of adverse commentary or publicity, the market price for our common stock could be significantly harmed. Some political and religious groups have voiced opposition to our technology and practices. We use stem cells derived from human embryos that have been created for in vitro fertilization procedures but are no longer desired or suitable for that use and are donated with appropriate informed consent for research use. Many research institutions, including some of our scientific collaborators, have adopted policies regarding the ethical use of human embryonic tissue. These policies may have the effect of limiting the scope of research conducted using human embryonic stem cells, thereby impairing our ability to conduct research in this field.

Potential and actual legislation and regulation at the federal or state level related to our technology could limit our activities and ability to develop products for commercial sales, depriving us of our anticipated source of future revenues. Legislative bills could be introduced in the future aiming to prohibit the use or commercialization of somatic cell nuclear transfer technology or of any products resulting from it, including those related to human therapeutic cloning and regenerative medicine. Such legislation could have a significant influence on our ability to pursue our research, development and commercialization plans in the United States.

Any future or additional government-imposed restrictions in these or other jurisdictions with respect to use of embryos or human embryonic stem cells in research and development could have a material adverse effect on us, by, among other things:

· harming our ability to establish critical partnerships and collaborations,

· delaying or preventing progress in our research and development,

· limiting or preventing the development, sale or use of our products, and

· causing a decrease in the price of our stock.

Because we or our collaborators must obtain regulatory approval to market our products in the United States and other countries, we cannot predict whether or when we will be permitted to commercialize our products. Federal, state and local governments in the United States and governments in other countries have significant regulations in place that govern many of our activities. We are or may become subject to various federal, state and local laws, regulations and recommendations relating to safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the experimental use of animals and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances used in connection with our research and development work. The preclinical testing and clinical trials of the products that we or our collaborators develop are subject to extensive government regulation that may prevent us from creating commercially viable products from our discoveries. In addition, the sale by us or our collaborators of any commercially viable product will be subject to government regulation from several standpoints, including manufacturing, advertising and promoting, selling and marketing, labeling, and distributing.

If, and to the extent that, we are unable to comply with these regulations, our ability to earn revenues will be materially and negatively impacted. The regulatory process, particularly in the biotechnology field, is uncertain, can take many years and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. Biological drugs and non-biological drugs are rigorously regulated. In particular, proposed human pharmaceutical therapeutic product candidates are subject to rigorous preclinical and clinical testing and other requirements by the FDA in the United States and similar health authorities in other countries in order to demonstrate safety and efficacy. We may never obtain regulatory approval to market our proposed products. For additional information about governmental regulations that will affect our planned and intended business operations, see “DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS—Government Regulation” in our Annual Report on Form 10KSB for fiscal year 2006.

Our products may not receive FDA approval, which would prevent us from commercially marketing our products and producing revenues. The FDA and comparable government agencies in foreign countries impose substantial regulations on the manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products through lengthy and detailed laboratory, pre-clinical and clinical testing procedures, sampling activities and other costly and time-consuming procedures. Satisfaction of these regulations typically takes several years or more and varies substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the proposed product. We cannot yet accurately predict when we might first submit any Investigational New Drug, or IND, application to the FDA, or whether any such IND application would be granted on a timely basis, if at all, nor can we assure you that we will successfully complete any clinical trials in connection with any such IND application. Further, we cannot yet accurately predict when we might first submit any product license

application for FDA approval or whether any such product license application would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. As a result, we cannot assure you that FDA approvals for any products developed by us will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any such delay in obtaining, or failure to obtain, such approvals could have a material adverse effect on the marketing of our products and our ability to generate product revenue. For additional information about governmental regulations that will affect our planned and intended business operations, see “DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS—Government Regulation” in our Annual Report on Form 10KSB for fiscal year 2006.

For-profit entities may be prohibited from benefiting from grant funding. There has been much publicity about grant resources for stem cell research, including Proposition 71 in California, which is described more fully under the heading “DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS—California Proposition 71” in our Annual Report on Form 10KSB for fiscal year 2006. There is ongoing litigation in California that may delay, or prevent the sale of State bonds that would fund the activities contemplated by California voters. In addition, rules and regulations related to any funding that may ultimately be provided, the type of entity that will be eligible for funding, the science to be funded, and funding details have not been finalized. As a result of these uncertainties regarding Proposition 71, we cannot assure you that funding, if any, will be available to us, or any for-profit entity.

The government maintains certain rights in technology that we develop using government grant money and we may lose the revenues from such technology if we do not commercialize and utilize the technology pursuant to established government guidelines. Certain of our and our licensors’ research has been or is being funded in part by government grants. In connection with certain grants, the U.S. government retains rights in the technology developed with the grant. These rights could restrict our ability to fully capitalize upon the value of this research.

Risks Relating to Our Reliance on Third Parties

We depend on our collaborators to help us develop and test our proposed products, and our ability to develop and commercialize products may be impaired or delayed if collaborations are unsuccessful. Our strategy for the development, clinical testing and commercialization of our proposed products requires that we enter into collaborations with corporate partners, licensors, licensees and others. We are dependent upon the subsequent success of these other parties in performing their respective responsibilities and the continued cooperation of our partners. Our collaborators may not cooperate with us or perform their obligations under our agreements with them. We cannot control the amount and timing of our collaborators’ resources that will be devoted to our research and development activities related to our collaborative agreements with them. Our collaborators may choose to pursue existing or alternative technologies in preference to those being developed in collaboration with us.

Under agreements with collaborators, we may rely significantly on such collaborators to, among other things:

· design and conduct advanced clinical trials in the event that we reach clinical trials,

· fund research and development activities with us,

· pay us fees upon the achievement of milestones, and

· market with us any commercial products that result from our collaborations.

The development and commercialization of potential products will be delayed if collaborators fail to conduct these activities in a timely manner or at all. In addition, our collaborators could terminate their agreements with us and we may not receive any development or milestone payments. If we do not achieve milestones set forth in the agreements, or if our collaborators breach or terminate their collaborative agreements with us, our business may be materially harmed.

Our reliance on the activities of our non-employee consultants, research institutions, and scientific contractors, whose activities are not wholly within our control, may lead to delays in development of our proposed products. We rely extensively upon and have relationships with scientific consultants at academic and other institutions, some of whom conduct research at our request, and other consultants with expertise in clinical development strategy or other matters. These consultants are not our employees and may have commitments to, or consulting or advisory contracts with, other entities that may limit their availability to us. We have limited control over the activities of these consultants and, except as otherwise required by our collaboration and consulting agreements to the extent they exist, can expect only limited amounts of their time to be dedicated to our activities.

In addition, we have formed research collaborations with academic and other research institutions throughout the world. These research facilities may have commitments to other commercial and non-commercial entities. We have limited control over the operations of these laboratories and can expect only limited amounts of time to be dedicated to our research goals.

We also rely on other companies for certain process development or other technical scientific work. We have contracts with these companies that specify the work to be done and results to be achieved, but we do not have direct control over their personnel or operations. If any of these third parties are unable or refuse to contribute to projects on which we need their help, our ability to generate advances in our technologies and develop our products could be significantly harmed.

General Risks Relating to Our Business

We may be subject to litigation that will be costly to defend or pursue and uncertain in its outcome. Our business may bring us into conflict with our licensees, licensors, or others with whom we have contractual or other business relationships, or with our competitors or others whose interests differ from ours. If we are unable to resolve those conflicts on terms that are satisfactory to all parties, we may become involved in litigation brought by or against us. That litigation is likely to be expensive and may require a significant amount of management’s time and attention, at the expense of other aspects of our business. The outcome of litigation is always uncertain, and in some cases could include judgments against us that require us to pay damages, enjoin us from certain activities, or otherwise affect our legal or contractual rights, which could have a significant adverse effect on our business.

We may not be able to obtain third-party patient reimbursement or favorable product pricing, which would reduce our ability to operate profitably. Our ability to successfully commercialize certain of our proposed products in the human therapeutic field may depend to a significant degree on patient reimbursement of the costs of such products and related treatments at acceptable levels from government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations. We cannot assure you that reimbursement in the United States or foreign countries will be available for any products we may develop or, if available, will not be decreased in the future, or that reimbursement amounts will not reduce the demand for, or the price of, our products with a consequent harm to our business. We cannot predict what additional regulation or legislation relating to the health care industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future or what effect such regulation or legislation may have on our business. If additional regulations are overly onerous or expensive, or if health care related legislation makes our business more expensive or burdensome than originally anticipated, we may be forced to significantly downsize our business plans or completely abandon our business model.

Our products are likely to be expensive to manufacture, and they may not be profitable if we are unable to control the costs to manufacture them. Our products are likely to be significantly more expensive to manufacture than most other drugs currently on the market today. Our present manufacturing processes produce modest quantities of product intended for use in our ongoing research activities, and we have not developed processes, procedures and capability to produce commercial volumes of product. We hope to substantially reduce manufacturing costs through process improvements, development of new science, increases in manufacturing scale and outsourcing to experienced manufacturers. If we are not able to make these or other improvements, and depending on the pricing of the product, our profit margins may be significantly less than that of most drugs on the market today. In addition, we may not be able to charge a high enough price for any cell therapy product we develop, even if they are safe and effective, to make a profit. If we are unable to realize significant profits from our potential product candidates, our business would be materially harmed.

To be successful, our proposed products must be accepted by the health care community, which can be very slow to adopt or unreceptive to new technologies and products. Our proposed products and those developed by our collaborative partners, if approved for marketing, may not achieve market acceptance since hospitals, physicians, patients or the medical community in general may decide not to accept and utilize these products. The products that we are attempting to develop represent substantial departures from established treatment methods and will compete with a number of more conventional drugs and therapies manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical companies. The degree of market acceptance of any of our developed products will depend on a number of factors, including:

· our establishment and demonstration to the medical community of the clinical efficacy and safety of our proposed products;

· our ability to create products that are superior to alternatives currently on the market;

· our ability to establish in the medical community the potential advantage of our treatments over alternative treatment methods; and

· reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors.

If the health care community does not accept our products for any of the foregoing reasons, or for any other reason, our business would be materially harmed.

Our current source of revenues depends on the stability and performance of our sublicensees. Our ability to collect royalties on product sales from our sublicensees will depend on the financial and operational success of the companies operating under a sublicense. Revenues from those licensees will depend upon the financial and operational success of those third parties. We cannot assure you that these licensees will be successful in obtaining requisite financing or in developing and successfully marketing their products. These licensees may experience unanticipated obstacles including regulatory hurdles, and scientific or technical challenges, which could have the effect of reducing their ability to generate revenues and pay us royalties.

We depend on key personnel for our continued operations and future success, and a loss of certain key personnel could significantly hinder our ability to move forward with our business plan. Because of the specialized nature of our business, we are highly dependent on our ability to identify, hire, train and retain highly qualified scientific and technical personnel for the research and development activities we conduct or sponsor. The loss of one or more certain key executive officers, or scientific officers, would be significantly detrimental to us. In addition, recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel to perform research and development work is critical to our success. Our anticipated growth and expansion into areas and activities requiring additional expertise, such as clinical testing, regulatory compliance, manufacturing and marketing, will require the addition of new management personnel and the development of additional expertise by existing management personnel. There is intense competition for

qualified personnel in the areas of our present and planned activities, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for the development of our business. The failure to attract and retain such personnel or to develop such expertise would adversely affect our business.

Our credibility as a business operating in the field of human embryonic stem cells is largely dependent upon the support of our Ethics Advisory Board. Because the use of human embryonic stem cells gives rise to ethical, legal and social issues, we have instituted an Ethics Advisory Board. Our Ethics Advisory Board is made up of highly qualified individuals with expertise in the field of human embryonic stem cells. We cannot assure you that these members will continue to serve on our Ethics Advisory Board, and the loss of any such member may affect the credibility and effectiveness of the Board. As a result, our business may be materially harmed in the event of any such loss.

Our insurance policies may be inadequate and potentially expose us to unrecoverable risks. We have limited director and officer insurance and commercial insurance policies. Any significant insurance claims would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Insurance availability, coverage terms and pricing continue to vary with market conditions. We endeavor to obtain appropriate insurance coverage for insurable risks that we identify, however, we may fail to correctly anticipate or quantify insurable risks, we may not be able to obtain appropriate insurance coverage, and insurers may not respond as we intend to cover insurable events that may occur. We have observed rapidly changing conditions in the insurance markets relating to nearly all areas of traditional corporate insurance. Such conditions have resulted in higher premium costs, higher policy deductibles, and lower coverage limits. For some risks, we may not have or maintain insurance coverage because of cost or availability.

We have no product liability insurance, which may leave us vulnerable to future claims we will be unable to satisfy. The testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of human therapeutic products entail an inherent risk of product liability claims, and we cannot assure you that substantial product liability claims will not be asserted against us. We have no product liability insurance. In the event we are forced to expend significant funds on defending product liability actions, and in the event those funds come from operating capital, we will be required to reduce our business activities, which could lead to significant losses.

We cannot assure you that adequate insurance coverage will be available in the future on acceptable terms, if at all, or that, if available, we will be able to maintain any such insurance at sufficient levels of coverage or that any such insurance will provide adequate protection against potential liabilities. Whether or not a product liability insurance policy is obtained or maintained in the future, any product liability claim could harm our business or financial condition.

We presently have members of management and other key employees located in various locations throughout the country which adds complexities to the operation of the business. Presently, we have members of management and other key employees located in both California and Massachusetts, which adds complexities to the operation of our business. We intend to maintain our research facilities in Massachusetts and we have established corporate offices and an additional research facility in California. We will likely continue to incur significant costs associated with maintaining multiple locations.

We face risks related to compliance with corporate governance laws and financial reporting standards. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related new rules and regulations implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, require changes in the corporate governance practices and financial reporting standards for public companies. These new laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to internal control over financial reporting, referred to as Section 404, have materially increased our legal and financial compliance costs and made some activities more time-consuming and more burdensome. Section 404 requires that by 2007 our management assess our internal control over financial reporting annually and include a report on its assessment in our annual report. In 2008 our independent registered public accounting firm may be required to audit both the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls and management’s assessment of the design and the operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

Stock prices for biotechnology companies have historically tended to be very volatile. Stock prices and trading volumes for many biotechnology companies fluctuate widely for a number of reasons, including but not limited to the following factors, some of which may be unrelated to their businesses or results of operations:

· clinical trial results

· the amount of cash resources and ability to obtain additional funding

· announcements of research activities, business developments, technological innovations or new products by companies or their competitors

· entering into or terminating strategic relationships

· changes in government regulation

· disputes concerning patents or proprietary rights

· changes in revenues or expense levels

· public concern regarding the safety, efficacy or other aspects of the products or methodologies being developed

· reports by securities analysts

· activities of various interest groups or organizations

· media coverage

· status of the investment markets

This market volatility, as well as general domestic or international economic, market and political conditions, could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the return on your investment.

A significant number of shares of our common stock have or will become available for sale and their sale could depress the price of our common stock. On January 31, 2006, a significant number of our outstanding securities that were previously restricted became eligible for sale under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. In addition, on January 31, 2007, a significant number of our outstanding securities that were previously restricted became eligible for sale under Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act, and their sale will not be subject to any volume limitations.

Not including the shares of common stock underlying the 2005 Debentures, the 2005 Warrants, the 2006 Debentures, the 2006 Warrants, and the replacement warrants, there are presently approximately 8,100,000 outstanding options, warrants and other securities convertible or exercisable into shares of our common stock.

We may also sell a substantial number of additional shares of our common stock in connection with a private placement or public offering of shares of our common stock (or other series or class of capital stock to be designated in the future). The terms of any such private placement would likely require us to register the resale of any shares of capital stock issued or issuable in the transaction. We have also issued common stock to certain parties, such as vendors and service providers, as payment for products and services. Under these arrangements, we may agree to register the shares for resale soon after their issuance. We may also continue to pay for certain goods and services with equity, which would dilute your interest in the company.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock under any of the circumstances described above could adversely affect the market price for our common stock and make it more difficult for you to sell shares of our common stock at times and prices that you feel are appropriate.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors and will be at the discretion of our board of directors. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we may incur additional indebtedness that may severely restrict or prohibit the payment of dividends.

Our securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which may limit the liquidity and price of our securities more than if our securities were quoted or listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or a national exchange. Our securities are currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, an NASD-sponsored and operated inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities not included in the Nasdaq Stock Market. Quotation of our securities on the OTC Bulletin Board may limit the liquidity and price of our securities more than if our securities were quoted or listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or a national exchange. Some investors may perceive our securities to be less attractive because they are traded in the over-the-counter market. In addition, as an OTC Bulletin Board listed company, we do not attract the extensive analyst coverage that accompanies companies listed on Nasdaq or any other regional or national exchange. Further, institutional and other investors may have investment guidelines that restrict or prohibit investing in securities traded in the over-the-counter market. These factors may have an adverse impact on the trading and price of our securities.

Our common stock is subject to “penny stock” regulations and restrictions on initial and secondary broker-dealer sales. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any listed, trading equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. Penny stocks are subject to certain additional oversight and regulatory requirements. Brokers and dealers affecting transactions in our common stock in many circumstances must obtain the written consent of a customer prior to purchasing our common stock, must obtain information from the customer and must provide disclosures to the customer. These requirements may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect your ability to sell your shares of our common stock in the secondary market.

ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, known to the chief executive officer or the principal accounting officer, that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

At the end of 2007, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require our management to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and at the end of 2008, our independent registered public accountants will be required to audit management’s assessment. We are in the process of performing the system and process documentation, evaluation and testing required for management to make this assessment and for its independent registered public accountants to provide their attestation report. We have not completed this process or its assessment, and this process will require significant amounts of management time and resources. In the course of evaluation and testing, management may identify deficiencies that will need to be addressed and remediated.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The issuances of the equity securities described below were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to sales by an issuer not involving a public offering, and/or pursuant to the requirements of one or more of the safe harbors provided in Regulation D under the Securities Act or, in the case of equity compensation to employees, directors and eligible consultants, Rule 701 therewith.

On February 5, 2007, we issued a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.96 per share to Steven Price in connection with consulting services provided to us by Mr. Price.

On February 5, 2007, the Company issued 800,000 shares of ‘restricted’ common stock to Infigen, Inc. at a per share price equal to $0.76 (the closing price on February 5, 2007) in connection with the execution of that certain Patent Assignment Agreement with Infigen, Inc.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Exhibit Description
	10.1	Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 11, 2007, to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 30, 2006, the Amortizing Convertible Debenture, dated September 6, 2006, and the Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 30, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.97 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 26, 2007 (File No. 333-140265) and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.2	Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 11, 2007, to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Amortizing Convertible Debenture, and the Registration Rights Agreement, each dated August 30, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.97 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 26, 2007 (File No. 333-140265) and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.3	Patent Assignment Agreement between Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and Infigen, Inc., dated February 5, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.98 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.4	Employment Agreement between Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and Pedro Huertas, M.D., Ph.D., dated February 5, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.99 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.5	Research Services Agreement between Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and Oregon Health & Science University, dated February 5, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.100 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).
	31.1	Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.*
	31.2	Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.*
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*
	32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
	By:	/s/ WILLIAM M. CALDWELL, IV
		William M. Caldwell, IV
		Chief Executive Officer
Dated: May 15, 2007

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Exhibit Description
	10.1	Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 11, 2007, to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 30, 2006, the Amortizing Convertible Debenture, dated September 6, 2006, and the Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 30, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.97 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 26, 2007 (File No. 333-140265) and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.2	Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 11, 2007, to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Amortizing Convertible Debenture, and the Registration Rights Agreement, each dated August 30, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.97 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 26, 2007 (File No. 333-140265) and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.3	Patent Assignment Agreement between Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and Infigen, Inc., dated February 5, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.98 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.4	Employment Agreement between Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and Pedro Huertas, M.D., Ph.D., dated February 5, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.99 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.5	Research Services Agreement between Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and Oregon Health & Science University, dated February 5, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.100 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).
	31.1	Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.*
	31.2	Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.*
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*
	32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*

* Filed herewith