Skip to main content

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Announces Judge Orders Trial For Case Brought By Parents Of Saugus High School Students Killed In Campus Shooting, Rejecting School District’s Defense That It Had No Duty To Protect The Students

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP announces a joint lawsuit brought by the parents of two Saugus High School students killed in a November 4, 2019, on-campus shooting will proceed to trial, according to the ruling issued by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Trial will likely begin in January 2024. The parents of Gracie Muehlberger and Dominic Blackwell allege that the Hart Union High School District had no program in place to identify and intervene with troubled students and, as a result, missed numerous red flags associated with the suicidal student who committed the murders. They also allege the District did not adequately supervise or secure the school campus.

The District had argued that it had no duty to protect the students and that the shooting was unforeseeable, both arguments rejected by the Court. The Court held that the general awareness of potential campus gun violence and need for safety protocols is the baseline foundation for the District’s specific duty to enact protections for student-on-student gun violence. It further held that the District’s argument that it could deny that ongoing threat unless and until a shooting occurred “myopically” limited the debate over campus safety requirements and “obtusely” denied an ongoing well-documented concern. The Court further recognized the vast difference between the resources required to help a single student in distress versus the outlays required to increase overall campus security.

The Judge has made clear that a school district cannot turn a blind eye to the risks of potential violence from troubled teenagers and inadequate campus supervision and security. It will now be a jury’s job to determine if the Hart Union High School District failed in its duty to protect the students whose lives were tragically lost in this foreseeable shooting by a suicidal student who was able to carry a gun onto campus through an unmonitored gate. We believe the jury will find that the school simply failed in its duty to ensure that personnel were watching over the campus and students that day.” Julie Fieber, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP.

The case is filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case No. 20STCV43946 consolidated with Case No. 20STCV44103.

About Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP engages exclusively in litigation and trials and has earned a national reputation for its dedication to prosecuting or defending socially just actions. To learn more about the firm, visit www.cpmlegal.com.

Contacts

Julie Fieber

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Burlingame Office

(415) 846-8759

jfieber@cpmlegal.com

Nick Hane

California Employment Counsel, Inc.

Costa Mesa, California

(714) 328-0672

nhane@employment-counsel.com



CPM MEDIA CONTACT:

Lee Houskeeper

San Francisco Stories

(415) 777-4700

Cell: (415) 654-9141

Newsservice@aol.com

615 Burnett Avenue, Suite 2, San Francisco, CA 94131

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.