þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2006 | ||
OR | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Maryland
|
68-0329422 | |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
One Belvedere Place,
Suite 300 Mill Valley, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
94941 (Zip Code) |
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share data) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||
Residential real estate loans
|
$ | 11,990,216 | $ | 13,874,792 | |||||
Residential loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
643,823 | 612,649 | |||||||
Commercial real estate loans
|
55,167 | 59,692 | |||||||
Commercial loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
66,648 | 57,687 | |||||||
Securities portfolio
|
1,817,628 | 1,748,581 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
85,466 | 175,885 | |||||||
Total Earning Assets
|
14,658,948 | 16,529,286 | |||||||
Restricted cash
|
131,171 | 72,421 | |||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
73,418 | 76,469 | |||||||
Interest rate agreements
|
47,642 | 31,220 | |||||||
Principal receivable
|
1,521 | 225 | |||||||
Deferred tax asset
|
4,866 | 5,384 | |||||||
Deferred asset-backed security
issuance costs
|
51,583 | 54,125 | |||||||
Other assets
|
9,593 | 7,830 | |||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 14,978,742 | $ | 16,776,960 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||||
Redwood debt
|
$ | | $ | 169,707 | |||||
Asset-backed securities issued
|
13,929,907 | 15,585,277 | |||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
43,402 | 41,027 | |||||||
Interest rate agreements
|
337 | 507 | |||||||
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
19,996 | 27,889 | |||||||
Dividends payable
|
17,767 | 17,593 | |||||||
Total Liabilities
|
14,011,409 | 15,842,000 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 11)
|
|||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|||||||||
Common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized;
25,381,858 and 25,132,625 issued and outstanding
|
254 | 251 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
839,167 | 824,365 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
81,591 | 73,731 | |||||||
Cumulative earnings
|
709,494 | 681,479 | |||||||
Cumulative distributions to
stockholders
|
(663,173 | ) | (644,866 | ) | |||||
Total Stockholders Equity
|
967,333 | 934,960 | |||||||
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
$ | 14,978,742 | $ | 16,776,960 | |||||
1
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Interest Income
|
||||||||
Residential real estate loans
|
$ | 165,805 | $ | 198,645 | ||||
Residential loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
27,748 | 19,624 | ||||||
Commercial real estate loans
|
1,273 | 1,402 | ||||||
Commercial loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
759 | 356 | ||||||
Securities portfolio
|
27,563 | 17,584 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
2,477 | 580 | ||||||
Interest income before provision
for credit losses
|
225,625 | 238,191 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
(176 | ) | (1,025 | ) | ||||
Total interest income
|
225,449 | 237,166 | ||||||
Interest Expense
|
||||||||
Redwood debt
|
(2,097 | ) | (2,728 | ) | ||||
Asset-backed securities issued
|
(178,605 | ) | (173,239 | ) | ||||
Total interest expense
|
(180,702 | ) | (175,967 | ) | ||||
Net Interest Income
|
44,747 | 61,199 | ||||||
Operating expenses
|
(12,102 | ) | (10,972 | ) | ||||
Net recognized (losses) gains and
valuation adjustments
|
(1,870 | ) | 15,012 | |||||
Net income before provision for
income taxes
|
30,775 | 65,239 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
(2,760 | ) | (4,677 | ) | ||||
Net Income
|
$ | 28,015 | $ | 60,562 | ||||
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
$ | 1.11 | $ | 2.49 | ||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
$ | 1.09 | $ | 2.42 | ||||
Regular dividends declared per
common share
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.70 | ||||
Special dividends declared per
common share
|
$ | | $ | | ||||
Total dividends declared per common
share
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.70 | ||||
Basic weighted average shares
outstanding
|
25,201,525 | 24,357,225 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding
|
25,702,730 | 25,020,932 |
2
(In thousands) | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 28,015 | $ | 60,562 | |||||
Other comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on
available-for-sale securities (AFS)
|
(8,058 | ) | 17,358 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net
losses (gains) included in net income
|
1,997 | (10,042 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized gains on cash flow
hedges
|
14,187 | 11,994 | |||||||
Reclassification of net realized
cash flow hedge (gains) losses to interest expense on
asset-backed securities issued
|
(266 | ) | 117 | ||||||
Total other comprehensive
income
|
7,860 | 19,427 | |||||||
Comprehensive Income
|
$ | 35,875 | $ | 79,989 | |||||
3
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006:
(In thousands, except share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-In | Comprehensive | Cumulative | to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Income | Earnings | Stockholders | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2005
|
25,132,625 | $ | 251 | $ | 824,365 | $ | 73,731 | $ | 681,479 | $ | (644,866 | ) | $ | 934,960 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
| | | | 28,015 | | 28,015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized
loss/reclassification on assets AFS
|
| | | (6,061 | ) | | | (6,061 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized
gain/reclassification on interest rate agreements
|
| | | 13,921 | | | 13,921 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Reinvestment &
Stock Purchase Plans
|
209,653 | 2 | 8,697 | | | | 8,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Option & Stock
Purchase Plans
|
42,126 | 1 | 471 | | | | 472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock & Stock
DERs
|
(2,546 | ) | | 5,634 | | | | 5,634 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
| | | | | (18,307 | ) | (18,307 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31,
2006
|
25,381,858 | $ | 254 | $ | 839,167 | $ | 81,591 | $ | 709,494 | $ | (663,173 | ) | $ | 967,333 | |||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005: |
Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-In | Comprehensive | Cumulative | to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Income | Earnings | Stockholders | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2004
|
24,153,576 | $ | 242 | $ | 773,222 | $ | 105,357 | $ | 481,607 | $ | (496,272 | ) | $ | 864,156 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
| | | | 60,562 | | 60,562 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized
gain/reclassification on assets AFS
|
| | | 7,316 | | | 7,316 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized
gain/reclassification on interest rate agreements
|
| | | 12,111 | | | 12,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend Reinvestment &
Stock Purchase Plans
|
344,755 | 3 | 19,245 | | | | 19,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Option & Stock
Purchase Plans
|
13,870 | | 222 | | | | 222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock & Stock
DERs
|
2,021 | | 1,631 | | | | 1,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
| | | | | (17,245 | ) | (17,245 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31,
2005
|
24,514,222 | $ | 245 | $ | 794,320 | $ | 124,784 | $ | 542,169 | $ | (513,517 | ) | $ | 948,001 | |||||||||||||||
4
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities:
|
||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 28,015 | $ | 60,562 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Net amortization of premiums,
discounts, and debt issuance costs
|
(16,104 | ) | (24,830 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of
non-financial assets
|
269 | 203 | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
176 | 1,025 | ||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation
|
5,634 | 1,631 | ||||||||
Net recognized gains (losses) and
valuation adjustments
|
1,870 | (15,012 | ) | |||||||
Net change in:
|
||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
3,051 | (9,150 | ) | |||||||
Principal receivable
|
(1,296 | ) | 2,507 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
518 | 2,397 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
(403 | ) | 1,274 | |||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
2,375 | 2,877 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
(7,893 | ) | (2,267 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
16,212 | 21,217 | ||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities:
|
||||||||||
Purchases of real estate loans
purchased for investment
|
(52,689 | ) | (839,114 | ) | ||||||
Principal payments on real estate
loans purchased for investment
|
1,928,003 | 1,560,296 | ||||||||
Purchases of real estate securities
|
(163,599 | ) | (249,016 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate
securities
|
13,634 | 39,655 | ||||||||
Principal payments on real estate
securities
|
45,083 | 51,002 | ||||||||
Net increase in restricted cash
|
(58,750 | ) | (22,393 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
1,711,682 | 540,430 | ||||||||
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities:
|
||||||||||
Net payments on Redwood debt
|
(169,707 | ) | (4,398 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of
asset-backed securities
|
277,800 | 1,050,934 | ||||||||
Deferred asset-backed security
issuance costs
|
(3,365 | ) | (7,345 | ) | ||||||
Repayments on asset-backed
securities
|
(1,911,617 | ) | (1,595,207 | ) | ||||||
Net purchases of interest rate
agreements
|
(2,463 | ) | (1,365 | ) | ||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
9,171 | 19,470 | ||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(18,132 | ) | (16,268 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
(1,818,313 | ) | (554,179 | ) | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
(90,419 | ) | 7,468 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
175,885 | 57,246 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
$ | 85,466 | $ | 64,714 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
||||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 178,327 | $ | 173,529 | ||||||
Cash paid for taxes
|
$ | 2,660 | $ | | ||||||
Non-cash financing
activity:
|
||||||||||
Dividends declared but not paid
|
$ | 17,767 | $ | 17,160 |
5
6
7
On-going analyses of the pool of loans including,
but not limited to, the age of loans, underwriting standards,
business climate, economic conditions, geographical
considerations, and other
Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans;
Relevant environmental factors;
Relevant market research and publicly available third-party
reference loss rates;
Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs;
Effects and changes in credit concentrations; and,
Prepayment assumptions.
8
On-going analyses of each individual loan including,
but not limited to, the age of loans, underwriting standards,
business climate, economic conditions, geographical
considerations, and other observable data;
On-going evaluations of fair values of collateral using current
appraisals and other valuations;
Discounted cash flow analyses; and,
Borrowers ability to meet obligations.
9
10
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share:
|
||||||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period
|
25,201,525 | 24,357,225 | ||||||
Net effect of dilutive stock options
|
501,205 | 663,707 | ||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings
per share
|
25,702,730 | 25,020,932 | ||||||
Basic Earnings Per
Share:
|
||||||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 1.11 | $ | 2.49 | ||||
Diluted Earnings Per
Share:
|
||||||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 1.09 | $ | 2.42 | ||||
11
Three Months Ended | |||||
(In thousands, except share data) | March 31, 2005 | ||||
Net income, as reported
|
$ | 60,562 | |||
Add: Dividend equivalent right
operating expenses under APB 25
|
1,778 | ||||
Deduct: Stock option operating
income under APB 25
|
(84 | ) | |||
Deduct: Stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value based method
for awards granted prior to January 1, 2003
|
(251 | ) | |||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 62,005 | |||
Earnings per share:
|
|||||
Basic as reported
|
$ | 2.49 | |||
Basic pro forma
|
$ | 2.55 | |||
Diluted as reported
|
$ | 2.42 | |||
Diluted pro forma
|
$ | 2.48 |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Stock price volatility
|
25.7 | % | 26.4 | % | ||||
Risk free rate of return (Treasury
Rate)
|
4.75 | % | 4.18 | % | ||||
Average life
|
5 years | 5 years | ||||||
Dividend yield assumptions
|
10.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
12
13
(In thousands) | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Loans
|
$ | 11,827,789 | $ | 13,693,833 | ||||
HELOCs
|
162,427 | 180,959 | ||||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 11,990,216 | $ | 13,874,792 | ||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Held-for- | Held-for- | |||||||
Investment | Investment | |||||||
Current face
|
$ | 11,846,454 | $ | 13,719,242 | ||||
Unamortized premium
|
166,134 | 178,206 | ||||||
Amortized cost
|
12,012,588 | 13,897,448 | ||||||
Lower of cost or market value
adjustments
|
| | ||||||
Reserve for credit losses
|
(22,372 | ) | (22,656 | ) | ||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 11,990,216 | $ | 13,874,792 | ||||
14
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 13,874,792 | $ | 22,504,765 | ||||
Acquisitions
|
52,689 | 832,383 | ||||||
Sales (other than to consolidated
ABS trusts)
|
| | ||||||
Principal repayments
|
(1,923,420 | ) | (1,555,031 | ) | ||||
Transfers to REO
|
(2,054 | ) | (721 | ) | ||||
Net premium amortization
|
(12,075 | ) | (7,644 | ) | ||||
Reversal of (provision for) credit
losses, net of charge offs
|
284 | (1,056 | ) | |||||
Net recognized gains (losses) and
valuation adjustments
|
| | ||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 11,990,216 | $ | 21,772,696 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Face | Carrying | Face | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
Unpledged
|
$ | 87,217 | $ | 87,434 | $ | 45,098 | $ | 45,299 | ||||||||
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Owned by securitization entities,
financed through the issuance of ABS
|
11,759,237 | 11,902,782 | 13,674,144 | 13,829,493 | ||||||||||||
Values
|
$ | 11,846,454 | $ | 11,990,216 | $ | 13,719,242 | $ | 13,874,792 | ||||||||
15
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Securities | Securities | |||||||
Available-for-Sale | Available-for-Sale | |||||||
Current face
|
$ | 1,087,135 | $ | 1,035,874 | ||||
Unamortized discount, net
|
(118,990 | ) | (126,811 | ) | ||||
Discount designated as credit
protection
|
(373,781 | ) | (354,610 | ) | ||||
Amortized cost
|
594,364 | 554,453 | ||||||
Gross unrealized gains
|
64,242 | 74,416 | ||||||
Gross unrealized losses
|
(14,783 | ) | (16,220 | ) | ||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 643,823 | $ | 612,649 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance of unamortized discount,
net, at beginning of period
|
$ | 126,811 | $ | 110,724 | ||||
Amortization of discount
|
(13,155 | ) | (8,727 | ) | ||||
Calls, sales, and other
|
903 | (12,908 | ) | |||||
Re-designation of credit protection
to discount
|
1,822 | (1,328 | ) | |||||
Acquisitions
|
2,609 | 1,644 | ||||||
Balance of unamortized discount,
net, at end of period
|
$ | 118,990 | $ | 89,405 | ||||
Balance of designated credit
protection at beginning of period
|
$ | 354,610 | $ | 340,123 | ||||
Realized credit losses
|
(2,577 | ) | (1,223 | ) | ||||
Calls, sales, and other
|
(4,710 | ) | (9,612 | ) | ||||
Re-designation of credit protection
to discount
|
(1,822 | ) | 1,328 | |||||
Acquisitions
|
28,280 | 35,382 | ||||||
Balance of designated credit
protection at end of period
|
$ | 373,781 | $ | 365,998 | ||||
16
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | (Losses) | Value | (Losses) | Value | (Losses) | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential loan credit-
enhancement securities
|
$ | 210,285 | $ | (13,112 | ) | $ | 21,017 | $ | (1,671 | ) | $ | 231,302 | $ | (14,783 | ) |
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 612,649 | $ | 561,658 | ||||
Acquisitions
|
52,822 | 67,809 | ||||||
Sales (other than to consolidated
ABS trusts)
|
(9,650 | ) | (27,293 | ) | ||||
Principal repayments (including
calls)
|
(17,469 | ) | (23,932 | ) | ||||
Discount amortization
|
13,155 | 8,727 | ||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses)
|
(8,738 | ) | 9,186 | |||||
Net recognized gains and valuation
adjustments
|
1,054 | 15,239 | ||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 643,823 | $ | 611,394 | ||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Unpledged
|
$ | 304,829 | $ | 276,045 | ||||
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
| 35,020 | ||||||
Owned by securitization entities,
financed through issuance of ABS
|
338,994 | 301,584 | ||||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 643,823 | $ | 612,649 | ||||
17
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-for- | Held-for- | Held-for- | Held-for- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sale | Investment | Total | Sale | Investment | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Current face
|
$ | 8,500 | $ | 57,008 | $ | 65,508 | $ | | $ | 70,091 | $ | 70,091 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized discount
|
(78 | ) | (2,122 | ) | (2,200 | ) | | (2,258 | ) | (2,258 | ) | |||||||||||||
Discount designated as credit
protection
|
| (8,141 | ) | (8,141 | ) | | (8,141 | ) | (8,141 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reserve for credit losses
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 8,422 | $ | 46,745 | $ | 55,167 | $ | | $ | 59,692 | $ | 59,692 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 59,692 | $ | 54,479 | ||||
Acquisitions
|
| 6,732 | ||||||
Principal repayments
|
(4,583 | ) | (5,267 | ) | ||||
Net discount
(premium) amortization
|
93 | (30 | ) | |||||
Reversal of (provision for) credit
losses
|
(35 | ) | 185 | |||||
Sales (other than to consolidated
ABS trusts)
|
| | ||||||
Net recognized gains and valuation
adjustments
|
| 505 | ||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 55,167 | $ | 56,604 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Face | Carrying | Face | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
Unpledged
|
$ | 10,659 | $ | 2,151 | $ | 15,161 | $ | 6,625 | ||||||||
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Owned by securitization entities,
financed through issuance of ABS
|
54,849 | 53,016 | 54,930 | 53,067 | ||||||||||||
Face and carrying values
|
$ | 65,508 | $ | 55,167 | $ | 70,091 | $ | 59,692 | ||||||||
18
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Securities | Securities | |||||||
Available-for-Sale | Available-for-Sale | |||||||
Current face
|
$ | 198,681 | $ | 175,343 | ||||
Net discount
|
(140,072 | ) | (122,332 | ) | ||||
Amortized cost
|
58,609 | 53,011 | ||||||
Gross unrealized gains
|
8,168 | 5,706 | ||||||
Gross unrealized losses
|
(129 | ) | (1,030 | ) | ||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 66,648 | $ | 57,687 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Beginning balance of net discount
|
$ | 122,332 | $ | 32,756 | ||||
Realized credit losses
|
(2 | ) | | |||||
Amortization
|
1,276 | 409 | ||||||
Calls, sales and other
|
38 | | ||||||
Acquisitions
|
16,428 | 30,162 | ||||||
Ending balance of net discount
|
$ | 140,072 | $ | 63,327 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | (Losses) | Value | (Losses) | Value | (Losses) | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loan CES
|
$ | 3,285 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,285 | $ | (129 | ) |
19
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 57,687 | $ | 14,498 | ||||
Acquisitions
|
6,911 | 12,870 | ||||||
Sales (other than to consolidated
ABS trusts)
|
| | ||||||
Principal repayments (including
calls)
|
| | ||||||
Net premium amortization
|
(1,276 | ) | (409 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized gains
|
3,364 | 1,611 | ||||||
Net recognized losses and valuation
adjustments
|
(38 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 66,648 | $ | 28,570 | ||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Securities | Securities | |||||||
Available-for-Sale | Available-for-Sale | |||||||
Current face
|
$ | 1,885,076 | $ | 1,810,146 | ||||
Unamortized discount
|
(76,566 | ) | (73,548 | ) | ||||
Unamortized premium
|
2,100 | 3,447 | ||||||
Unamortized premium
interest-only certificates
|
14,036 | 14,866 | ||||||
Amortized cost
|
1,824,646 | 1,754,911 | ||||||
Gross unrealized gains
|
14,772 | 13,200 | ||||||
Gross unrealized losses
|
(21,790 | ) | (19,530 | ) | ||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 1,817,628 | $ | 1,748,581 | ||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Commercial real estate securities
|
$ | 317,551 | $ | 322,366 | ||||
Residential prime real estate
securities
|
756,142 | 690,329 | ||||||
Residential sub prime real estate
securities
|
442,197 | 442,114 | ||||||
Residential second lien real estate
securities
|
99,950 | 107,550 | ||||||
REIT corporate debt
|
31,053 | 31,569 | ||||||
Real estate CDOs
|
170,735 | 154,653 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,817,628 | $ | 1,748,581 | ||||
20
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | (Losses) | Value | (Losses) | Value | (Losses) | |||||||||||||||||||
Securities portfolio
|
$ | 695,945 | $ | (17,506 | ) | $ | 98,446 | $ | (4,284 | ) | $ | 794,391 | $ | (21,790 | ) |
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 1,748,581 | $ | 1,380,077 | ||||
Acquisitions
|
103,866 | 168,337 | ||||||
Sales (other than to consolidated
ABS trusts)
|
(3,984 | ) | (12,362 | ) | ||||
Principal repayments
|
(27,614 | ) | (27,070 | ) | ||||
Net discount amortization
|
650 | 115 | ||||||
Net unrealized losses
|
(688 | ) | (3,480 | ) | ||||
Net recognized losses and valuation
adjustments
|
(3,183 | ) | (240 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 1,817,628 | $ | 1,505,377 | ||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Unpledged
|
$ | 52,714 | $ | 37,493 | ||||
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
| 129,406 | ||||||
Owned by securitization entities,
financed through the issuance of ABS
|
1,764,914 | 1,581,682 | ||||||
Carrying value
|
$ | 1,817,628 | $ | 1,748,581 | ||||
21
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Realized gains on calls:
|
|||||||||
Residential loan CES
|
$ | | $ | 7,548 | |||||
Realized gains on sales:
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate loans
|
| 505 | |||||||
Residential loan CES
|
1,054 | 7,725 | |||||||
Securities portfolio
|
5 | 117 | |||||||
Valuation adjustments
(other-than-temporary impairments)
|
|||||||||
Residential loan CES
|
| (34 | ) | ||||||
Securities portfolio
|
(3,188 | ) | (357 | ) | |||||
Commercial loan CES
|
(38 | ) | | ||||||
Gains (losses) on interest rate
agreements
|
297 | (492 | ) | ||||||
Net recognized (losses) gains and
valuation adjustments
|
$ | (1,870 | ) | $ | 15,012 | ||||
NOTE 4. | RESERVES FOR CREDIT LOSSES |
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 22,656 | $ | 23,396 | ||||
Provision for credit losses
|
141 | 1,210 | ||||||
Charge-offs
|
(425 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 22,372 | $ | 24,452 | ||||
22
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | | $ | 500 | ||||
Reversal of credit losses
|
35 | (185 | ) | |||||
Charge-offs
|
(35 | ) | (315 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | | $ | | ||||
23
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Notional | Credit | Fair | Notional | Credit | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Amount | Exposure | Value | Amount | Exposure | |||||||||||||||||||
Trading Instruments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate caps purchased
|
$ | 1,702 | $ | 116,400 | $ | | $ | 1,913 | $ | 116,400 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Interest rate caps sold
|
(231 | ) | (65,000 | ) | | (239 | ) | (65,000 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate corridors purchased
|
| 1,018,892 | | | 1,059,851 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps
|
315 | 103,342 | | 148 | 80,400 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps
|
45,519 | 4,393,078 | (2,131 | ) | 28,891 | 5,399,653 | (2,672 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Interest Rate
Agreements
|
$ | 47,305 | $ | 5,566,712 | $ | (2,131 | ) | $ | 30,713 | $ | 6,591,304 | $ | (2,672 | ) | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net Amounts Credited to
(Included in) Interest Expense for Cash Flow
Hedges
|
||||||||
Realized net gains (losses)
reclassified from other comprehensive income
|
$ | 266 | $ | (117 | ) | |||
Realized net gains due to net
ineffective portion of hedges
|
483 | 396 | ||||||
Net cash receipts on interest rate
swaps
|
2,231 | 1,190 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,980 | $ | 1,469 | ||||
Net Recognized Gains (Losses)
and Valuation Adjustments
|
||||||||
Realized net gains (losses) on
trading instruments
|
$ | 297 | $ | (492 | ) | |||
24
NOTE 6.
SHORT-TERM DEBT
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Interest | Days Until | Amount | Interest | Days Until | |||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed | Rate | Maturity | Borrowed | Rate | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loan
collateral
|
$ | | | | $ | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Residential loan CES collateral
|
| | | 38,707 | 4.99 | % | 73 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loan
collateral
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loan CES collateral
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities portfolio collateral
|
| | | 131,000 | 5.07 | % | 73 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Redwood debt
|
$ | | | | $ | 169,707 | 5.05 | % | 73 | |||||||||||||||
25
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Within 30 days
|
$ | | $ | | ||||
31 to 90 days
|
| 169,707 | ||||||
Over 90 days
|
| | ||||||
Total Redwood debt
|
$ | | $ | 169,707 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Number | ||||||||||||||||
of | ||||||||||||||||
Facilities | Outstanding | Limit | Maturity | |||||||||||||
Facilities by Collateral
|
||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Loans
|
4 | $ | | $ | 1,800,000 | 9/06-1/07 | ||||||||||
Real Estate Securities
|
1 | | 300,000 | 9/06 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Line of Credit
|
1 | | 10,000 | 8/06 | ||||||||||||
Madrona Commercial Paper Facility
|
1 | | 300,000 | 4/08 | ||||||||||||
Total Facilities
|
7 | $ | | $ | 2,410,000 | |||||||||||
December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Number | ||||||||||||||||
of | ||||||||||||||||
Facilities | Outstanding | Limit | Maturity | |||||||||||||
Facilities by Collateral
|
||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Loans
|
4 | $ | | $ | 1,800,000 | 1/06-9/06 | ||||||||||
Real Estate Securities
|
1 | 169,707 | 300,000 | 3/06 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Line of Credit
|
1 | | 10,000 | 8/06 | ||||||||||||
Madrona Commercial Paper Facility
|
1 | | 300,000 | 4/08 | ||||||||||||
Total Facilities
|
7 | $ | 169,707 | $ | 2,410,000 | |||||||||||
26
NOTE 7.
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES ISSUED
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Sequoia ABS issued
certificates with principal value
|
11,361,138 | 13,246,343 | ||||||
Sequoia ABS issued
interest-only certificates
|
123,761 | 142,788 | ||||||
Acacia ABS issued
|
2,417,228 | 2,165,840 | ||||||
Commercial ABS issued
|
4,250 | 4,250 | ||||||
Madrona ABS issued
|
5,400 | 5,400 | ||||||
Unamortized premium on ABS
|
18,130 | 20,656 | ||||||
Total consolidated ABS issued
|
$ | 13,929,907 | $ | 15,585,277 | ||||
Range of weighted average interest
rates, by series Sequoia
|
4.49% to 5.64 | % | 4.23% to 5.65 | % | ||||
Stated Sequoia maturities
|
2007 - 2035 | 2007 - 2035 | ||||||
Number of Sequoia series
|
42 | 42 | ||||||
Range of weighted average interest
rates, by series Acacia
|
5.04% - 5.82 | % | 4.32% - 5.40 | % | ||||
Stated Acacia maturities
|
2023 - 2046 | 2023 - 2046 | ||||||
Number of Acacia series
|
9 | 8 | ||||||
Weighted average interest
rates Commercial
|
12.00 | % | 12.00 | % | ||||
Stated commercial maturities
|
2009 | 2009 | ||||||
Number of commercial series
|
1 | 1 |
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Sequoia
|
$ | 24,436 | $ | 26,225 | ||||
Acacia
|
18,922 | 13,778 | ||||||
Commercial
|
44 | 44 | ||||||
Total accrued interest payable on
ABS issued
|
$ | 43,402 | $ | 40,047 | ||||
27
(In thousands) | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Residential real estate loans
|
$ | 11,902,782 | $ | 13,829,493 | ||||
Residential loan CES
|
338,994 | 301,584 | ||||||
Commercial real estate loans
|
53,016 | 53,067 | ||||||
Securities portfolio securities
|
1,764,914 | 1,581,682 | ||||||
Real estate owned (REO)
|
4,031 | 2,589 | ||||||
Restricted cash owned by
consolidated securitization entities
|
131,171 | 70,276 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
68,402 | 71,850 | ||||||
Total collateral for ABS issued
|
$ | 14,263,310 | $ | 15,910,541 | ||||
28
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Current Tax Provision:
|
|||||||||
Redwood REIT Federal
|
$ | 1,300 | $ | 1,100 | |||||
Holdings Federal
|
400 | 410 | |||||||
State unitary (Redwood and Holdings)
|
542 | 770 | |||||||
Total current tax provision
|
2,242 | 2,280 | |||||||
Deferred tax provision:
|
|||||||||
Holdings deferred tax provision
|
518 | 2,397 | |||||||
Total provision for income tax
|
$ | 2,760 | $ | 4,677 | |||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Net operating loss carry
forward Federal
|
$ | | $ | | ||||
Net operating loss carry
forward State
|
687 | 725 | ||||||
Capital loss carry forward
|
14 | | ||||||
Real estate assets
|
1,900 | 1,970 | ||||||
Gains from Sequoia securitizations
|
1,890 | 2,536 | ||||||
State credit carry forward
|
229 | 229 | ||||||
Negative amortization loan reserve
|
78 | | ||||||
Interest rate agreements
|
367 | 224 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
$ | 5,165 | $ | 5,684 | ||||
Valuation allowance
|
(299 | ) | (300 | ) | ||||
Total benefited deferred tax assets
|
$ | 4,866 | $ | 5,384 | ||||
29
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | ||||||||||||||||
Value | Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate loans
|
|||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans:
held-for-investment
|
$ | 11,990,216 | $ | 11,898,483 | $ | 13,874,792 | $ | 13,794,513 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate loans:
held-for-investment
|
$ | 46,745 | $ | 47,975 | $ | 59,692 | $ | 61,196 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate loans:
held-for-sale
|
$ | 8,422 | $ | 8,422 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Real estate loan securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Residential loan credit-enhancement
securities: available-for-sale
|
$ | 643,823 | $ | 643,823 | $ | 612,649 | $ | 612,649 | |||||||||
Commercial loan credit-enhancement
securities, available-for-sale
|
$ | 66,648 | $ | 66,648 | $ | 57,687 | $ | 57,687 | |||||||||
Securities portfolio:
available-for-sale
|
$ | 1,817,628 | $ | 1,817,628 | $ | 1,748,581 | $ | 1,748,581 | |||||||||
Interest rate agreements
|
$ | 47,642 | $ | 47,642 | $ | 31,220 | $ | 31,220 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 85,466 | $ | 85,466 | $ | 175,885 | $ | 175,885 | |||||||||
Restricted cash
|
$ | 131,171 | $ | 131,171 | $ | 72,421 | $ | 72,421 | |||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
$ | 73,418 | $ | 73,418 | $ | 76,469 | $ | 76,469 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||||||||||||
Redwood debt
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 169,707 | $ | 169,707 | |||||||||
ABS issued
|
$ | 13,929,907 | $ | 13,878,161 | $ | 15,585,277 | $ | 15,519,383 | |||||||||
Interest rate agreements
|
$ | 337 | $ | 337 | $ | 507 | $ | 507 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
$ | 43,402 | $ | 43,402 | $ | 41,027 | $ | 41,027 |
| Residential loan and HELOC fair values are determined by available market quotes and discounted cash flow analyses and are confirmed by third party/dealer pricing indications. | |
| Commercial loan fair values are determined by appraisals on underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analyses. |
30
Residential and commercial real estate securities fair values
are determined by discounted cash flow analyses and other
valuation techniques using market pricing assumptions confirmed
by third party dealer/pricing indications.
Fair values on interest rate agreements are determined by third
party vendor modeling software and from valuations provided by
dealers active in derivative markets.
Includes cash on hand and highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less. Fair values equal
carrying values.
Includes interest earning cash balances in ABS entities for the
purpose of distribution to bondholders and reinvestment. Due to
the short-term nature of the restrictions, fair values
approximate carrying values.
Includes interest due and receivable on assets and due and
payable on our liabilities. Due to the short-term nature of when
these interest payments will be received or paid, fair values
approximate carrying values.
All Redwood debt is adjustable and matures within one year; fair
values approximate carrying values.
Fair values are determined by discounted cash flow analyses and
other valuation techniques confirmed by third party/dealer
pricing indications.
The fair values of purchase commitments were negligible and are
thus not listed in this table. See Note 11 for a
further discussion of our commitments.
NOTE 10.
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
31
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Shares | Price | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options
|
|||||||||||||||||
Outstanding options at beginning of
period
|
1,548,412 | $ | 32.60 | 1,624,465 | $ | 26.75 | |||||||||||
Options granted
|
33,871 | 41.09 | 2,000 | 51.30 | |||||||||||||
Options exercised
|
(39,420 | ) | 23.81 | (15,640 | ) | 14.60 | |||||||||||
Options forfeited
|
(34,906 | ) | 41.07 | (2,972 | ) | 31.38 | |||||||||||
Stock dividend equivalent rights
earned
|
| | 4,576 | | |||||||||||||
Outstanding options at end of period
|
1,507,957 | $ | 33.19 | 1,612,429 | $ | 31.88 | |||||||||||
Options exercisable at period-end
|
1,244,756 | $ | 29.85 | 1,115,506 | $ | 26.90 | |||||||||||
Weighted average fair value of
options granted during the period
|
$ | 3.41 | $ | 16.18 |
32
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Number | Contractual Life | Weighted-Average | Number | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||||||
Prices | Outstanding | in Years | Exercise Price | Exercisable | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
$10 to $20
|
351,783 | 3.43 | $ | 12.75 | 351,783 | $ | 12.75 | |||||||||||||
$20 to $30
|
389,059 | 4.45 | $ | 24.17 | 335,251 | $ | 23.70 | |||||||||||||
$30 to $40
|
266,460 | 1.15 | $ | 37.49 | 259,064 | $ | 37.51 | |||||||||||||
$40 to $50
|
131,312 | 3.07 | $ | 44.37 | 130,981 | $ | 44.38 | |||||||||||||
$50 to $60
|
368,542 | 7.89 | $ | 55.08 | 166,876 | $ | 54.80 | |||||||||||||
$60 to $63
|
801 | 6.37 | $ | 62.54 | 801 | $ | 62.54 | |||||||||||||
$ 0 to $63
|
1,507,957 | 4.35 | $ | 33.19 | 1,244,756 | $ | 29.85 | |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||
2006 | Exercise Price | 2005 | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||
Restricted stock outstanding at the
beginning of period
|
21,038 | $ | 45.96 | 5,912 | $ | 45.47 | ||||||||||
Restricted stock granted
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Stock for which restrictions lapsed
|
(972 | ) | 53.74 | (1,750 | ) | 18.62 | ||||||||||
Restricted stock forfeited
|
(1,996 | ) | 45.03 | (331 | ) | 55.96 | ||||||||||
Restricted stock outstanding at end
of period
|
18,070 | $ | 45.65 | 3,831 | $ | 56.83 | ||||||||||
33
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Participants deferrals
|
$ | 1,366 | $ | 307 | ||||
Accrued interest earned in EDCP
|
296 | 343 | ||||||
Purchase of DSUs
|
(241 | ) | | |||||
Participants withdrawals
|
| | ||||||
Net change in participants
equity
|
$ | 1,421 | $ | 650 | ||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 7,005 | $ | 4,928 | ||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 8,426 | $ | 5,578 |
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Cash Accounts
|
||||||||
Participants deferrals
|
$ | 5,199 | $ | 4,064 | ||||
Accrued interest credited
|
3,227 | 2,941 | ||||||
Net assets available for
participants benefit
|
$ | 8,426 | $ | 7,005 | ||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Value of DSUs at grant
|
$ | 22,211 | $ | 19,199 | ||||
Participant forfeitures
|
(110 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||
Change in value at period end since
date of grant
|
(826 | ) | (1,837 | ) | ||||
Value of DSUs at end of period
|
$ | 21,275 | $ | 17,252 | ||||
34
(In thousands, except unit amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Grant Date | Fair | Grant Date | |||||||||||||||||||||
Units | Value | Fair Value | Units | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
418,126 | $ | 17,252 | $ | 45.65 | 92,161 | $ | 5,722 | $ | 50.52 | ||||||||||||||
Transfer in of DSUs (value of
grants)
|
72,995 | 3,012 | 41.26 | 12,791 | 731 | 57.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation during period
|
| 1,011 | | | (1,082 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Participant forfeitures
|
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net change during period
|
72,995 | 4,023 | | 12,791 | (351 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period
|
491,121 | $ | 21,275 | $ | 45.00 | 104,952 | $ | 5,371 | $ | 51.33 | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
For the Three | ||||||||
Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 13 | $ | | ||||
Transfer in of participants
payroll deductions from the ESPP
|
87 | 56 | ||||||
Cost of common stock issued to
participants under the terms of the ESPP
|
(95 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
Net change in participants
equity
|
(8 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 5 | $ | | ||||
35
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities:
|
|||||||||
Residential loan CES
|
$ | 49,460 | $ | 58,196 | |||||
Commercial loan CES
|
8,039 | 4,676 | |||||||
Securities portfolio
|
(7,018 | ) | (6,330 | ) | |||||
Total available-for-sale securities
|
50,481 | 56,542 | |||||||
Net unrealized gains on interest
rate agreements:
|
|||||||||
Interest rate agreements accounted
for as cash flow hedges
|
31,110 | 17,189 | |||||||
Total accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
$ | 81,591 | $ | 73,731 | |||||
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | |||
2006 (last nine months)
|
683 | |||
2007
|
751 | |||
2008
|
688 | |||
2009
|
703 | |||
2010
|
703 | |||
2011 and thereafter
|
1,951 | |||
Total
|
$ | 5,479 | ||
36
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | |||
Residential real estate loans
|
$ | 5,848 | ||
Securities portfolio securities
|
5,000 | |||
Total
|
$ | 10,848 | ||
37
Item 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Statements that are not historical in nature, including
the words anticipated, estimated,
should, expect, believe,
intend, and similar expressions, are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including,
among other things, those described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 under the caption Risk
Factors. Other risks, uncertainties, and factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected are detailed from time to time in reports filed by us
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
including
Forms 10-K, 10-Q,
and 8-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise. In light of these
risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking
events mentioned, or discussed in, or incorporated by reference
into, this
Form 10-Q might
not occur. Accordingly, our actual results may differ from our
current expectations, estimates, and projections.
Important factors that may impact our actual results include
changes in interest rates and market values; changes in
prepayment rates; general economic conditions, particularly as
they affect the price of earning assets and the credit status of
borrowers; the level of liquidity in the capital markets as it
affects our ability to finance our real estate asset portfolio;
and other factors not presently identified. This
Form 10-Q contains
statistics and other data that in some cases have been obtained
from, or compiled from information made available by, servicers
and other third-party service providers.
Our primary source of revenue is interest income paid to us from
the securities and loans we own, which in turn consists of the
monthly loan payments made by homeowners (and to a lesser
degree, commercial property owners) on their real estate loans.
Our primary product focus is credit-enhancing residential and
commercial loans that are high quality. High quality
means real estate loans that typically have features such as
relatively lower
loan-to-value ratios,
borrowers with strong credit histories, and other indications of
the likelihood the loan will be paid off or the value of the
collateral will be sufficient to pay the loan in full, relative
to the range of loans within U.S. real estate markets as a
whole. We currently sponsor the securitization through our
Sequoia program of all the residential real estate loans we
acquire. We also sponsor the re-securitization through our
Acacia CDO (collateralized debt obligations) program of
investment-grade (and, to a lesser degree, non-investment grade)
real estate securities. We seek to invest in assets that have
the potential to provide for high cash flow returns over a long
period of time to help support our goal of maintaining steady
dividends over time.
Our reported GAAP net income was $28 million
($1.09 per share) for the first quarter of 2006. In the
first quarter of 2005, GAAP net income was $61 million
($2.42 per share). Our results for 2006 were not as strong
as the results we achieved in 2005, but are still at a level
that we consider acceptable. Our GAAP return on equity was 12%
for the first quarter of 2006 compared to 27% for the first
quarter of 2005. Better than expected credit results on the
loans we credit-enhance has been the primary driver of our
continued strong earnings results. For the residential real
estate loans we credit-enhance, delinquencies remain at
historically low levels and annual credit losses continue to be
less than one basis point (0.01%) of the current balance of
these loans. Credit results for the commercial real estate loans
we credit-enhance have also been excellent.
38
Table 1 Net Income
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 225,449 | $ | 237,166 | ||||
Total interest expense
|
(180,702 | ) | (175,967 | ) | ||||
Net interest income
|
44,747 | 61,199 | ||||||
Operating expenses
|
(12,102 | ) | (10,972 | ) | ||||
Net recognized gains (losses) and
valuation adjustments
|
(1,870 | ) | 15,012 | |||||
Provision for income taxes
|
(2,760 | ) | (4,677 | ) | ||||
Net income
|
$ | 28,015 | $ | 60,562 | ||||
Diluted Common Shares
|
25,702,730 | 25,020,932 | ||||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 1.09 | $ | 2.42 |
We declared regular quarterly dividends of $0.70 per share in both the first quarter of 2006 and 2005. We intend to declare and distribute the remainder of our 2005 REIT taxable income as regularly quarterly dividends by September 2006. We expect to permanently retain approximately 10% of the ordinary real estate investment trust (REIT) taxable income we earn during 2006. We also plan to retain the after-tax profits earned in our non-REIT subsidiaries. In addition, we plan to defer the distribution of a portion of our 2006 income, so that it will be distributed by September 2007. These are similar actions to those we have taken in recent years. | |
Our net discount on all consolidated residential and commercial real estate loans and securities (adjustable, fixed, and hybrid) is $650 million, or $25.62 per share outstanding, at March 31, 2006. The net discount at March 31, 2006 was $457 million, or $18.00 per share, on residential real estate assets and was $193 million, or $7.62 per share, on commercial real estate assets. We will realize this $650 million net discount as income (for the most part, over the next seven years) to the extent it is not diminished by credit losses. This income would be in addition to the coupon income and other income we earn on an ongoing basis. Faster prepayments result in our realizing this income more quickly. | |
The health of the real estate industry is cyclical. The tremendous growth in residential real estate prices appears to be slowing. We believe it is probable that residential real estate fundamentals may deteriorate over the next two years, causing our credit losses to increase but also reducing acquisition prices for the assets we seek to buy. As a result, our current plan, which is subject to change, is to invest our excess capital ($174 million at March 31, 2006) steadily over the next two years so that we maintain reduced risk levels while also maintaining cash to take advantage of potential opportunities to acquire cheaper assets. We will likely modify this plan as the market environment changes. Nevertheless, as a result of this general plan of action, it is likely that we will continue to have relatively high cash balances for some time. Our strong balance sheet, including these cash balances as well as low levels of Redwood debt, will be particularly helpful in the event that real estate credit fundamentals deteriorate significantly. | |
Our mortgage conduits residential loan securitization business is in transition. In 2005 and prior years, we generated attractive levels of economic gains (measured by our taxable gain on sale through securitization) by acquiring high-quality one- and six-month LIBOR adjustable-rate residential loans from originators, selling the loans to Sequoia securitization entities, and then sponsoring Sequoia securitizations of these loans. In todays flat to inverted yield curve environment, however, adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) indexed to London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) are not an attractive option for homeowners, causing origination volume of this product to decrease dramatically. In addition, several Wall Street firms have entered the residential conduit business, increasing competition and reducing securitization gain-on-sale opportunities. | |
We are responding to these changes by broadening our residential conduits product line (both in terms of product type and loan quality characteristics) and by expanding our mortgage originator customer base. We are focusing on market areas and relationships where we believe we have, or can develop, a competitive advantage. We expect our residential conduit business will break even economically this year while also not absorbing much capital. Even at break-even levels, |
39
our residential conduit brings multiple benefits to our business
as a whole and is an excellent source of assets for us to invest
in. In the longer term, we expect our residential conduit to
develop in a manner that will once again generate attractive
returns for our shareholders.
We continue to be large and active investors in the market for
residential credit-enhancement securities created by others, and
we continue to allocate the greater part of our capital to these
assets.
We are continuing to build our business of credit-enhancing
securitized commercial real estate loans. In the first quarter
of 2006, we acted, for the first time, as the lead buyer of
credit-enhancement securities for a new CMBS issuance. This
event marked a significant milestone in the development of our
commercial credit enhancement business.
We continue to sponsor Acacia CDO transactions and invest in the
CDO equity securities we create. The market for sponsoring CDO
securitizations continues to be attractive, although it has
become more competitive. We expect that CDO investments will
generate attractive cash flows over time. We believe that the
CDO business is an area for innovation, and we continue to
explore new ways to take advantage of these structures. In late
2005, we completed our first predominately commercial real
estate CDO. We may also incorporate synthetic assets in
Acacias asset pools. Over the next few years, we expect
our CDO sponsorship business to grow and evolve in interesting
new ways and to continue to generate attractive new investments
and asset management fees.
We seek to maintain a structured balance sheet that we believe
should allow us to weather potential general economic downturns
and liquidity crises. We generally seek to put ourselves in a
position where changes in interest rates would not be likely to
materially harm our ability to meet our long-term goals or
maintain our regular dividend rate. We use debt to finance loans
and securities that we are accumulating as inventory for sale to
securitization entities sponsored by us.
In our view, the long-term outlook for our business is good.
Housing price increases over the past several years have reduced
our risk of credit loss in the future for our existing
residential assets. For most of our residential credit risk
assets, the underlying loans were originated in 2003 and 2004.
Commercial property values and cash flows are increasing in many
areas. Our portfolio of assets as a whole has the ability to
generate attractive earnings, cash flows, and dividends in the
future, assuming real estate credit losses do not increase
materially. Over the long term, we believe it is reasonably
likely that we will be able to continue to find attractive
investment opportunities, as we are an efficient competitor and
because our market segments are growing (as the amount of real
estate loans outstanding increases and the percentage of these
loans that are securitized increases).
In general, we expect per share earnings and our special
dividend in 2006 to be lower than 2005 as a result of higher
levels of unutilized capital, a newer portfolio on average (our
seasoned assets have largely been sold or called), few gains
from sales (as we are not planning a significant amount of sales
at this time), fewer calls (as we have fewer callable assets)
continued high premium amortization expenses on the residential
loans consolidated from Sequoia trusts as these loans continue
to prepay rapidly, and for other reasons. There is a high degree
of quarter-to-quarter variability of earnings in our business
models, and short-term earnings trends should be interpreted
with care. As management, we focus on building the net present
value of future cash flows and on building our ability to
sustain our regular dividend rate. We do not focus on quarterly
earnings.
40
FIRST QUARTER 2006 AS COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER
2005
Acquisitions, Securitizations, Sales, and Calls
During the first quarter of 2006, we acquired $53 million
residential loan CES ($28 million on behalf of Acacia
and $25 million funded with equity). This was a decrease
from the $68 million we acquired in the first quarter of
2005 as we limited our asset acquisitions to preserve cash
balances as part of our capital utilization plan. The bulk of
the loans underlying the CES we acquired during 2006 continue to
be of above-average quality as compared to securitized
residential loans as a whole.
In the first quarter of 2006, none of our residential loan CES
were called. In the first quarter of 2005, we had calls of
$14 million principal value that generated GAAP gains of
$8 million. We have fewer assets that will likely become
callable during 2006 than in recent years. At the end of the
first quarter of 2006, we had residential loan CES securities
with principal value totaling $1 million that were callable.
During the first quarter of 2006, we sold $10 million
residential loan CES, generating GAAP gains of $1 million.
During the first quarter of 2005, sales of residential loan CES
totaled $27 million and generated GAAP gains of
$8 million.
We did not acquire commercial real estate loans during the first
quarter of 2006, a decrease from the $7 million acquired
during the first quarter of 2005. We did not sell any commercial
real estate loans during the first quarters of 2006 or 2005. Our
commercial real estate loan activity provides additional
collateral to the Acacia CDO securitizations we sponsor.
During the first quarter of 2006, we acquired $7 million
commercial loan CES, a decrease from the $13 million
acquired in the first quarter of 2005. Over the past year, we
have continued to increase our ability to analyze, source, and
manage commercial real estate loan CES. No commercial loan CES
were sold during the first quarters of 2006 or 2005.
In the first quarter of 2006, our residential real estate loan
acquisitions totaled $53 million. During the first quarter
of 2006, we did not sell any of these loans to Sequoia entities,
leaving us with an inventory of residential loans of
$87 million at March 31, 2006. Sequoia entities did
not issue asset-backed securities (ABS) during the first
quarter of 2006. This level of residential loan securitization
activity was a significant decrease from the first quarter of
2005 when Sequoia entities acquired loans of $0.8 billion
and issued a like amount of ABS. Historically, we typically
acquired LIBOR ARMs residential loans for the Sequoia
securitization program we sponsor. The flatter yield curve
reduced the amount of LIBOR ARM residential loans originated in
late 2005 and early 2006. However, we have been increasing our
ability to acquire other types of loans, and most of the loans
currently in inventory are hybrid loans.
We acquired $104 million of other residential and
commercial real estate securities during the first quarter of
2006 as inventory for sale to our Acacia CDO securitization
program. This was a decrease from the $168 million of these
acquisitions we made for Acacia during the first quarter of
2005. We sold securities to Acacia entities totaling
$212 million during both the first quarter of 2006 and
2005. At March 31, 2006, we had securities of
$88 million in inventory for sale to future Acacia
entities. In the first quarters of both 2006 and 2005, Acacia
entities issued $300 million CDO ABS.
Net Income
Our reported GAAP net income was $28 million
($1.09 per share) for the first quarter of 2006, a decrease
from the $61 million ($2.42 per share) earned in the
first quarter of 2005. Our GAAP return on equity was 12% for the
first quarter of 2006, compared to 27% for the first quarter of
2005.
41
The reduction in our net income of $33 million from the
first quarter of 2005 to 2006 resulted from a decrease in net
interest income of $17 million, a decrease in net gains on
sales and calls net of recognized gains (losses) and valuation
adjustments of $17 million, and an increase in operating
expenses of $1 million, and a decrease in provisions for
income taxes of $2 million.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income decreased to $45 million in the first
quarter of 2006 compared to $61 million in the first
quarter of 2005. The reduction in net interest income of
$17 million resulted primarily from an increase in the
amount of unutilized capital and increased ARM prepayments rates
on residential loans consolidated from Sequoia securitization
entities.
We are constraining our asset acquisitions in order to preserve
excess cash balances for attractive investment opportunities in
the future. Our current capital utilization plan is to invest
our remaining excess capital steadily during 2006 and 2007. The
impact of this excess capital balance on our net interest income
is likely to dampen our earnings relative to what it might have
been if we were more fully invested. We do have attractive
opportunities to invest this cash now, and we may decide to
accelerate (or slow) our acquisitions (as compared to our
current capital utilization plan) depending on market conditions.
Prepayment rates (CPR) for residential ARM loans owned by
Sequoia entities increased from an average of 25% in the first
quarter of 2005 to 45% in the first quarter of 2006. Faster
prepayments on ARMs have been caused primarily by the flatter
yield curve and the increase in popularity of negative
amortization loans. Borrowers are more inclined to refinance out
of ARMs and into hybrid or fixed rate loans when the effective
interest rates on ARMs are not significantly lower than the
fixed rate alternatives. Additionally, new forms of
adjustable-rate mortgages (negative amortization, option
ARMs, and Moving Treasury Average ARMs) represent an
increased share of the ARM market and have increased short reset
ARMs to offer types of ARMs refinancing. These faster prepayment
rates for consolidated ARM loans had a negative impact on our
net interest income in the first quarter of 2006. However, in
the long term we believe we will likely benefit from faster
residential loan prepayments due to our significant investment
in discount-priced residential loan CES that have ARM loans in
their underlying pools.
42
Interest Income
Total interest income consists of interest earned on
consolidated earning assets, plus income from amortization of
discount for assets acquired at prices below principal value,
less expenses for amortization of premium for assets acquired at
prices above principal value, less credit provision expenses on
loans.
Table 2 Interest Income and Yield
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 224,362 | $ | 236,957 | ||||
Discount amortization
|
14,661 | 9,316 | ||||||
Premium amortization
|
(13,398 | ) | (8,082 | ) | ||||
Provision for credit losses
|
(176 | ) | (1,025 | ) | ||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 225,449 | $ | 237,166 | ||||
Average earning assets
|
$ | 15,229,791 | $ | 24,042,562 | ||||
Yield as a result of:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
5.89 | % | 3.94 | % | ||||
Discount amortization
|
0.38 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||
Premium amortization
|
(0.35 | )% | (0.13 | )% | ||||
Provision for credit losses
|
(0.00 | )% | (0.01 | )% | ||||
Yield on earning assets
|
5.92 | % | 3.95 | % | ||||
Interest income decreased to $225 million in the first quarter of 2006 from $237 million in the first quarter of 2005 primarily due to a decrease in our consolidated residential real estate loans. These loans have prepaid at increasingly faster rates, and we have not acquired many new loans to replace them. | |
Higher short-term interest rates have served to partially offset the impact on interest income of the lower balance of assets. Most of our consolidated assets are adjustable rate loans tied to one- and six-month LIBOR. The rise in these rates over the past year has resulted in a significant increase in the average yield we are earning on consolidated assets. | |
Increases in both the amount of and yields on residential loan CES and the securities portfolio helped to offset the overall decline in interest income. Yields on commercial loan CES are low as a result of our future loss assumptions, and were particularly low in the first quarter of 2006 as a result of a reduction in related interest expense due to charge off of certain due diligence expenses. |
43
Table 3 Interest Income and Yield by Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Percent of | ||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||||
Income | Income | Balance | Yield | |||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans, net
of provision for credit losses
|
$ | 165,664 | 73.48 | % | $ | 12,542,519 | 5.28 | % | ||||||||
Residential loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
27,748 | 12.31 | % | 560,191 | 19.81 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial loans, net of provision
for credit losses
|
1,238 | 0.55 | % | 56,777 | 8.72 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
759 | 0.34 | % | 56,800 | 5.34 | % | ||||||||||
Securities portfolio
|
27,563 | 12.23 | % | 1,769,502 | 6.23 | % | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
2,477 | 1.09 | % | 244,002 | 4.06 | % | ||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 225,449 | 100.00 | % | $ | 15,229,791 | 5.92 | % | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Percent of | ||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||||
Income | Income | Balance | Yield | |||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans, net
of provision for credit losses
|
$ | 197,435 | 83.26 | % | $ | 21,925,643 | 3.60 | % | ||||||||
Residential loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
19,624 | 8.27 | % | 493,412 | 15.91 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial loans, net of provision
for credit losses
|
1,587 | 0.67 | % | 56,080 | 11.32 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
356 | 0.15 | % | 19,255 | 7.40 | % | ||||||||||
Securities portfolio
|
17,584 | 7.41 | % | 1,423,487 | 4.94 | % | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
580 | 0.24 | % | 124,685 | 1.86 | % | ||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 237,166 | 100.00 | % | $ | 24,042,562 | 3.95 | % | ||||||||
The table below details our interest income by portfolio as a result of changes in consolidated asset balances (volume) and yield (rate) for the first quarter of 2006 as compared to the first quarter of 2005. |
Table 4 Volume and Rate Changes for Interest Income |
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Change in Interest Income for | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2006 Versus 2005 | ||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Change | ||||||||||
Residential real estate loans, net
of provision for credit losses
|
$ | (84,493 | ) | $ | 52,722 | $ | (31,771 | ) | ||||
Residential loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
2,656 | 5,468 | 8,124 | |||||||||
Commercial loans, net of provision
for credit losses
|
20 | (369 | ) | (349 | ) | |||||||
Commercial loan credit-enhancement
securities
|
694 | (291 | ) | 403 | ||||||||
Securities portfolio
|
4,274 | 5,705 | 9,979 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
555 | 1,342 | 1,897 | |||||||||
Total interest income
|
$ | (76,294 | ) | $ | 64,577 | $ | (11,717 | ) | ||||
Volume change is the change in average portfolio balance between periods multiplied by the rate earned in the earlier period. Rate change is the change in rate between periods multiplied by the average portfolio balance in the prior period. Interest income changes that result from changes in both rate and volume were allocated to the rate change amounts shown in the table. |
44
A discussion of the changes in total income, average balances,
and yields for each of our portfolios is provided below.
Table 5 Consolidated Residential Real Estate
Loans Interest Income and Yield
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 177,880 | $ | 206,289 | ||||
Net premium amortization
|
(12,075 | ) | (7,644 | ) | ||||
Provision for credit losses
|
(141 | ) | (1,210 | ) | ||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 165,664 | $ | 197,435 | ||||
Average consolidated residential
real estate loans
|
$ | 12,542,519 | $ | 21,925,643 | ||||
Yields as a result of:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
5.67 | % | 3.76 | % | ||||
Net premium amortization
|
(0.39 | )% | (0.14 | )% | ||||
Provision for credit losses
|
(0.00 | )% | (0.02 | )% | ||||
Yield
|
5.28 | % | 3.60 | % | ||||
Interest income on residential real estate loans decreased primarily as a result of lower balance of loans as our existing portfolio prepaid and acquisitions of new loans were at a very slow pace. Offsetting this decrease in consolidated balances was the effect of higher short-term interest rates. Almost all these loans have coupon rates that adjust monthly or every six months based on the one- or six-month LIBOR interest rate. Thus, yields on these residential real estate loans increased as short-term interest rates rose. | |
Higher premium amortization expenses (as a percentage of current loan balances) in the first quarter of 2006 were caused primarily by increasing prepayment speeds on these loans. However, due to rising short-term rates, the amount of the premium amortization was not as great as it might otherwise have been. As a result, our cost basis in the remaining loans increased from the prior quarter and the amortization expense in future quarters may increase significantly, especially during a period of falling interest rates. |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 14,593 | $ | 10,897 | ||||
Net discount amortization
|
13,155 | 8,727 | ||||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 27,748 | $ | 19,624 | ||||
Average residential loan
credit-enhancement securities
|
$ | 560,191 | $ | 493,412 | ||||
Yield as a result of:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
10.42 | % | 8.84 | % | ||||
Net discount amortization
|
9.39 | % | 7.07 | % | ||||
Yield
|
19.81 | % | 15.91 | % | ||||
Interest income recognized from residential loan CES increased due to growth in our portfolio over the past year and increased average yields. Portfolio growth reflected our ability to find new assets at a pace in excess of our sales, calls, and principal prepayments. Yields increased as our portfolio is beginning to season and benefit from a period of favorable prepayment rates and continued strong credit performance. In addition, asset sales during 2005 of lower-yielding assets increased our average yield for the first quarter of 2006. | |
To determine yields on residential loan CES, we make assumptions regarding loan losses and prepayments. Since the market generally has a wide range for these assumptions (and not a specific estimate), we apply assumptions within a range that generally results in yields on these |
45
assets in early periods of ownership that are lower than what we
might realize over the life of the assets if future performance
turns out to be better than the low range of our expectations.
Specifically, the initial yield we book on newly acquired
residential loan CES may be lower than the market mid-range
expectation of performance (and below our hurdle rate of 14%
pre-tax and pre-overhead internal rate of return). We review the
actual performance of each residential loan CES and the
markets and our renewed range of expectations every
quarter. We adjust the yields of assets as a result of
supportable changes in market conditions and anticipated
performance. In addition, to the extent we credit-enhance loans
with special credit risks (e.g., negative amortization loans),
we may not recognize interest income that is not paid currently.
We make ongoing determinations of the likelihood that any
deferred interest payments will be collectible in recognizing
current period yields.
(Dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 1,180 | $ | 1,431 | ||||
Net discount
(premium) amortization
|
93 | (29 | ) | |||||
(Provision for) reversal of credit
losses
|
(35 | ) | 185 | |||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 1,238 | $ | 1,587 | ||||
Average earning assets
|
$ | 56,777 | $ | 56,080 | ||||
Yield as a result of:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
8.31 | % | 10.21 | % | ||||
Net discount
(premium) amortization
|
0.66 | % | (0.21 | )% | ||||
(Provision for) reversal of credit
losses
|
(0.25 | )% | 1.32 | % | ||||
Yield
|
8.72 | % | 11.32 | % | ||||
The interest income earned on our commercial real estate loan portfolio decreased due to a change in the loans within this portfolio, as loans with higher yields were paid off and new loans acquired had lower yields. |
(Dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 2,265 | $ | 765 | ||||
Net premium amortization
|
(1,276 | ) | (409 | ) | ||||
Interest income before due
diligence costs
|
989 | 356 | ||||||
Due diligence costs
|
(230 | ) | | |||||
Total interest income after due
diligence costs
|
$ | 759 | $ | 356 | ||||
Average commercial loan
credit-enhancement securities
|
$ | 56,800 | $ | 19,255 | ||||
Yield as a result of:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
15.95 | % | 15.90 | % | ||||
Net premium amortization
|
(8.99 | )% | (8.50 | )% | ||||
Yield before due diligence costs
|
6.96 | % | 7.40 | % | ||||
Due diligence costs
|
(1.62 | )% | | |||||
Yield after due diligence costs
|
5.34 | % | 7.40 | % | ||||
Interest income recognized from commercial loan CES increased due to the growth in this portfolio. This increase was partially offset by lower yields on newer commercial loan CES. The yield on commercial loan CES is based on our projected cash flows over time and includes due diligence costs that are expensed as incurred. These due diligence costs are incurred as part of our acquisition of a first-loss security. The costs, relative to the investment, are small; however, relative to our quarterly interest income the due diligence costs can have a significant impact on our reported yield. The incurrence of due diligence costs will continue to cause some volatility of our yields in this portfolio. We acquire commercial loan CES at a discount and we designate a portion of the discount as credit protection (discount balances that are not being amortized into |
46
income) based on the anticipated losses in the underlying pool
of loans. Since these commercial loan CES are the first
loss pieces, anticipated credit losses (the amount of designated
credit protection) may exceed the amount of the net discount. In
this case we write down our basis in this asset over time. In
order to do so, we recognize on-going amortization expenses even
though we acquired the asset at a discount to principal value.
Over time, if the loans underlying these commercial
loan CES perform better than we originally expected, we
would re-designate a portion of the credit protection to
accretable discount, thereby increasing the yield recognized on
these assets by reducing any amortization expenses or increasing
discount amortization income.
The terms of our commercial CES differ from residential CES in
that we generally do not receive principal on our investment
until the end of the note term (typically seven to ten years).
Our commercial portfolio is performing well; the fundamentals of
the commercial business are doing well, and we expect over time
that our returns on our commercial CES investments should meet
our hurdle rate of 14%. However, for GAAP purposes, our
recognized yields may not approach this rate until later in the
life of the investment as the accretion of the discount into
income is slower in the earlier years, given the uncertainty of
future events. Since most of our existing commercial CES are
newer investments, the overall yield on this portfolio is
currently lower than we might expect if credit performance meets
or exceeds our long-term estimates.
(Dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 26,197 | $ | 16,994 | ||||
Discount amortization
|
1,413 | 692 | ||||||
Premium amortization
|
(47 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 27,563 | $ | 17,584 | ||||
Average securities portfolio balance
|
$ | 1,769,502 | $ | 1,423,487 | ||||
Yield as a result of:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
5.92 | % | 4.78 | % | ||||
Discount amortization
|
0.32 | % | 0.19 | % | ||||
Premium amortization
|
(0.01 | )% | (0.03 | )% | ||||
Yield
|
6.23 | % | 4.94 | % | ||||
Total interest income increased for the securities portfolio as the total size of the portfolio grew and as yields increased. Yields increased as the coupon rates on adjustable-rate loan securities (which comprise over half of the portfolio) adjusted upward with the increase in short-term interest rates. |
Interest Expense |
Interest expense consists of interest payments on Redwood debt and consolidated ABS issued from sponsored securitization entities, plus amortization of deferred ABS issuance costs and expenses related to certain interest rate agreements less the amortization of ABS issuance premiums. ABS issuance premiums are created when IO securities and other ABS are issued at prices greater than principal value. | |
Total consolidated interest expense increased as a result of a higher cost of funds due to an increase in short-term interest rates as most of our debt and consolidated ABS issued is indexed to one-, three-, or six-month LIBOR. Offsetting most of the impact of this rise in short term rates was the significant decline in average balance of debt and consolidated ABS issued that was outstanding over this past year. |
47
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest expense on Redwood debt
|
$ | 2,097 | $ | 2,728 | ||||
Interest expense on ABS issued
|
178,605 | 173,239 | ||||||
Total interest expense
|
$ | 180,702 | $ | 175,967 | ||||
Average Redwood debt balance
|
$ | 137,181 | $ | 277,423 | ||||
Average ABS issued balance
|
14,663,134 | 23,324,111 | ||||||
Average total obligations
|
$ | 14,800,315 | $ | 23,601,534 | ||||
Cost of funds of Redwood debt
|
6.11 | % | 3.93 | % | ||||
Cost of funds of ABS issued
|
4.87 | % | 2.97 | % | ||||
Cost of funds of total obligations
|
4.88 | % | 2.98 | % |
For purposes of calculating the weighted average borrowing costs of ABS issued, we include the amortization of the deferred ABS issuance costs with interest expense. We include the average deferred ABS issuance costs in the average balances below. |
Table 11 Average Balances of Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Sequoia
|
$ | 12,479,058 | $ | 21,620,986 | ||||
Acacia
|
2,231,939 | 1,751,904 | ||||||
Commercial
|
4,234 | 11,705 | ||||||
Average balance of ABS issued
|
14,715,231 | 23,384,595 | ||||||
Average deferred ABS issuance costs
|
(52,097 | ) | (60,484 | ) | ||||
Average balance of ABS issued, net
|
$ | 14,663,134 | $ | 23,324,111 | ||||
The table below details interest expense on debt and consolidated ABS issued as a result of changes in consolidated balances (volume) and cost of funds (rate) for the first quarter of 2006 as compared to 2005. |
Table 12 Volume and Rate Changes for Interest Expense |
(In thousands) | Changes in Interest Expense | |||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 Versus 2005 | ||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Change | ||||||||||
Interest expense on Redwood debt
|
$ | (1,379 | ) | $ | 748 | $ | (631 | ) | ||||
Interest expense on ABS issued
|
(64,329 | ) | 69,695 | 5,366 | ||||||||
Total interest expense
|
$ | (65,708 | ) | $ | 70,443 | $ | 4,735 | |||||
Details of the change in cost of funds of debt and consolidated ABS issued are provided in the tables below. |
Table 13 Cost of Funds of Redwood Debt |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest expense on Redwood debt
|
$ | 2,097 | $ | 2,728 | ||||
Average Redwood debt balance
|
$ | 137,181 | $ | 277,423 | ||||
Cost of funds of Redwood debt
|
6.11 | % | 3.93 | % |
48
The decrease in the cost of funds of Redwood debt is the result
of lower average balance of debt outstanding, offset by higher
short-term interest rates.
Table 14 Cost of Funds of Asset-Backed Securities
Issued
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
ABS issued interest expense
|
$ | 178,204 | $ | 173,182 | ||||
ABS issuance expense amortization
|
5,907 | 5,273 | ||||||
Net ABS interest rate agreement
(income) expense
|
(2,980 | ) | (1,469 | ) | ||||
Net ABS issuance premium
amortization
|
(2,526 | ) | (3,747 | ) | ||||
Total ABS issued interest expense
|
$ | 178,605 | $ | 173,239 | ||||
Average balance of ABS
|
$ | 14,663,134 | $ | 23,324,111 | ||||
ABS interest expense
|
4.86 | % | 2.97 | % | ||||
ABS issuance expense amortization
|
0.16 | % | 0.09 | % | ||||
Net ABS interest rate agreement
income
|
(0.08 | )% | (0.03 | )% | ||||
Net ABS issuance premium
amortization
|
(0.07 | )% | (0.06 | )% | ||||
Cost of funds of issued ABS
|
4.87 | % | 2.97 | % | ||||
The coupon payments on the consolidated ABS issued are primarily indexed to one-, three-, and six-month LIBOR. Over the past year, short-term interest rates have risen and, thus, so has the cost of funds of the consolidated ABS issued by securitization entities consolidated on our reported balance sheet. Offsetting this increase was the reduced average balance of our ABS issued that was outstanding as prepayments on the loan collateral exceeded the rate at which we issued new ABS. |
Total operating expenses increased by 10% from the first quarter of 2005 to 2006 due to investments in systems and infrastructure and increases in the scale and complexity of our operations. Some of our current expenses include certain initiatives that will be completed during this year, so we anticipate the recent growth in our expenses to slow down. The reconciliation of GAAP operating expense to operating expense before excise tax and variable stock option income (or expense) is provided in the table below. |
Table 15 Operating Expenses |
(Dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 12,102 | $ | 10,972 | ||||
Less: Excise tax
|
(295 | ) | (307 | ) | ||||
Less: Variable stock option
income/(expense) (VSOI/ VSOE)
|
| 84 | ||||||
Total operating expenses before
excise tax and VSOE/VSOI
|
$ | 11,807 | $ | 10,749 | ||||
Components of total operating
expense before excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI Fixed compensation
expense
|
$ | 3,437 | $ | 2,778 | ||||
Other operating expense
|
4,162 | 3,322 | ||||||
Equity compensation expense
|
2,694 | 631 | ||||||
Variable compensation expense
|
1,514 | 4,018 | ||||||
Total operating expenses before
excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI
|
$ | 11,807 | $ | 10,749 | ||||
Net interest income (NII)
|
$ | 44,747 | $ | 61,199 | ||||
Operating efficiency ratio
(Operating expense before excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI)/net
interest income
|
26 | % | 18 | % |
Our operating costs continue to increase in part because of increased personnel needs resulting from both prior and anticipated growth and from the development and evolution of our two newer operating groups (commercial and CDO), as we further professionalize our finance and |
49
information technology staffs, and as we develop an increased
capability to pursue new business and corporate transaction
opportunities. Our operating efficiency ratio was higher in the
first quarter of 2006 than in 2005 due to rising expenses at a
time when net interest income has declined from the
extraordinary levels achieved in recent years. Total operating
expenses in 2006 are likely to be higher than in 2005.
We exclude excise tax and variable option expense or income
(VSOE/ VSOI) in determining the efficiency ratio. By excluding
these items, management believes that we are providing a
performance measure comparable to measures commonly used by
other companies in our industry because these two types of
excluded expenses do not reflect ongoing costs of
day-to-day operations
of our company. Stock option grant expenses under FAS 123R,
however, are an on-going expense and are included in operating
expense before excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI.
Excise tax is a function of the timing of dividend
distributions. In years when we delay distributing dividends on
a portion of our REIT taxable income, under the REIT tax rules,
we may pay excise taxes on a portion of this delayed
distribution. Excise tax is included in operating expenses on
our Consolidated Statements of Income.
With the adoption of Financial Accounting Statement
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R),
effective January 1, 2006, we will no longer have VSOE/
VSOI in 2006 and beyond. In prior periods, VSOE/ VSOI was a
non-cash expense or income item that varied as a function of
Redwoods stock price. If our stock price increased during
a quarter and the stock price was above the exercise price of a
small number of our options that were deemed
variable due to their structural features, we
recorded a GAAP expense in that period equal to the increase in
the stock price times the number of
in-the-money
variable options that remained outstanding. If our
stock price decreased during a quarter, we recorded income in
that period equal to the decrease in the stock price times the
number of in-the-money
variable options that remained outstanding.
Fixed compensation expenses include employee salaries and
related employee benefits. Other operating expenses include
office costs, systems, legal and accounting fees, and other
business expenses. We expect to continue to make significant
investments in expanding our product lines and business units
and developing our business processes and information
technologies. As a result, we expect these fixed and other
operating expenses will continue to increase over time.
Equity compensation expense includes the amortized cost of
equity awards. This amount increased beginning January 1,
2006, as a result of the adoption of FAS 123R and due to
the fact that substantially all of our equity awards recently
granted are restricted shares or DSUs. The value at grant of all
these awards is expensed over the vesting period, which is
typically four years or less.
Variable compensation includes employee bonuses (which are based
on the adjusted return on equity earned by Redwood and, to a
lesser degree, on individual performance) and, in periods prior
to 2006, DER expenses on options then outstanding and granted
prior to December 31, 2002. The primary drivers of this
expense are the profitability (return on equity) of Redwood,
taxable income at the REIT (which determines total dividend
distribution requirements), the number of employees, and the
number of stock awards outstanding that receive DER payments
that were expensed (options granted prior to January 1,
2003).
For the first quarter of 2006, our net recognized losses and
valuation adjustments totaled $1.9 million as compared to
net recognized gains of $15.0 million for the first quarter
of 2005. There were no realized gains due to calls during the
first quarter of 2006, compared to $7.5 million call gains
in the first quarter of 2005, as we had fewer securities that
had reached their call factor. Gains on sales we initiated as
part of our portfolio restructuring were lower in the first
quarter of 2006 at $1.0 million, compared to
$8.3 million in the first quarter of 2005.
50
Accounting rules (FAS 115, EITF 99-20, and
SAB 5(m)) require us to review the projected discounted
cash flows on certain of our assets (based on credit,
prepayment, and other assumptions), and to
mark-to-market through
our income statement those assets that have experienced any
deterioration in discounted projected cash flows (as compared to
the previous projection) that could indicate
other-than-temporary impairment as defined by GAAP. Generally,
assets with reduced projected cash flows are written down in
value (through a non-cash income statement charge) if the
current market value for that asset is below our current basis.
If the market value is above our basis, our basis remains
unchanged and there is no gain recognized in income. It is
difficult to predict the timing or magnitude of these
adjustments; the quarterly adjustment could be substantial.
Under the accounting rules (FAS 115, EITF 99-20, and
SAB 5(m)), we recognized other-than-temporary impairments
of $3.2 million for the first quarter of 2006 and
$0.4 million for the first quarter of 2005.
In the first quarter of 2006, a portion of the
other-than-temporary impairments were realized due in part to
our decision to call Acacia CDO 2. We will likely complete this
call in the second quarter of 2006 and we plan on selling many
of the underlying assets and interest rate agreements at that
time. For GAAP, we recorded a $2 million negative market
valuation adjustment at this time for the assets that had market
values less than our book values. Upon the call in the second
quarter, we will likely realize net gains from the sale of
assets with market values in excess of our book values.
Some of our interest rate agreements are accounted for as
trading instruments. As a result, we recognized gains of
$0.3 million in 2006 and losses of $0.5 million in the
first quarter of 2005 on these interest rate agreements.
As a REIT, we are required to distribute to our stockholders at
least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year. Therefore, we
generally pass through substantially all of our earnings to
stockholders without paying federal income tax at the corporate
level. We pay income tax on the REIT taxable income we retain
and the income we earn at our taxable non-REIT subsidiaries.
Taxable income calculations differ from GAAP income
calculations. We provide for income taxes for GAAP purposes
based on our estimates of our taxable income, the amount of
taxable income we permanently retain, and the taxable income we
estimate was earned at our taxable subsidiaries.
Our income tax provision in the first quarter of 2006 was
$2.8 million, a decrease from the $4.7 million income
tax provision taken in the first quarter of 2005. In previous
years, we generated taxable
gains-on-sales from our
securitization activities at the taxable subsidiaries. Since
these securitizations were treated as financings under GAAP,
deferred tax assets were created. The deferred tax assets are
amortized through the deferred tax provision as the related GAAP
income is recognized. In the first quarter of 2005,
substantially more of the income was generated than at the first
quarter of 2006, and, accordingly, more of the deferred tax
asset was amortized during the earlier period.
51
Taxable Income and Dividends
Total taxable income is not a measure calculated in accordance
with GAAP. It is the pre-tax income calculated for tax purposes.
Estimated total taxable income is an important measure as it is
the basis of our dividend distributions to shareholders. Taxable
income calculations differ significantly from GAAP income
calculations. REIT taxable income is that portion of our taxable
income that we earn in our parent (REIT) company and its
REIT subsidiaries. It does not include taxable income earned in
taxable non-REIT subsidiaries. We must distribute at least 90%
of our REIT taxable income as dividends to shareholders each
year. As a REIT we are not subject to corporate income taxes on
the REIT taxable income we distribute. We pay income tax on the
REIT taxable income we retain (we can retain up to 10% of the
total). The remainder of our taxable income is income we earn in
taxable subsidiaries. We pay income tax on this income and
retain the after-tax income at the subsidiary level. The table
below reconciles GAAP net income to total taxable income and
REIT taxable income for the first quarters of 2006 and 2005.
Table 16 Differences Between GAAP Net Income and Total
Taxable and REIT Taxable Income
(In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
GAAP net income
|
$ | 28,015 | $ | 60,562 | |||||
GAAP/Tax differences in accounting
for:
|
|||||||||
Interest income and interest expense
|
5,765 | (19,889 | ) | ||||||
Credit losses
|
(826 | ) | 587 | ||||||
Operating expenses
|
1,604 | 2,019 | |||||||
Gains (losses) and valuation
adjustments
|
2,613 | 2,918 | |||||||
Provisions for taxes
|
(703 | ) | 134 | ||||||
Total taxable income (pre-tax)
|
36,468 | 46,331 | |||||||
Earnings from taxable subsidiaries
|
(1,087 | ) | (1,170 | ) | |||||
REIT taxable income (pre-tax)
|
$ | 35,381 | $ | 45,161 | |||||
GAAP net income per share
|
$ | 1.09 | $ | 2.42 | |||||
Total taxable income per share
|
$ | 1.44 | $ | 1.89 | |||||
REIT taxable income per share
|
$ | 1.39 | $ | 1.84 |
Total taxable income per share and REIT taxable income per share are measured as the estimated pretax total taxable income and REIT taxable income, respectively, earned in a calendar quarter divided by the number of shares outstanding at the end of that quarter. Annual total taxable income per share and annual REIT taxable income per share are the sum of the four quarterly total taxable income per share and REIT taxable income per share calculations, respectively. | |
Total taxable income and total taxable income per share decreased in the first quarter 2006 from the first quarter of 2005. The primary reason for this decrease was a lower amount of capital invested in assets and fewer gains on sales on securitizations (at the taxable subsidiaries) as a result of a lower volume of securitizations and less gain per transaction. Tax recognition of the negative impact from fast prepayments on our Sequoia IOs has lagged GAAP. For technical tax accounting reasons, we are not permitted under certain circumstances to amortize our cost basis on our IOs generally until the underlying securitization is called. The cumulative difference between GAAP and tax as of March 31, 2006 is $41 million. We expect to call a number of Sequoia securitization entities over the next few years and much of this difference would then be recognized as an expense against our taxable income. These losses would likely be partially or fully offset by gains on sales of the underlying loans following the call. | |
For tax purposes, we do not anticipate credit losses, and, thus, begin accreting our discount into income on CES. For GAAP purposes, we do anticipate credit losses and thus the accretion of our discount may be deferred until credit performance outlook improves. As a result, our taxable |
52
income recognition is faster for our CES, especially in the
early years. At March 31, 2006, the cumulative difference
in GAAP and tax bases on our CES was $57 million.
Based on our estimates of 2005 and first quarter of 2006 REIT
taxable income, at March 31, 2006 we had $65 million
of undistributed REIT taxable income which we will pay as
regular dividends to our stockholders during 2006 and through
September 2007. Our quarterly estimates of taxable income and
REIT taxable income are subject to change over the year as we
refine our annual income calculations and due to changes in
applicable income tax laws and regulations.
As of March 31, 2006, we had met all of the dividend
distribution requirements of a REIT. We generally attempt to
avoid acquiring assets or structuring financings or sales at the
REIT level that would be likely to generate distributions of
Unrelated Business Taxable Income (UBTI) or excess inclusion
income to our stockholders, or that would cause prohibited
transaction taxes on us; however, there can be no assurance that
we will be successful in doing so.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Impact of Hurricanes in 2005
During the third quarter of 2005, hurricanes Katrina and Rita
hit the Gulf Coast States, including parts of Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas. We own both residential and commercial
securities that have first loss risk on loans in the affected
areas. Based on available information and our analysis, we
believe our hurricane-related losses (as measured for tax) will
be up to $6 million on the residential and commercial loans
we credit-enhance. This is lower than our initial estimates that
ranged between $6 million and $18 million. We update
our estimates as we obtain additional information and adjust our
credit reserves accordingly. There can be no assurance that
actual losses will fall within this range as there are many
factors yet to be determined including insurance claims, the
ongoing state of the local economies, and the general strength
or weakness of the real estate markets in the affected areas.
Assets
Each of our product lines and portfolios is a component of our
single business of investing in, credit-enhancing, and
securitizing residential and commercial real estate loans and
securities. Our consolidated earning assets, as presented for
GAAP purposes, consist of five portfolios: residential real
estate loans, residential loan CES, commercial real estate
loans, commercial loan CES, and securities portfolio. A
discussion of the activities in each of these portfolios appears
below.
Residential Real Estate Loans
Residential loans shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
include loans owned by securitization entities we have sponsored
plus loans we own (typically on a temporary basis prior to sale
to a securitization entity). Loans underlying residential CES we
have acquired from securitizations that were not sponsored by us
do not appear on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The consolidated balance of residential real estate loans at
March 31, 2006 of $12.0 billion was lower than the
$13.9 billion we reported at December 31, 2005.
Prepayments on loans consolidated for GAAP purposes were greater
than acquisitions of new loans. This was the result of both an
increase in prepayment speeds and a decrease in the volume of
acquisitions and sponsored securitizations. Prepayment speeds
increased in ARMs as a result of a flattening of the yield curve
(an increase in short-term interest rates relative to long-term
interest rates). This change in the yield curve also served to
reduce the new production of adjustable-rate loans indexed to
LIBOR in the marketplace, reducing our acquisition
opportunities. In addition, we face increased competition to
purchase these loans.
53
At March 31, 2006, Redwood owned $87 million
residential real estate loans accumulated for future
securitizations or whole loan sale. None of these loans were
pledged to support Redwood debt. ABS securitization entities
consolidated on Redwoods balance sheet owned
$11.9 billion of residential real estate loans on
March 31, 2006.
Charge-offs (credit losses) recorded in this portfolio totaled
$0.4 million during the first quarter of 2006 and
$0.2 million in the first quarter of 2005. Credit losses
remained at an annualized rate of less than 1 basis point
(0.01%) during these periods. Serious delinquencies increased
from $37 million at December 31, 2005 to
$50 million at March 31, 2006. Serious delinquencies
include loans delinquent more than 90 days, in bankruptcy,
in foreclosure, and real estate owned. As a percentage of this
loan portfolio, serious delinquencies remained at low levels
relative to the U.S. residential real estate loans as a
whole, and were 0.42% of our current loan balances at
March 31, 2006, an increase from 0.27% at December 31,
2005.
The reserve for credit losses on residential real estate loans
is included as a component of residential real estate loans on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The residential real estate
loan credit reserve balance of $22 million was 0.19% of the
current balance of this portfolio at March 31, 2006,
compared to $23 million, or 0.16% of the current balance,
at December 31, 2005. The total amount of credit reserves
did not decrease over the quarter even though the balance of
loans decreased; the decline in loan balance was offset by
increased delinquencies and a worsening credit outlook.
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities
For GAAP purposes, this portfolio includes residential real
estate loan CES acquired from securitizations sponsored by
others. It does not include CES we acquired from our Sequoia
entities.
We mark residential loan CES to their current estimated market
value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (but not generally
through our consolidated statements of income unless we
determine there is other-than-temporary impairment). At
March 31, 2006, our reported ownership of these residential
loan CES totaled $644 million. This was an increase from
the $613 million market value we reported on
December 31, 2005. Our acquisitions plus net positive
market value adjustments exceeded calls, sales, and principal
pay downs for the first quarter of 2006.
54
As a result of the concentrated credit risk associated with
residential loan CES, we are generally able to acquire these
securities at a discount to their face (principal) value.
The difference between the principal value ($1.09 billion)
and adjusted cost basis ($594 million) of these residential
loan CES at March 31, 2006 was $493 million. Of this
difference, $374 million was designated as internal credit
protection (reflecting our estimate of likely credit losses
on the underlying loans over the life of these securities),
while the remaining $119 million represented a purchase
discount we are accruing into income over time. The table below
presents the principal value, amortized cost, and carrying
values of our consolidated residential loan CES by first-,
second-, or third loss position. The first- and second-loss
position residential loan CES are generally funded with equity.
The third-loss position residential loan CES are generally owned
by the Acacia entities and consolidated on our balance sheets.
Table 17 Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement
Securities
(In thousands) | March 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
First loss position, principal value
|
$ | 481,681 | $ | 471,079 | ||||
Second loss position, principal
value
|
187,268 | 170,928 | ||||||
Third loss position, principal value
|
418,186 | 393,867 | ||||||
Total principal value
|
$ | 1,087,135 | $ | 1,035,874 | ||||
First loss position, amortized cost
|
$ | 115,164 | $ | 111,264 | ||||
Second loss position, amortized cost
|
122,181 | 109,306 | ||||||
Third loss position, amortized cost
|
357,019 | 333,883 | ||||||
Total amortized cost
|
$ | 594,364 | $ | 554,453 | ||||
First loss position, carrying value
|
$ | 148,399 | $ | 154,930 | ||||
Second loss position, carrying value
|
136,088 | 120,690 | ||||||
Third loss position, carrying value
|
359,336 | 337,029 | ||||||
Total carrying value
|
$ | 643,823 | $ | 612,649 | ||||
As a net result of our acquisition, sale, and call activity, and prepayments, the loans underlying these reported residential loan CES increased from $170 billion at December 31, 2005 to $181 billion at March 31, 2006. Total residential loans credit-enhanced through these securities, plus similar CES securities acquired from Sequoia securitization entities, were $184 billion at December 31, 2005 and $192 billion at March 31, 2006. | |
External credit protection serves to protect us from credit losses on a specific asset basis and represents the principal value of interests owned by others that are junior to interests owned by us. At March 31, 2006, we had $128 million of external credit-enhancement and $374 million of internally designated credit protection for this portfolio. The combined balance of external and internally designated credit protection represented 28 basis points (0.28%) of the $181 billion of loans underlying our credit-enhancement portfolio. The amount of credit protection and the related risks are specific to each credit-enhancement interest. | |
There were $2.6 million credit losses for the underlying loans during the first quarter of 2006 and $1.2 million credit losses during the first quarter of 2005. The annualized rate of credit loss was less than 1 basis point (0.01%) of the current balance of underlying loans. No losses were borne by external credit-enhancement for the first quarters of both 2006 and 2005 and all losses were borne by us, reducing that portion of the purchase discount that we had designated as credit reserves. | |
Delinquencies (over 90 days, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and real estate owned (REO)) in the underlying portfolio of residential loans that we credit-enhance through owning these CES were $426 million at March 31, 2006, an increase from $331 million at December 31, 2005. Delinquencies as a percentage of the residential loans we credit-enhance increased to 0.24% at March 31, 2006 from 0.19% at December 31, 2005. The level of delinquencies on these loans is below national levels. |
55
In the first quarter of 2006, we did not recognize losses due to
other-than-temporary impairment on our residential loan CES. We
recognized under $0.1 million of other-than-temporary
impairments on our residential loan CES for the first quarter of
2005. These losses are included in net recognized gains (losses)
and valuation adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Commercial Real Estate Loans
We have been investing in commercial real estate loans since
1998. Our commercial real estate loan portfolio decreased to
$55 million at March 31, 2006 from $60 million at
December 31, 2005 due to principal pay-downs of
$5 million, resulting from the pay-off of one loan. We plan
to continue to make additional investments in commercial real
estate loans, including mezzanine loans, subordinated (junior or
second lien) loans, and
B-Notes
(B-Notes represent a
structured commercial real estate loan that retains a higher
portion of the credit risk and generates a higher yield than the
initial loan).
Factors particular to each commercial loan (e.g., lease
activity, market rents, and local economic conditions) could
cause credit concerns, and may require us to provide for future
losses by establishing a credit reserve. We continually monitor
and determine the level of appropriate reserves for our
commercial loans. At March 31, 2006, we had an
$8.1 million reserve on a loan, which is the same reserve
we had established at acquisition of this loan. We acquired this
loan at a discount to par and designated a credit reserve based
on our expected cash flows at that time. We have no credit
reserves for other commercial real estate loans.
Commercial Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities
We acquire unrated first-loss interests in commercial
mortgage-based securities (CMBS) and fund them with equity. We
define these non-rated CMBS as commercial loan CES. At
March 31, 2006, we owned $199 million of principal
value of these securities with a market value of
$67 million. As a result of acquisitions, this was an
increase from the $175 million principal value and
$58 million market value we owned at December 31,
2005. Some of the commercial loan CES we own represent interests
in a commercial CMBS re-REMIC consisting primarily of
first-and-second-loss interests in several other CMBS.
At March 31, 2006, we credit-enhanced $28 billion
commercial real estate loans through ownership of first-loss
CMBS (excluding the re-REMIC interests), an increase from the
$26 billion commercial real estate loans we credit-enhanced
at December 31, 2005. Serious delinquencies (i.e., 90 plus
days, in bankruptcy, in foreclosure, or REO) were
$23 million, or 0.08%, of the loan balances, at
March 31, 2006. This was an increase from the
$17 million, or 0.07%, at December 31, 2005. We
incurred no credit losses on these underlying loans in the first
quarter of 2006 or 2005.
At both March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we
credit-enhanced $17 billion commercial real estate loans
through our interests in a CMBS re-REMIC. Delinquencies on these
loans were $220 million, or 1.33% of the loan balances at
March 31, 2006. Delinquencies on these loans were
$228 million, or 1.34% of the loan balances at
December 31, 2005. External credit protection on these
loans was $1.6 billion at both March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005. Our internally designated credit
reserves were $14 million at both March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005. For the first quarter of 2006, total
credit losses on these underlying loans were $5 million,
all of which were borne by CES not owned by us. Credit losses
realized during the first quarter of 2005 were $45 million
and were all borne against CES not owned by us.
Securities Portfolio
We continue to acquire diverse residential real estate loan
securities, commercial real estate loan securities, debt
interests in real estate-oriented CDOs, in each case primarily
rated AA, A, and BBB. Also included in this portfolio are
non-investment grade interests in commercial real estate
securities (excluding commercial loan CES), corporate bonds
issued by REITs, and equity in CDOs sponsored by others. We have
sold most of our securities in this consolidated
56
portfolio (as it is reported for GAAP purposes) to Acacia
bankruptcy-remote securitization entities. Acacia issues CDO ABS
to fund its acquisition of these assets. We consolidate
Acacias assets within our securities portfolio or
residential loan CES. We reflect Acacias issuance of CDO
ABS as ABS issued obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The increase in the securities portfolio during the first
quarter of 2006 was the result of additional acquisitions of
securities for sale to Acacia. Our consolidated securities
portfolio totaled $1.8 billion carrying value on
March 31, 2006, of which $1.8 billion had been sold to
Acacia ABS securitization entities as of that date. At
December 31, 2005, we had $1.7 billion carrying value
of these securities, of which $1.6 billion had been sold to
Acacia entities as of that date.
We are continuing to acquire non-investment grade CMBS that are
rated BB and B. We generally sell these assets to Acacia
entities. The balance of these CMBS assets was $160 million
at both March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
The table below presents the types of securities we own as
reported in this securities portfolio by their credit ratings as
of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Table 18 Consolidated Securities
Portfolio Underlying Collateral
Characteristics
(In millions) | Rating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2006 | Total | AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB | B | Unrated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
$ | 318 | $ | 11 | $ | 2 | $ | 19 | $ | 126 | $ | 131 | $ | 29 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Residential Prime real estate
|
756 | 40 | 261 | 210 | 245 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Sub-prime real estate
|
442 | 5 | 86 | 291 | 60 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Second Lien real estate
|
100 | 3 | 47 | 45 | 5 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
REIT Corporate Debt
|
31 | | | | 23 | 8 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate CDOs
|
171 | 44 | 28 | 37 | 47 | 14 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Securities Portfolio
|
$ | 1,818 | $ | 103 | $ | 424 | $ | 602 | $ | 506 | $ | 153 | $ | 29 | $ | 1 |
(In millions) | Rating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2005 | Total | AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB | B | Unrated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
$ | 322 | $ | 11 | $ | 2 | $ | 20 | $ | 129 | $ | 130 | $ | 30 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Residential Prime real estate
|
690 | 29 | 240 | 194 | 227 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Sub-prime real estate
|
442 | 5 | 86 | 292 | 59 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Second Lien real estate
|
108 | | 49 | 54 | 5 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
REIT Corporate Debt
|
32 | | | | 24 | 8 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate CDOs
|
155 | 37 | 25 | 37 | 44 | 11 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Securities Portfolio
|
$ | 1,749 | $ | 82 | $ | 402 | $ | 597 | $ | 488 | $ | 149 | $ | 30 | $ | 1 |
We reported other-than-temporary impairments (EITF 99-20 and FAS 115) in the consolidated securities portfolio of $3.2 million during the first quarter of 2006 and $0.4 million during the first quarter of 2005. |
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
Redwood Debt |
At March 31, 2006, we had no Redwood debt outstanding as a result of unutilized cash balances and reduced securitization activity. | |
We typically use Redwood debt to fund the accumulation of assets prior to sale to sponsored ABS securitization entities (Sequoia and Acacia entities). These accumulated assets are pledged |
57
to secure the associated debt. Additional collateral or cash may
be required to meet changes in market values from time to time
under these agreements. These borrowings have maturities of less
than one year and interest rates that generally change monthly
based upon a margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate. Our
debt levels vary based on the timing of our asset accumulation
and securitization activities and on our levels of investment
capital. During the first quarter of 2006, as measured daily,
our maximum debt level was $229 million, our minimum debt
level was zero, and our average debt level was $137 million.
Redwoods debt is typically secured debt, secured by a
pledge of securities accumulated as inventory for sale to Acacia
securitization entities or by residential real estate loans
accumulated for sale to Sequoia. We also have an unsecured line
of credit available that was not drawn upon as of March 31,
2006. Covenants associated with a portion of our short-term debt
generally relate to our tangible net worth, liquidity reserves,
and leverage requirements. We have not had, nor do we currently
anticipate having, any problems in meeting these covenants.
However, many factors, including ones external to us, may affect
our ability to meet these covenants and may affect our liquidity
in the future.
In 2005, we formed Madrona Residential Funding, LLC
(Madrona), a special purpose entity and wholly owned
subsidiary of RWT Holdings. Madrona gives us the flexibility to
access the capital markets and issue short-term debt instruments
to finance the accumulation of loans prior to sale to sponsored
securitization entities. Madrona is designed to fund residential
loans accumulated for eventual sale to our Sequoia
securitization program by issuing A1+/P1 rated commercial paper.
Madrona was established to accumulate up to $1.5 billion of
loans (with a current authorization for $300 million) and
can warehouse each loan up to 270 days. There are specific
eligibility requirements for financing loans in this facility
that are similar to our existing financing facilities with
several banks and large investment banking firms. There is a
credit reserve account for approximately 70 basis points
that will serve as credit-enhancement to the commercial paper
investors. In addition, we issued $5.4 million of a
BBB-rated Madrona ABS to provide further credit support to the
holders of commercial paper. This facility has a three-year
term. As of March 31, 2006, there was no commercial paper
issuance outstanding.
Asset-Backed Securities Issued
Redwood consolidates on its balance sheets the ABS that are
obligations of those securitization entities that are sponsored
by Redwood. These ABS issued are not obligations of Redwood.
Sequoia had $11.5 billion ABS outstanding on March 31,
2006 compared to $13.4 billion on December 31, 2005.
Pay downs of existing ABS issued by Sequoia exceeded new
issuance.
Acacia entities issued ABS of a type known as CDOs to fund their
acquisitions of real estate securities from Redwood. Acacia CDO
issuance outstanding was $2.4 billion on March 31,
2006 and $2.2 billion on December 31, 2005. We issued
$0.3 billion of Acacia ABS in both the first quarter of
2006 and 2005. For the first quarter of 2006, there were
$26 million of Acacia ABS pay downs.
Stockholders Equity
Our reported stockholders equity increased by 3% during
the first quarter of 2006, from $935 million at
December 31, 2005 to $967 million at March 31,
2006 as a result of $28 million earnings, $18 million
dividends declared, $8 million stock issuance,
$1 million proceeds from stock option exercises,
$5 million non-cash equity adjustments related to grant and
amortization of equity awards, and a $8 million net
increase in unrealized gains of assets and interest rate
agreements that are
marked-to-market
through our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We may seek to issue additional shares even during a period when
we are maintaining uninvested cash balances. This would allow us
to accommodate additional portfolio growth while also using cash
balances to reduce overall risk (and insure funding for future
opportunities). We issue equity only when we believe such
issuance would enhance long-term earnings and dividends per
share, compared to what they would have been otherwise.
58
Certain assets are
marked-to-market
through accumulated other comprehensive income; these
adjustments affect our book value but not our net income. As of
March 31, 2006, we reported a net accumulated other
comprehensive income of $82 million and at
December 31, 2005 we reported net accumulated other
comprehensive income of $74 million. Changes in this
account reflect changes in the fair value of our earning assets
(a decrease of $8 million) and interest rate agreements (an
increase of $14 million), and also reflect changes due to
calls, sales, and other-than-temporary impairments of a portion
of our securities (an increase of $2 million). Our reported
book value at March 31, 2006 was approximately $38 per
share.
Cash Requirements, Sources of Cash, and Liquidity
We use cash to fund our operating and securitization activities,
invest in earning assets, service and repay Redwood debt, fund
working capital, and fund our dividend distributions.
One primary source of cash is principal and interest payments
received on a monthly basis from real estate loans and
securities. This includes payments received from ABS that we
acquired as investment assets from ABS securitizations we
sponsor. Other sources of cash include proceeds from sales of
assets to securitizations entities, proceeds from sales of other
assets, borrowings, and issuance of common stock.
We currently use borrowings solely to finance the accumulation
of assets for future sale to securitization entities. Sources of
borrowings include repurchase agreements, bank borrowings,
collateralized short-term borrowings, and non-secured lines of
credit. We may also issue commercial paper. Our borrowings are
typically repaid using proceeds received from the sale of assets
to securitization entities. For residential loans, our typical
inventory holding period is one to twelve weeks. For securities
held for sale to Acacia CDO securitization entities, our typical
holding period is one to six months.
Our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows include cash flows
generated and used by the ABS securitization entities that are
consolidated on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash flows
generated within these entities are not available to Redwood,
except to the degree that a portion of these cash flows may be
due to Redwood as an owner of one or more of the ABS issued by
the entity. Cash flow obligations of and uses of cash by these
ABS entities are not part of Redwoods operations and are
not obligations of Redwood, although a decrease in net cash flow
(or an increase in credit losses) generated by an ABS entity
could defer or reduce (or potentially eliminate) interest and/or
principal payments otherwise due to Redwood as an owner of
certain more risky ABS issued by the entities.
At March 31, 2006, we had $1.0 billion of capital and
no Redwood debt. This capital is available to invest in assets
and to support our business. At March 31, 2006,
$163 million of this capital was cash and working capital
necessary to support our residential conduit and
credit-enhancement operations, $47 million was invested in
interest rate agreements, $174 million was cash available
to acquire new assets (excess capital) and $583 million was
invested in assets we believe will generate long-term cash flows
at attractive rates of return.
We believe that a weakening of the housing market, if it
continues, will likely bring excellent asset acquisition
opportunities over the next few years. In order to take
advantage of future opportunities, our goal is to maintain cash
balances that are available to make new investments. Our current
plan, which is subject to change, is to invest our excess cash
steadily during 2006 and 2007.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
At March 31, 2006, in the ordinary course of business, we
had commitments to purchase $6 million of real estate loans
that settled in the second quarter of 2006. These purchase
commitments represent derivative instruments under
FAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The value of
these
59
commitments was negligible as of March 31, 2006. We also
had commitments to purchase $5 million of securities as of
March 31, 2006.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The table below presents our contractual obligations and
commitments as of March 31, 2006, as well as the
consolidated obligations of the securitization entities that we
sponsored and are consolidated on our balance sheets. The
operating leases are commitments that are expensed based on the
terms of the related contracts.
Table 19 Contractual Obligations and Commitments as of
March 31, 2006
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Payments Due or Commitment Expiration by Period | ||||||||||||||||
Less Than | 1 to | |||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | 5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||
Redwood obligations:
|
||||||||||||||||
Redwood debt
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Operating leases
|
5,479 | 896 | 2,825 | 1,758 | ||||||||||||
Purchase commitments
securities
|
5,000 | 5,000 | | | ||||||||||||
Purchase commitments
whole loans
|
5,848 | 5,848 | | | ||||||||||||
Total Redwood obligations and
commitments
|
$ | 16,327 | $ | 11,744 | $ | 2,825 | $ | 1,758 | ||||||||
Obligations of securitization
entities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated asset-backed securities
|
$ | 13,929,907 | $ | | $ | | $ | 13,929,907 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
43,402 | 43,402 | | | ||||||||||||
Total obligations of securitization
entities
|
$ | 13,973,309 | $ | 43,402 | $ | | $ | 13,929,907 | ||||||||
Total consolidated obligations and
commitments
|
$ | 13,989,636 | $ | 55,146 | $ | 2,825 | $ | 13,931,665 | ||||||||
Note: All consolidated ABS issued are collateralized by associated assets and, although the stated maturity is as shown, the ABS obligations will pay down as the principal of the associated real estate loans or securities pay down. |
MARKET RISKS |
We seek to manage the risks inherent in our business including but not limited to credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and market value risk in a prudent manner designed to insure Redwoods longevity. At the same time, we endeavor, to the best of our ability, to provide our stockholders with both a steady regular dividend and an attractive long-term return. In general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from historical experience, to actively manage such risks, to earn sufficient compensation to justify the taking of such risks, and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we do take. |
Credit Risk |
Our core business is assuming the credit risk of real estate loans. | |
We assume credit risk with respect to residential and commercial real estate loans primarily through the ownership of residential and commercial loan CES and similarly structured securities acquired from securitizations sponsored by others and from Sequoia securitizations sponsored by us. These securities have below investment-grade credit ratings due to their high degree of credit risk with respect to the residential real estate loans within the securitization entities that issued these securities. Credit losses from any of the loans in the securitized loan pools reduce the principal value of and economic returns from residential loan CES. We assume credit risk with respect to commercial real estate loans through the ownership of commercial loan CES acquired from securitizations sponsored by others. | |
We are highly leveraged in an economic sense due to the structured leverage within the securities we own, as the amount of residential and commercial real estate loans on which we |
60
take first-loss risk is high relative to our equity
capital base. However, we do not use debt to fund these assets
and our maximum credit loss from these assets (excluding loans
and securities held temporarily as inventory for securitization)
is limited and is less than our equity capital base. The
majority of our credit risk comes from high-quality residential
real estate loans. This includes residential real estate loans
consolidated from ABS securitizations from which we have
acquired a credit-sensitive ABS security, and loans we
effectively guarantee or insure through
the acquisitions of residential loan CES from securitizations
sponsored by others. We are also exposed to credit risks in our
commercial real estate loan portfolio, the
first-loss commercial real estate securities we own,
and in our other residential and commercial real estate
securities, and in counter-parties with whom we do business.
Credit losses on residential real estate loans can occur for
many reasons, including: poor origination practices; fraud;
faulty appraisals; documentation errors; poor underwriting;
legal errors; poor servicing practices; weak economic
conditions; decline in the value of homes; special hazards;
earthquakes and other natural events; over-leveraging of the
borrower; changes in legal protections for lenders; reduction in
personal incomes; job loss; and personal events such as divorce
or health problems. In addition, if the U.S. economy or the
housing market weakens, our credit losses could be increased
beyond levels that we have anticipated. The interest rate is
adjustable for most of the loans securitized by securitization
trusts sponsored by us and for a portion of the loans underlying
residential loan CES we have acquired from securitizations
sponsored by others. Accordingly, when short-term interest rates
rise, required monthly payments from homeowners will rise under
the terms of these ARMs, and this may increase borrowers
delinquencies and defaults. In addition, a portion of the loans
we credit-enhance are IO and negative amortization loans, which
may have special credit risks.
We occasionally acquire residential loan CES backed by negative
amortization adjustable-rate loans made to high-quality
residential borrowers. Even though most of these loans are made
to high-quality borrowers who make substantial down payments and
do not need a negative amortization feature in order to afford
their home, we still expect significantly higher delinquencies
and losses from these loans compared to regular amortization
loans. We believe we have a good chance of generating attractive
risk-adjusted returns on these investments as a result of the
way the securitizations of these riskier loan types are
structured and because of attractive acquisition pricing of
these residential loan CES. Although seemingly attractive, there
is substantial uncertainty about the future performance of these
assets. Nonetheless, we will limit our overall investment in
residential loan CES with these underlying loans.
Credit losses on commercial real estate loans can occur for many
reasons, including: poor origination practices; fraud; faulty
appraisals; documentation errors; poor underwriting; legal
errors; poor servicing practices; weak economic conditions;
decline in the value of the property; special hazards;
earthquakes and other natural events; over-leveraging of the
property; changes in legal protections for lenders; reduction in
market rents and occupancies and poor property management
practices. In addition, if the U.S. economy weakens, our
credit losses could be increased beyond levels that we have
anticipated. The large majority of the commercial loans we
credit-enhance are fixed-rate loans with required amortization.
A small number of loans are IO loans for the entire term or a
portion thereof, which may have special credit risks.
In addition to residential and commercial loan CES, the Acacia
entities we sponsor own investment-grade and other securities
(typically rated AAA through B, and in a second-loss position or
better, or otherwise effectively more senior in the credit
structure as compared to a residential loan CES or commercial
loan CES or equivalent held by us) issued by residential
securitization entities that are sponsored by others. Generally,
we do not control or influence the underwriting, servicing,
management, or loss mitigation efforts with respect to these
assets. Some of the securities Acacia owns are backed by
sub-prime residential loans that have substantially higher risk
characteristics than prime-quality loans. These lower-quality
residential loans can be expected to have higher rates of
delinquency and loss, and losses to Acacia (and thus to
Redwoods interest in these loans) could occur. Most of
Acacias securities are reported as part of our
consolidated securities portfolio on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Acacia has also acquired investment-grade BB-rated, and
B-rated residential loan securities from the Sequoia
securitization entities we have sponsored. The probability of
incurring a credit loss on
61
these securities is less than the probability of loss from
first-loss residential loan CES and commercial loan CES, as
cumulative credit losses within a pool of securitized loans
would have to exceed the principal value of the subordinated CES
(and exhaust any other credit protections) before losses would
be allocated to the Acacia securities. If the pools of
residential and commercial loans underlying these securities
were to experience poor credit results, however, these Acacia
securities could have their credit ratings down-graded, could
suffer losses in market value, or could experience principal
losses. If any of these events occur, it would likely reduce our
returns from the Acacia CDO equity securities we have acquired
and may reduce our ability to sponsor Acacia transactions in the
future.
Our strategy is to maintain an asset/liability posture on a
consolidated basis that is effectively match-funded so that the
achievement of our long-term goals is unlikely to be affected by
changes in interest rates. This includes assets owned and the
ABS issued by consolidated securitization entities, to the
extent that any mismatches within the entities could affect our
cash flows. We use interest rate agreements so that the interest
rate characteristics of the ABS issued by consolidated
securitization entities, as adjusted for outstanding interest
rate agreements, closely matches the interest rate
characteristics of the assets owned by those entities. Overall,
we believe we maintain a close match between the interest rate
characteristics of Redwood debt and the pledged assets. For most
of our debt-funded assets (assets acquired for future sale to
sponsored securitization entities or to other financial
institutions as whole loans), the floating rate nature of our
debt closely matches the adjustable-rate interest income earning
characteristics of the accumulated assets. Not all of the
accumulated assets we acquire are adjustable-rate. We also
acquire fixed rate and hybrid rate securities for
re-securitization through our Acacia CDO program, and we may
acquire hybrid rate residential real estate loans in the future
for our Sequoia securitization program. We typically use
interest rate agreements to hedge associated interest rate
mismatches when the assets we accumulate for future
securitizations do not match the interest rate characteristics
of our debt.
At March 31, 2006, we consolidated $13.1 billion
adjustable-rate ABS collateralized by adjustable-rate assets and
$0.8 billion fixed/hybrid rate ABS collateralized by
consolidated fixed/hybrid rate assets. We own the IO security,
CDO equity, or similar security that economically benefits from
the spread between the assets and the liabilities of the issuing
securitization entity on a portion ($10.5 billion) of these
consolidated entities. These assets and liabilities are closely
matched economically and to the degree there is a mismatch we
attempt to reduce this mismatch through the use of interest rate
agreements. For the remainder of the consolidated ABS entities
($3.4 billion), we do not own the security that benefits
from the asset/liability spread. Thus, spread changes between
the yield of these assets and the cost of these liabilities do
not affect our economic profits or cash flow. We do not utilize
interest rate agreements with respect to interest rate
mismatches that may exist between these assets and liabilities
on these other consolidated ABS entities.
The remainder of our consolidated assets at March 31, 2006
($290 million six-month adjustable-rate assets,
$5 million short-term fixed rate assets, $434 million
hybrid and fixed-rate assets, and $237 million non-earning
assets) were funded, for interest rate matching purposes,
effectively with equity.
We seek to maintain an asset/liability posture that benefits
from investments in prepayment-sensitive assets while limiting
the risk of adverse prepayment fluctuations to an amount that,
in most circumstances, can be absorbed by our capital base while
still allowing us to make regular dividend payments.
Prepayments affect GAAP earnings in the near term primarily
through the timing of the amortization of purchase premium and
discount. Amortization income from discount assets may not
necessarily offset amortization expense from premium assets, and
vice-versa. Variations in
62
current and projected prepayment rates for individual assets and
changes in short-term interest rates (as they affect projected
coupons on ARMs and thus change effective yield calculations on
certain loans) may cause net premium amortization expense or net
discount amortization income to vary substantially from quarter
to quarter. In addition, the timing of premium amortization on
assets may not always match the timing of the premium
amortization taken to income on liabilities even when the
underlying assets are the same (i.e., the prepayments are
identical).
We believe there is a relatively low likelihood of prepayment
risk events occurring within our securitization inventory
assets, as we typically sell these loans within a few months of
acquiring them. However, changes in prepayment forecasts by
market participants could affect the market prices for ABS
(especially IO securities) sold by these securitization
entities, and thus could affect the gain on sale for economic
and tax purposes (not for GAAP purposes since these are
accounted for as financings) that we seek to earn from
sponsoring these securitizations.
There are prepayment risks in the assets and associated
liabilities consolidated on our balance sheets. In general,
discount securities (such as CES) benefit from faster prepayment
rates on the underlying real estate loans and premium securities
(such as IO securities) benefit from slower prepayments on the
underlying loans. Our largest current potential exposure to
increases in prepayment rates is from short-term residential ARM
loans. However, our premium balances on IO securities backed by
ARM loans are currently significantly less than our discount
balances on residential loan CES backed by ARM loans. As a
result, we believe that we are currently biased in favor of
faster prepayment speeds with respect to the long term economic
effect of ARM prepayments. However, in the short term, changes
in ARM prepayment rates could cause GAAP earnings volatility.
ARM prepayment rates are driven by many factors, one of which is
the steepness of the yield curve. As the yield curve flattens
(short-term interest rates rise relative to longer-term interest
rates), ARM prepayments typically increase.
Prepayment rates on the ARMs underlying the Redwood-sponsored
Sequoia securitizations increased from near 25% to nearly 50%
over the last year as the yield curve flattened.
Through our ownership of discount residential loan CES backed by
fixed rate and hybrid residential loans, we generally benefit
from faster prepayments on fixed and hybrid loans. Prepayment
rates for these loans typically accelerate as medium-and
long-term interest rates decline.
Prepayments can also affect our credit results and risks. Credit
risks for the CES we own are reduced each time a loan prepays.
All other factors being equal, faster prepayment rates should
reduce our credit risks on our existing portfolio.
At March 31, 2006, we reported on a consolidated basis
$2.5 billion of assets that were
marked-to-market
through our balance sheet (i.e., available for sale securities)
but not through our income statement. Of these assets, 58% have
adjustable-rate coupons, 19% have hybrid coupon rates, and the
remaining 23% have fixed coupon rates. Many of these assets are
credit-sensitive. Market value fluctuations of these assets can
affect the balance of our stockholders equity base. Market
value fluctuations for our securities can affect not only our
earnings and book value, but also our liquidity, especially to
the extent these assets may be funded with short-term debt prior
to securitization.
Most of our consolidated real estate assets are loans accounted
for as held-for-investment and reported at cost. Although these
loans have generally been sold to Sequoia entities at
securitization and, thus, changes in the market value of the
loans do not have an impact on our liquidity in the long term
and changes in market value during the accumulation period
(while these loans are funded with debt) may have a short-term
effect on our liquidity.
63
We use interest rate agreements to manage certain interest rate
risks. Our interest rate agreements are reported at market
value, with any periodic changes reported through either our
income statement or in our balance sheet. Adverse changes in the
market values of our interest rate agreements (which would
generally be caused by falling interest rates) may require us to
devote additional amounts of cash to margin calls.
Virtually all of our consolidated assets and liabilities are
financial in nature. As a result, changes in interest rates and
other factors drive our performance far more than does
inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily
correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP
and, as a REIT, our dividends must equal at least 90% of our
REIT taxable income as calculated for tax purposes. In each
case, our activities and balance sheet are measured with
reference to historical cost or fair market value without
considering inflation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date
of the consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
critical accounting policies and the possible effect of changes
in estimates on our financial results and statements are
discussed below. Management discusses the ongoing development
and selection of these critical accounting policies with the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
We have recently become aware of a potential technical
interpretation of GAAP that differs from our current accounting
presentations. We have not changed our accounting treatment for
this potential issue. However, if we were to change our current
accounting presentations based on this interpretation, we do not
believe there would be a material impact on our net income or
balance sheets. This issue relates to the accounting for
transactions where assets are purchased from a counterparty and
simultaneously financed through a repurchase agreement with that
same counterparty and whether these transactions create
derivatives instead of the acquisition of assets with related
financing (which is how we currently present these
transactions). This potential technical interpretation of GAAP
does not affect the economics of the transactions but may affect
how the transactions would be reported in our financial
statements. Our cash flows, our liquidity, and our ability to
pay a dividend would be unchanged, and we do not believe our
taxable income would be affected.
When recognizing revenue on consolidated earning assets, we
employ the interest method and determine an effective yield to
account for purchase premiums, discounts, and other net
capitalized fees or costs associated with purchasing and
financing real estate loans and securities. For consolidated
real estate loans, the interest method is applied as prescribed
under FAS 91. For loans acquired prior to July 1,
2004, the interest method or effective yield is determined using
interest rates as they change over time and future anticipated
principal prepayments. For loans acquired subsequent to that
date, the initial interest rate of the loans and future
anticipated principal prepayments are used in determining the
effective yield. For our consolidated securities, the interest
method to determine an effective yield is applied as prescribed
under FAS 91 or
EITF 99-20 using
anticipated principal prepayments. The use of these methods
requires us to project cash flows over the remaining life of
each asset. These projections include assumptions about interest
rates, prepayment rates, timing and amount of credit losses,
when certain tests will be met that may allow for changes in
payments made under the structure of securities, estimates
regarding the likelihood and timing of calls of securities at
par, and other factors. We review our cash flow projections on
an ongoing basis and monitor these projections based on input
and analyses received from external sources, internal models,
64
and our own judgment and experience. We constantly review our
assumptions and make adjustments to the cash flows as deemed
necessary. There can be no assurance that our assumptions used
to generate future cash flows, or the current periods
yield for each asset, will prove to be accurate.
Under the interest method, decreases in our credit loss
assumptions embedded in our cash flow forecasts could result in
increasing yields being recognized from residential loan CES. In
addition, faster-than-anticipated prepayment rates would also
tend to increase realized yields over the remaining life of an
asset. In contrast, increases in our credit loss assumptions
and/or slower than anticipated prepayment rates could result in
lower yields being recognized under the interest method and may
represent an other-than-temporary impairment under GAAP, in
which case the asset may be written down to its fair value
through our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Redwood applies APB 21 and APB 12 in determining its
periodic amortization for the premium on its debt, including the
issuance of IO securities and deferred bond issuance
cost (DBIC). We arrive at a periodic interest cost that
represents a level effective rate on the sum of the face amount
of the ABS issued and (plus or minus) the unamortized premium or
discount at the beginning of each period. The difference between
the periodic interest cost so calculated and the nominal
interest on the outstanding amount of the ABS issued is the
amount of periodic amortization. Prepayment assumptions used in
modeling the underlying assets to determine accretion or
amortization of discount or premium are used in developing the
liability cash flows that are used to determine ABS issued
premium amortization and DBIC expenses.
Valuation adjustments to real estate loans held-for-sale are
reported as net recognized losses and valuation adjustments on
our Consolidated Statements of Income in the applicable period
of the adjustment. Adjustments to the fair value of securities
available-for-sale are reported through our Consolidated Balance
Sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
in stockholders equity within the cumulative unrealized
gains and losses classified as accumulated other comprehensive
income. The exception to this treatment of securities
available-for-sale is when a specific impairment is identified
or a decrease in fair value results from a decline in estimated
cash flows that is considered other-than-temporary. In such
cases, the resulting decrease in fair value is recorded in net
recognized gains (losses) and valuation adjustments on our
Consolidated Statements of Income in the applicable period of
the adjustment.
We estimate fair value of assets and interest rate agreements
using available market information and other appropriate
valuation methodologies. We believe estimates we use reflect
market values we may be able to receive should we choose to sell
assets. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and
involve matters of uncertainty and judgment in interpreting
relevant market and other data. Many factors are necessary to
estimate market values, including, but not limited to, interest
rates, prepayment rates, amount and timing of credit losses,
supply and demand, liquidity, and other market factors. We apply
these factors to each of our assets, as appropriate, in order to
determine market values. Residential real estate loans
held-for-sale are generally valued on a pool basis while
commercial real estate loans held-for-sale and securities
available-for-sale are valued on an asset-specific basis.
We review our fair value calculations on an ongoing basis. We
monitor the critical performance factors for each loan and
security. Our expectations of future performance are shaped by
input and analyses received from external sources, internal
models, and our own judgment and experience. We review our
existing assumptions relative to our and the markets
expectations of future events and make adjustments to the
assumptions that may change our market values. Changes in
perceptions regarding future events can have a material impact
on the value of our assets. Should such changes or other factors
result in significant changes in the market values, our net
income and book value could be adversely affected.
65
In addition to our valuation processes, we are active acquirers
and occasional sellers of assets. Thus, we believe that we have
the ability to understand and determine changes in assumptions
that are taking place in the marketplace and make appropriate
changes in our assumptions for valuing assets. In addition, we
use third party sources to validate our valuation estimates.
There are certain other valuation estimates we make that have an
impact on current period income and expense. One such area is
the valuation of certain equity grants. Under FAS 123R, we
estimate the value of options, which is based on a number of
assumptions. Currently, most of our equity awards are restricted
stock and deferred stock units and the fair values at grant
equal the market value of Redwood stock so there are no
assumptions required to determine fair value. However,
FAS 123R does require us to estimate for forfeitures and
other factors that may affect the actual expense recognized in
any one period.
For consolidated residential and commercial real estate loans
held-for-investment, we establish and maintain credit reserves
that we believe represent probable credit losses that will
result from inherent losses existing in our consolidated
residential and commercial real estate loans held-for-investment
as of the date of the financial statements. The reserves for
credit losses are adjusted by taking provisions for credit
losses recorded as a reduction in interest income on residential
and commercial real estate loans on our Consolidated Statements
of Income. The reserves consist of estimates of specific loan
impairment and estimates of collective losses on pools of loans
with similar characteristics.
To calculate the credit reserve for credit losses for
residential real estate loans and home equity lines of credit
(HELOCs), we determine inherent losses by applying loss factors
(default, the timing of defaults, and the loss severity upon
default) that can be specifically applied to each pool of loans.
The following factors are considered and applied in such
determination:
On-going analysis of the pool of loans, including, but not
limited to, the age of the loans, underwriting standards,
business climate, economic conditions, geographic
considerations, and other observable data;
Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans;
Relevant environmental factors;
Relevant market research and publicly available third-party
reference loss rates;
Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs;
Effects and changes in credit concentrations; and,
Prepayment assumptions.
Once we determine the applicable default rate, the timing of
defaults, and the severity of loss upon the default, we estimate
the expected losses of each pool of loans over their expected
lives. We then estimate the timing of these losses and the
losses probable to occur over an effective loss confirmation
period. This period is defined as the range of time between the
probable occurrence of a credit loss (such as the initial
deterioration of the borrowers financial condition) and
the confirmation of that loss (the actual charge-off of the
loan). The losses expected to occur within the effective loss
confirmation period are the basis of our credit reserves because
we believe those losses exist as of the reported date of the
financial statements. We re-evaluate the level of our credit
reserves on at least a quarterly basis and record provision,
charge-offs, and recoveries monthly.
The credit reserve for credit losses for the commercial real
estate loans includes a detailed analysis of each loan and
underlying property. The following factors are considered and
applied in such determination.
On-going analysis of each individual loan, including, but not
limited to, the age of the loans, underwriting standards,
business climate, economic conditions, geographic
considerations, and other observable data;
On-going evaluation of fair values of collateral using current
appraisals and other valuations;
Discounted cash flow analysis; and,
Borrowers ability to meet obligations.
66
If a residential loan becomes REO or a commercial loan becomes
impaired, or loans are reclassified as held-for-sale, specific
valuations are primarily based on analyses of the underlying
collateral.
Residential and commercial loan CES are the securities issued by
an ABS securitization entity that bear most of the initial
credit risk of the underlying pool of loans that was
securitized. As a result of the relatively high credit risks of
these investments, we are able to purchase residential and
commercial loan CES at a discount to principal (par) value.
A portion of the purchase discount is subsequently accreted as
interest income under the interest method while the remaining
portion of the purchase discount is considered as a form of
credit protection. The amount of credit protection is based upon
our assessment of various factors affecting our assets,
including economic conditions, characteristics of the underlying
loans, delinquency status, past performance of similar loans,
and external credit protection. We use a variety of internal and
external credit risk analyses, cash flow modeling, and portfolio
analytical tools to assist us in our assessments. If cumulative
credit losses in the underlying pool of loans exceed the
principal value of the first-loss piece, we may never receive a
principal payment from that security. The maximum loss for the
owner of these securities, however, is limited to the investment
made in purchasing the CES. In addition to the amount of losses,
the timing of future credit losses is also important. In
general, the longer credit losses are delayed, the better our
economic returns, as we continue to earn coupon interest on the
face value of our security.
We use derivative instruments to manage certain risks such as
market value risk and interest rate risk. Currently, the
majority of our interest rate agreements are used to match the
duration of liabilities to assets. The derivative instruments we
employ include, but are not limited to, interest rate swaps,
interest rate options, options on swaps, futures contracts,
options on futures contracts, options on forward purchases, and
other similar derivatives. We collectively refer to these
derivative instruments as interest rate agreements.
On the date an interest rate agreement is entered into, we
designate each interest rate agreement under GAAP as (1) a
hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of
an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a
hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash
flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge), or (3) held for trading
(trading instrument).
We currently elect to account for most of our interest rate
agreements as cash flow hedges; the remainder are accounted for
as trading instruments. We record these derivatives at their
estimated fair market values, and record changes in their fair
values in accumulated other comprehensive income on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts are reclassified to
our Consolidated Statements of Income over the effective hedge
period as the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffective
portions of these cash flow hedges are included in our
Consolidated Statements of Income, and any changes in the market
value on our hedges designated as trading instruments.
We may discontinue GAAP hedge accounting prospectively when we
determine that (1) the derivative is no longer effective in
offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged
item; (2) it is no longer probable that the forecasted
transaction will occur; (3) a hedged firm commitment no
longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or
(4) designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is
no longer appropriate. A discontinued hedge may result in
recognition of certain gains or losses immediately through our
Consolidated Statements of Income, or such gains or losses may
be accreted from accumulated other comprehensive income into
earnings over the original hedging period.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Discussions about our quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risk are included in our Managements
Discussion and Analysis included herein.
67
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as that term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on
that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that as of March 31, 2006,
which is the end of the period covered by this
10-Q, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
There has been no change in Redwoods internal control over
financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15 that
occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Redwoods internal control over financial reporting.
68
Item 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
Total | Shares Purchased as | of Shares Available | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Part of Publicly | For Purchase Under | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced | Publicly Announced | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Per Share | Programs | Programs | ||||||||||||
January 1 - January 31,
2006
|
304 | $ | 41.26 | | | |||||||||||
February 1 - February 28,
2006
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
March 1 - March 31, 2006
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total
|
304 | $ | 41.26 | | 1,000,000 |
The 304 shares purchased for the three months ended March 31, 2006 represent shares required to satisfy tax withholding requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. The Company announced stock repurchase plans on various dates from September 1997 through November 1999 for the total repurchase of 7,455,000 shares. None of these plans have expiration dates on repurchases. Shares totaling 1,000,000 are currently available for repurchase under those plans. |
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). | |
Exhibit 32.2
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
69
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. | ||
Dated: May 3, 2006 | By: /s/ Douglas B. Hansen | |
Douglas B. Hansen | ||
President (authorized officer of registrant) |
||
Dated: May 3, 2006 | By: /s/ Harold F. Zagunis | |
Harold F. Zagunis | ||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, Treasurer, and Secretary (principal financial and accounting officer) |
70