e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
February 25,
2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
Commission File Number
1-13873
STEELCASE INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
(State of incorporation)
|
|
38-0819050
(IRS employer identification
number)
|
901 44th Street SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
49508
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(616) 247-2710
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
reporting
company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates, computed by
reference to the closing price of the Class A Common Stock
on the New York Stock Exchange, as of August 27, 2010 (the
last day of the registrants most recently completed second
fiscal quarter) was approximately $503 million. There is no
quoted market for registrants Class B Common Stock,
but shares of Class B Common Stock may be converted at any
time into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock.
As of April 22, 2011, 87,435,440 shares of the
registrants Class A Common Stock and
44,199,378 shares of the registrants Class B
Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held on
July 13, 2011, are incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K.
STEELCASE INC.
FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 25, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Item. Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Schedule II
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
Index of Exhibits
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
PART I
The following business overview is qualified in its entirety by
the more detailed information included elsewhere or incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Report). As used in this Report, unless otherwise
expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, all
references to Steelcase, we,
our, Company and similar references are
to Steelcase Inc. and its subsidiaries in which a controlling
interest is maintained. Unless the context otherwise indicates,
reference to a year relates to the fiscal year, ended in
February of the year indicated, rather than a calendar year.
Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 reference the first, second,
third and fourth quarter, respectively, of the fiscal year
indicated. All amounts are in millions, except share and per
share data, data presented as a percentage or as otherwise
indicated.
Our
Business
Steelcase is the global leader in furnishing the work experience
in office environments. We aspire to create great experiences,
wherever work happens. We provide products and services founded
in a research methodology that generates insights about how
people work and how spaces can help create great experiences. We
offer a comprehensive portfolio of products and services for the
workplace, inspired by insights gained from serving the
worlds leading organizations for nearly 100 years.
We design for a wide variety of customer needs through our three
core brands: Steelcase, Turnstone and Coalesse. The primary
focus of these brands is the office furniture segment, but we
also extend our capabilities to serve needs in areas such as
healthcare, education and distributed work. Our strategy is to
grow by leveraging our deep understanding of the patterns of
work, workers and workplaces to offer solutions to help our
existing customers migrate to new ways of working, and to grow
our business into new customer markets and new geographies.
Insights are core to everything we do. We study the ways people
work, and we collaborate with a global network of research
partners including leading universities, research institutes and
corporations. We seek to understand and recognize emerging
social, spatial and informational patterns and create products
and solutions that solve for the intersection of all three. By
focusing our insights on the overlap of these elements, we can
create products and solutions that enable better social
interactions, enhance collaboration and facilitate greater
information sharing. This approach is the lens through which we
filter opportunities for development.
We create value by translating our insights into products,
solutions and experiences that solve our customers
critical business issues at competitive prices. Our insights are
translated into products, applications and experiences through
thoughtful design, which we define as being smart, desirable and
viable. When we understand something new about the way people
work and address that insight with a product, its smart.
When we create experiences or objects that are considered
refined and highly relevant, they are desirable. And when we do
this with fewer, more understandable elements, its viable.
We incorporate sustainability in our approach to design,
manufacturing, delivery and product life cycle management, and
we consider the impact of our work on the environment. At
Steelcase our approach to sustainability is holistic,
scientific, measureable and long-term in focus.
We offer our products and services to customers around the
globe, and we have significant sales, manufacturing and
administrative operations in North America, Europe and Asia. We
market our products and services primarily through a network of
independent and company-owned dealers, and we also sell directly
to end-use customers. We extend our reach with a presence in
retail and web-based channels.
Founded in 1912, Steelcase became a publicly-traded company in
1998, and our stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol SCS. Headquartered in Grand Rapids,
Michigan,
1
U.S.A., Steelcase is a global company with approximately
10,000 employees and 2011 revenue of $2.4 billion.
Our
Offerings
Our brands provide an integrated portfolio of furniture systems
and seating, user-centered technologies and interior
architectural products across a range of price points. Our
furniture portfolio includes panel-based and freestanding
furniture systems and complementary products such as storage,
tables and ergonomic worktools. Our seating products include
chairs which are highly ergonomic, seating that can be used in
collaborative or casual settings and specialty seating for
specific vertical markets such as healthcare and education. Our
technology solutions support group collaboration by integrating
furniture and technology. Our interior architectural products
include full and partial height walls and doors. We also offer
services designed to reduce costs and enhance the performance of
people, wherever they work. Among these services are workplace
strategy consulting, lease origination services and furniture
and asset management.
SteelcaseInsight-led
performance in an interconnected world
The Steelcase brand takes our insights and delivers high
performance, sustainable work environments while striving to be
a trusted partner. Being a trusted partner means understanding
and helping our customers and partners who truly seek to elevate
their performance. The Steelcase brands core customers are
leading organizations (such as corporations, healthcare
organizations, colleges/universities and government entities)
that are often large with complex needs and who have an
increasingly global reach. We strive to meet their diverse needs
while minimizing complexity by using a platform
approachfrom product components to common
processeswherever possible.
Steelcase
sub-brands
include:
|
|
|
|
|
Nurture by Steelcase, which is focused on healthcare
environments that can help make patients more comfortable,
caregivers more efficient and partners in care more receptive to
healthcare delivery. Nurture brings a holistic viewpoint to
healthcare environments and works with patients and healthcare
professionals to develop valuable insights into environments
that promote healing.
|
|
|
|
Details, which researches, designs and markets worktools
and furniture that provide healthy and productive connections
between people, their technology, their workplaces and their
work.
|
TurnstoneInsight-led
simplicity
Turnstone is focused on making it easy and compelling for
emerging companies to create great working spaces. Today,
emerging companies do not have easy access to solutions that
will help them work more effectively. These smaller companies
are faced with many of the same complex problems as larger
established companiesbut often without the professional
help. Turnstone strives to provide simple solutions for the
complex social, spatial and informational problems of emerging
companies through thoughtful products and solutions, convenient
access and a great experience.
CoalesseInsight-led
inspiration
Coalesse is founded on the belief that the boundaries between
work and life have blurred and seeks to design solutions that
support meaningful experiences and create inspiring spaces for a
growing class of high performance knowledge workers. Coalesse
collaborates with some of the worlds best design talent to
create inspired solutions that challenge generic approaches to
home and office environments. Coalesse also offers products that
knit together the rich design histories of our Brayton, Metro
and Vecta brands. Coalesses clients desire premium
performance and versatility in furnishings that can be applied
in a home workplace as elegantly as a professional office
environment.
Designtex, which is a
sub-brand of
Coalesse, is a design, marketing, sales and distribution
business focused on providing insight-led environment
enhancement. Designtex products are premium surface
2
materials designed to enhance seating, walls, work stations,
floors and ceilings, and can provide privacy, way-finding,
motivation, communications and artistic expression.
PolyVision
PolyVisions main focus is to understand the needs of K-12
teachers and students and to develop tools that bring learning
to life in an effort to provide a better learning experience for
students globally. PolyVision provides a comprehensive offering
of visual communication solutions, including static and
interactive electronic whiteboards.
Reportable
Segments
We operate on a worldwide basis within our North America and
International reportable segments plus an Other
category. Additional information about our reportable segments,
including financial information about geographic areas, is
contained in Item 7: Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.
North America
Segment
Our North America segment serves customers in the United States
(U.S.) and Canada. Our portfolio of integrated
architecture, furniture and technology products is marketed to
corporate, government, healthcare, education and retail
customers through the Steelcase, Turnstone, Details and Nurture
by Steelcase brands.
We serve North America customers mainly through approximately
220 independent and company-owned dealers and we also sell
directly to end-use customers. Our end-use customers are
distributed across a broad range of industries and vertical
markets including healthcare, government, financial services,
higher education and technology, but no industry or vertical
market individually represented more than 15% of the North
America segment revenue in 2011. The healthcare, government and
higher education vertical markets collectively represented
approximately 39% of 2011 North America revenue.
Each of our dealers maintains its own sales force, which is
complemented by our sales representatives who work closely with
our dealers throughout the selling process. The largest
independent dealer in North America accounted for approximately
6% of the segments revenue in 2011, and the five largest
independent dealers collectively accounted for approximately 17%
of the segments revenue. From time to time, we extend
financial support to our dealers. The type of involvement
varies, but it most often takes the form of asset-backed lending
or term notes to facilitate the transition of a dealership to
owners suitable to us. Depending on the situation, accounting
rules may require us to consolidate a dealer for a period of
time when we extend such financing.
In 2011, the North America segment recorded revenue of $1,322.2,
or 54.3% of our consolidated revenue, and as of the end of the
year had approximately 5,600 employees, of which
approximately 3,600 related to manufacturing.
The North America office furniture industry is highly
competitive, with a number of competitors offering similar
categories of products. The industry competes on a combination
of insight, product performance, design, price and relationships
with customers, architects and designers. Our most significant
competitors in the U.S. are Haworth, Inc., Herman Miller,
Inc., HNI Corporation, Kimball International Inc. and Knoll,
Inc. Together with Steelcase, domestic revenue from these
companies represents approximately one-half of the
U.S. office furniture industry.
International
Segment
Our International segment serves customers outside of the
U.S. and Canada primarily under the Steelcase brand, with
an emphasis on freestanding furniture systems, storage and
seating solutions. The international office furniture market is
highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with many local
and regional manufacturers in many different markets. In many
cases, these competitors focus on
3
specific product categories. Our largest presence is in Western
Europe, where we have the leading market share in Germany,
France and Spain. In 2011, approximately 66% of International
revenue was from Western Europe. The remaining revenue was from
other parts of Europe, Latin America, Asia Pacific, the Middle
East and Africa. No individual country in the International
segment represented more than 7% of our consolidated revenue in
2011.
We serve International customers through approximately 440
independent and company-owned dealers. In certain geographic
markets, we sell directly to end-use customers. No single
independent dealer in the International segment accounted for
more than 2% of the segments revenue in 2011. The five
largest independent dealers collectively accounted for
approximately 8% of the segments revenue in 2011.
In 2011, our International segment recorded revenue of $698.9,
or 28.7% of our consolidated revenue, and as of the end of the
year had approximately 3,300 employees, of which
approximately 1,900 related to manufacturing.
Other
Category
The Other category includes the Coalesse Group and PolyVision.
The Coalesse Group is comprised of the Coalesse and Designtex
brands. Coalesse serves the markets of executive office,
conference, lounge, teaming environments and residential
live/work solutions utilizing a commissioned sales force with
revenue primarily generated through our North America dealer
network. Designtex primarily sells products specified by
architects and designers directly to end-use customers through a
direct sales force.
PolyVision designs and manufactures visual communication
products, such as static and interactive electronic whiteboards,
including a family of interactive electronic whiteboards called
ēno. PolyVision also manufactures steel and ceramic
surfaces for sale to third-party fabricators to create static
whiteboards sold in the primary and secondary education markets
in the U.S. and Europe. PolyVisions sales of visual
communication products are primarily through audio-visual
resellers and our North America dealer network.
Prior to December 14, 2010, the Other category also
included the operations of IDEO, an innovation and design firm.
On December 14, 2010, certain members of the management of
IDEO who collectively owned 20% of IDEO purchased an additional
60% equity interest in IDEO pursuant to an agreement entered
into during 2008. We retained a 20% equity interest in IDEO, and
we expect to continue our collaborative relationship. As a
result, we deconsolidated the operations of IDEO in Q4 2011 and
began to record our share of IDEOs earnings as equity in
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In 2011, IDEO accounted for $103.4, or 4% of our consolidated
revenue.
In 2011, the Other category accounted for $416.0, or 17.1% of
our consolidated revenue, and as of the end of the year had
approximately 1,100 employees, of which approximately 600
related to manufacturing.
Corporate
Corporate costs include portions of shared service functions
such as information technology, human resources, finance,
executive, corporate facilities, legal and research.
Approximately 82% of corporate expenses were charged to the
operating segments in 2011 as part of a corporate allocation.
Unallocated corporate expenses are reported as Corporate.
Joint Ventures
and Other Equity Investments
We enter into joint ventures and other equity investments from
time to time to expand or maintain our geographic presence,
support our distribution network or invest in complementary
products and
4
services. As of February 25, 2011, our investment in these
unconsolidated joint ventures and other equity investments
totaled $45.2. Our share of the earnings from joint ventures and
other equity investments is recorded in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Customer and
Dealer Concentrations
Our largest direct-sale customer accounted for 0.4% of our
consolidated revenue in 2011, and our five largest direct-sale
customers collectively accounted for 1.5% of our consolidated
revenue. However, these percentages do not include revenue from
various government agencies. In aggregate, entities purchasing
under our U.S. General Services Administration contract
collectively accounted for approximately 4% of our consolidated
revenue. We do not believe our business is dependent on any
single or small number of end-use customers, the loss of which
would have a material adverse effect on our business.
No single independent dealer accounted for more than 4% of our
consolidated revenue in 2011. The five largest independent
dealers collectively accounted for approximately 10% of our
consolidated revenue. We do not believe our business is
dependent on any single dealer, the loss of which would have a
sustained material adverse effect upon our business.
Working
Capital
Our accounts receivable are from our dealers and direct-sale
customers. Payment terms vary by country and region. The terms
of our North America segment, and certain markets within the
International segment, encourage prompt payment from dealers by
offering an early settlement discount. Other international
markets have, by market convention, longer payment terms. We are
not aware of any special or unusual practices or conditions
related to working capital items, including accounts receivable,
inventory and accounts payable, which are significant to
understanding our business or the industry at large.
Backlog
Our products are generally manufactured and shipped within two
to six weeks following receipt of order; therefore, we do not
view the amount of backlog at any particular time as a
meaningful indicator of longer-term shipments.
Global
Manufacturing and Supply Chain
Manufacturing
and Logistics
We have manufacturing operations throughout North America
(principally in the United States and Mexico), Europe
(principally in France, Germany and Spain) and Asia (principally
in China and Malaysia).
Our manufacturing model is predominately
make-to-order
with lead times typically ranging from two to six weeks. We
manufacture our products using lean manufacturing principles,
which allow us to maintain efficiencies and cost savings by
minimizing the amount of inventory on hand. As a result, we
purchase direct materials and components as needed to meet
demand. We have evolved our manufacturing and supply chain
systems significantly over the past several years by
implementing continuous one-piece flow, platforming our
processes and product offerings and developing a global network
of integrated suppliers. Any operation which cannot be part of
one-piece flow may be evaluated to see whether outside partners
would offer better levels of service, quality and cost. Our
global manufacturing operations are centralized under a single
organization to serve our customers needs across multiple
brands and geographies.
This approach has reduced the capital needs of our business,
inventory levels and the footprint of our manufacturing space,
while at the same time, allowing us to improve quality, delivery
performance and the customer experience. We continue to identify
opportunities to improve the fitness of our business and
strengthen our long-term competitiveness. In 2011, we
substantially completed a project
5
to reorganize our European manufacturing operations, and we
announced the planned closure of three additional manufacturing
facilities in North America. We expect to move production within
these facilities to other Steelcase locations in North America
over the next 18 months.
In addition to our ongoing focus on enhancing the efficiency of
our manufacturing operations, we also seek to reduce costs
through our global sourcing effort. We have capitalized on raw
material and component cost savings available through lower cost
suppliers around the globe. This global view of potential
sources of supply has enhanced our leverage with domestic supply
sources, and we have been able to reduce cycle times through
improvements from all levels throughout the supply chain.
Our physical distribution system utilizes commercial transport,
company-owned and dedicated fleet delivery services. We have
implemented a network of regional distribution centers to reduce
freight costs and improve service to our dealers and customers.
Some of these distribution centers are located within our
manufacturing facilities, and we have engaged third-party
logistics providers to operate most of these regional
distribution centers.
Raw
Materials
We source raw materials and components from a significant number
of suppliers around the world. Those raw materials include
petroleum-based products, steel, other metals, wood,
particleboard and other materials and components. To date, we
have not experienced any significant difficulties in obtaining
these raw materials.
The prices for certain commodities such as steel, aluminum and
other metals, wood, particleboard and petroleum-based products
have fluctuated significantly in recent years due to changes in
global supply and demand. Our global supply chain team
continually evaluates current market conditions, the financial
viability of our suppliers and available supply options on the
basis of cost, quality and reliability of supply.
Research, Design
and Development
Our extensive global researcha combination of user
observations, feedback sessions and sophisticated
analysishas helped us develop social, spatial and
informational insights into work effectiveness. We maintain
collaborative relationships with external world-class
innovators, including leading universities, think tanks and
knowledge leaders, to expand and deepen our understanding of how
people work.
Understanding patterns of work enables us to identify and
anticipate user needs across the globe. Our design teams explore
and develop prototypical solutions to address these needs. These
solutions vary from furniture, architecture and technology
solutions to single products or enhancements to existing
products, and across different vertical market applications such
as healthcare, higher education and professional services.
Organizationally, global design leadership directs strategy and
project work, which is distributed to design studios across our
major businesses and often involves external design services.
Our marketing team evaluates product concepts using several
criteria, including financial return metrics, and chooses which
products will be developed and launched. Designers then work
closely with engineers and suppliers to co-develop products and
processes that incorporate innovative user features with
efficient manufacturing practices. Products are tested for
performance, quality and compliance with applicable standards
and regulations.
Exclusive of royalty payments, we invested $32.0, $33.0 and
$50.0 in research, design and development activities in 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively. We continue to invest approximately
one to two percent of our revenue in research, design and
development each year. Royalties are sometimes paid to external
designers of our products as the products are sold. These costs
are not included in research and development expenses.
6
Intellectual
Property
We generate and hold a significant number of patents in a number
of countries in connection with the operation of our business.
We also hold a number of trademarks that are very important to
our identity and recognition in the marketplace. We do not
believe that any material part of our business is dependent on
the continued availability of any one or all of our patents or
trademarks or that our business would be materially adversely
affected by the loss of any of such, except the
Steelcase, Turnstone,
Coalesse, PolyVision,
Designtex, Details and Nurture by
Steelcase trademarks.
We occasionally enter into license agreements under which we pay
a royalty to third parties for the use of patented products,
designs or process technology. We have established a global
network of intellectual property licenses with our subsidiaries.
Employees
As of February 25, 2011, we had approximately
10,000 employees, including 5,100 hourly employees and
4,900 salaried employees. Additionally, we had approximately 800
temporary workers who primarily work in manufacturing.
Approximately 160 employees in the U.S. are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. Internationally, approximately
900 employees are represented by workers councils
that operate to promote the interests of workers. Management
promotes positive relations with employees based on empowerment
and teamwork.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign
laws and regulations relating to the discharge of materials into
the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the
environment (Environmental Laws). We believe our
operations are in substantial compliance with all Environmental
Laws. We do not believe existing Environmental Laws and
regulations have had or will have any material effects upon our
capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Under certain Environmental Laws, we could be held liable,
without regard to fault, for the costs of remediation associated
with our existing or historical operations. We could also be
held responsible for third-party property and personal injury
claims or for violations of Environmental Laws relating to
contamination. We are a party to, or otherwise involved in,
proceedings relating to several contaminated properties being
investigated and remediated under Environmental Laws, including
as a potentially responsible party in several Superfund site
cleanups. Based on our information regarding the nature and
volume of wastes allegedly disposed of or released at these
properties, the total estimated cleanup costs and other
financially viable potentially responsible parties, we do not
believe the costs to us associated with these properties will be
material, either individually or in the aggregate. We have
established reserves that we believe are adequate to cover our
anticipated remediation costs. However, certain events could
cause our actual costs to vary from the established reserves.
These events include, but are not limited to: a change in
governmental regulations or cleanup standards or requirements;
undiscovered information regarding the nature and volume of
wastes allegedly disposed of or released at these properties;
and other factors increasing the cost of remediation or the loss
of other potentially responsible parties that are financially
capable of contributing toward cleanup costs.
Available
Information
We file annual reports, quarterly reports, proxy statements and
other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). The public may read and copy any
materials we file with the SEC at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information
on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC
at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Also, the SEC maintains an Internet website at www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding issuers, including Steelcase, that
file electronically with the SEC.
7
We also make available free of charge through our internet
website, www.steelcase.com, our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such reports with or
furnish them to the SEC. In addition, our Corporate Governance
Principles, Code of Ethics, Code of Business Conduct and the
charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees are available free of charge
through our website or by writing to Steelcase Inc., Investor
Relations, GH-3C, PO Box 1967, Grand Rapids, Michigan
49501-1967.
We are not including the information contained on our website as
a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Report.
The following risk factors and other information included in
this annual report on
Form 10-K
should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties that we do not know about currently, or that
we currently believe are less significant, may also adversely
affect our business, operating results, cash flows and financial
condition. If any of these risks actually occur, our business,
operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
Our industry
is influenced significantly by cyclical macroeconomic factors
which are difficult to predict.
Our revenue is generated predominantly from the office furniture
industry, and demand for office furniture is influenced heavily
by a variety of macroeconomic factors, such as corporate
profits, non-residential fixed investment, white-collar
employment and commercial office construction and vacancy rates.
During the past 10 years, the U.S. office furniture
industry has gone through two major downturns, with consumption
declining by more than 30% from calendar year 2000 to 2003 and
again from 2007 to 2009, according to the Business and
Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association. During
these downturns, our revenue declined in similar proportion and
our profitability was significantly reduced. We have made a
number of changes to adapt our business model to these cycles,
but our profitability could be impacted in the future by
cyclical downturns. In addition, the pace of industry recovery
after a cyclical downturn may vary, including by geography or
vertical market. These macroeconomic factors are difficult to
predict, and if we are unsuccessful in adapting our business as
economic cyclical changes occur, our results may be adversely
affected.
Failure to
respond to changes in workplace trends and the competitive
landscape may adversely affect our revenue and
profits.
Advances in technology, the globalization of business and shifts
in work styles and behaviors are changing the world of work and
may have a significant impact on the types of workplace products
and services purchased by our customers and the geographic
location of the demand. For example, in recent years, these
trends have resulted in a reduction in the amount of office
floor space allocated per employee, a reduction in size (and
price) of a typical workstation and an increase in work
occurring in a variety of locations beyond the traditional
office. The confluence of these factors could attract new
competitors from outside the traditional office furniture
industry offering products and services which compete with those
offered by us and our dealers. In addition, the traditional
office furniture industry is highly competitive, with a number
of competitors offering similar categories of products. We
compete on a variety of factors, including: brand recognition
and reputation, insight from our research, product design and
features, price, lead time, delivery and service, product
quality, strength of dealers and other distributors and
relationships with customers and key influencers, such as
architects, designers and facility managers. If we are
unsuccessful in developing and offering products which respond
to changes in workplace trends, or we or our dealers are
unsuccessful in competing with existing competitors and new
competitive offerings which could arise from outside our
industry, our revenue and profits may be adversely affected.
8
We may not be
able to successfully develop, implement and manage our
diversification and growth strategies.
Our longer-term success depends on our ability to successfully
develop, implement and manage strategies that will preserve our
position as the worlds largest office furniture
manufacturer, as well as expand our offerings into adjacent and
emerging markets. In particular, our diversification and growth
strategies include:
|
|
|
|
|
translating our research regarding the world of work into
innovative solutions which address market needs,
|
|
|
|
continuing our expansion into adjacent markets such as smaller
companies, healthcare clinical spaces and classrooms,
|
|
|
|
growing our market share in emerging markets such as China,
India and the Middle East,
|
|
|
|
investing in acquisitions and new business ventures and
|
|
|
|
developing new alliances and additional channels of distribution.
|
If these strategies are not sufficient to diversify and expand
our revenue, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
We may be
adversely affected by changes in raw material and commodity
costs.
We procure raw materials (including steel, aluminum, other
metals, wood, particleboard and petroleum-based products) from a
significant number of sources globally. These raw materials are
not rare or unique to our industry. The costs of these
commodities, as well as fuel and energy costs, have fluctuated
significantly in recent years due to changes in global supply
and demand, which can also cause supply interruptions. In the
short-term, rapid increases in raw material and commodity costs
can be very difficult to offset with price increases because of
existing contractual commitments with our customers, and it is
difficult to find effective financial instruments to hedge
against such changes. As a result, our gross margins can be
adversely affected by short-term fluctuations in these costs.
Also, if we are not successful in passing along higher raw
material and commodity costs to our customers over the
longer-term because of competitive pressures, our profitability
could be negatively impacted.
Our global
presence subjects us to risks that may negatively affect our
profitability and financial condition.
We have manufacturing facilities and sales, administrative and
shared services offices in many countries, and as a result, we
are subject to risks associated with doing business globally.
Our success depends on our ability to manage the complexity
associated with designing, developing, manufacturing and selling
our solutions in a variety of countries. Our global presence is
also subject to market risks, which in turn could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition, including:
|
|
|
|
|
differing business practices, cultural factors and regulatory
requirements,
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and currency controls,
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability, natural disasters,
security concerns, including terrorist activity, armed conflict
and civil or military unrest, and global health issues and
|
|
|
|
intellectual property protection challenges.
|
Our continuing
efforts to improve our business model could result in additional
restructuring costs and may result in customer
disruption.
Over the past decade, we have implemented significant
restructuring actions to transform our business through the
reinvention of our industrial system and white collar processes.
While we believe we have made significant progress, we continue
to evolve and optimize our business model to be more
9
flexible and agile in meeting changing demand, and incremental
restructuring actions may be necessary. The success of our
restructuring initiatives is dependent on several factors,
including our ability to manage these actions without disrupting
existing customer commitments. Further, these actions may take
longer than anticipated and may distract management from other
activities, and we may not fully realize the expected benefits
of our restructuring activities, either of which would have a
negative impact on our results of operations.
We are
increasingly reliant on a global network of
suppliers.
Our migration to a less vertically integrated manufacturing
model has increased our dependency on a global network of
suppliers. We are reliant on the timely flow of raw materials,
components and finished goods from third-party suppliers. The
flow of such materials, components and goods may be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the availability and quality of raw materials,
|
|
|
|
the financial solvency of our suppliers and their supply chains,
|
|
|
|
disruptions caused by labor activities and
|
|
|
|
damage and loss of production from accidents, natural disasters
and other causes.
|
Any disruptions in the supply and delivery of raw materials,
component parts and finished goods or deficiencies in our
ability to manage our global network of suppliers could have an
adverse impact on our business, operating results or financial
condition.
Disruptions
within our dealer network could adversely affect our
business.
We rely largely on a network of over 650 independent and
company-owned dealers to market, deliver and install our
products to customers. From time to time, we or a dealer may
choose to terminate our relationship, or the dealer could face
financial insolvency or difficulty in transitioning to new
ownership. Our business is influenced by our ability to initiate
and manage new and existing relationships with dealers, and
establishing new dealers in a market can take considerable time
and resources. Disruption of dealer coverage within a specific
local market could have an adverse impact on our business within
the affected market. The loss or termination of a significant
number of dealers or the inability to establish new dealers
could cause difficulties in marketing and distributing our
products and have an adverse effect on our business, operating
results or financial condition. In the event that a dealer in a
strategic market experiences financial difficulty, we may choose
to make financial investments in the dealership which would
reduce the risk of disruption but increase our financial
exposure.
We may be
required to record impairment charges related to goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets which would adversely affect
our results of operations.
Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets with indefinite
lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment
annually and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change
such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may
exist. Poor performance in portions of our business where we
have goodwill or intangible assets, or declines in the market
value of our equity, may result in impairment charges, which
would adversely affect our profitability.
There may be
significant limitations to our utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards to offset future taxable income.
We have deferred tax asset values related to net operating loss
carryforwards (NOLs) totaling $63.5 which reside
primarily in various
non-U.S. jurisdictions
and reflect a $32.6 valuation allowance. We may be unable to
generate sufficient taxable income from future operations in the
applicable jurisdiction or implement tax, business or other
planning strategies to fully utilize the estimated value of our
NOLs. We have NOLs in various currencies that are also subject
to foreign exchange risk, which could reduce
10
the amount we may ultimately realize. Additionally, future
changes in tax laws or interpretations of such tax laws may
limit our ability to fully utilize our NOLs.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments:
|
None.
We have operations at locations throughout the U.S. and
around the world. None of our owned properties are mortgaged or
are held subject to any significant encumbrance. We believe our
facilities are in good operating condition and, at present, are
in excess of that needed to meet volume needs currently and for
the foreseeable future. Our global headquarters is located in
Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.A. Our owned and leased principal
manufacturing and distribution center locations with greater
than 50,000 square feet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment/Category Primarily Supported
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2011, we closed three owned manufacturing facilities (one
located in Europe, one located in Asia and one located in
the United States) and closed one leased manufacturing facility
located in the United States. In addition, we sold and
subsequently leased back two manufacturing facilities, one in
North America and the other in Asia.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings:
|
We are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary
course of our business. Based on known information, we do not
believe we are a party to any lawsuit or proceeding that is
likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
11
Supplementary
Item. Executive Officers of the Registrant:
Our executive officers are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
Sara E. Armbruster
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Vice President, WorkSpace Futures and Corporate Strategy
|
Mark A. Baker
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Operations Officer
|
James P. Hackett
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
|
Nancy W. Hickey
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
|
James P. Keane
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
President, Steelcase Group
|
Frank H. Merlotti, Jr.
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
President, Coalesse
|
James G. Mitchell
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
President, Steelcase EMEA
|
Mark T. Mossing
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
Lizbeth S. OShaughnessy
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
|
David C. Sylvester
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Sara E. Armbruster has been Vice President, WorkSpace
Futures and Corporate Strategy since May 2009.
Ms. Armbruster was Vice President, Corporate Strategy from
2007 to May 2009. Prior to joining Steelcase in 2007,
Ms. Armbruster was employed by Banta Corporation, a
printing and supply chain management services company based in
Menasha, Wisconsin, where she led Bantas strategy and
business development functions, serving as Vice President,
Business Development from 2006 to 2007 and Director, Business
Development from 2003 to 2006.
Mark A. Baker has been Senior Vice President, Global
Operations since September 2004 and has been employed by
Steelcase since 1995.
James P. Hackett has been President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director since December 1994. Mr. Hackett also
serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Board of Directors of
Fifth Third Bancorp. Mr. Hackett has been employed by
Steelcase since 1981.
Nancy W. Hickey has been Senior Vice President, Chief
Administrative Officer since November 2001 and also served as
Secretary on an interim basis from March to July 2007.
Ms. Hickey has been employed by Steelcase since 1986.
James P. Keane has been President, Steelcase Group since
October 2006. Mr. Keane was Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer from 2001 to October 2006 and has been
employed by Steelcase since 1997.
Frank H. Merlotti, Jr. has been President, Coalesse
since October 2006 (Coalesse was known as the Premium Group from
2007 to 2008 and the Design Group from 2006 to 2007).
Mr. Merlotti has been employed by Steelcase since 2002, and
from 2002 to October 2006, he held the position of President,
Steelcase North America.
James G. Mitchell has been President, Steelcase EMEA
since April 2011 and was President, Steelcase International from
2004 to April 2011. Mr. Mitchell has been employed by
Steelcase since 1993.
Mark T. Mossing has been Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer since April 2008 and served as Vice
President, Corporate Controller from 1999 to April 2008.
Mr. Mossing has been employed by Steelcase since 1993.
Lizbeth S. OShaughnessy has been Senior Vice
President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since April 2011
and was Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary from
2007 to April 2011 and Assistant General Counsel from 2000 to
2007. From 2005 to 2007, Ms. OShaughnessy also held
the position of Assistant Secretary. Ms. OShaughnessy
has been employed by Steelcase since 1992.
David C. Sylvester has been Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer since April 2011 and was Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer from 2006 to April 2011 and Vice President,
Global Operations Finance from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Sylvester
has been employed by Steelcase since 1995.
12
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:
|
Common
Stock
Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SCS. Our Class B
Common Stock is not registered under the Exchange Act or
publicly traded. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information. As of the close of
business on April 22, 2011, we had outstanding
131,634,818 shares of common stock with
8,311 shareholders of record. Of these amounts,
87,435,440 shares are Class A Common Stock with
8,208 shareholders of record and 44,199,378 shares are
Class B Common Stock with 103 shareholders of record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Per Share Price Range
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.59
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.23
|
|
Low
|
|
|
$
|
6.35
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.27
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.54
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.68
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
Low
|
|
|
$
|
3.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.37
|
|
Dividends
The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our
Board of Directors and to compliance with applicable laws.
Dividends in 2011 and 2010 were declared and paid quarterly. The
amount and timing of future dividends depends upon our results
of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future
business prospects, general business conditions and other
factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant at the
time.
Our global committed, syndicated credit facility contains a
restricted payment covenant which establishes a maximum level of
dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments (such as share
repurchases) we may make in a fiscal year. We are permitted to
make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments of up to $25 per year
provided we remain compliant with the financial covenants and
other conditions set forth in the credit agreement. We are
permitted to make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments in excess of $25 in a
fiscal year to the extent that our Liquidity and Leverage Ratio
(as defined in the credit agreement) meet certain thresholds set
forth in the credit agreement. Under this provision, there were
no restrictions on our ability to make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions; however, our availability under
the credit facility would be reduced if dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions exceeded $154 due to financial
covenant constraints as of February 25, 2011. See
Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dividends Paid
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
13
Fourth Quarter
Share Repurchases
The following table is a summary of share repurchase activity
during Q4 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
|
Shares that May
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
11/27/1012/31/10
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
210.8
|
|
1/1/111/28/11
|
|
|
|
646,441
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.88
|
|
|
|
|
645,900
|
|
|
|
|
203.8
|
|
1/29/112/25/11
|
|
|
|
318,555
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
|
277,600
|
|
|
|
|
200.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
966,825
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In December 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program permitting the repurchase of up to $250 of
our common stock. This program has no specific expiration date. |
|
(2) |
|
43,325 of these shares were repurchased to satisfy
participants tax withholding obligations upon the vesting
of restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants, pursuant
to the terms of our Incentive Compensation Plan. |
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
February 29,
|
|
|
|
February 23,
|
|
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008 (1)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,420.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,097.4
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
|
|
|
923.1
|
|
|
|
|
1,098.6
|
|
|
|
|
920.9
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
202.8
|
|
|
|
|
113.7
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
211.4
|
|
|
|
|
124.6
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
133.2
|
|
|
|
|
106.9
|
|
Supplemental Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
$
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(34.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23.7
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
Variable life COLI income (loss) (2)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Dividends paid per common share (3)
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
527.2
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
Working capital (4)
|
|
|
|
275.5
|
|
|
|
|
222.9
|
|
|
|
|
246.1
|
|
|
|
|
267.5
|
|
|
|
|
602.8
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,750.0
|
|
|
|
|
2,124.4
|
|
|
|
|
2,399.4
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
|
300.8
|
|
|
|
|
255.2
|
|
|
|
|
258.7
|
|
|
|
|
255.1
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
|
567.0
|
|
|
|
|
520.7
|
|
|
|
|
556.1
|
|
|
|
|
545.5
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
1,278.1
|
|
|
|
|
979.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,017.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,213.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,161.5
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
|
732.8
|
|
|
|
|
910.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,237.9
|
|
Statement of Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
280.5
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(91.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(51.9
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
(132.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(484.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(127.1
|
)
|
14
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 contained
53 weeks. All other years shown contained 52 weeks. |
|
(2) |
|
Variable life COLI income (loss) represents the net returns in
cash surrender value, normal insurance expenses and any death
benefit gains (COLI income) related to our
investments in variable life company-owned life insurance
(COLI) policies. In Q1 2011, we began considering
our investments in variable life COLI policies to be primarily a
source of corporate liquidity. As a result of this change
beginning in Q1 2011, variable life COLI income has been
recorded in Investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes special cash dividend of $1.75 per share paid in
January 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Working capital equals current assets minus current liabilities,
as presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations:
|
The following review of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included
elsewhere within this Report.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
This item contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. A
non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical
measure of a companys financial performance that excludes
or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP in the consolidated statements of operations, balance
sheets or statements of cash flows of the company. We have
provided a reconciliation below of non-GAAP financial measures
to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
The non-GAAP financial measures used are: (1) organic
revenue growth, which represents the change in revenue over the
prior year excluding estimated currency translation effects and
the impact of dealer deconsolidations and divestitures and the
IDEO ownership transition (see Note 19 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information), and
(2) adjusted operating income (loss), which represents
operating income (loss) excluding restructuring costs, goodwill
and intangible assets impairment charges and income (loss)
associated with changes in the cash surrender value of variable
life company-owned life insurance policies (variable life
COLI income (loss)). These measures are presented because
management uses this information to monitor and evaluate
financial results and trends. Therefore, management believes
this information is also useful for investors.
15
Financial
Summary
Results of
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
1,693.8
|
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,619.9
|
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
|
2,236.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
923.1
|
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
661.2
|
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
648.4
|
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
|
|
|
842.9
|
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Interest expense, Investment income and Other income (expense),
net
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthConsolidated
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations and divestitures
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)
|
IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
2,178.7
|
|
|
|
|
3,130.7
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline)
|
|
|
$
|
258.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(839.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline) %
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
82.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In Q1 2011, we began considering our investments in variable
life COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate
liquidity. As a result of this change beginning in Q1 2011, COLI
income related to our investments in variable life COLI policies
has been recorded in Investment income on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The variable life COLI
income (loss) previously included in operating income is
excluded for comparative purposes. |
Overview
Following a significant reduction in our revenue during 2009 and
2010 in connection with the global economic recession and
downturn in our industry, we began experiencing organic revenue
growth in our business in Q1 2011 as a result of the broader
global economic recovery. This trend strengthened in Q2 2011 as
a result of increased customer project activity and accelerated
in the second half of 2011 when we posted organic revenue growth
over the prior year more broadly across all reporting segments
and in most geographies. This growth is consistent with general
trends in our industry as companies have been increasing
corporate spending.
The organic revenue growth was the primary driver of the
significant increase in adjusted operating income from 2010 to
2011. In addition, our current year results benefited from
previous restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts implemented during the downturn, as well as our efforts
to improve the profitability across various businesses,
including PolyVision, the Coalesse Group and Asia. These
benefits were offset in part by the reinstatement of employee
salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009 levels and
inflation in commodity costs, which increased significantly in
late 2011.
During the downturn in 2009 and 2010, we continued to invest in
our growth initiatives, which we believe will help diversify our
revenue base and grow our revenues at a faster rate than we
would otherwise experience coming out of the downtown. Our
growth initiatives include expanding our offerings and
penetration in certain vertical markets (such as healthcare,
education and government) and emerging geographical markets
(such as China, India and the Middle East), as well as
developing new products, applications and experiences to meet
the evolving business needs of our global customer base.
From 2009 through 2011, in order to reduce our costs and
continue the reinvention of our industrial model, we implemented
a number of restructuring actions which resulted in more than
$100 of annualized fixed cost reductions by the end of 2011. In
addition, we are in the process of closing three additional
plants in North America which is expected to reduce our
annualized costs by an additional $35 once completed over the
next 18 months. We also took a number of steps to improve
our operating fitness and organize our business as a globally
integrated enterprise, including the creation and increased
utilization of captive shared service centers in Malaysia and
Mexico. We expect to be able to preserve these cost reductions
and hold our other fixed costs relatively flat as our industry
continues to recover and our revenue grows.
2011 compared
to 2010
We recorded net income of $20.4 in 2011 compared to a net loss
of $13.6 in 2010. The increase in net income was driven by
operating leverage from organic revenue growth across all of our
reporting segments and benefits from restructuring activities
and other cost reduction efforts, offset in part by lower
variable life COLI income and an income tax charge of $11.4
resulting from the U.S. healthcare reform legislation
enacted in Q1 2011.
Operating income grew to $51.5 in 2011 compared to an operating
loss of $11.5 in 2010. The 2011 adjusted operating income of
$82.1 represented an improvement of $91.8 compared to the prior
year primarily due to operating leverage from organic revenue
growth, benefits from restructuring
17
activities and other cost reduction efforts and a gain from the
IDEO ownership transition totaling $9 (net of incremental
variable compensation expense), partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $12 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009
levels and
|
|
|
|
increased commodity costs of approximately $10.
|
Revenue for 2011 was $2,437.1 compared to $2,291.7 for 2010,
representing organic revenue growth of 12% after adjusting for
dealer deconsolidations, the IDEO ownership transition and
currency translation effects. The organic revenue growth was
broad-based, with organic growth of 12% in the North America
segment, 14% in the International segment and 8% in the Other
category.
Cost of sales decreased to 69.5% of revenue in 2011, a
120 basis point improvement compared to 2010. Higher
absorption of fixed costs associated with organic revenue growth
and benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts were partially offset by the reclassification
of variable life COLI income, which beginning in Q1 2011 is
reported in Investment income, and increased commodity
costs.
Operating expenses increased by $12.8 in 2011 compared to 2010.
The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
higher variable compensation expense of $21 related to our
Economic Value Added (EVA)-based compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
variable life COLI income in the prior year of $13.8,
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $9 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009
levels and
|
|
|
|
increases in other operating costs.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction of $31.0 from deconsolidations,
|
|
|
|
a gain of $13.2 from the IDEO ownership transition,
|
|
|
|
favorable currency translation effects of approximately
$7 and
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts.
|
We recorded restructuring costs of $30.6 in 2011 compared to
$34.9 in 2010. The 2011 charges primarily related to the
reorganization of our European manufacturing operations on the
basis of specialized competencies and several smaller actions to
consolidate manufacturing facilities and reorganize other areas
of our business. In addition, Q4 2011 included a $10.6 gain
related to the sale and leaseback of a facility in Canada offset
by $10.1 of restructuring costs associated with the planned
closure of three additional manufacturing facilities in North
America. See further discussion and detail of these items in the
Segment Disclosure analysis below and in Note 20 to
the consolidated financial statements.
Our 2011 effective tax rate was 60%, significantly higher than
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%. The difference
was primarily driven by a tax charge of $11.4 related to a
reduction in deferred tax assets related to the
U.S. healthcare reform legislation enacted in Q1 2011. See
Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
2010 compared
to 2009
We recorded a net loss of $13.6 in 2010 compared to a net loss
of $11.7 in 2009. The year over year comparison is significantly
impacted by results from variable life COLI, which generated
significant income in 2010 compared to significant losses in
2009. 2009 also included $65.2 of goodwill and intangible asset
impairment charges. Beyond variable life COLI income and prior
year impairment
18
charges, the 2010 deterioration was primarily driven by lower
volume, which was partially offset by benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts, lower
commodity costs and temporary reductions in employee salaries
and retirement benefits.
Operating income decreased by $12.5 in 2010 compared to 2009.
The 2010 adjusted operating loss of $9.7 represented a decline
of $154.9 compared to the prior year due to the reduction in
revenue, partially offset by benefits from restructuring
activities and other cost reduction efforts, lower commodity
costs and temporary reductions in employee salaries and
retirement benefits.
Our revenue decreased $892.0 or 28.0% in 2010 compared to 2009,
representing an organic revenue decline of 27%. The global
economic slowdown and turmoil in the capital markets had the
effect of significantly decreasing the demand for office
furniture in 2010. 2010 revenue declines were broad-based,
significantly affecting almost all of our geographies, vertical
markets and product categories. However, percentage declines
compared to the prior year began to moderate in Q4 2010, as we
entered this downturn beginning in Q3 2009.
Cost of sales increased to 70.7% of revenue in 2010, a
40 basis point deterioration compared to 2009. The
deterioration was driven largely by lower absorption of fixed
costs associated with the revenue decline, partially mitigated
by benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts. The deterioration was also offset by
approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
210 basis points due to lower commodity costs,
|
|
|
|
190 basis points due to an increase in variable life COLI
income and
|
|
|
|
80 basis points related to temporary reductions in employee
salaries and retirement benefits.
|
Operating expenses decreased by $194.5 compared to 2009. The
decrease was primarily due to benefits from restructuring
activities and other cost reduction efforts and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in variable life COLI income of $32,
|
|
|
|
a reduction of $27 in variable compensation expense,
|
|
|
|
temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits of $21,
|
|
|
|
an $8.5 impairment charge in 2009 related to an asset classified
as held for sale, and
|
|
|
|
favorable currency translation effects of $7.
|
There were no goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
in 2010. Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges in
2009 were primarily related to PolyVision, which is included in
the Other category. These charges were primarily due to the
impact of the substantial decline in our stock price and market
capitalization. As part of our annual goodwill impairment
testing, we prepared a reconciliation of the fair value of our
reporting units to our adjusted market capitalization as of
February 27, 2009. Through this reconciliation process, we
determined the fair value of PolyVision (using a discounted cash
flow method) was less than its carrying value, resulting in
non-cash impairment charges of $63.0 in Q4 2009.
We recorded restructuring costs of $34.9 in 2010 compared to
$37.9 in 2009. The 2010 charges primarily related to the
consolidation of additional manufacturing and distribution
facilities and employee termination costs related to the
reduction of our global white-collar workforce. See further
discussion and detail of these items in the Segment
Disclosure analysis below and in Note 20 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Our 2010 effective tax rate was favorably impacted by
significant non-taxable income associated with increases in cash
surrender value of COLI and negatively impacted by increases in
valuation allowances of $8.9. See Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
19
Interest Expense,
Investment Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Interest Expense, Investment Income and
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Miscellaneous, net
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning in Q1 2011, Investment income includes gains
and losses from variable life COLI policies. See Note 9 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates increased in the
current year primarily due to an increase in equity in earnings
of our unconsolidated dealer relationships. See Note 11 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Segment
Disclosure
We operate on a worldwide basis within North America and
International reportable segments plus an Other
category. Our Other category includes the Coalesse Group,
PolyVision and IDEO (through Q3 2011). Unallocated
corporate expenses are reported as Corporate. Additional
information about our reportable segments is contained in
Item 1: Business and Note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements included within this report.
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
North America
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,322.2
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,740.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
940.9
|
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
|
|
|
877.1
|
|
|
|
|
70.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,256.4
|
|
|
|
|
72.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
375.7
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
353.3
|
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
469.6
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
318.4
|
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
|
293.5
|
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
394.5
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthNorth America
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,740.0
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations and divestitures
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
1,184.4
|
|
|
|
|
1,719.0
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
1,322.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline)
|
|
|
$
|
137.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
(481.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline) %
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating IncomeNorth America
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
(40.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income
|
|
|
$
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
131.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In Q1 2011, we began considering our investments in variable
life COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate
liquidity. As a result of this change beginning in Q1 2011, COLI
income related to our investments in variable life COLI policies
has been recorded in Investment income on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The variable life COLI
income (loss) previously included in operating income is
excluded for comparative purposes. |
2011 compared
to 2010
Operating income in North America remained relatively flat in
2011 compared to 2010, which included $32.9 of variable life
COLI income. Adjusted operating income increased by $29.0,
primarily driven by operating leverage from organic revenue
growth and benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts, partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $10 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009 levels,
|
|
|
|
incremental variable compensation expense of approximately $6
related to a gain on sale of a facility, which was recorded as a
restructuring item, and a gain from the IDEO ownership
transition, which was recorded in Corporate,
|
|
|
|
current year charges related to a product recall and an
impairment related to an asset held for sale totaling $8 and
|
|
|
|
increased commodity costs of approximately $8.
|
North America revenue represented 54.3% of consolidated revenue
in 2011. Revenue for 2011 was $1,322.2 compared to $1,237.4 in
2010, representing organic revenue growth of 12% after adjusting
for dealer deconsolidations and currency translation effects.
Revenue growth was broad-based with notable vertical market
growth reflected in financial services, technical/professional,
higher education, healthcare and government. In addition,
seating revenue growth was the strongest across our product
categories.
21
Cost of sales increased to 71.2% of revenue in 2011, a
30 basis point deterioration compared to 2010. Excluding
the 150 basis point favorable impact of variable life COLI
income in 2010, cost of sales improved by 120 basis points,
which was largely driven by higher absorption of fixed costs
associated with organic revenue growth and benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts,
partially offset by higher commodity costs and a product
specific warranty charge related to a retrofit project.
Operating expenses increased by $24.9 in 2011 compared to 2010
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
higher variable compensation expense of $16 related to our
EVA-based compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
variable life COLI income in 2010 of $13.6 and
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $7 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009 levels.
|
These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $20.6
from dealer deconsolidations as well as benefits of
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts.
Restructuring costs of $6.4 incurred in 2011 primarily related
to the consolidation of manufacturing facilities. In addition,
Q4 2011 included a $10.6 gain related to the sale and leaseback
of a facility in Canada offset by $10.1 of restructuring costs
associated with the planned closure of three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our ongoing
efforts to improve the fitness of our business and strengthen
the Companys long-term competitiveness. We expect to move
production within these facilities to other Steelcase locations
in North America over the next 18 months. We estimate the
cash restructuring costs associated with these actions will be
approximately $45 million, with approximately
$30 million related to workforce reductions and
approximately $15 million related to costs associated with
manufacturing consolidation and production moves. We anticipate
annualized savings from these actions to be approximately $35
when fully implemented in 2013.
2010 compared
to 2009
Operating income in the North America segment decreased by $10.3
in 2010 compared to 2009. The 2010 adjusted operating income of
$33.9 represented a decline of $97.4 compared to the prior year
primarily due to the reduction in volume, mostly offset by lower
commodity costs, benefits from restructuring activities and
other cost reduction efforts and temporary reductions in
employee salaries and retirement benefits.
North America revenue, which accounted for 54.0% of consolidated
2010 revenue, decreased by $502.6 or 28.9% from 2009,
representing an organic revenue decline of 28% primarily due to
decreased volume across most of our vertical markets (except for
the U.S. Federal government) and product categories. The
revenue declines within higher education, state and local
government and healthcare were less than the declines
experienced in other vertical markets. In addition, the revenue
decline in the financial services vertical market was lower than
the average decline in 2010, as this vertical market entered the
downturn earlier than other markets and experienced a
significant decline in 2009.
Cost of sales as a percent of revenue decreased 130 basis
points compared to the prior year. 2010 results benefited from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts. The
improvement was also driven by approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
350 basis points of a favorable impact related to an
increase in variable life COLI income,
|
|
|
|
300 basis points due to lower commodity costs and
|
|
|
|
130 basis points related to temporary reductions in
employee salaries and retirement benefits.
|
These benefits more than offset the negative effects of lower
fixed cost absorption related to lower volume.
22
Operating expenses decreased by $101.0 in 2010 compared to 2009
primarily due to benefits from restructuring activities and
other cost reduction efforts and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in variable life COLI income of $31,
|
|
|
|
temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits of $17,
|
|
|
|
lower variable compensation expense of $14 and
|
|
|
|
non-cash impairment charges of $12 in 2009.
|
Restructuring costs of $10.4 in 2010 primarily consisted of
employee termination costs related to the reduction of our
white-collar workforce and the closure of manufacturing
facilities.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations DataInternational
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
490.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.2
|
|
|
|
|
454.1
|
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
|
629.1
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
189.5
|
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
176.0
|
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
292.8
|
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
201.1
|
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
204.9
|
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
|
250.1
|
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthInternational
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations and divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
(31.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
610.6
|
|
|
|
|
889.2
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
88.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(247.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)International
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
2011 compared
to 2010
International reported an operating loss of $13.9 in 2011
compared to an operating loss of $35.5 in 2010. Adjusted
operating income of $7.1 represents an improvement of $24.5
compared to 2010. Overall, the profit improvement was primarily
driven by operating leverage from organic revenue growth and
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts, offset in part by higher commodity costs and other
operating costs.
Our results in the United Kingdom continued to be negatively
affected by unfavorable currency impacts, and we continued to
fund our expansionary efforts in China and India. In the
aggregate, these businesses reported an operating loss of
approximately $10 in 2011, $24 in 2010 and $19 in 2009.
International revenue represented 28.7% of consolidated revenue
in 2011. Revenue for 2011 was $698.9 compared to $641.6 in 2010,
representing organic revenue growth of 14% after adjusting for
currency translation effects. During 2011, all regions reported
organic revenue growth, with notable increases in Germany, Asia
Pacific, Latin America and Spain.
Cost of sales decreased to 70.2% of revenue in 2011, a
60 basis point improvement compared to 2010. The
improvement was mainly due to higher absorption of fixed costs
associated with organic revenue growth and benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts,
offset in part by higher commodity costs.
2011 operating expenses decreased by $3.8 due to benefits
from restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts
and favorable currency translation effects of approximately $7,
offset by higher variable compensation expense related to our
EVA-based compensation plans and higher bad debt charges.
Restructuring costs of $21.0 incurred in 2011 primarily related
to the project to reorganize our European manufacturing
operations. We expect to incur a total of approximately $21 of
cash restructuring costs in connection with this project, with
the majority relating to workforce reductions and some
additional costs for manufacturing consolidation and production
moves. The total estimated cost is slightly higher than our
previous estimates because more employees than anticipated
accepted the severance offer. While the estimated costs have
increased, these additional departures will provide greater
staffing flexibility at our manufacturing facilities. We
anticipate annualized savings from these actions to be
approximately $8 when fully implemented by the end of Q1 2012.
2010 compared
to 2009
International reported an operating loss of $35.5 in 2010
compared to operating income of $41.0 in 2009. The adjusted
operating loss of $17.4 represented a decrease of $60.7 compared
to the prior year primarily due to a significant decline in
revenue. Cost reduction efforts were only able to offset a
portion of the negative effect of lower volume, as the pace of
cost structure changes in our larger International markets was
tempered by the process of negotiating with the related
workers councils.
International revenue, which accounted for 28.0% of consolidated
2010 revenue, declined by $280.6 or 30.4%, representing an
organic revenue decline of 28%. The decrease in revenue was
primarily due to the impact of the global economic slowdown on
the demand for office furniture across all International
markets. The 2010 revenue percentage declines within China,
Eastern Europe, the United Kingdom and Latin America were deeper
than those experienced in other geographic regions.
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue increased by
260 basis points in 2010 compared to 2009. The 2010
deterioration was almost entirely due to lower fixed cost
absorption related to lower volume, partially offset by benefits
from restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts.
The deterioration was also partially offset by approximately
120 basis points related to lower commodity costs.
Operating expenses decreased by $45.2 compared to 2009 primarily
due to benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts, a reduction in variable compensation expense
of $8 and favorable currency translation effects of $7.
24
Restructuring costs of $18.1 incurred in 2010 primarily
consisted of employee termination costs related to workforce
reductions, mainly in Europe, as well as consolidation of
manufacturing in Asia.
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations DataOther
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
416.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
521.5
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
262.2
|
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
|
|
288.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
|
351.2
|
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
152.3
|
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
120.5
|
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
|
160.7
|
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
127.6
|
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
|
132.2
|
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
|
172.9
|
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthOther
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
521.5
|
|
IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
383.7
|
|
|
|
|
521.5
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
416.0
|
|
|
|
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(108.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)Other
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 compared
to 2010
Our Other category includes the Coalesse Group, PolyVision and
IDEO (through Q3 2011). Operating income in the Other category
increased by $37.6 in 2011 compared to 2010. Adjusted operating
income improved by $34.4 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
operational improvements and business mix within the Coalesse
group,
|
|
|
|
improvements at PolyVision as a result of growth in higher
margin Technology and Surfaces product categories and benefits
from the 2010 exit of lower margin businesses in the U.S.,
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts and
|
|
|
|
revenue growth at IDEO through Q3 2011.
|
2011 revenue in the Other category increased by $3.3
compared to 2010, representing organic growth of 8% after
adjusting for the IDEO ownership transition. The Coalesse Group
and PolyVision both experienced single digit revenue growth;
however, excluding the impact of businesses exited in 2010,
PolyVision revenue increased by 17%. IDEO experienced a
significant increase in revenue through Q3 2011 compared to
the same period last year as a result of a number of large
consulting projects.
Cost of sales in the Other category as a percent of revenue
improved by 700 basis points compared to 2010 primarily due
to:
|
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities, operational improvements
and business mix within the Coalesse Group and
|
|
|
|
improvements at PolyVision as a result of growth in higher
margin Technology and Surfaces product categories and benefits
from the 2010 exit of lower margin businesses in the U.S.
|
Operating expenses in the Other category decreased by $4.6 due
to $10.4 from the IDEO deconsolidation in Q4 2011 offset by
higher variable compensation expense related to our EVA-based
compensation plans.
Restructuring costs of $3.2 in 2011 primarily related to the
consolidation of manufacturing facilities.
On December 14, 2010, certain members of the management of
IDEO who collectively owned 20% of IDEO purchased an additional
60% equity interest in IDEO pursuant to an agreement entered
into during 2008. We retained a 20% equity interest in IDEO, and
we expect to continue our collaborative relationship. This
transaction generated $30 of cash and resulted in a Q4 2011
pre-tax gain of $9, net of incremental variable compensation
expense. In Q4 2011, we deconsolidated the operations of IDEO
and recorded our share of IDEOs earnings as equity in
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Note 19 consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
2010 compared
to 2009
The Other category reported an operating loss of $14.6 in 2010
compared to an operating loss of $79.3 in 2009. The adjusted
operating loss represented a decline of $5.6 compared to the
prior year primarily due to the revenue decline, offset by
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts and temporary reductions in employee salaries and
retirement benefits.
2010 revenue decreased by $108.8 or 20.9% compared to 2009.
The Coalesse Group experienced a 29% decline, while IDEO and
PolyVision posted much lower revenue declines of 13% and 11%,
respectively.
Cost of sales as a percent of revenue increased by
270 basis points in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a
result of lower fixed cost absorption related to lower volume.
The negative volume effect was partially offset by benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts and
lower commodity costs, as well as initial benefits from the exit
of the final portion of the PolyVision public-bid contractor
whiteboard fabrication business in North America.
Operating expenses decreased by $40.7 compared to 2009 primarily
due to benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts, lower variable compensation expense and
temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits. There were no goodwill and intangible assets
impairment charges in 2010.
Restructuring costs of $6.4 in 2010 primarily related to the
closure of two manufacturing facilities: one within the Coalesse
Group and one at PolyVision.
26
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Statement of Operations DataCorporate
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 82% of corporate expenses were charged to the
operating segments in 2011, 2010 and 2009 as part of a corporate
allocation. Unallocated portions of these expenses are
considered general corporate costs and are reported as
Corporate. Corporate costs include unallocated portions of
executive costs and shared service functions such as information
technology, human resources, finance, legal, research and
development and corporate facilities.
2011 operating expenses include a $13.2 gain from the
ownership transition of IDEO. Related variable compensation
expense was allocated among the North America and International
segments, the Other category and Corporate. Excluding this gain,
the increase in Corporate operating expenses primarily relates
to higher variable compensation expense related to our EVA-based
incentive compensation plans in the current year.
Corporate costs decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due
to temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits, lower variable compensation expense and other
reductions in discretionary spending.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Liquidity
Based on current business conditions, we target a minimum of
$100 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments to
fund
day-to-day
operations, to provide available liquidity for investments in
growth initiatives and as a cushion against economic volatility.
Our actual cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as we plan for
and manage certain seasonal disbursements, particularly the
annual payment of accrued variable compensation and retirement
plan contributions in Q1 of each fiscal year, when applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Primary Liquidity Sources
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Variable life COLI
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability under credit facilities
|
|
|
|
165.7
|
|
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total primary liquidity sources
|
|
|
$
|
769.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of February 25, 2011, we held a total of $493.0 in cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments, including
$246.9 from the net proceeds received in Q4 2011 from the
issuance of unsecured unsubordinated senior notes, due in
February 2021. The net proceeds were invested in short-term
managed investment accounts and are expected to be used,
together with available cash on hand, to repay the outstanding
$250 aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% senior notes
due August 15, 2011. There are no restrictions on the use
or access of these assets. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
Of our total cash and cash equivalents, approximately 63% was
located in the U.S. and the remaining 37% was located
outside of the U.S., primarily in France, Asia and Canada. The
majority of our short-term investments are maintained in the
U.S. in a managed investment portfolio, which primarily
consists of U.S. agency debt securities,
U.S. government debt securities, corporate debt securities
and municipal debt securities.
27
In Q1 2011, we began considering investments in variable life
COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate liquidity.
Accordingly, during Q1 2011, we set the allocation of our
investments in variable life COLI policies to a more
conservative profile with a heavier weighting to fixed income
securities. In addition, our investments in whole life COLI
policies represent a potential source of liquidity. The whole
life and variable life policies are recorded at their net cash
surrender values. We believe the financial strength of the
issuing insurance companies associated with our variable and
whole life COLI policies are sufficient to meet their
obligations to us. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements for more information.
Availability under credit facilities may be reduced by the use
of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments for
purposes other than the repayment of debt as a result of
constraints related to our maximum leverage ratio covenant. See
Liquidity Facilities for more information.
The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of
cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
(132.2
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(96.3
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow DataOperating Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
Changes in accounts receivable, inventories, and accounts
payable, net of deconsolidation
|
|
|
|
(59.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of COLI
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
Changes in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Changes in employee compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(52.5
|
)
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of
deconsolidation
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
(20.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(67.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in cash provided by operating activities in 2011
compared to cash used in operating activities in 2010 was
primarily due to cash generated from net income and the receipt
of a U.S. income tax refund, partially offset by a use of
cash for working capital due to the increase in revenue.
28
Cash provided by
(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow DataInvesting Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
$
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(83.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Proceeds from IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
|
(335.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
Liquidations of investments
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Business divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
$
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in 2011 were primarily related to
investments in product development in North America and
International, and included progress payments totaling $10.2
towards a replacement corporate aircraft. We received proceeds
from the IDEO ownership transition and the sale of facilities in
Canada and Malaysia. Purchases of investments include the
short-term investment of the net proceeds from the issuance of
senior notes in Q4 2011.
Cash provided by
(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow DataFinancing Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Borrowings (repayments) of short-term and long-term debt, net
|
|
|
$
|
243.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases, net of issuances
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
$
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(132.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q4 2011, we issued $250 in unsecured unsubordinated senior
notes, due in February 2021. Proceeds, net of bond discount and
issuance costs, totaled $246.9 and were invested in short-term
managed investment accounts. We expect to use the net proceeds,
together with available cash on hand, to repay the outstanding
$250 aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% senior notes
due August 15, 2011. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The primary use of cash in financing activities continues to
relate to dividends paid on our common stock.
We paid dividends of $0.04 per common share during all quarters
in 2011 and the last three quarters of 2010 and $0.08 per common
share during the first quarter of 2010. We paid dividends of
$0.08 per share in Q4 2009 and $0.15 per share in Q1, Q2 and Q3
2009. On March 23, 2011 our Board of Directors declared a
dividend of $0.06 per common share to be paid in Q1 2012.
During 2011, 2010 and 2009, we made common stock repurchases of
$10.8, $4.6 and $59.2, respectively, all of which related to our
Class A Common Stock. As of February 25, 2011, we had
$200.9 of remaining availability under the $250 share
repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors in Q4
2008. We have no outstanding share repurchase commitments.
29
Share repurchases of Class A Common Stock to enable
participants to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon vesting
of restricted stock and restricted stock units, pursuant to the
terms of our Incentive Compensation Plan, were $0.7, $0.4 and
$1.7 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Capital
Resources
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We are contingently liable under loan and lease guarantees for
certain Steelcase dealers and joint ventures in the event of
default or non-performance of the financial repayment of a
liability. In certain cases, we also guarantee completion of
contracts by our dealers. Due to the contingent nature of
guarantees, the full value of the guarantees is not recorded on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets; however, when necessary we
record reserves to cover potential losses. See Note 17 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Contractual
Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of February 25, 2011 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Long-term debt and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
$
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
281.2
|
|
Estimated interest on debt obligations
|
|
|
|
174.6
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
|
163.2
|
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
Committed capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit and compensation obligations
|
|
|
|
250.8
|
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
|
85.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
1,200.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
466.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
149.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
472.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated debt as of February 25, 2011 was $546.8.
Of our total debt, $249.9 is in the form of term notes due in
August 2011, $249.9 is in the form of term notes due in February
2021 and $43.1 is related to financing secured by our two
corporate aircraft.
We have commitments related to certain sales offices, showrooms,
warehouses and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases
that expire at various dates through 2021. Minimum payments
under operating leases, net of sublease rental income, are
presented in the contractual obligations table above.
Committed capital expenditures represent obligations we have
related to property, plant and equipment purchases and include
an outstanding commitment of $19.8 to purchase one corporate
aircraft that is intended to replace an existing aircraft.
We define purchase obligations as non-cancelable signed
contracts to purchase goods or services beyond the needs of
meeting current backlog or production.
Other liabilities represent obligations for foreign exchange
forward contracts.
Employee benefit obligations represent contributions and benefit
payments expected to be made for our post-retirement, pension,
deferred compensation, defined contribution, severance
arrangements and variable compensation plans. Our obligations
related to post-retirement benefit plans are not contractual and
the plans could be amended at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. We limited our disclosure
of contributions and benefit payments to 10 years as
information beyond this time period was not available. See
Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
30
The contractual obligations table above is current as of
February 25, 2011. The amounts of these obligations could
change materially over time as new contracts or obligations are
initiated and existing contracts or obligations are terminated
or modified.
Liquidity
Facilities
Our total liquidity facilities as of February 25, 2011 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Liquidity Facilities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Global committed bank facility
|
|
|
$
|
125.0
|
|
Various uncommitted lines
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit lines available
|
|
|
|
168.8
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available capacity
|
|
|
$
|
165.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our $125 global committed, syndicated credit facility expires in
Q4 2013. As of February 25, 2011, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the facility. The facility requires us to
satisfy financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio
covenant and a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant.
Additionally, the facility requires us to comply with certain
other terms and conditions, including a restricted payment
covenant which establishes a maximum level of dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments (such as share
repurchases) we may make in a fiscal year. As of
February 25, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants
under the facility. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The various uncommitted lines may be changed or cancelled by the
banks at any time. Outstanding borrowings on uncommitted
facilities of $3.0 as of February 25, 2011 were primarily
related to short-term liquidity management within our
International segment. In addition, we have a revolving letter
of credit agreement for $15.5 of which $14.5 was utilized
primarily related to our self-insured workers compensation
programs as of February 25, 2011. There were no draws on
our standby letters of credit during 2011. See Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Total consolidated debt as of February 25, 2011 was $546.8.
Our debt primarily consists of $249.9 in term notes due in Q2
2012 (2012 Notes) with an effective interest rate of
6.3% and $249.9 in term notes due in Q4 2021 (2021
Notes) with an effective interest rate of 6.6%. The 2012
Notes are classified as short-term in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets as they are due within one year. The 2021 Notes were
issued in Q4 2011, and the proceeds of the notes have been
invested in short-term investments. It is our intention to use
these funds and other available cash on hand to pay off the 2012
Notes when they come due. In addition, we have a $43.1 term loan
due in Q2 2017 at a floating interest rate based on
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.35%. The term notes are unsecured, the term loan is
secured by our two corporate aircraft, and neither the term
notes nor the term loan contain financial covenants or are
cross-defaulted to other debt facilities. See Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Liquidity
Outlook
Our current cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances, funds available from COLI, funds available under our
credit facilities and cash generated from future operations are
expected to be sufficient to finance our known or foreseeable
liquidity needs. We believe there are indicators that most
geographies and markets around the world have emerged from the
adverse impacts of the global economic recession, although the
strength and continuity of the economic recovery remain
uncertain which may continue to challenge our level of cash
generation from operations. We continue to maintain a
conservative approach to liquidity and maintain flexibility over
significant uses of cash including our capital expenditures and
discretionary operating expenses.
31
It is our current intention to repay the 2012 Notes at or before
maturity with the proceeds from the 2021 Notes and other
available cash on hand. Our other significant funding
requirements include operating expenses, non-cancelable
operating lease obligations, capital expenditures, variable
compensation and retirement plan contributions, dividend
payments and debt service obligations.
We expect capital expenditures to total approximately $70 in
2012 compared to $46 in 2011. This amount includes progress
payments associated with a replacement corporate aircraft
totaling $20 and approximately $10 in spending on corporate
facilities as a result of campus consolidation. We closely
manage capital spending to ensure we are making investments that
we believe will sustain our business and preserve our ability to
introduce innovative new products.
In Q4 2011, we announced our intention to close three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our
ongoing efforts to improve the fitness of our business and
strengthen the Companys long-term competitiveness. We
estimate the cash restructuring costs associated with these
actions will be approximately $45 to be paid over the next
18 months related to workforce reductions and costs
associated with manufacturing consolidation and production
moves. We anticipate annualized savings from these actions to be
approximately $35 when fully implemented in 2013.
On March 23, 2011, we announced a quarterly dividend on our
common stock of $0.06 per share, or $7.9 to be paid in Q1 2012.
Future dividends will be subject to approval by our Board of
Directors.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our
consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These principles require the use
of estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and
disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on
historical data and managements knowledge of current
events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual
results may differ from the estimates if different conditions
occur. The accounting estimates that typically involve a higher
degree of judgment and complexity are listed and explained
below. These estimates were discussed with the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors and affect all segments of the Company.
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price
and the related underlying tangible and identifiable intangible
net asset values resulting from business acquisitions. Annually
in Q4, or earlier if conditions indicate it is necessary, the
carrying value of the reporting unit is compared to an estimate
of its fair value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the carrying value, goodwill is impaired and
is written down to its estimated fair value. Goodwill is
assigned to and the fair value is tested at the reporting unit
level. We evaluated goodwill and intangible assets using six
reporting units where goodwill is recordedspecifically,
North America; Europe and Asia Pacific within the International
segment; and Coalesse, Designtex and PolyVision within the Other
category.
Annually in Q4, or earlier if conditions indicate it is
necessary, we perform an impairment analysis of our intangible
assets not subject to amortization using an income approach
based on the cash flows attributable to the related products. We
also perform an impairment analysis of our intangible assets
subject to amortization during interim periods upon the
occurrence of certain events or changes in circumstance. An
impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. In testing for
impairment, we first determine if the asset is recoverable and
then compare the discounted cash flows over the assets
remaining life to the carrying value.
32
As of February 25, 2011, we had $174.8 of goodwill and
$21.7 of net intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible
|
|
Reportable Segment
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
Assets, Net
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
57.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Other category
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During Q4 2011, we performed our annual impairment assessment of
goodwill in our reporting units. In the first step to test for
potential impairment, we measured the estimated fair value of
our reporting units using a discounted cash flow valuation
(DCF) method and reconciled the fair value of our
reporting units to the sum of our total market capitalization
plus a control premium (our adjusted market
capitalization). The control premium represents an
estimate associated with obtaining control of the company in an
acquisition of the outstanding shares of Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock. The DCF analysis used the
present value of projected cash flows and a residual value.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the
impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows in
measuring fair value. Assumptions used in our impairment
valuations, such as forecasted growth rates and cost of capital,
are consistent with our current internal projections.
As part of the reconciliation to our adjusted market
capitalization, we made adjustments to the estimated future cash
flows, as well as the discount rates used in calculating the
estimated fair value of the reporting units. The discount rates
ranged from 10.5% to 13.0%. Due to the subjective nature of this
reconciliation process, these assumptions could change over
time, which may result in future impairment charges.
As of the valuation date, the enterprise value available for
goodwill determined by each method described above is in excess
of the underlying reported value of goodwill as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
|
|
|
Available in Excess
|
|
Reportable Segment
|
|
|
of Goodwill
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
377.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
355.0
|
|
Other category
|
|
|
|
121.0
|
|
For each reporting unit, the excess enterprise value available
for goodwill is primarily driven by the residual value of future
years. Thus, increasing the discount rate by 1%, leaving all
other assumptions unchanged, would reduce the enterprise value
in excess of goodwill to the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
|
|
|
Available in Excess
|
|
Reportable Segment
|
|
|
of Goodwill
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
263.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
277.0
|
|
Other category
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
Based on the sensitivity analysis above, no reporting units
would have had goodwill balances in excess of enterprise value
available for goodwill.
See Note 2 and Note 10 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
Income
Taxes
Our annual effective tax rate is based on income, statutory tax
rates and tax planning strategies available in various
jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and
subject to different
33
interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental
taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in
determining our tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. Tax
positions are reviewed quarterly and balances are adjusted as
new information becomes available.
We are audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service under
the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). Under CAP,
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service works with large business
taxpayers to identify and resolve issues prior to the filing of
a tax return. Accordingly, we expect to record minimal
liabilities for U.S. Federal uncertain tax positions. Tax
positions are reviewed regularly for state, local and
non-U.S. tax
liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions. Our
liability for uncertain tax positions in these jurisdictions is
$0.1.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
the temporary differences are expected to reverse. In evaluating
our ability to recover deferred tax assets within the
jurisdiction from which they arise, we consider all positive and
negative evidence. These assumptions require significant
judgment and are developed using forecasts of future taxable
income that are consistent with the internal plans and estimates
we are using to manage the underlying business.
Future tax benefits of tax loss and credit carryforwards are
recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is
considered more likely than not. As of February 25, 2011,
we estimate a potential tax benefit from the operating loss
carryforwards before valuation allowances of $96.1, but we have
recorded a valuation allowance of $32.6, which reduced our
realized tax benefit to $63.5. Additionally, we have recognized
tax benefits from tax credit carryforwards of $35.1. It is
considered more likely than not that a combined benefit of $98.6
will be realized on these carryforwards in future periods. This
determination is based on the expectation that related
operations will be sufficiently profitable or various tax,
business and other planning strategies will enable us to utilize
the carryforwards. To the extent that available evidence raises
doubt about the realization of a deferred tax asset, a valuation
allowance is established.
As of February 25, 2011, we have recorded a partial
valuation allowance of $27.8 on certain net operating loss
carryforwards of $76.6. These carryforward benefits relate to
jurisdictions that allow indefinite carryforward periods and in
which we have reported cumulative operating losses in the most
recent three years. Our judgment regarding the utilization of
these net operating losses is based on our conclusion that we
have sufficient evidence that it is more likely than not that we
will generate future taxable income in these jurisdictions. The
key factors that we considered in our analysis included the
impact of restructuring activities and tax planning strategies,
as well as the impact of the cyclical nature of our business on
future sales levels. Our judgment related to the realization of
the deferred tax assets is based on current and expected market
conditions and could change in the event market conditions and
our profitability in these jurisdictions differ significantly
from our current estimates.
A 10% decrease in the expected amount of benefit to be realized
on the carryforwards would have resulted in a decrease in net
income for 2011 of approximately $10.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded
deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. In March
2010, the U.S. enacted significant healthcare reform
legislation for tax years beginning after December 31,
2012. This legislation effectively changes the tax treatment of
the federal subsidies received by employers who provide certain
prescription drug benefits for retirees (the Medicare
Part D subsidy). We are required to recognize the
impact of the tax law change in the period in which the law is
enacted. In Q1 2011, we recognized a reduction in deferred tax
assets related to the Medicare Part D subsidy with an
offsetting increase in income tax expense of $11.4. We are not
aware of any other such tax law or rate changes that would have
a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or
financial position.
See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
34
Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The Company sponsors a number of domestic and foreign plans to
provide pension, medical and life insurance benefits to retired
employees. As of February 25, 2011 and February 26,
2010, the benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets and
funded status of these plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
$
|
87.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
131.8
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
$
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(110.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(131.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The post-retirement medical and life insurance plans are
unfunded, but our investments in whole life COLI policies are
intended to be utilized as a long-term funding source for these
benefit obligations. The asset values of the whole life COLI
policies are not segregated in a trust specifically for the
plans, thus are not considered plan assets. Changes in the
values of these policies have no effect on the post-retirement
benefits expense or benefit obligations recorded in the
consolidated financial statements.
As of February 25, 2011, approximately 75% of our unfunded
defined benefit pension obligations related to our non-qualified
supplemental retirement plan that is limited to a select group
of management approved by the Compensation Committee. This plan
is unfunded, but our investments in whole life COLI policies are
intended to be utilized as a long-term funding source for these
benefit obligations. The asset values of the whole life COLI
policies are not segregated in a trust specifically for the
plan, thus are not considered plan assets. Changes in the values
of these policies have no effect on the defined benefit pension
expense or benefit obligations recorded in the consolidated
financial statements.
We recognize the cost of benefits provided during retirement
over the employees active working lives. Inherent in this
approach is the requirement to use various actuarial assumptions
to predict and measure costs and obligations many years prior to
the settlement date. Key actuarial assumptions that require
significant management judgment and have a material impact on
the measurement of our consolidated benefits expense and benefit
obligations include, among others, the discount rate and health
cost trend rates. These assumptions are reviewed with our
actuaries and updated annually based on relevant external and
internal factors and information, including, but not limited to,
benefit payments, expenses paid from the fund, rates of
termination, medical inflation, technology and quality care
changes, regulatory requirements, plan changes and governmental
coverage changes.
To conduct our annual review of discount rates, we perform a
matching exercise of projected plan cash flows against spot
rates on a yield curve comprised of high quality corporate bonds
as of the measurement date (Ryan ALM
45/95
curve) with a primary focus for our domestic plans. The
measurement dates for our retiree benefit plans are consistent
with our fiscal year-end. Accordingly, we select discount rates
to measure our benefit obligations that are consistent with
market indices at the end of each year.
Based on consolidated benefit obligations as of
February 25, 2011, a one percentage point decline in the
weighted-average discount rate used for benefit plan measurement
purposes would have changed the 2011 consolidated benefits
expense by less than $1 and changed the consolidated benefit
obligations by approximately $17. All obligation-related
experience gains and losses are amortized using a straight-line
method over the average remaining service period of active plan
participants.
To conduct our annual review of healthcare cost trend rates, we
model our actual claims cost data over a historical period,
including an analysis of pre-65 versus post-65 age groups and
other important demographic components of our covered retiree
population. This data is adjusted to eliminate the impact of
plan changes and other factors that would tend to distort the
underlying cost inflation trends. Our initial healthcare cost
trend rate is reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary to
remain consistent with recent historical experience and our
expectations regarding short-term future trends. As of
35
February 25, 2011, our initial rates of 8.58% for
pre-age 65 retirees and 6.86% for post-age 65 retirees
were trended downward by each year, until the ultimate trend
rate of 4.5% is reached. The ultimate trend rate is adjusted
annually, as necessary, to approximate the current economic view
on the rate of long-term inflation plus an appropriate
healthcare cost premium.
Based on consolidated benefit obligations as of
February 25, 2011, a one percentage point increase or
decrease in the assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have
changed the 2011 consolidated benefits expense by less than $1
and changed the consolidated benefit obligations by
approximately $2. All experience gains and losses are amortized
using a straight-line method, over at least the minimum
amortization period prescribed by accounting guidance.
Despite the previously described policies for selecting key
actuarial assumptions, we periodically experience material
differences between assumed and actual experience. As of
February 25, 2011, we had consolidated unamortized prior
service credits and net experience gains of $22.9, as compared
to $7.0 as of February 26, 2010, recorded in Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
Forward-Looking
Statements
From time to time, in written and oral statements, we discuss
our expectations regarding future events and our plans and
objectives for future operations. These forward-looking
statements discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to
future trends, plans, events, results of operations or financial
condition, or state other information relating to us, based on
current beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by,
and information currently available to, us. Forward-looking
statements generally are accompanied by words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, forecast,
intend, may, possible,
potential, predict, project,
or other similar words, phrases or expressions. Although we
believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable, they
are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future
conditions, any or all of which may ultimately prove to be
inaccurate. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from
our expectations because of factors such as, but not limited to,
competitive and general economic conditions domestically and
internationally; acts of terrorism, war, governmental action,
natural disasters and other Force Majeure events; changes in the
legal and regulatory environment; our restructuring activities;
changes in raw materials and commodity costs; currency
fluctuations; changes in customer demands; and the other risks
and contingencies detailed in this Report and our other filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no
obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for
information regarding recently issued accounting standards.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:
|
We are exposed to market risks from foreign currency exchange,
interest rates, commodity prices and fixed income and equity
prices, which could affect our operating results, financial
position and cash flows.
Foreign Currency
Exchange Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk primarily
on sales commitments, anticipated sales and purchases and assets
and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. We transact business in 16 primary currencies
worldwide, of which the most significant in 2011 were the
36
euro, the Canadian dollar and the pound sterling. Revenue from
foreign locations represented approximately 38% of our
consolidated revenue in 2011, 36% in 2010 and 37% in 2009. We
actively manage the foreign currency exposures that are
associated with committed foreign currency purchases and sales
created in the normal course of business at the local entity
level. Exposures that cannot be naturally offset within a local
entity to an immaterial amount are often hedged with foreign
currency derivatives or netted with offsetting exposures at
other entities. Our results are affected by the strength of the
currencies in countries where we manufacture or purchase goods
relative to the strength of the currencies in countries where
our products are sold.
We estimate that an additional 10% strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against local currencies would have decreased
operating income by approximately $2 in 2011, assuming no
changes other than the exchange rate itself. However, this
quantitative measure has inherent limitations. The sensitivity
analysis disregards the possibility that rates can move in
opposite directions and that gains from one currency may or may
not be offset by losses from another currency.
The translation of the assets and liabilities of our
international subsidiaries is made using the foreign currency
exchange rates as of the end of the fiscal year. Translation
adjustments are not included in determining net income but are
disclosed in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
within shareholders equity on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets until a sale or substantially complete liquidation of the
net investment in the international subsidiary takes place. In
certain markets, we could recognize a significant gain or loss
related to unrealized cumulative translation adjustments if we
were to exit the market and liquidate our net investment. As of
February 25, 2011, the cumulative net currency translation
adjustments reduced shareholders equity by $18.6.
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses reflect transaction
gains and losses, which arise from monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in currencies other than a business
units functional currency. For 2011, net transaction
losses were $1.2.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
Interest Rate
Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily on our short-term
and long-term investments and short-term and long-term
borrowings. Our short-term investments are primarily invested in
U.S. agency debt securities, U.S. government debt
securities and corporate debt securities. Additionally we held
$16.7 investments in auction rate securities and Canadian
$5.0 par asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
as of February 25, 2011, which are classified as long-term
investments as no liquid markets currently exist for these
securities. The risk on our short-term and long-term borrowings
is primarily related to a $43.1 loan, which bears a floating
interest rate based on
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.35%.
We estimate a 1% increase in interest rates would not have a
material impact on our results of operations or financial
condition, as we expect the higher interest expense would be
offset by an increase in interest income on our investments.
Significant changes in interest rates could have an impact on
the market value of our managed fixed-income investment
portfolio. However, as of February 25, 2011, approximately
80% of our fixed-income investments mature within one year,
approximately 10% in two years and approximately 10% in three to
five years, which mitigates the impact that interest rate
changes would have on the market value of these investments.
Accordingly, we believe that any change in interest rates would
not have a material impact on our results of operations or
financial condition. This quantitative measure has inherent
limitations since not all of our investments are in similar
asset classes. In addition, our investment manager actively
manages certain investments, thus our results could be better or
worse than market returns.
See Note 6 and Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
37
Commodity Price
Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risk primarily on our raw
materials inventory. These raw materials are not rare or unique
to our industry. The cost of steel, aluminum, other metals,
wood, particleboard, petroleum-based products and other
commodities, such as fuel and energy, has fluctuated
significantly in recent years due to changes in global supply
and demand. Our gross margins could be affected if these types
of costs continue to fluctuate. We actively manage these raw
material costs through global sourcing initiatives and price
increases on our products. However, in the short-term, rapid
increases in raw material costs can be very difficult to offset
with price increases because of contractual agreements with our
customers, and it is difficult to find effective financial
instruments to hedge against such changes.
As a result of changes in commodity costs, cost of sales
increased approximately $10 during 2011. We estimate that a 1%
increase in commodity prices, assuming no offsetting benefit of
price increases, would have decreased our operating income by
approximately $9 in 2011.
Fixed Income and
Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to fixed income and equity price risk primarily
on the cash surrender value associated with our investments in
variable life COLI policies. During 2010 and 2009, our results
of operations were significantly impacted by net returns in cash
surrender value, normal insurance expenses and any death benefit
gains (COLI income) related to our investments in
variable life COLI policies. We recognized non-taxable income of
$33.1 in 2010 and non-tax deductible losses of $41.1 in 2009
related to variable life COLI income in Operating income
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In Q1 2011, we
began considering our investments in variable life COLI policies
to be primarily a source of corporate liquidity. Accordingly, we
set the allocation of our investments in variable life COLI
policies to a more conservative profile with a heavier weighting
to fixed income securities, and we began recognizing variable
life COLI income in Investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
We estimate a 10% adverse change in the value of the equity
portion of our variable life COLI investments would have reduced
our net income by approximately $2 in 2011. We estimate that the
risk of changes in the value of the variable life COLI
investments due to other factors, including changes in interest
rates, yield curve and portfolio duration, would not have a
material impact on our results of operations or financial
condition. This quantitative measure has inherent limitations
since not all of our investments are in similar asset classes.
In addition, our investment manager actively manages certain
investments, thus our results could be better or worse than
market returns.
See Note 6 and Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
38
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data:
|
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting. This system
is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and the Board of Directors; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal
control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable
assurance and may not prevent or detect all misstatements.
Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the system of internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that
our system of internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of February 25, 2011.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered
certified public accounting firm that audited our financial
statements included in this annual report on
Form 10-K,
also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting, as stated in their report which is included
herein.
39
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
STEELCASE INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Steelcase Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
February 25, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of February 25, 2011, based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
accompanying consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 as of and
for the year ended February 25, 2011 of the Company and our
report dated April 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements and financial statement
schedule.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 25, 2011
40
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
STEELCASE INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Steelcase Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Steelcase Inc. and subsidiaries at February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010 and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
February 25, 2011, based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated April 25, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 25, 2011
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
STEELCASE INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows
of Steelcase Inc. for the year ended February 27, 2009. In
connection with our audit of the financial statements, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule for the year ended
February 27, 2009 as listed in Item 15(a). These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
February 27, 2009, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the
year ended February 27, 2009, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
BDO USA, LLP
(formerly known as BDO Seidman, LLP)
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 23, 2009
42
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
1,693.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,619.9
|
|
|
|
|
2,236.7
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
|
|
|
923.1
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
661.2
|
|
|
|
|
648.4
|
|
|
|
|
842.9
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
43
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $23.1 and $20.6
|
|
|
|
271.0
|
|
|
|
|
242.5
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
1,012.3
|
|
|
|
|
635.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1,228.1 and $1,309.9
|
|
|
|
345.8
|
|
|
|
|
415.7
|
|
Company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
|
209.6
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
132.2
|
|
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
|
183.8
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$58.7 and $56.8
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
$
|
195.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
159.2
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
|
136.3
|
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Product warranties
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
|
|
|
91.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
736.8
|
|
|
|
|
412.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
|
291.3
|
|
|
|
|
293.4
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
170.0
|
|
|
|
|
189.5
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
|
567.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
1,278.1
|
|
|
|
|
979.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock-no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock-no par value; 475,000,000 shares
authorized, 88,009,433 and 80,360,130 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
Class B Common Stock-no par value; 475,000,000 shares
authorized, 44,225,135 and 52,603,081 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
649.1
|
|
|
|
|
650.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
44
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in
millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
138,649,778
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
773.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
910.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
151.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
47,591
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(5,145,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of exercise of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock unit issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
|
(3,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units converted to common stock
|
|
|
|
127,254
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares converted to common stock, restricted stock
and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
126,036
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share, performance units and restricted stock units
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
Dividends paid ($0.53 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
133,801,321
|
|
|
|
$
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
690.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
732.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(1,060,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of exercise of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation related to IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units converted to common stock
|
|
|
|
144,595
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares converted to common stock, restricted stock
and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
33,692
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share, performance units and restricted stock units
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Dividends paid ($0.20 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
132,963,211
|
|
|
|
$
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
650.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
41,720
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(1,001,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of exercise of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation related to IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units converted to common stock
|
|
|
|
231,227
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share, performance units and restricted stock units
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
Dividends paid ($0.16 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
132,234,568
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
649.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
45
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of COLI
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Gain from IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Pension and post-retirement benefit cost
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Restructuring charges (payments), net
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Excess tax expense (benefit) from vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions, divestures, and deconsolidations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
(65.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.2
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
(28.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(50.0
|
)
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(52.5
|
)
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22.7
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(83.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
|
(335.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
Liquidations of investments
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Proceeds from IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Excess tax (expense) benefit from vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
247.4
|
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
Borrowings of lines of credit
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Repayments of lines of credit
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
(132.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(96.3
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds received
|
|
|
$
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-in value received for existing corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final progress payment towards replacement corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit towards future replacement corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from trade-in of corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
46
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Steelcase is the global leader in furnishing the work experience
in office environments. Founded in 1912, we are
headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.A. and employ
approximately 10,000 employees. We operate manufacturing
and distribution center facilities in 25 principal locations. We
distribute products through various channels, including
independent and company-owned dealers, in more than 800
locations throughout the world, and have led the global office
furniture industry in revenue every year since 1974. We operate
under North America and International reportable segments plus
an Other category. Additional information about our
reportable segments is contained in Note 18.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
|
|
Principles of
Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Steelcase Inc. and its subsidiaries. We consolidate entities in
which we maintain a controlling interest. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
We also consolidate variable interest entities
(VIEs) when appropriate. As of February 26,
2010, we consolidated a variable interest dealer because we were
considered the primary beneficiary under applicable accounting
guidance. However, we deconsolidated this dealer in 2011 under
new accounting guidance, which we adopted in Q1 2011. This
deconsolidation had no effect on net income. See Note 3 and
Note 19 for additional information.
Investments in entities where our equity ownership falls between
20% and 50%, or where we otherwise have significant influence,
are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. All
other investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for
under the cost method of accounting. These investments are
reported as Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and income from equity method
and cost method investments are reported in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Note 11 for additional information.
Our fiscal year ends on the last Friday in February with each
fiscal quarter including 13 weeks. In addition, reference
to a year relates to the fiscal year, ended in February of the
year indicated, rather than the calendar year, unless indicated
by a specific date. Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 reference
the first, second, third and fourth quarter, respectively, of
the fiscal year indicated. All amounts are in millions, except
share and per share data, data presented as a percentage or as
otherwise indicated.
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements
have been reclassified and corrected to conform to the current
year presentation. The long-term portions of the accrued
liabilities for product warranties and self-insured losses
related to workers compensation of $7.1 and $14.0,
respectively, as of February 26, 2010, previously
classified as current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets, have been reclassified to long-term liabilities. The
non-current portions of deferred income taxes related to these
liabilities of $8.1 have also been reclassified from current to
non-current deferred income taxes on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. We did not amend our 2010
Form 10-K
or any other prior period filing, as the corrections of these
amounts were not considered material to the Consolidated Balance
Sheets and they had no impact on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for any of
the periods presented.
47
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these
estimates are based on historical data and managements
knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the
future, actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
For most international operations, local currencies are
considered the functional currencies. We translate assets and
liabilities of these subsidiaries to their U.S. dollar
equivalents at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet
date. Translation adjustments are not included in determining
net income, but are recorded in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets until a sale or substantially complete liquidation of the
net investment in the international subsidiary takes place. We
translate Consolidated Statements of Operations accounts at
average exchange rates for the period.
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, net of
derivatives, arising primarily from changes in exchange rates on
foreign currency denominated intercompany working capital loans
and other intercompany transactions and balances between foreign
locations, are recorded in Other income (expense), net.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
Cash and cash equivalents include demand bank deposits and
highly liquid investment securities with an original maturity of
three months or less. Cash equivalents are reported at cost and
approximate fair value. Outstanding checks in excess of funds on
deposit are classified as Accounts payable on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
Allowances for
Credit Losses
|
Allowances for credit losses related to accounts receivable and
notes receivable are maintained at a level considered by
management to be adequate to absorb an estimate of probable
future losses existing at the balance sheet date. In estimating
probable losses, we review accounts that are past due or in
bankruptcy. We consider an accounts receivable or notes
receivable balance past due when payment is not received within
the stated terms. We review accounts that may have higher credit
risk using information available about the customer or dealer,
such as financial statements, news reports and published credit
ratings. We also use general information regarding industry
trends, the economic environment and information gathered
through our network of field-based employees. Using an estimate
of current fair market value of any applicable collateral and
other credit enhancements, such as third party guarantees, we
arrive at an estimated loss for specific concerns and estimate
an additional amount for the remainder of trade balances based
on historical trends and other factors previously referenced.
Receivable balances are written off when we determine the
balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to bad debt expense when received.
|
|
|
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
|
Our trade receivables are primarily due from independent dealers
who, in turn, carry receivables from their customers. We monitor
and manage the credit risk associated with individual dealers
and direct customers where applicable. Dealers are responsible
for assessing and assuming credit risk of
48
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
their customers and may require their customers to provide
deposits, letters of credit or other credit enhancement
measures. Some sales contracts are structured such that the
customer payment or obligation is direct to us. In those cases,
we may assume the credit risk. Whether from dealers or
customers, our trade credit exposures are not concentrated with
any particular entity.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The North
America segment primarily uses the last in, first out
(LIFO) method to value its inventories. The
International segment values inventories primarily using the
first in, first out method. Businesses within the Other category
primarily use the first in, first out or the average cost
inventory valuation methods. See Note 7 for additional
information.
|
|
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment, including some
internally-developed internal use software, are stated at cost.
Major improvements that materially extend the useful lives of
the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is
provided using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment are
tested for impairment when conditions indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. We evaluate several conditions,
including, but not limited to, the following: a significant
decrease in the market price of an asset or an asset group; a
significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a
long-lived asset is being used, including an extended period of
idleness; and a current expectation that, more likely than not,
a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise
disposed of significantly before the end of its previously
estimated useful life. We review the carrying value of our
long-lived assets held and used using estimates of future
undiscounted cash flows. If the carrying value of a long-lived
asset is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded
for the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its fair value.
When assets are classified as held for sale, losses
are recorded for the difference between the carrying amount of
the property, plant and equipment and the estimated fair value
less estimated selling costs. Property, plant and equipment are
considered held for sale when it is expected that
the asset is going to be sold within twelve months. See
Note 8 for additional information.
Rent expense under operating leases is recorded on a
straight-line basis over the lease term unless the lease
contains an escalation clause which is not fixed and
determinable. The lease term begins when we have the right to
control the use of the leased property, which is typically
before rent payments are due under the terms of the lease. If a
lease has a fixed and determinable escalation clause, the
difference between rent expense and rent paid is recorded as
deferred rent. Rent expense under operating leases that do not
have an escalation clause or where escalation is based on an
inflation index is expensed over the lease term as it is
payable. See Note 17 for additional information.
|
|
|
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price
and the related underlying tangible and identifiable intangible
net asset values resulting from business acquisitions. Annually
in Q4, or earlier if conditions indicate it is necessary, the
carrying value of the reporting unit is compared to an estimate
of its fair value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the carrying value, goodwill is impaired and
is written down to its estimated fair value. Goodwill is
assigned to and the fair value is
49
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
tested at the reporting unit level. We evaluate goodwill and
intangible assets using six reporting units where goodwill is
recordedspecifically North America; Europe and Asia
Pacific within the International segment; and Coalesse,
Designtex and PolyVision within the Other category. See
Note 10 for additional information.
Other intangible assets subject to amortization consist
primarily of proprietary technology, trademarks and non-compete
agreements and are amortized over their estimated useful
economic lives using the straight-line method. Other intangible
assets not subject to amortization, consisting of certain
trademarks, are accounted for and evaluated for potential
impairment in a manner consistent with goodwill. See
Note 10 for additional information.
Loss contingencies are accrued if the loss is probable and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs
associated with potential loss contingencies are expensed as
incurred. We are involved in litigation from time to time in the
ordinary course of our business. Based on known information, we
do not believe we are party to any lawsuit or proceeding that is
likely to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
We are self-insured for certain losses relating to domestic
workers compensation, product liability, and employee
medical, dental, and short-term disability claims. We purchase
insurance coverage to reduce our exposure to significant levels
of these claims. Self-insured losses are accrued based upon
estimates of the aggregate liability for uninsured claims
incurred as of the balance sheet date using current and
historical claims experience and certain actuarial assumptions.
These estimates are subject to uncertainty due to a variety of
factors, including extended lag times in the reporting and
resolution of claims, and trends or changes in claim settlement
patterns, insurance industry practices and legal
interpretations. As a result, actual costs could differ
significantly from the estimated amounts. Adjustments to
estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the
change in estimate occurs.
Our total reserve for estimated domestic workers
compensation claim costs incurred as of February 25, 2011
and February 26, 2010 was $16.8 and $20.0, respectively.
Our reserve for estimated domestic workers compensation
claims expected to be paid within one year as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 was $5.2 and
$6.0, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses:
Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, while our reserve
for estimated domestic workers compensation claims
expected to be paid beyond one year is included in Other
long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During Q2 2011, we recognized a change in estimate, decreasing
the reserve for estimated domestic workers compensation
claim costs by $3.7. The change in estimate was mainly due to
the continuation of favorable trends in past experience.
Our reserve for estimated product liability claim costs incurred
as of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 was $5.3
and $7.1, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses:
Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During Q2 2011, we
recognized a change in estimate, decreasing the reserve for
estimated product liability claim costs by $3.0. The change in
estimate was due to the continuation of favorable trends in past
experience.
The estimate for employee medical, dental, and short-term
disability claims incurred as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010 was $4.1 and $2.8, respectively, and is
recorded within Accrued expenses: Other on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
50
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
We offer warranties ranging from 8 years to lifetime for
most products, subject to certain exceptions. These warranties
provide for the free repair or replacement of any covered
product, part or component that fails during normal use because
of a defect in materials or workmanship. The accrued liability
for product warranties is based on an estimated amount needed to
cover product warranty costs, including product recall and
retrofit costs incurred as of the balance sheet date determined
by historical claims experience and our knowledge of current
events and actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Roll-Forward of Accrued
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Liability for Product Warranties
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
Accruals related to product warranties, recalls and retrofits
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
Adjustments related to changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for settlements
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period
|
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q2 2011, we increased the estimate of our general reserve for
warranty claims by $6.0. The increase in our general warranty
reserve was linked to implementation of new software supporting
our claims management processes, which allowed us to more deeply
understand our historical experience as a foundation for
estimating future claims. In addition, during Q2 2011, we
recorded a specific product warranty charge of $4.7 for
estimated expenses related to a retrofit project. Our reserve
for estimated settlements expected to be paid beyond one year as
of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 was $14.0
and $7.1, respectively, and is included in Other long-term
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
We sponsor a number of domestic and foreign plans to provide
pension benefits and medical and life insurance benefits to
retired employees. We measure the net over-funded or
under-funded positions of our defined benefit pension plans and
post-retirement benefit plans as of the fiscal year end and
display that position as an asset or liability on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any unrecognized prior service
cost, experience gains/losses or transition obligation is
reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss), net of tax, in shareholders equity. See
Note 5 and Note 13 for additional information.
Environmental expenditures related to current operations are
expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures related to
an existing condition allegedly caused by past operations, and
not associated with current or future revenue generation, are
expensed. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with
completion of a feasibility study or our commitment to a formal
plan of action. Liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted
basis unless site-specific plans indicate the amount and timing
of cash payments are fixed or reliably determinable. We have
ongoing monitoring and identification processes to assess how
the activities, with respect to the known exposures, are
progressing against the accrued cost estimates, as well as to
identify other potential remediation sites that are presently
unknown. The liability for environmental contingencies included
in Accrued expenses: Other on the Consolidated
51
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Balance Sheets was $2.2 as of February 27, 2011 and $3.6 as
of February 26, 2010. Our undiscounted liabilities were
$3.4 as of February 25, 2011 and $5.0 as of
February 26, 2010. Based on our ongoing evaluation of these
matters, we believe we have accrued sufficient reserves to
absorb the costs of all known environmental assessments and the
remediation costs of all known sites.
|
|
|
Asset
Retirement Obligations
|
We record all known asset retirement obligations for which the
liabilitys fair value can be reasonably estimated. We also
have known conditional asset retirement obligations that are not
reasonably estimable due to insufficient information about the
timing and method of settlement of the obligation. Accordingly,
these obligations have not been recorded in the consolidated
financial statements. A liability for these obligations will be
recorded in the period when sufficient information regarding
timing and method of settlement becomes available to make a
reasonable estimate of the liabilitys fair value. In
addition, there may be conditional asset retirement obligations
we have not yet discovered, and therefore, these obligations
also have not been included in the consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue consists substantially of product sales and related
service revenue. Product sales are reported net of discounts and
estimated returns and allowances and are recognized when title
and risks associated with ownership have passed to the dealer or
customer. Typically, this is when product is shipped to the
dealer. When product is shipped directly to an end customer,
revenue is typically recognized upon delivery or upon acceptance
by the end customer. Revenue from services is recognized when
the services have been rendered. Total revenue does not include
sales tax, as we consider ourselves a pass-through entity for
collecting and remitting sales taxes.
Cost of sales includes material, labor and overhead. Included
within these categories are such items as compensation expense,
depreciation, facilities expense, inbound freight charges,
warehousing costs, shipping and handling expenses, internal
transfer costs and other costs of our distribution network.
Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative
expenses not directly related to the manufacturing of our
products. Included in these expenses are items such as
compensation expense, depreciation, facilities expense, rental
expense, royalty expense, information technology services, legal
services and travel and entertainment expense.
|
|
|
Research and
Development Expenses
|
Research and development expenses, which are expensed as
incurred, were $32.0 for 2011, $33.0 for 2010 and $50.0 for
2009. We invest approximately one to two percent of our revenue
in research, design and development each year. Royalties are
sometimes paid to external designers of our products as the
products are sold. These costs are not included in the research
and development expenses.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the consolidated financial statements
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. These deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which
52
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect of
a change in tax rates on deferred income tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
We have net operating loss carryforwards available in certain
jurisdictions to reduce future taxable income. Future tax
benefits associated with net operating loss carryforwards are
recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is
considered more likely than not. This determination is based on
the expectation that related operations will be sufficiently
profitable or various tax, business and other planning
strategies will enable us to utilize the net operating loss
carryforwards. In making this determination we consider all
available positive and negative evidence. To the extent that
available evidence raises doubt about the realization of a
deferred income tax asset, a valuation allowance is established.
We recognize the tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only
if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits from
uncertain tax positions recognized are reflected at the amounts
most likely to be sustained on examination. See Note 15 for
additional information.
Our stock-based compensation consists of restricted stock,
restricted stock units, performance shares and performance
units. Our policy is to expense stock-based compensation using
the fair-value based method of accounting for all awards
granted, modified or settled.
Restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and
performance units are credited to equity as they are expensed
over the requisite service periods based on the grant-date fair
value of the shares expected to be issued. See Note 16 for
additional information.
The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, consisting of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable,
accounts and notes payable and certain other liabilities,
approximate their fair value due to their relatively short
maturities. Our short-term investments, foreign exchange forward
contracts and long-term investments are measured at fair value
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our total debt is carried at
cost and was $546.8 and $300.8 as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010, respectively. The fair value of our
total debt is measured using a discounted cash flow analysis
based on current market interest rates for similar types of
instruments and was approximately $555 and $309 as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, respectively.
See Note 6 and Note 12 for additional information.
We periodically use derivative financial instruments to manage
exposures to movements in interest rates and foreign exchange
rates. The use of these financial instruments modifies the
exposure of these risks with the intention to reduce our risk of
short-term volatility. We do not use derivatives for speculative
or trading purposes.
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange Forward Contracts
|
A portion of our revenue and earnings is exposed to changes in
foreign exchange rates. We seek to manage our foreign exchange
risk largely through operational means, including matching same
currency revenue with same currency costs and same currency
assets with same currency liabilities. Foreign exchange risk is
also managed through the use of derivative instruments. Foreign
exchange forward contracts serve to mitigate the risk of
translation of certain foreign denominated net income, assets
and liabilities. We primarily use derivatives for intercompany
working capital loans and certain forecasted transactions. The
foreign exchange forward contracts relate principally to the
euro, pound sterling,
53
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Canadian dollar and Mexican peso and have maturity dates less
than one year. See Note 6 for additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net fair value of derivative instruments (1)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The notional amounts of the outstanding foreign exchange forward
contracts were $147.4 as of February 25, 2011 and $160.6 as
of February 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Consolidated Statements of
Operations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gains (losses)
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
|
In Q4 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued updated guidance to add new
requirements regarding fair value disclosures about transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to
Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs
and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. We adopted
the new guidance in Q1 2011. See Note 6 for additional
information.
|
|
|
Variable
Interest Entities
|
In Q2 2010, the FASB issued a new accounting statement which
changed the consolidation guidance for VIEs. This statement
requires companies to qualitatively assess the determination of
the primary beneficiary of a VIE based on whether the
beneficiary (1) has the power to direct matters that most
significantly impact the activities of the VIE and (2) has
the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits
of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We
adopted the new guidance in Q1 2011. Based on this statement, we
deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in Q1 2011 which had
no effect on net income. See Note 19 for additional
information on the impact to our consolidated financial
statements.
In Q2 2011, the FASB issued new guidance expanding disclosures
about the credit quality of financing receivables and the
allowance for credit losses. Financing receivables include loans
and notes receivable, long-term trade accounts receivable and
certain other contractual rights to receive money on demand or
on fixed or determinable dates. Trade accounts receivable with
contractual maturities of
54
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
one year or less that arose from the sales of goods or
services are excluded from the new guidance. The new guidance
requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature of credit
risk inherent in an entitys portfolio of financing
receivables, how that risk is analyzed and the changes and
reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. We
adopted the new guidance in Q4 2011, and it did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Earnings per share is computed using the two-class method. The
two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of
common stock and participating securities according to dividends
or dividend equivalents and their respective participation
rights in undistributed earnings. Participating securities
include performance units and restricted stock units in which
the participants have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents during the performance period. Basic
earnings per share of participating securities is the same as
basic earnings per share of common shares for all periods
presented. Diluted earnings per share includes the effects of
options and certain performance shares and performance units in
which the participants have forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents during the performance period. However,
diluted earnings per share does not reflect the effects of
options, performance shares and certain performance units of
3.3 million for 2011, 3.7 million for 2010 and
4.2 million for 2009 because their effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per
share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
134.4
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock-based compensation (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding for diluted net
earnings per share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
134.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and all changes
to shareholders equity except those due to investments by,
and distributions to, shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
(40.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|