e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-31940
F.N.B. CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
25-1255406 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One F.N.B. Boulevard, Hermitage, PA
|
|
16148 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 724-981-6000
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ | |
Accelerated Filer o | |
Non-accelerated Filer o | |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
114,641,514 Shares |
F.N.B. CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2010
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
2 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income |
|
|
3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity |
|
|
5 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
6 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
62 |
|
1
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollars in thousands, except par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
142,615 |
|
|
$ |
160,845 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
164,406 |
|
|
|
149,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
307,021 |
|
|
|
310,550 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
738,828 |
|
|
|
715,349 |
|
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $904,589 and $796,537) |
|
|
869,765 |
|
|
|
775,281 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
16,729 |
|
|
|
12,754 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income of $40,343 and $38,173 |
|
|
6,004,577 |
|
|
|
5,849,361 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(116,627 |
) |
|
|
(104,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
5,887,950 |
|
|
|
5,744,706 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
114,320 |
|
|
|
117,921 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
528,720 |
|
|
|
528,710 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets, net |
|
|
34,100 |
|
|
|
39,141 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
207,402 |
|
|
|
205,447 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
288,208 |
|
|
|
259,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
8,993,043 |
|
|
$ |
8,709,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
1,103,393 |
|
|
$ |
992,298 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
3,307,698 |
|
|
|
3,182,909 |
|
Certificates and other time deposits |
|
|
2,186,737 |
|
|
|
2,205,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
6,597,828 |
|
|
|
6,380,223 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
105,326 |
|
|
|
86,797 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
817,582 |
|
|
|
669,167 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
203,257 |
|
|
|
324,877 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
204,204 |
|
|
|
204,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
7,928,197 |
|
|
|
7,665,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 500,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 114,784,268 and 114,214,951 shares |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,092,828 |
|
|
|
1,087,369 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
(3,126 |
) |
|
|
(12,833 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(23,481 |
) |
|
|
(30,633 |
) |
Treasury stock 151,418 and 103,256 shares at cost |
|
|
(2,517 |
) |
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,064,846 |
|
|
|
1,043,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
8,993,043 |
|
|
$ |
8,709,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
81,507 |
|
|
$ |
81,957 |
|
|
$ |
241,885 |
|
|
$ |
247,871 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
12,765 |
|
|
|
33,100 |
|
|
|
38,342 |
|
Nontaxable |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
5,264 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Other |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income |
|
|
93,947 |
|
|
|
96,750 |
|
|
|
280,854 |
|
|
|
292,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
15,742 |
|
|
|
20,290 |
|
|
|
50,072 |
|
|
|
67,062 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
6,369 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
6,462 |
|
|
|
13,622 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
5,984 |
|
|
|
7,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense |
|
|
21,688 |
|
|
|
28,989 |
|
|
|
68,709 |
|
|
|
94,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
72,259 |
|
|
|
67,761 |
|
|
|
212,145 |
|
|
|
197,347 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
12,313 |
|
|
|
16,455 |
|
|
|
36,516 |
|
|
|
40,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses |
|
|
59,946 |
|
|
|
51,306 |
|
|
|
175,629 |
|
|
|
156,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,234 |
) |
|
|
(9,539 |
) |
|
|
(15,866 |
) |
Non-credit related losses on securities not expected to
be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
7,251 |
|
|
|
11,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
|
|
(2,288 |
) |
|
|
(4,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges |
|
|
14,250 |
|
|
|
14,760 |
|
|
|
42,634 |
|
|
|
42,955 |
|
Insurance commissions and fees |
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
12,878 |
|
Securities commissions and fees |
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
9,430 |
|
|
|
8,786 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Gain on sale of residential mortgage loans |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
10,864 |
|
|
|
7,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income |
|
|
27,754 |
|
|
|
23,745 |
|
|
|
86,472 |
|
|
|
80,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
33,831 |
|
|
|
31,377 |
|
|
|
100,348 |
|
|
|
95,096 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
4,781 |
|
|
|
4,741 |
|
|
|
15,159 |
|
|
|
15,518 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
13,288 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
5,360 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
5,737 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
17,144 |
|
|
|
17,638 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
7,890 |
|
|
|
11,201 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
11,522 |
|
|
|
33,567 |
|
|
|
31,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
64,247 |
|
|
|
62,321 |
|
|
|
192,774 |
|
|
|
189,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
23,453 |
|
|
|
12,730 |
|
|
|
69,327 |
|
|
|
47,113 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,236 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
18,208 |
|
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
17,217 |
|
|
|
10,306 |
|
|
|
51,119 |
|
|
|
36,555 |
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
17,217 |
|
|
$ |
4,810 |
|
|
$ |
51,119 |
|
|
$ |
28,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(continued)
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net Income per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends per Common Share |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
1,087,369 |
|
|
$ |
(12,833 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,633 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,739 |
) |
|
$ |
1,043,302 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,119 |
|
Change in other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
58,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends ($0.36/share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,412 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(778 |
) |
|
|
2,830 |
|
Restricted stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
Tax expense of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
1,092,828 |
|
|
$ |
(3,126 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,481 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
$ |
1,064,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
953,200 |
|
|
$ |
(1,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(462 |
) |
|
$ |
925,984 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,555 |
|
Change in other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
(3,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
33,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends ($0.36/share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,312 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends and amortization of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,748 |
|
Redemption of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
126,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
125,877 |
|
Restricted stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
Tax expense of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Cumulative
effect of applying FSP 115-2 and 124-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,086,378 |
|
|
$ |
(3,645 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,752 |
) |
|
$ |
1,052,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Dollars in thousands
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51,119 |
|
|
$ |
36,555 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
21,558 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
36,516 |
|
|
|
40,878 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(3,137 |
) |
|
|
(19,388 |
) |
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
(2,517 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
|
|
2,288 |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
Tax expense of stock-based compensation |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
(2,741 |
) |
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
(8,355 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(2,289 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
30,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
112,503 |
|
|
|
104,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in loans |
|
|
(204,584 |
) |
|
|
(72,289 |
) |
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(335,865 |
) |
|
|
(449,945 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
59,459 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
Maturities |
|
|
259,191 |
|
|
|
235,469 |
|
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(278,089 |
) |
|
|
(155,467 |
) |
Maturities |
|
|
181,662 |
|
|
|
194,762 |
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Withdrawal/surrender of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
Increase in premises and equipment |
|
|
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
(5,758 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(323,198 |
) |
|
|
(238,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits, savings and NOW accounts |
|
|
235,883 |
|
|
|
309,293 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
(18,278 |
) |
|
|
(105,133 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
148,415 |
|
|
|
10,144 |
|
Increase in long-term debt |
|
|
108,871 |
|
|
|
26,502 |
|
Decrease in long-term debt |
|
|
(230,492 |
) |
|
|
(137,495 |
) |
Decrease in junior subordinated debt |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(506 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,748 |
|
Redemption of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
127,566 |
|
Tax expense of stock-based compensation |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(41,412 |
) |
|
|
(38,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
207,166 |
|
|
|
191,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
56,611 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
310,550 |
|
|
|
172,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
307,021 |
|
|
$ |
228,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2010
BUSINESS
F.N.B. Corporation (the Corporation) is a diversified financial services company headquartered
in Hermitage, Pennsylvania. Its primary businesses include community banking, consumer finance,
wealth management and insurance. The Corporation also conducts leasing and merchant banking
activities. The Corporation operates its community banking business through a full service branch
network in Pennsylvania and Ohio. The Corporation operates its wealth management and insurance
businesses within the existing branch network. It also conducts selected consumer finance business
in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Corporations accompanying consolidated financial statements and these notes to the
financial statements include subsidiaries in which the Corporation has a controlling financial
interest. The Corporation owns and operates First National Bank of Pennsylvania (FNBPA), First
National Trust Company, First National Investment Services Company, LLC, F.N.B. Investment
Advisors, Inc., First National Insurance Agency, LLC, Regency Finance Company (Regency), F.N.B.
Capital Corporation, LLC and Bank Capital Services, LLC, and includes results for each of these
entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments that are necessary,
in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect the Corporations financial position and results of
operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Events
occurring subsequent to the date of the balance sheet have been evaluated for potential recognition
or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements through the date of the filing of the
consolidated financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have
been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The interim operating
results are not necessarily indicative of operating results the Corporation expects for the full
year. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporations Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2010.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation conform with GAAP. The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Material
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes include the allowance for loan
losses, securities valuations, goodwill and other intangible assets and income taxes.
CAPITAL
On January 9, 2009, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (UST) Capital
Purchase Program (CPP), the Corporation issued to the UST 100,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (Series C Preferred Stock) and a warrant to purchase up to
1,302,083 shares of the Corporations common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000.
The warrant has a ten-year term and an exercise price of $11.52 per share.
On June 16, 2009, the Corporation completed a public offering of 24,150,000 shares of common
stock at a price of $5.50 per share. The net proceeds of the offering after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses were $125,784. As a result of the completion of
the public stock offering, the number of shares of the Corporations common stock purchasable upon
exercise of the warrant issued to the UST was reduced in half to 651,042 shares and the exercise
price was unchanged.
7
On September 9, 2009, the Corporation utilized a portion of the proceeds of its public
offering to redeem all of the Series C Preferred Stock issued to the UST under the CPP and to pay
the related final accrued dividend. Since receiving the CPP funds on January 9, 2009, the
Corporation paid the UST $3,333 in cash dividends. Upon redemption, the remaining difference of
$4,319 between the Series C Preferred Stock redemption amount and the recorded amount of discount
amortization was charged to retained earnings as non-cash deemed preferred stock dividends. The
non-cash deemed preferred stock dividends had no impact on total equity, but reduced earnings per
diluted common share by $0.04.
The remaining offering proceeds were used for general corporate purposes and to enhance
capital levels.
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Pending Acquisition
On August 9, 2010, the Corporation announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement to
acquire Comm Bancorp, Inc. (CBI), a bank holding company with approximately $641,765 in assets
based in Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania. The transaction is valued at approximately $67,727. Under
the terms of the merger agreement, CBI shareholders will be entitled to receive 3.4545 shares of
F.N.B. Corporation common stock and $10.00 in cash for each share of CBI common stock. The
transaction is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2010, pending regulatory
approvals, the approval of shareholders of CBI and the satisfaction of other closing conditions.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the
Allowance for Credit Losses, to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about
credit quality of financing receivables and allowance for credit losses. This update requires
additional disclosures as of the end of a reporting period and additional disclosures about
activity that occurs during a reporting period that will assist financial statement users in
assessing credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.
The additional disclosures are required to be provided on a disaggregated basis. ASU No.
2010-20 defines two levels of disaggregation and provides additional implementation guidance to
determine the appropriate level of disaggregation of information. The disclosures should
facilitate evaluation of the nature of the credit risk inherent in a portfolio of financing
receivables, how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses,
and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses.
The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs
during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not anticipated to have a material
effect on the financial statements, results of operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
Modification of a Loan That is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is
Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset. ASU No. 2010-18 provides that
modifications of acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality that are accounted for within a
pool do not result in removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans
would otherwise be considered a troubled asset restructuring. ASU No. 2010-18 is effective for
modifications occurring in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after July 15,
2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the financial statements,
results of operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
Fair Value Disclosures
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements. The ASU clarifies existing disclosure requirements and requires additional
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. This standard clarifies that an entity should
provide fair value disclosures by class rather than major
8
category of assets and liabilities, resulting in a greater level of disaggregated information
presented in all fair value disclosures. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies that, for fair value
measurements using significant other observable inputs (Level 2) and significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3), an entity is required to describe valuation techniques and the inputs used in
determining the fair values of each class of assets and liabilities and to disclose a change in
valuation technique and the reason for making that change. Additionally, the ASU requires an
entity to discuss the reasons for transfers in or out of Level 3 and, if significant, to disclose
these transfers on a gross basis, to disclose on a gross basis the amounts and reasons for
significant transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and to disclose its
policy for determining when transfers between Levels are recognized. This standard is effective
for interim and annual reporting periods that begin after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material effect on the financial statements, results of operations or
liquidity of the Corporation.
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amends current GAAP related to the
accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities,
including the removal of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from GAAP. This
accounting standard also clarifies that a transferor must evaluate whether it has maintained
effective control of a financial asset by considering its continuing involvement with the
transferred financial asset. This accounting standard is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which requires a qualitative rather than
a quantitative analysis to establish the primary beneficiary for determining whether the
consolidation of a variable interest entity (VIE) is required. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is
the enterprise that has: (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly
impact its economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. This accounting standard is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the
Corporation.
SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities are as follows:
Securities Available For Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
281,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,939 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
215,623 |
|
|
|
6,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,051 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
151,042 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,385 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
58,904 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
61,185 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
19,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,125 |
) |
|
|
5,163 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
12,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
739,772 |
|
|
|
13,005 |
|
|
|
(15,978 |
) |
|
|
736,799 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
741,690 |
|
|
$ |
13,225 |
|
|
$ |
(16,087 |
) |
|
$ |
738,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
251,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
252,456 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
319,902 |
|
|
|
6,035 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
325,771 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
43,985 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
43,508 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
74,177 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
75,583 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
21,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,766 |
) |
|
|
4,824 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
12,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
723,892 |
|
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
(20,422 |
) |
|
|
712,617 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
726,548 |
|
|
$ |
9,371 |
|
|
$ |
(20,570 |
) |
|
$ |
715,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held To Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
4,981 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,246 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
655,652 |
|
|
|
29,518 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
685,132 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
45,390 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,112 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
38,275 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
37,827 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
120,413 |
|
|
|
5,637 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
125,912 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
2,752 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
869,765 |
|
|
$ |
36,642 |
|
|
$ |
(1,818 |
) |
|
$ |
904,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
5,386 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,467 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
566,876 |
|
|
|
23,141 |
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
589,756 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
27,263 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,669 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,245 |
) |
|
|
45,755 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
121,548 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
123,626 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
2,778 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
775,281 |
|
|
$ |
26,116 |
|
|
$ |
(4,860 |
) |
|
$ |
796,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation classifies securities as trading securities when management intends to sell
such securities in the near term. Such securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains
(losses) reflected through the consolidated statement of income. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the Corporation did not hold any trading securities.
The Corporation recognized a gain of $2,291 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
relating to the sale of a $6,016 U.S. government agency security and $52,625 of mortgage backed
securities. These securities were sold to better position the balance sheet for the remainder of
2010. Additionally, the Corporation recognized a gain of $226 for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 relating to other securities sold during that period. The Corporation recognized a gain
of $206 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 relating to the acquisition by a third party
of a company in which the Corporation owned stock. Additionally, the Corporation recognized a gain
of $292 for the nine
10
months ended September 30, 2009 relating to securities sold and called during
that period. No security sales were at a loss.
Gross gains and gross losses were realized on sales of securities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross gains |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
2,517 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
2,517 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, the amortized cost and fair value of securities, by contractual
maturities, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
12,880 |
|
|
$ |
12,900 |
|
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
|
$ |
6,477 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
267,218 |
|
|
|
269,199 |
|
|
|
23,776 |
|
|
|
24,902 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
17,178 |
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
|
16,405 |
|
|
|
17,270 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
75,792 |
|
|
|
61,502 |
|
|
|
83,829 |
|
|
|
86,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,068 |
|
|
|
361,323 |
|
|
|
130,448 |
|
|
|
135,518 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
215,623 |
|
|
|
222,051 |
|
|
|
655,652 |
|
|
|
685,132 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
151,042 |
|
|
|
153,385 |
|
|
|
45,390 |
|
|
|
46,112 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
38,275 |
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
741,690 |
|
|
$ |
738,828 |
|
|
$ |
869,765 |
|
|
$ |
904,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities may differ from contractual terms because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without penalties. Periodic payments are received on mortgage-backed
securities based on the payment patterns of the underlying collateral.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, securities with a carrying value of $746,674 and
$598,078, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, trust deposits and for other
purposes as required by law. Securities with a carrying value of $763,352 and $616,000 at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were pledged as collateral for short-term
borrowings.
Following are summaries of the fair values and unrealized losses of securities, segregated by
length of impairment:
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
(14,125 |
) |
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
(14,125 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
7,080 |
|
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,695 |
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
12,986 |
|
|
$ |
(16,050 |
) |
|
$ |
18,681 |
|
|
$ |
(16,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
46,501 |
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,501 |
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
68,313 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,313 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
29,516 |
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,516 |
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
12,357 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,357 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
(12,023 |
) |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
(4,743 |
) |
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
(16,766 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
161,276 |
|
|
$ |
(13,209 |
) |
|
$ |
12,220 |
|
|
$ |
(7,361 |
) |
|
$ |
173,496 |
|
|
$ |
(20,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
15,440 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,440 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,736 |
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
11,736 |
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
6,093 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,082 |
|
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
$ |
18,261 |
|
|
$ |
(1,727 |
) |
|
$ |
37,343 |
|
|
$ |
(1,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
20,650 |
|
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,650 |
|
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
15,534 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
30,221 |
|
|
|
(3,165 |
) |
|
|
45,755 |
|
|
|
(3,245 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
13,055 |
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
15,023 |
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,239 |
|
|
$ |
(703 |
) |
|
$ |
36,159 |
|
|
$ |
(4,157 |
) |
|
$ |
85,398 |
|
|
$ |
(4,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, securities with unrealized losses for less than 12 months
include 1 investment in a residential mortgage-backed security, 5 investments in states of the U.S.
and political subdivision securities, 1 investment in an other debt security and 2 investments in
equity securities. Securities with unrealized losses of greater than 12 months include 2
investments in residential mortgage-backed securities (non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs)),1 investment in states of the U.S. and political subdivisions, 13 investments
in collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), 6 investments in other debt securities and 4 investments
in equity securities. The unrealized losses relating to the residential mortgage-backed securities
and states of the U.S. and political subdivisions are considered temporary resulting primarily from
changes in interest rates.
The Corporations unrealized losses on CDOs primarily relate to investments in trust preferred
securities (TPS). The Corporations portfolio of TPS consists of single-issuer and pooled
securities. The single-issuer securities are primarily from money-center and large regional banks.
The pooled securities consist of securities issued primarily by banks, with some of the pools
including a limited number of insurance companies. The non-credit portion of unrealized losses on
investments in TPS is attributable to temporary illiquidity and the uncertainty affecting these
markets, as well as changes in interest rates.
12
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
The Corporation evaluates its investment securities portfolio for other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) on a quarterly basis. Impairment is assessed at the individual security level.
The Corporation considers an investment security impaired if the fair value of the security is less
than its cost or amortized cost basis.
When impairment of an equity security is considered to be other-than-temporary, the security
is written down to its fair value and an impairment loss is recorded as a loss within non-interest
income in the consolidated statement of income. When impairment of a debt security is considered
to be other-than-temporary, the amount of the OTTI recorded as a loss within non-interest income
and thereby recognized in earnings depends on whether the Corporation intends to sell the security
or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis.
If the Corporation intends to sell the debt security or if it is more likely than not that the
Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, OTTI
shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized
cost basis and its fair value.
If the Corporation does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than
not the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost
basis, OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing credit loss and the amount related to
all other market factors. The amount related to credit loss shall be recognized in earnings. The
amount related to other market factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of
applicable taxes.
The Corporation performs its OTTI evaluation process in a consistent and systematic manner and
includes an evaluation of all available evidence. Documentation of the process is as extensive as
necessary to support a conclusion as to whether a decline in fair value below cost or amortized
cost is other-than-temporary and includes documentation supporting both observable and unobservable
inputs and a rationale for the conclusions reached. In making these determinations for pooled TPS,
the Corporation consults with third-party advisory firms to provide additional valuation
assistance.
This process considers factors such as the severity, length of time and anticipated recovery
period of the impairment, recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance
sheet date, recent events specific to the issuer, including investment downgrades by rating
agencies and economic conditions of its industry, and the issuers financial condition, repayment
capacity, capital strength and near-term prospects.
For debt securities, the Corporation also considers the payment structure of the debt
security, the likelihood of the issuer being able to make future payments, failure of the issuer of
the security to make scheduled interest and principal payments, whether the Corporation has made a
decision to sell the security and whether the Corporations cash or working capital requirements or
contractual or regulatory obligations indicate that the debt security will be required to be sold
before a forecasted recovery occurs. For equity securities, the Corporation also considers its
intent and ability to retain the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery
in fair value. Among the factors that are considered in determining the Corporations intent and
ability to retain the security is a review of its capital adequacy, interest rate risk position and
liquidity. The assessment of a securitys ability to recover any decline in fair value, the
ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, the Corporations intent and ability to
retain the security, and whether it is more likely than not the Corporation will be required to
sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis require considerable judgment.
Debt securities with credit ratings below AA at the time of purchase that are
repayment-sensitive securities are evaluated using the guidance of ASC Topic 325, Investments -
Other. All other debt securities are required to be evaluated under ASC Topic 320, Investments
Debt Securities.
The Corporation invested in TPS issued by special purpose vehicles (SPVs) which hold pools of
collateral consisting of trust preferred and subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank
holding companies and insurance companies. The securities issued by the SPVs are generally
segregated into several classes known as tranches. Typically, the structure includes senior,
mezzanine and equity tranches. The equity tranche represents the first loss position. The
Corporation generally holds interests in mezzanine tranches. Interest and principal collected from
the collateral held by the SPVs are distributed with a priority that provides the highest level of
protection to the senior-most
13
tranches. In order to provide a high level of protection to the
senior tranches, cash flows are diverted to higher-level tranches if the principal and interest
coverage tests are not met.
The Corporation prices its holdings of TPS using Level 3 inputs in accordance with ASC Topic
820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and guidance issued by the SEC. In this regard, the
Corporation evaluates current available information in estimating the future cash flows of these
securities and determines whether there have been favorable or adverse changes in estimated cash
flows from the cash flows previously projected. The Corporation considers the structure and term
of the pool and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the evaluation
incorporates factors such as over-collateralization and interest coverage tests, interest rates and
appropriate risk premiums, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments and the
allocation of payments to the various tranches. Current estimates of cash flows are based on the
most recent trustee reports, announcements of deferrals or defaults, and assumptions regarding
expected future default rates, prepayment and recovery rates and other relevant information. In
constructing these assumptions, the Corporation considers the following:
|
|
|
that current defaults would have no recovery; |
|
|
|
|
that some individually analyzed deferrals will cure at rates varying from 10% to 90%
after the deferral period ends; |
|
|
|
|
recent historical performance metrics, including profitability, capital ratios, loan
charge-offs and loan reserve ratios, for the underlying institutions that would indicate
a higher probability of default by the institution; |
|
|
|
|
that institutions identified as possessing a higher probability of default would
recover at a rate of 10% for banks and 15% for insurance companies; |
|
|
|
|
that financial performance of the financial sector continues to be affected by the
economic environment resulting in an expectation of additional deferrals and defaults in
the future; |
|
|
|
|
whether the security is currently deferring interest; and |
|
|
|
|
the external rating of the security and recent changes to its external rating. |
The primary evidence utilized by the Corporation is the level of current deferrals and
defaults, the level of excess subordination that allows for receipt of full principal and interest,
the credit rating for each security and the likelihood that future deferrals and defaults will
occur at a level that will fully erode the excess subordination based on an assessment of the
underlying collateral. The Corporation combines the results of these factors considered in
estimating the future cash flows of these securities to determine whether there has been an adverse
change in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected.
The Corporations portfolio of trust preferred CDOs consists of 13 pooled issues and seven
single issue securities. One of the pooled issues is a senior tranche; the remaining 12 are
mezzanine tranches. At September 30, 2010, the 13 pooled TPS had an estimated fair value of $7,915
while the single-issuer TPS had an estimated fair value of $12,472. The Corporation has concluded
from the analysis performed at September 30, 2010 that it is probable that the Corporation will
collect all contractual principal and interest payments on all of its single-issuer and pooled TPS
sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities.
Upon adoption of ASC Topic 320, the Corporation determined that $7,021 of OTTI charges
previously recorded were non-credit related. As such, a $4,564 (net of $2,457 of taxes) increase
to retained earnings and a corresponding decrease to accumulated other comprehensive income were
recorded as the cumulative effect of adopting ASC Topic 320 as of April 1, 2009.
The Corporation recognized net impairment losses on securities of $2,288 and $4,234 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, due to the write-down of securities
that the Corporation deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Impairment losses related to
bank stocks for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $7 and $665,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, impairment losses on pooled TPS
amounted to $9,539, which includes $7,251 ($4,713, net of tax) for non-credit related impairment
14
losses recognized directly in other comprehensive income and $2,288 of credit-related
impairment losses recognized in earnings.
The impairment losses on bank stocks relate to
securities that were in an unrealized loss position for an extended period of time or the
percentage of unrealized loss was such that management believes it would be unlikely to recover in
the near term. In accordance with GAAP, management has deemed these impairments to be
other-than-temporary given the low likelihood that they will recover in value in the foreseeable
future. At September 30, 2010, the Corporation held 14 bank stocks with an adjusted cost basis of
$1,892 and fair value of $2,002.
At September 30, 2010, all 12 of the pooled trust preferred security investments on which OTTI
has been recognized are classified as non-performing investments.
The following table presents a summary of the cumulative credit-related OTTI charges
recognized as components of earnings for securities for which a portion of an OTTI is recognized in
other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Beginning balance of the amount related to credit loss for which a
portion of OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(16,051 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Amount of OTTI related to credit loss on April 1, 2009 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,953 |
) |
Additions related to credit loss for securities with previously
recognized OTTI |
|
|
(2,235 |
) |
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
Additions related to credit loss for securities with initial OTTI |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(4,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of the amount related to credit loss for which a portion
of OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(18,332 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents the OTTI charges recorded for pooled trust preferred securities, net of the
Corporations cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of ASC Topic 320, effective April 1, 2009. |
TPS continue to experience price volatility as the secondary market for such securities
remains limited. Write-downs were based on the individual securities credit performance and its
ability to make its contractual principal and interest payments. Should credit quality deteriorate
to a greater extent than projected, it is possible that additional write-downs may be required.
The Corporation monitors actual deferrals and defaults as well as expected future deferrals and
defaults to determine if there is a high probability for expected losses and contractual shortfalls
of interest or principal, which could warrant further impairment. The Corporation evaluates its
entire portfolio each quarter to determine if additional write-downs are warranted.
15
The following table provides information relating to the Corporations TPS as of September 30,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
Actual |
|
Projected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Defaults (as |
|
Deferrals (as |
|
Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest |
|
Issuers |
|
a percent of |
|
a percent of |
|
Rates on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Credit |
|
Currently |
|
original |
|
original |
|
Current |
|
Expected |
Deal Name |
|
Class |
|
Value |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
|
Ratings |
|
Performing |
|
collateral) |
|
collateral) |
|
Deferrals (1) |
|
Defaults (2) |
Pooled TPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,266 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
$ |
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
P2 |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
4,889 |
|
|
|
2,746 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
P3 |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
4,218 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
(3,080 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
P4 |
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
2,852 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
(2,172 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
P5 |
|
MEZ |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
P6 |
|
MEZ |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
P7 |
|
|
B3 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
P8 |
|
|
B1 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
P9 |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
5,048 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
P10 (3) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
P11 |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
P12 |
|
|
A4L |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,930 |
|
|
|
19,288 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
(14,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P13 (3) |
|
SNR |
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Not OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pooled TPS |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,234 |
|
|
$ |
22,754 |
|
|
$ |
7,915 |
|
|
$ |
(14,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Issuer TPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
$ |
(536 |
) |
|
BB |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
B+ |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
B+ |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
Baa2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
BB |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
BB |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Single Issuer TPS |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,300 |
|
|
$ |
14,321 |
|
|
$ |
12,472 |
|
|
$ |
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TPS |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,534 |
|
|
$ |
37,075 |
|
|
$ |
20,387 |
|
|
$ |
(16,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Some current deferrals are projected to cure at rates varying from 10% to 90% after the
deferral period ends. |
|
(2) |
|
Expected future defaults as a percent of remaining performing collateral. Future
deferrals and defaults are generally assumed to have recovery rates of 10% for banks and 15%
for insurance companies. |
|
(3) |
|
Excess subordination represents the additional defaults in excess of both current and
projected defaults that the CDO can absorb before the bond experiences any credit
impairment. The P10 and P13 securities had excess subordination as a percent of current
collateral of 0.27% and 53.34%, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. |
16
Non-Agency CMOs
The Corporation purchased $161,151 of non-agency CMOs from 2003 through 2005. These
securities, which are classified as held to maturity, have paid down to a balance of $38,275 at
September 30, 2010, including $10,725 of paydowns during the first nine months of 2010, an
annualized payout rate of 29%. In addition, one AAA-rated holding that was performing well was
redeemed by the issuer at par during the quarter. At the time of purchase, these securities were
all rated AAA, with an original average loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of 66.1% and original credit
score of 724. At origination, the credit support, or the amount of loss the collateral pool could
absorb before the AAA securities would incur a credit loss, ranged from 1.3% to 7.0%. This credit
support has grown to a range of 4.6% to 19.3%, due to paydowns and good credit performance through
the first half of 2008. Beginning in the second half of 2008, national delinquencies, an early
warning sign of potential default, began to accelerate on the collateral pools. The rate of
delinquencies in the third quarter of 2010 was stable versus last quarter. All CMO holdings are
current with regards to principal and interest payments due.
The rating agencies monitor these non-agency CMOs and the underlying collateral performance
for delinquencies, foreclosures and defaults. They also factor in trends in bankruptcies and
housing values to ultimately arrive at an expected loss for a given item of defaulted collateral.
Based on deteriorating performance of the collateral, many of these types of securities have been
downgraded by the rating agencies. For the Corporations portfolio, four of the eleven non-agency
CMOs have been downgraded from AAA.
The Corporation determines its credit related losses by running scenario analysis on the
underlying collateral. This analysis applies default assumptions to delinquencies already in the
pipeline, projects future defaults based in part on the historical trends for the collateral,
applies a rate of severity and estimates prepayment rates. Because of the limited historical
trends for the collateral, multiple default scenarios were analyzed including scenarios that
significantly elevate defaults over the next 12 24 months. Based on the results of the analysis,
the Corporations management has concluded that there are currently no credit-related losses in its
non-agency CMO portfolio.
17
The following table provides information relating to the Corporations non-agency CMOs as of
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordination Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
|
Credit Support % |
|
|
Delinquency % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
Security |
|
Year |
|
|
Value |
|
|
S&P |
|
|
Moodys |
|
|
Original |
|
|
Current |
|
|
30 Day |
|
|
60 Day |
|
|
90 Day |
|
|
Foreclosure |
|
|
OREO |
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
|
Delinquency |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
Score |
|
1 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
4,923 |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
740 |
|
2 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
3 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
4 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
5 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
6 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
AAA |
|
Aa3 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
7 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
AA+ |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
8 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Aaa |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
9 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
AAA |
|
Aaa |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
10 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
7,589 |
|
|
CCC |
|
Caa1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
11 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
5,066 |
|
|
CCC |
|
|
B2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.5 |
% |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
The Corporation is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Pittsburgh. The FHLB
requires members to purchase and hold a specified minimum level of FHLB stock based upon their
level of borrowings, collateral balances and participation in other programs offered by the FHLB.
Stock in the FHLB is non-marketable and is redeemable at the discretion of the FHLB. Both cash and
stock dividends on FHLB stock are reported as income.
Members do not purchase stock in the FHLB for the same reasons that traditional equity
investors acquire stock in an investor-owned enterprise. Rather, members purchase stock to obtain
access to the low-cost products and services offered by the FHLB. Unlike equity securities of
traditional for-profit enterprises, the stock of FHLB does not provide its holders with an
opportunity for capital appreciation because, by regulation, FHLB stock can only be purchased,
redeemed and transferred at par value.
At both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Corporations FHLB stock totaled $27,962
and is included in other assets on the balance sheet. The Corporation accounts for the stock in
accordance with ASC Topic 325, which requires the investment to be carried at cost and evaluated
for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value.
The Corporation periodically evaluates its FHLB investment for possible impairment based on,
among other things, the capital adequacy of the FHLB and its overall financial condition. The
Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator of the FHLB, requires it to maintain a total
capital-to-assets ratio of at least 4.0%. At June 30, 2010, the FHLBs capital ratio of 7.2%
exceeded the regulatory requirement. Failure by the FHLB to meet this regulatory capital
requirement would require an in-depth analysis of other factors including:
|
|
|
the members ability to access liquidity from the FHLB; |
|
|
|
|
the members funding cost advantage with the FHLB compared to alternative sources of
funds; |
|
|
|
|
a decline in the market value of FHLBs net assets relative to book value which may
or may not affect future financial performance or cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
the FHLBs ability to obtain credit and source liquidity, for which one indicator is
the credit rating of the FHLB; |
|
|
|
|
the FHLBs commitment to make payments taking into account its ability to meet
statutory and regulatory payment obligations and the level of such payments in relation
to the FHLBs operating performance; and |
|
|
|
|
the prospects of amendments to laws that affect the rights and obligations of the
FHLB. |
At September 30, 2010, the Corporation believes its holdings in the stock are ultimately
recoverable at par value and, therefore, determined that FHLB stock was not other-than-temporarily
impaired. In addition, the Corporation has ample liquidity and does not require redemption of its
FHLB stock in the foreseeable future. On October 29, 2010 the FHLB redeemed $1,398 of stock at par
value, which reduced the Corporations holdings to $26,564.
BORROWINGS
Following is a summary of short-term borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
687,139 |
|
|
$ |
536,784 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
120,221 |
|
|
|
121,938 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
10,222 |
|
|
|
10,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
817,582 |
|
|
$ |
669,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Securities sold under repurchase agreements is comprised of treasury management accounts,
which are borrowings from commercial customers of FNBPA which are generally renewable on a daily
basis. Securities are pledged to these customers in an amount equal to the outstanding balance.
|
|
Following is a summary of long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
$ |
130,972 |
|
|
$ |
256,921 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
71,672 |
|
|
|
67,343 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
203,257 |
|
|
$ |
324,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations banking affiliate has available credit with the FHLB of $1,831,371 of which
$130,972 was used as of September 30, 2010. These advances are secured by loans collateralized by
1-4 family mortgages and FHLB stock and are scheduled to mature in various amounts periodically
through the year 2019. Effective interest rates paid on these advances range from 1.35% to 4.85%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2.28% to 5.54% for the year ended December 31,
2009. During the first nine months of 2010, the Corporation prepaid $59,000 of FHLB advances
yielding 3.93% and incurred a prepayment penalty of $2,269 that was recorded in other non-interest
expense.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT
The Corporation has four unconsolidated subsidiary trusts (collectively, the Trusts): F.N.B.
Statutory Trust I, F.N.B. Statutory Trust II, Omega Financial Capital Trust I and Sun Bancorp
Statutory Trust I. One hundred percent of the common equity of each Trust is owned by the
Corporation. The Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing Corporation-obligated mandatorily
redeemable capital securities (TPS) to third-party investors. The proceeds from the sale of TPS
and the issuance of common equity by the Trusts were invested in junior subordinated debt
securities (subordinated debt) issued by the Corporation, which are the sole assets of each Trust.
Since third-party investors are the primary beneficiaries, the Trusts are not consolidated in the
Corporations financial statements. The Trusts pay dividends on the TPS at the same rate as the
distributions paid by the Corporation on the junior subordinated debt held by the Trusts. Omega
Financial Capital Trust I and Sun Bancorp Statutory Trust I were acquired as a result of a previous
acquisition.
Distributions on the subordinated debt issued to the Trusts are recorded as interest expense
by the Corporation. The TPS are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon
repayment of the subordinated debt. The subordinated debt, net of the Corporations investment in
the Trusts, qualifies as Tier 1 capital under the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(FRB) guidelines subject to certain limitations beginning March 31, 2011. The Corporation has
entered into agreements which, when taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee the
obligations under the TPS subject to the terms of each of the guarantees.
The following table provides information relating to the Trusts as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. |
|
F.N.B. |
|
Omega |
|
Sun Bancorp |
|
|
Statutory |
|
Statutory |
|
Financial |
|
Statutory |
|
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Capital Trust I |
|
Trust I |
Trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,500 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,500 |
|
Common securities |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
22,165 |
|
|
|
35,859 |
|
|
|
17,314 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
|
3/31/33 |
|
|
|
6/15/36 |
|
|
|
10/18/34 |
|
|
|
2/22/31 |
|
Optional redemption date |
|
|
3/31/08 |
|
|
|
6/15/11 |
|
|
|
10/18/09 |
|
|
|
2/22/11 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
10.20 |
% |
|
|
variable; |
|
|
fixed until |
|
|
variable; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR plus |
|
|
6/15/11; |
|
|
LIBOR plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 basis points |
|
|
then LIBOR plus |
|
|
219 basis points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 basis points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Corporation is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations
and economic conditions. The Corporation principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of
business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Corporation
manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing
the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities. The Corporations existing
interest rate derivatives result from a service provided to certain qualifying customers. The
Corporation manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments in order to minimize
its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions.
The Corporation periodically enters into interest rate swap agreements to meet the financing,
interest rate and equity risk management needs of its commercial loan customers. These agreements
provide the customer the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. The Corporation
then enters into positions with a derivative counterparty in order to offset its exposure on the
variable and fixed components of the customer agreements. These agreements meet the definition of
derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and
Hedging. These instruments and their offsetting positions are reported at fair value in other
assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with any resulting gain or loss
recorded in current period earnings as other income.
At September 30, 2010, the Corporation was party to 121 swaps with notional amounts totaling
approximately $456,961 with customers, and 121 swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately
$456,961 with derivative counterparties. The following table presents the fair value of the
Corporations derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the balance
sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest Rate Products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
37,025 |
|
|
$ |
13,305 |
|
Liability derivatives |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
36,616 |
|
|
|
12,497 |
|
The following table presents the effect of the Corporations derivative financial instruments
on the income statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Statement |
|
September 30, |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest rate products |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
(399 |
) |
|
$ |
173 |
|
The Corporation has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a
provision where if the Corporation defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where
repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Corporation could
also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Corporation also has agreements
with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision if the Corporation fails to
maintain its status as a well capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the
derivative positions and the Corporation would be required to settle its obligations under the
agreements. Certain of the Corporations agreements with its derivative counterparties contain
provisions where if a material or adverse change occurs that materially changes the Corporations
creditworthiness in an adverse manner the Corporation may be required to fully collateralize its
obligations under the derivative instrument.
Interest rate swap agreements generally require posting of collateral by either party under
certain conditions. As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of counterparty derivatives in a net
liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for non-performance
risk related to these agreements, was $38,243. At September 30, 2010, the Corporation has posted
collateral with derivative counterparties with a fair value of $28,968, of which none is cash
collateral. Additionally, if the Corporation had breached its agreements with its derivative
counterparties it would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the
termination value and would be required to pay an additional $9,275 in excess of amounts previously
posted as collateral with the respective counterparties.
21
The Corporation has entered into interest rate lock commitments to originate residential
mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to
secondary market investors. These arrangements are considered derivative instruments. The fair
values of the Corporations rate lock commitments to customers and commitments with investors at
September 30, 2010 are not material.
COMMITMENTS, CREDIT RISK AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation has commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit that
involve certain elements of credit risk in excess of the amount stated in the consolidated balance
sheet. The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the customer
is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The credit risk associated with
loan commitments and standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in
extending loans to customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Since many of these
commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash flow requirements.
Following is a summary of off-balance sheet credit risk information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
1,495,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,411,865 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
107,198 |
|
|
|
87,917 |
|
At September 30, 2010, funding of approximately 81.0% of the commitments to extend credit was
dependent on the financial condition of the customer. The Corporation has the ability to withdraw
such commitments at its discretion. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Based on managements credit evaluation of
the customer, collateral may be deemed necessary. Collateral requirements vary and may include
accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial
properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation that may
require payment at a future date. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The obligations are not
recorded in the Corporations consolidated financial statements. The Corporations maximum
exposure to credit loss in the event the customer does not satisfy the terms of the agreement
equals the notional amount of the obligation less the value of any collateral.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending and threatened legal
proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. These actions
include claims brought against the Corporation and its subsidiaries where the Corporation or a
subsidiary acted as one or more of the following: a depository bank, lender, underwriter,
fiduciary, financial advisor, broker or was engaged in other business activities. Although the
ultimate outcome for any asserted claim cannot be predicted with certainty, the Corporation
believes that it and its subsidiaries have valid defenses for all asserted claims. Reserves are
established for legal claims when losses associated with the claims are judged to be probable and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and
established reserves, the Corporation does not anticipate, at the present time, that the aggregate
liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial position. However, the Corporation cannot determine whether
or not any claims asserted against it will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
results of operations in any future reporting period.
22
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Restricted Stock
The Corporation issues restricted stock awards, consisting of both restricted stock and
restricted stock units, to key employees under its Incentive Compensation Plans (Plans). The grant
date fair value of the restricted stock awards is equal to the price of the Corporations common
stock on the grant date. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation
issued 500,707 and 469,346 restricted stock awards with aggregate weighted average grant date fair
values of $7.77 and $5.99, respectively, under these Plans. As of September 30, 2010, the
Corporation had available up to 2,536,289 shares of common stock to issue under these Plans.
Under the Plans, more than half of the restricted stock awards granted to management are
earned if the Corporation meets or exceeds certain financial performance results when compared to
its peers. These performance-related awards are expensed ratably from the date that the likelihood
of meeting the performance measure is probable through the end of a four-year vesting period. The
service-based awards are expensed ratably over a three-year vesting period. The Corporation also
issues discretionary service-based awards to certain employees that vest over five years.
The unvested restricted stock awards are eligible to receive cash dividends or dividend
equivalents which are ultimately used to purchase additional shares of stock. Any additional
shares of stock ultimately received as a result of cash dividends are subject to forfeiture if the
requisite service period is not completed or the specified performance criteria are not met. These
awards are subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions upon retirement, death, disability or
in the event of a change of control as defined in the award agreements.
Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards was $2,059 and $1,689 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the tax benefit of which was $721 and $591,
respectively.
The following table summarizes certain information concerning restricted stock awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Awards |
|
Price |
|
Awards |
|
Price |
Unvested awards outstanding at beginning of
period |
|
|
854,440 |
|
|
$ |
10.57 |
|
|
|
527,101 |
|
|
$ |
15.34 |
|
Granted |
|
|
500,707 |
|
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
469,346 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(95,281 |
) |
|
|
15.05 |
|
|
|
(99,369 |
) |
|
|
17.59 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(32,008 |
) |
|
|
9.21 |
|
|
|
(90,705 |
) |
|
|
13.04 |
|
Dividend reinvestment |
|
|
50,208 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
33,446 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested awards outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,278,066 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
839,819 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of awards vested was $698 and $1,046 for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, there was $6,093 of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested restricted stock awards including $71 that is subject to accelerated vesting under the
Plans immediate vesting upon retirement provision for awards granted prior to the adoption of ASC
Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation, on January 1, 2006. The components of the
restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service- |
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
Based |
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Total |
Unvested awards |
|
|
483,387 |
|
|
|
794,679 |
|
|
|
1,278,066 |
|
Unrecognized compensation expense |
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
$ |
6,093 |
|
Intrinsic value |
|
$ |
4,138 |
|
|
$ |
6,802 |
|
|
$ |
10,940 |
|
Weighted average remaining life (in years) |
|
|
2.15 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
23
Stock Options
The Corporation did not grant stock options during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 or
2009. All outstanding stock options were granted at prices equal to the fair market value at the
date of the grant, are primarily exercisable within ten years from the date of the grant and were
fully vested as of January 1, 2006. The Corporation issues shares of treasury stock or authorized
but unissued shares to satisfy stock option exercises. No stock options were exercised during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. Shares issued upon the exercise of stock options were 1,624
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes certain information concerning stock option awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
Options outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
968,090 |
|
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
|
1,299,317 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
15.53 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(155,613 |
) |
|
|
11.42 |
|
|
|
(291,910 |
) |
|
|
14.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at end of period |
|
|
812,477 |
|
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
1,005,783 |
|
|
|
13.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options at September 30, 2010 was
$(4,483), since the fair value of the stock subject to the options was less than the exercise
price.
Warrants
In conjunction with its participation in the CPP, the Corporation issued to the UST a warrant
to purchase up to 1,302,083 shares of the Corporations common stock. Pursuant to Section 13(H) of
the Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of the warrant has been reduced in half to 651,042 shares as of June 16, 2009, the date the
Corporation completed a public offering. The warrant has an exercise price of $11.52 per share.
RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation sponsors the Retirement Income Plan (RIP), a qualified noncontributory defined
benefit pension plan covering substantially all salaried employees hired prior to January 1, 2008.
The RIP covers employees who satisfy minimum age and length of service requirements. During 2006,
the Corporation amended the RIP such that effective January 1, 2007, benefits are earned based on
the employees compensation each year and caused a remeasurement that produced a net unrecognized
service credit of $14,079, which is being amortized over the average period of future service of
active employees of 13.5 years. The Corporations funding guideline has been to make annual
contributions to the RIP each year, if necessary, such that minimum funding requirements have been
met. Based on the funded status of the plan, the Corporation does not expect to make a
contribution to the RIP in 2010. The Corporation amended the RIP on October 20, 2010 to be frozen
effective December 31, 2010, at which time the Corporation will take the remaining previously
unrecognized prior service credit of approximately $10,347 into income as a reduction to expense in
the fourth quarter of 2010.
The Corporation also sponsors two supplemental non-qualified retirement plans. The ERISA
Excess Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the
maximum benefit allowable under the Internal Revenue Code and the amount that would be provided
under the RIP, if no limits were applied. The Basic Retirement Plan (BRP) is applicable to certain
officers whom the Board of Directors designates. Officers participating in the BRP receive a
benefit based on a target benefit percentage based on years of service at retirement and a
designated tier as determined by the Board of Directors. When a participant retires, the basic
benefit under the BRP is a monthly benefit equal to the target benefit percentage times the
participants highest average monthly cash compensation during five consecutive calendar years
within the last ten calendar years of employment. This monthly benefit is reduced by the monthly
benefit the participant receives from Social Security, the RIP, the ERISA Excess Retirement Plan
and the annuity equivalent of the two percent automatic contributions to the qualified 401(k)
defined
24
contribution plan and the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan. The BRP was frozen as of December 31,
2008. The Corporation anticipates that the ERISA Excess Retirement Plan will be frozen as of
December 31, 2010.
The net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit plans includes the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
|
$ |
2,580 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
5,244 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
(5,621 |
) |
|
|
(5,388 |
) |
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net transition asset |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Unrecognized prior service credit |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(896 |
) |
Unrecognized loss |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,203 |
|
|
$ |
3,680 |
|
|
$ |
3,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations subsidiaries participate in a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan
under which eligible employees may contribute a percentage of their salary. The Corporation
matches 50 percent of an eligible employees contribution on the first 6 percent that the employee
defers. Employees are generally eligible to participate upon having attained age 21. Beginning
with 2007, in light of the change to the RIP benefit, the Corporation began making an automatic two
percent contribution and may make an additional contribution of up to two percent depending on the
Corporation achieving its performance goals for the plan year. Effective January 1, 2008, in lieu
of the RIP benefit, the automatic contribution for substantially all new full-time employees was
increased from two percent to four percent. The Corporations contribution expense was $3,724 and
$3,159 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2011, the Corporation has adopted a safe-harbor contribution method in
which the Corporation will match 100 percent of the first four percent that the employee defers.
In addition, substantially all employees will be eligible for a three percent automatic
contribution after each calendar year end and may be eligible for an additional contribution of up
to two percent depending on the Corporation achieving its performance goals for the plan year.
The Corporation also sponsors an ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan for certain officers. This plan
provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the maximum benefit allowable
under the Internal Revenue Code and the amount that would have been provided under the qualified
401(k) defined contribution plan, if no limits were applied.
The Corporation sponsors a pre-Medicare eligible postretirement medical insurance plan for
retirees of certain affiliates between the ages of 62 and 65. During 2006, the Corporation amended
the plan such that only employees who were age 60 or older as of January 1, 2007 are eligible for
employer-paid coverage. The Corporation has no plan assets attributable to this plan and funds the
benefits as claims arise. Benefit costs related to this plan are recognized in the periods in
which employees provide the service for such benefits. The Corporation reserves the right to
terminate the plan or make plan changes at any time.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
INCOME TAXES
The Corporation bases its provision for income taxes upon income before income taxes, adjusted
for the effect of certain tax-exempt income and non-deductible expenses. In addition, the
Corporation reports certain items of income and expense in different periods for financial
reporting and tax return purposes. The Corporation recognizes the tax effects of these temporary
differences currently in the deferred income tax provision or benefit. The Corporation computes
deferred tax assets or liabilities based upon the differences between the financial statement and
income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the applicable marginal tax rate.
The Corporation must evaluate the probability that it will ultimately realize the full value
of its deferred tax assets. Realization of the Corporations deferred tax assets is dependent upon
a number of factors including the existence of any cumulative losses in prior periods, the amount
of taxes paid in available carry-back periods, expectations for future earnings, applicable tax
planning strategies and assessment of current and future economic and business conditions. The
Corporation establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the
Corporation will not be able to realize a benefit from its deferred tax assets, or when future
deductibility is uncertain.
At September 30, 2010, the Corporation anticipates that it will not utilize state net
operating loss carryforwards and other net deferred tax assets at certain of its subsidiaries and
has recorded a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. The Corporation believes that,
except for the portion which is covered by the valuation allowance, it is more likely than not the
Corporation will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets, net of the valuation allowance,
at September 30, 2010 based on the level of historical taxable income and taxes paid in available
carry-back periods.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,217 |
|
|
$ |
10,306 |
|
|
$ |
51,119 |
|
|
$ |
36,555 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arising during the period, net of
tax expense (benefit) of $852,
$1,860, $2,943 and $(3,046) |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
5,465 |
|
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
Less: reclassification adjustment
for losses (gains) included in net
income, net of tax (benefit) expense
of $28, $(1,098), $80 and $(1,307) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
2,428 |
|
Pension and postretirement
amortization, net of tax expense
(benefit) of $187, $(147), $988 and
$110 |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
5,219 |
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
(3,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
19,094 |
|
|
$ |
15,525 |
|
|
$ |
58,271 |
|
|
$ |
33,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net
of tax are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-credit related loss on debt securities not expected to be sold |
|
$ |
(9,181 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,254 |
) |
Unrealized net gain (loss) on other available for sale securities |
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
Unrecognized pension and postretirement obligations |
|
|
(21,777 |
) |
|
|
(21,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(23,481 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per common share is computed using net income available to common stockholders, which
is net income adjusted for the preferred stock dividend and discount amortization.
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding net of unvested
shares of restricted stock.
Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common
stockholders adjusted for interest expense on convertible debt by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of potential common shares
issuable for stock options, warrants, restricted shares and convertible debt, as calculated using
the treasury stock method. Adjustments to the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding are made only when such adjustments dilute earnings per common share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income available to common
stockholders basic earnings per
share |
|
$ |
17,217 |
|
|
$ |
4,809 |
|
|
$ |
51,119 |
|
|
$ |
28,246 |
|
Interest expense on convertible debt |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders after assumed
conversion diluted earnings per
share |
|
$ |
17,222 |
|
|
$ |
4,814 |
|
|
$ |
51,134 |
|
|
$ |
28,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
113,983,990 |
|
|
|
113,571,703 |
|
|
|
113,871,635 |
|
|
|
98,869,326 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock
options, warrants, restricted
stock and convertible debt |
|
|
502,261 |
|
|
|
299,234 |
|
|
|
416,965 |
|
|
|
235,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
114,486,251 |
|
|
|
113,870,937 |
|
|
|
114,288,600 |
|
|
|
99,105,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 835,375 and 1,437,326 shares of common
stock, respectively, related to stock options and warrants were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the shares was greater than the average
market price of the common shares and therefore, the effect would be antidilutive. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 870,784 and 1,559,725 shares of common stock,
respectively, related to stock options and warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the exercise price of the shares was greater than the average market
price of the common shares and therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.
27
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Following is a summary of supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings |
|
$ |
70,394 |
|
|
$ |
97,452 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
23,950 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned |
|
|
22,033 |
|
|
|
13,431 |
|
Financing of other real estate owned sold |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Corporation operates in four reportable segments: Community Banking, Wealth Management,
Insurance and Consumer Finance.
|
|
|
The Community Banking segment provides services traditionally offered by full-service
commercial banks, including commercial and individual demand, savings and time deposit
accounts and commercial, mortgage and individual installment loans. |
|
|
|
|
The Wealth Management segment provides a broad range of personal and corporate fiduciary
services including the administration of decedent and trust estates. In addition, it
offers various alternative products, including securities brokerage and investment advisory
services, mutual funds and annuities. |
|
|
|
|
The Insurance segment includes a full-service insurance agency offering all lines of
commercial and personal insurance through major carriers. The Insurance segment also
includes a reinsurer. |
|
|
|
|
The Consumer Finance segment primarily makes installment loans to individuals and
purchases installment sales finance contracts from retail merchants. The Consumer Finance
segment activity is funded through the sale of the Corporations subordinated notes at the
finance companys branch offices. |
The following tables provide financial information for these segments of the Corporation. The
information provided under the caption Parent and Other represents operations not considered to
be reportable segments and/or general operating expenses of the Corporation, and includes the
parent company, other non-bank subsidiaries and eliminations and adjustments which are necessary
for purposes of reconciliation to the consolidated amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
84,282 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
8,534 |
|
|
$ |
1,079 |
|
|
$ |
93,947 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
21,688 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
66,381 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
(1,492 |
) |
|
|
72,259 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
12,313 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
20,434 |
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
27,754 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
51,611 |
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
4,041 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
62,572 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
|
|
6,236 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
17,017 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
(1,917 |
) |
|
|
17,217 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,800,430 |
|
|
|
20,139 |
|
|
|
19,642 |
|
|
|
168,269 |
|
|
|
(15,437 |
) |
|
|
8,993,043 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
537,073 |
|
|
|
12,054 |
|
|
|
11,884 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,820 |
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
87,861 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
8,154 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
96,750 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
24,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
28,989 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
63,098 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
6,801 |
|
|
|
(2,205 |
) |
|
|
67,761 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
14,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
16,455 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
16,830 |
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
23,745 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
49,512 |
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
60,589 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
(1,549 |
) |
|
|
2,424 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
11,215 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
|
|
10,306 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,398,925 |
|
|
|
19,881 |
|
|
|
21,152 |
|
|
|
167,720 |
|
|
|
(11,806 |
) |
|
|
8,595,872 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
543,058 |
|
|
|
12,409 |
|
|
|
12,302 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
252,988 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
24,660 |
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
280,854 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
57,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
7,443 |
|
|
|
68,709 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
195,395 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
20,987 |
|
|
|
(4,402 |
) |
|
|
212,145 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
31,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
36,516 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
62,389 |
|
|
|
15,339 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
86,472 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
154,399 |
|
|
|
12,209 |
|
|
|
8,835 |
|
|
|
11,953 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
187,733 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
4,458 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
17,773 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
(3,214 |
) |
|
|
18,208 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
49,703 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
(5,054 |
) |
|
|
51,119 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,800,430 |
|
|
|
20,139 |
|
|
|
19,642 |
|
|
|
168,269 |
|
|
|
(15,437 |
) |
|
|
8,993,043 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
537,073 |
|
|
|
12,054 |
|
|
|
11,884 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months |
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
Interest income |
|
$ |
266,042 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
24,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
$ |
292,058 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
81,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
|
94,711 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
184,307 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
(6,938 |
) |
|
|
197,347 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
35,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
40,878 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
57,747 |
|
|
|
14,856 |
|
|
|
10,749 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
|
|
80,202 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
149,998 |
|
|
|
11,875 |
|
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
11,680 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
184,198 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,360 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
12,213 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
(4,991 |
) |
|
|
10,558 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
39,353 |
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
(8,701 |
) |
|
|
36,555 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,398,925 |
|
|
|
19,881 |
|
|
|
21,152 |
|
|
|
167,720 |
|
|
|
(11,806 |
) |
|
|
8,595,872 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
543,058 |
|
|
|
12,409 |
|
|
|
12,302 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569,578 |
|
29
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Corporation uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain
financial assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for
sale and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to
time, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis,
such as mortgage loans held for sale, certain impaired loans, OREO and certain other assets.
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. Fair value
is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the
asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure.
In determining fair value, the Corporation uses various valuation approaches, including
market, income and cost approaches. ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of
observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs
be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability, which are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent
of the Corporation. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, which are
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The fair value hierarchy is broken down into three
levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for
identical instruments traded in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
valuation is based upon quoted market prices for similar
instruments traded in active markets, quoted market prices for
identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not
active and model-based valuation techniques for which all
significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be
corroborated by market data. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
valuation is derived from other valuation methodologies including
discounted cash flow models and similar techniques that use
significant assumptions not observable in the market. These
unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that
market participants would use in determining fair value. |
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies the Corporation uses for financial
instruments recorded at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis:
Securities Available For Sale
Securities available for sale consists of both debt and equity securities. These securities
are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. At September 30, 2010, approximately 97.7% of
these securities used valuation methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information,
collectively Level 1 and Level 2 measurements, to measure fair value. The remaining 2.3% of these
securities were measured using model-based techniques, with primarily unobservable (Level 3)
inputs.
The Corporation closely monitors market conditions involving assets that have become less
actively traded. If the fair value measurement is based upon recent observable market activity of
such assets or comparable assets (other than forced or distressed transactions) that occur in
sufficient volume, and do not require significant adjustment using
30
unobservable inputs, those assets are classified as Level 1 or Level 2; if not, they are classified
as Level 3. Making this assessment requires significant judgment.
The Corporation uses prices from independent pricing services and, to a lesser extent,
indicative (non-binding) quotes from independent brokers, to measure the fair value of investment
securities. The Corporation validates prices received from pricing services or brokers using a
variety of methods, including, but not limited to, comparison to secondary pricing services,
corroboration of pricing by reference to other independent market data such as secondary broker
quotes and relevant benchmark indices, and review of pricing by corporate personnel familiar with
market liquidity and other market-related conditions.
The Corporation determines the valuation of its investments in trust preferred debt securities
with the assistance of a third-party independent financial consulting firm that specializes in
advisory services related to illiquid financial investments. The consulting firm provides the
Corporation appropriate valuation methodology, performance assumptions, modeling techniques,
discounted cash flows, discount rates and sensitivity analyses with respect to levels of defaults
and deferrals necessary to produce losses. Additionally, the Corporation utilizes the firms
expertise to reassess assumptions to reflect actual conditions. See the Securities footnote for
information on how the Corporation reassesses assumptions to determine the valuation of its trust
preferred debt securities. Accessing the services of a financial consulting firm with a focus on
financial instruments assists the Corporation in accurately valuing these complex financial
instruments and facilitates informed decision-making with respect to such instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation determines its fair value for derivatives using widely accepted valuation
techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis reflects contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.
The Corporation incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its
own non-performance risk and the respective counterpartys non-performance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
non-performance risk, the Corporation considers the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of September
30, 2010, the Corporation has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a
result, the Corporation has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Residential Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
These loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Under lower of cost or fair value
accounting, periodically, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value adjustments. Fair
value, when recorded, is based on independent quoted market prices for similar assets and is
classified as Level 2.
Impaired Loans
The Corporation reserves for commercial and commercial real estate loans that the Corporation
considers impaired as defined in ASC Topic 310 at the time the Corporation identifies the loan as
impaired based upon the present value of expected future cash flows available to pay the loan, or
based upon the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs where a loan is collateral
dependent. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and
accounts receivable.
The Corporation determines the value of real estate based on appraisals by licensed or
certified appraisers. The value of business assets is generally based on amounts reported on the
businesss financial statements. Management must rely on the financial statements prepared and
certified by the borrower or its accountants in determining the value of these business assets on
an ongoing basis which may be subject to significant change over time. Based on the quality
31
of information or statements provided, management may require the use of business asset appraisals
and site-inspections to better value these assets. The Corporation may discount appraised and
reported values based on managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the
time of valuation or managements knowledge of the borrower and the borrowers business. Since not
all valuation inputs are observable, the Corporation classifies these nonrecurring fair value
determinations as Level 2 or Level 3 based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement.
The Corporation reviews and evaluates impaired loans no less frequently than quarterly for
additional impairment based on the same factors identified above.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO is comprised of commercial and residential real estate properties obtained in partial or
total satisfaction of loan obligations plus some bank owned real estate. OREO acquired in
settlement of indebtedness is recorded at the lower of the carrying amount of the loan or fair
value less costs to sell. Subsequently, these assets are carried at the lower of the carrying
value or fair value less costs to sell. Accordingly, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring
fair value adjustments. Fair value, when recorded, is generally based upon appraisals by licensed
or certified appraisers and is classified as Level 2.
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,051 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,385 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,185 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,486 |
|
|
|
16,313 |
|
|
|
736,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services industry |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
Insurance services industry |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
721,748 |
|
|
|
16,672 |
|
|
|
738,828 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
758,773 |
|
|
$ |
16,672 |
|
|
$ |
775,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
252,456 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
252,456 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,771 |
|
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,508 |
|
Non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697,363 |
|
|
|
15,254 |
|
|
|
712,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services industry |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
Insurance services industry |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
698,748 |
|
|
|
15,587 |
|
|
|
715,349 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
712,053 |
|
|
$ |
15,587 |
|
|
$ |
728,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and for which the Corporation has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
4,824 |
|
|
$ |
10,430 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
15,587 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
5,162 |
|
|
$ |
11,150 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
16,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
14,626 |
|
|
$ |
8,475 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
23,394 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(7,098 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,098 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,465 |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
4,824 |
|
|
$ |
10,430 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
15,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation reviews fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in
the observability of the valuation attributes may result in reclassification of certain financial
assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in/out of Level 3 at fair
value at the beginning of the period in which the changes occur.
The amount of total losses included in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 and for the year 2009 attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to
assets still held as of those dates was $2,281, $3,510 and $7,098, respectively. These losses are
included in net impairment losses on securities reported as a component of non-interest income.
In accordance with GAAP, from time to time, the Corporation measures certain assets at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application
of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Valuation
methodologies used to measure these fair value adjustments were previously described. For assets
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis still held in the balance sheet, the following table
provides the hierarchy level and the fair value of the related assets or portfolios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,246 |
|
|
$ |
42,944 |
|
|
$ |
45,190 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,776 |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
21,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
21,981 |
|
|
|
24,775 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
|
14,616 |
|
Impaired loans measured or re-measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 had a carrying amount of $48,646 and an allocated allowance for
loan losses of $10,167 at September 30, 2010. The allocated allowance is based on fair value of
$45,190 less estimated costs to sell of $6,711. The allowance for loan losses includes a provision
applicable to the current period fair value measurements of $6,971 which was included in the
provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
OREO with a carrying amount of $28,417 was written down to $21,802 (fair value of $25,187 less
estimated costs to sell of $3,385), resulting in a loss of $6,615, which was included in earnings
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each financial
instrument:
Cash and Due from Banks, Short-Term Investments, Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest
Payable. For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair
value.
Securities. For both securities available for sale and securities held to maturity, fair value
equals the quoted market price from an active market, if available, and is classified within Level
1. If a quoted market price is not available, fair
34
value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities or pricing models, and is
classified as Level 2. Where there is limited market activity or significant valuation inputs are
unobservable, securities are classified within Level 3. Under current market conditions,
assumptions used to determine the fair value of Level 3 securities have greater subjectivity due to
the lack of observable market transactions.
Loans. The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using
the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and
for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of variable and adjustable rate loans
approximates the carrying amount.
Bank Owned Life Insurance. The Corporation owns both general account and separate account bank
owned life insurance (BOLI). The fair value of general account BOLI is based on the insurance
contract cash surrender value. The fair value of separate account BOLI equals the quoted market
price of the underlying securities, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair
value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. In connection with the
separate account BOLI, the Corporation has purchased a stable value protection product that
mitigates the impact of market value fluctuations of the underlying separate account assets.
Deposits. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity deposits is
estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
Short-Term Borrowings. The carrying amounts for short-term borrowings approximate fair value for
amounts that mature in 90 days or less. The fair value of subordinated notes is estimated by
discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered.
Long-Term and Junior Subordinated Debt. The fair value of long-term and junior subordinated debt
is estimated by discounting future cash flows based on the market prices for the same or similar
issues or on the current rates offered to the Corporation for debt of the same remaining
maturities.
Loan Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit. Estimates of the fair value of these off-balance
sheet items were not made because of the short-term nature of these arrangements and the credit
standing of the counterparties. Also, unfunded loan commitments relate principally to variable
rate commercial loans, typically non-binding, and fees are not normally assessed on these balances.
The estimated fair values of the Corporations financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
$ |
307,021 |
|
|
$ |
307,021 |
|
|
$ |
310,550 |
|
|
$ |
310,550 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
738,828 |
|
|
|
738,828 |
|
|
|
715,349 |
|
|
|
715,349 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
869,765 |
|
|
|
904,589 |
|
|
|
775,281 |
|
|
|
796,537 |
|
Net loans, including loans held for sale |
|
|
5,904,679 |
|
|
|
5,951,693 |
|
|
|
5,757,460 |
|
|
|
5,770,824 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
207,402 |
|
|
|
207,402 |
|
|
|
205,447 |
|
|
|
205,447 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
26,944 |
|
|
|
26,944 |
|
|
|
27,219 |
|
|
|
27,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
6,597,828 |
|
|
|
6,641,540 |
|
|
|
6,380,223 |
|
|
|
6,420,971 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
817,582 |
|
|
|
818,313 |
|
|
|
669,167 |
|
|
|
669,712 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
203,257 |
|
|
|
210,746 |
|
|
|
324,877 |
|
|
|
333,494 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
204,204 |
|
|
|
104,128 |
|
|
|
204,711 |
|
|
|
90,721 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
8,951 |
|
|
|
8,951 |
|
35
PART I.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Managements discussion and analysis represents an overview of the consolidated results of
operations and financial condition of the Corporation and highlights material changes to the
financial condition and results of operations at and for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2010. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The Corporations results of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected
for the year ending December 31, 2010.
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which statements generally can be identified by the use
of forward-looking terminology, such as may, will, expect, estimate, anticipate,
believe, target, plan, project or continue or the negatives thereof or other variations
thereon or similar terminology, and are made on the basis of managements current plans and
analyses of the Corporation, its business and the industry as a whole. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, economic
conditions, competition, interest rate sensitivity and the impact of regulatory and legislative
changes, including those resulting from the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) and any requirements adopted by the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision. The above factors in some cases could affect the Corporations
financial performance and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements. The Corporation does not undertake to update or revise
its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that the
Corporation will not realize any projected results expressed or implied therein.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of the Corporations critical accounting policies is included in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of
the Corporations 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading Application of Critical
Accounting Policies. There have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies or
the assumptions and judgments utilized in applying these policies since the year ended December 31,
2009.
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Hermitage,
Pennsylvania. Its primary businesses include community banking, consumer finance, wealth
management and insurance. The Corporation also conducts leasing and merchant banking activities.
The Corporation operates its community banking business through a full service branch network with
offices in Pennsylvania and Ohio. The Corporation operates its wealth management and insurance
businesses within the community banking branch network. It also conducts selected consumer finance
business in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee.
Because the Corporation issued preferred stock to the UST in January 2009, the Corporation
reported net income available to common stockholders for the periods in which the preferred stock
was outstanding. Net income available to common stockholders is calculated by subtracting the
preferred stock dividends and discount amortization from net income.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $17.2 million or $0.15 per
diluted share, compared to net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 of $4.8 million or $0.04 per diluted common share. Net income available to
common stockholders for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was derived by reducing net
income by $5.5 million related to preferred stock dividends and discount amortization associated
with the Corporations participation in the CPP. For the three months ended
36
September 30, 2010, the Corporations return on average equity was 6.43% and its return on average
assets was 0.76%, compared to 3.62% and 0.47%, respectively, for the three months ended September
30, 2009.
In addition to evaluating its results of operations in accordance with GAAP, the Corporation
routinely supplements its evaluation with an analysis of certain non-GAAP financial measures, such
as return on average tangible equity, return on average tangible common equity and return on
average tangible assets. The Corporation believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide
information useful to investors in understanding the Corporations operating performance and
trends, and facilitates comparisons with the performance of the Corporations peers. The non-GAAP
financial measures used by the Corporation may differ from the non-GAAP financial measures other
financial institutions use to measure their results of operations. The following tables summarize
the Corporations non-GAAP financial measures for the quarterly periods indicated derived from
amounts reported in the Corporations financial statements (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Return on average tangible common equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders (annualized) |
|
$ |
68,308 |
|
|
$ |
19,085 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,627 |
|
|
$ |
23,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,062,512 |
|
|
$ |
1,128,898 |
|
Less: Average preferred stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,727 |
) |
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(563,631 |
) |
|
|
(570,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
498,881 |
|
|
$ |
485,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity |
|
|
14.56 |
% |
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (annualized) |
|
$ |
68,308 |
|
|
$ |
40,887 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,627 |
|
|
$ |
45,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
$ |
8,958,692 |
|
|
$ |
8,701,853 |
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(563,631 |
) |
|
|
(570,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,395,061 |
|
|
$ |
8,131,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
0.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields earned on
interest earning assets and the average balances and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks (4) |
|
$ |
162,377 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
$ |
269,425 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Taxable investment securities (1) |
|
|
1,428,043 |
|
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
1,272,091 |
|
|
|
12,771 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
Non-taxable investment securities (2) |
|
|
184,569 |
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
194,086 |
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
Loans (2) (3) |
|
|
5,998,926 |
|
|
|
82,257 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
5,814,013 |
|
|
|
82,672 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets (2) |
|
|
7,773,915 |
|
|
|
95,613 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
7,549,615 |
|
|
|
98,394 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
147,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(117,982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
115,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,039,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,958,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,701,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
2,439,563 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
2,256,086 |
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
Savings |
|
|
867,693 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
845,082 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Certificates and other time |
|
|
2,201,454 |
|
|
|
13,001 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
2,223,126 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
660,762 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
465,250 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
129,753 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
|
118,274 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
208,433 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
412,411 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
204,287 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
204,962 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities (2) |
|
|
6,711,945 |
|
|
|
21,687 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
6,525,191 |
|
|
|
28,989 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
|
1,077,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
106,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,896,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,572,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,062,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,958,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,701,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of interest earning assets over
interest bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
1,061,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,024,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average balances and yields earned on taxable investment securities are based on
historical cost. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest income amounts are reflected on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, a
non-GAAP measure, which adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and
investments using the federal statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The yields
on earning assets and the net interest margin are presented on an FTE and annualized basis.
The rates paid on interest bearing liabilities are also presented on an annualized basis. The
Corporation believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest
income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual loans. Loans consist of average total loans less
average unearned income. The amount of loan fees included in interest income on loans is
immaterial. |
|
(4) |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks includes balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. |
38
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which is the Corporations principal source of revenue, is the difference
between interest income from earning assets (loans, securities, interest bearing deposits with
banks and federal funds sold) and interest expense paid on liabilities (deposits, treasury
management accounts and short- and long-term borrowings). For the three months ended September 30,
2010, net interest income, which comprised 72.3% of net revenue (net interest income plus
non-interest income) compared to 74.1% for the same period in 2009, was affected by the general
level of interest rates, changes in interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, the level of
non-accrual loans and changes in the amount and mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities.
Net interest income, on an FTE basis, increased $4.5 million or 6.5% from $69.4 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $73.9 million for the same period of 2010. Average
earning assets increased $224.3 million or 3.0% and average interest bearing liabilities increased
$186.8 million or 2.9% from the three months ended September 30, 2009 due to investment, loan,
deposit and treasury management growth. The Corporations net interest margin increased from 3.66%
for the third quarter of 2009 to 3.78% for the third quarter of 2010 as deposit rates declined
faster than loan yields along with an improved funding mix with higher transaction account balances
and lower long-term debt. Details on changes in tax equivalent net interest income attributed to
changes in interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, yields and cost of funds are set
forth in the preceding table.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in net interest income
attributable to changes in the volumes of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities
and changes in the rates for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Securities |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
(3,026 |
) |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
(2,107 |
) |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
(5,087 |
) |
|
|
(2,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Certificates and other time |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(3,047 |
) |
|
|
(3,199 |
) |
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(2,385 |
) |
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
(5,755 |
) |
|
|
(7,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change |
|
$ |
3,853 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
4,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount of change not solely due to rate or volume changes was allocated
between the change due to rate and the change due to volume based on the net size of
the rate and volume changes. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis which adjusts for the
tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal
statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The Corporation believes this
measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides
relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
Interest income, on an FTE basis, of $95.6 million for the third quarter of 2010
decreased by $2.8 million or 2.8% from the same period of 2009 due to lower yields, partially
offset by increased earning assets. Average earning assets of $7.8 billion for the third quarter
of 2010 grew $224.3 million or 3.0% from the same period of 2009 primarily driven by increases in
average investments and average loans, partially offset by a decrease in interest bearing deposits
with banks. The yield on earning assets decreased 29 basis points from the three months ended
September 30, 2009 to 4.89% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, reflecting the decreases
in market interest rates.
39
Interest expense of $21.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $7.3
million or 25.2% from the same period of 2009 due to lower rates paid partially offset by growth in
interest bearing liabilities. The rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 48 basis
points to 1.28% during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009, reflecting
changes in interest rates and a favorable shift in mix. Average interest bearing liabilities
increased $186.8 million or 2.9% to average $6.7 billion for the third quarter of 2010. This
growth was primarily attributable to growth in deposits and treasury management accounts, which
increased by $379.9 million or 6.6% for the third quarter of 2010, compared to the same period of
2009, driven by success with ongoing marketing campaigns designed to attract new customers combined
with customer preferences to keep funds in banks due to uncertainties in the market. This growth
was partially offset by a $204.0 million or 49.5% reduction in long-term debt associated with the
pre-payment and maturities of certain higher cost borrowings since September 30, 2009.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is determined based on managements estimates of the appropriate
level of allowance for loan losses needed to absorb probable losses inherent in the existing loan
portfolio, after giving consideration to charge-offs and recoveries for the period.
The provision for loan losses of $12.3 million during the third quarter of 2010 decreased $4.1
million from the same period in 2009. During the third quarter of 2010, net charge-offs decreased
$0.3 million from the same period of 2009 as the Corporation recognized lower net charge-offs in
its Florida portfolio, which decreased $0.4 million compared to the third quarter of 2009. The
allowance for loan losses increased $10.7 million to $116.6 million at September 30, 2010 from
September 30, 2009. While the economy is recovering from the recession, the duration of the slow
economic environment remains a challenge for borrowers, particularly in the Corporations Florida
portfolio. The $12.3 million provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2010 was comprised
of $5.9 million relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $1.6 million relating to Regency and $4.8
million relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio, which is predominantly in
Pennsylvania. During the third quarter of 2010, net charge-offs were $9.7 million or 0.64%
(annualized) of average loans compared to $10.0 million or 0.68% (annualized) of average loans for
the same period in 2009. The net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2010 were comprised of $3.7
million or 6.59% (annualized) of average loans relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $1.6 million or
3.84% (annualized) of average loans relating to Regency and $4.4 million or 0.32% (annualized) of
average loans relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio. For additional information
relating to the allowance and provision for loan losses, refer to the Allowance and Provision for
Loan Losses section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income of $27.8 million for the third quarter of 2010 increased $4.0
million or 16.9% from the same period of 2009. Increases in securities commissions and fees, trust
income and other non-interest income combined with lower OTTI charges were offset by decreases in
service charges and insurance commissions and fees. These items, and other variances in
non-interest income, are further explained in the following paragraphs.
Service charges on loans and deposits of $14.3 million for the third quarter of 2010 decreased
$0.5 million or 3.5% from the same period of 2009, reflecting lower overdraft fees resulting from
changes in the pattern of consumer behavior and the implementation of Regulation E, which was
effective for new accounts on July 1, 2010 and existing accounts on August 15, 2010. The
Corporation estimates a $1.2 million reduction in revenues from overdraft fees during the remaining
three months of 2010, which could lower fourth quarter earnings by $0.01 per share. The lower
overdraft fees were partially offset by higher check card fees.
Insurance commissions and fees of $3.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
decreased slightly from $4.0 million for the same period of 2009.
Securities commissions of $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2010 increased by $0.3 million
or 23.6% from the same period of 2009 primarily due to higher revenue generated from increased
financial consultant activity during 2010.
Trust fees of $3.1 million for the third quarter of 2010 increased by $0.2 million or 8.0%
from the same period of 2009 due to the effect of improved market conditions on assets under
management compared to 2009.
Income from BOLI of $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 remained
consistent with the same period of 2009.
40
Gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans of $1.0 million for the third quarter of 2010
increased from $0.7 million for the same period of 2009. For the third quarter of 2010, the
Corporation sold $47.8 million of residential mortgage loans compared to $44.0 million for the same
period of 2009 as part of its ongoing strategy of generally selling 30-year residential mortgage
loans.
There were no net impairment losses on securities for the three months ended September 30,
2010, compared to losses of $3.3 million from the same period of 2009.
Other income of $2.2 million for the third quarter of 2010 increased $0.4 million or 20.6%
from the same period of 2009. The primary items contributing to this increase were $0.2 million
more in fees earned through an interest rate swap program for larger commercial customers who
desire fixed rate loans while the Corporation benefits from a variable rate asset, thereby helping
to reduce volatility in its net interest income, combined with a $0.5 million impairment loss
related to the Corporations merchant banking subsidiary during the third quarter of 2009. These
items were partially offset by $0.2 million less in recoveries on impaired loans acquired in
previous acquisitions.
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense of $64.2 million for the third quarter of 2010 increased $1.9
million or 3.1% from the same period of 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to an
increase in salaries and employee benefits expense. This increase, and other variances in
non-interest expense, is further explained in the following paragraphs.
Salaries and employee benefits of $33.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
increased $2.5 million or 7.8% from the same period of 2009. This increase was primarily
attributable to higher exempt salary expense due to merit increases and more full-time employees in
2010 combined with higher deferred compensation and restricted stock expense.
Combined net occupancy and equipment expense of $9.3 million for the third quarter of 2010
remained unchanged compared to the same period in 2009.
Amortization of intangibles expense of $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2010 decreased
slightly from the same period of 2009 due to a combination of certain intangible assets being
completely amortized during 2009 and lower amortization expense on some intangible assets due to
accelerated amortization methods.
Outside services expense of $5.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
decreased $0.1 million or 1.4% from the same period in 2009, primarily resulting from decreases in
legal, consulting and courier expenses, partially offset by an increase in fees associated with ATM
services.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance of $2.6 million for the third quarter
of 2010 remained unchanged compared to the same period of 2009.
Other non-interest expense decreased to $11.1 million for the third quarter of 2010 from $11.5
million for the third quarter of 2009. This decrease was primarily the result of decreases in
marketing, insurance benefit and telephone expenses, partially offset by increases in supplies and
business development expenses.
Income Taxes
The Corporations income tax expense of $6.2 million for the third quarter of 2010 increased
$3.8 million or 157.3% from the same period of 2009. The effective tax rate of 26.59% for the
third quarter of 2010 increased from 19.04% for the same period of 2009 primarily due to higher
taxable income for the third quarter of 2010. Both periods tax rates are lower than the 35.0%
federal statutory tax rate due to the tax benefits primarily resulting from tax-exempt instruments
and excludable dividend income.
41
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $51.1 million or $0.45 per diluted
share, compared to net income available to common stockholders for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 of $28.2 million or $0.29 per diluted common share. Net income available to common
stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was derived by reducing net income by
$8.3 million related to preferred stock dividends and discount amortization associated with the
Corporations participation in the CPP. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Corporations return on average equity was 6.48% and its return on average assets was 0.77%,
compared to 4.58% and 0.57%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The following tables summarize the Corporations non-GAAP financial measures for the
year-to-date periods indicated derived from amounts reported in the Corporations financial
statements (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Return on average tangible common equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders (annualized) |
|
$ |
68,346 |
|
|
$ |
37,766 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,727 |
|
|
$ |
42,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,054,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,066,683 |
|
Less: Average preferred stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,035 |
) |
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(565,290 |
) |
|
|
(572,444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
488,825 |
|
|
$ |
409,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity |
|
|
14.88 |
% |
|
|
10.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (annualized) |
|
$ |
68,346 |
|
|
$ |
48,874 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized) |
|
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,727 |
|
|
$ |
53,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
$ |
8,860,202 |
|
|
$ |
8,580,797 |
|
Less: Average intangibles |
|
|
(565,290 |
) |
|
|
(572,444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,294,912 |
|
|
$ |
8,008,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible assets |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields earned on
interest earning assets and the average balances and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks (4) |
|
$ |
172,755 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
$ |
217,210 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,864 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
Taxable investment securities (1) |
|
|
1,375,233 |
|
|
|
33,100 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
1,183,180 |
|
|
|
38,366 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
Non-taxable investment securities (2) |
|
|
189,966 |
|
|
|
8,362 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
|
185,879 |
|
|
|
8,013 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
Loans (2) (3) |
|
|
5,942,654 |
|
|
|
244,035 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
5,815,899 |
|
|
|
249,906 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets (2) |
|
|
7,680,608 |
|
|
|
285,823 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
7,421,032 |
|
|
|
296,747 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
141,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(113,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
116,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,035,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,001,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,860,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,580,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
2,417,642 |
|
|
|
7,871 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
2,157,008 |
|
|
|
11,179 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
Savings |
|
|
856,638 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
848,157 |
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Certificates and other time |
|
|
2,213,129 |
|
|
|
40,960 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
2,276,079 |
|
|
|
53,471 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
625,567 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
451,208 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
129,809 |
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
108,919 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
233,238 |
|
|
|
6,462 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
444,087 |
|
|
|
13,622 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
204,454 |
|
|
|
5,984 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
205,130 |
|
|
|
7,658 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities (2) |
|
|
6,680,477 |
|
|
|
68,709 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
6,490,588 |
|
|
|
94,711 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
|
1,025,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
99,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,806,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,514,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,054,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,860,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,580,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of interest earning assets over
interest bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
1,000,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
930,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
212,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
197,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average balances and yields earned on taxable investment securities are based on
historical cost. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest income amounts are reflected on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, a
non-GAAP measure, which adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and
investments using the federal statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The yields
on earning assets and the net interest margin are presented on an FTE and annualized basis.
The rates paid on interest bearing liabilities are also presented on an annualized basis. The
Corporation believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest
income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual loans. Loans consist of average total loans less
average unearned income. The amount of loan fees included in interest income on loans is
immaterial. |
|
(4) |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks includes balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. |
43
Net Interest Income
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net interest income, which comprised 71.0% of
net revenue compared to 71.1% for the same period in 2009, was affected by the general level of
interest rates, changes in interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, the level of non-accrual
loans and changes in the amount and mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities.
Net interest income, on an FTE basis, increased $15.1 million or 7.5% from $202.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $217.1 million for the same period of 2010. Average
earning assets increased $259.6 million or 3.5% and average interest bearing liabilities increased
$189.9 million or 2.9% from the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to investment, loan,
deposit and treasury management growth. The Corporations net interest margin increased from 3.63%
for the first nine months of 2009 to 3.78% for the first nine months of 2010 as deposit rates
declined faster than loan yields along with an improved funding mix with higher transaction account
balances and lower long-term debt. Details on changes in tax equivalent net interest income
attributed to changes in interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, yields and cost of
funds are set forth in the preceding table.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in net interest income
attributable to changes in the volumes of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities
and changes in the rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
Securities |
|
|
4,473 |
|
|
|
(9,390 |
) |
|
|
(4,917 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
(8,264 |
) |
|
|
(5,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
(17,658 |
) |
|
|
(10,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
(3,961 |
) |
|
|
(3,308 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
Certificates and other time |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
(11,103 |
) |
|
|
(12,511 |
) |
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(5,948 |
) |
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
(7,160 |
) |
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(1,649 |
) |
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,192 |
) |
|
|
(20,810 |
) |
|
|
(26,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change |
|
$ |
11,926 |
|
|
$ |
3,152 |
|
|
$ |
15,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount of change not solely due to rate or volume changes was allocated
between the change due to rate and
the change due to volume based on the net size of the rate and volume changes. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis which adjusts for the
tax benefit of income on certain tax-
exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory tax rate of 35% for each
period presented. The
Corporation believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net
interest income and provides
relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
Interest income, on an FTE basis, of $285.8 million for the first nine months of 2010
decreased by $10.9 million or 3.7% from the same period of 2009. Average earning assets of $7.7
billion for the first nine months of 2010 grew $259.6 million or 3.5% from the same period of 2009
primarily driven by increases in average investments and average loans. The yield on earning
assets decreased 37 basis points from the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to 4.97% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, reflecting the decreases in market interest rates.
Interest expense of $68.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by
$26.0 million or 27.5% from the same period of 2009. The rate paid on interest bearing liabilities
decreased 58 basis points to 1.37% during the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine
months of 2009, reflecting changes in interest rates and a favorable shift in mix. Average
interest bearing liabilities increased $189.9 million or 2.9% to average $6.7 billion for the first
nine months of 2010. This growth was primarily attributable to growth in deposits and treasury
management
44
accounts, which increased by $380.5 million or 6.6% for the first nine months of 2010,
compared to the same period of 2009 driven by success with ongoing marketing campaigns designed to
attract new customers to the Corporations local approach to banking combined with customer
preferences to keep funds in banks due to uncertainties in the market. This growth was partially
offset by a $210.8 million or 47.5% decline in long-term debt associated with the pre-payment and
maturities of certain higher cost borrowings since September 30, 2009.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses of $36.5 million during the first nine months of 2010 decreased
$4.4 million from the same period in 2009. During the first nine months of 2010, net charge-offs
decreased $15.2 million from the same period of 2009 as the Corporation recognized lower net
charge-offs for its Florida portfolio, which decreased $17.0 million compared to the first nine
months of 2009. The allowance for loan losses increased $10.7 million to $116.6 million at
September 30, 2010. While the economy is recovering from the recession, the duration of the slow
economic environment remains a challenge for borrowers, particularly in the Corporations Florida
portfolio. The $36.5 million provision for loan losses for the first nine months of 2010 was
comprised of $15.9 million relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $4.5 million relating to Regency and
$16.1 million relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio, which is predominantly in
Pennsylvania. During the first nine months of 2010, net charge-offs were $24.5 million or 0.55%
(annualized) of average loans compared to $39.7 million or 0.91% (annualized) of average loans for
the same period in 2009. The net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2010 were comprised of
$6.5 million or 3.82% (annualized) of average loans relating to FNBPAs Florida region, $4.6
million or 3.84% (annualized) of average loans relating to Regency and $13.4 million or 0.32%
(annualized) of average loans relating to the remainder of the Corporations portfolio. For
additional information relating to the allowance and provision for loan losses, refer to the
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income of $86.5 million for the first nine months of 2010 increased $6.3
million or 7.8% from the same period of 2009. This increase resulted primarily from increases in
gain on sale of securities and recoveries on impaired loans previously acquired through
acquisitions, partially offset by lower OTTI charges. These items, and other variances in
non-interest income, are further explained in the following paragraphs.
Service charges on loans and deposits of $42.6 million for the first nine months of 2010
decreased $0.3 million or 0.7% from the same period of 2009, reflecting lower overdraft fees
resulting from changing patterns of consumer behavior and the implementation of Regulation E, which
was effective for new accounts on July 1, 2010 and existing accounts on August 15, 2010. The
Corporation estimates a $1.2 million reduction in revenues from overdraft fees during the remaining
three months of 2010, which could lower fourth quarter earnings by $0.01 per share. The lower
overdraft fees were partially offset by higher check card fees.
Insurance commissions and fees of $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
decreased $0.8 million or 6.1% from the same period of 2009 primarily as a result of lower
contingent revenues due to a less favorable loss ratio, combined with lower commission revenues and
premium reductions due to decreased customer exposures.
Securities commissions of $5.1 million for the first nine months of 2010 decreased by $0.1
million or 2.4% from the same period of 2009 primarily due to lower revenue generated from
financial consultant activity during 2010.
Trust fees of $9.4 million for the first nine months of 2010 increased by $0.6 million or 7.3%
from the same period of 2009 due to the effect of improved market conditions on assets under
management compared to 2009.
Income from BOLI of $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by
$0.6 million or 14.5% from the same period of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to
lower yields and a $13.7 million withdrawal from the policy during the second quarter of 2009 which
was redeployed into higher return assets.
Gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans of $2.3 million for the first nine months of
2010 remained unchanged from the same period of 2009. For the first nine months of 2010, the
Corporation sold $123.9 million of residential mortgage loans compared to $158.9 million for the
same period of 2009 as part of its ongoing strategy of generally selling 30-year residential
mortgage loans.
45
Gain on the sale of securities of $2.5 million for the first nine months of 2010 increased
$2.0 million from the same period of 2009 primarily a result of the Corporation selling a $6.0
million U.S. government agency security and $53.8 million of mortgage-backed securities in 2010 to
better position the balance sheet.
Net impairment losses on securities of $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 decreased by $1.9 million from the same period of 2009 due to fewer impairment losses during
2010 relating to investments in pooled TPS.
Other income of $10.9 million for the first nine months of 2010 increased $3.5 million or
48.2% from the same period of 2009. The primary items contributing to this increase were $2.6
million more in recoveries on impaired loans acquired in previous acquisitions, $1.1 million more
in gains relating to activity at the Corporations merchant banking subsidiary and $0.2 million
more in gains relating to the sale of repossessed assets. These items were partially offset by a
gain of $0.8 million recognized during the first nine months of 2009 on the sale of a building
acquired in a previous acquisition and a decrease of $0.8 million in fees earned through an
interest rate swap program for larger commercial customers who desire fixed rate loans while the
Corporation benefits from a variable rate asset, thereby helping to reduce volatility in its net
interest income.
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense of $192.8 million for the first nine months of 2010 increased $3.2
million or 1.7% from the same period of 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to
increases in salaries and employee benefits and other non-interest expense, partially offset by
decreases in FDIC insurance, outside services and amortization of intangibles. These items, and
other variances in non-interest expense, are further explained in the following paragraphs.
Salaries and employee benefits of $100.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
increased $5.3 million or 5.5% from the same period of 2009. This increase was primarily
attributable to increases in employee headcount along with employee insurance resulting from more
claims in the first nine months of 2010 than there were during the first nine months of 2009 and
deferred compensation and restricted stock awards as there were additional awards granted to more
participants during the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.
Combined net occupancy and equipment expense of $28.8 million for the first nine months of
2010 remained unchanged compared to the same period in 2009.
Amortization of intangibles expense of $5.0 million for the first nine months of 2010
decreased $0.3 million or 6.0% from the same period of 2009 due to a combination of certain
intangible assets being completely amortized during 2009 and lower amortization expense on some
intangible assets due to accelerated amortization methods.
Outside services expense of $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
decreased $0.5 million or 2.8% from the same period in 2009 primarily due to lower legal and
consulting fees during 2010 resulting from the completion of projects and loan workout efforts in
2009.
FDIC insurance of $7.9 million for the first nine months of 2010 decreased $3.3 million or
29.6% from the same period of 2009 primarily due to a one-time special assessment of $4.0 million
paid during the second quarter of 2009 partially offset by an increase in FDIC insurance premium
rates during the second half of 2009 combined with an increase in deposits.
Other non-interest expense increased to $33.6 million for the first nine months of 2010 from
$31.5 million for the first nine months of 2009. During the first nine months of 2010, the
Corporation recognized charges of $2.3 million associated with the pre-payment of certain higher
cost borrowings. Additionally, advertising and promotional expense for the first nine months of
2010 is $0.2 million higher than the first nine months of 2009 due to increased advertising in
connection with the Corporations efforts to attract new customers during a time of competitor
disruption in the marketplace. Telephone expense for the first nine months of 2010 is $0.6 million
lower than the first nine months of 2009 reflecting continued effective expense control.
Income Taxes
The Corporations income tax expense of $18.2 million for the first nine months of 2010
increased $7.7 million or 72.5% from the same period of 2009. The effective tax rate of 26.26% for
the first nine months of 2010 increased
46
from 22.41% for the same period of 2009 primarily due to the higher level of taxable income.
Income taxes and the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were
favorably impacted by $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, due to the resolution of
previously uncertain tax positions. Both periods tax rates are lower than the 35.0% federal
statutory tax rate due to the tax benefits primarily resulting from tax-exempt instruments and
excludable dividend income.
LIQUIDITY
The Corporations goal in liquidity management is to satisfy the cash flow requirements of
depositors and borrowers as well as the operating cash needs of the Corporation with cost-effective
funding. The Board of Directors of the Corporation has established an Asset/Liability Management
Policy in order to achieve and maintain earnings performance consistent with long-term goals while
maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate risk, a well-capitalized balance sheet and
adequate levels of liquidity. The Board of Directors of the Corporation has also established a
Contingency Funding Policy to address liquidity crisis conditions. These policies designate the
Corporate Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) as the body responsible for meeting these objectives.
The ALCO, which includes members of executive management, reviews liquidity on a periodic basis and
approves significant changes in strategies that affect balance sheet or cash flow positions.
Liquidity is centrally managed on a daily basis by the Corporations Treasury Department.
The principal sources of the parent companys liquidity are its strong existing cash resources
plus dividends it receives from its subsidiaries. These dividends may be impacted by the parents
or its subsidiaries capital needs, statutory laws and regulations, corporate policies, contractual
restrictions, profitability and other factors. Cash on hand at the parent at September 30, 2010
was $76.0 million, up from $74.9 million at December 31, 2009. Management believes these are
appropriate levels of cash for the Corporation given the current environment. Two metrics that are
used to gauge the adequacy of the parent companys cash position are the Liquidity Coverage Ratio
(LCR) and Months of Cash on Hand (MCH). The LCR is defined as the sum of cash on hand plus cash
inflows (next 12 months) divided by cash outflows (next 12 months). The LCR was 2.3x on September
30, 2010 and 2.1x on December 31, 2009. The MCH is defined as the number of months of corporate
expenses that can be covered by the cash on hand. The MCH was 12 months on September 30, 2010 and
12 months on December 31, 2009. During 2009, the Parent took a number of actions to bolster its
cash position. On January 9, 2009, the Corporation completed the sale of 100,000 shares of newly
issued Series C Preferred Stock valued at $100.0 million as part of the USTs CPP. The Corporation
redeemed the Series C Preferred Stock on September 9, 2009. Additionally, on January 21, 2009, the
Corporations Board of Directors elected to reduce the common stock cash dividend rate from $0.24
to $0.12 per quarter, thus reducing annual liquidity needs by approximately $55.0 million.
Finally, on June 16, 2009, the Corporation completed a common stock offering that raised $125.8
million in total capital, $98.0 million of which was invested in FNBPA. The parent also may draw
on an approved line of credit with a major domestic bank. This unused line was $15.0 million as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. During 2009, a $25.0 million committed line of credit
was negotiated with a major domestic bank on behalf of Regency. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, $10.0 million was outstanding. In addition, the Corporation also issues
subordinated notes through Regency on a regular basis. Subordinated notes increased $2.6 million
or 1.4% for the first nine months of 2010. This increase is net of an $11.4 million decrease in
the balance of a single customers account.
FNBPA generates liquidity from its normal business operations. Liquidity sources from assets
include payments from loans and investments as well as the ability to securitize, pledge or sell
loans, investment securities and other assets. Liquidity sources from liabilities are generated
primarily through the 223 banking offices of FNBPA in the form of deposits and treasury management
accounts. The Corporation also has access to reliable and cost-effective wholesale sources of
liquidity. Short-term and long-term funds can be acquired to help fund normal business operations
as well as serve as contingency funding in the event that the Corporation would be faced with a
liquidity crisis.
The liquidity position of the Corporation continues to be strong as evidenced by its ability
to generate strong growth in deposits and treasury management accounts. As a result, the
Corporation is less reliant on capital markets funding as witnessed by its ratio of total deposits
and treasury management accounts to total assets of 81.0% and 79.4% as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Over this time period, growth in deposits and treasury management
accounts was $368.0 million or 5.3%. FNBPA had unused wholesale credit availability of $3.0
billion or 34.6% of total assets at September 30, 2010 and $2.9 billion or 33.2% of total assets at
December 31, 2009. These sources include the availability to borrow from the FHLB, the FRB,
correspondent bank lines and access to certificates of deposit issued through brokers. FNBPA has
identified certain liquid assets, including overnight cash, unpledged securities and loans, which
could be sold to meet funding needs.
47
Included in these liquid assets are overnight balances and
unpledged government and agency securities which totaled 2.8% of total assets as of September 30,
2010 and 4.9% of total assets as of December 31, 2009. The decline in this ratio is due to the
pledging requirements associated with the growth in repurchase agreements. FNBPA recently received
approval to offer an offshore, non-collateralized, interest-bearing checking account. This account
is expected to substantially reduce the security pledging requirements of FNBPA as customers move
from repurchase agreements to this account. Consequently, the lower pledging requirements will
result in a higher level of unpledged government and agency securities available for contingency
funding needs.
Another metric for measuring liquidity risk is the liquidity gap analysis. The following
liquidity gap analysis (in thousands) for the Corporation compares the difference between cash
flows from existing assets and liabilities over future time intervals. Management seeks to limit
the size of the liquidity gap so that sources and uses of funds are reasonably matched in the
normal course of business. A matched position lays a better foundation for dealing with the
additional funding needs during a potential liquidity crisis. The cumulative gap to total assets
of 1.5% as of September 30, 2010 compares to an internal guideline of between -5.0% and +5.0%.
This metric was not calculated as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
2-3 |
|
|
4-6 |
|
|
7-12 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
1 Month |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
1 Year |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
168,627 |
|
|
$ |
309,850 |
|
|
$ |
411,026 |
|
|
$ |
753,927 |
|
|
$ |
1,643,430 |
|
Investments |
|
|
220,244 |
|
|
|
113,717 |
|
|
|
128,330 |
|
|
|
270,096 |
|
|
|
732,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,871 |
|
|
|
423,567 |
|
|
|
539,356 |
|
|
|
1,024,023 |
|
|
|
2,375,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
|
56,058 |
|
|
|
112,116 |
|
|
|
168,175 |
|
|
|
336,349 |
|
|
|
672,698 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
151,534 |
|
|
|
273,940 |
|
|
|
382,626 |
|
|
|
529,432 |
|
|
|
1,337,532 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
36,702 |
|
|
|
44,319 |
|
|
|
53,122 |
|
|
|
98,191 |
|
|
|
232,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,294 |
|
|
|
430,375 |
|
|
|
603,923 |
|
|
|
963,972 |
|
|
|
2,242,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Gap (Assets Liabilities) |
|
$ |
144,577 |
|
|
$ |
(6,808 |
) |
|
|
(64,567 |
) |
|
|
60,051 |
|
|
|
133,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap |
|
$ |
144,577 |
|
|
$ |
137,769 |
|
|
|
73,202 |
|
|
|
133,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap to Total Assets |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the ALCO regularly monitors various liquidity ratios and stress scenarios of the
Corporations liquidity position. Management believes the Corporation has sufficient liquidity
available to meet its normal operating and contingency funding cash needs.
MARKET RISK
Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. The Corporation is susceptible to impairment
charges on holdings in its investment portfolio. The Securities footnote discusses the impairment
charges taken during both 2010 and 2009 relating to the pooled TPS and bank stock portfolios. The
Securities footnote also discusses the ongoing process management utilizes to determine whether
impairment exists.
The Corporation is primarily exposed to interest rate risk inherent in its lending and
deposit-taking activities as a financial intermediary. To succeed in this capacity, the
Corporation offers an extensive variety of financial products to meet the diverse needs of its
customers. These products sometimes contribute to interest rate risk for the Corporation when
product groups do not complement one another. For example, depositors may want short-term deposits
while borrowers desire long-term loans.
Changes in market interest rates may result in changes in the fair value of the Corporations
financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. The ALCO is responsible for market risk
management which involves devising policy guidelines, risk measures and limits, and managing the
amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net
48
interest income and capital. The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments for
interest rate risk management purposes and not for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest rate risk is comprised of repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options
risk. Repricing risk arises from differences in the cash flow or repricing between asset and
liability portfolios. Basis risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to
different market rate indexes, which do not always change by the same amount. Yield curve risk
arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different maturities on a given yield
curve; when the yield curve changes shape, the risk position is altered. Options risk arises from
embedded options within asset and liability products as certain borrowers have the option to
prepay their loans when rates fall while certain depositors can redeem their certificates of
deposit early when rates rise.
The Corporation uses a sophisticated asset/liability model to measure its interest rate risk.
Interest rate risk measures utilized by the Corporation include earnings simulation, economic value
of equity (EVE) and gap analysis.
Gap analysis and EVE are static measures that do not incorporate assumptions regarding future
business. Gap analysis, while a helpful diagnostic tool, displays cash flows for only a single
rate environment. EVEs long-term horizon helps identify changes in optionality and longer-term
positions. However, EVEs liquidation perspective does not translate into the earnings-based
measures that are the focus of managing and valuing a going concern. Net interest income
simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of interest.
In these simulations, the Corporations current financial position is combined with assumptions
regarding future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate
scenarios. The ALCO reviews earnings simulations over multiple years under various interest rate
scenarios on a periodic basis. Reviewing these various measures provides the Corporation with a
comprehensive view of its interest rate profile.
The following repricing gap analysis (in thousands) compares the difference between the amount
of interest earning assets (IEA) and interest bearing liabilities (IBL) subject to repricing over a
period of time. A ratio of more than one indicates a higher level of repricing assets over
repricing liabilities for the time period. Conversely, a ratio of less than one indicates a higher
level of repricing liabilities over repricing assets for the time period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
2-3 |
|
|
4-6 |
|
|
7-12 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
1 Month |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
1 Year |
|
Interest Earning Assets (IEA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,958,689 |
|
|
$ |
490,028 |
|
|
$ |
364,126 |
|
|
$ |
630,091 |
|
|
$ |
3,442,934 |
|
Investments |
|
|
220,248 |
|
|
|
151,421 |
|
|
|
196,670 |
|
|
|
344,334 |
|
|
|
912,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,178,937 |
|
|
|
641,449 |
|
|
|
560,796 |
|
|
|
974,425 |
|
|
|
4,355,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities (IBL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
|
1,620,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,620,772 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
160,828 |
|
|
|
268,326 |
|
|
|
373,107 |
|
|
|
509,879 |
|
|
|
1,312,141 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
721,124 |
|
|
|
17,932 |
|
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
40,530 |
|
|
|
793,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502,724 |
|
|
|
286,258 |
|
|
|
386,649 |
|
|
|
550,409 |
|
|
|
3,726,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Gap |
|
$ |
(323,787 |
) |
|
$ |
355,191 |
|
|
$ |
174,147 |
|
|
$ |
424,016 |
|
|
$ |
629,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap |
|
$ |
(323,787 |
) |
|
$ |
31,404 |
|
|
$ |
205,551 |
|
|
$ |
629,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEA/IBL (Cumulative) |
|
|
.87 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap to IEA |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cumulative twelve-month IEA to IBL ratio changed slightly to 1.17 for September 30, 2010
from 1.04 for December 31, 2009.
The allocation of non-maturity deposits to the one-month maturity category is based on the
estimated sensitivity of each product to changes in market rates. For example, if a products rate
is estimated to increase by 50% as much as the market rates, then 50% of the account balance was
placed in this category.
49
The following metrics were calculated using rate shocks, representing immediate rate changes
that move all market rates by the same amount. The variance percentages represent the change
between the net interest income or EVE calculated under the particular rate shock versus the net
interest income or EVE that was calculated assuming market rates as of September 30, 2010.
The following table presents an analysis of the potential sensitivity of the Corporations net
interest income and EVE to changes in interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
ALCO |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Guidelines |
Net interest income change (12 months): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 basis points |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
+ 100 basis points |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
- 100 basis points |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic value of equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 basis points |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
+ 100 basis points |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
- 100 basis points |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
The Corporation has a neutral interest rate risk position. In the short term, rising rates
have a modest positive effect on net interest income. The Corporation has maintained a relatively
stable net interest margin despite the recent market rate volatility.
During 2010, the ALCO utilized several strategies to maintain the Corporations interest rate
risk position at a relatively neutral level. For example, the Corporation successfully achieved
growth in longer-term certificates of deposit. On the lending side, the Corporation regularly
sells long-term fixed-rate residential mortgages to the secondary market and has been successful in
the origination of consumer and commercial loans with short-term repricing characteristics. Total
variable and adjustable-rate loans increased from 57.4% of total loans as of December 31, 2009 to
57.8% of total loans as of September 30, 2010. The investment portfolio is used, in part, to
improve the Corporations interest rate risk position. The average life of the investment
portfolio is relatively low at 2.3 years and 2.6 years at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Finally, the Corporation has made use of interest rate swaps to lessen its interest
rate risk position. The $89.2 million in notional swap principal originated in 2010 contributed to
the increase in adjustable loans and has brought the total to $457.0 million under this program.
For additional information regarding interest rate swaps, see the Derivative Instruments footnote.
OCC Bulletin 2000-16 mandates that banks have their asset/liability models independently
validated on a periodic basis. The Corporations Asset/Liability Management Policy states that the
model will be validated at least every three years. A leading asset/liability consulting firm
issued a report as of December 31, 2009 after conducting a validation of the model for FNBPA. The
model was given an Excellent rating, which according to the consultant, indicates that the
overall model implementation meets FNBPAs earnings performance assessment and interest rate risk
analysis needs.
However, the Corporation recognizes that all asset/liability models have some inherent
shortcomings. Furthermore, asset/liability models require certain assumptions to be made, such as
prepayment rates on interest earning assets and pricing impact on non-maturity deposits, which may
differ from actual experience. These business assumptions are based upon the Corporations
experience, business plans and available industry data. While management believes such assumptions
to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that modeled results will be achieved.
RISK MANAGEMENT
The key to effective risk management is to be proactive in identifying, measuring, evaluating
and monitoring risk on an ongoing basis. Risk management practices support decision-making,
improve the success rate for new initiatives, and strengthen the markets confidence in the
Corporation and its affiliates.
The Corporation supports its risk management process through a governance structure involving
its Board of Directors and senior management. The Corporations Risk Committee, which is comprised
of various members of the
50
Board of Directors, helps insure that management executes business decisions within the
Corporations desired risk profile. The Risk Committee has the following key roles:
|
|
|
facilitate the identification, assessment and monitoring of risk across the
Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
provide support and oversight to the Corporations businesses; and |
|
|
|
|
identify and implement risk management best practices, as appropriate. |
FNBPA has a Risk Management Committee comprised of senior management to provide
regularoversight of specific areas of risk with respect to the level of risk and risk management
structure. FNBPAs Risk Management Committee reports on a regular basis to the Corporations Risk
Committee regarding the enterprise risk profile of the Corporation and other relevant risk
management issues.
The Corporations audit function performs an independent assessment of the internal control
environment. Moreover, the Corporations audit function plays a critical role in risk management,
testing the operation of internal control systems and reporting findings to management and to the
Corporations Audit Committee. Both the Corporations Risk Committee and FNBPAs Risk Management
Committee regularly assess the Corporations enterprise-wide risk profile and provide guidance on
actions needed to address key risk issues.
DEPOSITS AND TREASURY MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS
Following is a summary of deposits and treasury management accounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2010 |
|
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
1,103,393 |
|
|
$ |
992,298 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
3,307,698 |
|
|
|
3,182,909 |
|
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits |
|
|
2,186,737 |
|
|
|
2,205,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
6,597,828 |
|
|
|
6,380,223 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
687,139 |
|
|
|
536,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and treasury management accounts |
|
$ |
7,284,967 |
|
|
$ |
6,917,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and treasury management accounts increased by $368.0 million or 5.3% to $7.3
billion at September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of an increase
in transaction accounts, which are comprised of non-interest bearing, savings and NOW accounts
(which includes money market deposit accounts) and treasury management accounts. The increase in
transaction accounts is a result of the Corporations ability to capitalize on competitor
disruption in the marketplace, with ongoing marketing campaigns designed to attract new customers
to the Corporations local approach to banking.
LOANS
The loan portfolio consists principally of loans to individuals and small- and medium-sized
businesses within the Corporations primary market area of Pennsylvania and northeastern Ohio. The
portfolio also consists of commercial loans in Florida, which totaled $213.4 million or 3.6% of
total loans as of September 30, 2010 compared to $243.9 million or 4.2% of total loans as of
December 31, 2009. In addition, the portfolio contains consumer finance loans to individuals in
Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee, which totaled $161.5 million or 2.7% of total loans as of
September 30, 2010 compared to $162.0 million or 2.8% of total loans as of December 31, 2009.
51
Following is a summary of loans, net of unearned income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
3,299,230 |
|
|
$ |
3,234,738 |
|
Direct installment |
|
|
994,614 |
|
|
|
985,746 |
|
Residential mortgages |
|
|
612,484 |
|
|
|
605,219 |
|
Indirect installment |
|
|
519,366 |
|
|
|
527,818 |
|
Consumer lines of credit |
|
|
473,606 |
|
|
|
408,469 |
|
Other |
|
|
105,277 |
|
|
|
87,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,004,577 |
|
|
$ |
5,849,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial is comprised of both commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial
loans. Direct installment is comprised of fixed-rate, closed-end consumer loans for personal,
family or household use, such as home equity loans and automobile loans. Residential mortgages
consist of conventional mortgage loans for non-commercial properties. Indirect installment is
comprised of loans written by third parties, primarily automobile loans. Consumer lines of credit
includes home equity lines of credit (HELOC) and consumer lines of credit that are either unsecured
or secured by collateral other than home equity. Other is primarily comprised of commercial
leases, mezzanine loans and student loans.
Unearned income on loans was $40.3 million and $38.2 million at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
Total loans increased $155.2 million or 2.7% to $6.0 billion at September 30, 2010 compared to
$5.8 billion at December 31, 2009. The majority of the increase was due to solid commercial loan
growth, although total consumer loans also increased.
The composition of the Corporations commercial loan portfolio in Florida was comprised of the
following as of September 30, 2010: unimproved residential land (14.0%), unimproved commercial
land (19.9%), improved land (3.3%), income producing commercial real estate (44.2%), residential
construction (5.3%), commercial construction (10.8%), commercial and industrial (1.0%) and
owner-occupied (1.5%). Unimproved commercial land, residential construction and commercial
construction all experienced decreases from December 31, 2009, while income producing commercial
real estate increased from that same period after an $8.1 million residential construction loan and
an $8.5 million commercial construction loan were both reclassified to the income producing segment
after the construction phases were completed and the properties began to lease. All other
categories remained generally consistent with the composition at December 31, 2009. The weighted
average loan-to-value ratio for this portfolio was 79.6% as of September 30, 2010.
The majority of the Corporations loan portfolio consists of commercial loans, which is
comprised of both commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, commercial real estate loans were $2.1 billion at each
date, or 34.3% and 35.4% of total loans, respectively. Approximately 46.0% of the commercial real
estate loans are owner-occupied, while the remaining 54.0% are non-owner-occupied. As of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Corporation had commercial construction loans of $209.9 million
and $184.1 million, respectively, representing 3.5% and 3.1% of total loans, respectively.
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and restructured loans. Non-accrual loans
represent loans for which interest accruals have been discontinued. Restructured loans are loans in
which the borrower has been granted a concession on the interest rate or the original repayment
terms due to financial distress. Non-performing assets also include debt securities on which OTTI
has been taken in the current or prior periods.
The Corporation discontinues interest accruals when principal or interest is due and has
remained unpaid for 90 to 180 days depending on the loan type. When a loan is placed on
non-accrual status, all unpaid interest is reversed. Non-accrual loans may not be restored to
accrual status until all delinquent principal and interest has been paid and the ultimate
collectibility of the remaining principal and interest is reasonably assured.
52
Non-performing loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the Corporations
loan review and work-out process. The potential risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by
comparing the loan balance to the fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of
projected future cash flows. Losses on non-accrual and restructured loans are recognized when
appropriate.
Following is a summary of non-performing assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
135,661 |
|
|
$ |
133,891 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
18,735 |
|
|
|
11,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
154,396 |
|
|
|
145,515 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
32,345 |
|
|
|
21,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and OREO |
|
|
186,741 |
|
|
|
166,882 |
|
Non-performing investments |
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
191,904 |
|
|
$ |
171,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset quality ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
Non-performing loans + OREO as a percent of total loans + OREO |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
1.97 |
% |
During the first nine months of 2010, non-performing loans and OREO increased $19.9 million
from $166.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $186.7 million at September 30, 2010. This increase in
non-performing loans and OREO reflects a $7.1 million increase in restructured loans primarily
relating to the Corporations Pennsylvania portfolio, and an $11.0 million increase in OREO,
primarily relating to the Corporations Florida portfolio. The restructured loans have increased
primarily due to residential loans to help homeowners retain their residences. Additionally, total
non-accrual loans increased $1.8 million for the same nine month period, as non-accrual loans
relating to the Corporations Florida loan portfolio decreased $0.5 million and non-accrual loans
for Regency decreased $0.2 million, partially offset by an increase of $2.5 million in non-accrual
loans associated with the Corporations Pennsylvania loan portfolio. During the quarter, a $20.0
million commercial relationship in the Corporations Florida portfolio migrated to non-accrual
status, which was somewhat offset by the partial charge down and subsequent transfer to OREO of a
$13.6 million loan also in the Florida portfolio.
Following is a summary of loans 90 days or more past due on which interest accruals continue
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due |
|
$ |
9,194 |
|
|
$ |
12,471 |
|
As a percentage of total loans |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
Following is a summary of information pertaining to loans considered to be impaired (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Impaired loans with an allocated allowance |
|
$ |
54,304 |
|
|
$ |
38,608 |
|
Impaired loans without an allocated allowance |
|
|
74,263 |
|
|
|
91,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
128,567 |
|
|
$ |
130,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated allowance on impaired loans |
|
$ |
12,949 |
|
|
$ |
10,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of the loans deemed impaired were evaluated using the fair value of the
collateral as the measurement method. The decline in impaired loans from December 31, 2009 to
September 30, 2010 was primarily due to a combination of transfers to OREO, payoffs and the return
of a commercial relationship to accruing status.
53
The following tables provide additional information relating to non-performing loans for the
Corporations loan portfolios (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNBPA (PA) |
|
FNBPA (FL) |
|
Regency |
|
Total |
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
$ |
75,304 |
|
|
$ |
71,210 |
|
|
$ |
7,882 |
|
|
$ |
154,396 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
21,548 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
32,345 |
|
Total past due loans |
|
|
39,853 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
4,589 |
|
|
|
45,442 |
|
Non-performing loans/total loans |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
33.36 |
% |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
Non-performing loans + OREO/
total loans + OREO |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
39.47 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
$ |
66,160 |
|
|
$ |
71,737 |
|
|
$ |
7,618 |
|
|
$ |
145,515 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
|
10,341 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
21,367 |
|
Total past due loans |
|
|
52,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,416 |
|
|
|
57,909 |
|
Non-performing loans/total loans |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
29.41 |
% |
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
Non-performing loans + OREO/
total loans + OREO |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
32.28 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
FNBPA (PA) reflects FNBPAs total portfolio excluding the Florida portfolio which is presented
separately.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio at a specific point in time. This estimate includes losses
associated with specifically identified loans, as well as estimated probable credit losses inherent
in the remainder of the loan portfolio. Additions are made to the allowance through both periodic
provisions charged to income and recoveries of losses previously incurred. Reductions to the
allowance occur as loans are charged off. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance at
least quarterly, and in doing so relies on various factors including, but not limited to,
assessment of historical loss experience, delinquency and non-accrual trends, portfolio growth,
underlying collateral coverage and current economic conditions. This evaluation is subjective and
requires material estimates that may change over time.
The components of the allowance for loan losses represent estimates based upon ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies, and ASC Topic 310, Receivables. ASC Topic 450 applies to homogeneous loan pools
such as consumer installment, residential mortgages and consumer lines of credit, as well as
commercial loans that are not individually evaluated for impairment under ASC Topic 310. ASC Topic
310 is applied to commercial loans that are individually evaluated for impairment.
Under ASC Topic 310, a loan is impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is
probable that the loan will not be repaid according to its original contractual terms, including
both principal and interest. Management performs individual assessments of impaired loans to
determine the existence of loss exposure and, where applicable, the extent of loss exposure based
upon the present value of expected future cash flows available to pay the loan, or based upon the
fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs where a loan is collateral dependent.
In estimating loan loss contingencies, management considers numerous factors, including
historical charge-off rates and subsequent recoveries. Management also considers, but is not
limited to, qualitative factors that influence the Corporations credit quality, such as
delinquency and non-performing loan trends, changes in loan underwriting guidelines and credit
policies, as well as the results of internal loan reviews. Finally, management considers the
impact of changes in current local and regional economic conditions in the markets that the
Corporation serves. Assessment of relevant economic factors indicates that the Corporations
primary markets historically tend to lag the national economy, with local economies in the
Corporations primary market areas also improving or weakening, as the case may be, but at a more
measured rate than the national trends. Regional economic factors influencing managements
estimate of reserves include uncertainty of the labor markets in the regions the Corporation serves
as well as the impact of unemployment trends in these areas, which have fluctuated in response to
the recent economic cycle. Homogeneous loan pools are evaluated using similar criteria that are
based upon historical loss rates for various loan types. Historical
54
loss rates are adjusted to incorporate changes in existing conditions that may impact, both
positively or negatively, the degree to which these loss histories may vary. This determination
inherently involves a high degree of uncertainty and considers current risk factors that may not
have occurred in the Corporations historical loan loss experience.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation updated the allowance methodology to place
a greater emphasis on losses realized within the past two years. The previous methodology
emphasized a rolling 15-quarter experience method. This change did not have a material impact on
the 2009 provision and allowance, but could indicate higher provisions in future periods if higher
losses are experienced.
Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
114,040 |
|
|
$ |
99,415 |
|
|
$ |
104,655 |
|
|
$ |
104,730 |
|
Addition from acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(10,210 |
) |
|
|
(10,617 |
) |
|
|
(26,495 |
) |
|
|
(41,855 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(9,726 |
) |
|
|
(9,978 |
) |
|
|
(24,544 |
) |
|
|
(39,731 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
12,313 |
|
|
|
16,455 |
|
|
|
36,516 |
|
|
|
40,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
116,627 |
|
|
$ |
105,892 |
|
|
$ |
116,627 |
|
|
$ |
105,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
Non-performing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.54 |
% |
|
|
79.08 |
% |
During the first nine months of 2010, the Corporation reduced its Florida land-related
portfolio including OREO by $9.1 million or 8.8%, reducing total land-related exposure including
OREO to $94.1 million. In addition, the condominium portfolio including OREO stands at $3.4
million at September 30, 2010. These reductions are consistent with the Corporations objective to
reduce this exposure in the Florida portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2010 increased $10.7 million or 10.1% from
September 30, 2009 as the provision for loan losses during the 12 months ended September 30, 2010
of $62.4 million exceeded net charge-offs of $51.7 million. While there are signs of recovery from
the recession in the Corporations Pennsylvania portfolio, the duration of the slow economic
environment in the Corporations Florida portfolio continues to be a challenge. The allowance for
loan losses for the Florida portfolio was $29.1 million or 13.64% of total loans in that portfolio
at September 30, 2010 compared to $19.8 million or 8.11% of that portfolio at December 31, 2009.
The increased Florida allowance is primarily due to additional provision for the Florida
land-related portfolio, which totaled $79.4 million at September 30, 2010. Information collected
from recent reappraisals that have occurred to date in 2010 for certain properties in the Florida
portfolio along with Florida market data suggest that Florida land valuations have not yet fully
stabilized. As a result, the Corporation provided additional reserves to the Florida land
portfolio allowance, as a majority of the properties in that portfolio are scheduled to be
reappraised during the fourth quarter of 2010. The collective impact of loan migrations,
write-downs and transfers to OREO during the first nine months of 2010, as well as the additional
provisioning that occurred during that time in anticipation of the reappraisal process, all
resulted in a $10.8 million increase to the Florida land-related allowance. The allowance for the
Florida land-related portfolio at September 30, 2010 was $18.9 million or 23.76% of the
land-related portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans increased from 71.92% as
of December 31, 2009 to 75.54% as of September 30, 2010. While the allowance for loan losses
increased $12.0 million or 11.4% since December 31, 2009, non-performing loans increased $8.9
million or 6.1% over the same period.
55
The following tables provide additional information relating to the provision and allowance
for loan losses for the Corporations loan portfolios (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNBPA (PA) |
|
FNBPA (FL) |
|
Regency |
|
Total |
At or for the Three Months
Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
4,796 |
|
|
$ |
5,867 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
12,313 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
80,729 |
|
|
|
29,114 |
|
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
116,627 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
4,462 |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
9,726 |
|
Net loan charge-offs (annualized)/
average loans |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
6.59 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/total loans |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
13.64 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/
non-performing loans |
|
|
107.20 |
% |
|
|
40.88 |
% |
|
|
86.07 |
% |
|
|
75.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months
Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
10,420 |
|
|
$ |
13,463 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
|
$ |
25,924 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
78,061 |
|
|
|
19,789 |
|
|
|
6,805 |
|
|
|
104,655 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
20,301 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
27,161 |
|
Net loan charge-offs (annualized)/
average loans |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
31.25 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/total loans |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
8.11 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses/
non-performing loans |
|
|
117.99 |
% |
|
|
27.59 |
% |
|
|
89.33 |
% |
|
|
72.99 |
% |
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation had $3.9 million and $9.6 million of loans,
respectively, that were impaired loans acquired with no associated allowance for loan losses as
they were accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Receivables Loans and Debt
Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality,
liquidity, earnings performance, changing competitive conditions and economic forces. The
Corporation seeks to maintain a strong capital base to support its growth and expansion activities,
to provide stability to current operations and to promote public confidence.
The Corporation has an effective shelf registration statement filed with the SEC. Pursuant to
this registration statement, the Corporation may, from time to time, issue and sell in one or more
offerings any combination of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or TPS. As of
September 30, 2010, the Corporation has issued 24,150,000 common shares in a public equity offering
under the shelf registration statement.
On September 9, 2009, the Corporation redeemed all of the 100,000 outstanding shares of its
preferred stock originally issued to the UST in conjunction with the CPP. Between receiving the
CPP funds on January 9, 2009 and September 9, 2009, the Corporation paid the UST $3.3 million in
cash dividends. Upon redemption, the difference of $4.3 million between the preferred stock
redemption amount and the recorded amount of discount amortization was charged to retained earnings
as a non-cash deemed preferred stock dividend. This non-cash deemed preferred stock dividend had
no impact on total equity, but reduced 2009 earnings per diluted common share by $0.04. In total,
CPP costs reduced earnings per diluted common share by $0.05 during 2009.
The Corporation and FNBPA are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the federal banking agencies. Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital
adequacy require the Corporation and FNBPA to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier
1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of leverage
ratio (as defined). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory,
and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a
direct material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and
FNBPA must meet specific capital guidelines
56
that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items
as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Corporations and FNBPAs capital amounts
and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components,
risk weightings and other factors.
The Corporations management believes that, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the Corporation and FNBPA met all capital adequacy requirements to which either of them was
subject.
As of September 30, 2010, the most recent notification from the federal banking agencies
categorized the Corporation and FNBPA as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. There are no conditions or events since the notification which management
believes have changed this categorization.
Following are the capital ratios as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for the
Corporation and FNBPA (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
Actual |
|
Requirements |
|
Requirements |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
$ |
822,582 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
$ |
638,683 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
510,946 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
757,017 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
615,110 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
492,088 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
724,569 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
383,210 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
255,473 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
679,709 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
369,066 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
246,044 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
724,569 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
419,986 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
335,989 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
679,709 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
410,349 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
328,280 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
$ |
795,372 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
$ |
617,447 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
493,958 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
745,183 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
602,810 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
482,248 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
705,188 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
370,468 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
246,979 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
669,543 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
361,686 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
241,124 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
705,188 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
406,314 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
325,052 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
FNBPA |
|
|
669,543 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
395,647 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
316,517 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
REGULATORY REFORM
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act became law. The Dodd-Frank Act will have a broad impact
on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes
including, among other things,
|
|
|
enhanced authority over troubled and failing banks and their holding companies; |
|
|
|
|
increased capital and liquidity requirements; |
|
|
|
|
increased regulatory examination fees; |
|
|
|
|
increases to the assessments banks must pay the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; and |
57
|
|
|
numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and
strengthening safety and soundness for, the financial services sector. |
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a new framework for systemic risk oversight within
the financial system that will be enforced by new and existing federal regulatory agencies,
including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC. The following description briefly summarizes certain
impacts of the Dodd-Frank Act on the operations and activities, both currently and prospectively,
of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Deposit Insurance. The Dodd-Frank Act makes permanent the $250,000 deposit insurance limit for
insured deposits. Amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act also revise the assessment base
against which an insured depository institutions deposit insurance premiums paid to the FDICs
Deposit Insurance Fund, or the DIF, will be calculated. Under the amendments, the FDIC assessment
base will no longer be the institutions deposit base, but rather its average consolidated total
assets less its average equity. The Dodd-Frank Act also changes the minimum designated reserve
ratio of the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15% to 1.35% of the estimated amount of total
insured deposits, and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository
institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds by September 30, 2020. Several of
these provisions could increase the FDIC deposit insurance premiums FNBPA pays.
Interest on Demand Deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides that, effective one year after
the date of its enactment, depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposits. Although
the Corporation has not determined the ultimate impact of this aspect of the legislation, the
Corporation expects interest costs associated with demand deposits to increase.
Trust Preferred Securities. The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits bank holding companies from
including in their regulatory Tier 1 capital hybrid debt and equity securities issued on or after
May 19, 2010. Among the hybrid debt and equity securities included in this prohibition are TPS,
which the Corporation has issued in the past in order to raise additional Tier 1 capital and
otherwise improve its regulatory capital ratios. Although the Corporation may continue to include
its existing TPS as Tier 1 capital, the prohibition on the use of these securities as Tier 1
capital may limit the Corporations ability to raise capital in the future.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new, independent
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the Bureau, within the FRB. The Bureaus responsibility
is to establish,implement and enforce rules and regulations under certain federal consumer
protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and
services. The Bureau has rulemaking authority over many of the statutes that govern products and
services banks offer to consumers. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt
consumer protection laws and regulations that are more stringent than those regulations the Bureau
will promulgate and state attorneys general will have the authority to enforce consumer protection
rules the Bureau adopts against certain state-chartered institutions. Compliance with any such
new regulations established by the Bureau and/or states could reduce the Corporations revenue,
increase the its cost of operations, and could limit its ability to expand into certain products
and services.
Debit Card Interchange Fees. The Dodd-Frank Act gives the Federal Reserve the authority to
establish rules regarding interchange fees charged for electronic debit transactions by payment
card issuers having assets over $10 billion and to enforce a new statutory requirement that such
fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer. While the
Corporation would not be directly subject to these rules so long as it did not have assets in
excess of $10 billion, the Corporations activities as a debit card issuer may nevertheless be
indirectly impacted by the change in the applicable debit card market caused by these regulations,
which may lead to Corporation to match any new lower fee structure implemented by larger financial
institutions to remain competitive. Such lower fees could impact the revenue the Corporation earns
from debit interchange fees, which were equal to $3.9 million and $11.2 million, respectively, for
the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010.
Increased Capital Standards and Enhanced Supervision. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal
banking agencies to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for banks and
bank holding companies. These new standards will be no less strict than existing regulatory
capital and leverage standards applicable to insured depository institutions and may, in fact,
become higher once the agencies promulgate the new standards. Compliance
58
with heightened capital standards may reduce the Corporations ability to generate or
originate revenue-producing assets and thereby restrict revenue generation from banking and
non-banking operations.
Transactions with Affiliates. The Dodd-Frank Act enhances the requirements for certain
transactions with affiliates under Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including an
expansion of the definition of covered transactions, and an increase in the amount of time for
which collateral requirements regarding covered transactions must be maintained.
Transactions with Insiders. The Dodd-Frank Act expands insider transaction limitations
through the strengthening of loan restrictions to insiders and the expansion of the types of
transactions subject to the various limits, including derivative transactions, repurchase
agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions. The
Dodd-Frank Act also places restrictions on certain asset sales to and from an insider of an
institution, including requirements that such sales be on market terms and, in certain
circumstances, receive the approval of the institutions board of directors.
Enhanced Lending Limits. The Dodd-Frank Act strengthens the existing limits on a depository
institutions credit exposure to one borrower. Federal banking law currently limits a national
banks ability to extend credit to one person or group of related persons to an amount that does
not exceed certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act expands the scope of these restrictions to
include credit exposure arising from derivative transactions, repurchase agreements and securities
lending and borrowing transactions. It also will eventually prohibit state-chartered banks from
engaging in derivative transactions unless the state lending limit laws take into account credit
exposure to such transactions.
Corporate Governance. The Dodd-Frank Act addresses many corporate governance and executive
compensation matters that will affect most U.S. publicly traded companies, including the
Corporation. The Dodd-Frank Act:
|
|
|
grants shareholders of U.S. publicly traded companies an advisory vote on executive
compensation; |
|
|
|
|
enhances independence requirements for compensation committee members; |
|
|
|
|
requires companies listed on national securities exchanges to adopt clawback policies for
incentive-based compensation plans applicable to executive officers; and |
|
|
|
|
provides the SEC with authority to adopt proxy access rules that would allow shareholders
of publicly traded companies to nominate candidates for election as directors and requires
such companies to include such nominees in its proxy materials. |
Many of the requirements the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes will be implemented over time and most
will be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. While the
Corporations current assessment is that the Dodd-Frank Act will not have a material effect on the
Corporation, given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the federal banking agencies
may implement the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, the full extent of the impact such requirements
may have on the Corporations operations is unclear at this time. The changes resulting from the
Dodd-Frank Act may impact the Corporations profitability, require changes to certain of the
Corporations business practices, including limitations on fee income opportunities, impose more
stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements upon the Corporation or otherwise adversely
affect the Corporations business. These changes may also require the Corporation to invest
significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply
with new statutory and regulatory requirements. While the Corporation cannot predict what effect
any presently contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations
would have on the Corporation, it does not believe that these changes will have a material adverse
effect on the Corporation.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The information called for by this item is provided under the caption Market Risk in Item 2 -
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There are
no material changes in the information provided under Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk included in the Corporations 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K as
filed with the SEC.
59
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. The Corporations management, with the
participation of the Corporations principal executive and financial officers, evaluated the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, the Corporations management, including the Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of such date at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Corporations management, including its principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS. The Corporations management, including the CEO
and the CFO, does not expect that the Corporations disclosure controls and internal controls will
prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation
have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
In addition, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people or by management override of the controls.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS. The CEO and the CFO have evaluated the changes to the
Corporations internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Corporations
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, as required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a15(e) and
15d15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have concluded that there
were no such changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Corporations internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending and threatened legal
proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. These actions
include claims brought against the Corporation and its subsidiaries where the Corporation or a
subsidiary acted as one or more of the following: a depository bank, lender, underwriter,
fiduciary, financial advisor, broker or was engaged in other business activities. Although the
ultimate outcome for any asserted claim cannot be predicted with certainty, the Corporation
believes that it and its subsidiaries have valid defenses for all asserted claims. Reserves are
established for legal claims when losses associated with the claims are judged to be probable and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and
established reserves, the Corporation does not anticipate, at the present time, that the aggregate
liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial position. However, the Corporation cannot determine whether
or not any claims asserted against it will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
results of operations in any future reporting period.
60
There are no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Corporations
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC, other than as set forth below.
On July 21,2010, the Dodd-Frank Act became law. The Dodd-Frank Act will have a broad impact on
the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes. Many of
the requirements the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes will be implemented over time and most will be
subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty
associated with the manner in which the federal banking agencies may implement the provisions of
the Dodd-Frank Act, the full extent of the impact such requirements may have on the Corporations
operations is unclear at this time. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the
Corporations profitability, require changes to certain of the Corporations business practices,
impose more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements upon the Corporation or
otherwise adversely affect the Corporations business. These changes may also require the
Corporation to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any
changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements. The Corporation cannot
predict what effect any presently contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or
their interpretations would have on the Corporation. For further discussion of the Dodd-Frank Act
and its potential impact on the Corporation, please see information provided under the caption
Regulatory Reform in Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
NONE
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
NONE
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
NONE
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from F.N.B. Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets,
(ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text. * |
|
|
|
* |
|
This information is deemed furnished, not filed. |
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation
|
|
Dated: November 5, 2010 |
/s/Stephen J. Gurgovits
|
|
|
Stephen J. Gurgovits |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 5, 2010 |
/s/Vincent J. Calabrese
|
|
|
Vincent J. Calabrese |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 5, 2010 |
/s/Timothy G. Rubritz
|
|
|
Timothy G. Rubritz |
|
|
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
62