Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-31924
NELNET, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
NEBRASKA
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
84-0748903
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
121 SOUTH 13TH STREET, SUITE 201
LINCOLN, NEBRASKA
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
68508
(Zip Code) |
(402) 458-2370
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 31, 2009, there were 38,325,862 and 11,495,377 shares of Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding, respectively (excluding
11,317,364 shares of Class A Common Stock held by a wholly owned subsidiary).
NELNET, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
June 30, 2009
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
NELNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses of
$50,000 and $50,922, respectively) |
|
$ |
23,889,571 |
|
|
|
25,413,008 |
|
Student loans receivable held for sale |
|
|
1,749,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents not held at a related party |
|
|
14,171 |
|
|
|
13,129 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents held at a related party |
|
|
352,656 |
|
|
|
176,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
366,827 |
|
|
|
189,847 |
|
Restricted cash and investments |
|
|
1,082,480 |
|
|
|
997,272 |
|
Restricted cash due to customers |
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
385,158 |
|
|
|
471,878 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,273 and $1,005, respectively) |
|
|
52,106 |
|
|
|
42,088 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
175,178 |
|
|
|
175,178 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
65,115 |
|
|
|
77,054 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
31,541 |
|
|
|
38,747 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
103,429 |
|
|
|
113,666 |
|
Fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
168,720 |
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
28,110,542 |
|
|
|
27,854,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes payable |
|
$ |
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
26,787,959 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
34,911 |
|
|
|
81,576 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
176,390 |
|
|
|
179,336 |
|
Due to customers |
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
Fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
27,429,355 |
|
|
|
27,211,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares;
no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, $0.01 par value. Authorized 600,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 38,325,492 shares as of June 30,
2009 and 37,794,067 shares as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Class B, convertible, $0.01 par value. Authorized 60,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 11,495,377 shares as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
107,959 |
|
|
|
103,762 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
574,179 |
|
|
|
540,521 |
|
Employee notes receivable |
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
(1,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
681,187 |
|
|
|
643,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
28,110,542 |
|
|
|
27,854,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
NELNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan interest |
|
$ |
160,413 |
|
|
|
296,686 |
|
|
|
331,332 |
|
|
|
626,672 |
|
Investment interest |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
20,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
163,189 |
|
|
|
305,802 |
|
|
|
338,199 |
|
|
|
647,468 |
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on bonds and notes payable |
|
|
106,082 |
|
|
|
232,464 |
|
|
|
252,584 |
|
|
|
557,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
57,107 |
|
|
|
73,338 |
|
|
|
85,615 |
|
|
|
89,863 |
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
49,107 |
|
|
|
67,338 |
|
|
|
70,115 |
|
|
|
78,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
28,803 |
|
|
|
23,821 |
|
|
|
55,274 |
|
|
|
48,482 |
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
14,183 |
|
Other income |
|
|
11,527 |
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
|
|
28,389 |
|
|
|
12,379 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments and derivative
settlements, net |
|
|
(24,478 |
) |
|
|
20,192 |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
62,370 |
|
|
|
92,503 |
|
|
|
174,989 |
|
|
|
108,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
40,180 |
|
|
|
43,549 |
|
|
|
78,406 |
|
|
|
97,392 |
|
Other operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,527 |
|
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
|
19,610 |
|
|
|
21,437 |
|
Professional and other services |
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
8,029 |
|
|
|
13,798 |
|
|
|
15,224 |
|
Occupancy and communications |
|
|
5,588 |
|
|
|
4,914 |
|
|
|
10,942 |
|
|
|
10,755 |
|
Trustee and other debt related fees |
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
4,854 |
|
Postage and distribution |
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
|
6,115 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
3,994 |
|
Impairment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,834 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,544 |
|
|
|
9,028 |
|
|
|
17,348 |
|
|
|
17,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses |
|
|
57,176 |
|
|
|
54,373 |
|
|
|
111,521 |
|
|
|
129,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
97,356 |
|
|
|
97,922 |
|
|
|
189,927 |
|
|
|
226,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
14,121 |
|
|
|
61,919 |
|
|
|
55,177 |
|
|
|
(39,277 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(5,918 |
) |
|
|
(19,195 |
) |
|
|
(21,519 |
) |
|
|
12,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
|
42,724 |
|
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
(27,101 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,203 |
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
(0.55 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
NELNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
Common stock shares |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
common |
|
|
common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
notes |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
receivable |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,912,773 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
97,875 |
|
|
|
442,034 |
|
|
|
(2,296 |
) |
|
|
538,107 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
|
Compensation expense for stock based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
Reduction of employee stock notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,952,246 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
99,854 |
|
|
|
485,739 |
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
584,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,276,870 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
106,678 |
|
|
|
565,976 |
|
|
|
(1,550 |
) |
|
|
671,602 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953 |
|
Compensation expense for stock based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Reduction of employee stock notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,325,492 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
107,959 |
|
|
|
574,179 |
|
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
681,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,980,617 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
96,185 |
|
|
|
515,317 |
|
|
|
(3,118 |
) |
|
|
608,879 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
Cash dividend on Class A and Class B
common stock $0.07 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,458 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
Compensation expense for stock based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
Reduction of employee stock notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,952,246 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
99,854 |
|
|
|
485,739 |
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
584,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,794,067 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
103,762 |
|
|
|
540,521 |
|
|
|
(1,550 |
) |
|
|
643,226 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,658 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,303 |
|
Compensation expense for stock based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
Reduction of employee stock notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,325,492 |
|
|
|
11,495,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
107,959 |
|
|
|
574,179 |
|
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
681,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
NELNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
33,658 |
|
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
(27,101 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including loan premiums and deferred origination costs |
|
|
57,890 |
|
|
|
74,312 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Impairment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,834 |
|
Derivative market value adjustment |
|
|
22,270 |
|
|
|
(47,462 |
) |
Foreign currency transaction adjustment |
|
|
16,623 |
|
|
|
88,530 |
|
Change in
value of put options issued in business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
538 |
|
Proceeds to terminate and/or amend derivative instruments |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
Payments to terminate and/or amend derivative instruments |
|
|
(11,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain from purchase of debt |
|
|
(13,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
47,426 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
4,372 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(26,864 |
) |
|
|
(24,237 |
) |
Other non-cash items |
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
86,720 |
|
|
|
91,778 |
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
(10,018 |
) |
|
|
3,098 |
|
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
10,036 |
|
|
|
9,419 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(46,665 |
) |
|
|
(42,950 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
(28,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
flows from operating activities continuing operations |
|
|
156,016 |
|
|
|
187,097 |
|
Net cash
flows from operating activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
156,016 |
|
|
|
187,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations, purchases, and consolidations of student loans, including loan premiums
and deferred origination costs |
|
|
(1,467,312 |
) |
|
|
(1,480,305 |
) |
Purchases of student loans, including loan premiums, from a related party |
|
|
(20,392 |
) |
|
|
(212,888 |
) |
Net proceeds from student loan repayments, claims, capitalized interest, participations, and other |
|
|
1,177,455 |
|
|
|
1,061,510 |
|
Proceeds from sale of student loans |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
1,267,826 |
|
Proceeds from sale of student loans to a related party |
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(3,721 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash and investments, net |
|
|
(85,208 |
) |
|
|
(80,066 |
) |
Purchases of equity method investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,988 |
) |
Business acquisition contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
flows from investing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(355,527 |
) |
|
|
531,368 |
|
Net cash
flows from investing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(355,527 |
) |
|
|
531,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on bonds and notes payable |
|
|
(2,184,109 |
) |
|
|
(5,444,408 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of bonds and notes payable |
|
|
2,584,680 |
|
|
|
4,761,143 |
|
(Payments) proceeds from issuance of notes payable due to a related party, net |
|
|
(21,520 |
) |
|
|
9,269 |
|
Payments of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(2,830 |
) |
|
|
(14,634 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,458 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(667 |
) |
Payments received on employee stock notes receivable |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
flows from financing activities continuing operations |
|
|
376,491 |
|
|
|
(691,757 |
) |
Net cash
flows from financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
376,491 |
|
|
|
(691,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
176,980 |
|
|
|
26,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
189,847 |
|
|
|
111,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
366,827 |
|
|
|
138,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
294,041 |
|
|
|
589,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
30,299 |
|
|
|
14,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
NELNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Information as of June 30, 2009 and for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts, unless otherwise noted)
1. Basis of Financial Reporting
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Nelnet, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of June 30, 2009 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have
been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and, in the opinion of the Companys management, the unaudited consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of results of operations for the interim periods presented. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2009. The unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain amounts from 2008 have been reclassified
to conform to the current period presentation. Management has evaluated subsequent events, and the
impact on the reported results and disclosures, through August 10, 2009, which is the date these
financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
2. Restructuring Charge
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted a plan to further streamline its operations
by continuing to reduce its geographic footprint and consolidate servicing operations and related
support services.
Management has developed a restructuring plan that will result in lower costs and provide enhanced
synergies through cross training, career development, and simplified communications. The Company
will simplify its operating structure to leverage its larger facilities and technology by closing
certain offices and downsizing its presence in certain geographic locations. Approximately 300
associates will be impacted by this restructuring plan. However, the majority of these functions
will be relocated to the Companys Lincoln headquarters and Denver offices. Implementation of the
plan began immediately and is expected to be substantially complete during the second quarter of
2010.
The Company estimates that the charge to earnings associated with this restructuring plan will be
fully recognized by December 31, 2010 and will total approximately $9.2 million, consisting of
approximately $5.7 million in severance costs and approximately $3.5 million in contract
terminations, of which approximately $5.4 million are expected to be recognized in 2009. During
the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded charges of $2.8 million. Selected
information relating to the restructuring charge follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
termination |
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
terminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs recognized during the
three month period
ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,482 |
(a) |
|
|
1,291 |
(b) |
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Employee termination benefits are included in salaries and benefits in the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(b) |
|
Lease termination costs are included in occupancy and communications in the consolidated statements of operations. |
6
Selected information relating to the restructuring charge by operating segment and Corporate
Activity and Overhead follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
month period ended |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
accrual as of |
|
Operating segment |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
payments |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing |
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition Payment Processing and
Campus Commerce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and Technical Services |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Generation and Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Activity and Overhead |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,773 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
costs recognized |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
during the three |
|
|
restructuring costs |
|
|
|
total restructuring |
|
|
month period ended |
|
|
expected to be |
|
Operating segment |
|
costs |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing |
|
$ |
6,752 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
4,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition Payment Processing and
Campus Commerce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and Technical Services |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Generation and Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Activity and Overhead |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,236 |
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
6,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
In 2007 and 2008, the Company recorded restructuring charges related to certain legislative
events and disruptions in the capital markets. As a result of the restructurings,
the Company incurred expenses related to severance, contract terminations, and impairment of
long-lived assets. These restructuring plans were completed by management in December 2007 and
January 2008. However, an accrual related to certain lease terminations remains. Information
relating to such accrual follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual as of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
from initial estimate of charges (a) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Additional expense related to this adjustment is included in
occupancy and communications in the consolidated
statements of operations. |
3. Student Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses
Student loans consist of federally insured student loans, non-federally insured student loans, and
student loan participations. If the Company has the ability and intent to hold loans for the
foreseeable future, such loans are held for investment and, carried at amortized cost.
Amortized cost includes the unamortized premiums and capitalized origination costs and fees, all of
which are amortized to interest income. Loans which are held-for-investment also have an allowance
for loan loss as needed. Any loans the Company has the ability and intent to sell are classified as
held for sale and are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Loans which are held-for-sale do
not have the associated premium and origination costs and fees amortized into interest income and
there is also no related allowance for loan losses.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $1.7 billion of Federal Family Education Loan Program
(FFELP) loans classified as held for sale. These loans are funded using the Department of
Educations Loan Participation Program (the Participation Program) and are expected to be sold to
the Department of Education (the Department) under the Departments Loan Purchase Commitment
Program (the Purchase Program) during 2009. Under the Purchase Program, the Department will
purchase loans at a price equal to the sum of (i) par value, (ii) accrued interest, (iii) the one
percent origination fee paid to the Department, and (iv) a fixed amount of $75 per loan. Upon
selling the $1.7 billion in loans held for sale, the Company expects to recognize a gain of
approximately $31 million to $34 million. The Company plans to continue to use the Participation
and Purchase Programs to fund loans originated through the 2009-2010 academic year (see note 4 for
additional information related to the Departments Participation and Purchase Programs).
Student loans receivable consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federally insured loans held-for-investment |
|
$ |
23,367,777 |
|
|
|
24,787,941 |
|
Federally insured loans held-for-sale |
|
|
1,731,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-federally insured loans |
|
|
200,722 |
|
|
|
273,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,299,539 |
|
|
|
25,061,049 |
|
Unamortized loan premiums and deferred origination costs held-for-investment |
|
|
371,072 |
|
|
|
402,881 |
|
Unamortized loan premiums and deferred origination costs held-for-sale |
|
|
18,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses federally insured loans (held-for-investment) |
|
|
(28,093 |
) |
|
|
(25,577 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses non-federally insured loans |
|
|
(21,907 |
) |
|
|
(25,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,638,861 |
|
|
|
25,413,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for federally insured loans held-for-investment as a percentage of such loans |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
Allowance for non-federally insured loans as a percentage of such loans |
|
|
10.91 |
% |
|
|
9.28 |
% |
Total allowance as a percentage of the ending balance of total loans (excluding loans held-for-sale) |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
8
The Company has provided for an allowance for loan losses related to its student loan
portfolio. Activity in the allowance for loan losses is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
48,497 |
|
|
|
46,137 |
|
|
|
50,922 |
|
|
|
45,592 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Loans charged off, net
of recoveries |
|
|
(5,197 |
) |
|
|
(4,228 |
) |
|
|
(9,102 |
) |
|
|
(7,933 |
) |
Sale of loans |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,320 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
47,909 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
47,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Sales
During 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company sold federally insured student
loans to third parties in order to reduce the amount of student loans remaining under the Companys
multi-year committed financing facility for FFELP loans, which contains certain equity support
provisions and has an expiration date in May 2010 (see note 4 for additional information related to
the FFELP warehouse facility).
On March 31, 2008, the Company sold $857.8 million (par value) of federally insured student loans
resulting in the recognition of a loss of $30.4 million. In addition, on April 8, 2008, the
Company sold $428.6 million (par value) of federally insured student loans. The portfolio of
student loans sold on April 8, 2008 was presented as held for sale on the March 31, 2008
consolidated balance sheet and was valued at the lower of cost or fair value. The Company
recognized a loss of $17.1 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2008 as a result
of marking these loans to fair value.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company sold $20.0 million (par value) and
$40.0 million (par value), respectively, of federally insured student loans to Union Bank & Trust
Company (Union Bank), an entity under common control with the Company, resulting in the
recognition of losses of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
In addition, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company participated $14.5
million and $65.0 million, respectively, of non-federally insured loans to third parties. Loans
participated under these agreements qualify as sales pursuant to the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS No. 140). Accordingly, the
participation interests sold are not included on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The
loss on the sale of these loans was not material. Per the terms of the servicing agreements, the
Companys servicing operations are obligated to repurchase loans subject to the participation
interests when such loans become 60 or 90 days delinquent. The activity in the accrual account
related to this repurchase obligation, which is included in other liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet, is detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for repurchase of delinquent loans (a) |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The reserve for repurchase of loans is included in other under other operating expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
9
4. Bonds and Notes Payable
The following tables summarize outstanding bonds and notes payable by type of instrument:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
range |
|
Final maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate bonds and notes (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes based on indices |
|
$ |
20,063,227 |
|
|
0.61% 6.90% |
|
09/25/13 06/25/41 |
Bonds and notes based on auction or remarketing |
|
|
2,606,740 |
|
|
0.46% 2.96% |
|
11/01/09 07/01/43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable-rate bonds and notes |
|
|
22,669,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper FFELP facility (b) |
|
|
420,936 |
|
|
0.32% 1.13% |
|
05/09/10 |
Fixed-rate bonds and notes (a) |
|
|
188,797 |
|
|
5.40% 6.50% |
|
11/01/09 05/01/29 |
Unsecured fixed rate debt |
|
|
402,864 |
|
|
5.125% and 7.40% |
|
06/01/10 and 09/15/61 |
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
691,500 |
|
|
0.79% 0.85% |
|
05/08/12 |
Department of Education Participation |
|
|
1,741,481 |
|
|
1.24% |
|
09/30/09 |
Department of Education Conduit |
|
|
1,023,600 |
|
|
0.52% |
|
05/08/14 |
Other borrowings |
|
|
30,428 |
|
|
0.32% 5.10% |
|
01/01/10 11/01/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
range |
|
|
Final maturity |
|
Variable-rate bonds and notes (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes based on indices |
|
$ |
20,509,073 |
|
|
|
0.75% 5.02% |
|
|
|
09/25/13 06/25/41 |
|
Bonds and notes based on auction or remarketing |
|
|
2,713,285 |
|
|
|
0.00% 6.00% |
|
|
|
11/01/09 07/01/43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable-rate bonds and notes |
|
|
23,222,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper FFELP facility (b) |
|
|
1,445,327 |
|
|
|
1.32% 2.94% |
|
|
|
05/09/10 |
|
Commercial paper private loan facility (b) |
|
|
95,020 |
|
|
|
2.49% |
|
|
|
03/14/09 |
|
Fixed-rate bonds and notes (a) |
|
|
202,096 |
|
|
|
5.30% 6.68% |
|
|
|
11/01/09 05/01/29 |
|
Unsecured fixed rate debt |
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
5.125% and 7.40% |
|
|
|
06/01/10 and 09/15/61 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
691,500 |
|
|
|
0.98% 2.41% |
|
|
|
05/08/12 |
|
Department of Education Participation |
|
|
622,170 |
|
|
|
3.37% |
|
|
|
09/30/09 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
34,488 |
|
|
|
1.25% 5.47% |
|
|
|
05/22/09 11/01/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,787,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Issued in asset-backed securitizations |
|
(b) |
|
Loan warehouse facilities |
Secured Financing Transactions
The Company has historically relied upon secured financing vehicles as its most significant source
of funding for student loans. The net cash flow the Company receives from the securitized student
loans generally represents the excess amounts, if any, generated by the underlying student loans
over the amounts required to be paid to the bondholders, after deducting servicing fees and any
other expenses relating to the securitizations. The Companys rights to cash flow from securitized
student loans are subordinate to bondholder interests and may fail to generate any cash flow beyond
what is due to bondholders. The Companys secured financing vehicles are loan warehouse
facilities, asset-backed securitizations, and the governments Participation and Conduit Programs
(as described below).
Most of the bonds and notes payable are primarily secured by the student loans receivable, related
accrued interest, and by the amounts on deposit in the accounts established under the respective
bond resolutions or financing agreements. The student loan interest margin notes, included in fixed
rate bonds and notes in the above tables, are secured by the rights to residual cash flows from
certain variable rate bonds and notes and fixed rate notes. Certain variable rate bonds and notes
and fixed rate bonds are secured by financial guaranty insurance policies or a letter of credit and
reimbursement agreement issued by Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation, Ambac Assurance
Corporation, and State Street.
10
On July 31, 2008, the Company did not renew its liquidity provisions on its FFELP loan warehouse
facility. Accordingly, the facility became a term facility and no new loan originations could be
funded with this facility. In August 2008, the Company began to fund FFELP student loan
originations for the 2008-2009 academic year pursuant to the Departments Participation Program and
an existing participation agreement with Union Bank. In May 2009, the Company began to fund FFELP
loans pursuant to the Departments program under which it finances eligible FFELP Stafford and PLUS
loans in a conduit vehicle established to provide funding for student lenders (the Conduit
Program).
Loan warehouse facilities
Student loan warehousing has historically allowed the Company to buy and manage student loans prior
to transferring them into more permanent financing arrangements. To support its funding needs on a
short-term basis, the Company historically relied upon a multi-year committed facility for FFELP
loans.
FFELP Warehouse Facility
The Companys multi-year committed facility for FFELP loans terminates in May 2010 and was
supported by 364-day liquidity which was up for renewal on May 9, 2008. The Company obtained an
extension on this renewal until July 31, 2008. On July 31, 2008, the Company did not renew the
liquidity provisions of this facility. Accordingly, as of July 31, 2008, the facility became a
term facility with a final maturity date of May 9, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement,
since liquidity was not renewed, the Companys cost of financing under this facility increased 10
basis points. The agreement also includes provisions which allow the banks to charge a rate equal
to LIBOR plus 128.5 basis points if they choose to finance their portion of the facility with
sources of funds other than their commercial paper conduit.
The terms and conditions of the Companys warehouse facility for FFELP loans provides for formula
based advance rates based on market conditions. While the Company does not believe that the loan
valuation formula is reflective of the actual fair value of its loans, it is subject to compliance
with such mark-to-formula provisions of the warehouse facility agreement. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company had $1.6 billion of student loans in the facility, $1.4 billion borrowed under the
facility, and $280.6 million posted as equity funding support for this facility.
On March 26, 2009, the Company completed a privately placed asset-backed securitization of $294.6
million. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the sale of these notes
and additional funds of approximately $10 million to purchase approximately $305 million of
principal and interest on student loans, which were previously financed under the Companys FFELP
warehouse facility.
In June 2009, the Company accessed the Departments Conduit Program (as further discussed below) to
fund approximately $790 million of principal and interest on student loans, which were previously
financed under the Companys FFELP warehouse facility. The Company is permitted to fund 97% of the
principal and interest expected to be capitalized. Accordingly, the Company borrowed approximately
$763 million under the Conduit Program for purposes of refinancing loans in the FFELP warehouse
facility. Excess amounts needed to fund the remaining 3% of the student loan balances were
contributed by the Company.
Removing student loans from the FFELP warehouse facility as a result of the privately placed
asset-backed securitization and Conduit Program allowed the Company to withdraw cash posted as
equity funding support for the FFELP facility. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $403.7 million
of student loans in the facility, $420.9 million borrowed under the facility, and $62.8 million
posted as equity funding support.
On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into a new FFELP warehouse facility (the
2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility). The 2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility has a maximum financing amount
of $500.0 million, with a revolving financing structure supported by 364-day liquidity provisions,
which expire on August 2, 2010. The final maturity date of the facility is August 3, 2012. In the
event the Company is unable to renew the liquidity provisions by August 2, 2010, the facility would
become a term facility at a stepped-up cost, with no additional student loans being eligible for
financing, and the Company would be required to refinance the existing loans in the facility by
August 3, 2012. The Company plans to utilize the new facility to refinance the remaining student
loans in the Companys prior FFELP warehouse facility that expires in May 2010. Refinancing these
loans will allow the Company to withdraw all remaining equity funding
support from the prior FFELP warehouse facility.
The 2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility provides for formula based advance rates depending on FFELP loan
type. The advance rates for collateral may increase or decrease based on market conditions. The
all-in pricing for the facility during the first year (including up-front fees and other costs to
structure the facility) is expected to be just below the conduits commercial paper rate plus 1%.
The facility contains financial covenants relating to levels of the Companys consolidated net
worth, ratio of adjusted EBITDA to corporate debt interest, and
unencumbered cash. Any violation of these covenants could result in a
requirement for the immediate repayment of any
outstanding borrowings under the facility. Unlike the Companys prior FFELP warehouse facility, the
new facility does not require the Company to refinance or remove a percentage
of the pledged student loan collateral on an annual basis.
11
Private Loan Warehouse Facility
On February 25, 2009, the Company paid $91.5 million on the outstanding debt of its private loan
warehouse facility with operating cash and terminated the facility. Beginning in January 2008, the
Company suspended private student loan originations.
Asset-backed securitizations
As part of the Companys issuance of asset-backed securities in March 2008 and May 2008, due to
credit market conditions when these notes were issued, the Company purchased the Class B
subordinated notes of $36 million (par value) and $41 million (par value), respectively. These
notes are not included on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. If the credit market
conditions improve, the Company anticipates selling these notes to third parties. Upon a sale to
third parties, the Company would obtain cash proceeds equal to the market value of the notes on the
date of such sale. Upon sale, these notes would be shown as bonds and notes payable on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. Unless there is a significant market improvement, the
Company believes the market value of such notes will be less than par value. The difference
between the par value and market value would be recognized by the Company as interest expense over
the life of the bonds.
Department of Educations Loan Participation and Purchase Commitment Programs
In August 2008, the Department implemented the Purchase Program and the Participation Program
pursuant to the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (ECASLA). Under the
Departments Purchase Program, the Department will purchase loans at a price equal to the sum of
(i) par value, (ii) accrued interest, (iii) the one percent origination fee paid to the Department,
and (iv) a fixed amount of $75 per loan. Under the Participation Program, the Department provides
interim short term liquidity to FFELP lenders by purchasing participation interests in pools of
FFELP loans. FFELP lenders are charged a rate of commercial paper plus 50 basis points on the
principal amount of participation interests outstanding. Loans funded under the Participation
Program for the 2008-2009 academic year must be either refinanced by the lender or sold to the
Department pursuant to the Purchase Program prior to September 30, 2009. To be eligible for
purchase or participation under the Departments programs, loans were originally limited to FFELP
Stafford or PLUS loans made for the academic year 2008-2009, first disbursed between May 1, 2008
and July 1, 2009, with eligible borrower benefits.
On October 7, 2008, legislation was enacted to extend the Departments authority to address FFELP
student loans made for the 2009-2010 academic year and allowing for the extension of the
Participation Program and Purchase Program from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010. The
Department indicated that loans for the 2008-2009 academic year which are funded under the
Departments Participation Program will need to be refinanced or sold to the Department prior to
September 30, 2009. On November 8, 2008, the Department announced the replication of the terms of
the Participation and Purchase Programs, in accordance with the October 7, 2008 legislation, which
will include FFELP student loans made for the 2009-2010 academic year.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $1.7 billion of FFELP loans funded using the Participation
Program, which are classified as held for sale on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. These
loans are expected to be sold to the Department under its Purchase
Program in 2009. The Company plans to
continue to use the Participation and Purchase Programs to fund loans through the 2009-2010
academic year.
Department of Educations Conduit Program
In January 2009, the Department published summary terms under which it will finance eligible FFELP
Stafford and PLUS loans in a conduit vehicle established to provide funding for student lenders.
Loans eligible for the Conduit Program must be first disbursed on or after October 1, 2003, but not
later than June 30, 2009, and fully disbursed before September 30, 2009, and meet certain other
requirements. The Conduit Program was launched on May 11, 2009. Funding for the Conduit Program is
provided by the capital markets at a cost based on market rates, with the Company being advanced 97
percent of the student loan face amount. The Conduit Program has a term of five years and expires
on May 8, 2014. The Student Loan Short-Term Notes (Student Loan Notes) issued by the Conduit
Program are supported by a combination of (i) notes backed by FFELP loans, (ii) the Liquidity
Agreement with the Federal Financing Bank, and (iii) the Put Agreement provided by the Department.
If the conduit does not have sufficient funds to pay all Student Loan Notes, then those Student
Loan Notes will be repaid with funds from the Federal Financing Bank. The Federal Financing Bank
will hold the notes for a short period of time and, if at the end of that time, the Student Loan
Notes still cannot be paid off, the underlying FFELP loans that serve as collateral to the Conduit
Program will be sold to the Department through the Put Agreement at a price of 97% of the face
amount of the loans. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $1.1 billion of student loans funded
through the Conduit Program and $1.0 billion borrowed under the facility.
Union Bank Participation Agreement
The Company maintains an agreement with Union Bank, as trustee for various grantor trusts, under
which Union Bank has agreed to purchase from the Company participation interests in student loans
(the FFELP Participation Agreement). The Company has the option to purchase the participation
interests from the grantor trusts at the end of a 364-day term upon termination of the
participation certificate. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $786.3 million and $548.4
million, respectively, of loans were subject to outstanding participation interests held by Union
Bank, as trustee, under this agreement. The agreement automatically renews annually and is
terminable by either party upon five business days notice. This agreement provides beneficiaries of
Union Banks grantor trusts with access to investments in interests in student
loans, while providing liquidity to the Company on a short-term basis. The Company can participate
loans to Union Bank to the extent of availability under the grantor trusts, up to $750 million or
an amount in excess of $750 million if mutually agreed to by both parties. Loans participated
under this agreement qualify as a sale pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 140. Accordingly,
the participation interests sold are not included on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
12
Unsecured Line of Credit
The Company has a $750.0 million unsecured line of credit that terminates in May 2012. As of June
30, 2009, there was $691.5 million outstanding on this line. The weighted average interest rate on
this line of credit was 0.80% as of June 30, 2009. Upon termination in 2012, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to maintain this line of credit, find alternative funding,
or increase the amount outstanding under the line, if necessary. The lending commitment under the
Companys unsecured line of credit is provided by a total of thirteen banks, with no individual
bank representing more than 11% of the total lending commitment. The bank lending group includes
Lehman Brothers Bank (Lehman), a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which represents
approximately 7% of the lending commitment under the line of credit. On September 15, 2008, Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc. filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code. Since the bankruptcy filing, the Company has experienced funding delays from
Lehman for its portion of the lending commitment under the line of credit and the Company does not
expect that Lehman will fund future borrowing requests. As of
June 30, 2009, excluding Lehmans lending commitment, the Company has $51.2 million available for future use under its
unsecured line of credit.
The line of credit agreement contains certain financial covenants that, if not met, lead to an
event of default under the agreement. The covenants include maintaining:
|
|
|
A minimum consolidated net worth |
|
|
|
|
A minimum adjusted EBITDA to corporate debt interest (over the last four rolling
quarters) |
|
|
|
|
A limitation on subsidiary indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
A limitation on the percentage of non-guaranteed loans in the Companys portfolio |
As of June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of these requirements. Many of these
covenants are duplicated in the Companys other lending facilities, including its FFELP warehouse
facilities.
The Companys operating line of credit does not have any covenants related to unsecured debt
ratings. However, changes in the Companys ratings (as well as the amounts the Company borrows)
have modest implications on the pricing level at which the Company obtains funding.
A
default on the 2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility would result in an event
of default on the Companys unsecured line of credit that would
result in the outstanding balance on the line of credit becoming
immediately due and payable.
Debt Purchases
During the first and second quarters of 2009, the Company purchased $34.9 million and $35.5
million, respectively, of its 5.125% Senior Notes due 2010 (the 2010 Notes) for a purchase price
of $26.8 million and $31.1 million, respectively. These transactions resulted in gains of $8.1
million and $4.4 million, respectively. On July 28, 2009, the Company purchased $102.6 million of
the 2010 Notes at par. Subsequent to this transaction, the Company has $102.0 million of 2010 Notes
outstanding.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company purchased $1.75 million of its Junior Subordinated
Hybrid Securities for a purchase price of $0.35 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.4 million.
Subsequent
to June 30, 2009, the Company repurchased $21.6 million of certain asset-backed securities
for a purchase price of $19.3 million, which resulted in the
Company recording a gain of $2.3
million in the third quarter of 2009.
Any gains recorded by the Company from the purchase of debt are included in other income on the
Companys consolidated statement of operations.
5. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks managed by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange
risk.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys primary market risk exposure arises from fluctuations in its borrowing and lending
rates, the spread between which could impact the Company due to shifts in market interest rates.
Because the Company generates a significant portion of its earnings from its student
loan spread, the interest rate sensitivity of the balance sheet is a key profitability driver. The
Company has adopted a policy of periodically reviewing the mismatch related to the interest rate
characteristics of its assets and liabilities together with the Companys outlook as to current and
future market conditions. Based on those factors, the Company uses derivative instruments as part
of its overall risk management strategy.
13
The Company issues asset-backed securities, the vast majority being variable rate, to fund its
student loan assets. The variable rate debt is generally indexed to 3-month LIBOR, set by auction,
or through a remarketing process. The income generated by the Companys student loan assets is
generally driven by short term indices (treasury bills, commercial paper, and certain fixed rates)
that are different from those which affect the Companys liabilities (generally LIBOR), which
creates basis risk. Moreover, the Company also faces repricing risk due to the timing of the
interest rate resets on its liabilities, which may occur as infrequently as every quarter, and the
timing of the interest rate resets on its assets, which generally occurs daily. In a declining
interest rate environment, this may cause the Companys student loan spread to compress, while in a
rising rate environment, it may cause the spread to increase.
In using different index types and different index reset frequencies to fund assets, the Company is
exposed to interest rate risk in the form of basis risk and repricing risk, which, as noted above,
is the risk that the different indices may reset at different frequencies, or will not move in the
same direction or with the same magnitude. While these indices are short term with rate movements
that are highly correlated over a longer period of time, they have recently become less correlated.
Due to capital market dislocations or other factors not within the Companys control, there can be
no assurance the indices will regain their high level of correlation in the future.
The Company has used derivative instruments to hedge the repricing risk due to the timing of the
interest rate resets on its assets and liabilities. The Company has entered into basis swaps in
which the Company (i) receives three-month LIBOR set discretely in advance and pays a daily
weighted average three-month LIBOR less a spread as defined in the agreements (the
Average/Discrete Basis Swaps); and (ii) receives three-month LIBOR and pays one-month LIBOR plus
or minus a spread as defined in the agreements (the 1/3 Basis Swaps).
However, the Company does not generally hedge the basis risk due to the different interest rate
indices associated with its assets and liabilities, since the derivatives needed to hedge this risk
are generally illiquid or non-existent and the relationship between the indices for most of the
Companys assets and liabilities has been highly correlated over a long period of time.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $24.0 billion of FFELP loans indexed to
three-month financial commercial paper rate and $20.1 billion of debt indexed to LIBOR. Due to the
unintended consequences of government intervention in the commercial paper markets and limited
issuances of qualifying financial commercial paper, the relationship between the three-month
financial CP and LIBOR rates has been distorted and volatile. To address this issue, the Department
announced that for purposes of calculating the FFELP loan index from October 27, 2008 to December
31, 2008, the Federal Reserves Commercial Paper Funding Facility rate was used for those days in
which no three-month financial commercial paper rate was available. This action partially mitigated
the volatility between CP and LIBOR during the fourth quarter of 2008. However, the Department did
not implement a similar methodology for the first and second quarters of 2009, which negatively
impacted the Companys interest income earned on its student loan portfolio.
The following table summarizes the Companys basis swaps outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 used by the Company to hedge the repricing risk due to the timing of the interest
rate resets on its assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
|
|
Average/Discrete |
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Basis Swaps |
|
|
1/3 Basis Swaps (c) |
|
|
2009 (a) |
|
$ |
7,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (b) |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company terminated all the Average/Discrete Basis Swaps with
a maturity in 2009 for total proceeds of $2.4 million. |
14
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Certain of these derivatives have forward effective start dates of January 2010 ($1.5
billion), February 2010 ($1.5 billion), and March 2010 ($1.5 billion). |
|
(c) |
|
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company entered into additional 1/3 Basis Swaps with
notional amounts of $500.0 million and $150.0 million with
maturity dates in 2014 and 2039,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
|
|
Average/Discrete |
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Basis Swaps |
|
|
1/3 Basis Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2,700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,600,000 |
|
|
|
2,650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company terminated and/or amended certain
Average/Discrete Basis Swap agreements for net payments of $11.7 million.
FFELP loans originated prior to April 1, 2006 generally earn interest at the higher of a floating
rate based on the Special Allowance Payment or SAP formula set by the Department and the borrower
rate, which is fixed over a period of time. The SAP formula is based on an applicable index plus a
fixed spread that is dependent upon when the loan was originated, the loans repayment status, and
funding sources for the loan. The Company generally finances its student loan portfolio with
variable rate debt. In low and/or declining interest rate environments, when the fixed borrower
rate is higher than the rate produced by the SAP formula, the Companys student loans earn at a
fixed rate while the interest on the variable rate debt typically continues to decline. In these
interest rate environments, the Company may earn additional spread income that it refers to as
floor income.
Depending on the type of loan and when it was originated, the borrower rate is either fixed to term
or is reset to an annual rate each July 1. As a result, for loans where the borrower rate is fixed
to term, the Company may earn floor income for an extended period of time, which the Company refers
to as fixed rate floor income, and for those loans where the borrower rate is reset annually on
July 1, the Company may earn floor income to the next reset date, which the Company refers to as
variable rate floor income. In accordance with legislation enacted in 2006, lenders are required to
rebate fixed rate floor income and variable rate floor income to the Department for all FFELP loans
first originated on or after April 1, 2006.
Absent the use of derivative instruments, a rise in interest rates may reduce the amount of floor
income received and this may have an impact on earnings due to interest margin compression caused
by increasing financing costs, until such time as the federally insured loans earn interest at a
variable rate in accordance with their special allowance payment formulas. In higher interest rate
environments, where the interest rate rises above the borrower rate and fixed rate loans
effectively become variable rate loans, the impact of the rate fluctuations is reduced.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company held the following interest rate derivatives to hedge fixed-rate
student loan assets earning fixed rate floor income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average fixed |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
rate paid by |
|
Maturity |
|
Amount |
|
|
the Company (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (b) |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For all interest rate derivatives, the Company receives discrete three-month LIBOR. |
|
(b) |
|
Certain of these derivatives have forward effective start dates of July 2009 ($250 million)
and August 2009 ($250 million). |
15
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
During 2006, the Company completed separate debt offerings of student loan asset-backed securities
that included 420.5 million and 352.7 million Euro-denominated notes (the Euro Notes) with
interest rates based on a spread to the EURIBOR index. As a result of this transaction, the Company
is exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the
U.S. dollar and Euro. The principal and accrued interest on these notes is re-measured at each
reporting period and recorded on the Companys balance sheet in U.S. dollars based on the foreign
currency exchange rate on that date. Changes in the principal and accrued interest amounts as a
result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations are included in the derivative market value,
foreign currency, and put option adjustments and derivative settlements, net in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations.
The Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps in connection with the issuance of the
Euro Notes. Under the terms of these derivative instrument agreements, the Company receives from a
counterparty a spread to the EURIBOR index based on notional amounts of 420.5 million and 352.7
million and pays a spread to the LIBOR index based on notional amounts of $500.0 million and $450.0
million, respectively. In addition, under the terms of these agreements, all principal payments on
the Euro Notes will effectively be paid at the exchange rate in effect as of the issuance of the
notes.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded an expense of $63.9 million
and $16.6 million, respectively, as a result of re-measurement of the Euro Notes, and income of
$41.2 million and an expense of $15.9 million, respectively, for the change in the fair value of
the related derivative instruments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company
recorded income of $4.4 million and an expense of $88.5 million, respectively, as a result of
re-measurement of the Euro Notes, and an expense of $2.4 million and income of $91.7 million,
respectively, for the change in the fair value of the related derivative instruments.
The re-measurement of the Euro-denominated bonds generally correlates with the change in fair
value of the cross-currency interest rate swaps. However, the Company will experience unrealized
gains or losses related to the cross-currency interest rate swaps if the two underlying indices
(and related forward curve) do not move in parallel. Management intends to hold the cross-currency
interest rate swaps through the maturity of the Euro-denominated bonds.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), which requires that every derivative
instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair
value. Management has structured all of the Companys derivative transactions with the intent that
each is economically effective; however, the Companys derivative instruments do not qualify for
hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. As a result, the change in fair value of the Companys
derivatives at each reporting date are included in derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments and derivative settlements, net in the Companys consolidated statements of
operations. Changes or shifts in the forward yield curve and fluctuations in currency rates can
significantly impact the valuation of the Companys derivatives. Accordingly, changes or shifts to
the forward yield curve and fluctuations in currency rates will impact the financial position and
results of operations of the Company.
Any proceeds received or payments made by the Company
to terminate a derivative in advance of its expiration date or to
amend the terms of an existing derivative, are included in derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments and
derivative settlements, net on the consolidated statements of operations and are accounted for as
a change in fair value on such derivative.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the Companys derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
Fair value as of |
|
|
Fair value as of |
|
|
Fair value as of |
|
|
Fair value as of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Average/Discrete Basis Swaps |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
(7,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
1/3 Basis Swaps |
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
5,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
151,419 |
|
|
|
167,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
168,720 |
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
(7,354 |
) |
|
|
(1,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments in the consolidated
statements of operations. All gains and losses recognized in income related to the Companys
derivative activity are included in Derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option
adjustments and derivative settlements, net, on the consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated |
|
Amount of gain (or loss) recognized |
|
|
Amount of gain (or loss) recognized |
|
as hedging under SFAS No. 133 |
|
in income on derivatives |
|
|
in income on derivatives |
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Settlements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
(7,842 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11,019 |
) |
Average/Discrete Basis Swaps |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
44,711 |
|
1/3 Basis Swaps |
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,401 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
7,131 |
|
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
10,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total settlements |
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
45,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
38,969 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
Average/Discrete Basis Swaps |
|
|
(6,682 |
) |
|
|
(25,049 |
) |
|
|
(18,678 |
) |
|
|
(51,337 |
) |
1/3 Basis Swaps |
|
|
(7,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,867 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
41,209 |
|
|
|
(2,461 |
) |
|
|
(15,902 |
) |
|
|
91,668 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in fair value |
|
|
29,852 |
|
|
|
11,459 |
|
|
|
(22,270 |
) |
|
|
47,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact to statements of
operations |
|
$ |
39,387 |
|
|
|
15,896 |
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
92,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Credit and Market Risk
By using derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to credit and market risk.
When the fair value of a derivative instrument is negative, the Company would owe the counterparty
if the derivative was settled and, therefore, has no immediate credit risk. Additionally, if the
negative fair value of derivatives with a counterparty exceeds a specified threshold, the Company
may have to make a collateral deposit with the counterparty. The threshold at which the Company
posts collateral may depend on the Companys unsecured credit rating. If interest and foreign
currency exchange rates move materially, the Company could be required to deposit a significant
amount of collateral with its derivative instrument counterparties. The collateral deposits, if
significant, could negatively impact the Companys liquidity and capital resources.
When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this generally indicates that the
counterparty would owe the Company if the derivative was settled. If the counterparty fails to
perform, credit risk with such counterparty is equal to the extent of the fair value gain in the
derivative less any collateral held by the Company.
The Company attempts to manage market and credit risks associated with interest and foreign
currency exchange rates by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk
that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties that are
reviewed periodically by the Companys risk committee. The Company also has a policy of requiring
that all derivative contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association,
Inc. Master Agreement.
6. Segment Reporting
The Company has five operating segments as defined in SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as follows: Student Loan and Guaranty
Servicing, Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce, Enrollment Services, Software and
Technical Services, and Asset Generation and Management. The Companys operating segments are
defined by the products and services they offer or the types of customers they serve, and they
reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by management. The
accounting policies of the Companys operating segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. Intersegment revenues are charged by a segment to
another segment that provides the product or service. Intersegment revenues and expenses are
included within each segment consistent with the income statement presentation provided to
management. Changes in management structure or allocation methodologies and procedures may result
in changes in reported segment financial information.
The management reporting process measures the performance of the Companys operating segments based
on the management structure of the Company as well as the methodology used by management to
evaluate performance and allocate resources. Management, including the Companys chief operating
decision maker, evaluates the performance of the Companys operating segments based on their
profitability. As discussed further below, management measures the profitability of the Companys
operating segments based on base net income. Accordingly, information regarding the Companys
operating segments is provided based on base net income. The Companys base net income is not
a defined term within generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and may not be comparable
to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Unlike financial accounting, there is no
comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management reporting.
17
Historically, the Company generated the majority of its revenue from net interest income earned in
its Asset Generation and Management operating segment. In recent years, the Company has made
several acquisitions that have expanded the Companys products and services and has diversified its
revenue primarily from fee-based businesses. The Company currently offers a broad range of
pre-college, in-college, and post-college products and services to students, families, schools, and
financial institutions. These products and services help students and families plan and pay for
their education and students plan their careers. The Companys products and services are designed
to simplify the education planning and financing process and are focused on providing value to
students, families, and schools throughout the education life cycle. The Company continues to
diversify its sources of revenue, including those generated from businesses that are not dependent
upon government programs, thereby reducing legislative and political risk.
Fee-Based Operating Segments
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing
The Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing segment provides for the servicing of the Companys student
loan portfolios and the portfolios of third parties and servicing provided to guaranty agencies.
The servicing and business process outsourcing activities include loan origination activities,
application processing, borrower updates, payment processing, due diligence procedures, and claim
processing. These activities are performed internally for the Companys portfolio in addition to
generating fee revenue when performed for third-party clients. The guaranty servicing, servicing
support, and business process outsourcing activities include providing software and data center
services, borrower and loan updates, default aversion tracking services, claim processing services,
and post-default collection services to guaranty agencies. The following are the primary product
and service offerings the Company offers as part of its Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing
segment:
|
|
|
Origination and servicing of FFELP loans |
|
|
|
|
Origination and servicing of non-federally insured student loans |
|
|
|
|
Servicing and support outsourcing for guaranty agencies |
Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce
The Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce segment provides products and services to help
institutions and education-seeking families manage the payment of education costs during the
pre-college and college stages of the education life cycle. The Company provides actively managed
tuition payment solutions, online payment processing, detailed information reporting, financial
needs analysis, and data integration services to K-12 and higher educational institutions,
families, and students. In addition, the Company provides customer-focused electronic transactions,
information sharing, and account and bill presentment to colleges and universities.
Enrollment Services
The Enrollment Services segment offers products and services that are focused on helping (i)
students plan and prepare for life after high school (content management and publishing and editing
services) and (ii) colleges recruit and retain students (lead generation and recruitment services).
Lead generation products and services include vendor lead management services and admissions lead
generation. Publishing and editing services include test preparation study guides and essay and
resume editing services. Content management products and services include online courses and
related services. Recruitment services include pay per click marketing management, email marketing,
list marketing services, and admissions consulting.
Software and Technical Services
The Software and Technical Services segment provides information technology products and
full-service technical consulting, with core areas of business in educational loan software
solutions, business intelligence, technical consulting services, and Enterprise Content Management
solutions.
Asset Generation and Management Operating Segment
The Asset Generation and Management segment includes the acquisition, management, and ownership of
the Companys student loan assets. Revenues are primarily generated from the Companys earnings
from the spread, referred to as the Companys student loan spread, between the yield received on
the student loan portfolio and the costs associated with originating, acquiring, and financing its
student loan portfolio. The Company generates student loan assets through direct origination or
through acquisitions. The student loan assets are held in a series of education lending
subsidiaries designed specifically for this purpose. In addition to the student loan portfolio, all
costs and activity associated with the generation of assets, funding of those assets, and
maintenance of the debt transactions are included in this segment. This includes derivative
activity and the related derivative market value and foreign currency adjustments. The Company is
also able to leverage its capital market expertise by providing investment advisory services and
other related services to third parties through a licensed broker dealer subsidiary. Revenues and
expenses for those functions are also included in the Asset Generation and Management segment.
18
Segment
Operating Results Base Net Income
The tables below include the operating results of each of the Companys operating segments.
Management, including the chief operating decision maker, evaluates the Company on certain non-GAAP
performance measures that the Company refers to as base net income for each operating segment.
While base net income is not a substitute for reported results under GAAP, the Company relies on
base net income to manage each operating segment because it believes this measure provides
additional information regarding the operational and performance indicators that are most closely
assessed by management.
Base net income is the primary financial performance measure used by management to develop the
Companys financial plans, track results, and establish corporate performance targets and incentive
compensation. Management believes this information provides additional insight into the financial
performance of the core business activities of the Companys operating segments. Accordingly, the
tables presented below reflect base net income, which is the operating measure reviewed and
utilized by management to manage the business. Reconciliation of the segment totals to the
Companys operating results in accordance with GAAP are also included in the tables below.
Segment Results and Reconciliations to GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
156,233 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
163,189 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,338 |
|
|
|
8,166 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
57,895 |
|
|
|
(6,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
57,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
49,895 |
|
|
|
(6,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
49,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,803 |
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,194 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
Other income |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,527 |
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
20,888 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
25,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
|
|
(33,577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
51,246 |
|
|
|
11,901 |
|
|
|
29,024 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
101,261 |
|
|
|
13,580 |
|
|
|
15,119 |
|
|
|
(33,577 |
) |
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
|
|
62,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
|
|
31,335 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,180 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
terminination costs |
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
11,140 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
17,358 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
8,259 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
39,084 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
20,732 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
(32,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36,492 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
27,504 |
|
|
|
7,739 |
|
|
|
81,145 |
|
|
|
28,342 |
|
|
|
15,661 |
|
|
|
(33,577 |
) |
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
97,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
20,140 |
|
|
|
35,133 |
|
|
|
(7,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,756 |
) |
|
|
14,121 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
(5,612 |
) |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
(7,654 |
) |
|
|
(13,351 |
) |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
(5,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,155 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
(6,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,609 |
) |
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income taxes are applied based on 38% of income (loss) before income taxes for the individual operating segments. |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
282,293 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
305,802 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
222,402 |
|
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
59,891 |
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
73,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
53,891 |
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
67,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
23,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,664 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,821 |
|
Tutition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
Other income |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Intercompany revenue |
|
|
18,382 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
19,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
(33,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,201 |
) |
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
43,135 |
|
|
|
10,194 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
|
85,810 |
|
|
|
16,694 |
|
|
|
15,228 |
|
|
|
(33,783 |
) |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
92,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
12,491 |
|
|
|
5,784 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
29,350 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
12,828 |
|
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
43,549 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
terminination costs |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
8,011 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
14,921 |
|
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
39,618 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
12,205 |
|
|
|
18,952 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
(32,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
30,220 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
25,222 |
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
69,988 |
|
|
|
25,949 |
|
|
|
28,457 |
|
|
|
(33,783 |
) |
|
|
7,311 |
|
|
|
97,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
|
|
44,636 |
|
|
|
(22,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,170 |
|
|
|
61,919 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
(6,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
19,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
|
|
(15,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,987 |
|
|
|
42,724 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,079 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
|
|
(15,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,968 |
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income taxes are applied based on the consolidated effective tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
328,820 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
338,199 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,932 |
|
|
|
16,634 |
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
91,888 |
|
|
|
(13,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
85,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
76,388 |
|
|
|
(13,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
70,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
56,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,274 |
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
Other income |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
8,892 |
|
|
|
19,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,389 |
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
40,766 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
7,020 |
|
|
|
48,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,384 |
|
|
|
(65,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
98,964 |
|
|
|
27,496 |
|
|
|
57,795 |
|
|
|
17,044 |
|
|
|
201,299 |
|
|
|
42,383 |
|
|
|
35,757 |
|
|
|
(65,557 |
) |
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
|
|
174,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
12,947 |
|
|
|
11,958 |
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
|
|
63,864 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
12,501 |
|
|
|
(1,628 |
) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
78,406 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
19,737 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
32,336 |
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
|
18,720 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
|
|
75,636 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
18,954 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
22,709 |
|
|
|
38,608 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
(62,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
69,263 |
|
|
|
18,986 |
|
|
|
55,233 |
|
|
|
14,247 |
|
|
|
157,729 |
|
|
|
52,952 |
|
|
|
32,705 |
|
|
|
(65,557 |
) |
|
|
12,098 |
|
|
|
189,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
29,780 |
|
|
|
8,551 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
43,690 |
|
|
|
65,819 |
|
|
|
(10,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,489 |
) |
|
|
55,177 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
(11,317 |
) |
|
|
(3,249 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
(16,603 |
) |
|
|
(25,012 |
) |
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,961 |
|
|
|
(21,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,463 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
27,087 |
|
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
|
(7,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,528 |
) |
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income taxes are applied based on 38% of income (loss) before income taxes for the individual operating segments. |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
856 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
602,651 |
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
647,468 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
538,417 |
|
|
|
19,826 |
|
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
557,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
64,234 |
|
|
|
(17,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
89,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
53,234 |
|
|
|
(17,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
78,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
48,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,320 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,482 |
|
Tutition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
14,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,183 |
|
Other income |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,379 |
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
38,606 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
42,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,172 |
|
|
|
(73,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,072 |
) |
|
|
(41,606 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,965 |
) |
|
|
45,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
89,499 |
|
|
|
24,301 |
|
|
|
53,327 |
|
|
|
14,944 |
|
|
|
182,071 |
|
|
|
18,075 |
|
|
|
33,805 |
|
|
|
(73,295 |
) |
|
|
(52,037 |
) |
|
|
108,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
26,489 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
|
|
9,870 |
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
27,419 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
97,392 |
|
Restructure expense- severence and contract
terminination costs |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
(7,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment expense |
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
9,351 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,834 |
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
16,498 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
5,289 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
27,731 |
|
|
|
10,439 |
|
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
13,121 |
|
|
|
80,375 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
23,100 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
28,020 |
|
|
|
39,554 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
(69,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
71,908 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
|
|
52,052 |
|
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
152,991 |
|
|
|
65,366 |
|
|
|
66,530 |
|
|
|
(73,295 |
) |
|
|
15,167 |
|
|
|
226,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
18,447 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
31,019 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
(49,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,459 |
) |
|
|
(39,277 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
5,719 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
(15,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,202 |
) |
|
|
(12,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
|
12,728 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
(34,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,257 |
) |
|
|
(27,101 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,728 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
(34,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,276 |
) |
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income taxes are applied based on the consolidated effective tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. |
Corporate Activity and Overhead in the previous tables primarily includes the following items:
|
|
|
Income earned on certain investment activities |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense incurred on unsecured debt transactions |
|
|
|
|
Other products and service offerings that are not considered operating segments |
|
|
|
|
Certain corporate activities and unallocated overhead functions related to executive
management, human resources, accounting and finance, legal, marketing, and corporate
technology support |
22
The adjustments required to reconcile from the Companys base net income measure to its GAAP
results of operations relate to differing treatments for derivatives, foreign currency transaction
adjustments, and certain other items that management does not consider in evaluating the Companys
operating results. The following tables reflect adjustments associated with these areas by
operating segment and Corporate Activity and Overhead:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,445 |
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
34,013 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
2,701 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,042 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax effect (6) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(11,173 |
) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(14,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
18,230 |
|
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
19,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,866 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(15,755 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,561 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,726 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (5) |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
Net tax effect (6) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(965 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(21,108 |
) |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
(16,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,325 |
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
38,893 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
3,756 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,502 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax effect (6) |
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(12,800 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(16,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
20,023 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
26,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,534 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
42,072 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,121 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,780 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (5) |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
Net tax effect (6) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(3,378 |
) |
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
(8,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
17,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments: Base net
income excludes the periodic unrealized gains and losses that are caused by the
change in fair value on derivatives used in the Companys risk management strategy in
which the Company does not qualify for hedge treatment under GAAP. Included in
base net income are the economic effects of the Companys derivative instruments,
which includes any cash paid or received being recognized as an expense or revenue
upon actual derivative settlements. Base net income also excludes the foreign
currency transaction gains or losses caused by the re-measurement of the Companys
Euro-denominated bonds to U.S. dollars and the change in fair value of put options
issued by the Company for certain business acquisitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Amortization of intangible assets: Base net income excludes the amortization of
acquired intangibles. |
23
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Compensation related to business combinations: The Company has structured certain
business combinations in which the consideration paid has been dependent on the
sellers continued employment with the Company. As such, the value of the
consideration paid is recognized as compensation expense by the Company over the term
of the applicable employment agreement. Base net income excludes this expense. |
|
(4) |
|
Variable-rate floor income: Loans that reset annually on July 1 can generate
excess spread income compared with the rate based on the special allowance payment
formula in declining interest rate environments. The Company refers to this
additional income as variable-rate floor income. The Company excludes variable-rate
floor income, net of settlements paid on derivatives used to hedge student loan assets
earning variable-rate floor income, from its base net income since the timing and
amount of variable-rate floor income (if any) is uncertain, it has been eliminated by
legislation for all loans originated on and after April 1, 2006, and it is in excess
of expected spreads. In addition, because variable-rate floor income is subject to
the underlying rate for the subject loans being reset annually on July 1, it is a
factor beyond the Companys control which can affect the period-to-period
comparability of results of operations. |
|
|
|
Prior to October 1, 2008, variable rate floor income was calculated by the Company on
a statutory maximum basis. However, as a result of the disruption in the capital
markets beginning in August 2007, the full benefit of variable rate floor income
calculated on a statutory maximum basis has not been realized by the Company due to
the widening of the spread between short term interest rate indices and the Companys
actual cost of funds. As a result of the ongoing volatility of interest rates,
effective October 1, 2008, the Company changed its calculation of variable rate floor
income to better reflect the economic benefit received by the Company. The economic
benefit received by the Company related to variable rate floor income was $6.0
million and $19.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $7.5 million and $25.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Variable rate floor income calculated on a statutory
maximum basis was $13.0 million and $21.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, and $23.8 million and $40.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Beginning October 1, 2008, the economic
benefit received by the Company has been used to determine base net income. |
|
|
|
The Company has used
derivative instruments to hedge variable rate floor income during
certain periods. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
the Company made payments (settlements) of $7.2 million and
$10.0 million, respectively, on such derivatives. These
settlements are netted with variable-rate floor income and are
excluded from base net income. |
|
(5) |
|
Discontinued operations: In May 2007, the Company sold EDULINX. As a result of
this transaction, the results of operations for EDULINX are reported as discontinued
operations for all periods presented. The Company presents base net income
excluding discontinued operations since the operations and cash flows of EDULINX have
been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company. |
|
(6) |
|
For 2009, income taxes are applied based on 38% of income (loss) before income
taxes for the individual operating segments. For 2008, income taxes for each
individual operating segment are applied based on the consolidated effective tax rate. |
7. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
useful life as of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships (net of accumulated
amortization of $34,306
and $29,737, respectively) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
$ |
46,054 |
|
|
|
50,623 |
|
Trade names (net of accumulated amortization of $7,369 and
$5,478, respectively) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9,690 |
|
|
|
11,581 |
|
Covenants not to compete (net of accumulated amortization of
$17,683 and $14,887, respectively) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5,939 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
Database and content (net of accumulated amortization of $6,574
and $5,447, respectively) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
4,033 |
|
Computer software (net of accumulated amortization of $8,642
and $7,441, respectively) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Student lists (net of accumulated amortization of $8,197 and
$7,855, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
Other (net of accumulated amortization of $108 and $95, respectively) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable
intangible assets |
|
79 months |
|
|
$ |
65,115 |
|
|
|
77,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
The Company recorded amortization expense on its intangible assets of $5.8 million and $6.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $11.9 million and
$13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company will
continue to amortize intangible assets over their remaining useful lives. As of June 30, 2009, the
Company estimates it will record amortization expense as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
10,379 |
|
2010 |
|
|
15,985 |
|
2011 |
|
|
10,031 |
|
2012 |
|
|
9,029 |
|
2013 |
|
|
6,168 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
13,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the Companys allocation of goodwill by operating segment as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce |
|
$ |
58,086 |
|
Enrollment Services |
|
|
66,613 |
|
Software and Technical Services |
|
|
8,596 |
|
Asset Generation and Management |
|
|
41,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
175,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value, and
expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies when other
accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements; it does not require new fair
value measurements. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released
FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (SFAS No. 157-2),
which delayed the application of SFAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157-2 on certain nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, which are recorded at fair value only upon impairment.
Fair value under SFAS No. 157 is defined as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between willing and able market participants. The Company determines fair
value using valuation techniques which are based upon observable and unobservable inputs.
Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs
reflect the Companys market assumptions. Transaction costs are not included in the determination
of fair value. When possible, the Company seeks to validate the models output to market
transactions. Depending on the availability of observable inputs and prices, different valuation
models could produce materially different fair value estimates. The values presented may not
represent future fair values and may not be realizable. Additionally, there may be inherent
weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including
discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of
current or future values.
Under SFAS No. 157, the Company categorizes its fair value estimates based on a hierarchal
framework associated with three levels of price transparency utilized in measuring financial
instruments at fair value. Classification is based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value of the instrument. The three levels include:
|
|
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. The types of financial
instruments included in Level 1 are highly liquid instruments with quoted prices. |
|
|
|
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations
whose inputs are observable or whose primary value drivers are observable. |
|
|
|
Level 3: Instruments whose primary value drivers are unobservable. Inputs are developed
based on the best information available; however, significant judgment is required by
management in developing the inputs. |
25
The following table presents the Companys financial assets and liabilities that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. All financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value are categorized as Level 1 or 2 based on the above hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (a) |
|
$ |
366,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,827 |
|
Restricted cash (a) |
|
|
481,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,641 |
|
Restricted cash due to customers (a) |
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,127 |
|
Other assets (b) |
|
|
4,577 |
|
|
|
4,553 |
|
|
|
9,130 |
|
Fair value of derivative instruments (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,720 |
|
|
|
168,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
894,172 |
|
|
|
173,273 |
|
|
|
1,067,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments (c) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (a) |
|
$ |
189,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,847 |
|
Restricted cash (a) |
|
|
387,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,404 |
|
Restricted cash due to customers (a) |
|
|
160,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
Other assets (b) |
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
8,817 |
|
Fair value of derivative instruments (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
743,177 |
|
|
|
179,050 |
|
|
|
922,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments (c) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash due
to customers approximates fair value due to the variable rate of interest and/or the short
maturities of these instruments. |
|
(b) |
|
Other assets includes investments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value
measurement is based upon quoted prices. Level 1 investments include investments traded on an
active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, and U.S. Treasury securities that are
traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 investments include
corporate debt securities. |
|
(c) |
|
All derivatives are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of
derivative financial instruments are determined by derivative pricing models using the stated
terms of the contracts and observable yield curves, forward foreign currency exchange rates,
and volatilities from active markets. It is the Companys policy to compare its derivative
fair values to those received by its counterparties in order to validate the models outputs.
Fair value of derivative instruments is comprised of market value less accrued interest and
excludes collateral. |
The following table summarizes the fair values of all of the Companys financial instruments
on the consolidated balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Carrying value |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loans receivable |
|
$ |
24,278,217 |
|
|
|
23,889,571 |
|
|
|
25,743,732 |
|
|
|
25,413,008 |
|
Student loans receivable held for sale |
|
|
1,781,972 |
|
|
|
1,749,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
366,827 |
|
|
|
366,827 |
|
|
|
189,847 |
|
|
|
189,847 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
481,641 |
|
|
|
481,641 |
|
|
|
387,404 |
|
|
|
387,404 |
|
Restricted cash due to customers |
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
600,839 |
|
|
|
600,839 |
|
|
|
609,868 |
|
|
|
609,868 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
385,158 |
|
|
|
385,158 |
|
|
|
471,878 |
|
|
|
471,878 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,130 |
|
|
|
9,130 |
|
|
|
8,817 |
|
|
|
8,817 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
168,720 |
|
|
|
168,720 |
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes payable |
|
|
27,052,894 |
|
|
|
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
26,512,082 |
|
|
|
26,787,959 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
34,911 |
|
|
|
34,911 |
|
|
|
81,576 |
|
|
|
81,576 |
|
Due to customers |
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
|
|
160,985 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
26
The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are discussed above. The remaining financial assets
and liabilities were estimated using the following methods and assumptions:
Student Loans Receivable and Student Loans Receivable Held for Sale
The fair value of student loans receivable is estimated at amounts recently paid and/or received or
amounts anticipated to be received by the Company to acquire and/or sell similar loans in the
market and/or the characteristics of the portfolio.
Restricted Investments, Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable, and Due to Customers
The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the variable rate of interest and/or the short
maturities of these instruments.
Bonds and Notes Payable
The fair value of the bonds and notes payable is based on market prices for securities that possess
similar credit risk and interest rate risk.
Limitations
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between
willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the
Companys various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those
techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and
estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an
immediate settlement of the instrument.
9. Shareholders Equity
Issuance of Class A Common Stock
In March 2009, the Companys 2008 annual performance-based incentives awarded to management were
paid in approximately 455,000 fully vested and unrestricted shares of Class A common stock issued
pursuant to the Companys Restricted Stock Plan. It is the Companys current intention to pay
future annual performance-based incentives to management, if any, in common stock issued pursuant
to the Restricted Stock Plan.
10. Earnings per Common Share
Presented below is a summary of the components used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per
share. The Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, on January 1, 2009, which
requires application of the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under this
pronouncement, unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are
considered securities which participate in undistributed earnings with common stock. The two-class
method requires the calculation of separate earnings per share amounts for the unvested share-based
awards and for common stock. Earnings per share attributable to common stock is shown in the table
below. Prior period earnings per share data has been retroactively adjusted to conform to the
pronouncement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Nelnet, Inc. |
|
$ |
8,203 |
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
Less
earnings (loss) allocated to unvested restricted stockholders |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
8,151 |
|
|
|
43,398 |
|
|
|
33,439 |
|
|
|
(25,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
49,534,413 |
|
|
|
49,095,153 |
|
|
|
49,339,451 |
|
|
|
49,073,580 |
|
Dilutive effect of the assumed vesting of restricted stock awards |
|
|
199,148 |
|
|
|
219,788 |
|
|
|
204,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
49,733,561 |
|
|
|
49,314,941 |
|
|
|
49,543,461 |
|
|
|
49,073,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No dilutive effect of nonvested restricted stock is presented for the six months ended June
30, 2008 as the Company reported a net loss and including these shares would have been antidilutive
for the period. The dilutive effect of these shares if the Company had net income for the period
was not significant.
27
11. Gain from Sale of Equity Method Investment
On September 28, 2007, the Company sold its 50% membership interests in Premiere Credit of North
America, LLC (Premiere) for initial proceeds of $10.0 million. The Company recognized an initial
gain on the sale of Premiere of $3.9 million during the three month period ended September 30,
2007. In January 2009, the Company earned $3.5 million in additional consideration as a result of
the sale of Premiere. This payment represented contingent consideration that was owed to the
Company if Premiere was awarded a collections contract as defined in the purchase agreement. The
$3.5 million of contingent consideration is included in other income in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
12. Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Reviews
General
The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits, and proceedings that arise in the normal course
of business. These matters principally consist of claims by student loan borrowers disputing the
manner in which their student loans have been processed and disputes with other business entities.
In addition, from time to time the Company receives information and document requests from state or
federal regulators concerning its business practices. The Company cooperates with these inquiries
and responds to the requests. While the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any inquiry
or investigation, the Company believes its activities have materially complied with applicable law,
including the Higher Education Act, the rules and regulations adopted by the Department of
Education thereunder, and the Departments guidance regarding those rules and regulations. On the
basis of present information, anticipated insurance coverage, and advice received from counsel, it
is the opinion of the Companys management that the disposition or ultimate determination of these
claims, lawsuits, and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, financial position, or results of operations.
Department of Education Review
The Department of Education periodically reviews participants in the FFELP for compliance with
program provisions. On June 28, 2007, the Department notified the Company that it would be
conducting a review of the Companys practices in connection with the prohibited inducement
provisions of the Higher Education Act and the associated regulations that allow borrowers to have
a choice of lenders. The Company understands that the Department selected several schools and
lenders for review. The Company responded to the Departments requests for information and
documentation and cooperated with their review. On May 1, 2009, the Company received the
Departments preliminary program review report, which covered the Departments review of the period
from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2007. The preliminary program review report contained
certain initial findings of noncompliance with the Higher Education Acts prohibited inducement
provisions and required that the Company provide an explanation for the basis of the arrangements
noted in the preliminary program review report. The Company has responded and provided an
explanation of the arrangements noted in the Departments initial findings, and the Department is
expected to issue a final program review determination letter and advise the Company whether it
intends to take any additional action. To the extent any findings are contained in a final letter,
the additional action may include the assessment of fines or penalties, or the limitation,
suspension, and termination of the Companys participation in FFELP.
The Company believes that it has materially complied with the Higher Education Acts prohibited
inducement provisions and the rules, regulations, and guidance of the Department thereunder;
however, it cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the Departments review.
13. Recent Developments Legislation
On February 26, 2009, the President introduced several proposals related to the fiscal year 2010
Federal budget, including a proposal for the elimination of the FFEL Program and a recommendation
that all new student loan originations be funded through the Direct Loan Program, with loan
servicing to be provided by private sector companies through performance-based contracts with the
Department. On April 29, 2009, Congress passed a budget resolution including the Presidents
proposal to eliminate the FFEL Program using the budget reconciliation procedure. In the
reconciliation instructions, both the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
and the House Committee on Education and Labor shall report out for consideration by the Senate and
House, respectively, no later than October 15, 2009, changes to the budget which will reduce the
deficit by $1 billion for fiscal years 2009 through 2014. The resolution also includes non-binding
language to maintain a competitive private sector role in the student loan program. On May 7,
2009, the President released the detailed fiscal year 2010 Federal budget, which the Department of
Education has indicated reflects the elimination of the FFEL Program for loans originated on or
after July 1, 2010.
On July 21, 2009, the House Committee on Education and Labor approved the Student Aid Reform and
Fiscal Responsibility Act (SAFRA), which would eliminate the FFEL Program and require that after
July 1, 2010 all new federal student loans be made through the Direct Student Loan Program. It is
currently expected that the full House will consider the legislation in September 2009. The Senate
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions has not released a timeline for its
consideration of the proposed legislation, but it is expected that they will begin considering
student loan legislation no earlier than September. In addition to the Houses proposal, there are
several other proposals for changes to the education financing framework that may be considered as
the legislation moves forward. These include a possible extension of ECASLA, which expires on July
1, 2010, and the Student Loan Community Proposal, a proposal endorsed by a cross-section of FFELP
service providers (including the Company) as an alternative to the 100% federal direct lending
proposal reflected in SAFRA.
28
Elimination of the FFEL Program would impact the Companys operations and profitability by, among
other things, reducing the Companys interest revenues as a result of the inability to add new
FFELP loans to the Companys portfolio and reducing guarantee and third-party servicing fees as a
result of reduced FFELP loan servicing and origination volume. Additionally, the elimination of the
FFEL Program would reduce education loan software sales and related consulting fees received from
lenders using the Companys software products and services. The fair value and/or recoverability
of the Companys goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets related to these
activities could be adversely affected if the FFEL Program is eliminated.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All dollars are in thousands, except per share
amounts, unless otherwise noted).
The following discussion and analysis provides information that the Companys management believes
is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated results of operations and
financial condition of the Company. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Companys consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Forward-looking and cautionary statements
This report contains forward-looking statements and information that are based on managements
current expectations as of the date of this document. Statements that are not historical facts,
including statements about the Companys expectations and statements that assume or are dependent
upon future events, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject
to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause the actual results to be
materially different from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. These factors
include, among others, the risks and uncertainties set forth in Risk Factors and elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and changes in the terms of student loans and the educational credit marketplace
arising from the implementation of, or changes in, applicable laws and regulations (including
changes resulting from new laws, such as any new laws enacted to implement the Administrations
2010 budget proposals as they relate to FFELP), which may reduce the volume, average term, special
allowance payments, and yields on student loans under the FFEL Program of the Department or result
in loans being originated or refinanced under non-FFEL programs or may affect the terms upon which
banks and others agree to sell FFELP loans to the Company. The Company could also be affected by
changes in the demand for educational financing or in financing preferences of lenders, educational
institutions, students, and their families; the Companys ability to maintain its credit facilities
or obtain new facilities; the ability of lenders under the Companys credit facilities to fulfill
their lending commitments under these facilities; changes to the terms and conditions of the
liquidity programs offered by the Department; changes in the general interest rate environment and
in the securitization markets for education loans, which may increase the costs or limit the
availability of financings necessary to initiate, purchase, or carry education loans; losses from
loan defaults; changes in prepayment rates, guaranty rates, loan floor rates, and credit spreads;
the uncertain nature of estimated expenses that may be incurred and cost savings that may result
from restructuring plans; incorrect estimates or assumptions by management in connection with the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements; and changes in general economic conditions.
Additionally, financial projections may not prove to be accurate and may vary materially. The
reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Company is not obligated
to publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements to reflect events after the date of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or unforeseen events. Although the Company may from time to
time voluntarily update its prior forward-looking statements, it disclaims any commitment to do so
except as required by securities laws.
OVERVIEW
The Company is an education planning and financing company focused on providing quality products
and services to students, families, schools, and financial institutions nationwide. The Company is
a vertically-integrated organization that offers a broad range of products and services to its
customers throughout the education life cycle.
Built through a focus on long term organic growth and further enhanced by strategic acquisitions,
the Company earns its revenues from fee-based revenues related to its diversified education finance
and service operations and from net interest income on its portfolio of student loans.
29
The Company has certain business objectives in place for 2009 and beyond that include:
|
|
|
Grow and diversify fee-based businesses |
|
|
|
|
Manage operating costs |
|
|
|
|
Maximize the value of existing portfolio |
|
|
|
|
Eliminate exposure to liquidity risk and unfunded debt burden |
|
|
|
|
Reposition asset generation business |
Achieving these business objectives has impacted the financial condition and operating results of
the Company during the first and second quarters of 2009 as discussed below.
In addition, recent proposed legislation concerning the student loan industry may impact the future
financial condition and operating results of the Company.
Grow and Diversify Fee-Based Businesses
In recent years, the Company has expanded products and services generated from businesses that are
not dependent upon the FFEL Program, thereby reducing legislative and political risk. Revenues from
these businesses are primarily generated from products and services offered in the Companys
Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce and Enrollment Services operating segments. As shown
below, revenue earned from businesses less dependent upon government programs has grown $6.3
million (23.2%) for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, and
$11.6 million (19.9%) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce |
|
$ |
11,848 |
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment Services Lead Generation |
|
|
21,709 |
|
|
|
16,972 |
|
|
|
4,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,557 |
|
|
|
27,242 |
|
|
$ |
6,315 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment Services Other |
|
|
7,038 |
|
|
|
9,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing |
|
|
30,109 |
|
|
|
24,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and Technical Services |
|
|
5,194 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from fee-based businesses |
|
$ |
75,898 |
|
|
|
65,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce |
|
$ |
27,386 |
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment Services Lead Generation |
|
|
42,779 |
|
|
|
34,406 |
|
|
|
8,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,165 |
|
|
|
58,523 |
|
|
$ |
11,642 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment Services Other |
|
|
14,739 |
|
|
|
18,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing |
|
|
57,837 |
|
|
|
50,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and Technical Services |
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from fee-based businesses |
|
$ |
152,765 |
|
|
|
139,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Education Servicing Contract
In June 2009, the Department of Education named the Company as one of four private sector servicers
awarded a servicing contract to service student loans. The contract specifically covers the
servicing of all federally-owned student loans, including the servicing of FFELP loans purchased by
the Department pursuant to ECASLA. The Company expects the contract to begin on or around August
31, 2009 and span five years with one, five-year renewal option. Beginning in August 2010, the
contract will also cover the servicing on new loans originated under
the Direct Loan Program. Servicing volume will initially be allocated by the Department to
servicers awarded a contract, and performance factors such as customer satisfaction levels and
default rates will determine volume allocations over time. Servicing loans under this contract will
further diversify the Companys revenue and customer base.
30
Manage Operating Costs
Excluding costs to provide enrollment services and restructure
and impairment charges, operating
expenses decreased $7.6 million (9.0%) and $19.9 million (11.7%) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. These decreases were the result of continued
focus by the Company on managing costs and gaining efficiencies and continued benefits from prior
restructuring activities.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted a plan
to further streamline its operations
by continuing to reduce its geographic footprint and consolidate servicing operations and related
support services. The Company estimates that the charge to earnings associated with this
restructuring plan will be fully recognized by December 31, 2010 and will total approximately $9.2
million, consisting of approximately $5.7 million in severance costs and approximately $3.5 million
in contract terminations, of which approximately $5.4 million are expected to be recognized in
2009. During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded charges of $2.8
million related to this plan.
Maximize the Value of Existing Portfolio
CP/LIBOR distortion
The
Companys student loan spread during 2009 was impacted by the
distortion in the CP and LIBOR indices and fixed rate floor income as
discussed below.
The Companys variable student loan spread for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 was
0.60% and 0.54%, respectively, compared to 1.15% and 0.99% for the same periods in 2008. This
decrease is primarily related to the volatility between CP and LIBOR.
As of June 30, 2009 the Company had $24.0 billion of
FFELP loans indexed to three-month financial
commercial paper rate and $20.0 billion in debt indexed to LIBOR. Due to the unintended
consequences of government intervention in the commercial paper markets and limited issuances of
qualifying financial commercial paper, the relationship between the three-month financial CP and
LIBOR rates has been distorted and volatile. To address this issue, the Department announced that
for purposes of calculating the FFELP loan index from October 27, 2008 to December 31, 2008, the
Federal Reserves Commercial Paper Funding Facility rate was used for those days in which no
three-month financial commercial paper rate was available. This resulted in a CP/LIBOR spread of
21 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2008. This action partially mitigated the volatility
between CP and LIBOR during the fourth quarter of 2008. However, the Department did not implement a
similar methodology for the first and second quarters of 2009. The CP/LIBOR spread during the
first and second quarters of 2009 was 52 basis points and 45 basis points, respectively, compared
to 9 basis points and 5 basis points for the same periods in 2008. The distortion of these indexes
negatively impacted the Companys interest income earned on its student loan portfolio.
Fixed rate floor income
The Companys core student loan spread (variable student
loan spread including fixed rate floor
contribution) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was 1.09% and 1.02%, respectively,
compared to 1.11% and 1.00% for the same periods in 2008. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, loan interest income includes $37.1 million (59 basis points of spread contribution)
and $67.3 million (54 basis points), respectively, of fixed rate floor income compared to $9.9
million (15 basis points) and $18.4 million (14 basis points) during the same periods in 2008. The
increase in fixed rate floor income is due to lower interest rates in 2009 compared to the same
periods in 2008.
Loans originated prior to April 1, 2006 generally earn
interest at the higher of a floating rate
based on the Special Allowance Payment or the SAP formula set by the Department and the borrower
rate, which is fixed over a period of time. The SAP formula is based on an applicable index plus a
fixed spread that is dependent upon when the loan was originated, the loans repayment status, and
funding sources for the loan. The Company generally finances its student loan portfolio with
variable rate debt. In low and/or declining interest rate environments, when the fixed borrower
rate is higher than the rate produced by the SAP formula, the Companys student loans earn at a
fixed rate while the interest on the variable rate debt typically continues to decline. In these
interest rate environments, the Company may earn additional spread income that it refers to as
floor income. For loans where the borrower rate is fixed to term, the Company may earn floor
income for an extended period of time, which the Company refers to as fixed rate floor income.
31
Future Cash Flow from Portfolio
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $20.1 billion
of notes issued under asset-backed
securitizations that primarily reprice at a fixed spread to three month LIBOR and are structured to
substantially match the maturity of the funded assets. These notes fund FFELP student loans that
are predominantly set based on a spread to three month commercial paper. The three month LIBOR and
three month commercial paper indexes have historically been highly correlated. Based on cash flow
models developed to reflect managements current estimate of, among other factors, prepayments,
defaults, deferment, forbearance, and interest rates, the Company currently expects future
undiscounted cash flows from these transactions will be in excess of $1.4 billion. These cash
flows consist of net spread and servicing and administrative revenue in excess of estimated cost.
However, due to the unintended consequences of government intervention in the commercial paper
markets and limited issuances of qualifying financial commercial paper, the relationship between
the three-month financial commercial paper and LIBOR rates has
been distorted and volatile. Such distortion has had and may continue to have a significant impact
on the earnings and cash flows of this portfolio.
Eliminate Exposure to Liquidity Risk and Unfunded Debt
Burden
The Companys FFELP warehouse facility that expires in
May 2010 provides for formula based advance
rates based on current market conditions, which require equity support to be posted to the facility
under certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $1.6 billion of student loans
in the facility, $1.4 billion borrowed under the facility, and $280.6 million posted as equity
funding support for this facility. In order to reduce exposure related to these equity support
provisions, the Company reduced the amount of loans included in the facility in the first half of
2009 by completing an asset-backed securities transaction of $294.6 million, selling $40.4 million
in student loan assets, and accessing the Departments Conduit Program. These transactions
allowed the Company to withdraw cash posted as equity funding support for the facility. As of June
30, 2009, the Company had $403.7 million of student loans in the facility, $420.9 million borrowed
under the facility, and $62.8 million posted as equity funding support.
On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into a new
$500.0 million FFELP warehouse facility with a
final maturity date of August 3, 2012. The Company plans to utilize the new facility to refinance
the remaining student loans in the Companys prior FFELP warehouse facility that expires in May
2010. Refinancing these loans will allow the Company to withdraw all remaining equity funding
support from the prior FFELP warehouse facility.
The Company purchased $34.9 million, $35.5 million,
and $102.6 million of its 5.125% Senior Notes
due 2010 (the 2010 Notes) for $26.8 million, $31.1 million, and $102.6 million during the first
and second quarters of 2009 and July 2009, respectively. These transactions resulted in the
Company recognizing gains of $8.1 million and $4.4 million in the first and second quarters of
2009, respectively. The $102.6 million in notes purchased in July 2009 were purchased at par.
Subsequent to these transactions, the Company has $102.0 million of 2010 Notes outstanding.
Reposition Asset Generation Business
In August 2008, the Department implemented the Loan
Purchase Commitment Program and the Loan
Purchase Participation Program pursuant to ECASLA. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $1.7
billion of FFELP loans funded using the Participation Program, which are classified as held for
sale on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. These loans are expected to be sold to the
Department under its Purchase Program during 2009. Upon selling the $1.7 billion in loans held for
sale, the Company expects to recognize a gain of approximately $31 million to $34 million. The
Company plans to continue to use the Participation and Purchase Programs to fund loans originated
through the 2009-2010 academic year. The Company is also further repositioning its student loan
asset generation business in view of the legislative developments discussed below.
Legislation
On February 26, 2009, the President introduced several
proposals related to the fiscal year 2010
Federal budget, including a proposal for the elimination of the FFEL Program and a recommendation
that all new student loan originations be funded through the Direct Loan Program, with loan
servicing to be provided by private sector companies through performance-based contracts with the
Department. On April 29, 2009, Congress passed a budget resolution including the Presidents
proposal to eliminate the FFEL Program using the budget reconciliation procedure. In the
reconciliation instructions, both the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
and the House Committee on Education and Labor shall report out for consideration by the Senate and
House, respectively, no later than October 15, 2009, changes to the budget which will reduce the
deficit by $1 billion for fiscal years 2009 through 2014. The resolution also includes non-binding
language to maintain a competitive private sector role in the student loan program. On May 7,
2009, the President released the detailed fiscal year 2010 Federal budget, which the Department of
Education has indicated reflects the elimination of the FFEL Program for loans originated on or
after July 1, 2010.
32
On July 21, 2009, the House Committee on Education and
Labor approved the Student Aid Reform and
Fiscal Responsibility Act (SAFRA), which would eliminate the FFEL Program and require that after
July 1, 2010 all new federal student loans be made through the Direct Loan Program. It is
currently expected that the full House will consider the legislation in September 2009. The Senate
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions has not released a timeline for its
consideration of the proposed legislation, but it is expected that they will begin considering
student loan legislation no earlier than September. In addition to the Houses proposal, there are
several other proposals for changes to the education financing framework that may be considered as
the legislation moves forward. These include a possible extension of ECASLA, which expires on July
1, 2010, and the Student Loan Community Proposal, a proposal endorsed by a cross-section of FFELP
service providers (including the Company) as an alternative to the 100% federal direct lending
proposal reflected in SAFRA.
Elimination of the FFEL Program would impact the
Companys operations and profitability by, among
other things, reducing the Companys interest revenues as a result of the inability to add new
FFELP loans to the Companys portfolio and reducing guarantee and third-party servicing fees as a
result of reduced FFELP loan servicing and origination volume. Additionally, the elimination of the
FFEL Program would reduce education loan software sales and related consulting fees received from
lenders using the Companys software products and services. The fair value and/or recoverability
of the Companys goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets related to these
activities could be
adversely affected if the FFEL Program is eliminated. As discussed previously, in recent years, the
Company has expanded products and services generated from businesses that are not dependent upon
the FFEL Program, thereby reducing legislative and political risk.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Companys operating results are primarily driven by the performance of its existing portfolio,
the cost necessary to generate new assets, the revenues generated by its fee based businesses, and
the cost to provide those services. The performance of the Companys portfolio is driven by net
interest income and losses related to credit quality of the assets along with the cost to
administer and service the assets and related debt.
Net Interest Income
The Company generates a significant portion of its earnings from the spread, referred to as its
student loan spread, between the yield the Company receives on its student loan portfolio and the
cost of funding these loans. This spread income is reported on the Companys consolidated
statements of operations as net interest income. The amortization of loan premiums, including
capitalized costs of origination, the 1.05% per year consolidation loan rebate fee paid to the
Department, and yield adjustments from borrower benefit programs, are netted against loan interest
income on the Companys statements of operations. The amortization of debt issuance costs is
included in interest expense on the Companys statements of operations.
The Companys portfolio of FFELP loans originated prior to April 1, 2006 earns interest at the
higher of a variable rate based on the special allowance payment (SAP) formula set by the
Department of Education and the borrower rate. The SAP formula is based on an applicable index
plus a fixed spread that is dependent upon when the loan was originated, the loans repayment
status, and funding sources for the loan. As a result of one of the provisions of the Higher
Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 (HERA), the Companys portfolio of FFELP loans originated on
or after April 1, 2006 earns interest at a variable rate based on the SAP formula. For the
portfolio of loans originated on or after April 1, 2006, when the borrower rate exceeds the
variable rate based on the SAP formula, the Company must return the excess to the Department.
In September 2007, the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 (the College Cost Reduction
Act) was enacted into law. This legislation reduced the annual yield on FFELP loans originated
after October 1, 2007 and should be considered when reviewing the Companys results of operations.
The Company has mitigated some of the reduction in annual yield by creating efficiencies and
lowering costs, modifying borrower benefits, and reducing loan acquisition costs.
Because the Company generates a significant portion of its earnings from its student loan spread,
the interest rate sensitivity of the Companys balance sheet is very important to its operations.
The current and future interest rate environment can and will affect the Companys interest
earnings, net interest income, and net income. The effects of changing interest rate environments
are further outlined in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk.
Investment interest income, which is a component of net interest income, includes income from
unrestricted interest-earning deposits and funds in the Companys special purpose entities which
are utilized for its asset-backed securitizations.
Net interest income also includes interest expense on unsecured debt offerings. The proceeds from
these unsecured debt offerings were used by the Company to fund general business operations,
certain asset and business acquisitions, and the repurchase of stock under the Companys stock
repurchase plan.
33
Provision for Loan Losses
Management estimates and establishes an allowance for loan losses through a provision charged to
expense. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the collectibility of
the loan principal is unlikely. Recovery of amounts previously charged off is credited to the
allowance for loan losses. Management maintains the allowance for federally insured and
non-federally insured loans at a level believed to be adequate to provide for estimated probable
credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective because it
requires estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. The Company analyzes the
allowance separately for its federally insured loans and its non-federally insured loans.
The allowance for the federally insured loan portfolio is based on periodic evaluations of the
Companys loan portfolios considering past experience, trends in student loan claims rejected for
payment by guarantors, changes to federal student loan programs, current economic conditions, and
other relevant factors. The federal government currently guarantees 97% of the principal of and the
interest on federally insured student loans disbursed on and after July 1, 2006 (and 98% for those
loans disbursed prior to July 1, 2006), which limits the Companys loss exposure on the outstanding
balance of the Companys federally insured portfolio. Also, in accordance with the Student Loan
Reform Act of 1993, student loans disbursed prior to October 1, 1993 are fully insured.
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on the non-federally insured loans,
the Company considers several factors including: loans in repayment versus those in a nonpaying
status, months in repayment, delinquency status, type of program, and trends in defaults in the
portfolio based on Company and industry data. The Company places a non-federally insured loan on
nonaccrual status when the collection of principal and interest is 30 days past due and charges off
the loan when the collection of principal and interest is 120 days past due.
Other Income
The Company also earns fees and generates revenue from other sources, including loan and guaranty
servicing, enrollment services, payment management activities, and fees from providing software and
technical services.
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing Revenue Loan servicing fees are determined according to
individual agreements with customers and are calculated based on the dollar value of loans, number
of loans, or number of borrowers serviced for each customer. Guaranty servicing fees, generally,
are calculated based on the number of loans serviced, volume of loans serviced, or amounts
collected. Revenue is recognized when earned pursuant to applicable agreements, and when ultimate
collection is assured.
Enrollment
Services Revenue Enrollment services revenue includes the sale of lists and print
products, subscription-based products and services, and multiple deliverable arrangements. Revenue
from the sale of lists and printed products is generally earned and recognized, net of estimated
returns, upon shipment or delivery. Revenues from the sales of subscription-based products and
services are recognized ratably over the term of the subscription. Subscription revenue received
or receivable in advance of the delivery of services is included in deferred revenue. Revenue from
multiple deliverable arrangements is recognized separately for separate units of accounting based
on the units relative fair value.
Tuition
Payment Processing and Campus Commerce Revenue Tuition payment processing and campus
commerce revenue includes actively managed tuition payment solutions, online payment processing,
detailed information reporting, and data integration services. Fees for these payment management
services are recognized over the period in which services are provided to customers.
Software
Services Revenue Software services revenue is determined from individual agreements with
customers and includes license and maintenance fees associated with student loan software products.
Computer and software consulting services are recognized over the period in which services are
provided to customers.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses includes indirect costs incurred to generate and acquire student loans, costs
incurred to manage and administer the Companys student loan portfolio and its financing
transactions, costs incurred to service the Companys student loan portfolio and the portfolios of
third parties, the cost to provide enrollment services, costs incurred to provide tuition payment
processing, campus commerce, content management, recruitment, software and technical services to
third parties, the depreciation and amortization of capital assets and intangible assets,
investments in products, services, and technology to meet customer needs and support continued
revenue growth, and other general and administrative expenses. The cost to provide enrollment
services consists of costs incurred to provide lead generation and publishing and editing services
in the Companys Enrollment Services operating segment. Operating expenses also includes employee
termination benefits, lease termination costs, and the write-down of certain assets related to the
Companys restructuring initiatives.
34
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan interest |
|
$ |
160,413 |
|
|
|
296,686 |
|
|
|
(136,273 |
) |
|
|
(45.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
331,332 |
|
|
|
626,672 |
|
|
|
(295,340 |
) |
|
|
(47.1 |
)% |
Investment interest |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
(6,340 |
) |
|
|
(69.5 |
) |
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
20,796 |
|
|
|
(13,929 |
) |
|
|
(67.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
163,189 |
|
|
|
305,802 |
|
|
|
(142,613 |
) |
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
338,199 |
|
|
|
647,468 |
|
|
|
(309,269 |
) |
|
|
(47.8 |
) |
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on bonds and notes payable |
|
|
106,082 |
|
|
|
232,464 |
|
|
|
(126,382 |
) |
|
|
(54.4 |
) |
|
|
252,584 |
|
|
|
557,605 |
|
|
|
(305,021 |
) |
|
|
(54.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
57,107 |
|
|
|
73,338 |
|
|
|
(16,231 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
85,615 |
|
|
|
89,863 |
|
|
|
(4,248 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
49,107 |
|
|
|
67,338 |
|
|
|
(18,231 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
70,115 |
|
|
|
78,863 |
|
|
|
(8,748 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to 2008 as a result of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loan
interest margin, excluding derivative settlements (a) |
|
$ |
25,443 |
|
|
|
64,939 |
|
|
|
(39,496 |
) |
|
|
(60.8 |
)% |
|
$ |
28,043 |
|
|
|
70,483 |
|
|
|
(42,440 |
) |
|
|
(60.2 |
)% |
Fixed rate floor income (b) |
|
|
37,054 |
|
|
|
9,890 |
|
|
|
27,164 |
|
|
|
274.7 |
|
|
|
67,339 |
|
|
|
18,410 |
|
|
|
48,929 |
|
|
|
265.8 |
|
Investment interest (c) |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
(6,340 |
) |
|
|
(69.5 |
) |
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
20,796 |
|
|
|
(13,929 |
) |
|
|
(67.0 |
) |
Corporate debt interest expense (d) |
|
|
(8,166 |
) |
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(16,634 |
) |
|
|
(19,826 |
) |
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
57,107 |
|
|
|
73,338 |
|
|
|
(16,231 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
85,615 |
|
|
|
89,863 |
|
|
|
(4,248 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Student loan interest margin, excluding derivative settlements, decreased for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 as a result of a
decrease in the Companys variable student loan spread, excluding derivative settlements, as
discussed in this Item 2 under Asset Generation and Management Operating Segment Results of
Operations. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
variable student loan spread, excluding derivative settlements, was
0.45% and 1.07%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, variable student loan spread, excluding derivative
settlements, was 0.27% and 0.65%, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
The Company has a portfolio of student loans that are earning interest at a fixed borrower
rate which exceeds the statutorily defined variable lender rate creating fixed rate floor
income. Due to lower interest rates in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the same periods in 2008, the Company received additional fixed rate floor income on a
portion of its student loan portfolio. See Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk Interest Rate Risk for additional information. |
|
(c) |
|
Investment interest decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008 due to lower interest rates in 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
Corporate debt interest expense decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same periods in 2008 as a result of a decrease in interest rates, as well as a
reduction in debt outstanding due to the purchase of unsecured fixed rate debt. The weighted
average interest rate and notes outstanding on the Companys unsecured line of credit was
0.80% and $691.5 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 compared to 2.90% and $450.0
million, respectively, as of June 30, 2008. During the first and second quarters of 2009, the
Company purchased $34.9 million and $35.5 million, respectively, of its 5.125% Senior Notes
due 2010. |
|
|
The provision for loan losses increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to 2008 primarily due to increases in delinquencies. |
35
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
$ |
28,803 |
|
|
|
23,821 |
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
$ |
55,274 |
|
|
|
48,482 |
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce
revenue |
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
14,183 |
|
|
|
(2,359 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
11,527 |
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
|
|
5,402 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
28,389 |
|
|
|
12,379 |
|
|
|
16,010 |
|
|
|
129.3 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(508.3 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
|
|
47,024 |
|
|
|
(99.2 |
) |
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
(49,768 |
) |
|
|
(315.9 |
) |
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
|
|
(41,606 |
) |
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
|
114.9 |
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
45,200 |
|
|
|
(11,307 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
$ |
62,370 |
|
|
|
92,503 |
|
|
|
(30,133 |
) |
|
|
(32.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
174,989 |
|
|
|
108,619 |
|
|
|
66,370 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue increased due to an increase in FFELP loan
servicing revenue and guaranty servicing revenue as further discussed in this Item 2 under
Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing Operating Segment Results of Operations. |
|
|
|
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue increased due to an increase in
the number of managed tuition payment plans and an increase in campus commerce transactions
processed. |
|
|
|
|
Enrollment services revenue increased due to an increase in the number of lead
generation transactions processed offset by a reduction in other
enrollment products and services offered as further discussed in this Item 2 under Enrollment
Services Operating Segment Results of Operations. |
|
|
|
|
Software and technical services revenue decreased for the six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period in 2008 as the result of a reduction in the number of
projects for existing customers and the loss of customers due to the legislative
developments in the student loan industry throughout 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Other income increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
2008 due to gains of $5.8 million and $13.9 million from the purchase of debt in the first
and second quarters of 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company received a contingency
payment in the first quarter of 2009 from the sale of an equity method investment, which
resulted in a $3.5 million gain. |
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized a loss of $47.5 million during the first quarter of 2008 as a
result of the sale of $1.3 billion of student loans as further discussed in this Item 2
under Asset Generation and Management Operating Segment Results of Operations. |
|
|
|
|
The change in derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments
was caused by the change in the fair value of the Companys derivative portfolio and
foreign currency rate fluctuations which are further discussed in Item 3, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
|
|
|
|
Further detail of the components of derivative settlements is included in Item 3,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. The Company maintains an
overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to
reduce the economic effect of interest rate volatility. Management has structured all of
the Companys derivative transactions with the intent that each is economically effective;
however, the Companys derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133. Derivative settlements for each applicable period should be evaluated with
the Companys net interest income. |
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
$ |
38,699 |
|
|
|
43,739 |
|
|
|
(5,040 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
76,925 |
|
|
|
91,678 |
|
|
|
(14,753 |
) |
|
|
(16.1 |
)% |
Other expenses |
|
|
37,277 |
|
|
|
39,793 |
|
|
|
(2,516 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
73,829 |
|
|
|
78,977 |
|
|
|
(5,148 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, excluding the cost
to provide enrollment services and
restructure and impairment expenses |
|
|
75,976 |
|
|
|
83,532 |
|
|
$ |
(7,556 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
)% |
|
|
150,754 |
|
|
|
170,655 |
|
|
$ |
(19,901 |
) |
|
|
(11.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure expense |
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
7,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
97,356 |
|
|
|
97,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
189,927 |
|
|
|
226,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Excluding the cost to provide enrollment services and restructuring and impairment charges,
operating expenses decreased $7.6 million (9.0%) and $19.9 million (11.7%) for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
These decreases were the result
of continued focus by the Company on managing costs and gaining efficiencies and continued benefits
from prior restructuring activities.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was 41.9% and 39.0% for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, compared to 31.0% for the same periods in 2008. The 2008 effective tax rates were lower than
the 2009 rates due to the Company recognizing a year-to-date tax benefit in 2008 which was reduced
by various state gross receipts taxes and other items which were not deductible for tax purposes.
The year-to-date tax benefit in 2008 was the result of a significant loss incurred by the Company during the
first quarter of 2008 as a result of a sale of loans. The effective tax rate during the second
quarter of 2009 increased as compared to the first quarter of 2009 due to various state tax law
changes and the increase in other items which are not deductible for tax purposes.
Additional information on the Companys results of operations is included with the discussion of
the Companys operating segments in this Item 2 under Operating Segments.
Financial Condition as of June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
23,889,571 |
|
|
|
25,413,008 |
|
|
|
(1,523,437 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
)% |
Student loans receivable held for sale |
|
|
1,749,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,749,290 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments |
|
|
1,490,434 |
|
|
|
1,348,104 |
|
|
|
142,330 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
175,178 |
|
|
|
175,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
65,115 |
|
|
|
77,054 |
|
|
|
(11,939 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
168,720 |
|
|
|
175,174 |
|
|
|
(6,454 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
572,234 |
|
|
|
666,379 |
|
|
|
(94,145 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
28,110,542 |
|
|
|
27,854,897 |
|
|
|
255,645 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes payable |
|
$ |
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
26,787,959 |
|
|
|
381,614 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
5,539 |
|
|
|
305.2 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
252,428 |
|
|
|
421,897 |
|
|
|
(169,469 |
) |
|
|
(40.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
27,429,355 |
|
|
|
27,211,671 |
|
|
|
217,684 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
681,187 |
|
|
|
643,226 |
|
|
|
37,961 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
28,110,542 |
|
|
|
27,854,897 |
|
|
|
255,645 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys total assets increased during 2009 primarily due to an increase in student loans
receivable as a result of loan originations and acquisitions, net of repayments and participations
as further discussed in this Item 2 under Asset Generation and Management Operating Segment
Results of Operations. Total liabilities increased primarily due to an increase in bonds and notes
payable as a result of an increase in student loan funding obligations in order to fund the
increase in the Companys student loan portfolio.
37
OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company has five operating segments as defined in SFAS No. 131 as follows: Student Loan and
Guaranty Servicing, Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce, Enrollment Services, Software
and Technical Services, and Asset Generation and Management. The Companys operating segments are
defined by the products and services they offer or the types of customers they serve, and they
reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by management. The
accounting policies of the Companys operating segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies included in the Companys consolidated financial
statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. Intersegment revenues are charged by a segment to another segment that provides the product
or service. Intersegment revenues and expenses are included within each segment consistent with
the income statement presentation provided to management. Changes in management structure or
allocation methodologies and procedures may result in changes in reported segment financial
information.
The management reporting process measures the performance of the Companys operating segments based
on the management structure of the Company as well as the methodology used by management to
evaluate performance and allocate resources. Management, including the
Companys chief operating decision maker, evaluates the performance of the Companys operating
segments based on their profitability. As discussed further below, management measures the
profitability of the Companys operating segments on the basis of base net income. Accordingly,
information regarding the Companys operating segments is provided based on base net income. The
Companys base net income is not a defined term within GAAP and may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Unlike financial accounting, there is no
comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management reporting.
Historically, the Company generated the majority of its revenue from net interest income earned in
its Asset Generation and Management operating segment. In recent years, the Company has made
several acquisitions that have expanded the Companys products and services and has diversified its
revenue primarily from fee-based businesses. The Company currently offers a broad range of
pre-college, in-college, and post-college products and services to students, families, schools, and
financial institutions. These products and services help students and families plan and pay for
their education and students plan their careers. The Companys products and services are designed
to simplify the education planning and financing process and are focused on providing value to
students, families, and schools throughout the education life cycle. The Company continues to look
for ways to diversify its sources of revenue, including those generated from businesses that are
not dependent upon government programs, reducing legislative and political risk.
Base net income is the primary financial performance measure used by management to develop the
Companys financial plans, track results, and establish corporate performance targets and incentive
compensation. While base net income is not a substitute for reported results under GAAP, the
Company relies on base net income in operating its business because base net income permits
management to make meaningful period-to-period comparisons of the operational and performance
indicators that are most closely assessed by management. Management believes this information
provides additional insight into the financial performance of the core business activities of the
Companys operating segments.
Accordingly, the tables presented below reflect base net income which is reviewed and utilized by
management to manage the business for each of the Companys operating segments. Reconciliation of
the segment totals to the Companys consolidated operating results in accordance with GAAP are also
included in the tables below. Included below under Non-GAAP Performance Measures is further
discussion regarding base net income and its limitations, including a table that details the
differences between base net income and GAAP net income by operating segment.
38
Segment Results and Reconciliations to GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
156,233 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
163,189 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,338 |
|
|
|
8,166 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
57,895 |
|
|
|
(6,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
57,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
49,895 |
|
|
|
(6,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
49,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,803 |
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,194 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
Other income |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,527 |
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
20,888 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
25,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
|
|
(33,577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
51,246 |
|
|
|
11,901 |
|
|
|
29,024 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
101,261 |
|
|
|
13,580 |
|
|
|
15,119 |
|
|
|
(33,577 |
) |
|
|
(34,013 |
) |
|
|
62,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
|
|
31,335 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,180 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
terminination costs |
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
11,140 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
17,358 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
8,259 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
39,084 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
20,732 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
(32,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36,492 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
27,504 |
|
|
|
7,739 |
|
|
|
81,145 |
|
|
|
28,342 |
|
|
|
15,661 |
|
|
|
(33,577 |
) |
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
97,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
20,140 |
|
|
|
35,133 |
|
|
|
(7,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,756 |
) |
|
|
14,121 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
(5,612 |
) |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
(7,654 |
) |
|
|
(13,351 |
) |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
(5,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,155 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
(6,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,609 |
) |
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Income taxes are applied based on 38% of income (loss) before
income taxes for the individual operating segments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin
excluding net interest income for fee-based
businesses, restructure expense, and the revenue and
expenses associated with rehabiliation loan sales |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin
excluding net interest income for fee-based
businesses, restructure expense, and the revenue
and expenses associated with rehabilitation loan sales |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
282,293 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
305,802 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
222,402 |
|
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
59,891 |
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
73,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
53,891 |
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
67,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
23,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,664 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,821 |
|
Tutition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
Other income |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Intercompany revenue |
|
|
18,382 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
19,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
(33,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,201 |
) |
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
43,135 |
|
|
|
10,194 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
|
85,810 |
|
|
|
16,694 |
|
|
|
15,228 |
|
|
|
(33,783 |
) |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
92,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
12,491 |
|
|
|
5,784 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
29,350 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
12,828 |
|
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
43,549 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
8,011 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
14,921 |
|
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
39,618 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
12,205 |
|
|
|
18,952 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
(32,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
30,220 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
25,222 |
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
69,988 |
|
|
|
25,949 |
|
|
|
28,457 |
|
|
|
(33,783 |
) |
|
|
7,311 |
|
|
|
97,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
|
|
44,636 |
|
|
|
(22,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,170 |
|
|
|
61,919 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
(6,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
19,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
|
|
(15,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,987 |
|
|
|
42,724 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,079 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
|
|
(15,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,968 |
|
|
|
43,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income taxes are applied
based on the consolidated effective tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. |
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
328,820 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
338,199 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,932 |
|
|
|
16,634 |
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
91,888 |
|
|
|
(13,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
85,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
76,388 |
|
|
|
(13,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
70,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
56,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,274 |
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
Other income |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
8,892 |
|
|
|
19,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,389 |
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
40,766 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
7,020 |
|
|
|
48,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,384 |
|
|
|
(65,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
98,964 |
|
|
|
27,496 |
|
|
|
57,795 |
|
|
|
17,044 |
|
|
|
201,299 |
|
|
|
42,383 |
|
|
|
35,757 |
|
|
|
(65,557 |
) |
|
|
(38,893 |
) |
|
|
174,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
12,947 |
|
|
|
11,958 |
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
|
|
63,864 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
12,501 |
|
|
|
(1,628 |
) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
78,406 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
19,737 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
32,336 |
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
|
18,720 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
|
|
75,636 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
18,954 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
22,709 |
|
|
|
38,608 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
(62,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
69,263 |
|
|
|
18,986 |
|
|
|
55,233 |
|
|
|
14,247 |
|
|
|
157,729 |
|
|
|
52,952 |
|
|
|
32,705 |
|
|
|
(65,557 |
) |
|
|
12,098 |
|
|
|
189,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
29,780 |
|
|
|
8,551 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
43,690 |
|
|
|
65,819 |
|
|
|
(10,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,489 |
) |
|
|
55,177 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
(11,317 |
) |
|
|
(3,249 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
(16,603 |
) |
|
|
(25,012 |
) |
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,961 |
|
|
|
(21,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,463 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
27,087 |
|
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
|
(7,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,528 |
) |
|
|
33,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Income taxes are applied based on 38% of income (loss) before
income taxes for the individual operating segments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin
excluding net interest income for fee-based
businesses, restructure expense, and the revenue and
expenses associated with rehabiliation loan sales |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin
excluding net interest income for fee-based
businesses, restructure expense, impairment expense, the
loss on sale of loans, and the revenue and expenses
associated with rehabilitation loan sales |
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
54.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fee-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
Fee- |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
to GAAP |
|
|
Results of |
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Based |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
856 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
602,651 |
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
647,468 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
538,417 |
|
|
|
19,826 |
|
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
557,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
64,234 |
|
|
|
(17,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
89,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
53,234 |
|
|
|
(17,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,745 |
|
|
|
78,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
48,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,320 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,482 |
|
Tutition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
14,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,183 |
|
Other income |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,379 |
|
Loss on sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
38,606 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
42,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,172 |
|
|
|
(73,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,072 |
) |
|
|
(41,606 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,965 |
) |
|
|
45,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
89,499 |
|
|
|
24,301 |
|
|
|
53,327 |
|
|
|
14,944 |
|
|
|
182,071 |
|
|
|
18,075 |
|
|
|
33,805 |
|
|
|
(73,295 |
) |
|
|
(52,037 |
) |
|
|
108,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
26,489 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
|
|
9,870 |
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
27,419 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
97,392 |
|
Restructure expense- severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
(7,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment expense |
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
9,351 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,834 |
|
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
16,498 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
5,289 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
27,731 |
|
|
|
10,439 |
|
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
13,121 |
|
|
|
80,375 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
23,100 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
28,020 |
|
|
|
39,554 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
(69,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
71,908 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
|
|
52,052 |
|
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
152,991 |
|
|
|
65,366 |
|
|
|
66,530 |
|
|
|
(73,295 |
) |
|
|
15,167 |
|
|
|
226,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
18,447 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
31,019 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
(49,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,459 |
) |
|
|
(39,277 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit (a) |
|
|
5,719 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
(15,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,202 |
) |
|
|
(12,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
|
12,728 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
(34,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,257 |
) |
|
|
(27,101 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,728 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
(34,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,276 |
) |
|
|
(26,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income taxes are applied
based on the consolidated effective tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. |
42
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
In accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the
Company prepares financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
In addition to evaluating the Companys GAAP-based financial information, management also evaluates
the Companys operating segments on a non-GAAP performance measure referred to as base net income
for each operating segment. While base net income is not a substitute for reported results under
GAAP, the Company relies on base net income to manage each operating segment because management
believes these measures provide additional information regarding the operational and performance
indicators that are most closely assessed by management.
Base net income is the primary financial performance measure used by management to develop
financial plans, allocate resources, track results, evaluate performance, establish corporate
performance targets, and determine incentive compensation. Accordingly, financial information is
reported to management on a base net income basis by operating segment, as these are the measures
used regularly by the Companys chief operating decision maker. The Companys board of directors
utilizes base net income to set performance targets and evaluate managements performance. The
Company also believes analysts, rating agencies, and creditors use base net income in their
evaluation of the Companys results of operations. While base net income is not a substitute for
reported results under GAAP, the Company utilizes base net income in operating its business
because base net income permits management to make meaningful period-to-period comparisons by
eliminating the temporary volatility in the Companys performance that arises from certain items
that are primarily affected by factors beyond the control of management. Management believes base
net income provides additional insight into the financial performance of the core business
activities of the Companys operations.
Limitations of Base Net Income
While GAAP provides a uniform, comprehensive basis of accounting, for the reasons discussed above,
management believes that base net income is an important additional tool for providing a more
complete understanding of the Companys results of operations. Nevertheless, base net income is
subject to certain general and specific limitations that investors should carefully consider. For
example, as stated above, unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative
guidance for management reporting. The Companys base net income is not a defined term within
GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Investors, therefore, may not be able to compare the Companys performance with that of other
companies based upon base net income. Base net income results are only meant to supplement
GAAP results by providing additional information regarding the operational and performance
indicators that are most closely monitored and used by the Companys management and board of
directors to assess performance and information which the Company believes is important to
analysts, rating agencies, and creditors.
Other limitations of base net income arise from the specific adjustments that management makes to
GAAP results to derive base net income results. These differences are described below.
43
The adjustments required to reconcile from the Companys base net income measure to its GAAP
results of operations relate to differing treatments for derivatives, foreign currency transaction
adjustments, and certain other items that management does not consider in evaluating the Companys
operating results. The following table reflects adjustments associated with these areas by
operating segment and Corporate Activity and Overhead:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
Tuition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
and Campus |
|
|
Enrollment |
|
|
Technical |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Commerce |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,445 |
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
34,013 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
2,701 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,042 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax effect (a) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(11,173 |
) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(14,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
18,230 |
|
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
19,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,866 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(15,755 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,561 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,726 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
Net tax effect (a) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(965 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(21,108 |
) |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
(16,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,325 |
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
38,893 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
3,756 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,502 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax effect (a) |
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(12,800 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(16,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
20,023 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
26,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and
put option adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,534 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
42,072 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,121 |
|
Compensation related to business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,780 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
Net tax effect (a) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(3,378 |
) |
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
(8,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to GAAP |
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
17,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For 2009, income taxes are applied based on 38% of income (loss) before income taxes for the
individual operating segments. For 2008, income taxes for each individual operating segment
are applied based on the consolidated effective tax rate. |
Differences between GAAP and Base Net Income
Managements financial planning and evaluation of operating results does not take into account the
following items because their volatility and/or inherent uncertainty affect the period-to-period
comparability of the Companys results of operations. A more detailed discussion of the
differences between GAAP and base net income follows.
44
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments: Base net income excludes
the periodic unrealized gains and losses that are caused by the change in fair value on derivatives
used in the Companys risk management strategy in which the Company does not qualify for hedge
treatment under GAAP. SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
requires that changes in fair value of derivative instruments be recognized currently in earnings
unless specific hedge accounting criteria, as specified by SFAS No. 133, are met. The Company
maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative
instruments to reduce the economic effect of interest rate volatility. Derivative instruments
primarily used by the Company include interest rate swaps, basis swaps, and cross-currency interest
rate swaps. Management has structured all of the Companys derivative transactions with the intent
that each is economically effective. However, the Company does not qualify its derivatives for
hedge treatment as defined by SFAS No. 133, and the stand-alone derivative must be
marked-to-market in the income statement with no consideration for the corresponding change in fair
value of the hedged item. The Company believes these point-in-time estimates of asset and
liability values that are subject to interest rate fluctuations make it difficult to evaluate the
ongoing results of operations against its business plan and affect the period-to-period
comparability of the results of operations. Included in base net income are the economic effects
of the Companys derivative instruments, which includes any cash paid or received being recognized
as an expense or revenue upon actual derivative settlements. These settlements are included in
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments and derivative settlements,
net on the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
Base net income excludes the foreign currency transaction gains or losses caused by the
re-measurement of the Companys Euro-denominated bonds to U.S. dollars. In connection with the
issuance of the Euro-denominated bonds, the Company has entered into cross-currency interest rate
swaps. Under the terms of these agreements, the principal payments on the Euro-denominated notes
will effectively be paid at the exchange rate in effect at the issuance date of the bonds. The
cross-currency interest rate swaps also convert the floating rate paid on the Euro-denominated
bonds (EURIBOR index) to an index based on LIBOR. Included in base net income are the economic
effects of any cash paid or received being recognized as an expense or revenue upon actual
settlements of the cross-currency interest rate swaps. These settlements are included in
Derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments and derivative settlements,
net on the Companys consolidated statements of operations. However, the gains or losses caused
by the re-measurement of the Euro-denominated bonds to U.S. dollars and the change in market value
of the cross-currency interest rate swaps are excluded from base net income as the Company
believes the point-in-time estimates of value that are subject to currency rate fluctuations
related to these financial instruments make it difficult to evaluate the ongoing results of
operations against the Companys business plan and affect the period-to-period comparability of the
results of operations. The re-measurement of the Euro-denominated
bonds generally correlates with the change
in fair value of the cross-currency interest rate swaps. However, the Company will experience
unrealized gains or losses related to the cross-currency interest rate swaps if the two underlying
indices (and related forward curve) do not move in parallel.
In 2008, base net income also excluded the change in fair value of put options issued by the
Company for certain business acquisitions. The put options were valued by the Company each
reporting period using a Black-Scholes pricing model. Therefore, the fair value of those options
were primarily affected by the strike price and term of the underlying option, the Companys stock
price, and the dividend yield and volatility of the Companys stock. The Company believed those
point-in-time estimates of value that were subject to fluctuations made it difficult to evaluate
the ongoing results of operations against the Companys business plans and affected the
period-to-period comparability of the results of operations. In 2008, the Company settled all of
its obligations related to these put options.
The gains and/or losses included in Derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option
adjustments and derivative settlements, net on the Companys consolidated statements of operations
are primarily caused by interest rate and currency volatility, changes in the value of put options
based on the inputs used in the Black-Scholes pricing model, as well as the volume and terms of put
options and of derivatives not receiving hedge treatment. Base net income excludes these
unrealized gains and losses and isolates the effect of interest rate, currency, and put option
volatility on the fair value of such instruments during the period. Under GAAP, the effects of
these factors on the fair value of the put options and the derivative instruments (but not the
underlying hedged item) tend to show more volatility in the short term.
Amortization of intangible assets: Base net income excludes the amortization of acquired
intangibles, which arises primarily from the acquisition of definite life intangible assets in
connection with the Companys acquisitions, since the Company feels that such charges do not drive
the Companys operating performance on a long-term basis and can affect the period-to-period
comparability of the results of operations.
Compensation related to business combinations: The Company has structured certain business
combinations in which the consideration paid has been dependent on the sellers continued
employment with the Company. As such, the value of the consideration paid is recognized as
compensation expense by the Company over the term of the applicable employment agreement. Base
net income excludes this expense because the Company believes such charges do not drive its
operating performance on a long-term basis and can affect the period-to-period comparability of the
results of operations. If the Company did not enter into the employment agreements in connection
with the acquisition, the amount paid to these former shareholders of the acquired entity would have been recorded by the
Company as additional consideration of the acquired entity, thus, not having an effect on the
Companys results of operations.
45
Variable-rate floor income, net of settlements on derivatives: Loans that reset annually on July 1
can generate excess spread income compared with the rate based on the special allowance payment
formula in declining interest rate environments. The Company refers to this additional income as
variable-rate floor income. The Company excludes variable-rate floor income, net of settlements
paid on derivatives used to hedge student loan assets earning variable-rate floor income, from its
base net income since the timing and amount of variable-rate floor income (if any) is uncertain,
it has been eliminated by legislation for all loans originated on and after April 1, 2006, and it
is in excess of expected spreads. In addition, because variable-rate floor income is subject to
the underlying rate for the subject loans being reset annually on July 1, it is a factor beyond the
Companys control which can affect the period-to-period comparability of results of operations.
Prior to October 1, 2008, variable rate floor income was calculated by the Company on a statutory
maximum basis. However, as a result of the disruption in the capital markets beginning in August
2007, the full benefit of variable rate floor income calculated on a statutory maximum basis has
not been realized by the Company due to the widening of the spread between short term interest rate
indices and the Companys actual cost of funds. As a result of the ongoing volatility of interest
rates, effective October 1, 2008, the Company changed its calculation of variable rate floor income
to better reflect the economic benefit received by the Company. The economic benefit received by
the Company related to variable rate floor income was $6.0 million and $19.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $7.5 million and $25.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Variable rate floor income calculated on a
statutory maximum basis was $13.0 million and $21.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, and $23.8 million and $40.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Beginning October 1, 2008, the economic benefit received by the
Company has been used to determine base net income.
The Company has used derivative instruments to hedge variable rate floor income during certain periods.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made
payments (settlements of) of $7.2 million
and $10.0 million, respectively, on such derivatives. These settlements are netted with variable-rate floor income and are excluded from base net income.
STUDENT LOAN AND GUARANTY SERVICING OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing operating segment provides for the servicing of the
Companys student loan portfolio and the portfolios of third parties and servicing provided to
guaranty agencies. The servicing and business process outsourcing activities include loan
origination activities, application processing, borrower updates, payment processing, due diligence
procedures, and claim processing. These activities are performed internally for the Companys
portfolio in addition to generating fee revenue when performed for third-party clients. The
guaranty servicing, servicing support, and business process outsourcing activities include
providing software and data center services, borrower and loan updates, default aversion tracking
services, claim processing services, and post-default collection services to guaranty agencies.
Loan servicing fees are determined according to individual agreements with customers and are
calculated based on the dollar value of loans, number of loans, or number of borrowers serviced for
each customer. In addition, the Company earns servicing revenue for the origination of loans.
Guaranty servicing fees, generally, are calculated based on the number of loans serviced, volume of
loans serviced, or amounts collected.
In June 2009, the Department of Education named the Company as one of four private sector servicers
awarded a servicing contract to service student loans. The contract specifically covers the
servicing of all federally-owned student loans, including the servicing of FFELP loans purchased by
the Department pursuant to the ECASLA. The Company
expects the contract to begin on or around August 31, 2009 and span five years with one, five-year
renewal option. Beginning in August 2010, the contract will also cover the servicing on new loans
originated under the Direct Loan Program. Service volume will initially be allocated by the
Department to servicers awarded a contract, however, performance factors such as customer
satisfaction levels and default rates will determine volume allocations over time. Servicing loans
under this contract will increase revenue earned by this segment. However, operating margins under
this contract are expected to be lower than historical levels achieved.
46
Student Loan Servicing Volumes (dollars in millions)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of June 30, 2009, the Company is servicing $1.7 billion of loans owned by the Company
and $1.3 billion of loans for third parties that were disbursed on or after May 1, 2008 and
may be eligible to be sold to the Department of Education pursuant to its Loan Purchase
Commitment Program. The Company expects to retain servicing rights on all loans sold to the
Department after September 1, 2009, which are currently being serviced by the Company.
However, the Company expects to lose servicing rights on loans sold to the Department prior to
September 1, 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes loans that are accounted for as participation interests sold under an agreement with
Union Bank. |
47
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(94.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
(90.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
23,664 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
56,037 |
|
|
|
48,320 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
4,050.0 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
850.0 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
20,888 |
|
|
|
18,382 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
40,766 |
|
|
|
38,606 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
51,246 |
|
|
|
43,135 |
|
|
|
8,111 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
98,964 |
|
|
|
89,499 |
|
|
|
9,465 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
12,491 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
26,489 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Restructure expense |
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
(2,516.3 |
) |
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
236.4 |
|
Impairment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
(5,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
11,140 |
|
|
|
8,011 |
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
19,737 |
|
|
|
16,498 |
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
18,954 |
|
|
|
23,100 |
|
|
|
(4,146 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36,492 |
|
|
|
30,220 |
|
|
|
6,272 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
69,263 |
|
|
|
71,908 |
|
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income before income taxes |
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
29,780 |
|
|
|
18,447 |
|
|
|
11,333 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,612 |
) |
|
|
(4,079 |
) |
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
(11,317 |
) |
|
|
(5,719 |
) |
|
|
(5,598 |
) |
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income |
|
$ |
9,155 |
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
18,463 |
|
|
|
12,728 |
|
|
|
5,735 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin -
excluding net interest income,
restructure expense,
impairment expense, and the revenue and
expenses
associated with rehabiliation loan sales |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income. Investment income decreased as a result of decreases in
interest rates on cash held in 2009 compared to 2008.
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue and intersegment revenue . Loan and guaranty servicing
revenue and intersegment revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 increased from
the same periods in 2008 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Origination |
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Origination |
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFELP servicing (a) |
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
|
13,852 |
|
|
|
14,310 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
11,571 |
|
|
|
12,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private servicing |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty servicing (b) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
12,842 |
|
|
|
12,879 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
9,212 |
|
|
|
9,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
28,645 |
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
22,614 |
|
|
|
23,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenue (c) |
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
19,422 |
|
|
|
20,888 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
17,716 |
|
|
|
18,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total servicing revenue |
|
$ |
2,005 |
|
|
|
48,067 |
|
|
|
50,072 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
40,330 |
|
|
|
42,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
FFELP origination revenue decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to lenders exiting the FFELP
marketplace as a result of legislative changes and disruptions in the capital markets.
FFELP servicing revenue increased due to the receipt of $1.9 million in
deconversion fees from third parties in the second quarter of 2009 related to
$155.5 million of loans deconverted as part of the Departments Loan Purchase
Commitment Program. |
|
(b) |
|
Guaranty servicing revenue increased due to the receipt of $5.8 million
in fees received from a rehabilitation sale of defaulted loan assets in the
second quarter of 2009. In the second quarter of 2008, revenue from
rehabilitation sales of defaulted loans was $2.8 million. |
|
(c) |
|
Intersegment origination revenue increased in 2009 due to an increase
in the Companys disbursement volume compared to 2008. Intersegment servicing
revenue increased due to the receipt of $1.8 million in fees in the second
quarter of 2009 earned as a result of transferring loans between various
Company financings as the Company was executing various liquidity strategies. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Origination |
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Origination |
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFELP servicing (a) |
|
$ |
775 |
|
|
|
29,321 |
|
|
|
30,096 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
23,258 |
|
|
|
24,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private servicing |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
3,867 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty servicing (b) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
21,860 |
|
|
|
22,074 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
19,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty
servicing revenue |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
54,944 |
|
|
|
56,037 |
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
46,315 |
|
|
|
48,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenue (c) |
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
36,599 |
|
|
|
40,766 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
36,430 |
|
|
|
38,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total servicing revenue |
|
$ |
5,260 |
|
|
|
91,543 |
|
|
|
96,803 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
82,745 |
|
|
|
86,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
FFELP origination revenue decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to lenders exiting the
FFELP marketplace as a result of legislative changes and disruptions in the capital markets.
FFELP servicing revenue increased due to an increase in servicing volume and the receipt of $2.1 million in deconversion fees from third
parties in 2009 related to $167.5 million of loans deconverted as part of the Departments
Loan Purchase Commitment Program. |
|
(b) |
|
Guaranty servicing revenue increased due to an increase in collection revenue, as well as the receipt of $6.2 million in fees received from
rehabilitation sales of defaulted loan assets in 2009. In 2008, the revenue from
rehabilitation sales of defaulted loans was $5.6 million. |
|
(c) |
|
Intersegment origination revenue increased in 2009 due to an increase in the Companys
disbursement volume compared to 2008. |
Operating expenses. Excluding restructure and impairment charges and collection fees paid
related to rehabilitation sales, operating expenses increased $3.4 million (10.8%) and $1.6 million
(2.5%) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008,
respectively. These increases were the result of additional costs
related to system development and maintenance, as well as costs allocated to this segment which
were included in Corporate Activity and Overhead in the prior periods.
49
TUITION PAYMENT PROCESSING AND CAMPUS COMMERCE OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Tuition Payment Processing and Campus Commerce operating segment provides products and services
to help institutions and education seeking families manage the payment of education costs during
the pre-college and college stages of the education life cycle. The Company provides actively
managed tuition payment solutions, online payment processing, detailed information reporting,
financial needs analysis, and data integration services to K-12 and higher educational
institutions, families, and students. In addition, the Company provides customer-focused
electronic transactions, information sharing, and account and bill presentment to colleges and
universities.
This segment of the Companys business is subject to seasonal fluctuations which correspond, or are
related to, the traditional school year. Tuition management revenue is recognized over the course
of the academic term, but the peak operational activities take place in summer and early fall.
Revenue associated with providing electronic commerce subscription services is recognized over the service
period with the highest revenue months being July through September and December and January. The
Companys operating expenses do not follow the seasonality of the revenues. This is primarily due
to fixed year-round personnel costs and seasonal marketing costs.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(96.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(96.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue |
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
27,386 |
|
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(169.7 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(40.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
11,901 |
|
|
|
10,194 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
27,496 |
|
|
|
24,301 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
5,784 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
12,947 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
18,986 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income before income taxes |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
8,551 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
(3,249 |
) |
|
|
(2,727 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income |
|
$ |
1,551 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,302 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin, excluding net interest
income |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income. Investment income decreased as a result of decreases in interest
rates on cash held in 2009 compared to 2008.
Tuition payment processing and campus commerce revenue. Tuition payment processing and
campus commerce revenue increased in 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 as a result of an
increase in the number of managed tuition payment plans as well as an increase in campus commerce
transactions processed.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 as a result of incurring additional costs associated
with salaries and benefits to support the increase in the number of managed tuition payment plans
and campus commerce transactions. In addition, the Company continues to invest in new products and
services to meet customer needs and expand product and service offerings. These investments
increased operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008.
Before tax operating margin, excluding net interest income. The Company evaluates the
results of this segment based on operating margins excluding net interest income. Net interest
income earned by the Company during any given period is subject to the underlying interest rate earned on cash and is a
factor beyond the Companys control which can affect the period-to-period comparability of results
of operations.
50
ENROLLMENT SERVICES OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Enrollment Services segment offers products and services that are focused on helping (i)
students plan and prepare for life after high school (content management and publishing and editing
services) and (ii) colleges recruit and retain students (lead generation and recruitment services).
Lead generation products and services include vendor lead management services and admissions lead
generation. Publishing and editing services include test preparation study guides and essay and
resume editing services. Content management products and services include online courses and
related services. Recruitment services include pay per click marketing management, email marketing,
list marketing services, and admissions consulting.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Software services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
29,024 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
57,795 |
|
|
|
53,327 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
11,958 |
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
Restructure expense severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Cost to provide enrollment services |
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
3,337 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
5,289 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
(67.8 |
) |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
(2,373 |
) |
|
|
(69.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
27,504 |
|
|
|
25,222 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
55,233 |
|
|
|
52,052 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income before income
taxes |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
120.2 |
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
145.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income |
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin -
excluding net interest income and
restructure expense |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Enrollment services revenue, cost to provide enrollment services, and gross profit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publishing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
editing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and recruitment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
generation (a) |
|
|
services (b) |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
services (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
$ |
21,709 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
23,781 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment
services |
|
|
17,071 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
4,638 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
5,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit % |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publishing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
editing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and recruitment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
generation (a) |
|
|
services (b) |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
services (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
$ |
16,972 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
19,696 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment
services |
|
|
13,613 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
14,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
3,358 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit % |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publishing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
editing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and recruitment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
generation (a) |
|
|
services (b) |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
services (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
$ |
42,779 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
47,731 |
|
|
|
9,787 |
|
|
|
57,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment
services |
|
|
33,650 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
35,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
9,129 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
11,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit % |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publishing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
editing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and recruitment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
generation (a) |
|
|
services (b) |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
services (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrollment services revenue |
|
$ |
34,406 |
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
40,679 |
|
|
|
12,611 |
|
|
|
53,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost to provide enrollment
services |
|
|
27,474 |
|
|
|
2,684 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
6,931 |
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit % |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Lead generation revenue increased $4.7 million (27.9%) and $8.4 million (24.3%) for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, respectively, as a
result of an increase in lead generation services volume. The gross profit for lead
generation services increased due to the Companys focus on eliminating lower margin sales and
creating cost efficiencies. |
|
(b) |
|
Publishing and editing services revenue decreased $0.7 million (23.9%) and $1.3 million
(21.0%) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008,
respectively, due to competition related to online delivery of similar products, as well as a
general downturn in economic conditions. The gross profit for publishing and editing services
decreased as a result of a shift in the mix of products sold. |
|
(c) |
|
Content management and recruitment services revenue decreased $1.4 million (22.0%) and $2.8
million (22.3%) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods
in 2008, respectively. These decreases were the result of decreases of $1.2 million and $2.0
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008,
respectively, associated with the Companys pay per click marketing management, email
marketing, and admissions consulting services as a result of a change in the delivery of such products and a decrease of $0.8 million associated with the Companys list
marketing services for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008
as a result of legislative developments in the student loan industry. |
52
Operating expenses. Excluding restructure charges and the cost to provide enrollment
services, operating expenses decreased $1.1 million (10.2%) and $2.3 million (10.5%), respectively,
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 as a result of continued focus on cost efficiencies.
SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Software and Technical Services operating segment develops student loan servicing software,
which is used internally by the Company and also licensed to third-party student loan holders and
servicers. This segment also provides information technology products and services, with core
areas of business in educational loan software solutions, business intelligence, technical
consulting services, and Enterprise Content Management solutions.
Many of the Companys external customers receiving services in this segment have been negatively
impacted as a result of the passage of the College Cost Reduction Act and the recent disruption in
the capital markets. This impact could decrease the demand for products and services and affect
this segments future revenue and profit margins.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Software services revenue |
|
$ |
5,194 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
$ |
10,024 |
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
)% |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
156.8 |
|
|
|
7,020 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
|
2,677 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
17,044 |
|
|
|
14,944 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
5,715 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
|
|
9,870 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Restructure expense severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
(5,375.0 |
) |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
123.4 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
7,739 |
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
14,247 |
|
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income before
income taxes |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
103.8 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
149.5 |
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,733 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin -
excluding restructure expense |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software services revenue. Software services revenue decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 as
the result of a reduction in the number of projects for existing external customers and the loss of external
customers due to the legislative developments in the student loan industry throughout 2008 and
2009. During the second quarter of 2009, this decrease was offset by certain fees from existing
external customers on non-routine projects.
Intersegment revenue. Intersegment revenue increased in 2009 compared to the same periods
in 2008 as a result of an increase in the number of projects for internal customers.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased in 2009 compared to the same periods in
2008 as a result of costs associated with salaries and benefits to support the increase in
intersegment revenue.
53
ASSET GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Asset Generation and Management Operating Segment includes the origination, acquisition,
management, and ownership of the Companys student loan assets, which has historically been the
Companys largest product and service offering. The Company historically generated a substantial
portion of its earnings from the spread, referred to as the Companys student loan spread, between
the yield it receives on its student loan portfolio and the costs associated with originating,
acquiring, and financing its portfolio. The Company generates student loan assets through direct
origination or through acquisitions. The student loan assets are held in a series of education
lending subsidiaries designed specifically for this purpose.
In addition to the student loan portfolio, all costs and activity associated with the generation of
assets, funding of those assets, and maintenance of the debt transactions are included in this
segment. This includes derivative activity and the related derivative market value and foreign
currency adjustments. The Company is also able to leverage its capital market expertise by
providing investment advisory services and other related services to third parties through a
licensed broker-dealer subsidiary. Revenues and expenses for those functions are also included in
the Asset Generation and Management segment.
Student Loan Portfolio
The tables below outline the components of the Companys student loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated |
|
|
Originated |
|
|
Originated on or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to |
|
|
between 10/1/07 |
|
|
after 6/4/08 - |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10/1/07 |
|
|
and 6/3/08 (a) |
|
|
held for sale (b) |
|
Federally insured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stafford |
|
$ |
8,383,144 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
$ |
6,340,889 |
|
|
|
467,338 |
|
|
|
1,574,917 |
|
PLUS/SLS |
|
|
589,223 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
384,180 |
|
|
|
48,920 |
|
|
|
156,123 |
|
Consolidation |
|
|
16,126,450 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
15,969,110 |
|
|
|
157,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federally insured |
|
|
25,098,817 |
|
|
|
97.9 |
% |
|
$ |
22,694,179 |
|
|
|
673,598 |
|
|
|
1,731,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.4 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-federally insured |
|
|
200,722 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total student loans receivable (gross) |
|
|
25,299,539 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premiums and deferred
origination costs held for investment |
|
|
371,072 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premiums and deferred
origination costs held for sale |
|
|
18,250 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federally insured |
|
|
(28,093 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-federally insured |
|
|
(21,907 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total student loans receivable (net) |
|
$ |
25,638,861 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated |
|
|
Originated |
|
|
Originated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to |
|
|
between 10/1/07 |
|
|
on or after |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10/1/07 |
|
|
and 6/3/08 (a) |
|
|
6/4/08 (b) |
|
Federally insured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stafford |
|
$ |
7,602,568 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
$ |
6,641,817 |
|
|
|
390,658 |
|
|
|
570,093 |
|
PLUS/SLS |
|
|
527,670 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
412,142 |
|
|
|
48,346 |
|
|
|
67,182 |
|
Consolidation |
|
|
16,657,703 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
% |
|
|
16,614,950 |
|
|
|
42,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federally insured |
|
|
24,787,941 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
% |
|
$ |
23,668,909 |
|
|
|
481,757 |
|
|
|
637,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-federally insured |
|
|
273,108 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total student loans receivable (gross) |
|
|
25,061,049 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premiums and deferred
origination costs |
|
|
402,881 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federally insured |
|
|
(25,577 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-federally insured |
|
|
(25,345 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total student loans receivable (net) |
|
$ |
25,413,008 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Federally insured student loans originated on or after October 1, 2007 earn a reduced annual
yield as a result of the enactment of the College Cost Reduction Act in September 2007. |
|
(b) |
|
Federally insured student loans originated by the Company on or after June 4, 2008 are
eligible to be participated and sold to the Department under the Departments Participation
and Purchase Programs. As of June 30, 2009, these loans are classified as held for sale as
they are expected to be sold to the Department under the Departments Purchase Program. |
Origination and Acquisition
The Company has historically originated and acquired loans through various methods and channels
including: (i) direct-to-consumer channel (in which the Company originates student loans directly
with student and parent borrowers), (ii) campus based origination channels, and (iii) spot
purchases.
The Company will originate or acquire loans through its campus based channel either directly under
one of its brand names or through other originating lenders. In addition to its brands, the Company
acquires student loans from lenders to whom the Company provides marketing and/or origination
services established through various contracts. Branding partners are lenders for which the Company
acts as a marketing agent in specified geographic areas. A forward flow lender is one for whom the
Company provides origination services but provides no marketing services or whom simply agrees to
sell loans to the Company under forward sale commitments.
55
The following table sets forth the activity of loans originated or acquired through each of the
Companys channels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
25,274,173 |
|
|
|
26,347,354 |
|
|
|
25,061,049 |
|
|
|
26,329,213 |
|
Direct channel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation loan originations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,029 |
|
Less consolidation of existing portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net consolidation loan originations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,582 |
|
Stafford/PLUS loan originations |
|
|
256,844 |
|
|
|
114,228 |
|
|
|
798,436 |
|
|
|
535,329 |
|
Branding partner channel |
|
|
183,258 |
|
|
|
127,929 |
|
|
|
595,571 |
|
|
|
601,307 |
|
Forward flow channel |
|
|
51,044 |
|
|
|
84,216 |
|
|
|
51,044 |
|
|
|
403,060 |
|
Other channels |
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,370 |
|
|
|
55,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total channel acquisitions |
|
|
497,711 |
|
|
|
328,669 |
|
|
|
1,465,421 |
|
|
|
1,636,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments, claims, capitalized interest, participations, and other |
|
|
(385,041 |
) |
|
|
(585,443 |
) |
|
|
(1,013,968 |
) |
|
|
(885,243 |
) |
Consolidation loans lost to external parties |
|
|
(67,071 |
) |
|
|
(46,849 |
) |
|
|
(172,589 |
) |
|
|
(176,267 |
) |
Loans sold |
|
|
(20,233 |
) |
|
|
(431,605 |
) |
|
|
(40,374 |
) |
|
|
(1,291,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
25,299,539 |
|
|
|
25,612,126 |
|
|
|
25,299,539 |
|
|
|
25,612,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has significant financing needs that it meets through the capital markets. Since August
2007, the capital markets have experienced unprecedented disruptions, which have had an adverse
impact on the Companys earnings and financial condition. Since the Company could not determine nor
control the length of time or extent to which the capital markets would remain disrupted, it
reduced its direct and indirect costs related to its asset generation activities and was more
selective in pursuing origination activity in the direct to consumer channel. Accordingly,
beginning in January 2008, the Company suspended Consolidation and private student loan
originations and exercised contractual rights to discontinue, suspend, or defer the acquisition of
student loans in connection with substantially all of its branding and forward flow relationships.
Prior to and in conjunction with exercising this right, during the first quarter of 2008, the
Company accelerated the purchase of loans from certain branding partner and forward flow lenders of
approximately $511 million.
Historically, the Company funded new loan originations using loan warehouse facilities and
asset-backed securitizations. Student loan warehousing has historically allowed the Company to buy
and manage student loans prior to transferring them into more permanent financing arrangements. In
July 2008, the Company did not renew its liquidity provisions on its FFELP warehouse facility.
Accordingly, the facility became a term facility and no new loan originations could be funded with
this facility. In August 2008, the Company began funding FFELP Stafford and PLUS student loan
originations for the 2008-2009 academic year pursuant to the Departments Participation Program (as
discussed below).
In August 2008, the Department implemented the Purchase and Participation Programs pursuant to the
ECASLA. Under the Departments Purchase Program, the Department will purchase loans at a price
equal to the sum of (i) par value, (ii) accrued interest, (iii) the one percent origination fee
paid to the Department, and (iv) a fixed amount of $75 per loan. Under the Participation Program,
the Department provides interim short term liquidity to FFELP lenders by purchasing participation
interests in pools of FFELP loans. FFELP lenders are charged a rate of commercial paper plus 50
basis points on the principal amount of participation interests outstanding. Loans funded under the
Participation Program must be either refinanced by the lender or sold to the Department pursuant to
the Purchase Program prior to its expiration on September 30, 2009. To be eligible for purchase or
participation under the Departments programs, loans were originally limited to FFELP Stafford or
PLUS loans made for the academic year 2008-2009, first disbursed between May 1, 2008 and July 1,
2009, with eligible borrower benefits.
On October 7, 2008, legislation was enacted to extend the Departments authority to address FFELP
student loans made for the 2009-2010 academic year and allowing for the extension of the
Participation Program and Purchase Program from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010. The
Department indicated that loans for the 2008-2009 academic year which are funded under the
Departments Participation Program will need to be refinanced or sold to the Department prior to
September 30, 2009. On November 8, 2008, the Department announced the replication of the terms of
the Participation and Purchase Program, in accordance with the October 7, 2008 legislation, which
will include FFELP student loans made for the 2009-2010 academic year.
The Company plans to continue to use the Participation Program and a participation agreement with
Union Bank to fund loans through the 2009-2010 academic year. These programs
are allowing the Company to continue originating new federal student loans to all students
regardless of the school they attend.
56
Activity in the Allowance for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents the periodic expense of maintaining an allowance
sufficient to absorb losses, net of recoveries, inherent in the portfolio of student loans. An
analysis of the Companys allowance for loan losses is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
48,497 |
|
|
|
46,137 |
|
|
|
50,922 |
|
|
|
45,592 |
|
Provision for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federally insured loans |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Non-federally insured loans |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federally insured loans |
|
|
(4,216 |
) |
|
|
(3,878 |
) |
|
|
(7,463 |
) |
|
|
(7,200 |
) |
Non-federally insured loans |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(5,197 |
) |
|
|
(4,228 |
) |
|
|
(9,102 |
) |
|
|
(7,933 |
) |
Sale of federally insured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
Sale of non-federally insured loans |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
47,909 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
47,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federally insured loans |
|
$ |
28,093 |
|
|
|
24,084 |
|
|
|
28,093 |
|
|
|
24,084 |
|
Non-federally insured loans |
|
|
21,907 |
|
|
|
23,825 |
|
|
|
21,907 |
|
|
|
23,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
47,909 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
47,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs as a percentage of average student loans |
|
|
0.083 |
% |
|
|
0.066 |
% |
|
|
0.072 |
% |
|
|
0.060 |
% |
Total allowance as a percentage of average student loans |
|
|
0.199 |
% |
|
|
0.186 |
% |
|
|
0.198 |
% |
|
|
0.182 |
% |
Total
allowance as a percentage of the ending balance of student loans (excluding loans held-for-sale) |
|
|
0.212 |
% |
|
|
0.187 |
% |
|
|
0.198 |
% |
|
|
0.187 |
% |
Allowance for non-federally insured loans as a percentage such loans |
|
|
10.914 |
% |
|
|
8.510 |
% |
|
|
10.914 |
% |
|
|
8.510 |
% |
Average student loans |
|
$ |
25,123,382 |
|
|
|
25,767,123 |
|
|
|
25,194,642 |
|
|
|
26,313,226 |
|
Ending balance of student loans (excluding loans held-for-sale) |
|
|
23,568,499 |
|
|
|
25,612,126 |
|
|
|
25,299,539 |
|
|
|
25,612,126 |
|
Ending balance of non-federally insured loans |
|
|
200,722 |
|
|
|
279,953 |
|
|
|
200,722 |
|
|
|
279,953 |
|
Delinquencies have the potential to adversely impact the Companys earnings through increased
servicing and collection costs and account charge-offs. The table below shows the Companys
student loan delinquency amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
Federally Insured Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1) |
|
$ |
7,964,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,374,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in forebearance(2) |
|
|
2,381,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,484,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in repayment status: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans current |
|
|
12,949,200 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
% |
|
|
13,169,101 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
% |
Loans delinquent 31-60 days(3) |
|
|
551,179 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
536,112 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Loans delinquent 61-90 days(3) |
|
|
296,130 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
240,549 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Loans delinquent 91 days or greater(4) |
|
|
956,702 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
983,099 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans in repayment |
|
|
14,753,211 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
14,928,861 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federally insured loans |
|
$ |
25,098,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,787,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Federally Insured Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1) |
|
$ |
57,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in forebearance(2) |
|
|
5,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in repayment status: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans current |
|
|
130,015 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
|
169,865 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
% |
Loans delinquent 31-60 days(3) |
|
|
2,852 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Loans delinquent 61-90 days(3) |
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Loans delinquent 91 days or greater(4) |
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans in repayment |
|
|
138,242 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
179,331 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-federally insured loans |
|
$ |
200,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans for borrowers who still may be attending school or engaging in other permitted
educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans, e.g., residency
periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation for law students. |
|
(2) |
|
Loans for borrowers who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other
factors, according to a schedule approved by the servicer consistent with the established loan
program servicing procedures and policies. |
|
(3) |
|
The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually
past due and relate to repayment loans, that is, receivables not charged off, and not in
school, grace, deferment, or forbearance. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans delinquent 91 days or greater include loans in claim status, which are loans that have
gone into default and have been submitted to the guaranty agency for FFELP loans, or, if
applicable, the insurer for non-federally insured loans, to process the claim for payment. |
57
Student Loan Spread Analysis
The following table analyzes the student loan spread on the Companys portfolio of student loans
and represents the spread on assets earned in conjunction with the liabilities and derivative
instruments used to fund the assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Variable student loan yield |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
Consolidation rebate fees |
|
|
(0.70 |
) |
|
|
(0.74 |
) |
|
|
(0.71 |
) |
|
|
(0.74 |
) |
Premium and deferred origination costs amortization |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable student loan net yield |
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
Student loan cost of funds interest expense |
|
|
(1.52 |
) |
|
|
(3.31 |
) |
|
|
(1.84 |
) |
|
|
(3.94 |
) |
Student loan cost of funds derivative settlements |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable student loan spread |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
Variable rate floor income,
net of settlements on derivatives (a) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
Fixed rate floor income,
net of settlements on derivatives |
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core student loan spread |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of student loans |
|
$ |
25,123,382 |
|
|
|
25,767,123 |
|
|
|
25,194,642 |
|
|
|
26,313,226 |
|
Average balance of debt outstanding |
|
|
25,683,991 |
|
|
|
26,767,459 |
|
|
|
25,723,916 |
|
|
|
27,297,445 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As a result of the ongoing volatility of interest rates, effective October 1, 2008, the
Company changed its calculation of variable rate floor income to better reflect the economic
benefit received by the Company. The economic benefit received by the Company related to
variable rate floor income was $6.0 million and $19.3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $7.5 million and $25.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Variable rate floor income calculated on a statutory
maximum basis was $13.0 million and $21.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $23.8 million and $40.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Beginning October 1, 2008, and for presentation of prior periods,
the economic benefit received by the Company has been used to determine core student loan
spread. For the student loan spread analysis shown above, variable-rate floor income for prior
periods was changed to reflect the economic benefit to conform to the current period
presentation. |
The Companys core student loan spread during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to 2008 was impacted by the following items:
Increases
|
|
|
The amortization of loan premiums and deferred origination costs, which is a reduction
to core student loan spread, decreased as a result of reduced costs to acquire or
originate loans and a decrease in the yield earned on student loans. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has a portfolio of student loans that are earning interest at a fixed
borrower rate which exceeds the statutorily defined variable lender rate creating fixed
rate floor income which is included in its core student loan spread. Due to lower interest
rates in the three and six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in
2008, the Company received additional fixed rate floor income on a portion of its student
loan portfolio. See Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk -
Interest Rate Risk for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has used derivative instruments to hedge the repricing risk due to the
timing of the interest rate resets on its assets and liabilities. The Company has entered
into basis swaps in which the Company receives three-month LIBOR and pays one-month LIBOR
plus or minus a spread as defined in the agreements (1/3 Basis Swaps). During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Company received $6.7 million and $17.4 million, respectively, of
settlements on its 1/3 Basis Swaps. During the first quarter of 2008, the
Company received $0.9 million of settlements on its 1/3 Basis Swaps. No 1/3 Basis Swaps were outstanding during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. |
58
Decreases
|
|
|
The passage of the College Cost Reduction Act has reduced the yield on all FFELP loans
originated after October 1, 2007. As of June 30, 2009, 9.6% of the Companys federally
insured student loan portfolio was originated after October 1, 2007 as compared to 2.2% as
of June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Historically, the movement of the various interest rate indices received on the
Companys student loan assets and paid on the debt to fund such loans was highly
correlated. The short term movement of the indices was dislocated beginning in August
2007. Due to the unintended consequences of government intervention in the commercial
paper markets and limited issuances of qualifying financial commercial paper, the
relationship between the three-month financial CP and LIBOR rates has continued to widen.
To address this issue, the Department announced that for purposes of calculating the FFELP
loan index from October 27, 2008 to December 31, 2008, the Federal Reserves Commercial
Paper Funding Facility rate was used for those days in which no three-month financial
commercial paper rate was available. This action partially mitigated the volatility
between CP and LIBOR for the three-month period ended on December 31, 2008. However, the
Department of Education did not make a similar adjustment for the first and second
quarters of 2009, which negatively impacted the Companys net interest income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
The spread to LIBOR on asset-backed securities transactions has increased significantly
since August 2007. The Company issued $4.4 billion of notes in asset-backed securities
transactions in 2008 ($1.2 billion in March 2008, $1.9 billion in April 2008, and $1.3
billion in May 2008) and an additional $0.3 billion in March 2009. Prior to completing
these asset-backed securities transactions, these loans were funded in the Companys FFELP
warehouse facility in which the cost of funds were lower than the asset-backed securities
transactions. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has used derivative instruments to hedge the repricing risk due to the
timing of the interest rate resets on its assets and liabilities. The Company has entered
into basis swaps in which the Company receives three-month LIBOR set discretely in advance
and pays a daily weighted average three-month LIBOR less a spread as defined in the
individual agreements (the Average/Discrete Basis Swaps).
The Company received less settlements on its Average/Discrete Basis
Swaps in the first and second quarters of 2009 compared to the same
periods in 2008, due to the significant drop in interest rates which
triggered larger settlements during the first and second
quarters of 2008. |
59
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses |
|
$ |
49,895 |
|
|
|
53,891 |
|
|
|
(3,996 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
76,388 |
|
|
|
53,234 |
|
|
|
23,154 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and guaranty servicing revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
8,892 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Gain (loss) on sale of loans |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(508.3 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(47,426 |
) |
|
|
47,024 |
|
|
|
(99.2 |
) |
Derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Derivative settlements, net |
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
(2,103 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
55,165 |
|
|
|
(21,272 |
) |
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
13,580 |
|
|
|
16,694 |
|
|
|
(3,114 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
42,383 |
|
|
|
18,075 |
|
|
|
24,308 |
|
|
|
134.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
(668 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
Restructure expense severance and contract
termination costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
(1,844 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Impairment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,351 |
|
|
|
(9,351 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
|
10,439 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
20,732 |
|
|
|
18,952 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
38,608 |
|
|
|
39,554 |
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
28,342 |
|
|
|
25,949 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
52,952 |
|
|
|
65,366 |
|
|
|
(12,414 |
) |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income before income taxes |
|
|
35,133 |
|
|
|
44,636 |
|
|
|
(9,503 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
65,819 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
59,876 |
|
|
|
1,007.5 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(13,351 |
) |
|
|
(13,837 |
) |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(25,012 |
) |
|
|
(1,842 |
) |
|
|
(23,170 |
) |
|
|
1,257.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base net income |
|
$ |
21,782 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
|
|
(9,017 |
) |
|
|
(29.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
40,807 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
36,706 |
|
|
|
895.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin |
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax Operating Margin -
excluding restructure expense,
impairment expense, and loss on sale
of loans during the first quarter of 2008 |
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
54.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loan interest |
|
$ |
214,986 |
|
|
|
345,321 |
|
|
|
(130,335 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
)% |
Consolidation rebate fees |
|
|
(43,827 |
) |
|
|
(47,721 |
) |
|
|
3,894 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Amortization of loan premiums and
deferred origination costs |
|
|
(16,789 |
) |
|
|
(22,841 |
) |
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan interest |
|
|
154,370 |
|
|
|
274,759 |
|
|
|
(120,389 |
) |
|
|
(43.8 |
) |
Investment interest |
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
(5,671 |
) |
|
|
(75.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
156,233 |
|
|
|
282,293 |
|
|
|
(126,060 |
) |
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on bonds and notes payable |
|
|
97,916 |
|
|
|
221,856 |
|
|
|
(123,940 |
) |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
Intercompany interest |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses |
|
$ |
49,895 |
|
|
|
53,891 |
|
|
|
(3,996 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan interest income decreased $130.3 million as a result of a decrease in the average
student loan portfolio of $0.6 billion (2.5%) and a decrease in the yield earned on student
loans due to a decrease in interest rates for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Consolidation rebate fees decreased due to the $1.8 billion (10.0%) decrease in the
average consolidation portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
The amortization of loan premiums and deferred origination costs decreased as a result
of reduced costs to acquire or originate loans and a decrease in the yield earned on
student loans. |
60
|
|
|
Investment income decreased as a result of lower interest rates in the second quarter of
2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased as a result of a decrease in interest rates on the Companys
variable rate debt which lowered the Companys cost of funds (excluding net derivative
settlements) to 1.52% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 3.31% for the
same period a year ago. In addition, average debt decreased by $1.1 billion (4.0%) for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses increased for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to increases in delinquencies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loan interest |
|
$ |
447,572 |
|
|
|
731,747 |
|
|
|
(284,175 |
) |
|
|
(38.8 |
)% |
Consolidation rebate fees |
|
|
(88,304 |
) |
|
|
(97,575 |
) |
|
|
9,271 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Amortization of loan premiums and
deferred origination costs |
|
|
(35,439 |
) |
|
|
(48,245 |
) |
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan interest |
|
|
323,829 |
|
|
|
585,927 |
|
|
|
(262,098 |
) |
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
Investment interest |
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
16,724 |
|
|
|
(11,733 |
) |
|
|
(70.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
328,820 |
|
|
|
602,651 |
|
|
|
(273,831 |
) |
|
|
(45.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on bonds and notes payable |
|
|
235,949 |
|
|
|
537,777 |
|
|
|
(301,828 |
) |
|
|
(56.1 |
) |
Intercompany interest |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after
provision
for loan losses |
|
$ |
76,388 |
|
|
|
53,234 |
|
|
|
23,154 |
|
|
|
(43.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan interest income decreased $284.2 million as a result of a decrease in the average
student loan portfolio of $0.5 billion (2.0%) and a decrease in the yield earned on student
loans due to a decrease in interest rates for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Consolidation rebate fees decreased due to the $2.3 billion (12.2%) decrease in the
average consolidation portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
The amortization of loan premiums and deferred origination costs decreased as a result
of reduced costs to acquire or originate loans and a decrease in the yield earned on
student loans. |
|
|
|
|
Investment income decreased as a result of lower interest rates for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased as a result of a decrease in interest rates on the Companys
variable rate debt which lowered the Companys cost of funds (excluding net derivative
settlements) to 1.84% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 3.94% for the same
period a year ago. In addition, average debt decreased by $1.6 billion (5.8%) for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses increased for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008 primarily due to increases in delinquencies. |
Loss on sale of loans . The Company sold student loan portfolios to third parties in 2008
and 2009 in order to reduce the amount of student loans remaining under the Companys multi-year
committed financing facility for FFELP loans, which reduced the Companys exposure related to
certain equity support provisions included in this facility. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, the Company sold $20.0 million (par value) and $40.4 million (par value),
respectively, of federally insured student loans, resulting in the recognition of losses of $0.2
million and $0.4 million, respectively. On March 31, 2008, the Company sold $857.8 million (par
value) of federally insured student loans resulting in the recognition of a loss of $30.4 million.
In addition, on April 8, 2008, the Company sold $428.6 million (par value) of federally insured
student loans. The portfolio of student loans sold on April 8, 2008 was presented as held for
sale on the March 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet and was valued at the lower of cost or fair
value. The Company recognized a loss of $17.1 million during the three month period ended March
31, 2008 as a result of marking these loans to fair value.
Derivative settlements, net. The Company maintains an overall risk management strategy that
incorporates the use of derivative instruments to reduce the economic effect of interest rate
volatility. Management has structured all of the Companys derivative transactions with the intent
that each is economically effective; however, the Companys derivative instruments do not qualify
for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. Derivative settlements for each applicable period should
be evaluated with the Companys net interest income.
61
Operating expenses. During the second quarter of 2009, the Asset Generation and Management
operating segment paid $1.8 million in fees to the Student Loan and Guaranty Servicing operating
segment to transfer loans between various financings as the Company was executing certain liquidity
strategies. In addition, the Company recognized $0.8 million in expenses associated with the
Companys obligation to repurchase loans related to the participation of non-federally insured
loans to third parties. Excluding these expenses and the
restructure and impairment charges, operating expenses decreased $0.3 million (1.0%) and
$3.8 million (7.0%) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to same periods in
2008. Operating expenses decreased as a result of continued focus by the Company on
managing costs and gaining efficiencies and continued benefits from prior restructuring activities.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Companys fee-based businesses are not capital intensive businesses and all of these businesses
produce positive operating cash flows. As such, a minimal amount of debt and equity capital is
allocated to these segments. Therefore, the majority of the Liquidity and Capital Resources
discussion is concentrated on the Companys Asset Generation and Management operating segment. The
Company has historically utilized operating cash flow, secured financing transactions (which
include warehouse facilities and asset-backed securitizations), operating lines of credit, and
other borrowing arrangements to fund its Asset Generation and Management operations and student
loan acquisitions. In addition, the Company uses operating cash flow, borrowings on its unsecured
line of credit, and unsecured debt offerings to fund corporate activities, business acquisitions,
and repurchases of common stock. The Company has also used its common stock to partially fund
certain business acquisitions. The Company has a universal shelf registration statement with the
SEC which allows the Company to sell up to $825.0 million of securities that may consist of common
stock, preferred stock, unsecured debt securities, warrants, stock purchase contracts, and stock
purchase units. The terms of any securities are established at the time of the offering.
The Company may issue equity and debt securities in the future in order to improve capital,
increase liquidity, refinance upcoming maturities, or provide for general corporate purposes.
Moreover, the Company may from time-to-time repurchase certain
amounts of its outstanding secured and unsecured debt
securities, including debt securities which the Company may issue in the future, for cash and/or
through exchanges for other securities. Such repurchases or exchanges may be made in open market
transactions, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise. Any such repurchases or exchanges
will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Companys liquidity requirements, contractual
restrictions, compliance with securities laws, and other factors. The amounts involved in any such
transactions may be material.
62
The following table summarizes the Companys bonds and notes outstanding as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
range |
|
|
Final maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate bonds and notes (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and notes based on indices |
|
$ |
20,063,227 |
|
|
|
0.61% 6.90% |
|
|
|
09/25/13 6/25/41 |
|
Bonds and notes based on auction or remarketing |
|
|
2,606,740 |
|
|
|
0.46% 2.96% |
|
|
|
11/01/09 07/01/43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable-rate bonds and notes |
|
|
22,669,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper FFELP facility (b) |
|
|
420,936 |
|
|
|
0.32% 1.13% |
|
|
|
05/09/10 |
|
Fixed-rate bonds and notes (a) |
|
|
188,797 |
|
|
|
5.40% 6.50% |
|
|
|
11/01/09 05/01/29 |
|
Unsecured fixed rate debt |
|
|
402,864 |
|
|
|
5.125% and 7.40% |
|
|
|
06/01/10 and 09/15/61 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
691,500 |
|
|
|
0.79% 0.85% |
|
|
|
05/08/12 |
|
Department of Education Participation |
|
|
1,741,481 |
|
|
|
1.24% |
|
|
|
09/30/09 |
|
Department of Education Conduit |
|
|
1,023,600 |
|
|
|
0.52% |
|
|
|
05/08/14 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
30,428 |
|
|
|
0.32% 5.10% |
|
|
|
01/10/10 11/01/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Issued in asset-backed securitizations |
|
(b) |
|
Loan warehouse facilities |
Secured Financing Transactions
The Company has historically relied upon secured financing vehicles as its most significant source
of funding for student loans. The net cash flow the Company receives from the securitized student
loans generally represents the excess amounts, if any, generated by the underlying student loans
over the amounts required to be paid to the bondholders, after deducting servicing fees and any
other expenses relating to the securitizations. The Companys rights to cash flow from securitized
student loans are subordinate to bondholder interests and may fail to generate any cash flow beyond
what is due to bondholders. The Companys secured financing vehicles are loan warehouse
facilities, asset-backed securitizations, and the governments Participation and Conduit Programs
(as described below).
Historically, the Company funded new loan originations using loan warehouse facilities and
asset-backed securitizations. Student loan warehousing has historically allowed the Company to buy
and manage student loans prior to transferring them into more permanent financing arrangements. In
July 2008, the Company did not renew its liquidity provisions on its FFELP warehouse facility.
Accordingly, the facility became a term facility and no new loan originations could be funded with
this facility. In August 2008, the Company began funding FFELP Stafford and PLUS student loan
originations for the 2008-2009 academic year pursuant to the Departments Loan Participation
Program and a participation agreement with Union Bank.
Loan warehouse facilities
Student loan warehousing has historically allowed the Company to buy and manage student loans prior
to transferring them into more permanent financing arrangements. To support its funding needs on a
short-term basis, the Company historically relied upon a multi-year committed facility for FFELP
loans as further discussed below.
FFELP Warehouse Facility
The Companys multi-year committed facility for FFELP loans terminates in May 2010 and was
supported by 364-day liquidity which was up for renewal on May 9, 2008. The Company obtained an
extension on this renewal until July 31, 2008. On July 31, 2008, the Company did not renew the
liquidity provisions of this facility. Accordingly, as of July 31, 2008, the facility became a
term facility with a final maturity date of May 9, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement,
since liquidity was not renewed, the Companys cost of financing under this facility increased 10
basis points. The agreement also includes provisions which allow the banks to charge a rate equal
to LIBOR plus 128.5 basis points if they choose to finance their portion of the facility with
sources of funds other than their commercial paper conduit.
The terms and conditions of the Companys warehouse facility for FFELP loans provides for formula
based advance rates based on market conditions. While the Company does not believe that the loan
valuation formula is reflective of the actual fair value of its loans, it is subject to compliance
with such mark-to-formula provisions of the warehouse facility agreement. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company had $1.6 billion of student loans in the facility, $1.4 billion borrowed under the
facility, and $280.6 million posted as equity funding support for this facility.
63
On March 26, 2009, the Company completed a privately placed asset-backed securitization of $294.6
million. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the sale of these notes
and additional funds of approximately $10 million to purchase approximately $305 million of
principal and interest on student loans, which were previously financed under the Companys FFELP
warehouse facility.
In June 2009, the Company accessed the Departments Conduit Program (as further discussed below) to
fund approximately $790 million of principal and interest on student loans, which were previously
financed under the Companys FFELP warehouse facility. The Company is
permitted to fund 97% of the principal and interest expected to be capitalized. Accordingly, the
Company borrowed approximately $763 million under the Conduit Program for purposes of refinancing
loans in the FFELP warehouse facility. Excess amounts needed to fund the remaining 3% of the
student loan balances were contributed by the Company.
Removing student loans from the FFELP warehouse facility as a result of the privately placed
asset-backed securitization and Conduit Program allowed the Company to withdraw cash posted as
equity funding support for the FFELP facility. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $403.7 million
of student loans in the facility, $420.9 million borrowed under the facility, and $62.8 million
posted as equity funding support.
On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into a new FFELP warehouse facility (the
2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility). The 2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility has a maximum financing amount
of $500.0 million, with a revolving financing structure supported by 364-day liquidity provisions,
which expire on August 2, 2010. The final maturity date of the facility is August 3, 2012. In the
event the Company is unable to renew the liquidity provisions by August 2, 2010, the facility
would become a term facility at a stepped-up cost, with no additional student loans being eligible
for financing, and the Company would be required to refinance the existing loans in the facility by
August 3, 2012. The Company plans to utilize the new facility to refinance the remaining student
loans in the Companys prior FFELP warehouse facility that expires in May 2010. Refinancing these
loans will allow the Company to withdraw all remaining equity funding support from the prior FFELP warehouse facility.
The 2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility provides for formula based advance rates depending on FFELP loan
type. The advance rates for collateral may increase or decrease based on market conditions. The
all-in pricing for the facility during the first year (including up-front fees and other costs to
structure the facility) is expected to be just below the conduits commercial paper rate plus 1%.
The facility contains covenants, including financial covenants relating to levels of the Companys consolidated net
worth, ratio of adjusted EBITDA to corporate debt interest, and
unencumbered cash. Any violation of these covenants could result in a
requirement for the immediate repayment of any
outstanding borrowings under the facility. Unlike the Companys prior FFELP warehouse facility, the
new facility does not require the Company to refinance or remove a percentage
of the pledged student loan collateral on an annual basis.
Private Loan Warehouse Facility
On February 25, 2009, the Company paid $91.5 million on the debt of its private loan warehouse
facility with operating cash and terminated the facility. Beginning in January 2008, the Company
suspended private student loan originations.
Asset-backed securitizations
Of the $27.2 billion of debt outstanding as of June 30, 2009, $22.9 billion was issued under term
asset-backed securitizations. Depending on market conditions, the Company anticipates continuing to
access the asset-backed securities market. As a result of the disruptions in the credit markets,
the Company may not be able to issue asset-backed financings at rates historically achieved by the
Company, at levels equal to or less than other financing agreements, or at levels otherwise
considered beneficial to the Company. Accordingly, the Companys operational and financial results
may be negatively impacted. Securities issued in the securitization transactions are generally
priced based upon a spread to LIBOR or set under an auction or remarketing procedure.
64
LIBOR based notes
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $20.1 billion of notes issued under asset-backed
securitizations that primarily reprice at a fixed spread to three month LIBOR and are structured to
substantially match the maturity of the funded assets. These notes fund FFELP student loans that
are predominantly set based on a spread to three month commercial paper. The three month LIBOR and
three month commercial paper indexes have historically been highly correlated. Based on cash flows
developed to reflect managements current estimate of, among other factors,
prepayments, defaults, deferment, forbearance, and interest rates, the Company currently expects
future undiscounted cash flows from these transactions will be in
excess of $1.4 billion. These
cash flows consist of net spread and servicing and administrative revenue in excess of estimated
cost. However, due to the unintended consequences of government intervention in the commercial
paper markets and limited issuances of qualifying financial commercial paper, the relationship
between the three-month financial commercial paper and LIBOR rates has been distorted and volatile.
Such distortion has had and may continue to have a significant impact on the earnings and cash
flows of this portfolio.
Auction or remarketing based notes
The interest rates on certain of the Companys asset-backed securities are set and periodically
reset via a dutch auction (Auction Rate Securities) or through a remarketing utilizing
remarketing agents (Variable Rate Demand Notes). The Company is currently sponsor on
approximately $1.9 billion of Auction Rate Securities and $0.8 billion of Variable Rate Demand
Notes.
For Auction Rate Securities, investors and potential investors submit orders through a
broker-dealer as to the principal amount of notes they wish to buy, hold, or sell at various
interest rates. The broker-dealers submit their clients orders to the auction agent, who then
determines the clearing interest rate for the upcoming period. Interest rates on these Auction Rate
Securities are reset periodically, generally every 7 to 35 days, by the auction agent or agents.
During the first quarter of 2008, as part of the credit market crisis, auction rate securities from
various issuers failed to receive sufficient order interest from potential investors to clear
successfully, resulting in failed auction status. Since February 8, 2008, the Companys Auction
Rate Securities have failed in this manner. Under normal conditions, banks have historically
purchased these securities when investor demand is weak. However, since February 2008, banks have
been allowing auctions to fail. Currently, all of the Companys Auction Rate Securities are in a
failed auction status and the Company believes they will remain in a failed status for an extended
period of time and possibly permanently.
As a result of a failed auction, the Auction Rate Securities will generally pay interest to the
holder at a maximum rate as defined by the indenture. While these rates will vary, they will
generally be based on a spread to LIBOR or Treasury Securities. Due to the failed auctions related
to these securities, the Company has been and may continue to be subject to interest costs
substantially above the anticipated and historical rates paid on these types of securities.
The Company cannot predict whether future auctions related to its Auction Rate Securities will be
successful, but management believes it is likely auctions will continue to fail indefinitely. The
Company is currently seeking alternatives for reducing its exposure to the auction rate market, but
may not be able to achieve alternate financing for some or all of its Auction Rate Securities.
In
accordance with the various indentures, the Company expects to use
funds available in the trust
to such securities purchase for cash in open
market transactions, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise to redeem such securities. Under the terms of the indentures, the purchase price paid in any such transaction must be
less than the par amount of securities acquired. Any redemptions in
the normal course must be made at par. Any such transaction will
depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions,
compliance with securities laws, and other factors.
For Variable Rate Demand Notes, the remarketing agents set the price, which is then offered to
investors. If there are insufficient potential bid orders to purchase all of the notes offered for
sale, the Company could be subject to interest costs substantially above the anticipated and
historical rates paid on these types of securities.
Department of Educations Conduit Program
In January 2009, the Department published summary terms under which it will finance eligible FFELP
Stafford and PLUS loans in a conduit vehicle established to provide funding for student lenders.
Loans eligible for the Conduit Program must be first disbursed on or after October 1, 2003, but not
later than June 30, 2009, and fully disbursed before September 30, 2009, and meet certain other
requirements. The Conduit Program was launched on May 11, 2009. Funding for the Conduit Program is
provided by the capital markets at a cost based on market rates, with the Company being advanced 97
percent of the student loan face amount. The Conduit Program has a term of five years and expires
on May 8, 2014. The Student Loan Notes issued by the Conduit Program are supported by a combination
of (i) notes backed by FFELP loans, (ii) the Liquidity Agreement with the Federal Financing
Bank, and (iii) the Put Agreement provided by the Department. If the conduit does not have
sufficient funds to pay all Student Loan Notes then those Student Loan Notes will be repaid with
funds from the Federal Financing Bank. The Federal Financing Bank will hold the notes for a short
period of time and, if at the end of that time, the Student Loan Notes still cannot be paid off,
the underlying FFELP loans that serve as collateral to the Conduit Program will be sold to the Department through the Put Agreement
at a price of 97% of the face amount of the loans. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $1.1
billion of student loans funded through the Conduit Program and $1.0 billion borrowed under the
facility.
Funding New FFELP Student Loan Originations
As previously discussed, in July 2008, the Company did not renew its liquidity provisions on its
FFELP warehouse facility. Accordingly, the facility became a term facility and no new loan
originations could be funded with this facility. In August 2008, the Company began funding FFELP
Stafford and PLUS student loan originations for 2008-2009 academic year pursuant to a participation
agreement with Union Bank and the Departments Loan Participation Program.
65
Union Bank Participation Agreement
The Company maintains an agreement with Union Bank, as trustee for various grantor trusts, under
which Union Bank has agreed to purchase from the Company participation interests in student loans
(the FFELP Participation Agreement). The Company has the option to purchase the participation
interests from the grantor trusts at the end of a 364-day period upon termination of the
participation certificate. As of June 30, 2009, $786.3 million of loans were subject to outstanding
participation interests held by Union Bank, as trustee, under this agreement. The agreement
automatically renews annually and is terminable by either party upon five business days notice.
This agreement provides beneficiaries of Union Banks grantor trusts with access to investments in
interests in student loans, while providing liquidity to the Company on a short term basis. The
Company can participate loans to Union Bank to the extent of availability under the grantor trusts,
up to $750 million or an amount in excess of $750 million if mutually agreed to by both parties.
Loans participated under this agreement qualify as a sale pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No.
140. Accordingly, the participation interests sold are not included on the Companys consolidated
balance sheet.
Department of Educations Loan Participation and Purchase Commitment Programs
In August 2008, the Department implemented the Purchase and Participation Programs pursuant to
ECASLA. Under the Departments Purchase Program, the Department will purchase loans at a price
equal to the sum of (i) par value, (ii) accrued interest, (iii) the one percent origination fee
paid to the Department, and (iv) a fixed amount of $75 per loan. Under the Participation Program,
the Department provides interim short term liquidity to FFELP lenders by purchasing participation
interests in pools of FFELP loans. FFELP lenders are charged a rate of commercial paper plus 50
basis points on the principal amount of participation interests outstanding. Loans funded under the
Participation Program must be either refinanced by the lender or sold to the Department pursuant to
the Purchase Program prior to its expiration on September 30, 2009. To be eligible for purchase or
participation under the Departments programs, loans were originally limited to FFELP Stafford or
PLUS loans made for the academic year 2008-2009, first disbursed between May 1, 2008 and July 1,
2009, with eligible borrower benefits.
On October 7, 2008, legislation was enacted to extend the Departments authority to address FFELP
student loans made for the 2009-2010 academic year and allowing for the extension of the
Participation Program and Purchase Program from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010. The
Department indicated that loans for the 2008-2009 academic year which are funded under the
Departments Participation Program will need to be refinanced or sold to the Department prior to
September 30, 2009. On November 8, 2008, the Department announced the replication of the terms of
the Participation and Purchase Programs, in accordance with the October 7, 2008 legislation, which
will include FFELP student loans made for the 2009-2010 academic year.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $1.7 billion of FFELP loans funded using the Participation
Program, which are classified as held for sale on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. These
loans are expected to be sold to the Department under its Purchase Program. Upon selling the $1.7
billion in loans, the Company expects to recognize a gain of
$31 million to $34 million.
The Company plans to continue to use the Participation and Purchase Programs to fund loans
originated through the 2009-2010 academic year.
Unsecured Line of Credit
The Company has a $750.0 million unsecured line of credit that terminates in May 2012. As of June
30, 2009, there was $691.5 million outstanding on this line. The weighted average interest rate on this line of credit was 0.80% as of June 30, 2009. Upon
termination in 2012, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain this line
of credit, find alternative funding, or increase the amount outstanding under the line, if
necessary. The lending commitment under the Companys unsecured line of credit is provided by a
total of thirteen banks, with no individual bank representing more than 11% of the total lending
commitment. The bank lending group includes Lehman Brothers Bank, a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., which represents approximately 7% of the lending commitment under the line of
credit. On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Since the bankruptcy filing, the Company has
experienced funding delays from Lehman and does not expect Lehman to fund future borrowing
requests. As of June 30, 2009, excluding Lehmans lending commitment, the Company had $51.2
million available for future use under its unsecured line of credit.
The line of credit agreement contains certain financial covenants that, if not met, lead to an
event of default under the agreement. The covenants include maintaining:
|
|
|
A minimum consolidated net worth |
|
|
|
|
A minimum adjusted EBITDA to corporate debt interest (over the last four rolling
quarters) |
|
|
|
|
A limitation on subsidiary indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
A limitation on the percentage of non-guaranteed loans in the Companys portfolio |
As of June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of these requirements. Many of these
covenants are duplicated in the Companys other lending facilities, including its FFELP warehouse
facilities.
A
default on the 2009 FFELP Warehouse Facility would result in an event
of default on the Companys unsecured line of credit that would
result in the outstanding balance on the line of credit becoming
immediately due and payable.
66
The Companys operating line of credit does not have any covenants related to unsecured debt
ratings. However, changes in the Companys ratings (as well as the amounts the Company borrows)
have modest implications on the pricing level at which the Company obtains funding.
Unsecured Debt Offerings
In May 2005, the Company issued $275.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2010 Notes. The
2010 Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company. The interest rate on the 2010 Notes is 5.125%,
payable semiannually. At the Companys option, the 2010 Notes are redeemable in whole at any time
or in part from time to time at the redemption price described in the Companys prospectus
supplement.
During the first and second quarters of 2009, the Company purchased $34.9 million and $35.5
million, respectively, of the 2010 Notes for a purchase price of $26.8 million and $31.1 million,
respectively. These transactions resulted in a gain of $8.1 million and $4.4 million,
respectively. On July 28, 2009, the Company purchased $102.6 million of the 2010 Notes at par.
Subsequent to this transaction, the Company has $102.0 million of 2010 Notes outstanding.
In September 2006, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Junior
Subordinated Hybrid Securities (Hybrid Securities). The Hybrid Securities are unsecured
obligations of the Company. The interest rate on the Hybrid Securities from the date they were
issued through the optional redemption date, September 28, 2011, is 7.40%, payable semi-annually.
Beginning September 29, 2011 through September 29, 2036, the scheduled maturity date, the
interest rate on the Hybrid Securities will be equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.375%, payable
quarterly. The principal amount of the Hybrid Securities will become due on the scheduled maturity
date only to the extent that the Company has received proceeds from the sale of certain qualifying
capital securities prior to such date (as defined in the Hybrid Securities prospectus). If any
amount is not paid on the scheduled maturity date, it will remain outstanding and bear interest at
a floating rate as defined in the prospectus, payable monthly. On September 15, 2061, the Company
must pay any remaining principal and interest on the Hybrid Securities in full whether or not the
Company has sold qualifying capital securities. At the Companys option, the Hybrid Securities are
redeemable in whole at any time or in part from time to time at the redemption price described in
the prospectus supplement.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company purchased $1.75 million of its Hybrid Securities for
a purchase price of $0.35 million which resulted in a gain of $1.4 million.
Contractual Obligations
The Company is committed under noncancelable operating leases for certain office and warehouse
space and equipment. The Companys contractual obligations as of June 30, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Bonds and notes payable |
|
$ |
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
2,433,272 |
|
|
|
811,311 |
|
|
|
1,359,558 |
|
|
|
22,565,432 |
|
Operating lease obligations (a) |
|
|
31,096 |
|
|
|
8,624 |
|
|
|
12,828 |
|
|
|
8,449 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
Other |
|
|
36,863 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
16,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,237,532 |
|
|
|
2,461,896 |
|
|
|
841,002 |
|
|
|
1,368,007 |
|
|
|
22,566,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Operating lease obligations are presented net of approximately $2.1 million in sublease
arrangements. |
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had a reserve of $6.6 million for uncertain income tax
positions (including the federal benefit received from state positions and accrued interest) per the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). This
obligation is not included in the above table as the timing and resolution of the income tax
positions cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
The Company has an obligation to purchase $36.9 million of private loans from an unrelated
financial institution in quarterly installments of approximately $5.0 million through the third
quarter of 2010 with any remaining amount to be purchased at that time. This obligation is
included in other in the above table.
67
During the three and six month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company
participated $14.5 million and $65.0 million, respectively, of non-federally insured loans to third
parties. Loans participated under these agreements qualify as sales pursuant to the provisions of
SFAS No. 140. Accordingly, the participation interests sold are not included on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. Per the terms of the servicing agreements, the Companys servicing
operations is obligated to repurchase loans subject to the participation interests when such loans
become 60 or 90 days delinquent. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has $7.6 million accrued related to
this obligation which is included in other liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance
sheet. This obligation is not included in the above table.
The Company has commitments with its branding partners and forward flow lenders which obligate the
Company to purchase loans originated under specific criteria, although the branding partners and
forward flow lenders are typically not obligated to provide the Company with a minimum amount of
loans. These commitments generally run for periods ranging from one to five years and are
generally renewable. The Company has significant financing needs that it meets through the capital
markets, including the debt and secondary markets. Since August 2007, these markets have
experienced unprecedented disruptions, which are having an adverse impact on the Companys earnings
and financial condition. The Company cannot determine nor control the length of time or extent to
which the capital markets will remain disrupted. Accordingly, the Company has the ability to
exercise contractual rights to discontinue, suspend, or defer the acquisition of student loans in
connection with its branding and forward flow relationships. Commitments to purchase loans under
these arrangements are not included in the table above.
As a result of the Companys previous acquisitions, the Company has certain contractual obligations
or commitments as follows:
|
|
|
LoanSTAR Funding Group, Inc. (LoanSTAR) As part of the agreement for the acquisition
of the capital stock of LoanSTAR from the Greater Texas Foundation (Texas Foundation),
the Company agreed to sell student loans in an aggregate amount sufficient to permit the
Texas Foundation to maintain a portfolio of loans equal to no less than $200 million
through October 2010. The sales price for such loans is the fair value mutually agreed
upon between the Company and the Texas Foundation. To satisfy this obligation, the Company
is obligated to sell loans to the Texas Foundation on a quarterly basis; however, the
Foundation recently has chosen not to purchase such loans. |
|
|
|
|
infiNET Integrated Solutions, Inc. (infiNET) Stock price guarantee of $104.8375 per
share on 95,380 shares of Class A Common Stock (less the greater of $41.9335 or the gross
sales price such seller obtains from a sale of the shares occurring prior to February 28,
2011 as defined in the agreement) issued as part of the original purchase price. The
obligation to pay this guaranteed stock price is due February 28, 2011 and is not included
in the table above. Based upon the closing sale price of the Companys Class A Common
Stock as of June 30, 2009 of $13.59 per share, the Companys obligation under this stock
price guarantee would have been $6.0 million (($104.8375 $41.9335) x 95,380 shares). Any
cash paid by the Company in consideration of satisfying the guaranteed value of stock
issued for this acquisition would be recorded by the Company as a reduction to additional
paid-in capital. |
Sources of Liquidity
Sources of Liquidity Available for New FFELP Stafford and PLUS Loans
The Company has unlimited sources of primary liquidity available for new FFELP Stafford and PLUS
loan originations through the 2009-2010 academic year under the Departments
Participation and Purchase Programs. In addition, the Company maintains an agreement with Union
Bank, as trustee for various grantor trusts, under which Union Bank has agreed to purchase from the
Company participation interests in student loans. See Union Bank Participation Agreement
discussed earlier in this section.
Sources of Liquidity Available for General Corporate Purposes
The following table details the Companys primary sources of liquidity and the available capacity
at August 7, 2009 for general corporate purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of primary liquidity: (a) |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (b) |
|
$ |
345,000 |
|
Unencumbered FFELP student loan assets |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Unencumbered private student loan assets |
|
|
170,000 |
|
Unused unsecured line of credit (c) |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources of primary liquidity |
|
$ |
582,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The sources of primary liquidity table above does not include asset-backed security
investments. As part of the Companys issuance of asset-backed securitizations in March 2008
and May 2008, due to credit market conditions when these notes were issued, the Company
purchased the Class B subordinated notes of $36 million (par value) and $41 million (par
value), respectively. These notes are not included on the Companys consolidated balance
sheet. If the credit market conditions improve, the Company anticipates selling these notes to
third parties. Upon a sale to third parties, the Company would obtain cash proceeds equal to
the market value of the notes on the date of such sale. Upon sale, these notes would be shown
as bonds and notes payable on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Unless there is a
significant market improvement,
the Company believes the market value of such notes will be less than par value. The difference
between the par value and market value would be recognized by the Company as interest expense
over the life of the bonds. |
68
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The Company also has restricted cash and investments; however, the Company is limited in the
amounts of funds that can be transferred from its subsidiaries through intercompany loans,
advances, or cash dividends. These limitations result from the restrictions contained in trust
indentures under debt financing arrangements to which the Companys education lending
subsidiaries are parties. The Company does not believe these limitations will significantly
affect its operating cash needs. The amounts of cash and investments restricted in the
respective reserve accounts of the education lending subsidiaries are shown on the balance
sheets as restricted cash and investments. |
|
(c) |
|
The lending commitment under the Companys unsecured line of credit is provided by a total of
thirteen banks, with no individual bank representing more than 11% of the total lending
commitment. The bank lending group includes Lehman Brothers Bank, a subsidiary of Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc., which represents approximately 7% of the lending commitment under the
line of credit. On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Since the
bankruptcy filing, the Company has experienced funding delays from Lehman and does not expect
Lehman to fund future borrowing requests. The amount included in the table above excludes
Lehmans commitment. |
Dividends
In the first quarter of 2007, the Company began paying dividends of $0.07 per share on the
Companys Class A and Class B Common Stock which were paid quarterly through the first quarter of
2008. On May 21, 2008, the Company announced that it was temporarily suspending its quarterly
dividend program. The Company will continue to evaluate its dividend policy, which is subject to
future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other factors.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the
reporting periods. The Company bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on
various other factors that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under varying assumptions or conditions. Note 3 of the
consolidated financial statements, which are included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and
methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, particularly as they relate
to accounting policies that management believes are most critical that is, they are most
important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results of operations and they
require managements most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the
need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has
identified the following critical accounting policies that are discussed in more detail below:
allowance for loan losses, revenue recognition, impairment assessments related to goodwill and
intangible assets, income taxes, and accounting for derivatives.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable losses on student loans.
This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The Company evaluates the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on its federally insured loan portfolio separately from
its non-federally insured loan portfolio.
The allowance for the federally insured loan portfolio is based on periodic evaluations of the
Companys loan portfolios considering past experience, trends in student loan claims rejected for
payment by guarantors, changes to federal student loan programs, current economic conditions, and
other relevant factors. Should any of these factors change, the estimates made by management would
also change, which in turn would impact the level of the Companys future provision for loan
losses.
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on the non-federally insured loans,
the Company considers several factors including: loans in repayment versus those in a nonpaying
status, months in repayment, delinquency status, type of program, and trends in defaults in the
portfolio based on Company and industry data. Should any of these factors change, the estimates
made by management would also change, which in turn would impact the level of the Companys future
provision for loan losses. The Company places a non-federally insured loan on nonaccrual status
when the collection of principal and interest is 30 days past due and charges off the loan when the
collection of principal and interest is 120 days past due.
The allowance for federally insured and non-federally insured loans is maintained at a level
management believes is adequate to provide for estimated probable credit losses inherent in the
loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective because it requires estimates that may be
susceptible to significant changes.
69
Revenue Recognition
Student Loan Income The Company recognizes student loan income as earned, net of amortization of
loan premiums and deferred origination
costs. Loan income is recognized based upon the expected yield of the loan after giving effect to
borrower utilization of incentives such as principal reductions for timely payments (borrower
benefits) and other yield adjustments. The estimate of the borrower benefits discount is dependent
on the estimate of the number of borrowers who will eventually qualify for these benefits. For
competitive and liquidity purposes, the Company frequently changes the borrower benefit programs in
both amount and qualification factors. These programmatic changes must be reflected in the estimate
of the borrower benefit discount. Loan premiums, deferred origination costs, and borrower benefits
are included in the carrying value of the student loan on the consolidated balance sheet and are
amortized over the estimated life of the loan in accordance with SFAS No. 91, Accounting for
Non-Refundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct
Costs of Leases. The most sensitive estimate for loan premiums, deferred origination costs, and
borrower benefits is the estimate of the constant prepayment rate (CPR). CPR is a variable in the
life of loan estimate that measures the rate at which loans in a portfolio pay before their stated
maturity. The CPR is directly correlated to the average life of the portfolio. CPR equals the
percentage of loans that prepay annually as a percentage of the beginning of period balance. A
number of factors can affect the CPR estimate such as the rate of consolidation activity and
default rates. Should any of these factors change, the estimates made by management would also
change, which in turn would impact the amount of loan premium and deferred origination cost
amortization recognized by the Company in a particular period.
Other Income Other income is primarily attributable to fees for providing services and the sale
of lists and print products. Fees associated with services are recognized in the period services
are rendered and earned under service arrangements with clients where service fees are fixed or
determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Companys service fees are determined
based on written price quotations or service agreements having stipulated terms and conditions that
do not require management to make any significant judgments or assumptions regarding any potential
uncertainties. Revenue from the sale of lists and print products is generally earned and
recognized, net of estimated returns, upon shipment or delivery.
The Company assesses collectability of revenues and its allowance for doubtful accounts based on a
number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness
of the customer. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established to record accounts receivable at
estimated net realizable value. If the Company determines that collection of revenues is not
reasonably assured at or prior to delivery of the Companys services, revenue is recognized upon
the receipt of cash.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Impairment Assessments
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually and whenever triggering events or changes in
circumstances indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). The provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that
a two-step impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, the Company compares the
fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit
exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is considered not
impaired and the Company is not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the
net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the
Company must perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting units goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value, then the Company would record an impairment loss equal to the
difference.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins
used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and
market conditions, and determination of appropriate market comparables. Actual future results may
differ from those estimates.
The Company makes judgments about the recoverability of purchased intangible assets annually and
whenever triggering events or changes in circumstances indicate that an other than temporary
impairment may exist. Each quarter the Company evaluates the estimated remaining useful lives of
purchased intangible assets and whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to
the remaining periods of amortization. In accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, recoverability of these assets is measured by
comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future undiscounted cash flows the asset is
expected to generate. If the asset is considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is
measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.
Assumptions and estimates about future values and remaining useful lives of the Companys
intangible and other long-lived assets are complex and subjective. They can be affected by a
variety of factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal
factors such as changes in the Companys business strategy and internal forecasts. Although the
Company believes the historical assumptions and estimates used are reasonable and appropriate,
different assumptions and estimates could materially impact the reported financial results.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to the income tax laws of the U.S and its states and municipalities in which
the Company operates. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the
taxpayer and the relevant government taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax
expense, the Company must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these
inherently complex tax laws. The Company must also make estimates about when in the future certain
items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Disputes over interpretations of
the tax laws may be subject to review/adjudication by the court systems of the various tax
jurisdictions or may be settled
with the taxing authority upon examination or audit. The Company reviews these balances quarterly
and as new information becomes available, the balances are adjusted, as appropriate.
70
Derivative Accounting
The Company accounts for its derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 133
requires that every derivative instrument, including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts, be recorded at fair value on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability.
The Company determines the fair value for its derivative contracts using either (i) pricing models
that consider current market conditions and the contractual terms of the derivative contract or
(ii) counterparty valuations. These factors include interest rates, time value, forward interest
rate curve, and volatility factors, as well as foreign exchange rates. Pricing models and their
underlying assumptions impact the amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses recognized, and
the use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial results.
Management has structured all of the Companys derivative transactions with the intent that each is
economically effective. However, the Companys derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are
reported in current period earnings. Net settlements on derivatives are included in derivative
market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments and derivative settlements, net on the
consolidated statements of operations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157
are effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007
(January 1, 2008 for the Company) and is to be applied prospectively. The Company adopted SFAS No.
157 on January 1, 2008.
In February 2008, the FASB released FSP SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
which delayed the application of SFAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
For the Company, SFAS No. 157-2 was effective January 1, 2009. Effective January 1, 2009, the
Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which are
recorded at fair value only upon impairment.
In light of the recent economic turmoil occurring in the United States, the FASB released FSP SFAS
No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active (SFAS No. 157-3), on October 10, 2008. SFAS No. 157-3 clarified, among other things, that
quotes and other market inputs need not be solely used to determine fair value if they do not
relate to an active market. SFAS No. 157-3 points out that when relevant observable market
information is not available, an approach that incorporates managements judgments about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset in a current sale transaction
would be acceptable (such as a discounted cash flow analysis). Regardless of the valuation
technique applied, entities must include appropriate risk adjustments that market participants
would make, including adjustments for nonperformance risk (credit risk) and liquidity risk.
In April 2009, the FASB released FSP SFAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly (SFAS No. 157-4). SFAS No. 157-4 supersedes SFAS No. 157-3. SFAS No. 157-4
provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities when the volume and
level of activity for the asset/liability has significantly decreased. SFAS No. 157-4 also provides
guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. In addition, SFAS
No. 157-4 requires disclosure in interim and annual periods of the inputs and valuation techniques
used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques. SFAS No. 157-4 is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 (June 30, 2009 for the Company)
and shall be applied prospectively. SFAS No. 157-4 does not have a material impact on the
preparation of and disclosures in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160), which establishes new standards governing
the accounting for and reporting of noncontrolling interests (NCIs) in partially owned
consolidated subsidiaries and the loss of control of subsidiaries. Certain provisions of this
standard indicate, among other things, that NCIs (previously referred to as minority interests) be
treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability; that increases and decreases in the
parents ownership interest that leave control intact be treated as equity transactions, rather
than as step acquisitions or dilution gains or losses; and that losses of a partially owned
consolidated subsidiary be allocated to the NCI even when such allocation might result in a deficit
balance. This standard also requires changes to certain presentation and disclosure requirements.
For the Company, SFAS No. 160 was effective January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 160 does not have a material
impact on the preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements. The provisions of
the standard are to be applied to all NCIs prospectively, except for the presentation and
disclosure requirements, which are to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, which is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand the
effects of derivative instruments and hedging activities on an entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows.
71
The new standard also improves transparency about the location and amounts of derivative
instruments in an entitys financial statements, how derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The standard is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 (see note 5
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q).
In April 2009, the FASB released FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (SFAS No. 115-2/SFAS No. 124-2). SFAS No.
115-2/SFAS No. 124-2 amends the requirements for the recognition and measurement of
other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities by modifying the pre-existing intent and
ability indicator. Under SFAS No. 115-2/SFAS No. 124-2, an other-than-temporary impairment is
triggered when there is an intent to sell the security, it is more likely than not that the
security will be required to be sold before recovery, or the security is not expected to recover
the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Additionally, SFAS No. 115-2/SFAS No. 124-2
changes the presentation of an other-than-temporary impairment in the income statement for those
impairments involving credit losses. The credit loss component will be recognized in earnings and
the remainder of the impairment will be recorded in other comprehensive income. SFAS No. 115-2/SFAS
No. 124-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 (June 30, 2009 for
the Company). SFAS No. 115-1/SFAS No. 124-2 does not have a material impact on the preparation of
and disclosures in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB released FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosure about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 107-1). SFAS No. 107-1 requires interim disclosures
regarding the fair values of financial instruments that are within the scope of SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Additionally, SFAS No. 107-1 requires
disclosure of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments on an interim basis as well as changes of the methods and significant assumptions from
prior periods. SFAS No. 107-1 does not change the accounting treatment for these financial
instruments and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 (June 30,
2009 for the Company). The Company adopted SFAS No. 107-1 on June 30, 2009 (see note 8 in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It
requires entities to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for that date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June
15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 on June 30, 2009 (see note 1 in the notes to the
financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166). The objective of SFAS No. 166 is to improve
the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting
entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a
transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors
continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 removes the concept
of a qualifying special-purpose entity from Statement 140 and removes the exception from applying
FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to qualifying
special-purpose entities. Additionally, SFAS No. 166 defines the term participating interest to
establish specific conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale,
and also requires that a transferor recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets
obtained (including a transferors beneficial interest) and liabilities incurred as a result of a
transfer of financial assets accounted for as a sale. SFAS No. 166 is effective for fiscal periods
ending after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010 for the Company). The Company is currently
evaluating the impacts and disclosures related to SFAS No. 166.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167). SFAS No. 167 amends guidance in Interpretation 46 (R) for determining whether an entity is
a variable interest entity in addition to subjecting enterprises to a number of other requirements
including, among other things: (i) requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in
a variable interest entity and specifies the characteristics the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity must have to be designated as such; (ii) requiring an enterprise to assess whether
it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as
designed when determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable
interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance; (iii) requiring
the ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity; (iv) the elimination of the quantitative approach previously required for
determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and (v) adding an additional
reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any
changes in facts and circumstances occur such that investors of the equity investment at risk, as a
group, lose the power from voting or similar rights of the investment to direct the activities of
the entity that have the most significant impact on the entitys economic performance. SFAS No.
167 is effective for fiscal and interim periods ending after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010 for
the Company). The Company is currently evaluating the impacts and disclosures related to SFAS No.
167.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(SFAS No. 168). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the
source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. SFAS No. 168 is
effective for fiscal and interim periods ending after
September 15, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for the Company). The Company is currently evaluating the
impacts and disclosures related to SFAS No. 168.
72
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
(All dollars are in thousands, except share amounts, unless otherwise noted)
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys primary market risk exposure arises from fluctuations in its borrowing and lending
rates, the spread between which could impact the Company due to shifts in market interest rates.
Because the Company generates a significant portion of its earnings from its student loan spread,
the interest sensitivity of the balance sheet is a key profitability driver.
The following table sets forth the Companys loan assets and debt instruments by rate
characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
Fixed-rate loan assets |
|
$ |
8,517,251 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,532,609 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Variable-rate loan assets |
|
|
16,782,288 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
22,528,440 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,299,539 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
25,061,049 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate debt instruments |
|
$ |
591,661 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
$ |
677,096 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Variable-rate debt instruments |
|
|
26,577,912 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
26,110,863 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,169,573 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
26,787,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans originated prior to April 1, 2006 generally earn interest at the higher of a floating rate
based on the Special Allowance Payment or SAP formula set by the Department and the borrower rate,
which is fixed over a period of time. The SAP formula is based on an applicable index plus a fixed
spread that is dependent upon when the loan was originated, the loans repayment status, and
funding sources for the loan. The Company generally finances its student loan portfolio with
variable rate debt. In low and/or declining interest rate environments, when the fixed borrower
rate is higher than the rate produced by the SAP formula, the Companys student loans earn at a
fixed rate while the interest on the variable rate debt typically continues to decline. In these
interest rate environments, the Company may earn additional spread income that it refers to as
floor income.
Depending on the type of loan and when it was originated, the borrower rate is either fixed to term
or is reset to an annual rate each July 1. As a result, for loans where the borrower rate is fixed
to term, the Company may earn floor income for an extended period of time, which the Company refers
to as fixed rate floor income, and for those loans where the borrower rate is reset annually on
July 1, the Company may earn floor income to the next reset date, which the Company refers to as
variable rate floor income. In accordance with new legislation enacted in 2006, lenders are
required to rebate fixed rate floor income and variable rate floor income to the Department for all
new FFELP loans first originated on or after April 1, 2006.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, loan interest income includes approximately
$37.1 million and $9.9 million, respectively, of fixed rate floor income. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, loan interest income includes approximately $67.3 million and $18.4
million, respectively, of fixed rate floor income, respectively.
As a result of the ongoing volatility of interest rates, effective October 1, 2008, the Company
changed its calculation of variable rate floor income to better reflect the economic benefit
received by the Company related to this income taking into consideration the volatility of certain
rate indices which offset the value received. The economic benefit received by the Company related
to variable rate floor income was $6.0 million and $19.3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $7.5 million and $25.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Variable rate floor income calculated on a statutory maximum
basis was $13.0 million and $21.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $23.8 million and $40.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Absent the use of derivative instruments, a rise in interest rates may reduce the amount of floor
income received and this may have an impact on earnings due to interest margin compression caused
by increasing financing costs, until such time as the federally insured loans earn interest at a
variable rate in accordance with their special allowance payment formulas. In higher interest rate
environments, where the interest rate rises above the borrower rate and fixed rate loans
effectively become variable rate loans, the impact of the rate fluctuations is reduced.
73
The following graph depicts fixed rate floor income for a borrower with a fixed rate of 6.75% and a
SAP rate of 2.64%:
The following table shows the Companys student loan assets that are earning fixed rate floor
income as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrower/ |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Balance of |
|
Fixed |
|
lender |
|
|
variable |
|
|
assets earning fixed-rate |
|
interest |
|
weighted |
|
|
conversion |
|
|
floor income as of |
|
rate range |
|
average yield |
|
|
rate (a) |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
3.0 3.49% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
$ |
1,422,021 |
|
3.5 3.99% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1,964,657 |
|
4.0 4.49% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1,560,391 |
|
4.5 4.99% |
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
857,487 |
|
5.0 5.49% |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
562,170 |
|
5.5 5.99% |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
333,278 |
|
6.0 6.49% |
|
|
6.19 |
% |
|
|
3.55 |
% |
|
|
393,323 |
|
6.5 6.99% |
|
|
6.70 |
% |
|
|
4.06 |
% |
|
|
349,130 |
|
7.0 7.49% |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
4.53 |
% |
|
|
119,331 |
|
7.5 7.99% |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
204,825 |
|
8.0 8.99% |
|
|
8.16 |
% |
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
467,583 |
|
> 9.0% |
|
|
9.04 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
283,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,517,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The estimated variable conversion rate is the
estimated short-term interest rate at which loans
would convert to variable rate. |
The following table summarizes the outstanding derivatives instruments as of June 30, 2009 used by
the Company to hedge fixed-rate student loan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average fixed |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
rate paid by |
|
Maturity |
|
Amount |
|
|
the Company (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For all interest rate derivatives for which the Company pays a fixed rate, the Company
receives discrete three-month LIBOR. |
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $3.5 billion of student loan assets that were eligible to
earn variable-rate floor income.
74
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk in the form of basis risk and repricing risk because
the interest rate characteristics of the Companys assets do not match the interest rate
characteristics of the funding. The Company attempts to match the interest rate characteristics of
certain pools of loan assets with debt instruments of substantially similar characteristics. Due to
the variability in duration of the Companys assets and varying market conditions, the Company does
not attempt to perfectly match the interest rate characteristics of the entire loan portfolio with
the underlying debt instruments. The Company has adopted a policy of periodically reviewing the
mismatch related to the interest rate characteristics of its assets and liabilities together with
the Companys outlook as to current and future market conditions. Based on those factors, the
Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall risk management strategy. Derivative
instruments used as part of the Companys interest rate risk management strategy currently include
basis swaps and cross-currency swaps.
The following table presents the Companys FFELP student loan assets and related funding arranged
by underlying indices as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
Frequency of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
that funded |
|
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
student loan |
|
Index (f) |
|
Resets |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
assets (a) |
|
3 month H15 financial commercial
paper (b) |
|
Daily |
|
$ |
23,981,416 |
|
|
|
1,741,481 |
|
3 month Treasury bill |
|
Varies |
|
|
1,117,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 month LIBOR (c) |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,063,227 |
|
Auction-rate or remarketing |
|
Varies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,606,740 |
|
Asset-backed commercial paper (d) |
|
Varies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,444,536 |
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,797 |
|
Other (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
945,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,044,781 |
|
|
|
26,044,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company has certain basis swaps outstanding in which the Company (i) receives
three-month LIBOR set discretely in advance and pays a daily weighted average three-month
LIBOR less a spread as defined in the individual agreements (the Average/Discrete Basis
Swaps); and (ii) receives three-month LIBOR and pays one-month LIBOR plus or minus a spread
as defined in the agreements (the 1/3 Basis Swaps). The Company entered into these
derivative instruments to better match the interest rate characteristics on its student loan
assets and the debt funding such assets. The following table summarizes these derivatives as
of June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
|
Average/Discrete |
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Basis Swaps |
|
|
1/3 Basis Swaps (c) |
|
|
2009 (a) |
|
$ |
7,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (b) |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
(a) Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company terminated all of the Average/Discrete Basis
Swaps with a maturity in 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
Certain of these derivatives have forward effective start dates of January 2010 ($1.5
billion), February 2010 ($1.5 billion), and March 2010 ($1.5 billion). |
|
(c) |
|
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company entered into additional 1/3 Basis Swaps with
notional amounts of $500.0 million and $150.0 million with maturity dates in 2014 and 2039,
respectively. |
75
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The Companys FFELP student loans earn interest based on the daily average H15
financial commercial paper index calculated on a fiscal quarter. The Companys funding
includes FFELP student loans under the Departments Participation Program. The interest
rate on the principal amount of participation interests outstanding under the Departments
Participation Program is based on a rate of commercial paper plus 50 basis points, which is
set a quarter in arrears, while the earnings on the student loans is based primarily on the
daily average H15 financial commercial paper index calculated on the current fiscal quarter.
Due to a declining interest rate environment during the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, the Companys core student loan spread was compressed due to the mismatch in the
timing of these rate resets. |
|
(c) |
|
The Company has Euro-denominated notes that reprice on the EURIBOR index. The
Company has entered into derivative instruments (cross-currency interest rate swaps) that
convert the EURIBOR index to 3 month LIBOR. As a result, these notes are reflected in the 3
month LIBOR category in the above table. See Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. |
|
(d) |
|
Asset-backed commercial paper consists of $0.4 million
funded in the Companys FFELP warehouse facility and $1.0 billion funded through the
Departments Conduit Program. Funding for the Conduit Program is provided by the capital markets at a cost based on market rates.
|
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Assets include restricted cash and investments and other assets. |
|
(f) |
|
Historically, the movement of the various interest rate indices received on the
Companys student loan assets and paid on the debt to fund such loans was highly correlated.
The short term movement of the indices was dislocated beginning in August 2007. This
dislocation has had a negative impact on the Companys student loan net interest income. |
Financial Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments
The Company accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 133
requires that changes in the fair value of derivative instruments be recognized currently in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria as specified by SFAS No. 133 are met. Management
has structured all of the Companys derivative transactions with the intent that each is
economically effective. However, the Companys derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133; consequently, the change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in the Companys operating results. Changes or shifts in the forward yield
curve and fluctuations in currency rates can significantly impact the valuation of the Companys
derivatives. Accordingly, changes or shifts to the forward yield curve and fluctuations in currency
rates will impact the financial position and results of operations of the Company. The change in
fair value of the Companys derivatives are included in derivative market value, foreign currency,
and put option adjustments and derivative settlements, net in the Companys consolidated
statements of operations and resulted in income of $29.9 million and expense of $22.3 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and income of $11.5 million and $47.5
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
The following summarizes the derivative settlements included in derivative market value, foreign
currency, and put option adjustments and derivative settlements, net on the consolidated
statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
(7,842 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11,019 |
) |
Average/Discrete Basis Swaps |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
44,711 |
|
1/3 Basis Swaps |
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,401 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
7,131 |
|
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
10,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total settlements |
|
$ |
9,535 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
33,893 |
|
|
|
45,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
Sensitivity Analysis
The following tables summarize the effect on the Companys earnings,
based upon a sensitivity analysis performed by the Company assuming
hypothetical increases in interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points
while funding spreads remain constant. In addition, as it relates to
the effect on earnings, a sensitivity analysis was performed assuming
the funding index increases 10 basis points while holding the asset
index constant, if the funding index is different than the asset index.
The effect on earnings was performed on the Companys variable rate assets
and liabilities. The analysis includes the effects of the Companys interest
rate and basis swaps in existence during these periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Asset and funding index |
|
|
|
Change from decrease of 100 |
|
|
Change from increase of 100 |
|
|
mismatches |
|
|
|
basis points |
|
|
basis points |
|
|
Increase of 10 basis points |
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
Effect on earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in pre-tax net income before
impact of derivative settlements |
|
$ |
34,046 |
|
|
|
241.1 |
% |
|
|
(34,046 |
) |
|
|
(241.1 |
)% |
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
|
|
45.4 |
% |
Impact of derivative settlements |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net income before taxes |
|
$ |
34,005 |
|
|
|
240.8 |
% |
|
|
(34,005 |
) |
|
|
(240.8 |
)% |
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
|
|
45.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in basic and diluted
earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Asset and funding index |
|
|
|
Change from decrease of 100 |
|
|
Change from increase of 100 |
|
|
mismatches |
|
|
|
basis points |
|
|
basis points |
|
|
Increase of 10 basis points |
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
Effect on earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in pre-tax net income before
impact of derivative settlements |
|
$ |
10,566 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
(10,566 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
)% |
|
|
(6,681 |
) |
|
|
(10.8) |
% |
Impact of derivative settlements |
|
|
(8,492 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
8,492 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net income before taxes |
|
$ |
2,074 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
(2,074 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
|
|
(6,681 |
) |
|
|
(10.8) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in basic and diluted
earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Change from decrease of 100 |
|
|
Change from increase of 100 |
|
|
Change from increase of 200 |
|
|
|
basis points |
|
|
basis points |
|
|
basis points |
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
Effect on earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in pre-tax net income before
impact of derivative settlements |
|
$ |
68,402 |
|
|
|
124.0 |
% |
|
|
(63,076 |
) |
|
|
(114.3 |
)% |
|
|
(12,757 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
)% |
Impact of derivative settlements |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net income before taxes |
|
$ |
68,361 |
|
|
|
123.9 |
% |
|
|
(63,035 |
) |
|
|
(114.2 |
)% |
|
|
(12,757 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in basic and diluted
earning per share |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Change from decrease of 100 |
|
|
Change from increase of 100 |
|
|
Change from increase of 200 |
|
|
|
basis points |
|
|
basis points |
|
|
basis points |
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
Effect on earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in pre-tax net income before
impact of derivative settlements |
|
$ |
22,151 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
% |
|
|
(22,151 |
) |
|
|
(56.4 |
)% |
|
|
(6,806 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
)% |
Impact of derivative settlements |
|
|
(14,785 |
) |
|
|
(37.6 |
) |
|
|
14,785 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net income before taxes |
|
$ |
7,366 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
(7,366 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
)% |
|
|
(6,806 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in basic and diluted
earning per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
During 2006, the Company completed separate debt offerings of student loan asset-backed securities
that included 420.5 million and 352.7 million Euro-denominated notes with interest rates based on a
spread to the EURIBOR index. As a result of this transaction, the Company is exposed to market risk
related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and Euro. The
principal and accrued interest on these notes is re-measured at each reporting period and recorded
on the Companys balance sheet in U.S. dollars based on the foreign currency exchange rate on that
date. Changes in the principal and accrued interest amounts as a result of foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations are included in the derivative market value, foreign currency, and put
option adjustments and derivative settlements, net in the Companys consolidated statements of
operations.
77
The Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps in connection with the issuance of the
Euro Notes. Under the terms of these derivative instrument agreements, the Company receives from a
counterparty a spread to the EURIBOR index based on notional amounts of 420.5 million and 352.7
million and pays a spread to the LIBOR index based on notional amounts of $500.0 million and $450.0
million, respectively. In addition, under the terms of these agreements, all principal payments on
the Euro Notes will effectively be paid at the exchange
rate in effect as of the issuance of the notes. The Company did not qualify these derivative
instruments as hedges under SFAS No. 133; consequently, the change in fair value is included in the
Companys operating results.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded an expense of $63.9 million
and $16.6 million, respectively, as a result of re-measurement of the Euro Notes and income of
$41.2 million and a loss of $15.9 million, respectively, for the change in the fair value of the
related derivative instruments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company
recorded income of $4.4 million and an expense of $88.5 million, respectively, as a result of the
re-measurement of the Euro Notes and a loss of $2.4 million and income of $91.7 million,
respectively, for the change in the fair value of the related derivative instruments. These amounts
are included in derivative market value, foreign currency, and put option adjustments and
derivative settlements, net on the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
The re-measurement of the Euro-denominated bonds generally correlates with the change in fair value
of the cross-currency interest rate swaps. However, the Company will experience unrealized gains or
losses related to the cross-currency interest rate swaps if the two underlying indices (and related
forward curve) do not move in parallel. Management intends to hold the cross-currency interest rate
swaps through the maturity of the Euro-denominated bonds.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under supervision and with the participation of certain members of the Companys management,
including the chief executive and the chief
financial officers, the Company completed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, the Companys
chief executive and chief financial officers believe that the disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with
respect to timely communication to them and other members of management responsible for preparing
periodic reports and material information required to be disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q as it relates to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The effectiveness of the Companys or any system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject
to certain limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing, and
evaluating the controls and procedures, the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of
future events, and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. As a result, there can be no
assurance that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors or fraud or
ensure that all material information will be made known to appropriate management in a timely
fashion. By their nature, the Companys or any system of disclosure controls and procedures can
provide only reasonable assurance regarding managements control objectives.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the Companys
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
General
The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits, and proceedings that arise in the normal course
of business. These matters principally consist of claims by student loan borrowers disputing the
manner in which their student loans have been processed and disputes with other business entities.
In addition, from time to time the Company receives information and document requests from state or
federal regulators concerning its business practices. The Company cooperates with these inquiries
and responds to the requests. While the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any inquiry
or investigation, the Company believes its activities have materially complied with applicable law,
including the Higher Education Act, the rules and regulations adopted by the Department of
Education thereunder, and the Departments guidance regarding those rules and regulations. On the
basis of present information, anticipated insurance coverage, and advice received from counsel, it
is the opinion of the Companys management that the disposition or ultimate determination of these
claims, lawsuits, and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, financial position, or results of operations.
78
Municipal Derivative Bid Practices Investigation
As previously disclosed, on February 8, 2008, Shockley Financial Corp. (SFC), an indirect,
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that provides investment advisory services for the
investment of proceeds from the issuance of municipal and corporate bonds, received a grand jury
subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York upon application
of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The subpoena seeks certain
information and documents from SFC in connection with DOJs criminal investigation of the bond
industry with respect to possible anti-competitive practices related to awards of guaranteed
investment contracts and other products for the investment of proceeds from bond issuances. SFC
currently has one employee. The Company and SFC are cooperating with the investigation.
On March 5, 2008, SFC received a subpoena from the SEC related to a similar investigation. In
addition, on June 6, 2008 and June 12, 2008, SFC received subpoenas from the New York Attorney
General and the Florida Attorney General, respectively, relating to their similar investigations.
Each of the subpoenas seeks information similar to that of the DOJ. The Company and SFC are
cooperating with these investigations.
SFC was also named as a defendant in a number of substantially identical purported class action
lawsuits, which as of June 16, 2008 have been consolidated before the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York, under the caption In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation.
The consolidated suit (the Suit) alleges several financial institutions and financial service
provider defendants engaged in a conspiracy not to compete and to fix prices and rig bids for
municipal derivatives (including GICs) sold to issuers of municipal bonds. The Suit also asserts
claims for violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, fraudulent concealment, unfair competition
and violation of the California Cartwright Act.
On January 30, 2009, SFC entered into a Tolling and Cooperation Agreement (Tolling Agreement)
with a number of the plaintiffs involved in the Suit. In connection with the Tolling Agreement, on
February 5, 2009 SFC was voluntarily dismissed from the Suit, without prejudice, on motion of the
plaintiffs who are parties to the Tolling Agreement. On March 2, 2009, SFC entered into a second
Tolling Agreement with the remainder of the plaintiffs involved in the Suit, and on March 3, 2009,
SFC was voluntarily dismissed from the Suit without prejudice, on motion of the plaintiffs who are
parties to the second Tolling Agreement. On April 30, 2009, the court granted a motion by several
defendants, including SFC, to dismiss the class action complaint, with the plaintiffs granted the
opportunity to file an amended complaint to replead claims.
SFC, the Company, or other subsidiaries of the Company may receive subpoenas from other regulatory
agencies. Due to the preliminary nature of these matters as to SFC, the Company is unable to
predict the ultimate outcome of the investigations or the Suit.
Regulatory Reviews
In connection with the Companys settlement with the Department of Education in January 2007 to
resolve the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Education (the OIG) audit report
with respect to the Companys student loan portfolio receiving special allowance payments at a
minimum 9.5% interest rate, the Company was informed in February 2007 by the Department of
Education that a civil attorney with the Department of Justice had opened a file regarding the
issues set forth in the OIG report, which the Company understands is common procedure following an
OIG audit report. The Company has engaged in discussions with and provided information to the DOJ
in connection with the review.
By letter dated November 18, 2008, the DOJ requested that the Company provide the DOJ certain
documents and information related to the Companys compliance with the prohibited inducement
provisions of the Higher Education Act and associated regulations. The Company responded to the
DOJs requests and is cooperating with their review.
The Department of Education periodically reviews participants in the FFELP for compliance with
program provisions. On June 28, 2007, the Department notified the Company that it would be
conducting a review of the Companys practices in connection with the prohibited inducement
provisions of the Higher Education Act and the associated regulations that allow borrowers to have
a choice of lenders. The Company understands that the Department selected several schools and
lenders for review. The Company responded to the Departments requests for information and
documentation and cooperated with their review. On May 1, 2009, the Company received the
Departments preliminary program review report, which covered the Departments review of the period
from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2007. The preliminary program review report contained
certain initial findings of noncompliance with the Higher Education Acts prohibited inducement
provisions and required that the Company provide an explanation for the basis of the arrangements
noted in the preliminary program review report. The Company has responded and provided an
explanation of the arrangements noted in the Departments initial findings, and the Department is
expected to issue a final program review determination letter and advise the Company whether it
intends to take any additional action. To the extent any findings are contained in a final letter,
the additional action may include the assessment of fines or penalties, or the limitation,
suspension, and termination of the Companys participation in FFELP.
While the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these reviews, the Company believes
its practices complied with applicable law, including the provisions of the Higher Education Act,
the rules and regulations adopted by the Department of Education thereunder, and the Departments
guidance regarding those rules and regulations.
79
There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 in response to Item 1A of Part I of such Form
10-K.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
Stock Repurchases
The following table summarizes the repurchases of Class A common stock during the second quarter of
2009 by the Company or any affiliated purchaser of the Company, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Maximum number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased |
|
|
of shares that may |
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as part of publicly |
|
|
yet be purchased |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
price paid |
|
|
announced plans |
|
|
under the plans |
|
Period |
|
purchased (1) |
|
|
per share |
|
|
or programs (2) (3) |
|
|
or programs (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1 April 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
7.24 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
10,891,276 |
|
May 1 May 31, 2009 |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
9,154,379 |
|
June 1 June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
8.12 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
7,526,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
$ |
7.64 |
|
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares includes: (i) shares purchased pursuant to the 2006
Plan discussed in footnote (2) below; and (ii) shares purchased pursuant to the 2006
ESLP discussed in footnote (3) below, of which there were none for the months of April,
May, or June 2009. Shares of Class A common stock purchased pursuant to the 2006 Plan
included 1,054 shares, 632 shares, and 1,643 shares in April, May, and June,
respectively, that had been issued to the Companys 401(k) plan and allocated to
employee participant accounts pursuant to the plans provisions for Company matching
contributions in shares of Company stock, and were purchased by the Company from the
plan pursuant to employee participant instructions to dispose of such shares. |
|
(2) |
|
On May 25, 2006, the Company publicly announced that its Board of Directors had
authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to a total of five million shares
of the Companys Class A common stock (the 2006 Plan). On February 7, 2007, the
Companys Board of Directors increased the total shares the Company is allowed to
repurchase to 10 million. The 2006 Plan had an initial expiration date of May 24, 2008,
which was extended until May 24, 2010 by the Companys Board of Directors on January 30,
2008. |
|
(3) |
|
On May 25, 2006, the Company publicly announced that the shareholders of the
Company approved an Employee Stock Purchase Loan Plan (the 2006 ESLP) to allow the
Company to make loans to employees for the purchase of shares of the Companys Class A
common stock either in the open market or directly from the Company. A total of $40
million in loans may be made under the 2006 ESLP, and a total of one million shares of
Class A common stock are reserved for issuance under the 2006 ESLP. Shares may be
purchased directly from the Company or in the open market through a broker at prevailing
market prices at the time of purchase, subject to any conditions or restrictions on the
timing, volume, or prices of purchases as determined by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors and set forth in the Stock Purchase Loan Agreement with the
participant. The 2006 ESLP shall terminate May 25, 2016. |
|
(4) |
|
The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans is
calculated below. There are no assurances that any additional shares will be
repurchased under either the 2006 Plan or the 2006 ESLP. Shares under the 2006 ESLP may
be issued by the Company rather than purchased in open market transactions. |
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B / C) |
|
|
(A + D) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate dollar |
|
|
Closing price on |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
Maximum number of |
|
|
value of shares that |
|
|
the last trading day |
|
|
number of shares |
|
|
number of shares |
|
|
|
shares that may yet |
|
|
may yet be |
|
|
of the Companys |
|
|
that may yet be |
|
|
that may yet be |
|
|
|
be purchased under the |
|
|
purchased under |
|
|
Class A Common |
|
|
purchased under |
|
|
purchased under |
|
|
|
2006 Plan |
|
|
the 2006 ESLP |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
the 2006 ESLP |
|
|
the 2006 Plan and |
|
As of |
|
(A) |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
(C) |
|
|
(D) |
|
|
2006 ESLP |
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
4,846,500 |
|
|
|
36,450,000 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
6,044,776 |
|
|
|
10,891,276 |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
4,845,868 |
|
|
|
36,450,000 |
|
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
4,308,511 |
|
|
|
9,154,379 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
4,844,225 |
|
|
|
36,450,000 |
|
|
|
13.59 |
|
|
|
2,682,119 |
|
|
|
7,526,344 |
|
Working capital and dividend restrictions/limitations
The Companys credit facilities, including its revolving line of credit which is available through
May of 2012, impose restrictions on the Companys minimum consolidated net worth, the ratio of the
Companys Adjusted EBITDA to corporate debt interest, the indebtedness of the Companys
subsidiaries, and the ratio of Non-FFELP loans to all loans in the Companys portfolio. In
addition, trust indentures and other financing agreements governing debt issued by the Companys
education lending subsidiaries may have general limitations on the amounts of funds that can be
transferred to the Company by its subsidiaries through cash dividends.
On September 27, 2006 the Company consummated a debt offering of $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of Hybrid Securities. So long as any Hybrid Securities remain outstanding, if the Company
gives notice of its election to defer interest payments but the related deferral period has not yet
commenced or a deferral period is continuing, then the Company will not, and will not permit any of
its subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make a
liquidation payment regarding, any of the Companys capital stock |
|
|
|
|
except as required in connection with the repayment of principal, and except for any
partial payments of deferred interest that may be made through the alternative payment
mechanism described in the Hybrid Securities indenture, make any payment of principal of,
or interest or premium, if any, on, or repay, repurchase, or redeem any of the Companys
debt securities that rank pari passu with or junior to the Hybrid Securities |
|
|
|
|
make any guarantee payments regarding any guarantee by the Company of the subordinated
debt securities of any of the Companys subsidiaries if the guarantee ranks pari passu with
or junior in interest to the Hybrid Securities |
In addition, if any deferral period lasts longer than one year, the limitation on the Companys
ability to redeem or repurchase any of its securities that rank pari passu with or junior in
interest to the Hybrid Securities will continue until the first anniversary of the date on which
all deferred interest has been paid or cancelled.
If the Company is involved in a business combination where immediately after its consummation more
than 50% of the surviving entitys voting stock is owned by the shareholders of the other party to
the business combination, then the immediately preceding sentence will not apply to any deferral
period that is terminated on the next interest payment date following the date of consummation of
the business combination.
However, at any time, including during a deferral period, the Company will be permitted to:
|
|
|
pay dividends or distributions in additional shares of the Companys capital stock |
|
|
|
|
declare or pay a dividend in connection with the implementation of a shareholders
rights plan, or issue stock under such a plan, or redeem or repurchase any rights
distributed pursuant to such a plan |
|
|
|
|
purchase common stock for issuance pursuant to any employee benefit plans |
81
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
At the Companys annual meeting of shareholders held on May 20, 2009, the following proposals were
submitted to a vote of shareholders and were approved by the margins indicated:
1. |
|
To elect nine directors to serve on the Companys Board of Directors for one-year terms
or until their successors are elected and qualified. All directors seeking election were in
attendance at the annual meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
|
Votes Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
James P. Abel |
|
|
142,857,237 |
|
|
|
609,155 |
|
|
|
6,101 |
|
Stephen F. Butterfield |
|
|
143,189,176 |
|
|
|
281,445 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
Michael S. Dunlap |
|
|
142,781,175 |
|
|
|
690,568 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
Kathleen A. Farrell |
|
|
142,966,264 |
|
|
|
498,367 |
|
|
|
7,861 |
|
Thomas E. Henning |
|
|
142,863,876 |
|
|
|
602,379 |
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
Brian J. OConnor |
|
|
142,860,435 |
|
|
|
604,721 |
|
|
|
7,336 |
|
Kimberly K. Rath |
|
|
142,884,524 |
|
|
|
575,571 |
|
|
|
12,397 |
|
Michael D. Reardon |
|
|
142,861,471 |
|
|
|
598,786 |
|
|
|
12,236 |
|
James H. Van Horn |
|
|
142,881,278 |
|
|
|
580,411 |
|
|
|
10,803 |
|
2. |
|
To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
142,875,383
|
|
583,144
|
|
13,965 |
3. |
|
To approve an amendment to the Restricted Stock Plan to increase the authorized number
of shares of Class A common stock that may be issued under the plan from a total of
2,000,000 shares to a total of 4,000,000 shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
138,450,966
|
|
382,345
|
|
4,821 |
82
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
+ |
|
Nelnet, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan, as amended through May 20, 2009,
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on May 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
* |
|
Funding Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2009, among
Straight-A Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as
Conduit Lender, Nelnet Super Conduit Funding, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, as Funding Note Issuer, First National
Bank, a national banking association, as Eligible Lender Trustee,
The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York banking corporation, as
Conduit Administrator for the Conduit Lender, as Securities
Intermediary and as Conduit Lender Eligible Lender Trustee, National
Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as the SPV
Administrator for the Funding Note Issuer, Nelnet, Inc., a Nebraska
corporation, as Sponsor, BMO Capital Markets Corp., a Delaware
company, as Manager for the Conduit Lender, and National Education
Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as Master Servicer. |
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
* |
|
Eligible Lender Trust Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2009 between
Nelnet Super Conduit Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, and Zions First National Bank, a national banking
association, not in its individual capacity but solely as eligible
lender trustee on behalf and for the benefit of the Funding Note
Issuer. |
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
* |
|
Student Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2009, among
National Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Union
Bank and Trust Company, a Nebraska banking corporation, not in its
individual capacity but solely as eligible lender trustee for the
benefit of the Seller and its assigns, Nelnet Super Conduit Funding,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Zions First National
Bank, a national banking association, not in its individual capacity
but solely as eligible lender trustee for the benefit of the
Purchaser and its assigns. |
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
+ |
|
Nelnet, Inc. Second Amended Executive Officers Bonus Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on May 11, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 of Chief Executive Officer Michael S. Dunlap. |
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 of Chief Financial Officer Terry J. Heimes. |
|
|
|
|
32 |
** |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
+ |
|
Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement |
83
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NELNET, INC.
|
|
Date: August 10, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ MICHAEL S. DUNLAP
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Michael S. Dunlap |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ TERRY J. HEIMES
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Terry J. Heimes |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
84
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
+ |
|
Nelnet, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan, as amended through May 20, 2009,
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on May 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
* |
|
Funding Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2009, among
Straight-A Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as
Conduit Lender, Nelnet Super Conduit Funding, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, as Funding Note Issuer, First National
Bank, a national banking association, as Eligible Lender Trustee,
The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York banking corporation, as
Conduit Administrator for the Conduit Lender, as Securities
Intermediary and as Conduit Lender Eligible Lender Trustee, National
Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as the SPV
Administrator for the Funding Note Issuer, Nelnet, Inc., a Nebraska
corporation, as Sponsor, BMO Capital Markets Corp., a Delaware
company, as Manager for the Conduit Lender, and National Education
Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as Master Servicer. |
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
* |
|
Eligible Lender Trust Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2009 between
Nelnet Super Conduit Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, and Zions First National Bank, a national banking
association, not in its individual capacity but solely as eligible
lender trustee on behalf and for the benefit of the Funding Note
Issuer. |
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
* |
|
Student Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2009, among
National Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Union
Bank and Trust Company, a Nebraska banking corporation, not in its
individual capacity but solely as eligible lender trustee for the
benefit of the Seller and its assigns, Nelnet Super Conduit Funding,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Zions First National
Bank, a national banking association, not in its individual capacity
but solely as eligible lender trustee for the benefit of the
Purchaser and its assigns. |
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
+ |
|
Nelnet, Inc. Second Amended Executive Officers Bonus Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on May 11, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 of Chief Executive Officer Michael S. Dunlap. |
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 of Chief Financial Officer Terry J. Heimes. |
|
|
|
|
32
|
** |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
+ |
|
Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement |
85