FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-11656
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
42-1283895 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
110 N. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
(312) 960-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N / A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þYes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted
pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No
o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
The number of shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on May 5, 2009 was 313,765,799.
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
INDEX
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1: Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
3,359,714 |
|
|
$ |
3,354,480 |
|
Buildings and equipment |
|
|
23,361,227 |
|
|
|
23,609,132 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(4,388,406 |
) |
|
|
(4,240,222 |
) |
Developments in progress |
|
|
1,004,869 |
|
|
|
1,076,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
23,337,404 |
|
|
|
23,800,065 |
|
Investment in and loans to/from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
1,864,353 |
|
|
|
1,869,929 |
|
Investment property and property held for development and sale |
|
|
1,774,681 |
|
|
|
1,823,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
|
26,976,438 |
|
|
|
27,493,356 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
195,745 |
|
|
|
168,993 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
385,982 |
|
|
|
385,334 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
230,901 |
|
|
|
340,291 |
|
Deferred expenses, net |
|
|
325,333 |
|
|
|
333,901 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
789,013 |
|
|
|
835,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
28,903,412 |
|
|
$ |
29,557,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
24,702,810 |
|
|
$ |
24,756,577 |
|
Investment in and loans to/from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
31,922 |
|
|
|
32,294 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
867,866 |
|
|
|
868,978 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,347,854 |
|
|
|
1,539,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
26,950,452 |
|
|
|
27,196,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
120,756 |
|
|
|
120,756 |
|
Common |
|
|
41,049 |
|
|
|
379,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
161,805 |
|
|
|
499,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock: $100 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.01 par value; 875,000,000 shares authorized,
313,765,893 shares issued as of March 31, 2009 and 270,353,677
shares issued as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,790,786 |
|
|
|
3,454,903 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
(1,884,668 |
) |
|
|
(1,488,586 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(65,243 |
) |
|
|
(56,128 |
) |
Less common stock in treasury, at cost, 1,449,939 shares
as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(76,752 |
) |
|
|
(76,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,767,261 |
|
|
|
1,836,141 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate affiliates |
|
|
23,894 |
|
|
|
24,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,791,155 |
|
|
|
1,860,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
28,903,412 |
|
|
$ |
29,557,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
except for per share amounts) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
499,107 |
|
|
$ |
524,942 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
233,019 |
|
|
|
231,632 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
13,518 |
|
Land sales |
|
|
8,986 |
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
19,198 |
|
|
|
20,239 |
|
Other |
|
|
18,305 |
|
|
|
30,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
788,640 |
|
|
|
830,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
71,558 |
|
|
|
68,649 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
55,356 |
|
|
|
62,100 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
7,576 |
|
|
|
12,276 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
103,701 |
|
|
|
111,520 |
|
Land sales operations |
|
|
10,614 |
|
|
|
9,921 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
10,332 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
Property management and other costs |
|
|
43,408 |
|
|
|
52,138 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
45,825 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
Provisions for impairment |
|
|
331,093 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
204,615 |
|
|
|
184,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
884,078 |
|
|
|
512,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(95,438 |
) |
|
|
318,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(328,489 |
) |
|
|
(325,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes, noncontrolling interests
and equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
(423,197 |
) |
|
|
(6,855 |
) |
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes |
|
|
11,514 |
|
|
|
(9,392 |
) |
Equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
23,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(404,145 |
) |
|
|
7,581 |
|
Discontinued operations loss on dispositions |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(404,200 |
) |
|
|
7,581 |
|
Allocation to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
8,118 |
|
|
|
(4,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(396,082 |
) |
|
$ |
3,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income, Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(404,200 |
) |
|
$ |
7,581 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on financial instruments |
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
(1,687 |
) |
Accrued pension adjustment |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(2,282 |
) |
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(4,176 |
) |
Comprehensive loss allocated to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(9,065 |
) |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income, net attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(413,315 |
) |
|
$ |
4,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Consolidated Real |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Estate Affiliates |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
$ |
2,601,296 |
|
|
$ |
(1,087,080 |
) |
|
$ |
35,658 |
|
|
$ |
(95,635 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,456,696 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,756,689 |
) |
|
|
(14,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,457 |
|
|
|
(1,763,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted balance January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
844,607 |
|
|
|
(1,101,392 |
) |
|
|
35,658 |
|
|
|
(95,635 |
) |
|
|
7,457 |
|
|
|
(306,848 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
Cash distributions declared ($.50 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,949 |
) |
Contributions to (distributions from) noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
Conversion of operating partnership
units to common stock
(18,495 common shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
Issuance of common stock
(20,327,210 common shares and 50 treasury
shares) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
731,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731,556 |
|
Shares issued pursuant to CSA
(356,661 treasury shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(914 |
) |
|
|
(2,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,534 |
|
Restricted stock grant, net of
compensation expense
(351,232 common shares) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,987 |
) |
Adjustment for noncontrolling interest in
operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,565 |
) |
Adjust noncontrolling interest in OP Units to
fair value per SFAS 160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,664 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,263 |
|
|
$ |
(1,222,413 |
) |
|
$ |
32,671 |
|
|
$ |
(76,752 |
) |
|
$ |
10,871 |
|
|
$ |
469,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2008 (as previously reported) |
|
$ |
2,704 |
|
|
$ |
3,337,657 |
|
|
$ |
(1,452,733 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,128 |
) |
|
$ |
(76,752 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,754,748 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,246 |
|
|
|
(35,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,266 |
|
|
|
105,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
balance, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
3,454,903 |
|
|
|
(1,488,586 |
) |
|
|
(56,128 |
) |
|
|
(76,752 |
) |
|
|
24,266 |
|
|
|
1,860,407 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
(395,423 |
) |
Contributions to (distributions from) noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
Conversion of operating partnership
units to common stock
(43,408,053 common shares) |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
324,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,488 |
|
Issuance of common stock
(69 common shares) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Restricted stock grant forfeitures,
net of compensation expense
(65 common shares forfeited) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
Adjustment for noncontrolling interest in
operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,138 |
|
|
$ |
3,790,786 |
|
|
$ |
(1,884,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,243 |
) |
|
$ |
(76,752 |
) |
|
$ |
23,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,791,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(404,200 |
) |
|
$ |
7,581 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
(7,538 |
) |
|
|
(23,828 |
) |
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
10,332 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
Distributions received from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
10,711 |
|
|
|
9,777 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
190,622 |
|
|
|
172,302 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
13,993 |
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
Amortization of deferred finance costs and debt market rate adjustments |
|
|
18,069 |
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
Non-cash interest expense on Exchangeable Senior Notes |
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
6,298 |
|
Non-cash interest expense resulting from termination of interest rate swaps |
|
|
(8,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provisions for impairment |
|
|
331,093 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Participation expense pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Land/residential development and acquisitions expenditures |
|
|
(17,251 |
) |
|
|
(53,613 |
) |
Cost of land sales |
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
Straight-line rent amortization |
|
|
(8,636 |
) |
|
|
(11,942 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles other than in-place leases |
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
(3,462 |
) |
Glendale Matter deposit |
|
|
67,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(2,345 |
) |
|
|
20,659 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(8,592 |
) |
|
|
(10,329 |
) |
Deferred expenses |
|
|
(11,865 |
) |
|
|
(14,634 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(11,846 |
) |
|
|
29,418 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(12,160 |
) |
|
|
(10,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
159,537 |
|
|
|
138,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/development of real estate and property additions/improvements |
|
|
(79,596 |
) |
|
|
(553,029 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of investment properties |
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
|
17,166 |
|
Increase in investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
(21,209 |
) |
|
|
(33,947 |
) |
Distributions received from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates in excess of income |
|
|
24,799 |
|
|
|
11,089 |
|
Loans from (to) Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, net |
|
|
(6,621 |
) |
|
|
64,385 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
9,723 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(73,839 |
) |
|
|
(482,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010,000 |
|
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
|
(57,996 |
) |
|
|
(1,176,336 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
(6,798 |
) |
Cash distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,950 |
) |
Cash distributions paid to holders of Common Units |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(26,016 |
) |
Cash distributions paid to holders of perpetual and convertible preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,903 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, including from common stock plans |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
821,630 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(58,946 |
) |
|
|
500,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
26,752 |
|
|
|
156,928 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
168,993 |
|
|
|
99,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
195,745 |
|
|
$ |
256,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
263,934 |
|
|
$ |
307,762 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
15,497 |
|
|
|
16,320 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
6,485 |
|
|
|
21,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in exchange for Operating Partnership Units |
|
$ |
324,488 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
Common stock issued pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,534 |
|
Change in accrued capital expenditures included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(42,778 |
) |
|
|
46,221 |
|
Change in accrued purchase price of The Shoppes at The Palazzo |
|
|
(120,216 |
) |
|
|
200,288 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION
Readers of this Quarterly Report should refer to the Companys (as defined below) audited
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 which are included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual Report) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 (Commission File No. 1-11656), as certain footnote disclosures which would substantially
duplicate those contained in our Annual Report have been omitted from this report. Capitalized
terms used, but not defined, in this Quarterly Report have the same meanings as in our Annual
Report.
General
General Growth Properties, Inc. (GGP), a Delaware corporation, is a self-administered and
self-managed real estate investment trust, referred to as a REIT which, as described in
Liquidity below, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States
Code (Chapter 11) in the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy
Court) on April 16, 2009. GGP was organized in 1986 and through its subsidiaries and affiliates
owns, operates, manages and develops retail and other rental properties, primarily shopping
centers, which are located primarily throughout the United States. GGP also holds assets through
its international Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates in Brazil, Turkey and Costa Rica in which
GGP has a net investment of $159.5 million at March 31, 2009 and $166.7 million at December 31,
2008. Additionally, GGP develops and sells land for residential, commercial and other uses
primarily in large-scale, long-term master planned community projects in and around Columbia,
Maryland; Summerlin, Nevada; and Houston, Texas, as well as one residential condominium project
located in Natick (Boston), Massachusetts. Substantially all of our business is conducted by our operating partnership, GGP Limited Partnership (GGPLP or the Operating Partnership), in which, at March 31, 2009, GGP holds approximately a 98% ownership
interest. In these notes, the terms we, us and our refer to GGP and its subsidiaries (the
Company).
In this report, we refer to our ownership interests in majority-owned or controlled properties as
Consolidated Properties, to joint ventures in which we own a noncontrolling interest as
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates and the properties owned by such joint ventures as the
Unconsolidated Properties. Our Company Portfolio includes both our Consolidated Properties and
our Unconsolidated Properties.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GGP, our subsidiaries
and joint ventures in which we have a controlling interest. For consolidated joint ventures, the
noncontrolling partners share of operations (generally computed as the joint venture partners
ownership percentage) is included in Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Real Estate
Affiliates as permanent equity of the Company. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows
for the interim periods have been included. The results for the interim periods ended March 31,
2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal year.
Liquidity
As of March 31, 2009, we had $195.7 million of cash on hand, we had $2.01 billion in past due debt,
and an additional $4.09 billion of debt that could be accelerated by our lenders. As we were unable
to reach an out-of-court consensus with our lenders concerning such past due and potentially
accelerated debt, on April 16, 2009 (the Petition Date), the Company, the Operating Partnership
and certain of the Companys domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. On April 22, 2009, certain additional domestic subsidiaries (collectively with the
subsidiaries filing on April 16, 2009, the Company and the Operating Partnership, the Debtors) of
the Company also filed voluntary petitions for relief in the Bankruptcy Court (collectively, the
Chapter 11 Cases) which the Bankruptcy Court has ruled may be jointly administered. However,
neither GGMI, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, nor any of our joint ventures, either
consolidated or unconsolidated, have sought such protection.
Collectively, the Debtors own and operate approximately 166 regional shopping centers and the
Debtors intend to work with their constituencies to emerge from bankruptcy as quickly as possible
while executing on a plan of
reorganization that extends mortgage maturities, reduces corporate debt and overall leverage and
that preserves
7
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
GGPs integrated, national business operations. Pursuant to Chapter 11, a debtor is
afforded certain protection against its creditors and creditors are prohibited from taking certain
actions (such as pursuing collection efforts or proceeding to foreclose on secured obligations)
related to debts that were owed prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.
The Debtors are currently operating as debtors in possession under the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the orders of the Bankruptcy
Court. On April 17, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court granted a variety of first day motions that will
allow the Company, on an interim basis, to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course
without interruption, and covering, among other things, employee obligations, critical service
providers, tax matters, insurance matters, tenant obligations, cash management and cash collateral.
The Debtors have retained, subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, legal and financial professionals
to advise the Debtors on the bankruptcy proceedings and certain other ordinary course
professionals. From time to time, the Debtors may seek Bankruptcy Court approval for the retention
of additional professionals. A hearing on a number of these matters will take place on May 8,
2009.
The following is a list of loans with past due maturity dates, as of May 7, 2009, where collection
and foreclosure proceedings have been stayed by the Chapter 11 petitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original or Extended |
|
|
Amount Due |
|
Loan/Property |
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
As of March 31, 2009* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Short-term Secured Loan |
|
|
2/01/09 |
|
|
$ |
220,500 |
|
Oakwood Center |
|
|
2/09/09 |
|
|
|
94,821 |
|
Chico Mall |
|
|
2/11/09 |
|
|
|
57,203 |
|
Fashion Show |
|
|
2/12/09 |
|
|
|
648,219 |
|
The Shoppes at The Palazzo |
|
|
2/12/09 |
|
|
|
249,623 |
|
Deerbrook |
|
|
3/02/09 |
|
|
|
73,964 |
|
Jordan Creek |
|
|
3/02/09 |
|
|
|
185,950 |
|
Southland |
|
|
3/02/09 |
|
|
|
81,477 |
|
TRCLP Unsecured Bonds |
|
|
3/16/09 |
|
|
|
395,000 |
|
Prince Kuhio |
|
|
4/01/09 |
|
|
|
37,826 |
|
JP Realty Secured Notes |
|
|
4/09/09 |
|
|
|
33,196 |
|
Town East |
|
|
4/13/09 |
|
|
|
105,391 |
|
TRCLP Unsecured Bonds |
|
|
4/30/09 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
The Grand Canal Shoppes |
|
|
5/01/09 |
|
|
|
394,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,777,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes principal payments through March 31, 2009. |
In addition to the debt defaults discussed above, the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases
triggered defaults on substantially all debt obligations of the Debtors. However, under section
362 of Chapter 11, the filing of a bankruptcy petition automatically stays most actions
against the debtors estate. Absent an order of the Court, these prepetition
liabilities are subject to settlement under a plan of reorganization.
With respect to certain of these loans, short-term extension or forebearance agreements were
obtained, all of which have expired. For example, the aggregate of $900 million mortgage loans
secured by our Fashion Show and The Shoppes at The Palazzo shopping centers (the Fashion
Show/Palazzo Loans) matured on November 28, 2008. As we were unable to extend, repay or refinance
these loans, on December 16, 2008, we entered into forbearance and waiver agreements with respect
to the Fashion Show/Palazzo loan agreements, which expired on February 12, 2009. As a result of the
non-payment of the Fashion Show/Palazzo Loans, the maturity date of each of the 2006 Credit
Facility ($2.58 billion) and the Secured Portfolio Facility ($1.51 billion) could be accelerated by
our lenders. Accordingly, we entered into forbearance agreements in December 2008 relating to each
of the 2006 Credit Facility and Secured Portfolio Facility. Each of these forbearance agreements
expired on March 15, 2009.
Certain groups of unsecured bonds issued by TRCLP matured on March 16, 2009 ($395.0 million), and
April 30, 2009 ($200.0 million). Failure to pay these bonds at maturity constituted a default
under these and other unsecured bonds issued by TRCLP having an aggregate outstanding balance of
$2.25 billion as of March 31, 2009. In March 2009, we undertook a consent solicitation of the
bondholders for the entire $2.25 billion of TRCLP bonds, seeking their consent to forebear from
exercising their remedies with respect to certain payment
8
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
and other defaults under the bonds
through December 31, 2009. Although a significant number of consents were
obtained, the desired thresholds were not obtained and the legal entities obligated by such bonds
were included in our Chapter 11 Cases.
In addition to our
mortgage and other debt, current liabilities and liens, we are subject to
certain executory contracts. The Debtors, subject to the approval of
the Bankruptcy Court, may assume or reject these contracts. Although we are considering
the rejection of certain of such contracts, (except for our operating
property tenant leases), none have been rejected as of this time. Claims may
result if an executory contract is rejected, however, no such potential claims have been recorded or
reflected at this time.
As described above, we have received legal protection from our creditors pursuant to the Chapter 11
Cases. This protection is limited in duration and we will be proceeding to negotiate a
reorganization plan, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, with our lenders, other
creditors, and other stakeholders. There can be no assurance that such negotiations will yield
sufficient reductions or deferrals of our current and future debt maturities to allow us to
continue operations. Professional service costs with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases and our
examination of financial and strategic alternatives have been expensed and are included as general
and administrative expense in our consolidated financial statements.
In periods subsequent to our
bankruptcy filing, such costs will be separately reported as restructuring costs.
Our potential inability to address our past due and future debt maturities raises substantial
doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, our
consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments related to the recoverability of
assets and satisfaction of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a
going concern.
Reclassifications and Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
Certain amounts in the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to
the current period presentation. In addition, as of January 1, 2009 we adopted the following two
accounting pronouncements that required retrospective application, in which all periods presented
reflect the necessary changes.
As of January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (including Partial Cash Settlement)
(FSP 14-1) which required us to separately account for the liability and equity components of our
Exchangeable Senior Notes (Note 4) in a manner that reflects the nonconvertible debt borrowing rate
when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The impact of the required retrospective
application of FSP 14-1 on our consolidated financial statements is that the Exchangeable Senior
Notes have been reflected as originally being issued at a discount, with such discount being
reflected in subsequent periods as a non-cash increase in interest expense. Below is a summary of
the effects of the retrospective application of FSP 14-1 on the
consolidated financial statements and the Exchangeable Senior Notes, see Note 4 for more
disclosures regarding the maturity date and conversion price for the Exchangeable Senior Notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously Reported |
|
Impact of |
|
Current Presentation |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
FSP 14-1 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Balance Sheet |
|
(In thousands) |
Mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
24,853,313 |
|
|
$ |
(96,736 |
) |
|
$ |
24,756,577 |
|
|
|
|
As Previously Reported |
|
Impact of |
|
Current Presentation |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
FSP 14-1 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Income Statement |
|
(In thousands) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
319,394 |
|
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
$ |
325,692 |
|
Allocation
to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
5,321 |
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
4,221 |
|
Net income
attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
8,558 |
|
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
9
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of liability |
|
$ |
1,550,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,550,000 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(90,044 |
) |
|
|
(96,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount of liability component |
|
$ |
1,459,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,453,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount of equity component |
|
$ |
139,882 |
|
|
$ |
139,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income Statement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
|
$ |
15,423 |
|
|
$ |
15,423 |
|
Discount amortization FSP14-1
implementation |
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest |
|
$ |
22,115 |
|
|
$ |
21,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate |
|
|
5.71 |
% |
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements (SFAS 160) which changed the reporting for minority interests in our consolidated
joint ventures by re-characterizing them as noncontrolling interests and re-classifying such
minority interests as a component of permanent equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
minority interests related to our common and preferred operating
partnership units have been
re-characterized as redeemable noncontrolling interests and will remain as temporary equity at a
mezzanine level per EITF Topic No. D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities
(Topic D-98), in our Consolidated Balance Sheets presented at the greater of the carrying amount
adjusted for the noncontrolling interests share of the allocation of income or loss (and its share
of other comprehensive income or loss) and dividends or the fair value as of each measurement date
subsequent to the measurement date. Changes in fair value from period to period are charged
to Additional paid-in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. SFAS 160 also changed the
presentation of the income allocated to minority interests by re-characterizing it as allocations to
noncontrolling interests and re-classifying such income as an adjustment to net income to arrive at net
income attributable to common stockholders.
Noncontrolling Interests
The holders of the Common Units share equally with our common stockholders on a per share basis in
any distributions by the Operating Partnership on the basis that one Common Unit is equivalent to
one share of GGP common stock. Under certain circumstances, the Common Units (other than Common
Units held by the parties to the Rights Agreement dated July 27, 1993, as described below) can be
redeemed at the option of the holders for cash or, at our election, shares of GGP common stock on a
one-for-one basis. Upon receipt of a request for redemption by a holder of such Common Units, the
Company, as general partner of the Operating Partnership, has the option to pay the redemption
price for such Common Units with shares of common stock of the Company (subject to certain
conditions), or in cash, on a one-for-one basis with a cash redemption price equivalent to the
market price of one share of common stock of the Company at the time of redemption. Parties to the
Rights Agreement dated July 27, 1993 have the right to redeem the Common Units covered by such
agreement for shares of GGP Common Stock on a one-for-one basis until they and certain affiliates
own 25% of the outstanding shares of GGP Common Stock, at which point such parties have the right
to require the Company to purchase any additional Common Units subject to the agreement for shares
of GGP Common Stock or cash, at the Companys election and subject to certain limitations. All
prior requests for redemption of Common Units have been fulfilled with shares of the Companys
common stock. Notwithstanding this historical practice, the aggregate amount of cash that would
have been paid to the holders of the outstanding Common Units as of March 31, 2009 if such holders
had requested redemption of the Common Units as of March 31, 2009, and all such Common Units were
redeemed (or purchased in the case of the Rights Agreement) for cash, would have been $5.2 million.
We may not have the liquidity or requisite Bankruptcy Court approvals necessary to redeem Common
Units for cash. As of March 31, 2009, the redeemable noncontrolling interests
10
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
are presented in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets at carrying value because the carrying value of the units was greater
than the conversion value of the units based on the stock price at March 31, 2009. The following
table reflects the activity of the redeemable noncontrolling interests for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at
December 31, 2007 (as adjusted) |
|
$ |
2,358,901 |
|
Net income |
|
|
3,615 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
(28,808 |
) |
Conversion
of operating partnership units into common shares |
|
|
(706 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
102,565 |
|
Adjust
redeemable noncontrolling interests to fair value per SFAS 160 |
|
|
(248,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,186,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 (as adjusted) |
|
$ |
499,925 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(8,777 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
(2,336 |
) |
Conversion
of operating partnership units into common shares |
|
|
(324,488 |
) |
Other
comprehensive income |
|
|
9,064 |
|
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
(11,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
161,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
On January 2, 2009, MB Capital Units LLC, pursuant to the Rights Agreement, converted 42,350,000
Common Units (approximately 13% of all outstanding Common Units, including those owned by GGP) held
in the Companys Operating Partnership into 42,350,000 shares of GGP common stock.
The
Operating Partnership has also issued Convertible Preferred Units,
which are convertible, with certain restrictions, at any time by the
holder into Common Units of the Operating Partnership at the
following rates (subject to adjustment):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Common Units |
|
|
for each |
|
|
Preferred Unit |
Series B |
|
|
3.000 |
|
Series D |
|
|
1.508 |
|
Series E |
|
|
1.298 |
|
Impairment
Operating properties and properties under development
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-lived Assets, (SFAS 144) requires that if impairment indicators exist and the undiscounted
cash flows expected to be generated by an asset are less than its carrying amount, an impairment
charge should be recorded to write down the carrying amount of such asset to its fair value. We
review our real estate assets, including investment land, land held for development and sale and
developments in progress, for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The cash flow estimates used
both for estimating fair value and the recoverability analysis are inherently judgmental and
reflect current and projected trends in rental, occupancy and capitalization rates, and our
estimated holding periods for the applicable assets. Impairment indicators for our retail and other
segment are assessed separately for each property and include, but are not limited to, significant
decreases in real estate property net operating income and occupancy percentages. Impairment
indicators for our Master Planned Communities segment are assessed separately for each community
and include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in sales pace or average selling prices,
significant increases in expected land development
11
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
and construction costs or cancellation rates,
and projected losses on expected future sales. Impairment indicators for pre-development costs,
which are typically costs incurred during the beginning stages of a potential development, and
developments in progress are assessed by project and include, but are not limited to, significant
changes in projected completion dates, revenues or cash flows, development costs, market factors
and sustainability of development projects. If an indicator of potential impairment exists, the
asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying value to the estimated future
undiscounted cash flow. Although the estimated value of certain assets may be exceeded by the
carrying amount, a real estate asset is only considered to be impaired when its carrying value
cannot be recovered through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent an impairment
provision is necessary, the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value
is expensed.
We recorded impairment charges of $81.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related
to our River Falls Mall located in Clarksville, Indiana, which was calculated using a discounted
cash flow analysis (at a 10.75% discount rate) incorporating available market information and other
management assumptions including estimates of future cash flows based on a number of factors such
as historical operating results, known trends and market and economic conditions. We recorded
impairment charges of $40.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to our Owings
Mills Mall located in Owings Mills, Maryland, which was calculated using a discounted cash flow
analysis (at a 9.25% discount rate) incorporating available market information and other management
assumptions including estimates of future cash flows based on a number of factors such as
historical operating results, known trends and market/economic conditions.
The continuing deterioration of the economy in general and our financial condition specifically has
led to further tests for impairment indicators of prospective redevelopment and development
projects. Accordingly, we recorded impairment charges of $16.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 related to the write down
of various pre-development costs that were determined to be non-recoverable due to the related
projects being terminated. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized
impairment charges of $24.2 million for our development project
in Allen, Texas, which was calculated using a projected sales price analysis related to an existing
pending sales contract, and $6.7 million related to our development project in Redlands,
California, which was calculated using a projected sales price analysis, incorporating available
market information including comparable sales.
We recorded an impairment charge of $52.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related
to our Fairwood master planned community, which was calculated using a projected sales price
analysis related to an existing pending sales contract for a large bulk sale of lots anticipated to
close in the third quarter of 2009.
All of these impairment charges are included in provisions for impairment in our consolidated
financial statements.
No other impairments of our investment in real estate were recorded for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Investment in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
Per Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock, a series of operating losses of an investee or other factors may
indicate that a decrease in value of our investment in the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
has occurred which is other-than-temporary. The investment in each of the Unconsolidated Real
Estate Affiliates is evaluated for recoverability and valuation declines that are other than
temporary periodically and as deemed necessary. Accordingly, in addition to the property-specific
impairment analysis that we perform on the investment properties owned by such joint ventures (as
part of our investment property impairment process described above), we also considered the
ownership and distribution preferences and limitations and rights to sell and repurchase of our
ownership interests. Based on such evaluations, no provisions for impairment of our investments in
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates were recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008.
Goodwill
The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets
acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill has been recognized and allocated to specific properties in our Retail and Other Segment
since each individual rental property or each operating property is an operating segment and
considered a reporting unit. Statement of Financial Accounting
12
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), states that goodwill should be tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. As of March 31, 2009, we performed an interim impairment test of goodwill as changes in
current market and economic conditions during the first quarter of 2009 indicated an impairment of
the asset might have occurred. We perform this test by first comparing the estimated fair value of
each property with our book value of the property, including, if applicable, its allocated portion
of aggregate goodwill. We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize
appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future
cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known
trends, and market/economic conditions. If the book value of a property, including its goodwill,
exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to
measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In this second step, if the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than the book value of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded. Based on our
testing methodology, we recorded provisions for impairment related to the allocated goodwill of
$109.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This impairment was primarily driven by
the increases in capitalization rate assumptions in the first quarter 2009 and reduced estimates of
NOI, primarily due to the continued downturn in the real estate market. No impairments of goodwill
were recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
General
We can provide no assurance that material impairment charges with respect to operating properties,
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, construction in progress, property held for development and
sale or goodwill will not occur in future periods. Our tests for impairment at March 31, 2009 were
based on the most current information available to us. If the conditions mentioned above
deteriorate, or if our plans regarding our assets change, particularly due to our Chapter 11 Cases,
subsequent tests for impairment could result in additional impairment charges in the future.
Furthermore, certain of our properties had fair values less than their carrying amounts. However,
based on the Companys plans with respect to those properties, we believe that the carrying amounts
are recoverable and therefore, under applicable GAAP guidance, no additional impairments
were taken. Accordingly, we will continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to
determine whether additional impairments are warranted.
Fair Value Measurements
We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) as of January 1, 2008 for our
financial assets and liabilities and such adoption did not change our valuation methods for such
assets and liabilities. This adoption applies primarily to our derivative financial instruments,
which are assets and liabilities carried at fair value (primarily based on unobservable market
data) on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements. We have investments in
marketable securities that are immaterial to our consolidated financial statements. In addition,
we adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2009 for our non-financial assets and liabilities, which only
impacted the assets measured at fair value due to impairments incurred since adoption.
The following table summarizes our liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Measurement |
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (1) |
|
$ |
14,580,834 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,580,834 |
|
Interest Rate Caps (1) |
|
|
2,406,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,986,873 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,986,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) is one component in the overall valuation of derivative
instruments. The CVA is calculated using credit spreads that are generally unobservable in the
market place (Level 3 inputs). The CVA was deemed to be a significant component of the
valuation, therefore the entire balance of the derivative is classified as Level 3. |
13
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
Interest Rate Caps |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
27,714,675 |
|
|
$ |
2,507,693 |
|
|
$ |
30,222,368 |
|
Included in other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,654 |
) |
|
|
(101,654 |
) |
Included in earnings (1) |
|
|
(13,133,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,133,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,580,834 |
|
|
$ |
2,406,039 |
|
|
$ |
16,986,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See discussion of termination of interest rate swaps below under Derivative Financial
Instruments. |
The following table summarizes our assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
Active Markets |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement |
|
for Identical |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
Total Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in real
estate: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen, TX development |
|
$ |
29,511 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,511 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(24,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fairwood MPC |
|
|
12,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Owings Mills Mall |
|
|
38,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,068 |
|
|
|
(40,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redlands, CA development |
|
|
6,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,727 |
|
|
|
(6,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
River Falls Mall |
|
|
22,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,003 |
|
|
|
(81,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,938 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,140 |
|
|
$ |
66,798 |
|
|
$ |
(205,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See discussion of unobservable inputs in the impairment
analysis above under Impairment. |
Derivative Financial Instruments
As of January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS 161) which requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and
strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and
losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in
derivative instruments.
We use derivative financial instruments to reduce risk associated with movement in interest rates.
We may choose or be required by lenders to reduce cash flow and earnings volatility associated with
interest rate risk exposure on variable-rate borrowings and/or forecasted fixed-rate borrowings by
entering into interest rate swaps or interest rate caps. We do not use derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes.
As of March 31, 2009, our interest rate swaps no longer qualify as highly effective and therefore
no longer qualify for hedge accounting treatment as the Company made the decision not to pay
future settlement payments under such swaps. As a result, all changes in fair value (accruals, net
settlements, changes in value) for these
non-designated/mark-to-market hedges are included in interest expense in our consolidated financial
statements, which for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was a reduction in interest expense of
$13.1 million. As the interest payments on the hedged debt remain probable, the net balance in the
gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income of $(27.7) million that existed as of
December 31, 2008 remains in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and is amortized to
interest expense as the hedged forecasted transactions impact earnings or are deemed probable not
to occur. The amortization of the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 was $4.5 million of additional interest expense.
Under interest rate cap agreements, we make initial premium payments to the counterparties in
exchange for the right to receive payments from them if interest rates exceed specified levels
during the agreement period. Notional principal amounts are used to express the volume of these
transactions, but the cash requirements and amounts subject to credit risk are substantially less.
As of March 31, 2009, we had three outstanding interest rate cap derivatives that were designated
as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk with a notional value $1.13 billion.
Parties to interest rate exchange agreements are subject to market risk for changes in interest
rates and risk of credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. We do not
require any collateral under these agreements, but deal only with well known financial institution
counterparties (which, in certain cases, are also the lenders on the related debt) and expect that
all counterparties will meet their obligations.
14
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
The interest rate cap derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value while changes in
the fair value of the receivable or payable under interest rate cap agreements are accounted for as
adjustments to interest expense on the related debt. We have not recognized any losses as a result
of hedge discontinuance and the expense that we recognized related to changes in the time value of
interest rate cap agreements were insignificant for 2009 and 2008.
Revenue Recognition and Related Matters
Minimum rent revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases.
Minimum rent revenues also include amounts collected from tenants to allow the termination of their
leases prior to their scheduled termination dates and accretion related to above and below-market
tenant leases on acquired properties. Termination income recognized was $7.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Net
accretion related to above and below-market tenant leases was $0.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and $5.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Straight-line rent receivables, which represent the current net cumulative rents recognized prior
to when billed and collectible as provided by the terms of the leases, of $236.8 million as of
March 31, 2009 and $228.1 million as of December 31, 2008, are included in Accounts and notes
receivable, net in our consolidated financial statements.
Percentage rent in lieu of fixed minimum rent received from tenants was $11.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and $11.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and is
included in Minimum rents in our consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, significant estimates
and assumptions have been made with respect to useful lives of assets, capitalization of
development and leasing costs, provision for income taxes, recoverable amounts of receivables and
deferred taxes, initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and
intangibles, particularly with respect to acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets and
goodwill, and cost ratios and completion percentages used for land sales. Actual results could
differ from these and other estimates.
The Glendale Matter
On December 19, 2008, the defendants (GGP and GGP/Homart II, LLC) agreed to terms of a settlement
and mutual release agreement with respect to the Glendale Matter which released the defendants from
all past, present and future claims in exchange for a settlement payment of $48.0 million, which
was paid from the appellate bond cash collateral account in January 2009. Concurrently, GGP agreed
with its joint venture partner in GGP/Homart II, LLC, New York State Common Retirement Fund
(NYSCRF), that GGP would not be reimbursed for any portion of this payment, and we would
reimburse $5.5 million of costs to NYSCRF in connection with the settlement. Accordingly, as of
December 2008, the Company adjusted its liability for the Judgment Amount from $89.4 million to
$48.0 million and reversed legal fees incurred by GGP/Homart II of $14.2 million that were
previously recorded at 100% by GGP and post-judgment related interest expense of $7.0 million. The
net impact of these items related to the settlement was a credit of $57.1 million reflected in
litigation recovery in our Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Also as a result of the settlement, the Company reflected its 50% share of
legal costs that had previously been recorded at 100% as $7.1 million of additional expense
reflected in Equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates in our Consolidated
Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
15
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Information related to our EPS calculations is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Numerators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(404,145 |
) |
|
|
(404,145 |
) |
|
$ |
7,581 |
|
|
$ |
7,581 |
|
Discontinued
operations loss on dispositions |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(404,200 |
) |
|
|
(404,200 |
) |
|
|
7,581 |
|
|
|
7,581 |
|
Allocation to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
8,118 |
|
|
|
8,118 |
|
|
|
(4,221 |
) |
|
|
(4,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(396,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(396,082 |
) |
|
$ |
3,360 |
|
|
$ |
3,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
310,868 |
|
|
|
310,868 |
|
|
|
244,765 |
|
|
|
244,765 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding diluted |
|
|
310,868 |
|
|
|
310,868 |
|
|
|
244,765 |
|
|
|
244,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS excludes options where the exercise price was higher than the average market price of
our common stock, and therefore would have an anti-dilutive effect, and options for which vesting
requirements were not satisfied. Such options totaled 4,966,829 shares as of March 31, 2009, and
4,772,065 shares as of March 31, 2008. Outstanding Common Units have also been excluded from the
diluted earnings per share calculation because including such Common Units would also require that
the share of GGPLP income attributable to such Common Units be added back to net income therefore
resulting in no effect on EPS. Finally, the affect of the exchange feature of the exchangeable
senior notes that were issued in April 2007 (Note 4) are also excluded from EPS because the
conditions for exchange were not satisfied as of March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Transactions With Affiliates
Management and other fees primarily represent management and leasing fees, development fees,
financing fees and fees for other ancillary services performed for the benefit of certain of the
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates and for properties owned by third parties. Fees earned from
the Unconsolidated Properties totaled $16.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
$19.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Such fees are recognized as revenue when
earned.
16
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTE 2 INTANGIBLES ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The following table summarizes our intangible assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Gross Asset |
|
(Amortization)/ |
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Accretion |
|
Amount |
|
|
(In thousands) |
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-place value |
|
$ |
622,840 |
|
|
$ |
(375,650 |
) |
|
$ |
247,190 |
|
Above-market |
|
|
112,891 |
|
|
|
(67,025 |
) |
|
|
45,866 |
|
Below-market |
|
|
(198,931 |
) |
|
|
116,471 |
|
|
|
(82,460 |
) |
Ground leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above-market |
|
|
(16,968 |
) |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
(14,899 |
) |
Below-market |
|
|
271,602 |
|
|
|
(25,518 |
) |
|
|
246,084 |
|
Real estate tax
stabilization
agreement |
|
|
91,879 |
|
|
|
(17,329 |
) |
|
|
74,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-place value |
|
$ |
637,791 |
|
|
$ |
(381,027 |
) |
|
$ |
256,764 |
|
Above-market |
|
|
117,239 |
|
|
|
(65,931 |
) |
|
|
51,308 |
|
Below-market |
|
|
(199,406 |
) |
|
|
110,650 |
|
|
|
(88,756 |
) |
Ground leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above-market |
|
|
(16,968 |
) |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
(15,017 |
) |
Below-market |
|
|
271,602 |
|
|
|
(24,049 |
) |
|
|
247,553 |
|
Real estate tax
stabilization
agreement |
|
|
91,879 |
|
|
|
(16,348 |
) |
|
|
75,531 |
|
The gross asset balances of the in-place value of tenant leases are included in Buildings and
equipment in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The above-market and below-market tenant and ground
leases are included in Prepaid expenses and other assets and Accounts payable and accrued expenses
(Note 7) in our consolidated financial statements.
Amortization/accretion of these intangible assets and liabilities, and similar assets and
liabilities from our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates at our share, decreased our income
(excluding the impact of noncontrolling interests and the provision for income taxes) by $14.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $17.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
Future amortization, including our share of such items from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates,
is estimated to decrease income (excluding the impact of noncontrolling interests and the provision
for income taxes) by approximately $65.7 million in 2009, $58.1 million in 2010, $47.7 million in
2011, $38.9 million in 2012 and $31.7 million in 2013.
NOTE 3 UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES
The Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates include our noncontrolling investments in real estate
joint ventures. Generally, we share in the profits and losses, cash flows and other matters
relating to our investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates in accordance with our
respective ownership percentages. We manage most of the properties owned by these joint ventures.
As we have joint interest and control of these ventures
with our venture partners and they have substantive participating rights in such ventures, we
account for these joint ventures using the equity method. Some of the joint ventures have elected
to be taxed as REITs.
In certain circumstances, we have debt obligations in excess of our pro rata share of the debt of
our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates (Retained Debt). This Retained Debt represents
distributed debt proceeds of the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates in excess of our pro rata
share of the non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of such Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates. The
proceeds of the Retained Debt which are distributed to us are included as a reduction in our
investment in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates. In the event that the Unconsolidated Real
Estate Affiliates do not generate sufficient cash flow to pay debt service,
17
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
by agreement with our
partners, our distributions may be reduced or we may be required to contribute funds in an amount
equal to the debt service on Retained Debt. Such Retained Debt
totaled $160.1 million as of March
31, 2009 and $160.8 million as of December 31, 2008, and has been reflected as a reduction in our
investment in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates. In certain other circumstances, the Company,
in connection with the debt obligations of certain Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, has
agreed to provide supplemental guarantees or master-lease commitments to provide to the debt
holders additional credit-enhancement or security. As of March 31,
2009, we did not expect to be required to
perform pursuant to any of such supplemental credit-enhancement provisions for our Unconsolidated
Real Estate Affiliates.
Generally, we anticipate that the 2009 operations of our joint venture properties will support the
operational cash needs of the properties, including debt service payments. However, based on the
liquidity concerns (Note 1) of the Company, there can be no assurance that we will have the ability
to fully fund the capital requirements of all of our joint ventures if the needs arise.
The significant accounting policies used by the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates are the same
as ours.
18
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
Condensed Combined Financial Information of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
Following is summarized financial information for our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
867,121 |
|
|
$ |
863,965 |
|
Buildings and equipment |
|
|
7,630,463 |
|
|
|
7,558,344 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,580,746 |
) |
|
|
(1,524,121 |
) |
Developments in progress |
|
|
527,916 |
|
|
|
549,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
7,444,754 |
|
|
|
7,447,907 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
261,834 |
|
|
|
241,786 |
|
Investment property and property held for development and sale |
|
|
284,893 |
|
|
|
282,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
|
7,991,481 |
|
|
|
7,972,329 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
251,918 |
|
|
|
231,500 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
151,009 |
|
|
|
163,749 |
|
Deferred expenses, net |
|
|
172,996 |
|
|
|
173,213 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
229,985 |
|
|
|
225,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,797,389 |
|
|
$ |
8,766,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Owners Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
6,468,809 |
|
|
$ |
6,411,631 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
474,492 |
|
|
|
513,538 |
|
Owners equity |
|
|
1,854,088 |
|
|
|
1,841,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
8,797,389 |
|
|
$ |
8,766,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment In and Loans To/From Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners equity |
|
$ |
1,854,088 |
|
|
$ |
1,841,431 |
|
Less joint venture partners equity |
|
|
(926,200 |
) |
|
|
(915,690 |
) |
Capital or basis differences and loans |
|
|
904,543 |
|
|
|
911,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and loans to/from
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, net |
|
$ |
1,832,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation Investment In and Loans To/From Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Investment in and loans to/from
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
$ |
1,864,353 |
|
|
$ |
1,869,929 |
|
Liability Investment in and loans to/from
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
(31,922 |
) |
|
|
(32,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and loans to/from
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, net |
|
$ |
1,832,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Condensed Combined Statements of Income -
Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
189,660 |
|
|
$ |
186,127 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
86,597 |
|
|
|
82,543 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
Land sales |
|
|
9,716 |
|
|
|
44,034 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
10,423 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,165 |
|
|
|
26,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
318,014 |
|
|
|
351,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
27,077 |
|
|
|
23,998 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
19,820 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
55,809 |
|
|
|
58,006 |
|
Land sales operations |
|
|
10,097 |
|
|
|
26,400 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Property management and other costs |
|
|
18,775 |
|
|
|
20,237 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
Provisions for impairment |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
67,473 |
|
|
|
57,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
214,223 |
|
|
|
217,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
103,791 |
|
|
|
134,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(84,645 |
) |
|
|
(84,573 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(1,761 |
) |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
7,773 |
|
|
|
6,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
28,447 |
|
|
|
57,591 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
28,447 |
|
|
|
57,591 |
|
Allocation to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to joint venture partners |
|
$ |
28,160 |
|
|
$ |
57,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity In Income (loss) of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to joint venture partners |
|
$ |
28,160 |
|
|
$ |
57,666 |
|
Joint venture partners share of income |
|
|
(15,063 |
) |
|
|
(29,945 |
) |
Amortization of capital or basis differences |
|
|
(5,257 |
) |
|
|
(3,607 |
) |
Elimination of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates loan interest |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
$ |
7,538 |
|
|
$ |
23,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Financial Information of Individually Significant Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
Following is summarized financial information for GGP/Homart II L.L.C. (GGP/Homart II), GGP-TRS
L.L.C. (GGP/Teachers) and The Woodlands Land Development Holdings, L.P. (The Woodlands
Partnership). We account for these joint ventures using the equity method because we have joint
interest and control of these ventures with our venture partners and they have substantive
participating rights in such ventures. For financial reporting purposes, we consider each of these
joint ventures to be an individually significant Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliate. Our
investment in such affiliates varies from a strict ownership percentage due to capital or basis
differences or loans and related amortization.
20
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GGP/Homart II |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
239,481 |
|
|
$ |
239,481 |
|
Buildings and equipment |
|
|
2,786,757 |
|
|
|
2,761,838 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(502,944 |
) |
|
|
(482,683 |
) |
Developments in progress |
|
|
57,792 |
|
|
|
85,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
|
2,581,086 |
|
|
|
2,604,312 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
40,398 |
|
|
|
42,836 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
45,775 |
|
|
|
45,025 |
|
Deferred expenses, net |
|
|
83,571 |
|
|
|
84,902 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
17,584 |
|
|
|
27,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,768,414 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Owners Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
2,263,804 |
|
|
$ |
2,269,989 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
67,349 |
|
|
|
80,803 |
|
Owners equity |
|
|
437,261 |
|
|
|
453,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
2,768,414 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GGP/Homart II |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
61,625 |
|
|
$ |
60,994 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
28,800 |
|
|
|
27,497 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
92,904 |
|
|
|
91,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
9,315 |
|
|
|
8,134 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
6,496 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
9,820 |
|
|
|
11,265 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Property management and other costs |
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
5,583 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
Provisions for impairment |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,748 |
|
|
|
21,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
58,083 |
|
|
|
56,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
34,821 |
|
|
|
34,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(30,258 |
) |
|
|
(30,948 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
4,374 |
|
Allocation to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to joint venture partners |
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
|
$ |
4,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GGP/Teachers |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
175,344 |
|
|
$ |
177,740 |
|
Buildings and equipment |
|
|
1,089,934 |
|
|
|
1,076,748 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(152,561 |
) |
|
|
(145,101 |
) |
Developments in progress |
|
|
40,301 |
|
|
|
54,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
|
1,153,018 |
|
|
|
1,163,840 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,133 |
|
|
|
7,148 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
16,600 |
|
|
|
16,675 |
|
Deferred expenses, net |
|
|
22,268 |
|
|
|
20,011 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
19,614 |
|
|
|
17,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,218,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Owners Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
1,018,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,825 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
34,048 |
|
|
|
40,787 |
|
Owners equity |
|
|
166,198 |
|
|
|
163,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
1,218,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GGP/Teachers |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
26,239 |
|
|
$ |
29,079 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
12,893 |
|
|
|
11,903 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
Other |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
39,782 |
|
|
|
42,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
3,661 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
4,696 |
|
|
|
5,220 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Property management and other costs |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
8,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
24,863 |
|
|
|
22,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
14,919 |
|
|
|
19,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(13,644 |
) |
|
|
(13,849 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to joint venture partners |
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
6,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Woodlands Partnership |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
21,941 |
|
|
$ |
16,573 |
|
Buildings and equipment |
|
|
60,276 |
|
|
|
60,130 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(12,390 |
) |
|
|
(11,665 |
) |
Developments in progress |
|
|
87,507 |
|
|
|
71,124 |
|
Investment property and property held for development
and sale |
|
|
284,893 |
|
|
|
282,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
|
442,227 |
|
|
|
418,798 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
45,710 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
5,660 |
|
|
|
20,420 |
|
Deferred expenses, net |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
94,690 |
|
|
|
93,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
562,451 |
|
|
$ |
579,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Owners Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
309,115 |
|
|
$ |
318,930 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
71,167 |
|
|
|
74,067 |
|
Owners equity |
|
|
182,169 |
|
|
|
186,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
562,451 |
|
|
$ |
579,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Woodlands Partnership |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
Land sales |
|
|
9,716 |
|
|
|
44,034 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
13,308 |
|
|
|
47,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
Land sales operations |
|
|
10,097 |
|
|
|
26,400 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
15,006 |
|
|
|
31,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
15,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
(1,281 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to joint venture partners |
|
$ |
(2,467 |
) |
|
$ |
14,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTE 4 MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE
Mortgages, notes and loans payable are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed-rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
$ |
15,488,790 |
|
|
$ |
15,538,825 |
|
Corporate and other unsecured term loans |
|
|
3,704,719 |
|
|
|
3,701,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed-rate debt |
|
|
19,193,509 |
|
|
|
19,240,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable |
|
|
2,725,601 |
|
|
|
2,732,437 |
|
Corporate and other unsecured term loans |
|
|
2,783,700 |
|
|
|
2,783,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable-rate debt |
|
|
5,509,301 |
|
|
|
5,516,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable* |
|
$ |
24,702,810 |
|
|
$ |
24,756,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See Note 1 Liquidity regarding the impact of 2009 and 2010 scheduled maturities. |
The weighted-average interest rate (including the effects of interest rate swaps and excluding the
effects of deferred finance costs) on our mortgages, notes and loans payable was 6.09% at March 31,
2009 and 5.36% at December 31, 2008. Our mortgages, notes and loans payable have various maturities
through 2095. The weighted-average remaining term of our mortgages, notes and loans payable was
2.79 years as of March 31, 2009. The weighted average interest rate on the remaining corporate
unsecured fixed and variable rate debt and the revolving credit facility was 5.35% at March 31,
2009 and 4.29% at December 31, 2008.
As of March 31, 2009, $25.16 billion of land, buildings and equipment and developments in progress
(before accumulated depreciation) have been pledged as collateral for our mortgages, notes and
loans payable. Although substantially all of the $24.70 billion of fixed and variable rate mortgage
notes and loans payable are non-recourse to us, $2.52 billion of such mortgages, notes and loans
payable are recourse to us due to guarantees or other security provisions for the benefit of the
note holder. In addition, as of March 31, 2009 although certain mortgage loans contain other credit enhancement
provisions (primarily master leases for all or a portion of the
property), we did not
expect to be required to perform with respect to such provisions. Certain mortgage notes
payable may be prepaid but are generally subject to a prepayment penalty equal to a
yield-maintenance premium, defeasance or a percentage of the loan balance.
As previously discussed, on April 16 and 22, 2009, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11, which triggered defaults on substantially all debt obligations of the Debtors,
including the debt obligations described below. However, under
section 362 of Chapter 11,
the filing of a bankruptcy petition automatically stays most actions against the debtors estate.
Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, these prepetition liabilities are subject to
settlement under a plan of reorganization.
As discussed in the liquidity section of Note 1, we have been unable to repay or refinance certain
debt as it has come due. Although we entered into certain forbearance and waiver agreements
(described below) with certain of our lenders, all such agreements have expired at March 31, 2009
and we were in default under certain of our debt obligations at the time the Chapter 11 Cases
commenced.
Fashion Show/Palazzo Loans
On December 16, 2008, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, including Fashion Show Mall LLC
and Phase II Mall Subsidiary LLC, entered into forbearance and waiver agreements with the lenders
related to the loan agreements dated as of November 28, 2008, as amended, for the $900.0 million
mortgage loans secured by the Companys Fashion Show and The Shoppes at The Palazzo shopping
centers located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The mortgage lenders agreed to waive non-payment of the
mortgage loans until February 12, 2009. The forbearance and waiver agreements expired on February
12, 2009. As of May 7, 2009, we remain in default with respect to these loans.
Multi Property Mortgage Loans
24
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
In December 2008, we closed on eight separate loans (Multi Property Mortgage Loans) totaling
$896.0 million collateralized by eight properties. The maturity dates of these non-recourse
mortgage loans range from five to seven years, with an option by the lender to extend the loans for
an additional three years. These fixed-rate mortgage loans bear interest at 7.5% and are amortized
over a 30 year period with a balloon payment at maturity. The proceeds from the mortgage loans
were used to retire a $58.0 million note issued by TRCLP maturing in December 2008, as well as to
refinance approximately $838 million of mortgage indebtedness scheduled to mature in 2009.
Short-term Secured Loan
In October and November 2008, we closed on a Short-term Secured Loan of $225.0 million
collateralized by 27 properties. This non-recourse secured loan matured on February 1, 2009. This
variable-rate secured loan requires interest only payments until maturity. The proceeds from the
secured loan were used to refinance approximately $50 million of mortgage indebtedness maturing in
2008 and 2009 and for general corporate purposes.
Secured Portfolio Facility
In July 2008, certain of our subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement which provided for a
secured term loan of up to $1.75 billion (Secured Portfolio Facility). As of December 31, 2008,
we have received total advances of $1.51 billion under such facility that are collateralized by
first mortgages on 24 properties and have no option for additional advances. The Secured Portfolio
Facility has an initial term of three years with two one-year extension options, which are subject
to certain conditions. The interest rate payable on advances under the Secured Portfolio Facility
will be, at our option, (i) 1.25% plus the higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or (B)
the prime rate, or (ii) LIBOR plus 2.25%. The Secured Portfolio Facility requires that the interest
rate payable on a portion of the advances under the facility be hedged. As a result of these
hedging requirements, we entered into interest rate swap transactions totaling $1.08 billion, which
results in a weighted average fixed rate of 5.67% for the first two years of the initial term
(without giving effect to the amortization of the fees and costs associated with the Secured
Portfolio Facility). As of May 7, 2009, the interest rate swap
agreements were either terminated or may be terminated due to our
decision to stop making settlement payments under these agreement (see
Note 1 for more discussion regarding the status of derivative
financial instruments). We are subject to claims by the counterparties
to these interest rate swap agreements for the value of the swap at the time of
termination. Subject to
certain conditions, interest under the Secured Portfolio Facility is payable monthly in arrears and
no principal payments are due until, in certain circumstances, the initial maturity date of July
11, 2011. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have agreed to provide a repayment guarantee
of approximately $875.0 million at March 31, 2009. The proceeds from advances under the Secured
Portfolio Facility have been used to repay debt maturing in 2008 and for general corporate
purposes.
On December 18, 2008, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and the administrative agent on
behalf of the lenders parties entered into a forbearance and waiver agreement related to the
Secured Portfolio Facility. On January 30, 2009, the forbearance and waiver agreement was amended
and restated extending the agreement period to March 15, 2009. Pursuant and subject to the terms
of the forbearance agreement, the lenders agreed to waive certain identified events of default
under the credit agreement and forbear from exercising certain of the lenders default related
rights and remedies with respect to such identified defaults until March 15, 2009. This forbearance
agreement expired on March 15, 2009.
Exchangeable Senior Notes
In April 2007, GGPLP sold $1.55 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.98% Exchangeable Senior
Notes (the Notes) pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. Interest on the Notes
is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning October 15,
2007. The Notes will mature on April 15, 2027 unless previously redeemed by GGPLP, repurchased by
GGPLP or exchanged in accordance with their terms prior to such date. Prior to April 15, 2012, we
will not have the right to redeem the Notes, except to preserve our status as a REIT. On or after
April 15, 2012, we may redeem for cash all or part of the Notes at any time, at 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. On
each of April 15, 2012, April 15, 2017 and April 15, 2022, holders of the Notes may require us to
repurchase the Notes, in whole or in part, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of Notes
to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The Notes are exchangeable for GGP common stock or a combination of cash and common stock, at our
option, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, including conditions relating to the market
price of our common stock, the trading price of the Notes, the occurrence of certain corporate
events and transactions, a call for redemption of the Notes and any failure by us to maintain a
listing of our common stock on a national securities
25
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
exchange. The exchange rate for each $1,000
principal amount of the Notes is 11.27 shares of GGP common stock, which is subject to adjustment
under certain circumstances. See Note 1 for
information regarding the impact on our comparative consolidated financial statements as the result
of the retrospective application of FSP 14-1.
Collateralized Mortgages, Notes and Loans Payable
Collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable consist primarily of non-recourse notes
collateralized by individual properties and equipment. The fixed-rate collateralized mortgages,
notes and loans payable bear interest ranging from 3.43% to 10.15%. The variable-rate
collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable bear interest at LIBOR (0.50% at March 31, 2009)
plus between 100 and 125 basis points.
Corporate and Other Unsecured Term Loans
On February 24, 2006, we amended the 2004 Credit Facility, which was entered into to fund the TRC
Merger, by entering into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the 2006 Credit
Facility). The 2006 Credit Facility provides for a $2.85 billion term loan (the Term Loan) and
a $650 million revolving credit facility. Although as of March 31, 2009, $1.99 billion of the Term
Loan and $590.0 million of the revolving credit facility was outstanding, due to the various
defaults under other debt agreements, no further amounts were available to be drawn.
Under the terms of the 2006 Credit Facility, we are subject to customary affirmative and negative
covenants. If a default occurs, the lenders will have the option of declaring all outstanding
amounts immediately due and payable. Events of default include a failure to maintain our REIT
status under the Internal Revenue Code, a failure to remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange
and such customary events as nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, breach of
representations and warranties, breach of covenant, cross-default to other indebtedness and certain
bankruptcy events. On December 16, 2008, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and the
administrative agent on behalf of the 2006 Credit Facility lenders parties entered into a
forbearance and waiver agreement dated as of December 15, 2008. On January 30, 2009 the forbearance
and waiver agreement was amended and restated extending the agreement period to March 15, 2009. The
forbearance agreement expired on March 15, 2009.
The 2006 Credit Facility has a four year term. The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 1.15% to
LIBOR plus 1.5%, depending on our leverage ratio and assuming we maintain our election to have
these loans designated as Eurodollar loans. The interest rate, as of March 31, 2009, was LIBOR
plus 1.25%.
Concurrently with the 2006 Credit Facility transaction, we entered into a $1.40 billion term loan
(the Short Term Loan) and TRCLP entered into a $500.0 million term loan (the Bridge Loan). The
Short Term Loan was repaid in August 2006 as part of various refinancing transactions. The Bridge
Loan was fully repaid in May 2006 with a portion of the proceeds obtained from the sale of $800.0
million of senior unsecured notes which were issued by TRCLP. These notes provide for semi-annual,
interest-only payments at a rate of 6.75% and payment of the principal in full on May 1, 2013.
Also concurrently with the 2006 Credit Facility transaction, GGP Capital Trust I, a Delaware
statutory trust (the Trust) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GGPLP, completed a private placement
of $200.0 million of trust preferred securities (TRUPS). The Trust also issued $6.2 million of
Common Securities to GGPLP. The Trust used the proceeds from the sale of the TRUPS and Common
Securities to purchase $206.2 million of floating rate Junior Subordinated Notes of GGPLP due 2036.
The TRUPS require distributions equal to LIBOR plus 1.45%. Distributions are cumulative and
accrue from the date of original issuance. The TRUPS mature on April 30, 2036, but may be redeemed
beginning on April 30, 2011 if the Trust exercises its right to redeem a like amount of the Junior
Subordinated Notes. The Junior Subordinated Notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.45%. Though the
Trust is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GGPLP, we are not the primary beneficiary of the Trust and,
accordingly, it is not consolidated for accounting purposes under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (as
revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN
46R). As a result, we have recorded the Junior Subordinated Notes as Mortgages, Notes and Loans
Payable and our common equity interest in the Trust as Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Unsecured Term Loans
26
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
In conjunction with the TRC Merger, we acquired certain publicly-traded unsecured debt which
included 8.78% and 8.44% Notes (repaid at maturity in March 2007), 3.625% Notes and 8% Notes due
March and April 2009, respectively (currently past due), 7.2% Notes due 2012 and 5.375% Notes due
2013. Such debt totaled $1.45 billion at March 31, 2009. Under the terms of the Indenture dated as
of February 24, 1995, as long as these notes are outstanding, TRCLP is required to file with the
SEC the annual and quarterly reports and other documents which TRCLP would be required to file as
if it was subject to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, regardless of whether TRCLP was
subject to such requirements. TRCLP is no longer required to file reports or other documents with
the SEC under Section 13(a) or 15(d). Accordingly, in lieu of such filing, certain financial and
other information related to TRCLP has been included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-K. We believe that such TRCLP information is responsive to the terms of the Indenture and
that any additional information needed or actions required can be supplied or addressed. See Note 1
for more discussion regarding the past due or acceleration status of the loans.
Debtor-in-Possession Facility
On May 6, 2009, the Company and GGP Limited Partnership (GGPLP) obtained a commitment, subject to
satisfaction of certain conditions, from Canpartners Investments IV, LLC, Delaware Street Capital
Master Fund, L.P., Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., Luxor Capital Group, Pandora Select
Partners LP, Perry Principals Investments LLC, Whitebox Combined Partners LP, Whitebox Convertible
Arbitrage Partners LP, Whitebox Hedged High Yield Partners LP and Whitebox Special Opportunities
Fund Series B Partners LP (the Lenders) to provide the Company, GGPLP and certain subsidiaries
(the Debtor Subsidiaries) with post-petition financing pursuant to a Senior Secured
Debtor-In-Possession Credit, Security and Guaranty Agreement among the Company, as a co-borrower,
GGPLP, as a co-borrower, the Debtor Subsidiaries and General Growth Management, Inc., as
guarantors, an as-yet unidentified party as agent for the lenders, and the Lenders party thereto
(the DIP Credit Agreement). The DIP Credit Agreement is subject to approval by the Bankruptcy
Court. The hearing on such approval is scheduled for May 8, 2009.
The proposed DIP Credit Agreement provides for an aggregate commitment of $400 million (the DIP
Term Loan), which will be used to refinance certain pre-petition secured indebtedness and will be
available to fund the Debtors working capital requirements, including the timely payment of
employee and vendor obligations, normal operating expenses and other obligations. The proposed DIP
Credit Agreement provides that principal
outstanding on the proposed DIP Term Loan will bear interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR
(subject to a minimum LIBOR floor of 2.25%) plus 12%. No commitment fee was paid in connection
with the commitment.
Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds
We had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $150.0 million as of March 31, 2009 and
$286.2 million (including the $134.1 million appellate bond for the Glendale Matter which has been
subsequently discharged Note 1) as of December 31, 2008. These letters of credit and bonds were
issued primarily in connection with the appellate bond, insurance requirements, special real estate
assessments and construction obligations.
NOTE 5 INCOME TAXES
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code, commencing
with our taxable year beginning January 1, 1993. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including requirements to distribute at least 90% of
our ordinary taxable income and to distribute to stockholders or pay tax on 100% of capital gains
and to meet certain asset and income tests. We currently intend to maintain our REIT status,
including making the necessary distributions of taxable income and capital gain. If we meet our
2009 income distribution requirements by the end of 2009, including a distribution pursuant to a
Section 857(b)(9) distribution (declared in October, November or December and paid in January
2010), we will incur no tax liability (assuming 100% of ordinary taxable income is distributed).
If due to the constraints of the Chapter 11 Cases we are unable to make the required distributions
by year end 2009 (including a January 2010 distribution), we may still satisfy our REIT taxable
income distribution requirement by distributing our 2009 taxable income through a distribution
declared prior to September 15, 2010 with a payment before December 31, 2010, although this would
subject us to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax liability under IRC Section 4981.
27
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
We also have subsidiaries which we have elected to be treated as taxable real estate investment
trust subsidiaries and which are therefore subject to federal and state income taxes.
Unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to FIN 48 were $108.3 million and $112.9 million as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, excluding interest, of which $35.9 million and
$36.7 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, would impact our effective
tax rate. Accrued interest related to these unrecognized tax benefits amounted to $23.2 million as
of March 31, 2009 and $21.7 million as of December 31, 2008. We recognized interest expense related
to the unrecognized tax benefits of $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $2.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits
related to tax positions taken in prior years, excluding accrued interest, of $4.6 million; all of
which decreased our deferred tax liability.
Generally, we are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue
Service for the years ending December 31, 2005 through 2008 and are open to audit by state taxing
authorities for years ending December 31, 2004 through 2008. In February 2009, we were notified
that the IRS has commenced examination of the year ended December 31, 2007 for examination with
respect to two of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We are unable to determine when the examinations
will be resolved.
Based on our assessment of the expected outcome of these remaining examinations or examinations
that may commence, or as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for specific
jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits, excluding
accrued interest, for tax positions taken regarding previously filed tax returns will materially
change from those recorded at March 31, 2009. A material change in unrecognized tax benefits could
have a material effect on our statements of income and comprehensive income. As of March 31, 2009,
there are $105.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest, which due to the
reasons above, could significantly increase or decrease during the next twelve months.
NOTE 6 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Incentive Stock Plans
We grant qualified and non-qualified stock options and make restricted stock grants to attract and
retain officers and key employees through the 2003 Incentive Stock Plan. The 2003 Incentive Plan
(the 2003 Incentive Plan ) provides for the issuance of 9,000,000 shares, of which 5,555,232 shares (4,878,500 stock options
and 676,732 restricted shares) have been granted as of March 31, 2009, subject to certain customary
adjustments to prevent dilution. Additionally, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors grants employment inducement awards to senior executives on a discretionary basis, and in
the fourth quarter of 2008, granted 1,800,000 stock options to two senior executives. Stock options
are granted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at an exercise price of not
less than 100% of the fair value of our common stock on the date of the grant. The terms of the
options are determined by the Compensation Committee.
The following tables summarize stock option activity for the 2003 Incentive Stock Plan
as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Stock options outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
4,730,000 |
|
|
$ |
33.01 |
|
|
|
3,053,000 |
|
|
$ |
51.21 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchanged for restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(290,000 |
) |
|
|
54.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(197,300 |
) |
|
|
30.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding at March 31 |
|
|
4,242,700 |
|
|
$ |
31.63 |
|
|
|
3,053,000 |
|
|
$ |
51.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Outstanding |
|
|
Stock Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$0 $6.5810 |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$6.5811 - $13.1620 |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
9.99 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
9.99 |
|
$13.1621 - $19.7430 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
15.49 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
15.49 |
|
$32.9051 - $39.4860 |
|
|
531,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
35.59 |
|
|
|
531,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
35.59 |
|
$39.4861 - $46.0670 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
44.59 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
44.59 |
|
$46.0671 - $52.6480 |
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
49.75 |
|
|
|
782,500 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
49.70 |
|
$59.2291 - $65.8100 |
|
|
965,000 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
65.81 |
|
|
|
703,000 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
65.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,242,700 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
31.63 |
|
|
|
2,100,700 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
50.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value (in
thousands) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options generally vest 20% at the time of the grants and in 20% annual increments thereafter.
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options as of March 31, 2009 represents
the excess of our closing stock price ($0.71) on that date over the weighted average exercise price
multiplied by the applicable number of shares that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options,
and is therefore not presented in the table above if the result is a negative value. The intrinsic value of exercised stock options represents
the excess of our stock price, at the time the option was exercised, over the exercise price. No
options were exercised or granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009 or the three months
ended March 31, 2008.
Restricted Stock
Pursuant to the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, we make restricted stock grants to certain employees and
non-employee directors. The vesting terms of these grants are specific to the individual grant. The
vesting terms vary in that a portion of the shares vest either immediately or on the first
anniversary and the remainder vest in equal annual amounts over the next two to five years.
Participating employees must remain employed for vesting to occur (subject to certain exceptions in
the case of retirement). Shares that do not vest are forfeited. Dividends are paid on stock subject
to restrictions and are not returnable, even if the related stock does not ultimately vest.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the respective grant years as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Nonvested
restricted stock
grants outstanding
as of January 1 |
|
|
410,767 |
|
|
$ |
41.29 |
|
|
|
136,498 |
|
|
$ |
59.75 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,232 |
|
|
|
35.51 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(99,709 |
) |
|
|
41.57 |
|
|
|
(37,498 |
) |
|
|
57.06 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(65,146 |
) |
|
|
46.76 |
|
|
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
|
35.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested
restricted stock
grants outstanding
as of March 31 |
|
|
245,912 |
|
|
$ |
39.72 |
|
|
|
449,100 |
|
|
$ |
41.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)
of nonvested awards as of March 31, 2009 was 3.7 years.
The total fair value of restricted stock grants which vested during the three months ended March
31, 2009 was $0.05 million and during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $1.4 million.
Threshold-Vesting Stock Options
Under the 1998 Incentive Stock Plan (the 1998 Incentive Plan), stock incentive awards to
employees in the form of threshold-vesting stock options (TSOs) have been granted. The exercise
price of the TSO is the Current Market Price (CMP) as defined in the 1998 Incentive Plan of our
common stock on the date the TSO is granted. In order for the TSOs to vest, our common stock must
achieve and sustain the applicable threshold price for at least 20 consecutive trading days at any
time during the five years following the date of grant. Participating employees must remain
employed until vesting occurs in order to exercise the options. The threshold price is determined
by multiplying the CMP on the date of grant by an Estimated Annual Growth Rate (currently 7%) and
compounding the product over a five-year period. TSOs granted in 2004 and thereafter must be
exercised within 30 days of the vesting date. TSOs granted prior to 2004, all of which have vested,
have a term of up to 10 years.
29
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
No TSOs were granted in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and in the year ended December 31,
2008 and the 1998 Incentive Plan terminated according to its terms December 31, 2008.
The following table summarizes TSO activity as of March 31, 2009 by grant year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSO Grant Year |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
TSOs outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
1,079,194 |
|
|
|
1,012,135 |
|
Forfeited (1) |
|
|
(94,547 |
) |
|
|
(89,549 |
) |
Vested and exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSOs outstanding at March 31, 2009 (2) |
|
|
984,647 |
|
|
|
922,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value (3) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Intrinsic value options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price (4) |
|
$ |
65.81 |
|
|
$ |
50.47 |
|
Threshold price |
|
|
92.30 |
|
|
|
70.79 |
|
Fair value of options on grant date |
|
|
9.54 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
Remaining contractual term (in years) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No TSO expirations for years presented. |
|
(2) |
|
TSOs outstanding at March 31, 2009 for the years 2005 and prior were
127,128. |
|
(3) |
|
Intrinsic value is not presented if result is a negative number. |
|
(4) |
|
A weighted average exercise price is not applicable as there is only one grant date and
issuance per year. |
The Company has a $200 million per fiscal year common stock repurchase program which gives us the
ability to acquire some or all of the shares of common stock to be issued upon the exercise of the
TSOs.
Other Required Disclosures
Historical data, such as the past performance of our common stock and the length of service by
employees, is used to estimate expected life of the stock options, TSOs and our restricted stock
and represents the period of time the options or grants are expected to be outstanding. No stock
options or TSOs were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009 or for the three months
ended March 31, 2008.
Compensation expense related to the Incentive Stock Plans, TSOs and restricted stock was $3.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $2.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008.
As of March 31, 2009, total compensation expense which had not yet been recognized related to
nonvested options, TSOs and restricted stock grants was $25.3 million. Of this total, $9.6 million
is expected to be recognized in the remaining months of 2009, $8.9 million in 2010, $6.0 million in
2011, and $0.8 million in 2012. These amounts may be impacted by future grants, changes in
forfeiture estimates or vesting terms, actual forfeiture rates which differ from estimated
forfeitures and/or timing of TSO vesting.
Officer Loans
In October 2008, the independent members of the Companys Board of Directors learned that between
November 2007 and September 2008, an affiliate of certain Bucksbaum family trusts advanced a series
of unsecured loans, without the Boards approval, to Mr. Robert Michaels, the Companys former
director and president and current vice chairman, and Mr. Bernard Freibaum, the Companys former
director and chief financial officer, for the purpose of repaying personal margin debt relating to
Company common stock owned
by each of them. The loan to Mr. Michaels, which totaled $10 million, has been repaid in full.
The loans to Mr. Freibaum totaled $90 million, of which $80 million was outstanding as of the
October 2, 2008 date of Mr. Freibaums termination of employment. No Company assets or resources
were involved in the loans and no laws or Securities and Exchange Commission rules were violated as
a result of the loans. Under applicable GAAP guidance, as a result of these loans, the Company is
deemed to have received a contribution to capital by the lender and to have incurred compensation
expense in an equal amount for no incremental equity interest in
30
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
the Company. We calculated the
fair value of the loans based on a derivation of the income approach known as the discounted cash
flow method. Specifically, the fair values of the loans were calculated as the present value of
the estimated future cash flows (consisting of quarterly interest payments, an annual loan
commitment fee, and principal repayment upon demand of the loan) attributable to the loan using a
market-based discount rate that accounts for the time value of money and the appropriate degree of
risk inherent in the loans as of the various valuation dates. Included in our valuation of the fair
value of the loans is a consideration for the credit risk of the loans on each date of issuance,
based upon, among other considerations, Mr. Freibaums and Mr. Michaels stockholdings in the
Company, outstanding loans and current and past compensation from the Company. For Mr. Freibaums
loans we valued the loans at each respective disbursement date and amendment date and used loan
terms varying from six months to two years reflecting our estimation that repayment would require
an orderly liquidation of Mr. Freibaums other assets. For Mr. Michaels loans, we valued the
loan at its disbursement date based on its actual term. Accordingly, the compensation expense is
measured as the difference between the fair value of the loans as compared to the face amount of
the loans. Such calculated expenses are measured and recognizable at the date of such advances and
as of the dates of amendments as there were no future service or employment requirements stated in
the loan agreements. The total compensation expense is the aggregation of these fair value to face
amount differences. Based on our assessment, we have concluded that the impact of the cumulative
compensation expense is immaterial to our financial statements for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and for all other individual interim periods in 2008. Accordingly, we recorded the entire
cumulative compensation expense of $15.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.
NOTE 7 OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The following table summarizes the significant components of prepaid expenses and other assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Below-market ground leases (Note 2) |
|
$ |
246,084 |
|
|
$ |
247,553 |
|
Receivables finance leases and bonds |
|
|
120,468 |
|
|
|
118,543 |
|
Security and escrow deposits |
|
|
105,743 |
|
|
|
89,520 |
|
Real estate tax stabilization agreement (Note 2) |
|
|
74,550 |
|
|
|
75,531 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
69,879 |
|
|
|
63,879 |
|
Special Improvement District receivable |
|
|
50,360 |
|
|
|
51,314 |
|
Deferred tax |
|
|
50,001 |
|
|
|
37,973 |
|
Above-market tenant leases (Note 2) |
|
|
45,866 |
|
|
|
51,308 |
|
Deposit on Glendale Matter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,054 |
|
Funded defined contribution plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,517 |
|
Other |
|
|
26,062 |
|
|
|
25,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
789,013 |
|
|
$ |
835,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the significant components of accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities.
31
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Construction payable |
|
$ |
207,148 |
|
|
$ |
257,178 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
185,115 |
|
|
|
263,167 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
179,737 |
|
|
|
115,968 |
|
FIN 48 liability |
|
|
131,449 |
|
|
|
134,646 |
|
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
91,573 |
|
|
|
90,663 |
|
Deferred gains/income |
|
|
87,347 |
|
|
|
62,716 |
|
Below-market tenant leases (Note 2) |
|
|
82,460 |
|
|
|
88,756 |
|
Hughes participation payable |
|
|
73,147 |
|
|
|
73,325 |
|
Additional purchase price for The Palazzo (Note 8) |
|
|
54,013 |
|
|
|
174,229 |
|
Accrued payroll and other employee liabilities |
|
|
46,257 |
|
|
|
62,591 |
|
Tenant and other deposits |
|
|
23,415 |
|
|
|
24,452 |
|
FIN 47 liability |
|
|
22,583 |
|
|
|
23,499 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
16,987 |
|
|
|
30,222 |
|
Above-market ground leases (Note 2) |
|
|
14,899 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
Insurance reserve |
|
|
14,246 |
|
|
|
14,033 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
13,637 |
|
|
|
13,790 |
|
Nouvelle at Natick deferred revenue |
|
|
13,747 |
|
|
|
13,067 |
|
Funded defined contribution plan liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,517 |
|
Other |
|
|
90,094 |
|
|
|
74,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
1,347,854 |
|
|
$ |
1,539,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting
by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code (SOP 90-7), which is applicable to
companies in Chapter 11, generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are
prepared. However, it does require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to the
filing of the Chapter 11 petition distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated
with the Chapter 11 Cases from the ongoing operations of the business. The balance sheet must
distinguish prepetition liabilities subject to compromise from both those prepetition liabilities
that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that may be
affected by a plan of reorganization must be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even
if they may be settled for lesser amounts. In addition, cash provided by reorganization items must
be disclosed separately in the statement of cash flows. Although as of March 31, 2009, we had no
liabilities subject to compromise as we filed for Chapter 11 protection after such date, we adopted
SOP 90-7 concurrently with the commencement of our Chapter 11 Cases and will segregate those items
as outlined above for all subsequent reporting periods during our Chapter 11 Cases.
NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, from time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings relating
to the ownership and operations of our properties. In managements opinion, the liabilities, if
any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
We lease land or buildings at certain properties from third parties. The leases generally provide
us with a right of first refusal in the event of a proposed sale of the property by the landlord.
Rental payments are expensed as incurred and have, to the extent applicable, been straight-lined
over the term of the lease. Contractual rental expense, including participation rent, was $5.0
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $4.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008 while the same rent expense excluding amortization of above and below-market ground leases
and straight-line rents, as presented in our consolidated financial statements, was $3.6 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008.
32
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
We have, in the past, periodically entered into contingent agreements for the acquisition of
properties. Each acquisition is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and, in the
case of property acquired under development, completion of the project. In conjunction with the
acquisition of The Grand Canal Shoppes in 2004, we entered into an agreement (the Phase II
Agreement) to acquire the multi-level retail space that is
part of The Shoppes at The Palazzo in Las Vegas, Nevada (The Phase II Acquisition) which is
connected to the existing Venetian and the Sands Expo and Convention Center facilities and The
Grand Canal Shoppes. The project opened on January 18, 2008. The acquisition closed on February
29, 2008 for an initial purchase price of $290.8 million, which was primarily funded with $250.0
million of new variable-rate short-term debt collateralized by the property and for Federal income
tax purposes is being used as replacement property in a like-kind exchange. Additional purchase
price payments are currently estimated at $54.0 million (based on net operating income, as defined,
of the Phase II retail space), and are presented in accounts payable and accrued expenses in our
consolidated financial statements (Note 11). Such payments will be made during the 30 months after
closing with the final payment being subject to re-adjustment 48 months after closing. The actual
additional amounts paid over the next four years could be more or less than the current estimate.
See Note 5 for our obligations related to FIN 48 for disclosure of additional contingencies.
Contingent Stock Agreement
In conjunction with the TRC Merger, we assumed TRCs obligations under a Contingent Stock Agreement
(CSA). TRC entered into the CSA in 1996 when it acquired The Hughes Corporation (Hughes).
This acquisition included various assets, including Summerlin (the CSA Assets), a development in
our Master Planned Communities segment. We agreed that the TRC Merger would not have a prejudicial
effect on the former Hughes owners or their successors (the Beneficiaries) with respect to their
receipt of securities pursuant to the CSA. We further agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the
Beneficiaries against losses arising out of any breach by us of these covenants.
Under the CSA, we are required to issue shares of our common stock semi-annually (February and
August) to the Beneficiaries. The number of shares to be issued in any period is based on cash
flows from the development and/or sale of the CSA Assets and our stock price. We account for the
Beneficiaries share of earnings from the CSA Assets as an operating expense. In February 2009, we
were not obligated to deliver any shares of our common stock under the CSA. We delivered 356,661
shares of our common stock (from treasury shares) to the Beneficiaries in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. For February 2009, we were not obligated to issue any of our common stock pursuant
to this requirement as the net development and sales cash flows were negative for the applicable
period.
Under the CSA, we are also required to make a final stock distribution to the Beneficiaries in
2010, following a final valuation at the end of 2009. The amount of this distribution will be based
on the appraised values, as defined, of the CSA assets at such time and the distribution will be
accounted for as additional investments in the related assets (that is, contingent consideration).
We expect that an appraisal, which would be based on the then current market or liquidation value
of the CSA Assets, would yield a lower value than our current estimated fair value of such assets
which is based on managements financial models which project cash flows over a sales period
extending to 2031 and a discount rate of 14%. The CSA is an unsecured
obligation of the Company set forth in an executory contract which,
subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, may be assumed or rejected
by the Debtors.
NOTE 9 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued Staff Positions (FSP) FAS 157-4 (FSP FAS 157-4) which provides
guidance on determining fair value when market activity has decreased and FAS 107-1
(FSP FAS 107-1)
which requires fair value disclosures for financial instruments in interim periods. These FSPs
are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. While we are continuing to evaluate the impact
of these new FSPs on our consolidated financial
33
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
statements, we do not believe the impact of FSP
FAS 157-4 will be significant, while FSP FAS 107-1 will require additional disclosures in our Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.
NOTE 10 SEGMENTS
We have two business segments which offer different products and services. Our segments are managed
separately because each requires different operating strategies or management expertise. We do not
distinguish or group our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Further, all material
operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant comprises more than 10% of
consolidated revenues. Our reportable segments are as follows:
|
|
|
Retail and Other includes the operation, development and management of retail and
other rental property, primarily shopping centers |
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities includes the development and sale of land, primarily in
large-scale, long-term community development projects in and around Columbia, Maryland;
Summerlin, Nevada; and Houston, Texas, and our one residential condominium project located
in Natick (Boston), Massachusetts |
The operating measure used to assess operating results for the business segments is Real Estate
Property Net Operating Income (NOI) which represents the operating revenues of the properties
less property operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization and, with respect to
our retail and other segment, provisions for impairment. Management believes that NOI provides
useful information about a propertys operating performance.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those of the Company, except that we report
unconsolidated real estate ventures using the proportionate share method rather than the equity
method. Under the proportionate share method, our share of the revenues and expenses of the
Unconsolidated Properties are combined with the revenues and expenses of the Consolidated
Properties. Under the equity method, our share of the net revenues and expenses of the
Unconsolidated Properties are reported as a single line item, Equity in income of Unconsolidated
Real Estate Affiliates, in our Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. This
difference affects only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and has no
effect on our reported net earnings. In addition, other revenues include the NOI of discontinued
operations and is reduced by the NOI attributable to our noncontrolling interests in consolidated
joint ventures.
The total expenditures for additions to long-lived assets for the Master Planned Communities
segment were $17.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $53.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008. The total expenditures for additions to long-lived assets for
the Retail and Other segment were $76.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
$553.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Such amounts for the Master Planned
Communities segment and the Retail and Other segment are included in the amounts listed as
Land/residential development and acquisitions expenditures and Acquisition/development of real
estate and property additions/improvements, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
The total amount of goodwill, as presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, is included in our
Retail and Other segment.
34
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
Segment operating results are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Retail and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
499,107 |
|
|
$ |
97,391 |
|
|
$ |
596,498 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
233,019 |
|
|
|
40,819 |
|
|
|
273,838 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
11,241 |
|
Other, including noncontrolling interests |
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
|
|
28,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
757,608 |
|
|
|
152,054 |
|
|
|
909,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
71,558 |
|
|
|
12,581 |
|
|
|
84,139 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
55,356 |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
64,074 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
7,576 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
9,051 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
103,701 |
|
|
|
28,538 |
|
|
|
132,239 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
10,332 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
11,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating expenses |
|
|
248,523 |
|
|
|
52,559 |
|
|
|
301,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and other net operating income |
|
|
509,085 |
|
|
|
99,495 |
|
|
|
608,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land sales |
|
|
8,986 |
|
|
|
5,101 |
|
|
|
14,087 |
|
Land sales operations |
|
|
(10,614 |
) |
|
|
(4,768 |
) |
|
|
(15,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities net operating (loss)
income before provision
for impairment |
|
|
(1,628 |
) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
Provision for impairment |
|
|
(52,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities net operating (loss) income |
|
|
(54,397 |
) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
(54,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate property net operating income |
|
$ |
454,688 |
|
|
$ |
99,828 |
|
|
$ |
554,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
524,942 |
|
|
$ |
92,692 |
|
|
$ |
617,634 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
231,632 |
|
|
|
39,091 |
|
|
|
270,723 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
13,518 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
14,830 |
|
Other, including noncontrolling interests |
|
|
28,191 |
|
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
41,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
798,283 |
|
|
|
146,636 |
|
|
|
944,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
68,649 |
|
|
|
11,591 |
|
|
|
80,240 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
62,100 |
|
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
71,401 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
12,276 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
14,464 |
|
Other property operating costs |
|
|
111,520 |
|
|
|
29,747 |
|
|
|
141,267 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating expenses |
|
|
257,254 |
|
|
|
53,122 |
|
|
|
310,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and other net operating income |
|
|
541,029 |
|
|
|
93,514 |
|
|
|
634,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land sales |
|
|
9,066 |
|
|
|
23,118 |
|
|
|
32,184 |
|
Land sales operations |
|
|
(9,921 |
) |
|
|
(15,406 |
) |
|
|
(25,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities net operating (loss) income |
|
|
(855 |
) |
|
|
7,712 |
|
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate property net operating income |
|
$ |
540,174 |
|
|
$ |
101,226 |
|
|
$ |
641,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
The following reconciles real estate property net operating income (NOI) to GAAP-basis operating
income and (loss) income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate property net operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment basis |
|
$ |
554,516 |
|
|
$ |
641,400 |
|
Unconsolidated Properties |
|
|
(99,828 |
) |
|
|
(101,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Properties |
|
|
454,688 |
|
|
|
540,174 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
19,198 |
|
|
|
20,239 |
|
Property management and other costs |
|
|
(43,408 |
) |
|
|
(52,138 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(45,825 |
) |
|
|
(8,098 |
) |
Provisions for impairment |
|
|
(278,324 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(204,615 |
) |
|
|
(184,259 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest in NOI of Consolidated Properties and other |
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(95,438 |
) |
|
|
318,280 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(328,489 |
) |
|
|
(325,692 |
) |
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes |
|
|
11,514 |
|
|
|
(9,392 |
) |
Equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
23,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(404,145 |
) |
|
$ |
7,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following reconciles segment revenues to GAAP-basis consolidated revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment basis total property revenues |
|
$ |
909,662 |
|
|
$ |
944,919 |
|
Unconsolidated segment revenues |
|
|
(152,054 |
) |
|
|
(146,636 |
) |
Consolidated land sales |
|
|
8,986 |
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
19,198 |
|
|
|
20,239 |
|
Noncontrolling interest in NOI of Consolidated Properties and other |
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP-basis consolidated total revenues |
|
$ |
788,640 |
|
|
$ |
830,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
All references to numbered Notes are to specific footnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report and which descriptions are incorporated into the applicable
response by reference. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with such
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, in
this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
have the same meanings as in such Notes or in our Annual Report.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
We may make forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report and in other reports that we file
with the SEC. In addition, our senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to
analysts, investors, the media and others.
Forward-looking statements include:
|
|
Descriptions of plans or objectives of our management for debt repayment or restructuring,
strategic alternatives, and future operations |
|
|
|
Projections of our revenues, income, earnings per share, Funds From Operations (FFO),
capital expenditures, income tax and other contingent liabilities, dividends, leverage,
capital structure or other financial items |
36
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
Forecasts of our future economic performance |
|
|
|
Descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing |
In this Quarterly Report, for example, we make forward-looking statements discussing our
expectations about:
|
|
Bankruptcy and liquidity |
|
|
|
Future financings, repayment of debt and interest rates |
|
|
|
Expected sales in our Master Planned Communities segment |
|
|
|
Future development, management and leasing fees |
|
|
|
Distributions pursuant to the Contingent Stock Agreement |
|
|
|
Future cash needed to meet federal income tax requirements |
|
|
|
Future development spending |
Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss
future events or conditions, forward-looking statements often include words such as anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan, project, target, can, could, may,
should, will, would or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements should not be unduly
relied upon. They give our expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date they are made and we might not update them to reflect changes
that occur after the date they are made.
There are several factors, many beyond our control, which could cause results to differ materially
from our expectations. Some of these factors are described in our Annual Report, which factors are
incorporated herein by reference and some of these factors are described under Item 1A of this
Quarterly Report. Any factor could by itself, or together with one or more other factors, adversely
affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. There are also other factors
that we have not described in this Quarterly Report or in our Annual Report that could cause
results to differ from our expectations.
Overview
Our primary business is owning, managing, leasing and developing retail rental property, primarily
shopping centers. Substantially all of our properties are located in the United States, but we also
have retail rental property operations and property management activities (through unconsolidated
joint ventures) in Brazil and Turkey. Our Master Planned Communities segment includes the
development and sale of residential and commercial land, primarily in large-scale projects in and
around Columbia, Maryland; Houston, Texas; and Summerlin, Nevada, as well as the development and
sale of our one residential condominium project located in Natick (Boston), Massachusetts.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we had NOI of $554.5 million. Included in this amount is
income from our Unconsolidated Properties at our ownership share. Comparatively, in the first three
months of March 31, 2008, we reported NOI of $641.4 million. Based on the results of our
evaluations for impairment (Note 1), we recognized total impairment charges of $331.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Our liquidity is also dependent on cash flows from operations, which are affected by the severe
weakening of the economy. The downturn in the domestic retail market has resulted in reduced tenant
sales and increased tenant bankruptcies, which in turn affects our ability to generate rental
revenue. For example, sales per square foot in our Company Portfolio for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 (on a trailing twelve month basis) were $427, compared to $460 for the first quarter
of 2008, while revenues from Consolidated Properties in our Retail and Other segment were $757.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $798.3 million for the first quarter
of 2008. Further, declines in the retail economy has adversely impacted our temporary tenant
revenues, other revenues (including sponsorship, vending, parking and advertising) and overage
rents. In addition, the rapid and deep deterioration of the housing market, with new housing starts
currently at a fifty year low, negatively affects our ability to generate income through the sale
of residential land in our master planned communities. Land sales revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 were approximately $14.1 million (including both Consolidated Properties and
our share of Unconsolidated Properties), compared to $32.2 million for the first quarter of 2008.
Since mid-2008, we have undertaken extensive efforts to modify or refinance our debt, focus on our
core business, and restructure our finances outside of Chapter 11. We attempted to raise funds from
numerous
37
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
sources and retained leading investment banks to undertake a global search for sources of capital
at the corporate level. Our efforts to raise both debt and equity capital were largely
unsuccessful. We also made a concerted and sustained effort to refinance our mortgage debt in 2008,
but were unable to refinance the vast majority of our loans.
To obtain the time necessary to determine whether a long-term restructuring could be concluded out
of court, beginning in November 2008, we entered into a number of short-term extensions and
forbearance agreements with various lender groups. In March 2009, we launched a solicitation
process to obtain consents from holders of more that $2 billion in bonds issued by TRCLP to a
forbearance through December 31, 2009, and payment in kind of interest during the forbearance
period. Unfortunately, that solicitation process failed to obtain consents at a sufficient level.
We also attempted in March 2009 to negotiate a forbearance with the lenders under our 2006 Credit
Facility. However, we could not achieve a critical condition to the forbearance under the 2006
Credit Facility, which was the successful completion of the TRCLP bond solicitation process. In
summary, despite our efforts, we could not obtain creditor consent to forbearances and extensions
sufficient to allow us to effectively manage our debt obligations.
We also replaced several members of senior management in the fall of 2008 and took numerous
measures to increase short-term liquidity. These included suspension of our dividend, deferral of
property development and redevelopment projects, staff and compensation reductions, reduced travel
and other discretionary spending, and elimination of corporate aircraft contracts. We reduced our
planned spending for development and redevelopment of properties for 2009 from $185.9 million as of
December 31, 2008 to $137.3 million as of March 31, 2009, and for 2010 from $104.4 million as of
December 31, 2008 to $99.4 million as of March 31, 2009. These reductions were for capital
expenditures relating to expansion and redevelopment of shopping malls and do not affect the
companys ability to maintain its properties.
Our ability to divest assets is severely limited because prospective buyers also have limited or no
ability to finance acquisitions. Over the last five months, we have undertaken a broad and deep
marketing process, utilizing top third-party sales professionals, in an attempt to divest billions
of dollars worth of core and non-core assets, including some of our most highly-valued properties.
Although we were able to sell one parcel of land, two office parks, and three office buildings in
2008, all but one of these sales closed prior to the fourth quarter of 2008, when the economic
crisis dramatically worsened, leaving a number of core and other non-core assets on the market with
no viable offers. Although we have expressions of interest from prospective buyers for certain
properties, most of those buyers have no sources of financing and cannot proceed with the
transactions.
As described above, despite our extensive efforts we were unable to adequately address our
liquidity issues pursuant to out of court negotiations with our lenders. As a result, in order to
preserve the value of the Company and reduce and restructure our debts, GGP, the Operating
Partnership and substantially all of our legal entities which comprise our Consolidated Properties
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 in April 2009. These filings and their
effects are further described in greater detail below. Collectively, the entities which filed for
bankruptcy protection own and operate approximately 166 regional shopping centers, and we intend to
work with their constituencies to emerge from bankruptcy as quickly as possible while executing on
a plan of reorganization that preserves our integrated, national business operations. However,
none of GGMI, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, or any of our joint ventures, have sought
bankruptcy protection.
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filings
On April 16, 2009 (the Petition Date), the Company, Operating Partnership and certain of the
Companys domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11. On April
22, 2009, certain additional domestic subsidiaries (collectively with the subsidiaries filing on
April 16, 2009, the Company and the Operating Partnership, the Debtors) of the Company also filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11.
Subject to
certain exceptions under Chapter 11, the Debtors Chapter 11 filing
automatically enjoined, or stayed, the continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings
or other actions against the Debtors or their property to recover on, collect or secure a claim
arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to obtain possession
of property from the Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against the property of the
Debtors, or to collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a
pre-petition claim are enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay. We
38
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
are paying vendors for goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the
ordinary course of business.
In addition, on April 16, 2009, we received a notice of delisting from the New York Stock Exchange
(the Exchange) under Rule 802.01 of the NYSE Continued Listing Criteria that the Companys common
stock has been suspended from trading on the Exchange and will be delisted from the Exchange as a
result of the bankruptcy filing. On April 16, 2009, the Companys common stock began trading on
the Pink Sheet Electronic Quotation Service (Pink Sheets) under the symbol GGWPQ. The last day
that the Companys common stock traded on the Exchange was April 15, 2009.
Finally, the filing of the Chapter 11 petitions constituted an event of default under certain of
our debt obligations, and those debt obligations became automatically and immediately due and
payable, subject to an automatic stay of any action to collect, assert, or recover a claim against
the Company under Chapter 11 as discussed above.
Chapter 11 Process
The Debtors are currently operating as debtors in possession under the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of
Chapter 11 and orders
of the Bankruptcy Court. In general, as debtors in possession, we are authorized under Chapter 11
to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the
ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. On April 17, 2009,
the Bankruptcy Court granted a variety of first day motions that will allow the Company, on an
interim basis, to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course without interruption, and
covering, among other things, employee obligations, critical service providers, tax matters,
insurance matters, tenant obligations, cash management and cash collateral. The Debtors have
retained, subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, legal and financial professionals to advise the
Debtors on the bankruptcy proceedings and certain other ordinary course professionals. From time
to time, the Debtors may seek Bankruptcy Court approval for the retention of additional
professionals. A hearing on a number of these matters will take place on May 8, 2009.
The Bankruptcy Court will also hear a motion on May 8, 2009 with respect to authorizing the Company
and GGPLP, as co-borrowers, to enter into the DIP Credit Agreement.
The proposed DIP Credit Agreement provides for a $400 million proposed DIP Term Loan, which will be
used to refinance certain pre-petition secured indebtedness and will be available to fund the
Debtors working capital requirements, including the timely payment of employee and vendor
obligations, normal operating expenses and other obligations. The proposed DIP Credit Agreement
provides that principal outstanding on the proposed DIP Term Loan will bear interest at an annual
rate equal to LIBOR (subject to a minimum LIBOR floor of 2.25%) plus 12%.
Subject to certain conditions precedent, the Company will have the right to elect to repay all or a
portion of the outstanding principal amount of the proposed DIP Term Loan, plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon, at maturity by issuing either common stock or debt of the Company to the Lenders.
In the case of conversion to common stock, such stock-settled repayment right will be limited to
the Lenders receipt of Company common stock equaling no more than 6.0% of such common stock on a
fully-diluted basis or 8.0% of such common stock, without giving effect to stock held back for the
payment of contingencies. If the Company chooses to convert a portion of the proposed DIP Term
Loan to debt, the Company must issue a minimum of $100 million in principal to the Lenders. Such
debt would be issued for a three-year term, prepayable at any time, and otherwise on terms
substantially similar to those of the proposed DIP Term Loan.
In order to successfully exit Chapter 11, we will need to propose and obtain confirmation by the
Bankruptcy Court of a plan of reorganization that satisfies the
requirements of Chapter 11. A plan of reorganization would, among other things, resolve our pre-petition obligations, set
forth the revised capital structure of the newly reorganized entity and provide for corporate
governance subsequent to exit from bankruptcy.
We have the exclusive right for 120 days after the Petition Date to file a plan of reorganization
and, if we do so, 60 additional days to obtain necessary acceptances of our plan. If this
exclusivity period lapses without
39
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
approval of our plan of reorganization by the Bankruptcy Court, any party in interest would be able
to file a plan of reorganization for any of the Debtors. In addition to being voted on by holders
of impaired claims and equity interests, a plan of reorganization must satisfy certain requirements
of Chapter 11 and must be approved, or confirmed, by the Bankruptcy Court in order to
become effective.
The timing of filing a plan of reorganization by us will depend on the timing and outcome of
numerous other ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 Cases. There can be no assurance at this time that
a plan of reorganization will be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court or that any such plan will be
implemented successfully.
As
required by Chapter 11, the United States Trustee for the Southern District of New York
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors (the Creditors Committee). The Creditors
Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard on all matters that come before
the Bankruptcy Court with respect to the Debtors. There can be no assurance that the Creditors
Committee will support the Debtors positions on matters to be presented to the Bankruptcy Court in
the future or on any plan of reorganization, once proposed. Disagreements between the Debtors and
the Creditors Committee could protract the Chapter 11 Cases, negatively impact the Debtors
ability to operate and delay the Debtors emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant costs associated with our reorganization.
The amount of these costs are expected to significantly affect our results of operations.
Under the
priority scheme established by Chapter 11, unless creditors agree otherwise,
pre-petition liabilities and post-petition liabilities must be satisfied in full before
stockholders are entitled to receive any distribution or retain any property under a plan of
reorganization. The ultimate recovery to creditors and/or stockholders, if any, will not be
determined until confirmation of a plan of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what
values, if any, will be ascribed in the Chapter 11 Cases to each of these constituencies or what
types or amounts of distributions, if any, they would receive. A plan of reorganization could
result in holders of our liabilities and/or securities, including our common stock, receiving no
distribution on account of their interests and cancellation of their holdings. Because of such
possibilities, the value of our liabilities and securities, including our common stock, is highly
speculative. Appropriate caution should be exercised with respect to existing and future
investments in any of the liabilities and/or securities of the Debtors. At this time there is no
assurance we will be able to successfully propose or implement a plan of reorganization.
In order to emerge from bankruptcy, we may need to obtain alternative financing to replace the DIP
Credit Agreement and to satisfy the secured claims of our pre-bankruptcy creditors.
Reporting Requirements
As a result of the Chapter 11 filing, we are now required to periodically file various documents
with, and provide certain information to, the Bankruptcy Court, including statements of financial
affairs, schedules of assets and liabilities, and monthly operating reports in forms prescribed by
Chapter 11, as well as certain financial information on an unconsolidated basis. Such
materials will be prepared according to requirements of Chapter 11. While we believe that
these documents and reports provide then-current information required
under Chapter 11,
they are prepared only for the Debtors and, hence, certain operational entities are excluded. In
addition, they are prepared in a format different from that used in our consolidated financial
statements filed under the securities laws and they are unaudited. Accordingly, we believe that the
substance and format do not allow meaningful comparison with our regular publicly-disclosed
consolidated financial statements. Moreover, the materials filed with the Bankruptcy Court are not
prepared for the purpose of providing a basis for an investment decision relating to our
securities, or for comparison with other financial information filed with the SEC.
Results of Operations
We have presented the following discussion of our results of operations on a segment basis under
the proportionate share method. Under the proportionate share method, our share of the revenues and
expenses of the Unconsolidated Properties are combined with the revenues and expenses of the
Consolidated Properties. Other revenues are increased by the real estate net operating income of
discontinued operations, if applicable, and are reduced by our consolidated noncontrolling
interests of the venturers share of real estate net operating
40
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
income. See Note 10 for additional information including reconciliations of our segment basis
results to GAAP basis results.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Retail and Other Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
$ Increase |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Property revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents |
|
$ |
596,498 |
|
|
$ |
617,634 |
|
|
$ |
(21,136 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
273,838 |
|
|
|
270,723 |
|
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Overage rents |
|
|
11,241 |
|
|
|
14,830 |
|
|
|
(3,589 |
) |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
Other, including minority interest |
|
|
28,085 |
|
|
|
41,732 |
|
|
|
(13,647 |
) |
|
|
(32.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
909,662 |
|
|
|
944,919 |
|
|
|
(35,257 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
84,139 |
|
|
|
80,240 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
64,074 |
|
|
|
71,401 |
|
|
|
(7,327 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
9,051 |
|
|
|
14,464 |
|
|
|
(5,413 |
) |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
Other property operating costs |
|
|
132,239 |
|
|
|
141,267 |
|
|
|
(9,028 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
11,579 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
8,575 |
|
|
|
285.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating expenses |
|
|
301,082 |
|
|
|
310,376 |
|
|
|
(9,294 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate property net operating income |
|
$ |
608,580 |
|
|
$ |
634,543 |
|
|
$ |
(25,963 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rents decreased primarily due to an $11.7 million decrease in termination income, which was
$9.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $21.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in termination income was primarily due to a $6.4
million anchor termination at West Oaks Mall in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was also
partially due to $2.7 million of a reduction in rent due to the sale of three office buildings and
two office parks in 2008. In addition, temporary rental revenue decreased by $3.2 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
straight-line rent decreased by $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2008. These decreases in minimum rents were partially offset by
increases that resulted from of the acquisition of The Shoppes at The Palazzo and the completion of
the development at The Shops at Fallen Timbers and the redevelopment at Natick Collection.
Certain of our leases include both a base rent component and a component which requires tenants to
pay amounts related to all, or substantially all, of their share of real estate taxes and certain
property operating expenses, including common area maintenance and insurance. The portion of the
tenant rent from these leases attributable to real estate tax and operating expense recoveries are
recorded as tenant recoveries. The increase in tenant recoveries for the three months ended March
31, 2009 is partially attributable to the increased GLA as a result of the acquisition of The
Shoppes at The Palazzo in 2008.
The decrease in overage rent is primarily due to a decrease in comparable tenant sales as a result
of the current challenging economic environment impacting many of our tenants throughout our
portfolio of properties, primarily due to The Grand Canal Shoppes. These decreases were partially
offset by increases resulting from the acquisition of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Other revenues include all other property revenues including vending, parking, gains or losses on
dispositions of certain property transactions, sponsorship and advertising revenues, less NOI of
noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures. The decrease in other revenues is
primarily attributable to dispositions of land parcels at Kendall Town Center that resulted in a
$3.9 million loss on sale of land in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and a $4.3 million gain
on sale of land in the three months ended March 31, 2008. In addition, the decrease was
attributable to lower sponsorship, show and display revenue and lower gift card revenue in the
three months ended March 31, 2009.
Real estate taxes increased in the three months ended March 31, 2009 across the Company Portfolio.
Repairs and maintenance decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to
reductions in costs related to payroll, snow removal, contracted services, landscaping, building
repairs, HVAC and trash removal.
41
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
Marketing expenses decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2009 across the Company Portfolio
as the result of continued company-wide efforts to consolidate marketing functions and reduce
advertising spending. The largest savings were the result of reductions in payroll and advertising
costs.
Other property operating costs decreased primarily due to reductions in payroll costs, security
expenses, insurance expense and reduced office expenses and professional fees.
The provision for doubtful accounts increased across the Company Portfolio primarily due an
increase in tenant bankruptcies and increased aging of tenant receivables.
Master Planned Communities Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
$ Increase |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Land sales |
|
$ |
14,087 |
|
|
$ |
32,184 |
|
|
$ |
(18,097 |
) |
|
|
(56.2 |
)% |
Less Land sales operations |
|
|
15,382 |
|
|
|
25,327 |
|
|
|
(9,945 |
) |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planned Communities net operating (loss) income
before provision for impairment |
|
$ |
(1,295 |
) |
|
$ |
6,857 |
|
|
$ |
(8,152 |
) |
|
|
(118.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for impairment |
|
|
(52,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,769 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate property net operating (loss) income |
|
$ |
(54,064 |
) |
|
$ |
6,857 |
|
|
$ |
(60,921 |
) |
|
|
(888.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in land sales, land sales operations and NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was the result of a significant reduction in sales volume and lower achieved margins at our
Summerlin, Maryland, Bridgeland and The Woodlands residential communities. For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, we sold 23.4 residential acres compared to 111.2 acres for the three months
ended March 31, 2008. We sold 19.2 acres of commercial lots for the three months ended March 31,
2009 compared to 8.6 acres for the three months ended March 31, 2008. We recorded a provision for
impairment at our Fairwood community in Maryland which was based on the estimated loss resulting
from a contract to sell the remaining single family lots in July 2009.
As of March 31, 2009, the master planned communities have approximately 18,000 remaining saleable
acres.
Certain Significant Consolidated Revenues and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
$ Increase |
|
% Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Tenant rents |
|
$ |
742,151 |
|
|
$ |
770,092 |
|
|
$ |
(27,941 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Land sales |
|
|
8,986 |
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Property operating expenses |
|
|
248,523 |
|
|
|
257,254 |
|
|
|
(8,731 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Land sales operations |
|
|
10,614 |
|
|
|
9,921 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
19,198 |
|
|
|
20,239 |
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Property management and other costs |
|
|
43,408 |
|
|
|
52,138 |
|
|
|
(8,730 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
45,825 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
37,727 |
|
|
|
465.9 |
|
Provisions for impairment |
|
|
331,093 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
330,721 |
|
|
|
88,903.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
204,615 |
|
|
|
184,259 |
|
|
|
20,356 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
328,489 |
|
|
|
325,692 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(11,514 |
) |
|
|
9,392 |
|
|
|
(20,906 |
) |
|
|
(222.6 |
) |
Equity in income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates |
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
23,828 |
|
|
|
(16,290 |
) |
|
|
(68.4 |
) |
Discontinued operations loss on dispositions |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in consolidated tenant rents (which includes minimum rents, tenant recoveries and overage
rents), land sales, property operating expenses (which includes real estate taxes, repairs and
maintenance, marketing, other
property operating costs and provision for doubtful accounts) and land sales operations were
attributable to the same items discussed above in our segment basis results, excluding those items
related to our Unconsolidated Properties.
Management and other fees, property management and other costs and general and administrative in
the aggregate represent our costs of doing business and are generally not direct property-related
costs.
42
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
The decrease in property management and other costs for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is
primarily due to lower overall management costs, including payroll and bonus expense, stock
compensation expense and travel expense primarily related to a reduction in personnel and other
cost reduction efforts.
The increase in general and administrative for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is primarily
due to increased professional fees for restructuring and strategic initiatives.
Based on the results of our evaluations for impairment (Note 1), we recognized impairment charges
of $81.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to our River Falls Mall located
in Clarksville, Indiana, and recognized impairment charges of $40.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 related to our Owings Mills Mall located in Owings Mills, Maryland. We also
recognized impairment charges of $16.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to
the write down of various pre-development costs that were determined to be non-recoverable due to
the related projects being terminated. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
recognized impairment charges of $24.2 million for our development project in Allen, Texas, and
$6.7 million related to our development project in Redlands, California. We recorded an impairment
charge of $52.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to our Fairwood master
planned community. We recorded provisions for impairment related to the allocated goodwill of
$109.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
The increase in interest expense is primarily due to loan extensions that we entered into in the
fourth quarter of 2008 for the loans at Fashion Show, The Shoppes at The Palazzo and Tucson. The
financing activity in the fourth quarter of 2008 resulted in significant increases in interest
rates and loan fees. In addition, the financing of the Secured Portfolio Facility, which was
entered into in July 2008, also increased interest expense for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Lastly, the increase in interest expense was also due to a decrease in the amount of
capitalized interest as a result of decreased development spending for the three months ended March
31, 2009. These increases were partially offset by the termination of the majority of our
consolidated interest rate swaps for the three months ended March 31, 2009 that resulted in a
decrease to interest expense, while the impact to prior periods was to other comprehensive income
(see Note 1 for more detail regarding the termination of the interest rate swaps).
The increase in (benefit from) provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was primarily attributable to tax benefit related to the $52.8 million provision for impairment
that we recorded for our Fairwood master planned community.
The decrease in equity in income of unconsolidated real estate affiliates is primarily due to a
significant decrease in land sales at our Woodlands Partnership joint venture for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Reference is made to Note 6 for further discussion regarding the officer loans. Based on our
assessment, we have concluded that the impact of the cumulative compensation expense is immaterial
to our financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and for all other individual
interim periods in 2008. Accordingly, we recorded the entire cumulative compensation expense of
$15.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As more fully described below, as of March 31, 3009, a substantial portion of our debt was in
default. As previously discussed, on April 16 and 22, 2009, GGP and certain of its subsidiaries
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11, which triggered defaults on substantially
all debt obligations of the Debtors. However, under section 362 of
Chapter 11, the filing
of a bankruptcy petition automatically stays most actions
against the debtors estate. Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially all
prepetition liabilities are subject to settlement under a plan of reorganization.
The DIP Credit Agreement provides for a $400 million term loan, which is intended to be used for
refinancing certain pre-petition secured indebtedness and fund working capital requirements. The
proceeds of the DIP Credit Agreement, together with cash generated from operations and cash on hand
($195.7 million as of March 31, 2009) will be used to fund post-petition operating expenses. We
believe that these sources of funds should
43
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
provide the Company with sufficient liquidity to finance
its operations in the ordinary course, including those of its non-Debtor subsidiaries as it seeks
to restructure its debt obligations through the Chapter 11 process.
As more fully described in Note 1 and Note 4, as of March 31, 2009, we had $2.01 billion in
past due debt, and an additional $4.09 billion in debt that was in default and could be accelerated
by our lenders. Significant debt obligations that were past due or otherwise in default as of
March 31, 2009 included the Fashion Show/Palazzo Loans, the 2006 Credit Facility, the Secured
Portfolio Facility, a short-term secured loan of $225.0 million, and an aggregate of $2.25 billion
of unsecured bonds issued by TRCLP (including $395.0 million which were past due as of March 31,
2009). The Debtors Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings in April, 2009 triggered defaults on
substantially all debt obligations of the Debtors, including the $1.55 billion aggregate principal
amount of 3.98% Exchangeable Senior Notes issued by the Operating Partnership.
Summary of Cash Flows
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating
activities was $159.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and $139.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
Cash used for Land/residential development and acquisitions expenditures was $17.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 a decline from $53.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008 as we have slowed the pace of residential land development in
2009 to conform to sales pace declines.
Net cash
(used in) provided by
certain assets and liabilities, including accounts and notes
receivable, prepaid expense and other assets, deferred expenses, and
accounts payable and accrued expenses and deferred tax liabilities
totaled $(34.6) million in 2009 and $25.1
million in 2008 as significant year-end receivables had been collected by March 31, 2008
whereas such amounts generally remain outstanding at March 31, 2009 subject to reserved
amounts. In addition, our cash retention efforts in 2009 allowed us to reduce accounts
payable in such period whereas accounts payable increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in
investing activities was $73.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and $491.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net investing cash (used in) provided by our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates was $(3.0)
million in 2009 and $41.5 million in 2008. In 2008, significant loan proceeds were obtained from GGP/Homart II, whereas such loans were partially paid down in 2009.
Cash used
for acquisition/development of real estate and property additions/improvements was $79.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 a decline from
$553.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 primarily due to the completion,
deferral or termination of a number of development projects in late 2008 and early 2009.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash
(used in) provided by financing activities was $(58.9) million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and $500.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Principal payments exceeded new financings by $58.0 million in 2009 and $166.3 million in 2008.
Distributions to common stockholders, holders of Common Units and holders of perpetual and
convertible preferred units totaled $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
$150.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. No dividends were paid during 2009,
while dividends per common share were $0.50 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Certain
dividends and distributions, including dividends to common stockholders, were suspended for the
first quarter 2009 to preserve working capital. In determining whether to declare a distribution,
the Board of Directors considers a number of factors, including operating cash flow. There can be
no assurance that such distributions will recommence.
Seasonality
Although we have a year-long temporary leasing program, occupancies for short-term tenants and,
therefore, rental income recognized, are higher during the second half of the year. In addition,
the majority of our tenants have December or January lease years for purposes of calculating annual
overage rent amounts. Accordingly,
44
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
overage rent thresholds are most commonly achieved in the
fourth quarter. As a result, revenue production is generally highest in the fourth quarter of each
year.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are both significant to the overall presentation of our
financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, complex or
subjective judgments. Our critical accounting policies as discussed in our 2008 Annual Report have
not changed during 2009 and such policies, and the discussion of such policies, are incorporated
herein by reference.
REIT Requirements
In order to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes, we
must distribute or pay tax on 100% of our capital gains and at least 90% of our ordinary taxable
income to stockholders. We may not have sufficient liquidity to meet these distribution
requirements. In determining distributions, the Board of Directors considers operating cash flow.
The Board of Directors may alternatively elect to pay a portion of any required dividend in stock
as a taxable stock dividend.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
As described in Note 9, new accounting pronouncements have been issued which impact or could impact
the prior, current, or subsequent years.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no significant changes in the market risks described in our Annual Report.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act)). Based on that evaluation, the
CEO and the CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls during our most recently completed fiscal
quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Neither the Company nor any of the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates is currently involved in
any material pending legal proceedings nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding
currently threatened against the Company or any of the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report are as follows:
Bankruptcy Risks
We filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
45
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
As more fully described elsewhere in this report, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions to
reorganize under Chapter 11 on April 16 and April 22, 2009. During our Chapter 11 Cases, we plan
to continue to operate our business as a debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of
Chapter 11. Our
operations, including our ability to execute our business plan, are subject to the risks and
uncertainties associated with bankruptcy, including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
Actions and decisions of our creditors and other third parties with interests in our
Chapter 11 Cases may be inconsistent with our plans |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to obtain court approval with respect to motions in the Chapter 11
Cases that we believe are in the best interests of the Company |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to successfully develop, prosecute, confirm and consummate a plan of
reorganization with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases (the Plan of Reorganization) |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to retain and/or renew existing tenants may be hampered |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements and therefore be
unable to remain qualified as a REIT |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to build new tenant relationships and desirable new tenants may have
concerns about entering into leases at our properties |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to obtain and maintain commercially reasonable terms with vendors,
strategic partners and service providers may be hampered |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to obtain and maintain contracts necessary to continue our operations at
affordable rates with competitive terms may be hampered |
|
|
|
|
Our access to capital to initiate or continue development or redevelopment at our
properties may be limited |
|
|
|
|
We may encounter third parties seeking and obtaining court approval to terminate or
shorten the exclusivity period for us to propose and confirm the Plan of Reorganization,
to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee or to convert the case to a Chapter 7 case. |
The ultimate impact that events that occur during these proceedings will have on our business,
financial condition and results of operations cannot be accurately predicted or quantified.
Our liquidity position imposes significant risks to our operations.
The proposed DIP Credit Agreement provides for a term loan in the aggregate amount of $400 million,
which is intended to be used to refinance certain pre-petition secured indebtedness and fund
working capital requirements.
There can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will authorize the Debtors to enter into the
proposed DIP Credit Agreement on the terms heretofore negotiated. Furthermore, there can be no
assurance that the amounts of cash from operations together with amounts available under our
proposed DIP Credit Agreement will be sufficient to fund operations. In the event that cash flows
and borrowings under the proposed DIP Credit
Agreement are not sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements, we may be required to seek
additional financing. There can be no assurance that such additional financing would be available
or, if available, would be offered on acceptable terms. Failure to secure any necessary additional
financing would have a material adverse impact on our operations and ongoing viability.
Operating
under Chapter 11 may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies.
46
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
Under Chapter 11, transactions outside the ordinary course of business will be subject to
the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court, which may limit our ability to respond in a timely
manner to certain events or take advantage of certain opportunities. We must obtain Bankruptcy
Court approval to, among other things:
|
|
|
Sell assets outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
Consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our
assets; |
|
|
|
|
Grant liens; and |
|
|
|
|
Finance our operations, investments or other capital needs or to engage in other
business activities that would be in our interest. |
The pursuit of the
Chapter 11 Cases has consumed and will consume a substantial portion of the time
and attention of our corporate management and will impact how our business is conducted, which may
have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The requirements of the Chapter 11 Cases has consumed and will continue to consume a substantial
portion of our corporate managements time and attention and leave them with less time to devote to
the operations of our business. This diversion of corporate managements attention may have a
material adverse effect on the conduct of our business, and, as a result, on our financial
condition and results of operations, particularly if the Chapter 11 Cases is protracted.
We may experience increased levels of employee attrition, and our employees are facing considerable
distractions and uncertainty, due to the Chapter 11 Cases.
Because of the Chapter 11 Cases, we may experience increased levels of employee attrition, and our
employees are facing considerable distractions and uncertainty. A loss of key personnel or a
substantial reduction in our workforce or material erosion of employee morale could have a material
adverse effect on our business, particularly if the Chapter 11 Cases is protracted. Our ability to
engage, motivate and retain key employees is restricted by provisions
of Chapter 11, which
limit or prevent our ability to implement a retention program or take other measures intended to
motivate key employees to remain with us throughout the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases without
Bankruptcy Court approval. The loss of the services of any members of
our senior management could
impair our ability to execute our strategy and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations.
As a result of our Chapter 11 Cases, our historical financial information may not be indicative of
our future financial performance.
Our capital structure will likely be significantly changed under any Plan of Reorganization. Under
fresh start accounting rules that may apply to us upon the effective date of any Plan of
Reorganization, our assets and
47
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
liabilities would be adjusted to fair values and our accumulated
deficit would be restated to zero. Accordingly, if fresh start accounting rules apply, our
financial condition and results of operations following our emergence from Chapter 11 would not be
comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical
financial statements. In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases and the development of any Plan of
Reorganization, it is also possible that additional restructuring and similar charges may be
identified and recorded in future periods. Such charges could be material to our consolidated
financial position and results of operations in any given period.
Risks that Relate to Our Common Stock
Trading in our securities during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases is highly speculative and
poses substantial risks. It is impossible to predict at this time whether our common stock will be
cancelled or if holders of such common stock will receive any distribution with respect to, or be
able to recover any portion of, their investments.
It is unclear at this stage of the Chapter 11 Cases if any Plan of Reorganization would allow for
distributions with respect to our common stock and other outstanding equity interests. It is
possible that these equity interests will be cancelled and extinguished upon the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court and the holders thereof would not be entitled to receive, and would not receive or
retain, any property or interest in property on account of such equity interests. In the event of
a cancellation of these equity interests, amounts invested by such holders in our outstanding
equity securities will not be recoverable. Consequently, our currently outstanding common stock
would have no value. Trading prices for our common stock are very volatile and may bear little or
no relationship to the actual recovery, if any, by the holders of such securities in the Chapter 11
Cases. Accordingly, we urge that extreme caution be exercised with respect to existing and future
investments in our equity securities and any of our other securities.
Our common stock has been suspended from trading on and will be delisted from the New York Stock
Exchange and is not listed on any other national securities exchange.
On April 16, 2009, we received a notice of delisting from the Exchange under Rule 802.01 of the
NYSE Continued Listing Criteria that the Companys common stock has been suspended from trading on
the Exchange and will be delisted from the Exchange as a result of the bankruptcy filing. On April
17, 2009, the Companys common stock began trading on the Pink Sheets under the symbol GGWPQ. The
last day that the Companys common stock traded on the Exchange was April 15, 2009.
The Company does not intend to take any further action to appeal the Exchanges decision, and
therefore it is expected that the common stock will be delisted after the completion of the
Exchanges application to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We can provide no assurance that we will be able to re-list our common stock on a national
securities exchange or that the stock will continue being traded on the Pink Sheets. The trading of
our common stock on the Pink Sheets rather than the Exchange may negatively impact the trading
price of our common stock and the levels of liquidity available to our stockholders. In addition,
securities that trade on the Pink Sheets are not eligible for margin loans and make our common
stock subject to the provisions of Rule 15g-9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, commonly
referred to as the penny stock rule.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
For a discussion of the Companys indebtedness and defaults thereunder, See Part I, Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, particularly
the discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
48
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Forbearance and Waiver Agreement by and among General Growth Properties,
Inc. and certain additional parties thereto dated as of January 30, 2009 (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2009 which was filed with the
SEC on February 3, 2009). |
|
10.2 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2009 by and among the Company, GGP
Limited Partnership and Adam S. Metz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2009 which was filed with the SEC on March 10, 2009). |
|
10.3 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2009 by and among the Company, GGP
Limited Partnership and Thomas H. Nolan, Jr. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2009 which was filed with the SEC on March 10, 2009). |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
99.1 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of The Rouse Company LP, a subsidiary of General Growth
Properties, Inc. |
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(v) of Regulation S-K, the registrant has not filed debt instruments
relating to long-term debt that is not registered and for which the total amount of securities
authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on
a consolidated basis as of March 31, 2009. The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such
agreements to the SEC upon request.
49
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
by:
|
|
/s/ Edmund Hoyt
Edmund Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(On behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
99.1 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of The Rouse Company LP, a subsidiary of
General Growth Properties, Inc. |
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(v) of Regulation S-K, the registrant has not filed debt instruments
relating to long-term debt that is not registered and for which the total amount of securities
authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on
a consolidated basis as of March 31, 2009. The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such
agreements to the SEC upon request.
51