10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark
One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
001-32958
Crystal River Capital,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-2230150
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Three World Financial
Center,
200 Vesey Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY
|
|
10281-1010
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(212) 549-8400
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding shares of the registrants common
stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of May 14, 2007
was 25,001,800.
CRYSTAL RIVER
CAPITAL, INC.
INDEX
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in thousands,
except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities, at
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial MBS
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
|
$
|
472,572
|
|
Residential MBSNon-Agency MBS
|
|
|
270,705
|
|
|
|
287,243
|
|
Agency MBS
|
|
|
2,010,836
|
|
|
|
2,532,101
|
|
ABS
|
|
|
44,162
|
|
|
|
46,132
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
4,018
|
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
252,680
|
|
|
|
237,670
|
|
Commercial real estate, net
|
|
|
210,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
58,115
|
|
|
|
20,133
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
83,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,586
|
|
|
|
39,023
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
76,419
|
|
|
|
79,483
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal paydown
|
|
|
6,417
|
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
16,081
|
|
|
|
19,380
|
|
Interest purchased
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
Swap receivable
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
Other receivable
|
|
|
13,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
11,223
|
|
|
|
4,929
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
14,195
|
|
|
|
20,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,615,394
|
|
|
$
|
3,774,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and cash collateral payable
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
11,486
|
|
Due to Manager
|
|
|
4,131
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
Due to broker
|
|
|
80,454
|
|
|
|
94,881
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
16,514
|
|
Intangible liabilities
|
|
|
73,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
1,989,928
|
|
|
|
2,723,643
|
|
Repurchase agreements, related party
|
|
|
124,806
|
|
|
|
144,806
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
516,895
|
|
|
|
194,396
|
|
Junior subordinated notes
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage payable
|
|
|
198,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
17,583
|
|
|
|
19,417
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
17,137
|
|
|
|
11,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,094,534
|
|
|
|
3,218,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, par value
$0.001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par
value, 500,000,000 shares authorized,
25,021,800 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
566,676
|
|
|
|
566,285
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(13,145
|
)
|
|
|
13,212
|
|
Declared dividends in excess of
earnings
|
|
|
(32,696
|
)
|
|
|
(23,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
520,860
|
|
|
|
556,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
3,615,394
|
|
|
$
|
3,774,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
50,204
|
|
|
$
|
37,740
|
|
Interest income real
estate loans
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
Other interest and dividend income
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
57,229
|
|
|
|
41,078
|
|
Rental income, net
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
57,767
|
|
|
|
41,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
40,135
|
|
|
|
28,851
|
|
Management fees, related party
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive fees
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Public company expense
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
44,251
|
|
|
|
31,616
|
|
Other revenues
(expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net gain (loss) on sale of
real estate loans and securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized (loss) gain
on derivatives
|
|
|
(8,450
|
)
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
Impairment of available for sale
securities
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange gain
(loss)
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Income from equity investments
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
(expenses)
|
|
|
(5,972
|
)
|
|
|
5,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,544
|
|
|
$
|
15,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share of
common stock
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common
stock outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
25,043,565
|
|
|
|
17,495,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
25,043,565
|
|
|
|
17,495,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders
Equity
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Dividends in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
25,021,800
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
566,285
|
|
|
$
|
13,212
|
|
|
$
|
(23,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
556,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
$
|
7,544
|
|
Net unrealized holdings loss on
securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,113
|
)
|
|
|
(21,113
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
Realized net loss on cash flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
Amortization of net realized gains
on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,032
|
)
|
|
|
(17,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock based
compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of stock based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
25,021,800
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
566,676
|
|
|
$
|
(13,145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,696
|
)
|
|
$
|
520,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,544
|
|
|
$
|
15,444
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of stock based
compensation
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Accretion of net discount on
available for sale securities and loans
|
|
|
(3,161
|
)
|
|
|
(1,997
|
)
|
Realized net loss (gain) on sale of
available for sale securities
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
568
|
|
Impairment of available for sale
securities
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Accretion of interest on real
estate loans
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net realized cash
flow hedge gain
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on
derivatives
|
|
|
8,585
|
|
|
|
(7,568
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing
costs
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
Income from equity investment
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred income tax
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on foreign currency
translation
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible
liabilities
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on settlement of
derivatives
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
(2,823
|
)
|
Proceeds from settlement of
derivatives
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
Return on capital from equity
investments
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
(6,825
|
)
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
Due to Manager
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
Interest payable, derivative
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
7,876
|
|
|
|
8,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of securities available
for sale
|
|
|
(148,670
|
)
|
|
|
(595,484
|
)
|
Acquisition of interest in other
investments
|
|
|
(35,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of commercial real
estate
|
|
|
(234,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest purchased
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Underwriting costs on available for
sale securities and real estate loans
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
Principal payments on available for
sale securities and real estate loans
|
|
|
124,655
|
|
|
|
111,701
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of available
for sale securities
|
|
|
512,161
|
|
|
|
182,482
|
|
Proceeds from the repayment of real
estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,845
|
|
Net deposits of restricted cash for
investment
|
|
|
(16,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Funding of real estate loans
|
|
|
(14,864
|
)
|
|
|
(6,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
186,856
|
|
|
|
(292,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from junior subordinated
notes held by trust that issued trust preferred securities
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
Payment on settlement of derivatives
|
|
|
(5,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the settlement of
derivatives
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash collateral
payable
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of collateralized debt
obligations
|
|
|
324,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage payable
|
|
|
198,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments on
collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
|
|
(16,290
|
)
|
Net (deposits into) return of
restricted cash
|
|
|
19,562
|
|
|
|
(52,783
|
)
|
Payment of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(6,916
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(16,514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of note payable, related
party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
Net (payments on) proceeds from
repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(733,715
|
)
|
|
|
349,323
|
|
Net (payments on) proceeds from
repurchase agreements, related party
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
40,805
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(191,169
|
)
|
|
|
284,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
39,023
|
|
|
|
21,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$
|
42,586
|
|
|
$
|
21,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
interest
|
|
$
|
43,014
|
|
|
$
|
24,545
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of
noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable on credit default swaps
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared, not yet paid
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
12,707
|
|
Principal paydown receivable
|
|
|
6,417
|
|
|
|
9,394
|
|
Purchase of available for sale
securities not yet settled
|
|
|
80,153
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
Equity investment in trust
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of interest on other
investments
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
References herein to we, us or
our refer to Crystal River Capital, Inc. and its
subsidiaries unless the context specifically requires otherwise.
We are a Maryland corporation that was formed in January 2005
for the purpose of acquiring and originating a diversified
portfolio of commercial and residential real estate structured
finance investments. We commenced operations on March 15,
2005, when we completed an offering of 17,400,000 shares of
common stock (the Private Offering), and we
completed our initial public offering of 7,500,000 shares
of common stock (the Public Offering) on
August 2, 2006, as more fully explained in Note 13. We
are externally managed and are advised by Hyperion Brookfield
Crystal River Capital Advisors, LLC (the Manager) as
more fully explained in Note 11.
We have elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust
(REIT) under the Internal Revenue Code for the 2005
tax year. To maintain our tax status as a REIT, we plan to
distribute at least 90% of our taxable income. In view of our
election to be taxed as a REIT, we have tailored our balance
sheet investment program to originate or acquire loans and
investments to produce a portfolio that meets the asset and
income tests necessary to maintain qualification as a REIT.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Basis of Quarterly PresentationThe accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10,
Rule 10-01
of
Regulation S-X
for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the
financial position, results of operations and changes in cash
flows have been made. These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the annual financial
statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2006 included in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Principles of ConsolidationOur consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Crystal River
Capital, Inc., three wholly-owned subsidiaries created in
connection with our collateralized debt obligations, three
wholly-owned subsidiaries established for financing purposes,
three wholly-owned subsidiaries established to own interests in
real property and our taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS).
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of EstimatesThe preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make a
significant number of estimates in the preparation of the
financial statements. These estimates include determining the
fair market value of certain investments and derivative
liabilities, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment
assumptions, allocation of purchase price to tangible and
intangible assets on property acquisitions, and other items that
affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as
of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses
6
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
during the reported period. It is likely that changes in these
estimates (e.g., market values change due to changes in
supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments, interest
rates, or other reasons; yields change due to changes in credit
outlook and loan prepayments) will occur in the near future. Our
estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results
could differ from our estimates and differences may be material.
Cash and Cash EquivalentsWe classify highly liquid
investments with original maturities of 90 days or less
from the date of purchase as cash equivalents. Cash and cash
equivalents may include cash and short term investments. Short
term investments are stated at cost, which approximates their
fair value, and may consist of investments in money market
accounts.
Restricted CashRestricted cash consists primarily
of funds held on deposit with brokers to serve as collateral for
repurchase agreements, certain interest rate swap agreements and
funds held by the trustee for CDO II (see
Note 6) to fund future purchases of available for sale
securities.
SecuritiesWe invest in U.S. Agency residential
mortgage-backed securities (Agency ARMS), Non-Agency
residential mortgage-backed securities (Non-Agency
RMBS), commercial mortgage-backed securities
(CMBS) and other real estate debt and equity
instruments. We account for our available for sale securities
(Agency ARMS, CMBS, RMBS, asset-backed securities
(ABS) and other real estate and equity instruments)
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
(SFAS 115). We classify our securities as
available for sale because we may dispose of them prior to
maturity in response to changes in the market, liquidity needs
or other events, even though we do not hold the securities for
the purpose of selling them in the near future.
All investments classified as available for sale are reported at
fair value, based on quoted market prices provided by
independent pricing sources, when available, or from quotes
provided by dealers who make markets in certain securities, or
from our managements estimates in cases where the
investments are illiquid. In making these estimates, our
management utilizes pricing information obtained from dealers
who make markets in these securities. However, under certain
circumstances we may adjust these values based on our knowledge
of the securities and the underlying collateral. Our management
also uses a discounted cash flow model, which utilizes
prepayment and loss assumptions based upon historical
experience, economic factors and the characteristics of the
underlying cash flow in order to substantiate the fair value of
the securities. The assumed discount rate is based upon the
yield of comparable securities. The determination of future cash
flows and the appropriate discount rates are inherently
subjective and, as a result, actual results may vary from our
managements estimates.
Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
stockholders equity.
Periodically, all available for sale securities are evaluated
for other than temporary impairment in accordance with
SFAS 115 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets
(EITF 99-20).
An impairment that is an other than temporary
7
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
impairment is a decline in the fair value of an investment
below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate
the decline will not be recovered over the remaining life of the
investment. Other than temporary impairments result in reducing
the carrying value of the security to its fair value through the
statement of income, which also creates a new carrying value for
the investment. We compute a revised yield based on the future
estimated cash flows as described in the section titled
Revenue Recognition below. Significant judgments,
including making assumptions regarding the estimated
prepayments, loss assumptions and the changes in interest rates,
are required in determining impairment.
Real Estate LoansReal estate loans are carried at
cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees,
discounts, repayments, sales of partial interests in loans and
unfunded commitments, unless the loan is deemed to be impaired.
We account for our real estate loans in accordance with
SFAS No. 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and
Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial
Direct Costs of Leases (SFAS 91).
Real estate loans are evaluated for possible impairment on a
periodic basis in accordance with SFAS No. 114,
Accounting by Creditors For Impairment of a Loanan
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 5 and 15
(SFAS 114). Impairment occurs when we
determine it is probable that we will not be able to collect all
amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Upon
determination of impairment, we establish a reserve for loan
losses and recognize a corresponding charge to the statement of
income through a provision for loan losses. Significant
judgments are required in determining impairment, including
making assumptions regarding the value of the loan and the value
of the real estate, partnership interest or other collateral
that secures the loan.
Commercial Real EstateCommercial properties held
for investment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations, upon acquisition, we allocate the
purchase price to the components of the commercial properties
acquired: the amount allocated to land is based on its estimated
fair value; buildings and existing tenant improvements are
recorded at depreciated replacement cost; above- and
below-market in-place operating leases are determined based on
the present value of the difference between the rents payable
under the contractual terms of the leases and estimated market
rents; lease origination costs for in-place operating leases are
determined based on the estimated costs that would be incurred
to put the existing leases in place under the same terms and
conditions; and tenant relationships are measured based on the
present value of the estimated avoided net costs if a tenant
were to renew its lease at expiry, discounted by the probability
of such renewal.
Depreciation on buildings is provided on a straight-line basis
over the useful lives of the properties to a maximum of
40 years. Depreciation is determined with reference to each
rental propertys carried value, remaining estimated useful
life and residual value. Acquired tenant improvements, above-
and below-market in-place operating leases and lease origination
costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
terms of the leases. The value associated with acquired tenant
relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
expected term of the relationships. All other tenant
improvements and re-leasing costs are deferred and amortized on
a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases to which they
relate. Depreciation on buildings and amortization of deferred
leasing costs and tenant
8
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
improvements that are determined to be assets of the company are
recorded in depreciation and amortization expense. All above-and
below-market tenant leases and tenant relationships are
amortized to revenue. Above- and below-market ground leases are
amortized to operating expenses.
Properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. For commercial properties, an impairment loss is
recognized when a propertys carrying value exceeds its
undiscounted future net cash flow. The impairment is measured as
the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated
fair value. Projections of future cash flow take into account
the specific business plan for each property and
managements best estimate of the most probable set of
economic conditions anticipated to prevail in the market.
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
ActivitiesWe account for our derivative and hedging
activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133) and SFAS No. 149,
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS 149).
SFAS 133 and SFAS 149 require us to recognize all
derivative instruments at their fair value as either assets or
liabilities on our balance sheet. The accounting for changes in
fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative
instrument depends on whether we have designated it, and whether
it qualifies, as part of a hedging relationship and on the type
of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that
are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we must
designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being
hedged, as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge of a
net investment in a foreign operation. We have no fair value
hedges or hedges of a net investment in foreign operations as of
March 31, 2007.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to
variability in expected future cash flows that are attributable
to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss
on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings (i.e., in interest expense when the
hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with
floating-rate debt). The remaining gain or loss on the
derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative changes in the
present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any,
is recognized in the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
derivatives in current earnings during the period of change. For
derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments
(including foreign currency swaps and credit default swaps), the
gain or loss is recognized in realized and unrealized gain
(loss) on derivatives in the current earnings during the period
of change. Income
and/or
expense from interest rate swaps are recognized as an adjustment
to interest expense. We account for income and expense from
interest rate swaps on an accrual basis over the period to which
the payments
and/or
receipts relate.
Dividends to StockholdersWe record dividends to
stockholders on the declaration date. The actual dividend and
its timing are at the discretion of our board of directors. We
intend to pay sufficient dividends to avoid incurring any income
or excise tax. During the three months ended March 31,
2007, we declared dividends in the amount of $0.68 per
share of which
9
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
$17,032 was distributed on April 27, 2007 to our
stockholders of record as of March 30, 2007, and of which
$17 related to dividends on deferred stock units.
Offering CostsOffering costs that were incurred in
connection with the Private Offering and the Public Offering are
reflected as a reduction of additional
paid-in-capital.
Certain offering costs that were incurred in connection with the
Public Offering were initially capitalized to prepaid expenses
and other assets and were recorded as a reduction of additional
paid-in-capital
when we completed the Public Offering in August 2006.
Trust Preferred SecuritiesTrusts that we form for
the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities are not
consolidated in our financial statements in accordance with
Financial Interpretation No. 46R (FIN 46R) as we have
determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of such
trusts. Our investment in the common securities of such trusts
is included in other assets in our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue RecognitionInterest income for our
available for sale securities and real estate loans is
recognized over the life of the investment using the effective
interest method and recorded on the accrual basis. Interest
income on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) is
recognized using the effective interest method as required by
EITF 99-20.
Real estate loans generally are originated or purchased at or
near par value, and interest income is recognized based on the
contractual terms of the loan instruments. Any loan fees or
acquisition costs on originated loans or securities are
capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income
over the life of the investment utilizing the straight-line
method, which approximates the effective interest method. None
of the interest income for the three months ended March 31,
2007 or 2006 included prepayment fees.
Under
EITF 99-20,
at the time of purchase, our management estimates the future
expected cash flows and determines the effective interest rate
based on these estimated cash flows and the purchase price. As
needed, we update these estimated cash flows and compute a
revised yield based on the current amortized cost of the
investment. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number
of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties and
contingencies, including the rate and timing of principal
payments (including prepayments, repurchases, defaults and
liquidations), the pass-through or coupon rate and interest rate
fluctuations. In addition, interest payment shortfalls due to
delinquencies on the underlying mortgage loans and the timing
and the magnitude of credit losses on the mortgage loans
underlying the securities have to be judgmentally estimated.
These uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict
and are subject to future events that may impact our
managements estimates and our interest income.
We record security transactions on the trade date. Realized
gains and losses from security transactions are determined based
upon the specific identification method and recorded as gain
(loss) on sale of available for sale securities in the
statements of income.
We account for accretion of discounts or premiums on available
for sale securities and real estate loans using the effective
interest yield method. Such amounts have been included as a
component of interest income in the statements of income.
10
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
We may sell all or a portion of our real estate investments to a
third party. To the extent the fair value received for an
investment differs from the amortized cost of that investment
and control of the asset that is sold is surrendered making it a
true sale, as defined under SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilitiesa replacement of FASB
Statement No. 125 (SFAS 140), a gain
or loss on the sale will be recorded in the statements of income
as realized net gain (loss) on sale of real estate loans. To the
extent a real estate investment is sold that has any fees that
were capitalized at the time the investment was made and were
being recognized over the term of the investment, the
unamortized fees are recognized at the time of sale and included
in any gain or loss on sale of real estate loans.
We have retained substantially all of the risks and benefits of
ownership of our rental properties and therefore we account for
leases with our tenants as operating leases. The total amount of
contractual rent that we receive from operating leases is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease;
and a straight-line or free rent receivable, as applicable, is
recorded for the difference between the rental revenue recorded
and the contractual amount received. In addition to base rent,
the tenants in our commercial real estate properties also pay
substantially all operating costs.
Dividend income on preferred stock is recorded on the dividend
declaration date.
Interest in Equity InvestmentWe account for our
investment in BREF One, LLC, a real estate finance fund, under
the equity method of accounting since we own more than a minor
interest in the fund, but do not unilaterally control the fund
and are not considered to be the primary beneficiary under
FIN 46R. The investment was recorded initially at cost, and
subsequently adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash
contributions and distributions.
Income TaxesWe have elected to be taxed as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding provisions
of state law. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute
at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to stockholders
within the statutory timeframe. Accordingly, we generally will
not be subject to federal or state income tax to the extent that
we make qualifying distributions to our stockholders and
provided we satisfy the REIT requirements, including certain
asset, income, distribution and stock ownership tests. If we
were to fail to meet these requirements, we would be subject to
federal, state and local income taxes, which could have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations and amounts
available for distribution to our stockholders.
The dividends paid deduction of a REIT for qualifying dividends
to our stockholders is computed using our taxable income as
opposed to using our financial statement net income. Some of the
significant differences between financial statement net income
and taxable income include the timing of recording unrealized
gains/realized gains associated with certain assets, the
book/tax basis of assets, interest income, impairment, credit
loss recognition related to certain assets (asset-backed
mortgages), accounting for derivative instruments and stock
compensation and amortization of various costs (including start
up costs).
11
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109), establishes financial
accounting and reporting standards for the effect of income
taxes that result from an organizations activities during
the current and preceding years. SFAS 109 requires that
income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for book and tax purposes. A deferred tax asset or
liability for each temporary difference is determined based upon
the tax rates that the organization expects to be in effect when
the underlying items of income and expense are realized. A
deferred tax valuation allowance is established if it is more
likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
We have a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary that has made a
joint election with us to be treated as our TRS. Our TRS is a
separate entity subject to federal income tax under the Internal
Revenue Code. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, we recorded current income tax expense of $339 (federal
income tax of $215 and state and local income tax of $124) and
$0, respectively, which is included in other expenses. For the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded a
deferred tax benefit of $750 and $0, respectively, which is
included in other expenses. As of March 31, 2007, we had a
deferred tax liability of $150 attributable to mark to market
adjustments on foreign currency swaps held in our TRS which is
included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and cash
collateral payable. As of December 31, 2006 we had a
deferred tax liability of $900 attributable to mark to market
adjustments on foreign currency swaps held in our TRS of $900
which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and cash
collateral payable.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Financial Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, or
FIN 48. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. This
interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This
interpretation was effective January 1, 2007. The adoption
of FIN 48 did not materially affect our consolidated
financial statements.
Our policy for interest and penalties on material uncertain tax
positions recognized in our consolidated financial statements is
to classify these as interest expense and operating expense,
respectively. However, in accordance with FIN 48 we
assessed our tax positions for all open tax years (Federal,
years 2005 to 2006 and State, years 2005 to 2006) as of
March 31, 2007 and concluded that we have no material
FIN 48 liabilities to be recognized at this time.
Deferred Financing CostsDeferred financing costs
represent commitment fees, legal fees and other third party
costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing that
result in a closing of such financing. These costs are amortized
over the terms of the respective agreements using the effective
interest method or a method that approximates the effective
interest method and the amortization is reflected in interest
expense. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when
the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity.
12
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not
close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that
the financing will not close.
Earnings per ShareWe compute basic and diluted
earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128). Basic
earnings per share (EPS) is computed based on net
income divided by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock and other participating securities outstanding
during the period. Diluted EPS is based on net income divided by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus any
additional shares of common stock attributable to stock options,
provided that the options have a dilutive effect. At
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, options to purchase
a total of 130,000 shares of common stock and
126,000 shares of common stock, respectively, have been
excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as they were
determined to be antidilutive.
Variable Interest EntitiesIn January 2003, the FASB
issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest EntitiesAn Interpretation of ARB No. 51
(FIN 46). FIN 46 provides guidance on
identifying entities for which control is achieved through means
other than through voting rights and on determining when and
which business enterprise should consolidate a variable interest
entity (VIE) when such enterprise would be
determined to be the primary beneficiary. In addition,
FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all
other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE
make additional disclosures. In December 2003, the FASB issued a
revision of FIN 46, Interpretation No. 46R
(FIN 46R), to clarify the provisions of
FIN 46. FIN 46R states that a VIE is subject to
consolidation if the investors in the entity being evaluated
under FIN 46R either do not have sufficient equity at risk
for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support, are unable to direct the
entitys activities, or are not exposed to the
entitys losses or entitled to its residual returns. VIEs
within the scope of FIN 46R are required to be consolidated
by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE
is determined to be the party that absorbs a majority of the
VIEs expected losses, receives the majority of the
VIEs expected returns, or both.
Our ownership of the subordinated classes of CMBS and RMBS from
a single issuer may provide us with the right to control the
foreclosure/workout process on the underlying loans, which we
refer to as the Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS. There are
certain exceptions to the scope of FIN 46R, one of which
provides that an investor that holds a variable interest in a
qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) is not
required to consolidate that entity unless the investor has the
unilateral ability to cause the entity to liquidate.
SFAS 140 sets forth the requirements for an entity to
qualify as a QSPE. To maintain the QSPE exception, the
special-purpose entity must initially meet the QSPE criteria and
must continue to satisfy such criteria in subsequent periods. A
special-purpose entitys QSPE status can be affected in
future periods by activities undertaken by its transferor(s) or
other involved parties, including the manner in which certain
servicing activities are performed. To the extent that our CMBS
or RMBS investments were issued by a special-purpose entity that
meets the QSPE requirements, we record those investments at the
purchase price paid. To the extent the underlying
special-purpose entities do not satisfy the QSPE requirements,
we follow the guidance set forth in FIN 46R as the
special-purpose entities would be determined to be VIEs.
13
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
We have analyzed the pooling and servicing agreements governing
each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments for
which we own a greater than 50% interest in the subordinated
class and we believe that the terms of those agreements are
industry standard and are consistent with the QSPE criteria.
However, there is uncertainty with respect to QSPE treatment for
those special-purpose entities due to ongoing review by
regulators and accounting standard setters (including the
FASBs project to amend SFAS 140 and the recently
added FASB project on servicer discretion in a QSPE), potential
actions by various parties involved with the QSPE (discussed in
the paragraph above) and varying and evolving interpretations of
the QSPE criteria under SFAS 140. We also have evaluated
each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments as
if the special-purpose entities that issued such securities are
not QSPEs. Using the fair value approach to calculate expected
losses or residual returns, we have concluded that we would not
be the primary beneficiary of any of the underlying
special-purpose entities. Additionally, the standard setters
continue to review the FIN 46R provisions related to the
computations used to determine the primary beneficiary of VIEs.
Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our investment in
these QSPEs totaled $238,278 as of March 31, 2007.
The financing structures that we offer to the borrowers on
certain of our real estate loans involve the creation of
entities that could be deemed VIEs and therefore, could be
subject to FIN 46R. Our management has evaluated these
entities and has concluded that none of them are VIEs that are
subject to the consolidation rules of FIN 46R.
Stock Based CompensationWe account for stock-based
compensation in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123R), which establishes
accounting and disclosure requirements using fair value based
methods of accounting for stock-based compensation plans.
Compensation expense related to grants of stock and stock
options are recognized over the vesting period of such grants
based on the estimated fair value on the grant date.
Stock compensation awards granted to the Manager and certain
employees of the Managers affiliates are accounted for in
accordance with
EITF 96-18,
Accounting For Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling,
Goods and Services, which requires us to measure the fair
value of the equity instrument using the stock prices and other
measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either the date at
which a performance commitment by the counterparty is reached or
the date at which the counterpartys performance is
complete.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and
UncertaintiesOur investments are primarily
concentrated in MBS that pass through collections of principal
and interest from the underlying mortgages and there is a risk
that some borrowers on the underlying mortgages will default.
Therefore, MBS may bear some exposure to credit losses. Our
maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk if all parties to
the investments failed completely to perform according to the
terms of the contracts as of March 31, 2007 is $2,823,027.
Our real estate loans and other investments may bear some
exposure to credit losses. Our maximum exposure to loss due to
credit risk if parties to the real estate loans, related and
unrelated, and other investments failed completely to perform
according to the terms of the loans as of March 31, 2007 is
$252,680.
14
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
We bear certain other risks typical in investing in a portfolio
of MBS. Principal risks potentially affecting our financial
position, income and cash flows include the risk that
(i) interest rate changes can negatively affect the market
values of our MBS, (ii) interest rate changes can influence
decisions made by borrowers in the mortgages underlying the
securities to prepay those mortgages, which can negatively
affect both the cash flows from, and the market value of, our
MBS and (iii) adverse changes in the market value of our
MBS and/or
our inability to renew short term borrowings would result in the
need to sell securities at inopportune times and cause us to
realize losses.
Other financial instruments that potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents and real estate loans. We place our cash and cash
equivalents in excess of insured amounts with high quality
financial institutions. The collateral securing our real estate
loans and other investments are located in the United States,
Canada and the United Kingdom.
Credit risk also arises from the possibility that tenants may be
unable to fulfill their lease commitments. We have a significant
concentration of rental revenue from both of our commercial
properties given that JPMorgan Chase is the main tenant of both
properties. Therefore, we are subject to concentration of credit
risk, and the inability of this tenant to make its lease
payments could have an adverse effect on us. Our exposure to
this credit risk is mitigated since we have long-term leases in
place for both properties with a tenant that has an investment
grade credit rating.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Comprehensive
income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive
income (loss). Our other comprehensive income (loss) is
comprised primarily of unrealized gains and losses on securities
available for sale and net unrealized and deferred gains and
losses on certain derivative investments accounted for as cash
flow hedges.
Securities Repurchase AgreementsIn securities
repurchase agreements, we transfer securities to a counterparty
under an agreement to repurchase the same securities at a fixed
price in the future. These agreements are accounted for as
secured financing transactions as we maintain effective control
over the transferred securities and the transfer meets the other
criteria for such accounting. The transferred securities are
pledged by us as collateral to the counterparty.
Foreign Currency TransactionsWe conform to the
requirements of SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation (SFAS 52). SFAS 52
requires us to record realized and unrealized gains and losses
from transactions denominated in a currency other than our
functional currency (U.S. dollar) in determining net income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet AdoptedIn
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 clarifies the definition of fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and
requires expanded financial statement disclosures about fair
value measurements for assets and liabilities. SFAS 157
requires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial
instruments according to a fair value hierarchy as defined in
the standard. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal periods
beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS 157 will be
effective for us beginning January 1,
15
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
2008 and we are currently evaluating the effects of
SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities
to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value to improve financial reporting by
providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility
in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. SFAS 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between entities that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007.
SFAS 159 will be effective for us beginning January 1,
2008 and we are currently evaluating the effects of
SFAS 159 on our consolidated financial statements.
PresentationCertain reclassifications have been
made in the presentation of the prior periods consolidated
financial statements to conform to the March 2007 presentation.
|
|
3.
|
AVAILABLE FOR
SALE SECURITIES
|
Our available for sale securities are carried at their estimated
fair values. The amortized cost and estimated fair values of our
available for sale securities as of March 31, 2007 are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Security
Description
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
$
|
497,819
|
|
|
$
|
5,717
|
|
|
$
|
(10,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
Residential MBS-Non-Agency ARMs
|
|
|
279,739
|
|
|
|
6,928
|
|
|
|
(15,962
|
)
|
|
|
270,705
|
|
Residential MBS-Agency ARMs
|
|
|
2,016,019
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
(7,913
|
)
|
|
|
2,010,836
|
|
ABS
|
|
|
42,151
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,162
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
4,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
4,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,840,580
|
|
|
$
|
17,386
|
|
|
$
|
(34,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,823,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We pledge our available for sale securities to secure our
repurchase agreements and collateralized debt obligations. The
fair value of the available for sale securities that we pledged
as collateral as of March 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Pledged as
Collateral:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
For borrowings under repurchase
agreements
|
|
$
|
2,033,419
|
|
For borrowings under
collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
557,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,590,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
3.
|
AVAILABLE FOR
SALE SECURITIES (Continued)
|
The aggregate estimated fair values by underlying credit rating
of our available for sale securities as of March 31, 2007
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Security
Rating
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
2,010,836
|
|
|
|
71.23
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
36,818
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
337,513
|
|
|
|
11.96
|
|
BB
|
|
|
220,478
|
|
|
|
7.81
|
|
B
|
|
|
130,348
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
87,034
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,823,027
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The face amount and net unearned discount on our investments as
of March 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Description:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Face amount
|
|
$
|
3,132,040
|
|
Net unearned discount
|
|
|
(291,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
2,840,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and the three
months ended March 31, 2006, net discount on available for
sale securities accreted into interest income totaled $3,201 and
$1,997, respectively.
Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities
(CMBS)Our investments include CMBS, which
are mortgage backed securities that are secured by, or evidence
ownership interests in, a single commercial mortgage loan, or a
partial or entire pool of mortgage loans secured by commercial
properties. The securities may be senior, subordinated,
investment grade or non-investment grade.
17
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
3.
|
AVAILABLE FOR
SALE SECURITIES (Continued)
|
The following is a summary of our CMBS investments as of
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Security
Rating
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Term
(yrs)
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
254,124
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
(5,204
|
)
|
|
|
250,766
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
|
|
9.55
|
|
BB
|
|
|
124,246
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
(2,608
|
)
|
|
|
121,809
|
|
|
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
9.65
|
|
B
|
|
|
65,593
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
(1,867
|
)
|
|
|
65,609
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
|
|
|
11.61
|
|
|
|
10.89
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
53,856
|
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
55,122
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
16.53
|
|
|
|
11.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CMBS
|
|
$
|
497,819
|
|
|
$
|
5,717
|
|
|
$
|
(10,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Backed Securities
(RMBS)Our investments include RMBS, which
are securities that represent participations in, and are secured
by or payable from, mortgage loans secured by residential
property. Our RMBS investments include (i) Agency mortgage
pass-through certificates, which are securities issued or
guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association
(Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(Freddie Mac) or Government National Mortgage
Association (Ginnie Mae), (ii) Agency
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued by Fannie Mae or
Freddie Mac backed by mortgage pass-through securities and
evidenced by a series of bonds or certificates issued in
multiple classes (collectively, Agency Adjustable Rate
RMBS or Agency ARMS) and (iii) Non-Agency
pass-through certificates which are rated classes in senior/
subordinated structures (Non-Agency RMBS).
The following is a summary of our Non-Agency RMBS investments as
of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Security
Rating
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Term
(yrs)
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
28,857
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(1,609
|
)
|
|
|
27,288
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
|
|
|
7.84
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
57,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
52,115
|
|
|
|
6.96
|
|
|
|
9.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
103,739
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
(7,601
|
)
|
|
|
96,701
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
B
|
|
|
61,747
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
64,739
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
20.64
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
28,140
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
29,862
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
37.89
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Agency RMBS
|
|
$
|
279,739
|
|
|
$
|
6,928
|
|
|
$
|
(15,962
|
)
|
|
$
|
270,705
|
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
17.61
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
3.
|
AVAILABLE FOR
SALE SECURITIES (Continued)
|
The following is a summary of our Agency ARMS investments as of
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Security
Rating
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Term
(yrs)
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
2,016,019
|
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
|
$
|
(7,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,010,836
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency ARMS
|
|
$
|
2,016,019
|
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
|
$
|
(7,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,010,836
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities (ABS)As of
March 31, 2007, we invested in asset-backed securities with
an estimated fair value of $44,162. Aircraft ABS generally are
collateralized by aircraft leases. Issuers of consumer and
aircraft ABS generally are special-purpose entities owned or
sponsored by banks and finance companies, captive finance
subsidiaries of non-financial corporations or specialized
originators such as credit card lenders.
The following is a summary of our ABS investments as of
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Security
Rating
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Term
(yrs)
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
8.19
|
|
|
|
11.96
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
32,916
|
|
|
|
1,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,632
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
9.17
|
|
|
|
17.75
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ABS
|
|
$
|
42,151
|
|
|
$
|
2,011
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,162
|
|
|
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
8.96
|
|
|
|
16.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other SecuritiesWe invested in the preferred stock
of Millerton I CDO with an estimated fair value of $1,968 as of
March 31, 2007, and the preferred stock of
Millerton II CDO with an estimated fair value of $2,050 as
of March 31, 2007. The preferred stock of Millerton I CDO
was rated Ba3 and the preferred stock of Millerton II CDO
was not rated at March 31, 2007.
19
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
3.
|
AVAILABLE FOR
SALE SECURITIES (Continued)
|
Unrealized LossesThe following table sets forth the
amortized cost, fair value and unrealized loss for securities we
owned as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Security
Rating
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
1,113,721
|
|
|
$
|
1,105,808
|
|
|
$
|
(7,913
|
)
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
26,357
|
|
|
|
24,748
|
|
|
|
(1,609
|
)
|
BBB
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
198,076
|
|
|
|
187,732
|
|
|
|
(10,344
|
)
|
BB
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
193,613
|
|
|
|
183,020
|
|
|
|
(10,593
|
)
|
B
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
57,974
|
|
|
|
55,192
|
|
|
|
(2,782
|
)
|
Not rated
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
19,473
|
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
(1,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
1,609,214
|
|
|
$
|
1,574,275
|
|
|
$
|
(34,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses on all securities were the result of
changes in market interest rates subsequent to their purchase.
The unrealized losses on non-rated bonds were also due to market
conditions and price volatility. Because we have the ability and
intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value,
which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to
be other than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2007.
Other Than Temporary ImpairmentsFor the three
months ended March 31, 2007, we determined that four RMBS
securities were impaired. In connection with the impairment of
these securities, we recorded impairment charges of $635 in our
statement of income for the three months ended March 31,
2007 that has been reclassified out of other comprehensive
income. As of March 31, 2006, we held four Agency ARMS
securities that we determined to be impaired. As a result, we
recorded an impairment charge of $1,258 in our statement of
income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 that was
reclassified out of other comprehensive income.
Sale of Available for Sale SecuritiesDuring the
three months ended March 31, 2007, we sold 11 securities
for proceeds of $393,501 and realized a gain of $1,682 and we
sold 4 securities for proceeds of $118,660 and realized a
loss of $62. During the three months ended March 31, 2006,
we sold one security for proceeds of $3,263 and realized a gain
of $327, we sold five securities for proceeds of $179,219 and
realized a loss of $895.
We invest in mezzanine loans, B Notes, construction loans and
whole loans. A mezzanine loan is a loan that is subordinated to
a first mortgage loan on a property and is senior to the
borrowers equity in the properties. Mezzanine loans are
made to the propertys owner and are secured by pledges of
ownership interests in the property
and/or the
property owner. The mezzanine lender can foreclose on the
pledged interests and thereby succeed to ownership of the
property subject to the lien of the first mortgage.
20
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
4.
|
REAL ESTATE
LOANS (Continued)
|
A subordinated commercial real estate loan, which we refer to as
a B Note, may be rated by at least one nationally recognized
rating agency. A B Note is typically a privately negotiated loan
that is secured by a first mortgage on a single large commercial
property or group of related properties; and is subordinated to
an A Note secured by the same first mortgage on the same
property.
A construction loan represents a participation in a construction
or rehabilitation loan on a commercial property that generally
provides 85% to 90% of total project costs and is secured by a
first lien mortgage on the property. Alternatively, mezzanine
loans can be used to finance construction or rehabilitation
where the security is subordinate to the first mortgage lien.
Construction loans and mezzanine loans used to finance
construction or rehabilitation generally would provide fees and
interest income at risk-adjusted rates.
A whole mortgage loan is a loan secured by a first lien mortgage
that provides mortgage financing to commercial and residential
property owners and developers. Generally, mortgage loans have
maturities that range from three to 10 years for commercial
properties and up to 30 years for residential properties.
The following is a summary of our real estate loans as of
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Face
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Years to
|
|
Loan
Type
|
|
of
Loans
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whole loans
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
198,942
|
|
|
$
|
200,401
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
11/2009-7/2021
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
20,378
|
|
|
|
20,382
|
|
|
|
11.47
|
|
|
|
11/2007-7/2008
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Mezzanine loans
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
31,923
|
|
|
|
31,897
|
|
|
|
9.84
|
|
|
|
7/2008-8/2016
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
251,243
|
|
|
$
|
252,680
|
|
|
|
6.96
|
|
|
|
11/2007-7/2021
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whole loans
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
198,942
|
|
|
$
|
200,605
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
11/2009-7/2021
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
20,052
|
|
|
|
20,056
|
|
|
|
11.48
|
|
|
|
11/2007-7/2008
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Mezzanine loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
16,923
|
|
|
|
17,009
|
|
|
|
9.75
|
|
|
|
7/2008-2/2016
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
235,917
|
|
|
$
|
237,670
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
11/2007-7/2021
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying values of our loans as of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 include unamortized underwriting fees of
$202 and $180, respectively.
The maturities of our real estate loans as of March 31,
2007 are as follows: $12,440 in 2007, $22,245 in 2008, $8,037 in
2009, $41,893 in 2010, $5,276 in 2011 and $161,352 thereafter.
In 2005, we originated a $9,450 mezzanine construction loan to
develop luxury residential condominiums in Portland, Oregon. The
loan provides for an aggregate of $6,695 of advances for
construction costs and $2,755 for capitalized interest on the
outstanding loan balance. The loan bears interest at an annual
rate of 16% and has a maturity date of November 2007, which
21
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
4.
|
REAL ESTATE
LOANS (Continued)
|
can be extended at the borrowers option, subject to
satisfying certain conditions, until May 2008. Under the
agreement governing the terms of the loan, interest on the loan
was paid in cash through March 2006, and was capitalized
thereafter. As of March 31, 2007, we have made advances of
$8,385, including capitalized interest of $1,489.
Currently, the projected total costs to complete the project
have increased from $41,400 to $58,600, including capitalized
interest. Of the 70 units available, 50 units have
been sold subject to scheduled completion dates, which are not
expected to be met. We have commenced negotiations with the
senior lender and the developer regarding the developers
need to obtain additional financing to cover these additional
construction costs.
We have evaluated the financial merits of the project by
reviewing the projected unit sales, estimating construction
costs and evaluating other collateral available to us under the
terms of the loan. Our management believes that it is probable
that the entire loan balance, including the capitalized
interest, will be recovered through the satisfaction of future
cash flows from sales and other available collateral.
Accordingly, we have not recorded any impairment related to this
loan. We will continue to monitor the status of this loan.
However, housing prices, in particular condominium prices, may
fall, unit sales may lag projections and construction costs may
increase, all of which may increase the risk of impairment to
our loan. No assurance can be given that this loan will not be
impaired in the future depending on the outcome of the future
negotiations with the senior lender and the borrower and the
borrowers ability to complete the project without
additional cost overruns. In the event that we determine that it
is probable that we will not be able to recover the total
contractual amount of principal and interest due on this loan,
the loan would be impaired.
We pledge our real estate loans to secure our repurchase
agreements and collateralized debt obligations. The fair value
of the real estate loans that we pledged as collateral as of
March 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Pledged as
Collateral:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
For borrowings under repurchase
agreements
|
|
$
|
159,889
|
|
For borrowings under
collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
177,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, our real estate loans included
non-U.S. dollar
denominated assets with a carrying value of $43,328.
5. COMMERCIAL
REAL ESTATE
On March 20, 2007, we acquired two properties located in
Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona totaling approximately
428,600 and 724,000 square feet, respectively, for an
aggregate purchase price of $234,710. Both properties are leased
on a triple net basis to one tenant under leases that expire in
2021. In addition to the sale and purchase agreement, we entered
into rent enhancement agreements with the seller under which we
will receive payments through 2015 totaling $15,905. The present
value of such payments is recorded as other receivables totaling
22
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
5.
|
COMMERCIAL REAL
ESTATE (Continued)
|
$13,617 on our balance sheet as of March 31, 2007, which
partially offsets the below-market lease terms.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated based on
estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition, pending the completion of an
independent appraisal relating to certain of the lease
origination costs included in intangible assets, which we
anticipate to be completed in the second quarter of 2007.
Accordingly, the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed could differ from the amounts presented currently in our
consolidated financial statements. We do not expect the final
allocation to be materially different from that presented below.
The following is a summary of the amounts preliminarily assigned
to each major class of asset and liability at the date of
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
211,119
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
83,535
|
|
Intangible liabilities
|
|
|
(73,541
|
)
|
Rent enhancement receivable
|
|
|
13,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
234,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The transaction was financed with a $198,500 mortgage loan that
bears interest at an annual rate of 5.509% (hedged rate 5.65%)
and matures on April 1, 2017. We incurred financing costs
of $186, which have been deferred and are being amortized over
the term of the loan.
The following is a schedule of future minimum rent payments to
be received under the leases at the two properties acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent
Payments
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
7,311
|
|
2008
|
|
|
9,943
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,142
|
|
2010
|
|
|
10,344
|
|
2011
|
|
|
10,551
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
114,629
|
|
The components of intangible assets and their respective
weighted average lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
Lease origination costs
|
|
$
|
80,819
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Below-market ground lease
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
83,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
5.
|
COMMERCIAL REAL
ESTATE (Continued)
|
As of March 31, 2007, the components of intangible assets
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Lease origination costs
|
|
$
|
80,666
|
|
Below-market ground lease
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
83,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amortization of these intangible assets for the
next five years is $4,207 for the remainder of 2007, $5,609 in
2008, $5,609 in 2009, $5,609 in 2010 and $5,609 in 2011.
Below market leases, net of amortization, which are classified
as intangible liabilities, are $73,403 as of March 31,
2007. The estimated amortization for the next five years is
$3,797 for the remainder of 2007, $5,062 in 2008, $5,062 in
2009, $5,062 in 2010 and $5,062 in 2011.
|
|
6.
|
DEBT AND OTHER
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
|
The following is a summary of our debt as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
1,989,928
|
|
Repurchase agreements, related
party
|
|
|
124,806
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
516,895
|
|
Mortgage payable
|
|
|
198,500
|
|
Junior subordinated notes held by
trust that issued trust preferred securities
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
$
|
2,881,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase AgreementsAs of March 31, 2007, we
had entered into master repurchase agreements with various
counterparties to finance our asset purchases on a short term
basis. Under these agreements, we sell our assets to the
counterparties and agree to repurchase those assets on a date
certain at a repurchase price generally equal to the original
sales price plus accrued interest. The counterparties will
purchase each asset financed under the facility at a percentage
of the assets value on the date of origination, which is
the purchase rate, and we will pay interest to the counterparty
at short term interest rates (usually based on one-month LIBOR)
plus a pricing spread. We have agreed to a schedule of purchase
rates and pricing spreads with these counterparties that
generally are based upon the class and credit rating of the
asset being financed. The facilities are recourse to us. For
financial reporting purposes, we characterize all of the
borrowings under these facilities as balance sheet financing
transactions.
Under the repurchase agreements, we are required to maintain
adequate collateral with these counterparties. If the market
value of the collateral we have pledged declines, then the
counterparty may require us to provide additional collateral to
secure our obligations under the repurchase agreement. As of
March 31, 2007, we were required to provide additional
collateral in the amount of $47,543, which is included in
restricted cash on the balance sheet.
24
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
6.
|
DEBT AND OTHER
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
|
As of March 31, 2007, we had repurchase agreements
outstanding in the amount of $2,114,734 with a weighted average
borrowing rate of 5.50%. As of March 31, 2007, the
repurchase agreements had remaining weighted average maturities
of 37 days and are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
|
Range
|
|
Repurchase
Counterparty
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(days)
|
|
|
Related Party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trilon International, Inc.
|
|
$
|
124,806
|
|
|
$
|
159,889
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
13-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrelated
Parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
|
210,891
|
|
|
|
210,237
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
%
|
|
|
5-46
|
|
Bear, Stearns & Co.
Inc.
|
|
|
130,426
|
|
|
|
130,731
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
5-46
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
266,196
|
|
|
|
273,776
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
%
|
|
|
39-75
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
|
|
|
206,577
|
|
|
|
208,165
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5-75
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
345,970
|
|
|
|
350,054
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
24-53
|
|
Greenwich Capital Markets,
Inc.
|
|
|
233,310
|
|
|
|
240,849
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
%
|
|
|
12-75
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
|
|
9,310
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
140,864
|
|
|
|
150,850
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
12-75
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated
|
|
|
241,131
|
|
|
|
243,816
|
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
24-53
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co.,
Incorporated
|
|
|
189,588
|
|
|
|
197,213
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
12-39
|
|
WaMu Capital Corp.
|
|
|
17,850
|
|
|
|
18,417
|
|
|
|
5.61
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,989,928
|
|
|
|
2,033,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,114,734
|
|
|
$
|
2,193,307
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, the maturity ranges of our
outstanding repurchase agreements segregated by our available
for sale securities and real estate loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to
30 days
|
|
|
31 to 90
days
|
|
|
Over
90 days
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Agency RMBS
|
|
$
|
781,049
|
|
|
$
|
1,112,478
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,893,527
|
|
Non-agency RMBS
|
|
|
23,270
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,169
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,455
|
|
CDO
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
ABS
|
|
|
14,982
|
|
|
|
23,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,652
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
124,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
951,232
|
|
|
$
|
1,163,502
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,114,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2005, we entered into a $200,000 Master Repurchase
Agreement (the Master Repurchase Agreement) with
Wachovia Bank (the Bank). The Master Repurchase
Agreement is for a two year term (expires August 2007) with
a one year renewal option at the Banks
25
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
6.
|
DEBT AND OTHER
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
|
discretion. Subject to the terms and conditions thereof, the
Master Repurchase Agreement provides for the purchase, sale and
repurchase of commercial and residential mortgage loans,
commercial mezzanine loans, B Notes, participation interests in
the foregoing, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
mutually agreed upon collateral and bears interest at varying
rates over LIBOR based upon the type of asset included in the
repurchase obligation. In November 2005, the Bank increased the
borrowing capacity to $275,000. As of March 31, 2007, the
unused amount under the Master Repurchase Agreement was $275,000.
Collateralized Debt Obligations
(CDOs)In November 2005, we issued
approximately $377,904 of CDOs through two newly-formed
subsidiaries, Crystal River CDO
2005-1, Ltd.
(the 2005 Issuer) and Crystal River CDO
2005-1 LLC
(the 2005 Co-Issuer). The CDO consists of $227,500
of investment grade notes and $67,750 of non-investment grade
notes, each with a final contractual maturity date of March
2046, which were co-issued by the 2005 Issuer and the 2005
Co-Issuer, and $82,654 of preference shares, which were issued
by the 2005 Issuer. We retained all of the non-investment grade
securities, the preference shares and the common shares in the
2005 Issuer. The 2005 Issuer holds assets, consisting primarily
of whole loans, CMBS and RMBS securities, which serve as
collateral for the CDO. Investment grade notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $217,500 were issued with floating coupons
with a combined weighted average interest rate of three-month
LIBOR plus 0.58%. In addition, $10,000 of investment grade notes
were issued with a fixed coupon rate of 6.02%. The CDO may be
replenished, pursuant to certain rating agency guidelines
relating to credit quality and diversification, with substitute
collateral for loans that are repaid during the first five years
of the CDO. Thereafter, the CDO securities will be retired in
sequential order from the senior-most to junior-most as loans
are repaid. We incurred approximately $5,906 of issuance costs,
which is amortized over the average life of the CDO. The 2005
Issuer and 2005 Co-Issuer are consolidated in our financial
statements. The investment grade notes are treated as a secured
financing, and are non recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of
the investment grade notes issued were used to repay outstanding
debt under our repurchase agreements. As of March 31, 2007,
the CDO was collateralized by available for sale securities with
a carrying value of $247,965 and real estate loans with a
carrying value of $18,004.
In January 2007, we issued approximately $390,338 of CDOs
(CDO II) through two newly-formed subsidiaries,
Crystal River Capital Resecuritization
2006-1 Ltd.
(the 2006 Issuer) and Crystal River Capital
Resecuritization
2006-1 LLC
(the 2006 Co-Issuer). CDO II consists of
$324,956 of investment grade notes and $14,638 of non-investment
grade notes, which were co-issued by the 2006 Issuer and the
2006 Co-Issuer, and $19,517 of non-investment grade notes and
$31,227 of preference shares, which were issued by the 2006
Issuer. The 2006 Issuer initially held cash totaling $58,600
that was designated for the future funding of additional
investments. As of March 31, 2007, $16,498 of such cash
remained uninvested and is reflected as restricted cash on our
consolidated balance sheet. We retained all of the
non-investment grade securities, the preference shares and the
common shares in the 2006 Issuer. The 2006 Issuer holds assets,
consisting of CMBS securities, which serve as collateral for
CDO II. Investment grade notes in the aggregate principal
amount of $324,956 were issued with floating coupons with a
combined weighted average interest rate of three-month LIBOR
plus 0.57%. We incurred approximately $6,006 of issuance costs,
which will be amortized over the average life of CDO II.
The 2006 Issuer and the 2006 Co-Issuer are consolidated in our
financial
26
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
6.
|
DEBT AND OTHER
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
|
statements. The investment grade notes are treated as a secured
financing, and are non recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of
the investment grade notes issued were used to repay outstanding
debt under our repurchase agreements. CDO II was
collateralized by available for sale securities. As of
March 31, 2007, CDO II was collateralized by available
for sale securities with a fair value of $309,182.
Junior Subordinated Notes Held by Trust that Issued
Trust Preferred SecuritiesIn March 2007, we
formed Crystal River Preferred Trust I
(Trust I) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred
securities. In March 2007, Trust I issued $50,000 of trust
preferred securities to an unaffiliated investor and $1,550 of
trust common securities to us for $1,550. The combined proceeds
were invested by Trust I in $51,550 of junior subordinated
notes issued by us. The junior subordinated notes are the sole
assets of Trust I and mature in April 2037, but are
callable by us at par on or after April 2012. Interest is
payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.68% (ten-year LIBOR plus
2.75%) through April 2012 and thereafter at a floating rate
equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Mortgage PayableIn March 2007, we financed a
portion of our purchase of two office buildings located in
Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona, with a $198,500 mortgage
loan that bears interest at an annual rate of 5.509% and matures
on April 1, 2017. The mortgage provides for payments of
interest only throughout the term of the loan and the entire
principal is due at maturity. We incurred financing costs of
$186, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the
term of the loan.
Revolving Credit FacilityIn March 2006, we entered
into an unsecured credit facility with Signature Bank that
provides for borrowings of up to $31,000 in the aggregate. The
credit facility expires in March 2009. The credit facility
provides for monthly repayments of all amounts due. Borrowings
under the credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to the
banks prime interest rate or 1.75% over LIBOR. We had no
amounts outstanding under this credit facility at March 31,
2007.
Restrictive Covenants and MaturitiesCertain of our
repurchase agreements and our revolving credit facility contain
financial covenants, including maintaining our REIT status and
maintaining a specific net asset value or worth. We were in
compliance with all our financial covenants as of
December 31, 2006. As of March 31, 2007, with respect
to one debt obligation, we failed to meet one financial
covenant. We obtained a waiver with respect to the financial
covenant that was not met. As a result, we were in compliance
with or have obtained the necessary waivers with respect to all
our financial covenants as of March 31, 2007.
27
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
6.
|
DEBT AND OTHER
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)
|
Interest ExpenseInterest expense is comprised of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest on repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
34,899
|
|
|
$
|
25,716
|
|
Interest on interest rate swap
agreements
|
|
|
(2,866
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
Interest on CDO notes
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
Interest on revolving credit
facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Interest on notes payable, related
party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing
costs
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Other
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
$
|
40,135
|
|
|
$
|
28,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest on repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
16,004
|
|
|
$
|
18,530
|
|
Interest on CDO notes
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Other
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest payable
|
|
$
|
17,583
|
|
|
$
|
19,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
We invest in real estate construction loans. We had outstanding
commitments to fund real estate construction loans in the
aggregate of $24,050 as of March 31, 2007. At
March 31, 2007, we had made advances totaling $22,387 under
these commitments.
In January 2007, we made a $28,462 investment in a private
equity fund that invests in real estate investments. The fund is
managed by an affiliate of our Manager and the investment was
approved by the independent members of our board of directors.
In connection with that investment, we agreed to a future
capital commitment of $10,392. In March 2007, we funded $6,542
of such commitment. As of March 31, 2007, the unfunded
commitment totaled $3,850.
|
|
8.
|
RISK MANAGEMENT
TRANSACTIONS
|
Our objectives in using derivatives include reducing our
exposure to interest expense movements through our use of
interest rate swaps, reducing our exposure to foreign currency
movements through our use of foreign currency swaps, and
generating additional yield for investing through our use of
credit default swaps.
28
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
8.
|
RISK MANAGEMENT
TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
The fair value of our derivatives at March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Derivative Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
13,410
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Foreign currency swaps
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
Credit default swaps
|
|
|
1,630
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
Interest receivableswap
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets
|
|
$
|
14,195
|
|
|
$
|
20,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
2,704
|
|
|
$
|
2,448
|
|
Foreign currency swaps
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
Credit default swaps
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payableswap
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
7,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
17,137
|
|
|
$
|
11,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notional amount of our interest rate swap open positions and
interest rate cap open positions as of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps on reverse
repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
1,215,433
|
|
|
$
|
1,285,433
|
|
Interest rate caps on reverse
repurchase agreements
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Interest rate swaps on CDO notes
|
|
|
51,494
|
|
|
|
52,069
|
|
Interest rate swaps on CDO II
notes
|
|
|
240,467
|
|
|
|
240,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,707,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,777,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had
unhedged repurchase agreements totaling $699,301 and $1,383,016,
respectively.
The change in unrealized gains (loss) in interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedges is separately disclosed in the
statement of changes in stockholders equity. As of
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, unrealized gains
aggregating $5,053 and $7,169, respectively, on cash flow hedges
were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
The net realized losses on settled swaps for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 were $2,738
and $0, respectively, and are being amortized into income
through interest expense. As of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, the amount of net realized gains on
settled swaps amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into income was $390 and $310, respectively.
29
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
8.
|
RISK MANAGEMENT
TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
The components of realized and unrealized (loss) gain on
derivatives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on credit
default swaps (CDS)
|
|
$
|
(5,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,642
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign
currency swaps (FCS)
|
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on hedge
ineffectiveness
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on economic
hedges not designated for hedge accounting
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
Realized loss on settlement of
swaps
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Premium earned from CDS
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized (loss)
gain on derivatives
|
|
$
|
(8,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we were
required to provide additional collateral in respect of our
interest rate swaps in the amount of $12,378 and $17,408,
respectively, which is included in restricted cash on the
balance sheet.
As of March 31, 2007, we held various credit default swaps,
as the protection seller, with notional amount of $160,000. A
credit default swap (CDS) is a financial instrument
used to transfer the credit risk of a reference entity from one
party to another for a specified period of time. In a standard
CDS contract, one party, referred to as the protection buyer,
purchases credit default protection from another party, referred
to as the protection seller, for a specific notional amount of
obligations of a reference entity. In these transactions, the
protection buyer pays a premium to the protection seller. The
premium generally is paid monthly in arrears, but may be paid in
full up front in the case of a CDS with a short maturity.
Generally, if a credit event occurs during the term of the CDS,
the protection seller pays the protection buyer the notional
amount and takes delivery of the reference entitys
obligation. CDS are generally unconditional, irrevocable and
non-cancelable.
|
|
9.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
|
In March 2005, we completed the Private Offering in which we
sold 17,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, at an offering price of $25 per share, including the
purchase of 400,000 shares of common stock by the initial
purchasers/placement agents pursuant to an over-allotment
option. We received proceeds from these transactions in the
amount of $405,613, net of underwriting commissions, placement
agent fees and other offering costs totaling $29,387. In August
2006, we completed the Public Offering in which we sold
7,500,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of
$23 per share. The proceeds received from the Public
Offering were $158,599, which was net of underwriting and other
offering costs of $13,901. Each share of common stock entitles
its holder to one vote per share. Officers, directors and
entities affiliated with our Manager owned 1,996,967 shares
of our common stock as of March 31, 2007.
In March 2005, we adopted a Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
Plan) which provides for awards under the Plan in
the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
and
30
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
9.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
PLAN (Continued)
|
unrestricted stock awards, restricted stock units, deferred
stock units and other performance awards. Our Manager and our
officers, employees, directors, advisors and consultants who
provide services to us are eligible to receive awards under the
Plan. The Plan has a term of 10 years and, based on awards
since adoption, limits awards through December 31, 2007 to
a maximum of 2,502,180 shares of common stock. For
subsequent periods, the maximum number of shares of common stock
that may be subject to awards granted under the Plan can
increase by 10% of the difference between the number of shares
of common stock outstanding at the end of the current calendar
year and the prior calendar year. In no event will the total
number of shares that can be issued under the Plan exceed
10,000,000.
In connection with the Plan, a total of 84,000 shares of
restricted common stock and 126,000 stock options (exercise
price of $25 per share) were granted to our Manager in
March 2005. The Manager subsequently transferred these shares
and options to certain of its officers and employees, certain of
our directors and other individuals associated with our Manager
who provide services to us. The restrictions on the restricted
common stock lapse and full rights of ownership vest for
one-third of the restricted shares and options on each of the
first three anniversary dates of issuance. Vesting is predicated
on the continuing involvement of our Manager in providing
services to us. In addition, 3,500 shares of unrestricted
stock were granted to the independent members of our board of
directors in March 2005 in lieu of cash remunerations. The
independent members of our board of directors fully vested in
the shares on the date of grant.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we did not
issue any shares of restricted common stock. In addition, for
the three months ended March 31, 2007, we have issued 3,017
deferred stock units to certain independent members of our board
of directors. Of this amount, 2,495 deferred stock units were
issued in lieu of cash remunerations. These independent members
of our board of directors fully vested in these units at the
date of grant.
The fair value of unvested shares of the restricted stock issued
to our Manager, directors and employees of our Managers
affiliates as of March 31, 2007 was $1,351 and the fair
value of unvested stock options granted as of March 31,
2007 was $145 ($3.35 per share). For the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, $319 and $242
respectively, was expensed relating to the amortization of the
restricted stock and the stock options. For the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, $120 and $96,
respectively, was expensed relating to the amortization of
deferred stock units.
The Binomial option pricing model was used for pricing our stock
options with the following assumptions as of March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Strike price
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
10.13
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Expected life of options
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
31
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
9.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
PLAN (Continued)
|
Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Our
stock options have characteristics that are significantly
different from those of traded options and changes in the
subjective input assumptions could materially affect the fair
value estimate.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 was comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on available
for sale securities
|
|
$
|
(17,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34,863
|
)
|
Net realized and unrealized gains
on interest rate swap and cap agreements accounted for as cash
flow hedges
|
|
|
4,408
|
|
|
|
21,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(13,145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to various risks, including credit, interest rate
and market risk. We are subject to interest rate risk to the
extent that our interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price
at different speeds, or different bases, than our
interest-earning assets. Credit risk is the risk of default on
our investments that results in a counterpartys failure to
make payments according to the terms of the contract.
Market risk reflects changes in the value of the securities and
real estate loans due to changes in interest rates or other
market factors, including the rate of prepayments of principal
and the value of the collateral underlying our available for
sale securities and real estate loans.
As of March 31, 2007, the mortgage loans in the underlying
collateral pools for all securities we owned were secured by
properties predominantly in California (20%), Florida (9%),
Arizona (7%), Texas (6%) and New York (5%). All other states are
individually less than 5% as of March 31, 2007.
|
|
11.
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
We have entered into a management agreement, as amended (the
Agreement), with our Manager. The initial term of
the Agreement expires in December 2008. After the initial term,
the Agreement will be automatically renewed for a one-year term
each anniversary date thereafter unless we or our Manager
terminate the Agreement. The Agreement provides that our Manager
will provide us with investment management services and certain
administrative services and will perform our
day-to-day
operations. The monthly base management fee for such services is
equal to 1.5% of one-twelfth of our equity, as defined in the
Agreement, payable in arrears.
In addition, under the Agreement, our Manager earns a quarterly
incentive fee equal to 25% of the amount by which the quarterly
net income per share, as defined in the Agreement (which
principally excludes the effect of stock compensation and the
unrealized change in
32
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
11.
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
derivatives), exceeds an amount equal to the product of the
weighted average of the price per share of the common stock we
issued in the Private Offering and in the Public Offering and
the price per share of common stock in any subsequent offerings
by us, multiplied by the higher of (i) 2.4375% or
(ii) 25% of the then applicable 10 year Treasury note
rate plus 0.50%, multiplied by the then weighted average number
of outstanding shares for the quarter. The incentive fee is paid
quarterly. The Agreement provides that 10% of the incentive
management fee is to be paid in shares of our common stock
(providing that such payment does not result in our Manager
owning directly or indirectly more than 9.8% of our issued and
outstanding common stock) and the balance is to be paid in cash.
Our Manager may, at its sole discretion, elect to receive a
greater percentage of its incentive management fee in shares of
our common stock. The incentive management fees included in our
consolidated statements of income that were incurred during the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006
were $124 and $0, respectively.
The Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at
least two-thirds of the independent members of our board of
directors after the expiration of the initial term and by
providing at least 180 days prior notice based upon either:
(i) unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is
materially detrimental to us, or (ii) a determination by
the independent members of our board of directors that the
management fees payable to our Manager are not fair (subject to
our Managers right to prevent a compensation termination
by agreeing to a mutually acceptable reduction of the management
fees). If we terminate the Agreement, then we must pay our
Manager a termination fee equal to twice the sum of the average
annual base and incentive fees earned by our Manager during the
two twelve-month periods immediately preceding the date of
termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently
completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination.
We issued to our Manager 84,000 shares of our restricted
common stock and granted options to purchase 126,000 shares
of our common stock for a 10 year period at a price of
$25 per share in March 2005. We issued to one of our
executive officers 30,000 shares of restricted common stock
in March 2006. The restricted stock and the options vest over a
three-year period. We issued to one of our directors
2,000 shares of restricted stock in November 2006 that vest
on the first anniversary of the date of issuance. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, the
base management expense was $2,050 and $1,455, respectively.
Included in the management fee expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 is $303 and
$222, respectively, of amortization of stock-based compensation
related to restricted stock and options granted.
The Agreement provides that we are required to reimburse our
Manager for certain expenses incurred by our Manager on our
behalf provided that such costs and reimbursements are no
greater than that which would be paid to outside professionals
or consultants on an arms length basis. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, we did
not incur any reimbursable costs due to our Manager.
In January 2007, we purchased a $28,462 investment in BREF One,
LLC (the Fund), a real estate finance fund sponsored
by Brookfield Asset Management, and incurred a $10,392 unfunded
capital commitment to the Fund. The acquisition was made from
two subsidiaries of Brookfield Asset Management. As of
March 31, 2007, we had an unfunded capital commitment
33
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
11.
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
|
of $3,850 to the Fund. In addition, income from the equity
investment in the Fund for the three months ended March 31,
2007 was $849.
In February 2007, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement
with BREOF BNK Fannin LP and BREOF BNK Phoenix LLC to acquire
two commercial properties as described in Note 5 to these
financial statements for a total value of $235,805. We paid the
purchase price for the properties with the proceeds from a
$198,500 mortgage loan from an external lender that bears
interest at an annual rate of 5.509% and matures on
April 1, 2017 and with available cash. In addition to the
sale and purchase agreement, we entered into rent enhancement
agreements with BREOF BNK Fannin LP and BREOF BNK Phoenix LLC
under which we will receive monthly rent enhancement payments
through 2015 totaling $15,905.
The following amounts from related party transactions are
included in our income statement for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest income from real estate
loans to related parties
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
Interest expense on indebtedness
to related parties
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Interest income from rent
enhancement receivables from related parties
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from equity investment in
private investment fund managed by related party
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following amounts from related party transactions are
included in our balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Real estate loans to related
parties
|
|
$
|
43,327
|
|
|
$
|
42,885
|
|
Interest receivable from real
estate loans to related parties
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
Interest payable on indebtedness
to related parties
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Rent enhancement receivable from
related parties
|
|
|
13,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in private investment
fund managed by related party
|
|
|
35,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
We and our Manager have entered into
sub-advisory
agreements with other affiliated entities and the fees payable
under such agreements will be paid from any management fees
earned by our Manager. In addition, certain of these affiliated
sub-advisory
entities introduced investments to us for purchase that we
acquired for a total of $262,705 and $2,500 during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006,
respectively. The purchase price was determined at arms
length and the acquisition was approved in advance by the
independent members of our board of directors.
34
Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
The following table sets forth the calculation of Basic and
Diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006 (in thousands, except share and per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Basic EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share of common
stock
|
|
$
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
25,043,565
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
15,444
|
|
|
|
17,495,082
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding for the
purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share of common
stock and assumed conversions
|
|
$
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
25,043,565
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
15,444
|
|
|
|
17,495,082
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
INITIAL PUBLIC
OFFERING
|
In August 2006, we completed the Public Offering, in which we
sold 7,500,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, at an offering price of $23 per share. We received
proceeds from this transaction in the amount of $162,409, net of
underwriting commissions and discounts but before other offering
costs in the amount of $3,810. Each share of common stock
entitles its holder to one vote per share. An affiliate of the
parent of our Manager purchased 1,000,000 shares of our
common stock in the Public Offering. After the transaction, our
outstanding shares totaled 25,019,500.
In April 2007, we issued $115,000 of mortgage-backed notes
through a newly-formed subsidiary, CRZ ABCP Financing LLC. We
retained $9,250 of senior subordinated mortgage-backed notes and
$4,250 of subordinated mortgage-backed notes. CRZ ABCP Financing
LLC holds assets, consisting of commercial whole mortgage loans,
which serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed notes. Senior
mortgage-backed notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$101,500 were issued with floating coupons with an interest rate
of three-month LIBOR plus 0.35%. The senior mortgage-backed
notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non recourse
to us. Proceeds from the sale of the senior mortgage-backed
notes issued were used to repay outstanding debt under our
repurchase agreements.
35
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q.
Historical results set forth are not necessarily indicative of
our future financial position and results of operations.
Overview
We are a specialty finance company formed on January 25,
2005 by Hyperion Brookfield Asset Management, Inc., which we
refer to as Hyperion Brookfield, to invest in real
estate-related securities and various other asset classes. We
commenced operations in March 2005. We have elected and
qualified to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes
commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2005
and expect to qualify as a REIT in subsequent tax years. We
invest in financial assets and intend to construct an investment
portfolio that is leveraged where appropriate to seek to achieve
attractive risk-adjusted returns and that is structured to
comply with the various federal income tax requirements for REIT
status and to qualify for an exclusion from regulation under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, which we refer to as the
Investment Company Act. Our current focus is on the following
asset classes:
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate-related securities, principally RMBS and CMBS;
|
|
|
|
Whole mortgage loans, bridge loans, B Notes and mezzanine loans;
and
|
|
|
|
Other ABS, including CDOs and consumer ABS.
|
We completed a private offering of 17,400,000 shares of our
common stock in March 2005 in which we raised net proceeds of
approximately $405.6 million. We completed our initial
public offering of 7,500,000 shares of our common stock,
which we refer to as our IPO, in August 2006 in which we raised
net proceeds of approximately $158.6 million. We have fully
invested the proceeds from the March 2005 private offering and
our IPO, and, as of March 31, 2007, have a portfolio of MBS
and other investments of approximately $3.6 billion, which
we intend to reallocate from time to time to achieve our optimal
portfolio allocation at such time. We are externally managed by
Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River Capital Advisors, LLC, which
we refer to as Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River or our Manager.
Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River is a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Hyperion Brookfield.
We earn revenues and generate cash through our investments. We
use a substantial amount of leverage to seek to enhance our
returns. We finance each of our investments with different
degrees of leverage. The cost of borrowings to finance our
investments comprises a significant portion of our operating
expenses. Our net income will depend, in large part, on our
ability to control this particular operating expense in relation
to our revenues.
A variety of industry and economic factors may impact our
financial condition and operating performance. These factors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate trends,
|
|
|
|
rates of prepayment on mortgages underlying our MBS,
|
|
|
|
delinquency and loss trends in RMBS and our commercial real
estate investments;
|
|
|
|
valuation of residential and commercial properties;
|
|
|
|
competition, and
|
|
|
|
other market developments.
|
36
In addition, a variety of factors relating to our business may
also impact our financial condition and operating performance.
These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
our leverage,
|
|
|
|
our access to funding and borrowing capacity,
|
|
|
|
our borrowing costs,
|
|
|
|
our hedging activities,
|
|
|
|
the market value of our investments, and
|
|
|
|
REIT requirements and the requirements to qualify for an
exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act.
|
Our Business
Model
Our interest and dividend income net of interest expense, which
we refer to as our net interest and dividend income, is
generated primarily from the net spread, or difference, between
the interest income we earn on our investment portfolio and the
cost of our borrowings and hedging activities. Our net interest
and dividend income will vary based upon, among other things,
the difference between the interest rates earned on our various
interest-earning assets and the borrowing costs of the
liabilities used to finance those investments. Other than our
investments in Agency ARMS, we generally attempt to match fund
our assets in order to match the maturity of the investments
with the maturity of the financing sources used to make such
investments. Although we do not match fund Agency ARMS due
to their average 30 year maturities, we utilize
interest rate swaps to hedge much of our interest rate exposure
of these securities. We also utilize CDO financings, where match
funding occurs as a result of cash flows from the collateral
pool paying the interest on the debt securities issued by the
CDO.
We anticipate that, for any period during which our assets are
not match-funded, such assets could reprice slower or faster
than the corresponding liabilities. Consequently, changes in
interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, may
significantly influence our net income. Increases in these rates
could tend to decrease our net income and the market value of
our assets, and could possibly result in operating losses for us
or limit or eliminate our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
The yield on our assets may be affected by a difference between
the actual prepayment rates and our projections. Prepayments on
loans and securities may be influenced by changes in market
interest rates and a variety of economic, geographic and other
factors beyond our control, and consequently, such prepayment
rates cannot be predicted with certainty. To the extent we have
acquired assets at a premium or discount, a change in prepayment
rates may affect our anticipated yield. Under certain interest
rate and prepayment scenarios we may fail to recoup fully our
cost of acquisition of certain assets.
In periods of declining interest rates, prepayments on our
investments, including our RMBS, likely will increase. If we are
unable to reinvest the proceeds of such prepayments at
comparable yields, our net interest income may suffer. In
periods of rising interest rates, prepayment rates on our
investments, including our RMBS, will likely slow, causing the
expected lives of these investments to increase. This may cause
our net interest income to decrease as our borrowing and hedging
costs rise while our interest income on those assets remains
constant.
Although we use hedging to mitigate some of our interest rate
risk, we do not hedge all of our exposure to changes in interest
rates and prepayment rates, as there are practical limitations
to our ability to insulate the portfolio from all of the
negative consequences
37
associated with changes in short-term interest rates while still
seeking to provide an attractive net spread on our portfolio.
In addition, our returns will be affected by the credit
performance of our non-agency investments. If credit losses on
our investments or the loans underlying our investments
increase, it may have an adverse affect on our performance.
Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River is entitled to receive a base
management fee that is based on the amount of our equity (as
defined in the management agreement), regardless of the
performance of our portfolio. Accordingly, the payment of our
management fee is a fixed cost and will not decline in the event
of a decline in our profitability and may lead us to incur
losses.
Trends
We believe the following trends may also affect our business:
Uncertain interest rate environmentUnited States
interest rates decreased modestly during the first quarter of
2007, as continued weakness in the economy fueled speculation of
that the Federal Reserve will drop the rate on Federal Funds
later in 2007. We believe that interest rates will decline as
weakness in housing will slow the economy sufficiently to cause
an ease in Monetary Policy.
With respect to our existing MBS portfolio, which is heavily
concentrated in 3/1 and 5/1 hybrid adjustable rate RMBS, we have
the risk that, on the one hand, interest rate increases could
result in decreases in our net interest income, as there is a
timing mismatch between the reset dates on our MBS portfolio and
the financing of these investments. On the other hand, a decline
in interest rates, although favorable in reducing our funding
costs, might cause prepayments to rise rapidly, in which case we
then would be in the position of having to reinvest at lower
yields.
We currently have invested and intend to continue to invest in
hybrid adjustable rate RMBS that are based on mortgages with
periodic interest rate caps. The financing of these RMBS is
short term in nature and does not include the benefit of an
interest rate cap. This mismatch could result in a decrease in
our net interest income if rates increase sharply after the
initial fixed rate period and our interest cost increases more
than the interest rate earned on our RMBS due to the related
interest rate caps. With respect to our existing and future
floating rate investments, we believe such interest rate
increases could result in increases in our net interest income
because our floating rate assets are greater in amount than the
related liabilities.
However, we would expect that our fixed rate assets would
decline in value in a rising interest rate environment and our
net interest spreads on fixed rate assets could decline in a
rising interest rate environment to the extent they are financed
with floating rate debt. We have engaged in interest rate swaps
to hedge a material portion of the risk associated with
increases in interest rates. However, because we do not
hedge 100% of the amount of short-term financing
outstanding, increases in interest rates could result in a
decline in the value of our portfolio, net of hedges. Similarly,
decreases in interest rates could result in an increase in the
value of our portfolio.
Weakness of
sub-prime
MBS marketContinued declines in home price
appreciation have weighed heavily on the
sub-prime
MBS market. In addition to rising delinquency across the highly
leveraged loans to weaker borrowers, there has been a rising
trend of first payment defaults on loans, which has created
liabilities for loan originators. As a result, several prominent
sub-prime
lenders have closed down or filed for protection under the
bankruptcy laws in early 2007. The deteriorating situation with
loans and lenders has resulted in a complete dislocation in the
capital markets associated with
sub-prime
MBS and ABS CDOs. In
38
February 2007, the continued pressure on the ABX indices, which
closed the month at all-time lows, filtered into the credit
default swap, or CDS, markets, and finally into the CDO markets.
Delinquency and performance problemsreal fundamental
issueshave finally had an impact on the price of CDO
liabilities, and dramatically dampened the demand for
sub-prime
MBS securities.
Liquidity is the lifeblood of the mortgage business, and the
decline in performance and profitability has not gone unnoticed
by the new-issue securitization market. In March 2007, newly
issued cash bonds had very limited demand, with most underwriter
syndicate groups retaining a significant portion of the capital
structure at pricing, even with yield spreads much wider.
Further, there has been a substantial widening of yield spreads,
including in non-agency prime MBS and CMBS, as buyers demand
more compensation for risk. The increase in risk premium and the
increase in liquidity premium has resulted in a significant
mark-to-market
adjustment for most
sub-prime
floating-rate MBS. As of March 31, 2007, we had
$104.9 million of exposure to the
sub-prime
market that is exposed to the widening yield spreads and
declining prices. As this scenario plays out, we expect
significant opportunity in the
sub-prime
MBS sector on deeply discounted securities.
Flattening/Inverting yield curveRecently, short
term interest rates have been unchanged while longer term
interest rates have fallen. For example, between
December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, the yield on the
three-month U.S. Treasury bill was unchanged, while the
yield on the three-year U.S. Treasury note fell by
approximately 20 basis points. With respect to our MBS
portfolio, we believe that a continued inversion of the yield
curve could result in decreases in our net interest income, as
the financing of our MBS investments is usually shorter in term
than the fixed rate period of our MBS portfolio, which is
heavily weighted toward 3/1 and 5/1 hybrid adjustable rate RMBS.
Similarly, we believe that a steepening of the yield curve could
result in increases in our net interest income. A flattening of
the shape of the yield curve results in a smaller gap between
the rate we pay on the swaps and rate we receive. Furthermore, a
continued flattening of the shape of the yield curve could
result in a decrease in our hedging costs, because we pay a
fixed rate and receive a floating rate under the terms of our
swap agreements. Similarly, a steepening of the shape of the
yield curve could result in an increase in our hedging costs.
Prepayment ratesAs interest rates fall, we believe
that prepayment rates are likely to rise. Prepayment rates on
fixed rate mortgages generally increase when interest rates fall
and decrease when interest rates rise, but changes in prepayment
rates for the hybrid ARMS that constitute the majority of our
MBS investments are more difficult to predict. Prepayment rates
also may be affected by other factors, including, without
limitation, conditions in the housing and financial markets,
general economic conditions and the relative interest rates on
adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage loans. If interest rates
begin to fall, triggering an increase in prepayment rates, our
current portfolio, which is heavily weighted towards hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgages, could cause decreases in our net
interest income relating to our MBS portfolio as we reinvest at
lower yields.
CompetitionWe expect to face increased competition
for our targeted investments. However, we expect that the size
and growth of the market for these investments will continue to
provide us with a variety of investment opportunities. In
addition, we believe that bank lenders will continue their
historical lending practices, requiring low
loan-to-value
ratios and high debt service coverages, which will provide
opportunities to lenders like us to provide corporate mezzanine
financing.
For a discussion of additional risks relating to our business
see the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, a copy of which is
filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
39
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
or U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to
make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments.
These include fair market value of certain assets, amount and
timing of credit losses, prepayment assumptions, and other items
that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and
liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and
expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes
in these estimates (e.g., market values change due to
changes in supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments,
interest rates, or other reasons; yields change due to changes
in credit outlook and loan prepayments) will occur in the near
future. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions
and assessments that could affect our reported assets and
liabilities as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We
believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our
financial statements are based were reasonable at the time made
based upon information available to us at that time. We rely on
the experience of Hyperion Brookfield and Crystal Rivers
management and its analysis of historical and current market
data in order to arrive at what we believe to be reasonable
estimates. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements contained elsewhere herein for a complete discussion
of our accounting policies. Our estimates are inherently
subjective in nature and actual results could differ from our
estimates and differences may be material. We have identified
our most critical accounting policies to be the following:
Investment
Consolidation
For each investment we make, we evaluate the underlying entity
that issued the securities we acquired or to which we made a
loan in order to determine the appropriate accounting. We refer
to guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(SFAS 140), and FASB Interpretation No.
(FIN) 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46R), in performing our analysis.
FIN 46R addresses the application of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to certain entities in which voting rights are
not effective in identifying an investor with a controlling
financial interest. An entity is subject to consolidation under
FIN 46R if the investors either do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated financial support, are unable to direct
the entitys activities, or are not exposed to the
entitys losses or entitled to its residual returns
(variable interest entities or VIEs).
Variable interest entities within the scope of FIN 46R are
required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The
primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to be the party that
absorbs a majority of the VIEs expected losses, receives
the majority of the VIEs expected returns, or both.
Our ownership of the subordinated classes of CMBS and RMBS from
a single issuer may provide us with the right to control the
foreclosure/workout process on the underlying loans, which we
refer to as the Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS. There are
certain exceptions to the scope of FIN 46R, one of which
provides that an investor that holds a variable interest in a
qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) is not
required to consolidate that entity unless the investor has the
unilateral ability to cause the entity to liquidate.
SFAS 140 sets forth the requirements for an entity to
qualify as a QSPE. To maintain the QSPE exception, the
special-purpose entity must initially meet the QSPE criteria and
must continue to satisfy such criteria in subsequent periods. A
special-purpose entitys QSPE status can be impacted in
future periods by activities undertaken by its transferor(s) or
other involved parties, including the manner in which certain
servicing activities are performed. To the extent that our CMBS
or RMBS investments were issued by a special-purpose entity that
meets the QSPE requirements, we record those investments at the
purchase price paid. To the extent the underlying special-
40
purpose entities do not satisfy the QSPE requirements, we follow
the guidance set forth in FIN 46R as the special-purpose
entities would be determined to be VIEs.
We have analyzed the pooling and servicing agreements governing
each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments and
we believe that the terms of those agreements are industry
standard and are consistent with the QSPE criteria. However,
there is uncertainty with respect to QSPE treatment for those
special-purpose entities due to ongoing review by regulators and
accounting standard setters (including the project of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to amend
SFAS 140 and the recently added FASB project on servicer
discretion in a QSPE), potential actions by various parties
involved with the QSPE (discussed in the paragraph above) and
varying and evolving interpretations of the QSPE criteria under
SFAS 140. We also have evaluated each of our Controlling
Class CMBS and RMBS investments for which we own a greater
than 50% interest in the subordinated class as if the
special-purpose entities that issued such securities are not
QSPEs. Using the fair value approach to calculate expected
losses or residual returns, we have concluded that we would not
be the primary beneficiary of any of the underlying
special-purpose entities. Additionally, the standard setters
continue to review the FIN 46R provisions related to the
computations used to determine the primary beneficiary of VIEs.
Future guidance from regulators and standard setters may require
us to consolidate the special-purpose entities that issued the
CMBS and RMBS in which we have invested as described in the
section titled Variable Interest Entities in
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere herein.
Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our investment in
these QSPEs totaled $238.3 million as of March 31,
2007.
Trust Preferred
Securities
Trusts that we form for the sole purpose of issuing trust
preferred securities are not consolidated in our financial
statements in accordance with FIN 46R as we have determined
that we are not the primary beneficiary of such trusts. Our
investment in the common securities of such trusts is included
in other assets in our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
The most significant source of our revenue comes from interest
income on our securities and loan investments. Interest income
on loans and securities investments is recognized over the life
of the investment using the effective interest method. Mortgage
loans will generally be originated or purchased at or near par
value and interest income will be recognized based on the
contractual terms of the debt instrument. Any loan fees or
acquisition costs on originated loans will be deferred and
recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to the
yield. Interest income on MBS is recognized on the effective
interest method as required by Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF)
99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets
(EITF 99-20).
Under
EITF 99-20,
management estimates, at the time of purchase, the future
expected cash flows and determines the effective interest rate
based on these estimated cash flows and our purchase prices.
Subsequent to the purchase and on a quarterly basis, these
estimated cash flows are updated and a revised yield is
calculated based on the current amortized cost of the
investment. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number
of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties and
contingencies. These include the rate and timing of principal
payments (including prepayments, repurchases, defaults and
liquidations), the pass through or coupon rate and interest rate
fluctuations. In addition, interest payment shortfalls have to
be estimated due to delinquencies on the underlying mortgage
loans and the timing and magnitude of credit losses on the
mortgage loans underlying the securities. These uncertainties
and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to
future events that may affect managements estimates and
our interest income. When current period cash flow estimates are
lower than the
41
previous period and fair value is less than an assets
carrying value, we will write down the asset to fair market
value and record an impairment charge in current period earnings.
Through its extensive experience in investing in MBS, Hyperion
Brookfield has developed models based on historical data in
order to estimate the lifetime prepayment speeds and lifetime
credit losses for pools of mortgage loans. The models are based
primarily on loan characteristics, such as
loan-to-value
ratios (LTV), borrower credit scores, loan type,
loan rate, property type, etc., and also include other
qualitative factors such as the loan originator and servicer.
Once the models have been used to project the base case
prepayment speeds and to project the base case cumulative loss,
those outputs are used to create yield estimates and to project
cash flows.
Because mortgage assets amortize over long periods of time
(i.e., 25 to 30 years in the case of RMBS assets or
10 years in the case of CMBS assets), the expected lifetime
prepayment experience and the expected lifetime credit losses
projected by the models are subject to modification in light of
actual experience assessed from time to time. For each of the
purchased mortgage pools, our Manager tracks the actual monthly
prepayment experience and the monthly loss experience, if any.
To the extent that the actual performance trend over a
6-12 month
period of time does not reasonably approximate the expected
lifetime trend, in consideration of the seasoning of the asset,
our Manager may make adjustments to the assumptions and revise
yield estimates and projected cash flows.
We have retained substantially all of the risks and benefits of
ownership of our rental properties and therefore we account for
leases with our tenants as operating leases. The total amount of
contractual rent that we receive from operating leases is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease;
and a straight-line or free rent receivable, as applicable, is
recorded for the difference between the rental revenue recorded
and the contractual amount received. In addition to base rent,
the tenants in our commercial real estate properties also pay
substantially all operating costs.
Loan Loss
Provisions
We purchase and originate mezzanine loans and commercial
mortgage loans to be held as long-term investments. We evaluate
each of these loans for possible impairment on a quarterly
basis. Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that we will
not be able to collect all amounts due according to the
contractual terms of the loan. Upon determination of impairment,
we will establish a reserve for loan losses and a corresponding
charge to earnings through the provision for loan losses.
Significant judgments are required in determining impairment,
which include assumptions regarding the value of the real estate
or partnership interests that secure the mortgage loans.
Valuations of MBS
and ABS
Our MBS and ABS have fair values as determined with reference to
price estimates provided by independent pricing services and
dealers in the securities. Different judgments and assumptions
used in pricing could result in different estimates of value.
When the fair value of an
available-for-sale
security is less than its amortized cost for an extended period,
we consider whether there is an
other-than-temporary
impairment in the value of the security. If, in our judgment, an
other-than-temporary
impairment exists, the cost basis of the security is written
down to the then-current fair value, and the unrealized loss is
transferred from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an
immediate reduction of current earnings (as if the loss had been
realized in the period of
other-than-temporary
impairment). The determination of
other-than-temporary
impairment is a subjective process, and different judgments and
assumptions could affect the timing of loss realization.
42
We consider the following factors when determining an
other-than-temporary
impairment for a security or investment:
|
|
|
|
|
The length of time and the extent to which the market value has
been less than the amortized cost;
|
|
|
|
Whether the security has been downgraded by a rating
agency; and
|
|
|
|
Our intent to hold the security for a period of time sufficient
to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
|
Periodically, all available for sale securities are evaluated
for other than temporary impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115), and
Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
and Retained Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial
Assets
(EITF 99-20).
An impairment that is an other than temporary
impairment is a decline in the fair value of an investment
below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate
the decline will not be recovered over the investments
remaining life. Other than temporary impairments result in
reducing the securitys carrying value to its fair value
through the statement of income, which also creates a new
carrying value for the investment. We compute a revised yield
based on the future estimated cash flows as described in
Revenue Recognition above. Significant
judgments are required in determining impairment, which include
making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss
assumptions and the changes in interest rates.
The determination of
other-than-temporary
impairment is made at least quarterly. If we determine an
impairment to be other than temporary we will need to realize a
loss that would have an impact on future income. Under the
guidance provided by SFAS 115, a security is impaired when
its fair value is less than its amortized cost and we do not
intend to hold that security until we recover its amortized cost
or until its maturity. At March 31, 2007, we had the
positive intent and ability to hold our available for sale
securities. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we
did not identify any securities that were determined to be
impaired under the guidance provided by SFAS 115. In
addition, we recorded an impairment charge on four RMBS
securities under
EITF 99-20
in the amount of $0.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, we still owned
all four of those securities.
Commercial Real
Estate
Commercial properties held for investment are carried at cost
less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, upon
acquisition, we allocate the purchase price to the components of
the commercial properties acquired: the amount allocated to land
is based on its estimated fair value; buildings and existing
tenant improvements are recorded at depreciated replacement
cost; above- and below-market in-place operating leases are
determined based on the present value of the difference between
the rents payable under the contractual terms of the leases and
estimated market rents; lease origination costs for in-place
operating leases are determined based on the estimated costs
that would be incurred to put the existing leases in place under
the same terms and conditions; and tenant relationships are
measured based on the present value of the estimated avoided net
costs if a tenant were to renew its lease at expiry, discounted
by the probability of such renewal.
We have retained substantially all of the risks and benefits of
ownership of our rental properties and therefore we account for
leases with our tenants as operating leases. The total amount of
contractual rent that we receive from operating leases is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease;
and a straight-line or free rent receivable, as applicable, is
43
recorded for the difference between the rental revenue recorded
and the contractual amount received.
Depreciation on buildings is provided on a straight-line basis
over the useful lives of the properties to a maximum of
40 years. Depreciation is determined with reference to each
rental propertys carried value, remaining estimated useful
life and residual value. Acquired tenant improvements, above-
and below-market in-place operating leases and lease origination
costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
terms of the leases. The value associated with acquired tenant
relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
expected term of the relationships. All other tenant
improvements and re-leasing costs are deferred and amortized on
a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases to which they
relate. Depreciation on buildings and amortization of deferred
leasing costs and tenant improvements that are determined to be
assets of the company are recorded in depreciation and
amortization expense. All above- and below-market tenant leases
and tenant relationships are amortized to revenue. Above- and
below-market ground leases are amortized to operating expenses.
Properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. For commercial properties, an impairment loss is
recognized when a propertys carrying value exceeds its
undiscounted future net cash flow. The impairment is measured as
the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated
fair value. Projections of future cash flow take into account
the specific business plan for each property and
managements best estimate of the most probable set of
economic conditions anticipated to prevail in the market.
Accounting For
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
Activities
Our policies permit us to enter into derivative contracts,
including interest rate swaps, currency swaps, interest rate
caps and interest rate swap forwards, as a means of mitigating
our interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated
with the benchmark rate on forecasted rollover/reissuance of
repurchase agreements, or hedged items, for a specified future
time period. We currently intend to use interest rate derivative
instruments to mitigate interest rate risk rather than to
enhance returns.
At March 31, 2007, we were a party to 36 interest rate
swaps and caps with a notional par value of approximately
$1,707.4 million that had a net fair value of approximately
$7.7 million, which is included in our derivative assets.
We entered into these interest rate swaps and caps to seek to
mitigate our interest rate risk for the specified future time
period, which is defined as the term of the swap and cap
contracts. Based upon the market value of these interest rate
swap and cap contracts, our counterparties may request
additional margin collateral or we may request additional
collateral from our counterparties to ensure that an appropriate
margin account balance is maintained at all times through the
expiration of the contracts.
At March 31, 2007, we were a party to two currency swaps
with a notional par value of approximately Can$50.0 million
and £10.0 million that had a net fair value of
approximately $0.3 million, which is included in our
derivative assets. We entered into these currency swaps to seek
to mitigate our currency risk for the specified future time
period, which is defined as the term of the swap contracts.
Based upon the market value of these currency swap contracts,
our counterparties may request additional margin collateral or
we may request additional collateral from our counterparties to
ensure that an appropriate margin account balance is maintained
at all times through the expiration of the contracts.
As of March 31, 2007, we had six CDS with a notional
par value of $55.0 million that are reflected on our
balance sheet as a derivative asset at their fair value of
approximately $1.6 million and eight CDS with a
notional par value of $105.0 million that are reflected on
our balance sheet as a derivative liability at their fair value
of approximately $7.3 million. The fair
44
value of the CDS depends on a number of factors, primarily
premium levels, which are dependent on interest rate spreads.
The CDS contracts are valued using internally developed and
tested market-standard pricing models that calculate the net
present value of differences between future premiums on
currently quoted market CDS and the contractual future premiums
on our CDS contracts.
We account for derivative and hedging activities in accordance
with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended
(SFAS 133). SFAS 133 requires recognizing
all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in
the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in
fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative
instrument depends on whether it has been designated and
qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the
type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments
that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we must
designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being
hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a
net investment in a foreign operation. We have no fair value
hedges or hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to
variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable
to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss
on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings (for example, in interest expense when the
hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with
floating-rate debt). The remaining gain (loss) on the derivative
instrument in excess of the cumulative changes in the present
value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is
recognized in the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
derivatives in current earnings during the period of change. For
derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments,
the gain or loss is recognized in realized and unrealized gain
(loss) on derivatives in the current earnings during the period
of change. Income
and/or
expense from interest rate swaps are recognized as a net
adjustment to interest expense. We account for income and
expense from interest rate swaps on an accrual basis over the
period to which the payment
and/or
receipt relates.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make a significant number of estimates in the
preparation of the financial statements. These estimates include
determining the fair market value of certain investments and
derivative liabilities, amount and timing of credit losses,
prepayment assumptions, allocation of purchase price to tangible
and intangible assets on property acquisitions, and other items
that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and
liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and
expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes
in these estimates (e.g., market values change due to
changes in supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments,
interest rates, or other reasons; yields change due to changes
in credit outlook and loan prepayments) will occur in the near
future. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and
actual results could differ from our estimates and differences
may be material.
Share-Based
Payment
We account for share-based compensation issued to members of our
board of directors, our Manager and certain of our senior
executives using the fair value based methodology in accordance
with SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation (SFAS 123R). We do not have
any employees, although we believe that members of our board of
directors are deemed to be employees for purposes of
interpreting and applying accounting principles
45
relating to share-based compensation. We record as compensation
costs the restricted common stock that we issued to members of
our board of directors at fair value as of the grant date and we
amortize the cost into expense over the applicable vesting
period using the straight-line method. We recorded compensation
costs for restricted common stock and common stock options that
we issued to our Manager and that were reallocated to employees
of our Manager and its affiliates that provide services to us at
fair value as of the grant date and we remeasure the amount on
subsequent reporting dates to the extent that the restricted
common stock
and/or
common stock options are unvested. Prior to our initial public
offering and listing on the New York Stock Exchange, unvested
restricted stock was valued using appraised value, and
subsequent to our initial public offering and listing, we used
the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Unvested common stock options are valued using a Binomial
pricing model and assumptions based on observable market data
for comparable companies. The assumptions we use in determining
share based compensation, including expected stock price
volatility, dividend yield, risk free interest rate and the
expected life of the options, are subject to judgments and the
results of our operations would change if different assumptions
were utilized. We amortize compensation expense related to the
restricted common stock and common stock options that we granted
to our Manager using the graded vesting attribution method in
accordance with SFAS 123R.
Because we remeasure the amount of compensation costs associated
with the unvested restricted common stock and unvested common
stock options that we issued to our Manager and certain of our
senior executives as of each reporting period, our share-based
compensation expense reported in our statements of operations
will change based on the fair value of our common stock and this
may result in earnings volatility.
Interest
in Equity Investment
We account for our investment in BREF One, LLC, a real estate
finance fund, under the equity method of accounting since we own
more than a minor interest in the fund, but do not unilaterally
control the fund and are not considered to be the primary
beneficiary under FIN 46R. The investment was recorded
initially at cost, and subsequently adjusted for equity in net
income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions.
Income
Taxes
We operate in a manner that we believe will allow us to be taxed
as a REIT and, as a result, we do not expect to pay substantial
corporate-level income taxes. Many of the requirements for REIT
qualification, however, are highly technical and complex. If we
were to fail to meet these requirements and do not qualify for
certain statutory relief provisions, we would be subject to
federal income tax, which could have a material adverse impact
on our results of operations and amounts available for
distributions to our stockholders. In addition, Crystal River
TRS Holdings, Inc., our TRS, is subject to corporate-level
income taxes.
Our policy for interest and penalties on material uncertain tax
positions recognized in our consolidated financial statements is
to classify these as interest expense and operating expense,
respectively. However, in accordance with Financial
Interpretation Number 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, (FIN 48) we assessed our tax positions
for all open tax years (Federal, years 2005 to 2006 and State,
years 2005 to 2006) as of March 31, 2007 and concluded that
we have no material FIN 48 liabilities to be recognized at
this time.
Financial
Condition
All of our assets at March 31, 2007 were acquired with the
net proceeds of approximately $405.6 million from our March
2005 private offering of 17,400,000 shares of our common
stock, the net proceeds of approximately $158.6 million
from our August 2006 initial public offering of
7,500,000 shares of our common stock, the net proceeds of
approximately $48.6 million from our March 2007 issuance of
trust preferred securities and our use of leverage.
46
Mortgage-Backed
Securities
Some of our mortgage investment strategy involves buying higher
coupon, higher premium dollar priced bonds, which takes on more
prepayment risk (particularly call or prepayment risk) than
lower dollar-priced strategies. However, we believe that the
potential benefits of this strategy include higher income, wider
spreads, and lower hedging costs due to the shorter
option-adjusted duration of the higher coupon security.
The table below summarizes our MBS investments at March 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
2,295,758
|
|
|
$
|
497,819
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
|
9,658
|
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(23,875
|
)
|
|
|
(10,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
2,281,541
|
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, the RMBS and CMBS in our portfolio
were purchased at a net discount to their par value and our
portfolio had a weighted average amortized cost of 97.4% and
71.2% of face amount, respectively. The RMBS and CMBS were
valued below par at March 31, 2007 because we are investing
in lower-rated bonds in the credit structure. Certain of the
securities held at March 31, 2007 are valued below cost.
Other than securities with respect to which impairments have
been recorded, we do not believe any such securities are other
than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2007.
Our MBS holdings were as follows at March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months to
|
|
|
Yield to
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Reset(2)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Rate(3)
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Agency Prime MBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/1 adjustable rate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Investment grade
|
|
|
15,521
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
49.74
|
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
36.91
|
|
Below investment grade
|
|
|
150,288
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
13.37
|
|
|
|
27.51
|
|
|
|
42.34
|
|
Non-Agency
Sub-prime
MBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade
|
|
|
65,438
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
7.17
|
|
|
|
7.53
|
|
|
|
13.37
|
|
|
|
29.26
|
|
Below investment grade
|
|
|
39,458
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
7.99
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
29.68
|
|
|
|
31.67
|
|
Agency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 hybrid adjustable rate
|
|
|
579,048
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
20.63
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
43.61
|
|
5/1 hybrid adjustable rate
|
|
|
1,431,788
|
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
|
|
|
40.14
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
40.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total RMBS
|
|
$
|
2,281,541
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
31.62
|
|
|
|
7.34
|
|
|
|
41.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade CMBS
|
|
$
|
250,766
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below investment grade CMBS
|
|
|
242,540
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CMBS
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All securities listed in this chart are carried at their
estimated fair value. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents number of months before conversion to floating rate. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the estimated percentage of principal that will be
prepaid over the next 12 months based on historical
principal paydowns. |
47
The estimated weighted average lives of the MBS in the tables
above are based upon our prepayment expectations, which are
based on both proprietary and subscription-based financial
models.
Our prepayment projections consider current and expected trends
in interest rates, interest rate volatility, steepness of the
yield curve, the mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, time to
reset and the spread margin of the reset.
The table below summarizes the credit ratings of our MBS
investments at March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
2,010,836
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
27,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
52,115
|
|
|
|
250,766
|
|
BB
|
|
|
96,701
|
|
|
|
121,809
|
|
B
|
|
|
64,739
|
|
|
|
65,609
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
29,862
|
|
|
|
55,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,281,541
|
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities of RMBS are generally shorter than stated
contractual maturities, as they are affected by the contractual
lives of the underlying mortgages, periodic payments of
principal, and prepayments of principal. The stated contractual
final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying our portfolio of
RMBS ranges up to 30 years, but the expected maturity is
subject to change based on the prepayments of the underlying
loans. As of March 3, 2007, the average final contractual
maturity of the mortgage portfolio is 2036.
The constant prepayment rate, or CPR, attempts to predict the
percentage of principal that will be prepaid over the next
12 months based on historical principal paydowns. As
interest rates rise, the rate of refinancings typically
declines, which we believe may result in lower rates of
prepayment and, as a result, a lower portfolio CPR.
As of March 31, 2007, some of the mortgages underlying our
RMBS had fixed interest rates for the weighted average lives of
approximately 32 months, after which time the interest
rates reset and become adjustable. The average length of time
until contractual maturity of those mortgages as of
March 31, 2007 was 30 years.
After the reset date, interest rates on our hybrid adjustable
rate RMBS securities float based on spreads over various LIBOR
and Treasury indices. These interest rates are subject to caps
that limit the amount the applicable interest rate can increase
during any year, known as an annual cap, and through the
maturity of the applicable security, known as a lifetime cap.
The weighted average annual cap for the portfolio is an increase
of 1.97%; the weighted average maximum increases and decreases
for the portfolio are 5.02%. Additionally, the weighted average
maximum increases and decreases for agency hybrid RMBS in the
first year that the rates are adjustable are 3.05%.
48
The following table summarizes our RMBS and our CMBS according
to their estimated weighted average life classifications as of
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Weighted Average
Life
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
$
|
7,824
|
|
|
$
|
9,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Greater than one year and less
than five years
|
|
|
2,231,808
|
|
|
|
2,244,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than five years
|
|
|
41,909
|
|
|
|
42,361
|
|
|
|
493,306
|
|
|
|
497,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,281,541
|
|
|
$
|
2,295,758
|
|
|
$
|
493,306
|
|
|
$
|
497,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated weighted-average lives of the MBS in the tables
above are based upon prepayment models obtained through
subscription-based financial information service providers.
The prepayment model considers current yield, forward yield,
steepness of the yield curve, current mortgage rates, the
mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, loan age, margin and
volatility.
The actual weighted average lives of the MBS in our investment
portfolio could be longer or shorter than the estimates in the
table above depending on the actual prepayment rates experienced
over the lives of the applicable securities and are sensitive to
changes in both prepayment rates and interest rates.
Equity
Securities
Our investment policies allow us to acquire equity securities,
including common and preferred shares issued by other real
estate investment trusts. At March 31, 2007, we held two
investments in equity securities. These investments are
classified as available for sale and thus carried at fair value
on our balance sheet with changes in fair value recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income until realized.
Real Estate
Loans
At March 31, 2007, our real estate loans are reported at
cost. These investments are periodically reviewed for
impairment. As of March 31, 2007, there was no impairment
in our real estate loans.
In 2005, we originated a $9.5 million mezzanine
construction loan to develop luxury residential condominiums in
Portland, Oregon. The loan provides for an aggregate of
$6.7 million of advances for construction costs and
$2.8 million for capitalized interest on the outstanding
loan balance. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of 16%
and has a maturity date of November 2007, which can be extended
at the borrowers option, subject to satisfying certain
conditions, until May 2008. In accordance with the terms of the
loan agreement, interest on the loan was paid in cash through
March 2006 and was capitalized thereafter. As of March 31,
2007, we have made advances of $8.4 million, including
capitalized interest of $1.5 million.
Currently, the projected total costs to complete the project
have increased from $41.4 million to $58.6 million,
including capitalized interest. Of the 70 units available,
50 units have been sold subject to scheduled completion
dates, which are not expected to be met. We have commenced
negotiations with the senior lender and the developer regarding
the developers need to obtain additional financing to
cover these additional construction costs.
We have evaluated the financial merits of the project by
reviewing the projected unit sales, estimating construction
costs and evaluating other collateral available to us under the
terms of
49
the loan. Our management believes that it is probable that the
entire loan balance, including the capitalized interest, will be
recovered through the satisfaction of future cash flows from
sales and other available collateral. Accordingly, we have not
recorded any impairment related to this loan. We will continue
to monitor the status of this loan and we intend to work with
the borrower and the senior lender to recover the outstanding
loan balance. However, housing prices, in particular condominium
prices, may fall, unit sales may lag projections and
construction costs may increase, all of which may increase the
risk of impairment to our loan. No assurance can be given that
this loan will not be impaired in the future depending on the
outcome of future events, including the outcome of negotiations
with the senior lender and the borrower. In the event that we
determine that it is probable that we will not be able to
recover the total outstanding principal and interest due on this
loan, we will reevaluate whether the loan is impaired.
Commercial Real
Estate
At March 31, 2007, our commercial real estate is reported
at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. In accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, upon
acquisition, we allocate the purchase price to the components of
the commercial properties acquired: the amount allocated to land
is based on its estimated fair value; buildings and existing
tenant improvements are recorded at depreciated replacement
cost; above- and below-market in-place operating leases are
determined based on the present value of the difference between
the rents payable under the contractual terms of the leases and
estimated market rents; lease origination costs for in-place
operating leases are determined based on the estimated costs
that would be incurred to put the existing leases in place under
the same terms and conditions; and tenant relationships are
measured based on the present value of the estimated avoided net
costs if a tenant were to renew its lease at expiry, discounted
by the probability of such renewal.
Depreciation on buildings is provided on a straight-line basis
over the useful lives of the properties to a maximum of
40 years. Depreciation is determined with reference to each
rental propertys carried value, remaining estimated useful
life and residual value. Acquired tenant improvements, above-
and below-market in-place operating leases and lease origination
costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
terms of the leases. The value associated with acquired tenant
relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
expected term of the relationships. All other tenant
improvements and re-leasing costs are deferred and amortized on
a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases to which they
relate. Depreciation on buildings and amortization of deferred
leasing costs and tenant improvements that are determined to be
assets of the company are recorded in depreciation and
amortization expense. All above- and below-market tenant leases
and tenant relationships are amortized to revenue. Above- and
below-market ground leases are amortized to operating expenses.
Properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. For commercial properties, an impairment loss is
recognized when a propertys carrying value exceeds its
undiscounted future net cash flow. The impairment is measured as
the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated
fair value. Projections of future cash flow take into account
the specific business plan for each property and
managements best estimate of the most probable set of
economic conditions anticipated to prevail in the market.
Interest and
Principal Paydown Receivable
At March 31, 2007, we had interest and principal paydown
receivables of approximately $22.9 million,
$0.4 million of which related to interest that had accrued
on securities prior to our purchase of such securities. The
total interest and principal paydown receivable amount
50
consisted of approximately $16.5 million relating to our
MBS and approximately $6.4 million relating to other
investments.
Hedging
Instruments and Derivative Activities
There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have
the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or
financial condition. Moreover, no hedging activity can
completely insulate us from the risks associated with changes in
interest rates and prepayment rates. We generally intend to
hedge as much of the interest rate risk as Hyperion Brookfield
Crystal River determines is in the best interests of our
stockholders, after considering the cost of such hedging
transactions and our desire to maintain our status as a REIT.
Our policies do not contain specific requirements as to the
percentages or amount of interest rate risk that our manager is
required to hedge.
As of March 31, 2007, we had engaged in interest rate swaps
and interest rate swap forwards as a means of mitigating our
interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated
with repurchase agreements for a specified future time period,
which is the term of the swap contract. An interest rate swap is
a contractual agreement entered into by two counterparties under
which each agrees to make periodic payments to the other for an
agreed period of time based upon a notional amount of principal.
Under the most common form of interest rate swap, a series of
payments calculated by applying a fixed rate of interest to a
notional amount of principal is exchanged for a stream of
payments similarly calculated but using a floating rate of
interest. This is a fixed-floating interest rate swap. We hedge
our floating rate debt by entering into fixed-floating interest
rate swap agreements whereby we swap the floating rate of
interest on the liability we are hedging for a fixed rate of
interest. An interest rate swap forward is an interest rate swap
based on an interest rate to be set at an agreed future date. As
of March 31, 2007, we were a party to interest rate swaps
and caps with maturities ranging from November 2007 to July 2021
with a notional par amount of approximately
$1,707.4 million. Under the swap agreements in place at
March 31, 2007, we receive interest at rates that reset
periodically, generally every three months, and pay a rate fixed
at the initiation of and for the life of the swap agreements.
The current market value of interest rate swaps is heavily
dependent on the current market fixed rate, the corresponding
term structure of floating rates (known as the yield curve) as
well as the expectation of changes in future floating rates. As
expectations of future floating rates change, the market value
of interest rate swaps changes. Based on the daily market value
of those interest rate swaps and interest rate swap forward
contracts, our counterparties may request additional margin
collateral or we may request additional collateral from our
counterparties to ensure that an appropriate margin account
balance is maintained at all times through the maturity of the
contracts. At March 31, 2007, the unrealized gain on
interest rate swap and cap contracts was $7.7 million due
to an increase in prevailing market interest rates.
As of March 31, 2007, we had engaged in credit default
swaps, or CDS, which are accounted for as derivatives. CDS are
derivative securities that attempt to replicate the credit risk
involved with owning a particular unrelated third party
security, which we refer to as a reference obligation. We enter
into CDS on two types of securities: RMBS and CMBS. Investing in
assets through CDS subjects us to additional risks. When we
enter into a CDS with respect to an asset, we do not have any
legal or beneficial interest in the reference obligation but
have only a contractual relationship with the counterparty,
typically a broker-dealer or other financial institution, and do
not have the benefit of any collateral or other security or
remedies that would be available to holders of the reference
obligation or the right to receive information regarding the
underlying obligors or issuers of the reference obligation. In
addition, in the event of insolvency of a CDS counterparty, we
would be treated as a general creditor of the counterparty to
the extent the counterparty does not post collateral and,
therefore, we may be subject to significant counterparty credit
risk. As of March 31, 2007, we were party to CDS with
51
four counterparties. CDS are relatively new instruments, the
terms of which may contain ambiguous provisions that are subject
to interpretation, with consequences that could be adverse to us.
We can be the seller or the buyer of protection, currently,
across all our exposures we are the seller of the protection.
The seller of protection through CDS is exposed to those risks
associated with owning the underlying reference obligation. The
seller, however, does not receive periodic interest payments,
but instead it receives periodic premium payments for assuming
the credit risk of the reference obligation. These risks are
called credit events and generally consist of
failure to pay principal, failure to pay interest, write-downs,
implied write-downs and distressed ratings downgrades of the
reference obligation.
For some CDS, upon the occurrence of a credit event with respect
to a reference obligation, the buyer of protection may have the
option to deliver the reference obligation to the seller of
protection in part or in whole at par or to elect cash
settlement. In this event, should the buyer of protection elect
cash settlement for a credit event that has occurred, it will
trigger a payment, the amount of which is based on the
proportional amount of failure or write-down. In the case of a
distressed ratings downgrade, the buyer of protection must
deliver the reference obligation to the seller of protection,
and there is no cash settlement option. In most cases, however,
the CDS is a PAUG (pay as you go) CDS, in which case, at the
point a write-down or an interest shortfall occurs, the
protection seller pays the protection buyer a cash amount, and
the contract remains outstanding until such time as the
reference obligation has a factor of zero. In most of these
instances, it will create a loss for the protection seller,
which is generally us.
As of March 31, 2007, we were a party to 14 credit default
swaps with maturities ranging from June 2035 to March 2049 with
a notional par amount of $160.0 million. At March 31,
2007, the fair value of our net liability relating to credit
default swap contracts was $5.7 million, which represented
a decrease of $9.0 million in fair value from
December 31, 2006 primarily as a result of an increase in
the credit spreads of the CDS.
As of March 31, 2007, we had engaged in currency swaps as a
means of mitigating our currency risk under one of our real
estate loans that was denominated in Canadian dollars and one of
our other investments that was denominated in British Pounds. As
of March 31, 2007, we were a party to one currency swap
with a maturity of July 2021 with a notional par amount of
Can$50.0 million and one other currency swap with a
maturity of January 2014 with a notional par amount of
£10.0 million. The current market value of currency
swaps is heavily dependent on the current currency exchange rate
and the expectation of changes in future currency exchange
rates. As expectations of future currency exchange rates change,
the market value of currency swaps changes. Based on the daily
market value of those currency swaps, our counterparties may
request additional margin collateral or we may request
additional collateral from our counterparties to ensure that an
appropriate margin account balance is maintained at all times
through the maturity of the contracts. At March 31, 2007,
the net fair value of our derivative asset relating to currency
swap contracts was $0.3 million as a result of a marginal
weakening of the United States dollar versus the Canadian dollar
and the British pound.
Liabilities
We have entered into repurchase agreements to finance some of
our purchases of available for sale securities and real estate
loans. These agreements are secured by our available for sale
securities and real estate loans and bear interest rates that
have historically moved in close relationship to LIBOR. As of
March 31, 2007, we had established numerous borrowing
arrangements with various investment banking firms and other
lenders. As of March 31, 2007, we were utilizing 12 of
those arrangements.
52
At March 31, 2007, we had outstanding obligations under
repurchase agreements with twelve counterparties totaling
approximately $2,114.7 million with weighted average
current borrowing rates of 5.50%, all of which have maturities
of between five and 75 days. We intend to seek to renew
these repurchase agreements as they mature under the
then-applicable borrowing terms of the counterparties to the
repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2007, the repurchase
agreements were secured by available for sale securities and
real estate loans and cash with an estimated fair value of
approximately $2,193.3 million and had weighted average
maturities of 37 days. The net amount at risk, defined as
fair value of the collateral, including restricted cash, minus
repurchase agreement liabilities and accrued interest expense,
with all counterparties was approximately $103.3 million at
March 31, 2007. One of the repurchase agreements is a
$275.0 million master repurchase agreement with Wachovia
Bank that has a two year term, expiring in August 2007, with a
one year renewal option. The Wachovia Bank master repurchase
agreement provides for the purchase, sale and repurchase of
commercial and residential mortgage loans, commercial mezzanine
loans, B Notes, participation interests in the foregoing,
commercial mortgage-backed securities and other mutually agreed
upon collateral and bears interest at varying rates over LIBOR
based upon the type of asset included in the repurchase
obligation.
Stockholders
Equity
Stockholders equity at March 31, 2007 was
approximately $520.9 million and included
$17.5 million of net unrealized holdings losses on
securities available for sale and $4.4 million of net
unrealized and realized gains on interest rate agreements
accounted for as cash flow hedges presented as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Results of
Operations For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Summary
Our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007
was $7.5 million or $0.30 per weighted average basic
and diluted share outstanding, compared with $15.4 million
or $0.88 per weighted average basic and diluted share
outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Net
income decreased by $7.9 million, or 51.3%, from the first
quarter 2006 to the first quarter 2007, while net income per
weighted average basic and diluted share outstanding decreased
by $0.58 or 65.9%, from the first quarter 2006 to the first
quarter 2007 as the weighted average number of shares of our
common stock outstanding increased from 17,495,082 for the first
quarter 2006 to 25,043,565 for the first quarter 2007.
53
Revenues
The following table sets forth information regarding our
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial MBS
|
|
$
|
9,789
|
|
|
$
|
4,460
|
|
|
$
|
5,329
|
|
|
|
119.5
|
%
|
Residential MBSNon Agency MBS
|
|
|
9,450
|
|
|
|
10,827
|
|
|
|
(1,377
|
)
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
Agency ARMS
|
|
|
30,003
|
|
|
|
21,456
|
|
|
|
8,547
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
ABS
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Underwriting costs
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
Other interest and dividend income
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
271.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
57,229
|
|
|
|
41,078
|
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
Rental income, net
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
57,767
|
|
|
$
|
41,078
|
|
|
$
|
16,689
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007
with respect to CMBS, Agency ARMS and real estate loans
increased $5.3 million, or 119.5%, $8.6 million, or
39.8%, and $1.7 million, or 65.6%, respectively, over
interest income for the same period in 2006 because we had more
investments in those asset classes during the first quarter of
2007. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we also
had income of $0.5 million relating to income from our
commercial property investments, which were made in 2007.
54
Expenses
The following table sets forth information regarding our total
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
32,778
|
|
|
$
|
25,355
|
|
|
$
|
7,423
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements and notes,
related party
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
253.5
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(2,866
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(393.3
|
)
|
CDO notes
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
135.4
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
607.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
40,135
|
|
|
|
28,851
|
|
|
|
11,284
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
Management fees, related party
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Incentive fees
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Public company expense
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
151.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
44,251
|
|
|
$
|
31,616
|
|
|
$
|
12,635
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense relating to repurchase agreements and notes,
including with related parties, for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 increased $8.9 million, or 34.5%, over
the same period in 2006 because we financed a larger investment
portfolio in the first quarter of 2007 and interest rates in the
first quarter of 2007 were higher than in the first quarter of
2006. Interest expense relating to CDO Notes for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 increased $3.9 million, or
135.4%, over the same period in 2006 as a result of added
interest expense from our second CDO financing, which closed in
January 2007, and because interest rates were higher in the
first quarter of 2007 than in the first quarter of 2006.
Interest income from interest rate swaps for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 increased $2.3 million, or
393.3%, over the same period in 2006 because interest rates in
the 2007 quarter were higher than in the 2006 quarter and
because we had a higher notional amount of interest rate swaps
in place in the 2007 quarter.
Expenses for the first quarter of 2007 also included base
management fees of approximately $2.1 million and
amortization of approximately $0.3 million related to
restricted stock and options granted to our Manager. Expenses
for the first quarter of 2006 also included base management fees
of approximately $1.5 million and amortization of
approximately $0.2 million related to restricted stock and
options granted to our manager. Management fee expenses
increased primarily due to the increase in stockholders
equity in late 2006 as a result of our initial public offering.
Our Manager has waived its right to request reimbursement from
us of third-party expenses that it incurs through June 30,
2007, which amount otherwise would have been required to be
reimbursed. The management agreement with Hyperion Brookfield
Crystal River, which was negotiated before our business model
was implemented, provides that we will
55
reimburse our Manager for certain third party expenses that it
incurs on our behalf, including rent and utilities. Hyperion
Brookfield incurs such costs and did not allocate any such
expenses to our Manager in 2005 or 2006 as our Managers
use of such services was deemed to be immaterial. Hyperion
Brookfield currently is determining the amount of such rent and
utility costs that will be allocated to our Manager commencing
July 1, 2007 and we will be responsible for reimbursing
such costs allocable to our operations absent any further waiver
of reimbursement by our Manager. There are no contractual
limitations on our obligation to reimburse our Manager for third
party expenses and our Manager may incur such expenses
consistent with the grant of authority provided to it pursuant
to the management agreement without any additional approval of
our board of directors being required. In addition, our Manager
may defer our reimbursement obligation from any quarter to a
future period; provided, however, that we will record any
necessary accrual for any such reimbursement obligations when
required by GAAP and our Manager has advised us that it will
promptly invoice us for such reimbursements consistent with
sound financial accounting policies.
Other Revenues
(Expenses)
Other expenses for 2007 totaled approximately $6.0 million,
compared with other revenues of $6.0 million for 2006, a
decrease of $12.0 million or 200.0%. Other expenses for
2007 consisted primarily of $8.5 million of realized and
unrealized loss on derivatives and a $0.6 million loss on
impairment of securities available for sale, which was offset in
part by $1.6 million of realized net gain on the sale of
securities available for sale and real estate loans,
$0.8 million of income from equity investments and
$0.5 million of foreign currency exchange gain. Other
revenues for 2006 totaled approximately $6.0 million, which
consisted primarily of $7.9 million of realized and
unrealized gains on derivatives, which was offset in part by
$0.6 million of realized net losses on the sale of
securities available for sale and $1.3 million of losses on
impairment of securities available for sale.
Income Tax
Expense
We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under
Section 856(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, commencing with the tax year ended December 31,
2005. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income
tax. To maintain qualification as a REIT, we must distribute at
least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders and
meet certain other requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT
in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on
our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We may also be
subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and
property. Under certain circumstances, federal income and excise
taxes may be due on our undistributed taxable income.
At March 31, 2007 and 2006, we were in compliance with all
REIT requirements and, accordingly, have not provided for income
tax expense on our REIT taxable income for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 or for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. We also have a taxable REIT subsidiary that
is subject to tax at regular corporate rates. During the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the three months ended
March 31, 2006, we recorded $0.3 million and $0,
respectively, of current income tax expense and
$0.8 million and $0, respectively, of deferred tax benefit,
in each case, that was attributable to our taxable REIT
subsidiary. The deferred tax benefit is attributable to the mark
to market adjustments for foreign currency swaps held in the
TRS. Our total income tax benefit for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 of $0.5 million is included in the
other caption in other revenues (expenses).
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Capital is required to fund our investment activities and
operating expenses. We believe we currently have sufficient
access to capital resources and will continue to use a
significant
56
amount of our available capital resources to fund our existing
business plan. Our capital resources include cash on hand, cash
flow from operations, principal and interest payments received
from investments, borrowings under reverse repurchase
agreements, CDOs, junior subordinated debenture issuances, and
proceeds from stock offerings.
We held cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$42.6 million at March 31, 2007, which excludes
restricted cash of approximately $76.4 million that is used
to collateralize certain of our repurchase facilities and
certain other obligations.
Our operating activities provided net cash of approximately
$7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007
primarily as a result of net income of $7.5 million,
non-cash unrealized loss on derivatives of $8.6 million,
change in deferred income tax of $0.8 million, non-cash
impairment charges relating to available for sale securities of
$0.6 million, and decreases in interest receivable of
$2.7 million, offset in part by non-cash accretion of
discount on assets of $3.2 million, realized net gain on
sale of available for sale securities of $1.6 million,
payments on settlement of derivatives of $0.5 million and a
net decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, due to
Manager and interest payable of approximately $8.2 million.
Our operating activities provided net cash of approximately
$8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006
primarily as a result of net income of $15.4 million,
non-cash impairment charges relating to available for sale
securities of $1.3 million, and a net increase in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, due to Manager and interest
payable of approximately $3.0 million, offset in part by
non-cash unrealized gains on derivatives of $7.6 million,
non-cash accretion of discount on assets of $2.0 million
and an increase in interest receivable of $2.8 million.
Our investing activities provided net cash of
$186.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007 primarily from the sale of securities available for sale of
$512.2 million and principal repayments from available for
sale securities totaling $124.7 million, which was
partially offset by the purchase of securities available for
sale of $148.7 million, the payment of $234.7 million
relating to the acquisition of commercial real estate, the
funding of real estate loans of $14.9 million, the funding
of other investments totaling $35.0 million and the funding
of restricted cash for future security purchases relating to
CDO II of $16.5 million.
Our investing activities used net cash of $292.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 primarily from
the purchase of securities available for sale of
$595.5 million and the funding or purchase of real estate
loans and other investments totaling $6.9 million, which was
partially offset by receipt of principal payments on securities
available for sale and real estate loans of approximately
$111.7 million and $198.3 million of proceeds from the
sale of securities available for sale and the repayment of real
estate loans.
Our financing activities used net cash of $191.2 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 primarily from
the net repayment of borrowings under repurchase agreements,
including with related parties, of $753.7 million and
payments on the settlement of derivatives of $5.5 million, which
was partially offset by the issuance of CDO notes in the amount
of $325.0 million, proceeds from a mortgage note payable of
$198.5 million, proceeds from a trust preferred offering of
$50.0 million and proceeds from the settlement of
derivatives of $1.4 million.
Our financing activities provided net cash of
$284.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 primarily from the net proceeds from borrowings under
repurchase agreements, including with related parties, of
$390.1 million, partially offset by principal repayments on
CDOs of $16.3 million, repayment of a note payable to a
related party of $35.0 million and net deposits of
$52.8 million of restricted cash used to collateralize
certain financings.
Our source of funds as of March 31, 2007, excluding our
March 2005 and August 2006 common stock offerings and our March
2007 trust preferred offering, consisted of net proceeds
57
from repurchase agreements totaling approximately
$2,114.7 million with a weighted average current borrowing
rate of 5.50%, which we used to finance the acquisition of
securities available for sale, and proceeds from a mortgage
payable used to finance a portion of the purchase price for
commercial real estate. We expect to continue to borrow funds in
the form of repurchase agreements. As of the date of this
report, we have established 20 borrowing arrangements with
various investment banking firms and other lenders, 12 of which
were in use on March 31, 2007. Increases in short-term
interest rates could negatively affect the valuation of our
mortgage-related assets, which could limit our borrowing ability
or cause our lenders to initiate margin calls. Amounts due upon
maturity of our repurchase agreements will be funded primarily
through the rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements and
monthly principal and interest payments received on our
mortgage-backed securities.
For our short-term (one year or less) and long-term liquidity,
which includes investing and compliance with collateralization
requirements under our repurchase agreements (if the pledged
collateral decreases in value or in the event of margin calls
created by prepayments of the pledged collateral), we also rely
on the cash flow from operations, primarily monthly principal
and interest payments to be received on our mortgage-backed
securities, cash flow from the sale of securities, rental income
from our commercial real estate investments as well as any
primary securities offerings authorized by our board of
directors.
Based on our current portfolio, leverage rate and available
borrowing arrangements, including our $275.0 million master
repurchase facility with Wachovia Bank, we believe that the net
proceeds of our initial public offering, which closed in August
2006, and our first trust preferred offering, which closed in
March 2007, together with existing equity capital, combined with
the cash flow from operations and the utilization of borrowings,
will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated short-term
(one year or less) liquidity requirements such as to fund our
investment activities, pay fees under our management agreement,
fund our distributions to stockholders and pay general corporate
expenses. However, an increase in prepayment rates substantially
above our expectations could cause a temporary liquidity
shortfall due to the timing of the necessary margin calls on the
financing arrangements and the actual receipt of the cash
related to principal paydowns. If our cash resources are at any
time insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may
have to sell debt or additional equity securities. If required,
the sale of MBS or real estate loans at prices lower than their
carrying value would result in losses and reduced income.
Although we have achieved a leverage rate within our targeted
leverage range as of March 31, 2007, we have additional
capacity to leverage our equity further should the need for
additional short-term (one year or less) liquidity arise.
Our ability to meet our long-term (greater than one year)
liquidity and capital resource requirements in excess of our
borrowing capacity under our $275.0 million master
repurchase facility with Wachovia Bank will be subject to
obtaining additional debt financing and equity capital. We may
increase our capital resources by making public offerings of
equity securities, possibly including classes of preferred
stock, common stock, commercial paper, medium-term notes, CDOs,
collateralized mortgage obligations and senior or subordinated
notes. Such financing will depend on market conditions for
capital raises and for the investment of any proceeds. If we are
unable to renew, replace or expand our sources of financing on
substantially similar terms, it may have an adverse effect on
our business and results of operations. Upon liquidation,
holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and
lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a
distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our
common stock.
We generally seek to borrow between four and eight times the
amount of our equity. At March 31, 2007, our total debt was
approximately $2.9 billion, which represented a leverage
ratio of approximately 5.5 times.
58
In March 2007, our unconsolidated statutory trust, Crystal River
Preferred Trust I, issued $50.0 million of trust
preferred securities to a third party investor. The trust
preferred securities have a
30-year
term, maturing in April 2037, are redeemable at par on or after
April 2012 and pay interest at a fixed rate of 7.68% for the
first five years ending April 2012, and thereafter, at a
floating rate of three month LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
As of March 31, 2007, other than our investment in BREF
One, LLC, we did not maintain any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as
entities often referred to as structured finance, or
special-purpose or variable interest entities, established for
the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or
other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
March 31, 2007, we had outstanding commitments to fund real
estate construction loans of $24.1 million, and as of such
date, advances of $22.4 million had been made under these
commitments. As of March 31, 2007, we had outstanding
commitments to fund an investment in a private equity fund
totaling $3.9 million.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
As of March 15, 2005, we had entered into a management
agreement with Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River. Hyperion
Brookfield Crystal River is entitled to receive a base
management fee, incentive compensation, reimbursement of certain
expenses and, in certain circumstances, a termination fee, all
as described in the management agreement. Such fees and expenses
do not have fixed and determinable payments. The base management
fee is payable monthly in arrears in an amount equal to 1/12 of
our equity (as defined in the management agreement) times 1.50%.
Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River uses the proceeds from its
management fee in part to pay compensation to its officers and
employees who, notwithstanding that certain of them also are our
officers, receive no cash compensation directly from us.
Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River will receive quarterly
incentive compensation in an amount equal to the product of:
(a) 25% of the dollar amount by which (i) our
quarterly net income per share (determined in accordance with
the Management Agreement, which principally excludes the effect
of non-cash stock compensation expenses and the unrealized
change in derivatives) based on the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the quarter exceeds (ii) an
amount equal to (A) the weighted average of the price per
share of the common shares in the March 2005 private offering
and the prices per common shares in any subsequent offerings by
us (including our initial public offering that closed in August
2006), in each case at the time of issuance thereof, multiplied
by (B) the greater of (1) 2.4375% and (2) 0.50%
plus one-fourth of the Ten Year Treasury Rate for such quarter,
multiplied by (b) the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the quarter; provided, that the
foregoing calculation of incentive compensation shall be
adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP,
as well as non-cash charges after discussion between Hyperion
Brookfield Crystal River and our independent directors and
approval by a majority of our independent directors in the case
of non-cash charges. In accordance with the management
agreement, our Manager and the independent members of our board
of directors have agreed to adjust the calculation of the
Managers incentive fee to exclude non-cash adjustments
required by SFAS 133 relating to the valuation of interest
rate swaps, currency swaps and credit default swaps and to
exclude unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments
required by SFAS 52. See note 11 to our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere herein.
As of March 31, 2007, we had outstanding commitments to
fund real estate construction loans of $24.1 million, and
as of such date, advances of $22.4 million had been made
under these commitments. As of March 31, 2007, we had
outstanding commitments to fund an investment in a private
equity fund totaling $3.9 million.
59
We purchase and sell securities on a trade date that is prior to
the related settlement date. As of March 31, 2007, we owed
$80.5 million for our purchase of securities on or prior to
March 31, 2007 that settled after March 31, 2007.
The following table presents certain information regarding our
repurchase obligations as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
Repurchase
Agreement Counterparties
|
|
Amount at
Risk(1)
|
|
|
Agreement in
Days
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
$
|
5,276
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Bear, Stearns & Co.
Inc.
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
8,489
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Greenwich Capital Markets,
Inc.
|
|
|
8,226
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
14,812
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated
|
|
|
10,279
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Trilon International, Inc.
|
|
|
27,923
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
WaMu Capital Corp.
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
103,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equal to the fair value of collateral minus repurchase agreement
liabilities and accrued interest expense. |
The repurchase agreements for our repurchase facilities
generally do not include substantive provisions other than those
contained in the standard master repurchase agreement as
published by the Bond Market Association. As noted below, some
of our master repurchase agreements that were in effect as of
the date of this report contain negative covenants requiring us
to maintain certain levels of net asset value, tangible net
worth and available funds and comply with interest coverage
ratios, leverage ratios and distribution limitations. One of our
master repurchase agreements provides that it may be terminated
if, among other things, certain material decreases in net asset
value occur, our chief executive officer ceases to be involved
in the
day-to-day
operations of our Manager, we lose our REIT status or our
Manager is terminated. Generally, if we violate one of these
covenants, the counterparty to the master repurchase agreement
has the option to declare an event of default, which would
accelerate the repurchase date. If such option is exercised,
then all of our obligations would come due, including either
purchasing the securities or selling the securities, as the case
may be. The counterparty to the master repurchase agreement, if
the buyer in such transaction, for example, will be entitled to
keep all income paid after the exercise, which will be applied
to the aggregate unpaid repurchase price and any other amounts
owed by us, and we are required to deliver any purchased
securities to the counterparty.
Our master repurchase agreement with Banc of America Securities
LLC contains a restrictive covenant that requires our net asset
value to be no less than the higher of:
|
|
|
|
|
the NAV Floor (defined below) and
|
|
|
|
50% of our net asset value as of December 31 of the prior
year.
|
60
For 2007, the NAV Floor is approximately
$278.0 million. For all future periods, the NAV Floor is
equal to the higher of:
|
|
|
|
|
the NAV Floor and
|
|
|
|
50% of our net asset value,
|
in each case as of December 31 of the prior year.
Our master repurchase agreements with Credit Suisse First
Boston, LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston, (Europe) Limited
each contain a restrictive covenant that would trigger an event
of default if our net asset value declines:
|
|
|
|
|
by 30% or more from the highest net asset value in the preceding
12-month
period then ending,
|
|
|
|
by 20% or more from the highest net asset value in the preceding
three-month period then ending,
|
|
|
|
by 15% or more from the highest net asset value in the preceding
one-month period then ending, or
|
|
|
|
by 50% or more from the highest net asset value since the date
of the master repurchase agreement
|
or, if we or our Manager receive redemption notices that will
result in an net asset value drop to the foregoing levels or
below $175.0 million.
Our master repurchase agreement with Wachovia Bank, National
Association contains the following restrictive covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
We may not permit the ratio of the sum of adjusted EBITDA (as
defined in the master repurchase agreement) to interest expense
to be less than 1.25 to 1.00.
|
|
|
|
We may not permit our debt to equity ratio to be greater than
10:1.
|
|
|
|
We may not declare or make any payment on account of, or set
apart assets for, a sinking or other analogous fund for the
purchase, redemption, defeasance, retirement or other
acquisition of any of our equity interests, or make any other
distribution in respect thereof, either directly or indirectly,
whether in cash or property or in our obligations, except, so
long as there is no default, event of default or Margin
Deficit that has occurred and is continuing. We may
(i) make such payments solely to the extent necessary to
preserve our status as a REIT and (ii) make additional
payments in an amount equal to 100% of funds from operations. A
Margin Deficit occurs when the aggregate market value of all the
purchased securities subject to all repurchase transactions in
which a party is acting as buyer is less than the buyers
margin amount for all transactions, which is the amount obtained
by application of the buyers margin percentage to the
repurchase price. The margin percentage is a percentage agreed
to by the buyer and seller or the percentage obtained by
dividing the market value of the purchased securities on the
purchase date by the purchase price on the purchase date.
|
|
|
|
Our tangible net worth may not be less than the sum of
$300.0 million plus the proceeds from all subsequent equity
issuances, net of investment banking fees, legal fees,
accountants fees, underwriting discounts and commissions
and other customary fees and expenses that we actually incur.
|
|
|
|
We may not permit the amount of our cash and cash equivalents at
any time to be less than $15.0 million, after giving effect
to any requested repurchase transaction.
|
Certain of our repurchase agreements and our revolving credit
facility contain financial covenants, including maintaining our
REIT status and maintaining a specific net asset value or
61
worth. As of March 31, 2007, with respect to one debt
obligation, we failed to meet one financial covenant. We
obtained a waiver with respect to the financial covenant that
was not met. As a result, we were in compliance with or have
obtained the necessary waivers with respect to all our financial
covenants as of March 31, 2007.
We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions of
all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income to holders
of our common stock. In order to maintain our qualification as a
REIT and to avoid corporate-level income tax on the income we
distribute to our stockholders, we are required to distribute at
least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which includes net
short-term capital gains) on an annual basis. This requirement
can affect our liquidity and capital resources.
Impact of
Inflation
Our operating results depend in part on the difference between
the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and
the interest expense incurred in connection with our
interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the general level of
interest rates prevailing in the economy in response to changes
in the rate of inflation or otherwise can affect our income by
affecting the spread between our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, as well as, among other things,
the value of our interest-earning assets. Interest rates are
highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental
monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic
and political considerations, and other factors beyond our
control. We employ the use of correlated hedging strategies to
limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our
operations, including engaging in interest rate swaps to
minimize our exposure to changes in interest rates. There can be
no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect against
the foregoing risks or that we will ultimately realize an
economic benefit from any hedging contract into which we enter.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP
and our distributions are determined by our board of directors
consistent with our obligation to distribute to our stockholders
at least 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis in
order to maintain our REIT qualification; in each case, our
activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to
historical cost and or fair market value without considering
inflation.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The principal objective of our asset/liability management
activities is to maximize net interest income, while minimizing
levels of interest rate risk. Net interest income and interest
expense are subject to the risk of interest rate fluctuations.
To mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates, we use
interest rate swaps to effectively convert variable rate
liabilities to fixed rate liabilities for proper matching with
fixed rate assets. Each derivative used as a hedge is matched
with an asset or liability with which it has a high correlation.
The swap agreements are generally
held-to-maturity
and we do not use derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes. We use interest rate swaps to effectively convert
variable rate debt to fixed rate debt for the financed portion
of fixed rate assets. The differential to be paid or received on
these agreements is recognized as an adjustment to the interest
expense related to debt and is recognized on the accrual basis.
As of March 31, 2007, the primary component of our market
risk was interest rate risk, as described below. Although we do
not seek to avoid risk completely, we do believe the risk can be
quantified from historical experience and we seek to actively
manage that risk, to earn sufficient compensation to justify
taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent
with the risks we undertake.
Interest Rate RiskWe are subject to interest rate
risk in connection with most of our investments and our related
debt obligations, which are generally repurchase agreements of
62
limited duration that are periodically refinanced at current
market rates. We mitigate this risk through utilization of
derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swap agreements.
Yield Spread RiskMost of our investments are also
subject to yield spread risk. The majority of these securities
are fixed rate securities, which are valued based on a market
credit spread over the rate payable on fixed rate
U.S. Treasuries of like maturity. In other words, their
value is dependent on the yield demanded on such securities by
the market, as based on their credit relative to
U.S. Treasuries. An excessive supply of these securities
combined with reduced demand will generally cause the market to
require a higher yield on these securities, resulting in the use
of a higher or wider spread over the benchmark rate
(usually the applicable U.S. Treasury security yield) to
value these securities. Under these conditions, the value of our
real estate securities portfolio would tend to decrease.
Conversely, if the spread used to value these securities were to
decrease or tighten, the value of our real estate
securities would tend to increase. Such changes in the market
value of our real estate securities portfolio may affect our net
equity or cash flow either directly through their impact on
unrealized gains or losses on
available-for-sale
securities by diminishing our ability to realize gains on such
securities, or indirectly through their impact on our ability to
borrow and access capital.
Effect on Net Interest and Dividend IncomeWe fund
our investments with short-term borrowings under repurchase
agreements. During periods of rising interest rates, the
borrowing costs associated with those investments tend to
increase while the income earned on such investments could
remain substantially unchanged. This results in a narrowing of
the net interest spread between the related assets and
borrowings and may even result in losses.
On March 31, 2007, we were party to 33 interest rate swap
contracts and 3 interest rate cap contracts. The following table
summarizes the expiration dates of these contracts and their
notional amounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
135,000
|
|
2008
|
|
|
666,000
|
|
2009
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
2010
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
2011
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
51,494
|
|
2015
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
2016
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
2017
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
2018
|
|
|
240,467
|
|
2021
|
|
|
42,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,707,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of
prepayments of our fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS.
If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of
the RMBS will be longer or shorter, which would reduce the
effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause
losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the
use of derivative securities are highly complex and may produce
volatile returns.
Extension RiskWe invest in RMBS, some of which have
interest rates that are fixed for the first few years of the
loan (typically three, five, seven or 10 years) and
thereafter reset periodically on the same basis as
adjustable-rate RMBS. We compute the projected weighted
63
average life of our RMBS based on assumptions regarding the rate
at which the borrowers will prepay the underlying mortgages. In
general, when a fixed-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate residential
mortgage-backed security is acquired with borrowings, we may,
but are not required to, enter into an interest rate swap
agreement or other hedging instrument that effectively fixes our
borrowing costs for a period close to the anticipated average
life of the fixed-rate portion of the related RMBS. This
strategy is designed to protect us from rising interest rates
because the borrowing costs are fixed for the duration of the
fixed-rate portion of the related residential mortgage-backed
security.
However, if prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate
environment, the life of the fixed-rate portion of the related
RMBS could extend beyond the term of the swap agreement or other
hedging instrument. This could have a negative impact on our
results from operations, as borrowing costs would no longer be
fixed after the end of the hedging instrument while the income
earned on the RMBS would remain fixed. This situation may also
cause the market value of our RMBS to decline, with little or no
offsetting gain from the related hedging transactions. In
extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to maintain
adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur losses.
Hybrid Adjustable-Rate RMBS Interest Rate Cap
RiskWe also invest in hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS,
which are based on mortgages that are typically subject to
periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors, which limit
the amount by which the securitys interest yield may
change during any given period. However, our borrowing costs
pursuant to our repurchase agreements will not be subject to
similar restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing
interest rates, interest rate costs on our borrowings could
increase without limitation by caps, while the interest-rate
yields on our hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS would effectively be
limited by caps. This problem will be magnified to the extent we
acquire hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS that are not based on
mortgages which are fully indexed. In addition, the underlying
mortgages may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in
some portion of the interest being deferred and added to the
principal outstanding. This could result in our receipt of less
cash income on our hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS than we need in
order to pay the interest cost on our related borrowings. These
factors could lower our net interest income or cause a net loss
during periods of rising interest rates, which would harm our
financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Interest Rate Mismatch RiskWe intend to continue to
fund a substantial portion of our investments with borrowings
that, after the effect of hedging, have interest rates based on
indices and repricing terms similar to, but of somewhat shorter
maturities than, the interest rate indices and repricing terms
of our investments. Thus, we anticipate that in most cases the
interest rate indices and repricing terms of our mortgage assets
and our funding sources will not be identical, thereby creating
an interest rate mismatch between assets and liabilities.
Therefore, our cost of funds would likely rise or fall more
quickly than would our earnings rate on assets. During periods
of changing interest rates, such interest rate mismatches could
negatively impact our financial condition, cash flows and
results of operations. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we
may utilize hedging strategies discussed above.
Our analysis of risks is based on managements experience,
estimates, models and assumptions. These analyses rely on models
that utilize estimates of fair value and interest rate
sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or implementation of
investment decisions by our management may produce results that
differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in
our models and the projected results shown in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
Prepayment RiskPrepayments are the full or partial
repayment of principal prior to the original term to maturity of
a mortgage loan and typically occur due to refinancing of
mortgage loans. Prepayment rates for existing RMBS generally
increase when prevailing interest rates fall below the market
rate existing when the underlying mortgages were
64
originated. In addition, prepayment rates on adjustable-rate and
hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS generally increase when the
difference between long-term and short-term interest rates
declines or becomes negative. Prepayments of RMBS could harm our
results of operations in several ways. Some adjustable-rate
mortgages underlying our adjustable-rate RMBS may bear initial
teaser interest rates that are lower than their
fully-indexed rates, which refers to the applicable
index rates plus a margin. In the event that such an
adjustable-rate mortgage is prepaid prior to or soon after the
time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate, the holder of the
related RMBS would have held such security while it was less
profitable and lost the opportunity to receive interest at the
fully-indexed rate over the expected life of the adjustable-rate
RMBS. Additionally, we currently own mortgage assets that were
purchased at a premium. The prepayment of such assets at a rate
faster than anticipated would result in a write-off of any
remaining capitalized premium amount and a consequent reduction
of our net interest income by such amount. Finally, in the event
that we are unable to acquire new mortgage assets to replace the
prepaid assets, our financial condition, cash flow and results
of operations could be negatively affected.
Effect on Fair ValueAnother component of interest
rate risk is the effect changes in interest rates will have on
the market value of our assets. We face the risk that the market
value of our assets will increase or decrease at different rates
than that of our liabilities, including our hedging instruments.
We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the
duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities.
Duration essentially measures the market price volatility of
financial instruments as interest rates change. We generally
calculate duration using various financial models and empirical
data. Different models and methodologies can produce different
duration numbers for the same securities.
The following interest rate sensitivity analysis is measured
using an option-adjusted spread model combined with a
proprietary prepayment model. We shock the curve up and down
100 basis points and analyze the change in interest rates,
prepayments and cash flows through a Monte Carlo simulation. We
then calculate an average price for each scenario, which is used
in our risk management analysis.
65
The following sensitivity analysis table shows the estimated
impact on the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive
investments, repurchase agreement liabilities, CDO liabilities
and swaps, at March 31, 2007, assuming rates
instantaneously fall 100 basis points and rise
100 basis points:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
|
|
Fall 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rise 100
|
|
|
|
Basis
Points
|
|
|
Unchanged
|
|
|
Basis
Points
|
|
|
|
(dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage assets and other
securities available for sale
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
2,883,525
|
|
|
$
|
2,823,027
|
|
|
$
|
2,754,446
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
$
|
60,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(68,582
|
)
|
Change as a percent of fair value
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.43
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
262,573
|
|
|
$
|
251,694
|
|
|
$
|
240,278
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
$
|
10,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11,416
|
)
|
Change as a percent of fair value
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.54
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
investments(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
20,838
|
|
|
$
|
20,838
|
|
|
$
|
20,838
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Change as a percent of fair value
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
agreements(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
(2,114,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,114,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,114,734
|
)
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Change as a percent of fair value
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
(517,929
|
)
|
|
$
|
(516,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
(515,912
|
)
|
Change in fair value
|
|
$
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
983
|
|
Change as a percent of fair value
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
(51,550
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,550
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,550
|
)
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Change as a percent of fair value
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated and undesignated
interest rate swaps and caps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
(45,128
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,653
|
|
|
$
|
58,392
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
$
|
(52,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,739
|
|
Change as a percent of notional
value
|
|
|
(3.28
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps
(net)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
(5,915
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,526
|
)
|
Change in fair value
|
|
$
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
Change as a percent of notional
value
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swap
(net)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
(856
|
)
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
$
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,083
|
|
Change as a percent of notional
value
|
|
|
(1.94
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of other
available-for-sale
investments that are sensitive to interest rate changes are
included. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of our other investments that are sensitive to
interest rate changes are included. |
66
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The fair value of the repurchase agreements would not change
materially due to the short-term nature of these instruments. |
n/m = not meaningful
It is important to note that the impact of changing interest
rates on fair value can change significantly when interest rates
change beyond 100 basis points from current levels. Therefore,
the volatility in the fair value of our assets could increase
significantly when interest rates change beyond 100 basis
points. In addition, other factors affect the fair value of our
interest rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments,
such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to
future interest rate changes and other market conditions.
Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates,
the change in the fair value of our assets would likely differ
from that shown above, and such difference might be material and
adverse to our stockholders.
Currency RiskWe have foreign currency exposure
related to one commercial real estate loan that is denominated
in Canadian dollars and had a carrying value at March 31,
2007 of $43.3 million and one other investment that is
denominated in British pounds and had a carrying value at
March 31, 2007 of $21.4 million. From time to time, we
may make other investments that are denominated in a foreign
currency through which we may be subject to foreign currency
exchange risk.
Changes in currency rates can adversely affect the fair values
and earnings of our
non-U.S. holdings.
We attempt to mitigate this impact by utilizing currency swaps
on our foreign currency-denominated investments or foreign
currency forward commitments to hedge the net exposure.
Risk
Management
To the extent consistent with maintaining our REIT status, we
seek to manage our interest rate risk exposure to protect our
portfolio of RMBS and other mortgage securities and related debt
against the effects of major interest rate changes. We generally
seek to manage our interest rate risk by:
|
|
|
|
|
monitoring and adjusting, if necessary, the reset indices and
interest rates related to our MBS and our borrowings;
|
|
|
|
attempting to structure our borrowing agreements to have a range
of different maturities, terms, amortizations and interest rate
adjustment periods;
|
|
|
|
using derivatives, financial futures, swaps, options, caps,
floors and forward sales, to adjust the interest rate
sensitivity of our MBS and our borrowings; and
|
|
|
|
actively managing, on an aggregate basis, the interest rate
indices, interest rate adjustment periods, and gross reset
margins of our MBS and the interest rate indices and adjustment
periods of our borrowings.
|
Note on
Forward-Looking Statements
Except for historical information contained herein, this
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, which involve certain risks and uncertainties.
Forward-looking statements are included with respect to, among
other things, our current business plan, business and investment
strategy and portfolio management. These forward-looking
statements are identified by their use of such terms and phrases
as intends, intend,
intended, estimate,
estimates, expects, expect,
expected, project,
projected, projections,
anticipates, anticipated,
should, designed to, foreseeable
future, believe and believes and
similar
67
expressions. Our actual results or outcomes may differ
materially from those anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date the statement was made. We assume no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Important factors that we believe might cause actual results to
differ from any results expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements are discussed in the cautionary
statements contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this
Form 10-Q,
which are incorporated herein by reference. In assessing
forward-looking statements contained herein, readers are urged
to read carefully all cautionary statements contained in this
Form 10-Q.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
See the discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risk in the Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk section of Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations above.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on
the definition of disclosure controls and procedures
in
Rule 13a-15(e).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no matter how well a control
system is designed and operated, it can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures
within our Company to disclose material information otherwise
required to be set forth in our periodic reports. Also, we may
have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. Because we
do not control these entities, our disclosure controls and
procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily
substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect
to our consolidated subsidiaries.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end
of the period covered by this report.
Changes in
Internal Controls
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act) that occurred during the
period covered by this quarterly report that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
68
PART II.
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
None
There have been no material changes to the risk factors
previously disclosed in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed on
March 30, 2007 with the SEC. A copy of those risk factors,
updated for March 31, 2007, are attached as
Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon
Senior Securities
|
None
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Charter of Crystal River Capital,
Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File
No. 001-32958)
filed on March 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Crystal River Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 001-32958)
filed on May 14, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1(a)*
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale,
dated as of February 16, 2007, by and among CRZ Phoenix I
LLC, BREOF BNK Fannin LP and BREOF BNK Phoenix LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1(b)*
|
|
Partial Assignment Agreement,
dated as of March 19, 2007, by and between CRZ
Phoenix I LLC and CRZ Houston I LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture,
dated as of March 20, 2007, by Crystal River Capital, Inc.
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Amended and Restated
Trust Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2007, among
Crystal River Capital, Inc., The Bank of New York Trust Company,
National Association, as property trustee, The Bank of New York
(Delaware), as Delaware trustee, and certain officers of the
Company listed therein as administrative trustees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
.1
|
|
Statements regarding Computation
of Earnings per Share (Data required by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 128, Earnings per Share, is
provided in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements contained in this report)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Clifford E. Lai,
President and Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Craig J. Laurie,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Clifford E. Lai,
President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Craig J. Laurie,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
.1*
|
|
Risk Factors
|
* Filed herewith.
II-2
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CRYSTAL RIVER CAPITAL, INC.
Clifford E. Lai
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2007
Date
Craig J. Laurie
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
May 15, 2007
Date
II-3