OILT 3.31.2013 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
| |
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
or
|
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-35230
Oiltanking Partners, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 45-0684578 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
15631 Jacintoport Blvd. Houston, TX | | 77015 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 457-7900
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | |
Large accelerated filer | o | | Accelerated filer | þ |
| | | | |
Non-accelerated filer | o | | Smaller reporting company | o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 6, 2013, there were 19,449,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Assets: | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 14,918 |
| | $ | 7,071 |
|
Receivables: | | | |
Trade | 18,957 |
| | 12,160 |
|
Affiliates | 975 |
| | 615 |
|
Other | 243 |
| | 313 |
|
Note receivable, affiliate | — |
| | 28,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other | 495 |
| | 1,290 |
|
Total current assets | 35,588 |
| | 49,449 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net | 457,654 |
| | 418,289 |
|
Other assets, net | 1,434 |
| | 1,482 |
|
Total assets | $ | 494,676 |
| | $ | 469,220 |
|
Liabilities and partners’ capital: | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 32,803 |
| | $ | 29,399 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt, affiliate | 2,500 |
| | 2,500 |
|
Accounts payable, affiliates | 2,297 |
| | 2,049 |
|
Total current liabilities | 37,600 |
| | 33,948 |
|
Long-term debt, affiliate, less current maturities | 164,000 |
| | 146,800 |
|
Deferred revenue | 2,448 |
| | 2,544 |
|
Total liabilities | 204,048 |
| | 183,292 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
| |
|
|
Partners’ capital: | | | |
Common units (19,449,901 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012) | 250,011 |
| | 248,176 |
|
Subordinated units (19,449,901 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012) | 38,189 |
| | 36,354 |
|
General partner’s interest | 2,428 |
| | 1,398 |
|
Total partners’ capital | 290,628 |
| | 285,928 |
|
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 494,676 |
| | $ | 469,220 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Revenues | $ | 40,186 |
| | $ | 34,286 |
|
Costs and expenses: | | | |
Operating | 9,465 |
| | 9,627 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 4,997 |
| | 4,488 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 4,490 |
| | 3,966 |
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | — |
| | 13 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 18,952 |
| | 18,094 |
|
Operating income | 21,234 |
| | 16,192 |
|
Other income (expense): | | | |
Interest expense | (892 | ) | | (207 | ) |
Interest income | 3 |
| | 20 |
|
Other income | 2 |
| | 14 |
|
Total other expense, net | (887 | ) | | (173 | ) |
Income before income tax expense | 20,347 |
| | 16,019 |
|
Income tax expense | (155 | ) | | (80 | ) |
Net income | $ | 20,192 |
| | $ | 15,939 |
|
| | | |
Allocation of net income to partners: | | | |
Net income allocated to general partner | $ | 1,350 |
| | $ | 387 |
|
Net income allocated to common unitholders | $ | 9,421 |
| | $ | 7,776 |
|
Net income allocated to subordinated unitholders | $ | 9,421 |
| | $ | 7,776 |
|
| | | |
Earnings per limited partner unit: | | | |
Common unit (basic and diluted) | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
| | | |
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding: | | | |
Common units (basic and diluted) | 19,450 |
| | 19,450 |
|
Subordinated units (basic and diluted) | 19,450 |
| | 19,450 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 20,192 |
| | $ | 15,939 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 4,490 |
| | 3,966 |
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | — |
| | 13 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 46 |
| | 31 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | |
Trade and other receivables | (6,727 | ) | | (2,232 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 797 |
| | 729 |
|
Accounts receivable/payable, affiliates | (112 | ) | | (1,985 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (3,631 | ) | | (5,317 | ) |
Deferred revenue | 385 |
| | (444 | ) |
Total adjustments from operating activities | (4,752 | ) | | (5,239 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 15,440 |
| | 10,700 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Issuance of notes receivable, affiliate | — |
| | (16,000 | ) |
Collections of notes receivable, affiliate | 28,000 |
| | 14,300 |
|
Payments for purchase of property, plant and equipment | (37,301 | ) | | (6,990 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,301 | ) | | (8,690 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Borrowings under credit agreement, affiliate | 18,000 |
| | — |
|
Payments under notes payable, affiliate | (800 | ) | | (800 | ) |
Distributions paid to partners | (15,492 | ) | | (13,674 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,708 |
| | (14,474 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 7,847 |
| | (12,464 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents — Beginning of period | 7,071 |
| | 23,836 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents — End of period | $ | 14,918 |
| | $ | 11,372 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Limited Partners’ Interests | | |
| | General Partner’s Interest | | Common Units | | Subordinated Units | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance — January 1, 2013 | | $ | 1,398 |
| | $ | 248,176 |
| | $ | 36,354 |
| | $ | 285,928 |
|
Net income | | 1,350 |
| | 9,421 |
| | 9,421 |
| | 20,192 |
|
Cash distributions to partners | | (320 | ) | | (7,586 | ) | | (7,586 | ) | | (15,492 | ) |
Balance — March 31, 2013 | | $ | 2,428 |
| | $ | 250,011 |
| | $ | 38,189 |
| | $ | 290,628 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization
Oiltanking Partners, L.P. (“OILT”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed by Oiltanking Holding Americas, Inc. (“OTA”) on March 14, 2011 to engage in the storage, terminaling and transportation of crude oil, refined petroleum products and liquefied petroleum gas. OTA owns and controls OILT’s general partner, OTLP GP, LLC (“general partner”). Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Oiltanking Houston, L.P. (“OTH”) and Oiltanking Beaumont Partners, L.P. (“OTB”), OILT owns and operates storage and terminaling assets located along the Gulf Coast of the United States on the Houston, Texas Ship Channel and in Beaumont, Texas.
OTA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Oiltanking GmbH. Oiltanking GmbH and its subsidiaries, other than OILT and its subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as the “Oiltanking Group.” As used in this document, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” and similar terms refer to OILT and its subsidiaries, where applicable, unless the context indicates otherwise.
On July 19, 2011, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of 11,500,000 common units, including 1,500,000 common units issued in connection with the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at a price of $21.50 per unit. Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “OILT.” Through July 18, 2011, OTH and OTB were wholly owned subsidiaries of OTA. OTA and its affiliates contributed all of their equity interests in OTH and OTB to us on July 19, 2011, and in exchange, we issued an aggregate of 7,949,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units to OTA and its affiliates and incentive distribution rights to our general partner. At March 31, 2013, OTA owned our general partner, 7,949,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units.
At March 31, 2013, we had outstanding (i) 19,449,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units representing limited partner interests, (ii) a 2.0% general partner interest and (iii) incentive distribution rights. OTA and its affiliates hold 70.4% of all of our outstanding common and subordinated units (or a 69.0% limited partner interest), and other security holders hold the remaining 29.6% (or a 29.0% limited partner interest). The limited partners collectively hold a 98.0% limited partner interest in OILT, and the general partner holds a 2.0% general partner interest in OILT.
Basis of Presentation
Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year of 2013. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, which consist only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial statements have been omitted and, therefore, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions and information we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be perceived with certainty and, accordingly, these estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the operating environment changes. While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements are appropriate, actual results could differ from those estimates.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at a specified measurement date. Fair value measurements are derived using inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. GAAP establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value. This three-tier hierarchy classifies fair value amounts recognized or disclosed in the financial statements based on the observability of inputs used to estimate such fair values. The classification within the hierarchy of a financial asset or liability is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy considers fair value amounts based on observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) to be more reliable and predictable than those based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3). At each balance sheet reporting date, we categorize our financial assets and liabilities using this hierarchy.
Notes receivable, affiliate are reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at amounts which approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity of these financial instruments (Level 2). The carrying values of our fixed-rated debt approximate fair value based upon borrowing rates currently available to us for loans with similar terms (Level 2). The fair values of our variable-rate debt are their carrying amounts, as the carrying amount reasonably approximates fair value due to the variability of the interest rates. See Note 6 for further details of our fixed-rate and variable-rate debt.
We believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with the values that would be determined by other market participants. However, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
2. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We have engaged in certain transactions with other OTA subsidiaries, as well as other companies related to us by common ownership. Ongoing transactions include our provision of storage and ancillary services to these affiliates. Total charges for related party services were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Storage and ancillary service fees | $ | 710 |
| | $ | 794 |
|
Other charges | — |
| | 13 |
|
Total related party charges | $ | 710 |
| | $ | 807 |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we capitalized $1.0 million of related party engineering services into construction in progress. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we did not capitalize any related party engineering services into construction in progress.
At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total related party accounts receivable were $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Total related party accounts payable were $2.3 million and $2.0 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Additionally, we had $1.4 million and $0.1 million within accounts payable and accrued expenses at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, associated with related party administrative fees (see Note 4).
Long-term debt payable to Oiltanking Finance B.V., including both current and long-term portions, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $166.5 million and $149.3 million, respectively. Oiltanking Finance B.V. is a wholly owned finance company of Oiltanking GmbH that serves as the global financing division for the Oiltanking Group’s terminal holdings, including us, and arranges loans and notes at market rates and terms for approved terminal construction projects.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total interest and commitment fees payable to Oiltanking Finance B.V. under term loans and credit financing arrangements of $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses (see Note 4).
From time to time, we invest cash with Oiltanking Finance B.V. in short-term notes receivable at then-prevailing market rates. At December 31, 2012, we had short-term notes receivable of $28.0 million from Oiltanking Finance B.V., bearing an interest rate of 0.51%. At March 31, 2013, we had no short-term notes receivable outstanding.
The following table summarizes related party operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses, interest expense and interest income reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Operating | $ | 3,581 |
| | $ | 3,122 |
|
Selling, general and administrative (1) | 3,989 |
| | 3,972 |
|
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized) | 885 |
| | 201 |
|
Interest income | 3 |
| | 20 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | We incurred $4.0 million of selling, general and administrative expenses under the Services Agreement during each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 include $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of costs from OTA related to ongoing maintenance costs for an invoicing and inventory computer system that are reimbursable under the Services Agreement but not included in the annual fixed fee (see below). |
Transactions with a Certain Director
One of the directors of our general partner, David L. Griffis, is employed by and a shareholder of the law firm of Crain, Caton & James, P.C., a firm that provides legal counsel to us, as well as to OTA and certain of its other affiliates. Fees for legal services paid to Crain, Caton & James, P.C. for services to us totaled $0.5 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Agreements with Affiliates
Services Agreement. On July 19, 2011, in connection with our IPO, we entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with our general partner and Oiltanking North America, LLC (“OTNA”), a subsidiary of OTA, and subsequently amended the Services Agreement in December 2011, pursuant to which OTNA agreed to provide us certain specified selling, general and administrative services necessary to manage our business for an annual fixed fee, payable in equal monthly installments. We also agreed to reimburse OTNA for all operating expenses and all expenses it incurs as a result of our becoming a publicly traded partnership, including all operating expenses it incurs with respect to insurance coverage for our business, with such reimbursement obligations not subject to any cap.
The initial term of the Services Agreement is ten years, and it will automatically renew for additional twelve-month periods following the expiration of the initial term unless and until either we or OTNA provide 180 days written notice of intent to terminate the agreement. During the initial term or any renewal term, the annual fixed fee related to selling, general and administrative expenses will be adjusted as necessary each year to account for inflation as measured by the consumer price index. In addition, with the approval of the Conflicts Committee of the board of directors of our general partner, the fee may be adjusted to account for growth in our business or asset base. For 2013, the annual fixed fee was increased to $15.1 million as a result of an increase in the consumer price index.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Land | $ | 23,340 |
| | $ | 23,340 |
|
Production and terminal facilities | 546,189 |
| | 460,209 |
|
Rights-of-way | 30 |
| | 30 |
|
Construction in progress | 94,751 |
| | 136,876 |
|
Total property, plant and equipment | 664,310 |
| | 620,455 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | (206,656 | ) | | (202,166 | ) |
Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 457,654 |
| | $ | 418,289 |
|
Depreciation expense was $4.5 million and $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Interest costs capitalized as part of the costs of construction in progress were $1.1 million and $0.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Accounts payable, trade | $ | 6,414 |
| | $ | 7,891 |
|
Accrued capital expenditures | 19,286 |
| | 12,732 |
|
Accrued property taxes | 1,689 |
| | 4,987 |
|
Accrued sales and other taxes | 207 |
| | 207 |
|
Related party interest and commitment fees payable | 1,949 |
| | 611 |
|
Related party administrative fees payable | 1,427 |
| | 60 |
|
Deferred revenue | 1,520 |
| | 1,039 |
|
Other | 311 |
| | 1,872 |
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 32,803 |
| | $ | 29,399 |
|
5. DEFERRED REVENUE
During 2007, we entered into a modification of a lease as a lessor and received a one-time upfront rental payment of $2.5 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, which is approximately sixteen years. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, deferred revenue related to this upfront rental payment was $1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of which $0.2 million at each date was current and included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
During 2010, we entered into a modification of a revenue agreement and received a one-time payment of $2.0 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement, which is approximately nine years. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, deferred revenue related to this one-time payment was $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of which $0.2 million at each date was current and included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of current deferred revenue related to a customer throughput and deficiency agreement.
6. DEBT
Long-term debt, affiliate, consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
6.78% Note due 2019 – OTH | $ | 6,300 |
| | $ | 6,300 |
|
7.45% Note due 2019 – OTB | 5,200 |
| | 5,600 |
|
7.02% Note due 2020 – OTB | 6,000 |
| | 6,400 |
|
4.55% OTH Loan Agreement, due 2022 | 125,000 |
| | 125,000 |
|
OILT Credit Agreement, due 2017 | 24,000 |
| | 6,000 |
|
Total debt | 166,500 |
| | 149,300 |
|
Less current portion | (2,500 | ) | | (2,500 | ) |
Total long-term debt, affiliate | $ | 164,000 |
| | $ | 146,800 |
|
At March 31, 2013, our covenants restrict us from declaring distributions in excess of approximately $153.0 million.
OTH and OTB Notes
At March 31, 2013, we have three outstanding Notes with Oiltanking Finance B.V. Two of the outstanding Notes with Oiltanking Finance B.V. contain loan covenants that require OTB to maintain certain debt, leverage and equity ratios and prohibit OTB from pledging its assets to third parties or incurring any indebtedness other than from Oiltanking Finance B.V. without its consent. At March 31, 2013, no assets had been pledged to third parties. The loan covenants in these agreements require OTB to maintain certain Financial Parameters (as such term is defined in the Note agreements), including: (i) a ratio of Stockholders’ Equity to non-current assets of 30% or greater, (ii) a ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt Service of 1.2 or greater and (iii) a ratio of Net Financial Indebtedness to EBITDA of 3.75 or less (as such terms are defined in the Note agreements). At March 31, 2013, OTB’s ratio of Stockholders’ Equity to non-current assets, the ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt Service and the ratio of Net Financial Indebtedness to EBITDA (as such terms are defined in the Note agreements) was 84.0%, 7.7 and 1.11, respectively. At March 31, 2013, OTB was in compliance with all covenants under the respective Note agreements.
OILT Credit Agreement
On November 7, 2012, OILT entered into Addendum No. 2 to its unsecured revolving line of credit agreement with Oiltanking Finance B.V. to increase the amount of the revolving credit commitment from $50.0 million to $150.0 million and to extend the maturity date from June 30, 2013 to November 30, 2017 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). From time to time upon OILT’s written request and in the sole determination of Oiltanking Finance B.V., the revolving credit commitment can be increased up to an additional $75.0 million, for a maximum revolving credit commitment of $225.0 million. Borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.65% to 2.50% depending upon a leverage-based grid. Any unused portion of the revolving line of credit is subject to a commitment fee of 0.35% per annum. At March 31, 2013, OILT had $24.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement at a weighted average interest rate of 2.18% per annum.
The Credit Agreement requires OILT to maintain, on an calendar year basis, certain Financial Parameters (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement), including: (i) a ratio of Stockholders’ Equity to non-current assets of 30% or greater, (ii) a ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt Service of 1.2 or greater and (iii) a ratio of Net Financial Indebtedness to EBITDA of 3.75 or less (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreement). At March 31, 2013, OILT’s ratio of Stockholders’ Equity to non-current assets, the ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt Service and the ratio of Net Financial
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Indebtedness to EBITDA (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreement) was 63.0%, 19.1 and 1.76, respectively. At March 31, 2013, OILT was in compliance with all covenants contained in the Credit Agreement.
OTH Loan Agreement
On May 16, 2012, OTH entered into a ten-year $125.0 million unsecured loan agreement with Oiltanking Finance B.V. (the “Loan Agreement”) for the purpose of financing the purchase of property, plant and equipment, through which borrowings were available through December 15, 2012 (the “Availability Period”), with a maturity date of December 15, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”). At March 31, 2013, OTH had $125.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Loan Agreement at a fixed interest rate of 4.55% per annum.
The Loan Agreement requires OTH to maintain certain Financial Parameters (as such term is defined in the Loan Agreement), including: (i) a ratio of Stockholders’ Equity to non-current assets of 30% or greater, (ii) a ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt Service of 1.2 or greater, and (iii) a ratio of Net Financial Indebtedness to EBITDA of 3.75 or less (as such terms are described in the Loan Agreement). The Loan Agreement also contains covenants restricting the ability of OTH to take certain actions without the consent of Oiltanking Finance B.V., including (i) incurring additional indebtedness, (ii) pledging its assets, or (iii) amending its organizational documents. The Loan Agreement contains customary borrowing conditions and events of default, including events of default triggered by (i) OTH failing to satisfy the Financial Parameters and other covenants described in this paragraph after more than 30 days’ notice, (ii) OTH failing to repay borrowings under the Loan Agreement when they become due, and (iii) OTH ceasing to be controlled by Oiltanking GmbH. At March 31, 2013, OTH’s ratio of Stockholders’ Equity to non-current assets, the ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt Service and the ratio of Net Financial Indebtedness to EBITDA (as such terms are defined in the Loan Agreement) was 57.0%, 35.0 and 1.85, respectively. At March 31, 2013, OTH was in compliance with all covenants contained in the Loan Agreement.
7. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Outstanding Units
At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had outstanding 19,449,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units representing limited partner units.
Distributions
Our partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date.
The following table details the distributions paid during or pertaining to the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands, except per unit amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Common and | | General | | Incentive | | | | Distributions |
| | Date Paid | | Subordinated | | Partner’s | | Distribution | | | | per Limited |
Date Declared | | or To Be Paid | | Units | | 2% Interest | | Rights | | Total | | Partner Unit |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 22, 2013 | | February 14, 2013 | | $ | 15,171 |
| | $ | 310 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 15,492 |
| | $ | 0.39 |
|
April 22, 2013 | | May 14, 2013 | | $ | 15,754 |
| | $ | 324 |
| | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 16,178 |
| | $ | 0.405 |
|
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash each quarter in the following manner:
| |
• | first, 98.0% to the holders of our common units and 2.0% to our general partner, until each common unit has received the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3375 plus any arrearages from prior quarters; and |
| |
• | second, 98.0% to the holders of our subordinated units and 2.0% to our general partner, until each subordinated unit has received the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3375. |
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The general partner’s incentive distribution rights provide that if cash distributions to our unitholders exceed $0.38813 per common unit and subordinated unit in any quarter, our unitholders and our general partner will receive, including its 2.0% general partner interest, distributions according to the following percentage allocations:
|
| | | | | |
| Target Quarterly Distribution Target Amount | | Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions |
| | Unitholders | | General Partner |
Minimum quarterly distribution | $0.3375 | | 98.0% | | 2.0% |
First target distribution | above $0.3375 up to $0.38813 | | 98.0% | | 2.0% |
Second target distribution | above $0.38813 up to $0.42188 | | 85.0% | | 15.0% |
Third target distribution | above $0.42188 up to $0.50625 | | 75.0% | | 25.0% |
Thereafter | above $0.50625 | | 50.0% | | 50.0% |
Our general partner, as the initial holder of all of our incentive distribution rights, has the right, at any time when there are no subordinated units outstanding and it has received incentive distributions at the highest level to which it is entitled (48.0%, in addition to distributions paid on its 2.0% general partner interest) for each of the prior four consecutive whole fiscal quarters, to reset the initial target distribution levels at higher levels based on our cash distributions at the time of the exercise of the reset election. If our general partner transfers all or a portion of the incentive distribution rights in the future, then the holder or holders of a majority of our incentive distribution rights will be entitled to exercise this right. The following assumes that our general partner holds all of the incentive distribution rights at the time that a reset election is made. Following a reset election, the minimum quarterly distribution will be adjusted to equal the reset minimum quarterly distribution, and the target distribution levels will be reset to correspondingly higher levels based on the same percentage increases above the reset minimum quarterly distribution as the current target distribution levels.
If our general partner elects to reset the target distribution levels, it will be entitled to receive a number of common units and a general partner interest necessary to maintain its general partner interest in us immediately prior to the reset election. The number of common units to be issued to our general partner will equal the number of common units that would have entitled the holder to an average aggregate quarterly cash distribution in the prior two quarters equal to the average of the distributions to our general partner on the incentive distribution rights in such prior two quarters.
Subordinated Units
All of our subordinated units are owned directly or indirectly by OTA. The principal difference between our common units and subordinated units is that in any quarter during the subordination period, holders of the subordinated units are not entitled to receive any distribution until the common units have received the minimum quarterly distribution (defined below) plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior quarters. Subordinated units will not accrue arrearages.
The subordination period will end on the first business day after we have earned and paid at least: (i) $1.35 (the minimum quarterly distribution on an annualized basis) on each outstanding common unit and subordinated unit and the corresponding distribution on our general partner’s 2.0% interest for each of three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods ending on or after September 30, 2014; or (ii) $2.025 (150.0% of the annualized minimum quarterly distribution) on each outstanding common unit and subordinated unit and the corresponding distribution on our general partner’s 2.0% interest and the related distribution on the incentive distribution rights for the four-quarter period immediately preceding that date, in each case provided there are no arrearages on our common units at that time.
The subordination period also will end upon the removal of our general partner other than for cause if no subordinated units or common units held by the holder(s) of subordinated units or their affiliates are voted in favor of that removal.
When the subordination period ends, all subordinated units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and thereafter no common units will be entitled to arrearages.
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
8. EARNINGS PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the periods indicated (amounts in thousands, except per unit data):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Net income | $ | 20,192 |
| | $ | 15,939 |
|
| | | |
Less: General partner’s incentive distribution earned (1) | 946 |
| | 68 |
|
Less: General partner’s 2.0% ownership interest | 404 |
| | 319 |
|
Net income allocated to limited partners | $ | 18,842 |
| | $ | 15,552 |
|
| | | |
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit: | | | |
Allocation of net income among limited partner interests: | | | |
Net income allocable to common units | $ | 9,421 |
| | $ | 7,776 |
|
Net income allocable to subordinated units | 9,421 |
| | 7,776 |
|
Net income allocated to limited partners | $ | 18,842 |
| | $ | 15,552 |
|
| | | |
Denominator: | | | |
Basic and diluted weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding: | | | |
Common units | 19,450 |
| | 19,450 |
|
Subordinated units | 19,450 |
| | 19,450 |
|
| | | |
Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit: | | | |
Common units | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
Subordinated units | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Based on the amount of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, our general partner was allocated income associated with its incentive distribution rights for this period. Undistributed earnings (net income in excess of distributions) or undistributed losses (distributions in excess of net income) are allocated to the general partner and limited partners based on their respective ownership interests. Cash payments made to our general partner and limited partners are determined in relation to actual distributions declared and are not based on the net income allocations used in the calculation of earnings per unit. |
9. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flows and non-cash transactions were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Cash paid for interest of $581 and $552 (net of capitalized interest) | $ | (497 | ) | | $ | 288 |
|
Interest costs capitalized | 1,078 |
| | 264 |
|
| | | |
Non-cash transactions: | | | |
Increase in accounts payable related to capital expenditures | $ | 6,554 |
| | $ | — |
|
OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. SEGMENT REPORTING
We derive our revenues from two operating segments — OTH and OTB. The two operating segments have been aggregated into one reportable business segment because they have similar long-term economic characteristics, types and classes of customers and provide similar services.
Revenues by service category are as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Storage service fees | $ | 27,958 |
| | $ | 24,294 |
|
Throughput fees | 10,488 |
| | 6,881 |
|
Ancillary service fees | 1,740 |
| | 3,111 |
|
Total revenues | $ | 40,186 |
| | $ | 34,286 |
|
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, we may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings, some of which are covered in whole or in part by insurance. We may not be able to predict the timing or outcome of these or future claims and proceedings with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Currently, we are not party to any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Liabilities
We may experience releases of crude oil, petroleum products and fuels, liquid petroleum gas or other contaminants into the environment, or discover past releases that were previously unidentified. Although we maintain an inspection program designed to prevent and, as applicable, to detect and address such releases promptly, damages and liabilities incurred due to any such environmental releases from our assets may affect our business. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we have not identified any environmental obligations that would require accrual in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Commitments
We have certain short-term purchase obligations and commitments for products and services, primarily related to construction on our expansion projects. At March 31, 2013, we have commitments of approximately $17.0 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.
Other
Our liquid storage and transport systems may experience damage as a result of an accident, natural disaster or terrorist activity. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, and equipment, pollution or environmental damage and suspension of operations. We maintain insurance of various types that we consider adequate to cover our operations and properties. The insurance covers our assets in amounts we consider reasonable. The insurance policies are subject to deductibles that we consider reasonable and not excessive. Our insurance does not cover every potential risk associated with operating our facilities, including the potential loss of significant revenues.
The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured, indemnified or reserved against, or the failure of a party to meet its indemnification obligations, could materially and adversely affect our operations and financial condition.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following information should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report as well as the consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“Annual Report”).
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition, or forecasts of future events. Words such as “may,” “assume,” “forecast,” “position,” “predict,” “strategy,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” “budget,” “potential,” or “continue,” and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be affected by assumptions used or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results may vary materially from such forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. You should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and should not consider the following list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties.
Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to: (i) changes in general economic conditions; (ii) competitive conditions in our industry; (iii) changes in the long-term supply and demand of crude oil, refined petroleum products and liquefied petroleum gas in the markets in which we operate; (iv) actions taken by our customers, competitors and third-party operators; (v) changes in the availability and cost of capital; (vi) operating hazards, natural disasters, weather-related delays, casualty losses and other matters beyond our control; (vii) the effects of existing and future laws and governmental regulations; and (viii) the effects of future litigation. These and other risks are described in this Quarterly Report and our Annual Report. In addition, we may be subject to unforeseen risks that may have a materially adverse effect on us. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the actual events and results will not be materially different than the anticipated results described in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and, other than as required by federal and state securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.
Overview of Business
Oiltanking Partners, L.P. (“OILT”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed by Oiltanking Holding Americas, Inc. (“OTA”) on March 14, 2011 to engage in the storage, terminaling and transportation of crude oil, refined petroleum products and liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”). OTA owns and controls OILT’s general partner, OTLP GP, LLC (our “general partner”). Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Oiltanking Houston, L.P. (“OTH”) and Oiltanking Beaumont Partners, L.P. (“OTB”), OILT owns and operates storage and terminaling assets located along the Gulf Coast of the United States on the Houston, Texas Ship Channel and in Beaumont, Texas. We report in one business segment.
OTA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Oiltanking GmbH. Oiltanking GmbH and its subsidiaries, other than OILT and its subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as the “Oiltanking Group.” As used in this document, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” and similar terms refer to OILT and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
On July 19, 2011, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of 11,500,000 common units, including 1,500,000 common units issued in connection with the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at a price of $21.50 per unit. Through July 18, 2011, OTH and OTB were wholly owned subsidiaries of OTA. OTA and its affiliates contributed all of their equity interests in OTH and OTB to us on July 19, 2011, and in exchange, we issued an aggregate of 7,949,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units to OTA and its affiliates, and issued incentive distribution
rights to our general partner. At March 31, 2013, OTA owned our general partner, 7,949,901 common units and 19,449,901 subordinated units.
Our primary business objective is to generate stable cash flows to enable us to pay quarterly distributions to our unitholders and to increase our quarterly cash distributions over time. We intend to achieve this objective by anticipating long-term infrastructure needs in the areas we serve and by growing our tank terminal network and pipelines through construction in new markets, the expansion of existing facilities and strategic acquisitions.
We operate crude oil and refined petroleum products terminals on the Houston, Texas Ship Channel and in Beaumont, Texas. Our Beaumont terminal serves as a regional hub for refined petroleum products for refineries located in the Gulf Coast region. At March 31, 2013, our Houston facility has an aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 12.9 million barrels and provides integrated terminaling services to a variety of customers, including major integrated oil companies, marketers, distributors and chemical companies. At March 31, 2013, our Beaumont facility has an aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 5.6 million barrels and provides integrated terminaling services to a variety of customers, including major integrated oil companies, distributors, marketers and chemical and petrochemical companies.
Recent Developments
Expansion Projects and Assets Placed Into Service
In November 2011, we announced approval of expansion projects of approximately $85.0 million to construct two new crude oil pipelines along the Houston Ship Channel and approximately one million barrels of new crude oil storage capacity at our Houston terminal. During the first quarter of 2012, the board of directors approved an additional $11.0 million of spending to extend the pipeline expansion into a third-party terminal in Houston. During January 2013, we placed this pipeline expansion project into service. In addition, in February 2013, we placed three new crude oil storage tanks with a total capacity of 825,000 barrels into service at our Houston terminal. The final 275,000 barrel tank of this four tank expansion project is expected to be placed into service in the second quarter of 2013. In Beaumont, during the first quarter of 2013, we completed construction on and placed into service two new refined products storage tanks with total capacity of 325,000 barrels.
Dock Expansion Project
In March 2013, we announced an expansion of our relationship with Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (“Enterprise”) and plans to increase our ability to import and export LPG at our terminal on the Houston Ship Channel. In connection with the agreement with Enterprise, we will construct a new vessel dock and add infrastructure to existing docks with the capability of handling substantially more LPG vessels at multiple docks. During the term of the agreement, we have also agreed to provide vessel-based LPG import and export services on the Houston Ship Channel exclusively to Enterprise, and Enterprise has agreed to exclusively use our facility for its vessel-based imports and exports of LPG on the Houston Ship Channel. The estimated $44.0 million expansion project is expected to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2014.
Management Changes
On March 15, 2013, Edward J. O’Neal, Jr. was appointed by the board of directors of our general partner to serve as Vice President of Human Resources.
Distribution Declaration
On April 22, 2013, the board of directors of our general partner declared a cash distribution to our unitholders of $0.405 per unit and a corresponding distribution on our general partner’s interest, payable on May 14, 2013 to unitholders of record at the close of business on May 3, 2013.
Results of Operations
Our operating results were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per unit amounts):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Revenues | $ | 40,186 |
| | $ | 34,286 |
|
Costs and expenses: | | | |
Operating | 9,465 |
| | 9,627 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 4,997 |
| | 4,488 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 4,490 |
| | 3,966 |
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | — |
| | 13 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 18,952 |
| | 18,094 |
|
Operating income | 21,234 |
| | 16,192 |
|
Other income (expense): | | | |
Interest expense | (892 | ) | | (207 | ) |
Interest income | 3 |
| | 20 |
|
Other income | 2 |
| | 14 |
|
Total other expense, net | (887 | ) | | (173 | ) |
Income before income tax expense | 20,347 |
| | 16,019 |
|
Income tax expense | (155 | ) | | (80 | ) |
Net income | $ | 20,192 |
| | $ | 15,939 |
|
| | | |
Earnings per common unit – basic and diluted | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
Earnings per subordinated unit – basic and diluted | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax (expense) benefit, depreciation and amortization expense and other income, as further adjusted to exclude certain other non-cash and non-recurring items, which included gains and losses on disposal of fixed assets for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Adjusted EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess: (i) our financial performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in the midstream energy industry, without regard to historical cost basis or financing methods, (ii) the viability of proposed projects and acquisitions and (iii) the overall rates of return on investment in various opportunities. Accordingly, we believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors in assessing our results of operations.
The GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA is net income. Our non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP measures, such as net income, operating income, cash flow from operating activities or any other GAAP measure of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes some but not all items that affect net income. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from net income: | | | |
Net income | $ | 20,192 |
| | $ | 15,939 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 4,490 |
| | 3,966 |
|
Income tax expense | 155 |
| | 80 |
|
Interest expense, net | 889 |
| | 187 |
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | — |
| | 13 |
|
Other income | (2 | ) | | (14 | ) |
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 25,724 |
| | $ | 20,171 |
|
Operating Data
The following table presents operating data for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Storage capacity, end of period (mmbbls) (1) (3) | 18.5 |
| | 17.3 |
|
Storage capacity, average (mmbbls) (3) | 18.2 |
| | 17.3 |
|
Terminal throughput (mbpd) (2) | 881.3 |
| | 846.2 |
|
Vessels per period | 194 |
| | 229 |
|
Barges per period | 831 |
| | 773 |
|
Trucks per period | 5,238 |
| | 2,751 |
|
Rail cars per period | 1,638 |
| | 2,288 |
|
_______________________
| |
(1) | Represents million barrels (“mmbbls”). |
| |
(2) | Represents thousands of barrels per day (“mbpd”). |
| |
(3) | During the first quarter of 2013, we placed into service net storage capacity of approximately 0.9 million barrels. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $5.6 million, or 27.5%, to $25.7 million from $20.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily attributable to increased revenues of $5.9 million and decreased operating expenses of $0.2 million, partially offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A expenses”) of $0.5 million.
Revenues. Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $5.9 million, or 17.2%, to $40.2 million from $34.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily attributable to an increase in storage service fee revenues of $3.7 million and higher throughput fee revenue of $3.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in ancillary services fee revenue of $1.4 million. Increased storage service fee revenues were attributable to additional revenues from new storage capacity placed into service in April 2012 and in the first quarter of 2013 and an escalation in the average storage fee charged. Increased throughput fee revenue was primarily attributable to revenues of approximately $1.9 million generated on our pipelines recently placed into service, increased LPG exports during the 2013 period which increased revenues by approximately $1.5 million and revenues from our new revenue arrangement
with Enterprise. Ancillary service fee revenue in the 2012 period included approximately $1.4 million of revenues from a pipeline-related construction project for a customer that was completed and recognized during the 2012 period.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 decreased by $0.2 million, or 1.7%, to $9.5 million from $9.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to a decrease of $1.4 million in expenses associated with the pipeline-related construction project which occurred in the 2012 period discussed above, a decrease of $0.2 million in rental expense due to the purchase of previously leased land for our expansion projects and a decrease of $0.1 million in power and fuel costs due to re-negotiated power rates at a lower rate. These decreases in operating expenses were partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million in operations employee-related costs incurred by OTA and charged to us under the Services Agreement due to increases in benefit costs and higher operational labor in the 2013 period, an increase of $0.4 million in repairs and maintenance costs, an increase of $0.3 million in property taxes resulting from increased property values, an increase of $0.2 million in legal, engineering and permitting and licensing fees and an increase of $0.1 million in insurance costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $0.5 million, or 11.3%, to $5.0 million from $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in SG&A expenses in the 2013 period was primarily due to higher accounting, auditing and professional fees.
Depreciation Expense. Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $0.5 million, or 13.2%, to $4.5 million from $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to assets placed in service in 2012 and in the 2013 period.
Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we did not recognize any losses on the disposal of fixed assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recognized losses of less than $0.1 million on the disposal of certain dismantled terminal assets.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $0.7 million, or 330.9%, to $0.9 million from $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to higher outstanding borrowings as a result of the increased construction activity, partially offset by higher interest capitalized on construction projects.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $0.1 million, or 93.8%, to $0.2 million from $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, due to an increase in accruals for Texas margin tax.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Our principal liquidity requirements are to finance current operations, fund capital expenditures, including acquisitions from time to time, service our debt and pay distributions to our partners. Our sources of liquidity may include cash generated by our operations, borrowings under our revolving line of credit and issuances of equity and debt securities. We believe cash generated from these sources will be sufficient to meet our obligations as they come due.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we paid cash distributions totaling $15.5 million, or $0.39 per unit, and corresponding distributions on our general partner’s interest and incentive distribution rights, to unitholders. On April 22, 2013, the board of directors of our general partner declared a cash distribution to our unitholders of $0.405 per unit for the first quarter of 2013, and a corresponding distribution on our general partner’s interest and incentive distribution rights. The first quarter 2013 cash distribution totaling approximately $16.2 million is expected to be paid on May 14, 2013 to unitholders of record at the close of business on May 3, 2013. The first quarter 2013 cash distribution represents a 3.8% increase over the fourth quarter 2012 cash distribution of $0.39 per unit and a 15.7% increase over
the first quarter of 2012 cash distribution of $0.35 per unit. We intend to continue to pay a quarterly distribution based on the number of common and subordinated units and the general partner interest outstanding to the extent we have sufficient cash from our operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner and its affiliates.
On April 16, 2012, we announced approval of an expansion project of approximately $104.0 million to construct approximately 3.2 million barrels of new crude oil storage capacity near our Houston terminal. The project included the purchase of 95 acres of nearby land on which the new capacity is being constructed. The additional storage capacity is expected to be placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2013.
On September 4, 2012, we announced approval of an expansion project of approximately $70.0 million to construct approximately 3.3 million barrels of new crude oil storage capacity near our Houston terminal. The additional storage capacity is expected to be placed into service during the third and fourth quarters of 2014.
In March 2013, we announced an expansion of our relationship with Enterprise and plans to increase our ability to import and export LPG at our terminal on the Houston Ship Channel. In connection with the agreement with Enterprise, we will construct a new vessel dock and add infrastructure to existing docks with the capability of handling substantially more LPG vessels at multiple docks. During the term of the agreement, we have also agreed to provide vessel-based LPG import and export services on the Houston Ship Channel exclusively to Enterprise, and Enterprise has agreed to exclusively use our facility for its vessel-based imports and exports of LPG on the Houston Ship Channel. The estimated $44.0 million expansion project is expected to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2014.
We anticipate funding these projects primarily with cash on hand and long-term borrowings from Oiltanking Finance B.V.
OILT Credit Agreement
Our credit agreement with Oiltanking Finance B.V., which we amended in November 2012, is a $150.0 million credit agreement with a maturity date of November 30, 2017 (“Credit Agreement”). From time to time upon our written request and in the sole determination of Oiltanking Finance B.V., the revolving credit commitment can be increased up to an additional $75.0 million, for a maximum revolving credit commitment of $225.0 million. Borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.65% to 2.50% depending upon a leverage-based grid. Any unused portion of the revolving line of credit is subject to a commitment fee of 0.35% per annum. As of March 31, 2013, we had $24.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement at a weighted average interest rate of 2.18% per annum.
OTH Loan Agreement
OTH has a ten-year $125.0 million unsecured loan agreement with Oiltanking Finance B.V. (the “Loan Agreement”) for the purpose of financing the purchase of property, plant and equipment, through which borrowings were available through December 15, 2012, with a maturity date of December 15, 2022. At March 31, 2013, OTH had $125.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Loan Agreement at a fixed interest rate of 4.55% per annum.
Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Cash provided by (used in): | | | |
Operating activities | $ | 15,440 |
| | $ | 10,700 |
|
Investing activities | (9,301 | ) | | (8,690 | ) |
Financing activities | 1,708 |
| | (14,474 | ) |
Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $4.7 million, or 44.3%, to $15.4 million from $10.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in storage service fee revenues and throughput fee revenues, partially offset by a decrease in ancillary service fee revenues and increased SG&A expenses.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $0.6 million, or 7.0%, to $9.3 million from $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in fixed asset purchases of $30.3 million, partially offset by an increase of $13.7 million in the collections of notes receivable from Oiltanking Finance B.V. and an increase of $16.0 million in the issuance of notes receivable from Oiltanking Finance B.V.
Cash paid for capital expenditures were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| | | |
Maintenance capital expenditures | $ | 735 |
| | $ | 755 |
|
Expansion expenditures | 36,566 |
| | 6,235 |
|
Total capital expenditures | $ | 37,301 |
| | $ | 6,990 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures are those capital expenditures required to maintain our long-term operating capacity. Expansion capital expenditures are those capital expenditures that we expect will increase our operating capacity over the long-term. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we spent $36.6 million of expansion capital primarily for the continuing construction of the new storage capacity at our Houston area terminals and associated crude oil pipeline infrastructure investments. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we spent $6.2 million of expansion capital primarily for the continuing construction of the new storage capacity at our Houston terminal and associated crude oil pipeline infrastructure investments.
In 2013, we expect to spend approximately $135.0 million to $145.0 million for capital expenditures, of which approximately $8.0 million is expected to relate to maintenance capital expenditures. A majority of the expansion project spending projected for 2013 relates to the crude oil pipelines and storage capacity projects at our Houston area terminals (see “—Recent Developments” above).
We anticipate the above mentioned capital expenditures will be funded primarily with cash on hand and long-term borrowings from Oiltanking Finance B.V.
We believe we have sufficient liquid assets, cash flow from operations and borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement to meet our financial commitments, debt service obligations and anticipated capital expenditures. We are, however, subject to business and operational risks that could adversely affect our cash flow. A material decrease in our cash flows would likely have an adverse effect on our borrowing capacity.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $16.2 million to $1.7 million from net cash flows used in financing activities of $14.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The following were the principal events impacting net cash flows provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2013:
| |
• | During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we borrowed $18.0 million under the Credit Agreement to finance expansion projects. |
| |
• | During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we paid $15.5 million of cash distributions to our limited partners and general partner while during the three months ended March 31, 2012, we paid $13.5 million of cash distributions to our limited partners and general partner. |
| |
• | During each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we repaid $0.8 million of notes payable to an affiliate. |
Other Considerations
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments Due by Period |
| Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years |
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 166,500 |
| | $ | 2,500 |
| | $ | 5,000 |
| | $ | 29,000 |
| | $ | 130,000 |
|
Interest payments (1) | 64,444 |
| | 7,875 |
| | 15,197 |
| | 14,127 |
| | 27,245 |
|
Purchase commitments (2) | 17,028 |
| | 17,028 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Capital expenditure obligations (3) | 19,286 |
| | 19,286 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 267,258 |
| | $ | 46,689 |
| | $ | 20,197 |
| | $ | 43,127 |
| | $ | 157,245 |
|
___________
| |
(1) | Interest payments include amounts due on our currently outstanding notes payable to an affiliate, Loan Agreement and Credit Facility, and commitment fees due on our Credit Facility. The interest amount calculated on the Credit Facility is based on the assumption that the amount outstanding and the interest rate charged both remain at their current levels. |
| |
(2) | We have short-term purchase obligations for products and services with third-party suppliers. Our estimated future payment obligations are based on the contractual price under each contract for products and services at March 31, 2013. |
| |
(3) | We have short-term payment obligations relating to capital projects we have initiated. These obligations represent unconditional payment obligations we have agreed to pay vendors for services rendered or products purchased and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2013. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Related Party Transactions
For more information regarding related party transactions, see Notes 2, 7 and 8 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Overview of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
A discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in our Annual Report. Certain of these accounting policies require the use of estimates. As more fully described therein, we consider the evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment and accruals for contingencies to be critical accounting policies and estimates. These estimates are based on our knowledge and understanding of current conditions and actions we may take in the future. Changes in these estimates will occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events. Subsequent changes in these estimates may have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. There have been no changes in our accounting policies during the first quarter of 2013.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. We do not take title to the crude oil, refined petroleum products and LPG that we handle and store, and therefore, we have no direct exposure to risks associated with fluctuating commodity prices.
In addition, our terminal services agreements with our storage customers are generally indexed to inflation and contain fuel surcharge provisions that are designed to substantially mitigate our exposure to increases in fuel prices and the cost of other supplies used in our business.
At March 31, 2013, we had $24.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement, bearing interest at variable rates. The weighted average interest rate incurred on the indebtedness as of March 31, 2013 was 2.18% per annum. A hypothetical 1% increase in the interest rate charged by Oiltanking Finance B.V. would have resulted in an estimated $0.1 million increase in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013. We may use certain derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to variable interest rates in the future, but we do not currently have in place any risk management contracts.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report at the reasonable assurance level.
Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) or in any other factors during our last completed fiscal quarter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of business, we may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings, some of which are covered in whole or in part by insurance. We may not be able to predict the timing or outcome of these or future claims and proceedings with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Currently, we are not party to any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the risks set forth in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors, of our Annual Report, which risks could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There has been no material change in our risk factors from those described in the Annual Report. These risks are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description |
| |
3.1 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Oiltanking Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-173199) filed on March 31, 2011). |
3.2 | First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Oiltanking Partners, L.P. dated July 19, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35230) filed on July 19, 2011). |
3.3 | Certificate of Formation of OTLP GP, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-173199) filed on March 31, 2011). |
3.4 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of OTLP GP, LLC, dated July 19, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35230) filed on July 19, 2011). |
*31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
*31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
**32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
**32.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
**101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
**101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
**101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
**101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
**101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
**101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
_____________
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | By: | OILTANKING PARTNERS, L.P. (Registrant) |
| | | |
| | By: | OTLP GP, LLC, as General Partner |
| | | |
Date: | May 8, 2013 | By: | /s/ Anne-Marie Ainsworth |
| | | Anne-Marie Ainsworth President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
Date: | May 8, 2013 | By: | /s/ Kenneth F. Owen |
| | | Kenneth F. Owen Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit Index
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description |
| |
3.1 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Oiltanking Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-173199) filed on March 31, 2011). |
3.2 | First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Oiltanking Partners, L.P. dated July 19, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35230) filed on July 19, 2011). |
3.3 | Certificate of Formation of OTLP GP, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-173199) filed on March 31, 2011). |
3.4 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of OTLP GP, LLC, dated July 19, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35230) filed on July 19, 2011). |
*31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
*31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
**32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
**32.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
**101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
**101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
**101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
**101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
**101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
**101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
_____________