MXL-2015.6.30-10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period From              to
Commission file number: 001-34666
MaxLinear, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 

Delaware
 
14-1896129
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
5966 La Place Court, Suite 100
Carlsbad, California
 
92008
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(760) 692-0711
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
¨
 
Accelerated filer
 
þ
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ
As of July 31, 2015, the registrant has 53,356,827 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001, and 6,882,879 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001, outstanding.


MAXLINEAR, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
Page
Part I
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Part II
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAXLINEAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par amounts)
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,731

 
$
20,696

Short-term investments, available-for-sale
16,638

 
48,399

Accounts receivable, net
41,561

 
18,523

Inventory
38,822

 
10,858

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
5,297

 
2,438

Total current assets
159,049

 
100,914

Property and equipment, net
23,123

 
12,441

Long-term investments, available-for-sale
8,706

 
10,256

Intangible assets, net
93,377

 
10,386

Goodwill
48,888

 
1,201

Other long-term assets
6,158

 
513

Total assets
$
339,301

 
$
135,711

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
20,784

 
$
7,509

Deferred revenue and deferred profit
4,135

 
3,612

Accrued price protection liability
15,779

 
10,018

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
24,681

 
5,548

Accrued compensation
8,857

 
6,559

Total current liabilities
74,236

 
33,246

Other long-term liabilities
10,723

 
3,363

Commitments and contingencies


 


Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 25,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
—

 
—

Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 550,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
—

 
—

Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000 shares authorized, 53,270 and 30,927 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
5

 
3

Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000 shares authorized, 6,883 and 6,984 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
1

 
1

Additional paid-in capital
368,507

 
177,912

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
88

 
(25
)
Accumulated deficit
(114,259
)
 
(78,789
)
Total stockholders’ equity
254,342

 
99,102

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
339,301

 
$
135,711

See accompanying notes.

3

MAXLINEAR, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net revenue
$
70,824

 
$
35,592

 
$
106,220

 
$
68,093

Cost of net revenue
43,882

 
13,346

 
57,607

 
25,794

Gross profit
26,942

 
22,246

 
48,613

 
42,299

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
23,993

 
13,892

 
39,274

 
26,987

Selling, general and administrative
23,620

 
8,688

 
34,564

 
16,449

Restructuring charges
11,389

 
—

 
11,389

 
—

Total operating expenses
59,002

 
22,580

 
85,227

 
43,436

Loss from operations
(32,060
)
 
(334
)
 
(36,614
)
 
(1,137
)
Interest income
51

 
60

 
121

 
121

Other expense, net
(22
)
 
(18
)
 
(56
)
 
(30
)
Loss before income taxes
(32,031
)
 
(292
)
 
(36,549
)
 
(1,046
)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
(1,384
)
 
320

 
(1,180
)
 
428

Net loss
$
(30,647
)
 
$
(612
)
 
$
(35,369
)
 
$
(1,474
)
Net loss per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
(0.58
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.78
)
 
$
(0.04
)
Diluted
$
(0.58
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.78
)
 
$
(0.04
)
Shares used to compute net loss per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
52,586

 
36,093

 
45,367

 
35,733

Diluted
52,586

 
36,093

 
45,367

 
35,733


See accompanying notes.

4

MAXLINEAR, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands)

 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net loss
$
(30,647
)
 
$
(612
)
 
$
(35,369
)
 
$
(1,474
)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax of $0 and $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively
(2
)
 
(3
)
 
33

 
(4
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $0 and $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively
68

 
1

 
80

 
—

Other comprehensive income (loss)
66

 
(2
)
 
113

 
(4
)
Total comprehensive loss
$
(30,581
)
 
$
(614
)
 
$
(35,256
)
 
$
(1,478
)

See accompanying notes.

5

MAXLINEAR, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
2015
 
2014
Operating Activities
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(35,369
)
 
$
(1,474
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Amortization and depreciation
13,866

 
2,205

Amortization of investment premiums, net
204

 
410

Amortization of inventory step-up
13,286

 
—

Stock-based compensation
10,020

 
7,078

Deferred income taxes
(1,960
)
 
11

Impairment of lease
5,593

 
—

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
6,176

 
(630
)
Inventory
(11,650
)
 
269

Prepaid and other assets
3,384

 
(342
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
302

 
1,152

Accrued compensation
1,503

 
2,209

Deferred revenue and deferred profit
523

 
(22
)
Accrued price protection liability
2,275

 
495

Other long-term liabilities
249

 
280

Net cash provided by operating activities
8,402

 
11,641

Investing Activities
 
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment
(1,460
)
 
(4,641
)
Cash used in acquisition, net of cash acquired
(3,615
)
 
—

Purchases of available-for-sale securities
(19,968
)
 
(29,764
)
Maturities of available-for-sale securities
53,108

 
28,995

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
28,065

 
(5,410
)
Financing Activities
 
 
 
Repurchases of common stock
(101
)
 
—

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
3,455

 
1,559

Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units
(3,161
)
 
(2,988
)
Equity issuance costs
(705
)
 
—

Net cash used in financing activities
(512
)
 
(1,429
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
80

 
(4
)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
36,035

 
4,798

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
20,696

 
26,450

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
56,731

 
$
31,248

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
 
 
 
Cash paid for income taxes
$
7

 
$
75

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:
 
 
 
Issuance of accrued share-based bonus plan
$
2,722

 
$
5,019

Accrued purchases of property and equipment
$
86

 
$
1,751

See accompanying notes.

6
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)


1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
MaxLinear, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware in September 2003. The Company is a provider of integrated, radio-frequency and mixed-signal integrated circuits for broadband communication and data center, metro, and long-haul transport network applications whose customers include module makers, original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and original design manufacturers, or ODMs, who incorporate the Company’s products in a wide range of electronic devices including cable and terrestrial and satellite set top boxes, DOCSIS data and voice gateways, hybrid analog and digital televisions, satellite low-noise blocker transponders or outdoor units and optical modules for data center, metro, and long-haul transport network applications. The Company is a fabless semiconductor company focusing its resources on the design, sales and marketing of its products.
Acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc.
On April 30, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc. (Entropic). Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement dated as of February 3, 2015, by and among the Company, Entropic, and two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, all of the Entropic outstanding shares were converted into the right to receive consideration consisting of cash and shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The Company paid an aggregate of $111.1 million and issued an aggregate of 20.4 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, to the stockholders of Entropic. In addition, the Company assumed all outstanding Entropic stock options and unvested restricted stock units that were held by continuing service providers (as defined in the merger agreement). The Company used Entropic’s cash and cash equivalents to fund a significant portion of the cash portion of the merger consideration and, to a lesser extent, its own cash and cash equivalents. The Company has made all of the material remaining disclosures required by ASC 805-10-50-2, Business Combinations. See Note 3.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Entropic and to address issues primarily relating to the integration of the Company and Entropic businesses, the Company terminated the employment of 73 Entropic employees during the second quarter of 2015. See Note 4.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MaxLinear, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and investments have been eliminated in consolidation.
The functional currency of certain foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of these foreign subsidiaries are translated at the current exchange rate at the balance sheet date and historical rates for equity. Revenue and expense components are translated at weighted average exchange rates in effect during the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translation are included as a component of stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the results of operations and, to date, have not been significant.
The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which include all normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2014 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on February 23, 2015, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on March 12, 2015.

7
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Use of Estimates
The preparation of unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is generated from sales of the Company’s integrated circuits. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: 1) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, 2) delivery of goods has occurred, 3) the sales price is fixed or determinable and 4) collectability is reasonably assured. Title to product transfers to customers either when it is shipped to or received by the customer, based on the terms of the specific agreement with the customer.
Revenue is recorded based on the facts at the time of sale. Transactions for which the Company cannot reliably estimate the amount that will ultimately be collected at the time the product has shipped and title has transferred to the customer are deferred until the amount that is probable of collection can be determined. Items that are considered when determining the amounts that will be ultimately collected are: a customer’s overall creditworthiness and payment history; customer rights to return unsold product; customer rights to price protection; customer payment terms conditioned on sale or use of product by the customer; or extended payment terms granted to a customer.
A portion of the Company’s revenues are generated from sales made through distributors under agreements allowing for pricing credits and/or stock rotation rights of return. Revenues from the Company’s distributors accounted for 11% and 14% of net revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. Revenues from the Company’s distributors accounted for 24% and 26% of net revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. Pricing credits to the Company’s distributors may result from its price protection and unit rebate provisions, among other factors. These pricing credits and/or stock rotation rights prevent the Company from being able to reliably estimate the final sales price of the inventory sold and the amount of inventory that could be returned pursuant to these agreements. As a result, for sales through distributors, the Company has determined that it does not meet all of the required revenue recognition criteria at the time it delivers its products to distributors as the final sales price is not fixed or determinable.
For these distributor transactions, revenue is not recognized until product is shipped to the end customer and the amount that will ultimately be collected is fixed or determinable. Upon shipment of product to these distributors, title to the inventory transfers to the distributor and the distributor is invoiced, generally with 30 day terms. On shipments to the Company’s distributors where revenue is not recognized, the Company records a trade receivable for the selling price as there is a legally enforceable right to payment, relieving the inventory for the carrying value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributor, and records the corresponding gross profit in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of deferred revenue and deferred profit, representing the difference between the receivable recorded and the cost of inventory shipped. Future pricing credits and/or stock rotation rights from the Company’s distributors may result in the realization of a different amount of profit included in the Company’s future consolidated statements of operations than the amount recorded as deferred profit in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company records reductions in revenue for estimated pricing adjustments related to price protection agreements with the Company’s end customers in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. Price protection pricing adjustments are recorded at the time of sale as a reduction to revenue and an increase in the Company’s accrued liabilities. The amount of these reductions is based on specific criteria included in the agreements and other factors known at the time. The Company accrues 100% of potential price protection adjustments at the time of sale and does not apply a breakage factor. The Company reverses the accrual for unclaimed price protection amounts as specific programs contractually end or when the Company believes unclaimed amounts are no longer subject to payment and will not be paid. See Note 6 for a summary of the Company's price protection activity.

8
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Business Combinations
The Company applies the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations, in the accounting for its acquisitions. It requires the Company to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, at the acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, its estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations.
Costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company or the Company's internal operations are accounted for as termination and exit costs pursuant to ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, and are accounted for separately from the business combination. A liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized and measured at its fair value in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the liability is incurred. When estimating the fair value of facility restructuring activities, assumptions are applied regarding estimated sub-lease payments to be received, which can differ materially from actual results. This may require the Company to revise its initial estimates which may materially affect the results of operations and financial position in the period the revision is made.
For a given acquisition, the Company may identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition date and may extend its review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information to assess whether the Company includes these contingencies as a part of the fair value estimates of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and, if so, to determine their estimated amounts.
If the Company cannot reasonably determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) by the end of the measurement period, which is generally the case given the nature of such matters, the Company will recognize an asset or a liability for such pre-acquisition contingency if: (i) it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Subsequent to the measurement period, changes in estimates of such contingencies will affect earnings and could have a material effect on results of operations and financial position.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. The Company reevaluates these items quarterly based upon facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date with any adjustments to the preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill if identified within the measurement period. Subsequent to the measurement period or final determination of the tax allowance’s or contingency’s estimated value, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances will affect the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations and could have a material impact on the results of operations and financial position.
Litigation and Settlement Costs
Legal costs are expensed as incurred. The Company is involved in disputes, litigation and other legal actions in the ordinary course of business. The Company continually evaluates uncertainties associated with litigation and records a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss contingency when both of the following conditions are met: (i) information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements and (ii) the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.

9
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the acquired net tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets represent purchased intangible assets including developed technology and in-process research and development, or IPR&D, and technologies acquired or licensed from other companies. Purchased intangible assets with definitive lives are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives. Technologies acquired or licensed from other companies are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of the terms of the agreement, or estimated useful life. The Company capitalizes IPR&D projects acquired as part of a business combination. On completion of each project, IPR&D assets are reclassified to developed technology and amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment using a two-step method. Step one is the identification of potential impairment. This involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit, which the Company has determined to be the entity itself, with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount, the goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The Company tests by reporting unit, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at October 31 or more frequently if it believes indicators of impairment exist.
During development, IPR&D is not subject to amortization and is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company reviews indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment as of October 31, the date of its annual goodwill impairment review or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of indefinite-lived intangible assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future discounted cash flows that asset is expected to generate. Once an IPR&D project is complete, it becomes a definite lived intangible asset and is evaluated for impairment both immediately prior to its change in classification and thereafter in accordance with the Company's policy for long-lived assets.
The Company regularly reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets, as well as the useful lives, to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist which warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. An impairment loss would be recognized when the sum of the expected future undiscounted net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Should impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over the asset’s fair value.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. This new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminate all industry-specific guidance. The new revenue recognition standard provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard on its financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the disclosures around going concern. The new standard provides guidance around management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to significantly impact its financial statements.


10
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

2. Net Loss Per Share
Net loss per share is computed as required by the accounting standard for earnings per share, or EPS. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted-average number of dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method. For purposes of this calculation, common stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is dilutive.
The Company has two classes of stock outstanding, Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The economic rights of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock, including rights in connection with dividends and payments upon a liquidation or merger are identical, and the Class A common stock and Class B common stock will be treated equally, identically and ratably, unless differential treatment is approved by the Class A common stock and Class B common stock, each voting separately as a class. The Company computes basic earnings per share by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, the Company divides net loss by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding and the potential number of shares of dilutive Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period.
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(30,647
)
 
$
(612
)
 
$
(35,369
)
 
$
(1,474
)
Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic
52,586

 
36,093

 
45,367

 
35,733

Dilutive common stock equivalents
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted
52,586

 
36,093

 
45,367

 
35,733

Net loss per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
(0.58
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.78
)
 
$
(0.04
)
Diluted
$
(0.58
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.78
)
 
$
(0.04
)
The Company excluded 4.3 million and 5.7 million common stock equivalents for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, and 3.2 million and 3.3 million common stock equivalents for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, resulting from outstanding equity awards for the calculation of diluted net loss per share due to their anti-dilutive nature.
3. Business Combination
Acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc.
On April 30, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc. ("Entropic"). Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement dated as of February 3, 2015, by and among the Company, Entropic, and two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company ("the Merger Agreement"), all of the Entropic outstanding shares were converted into the right to receive consideration consisting of cash and shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The Company paid an aggregate of $111.1 million and issued an aggregate of 20.4 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, to the stockholders of Entropic. In addition, the Company assumed all outstanding Entropic stock options and unvested restricted stock units that were held by continuing service providers (as defined in the Merger Agreement). The Company used Entropic’s cash and cash equivalents to fund a significant portion of the cash portion of the merger consideration and, to a lesser extent, its own cash and cash equivalents.

11
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

As a result of the acquisition, the Company expects to reduce costs through economies of scale. Entropic has been recognized for pioneering the MoCA® (Multimedia over Coax Alliance) home networking standard and inventing Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”) outdoor unit single-wire technology. Entropic has a rich history of innovation and deep expertise in RF, analog/mixed signal and digital signal processing technologies. Entropic’s silicon solutions have been broadly deployed across major cable, satellite, and fiber service providers. The Company expects the acquisition of Entropic to add significant scale to the Company's analog/mixed-signal business, expand the Company’s addressable market and enhance the strategic value of the Company’s offerings to broadband and access partners, OEM customers, and service providers.
The merger has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, with MaxLinear treated as the accounting acquirer. Under this method of accounting, the Company recorded the acquisition based on the fair value of the consideration given and the cash consideration paid. The Company allocated the acquisition consideration paid to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective preliminary fair values at the date of completion of the merger. Any excess of the value of consideration paid over the aggregate fair value of those net assets has been recorded as goodwill.
The total consideration for the Entropic acquisition of $289.4 million is comprised of the equity value of shares of the Company's common stock that were issued in the transaction of $173.8 million, the portion of outstanding equity awards deemed to have been earned as of April 30, 2015 of $4.5 million and cash of $111.1 million. The portion of outstanding equity awards deemed not to have been earned of $9.3 million as of April 30, 2015 will be expensed over the remaining future vesting period, including $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2015. Assumed equity awards consisted of 1.9 million of the Company's stock options and 1.3 million restricted stock units.
The Company capitalized $0.7 million of costs related to the registration and issuance of the 20.4 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock to Entropic’s stockholders upon completion of the merger. In addition, the Company registered an additional 3.2 million shares related to shares of the Company’s Class A common stock which may be issued pursuant to outstanding equity awards under the former Entropic Stock Plans.
The estimated fair value of the purchase price consideration consisted of the following:
Cash
$
111,125

Class A common stock issued
173,781

Equity awards assumed
4,485

Total purchase consideration
$
289,391

Pursuant to the Company's business combinations accounting policy, the Company estimated the preliminary fair values of net tangible and intangible assets acquired and the excess of the consideration transferred over the aggregate of such fair values was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary fair values of net tangible assets and intangible assets acquired were based upon preliminary valuations and the Company's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The primary areas that remain preliminary relate to the fair values of intangible assets acquired, certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired, certain legal matters, income and non-income based taxes and residual goodwill. The Company expects to continue to obtain information to assist in determining the fair values of the net assets acquired during the measurement period.

12
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
 
Fair Value
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
$
107,510

Accounts receivable
29,214

Inventory
29,600

Prepaid expenses
5,680

Property and equipment, net
18,662

Other long-term assets
2,671

Intangible assets
92,400

Accounts payable
(17,552
)
Accrued price protection liability
(3,486
)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
(10,434
)
Accrued compensation
(3,517
)
Deferred tax liability
(1,933
)
Other long-term liabilities
(7,111
)
Total identifiable net assets
241,704

Goodwill
47,687

Fair value of net assets acquired
$
289,391

In connection with the acquisition of Entropic, the Company has assumed liabilities related to Entropic product quality issues, warranty claims and contract obligations which are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the purchase price allocation above.
The fair value of inventories acquired included an acquisition accounting fair market value step-up of $14.6 million. In the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recognized $13.3 million as a component of cost of sales as the inventory acquired on April 30, 2015 was sold to the Company’s customers. Included in inventory as of June 30, 2015, was $1.3 million relating to the remaining fair value step-up associated with the Entropic acquisition.
The Company is subject to legal and regulatory requirements, including but not limited to those related to taxation in each of the jurisdictions in the countries in which it operates. The Company has conducted a preliminary assessment of liabilities arising from these tax matters in each of these jurisdictions, and has recognized provisional amounts in its initial accounting for the acquisition of Entropic for the identified liabilities. However, the Company is continuing its review of these matters as well as other legal and regulatory matters during the measurement period, and if new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date identifies adjustments to the liabilities initially recognized, as well as any additional liabilities that existed as the acquisition date, the acquisition accounting will be revised to reflect the resulting adjustments to the provisional tax amounts or other liabilities initially recognized.
Acquisition and integration-related costs of $5.3 million were included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Company's statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
The following table presents details of the preliminary identified intangible assets acquired through the acquisition of Entropic:
 
Estimated Useful Life (in years)
 
Fair Value
Developed technology
7.0
 
$
43,600

In-process research and development
n/a
 
18,200

Trademarks and trade names
7.0
 
1,700

Customer relationships
5.0
 
4,700

Backlog
0.7
 
24,200

Total intangible assets
 
 
$
92,400


13
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

The fair value of the $92.4 million of identified intangible assets acquired in connection with the Entropic acquisition was estimated using an income approach. Under the income approach, an intangible asset's fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership of the asset. Indications of value are developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of return. More specifically, the fair value of the developed technology, IPR&D and backlog assets was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method, or MPEEM. The MPEEM is an income approach to fair value measurement attributable to a specific intangible asset being valued from the asset grouping’s overall cash-flow stream. MPEEM isolates the expected future discounted cash-flow stream to its net present value. Significant factors considered in the calculation of the developed technology and IPR&D intangible assets were the risks inherent in the development process, including the likelihood of achieving technological success and market acceptance. Each project was analyzed to determine the unique technological innovations, the existence and reliance on core technology, the existence of any alternative future use or current technological feasibility and the complexity, cost, and time to complete the remaining development. Future cash flows for each project were estimated based on forecasted revenue and costs, taking into account the expected product life cycles, market penetration, and growth rates. Developed technology will begin amortization immediately and IPR&D will begin amortization upon the completion of each project. If any of the projects are abandoned, the Company will be required to impair the related IPR&D asset.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Entropic and to address issues primarily relating to the integration of the Company and Entropic businesses, the Company entered into a restructuring plan. See Note 4.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations for each of the periods presented, as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2014:
 
Six Months Ended June 30
 
2015
 
2014
Net revenues
$
177,590

 
$
173,948

Net loss
(7,984
)
 
(77,595
)
The following adjustments were included in the unaudited pro forma financial information:
 
Six Months Ended June 30
 
2015
 
2014
Amortization and depreciation of intangible assets and property, plant
and equipment acquired
$
(8,557
)
 
$
16,775

Amortization of inventory step-up
(13,286
)
 
14,244

Acquisition and integration expenses
(13,307
)
 
—

Restructuring charges
(11,389
)
 
—

 
$
(46,539
)
 
$
31,019

The pro forma data is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations of the combined business had the merger actually occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2014 or of the results of future operations of the combined business. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect any operating efficiencies and cost saving that may be realized from the integration of the acquisition.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, $32.3 million of revenue and $3.0 million of gross profit of former Entropic operations since the acquisition date are included in the Company's unaudited consolidated statements of operations.

14
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Acquisition of Physpeed, Co., Ltd.
On October 31, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Physpeed Co., Ltd. (“Physpeed”), a privately held developer of high-speed physical layer interconnect products addressing enterprise and telecommunications infrastructure market applications. The Company paid $9.3 million in cash in exchange for all outstanding shares of capital stock and equity of Physpeed. $1.1 million of the consideration payable to the former shareholders of Physpeed was placed into escrow pursuant to the terms of the definitive merger agreement. The escrow release date is twelve months following the closing date of October 31, 2014. In addition, the definitive merger agreement provided for potential consideration of $1.7 million of held back merger proceeds for the former principal shareholders of Physpeed which will be paid over a two year period contingent upon continued employment and potential earn-out consideration of up to $0.75 million to the former shareholders of Physpeed for the achievement of certain 2015 and 2016 revenue milestones. As of June 30, 2015, $0.6 million of held back merger proceeds have been paid. The Company had also entered into retention and performance-based agreements with Physpeed employees for up to $3.25 million to be paid in cash or shares of MaxLinear Class A common stock based on the achievement of certain 2015 and 2016 revenue milestones.
As a result of the acquisition, the Company expects to reduce costs through economies of scale. The acquisition of Physpeed significantly accelerates the Company's total addressable market expansion efforts into infrastructure for data center, as well as metro and long-haul telecommunications operators. Physpeed’s expertise in high-speed analog design, combined with the Company's proven low-power digital CMOS mixed signal-integration and DSP capabilities, is expected to bring to market solutions that will uniquely enable the data traffic growth generated from smartphones and tablets, and over-the-top, or OTT, streaming video, in addition to cloud computing and data analytics in hyper-scale data centers. The goodwill of $1.2 million arising from the acquisition consists largely of the synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the Company and Physpeed. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company accounted for the merger using the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Under this method of accounting, the Company recorded the acquisition based on the fair value of the consideration given and the cash consideration paid in the merger at the time of the merger. The Company allocated the purchase price to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the date of the completion of the merger. Any excess of the value of consideration paid over the aggregate fair value of those net assets has been recorded as goodwill.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Physpeed:
Cash
$
9,250

Contingent consideration
265

Fair value of total consideration transferred
$
9,515

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The Company completed the purchase price allocation for its acquisition of Physpeed as of December 31, 2014:
Financial assets
$
114

Accounts receivable
447

Prepaid expenses
28

Inventory
69

Fixed assets
56

Identifiable intangible assets
10,000

Financial liabilities
(65
)
Net deferred tax liability
(2,335
)
Total identifiable net assets
8,314

Goodwill
1,201

 
$
9,515

Acquisition-related costs of $0.3 million were included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Company's statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

15
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets of $10.0 million consists of developed technology of $2.7 million and IPR&D of $7.3 million. Both the developed technology and IPR&D are related to optical interconnect interface physical layers products and the estimated useful lives have been assessed to be seven years for the developed technology. Developed technology will be amortized immediately and IPR&D will begin amortization upon the completion of each project. If any of the projects are abandoned, the Company will be required to impair the related IPR&D asset. The fair value of the developed technology and IPR&D was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method, or MPEEM. The MPEEM is an income approach to fair value measurement attributable to a specific intangible asset being valued from the asset grouping’s overall cash-flow stream. MPEEM isolates the expected future discounted cash-flow stream to their net present value. Significant factors considered in the calculation were the risks inherent in the development process, including the likelihood of achieving technological success and market acceptance. Each project was analyzed to determine the unique technological innovations, the existence and reliance on core technology, the existence of any alternative future use or current technological feasibility and the complexity, cost, and time to complete the remaining development. Future cash flows for each project were estimated based on forecasted revenue and costs, taking into account the expected product life cycles, market penetration, and growth rates.
Compensation Arrangements
In connection with the acquisition of Physpeed, the Company has agreed to pay additional consideration in future periods. There was a holdback of the merger proceeds whereby the former principal shareholders of Physpeed will be paid a quarterly amount of $0.2 million beginning on January 31, 2015 and ending on October 31, 2016 for a total of $1.7 million. Certain employees of Physpeed will be paid a total of $0.1 million of which $0.07 million will be paid in 2015 and $0.05 million will be paid in 2016. These payments are accounted for as transactions separate from the business combination as the payments are contingent upon continued employment and will be recorded as post-combination compensation expense in the Company's financial statements during the service period. The Company also agreed to a working capital adjustment of $0.04 million that was settled by December 31, 2014.
Earn-Out
The contingent earn-out consideration has an estimated fair value of $0.3 million at the date of acquisition. The earn-out is payable up to $0.75 million to the former shareholders of Physpeed. The 2015 earn-out is based on $0.375 million multiplied by the 2015 revenue percentage as defined in the definitive merger agreement. The 2016 earn-out is based on $0.375 million multiplied by the 2016 revenue percentage as defined in the definitive merger agreement. Subsequent changes to the fair value will be recorded through earnings. The fair value of the earn-out was $0.1 million and $0.3 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The change in the fair value of the earn-out was primarily due to revisions to the Company's expectations of earn-out achievement.
RSU Awards
The Company will grant restricted stock units, or RSUs, under its equity incentive plan to Physpeed continuing employees if certain 2015 and 2016 revenue targets are met contingent upon continued employment. The total maximum amounts of these RSUs are $3.25 million. These participants will be eligible to receive $1.625 million of the RSUs in 2015 and $1.625 million in 2016.
The RSUs granted in 2015 will be based on the calculation of the 2015 maximum revenue RSU amount multiplied by the 2015 revenue percentage as defined in the definitive merger agreement. The 2015 maximum revenue RSU amount is 50% of the aggregate maximum RSU award value divided by the 2015 average company share price (the average closing sales prices of stock trading on the New York Stock exchange over five consecutive trading days ending on the trade date that is the third trading date prior to the 2015 determination date (no later than ten business days after filing the Form 10-K for the 2015 fiscal year)). Qualifying revenues are the net revenues recognized in the 2015 fiscal year directly attributable to sales of Physpeed products or the Company’s provision of non-recurring engineering services exclusively with respect to the Physpeed products in accordance with U.S. GAAP reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements.

16
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

The RSUs granted in 2016 will be based on the calculation of the 2016 maximum revenue RSU amount multiplied by the 2016 revenue percentage as defined in the definitive merger agreement. The 2016 maximum revenue RSU amount is 50% of the aggregate maximum RSU award value divided by the 2016 average company share price (the average closing sales prices of stock trading on the New York Stock exchange over five consecutive trading days ending on the trade date that is the third trading date prior to the 2016 determination date (no later than ten business days after filing the Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year). Qualifying revenues are the net revenues recognized in the 2016 fiscal year directly attributable to sales of Physpeed products or the Company’s provision of non-recurring engineering services exclusively with respect to the Physpeed products in accordance with U.S. GAAP reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements.
The Company will record compensation expense for the 2015 RSUs over a 14 month service period from October 31, 2014 through December 31, 2015. The Company will record compensation expense for the 2016 RSUs over a 26 month service period from October 31, 2014 through December 31, 2016. The Company has recorded an accrual for the stock-based compensation expense for the 2015 and 2016 RSUs of $0.5 million at June 30, 2015.

4. Restructuring Activity
In connection with the Company's acquisition of Entropic, the Company entered into a restructuring plan to address matters primarily relating to the integration of the Company and Entropic businesses. In connection with this plan, the Company terminated the employment of 73 Entropic employees during the second quarter of 2015. The Company recognized associated non-recurring employee separation charges of approximately $5.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 related to these terminations. Included in these employee separation charges is $1.5 million of stock compensation for accelerated stock options and RSUs vesting due to double trigger change of control agreements and other special agreements in effect with certain Entropic employees.
Additionally, in connection with the restructuring plan, the Company ceased use of the majority of Entropic's former headquarters. Accordingly, the Company recognized lease impairment charges of $1.1 million based on the adjustment to the net present value of the remaining lease obligation on the cease use date. The Company also recorded impairment charges of $4.5 million related to leasehold improvements on the unused premises.
The following table presents the activity related to the plan, which is included in restructuring charges in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations:
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Employee separation expenses
$
5,796

Lease related impairment
5,593

 
$
11,389

The following table presents a rollforward of our restructuring liability as of June 30, 2015, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the unaudited consolidated balance sheets:
 
Employee Separation Expenses
 
Lease Related Impairment
 
Total
Liability as of December 31, 2014
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Restructuring charges
5,796

 
5,593

 
11,389

Cash payments
(4,057
)
 
—

 
(4,057
)
Non-cash charges
(1,491
)
 
(4,457
)
 
(5,948
)
Liability as of June 30, 2015
$
248

 
$
1,136

 
$
1,384



17
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

5. Financial Instruments
The composition of financial instruments is as follows:
 
June 30, 2015
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
 
Fair
Value
Gains
 
Losses
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
5,421

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
5,421

Government debt securities
8,898

 
1

 
—

 
8,899

Corporate debt securities
16,461

 
—

 
(16
)
 
16,445

 
30,780

 
1

 
(16
)
 
30,765

Less amounts included in cash and cash equivalents
(5,421
)
 
—

 
—

 
(5,421
)
 
$
25,359

 
$
1

 
$
(16
)
 
$
25,344

 
Fair Value at June 30, 2015
Liabilities
 
Contingent Consideration
$
133

Total
$
133

 
December 31, 2014
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
 
Fair
Value
Gains
 
Losses
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
1,858

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1,858

Government debt securities
27,154

 
5

 
(8
)
 
27,151

Corporate debt securities
31,543

 
3

 
(42
)
 
31,504

 
60,555

 
8

 
(50
)
 
60,513

Less amounts included in cash and cash equivalents
(1,858
)
 
—

 
—

 
(1,858
)
 
$
58,697

 
$
8

 
$
(50
)
 
$
58,655

 
Fair Value at December 31, 2014
Liabilities
 
Contingent Consideration
$
265

Total
$
265

As of June 30, 2015, the Company held 14 government and corporate debt securities with an aggregate fair value of $23.3 million that were in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. The gross unrealized losses of $0.02 million at June 30, 2015 represent temporary impairments on government and corporate debt securities related to multiple issuers, and were primarily caused by fluctuations in U.S. interest rates. The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Impairment is evaluated considering numerous factors, and their relative significance varies depending on the situation. Factors considered include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; including changes in the financial condition of the security’s underlying collateral; any downgrades of the security by a rating agency; nonpayment of scheduled interest, or the reduction or elimination of dividends; as well as our intent and ability to hold the security in order to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value.
All of the Company’s long-term available-for-sale securities were due between 1 and 2 years as of June 30, 2015.

18
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are the amounts that would be received in an asset sale or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between unaffiliated market participants and are recorded using a hierarchal disclosure framework based upon the level of subjectivity of the inputs used in measuring assets and liabilities. The levels are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available.
The Company classifies its financial instruments within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy on the basis of valuations using quoted market prices or alternate pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs, respectively. The Company’s money market funds were valued based on quoted prices for the specific securities in an active market and were therefore classified as Level 1. The government and corporate debt securities have been valued on the basis of valuations provided by third-party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. The pricing services may use a consensus price which is a weighted average price based on multiple sources or mathematical calculations to determine the valuation for a security, and have been classified as Level 2. The Company reviews Level 2 inputs and fair value for reasonableness and the values may be further validated by comparison to independent pricing sources. In addition, the Company reviews third-party pricing provider models, key inputs and assumptions and understands the pricing processes at its third-party providers in determining the overall reasonableness of the fair value of its Level 2 financial instruments. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has not made any adjustments to the prices obtained from its third party pricing providers. The contingent liability is classified as Level 3 as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and is valued using an internal rate of return model. The assumptions used in preparing the internal rate of return model include estimates for future revenues related to Physpeed products and services and a discount factor of 0.71% to 0.36% and 0.54% to 0.33% at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The assumptions used in preparing the internal rate of return model include estimates for outcome if milestone goals are achieved, the probability of achieving each outcome and discount rates. Significant changes in any of the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of contingent consideration in isolation could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value. A change in estimated future revenues would be accompanied by a directionally similar change in fair value.
The following table presents a summary of the Company’s financial instruments that are measured on a recurring basis:
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2015
 
Balance at
June 30,
2015
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
5,421

 
$
5,421

 
$
—

 
$
—

Government debt securities
8,899

 
—

 
8,899

 
—

Corporate debt securities
16,445

 
—

 
16,445

 
—

 
$
30,765

 
$
5,421

 
$
25,344

 
$
—

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
133

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
133

 
$
133

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
133


19
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
 
Balance at
December 31,
2014
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
1,858

 
$
1,858

 
$
—

 
$
—

Government debt securities
27,151

 
—

 
27,151

 
—

Corporate debt securities
31,504

 
—

 
31,504

 
—

 
$
60,513

 
$
1,858

 
$
58,655

 
$
—

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
265

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
265

 
$
265

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
265

The following summarizes the activity in Level 3 financial instruments:
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Contingent Consideration (1)
 
Beginning balance
$
265

(Gain) loss recognized in earnings (2)
(132
)
Ending balance
$
133

Net gain (loss) for the period included in earnings attributable to contingent consideration held at the end of the period:
$
(132
)
(1) In connection with the acquisition of Physpeed, the Company recorded contingent consideration based upon the expected achievement of certain 2015 and 2016 revenue milestones. Changes to the fair value of contingent consideration due to changes in assumptions used in preparing the valuation model are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the statement of operations.
(2) Changes to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration were primarily due to revisions to the Company's expectations of earn-out achievement.
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 securities in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.
6. Balance Sheet Details
Cash and cash equivalents and investments consist of the following:
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,731

 
$
20,696

Short-term investments
16,638

 
48,399

Long-term investments
8,706

 
10,256

 
$
82,075

 
$
79,351

Inventory consists of the following:
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Work-in-process
$
21,778

 
$
4,169

Finished goods
17,044

 
6,689

 
$
38,822

 
$
10,858


20
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Property and equipment consist of the following:
 
Useful Life
(in Years)
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Furniture and fixtures
5
 
$
2,416

 
$
735

Machinery and equipment
3 -5
 
22,706

 
12,695

Masks and production equipment
2
 
8,672

 
8,672

Software
3
 
2,800

 
905

Leasehold improvements
4 -5
 
10,371

 
4,451

Construction in progress
N/A
 
97

 
276

 
 
 
47,062

 
27,734

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
 
(23,939
)
 
(15,293
)
 
 
 
$
23,123

 
$
12,441

Intangible assets, net consist of the following:
 
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
(in Years)
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Licensed technology
3
 
$
2,821

 
$
2,821

Developed technology
7
 
46,700

 
2,700

Trademarks and trade names
7
 
1,700

 
—

Customer relationships
5
 
4,700

 
—

Backlog
1
 
24,200

 
—

Less accumulated amortization
 
 
(11,844
)
 
(2,435
)
 
 
 
68,277

 
3,086

In-process research and development
 
 
25,100

 
7,300

 
 
 
$
93,377

 
$
10,386

The following table presents future amortization of the Company’s intangible assets at June 30, 2015:
 
Amortization
2015
$
20,499

2016
7,967

2017
7,854

2018
7,854

2019
7,854

Thereafter
16,249

Total
$
68,277

Deferred revenue and deferred profit consist of the following:
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Deferred revenue—rebates
$
23

 
$
21

Deferred revenue—distributor transactions
6,358

 
5,585

Deferred cost of net revenue—distributor transactions
(2,246
)
 
(1,994
)
 
$
4,135

 
$
3,612


21
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Accrued price protection liability consists of the following activity:
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
Beginning balance
$
10,018

 
$
15,017

Additional liability from acquisition
3,486

 
—

Charged as a reduction of revenue
14,781

 
6,677

Reversal of unclaimed rebates
(63
)
 
(242
)
Payments
(12,443
)
 
(7,072
)
Ending balance
$
15,779

 
$
14,380

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Accrued technology license payments
$
3,000

 
$
3,000

Accrued professional fees
1,976

 
422

Accrued product liability
3,606

 
—

Accrued restructuring
1,384

 
—

Accrued litigation costs
700

 
560

Accrued royalty
1,824

 
—

Deferred tax liability
3,762

 
—

Other
8,429

 
1,566

 
$
24,681

 
$
5,548


7. Stock-Based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase rights granted to employees. The Company calculates the fair value of restricted stock units, or RSUs, and restricted stock awards, or RSAs, based on the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the grant date. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of the RSUs and RSAs granted in the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $9.98. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of the RSUs and RSAs granted in the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $9.03. No stock options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015.
The fair values of stock options and employee stock purchase rights were estimated at their respective grant date using the following assumptions:
Stock Options
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2014
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share
$
4.03

Risk-free interest rate
1.70
%
Dividend yield
—
%
Expected life (years)
4.56

Volatility
51.00
%

22
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

Employee Stock Purchase Rights
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share
$
2.25

 
$
2.47

Risk-free interest rate
0.09
%
 
0.05
%
Dividend yield
—
%
 
—
%
Expected life (years)
0.50

 
0.50

Volatility
32.65
%
 
47.75
%
The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the United States Treasury’s rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the award being valued. The assumed dividend yield was based on the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The weighted-average expected life of options was calculated using the simplified method as prescribed by guidance provided by the SEC. This decision was based on the lack of historical data due to the Company’s limited number of stock option exercises under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, due to the Company’s limited historical data, the estimated volatility incorporates the historical volatility of comparable companies whose share prices are publicly available. Effective for the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company is no longer incorporating the historical volatility of comparable companies in determining estimated volatility.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation in the statements of operations as follows:
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Cost of net revenue
$
61

 
$
32

 
$
96

 
$
61

Research and development
3,053

 
2,384

 
5,393

 
4,578

Selling, general and administrative
1,680

 
1,269

 
3,024

 
2,439

 
$
4,794

 
$
3,685

 
$
8,513

 
$
7,078

In connection with the acquisition of Entropic, the Company assumed stock options and RSUs originally granted by Entropic. Stock-based compensation expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 included $2.4 million related to assumed Entropic stock options and RSUs.
In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company granted 1.1 million RSUs with a fair value of $11.2 million related to its annual equity compensation review program, which will be expensed over the next four years. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company granted 0.7 million RSUs with a fair value of $6.4 million and 0.4 million stock options with a fair value of $1.7 million related to its annual equity compensation review program, which are expensed over the next four years.
Employee Benefit Plans
At June 30, 2015, the Company had stock-based compensation awards outstanding under the following plans: the 2004 Stock Plan, the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as well as the following former Entropic plans: the RF Magic 2000 Incentive Stock Plan, the 2001 Stock Option Plan, the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2007 Non-Employee Director's Plan and the 2012 Inducement Award Plan. All current stock awards are issued under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
2010 Equity Incentive Plan
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights, performance-based stock awards, and other forms of equity compensation, or collectively, stock awards. The exercise price for an incentive or a non-statutory stock option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant. Options granted will generally vest over a four-year period and the term can be from seven to ten years.

23
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

On January 1, 2015, 1.5 million shares of Class A common stock were automatically added to the shares authorized for issuance under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to an “evergreen” provision contained in the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, is implemented through a series of offerings of purchase rights to eligible employees. Generally, all regular employees, including executive officers, employed by the Company may participate in the ESPP and may contribute up to 15% of their earnings for the purchase of the Company’s Class A common stock under the ESPP. Unless otherwise determined by the Company’s board of directors, Class A common stock will be purchased for accounts of employees participating in the ESPP at a price per share equal to the lower of (a) 85% of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Class A common stock on the first date of an offering or (b) 85% of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of purchase.
On January 1, 2015, 0.5 million shares of Class A common stock were automatically added to the shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP pursuant to an “evergreen” provision contained in the ESPP.
Executive Incentive Bonus Plan
In April 2012, the Company's compensation committee amended its Executive Incentive Bonus Plan to, among other things, permit the settlement of awards under the plan in the form of shares of its Class A common stock. In May 2013, the Company's compensation committee amended its Executive Incentive Bonus Plan to permit the settlement of awards under the plan in any combination of cash or shares of its Class A common stock. For the 2014 and 2013 performance period, actual awards under the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan were settled in Class A common stock issued under its 2010 Equity Incentive Plan with the number of shares issuable to plan participants determined based on the closing sales price of the Company's Class A common stock as determined in trading on the New York Stock Exchange on May 14, 2015 and May 9, 2014, respectively. Additionally, the Company settled all bonus awards for all other employees for the 2014 and 2013 performance period in shares of its Class A common stock. The Company issued 0.2 million shares of its Class A common stock for the 2014 performance period upon settlement of the bonus awards on May 14, 2015. The Company issued 0.6 million shares of its Class A common stock for the 2013 performance period upon settlement of the bonus awards on May 9, 2014.
Common Stock
At June 30, 2015, the Company had 500 million authorized shares of Class A common stock and 500 million authorized shares of Class B common stock. Holders of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock have identical voting rights, except that holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share with respect to transactions that would result in a change of control of the Company or that relate to the Company’s equity incentive plans. In addition, holders of Class B common stock have the exclusive right to elect two members of the Company’s Board of Directors, each referred to as a Class B Director. The shares of Class B common stock are not publicly traded. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of Class A common stock and in most instances automatically converts upon sale or other transfer.
8. Income Taxes
In order to determine the quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company used an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income and statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The income tax provision consists primarily of income taxes related to the Company's operations in foreign jurisdictions as well as accruals for tax contingencies. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter during which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rates from quarter to quarter.
As the Company does not believe that it is more-likely-than-not that it will realize a benefit from its U.S. net deferred tax assets, including its U.S. net operating losses, the Company continues to provide a full valuation allowance against those assets and therefore does not incur significant U.S. income tax expense or benefit. Additionally, the Company completed the acquisition of Entropic Communications in the second quarter. As a result of the acquisition, there was a valuation allowance release resulting in a tax benefit of $1.9 million due to the purchase accounting adjustment for the net deferred tax liability Furthermore, the Company does not incur expense or benefit in certain tax free jurisdictions in which it operates.

24
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

The Company recorded a benefit from income taxes of $1.4 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 primarily relates to income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits increased by $2.0 million which includes an amount of $1.6 million related to the acquisition of Entropic. The Company does not anticipate its unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly over the next 12 months. Accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2015 were $0.05 million and $0.02 million, respectively.
The Federal examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the years 2010 and 2011 was completed during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Any impact from the audit was included in the 2013 financial statements. The Company is not currently under examination in any other jurisdictions.
9. Significant Customer and Geographic Information
Customers greater than 10% of net revenues for each of the periods presented are as follows:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Percentage of total net revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arris1
30
%
 
34
%
 
29
%
 
34
%
Cisco
16
%
 
11
%
 
15
%
 
*

                                        
* Represents less than 10% of the net revenue for the respective period.
1 Includes sales to Motorola Home, which was acquired by Arris in April 2013, for all periods presented.
Products shipped to international destinations representing greater than 10% of net revenue for each of the periods presented are as follows:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Percentage of total net revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
China
75
%
 
78
%
 
73
%
 
78
%
The determination of which country a particular sale is allocated to is based on the destination of the product shipment.
Balances greater than 10% of accounts receivable are as follows:
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31, 2014
Percentage of gross accounts receivable
 
 
 
Pegatron Corporation
41
%
 
41
%
Sernet Technologies Corporation
*

 
11
%
Sky UK Limited
11
%
 
*

                                        
* Represents less than 10% of the gross accounts receivable for the respective period end.

25
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

10. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations
At June 30, 2015, future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases, other obligations and inventory purchase obligations are as follows:
 
Operating Leases
 
Other Obligations
 
Inventory Purchase Obligations
2015 (remaining six months)
$
3,803

 
$
6,465

 
$
30,160

2016
7,430

 
11,362

 
—

2017
6,001

 
4,687

 
—

2018
5,056

 
700

 
—

2019
4,774

 
—

 
—

Thereafter
12,916

 
—

 
—

Total minimum payments:
$
39,980

 
$
23,214

 
$
30,160

Entropic Communications Merger Litigation
The Delaware Actions
Beginning on February 9, 2015, eleven stockholder class action complaints (captioned Langholz v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10631-VCP (filed Feb. 9, 2015); Tomblin v. Entropic Communications, Inc., C.A. No. 10632-VCP (filed Feb. 9, 2015); Crill v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10640-VCP (filed Feb. 11, 2015); Wohl v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10644-VCP (filed Feb. 11, 2015); Parshall v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10652-VCP (filed Feb. 12, 2015); Saggar v. Padval, et al., C.A. No. 10661-VCP (filed Feb. 13, 2015); Iyer v. Tewksbury, et al., C.A. No. 10665-VCP (filed Feb. 13, 2015); Respler v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10669-VCP (filed Feb. 17, 2015); Gal v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10671-VCP (filed Feb. 17, 2015); Werbowsky v. Padval, et al., C.A. No. 10673-VCP (filed Feb. 18, 2015); and Agosti v. Entropic Communications, Inc., C.A. No. 10676-VCP (filed Feb. 18, 2015)) were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware on behalf of a putative class of Entropic Communications, Inc. stockholders. The complaints name Entropic, the board of directors of Entropic, MaxLinear, Excalibur Acquisition Corporation, and Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC as defendants. The complaints generally allege that, in connection with the proposed acquisition of Entropic by MaxLinear, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Entropic stockholders by, among other things, purportedly failing to take steps to maximize the value of Entropic to its stockholders and agreeing to allegedly preclusive deal protection devices in the merger agreement. The complaints further allege that Entropic, MaxLinear, and/or the merger subsidiaries aided and abetted the individual defendants in the alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The complaints seek, among other things, an order enjoining the defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, an order declaring the merger agreement unlawful and unenforceable, in the event that the proposed transaction is consummated, an order rescinding it and setting it aside or awarding rescissory damages to the class, imposition of a constructive trust, damages, and/or attorneys’ fees and costs.
On March 27, 2015, plaintiffs Ankur Saggar, Jon Werbowsky, and Angelo Agosti filed an amended class action complaint. Also on March 27, 2015, plaintiffs Martin Wohl and Jeffrey Park filed an amended class action complaint. On April 1, 2015, plaintiff Mark Respler filed an amended class action complaint.
On April 16, 2015, the Court entered an order consolidating the Delaware actions, captioned In re Entropic Communications, Inc. Consolidated Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 10631-VCP (the “Consolidated Action”). The April 16, 2015 order appointed plaintiffs Rama Iyer and Jon Werbowsky as Co-Lead Plaintiffs and designated the amended complaint filed by plaintiffs Ankur Saggar, Jon Werbowsky, and Angelo Agosti as the operative complaint (the “Amended Complaint”).
The Amended Complaint names as defendants Entropic, the board of directors of Entropic, the Company, Excalibur Acquisition Corporation, and Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC. The Amended Complaint generally alleges that, in connection with the proposed acquisition of Entropic by the Company, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Entropic stockholders by, among other things, purportedly failing to maximize the value of Entropic to its stockholders, engaging in a purportedly unfair and conflicted sale process, agreeing to allegedly preclusive deal protection devices in the merger agreement, and allegedly misrepresenting and/or failing to disclose all material information in connection with the proposed transaction. The Amended Complaint further alleges that the Company and the merger subsidiaries aided and abetted the individual

26
MAXLINEAR, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts and percentage data)

defendants in the alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The Amended Complaint seeks, among other things: an order declaring the merger agreement unlawful and unenforceable, an order rescinding, to the extent already implemented, the merger agreement, an order enjoining defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, imposition of a constructive trust, and attorneys’ and experts’ fees and costs.
On April 24, 2015, the parties to the Consolidated Action entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding a proposed settlement of the Delaware actions. The proposed settlement is subject to negotiation of the settlement papers by the parties and is subject to court approval after notice and an opportunity to object is provided to the proposed settlement class. There can be no assurance that the parties will reach agreement regarding the final terms of the settlement agreement or that the Court of Chancery will approve the settlement.
CrestaTech Litigation
On January 21, 2014, CrestaTech Technology Corporation, or CrestaTech, filed a complaint for patent infringement against the Company in the United States District Court of Delaware (the “District Court Litigation”). In its complaint, CrestaTech alleges that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,075,585 (the “’585 Patent”) and 7,265,792. In addition to asking for compensatory damages, CrestaTech alleges willful infringement and seeks a permanent injunction. CrestaTech also names Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corp. and VIZIO, Inc. as defendants based upon their alleged use of the Company's television tuners. On January 28, 2014, CrestaTech filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission, or ITC, again naming the Company, Sharp, Sharp Electronics, and VIZIO (“the “ITC Investigation”). On May 16, 2014 the ITC granted CrestaTech’s motion to file an amended complaint adding six OEM Respondents, namely, SIO International, Inc., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Wistron Corp., Wistron Infocomm Technology (America) Corp., Top Victory Investments Ltd. and TPV International (USA), Inc. (collectively, with the Company, Sharp and VIZIO, the “Company Respondents”). CrestaTech’s ITC complaint alleges a violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1337 through the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of the Company’s accused products that CrestaTech alleges infringe the same two patents asserted in the Delaware action. Through its ITC complaint, CrestaTech seeks an exclusion order preventing entry into the United States of certain of the Company's television tuners and televisions containing such tuners from Sharp, Sharp Electronics, and VIZIO. CrestaTech also seeks a cease and desist order prohibiting the Company Respondents from engaging in the importation into, sale for importation into, the sale after importation of, or otherwise transferring within the United States certain of the Company's television tuners or televisions containing such tuners.
On December 1-5, 2014, the ITC held a trial in the ITC Investigation. On February 27, 2015, the Administrative Law Judge issued a written Initial Determination (“ID”), ruling that the Company Respondents do not violate Section 1337 in connection with CrestaTech’s asserted patents because CrestaTech failed to satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement pursuant to Section 1337(a)(2). In addition, the ID stated that certain of the Company’s television tuners and televisions incorporating those tuners manufactured and sold by certain customers infringe three claims of the ‘585 Patent, and these three claims were not determined to be invalid. On April 30, 2015, the ITC issued a notice indicating that it intended to review portions of the ID finding no violation of Section 1337, including the ID’s findings of infringement with respect to, and validity of, the ‘585 Patent, and the ID’s finding that CrestaTech failed to establish the existence of a domestic industry within the meaning of Section 1337. The Commission has requested additional briefing from the parties on certain issues under review, and the initial target date for completing the ITC investigation was June 29, 2015, which has since been revised to August 19, 2015. The District Court Litigation is currently stayed pending resolution of the ITC Investigation.
In addition, the Company has filed four petitions for inter partes review of the two asserted CrestaTech patents, including the three claims that the ID stated the Company infringed and that were not determined to be invalid. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has decided not to institute one IPR as being redundant to another IPR already underway for the same CrestaTech patent in front of the PTAB (not including the three claims mentioned above), and will likely decide whether to institute review proceedings on the remaining three in or about Q3 2015.
In view of the initial ruling in the ITC Investigation of no violation, the Company has not recorded an accrual for loss contingencies associated with the litigation; determined that an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible; or determined that the amount or range of any possible loss is reasonably estimable.

27

ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
The information in this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects and plans and objectives of management. The words “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “projects”, “will”, “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements that we make. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the risks set forth in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a provider of integrated, radio-frequency and mixed-signal integrated circuits for broadband communications and data center, metro, and long-haul transport network applications. Our high performance radio-frequency, or RF, receiver products capture and process digital and analog broadband signals to be decoded for various applications. These products include both RF receivers and RF receiver systems-on-chip (SoCs), which incorporate our highly integrated radio system architecture and the functionality necessary to receive and demodulate broadband signals, and physical medium devices that provide a constant current source, current-to-voltage regulation, and data alignment and retiming functionality in optical interconnect applications. Through our acquisition of Entropic Communications, we provide semiconductor solutions for the connected home, ranging from MoCA® (Multimedia over Coax Alliance) solutions that transform how traditional HDTV broadcast and Internet Protocol- (IP) based streaming video content is seamlessly, reliably, and securely delivered, processed, and distributed into and throughout the home, to digital set top box (STB) components and system solutions for the global satellite, terrestrial, cable and IP television (IPTV) markets. Our products enable the distribution and display of broadband video and data content in a wide range of electronic devices, including Pay-TV operator set top boxes and voice and data gateways, hybrid analog and digital televisions, Direct Broadcast Satellite outdoor units, and optical modules for data center, metro, and long-haul transport network applications.
Our net revenue has grown from approximately $0.6 million in fiscal 2006 to $133.1 million in fiscal 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, our net revenue was derived primarily from sales of RF receivers and RF receiver systems-on-chip ("SoCs"), and MoCA connectivity solutions into operator voice and data modems and gateways and global analog and digital RF receiver products for analog and digital television applications. These analog and digital television applications include Direct Broadcast Satellite outdoor unit ("DBS ODU") solutions which consist of our and translation switch ("BTS") and channel stacking switch ("CSS") products which simplify the installation required to support simultaneous reception of multiple channels from multiple satellites over a single cable. Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend, among other factors, on our ability to further penetrate existing markets; our ability to expand our target addressable markets by developing new and innovative products; and our ability to obtain design wins with device manufacturers, in particular manufacturers of set top boxes, data modems, and gateways for the broadband service provider and Pay-TV industries, manufacturers selling into the Cable infrastructure market, and manufacturers of optical module and telecommunications equipment.
Products shipped to Asia accounted for 90% and 90% of net revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, and 96% and 96% of net revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. A significant but declining portion of these sales in Asia is through distributors. Although a large percentage of our products is shipped to Asia, we believe that a significant number of the systems designed by these customers and incorporating our semiconductor products are then sold outside Asia. For example, we believe revenue generated from sales of our digital terrestrial set top box products during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 related principally to sales to Asian set top box manufacturers delivering products into Europe, Middle East, and Africa, or EMEA markets. Similarly, revenue generated from sales of our cable modem products during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 related principally to sales to Asian ODMs and contract manufacturers delivering products into European and North American markets. To date, all of our sales have been denominated in United States dollars.

28

A significant portion of our net revenue has historically been generated by a limited number of customers. In the three months ended June 30, 2015, two of our customers accounted for 45% of our net revenue, and our ten largest customers collectively accounted for 81% of our net revenue. In the six months ended June 30, 2015, two of our customers accounted for 44% of our net revenue, and our ten largest customers collectively accounted for 75% of our net revenue. In the three months ended June 30, 2014, one of our customers accounted for 34% of our net revenue, and our ten largest customers collectively accounted for 73% of our net revenue. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, one of our customers accounted for 34% of our net revenue, and our ten largest customers collectively accounted for 72% of our net revenue. For certain customers, we sell multiple products into disparate end user applications such as cable modems and cable set-top boxes.
Our business depends on winning competitive bid selection processes, known as design wins, to develop semiconductors for use in our customers’ products. These selection processes are typically lengthy, and as a result, our sales cycles will vary based on the specific market served, whether the design win is with an existing or a new customer and whether our product being designed in our customer’s device is a first generation or subsequent generation product. Our customers’ products can be complex and, if our engagement results in a design win, can require significant time to define, design and result in volume production. Because the sales cycle for our products is long, we can incur significant design and development expenditures in circumstances where we do not ultimately recognize any revenue. We do not have any long-term purchase commitments with any of our customers, all of whom purchase our products on a purchase order basis. Once one of our products is incorporated into a customer’s design, however, we believe that our product is likely to remain a component of the customer’s product for its life cycle because of the time and expense associated with redesigning the product or substituting an alternative chip. Product life cycles in our target markets will vary by application. For example, in the hybrid television market, a design-in can have a product life cycle of 9 to 18 months. In the terrestrial retail digital set top box market, a design-in can have a product life cycle of 18 to 24 months. In the cable operator modem and gateway sectors, a design-in can have a product life cycle of 24 to 48 months. In the satellite operator gateway and DBS outdoor unit sectors, a design-in can have a product life cycle of 24 months to 60 months and beyond.
Recent Developments
On April 30, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc., or Entropic. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement dated as of February 3, 2015 that we entered into with Entropic and two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, all of the Entropic outstanding shares were converted into the right to receive consideration consisting of cash and shares of our Class A common stock. We paid an aggregate of $111.1 million and issued an aggregate of 20.4 million shares of our Class A common stock, to the stockholders of Entropic. In addition, we assumed all outstanding Entropic stock options and unvested restricted stock units that were held by continuing service providers (as defined in the merger agreement). We used Entropic’s cash and cash equivalents to fund a significant portion of the cash portion of the merger consideration and, to a lesser extent, our own cash and cash equivalents. The integration and fair value of acquired Entropic assets and liabilities will impact our post-acquisition financial condition and results of operations.
Entropic is recognized for having pioneered the MoCA® (Multimedia over Coax Alliance) home networking standard and inventing Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”) outdoor unit single-wire technology. Entropic has a rich history of innovation and deep expertise in RF, analog/mixed signal and digital signal processing technologies. Entropic’s silicon solutions have been broadly deployed across major cable, satellite, and fiber service providers.
We believe our acquisition of Entropic will add significant scale to our analog/mixed-signal business, expanding our addressable market and enhancing the strategic value of our offerings to our broadband and access partners, OEM customers, and service providers.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles that are generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We continually evaluate our estimates and judgments, the most critical of which are those related to revenue recognition, business combinations, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, production masks, income taxes, stock-based compensation, goodwill and intangible assets and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known.

29

Business Combinations
The Company applies the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations, in the accounting for its acquisitions. It requires the Company to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, at the acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, its estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations.
Costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company or the Company's internal operations are accounted for as termination and exit costs pursuant to ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, and are accounted for separately from the business combination. A liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized and measured at its fair value in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the liability is incurred. When estimating the fair value of facility restructuring activities, assumptions are applied regarding estimated sub-lease payments to be received, which can differ materially from actual results. This may require the Company to revise its initial estimates which may materially affect the results of operations and financial position in the period the revision is made.
For a given acquisition, the Company may identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition date and may extend its review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information to assess whether the Company includes these contingencies as a part of the fair value estimates of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and, if so, to determine their estimated amounts.
If the Company cannot reasonably determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) by the end of the measurement period, which is generally the case given the nature of such matters, the Company will recognize an asset or a liability for such pre-acquisition contingency if: (i) it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Subsequent to the measurement period, changes in estimates of such contingencies will affect earnings and could have a material effect on results of operations and financial position.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. The Company reevaluates these items quarterly based upon facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date with any adjustments to the preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill if identified within the measurement period. Subsequent to the measurement period or final determination of the tax allowance’s or contingency’s estimated value, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances will affect the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations and could have a material impact on the results of operations and financial position.
There were no significant changes, other than the addition of business combinations, during the quarter ended June 30, 2015 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on March 12, 2015.
Results of Operations
The following describes the line items set forth in our consolidated statements of operations.
Net Revenue. Net revenue is generated from sales of integrated radio frequency analog and mixed signal semiconductor solutions for broadband communication applications. A significant but declining portion of our end customers purchase products indirectly from us through distributors. Although we actually sell the products to, and are paid by, the distributors, we refer to these end customers as our customers.
Cost of Net Revenue. Cost of net revenue includes the cost of finished silicon wafers processed by third-party foundries; costs associated with our outsourced packaging and assembly, test and shipping; costs of personnel, including stock-based compensation, and equipment associated with manufacturing support, logistics and quality assurance; amortization of certain production mask costs; cost of production load boards and sockets; and an allocated portion of our occupancy costs.

30

Research and Development. Research and development expense includes personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, new product engineering mask costs, prototype integrated circuit packaging and test costs, computer-aided design software license costs, intellectual property license costs, reference design development costs, development testing and evaluation costs, depreciation expense and allocated occupancy costs. Research and development activities include the design of new products, refinement of existing products and design of test methodologies to ensure compliance with required specifications. All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense includes personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, distributor and other third-party sales commissions, field application engineering support, travel costs, professional and consulting fees, legal fees, depreciation expense and allocated occupancy costs.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges consist of employee severance and stock compensation expenses, software license contract impairment charges and lease and leasehold impairment charges related to our restructuring plan entered into as a result of our acquisition of Entropic.
Interest Income. Interest income consists of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and investment balances.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) generally consists of income (expense) generated from non-operating transactions.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes. We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expenses for tax and financial statement purposes and the realizability of assets in future years.
Comparison of the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
The following table presents a comparison of each line item in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net revenue
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
Cost of net revenue
62

 
37

 
54

 
38

Gross profit
38

 
63

 
46

 
62

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
34

 
39

 
37

 
40

Selling, general and administrative
33

 
24

 
33

 
24

Restructuring charges
16

 
—

 
11

 
—

Total operating expenses
83

 
63

 
81

 
64

Loss from operations
(45
)
 
—

 
(35
)
 
(2
)
Interest income
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Other expense, net
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Loss before provision for income taxes
(45
)
 
—

 
(35
)
 
(2
)
Provision for income taxes
(2
)
 
1

 
(1
)
 
1

Net loss
(43
)%
 
(1
)%
 
(34
)%
 
(3
)%

31

Net Revenue
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
Operator
$
53,165

 
$
27,965

 
90
 %
 
$
82,033

 
$
53,097

 
54
 %
% of net revenue
75
%
 
79
%
 
 
 
77
%
 
78
%
 
 
Infrastructure and other
5,155

 
7,627

 
(32
)%
 
11,683

 
14,996

 
(22
)%
% of net revenue
7
%
 
21
%
 
 
 
11
%
 
22
%
 
 
Legacy video SoC
12,504

 
—

 
N/A

 
12,504

 
—

 
N/A

% of net revenue
18
%
 
—

 
 
 
12
%
 
—

 
 
Total net revenue
$
70,824

 
$
35,592

 
99
%
 
$
106,220

 
$
68,093

 
56
 %
The acquisition of Entropic Communications has changed the composition, breadth and diversity of MaxLinear’s technology portfolio. In particular, MoCA technologies have expanded MaxLinear’s platform in cable, satellite, and telecommunications applications, and analog channel stacking solutions have expanded MaxLinear’s presence in Direct Broadcast Satellite outdoor unit applications. In addition, the Company has increased its investment in new technology development targeting infrastructure markets, while reducing its investments into retail-oriented and legacy technologies such as terrestrial tuners, hybrid TV tuners, and legacy video processing technologies. As a result of these changes, MaxLinear has realigned its revenue composition with its strategic investment focus and platform presence. The Company has illustrated these changes with the market terms operator, infrastructure and other, and legacy video SoC.
Within the operator category, the primary contributors are MaxLinear’s broadband RF receivers, MoCA connectivity solutions, and analog and digital channel stacking satellite outdoor unit solutions. Within the infrastructure and other category, the primary revenue contributors are hybrid TV tuners and terrestrial set-top box TV tuners for DTA’s that are sold through retail channels, high-speed interconnect products for the data center, metro, and long haul markets, and access technologies for last mile high-speed data access and distribution solutions for multi-dwelling units. The legacy video SoC category includes video processing technologies used primarily in cable high definition digital-to-analog converters and other client IP devices; consistent with Entropic’s previously announced plans, MaxLinear intends to support existing product shipments in this market but does not plan to use its resources to expand the legacy SoC technology portfolio.
The increase in net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to $25.2 million of growth in operator applications, contributed primarily by analog channel-stacking ("aCSS") and MoCA products related to our Entropic acquisition, as well as organic growth across each of our other operator sub-categories. Growth of $12.5 million in our legacy video SoC products was attributable to our acquisition of Entropic. Declines in infrastructure and other revenues of $2.5 million were driven by hybrid-TV and consumer digital-to-analog terrestrial set-top box applications.
The increase in net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to $28.9 million of growth in operator applications, contributed primarily by analog channel-stacking and MoCA products related to our Entropic acquisition, as well as organic growth across each of our other operator sub-categories. Growth of $12.5 million in our legacy video SoC products was attributable to our acquisition of Entropic. Declines in terrestrial revenue of $3.3 million were driven by hybrid-TV and consumer digital-to-analog terrestrial set-top box applications.
Cost of Net Revenue and Gross Profit
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
Cost of net revenue
$
43,882

 
$
13,346

 
229
%
 
$
57,607

 
$
25,794

 
123
%
% of net revenue
62
%
 
37
%
 
 
 
54
%
 
38
%
 
 
Gross profit
26,942

 
22,246

 
21
%
 
48,613

 
42,299

 
15
%
% of net revenue
38
%
 
63
%
 
 
 
46
%
 
62
%
 
 

32

The decline in the gross profit percentage for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to revaluation of inventory amortization of $13.3 million and amortization of intellectual property costs of $1.0 million related to the Entropic acquisition. To a lesser extent, the decline in gross margin was also driven by the growth in Entropic-related products, which have historically generated lower gross margin than our previous corporate average.
The decline in the gross profit percentage for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to revaluation of inventory amortization of $13.3 million and amortization of intellectual property costs of $1.0 million related to the Entropic acquisition. To a lesser extent, the decline in gross margin was also driven by the growth in Entropic-related products, which have historically generated lower gross margin than our previous corporate average.
We currently expect that gross profit percentage will fluctuate in the future, from quarter-to-quarter, based on changes in product mix, average selling prices, and average manufacturing costs.
Research and Development
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
Research and development
$
23,993

 
$
13,892

 
73
%
 
$
39,274

 
$
26,987

 
46
%
% of net revenue
34
%
 
39
%
 
 
 
37
%
 
40
%
 
 
The increase in research and development expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to an increase in headcount-related items (including stock-based compensation) of $5.3 million and the combined increases in design tools, prototype, and occupancy expenses of $3.5 million.
The increase in research and development expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to an increase in headcount-related items (including stock-based compensation) of $6.0 million, combined increases in design tools, prototype, and occupancy expenses of $4.2 million, and severance expenses related to our exit of R&D related activities in Shanghai, China of $0.7 million.
We expect our research and development expenses to increase as we continue to focus on expanding our product portfolio and enhancing existing products.
Selling, General and Administrative
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
Selling, general and administrative
$
23,620

 
$
8,688

 
172
%
 
$
34,564

 
$
16,449

 
110
%
% of net revenue
33
%
 
24
%
 
 
 
33
%
 
24
%
 
 
The increase in selling, general and administrative expense in the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to transaction costs of $2.8 million and amortization of purchased intangible assets of $8.0 million associated with our Entropic acquisition, an increase in headcount-related items (including stock-based compensation) of $1.6 million and an increase in outside services and occupancy expenses of $0.9 million.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expense in the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014, was primarily due to transaction costs of $5.3 million and amortization of purchased intangible assets of $8.0 million associated with our Entropic acquisition, an increase in headcount-related items (including stock-based compensation) of $1.8 million and an increase in outside services and occupancy expenses of $0.9 million.
We expect selling, general and administrative expenses to increase in the future as we expand our sales and marketing organization to enable expansion into existing and new markets and continue to build our international administrative infrastructure.

33

Restructuring charges
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
2015
 
2014
 
% Change
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
Restructuring charges
$
11,389

 
$
—

 
N/A
 
$
11,389

 
$
—

 
N/A
% of net revenue
16
%
 
—
%
 
 
 
11
%
 
—
%
 
 
Restructuring charges in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 consist of employee severance and stock compensation expenses and lease and leasehold impairment charges related to our restructuring plan entered into as a result of our acquisition of Entropic.
Interest and Other Income (Expense)
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
(dollars in thousands)
Interest income
$
51

 
$
60

 
$
121

 
$
121

Other expense, net
(22
)
 
(18
)
 
(56
)
 
(30
)
Interest income decreased in the three months ended June 30, 2015 due to normal fluctuations in cash equivalent and investment balances and interest rates. Interest income remained steady in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Other expense, net in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 consisted primarily of losses on foreign currency transactions and investment management fees.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
(dollars in thousands)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
$
(1,384
)
 
$
320

 
$
(1,180
)
 
$
428

The benefit from income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $1.4 million or approximately 4.3% of pre-tax loss compared to a provision for income taxes of $0.3 million or approximately (109.6)% for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The benefit from income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $1.2 million or approximately 3.2% of pre-tax loss compared to a provision for income taxes of $0.4 million or approximately (40.9)% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. 
The benefit from income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 primarily relates to income tax in foreign jurisdictions as well as accruals for tax contingencies. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance to offset the federal and California deferred tax assets as realization of such assets does not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold required under accounting guidelines. We will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets by evaluating positive and negative evidence that may exist. Until such time that we remove the valuation allowance against our federal and California deferred tax assets, our provision for income taxes will primarily consist of taxes associated with our foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, the Company completed the acquisition of Entropic Communications in the second quarter of 2015. As a result of the acquisition, there was a valuation allowance release resulting in a tax benefit of $1.9 million due to the purchase accounting adjustment for the net deferred tax liability acquired. Furthermore, we do not incur expense or benefit in certain tax free jurisdictions in which we operate.
Income tax expense in the foreign jurisdictions in which we are subject to tax is expected to remain relatively constant due to the cost plus nature of these entities and the relatively consistent operating expenses in each jurisdiction. Fluctuations in world-wide income occur mostly outside of these jurisdictions and therefore have an insignificant effect on our provision for income taxes. We expect this relationship to continue until the time that we either recognize all or a portion of our federal and California deferred tax assets or implement changes to our global operations.

34

Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $56.7 million, short- and long-term investments of $25.3 million, and net accounts receivable of $41.6 million.
Following is a summary of our working capital and cash and cash equivalents and investments as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
June 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
 
(in thousands)
Working capital
$
84,813

 
$
67,668

Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,731

 
$
20,696

Short-term investments
16,638

 
48,399

Long-term investments
8,706

 
10,256

Total cash and cash equivalents and investments
$
82,075

 
$
79,351

We paid $111.1 million in cash to fund the cash portion of the consideration payable by us in connection with our acquisition of Entropic.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consisted of $41.0 million in non-cash operating expenses and $2.8 million in changes in operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by a net loss of $35.4 million. Non-cash items included in net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2015 included depreciation and amortization expense of $13.9 million, amortization of net investment premiums of $0.2 million, amortization of inventory step-up of 13.3 million, stock-based compensation of $10.0 million and impairment of lease of $5.6 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consisted of $9.7 million in non-cash operating expenses and $3.4 million in changes in operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by a net loss of $1.5 million. Non-cash items included in net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014 included depreciation and amortization expense of $2.2 million, amortization of net investment premiums of $0.4 million and stock-based compensation of $7.1 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $28.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Net cash provided by investing activities consisted of $53.1 million in maturities of securities, offset by $3.6 million cash used our acquisition of Entropic, $20.0 million in purchases of securities and $1.5 million in purchases of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities was $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Net cash used in investing activities consisted of $29.8 million in purchases of securities and $4.6 million in purchases of property and equipment, offset by $29.0 million in maturities of securities.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted primarily of $3.5 million in net proceeds from issuance of common stock, offset by $3.2 million in minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units, deferred issuance costs of $0.7 million and repurchases of common stock of $0.1 million. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted primarily of $1.6 million in net proceeds from issuance of common stock, offset by $3.0 million in minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units.
We believe that our $56.7 million of cash and cash equivalents and $25.3 million in short- and long-term investments at June 30, 2015 will be sufficient to fund our projected operating requirements for at least the next twelve months. Our cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2015 have been favorably affected by our implementation of an equity-based bonus program. In connection with that bonus program, in May 2015, we issued 0.2 million freely-tradable shares of our Class A common stock in settlement of bonus awards for the fiscal 2014 performance period under our bonus plan. In May 2014, we issued 0.6 million freely-tradable shares of our Class A common stock in settlement of bonus awards for the fiscal 2013 performance period under our bonus plan. We expect to implement a similar equity-based plan for fiscal 2015, but our compensation committee retains discretion to effect payment in cash, stock, or a combination of cash and stock.

35

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may need to raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness to continue to fund our operations in the future. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our engineering, sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of our expansion into new territories, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, the continuing market acceptance of our products and potential material investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, services or technologies. Additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may not be able to sustain our operations.
Warranties and Indemnifications
In connection with the sale of products in the ordinary course of business, we often make representations affirming, among other things, that our products do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, and agree to indemnify customers against third-party claims for such infringement. Further, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws require us to indemnify our officers and directors against any action that may arise out of their services in that capacity, and we have also entered into indemnification agreements with respect to all of our directors and certain controlling persons.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, or SPEs, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of June 30, 2015, we were not involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
Contractual Obligations
At June 30, 2015, future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases, other obligations and inventory purchase obligations are as follows:
 
Operating Leases
 
Other Obligations
 
Inventory Purchase Obligations
2015 (remaining six months)
$
3,803

 
$
6,465

 
$
30,160

2016
7,430

 
11,362

 
—

2017
6,001

 
4,687

 
—

2018
5,056

 
700

 
—

2019
4,774

 
—

 
—

Thereafter
12,916

 
—

 
—

Total minimum payments:
$
39,980

 
$
23,214

 
$
30,160



36

ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Risk
To date, our international customer and vendor agreements have been denominated almost exclusively in United States dollars. Accordingly, we have limited exposure to foreign currency exchange rates and do not enter into foreign currency hedging transactions. The functional currency of certain foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. Accordingly, the effects of exchange rate fluctuations on the net assets of these foreign subsidiaries’ operations are accounted for as translation gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity. We do not believe that a change of 10% in such foreign currency exchange rates would have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk
We had cash and cash equivalents of $56.7 million at June 30, 2015 which was held for working capital purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. We do not believe that we have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these investments as a result of changes in interest rates due to their short-term nature. Declines in interest rates, however, will reduce future investment income.
Investments Risk
Our investments, consisting of U.S. Treasury and agency obligations and corporate notes and bonds, are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and discounts to maturity. In the event that there are differences between fair value and cost in any of our available-for-sale securities, unrealized gains and losses on these investments are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Investments in fixed rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their market value adversely impacted due to rising interest rates. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates.

37

ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and no evaluation of controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, prior to filing this Quarterly Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
On April 30, 2015, we acquired Entropic and, as a result, we have begun integrating the processes, systems and controls relating to Entropic into our existing system of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with our integration plans. Except for the processes, systems and controls relating to the integration of Entropic, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the second quarter ended June 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


38

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Entropic Communications Merger Litigation
The Delaware Actions
Beginning on February 9, 2015, eleven stockholder class action complaints (captioned Langholz v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10631-VCP (filed Feb. 9, 2015); Tomblin v. Entropic Communications, Inc., C.A. No. 10632-VCP (filed Feb. 9, 2015); Crill v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10640-VCP (filed Feb. 11, 2015); Wohl v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10644-VCP (filed Feb. 11, 2015); Parshall v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10652-VCP (filed Feb. 12, 2015); Saggar v. Padval, et al., C.A. No. 10661-VCP (filed Feb. 13, 2015); Iyer v. Tewksbury, et al., C.A. No. 10665-VCP (filed Feb. 13, 2015); Respler v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10669-VCP (filed Feb. 17, 2015); Gal v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10671-VCP (filed Feb. 17, 2015); Werbowsky v. Padval, et al., C.A. No. 10673-VCP (filed Feb. 18, 2015); and Agosti v. Entropic Communications, Inc., C.A. No. 10676-VCP (filed Feb. 18, 2015)) were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware on behalf of a putative class of Entropic Communications, Inc. stockholders. The complaints name Entropic, the board of directors of Entropic, MaxLinear, Excalibur Acquisition Corporation, and Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC as defendants. The complaints generally allege that, in connection with the proposed acquisition of Entropic by MaxLinear, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Entropic stockholders by, among other things, purportedly failing to take steps to maximize the value of Entropic to its stockholders and agreeing to allegedly preclusive deal protection devices in the merger agreement. The complaints further allege that Entropic, MaxLinear, and/or the merger subsidiaries aided and abetted the individual defendants in the alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The complaints seek, among other things, an order enjoining the defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, an order declaring the merger agreement unlawful and unenforceable, in the event that the proposed transaction is consummated, an order rescinding it and setting it aside or awarding rescissory damages to the class, imposition of a constructive trust, damages, and/or attorneys’ fees and costs.
On March 27, 2015, plaintiffs Ankur Saggar, Jon Werbowsky, and Angelo Agosti filed an amended class action complaint. Also on March 27, 2015, plaintiffs Martin Wohl and Jeffrey Park filed an amended class action complaint. On April 1, 2015, plaintiff Mark Respler filed an amended class action complaint.
On April 16, 2015, the Court entered an order consolidating the Delaware actions, captioned In re Entropic Communications, Inc. Consolidated Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 10631-VCP (the “Consolidated Action”). The April 16, 2015 order appointed plaintiffs Rama Iyer and Jon Werbowsky as Co-Lead Plaintiffs and designated the amended complaint filed by plaintiffs Ankur Saggar, Jon Werbowsky, and Angelo Agosti as the operative complaint (the “Amended Complaint”).
The Amended Complaint names as defendants Entropic, the board of directors of Entropic, the Company, Excalibur Acquisition Corporation, and Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC. The Amended Complaint generally alleges that, in connection with the proposed acquisition of Entropic by the Company, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Entropic stockholders by, among other things, purportedly failing to maximize the value of Entropic to its stockholders, engaging in a purportedly unfair and conflicted sale process, agreeing to allegedly preclusive deal protection devices in the merger agreement, and allegedly misrepresenting and/or failing to disclose all material information in connection with the proposed transaction. The Amended Complaint further alleges that the Company and the merger subsidiaries aided and abetted the individual defendants in the alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The Amended Complaint seeks, among other things: an order declaring the merger agreement unlawful and unenforceable, an order rescinding, to the extent already implemented, the merger agreement, an order enjoining defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, imposition of a constructive trust, and attorneys’ and experts’ fees and costs.
On April 24, 2015, the parties to the Consolidated Action entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding a proposed settlement of the Delaware actions. The proposed settlement is subject to negotiation of the settlement papers by the parties and is subject to court approval after notice and an opportunity to object is provided to the proposed settlement class. There can be no assurance that the parties will reach agreement regarding the final terms of the settlement agreement or that the Court of Chancery will approve the settlement.

39

CrestaTech Litigation
On January 21, 2014, CrestaTech Technology Corporation, or CrestaTech, filed a complaint for patent infringement against us in the United States District Court of Delaware (the “District Court Litigation”). In its complaint, CrestaTech alleges that we infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,075,585 (the “’585 Patent”) and 7,265,792. In addition to asking for compensatory damages, CrestaTech alleges willful infringement and seeks a permanent injunction. CrestaTech also names Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corp. and VIZIO, Inc. as defendants based upon their alleged use of our television tuners. On January 28, 2014, CrestaTech filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission, or ITC, again naming us, Sharp, Sharp Electronics, and VIZIO (“the “ITC Investigation”). On May 16, 2014 the ITC granted CrestaTech’s motion to file an amended complaint adding six OEM Respondents, namely, SIO International, Inc., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Wistron Corp., Wistron Infocomm Technology (America) Corp., Top Victory Investments Ltd. and TPV International (USA), Inc. (collectively, with us, Sharp and VIZIO, the “Company Respondents”). CrestaTech’s ITC complaint alleges a violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1337 through the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of the Company’s accused products that CrestaTech alleges infringe the same two patents asserted in the Delaware action. Through its ITC complaint, CrestaTech seeks an exclusion order preventing entry into the United States of certain of our television tuners and televisions containing such tuners from Sharp, Sharp Electronics, and VIZIO. CrestaTech also seeks a cease and desist order prohibiting the Company Respondents from engaging in the importation into, sale for importation into, the sale after importation of, or otherwise transferring within the United States certain of the Company's television tuners or televisions containing such tuners.
On December 1-5, 2014, the ITC held a trial in the ITC Investigation. On February 27, 2015, the Administrative Law Judge issued a written Initial Determination (“ID”), ruling that the Company Respondents do not violate Section 1337 in connection with CrestaTech’s asserted patents because CrestaTech failed to satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement pursuant to Section 1337(a)(2). In addition, the ID stated that certain of the Company’s television tuners and televisions incorporating those tuners manufactured and sold by certain customers infringe three claims of the ‘585 Patent, and these three claims were not determined to be invalid. On April 30, 2015, the ITC issued a notice indicating that it intended to review portions of the ID finding no violation of Section 1337, including the ID’s findings of infringement with respect to, and validity of, the ‘585 Patent, and the ID’s finding that CrestaTech failed to establish the existence of a domestic industry within the meaning of Section 1337. The Commission has requested additional briefing from the parties on certain issues under review, and the target date for completing the ITC investigation was June 29, 2015, which has since been revised to August 19, 2015. The District Court Litigation is currently stayed pending resolution of the ITC Investigation.
In addition, the Company has filed four petitions for inter partes review of the two asserted CrestaTech patents, including the three claims that the ID stated the Company infringed and that were not determined to be invalid. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has decided not to institute one IPR as being redundant to another IPR already underway for the same CrestaTech patent in front of the PTAB (not including the three claims mentioned above), and will likely decide whether to institute review proceedings on the remaining three in or about Q3 2015.
In view of the initial ruling in the ITC Investigation of no violation, we have not recorded an accrual for loss contingencies associated with the litigation; determined that an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible; or determined that the amount or range of any possible loss is reasonably estimable.
Other Matters
In addition, from time to time, we are subject to threats of litigation or actual litigation in the ordinary course of business, some of which may be material. Other than the Entropic and CrestaTech litigation described above, we believe that there are no other currently pending matters that, if determined adversely to us, would have a material effect on our business or that would not be covered by our existing liability insurance maintained by us.

40

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Form 10-Q, including any information incorporated by reference herein, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, referred to as the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to as the Exchange Act. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include those listed below in this Item 1A and those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. We encourage investors to review these factors carefully. We may from time to time make additional written and oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the SEC. However, we do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of us.
Before you invest in our securities, you should be aware that our business faces numerous financial and market risks, including those described below, as well as general economic and business risks. The following discussion provides information concerning the material risks and uncertainties that we have identified and believe may adversely affect our business, our financial condition and our results of operations. Before you decide whether to invest in our securities, you should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties, together with all of the other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Annual Report on Form 10-K we filed on February 23, 2015, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on March 12, 2015, and in our other public filings.
On April 30, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc., or Entropic, and promptly following such acquisition, Entropic merged with and into Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC, with Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC continuing as the surviving entity and changing its name to Entropic Communications, LLC. For the risks relating to our acquisition of Entropic, please refer to the section of these risk factors captioned “Risks Relating to Our Recent Acquisition of Entropic.”
Risks Relating to Our Recent Acquisition of Entropic
Actual financial and operating results could differ materially from any expectations or guidance provided by us concerning future results, including (without limitation) expectations or guidance with respect to the financial impact of any cost savings and other potential synergies resulting from our acquisition of Entropic.
We currently expect to realize material cost savings and other synergies as a result of our acquisition of Entropic, and as a result, we currently believe that the acquisition will be accretive to our earnings per share, excluding upfront non-recurring charges, transaction related expenses, and the amortization of purchased intangible assets. The expectations and guidance we have provided with respect to the potential financial impact of the acquisition are subject to numerous assumptions, however, including assumptions derived from our diligence efforts concerning the status of and prospects for Entropic’s business, and assumptions relating to the near-term prospects for the semiconductor industry generally and the markets for Entropic’s products in particular. Additional assumptions we have made relate to numerous matters, including (without limitation) the following:
•
projections of Entropic’s future revenues;
•
the anticipated financial performance of Entropic’s products and products currently in development;
•
anticipated cost savings and other synergies associated with the acquisition, including potential revenue synergies;
•
the amount of goodwill and intangibles that will result from the acquisition;
•
certain other purchase accounting adjustments that we have recorded in our financial statements in connection with the acquisition;
•
acquisition costs, including restructuring charges and transactions costs payable to our financial, legal, and accounting advisors;
•
our ability to maintain, develop, and deepen relationships with customers of Entropic; and

41

We cannot provide any assurances with respect to the accuracy of our assumptions, including our assumptions with respect to future revenues or revenue growth rates, if any, of Entropic, and we cannot provide assurances with respect to our ability to realize the cost savings that we currently anticipate. Risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from currently anticipated results include, but are not limited to, risks relating to our ability to integrate Entropic successfully; currently unanticipated additional incremental costs that we may incur in connection with integrating the two companies; risks relating to our ability to continue to realize incremental revenues from the acquisition in the amounts that we currently anticipate; risks relating to the willingness of Entropic’s customers and other partners to continue to conduct business with MaxLinear; and numerous risks and uncertainties that affect the semiconductor industry generally and the markets for our products and those of Entropic specifically. Any failure to integrate Entropic successfully and to continue to realize the financial benefits we currently anticipate from the acquisition would have a material adverse impact on our future operating results and financial condition and could materially and adversely affect the trading price or trading volume of our Class A common stock.
Failure to integrate our business and operations successfully with those of Entropic in the expected time-frame or otherwise may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
We do not have a substantial history of acquiring other companies and have never pursued an acquisition of the size and complexity of Entropic. The success of the acquisition of Entropic will depend, in substantial part, on our ability to integrate Entropic’s business and operations successfully with those of MaxLinear and to realize fully the anticipated benefits and potential synergies from combining our companies, including, among others, cost savings from eliminating duplicative functions; operational efficiencies in our respective supply chains and in research and development investments; and revenue growth resulting from the addition of Entropic’s product portfolio. If we are unable to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits and potential synergies from the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. Any failure to timely realize these anticipated benefits would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We completed our acquisition of Entropic in April 2015 and have only begun the integration process. In connection with the integration process, we could experience the loss of key employees, loss of key customers, decreases in revenues and increases in operating costs, as well as the disruption of our ongoing businesses, any or all of which could limit our ability to achieve the anticipa