e6vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For
the month of July, 2006
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
(Translation of registrants name into English)
400 Godin Avenue, Quebec, Quebec, Canada G1M 2K2
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
On June 27, 2006, EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc., a Canadian corporation, reported its
results of operations for the third fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2006. This report on Form 6-K
sets forth the news release relating to EXFOs announcement and certain information relating to
EXFOs financial condition and results of operations for the third fiscal quarter of the 2006
fiscal year. This press release and information relating to EXFOs financial condition and results
of operations for the third fiscal quarter of the 2006 fiscal year are hereby incorporated as a
document by reference to Form F-3 (Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933)
declared effective as of July 30, 2001 and to Form F-3 (Registration Statement under the Securities
Act of 1933) declared effective as of March 11, 2002 and to amend certain material information as
set forth in these two Form F-3 documents.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO ELECTRO-OPTICAL ENGINEERING INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Germain Lamonde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Germain Lamonde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date:
July 5, 2006
EXFO Reports Significant Increases in Sales, Bookings and Earnings for Third Quarter
§ |
|
Sales increase 35.3% year-over-year and 17.8% sequentially to US$35.4 million |
|
§ |
|
Bookings reach US$37.9 million for a book-to-bill ratio of 1.07 |
|
§ |
|
GAAP net earnings amount to US$3.5 million compared to US$0.3 million at same period last year |
|
§ |
|
Gross margin improves to 56.4% |
QUEBEC CITY, CANADA, June 27, 2006EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc. (NASDAQ: EXFO;
TSX: EXF) reported today significant increases in sales, bookings and GAAP net earnings for the
third quarter ended May 31, 2006.
Sales increased 35.3% to US$35.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 from US$26.2 million
in the third quarter of 2005 and 17.8% from US$30.1 million in the second quarter of 2006. Net
bookings reached US$37.9 million for a book-to-bill ratio of 1.07 in the third quarter of fiscal
2006 compared to US$28.9 million in the same period last year and US$28.3 million in the second
quarter of 2006.
Gross margin improved to 56.4% of sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 to reach its highest
level in the last 15 quarters. In comparison, the company reported a gross margin of 56.2% in the
third quarter of 2005 and 55.3% in the second quarter of 2006.
GAAP net earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 totaled US$3.5 million, or US$0.05 per
diluted share, compared to net earnings of US$0.3 million, or US$0.00 per diluted share, in the
same period last year and net earnings of US$1.4 million, or US$0.02 per diluted share, in the
second quarter of 2006. GAAP net earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 included US$1.0
million in amortization of intangible assets, US$0.6 million in impairment of long-lived assets and
US$0.3 million in stock-based compensation costs. These charges were partially offset by a US$1.3
million revenue grant from the Quebec provincial government.
The third quarter of fiscal 2006 marked the first complete reporting period that Consultronics
Limited contributed to EXFOs consolidated financial results. The assets of Consultronics, a
leading supplier of IPTV, VoIP and xDSL test equipment for copper-based broadband access networks,
were integrated into EXFOs Telecom Division following the closing of the acquisition on Jan. 26,
2006.
Im pleased to report that our profitable growth strategy continues to unfold very nicely on the
strength of our eleventh consecutive quarter with increased sales and sixth consecutive quarter
with GAAP net earnings, said Germain Lamonde, EXFOs Chairman, President and CEO. We demonstrated
the leverage in our operating model by raising our gross margin to 56.4% in the third quarter and
increasing our GAAP operating margin to 10.2%, even though the Canadian dollar continued to
increase significantly during the quarter. The integration of Consultronics has been progressing
very efficiently and smoothly with this business contributing as expected to our overall results.
Protocol testing, which was once again above 10% of optical revenue, delivered its highest bookings
level in company history, while our optical test business received its third consecutive industry
award for achieving the largest organic market-share gains in 2005, largely due to its dominant
position in fiber-to-the-x testing. In a nutshell, I am satisfied with how EXFO is executing
overall.
Selected Financial Information
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2006 |
|
|
Q2 2006 |
|
|
Q3 2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Segmented results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
29,935 |
|
|
$ |
25,254 |
|
|
$ |
22,046 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
5,475 |
|
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,410 |
|
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
$ |
26,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,608 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other selected information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net earnings |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
Stock-based compensation costs |
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Grants revenue |
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Operating Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses amounted to US$11.1 million, or 31.3% of sales, in the third
quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to US$8.6 million, or 32.7% of sales, in the same period last year
and US$9.3 million, or 30.9% of sales, in the second quarter of 2006.
Gross research and development expenses reached US$5.3 million, or 15.1% of sales, in the third
quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to US$4.1 million, or 15.7% of sales, in the third quarter of 2005
and US$4.9 million, or 16.4% of sales, in the second quarter of 2006.
Net R&D expenses totaled US$4.1 million, or 11.6% of sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2006
compared to US$3.3 million, or 12.8% of sales, in the same period last year and US$3.9 million, or
13.0% of sales, in the second quarter of 2006.
Third-Quarter Business Highlights
|
|
Market expansionEXFO increased its sales 35.3%
year-over-year to US$35.4 million in the third quarter
of fiscal 2006 and 30.5% to US$92.5 million after three
quarters largely due to market-share gains in the
optical test business. Following the quarter-end, Frost
& Sullivan, a leading market research firm in the
telecommunications test and measurement industry, named
EXFO recipient of the Growth Strategy Leadership Award
for a third consecutive year. According to Frost &
Sullivan, EXFO was the only company to achieve
significant organic growth in the global fiber-optic
test equipment (FOTE) market in the past year, moving
from 10.3% in 2004 to 11.0% in 2005 for third place
overall. Based on the report, the company estimates that
it improved its leadership position in the portable
installation and maintenance test market segment from
22.2% in 2004 to 23.0% in 2005. |
§ |
|
ProfitabilityEXFO was profitable on a GAAP basis for a sixth consecutive quarter, reporting net
earnings of US$3.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. GAAP net earnings in the third
quarter of fiscal 2006 included US$1.0 million in amortization of intangible assets, US$0.6
million in impairment of long-lived assets and US$0.3 million in stock-based compensation costs.
These charges were partially offset by a US$1.3 million revenue grant. EXFO also reported US$3.6
million in earnings from operations in the third quarter, which amounted to a GAAP operating
margin of 10.2%. After nine months into fiscal 2006, the companys GAAP operating margin was
6.2%. |
|
§ |
|
InnovationEXFO launched five new products in the third quarter including amongst others
the next-generation CoLT-450P, a handheld IPTV and xDSL test solution for high-speed,
copper-based networks, and the PPM-352B-EG Passive Optical Network (PON) Power Meter optimized
for Ethernet PON and Gigabit PON architectures. Products that have been on the market two
years or less accounted for 40.7% of sales in the third quarter of 2006. Altogether, EXFO
launched 16 new test solutions in the first nine months of fiscal 2006, while 37.0% of sales
were derived from products that have been on the market two years or less. |
Business Outlook
Based on continued market-share gains and favorable market conditions, EXFO forecasts sales between
US$34.0 million and US$37.0 million and GAAP net earnings between US$0.02 and US$0.05 per diluted
share for the fourth quarter ending August 31, 2006. GAAP net earnings include US$0.02 per diluted
share in amortization of intangible assets and stock-based compensation costs.
Conference Call and Webcast
EXFO will host a conference call today at 5 p.m. (EDT) to review its financial results for the
third quarter of fiscal 2006. To listen to the conference call and participate in the question
period via telephone, dial 1-416-641-6452. Germain Lamonde, Chairman, President and CEO, and Pierre
Plamondon, CA, Vice-President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, will participate in the call.
An audio replay of the conference call will be available one hour after the event until 7 p.m. on
July 4, 2006. The replay number is 1-402-977-9141 and the reservation number is 21291872. The audio
Webcast of the conference call will also be available on EXFOs Website at www.EXFO.com, under the
Investors section.
About EXFO
EXFO is a recognized test and measurement expert in the global telecommunications industry. The
Telecom Division, which represents the majority of the companys business, offers a full suite of
test solutions and monitoring systems to network service providers, cable TV operators, telecom
system vendors and component manufacturers in approximately 70 countries. EXFO is the global market
leader for portable optical test solutions and a leading supplier of protocol and access test
solutions to enable triple-play deployments and converged IP networking. Its PC/Windows-based
modular FTB-200; FTB-400 and IQS-500 test platforms host a wide range of modular test solutions
across optical, physical, data and network layers, while maximizing technology reuse across several
market segments. The Life Sciences and Industrial Division, which leverages several core telecom
technologies, offers value-added solutions in the life sciences and high-precision assembly sectors
based on advanced spot-curing, fluorescence microscopy and nanopositioning solutions. For more
information about EXFO, visit www.EXFO.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and we intend that such forward-looking statements be
subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Forward-looking statements are statements other than
historical information or statements of current condition. Words such as may, will, expect,
believe, anticipate, intend, could, estimate, continue, or the negative or comparable terminology
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to
expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events and circumstances are
considered forward-looking statements. They are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking
statements due to various factors including consolidation in the global telecommunications test and
measurement industry; capital spending levels in the telecommunications, life sciences and
high-precision assembly sectors; concentration of sales; fluctuating exchange rates and our ability
to execute in these uncertain conditions; the effects of the additional actions we have taken in
response to such economic uncertainty (including workforce reductions, ability to quickly adapt
cost structures with anticipated levels of business, ability to manage inventory levels with market
demand); market acceptance of our new products and other upcoming products; limited visibility with
regards to customer orders and the timing of such orders; our ability to successfully integrate our
acquired and to-be-acquired businesses; the retention of key technical and management personnel;
and future economic, competitive and market conditions. Assumptions relating to the foregoing
involve judgments and risks, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which
are beyond our control. Other risk factors that may affect our future performance and operations
are detailed in our Annual Report on Form 20-F and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Canadian securities commissions. We believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information currently available
to us, but we cannot assure you that the expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly,
you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These statements speak
only as of the date of this document. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any of them to
reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this document.
30
For more information
Vance Oliver
Manager, Investor Relations
(418) 683-0913, Ext. 3733
vance.oliver@exfo.com
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
4,981 |
|
|
$ |
7,119 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
99,017 |
|
|
|
104,883 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $532
($352 as at August 31, 2005) |
|
|
21,560 |
|
|
|
13,945 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
Income taxes and tax credits recoverable |
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
Inventories (note 6) |
|
|
25,531 |
|
|
|
17,749 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,142 |
|
|
|
149,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes recoverable |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (note 4) |
|
|
17,571 |
|
|
|
13,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset held for sale (note 4) |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
11,800 |
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
27,278 |
|
|
|
20,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217,569 |
|
|
$ |
190,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 7) |
|
$ |
18,558 |
|
|
$ |
12,201 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,412 |
|
|
|
13,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government grants (note 5) |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,878 |
|
|
|
17,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
522,550 |
|
|
|
521,875 |
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
2,949 |
|
Deficit |
|
|
(376,621 |
) |
|
|
(381,846 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
44,188 |
|
|
|
30,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,691 |
|
|
|
173,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217,569 |
|
|
$ |
190,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
35,410 |
|
|
$ |
92,520 |
|
|
$ |
26,180 |
|
|
$ |
70,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (1,2) |
|
|
15,453 |
|
|
|
40,957 |
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
32,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
19,957 |
|
|
|
51,563 |
|
|
|
14,702 |
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative (1) |
|
|
11,080 |
|
|
|
29,441 |
|
|
|
8,569 |
|
|
|
23,710 |
|
Net research and development (1) (note 8) |
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
11,123 |
|
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
Amortization of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets (note 4) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government grants (note 5) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
16,349 |
|
|
|
45,864 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
39,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
5,699 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
1,966 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (note 9) |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
(2,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
(000s) |
|
|
68,676 |
|
|
|
68,613 |
|
|
|
68,552 |
|
|
|
68,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
outstanding (000s)
(note 11) |
|
|
69,543 |
|
|
|
69,252 |
|
|
|
68,969 |
|
|
|
68,977 |
|
|
(1) Stock-based compensation costs included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Net research and development |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) The cost of sales is exclusive
of amortization, shown separately. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Deficit
and Contributed Surplus
(in thousands of US dollars)
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Balance Beginning of period |
|
$ |
(381,846 |
) |
|
$ |
(380,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct (add) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
|
5,225 |
|
|
|
(2,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period |
|
$ |
(376,621 |
) |
|
$ |
(382,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Balance Beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (deduct) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation costs |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
Reclassification of stock-based
compensation costs to share
capital upon exercise of stock
options |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period |
|
$ |
3,574 |
|
|
$ |
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
(2,088 |
) |
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on short-term investments |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
263 |
|
Stock-based compensation costs |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
6,003 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
6,883 |
|
Unrealized losses on short-term
investments |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
Government grants |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
12,235 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in non-cash operating items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(5,085 |
) |
|
|
(4,158 |
) |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
Income taxes and tax credits |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(3,090 |
) |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
(3,315 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
286 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
8,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to short-term investments |
|
|
(227,589 |
) |
|
|
(638,634 |
) |
|
|
(200,308 |
) |
|
|
(488,955 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal and maturity of
short-term investments |
|
|
230,756 |
|
|
|
651,655 |
|
|
|
196,589 |
|
|
|
479,862 |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets |
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
Business combination (note 3) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(17,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
(7,226 |
) |
|
|
(4,122 |
) |
|
|
(10,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Share issue expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on
cash |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Beginning of period |
|
|
4,777 |
|
|
|
7,119 |
|
|
|
4,258 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash End of period |
|
$ |
4,981 |
|
|
$ |
4,981 |
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
1 |
|
Interim financial information |
|
|
|
The financial information as at May 31, 2006, and for the three- and nine-month periods ended
May 31, 2005 and 2006, is unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to
present fairly the results of these periods in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in Canada have been included. The adjustments made were of a normal and
recurring nature. Interim results may not necessarily be indicative of results anticipated for
the entire year. |
|
|
|
These interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in Canada and use the same accounting policies and methods used
in the preparation of the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements.
However, all disclosures required for annual financial statements have not been included in
these financial statements. Consequently, these interim consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements. |
|
2 |
|
New accounting standards and pronouncements |
|
|
|
In January 2005, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) issued four new
accounting standards in relation to financial instruments: Section 3855, Financial Instruments
Recognition and Measurement; Section 3865, Hedges; Section 1530, Comprehensive Income;
and Section 3251, Equity. |
|
|
|
Section 3855 expands on Section 3860, Financial Instruments Disclosure and Presentation, by
prescribing when a financial instrument is to be recognized on the balance sheet and at what
amount. It also specifies how financial instrument gains and losses are to be presented in the
financial statements. |
|
|
|
Section 3865 provides an alternative to Section 3855 for entities that choose to designate
qualifying transactions as hedges for accounting purposes. It replaces and expands on Accounting
Guideline 13, Hedging Relationships, and on the hedging guidance in Section 1650, Foreign
Currency Translation, by specifying how hedge accounting is applied and what disclosures it
requires. |
|
|
|
Section 1530, Comprehensive Income, introduces a new requirement to temporarily present
certain gains and losses outside net income. |
|
|
|
Consequently, Section 3250, Surplus, has been revised as Section 3251, Equity. |
|
|
|
Sections 1530, 3251, 3855 and 3865 apply to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006.
The company will adopt these new standards on September 1, 2007. While the company is currently
assessing the effects of these new standards, impacts consistent with the adjustments described
under note 21 item b) of the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements are
expected. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
3 |
|
Business combination |
|
|
|
On January 26, 2006, the company acquired substantially all the assets of Consultronics Limited.
Based in Toronto, Canada, and with operations in the United Kingdom and Hungary, Consultronics
was a privately held company specializing in x-Digital Subscriber Line (xDSL), Internet Protocol
TV and Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) test solutions for broadband access networks. |
|
|
|
This acquisition was settled for a total cash consideration valued at $19,093,000 or $18,838,000
net of $255,000 of cash acquired. The total consideration includes severance expenses of
$660,000 for the termination of employees of the acquired business as well as other
acquisition-related costs of $822,000; it also includes the payment of a long-term debt of
$688,000. As at May 31, 2006, the company had paid $17,716,000 of the total consideration and
the remainder $1,122,000, or $1,157,000 translated at the quarter-end exchange rate was
included in the accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the balance sheet (note 7). |
|
|
|
This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and, consequently, the results of
operations of the acquired business have been included in the consolidated statements of
earnings of the company since January 26, 2006, being the date of acquisition. |
|
|
|
During the three months ended May 31, 2006, the company finalized the purchase price allocation
based on the audit of the acquired business financial statements. Overall, adjustments reduced
the gross purchase price by $196,000 and mainly related to acquired working capital and
acquisition-related costs (goodwill). The purchase price, including acquisition-related costs,
was allocated based on the estimated fair value of net assets at the date of acquisition as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
5,135 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,115 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
8,709 |
|
Current liabilities assumed |
|
|
(2,826 |
) |
Capital leases assumed |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net identifiable assets acquired |
|
|
13,731 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
18,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired core technology is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful
life of five years. |
|
|
|
This business, including acquired goodwill, reports to the Telecom Division. Acquired goodwill
is deductible for tax purposes. |
|
4 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
On June 23, 2006, the company entered into an agreement to sell its building designated as a
long-lived asset held for sale in the balance sheet, along with some equipment. Based on this
agreement, the company recorded an impairment charge of $604,000, representing the excess of
the carrying value of these assets over the net selling price. The charge was recorded as an
impairment of long-lived assets in the statements of earnings for the periods ended May 31,
2006. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
5 |
|
Government grants |
|
|
|
During 1998, the company entered into an agreement with the Quebec Minister of Industry,
Commerce, Science and Technology (The Minister). Pursuant to this agreement, the Minister
agreed to contribute, in the form of grants, up to CDN$2,200,000 (US$1,995,000) over the period
from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002, payable based on the number of full-time jobs
created during that period. |
|
|
|
The above grants were subject to the condition that jobs created pursuant to the agreement be
maintained for a period of at least five years from the date of creation. Since the beginning of
the program, the company deferred in the balance sheet CDN$1,450,000 (US$1,307,000) from the
amounts received until it received the final approval by the sponsor of the program. In June
2006, the sponsor of the program granted the company with its final approval and the company
recorded a non-recurring revenue of CDN$1,450,000 (US$1,307,000) in the earnings from operations
in the statement of earnings for the three months ended May 31, 2006. |
|
6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
13,201 |
|
|
$ |
9,373 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
10,083 |
|
|
|
7,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,531 |
|
|
$ |
17,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
$ |
5,781 |
|
Salaries and social benefits |
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Tax on capital |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Business combination (note 3) |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,558 |
|
|
$ |
12,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
|
|
Changes in the warranty provision are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Balance Beginning of period |
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
Provision |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
(415 |
) |
Addition from business combination |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Net research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Gross
research and
development
expenses |
|
$ |
5,339 |
|
|
$ |
14,285 |
|
|
$ |
4,113 |
|
|
$ |
11,732 |
|
Research and
development
tax credits
and grants |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
$ |
11,123 |
|
|
$ |
3,342 |
|
|
$ |
8,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
During the three- and nine-month periods ended May 31, 2005 and 2006, the company recorded
income taxes of $793,000, $2,215,000, $819,000 and $2,041,000, respectively. Most of these
income taxes represent income taxes payable at the Canadian federal level, which are reduced by
research and development tax credits that are recorded against gross research and development
expenses in the statements of earnings. |
|
|
|
The company records a full valuation allowance against its future income tax assets because it
is more likely than not that these assets will not be recovered. This caused its income tax rate
to be distorted in relation to its pre-tax accounting income. |
|
10 |
|
Contingency |
|
|
|
On November 27, 2001, a class action suit was filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York against the company, four of the underwriters of its Initial
Public Offering and some of its executive officers pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
|
|
Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and Sections 11, 12 and 16 of the Securities Act of 1933.
This class action alleges that the companys registration statement and prospectus filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2000, contained material misrepresentations
and/or omissions resulting from (i) the underwriters allegedly soliciting and receiving
additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which
they allocated material portions of the shares issued in connection with the companys Initial
Public Offering; and (ii) the underwriters allegedly entering into agreements with customers
whereby shares issued in connection with the companys Initial Public Offering would be
allocated to those customers in exchange for which customers agreed to purchase additional
amounts of shares in the after-market at pre-determined prices. |
|
|
|
On April 19, 2002, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint containing master allegations
against all of the underwriters in all of the 310 cases included in this class action and also
filed an amended complaint containing allegations specific to four of the companys
underwriters, the company and two of its executive officers. In addition to the allegations
mentioned above, the amended complaint alleges that the underwriters (i) used their analysts to
manipulate the stock market; and (ii) implemented schemes that allowed issuer insiders to sell
their shares rapidly after an initial public offering and benefit from high market prices. As
concerns the company and its two executive officers in particular, the amended complaint alleges
that (i) the companys registration statement was materially false and misleading because it
failed to disclose the additional commissions and compensation to be received by underwriters;
(ii) the two named executive officers learned of or recklessly disregarded the alleged
misconduct of the underwriters; (iii) the two named executive officers had motive and
opportunity to engage in alleged wrongful conduct due to personal holdings of the companys
stock and the fact that an alleged artificially inflated stock price could be used as currency
for acquisitions; and (iv) the two named executive officers, by virtue of their positions with
the company, controlled the company and the contents of the registration statement and had the
ability to prevent its issuance or cause it to be corrected. The plaintiffs in this suit seek an
unspecified amount for damages suffered. |
|
|
|
In July 2002, the issuers filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint and a
decision was rendered on February 19, 2003. Only one of the claims against the company was
dismissed. On October 8, 2002, the claims against its officers were dismissed pursuant to the
terms of Reservation of Rights and Tolling Agreements entered into with the plaintiffs. |
|
|
|
In June 2003, a committee of the companys Board of Directors conditionally approved a proposed
settlement between the issuer defendants, the individual defendants, and the plaintiffs. If
approved, the settlement would provide, among other things, a release of the company and of the
individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the amended
complaint. The company would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the settlement,
including agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims the company
may have against its underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is
expected to be borne by the companys insurance carriers. |
|
|
|
On June 25, 2004, the Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court
granted the preliminary approval motion on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications.
On August 31, 2005, the court issued a preliminary order further approving the modifications to
the settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The court also appointed the Notice
Administrator for the |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
|
|
settlement and ordered that notice of the settlement be distributed to all settlement class
members beginning on November 15, 2005. A settlement fairness hearing was held on April 24,
2006; however no ruling has been issued yet by the court. If the court determines that the
settlement is fair to the class members, the settlement will be approved. There can be no
assurance that this proposed settlement would be approved and implemented in its current form,
or at all. Therefore, it is not possible to predict the final outcome of the case, nor to
determine the amount of any possible losses. If the settlement process fails, the company will
continue to defend its position in this litigation that the claims against it, and its officers,
are without merit. Accordingly, no provision for this case has been made in the interim
consolidated financial statements as at May 31, 2006. |
|
11 |
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares
outstanding and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
Nine months |
|
Three months |
|
Nine months |
|
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
Basic
weighted
average
number of
shares
outstanding
(000s) |
|
|
68,676 |
|
|
|
68,613 |
|
|
|
68,552 |
|
|
|
68,514 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
stock options
(000s) |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
restricted
share units
(000s) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
deferred
share units
(000s) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
restricted
stock awards
(000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
weighted
average
number of
shares
outstanding
(000s) |
|
|
69,543 |
|
|
|
69,252 |
|
|
|
68,969 |
|
|
|
68,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards
excluded from
the
calculation
of diluted
weighted
average
number of
shares
because their
exercise
price was
greater than
the average
market price
of the common
shares
(000s) |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted loss per share for the nine months ended May 31, 2005, was the same as the
basic loss per share since the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted share units,
deferred share units and restricted stock awards should not be included in the calculation;
otherwise, the effect would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, the diluted loss per share for that
period was calculated using the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
12 |
|
Segment information |
|
|
|
The company is organized under two reportable segments: the Telecom Division and the Life
Sciences and Industrial Division. The Telecom Division offers integrated test solutions to
network service providers, cable operators, system vendors and component manufacturers
throughout the global telecommunications industry. The Life Sciences and Industrial Division
mainly leverages developed and acquired core telecom technologies for high-precision assembly
and research sectors. |
|
|
|
The following tables set out information per segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended May 31, 2006 |
|
|
Nine months ended May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
29,935 |
|
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
$ |
35,410 |
|
|
$ |
77,265 |
|
|
$ |
15,255 |
|
|
$ |
92,520 |
|
Earnings (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
$ |
3,608 |
|
|
$ |
5,404 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
5,699 |
|
Unallocated items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended May 31, 2005 |
|
|
Nine months ended May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
22,046 |
|
|
$ |
4,134 |
|
|
$ |
26,180 |
|
|
$ |
58,946 |
|
|
$ |
11,966 |
|
|
$ |
70,912 |
|
Earnings (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
Unallocated items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,966 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
|
|
Total assets per reportable segment are detailled as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
98,440 |
|
|
$ |
64,655 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
10,742 |
|
|
|
11,449 |
|
Unallocated assets |
|
|
108,387 |
|
|
|
114,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217,569 |
|
|
$ |
190,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated assets are comprised of cash, short-term investments and income taxes and tax
credits recoverable. |
|
13 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
On September 1, 2003, the company adopted the amendment made to the CICA Handbook section 3870,
Stock-Based Compensation and Other Stock-Based Payments. Accordingly, employee stock-based
compensations granted on or after September 1, 2003, were accounted for using a fair value-based
method. However, if the fair value-based method had been applied to employee stock-based
compensations granted prior to September 1, 2003, and outstanding as at May 31, 2005 and 2006,
the pro forma net earnings (loss) per share would have been the same as the net earnings (loss)
per share for all reporting periods. |
|
14 |
|
Differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
These interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP,
and significant differences in measurement and disclosure from U.S. GAAP and Regulation S-X of
the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States (SEC) are set out in note 21 to the
companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements. This note describes significant
changes occurring since the most recent annual consolidated financial statements and provides a
quantitative analysis of all significant differences. All disclosures required in annual
financial statements under U.S. GAAP and Regulation S-X of the SEC have not been provided in
these interim consolidated financial statements. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to conform to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period in accordance
with Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
(2,088 |
) |
Unrealized losses on
forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
(891 |
) |
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
securities |
a) |
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for
the period in accordance
with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
5,348 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(2,979 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment |
|
|
5,646 |
|
|
|
12,957 |
|
|
|
(2,431 |
) |
|
|
7,531 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on forward exchange
contracts |
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
293 |
|
Reclassification of
realized gains on
forward exchange
contracts in net
earnings |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(1,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
securities |
a) |
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,345 |
|
|
$ |
21,156 |
|
|
$ |
(3,494 |
) |
|
$ |
4,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share in
accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
(000s) |
|
|
68,676 |
|
|
|
68,613 |
|
|
|
68,552 |
|
|
|
68,514 |
|
Diluted weighted average
number of shares
outstanding (000s) |
|
|
69,543 |
|
|
|
69,252 |
|
|
|
68,969 |
|
|
|
68,977 |
|
Reconciliation of shareholders equity to conform to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
The following summary sets out the significant differences between the companys reported
shareholders equity under Canadian GAAP as compared to U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity in accordance with Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
193,691 |
|
|
$ |
173,400 |
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(11,949 |
) |
|
|
(11,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
187,653 |
|
|
$ |
165,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
The following table summarizes the shareholders equity activity under U.S. GAAP since
August 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Contributed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation |
|
|
Other |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
capital |
|
|
surplus |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
costs |
|
|
capital |
|
|
income |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Balance as at August
31, 2005 |
|
$ |
597,664 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(467,079 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,715 |
) |
|
$ |
5,094 |
|
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
|
$ |
165,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
Stock-based compensation
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
Unrealized gains on
forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at November 30,
2005 |
|
$ |
597,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(466,724 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,435 |
) |
|
$ |
5,062 |
|
|
$ |
33,504 |
|
|
$ |
169,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Stock-based compensation
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
Unrealized gains on
forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at February 28,
2006 |
|
$ |
597,820 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(465,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,173 |
) |
|
$ |
5,036 |
|
|
$ |
38,884 |
|
|
$ |
176,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,627 |
|
Stock-based compensation
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,646 |
|
|
|
5,646 |
|
Unrealized gains on
forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
|
Reclassification of
stock-based compensation
costs upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
598,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(461,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,652 |
) |
|
$ |
5,558 |
|
|
$ |
45,602 |
|
|
$ |
187,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period |
|
$ |
12,957 |
|
|
$ |
15,669 |
|
Cumulative effect of prior periods |
|
|
26,857 |
|
|
|
11,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,814 |
|
|
|
26,857 |
|
Unrealized gains on forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period |
|
|
2,974 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
Cumulative effect of prior periods |
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sales securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,602 |
|
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development tax credits
|
|
|
During the three- and nine-month periods ended May 31, 2005 and 2006, net research and
development expenses under Canadian GAAP included tax credits that are refundable against income
taxes payable of $481,000, $1,323,000, $595,000 and $1,788,000, respectively. Under U.S. GAAP,
these credits would have been recorded in the income taxes. This difference had no impact on the
net earnings (loss) and the net earnings (loss) per share figures for all reporting periods
under U.S. GAAP.
|
Statements of cash flows
|
|
|
For the three- and nine-months periods ended May 31, 2005 and 2006, there were no significant
differences between the statements of cash flows under Canadian GAAP as compared to U.S. GAAP,
except for the subtotal before change in non-cash operating items, whose presentation is not
permitted under U.S. GAAP.
|
Reconciliation item
|
a) |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
Under U.S. GAAP, short-term investments would be classified as available-for-sale
securities and changes in their fair-value would be reflected in other comprehensive income
(loss). Under Canadian GAAP, short-term investments are carried at the lower of cost and
market value and any unrealized gain or loss is reflected in the statement of earnings. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
New accounting standards and pronouncements
|
|
|
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The
amendments made by SFAS 151 improves financial reporting by clarifying that any abnormal amount
of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be
recognized as current-period charges and by requiring the allocation of fixed production
overheads to inventory, based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This SFAS is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The
company adopted this new statement on September 1, 2005, and its adoption had no impact on its
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payments. This statement supersedes
APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related implementation guidance, and
revises SFAS 123 in a number of areas. Under SFAS 123(R), all forms of share-based payment to
employees result in compensation costs recognized in the financial statements. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The company adopted this statement on
September 1, 2005, using the modified prospective application method of transition and its
adoption had no significant impact on its financial statements.
|
|
|
|
Under U.S. GAAP, until August 31, 2003, the company elected to measure compensation costs
related to the granting of stock options and stock awards using the intrinsic value method of
accounting. In this instance, however, under SFAS 123(R), the company is required to provide pro
forma disclosures of net earnings and net earnings per share for any periods included in the
financial statements that ended prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), as if the fair value-based
method of accounting had been applied to outstanding unvested awards granted prior to September
1, 2003. Consequently, if the fair value-based method had been applied to these awards, the pro
forma net earnings (loss) per share would have been the same as the net earnings (loss) per
share for all reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a replacement
of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a
change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting
principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual
instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. In general,
this statement requires a company to account for the adoption of a new accounting policy by
applying the new principle to prior accounting periods as if that principle had always been
adopted. This statement is effective for accounting changes or error corrections in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and we intend that such forward- looking
statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Forward-looking statements are
statements other than historical information or statements of current condition. Words such as
may, will, expect, believe, anticipate, intend, could, estimate, continue or the
negative or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of
future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. They are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements due to various factors, including consolidation in the global
telecommunications test and measurement industry; capital spending levels in the
telecommunications, life sciences and high-precision assembly sectors; concentration of sales;
fluctuating exchange rates and our ability to execute in these uncertain conditions; the effects of
the additional actions we have taken in response to such economic uncertainty (including workforce
reductions, ability to quickly adapt cost structures with anticipated levels of business, ability
to manage inventory levels with market demand); market acceptance of our new products and other
upcoming products; limited visibility with regards to customer orders and the timing of such
orders; our ability to successfully integrate our acquired and to-be-acquired businesses; the
retention of key technical and management personnel; and future economic, competitive and market
conditions. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments and risks, all of which are
difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Other risk
factors that may affect our future performance and operations are detailed in our Annual Report on
Form 20-F and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian
securities commission. We believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are reasonable based on information currently available to us, but we cannot assure you that the
expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as at the date of this document. We
undertake no obligation to revise or update any of them to reflect events or circumstances that
occur after the date of this document.
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
dated June 27, 2006.
All dollar amounts are expressed in US dollars, except as otherwise noted.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Leading telecom operators (telcos) in North America continued deploying fiber deeper in their
access networks amidst a triple-play battle (even quadruple-play with wireless telephony) that is
taking place between cable TV operators (cablecos) to offer consumers bundled voice, data and video
services. These fiber deployments, which will ultimately enable revenue expansion through
bandwidth-intensive service offerings, are expected to increase wireline capital expenditures in
calendar 2006 and beyond, especially in the United States.
Leading US telcos, along with a number of Tier-II and Tier-III players, have opted for an
assortment of broadband deployment strategies, including fiber-to-the-node (FTTN),
fiber-to-the-curb (FTTC), or fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP), depending on their estimates of how much
bandwidth will be required to meet the challenge from the cablecos. FTTP consists of fiber
1
deployed from the central office to a home or business, so bandwidth capacity is almost limitless.
FTTN and FTTC adopt a less costly model in which fiber is rolled out from the central office to a
node or curb, while copper extends approximately for the remaining 900 or 3000 feet, respectively,
to the premises. This hybrid infrastructure, however, limits bandwidth capacity: the longer the
copper plant, the less bandwidth delivered to the premises. These various deployments, which fall
under the generic FTTx name, are not as prevalent in Europe and Asia, with the exception of Japan
and Korea. FTTx deployments in these two countries, enabling transmission rates as high as 100
Mb/s, are actually further ahead than in the US. FTTx is gaining momentum among telcos in several
geographic regions as a means to increase revenues by delivering enhanced video services to
consumers.
Against this backdrop, there has been consolidation among telcos in the US during the past
year. Verizon acquired MCI, while SBC Communications merged with AT&T. The latter combination also
announced a merger with BellSouth. These transactions, which have reduced the number of telcos in
the industry, will likely increase competition among various suppliers. Similarly, large system
vendors like Alcatel and Lucent announced a merger in order to enhance their competitive position
and value proposition to the growing number of large telcos.
On a global basis, as the demand for broadband services increases, voice, data and video are
becoming mere applications on converged, IP-based networks. Telcos around the world are migrating
from public switched telephone networks (PSTN) to packet-based, IP networks in order to achieve
substantial reductions in operating expenses and increased profitability.
Legacy SONET/SDH networks were designed in the late 1970s to carry voice traffic. Their
efficiency, however, can often times drop to as low as 30% when combining voice, data and video
services. Next-generation networks represent a major technological improvement, since they can
deliver triple-play services at near 100% efficiency, regardless of the payload content, while
significantly reducing the cost of operating and maintaining networks.
These key market trends continued to affect multiple segments of the global telecommunications
supply chain in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. System vendors benefited from orders by both
telcos and cablecos for next-generation, converged IP networks as well as from major investments by
telcos in access networks. Component vendors saw increased demand for optical components that
support FTTx and IP-based systems. Some test and measurement equipment vendors attracted the
attention of telcos, cablecos, system manufacturers and component vendors, especially ones offering
test solutions for IP optical networking and/or FTTx applications.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We reported sales of $35.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, which represented an
increase of 35.3% year-over-year. It also marked our 11th consecutive reporting period with revenue
growth. After the first nine months of fiscal 2006, our sales grew 30.5% year-over-year compared to
our updated goal of 25% for the full fiscal year. In addition, in the third quarter of fiscal 2006,
we reduced sales concentration, with our top customer accounting for 19.4% of our total sales,
compared to 30.8% for the same period last year. Finally, it should be noted that the third quarter
of 2006 marked the first full reporting period that Consultronics Limited contributed to our
consolidated financial results. The assets of Consultronics, a leading supplier of IPTV, VoIP and
xDSL test equipment for copper-based broadband access networks, were integrated into our Telecom
Division following the closing of the acquisition on January 26, 2006.
2
Looking at the bottom line, we were profitable on a GAAP basis for a sixth consecutive quarter
with $3.5 million in net earnings, or $0.05 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2006
compared to break-even in the third quarter of 2005. Net earnings per share in the third quarter of
2006 included charges of $0.03 per diluted share for amortization of intangible assets, impairment
of long-lived assets and stock-based compensation costs. However, they included non-recurring grant
revenue of $0.02 per diluted share. In terms of our GAAP operating margin, it reached 10.2% in the
third quarter of 2006. After the first nine months of fiscal 2006, our operating margin was 6.2%
versus our stated goal of 5% for the full year. Also, operating activities used $2.3 million of
cash. The timing of our sales within the quarter is the main reason which explains the use of cash
in the third quarter.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we announced and subsequently completed the
acquisition of substantially all the assets of Consultronics Limited. Based in Toronto, Canada, and
with operations in Southampton, United Kingdom and Budapest, Hungary, Consultronics Limited is a
leading supplier of test equipment for copper-based broadband access networks ranking among the top
three vendors in handheld x-Digital Subscriber Line (xDSL) testing, with a global market share of
13.4%, according to an industry report from Frost & Sullivan. The company also boasts a rich
product portfolio for testing next-generation technologies, such as IPTV (Internet Protocol TV) and
VoIP (Voice-over-Internet Protocol), which are critical for network service providers in their
deployment of triple-play services (voice, data, video) over optical and copper links in access
networks. Other test solutions offered by Consultronics include network monitoring probes for VoIP
and legacy telephone networks, Gigabit Ethernet Analyzers for remote testing applications, as well
as protocol and physical characterization instruments for local copper loops (copper access
networks). This acquisition is a strategic initiative to position EXFO as a genuine one-stop shop
for broadband access and triple-play testing, since it greatly complements our market leadership in
the FTTx market.
This acquisition has been settled for a total cash consideration valued at $19.1 million, or
$18.8 million net of cash acquired. Total consideration included acquisition-related costs of $1.5
million and the assumption of a long-term debt of $0.7 million. The estimated fair value of
acquired intangible assets amounts to $8.7 million. These intangible assets, namely core
technology, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of five years.
Consultronics, which has been integrated into EXFOs Telecom Division, contributed about four month
to our consolidated financial results so far in fiscal 2006.
In terms of innovation, we launched five new products in the third quarter of 2006 including,
among others, the next-generation CoLT-450P, a handheld IPTV and xDSL test solution for high-speed,
copper-based networks, and the PPM-352B-EG Passive Optical Network (PON) Power Meter, optimized for
Ethernet PON and Gigabit PON architectures. Products that have been on the market two years or less
accounted for 40.7% of sales in the third quarter of 2006. Altogether, we launched 16 new test
solutions in the first nine months of 2006, while 37.0% of our sales were derived from products
that have been on the market two years or less. Our stated goal is 40% for this latter metric.
Following the quarter-end, Frost & Sullivan, a leading authority in the fiber-optic test and
measurement industry, released new market-share numbers for calendar 2005. According to the
industry report, EXFO was the only company to report significant organic growth in the global
fiber-optic test equipment (FOTE) market, moving from 10.3% in 2004 to 11.0% in 2005 for third
place overall in the FOTE market. Based on this report, we estimate that we improved our leadership
position in our core installation and maintenance test market segment from 22.2% in 2004 to 23.0%
in 2005.
3
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Deutsche Telecom AG selected us as sole-source
supplier for all their fiber deployment test applications including FTTx. Consequently, so far
this year, we shipped several orders to this Tier-I European customer.
Finally,
during the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we performed our annual
impairment test for goodwill and reviewed the carrying value of
certain acquired intangible assets for impairment. Based on our
impairment tests, we concluded that goodwill and these intangible
assets were not impaired.
OUR STRATEGY, KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND CAPABILITY TO DELIVER RESULTS
For a complete description of our strategy, the related key performance indicators (KPIs), as
established at the beginning of fiscal 2006, as well as our capability to deliver results, please
refer to the corresponding sections in our most recent Annual Report, filed with the securities
commissions.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, considering our strong sales and booking levels at
mid-point of fiscal 2006, as well as the expected impact of the acquisition of Consultronics on our
future sales, we raised our growth metric to 25% year-over-year. The former KPI was 15% sales
growth year-over-year. After the first nine months of fiscal 2006, our sales grew 30.5%
year-over-year. Also, despite the additional charge for the amortization of acquired intangible
assets of approximately $1.0 million following the acquisition of Consultronics, we maintained our
profitability metric to reach 5% of earnings from operations in fiscal 2006. After nine months in
fiscal 2006, earnings from operations reached 6.2% of sales.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2006, 37% of our sales originated from products that have
been on the market for two years or less, which is below our stated goal of 40% for fiscal 2006.
With the help of the 15 new products brought to the market place in fiscal 2005, the 16 new ones
launched so far in fiscal 2006 and the addition of Consultronics products, we hope to achieve our
goal of 40% for fiscal 2006.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
For a complete description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to
the corresponding section in our most recent Annual Report, filed with the securities commissions.
The following details the changes in critical accounting policies that will be adopted in fiscal
2007.
|
|
|
In January 2005, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants issued four new
accounting standards in relation to financial instruments: Section 3855, Financial
Instruments Recognition and Measurement, Section 3865, Hedges, Section 1530,
Comprehensive Income and Section 3251, Equity. These new standards apply to fiscal
years beginning on or after October 1, 2006, and we will adopt them on September 1,
2007. |
Please refer to note 2 to our interim consolidated financial statements for further
information about these new standards and their impact on our financial statements.
4
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations for the periods ended May 31, 2005 and 2006, should be read in conjunction with our
interim consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto. Our interim consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (Canadian GAAP) and significant differences in measurement and disclosure from the
United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) are set out in note 14 to our
interim consolidated financial statements. Our measurement currency is the Canadian dollar although
we report our financial statements in US dollars. The following table sets forth interim
consolidated statements of earnings data in thousands of US dollars, except per share data, and as
a percentage of sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended May 31, |
|
|
ended May 31, |
|
|
ended May 31, |
|
|
ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
35,410 |
|
|
$ |
26,180 |
|
|
$ |
92,520 |
|
|
$ |
70,912 |
|
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
15,453 |
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
40,957 |
|
|
|
32,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
19,957 |
|
|
|
14,702 |
|
|
|
51,563 |
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
11,080 |
|
|
|
8,569 |
|
|
|
29,441 |
|
|
|
23,710 |
|
Net research and development |
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
11,123 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
Amortization of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government grants |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
16,349 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
45,864 |
|
|
|
39,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
5,699 |
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
1,966 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
(2,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
29,935 |
|
|
$ |
22,046 |
|
|
$ |
77,265 |
|
|
$ |
58,946 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
5,475 |
|
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
|
15,255 |
|
|
|
11,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,410 |
|
|
$ |
26,180 |
|
|
$ |
92,520 |
|
|
$ |
70,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
5,404 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,608 |
|
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
$ |
5,699 |
|
|
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross research and development |
|
$ |
5,339 |
|
|
$ |
4,113 |
|
|
$ |
14,285 |
|
|
$ |
11,732 |
|
Net research and development |
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
$ |
3,342 |
|
|
$ |
11,123 |
|
|
$ |
8,903 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown separately. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
Three months |
|
Nine months |
|
Nine months |
|
|
ended May 31, |
|
ended May 31, |
|
ended May 31, |
|
ended May 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
Net research and development |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Amortization of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government grants |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
(2.9) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
|
84.5 |
% |
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
83.5 |
% |
|
|
83.1 |
% |
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.4) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross research and development |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
Net research and development |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
(1) The cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown separately.
6
SALES
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, our global sales increased 35.3% to $35.4 million
from $26.2 million for the same period last year, with an 85%-15% split in favor of our Telecom
Division. Newly acquired Consultronics had a full impact on our sales in the third quarter of
fiscal 2006.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, our global sales increased 30.5% to $92.5 million from
$70.9 million for the same period last year, with an 84%-16% split in favor of our Telecom
Division. Consultronics contributed about four months to our sales so far in fiscal 2006.
Overall, for the two divisions, net accepted orders increased 31.1% to $37.9 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 2006 from $28.9 million for the same period last year for a book-to-bill
ratio of 1.07 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. In the previous quarter, the net accepted orders
were $28.3 million. Our increase of 31.1% in net accepted orders in the third quarter of fiscal
2006, compared to the same period last year reflects the impact of the Consultronics acquisition,
an increased demand for our test solutions (especially in the Europe-Middle East-Africa (EMEA) and
Asia-Pacific (APAC) regions), market-share gains in the telecommunications and life sciences
markets as well as the improvement in the telecommunications market environment.
Telecom Division
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, sales of our Telecom Division increased 35.8% to
$29.9 million from $22.0 million for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, sales of our Telecom Division increased 31.1% to $77.3
million from $58.9 million for the same period last year.
For the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2006, we benefited from our
continued portfolio of new products and an increased demand for our test solutions in EMEA and
APAC, compared to 2005, as we are making actions to expand our customer base in these areas. In
addition, the positive spending environment, as well as the market share we believe we gained so
far in fiscal 2006 for our optical products, helped us increase our sales year-over-year. Also,
this was the first full quarter following the integration of Consultronics into EXFOs Telecom
Division, which had a positive impact on our consolidated sales during the third quarter of fiscal
2006. To date, Consultronics products contributed about four months to our consolidated sales. The
results of Consultronics have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings since the
closing of the acquisition on January 26, 2006. Finally, during the third quarter and during the
first nine months of fiscal 2006, our top customer accounted for 22.9% and 16.8% of our Telecom
sales, respectively, compared to 36.6% and 31.2% for the corresponding periods last year,
reflecting the diversification of our customer base. In fact, excluding sales to our top customer,
our sales to this Division would have increased 65% and 59% for the third quarter and for the first
nine months of fiscal 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods last year.
Over the last few quarters, our penetration of the protocol test market has been modest as we
refocused our efforts onto next-generation solutions, which are at the basis of the whole trend
toward IP convergence. During recent months, we reached a key milestone for our protocol product
development program with the availability of our legacy SONET/SDH test solutions up to 10 Gb/s for
our FTB-200 as well as our next-generation and legacy solutions for
7
our FTB-400 and IQS-500 platforms. These latest product launches, combined with our existing
offering for Ethernet testing (from 10 Mb/s up to 10 Gb/s), 1 Gb/s Fibre Channel and TCP/IP test
solutions, provide us with an extensive product portfolio to compete against the incumbent players
in protocol testing, especially in the network service provider (NSP) market segment, but also to a
lesser degree, with system vendors. Among many key differentiators, we believe EXFO now offers the
most complete and advances compact test solutions combining legacy and next-generation SONET/SDH
and Ethernet test modules for rates up to 10 Gb/s within the same portable platform (i.e., our
FTB-400 main frame and GP-404 module receptacle). Sales and bookings of our protocol products
increased to their highest historical levels in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. Based on these
data points, we continue to believe that we should witness an increase in protocol test revenues
and that our protocol test revenues should equal our optical test revenues on a medium- to
long-term basis.
Life Sciences and Industrial Division
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, sales of our Life Sciences and Industrial Division
increased 32.4% to $5.5 million from $4.1 million for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, sales of our Life Sciences and Industrial Division
increased 27.5% to $15.3 million from $12.0 million for the same period last year.
The increase in sales in fiscal 2006, compared to 2005, is mainly due to increased sales
activities in the curing market as well as market-share gains in the fluorescence illumination
market, following our efforts to expand international markets, mainly Europe and Asia.
Geographic distribution
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, sales to the Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa
(EMEA) and Asia-Pacific (APAC) accounted for 65%, 22% and 13% of global sales, respectively. For
the corresponding period last year, sales to the Americas, EMEA and APAC accounted for 69%, 22% and
9% of global sales, respectively. For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, sales to the Americas,
EMEA and APAC accounted for 61%, 24% and 15% of global sales, respectively. For the corresponding
period last year, sales to the Americas, EMEA and APAC accounted for 68%, 20% and 12% of global
sales, respectively.
Our sales to the Americas increased year-over-year in dollars, mainly in the United States and
Latin America due to the positive spending environment, as well as the market share we believe we
gained for our optical products. Also, the recent acquisition of Consultronics resulted in an
increase in sales made in the Americas, as most of its customer base is located in the United
States and Latin America. However, as a percentage of sales, our sales to the Americas decreased
year-over-year mainly because our sales to our top customer, who is located in the United States,
were unusually high in the third quarter and in the first nine months of fiscal 2005. For fiscal
2006, we expect sales to this customer to be lower than in 2005 as a result of its effort to reduce
its cost of fiber deployments by migrating to less expensive test solutions and methods. EXFO
remains the main supplier of optical test solutions to this customer. Excluding sales to this
customer, our sales to the Americas would have increased 63% in the third quarter of fiscal 2006
and 45% for the first nine months of 2006, compared to the corresponding periods last year.
Following our efforts to develop the EMEA market in the last several quarters, our sales in
this territory also increased significantly year-over-year, mainly due to improved market
penetration by both divisions. Namely, since the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we have been
8
recording sales with a Tier-1 network service provider, further increasing our sales to this
market year-over-year.
Our sales to the APAC market also improved significantly year-over-year. Over the last several
quarters, we strengthened our product offering, specifically implementing a multi-tiered platform
strategy to meet different customer demands and different price points and expanding our sales and
marketing activities in this region. Our increased focus and interaction with this market, combined
with our enhanced capability to win tenders, which may vary in number and importance, contributed
to our growth in the APAC region.
Through our two divisions, we sell our products to a broad range of customers, including NSPs,
cable TV operators, optical system and component manufacturers, as well as customers in the life
sciences and high-precision assembly sectors. During the three months ended May 31, 2006, we had
one customer that accounted for 19.4% of our total sales, and our top three customers accounted for
24.6% of our total sales. For the corresponding period last year, this same single customer
accounted for 30.8% of our total sales, and our top three customers accounted for 38.1% of our
sales. For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, we had one customer that accounted for 14.0% of our
total sales, and our top three customers accounted for 20.6% of our total sales. For the
corresponding period last year, this same single customer accounted for 25.9% of our total sales,
and our top three customers accounted for 30.9% of our total sales. Our significant sales increase,
despite the fact that our revenue from our top customer was significantly reduced is a good sign
that we have continued to strengthen our market acceptance, diversify our customer base and reduce
our sales concentration with a single customer. This also indicates that our 2nd and
3rd most important customers, who may vary from quarter to quarter, have gained in
importance as we continue our diversification efforts.
GROSS MARGIN
Gross margin amounted to 56.4% of sales for the three months ended May 31, 2006, compared to
56.2% for the same period last year.
Gross margin amounted to 55.7% of sales for the nine months ended May 31, 2006, compared to
54.7% for the same period last year.
The increase in our gross margin for the third quarter and for the nine months ended May 31,
2006, can be explained by the following factors. First, we succeeded in increasing the market
acceptance of our new products (designed in the last few years) on which we had focused our R&D
efforts to simultaneously create lower cost of goods and most advanced solutions. Second, the
significant rise in sales year-over-year resulted in an increase in manufacturing activities,
allowing us to better absorb our fixed manufacturing costs. Also, we were able to reduce our cost
of goods sold by better leveraging our supplier base. Furthermore, streamlined operations following
our consolidation action in fiscal 2005 and continued cost-reduction programs allowed us to further
improve our gross margin. Finally, recently acquired Consultronics contributed to the increase in
our gross margin in fiscal 2006 as its products have a slightly higher margin than our existing
ones. However, the shift in the geographic distribution of our sales resulted in more sales, in
percentage of total sales, made to the EMEA and APAC markets, where gross margins tend to be lower
as most of our sales to these markets are made through distribution channels. In addition, we are
facing aggressive pricing pressure worldwide. Finally, a stronger Canadian dollar, compared to the
US dollar, prevented us from further improving our gross margin as some cost of sales items are
denominated in Canadian dollars.
9
On an ongoing basis, we adjust the design of our products and over the past few months,
we experienced higher sales. Consequently, we were able to reuse excess inventories that were
written off during the telecom downturn.; excess inventory reuse accounted for approximately 0.7%
of sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and 1% of sales for the first nine months of 2006. For
the corresponding period last year, excess inventory reuse accounted for approximately 1.3% and
1.5% of sales, respectively. Inventory write-offs recorded during the telecom downturn were based
on our best estimate at that time.
Considering the expected sales growth in fiscal 2006, the effect of our late 2005
consolidation actions, the cost-effective design of our products, the increase in sales of protocol
products (which tend to generate higher margins), our tight control on operating costs as well as
the expected contribution from Consultronics, whose products have slightly higher margin than our
existing ones, we expect our gross margin to improve in 2006 and beyond. However, our gross margin
may fluctuate quarter-over-quarter as our sales may fluctuate. Furthermore, our gross margin can be
negatively affected by increased competitive pricing pressure, customer concentration and/or
consolidation, increased obsolescence costs, shifts in customer and product mix, under-absorption
of fixed manufacturing costs and increases in product offerings by other suppliers in our industry.
Finally, any further increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar would have a negative impact
on our gross margin in fiscal 2006.
SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, selling and administrative expenses were $11.1
million, or 31.3% of sales, compared to $8.6 million, or 32.7% of sales for the same period last
year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, selling and administrative expenses were $29.4
million, or 31.8% of sales, compared to $23.7 million, or 33.4% of sales for the same period last
year.
The increase in our selling and administrative expenses in dollars year-over-year is mainly
due to our decision to increase our sales activities to better leverage the significant research
and development investments of the prior years, which resulted in higher sales and marketing
expenditures (including number of employees). In addition, our commission expenses increased
year-over-year due to the increase in sales. Furthermore, a stronger Canadian dollar, compared to
the US dollar year-over-year, caused our selling and administrative expenses to increase, as more
than half of these are incurred in Canadian dollars. Finally, in the third quarter of fiscal 2006,
we had the full impact of the acquisition of Consultronics in our selling and administrative
expenses, increasing these expenses year-over-year. For the first nine months of fiscal 2006,
Consultronics contributed about four months to our selling and administrative expenses, which also
contributed to the increase in expenses year-over-year.
However, we were able to mitigate the increase in our selling and administrative expenses as
well as reduce these expenses in percentage of sales year-over-year due to tight cost-control
measures and the consolidation of our Life Sciences and Industrial Division. In addition, our
significant increase in revenues allowed us to reduce our selling and administrative expenses on a
percentage basis.
10
For the upcoming quarters, we expect our selling and administrative expenses to increase
in dollars, while remaining relatively stable as a percentage of sales. In particular, we now have
the full impact of the acquisition of Consultronics on our selling and administrative expenses.
Also, we expect our commission expenses to increase as sales volume increases. Furthermore,
considering our goal of becoming the leading player in the telecom test and measurement space, we
will intensify our sales and marketing efforts, both domestic and international, which will also
cause our expenses to rise. Finally, any further increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar
would also cause our selling and administrative expenses to increase, as more than half of these
expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, gross research and development expenses totaled $5.3
million, or 15.1% of sales, compared to $4.1 million, or 15.7% of sales for the same period last
year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, gross research and development expenses totaled $14.3
million, or 15.4% of sales, compared to $11.7 million, or 16.5% of sales for the same period last
year.
The increase in our gross research and development expenses in dollars for the third quarter
of fiscal 2006, compared to the same period last year, is due to the following reasons. First, in
the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we had the full impact of the acquisition of Consultronics, which
caused our gross R&D expenses to increase year-over-year. In addition, most of our gross research
and development expenses were incurred in Canadian dollars as we have consolidated most of our R&D
activities in Canada. Consequently, the increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar compared to
the US dollar year-over-year caused our gross research and development expenses to increase.
The increase in our gross research and development expenses in dollars for the first nine
months of fiscal 2006, compared to the same period last year, is due to the following reasons.
First, in the first nine months of fiscal 2006, Consultronics contributed about four months to our
gross R&D expenses, which caused these expenses to increase year-over-year. In addition, in fiscal
2006, as mentioned above, our gross research and development expenses were negatively affected by
the increased strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar year-over-year. Finally,
mix and timing of research and development projects in the first nine months of fiscal 2006
resulted in more gross research and development expenses during that period compared to the
corresponding period last year.
The decrease in gross research and development expenses as a percentage of sales in the third
quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2006 is directly related to the significant increase in
sales year-over-year for both periods.
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, tax credits and grants from the Canadian federal and
provincial governments for research and development activities were $1.2 million, or 23.3% of gross
research and development expenses, compared to $771,000, or 18.7% of gross research and development
expenses for the same period last year. During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we received a tax
assessment from the Canadian tax authorities for fiscal 2004 and we were granted additional tax
credits in the amount of $215,000 that was recorded in the third quarter. Also, the increase
strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar year-over-year caused our tax credits and
grants to increase in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 compared
11
to the same period last year as these credits and grants are earned in Canada. This explains
most of the increase of research and development tax credits as percentage of gross research and
development expenses year-over-year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, these tax credits and grants were $3.2 million, or
22.1% of gross research and development expenses, compared to $2.8 million, or 24.1% of gross
research and development expenses for the same period last year.
As mentioned above, during the first nine months of fiscal 2006, we were granted additional
tax credits in the amount of $215,000 for fiscal 2004. Excluding this amount, tax credits and
grants would have been just slightly higher in dollars in the first nine months of fiscal 2006
compared to the same period last year, despite a significant increase in our gross research and
development expenses year-over-year. During the first nine months of fiscal 2006, our tax credits
and grants were lower as a percentage of gross research and development expenses compared to the
same period last year, mainly due to the mix of our research and development projects, which
resulted in a lower portion of our expenses being eligible for tax credits in fiscal 2006 compared
to 2005. However, the increased strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar
year-over-year caused our tax credits and grants to increase in the first nine months of fiscal
2006 compared tot the same period last year.
Nonetheless, we still invested significantly in research and development activities in fiscal
2006 as we firmly believe that innovation and new product introductions are key in gaining market
share in the current economic environment and ensuring the long-term growth and profitability of
EXFO.
For fiscal 2006, we have and expect to increase our research and development expenses at the
same rate as we grow our sales, given our focus on innovation, our desire to gain market share and
our goal to exceed customer needs and expectations. Also, any further increase in the strength of
the Canadian dollar would cause our net research and development expenses to increase, as most of
these are incurred in Canadian dollars.
AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, amortization of property, plant and equipment was
$883,000, compared to $1.1 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended May 31,
2006, amortization expenses amounted to $2.7 million, compared to $3.2 million for the same period
last year. The decrease in amortization expenses in fiscal 2006, compared to 2005, despite the
increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar and the acquisition of
Consultronics is mainly due to the fact that some of our property, plant and equipment became fully
amortized during fiscal 2005 and 2006.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, amortization of intangible assets was $994,000,
compared to $1.2 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended May 31, 2006,
amortization expenses amounted to $3.4 million, compared to $3.6 million for the same period last
year. The decrease in amortization expenses in fiscal 2006, compared to 2005, despite the increase
in the strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar and the acquisition of
Consultronics, is mainly due to the fact that some significant intangible assets became fully
amortized during fiscal 2006.
12
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
On June 23, 2006, we entered into an agreement to sell our building designated as a long-lived
asset held for sale in the balance sheet, along with some equipment. Based on this agreement, we
recorded an impairment charge of $604,000, representing the excess of the carrying value of these
assets over the net selling price. The charge was recorded as an impairment of long-lived assets in
the statements of earnings for the periods ended May 31, 2006.
GOVERNMENT GRANTS
During 1998, we entered into an agreement with the Quebec Minister of Industry, Commerce,
Science and Technology (The Minister). Pursuant to this agreement, the Minister agreed to
contribute, in the form of grants, up to CDN$2,200,000 (US$1,995,000) over the period from January
1, 1998, through December 31, 2002, payable based on the number of full-time jobs created during
that period.
The above grants were subject to the condition that jobs we created pursuant to the agreement
be maintained for a period of at least five years from the date of creation. Since the beginning of
the program, we deferred in the balance sheet CDN$1,450,000 (US$1,307,000) from the amounts
received until we received the final approval by the sponsor of the program. In June 2006, the
sponsor of the program granted us with its final approval and we recorded non-recurring revenue of
CDN$1,450,000 (US$1,307,000) in the earnings from operations in the statement of earnings for the
three months ended May 31, 2006.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
For the three and the nine months ended May 31, 2005, restructuring charges amounted to
$38,000 and $292,000, respectively. Most of these charges were recorded in conjunction with the
consolidation of our Photonics and Life Sciences Division. This consolidation process was completed
during fiscal 2005. Consequently, we had no restructuring charges in fiscal 2006.
INTEREST INCOME
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, interest income amounted to $796,000 compared to
$617,000 for the same period last year. During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, our interest
income was higher than the corresponding period of 2005, mainly because of the increase in our
average cash position due to cash flows from operating activities and because of the increase in
interest rates year-over-year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, interest income amounted to $2.2 million compared to
$2.0 million for the same period last year. The increase in interest income year-over-year is the
result of the increase in our average cash position due to cash flows from operating activities and
the increase in interest rates. However, during the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we recovered
R&D tax credits earned in previous years and we were granted $249,000 in interest by the tax
authorities.
13
FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOSS
Foreign exchange gains and losses are the result of the translation of operating activities
denominated in currencies other than the Canadian dollar.
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, the foreign exchange loss amounted to $81,000,
compared to $57,000 for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, the foreign exchange loss amounted to $612,000
compared to $829,000 for the same period last year. The significant exchange losses recorded in the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2006 are the result of the significant increase in the value
of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar during these periods. However, the increase in the
value of the Canadian dollar was more significant in fiscal 2005 compared to 2006, which resulted
in a higher exchange loss in 2005. On the other hand, higher levels of activity in the first nine
months of fiscal 2006, compared to the same period last year, contributed to increase the exchange
loss increase in 2006.
It should be noted that foreign exchange rate fluctuations also flow through the P&L line
items as a significant portion of our operating items are denominated in Canadian dollars and we
report our results in US dollars.
We manage our exposure to currency risks with forward exchange contracts. In addition, some of
our Canadian entities operating activities are denominated in US dollars or other currencies,
which further hedges these risks. However, any further increase in the value of the Canadian
dollar, compared to the US dollar, would have a negative impact on our operating results.
INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended May 31, 2006, we recorded an income tax expense of $819,000
compared to $793,000 for the same period last year. For the nine months ended May 31, 2006, we
recorded an income tax expense of $2.0 million compared to $2.2 million for the same period last
year.
Most of the income tax expenses recorded in fiscal 2005 and 2006 represent income taxes
payable at the Canadian federal level, which are reduced by research and development tax credits
that are recorded against gross research and development expenses in the statements of earnings.
We record a full valuation allowance against our future income tax assets because it is more
likely than not that these assets will not be recovered. The valuation allowance will be reversed
once we will have concluded that realization of future income tax assets is more likely than not.
Consequently, our income tax rates are distorted compared to statutory rates.
14
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Requirements and Capital Resources
As at May 31, 2006, cash and short-term investments consisted of $104.0 million, almost flat
compared to the previous quarter, while our working capital was at $138.7 million. During the third
quarter of fiscal 2006, we recorded an unrealized foreign exchange gain of $3.4 million on our cash
and short-term investments. This unrealized foreign exchange gain resulted from the translation, in
US dollars, of our Canadian-dollar-denominated cash and short-term investments and was recorded in
the cumulative translation adjustment in the balance sheet. On the other hand, cash flows from
operating activities used $2.3 million of cash and we made cash payments of $963,000 and $219,000
for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and for the acquisition of Consultronics,
respectively.
Our short-term investments consist of commercial paper or bonds issued by 11 (12 as of
February 28, 2006) high-credit quality corporations and trusts; therefore, we consider the risk of
non-performance of these financial instruments to be remote. For the purposes of managing our cash
position, we have established a cash management policy, which we follow and monitor on a regular
basis. These short-term investments will be used for working capital and other general corporate
purposes, including other potential acquisitions.
We believe that our cash and short-term investments, combined with an available line of credit
of $7.3 million, will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital requirements for the
foreseeable future, including the remaining of the purchase price payable for the acquisition of
Consultronics of $1.2 million. However, possible operating losses and/or possible investments in or
acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies may require additional
financing. There can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be available
when required or, if available, that it can be secured on satisfactory terms. Our line of credit
bears interest at prime rate.
Sources and Uses of Cash
We finance our operations and meet our capital expenditure requirements mainly through cash
flows from operating activities, the use of our cash and short-term investments as well as the
issuance of subordinate voting shares.
Upon the acquisition of Consultronics, we also assume capital leases of $533,000 (CA$606,000),
including the current portion. This long-term debt, which bears interest at 5%, matures in 2010.
Operating Activities
Cash flows used by operating activities were $2.3 million for the three months ended May 31,
2006, compared to cash flows provided of $3.8 million for the same period last year. Cash flows
used by operating activities in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 were mainly attributable to the
negative net change in non-cash operating items of $7.4 million, less the net earnings after items
not affecting cash of $5.1 million. During the third quarter of 2006, our accounts receivable, our
income taxes and tax credits recoverable as well as our inventories increased, resulting in
negative effects on cash flows of $5.1 million, $612,000 and $182,000 respectively. In addition,
our accounts payable and accrued liabilities decreased, also resulting in negative effects on cash
flows of $1.4 million.
15
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $4.1 million for the nine months ended May
31, 2006, compared to $8.5 million for the same period last year. Cash flows provided by operating
activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2006 were mainly attributable to the net earnings
after items not affecting cash of $12.2 million and the negative net change in non-cash operating
items of $8.2 million. During the first nine months of fiscal 2006, our accounts receivable, our
income taxes and tax credits recoverable as well as our inventories increased, resulting in
negative effects on cash flows of $4.2 million, $1.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively. On the
other hand, our accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased, resulting in positive effects
on cash flows of $615,000.
The increase in our sales due in part to the contribution of Consultronics during both the
third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2006, as well as the timing of these sales within
these periods explain the increase in our accounts receivable in the third quarter and the first
nine months of 2006. Our income taxes and tax credits recoverable increased for both the third
quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2006 due to research and development tax credits earned
during these periods but not yet recovered. Our inventories increased for both the third quarter
and the first nine months of 2006 in order to sustain our increased sales activities. Finally, our
accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased in the first nine months of 2006 due to
increased level of activities.
Investing Activities
Cash flows provided by investing activities were $2.0 million for the three months ended May
31, 2006, compared to cash flows used of $4.1 million for the same period last year. In the third
quarter of fiscal 2006, we disposed of $3.2 million worth of short-term investments and made cash
payments of $963,000 and $219,000 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment as well as the
acquisition of Consultronics, respectively. For the corresponding period last year, we acquired
$3.7 million worth of short-term investments with cash flows from operating activities and paid
$403,000 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.
Cash flows used by investing activities were $7.2 million for the nine months ended May 31,
2006, compared to $10.3 million for the same period last year. During the first nine months of
fiscal 2006, we made cash payments of $17.7 million and $2.5 million for the acquisition of
Consultronics and the purchase of property, plant and equipment, respectively. In order to finance
a portion of these payments, we disposed of $13.0 million worth of short-term investments during
the first nine months of fiscal 2006. For the corresponding period last year, we acquired $9.1
million worth of short-term investments with cash flows from operating activities and paid $1.2
million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.
FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
We utilize forward exchange contracts to manage our foreign currency exposure. Our policy is
not to utilize those derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Our forward exchange contracts, which are used to hedge anticipated US-dollar-denominated
sales, qualify for hedge accounting; therefore, foreign exchange translation gains and losses on
these contracts are recognized as an adjustment of the revenues when the corresponding sales are
recorded.
16
As at May 31, 2006, we held forward exchange contracts to sell US dollars at various forward
rates, which are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
Expiry dates: |
|
amounts |
|
|
contractual forward rates |
|
June 2006 to August 2006 |
|
$ |
9,600,000 |
|
|
|
1.2245 |
|
September 2006 to December 2008 |
|
|
48,300,000 |
|
|
|
1.1657 |
|
As at May 31, 2006, the fair value of our forward exchange contracts, which represents the
difference between their contractual amounts and their current trading value, amounted to an
unrecognized gain of $5.9 million ($4.7 million as at February 28, 2006).
CONTINGENCY
As discussed in note 10 to our interim consolidated financial statements, EXFO was named as a
defendant in a U.S. securities class action related to its initial public offering (IPO) in June
2000. The complaints allege that the prospectus and the registration statement for the IPO failed
to disclose that the underwriters allegedly received excessive commissions and that the
underwriters and some investors collaborated in order to inflate the price of EXFOs stock in the
after-market.
In June 2003, a committee of the EXFOs Board of Directors conditionally approved a proposed
settlement between the issuer defendants, the individual defendants, and the plaintiffs. If
approved, the settlement would provide, among other things, a release of the EXFO and of the
individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the amended
complaint. EXFO would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the settlement, including
agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims EXFO may have against its
underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by
EXFOs insurance carriers.
On June 25, 2004, the Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court
granted the preliminary approval motion on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications. On
August 31, 2005, the court issued a preliminary order further approving the modifications to the
settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The court also appointed the Notice
Administrator for the settlement and ordered that notice of the settlement be distributed to all
settlement class members beginning on November 15, 2005. A settlement fairness hearing was held on
April 24, 2006; however, no ruling has been issued yet by the court. If the court determines that
the settlement is fair to the class members, the settlement will be approved. There can be no
assurance that this proposed settlement would be approved and implemented in its current form, or
at all. Therefore, it is not possible to predict the final outcome of the case, nor to determine
the amount of any possible losses. If the settlement process fails, EXFO will continue to defend
its position in this litigation that the claims against it, and its officers, are without merit.
Accordingly, no provision for this case has been made in the interim consolidated financial
statements as at May 31, 2006.
17
SHARE CAPITAL AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Share capital
As at June 27, 2006, EXFO had 37,643,000 multiple voting shares outstanding, entitling to 10
votes each and 31,579,199 subordinate voting shares outstanding. The multiple voting shares and the
subordinate voting shares are unlimited as to number and without par value.
Long-Term Incentive Plan and Deferred Share Unit Plan
The aggregate number of subordinate voting shares covered by stock options, restricted share
units (RSUs) and deferred share units (DSUs) granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the
Deferred Share Unit Plan was 2,909,121 as at May 31, 2006. The maximum number of subordinate voting
shares issuable under these two plans cannot exceed 6,306,153 shares. The following tables
summarize information about stock options, RSUs and DSUs granted to the members of the Board of
Directors and to Management and Corporate Officers of the company and its subsidiaries as at May
31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of issued |
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
exercise |
Stock Options |
|
Number |
|
outstanding |
|
price |
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
(one individual)
|
|
|
179,642 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
9.05 |
|
Board of Directors (five individuals)
|
|
|
194,375 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
6.23 |
|
Management and Corporate Officers
(nine individuals)
|
|
|
335,028 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709,045 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
$ |
10.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
Restricted Share Units (RSU) |
|
Number |
|
outstanding |
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
(one individual)
|
|
|
34,566 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Management and Corporate Officers
(nine individuals)
|
|
|
193,372 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,938 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
Deferred Share Units (DSU) |
|
Number |
|
outstanding |
Board of Directors (five individuals) |
|
|
38,076 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As at May 31, 2006, our off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of letters of guarantee and
forward exchange contracts.
18
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
As of May 31, 2006, we did not have interests in any variable interest entities.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Over the past few years, we have managed our business in a difficult environment; focused on
research and development programs for new and innovative products aimed at expected growth pockets
in our sector; continued the development of our domestic and international markets; and made
strategic acquisitions. However, we operate in a highly competitive sector that is in constant
evolution and, as a result, we encounter various risks and uncertainties that must be given
appropriate consideration in our strategic management policies.
We are exposed to currency risks due to the export of our Canadian-manufactured products, the
large majority of which are denominated in US dollars. These risks are partially hedged by
operating expenses denominated in US dollars, the purchase of raw materials in US dollars and
forward exchange contracts. The increased strength of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US
dollar, over the last two years caused our operating expenses to increase. Any further increase in
the value of the Canadian dollar in the coming months would negatively affect our results of
operations.
Secondly, during the last few quarters, we experienced high sales concentration with a
U.S.-based Tier-1 telecom carrier. Although we believe this sales concentration is largely due to
our leadership position in the FTTx test market, orders from this customer can fluctuate in
upcoming quarters, depending on the carriers deployment needs, products requirements and schedule.
In addition, risks and uncertainties related to the telecommunications test and measurement
industry involve the rapid development of new products that may have short life cycles and require
extensive research and development; the difficulty of adequately predicting market size and trends;
the difficulty of retaining highly skilled employees; and the ability to quickly adapt our cost
structure to changing market conditions in order to achieve profitability.
Furthermore, given our strategic goals for growth and competitive positioning in our industry,
we are continuously expanding into international markets. This exposes us to certain risks and
uncertainties related to changes in local laws and regulations, multiple technological standards,
protective legislation and pricing pressure.
Also, while strategic acquisitions, like those we have made in the past, the recent
acquisition of Consultronics and possibly others in the future, are essential to our long-term
growth, they also expose us to certain risks and uncertainties related to the rapid and effective
integration of these businesses as well as their products, technologies and personnel. Finally,
integration requires the dedication of management resources, which may detract their attention from
our day-to-day business and operations.
The economic environment of our industry could also result in some of our customers
experiencing difficulties and, consequently, this could have a negative effect on our results
especially in terms of future sales and recoverability of accounts receivable. However, the
sectorial and geographic diversity of our customer base provides us with a reasonable level of
protection in this area. Finally, other financial instruments, which potentially subject us to
credit risks, consist mainly of cash, short-term investments and forward exchange contracts. Our
19
short-term investments consist of debt instruments issued by 11 high-credit quality
corporations and trusts. Our cash and forward exchange contracts are held with or issued by
high-credit quality financial institutions; therefore, we consider the risk of non-performance on
these instruments to be remote.
For a more complete understanding of risk factors that may affect us, please refer to the risk
factors set forth in our disclosure documents published with securities commissions at
www.sedar.com in Canada or www.edgar.com in the U.S.
20