e6vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of April, 2006
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
(Translation of registrants name into English)
400 Godin Avenue, Quebec, Quebec, Canada G1M 2K2
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes
o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-o.
On April 4, 2006, EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc., a Canadian corporation, reported its
results of operations for the second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2006. This report on Form
6-K sets forth the news release relating to EXFOs announcement and certain information relating to
EXFOs financial condition and results of operations for the second fiscal quarter of the 2006
fiscal year. This press release and information relating to EXFOs financial condition and results
of operations for the second fiscal quarter of the 2006 fiscal year are hereby incorporated as a
document by reference to Form F-3 (Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933)
declared effective as of July 30, 2001 and to Form F-3 (Registration Statement under the Securities
Act of 1933) declared effective as of March 11, 2002 and to amend certain material information as
set forth in these two Form F-3 documents.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO ELECTRO-OPTICAL ENGINEERING INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Germain Lamonde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Germain Lamonde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: April 7, 2006
EXFO Reports Strong Profitable Growth in Second Quarter
§ |
|
Posts tenth consecutive quarter of sales growth at 30.0% year-over-year and 11.2% sequentially to reach US$30.1 million |
|
§ |
|
Generates fifth consecutive quarter of GAAP net earnings at US$1.4 million compared to break-even in the same period
last year |
|
§ |
|
Announces and completes acquisition of Consultronics to strengthen triple-play, VoIP and IPTV test offerings in access
networks |
|
§ |
|
Launches seven new products including critical next-generation SONET/SDH protocol test solutions up to 10 Gb/s and
multi-medium, multi-moduleFTB-200 Compact Platform |
QUEBEC CITY, CANADA, April 4, 2006EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc. (NASDAQ: EXFO; TSX:
EXF.SV) reported today strong profitable growth for its second quarter of fiscal 2006.
Sales increased 30.0% to US$30.1 million in the second quarter ended February 28, 2006, from
US$23.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 and 11.2% from US$27.0 million in the first quarter
of 2006. Net bookings reached US$28.3 million for a book-to-bill ratio of 0.94 in the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to US$24.9 million in the same period last year and US$30.6 million
in the first quarter of 2006.
Gross margin amounted to 55.3% of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to 54.9% in
the second quarter of 2005 and 55.4% in the first quarter of 2006.
GAAP net earnings in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 totaled US$1.4 million, or US$0.02 per
diluted share, compared to net earnings of US$9,000, or US$0.00 per diluted share, in the same
period last year and net earnings of US$0.4 million, or US$0.01 per diluted share, in the first
quarter of 2006.
GAAP net earnings in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 included US$1.1 million in amortization of
intangible assets and US$0.3 million in stock-based compensation costs.
During the second quarter, EXFO announced and subsequently completed its acquisition of the assets
of Consultronics Limited, a leading supplier of test equipment for copper-based broadband access
networks. Consultronics, which has been integrated into EXFOs Telecom Division, contributed about
one month to the companys consolidated financial results in the second quarter.
I am really pleased with our strong execution in the first half of fiscal 2006 as we reached
several key strategic milestones, said Germain Lamonde, EXFOs Chairman, President and CEO. First
of all, we strengthened our position and product offering in the growing triple-play access test
market through the acquisition of Consultronics. Secondly, we substantially grew our international
business and customer base to enhance revenue diversification. Thirdly, we launched several new
products including the all-important multi-medium, multi-module FTB-200 Compact Platform for the
telecom SuperTech as well as next-generation SONET/SDH test modules up to 10 Gb/s for our FTB-200,
FTB-400 and IQS-500 platforms. While achieving these goals, we extended our strong sequence of
consecutive quarters of sales growth, cash flows from operations and GAAP net earnings to ten, nine
and five, respectively.
Selected Financial Information
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2006 |
|
|
Q1 2006 |
|
|
Q2 2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Segmented results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
25,254 |
|
|
$ |
22,076 |
|
|
$ |
19,469 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
$ |
27,044 |
|
|
$ |
23,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
$ |
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other selected information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net earnings |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
1,225 |
|
Stock-based compensation costs |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses amounted to US$9.3 million, or 30.9% of sales, in the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to US$7.7 million, or 33.4% of sales, in the same period last year
and US$9.1 million, or 33.5% of sales, in the first quarter of 2006.
Gross research and development expenses reached US$4.9 million, or 16.4% of sales, in the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to US$3.8 million, or 16.5% of sales, in the second quarter of 2005
and US$4.0 million, or 14.8% of sales, in the first quarter of 2006.
Net R&D expenses totaled US$3.9 million, or 13.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
compared to US$2.8 million, or 12.0% of sales, in the same period last year and US$3.1 million, or
11.6% of sales, in the first quarter of 2006.
Second-Quarter Business Highlights
§ |
|
Market expansionEXFO increased its sales 30.0%
year-over-year to $30.1 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2006. Geographically, sales outside of the
Americas improved to 43.0% of total sales in the second
quarter of 2006 from 35.4% in the second quarter of
2005. In terms of customer spending, EXFOs largest
customer represented 8.5% of sales in the second quarter
of 2006 compared to 21.4% in the same period last year.
Excluding this customer, sales would have increased
51.1% year-over-year in the second quarter of 2006.
These latest results demonstrate EXFOs on-going efforts
to diversify its revenue base both on a geographic and
customer basis. |
|
§ |
|
ProfitabilityEXFO was GAAP profitable for a fifth
consecutive quarter, reporting net earnings of US$1.4
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. GAAP net
earnings include US$1.4 million in amortization of
intangible assets and stock-based compensation costs.
The company also generated cash flows from operating
activities for a ninth consecutive reporting period with
US$5.4 million in the second quarter of 2006. |
|
§ |
|
InnovationEXFO launched seven new products in the
second quarter including the two-slot FTB-200 Compact
Platform for multi-layer and multi-medium testing, the
handheld AXS-100 OTDR for fiber-to-the-x (FTTx) test
applications, SONET/SDH test modules reaching
transmission rates up to 10 Gb/s for the FTB-200 Compact
Platform, and next-generation SONET/SDH test modules
reaching 10 Gb/s for the FTB-400 field-test and IQS-500
R&D/manufacturing platforms. Altogether, EXFO launched
11 new test solutions in the first half of fiscal 2006,
while 34.7% of sales were derived from products that
have been on the market two years or less. |
Updated Corporate Metrics
To reflect the Consultronics acquisition and mid-year results, EXFO updated one out of three
corporate metrics for fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Objective |
|
New Metric |
|
Former Metric |
|
After
Q2 |
2006 |
Increase sales through market-share gains
|
|
25% sales growth year-over-year
|
|
15% sales growth year-over-year
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
Maximize profitability
|
|
5% operating margin
|
|
5% operating margin
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
Focus on innovation
|
|
40% of sales from
new products (on
the market two
years or less)
|
|
40% of sales from
new products (on
the market two
years or less)
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
Given the impact of the Consultronics acquisition and solid execution leading to market-share
gains in the first half of fiscal 2006, were raising our sales growth metric to 25%
year-over-year, while our key performance indicator for profitability is expected to reach an
operating margin of 5% for the fiscal year despite additional amortization of intangible asset
expenses related to the acquisition, Mr. Lamonde added. With regard to innovation, were
continuing to target 40% of sales from new products, which is a lofty goal for any company in the
high-tech industry.
Business Outlook
Based on a full contribution from Consultronics, newly launched products, a favorable market
environment and internal momentum, EXFO forecasts sales between US$33.0 million and US$36.0 million
and GAAP net earnings between US$0.01 and US$0.04 per diluted share for the third quarter ending
May 31, 2006. GAAP net earnings include US$0.02 per diluted share in amortization of intangible
assets and stock-based compensation costs.
Conference Call and Webcast
EXFO will host a conference call today at 5 p.m. (Eastern time) to review its financial results for
the second quarter of fiscal 2006. To listen to the conference call and participate in the question
period via telephone, dial 1-416-620-2406. Germain Lamonde, Chairman, President and CEO, and Pierre
Plamondon, CA, Vice-President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, will participate in the call.
An audio replay of the conference call will be available one hour after the event until 7 p.m. on
April 11, 2006. The replay number is 1-402-977-9140 and the reservation number is 21284959. The
audio Webcast of the conference call will also be available on EXFOs Website at www.EXFO.com,
under the Investors section.
About EXFO
EXFO is a recognized test and measurement expert in the global telecommunications industry. The
Telecom Division, which represents the majority of the companys business, offers a full suite of
test solutions and monitoring systems to Network Service Providers, Cable TV Operators, Telecom
System Vendors and Component Manufacturers in approximately 70 countries. EXFO is the global market
leader for portable optical test solutions and a leading supplier of protocol and access test
solutions to enable triple-play deployments and converged IP networking. Its PC/Windows-based
modular FTB-200; FTB-400 and IQS-500 test platforms host a wide range of modular test solutions
across optical, physical, data and network layers, while maximizing technology reuse across several
market segments. The Life Sciences and Industrial Division, which leverages several core telecom
technologies, offers value-added solutions in the life sciences and high-precision assembly sectors
based on advanced spot-curing, fluorescence microscopy and nanopositioning solutions. For more
information about EXFO, visit www.EXFO.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and we intend that such forward-looking statements be
subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Forward-looking statements are statements other than
historical information or statements of current condition. Words such as may, will, expect,
believe, anticipate, intend, could, estimate, continue, or the negative or comparable terminology
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to
expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events and circumstances are
considered forward-looking statements. They are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking
statements due to various factors including consolidation in the global telecommunications test and
measurement industry; capital spending levels in the telecommunications, life sciences and
high-precision assembly sectors; concentration of sales; fluctuating exchange rates and our ability
to execute in these uncertain conditions; the effects of the additional actions we have taken in
response to such economic uncertainty (including workforce reductions, ability to quickly adapt
cost structures with anticipated levels of business, ability to manage inventory levels with market
demand); market acceptance of our new products and other upcoming products; limited visibility with
regards to customer orders and the timing of such orders; our ability to successfully integrate our
acquired and to-be-acquired businesses; the retention of key technical and management personnel;
and future economic, competitive and market conditions. Assumptions relating to the foregoing
involve judgments and risks, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which
are beyond our control. Other risk factors that may affect our future performance and operations
are detailed in our Annual Report on Form 20-F and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Canadian securities commissions. We believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information currently available
to us, but we cannot assure you that the expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly,
you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These statements speak
only as of the date of this document. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any of them to
reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this document.
For more information
Vance Oliver
Manager, Investor Relations
(418) 683-0913, Ext. 3733
vance.oliver@exfo.com
-30-
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in
thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
4,777 |
|
|
$ |
7,119 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
99,064 |
|
|
|
104,883 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $350
($352 as at August 31, 2005) |
|
|
16,176 |
|
|
|
13,945 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
Income taxes and tax credits recoverable |
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
Inventories (note 4) |
|
|
24,237 |
|
|
|
17,749 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,010 |
|
|
|
149,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes recoverable |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
17,162 |
|
|
|
13,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset held for sale |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
12,340 |
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
26,199 |
|
|
|
20,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,750 |
|
|
$ |
190,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 5) |
|
$ |
18,666 |
|
|
$ |
12,201 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,690 |
|
|
|
13,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government grants |
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,141 |
|
|
|
17,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
522,031 |
|
|
|
521,875 |
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
2,949 |
|
Deficit |
|
|
(380,125 |
) |
|
|
(381,846 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
38,199 |
|
|
|
30,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,609 |
|
|
|
173,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,750 |
|
|
$ |
190,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(in thousand of US dollars, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
$ |
57,110 |
|
|
$ |
23,135 |
|
|
$ |
44,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (1,2) |
|
|
13,440 |
|
|
|
25,504 |
|
|
|
10,431 |
|
|
|
20,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
16,626 |
|
|
|
31,606 |
|
|
|
12,704 |
|
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative (1) |
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
|
7,728 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
Net research and development (1)
(note 6) |
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
Amortization of property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
15,218 |
|
|
|
29,515 |
|
|
|
12,886 |
|
|
|
25,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (note 7) |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares
outstanding (000s) |
|
|
68,591 |
|
|
|
68,581 |
|
|
|
68,528 |
|
|
|
68,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of
shares outstanding (000s)
(note 9) |
|
|
69,152 |
|
|
|
69,105 |
|
|
|
68,968 |
|
|
|
68,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Stock-based compensation costs
included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Net research and development |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) The cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown separately. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Deficit
and Contributed Surplus
(in thousand of US dollars)
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Balance Beginning of period |
|
$ |
(381,846 |
) |
|
$ |
(380,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct (add) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period |
|
$ |
(380,125 |
) |
|
$ |
(382,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Balance Beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation costs |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(2,364 |
) |
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on short-term investments |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Stock-based compensation costs |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in non-cash operating items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
4,120 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Income taxes and tax credits |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(1,775 |
) |
|
|
(2,908 |
) |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
6,334 |
|
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to short-term investments |
|
|
(279,670 |
) |
|
|
(411,045 |
) |
|
|
(223,561 |
) |
|
|
(288,647 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal and maturity of
short-term investments |
|
|
288,500 |
|
|
|
420,899 |
|
|
|
218,943 |
|
|
|
283,273 |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets |
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
Business combination (note 3) |
|
|
(17,497 |
) |
|
|
(17,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,600 |
) |
|
|
(9,211 |
) |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
(6,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on
cash |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash |
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
(2,342 |
) |
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Beginning of period |
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
7,119 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash End of period |
|
$ |
4,777 |
|
|
$ |
4,777 |
|
|
$ |
4,258 |
|
|
$ |
4,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
1 |
|
Interim financial information |
|
|
|
The financial information as at February 28, 2006, and for the three- and six-month periods
ended February 28, 2005 and 2006, is unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the results of these periods in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada have been included. The adjustments made were of a normal
and recurring nature. Interim results may not necessarily be indicative of results anticipated
for the entire year. |
|
|
|
These interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in Canada and use the same accounting policies and methods used
in the preparation of the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements.
However, all disclosures required for annual financial statements have not been included in
these financial statements. Consequently, these interim consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements. |
|
2 |
|
New accounting standards and pronouncements |
|
|
|
In January 2005, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) issued four new
accounting standards in relation to financial instruments: Section 3855, Financial Instruments
Recognition and Measurement; Section 3865, Hedges; Section 1530, Comprehensive Income;
and Section 3251, Equity. |
|
|
|
Section 3855 expands on Section 3860, Financial Instruments Disclosure and Presentation, by
prescribing when a financial instrument is to be recognized on the balance sheet and at what
amount. It also specifies how financial instrument gains and losses are to be presented in the
financial statements. |
|
|
|
Section 3865 provides an alternative to Section 3855 for entities that choose to designate
qualifying transactions as hedges for accounting purposes. It replaces and expands on Accounting
Guideline 13, Hedging Relationships, and on the hedging guidance in Section 1650, Foreign
Currency Translation, by specifying how hedge accounting is applied and what disclosures it
requires. |
|
|
|
Section 1530, Comprehensive Income, introduces a new requirement to temporarily present
certain gains and losses outside net income. |
|
|
|
Consequently, Section 3250, Surplus, has been revised as Section 3251, Equity. |
|
|
|
Sections 1530, 3251, 3855 and 3865 apply to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006.
The company will adopt these new standards on September 1, 2007. While the company is currently
assessing the effects of these new standards, impacts consistent with the adjustments described
under note 21 item b) of the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements are
expected. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
3 |
|
Business combination |
|
|
|
On January 26, 2006, the company acquired substantially all the assets of Consultronics Limited.
Based in Toronto, Canada, and with operations in the United Kingdom and Hungary, Consultronics
was a privately held company specializing in x-Digital Subscriber Line (xDSL), Internet Protocol
TV and Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) test solutions for broadband access networks. |
|
|
|
This acquisition was settled for a total cash consideration valued at $19,289,000 or $19,034,000
net of $255,000 of cash acquired. The total consideration includes severance expenses of 660,000
for the termination of employees of the acquired business as well as other acquisition-related
costs of $541,000; it also includes the payment of a long-term debt of $688,000. As at February
28, 2006, the company had paid $17,497,000 of the total consideration and the remaining of
$1,537,000, or $1,551,000 converted at the quarter-end exchange rate, was included in the
accounts payable and other liabilities in the balance sheet (note 5). |
|
|
|
A part of the consideration is based on the net book value of some assets of the acquired
business on the date of closing and adjustments to the consideration may occur upon the audit of
the financial statements of the acquired business. |
|
|
|
This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and, consequently, the results of
operations of the acquired business have been included in the consolidated statement of earnings
of the company since January 26, 2006, being the date of acquisition. |
|
|
|
As at February 28, 2006, the company has not yet finalized the purchase price allocation as it
continues to assess the value of the acquired business core technology assets and an audit of
the acquired business financial statements is currently underway. However, based on
managements preliminary estimates of the fair value of net assets acquired at the date of
acquisition, the purchase price, including acquisition-related costs, should be allocated as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
5,427 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,121 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
8,709 |
|
Current liabilities assumed |
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
Capital leases assumed |
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net identifiable assets acquired |
|
|
14,162 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
19,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired core technology is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of
five years. |
|
|
|
This business, including acquired goodwill, reports to the Telecom Division. Acquired goodwill
is deductible for tax purposes. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
12,995 |
|
|
$ |
9,373 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
2,683 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
8,559 |
|
|
|
7,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,237 |
|
|
$ |
17,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
$ |
8,640 |
|
|
$ |
5,781 |
|
Salaries and social benefits |
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Tax on capital |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Business combination (note 3) |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,666 |
|
|
$ |
12,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the warranty provision are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Balance Beginning of period |
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
Provision |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Addition from business combination |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)
6 |
|
Net research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Gross research and
development
expenses |
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
8,946 |
|
|
$ |
3,820 |
|
|
$ |
7,619 |
|
Research and
development
tax credits
and grants |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,906 |
|
|
$ |
7,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,781 |
|
|
$ |
5,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
During the three- and six-month periods ended February 28, 2005 and 2006, the company recorded
income taxes of $697,000, $1,422,000, $657,000 and $1,222,000, respectively. Most of these
income taxes represent income taxes payable at the Canadian federal level, which are reduced by
research and development tax credits that are recorded against gross research and development
expenses in the statements of earnings. |
|
|
|
The company records a full valuation allowance against its future income tax assets because it
is more likely than not that these assets will not be recovered. This caused its income tax rate
to be distorted in relation to its pre-tax accounting income. |
|
8 |
|
Contingency |
|
|
|
On November 27, 2001, a class action suit was filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York against the company, four of the underwriters of its Initial
Public Offering and some of its executive officers pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and Sections 11, 12 and 16 of the Securities Act of
1933. This class action alleges that the companys registration statement and prospectus filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2000, contained material
misrepresentations and/or omissions resulting from (i) the underwriters allegedly soliciting and
receiving additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange
for which they allocated material portions of the shares issued in connection with the companys
Initial Public Offering; and (ii) the underwriters allegedly entering into agreements with
customers whereby shares issued in connection with the companys Initial Public Offering would
be allocated to those customers in exchange for which customers agreed to purchase additional
amounts of shares in the after-market at pre-determined prices. |
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
On April 19, 2002, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint containing master allegations
against all of the underwriters in all of the 310 cases included in this class action and also
filed an amended complaint containing allegations specific to four of the companys
underwriters, the company and two of its executive officers. In addition to the allegations
mentioned above, the amended complaint alleges that the underwriters (i) used their analysts to
manipulate the stock market; and (ii) implemented schemes that allowed issuer insiders to sell
their shares rapidly after an initial public offering and benefit from high market prices. As
concerns the company and its two executive officers in particular, the amended complaint alleges
that (i) the companys registration statement was materially false and misleading because it
failed to disclose the additional commissions and compensation to be received by underwriters;
(ii) the two named executive officers learned of or recklessly disregarded the alleged
misconduct of the underwriters; (iii) the two named executive officers had motive and
opportunity to engage in alleged wrongful conduct due to personal holdings of the companys
stock and the fact that an alleged artificially inflated stock price could be used as currency
for acquisitions; and (iv) the two named executive officers, by virtue of their positions with
the company, controlled the company and the contents of the registration statement and had the
ability to prevent its issuance or cause it to be corrected. The plaintiffs in this suit seek an
unspecified amount for damages suffered.
In July 2002, the issuers filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint and a
decision was rendered on February 19, 2003. Only one of the claims against the company was
dismissed. On October 8, 2002, the claims against its officers were dismissed pursuant to the
terms of Reservation of Rights and Tolling Agreements entered into with the plaintiffs.
In June 2003, a committee of the companys Board of Directors conditionally approved a proposed
settlement between the issuer defendants, the individual defendants, and the plaintiffs. If
approved, the settlement would provide, among other things, a release of the company and of the
individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the amended
complaint. The company would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the settlement,
including agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims the company
may have against its underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is
expected to be borne by the companys insurance carriers.
On June 25, 2004, the Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court
granted the preliminary approval motion on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications.
On August 31, 2005, the court issued a preliminary order further approving the modifications to
the settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The court also appointed the Notice
Administrator for the settlement and ordered that notice of the settlement be distributed to all
settlement class members beginning on November 15, 2005. The settlement fairness hearing has
been set for April 24, 2006. Following the hearing, if the court determines that the settlement
is fair to the class members, the settlement will be approved. There can be no assurance that
this proposed settlement would be approved and implemented in its current form, or at all.
Therefore, it is not possible to predict the final
outcome of the case, nor to determine the amount of any possible losses. If the settlement
process fails, the company will continue to defend its position in this litigation that the
claims against it, and its officers, are without merit. Accordingly, no provision for this case
has been made in the interim consolidated financial statements as at February 28, 2006.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
9 Earnings (loss) per share
The following table summarizes the reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares
outstanding and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
Six months |
|
Three months |
|
Six months |
|
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
Basic
weighted
average
number of
shares
outstanding
(000s) |
|
|
68,591 |
|
|
|
68,581 |
|
|
|
68,528 |
|
|
|
68,495 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
stock options
(000s) |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
restricted
share units
(000s) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
effect of
deferred
share units
(000s) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Dilutive
effect of
restricted
stock awards
(000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
weighted
average
number of
shares
outstanding
(000s) |
|
|
69,152 |
|
|
|
69,105 |
|
|
|
68,968 |
|
|
|
68,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
excluded from
the
calculation
of diluted
weighted
average
number of
shares
because their
exercise
price was
greater than
the average
market price
of the common
shares
(000s) |
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted loss per share for the six months ended February 28, 2005, was the same as the
basic loss per share since the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards and
deferred share units should not be included in the calculation; otherwise, the effect would be
anti-dilutive. Accordingly, the diluted loss per share for that period was calculated using the
basic weighted average number of shares outstanding.
10 Segment information
The company is organized under two reportable segments: the Telecom Division and the Life
Sciences and Industrial Division. The Telecom Division offers integrated test solutions to
network service providers, cable operators, system vendors and component manufacturers
throughout the global telecommunications industry. The Life Sciences and Industrial Division
mainly leverages developed and acquired core telecom technologies for high-precision assembly
and research sectors.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
The following tables set out information by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended February 28, 2006 |
|
|
Six months ended February 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
25,254 |
|
|
$ |
4,812 |
|
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
$ |
47,330 |
|
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
|
$ |
57,110 |
|
Earnings from operations |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
2,091 |
|
Unallocated items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended February 28, 2005 |
|
|
Six months ended February 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Division |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
19,469 |
|
|
$ |
3,666 |
|
|
$ |
23,135 |
|
|
$ |
36,900 |
|
|
$ |
7,832 |
|
|
$ |
44,732 |
|
Earnings (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
(757 |
) |
|
$ |
(182 |
) |
|
$ |
(405 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,114 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,519 |
) |
Unallocated items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
Foreign exchange gain
(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for
the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Total assets by reportable segment are detailled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
91,042 |
|
|
$ |
64,655 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
10,122 |
|
|
|
11,449 |
|
Unallocated assets |
|
|
107,586 |
|
|
|
114,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,750 |
|
|
$ |
190,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated assets are comprised of cash, short-term investments and income taxes and tax
credits recoverable.
11 Stock-based compensation
On September 1, 2003, the company adopted the amendment made to the CICA Handbook section 3870,
Stock-Based Compensation and Other Stock-Based Payments. Accordingly, employee stock-based
compensations granted on or after September 1, 2003, were accounted for using a fair value-based
method. However, if the fair value-based method had been applied to employee stock-based
compensations granted prior to September 1, 2003, and outstanding as at February 28, 2005 and
2006, the pro forma net earnings (loss) per share would have been the same as the net earnings
(loss) per share for all reporting periods.
12 Differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP
These interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP
and significant differences in measurement and disclosure from U.S. GAAP are set out in note 21
to the companys most recent annual consolidated financial statements. This note describes
significant changes occurring since the most recent annual consolidated financial statements and
provides a quantitative analysis of all significant differences. All disclosures required in
annual financial statements under U.S. GAAP and Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange
Commission in the United States have not been provided in these interim consolidated financial
statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to conform to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for
the period in accordance with
Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(2,364 |
) |
Unrealized losses on forward
exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the
period in accordance with U.S.
GAAP |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(2,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
7,311 |
|
|
|
(5,167 |
) |
|
|
9,962 |
|
Unrealized gains on forward
exchange contracts |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
Reclassification of gains
on forward exchange
contracts in net earnings |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
|
$ |
10,811 |
|
|
$ |
(5,662 |
) |
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per
share in accordance with U.S.
GAAP |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Diluted net earnings (loss) per
share in accordance with U.S.
GAAP |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Basic weighted average number of
shares outstanding (000s) |
|
|
68,591 |
|
|
|
68,581 |
|
|
|
68,528 |
|
|
|
68,495 |
|
Diluted weighted average number
of shares outstanding (000s) |
|
|
69,152 |
|
|
|
69,105 |
|
|
|
68,968 |
|
|
|
68,978 |
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Reconciliation of shareholders equity to conform to U.S. GAAP
The following summary sets out the significant differences between the companys reported
shareholders equity under Canadian GAAP as compared to U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity in accordance with Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
183,609 |
|
|
$ |
173,400 |
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
4,716 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(11,579 |
) |
|
|
(11,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
176,746 |
|
|
$ |
165,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the shareholders equity activity under U.S. GAAP since
August 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Contributed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation |
|
|
Other |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders' |
|
|
|
capital |
|
|
surplus |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
costs |
|
|
capital |
|
|
income |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Balance as at August
31, 2005 |
|
$ |
597,664 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(467,079 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,715 |
) |
|
$ |
5,094 |
|
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
|
$ |
165,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
Stock-based compensation
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
Unrealized gains on
forward exchange
contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at November
30, 2005 |
|
$ |
597,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(466,724 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,435 |
) |
|
$ |
5,062 |
|
|
$ |
33,504 |
|
|
$ |
169,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for the
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Stock-based compensation
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
Unrealized gains on
forward exchange
contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at February
28, 2006 |
|
$ |
597,820 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
(465,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,173 |
) |
|
$ |
5,036 |
|
|
$ |
38,884 |
|
|
$ |
176,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period |
|
$ |
7,311 |
|
|
$ |
15,669 |
|
Cumulative effect of prior periods |
|
|
26,857 |
|
|
|
11,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,168 |
|
|
|
26,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
Cumulative effect of prior periods |
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,716 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,884 |
|
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development tax credits
During the three- and six-month periods ended February 28, 2005 and 2006, net research and
development expenses under Canadian GAAP included tax credits that are refundable against income
taxes payable of $611,000, $1,193,000, $659,000 and $1,195,000, respectively. Under U.S. GAAP,
these credits would have been recorded in the income taxes. This difference had no impact on the
net earnings (loss) and the net earnings (loss) per share figures for the reporting periods
under U.S. GAAP.
Statements of cash flows
For the three- and six-months ended February 28, 2005 and 2006, there were no significant
differences between the statements of cash flows under Canadian GAAP as compared to U.S. GAAP,
except for the subtotal before change in non-cash operating items, whose presentation is not
permitted under U.S. GAAP.
New accounting standards and pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The
amendments made by SFAS 151 improves financial reporting by clarifying that any abnormal amount
of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be
recognized as current-period charges and by requiring the allocation of fixed production
overheads to inventory, based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This SFAS is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The
company adopted this new statement on September 1, 2005, and its adoption had no impact on its
financial statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payments. This statement supersedes
APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related implementation guidance, and
revises SFAS 123 in a number of areas. Under SFAS 123(R), all forms of share-based payment to
employees result in compensation costs recognized in the financial statements. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The company adopted this statement on
September 1, 2005 using the modified prospective application method of transition and its
adoption had no significant impact on its financial statements.
Under U.S. GAAP, until August 31, 2003, the company elected to measure compensation costs
related to the granting of stock options and stock awards using the intrinsic value method of
accounting. In this instance, however, under SFAS 123(R), the company is required to make pro
forma disclosures of net earnings and net earnings per share for any periods included in the
financial statements that ended prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), as if the fair value-based
method of accounting had been applied to outstanding unvested awards granted prior to September
1, 2003. Consequently, if the fair value-based method had been applied to these awards, the pro
forma net earnings (loss) per share would have been the same as the net earnings (loss) per
share for all reporting periods.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This statement replaces APB Opinion
No. 20, Accounting Changes", and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements", and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a
change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting
principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual
instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. In general,
this statement requires a company to account for the adoption of a new accounting policy by
applying the new principle to prior accounting periods as if that principle had always been
adopted. This statement is effective for accounting changes or error corrections in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and we intend that such forward- looking
statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Forward-looking statements are
statements other than historical information or statements of current condition. Words such as
may, will, expect, believe, anticipate, intend, could, estimate, continue or the
negative or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of
future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. They are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements due to various factors, including consolidation in the global
telecommunications test and measurement industry; capital spending levels in the
telecommunications, life sciences and high-precision assembly sectors; concentration of sales;
fluctuating exchange rates and our ability to execute in these uncertain conditions; the effects of
the additional actions we have taken in response to such economic uncertainty (including workforce
reductions, ability to quickly adapt cost structures with anticipated levels of business, ability
to manage inventory levels with market demand); market acceptance of our new products and other
upcoming products; limited visibility with regards to customer orders and the timing of such
orders; our ability to successfully integrate our acquired and to-be-acquired businesses; the
retention of key technical and management personnel; and future economic, competitive and market
conditions. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments and risks, all of which are
difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Other risk
factors that may affect our future performance and operations are detailed in our Annual Report on
Form 20-F and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian
securities commission. We believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are reasonable based on information currently available to us, but we cannot assure you that the
expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as at the date of this document. We
undertake no obligation to revise or update any of them to reflect events or circumstances that
occur after the date of this document.
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
dated April 4, 2006.
All dollar amounts are expressed in US dollars, except as otherwise noted.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Leading telecom operators (telcos) in North America continued fiber deployments in their
access networks to expand bandwith of their access networks to fulfill increasing customer
expectations and to fight a triple-play battle (even quadruple-play with wireless telephony)
against cable TV operators (cablecos) to offer consumers bundled voice, data and video services.
This broadband race between telcos and cablecos to offer the full suite of services and expand
revenues is expected to increase wireline capital expenditures in calendar 2006 and for a few years
to come, especially in the United States.
1
Leading US telcos, along with a number of Tier-II and Tier-III players, opted for an
assortment of deployment strategies, including fiber-to-the-node (FTTN), fiber-to-the-curb (FTTC),
fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) or its equivalent fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP), depending on their
estimates of how much bandwidth will be required to meet the challenge from the cablecos. These
deployments, which fall under the generic FTTx name, are not as prevalent in Europe and Asia.
However, FTTx is gaining momentum in these regions as test trials are currently underway as a means
to increase revenues by delivering video services to undercut competitors. Note that Japan and
Korea already have FTTx deployment programs well underway.
Against this backdrop, there has been consolidation among telecom operators in the US during
the past year. Verizon acquired MCI, while SBC Communications merged with AT&T. The latter
combination most recently announced a potential merger with BellSouth. These transactions, which
have reduced the number of telcos in the competitive landscape, will likely increase competition
among various suppliers. Similarly, large system vendors like Alcatel and Lucent are considering
merging in order to gain size and enhance their position and value proposition to the increasing
large network operators.
On a global basis, as the demand for broadband services increases, voice, data and video are
becoming mere applications on converged, IP-based networks. Telcos around the world are migrating
from public switched telephone networks (PSTN) to packet-based, IP networks in order to achieve
substantial reductions in operating expenses and increased profitability.
Legacy SONET/SDH networks were designed in the late 1970s to carry voice traffic. Their
efficiency, however, can often times drop to as low as 30% when combining voice, data and video
services. Next-generation networks represent a major technological improvement, since they can
deliver triple-play services at near 100% efficiency, regardless of the payload content, while
significantly reducing the cost of operating and maintaining networks.
These key market trends continued to affect multiple segments of the global telecommunications
supply chain in 2005 and in the first months of calendar 2006. System manufacturers benefited from
orders by both telcos and cablecos for next-generation, converged IP networks as well as from major
investments by telcos in access networks. Component vendors saw increased demand for optical
components that support FTTx and IP-based systems. Some test and measurement equipment vendors
attracted the attention of telcos, cablecos, system manufacturers and component vendors, especially
ones offering test solutions for IP optical networking and/or FTTx applications.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We reported sales of $30.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, which represented a
growth of 30.0% year-over-year. It also marked our 10th consecutive reporting period
with revenue growth and our highest sales level since the fourth quarter of 2001. Also, we reduced
sales concentration, with our top customer accounting for 8.5% of our sales in the second quarter
of fiscal 2006, compared to 21.4% for the corresponding period last year.
Looking at the bottom line, we were profitable on a GAAP basis for a fifth consecutive quarter
with $1.4 million in net earnings, or $0.02 per diluted share, compared to break-even in the second
quarter of 2005. Net earnings per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 included charges of
$0.02 per diluted share for amortization of intangible assets and stock-
2
based compensation costs. We also generated cash flows from operating activities for a ninth
consecutive reporting period with $5.4 million in the second quarter of 2006.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we announced and subsequently completed the
acquisition of substantially all the assets of Consultronics Limited. Based in Toronto, Canada, and
with operations in Southampton, UK and Budapest, Hungary, Consultronics Limited is a leading
supplier of test equipment for copper-based broadband access networks ranking among the top three
vendors in handheld x-Digital Subscriber Line (xDSL) testing, with a global market share of 13.4%,
according to an industry report from Frost & Sullivan. The company also boasts a rich product
portfolio for testing next-generation technologies, such as IPTV (Internet Protocol TV) and VoIP
(Voice-over-Internet Protocol), which are critical for network service providers in their
deployment of triple-play services (voice, data, video) over optical and copper links in access
networks. Other test solutions offered by Consultronics include network monitoring probes for VoIP
and legacy telephone networks, Gigabit Ethernet Analyzers for remote testing applications, as well
as protocol and physical characterization instruments for local copper loops (copper access
networks). This acquisition is a strategic initiative to position EXFO as a genuine one-stop shop
for broadband access and triple-play testing, since it greatly complements our market leadership in
the FTTx market.
This acquisition has been settled for a total cash consideration valued at $19.3 million, or
$19.0 million net of cash acquired. Total consideration includes acquisition-related costs of $1.2
million and the assumption of a long-term debt of $0.7 million. Our preliminary estimate of the
fair value of acquired intangible assets amounts to $8.7 million. These intangible assets, namely
core technology, will be amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of
five years. Consultronics, which has been integrated into EXFOs Telecom Division, contributed
about one month to our consolidated financial results in the second quarter.
Also, during the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Deutsche Telecom AG selected us as sole-source
supplier for all their fiber deployment test applications including FTTx. Consequently, during
the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we shipped several orders to this Tier-I European customer.
We launched seven new products during the second quarter including the two-slot FTB-200
Compact Platform for multi-layer and multi-medium testing; the handheld AXS-100 OTDR for FTTx test
applications; legacy SONET/SDH test modules reaching transmission rates up to 10 Gb/s for the
FTB-200 Compact Platform; as well as next-generation and legacy SONET/SDH test modules reaching 10
Gb/s for the FTB-400 field-test and IQS-500 R&D/manufacturing platforms.
Subsequent to the quarter-end, we released our new GPON/EPON power meter for service
activation and troubleshooting of FTTx networks. Altogether, EXFO has introduced 12 new test
solutions so far this fiscal year.
OUR STRATEGY, KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND CAPABILITY TO DELIVER RESULTS
For a complete description of our strategy, the related key performance indicators (KPIs), as
established at the beginning of fiscal 2006, as well as our capability to deliver results, please
refer to the corresponding sections in our most recent Annual Report, filed with the securities
commissions.
3
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, considering our strong sales and booking levels at
mid-point of fiscal 2006, as well as the expected impact of the acquisition of Consultronics on our
future sales, we have raised our growth metric to 25% year-over-year. The former KPI was 15% sales
growth year-over-year. Also, despite the additional charge for the amortization of acquired
intangible assets of approximately $1.0 million following the acquisition of Consultronics, we
maintained our profitability metric to reach 5% of earnings from operations in fiscal 2006.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
For a complete description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to
the corresponding section in our most recent Annual Report, filed with the securities commissions.
The following details the changes in critical accounting policies that will be adopted in fiscal
2007.
|
|
|
In January 2005, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants issued four new
accounting standards in relation to financial instruments: Section 3855, Financial
Instruments Recognition and Measurement, Section 3865, Hedges, Section 1530,
Comprehensive Income and Section 3251, Equity. These new standards apply to fiscal
years beginning on or after October 1, 2006, and we will adopt them on September 1,
2007. |
Please refer to note 2 to our interim consolidated financial statements for further
information about these new standards and their impact on our financial statements.
4
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations for the periods ended February 28, 2005 and 2006, should be read in conjunction with our
interim consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto. Our interim consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (Canadian GAAP) and significant differences in measurement and disclosure from the
United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) are set out in note 12 to our
interim consolidated financial statements. Our measurement currency is the Canadian dollar although
we report our financial statements in US dollars. The following table sets forth interim
consolidated statements of earnings data in thousands of US dollars, except per share data, and as
a percentage of sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
$ |
23,135 |
|
|
$ |
57,110 |
|
|
$ |
44,732 |
|
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
13,440 |
|
|
|
10,431 |
|
|
|
25,504 |
|
|
|
20,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
16,626 |
|
|
|
12,704 |
|
|
|
31,606 |
|
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
7,728 |
|
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
Net research and development |
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
Amortization of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
15,218 |
|
|
|
12,886 |
|
|
|
29,515 |
|
|
|
25,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
|
$ |
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
25,254 |
|
|
$ |
19,469 |
|
|
$ |
47,330 |
|
|
$ |
36,900 |
|
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
9,780 |
|
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
$ |
23,135 |
|
|
$ |
57,110 |
|
|
$ |
44,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
(405 |
) |
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
(182 |
) |
|
$ |
2,091 |
|
|
$ |
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross research and development |
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
3,820 |
|
|
$ |
8,946 |
|
|
$ |
7,619 |
|
Net research and development |
|
$ |
3,906 |
|
|
$ |
2,781 |
|
|
$ |
7,028 |
|
|
$ |
5,561 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown separately. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Net research and development |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Amortization of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
82.9 |
% |
|
|
82.5 |
% |
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Division |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
Life Sciences and Industrial Division |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross research and development |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Net research and development |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown separately. |
6
SALES
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, our global sales increased 30.0% to $30.1
million from $23.1 million for the same period last year, with an 84%-16% split in favor of our
Telecom Division. Newly acquired Consultronics contributed about one month to our sales in the
second quarter of fiscal 2006.
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, our global sales increased 27.7% to $57.1 million
from $44.7 million for the same period last year, with an 83%-17% split in favor of our Telecom
Division.
Overall, for the two divisions, accepted orders increased 13.7% to $28.3 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 from $24.9 million for the same period last year. Our book-to-bill ratio
decreased to 0.94 in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, from 1.07 for the same period last year. In
the previous quarter, the net book-to-bill ratio reached 1.13. Also, our second quarter (December
to February) is usually affected by seasonality as network operators are transiting fiscal years
with associated budget transition. Our increase of 13.7% in accepted orders in the second quarter
of fiscal 2006, compared to the same period last year reflects what we believe to be an increased
demand for our test solutions (especially in the Europe-Middle East-Africa (EMEA) and in
Asia-Pacific (APAC) regions), market-share gains in the telecommunications and life sciences
markets as well as the improvement in the telecommunications market environment.
Telecom Division
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, sales of our Telecom Division increased 29.7% to
$25.3 million from $19.5 million for the same period last year.
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, sales of our Telecom Division increased 28.3% to
$47.3 million from $36.9 million for the same period last year.
For the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2006, we benefited from our continued
portfolio of new products and an increased demand for our test solutions in EMEA and APAC, compared
to 2005, as we are expanding our customer base in these areas. In addition, the positive spending
environment, as well as the market share we believe we gained so far in fiscal 2006 for our optical
products, helped us increase our sales year-over-year. Also, during the second quarter of fiscal
2006, we shipped several orders to Deutsche Telekom AG for their fiber deployment test applications
including FTTx. These sales were included in EMEA. Furthermore, Consultronics, which has been
integrated into EXFOs Telecom Division, contributed about one month to our consolidated sales in
the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The results of Consultronics have been included in our
consolidated statement of earnings since January 26, 2006; i.e. the acquisition date. Finally,
during the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2006, our top customer accounted for 10.2%
and 13.0% of our telecom sales, respectively, compared to 25.4% and 28.0% for the corresponding
periods last year, reflecting the diversification of our customer base. In fact, excluding sales to
our top customer, our sales would have increased 56% and 55% for the second quarter and the first
half of fiscal 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods last year.
Over the last quarters, our penetration of the protocol test market has been modest as we
refocused our efforts onto next-generation solutions, which are at the basis of the whole trend
toward IP convergence. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we reached a key milestone for our
protocol product development program with the availability of our legacy
7
SONET/SDH test solutions up to 10 Gb/s for our FTB-200 as well as our next-generation and legacy
solutions for our FTB-400 and IQS-500 platforms. These latest product launches, combined with our
existing offering for Ethernet testing (from 10 Mb/s up to 10 Gb/s), 1 Gb/s Fibre Channel and
TCP/IP test solutions, provide us with an extensive product portfolio to compete against the
incumbent players in protocol testing, especially in the network service provider (NSP)market
segment, but also to a lesser degree, with system vendors. Among many key differentiators, we
believe EXFO now offers the most advanced complete and compact test solutions combining
next-generation SONET/SDH and Ethernet test modules at rates up to 10 Gb/s in the same portable
platform with our FTB-400 and GP-404 module receptacle. Based on these data points, we continue to
believe that we should witness an increase in protocol test revenues in the second half of fiscal
2006 and that our protocol test revenues should equal our optical test revenues on a medium- to
long-term basis.
Life Sciences and Industrial Division
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, sales of our Life Sciences and Industrial
Division increased 31.3% to $4.8 million from $3.7 million for the same period last year.
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, sales of our Life Sciences and Industrial Division
increased 24.9% to $9.8 million from $7.8 million for the same period last year.
The increase in sales in fiscal 2006, compared to 2005, is mainly due to increased sales
activities in the curing market as well as market-share gains in the fluorescence illumination
market.
Geographic distribution
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, sales to the Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa
(EMEA) and Asia-Pacific (APAC) accounted for 57%, 26% and 17% of global sales, respectively. For
the corresponding period last year, sales to the Americas, EMEA and APAC accounted for 65%, 20% and
15% of global sales, respectively. For the six months ended February 28, 2006, sales to the
Americas, EMEA and APAC accounted for 58%, 26% and 16% of global sales, respectively. For the
corresponding period last year, sales to the Americas, EMEA and APAC accounted for 68%, 19% and 13%
of global sales, respectively.
Our sales to the Americas increased year-over-year in dollars mainly because we had large
sales volumes in Latin America. However, sales to our top customer, who is located in the United
States, were unusually high in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2005. For fiscal
2006, we expect sales to this customer to be lower than in 2005 as a result of its effort to reduce
its cost base by migrating to less expensive test solutions and methods. EXFO remains the main
supplier of optical test solutions to this customer and we have achieved new products
standardizations with this account during the last quarter. Excluding sales to this customer, our
sales to the Americas would have increased 45.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 and 36.0% for
the first half of 2006, compared to the corresponding periods last year.
Following our efforts to develop the EMEA market in the last several quarters, our sales to in
this territory increased more significantly year-over-year, mainly due to improved market
penetration by both divisions. Namely, during the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we recorded sales
with Deutsche Telekom, further increasing our sales to this market year-over-year.
Our sales to the APAC market also improved significantly year-over-year. Over the last several
quarters, we strengthened our product offering, specifically targeting the requirements of
8
this market and expanding our sales and marketing activities in this region. Our increased
focus and interaction with this market, combined with our enhanced capability to win tenders, which
may vary in number and importance, contributed to our growth in the APAC region.
Through our two divisions, we sell our products to a broad range of customers, including NSPs,
cable TV operators, optical system and component manufacturers, as well as customers in the life
sciences and high-precision assembly sectors. During the three months ended February 28, 2006, no
customer accounted for more than 10% of our total sales, and our top three customers accounted for
20.3% of our total sales. For the corresponding period last year, we had a high amount of sales to
a single customer that accounted for 21.4% of our total sales, and our top three customers
accounted for 27.8% of our sales. For the six months ended February 28, 2006, we had one customer
that accounted for 10.7% of our total sales, and our top three customers accounted for 19.8% of our
total sales. For the corresponding period last year, we had one customer that accounted for 23.1%
of our total sales, and our top three customers accounted for 27.9% of our total sales. Our
significant sales increase, despite the fact that our revenue from our top customer was
significantly reduced is a good sign that we have continued to strengthen our market acceptance,
diversify our customer base and reduce our sales concentration with a single customer. This also
indicates that our 2nd and 3rd most important customers, which may vary from
quarter to quarter, have gained in importance as we continue our diversification efforts.
GROSS MARGIN
Gross margin amounted to 55.3% of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2006, compared
to 54.9% for the same period last year.
Gross margin amounted to 55.3% of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2006, compared
to 53.8% for the same period last year.
The increase in our gross margin can be explained by the following factors. First, we were
able to reduce our cost of goods sold by better leveraging our supplier base. Second, we succeeded
in increasing the market acceptance of our new products (designed in the last few years) on which
we had started to focus our R&D efforts to simultaneously create lower cost of goods and most
advanced solutions. Also, the significant rise in sales year-over-year resulted in an increase in
manufacturing activities, allowing us to better absorb our fixed manufacturing costs. Furthermore,
streamlined operations following our consolidation action in fiscal 2005 and continued
cost-reduction programs allowed us to further improve our gross margin. However, the shift in the
geographic distribution of our sales resulted in more sales made to the EMEA and APAC markets,
where gross margins tend to be lower as most of our sales to these markets are made through
distribution channels. In addition, we are facing aggressive pricing pressure worldwide. Finally, a
stronger Canadian dollar, compared to the US dollar, prevented us from further improving our gross
margin as some cost of sales items are denominated in Canadian dollars.
Considering the expected sales growth in fiscal 2006, the effect of our recent
consolidation actions, the cost-effective design of our products, the increase in sales of protocol
products (which tend to generate higher margins), our tight control on operating costs as well as
the expected contribution from Consultronics, whose products have slightly higher margin than our
existing ones, we expect our gross margin to improve in 2006. However, our gross margin may
fluctuate quarter-over-quarter as our sales may fluctuate. Furthermore, our gross margin can be
negatively affected by increased competitive pricing pressure, customer concentration
9
and/or consolidation, increased obsolescence costs, shifts in customer and product mix,
under-absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and increases in product offerings by other suppliers
in our industry. Finally, any further increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar would have a
negative impact on our gross margin in fiscal 2006.
SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, selling and administrative expenses were $9.3
million, or 30.9% of sales, compared to $7.7 million, or 33.4% of sales for the same period last
year.
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, selling and administrative expenses were $18.4
million, or 32.2% of sales, compared to $15.1 million, or 33.8% of sales for the same period last
year.
The increase in our selling and administrative expenses in dollars year-over-year is mainly
due to our decision to increase our sales activities to better leverage the significant research
and development investments of the prior years, which resulted in higher sales and marketing
expenditures (including number of employees). In addition, our commission expenses increased
year-over-year due to the increase in sales. Furthermore, a stronger Canadian dollar, compared to
the US dollar year-over-year, caused our selling and administrative expenses to increase, as more
than half of these are incurred in Canadian dollars. Also, stock-based compensation costs were
higher in the second and the first half of fiscal 2006, compared to the corresponding periods last
year, increasing our selling and administrative expenses year-over-year. In addition, costs to
comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 further increased our selling and
administrative expenses year-over-year. Finally, Consultronics contributed about one month to our
selling and administrative expenses in fiscal 2006, increasing these expenses year-over-year.
However, we were able to mitigate the increase in our selling and administrative expenses as well
as reduce these expenses in percentage of sales year-over-year due to tight cost-control measures
and the consolidation of our Life Sciences and Industrial Division. In addition, our significant
increase in revenues allowed us to reduce our selling and administrative expenses on a percentage
basis.
For the upcoming quarters, we expect our selling and administrative expenses to increase in
dollars, while remaining relatively stable as a percentage of sales. In particular, we will have
the full impact of the acquisition of Consultronics on our selling and administrative expenses.
Also, we expect our commission expenses to increase as sales volume increases. Furthermore,
considering our goal of becoming the leading player in the telecom test and measurement space, we
will intensify our sales and marketing efforts, both domestic and international, which will also
cause our expenses to rise. Finally, any further increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar
would also cause our selling and administrative expenses to increase, as more than half of these
expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, gross research and development expenses totaled
$4.9 million, or 16.4% of sales, compared to $3.8 million, or 16.5% of sales for the same period
last year.
10
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, gross research and development expenses totaled
$8.9 million, or 15.7% of sales, compared to $7.6 million, or 17.0% of sales for the same period
last year.
The increase in our gross research and development expenses in dollars is due to the following
reasons. First, mix and timing of R&D projects in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal
2006 resulted in more gross research and development expenses during these periods compared to the
corresponding periods last year. In addition, Consultronics contributed about one month to our
research and development expenses in fiscal 2006, causing these expenses to increase
year-over-year. Finally, most of our gross research and development expenses were incurred in
Canadian dollars as we have consolidated most of our R&D activities in Canada. Consequently, the
increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar year-over-year caused our
gross research and development expenses to increase.
The decrease in gross research and development expenses as a percentage of sales is directly
related to the significant increase in sales year-over-year.
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, tax credits and grants from the Canadian federal
and provincial governments for research and development activities were $1.0 million, or 20.9% of
gross research and development expenses, compared to $1.0 million, or 27.2% of gross research and
development expenses for the same period last year. For the six months ended February 28, 2006,
these tax credits and grants were $1.9 million, or 21.4% of gross research and development
expenses, compared to $2.1 million, or 27.0% of gross research and development expenses for the
same period last year.
Despite an increase in our gross research and development expenses year-over-year, our tax
credits and grants were relatively flat in dollars and were lower as a percentage of gross research
and development expenses in the second quarter and in the first half of fiscal 2006, compared to
the same periods last year. Also, the mix of our research and development projects resulted in a
lower portion of our expenses being eligible for tax credits in fiscal 2006 compared to 2005.
Nonetheless, we still invested significantly in research and development activities in fiscal
2006 as we firmly believe that innovation and new product introductions are key in gaining market
share in the current economic environment and ensuring the long-term growth and profitability of
EXFO.
For the first half of fiscal 2006, 34.7% of our sales originated from products that have been
on the market for two years or less, which is below our stated goal of 40% for fiscal 2006. With
the help of the 15 new products brought to the market place in fiscal 2005, the 12 new ones
launched so far in fiscal 2006 and the addition of Consultronics products, we remain confident
that we will achieve our goal of 40% for fiscal 2006.
For fiscal 2006, we expect to increase our research and development expenses at the same rate
as we grow our sales, given our focus on innovation, our desire to gain market share and our goal
to exceed customer needs and expectations. Also, any further increase in the strength of the
Canadian dollar would cause our net research and development expenses to increase, as most of these
are incurred in Canadian dollars.
11
AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, amortization of property, plant and equipment
was $873,000, compared to $1.1 million for the same period last year. For the six months ended
February 28, 2006, amortization expenses amounted to $1.8 million, compared to $2.2 million for the
same period last year. The decrease in amortization expenses in fiscal 2006, compared to 2005,
despite the increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar, is mainly
due to the fact that some of our property, plant and equipment became fully amortized during fiscal
2005.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
For the three and the six months ended February 28, 2005, restructuring charges amounted to
$54,000 and $254,000, respectively. Most of these charges were recorded in conjunction with the
consolidation of our Photonics and Life Sciences Division. This consolidation process was completed
during fiscal 2005. Consequently, we had no restructuring charges in fiscal 2006.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, interest and other income amounted to $828,000
compared to $625,000 for the same period last year. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, our
interest income was higher than the corresponding period of 2005, mainly because of the increase in
our average cash position due to cash flows from operating activities and because of the increase
in interest rates.
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, interest and other income amounted to $1.4 million
compared to $1.3 million for the same period last year. The increase in interest income
year-over-year is the result of the increase in our average cash position due to cash flows from
operating activities and the increase in interest rates. However, during the first half of fiscal
2005, we recovered R&D tax credits earned in previous years and we were granted $249,000 in
interest by the tax authorities. Also, during that same period, we recorded $125,000 for the sale
of excess assets. These latter factors offset in part the increase in our interest income
year-over-year.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE GAIN (LOSS)
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, the foreign exchange loss amounted to $213,000,
compared to a foreign exchange gain of $263,000 for the same period last year.
Foreign exchange gains and losses are the result of the translation of operating activities
denominated in currencies other than the Canadian dollar. During the three months ended February
28, 2006, the Canadian dollar value increased compared to the US dollar, resulting in a foreign
exchange loss during that quarter. During the same period last year, the Canadian dollar value
decreased compared to the US dollar, resulting in a foreign exchange gain.
For the six months ended February 28, 2006, the foreign exchange loss amounted to $531,000
compared to $772,000 for the same period last year. The significant exchange losses recorded in the
first half of fiscal 2005 and 2006 are the result of the significant increase in the
12
value of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar during these periods. However, the
increase in the value of the Canadian dollar was more significant in fiscal 2005 compared to 2006,
which resulted in a higher exchange loss in 2005. On the other hand, higher levels of activity in
the first half of fiscal 2006, compared to the same period last year, contributed to the exchange
loss increase in 2006.
It should be noted that foreign exchange rate fluctuations also flow through the P&L line
items as a significant portion of our operating items are denominated in Canadian dollars and we
report our results in US dollars.
We manage our exposure to currency risks with forward exchange contracts. In addition, some of
our Canadian entities operating activities are denominated in US dollars or other currencies,
which further hedges these risks. However, any further increase in the value of the Canadian
dollar, compared to the US dollar, would have a negative impact on our operating results.
INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended February 28, 2006, we recorded an income tax expense of $657,000
compared to $697,000 for the same period last year. For the six months ended February 28, 2006, we
recorded an income tax expense of $1.2 million compared to $1.4 million for the same period last
year.
Most of the income tax expense recorded in fiscal 2005 and 2006 represents income taxes
payable at the Canadian federal level, which are reduced by research and development tax credits
that are recorded against gross research and development expenses in the statements of earnings.
We record a full valuation allowance against our future income tax assets because it is more
likely than not that these assets will not be recovered. The valuation allowance will be reversed
once we will have concluded that realization of future income tax assets is more likely than not.
Consequently, our income tax rates are distorted compared to statutory rates.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Requirements and Capital Resources
As at February 28, 2006, cash and short-term investments consisted of $103.8 million, while
our working capital was at $130.3 million. Our cash and short-term investments decreased $10.3
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 mainly due to the $17.5 million cash payment for the
acquisition of Consultronics and the cash payments of $933,000 for the purchase of property, plant
and equipment. However, this decrease was offset in part by cash flows from operating activities of
$5.4 million as well as an unrealized foreign exchange gain of $2.9 million on our cash and
short-term investments. The unrealized foreign exchange gain resulted from the translation, in US
dollars, of our Canadian-dollar-denominated cash and short-term investments and was recorded in the
cumulative translation adjustment in the balance sheet.
Our short-term investments consist of commercial paper or bonds issued by 12 (11 as of
November 30, 2005) high-credit quality corporations and trusts; therefore, we consider the risk of
non-performance of these financial instruments to be remote. For the purposes of managing
13
our cash position, we have established a cash management policy, which we follow and monitor
on a regular basis. These short-term investments will be used for working capital and other general
corporate purposes, including other potential acquisitions.
We believe that our cash and short-term investments, combined with an available line of credit
of $5.0 million, will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital requirements for the
foreseeable future, including the remaining of the purchase price payable for the acqusition of
Consultronics of $1.6 million. However, possible operating losses and/or possible investments in or
acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies may require additional
financing. There can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be available
when required or, if available, that it can be secured on satisfactory terms. Our line of credit
bears interest at prime rate.
Sources and Uses of Cash
We finance our operations and meet our capital expenditure requirements mainly through cash
flows from operating activities, the use of our cash and short-term investments as well as the
issuance of subordinate voting shares.
Upon the acquisition of Consultronics, we also assume capital leases of $533,000 (CA$606,000).
This long-term debt, which bears interest at 5%, matures in 2010.
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $5.4 million for the three months ended
February 28, 2006, compared to $4.2 million for the same period last year. Cash flows provided by
operating activities in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 were mainly attributable to the net
earnings before items not affecting cash of $3.9 million and the positive net change in non-cash
operating items of $1.5 million. During the second quarter of 2006, our accounts receivable
decreased resulting in a positive effect on cash flows of $4.1 million while our income taxes and
tax credits recoverable and inventories increased, resulting in negative effects on cash flows of
$461,000 and $1.8 million, respectively.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $6.3 million for the six months ended
February 28, 2006, compared to $4.6 million for the same period last year. Cash flows provided by
operating activities in the first half of fiscal 2006 were mainly attributable to the net earnings
before items not affecting cash of $7.1 million and the negative net change in non-cash operating
items of $786,000. During the first half of fiscal 2006, our accounts receivable decreased and our
accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased resulting in positive effects on cash flows of
$927,000 and $2.0 million respectively. On the other hand, our income taxes and tax credits
recoverable and our inventories increased, resulting in negative effects on cash flows of $749,000
and $2.9 million, respectively.
Despite the sequential increase in sales for both the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2006, our accounts receivable decreased due to the timing of our sales within these periods.
Our income taxes and tax credits recoverable increased for both the second quarter and the first
half of fiscal 2006 due to research and development tax credits earned during the quarter but not
yet recovered. Our inventories increased for both the second quarter and the first half of 2006 in
order to sustain our increased sales activities. Finally, our accounts payable and accrued
liabilities increased in the first half of 2006 due to increased level of activities.
14
Investing Activities
Cash flows used by investing activities were $9.6 million for the three months ended February
28, 2006, compared to $4.9 million for the same period last year. In the second quarter of fiscal
2006, we made cash payments of $17.5 million and $933,000 for the acquisition of Consultronics and
the purchase of property, plant and equipment, respectively. In order to finance a portion of these
payments, we disposed of $8.8 million worth of short-term investments during the second quarter of
fiscal 2006. For the corresponding period last year, we acquired $4.6 million worth of short-term
investments with cash flows from operating activities and paid $246,000 for the purchase of
property, plant and equipment.
Cash flows used by investing activities were $9.2 million for the six months ended February
28, 2006, compared to $6.2 million for the same period last year. Similar reasons as those
described above for the second quarter of 2006 can explain the use of cash by investing activities
during the first half of fiscal 2006. For the corresponding period last year, we acquired $5.4
million worth of short-term investments with cash flows from operating activities and paid $823,000
for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.
FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
We utilize forward exchange contracts to manage our foreign currency exposure. Our policy is
not to utilize those derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Our forward exchange contracts, which are used to hedge anticipated US-dollar-denominated
sales, qualify for hedge accounting; therefore, foreign exchange translation gains and losses on
these contracts are recognized as an adjustment of the revenues when the corresponding sales are
recorded.
As at February 28, 2006, we held forward exchange contracts to sell US dollars at various
forward rates, which are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
Expiry dates: |
|
amounts |
|
|
contractual forward rates |
|
March 2006 to August 2006 |
|
$ |
18,200,000 |
|
|
|
1.2327 |
|
September 2006 to December 2008 |
|
|
33,600,000 |
|
|
|
1.1814 |
|
As at February 28, 2006, the fair value of our forward exchange contracts, which represents
the difference between their contractual amounts and their current trading value, amounted to an
unrecognized gain of $4.7 million ($3.6 million as at November 30, 2005).
CONTINGENCY
As discussed in note 8 to our interim consolidated financial statements, EXFO was named as a
defendant in a U.S. securities class action related to its initial public offering (IPO) in June
2000. The complaints allege that the prospectus and the registration statement for the IPO failed
to disclose that the underwriters allegedly received excessive commissions and that the
underwriters and some investors collaborated in order to inflate the price of EXFOs stock in the
after-market.
15
In June 2003, a committee of the EXFOs Board of Directors conditionally approved a proposed
settlement between the issuer defendants, the individual defendants, and the plaintiffs. If
approved, the settlement would provide, among other things, a release of the EXFO and of the
individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the amended
complaint. EXFO would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the settlement, including
agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims EXFO may have against its
underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by
EXFOs insurance carriers.
On June 25, 2004, the Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court
granted the preliminary approval motion on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications. On
August 31, 2005, the court issued a preliminary order further approving the modifications to the
settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The court also appointed the Notice
Administrator for the settlement and ordered that notice of the settlement be distributed to all
settlement class members beginning on November 15, 2005. The settlement fairness hearing has been
set for April 24, 2006. Following the hearing, if the court determines that the settlement is fair
to the class members, the settlement will be approved. There can be no assurance that this proposed
settlement would be approved and implemented in its current form, or at all. Therefore, it is not
possible to predict the final outcome of the case, nor to determine the amount of any possible
losses. If the settlement process fails, EXFO will continue to defend its position in this
litigation that the claims against it, and its officers, are without merit. Accordingly, no
provision for this case has been made in the interim consolidated financial statements as at
February 28, 2006.
SHARE CAPITAL AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Share capital
As at April 4, 2006, EXFO had 37,900,000 multiple voting shares outstanding, entitling to 10
votes each and 30,761,973 subordinate voting shares outstanding. The multiple voting shares and the
subordinate voting shares are unlimited as to number and without par value.
Long-Term Incentive Plan and Deferred Share Unit Plan
The aggregate number of subordinate voting shares covered by stock options, restricted share
units (RSUs) and deferred share units (DSUs) granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the
Deferred Share Unit Plan was 3,039,681 as at February 28, 2006. The maximum number of subordinate
voting shares issuable under these two plans cannot exceed 6,306,153 shares. The following tables
summarize information about stock options, RSUs and DSUs granted to the members of the Board of
Directors and to Management and Corporate Officers of the company and its subsidiaries as at
February 28, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of issued and |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
Stock Option |
|
Number |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
exercise price |
|
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
(one individual) |
|
|
179,642 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
9.05 |
|
Board of Directors (five individuals) |
|
|
194,375 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
6.23 |
|
Management and Corporate Officers
(nine individuals) |
|
|
355,865 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
13.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729,882 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of issued and |
|
Restricted Share Units |
|
Number |
|
|
outstanding |
|
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
(one individual) |
|
|
34,566 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Management and Corporate Officers
(nine individuals) |
|
|
193,372 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,938 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of issued and |
|
Deferred Share Units |
|
Number |
|
|
outstanding |
|
Board of Directors (five individuals) |
|
|
33,713 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As at February 28, 2006, our off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of letters of guarantee and
forward exchange contracts.
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
As of February 28, 2006, we did not have interests in any variable interest entities.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Over the past few years, we have managed our business in a difficult environment; focused on
research and development programs for new and innovative products aimed at expected growth pockets
in our sector; continued the development of our domestic and international markets; and made
strategic acquisitions. However, we operate in a highly competitive sector that is in constant
evolution and, as a result, we encounter various risks and uncertainties that must be given
appropriate consideration in our strategic management policies.
We are exposed to currency risks due to the export of our Canadian-manufactured products, the
large majority of which are denominated in US dollars. These risks are partially hedged by
operating expenses denominated in US dollars, the purchase of raw materials in US dollars and
forward exchange contracts. The increased strength of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US
dollar, over the last two years caused our operating expenses, as well as our foreign exchange
loss, to increase. Any further increase in the value of the Canadian dollar in the coming months
would negatively affect our results of operations.
Secondly, during the last few quarters, we experienced unusual sales concentration with a
U.S.-based Tier-1 telecom carrier. Although we believe this sales concentration is largely due to
our leadership position in the FTTx test market, orders from this customer can fluctuate in
upcoming quarters, depending on the carriers deployment needs, products requirements and schedule.
17
In addition, risks and uncertainties related to the telecommunications test and measurement
industry involve the rapid development of new products that may have short life cycles and require
extensive research and development; the difficulty of adequately predicting market size and trends;
the difficulty of retaining highly skilled employees; and the ability to quickly adapt our cost
structure to changing market conditions in order to achieve profitability.
Furthermore, given our strategic goals for growth and competitive positioning in our industry,
we are continuously expanding into international markets. This exposes us to certain risks and
uncertainties related to changes in local laws and regulations, multiple technological standards,
protective legislation and pricing pressure.
Also, while strategic acquisitions, like those we have made in the past, the recent
acquisition of Consultronics and possibly others in the future, are essential to our long-term
growth, they also expose us to certain risks and uncertainties related to the rapid and effective
integration of these businesses as well as their products, technologies and personnel. Finally,
integration requires the dedication of management resources, which may detract their attention from
our day-to-day business and operations.
The economic environment of our industry could also result in some of our customers
experiencing difficulties and, consequently, this could have a negative effect on our results
especially in terms of future sales and recoverability of accounts receivable. However, the
sectorial and geographic diversity of our customer base provides us with a reasonable level of
protection in this area. Finally, other financial instruments, which potentially subject us to
credit risks, consist mainly of cash, short-term investments and forward exchange contracts. Our
short-term investments consist of debt instruments issued by 12 high-credit quality corporations
and trusts. Our cash and forward exchange contracts are held with or issued by high-credit quality
financial institutions; therefore, we consider the risk of non-performance on these instruments to
be remote.
For a more complete understanding of risk factors that may affect us, please refer to the risk
factors set forth in our disclosure documents published with securities commissions at
www.sedar.com in Canada or www.edgar.com in the U.S.
18