Alliance California Municipal Income Fund, Inc.

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM N-CSR

 

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: 811-10575

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

 

1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

 

 

Joseph J. Mantineo

AllianceBernstein L.P.

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 221-5672

Date of fiscal year end: October 31, 2016

Date of reporting period: April 30, 2016

 

 

 


ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.


APR    04.30.16

LOGO

 

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA
MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

(NYSE: AKP)

 


 

Investment Products Offered

 

• Are Not FDIC Insured

• May Lose Value

• Are Not Bank Guaranteed

You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge. Simply visit AB’s website at www.abglobal.com, or go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or call AB at (800) 227-4618.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AB family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the Adviser of the funds.

The [A/B] logo is a registered service mark of AllianceBernstein and AllianceBernstein® is a registered service mark used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.


June 24, 2016

 

Semi-Annual Report

This report provides management’s discussion of fund performance for Alliance California Municipal Income Fund (the “Fund”) for the semi-annual reporting period ended April 30, 2016. The Fund is a closed-end fund and its shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

Investment Objectives and Policies

This Fund seeks to provide high current income exempt from regular federal and California state income tax by investing substantially all of its net assets in municipal securities that are exempt from state taxes. The Fund will normally invest at least 80%, and normally substantially all, of its net assets in municipal securities paying interest that is exempt from regular federal and California state income tax. In addition, the Fund normally invests at least 75% of its net assets in investment-grade municipal securities or unrated municipal securities considered to be of comparable quality as determined by the Fund’s investment adviser, AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”). The Fund may invest up to 25% of its net assets in municipal securities rated below investment-grade and unrated municipal securities considered to be of comparable quality. The Fund intends to invest primarily in municipal securities that pay interest that is not subject to the federal alternative minimum Tax (“AMT”), but may invest without limit in municipal securities paying interest that is subject to the federal AMT. For more information regarding the Fund’s risks, please see “Disclosures and Risks” on pages 4-5 and “Note G—Risks Involved in Investing in the Fund” of the Notes to Financial Statements on pages 31-34.

Investment Results

The table on page 6 provides performance data for the Fund and its benchmark, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index, for the six- and 12-month periods ended April 30, 2016.

The Fund outperformed its benchmark for the six- and 12-month periods. An underweight in both the state and local general obligation (“GO”) sectors contributed to performance for both periods, relative to the benchmark, as did security selection in the water and special tax sectors. Security selection in the education sector also contributed to performance for the six-month period. For the 12-month period, security selection in the local GO sector contributed to performance, while security selection in the industrial and transportation sectors detracted from performance.

Leverage, achieved through the usage of auction rate preferred shares, tender option bonds (“TOBs”) and variable rate municipal term preferred shares, benefited the Fund’s absolute total return and income over both periods. The Fund used interest rate swaps for hedging purposes over both periods, which had an immaterial impact on performance.

Market Review and Investment Strategy

Intermediate- and long-maturity bonds had strong returns over both periods as falling global commodity prices and slowing economic growth drove yields lower. Shorter-maturity bonds underperformed as the US Federal Reserve increased the Federal Funds rate above its zero target to 0.25% for the first time

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       1   


since 2008. Across fixed-income sectors, municipals had strong performance due primarily to a combination of continued investor demand and limited supply. The total volume of outstanding municipal bonds has declined since 2010, unlike the corporate and Treasury markets which have seen an increase in issuance. In the opinion of the Fund’s Senior Investment Management Team (the “Team”), municipal credit continues to do well, as economic growth and tax receipts are correlated, which has caused tax revenues for state and local governments to hit all-time highs. State and local governments have kept payrolls and expenditures in check as government employment is approximately 500,000 below the peak during the financial crisis. The Team continues to overweight credit (municipal bonds rated A and below) and underweight the longest maturity bonds in the Fund.

California’s fiscal improvement has continued as the state’s economy and tax revenue growth has been sustained, and policymakers have continued to manage state finances prudently. California’s economy, particularly in the Bay Area, is growing more rapidly than the rest of the nation. The state, which faced a $26 billion deficit in January 2010, has since restrained spending and passed a series of tax increases, which together have balanced the state’s budget. The state has also focused on paying down debt and controlling growth of liabilities like pensions. As a result, California’s bond ratings have been rising and the Team believes this will continue during 2016. Over the next 12 months, steady revenue collections, which are historically volatile in California due in part to its highly

progressive income tax, should be a key factor to continued credit improvement. Ongoing fiscal discipline in the budgetary process will also be important, and the Team anticipates that the state may continue to use its robust revenues to pay down debts incurred during previous recessions and to build reserves for the inevitable next recession. While the Team is mindful of California’s history of strained finances, weak governance, and headline risk, the Team also recognizes that the state’s general obligation bonds are constitutionally protected and that debt service is paid second only after education.

The Fund may purchase municipal securities that are insured under policies issued by certain insurance companies. Historically, insured municipal securities typically received a higher credit rating, which meant that the issuer of the securities paid a lower interest rate. As a result of declines in the credit quality and associated downgrades of most fund insurers, insurance has less value than it did in the past. The market now values insured municipal securities primarily based on the credit quality of the issuer of the security with little value given to the insurance feature. In purchasing such insured securities, the Adviser evaluates the risk and return of municipal securities through its own research. If an insurance company’s rating is downgraded or the company becomes insolvent, the prices of municipal securities insured by the insurance company may decline. As of April 30, 2016, the Fund’s percentages of investments in municipal bonds that are insured and in insured municipal bonds that have been pre-refunded or

 

 

2     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND


escrowed to maturity were 7.56% and 0.00%, respectively.

Since February 2008, auctions of the auction rate preferred shares have had fewer buyers than sellers and, as a result, the auctions have “failed”. The failed auctions did not lower the credit quality of the auction rate preferred shares, but rather meant that a holder was unable to sell the auction rate preferred securities in the auctions, so that there was a loss of liquidity for the holders of the auction rate preferred shares. When an auction fails, the auction rate preferred shares pay interest on a formula-based maximum rate based on AA-commercial paper and short-term municipal bond rates. In the extremely low short-term interest rate environment of recent years, the interest rates resulting from such a formula have been much lower than the returns on the Fund’s investments and the cost of alternative forms of leverage available to the Fund. However, to the extent that the cost of this leverage increases in the future and earnings from the Fund’s investments do not increase, the Fund’s net investment returns may decline.

In July 2015, the Fund announced a tender offer of up to 100% of its outstanding auction rate preferred shares at a price equal to 94% of the

liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. The result of accepting tendered shares in September 2015, and replacing the leverage associated with these shares with an alternative form of leverage, was to increase the Fund’s net asset value, but at least in the near term to increase the cost of leverage. Over time, the Team believes diversifying its sources of leverage will lead to lower borrowing costs.

The Team continues to explore, and discuss with the Board of Directors, other liquidity and leverage options, including TOBs, which it has used in the past; this may result in additional auction rate preferred shares being redeemed in the future. The Fund is not required to redeem any auction rate preferred shares, and the Team expects to continue to rely on the auction rate preferred shares for a portion of the Fund’s leverage exposure.

On June 23, 2016, the UK voted to leave the European Union (“EU”) in a popular referendum. At this moment in time, the UK remains a member of the EU and the rules and regulations remain unchanged, as do all the protections in place. Exactly how the UK’s role in the EU will change will become clear over time. The Adviser continues to monitor the heightened market volatility.

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       3   


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund Shareholder Information

Weekly comparative net asset value (“NAV”) and market price information about the Fund is published each Saturday in Barron’s and in other newspapers in a table called “Closed End Funds”. Daily NAVs and market price information, and additional information regarding the Fund, is available at www.abglobal.com and www.nyse.com. For additional shareholder information regarding this Fund, please see page 47.

Benchmark Disclosure

The Barclays Municipal Bond Index is unmanaged and does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a fund portfolio. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index represents the performance of the long-term tax-exempt bond market consisting of investment-grade bonds. An investor cannot invest directly in an index, and its results are not indicative of the performance for any specific investment, including the Fund. In addition, the Index does not reflect the use of leverage, whereas the Fund utilizes leverage.

A Word About Risk

Among the risks of investing in the Fund are changes in the general level of interest rates or changes in bond credit quality ratings. Changes in interest rates have a greater effect on bonds with longer maturities than on those with shorter maturities. Please note, as interest rates rise, existing bond prices fall and can cause the value of your investment in the Fund to decline. While the Fund invests principally in bonds and other fixed-income securities, in order to achieve its investment objectives, the Fund may at times use certain types of investment derivatives, such as options, futures, forwards and swaps. These instruments involve risks different from, and in certain cases, greater than, the risks presented by more traditional investments. At the discretion of the Fund’s Adviser, the Fund may invest up to 25% of its net assets in municipal bonds that are rated below investment grade (i.e., “junk bonds”). These securities involve greater volatility and risk than higher-quality fixed-income securities. The Fund will invest substantially all of its net assets in California municipal bonds and is therefore susceptible to political, economic or regulatory factors specifically affecting California municipal bond issuers.

Leverage Risk: The Fund uses financial leverage for investment purposes, which involves leverage risk. The Fund’s outstanding auction preferred shares and variable rate munifund term preferred shares (together “preferred shares”) result in leverage. The Fund may also use other types of financial leverage, including TOBs, either in combination with, or in lieu of, the preferred shares. The Fund utilizes leverage to seek to enhance the yield and NAV attributable to its Common Stock. These objectives may not be achieved in all interest rate environments. Leverage creates certain risks for holders of Common Stock, including the likelihood of greater volatility of the NAV and market price of the Common Stock. If income from the securities purchased from the funds made available by leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, the Fund’s return will be less than if leverage had not been used. As a result, the amounts available for distribution to Common Stockholders as dividends and other distributions will be reduced. During periods of rising short-term interest rates, the interest paid on the auction rate preferred stock or the floaters issued in connection with the Fund’s TOB transactions would increase. In addition, the interest paid on inverse floaters held by the Fund, whether issued in connection with the Fund’s TOB transactions or purchased in a secondary market transaction, would decrease. Under such circumstances, the Fund’s income and distributions to Common Stockholders may decline, which would adversely affect the Fund’s yield and possibly the market value of its shares. If rising short-term rates coincide with a period of rising long-term rates, the value of the long-term municipal bonds purchased with the proceeds of leverage would decline, adversely affecting the net asset value attributable to the Fund’s Common Stock and possibly the market value of the shares.

Tax Risk: There is no guarantee that all of the Fund’s income will remain exempt from federal or state income taxes. From time to time, the US government and the US

 

(Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance continued on next page)

 

4     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Disclosures and Risks


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

(continued from previous page)

 

Congress consider changes in federal tax law that could limit or eliminate the federal tax exemption for municipal bond income, which would in effect reduce the net income received by shareholders from the Fund by increasing taxes on that income. In such event, the Fund’s NAV could also decline as yields on municipal bonds, which are typically lower than those on taxable bonds, would be expected to increase to approximately the yield of comparable bonds.

Market Risk: The value of the Fund’s assets will fluctuate as the bond market fluctuates. The value of the Fund’s investments may decline, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably, simply because of economic changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.

Credit Risk: An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates will affect the value of investments in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed-income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.

Inflation Risk: This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Fund’s assets can decline as can the value of the Fund’s distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.

Derivatives Risk: Investments in derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Fund, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments.

Duration Risk: Duration is a measure that relates the expected price volatility of a fixed-income security to changes in interest rates. The duration of a fixed-income security may be shorter than or equal to full maturity of a fixed-income security. Fixed-income securities with longer durations have more risk and will decrease in price as interest rates rise. For example, a fixed-income security with a duration of three years will decrease in value by approximately 3% if interest rates increase by 1%.

Liquidity Risk: Liquidity risk occurs when certain investments become difficult to purchase or sell. Difficulty in selling less liquid securities may result in sales at disadvantageous prices affecting the value of your investment in the Fund. Causes of liquidity risk may include low trading volumes and large positions. Municipal securities may have more liquidity risk than other fixed-income securities because they trade less frequently and the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets.

Management Risk: The Fund is subject to management risk because it is an actively managed investment fund. The Adviser will apply its investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions, but there is no guarantee that its techniques will produce the intended results.

These risks are fully discussed in the Fund’s prospectus. As with all investments you may lose money by investing in the Fund.

An Important Note About Historical Performance

The performance on the following page represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. All fees and expenses related to the operation of the Fund have been deducted. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       5   

Disclosures and Risks


HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

 

        
THE FUND VS. ITS BENCHMARK
PERIODS ENDED APRIL 30, 2016 (unaudited)
  Returns      
  6 Months        12 Months       
Alliance California Municipal Income Fund (NAV)     7.28%           12.28%     

 

Barclays Municipal Bond Index     3.55%           5.29%     

 

The Fund’s market price per share on April 30, 2016 was $15.11. The Fund’s NAV price per share on April 30, 2016 was $15.86. For additional Financial Highlights, please see pages 36-38.
        

 

 

 

See Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance on pages 4-5.

 

6     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Historical Performance


PORTFOLIO SUMMARY

April 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

Net Assets ($mil): $135.7

 

 

LOGO

 

*   All data are as of April 30, 2016. The Fund’s quality rating breakdown is expressed as a percentage of the Fund’s total investments in municipal securities and may vary over time. The Fund also enters into derivative transactions, which may be used for hedging or investment purposes (see “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report for additional details). The quality ratings are determined by using the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (“Fitch”). The Fund considers the credit ratings issued by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch and uses the highest rating issued by the agencies. These ratings are a measure of the quality and safety of a bond or portfolio, based on the issuer’s financial condition. AAA is the highest (best) and D is the lowest (worst). If applicable, the pre-refunded category includes bonds which are secured by US government securities and therefore are deemed high-quality investment-grade by the Adviser. If applicable, Not Applicable (N/A) includes non-creditworthy investments; such as, equities, currency contracts, futures and options. If applicable, the Not Rated category includes bonds that are not rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The Adviser evaluates the creditworthiness of non-rated securities based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, cash flows, enterprise value and economic environment.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       7   

Portfolio Summary


PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

April 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

    

Principal

Amount

(000)

    U.S. $ Value  

 

 

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS – 156.2%

    

Long-Term Municipal Bonds – 156.2%

    

California – 142.3%

    

Abag Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps.
(Bijou Woods Associates LP)
Series 2001A
5.30%, 12/01/31

   $ 2,735      $ 2,742,986   

Anaheim Public Financing Authority
(City of Anaheim CA Lease)
Series 2014A
5.00%, 5/01/33-5/01/39

     4,750        5,654,150   

Bay Area Toll Authority
Series 2013S
5.00%, 4/01/33

     5,000        5,910,200   

Beaumont Financing Authority
AMBAC Series 2007C
5.00%, 9/01/26

     755        778,503   

Bellflower Redevelopment Agency
(9920 Flora Vista LP)
Series 2002A
5.50%, 6/01/35

     2,775        2,744,225   

California Econ Recovery
Series 2009A
5.25%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded/ETM)

     535        609,456   

California Health Facilities Financing Authority
(California-Nevada Methodist Homes)
Series 2015
5.00%, 7/01/45

     3,000        3,521,880   

California Municipal Finance Authority
(Azusa Pacific University)
Series 2015B
5.00%, 4/01/35-4/01/41

     2,040        2,274,445   

California Pollution Control Financing Authority
(Poseidon Resources Channelside LP)
Series 2012
5.00%, 7/01/37(a)

     3,450        3,575,511   

California School Finance Authority
(Alliance College-Ready Public Schools Facilities Corp.)
Series 2015A
5.00%, 7/01/30(a)

     1,700        1,859,205   

California School Finance Authority
(Green DOT Public Schools Obligated Group)
Series 2015A
5.00%, 8/01/45(a)

     1,500        1,614,855   

California State Public Works Board
Series 2011G
5.25%, 12/01/26 (Pre-refunded/ETM)

     6,000        7,357,380   

 

8     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Portfolio of Investments


    

Principal

Amount

(000)

    U.S. $ Value  

 

 

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Bentley School)
Series 2010A
7.00%, 7/01/40

   $ 2,625      $ 3,108,893   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Buck Institute for Research on Aging)
AGM Series 2014
5.00%, 11/15/44

     4,000        4,552,960   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Collis P. and Howard Huntington Memorial Hospital Trust)
Series 2014B
5.00%, 7/01/44

     1,000        1,142,190   

City of Los Angeles Department of Airports
(Los Angeles Intl Airport)
Series 2009A
5.25%, 5/15/29

     1,700        1,922,224   

Series 2010A
5.00%, 5/15/27

     1,440        1,667,606   

City of San Francisco CA Public Utilities Commission Wastewater Revenue
Series 2013B
5.00%, 10/01/32

     4,735        5,695,779   

Fullerton Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency
(Marshall B Ketchum University)
AGC Series 2004
5.00%, 4/01/21

     2,050        2,127,367   

Garden Grove Unified School District
Series 2013C
5.00%, 8/01/34

     3,650        4,333,280   

Jurupa Public Financing Authority
Series 2014A
5.00%, 9/01/30-9/01/32

     2,475        2,934,165   

Long Beach Bond Finance Authority
(Aquarium of the Pacific)
Series 2012
5.00%, 11/01/27

     3,500        4,117,190   

Los Angeles Community College District/CA
Series 2008F-1
5.00%, 8/01/28 (Pre-refunded/ETM)

     4,200        4,598,958   

Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency
(Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency Sales Tax)
AMBAC Series 2002A
5.375%, 12/01/26

     6,635        6,655,568   

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       9   

Portfolio of Investments


    

Principal

Amount

(000)

    U.S. $ Value  

 

 

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Sales Tax)
Series 2009
5.00%, 7/01/25

   $ 6,700      $ 7,560,146   

Series 2013B
5.00%, 7/01/33

     1,675        2,022,194   

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Financing Authority
Series 2015A
5.00%, 10/01/33

     1,400        1,682,674   

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power WTR
Series 2013B
5.00%, 7/01/32

     6,185        7,467,027   

Napa Valley Unified School District
Series 2016C
4.00%, 8/01/46

     2,500        2,728,175   

Norco Community Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency
(Norco Redevelopment Agency Project No 1)
Series 2010
5.875%, 3/01/32

     420        492,324   

6.00%, 3/01/36

     325        381,147   

Peralta Community College District
Series 2014A
4.00%, 8/01/31

     4,100        4,504,055   

Port of Los Angeles
Series 2009C
5.00%, 8/01/26

     5,550        6,250,576   

Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency
Series 2010A
5.75%, 9/01/24-9/01/25

     530        614,181   

6.00%, 9/01/30

     370        430,850   

Riverside County Infrastructure Financing Authority
(Riverside County Infrastructure Financing Authority Lease)
Series 2015A
4.00%, 11/01/37

     1,225        1,308,815   

Riverside County Transportation Commission
(Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax)
Series 2013A
5.25%, 6/01/32

     2,000        2,432,700   

Sacramento City Unified School District/CA
Series 2011
5.50%, 7/01/29

     4,000        4,780,280   

 

10     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Portfolio of Investments


    

Principal

Amount

(000)

    U.S. $ Value  

 

 

San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
5.00% SBDTRN, 3/01/32-3/01/34(b)

   $ 6,040      $ 7,205,011   

San Diego County Water Authority Financing Corp.
Series 2013
5.00%, 5/01/31

     4,300        5,200,979   

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority
5.00%, 5/15/36(b)

     5,000        6,122,750   

San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority
(San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority Lease)
Series 2010A
5.10%, 9/01/29

     2,360        2,706,967   

San Diego Unified School District/CA
Series 2013C
5.00%, 7/01/32

     5,125        6,130,474   

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
(San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Sales Tax)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 7/01/36

     3,730        4,403,675   

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Series 2013
5.00%, 3/01/28-3/01/31

     6,070        7,327,441   

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency
Series 2014A
5.00%, 1/15/44

     3,900        4,283,019   

San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority
(San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Lease)
Series 2014
5.00%, 6/15/31

     1,250        1,521,188   

San Mateo Union High School District
Series 2013A
5.00%, 9/01/33

     4,180        4,881,446   

Southern California Public Power Authority
(Los Angeles Department of Water & Power PWR)
Series 2010
5.00%, 7/01/27

     2,525        2,867,390   

State of California
Series 2013
5.00%, 11/01/31

     2,000        2,449,800   

Turlock Irrigation District
Series 2011
5.50%, 1/01/41

     1,200        1,386,468   

University of California
Series 2012G
5.00%, 5/15/31

     8,000        9,522,240   

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       11   

Portfolio of Investments


    

Principal

Amount

(000)

    U.S. $ Value  

 

 

Walnut Energy Center Authority
Series 2014
5.00%, 1/01/33

   $ 2,500      $ 2,960,625   
    

 

 

 
       193,123,593   
    

 

 

 

Florida – 3.2%

    

Florida Higher Educational Facilities Financial Authority
(Nova Southeastern University, Inc.)
Series 2016
5.00%, 4/01/33(c)

     1,000        1,186,910   

Miami Beach Health Facilities Authority
(Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida, Inc.)
Series 2014
5.00%, 11/15/39

     2,750        3,101,643   
    

 

 

 
       4,288,553   
    

 

 

 

Guam – 1.7%

    

Guam Power Authority
Series 2012A
5.00%, 10/01/34

     2,000        2,244,560   
    

 

 

 

Indiana – 0.8%

    

Richmond Hospital Authority
(Reid Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.)
Series 2015
5.00%, 1/01/39

     1,000        1,139,200   
    

 

 

 

Minnesota – 1.0%

    

City of Minneapolis MN
(Fairview Health Services Obligated Group)
Series 2015A
5.00%, 11/15/33

     1,100        1,286,153   
    

 

 

 

Missouri – 0.8%

    

Joplin Industrial Development Authority
(Freeman Health System)
Series 2015
5.00%, 2/15/35

     1,000        1,131,150   
    

 

 

 

Nevada – 1.4%

    

Henderson Local Improvement Districts
AGM Series 2007A
5.00%, 3/01/18

     1,810        1,906,021   
    

 

 

 

New York – 4.2%

    

Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Series 2014C
5.00%, 11/15/32

     4,745        5,707,760   
    

 

 

 

 

12     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Portfolio of Investments


    

Principal

Amount

(000)

    U.S. $ Value  

 

 

Ohio – 0.0%

    

Columbiana County Port Authority
(Apex Environmental LLC)
Series 2004
7.125%, 8/01/25(d)

   $ 500      $ 10,000   

Series 2014
10.635%, 8/01/25(d)

     67        1,346   
    

 

 

 
       11,346   
    

 

 

 

Pennsylvania – 0.8%

    

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing
Authority
(PA Bridges Finco LP)
Series 2015
5.00%, 12/31/38

     1,000        1,122,680   
    

 

 

 

Total Investments – 156.2%
(cost $193,205,959)

       211,961,016   

Other assets less liabilities – (34.2)%

       (46,410,563

Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value – (22.0)%

       (29,875,000
    

 

 

 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders – 100.0%(e)

     $ 135,675,453   
    

 

 

 

INTEREST RATE SWAPS (see Note C)

 

                   Rate Type        

Swap

Counterparty

   Notional
Amount
(000)
     Termination
Date
     Payments
made
by the Fund
    Payments
received
by the
Fund
    Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 

Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.

   $     2,300         10/21/16         SIFMA     4.129   $     43,737   
            

 

 

 

 

*   Variable interest rate based on the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index.

 

(a)   Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities are considered liquid and may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At April 30, 2016, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $7,049,571 or 5.2% of net assets.

 

(b)   Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Fund (see Note I).

 

(c)   When-Issued or delayed delivery security.

 

(d)   Illiquid security.

 

(e)   Portfolio percentages are calculated based on net assets applicable to common shareholders.

As of April 30, 2016, the Fund’s percentages of investments in municipal bonds that are insured and in insured municipal bonds that have been pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity are 7.6% and 0.0%, respectively.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       13   

Portfolio of Investments


 

 

Glossary:

AGC Assured Guaranty Corporation

AGM Assured Guaranty Municipal

AMBAC Ambac Assurance Corporation

ETM Escrowed to Maturity

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

14     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Portfolio of Investments


STATEMENT OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES

April 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Assets   

Investments in securities, at value

  

Unaffiliated issuers (cost $193,205,959)

   $ 211,961,016   

Interest and dividends receivable

     2,857,150   

Deferred offering costs

     225,981   

Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps

     43,737   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     215,087,884   
  

 

 

 
Liabilities   

Due to custodian

     2,932   

Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at liquidation value

     40,125,000   

Payable for floating rate notes issued*

     7,950,000   

Payable for investment securities purchased

     1,183,120   

Advisory fee payable

     113,034   

Interest expense payable

     57,523   

Dividends payable—preferred shares

     3,103   

Other liabilities

     13,980   

Accrued expenses

     88,739   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     49,537,431   
  

 

 

 
Auction Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value   

Auction Preferred shares, $.001 par value per share; 3,240 shares authorized, 1,195 shares issued and outstanding at $25,000 per share liquidation preference

   $ 29,875,000   
  

 

 

 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders

   $ 135,675,453   
  

 

 

 
Composition of Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders   

Common stock, $.001 par value per share; 1,999,996,760 shares authorized, 8,554,668 shares issued and outstanding

   $ 8,555   

Additional paid-in capital

     122,415,038   

Distributions in excess of net investment income

     (122,718

Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions

     (5,424,216

Net unrealized appreciation on investments

     18,798,794   
  

 

 

 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders

   $     135,675,453   
  

 

 

 

Net Asset Value Applicable to Common Shareholders
(based on 8,554,668 common shares outstanding)

   $ 15.86   
  

 

 

 

 

*   Represents short-term floating rate certificates issued by tender option bond trusts (see Note H).

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       15   

Statement of Assets & Liabilities


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Six Months Ended April 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Investment Income      

Interest

   $     4,057,742      

Dividends—Affiliated issuers

     1,573       $ 4,059,315   
  

 

 

    
Expenses      

Advisory fee (see Note B)

     659,395      

Auction Preferred Shares-auction agent’s fees

     9,239      

Custodian

     44,137      

Audit and tax

     31,806      

Legal

     26,797      

Printing

     17,684      

Registration fees

     11,908      

Directors’ fees

     9,719      

Transfer agency

     9,133      

Miscellaneous

     29,484      
  

 

 

    

Total expenses before interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs

     849,302      

Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs

     343,642      
  

 

 

    

Total expenses

        1,192,944   
     

 

 

 

Net investment income

        2,866,371   
     

 

 

 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions      

Net realized gain on:

     

Investment transactions

        335,470   

Swaps

        46,649   

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of:

     

Investments

        5,952,145   

Swaps

        (48,608
     

 

 

 

Net gain on investment transactions

        6,285,656   
     

 

 

 
Dividends to Auction Preferred Shareholders from      

Net investment income

        (59,668
     

 

 

 

Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations

      $     9,092,359   
     

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

16     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Statement of Operations


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

     Six Months Ended
April 30, 2016
(unaudited)
    Year Ended
October 31,
2015
 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations     

Net investment income

   $ 2,866,371      $ 6,394,156   

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     382,119        1,566,266   

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments

     5,903,537        (2,652,119
Dividends to Auction Preferred Shareholders from     

Net investment income

     (59,668     (80,388
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets applicable to common shareholders resulting from operations

     9,092,359        5,227,915   
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders from     

Net investment income

     (3,033,913     (6,436,532
Common Stock Transactions     

Net increase

     – 0  –      2,488,667   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase

     6,058,446        1,280,050   
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders     

Beginning of period

     129,617,007        128,336,957   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income and undistributed net investment income of ($122,718) and $104,492, respectively)

   $     135,675,453      $     129,617,007   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       17   

Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders


STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended April 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Cash flows from operating activities     

Net increase in net assets from operations

     $ 9,152,027   
Reconciliation of net increase in net assets from operations to net increase in cash from operating activities:     

Decrease in interest and dividends receivable

   $ 10,062     

Net accretion of bond discount and amortization of bond premium

     570,816     

Decrease in payable for investments purchased

     (33,011  

Decrease in other assets

     17,879     

Decrease in accrued expenses

     (69,251  

Purchases of long-term investments

         (14,341,145  

Purchases of short-term investments

     (5,264,153  

Proceeds from disposition of long-term investments

     14,785,249     

Proceeds from disposition of short-term investments

     5,264,153     

Proceeds on swaps, net

     46,649     

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     (382,119  

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions

     (5,903,537  
  

 

 

   

Total adjustments

       (5,298,408
    

 

 

 

Net increase in cash from operating activities

     $     3,853,619   
    

 

 

 
Cash flows from financing activities     

Decrease in due to custodian

     (262,641  

Cash dividends paid

     (3,090,978  

Decrease in payable for floating rate notes issued

     (500,000  
  

 

 

   

Net decrease in cash from financing activities

       (3,853,619
    

 

 

 

Net increase in cash

         

Net change in cash

    

Cash at beginning of period

         
    

 

 

 

Cash at end of period

     $   
    

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Interest expense paid during the period

   $ 331,108     

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Fund has included a Statement of Cash Flows as a result of its substantial investments in floating rate notes and Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares throughout the period.

See notes to financial statements.

 

18     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Statement of Cash Flows


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

April 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

NOTE A

Significant Accounting Policies

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) was incorporated in the State of Maryland on November 9, 2001 and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Fund is an investment company under U.S. GAAP and follows the accounting and reporting guidance applicable to investment companies. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund.

1. Security Valuation

Portfolio securities are valued at their current market value determined on the basis of market quotations or, if market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable, at “fair value” as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”).

In general, the market values of securities which are readily available and deemed reliable are determined as follows: securities listed on a national securities exchange (other than securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”)) or on a foreign securities exchange are valued at the last sale price at the close of the exchange or foreign securities exchange. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the last traded price from the previous day. Securities listed on more than one exchange are valued by reference to the principal exchange on which the securities are traded; securities listed only on NASDAQ are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price; listed or over the counter (“OTC”) market put or call options are valued at the mid level between the current bid and ask prices. If either a current bid or current ask price is unavailable, AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) will have discretion to determine the best valuation (e.g. last trade price in the case of listed options); open futures are valued using the closing settlement price or, in the absence of such a price, the most recent quoted bid price. If there are no quotations available for the day of valuation, the last available closing settlement price is used; U.S. Government securities and any other debt instruments having 60 days or less remaining until maturity are generally valued at market by an independent pricing vendor, if a market price is available. If a market price is not available, the securities are valued at amortized cost. This methodology is commonly used for short term securities that have an original maturity of 60 days or less, as well as short term securities that had an original term to maturity that exceeded 60 days. In instances when amortized cost is utilized, the Valuation Committee (the

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       19   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

“Committee”) must reasonably conclude that the utilization of amortized cost is approximately the same as the fair value of the security. Such factors the Committee will consider include, but are not limited to, an impairment of the creditworthiness of the issuer or material changes in interest rates. Fixed-income securities, including mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service or at a price obtained from one or more of the major broker-dealers. In cases where broker-dealer quotes are obtained, the Adviser may establish procedures whereby changes in market yields or spreads are used to adjust, on a daily basis, a recently obtained quoted price on a security. Swaps and other derivatives are valued daily, primarily using independent pricing services, independent pricing models using market inputs, as well as third party broker-dealers or counterparties. Investment companies are valued at their net asset value each day.

Securities for which market quotations are not readily available (including restricted securities) or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents. In addition, the Fund may use fair value pricing for securities primarily traded in non-U.S. markets because most foreign markets close well before the Fund values its securities at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The earlier close of these foreign markets gives rise to the possibility that significant events, including broad market moves, may have occurred in the interim and may materially affect the value of those securities. To account for this, the Fund may frequently value many of its foreign equity securities using fair value prices based on third party vendor modeling tools to the extent available.

2. Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with U.S. GAAP regarding fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price that the Fund would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability (including those valued based on their market values as described in Note A.1 above). Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Fund. Unobservable inputs reflect the Fund’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Each investment is assigned a level

 

20     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.

 

   

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

   

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

   

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The fair value of debt instruments, such as bonds, and over-the-counter derivatives is generally based on market price quotations, recently executed market transactions (where observable) or industry recognized modeling techniques and are generally classified as Level 2. Pricing vendor inputs to Level 2 valuations may include quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, interest rate curves, coupon rates, currency rates, yield curves, option adjusted spreads, default rates, credit spreads and other unique security features in order to estimate the relevant cash flows which are then discounted to calculate fair values. If these inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value, these investments will be classified as Level 3. In addition, non-agency rated investments are classified as Level 3.

Other fixed income investments, including non-U.S. government and corporate debt, are generally valued using quoted market prices, if available, which are typically impacted by current interest rates, maturity dates and any perceived credit risk of the issuer. Additionally, in the absence of quoted market prices, these inputs are used by pricing vendors to derive a valuation based upon industry or proprietary models which incorporate issuer specific data with relevant yield/spread comparisons with more widely quoted bonds with similar key characteristics. Those investments for which there are observable inputs are classified as Level 2. Where the inputs are not observable, the investments are classified as Level 3.

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s investments by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of April 30, 2016:

 

Investments in Securities:

  Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  

Assets:

       

Long-Term Municipal Bonds

  $ – 0  –    $ 208,062,274      $ 3,898,742      $ 211,961,016   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investments in Securities

    – 0  –      208,062,274        3,898,742        211,961,016   

Other Financial Instruments(a):

       

Assets:

       

Interest Rate Swaps

    – 0  –      43,737        – 0  –      43,737   

Liabilities:

    – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(b)

  $   – 0  –    $   208,106,011      $   3,898,742      $   212,004,753   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)   

Other financial instruments are derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards and swaps, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument.

 

(b)   

There were no transfers between any levels during the reporting period.

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       21   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

The Fund recognizes all transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy assuming the financial instruments were transferred at the beginning of the reporting period.

The following is a reconciliation of investments in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value.

 

     Long-Term
Municipal
Bonds
    Total  

Balance as of 10/31/15

  $   3,876,970      $   3,876,970   

Accrued discounts/(premiums)

    (3,202     (3,202

Realized gain (loss)

    (397,407     (397,407

Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation

    592,285        592,285   

Purchases

    – 0  –      – 0  – 

Sales

    (169,904     (169,904

Transfers in to Level 3

    – 0  –      – 0  – 

Transfers out of Level 3

    – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of 4/30/16

  $ 3,898,742      $ 3,898,742   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments held as of 4/30/16(a)

  $ 246,225      $ 246,225   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)   

The unrealized appreciation/depreciation is included in net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments and other financial instruments in the accompanying statement of operations.

As of April 30, 2016, all Level 3 securities were priced by third party vendors.

The Adviser established the Committee to oversee the pricing and valuation of all securities held in the Fund. The Committee operates under pricing and valuation policies and procedures established by the Adviser and approved by the Board, including pricing policies which set forth the mechanisms and processes to be employed on a daily basis to implement these policies and procedures. In particular, the pricing policies describe how to determine market quotations for securities and other instruments. The Committee’s responsibilities include: 1) fair value and liquidity determinations (and oversight of any third parties to whom any responsibility for fair value and liquidity determinations is delegated), and 2) regular monitoring of the Adviser’s pricing and valuation policies and procedures and modification or enhancement of these policies and procedures (or recommendation of the modification of these policies and procedures) as the Committee believes appropriate.

The Committee is also responsible for monitoring the implementation of the pricing policies by the Adviser’s Pricing Group (the “Pricing Group”) and a third party which performs certain pricing functions in accordance with the pricing policies. The Pricing Group is responsible for the oversight of the third party on a day-to-day basis. The Committee and the Pricing Group perform a series of activities to provide reasonable assurance of the accuracy of prices including: 1) periodic vendor due diligence meetings, review of methodologies, new

 

22     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

developments and processes at vendors, 2) daily comparison of security valuation versus prior day for all securities that exceeded established thresholds, and 3) daily review of unpriced, stale, and variance reports with exceptions reviewed by senior management and the Committee.

In addition, several processes outside of the pricing process are used to monitor valuation issues including: 1) performance and performance attribution reports are monitored for anomalous impacts based upon benchmark performance, and 2) portfolio managers review all portfolios for performance and analytics (which are generated using the Adviser’s prices).

3. Taxes

It is the Fund’s policy to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its investment company taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no provisions for federal income or excise taxes are required.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, management has analyzed the Fund’s tax positions taken or expected to be taken on federal and state income tax returns for all open tax years (the current and the prior three tax years) and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Fund’s financial statements.

4. Investment Income and Investment Transactions

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as the Fund is informed of the dividend. Interest income is accrued daily. Investment transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold. Investment gains or losses are determined on the identified cost basis. The Fund amortizes premiums and accretes original issue discounts and market discounts as adjustments to interest income.

5. Dividends and Distributions

Dividends and distributions to shareholders, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income dividends and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal tax regulations and may differ from those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To the extent these differences are permanent, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require such reclassification.

NOTE B

Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Under the terms of an investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Adviser an advisory fee at the annual rate of 0.65% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Such advisory fee, which is calculated on the basis of the assets attributable to the Fund’s common and preferred shareholders, is accrued daily and paid monthly. In computing daily net assets for purposes of determining the

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       23   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

advisory fee payable, the Fund calculates daily the value of the total assets of the Fund, minus the value of the total liabilities of the Fund, except that the aggregate liquidation preference of the VMTP shares, which is a liability for financial reporting purposes, is not deducted.

Under the terms of the Shareholder Inquiry Agency Agreement with AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, the Fund reimburses ABIS for costs relating to servicing phone inquiries on behalf of the Fund. During the six months ended April 30, 2016, there was no reimbursement paid to ABIS.

The Fund may invest in the AB Fixed-Income Shares, Inc.—Government STIF Portfolio (“Government STIF Portfolio”), an open-end management investment company managed by the Adviser. The Government STIF Portfolio is offered as a cash management option to mutual funds and other institutional accounts of the Adviser, and is not currently available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Government STIF Portfolio currently pays no investment management fees but does bear its own expenses. A summary of the Fund’s transactions in shares of the Government STIF Portfolio for the six months ended April 30, 2016 is as follows:

 

Market Value

October 31, 2015

(000)

    Purchases
at Cost
(000)
    Sales
Proceeds
(000)
   

Market Value

April 30, 2016

(000)

    Dividend
Income
(000)
 
$     – 0 –      $     5,264      $     5,264      $     – 0 –      $     2   

NOTE C

Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:

 

     Purchases     Sales  

Investment securities (excluding U.S. government securities)

   $     14,341,145      $     14,714,085   

U.S. government securities

     – 0  –      – 0  – 

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, gross unrealized appreciation and unrealized depreciation (excluding swap transactions) are as follows:

 

Gross unrealized appreciation

   $ 18,785,832   

Gross unrealized depreciation

     (30,775
  

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation

   $     18,755,057   
  

 

 

 

 

24     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

1. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Fund may use derivatives in an effort to earn income and enhance returns, to replace more traditional direct investments, to obtain exposure to otherwise inaccessible markets (collectively, “investment purposes”), or to hedge or adjust the risk profile of its portfolio.

The principal types of derivatives utilized by the Fund, as well as the methods in which they may be used are:

 

   

Swaps

The Fund may enter into swaps to hedge its exposure to interest rates or credit risk. A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified amount of an underlying asset. The payment flows are usually netted against each other, with the difference being paid by one party to the other. In addition, collateral may be pledged or received by the Fund in accordance with the terms of the respective swaps to provide value and recourse to the Fund or its counterparties in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency by one of the parties to the swap.

Risks may arise as a result of the failure of the counterparty to the swap to comply with the terms of the swap. The loss incurred by the failure of a counterparty is generally limited to the net interim payment to be received by the Fund, and/or the termination value at the end of the contract. Therefore, the Fund considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a swap in evaluating potential counterparty risk. This risk is mitigated by having a netting arrangement between the Fund and the counterparty and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Fund to cover the Fund’s exposure to the counterparty. Additionally, risks may arise from unanticipated movements in interest rates or in the value of the underlying securities. The Fund accrues for the interim payments on swaps on a daily basis, with the net amount recorded within unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of assets and liabilities, where applicable. Once the interim payments are settled in cash, the net amount is recorded as realized gain/(loss) on swaps on the statement of operations, in addition to any realized gain/(loss) recorded upon the termination of swaps. Upfront premiums paid or received are recognized as cost or proceeds on the statement of assets and liabilities and are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the contract. Amortized upfront premiums are included in net realized gain/(loss) from swaps on the statement of operations. Fluctuations in the value of swaps are recorded as a component of net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of operations.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       25   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Interest Rate Swaps:

The Fund is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Fund holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To help hedge against this risk and to maintain its ability to generate income at prevailing market rates, the Fund may enter into interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional amount. The Fund may elect to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate, or, receive a fixed rate and pay a floating rate on a notional amount.

In addition, a Fund may also enter into interest rate swap transactions to preserve a return or spread on a particular investment or portion of its portfolio, or protect against an increase in the price of securities the Fund anticipates purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange by a Fund with another party of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments) computed based on a contractually-based principal (or “notional”) amount. Interest rate swaps are entered into on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted out, with the Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments).

During the six months ended April 30, 2016, the Fund held interest rate swaps for hedging purposes.

The Fund typically enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreements (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar master agreements (collectively, “Master Agreements”) with its derivative contract counterparties in order to, among other things, reduce its credit risk to counterparties. ISDA Master Agreements include provisions for general obligations, representations, collateral and events of default or termination. Under an ISDA Master Agreement, the Fund typically may offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instrument’s payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment (close-out netting) in the event of default or termination.

Various Master Agreements govern the terms of certain transactions with counterparties, including transactions such as derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. These Master Agreements typically attempt to reduce the counterparty risk associated with such transactions by specifying credit protection mechanisms and providing standardization that improves legal certainty. Cross-termination provisions under Master Agreements typically provide that a default in connection with one transaction between the Fund and a counterparty gives the non-defaulting party the right to terminate any other transactions in place with the defaulting party to create one single net payment due to/due from the defaulting party. In the event of a default by a

 

26     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Master Agreements counterparty, the return of collateral with market value in excess of the Fund’s net liability, held by the defaulting party, may be delayed or denied.

The Fund’s Master Agreements may contain provisions for early termination of OTC derivative transactions in the event the net assets of the Fund decline below specific levels (“net asset contingent features”). If these levels are triggered, the Fund’s counterparty has the right to terminate such transaction and require the Fund to pay or receive a settlement amount in connection with the terminated transaction. For additional details, please refer to netting arrangements by counterparty tables below.

At April 30, 2016, the Fund had entered into the following derivatives:

 

    

Asset Derivatives

   

Liability Derivatives

Derivative Type

 

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value    

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value

Interest rate contracts

  Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps   $ 43,737       
   

 

 

     

Total

    $     43,737       
   

 

 

     

 

Derivative Type

 

Location of Gain

or (Loss) on
Derivatives Within
Statement of
Operations

  Realized Gain
or (Loss) on
Derivatives
    Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation or
(Depreciation)
 

Interest rate contracts

  Net realized gain (loss) on swaps; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps   $ 46,649      $ (48,608
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    $     46,649      $     (48,608
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table represents the average monthly volume of the Fund’s derivative transactions during the six months ended April 30, 2016:

 

Interest Rate Swaps:

  

Average notional amount

   $ 2,300,000   

For financial reporting purposes, the Fund does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the statement of assets and liabilities.

All derivatives held at period end were subject to netting arrangements. The following table presents the Fund’s derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       27   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

net of amounts available for offset under Master Agreements (“MA”) and net of the related collateral received/ pledged by the Fund as of April 30, 2016:

 

Counterparty

  Derivative
Assets
Subject to a
MA
    Derivative
Available for
Offset
    Cash
Collateral
Received
    Security
Collateral
Received
    Net Amount
of Derivatives
Assets
 

OTC Derivatives:

         

Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.

  $ 43,737      $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ 43,737   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $   43,737      $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   43,737 ^ 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

^   Net amount represents the net receivable/(payable) that would be due from/to the counterparty in the event of default or termination. The net amount from OTC financial derivative instruments can only be netted across transactions governed under the same master agreement with the same counterparty.

NOTE D

Common Stock

There are 8,554,668 shares of common stock outstanding at April 30, 2016. During the six months ended April 30, 2016 and year ended October 31, 2015, the Fund did not issue any shares in connection with the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan.

NOTE E

Auction Preferred Shares

The Fund has 3,240 shares authorized, and 1,195 shares issued and outstanding of auction preferred shares (“APS”), consisting of 771 shares of Series M and 424 shares of series T. The APS have a liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus accumulated, unpaid dividends. The dividend rate on the APS may change every 7 days as set by the auction agent for Series M and T. Due to the recent failed auctions, the dividend rate is the “maximum rate” set by the terms of the APS, which is based on AA commercial paper rates and short-term municipal bond rates. The dividend rate on Series M is 0.67% effective through May 2, 2016. The dividend rate on Series T is 0.67% effective through May 3, 2016.

At certain times, the Fund may voluntarily redeem the APS in certain circumstances. The Fund is not required to redeem any of its APS and expects to continue to rely on the APS for a portion of its leverage exposure. The Fund may also pursue other liquidity solutions for the APS. During the year ended October 31, 2015, the Fund conducted a tender offer (the “Offer”) for its APS at a price reflecting a discount to its liquidation preference. The Fund offered to purchase up to 100% of its APS, at a price equal to 94% of the liquidation preference of $25,000 per share (or $23,500 per share), plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the termination date of the Offer. The Offer expired on Monday, August 24, 2015, and all shares that were validly tendered and not withdrawn during the offering period were accepted for payment. In aggregate,

 

28     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

the Fund accepted for payment 1,707 APS, which represented approximately $42,675,000 or 59% of its outstanding APS (at $25,000 per share). Payment for such shares was made by the Fund on September 1, 2015. APS that were not tendered remain outstanding. The shares accepted represent, approximately 47% and 71% of outstanding Series M and Series T, respectively. The difference of $2,560,500 between the liquidation preference of the APS and the actual purchase price of the tendered APS, net of legal, printing, mailing, information agent and registration fees of $71,833, was recorded by the Fund as “Net increase on tendered and repurchased Auction Preferred Shares” on the statement of changes in net assets. The Fund financed the tender offer payment by issuing Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares.

Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares

During the year ended October 31, 2015, the Fund also completed a private offering of Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (“VMTPS”), having a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. The Fund issued and sold 1,605 VMTPS in its offering. The net proceeds from the offering were used to repurchase the APS that were accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer. The VMTPS rank pari passu with the remaining outstanding APS but are subject to a mandatory redemption by the Fund in September 2022. The cost of leverage to the Fund resulting from the issuance of VMTPS is expected to vary over time and to differ from, and in some cases may exceed, the cost of leverage associated with the APS, as is the case at April 30, 2016, although the Adviser anticipates that, in general, an increase in interest rates beyond a certain level may result in the VMTPS being more economical to the Fund.

VMTPS generally do not trade, and market quotations are generally not available. VMTPS are short-term or short/intermediate-term instruments that pay a variable dividend rate tied to a short-term index, plus an additional fixed “spread” amount established at the time of issuance. As of April 30, 2016, the dividend rate for the VMTPS was 1.71%. In the Fund’s statement of assets and liabilities, the aggregate liquidation preference of the VMTPS is shown as a liability in accordance with U.S. GAAP because the VMTPS have a stated mandatory redemption date.

Dividends on the VMTPS (which are treated as interest payments for financial reporting purposes) are set weekly. Unpaid dividends on VMTPS are recorded as “Interest expense payable” on the statement of assets and liabilities. Dividends accrued on VMTPS are recorded as a component of “Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs” on the statement of operations.

Costs incurred by the Fund in connection with its offering of VMTPS were recorded as a deferred charge, which are amortized over the life of the shares and are recorded as “Deferred offering costs” on the statement of assets and liabilities and included within “Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs” on the statement of operations. The VMTPS are treated as equity for tax purposes.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       29   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

The preferred shareholders, including the holders of both the APS and VMTPS, voting together as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors in the event two years’ dividends on the preferred shares are unpaid. In each case, the remaining directors will be elected by the common shareholders and preferred shareholders voting together as a single class. The preferred shareholders will vote as a separate class on certain other matters as required under the Fund’s Charter, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Maryland law, and management regularly evaluates, and discusses with the Fund’s Board of Directors, the costs and potential benefits of alternative sources of leverage for the Fund.

NOTE F

Distributions to Common Shareholders

The tax character of distributions to be paid for the year ending October 31, 2016 will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year. The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

     2015      2014  

Distributions paid from:

     

Ordinary income

   $ 80,447       $ 80,447   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Tax-exempt income

     6,356,085         6,356,085   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total distributions paid

   $     6,436,532       $     6,436,532   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of October 31, 2015, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

Undistributed tax-exempt income

   $ 152,812   

Accumulated capital and other losses

     (5,734,333 )(a) 

Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation)

         12,820,425 (b) 
  

 

 

 

Total accumulated earnings/(deficit)

   $     7,238,904 (c) 
  

 

 

 

 

(a)  

On October 31, 2015, the Fund had a net capital loss carryforward of $5,734,333. During the fiscal year, the Fund utilized $1,443,393 of capital loss carryforwards to offset current year net realized gains.

 

(b)  

The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax treatment of tender option bonds and swaps.

 

(c)  

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable.

For tax purposes, net capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains, if any. Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an indefinite period. These post-December 22, 2010 capital losses must be utilized prior to the earlier capital losses, which are subject to expiration. Post-December 22, 2010 capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered short-term as under previous regulation.

 

30     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

As of October 31, 2015, the Fund had a net capital loss carryforward of $5,734,333 which will expire as follows:

 

Short-term
Amount

 

Long-term
Amount

 

Expiration

$2,248,276   n/a   2019
1,084,521   $2,401,536   no expiration

NOTE G

Risks Involved in Investing in the Fund

Interest Rate Risk—Changes in interest rates will affect the value of the Fund’s investments in Underlying Funds that invest in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed-income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.

Credit Risk—An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security and accrued interest. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations.

Municipal Market Risk—This is the risk that special factors may adversely affect the value of municipal securities and have a significant effect on the yield or value of the Fund’s investments in municipal securities. These factors include economic conditions, political or legislative changes, uncertainties related to the tax status of municipal securities, or the rights of investors in these securities. The Fund invests primarily in securities issued by the State of California and its various political subdivisions. The Fund’s investments in California municipal securities may be vulnerable to events adversely affecting California’s economy. California, largest of the 50 states, is relatively diverse, which makes it less vulnerable to events affecting a particular industry. Its economy, however, continues to be affected by serious fiscal conditions as a result of voter passed initiatives that limit the ability of state and local governments to raise revenues, particularly with respect to real property taxes. California’s economy may also be affected by natural disasters, such as earthquakes or fires. The Fund’s investments in certain municipal securities with principal and interest payments that are made from the revenues of a specific project or facility, and not general tax revenues, may have increased risks. Factors affecting the project or facility, such as local business or economic conditions, could have a significant effect on

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       31   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

the project’s ability to make payments of principal and interest on these securities.

Derivatives Risk—The Fund may enter into derivative transactions such as forwards, options, futures and swaps. Derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments. Derivatives may result in significant losses, including losses that are far greater than the value of the derivatives reflected in the statement of assets and liabilities.

Financing and Related Transactions; Leverage and Other Risks—The Fund utilizes leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value attributable to its common stock. These objectives may not be achieved in all interest rate environments. Leverage creates certain risks for holders of common stock, including the likelihood of greater volatility of the net asset value and market price of the common stock. If income from the securities purchased from the funds made available by leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, the Fund’s return will be less than if leverage had not been used. As a result, the amounts available for distribution to common stockholders as dividends and other distributions will be reduced. During periods of rising short-term interest rates, the interest paid on the Preferred shares or floaters in tender option bond transactions would increase, which may adversely affect the Fund’s income and distribution to common stockholders. A decline in distributions would adversely affect the Fund’s yield and possibly the market value of its shares. If rising short-term rates coincide with a period of rising long-term rates, the value of the long-term municipal bonds purchased with the proceeds of leverage would decline, adversely affecting the net asset value attributable to the Fund’s common stock and possibly the market value of the shares.

The Fund’s outstanding APS and VMTPS result in leverage. The Fund may also use other types of financial leverage, including tender option bond transactions, either in combination with, or in lieu of, the Preferred shares. In a tender option bond transaction, the Fund may transfer a highly rated fixed-rate municipal security to a broker, which, in turn, deposits the bond into a special purpose vehicle (typically, a trust) usually sponsored by the broker. The Fund receives cash and a residual interest security (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) issued by the trust in return. The trust simultaneously issues securities, which pay an interest rate that is reset each week based on an index of high-grade short-term seven-day demand notes. These securities, sometimes referred to as “floaters”, are bought by third parties, including tax-exempt money market funds, and can be tendered by these holders to a liquidity provider at par, unless certain events occur. The Fund continues to earn all the interest from the transferred bond less the amount of interest paid on the floaters and the expenses of the trust, which include payments to the trustee and the liquidity provider and

 

32     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

organizational costs. The Fund also uses the cash received from the transaction for investment purposes or to retire other forms of leverage. Under certain circumstances, the trust may be terminated and collapsed, either by the Fund or upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, or in the event holders of the floaters tender their securities to the liquidity provider. See Note H to the financial statements for more information about tender option bond transactions.

The Fund may also purchase inverse floaters from a tender option bond trust in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. The income received from an inverse floater varies inversely with the short-term interest rate paid on the floaters issued by the trust. The prices of inverse floaters are subject to greater volatility than the prices of fixed-income securities that are not inverse floaters. Investments in inverse floaters may amplify the risks of leverage. If short-term interest rates rise, the interest payable on the floaters would increase and income from the inverse floaters decrease, resulting in decreased amounts of income available for distribution to common stockholders.

The use of derivative instruments by the Fund, such as forwards, futures, options and swaps, may also result in a form of leverage.

Because the advisory fees received by the Adviser are based on the total net assets of the Fund (including assets supported by the proceeds of the Fund’s outstanding preferred shares), the Adviser has a financial incentive for the Fund to keep its preferred shares outstanding, which may create a conflict of interest between the Adviser and the common shareholders of the Fund.

Duration Risk—Duration is the measure that relates the expected price volatility of a fixed-income security to changes in interest rates. The duration of a fixed-income security may be shorter than or equal to full maturity of a fixed-income security. Fixed-income securities with longer durations have more risk and will decrease in price as interest rates rise. For example, a fixed-income security with a duration of three years will decrease in value by approximately 3% if interest rates increase by 1%.

Inflation Risk—This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the real value of the Fund’s assets can decline as can the real value of the Fund’s distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.

Liquidity Risk—Liquidity risk occurs when certain investments become difficult to purchase or sell. Difficulty in selling less liquid securities may result in sales at disadvantageous prices affecting the value of your investment in the Fund. Causes of liquidity risk may include low trading volumes and large positions of Fund shares. Over recent years liquidity risk has also increased

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       33   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

because the capacity of dealers in the secondary market for fixed-income securities to make markets in these securities has decreased, even as the overall bond market has grown significantly, due to, among other things, structural changes, additional regulatory requirements and capital and risk restraints that have led to reduced inventories. Liquidity risk may be higher in a rising interest rate environment, when the value and liquidity of fixed-income securities generally decline. Municipal securities may have more liquidity risk than other fixed-income securities because they trade less frequently and the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets.

Tax Risk—There is no guarantee that all of the Fund’s income will remain exempt from federal or state income taxes. From time to time, the U.S. Government and the U.S. Congress consider changes in federal tax law that could limit or eliminate the federal tax exemption for municipal bond income, which would in effect reduce the income received by shareholders from the Fund by increasing taxes on that income. In such event, the Fund’s NAV could also decline as yields on municipal bonds, which are typically lower than those on taxable bonds, would be expected to increase to approximately the yield of comparable taxable bonds.

Indemnification Risk—In the ordinary course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these indemnification provisions and expects the risk of loss thereunder to be remote. Therefore, the Fund has not accrued any liability in connection with these indemnification provisions.

NOTE H

Floating Rate Notes Issued in Connection with Securities Held

The Fund may engage in tender option bond transactions in which the Fund transfers a fixed rate bond (“Fixed Rate Bond”) to a broker for cash. The broker deposits the Fixed Rate Bond into a Special Purpose Vehicle (the “SPV”, which is generally organized as a trust), organized by the broker. The Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of the SPV, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (“Inverse Floater”). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (“Floating Rate Notes”) which are sold to third parties. The Floating Rate Notes pay interest at rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to a liquidity provider for redemption at par. The Inverse Floater held by the Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the trustee transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby collapsing the SPV. The SPV may also be collapsed in certain other circumstances. In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, the Fund accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in its portfolio of investments and the Floating

 

34     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its statement of assets and liabilities. Interest expense related to the Fund’s liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The interest expense is also included in the Fund’s expense ratio. At April 30, 2016, the amount of the Fund’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding was $7,950,000 and the related interest rate was 0.51%.

The Fund may also purchase Inverse Floaters in the secondary market without first owning the underlying bond. Such an Inverse Floater is included in the Fund’s portfolio of investments but is not required to be treated as a secured borrowing and reflected in the Fund’s financial statements as a secured borrowing. For the six months ended April 30, 2016, the Fund did not engage in such transactions.

NOTE I

New Accounting Pronouncement

In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update, ASU 2015-07 (the “ASU”) which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The ASU also removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient but do not utilize that practical expedient. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of these changes on the financial statements.

NOTE J

Subsequent Events

The Government STIF Portfolio, prior to June 1, 2016, was offered as a cash management option to mutual funds and other institutional accounts of the Adviser, and was not available for direct purchase by members of the public. Prior to June 1, 2016, the Government STIF Portfolio paid no investment management fees but did bear its own expenses. As of June 1, 2016, the Government STIF Portfolio, which was renamed “AB Government Money Market Portfolio” (the “Government Money Market Portfolio”), will have a contractual investment management fee rate of .20% and will continue to bear its own expenses. In connection with the investment by the Fund in the Government Money Market Portfolio, the Adviser will waive its investment management fee from the Fund in an amount equal to Government Money Market Portfolio’s effective management fee.

Management has evaluated subsequent events for possible recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued. Management has determined that there are no other material events that would require disclosure in the Fund’s financial statements through this date.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       35   

Notes to Financial Statements


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Selected Data For A Share Of Common Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period

 

    Six Months
Ended
April 30,
2016
(unaudited)
    Year Ended October 31,  
      2015     2014     2013     2012     2011  
 

 

 

 

Net asset value, beginning of period

    $  15.15        $  15.00        $  13.78        $  15.05        $  14.05        $  14.67   
 

 

 

 

Income From Investment Operations

           

Net investment income(a)

    .34        .75        .77        .74        .85 (b)      .98 (b) 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

    .73        (.13     1.21        (1.22     1.08        (.66

Dividends to preferred shareholders from net investment income (common stock equivalent basis)

    (.01     (.01     (.01     (.02     (.02     (.03
 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations

    1.06        .61        1.97        (.50     1.91        .29   
 

 

 

 

Less: Dividends to Common Shareholders from

           

Net investment income

    (.35     (.75     (.75     (.74     (.91     (.91

Return of capital

    – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  –      (.03     – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions

    (.35     (.75     (.75     (.77     (.91     (.91
 

 

 

 

Net increase from tender and repurchase of Auction Preferred Shares

    – 0  –      .29        – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

    $  15.86        $  15.15        $  15.00        $  13.78        $  15.05        $  14.05   
 

 

 

 

Market value, end of period

    $  15.11        $  14.18        $  13.79        $  12.45        $  15.70        $  13.69   
 

 

 

 

Premium/(Discount), end of period

    (4.73 )%      (6.40 )%      (8.07 )%      (9.65 )%      4.32  %      (2.56 )% 

Total Return

           

Total investment return based on:(c)

           

Market value

    9.54  %      8.61  %      17.39  %      (16.10 )%      22.02  %      3.28  % 

Net asset value

    4.48  %      6.68  %(d)      15.36  %      (3.13 )%      13.97  %      2.67  % 

See footnote summary on page 38.

 

36     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Financial Highlights


Selected Data For A Share Of Common Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period

 

    Six Months
Ended
April 30,
2016
(unaudited)
    Year Ended October 31,  
      2015     2014     2013     2012     2011  
 

 

 

 

Ratios/Supplemental Data

           

Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period
(000’s omitted)

    $135,675        $129,617        $128,337        $117,903        $128,713        $119,965   

Auction Preferred Shares:
Liquidation value ($25,000 per share)
(000’s omitted)

    $29,875        $29,875        $72,550        $72,550        $72,550        $72,550   

Asset coverage per share

    $73,455        $71,290        $69,250        $65,750        $69,250        $66,250   

Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares:
Liquidation value ($25,000 per share) (000’s omitted)

    $40,125        $40,125        $– 0  –      $– 0  –      $– 0  –      $– 0  – 

Asset coverage per share

    $73,455        $71,290        $– 0  –      $– 0  –      $– 0  –      $– 0  – 

Ratio to average net assets applicable to common shareholders of:

           

Expenses, net of waivers(e)(f)

    1.80  %^      1.44  %      1.44  %      1.43  %      1.39  %      1.30  % 

Expenses, before waivers(e)(f)

    1.80  %^      1.44  %      1.44  %      1.43  %      1.41  %      1.40  % 

Net investment income, before Preferred Shares dividends(e)

    4.31  %^      4.99  %      5.35  %      5.13  %      5.79  %(b)      7.20  %(b) 

Preferred Shares dividends

    .09  %      .06  %      .06  %      .11  %      .15  %      .20  % 

Net investment income, net of Preferred Shares dividends

    4.22  %      4.93  %      5.29  %      5.02  %      5.64  %(b)      7.00  %(b) 

Portfolio turnover rate

    7  %      18  %      32  %      25  %      46  %      14  % 

Preferred shares asset coverage ratio

    294  %      285  %      277  %      263  %      277  %      265  % 

See footnote summary on page 38.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       37   

Financial Highlights


(a)   Based on average shares outstanding.

 

(b)   Net of fees waived by the Adviser.

 

(c)   Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock on the opening of the first day and a sale on the closing of the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Generally, total investment return based on net asset value will be higher than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is an increase in the discount or a decrease in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. Conversely, total investment return based on net asset value will be lower than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is a decrease in the discount or an increase in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. Total investment return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.

 

(d)   The total return based on net asset value reflects the impact of the tender and repurchase by the Fund of a portion of its Auction Preferred Shares at 94% of the per share liquidation preference. Absent this transaction, the total return based on net asset values would have been 4.64%.

 

(e)   These expense and net investment income ratios do not reflect the effect of distribution payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(f)   The expense ratios presented below exclude interest expense:

 

     Six Months
Ended
April 30,
2016
(unaudited)
    Year Ended October 31,  
       2015     2014     2013     2012     2011  
  

 

 

 

Net of waivers

     1.28 %^      1.32     1.39     1.37     1.32     1.23

Before waivers

     1.28 %^      1.32     1.39     1.37     1.34     1.34

 

^   Annualized.

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

38     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Financial Highlights


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(unaudited)

Shareholders whose shares are registered in their own names can elect to participate in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”), pursuant to which dividends and capital gain distributions to shareholders will be paid in or reinvested in additional shares of the Fund (the “Dividend Shares”). Computershare Trust Company N.A. (the “Agent”) will act as agent for participants under the Plan. Shareholders whose shares are held in the name of broker or nominee should contact such broker or nominee to determine whether or how they may participate in the Plan.

If the Board declares an income distribution or determines to make a capital gain distribution payable either in shares or in cash, non-participants in the Plan will receive cash and participants in the Plan will receive the equivalent in shares of Common Stock of the Fund valued as follows:

 

  (i) If the shares of Common Stock are trading at net asset value or at a premium above net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of net asset value or 95% of the then current market price.

 

  (ii) If the shares of Common Stock are trading at a discount from net asset value at the time of valuation, the Agent will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and apply it to the purchase of the Fund’s shares of Common Stock in the open market on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere, for the participants’ accounts. Such purchases will be made on or shortly after the payment date for such dividend or distribution and in no event more than 30 days after such date except where temporary curtailment or suspension of purchase is necessary to comply with Federal securities laws. If, before the Agent has completed its purchases, the market price exceeds the net asset value of a share of Common Stock, the average purchase price per share paid by the Agent may exceed the net asset value of the Fund’s shares of Common Stock, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund.

The Agent will maintain all shareholders’ accounts in the Plan and furnish written confirmation of all transactions in the account, including information needed by shareholders for tax records. Shares in the account of each Plan participant will be held by the Agent in non-certificate form in the name of the participant, and each shareholder’s proxy will include those shares purchased or received pursuant to the Plan.

There will be no charges with respect to shares issued directly by the Fund to satisfy the dividend reinvestment requirements. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Agent’s open market purchases of shares.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       39   

Additional Information


The automatic reinvestment of dividends and distributions will not relieve participants of any income taxes that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on dividends and distributions.

Experience under the Plan may indicate that changes are desirable. Accordingly, the Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan as applied to any dividend or distribution paid subsequent to written notice of the change sent to participants in the Plan at least 90 days before the record date for such dividend or distribution. The Plan may also be amended or terminated by the Agent on at least 90 days’ written notice to participants in the Plan. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Agent at Computershare Trust Company N.A., P.O. Box 30170, College Station, TX 77842-3170.

 

40     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Additional Information


RESULTS OF STOCKHOLDERS MEETING

(unaudited)

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alliance California Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (“the Fund”) was held on March 31, 2016. A description of the proposal and number of shares voted at the Meeting are as follows:

To elect three Directors for a term of three years and until his successor is duly elected and qualifies.

Class One (term expires 2019)

 

     Voted
for
     Authority
Withheld
 

Common Shares:

     

John H. Dobkin

     1,956         0   

Michael J. Downey

     1,956         0   

Nancy P. Jacklin

     7,324,735         431,461   

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       41   

Results of Stockholders Meeting


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Marshall C. Turner, Jr.(1), Chairman

John H. Dobkin(1)

Michael J. Downey(1)

William H. Foulk, Jr.(1)

D. James Guzy(1)

  

Nancy P. Jacklin(1)

Robert M. Keith, President and Chief Executive Officer

Garry L. Moody(1)

Earl D. Weiner(1)

OFFICERS

Philip L. Kirstein,

Senior Vice President and Independent Compliance Officer

Robert “Guy” B. Davidson III,(2)
Senior Vice President

Fred S. Cohen,(2) Vice President

Terrance T. Hults,(2) Vice President

 

Matthew J. Norton,(2) Vice President

Emilie D. Wrapp, Secretary

Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Phyllis J. Clarke, Controller

Vincent S. Noto, Chief Compliance Officer

 

Custodian and Accounting Agent

State Street Bank and Trust Company

State Street Corporation CCB/5
1 Iron Street

Boston, MA 02210

 

Legal Counsel

Seward & Kissel LLP

One Battery Park Plaza

New York, NY 10004

 

Preferred Shares:

Dividend Paying Agent,

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street – 7W
New York, NY 10286

 

Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP

5 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

 

Common Stock:

Dividend Paying Agent,

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842-3170

 

(1)   Member of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Independent Directors Committee.

 

(2)   The day-to-day management of, and investment decisions for, the Fund’s portfolio are made by the Municipal Bond Investment Team. The investment professionals with the most significant responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio are: Robert “Guy” B. Davidson III, Fred S. Cohen, Terrance T. Hults and Matthew J. Norton.

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 that the Fund may purchase at market prices from time-to-time shares of its Common Stock in the open market.

This report, including the financial statements therein, is transmitted to the shareholders of Alliance California Municipal Income Fund for their information. This is not a prospectus, circular or representation intended for use in the purchase of shares of the Fund or any securities mentioned in the report.

Annual Certifications — As required, on April 29, 2016, the Fund submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) the annual certification of the Fund’s Chief Executive Officer certifying that he is not aware of any violation of the NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards. The Fund also has included the certifications of the Fund’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to the Fund’s Form N-CSR filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the period.

 

42     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

Board of Directors


 

 

Information Regarding the Review and Approval of the Fund’s Advisory Agreement

The disinterested directors (the “directors”) of Alliance California Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) unanimously approved the continuance of the Fund’s Advisory Agreement with the Adviser at a meeting held on November 3-5, 2015.

Prior to approval of the continuance of the Advisory Agreement, the directors had requested from the Adviser, and received and evaluated, extensive materials. They reviewed the proposed continuance of the Advisory Agreement with the Adviser and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Adviser, who advised on the relevant legal standards. The directors also discussed the proposed continuance in private sessions with counsel and the Fund’s Senior Officer (who is also the Fund’s Independent Compliance Officer).

The directors considered their knowledge of the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser to the Fund gained from their experience as directors or trustees of most of the registered investment companies advised by the Adviser, their overall confidence in the Adviser’s integrity and competence they have gained from that experience, the Adviser’s initiative in identifying and raising potential issues with the directors and its responsiveness, frankness and attention to concerns raised by the directors in the past, including the Adviser’s willingness to consider and implement organizational and operational changes designed to improve investment results and the services provided to the AB Funds. The directors noted that they have four regular meetings each year, at each of which they receive presentations from the Adviser on the investment results of the Fund and review extensive materials and information presented by the Adviser.

The directors also considered all other factors they believed relevant, including the specific matters discussed below. In their deliberations, the directors did not identify any particular information that was all-important or controlling, and different directors may have attributed different weights to the various factors. The directors determined that the selection of the Adviser to manage the Fund and the overall arrangements between the Fund and the Adviser, as provided in the Advisory Agreement, including the advisory fee, were fair and reasonable in light of the services performed, expenses incurred and such other matters as the directors considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the directors’ determinations included the following:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided

The directors considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement, including the quality of the investment research capabilities of the Adviser and the other resources it has dedicated to

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       43   


 

 

performing services for the Fund. They also noted the professional experience and qualifications of the Fund’s portfolio management team and other senior personnel of the Adviser. The directors also considered that the Advisory Agreement provides that the Fund will reimburse the Adviser for the cost to it of providing certain clerical, accounting, administrative and other services to the Fund by employees of the Adviser or its affiliates. Requests for these reimbursements are made on a quarterly basis and subject to approval by the directors. Reimbursements, to the extent requested and paid, result in a higher rate of total compensation from the Fund to the Adviser than the fee rate stated in the Fund’s Advisory Agreement. The directors noted that to date the Adviser had not requested such reimbursements from the Fund. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Adviser’s role in coordinating the activities of the Fund’s other service providers, also was considered. The directors concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Agreement.

Costs of Services Provided and Profitability

The directors reviewed a schedule of the revenues, expenses and related notes indicating the profitability of the Fund to the Adviser for calendar years 2013 and 2014 that had been prepared with an expense allocation methodology arrived at in consultation with an independent consultant retained by the Fund’s Senior Officer. The directors noted the assumptions and methods of allocation used by the Adviser in preparing fund-specific profitability data and understood that there are a number of potentially acceptable allocation methodologies for information of this type. The directors noted that the profitability information reflected all revenues and expenses of the Adviser’s relationship with the Fund, including those relating to its subsidiary that provides shareholder services to the Fund. The directors recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of the profitability of the Advisory Agreement with the profitability of advisory contracts for unaffiliated funds because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors. The directors focused on the profitability of the Adviser’s relationship with the Fund before taxes. The directors were satisfied that the Adviser’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Fund was not unreasonable.

Fall-Out Benefits

The directors considered the other benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates from their relationships with the Fund, including, but not limited to, benefits relating to shareholder servicing fees paid by the Fund to a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser. The directors recognized that the Adviser’s profitability would be somewhat lower without these benefits. The directors understood that the Adviser also might derive reputational and other benefits from its association with the Fund.

 

44     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND


 

 

Investment Results

In addition to the information reviewed by the directors in connection with the meeting, the directors receive detailed performance information for the Fund at each regular Board meeting during the year. At the November 2015 meeting, the directors reviewed information prepared by Broadridge showing the performance of the Fund as compared with that of a group of similar funds selected by Broadridge (the “Performance Group”), and information prepared by the Adviser showing the Fund’s performance as compared with the Barclays Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), in each case for the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year periods ended July 31, 2015 and (in the case of comparisons with the Index) the period since inception (January 2002 inception). The directors noted that the Fund was in the 5th quintile of the Performance Group for the 1-, 3- and 5-year periods, and in the 3rd quintile of the Performance Group for the 10-year period. The directors noted the small number of other funds in the Performance Group. The directors noted that the Fund outperformed the Index in all periods. The directors also noted that the Fund utilizes leverage whereas the Index is not leveraged. Based on their review and their discussion with the Adviser of the reasons for the Fund’s performance, the directors retained confidence in the Adviser’s ability to manage the Fund’s assets.

Advisory Fees and Other Expenses

The directors considered the latest fiscal year actual advisory fee rate paid by the Fund to the Adviser and information prepared by Broadridge concerning advisory fee rates paid by other funds in the same Broadridge category as the Fund. The directors also took into account their general knowledge of advisory fees paid by open-end and closed-end funds that invest in fixed-income municipal securities. The directors recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of advisory fees because there are variations in the services that are included in the fees paid by other funds.

The directors noted that the Fund’s latest fiscal year actual management fee rate of 65 basis points was higher than the Expense Group and the Expense Universe medians. The directors noted that Broadridge calculates the fee rate based on the Fund’s net assets attributable to common stockholders, whereas the Fund’s Advisory Agreement provides that fees are computed based on average daily net assets (i.e., including assets supported by the Fund’s preferred stock). The advisory fee rate and expense ratio information in this section is based on common and leveraged assets.

The directors noted that the Adviser advises several open-end funds that invest in California municipal securities at fee rates that are lower than the fee rate charged to the Fund, and that such rates reflect fee reductions agreed to by the Adviser in connection with the settlement of the market timing matter with the New York Attorney General in December 2003.

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       45   


 

 

The Adviser informed the directors that there were no institutional products managed by it that have a substantially similar investment style. The directors reviewed the relevant advisory fee information from the Adviser’s Form ADV and noted that the Adviser charged institutional clients lower fees for advising comparably sized institutional accounts using strategies that differ from those of the Fund but which invest in fixed income municipal securities. The Adviser reviewed with the directors the significantly greater scope of the services it provides the Fund relative to institutional clients. In light of the substantial differences in services rendered by the Adviser to institutional clients as compared to funds such as the Fund, the directors considered these fee comparisons inapt and did not place significant weight on them in their deliberations.

The directors also considered the total expense ratio of the Fund in comparison to the fees and expenses of funds within two comparison groups created by Broadridge: an Expense Group and an Expense Universe. Broadridge described an Expense Group as a representative sample of funds similar to the Fund and an Expense Universe as a broader group than the Expense Group, consisting of all funds in the Fund’s investment classification/objective. The expense ratio of the Fund was based on the Fund’s latest fiscal year. The directors noted that it was likely that the expense ratios of some of the other funds in the Fund’s Broadridge category also were lowered by waivers or reimbursements by those funds’ investment advisers, which in some cases might be voluntary or temporary. The directors view the expense ratio information as relevant to their evaluation of the Adviser’s services because the Adviser is responsible for coordinating services provided to the Fund by others.

The directors noted that the Fund’s total expense ratio was lower than the Expense Group and the Expense Universe medians. The directors concluded that the Fund’s expense ratio was satisfactory.

Economies of Scale

The advisory fee schedule for the Fund does not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rates on assets above specified levels. The directors considered that the Fund is a closed-end fixed-income fund and that it was not expected to have meaningful asset growth (absent a rights offering or an acquisition). In such circumstances, the directors did not view the potential for realization of economies of scale as the Fund’s assets grow to be a material factor in their deliberations. They noted that, if the Fund’s net assets were to increase materially, they would review whether potential economies of scale were being realized.

 

46     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND


SUMMARY OF GENERAL INFORMATION

 

Shareholder Information

Weekly comparative net asset value (NAV) and market price information about the Fund is published each Saturday in Barron’s and other newspapers in a table called “Closed-End Funds.” Daily net asset value and market price information, and additional information regarding the Fund, is available at www.alliancebernstein.com and at www.nyse.com.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

Pursuant to the Fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan, shareholders whose shares are registered in their own names may elect to have all distributions reinvested automatically in additional shares of the Fund by ComputerShare Trust Company, N.A., as agent under the Plan. Shareholders whose shares are held in the name of the broker or nominee should contact the broker or nominee for details. All distributions to investors who elect not to participate in the Plan will be paid by check mailed directly to the record holder by or under the direction of ComputerShare Trust Company, N.A.

For questions concerning shareholder account information, or if you would like a brochure describing the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, please call Computershare Trust Company at (800) 219-4218.

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       47   

Summary of General Information


THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AB FAMILY OF FUNDS

 

US EQUITY

 

US Core

Core Opportunities Fund

Select US Equity Portfolio

US Growth

Concentrated Growth Fund

Discovery Growth Fund

Growth Fund

Large Cap Growth Fund

Small Cap Growth Portfolio

US Value

Discovery Value Fund

Equity Income Fund

Growth & Income Fund

Small Cap Value Portfolio

Value Fund

INTERNATIONAL/ GLOBAL EQUITY

 

International/Global Core

Global Core Equity Portfolio

Global Equity & Covered Call Strategy Fund

Global Thematic Growth Fund

International Portfolio

International Strategic Core Portfolio

Tax-Managed International Portfolio

International/Global Growth

International Growth Fund

International/Global Value

Asia ex-Japan Equity Portfolio

International Value Fund

FIXED INCOME

 

Municipal

High Income Municipal Portfolio

Intermediate California Municipal Portfolio

Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio

Intermediate New York Municipal Portfolio

Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy

FIXED INCOME (continued)

 

Tax-Aware Fixed Income Portfolio

National Portfolio

Arizona Portfolio

California Portfolio

Massachusetts Portfolio

Michigan Portfolio

Minnesota Portfolio

New Jersey Portfolio

New York Portfolio

Ohio Portfolio

Pennsylvania Portfolio

Virginia Portfolio

Taxable

Bond Inflation Strategy

Global Bond Fund

High Income Fund

High Yield Portfolio

Income Fund

Intermediate Bond Portfolio

Limited Duration High Income Portfolio

Short Duration Portfolio

ALTERNATIVES

 

All Market Real Return Portfolio

Credit Long/Short Portfolio

Global Real Estate Investment Fund

Long/Short Multi-Manager Fund

Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund

Select US Long/Short Portfolio

Unconstrained Bond Fund

MULTI-ASSET

 

All Market Income Portfolio

Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio

Global Risk Allocation Fund

MULTI-ASSET (continued)

 

Target-Date

Multi-Manager Select Retirement Allocation Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2010 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2015 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2020 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2025 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2030 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2035 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2040 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2045 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2050 Fund

Multi-Manager Select 2055 Fund

Wealth Strategies

Balanced Wealth Strategy

Conservative Wealth Strategy

Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Tax-Managed Balanced Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Conservative Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy

CLOSED-END FUNDS

 

AB Multi-Manager Alternative Fund

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

 

We also offer Exchange Reserves, which serves as the money market fund exchange vehicle for the AB mutual funds. An investment in Exchange Reserves is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.abglobal.com or contact your AB representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

 

48     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

AB Family of Funds


NOTES

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       49   


NOTES

 

 

50     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND


NOTES

 

 

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND       51   


NOTES

 

 

52     ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND


Privacy Policy Statement

AllianceBernstein and its affiliates (collectively “AllianceBernstein”) understand the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of their clients’ nonpublic personal information. Nonpublic personal information is personally identifiable financial information about our clients who are natural persons. To provide financial products and services to our clients, we may collect information about clients from a variety of sources, including: (1) account documentation, including applications or other forms, which may include information such as a client’s name, address, phone number, social security number, assets, income and other household information, (2) client transactions with us and others, such as account balances and transactions history, and (3) information from visitors to our websites provided through online forms, site visitorship data and online information-collecting devices known as “cookies.”

It is our policy not to disclose nonpublic personal information about our clients or former clients (collectively “clients”), except to our affiliates, or to others as permitted or required by law. From time to time, we may disclose nonpublic personal information that we collect about our clients to non-affiliated third parties, including those that perform transaction processing or servicing functions, those that provide marketing services for us or on our behalf pursuant to a joint marketing agreement or those that provide professional services to us under a professional services agreement, all of which require the third party provider to adhere to our privacy policy. We have policies and procedures to safeguard nonpublic personal information about our clients that include restricting access to nonpublic personal information and maintaining physical, electronic and procedural safeguards which comply with applicable standards.

It is also our policy to prohibit the sharing of our clients’ personal information among our affiliated group of investment, brokerage, service and insurance companies for the purpose of marketing their products or services to clients, except as permitted by law. This information includes, but is not limited to, a client’s income and account history.

We have policies and procedures to ensure that certain conditions are met before an AllianceBernstein affiliated company may use information obtained from another affiliate to solicit clients for marketing purposes.


LOGO

ALLIANCE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10105

800.221.5672

 

ACMIF-0152-0416                 LOGO


ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

Please see Schedule of Investments contained in the Report to Shareholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

There have been no purchases of equity securities by the Fund or by affiliated parties for the reporting period.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board of Directors since the Fund last provided disclosure in response to this item.


ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-2(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective at the reasonable assurance level based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this document.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits are attached to this Form N-CSR:

 

EXHIBIT NO.

  

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

12 (b)(1)    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12 (b)(2)    Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12 (c)    Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant): Alliance California Municipal Income Fund, Inc.

 

By:  

/s/ Robert M. Keith

  Robert M. Keith
  President
Date:   June 27, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:  

/s/ Robert M. Keith

  Robert M. Keith
  President
Date:   June 27, 2016
By:  

/s/ Joseph J. Mantineo

  Joseph J. Mantineo
  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   June 27, 2016