UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-33202
UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 52-1990078 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1020 Hull Street Baltimore, Maryland 21230 |
(410) 454-6428 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) | (Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | þ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
As of July 31, 2011, there were 39,733,038 shares of Class A Common Stock and 11,822,000 shares of Class B Convertible Common Stock outstanding.
JUNE 30, 2011
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 119,684 | $203,870 | $ | 156,089 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
139,590 | 102,034 | 96,314 | |||||||||
Inventories |
311,066 | 215,355 | 179,150 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
33,983 | 19,326 | 24,658 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
17,004 | 15,265 | 11,339 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current assets |
621,327 | 555,850 | 467,550 | |||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
90,719 | 76,127 | 74,900 | |||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
3,449 | 3,914 | 4,657 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
20,225 | 21,275 | 17,993 | |||||||||
Other long term assets |
30,469 | 18,212 | 4,999 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 766,189 | $675,378 | $ | 570,099 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 118,237 | $ 84,679 | $ | 81,183 | |||||||
Accrued expenses |
44,654 | 55,138 | 30,880 | |||||||||
Current maturities of long term debt |
5,567 | 6,865 | 8,174 | |||||||||
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
| | 12 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities |
4,095 | 2,465 | 2,634 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current liabilities |
172,553 | 149,147 | 122,883 | |||||||||
Long term debt, net of current maturities |
31,290 | 9,077 | 7,406 | |||||||||
Other long term liabilities |
23,880 | 20,188 | 16,695 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities |
227,723 | 178,412 | 146,984 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 5) |
||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||
Class A Common Stock, $0.0003 1/3 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010; 39,669,162 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011, 38,660,355 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010, 38,387,401 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 |
13 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||
Class B Convertible Common Stock, $0.0003 1/3 par value; 11,875,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011, 12,500,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 |
4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
247,597 | 224,887 | 206,898 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
287,813 | 270,021 | 212,780 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
3,039 | 2,041 | 3,420 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total stockholders equity |
538,466 | 496,966 | 423,115 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 766,189 | $675,378 | $ | 570,099 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
1
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 291,336 | $ | 204,786 | $ | 604,035 | $ | 434,193 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
156,557 | 104,860 | 324,205 | 226,636 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
134,779 | 99,926 | 279,830 | 207,557 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
123,421 | 93,034 | 247,330 | 187,081 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
11,358 | 6,892 | 32,500 | 20,476 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(297 | ) | (580 | ) | (876 | ) | (1,126 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense, net |
(362 | ) | (167 | ) | (872 | ) | (852 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
10,699 | 6,145 | 30,752 | 18,498 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,458 | 2,643 | 12,372 | 7,826 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,241 | $ | 3,502 | $ | 18,380 | $ | 10,672 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income available per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
51,585 | 50,764 | 51,514 | 50,592 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
52,517 | 51,059 | 52,452 | 50,986 |
See accompanying notes.
2
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 18,380 | $ | 10,672 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
16,730 | 15,349 | ||||||
Unrealized foreign currency exchange rate (gains) losses |
(2,984 | ) | 10,142 | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
7,134 | 6,268 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
19 | 21 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
79 | (4,031 | ) | |||||
Changes in reserves and allowances |
(3,700 | ) | (2,726 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(30,938 | ) | (22,498 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(95,802 | ) | (32,084 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(7,698 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
32,788 | 13,577 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
(9,385 | ) | (3,160 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable and receivable |
(8,296 | ) | (3,640 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(83,673 | ) | (12,325 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(30,183 | ) | (15,209 | ) | ||||
Purchase of trust-owned life insurance policies |
(552 | ) | (325 | ) | ||||
Purchase of long term investment |
(3,940 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of intangible asset |
(601 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(35,276 | ) | (15,534 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from term loan |
25,000 | | ||||||
Payments on long term debt |
(4,086 | ) | (4,546 | ) | ||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
| (85 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
6,260 | 1,445 | ||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
(1,562 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other stock issuances |
9,056 | 2,310 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
34,668 | (876 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
95 | (2,473 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(84,186 | ) | (31,208 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
203,870 | 187,297 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 119,684 | $ | 156,089 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment through certain obligations |
$ | 1,656 | $ | 1,165 |
See accompanying notes.
3
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description of the Business
Under Armour, Inc. is a developer, marketer and distributor of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. These products are sold worldwide and worn by athletes at all levels, from youth to professional on playing fields around the globe, as well as by consumers with active lifestyles.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Under Armour, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the Company). Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements was condensed or omitted for the interim periods presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations were included. All intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is derived from the audited financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Form 10-K), which should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011 or any other portions thereof.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The majority of the Companys accounts receivable are due from large sporting goods retailers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customers financial condition, and generally collateral is not required. The most significant customers that accounted for a large portion of net revenues and accounts receivable were as follows:
Customer | Customer | Customer | ||||||||||
A | B | C | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2011 |
19.0 | % | 8.9 | % | 6.6 | % | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2010 |
19.8 | % | 10.0 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2011 |
25.2 | % | 11.7 | % | 8.5 | % | ||||||
As of December 31, 2010 |
23.3 | % | 11.0 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||
As of June 30, 2010 |
25.1 | % | 12.8 | % | 9.1 | % |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
As of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $3.6 million, $4.9 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company charges certain customers shipping and handling fees. These fees are recorded in net revenues. The Company includes the majority of outbound handling costs as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Outbound handling costs include costs associated with preparing goods to ship to customers and certain costs to operate the Companys distribution facilities. These costs, included within selling, general and administrative expenses, were $5.4 million and $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $10.2 million and $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company includes outbound freight costs associated with shipping goods to customers as a component of cost of goods sold.
4
Minority Investment
Beginning in January 2011, the Company has held a minority equity investment in Dome Corporation (Dome), its Japanese licensee. As of June 30, 2011, the carrying value of the Companys investment was $16.1 million, and was included in other long term assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The investment is accounted for under the cost method and is subject to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations as it is held by the Companys European subsidiary.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, including estimates relating to assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders equity. It requires an entity to present total comprehensive income, which includes the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 310,334 | $214,524 | $ | 178,235 | |||||||
Raw materials |
730 | 831 | 892 | |||||||||
Work-in-process |
2 | | 23 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 311,066 | $215,355 | $ | 179,150 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Credit Facility and Long Term Debt
Credit Facility
In March 2011, the Company entered into a new $325.0 million credit facility with certain lending institutions and terminated its prior $200.0 million revolving credit facility in order to increase the Companys available financing and to expand its lending syndicate. The credit facility has a term of four years and provides for a committed revolving credit line of up to $300.0 million, in addition to a $25.0 million term loan facility. The commitment amount under the revolving credit facility may be increased by an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions and approvals as set forth in the credit agreement. The Company incurred and capitalized $1.6 million in deferred financing costs in connection with the credit facility.
In May 2011, the Company borrowed $25.0 million under the term loan facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of part of the Companys corporate headquarters. The acquisition closed in July 2011.
The credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries (other than their trademarks and the corporate headquarters that the Company purchased in July 2011) and by a pledge of 65% of the equity interests of certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries. Up to $5.0 million of the facility may be used to support letters of credit, of which none were outstanding as of June 30, 2011. The Company is required to maintain a certain leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement. The credit agreement also provides the lenders with the ability to reduce the borrowing base, even if the Company is in compliance with all conditions of the credit agreement, upon a material adverse change to the business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions that limit the Companys ability, among other things, and subject to certain limited
5
exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge its assets as security, guaranty obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change its line of business. In addition, the credit agreement includes a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, as defined in the credit agreement, will be considered an event of default under the credit agreement.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest based on the daily balance outstanding at LIBOR (with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 1.25% to 1.75%) or, in certain cases a base rate (based on a certain lending institutions Prime Rate or as otherwise specified in the credit agreement, with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.75%). The credit facility also carries a commitment fee equal to the available but unused borrowings multiplied by an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.35%). The applicable margins are calculated quarterly and vary based on the Companys leverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement.
Upon entering into the credit facility in March 2011, the Company terminated its prior $200.0 million revolving credit facility. The prior revolving credit facility was collateralized by substantially all of the Companys assets, other than its trademarks, and included covenants, conditions and other terms similar to the Companys new credit facility.
No balances were outstanding under the current credit facility or prior revolving credit facility during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, with the exception of the $25.0 million term loan facility previously mentioned. The interest rate on the $25.0 million term loan was 1.5% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The maturity date of the $25.0 million term loan is March 2015, which is the end of the credit facility term.
Long Term Debt
The Company has long term debt agreements with various lenders to finance the acquisition or lease of qualifying capital investments. Loans under these agreements are collateralized by a first lien on the related assets acquired. As these agreements are not committed facilities, each advance is subject to approval by the lenders. Additionally, these agreements include a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, including the Companys credit facility, will be considered an event of default under these agreements. These agreements require a prepayment fee if the Company pays outstanding amounts ahead of the scheduled terms. The terms of the credit facility limit the total amount of additional financing under these agreements to $40.0 million, of which $27.1 million was remaining as of June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the outstanding principal balance under these agreements was $11.9 million, $15.9 million and $15.6 million, respectively. Currently, advances under these agreements bear interest rates which are fixed at the time of each advance. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 3.9% and 5.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 4.0% and 5.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and long term debt facilities, however instability in the credit markets could negatively impact lenders and their ability to perform under their facilities.
Interest expense was $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $0.9 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities.
5. Commitments and Contingencies
In July 2011, in connection with the acquisition of part of its corporate headquarters, the Company assumed $38.6 million in debt attached to the acquired property. The remaining purchase price was funded through a $25.0 million term loan. Refer to Note 13 for a discussion of the assumed debt and Note 4 for a discussion of the term loan.
There were no additional significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in the 2010 Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business.
6. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The fair value accounting guidance outlines a valuation framework, creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures, and prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to
6
develop its own assumptions.
Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value as of June 30, 2011 are set forth in the table below:
(In thousands) |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Derivative foreign currency forward contracts (refer to Note 8) |
$ | | $ | (1,121 | ) | $ | | |||||||
Trust owned life insurance policies (TOLI) held by the Rabbi Trust |
| 4,278 | | |||||||||||
Deferred Compensation Plan obligations |
| (3,664 | ) | |
Fair values of the financial assets and liabilities listed above are determined using inputs that use as their basis readily observable market data that are actively quoted and are validated through external sources, including third-party pricing services and brokers. The foreign currency forward contracts represent gains and losses on derivative contracts, which are the net difference between the currency to be received or paid at each contracts settlement date and the value of the foreign currency to be sold or purchased at the current forward exchange rate. The fair value of the TOLI held by the Rabbi Trust is based on the cash-surrender value of the life insurance policies, which are invested primarily in mutual funds and a separately managed fixed income fund. These investments are in the same funds and purchased in substantially the same amounts as the selected investments of participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan, which represent the underlying liabilities to participants in this plan. Obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan are recorded at amounts due to participants, based on the fair value of participants selected investments.
7. Stock-Based Compensation
In February 2011, 0.3 million performance-based restricted stock units were awarded to certain executives and key employees under the 2005 Plan. The performance-based restricted stock units have vesting that is tied to the achievement of a certain combined annual operating income target for 2012 and 2013. Upon the achievement of the combined operating income target, 50% of the restricted stock units will vest on February 15, 2014 and the remaining 50% will vest on February 15, 2015. If certain lower levels of combined operating income for 2012 and 2013 are achieved, fewer or no restricted stock units will vest at that time and one year later, and the remaining restricted stock units will be forfeited. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had not begun recording stock-based compensation expense for these performance-based restricted stock units as the Company determined the achievement of the combined operating income targets was not probable. The Company will assess the probability of the achievement of the operating income targets at the end of each reporting period. If it becomes probable that the performance targets related to these performance-based restricted stock units will be achieved, a cumulative adjustment will be recorded as if ratable stock-based compensation expense had been recorded since the grant date. Additional stock based compensation of up to $2.6 million would have been recorded through June 30, 2011 for these performance-based restricted stock units had the achievement of these operating income targets been deemed probable.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had not begun recording stock-based compensation expense for a portion of the performance-based stock options granted during 2010 as the Company determined the achievement of certain combined operating income targets for 2011 and 2012 was not probable. Additional stock-based compensation of up to $2.1 million would have been recorded at June 30, 2011 had the achievement of these operating income targets been deemed probable.
8. Foreign Currency Risk Management and Derivatives
The Company is exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relating to transactions generated by its international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies. These gains and losses are primarily driven by intercompany transactions. From time to time, the Company may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for its European and Canadian subsidiaries. In addition, the Company may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on Pound Sterling denominated balance sheet items.
As of June 30, 2011, the notional value of the Companys outstanding foreign currency forward contract used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on its Canadian subsidiarys intercompany transactions was $23.0 million with a contract maturity of 1 month. As of June 30, 2011, the notional value of the Companys outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on its European subsidiarys intercompany transactions was $45.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month. As of June 30, 2011, the notional value of the Companys outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on Pounds Sterling denominated balance sheet items was $4.8 million with contract maturities of 1 month. The foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges, and accordingly, changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense, net. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values of the Companys foreign
7
currency forward contracts were liabilities of $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2010, the fair values of the Companys foreign currency forward contracts were assets of $0.6 million, and were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note 6 for a discussion of the fair value measurements. Included in other expense, net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses) |
$ | 1,062 | $ | (6,652 | ) | $ | 2,984 | $ | (10,142 | ) | ||||||
Realized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses) |
(133 | ) | 689 | 322 | 782 | |||||||||||
Unrealized derivative gains (losses) |
(520 | ) | 944 | (505 | ) | 307 | ||||||||||
Realized derivative gains (losses) |
(771 | ) | 4,852 | (3,673 | ) | 8,201 |
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions. This credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts. However, the Company monitors the credit quality of these financial institutions and considers the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
9. Provision for Income Taxes
The Company recorded $4.5 million and $2.6 million of income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $12.4 million and $7.8 million of income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective rates for income taxes were 40.2% and 42.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was lower than the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to decreased losses in foreign subsidiaries, federal tax credits forecasted in 2011 which were not forecasted during the second quarter of 2010 and a reduction in the portion of income subject to state taxes. The Companys annual 2011 effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 40.0%.
10. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income by period is stated below:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,241 | $ | 3,502 | $ | 18,380 | $ | 10,672 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||
Changes in cumulative translation adjustment |
332 | 1,823 | 998 | 2,956 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 6,573 | $ | 5,325 | $ | 19,378 | $ | 13,628 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
11. Earnings per Share
The following represents a reconciliation from basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Numerator |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,241 | $ | 3,502 | $ | 18,380 | $ | 10,672 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to participating securities |
(44 | ) | (32 | ) | (147 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders (1) |
$ | 6,197 | $ | 3,470 | $ | 18,233 | $ | 10,576 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
51,211 | 50,320 | 51,086 | 50,153 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
932 | 295 | 938 | 394 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average common shares and dilutive securities outstanding |
52,143 | 50,615 | 52,024 | 50,547 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share - basic |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
Earnings per share - diluted |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
(1) Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
51,211 | 50,320 | 51,086 | 50,153 | ||||||||||||
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding and participating securities |
51,585 | 50,764 | 51,514 | 50,592 | ||||||||||||
Percentage allocated to common stockholders |
99.3 | % | 99.1 | % | 99.2 | % | 99.1 | % |
Effects of potentially dilutive securities are presented only in periods in which they are dilutive. Stock options and restricted stock units representing 47.5 thousand and 82.0 thousand shares of common stock outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Stock options, restricted stock units and warrants representing 1.3 million shares of common stock outstanding for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
12. Segment Data and Related Information
The Companys operating segments are based on how the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance. As such, the CODM receives discrete financial information by geographic region based on the Companys strategy to become a global brand. These geographic regions include North America; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA); and Asia. The Companys operating segments are based on these geographic regions. Each geographic segment operates exclusively in one industry: the development, marketing and distribution of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. Due to the insignificance of the EMEA, Latin America and Asia operating segments, they have been combined into other foreign countries for disclosure purposes.
The geographic distribution of the Companys net revenues, operating income and total assets are summarized in the following tables based on the location of its customers and operations. Net revenues represent sales to external customers for each segment. In addition to net revenues, operating income is a primary financial measure used by the Company to evaluate performance of each segment. Intercompany balances were eliminated for separate disclosure and corporate expenses from North America have not been allocated to other foreign countries.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 277,442 | $ | 196,008 | $ | 573,519 | $ | 411,766 | ||||||||
Other foreign countries |
13,894 | 8,778 | 30,516 | 22,427 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 291,336 | $ | 204,786 | $ | 604,035 | $ | 434,193 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 12,656 | $ | 6,211 | $ | 31,211 | $ | 18,974 | ||||||||
Other foreign countries |
(1,298 | ) | 681 | 1,289 | 1,502 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating income |
11,358 | 6,892 | 32,500 | 20,476 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(297 | ) | (580 | ) | (876 | ) | (1,126 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense, net |
(362 | ) | (167 | ) | (872 | ) | (852 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 10,699 | $ | 6,145 | $ | 30,752 | $ | 18,498 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||
Total assets |
||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 703,171 | $613,515 | $ | 529,268 | |||||||
Other foreign countries |
63,018 | 61,863 | 40,831 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 766,189 | $675,378 | $ | 570,099 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues by product category are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Apparel |
$ | 204,779 | $ | 150,205 | $ | 435,263 | $ | 322,841 | ||||||||
Footwear |
46,885 | 35,820 | 98,321 | 78,778 | ||||||||||||
Accessories |
32,393 | 8,857 | 55,930 | 16,375 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net sales |
284,057 | 194,882 | 589,514 | 417,994 | ||||||||||||
License revenues |
7,279 | 9,904 | 14,521 | 16,199 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 291,336 | $ | 204,786 | $ | 604,035 | $ | 434,193 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Subsequent Event
The Company previously disclosed its intent to acquire approximately 400.0 thousand square feet of office space comprising part of its current corporate headquarters. In July 2011, the Company closed this acquisition for $62.6 million, which included the closing costs of the transaction and the acquisition of buildings, building equipment and improvements, as well as the assumption of third-party leases currently in place. Prior to the acquisition, the Company leased approximately 170.0 thousand square feet of the acquired space. The Company intends to use this space for future expansion of its corporate headquarters. In connection with the acquisition, the Company assumed $38.6 million in debt attached to the acquired property. The assumed debt has an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of March 1, 2013. The debt requires a balloon payment of $37.3 million at maturity. The debt has an interest rate of 6.73% and may not be prepaid. The remaining purchase price was funded through a $25.0 million term loan. Refer to Note 4 for a discussion of the term loan.
10
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein by reference (if any) constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts, such as statements regarding our future financial condition or results of operations, our prospects and strategies for future growth, the development and introduction of new products, and the implementation of our marketing and branding strategies. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, outlook, potential, the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein by reference (if any) reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause events or our actual activities or results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (our 2010 Form 10-K) or in this Form 10-Q under Risk Factors, if included herein, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A). These factors include without limitation:
| changes in general economic or market conditions that could affect consumer spending and the financial health of our retail customers; |
| our ability to effectively manage our growth and a more complex business; |
| our ability to effectively develop and launch new, innovative and updated products; |
| our ability to accurately forecast consumer demand for our products and manage our inventory in response to changing demands; |
| increased competition causing us to reduce the prices of our products or to increase significantly our marketing efforts in order to avoid losing market share; |
| fluctuations in the costs of our products; |
| loss of key suppliers or manufacturers or failure of our suppliers or manufacturers to produce or deliver our products in a timely or cost-effective manner; |
| changes in consumer preferences or the reduction in demand for performance apparel, footwear and other products; |
| our ability to accurately anticipate and respond to seasonal or quarterly fluctuations in our operating results; |
| our ability to effectively market and maintain a positive brand image; |
| the availability, integration and effective operation of management information systems and other technology; and |
| our ability to attract and maintain the services of our senior management and key employees. |
The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q reflect our views and assumptions only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
We are a leading developer, marketer and distributor of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. The brands moisture-wicking fabrications are engineered in many different designs and styles for wear in nearly every climate to provide a performance alternative to traditional products. Our products are sold worldwide and worn by athletes at all levels, from youth to professional, on playing fields around the globe, as well as by consumers with active lifestyles.
11
We are a growth company as evidenced by the increase in net revenues to $1,063.9 million in 2010 from $430.7 million in 2006. We reported net revenues of $604.0 million for the first six months of 2011, which represented a 39.1% increase from the first six months of 2010. We believe that our growth in net revenues has been driven by a growing interest in performance products and the strength of the Under Armour brand in the marketplace. We plan to continue to increase our net revenues over the long term by increased sales of our apparel, footwear and accessories, expansion of our wholesale distribution sales channel, growth in our direct to consumer sales channel and expansion in international markets. Our direct to consumer sales channel includes our factory house and specialty stores, website and catalog. New offerings for 2011 include hats and bags, as well as performance-based cotton products.
Our products are currently offered in over twenty four thousand retail stores worldwide. A large majority of our products are sold in North America; however we believe our products appeal to athletes and consumers with active lifestyles around the globe. Outside of North America, our products are offered primarily in Austria, France, Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom, as well as in Japan through a licensee, and through distributors located in other foreign countries. We hold a minority investment in our licensee in Japan.
Our operating segments are geographic and include North America; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA); and Asia. Due to the insignificance of the EMEA, Latin America and Asia operating segments, they have been combined into other foreign countries for disclosure purposes.
General
Net revenues comprise both net sales and license revenues. Net sales comprise sales from our primary product categories, which are apparel, footwear and accessories. Our license revenues consist of fees paid to us by our licensees in exchange for the use of our trademarks on core products of socks, eyewear, custom-molded mouth guards, other accessories and team uniforms, as well as the distribution of our products in Japan. Prior to 2011, hats and bags were sold by a licensee. We expect our net revenues to increase by approximately $70 million from 2010 to 2011 as a result of developing our own hats and bags, which includes an increase in accessories revenues and a decrease in our license revenues in 2011. In addition, we expect the related cost of goods sold to increase.
Cost of goods sold consists primarily of product costs, inbound freight and duty costs, outbound freight costs, handling costs to make products floor-ready to customer specifications, royalty payments to endorsers based on a predetermined percentage of sales of selected products and write downs for inventory obsolescence. The fabrics in many of our products are made of petroleum-based synthetic materials. Therefore our product costs, as well as our inbound and outbound freight costs, could be affected by long term pricing trends of oil. In general, as a percentage of net revenues, we expect cost of goods sold associated with our apparel and accessories to be lower than that of our footwear. No cost of goods sold is associated with license revenues.
We include outbound freight costs associated with shipping goods to customers as cost of goods sold; however, we include the majority of outbound handling costs as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. As a result, our gross profit may not be comparable to that of other companies that include outbound handling costs in their cost of goods sold. Outbound handling costs include costs associated with preparing goods to ship to customers and certain costs to operate our distribution facilities. These costs were $5.4 million and $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $10.2 million and $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist of costs related to marketing, selling, product innovation and supply chain and corporate services. Personnel costs are included in these categories based on the employees function. Personnel costs include salaries, benefits, incentives and stock-based compensation related to the employee. Our marketing costs are an important driver of our growth. Marketing costs consist primarily of commercials, print ads, league, team, player and event sponsorships, amortization of footwear promotional rights and depreciation expense specific to our in-store fixture program. In addition, marketing costs include costs associated with our Special Make-Up Shop (SMU Shop) located at one of our distribution facilities where we manufacture a limited number of products primarily for our league, team, player and event sponsorships. Selling costs consist primarily of costs relating to sales through our wholesale channel, commissions paid to third parties and the majority of our direct to consumer sales channel costs, including the cost of factory house and specialty store leases. Product innovation and supply chain costs include our apparel, footwear and accessories product innovation, sourcing and development costs, distribution facility operating costs, and costs relating to our Hong Kong and Guangzhou, China offices which help support manufacturing, quality assurance and sourcing efforts. Corporate services primarily consist of corporate facility operating costs and company-wide administrative expenses.
Other expense, net consists of unrealized and realized gains and losses on our derivative financial instruments and unrealized and realized gains and losses on adjustments that arise from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relating to transactions generated by our international subsidiaries.
12
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of net revenues:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 291,336 | $ | 204,786 | $ | 604,035 | $ | 434,193 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
156,557 | 104,860 | 324,205 | 226,636 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
134,779 | 99,926 | 279,830 | 207,557 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
123,421 | 93,034 | 247,330 | 187,081 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
11,358 | 6,892 | 32,500 | 20,476 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(297 | ) | (580 | ) | (876 | ) | (1,126 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense, net |
(362 | ) | (167 | ) | (872 | ) | (852 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
10,699 | 6,145 | 30,752 | 18,498 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,458 | 2,643 | 12,372 | 7,826 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,241 | $ | 3,502 | $ | 18,380 | $ | 10,672 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(As a percentage of net revenues) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
53.7 | 51.2 | 53.7 | 52.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
46.3 | 48.8 | 46.3 | 47.8 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
42.4 | 45.4 | 40.9 | 43.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
3.9 | 3.4 | 5.4 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(0.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense, net |
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
3.7 | 3.0 | 5.1 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1.6 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
2.1 | % | 1.7 | % | 3.0 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net revenues increased $86.5 million, or 42.3%, to $291.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $204.8 million for the same period in 2010. Net revenues by product category are summarized below:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Apparel |
$ | 204,779 | $ | 150,205 | $ | 54,574 | 36.3 | % | ||||||||
Footwear |
46,885 | 35,820 | 11,065 | 30.9 | ||||||||||||
Accessories |
32,393 | 8,857 | 23,536 | 265.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net sales |
284,057 | 194,882 | 89,175 | 45.8 | ||||||||||||
License revenues |
7,279 | 9,904 | (2,625 | ) | (26.5 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 291,336 | $ | 204,786 | $ | 86,550 | 42.3 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $89.2 million, or 45.8%, to $284.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $194.9 million during the same period in 2010 as noted in the table above. The increase in net sales primarily reflects:
| $35.2 million, or 80.7%, increase in direct to consumer sales, which includes 27 additional stores, or a 60% increase, since June 30, 2010; |
13
| unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories, most significantly in our training (including the new performance-based cotton product), graphics, base layer, golf and running categories, along with running shoes; and |
| $20.6 million, or 333.2%, increase in wholesale accessories sales due to bringing hats and bags sales in-house effective January 1, 2011. |
License revenues decreased $2.6 million, or 26.5%, to $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $9.9 million during the same period in 2010. This decrease in license revenues was a result of reduced license revenues due to bringing hats and bags sales in-house and decreased license revenues from Dome, our Japanese licensee, due to the recent earthquake and tsunami. These decreases were partially offset by increased sales by our other licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth.
Gross profit increased $34.9 million to $134.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $99.9 million for the same period in 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues, or gross margin, decreased 250 basis points to 46.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 48.8% during the same period in 2010. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following:
| decrease in license revenues due to bringing hats and bags sales in-house effective January 1, 2011 and decreases in Japanese license revenues due to the recent earthquake and tsunami, accounting for an approximate 120 basis point decrease; |
| less favorable apparel product mix and input costs, accounting for an approximate 120 basis point decrease; and |
| increased apparel sales allowances, accounting for an approximate 40 basis point decrease; partially offset by |
| increased direct to consumer higher margin sales, accounting for an approximate 45 basis point increase. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $30.4 million to $123.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $93.0 million for the same period in 2010. As a percentage of net revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 42.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 45.4% for the same period in 2010. These changes were primarily attributable to the following:
| Marketing costs increased $6.7 million to $34.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $27.4 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to increased sponsorships of professional teams and athletes and increased television and digital campaign costs, including media campaigns for specific customers. As a percentage of net revenues, marketing costs decreased to 11.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 13.4% for the same period in 2010 primarily due to the increase in net revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. |
| Selling costs increased $9.5 million to $30.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $21.2 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and higher selling personnel costs. As a percentage of net revenues, selling costs increased slightly to 10.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 10.4% for the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our factory house stores, partially offset by the increase in net revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. |
| Product innovation and supply chain costs increased $8.9 million to $31.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $22.2 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher distribution facilities operating and personnel costs to support our growth in net revenues and higher personnel costs for the design and sourcing of our expanding apparel, footwear and accessory lines. As a percentage of net revenues, product innovation and supply chain costs decreased slightly to 10.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 10.8% for the same period in 2010 due to the increase in net revenues, partially offset by higher distribution facilities costs as a percentage of net revenues. |
| Corporate services costs increased $5.3 million to $27.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $22.2 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was attributable primarily to higher corporate personnel and facility costs and information technology initiatives necessary to support our growth. As a percentage of net revenues, corporate services costs decreased to 9.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 10.8% for the same period in 2010 primarily due to increase in net revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. |
Income from operations increased $4.5 million, or 64.8%, to $11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $6.9 million for the same period in 2010. Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues increased to 3.9% for
14
the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 3.4% for the same period in 2010. This increase was a result of the items discussed above.
Interest expense, net decreased $0.3 million to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $0.6 million for the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to lower average balances on our long term debt facilities.
Other expense, net increased $0.2 million to $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $0.2 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in foreign currencies and our derivative financial instruments as compared to the same period in 2010.
Provision for income taxes increased $1.9 million to $4.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $2.6 million during the same period in 2010. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our effective tax rate was 41.7% compared to 43.0% for the same period in 2010. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was lower than the effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to decreased losses in foreign subsidiaries, federal tax credits forecasted in 2011 which were not forecasted during the first and second quarters of 2010 and a reduction in the portion of income subject to state taxes.
Our annual 2011 effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 40.0%. In addition, we are pursuing certain tax incentives that, if realized in the third or fourth quarter of this year, could reduce the projected 2011 effective tax rate.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net revenues increased $169.8 million, or 39.1%, to $604.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $434.2 million for the same period in 2010. Net revenues by product category are summarized below:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Apparel |
$ | 435,263 | $ | 322,841 | $ | 112,422 | 34.8 | % | ||||||||
Footwear |
98,321 | 78,778 | 19,543 | 24.8 | ||||||||||||
Accessories |
55,930 | 16,375 | 39,555 | 241.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net sales |
589,514 | 417,994 | 171,520 | 41.0 | ||||||||||||
License revenues |
14,521 | 16,199 | (1,678 | ) | (10.4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 604,035 | $ | 434,193 | $ | 169,842 | 39.1 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $171.5 million, or 41.0%, to $589.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $418.0 million during the same period in 2010 as noted in the table above. The increase in net sales primarily reflects:
| $57.2 million, or 67.1%, increase in direct to consumer sales, which includes 27 additional stores, or a 60% increase, since June 30, 2010; |
| unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories, most significantly in our training (including the new performance-based cotton product), graphics, base layer, golf and running categories; and |
| $35.2 million, or 331.7%, increase in wholesale accessories sales due to bringing hats and bags sales in-house effective January 1, 2011. |
License revenues decreased $1.7 million, or 10.4%, to $14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $16.2 million during the same period in 2010. This decrease was a result of a reduction in license revenues due to bringing hats and bags sales in-house, partially offset by increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth.
Gross profit increased $72.2 million to $279.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $207.6 million for the same period in 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues, or gross margin, decreased 150 basis points to 46.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 47.8% during the same period in 2010. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following:
| less favorable apparel product mix, input costs and sales allowances, accounting for an approximate 115 basis point decrease; and |
15
| decrease in license revenues due to bringing hats and bags sales in-house effective January 1, 2011 and decreases in Japanese license revenues due to the recent earthquake and tsunami, accounting for an approximate 70 basis point decrease; partially offset by |
| increased direct to consumer higher margin sales, accounting for an approximate 25 basis point increase; and |
| decreased footwear markdown reserves, accounting for an approximate 20 basis point increase. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $60.2 million to $247.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $187.1 million for the same period in 2010. As a percentage of net revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 40.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 43.1% for the same period in 2010. These changes were primarily attributable to the following:
| Marketing costs increased $17.0 million to $75.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $58.6 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to increased sponsorships of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes; increased television and digital campaign costs, including media campaigns for specific customers; and additional personnel costs. As a percentage of net revenues, marketing costs decreased to 12.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 13.5% for the same period in 2010 primarily due to decreased sponsorships of collegiate and professional teams and decreased marketing costs for specific customers as a percentage of net revenues. |
| Selling costs increased $17.6 million to $58.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $40.9 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and higher selling personnel costs. As a percentage of net revenues, selling costs increased to 9.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 9.4% for the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our factory house stores. |
| Product innovation and supply chain costs increased $16.1 million to $60.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $44.2 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher distribution facilities operating and personnel costs to support our growth in net revenues and higher personnel costs for the design and sourcing of our expanding apparel, footwear and accessory lines. As a percentage of net revenues, product innovation and supply chain costs decreased to 10.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 10.2% for the same period in 2010 due to decreased distribution facilities personnel costs as a percentage of net revenues. |
| Corporate services costs increased $9.5 million to $52.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $43.4 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was attributable primarily to higher corporate personnel and facility costs and information technology initiatives necessary to support our growth. As a percentage of net revenues, corporate services costs decreased to 8.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 10.0% for the same period in 2010 primarily due to decreased corporate personnel and facility costs as a percentage of net revenues. |
Income from operations increased $12.0 million, or 58.7%, to $32.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $20.5 million for the same period in 2010. Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues increased to 5.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 4.7% for the same period in 2010. This increase was a result of the items discussed above.
Interest expense, net decreased $0.2 million to $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.1 million for the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to lower average balances on our long term debt facilities.
Other expense, net remained unchanged at $0.9 million for the six months ending June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Provision for income taxes increased $4.6 million to $12.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $7.8 million during the same period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our effective tax rate was 40.2% compared to 42.3% for the same period in 2010. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was lower than the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to decreased losses in foreign subsidiaries, federal tax credits forecasted in 2011 which were not forecasted during the first and second quarters of 2010 and a reduction in the portion of income subject to state taxes.
Our annual 2011 effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 40.0%. In addition, we are pursuing certain tax incentives that, if realized in the third or fourth quarter of this year, could reduce the projected 2011 effective tax rate.
16
Segment Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net revenues by geographic region are summarized below:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 277,442 | $ | 196,008 | $ | 81,434 | 41.5 | % | ||||||||
Other foreign countries |
13,894 | 8,778 | 5,116 | 58.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 291,336 | $ | 204,786 | $ | 86,550 | 42.3 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues in North America increased $81.4 million to $277.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $196.0 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations. Net revenues in other foreign countries increased by $5.1 million to $13.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $8.8 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to increased unit sales in our EMEA operating segment as well as unit sales growth to our distributors in our Asia and Latin America operating segments, partially offset by decreased product distribution and associated license revenues by our licensee in Japan due to the recent earthquake and tsunami.
Operating income (loss) by geographic region is summarized below:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 12,656 | $ | 6,211 | $ | 6,445 | 103.8 | % | ||||||||
Other foreign countries |
(1,298 | ) | 681 | (1,979 | ) | (290.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 11,358 | $ | 6,892 | $ | 4,466 | 64.8 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income in North America increased $6.5 million to $12.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $6.2 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations. Operating loss in other foreign countries was $1.3 million, a decrease of $2.0 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from operating income of $0.7 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to decreased product distribution and associated higher margin license revenues by our licensee in Japan due to the recent earthquake and tsunami and increased costs associated with our continued investment to support our international expansion in Asia and Latin America.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net revenues by geographic region are summarized below:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 573,519 | $ | 411,766 | $ | 161,753 | 39.3 | % | ||||||||
Other foreign countries |
30,516 | 22,427 | 8,089 | 36.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 604,035 | $ | 434,193 | $ | 169,842 | 39.1 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues in North America increased $161.7 million to $573.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $411.8 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations. Net revenues in other foreign countries increased by $8.1 million to $30.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $22.4 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to unit sales growth in our EMEA operating segment as well as unit sales growth to our distributors in our Asia and Latin America operating segments.
Operating income by geographic region is summarized below:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 31,211 | $ | 18,974 | $ | 12,237 | 64.5 | % | ||||||||
Other foreign countries |
1,289 | 1,502 | (213 | ) | (14.2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 32,500 | $ | 20,476 | $ | 12,024 | 58.7 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Operating income in North America increased $12.1 million to $31.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $19.0 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to the items discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations. Operating income in other foreign countries decreased by $0.2 million to $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.5 million for the same period in 2010 primarily due to increased costs related to our continued investment to support our international expansion in Asia and Latin America, partially offset by increased unit sales growth by our distributors in our Asia and EMEA operating segments and increased product distribution and associated higher margin license revenues by our licensee in Japan.
Seasonality
Historically, we have recognized a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year, driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season, reflecting our historical strength in fall sports, and the seasonality of our higher priced COLDGEAR® line. Historically, a larger portion of our income from operations has been in the last two quarters of the year partially due to the shift in the timing of marketing investments to the first two quarters of the year. The majority of our net revenues were generated during the last two quarters in each of 2010 and 2009. The level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business.
Financial Position, Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our cash requirements have principally been for working capital and capital expenditures. Working capital is primarily funded from cash flows provided by operating activities and cash and cash equivalents on hand. Our working capital requirements generally reflect the seasonality and growth in our business as we recognize the majority of our net revenues in the back half of the year. We fund our working capital, primarily inventory, and capital investments from cash flows provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents on hand and borrowings primarily available under our long term debt facilities. Our capital investments have included expanding our in-store fixture and branded concept shop program, improvements and expansion of our distribution and corporate facilities to support our growth, leasehold improvements to our new factory house and specialty stores, and investment and improvements in information technology systems. Our capital expenditures in 2011 will also include the acquisition of part of our corporate headquarters for $62.6 million along with approximately $2.4 million in additional related investments and improvements. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed $38.6 million of debt attached to the acquired property. The remaining purchase price was funded through a $25.0 million term loan.
Our focus remains on inventory management including improving our planning capabilities, managing our inventory purchases, reducing our production lead times and selling excess inventory through our factory house stores and other liquidation channels. However, several factors contributed to inventory growth in excess of net revenue growth in the first half of 2011. We increased our safety stock in core product offerings, primarily our Cold Gear products, and seasonal products to better meet anticipated consumer demand. Core product offerings are products that we generally plan to have available for sale for at least the next twelve months at full price. In addition, beginning in 2011, hats and bags are sold by us rather than by one of our licensees, which also contributed to our expected year over year inventory growth. We expect the inventory growth rate to be more in line with net revenue growth in the third and fourth quarters of 2011.
We believe our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash from operations and borrowings available to us under our credit and long term debt facilities will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. We may require additional capital to meet our longer term liquidity and future growth needs. Although we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity over the long term, a prolonged economic recession or a slow recovery could adversely affect our business and liquidity. In addition, instability in or tightening of the capital markets could adversely affect our ability to obtain additional capital to grow our business and will affect the cost and terms of such capital.
18
Cash Flows
The following table presents the major components of net cash flows provided by and used in operating, investing and financing activities for the periods presented:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | (83,673 | ) | $ | (12,325 | ) | ||
Investing activities |
(35,276 | ) | (15,534 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
34,668 | (876 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
95 | (2,473 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (84,186 | ) | $ | (31,208 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items. Adjustments to net income for non-cash items include depreciation and amortization, unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains and losses, losses on disposals of property and equipment, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxes and changes in reserves and allowances. In addition, operating cash flows include the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities, principally inventories, accounts receivable, income taxes payable and receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Cash used in operating activities increased $71.4 million to $83.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $12.3 million during the same period in 2010. The increase in cash used in operating activities was due to increased net cash outflows from operating assets and liabilities of $71.3 million and adjustments to net income for non-cash items which decreased $7.8 million period over period, partially offset by additional net income of $7.7 million. The increase in cash outflows related to changes in operating assets and liabilities period over period was primarily driven by an increase in inventory investments of $63.7 million. In line with our expectations, inventory grew in the second quarter of 2011 at a rate higher than net revenue growth due to increased safety stock in core product offerings and seasonal products to better meet anticipated consumer demand and investments in new products including hats and bags.
Adjustments to net income for non-cash items decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period of the prior year primarily due to unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains in the 2011 period as compared to unrealized foreign currency exchange rate losses in the prior period.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities, which includes capital expenditures and the purchase of trust owned life insurance policies, increased $19.8 million to $35.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $15.5 million for the same period in 2010. This increase in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to increased investments in our direct to consumer sales channel, corporate and distribution facilities and our in-store fixture program. In addition, we invested in Dome Corporation, our Japanese licensee.
Capital expenditures for the full year 2011 are anticipated to be in the high end of our previously indicated range of $45.0 million to $50.0 million. Our capital expenditures in 2011 will also include the acquisition of part of our corporate headquarters for $62.6 million along with approximately $2.4 million in additional related investments and improvements. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed $38.6 million in debt attached to the acquired property. The remaining purchase price was funded through a $25.0 million term loan.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities increased $35.6 million to $34.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from cash used in financing activities of $0.9 million for the same period in 2010. This increase from the prior year period was primarily due to the term loan borrowed under the credit facility to partially fund the purchase of our corporate headquarters. In addition, we received higher proceeds from the exercise of stock options and additional excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements in the 2011 period as compared to the 2010 period.
19
Credit Facility
In March 2011, we entered into a new $325.0 million credit facility with certain lending institutions and terminated our prior $200.0 million revolving credit facility in order to increase our available financing and to expand our lending syndicate.The credit facility has a term of four years and provides for a committed revolving credit line of up to $300.0 million in addition to a $25.0 million term loan facility. The commitment amount under the revolving credit facility may be increased by an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions and approvals as set forth in the credit agreement. We incurred and capitalized $1.6 million in deferred financing costs in connection with the credit facility.
In May 2011, we borrowed $25.0 million under the term loan facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of part of our corporate headquarters. The acquisition closed in July 2011.
The credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and is collateralized by substantially all of our assets and certain of our domestic subsidiaries (other than our trademarks and the corporate headquarters that we purchased in July 2011) and by a pledge of 65% of the equity interests of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. Up to $5.0 million of the facility may be used to support letters of credit, of which none were outstanding as of June 30, 2011. We are required to maintain a certain leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement. The credit agreement also provides the lenders with the ability to reduce the borrowing base, even if we are in compliance with all conditions of the credit agreement, upon a material adverse change to our business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions that limit our ability, among other things, and subject to certain limited exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge our assets as security, guaranty obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change our line of business. In addition, the credit agreement includes a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, as defined in the credit agreement, will be considered an event of default under the credit agreement.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest based on the daily balance outstanding at LIBOR (with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 1.25% to 1.75%) or, in certain cases a base rate (based on a certain lending institutions Prime Rate or as otherwise specified in the credit agreement, with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.75%). The credit facility also carries a commitment fee equal to the available but unused borrowings multiplied by an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.35%). The applicable margins are calculated quarterly and vary based on our leverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement.
Upon entering into the credit facility in March 2011, we terminated our prior $200.0 million revolving credit facility. The prior revolving credit facility was collateralized by substantially all of our assets, other than our trademarks, and included covenants, conditions and other terms similar to our new credit facility.
No balances were outstanding under the current credit facility or prior revolving credit facility during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, with the exception of the $25.0 million term loan facility previously mentioned. The interest rate on the $25.0 million term loan was 1.5% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The maturity date of the $25.0 million term loan is March 2015, which is the end of the credit facility term.
Long Term Debt
We have long term debt agreements with various lenders to finance the acquisition of or lease of qualifying capital investments. Loans under these agreements are collateralized by a first lien on the related assets acquired. As these agreements are not committed facilities, each advance is subject to approval by the lenders. Additionally, these agreements include a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, including our credit facility, will be considered an event of default under these agreements. In addition, these agreements require a prepayment fee if we pay outstanding amounts ahead of the scheduled terms. The terms of our credit facility limit the total amount of additional financing under these agreements to $40.0 million, of which $27.1 million was remaining as of June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the outstanding principal balances under these agreements were $11.9 million, $15.9 million and $15.6 million, respectively. Currently, advances under these agreements bear interest rates which are fixed at the time of each advance. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 3.9% and 5.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 4.0% and 5.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We monitor the financial health and stability of our lenders under our credit and long term debt facilities, however instability in the credit markets could negatively impact lenders and their ability to perform under these facilities.
Contractual Commitments and Contingencies
In July 2011, in connection with the acquisition of part of our corporate headquarters, we assumed $38.6 million in debt attached to the acquired property. The remaining purchase price was funded through a $25.0 million term loan. Refer
20
to Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the assumed debt and Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements for a further discussion on the term loan.
There were no additional significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in our 2010 Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. To prepare these financial statements, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could be significantly different from these estimates. We believe the following discussion addresses the critical accounting policies that are necessary to understand and evaluate our reported financial results.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2010 Form 10-K. The SEC suggests companies provide additional disclosure on those accounting policies considered most critical. The SEC considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to our financial condition and results of operations and requires significant judgments and estimates on the part of management in its application. Our estimates are often based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions that management believes to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. It is also possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a range of alternative estimated amounts. For a complete discussion of our critical accounting policies, see the Critical Accounting Policies section of the MD&A in our 2010 Form 10-K. There were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders equity. It requires an entity to present total comprehensive income, which includes the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We believe the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange and Foreign Currency Risk Management and Derivatives
We currently generate a small amount of our consolidated net revenues in Canada and Europe. The reporting currency for our consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar. To date, net revenues generated outside of the United States have not been significant. However, as our net revenues generated outside of the United States increase, our results of operations could be adversely impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. For example, if we recognize foreign revenues in local foreign currencies (as we currently do in Canada and Europe) and if the U.S. dollar strengthens, it could have a negative impact on our foreign revenues upon translation of those results into the U.S. dollar upon consolidation of our financial statements. In addition, we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our foreign subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies. These gains and losses are primarily driven by intercompany transactions. These exposures are included in other expense, net on the consolidated statements of income.
From time to time, we may elect to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for our European and Canadian subsidiaries. In addition, we may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on Pound Sterling denominated balance sheet items. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2011, we receive US Dollars in exchange for Canadian Dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 0.98 CAD per $1.00, US Dollars in exchange for Euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 EUR per $1.00 and Euros in exchange for Pounds Sterling at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.90 GBP per 1.00 EUR. As of June 30, 2011, the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our Canadian subsidiary was $23.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month, and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency
21
forward contracts for our European subsidiary was $45.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month. As of June 30, 2011, the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on Pound Sterling denominated balance sheet items was $4.8 million with contract maturities of 1 month. The foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges, and accordingly, changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense, net on the consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2010, the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were assets of $0.6 million, and were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the fair value measurements. Included in other expense, net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses) |
$ | 1,062 | $ | (6,652 | ) | $ | 2,984 | $ | (10,142 | ) | ||||||
Realized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses) |
(133 | ) | 689 | 322 | 782 | |||||||||||
Unrealized derivative gains (losses) |
(520 | ) | 944 | (505 | ) | 307 | ||||||||||
Realized derivative gains (losses) |
(771 | ) | 4,852 | (3,673 | ) | 8,201 |
Although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows, we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
22
The Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2010 have not materially changed.
Exhibit |
||
10.01 | Third Amendment to the Office Lease by and between Hull Point LLC and the Company dated June 23, 2004 (portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment) (re-filing previously filed exhibit to include all exhibits, schedules and attachments). | |
10.02 | Sixth Amendment to the Office Lease by and between Hull Point LLC and the Company dated May 1, 2007 (portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment) (re-filing previously filed exhibit to include all exhibits, schedules and attachments). | |
10.03 | Credit Agreement among PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent, Compass Bank, as Documentation Agent, and the Lenders that are party thereto and the Company dated January 28, 2009 (re-filing previously filed exhibit to include all exhibits, schedules and attachments). | |
10.04 | Credit Agreement among PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and the Lenders and the Guarantors that are party thereto and the Company dated March 29, 2011 (re-filing previously filed exhibit to include all exhibits, schedules and attachments). | |
10.05 | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (re-filing exhibit under the correct description; exhibit was erroneously filed with Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010). | |
10.06 | Form of Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement under the Under Armour, Inc. 2010 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (re-filing exhibit under the correct description; exhibit was erroneously filed with Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010). | |
31.01 | Section 302 Chief Executive Officer Certification. | |
31.02 | Section 302 Chief Financial Officer Certification. | |
32.01 | Section 906 Chief Executive Officer Certification. | |
32.02 | Section 906 Chief Financial Officer Certification. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
23
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNDER ARMOUR, INC. | ||||
Date: August 4, 2011 |
By: | /S/ BRAD DICKERSON | ||
Brad Dickerson Chief Financial Officer |
24