UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-33007
SPECTRA ENERGY CORP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 20-5413139 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
5400 Westheimer Court
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
713-627-5400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of July 31, 2008: 614,835,860
SPECTRA ENERGY CORP
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
June 30, 2008
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by terms and phrases such as anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, expect, continue, should, could, may, plan, project, predict, will, potential, forecast, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to be materially different from the results predicted. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to:
| state, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an effect on rate structure, and affect the speed at and degree to which competition enters the natural gas industries; |
| outcomes of litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings or inquiries; |
| weather and other natural phenomena, including the economic, operational and other effects of hurricanes and storms; |
| the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; |
| general economic conditions, including any potential effects arising from terrorist attacks and any consequential or other hostilities; |
| changes in environmental, safety and other laws and regulations; |
| results of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings and general economic conditions; |
| increases in the cost of goods and services required to complete capital projects; |
| declines in the market prices of equity securities and resulting funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans; |
| growth in opportunities, including the timing and success of efforts to develop domestic and international pipeline, storage, gathering, processing and other infrastructure projects and the effects of competition; |
| the performance of natural gas transmission and storage, distribution, and gathering and processing facilities; |
| the extent of success in connecting natural gas supplies to gathering, processing and transmission systems and in connecting to expanding gas markets; |
| the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies; |
| conditions of the capital markets during the periods covered by the forward-looking statements; and |
| the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition or divestiture plans; regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of a merger, acquisition or divestiture; and the success of the business following a merger, acquisition or divestiture. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than Spectra Energy Corp has described. Spectra Energy Corp undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
3
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Operating Revenues |
||||||||||||
Transportation, storage and processing of natural gas |
$ | 596 | $ | 536 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 1,078 | ||||
Distribution of natural gas |
296 | 296 | 1,026 | 954 | ||||||||
Sales of natural gas liquids |
185 | 94 | 404 | 244 | ||||||||
Other |
64 | 59 | 125 | 110 | ||||||||
Total operating revenues |
1,141 | 985 | 2,749 | 2,386 | ||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||
Natural gas and petroleum products purchased |
275 | 237 | 896 | 799 | ||||||||
Operating, maintenance and other |
344 | 269 | 628 | 527 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
151 | 128 | 296 | 250 | ||||||||
Property and other taxes |
64 | 49 | 125 | 89 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
834 | 683 | 1,945 | 1,665 | ||||||||
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net |
32 | | 32 | 1 | ||||||||
Operating Income |
339 | 302 | 836 | 722 | ||||||||
Other Income and Expenses |
||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
243 | 129 | 452 | 219 | ||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
10 | 10 | 21 | 26 | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
253 | 139 | 473 | 245 | ||||||||
Interest Expense |
149 | 156 | 307 | 311 | ||||||||
Minority Interest Expense |
14 | 15 | 33 | 31 | ||||||||
Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
429 | 270 | 969 | 625 | ||||||||
Income Tax Expense From Continuing Operations |
134 | 85 | 307 | 204 | ||||||||
Income From Continuing Operations |
295 | 185 | 662 | 421 | ||||||||
Income From Discontinued Operations, net of tax |
| 11 | | 11 | ||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 295 | $ | 196 | $ | 662 | $ | 432 | ||||
Common Stock Data |
||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
||||||||||||
Basic |
630 | 632 | 631 | 631 | ||||||||
Diluted |
633 | 635 | 634 | 635 | ||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.66 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.66 | ||||
Earnings per share total |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.68 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.68 | ||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.44 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
ASSETS |
||||||
Current Assets |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 89 | $ | 94 | ||
Short-term investments |
46 | | ||||
Receivables, net |
874 | 907 | ||||
Inventory |
216 | 287 | ||||
Other |
294 | 91 | ||||
Total current assets |
1,519 | 1,379 | ||||
Investments and Other Assets |
||||||
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates |
1,924 | 1,780 | ||||
Goodwill |
3,880 | 3,948 | ||||
Other |
609 | 631 | ||||
Total investments and other assets |
6,413 | 6,359 | ||||
Property, Plant and Equipment |
||||||
Cost |
18,616 | 18,154 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
4,073 | 3,854 | ||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
14,543 | 14,300 | ||||
Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits |
925 | 932 | ||||
Total Assets |
$ | 23,400 | $ | 22,970 | ||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SPECTRA ENERGY CORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-share amounts)
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 468 | $ | 363 | ||
Notes payable and commercial paper |
667 | 715 | ||||
Taxes accrued |
105 | 85 | ||||
Interest accrued |
149 | 146 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
589 | 338 | ||||
Other |
889 | 775 | ||||
Total current liabilities |
2,867 | 2,422 | ||||
Long-term Debt |
8,490 | 8,345 | ||||
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities |
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,917 | 2,883 | ||||
Regulatory and other |
1,637 | 1,657 | ||||
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
4,554 | 4,540 | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||
Minority Interests |
620 | 806 | ||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par, 22 million shares authorized, no shares outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
| | ||||
Common stock, $0.001 par, 1 billion shares authorized, 623 million and 632 million shares outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
1 | 1 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
4,405 | 4,658 | ||||
Retained earnings |
738 | 368 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,725 | 1,830 | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
6,869 | 6,857 | ||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 23,400 | $ | 22,970 | ||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 662 | $ | 432 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
300 | 254 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense |
35 | 88 | ||||||
Minority interest expense |
33 | 31 | ||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
(452 | ) | (219 | ) | ||||
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates |
439 | 119 | ||||||
Other |
124 | (51 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,141 | 654 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(608 | ) | (424 | ) | ||||
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates |
(322 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of Spectra Energy Income Fund |
(274 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
(880 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities |
910 | | ||||||
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates |
149 | | ||||||
Other |
1 | 14 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,024 | ) | (504 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt |
1,400 | | ||||||
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt |
(903 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable and commercial paper |
(48 | ) | 366 | |||||
Distributions to minority interests |
(25 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
Contributions from minority interests |
16 | | ||||||
Repurchase of Spectra Energy common shares |
(284 | ) | | |||||
Dividends paid |
(292 | ) | (279 | ) | ||||
Other |
13 | 3 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(123 | ) | 29 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
1 | 51 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(5 | ) | 230 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
94 | 299 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 89 | $ | 529 | ||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Members Equity |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges |
Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 |
$ | 1 | $ | 4,658 | $ | 368 | $ | | $ | 2,033 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (195 | ) | $ | 6,857 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 662 | | | | | 662 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| | | | (145 | ) | | | (145 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized mark-to-market net gain on hedges |
| | | | | 14 | | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and benefits impact of |
| | | | | | 26 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchase |
| (284 | ) | | | | | | (284 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on common stock |
| | (292 | ) | | | | | (292 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 20 | | | | | | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 11 | | | | | | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 |
$ | 1 | $ | 4,405 | $ | 738 | $ | | $ | 1,888 | $ | 6 | $ | (169 | ) | $ | 6,869 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,598 | $ | 1,156 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (109 | ) | $ | 5,639 | |||||||||||||
Conversion to Spectra Energy Corp |
1 | 4,597 | | (4,598 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 432 | | | | | 432 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| | | | 478 | | | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of cash flow hedges into earnings |
| | | | | 1 | | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and benefits impact of |
| | (8 | ) | | | | 29 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FIN 48 implementation |
| | (26 | ) | | | | | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer of net assets and liabilities from Duke Energy |
| (3 | ) | | | | | (100 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on common stock |
| | (279 | ) | | | | | (279 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 7 | | | | | | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007 |
$ | 1 | $ | 4,601 | $ | 119 | $ | | $ | 1,634 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (180 | ) | $ | 6,170 | |||||||||||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. General
Nature of Operations. Spectra Energy Corp, through its subsidiaries and equity affiliates (collectively, Spectra Energy), owns and operates a large and diversified portfolio of complementary natural gas-related energy assets. Spectra Energy operates in three key areas of the natural gas industry: transmission and storage, distribution, and gathering and processing. Spectra Energy provides transportation and storage of natural gas to customers in various regions of the northeastern and southeastern United States, the Maritime Provinces in Canada and the Pacific Northwest in the United States and Canada, and in the province of Ontario, Canada. Spectra Energy also provides natural gas sales and distribution services to retail customers in Ontario, and natural gas gathering and processing services to customers in Western Canada. In addition, Spectra Energy owns a 50% interest in DCP Midstream, LLC (DCP Midstream), one of the largest natural gas gatherers and processors in the United States.
Basis of Presentation. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Spectra Energy Corp, its majority-owned subsidiaries where Spectra Energy has control and those variable interest entities, if any, where Spectra Energy is the primary beneficiary. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in Spectra Energys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present Spectra Energys results of operations and financial position. Amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods due to the effects of seasonal temperature variations on energy consumption, primarily in the gas distribution operations of Spectra Energy, as well as changing commodity prices on certain of the processing operations and other factors.
Use of Estimates. To conform with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Although these estimates are based on managements best available knowledge at the time, actual results could differ.
Reclassifications. The components of Operating Revenues on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the 2007 periods have been reclassified to conform to the current reporting presentation.
Spin-off from Duke Energy Corporation. In conjunction with the spin-off of Spectra Energy from Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on January 2, 2007, Duke Energy transferred to Spectra Energy the assets and liabilities, including related tax effects, associated with Spectra Energys employee benefits and captive insurance positions, as well as miscellaneous corporate assets and liabilities. The net effect of these non-cash transfers during the first six months of 2007 is reflected as a decrease of $3 million to Additional Paid-in Capital and a decrease of $100 million to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity.
2. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acquisition Spectra Energy Income Fund. On May 1, 2008, Westcoast Energy Inc. (Westcoast), a subsidiary of Spectra Energy, acquired the 24.4 million units of the Spectra Energy Income Fund (Income Fund) that were held by non-affiliated holders at a purchase price of 11.25 Canadian dollars per unit, for a total purchase price of 279 million Canadian dollars (approximately $274 million). Westcoast now owns 100% of the Midstream operations. Prior to the acquisition, the Income Fund indirectly held 54% of Spectra Energys consolidated Midstream operations and Westcoast indirectly held the remaining 46%. The Income Fund is included in the Western Canada Transmission & Processing business segment. The transaction, primarily driven by changes in Canadian federal tax rules as related to income trusts, was accounted for as a step acquisition, using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations.
9
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of May 1, 2008:
Purchase Price Allocation |
||||
(in millions) | ||||
Purchase price |
$ | 274 | ||
Current assets |
20 | |||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
363 | |||
Current liabilities |
(11 | ) | ||
Long-term debt (intercompany) |
(89 | ) | ||
Deferred credits and other liabilities |
(9 | ) | ||
Deferred income taxes |
(49 | ) | ||
Total assets acquired / liabilities assumed |
225 | |||
Goodwill |
$ | 49 | ||
Disposition Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C. and P-25 pipeline. In April 2008, Spectra Energy completed the sale of Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C. and the P-25 pipeline to Spectra Energy Partners, LP (Spectra Energy Partners) for $107 million. Proceeds from the sale consisted of 4,207,641 Spectra Energy Partners common units, 85,870 general partner units and $5 million in cash. Spectra Energys ownership of Spectra Energy Partners increased from 83% to 84% as a result of the issuance of the new common and general partner units. No gain or loss was recognized on the disposition since this transaction represented a transfer of entities under common control.
3. Business Segments
Spectra Energy manages its business in four reportable segments: U.S. Transmission, Distribution, Western Canada Transmission & Processing and Field Services. The remainder of Spectra Energys business operations is presented as Other, and consists of unallocated corporate costs, wholly owned captive insurance subsidiaries, employee benefit plan assets and liabilities, and other miscellaneous activities.
Spectra Energys chief operating decision maker regularly reviews financial information about each of these business units in deciding how to allocate resources and evaluate performance. All of the business units are considered reportable segments under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. There is no aggregation within Spectra Energys defined business segments.
U.S. Transmission provides transportation and storage of natural gas for customers in various regions of the Eastern and Southeastern United States and the Maritime Provinces in Canada. The natural gas transmission and storage operations in the U.S. are primarily subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions (FERCs) rules and regulations.
Distribution provides retail natural gas distribution service in Ontario, as well as natural gas transportation and storage services to other utilities and energy market participants in Ontario, Quebec and the United States. These services are provided by Union Gas Limited (Union Gas), and are primarily subject to the rules and regulations of the Ontario Energy Board (OEB).
Western Canada Transmission & Processing provides transportation of natural gas, natural gas gathering and processing services, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) extraction, fractionation, transportation, storage and marketing to customers in Western Canada and the northern tier of the United States. This segment conducts business primarily through the BC Pipeline and Field Services operations, the Empress System and the Midstream business, which includes the Income Fund discussed in Note 2. BC Pipeline and Field Services operations are primarily subject to the rules and regulations of Canadas National Energy Board (NEB).
10
Field Services gathers and processes natural gas and fractionates, markets and trades NGLs. It conducts operations through DCP Midstream, which is owned 50% by Spectra Energy and 50% by ConocoPhillips. Field Services gathers raw natural gas through gathering systems located in eight major natural gas producing regions: Permian Basin, Mid-Continent, Rocky Mountain, East Texas-North Louisiana, Barnett Shale, Gulf Coast, South Texas and Central Texas.
Spectra Energys reportable segments offer different products and services and are managed separately as business units. Management evaluates segment performance based on earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) from continuing operations, after deducting minority interest expense related to those profits.
On a segment basis, EBIT excludes discontinued operations, represents all profits from continuing operations (both operating and non-operating) before deducting interest and taxes, and is net of the minority interest expense related to those profits. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are managed centrally by Spectra Energy, so the associated realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, and interest and dividend income on those balances are excluded from the segments EBIT.
Transactions between reportable segments are accounted for on the same basis as with unaffiliated third parties.
11
Business Segment Data (a)
Unaffiliated Revenues |
Intersegment Revenues |
Total Revenues |
Segment EBIT / Consolidated Earnings from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes |
||||||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
U.S. Transmission |
$ | 399 | $ | 1 | $ | 400 | $ | 244 | |||||||
Distribution |
353 | | 353 | 54 | |||||||||||
Western Canada Transmission & Processing |
388 | | 388 | 87 | |||||||||||
Field Services |
| | | 216 | |||||||||||
Total reportable segments |
1,140 | 1 | 1,141 | 601 | |||||||||||
Other |
1 | 11 | 12 | (28 | ) | ||||||||||
Eliminations |
| (12 | ) | (12 | ) | | |||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (149 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest income and other (b) |
| | | 5 | |||||||||||
Total consolidated |
$ | 1,141 | $ | | $ | 1,141 | $ | 429 | |||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||
U.S. Transmission |
$ | 369 | $ | 1 | $ | 370 | $ | 223 | |||||||
Distribution |
351 | | 351 | 54 | |||||||||||
Western Canada Transmission & Processing |
262 | | 262 | 48 | |||||||||||
Field Services |
| | | 123 | |||||||||||
Total reportable segments |
982 | 1 | 983 | 448 | |||||||||||
Other |
3 | 5 | 8 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Eliminations |
| (6 | ) | (6 | ) | | |||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (156 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest income and other (b) |
| | | 4 | |||||||||||
Total consolidated |
$ | 985 | $ | | $ | 985 | $ | 270 | |||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
U.S. Transmission |
$ | 801 | $ | 2 | $ | 803 | $ | 470 | |||||||
Distribution |
1,153 | | 1,153 | 219 | |||||||||||
Western Canada Transmission & Processing |
793 | | 793 | 218 | |||||||||||
Field Services |
| | | 408 | |||||||||||
Total reportable segments |
2,747 | 2 | 2,749 | 1,315 | |||||||||||
Other |
2 | 19 | 21 | (48 | ) | ||||||||||
Eliminations |
| (21 | ) | (21 | ) | | |||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (307 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest income and other (b) |
| | | 9 | |||||||||||
Total consolidated |
$ | 2,749 | $ | | $ | 2,749 | $ | 969 | |||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||
U.S. Transmission |
$ | 745 | $ | 2 | $ | 747 | $ | 443 | |||||||
Distribution |
1,064 | | 1,064 | 198 | |||||||||||
Western Canada Transmission & Processing |
573 | | 573 | 122 | |||||||||||
Field Services |
| | | 205 | |||||||||||
Total reportable segments |
2,382 | 2 | 2,384 | 968 | |||||||||||
Other |
4 | 11 | 15 | (41 | ) | ||||||||||
Eliminations |
| (13 | ) | (13 | ) | | |||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (311 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest income and other (b) |
| | | 9 | |||||||||||
Total consolidated |
$ | 2,386 | $ | | $ | 2,386 | $ | 625 | |||||||
(a) | Segment results exclude discontinued operations. |
(b) | Other includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses, additional minority interest expense not allocated to the segment results and intersegment eliminations. |
12
4. Regulatory Matters
Union Gas. Union Gas has rates that are approved by the OEB. Final 2008 rates, reflecting the incentive regulation settlement agreement accepted by the OEB on January 17, 2008, were implemented April 1, 2008, retroactive to January 1, 2008.
In November 2006, Union Gas received a decision from the OEB on the regulation of rates for gas storage services in Ontario (the Storage Forbearance Decision). The OEB determined that it would not regulate the rates for storage services to customers outside Union Gas franchise area or the rates for new storage services to customers within its franchise area. The Storage Forbearance Decision requires Union Gas to continue to share long-term storage margin with ratepayers over a four-year phase-out period that started in 2007.
In March 2008, Union Gas applied to the OEB for the annual disposition of its 2007 non-commodity deferral account balances. The OEB issued its decision in this application in June 2008 finding that Union Gas should share revenue on all long-term storage contracts. Union Gas had previously interpreted the Storage Forbearance Decision to apply only to those contracts that were in existence as of the date of the Storage Forbearance Decision. Union Gas has appealed this decision and expects the OEB to hear its motion in the third quarter of 2008 and issue its decision by year-end. Union Gas recorded a $15 million charge to Transportation, Storage and Processing of Natural Gas operating revenues on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the second quarter of 2008 as a result of this decision.
BC Pipeline. The existing two-year BC Pipeline settlement agreement reached with customers and approved by the NEB expired on December 31, 2007. On December 18, 2007, the NEB approved 2008 interim transportation tolls. On May 22, 2008, the NEB approved BC Pipelines application requesting the approval of 2008 revised interim tolls effective June 1, 2008. BC Pipeline and its customers have recently reached an agreement in principle regarding the determination of tolls for transmission services for 2008, 2009 and 2010, subject to completion of the final form of settlement agreement and approval by the NEB. Approval by the NEB of the settlement agreement is required for the existing interim tolls to be deemed final tolls.
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline Limited Partnership (M&N LP). In 2007, M&N LP operated under an NEB-approved toll settlement that expired December 31, 2007. A toll settlement agreement for the 2008 fiscal year was approved by the NEB on January 16, 2008.
5. Gains on the Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
In the second quarter of 2008, Spectra Energys U.S. Transmission segment received shares of stock as consideration for a customer bankruptcy settlement and recorded a gain of $31 million ($21 million after tax) which is reflected in Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, Net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Subsequent to receipt, the securities were accounted for under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, as available-for-sale securities and are included in Short-Term Investments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2008.
6. Income Taxes
Income tax expense from continuing operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 was $134 million and $307 million, respectively, compared to $85 million and $204 million reported in the same periods in 2007, increasing primarily as a result of higher earnings in 2008.
The effective tax rate for income from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 31.2% as compared to 31.5% for the same period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 31.7% as compared to 32.6% for the same period of 2007. The lower effective tax rates in the current periods primarily relate to enacted Canada provincial tax rate reductions.
Spectra Energy recognized no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008. Although uncertain, Spectra Energy believes it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by approximately $11 million prior to June 30, 2009. The anticipated changes in unrecognized tax benefits relate to expected audit settlements focused primarily on classification of certain tax attributes, transfer pricing and expiration of statutes of limitations.
13
7. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and all other non-owner changes in equity. Components of comprehensive income are as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 295 | $ | 196 | $ | 662 | $ | 432 | |||||
Other comprehensive income |
|||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
21 | 450 | (145 | ) | 478 | ||||||||
Reclassification of cash flow hedges into earnings (a) |
17 | 1 | 14 | 1 | |||||||||
Pension and benefits impact of SFAS 158 (b) |
6 | | 26 | | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
44 | 451 | (105 | ) | 479 | ||||||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 339 | $ | 647 | $ | 557 | $ | 911 | |||||
(a) | Net of $4 million and $3 million of tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. |
(b) | Includes $1 million of net tax expense and $15 million of net tax benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. |
8. Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing earnings available for common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing earnings available for common stockholders by the diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to issue common stock, such as stock options, stock-based performance unit awards and phantom stock awards, were exercised, settled or converted into common stock.
The following table presents Spectra Energys basic and diluted EPS calculations:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(in millions, except per-share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 295 | $ | 185 | $ | 662 | $ | 421 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 11 | | 11 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 295 | $ | 196 | $ | 662 | $ | 432 | ||||
Weighted average common shares |
||||||||||||
Basic |
630 | 632 | 631 | 631 | ||||||||
Diluted |
633 | 635 | 634 | 635 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.66 | ||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 0.02 | | 0.02 | ||||||||
Total basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.68 | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.66 | ||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 0.02 | | 0.02 | ||||||||
Total diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.68 | ||||
Weighted-average shares used to calculate diluted EPS includes the effect of certain options and restricted stock awards. Certain other options and stock awards related to approximately six million shares for the periods presented were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because either the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares during these periods or performance measures related to the awards had not yet been met.
14
9. Inventory
Inventory consists of natural gas and NGLs held in storage for transmission and processing, and also includes materials and supplies. Natural gas inventories related to the Distribution segment in Canada are valued at costs approved by the OEB. The difference between the approved price and the actual cost of gas purchased is recorded in either accounts receivable or other current liabilities for future disposition with customers, subject to approval by the OEB. The remaining inventory is recorded at cost, primarily using average cost.
The components of inventory are as follows:
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
(in millions) | ||||||
Natural gas |
$ | 65 | $ | 154 | ||
Natural gas liquids |
55 | 25 | ||||
Materials and supplies |
96 | 108 | ||||
Total inventory |
$ | 216 | $ | 287 | ||
10. Investments in and Loans to Unconsolidated Affiliates
Spectra Energys most significant investment in unconsolidated affiliates is the 50% investment in DCP Midstream, which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The following represents summary financial information for DCP Midstream, presented at 100%.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 4,831 | $ | 3,209 | $ | 8,877 | $ | 6,099 | ||||
Operating expenses |
4,475 | 2,931 | 8,109 | 5,617 | ||||||||
Operating income |
356 | 278 | 768 | 482 | ||||||||
Net income |
433 | 245 | 816 | 409 |
As further discussed in Note 14, Spectra Energy entered into a propane sales agreement with an affiliate of DCP Midstream in the second quarter of 2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Spectra Energy recorded revenues of $14 million associated with this agreement, classified within Income From Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax.
In the first half of 2008, Spectra Energy loaned Southeast Supply Header, LLC (SESH), a 50%-owned equity affiliate, $92 million in connection with the construction of SESH pipeline facilities. Loans receivable from SESH totaled $238 million at June 30, 2008 and $146 million at December 31, 2007.
In the first half of 2008, Spectra Energy loaned Steckman Ridge, LP (Steckman), a 50%-owned equity affiliate, $14 million in connection with the construction of Steckman storage facilities. Loans receivable from Steckman totaled $17 million at June 30, 2008 and $3 million at December 31, 2007.
11. | Debt and Credit Facilities |
Credit Facilities Summary
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expiration Date |
Credit Facilities Capacity |
Commercial Paper |
Term Loan |
Revolving Credit |
Letters of Credit |
Total | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Spectra Energy Capital, LLC |
2012 | $ | 1,500 | (a) | $ | 584 | $ | | $ | | $ | 5 | $ | 589 | |||||||
Westcoast Energy, Inc. |
2011 | 196 | (b) | 83 | | | | 83 | |||||||||||||
Union Gas Limited |
2012 | 489 | (c) | | | | | | |||||||||||||
Spectra Energy Partners, LP |
2012 | 500 | (d) | | 94 | 146 | | 240 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,685 | $ | 667 | $ | 94 | $ | 146 | $ | 5 | $ | 912 | |||||||||
(a) | Contains a covenant requiring the debt-to-total capitalization ratio to not exceed 65%. |
15
(b) | Denominated in Canadian dollars totaling 200 million and contains a covenant that requires the debt-to-total capitalization ratio to not exceed 75%. |
(c) | Denominated in Canadian dollars totaling 500 million and contains a covenant that requires the debt-to-total capitalization ratio to not exceed 75% and a provision which requires Union Gas to repay all borrowings under the facility for a period of two days during the second quarter of each year. |
(d) | Contains a covenant requiring the borrower to collateralize the term loan with qualifying investment-grade securities in an amount equal to or greater than the outstanding principal amount of the loan. The terms of the credit facility allow for liquidation of collateral to fund capital expenditures or certain acquisitions provided that an equal amount of term loan is converted to a revolving loan. Investments in marketable securities totaling $95 million at June 30, 2008 and $155 million at December 31, 2007 were pledged as collateral against the term loan. These investments are classified as Investments and Other Assets Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Spectra Energys debt and credit agreements contain various financial and other covenants. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements. As of June 30, 2008, Spectra Energy was in compliance with those covenants. In addition, credit agreements allow for acceleration of payments or termination of the agreements due to nonpayment, or in certain cases, due to the acceleration of other significant indebtedness of the borrower or certain of its subsidiaries. None of the debt or credit agreements contain material adverse change clauses.
In April 2008, Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (Spectra Capital) issued $500 million of 6.20% notes due 2018. Net proceeds from the offering were used to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of commercial paper as it matures. Also in April 2008, Union Gas issued 200 million Canadian dollars (approximately $198 million) of 5.35% notes due 2018. Net proceeds from the offering were used to refinance prior debt maturities and for general corporate purposes.
12. Common Stock Repurchases
On May 6, 2008, Spectra Energys Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $600 million. Purchases of Spectra Energy common stock under the program may be made from time to time in the open market. The shares are retired upon repurchase and presented as a reduction to Additional Paid-In Capital on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Stock repurchases under the approved plan totaled $284 million as of June 30, 2008. The program does not have an expiration date; however, significant purchases were completed in July 2008 and Spectra Energy expects to complete the repurchase of the $600 million of shares during August 2008.
13. Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, Spectra Energy adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires entities to, among other things, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect Spectra Energys market assumptions. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, these two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
| Level 1 Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
| Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. |
| Level 3 Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. |
16
The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, Spectra Energys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008.
Description |
Balance Sheet Caption |
Total at June 30, 2008 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 23 | $ | | $ | 23 | $ | | |||||
Short term investment |
Short-term investments | 15 | 15 | | | |||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
Short-term investments | 31 | 31 | | | |||||||||
Short-term derivative assets |
Other current assets | 108 | | | 108 | |||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
Investments and other assets-other | 134 | 39 | 95 | | |||||||||
Employee benefit assets |
Investments and other assets-other | 24 | 24 | | | |||||||||
Long-term derivative assets |
Investments and other assets-other | 93 | | 14 | 79 | |||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 428 | $ | 109 | $ | 132 | $ | 187 | ||||||
Long-term derivative liabilities |
Deferred credits and other liabilities-regulatory and other | 14 | | 14 | | |||||||||
Total Liabilities |
$ | 14 | $ | | $ | 14 | $ | | ||||||
The table below reconciles assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Short-Term Derivative Asset |
Short-Term Derivative Liability |
Long-Term Derivative Asset |
Long-Term Derivative Liability |
|||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||
Fair value, March 31, 2008 |
$ | 51 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 62 | $ | | |||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
| | | | ||||||||||
Included in regulatory assets |
55 | | | | ||||||||||
Included in Other Comprehensive Income |
| 2 | 17 | | ||||||||||
Normal purchases and sales election under SFAS No. 133 |
| | | | ||||||||||
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
2 | 5 | | | ||||||||||
Fair value, June 30, 2008 |
$ | 108 | $ | | $ | 79 | $ | | ||||||
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets held at June 30, 2008 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||
Fair value, December 31, 2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 47 | $ | (21 | ) | |||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
| | 11 | (11 | ) | |||||||||
Included in regulatory assets |
105 | | | | ||||||||||
Included in Other Comprehensive Income |
| (5 | ) | 21 | | |||||||||
Normal purchases and sales election under SFAS No. 133 |
| | | 32 | ||||||||||
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
3 | 5 | | | ||||||||||
Fair value, June 30, 2008 |
$ | 108 | $ | | $ | 79 | $ | | ||||||
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11 | $ | (11 | ) | |||||
17
Level 2 Valuation Techniques
Fair values of Spectra Energys available-for-sale securities, primarily fixed-income debt instruments that are actively traded in the secondary market, are determined based on market-based prices. These valuations may include inputs such as quoted market prices of the exact or similar instruments, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources that may include models or matrix pricing tools, with reasonable levels of price transparency.
Level 3 Valuation Techniques
Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques where at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
The fair values of Level 3 derivative instruments are estimated using proprietary valuation models that utilize both market observable and unobservable parameters. The long-term derivative asset and liability is valued using internal valuation models and techniques that include such inputs as forward natural gas and power prices, forward interest rates and foreign currency assumptions. The short-term derivative asset is valued based upon interest rates, natural gas options pricing for current and future months including volatility, foreign exchange fluctuations and swap values.
Gains and losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 associated with the long-term derivative asset and liability are reported in Other Income and Expenses, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and are of offsetting amounts, and as such, have no net impact on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During 2008, there were no adjustments to assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental
Spectra Energy is subject to international, federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. These regulations can be changed from time to time, imposing new obligations on Spectra Energy.
Remediation activities. Like others in the energy industry, Spectra Energy and its affiliates are responsible for environmental remediation at various contaminated sites. These include some properties that are part of ongoing Spectra Energy operations, sites formerly owned or used by Spectra Energy entities, and sites owned by third parties. Remediation typically involves management of contaminated soils and may involve groundwater remediation. Managed in conjunction with relevant international, federal, state/provincial and local agencies, activities vary with site conditions and locations, remedial requirements, complexity and sharing of responsibility. If remediation activities involve statutory joint and several liability provisions, strict liability, or cost recovery or contribution actions, Spectra Energy or its affiliates could potentially be held responsible for contamination caused by other parties. In some instances, Spectra Energy may share liability associated with contamination with other potentially responsible parties, and may also benefit from insurance policies or contractual indemnities that cover some or all cleanup costs. All of these sites generally are managed in the normal course of business or affiliate operations. Management believes that completion or resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on Spectra Energys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Extended Environmental Activities, Accruals. Included in Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities Regulatory and Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were accruals related to extended environmental-related activities totaling $20 million as of June 30, 2008 and $22 million as of December 31, 2007. These accruals represent provisions for costs associated with remediation activities at some current and former sites, as well as other environmental contingent liabilities. Management believes that completion or resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on Spectra Energys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Litigation
Sonatrach/Sonatrading Arbitration. In an arbitration proceeding that commenced in January 2001 in London, England, Duke Energy LNG Sales Inc., now Spectra Energy LNG Sales, Inc. (Spectra Energy LNG), claimed that Sonatrach, the Algerian state-owned energy company, together with its subsidiary, Sonatrading, breached their shipping obligations under a liquefied natural gas (LNG) purchase agreement and related transportation agreements (the LNG Agreements) relating to Spectra Energy LNGs purchase of LNG from Algeria and its transportation by LNG tanker to Lake Charles, Louisiana. Sonatrading and Sonatrach claimed that
18
Spectra Energy LNG had repudiated the LNG Agreements by allegedly failing to diligently perform LNG marketing obligations. In 2003, the arbitration tribunal issued a Partial Award on liability issues and found that Sonatrach and Sonatrading breached their obligations to provide shipping. The tribunal also found that Spectra Energy LNG breached the LNG Purchase Agreement by failing to perform marketing obligations. The tribunal issued its award on damages on November 30, 2006. In the second quarter of 2007, the parties reached a settlement agreement on claims which accrued on or prior to May 24, 2002 and Spectra Energy LNG received $18 million, which was recorded as $11 million in Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In June 2008, the parties entered into a settlement agreement under which Spectra Energy LNGs claims for the period after May 2002 were satisfied pursuant to commercial transactions involving the purchase of propane from Sonatrach. Spectra Energy entered into associated agreements with an affiliate of DCP Midstream and another party for the sale of these propane volumes. Net purchases and sales of propane under these arrangements are recorded as Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax. During June 2008, the net income associated with this activity was minimal.
Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan. A class action lawsuit was filed in federal court in South Carolina in 2006 against Duke Energy and the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan. A second similar class action was also filed in 2006 alleging similar claims and seeking to represent the same class of defendants, but this second case was dismissed without prejudice, and only the first case has moved forward. Various causes of action were alleged in the class action lawsuit, including violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. These allegations arise out of the conversion of the Duke Power Company Employees Retirement Plan into the Duke Power Company Retirement Cash Balance Plan. The plaintiffs seek to represent present and former participants in the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan. This group is estimated to include approximately 36,000 persons. Duke Energy filed its answer in March 2006, and various motions were thereafter filed by the parties, including plaintiffs motion to certify a class, Duke Energys motion to dismiss, and cross motions for summary judgment filed by both the plaintiffs and Duke Energy. A hearing on the motions was held in December 2007, and the Court issued a series of rulings in June 2008 denying the plaintiffs class certification motion, dismissing certain of the causes of action originally filed by plaintiffs and allowing other causes of action to proceed. As a result of these rulings, the Plaintiffs re-filed a new Amended Class Action Complaint in June 2008 asserting and re-pleading the claims which the Court is allowing to proceed. A new scheduling order has been entered and it is expected that certain discovery activities will ensue with respect to the surviving causes of action. Duke Energy filed a motion to dismiss in July 2008 requesting the dismissal of plaintiffs breach of fiduciary claims.
In connection with the spin-off from Duke Energy in January 2007, Spectra Energy has agreed to share with Duke Energy any liabilities or damages associated with this matter that relate to Spectra Energy employees that may be members of a plaintiff class if one is certified. It is not possible to predict with certainty whether Spectra Energy will incur any liability or to estimate the damages, if any, that might be incurred in connection with this matter.
Other Litigation and Legal Proceedings. Spectra Energy and its subsidiaries are involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings in various forums arising in the ordinary course of business, including matters regarding contract, royalty, measurement and payment claims, some of which involve substantial monetary amounts. Spectra Energy has insurance coverage for certain of these losses should they be incurred. Management believes that the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on Spectra Energys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Spectra Energy has exposure to certain legal matters that are described herein. Spectra Energy had no material reserves as of June 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007 related to litigation matters in accordance with managements best estimate of probable loss as defined by SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Legal costs related to the defense of loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Spectra Energy Islander East Pipeline Company, LLC (Spectra Islander), a wholly owned subsidiary, is a 50% equity partner and operator for the Islander East pipeline project which is owned by Islander East Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Islander East), a proposed pipeline that would connect natural gas supplies to markets on Long Island, New York. This project has received FERC and other approvals but has been denied a Section 401 Water Quality Certificate (WQC) by the State of Connecticut and was the subject of an appeal before the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (the 2nd Circuit) filed in December 2006. On May 2, 2008, the 2nd Circuit denied Islander Easts appeal concerning the States second WQC denial. Islander East subsequently filed a petition with the 2nd Circuit seeking reconsideration of the courts denial in the WQC case. In August 2007, a Connecticut U.S. District Court determined that the Secretary of Commerces 2004 decision to override the States denial to issue a Coastal Zone Management Act (CZM) approval was not supported by the record and remanded the matter back to the Secretary of Commerce. Islander East and the U.S. Office of Solicitor General (the Solicitor General) subsequently filed appeals with the 2nd Circuit to overturn the lower courts decision to remand and the State filed a motion to dismiss claiming the U.S. District Courts remand order was non-appealable. In January 2008, the 2nd Circuit
19
granted the States motion to dismiss. In March 2008, Islander East and the Solicitor General filed separate petitions with the 2nd Circuit seeking reconsideration of the 2nd Circuits decision in the CZM case. On June 23, 2008, the 2nd Circuit denied the petitions for both the CZM and WQC matters. Islander East and the Solicitor General are consulting on the next steps concerning the CZM matter and Islander East intends to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court to seek review of the WQC matter. Management continues to believe that there are sufficient factual and legal bases supporting Islander Easts position that the States denial of the WQC was in error. Due to the appellate process, management has deferred the project completion date from its previous plans to accommodate the U.S. Supreme Courts review of the petition for a writ of certiorari. However, Islander East remains committed to serving this market area through the development of a future firm transportation project. As of June 30, 2008, Islander East had incurred and capitalized cumulative development costs of $60 million (100% Islander East project level). Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC (Algonquin), a wholly owned subsidiary, also has a companion project, the AGT Islander East Lease Project. As of June 30, 2008 Algonquin had incurred and capitalized cumulative development costs of $20 million associated with the AGT Islander East Lease Project. Management expects the development and material costs incurred to date could be utilized by other capital projects of Spectra Energy or a deferred project of Islander East, or with respect to materials, sales to third parties.
See Note 15 for a discussion of guarantees and indemnifications.
15. Guarantees and Indemnifications
Spectra Energy and certain of its subsidiaries have various financial guarantees and indemnifications which are issued in the normal course of business. As discussed below, these contracts include financial guarantees, stand-by letters of credit, debt guarantees, surety bonds and indemnifications. Spectra Energy and its subsidiaries enter into these arrangements to facilitate a commercial transaction with a third party by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party. To varying degrees, these guarantees involve elements of performance and credit risk, which are not included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The possibility of Spectra Energy having to honor its contingencies is largely dependent upon future operations of various subsidiaries, investees and other third parties, or the occurrence of certain future events.
Spectra Energy has issued performance guarantees to customers and other third parties that guarantee the payment and performance of other parties, including certain non-wholly owned entities. In connection with the spin-off of Spectra Energy to Duke Energy shareholders, certain guarantees that were previously issued by Spectra Energy have been assigned to, or replaced by, Duke Energy in 2006. For any remaining guarantees of other Duke Energy obligations, Duke Energy has indemnified Spectra Energy against any losses incurred under these guarantee arrangements.
The maximum potential amount of future payments Spectra Energy could have been required to make under these performance guarantees as of June 30, 2008 was approximately $468 million, which has been indemnified by Duke Energy, as discussed above. Approximately $33 million of the performance guarantees will expire during the remainder of 2008 through 2010, with the remaining performance guarantees expiring after 2010 or having no contractual expiration.
Additionally, Spectra Energy has issued joint and several guarantees to some of the Duke/Fluor Daniel (D/FD) project owners, guaranteeing the performance of D/FD under its engineering, procurement and construction contracts and other contractual commitments. D/FD is one of the entities transferred to Duke Energy in connection with the spin-off of Spectra Energy from Duke Energy. Substantially all of these guarantees have no contractual expiration and no stated maximum amount of future payments that Spectra Energy could be required to make. Fluor Enterprises Inc., as 50% owner in D/FD, has issued similar joint and several guarantees to the same D/FD project owners. In accordance with the D/FD partnership agreement, each of the partners is responsible for 50% of any payments to be made under those guarantees.
Westcoast has issued performance guarantees to third parties guaranteeing the performance of unconsolidated entities, such as equity method investments, and of entities previously sold by Westcoast to third parties. Those guarantees require Westcoast to make payment to the guaranteed third party upon the failure of such unconsolidated or sold entity to make payment under some of its contractual obligations, such as debt, purchase contracts and leases. Certain guarantees that were previously issued by Westcoast for obligations of entities that remained a part of Duke Energy are considered guarantees of third-party performance; however, Duke Energy has indemnified Spectra Energy against any losses incurred under these guarantee arrangements.
The maximum potential amount of future payments Westcoast could have been required to make under those performance guarantees of non-wholly owned entities and third-party entities as of June 30, 2008 was $119 million, of which $30 million has been indemnified by Duke Energy, as discussed above. Of the total Westcoast amount, $19 million relates to guarantees associated with the debt at M&N LP, a non-wholly owned consolidated entity. Guarantees related to Westcoast have no contractual expiration.
20
Spectra Energy has entered into various indemnification agreements related to purchase and sale agreements and other types of contractual agreements with vendors and other third parties. These agreements typically cover environmental, tax, litigation and other matters, as well as breaches of representations, warranties and covenants. Typically, claims may be made by third parties for various periods of time, depending on the nature of the claim. Spectra Energys potential exposure under these indemnification agreements can range from a specified amount, such as the purchase price, to an unlimited dollar amount, depending on the nature of the claim and the particular transaction. Spectra Energy is unable to estimate the total potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements due to several factors, such as the unlimited exposure under certain guarantees.
At June 30, 2008, the amounts recorded for the guarantees and indemnifications described above, including the indemnifications by Duke Energy to Spectra Energy, are not material, both individually and in the aggregate.
16. Employee Benefit Plans
Retirement Plans. Effective with the separation from Duke Energy on January 2, 2007, Spectra Energy established a new qualified non-contributory defined benefit (DB) retirement plan for U.S. employees and new non-qualified plans for various executive retirement and savings plans. Spectra Energys Westcoast subsidiary maintains retirement plans that cover substantially all employees of Spectra Energys Canadian operations. In accordance with the separation agreement with Duke Energy, net qualified pension plan assets of $49 million and $52 million in liabilities associated with various executive retirement and savings plans were transferred to Spectra Energy in 2007.
Spectra Energys policy is to fund amounts for U.S. qualified retirement plans on an actuarial basis to provide assets sufficient to meet benefits to be paid to plan participants. Spectra Energy did not make contributions to its U.S. retirement plans in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and does not anticipate making any contributions to the U.S. plans during the remainder of 2008.
Spectra Energys policy is to fund its DB retirement plans in Canada on an actuarial basis and in accordance with Canadian pension standards legislation in order to accumulate assets sufficient to meet benefit payments. Contributions to the defined contribution (DC) retirement plan are determined in accordance with the terms of the plan. Spectra Energy made contributions to the Canadian qualified DB plans of $18 million and $21 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Spectra Energy anticipates that it will make total contributions of approximately $37 million to the Canadian DB plans in 2008. Spectra Energy also made contributions to the Canadian DC plan of $2 million during each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Spectra Energy anticipates that it will make total contributions of approximately $5 million to the Canadian DC plans in 2008.
Qualified Pension Plans Components of Net Periodic Pension Costs
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost benefit earned |
$ | 3 | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
7 | 7 | 14 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(9 | ) | (9 | ) | (18 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of loss |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 1 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost benefit earned |
$ | 4 | $ | 3 | $ | 8 | $ | 7 | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
10 | 9 | 20 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(12 | ) | (10 | ) | (24 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of loss |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 3 | $ | 4 | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | ||||||||
21
Non-Qualified Pension Benefits Plans Components of Net Periodic Pension Costs
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
U.S. |
||||||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
Canada |
||||||||||||
Service cost benefit earned |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | | ||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
Amortization of loss |
| | | 1 | ||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | ||||
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans. Spectra Energy and most of its subsidiaries provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees on a contributory and non-contributory basis. In accordance with the separation agreement, $194 million in liabilities associated with other post-retirement benefits were transferred to Spectra Energy upon the separation from Duke Energy.
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans Components of Net Periodic Costs
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. |
||||||||||||||||
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation |
$ | 3 | $ | 4 | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | ||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net transition liability |
2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit |
| | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of loss |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic other post-retirement benefit cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost benefit earned |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation |
2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic other post-retirement benefit cost |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
22
17. Consolidating Financial Information
Spectra Energy Corp has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment of principal and interest under all series of notes outstanding under the Senior Indenture of Spectra Capital, the wholly owned, consolidated subsidiary of Spectra Energy Corp. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules, the following condensed consolidating financial information is presented. The information shown for Spectra Energy Corp and Spectra Capital is presented utilizing the equity method of accounting for investments in subsidiaries, as required. The non-guarantor subsidiaries column represents all wholly owned subsidiaries of Spectra Capital. This information should be read in conjunction with Spectra Energys accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Spectra Energy Corp
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
(In millions)
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,141 | $ | | $ | 1,141 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
5 | 1 | 828 | | 834 | |||||||||||||
Gains on sales of other assets and other, net |
| | 32 | | 32 | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(5 | ) | (1 | ) | 345 | | 339 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
| | 243 | | 243 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
299 | 475 | | (774 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
(1 | ) | 4 | 7 | | 10 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 51 | 98 | | 149 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
| | 14 | | 14 | |||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
293 | 427 | 483 | (774 | ) | 429 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(2 | ) | 128 | 8 | | 134 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 295 | $ | 299 | $ | 475 | $ | (774 | ) | $ | 295 | |||||||
Spectra Energy Corp Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 (In millions)
| ||||||||||||||||||
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 985 | $ | | $ | 985 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
10 | 1 | 672 | | 683 | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(10 | ) | (1 | ) | 313 | | 302 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
| | 129 | | 129 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
204 | 238 | | (442 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
(2 | ) | | 12 | | 10 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 51 | 105 | | 156 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
| | 15 | | 15 | |||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
192 | 186 | 334 | (442 | ) | 270 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations |
(4 | ) | (18 | ) | 107 | | 85 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 11 | | 11 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 196 | $ | 204 | $ | 238 | $ | (442 | ) | $ | 196 | |||||||
23
Spectra Energy Corp
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(In millions)
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,749 | $ | | $ | 2,749 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
10 | 1 | 1,934 | | 1,945 | |||||||||||||
Gains on sales of other assets and other, net |
| | 32 | | 32 | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(10 | ) | (1 | ) | 847 | | 836 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
| | 452 | | 452 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
670 | 1,027 | | (1,697 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
(2 | ) | 6 | 17 | | 21 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 109 | 198 | | 307 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
| | 33 | | 33 | |||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
658 | 923 | 1,085 | (1,697 | ) | 969 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(4 | ) | 253 | 58 | | 307 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 662 | $ | 670 | $ | 1,027 | $ | (1,697 | ) | $ | 662 | |||||||
Spectra Energy Corp
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
(In millions)
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,386 | $ | | $ | 2,386 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
18 | 1 | 1,646 | | 1,665 | |||||||||||||
Gains on sales of other assets and other, net |
| | 1 | | 1 | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(18 | ) | (1 | ) | 741 | | 722 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
| | 219 | | 219 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
443 | 517 | | (960 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
| (1 | ) | 27 | | 26 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 103 | 208 | | 311 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
| | 31 | | 31 | |||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
425 | 412 | 748 | (960 | ) | 625 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations |
(7 | ) | (31 | ) | 242 | | 204 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 11 | | 11 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 432 | $ | 443 | $ | 517 | $ | (960 | ) | $ | 432 | |||||||
24
Spectra Energy Corp
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2008
(In millions)
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | | $ | 89 | $ | | $ | 89 | ||||||||
Receivables (payables)consolidated subsidiaries |
19 | 254 | (248 | ) | (25 | ) | | |||||||||||
Receivablesother |
9 | 8 | 857 | | 874 | |||||||||||||
Other current assets |
12 | 1 | 543 | | 556 | |||||||||||||
Total current assets |
40 | 263 | 1,241 | (25 | ) | 1,519 | ||||||||||||
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates |
| | 1,924 | | 1,924 | |||||||||||||
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries |
7,998 | 11,553 | | (19,551 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Advances receivable (payable)consolidated subsidiaries |
(1,571 | ) | 2,344 | (773 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 3,880 | | 3,880 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
102 | 390 | 117 | | 609 | |||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| | 14,543 | | 14,543 | |||||||||||||
Regulatory assets and deferred debits |
5 | 12 | 908 | | 925 | |||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 6,574 | $ | 14,562 | $ | 21,840 | $ | (19,576 | ) | $ | 23,400 | |||||||
Accounts payable (receivable)consolidated subsidiaries |
$ | 5 | $ | 42 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Accounts payableother |
2 | 122 | 344 | | 468 | |||||||||||||
Accrued taxes payable (receivable) |
(498 | ) | 470 | 133 | | 105 | ||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 148 | 441 | | 589 | |||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
17 | 1,022 | 666 | | 1,705 | |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
(474 | ) | 1,804 | 1,562 | (25 | ) | 2,867 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| 2,955 | 5,535 | | 8,490 | |||||||||||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities |
179 | 1,805 | 2,570 | | 4,554 | |||||||||||||
Minority interests |
| | 620 | | 620 | |||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
6,869 | 7,998 | 11,553 | (19,551 | ) | 6,869 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 6,574 | $ | 14,562 | $ | 21,840 | $ | (19,576 | ) | $ | 23,400 | |||||||
25
Spectra Energy Corp
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2007
(In millions)
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | | $ | 94 | $ | | $ | 94 | ||||||||
Receivables (payables)consolidated subsidiaries |
(9 | ) | 269 | (255 | ) | (5 | ) | | ||||||||||
Receivablesother |
2 | 8 | 897 | | 907 | |||||||||||||
Other current assets |
8 | 1 | 369 | | 378 | |||||||||||||
Total current assets |
1 | 278 | 1,105 | (5 | ) | 1,379 | ||||||||||||
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates |
| 3 | 1,777 | | 1,780 | |||||||||||||
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries |
7,434 | 10,281 | | (17,715 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Advances receivable (payable)consolidated subsidiaries |
(752 | ) | 2,369 | (1,617 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 3,948 | | 3,948 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
100 | 210 | 321 | | 631 | |||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 2 | 14,298 | | 14,300 | |||||||||||||
Regulatory assets and deferred debits |
5 | 7 | 920 | | 932 | |||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 6,788 | $ | 13,150 | $ | 20,752 | $ | (17,720 | ) | $ | 22,970 | |||||||
Accounts payable (receivable)consolidated subsidiaries |
$ | 5 | $ | 42 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Accounts payableother |
7 | 107 | 249 | | 363 | |||||||||||||
Accrued taxes payable (receivable) |
(278 | ) | 233 | 130 | | 85 | ||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| | 338 | | 338 | |||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
26 | 544 | 1,066 | | 1,636 | |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
(240 | ) | 926 | 1,741 | (5 | ) | 2,422 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| 2,975 | 5,370 | | 8,345 | |||||||||||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities |
171 | 1,815 | 2,554 | | 4,540 | |||||||||||||
Minority interests |
| | 806 | | 806 | |||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
6,857 | 7,434 | 10,281 | (17,715 | ) | 6,857 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 6,788 | $ | 13,150 | $ | 20,752 | $ | (17,720 | ) | $ | 22,970 | |||||||
26
Spectra Energy Corp
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(In millions)
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (187 | ) | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 1,393 | $ | | $ | 1,141 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (105 | ) | (919 | ) | | (1,024 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
187 | 170 | (480 | ) | | (123 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
| | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
| | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| | 94 | | 94 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | | $ | | $ | 89 | $ | | $ | 89 | |||||||||
Spectra Energy Corp Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 (In millions)
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Spectra Energy Corp |
Spectra Capital |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Spectra Energy Corp Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (51 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | 744 | $ | | $ | 654 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| | (504 | ) | | (504 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
51 | 83 | (105 | ) | | 29 | |||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
| | 51 | | 51 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| 44 | 186 | | 230 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| (44 | ) | 343 | | 299 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | | $ | | $ | 529 | $ | | $ | 529 | |||||||||
18. New Accounting Pronouncements
The following new accounting pronouncements were adopted during the six months ended June 30, 2008:
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statement on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 and FSP No. FAS 157-1 by Spectra Energy effective January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on Spectra Energys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. See Note 13 for further discussion. Spectra Energy has elected to defer the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for its goodwill impairment test and the measurement of asset retirement obligations until January 1, 2009 as permitted.
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, which permits entities to choose to measure certain financial instruments at fair value. Spectra Energy has determined it will not elect fair value measurements for financial assets and financial liabilities included in the scope of SFAS No. 159.
EITF 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. In June 2007, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus that a realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid-in capital for the realized income tax benefit from dividends on those awards should be included in the pool of
27
excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11 was applied to the income tax benefits that result from dividends on equity-classified employee share-based payment awards that are declared after December 31, 2007. The effect of adopting EITF 06-11 was not material to Spectra Energys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows as of and for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and is not expected to be material to future periods.
The following new accounting pronouncements have been issued, but have not yet been adopted as of June 30, 2008:
SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all and only the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and cannot be early adopted.
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 which requires all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 eliminates the diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited.
When adopting the presentation and disclosure items, retrospective application to conform previously reported financial statements to the new presentation requirements is required. Changes to reflect the new measurement guidance for increases or decreases in ownership and other changes must be done prospectively. The new requirements for noncontrolling interests, results of operations and comprehensive income of subsidiaries change the presentation of operating results, related per-share information, and equity. SFAS No. 160 requires net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for both the controlling and the noncontrolling interests. Additional required disclosures and reconciliations include a separate schedule that shows the effects of any transactions with the noncontrolling interests on the equity attributable to the controlling interest.
Spectra Energy continues to examine the balances previously reflected as minority interests on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and of the amount of minority interest net income previously reflected within net income. Spectra Energy cannot currently estimate the full effect that this standard will have on its historical or future consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 which amends and expands the disclosure requirements for SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements an enhanced understanding of how and why derivative instruments are used, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008.
FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3 which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Spectra Energy does not expect the adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
19. Subsequent Events
On July 16, 2008, Westcoast issued 250 million Canadian dollars (approximately $250 million) aggregate principal amount of 5.60% Medium Term Notes due January 16, 2019. The net proceeds of the offering were used for general corporate purposes.
On July 31, 2008, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC paid $288 million to retire its outstanding bonds and bank debt, and an additional $54 million early-extinguishment premium for the bonds. The premium will be amortized through 2019, the original maturity of the bonds.
28
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
INTRODUCTION
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Executive Overview
For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Spectra Energy reported net income of $295 million and $196 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Spectra Energy reported net income of $662 million and $432 million, respectively. The increase in net income for the three and six-month periods primarily reflects the positive impact of higher NGL prices, which correlate to higher crude oil prices, during the first half of 2008 on the earnings from Field Services. Crude oil averaged $124 per barrel in second quarter 2008 versus $65 per barrel during the same period 2007.
The highlights for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 include:
| U.S. Transmissions earnings benefited from completed expansion projects and a customer bankruptcy settlement, partially offset by higher project development costs charged to expense; |
| Distribution results reflect a stronger Canadian dollar and higher storage and transportation revenues, partially offset by a provision recorded as a result of a decision from the OEB related to unregulated storage revenues; |
| Western Canada Transmission & Processing earnings increased primarily as a result of stronger NGL prices related to the Empress processing plant and a stronger Canadian dollar; |
| Field Services earnings reflect higher NGL prices, improved efficiencies and higher volumes, partially offset by mark to market losses from NGL hedges at DCP Midstream Partners, LP (DCP Midstreams master limited partnership); |
| Results for Other decreased primarily due to higher captive insurance and benefit costs in 2008 and a benefit recognized in the 2007 first quarter as a result of a favorable resolution of a legal matter. |
Spectra Energy reported $930 million of capital and investment expenditures in the first six months of 2008 of the approximately $2.5 billion that is projected for the full year, including maintenance capital. As Spectra Energy executes on its strategic objectives, expansion expenditures could average more than $1 billion per year over the next few years.
Through July 2008, Spectra Energy has issued approximately $950 million of new long-term debt and expects to issue additional debt during 2008, the amount of which depends on market conditions and the timing of cash requirements.
On May 6, 2008, Spectra Energys Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing Spectra Energy to purchase in the aggregate up to $600 million of shares of its outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under the approved plan totaled $284 million as of June 30, 2008.
On July 3, 2008, Spectra Energy declared a 9% increase in its quarterly dividend from $0.23 to $0.25 per common share. The new annual dividends are $1.00 per share, representing a nearly 14% increase over the 2007 annualized level of $0.88 per share.
29
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 1,141 | $ | 985 | $ | 2,749 | $ | 2,386 | ||||
Operating expenses |
834 | 683 | 1,945 | 1,665 | ||||||||
Gains on sales of other assets and other, net |
32 | | 32 | 1 | ||||||||
Operating income |
339 | 302 | 836 | 722 | ||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
253 | 139 | 473 | 245 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
149 | 156 | 307 | 311 | ||||||||
Minority interest expense |
14 | 15 | 33 | 31 | ||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
429 | 270 | 969 | 625 | ||||||||
Income tax expense from continuing operations |
134 | 85 | 307 | 204 | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
295 | 185 | 662 | 421 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 11 | | 11 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 295 | $ | 196 | $ | 662 | $ | 432 | ||||
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. Operating revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $156 million or 16%, and $363 million or 15%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increases were driven primarily by:
| higher NGL prices associated with the Empress operations, |
| the effects of a stronger Canadian dollar on revenues at Western Canada Transmission & Processing and Distribution, and |
| expansion projects placed in service in late 2007 at U.S. Transmission and Distribution. |
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $151 million or 22%, and $280 million or 17%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increases were driven primarily by:
| higher prices and volumes of natural gas purchased for the Empress facility, |
| the effects of a stronger Canadian dollar at Western Canada Transmission & Processing and Distribution, and |
| an increase in project development costs as a result of the capitalization of previously expensed costs on northeast expansions in 2007 at U.S. Transmission. |
For a more detailed discussion of operating revenues and expenses, see the segment discussions that follow.
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. Gains on sales of other assets and other, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $32 million and $31 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increases were primarily due to a 2008 second quarter customer bankruptcy settlement.
Operating Income. Operating income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $37 million, or 12%, and $114 million, or 16%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007 primarily as a result of higher NGL prices that benefited the Empress operations, a stronger Canadian dollar, a 2008 customer bankruptcy settlement and higher earnings from expansion projects.
Other Income and Expenses, net. Other income and expenses, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $114 million and $228 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase represents higher equity in earnings from the Field Services segment, primarily reflecting higher commodity prices in 2008 compared to 2007.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $7 million and $4 million, respectively, compared to the same period in 2007 primarily as a result of lower interest rates on commercial paper and higher interest costs capitalized. These decreases were partially offset by a stronger Canadian dollar.
30
Income Tax Expense from Continuing Operations. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $49 million and $103 million, respectively, as a result of higher earnings from continuing operations. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the effective tax rate was 31.2%, in line with the same period in 2007, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, the effective tax rate was 31.7% compared to 32.6% for the same period in 2007, reflecting lower Canadian provincial tax rates in the 2008 period.
Income from Discontinued Operations, net of tax. Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $11 million recognized in the second quarter of 2007 represents proceeds received from a litigation settlement in the second quarter of 2007.
Segment Results
Management evaluates segment performance based on EBIT from continuing operations, after deducting minority interest expense related to those earnings. On a segment basis, EBIT excludes discontinued operations, represents all profits from continuing operations (both operating and non-operating) before deducting interest and taxes, and is net of the minority interest expense related to those profits. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are managed centrally by Spectra Energy, so the gains and losses on foreign currency transactions, and interest and dividend income on those balances, are excluded from the segments EBIT. Management considers segment EBIT to be a good indicator of each segments operating performance from its continuing operations, as it represents the results of Spectra Energys ownership interest in operations without regard to financing methods or capital structures.
Spectra Energys segment EBIT may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because other companies may not calculate EBIT in the same manner. Segment EBIT is summarized in the following table, and detailed discussions follow.
EBIT by Business Segment
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Transmission |
$ | 244 | $ | 223 | $ | 470 | $ | 443 | ||||||||
Distribution |
54 | 54 | 219 | 198 | ||||||||||||
Western Canada Transmission & Processing |
87 | 48 | 218 | 122 | ||||||||||||
Field Services |
216 | 123 | 408 | 205 | ||||||||||||
Total reportable segment EBIT |
601 | 448 | 1,315 | 968 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(28 | ) | (26 | ) | (48 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||
Total reportable segment and other EBIT |
573 | 422 | 1,267 | 927 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
149 | 156 | 307 | 311 | ||||||||||||
Interest income and other (a) |
5 | 4 | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 429 | $ | 270 | $ | 969 | $ | 625 | ||||||||
(a) | Includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses, additional minority interest expense not allocated to the segment results and intersegment eliminations. |
Minority interest expense as presented in the following segment-level discussions includes only minority interest expense related to EBIT of non-wholly owned entities. It does not include minority interest expense related to interest and taxes of those operations. The amounts discussed below include intercompany transactions that are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
31
U.S. Transmission
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||
(in millions, except where noted) | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 400 | $ | 370 | $ | 30 | $ | 803 | $ | 747 | $ | 56 | |||||||
Operating expenses |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating, maintenance and other |
151 | 97 | 54 | 277 | 202 | 75 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
58 | 52 | 6 | 116 | 105 | 11 | |||||||||||||
Gains on sales of other assets and other, net |
32 | | 32 | 32 | 1 | 31 | |||||||||||||
Operating income |
223 | 221 | 2 | 442 | 441 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
34 | 11 | 23 | 55 | 22 | 33 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
13 | 9 | 4 | 27 | 20 | 7 | |||||||||||||
EBIT |
$ | 244 | $ | 223 | $ | 21 | $ | 470 | $ | 443 | $ | 27 | |||||||
Proportional throughput, Tbtu (a) |
476 | 502 | (26 | ) | 1,113 | 1,110 | 3 |
(a) | Trillion British thermal units. Revenues are not significantly affected by pipeline throughput fluctuations, since revenues are primarily composed of demand charges. |
Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. The $30 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $16 million increase from expansion projects placed in service in late 2007, |
| a $6 million increase in processing revenues associated with pipeline operations, primarily from higher NGL prices, and |
| a $3 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, related to M&N LP. |
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The $54 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $26 million increase in project development costs as a result of the capitalization of previously expensed costs on northeast expansions in 2007. Of the $26 million, $10 million represents expensed project development costs in 2008, while 2007 included a $16 million net benefit in expenses due to the capitalization of costs during that period. In accordance with Spectra Energys policy, project development costs are initially expensed until it is determined that recovery of such costs through regulated revenues of the completed project is probable, at which time inception-to-date costs of the project are capitalized and operating expenses are reduced, |
| a $13 million increase in transmission and storage operations costs, including costs for pipeline integrity, fuel, utilities and equipment repairs, and |
| a $10 million increase in ad valorem taxes primarily as a result of favorable valuation adjustments in 2007. |
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. The $32 million reflects a customer bankruptcy settlement in June 2008.
Other Income and Expenses, net. The $23 million increase was primarily a result of higher equity income from unconsolidated affiliates attributable to the capitalization of interest on construction projects and $8 million of lower project development costs charged to expenses, both of which are primarily for the Southeast Supply Header project.
EBIT. The $21 million increase reflects a customer bankruptcy settlement, and higher earnings as a result of capitalized interest. These increases were partially offset by an increase in project development costs charged to expense and increased transmission and storage operations costs.
Six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. The $56 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $31 million increase from expansion projects placed in service in late 2007, |
| an $18 million increase in processing revenues associated with pipeline operations, primarily from higher NGL prices, and |
| a $9 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, related to M&N LP. |
32
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The $75 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $42 million increase in project development costs as a result of the capitalization of previously expensed costs on northeast expansions in 2007. Of the $42 million, $16 million represents expensed project development costs in 2008, while 2007 included a $26 million net benefit in expenses due to the capitalization of costs during that period, |
| an $18 million increase in transmission and storage operations costs, including costs for pipeline integrity, fuel, utilities, equipment repairs, labor and outside services, and |
| a $12 million increase in ad valorem taxes primarily as a result of favorable valuations in 2007. |
Depreciation and Amortization. The $11 million increase was driven primarily by expansion projects placed into service in 2007.
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. The $31 million reflects a customer bankruptcy settlement in June 2008.
Other Income and Expenses, net. The $33 million increase was primarily a result of higher equity income from unconsolidated affiliates attributable to the capitalization of interest on construction projects and $11 million of lower project development costs charged to expenses, both of which are primarily for the Southeast Supply Header project.
Minority Interest Expense. The $7 million increase was driven primarily by earnings from Spectra Energy Partners formed in July 2007.
EBIT. The $27 million increase reflects a gain on a customer bankruptcy settlement, higher earnings from expansion projects and higher commodity prices for gas processing associated with pipeline operations. These increases were partially offset by an increase in project development costs charged to expense and increased transmission and storage operations costs.
Distribution
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||
(in millions, except where noted) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 353 | $ | 351 | $ | 2 | $ | 1,153 | $ | 1,064 | $ | 89 | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas purchased |
158 | 174 | (16 | ) | 650 | 628 | 22 | |||||||||||||
Operating, maintenance and other |
94 | 83 | 11 | 191 | 161 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
46 | 40 | 6 | 93 | 77 | 16 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
55 | 54 | 1 | 219 | 198 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
EBIT |
$ | 54 | $ | 54 | $ | | $ | 219 | $ | 198 | $ | 21 | ||||||||
Number of customers (thousands) |
1,296 | 1,276 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||
Heating degree days (Fahrenheit) |
899 | 883 | 16 | 4,550 | 4,474 | 76 | ||||||||||||||
Pipeline throughput, Tbtu |
151 | 153 | (2 | ) | 479 | 453 | 26 |
Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. The $2 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $31 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, |
| a $12 million increase in storage and transportation revenues primarily due to favorable market conditions and growth of the transmission system, and |
| a $7 million increase due to growth in the number of customers, offset by |
| a $26 million decrease in customer usage of natural gas, |
| a $15 million decrease due to an unfavorable decision from the OEB related to unregulated storage revenues, and |
| a $10 million decrease from lower natural gas prices passed through to customers without a mark-up. |
33
Natural Gas Purchased. The $16 million decrease was driven primarily by:
| a $22 million decrease in customer usage of natural gas, and |
| a $10 million decrease related to lower natural gas prices passed through to customers without a mark-up, partially offset by |
| a $14 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| a $6 million increase due to growth in the number of customers. |
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The $11 million increase was driven primarily by a stronger Canadian dollar.
Depreciation and Amortization. The $6 million increase was driven by:
| a $3 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| a $3 million increase due to a higher asset base resulting primarily from completion of Phase II of the Dawn-Trafalgar expansion. |
EBIT. EBIT was unchanged compared with the second quarter of 2007. Higher storage and transportation revenues and a stronger Canadian dollar were offset by an unfavorable decision from the OEB related to unregulated storage revenues.
Six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. The $89 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $145 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, |
| a $25 million increase due to growth in the number of customers, and |
| a $19 million increase in storage and transportation revenues primarily due to favorable market conditions and growth of the transmission system, partially offset by |
| a $74 million decrease from lower natural gas prices passed through to customers without a mark-up, |
| a $15 million decrease due to an unfavorable decision from the OEB on unregulated storage revenues, and |
| an $8 million decrease in customer usage of natural gas. |
Natural Gas Purchased. The $22 million increase was driven primarily by:
| an $84 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| a $25 million increase due to growth in the number of customers, partially offset by |
| a $74 million decrease related to lower natural gas prices passed through to customers without a mark-up, and |
| a $9 million decrease in customer usage of natural gas. |
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The $30 million increase was driven primarily by a stronger Canadian dollar.
Depreciation and Amortization. The $16 million increase was driven by:
| a $10 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| a $6 million increase due to a higher asset base resulting primarily from completion of Phase II of the Dawn-Trafalgar expansion. |
EBIT. The $21 million increase was primarily attributable to a stronger Canadian dollar and higher storage and transportation revenues, partially offset by an unfavorable decision from the OEB related to unregulated storage revenues.
34
Western Canada Transmission & Processing
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except where noted) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 388 | $ | 262 | $ | 126 | $ | 793 | $ | 573 | $ | 220 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and petroleum products purchased |
118 | 64 | 54 | 248 | 173 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating, maintenance and other |
138 | 109 | 29 | 245 | 204 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
42 | 34 | 8 | 79 | 66 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
90 | 55 | 35 | 221 | 130 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | 1 | 1 | 1 | | ||||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
1 | 4 | (3 | ) | 4 | 9 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
EBIT |
$ | 87 | $ | 48 | $ | 39 | $ | 218 | $ | 122 | $ | 96 | ||||||||||
Pipeline throughput, Tbtu |
142 | 131 | 11 | 304 | 292 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
Volumes processed, Tbtu |
170 | 169 | 1 | 343 | 348 | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Empress inlet volumes, Tbtu |
208 | 141 | 67 | 425 | 333 | 92 |
Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. The $126 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $77 million increase due to higher NGL sales prices and volumes associated with the Empress operations, |
| a $31 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, |
| a $12 million increase in pipeline revenues as a result of higher rates effective January 2008 that are expected to be reduced prospectively as a result of a pending rate settlement with customers, and |
| a $7 million increase mainly due to higher processing volumes in the Pine River area of northeastern British Columbia. |
Natural Gas and Petroleum Products Purchased. The $54 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $45 million increase from higher prices and volumes of natural gas purchased for the Empress facility, and |
| a $9 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar. |
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The $29 million increase was driven primarily by:
| an $11 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| an $8 million increase in plant fuel and electricity costs at the Empress facility. |
Depreciation and Amortization. The $8 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $4 million increase due to increased depreciation rates as a result of a new pipeline rate settlement as well as capital additions, and |
| a $3 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar. |
EBIT. The $39 million increase was driven primarily by stronger NGL prices and volumes, net of higher plant fuel and electricity costs, that benefited the Empress operations, a stronger Canadian dollar and higher processing revenues.
Six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
Operating Revenues. The $220 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $114 million increase primarily due to higher NGL sales prices associated with the Empress operations, |
| a $90 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, |
| an $11 million increase in pipeline revenues as a result of higher rates effective January 2008 that are expected to be reduced prospectively as a result of a pending rate settlement with customers, and |
| a $9 million increase mainly due to higher processing volumes in the Pine River area of northeastern British Columbia. |
35
Natural Gas and Petroleum Products Purchased. The $75 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $47 million increase mainly from higher prices and volumes of natural gas purchased for the Empress facility, and |
| a $28 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar. |
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The $41 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $27 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| an $8 million increase in plant fuel and electricity costs at the Empress facility. |
Depreciation and Amortization. The $13 million increase was driven primarily by:
| a $9 million increase resulting from a stronger Canadian dollar, and |
| a $5 million increase due to increased depreciation rates as a result of a new pipeline rate settlement as well as capital additions. |
Minority Interest Expense. The $5 million decrease was driven primarily by the purchase of the Income Fund in the second quarter of 2008. Prior to the acquisition, the Income Fund indirectly held 54% of Spectra Energys consolidated Midstream operations and Westcoast indirectly held the remaining 46%.
EBIT. The $96 million increase was driven primarily by higher NGL prices, net of higher plant fuel and electricity cost, that benefited the Empress operations and a stronger Canadian dollar.
Field Services
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||
(in millions, except where noted) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Operating loss |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
217 | 123 | 94 | 408 | 205 | 203 | ||||||||||||||
EBIT |
$ | 216 | $ | 123 | $ | 93 | $ | 408 | $ | 205 | $ | 203 | ||||||||
Natural gas gathered and processed/transported, Tbtu/d (a,b) |
7.5 | 6.9 | 0.6 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||
NGL production, MBbl/d (a,c) |
375 | 362 | 13 | 378 | 354 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
Average natural gas price per MMBtu (d) |
$ | 10.92 | $ | 7.55 | $ | 3.37 | $ | 9.48 | $ | 7.16 | $ | 2.32 | ||||||||
Average NGL price per gallon (e) |
$ | 1.49 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.46 |
(a) | Reflects 100% of volumes |
(b) | Trillion British thermal units per day |
(c) | Thousand barrels per day |
(d) | Million British thermal units. Average price based on NYMEX Henry Hub. |
(e) | Does not reflect results of commodity hedges |
Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
EBIT. Higher equity in earnings of $94 million were primarily the result of the following variances, each representing Spectra Energys 50% ownership portion of the earnings drivers at DCP Midstream:
| a $128 million increase from commodity-sensitive processing arrangements due to increased commodity prices, and |
| a $17 million increase in gathering and processing margins primarily attributable to increased NGL volumes, contract renegotiations and improved system efficiencies, partially offset by |
| a $23 million decrease in earnings from DCP Midstream Partners as a result of mark to market losses on hedges used to protect distributable cash flows, |
| a $21 million decrease in marketing margins related to timing, |
| a $5 million decrease due to higher net interest expense resulting from the increased debt associated with acquisitions in 2007, and |
36
| a $3 million decrease resulting primarily from higher depreciation expense primarily attributable to asset acquisitions, partially offset by decreased general and administrative costs as a result of $3 million of costs in 2007 associated with DCP Midstreams initiative to create stand alone corporate functions separate from its two partners. |
Six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
EBIT. Higher equity in earnings of $203 million were primarily the result of the following variances, each representing Spectra Energys 50% ownership portion of the earnings drivers at DCP Midstream:
| a $236 million increase from commodity-sensitive processing arrangements, due to increased commodity prices, and |
| a $39 million increase in gathering and processing margins primarily attributable to NGL volumes due to improved plant efficiencies and increased natural gas volumes, partially due to lower natural gas volumes in 2007 from the effects of severe weather, partially offset by |
| a $29 million decrease in earnings from DCP Midstream Partners as a result of mark to market losses on hedges used to protect distributable cash flows, |
| a $26 million decrease in marketing margins related to timing, |
| an $11 million decrease resulting from higher operating costs primarily for increased repair and maintenance costs, asset integrity and growth, and higher depreciation expense primarily attributable to asset acquisitions, partially offset by decreased general and administrative costs as a result of $6 million of costs in 2007 associated with DCP Midstreams initiative to create stand alone corporate function separate from its two partners, and |
| a $10 million decrease due to higher net interest expense resulting from the increased debt associated with acquisitions in 2007. |
Other
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
2008 | 2007 | Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except where noted) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 12 | $ | 8 | $ | 4 | $ | 21 | $ | 15 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
38 | 34 | 4 | 66 | 60 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(26 | ) | (26 | ) | | (45 | ) | (45 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other income and expenses, net |
(2 | ) | | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | 4 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
EBIT |
$ | (28 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (48 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | ||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
EBIT. The 2007 period included $7 million of costs associated with the spin-off of Spectra Energy. The increase in net costs comparing 2008 and 2007 was primarily attributable to higher insurance and benefit costs in 2008.
Six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007
EBIT. The $7 million increase in net costs reflects a benefit recognized from the favorable resolution of a legal matter in the first quarter of 2007, as well as higher benefit and other corporate costs when comparing the periods. The 2007 period also included $11 million of costs associated with the spin-off of Spectra Energy.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $487 million to $1,141 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This change was driven primarily by:
| an increase of $320 million in distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates in 2008, primarily from DCP Midstream, and |
| a January 2007 payment of $100 million, which was accrued at December 31, 2006, to resolve certain litigation matters associated with discontinued LNG operations. |
37
Net working capital was negative $1,348 million as of June 30, 2008, which included notes payable and commercial paper totaling $667 million and current maturities of long-term debt of $589 million. Spectra Energy will rely upon cash flows from operations and additional financing transactions to fund its liquidity and capital requirements for the next 12 months including issuances of short-term and long-term debt. See also Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity for discussions of effective shelf registrations, available credit facilities and new debt issuances.
Investing Cash Flows
Cash flows used in investing activities increased $520 million to $1,024 million in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This change was driven primarily by:
| a $412 million increase in capital and investment expenditures in 2008 as a result of expansion projects underway at each of Spectra Energys segments, and |
| the $274 million acquisition on May 1, 2008 of the units of the Income Fund that were held by non-affiliated holders, partially offset by |
| distributions received from DCP Midstream of $148 million in 2008 representing a return of capital. |
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
(in millions) | ||||||
Capital and Investment Expenditures |
||||||
U.S. Transmission |
$ | 680 | $ | 318 | ||
Distribution |
159 | 114 | ||||
Western Canada Transmission & Processing |
75 | 68 | ||||
Other |
16 | 18 | ||||
Total |
$ | 930 | $ | 518 | ||
Capital and investment expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2008 consisted of $773 million for expansion projects and $157 million for maintenance and other projects.
Spectra Energy continues to project 2008 capital and investment expenditures of approximately $2.5 billion, consisting of approximately $1.5 billion for U.S. Transmission, $0.4 billion for Distribution and $0.6 billion for Western Canada Transmission & Processing. These expenditures exclude the Income Fund acquisition. Total projected 2008 capital and investment expenditures include approximately $2.0 billion of expansion capital expenditures and $0.5 billion for maintenance and upgrades of existing plants, pipelines and infrastructure to serve growth. Spectra Energy remains on track to place into service approximately $1.6 billion of capital expansion projects in 2008.
Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $123 million in the first six months of 2008 compared to $29 million net cash provided by financing activities in the first six months of 2007. This change was driven primarily by:
| a $366 million increase in short-term borrowings in 2007 compared to a $48 million decrease in 2008, and |
| the repurchases of Spectra Energy common shares in 2008 of $284 million, partially offset by |
| net issuances of long-term debt in 2008 of $497 million. |
Available Credit Facilities and Restrictive Debt Covenants. Commercial paper markets in the U.S. and Canada have recently experienced varying degrees of volatility, primarily due to market concerns about asset-backed commercial paper and sub-prime mortgage exposures. Spectra Energys commercial paper is not asset-backed or related to real estate financing, and as such, Spectra Energy has continued to successfully issue commercial paper as needed.
38
See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of available credit facilities and related financial and other covenants.
Credit Ratings. The short-term and long-term debt of Spectra Energy and certain subsidiaries are rated by Standard & Poors (S&P), Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) and Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS).
Standard and Poors |
Moodys Investor Service |
Dominion Bond Rating Service | ||||
Credit Ratings Summary as of July 31, 2008 |
||||||
Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (a) |
BBB+ | Baa1 | Not applicable | |||
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (a) |
BBB+ | A3 | Not applicable | |||
Westcoast Energy, Inc. (a) |
BBB+ | Not applicable | A (low) | |||
Union Gas (a) |
BBB+ | Not applicable | A | |||
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LP (b) |
A | A2 | A |
(a) | Represents senior unsecured credit rating |
(b) | Represents senior secured credit rating |
The above credit ratings are dependent upon, among other factors, the ability to generate sufficient cash to fund capital and investment expenditures, while maintaining the strength of the current balance sheets. These credit ratings could be negatively impacted if, as a result of market conditions or other factors, they are unable to maintain the current balance sheet strength or if earnings or cash flow outlooks deteriorate materially.
Dividends. Spectra Energy currently anticipates a dividend payout ratio of approximately 60% of estimated annual net income per share of common stock. The declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the sole discretion of Spectra Energys Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including the financial condition, earnings and capital requirements of our operating subsidiaries, covenants associated with certain debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. On July 3, 2008, Spectra Energy declared a 9% increase in its quarterly dividend from $0.23 to $0.25 per common share. The new annual dividends are $1.00 per share, representing a nearly 14% increase over the 2007 annualized level of $0.88 per share.
Other Financing Matters. Spectra Energy has an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC to register the issuance of unspecified amounts of various equity and debt securities by Spectra Energy. In addition, as of the date of this filing, subsidiaries of Spectra Energy had 560 million Canadian dollars (approximately $560 million) available under shelf registrations for issuances in the Canadian market. Of the 560 million Canadian dollars available under these shelf registrations, 110 million expires August 20, 2008 and 450 million expires in August 2010. The expiring shelf registration is expected to be replaced upon expiration.
As previously discussed, Spectra Energys Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing Spectra Energy to purchase in the aggregate up to $600 million of shares of its outstanding common stock. As of June 30, 2008, 10,500,172 shares had been repurchased at a cost of $284 million. Significant purchases were completed in July 2008 and Spectra Energy expects to complete the repurchase of the $600 million of shares during August 2008.
On July 16, 2008, Westcoast issued 250 million Canadian dollars (approximately $250 million) aggregate principal amount of 5.60% Medium Term Notes due 2019. Net proceeds from the offering were used for general corporate purposes.
On July 31, 2008, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC paid $288 million to retire its outstanding bonds and bank debt, and an additional $54 million early-extinguishment premium for the bonds.
OTHER ISSUES
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 18 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
39
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
In Item 7A of Spectra Energys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Spectra Energy estimated its 2008 NGL-related oil price sensitivity at approximately $135 million of annual pre-tax earnings per a $10 move in oil prices at Spectra Energys forecasted NGL-to-oil price relationship. However, NGL prices have lagged oil prices during oils unprecedented upward price movement this year. Assuming crude oil prices average approximately $100 per barrel, each 1% change in the price relationship between NGLs and crude oil would change Spectra Energys annual pre-tax earnings by approximately $18 million. At crude oil prices above $100 per barrel, the impact of a 1% change in the crude oil/NGL relationship would increase, and at crude oil prices below $100 per barrel, the impact of a 1% change in the crude oil/NGL relationship would decrease.
Other than described above, management believes Spectra Energys exposure to market risk has not changed materially at June 30, 2008.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Spectra Energy in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Spectra Energy in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Spectra Energy has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2008, and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Spectra Energy has evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
For information regarding material legal proceedings, see Note 14 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be given to the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in Spectra Energys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect Spectra Energys financial condition or future results. There were no changes to those risk factors at June 30, 2008.
40
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs | ||||||
April 1 April 30, 2008 |
| | | | ||||||
May 1 May 31, 2008 |
3,139,665 | $ | 27.10 | 3,139,665 | | |||||
June 1 June 30, 2008 |
7,360,507 | 26.96 | 7,360,507 | | ||||||
Total April 1 June 30, 2008 |
10,500,172 | 27.00 | 10,500,172 | $ | 316,481,961 | |||||
(a) | On May 6, 2008, Spectra Energys Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $600 million. Purchases of Spectra Energy common stock under the program may be made from time to time in the open market. The program does not have an expiration date; however, significant purchases were completed in July 2008 and Spectra Energy expects to complete the repurchase of the $600 million of shares during August 2008. |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
At the Spectra Energy Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 8, 2008, shareholders elected Paul M. Anderson, Austin A. Adams, F. Anthony Comper and Michael McShane to serve as Class II directors until the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders and until such Directors successor is duly elected and qualified. Below is a tabulation of votes with respect to each nominee for director at the meeting:
Nominee |
For | Against/ Withheld | ||
Paul M. Anderson |
522,939,292 | 19,102,447 | ||
Austin A. Adams |
527,034,280 | 15,007,459 | ||
F. Anthony Comper |
526,876,027 | 15,165,712 | ||
Michael McShane |
526,762,737 | 15,279,002 |
In addition, shareholders at the meeting approved the Spectra Energy Corp 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Spectra Energy Corp Executive Short-Term Incentive plan, and ratified the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as Spectra Energys independent registered public accounting firm for 2008. Below is a tabulation of votes with respect to each proposal:
Proposal |
For | Against | Abstain | |||
Approval of the Spectra Energy Corp 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan |
488,490,177 | 47,126,677 | 6,419,444 | |||
Approval of the Spectra Energy Corp Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan |
513,413,226 | 21,718,873 | 6,904,865 | |||
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2008 |
534,857,170 | 2,484,907 | 4,699,661 |
41
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit |
||
+*10.1 | Form of Phantom Stock Award Agreement pursuant to the Spectra Energy Corp 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan | |
+*10.2 | Form of Performance Award Agreement pursuant to the Spectra Energy Corp 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan | |
*31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
+ | Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
* | Filed herewith. |
The total amount of securities of the registrant or its subsidiaries authorized under any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an exhibit does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The registrant agrees, upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to furnish copies of any or all of such instruments to it.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SPECTRA ENERGY CORP | ||
Date: August 8, 2008 | /s/ Fred J. Fowler | |
Fred J. Fowler | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: August 8, 2008 | /s/ Gregory L. Ebel | |
Gregory L. Ebel | ||
Group Executive and Chief Financial Officer |
42