littlefield10q093012.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2012
|
Commission file number 0-24805
|
LITTLEFIELD CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
74-2723809
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
2501 N. Lamar Blvd.
Austin, Texas 78705
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number:
(512) 476-5141
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller Reporting Company x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
On November 7, 2012, 17,399,727 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended September 30, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a)
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
d)
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
e)
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
502,596 |
|
|
$ |
1,650,634 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $22,200 and $22,200, respectively
|
|
|
402,884 |
|
|
|
548,338 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
339,902 |
|
|
|
233,984 |
|
Note receivable – current portion
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
1,320,382 |
|
|
|
2,507,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment – at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,054,097 |
|
|
|
7,299,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,921,890 |
|
|
|
5,921,890 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,281,101 |
|
|
|
1,392,351 |
|
Note receivable, net
|
|
|
84,404 |
|
|
|
163,290 |
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
358,106 |
|
|
|
315,004 |
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
7,645,501 |
|
|
|
7,792,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
16,019,980 |
|
|
$ |
17,599,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, current portion
|
|
$ |
519,691 |
|
|
$ |
525,939 |
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
221,712 |
|
|
|
250,893 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,067,687 |
|
|
|
1,046,904 |
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
1,809,090 |
|
|
|
1,823,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,891,917 |
|
|
|
3,268,643 |
|
Other liabilities, related party
|
|
|
172,992 |
|
|
|
130,224 |
|
Total Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
3,064,909 |
|
|
|
3,398,867 |
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
4,873,999 |
|
|
|
5,222,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, (authorized 40,000,000 shares, issued 18,817,406 shares and 18,817,406 shares, respectively, outstanding 17,399,727 shares and 17,337,901 shares, respectively)
|
|
|
18,818 |
|
|
|
18,818 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
31,357,657 |
|
|
|
31,310,859 |
|
Treasury stock – 1,417,679 and 1,479,505 shares, at cost
|
|
|
(1,350,831 |
) |
|
|
(1,409,566 |
) |
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(18,879,663 |
) |
|
|
(17,543,098 |
) |
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
11,145,981 |
|
|
|
12,377,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
$ |
16,019,980 |
|
|
$ |
17,599,616 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
|
|
$ |
1,626,610 |
|
|
$ |
2,201,979 |
|
Other
|
|
|
26,654 |
|
|
|
21,400 |
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
|
|
1,653,264 |
|
|
|
2,223,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECT COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct salaries and other compensation
|
|
|
233,234 |
|
|
|
181,608 |
|
Rent and utilities
|
|
|
719,543 |
|
|
|
749,473 |
|
Other direct operating costs
|
|
|
494,704 |
|
|
|
432,049 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
245,754 |
|
|
|
234,626 |
|
License expense
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
14,089 |
|
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
1,704,035 |
|
|
|
1,611,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS MARGIN
|
|
|
(50,771 |
) |
|
|
611,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and other compensation
|
|
|
227,856 |
|
|
|
324,124 |
|
Legal and accounting fees
|
|
|
138,927 |
|
|
|
229,798 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18,832 |
|
|
|
20,743 |
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
19,322 |
|
|
|
25,468 |
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
122,717 |
|
|
|
184,290 |
|
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
527,654 |
|
|
|
784,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERMINATION COSTS
|
|
|
309,565 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
(887,990 |
) |
|
|
(172,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(36,148 |
) |
|
|
(40,715 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
(34,277 |
) |
|
|
(36,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(922,267 |
) |
|
|
(209,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
(930,667 |
) |
|
$ |
(214,625 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
|
|
|
17,340,589 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
|
|
|
17,340,589 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
|
|
$ |
6,320,089 |
|
|
$ |
7,206,466 |
|
Other
|
|
|
79,592 |
|
|
|
65,732 |
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
|
|
6,399,681 |
|
|
|
7,272,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECT COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct salaries and other compensation
|
|
|
845,041 |
|
|
|
564,538 |
|
Rent and utilities
|
|
|
2,158,110 |
|
|
|
2,230,973 |
|
Other direct operating costs
|
|
|
1,465,851 |
|
|
|
1,364,638 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
744,327 |
|
|
|
695,391 |
|
License expense
|
|
|
69,890 |
|
|
|
63,446 |
|
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
5,283,219 |
|
|
|
4,918,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS MARGIN
|
|
|
1,116,462 |
|
|
|
2,353,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and other compensation
|
|
|
951,334 |
|
|
|
1,013,158 |
|
Legal and accounting fees
|
|
|
419,152 |
|
|
|
545,398 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58,540 |
|
|
|
60,650 |
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
78,961 |
|
|
|
91,002 |
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
497,123 |
|
|
|
640,647 |
|
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
2,005,110 |
|
|
|
2,350,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERMINATION COSTS
|
|
|
309,565 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
(1,198,213 |
) |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4,740 |
|
|
|
12,812 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(110,911 |
) |
|
|
(113,438 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(3,931 |
) |
|
|
(1,549 |
) |
TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
(110,102 |
) |
|
|
(102,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(1,308,315 |
) |
|
|
(99,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
28,250 |
|
|
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
(1,336,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,357 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
|
|
|
17,338,804 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
|
|
|
17,338,804 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,336,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,357 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
802,867 |
|
|
|
756,041 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
78,961 |
|
|
|
91,002 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposals of equipment
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash flows as a result of changes in asset and liability
account balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
145,454 |
|
|
|
171,341 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(130,251 |
) |
|
|
(114,129 |
) |
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
(29,182 |
) |
|
|
(96,043 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
72,748 |
|
|
|
26,557 |
|
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(392,037 |
) |
|
|
693,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(451,913 |
) |
|
|
(895,751 |
) |
Purchase of goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
(409,752 |
) |
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable, net
|
|
|
78,886 |
|
|
|
78,886 |
|
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(373,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,226,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(382,974 |
) |
|
|
(398,218 |
) |
Proceeds from note payable
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(382,974 |
) |
|
|
(188,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(1,148,038 |
) |
|
|
(720,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
1,650,634 |
|
|
|
2,915,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
502,596 |
|
|
$ |
2,194,241 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Littlefield Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
110,911 |
|
|
$ |
113,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
35,178 |
|
|
$ |
68,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of treasury stock under deferred compensation plan
|
|
$ |
20,718 |
|
|
$ |
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
$ |
5,854 |
|
|
$ |
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment in exchange for notes payable
|
|
$ |
--- |
|
|
$ |
637,057 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 1 – PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Littlefield Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). The financial statements contained herein are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Where appropriate, items within the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to maintain consistency and comparability for all periods presented.
The operating results for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. Except for historical information contained herein, certain matters set forth in this report are forward looking statements that are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, including the impact of government regulation and taxation, customer attendance and spending, competition, and general economic conditions, among others. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries that are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” and “intend” and words or phrases of similar import, as they relate to the Company or its subsidiaries or Company management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current risks, uncertainties and assumptions related to certain factors including, without limitations, competitive factors, general economic conditions, customer relations, relationships with vendors, the interest rate environment, governmental regulation and supervision, seasonality, distribution networks, product introductions and acceptance, technological change, changes in industry practices, onetime events and other factors described herein and in other filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, based upon changing conditions, should any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
NOTE 2 – MATERIAL ACQUISITIONS.
Generally speaking, the Securities and Exchange Commission sets forth guidelines which require a company to report as material certain acquisitions. The acquisitions discussed below do not necessarily meet this threshold; however, they are included in the interest of disclosure. The acquisitions were accounted for as a purchase. Unless otherwise noted, we funded the purchase price from existing cash balances. Our consolidated financial statements include the operating results from the date of acquisition. Unless otherwise noted, pro-forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of those operations were not material. In accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (FASB ASC 805), the total purchase consideration has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identifiable assets, based on their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
The Company acquires bingo halls through its appropriately formed and licensed wholly-owned corporate subsidiaries in the states in which it operates.
Littlefield Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 2 – MATERIAL ACQUISITIONS (continued).
2011
In January 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of a bingo hall in South Carolina for cash and note payable. The acquired bingo hall commenced operations January 6, 2011.
In June 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of a bingo hall in South Carolina for cash and a note payable. The acquired bingo hall commenced operations effective June 1, 2011.
In November 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of a bingo hall in South Carolina for cash and a note payable. The acquired bingo hall commenced operations effective November 14, 2011.
NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT.
Property and equipment at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
771,720 |
|
|
$ |
760,467 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
3,611,289 |
|
|
|
3,566,950 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6,214,600 |
|
|
|
6,048,706 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3,979,049 |
|
|
|
3,835,901 |
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
231,945 |
|
|
|
178,161 |
|
|
|
|
14,808,603 |
|
|
|
14,390,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,754,506 |
) |
|
|
(7,091,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
7,054,097 |
|
|
$ |
7,299,125 |
|
Total depreciation expense charged to operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $692,000 and $665,000 respectively.
NOTE 4 – GOODWILL & OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS.
Goodwill at September 30, 2012, was as follows:
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at December 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
6,970,931 |
|
|
$ |
(1,049,041 |
) |
|
$ |
5,921,890 |
|
Goodwill acquired during period
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Goodwill at September 30, 2012
|
|
$ |
6,970,931 |
|
|
$ |
(1,049,041 |
) |
|
$ |
5,921,890 |
|
Littlefield Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 4 – GOODWILL & OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (continued).
Intangible assets at September 30, 2012, consisted of the following:
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bingo licenses at December 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
881,339 |
|
|
|
(51,974 |
) |
|
$ |
829,365 |
|
Licenses acquired during the period
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Bingo licenses at September 30, 2012
|
|
$ |
881,339 |
|
|
|
(51,974 |
) |
|
$ |
829,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets with Finite Lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants not to compete at December 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
927,500 |
|
|
|
(364,514 |
) |
|
|
562,986 |
|
Change in covenants not to compete
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
(111,250 |
) |
|
|
(111,250 |
) |
Covenants not to compete at September 30, 2012
|
|
$ |
927,500 |
|
|
|
(475,764 |
) |
|
$ |
451,736 |
|
Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,281,101 |
|
Amortization expense charged to operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $111,000 and $91,000 respectively.
NOTE 5 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY.
At September 30, 2012, the Company held 1,417,679 treasury shares at an average purchase cost of $0.95.
NOTE 6 – SHARE BASED PAYMENTS.
The Company recorded approximately $79,000 and $91,000 in compensation expense in the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to options issued under its stock-based incentive compensation plans. This included expense related to both options issued in the current year and options issued in prior years for which the requisite service period for those options included the current year. The fair value of these options was calculated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model. There were 1,532,500 and 437,500 options issued during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For options issued in 2012 and 2011, the following assumptions were used: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 78%, risk free interest rate of 3.5% and the lesser of term of employment or an expected life of 10 years.
Littlefield Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 7 – EARNINGS PER SHARE.
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding (if dilutive) during each period. The number of common share equivalents, which include stock options, is computed using the treasury stock method.
A reconciliation of basic to diluted earnings (loss) per share is as follows:
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,336,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,336,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,357 |
) |
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,338,804 |
|
|
|
17,338,804 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and warrants
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,338,804 |
|
|
|
17,338,804 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
|
|
17,324,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
( 0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
( 0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
( 0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
( 0.01 |
) |
Stock options to acquire 3,133,910 and 1,118,940 shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect of including the stock options would have been anti-dilutive to a loss per share or the options were out of the money.
NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES.
Accrued expenses at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, consisted of the following:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Accrued contract termination costs
|
|
$ |
206,982 |
|
|
$ |
206,982 |
|
Accrued compensation costs
|
|
|
274,169 |
|
|
|
208,696 |
|
Accrued property taxes
|
|
|
143,113 |
|
|
|
201,689 |
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
443,423 |
|
|
|
429,537 |
|
Total Accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
1,067,687 |
|
|
$ |
1,046,904 |
|
NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS.
The carrying value of cash, net accounts receivable, accounts and notes payable contained in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value.
Littlefield Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 10 - ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK BASED COMPENSATION.
The Company applies FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (FASB ASC 718) and FASB ASC 505, Equity (FASB ASC 505), using the modified prospective method of implementation, whereby the prospective method records the compensation expense from the implementation date forward, however, it leaves prior periods unchanged in accounting for its stock options. At December 31, 2011, the Company has implemented five shareholder approved stock option plans. These plans are intended to comply with Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The plans collectively provide for the total issuance of 3,600,000 common shares over ten years from the date of each plan’s approval. In addition, the plans allow for additional increases of 15% of the then outstanding shares. Effective January 1, 2012, the plans were increased by an additional 3,000,000 common shares over ten years allowing for additional increases of 15% of the then outstanding shares by unanimous approval of the Board of Directors.
Transactions under the stock option plans are summarized below. At September 30, 2012, a total of 3,336,910 options were outstanding under these plans.
|
|
Employee Stock Plans
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding at 12/31/11
|
|
|
2,022,410 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,532,500 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(218,000 |
) |
|
|
0.59 |
|
Outstanding at 09/30/12
|
|
|
3,336,910 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
The fair value of options granted during the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, was approximately $73,383; with 32,500 options vested upon grant and 1,500,000 vesting during term of employment.
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price of $0.60 on the last trading day of the period in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 was $0, as no options were exercised. Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $96,809 as of September 30, 2012, related to approximately 212,500 shares with a per share weighted average fair value of $0.46. We anticipate this expense to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.5 years.
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at September 30, 2012, under the Employee Stock Plans and as if certain options had been accelerated:
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted Avg.
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
|
Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price
|
|
2012:
|
|
$ |
1.26 - 1.87 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
3.6 years
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 - $1.25 |
|
|
|
3,320,410 |
|
1.5 years
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
3,107,910 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
3,336,910 |
|
1.5 years
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
3,124,410 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
571,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
561,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of options exercisable as of September 30, 2012, was 0.2 years.
Littlefield Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.
In December 2011, the Company renewed and modified a five year employment agreement with its President and CEO for the period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. During the third quarter of 2012 the President and CEO was replaced and paid $300,000 in severance. In accordance with the agreement, the President and CEO, in January 2012, was awarded stock options for 1,500,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of 110% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The options were to vest ratably over the five year employment agreement period and were subject to acceleration upon certain conditions. The former President and CEO requested a non-broker-assisted cashless exercise for vested options and the Company has not determined an amount to directly convert those options, if any, determined to be in-the-money options. In accordance with the agreement, the Company accrued as Other liabilities – related party, $24,000 and $18,000 of deferred compensation in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company recorded approximately $28,000 and $43,000 of state income tax expense, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The Company does not expect to incur significant federal income tax charges until the utilization of its accumulated federal income tax loss carry-forwards, which totaled approximately $13,800,000 at December 31, 2011, and begin expiring in the year 2017.
FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (FASB ASC 740) addresses the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. If a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, then an enterprise would be required to recognize in its financial statements the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of September 30, 2012, the Company did not recognize a liability for uncertain tax positions. We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next twelve months. The tax years 2008 through 2011 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions in which we file income tax returns.
NOTE 13 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS.
In September 2011, the FASB updated FASB ASC 350, Goodwill and Other (FASB ASC 350) that gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment test performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted the update as required as of the period ended March 31, 2012 and concluded it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Littlefield Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 14 – LONG TERM DEBT.
During the first quarter of 2011 the Company was advanced $210,000 on a promissory note. The note is secured by certain real estate, subject to certain financial covenants and matures in April 2016. Interest is indexed at prime plus three-quarter percent and may fluctuate between a four and one-quarter percent and seven and three-quarter percent interest rate.
In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company purchased assets in exchange for notes payable of approximately $637,000. The notes bear interest up to three percent and mature through January 2017.
In April 2012, the Company consolidated and refinanced certain notes totaling $778,450 and scheduled to mature in August 2012. The new ten year note expires in April 2022 and carries interest at a 5.25% fixed rate with monthly principal and interest installments of approximately $8,382 and is secured by real estate.
Certain notes payable to a bank are subject to financial covenants as part of the loan agreement. The Company is currently negotiating a waiver of non-compliance as of September 30, 2012. The notes payable subject to these covenants are classified as current and long term debt and are secured by certain real estate and other assets of the Company including a $150,000 certificate of deposit, which is classified as a current asset while the Company is in negotiations with the bank.
NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT.
In November 2012, the Company entered into a $500,000 loan agreement with a related party; the loan matures November 2013 and is secured by certain real estate with interest only payments at a fixed rate of six-percent.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The third quarter 2012 and year-to-date discussion in this report focuses on the Company’s results of operations which is comprised of the Company’s Entertainment business’ charitable bingo operations in four states: Texas, South Carolina, Alabama and Florida.
Third quarter 2012 compared to 2011
Results of operations
During the third quarter of 2012, which is historically a weaker seasonal period, the Company achieved revenue of approximately $1,653,000, a decline of 26% from the prior year. We incurred a net loss of approximately $931,000 versus a net loss of approximately $215,000 last year. Excluding the notable items discussed more fully under Net income (loss), page 18, the adjusted net loss excluding noted items was approximately $439,000 versus adjusted net income of approximately $66,000 in the same prior year period.
The Company has made the decision to reduce spending including staff reductions of approximately $1,100,000 on an annual basis to offset the effects of the reduced revenue. These reductions have been effected by reorganizing the management structure in South Carolina, Alabama and the Company headquarters.
Revenues
The following table sets forth the Company’s revenues for the quarters ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
|
Q3 2012 |
|
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,653,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,223,000 |
|
|
$ |
(570,000 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
%) |
Entertainment
|
|
|
1,626,000 |
|
|
|
2,202,000 |
|
|
|
(576,000 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
%) |
Texas
|
|
|
959,000 |
|
|
|
1,145,000 |
|
|
|
(186,000 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
%) |
South Carolina
|
|
|
304,000 |
|
|
|
731,000 |
|
|
|
(427,000 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
%) |
Alabama / Florida
|
|
|
363,000 |
|
|
|
326,000 |
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Other
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
NM
|
|
During the third quarter of 2012, total revenues for the Company declined 26% from 2011’s level. The third quarter is typically a seasonally weaker quarter due to weakness during the summer months. The decline in Entertainment revenue largely resulted from two closed bingo halls in Texas whose leases expired in accordance with the terms of those leases at the end of last year and weakness in certain South Carolina regional markets. Other revenue reflects ancillary revenue not included in Entertainment.
The weakness in certain regional markets in South Carolina mainly reflects changed market conditions caused by a soft economy, increased competition, timing of certain expenses and certain marketing changes. The increased competition mainly stems from a new hall and the introduction of sweepstakes machines, which are gaming devices that offer the chance to win money and compete with charitable bingo. The legality of sweepstakes machines under gambling laws has yet to be determined in South Carolina and elsewhere. The Company is developing alternative plans to be implemented depending upon a determination of the legality of these new devices and is reevaluating its marketing changes.
The contribution of Entertainment revenues by state were as follows:
|
|
|
Q3 2012 |
|
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
|
Change
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
South Carolina
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
(14 |
%) |
Alabama / Florida
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Gross margin and Costs and Expenses
The table below summarizes the Company’s gross margin for the quarters ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Gross margin percent (gross margin as a percent of sales) decreased to (3.1%) from 27.5% in 2011.
|
|
|
Q3 2012 |
|
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
|
Change
|
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
$ |
( 51,000 |
) |
|
$ |
612,000 |
|
|
$ |
(663,000 |
) |
Entertainment
|
|
|
(78,000 |
) |
|
|
591,000 |
|
|
|
(669,000 |
) |
Other
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
Overall, total costs and expenses increased 6% from the comparable prior year quarter primarily as a result of increasing the number of managers at the Company and higher marketing related expenses. As a result of changed market conditions, during 2012, the Company has made the decision to reduce spending including staff reductions in the management structure in South Carolina, Alabama and the Company headquarters of approximately $1,100,000 on an annual basis to offset the effects of the reduced revenue; of this total, the annual impact of the reductions on gross margin and costs and expenses is anticipated to be approximately $470,000.
Direct salaries and other compensation increased by approximately $52,000 from the prior year reflecting the increase in number of managers referred to above.
Rent and utilities in the third quarter 2012 decreased $30,000, largely due to the closure of two Texas halls at the end of last year whose leases expired in accordance with the terms of those leases. In 2012 and 2011, we did not recognize lease costs on a straight-line basis as provided in FASB ASC 840, Leases (FASB ASC 840). Instead, lease costs were recognized based on payments made or accrued during each month. If the Company had recognized lease expense on a straight-line basis in 2012 and 2011, total lease costs would not have materially changed the Company’s financial results. In general, the Company enters into long term leases underlying its operations. At the same time, the Company generally enters into agreements which are renewed annually with its customers. This permits the Company to adjust its customer agreements in response to general price increases and limits the effect of lease escalation clauses. Generally, the Company’s leases require payments of rent and a pro-rata share of real estate maintenance, taxes and insurance.
Other direct operating costs in the third quarter 2012 increased approximately $63,000 or 15% from the prior year, mainly as a result higher marketing and travel expenses.
Depreciation and amortization expense totaled approximately $265,000 ($246,000 Cost of Services plus $19,000 G&A) in 2012 versus $255,000 in the prior year with the increase mainly attributable to hall renovations including leasehold improvements and other asset purchases.
We measure corporate overhead as general and administrative expenses, excluding related depreciation expense, the noted legal fees and stock-based compensation. Corporate overhead totaled approximately $422,000 in Q3 2012, compared to approximately $566,000 in 2011. The decrease mainly reflected reduced accrued incentives and staffing in light of the lower performance. We measure corporate overhead because it provides management and investors with a tool to assess performance consistently over different financial periods.
The following table reconciles general and administrative expenses under GAAP to our corporate overhead measure.
Corporate overhead
|
|
|
Q3 2012 |
|
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
General and administrative expenses
(GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
527,654 |
|
|
$ |
784,423 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(19,322 |
) |
|
|
(25,468 |
) |
Noted legal expenses
|
|
|
(67,349 |
) |
|
|
(171,866 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(18,832 |
) |
|
|
(20,743 |
) |
|
|
|
(105,503 |
) |
|
|
(218,077 |
) |
Corporate overhead (non-GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
422,151 |
|
|
$ |
566,346 |
|
Other income and expense was an expense of approximately $34,000 for 2012, compared to approximately $37,000 in 2011.
Our income tax expense for 2012 was approximately $8,000 compared to $5,000 in 2011, all of which is related to the expected annual effective tax rate for state income taxes. At December 31, 2011, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $13.8 million which begin expiring in the year 2017.
Net income (loss)
During the third quarter of 2012, the Company’s net loss was approximately $931,000 versus a net loss of approximately $215,000 in the prior year; ($0.05) loss per basic share and a loss of ($0.05) per fully diluted share in Q3 2012 and ($0.01) loss per basic share and a loss of ($0.01) per fully diluted share in Q3 2011. The weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding totaled 17,340,589 in 2012 compared to 17,324,439 in 2011. The increase in shares outstanding reflects shares issued for the Company’s employee stock purchase plans.
The Q3 2012 results include approximately $491,000 of notable items:
·
|
$310,000 of termination costs,
|
·
|
$67,000 of legal expense for South Carolina and Texas,
|
·
|
$95,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas and
|
·
|
$19,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation.
|
Legal fees are expected to be more manageable with the conclusion of the Furtney case and other litigation. The termination costs relate to costs upon termination of the former President and CEO.
The Q3 2011 results include approximately $280,000 of notable items:
·
|
$172,000 of legal expense for South Carolina, Texas and its Furtney litigation (which was concluded at trial in October 2011),
|
·
|
$83,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas and
|
·
|
$25,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation.
|
Adjusted for the noted items above, a net loss excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) during the third quarter of 2012 was approximately $439,000 versus net income excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) of approximately $66,000 last year. Our management uses net income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) to measure performance consistently over different financial periods. Management uses this non-GAAP measure because we believe that including the non-GAAP results assists management and investors in assessing the Company’s operational performance and, relative to the Company’s historical financial performance, to enable comparability between periods. Management considers such non-GAAP results to be an important supplemental measure of its performance, but the Company presents these non-GAAP results as a complement to results provided in accordance with GAAP. These results should not be regarded as a substitute for GAAP.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) under GAAP to our adjusted net income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) measure.
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
Q3 2012 |
|
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Net income (loss) (GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
(930,667 |
) |
|
$ |
(214,625 |
) |
Hall start-up activities
|
|
|
94,991 |
|
|
|
83,083 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
19,322 |
|
|
|
25,468 |
|
Noted legal expenses
|
|
|
67,349 |
|
|
|
171,866 |
|
Termination costs
|
|
|
309,565 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
491,227 |
|
|
|
280,417 |
|
Net income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
(439,440 |
) |
|
$ |
65,792 |
|
Nine months to date 2012 compared to 2011
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, revenue was approximately $6,400,000, a 12% decrease from last year’s level. The Company posted an approximate net loss of $1,337,000 versus a net loss of approximately $142,000 last year. Excluding the notable items discussed more fully under Net income (loss), page 21, the adjusted net loss excluding noted items was approximately $500,000 versus adjusted net income of approximately $663,000 in the prior year period.
Revenues
The following table sets forth the Company’s revenues from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$ |
6,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,272,000 |
|
|
$ |
( 872,000 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
%) |
Entertainment
|
|
|
6,320,000 |
|
|
|
7,206,000 |
|
|
|
(886,000 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
%) |
Texas
|
|
|
3,180,000 |
|
|
|
3,557,000 |
|
|
|
(377,000 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
South Carolina
|
|
|
1,952,000 |
|
|
|
2,519,000 |
|
|
|
(567,000 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
Alabama / Florida
|
|
|
1,188,000 |
|
|
|
1,130,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Other
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
66,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
NM
|
|
During the first nine months of 2012, the 11% decline in Entertainment revenue at halls in Texas largely resulted from two closed bingo halls whose leases expired in accordance with the terms of those leases at the end of last year. Weakness in certain South Carolina regional markets has accounted for an increasing percentage of the decline in revenue during 2012. Other revenue includes other ancillary services and miscellaneous revenue not reported as Entertainment revenue.
The weakness in certain regional markets in South Carolina mainly reflects changed market conditions caused by a soft economy, increased competition, timing of certain expenses and certain marketing changes. The increased competition mainly stems from a new hall and the introduction of sweepstakes machines, which are gaming devices that offer the chance to win money and compete with charitable bingo. The legality of sweepstakes machines under gambling laws has yet to be determined in South Carolina and elsewhere. The Company is developing alternative plans to be implemented depending upon a determination of the legality of these new devices and is reevaluating its marketing changes.
The contribution of Entertainment revenues by state were as follows:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
South Carolina
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Alabama / Florida
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Gross margin and Costs and Expenses
The table below summarizes the Company’s gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Gross margin percent (gross margin as a percent of sales) decreased to 17% from 32% in 2011.
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
$ |
1,116,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,353,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,237,000 |
) |
Entertainment
|
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
|
2,287,000 |
|
|
|
(1,251,000 |
) |
Other
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
66,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
Overall, total costs and expenses increased 7% from the comparable nine-month prior year period mainly as a result of increasing the number of managers at the Company and increased marketing expenses in certain regional submarkets.
Direct salaries and other compensation increased approximately $281,000 reflecting the increase in managers cited above. As a result of changed market conditions, during 2012, the Company made the decision to reduce spending including staff reductions in the management structure in South Carolina, Alabama and the Company headquarters of approximately $1,100,000 on an annual basis to offset the effects of the reduced revenue; of this total, the annual impact of the reductions on gross margin and costs and expenses is anticipated to be approximately $470,000.
Rent and utilities in 2012 declined approximately $73,000 or 3% from 2011, largely due to the closure of two Texas halls at the end of last year whose leases expired in accordance with the terms of those leases. In 2012 and 2011, we did not recognize lease costs on a straight-line basis as provided in FASB ASC 840, Leases (FASB ASC 840). Instead, lease costs were recognized based on payments made or accrued during each month. If the Company had recognized lease expense on a straight-line basis in 2012 and 2011, total lease costs would not have materially changed the Company’s financial results. In general, the Company enters into long term leases underlying its operations. At the same time, the Company generally enters into agreements which are renewed annually with its customers. This permits the Company to adjust its customer agreements in response to general price increases and limits the effect of lease escalation clauses. Generally, the Company’s leases require payments of rent and a pro-rata share of real estate maintenance, taxes and insurance.
Other direct operating costs in 2012 increased approximately $101,000 or 7% from the prior year, mainly resulting from higher costs of promotions and development expenses associated with new halls, travel and other marketing initiatives.
Depreciation and amortization expense totaled approximately $803,000 ($744,000 Cost of Services plus $59,000 G&A) in 2012 versus $756,000 in the prior year. The increase in depreciation mainly relates to capital spending incurred for bingo hall renovations, including leasehold improvements and other asset purchases.
We measure corporate overhead as general and administrative expenses, excluding related depreciation expense, the noted legal fees and stock-based compensation. Corporate overhead totaled approximately $1,618,000 in 2012, compared to approximately $1,808,000 in 2011, a decrease of approximately $190,000. The decrease mainly reflected reduced accrued incentives, staffing and investor relations expenses in light of the lower performance. We measure corporate overhead because it provides management and investors with a tool to assess performance consistently over different financial periods.
The following table reconciles general and administrative expenses under GAAP to our corporate overhead measure.
Corporate overhead
|
|
Q3 YTD 2012
|
|
|
Q3 YTD 2012
|
|
General and administrative expenses (GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
2,005,110 |
|
|
$ |
2,350,855 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(78,961 |
) |
|
|
(91,002 |
) |
Noted legal expenses
|
|
|
(249,346 |
) |
|
|
(390,791 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(58,540 |
) |
|
|
(60,650 |
) |
Corporate overhead (non-GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
1,618,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,808,412 |
|
During 2011, the Company resolved several litigation matters that had been pending. The conclusion of these litigation items some of which had been pending for a number of years, should allow management to devote more time and resources toward business management and should reduce legal expense towards the end of this year. Current year legal expense relates mainly to efforts by the Company to collect delinquent rent and to investigate and pursue other potential legal claims, the effect of which will be included in our financial results when collected or settled.
Other income and expense was an expense of approximately $110,000 for 2012, compared to approximately $102,000 in 2011.
Our income tax expense for 2012 was approximately $28,000 compared to $43,000 in 2011, all of which is related to the expected annual effective tax rate for state income taxes. At December 31, 2011, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $13.8 million which begin expiring in the year 2017.
Net income (loss)
During the first nine months of 2012, the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $1,337,000, a loss of ($0.08) per basic share and ($0.08) per fully diluted share. During the first nine months of 2011, the net loss was approximately $142,000, a loss of ($0.01) per basic share and ($0.01) per fully diluted share. The weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding totaled 17,338,804 in 2012 compared to 17,324,439 in 2011. The increase in shares outstanding reflects shares issued for the Company’s employee stock purchase plans.
The Q3 2012 YTD results include approximately $836,000 of notable items:
·
|
$310,00 of termination costs,
|
·
|
$249,000 of legal expense for South Carolina and Texas,
|
·
|
$194,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas,
|
·
|
$79,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation and $4,000 of other expenses.
|
The Company continues to reduce the negative impact of legal expenses with the resolution of the Furtney case and other legal matters and the Texas start-up operations. The termination costs relate to costs upon termination of the former President and CEO.
The Q3 2011 YTD results include approximately $805,000 of notable items:
·
|
$391,000 of legal expense for South Carolina, Florida, Texas and its Furtney litigation (which was concluded at trial in October 2011),
|
·
|
$321,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas,
|
·
|
$91,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation and $2,000 for other asset disposals.
|
Adjusted for the noted items above, the net loss excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) during the first nine months of 2012 was approximately $500,000 versus net income excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) of approximately $663,000 last year.
Our management uses net income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) to measure performance consistently over different financial periods. Management uses this non-GAAP measure because we believe that including the non-GAAP results assists management and investors in assessing the Company’s operational performance and, relative to the Company’s historical financial performance, to enable comparability between periods. Management considers such non-GAAP results to be an important supplemental measure of its performance, but the Company presents these non-GAAP results as a complement to results provided in accordance with GAAP. These results should not be regarded as a substitute for GAAP.
The following table reconciles nine months year to date net income (loss) under GAAP to our adjusted net income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis) measure.
Net income (loss)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net income (loss) (GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
(1,336,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,357 |
) |
Hall start-up activities
|
|
|
193,661 |
|
|
|
322,095 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
78,961 |
|
|
|
91,002 |
|
Noted legal expenses
|
|
|
249,346 |
|
|
|
390,791 |
|
Termination costs
|
|
|
309,565 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Asset disposals
|
|
|
4,549 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
Net income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis)
|
|
$ |
(500,483 |
) |
|
$ |
663,080 |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2012, totaled approximately $503,000 and represented 3% of total assets of approximately $16,020,000; $150,000 of the cash and cash equivalents are collateral on certain bank loans. Current assets totaled approximately $1,320,000. Current liabilities totaled $1,809,000. Working capital was approximately ($489,000) compared to approximately $684,000 at December 31, 2011. Certain notes payable to a bank are subject to financial covenants as part of the loan agreement. The Company is currently negotiating a waiver of non-compliance with its bank and plans to move the loan to a new bank should a waiver not be attained. Certain current stockholders may guarantee a new loan facility. The notes payable subject to these covenants are classified as current and long term debt and are secured by certain real estate and other assets of the Company including the $150,000 certificate of deposit. The appraised value of the secured real estate exceeds the loan values by approximately $760,000.
Cash used by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 totaled approximately $392,000 compared to cash provided of $694,000 during 2011. Cash flows from operating activities in 2012 were decreased by a net loss of approximately $1,337,000 and provided by non-cash depreciation expense of approximately $803,000, stock based compensation of approximately $79,000 and other net changes in asset and liability accounts of $63,000. As a result of changed market conditions, the Company made the decision to reduce spending including staff reductions in the management structure in South Carolina, Alabama and the Company headquarters of approximately $1,100,000 on an annual basis.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled approximately $373,000 during 2012 compared to approximately $1,227,000 used during 2011. In 2012, approximately $452,000 was used for bingo hall renovations; partially offset by note receivable payments of approximately $79,000. During 2011, approximately $1,306,000 was used for bingo hall renovations and acquisition and settlement activities; partially offset by note receivable payments of approximately $79,000.
Cash used in financing activities in 2012 totaled approximately $383,000, compared to net cash used in financing activities in 2011 of approximately $188,000. In 2012, approximately $383,000 of cash was used for the payment of notes payable. During the first nine months of 2011, approximately $398,000 of cash was used for the payment of notes payable; this was partially offset by $210,000 provided by proceeds from a note payable.
At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $16,020,000 in total assets with total liabilities of approximately $4,874,000 and approximately $11,146,000 of shareholders’ equity. Total assets include approximately $503,000 in cash, $403,000 of net accounts receivable, other current assets of $414,000, $7,054,000 of net property and equipment, $7,203,000 of intangible assets, $84,000 net long-term note related to the sale of its event rental business in 2009 and $359,000 of other assets. Total liabilities primarily consist of accounts payable of approximately $222,000, notes payable obligations of approximately $3,411,000 and accrued and related-party liabilities of $1,068,000 and $173,000 respectively.
Prospective Capital Needs.
In 2012, we plan to use our existing cash together with cash generated from operations to make leasehold improvements and renovations in our bingo operations and for debt service. We also plan to use advantageous combinations of asset sales, bank financing, seller financing, treasury stock, and cash on hand to acquire new bingo halls when favorable terms can be obtained.
During the first nine months of 2012, we incurred a net loss of approximately $1,337,000. In the third quarter, our cash balance decreased by approximately $1,148,000 to $503,000 with approximately $392,000 of cash used by operations, $373,000 used in investing activities and $383,000 used in financing activities. The Company has made the decision to reduce spending including staff reductions of approximately $1,100,000 on an annual basis to offset the effects of reduced revenue. These reductions have been effected by reorganizing the management structure in South Carolina, Alabama and the Company headquarters.
We believe that our existing cash together with cash generated from operations and ability to raise additional funds from certain asset sales or bridge loans from existing investors will provide sufficient capital to cover our working capital needs, capital expenditures and investment requirements for the next 12 months.
Over the next twelve months, we may need to seek external financing in order to continue to pursue acquisitions or other corporate activities. We may also choose to raise additional funds from certain asset sales or by selling equity or debt securities to the public or to selected investors. We could also choose to reduce certain expenditures. In addition, even though we may not need additional funds, we may still elect to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain credit facilities for other reasons. If we elect to raise additional funds, we may not be able to obtain such funds on a timely basis on acceptable terms, if at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of our existing stockholders would be reduced. In addition, the equity or debt securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock.
Although we believe that we will have sufficient capital to fund our operating activities for the next 12 months, our liquidity plans are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now planned. We anticipate that the amount of capital we will need in the future will depend on many factors, including:
· general economic conditions and specific conditions in the markets we address, including any volatility in the various geographic regions in which we do
business;
· capital improvements for new and existing facilities;
· acquisitions of other businesses or assets;
· required levels of other operating costs and our relationships with suppliers and customers;
· the overall levels of sales and gross margins and the levels accounts receivable that we maintain; and
· our business, capital expenditure and expansion plans.
Financial Risk Management
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We have no off-balance sheet debt.
Market Risk. In the normal course of business, we employ established procedures to manage our exposure to changes in the market value of our investments. There were no significant investments in marketable securities at September 30, 2012 or 2011. The Company holds its funds in cash and certificates of deposit generally insured by the FDIC with uninsured amounts setting off loans payable. Generally, the Company minimizes exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its long-term debt arrangements by entering into fixed rate notes payable or establishing interest rate collars within which a variable interest rate on long-term debt may fluctuate. As a result of these terms the market risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on long-term debt is not material.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on past experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are those that depending upon the circumstances may affect our financial statements materially and involve difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact the Company in the future, actual results may be materially different from the estimates.
Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets
We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable and at least annually. In accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist, using a fair-value-based approach. Goodwill is deductible for tax purposes in certain jurisdictions. We have defined a single operating segment in that the Company’s operations share similar economic characteristics, similar customers, among other characteristics.
Factors considered important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
· significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
· significant changes in the manner of our use or disposal of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; and
· significant negative industry or economic trends.
When it is determined that the carrying value of intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the measurement of any impairment is determined and the carrying value is reduced as appropriate. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our expenses for any period if we made different judgments or utilized different estimates or if actual results varied materially from our estimates used in the impairment review.
Accounting for income taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts which are more likely than not to be realized. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Variations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially impact our financial position or our results of operations. In estimating future tax consequences, expected future events are considered other than enactments of changes in tax laws or rates.
Estimating allowances and loss contingencies
We recognize probable losses based upon estimates for certain items including collectability of our accounts and legal matters, when such losses are considered probable of being incurred and are reasonably estimable. We periodically evaluate available information, both internal and external, relative to such allowances and contingencies and adjust as necessary in the circumstances. In determining whether a loss should be accrued we evaluate, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and our ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our loss if we made different judgments or utilized different estimates or if actual results varied materially from our estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 13 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Response to this item is included in Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Market Risk above.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) the information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Based upon their evaluation, our management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15 d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) are effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2012, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Littlefield Corporation have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of a control. A design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None. The Company concluded its major outstanding litigation during 2011.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Response to this item is included in Note 14 to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Liquidity above.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Company on August 1, 2011).
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed by the Company on November 15, 1999, for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).
|
10.1
|
|
2012 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on April 12, 2012).
|
10.2
|
|
2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on April 12, 2012).
|
10.3
|
|
2012 Employment Agreement between the Company and Jeffrey L. Minch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2012).
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2012).
|
31.1*
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document**
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**
|
*
|
|
Filed herewith. Those items listed above but not filed herewith are incorporated by reference.
|
**
|
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.
|
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Littlefield Corporation
November 13, 2012
By:
/s/ JAMES D. RECKS
James D. Recks
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ RICHARD S. CHILINSKI
Richard S. Chilinski
Chief Financial Officer