Edgar Filing: LITTLEFIELD CORP

littlefield10q093011.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011

Commission file number 0-24805

LITTLEFIELD CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

74-2723809

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2501 N. Lamar Blvd.

Austin, Texas 78705

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number:

(512) 476-5141

_________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

On November 7, 2011, 17,324,439 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

FORM 10-Q

For the quarter ended September 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1	Financial Statements	2

	a)	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010	2

	b)	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	3

	c)	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	5

	d)	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	7

	e)	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9

	Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations	18

	Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	23

	Item 4	Controls and Procedures	23

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1	Legal Proceedings	24

	Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24

	Item 6	Exhibits	24

		Signatures and certifications	25

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,194,241		$	2,915,115
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $22,200 and $22,200, respectively		353,413			524,755
Other current assets		310,631			218,046
Note receivable – current portion		75,000			75,000
Total Current Assets		2,933,285			3,732,916

Property and Equipment – at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization		7,500,499			7,259,822

Other Assets:
Goodwill		5,974,840			5,474,147
Intangible assets, net		1,378,601			939,990
Note receivable, net		189,576			268,463
Other non-current assets		317,817			290,163
Total Other Assets		7,860,834			6,972,763

TOTAL ASSETS	$	18,294,618		$	17,965,501

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Long term debt, current portion	$	648,775		$	563,105
Trade accounts payable		209,318			305,361
Accrued expenses		892,464			873,161
Total Current Liabilities		1,750,557			1,741,627

Long-term Liabilities:
Long term debt, net of current portion		3,255,734			2,891,445
Other liabilities, related party		117,606			110,352
Total Long-term Liabilities		3,373,340			3,001,797
Total Liabilities		5,123,897			4,743,424

Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, (authorized 40,000,000 shares, issued 18,817,406 shares and 18,817,406 shares, respectively, outstanding 17,324,439 shares and 17,324,439 shares, respectively)		18,818			18,818
Additional paid-in-capital		31,305,950			31,214,949
Treasury stock – 1,492,967 and 1,492,967 shares, at cost		(1,422,355	)		(1,422,355	)
Accumulated deficit		(16,731,692	)		(16,589,335	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		13,170,721			13,222,077

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	18,294,618		$	17,965,501

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
REVENUES:
Entertainment	$	2,201,979		$	2,182,672
Other		21,400			19,417
TOTAL REVENUES		2,223,379			2,202,089

DIRECT COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Direct salaries and other compensation		181,608			199,370
Rent and utilities		749,473			688,022
Other direct operating costs		432,049			515,242
Depreciation and amortization		234,626			202,005
License expense		14,089			12,288
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES		1,611,845			1,616,927

GROSS MARGIN		611,534			585,162

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
Salaries and other compensation		324,124			285,980
Legal and accounting fees		229,798			152,586
Depreciation and amortization		20,743			20,116
Share-based compensation expense		25,468			25,317
Other general and administrative		184,290			168,670
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		784,423			652,669


OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)		(172,889	)		(67,507	)

OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
Interest income		3,839			6,978
Interest expense		(40,715	)		(44,643	)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES		(36,876	)		(37,665	)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(209,765	)		(105,172	)

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		4,860			26,119

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(214,625	)		(131,291	)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		---			---

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(214,625	)	$	(131,291	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
Discontinued operations		0.00			0.00
Total	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
Discontinued operations		0.00			0.00
Total	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		17,324,439			17,874,540

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		17,324,439			17,874,540

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
REVENUES:
Entertainment	$	7,206,466		$	7,491,636
Other		65,732			57,887
TOTAL REVENUES		7,272,198			7,549,523

DIRECT COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Direct salaries and other compensation		564,538			628,175
Rent and utilities		2,230,973			2,056,781
Other direct operating costs		1,364,638			1,398,763
Depreciation and amortization		695,391			586,795
License expense		63,446			73,061
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES		4,918,986			4,743,575

GROSS MARGIN		2,353,212			2,805,948

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
Salaries and other compensation		1,013,158			974,295
Legal and accounting fees		545,398			560,311
Depreciation and amortization		60,650			58,091
Share-based compensation expense		91,002			77,348
Other general and administrative		640,647			517,241
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		2,350,855			2,187,286

ARBITRATION JUDGEMENT		---			(122,449	)

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)		2,357			496,213

OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
Interest income		12,812			23,892
Interest expense		(113,438	)		(136,910	)
Other		(1,549	)		(15,190	)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES		(102,175	)		(128,208	)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(99,818	)		368,005

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		42,539			80,160

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(142,357	)		287,845

INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		---			---

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(142,357	)	$	287,845

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02
Discontinued operations		0.00			0.00
Total	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02

Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02
Discontinued operations		0.00			0.00
Total	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		17,324,439			17,890,661

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		17,324,439			18,317,710

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(142,357	)	$	287,845
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		756,041			644,886
Stock-based compensation expense		91,002			77,348
(Gain) loss on disposals of equipment		1,549			25,347

Increase (decrease) in cash flows as a result of changes in asset and liability account balances:
Accounts receivable, net		171,341			(3,778	)
Other assets		(114,129	)		(92,605	)
Trade accounts payable		(96,043	)		(69,210	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		26,557			(173,301	)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		693,961			696,532

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		(895,751	)		(613,915	)
Purchase of goodwill and intangibles		(409,752	)		(164,218	)
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable, net		78,886			78,887
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(1,226,617	)		(699,246	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payments on notes payable, legal settlements and capital leases		(398,218	)		(384,548	)
Repurchase of common stock		---			(175,923	)
Proceeds from note payable		210,000			375,000
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(188,218	)		(185,471	)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(720,874	)		(188,185	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		2,915,115			3,734,712

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	2,194,241		$	3,546,527

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Cash payments:

Interest	$	113,438	$	136,910


Income taxes	$	68,098	$	72,223


Non-cash transactions:


Issuance of treasury stock under deferred compensation plan	$	---	$	15,827

Issuance of treasury stock under employee stock purchase plan	$	---	$	14,268

Purchase of property and equipment in exchange for note payable	$	637,057	$	126,900

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 1 – PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Littlefield Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). The financial statements contained herein are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Where appropriate, items within the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to maintain consistency and comparability for all periods presented.

The operating results for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. Except for historical information contained herein, certain matters set forth in this report are forward looking statements that are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, including the impact of government regulation and taxation, customer attendance and spending, competition, and general economic conditions, among others. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries that are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” and “intend” and words or phrases of similar import, as they relate to the Company or its subsidiaries or Company management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current risks, uncertainties and assumptions related to certain factors including, without limitations, competitive factors, general economic conditions, customer relations, relationships with vendors, the interest rate environment, governmental regulation and supervision, seasonality, distribution networks, product introductions and acceptance, technological change, changes in industry practices, onetime events and other factors described herein and in other filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, based upon changing conditions, should any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

NOTE 2 – MATERIAL ACQUISITIONS, REORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS.

Generally speaking, the Securities and Exchange Commission sets forth guidelines which require a company to report as material certain acquisitions. The acquisitions discussed below do not necessarily meet this threshold; however, they are included in the interest of disclosure. The acquisitions were accounted for as a purchase. Unless otherwise noted, we funded the purchase price from existing cash balances. Our consolidated financial statements include the operating results from the date of acquisition. Unless otherwise noted, pro-forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of those operations were not material. In accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (FASB ASC 805), the total purchase consideration has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identifiable assets, based on their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.

The Company acquires bingo halls through its appropriately formed and licensed wholly-owned corporate subsidiaries in the states in which it operates.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 2 – MATERIAL ACQUISITIONS, REORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS (continued)

2011

In June 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of a bingo hall in South Carolina for cash and a note payable. The acquired bingo hall commenced operations effective June 1, 2011.

In January 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of a bingo hall in South Carolina for cash and a note payable. The acquired bingo hall commenced operations January 6, 2011.

In January 2011, the Company reached a settlement of its case in Abilene, as described more fully in Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies.

2010

On January 25, 2010, the Company acquired a bingo hall in South Carolina for cash and a note payable.

On December 6, 2010, the Company converted to a bingo hall a property formerly occupied by its real estate tenant.

On December 20, 2010, the Company purchased a bingo hall in South Carolina.

NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Land	$	760,467		$	760,467
Buildings		3,563,222			3,557,423
Leasehold improvements		6,541,890			5,892,755
Equipment, furniture and fixtures		3,830,966			3,768,089
Automobiles		155,516			155,516
		14,852,061			14,134,250

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(7,351,562	)		(6,874,428	)

Property and equipment, net	$	7,500,499		$	7,259,822

Total depreciation expense, for owned and leased assets, charged to continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $665,000 and $614,000 respectively.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 4 – GOODWILL & OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill at September 30, 2011, was as follows:

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Total

Goodwill at December 31, 2010	$	6,669,963	$	(1,195,816	)	$	5,474,147
Goodwill acquired during period		500,693		---			500,693
Goodwill at September 30, 2011	$	7,170,656	$	(1,195,816	)	$	5,974,840

Intangible assets at September 30, 2011, consisted of the following:

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Total
Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives:
Bingo licenses at December 31, 2010	$	881,339		(51,974	)	$	829,365
Licenses acquired during the period		---		---			---
Bingo licenses at September 30, 2011	$	881,339		(51,974	)	$	829,365

Intangible Assets with Finite Lives:
Covenants not to compete at December 31, 2010	$	392,500		(281,875	)	$	110,625
Change in covenants not to compete		530,000		(91,389	)		438,611
Covenants not to compete at September 30, 2011	$	922,500		(373,264	)	$	549,236
Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization						$	1,378,601

Amortization expense charged to operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $91,000 and $31,000 respectively. The increase in goodwill and covenants not to compete during 2011 resulted from two South Carolina bingo hall acquisitions and settlement described more fully in Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies.

NOTE 5 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

At September 30, 2011, the Company held 1,492,967 treasury shares at an average purchase cost of $0.95.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 6 – SHARE BASED PAYMENTS

The Company recorded approximately $91,000 and $77,000 in compensation expense in the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to options issued under its stock-based incentive compensation plans. This included expense related to both options issued in the current year and options issued in prior years for which the requisite service period for those options included the current year. The fair value of these options was calculated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model. There were 437,500 and 37,500 options issued during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For options issued in 2011, the following assumptions were used: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 78%, risk free interest rate of 3.5% and an expected life of 10 years.

NOTE 7 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding (if dilutive) during each period. The number of common share equivalents, which include stock options, is computed using the treasury stock method.

A reconciliation of basic to diluted earnings (loss) per share is as follows:

Nine months ended September 30,	2011			2011			2010		2010
	Basic			Diluted			Basic		Diluted
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(142,357	)	$	(142,357	)	$	287,845	$	287,845
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		17,324,439			17,324,439			17,890,661		17,890,661
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and warrants		---			---			---		427,049
Weighted average shares outstanding		17,324,439			17,324,439			17,890,661		18,317,710

Earnings (loss) per share	$	( 0.01	)	$	( 0.01	)	$	0.02	$	0.02

Stock options to acquire 764,918 and 122,833 shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect of including the stock options would have been anti-dilutive to a loss per share or the options were out of the money.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 8 - ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (FASB ASC 718) and FASB ASC 505, Equity (FASB ASC 505), using the modified prospective method of implementation, whereby the prospective method records the compensation expense from the implementation date forward, however leaves prior periods unchanged in accounting for its stock options. At September 30, 2011, the Company has implemented five shareholder approved stock option plans. These plans are intended to comply with Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The plans collectively provide for the total issuance of 3,600,000 common shares over ten years from the date of each plan’s approval. In addition, the plans allow for additional increases of 15% of the then outstanding shares.

Transactions under the stock option plans are summarized below. At September 30, 2011, a total of 2,009,910 options were outstanding under these plans.

	Employee Stock Plans
	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at 12/31/10		1,572,410	$	0.43
Granted		437,500		0.56
Exercised		---		---
Forfeited		--		---
Outstanding at 09/30/11		2,009,910	$	0.46

The fair value of options granted during the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $200,900; with 37,500 options vesting upon grant and 400,000 options vesting over four years subject to certain performance criteria.

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2011 was $0, as no options were exercised. Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $210,283 as of September 30, 2011, related to approximately 500,000 shares with a per share weighted average fair value of $0.42. We anticipate this expense to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.0 years.

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at September 30, 2011 under the Employee Stock Plan:

			Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable
	Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Avg. Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Avg. Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Weighted Avg. Exercise Price
2011:	$	1.26 - 1.34		16,500	4.6 years	$	1.32		16,500	$	1.32
	$	0.00 - $1.25		1,993,410	7.1 years	$	0.45		1,493,410	$	0.43
	Total			2,009,910	7.0 years	$	0.46		1,509,910	$	0.44

	Aggregate intrinsic value		$	197,610				$	182,520

The weighted average remaining contractual life of options exercisable as of September 30, 2011 was 6.1 years.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES

The Company recorded approximately $43,000 and $80,000 of state income tax expense, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The Company does not expect to incur significant federal income tax charges until the utilization of its accumulated federal income tax loss carry-forwards, which totaled approximately $12,500,000 at December 31, 2010, and substantially begin expiring in the year 2018.

FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (FASB ASC 740) addresses the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. If a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, then an enterprise would be required to recognize in its financial statements the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of September 30, 2011, the Company did not recognize a liability for uncertain tax positions. We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next twelve months. The tax years 2006 through 2010 remain open to examination by the taxing jurisdictions in which we file income tax returns.

NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During 2009, the Company renewed the employment agreement with its President and CEO; in accordance with this agreement, the Company accrued $18,000 and $18,000 of deferred compensation in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Generally speaking, the Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines require a company to report any pending legal and/or regulatory proceedings that involve a claim for damages in excess of ten percent (10%) of its current assets. The litigation and proceedings discussed below do not necessarily meet this threshold, but are included in the interest of disclosure. The Company is also sometimes engaged in routine litigation incidental to its business. In general, the Company will vigorously defend itself against all claims to the fullest extent possible. The legal proceedings exclude certain insurance claims for which the Company believes are covered and defended by existing insurance policies and ordinary and incidental matters.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Littlefield Corporation f/k/a/ American Bingo and Gaming v. Philip Furtney, Case No.: 2001 CA 4000, Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in and for Manatee County, Florida.

This suit is no longer pending. Littlefield sought recovery from the estate of Philip Furtney [“Furtney”] for fraud and negligent misrepresentations. This litigation arose from the 1995 acquisition of three Florida bingo centers by a predecessor, American Bingo & Gaming Corporation, from two corporations controlled by Furtney – Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc., [“Pondella”] and 800438 Ontario.

Several months after the acquisition of the three centers, the Florida Office of Statewide Prosecution obtained an indictment for alleged racketeering against two American Bingo subsidiaries that operated two of the centers and the Florida Attorney General brought a civil proceeding for racketeering against the same two subsidiaries and American Bingo. The indictment and civil litigation were the result of an investigation that had been ongoing for over one year prior to American Bingo’s acquisition of the centers.

American Bingo alleged that Furtney was aware of the investigation and its serious nature, but did not disclose the investigation to American Bingo during the negotiations for the sale of the centers. American Bingo alleged that even though Furtney was aware of the investigation, the acquisition agreements specifically and falsely stated that there were not any ongoing governmental investigations. American Bingo won the dismissal of the civil action brought by the Attorney General, settled the criminal case brought by the Statewide Prosecutor, and sold its Florida centers as a condition of the settlement. American Bingo suffered significant damages as a result of Furtney’s misconduct and sought to recover from his estate.

The resolution of this long pending matter was substantially delayed when Furtney, a citizen of Canada and part time resident of Mexico, avoided service of the Complaint for a number of years. Littlefield was finally successful in serving Furtney when he was in the United States in 2005, to attend related litigation. However, Furtney passed away in September 2007, several months before the scheduled trial date. In the event a defendant dies following the commencement of litigation, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a plaintiff may substitute the Defendant’s estate as the Defendant and continue to pursue the claim to judgment. Furtney’s estate was substituted as the Defendant and Littlefield continued to pursue its claims for damages, including all sums paid in the acquisition of the three centers, all costs incurred by American Bingo in the litigation with the state of Florida, and the amount of judgments Littlefield was required to pay to Pondella and 800438 Ontario as a result of related litigation.

The case proceeded to trial on October 10, 2011. At the close of Littlefield’s evidence, the trial judge dismissed the case. Although a predecessor judge had denied previous efforts to dismiss Littlefield’s claims based on the doctrine of res judicata and collateral estoppel, the trial judge found that the claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata and collateral estoppel as a result of the verdict in the 2005 litigation with Pondella and 800438 Ontario; he also found that the evidence was insufficient to establish that Furtney fraudulently induced American Bingo to enter to purchase the bingo centers.

Littlefield has vigorously pursued its claims against Furtney and has the right to appeal this result. However, given the nature of the dismissal and based upon the advice of counsel, no appeal is planned.

Cause No.24, 182-B; West Texas Bingo, Inc. v. Janie Wall, in the 104th Judicial District Court of Taylor County, Texas.

This suit is no longer pending. In this case, Plaintiff was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Plaintiff filed suit against the Defendants alleging the Defendants interfered with the Plaintiff's bingo operations and/or business operations located in Abilene, Texas. The Defendants asserted counterclaims against the Plaintiff alleging that the Plaintiff's claims were harassing and constituted intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendant's claims were dismissed by the Court via summary judgment in June 2008.

Defendants subsequently alleged that the Company and its CEO were the alter-ego of the Plaintiff and asserted third-party claims against them. These claims were dismissed by the Court via summary judgment in July 2010.

A mediation was conducted in January 2010 and in April 2010, but the case did not settle. In January 2011, this matter was resolved pursuant to the terms and conditions of a confidential settlement agreement entered into by the parties within which for consideration the Defendants surrendered their licenses to play bingo for a specified period of time.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Cause No. 2009-CI-14245, B-Y Mission Plaza CC, Ltd. v. Coastal Bend Bingo, Inc. and Littlefield Corporation, in the 285th District Court of Bexar County, Texas.

This suit is no longer pending. B-Y Mission, Plaintiff, filed suit against the Company and one of its affiliates, alleging breach of a lease agreement between B-Y Mission, Landlord, and Coastal Bend, Lessee, and seeking to compel arbitration of the dispute. The Company is the Guarantor of the lease entered into by one of its affiliates, Coastal Bend. Coastal Bend attempted to terminate the lease under a clause of the lease that the Company believes permits termination of the lease under the circumstances and tendered the appropriate termination amount. The Company also asserted that B-Y Mission engaged in fraud by, among other things, making material misrepresentations in connection with the lease. The Landlord contended the termination was wrongful and sought recovery of all remaining rental payments.

As a result of an arbitration conducted on March 31 and April 1, 2010, the arbitrator determined that the Company’s affiliate did not have grounds to terminate the lease as alleged. However, the arbitrator also determined that Company’s affiliate was entitled to a reduction of the amount of common area maintenance, insurance and taxes charged by the Landlord for the remainder of the lease. The arbitrator awarded the Landlord an amount for past rent and for attorney fees, which has been fully paid by the Company. The Company recorded a $122,449 charge in its first quarter 2010 results to reflect this judgment. On April 29, 2010, the Court entered its final judgment adopting the decision and award of the arbitrator. The judgment expressly recites that all monetary awards therein have been fully satisfied by the Company and its affiliate. Pursuant to the private agreement between the parties, the award of the arbitrator and the judgment adopting the same are not subject to appeal by any party.

NOTE 12 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2010, the FASB updated FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (FASB ASC 820) that requires additional disclosures and clarifies existing disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The additional disclosures include 1) transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and 2) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The update provides amendments that clarify existing disclosures on 1) level of disaggregation and 2) disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the update on January 1, 2010, as required and concluded it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB updated FASB ASC 820 that resulted in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments are to be applied prospectively and are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this update and have not yet determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB updated FASB ASC 350, Goodwill and Other (FASB ASC 350) that gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment test performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this update and have not yet determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Littlefield Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 13 – SPECIAL CHARGES

As more fully discussed in Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies, during the first three months of 2010, we recorded a $122,000 charge related to an arbitration judgment.

NOTE 14 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

This report presents the results of operations of the Company’s Hospitality segment as discontinued operations. Except for the fourth quarter of 2010 in which the Company incurred additional sales tax expense of $15,251 related to the disposed assets, there were no other results from the discontinued operations during 2011 or 2010. On April 1, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its Premiere Tents and Events (“PTE”) business unit reflecting the Company’s focus on its charitable bingo business in Texas, South Carolina, Alabama and Florida.

NOTE 15 – LONG TERM DEBT

During the first quarter of 2011 the Company was advanced $210,000 on a promissory note. The note is secured by certain real estate, subject to certain financial covenants and matures in April 2016. Interest is indexed at prime plus three-quarter percent and may fluctuate between a four and one-quarter percent and seven and three-quarter percent interest rate.

In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company purchased acquisition assets in exchange for notes payable of approximately $637,000. The notes bear interest up to three percent and mature through January 2017.

NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The third quarter 2011 and year-to-date discussion in this report focuses on the Company’s results of continuing operations which is comprised of the Company’s Entertainment business’ charitable bingo operations in four states: Texas, South Carolina, Alabama and Florida.

Third quarter 2011 compared to 2010

Results of operations

During the third quarter of 2011, which is historically a weaker seasonal period, the Company achieved its highest level of third quarter bingo revenue at approximately $2,220,000. Revenue rose 1% over last year. We incurred a loss from continuing operations of approximately $215,000 versus a loss of approximately $131,000 last year. Excluding the notable items discussed more fully under Income (loss) from continuing operations below, adjusted income from continuing operations was approximately $66,000 versus adjusted income of approximately $144,000 in the same prior year period.

Revenues

The following table sets forth the Company’s revenues from continuing operations for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

		Q3 2011		Q3 2010	Change			% Change
Total Revenues	$	2,223,000	$	2,202,000	$	21,000			1	%
Entertainment		2,202,000		2,183,000		19,000			1	%
Texas		1,145,000		1,048,000		97,000			9	%
South Carolina		731,000		779,000		(48,000	)		(6	%)
Alabama / Florida		326,000		356,000		(30,000	)		(8	%)
Other	$	21,000	$	19,000	$	2,000		NM

During the third quarter of 2011, total revenues for the Company reached a record-setting level of third quarter bingo revenue. The third quarter is typically a weaker quarter due to seasonal weakness during the summer months. The revenue increase reflects the contribution of acquired halls in South Carolina and stronger performance in Texas which offset the effects of increased competition in two of our regional submarkets. Other revenue reflects ancillary revenue not included in Entertainment.

The contribution of Entertainment revenues by state were as follows:

	Q3 2011		Q3 2010		Change
Texas	52	%	48	%		4	%
South Carolina	33	%	36	%		(3	%)
Alabama / Florida	15	%	16	%		(1	%)

Gross profit and Costs and Expenses

The table below summarizes the Company’s gross profit from continuing operations for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Gross profit percent (gross profit as a percent of sales) increased to 27.5% from 26.6% in 2010.

		Q3 2011		Q3 2010	Change		% Change
Total Gross Profit	$	612,000	$	585,000	$	27,000		5	%
Entertainment		591,000		566,000		25,000		4	%
Other	$	21,000	$	19,000	$	2,000	NM

Overall, total costs and expenses were approximately even with the comparable prior year quarter.

Direct salaries and other compensation were down approximately $18,000 or 9% from the prior year mainly reflecting lower staff levels.

Table of Contents

Rent and utilities in the third quarter 2011 increased approximately $61,000 or 9% from 2010, largely due to the addition of new halls. In 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize lease costs on a straight-line basis as provided in FASB ASC 840, Leases (FASB ASC 840). Instead, lease costs were recognized based on payments made or accrued during each month. If the Company had recognized lease expense on a straight-line basis in 2011 and 2010, total lease costs would not have materially changed the Company’s financial results. In general, the Company enters into long term leases underlying its operations. At the same time, the Company generally enters into agreements which are renewed annually with its customers. This permits the Company to adjust its customer agreements in response to general price increases and limits the effect of lease escalation clauses. Generally, the Company’s leases require payments of rent and a pro-rata share of real estate maintenance, taxes and insurance.

Other direct operating costs in the third quarter 2011 declined approximately $83,000 or 16% from the prior year, mainly as a result of lower relocation expenses for certain new employees and controlled expenses.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled approximately $255,000 ($235,000 Cost of Services plus $20,000 G&A) in 2011 versus $222,000 in the prior year with the increase mainly attributable to hall renovations including leasehold improvements and asset acquisitions.

We measure corporate overhead as general and administrative expenses, excluding related depreciation expense, the noted legal fees and stock-based compensation. Corporate overhead totaled approximately $566,000 in Q3 2011, compared to approximately $491,000 in 2010. Corporate overhead approximated the same level as the prior year’s quarter except for costs to register certain shares and increased acquisition related expenses and occupancy costs. The Company was required to register certain shares issued in accordance with its 2008 private placement agreement; although these shares may not be sold until after December 31, 2012. We measure corporate overhead because it provides management with a tool to assess performance consistently over different financial periods.

The following table reconciles general and administrative expenses under GAAP to our corporate overhead measure.

Corporate overhead		Q3 2011			Q3 2010
General and administrative expenses (GAAP basis)	$	784,423		$	652,669
Stock-based compensation		(25,468	)		(25,317	)
Noted legal expenses		(171,866	)		(116,073	)
Depreciation and amortization		(20,743	)		(20,116	)
		(218,077	)		(161,506	)
Corporate overhead (non-GAAP basis)	$	566,346		$	491,163

Other income and expense was an expense of approximately $37,000 for 2011, compared to approximately $38,000 in 2010.

Our income tax expense for 2011 was approximately $5,000 compared to $26,000 in 2010, all of which is related to the expected annual effective tax rate for state income taxes. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a net operating loss available for carryover on its federal income taxes of approximately $12,500,000.

Income (loss) from continuing operations

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company’s loss from continuing operations was approximately $215,000 versus a loss of approximately $131,000 in the prior year; ($0.01) loss per basic share and a loss of ($0.01) per fully diluted share in Q3 2011 and ($0.01) loss per basic share and a loss of ($0.01) per fully diluted share in Q3 2010. The weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding totaled 17,324,439 in 2011 compared to 17,874,540 in 2010. The decrease in shares outstanding reflects shares repurchased under last year’s share repurchase program.

The Q3 2011 results include approximately $280,000 of notable items:

·	$172,000 of legal expense for South Carolina, Texas and its Furtney litigation (which was concluded at trial in October 2011),

·	$83,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas and

·	$25,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation.

Table of Contents

The Company continues to reduce the negative impact of the Texas start-up operations. Its legal fees are expected to be more manageable with the conclusion of the Furtney case and other litigation.

The Q3 2010 results include approximately $275,000 of notable items: $116,000 of legal expense for South Carolina, Florida, Texas and its Furtney litigation, $134,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas, and $25,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation.

Adjusted for the noted items above, the adjusted income from continuing operations during the third quarter of 2011 was approximately $66,000 and basic earnings per share were $0.00 per share in 2011 versus an adjusted income of approximately $144,000 and basic earnings per share of $0.01 last year. Our management uses adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations to measure performance consistently over different financial periods. The following table reconciles income (loss) from continuing operations under GAAP to our adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations measure.

Income (loss) from continuing operations		Q3 2011			Q3 2010
Income (loss) from continuing operations (GAAP basis)	$	(214,625	)	$	(131,291	)
Hall start-up activities		83,083			133,765
Stock-based compensation		25,468			25,317
Noted legal expenses		171,866			116,073
		280,417			275,155
Income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis)	$	65,792		$	143,864

Nine months to date 2011 compared to 2010

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, revenue from continuing operations was approximately $7,272,000, a 4% decrease from last year’s record level. The Company posted an approximate loss from continuing operations of $142,000 versus income from continuing operations of approximately $288,000 last year. Excluding the notable items discussed more fully under Income (loss) from continuing operations below, adjusted income from continuing operations was approximately $663,000 versus $1,289,000 in the prior year period.

Revenues

The following table sets forth the Company’s revenues from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	2011		2010		Change			% Change
Total Revenues	$	7,272,000	$	7,550,000	$	( 278,000	)		(4	%)
Entertainment		7,206,000		7,492,000		(286,000	)		(4	%)
Texas		3,557,000		3,555,000		2,000			0	%
South Carolina		2,519,000		2,829,000		(310,000	)		(11	%)
Alabama / Florida		1,130,000		1,108,000		22,000			2	%
Other	$	66,000	$	58,000	$	8,000		NM

During the first nine months of 2011, total revenues declined 4% from a record level of revenue in 2010. The 4% decrease in Entertainment revenue mainly reflects increased competition in two of our regional submarkets. Other revenue includes other ancillary services and miscellaneous revenue not reported as Entertainment revenue.

The contribution of Entertainment revenues by state were as follows:

	2011			2010			Change
Texas		49	%		47	%		2	%
South Carolina		35	%		38	%		(3	%)
Alabama / Florida		16	%		15	%		1	%

Table of Contents

Gross profit and Costs and Expenses

The table below summarizes the Company’s gross profit from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Gross profit percent (gross profit as a percent of sales) decreased to 32% from 37% in 2010.

	2011		2010		Change			% Change
Total Gross Profit	$	2,353,000	$	2,806,000	$	( 453,000	)		(16	%)
Entertainment		2,287,000		2,748,000	$	( 461,000	)		(17	%)
Other	$	66,000	$	58,000	$	8,000		NM

Overall, total cost of services increased 4% from the comparable nine-month prior year period mainly as a result of operating more halls and hall renovations.

Direct salaries and other compensation decreased approximately $64,000 or 10% from reduced staff levels.

Rent and utilities in 2011 increased approximately $174,000 or 8% from 2010, largely due operating more properties. In 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize lease costs on a straight-line basis as provided in FASB ASC 840, Leases (FASB ASC 840). Instead, lease costs were recognized based on payments made or accrued during each month. If the Company had recognized lease expense on a straight-line basis in 2011 and 2010, total lease costs would not have materially changed the Company’s financial results. In general, the Company enters into long term leases underlying its operations. At the same time, the Company generally enters into agreements which are renewed annually with its customers. This permits the Company to adjust its customer agreements in response to general price increases and limits the effect of lease escalation clauses. Generally, the Company’s leases require payments of rent and a pro-rata share of real estate maintenance, taxes and insurance.

Other direct operating costs in 2011 decreased approximately $34,000 or 2% from the prior year.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled approximately $756,000 ($695,000 Cost of Services plus $61,000 G&A) in 2011 versus $645,000 in the prior year. The increase in depreciation mainly relates to capital spending incurred for bingo hall renovations, including leasehold improvements and acquired assets.

We measure corporate overhead as general and administrative expenses, excluding related depreciation expense, the noted legal fees and stock-based compensation. Corporate overhead totaled approximately $1,808,000 in 2011, compared to approximately $1,616,000 in 2010, an increase of approximately $192,000. The increase is mainly related to additional acquisition related staffing, investor relations programs and costs to register certain shares. The Company was required to register certain shares issued in accordance with its 2008 private placement agreement; although these shares may not be sold until after December 31, 2012. We measure corporate overhead because it provides management with a tool to assess performance consistently over different financial periods. The following table reconciles general and administrative expenses under GAAP to our corporate overhead measure.

Corporate overhead	Q3 YTD 2011			Q3 YTD 2010
General and administrative expenses (GAAP basis)	$	2,350,855		$	2,187,286
Stock-based compensation		(91,002	)		(77,348	)
Noted legal expenses		(390,791	)		(435,805	)
Depreciation and amortization		(60,650	)		(58,091	)
Corporate overhead (non-GAAP basis)	$	1,808,412		$	1,616,042

Other income and expense was an expense of approximately $102,000 for 2011, compared to approximately $128,000 in 2010, reflecting lower interest expense from debt refinancings in 2010.

Our income tax expense for 2011 was approximately $43,000 compared to $80,000 in 2010, all of which is related to the expected annual effective tax rate for state income taxes. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a net operating loss available for carryover on its federal income taxes of approximately $12,500,000.

Table of Contents

Income (loss) from continuing operations

During the first nine months of 2011, the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations of approximately $142,000, a loss of ($0.01) per basic share and ($0.01) per fully diluted share. During the first nine months of 2010, income from continuing operations was approximately $288,000, $0.02 per basic share and $0.02 per fully diluted share. The weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding totaled 17,324,439 in 2011 compared to 17,890,661 in 2010. The decrease in shares outstanding resulted from last year’s share repurchase program.

The Q3 2011 YTD results include approximately $805,000 of notable items:

·	$391,000 of legal expense for South Carolina, Florida, Texas and its Furtney litigation,

·	$321,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas,

·	$2,000 other asset disposals and $91,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation.

The Company continues to reduce the negative impact of the Texas start-up operations. Its legal fees are expected be more manageable with the resolution of the Furtney case.

The Q3 2010 YTD results include approximately $1,001,000 of notable items: $436,000 of legal expense for South Carolina, Florida, Texas and its Furtney litigation, $351,000 of expense associated with the start-up of new halls and re-openings at halls in Texas, a $122,000 arbitration judgment, $15,000 other asset disposals and $77,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation.

Adjusted for the noted items above, the adjusted income from continuing operations during the first nine months of 2011 was approximately $663,000 and basic earnings per share were $0.04 per share in 2011 versus an adjusted income of approximately $1,289,000 and basic earnings per share of $0.07 last year. Our management uses adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations to measure performance consistently over different financial periods.

The following table reconciles income (loss) from continuing operations under GAAP to our adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations measure.

Income (loss) from continuing operations	2011			2010
Income (loss) from continuing operations (GAAP basis)	$	(142,357	)	$	287,845
Hall start-up activities		322,095			350,687
Stock-based compensation		91,002			77,348
Noted legal expenses		390,791			435,805
Arbitration judgment		---			122,449
Asset disposals		1,549			15,190
Income (loss) excluding noted items (non-GAAP basis)	$	663,080		$	1,289,324

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2011, totaled approximately $2,194,000 and represented 12% of total assets of approximately $18,295,000. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition or which are readily convertible to cash without penalty. Current assets totaled approximately $2,933,000. Current liabilities totaled $1,751,000. Working capital was approximately $1,182,000 with a current ratio of 1.7 to 1 compared to approximately 2.1 to 1 at December 31, 2010.

Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled approximately $694,000 compared to cash provided of $697,000 during 2010. Cash flows from operating activities in 2011 were decreased by a net loss of approximately $142,000 and provided by non-cash depreciation expense of approximately $756,000, stock based compensation of approximately $91,000 and partially offset by the net of the disposal of equipment and other net changes in asset and liability accounts of $11,000.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled approximately $1,227,000 during 2011 compared to approximately $699,000 during 2010. In 2011, approximately $1,306,000 was used for bingo hall renovations and acquisition and settlement activities; partially offset by note receivable payments of approximately $79,000 on notes receivable. During 2010, approximately $778,000 was used for capital expenditures mainly for bingo hall renovations, leasehold improvements and the acquisition of a hall in South Carolina, partially offset by the collection of approximately $79,000 of notes receivable.

Cash used in financing activities in 2011 totaled approximately $188,000, compared to net cash used in financing activities in 2010 of approximately $185,000. In 2011, approximately $398,000 of cash was used for the payment of notes payable; this was partially offset by $210,000 provided by proceeds from a note payable. In addition, the Company expects to refinance a $0.8 million loan payable due April 2012 during the fourth quarter of 2011. During the first nine months of 2010, approximately $384,000 of cash was used for the payment of notes payable and $176,000 to repurchase stock; these were partially offset by a $375,000 advance on a new term loan.

Table of Contents

At September 30, 2011, we had approximately $18,295,000 in total assets with total liabilities of approximately $5,124,000 and approximately $13,171,000 of shareholders’ equity. Total assets include approximately $2,194,000 in cash, $353,000 of net accounts receivable, other current assets of $386,000, $7,501,000 of net property and equipment, $7,353,000 of intangible assets, $190,000 long-term note related to the sale of PTE and $318,000 of other assets. Total liabilities primarily consist of accounts payable of approximately $209,000, notes payable obligations of approximately $3,905,000 and accrued and related-party liabilities of $892,000 and $118,000 respectively.

In 2011, we plan to continue to use our cash generated from operations to make leasehold improvements and renovations in our bingo operations. We also plan to use advantageous combinations of bank financing, seller financing, treasury stock, and cash on hand to acquire new bingo halls when favorable terms can be obtained.

Financial Risk Management

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We have no off-balance sheet debt.

Market Risk. In the normal course of business, we employ established procedures to manage our exposure to changes in the market value of our investments. There were no significant investments in marketable securities at September 30, 2011 or 2010. The Company holds its funds in cash and certificates of deposit generally insured by the FDIC with uninsured amounts setting off loans payable. Generally, the Company minimizes exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its long-term debt arrangements by entering into fixed rate notes payable or establishing interest rate collars within which a variable interest rate on long-term debt may fluctuate. As a result of these terms the market risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on long-term debt is not material.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 12 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Response to this item is included in Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Market Risk above.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls

The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) the information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based upon their evaluation, our management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15 d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) are effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Littlefield Corporation have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of a control. A design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of material pending legal proceedings, see Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies in the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit	Description
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on August 1, 2011).
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed by the Company on November 15, 1999, for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).
10.1*	2002 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2002).
10.2*	2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 22, 2002).
10.3*	2009 Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 31, 2009).
31.1	Rule 31a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications, filed herewith.
32.1	Section 1350 Certifications, filed herewith.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document**
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**
*	Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**	In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Littlefield Corporation

November 10, 2011

By:

/s/ JEFFREY L MINCH

Jeffrey L. Minch

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ RICHARD S. CHILINSKI

Richard S. Chilinski

Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents