UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-52423
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware |
|
61-1088522 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
555 South Flower Street, Suite 3700
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)
(213) 593-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of July 25, 2013, 100,804,056 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
AECOM Technology Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
351,651 |
|
$ |
456,983 |
|
|
Cash in consolidated joint ventures |
|
155,940 |
|
136,793 |
| ||
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
507,591 |
|
593,776 |
| ||
|
Accounts receivable—net |
|
2,341,146 |
|
2,395,881 |
| ||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
169,231 |
|
140,764 |
| ||
|
Deferred tax assets—net |
|
31,716 |
|
16,872 |
| ||
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
3,049,684 |
|
3,147,293 |
| ||
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—NET |
|
270,344 |
|
325,917 |
| ||
|
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS—NET |
|
118,135 |
|
126,948 |
| ||
|
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
|
83,843 |
|
91,049 |
| ||
|
GOODWILL |
|
1,797,314 |
|
1,775,352 |
| ||
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS—NET |
|
87,394 |
|
96,973 |
| ||
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
132,654 |
|
101,036 |
| ||
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
5,539,368 |
|
$ |
5,664,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
12,024 |
|
$ |
1,641 |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
711,220 |
|
761,211 |
| ||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
890,123 |
|
821,663 |
| ||
|
Income taxes payable |
|
5,776 |
|
12,641 |
| ||
|
Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts |
|
320,944 |
|
320,296 |
| ||
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
1,469 |
|
160,950 |
| ||
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
1,941,556 |
|
2,078,402 |
| ||
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
420,721 |
|
454,537 |
| ||
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
1,135,226 |
|
907,141 |
| ||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
3,497,503 |
|
3,440,080 |
| ||
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
AECOM STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Preferred stock, Class E—authorized, 20 shares; issued and outstanding, 2 and 3 shares as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively; no par value, $1.00 liquidation preference value |
|
— |
|
— |
| ||
|
Common stock—authorized, 300,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012; issued and outstanding, 97,617,749 and 107,041,003 as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively |
|
976 |
|
1,070 |
| ||
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,798,335 |
|
1,741,478 |
| ||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(270,830 |
) |
(179,173 |
) | ||
|
Retained earnings |
|
457,249 |
|
606,089 |
| ||
|
TOTAL AECOM STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
1,985,730 |
|
2,169,464 |
| ||
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
56,135 |
|
55,024 |
| ||
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
2,041,865 |
|
2,224,488 |
| ||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
$ |
5,539,368 |
|
$ |
5,664,568 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AECOM Technology Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited - in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,067,490 |
|
$ |
2,095,138 |
|
$ |
6,074,408 |
|
$ |
6,135,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Cost of revenue |
|
1,935,676 |
|
1,983,900 |
|
5,764,633 |
|
5,857,568 |
| ||||
|
Gross profit |
|
131,814 |
|
111,238 |
|
309,775 |
|
277,701 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Equity in earnings of joint ventures |
|
4,094 |
|
12,281 |
|
17,855 |
|
38,141 |
| ||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
(24,010 |
) |
(20,682 |
) |
(73,365 |
) |
(63,150 |
) | ||||
|
Income from operations |
|
111,898 |
|
102,837 |
|
254,265 |
|
252,692 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other income |
|
1,215 |
|
1,519 |
|
2,042 |
|
8,640 |
| ||||
|
Interest expense |
|
(11,719 |
) |
(13,178 |
) |
(34,495 |
) |
(35,727 |
) | ||||
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
101,394 |
|
91,178 |
|
221,812 |
|
225,605 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Income tax expense |
|
30,179 |
|
21,323 |
|
56,843 |
|
57,670 |
| ||||
|
Net income |
|
71,215 |
|
69,855 |
|
164,969 |
|
167,935 |
| ||||
|
Noncontrolling interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries, net of tax |
|
(460 |
) |
(442 |
) |
(2,294 |
) |
(1,597 |
) | ||||
|
Net income attributable to AECOM |
|
$ |
70,755 |
|
$ |
69,413 |
|
$ |
162,675 |
|
$ |
166,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Net income attributable to AECOM per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Basic |
|
99,257 |
|
110,221 |
|
101,482 |
|
112,513 |
| ||||
|
Diluted |
|
100,761 |
|
110,819 |
|
102,706 |
|
113,233 |
| ||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AECOM Technology Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited—in thousands)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
71,215 |
|
$ |
69,855 |
|
$ |
164,969 |
|
$ |
167,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(63,404 |
) |
(29,626 |
) |
(98,282 |
) |
19,335 |
| ||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
258 |
|
(1,741 |
) |
262 |
|
(3,463 |
) | ||||
|
Reclassification adjustments for losses included in net income |
|
478 |
|
387 |
|
1,372 |
|
935 |
| ||||
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives, net of tax |
|
736 |
|
(1,354 |
) |
1,634 |
|
(2,528 |
) | ||||
|
Pension adjustments, net of tax |
|
445 |
|
2,188 |
|
4,991 |
|
604 |
| ||||
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
8,992 |
|
41,063 |
|
73,312 |
|
185,346 |
| ||||
|
Noncontrolling interests in comprehensive income of consolidated subsidiaries, net of tax |
|
(460 |
) |
(442 |
) |
(2,294 |
) |
(1,597 |
) | ||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to AECOM, net of tax |
|
$ |
8,532 |
|
$ |
40,621 |
|
$ |
71,018 |
|
$ |
183,749 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AECOM Technology Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited - in thousands)
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
164,969 |
|
$ |
167,935 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
71,371 |
|
76,893 |
| ||
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
(17,855 |
) |
(38,141 |
) | ||
|
Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
21,273 |
|
21,914 |
| ||
|
Non-cash stock compensation |
|
27,404 |
|
19,690 |
| ||
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment |
|
(1,754 |
) |
(1,133 |
) | ||
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
(29,425 |
) |
570 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
1,988 |
|
(2,854 |
) | ||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Accounts receivable |
|
95,452 |
|
(107,997 |
) | ||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(18,259 |
) |
30,707 |
| ||
|
Accounts payable |
|
(61,786 |
) |
58,164 |
| ||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
41,247 |
|
(14,151 |
) | ||
|
Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts |
|
(11,280 |
) |
37,111 |
| ||
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(27,375 |
) |
(41,745 |
) | ||
|
Income taxes payable |
|
(7,519 |
) |
— |
| ||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
248,451 |
|
206,963 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Payments for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
(37,269 |
) |
(12,571 |
) | ||
|
Net investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
2,320 |
|
(2,453 |
) | ||
|
Purchase of investments |
|
(40,403 |
) |
(28,571 |
) | ||
|
Payments for capital expenditures |
|
(37,067 |
) |
(47,805 |
) | ||
|
Other |
|
2,724 |
|
2,525 |
| ||
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(109,695 |
) |
(88,875 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Proceeds from borrowings under credit agreements |
|
1,847,723 |
|
1,077,136 |
| ||
|
Repayments of borrowings under credit agreements |
|
(1,748,366 |
) |
(1,170,246 |
) | ||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
11,801 |
|
11,436 |
| ||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
10,509 |
|
3,902 |
| ||
|
Payments to repurchase common stock under the Repurchase Program |
|
(314,144 |
) |
(100,023 |
) | ||
|
Payments for other repurchases of common stock |
|
(8,000 |
) |
(7,137 |
) | ||
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment |
|
1,754 |
|
1,133 |
| ||
|
Net distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
(13,556 |
) |
(870 |
) | ||
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(212,279 |
) |
(184,669 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
(12,662 |
) |
8,035 |
| ||
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(86,185 |
) |
(58,546 |
) | ||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
593,776 |
|
456,940 |
| ||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
507,591 |
|
$ |
398,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Common stock issued in acquisitions |
|
$ |
14,322 |
|
$ |
857 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AECOM Technology Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AECOM Technology Corporation (AECOM or the Company) are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, including all normal recurring items necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. All inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S. for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Certain immaterial reclassifications were made to the prior year to conform to current year presentation.
The results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013.
The Company reports its annual results of operations based on 52 or 53-week periods ending on the Friday nearest September 30. The Company reports its quarterly results of operations based on periods ending on the Friday nearest December 31, March 31, and June 30. For clarity of presentation, all periods are presented as if the periods ended on September 30, December 31, March 31, and June 30.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The standard requires companies to present items of net income, items of other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income in one continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements. This guidance was effective for the Company in its fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance intended to simplify goodwill impairment testing. Entities are allowed to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. This guidance was effective for goodwill impairment tests performed in interim and annual periods for the Company in its fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012. This guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to update the presentation of reclassifications from comprehensive income to net income in consolidated financial statements. Under this new guidance, an entity is required to present information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income either by the respective line items of net income or by cross-reference to other required disclosures. The new guidance does not change the requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. This guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning October 1, 2013 and it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3. Stock Repurchase Program
In August 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program (Repurchase Program), pursuant to which the Company could initially purchase up to $200 million of its common stock. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors has increased the authorization to repurchase common stock by $800 million, increasing the total authorized repurchases under the Repurchase Program to $1.0 billion.
Share repurchases under the Repurchase Program can be made through open market purchases, unsolicited or solicited privately negotiated transactions or other methods, including pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. Under the Repurchase Program, which includes purchases made through an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement, Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans and the open market, the Company has purchased a total of 24.6 million shares at an average price of $23.35 per share, for a total cost of $573.7 million. As of June 30, 2013, $426.3 million was available for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Repurchase Program. Repurchased shares are returned to treasury status, but remain authorized for registration and issuance in the future.
Accelerated Share Repurchase
In connection with the Repurchase Program, the Company entered into an ASR agreement with Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America) on August 16, 2011. Under the ASR agreement, the Company agreed to repurchase $100 million of its common stock from Bank of America. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Bank of America delivered 4.3 million shares to the Company, at which point the Company’s shares outstanding were reduced and accounted for as a reduction to retained earnings. The number of shares delivered was the minimum amount of shares Bank of America was contractually obligated to provide under the ASR agreement.
The number of shares that ultimately were repurchased by the Company under the ASR agreement was based upon the volume-weighted average share price of the Company’s common stock during the term of the ASR agreement, less an agreed discount, subject to collar provisions which established a maximum and minimum price and other customary conditions under the ASR agreement. The ASR agreement was settled in full on March 7, 2012 and the total number of shares repurchased was 4.8 million at an average price of $20.97 per share.
Rule 10b5-1 Repurchase Plan and Open Market Purchases
In connection with the Repurchase Program, the Company enters into Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans. The timing, nature and amount of purchases depended on a variety of factors, including market conditions and the volume limit defined by Rule 10b-18.
From the inception of the Repurchase Program through June 30, 2013, the Company had repurchased through open market purchases and purchases made under Rule 10b5-1 plans, a total of 19.8 million shares at an average price of $23.93 per share, for a total cost of $473.7 million, which included 0.2 million shares repurchased in transactions that were settled in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
4. Business Acquisitions, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Consideration for business acquisitions during the nine months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $55.0 million in cash and $14.3 million in stock. Business acquisitions included South Africa-based BKS Group and Asia-based KPK Quantity Surveyors. These business acquisitions did not meet the quantitative thresholds, either individually or in the aggregate, to require pro forma disclosures of operating results based on the Company’s consolidated assets and income.
At the time of acquisition, the Company preliminarily estimates the amount of the identifiable intangible assets acquired based upon historical valuations of similar acquisitions and the facts and circumstances available at the time. The Company determines the final value of the identifiable intangible assets as soon as information is available, but not more than 12 months from the date of acquisition. Post-acquisition adjustments primarily relate to project related liabilities.
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Post- |
|
Foreign |
|
Acquired |
|
June 30, 2013 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Professional Technical Services |
|
$ |
1,608.6 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
(43.4 |
) |
$ |
65.3 |
|
$ |
1,630.5 |
|
|
Management Support Services |
|
166.8 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
166.8 |
| |||||
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,775.4 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
(43.4 |
) |
$ |
65.3 |
|
$ |
1,797.3 |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Post- |
|
Foreign |
|
Acquired |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Professional Technical Services |
|
$ |
1,733.9 |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
$ |
1,749.8 |
|
|
Management Support Services |
|
352.4 |
|
7.5 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
359.9 |
| |||||
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,086.3 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
$ |
2,109.7 |
|
The gross amounts and accumulated amortization of the Company’s acquired identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, included in intangible assets—net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, were as follows:
|
|
|
June 30, 2013 |
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Intangible |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Intangible |
|
Amortization |
| ||||||
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Assets, Net |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Assets, Net |
|
Period |
| ||||||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
(years) |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Backlog |
|
$ |
94.9 |
|
$ |
(88.1 |
) |
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
91.1 |
|
$ |
(83.8 |
) |
$ |
7.3 |
|
1—5 |
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
146.3 |
|
(65.7 |
) |
80.6 |
|
143.6 |
|
(54.1 |
) |
89.5 |
|
10 |
| ||||||
|
Trademark / tradename |
|
7.8 |
|
(7.8 |
) |
— |
|
7.8 |
|
(7.6 |
) |
0.2 |
|
2 |
| ||||||
|
Total |
|
$ |
249.0 |
|
$ |
(161.6 |
) |
$ |
87.4 |
|
$ |
242.5 |
|
$ |
(145.5 |
) |
$ |
97.0 |
|
|
|
Amortization expense of acquired intangible assets included within cost of revenue was $16.1 million and $17.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The following table presents estimated amortization expense of intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2013 and for the succeeding years:
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(in millions) |
| |
|
2013 (three months remaining) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
2014 |
|
18.6 |
| |
|
2015 |
|
15.7 |
| |
|
2016 |
|
13.0 |
| |
|
2017 |
|
11.7 |
| |
|
Thereafter |
|
23.4 |
| |
|
Total |
|
$ |
87.4 |
|
5. Accounts Receivable—Net
Net accounts receivable consisted of the following as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Billed |
|
$ |
1,217.6 |
|
$ |
1,207.0 |
|
|
Unbilled |
|
1,061.2 |
|
1,145.1 |
| ||
|
Contract retentions |
|
165.9 |
|
156.6 |
| ||
|
Total accounts receivable—gross |
|
2,444.7 |
|
2,508.7 |
| ||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
(103.6 |
) |
(112.8 |
) | ||
|
Total accounts receivable—net |
|
$ |
2,341.1 |
|
$ |
2,395.9 |
|
Billed accounts receivable represent amounts billed to clients that have yet to be collected. Unbilled accounts receivable represent revenue recognized but not yet billed pursuant to contract terms or accounts billed after the period end. Substantially all unbilled receivables as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 are expected to be billed and collected within twelve months. Contract retentions represent amounts invoiced to clients where payments have been withheld pending the completion of certain milestones, or other contractual conditions, or upon the completion of a project. These retention agreements vary from project to project and could be outstanding for several months or years.
Allowances for doubtful accounts have been determined through specific identification of amounts considered to be uncollectible and potential write-offs, plus a non-specific allowance for other amounts for which some potential loss has been determined to be probable based on current and past experience.
Other than the U.S. Government, no single client accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of June 30, 2013 or September 30, 2012.
The Company sold trade receivables to financial institutions, of which $106.4 million and $31.2 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The Company does not retain financial or legal interest in these receivables.
6. Joint Ventures and Variable Interest Entities
The Company’s joint ventures provide architecture, engineering, program management, construction management and operations and maintenance services. Joint ventures, the combination of two or more partners, are generally formed for a specific project. Management of the joint venture is typically controlled by a joint venture executive committee, comprised of representatives from the joint venture partners. The joint venture executive committee normally provides management oversight and controls decisions which could have significant impact on the joint venture.
Some of the Company’s joint ventures have no employees and minimal operating expenses. For these joint ventures, the Company’s employees perform work for the joint venture, which is then billed to a third-party customer by the joint venture. These joint ventures function as pass through entities to bill the third-party customer. For consolidated entities, the Company records the entire amount of the services performed and the costs associated with these services, including the services provided by the other joint venture partners, in the Company’s results of operations. For certain of these joint ventures where a fee is added by an unconsolidated joint venture to client billings, the Company’s portion of that fee is recorded in equity in earnings of joint ventures.
The Company also has joint ventures that have their own employees and operating expenses, and to which the Company generally makes a capital contribution. The Company accounts for these joint ventures either as consolidated entities or equity method investments based on the criteria further discussed below.
The Company follows guidance issued by the FASB on the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs) that requires companies to utilize a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The process for identifying the primary beneficiary of a VIE requires consideration of the factors that indicate a party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance, including powers granted to the joint venture’s program manager, powers contained in the joint venture governing board and, to a certain extent, a company’s economic interest in the joint venture. The Company analyzes its joint ventures and classifies them as either:
· a VIE that must be consolidated because the Company is the primary beneficiary or the joint venture is not a VIE and the Company holds the majority voting interest with no significant participative rights available to the other partners; or
· a VIE that does not require consolidation because the Company is not the primary beneficiary or the joint venture is not a VIE and the Company does not hold the majority voting interest.
If it is determined that the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance, the Company considers whether or not it has the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
The Company has not provided financial or other support during the periods presented to any of its VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide. Contractually required support provided to the Company’s joint ventures is further discussed in Note 15.
Summary of unaudited financial information of the consolidated joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
201.0 |
|
$ |
243.2 |
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
— |
|
— |
| ||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
201.0 |
|
$ |
243.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
— |
|
— |
| ||
|
Total liabilities |
|
41.6 |
|
43.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Total AECOM equity |
|
115.2 |
|
145.1 |
| ||
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
44.2 |
|
55.0 |
| ||
|
Total owners’ equity |
|
159.4 |
|
200.1 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities and owners’ equity |
|
$ |
201.0 |
|
$ |
243.2 |
|
Total revenue of the consolidated joint ventures was $392.6 million and $346.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The assets of the Company’s consolidated joint ventures are restricted for use only by the particular joint venture and are not available for the general operations of the Company.
Summary of unaudited financial information of the unconsolidated joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
565.0 |
|
$ |
598.8 |
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
40.3 |
|
15.2 |
| ||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
605.3 |
|
$ |
614.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
414.8 |
|
$ |
411.2 |
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
4.3 |
|
2.7 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities |
|
419.1 |
|
413.9 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Joint ventures’ equity |
|
186.2 |
|
200.1 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities and joint ventures’ equity |
|
$ |
605.3 |
|
$ |
614.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
AECOM’s investment in joint ventures |
|
$ |
83.8 |
|
$ |
91.0 |
|
Total revenue of the unconsolidated joint ventures was $1,504.6 million and $1,478.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Total operating income of the unconsolidated joint ventures was $49.5 million and $92.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Summary of AECOM’s equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
|
June 30, 2013 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Pass through joint ventures |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
Other joint ventures |
|
13.1 |
|
34.0 |
| ||
|
Total |
|
$ |
17.9 |
|
$ |
38.1 |
|
7. Pension Benefit Obligations
The following table details the components of net periodic cost for the Company’s pension plans for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine months Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
June 30, 2013 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
June 30, 2013 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Int’l |
|
U.S. |
|
Int’l |
|
U.S. |
|
Int’l |
|
U.S. |
|
Int’l |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Components of net periodic (benefit) cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
Service costs |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
1.7 |
|
5.9 |
|
1.9 |
|
6.4 |
|
5.0 |
|
18.0 |
|
5.8 |
|
19.2 |
| ||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(2.1 |
) |
(5.6 |
) |
(2.1 |
) |
(6.3 |
) |
(6.4 |
) |
(17.1 |
) |
(6.3 |
) |
(19.0 |
) | ||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(0.1 |
) |
— |
|
(0.1 |
) | ||||||||
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
1.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
|
0.6 |
|
3.2 |
|
2.9 |
|
2.3 |
|
1.7 |
| ||||||||
|
Settlement loss recognized |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2.6 |
|
— |
|
0.5 |
| ||||||||
|
Net periodic (benefit) cost |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
The total amounts of employer contributions paid for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 were $5.7 million for U.S. plans and $12.3 million for non-U.S. plans. The expected remaining scheduled annual employer contributions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 are $1.0 million for U.S. plans and $4.7 million for non-U.S. plans. Included in other long-term liabilities are net pension liabilities of $175.2 million and $192.2 million as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.
8. Debt
Debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Unsecured term credit agreement |
|
$ |
750.0 |
|
$ |
750.0 |
|
|
Unsecured senior notes |
|
259.3 |
|
256.8 |
| ||
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility |
|
108.0 |
|
24.0 |
| ||
|
Notes secured by real properties |
|
— |
|
24.2 |
| ||
|
Other debt |
|
31.4 |
|
14.7 |
| ||
|
Total debt |
|
1,148.7 |
|
1,069.7 |
| ||
|
Less: Current portion of debt and short-term borrowings |
|
(13.5 |
) |
(162.6 |
) | ||
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
1,135.2 |
|
$ |
907.1 |
|
The following table presents, in millions, scheduled maturities of the Company’s debt as of June 30, 2013:
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
| |
|
2013 (three months remaining) |
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
2014 |
|
54.6 |
| |
|
2015 |
|
38.4 |
| |
|
2016 |
|
146.2 |
| |
|
2017 |
|
37.7 |
| |
|
Thereafter |
|
859.3 |
| |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,148.7 |
|
Unsecured Term Credit Agreement
In June 2013, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Term Credit Agreement) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and a lender, and the other lenders party thereto. Pursuant to the Term Credit Agreement, the Company borrowed $750 million and may borrow up to an additional $100 million subject to certain conditions, including Company and lender approval. The Company used approximately $675 million of the proceeds from the loans to repay indebtedness under its prior term loan facility. The loans under the Term Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either the Base Rate (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) plus an applicable margin or the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for the Base Rate loans is a range of 0.125% to 1.250% and the applicable margin for Eurodollar Rate loans is a range of 1.125% to 2.250%, both based on the debt-to-earnings leverage ratio of the Company at the end of each fiscal quarter. For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the average interest rate of the Company’s term loan facility was 2.0% and 2.2%, respectively. Payments of the initial principal amount outstanding under the Term Credit Agreement are required on an annual basis beginning on June 30, 2014 with the final principal balance of $600 million due on June 7, 2018. The Company may, at its option, prepay the loans at any time, without penalty.
Unsecured Senior Notes
In July 2010, the Company issued $300 million of notes to private institutional investors. The notes consisted of $175.0 million of 5.43% Senior Notes, Series A, due July 2020 and $125.0 million of 1.00% Senior Discount Notes, Series B, due July 2022 for net proceeds of $249.8 million. The outstanding accreted balance of Series B Notes, which have an effective interest rate of 5.62%, was $84.3 million and $81.8 million at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s unsecured senior notes was approximately $266.2 million at June 30, 2013 and $277.8 million at September 30, 2012. The Company calculated the fair values based on model-derived valuations using market observable inputs, which are Level 2 inputs under the accounting guidance. The Company’s obligations under the notes are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company pursuant to one or more subsidiary guarantees.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
In July 2011, the Company entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Revolving Credit Agreement) with Bank of America, N.A., as an administrative agent and a lender and the other lenders party thereto, which provides for a borrowing capacity of $1.05 billion. In June 2013, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement to, among other things, conform certain provisions to the applicable provisions in the Term Credit Agreement. The Revolving Credit Agreement has an expiration date of July 20, 2016 and prior to this expiration date, principal amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement may be repaid and reborrowed at the option of the Company without prepayment or penalty, subject to certain conditions. The Company may request an increase in capacity of up to a total of $1.15 billion, subject to certain conditions. The loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement may be borrowed in dollars or in certain foreign currencies and bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either the Base Rate (as defined in the Revolving Credit Agreement) plus an applicable margin or the Eurocurrency Rate (as defined in the Revolving Credit Agreement) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for the Base Rate loans is a range of 0.00% to 1.50% and the applicable margin for the Eurocurrency Rate loans is a range of 1.00% to 2.50%, both based on the Company’s debt-to-earnings leverage ratio at the end of each fiscal quarter. In addition to these borrowing rates, there is a commitment fee which ranges from 0.150% to 0.375% on any unused commitment. At June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, $108.0 million and $24.0 million, respectively, were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $35.5 million and $35.1 million, respectively, under the revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $906.5 million available under its Revolving Credit Agreement.
Covenants and Restrictions
Under the Company’s debt agreements relating to its unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term credit agreements, the Company is subject to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio at the end of each fiscal quarter. This ratio is calculated by dividing consolidated funded debt (including financial letters of credit) by consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). For the Company’s debt agreements, EBITDA is defined as consolidated net income attributable to AECOM plus interest, depreciation and amortization expense, amounts set aside for taxes and other non-cash items (including a calculated annualized EBITDA from the Company’s acquisitions). As of June 30, 2013, the consolidated leverage ratio was 2.40, which did not exceed the Company’s most restrictive maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.0.
The Company’s Revolving Credit Agreement and Term Credit Agreement also contain certain covenants that limit the Company’s ability to, among other things, (i) merge with other entities, (ii) enter into a transaction resulting in a change of control, (iii) create new liens, (iv) sell assets outside of the ordinary course of business, (v) enter into transactions with affiliates, (vi) substantially change the general nature of the Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, and (vii) incur indebtedness and contingent obligations.
Additionally, the Company’s unsecured senior notes contain covenants that limit (i) certain types of indebtedness, which include indebtedness incurred by subsidiaries and indebtedness secured by a lien, (ii) merging with other entities, (iii) entering into a transaction resulting in a change of control, (iv) creating new liens, (v) selling assets outside of the ordinary course of business, (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates, and (vii) substantially changing the general nature of the Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole. The unsecured senior notes also contain a financial covenant that requires the Company to maintain a net worth above a calculated threshold. The threshold is calculated as $1.2 billion plus 40% of the consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter commencing with the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010. In the calculation of this threshold, the Company cannot include a consolidated net loss that may occur in any fiscal quarter. The Company’s net worth for this financial covenant is defined as total AECOM stockholders’ equity, which is consolidated stockholders’ equity, including any redeemable common stock and stock units and the liquidation preference of any preferred stock. As of June 30, 2013, this amount was $2.0 billion, which exceeds the calculated threshold of $1.6 billion.
Should the Company fail to comply with these covenants, all or a portion of its borrowings under the unsecured senior notes and unsecured term credit agreements could become immediately payable and its unsecured revolving credit facility could be terminated. At June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
The Company’s average effective interest rate on total borrowings, including the effects of the interest rate swap agreements, during the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 3.0% and 3.1%, respectively.
Notes Secured by Real Properties
Notes secured by real properties, payable to a bank, were assumed in connection with a business acquired during the year ended September 30, 2008. These notes payable accrued interest at 6.04% per annum and were to mature in December 2028. These notes were settled in connection with the sale of the real properties during the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Other Debt
Other debt consists primarily of bank overdrafts and obligations under capital leases and other unsecured credit facilities. In addition to the unsecured revolving credit facility discussed above, the Company also has other unsecured credit facilities primarily used for standby letters of credit issued for payment and performance guarantees. See Note 15 herein. At June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $234.6 million and $209.8 million, respectively. The Company had no obligations outstanding under these unsecured credit facilities as of June 30, 2013. Included in other debt as of September 30, 2012 were $4.8 million in outstanding obligations under these unsecured credit facilities. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $245.1 million available under its unsecured credit facilities.
9. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses certain interest rate derivative contracts to hedge interest rate exposures on the Company’s variable rate debt. The Company enters into foreign currency derivative contracts with financial institutions to reduce the risk that its cash flows and earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company’s hedging program is not designated for trading or speculative purposes.
The Company recognizes derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Company records changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of the derivatives that have been designated as accounting hedges in the accompanying consolidated statements of income as cost of revenue, interest expense, or to accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to fix the variable interest rates on portions of the Company’s debt. The Company also uses foreign currency options designated as cash flow hedges to hedge forecasted revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The Company initially reports any gain on the effective portion of a cash flow hedge as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Depending on the type of cash flow hedge, the gain is subsequently reclassified to either interest expense when the interest expense on the variable rate debt is recognized, or to cost of sales when the hedged revenues are recorded. If the hedged transaction becomes probable of not occurring, any gain or loss related to interest rate swap agreements or foreign currency options would be recognized in other income (expense). Further, the Company excludes the change in the time value of the foreign currency options from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The Company records the premium paid or time value of an option on the date of purchase as an asset. Thereafter, the Company recognizes any change to this time value in cost of sales.
At June 30, 2013, the effective portion of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges before tax effect was $3.5 million, of which $2.6 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense within the next 12 months. At June 30, 2013, the effective portion of the Company’s foreign currency options designated as cash flow hedges before tax effect, was $0.1 million.
As of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the notional principal, fixed rates and related expiration dates of the Company’s outstanding interest rate swap agreements were as follows:
|
Notional Amount |
|
Fixed |
|
Expiration |
| |
|
$ |
250.0 |
|
0.95 |
% |
September 2015 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
0.68 |
% |
December 2014 |
| |
|
150.0 |
|
0.55 |
% |
December 2013 |
| |
The notional principal of foreign currency options to purchase British Pounds (GBP) with Brazilian Reais (BRL) was BRL 2.4 million and BRL 16.4 million (or approximately $1.1 million and $8.1 million) at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. These foreign exchange contracts have maturities of 30 months or less.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts, which are not designated as accounting hedges, to hedge intercompany transactions and other monetary assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries. Gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in cost of sales for those instruments related to the provision of our services or general and administrative expenses, along with the offsetting losses and gains of the related hedged items. The notional principal of foreign currency forward contracts to purchase U.S. dollars with foreign currencies was $286.1 million and $60.1 million at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The notional principal of foreign currency forward contracts to sell U.S. dollars for foreign currencies was $287.7 million and $110.2 million at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The notional principal of foreign currency forward contracts to purchase GBP with BRL was BRL 12.0 million and BRL 9.7 million (or approximately $5.4 million and $4.9 million) at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The notional principal of foreign currency forward contracts to sell GBP for BRL was BRL 16.5 million (or approximately $7.4 million) at June 30, 2013. There were no foreign currency forward contracts to sell GBP for BRL outstanding at September 30, 2012.
Other Derivatives
Other derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments consist of option contracts that the Company uses to hedge anticipated transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company recognizes gains and losses on these contracts as well as the offsetting losses and gains of the related hedged item in other income (expense). The Company records the premium paid or time value of an option on the date of purchase as an asset. Thereafter, the Company recognizes any change to this time value in other income (expense). The notional principal of option contracts to sell U.S. dollars for foreign currencies was $17.3 million at September 30, 2012 and no such option contracts were outstanding at June 30, 2013. The notional principal of option contracts to purchase U.S. dollars with foreign currencies was $43.3 million at June 30, 2013 and no such option contracts were outstanding at September 30, 2012.
The fair values of our outstanding derivative instruments were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative |
| ||||
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Jun 30, |
|
Sep 30, |
| ||
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Foreign currency options |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Option contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
| ||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
5.0 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
0.9 |
|
3.2 |
| ||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
5.2 |
|
0.6 |
| ||
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on income and other comprehensive income is summarized below (in millions):
|
|
|
Decrease / (Increase) in Losses |
|
Decrease / (Increase) in Losses |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationship: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses Reclassified from |
|
Losses Reclassified from |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
Location |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationship: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains / (Losses) Recognized in |
|
Gains / (Losses) Recognized in |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
Location |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationship: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Foreign currency options |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
(1) Losses related to the ineffective portion of the hedges were not material in all periods presented.
The gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss from the Company’s foreign currency options was immaterial for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and the Company had no foreign currency options outstanding for the nine months ended June 30, 2012. There were no losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income from the foreign currency options in any of the periods presented. Additionally, there were no losses recognized in income due to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing from the Company’s interest rate swap agreements.
The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on income is summarized below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Gains / (Losses) Recognized |
|
Gains / (Losses) Recognized |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
Location |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
Option contracts |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
(0.3 |
) |
— |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
$ |
2.8 |
|
(1) Losses related to the ineffective portion of the hedges were not material in all periods presented.
10. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact, and the Company considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. It measures certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis.
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities include items such as goodwill and long lived assets that are measured at fair value resulting from impairment, if deemed necessary. During the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not record any fair value adjustments to those financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
· Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
· Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
· Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of assets or liabilities.
The following table summarizes the Company’s non-pension financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) in millions:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Quoted Prices in |
| ||
|
Foreign currency options |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
Option contracts |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
5.0 |
|
5.0 |
| ||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
5.2 |
|
5.2 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Quoted Prices in |
| ||
|
Foreign currency options |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
Option contracts |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
| ||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
For additional information about the Company’s derivatives, refer to Note 9 herein.
11. Share-based Payments
The fair value of the Company’s employee stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The expected term of awards granted represents the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury bond rates with maturities equal to the expected term of the option on the grant date. The Company uses historical data as a basis to estimate the probability of forfeitures. The Company did not grant any employee stock options during the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Stock option activity for the nine months ended June 30 was as follows:
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
Shares of stock |
|
Weighted average |
|
Shares of stock |
|
Weighted average |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
| ||
|
Outstanding at September 30 |
|
2.5 |
|
$ |
22.81 |
|
2.9 |
|
$ |
21.38 |
|
|
Options granted |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
| ||
|
Options exercised |
|
(0.6 |
) |
17.55 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
11.20 |
| ||
|
Options forfeited or expired |
|
(0.2 |
) |
26.95 |
|
— |
|
26.52 |
| ||
|
Outstanding at June 30 |
|
1.7 |
|
24.32 |
|
2.6 |
|
22.63 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Vested and expected to vest in the future as of June 30 |
|
1.7 |
|
$ |
24.32 |
|
2.5 |
|
$ |
22.59 |
|
The Company grants stock units to employees under its Performance Earnings Program (PEP), whereby units are earned and issued dependent upon meeting established cumulative performance objectives over a two or three-year period. Additionally, the Company issues restricted stock units to employees which are earned based on service conditions. Total compensation expense related to share-based payments was $27.4 million and $19.7 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense related to total share-based payments outstanding was $66.8 million and $39.0 million as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively, to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the awards’ respective vesting periods which are generally three years.
Cash flows attributable to tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized for those stock options (excess tax benefits) is classified as financing cash flows. Excess tax benefits of $1.8 million and $1.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, have been classified as financing cash inflows in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
12. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate was 25.6% for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company’s effective tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to the tax rate differential on foreign earnings where the statutory rates are generally lower than the federal statutory rate. Our effective tax rate fluctuates from quarter to quarter due to several factors including the change in the mix of foreign and domestic earnings, tax law changes, outcomes of administrative audits, changes in our assessment of valuation allowances and other tax contingencies.
During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company entered into a restructuring transaction to make $147.9 million of cash previously outside of the U.S. available in the U.S. for general corporate purposes, which resulted in $4.9 million of U.S. income tax expense.
13. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available for common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potential common stock equivalent shares for the period. The Company includes as potential common shares the weighted average dilutive effects of outstanding stock options and restricted stock units using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share |
|
99.3 |
|
110.2 |
|
101.5 |
|
112.5 |
|
|
Potential common shares |
|
1.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
100.8 |
|
110.8 |
|
102.7 |
|
113.2 |
|
EPS includes the effect of repurchased shares, which are discussed in Note 3 herein. For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, options excluded from the calculation of potential common shares were not significant.
14. Other Financial Information
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Accrued salaries and benefits |
|
$ |
402.3 |
|
$ |
415.2 |
|
|
Accrued contract costs |
|
399.2 |
|
333.4 |
| ||
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
88.6 |
|
73.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
890.1 |
|
$ |
821.7 |
|
Accrued contract costs above include balances related to professional liability accruals of $118.4 million and $117.8 million as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The remaining accrued contract costs primarily relate to costs for services provided by subcontractors and other non-employees.
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Pension liabilities (Note 7) |
|
$ |
175.2 |
|
$ |
192.2 |
|
|
Reserve for uncertain tax positions |
|
56.0 |
|
56.3 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
189.5 |
|
206.0 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
420.7 |
|
$ |
454.5 |
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
|
Loss on cash flow hedge valuations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
(95.5 |
) |
2.7 |
| ||
|
Defined benefit minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax |
|
(173.2 |
) |
(178.2 |
) | ||
|
|
|
$ |
(270.8 |
) |
$ |
(179.2 |
) |
15. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company records amounts representing its probable estimated liabilities relating to claims, guarantees, litigation, audits and investigations. The Company relies in part on qualified actuaries to assist it in determining the level of reserves to establish for insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against it, and for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to the Company’s claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. The Company includes any adjustments to such insurance reserves in its consolidated results of operations.
The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheet or statements of income or cash flows.
In some instances, the Company guarantees that a project, when complete, will achieve specified performance standards. If the project subsequently fails to meet guaranteed performance standards, the Company may either incur additional costs or be held responsible for the costs incurred by the client to achieve the required performance standards. At June 30, 2013, the Company was contingently liable in the amount of approximately $270.1 million under standby letters of credit issued primarily in connection with general and professional liability insurance programs and for payment and performance guarantees.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into various agreements providing financial or performance assurances to clients on behalf of certain unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and other jointly executed contracts. These agreements are entered into primarily to support the project execution commitments of these entities. The guarantees have various expiration dates. For the majority of these projects, the maximum potential payment amount of an outstanding performance guarantee is the remaining cost of work to be performed by or on behalf of third parties. On projects where the Company has additional exposure including for delay or consequential damages, the policy is to cap such damages in order to limit this exposure and, in any case, to cap the performance guarantees themselves. Generally, under joint venture arrangements, if a partner is financially unable to complete its share of the contract, the other partner(s) will be required to complete those activities. The Company generally only enters into joint venture arrangements with partners who are reputable, financially sound and who carry appropriate levels of surety bonds for the project in order to adequately assure completion of their assignments. The Company does not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheet or statements of income or cash flows.
Global Linguists Solutions Joint Venture
On October 5, 2011 and February 8, 2012, the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) issued DCAA Forms 1 questioning costs incurred by Global Linguists Solutions (GLS), an equity method joint venture, of which McNeil Technologies, Inc., acquired by the Company in August 2010, is an owner. The questioned costs were incurred by GLS during fiscal 2009, a period prior to the acquisition. Specifically, the DCAA questioned direct labor, associated burdens, and fees billed to the U.S. Government under a contract for the U.S. Army for linguists that allegedly did not meet specific contract requirements. As a result of the issuance of the DCAA Forms 1, the U.S. Government has withheld approximately $19 million from payments on current year billings pending final resolution.
GLS is performing a review of the issues raised in the Forms 1 in order to respond fully to the questioned costs. Based on a preliminary review, GLS believes that it met the applicable contract requirements in all material respects.
Additionally, on April 20, 2012, GLS received a subpoena from the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Defense requesting documentation related to the same contract with the United States Army. GLS has responded to the government’s request and is cooperating in the government’s investigation. If the DCAA Forms 1 are not overruled and subsequent appeals are unsuccessful or there are unfavorable consequences from the Inspector General’s investigation, these events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
AECOM Australia
In 2005 and 2006, the Company’s main Australian subsidiary, AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM Australia), performed a traffic forecast assignment for a client consortium as part of their project to design, build, finance and operate a tolled motorway tunnel in Australia. To fund the motorway’s design and construction, the client formed a special purpose vehicle (SPV) that raised approximately $700 million Australian dollars through an initial public offering (IPO) of equity units in 2006 and approximately an additional $1.4 billion Australian dollars in long term bank loans. The SPV (and certain affiliated SPVs) went into insolvency administrations in February 2011.
A class action lawsuit, which has been amended to include approximately 770 of the IPO investors, was filed against AECOM Australia in the Federal Court of Australia on May 31, 2012. Separately, KordaMentha, the receivers for the SPVs, filed a lawsuit in the Federal Court of Australia on May 14, 2012. WestLB, one of the lending banks to the SPVs, filed a lawsuit in the Federal Court of Australia on May 18, 2012. Centerbridge Credit Partners (and a number of related entities) and Midtown Acquisitions (and a number of related entities), both claiming to be assignees of certain other lending banks, previously filed their own proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia and then subsequently withdrew the lawsuits. All of the lawsuits claim damages that purportedly resulted from AECOM Australia’s role in connection with the above described traffic forecast. None of the lawsuits specify the amount of damages sought and the damages sought by WestLB are duplicative of damages already included in the receivers’ claim.
AECOM Australia intends to vigorously defend the claims brought against it.
Hawaii Project
The U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) informed the Company in May 2011 that the USAO and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are investigating potential criminal charges in connection with services the Company’s subsidiary provided to the operator of the Waimanalo Gulch Sanitary Landfill in Hawaii. The Company has cooperated fully with the investigation and, as of this date, no actions have been filed. The Company believes that the investigation will show that there has been no criminal wrongdoing on the Company’s part or any of its subsidiaries and, if any actions are brought, the Company intends to vigorously defend against such actions.
The services performed by the subsidiary included the preparation of a pollution control plan, which the operator used to obtain permits necessary for the operation of the landfill. The USAO is investigating whether flooding at the landfill that resulted in the discharge of waste materials and storm water into the Pacific Ocean in December 2010 and January 2011 was due in part to reliance on information contained in the plan prepared by a subsidiary of the Company.
16. Reportable Segments
The Company’s operations are organized into two reportable segments: Professional Technical Services (PTS) and Management Support Services (MSS). The Company’s PTS reportable segment delivers planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design, and program and construction management services to commercial and government clients worldwide. The Company’s MSS reportable segment provides program and facilities management and maintenance, training, logistics, consulting, and technical assistance and systems integration services, primarily for agencies of the U.S. Government. These reportable segments are organized by the types of services provided, the differing specialized needs of the respective clients, and how the Company manages its business. The Company has aggregated various operating segments into its PTS reportable segment based on their similar characteristics, including similar long-term financial performance, the nature of services provided, internal processes for delivering those services, and types of customers.
Management internally analyzes the results of its operations using several non-GAAP measures. A significant portion of the Company’s revenues relates to services provided by subcontractors and other non-employees that it categorizes as other direct costs. Other direct costs are segregated from cost of revenues resulting in revenue, net of other direct costs, which is a measure of work performed by Company employees. The Company has included information on revenue, net of other direct costs, as it believes that it is useful to view its revenue exclusive of costs associated with external service providers.
The following tables set forth summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments:
|
Reportable Segments: |
|
Professional |
|
Management |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,847.1 |
|
$ |
220.4 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2,067.5 |
|
|
Revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
1,102.0 |
|
134.0 |
|
— |
|
1,236.0 |
| ||||
|
Gross profit |
|
119.8 |
|
12.0 |
|
— |
|
131.8 |
| ||||
|
Equity in earnings of joint ventures |
|
1.0 |
|
3.1 |
|
— |
|
4.1 |
| ||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
¾ |
|
¾ |
|
(24.0 |
) |
(24.0 |
) | ||||
|
Operating income |
|
120.8 |
|
15.1 |
|
(24.0 |
) |
111.9 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
|
6.5 |
% |
5.4 |
% |
— |
|
6.4 |
% | ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
10.9 |
% |
9.0 |
% |
— |
|
10.7 |
% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,846.5 |
|
$ |
248.7 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2,095.2 |
|
|
Revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
1,164.6 |
|
158.9 |
|
— |
|
1,323.5 |
| ||||
|
Gross profit |
|
114.2 |
|
(3.0 |
) |
— |
|
111.2 |
| ||||
|
Equity in earnings of joint ventures |
|
5.5 |
|
6.8 |
|
— |
|
12.3 |
| ||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
¾ |
|
¾ |
|
(20.7 |
) |
(20.7 |
) | ||||
|
Operating income |
|
119.7 |
|
3.8 |
|
(20.7 |
) |
102.8 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
|
6.2 |
% |
(1.2 |
)% |
— |
|
5.3 |
% | ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
9.8 |
% |
(1.9 |
)% |
— |
|
8.4 |
% | ||||
|
Reportable Segments: |
|
Professional |
|
Management |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||||||
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2013: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
5,384.2 |
|
$ |
690.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
6,074.4 |
|
|
Revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
3,306.1 |
|
426.8 |
|
— |
|
3,732.9 |
| ||||
|
Gross profit |
|
281.3 |
|
28.5 |
|
— |
|
309.8 |
| ||||
|
Equity in earnings of joint ventures |
|
10.3 |
|
7.6 |
|
— |
|
17.9 |
| ||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
¾ |
|
¾ |
|
(73.4 |
) |
(73.4 |
) | ||||
|
Operating income |
|
291.6 |
|
36.1 |
|
(73.4 |
) |
254.3 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
|
5.2 |
% |
4.1 |
% |
— |
|
5.1 |
% | ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
8.5 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
— |
|
8.3 |
% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
5,455.0 |
|
$ |
680.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
6,135.3 |
|
|
Revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
3,428.6 |
|
415.2 |
|
— |
|
3,843.8 |
| ||||
|
Gross profit |
|
285.4 |
|
(7.7 |
) |
— |
|
277.7 |
| ||||
|
Equity in earnings of joint ventures |
|
12.5 |
|
25.7 |
|
— |
|
38.2 |
| ||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
¾ |
|
¾ |
|
(63.2 |
) |
(63.2 |
) | ||||
|
Operating income |
|
297.9 |
|
18.0 |
|
(63.2 |
) |
252.7 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue |
|
5.2 |
% |
(1.1 |
)% |
— |
|
4.5 |
% | ||||
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue, net of other direct costs(1) |
|
8.3 |
% |
(1.9 |
)% |
— |
|
7.2 |
% | ||||
(1) Non-GAAP measure.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains certain forward-looking statements, including the plans and objectives of management for our business, operations and economic performance. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the context of the statement or the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects,” “plans,” “is confident that,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” or words of similar meaning, with reference to us or our management. Similarly, statements that describe our future operating performance, financial results, financial position, plans, objectives, strategies or goals are forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, these assumptions and the forward-looking statements are subject to various factors, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to, our dependence on long-term government contracts, which are subject to uncertainties concerning the government’s budgetary approval process, the possibility that our government contracts may be terminated by the government, the risk of employee misconduct or our failure to comply with laws and regulations, and our ability to successfully execute our mergers and acquisitions strategy, including the integration of new companies into our business. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by any forward-looking statement. Please review “Part II, Item 1A — Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report for a discussion of the factors, risks and uncertainties that could affect our future results.
Overview
We are a leading provider of professional technical and management support services for public and private clients around the world. We provide our services in a broad range of end markets through a network of approximately 46,000 employees.
Our business focuses primarily on providing fee-based professional technical and support services and therefore our business is labor and not capital intensive. We derive income from our ability to generate revenue and collect cash from our clients through the billing of our employees’ time spent on client projects and our ability to manage our costs. We report our business through two segments: Professional Technical Services (PTS) and Management Support Services (MSS).
Our PTS segment delivers planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design, and program and construction management services to commercial and government clients worldwide in major end markets such as transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government markets. PTS revenue is primarily derived from fees from services that we provide, as opposed to pass-through fees from subcontractors and other direct costs.
Our MSS segment provides program and facilities management and maintenance, training, logistics, consulting, technical assistance and systems integration services, primarily for agencies of the U.S. Government. MSS revenue typically includes a significant amount of pass-through fees from subcontractors and other direct costs.
Our revenue is dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified and productive employees, identify business opportunities, integrate and maximize the value of our recent acquisitions, allocate our labor resources to profitable and high growth markets, secure new contracts and renew existing client agreements. Demand for our services is cyclical and may be vulnerable to sudden economic downturns and reductions in government and private industry spending, which may result in clients delaying, curtailing or canceling proposed and existing projects. Moreover, as a professional services company, maintaining the high quality of the work generated by our employees is integral to our revenue generation and profitability.
Our costs consist primarily of the compensation we pay to our employees, including salaries, fringe benefits, the costs of hiring subcontractors and other project-related expenses, and sales, general and administrative costs.
We define revenue provided by acquired companies as revenue included in the current period up to twelve months subsequent to their acquisition date. Throughout this section, we refer to companies we acquired in the last twelve months as “acquired companies.”
Components of Income and Expense
Our management analyzes the results of our operations using several financial measures not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). A significant portion of our revenue relates to services provided by subcontractors and other non-employees that we categorize as “other direct costs.” Those costs are typically paid to service providers upon our receipt of payment from the client. We segregate other direct costs from revenue resulting in a measurement that we refer to as “revenue, net of other direct costs,” which is a measure of work performed by AECOM employees. A large portion of our fees are derived through work performed by AECOM employees rather than other parties. We have included information on revenue, net of other direct costs, as we believe that it is useful to view our revenue exclusive of costs associated with external service providers, and the related gross margins, as discussed in Results of Operations below. Because of the importance of maintaining the high quality of work generated by our employees, gross margin is an important metric that we review in evaluating our operating performance.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, a presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures reconciled to the closest GAAP measures:
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||||||
|
Other Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,067.5 |
|
$ |
2,095.2 |
|
$ |
6,074.4 |
|
$ |
6,135.3 |
|
|
Other direct costs (1) |
|
831.5 |
|
771.7 |
|
2,341.5 |
|
2,291.5 |
| ||||
|
Revenue, net of other direct costs (1) |
|
1,236.0 |
|
1,323.5 |
|
3,732.9 |
|
3,843.8 |
| ||||
|
Cost of revenue, net of other direct costs (1) |
|
1,104.2 |
|
1,212.3 |
|
3,423.1 |
|
3,566.1 |
| ||||
|
Gross profit |
|
131.8 |
|
111.2 |
|
309.8 |
|
277.7 |
| ||||
|
Equity in earnings of joint ventures |
|
4.1 |
|
12.3 |
|
17.9 |
|
38.2 |
| ||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
(24.0 |
) |
(20.7 |
) |
(73.4 |
) |
(63.2 |
) | ||||
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
$ |
102.8 |
|
$ |
254.3 |
|
$ |
252.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Reconciliation of Cost of Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other direct costs |
|
$ |
831.5 |
|
$ |
771.7 |
|
$ |
2,341.5 |
|
$ |
2,291.5 |
|
|
Cost of revenue, net of other direct costs |
|
1,104.2 |
|
1,212.3 |
|
3,423.1 |
|
3,566.1 |
| ||||
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
1,935.7 |
|
$ |
1,984.0 |
|
$ |
5,764.6 |
|
$ |
5,857.6 |
|
(1) Non-GAAP measure.
Results of Operations
Three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012
Consolidated Results
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
Change |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
Change |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
|
% |
| ||||||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,067.5 |
|
$ |
2,095.2 |
|
$ |
(27.7 |
) |
(1.3 |
)% |
$ |
6,074.4 |
|
$ |
6,135.3 |
|
$ |
(60.9 |
) |
(1.0 |
)% |
|
Other direct costs |
|
831.5 |
|
771.7 |
|
59.8 |
|
7.7 |
|
2,341.5 |
|
2,291.5 |
|
50.0 |
|
2.2 |
| ||||||
|
Revenue, net of other direct costs |
|
1,236.0 |
|
1,323.5 |
|
(87.5 |
) |
(6.6 |
) |
3,732.9 |
|
3,843.8 |
|
(110.9 |
) |
(2.9 |
) | ||||||
|
Cost of revenue, net of other direct costs |
|
1,104.2 |
|
1,212.3 |
|
(108.1 |
) |
(8.9 |
) |
||||||||||||||