UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 40-F
(Check One)
[ ] Registration statement pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or
[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Commission file number 1-15226
ENCANA CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Canada |
|
1311 |
|
Not applicable |
1800-855 2nd Street, S.W., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2S5
(403) 645-2000
(Address and Telephone Number of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
CT Corporation System, 111 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10011
(212) 894-8940
(Name, Address (Including Zip Code) and Telephone Number
(Including Area Code) of Agent For Service in the United States)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. Debt Securities
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
[X] Annual Information Form |
|
[X] Audited Annual Financial Statements |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 736,327,987
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (s.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes No
The Annual Report on Form 40-F shall be incorporated by reference into or as an exhibit to, as applicable, each of the registrants Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933: Form F-3 (File No. 333-150453), Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-124218, 333-85598 and 333-140856) and Form F-9 (File No. 333-165626).
FORM 40-F
Principal Documents
The following documents have been filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F, beginning on the following page:
(a) Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011;
(b) Managements Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011; and
(c) Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains a reconciliation of those financial statements to United States Generally Accepting Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP)).
Encana Corporation
Annual Information Form
February 23, 2012
|
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
7 | |
8 | |
12 | |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | |
19 | |
20 | |
20 | |
21 | |
22 | |
22 | |
23 | |
26 | |
28 | |
30 | |
31 | |
31 | |
32 | |
32 | |
38 | |
38 | |
38 | |
39 | |
Note Regarding Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information |
40 |
Appendix A - Canadian Protocol Disclosure of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information |
A-1 |
B-1 | |
C-1 | |
Appendix D - U.S. Protocol Disclosure of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information |
D-1 |
E-1 |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
|
This is the annual information form of Encana Corporation (Encana or the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011. In this annual information form, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, reference to Encana or to the Company includes reference to subsidiaries of and partnership interests held by Encana Corporation and its subsidiaries.
In this annual information form, daily natural gas volumes are referenced in either thousands of cubic feet (Mcf) per day (Mcf/d), millions of cubic feet (MMcf) per day (MMcf/d), or billions of cubic feet (Bcf) per day (Bcf/d). The term liquids is used to represent oil, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate. Daily liquids volumes are referenced in either barrels (bbls) per day (bbls/d), thousands of barrels (Mbbls) per day (Mbbls/d) or millions of barrels (MMbbls) per day (MMbbls/d).
Certain liquids volumes have been converted to thousands of cubic feet equivalent (Mcfe), millions of cubic feet equivalent (MMcfe) or billions of cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) on the basis of one barrel (bbl) to six Mcf. Also, certain natural gas volumes have been converted to barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) on the same basis. Mcfe, MMcfe, Bcfe and BOE may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. An Mcfe, MMcfe or Bcfe conversion ratio of one bbl to six Mcf is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value.
On January 1, 2011, Encana adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for financial reporting purposes, using a transition date of January 1, 2010. The Companys annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, including 2010 required comparative information, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Prior to 2011, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (previous GAAP).
Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information included in this annual information form is determined using IFRS, which differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Note 27 to Encanas annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contains a discussion of the principal differences between Encanas financial results calculated under IFRS and U.S. GAAP.
Readers are directed to the sections titled Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Note Regarding Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information.
Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States (U.S.) dollars, all references to dollars, $ or to US$ are to U.S. dollars and all references to C$ are to Canadian dollars. All proceeds from divestitures are provided on a before-tax basis.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
|
Name and Incorporation
Encana Corporation is incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA). Its executive and registered office is located at 1800, 855 - 2nd Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2S5.
On November 30, 2009, Encana completed a corporate reorganization (the Split Transaction) to split into two independent publicly traded energy companies Encana and Cenovus Energy Inc. (Cenovus). In conjunction with the Split Transaction, Encanas articles were amended to make certain changes to its share capital. Further information on the Companys share capital is disclosed under Description of Share Capital.
Intercorporate Relationships
The following table presents the name, the percentage of voting securities owned and the jurisdiction of incorporation, continuance or formation of Encanas principal subsidiaries and partnerships as at December 31, 2011. Each of these subsidiaries and partnerships had total assets that exceeded 10 percent of Encanas total consolidated assets or annual revenues that exceeded 10 percent of Encanas total consolidated annual revenues as at December 31, 2011.
Subsidiaries & Partnerships |
|
Percentage |
|
Jurisdiction of | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Encana USA Holdings |
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
3080763 Nova Scotia Company |
|
100 |
|
|
Nova Scotia |
Alenco Inc. |
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. |
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
Encana Marketing (USA) Inc. |
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
Encana USA Investment Holdings |
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
The above table does not include all of the subsidiaries and partnerships of Encana. The assets and annual revenues of unnamed subsidiaries and partnerships in the aggregate did not exceed 20 percent of Encanas total consolidated assets or total consolidated annual revenues as at December 31, 2011.
As a general matter, Encana reorganizes its subsidiaries as required to maintain proper alignment of its business, operating and management structures.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
General Development of the Business
|
Encana was formed in 2002 through the business combination of Alberta Energy Company Ltd. (AEC) and PanCanadian Energy Corporation (PanCanadian). On November 30, 2009, Encana completed the Split Transaction which resulted in two independent publicly traded energy companies Encana and Cenovus.
Encana is a leading North American energy producer that is focused on growing its strong portfolio of diverse resource plays producing natural gas, oil and NGLs. Encanas other operations include the transportation and marketing of natural gas, oil and NGLs. All of Encanas reserves and production are located in North America.
Operating Divisions
Encana employs a decentralized decision making structure and is currently divided into two operating divisions. The operating divisions are:
· Canadian Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of natural gas, oil and NGLs and other related activities within Canada. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Greater Sierra in northeast British Columbia, including Horn River; (ii) Cutbank Ridge in Alberta and British Columbia, including Montney; (iii) Bighorn in west central Alberta; and (iv) Coalbed Methane (CBM) in southern Alberta. The Canadian Division also includes the Deep Panuke natural gas project offshore Nova Scotia.
· USA Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of natural gas, oil and NGLs and other related activities within the U.S. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Jonah in southwest Wyoming; (ii) Piceance in northwest Colorado; (iii) Haynesville in Louisiana; and (iv) Texas, including East Texas and North Texas.
Encanas proprietary production is substantially sold by the Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals team, which is focused on enhancing the Companys netback price. Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals manages Encanas market optimization activities, which include third-party purchases and sales of product to provide operational flexibility for transportation commitments, product type, delivery points and customer diversification.
Encanas Natural Gas Economy team focuses on pursuing the development of expanded natural gas markets in North America, particularly within the areas of power generation, transportation and industrial applications. Due to the technical breakthroughs which have enhanced natural gas extraction, the commercial resource in North America has grown to a historical high. This abundance improves the longer term affordability and reliability of natural gas for these potential markets. In addition, increased use of natural gas has the potential to yield lower greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions as compared to other fossil fuel use.
For 2011 financial reporting purposes, Encanas reportable segments were: (i) Canada; (ii) USA; (iii) Market Optimization; and (iv) Corporate and Other. Corporate and Other is not an operating segment and mainly includes unrealized gains or losses recognized on derivative financial instruments. Once the instruments are settled, the realized gains and losses are recognized in the operating segment to which the derivative instruments relate.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Recent Developments
Significant events which contributed to the development of Encanas business over the last three years included the following:
2011
· Acquired various strategic exploration and evaluation lands and properties which complement existing assets within Encanas portfolio, totaling $515 million. Land capture included additional acreage with potential oil and natural gas streams with associated liquids.
· Completed planned divestitures for total proceeds of $891 million of Encanas interest in the Cabin natural gas processing plant in British Columbia, the Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant in Colorado and the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets in Colorado.
· Closed the majority of the sale of its North Texas natural gas producing assets for proceeds of $836 million. On February 7, 2012, Encana received additional proceeds of $91 million. The remainder of the sale, for proceeds of approximately $24 million, is subject to completion of additional closing conditions and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2012.
· Agreed to sell two natural gas processing plants in the Cutbank Ridge area of British Columbia for approximately C$920 million. The sale closed on February 9, 2012 and the proceeds were received.
· Entered into negotiations with Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi) to jointly develop certain undeveloped lands owned by Encana. On February 17, 2012, Encana announced that the Company and Mitsubishi had entered into a partnership agreement for the development of Cutbank Ridge lands in British Columbia. Under the agreement, Mitsubishi will invest approximately C$2.9 billion for a 40 percent interest in the partnership. The transaction is expected to close by the end of February 2012.
· Entered into deep cut processing arrangements, which will allow the Company to extract additional NGL volumes from its natural gas streams starting in 2012 at the Musreau and Gordondale plants in the Alberta Deep Basin.
· Acquired a 30 percent interest in the planned Kitimat liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal in British Columbia.
· Entered into an agreement to be the sole LNG fueling supplier to a fleet of 200 LNG heavy-duty trucks in Louisiana through its mobile and permanent LNG fueling stations and opened four compressed natural gas fueling stations.
· Ended negotiations with PetroChina International Investment Company, a subsidiary of PetroChina Company Limited (PetroChina), for a proposed joint venture concerning a 50 percent interest in Encanas Cutbank Ridge business assets after the parties were unable to achieve substantial alignment with respect to key elements of the proposed transaction. Negotiations with PetroChina commenced in 2010.
2010
· Entered into farm-out agreements with Kogas Canada Ltd., a subsidiary of Korea Gas Corporation (Kogas), which agreed to invest approximately C$565 million over three years to earn a 50 percent interest in approximately 154,000 acres of land in Horn River and Montney in the Greater Sierra and Cutbank Ridge key resource plays. In 2011, Encana extended a farm-out agreement with Kogas for an additional investment of C$185 million for approximately 20,000 additional acres.
· Acquired various strategic lands and properties that complement existing assets within Encanas portfolio. In 2010, acquisitions were $592 million in the Canadian Division and $141 million in the USA Division.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
· Completed the divestiture of non-core assets for proceeds of approximately $288 million in the Canadian Division and $595 million in the USA Division.
2009
· Completed the Split Transaction on November 30, 2009, resulting in Encana and Cenovus. The Split Transaction was initially proposed in May 2008 and was designed to enhance long-term value for shareholders by creating two independent and sustainable companies. In October 2008, due to an unusually high level of uncertainty and volatility in the global debt and equity markets, Encana delayed seeking shareholder and court approval for the Split Transaction until there were clear signs that the global financial markets had stabilized. In September 2009, Encana announced plans to proceed with the split.
In connection with the Split Transaction, Encana entered into an Arrangement Agreement with Cenovus and another subsidiary of Encana dated October 20, 2009 and a Separation and Transition Agreement with Cenovus dated November 20, 2009. The Arrangement Agreement set out the terms and conditions to the arrangement, including the plan of arrangement. The Separation and Transition Agreement set out the mechanics for the separation of the businesses including the dividing of assets, assumption of liabilities and matters governing certain ongoing relationships between Encana and Cenovus, including reciprocal indemnities with respect to the assets and liabilities kept by Encana or transferred to Cenovus.
· Completed the divestiture of mature conventional oil and natural gas assets for proceeds of approximately $1,000 million in the Canadian Division, $73 million in the USA Division and $17 million related to the Canadian upstream assets transferred to Cenovus.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Narrative Description of the Business
|
The following map outlines the location of Encanas North American landholdings and key resource plays as at December 31, 2011.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Encanas operations are focused on exploiting North American long-life natural gas and oil formations. Encana attempts to identify early-stage, geographically expansive hydrocarbon-charged basins and then assembles a large land position to try to capture core resource opportunities. Encana then focuses on determining cost efficient means for extracting natural gas, oil, and NGLs through a combination of detailed reservoir studies and pilot testing available and emerging drilling and completions technologies. Encanas manufacturing-style development approach extends over many years. Capital and operating efficiencies are pursued on an ongoing basis and applied across Encanas expansive portfolio.
Encanas operations are primarily located in Canada and the U.S. All of Encanas reserves and production are located in North America.
The Canadian Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of, natural gas, oil and NGLs and other related activities within Canada. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Greater Sierra in northeast British Columbia, including Horn River; (ii) Cutbank Ridge in Alberta and British Columbia, including Montney; (iii) Bighorn in west central Alberta; and (iv) CBM in southern Alberta. The Canadian Division also includes the Deep Panuke natural gas project offshore Nova Scotia.
In 2011, the Canadian Division had total capital investment in Canada of approximately $2,022 million and drilled approximately 727 net wells. As at December 31, 2011, the Canadian Division had an established land position in Canada of approximately 10.1 million gross acres (8.5 million net acres), including approximately 5.2 million gross undeveloped acres (4.4 million net acres). The mineral rights on approximately 42 percent of the total net acreage are owned in fee title by Encana, which means that the mineral rights are held by Encana in perpetuity and production is subject to a mineral tax that is generally less than the Crown royalty imposed on production from land where the government owns the mineral rights.
The Canadian Divisions 2011 natural gas production after royalties averaged approximately 1,454 MMcf/d, an increase over 2010 of approximately 131 MMcf/d, or 10 percent. Oil and NGL production after royalties averaged approximately 14.5 Mbbls/d for 2011, an increase over 2010 of approximately 1.3 Mbbls/d, or 10 percent. The increase in natural gas, oil and NGL production was primarily due to successful drilling programs across all key resource plays.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The following tables summarize the Canadian Division landholdings, producing wells and daily production as at and for the periods indicated. In 2011, Encana realigned the producing assets contained in some of its key resource plays.
Landholdings |
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
Total |
|
Average | ||||||
(thousands of acres at December 31, 2011) |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Sierra |
|
557 |
|
511 |
|
1,264 |
|
1,041 |
|
1,821 |
|
1,552 |
|
85% |
Cutbank Ridge |
|
446 |
|
358 |
|
911 |
|
793 |
|
1,357 |
|
1,151 |
|
85% |
Bighorn |
|
257 |
|
179 |
|
257 |
|
205 |
|
514 |
|
384 |
|
75% |
CBM |
|
3,403 |
|
2,931 |
|
1,820 |
|
1,661 |
|
5,223 |
|
4,592 |
|
88% |
Key Resource Plays |
|
4,663 |
|
3,979 |
|
4,252 |
|
3,700 |
|
8,915 |
|
7,679 |
|
86% |
Atlantic Canada |
|
20 |
|
20 |
|
56 |
|
12 |
|
76 |
|
32 |
|
42% |
Other |
|
186 |
|
86 |
|
899 |
|
708 |
|
1,085 |
|
794 |
|
73% |
Total Canadian Division |
|
4,869 |
|
4,085 |
|
5,207 |
|
4,420 |
|
10,076 |
|
8,505 |
|
84% |
Producing Wells
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil |
|
Total | ||||||
(number of wells at December 31, 2011) (1) |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
Greater Sierra |
|
973 |
|
907 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
973 |
|
907 |
Cutbank Ridge |
|
996 |
|
845 |
|
20 |
|
6 |
|
1,016 |
|
851 |
Bighorn |
|
459 |
|
366 |
|
28 |
|
8 |
|
487 |
|
374 |
CBM |
|
11,425 |
|
10,448 |
|
183 |
|
147 |
|
11,608 |
|
10,595 |
Key Resource Plays |
|
13,853 |
|
12,566 |
|
231 |
|
161 |
|
14,084 |
|
12,727 |
Other |
|
19 |
|
12 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
21 |
|
13 |
Total Canadian Division |
|
13,872 |
|
12,578 |
|
233 |
|
162 |
|
14,105 |
|
12,740 |
Notes:
(1) Figures exclude wells capable of producing, but not producing.
Production (Before Royalties) |
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil & NGLs | ||||
(average daily) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Sierra |
|
275 |
|
239 |
|
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
Cutbank Ridge |
|
571 |
|
486 |
|
3.9 |
|
2.7 |
Bighorn |
|
233 |
|
226 |
|
4.5 |
|
4.4 |
CBM |
|
440 |
|
401 |
|
7.0 |
|
6.1 |
Key Resource Plays (1) |
|
1,519 |
|
1,352 |
|
16.5 |
|
14.4 |
Other |
|
2 |
|
29 |
|
- |
|
1.3 |
Total Canadian Division |
|
1,521 |
|
1,381 |
|
16.5 |
|
15.7 |
Note:
(1) Key resource play areas were realigned in 2011, with comparative information restated.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Production (After Royalties) |
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil & NGLs | ||||
(average daily) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Sierra |
|
260 |
|
230 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.0 |
Cutbank Ridge |
|
529 |
|
449 |
|
3.2 |
|
2.0 |
Bighorn |
|
230 |
|
220 |
|
3.5 |
|
3.2 |
CBM |
|
433 |
|
395 |
|
7.0 |
|
6.0 |
Key Resource Plays (1) |
|
1,452 |
|
1,294 |
|
14.5 |
|
12.2 |
Other |
|
2 |
|
29 |
|
- |
|
1.0 |
Total Canadian Division |
|
1,454 |
|
1,323 |
|
14.5 |
|
13.2 |
Note:
(1) Key resource play areas were realigned in 2011, with comparative information restated.
Key Resource Plays and Activities in the Canadian Division
Greater Sierra
Greater Sierra is a key resource play located in northeast British Columbia. The primary focus is on the continued development of the Devonian Jean Marie formation and the Horn River Devonian shale formation. In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 34 net wells in the area and production after royalties averaged approximately 260 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 0.8 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs.
At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 373,000 gross undeveloped acres (272,000 net acres) in the Devonian shale formation of Horn River in northeast British Columbia. Horn River formation shales (Muskwa, Otter Park and Evie) within Encanas focus area are upwards of 500 feet thick. At December 31, 2011, these shales have been evaluated with approximately 112 gross wells (11 vertical and 101 horizontal), 70 of which have been placed on long-term production (1 vertical and 69 horizontal). At December 31, 2011, Encana held an average 76 percent working interest in 10 production facilities in the area that were capable of processing approximately 726 MMcf/d of natural gas.
In November 2011, Encana sold its working interest in the Ekwan pipeline to TransCanada Pipelines Limited (TCPL) following the National Energy Boards approval of TCPLs pipeline in the Horn River area. TCPLs pipeline will interconnect the Horn River area to its Alberta pipeline system. As part of the transfer agreement with TCPL, Encana will continue to have gathering capacity on the Ekwan pipeline.
In December 2011, Encana completed the sale of the majority of its interest in the Cabin natural gas processing plant in the Horn River area for proceeds of approximately $48 million, net of amounts recovered for capital expenditures incurred prior to the sale of the plant. Encana remains the operator of the Cabin plant. As part of the sale agreement, Encana will have processing capacity at the Cabin plant.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Cutbank Ridge
Cutbank Ridge is a key resource play located in the Canadian Rocky Mountain foothills, southwest of Dawson Creek, British Columbia. Key producing horizons in Cutbank Ridge include the Montney, Cadomin and Doig formations. Montney and Cadomin are almost exclusively being developed with horizontal well technology. Significant improvements have been achieved with respect to horizontal well completions with the application of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 55 net wells in the area and production after royalties averaged approximately 529 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 3.2 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs.
At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 724,000 net acres covering the deep basin Montney formation, with approximately 252,000 net acres located within Encanas core development area near Dawson Creek, British Columbia. Encana has tested Montney extensively over the last several years and by applying advanced technology has reduced overall development costs significantly, achieving a greater than 65 percent reduction in costs on a completed interval basis over the past five years.
Encana holds a 60 percent working interest in the Sexsmith gas plant, which has sour gas processing capacity of approximately 125 MMcf/d and an additional 50 MMcf/d of sweet gas processing capacity.
In December 2011, Encana announced the sale of its interest in the Hythe and Steeprock natural gas processing plants, including compression and associated gathering pipelines, for proceeds of approximately C$920 million. The natural gas plants had sour gas processing capacity of approximately 374 MMcf/d with an additional 142 MMcf/d of sweet gas processing capacity. The sale of the natural gas processing plants closed on February 9, 2012 and the proceeds were received. As part of the sale, Encana has entered into an agreement for firm gathering and processing services in the Cutbank Ridge area.
During 2011, Encana entered into negotiations with Mitsubishi to jointly develop certain undeveloped lands owned by Encana. On February 17, 2012, Encana announced that the Company and Mitsubishi had entered into a partnership agreement for the development of Cutbank Ridge lands in British Columbia. Under the agreement, Encana will own 60 percent and Mitsubishi will own 40 percent of the partnership. Mitsubishi will pay approximately C$1.45 billion on closing and will invest approximately C$1.45 billion in addition to its 40 percent of the partnerships future capital investment for a commitment period, which is expected to be about five years, thereby reducing Encanas capital funding commitments to 30 percent of the total expected capital investment over that period. The transaction does not include any of Encanas current Cutbank Ridge production, processing plants, gathering systems or the Companys Alberta landholdings. The transaction is expected to close by the end of February 2012.
In 2010, Encana signed a deep cut processing agreement securing approximately 90 MMcf/d of firm processing capacity at Gordondale. The agreement allows the Company to extract NGLs from its natural gas stream. The addition of deep cut facilities in Gordondale, expected to come on-stream in 2012, will provide additional capacity for Encanas NGL extraction initiative.
Bighorn
Bighorn is a key resource play in west central Alberta. The primary focus is on exploiting multi-zone stacked Cretaceous sands in the Deep Basin. The primary properties in Bighorn are Resthaven, Kakwa, Redrock and Berland. In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 40 net wells in the area and production after royalties averaged approximately 230 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 3.5 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs. At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 514,000 gross acres (384,000 net acres) in the resource play.
Encana has a working interest in a number of natural gas plants within Bighorn. The Resthaven plant, in which Encana has an approximately 70 percent working interest, has a capacity of approximately 100 MMcf/d. In October 2011, Encana signed an agreement that is expected to result in an unrelated third-party investing approximately $230 million to expand the Resthaven plants processing and NGL extraction capacity. The expansion is scheduled to come on-stream in late 2013.
Encana owns 50 percent of the Kakwa gas plant and has firm processing capacity for the remaining 50 percent. The plant has a capacity of approximately 60 MMcf/d. Encana also holds a 24 percent working interest in the Berland River plant, which has a capacity of approximately 165 MMcf/d.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
In 2010, Encana signed a deep cut processing agreement securing approximately 144 MMcf/d of firm processing capacity at Musreau. The agreement allows the Company to extract NGLs from its natural gas stream. In 2011, Encana expanded its deep cut facilities at Musreau, which are expected to come on-stream in the first quarter of 2012.
CBM
CBM is a key resource play that extends from the U.S. border to central Alberta. The primary focus of Encanas CBM key resource play is the development of the Horseshoe Canyon coals integrated with shallower sands, as well as exploiting deeper targets using an integrated wellbore strategy. Additionally, multiple oil horizons are also being tested on fee title lands through farm-outs with third parties. In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 596 net wells in the area and production after royalties averaged approximately 433 MMcf/d of natural gas and 7.0 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs.
At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 4.6 million net acres with approximately 2.1 million net acres on the Horseshoe Canyon trend. Approximately 77 percent of the total net acreage landholdings are owned in fee title.
Atlantic Canada
Encana is the owner and operator of the Deep Panuke gas field, located offshore Nova Scotia. The Deep Panuke natural gas project involves the installation of the facilities required to produce natural gas from the field, located approximately 250 kilometres southeast of Halifax (on the Scotian shelf). Produced gas will be transported to shore by subsea pipeline and Encana will transport this natural gas via the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline to a delivery point in eastern Canada. Work has been progressing in anticipation of first production in mid-2012.
At December 31, 2011, Encana held an interest in approximately 76,000 gross acres (32,000 net acres) in Atlantic Canada, which includes Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. Encana operates six of its nine licenses in these areas and has an average working interest of approximately 42 percent.
Other
At December 31, 2011, Encana held an interest in approximately 513,000 gross acres (373,000 net acres) in the Duvernay Shale play in Alberta, consisting of potential natural gas streams with associated liquids. In 2012, the Company plans to drill five net evaluation wells in the area.
The USA Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of, natural gas, oil and NGLs and other related activities within the U.S. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Jonah in southwest Wyoming; (ii) Piceance in northwest Colorado; (iii) Haynesville in Louisiana; and (iv) Texas, including East Texas and North Texas.
In 2011, the USA Division had total capital investment of approximately $2,423 million and drilled approximately 402 net wells. As at December 31, 2011, the USA Division had an established land position of approximately 2.8 million gross acres (2.4 million net acres), including approximately 2.2 million gross undeveloped acres (1.9 million net acres).
The USA Divisions 2011 natural gas production after royalties averaged approximately 1,879 MMcf/d, an increase over 2010 of approximately 18 MMcf/d. The increase was due to operational success in Haynesville, partially offset by net divestitures and natural declines. The USA Divisions 2011 oil and NGL production after royalties averaged approximately 9.5 Mbbls/d, consistent with 2010 volumes.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The following tables summarize the USA Division landholdings, producing wells and daily production as at and for the periods indicated. In 2011, Encana realigned the producing assets contained in some of its key resource plays.
Landholdings |
|
Developed |
|
|
Undeveloped |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
| ||||||||||||
(thousands of acres at December 31, 2011) |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah |
|
19 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
90% |
|
Piceance |
|
258 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
Texas |
|
109 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
Haynesville |
|
154 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
59% |
|
Key Resource Plays |
|
540 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
81% |
|
Other |
|
106 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
93% |
|
Total USA Division |
|
646 |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
86% |
|
Producing Wells
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil |
|
Total | |||||||||||||||||
(number of wells at December 31, 2011) (1) |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah |
|
1,371 |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
1,194 |
|
Piceance |
|
3,602 |
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
3,056 |
|
Texas |
|
774 |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
494 |
|
Haynesville |
|
409 |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
216 |
|
Key Resource Plays |
|
6,156 |
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
6,159 |
|
|
4,960 |
|
Other |
|
1,660 |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
1,126 |
|
Total USA Division |
|
7,816 |
|
|
6,083 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
7,824 |
|
|
6,086 |
|
Notes:
(1) Figures exclude wells capable of producing, but not producing.
Production (Before Royalties) |
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
| |||||||||||
(average daily) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
5.9 |
|
Piceance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Haynesville |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Key Resource Plays (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
8.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
Total USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
11.9 |
|
Note:
(1) Key resource play areas were realigned in 2011, with comparative information restated.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Production (After Royalties) |
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
| |||||||||||
(average daily) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
Piceance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Haynesville |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Key Resource Plays (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Total USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
Note:
(1) Key resource play areas were realigned in 2011, with comparative information restated.
Key Resource Plays and Activities in the USA Division
Jonah
Jonah is a key resource play located in the Green River Basin in southwest Wyoming. Production is from the Lance formation, which contains vertically stacked sands that exist at depths between 8,500 and 13,000 feet. In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 71 net wells within the core area and production after royalties averaged approximately 471 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 4.3 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs.
In 2011, Encana finalized a joint venture agreement under which Encana has drilled approximately 19 net wells utilizing third-party funds. For the period of 2012 to 2015, Encana expects to drill approximately 59 net wells, which will be partially funded by third parties under existing agreements.
At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 117,000 gross undeveloped acres (104,000 net acres). Historically, Encanas operations have been conducted in the over-pressured core portion of the field. Development in the adjacent normally pressured lands began in 2008 and has continued through 2011. Within the over-pressured area, Encana plans to drill the field to ten acre spacing with higher densities in some areas. Outside of the over-pressured area, Encana owns approximately 114,000 gross undeveloped acres, where 40 acre and possibly 20 acre drilling potential exists.
Piceance
Piceance is a key resource play located in northwest Colorado. The basin is characterized by thick natural gas accumulations primarily in the Williams Fork formation. In addition to Williams Fork, Encana has begun exploration drilling in the Niobrara formation, a thick shale predominant throughout the basin. In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 141 net wells and production after royalties averaged approximately 435 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 1.9 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs. At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 638,000 gross undeveloped acres (589,000 net acres).
Between 2006 and 2011, Encana finalized 11 agreements to jointly develop portions of Piceance. During 2011, Encana drilled approximately 120 net wells primarily utilizing third-party funds. For the period of 2012 to 2017, it is expected that Encana will drill approximately 703 net wells which will be partially funded by third parties under existing agreements.
During 2011, Encana completed the sale of the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets for proceeds of approximately $547 million. Under the sale agreement, Encana will continue to have access to gathering services. The Companys remaining compression and processing facilities in Piceance include approximately 1,444 kilometres of pipelines and a processing facility with a capacity of approximately 60 MMcf/d. In addition, Encana has access to third-party processing facilities within Piceance.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Texas
Texas is a key resource play with current operations primarily located in East Texas. Operations in East Texas are characterized as a gas play containing tight gas with multi-zone targets in the Bossier and Cotton Valley zones, as well as shale gas in the Haynesville and Mid-Bossier horizons.
In December 2011, Encana closed the majority of the sale of its North Texas natural gas producing assets from the Barnett shale in the Forth Worth Basin for proceeds of $836 million. On February 7, 2012, Encana received additional proceeds of $91 million. The remainder of the sale, for proceeds of approximately $24 million, is subject to completion of additional closing conditions and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2012.
In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 41 net wells in Texas and production after royalties averaged approximately 376 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 0.3 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs. In 2011, production after royalties for the North Texas producing assets disposed of totaled approximately 90 MMcf/d of natural gas and approximately 0.2 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs. At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 238,000 gross undeveloped acres (171,000 net acres).
Haynesville
The Haynesville shale is a key resource play located in Louisiana. Encana drilled its first wells in 2006 and has continued to develop the lands using a multi-well pad approach in key areas. Encana has entered into joint venture agreements with unrelated third parties to explore and develop the assets in this area.
In 2011, Encana drilled approximately 87 net wells in the area and production after royalties averaged approximately 508 MMcf/d of natural gas. The majority of the development activity in the area focuses on the maximization of gas recovery in Haynesville and Mid-Bossier horizons.
At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 201,000 gross undeveloped acres (121,000 net acres), with the majority of the leaseholds in North Louisiana being located in the DeSoto and Red River parishes. Certain Haynesville undeveloped acreage is subject to leases that will expire over the next several years unless production is established on the acreage held.
Other Activity
Encana has established a significant land position in the Collingwood/Utica shale play located in Michigan. At December 31, 2011, Encana controlled approximately 430,000 net undeveloped acres. Encana successfully drilled and completed two net horizontal wells in 2011, with an effective horizontal length ranging between 5,300 feet and 7,500 feet.
In 2011, Encana established a significant land position in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale oil play located in Louisiana and Mississippi, and holds approximately 212,000 net acres in this play as at December 31, 2011. Encana successfully completed two horizontal wells, with effective horizontal lengths of approximately 5,000 feet and 7,500 feet, respectively. In 2012, the Company plans to drill six gross evaluation wells in the area.
Encana holds approximately 48,000 net acres in the DJ Basin located in Northern Colorado. The primary formation targets in the basin are the Codell, J-Sand and the Niobrara, the latter consisting of potential natural gas streams with associated liquids. In 2011, Encana successfully drilled and completed five horizontal wells in the Niobrara to test the economic feasibility of the formation. Additional wells are planned for 2012 to help define lateral orientation and length. In 2012, the Company plans to drill 10 gross evaluation wells in the area.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Market Optimization activities are managed by Encanas Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals team, which is responsible for the sale of, and is focused on enhancing the netback price of, the Companys proprietary production. Market Optimization activities include third-party purchases and sales of product to provide operational flexibility for transportation commitments, product type, delivery points and customer diversification.
Natural Gas Marketing
Encanas produced natural gas is primarily marketed to local distribution companies, industrials, other producers and energy marketing companies. Prices received by Encana are based primarily upon prevailing index prices for natural gas in the region in which it is sold. Prices are impacted by regional supply and demand for natural gas and by competing fuels in such markets.
Encana seeks to mitigate the market risk associated with future cash flows by entering into various risk management contracts relating to produced natural gas. Details of those contracts related to Encanas various risk management positions are found in Note 22 to Encanas audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 which are available via the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) at www.sedar.com and the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval System (EDGAR) at www.sec.gov.
Other Marketing Activities
Encana sells its oil, NGLs and condensate to markets in Canada and the U.S. Sales are normally executed under spot, monthly evergreen and term contracts with delivery to major pipeline/sales hubs at current market prices. In addition, Encana holds interests in two power assets, the Cavalier and Balzac Power Stations, to optimize its electricity costs, particularly in Alberta.
Delivery Commitments
As part of ordinary business operations, Encana has a number of delivery commitments to provide natural gas under existing contracts and agreements. The majority of Encanas production is sold under short term contracts at the relevant market price at the time that the product is sold. As at December 31, 2011, Encana had no material long term physical sales contracts or delivery contracts.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Former operations include the Canadian upstream assets and the U.S. downstream refining assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction on November 30, 2009.
The Canadian upstream assets transferred to Cenovus included established natural gas development and production activities in southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan, oil development and production activities in Alberta and Saskatchewan as well as exploration for, and development and production of bitumen using enhanced oil recovery methods in Alberta. The five key resource plays included in these assets were: (i) Shallow Gas in southeast Alberta and Saskatchewan; (ii) Pelican Lake in northeast Alberta; (iii) Weyburn in Saskatchewan; (iv) Foster Creek in northeast Alberta; and (v) Christina Lake in northeast Alberta. The Foster Creek and Christina Lake enhanced oil recovery projects were part of an integrated oil business with ConocoPhillips.
During 2009 and prior to the Split Transaction, Encana drilled approximately 639 net wells on the Canadian upstream properties transferred to Cenovus. Natural gas production after royalties was approximately 762 MMcf/d and oil and NGL production after royalties was approximately 99.9 Mbbls/d.
The U.S. downstream refining assets transferred to Cenovus focused on the refining of oil into petroleum and chemical products at the Borger refinery located in Borger, Texas and the Wood River refinery located in Roxana, Illinois. The refineries were part of an integrated oil business with ConocoPhillips. The refineries were 50 percent owned by Encana and operated by ConocoPhillips.
In 2009, under previous GAAP, the Canadian upstream assets transferred to Cenovus were reported as continuing operations under full cost accounting, while the U.S. downstream refining results were reported as discontinued operations.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Encana is required to provide reserves data prepared in accordance with Canadian securities regulatory requirements, specifically National Instrument 51-101, Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101). Certain reserves and oil and gas information in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements are contained in Appendix A Canadian Protocol Disclosure of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information. Additional disclosure required by NI 51-101 is included in the preceding sections of this annual information form, and referenced accordingly herein. Select supplemental reserves and other oil and gas information disclosure is provided in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements in Appendix D U.S. Protocol Disclosure of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information. See Note Regarding Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information.
The practice of preparing production and reserve quantities data under Canadian disclosure requirements (NI 51-101) differs from the U.S. reporting requirements. The primary differences between the two reporting requirements include:
· |
the Canadian standards require disclosure of proved and probable reserves, while the U.S. standards require disclosure of only proved reserves; |
|
|
· |
the Canadian standards require the use of forecast prices in the estimation of reserves, while the U.S. standards require the use of 12-month average prices which are held constant; |
|
|
· |
the Canadian standards require disclosure of reserves on a gross (before royalties) and net (after royalties) basis, while the U.S standards require disclosure on a net (after royalties) basis; |
|
|
· |
the Canadian standards require disclosure of production on a gross (before royalties) basis, while the U.S. standards require disclosure on a net (after royalties) basis; and |
|
|
· |
the Canadian standards require that reserves and other data be reported on a more granular product type basis than required by the U.S. standards. |
Since its formation in 2002, Encana has retained independent qualified reserves evaluators (IQREs) to evaluate and prepare reports on 100 percent of Encanas natural gas, oil and NGL reserves annually. In 2011, Encanas Canadian reserves were evaluated by McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. and GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., and its U.S. reserves were evaluated by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and DeGolyer and MacNaughton.
Encanas Vice-President, Corporate Reserves & Competitor Analysis and six other staff under this individuals direction oversee the preparation of the reserves estimates by the IQREs. Currently this internal staff of four professional engineers, an engineering technologist and two business analysts have combined relevant experience of over 100 years. The Vice-President and other engineering staff are all members of the appropriate provincial or state professional associations and are members of various industry associations such as the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers.
Encana has a Reserves Committee of independent board members which reviews the qualifications and appointment of the IQREs. The Reserves Committee also reviews the procedures for providing information to the evaluators. All booked reserves are based upon annual evaluations by the IQREs. Annually, the Reserves Committee recommends the selection of IQREs to the Board of Directors for its approval.
The evaluations by the IQREs are conducted from the fundamental petrophysical, geological, engineering, financial and accounting data. Processes and procedures are in place to ensure that the IQREs are in receipt of all relevant information. Reserves are estimated based on material balance analysis, decline analysis, volumetric calculations or a combination of these methods, in all cases having regard to economic considerations. In the case of producing reserves, the emphasis is on decline analysis where volumetric analysis is considered to limit forecasts to reasonable levels. Non-producing reserves are estimated by analogy to producing offsets, with consideration of volumetric estimates of in place quantities.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Encanas growth in recent years has been achieved through a combination of internal growth and acquisitions. Encana has a large inventory of internal growth opportunities and also continues to examine select acquisition opportunities to develop and expand its key resource plays. The acquisition opportunities may include corporate or asset acquisitions. Encana may finance any such acquisitions with debt, equity, cash generated from operations, proceeds from asset divestitures or a combination of any of these sources.
The following table summarizes Encanas net capital investment for 2011 and 2010. Proceeds from divestitures that remain subject to additional closing conditions as at December 31, 2011 are not included.
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Capital Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
2,206 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,445 |
|
4,701 |
|
Market Optimization |
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
|
131 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
4,764 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
410 |
|
592 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
105 |
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
(288 |
) |
USA Division
|
|
|
|
(1,730 |
) |
(595 |
) |
Net Acquisitions and Divestitures
|
|
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
(150 |
) |
Net Capital Investment
|
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
4,614 |
|
Capital investment during 2011 was focused on continued development of Encanas key resource plays. Acquisitions primarily included the purchase of various strategic exploration and evaluation lands and properties that complement existing assets within Encanas portfolio.
Divestitures for 2011 in the Canadian Division included the proceeds from the sale of the Companys interest in the Cabin natural gas processing plant. Divestiture proceeds in the USA Division resulted primarily from the sale of the Companys interest in the Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant, the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets and the North Texas natural gas producing properties.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
All aspects of the oil and gas industry are highly competitive and Encana actively competes with upstream natural gas and other companies, particularly in the following areas:
· Exploration for and development of new sources of natural gas, oil and NGL reserves;
· Reserves and property acquisitions;
· Transportation and marketing of natural gas, oil, NGLs, diluents and electricity;
· Access to services and equipment to carry out exploration, development and operating activities; and
· Attracting and retaining experienced industry personnel.
The oil and gas industry also competes with other industries focused on providing alternative forms of energy to consumers. Competitive forces can lead to cost increases or result in an oversupply of natural gas, oil or NGLs, each of which could have a negative impact on Encanas financial results.
Encanas operations are subject to laws and regulations concerning pollution, protection of the environment and the handling and transportation of hazardous materials. These laws and regulations generally require Encana to remove or remedy the effect of its activities on the environment at present and former operating sites, including dismantling production facilities and remediating damage caused by the use or release of specified substances.
The Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Committee of Encanas Board of Directors reviews and recommends environmental policy to the Board of Directors for approval and oversees compliance with government laws and regulations. Monitoring and reporting programs for environmental, health and safety (EH&S) performance in day-to-day operations, as well as inspections and assessments, are designed to provide assurance that environmental and regulatory standards are met. Contingency plans are in place for a timely response to an environmental event and remediation/reclamation programs are in place and utilized to restore the environment.
Encana monitors developments in emerging climate change policy and legislation, and considers the associated costs of carbon in its strategic planning. The Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Committee of Encanas Board of Directors reviews the impact of a variety of carbon constrained scenarios on Encanas strategy with a current price range from approximately $10 to $50 per tonne of emissions, applied to a range of emissions coverage levels.
Encana expects to incur abandonment and site reclamation costs as existing oil and gas properties are abandoned and reclaimed. In 2011, expenditures for normal compliance with environmental regulations as well as expenditures beyond normal compliance were not material. Based on Encanas current estimate, the total anticipated undiscounted future cost of abandonment and reclamation costs to be incurred over the life of the reserves is estimated at approximately $4.4 billion. As at December 31, 2011, Encana has recorded an asset retirement obligation of $1,043 million.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Encana has a Corporate Responsibility Policy, an Environment Policy and a Health & Safety Policy (the Policies) that articulate Encanas commitment to responsible development. The Policies apply to any activity undertaken by or on behalf of Encana, anywhere in the world, associated with the finding, development, production, transmission and storage of the Companys products including decommissioning of facilities, marketing and other business and administrative functions. The Corporate Responsibility Policy articulates Encanas commitment to conducting its business ethically, legally and in a manner that is fiscally, environmentally and socially responsible, while delivering strong financial performance. The Corporate Responsibility Policy has specific requirements in areas related to governance, people, environment, health and safety, engagement, and community involvement.
With respect to Encanas relationship with the communities in which it does business, the Corporate Responsibility Policy states that Encana will: strive to be a good neighbour by contributing to the well-being of the communities where it operates, recognizing their differing priorities and needs; engaging, listening and working with stakeholders in a timely, respectful and meaningful way; and aligning its community investments with its business strategy and seek to provide mutually beneficial relationships with the community and non-governmental organizations.
With respect to human rights, the Corporate Responsibility Policy states that Encana will abide by all applicable workplace, employment, privacy and human rights legislation. In addition, Encana will provide a respectful, inclusive workplace free from harassment, discrimination and intimidation.
The Environment Policy recognizes that responsible environmental practices contribute to long-term shareholder value creation and articulates Encanas commitment to environmental stewardship. The Environment Policy outlines specific requirements in areas related to: compliance with environmental laws and regulations; environmental risk assessment and mitigation; air emissions management; water sourcing, handling and disposal; pollution prevention and waste minimization; and habitat, plant and wildlife disturbance.
The Health & Safety Policy recognizes that all occupational injuries and illnesses are preventable and states Encanas goal of achieving a workplace free of recognized hazards, occupational injuries and illnesses.
The Policies and any revisions are approved by Encanas Executive Team and its Board of Directors. Accountability for implementation of the Policies is at the operational level within Encanas business units. Business units have established processes to evaluate risks and programs have been implemented to minimize those risks. Coordination and oversight of the Policies resides with the EH&S, Security and Corporate Responsibility Group within Corporate Development, EH&S and Reserves.
Some of the steps that Encana has taken to embed the corporate responsibility approach throughout the organization include:
· |
A comprehensive approach to training and communicating policies and practices and a requirement for acknowledgement and sign-off on key policies from the Board of Directors and employees; |
|
|
· |
An EH&S management system; |
|
|
· |
A security program to regularly assess security threats to business operations and to manage the associated risks; |
|
|
· |
A formalized approach to stakeholder relations with a standardized Stakeholder Engagement Guide and specific Aboriginal Community Engagement Guide; |
|
|
· |
Corporate responsibility performance metrics to track the Companys progress; |
|
|
· |
An environmental efficiency program that focuses on reducing energy and water use at Encanas operations and supports initiatives at the community level while also incenting employees to reduce energy and water use in their homes; |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
· |
A comprehensive community investment program that contributes to charitable and non-profit organizations in the communities in which Encana operates and an employee program that matches employee donations up to $25,000 per employee, per year; |
|
|
· |
An Investigations Practice and an Investigations Committee to review and resolve potential violations of Encana policies or practices and other regulations; |
|
|
· |
An Integrity Hotline that provides an additional avenue for Encanas stakeholders to raise their concerns, and a corporate responsibility website which allows people to write to the Company about non-financial issues of concern; |
|
|
· |
An internal corporate EH&S audit program that evaluates Encanas compliance with the expectations and requirements of the EH&S management system; and |
|
|
· |
Related policies and practices such as an Alcohol and Drug Policy, a Business Conduct & Ethics Practice and guidelines for correct behaviors with respect to the acceptance of gifts, conflicts of interest and the appropriate use of Encana equipment and technology in a manner that is consistent with leading ethical business practices. |
In addition, Encanas Board of Directors approves such policies, and is advised of significant contraventions thereof, and receives updates on trends, issues or events which could have a significant impact on the Company.
At December 31, 2011, Encana employed 4,276 full time equivalent employees (FTE) as set forth in the following table.
|
|
FTE Employees | |
Canadian Division
|
|
1,860 |
|
USA Division
|
|
1,751 |
|
Corporate
|
|
665 |
|
Total
|
|
4,276
|
|
The Company also engages a number of contractors and service providers.
As at December 31, 2011, all of Encanas reserves and production were located in North America, which limits Encanas exposure to risks and uncertainties in countries considered politically and economically unstable. Any operations and related assets outside North America may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policy, social instability or other political or economic developments which are not within the control of Encana, including the expropriation of property, the cancellation or modification of contract rights and restrictions on repatriation of cash.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The following information is provided for each director and executive officer of Encana as at the date of this annual information form.
Directors
Name & Municipality of Residence |
Director |
Principal Occupation |
|
|
|
David P. OBrien, O.C. (5,7,10) Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
1990 |
Chairman Encana Corporation Chairman Royal Bank of Canada |
|
|
|
Peter A. Dea (3,6) Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. |
2010 |
President & Chief Executive Officer Cirque Resources LP (Private oil & gas company) |
|
|
|
Randall K. Eresman (8) Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
2006 |
President & Chief Executive Officer Encana Corporation |
|
|
|
Claire S. Farley (3,5,6) Houston, Texas, U.S.A. |
2008 |
Managing Director Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (Public global investment firm) |
|
|
|
Fred J. Fowler (3,4) Houston, Texas, U.S.A. |
2010 |
Corporate Director |
|
|
|
Barry W. Harrison (2,4,5,9) Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
1996 |
Corporate Director and Independent Businessman |
|
|
|
Suzanne P. Nimocks (2,4) Houston, Texas, U.S.A. |
2010 |
Corporate Director |
|
|
|
Jane L. Peverett (2,5,6) West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
2003 |
Corporate Director |
|
|
|
Allan P. Sawin (2,4) Edmonton, Alberta, Canada |
2007 |
President Bear Investments Inc. (Private investment company) |
|
|
|
Bruce G. Waterman (2,4) Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
2010 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Development & Investment Officer Agrium Inc. (Public agriculture supply company) |
|
|
|
Clayton H. Woitas (3,6) Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
2008 |
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Range Royalty Management Ltd. (Private oil & gas company)
|
Notes:
(1) Denotes the year each individual became a director of Encana or one of its predecessor companies (AEC or PanCanadian).
(2) Member of Audit Committee.
(3) Member of Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health and Safety Committee.
(4) Member of Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
(5) Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
(6) Member of Reserves Committee.
(7) Ex officio non-voting member of all other committees. As an ex officio non-voting member, Mr. OBrien attends as his schedule permits and may vote when necessary to achieve a quorum.
(8) As an officer of Encana and a non-independent director, Mr. Eresman is not a member of any Board committees.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
(9) Mr. Harrison was a director of Gauntlet Energy Corporation in June 2003 when it filed for and was granted an order pursuant to the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada). A plan of arrangement for that company received court confirmation later that year.
(10) Mr. OBrien resigned as a director of Air Canada on November 26, 2003. On April 1, 2003, Air Canada obtained an order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice providing creditor protection under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada). Air Canada also made a concurrent petition under Section 304 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On September 30, 2004, Air Canada announced that it had successfully completed its restructuring process and implemented its Plan of Arrangement.
Encana does not have an Executive Committee of its Board of Directors.
At the date of this annual information form, there are 11 directors of the Company. All of the current directors were elected at the last annual meeting of shareholders held on April 20, 2011. At the next annual meeting, shareholders will be asked to elect as directors each of the individuals listed in the above table, with the exception of Barry W. Harrison, who has reached the Companys mandatory retirement age restrictions for directors. The Companys mandatory retirement age restrictions, which have been established by the Board of Directors, stipulate that a director may not stand for re-election after reaching the age of 71.
Executive Officers
Name & Municipality of Residence |
|
Corporate Office (Divisional Title) |
|
|
|
Randall K. Eresman Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Sherri A. Brillon Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Robert A. Grant Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Executive Vice-President, Corporate Development, EH&S and Reserves |
|
|
|
Terrence J. Hopwood Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Executive Vice-President & General Counsel |
|
|
|
Eric D. Marsh Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. |
|
Executive Vice-President, Natural Gas Economy (Senior Vice-President, USA Division) |
|
|
|
Michael G. McAllister Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Executive Vice-President (Acting President, Canadian Division) |
|
|
|
R. William Oliver Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Executive Vice-President & Chief Corporate Officer |
|
|
|
William A. Stevenson Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Executive Vice-President & Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
Jeff E. Wojahn Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. |
|
Executive Vice-President (President, USA Division) |
|
|
|
Renee E. Zemljak Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. |
|
Executive Vice-President, Midstream, Marketing & Fundamentals |
|
|
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
During the last five years, all of the directors and executive officers have served in various capacities with Encana or its predecessor companies or have held the principal occupation indicated opposite their names except for the following:
Ms. Farley is a Managing Director in Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.s (KKR) energy and infrastructure group as of November 2011. Prior to joining KKR as an employee, Ms. Farley co-founded RPM Energy LLC (a privately-owned oil and gas exploration and development company) created in September 2010 and partnered with KKR. She was an Advisory Director of Jefferies Randall & Dewey (a private global oil and gas energy industry advisor) from August 2008 to September 2010 and was Co-President of Jefferies Randall & Dewey from February 2005 to August 2008. She was a Managing Partner of Castex Energy Partners (a private exploration and production limited partnership) from August 2008 to January 2009.
Mr. Fowler has been Chairman of Spectra Energy Partners, LP (a public entity) since October 2008. He was President & Chief Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Corp. (a natural gas gathering, processing and mainline transportation company) from December 2006 to December 2008 and served as a director from December 2006 to May 2009.
Ms. Nimocks was a director (senior partner) with McKinsey & Company (a private global management consulting firm) from June 1999 to March 2010 and was with the firm in various other capacities since 1989, including as a leader in the firms Global Petroleum Practice, Electric Power & Natural Gas Practice, Organization Practice, and Risk Management Practice, as a member of the firms worldwide personnel committees for many years and as the Houston Office Manager for eight years.
Ms. Peverett was President and Chief Executive Officer of BC Transmission Corporation (BCTC) (electrical transmission) from April 2005 to January 2009.
Mr. Waterman has been Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Development & Investment Officer of Agrium Inc. (a public agricultural supply company) since April 2011. From April 2000 through April 2011 he was Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer of Agrium Inc.
Mr. Hopwood was Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Suncor Energy Inc. (a public oil and gas company) from 2002 to February 2011.
All of the directors and executive officers of Encana listed above, as a group, beneficially owned or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, as of February 16, 2012, an aggregate of 648,885 common shares representing 0.09 percent of the issued and outstanding voting shares of Encana, and held options to acquire an aggregate of 4,199,024 additional common shares.
Investors should be aware that some of the directors and officers of the Company are directors and officers of other private and public companies. Some of these private and public companies may, from time to time, be involved in business transactions or banking relationships which may create situations in which conflicts might arise. Any such conflicts shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the relevant provisions of the CBCA, including the duty of such directors and officers to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The full text of the Audit Committee mandate is included in Appendix E of this annual information form.
Composition of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee consists of five members, all of whom are independent and financially literate in accordance with the definitions in National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees. The relevant education and experience of each Audit Committee member is outlined below.
Barry W. Harrison
Mr. Harrison holds a Bachelor of Business Administration and Banking (Colorado College) and a Bachelor of Laws (University of British Columbia). He is a Corporate Director and an independent businessman. Mr. Harrison was Chairman and a director of The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company (a Canadian property and casualty insurer) and its related companies, The Wawanesa Life Insurance Company and its U.S. subsidiary, Wawanesa General Insurance Company, from May 1994 to May 2011. In the past ten years, he has served as either the Chairman, director or President of several intermediate and junior oil & gas companies doing business in Canada, the United States and Russia. Mr. Harrison is also a director and President of Yokara Management Inc. (a private investment company).
Suzanne P. Nimocks
Ms. Nimocks holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics (Tufts University) and a Masters in Business Administration (Harvard Graduate School of Business). She is a Corporate Director. Ms. Nimocks is a director of Rowan Companies, Inc. (a public international contract drilling services company) and ArcelorMittal (a public international steel company). She was a director (senior partner) with McKinsey & Company (a private global management consulting firm) from June 1999 to March 2010 and was with the firm in various other capacities since 1989, including as a leader in the firms Global Petroleum Practice, Electric Power & Natural Gas Practice, Organization Practice, and Risk Management Practice, as a member of the firms worldwide personnel committees for many years and as the Houston Office Manager for eight years.
Jane L. Peverett (Audit Committee Chair)
Ms. Peverett holds a Bachelor of Commerce (McMaster University) and a Master of Business Administration (Queens University), together with a designation as a Certified Management Accountant and a Canadian Security Analyst Certificate. She is also a Fellow of The Society of Management Accountants (FCMA). Ms. Peverett is a Corporate Director. She is a director of Northwest Natural Gas Company (a public natural gas distribution company), Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (one of Canadas largest banks), the B.C. Ferry Authority and Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited (a private mutual insurance company). She is also an Audit Committee member of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Northwest Natural Gas Company. She was President and Chief Executive Officer of BCTC (electrical transmission) from April 2005 to January 2009 and was previously Vice President, Corporate Services and Chief Financial Officer of BCTC from June 2003 to April 2005. In her 15-year career with the Westcoast Energy Inc./Duke Energy Corporation group of companies, she held senior executive positions with Union Gas Limited (Ontario), including President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President Sales & Marketing and Chief Financial Officer, among others.
Allan P. Sawin
Mr. Sawin holds a Bachelor of Commerce (University of Alberta) and a designation as a Chartered Accountant. He is also a Fellow of the Chartered Accountants (FCA). He is President of Bear Investments Inc. (a private investment company). From 1990 until their sale to CCS Income Trust in May 2006, Mr. Sawin was President, director and part owner of Grizzly Well Servicing Inc. and related companies (private oilfield service companies). From 1995 to 2003, he also served as a director and member of the Audit Committee of NQL Drilling Tools Inc. while it was a public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Bruce G. Waterman
Mr. Waterman holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Queens University) and a designation as a Chartered Accountant. He is also a Fellow of the Chartered Accountants (FCA). He has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Development & Investment Officer of Agrium Inc. (a public agricultural supply company) since April 2011. From April 2000 through April 2011, he was Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer of Agrium. Prior to joining Agrium, Mr. Waterman was the Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of Talisman Energy Inc. (a public oil and gas company) from January 1996 to April 2000. Mr. Waterman also has extensive expertise in oil and gas exploration and production operations, having spent 15 years (1981 to 1996) at Amoco Corporation, including Dome Petroleum Limited, a predecessor company. At Amoco (a global chemical, oil and gas company which merged with British Petroleum in 1998), his roles included various positions in finance and accounting.
The above list does not include David P. OBrien who is an ex officio member of the Audit Committee.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Encana has adopted policies and procedures with respect to the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has established a budget for the provision of a specified list of audit and permitted non-audit services that the Audit Committee believes to be typical, recurring or otherwise likely to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The budget generally covers the period between the adoption of the budget and the next meeting of the Audit Committee, but at the option of the Audit Committee it may cover a longer or shorter period. The list of services is sufficiently detailed as to the particular services to be provided to ensure that (i) the Audit Committee knows what services it is being asked to pre-approve; and (ii) it is not necessary for any member of management to make a judgment as to whether a proposed service fits within the pre-approved services.
Subject to the next paragraph, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee (or if the Chair is unavailable, any other member of the Committee) to pre-approve the provision of permitted services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP which have not otherwise been pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including the fees and terms of the proposed services (Delegated Authority). All pre-approvals granted pursuant to Delegated Authority must be presented by the member(s) who granted the pre-approvals to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting. The fees payable in connection with any particular service to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that has been pre-approved pursuant to Delegated Authority (i) may not exceed C$200,000, in the case of pre-approvals granted by the Chair of the Audit Committee; and (ii) may not exceed C$50,000, in the case of pre-approvals granted by any other member of the Audit Committee.
All proposed services, or the fees payable in connection with such services, that have not already been pre-approved must be pre-approved by either the Audit Committee or pursuant to Delegated Authority. Prohibited services may not be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or pursuant to Delegated Authority.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
External Auditor Service Fees
The following table provides information about the fees billed to the Company for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during fiscal 2011 and 2010.
(C$ thousands) |
2011 |
2010 |
Audit Fees (1)
|
3,136 |
3,243 |
Audit-Related Fees (2)
|
896 |
252 |
Tax Fees (3)
|
457 |
600 |
All Other Fees (4)
|
4 |
15 |
Total
|
4,493 |
4,110 |
Notes:
|
(1) |
Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
|
(2) |
Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Companys financial statements and are not reported as Audit Fees. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the services provided in this category included reviews in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, research of accounting and audit-related issues, review of reserves disclosure and the review of the Corporate Responsibility Report. |
|
(3) |
Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance services, tax advice and tax planning. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the services provided in this category included assistance and advice in relation to the preparation of corporate income tax returns. |
|
(4) |
During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the services provided in this category included the payment of maintenance fees associated with a research tool that grants access to a comprehensive library of financial reporting and assurance literature and a working paper documentation package used by the Companys internal audit group. |
Encana did not rely on the de minimus exemption provided by Section (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X in 2011 or 2010.
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, an unlimited number of first preferred shares and an unlimited number of second preferred shares. As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 736.3 million common shares outstanding and no preferred shares outstanding.
Common Shares
The holders of the common shares are entitled to receive dividends if, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of the Company. The holders of the common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of shareholders and are entitled to one vote per common share held at all such meetings. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company or other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs, the holders of the common shares will be entitled to participate rateably in any distribution of the assets of the Company.
Encana has stock-based compensation plans that allow employees to purchase common shares of the Company. Option exercise prices approximate the market price for the common shares on the date that the options were issued. Options granted under the plans are generally fully exercisable after three years and expire five years after the grant date.
The November 30, 2009 Split Transaction was effected by way of an arrangement under the CBCA, under which the holders of common shares of Encana received one new Encana common share and one common share of Cenovus for each Encana common share previously held. Holders of the stock options of Encana became the holders of stock options of Encana and Cenovus, with the exercise price under the stock options being adjusted based on the relative trading prices of the Encana and Cenovus common shares.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The Company has a shareholder rights plan (the Plan) that was adopted to ensure, to the extent possible, that all shareholders of the Company are treated fairly in connection with any take-over bid for the Company. The Plan creates a right that attaches to each present and subsequently issued common share. Until the separation time, which typically occurs at the time of an unsolicited take-over bid, whereby a person acquires or attempts to acquire 20 percent or more of Encanas common shares, the rights are not separable from the common shares, are not exercisable and no separate rights certificates are issued. Each right entitles the holder, other than the 20 percent acquirer, from and after the separation time and before certain expiration times, to acquire one common share at 50 percent of the market price at the time of exercise. The Plan was amended and reconfirmed at the 2010 annual and special meeting of shareholders and must be reconfirmed at every third annual meeting thereafter.
Preferred Shares
Preferred shares may be issued in one or more series. The Board of Directors may determine the designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to each series of preferred shares before the issue of such series. Holders of the preferred shares are not entitled to vote at any meeting of the shareholders of the Company, but may be entitled to vote if the Company fails to pay dividends on that series of preferred shares. The first preferred shares are entitled to priority over the second preferred shares and the common shares of the Company, and the second preferred shares are entitled to priority over the common shares of the Company, with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Companys affairs.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The following information relating to Encanas credit ratings is provided as it relates to Encanas financing costs and liquidity. Specifically, credit ratings affect Encanas ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing and the cost of such financing. Additionally, the ability of Encana to engage in certain collateralized business activities on a cost effective basis depends on the Company maintaining competitive credit ratings. A reduction in the current ratings on the Companys debt by its rating agencies, particularly a downgrade below investment grade ratings, could adversely affect the Companys cost of financing and its access to sources of liquidity and capital. In addition, changes in credit ratings may affect the Companys ability to, and the associated costs of, entering into normal course derivative or hedging transactions.
The following table outlines the ratings issued by the respective rating agencies as of February 16, 2011.
|
|
Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P) |
|
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) |
|
DBRS Limited (DBRS) |
Long-Term - Senior Unsecured |
|
BBB |
|
Baa2 |
|
A (low) |
Short-Term - Commercial Paper |
|
A-2 |
|
P-2 |
|
R-1 (low) |
Outlook/Trend |
|
Stable |
|
Stable |
|
Negative |
Credit ratings are intended to provide investors with an independent measure of credit quality of any issue of securities. The credit ratings assigned by the rating agencies are not recommendations to purchase, hold or sell the securities nor do the ratings comment on market price or suitability for a particular investor. Any rating may not remain in effect for any given period of time or may be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant.
S&Ps long-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from AAA to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. A rating of BBB by S&P is within the fourth highest of ten categories and indicates that the obligation exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. S&Ps short-term Canadian commercial paper ratings are on a scale that ranges from A-1 (high) to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. A rating of A-2 is the fourth highest of eight categories and indicates that the issuer has satisfactory capacity to meet its financial commitments.
Moodys long-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from Aaa to C, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. A rating of Baa2 by Moodys is within the fourth highest of nine categories and is assigned to obligations subject to moderate credit risk. They are considered medium grade and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics. The addition of a 1, 2 or 3 modifier after a rating indicates the relative standing within a particular rating category. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its rating category, the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of its rating category. Moodys short-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from P-1 to NP, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. A rating of P-2 is the second highest of four categories and indicates that the issuer has a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations.
DBRS long-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from AAA to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. A rating of A (low) by DBRS is within the third highest of ten categories and is assigned to obligations considered to be of good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than that of higher rated entities. The addition of a high or low modifier after a rating indicates relative standing within the category. DBRS commercial paper and short-term debt credit ratings are on a scale ranging from R-1 (high) to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. A rating of R-1 (low) is the third highest of ten categories and indicates that the short-term debt is of good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is substantial, but overall strength is not as favourable as higher rating categories. The issuer may be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable. The trend indicates the direction that the ratings are headed should present tendencies continue.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
See Risk Factors A downgrade in Encanas credit rating could increase its cost of capital and limit its access to capital, suppliers or counterparties in this annual information form.
All of the outstanding common shares of Encana are listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ECA. The following table outlines the share price trading range and volume of shares traded by month in 2011.
|
|
Toronto Stock Exchange |
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Share Price Trading Range |
|
Share |
|
|
Share Price Trading Range |
|
Share |
| ||||||||
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Close |
|
Volume |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Close |
|
Volume |
|
|
|
(C$ per share) |
|
(millions) |
|
|
($ per share) |
|
(millions) |
| ||||||||
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
32.59 |
|
28.39 |
|
32.27 |
|
57.9 |
|
|
32.67 |
|
28.52 |
|
32.27 |
|
96.9 |
|
February
|
|
33.00 |
|
30.28 |
|
31.58 |
|
59.0 |
|
|
33.17 |
|
30.65 |
|
32.54 |
|
94.4 |
|
March
|
|
34.25 |
|
29.42 |
|
33.53 |
|
59.4 |
|
|
35.06 |
|
30.12 |
|
34.53 |
|
94.2 |
|
April
|
|
33.99 |
|
30.44 |
|
31.79 |
|
42.9 |
|
|
35.22 |
|
31.87 |
|
33.53 |
|
65.3 |
|
May
|
|
33.68 |
|
30.71 |
|
33.02 |
|
36.0 |
|
|
34.85 |
|
31.78 |
|
34.10 |
|
85.2 |
|
June
|
|
33.30 |
|
28.13 |
|
29.78 |
|
51.2 |
|
|
34.33 |
|
28.67 |
|
30.79 |
|
91.1 |
|
July
|
|
30.42 |
|
27.96 |
|
28.03 |
|
35.0 |
|
|
32.23 |
|
29.27 |
|
29.29 |
|
69.4 |
|
August
|
|
28.04 |
|
22.92 |
|
24.87 |
|
61.3 |
|
|
29.89 |
|
23.09 |
|
25.41 |
|
134.4 |
|
September
|
|
25.14 |
|
19.86 |
|
20.17 |
|
56.2 |
|
|
25.75 |
|
18.99 |
|
19.21 |
|
96.2 |
|
October
|
|
22.32 |
|
18.71 |
|
21.62 |
|
51.7 |
|
|
22.51 |
|
17.64 |
|
21.70 |
|
103.9 |
|
November
|
|
21.81 |
|
18.62 |
|
20.55 |
|
49.6 |
|
|
21.59 |
|
17.76 |
|
20.05 |
|
94.6 |
|
December
|
|
20.89 |
|
18.40 |
|
18.89 |
|
43.6 |
|
|
20.62 |
|
17.75 |
|
18.53 |
|
101.5 |
|
During 2011, 2010 and 2009, Encana had approval from the TSX to purchase common shares under a Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB). The Company did not purchase any of its common shares under its NCIB program during 2011. During 2010, the Company purchased approximately 15.4 million common shares at an average price of approximately $32.42 per share for total consideration of approximately $499 million. During 2009, the Company did not purchase any of its common shares. Encana has not renewed its NCIB program, which expired on December 13, 2011.
On November 14, 2011, Encana completed a public offering in the U.S. of $600 million in senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 3.90 percent due November 15, 2021 and $400 million in senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 5.15 percent due November 15, 2041.
The declaration of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is approved quarterly. During 2011 and 2010, Encana paid a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share (2011 - $0.80 per share annually; 2010 - $0.80 per share annually). For the first three quarters of 2009, Encana paid a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Following the Split Transaction, in the fourth quarter of 2009, Encana paid a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share (2009 - $1.40 per share annually).
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The Company is involved in various claims and litigation arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters is uncertain and there can be no assurance that such matters will be resolved in Encanas favour, the Company does not currently believe that the outcome of any pending or threatened proceedings related to these or other matters, or the amounts which the Company may be required to pay by reason thereof, would have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
If any event arising from the risk factors set forth below occurs, Encanas business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows and in some cases its reputation could be materially adversely affected. When assessing the materiality of the foregoing risk factors, Encana takes into account a number of qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to, financial, operational, reputational and regulatory aspects of the identified risk factor.
A substantial or extended decline in natural gas or liquids prices could have a material adverse effect on Encana.
Encanas financial performance and condition are substantially dependent on the prevailing prices of natural gas and liquids. Fluctuations in natural gas or liquids prices could have an adverse effect on the Companys operations and financial condition and the value and amount of its reserves. Prices for natural gas and liquids fluctuate in response to changes in the supply and demand for natural gas and oil, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors beyond the Companys control.
Natural gas prices realized by Encana are affected primarily by North American supply and demand, weather conditions and by prices of alternate sources of energy (including refined product, coal, imported liquefied natural gas and renewable energy initiatives). A substantial or extended decline in the price of natural gas could result in a delay or cancellation of existing or future drilling, development or construction programs or curtailment in production at some properties or could result in unutilized long-term transportation and drilling commitments, all of which could have an adverse effect on the Companys revenues, profitability and cash flows.
Oil prices are determined by international supply and demand. Factors which affect oil prices include the actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, world economic conditions, government regulation, political stability in the Middle East and elsewhere, the foreign supply of oil, the price of foreign imports, the availability of alternate fuel sources and weather conditions. Historically, NGL prices have generally been correlated with oil prices, although they are determined based on supply and demand in international and domestic NGL markets.
On at least an annual basis, Encana conducts an assessment of the carrying value of its assets in accordance with applicable accounting standards. If natural gas or liquids prices decline, the carrying value of Encanas assets could be subject to financial downward revisions, and the Companys net earnings could be adversely affected.
Encanas ability to operate and complete projects is dependent on factors outside of its control.
The Companys ability to operate, generate sufficient cash flows, and complete projects depends upon numerous factors beyond the Companys control. In addition to commodity prices and continued market demand for its products, these non-controllable factors include general business and market conditions, economic recessions and financial market turmoil, the overall state of the capital markets, including investor appetite for investments in the oil and gas industry generally and the Companys securities in particular, the ability to secure and maintain cost effective financing for its commitments, legislative, environmental and regulatory matters, unexpected cost increases, royalties, taxes, volatility in natural gas and liquids prices, the availability of drilling and other equipment, the ability to access lands, the ability to access water for hydraulic fracturing operations, weather, the availability of processing capacity, the availability and proximity of pipeline capacity, technology failures, accidents, the availability of skilled labour, and reservoir quality.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The tentative recovery from the global recession is creating ongoing fiscal challenges for the world economy. These conditions impact Encanas customers and suppliers and may alter the Companys spending and operating plans. There may be unexpected business impacts from this market uncertainty, including volatile changes in currency exchange rates, inflation, interest rates, and general levels of investing and consuming activity, as well as potential impact on the Companys credit ratings, which could affect its liquidity and ability to obtain financing.
The Company undertakes a variety of projects including exploration and development projects and the construction or expansion of facilities and pipelines. Project delays may delay expected revenues and project cost overruns could make projects uneconomic.
All of Encanas operations are subject to regulation and intervention by governments that can affect or prohibit the drilling, completion and tie-in of wells, production, the construction or expansion of facilities and the operation and abandonment of fields. Contract rights can be cancelled or expropriated. Changes to government regulation could impact the Companys existing and planned projects.
The Companys business is subject to environmental legislation in all jurisdictions in which it operates and any changes in such legislation could negatively affect its results of operations.
All phases of the natural gas and liquids businesses are subject to environmental regulation pursuant to a variety of Canadian, U.S. and other federal, provincial, territorial, state and municipal laws and regulations (collectively, environmental legislation).
Environmental legislation imposes, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the use, generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of chemicals, hazardous substances and waste associated with the finding, production, transmission and storage of the Companys products including the hydraulic fracturing of wells, the decommissioning of facilities and in connection with spills, releases and emissions of various substances to the environment. It also imposes restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the management of fresh or potable water sources that are being used, or whose use is contemplated, in connection with natural gas and oil operations.
Environmental legislation also requires that wells, facility sites and other properties associated with Encanas operations be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. In addition, certain types of operations, including exploration and development projects and changes to certain existing projects, may require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments or permit applications. Compliance with environmental legislation can require significant expenditures, including expenditures for clean up costs and damages arising out of contaminated properties and failure to comply with environmental legislation may result in the imposition of fines and penalties.
Although it is not expected that the costs of complying with environmental legislation will have a material adverse effect on Encanas financial condition or results of operations, no assurance can be made that the costs of complying with environmental legislation in the future will not have such an effect.
A number of federal, provincial and state governments have announced intentions to regulate greenhouse gases and certain air pollutants. These governments are currently developing the regulatory and policy frameworks to deliver on their announcements. In most cases there are few technical details regarding the implementation and coordination of these plans to regulate emissions. However, the Canadian federal government has gone on record as saying that it will align greenhouse gas emission legislation with the U.S. As it remains unclear what approach the U.S. federal government will take, or when, it is also unclear whether these federal governments will implement economy-wide greenhouse gas emission legislation or a sector-specific approach, and what type of compliance mechanisms will be available to certain emitters. Currently, certain provinces and states, including Alberta and British Columbia, have implemented greenhouse gas emission legislation that impacts areas in which the Company operates. It is anticipated that other federal, provincial and state announcements and regulatory frameworks to address emissions will continue to emerge.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Additionally, the U.S. and Canadian federal governments and certain U.S. state and Canadian provincial governments are currently reviewing certain aspects of the scientific, regulatory and policy framework under which hydraulic fracturing operations are conducted. At present, most of these governments are primarily engaged in the collection, review and assessment of technical information regarding the hydraulic fracturing process and, with the exception of increased chemical disclosure requirements in many of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, have not provided specific details with respect to any significant actual, proposed or contemplated changes to the hydraulic fracturing regulatory construct. However, certain environmental and other groups have suggested that additional federal, provincial, territorial, state and municipal laws and regulations may be needed to more closely regulate the hydraulic fracturing process, and have made claims that hydraulic fracturing techniques are harmful to surface water and drinking water sources. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) has commenced a study of the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing, including the impacts on drinking water sources and public health. The EPA has also released a draft report outlining the results of its groundwater study at the Companys Pavillion natural gas field of Wyoming. Although the EPAs draft report has not been subject to a qualified, third-party, scientific verification, any implication of a potential connection between hydraulic fracturing and groundwater quality may have a material adverse effect on Encanas business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation.
Further, certain governments in jurisdictions where the Company does not currently operate have considered a temporary moratorium on hydraulic fracturing until further studies can be completed and some governments have adopted, and others have considered adopting, regulations that could impose more stringent permitting, disclosure and well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations. Any new laws, regulations or permitting requirements regarding hydraulic fracturing could lead to operational delay, increased operating costs or third-party or governmental claims, and could increase the Companys cost of compliance and doing business as well as reduce the amount of natural gas that the Company is ultimately able to produce from its reserves.
As these federal and regional programs are under development, Encana is unable to predict the total impact of the potential regulations upon its business. Therefore, it is possible that the Company could face increases in operating costs in order to comply with legislation governing emissions and hydraulic fracturing.
If Encana fails to acquire or find additional reserves, the Companys reserves and production will decline materially from their current levels.
Encanas future natural gas, oil and NGL reserves and production, and therefore its cash flows, are highly dependent upon its success in exploiting its current reserves base and acquiring, discovering or developing additional reserves. Without reserves additions through exploration, acquisition or development activities, the Companys reserves and production will decline over time as reserves are depleted.
The business of exploring for, developing or acquiring reserves is capital intensive. To the extent cash flows from operations are insufficient and external sources of capital become limited, Encanas ability to make the necessary capital investments to maintain and expand its natural gas, oil and NGL reserves will be impaired. In addition, there can be no certainty that Encana will be able to find and develop or acquire additional reserves to replace production at acceptable costs.
Encanas reserves data and future net revenue estimates are uncertain.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of natural gas, oil and NGL reserves, including many factors beyond the Companys control. The reserves data in this annual information form represents estimates only. In general, estimates of economically recoverable natural gas, oil and NGL reserves and the future net cash flows therefrom are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as product prices, future operating and capital costs, availability of future capital, historical production from the properties and the assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies, including with respect to royalty payments, all of which may vary considerably from actual results. All such estimates are to some degree uncertain, and classifications of reserves are only attempts to define the degree of uncertainty involved.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
For those reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable natural gas, oil and NGL reserves attributable to any particular group of properties, classification of such reserves based on risk of recovery and estimates of future net revenues expected therefrom, prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers at different times, may vary substantially. Encanas actual production, revenues, taxes and development and operating expenditures with respect to its reserves may vary from such estimates, and such variances could be material.
Estimates with respect to reserves that may be developed and produced in the future are often based upon volumetric calculations and upon analogy to similar types of reserves, rather than upon actual production history. Estimates based on these methods generally are less reliable than those based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history will result in variations, which may be material, in the estimated reserves.
Encanas hedging activities could result in realized and unrealized losses.
The nature of the Companys operations results in exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices. The Company monitors its exposure to such fluctuations and, where the Company deems it appropriate, utilizes derivative financial instruments and physical delivery contracts to mitigate the potential impact of declines in natural gas and liquids prices.
Under IFRS, derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges for accounting purposes, or are not designated as hedges, are fair valued with the resulting changes recognized in current period net earnings. The utilization of derivative financial instruments may therefore introduce significant volatility into the Companys reported net earnings.
The terms of the Companys various hedging agreements may limit the benefit to the Company of commodity price increases. The Company may also suffer financial loss because of hedging arrangements if the Company is unable to produce natural gas, oil or NGLs to fulfill delivery obligations, or if counterparties to the Companys hedging agreements fail to fulfill their obligations under the hedging agreements.
Encanas operations are subject to the risk of business interruption and casualty losses.
The Companys business is subject to all of the operating risks normally associated with the exploration for, development of and production of natural gas, oil and NGLs and the operation of midstream facilities. These risks include blowouts, explosions, fire, gaseous leaks, migration of harmful substances and liquid spills, acts of vandalism and terrorism, any of which could cause personal injury, result in damage to, or destruction of, natural gas and oil wells or formations or production facilities and other property, equipment and the environment, as well as interrupt operations.
In addition, all of Encanas operations will be subject to all of the risks normally incident to the transportation, processing, storing and marketing of natural gas, oil, NGLs and other related products, drilling and completion of natural gas and oil wells, and the operation and development of natural gas and oil properties, including encountering unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoir pressure or productivity, blowouts, equipment failures and other accidents, sour gas releases, uncontrollable flows of natural gas, oil or well fluids, adverse weather conditions, pollution and other environmental risks.
The occurrence of a significant event against which Encana is not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could affect expenses or result in realized and unrealized losses.
Worldwide prices for natural gas and oil are set in U.S. dollars. However, many of the Companys expenses outside of the U.S. are denominated in Canadian dollars. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar could impact the Companys expenses and have an adverse effect on the Companys financial performance and condition.
In addition, the Company has significant U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar could result in realized and unrealized losses on U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Encana does not operate all of its properties and assets.
Other companies operate a portion of the assets in which Encana has ownership interests. Encana will have limited ability to exercise influence over operations of these assets or their associated costs. Encanas dependence on the operator and other working interest owners for these properties and assets, and its limited ability to influence operations and associated costs could materially adversely affect the Companys financial performance. The success and timing of Encanas activities on assets operated by others therefore will depend upon a number of factors that are outside of the Companys control, including timing and amount of capital expenditures, timing and amount of operating and maintenance expenditures, the operators expertise and financial resources, approval of other participants, selection of technology, and risk management practices.
Encana is exposed to counterparty risk.
Encana is exposed to the risks associated with counterparty performance including credit risk and performance risk. Encana may experience material financial losses in the event of customer payment default for commodity sales and financial derivative transactions. Encana may be impacted by partner defaults with respect to the funding of partner obligations for capital projects. Performance risk can impact Encanas operations by the non-delivery of contracted products or services by counterparties, which could impact project timelines or operational efficiency.
A downgrade in Encanas credit rating could increase its cost of capital and limit its access to capital, suppliers or counterparties.
Rating agencies regularly evaluate the Company, basing their ratings of its long-term and short-term debt on a number of factors. This includes the Companys financial strength as well as factors not entirely within its control, including conditions affecting the oil and gas industry generally and the wider state of the economy. There can be no assurance that one or more of the Companys credit ratings will not be downgraded.
The Companys borrowing costs and ability to raise funds are directly impacted by its credit ratings. Credit ratings may be important to suppliers or counterparties when they seek to engage in certain transactions, including transactions involving over-the-counter derivatives. A credit-rating downgrade could potentially impair the Companys ability to enter into arrangements with suppliers or counterparties, to engage in certain transactions, and could limit the Companys access to private and public credit markets and increase the costs of borrowing under its existing credit facilities. A downgrade could also limit the Companys access to short-term debt markets, increase the cost of borrowing in the short-term and long-term debt markets, and trigger collateralization requirements related to physical and financial derivative liabilities with certain marketing counterparties, facility construction contracts, and pipeline and midstream service providers.
In connection with certain over-the-counter derivatives contracts and other trading agreements, the Company could be required to provide additional collateral or to terminate transactions with certain counterparties in the event of a downgrade of its credit rating. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could adversely affect the Companys ability to execute portions of its business strategy, including hedging, and could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and capital position.
Encana has certain indemnification obligations to Cenovus Energy Inc.
In relation to the Split Transaction, Encana and Cenovus have each agreed to indemnify the other for certain liabilities and obligations associated with, among other things, in the case of Encanas indemnity, the business and assets retained by Encana, and in the case of Cenovuss indemnity, the business and assets transferred to Cenovus.
Encana cannot determine whether it will be required to indemnify Cenovus for any substantial obligations. Encana also cannot be assured that, if Cenovus is required to indemnify Encana and its affiliates for any substantial obligations, Cenovus will be able to satisfy such obligations. Any indemnification claim against Encana pursuant to the provisions of the Split Transaction agreements could have a material adverse effect upon Encana.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The decision to pay dividends and the amount of such dividends is subject to the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors based on numerous factors and may vary from time to time.
Although the Company currently intends to pay quarterly cash dividends to its shareholders, these cash dividends may be reduced or suspended. The amount of cash available to the Company to pay dividends, if any, can vary significantly from period to period for a number of reasons, including, among other things: Encanas operational and financial performance; fluctuations in the costs to produce natural gas, oil and NGLs; the amount of cash required or retained for debt service or repayment; amounts required to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements; access to equity markets; foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates; and the risk factors set forth in this annual information form.
The decision whether or not to pay dividends and the amount of any such dividends are subject to the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors, which regularly evaluates the Companys proposed dividend payments and the solvency test requirements of the CBCA. In addition, the level of dividends per common share will be affected by the number of outstanding common shares and other securities that may be entitled to receive cash dividends or other payments. Dividends may be increased, reduced or suspended depending on the Companys operational success and the performance of its assets. The market value of the common shares may deteriorate if the Company is unable to meet dividend expectations in the future, and that deterioration may be material.
The Companys foreign operations will expose it to risks from abroad which could negatively affect its results of operations.
Some of Encanas operations and related assets may be located, from time to time, in countries outside North America, some of which may be considered to be politically and economically unstable. Exploration or development activities in such countries may require protracted negotiations with host governments, national oil companies and third parties and are frequently subject to economic and political considerations, such as taxation, nationalization, expropriation, inflation, currency fluctuations, increased regulation and approval requirements, governmental regulation and the risk of actions by terrorist or insurgent groups, any of which could adversely affect the economics of exploration or development projects.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
The registrar and transfer agent for the Companys common shares is CIBC Mellon Trust Company:
In Canada: Canadian Stock Transfer Company P.O. Box 700, Station B Montreal, Quebec H3B 3K3
|
In the United States: Computershare 480 Washington Blvd. Jersey City, New Jersey United States of America 07310 |
Canadian Stock Transfer Company Inc. acts as the administrative agent for CIBC Mellon Trust Company.
In order to respond to Encana shareholder inquiries, the Companys transfer agent has set-up a dedicated answer line. Shareholder inquiries should be directed to the following:
· Shareholders residing in Canada or the United States, please call 1-866-580-7145
· Shareholders residing outside of North America, please call 1-416-682-3863
Shareholders can also send requests via the transfer agents web site at www.canstockta.com/investorinquiry.
The Companys independent auditors are PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, who have issued an independent auditors report dated February 23, 2012 in respect of the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010 and for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2011, and the Companys effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has advised that they are independent with respect to the Company within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta and the rules of the SEC.
Information relating to reserves in this annual information form was calculated by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd., Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and DeGolyer and MacNaughton, each of which is an independent qualified reserves evaluator.
The principals of each of GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd., Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and DeGolyer and MacNaughton, in each case, as a group own beneficially, directly or indirectly, less than one percent of any class of Encanas securities.
Additional information relating to Encana is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Additional information, including directors and officers remuneration, principal holders of Encanas securities, and options to purchase securities, is contained in the Information Circular for Encanas most recent annual meeting of shareholders that involved the election of directors. Additional financial information is contained in Encanas audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The Arrangement Agreement and Separation and Transition Agreement, described under General Development of the Business Recent Developments - 2009 are material contracts of Encana and are available on SEDAR.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
This annual information form contains certain forward-looking statements or information (collectively referred to in this note as forward-looking statements) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as projected, anticipate, believe, expect, plan, intend or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Forward-looking statements in this annual information form include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: achieving its strategy of growing its portfolio of resource plays producing natural gas, oil and NGLs, completion of transaction agreements with Mitsubishi, including potential terms, closing date, amount of investments, funding commitment and development of otherwise undeveloped natural gas properties, anticipated date of first production at Deep Panuke gas field, drilling and development plans and the timing and location thereof, production and processing capacities, including deep cut processing agreements that will capture more value and enhance returns, and levels and the timing of achieving such capacities and levels, potential completion of divestitures of certain assets or other transactions, attaining capital and operating efficiencies, funding future development costs with joint ventures, expanding natural gas markets in North America, 2012 production estimates, expansion of gathering and processing plants and other facilities, reserves estimates, including reserves estimates under different price cases, and net present values of future net revenues for reserves using forecast prices and costs and SEC constant prices, the level of expenditures for compliance with environmental legislation and regulations, including estimates of potential costs of carbon, operating costs, site restoration costs including abandonment and reclamation costs, maintaining satisfactory credit ratings, pending litigation, exploration plans, acquisition and divestiture plans and net cash flows.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations upon which they are based will occur. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not occur, which may cause the Companys actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any estimates or projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These assumptions, risks and uncertainties include, among other things: volatility of, and assumptions regarding natural gas and liquids prices, including substantial or extended decline of the same; assumptions based upon the Companys current guidance; fluctuations in currency and interest rates; risk that the Company may not conclude divestitures of certain assets or other transactions (including third-party capital investments, farm-outs or partnerships, which Encana may refer to from time to time as joint ventures) as a result of various conditions not being met; product supply and demand; market competition; risks inherent in the Companys and its subsidiaries marketing operations, including credit risks; imprecision of reserves estimates and estimates of recoverable quantities of natural gas and liquids from resource plays and other sources not currently classified as proved, probable or possible reserves or economic contingent resources, including future net revenue estimates; marketing margins; potential disruption or unexpected technical difficulties in developing new facilities; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing or modifying processing facilities; risks associated with technology; the Companys ability to acquire or find additional reserves; hedging activities resulting in realized and unrealized losses; business interruption and casualty losses; risk of the Company not operating all of its properties and assets; counterparty risk; downgrade in credit rating and its adverse effects; liability for indemnification obligations to third parties; variability of dividends to be paid; its ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet its current and future obligations; its ability to access external sources of debt and equity capital; the timing and the costs of well and pipeline construction; the Companys ability to secure adequate product transportation; changes in royalty, tax, environmental, greenhouse gas, carbon, accounting and other laws or regulations or the interpretations of such laws or regulations; political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates; terrorist threats; risks associated with existing and potential future lawsuits and regulatory actions made against the Company; and other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in the reports and filings made with securities regulatory authorities by Encana. Although Encana believes that the expectations represented by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. In addition, assumptions relating to such forward-looking statements generally include Encanas current expectations and projections made in light of, and generally consistent with, its historical experience and its perception of historical trends, including the conversion of resources into reserves and production as well as expectations regarding rates of advancement and innovation, generally consistent with and informed by its past experience, all of which are subject to the risk factors identified elsewhere in this annual information form.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Assumptions with respect to forward-looking information regarding expanding Encanas oil and NGL production and extraction volumes are based on existing expansion of natural gas processing facilities in areas where Encana operates and the continued expansion and development of oil and NGL production from existing properties within its asset portfolio.
Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this annual information form are made as of the date hereof and, except as required by law, Encana undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The forward-looking statements contained in this annual information form are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
National Instrument 51-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators imposes oil and gas disclosure standards for Canadian public companies engaged in oil and gas activities. Prior to 2011, Encana relied upon an exemption from NI 51-101 granted by Canadian securities regulatory authorities to permit it to provide disclosure relating to reserves and other oil and gas information in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements. Subsequent to the expiry of that exemption, Encana has provided and continues to provide disclosure which complies with the annual disclosure requirements of NI 51-101 in its annual information form. The Canadian protocol disclosure is contained in Appendix A and under Narrative Description of the Business. Encana has obtained an exemption dated January 4, 2011 from certain requirements of NI 51-101 to permit it to provide certain disclosure prepared in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements, in addition to the Canadian protocol disclosure. That disclosure is primarily set forth in Appendix D.
See Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information in this annual information form for a description of the primary differences between the disclosure requirements under the Canadian standards and the disclosure requirements under the U.S. standards.
All production information contained in the narrative portions of this annual information form is on a net basis (after royalties), unless otherwise indicated.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
In this Appendix, Encana provides disclosure of its reserves and oil and gas information in accordance with the requirements of NI 51-101. See Note Regarding Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information. The reserves and other oil and gas information set forth below has an effective date of December 31, 2011 and was prepared as of February 15, 2012.
Since inception, Encana has retained IQREs to evaluate and prepare reports on 100 percent of Encanas natural gas, oil and NGL reserves annually. For further information regarding the reserves process, see Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information in this annual information form.
The reserves data summarizes the estimated natural gas, oil and NGL reserves of Encana and the net present values of future net revenues for these reserves using forecast prices and costs, as evaluated by Encanas IQREs. The evaluations were prepared in accordance with procedures and standards contained in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation (COGE) handbook. The reserves definitions used are those contained in the COGE handbook and NI 51-101.
The results of the evaluations are summarized in the tables that follow in this Appendix. All evaluations of future net revenue are after the deduction of future income tax expenses (unless otherwise noted), royalties, development costs, production costs and well abandonment costs, but before the consideration of indirect costs such as general and administrative expenses and certain abandonment and reclamation costs. The estimated future net revenue does not necessarily represent the fair market value of Encanas reserves. There is no assurance that the forecast price and cost assumptions used in preparing the evaluations will be attained and variances could be material. The reserves estimates provided herein are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves will be recovered. The actual reserves on Encanas properties may be greater or less than those calculated.
For further information regarding the reserves process see Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information in this annual information form.
The following product types are referred to in the tables in this Appendix:
· Coalbed Methane, which includes coalbed methane commingled with shallow gas sands, related to the CBM key resource play in the Canadian Division.
· Shale Gas, which includes Horn River shale gas in the Canadian Division and Barnett and Haynesville shale gas in the USA Division.
· Other, which includes natural gas other than coalbed methane and shale gas. Reserves and production include the following key resource plays: Greater Sierra (excluding Horn River shale), Cutbank Ridge and Bighorn in the Canadian Division; and Jonah, Piceance and a majority of Texas in the USA Division.
· Oil and NGLs, which includes NGLs plus light and medium oil, of which light and medium oil is not material.
|
| |
Encana Corporation |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Reserves Data (Canadian Protocol) |
Summary of Oil and Gas Reserves (1)
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Before and After Royalties)
As at December 31, 2011
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs (MMbbls) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
945 |
|
982 |
|
215 |
|
205 |
|
2,049 |
|
1,810 |
|
3,209 |
|
2,997 |
|
|
39.9 |
|
37.9 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
223 |
|
221 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
409 |
|
394 |
|
632 |
|
615 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
1.7 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
651 |
|
637 |
|
458 |
|
426 |
|
2,117 |
|
1,932 |
|
3,226 |
|
2,995 |
|
|
64.6 |
|
54.8 |
|
Total Proved |
|
1,819 |
|
1,840 |
|
673 |
|
631 |
|
4,575 |
|
4,136 |
|
7,067 |
|
6,607 |
|
|
106.5 |
|
94.4 |
|
Probable |
|
411 |
|
417 |
|
681 |
|
585 |
|
1,796 |
|
1,608 |
|
2,888 |
|
2,610 |
|
|
42.9 |
|
35.7 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
2,230 |
|
2,257 |
|
1,354 |
|
1,216 |
|
6,371 |
|
5,744 |
|
9,955 |
|
9,217 |
|
|
149.4 |
|
130.1 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs (MMbbls) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
- |
|
- |
|
651 |
|
518 |
|
3,106 |
|
2,571 |
|
3,757 |
|
3,089 |
|
|
24.7 |
|
20.2 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
325 |
|
267 |
|
327 |
|
268 |
|
|
5.4 |
|
4.4 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,523 |
|
2,001 |
|
1,825 |
|
1,476 |
|
4,348 |
|
3,477 |
|
|
17.2 |
|
14.0 |
|
Total Proved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,176 |
|
2,520 |
|
5,256 |
|
4,314 |
|
8,432 |
|
6,834 |
|
|
47.3 |
|
38.6 |
|
Probable |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,374 |
|
2,691 |
|
2,885 |
|
2,388 |
|
6,259 |
|
5,079 |
|
|
24.5 |
|
20.1 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6,550 |
|
5,211 |
|
8,141 |
|
6,702 |
|
14,691 |
|
11,913 |
|
|
71.8 |
|
58.7 |
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs (MMbbls) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
945 |
|
982 |
|
866 |
|
723 |
|
5,155 |
|
4,381 |
|
6,966 |
|
6,086 |
|
|
64.6 |
|
58.1 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
223 |
|
221 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
734 |
|
661 |
|
959 |
|
883 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
6.1 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
651 |
|
637 |
|
2,981 |
|
2,427 |
|
3,942 |
|
3,408 |
|
7,574 |
|
6,472 |
|
|
81.8 |
|
68.8 |
|
Total Proved |
|
1,819 |
|
1,840 |
|
3,849 |
|
3,151 |
|
9,831 |
|
8,450 |
|
15,499 |
|
13,441 |
|
|
153.8 |
|
133.0 |
|
Probable |
|
411 |
|
417 |
|
4,055 |
|
3,276 |
|
4,681 |
|
3,996 |
|
9,147 |
|
7,689 |
|
|
67.4 |
|
55.8 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
2,230 |
|
2,257 |
|
7,904 |
|
6,427 |
|
14,512 |
|
12,446 |
|
24,646 |
|
21,130 |
|
|
221.2 |
|
188.8 |
|
Notes:
(1) Definitions
a) Gross reserves are Encanas working interest share before the deduction of estimated royalty obligations and excluding any royalty interests.
b) Net reserves are Encanas working interest share after deduction of estimated royalty obligations and including Encanas royalty interests.
c) Reserves are the estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, from a given date forward, based on: analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data; the use of established technology; and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable.
d) Proved reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.
e) Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater than or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.
f) Developed producing are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate. These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut-in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.
g) Developed non-producing reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production, but are shut-in, and the date of resumption of production is unknown.
h) Undeveloped reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (i.e., when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. They must fully meet the requirements of the reserves category (proved, probable) to which they are assigned.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Summary of Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Before Tax)
As at December 31, 2011
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue Before Future Income Tax and Discounted at |
| ||||||||
($ millions) |
|
0% |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
15% |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
11,307 |
|
8,317 |
|
6,533 |
|
5,393 |
|
4,612 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
981 |
|
724 |
|
587 |
|
500 |
|
436 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
10,009 |
|
5,303 |
|
2,979 |
|
1,677 |
|
885 |
|
Total Proved |
|
22,297 |
|
14,344 |
|
10,099 |
|
7,570 |
|
5,933 |
|
Probable |
|
12,496 |
|
5,893 |
|
3,301 |
|
2,054 |
|
1,366 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
34,793 |
|
20,237 |
|
13,400 |
|
9,624 |
|
7,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue Before Future Income Tax and Discounted at |
| ||||||||
($ millions) |
|
0% |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
15% |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
12,086 |
|
8,842 |
|
6,906 |
|
5,663 |
|
4,814 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
1,297 |
|
926 |
|
704 |
|
559 |
|
458 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
8,714 |
|
5,045 |
|
3,005 |
|
1,790 |
|
1,027 |
|
Total Proved |
|
22,097 |
|
14,813 |
|
10,615 |
|
8,012 |
|
6,299 |
|
Probable |
|
15,531 |
|
7,442 |
|
3,771 |
|
1,927 |
|
933 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
37,628 |
|
22,255 |
|
14,386 |
|
9,939 |
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Encana |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
Future Net Revenue Before Future Income Tax and Discounted at |
| ||||||||
($ millions) |
|
0% |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
15% |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
23,393 |
|
17,159 |
|
13,439 |
|
11,056 |
|
9,426 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
2,278 |
|
1,650 |
|
1,291 |
|
1,059 |
|
894 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
18,723 |
|
10,348 |
|
5,984 |
|
3,467 |
|
1,912 |
|
Total Proved |
|
44,394 |
|
29,157 |
|
20,714 |
|
15,582 |
|
12,232 |
|
Probable |
|
28,027 |
|
13,335 |
|
7,072 |
|
3,981 |
|
2,299 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
72,421 |
|
42,492 |
|
27,786 |
|
19,563 |
|
14,531 |
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Summary of Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue
(Forecast Prices and Costs; After Tax)
As at December 31, 2011
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue After Future Income Tax and Discounted at |
| ||||||||
($ millions) |
|
0% |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
15% |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
10,151 |
|
7,639 |
|
6,120 |
|
5,131 |
|
4,443 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
735 |
|
544 |
|
444 |
|
380 |
|
333 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
7,505 |
|
3,831 |
|
2,008 |
|
989 |
|
372 |
|
Total Proved |
|
18,391 |
|
12,014 |
|
8,572 |
|
6,500 |
|
5,148 |
|
Probable |
|
9,369 |
|
4,359 |
|
2,388 |
|
1,443 |
|
925 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
27,760 |
|
16,373 |
|
10,960 |
|
7,943 |
|
6,073 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue After Future Income Tax and Discounted at |
| ||||||||
($ millions) |
|
0% |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
15% |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
9,509 |
|
7,057 |
|
5,557 |
|
4,579 |
|
3,903 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
830 |
|
598 |
|
459 |
|
368 |
|
304 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
5,550 |
|
3,226 |
|
1,942 |
|
1,178 |
|
696 |
|
Total Proved |
|
15,889 |
|
10,881 |
|
7,958 |
|
6,125 |
|
4,903 |
|
Probable |
|
9,915 |
|
4,701 |
|
2,359 |
|
1,187 |
|
554 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
25,804 |
|
15,582 |
|
10,317 |
|
7,312 |
|
5,457 |
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue After Future Income Tax and Discounted at |
| ||||||||
($ millions) |
|
0% |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
15% |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed producing |
|
19,660 |
|
14,696 |
|
11,677 |
|
9,710 |
|
8,346 |
|
Developed non-producing |
|
1,565 |
|
1,142 |
|
903 |
|
748 |
|
637 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
13,055 |
|
7,057 |
|
3,950 |
|
2,167 |
|
1,068 |
|
Total Proved |
|
34,280 |
|
22,895 |
|
16,530 |
|
12,625 |
|
10,051 |
|
Probable |
|
19,284 |
|
9,060 |
|
4,747 |
|
2,630 |
|
1,479 |
|
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
53,564 |
|
31,955 |
|
21,277 |
|
15,255 |
|
11,530 |
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Additional Information Concerning Future Net Revenue
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Undiscounted)
As at December 31, 2011
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
($ millions) |
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
46,960 |
|
69,736 |
|
|
|
52,493 |
|
95,467 |
|
|
|
99,453 |
|
165,203 |
|
Royalties and production / mineral taxes |
|
4,079 |
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
12,657 |
|
22,394 |
|
|
|
16,736 |
|
29,100 |
|
Operating costs |
|
12,321 |
|
17,276 |
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
14,986 |
|
|
|
20,918 |
|
32,262 |
|
Development costs |
|
7,296 |
|
9,846 |
|
|
|
8,249 |
|
19,259 |
|
|
|
15,545 |
|
29,105 |
|
Abandonment costs |
|
967 |
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
2,315 |
|
Future net revenue, before income taxes |
|
22,297 |
|
34,793 |
|
|
|
22,097 |
|
37,628 |
|
|
|
44,394 |
|
72,421 |
|
Income tax |
|
3,906 |
|
7,033 |
|
|
|
6,208 |
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
10,114 |
|
18,857 |
|
Future net revenue, after income taxes |
|
18,391 |
|
27,760 |
|
|
|
15,889 |
|
25,804 |
|
|
|
34,280 |
|
53,564 |
|
Future Net Revenue by Production Group
(Forecast Prices and Costs)
As at December 31, 2011
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
Total |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane and |
|
|
|
Associated and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(discounted at 10%/yr, $ millions) |
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue Before Income Taxes |
|
5,269 |
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
15,445 |
|
19,658 |
|
|
|
20,714 |
|
27,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit Value ($/Mcf) (3) |
|
1.06 |
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
1.32 |
|
Notes:
(1) Includes by-products.
(2) Including by-products as well as future net revenue from oil (including solution gas and other by-products) which is not material.
(3) Unit values are based on net natural gas reserves volumes.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Pricing Assumptions (Forecast Prices) |
The following pricing and exchange rate assumptions were utilized by the independent qualified reserves evaluators in estimating Encanas reserves data using forecast prices and costs. These assumptions were provided by Encana, based on GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. pricing information, and are the same pricing assumptions used for the business case included in Net Proved Reserves (U.S. Protocol) in Appendix D in this annual information form.
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
|
Foreign |
|
Inflation | ||||
Year |
|
Henry Hub |
|
AECO |
|
WTI |
|
Edmonton (1) |
|
US$/C$ |
|
%/yr |
2011 (4,5) |
|
4.04 |
|
3.67 |
|
95.11 |
|
95.56 |
|
1.01 |
|
3.0 |
2012 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.49 |
|
97.00 |
|
97.96 |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
2013 |
|
4.50 |
|
4.13 |
|
100.00 |
|
101.02 |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
2014 |
|
5.00 |
|
4.59 |
|
100.00 |
|
101.02 |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
2015 |
|
5.50 |
|
5.05 |
|
100.00 |
|
101.02 |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
2016 |
|
6.00 |
|
5.51 |
|
100.00 |
|
101.02 |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
2017-2021 |
|
6.50 - 7.17 |
|
5.97 - 6.58 |
|
100.00 - 107.56 |
|
101.02 - 108.73 |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter: |
|
+2%/yr |
|
+2%/yr |
|
+2%/yr |
|
+2%/yr |
|
0.98 |
|
2.0 |
Notes:
(1) Light Sweet at Edmonton.
(2) The exchange rates used to generate the Canadian benchmark reference prices in this table.
(3) Default cost inflation rate. Abnormal inflationary situations in certain regions are handled individually by directly increasing the cost estimates for the years affected.
(4) Actual weighted average historical prices for 2011.
(5) Encanas weighted average prices for 2011 excluding the impact of realized hedging were $4.18/Mcf for natural gas and $85.20/bbl for oil & NGLs.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Reconciliation of Changes in Reserves (Before Royalties)
The following tables provide a reconciliation of Encanas gross reserves of natural gas, oil and NGLs for the year ended December 31, 2011, presented using forecast prices and costs.
Proved Reserves
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Before Royalties)
Canadian Division
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
1,810 |
|
511 |
|
4,434 |
|
6,755 |
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
7,126 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
148 |
|
138 |
|
522 |
|
808 |
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
1,101 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
32 |
|
225 |
|
132 |
|
389 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
428 |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
15 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
25 |
|
- |
|
57 |
|
82 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
84 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(5) |
|
(33 |
) |
(149 |
) |
(187) |
|
|
(6.1) |
|
|
(223) |
|
Economic factors |
|
(30) |
|
(134 |
) |
(70 |
) |
(234) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
(233) |
|
Production |
|
(161) |
|
(34 |
) |
(361 |
) |
(556) |
|
|
(6.0) |
|
|
(592) |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
1,819 |
|
673 |
|
4,575 |
|
7,067 |
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
7,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
- |
|
3,445 |
|
5,854 |
|
9,299 |
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
9,584 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
- |
|
675 |
|
211 |
|
886 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
898 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
- |
|
587 |
|
(14 |
) |
573 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
587 |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
12 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
28 |
|
28 |
|
|
- |
|
|
28 |
|
Dispositions |
|
- |
|
(1,100 |
) |
(216 |
) |
(1,316) |
|
|
(1.8) |
|
|
(1,327) |
|
Economic factors |
|
- |
|
(138 |
) |
(44 |
) |
(182) |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
(183) |
|
Production |
|
- |
|
(293 |
) |
(564 |
) |
(857) |
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
(883) |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
- |
|
3,176 |
|
5,256 |
|
8,432 |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
8,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
1,810 |
|
3,956 |
|
10,288 |
|
16,054 |
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
16,710 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
148 |
|
813 |
|
733 |
|
1,694 |
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
1,999 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
32 |
|
812 |
|
118 |
|
962 |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
1,015 |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
27 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
25 |
|
- |
|
85 |
|
110 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
112 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(5) |
|
(1,133 |
) |
(365 |
) |
(1,503) |
|
|
(7.9) |
|
|
(1,550) |
|
Economic factors |
|
(30) |
|
(272 |
) |
(114 |
) |
(416) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
(416) |
|
Production |
|
(161) |
|
(327 |
) |
(925 |
) |
(1,413) |
|
|
(10.3) |
|
|
(1,475) |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
1,819 |
|
3,849 |
|
9,831 |
|
15,499 |
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
16,422 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Probable Reserves
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Before Royalties)
Canadian Division
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
463 |
|
502 |
|
1,695 |
|
2,660 |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
2,799 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
44 |
|
102 |
|
261 |
|
407 |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
540 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
(94) |
|
(78 |
) |
(84 |
) |
(256) |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
(260) |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
26 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
6 |
|
79 |
|
10 |
|
95 |
|
|
- |
|
|
95 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(1) |
|
(18 |
) |
(94 |
) |
(113) |
|
|
(3.9) |
|
|
(137) |
|
Economic factors |
|
(7) |
|
94 |
|
(8 |
) |
79 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
82 |
|
Production |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
411 |
|
681 |
|
1,796 |
|
2,888 |
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
- |
|
3,528 |
|
3,765 |
|
7,293 |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
7,468 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
- |
|
1,994 |
|
911 |
|
2,905 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
2,928 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
- |
|
(1,771 |
) |
(1,741 |
) |
(3,512) |
|
|
(10.0) |
|
|
(3,571) |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Acquisitions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
45 |
|
45 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
53 |
|
Dispositions |
|
- |
|
(286 |
) |
(54 |
) |
(340) |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
(340) |
|
Economic factors |
|
- |
|
(91 |
) |
(41 |
) |
(132) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(132) |
|
Production |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
- |
|
3,374 |
|
2,885 |
|
6,259 |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
6,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
463 |
|
4,030 |
|
5,460 |
|
9,953 |
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
10,267 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
44 |
|
2,096 |
|
1,172 |
|
3,312 |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
3,468 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
(94) |
|
(1,849 |
) |
(1,825 |
) |
(3,768) |
|
|
(10.6) |
|
|
(3,831) |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
26 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
6 |
|
79 |
|
55 |
|
140 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
148 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(1) |
|
(304 |
) |
(148 |
) |
(453) |
|
|
(4.0) |
|
|
(477) |
|
Economic factors |
|
(7) |
|
3 |
|
(49 |
) |
(53) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
(50) |
|
Production |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
411 |
|
4,055 |
|
4,681 |
|
9,147 |
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
9,551 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Proved Plus Probable Reserves
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Before Royalties)
Canadian Division
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
2,273 |
|
1,013 |
|
6,129 |
|
9,415 |
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
9,925 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
192 |
|
240 |
|
783 |
|
1,215 |
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
1,641 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
(62) |
|
147 |
|
48 |
|
133 |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
168 |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
41 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
31 |
|
79 |
|
67 |
|
177 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
179 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(6) |
|
(51 |
) |
(243) |
|
(300) |
|
|
(10.0) |
|
|
(360) |
|
Economic factors |
|
(37) |
|
(40 |
) |
(78) |
|
(155) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
(151) |
|
Production |
|
(161) |
|
(34 |
) |
(361) |
|
(556) |
|
|
(6.0) |
|
|
(592) |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
2,230 |
|
1,354 |
|
6,371 |
|
9,955 |
|
|
149.4 |
|
|
10,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
- |
|
6,973 |
|
9,619 |
|
16,592 |
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
17,052 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
- |
|
2,669 |
|
1,122 |
|
3,791 |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
3,826 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
- |
|
(1,184 |
) |
(1,755) |
|
(2,939) |
|
|
(7.6) |
|
|
(2,984) |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
12 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
73 |
|
73 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
81 |
|
Dispositions |
|
- |
|
(1,386 |
) |
(270) |
|
(1,656) |
|
|
(1.9) |
|
|
(1,667) |
|
Economic factors |
|
- |
|
(229 |
) |
(85) |
|
(314) |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
(315) |
|
Production |
|
- |
|
(293 |
) |
(564) |
|
(857) |
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
(883) |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
- |
|
6,550 |
|
8,141 |
|
14,691 |
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
15,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
2,273 |
|
7,986 |
|
15,748 |
|
26,007 |
|
|
161.7 |
|
|
26,977 |
|
Extensions and improved recovery |
|
192 |
|
2,909 |
|
1,905 |
|
5,006 |
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
5,467 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
(62) |
|
(1,037 |
) |
(1,707) |
|
(2,806) |
|
|
(1.7) |
|
|
(2,816) |
|
Discoveries |
|
- |
|
- |
|
27 |
|
27 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
53 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
31 |
|
79 |
|
140 |
|
250 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
260 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(6) |
|
(1,437 |
) |
(513) |
|
(1,956) |
|
|
(11.9) |
|
|
(2,027) |
|
Economic factors |
|
(37) |
|
(269 |
) |
(163) |
|
(469) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
(466) |
|
Production |
|
(161) |
|
(327 |
) |
(925) |
|
(1,413) |
|
|
(10.3) |
|
|
(1,475) |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
2,230 |
|
7,904 |
|
14,512 |
|
24,646 |
|
|
221.2 |
|
|
25,973 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Undeveloped Reserves, Significant Factors or Uncertainties and Future Development Costs
Undeveloped Reserves
Proved and probable undeveloped reserves are attributed where warranted on the basis of technical merit, commercial considerations and development plans. These development opportunities are being pursued at a pace dependent on capital availability and allocation. As a result, development is scheduled beyond the next two years. All of the proved and probable undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2011 are scheduled for development within the next five and eight years respectively in Canada and the United States.
The following table discloses, for each product type, the volumes of proved undeveloped reserves that were first attributed in each of the three most recent financial years and, in the aggregate, before that time.
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
Oil & NGLs (MMbbls) |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
923 |
|
923 |
|
368 |
|
368 |
|
4,611 |
|
4,611 |
|
5,902 |
|
5,902 |
|
42.1 |
|
42.1 |
|
2009 |
|
- |
|
559 |
|
832 |
|
1,217 |
|
1,222 |
|
4,500 |
|
2,054 |
|
6,276 |
|
11.6 |
|
38.1 |
|
2010 |
|
282 |
|
688 |
|
1,161 |
|
2,808 |
|
1,105 |
|
4,449 |
|
2,548 |
|
7,945 |
|
18.7 |
|
53.8 |
|
2011 |
|
73 |
|
651 |
|
657 |
|
2,981 |
|
914 |
|
3,942 |
|
1,644 |
|
7,574 |
|
21.8 |
|
81.8 |
|
The following table discloses, for each product type, the volumes of probable undeveloped reserves that were first attributed in each of the three most recent financial years and, in the aggregate, before that time.
Probable Undeveloped Reserves
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
Oil & NGLs (MMbbls) |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
First |
|
Total at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
166 |
|
166 |
|
593 |
|
593 |
|
4,671 |
|
4,671 |
|
5,430 |
|
5,430 |
|
46.9 |
|
46.9 |
|
2009 |
|
- |
|
182 |
|
1,771 |
|
2,264 |
|
1,421 |
|
4,419 |
|
3,192 |
|
6,865 |
|
10.1 |
|
41.8 |
|
2010 |
|
67 |
|
290 |
|
2,289 |
|
3,889 |
|
1,459 |
|
4,901 |
|
3,815 |
|
9,080 |
|
12.9 |
|
42.6 |
|
2011 |
|
36 |
|
232 |
|
2,017 |
|
3,880 |
|
1,176 |
|
4,085 |
|
3,229 |
|
8,197 |
|
15.5 |
|
52.7 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Significant Factors or Uncertainties
The development schedule of our undeveloped reserves is based on forecast price assumptions for the determination of economic projects. The actual prices that occur may be significantly lower or higher resulting in some projects being delayed or accelerated, as the case may be. For further information see Risk Factors in this annual information form.
Our reserves can be affected significantly by fluctuations in product pricing, capital expenditures, operating costs, royalty regimes and well performance that are beyond our control.
Future Development Costs
The table below summarizes Encanas development costs deducted in the estimation of future net revenue attributable to proved reserves and proved plus probable reserves, using undiscounted forecast prices and costs.
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
USA Division |
|
Total Encana |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
($ millions) |
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
1,204 |
|
1,319 |
|
964 |
|
1,310 |
|
2,168 |
|
2,629 |
|
2013 |
|
1,650 |
|
1,883 |
|
1,684 |
|
2,306 |
|
3,334 |
|
4,189 |
|
2014 |
|
1,425 |
|
1,865 |
|
2,007 |
|
2,849 |
|
3,432 |
|
4,714 |
|
2015 |
|
1,197 |
|
1,623 |
|
1,680 |
|
2,621 |
|
2,877 |
|
4,244 |
|
2016 |
|
920 |
|
1,757 |
|
1,684 |
|
3,059 |
|
2,604 |
|
4,816 |
|
Remainder |
|
900 |
|
1,399 |
|
230 |
|
7,114 |
|
1,130 |
|
8,513 |
|
Total |
|
7,296 |
|
9,846 |
|
8,249 |
|
19,259 |
|
15,545 |
|
29,105 |
|
Future development costs are associated with reserves as evaluated by the IQREs and do not necessarily represent Encanas exploration and development budget. Encana expects to fund its future development costs with future cash flow, available cash balances, divestitures, joint ventures, or a combination of these.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Abandonment, Tax and Costs Incurred
Abandonment and Reclamation Costs
Encana expects to incur abandonment and site reclamation costs as existing oil and gas properties are abandoned and reclaimed. The asset retirement obligation (ARO) is estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows of the settlement. The discounted cash flows are based on estimates of reserve lives, retirement costs, discount rates and future inflation rates. In 2011, expenditures for normal compliance with environmental regulations as well as expenditures beyond normal compliance were not material. Based on Encanas current estimate, the total anticipated undiscounted future cost of abandonment and reclamation costs to be incurred is estimated at approximately $4.4 billion ($415 million discounted at 10 percent). As at December 31, 2011, Encana has recorded an asset retirement obligation of $1,043 million. These estimates include the abandonment of 21,469 net wells. Over the next three years, Encanas net well abandonment and reclamation cost is expected to total $138 million ($120 million discounted at 10 percent).
For the purposes of the reserves evaluations prepared by the IQREs, costs deducted as abandonment costs in estimating future net revenue do not include reclamation costs or abandonment costs of facilities and wells without reserves.
Tax Horizon
On a consolidated basis, Encana was not cash taxable for 2011. The Company currently estimates it will not be cash taxable until 2013; however, the cash tax forecast may be revised for factors including the outlook for natural gas, oil and NGL commodity prices, and the expectations for capital investments, including acquisition and disposition transactions, by the Company.
2011 Costs Incurred
($ millions) |
|
Canadian |
|
USA |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved |
|
261 |
|
53 |
|
314 |
|
Proved |
|
149 |
|
52 |
|
201 |
|
Total acquisitions |
|
410 |
|
105 |
|
515 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
174 |
|
181 |
|
355 |
|
Development costs |
|
1,848 |
|
2,242 |
|
4,090 |
|
Total costs incurred |
|
2,432 |
|
2,528 |
|
4,960 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Location of Oil and Gas Wells |
The following table summarizes Encanas interests in natural gas or oil wells which are producing, or the Company considers capable of production, as at December 31, 2011.
For additional information on the location of Encanas properties, plants, facilities and installations, refer to Narrative Description of the Business in this annual information form.
|
|
Producing Gas |
|
Producing Oil |
|
Total Producing (1,2) |
|
Non-Producing |
|
Non-Producing |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
(number of wells) |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta |
|
12,293 |
|
11,131 |
|
232 |
|
162 |
|
12,525 |
|
11,293 |
|
1,333 |
|
1,073 |
|
218 |
|
169 |
|
1,551 |
|
1,242 |
|
British Columbia |
|
1,579 |
|
1,447 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1,580 |
|
1,447 |
|
295 |
|
255 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
299 |
|
256 |
|
Total Canadian Division |
|
13,872 |
|
12,578 |
|
233 |
|
162 |
|
14,105 |
|
12,740 |
|
1,628 |
|
1,328 |
|
222 |
|
170 |
|
1,850 |
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
|
4,821 |
|
3,925 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
4,824 |
|
3,925 |
|
209 |
|
169 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
209 |
|
169 |
|
Texas |
|
776 |
|
495 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
777 |
|
496 |
|
14 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
15 |
|
6 |
|
Wyoming |
|
1,803 |
|
1,441 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1,804 |
|
1,441 |
|
80 |
|
62 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
80 |
|
62 |
|
Utah |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Louisiana |
|
412 |
|
218 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
413 |
|
219 |
|
83 |
|
29 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
83 |
|
29 |
|
Kansas |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Michigan |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
Mississippi |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Montana |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Total USA Division |
|
7,816 |
|
6,083 |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
7,824 |
|
6,086 |
|
392 |
|
272 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
393 |
|
272 |
|
Total Encana |
|
21,688 |
|
18,661 |
|
241 |
|
165 |
|
21,929 |
|
18,826 |
|
2,020 |
|
1,600 |
|
223 |
|
170 |
|
2,243 |
|
1,770 |
|
Notes:
(1) Encana has varying royalty interests in approximately 9,407 natural gas wells and approximately 6,416 oil wells which are producing or capable of producing.
(2) Includes wells containing multiple completions as follows; approximately 25,063 gross natural gas wells (23,400 net wells) and approximately 158 gross oil (121 net wells).
(3) Non-producing wells refer to wells that are capable of producing oil or natural gas, but which are not producing due to the timing of well completions and/or waiting to be tied in which is anticipated to occur in 2012, or are wells that are temporarily shut-in due to market conditions, but not yet abandoned. All non-producing oil and natural gas wells considered capable of producing are located near existing infrastructure and/or within economic distance of transportation.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Landholdings with No Attributed Reserves |
The following table summarizes the gross and net acres with no attributed reserves in which Encana has an interest at December 31, 2011 and the net acres with no attributed reserves for which we expect our rights to explore, develop and exploit to expire during 2012.
(thousands of acres) |
|
Gross Acres (1) |
|
Net Acres (1) |
|
Net Acres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta |
|
4,557 |
|
3,968 |
|
180 |
|
British Columbia |
|
2,122 |
|
1,707 |
|
364 |
|
Newfoundland and Labrador |
|
35 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
Nova Scotia |
|
21 |
|
10 |
|
- |
|
Northwest Territories |
|
45 |
|
12 |
|
- |
|
Total Canada |
|
6,780 |
|
5,699 |
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
|
806 |
|
774 |
|
15 |
|
Texas |
|
322 |
|
248 |
|
35 |
|
Wyoming |
|
322 |
|
287 |
|
12 |
|
Louisiana |
|
195 |
|
195 |
|
28 |
|
Michigan |
|
430 |
|
430 |
|
- |
|
Mississippi |
|
173 |
|
164 |
|
25 |
|
Other |
|
34 |
|
29 |
|
1 |
|
Total United States |
|
2,282 |
|
2,127 |
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
104 |
|
40 |
|
- |
|
Total International |
|
104 |
|
40 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
9,166 |
|
7,866 |
|
660 |
|
Note:
(1) Properties with different formations under the same surface area and subject to separate leases have been calculated on an aerial basis, as such gross and net acreage have only been counted once.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Exploration and Development Activities |
The following tables summarize Encanas gross participation and net interest in wells drilled for the periods indicated. See Narrative Description of the Business in this annual information form, for discussion on Encanas most important current and likely exploration and development activities.
Exploration Wells Drilled (1,2)
|
|
Gas |
|
Oil |
|
Service |
|
Dry and |
|
Royalty |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
2011 (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
30 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
31 |
|
63 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
USA Division |
|
19 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5 |
|
27 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total |
|
49 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
36 |
|
90 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
Notes:
(1) Gross wells are the total number of wells in which Encana has an interest.
(2) Net wells are the number of wells obtained by aggregating Encanas working interest in each of its gross wells.
(3) At December 31, 2011, Encana was in the process of drilling the following exploratory and development wells: approximately 19 gross wells (17 net wells) in Canada and approximately 89 gross wells (52 net wells) in the United States.
Development Wells Drilled (1,2)
|
|
Gas |
|
Oil |
|
Service |
|
Dry and |
|
Royalty |
|
Total |
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
2011 (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
725 |
|
706 |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
10 |
|
6 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
221 |
|
958 |
|
714 |
|
|
USA Division |
|
695 |
|
392 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
|
206 |
|
909 |
|
396 |
|
|
Total |
|
1,420 |
|
1,098 |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
13 |
|
9 |
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
|
427 |
|
1,867 |
|
1,110 |
|
|
Notes:
(1) Gross wells are the total number of wells in which Encana has an interest.
(2) Net wells are the number of wells obtained by aggregating Encanas working interest in each of its gross wells.
(3) At December 31, 2011, Encana was in the process of drilling the following exploratory and development wells: approximately 19 gross wells (17 net wells) in Canada and approximately 89 gross wells (52 net wells) in the United States.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Production Volumes (Before Royalties) |
2012 Production Estimates
(Before Royalties)
The following table summarizes the total volume of production estimated for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is reflected in the estimate of gross proved reserves and gross probable reserves disclosed in the tables contained under Reserves Data (Canadian Protocol) in this Appendix above.
Canadian Division
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
Oil & NGLs | ||||||
(annual) |
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
151 |
|
37 |
|
422 |
|
610 |
|
7.8 |
Probable |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
14 |
|
21 |
|
0.4 |
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
155 |
|
40 |
|
436 |
|
631 |
|
8.2 |
USA Division
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
Oil & NGLs | ||||||
(annual) |
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
- |
|
247 |
|
507 |
|
754 |
|
4.1 |
Probable |
|
- |
|
10 |
|
20 |
|
30 |
|
0.1 |
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
- |
|
257 |
|
527 |
|
784 |
|
4.2 |
Total Encana
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
Oil & NGLs | ||||||
(annual) |
|
Coalbed Methane |
|
Shale Gas |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
151 |
|
284 |
|
929 |
|
1,364 |
|
11.9 |
Probable |
|
4 |
|
13 |
|
34 |
|
51 |
|
0.5 |
Total Proved Plus Probable |
|
155 |
|
297 |
|
963 |
|
1,415 |
|
12.4 |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
2011 Production Volumes by Country
(Before Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
(average daily) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coalbed Methane (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
440 |
|
455 |
|
435 |
|
438 |
|
434 |
|
USA Division |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
440 |
|
455 |
|
435 |
|
438 |
|
434 |
|
Shale Gas (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
92 |
|
109 |
|
101 |
|
87 |
|
71 |
|
USA Division |
|
808 |
|
921 |
|
836 |
|
795 |
|
677 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
1,030 |
|
937 |
|
882 |
|
748 |
|
Other (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
989 |
|
1,026 |
|
985 |
|
992 |
|
951 |
|
USA Division |
|
1,544 |
|
1,516 |
|
1,541 |
|
1,541 |
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
2,542 |
|
2,526 |
|
2,533 |
|
2,527 |
|
Total Produced Gas (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
1,521 |
|
1,590 |
|
1,521 |
|
1,517 |
|
1,456 |
|
USA Division |
|
2,352 |
|
2,437 |
|
2,377 |
|
2,336 |
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
4,027 |
|
3,898 |
|
3,853 |
|
3,709 |
|
Total Oil & NGLs (Mbbls/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
16.5 |
|
16.0 |
|
17.3 |
|
16.7 |
|
16.1 |
|
USA Division |
|
11.7 |
|
12.5 |
|
11.4 |
|
11.6 |
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
28.5 |
|
28.7 |
|
28.3 |
|
27.2 |
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Per-Unit Results (Before Royalties) |
The following tables summarize the net per-unit results for Encana for the periods indicated, which exclude the impact of realized hedging.
Netbacks by Country
(Before Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coalbed Methane ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division and Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
3.64 |
|
3.32 |
|
3.75 |
|
3.83 |
|
3.69 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.06 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.05 |
|
0.05 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.06 |
|
0.05 |
|
0.05 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.08 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.16 |
|
0.14 |
|
0.17 |
|
0.16 |
|
0.15 |
|
Operating |
|
1.26 |
|
1.15 |
|
1.25 |
|
1.18 |
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
1.91 |
|
2.21 |
|
2.37 |
|
1.97 |
|
Shale Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
3.22 |
|
2.82 |
|
3.17 |
|
3.50 |
|
3.54 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.05 |
|
0.04 |
|
0.05 |
|
0.06 |
|
0.06 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Transportation |
|
0.78 |
|
0.78 |
|
0.79 |
|
0.81 |
|
0.72 |
|
Operating |
|
0.58 |
|
0.67 |
|
0.05 |
|
0.64 |
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
1.33 |
|
2.28 |
|
1.99 |
|
1.61 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
4.15 |
|
3.69 |
|
4.39 |
|
4.36 |
|
4.22 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.88 |
|
0.83 |
|
0.95 |
|
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.03 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.04 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.03 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.77 |
|
0.68 |
|
0.82 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.71 |
|
Operating |
|
0.56 |
|
0.45 |
|
0.48 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
1.70 |
|
2.10 |
|
2.01 |
|
1.83 |
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
4.05 |
|
3.60 |
|
4.26 |
|
4.28 |
|
4.16 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.80 |
|
0.75 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.80 |
|
0.79 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.03 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.04 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.03 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.77 |
|
0.69 |
|
0.82 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.71 |
|
Operating |
|
0.56 |
|
0.48 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
1.65 |
|
2.11 |
|
2.02 |
|
1.81 |
|
Other ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
3.88 |
|
3.54 |
|
4.00 |
|
4.05 |
|
3.96 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.20 |
|
0.19 |
|
0.18 |
|
0.23 |
|
0.20 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.01 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Transportation |
|
0.53 |
|
0.54 |
|
0.54 |
|
0.54 |
|
0.52 |
|
Operating |
|
1.02 |
|
0.99 |
|
0.91 |
|
1.06 |
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
1.82 |
|
2.36 |
|
2.22 |
|
2.11 |
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Netbacks by Country
(Before Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
4.60 |
|
4.24 |
|
4.82 |
|
4.78 |
|
4.56 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.87 |
|
0.91 |
|
0.95 |
|
0.82 |
|
0.80 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.26 |
|
0.24 |
|
0.24 |
|
0.29 |
|
0.29 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.89 |
|
0.88 |
|
0.83 |
|
0.95 |
|
0.91 |
|
Operating |
|
0.46 |
|
0.48 |
|
0.40 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
1.73 |
|
2.40 |
|
2.30 |
|
2.02 |
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
4.32 |
|
3.96 |
|
4.50 |
|
4.50 |
|
4.33 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.61 |
|
0.62 |
|
0.65 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.57 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.16 |
|
0.14 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.18 |
|
0.18 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.75 |
|
0.74 |
|
0.72 |
|
0.79 |
|
0.76 |
|
Operating |
|
0.68 |
|
0.68 |
|
0.60 |
|
0.67 |
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
1.78 |
|
2.38 |
|
2.27 |
|
2.05 |
|
Total Produced Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
3.77 |
|
3.43 |
|
3.88 |
|
3.96 |
|
3.86 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.15 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.14 |
|
0.17 |
|
0.15 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.02 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.02 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.44 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.45 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.42 |
|
Operating |
|
1.06 |
|
1.01 |
|
0.95 |
|
1.07 |
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
1.82 |
|
2.32 |
|
2.26 |
|
2.04 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
4.45 |
|
4.03 |
|
4.67 |
|
4.64 |
|
4.46 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.87 |
|
0.88 |
|
0.95 |
|
0.84 |
|
0.82 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.18 |
|
0.16 |
|
0.17 |
|
0.20 |
|
0.21 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.85 |
|
0.80 |
|
0.83 |
|
0.92 |
|
0.85 |
|
Operating |
|
0.49 |
|
0.47 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.47 |
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
1.72 |
|
2.29 |
|
2.21 |
|
1.96 |
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
4.18 |
|
3.79 |
|
4.36 |
|
4.37 |
|
4.22 |
|
Royalties |
|
0.59 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.63 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.56 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.12 |
|
0.10 |
|
0.11 |
|
0.13 |
|
0.14 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.69 |
|
0.66 |
|
0.68 |
|
0.73 |
|
0.68 |
|
Operating |
|
0.72 |
|
0.68 |
|
0.63 |
|
0.71 |
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
1.76 |
|
2.31 |
|
2.22 |
|
1.98 |
|
Total Oil & NGLs ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
85.09 |
|
86.13 |
|
83.79 |
|
91.77 |
|
78.47 |
|
Royalties |
|
10.07 |
|
11.01 |
|
10.36 |
|
9.88 |
|
9.00 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.79 |
|
1.07 |
|
0.56 |
|
0.55 |
|
1.00 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.82 |
|
0.59 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.04 |
|
0.61 |
|
Operating |
|
1.53 |
|
1.73 |
|
1.18 |
|
1.47 |
|
1.79 |
|
|
|
71.88 |
|
71.73 |
|
70.69 |
|
78.83 |
|
66.07 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
85.37 |
|
84.13 |
|
80.53 |
|
93.69 |
|
83.08 |
|
Royalties |
|
16.18 |
|
16.57 |
|
15.47 |
|
17.43 |
|
15.17 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
6.11 |
|
5.62 |
|
4.77 |
|
7.64 |
|
6.48 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.07 |
|
0.19 |
|
0.07 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Operating |
|
0.57 |
|
1.65 |
|
0.50 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
62.44 |
|
60.10 |
|
59.72 |
|
68.62 |
|
61.43 |
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Netbacks by Country
(Before Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oil & NGLs ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, before royalties |
|
85.20 |
|
85.25 |
|
82.49 |
|
92.55 |
|
80.35 |
|
Royalties |
|
12.60 |
|
13.44 |
|
12.39 |
|
12.98 |
|
11.52 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
2.99 |
|
3.06 |
|
2.23 |
|
3.46 |
|
3.24 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.51 |
|
0.41 |
|
0.63 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.36 |
|
Operating |
|
1.13 |
|
1.69 |
|
0.91 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
67.97 |
|
66.65 |
|
66.33 |
|
74.63 |
|
64.17 |
|
Impact of Realized Hedging on Encanas Netbacks
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
0.66 |
|
0.89 |
|
0.55 |
|
0.56 |
|
0.62 |
|
USA Division |
|
0.70 |
|
0.92 |
|
0.63 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.64 |
|
Total |
|
0.68 |
|
0.91 |
|
0.60 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.63 |
|
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) | |
Canadian Protocol Reserves Disclosure |
Appendix B - Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluators (Canadian Protocol) |
To the Board of Directors of Encana Corporation (the Corporation):
1. |
We have evaluated the Corporations reserves data as at December 31, 2011 prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101) of the Canadian Securities Administrators. The reserves data are estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2011, estimated using forecast prices and costs. |
|
|
2. |
The reserves data are the responsibility of the Corporations management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the reserves data based on our evaluation. |
|
|
|
We carried out our evaluation in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the COGE Handbook) prepared jointly by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society). |
|
|
3. |
Those standards require that we plan and perform an evaluation to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the reserves data are free of material misstatement. An evaluation also includes assessing whether the reserves data are in accordance with the principles and definitions presented in the COGE Handbook. |
|
|
4. |
The following table sets forth the estimated future net revenue (before deduction of income taxes) attributed to proved plus probable reserves, estimated using forecast prices and costs and calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent, included in the reserves data of the Corporation evaluated by us for the year ended December 31, 2011: |
Independent Qualified |
|
Preparation Date of |
|
Location of Reserves |
|
Net Present Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. |
|
January 19, 2012 |
|
Canada |
|
3,310 |
GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. |
|
January 20, 2012 |
|
Canada |
|
10,090 |
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. |
|
January 24, 2012 |
|
United States |
|
9,186 |
DeGolyer and MacNaughton |
|
January 31, 2012 |
|
United States |
|
5,200 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
27,786 |
5. |
In our opinion, the reserves data respectively evaluated by us have, in all material respects, been determined and are in accordance with the COGE Handbook, consistently applied. |
|
|
6. |
We have no responsibility to update our reports referred to in paragraph 4 for events and circumstances occurring after their respective preparation dates. |
|
|
7. |
Because the reserves data are based on judgments regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material. |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Executed as to our report referred to above:
(signed) McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
(signed) GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(signed) Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. |
(signed) DeGolyer and MacNaughton Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. |
February 15, 2012
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Appendix C - Report of Management and Directors on Reserves Data and Other Information (Canadian Protocol) |
Management of Encana Corporation (the Corporation) is responsible for the preparation and disclosure of information with respect to the Corporations oil and gas activities in accordance with securities regulatory requirements. This information includes reserves data which are estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2011, estimated using forecast prices and costs, prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101) of the Canadian Securities Administrators.
Independent qualified reserves evaluators have evaluated the Corporations reserves data. The report of the independent qualified reserves evaluators will be filed with securities regulatory authorities concurrently with this report.
The Reserves Committee of the board of directors of the Corporation, which is comprised exclusively of non-management and unrelated directors, has:
(a) reviewed the Corporations procedures for providing information to the independent qualified reserves evaluators;
(b) met with the independent qualified reserves evaluators to determine whether any restrictions affected the ability of the independent qualified reserves evaluators to report without reservation; and
(c) reviewed the reserves data with management and the independent qualified reserves evaluators.
The board of directors of the Corporation (the Board of Directors) has reviewed the Corporations procedures for assembling and reporting other information associated with oil and gas activities and has reviewed that information with management. The Board of Directors has approved:
(a) the content and filing with securities regulatory authorities of the reserves data and other oil and gas information prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 51-101 contained in the annual information form of the Corporation;
(b) the filing of the report of the independent qualified reserves evaluators on the reserves data; and
(c) the content and filing of this report.
Because the reserves data are based on judgments regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material.
(signed) Randall K. Eresman |
(signed) Robert A. Grant |
|
|
|
|
(signed) David P. OBrien |
(signed) Claire S. Farley |
February 16, 2012
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Appendix D - U.S. Protocol Disclosure of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information |
In this Appendix, Encana provides select disclosure of its reserves and other oil and gas information prepared in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements. See Note Regarding Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information.
Since inception, Encana has retained IQREs to evaluate and prepare reports on 100 percent of Encanas natural gas, oil and NGL reserves annually. For further information regarding the reserves process, see Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information in this annual information form.
The standards of the SEC require that proved reserves be estimated using existing economic conditions (constant pricing). Based on this methodology, Encanas results have been calculated utilizing the 12-month average price for each of the years presented within this Appendix.
Encanas 2011 and 2010 financial results were prepared in accordance with IFRS. As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, 2009 results were prepared in accordance with previous GAAP. Encanas 2009 upstream results include the operations from the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus. Under previous GAAP full cost accounting requirements, the results from the Cenovus upstream assets were reported as continuing operations, which are referred to as Canada Other in the following tables.
Net Proved Reserves (U.S. Protocol) |
Natural Gas Reserves
In 2011, Encanas proved natural gas reserves decreased by approximately three percent, due to dispositions and the impact of lower 12-month average prices more than offsetting successful development and delineation activity. Additions excluding the purchase and sale of lands with reserves attributable to them totaled 1,746 Bcf, split approximately one-half in the U.S. and one-half in Canada.
In 2010, Encanas proved natural gas reserves increased by approximately 20 percent, largely as a result of successful development and delineation activity as well as higher 12-month average prices. Technical revisions were positive. Additions excluding purchase and sale of lands with reserves attributable to them totaled 3,542 Bcf, of which approximately two-thirds were in the U.S. and the balance was in Canada.
In 2009, Encanas proved natural gas reserves decreased by approximately 19 percent, largely as a result of low 12-month average prices and the Split Transaction. Approximately 75 percent of the decrease attributable to negative revisions was a direct result of low 12-month average prices and approximately 80 percent of the sale of reserves in place was associated with the Split Transaction. Technical revisions were not significant. Extensions and discoveries were 2,132 Bcf, of which approximately two-thirds were in the U.S. and the balance was in Canada.
Oil & NGL Reserves
In 2011, Encanas proved oil and NGL reserves increased by approximately 44 percent primarily due to activities in Canada.
In 2010, Encanas proved oil and NGL reserves increased by approximately 21 percent as a result of activities and plans to further capture additional NGLs associated with natural gas production.
In 2009, Encanas proved oil and NGL reserves decreased by approximately 77 percent and Encanas bitumen reserves were divested, substantially all as a result of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Net Proved Reserves (1,2)
(SEC Constant Pricing; After Royalties)
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf) |
|
Oil and NGLs (MMbbls) |
|
Bitumen (3) |
| ||||||||
|
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
Canada |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
7,847 |
|
5,831 |
|
13,678 |
|
285.6 |
|
51.6 |
|
337.2 |
|
668.4 |
|
Revisions and improved recovery (4) |
|
(755 |
) |
(845 |
) |
(1,600 |
) |
7.3 |
|
(12.6 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
(87.6) |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
726 |
|
1,406 |
|
2,132 |
|
12.5 |
|
6.5 |
|
19.0 |
|
159.4 |
|
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
28 |
|
- |
|
28 |
|
0.5 |
|
- |
|
0.5 |
|
- |
|
Sale of reserves in place (5) |
|
(1,772 |
) |
(89 |
) |
(1,861 |
) |
(243.2 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(243.4 |
) |
(725.1) |
|
Production |
|
(725 |
) |
(590 |
) |
(1,315 |
) |
(27.2 |
) |
(4.1 |
) |
(31.3 |
) |
(15.1) |
|
End of year |
|
5,349 |
|
5,713 |
|
11,062 |
|
35.5 |
|
41.2 |
|
76.7 |
|
- |
|
Developed |
|
2,927 |
|
3,571 |
|
6,498 |
|
25.1 |
|
25.8 |
|
50.9 |
|
- |
|
Undeveloped |
|
2,422 |
|
2,142 |
|
4,564 |
|
10.4 |
|
15.4 |
|
25.8 |
|
- |
|
Total |
|
5,349 |
|
5,713 |
|
11,062 |
|
35.5 |
|
41.2 |
|
76.7 |
|
- |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
5,349 |
|
5,713 |
|
11,062 |
|
35.5 |
|
41.2 |
|
76.7 |
|
- |
|
Revisions and improved recovery |
|
150 |
|
517 |
|
667 |
|
13.6 |
|
0.2 |
|
13.8 |
|
- |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
1,067 |
|
1,808 |
|
2,875 |
|
11.5 |
|
4.7 |
|
16.2 |
|
- |
|
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
116 |
|
81 |
|
197 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.9 |
|
- |
|
Sale of reserves in place |
|
(82 |
) |
(257 |
) |
(339 |
) |
(1.9 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
(6.8 |
) |
- |
|
Production |
|
(483 |
) |
(679 |
) |
(1,162 |
) |
(4.8 |
) |
(3.5 |
) |
(8.3 |
) |
- |
|
End of year |
|
6,117 |
|
7,183 |
|
13,300 |
|
54.3 |
|
38.2 |
|
92.5 |
|
- |
|
Developed |
|
3,132 |
|
3,678 |
|
6,810 |
|
24.9 |
|
24.0 |
|
48.9 |
|
- |
|
Undeveloped |
|
2,985 |
|
3,505 |
|
6,490 |
|
29.4 |
|
14.2 |
|
43.6 |
|
- |
|
Total |
|
6,117 |
|
7,183 |
|
13,300 |
|
54.3 |
|
38.2 |
|
92.5 |
|
- |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
6,117 |
|
7,183 |
|
13,300 |
|
54.3 |
|
38.2 |
|
92.5 |
|
- |
|
Revisions and improved recovery |
|
3 |
|
(204 |
) |
(201 |
) |
32.3 |
|
(0.7 |
) |
31.6 |
|
- |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
826 |
|
1,121 |
|
1,947 |
|
18.2 |
|
5.4 |
|
23.6 |
|
- |
|
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
72 |
|
23 |
|
95 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
- |
|
Sale of reserves in place |
|
(158 |
) |
(927 |
) |
(1,085 |
) |
(4.7 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
(6.0 |
) |
- |
|
Production |
|
(531 |
) |
(685 |
) |
(1,216 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
(3.5 |
) |
(8.8 |
) |
- |
|
End of year |
|
6,329 |
|
6,511 |
|
12,840 |
|
95.0 |
|
38.2 |
|
133.2 |
|
- |
|
Developed |
|
3,523 |
|
3,286 |
|
6,809 |
|
39.6 |
|
24.4 |
|
64.0 |
|
- |
|
Undeveloped |
|
2,806 |
|
3,225 |
|
6,031 |
|
55.4 |
|
13.8 |
|
69.2 |
|
- |
|
Total |
|
6,329 |
|
6,511 |
|
12,840 |
|
95.0 |
|
38.2 |
|
133.2 |
|
- |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Notes:
(1) Definitions:
a. Net reserves are the remaining reserves of Encana, after deduction of estimated royalties and including royalty interests.
b. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations.
c. Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well.
d. Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
(2) Encana does not file any estimates of total net proved natural gas, oil and NGL reserves with any U.S. federal authority or agency other than the SEC.
(3) Encanas disclosure of bitumen reserve volumes is in accordance with amended SEC rules regarding disclosure by final products.
(4) Revisions and improved recovery includes revisions due to price. Approximately 75 percent of the negative revisions to natural gas in 2009 were attributable to the significantly lower prices in effect for SEC reporting purposes.
(5) The transfer of the Canadian upstream assets to Cenovus, effective November 30, 2009 pursuant to the Split Transaction, accounts for approximately 80 percent of the sale of reserves in place for natural gas and substantially all of the sale of reserves in place for oil and NGLs and for bitumen during 2009.
Pricing Assumptions (SEC Constant Pricing)
The following reference prices were utilized in the determination of reserves and future net revenue:
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Henry Hub |
|
AECO |
|
WTI |
|
Edmonton (1) |
|
Reserve Pricing (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
3.87 |
|
3.77 |
|
61.18 |
|
65.64 |
|
2010 |
|
4.38 |
|
4.03 |
|
79.43 |
|
76.22 |
|
2011 |
|
4.12 |
|
3.76 |
|
96.19 |
|
96.53 |
|
Notes:
(1) Light Sweet for 2011 and 2010; Mixed Sweet Blend for 2009.
(2) All prices were held constant in all future years when estimating net revenues and reserves.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Sensitivity of 2011 Reserves to Prices
The following table summarizes Encanas estimates of its proved reserves as at December 31, 2011 based on the 2011 12-month average prices (SEC Constant Pricing case) and on the prices set forth below:
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
| |||||||||
|
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
| |
Price Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SEC Constant Pricing case |
|
6,329 |
|
6,511 |
|
12,840 |
|
95.0 |
|
38.2 |
|
133.2 |
| |
Business case (forecast prices) |
|
6,607 |
|
6,834 |
|
13,441 |
|
94.4 |
|
38.6 |
|
133.0 |
| |
Difference versus SEC case |
|
4.4% |
|
5.0% |
|
4.7% |
|
(0.6% |
) |
1.0% |
|
(0.2% |
) | |
The business case assumes the following forecast prices: natural gas Henry Hub $3.80/MMBtu in 2012 increasing to $7.17/MMBtu in 2021, and AECO C$3.49/MMBtu in 2012 increasing to C$6.58/MMBtu in 2021; oil WTI $97.00/bbl increasing to $107.56/bbl in 2021 and Edmonton Light Sweet C$97.96/bbl increasing to C$108.73/bbl in 2021. Beyond 2021, prices were escalated at 2% per year. These forecast pricing assumptions are the same as those used for the Canadian forecast prices included in Pricing Assumptions (Forecast Prices) in Appendix A to this annual information form.
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
Encanas proved undeveloped natural gas reserves represented approximately 47 percent of total proved natural gas reserves at December 31, 2011, a slight decrease from approximately 49 percent at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2011, approximately 52 percent of Encanas proved oil and NGL reserves were undeveloped, an increase from approximately 47 percent at December 31, 2010. These changes in undeveloped reserves were predicated on technical merit, commercial considerations and development plans. All of the proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2011 are scheduled for development within the next five years in both Canada and the United States.
During 2011, approximately 1,220 Bcfe of proved undeveloped reserves were converted to proved developed reserves. Investments made during 2011 to convert proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves were approximately $1.5 billion.
At December 31, 2011, the proved undeveloped reserves which have remained undeveloped for five years or more in both Canada and the United States were not material.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows and Changes Therein |
In calculating the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, constant price and cost assumptions were applied to Encanas annual future production from proved reserves to determine cash inflows. Future production and development costs assume the continuation of existing economic, operating and regulatory conditions. Future income taxes are calculated by applying statutory income tax rates to future pre-tax cash flows after provision for the tax cost of the oil and natural gas properties based upon existing laws and regulations. The discount was computed by application of a 10 percent discount factor to the future net cash flows. The calculation of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is based upon the discounted future net cash flows prepared by Encanas IQREs in relation to the reserves they respectively evaluated, and adjusted to the extent provided by contractual arrangements, such as price risk management activities, in existence at year-end and to account for asset retirement obligations and future income taxes.
Encana cautions that the discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves are an indication of neither the fair market value of Encanas oil and gas properties, nor the future net cash flows expected to be generated from such properties. The discounted future net cash flows do not include the fair market value of exploratory properties and probable or possible oil and gas reserves, nor is consideration given to the effect of anticipated future changes in oil and natural gas prices, development, asset retirement and production costs and possible changes to tax and royalty regulations. The prescribed discount rate of 10 percent may not appropriately reflect future interest rates. The computation also excludes values attributable to Encanas Market Optimization interests.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
|
|
Canada |
|
United States | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows |
|
27,731 |
|
25,535 |
|
19,321 |
|
|
26,558 |
|
29,428 |
|
18,573 |
|
Less future: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
9,717 |
|
8,676 |
|
6,296 |
|
|
6,195 |
|
6,894 |
|
4,862 |
|
Development costs |
|
6,424 |
|
4,971 |
|
4,065 |
|
|
7,189 |
|
7,539 |
|
4,429 |
|
Asset retirement obligation payments |
|
1,762 |
|
1,876 |
|
1,508 |
|
|
597 |
|
605 |
|
640 |
|
Income taxes |
|
784 |
|
920 |
|
659 |
|
|
2,730 |
|
2,966 |
|
707 |
|
Future net cash flows |
|
9,044 |
|
9,092 |
|
6,793 |
|
|
9,847 |
|
11,424 |
|
7,935 |
|
Less 10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows |
|
3,759 |
|
3,803 |
|
2,704 |
|
|
4,384 |
|
5,277 |
|
3,592 |
|
Discounted future net cash flows |
|
5,285 |
|
5,289 |
|
4,089 |
|
|
5,463 |
|
6,147 |
|
4,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |||||
($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,289 |
|
54,963 |
|
37,894 |
|
Less future: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,912 |
|
15,570 |
|
11,158 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,613 |
|
12,510 |
|
8,494 |
|
Asset retirement obligation payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
2,481 |
|
2,148 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
3,886 |
|
1,366 |
|
Future net cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,891 |
|
20,516 |
|
14,728 |
|
Less 10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,143 |
|
9,080 |
|
6,296 |
|
Discounted future net cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,748 |
|
11,436 |
|
8,432 |
|
Notes:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
|
|
Canada |
|
United States | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
5,289 |
|
4,089 |
|
12,714 |
|
|
6,147 |
|
4,343 |
|
6,647 |
|
Changes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of oil and gas produced during the period |
|
(1,957 |
) |
(2,034 |
) |
(5,609 |
) |
|
(2,653 |
) |
(2,920 |
) |
(3,442 |
) |
Discoveries and extensions, net of related costs |
|
1,161 |
|
975 |
|
1,294 |
|
|
887 |
|
1,243 |
|
629 |
|
Purchases of proved reserves in place |
|
55 |
|
146 |
|
16 |
|
|
42 |
|
77 |
|
- |
|
Sales and transfers of proved reserves in place |
|
(212 |
) |
(96 |
) |
(6,492 |
) |
|
(1,021 |
) |
(198 |
) |
(62 |
) |
Net change in prices and production costs |
|
522 |
|
1,647 |
|
(1,825 |
) |
|
733 |
|
3,832 |
|
(1,446 |
) |
Revisions to quantity estimates |
|
188 |
|
174 |
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
(336 |
) |
610 |
|
(1,567 |
) |
Accretion of discount |
|
576 |
|
433 |
|
1,572 |
|
|
762 |
|
465 |
|
827 |
|
Previously estimated development costs incurred |
|
(441 |
) |
216 |
|
737 |
|
|
832 |
|
(289 |
) |
1,474 |
|
Other |
|
54 |
|
(28 |
) |
150 |
|
|
63 |
|
144 |
|
(26 |
) |
Net change in income taxes |
|
50 |
|
(233 |
) |
2,774 |
|
|
7 |
|
(1,160 |
) |
1,309 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
5,285 |
|
5,289 |
|
4,089 |
|
|
5,463 |
|
6,147 |
|
4,343 |
|
|
|
Total | |||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
11,436 |
|
8,432 |
|
19,361 |
|
Changes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of oil and gas produced during the period |
|
(4,610 |
) |
(4,954 |
) |
(9,051 |
) |
Discoveries and extensions, net of related costs |
|
2,048 |
|
2,218 |
|
1,923 |
|
Purchases of proved reserves in place |
|
97 |
|
223 |
|
16 |
|
Sales and transfers of proved reserves in place |
|
(1,233 |
) |
(294 |
) |
(6,554 |
) |
Net change in prices and production costs |
|
1,255 |
|
5,479 |
|
(3,271 |
) |
Revisions to quantity estimates |
|
(148 |
) |
784 |
|
(2,809 |
) |
Accretion of discount |
|
1,338 |
|
898 |
|
2,399 |
|
Previously estimated development costs incurred |
|
391 |
|
(73 |
) |
2,211 |
|
Other |
|
117 |
|
116 |
|
124 |
|
Net change in income taxes |
|
57 |
|
(1,393 |
) |
4,083 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
10,748 |
|
11,436 |
|
8,432 |
|
Notes:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
(2) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include reserves from the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Results of Operations
|
|
Canada |
|
United States | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues, net of royalties, and transportation |
|
2,622 |
|
2,632 |
|
6,835 |
|
|
3,294 |
|
3,613 |
|
4,007 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs, production and mineral taxes, and accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
665 |
|
598 |
|
1,226 |
|
|
641 |
|
693 |
|
565 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,411 |
|
1,286 |
|
1,980 |
|
|
1,922 |
|
1,954 |
|
1,561 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
546 |
|
748 |
|
3,629 |
|
|
731 |
|
966 |
|
1,881 |
|
Income taxes |
|
145 |
|
211 |
|
1,059 |
|
|
265 |
|
350 |
|
698 |
|
Results of operations |
|
401 |
|
537 |
|
2,570 |
|
|
466 |
|
616 |
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues, net of royalties, and transportation |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
5,916 |
|
6,245 |
|
10,842 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs, production and mineral taxes, and accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
1,306 |
|
1,291 |
|
1,791 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
- |
|
- |
|
28 |
|
|
3,333 |
|
3,240 |
|
3,569 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(28 |
) |
|
1,277 |
|
1,714 |
|
5,482 |
|
Income taxes |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
410 |
|
561 |
|
1,757 |
|
Results of operations |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(28 |
) |
|
867 |
|
1,153 |
|
3,725 |
|
Notes:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
(2) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include results from operations of the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Capitalized Costs and Costs Incurred
Capitalized Costs
|
|
Canada |
|
United States | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
26,606 |
|
24,736 |
|
21,459 |
|
|
22,229 |
|
21,703 |
|
19,843 |
|
Unproved oil and gas properties |
|
1,139 |
|
1,114 |
|
728 |
|
|
708 |
|
1,044 |
|
1,178 |
|
Total capital cost |
|
27,745 |
|
25,850 |
|
22,187 |
|
|
22,937 |
|
22,747 |
|
21,021 |
|
Accumulated DD&A |
|
14,628 |
|
13,606 |
|
11,586 |
|
|
10,774 |
|
8,781 |
|
7,092 |
|
Net capitalized costs |
|
13,117 |
|
12,244 |
|
10,601 |
|
|
12,163 |
|
13,966 |
|
13,929 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
48,835 |
|
46,439 |
|
41,302 |
|
Unproved oil and gas properties |
|
- |
|
- |
|
157 |
|
|
1,847 |
|
2,158 |
|
2,063 |
|
Total capital cost |
|
- |
|
- |
|
157 |
|
|
50,682 |
|
48,597 |
|
43,365 |
|
Accumulated DD&A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
147 |
|
|
25,402 |
|
22,387 |
|
18,825 |
|
Net capitalized costs |
|
- |
|
- |
|
10 |
|
|
25,280 |
|
26,210 |
|
24,540 |
|
Notes:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
(2) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include capitalized costs related to the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Costs Incurred
|
|
Canada |
|
United States | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved |
|
261 |
|
395 |
|
46 |
|
|
53 |
|
97 |
|
46 |
|
Proved |
|
149 |
|
197 |
|
178 |
|
|
52 |
|
44 |
|
- |
|
Total acquisitions |
|
410 |
|
592 |
|
224 |
|
|
105 |
|
141 |
|
46 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
174 |
|
58 |
|
129 |
|
|
181 |
|
198 |
|
133 |
|
Development costs |
|
1,848 |
|
2,148 |
|
2,588 |
|
|
2,242 |
|
2,297 |
|
1,688 |
|
Total costs incurred |
|
2,432 |
|
2,798 |
|
2,941 |
|
|
2,528 |
|
2,636 |
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total | ||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(1,2) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
314 |
|
492 |
|
92 |
|
Proved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
201 |
|
241 |
|
178 |
|
Total acquisitions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
515 |
|
733 |
|
270 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
|
355 |
|
256 |
|
264 |
|
Development costs |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
4,090 |
|
4,445 |
|
4,276 |
|
Total costs incurred |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
|
4,960 |
|
5,434 |
|
4,810 |
|
Notes:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
(2) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include costs incurred from operations of the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Developed and Undeveloped Landholdings |
The following table summarizes Encanas developed, undeveloped and total landholdings as at December 31, 2011.
Landholdings (1 - 7) |
|
|
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
Total |
| ||||||
(thousands of acres) |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta |
|
Fee |
|
2,302 |
|
2,302 |
|
1,249 |
|
1,249 |
|
3,551 |
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
Crown |
|
1,414 |
|
828 |
|
1,463 |
|
1,238 |
|
2,877 |
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
244 |
|
147 |
|
75 |
|
44 |
|
319 |
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
3,277 |
|
2,787 |
|
2,531 |
|
6,747 |
|
5,808 |
|
British Columbia |
|
Crown |
|
889 |
|
788 |
|
2,312 |
|
1,865 |
|
3,201 |
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
788 |
|
2,319 |
|
1,865 |
|
3,208 |
|
2,653 |
|
Newfoundland and Labrador |
|
Crown |
|
- |
|
- |
|
35 |
|
2 |
|
35 |
|
2 |
|
Nova Scotia |
|
Crown |
|
20 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
10 |
|
41 |
|
30 |
|
Northwest Territories |
|
Crown |
|
- |
|
- |
|
45 |
|
12 |
|
45 |
|
12 |
|
Total Canada |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
4,085 |
|
5,207 |
|
4,420 |
|
10,076 |
|
8,505 |
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
|
Federal/State |
|
186 |
|
174 |
|
503 |
|
469 |
|
689 |
|
643 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
107 |
|
98 |
|
106 |
|
96 |
|
213 |
|
194 |
|
|
|
Fee |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
14 |
|
14 |
|
17 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
275 |
|
623 |
|
579 |
|
919 |
|
854 |
|
Texas |
|
Federal/State |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
55 |
|
53 |
|
59 |
|
55 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
113 |
|
73 |
|
247 |
|
176 |
|
360 |
|
249 |
|
|
|
Fee |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
75 |
|
306 |
|
233 |
|
423 |
|
308 |
|
Louisiana |
|
Federal/State |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
145 |
|
82 |
|
211 |
|
147 |
|
356 |
|
229 |
|
|
|
Fee |
|
10 |
|
6 |
|
84 |
|
65 |
|
94 |
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
89 |
|
297 |
|
214 |
|
453 |
|
303 |
|
Michigan |
|
Federal/State |
|
- |
|
- |
|
368 |
|
368 |
|
368 |
|
368 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
- |
|
- |
|
61 |
|
61 |
|
61 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
429 |
|
429 |
|
429 |
|
429 |
|
Mississippi |
|
Freehold |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
142 |
|
135 |
|
143 |
|
136 |
|
|
|
Fee |
|
- |
|
- |
|
31 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
173 |
|
165 |
|
174 |
|
166 |
|
Wyoming |
|
Federal/State |
|
69 |
|
55 |
|
294 |
|
257 |
|
363 |
|
312 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
15 |
|
12 |
|
20 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
59 |
|
309 |
|
269 |
|
383 |
|
328 |
|
Other |
|
Federal/State |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
30 |
|
22 |
|
31 |
|
24 |
|
|
|
Freehold |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
6 |
|
8 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
37 |
|
28 |
|
39 |
|
31 |
|
Total United States |
|
|
|
646 |
|
502 |
|
2,174 |
|
1,917 |
|
2,820 |
|
2,419 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
104 |
|
40 |
|
104 |
|
40 |
|
Total International |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
104 |
|
40 |
|
104 |
|
40 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
4,587 |
|
7,485 |
|
6,377 |
|
13,000 |
|
10,964 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Notes:
(1) Fee lands are those lands in which Encana has a fee simple interest in the mineral rights and has either: (i) not leased out all of the mineral zones; or (ii) retained a working interest; or (iii) one or more substances or products that have not been leased. The current fee lands acreage summary includes all fee titles owned by Encana that have one or more zones that remain unleased or available for development.
(2) This table excludes approximately 2.9 million gross acres of fee lands with one or more substances or products under lease or sublease, reserving to Encana royalties or other interests.
(3) Crown/Federal/State lands are those owned by the federal, provincial or state government or the First Nations, in which Encana has purchased a working interest lease.
(4) Freehold lands are owned by individuals (other than a government or Encana), in which Encana holds a working interest lease.
(5) Gross acres are the total area of properties in which Encana has an interest.
(6) Net acres are the sum of Encanas fractional interest in gross acres.
(7) Undeveloped acreage refers to those acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.
Exploration and Development Activities
The following tables summarize Encanas gross participation and net interest in wells drilled for the periods indicated.
Exploration Wells Drilled (1, 2)
|
|
Gas |
|
Oil |
|
Dry & |
|
Total Working |
|
Royalty |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
30 |
|
19 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
30 |
|
19 |
|
31 |
|
61 |
|
19 |
|
USA Division |
|
19 |
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
22 |
|
9 |
|
5 |
|
27 |
|
9 |
|
Total |
|
49 |
|
25 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
52 |
|
28 |
|
36 |
|
88 |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
22 |
|
15 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
22 |
|
15 |
|
31 |
|
53 |
|
15 |
|
USA Division |
|
34 |
|
15 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
36 |
|
17 |
|
- |
|
36 |
|
17 |
|
Total |
|
56 |
|
30 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
58 |
|
32 |
|
31 |
|
89 |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
34 |
|
24 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
35 |
|
25 |
|
25 |
|
60 |
|
25 |
|
USA Division |
|
8 |
|
4 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
- |
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
28 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
44 |
|
29 |
|
25 |
|
69 |
|
29 |
|
Canada Other (3) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
12 |
|
4 |
|
Total |
|
42 |
|
28 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
48 |
|
33 |
|
33 |
|
81 |
|
33 |
|
Notes:
(1) Gross wells are the total number of wells in which Encana has an interest.
(2) Net wells are the number of wells obtained by aggregating Encanas working interest in each of its gross wells.
(3) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include wells drilled on Canadian upstream properties transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Development Wells Drilled (1, 2)
|
|
Gas |
|
Oil |
|
Dry & |
|
Total Working |
|
Royalty |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
2011 (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
725 |
|
706 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
727 |
|
708 |
|
221 |
|
948 |
|
708 |
|
USA Division |
|
695 |
|
392 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
700 |
|
393 |
|
206 |
|
906 |
|
393 |
|
Total |
|
1,420 |
|
1,098 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
1,427 |
|
1,101 |
|
427 |
|
1,854 |
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
1,270 |
|
1,190 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,271 |
|
1,191 |
|
203 |
|
1,474 |
|
1,191 |
|
USA Division |
|
748 |
|
428 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
752 |
|
431 |
|
144 |
|
896 |
|
431 |
|
Total |
|
2,018 |
|
1,618 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
2,023 |
|
1,622 |
|
347 |
|
2,370 |
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
731 |
|
672 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
734 |
|
674 |
|
143 |
|
877 |
|
674 |
|
USA Division |
|
495 |
|
382 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
500 |
|
386 |
|
55 |
|
555 |
|
386 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
1,054 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
1,234 |
|
1,060 |
|
198 |
|
1,432 |
|
1,060 |
|
Canada Other (4) |
|
560 |
|
507 |
|
144 |
|
120 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
712 |
|
635 |
|
255 |
|
967 |
|
635 |
|
Total |
|
1,786 |
|
1,561 |
|
147 |
|
122 |
|
13 |
|
12 |
|
1,946 |
|
1,695 |
|
453 |
|
2,399 |
|
1,695 |
|
Notes:
(1) Gross wells are the total number of wells in which Encana has an interest.
(2) Net wells are the number of wells obtained by aggregating Encanas working interest in each of its gross wells.
(3) At December 31, 2011, Encana was in the process of drilling the following exploratory and development wells: approximately 19 gross wells (17 net wells) in Canada and approximately 89 gross wells (52 net wells) in the U.S.
(4) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include wells drilled on Canadian upstream properties transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Production Volumes (After Royalties)
The following tables summarize the net daily average production volumes for Encana for the periods indicated.
Production Volumes
(After Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
(average daily) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Produced Gas (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
1,454 |
|
1,515 |
|
1,460 |
|
1,445 |
|
1,395 |
|
USA Division |
|
1,879 |
|
1,944 |
|
1,905 |
|
1,864 |
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
3,459 |
|
3,365 |
|
3,309 |
|
3,196 |
|
Oil & NGLs (Mbbls/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
14.5 |
|
13.9 |
|
15.1 |
|
14.8 |
|
14.3 |
|
USA Division |
|
9.5 |
|
10.0 |
|
9.3 |
|
9.5 |
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
23.9 |
|
24.4 |
|
24.3 |
|
23.3 |
|
(average daily) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Produced Gas (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
1,224 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
2,840 |
|
Canada Other (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
762 |
|
Total Produced Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & NGLs (Mbbls/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
15.9 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
27.2 |
|
Canada Other (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
99.9 |
|
Total Oil & NGLs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
127.1 |
|
Notes:
(1) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include production from operations of the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Per-Unit Results (After Royalties)
The following tables summarize the net per-unit results for Encana for the periods indicated, which exclude the impact of realized hedging.
Netbacks by Country
(After Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
| |||||||||
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
| |
Produced Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Price, after royalties |
|
3.79 |
|
|
3.44 |
|
3.89 |
|
3.97 |
|
3.87 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.02 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.02 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.46 |
|
|
0.47 |
|
0.47 |
|
0.47 |
|
0.43 |
|
Operating |
|
1.11 |
|
|
1.06 |
|
0.99 |
|
1.13 |
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
1.89 |
|
2.41 |
|
2.35 |
|
2.14 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
4.47 |
|
|
3.95 |
|
4.64 |
|
4.76 |
|
4.56 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.23 |
|
|
0.20 |
|
0.21 |
|
0.25 |
|
0.26 |
|
Transportation |
|
1.06 |
|
|
1.01 |
|
1.03 |
|
1.15 |
|
1.06 |
|
Operating |
|
0.62 |
|
|
0.59 |
|
0.53 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
2.15 |
|
2.87 |
|
2.77 |
|
2.47 |
|
Total Canadian & USA Divisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
4.17 |
|
|
3.73 |
|
4.32 |
|
4.42 |
|
4.26 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.14 |
|
|
0.12 |
|
0.13 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.16 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.80 |
|
|
0.77 |
|
0.79 |
|
0.85 |
|
0.79 |
|
Operating |
|
0.83 |
|
|
0.80 |
|
0.73 |
|
0.82 |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
2.04 |
|
2.67 |
|
2.60 |
|
2.32 |
|
Oil & NGLs ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
85.41 |
|
|
86.52 |
|
84.05 |
|
92.10 |
|
78.73 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.90 |
|
|
1.23 |
|
0.64 |
|
0.62 |
|
1.14 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.93 |
|
|
0.68 |
|
1.15 |
|
1.16 |
|
0.69 |
|
Operating |
|
1.75 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
1.35 |
|
1.65 |
|
2.03 |
|
|
|
81.83 |
|
|
82.61 |
|
80.91 |
|
88.67 |
|
74.87 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
85.28 |
|
|
83.93 |
|
79.81 |
|
93.53 |
|
83.81 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
7.54 |
|
|
6.98 |
|
5.85 |
|
9.38 |
|
8.00 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.08 |
|
|
0.24 |
|
0.08 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Operating |
|
0.70 |
|
|
2.04 |
|
0.61 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
76.96 |
|
|
74.67 |
|
73.27 |
|
84.15 |
|
75.81 |
|
Total Canadian & USA Divisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
85.36 |
|
|
85.44 |
|
82.43 |
|
92.66 |
|
80.70 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
3.52 |
|
|
3.64 |
|
2.63 |
|
4.03 |
|
3.80 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.60 |
|
|
0.49 |
|
0.74 |
|
0.71 |
|
0.42 |
|
Operating |
|
1.34 |
|
|
2.01 |
|
1.07 |
|
1.01 |
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
79.90 |
|
|
79.30 |
|
77.99 |
|
86.91 |
|
75.24 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Netbacks by Country
(After Royalties)
|
|
Annual Average |
| ||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 (1) |
|
Produced Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
Canada (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
4.10 |
|
3.64 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.01 |
|
0.04 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.40 |
|
0.26 |
|
Operating |
|
1.09 |
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
2.36 |
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
4.73 |
|
3.75 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.27 |
|
0.17 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.97 |
|
0.90 |
|
Operating |
|
0.58 |
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
2.13 |
|
Total Encana (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
4.47 |
|
3.69 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.16 |
|
0.10 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.73 |
|
0.55 |
|
Operating |
|
0.79 |
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
2.25 |
|
Oil & NGLs ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
Canada (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
64.79 |
|
49.75 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
0.44 |
|
0.63 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.82 |
|
1.53 |
|
Operating |
|
3.24 |
|
9.21 |
|
|
|
60.29 |
|
38.38 |
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
69.35 |
|
48.56 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
6.69 |
|
4.39 |
|
Transportation |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Operating |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
62.66 |
|
44.17 |
|
Total Encana (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Price, after royalties |
|
66.72 |
|
49.65 |
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
3.08 |
|
0.97 |
|
Transportation |
|
0.47 |
|
1.39 |
|
Operating |
|
1.87 |
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
61.30 |
|
38.90 |
|
Note:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
(2) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include production from operations of the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
The following tables summarize the impact of realized hedging on Encanas netbacks.
Impact of Realized Hedging on Encanas Netbacks
|
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
0.69 |
|
0.93 |
|
0.57 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.64 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
0.87 |
|
1.15 |
|
0.78 |
|
0.73 |
|
0.81 |
|
Total Encana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
0.79 |
|
1.06 |
|
0.69 |
|
0.67 |
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Average |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 (1) |
|
Canada (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
3.25 |
|
Oil & NGLs ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.04 |
) |
0.91 |
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
3.41 |
|
Total Encana (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
3.33 |
|
Oil & NGLs ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.60 |
) |
0.83 |
|
Notes:
(1) As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, the Companys 2009 results are based on previous GAAP.
(2) Results prior to November 30, 2009 include production from operations of the Canadian upstream assets that were transferred to Cenovus as part of the Split Transaction.
Encana Corporation |
|
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Protocol Reserves Disclosure
Last updated December 8, 2009. Last reviewed December 6, 2011.
I. PURPOSE
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is appointed by the Board of Directors of Encana Corporation (the Corporation) to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities.
The Committees primary duties and responsibilities are to:
· |
|
Review managements identification of principal financial risks and monitor the process to manage such risks. |
· |
|
Oversee and monitor the Corporations compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. |
· |
|
Receive and review the reports of the Audit Committee of any subsidiary with public securities. |
· |
|
Oversee and monitor the integrity of the Corporations accounting and financial reporting processes, financial statements and system of internal controls regarding accounting and financial reporting and accounting compliance. |
· |
|
Oversee audits of the Corporations financial statements. |
· |
|
Oversee and monitor the qualifications, independence and performance of the Corporations external auditors and internal auditing department. |
· |
|
Provide an avenue of communication among the external auditors, management, the internal auditing department, and the Board of Directors. |
· |
|
Report to the Board of Directors regularly. |
The Committee has the authority to conduct any review or investigation appropriate to fulfilling its responsibilities. The Committee shall have unrestricted access to personnel and information, and any resources necessary to carry out its responsibility. In this regard, the Committee may direct internal audit personnel to particular areas of examination.
II. COMPOSITION AND MEETINGS
Committee Members Duties in addition to those of a Director
The duties and responsibilities of a member of the Committee are in addition to those duties set out for a member of the Board of Directors.
Composition
The Committee shall consist of not less than three and not more than five directors as determined by the Board, all of whom shall qualify as independent directors pursuant to National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees (as implemented by the Canadian Securities Administrators and as amended from time to time) (NI 52-110).
All members of the Committee shall be financially literate, as defined in NI 52-110, and at least one member shall have accounting or related financial managerial expertise. In particular, at least one member shall have, through (i) education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant or auditor or experience in one or more positions that involve the performance of similar functions; (ii) experience actively supervising a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant, auditor or person performing similar functions; (iii) experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements; or (iv) other relevant experience:
· An understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements;
· The ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
· Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Corporations financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;
· An understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and
· An understanding of audit committee functions.
Committee members may not, other than in their respective capacities as members of the Committee, the Board or any other committee of the Board, accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation, or be an affiliated person (as such term is defined in the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) thereunder) of the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation. For greater certainty, directors fees and fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with the Corporation that are not contingent on continued service should be the only compensation an audit committee member receives from the Corporation.
At least one member shall have experience in the oil and gas industry.
Committee members shall not simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies, unless the Board first determines that such simultaneous service will not impair the ability of the relevant members to effectively serve on the Committee, and required public disclosure is made.
The non-executive Board Chairman shall be a non-voting member of the Committee. See Quorum for further details.
Appointment of Members
Committee members shall be appointed at a meeting of the Board, effective after the election of directors at the annual meeting of shareholders, provided that any member may be removed or replaced at any time by the Board and shall, in any event, cease to be a member of the Committee upon ceasing to be a member of the Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend for approval to the Board an unrelated Director to act as Chairman of the Committee. The Board shall appoint the Chairman of the Committee.
If the Chairman of the Committee is unavailable or unable to attend a meeting of the Committee, the Chair shall ask another member to chair the meeting, failing which a member of the Committee present at the meeting shall be chosen to preside over the meeting by a majority of the members of the Committee present at such meeting.
The Chairman of the Committee presiding at any meeting of the Committee shall not have a casting vote.
The items pertaining to the Chairman in this section should be read in conjunction with the Committee Chair section of the Chair of the Board of Directors and Committee Chair General Guidelines.
Where a vacancy occurs at any time in the membership of the Committee, it may be filled by the Board.
The Corporate Secretary or one of the Assistant Corporate Secretaries of the Corporation or such other person as the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation shall designate from time to time shall be the Secretary of the Committee and shall keep minutes of the meetings of the Committee.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Meetings
Committee meetings may, by agreement of the Chairman of the Committee, be held in person, by video conference, by means of telephone or by a combination of any of the foregoing.
The Committee shall meet at least quarterly. The Chairman of the Committee may call additional meetings as required. In addition, a meeting may be called by the non-executive Board Chairman, the President & Chief Executive Officer, or any member of the Committee or by the external auditors.
The Committee shall have the right to determine who shall, and who shall not, be present at any time during a meeting of the Committee.
Directors, who are not members of the Committee, may attend Committee meetings, on an ad hoc basis, upon prior consultation and approval by the Committee Chairman or by a majority of the members of the Committee.
The Committee may, by specific invitation, have other resource persons in attendance.
The President & Chief Executive Officer, the Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer, the Executive Vice-President & Chief Accounting Officer and the Vice-President, Financial Compliance & Audit are expected to be available to attend the Committees meetings or portions thereof.
Notice of Meeting
Notice of the time and place of each Committee meeting may be given orally, or in writing, or by facsimile, or by electronic means to each member of the Committee at least 48 hours prior to the time fixed for such meeting. Notice of each meeting shall also be given to the external auditors of the Corporation.
A member and the external auditors may, in any manner, waive notice of the Committee meeting. Attendance of a member at a meeting shall constitute waiver of notice of the meeting except where a member attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business on the grounds that the meeting was not lawfully called.
Quorum
A majority of Committee members, present in person, by video conference, by telephone, or by a combination thereof, shall constitute a quorum. In addition, if an ex officio, non-voting members presence is required to attain a quorum of the Committee, then the said member shall be allowed to cast a vote at the meeting.
Minutes
Minutes of each Committee meeting should be succinct yet comprehensive in describing substantive issues discussed by the Committee. However, they should clearly identify those items of responsibilities scheduled by the Committee for the meeting that have been discharged by the Committee and those items of responsibilities that are outstanding.
Minutes of Committee meetings shall be sent to all Committee members and to the external auditors.
The full Board of Directors shall be kept informed of the Committees activities by a report following each Committee meeting.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
III. RESPONSIBILITIES
Review Procedures
Review and update the Committees mandate annually, or sooner, where the Committee deems it appropriate to do so. Provide a summary of the Committees composition and responsibilities in the Corporations annual report or other public disclosure documentation.
Provide a summary of all approvals by the Committee of the provision of audit, audit-related, tax and other services by the external auditors for inclusion in the Corporations annual report filed with the SEC.
Annual Financial Statements
1. Discuss and review with management and the external auditors the Corporations and any subsidiary with public securities annual audited financial statements and related documents prior to their filing or distribution. Such review to include:
a. The annual financial statements and related footnotes including significant issues regarding accounting principles, practices and significant management estimates and judgments, including any significant changes in the Corporations selection or application of accounting principles, any major issues as to the adequacy of the Corporations internal controls and any special steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies.
b. Managements Discussion and Analysis.
c. A review of the use of off-balance sheet financing including managements risk assessment and adequacy of disclosure.
d. A review of the external auditors audit examination of the financial statements and their report thereon.
e. Review of any significant changes required in the external auditors audit plan.
f. A review of any serious difficulties or disputes with management encountered during the course of the audit, including any restrictions on the scope of the external auditors work or access to required information.
g. A review of other matters related to the conduct of the audit, which are to be communicated to the Committee under generally accepted auditing standards.
2. Review and formally recommend approval to the Board of the Corporations:
a. Year-end audited financial statements. Such review shall include discussions with management and the external auditors as to:
(i) The accounting policies of the Corporation and any changes thereto.
(ii) The effect of significant judgements, accruals and estimates.
(iii) The manner of presentation of significant accounting items.
(iv) The consistency of disclosure.
b. Managements Discussion and Analysis.
c. Annual Information Form as to financial information.
d. All prospectuses and information circulars as to financial information.
The review shall include a report from the external auditors about the quality of the most critical accounting principles upon which the Corporations financial status depends, and which involve the most complex, subjective or significant judgemental decisions or assessments.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Quarterly Financial Statements
3. Review with management and the external auditors and either approve (such approval to include the authorization for public release) or formally recommend for approval to the Board the Corporations:
a. Quarterly unaudited financial statements and related documents, including Managements Discussion and Analysis.
b. Any significant changes to the Corporations accounting principles.
Review quarterly unaudited financial statements of any subsidiary of the Corporation with public securities prior to their distribution.
Other Financial Filings and Public Documents
4. Review and discuss with management financial information, including earnings press releases, the use of pro forma or non-GAAP financial information and earnings guidance, contained in any filings with the securities regulators or news releases related thereto (or provided to analysts or rating agencies) and consider whether the information is consistent with the information contained in the financial statements of the Corporation or any subsidiary with public securities. Such discussion may be done generally (consisting of discussing the types of information to be disclosed and the types of presentations to be made).
Internal Control Environment
5. Ensure that management, the external auditors, and the internal auditors provide to the Committee an annual report on the Corporations control environment as it pertains to the Corporations financial reporting process and controls.
6. Review and discuss significant financial risks or exposures and assess the steps management has taken to monitor, control, report and mitigate such risk to the Corporation.
7. Review significant findings prepared by the external auditors and the internal auditing department together with managements responses.
8. Review in consultation with the internal auditors and the external auditors the degree of coordination in the audit plans of the internal auditors and the external auditors and enquire as to the extent the planned scope can be relied upon to detect weaknesses in internal controls, fraud, or other illegal acts. The Committee will assess the coordination of audit effort to assure completeness of coverage and the effective use of audit resources. Any significant recommendations made by the auditors for the strengthening of internal controls shall be reviewed and discussed with management.
Other Review Items
9. Review policies and procedures with respect to officers and directors expense accounts and perquisites, including their use of corporate assets, and consider the results of any review of these areas by the internal auditor or the external auditors.
10. Review all related party transactions between the Corporation and any officers or directors, including affiliations of any officers or directors.
11. Review with the General Counsel, the head of internal audit and the external auditors the results of their review of the Corporations monitoring compliance with each of the Corporations published codes of business conduct and applicable legal requirements.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
12. Review legal and regulatory matters, including correspondence with regulators and governmental agencies, that may have a material impact on the interim or annual financial statements, related corporation compliance policies, and programs and reports received from regulators or governmental agencies. Members from the Legal and Tax departments should be at the meeting in person to deliver their reports.
13. Review policies and practices with respect to off-balance sheet transactions and trading and hedging activities, and consider the results of any review of these areas by the internal auditors or the external auditors.
14. Ensure that the Corporations presentations on net proved reserves have been reviewed with the Reserves Committee of the Board.
15. Review managements processes in place to prevent and detect fraud.
16. Review procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Corporation, including confidential, anonymous submissions by employees of the Corporation, regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters.
17. Review with the President & Chief Executive Officer, the Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and the external auditors: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the Corporations internal controls and procedures for financial reporting which could adversely affect the Corporations ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act or applicable Canadian federal and provincial legislation and regulations within the required time periods, and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management of the Corporation or other employees who have a significant role in the Corporations internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.
18. Meet on a periodic basis separately with management.
External Auditors
19. Be directly responsible, in the Committees capacity as a committee of the Board and subject to the rights of shareholders and applicable law, for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the external auditors (including resolution of disagreements between management and the external auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report, or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Corporation. The external auditors shall report directly to the Committee.
20. Meet on a regular basis with the external auditors (without management present) and have the external auditors be available to attend Committee meetings or portions thereof at the request of the Chairman of the Committee or by a majority of the members of the Committee.
21. Review and discuss a report from the external auditors at least quarterly regarding:
a. |
All critical accounting policies and practices to be used; |
|
|
b. |
All alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting principles for policies and practices related to material items that have been discussed with management, including the ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the external auditors; and |
|
|
c. |
Other material written communications between the external auditors and management, such as any management letter or schedule of unadjusted differences. |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
22. Obtain and review a report from the external auditors at least annually regarding:
a. The external auditors internal quality-control procedures.
b. Any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the external auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the external auditors, and any steps taken to deal with those issues.
c. To the extent contemplated in the following paragraph, all relationships between the external auditors and the Corporation.
23. Review and discuss with the external auditors all relationships that the external auditors and their affiliates have with the Corporation and its affiliates in order to determine the external auditors independence, including, without limitation, (i) receiving and reviewing, as part of the report described in the preceding paragraph, a formal written statement from the external auditors delineating all relationships that may reasonably be thought to bear on the independence of the external auditors with respect to the Corporation and its affiliates, (ii) discussing with the external auditors any disclosed relationships or services that the external auditors believe may affect the objectivity and independence of the external auditors, and (iii) recommending that the Board take appropriate action in response to the external auditors report to satisfy itself of the external auditors independence.
24. Review and evaluate:
a. The external auditors and the lead partner of the external auditors teams performance, and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding the reappointment of the external auditors at the annual meeting of the Corporations shareholders or regarding the discharge of such external auditors.
b. The terms of engagement of the external auditors together with their proposed fees.
c. External audit plans and results.
d. Any other related audit engagement matters.
e. The engagement of the external auditors to perform non-audit services, together with the fees therefor, and the impact thereof, on the independence of the external auditors.
25. Upon reviewing and discussing the information provided to the Committee in accordance with paragraphs 21 through 24, evaluate the external auditors qualifications, performance and independence, including whether or not the external auditors quality controls are adequate and the provision of permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence, taking into account the opinions of management and the head of internal audit. The Committee shall present its conclusions with respect to the external auditors to the Board.
26. Ensure the rotation of partners on the audit engagement team in accordance with applicable law. Consider whether, in order to assure continuing external auditor independence, it is appropriate to adopt a policy of rotating the external auditing firm on a regular basis.
27. Set clear hiring policies for the Corporations hiring of employees or former employees of the external auditors.
28. Consider with management and the external auditors the rationale for employing audit firms other than the principal external auditors.
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
29. Consider and review with the external auditors, management and the head of internal audit:
a. Significant findings during the year and managements responses and follow-up thereto.
b. Any difficulties encountered in the course of their audits, including any restrictions on the scope of their work or access to required information, and managements response.
c. Any significant disagreements between the external auditors or internal auditors and management.
d. Any changes required in the planned scope of their audit plan.
e. The resources, budget, reporting relationships, responsibilities and planned activities of the internal auditors.
f. The internal audit department mandate.
g. Internal audits compliance with the Institute of Internal Auditors standards.
Internal Audit Department and Independence
30. |
Meet on a periodic basis separately with the head of internal audit. |
|
|
31. |
Review and concur in the appointment, compensation, replacement, reassignment, or dismissal of the head of internal audit. |
|
|
32. |
Confirm and assure, annually, the independence of the internal audit department and the external auditors. |
Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
33. |
Review and, where appropriate, approve the provision of all permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) in advance of the provision of those services by the external auditors (subject to the de minimus exception for non-audit services described in the Exchange Act or applicable Canadian federal and provincial legislation and regulations which are approved by the Committee prior to the completion of the audit). |
|
|
34. |
Review and, where appropriate and permitted, approve the provision of all audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) in advance of the provision of those services by the external auditors. |
|
|
35. |
If the pre-approvals contemplated in paragraphs 33 and 34 are not obtained, approve, where appropriate and permitted, the provision of all audit and non-audit services promptly after the Committee or a member of the Committee to whom authority is delegated becomes aware of the provision of those services. |
|
|
36. |
Delegate, if the Committee deems necessary or desirable, to subcommittees consisting of one or more members of the Committee, the authority to grant the pre-approvals and approvals described in paragraphs 33 through 35. The decision of any such subcommittee to grant pre-approval shall be presented to the full Committee at the next scheduled Committee meeting. |
|
|
37. |
The Committee may establish policies and procedures for the pre-approvals described in paragraphs 33 and 34, so long as such policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the Committee is informed of each service and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the Committees responsibilities under the Exchange Act or applicable Canadian federal and provincial legislation and regulations to management. |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Other Matters
38. |
Review and concur in the appointment, replacement, reassignment, or dismissal of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
39. |
Upon a majority vote of the Committee outside resources may be engaged where and if deemed advisable. |
|
|
40. |
Report Committee actions to the Board of Directors with such recommendations, as the Committee may deem appropriate. |
|
|
41. |
Conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the Committees scope of responsibilities. The Committee shall be empowered to retain, obtain advice or otherwise receive assistance from independent counsel, accountants, or others to assist it in the conduct of any investigation as it deems necessary and the carrying out of its duties. |
|
|
42. |
The Corporation shall provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee in its capacity as a committee of the Board, for payment (i) of compensation to the external auditors for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Corporation, (ii) of compensation to any advisors employed by the Committee and (iii) of ordinary administrative expenses of the Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties. |
|
|
43. |
Obtain assurance from the external auditors that disclosure to the Committee is not required pursuant to the provisions of the Exchange Act regarding the discovery of illegal acts by the external auditors. |
|
|
44. |
The Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of this Mandate annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval. |
|
|
45. |
The Committees performance shall be evaluated annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
46. |
Perform such other functions as required by law, the Corporations mandate or bylaws, or the Board of Directors. |
|
|
47. |
Consider any other matters referred to it by the Board of Directors. |
Encana Corporation |
Annual Information Form (prepared in US$) |
Encana Corporation
Managements Discussion and Analysis
For the year ended December 31, 2011
(U.S. Dollars)
Managements Discussion and Analysis
This Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) for Encana Corporation (Encana or the Company) should be read with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The Consolidated Financial Statements and comparative information have been prepared in United States (U.S.) dollars, except where another currency has been indicated, and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Prior to 2011, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada (previous GAAP). Unless otherwise noted, comparative information has been prepared in accordance with IFRS. Production volumes are presented on an after royalties basis consistent with U.S. oil and gas reporting and the disclosure of U.S. oil and gas companies. The term liquids is used to represent oil, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate. The term liquids-rich is used to represent natural gas streams with associated liquids volumes. This document is dated February 23, 2012.
Certain measures in this document do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by accounting policies and, therefore, are considered non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are commonly used in the oil and gas industry and by Encana to provide shareholders and potential investors with additional information regarding the Companys liquidity and its ability to generate funds to finance its operations. Non-GAAP measures include Cash Flow, Operating Earnings, Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow, Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (Adjusted EBITDA), Debt to Adjusted EBITDA, Capitalization, Debt to Capitalization and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE). Further information can be found in the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A, including reconciliations of Cash from Operating Activities to Cash Flow and of Net Earnings to Operating Earnings.
Readers should also read the Advisory section located at the end of this document, which provides information on Forward-Looking Statements, Oil and Gas Information and Currency and References to Encana.
Encanas Strategic Objectives
Encana is a leading North American energy producer that is focused on growing its strong portfolio of diverse resource plays producing natural gas, oil and NGLs. Encana is pursuing the key business objectives of maintaining financial strength, optimizing capital investments in the Companys highest return projects and continuing to pay a stable dividend to shareholders as it pursues disciplined, responsible and reliable low-cost production growth.
Encanas extensive portfolio of reserves and economic contingent resources in high-growth resource plays in major North American basins serves as the foundation for the Companys long-term strategy of accelerating the value recognition of its assets. Encana has a history of entering prospective basins early and leveraging technology to unlock resources and build the underlying productive capacity at a low cost.
Encana continually strives to improve operating efficiencies, foster technology innovation and lower its cost structures, while reducing its environmental footprint through resource play optimization. The Companys resource play hub model, which utilizes highly integrated production facilities, is used to develop resources by drilling multiple wells from central pad sites. Repeatable operations lend themselves to ongoing cost reductions through optimization of equipment and processes by applying continuous improvement techniques.
Encana is focused on balancing near term market uncertainty with capital investment to build long-term production growth capacity. Encanas approach for 2012 is to align capital investment plus anticipated dividends with expected cash flow generation, before divestiture proceeds. Proceeds from planned divestitures and joint venture transactions are expected to provide additional financial flexibility. Given the current natural gas pricing environment, the Company expects that many of its drier natural gas plays will see a reduced capital program, while a growing portion of capital investment will be directed towards oil and liquids-rich development and exploration opportunities. Encana continues to focus on attracting third-party investments to advance development of the Companys reserves and resources.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Encana has hedged approximately 1,955 million cubic feet (MMcf) per day (MMcf/d) of expected 2012 natural gas production using NYMEX fixed price contracts at an average price of $5.80 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf). In addition, Encana has hedged approximately 505 MMcf/d of expected 2013 natural gas production at an average price of $5.24 per Mcf. The Companys Cash Flow and netbacks will benefit from the hedging program during periods of lower prices.
Encana is working to expand the use of natural gas in North America in power generation, transportation and industrial applications. Accessing new natural gas markets, including the export of liquified natural gas (LNG), is also part of this initiative. During 2011, Encana acquired a 30 percent interest in the planned Kitimat LNG export terminal in British Columbia.
Further information on expected 2012 results can be found in Encanas 2012 Corporate Guidance on the Companys website www.encana.com.
Encanas Business
Encana is organized into Divisions which represent the Companys operating and reportable segments as follows:
· |
Canadian Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of natural gas, oil, NGLs and other related activities within Canada. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Greater Sierra in northeast British Columbia, including Horn River; (ii) Cutbank Ridge in Alberta and British Columbia, including Montney; (iii) Bighorn in west central Alberta; and (iv) Coalbed Methane (CBM) in southern Alberta. The Canadian Division also includes the Deep Panuke natural gas project offshore Nova Scotia. |
|
|
· |
USA Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of natural gas, oil, NGLs and other related activities within the U.S. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Jonah in southwest Wyoming; (ii) Piceance in northwest Colorado; (iii) Haynesville in Louisiana; and (iv) Texas, including East Texas and North Texas. |
|
|
· |
Market Optimization is primarily responsible for the sale of the Companys proprietary production. These results are included in the Canadian and USA Divisions. Market optimization activities include third-party purchases and sales of product that provide operational flexibility for transportation commitments, product type, delivery points and customer diversification. These activities are reflected in the Market Optimization segment. |
|
|
· |
Corporate and Other mainly includes unrealized gains or losses recorded on derivative financial instruments. Once amounts are settled, the realized gains and losses are recorded in the operating segment to which the derivative instrument relates. |
Market Optimization sells substantially all of the Companys upstream production to third-party customers. Transactions between segments are based on market values and eliminated on consolidation. Financial information is presented on an after eliminations basis.
Changes in Accounting Policies
The Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, including required 2010 comparative information, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. Encana adopted IFRS for 2011 financial reporting due to Canadian GAAP transitioning to IFRS. For additional information see the Accounting Policies and Estimates section of this MD&A.
In December 2011, Encana announced that it will adopt U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for 2012 financial reporting. As a result, the Company will report its first quarter 2012 results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company believes U.S. GAAP financial results provide information that is more directly comparable with U.S. peer companies. For additional information see the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles section of this MD&A.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Results Overview
Highlights
In the year ended December 31, 2011, Encana reported:
· |
Cash Flow of $4,175 million, Operating Earnings of $398 million and Net Earnings of $128 million. |
|
|
· |
Total average natural gas production volumes of 3,333 MMcf/d, which increased from 3,184 MMcf/d in 2010. |
|
|
· |
Total average oil and NGL production volumes of 24.0 thousand barrels (Mbbls) per day (Mbbls/d), which increased from 22.8 Mbbls/d in 2010. |
|
|
· |
Realized financial natural gas and other commodity hedging gains of $638 million after tax. |
|
|
· |
Average natural gas prices, including financial hedges, of $4.96 per Mcf. Average liquids prices of $85.36 per barrel (bbl). |
|
|
· |
Dividends paid of $0.80 per share. |
Significant developments for the Company during the year ended December 31, 2011 included the following:
· |
Completed planned divestitures for total proceeds of $891 million of Encanas interest in the Cabin natural gas processing plant in British Columbia, the Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant in Colorado and the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets in Colorado. |
|
|
· |
Closed the majority of the sale of its North Texas natural gas producing assets for proceeds of $836 million. On February 7, 2012, Encana received additional proceeds of $91 million. |
|
|
· |
Agreed to sell two natural gas processing plants in the Cutbank Ridge area for approximately C$920 million. The sale closed on February 9, 2012 and the proceeds were received. |
|
|
· |
Entered into negotiations with Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi) to jointly develop certain undeveloped lands owned by Encana. On February 17, 2012, Encana announced that the Company and Mitsubishi had entered into a partnership agreement for the development of Cutbank Ridge lands in British Columbia. Under the agreement, Mitsubishi will invest approximately C$2.9 billion for a 40 percent interest in the partnership. The transaction is expected to close by the end of February 2012. |
|
|
· |
Acquired land and property totaling $515 million, which primarily included acreage with oil and liquids-rich production potential. |
|
|
· |
Entered into deep cut processing arrangements, which will allow the Company to extract additional NGL volumes from its natural gas streams in the Alberta Deep Basin starting in 2012. |
|
|
· |
Acquired a 30 percent interest in the planned Kitimat LNG export terminal in British Columbia. |
|
|
· |
Entered into an agreement to be the sole LNG fueling supplier to a fleet of 200 LNG heavy-duty trucks in Louisiana through its mobile and permanent LNG fueling stations and opened four compressed natural gas fueling stations. |
|
|
· |
Completed a public offering of senior unsecured notes in the U.S. in two series totaling $1.0 billion. Encana also renewed committed revolving bank credit facilities in Canada and the U.S. totaling $4.9 billion, which mature in October 2015. |
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Financial Results
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except per share |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow (1) |
|
$ 4,175 |
|
$ 976 |
|
$ 1,157 |
|
$ 1,087 |
|
$ 955 |
|
|
$ 4,437 |
|
$ 917 |
|
$ 1,131 |
|
$ 1,217 |
|
$ 1,172 |
|
per share diluted |
|
5.66 |
|
1.32 |
|
1.57 |
|
1.47 |
|
1.29 |
|
|
5.98 |
|
1.25 |
|
1.53 |
|
1.65 |
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Earnings (1) |
|
398 |
|
46 |
|
171 |
|
166 |
|
15 |
|
|
598 |
|
50 |
|
85 |
|
66 |
|
397 |
|
per share diluted |
|
0.54 |
|
0.06 |
|
0.23 |
|
0.22 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
0.81 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.12 |
|
0.09 |
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
128 |
|
(246 |
) |
120 |
|
176 |
|
78 |
|
|
1,170 |
|
(469 |
) |
606 |
|
(457 |
) |
1,490 |
|
per share basic |
|
0.17 |
|
(0.33 |
) |
0.16 |
|
0.24 |
|
0.11 |
|
|
1.58 |
|
(0.64 |
) |
0.82 |
|
(0.62 |
) |
1.99 |
|
per share diluted |
|
0.17 |
|
(0.33 |
) |
0.16 |
|
0.21 |
|
0.11 |
|
|
1.55 |
|
(0.64 |
) |
0.80 |
|
(0.62 |
) |
1.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
8,467 |
|
2,461 |
|
2,353 |
|
1,986 |
|
1,667 |
|
|
8,870 |
|
1,431 |
|
2,425 |
|
1,469 |
|
3,545 |
|
Capital Investment |
|
4,578 |
|
989 |
|
1,183 |
|
1,120 |
|
1,286 |
|
|
4,764 |
|
1,426 |
|
1,218 |
|
1,096 |
|
1,024 |
|
Net Acquisitions & (Divestitures) |
|
(1,565 |
) |
(1,538 |
) |
(4 |
) |
108 |
|
(131 |
) |
|
(150 |
) |
83 |
|
(31 |
) |
(84 |
) |
(118 |
) |
Total Assets |
|
33,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
8,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) A non-GAAP measure, which is defined under the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A.
Q4 2011 versus Q4 2010
Cash Flow of $976 million increased $59 million primarily due to higher production volumes, higher liquids prices and higher realized financial hedging gains, partially offset by lower natural gas prices. In the three months ended December 31, 2011:
· Average natural gas production volumes increased 229 MMcf/d to 3,459 MMcf/d from 3,230 MMcf/d in 2010. Average oil and NGL production volumes increased 3.4 Mbbls/d to 23.9 Mbbls/d in 2011 from 20.5 Mbbls/d in 2010.
· Average natural gas prices, excluding financial hedges, were $3.73 per Mcf compared to $3.93 per Mcf in 2010. Average liquids prices, excluding financial hedges, were $85.44 per bbl in 2011 compared to $71.05 per bbl in 2010.
· Realized financial hedging gains were $223 million after tax compared to gains of $209 million after tax in 2010.
Operating Earnings of $46 million decreased $4 million primarily due to lower natural gas prices and higher depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), partially offset by higher production volumes, higher liquids prices and higher realized financial hedging gains.
Net Earnings, a loss of $246 million, increased $223 million primarily due to the after-tax impact of combined realized and unrealized financial hedging gains of $620 million (2010 - $60 million gain reversal) and a gain on divestitures of $88 million (2010 - $12 million loss), partially offset by higher natural gas asset impairments of $854 million (2010 - $371 million). The Companys asset impairments primarily resulted from the decline in forecast natural gas prices. Asset impairments are recognized when the carrying amount of an area exceeds the recoverable amount, as prescribed by IFRS. Net earnings were also impacted by the items discussed in operating earnings.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
2011 versus 2010
Cash Flow of $4,175 million decreased $262 million primarily due to lower natural gas prices, lower realized financial hedging gains and higher transportation expense. These were partially offset by higher production volumes and higher liquids prices. In 2011:
· Average natural gas production volumes increased 149 MMcf/d to 3,333 MMcf/d from 3,184 MMcf/d in 2010. Average oil and NGL production volumes increased 1.2 Mbbls/d to 24.0 Mbbls/d in 2011 from 22.8 Mbbls/d in 2010.
· Average natural gas prices, excluding financial hedges, were $4.17 per Mcf compared to $4.47 per Mcf in 2010. Average liquids prices, excluding financial hedges, were $85.36 per bbl in 2011 compared to $66.72 per bbl in 2010.
· Realized financial hedging gains were $638 million after tax compared to gains of $808 million after tax in 2010.
Operating Earnings of $398 million decreased $200 million primarily due to lower natural gas prices, lower realized financial hedging gains, higher transportation expense and higher DD&A. These were partially offset by higher production volumes, higher liquids prices and lower deferred tax expense.
Net Earnings of $128 million decreased $1,042 million primarily due to the after-tax impact of higher natural gas asset impairments of $854 million (2010 - $371 million), a non-operating foreign exchange loss of $136 million (2010 - $234 million gain) and lower combined realized and unrealized financial hedging gains of $1,238 million (2010 - $1,442 million), partially offset by a higher gain on divestitures of $198 million (2010 - $101 million). The asset impairments primarily resulted from the decline in forecast natural gas prices. Net earnings also decreased due to the items discussed in operating earnings.
Encanas quarterly net earnings are impacted by fluctuations in commodity prices and foreign exchange rates, which can be found below. In addition, combined realized and unrealized hedging gains after tax contributed to the quarterly volatility in 2011 net earnings as follows: Q1 - $50 million; Q2 - $149 million; Q3 - $419 million; and Q4 - $620 million. In 2010, the after-tax gains were as follows: Q1 - $1,037 million; Q2 - $77 million gain reversal; Q3 - $542 million; and Q4 - $60 million gain reversal.
2009 Results
Encanas 2009 financial results were prepared in accordance with previous GAAP. As Encanas IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, comparative information for 2009 has not been restated.
On November 30, 2009, Encana completed a corporate reorganization (the Split Transaction) to split into two independent publicly traded energy companies Encana and Cenovus Energy Inc. (Cenovus). The comparative consolidated results prior to the November 30, 2009 Split Transaction include Cenovus operations. The former Canadian upstream operations transferred to Cenovus were reported as continuing operations under previous GAAP full cost accounting rules. The former U.S. downstream refining assets transferred to Cenovus were reported as discontinued operations.
Encanas December 31, 2009 previous GAAP consolidated financial results, including Cenovus operations, were as follows: total assets of $33,827 million; total debt of $7,768 million; annual revenues, net of royalties of $11,114 million; annual net earnings from continuing operations of $1,830 million, with basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.44; annual consolidated net earnings of $1,862 million, with basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.48.
Encanas 2009 previous GAAP Net Earnings included 11 months of Cenovus operating results and were impacted by:
· Combined realized and unrealized hedging gains of $1,143 million after tax.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
· Average natural gas production volumes of 3,602 MMcf/d and average oil and NGL production volumes of 127.1 Mbbls/d, which included 762 MMcf/d of natural gas and 99.9 Mbbls/d of oil and NGLs from Cenovus operations.
· Average natural gas price, excluding financial hedges, of $3.69 per Mcf and average liquids price, excluding financial hedges, of $49.65 per bbl.
Quarterly Prices and Foreign Exchange Rates
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||
(average for the period) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encana Realized Pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including hedging |
|
$ 4.96 |
|
$ 4.79 |
|
$ 5.01 |
|
$ 5.09 |
|
$ 5.00 |
|
|
$ 5.48 |
|
$ 5.03 |
|
$ 5.27 |
|
$ 5.50 |
|
$ 6.14 |
|
Excluding hedging |
|
4.17 |
|
3.73 |
|
4.32 |
|
4.42 |
|
4.26 |
|
|
4.47 |
|
3.93 |
|
4.19 |
|
4.23 |
|
5.56 |
|
Liquids ($/bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including hedging |
|
85.36 |
|
85.44 |
|
82.43 |
|
92.66 |
|
80.70 |
|
|
66.12 |
|
68.91 |
|
61.79 |
|
67.05 |
|
67.07 |
|
Excluding hedging |
|
85.36 |
|
85.44 |
|
82.43 |
|
92.66 |
|
80.70 |
|
|
66.72 |
|
71.05 |
|
62.15 |
|
66.73 |
|
67.48 |
|
Natural Gas Price Benchmarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX ($/MMBtu) |
|
4.04 |
|
3.55 |
|
4.20 |
|
4.31 |
|
4.11 |
|
|
4.39 |
|
3.80 |
|
4.39 |
|
4.09 |
|
5.30 |
|
AECO (C$/Mcf) |
|
3.67 |
|
3.47 |
|
3.72 |
|
3.74 |
|
3.77 |
|
|
4.13 |
|
3.58 |
|
3.72 |
|
3.86 |
|
5.36 |
|
Rockies (Opal) ($/MMBtu) |
|
3.80 |
|
3.47 |
|
3.90 |
|
3.98 |
|
3.84 |
|
|
3.94 |
|
3.44 |
|
3.53 |
|
3.66 |
|
5.14 |
|
HSC ($/MMBtu) |
|
4.02 |
|
3.49 |
|
4.23 |
|
4.29 |
|
4.06 |
|
|
4.38 |
|
3.78 |
|
4.33 |
|
4.04 |
|
5.36 |
|
Basis Differential ($/MMBtu) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AECO/NYMEX |
|
0.31 |
|
0.17 |
|
0.34 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.29 |
|
|
0.40 |
|
0.28 |
|
0.83 |
|
0.32 |
|
0.19 |
|
Rockies/NYMEX |
|
0.24 |
|
0.08 |
|
0.30 |
|
0.33 |
|
0.27 |
|
|
0.45 |
|
0.36 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.16 |
|
HSC/NYMEX |
|
0.02 |
|
0.06 |
|
(0.03 |
) |
0.02 |
|
0.05 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.06 |
|
0.05 |
|
(0.06 |
) |
Oil Price Benchmark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Texas Intermediate (WTI)($/bbl) |
|
95.11 |
|
94.02 |
|
89.54 |
|
102.34 |
|
94.25 |
|
|
79.55 |
|
85.18 |
|
76.28 |
|
77.99 |
|
78.88 |
|
Foreign Exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S./Canadian Dollar Exchange Rate |
|
1.012 |
|
0.978 |
|
1.020 |
|
1.033 |
|
1.015 |
|
|
0.971 |
|
0.987 |
|
0.962 |
|
0.973 |
|
0.961 |
|
Encanas financial results are influenced by fluctuations in commodity prices, price differentials and the U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate. In 2011, Encanas average realized natural gas price, excluding hedging, reflected lower benchmark prices compared to 2010. Hedging activities contributed an additional $0.79 per Mcf to the average realized gas price in 2011.
As a means of managing commodity price volatility and its impact on cash flows, Encana enters into various financial hedge agreements. Unsettled derivative financial contracts are recorded at the date of the financial statements based on the fair value of the contracts. Changes in fair value result from volatility in forward curves of commodity prices and changes in the balance of unsettled contracts between periods. The changes in fair value are recognized in revenue as unrealized hedging gains and losses. Realized hedging gains and losses are recognized in revenue when derivative financial contracts are settled.
As of December 31, 2011, Encana has hedged approximately 1,955 MMcf/d of expected 2012 natural gas production using NYMEX fixed price contracts at an average price of $5.80 per Mcf. In addition, Encana has hedged approximately 505 MMcf/d of expected 2013 natural gas production at an average price of $5.24 per Mcf. The Companys hedging program helps sustain cash flow during periods of lower prices. For additional information see the Risk Management Financial Risks section of this MD&A.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Reserves Quantities
Since its formation in 2002, Encana has retained independent qualified reserves evaluators (IQREs) to evaluate and prepare reports on 100 percent of the Companys natural gas, oil and NGL reserves annually. The Company has a Reserves Committee of independent Board of Directors members, which reviews the qualifications and appointment of the IQREs. The Reserves Committee also reviews the procedures for providing information to the IQREs. All booked reserves are based upon annual evaluations by the IQREs.
Encanas disclosure of reserves data is in accordance with Canadian securities regulatory requirements, specifically National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101). Encanas 2011 disclosure includes proved reserves quantities before and after royalties employing forecast prices and costs and is available in Encanas Annual Information Form (AIF). The Companys select supplemental 2011 reserves disclosure in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements is available in Encanas AIF.
Proved Reserves Reconciliation
(Forecast Prices and Costs; Before Royalties)
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Oil and NGLs |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
6,755 |
|
9,299 |
|
16,054 |
|
|
61.9 |
|
47.4 |
|
109.3 |
|
16,710 |
|
Extensions |
|
808 |
|
886 |
|
1,694 |
|
|
48.9 |
|
1.8 |
|
50.7 |
|
1,999 |
|
Discoveries |
|
10 |
|
1 |
|
11 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
1.9 |
|
2.7 |
|
27 |
|
Technical revisions |
|
389 |
|
573 |
|
962 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
2.4 |
|
8.9 |
|
1,015 |
|
Economic factors |
|
(234 |
) |
(182 |
) |
(416 |
) |
|
0.2 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.1 |
|
(416 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
82 |
|
28 |
|
110 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
- |
|
0.3 |
|
112 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(187 |
) |
(1,316 |
) |
(1,503 |
) |
|
(6.1 |
) |
(1.8 |
) |
(7.9) |
|
(1,550 |
) |
Production |
|
(556 |
) |
(857 |
) |
(1,413 |
) |
|
(6.0 |
) |
(4.3 |
) |
(10.3) |
|
(1,475 |
) |
December 31, 2011 |
|
7,067 |
|
8,432 |
|
15,499 |
|
|
106.5 |
|
47.3 |
|
153.8 |
|
16,422 |
|
Encanas 2011 natural gas proved reserves before royalties of approximately 15.5 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) decreased by 3.5 percent from 2010 largely due to dispositions and economic factors. Additions of approximately 2.3 Tcf, before acquisitions and divestitures, replaced 159 percent of production before royalties during the year.
Encanas 2011 oil and NGL proved reserves before royalties of approximately 153.8 million barrels (MMbbls) increased by 41 percent over 2010 due to ongoing development and delineation activities. Additions of approximately 62.4 MMbbls, before acquisitions and divestitures, replaced 606 percent of production before royalties during the year.
Proved Reserves Reconciliation
(Forecast Prices and Costs; After Royalties)
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
|
Canada |
|
United |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
6,298 |
|
7,477 |
|
13,775 |
|
|
54.8 |
|
38.5 |
|
93.3 |
|
14,335 |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
849 |
|
1,303 |
|
2,152 |
|
|
17.7 |
|
5.6 |
|
23.3 |
|
2,292 |
|
Revisions (1) |
|
84 |
|
(278 |
) |
(194 |
) |
|
31.8 |
|
(0.8 |
) |
31.0 |
|
(8 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
74 |
|
24 |
|
98 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
100 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(167 |
) |
(1,007 |
) |
(1,174 |
) |
|
(4.8 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
(6.1) |
|
(1,211 |
) |
Production |
|
(531 |
) |
(685 |
) |
(1,216 |
) |
|
(5.3 |
) |
(3.5 |
) |
(8.8) |
|
(1,269 |
) |
December 31, 2011 |
|
6,607 |
|
6,834 |
|
13,441 |
|
|
94.4 |
|
38.6 |
|
133.0 |
|
14,239 |
|
(1) Includes economic factors.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Encanas 2011 natural gas proved reserves after royalties of approximately 13.4 Tcf decreased by 2.4 percent from 2010 due to dispositions and economic factors. Additions of approximately 2.0 Tcf, before acquisitions and divestitures, replaced 161 percent of production after royalties during the year.
Encanas 2011 oil and NGL proved reserves after royalties of approximately 133.0 MMbbls increased by 43 percent over 2010 due to ongoing development and delineation activities. Additions of approximately 54.3 MMbbls, before acquisitions and divestitures, replaced 617 percent of production after royalties during the year.
Forecast Prices
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
| ||||
|
|
Henry Hub ($/MMBtu) |
|
AECO (C$/MMBtu) |
|
WTI ($/bbl) |
|
Edmonton (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Price Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
4.73 |
|
4.35 |
|
79.53 |
|
81.93 |
|
2012 - 2015 |
|
5.33 6.01 |
|
4.94 5.78 |
|
82.65 86.68 |
|
85.88 91.61 |
|
Thereafter |
|
6.18 6.63 |
|
5.97 6.48 |
|
83.72 |
|
88.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Price Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.49 |
|
97.00 |
|
97.96 |
|
2013 - 2021 |
|
4.50 7.17 |
|
4.13 6.58 |
|
100.00 107.56 |
|
101.02 108.73 |
|
Thereafter |
|
+2%/yr |
|
+2%/yr |
|
+2%/yr |
|
+2%/yr |
|
(1) Light Sweet at Edmonton.
Production and Net Capital Investment
Production Volumes (After Royalties)
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||
(average daily) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Produced Gas (MMcf/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
1,454 |
|
1,515 |
|
1,460 |
|
1,445 |
|
1,395 |
|
1,323 |
|
1,395 |
|
1,390 |
|
1,327 |
|
1,177 |
|
USA Division |
|
1,879 |
|
1,944 |
|
1,905 |
|
1,864 |
|
1,801 |
|
1,861 |
|
1,835 |
|
1,791 |
|
1,875 |
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
3,459 |
|
3,365 |
|
3,309 |
|
3,196 |
|
3,184 |
|
3,230 |
|
3,181 |
|
3,202 |
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and NGLs (Mbbls/d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
14.5 |
|
13.9 |
|
15.1 |
|
14.8 |
|
14.3 |
|
13.2 |
|
11.3 |
|
14.3 |
|
13.5 |
|
13.6 |
|
USA Division |
|
9.5 |
|
10.0 |
|
9.3 |
|
9.5 |
|
9.0 |
|
9.6 |
|
9.2 |
|
9.1 |
|
10.1 |
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
23.9 |
|
24.4 |
|
24.3 |
|
23.3 |
|
22.8 |
|
20.5 |
|
23.4 |
|
23.6 |
|
23.7 |
|
In 2011, average natural gas production volumes of 3,333 MMcf/d increased 149 MMcf/d from 2010 and average oil and NGL production volumes of 24.0 Mbbls/d increased 1.2 Mbbls/d from 2010. In the Canadian Division, higher volumes were primarily due to a successful drilling program in the key resource plays. In the USA Division, natural gas volumes were higher primarily due to a successful drilling program in Haynesville, partially offset by net divestitures and natural declines.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Net Capital Investment
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canadian Division |
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
2,206 |
|
USA Division |
|
2,423 |
|
|
2,495 |
| ||
Market Optimization |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
| ||
Corporate & Other |
|
131 |
|
|
61 |
| ||
Capital Investment |
|
4,578 |
|
|
4,764 |
| ||
Acquisitions |
|
515 |
|
|
733 |
| ||
Divestitures |
|
(2,080 |
) |
|
(883 |
) | ||
Net Acquisitions and Divestitures |
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
(150 |
) | ||
Net Capital Investment |
|
$ |
3,013 |
|
|
$ |
4,614 |
|
Capital investment during 2011 was primarily focused on continued development of Encanas North American key resource plays. Capital investment of $4,578 million was lower compared to 2010 primarily due to lower spending in Greater Sierra, Haynesville, Texas, Jonah and CBM, partially offset by increased spending in Piceance.
In 2011, the Company had acquisitions of $410 million in the Canadian Division and $105 million in the USA Division which included land and property purchases that are complementary to existing Company assets. Land acquisitions were focused on acreage with oil and liquids-rich production potential.
Divestitures in 2011 were $350 million in the Canadian Division and $1,730 million in the USA Division. The Canadian Division divestitures include the sale of the Companys interest in the Cabin natural gas processing plant for proceeds of $48 million. The USA Division divestitures include the sales of the Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant for proceeds of $296 million, the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets for proceeds of $547 million and the North Texas natural gas producing assets for proceeds of approximately $836 million. Divestitures in 2010 included the sale of non-core assets. Divestiture amounts are net of amounts recovered for capital expenditures incurred prior to the sale of certain natural gas gathering and processing assets.
With respect to the North Texas assets divestiture, the majority of the sale closed in December. The remaining assets of $116 million and associated liabilities of $1 million were presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements as assets and liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2011. On February 7, 2012, Encana received additional proceeds of $91 million. The remainder of the sale, for proceeds of approximately $24 million, is subject to completion of additional closing conditions and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2012.
In December 2011, Encana announced that it had agreed to sell two natural gas processing plants in the Cutbank Ridge area of British Columbia and Alberta for approximately C$920 million. The assets of $352 million and associated liabilities of $16 million were presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements as assets and liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2011. The sale closed on February 9, 2012 and the proceeds were received. As part of the sale, Encana has entered into an agreement for firm gathering and processing services in the Cutbank Ridge area.
During 2011, Encana entered into negotiations with Mitsubishi to jointly develop certain undeveloped lands owned by Encana. On February 17, 2012, Encana announced that the Company and Mitsubishi had entered into a partnership agreement for the development of Cutbank Ridge lands in British Columbia. Under the agreement, Encana will own 60 percent and Mitsubishi will own 40 percent of the partnership. Mitsubishi will pay approximately C$1.45 billion on closing and will invest approximately C$1.45 billion in addition to its 40 percent of the partnerships future capital investment for a commitment period, which is expected to be about five years, thereby reducing Encanas capital funding commitments to 30 percent of the total expected capital investment over that period. The transaction does not include any of Encanas current Cutbank Ridge production, processing plants, gathering systems or the Companys Alberta landholdings. As at December 31, 2011, assets of $325 million related to this transaction were presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements as assets held for sale. The transaction is expected to close by the end of February 2012.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
In June 2011, Encana ended negotiations with PetroChina International Investment Company, a subsidiary of PetroChina Company Limited (PetroChina), for a proposed joint venture concerning a 50 percent interest in Encanas Cutbank Ridge business assets after the parties were unable to achieve substantial alignment with respect to key elements of the proposed transaction. Negotiations with PetroChina commenced in 2010.
Encana is presently involved in a number of joint venture transactions with counterparties in both Canada and the U.S. These arrangements support the Companys long-term strategy of accelerating the value recognition of its assets. Sharing development costs with third parties enables Encana to advance project development while reducing capital investment, thereby improving project returns.
Divisional Results
Canadian Division
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
Operating Cash Flow |
|
Gas Netback |
|
Oil & NGLs Netback |
| ||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Revenues, Net of Royalties, excluding Hedging |
|
$ 2,507 |
|
$ 2,350 |
|
$ 3.79 |
|
$ 4.10 |
|
$ 85.41 |
|
$ 64.79 |
|
Realized Financial Hedging Gain |
|
365 |
|
479 |
|
0.69 |
|
0.99 |
|
- |
|
(1.04 |
) |
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
15 |
|
8 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.90 |
|
0.44 |
|
Transportation |
|
250 |
|
197 |
|
0.46 |
|
0.40 |
|
0.93 |
|
0.82 |
|
Operating |
|
613 |
|
559 |
|
1.11 |
|
1.09 |
|
1.75 |
|
3.24 |
|
Operating Cash Flow/Netback |
|
$ 1,994 |
|
$ 2,065 |
|
$ 2.89 |
|
$ 3.59 |
|
$ 81.83 |
|
$ 59.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Produced Gas |
|
Oil & NGLs |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Production Volumes After Royalties |
|
|
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
1,323 |
|
14.5 |
|
13.2 |
|
2011 versus 2010
Operating Cash Flow of $1,994 million decreased $71 million primarily due to lower realized natural gas prices, lower financial hedging gains, higher transportation expenses and higher operating expenses, partially offset by higher production volumes and higher realized liquids prices. In 2011:
· Average natural gas production volumes of 1,454 MMcf/d increased 131 MMcf/d and average oil and NGL production volumes of 14.5 Mbbls/d increased 1.3 Mbbls/d. This increased revenues $212 million as a result of a successful drilling program across all key resource plays.
· Lower natural gas prices decreased revenues by $165 million, while higher liquids prices increased revenues by $111 million.
· Realized financial hedging gains were $365 million compared to $479 million in 2010 on a before tax basis.
· Transportation expenses increased $53 million due to higher production volumes.
· Operating expenses increased $54 million due to scheduled plant turnaround costs, higher property tax and a higher U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate, partially offset by lower electricity costs.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
2011 Investment Highlights
During 2011, the Canadian Division had capital investment of $2,022 million, land and property acquisitions of $410 million and divestitures of $350 million. Capital investment focused on the development of key resource plays, while land acquisitions focused on capturing acreage with liquids-rich potential. During 2011, the Canadian Division also entered into an agreement to sell two natural gas processing plants in the Cutbank Ridge area, which closed on February 9, 2012 for proceeds of approximately C$920 million. Also during 2011, Encana commenced negotiations with Mitsubishi which led to the February 17, 2012 announcement that the Company and Mitsubishi had entered into a partnership agreement for the development of Cutbank Ridge undeveloped lands in British Columbia. Under the agreement, Mitsubishi will invest approximately C$2.9 billion for a 40 percent interest in the partnership. The transaction is expected to close by the end of February 2012.
The Canadian Division signed additional deep cut processing arrangements, which will allow the Company to extract additional liquids volumes from its natural gas streams. In 2012, the Company will have access to deep cut processing at the Musreau and Gordondale plants in the Alberta Deep Basin.
Results by Key Area
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
|
Capital |
|
Drilling Activity |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Sierra |
|
260 |
|
230 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.0 |
|
$ 325 |
|
$ 515 |
|
34 |
|
47 |
|
Cutbank Ridge |
|
529 |
|
449 |
|
3.2 |
|
2.0 |
|
527 |
|
506 |
|
55 |
|
62 |
|
Bighorn |
|
230 |
|
220 |
|
3.5 |
|
3.2 |
|
397 |
|
345 |
|
40 |
|
51 |
|
CBM |
|
433 |
|
395 |
|
7.0 |
|
6.0 |
|
354 |
|
428 |
|
596 |
|
1,044 |
|
Key Resource Plays(1) |
|
1,452 |
|
1,294 |
|
14.5 |
|
12.2 |
|
1,603 |
|
1,794 |
|
725 |
|
1,204 |
|
Other |
|
2 |
|
29 |
|
- |
|
1.0 |
|
419 |
|
412 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Total Canadian Division |
|
1,454 |
|
1,323 |
|
14.5 |
|
13.2 |
|
$ 2,022 |
|
$ 2,206 |
|
727 |
|
1,206 |
|
(1) Key resource play areas were realigned in 2011, with comparative information restated.
Other Divisional Expenses
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
$ 9 |
|
$ 4 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,411 |
|
1,286 |
|
Impairments |
|
199 |
|
496 |
|
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(8) |
|
(86) |
|
DD&A for 2011 increased $125 million over 2010 primarily due to higher production volumes.
Impairments of $199 million for 2011 and $496 million for 2010 were related to the Companys Canadian offshore natural gas assets. The impairments resulted primarily from the decline in forecast natural gas prices. The impairments were determined using after-tax discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves based on forecast prices and costs. The cash flows were discounted using 10 percent. The forecast prices were based on benchmark prices disclosed in the Reserves Quantities section of this MD&A. The benchmark prices were adjusted for basis differentials to determine local reference prices, transportation costs and tariffs, heat content and quality.
Net gains on divestitures resulted from non-core asset sales.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
USA Division
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
Operating Cash Flow |
|
Gas Netback |
|
Oil & NGLs Netback |
| ||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, Net of Royalties, excluding Hedging |
|
$ 3,424 |
|
$ 3,577 |
|
$ 4.47 |
|
$ 4.73 |
|
$ 85.28 |
|
$ 69.35 |
|
Realized Financial Hedging Gain |
|
598 |
|
698 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.03 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and mineral taxes |
|
183 |
|
209 |
|
0.23 |
|
0.27 |
|
7.54 |
|
6.69 |
|
Transportation |
|
728 |
|
662 |
|
1.06 |
|
0.97 |
|
0.08 |
|
- |
|
Operating |
|
444 |
|
467 |
|
0.62 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.70 |
|
- |
|
Operating Cash Flow/Netback |
|
$ 2,667 |
|
$ 2,937 |
|
$ 3.43 |
|
$ 3.94 |
|
$ 76.96 |
|
$ 62.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Produced Gas |
|
Oil & NGLs |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Production Volumes After Royalties |
|
|
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
1,861 |
|
9.5 |
|
9.6 |
|
2011 versus 2010
Operating Cash Flow of $2,667 million decreased $270 million primarily due to lower realized natural gas prices, lower financial hedging gains and higher transportation expenses, partially offset by higher realized liquids prices and higher natural gas production volumes. In 2011:
· Average natural gas production volumes of 1,879 MMcf/d increased 18 MMcf/d, which increased revenues by $31 million. The increase in volumes was primarily due to a successful drilling program in Haynesville, partially offset by net divestitures and natural declines.
· Lower natural gas prices decreased revenues by $179 million, while higher liquids prices increased revenues by $56 million.
· Realized financial hedging gains were $598 million compared to $698 million in 2010 on a before tax basis.
· Transportation expenses increased $66 million due to transporting volumes further to obtain higher price realizations.
2011 Investment Highlights
During 2011, the USA Division had capital investment of $2,423 million, land and property acquisitions of $105 million and divestitures of $1,730 million. Capital investment focused on the development of the Haynesville and Piceance key resource plays, while land acquisitions focused on capturing acreage with liquids-rich potential. The USA Division divestitures included the sales of the Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant, the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets and the majority of the North Texas natural gas producing assets.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Results by Key Area
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil and NGLs |
|
Capital |
|
Drilling Activity |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah |
|
471 |
|
531 |
|
4.3 |
|
4.6 |
|
$ 275 |
|
$ 374 |
|
71 |
|
112 |
|
Piceance |
|
435 |
|
446 |
|
1.9 |
|
2.0 |
|
441 |
|
224 |
|
141 |
|
125 |
|
Texas |
|
376 |
|
487 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
310 |
|
418 |
|
41 |
|
52 |
|
Haynesville |
|
508 |
|
287 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,018 |
|
1,141 |
|
87 |
|
100 |
|
Key Resource Plays(1) |
|
1,790 |
|
1,751 |
|
6.5 |
|
6.8 |
|
2,044 |
|
2,157 |
|
340 |
|
389 |
|
Other |
|
89 |
|
110 |
|
3.0 |
|
2.8 |
|
379 |
|
338 |
|
62 |
|
59 |
|
Total USA Division |
|
1,879 |
|
1,861 |
|
9.5 |
|
9.6 |
|
$ 2,423 |
|
$ 2,495 |
|
402 |
|
448 |
|
(1) Key resource play areas were realigned in 2011, with comparative information restated.
Other Divisional Expenses
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
$ 133 |
|
$ 51 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,922 |
|
1,954 |
|
Impairments |
|
1,105 |
|
- |
|
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(323) |
|
(53) |
|
Exploration and evaluation expense for 2011 includes $122 million of unrecoverable costs primarily related to the West Texas exploration and evaluation assets.
DD&A for 2011 decreased $32 million from 2010 primarily due to divestitures of non-core assets, partially offset by higher production.
Impairments of $1,105 million for 2011 (2010 - nil) were primarily related to the Companys East Texas natural gas producing assets. The impairment resulted from the decline in forecast natural gas prices and a change in future development plans. The impairment was determined using after-tax discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves based on forecast prices and costs. The cash flows were discounted using 10 percent. The forecast prices were based on benchmark prices disclosed in the Reserves Quantities section of this MD&A. The benchmark prices were adjusted for basis differentials to determine local reference prices, transportation costs and tariffs, heat content and quality.
The net gain on divestitures in 2011 of $323 million primarily includes the gains and losses on the Companys divestitures of the Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant, the South Piceance natural gas gathering assets and the North Texas natural gas producing assets.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Market Optimization
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ 703 |
|
$ 797 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
40 |
|
34 |
|
Purchased product |
|
635 |
|
739 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
12 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
$ 16 |
|
$ 13 |
|
Market Optimization revenues and purchased product expenses relate to activities that provide operational flexibility for transportation commitments, product type, delivery points and customer diversification.
Revenues and purchased product expenses decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to lower commodity prices and lower volumes required for optimization.
Corporate and Other
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ 870 |
|
$ 969 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
(23) |
|
- |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
- |
|
10 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
78 |
|
67 |
|
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
5 |
|
(2) |
|
|
|
$ 810 |
|
$ 894 |
|
Revenues primarily represent unrealized hedging gains or losses related to natural gas financial contracts which result from the volatility in forward curves of commodity prices and changes in the balance of unsettled contracts between periods. Operating expenses primarily reflect unrealized financial hedging gains or losses related to the Companys power contracts. DD&A includes amortization of corporate assets, such as computer equipment, office furniture and leasehold improvements.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Other Operating Results
Expenses
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
$ 51 |
|
$ 48 |
|
Administrative |
|
348 |
|
361 |
|
Interest |
|
468 |
|
501 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
170 |
|
(250) |
|
|
|
$ 1,037 |
|
$ 660 |
|
Foreign exchange gains and losses result from the impact of the fluctuations in the Canadian to U.S. dollar exchange rate. Foreign exchange gains and losses arise from the revaluation and settlement of U.S. dollar long-term debt issued from Canada, settlement of intercompany transactions and revaluations of monetary assets and liabilities.
Income Tax
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Income Tax (Recovery) |
|
$ (174) |
|
$ (213) |
|
Deferred Income Tax |
|
48 |
|
640 |
|
Income Tax Expense (Recovery) |
|
$ (126) |
|
$ 427 |
|
In 2011, current income tax was a recovery of $174 million compared to a recovery of $213 million in 2010. The current income tax recovery for 2011 and 2010 is primarily due to the carry back of tax losses to prior years. The lower recovery in 2011 primarily results from current year divestitures, partially offset by lower Cash Flow resulting from lower natural gas prices and lower realized hedging gains.
Total income tax expense in 2011 decreased $553 million from 2010 due to lower net earnings before tax primarily resulting from the asset impairments, lower natural gas prices, lower combined realized and unrealized hedging gains and a foreign exchange loss.
Encanas effective tax rate in any period is a function of total income tax to the amount of net earnings before income tax for the period. The effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory tax rate due to permanent differences, jurisdictional tax rates, benefits of loss carrybacks and adjustments to estimates. Permanent differences primarily include the non-taxable portion of capital gains or losses, international financing and the effect of changes in legislation.
Tax interpretations, regulations and legislation in the various jurisdictions in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate are subject to change. As a result, there are tax matters under review. The Company believes that the provision for taxes is adequate.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
($ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Cash From (Used In) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating activities |
|
$ |
4,043 |
|
|
$ |
2,363 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(3,725 |
) |
|
(4,727 |
) | ||
Financing activities |
|
(214 |
) |
|
(1,284 |
) | ||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash and cash equivalents held in foreign currency |
|
(1 |
) |
|
2 |
| ||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
(3,646 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
Operating Activities
Net cash from operating activities in 2011 of $4,043 million increased $1,680 million compared to 2010. The increase is a result of the Cash Flow variances discussed in the Financial Results section of this MD&A, as well as the changes in non-cash working capital. In 2011, the net change in non-cash working capital was a deficit of $38 million compared to a deficit of $1,990 million in 2010. The 2010 net change in non-cash working capital reflected a one time tax payment of $1,775 million related to the wind-up of the Companys Canadian oil and gas partnership.
The Company had a working capital surplus of $2,107 million at December 31, 2011 compared to a surplus of $20 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in working capital is primarily the result of higher net risk management assets of $1,141 million and the net assets held for sale of $776 million discussed in the Net Capital Investment section of this MD&A.
At December 31, 2011, working capital also included cash and cash equivalents of $732 million and current debt of $492 million compared to $629 million and $500 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010. Encana expects that it will continue to meet the payment terms of its suppliers.
Investing Activities
Net cash used for investing activities in 2011 of $3,725 million decreased $1,002 million compared to 2010. The decrease in investing activities primarily results from lower capital expenditures and higher divestiture proceeds, which are discussed further in the Net Capital Investment section of this MD&A.
Financing Activities
Current and Long-Term Debt
Encanas debt totaled $8,083 million at December 31, 2011 and $7,629 million at December 31, 2010.
Encanas current debt at December 31, 2011 was $492 million compared to $500 million at December 31, 2010. Current debt included current portion of long-term debt. There were no outstanding balances under the Companys commercial paper or revolving credit facilities at December 31, 2011.
Long-term debt of $7,591 million at December 31, 2011 increased from $7,129 million at December 31, 2010. On November 14, 2011, Encana completed a public offering in the U.S. of senior unsecured notes in two series totaling $1.0 billion. The first series of $600 million have a coupon rate of 3.90 percent and mature November 15, 2021, and the second series of $400 million have a coupon rate of 5.15 percent and mature November 15, 2041.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
The proceeds of the offering were used to repay a portion of Encanas commercial paper indebtedness, a portion of which was incurred to repay Encanas $500 million 6.30 percent notes that matured November 1, 2011.
Credit Facilities and Shelf Prospectuses
Encana maintains two committed revolving bank credit facilities and a Canadian and a U.S. dollar shelf prospectus.
As at December 31, 2011, Encana had available unused committed revolving bank credit facilities of $4.9 billion.
· On October 12, 2011, Encana renewed its revolving bank credit facility for C$4.0 billion ($3.9 billion) that remains committed through October 2015, of which C$4.0 billion ($3.9 billion) remains unused.
· On October 20, 2011, one of Encanas U.S. subsidiaries renewed its revolving bank credit facility for $1.0 billion that remains committed through October 2015, of which $999 million remains unused.
As at December 31, 2011, Encana had available unused capacity under shelf prospectuses for up to $5.0 billion.
· On May 18, 2011, Encana renewed a shelf prospectus whereby it may issue from time to time up to C$2.0 billion, or the equivalent in foreign currencies, of debt securities in Canada. At December 31, 2011, C$2.0 billion ($2.0 billion) of the shelf prospectus remained unutilized, the availability of which is dependent upon market conditions. The shelf prospectus expires in June 2013.
· Encana has in place a shelf prospectus whereby it may issue from time to time up to $4.0 billion, or the equivalent in foreign currencies, of debt securities in the U.S. On November 14, 2011, Encana utilized the shelf prospectus to issue senior unsecured notes totaling $1.0 billion in the U.S. At December 31, 2011, $3.0 billion of the shelf prospectus remained unutilized, the availability of which is dependent upon market conditions. The shelf prospectus expires in May 2012.
Encana is currently in compliance with, and expects that it will continue to be in compliance with, all financial covenants under its credit facility agreements.
Normal Course Issuer Bid
In 2011 and 2010, Encana had approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange to purchase common shares under a Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB). Encana was entitled to purchase, for cancellation, up to 36.8 million common shares under the most recent NCIB which commenced on December 14, 2010 and expired on December 13, 2011. The Company has not renewed its NCIB and did not purchase any common shares during 2011. During 2010, the Company purchased approximately 15.4 million common shares for total consideration of approximately $499 million.
Dividends
Encana pays quarterly dividends to shareholders at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Dividend payments in 2011 were $588 million, or $0.80 per share (2010 - $590 million or $0.80 per share). The Companys quarterly dividend payment in 2011 and 2010 was $0.20 per share. For the first three quarters of 2009, Encana paid a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Following the Split Transaction in the fourth quarter of 2009, Encana paid a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share.
On February 16, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.20 per common share payable on March 30, 2012.
Outstanding Share Data
As at December 31, 2011, Encana had 736.3 million common shares outstanding (2010 - 736.3 million). As at February 21, 2012, Encana had 736.3 million common shares outstanding.
Eligible employees have been granted stock options to purchase common shares in accordance with Encanas Employee Stock Option Plan. As at December 31, 2011, there were approximately 37.7 million outstanding stock options with associated Tandem Stock Appreciation Rights (TSARs) attached (21.2 million exercisable).
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
A TSAR gives the holder the conditional right to receive an Encana common share or a cash payment equal to the excess of the market price of Encanas common share at the time of exercise over the exercise price of the TSAR. The exercise of a TSAR for a cash payment does not result in the issuance of any Encana common shares and therefore has no dilutive effect. Historically, most holders of these options have elected to exercise their stock options as a TSAR in exchange for a cash payment.
In 2011, Restricted Share Units (RSUs) were granted to eligible employees to receive Encana common shares, or the cash equivalent, as determined by Encana, and in accordance with the RSU Plan for Employees of Encana and RSU Grant Agreement. The value of one RSU is notionally equivalent to one Encana common share. As at December 31, 2011, there were approximately 3.3 million outstanding RSUs which vest three years from the date granted. The receipt of a cash payment does not result in the issuance of any Encana common shares and therefore has no dilutive effect. The Company intends to settle vested RSUs in cash on the vesting date.
Financial Metrics
In managing its capital structure, the Company monitors several non-GAAP financial metrics as indicators of its overall financial strength. The Companys capital structure consists of shareholders equity plus debt, defined as current and long-term debt. To manage the capital structure, the Company may adjust capital spending, adjust dividends paid to shareholders, purchase shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bids, issue new shares, issue new debt or repay existing debt. The key metrics the Company currently monitors are below.
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow (1) |
|
1.8x |
|
1.6x |
|
Debt to Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
|
1.9x |
|
1.6x |
|
Debt to Capitalization (1) |
|
33% |
|
31% |
|
(1) A non-GAAP measure, which is defined under the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies |
Contractual Obligations
The following table outlines the contractual obligations and commitments of the Company.
|
Expected Future Payments | |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, undiscounted) |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Long-Term Debt (1) |
|
$ |
492 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
6,137 |
|
$ |
8,129 |
|
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
45 |
|
47 |
|
46 |
|
39 |
|
34 |
|
4,142 |
|
4,353 |
| |||||||
Other Long-Term Obligations |
|
38 |
|
90 |
|
91 |
|
92 |
|
93 |
|
2,112 |
|
2,516 |
| |||||||
Finance Leases |
|
45 |
|
89 |
|
89 |
|
89 |
|
89 |
|
310 |
|
711 |
| |||||||
Obligations (2) |
|
620 |
|
726 |
|
1,226 |
|
220 |
|
216 |
|
12,701 |
|
15,709 |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Transportation and Processing |
|
747 |
|
795 |
|
856 |
|
860 |
|
767 |
|
5,053 |
|
9,078 |
| |||||||
Purchases of Goods and Services |
|
531 |
|
198 |
|
128 |
|
87 |
|
46 |
|
72 |
|
1,062 |
| |||||||
Operating Leases |
|
52 |
|
47 |
|
44 |
|
39 |
|
33 |
|
94 |
|
309 |
| |||||||
Capital Commitments |
|
166 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
7 |
|
80 |
|
275 |
| |||||||
Commitments |
|
1,496 |
|
1,047 |
|
1,035 |
|
994 |
|
853 |
|
5,299 |
|
10,724 |
| |||||||
Total Contractual Obligations |
|
$ |
2,116 |
|
$ |
1,773 |
|
$ |
2,261 |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
$ |
26,433 |
|
Sublease Recoveries |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
(45 |
) |
$ |
(45 |
) |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
(1,045 |
) |
$ |
(1,252 |
) |
(1) Principal component only. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) The Company has recorded $11,088 million in liabilities related to these obligations.
Other Long-Term Obligations relates to the 25 year lease agreement with a third party developer for The Bow office project, which has been recorded as an asset under construction with a corresponding liability of $1,309 million. During 2012, Encana will assume occupancy of The Bow office premises, at which time the Company will commence payments to the third party developer. Over the 25 year term of the agreement, Encana will depreciate The Bow asset and reduce the accrued liability. At the conclusion of the 25 year term, the remaining asset and corresponding liability will be derecognized. In conjunction with the Split Transaction, Encana has subleased part of The Bow office space to Cenovus. Sublease recoveries include the sublease costs expected to be recovered from Cenovus.
Finance Leases includes the commitment related to the Deep Panuke Production Field Centre, which has been recorded as an asset under construction with a corresponding liability of $607 million. Upon commencement of operations in 2012, Encana will recognize the production facility as a finance lease. Encanas undiscounted contractual payments are limited to $711 million ($497 million discounted).
In addition to the Total Contractual Obligations disclosed above, Encana has made commitments related to its risk management program and the Company has an obligation to fund its defined benefit pension and other post-employment benefit plans. Further information can be found in Notes 22 and 21, respectively, to the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company expects to fund its 2012 commitments from Cash Flow.
Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
Encana is involved in various legal claims associated with the normal course of operations and believes it has made adequate provision for such legal claims.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Risk Management |
Encanas business, prospects, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows, and in some cases its reputation, are impacted by risks that are categorized as follows:
· financial risks;
· operational risks; and
· safety, environmental and regulatory risks.
Issues affecting, or with the potential to affect, Encanas reputation are generally of a strategic nature or emerging issues that can be identified early and then managed, but occasionally include unforeseen issues that arise unexpectedly and must be managed on an urgent basis. Encana takes a proactive approach to the identification and management of issues that affect the Companys reputation and has established consistent and clear policies, procedures, guidelines and responsibilities for identifying and managing these issues.
Encana continues to implement its business model of focusing on developing low-risk and low-cost long-life resource plays, which allows the Company to respond well to market uncertainties. Management adjusts financial and operational risk strategies to proactively respond to changing economic conditions and to mitigate or reduce risk.
Financial Risks
Encana defines financial risks as the risk of loss or lost opportunity resulting from financial management and market conditions that could have a positive or negative impact on Encanas business.
Financial risks include, but are not limited to:
· market pricing of natural gas and liquids;
· credit and liquidity;
· foreign exchange rates; and
· interest rates.
Encana partially mitigates its exposure to financial risks through the use of various financial instruments and physical contracts. The use of derivative financial instruments is governed under formal policies and is subject to limits established by the Board of Directors. All derivative financial agreements are with major financial institutions in Canada and the U.S. or with counterparties having investment grade credit ratings.
Encana has in place policies and procedures with respect to the required documentation and approvals for the use of derivative financial instruments and specifically ties their use, in the case of commodities, to the mitigation of price risk to achieve investment returns and growth objectives, while maintaining prescribed financial metrics.
To partially mitigate the natural gas commodity price risk, the Company may enter into transactions that fix or set a floor on prices. To help protect against regional natural gas price differentials, Encana executes transactions to manage the price differentials between its production areas and various sales points. Further information, including the details of Encanas financial instruments as at December 31, 2011, is disclosed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Counterparty and credit risks are regularly and proactively managed. A substantial portion of Encanas credit exposure is with customers in the oil and gas industry or financial institutions. This credit exposure is mitigated through the use of Board-approved credit policies governing the Companys credit portfolio including credit practices that limit transactions and grant payment terms according to counterparties credit quality.
The Company manages liquidity risk using cash and debt management programs. The Company has access to cash equivalents and a wide range of funding alternatives at competitive rates through commercial paper, debt capital markets and committed revolving bank credit facilities.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Encana closely monitors the Companys ability to access cost effective credit and ensures that sufficient liquidity is in place to fund capital expenditures and dividend payments. The Company also minimizes its liquidity risk by managing its capital structure. In managing the capital structure, the Company may adjust capital spending, adjust dividends paid to shareholders, purchase shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bids, issue new shares, issue new debt or repay existing debt.
As a means of mitigating the exposure to fluctuations in the U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate, Encana may enter into foreign exchange contracts. Realized gains or losses on these contracts are recognized on settlement. By maintaining U.S. and Canadian operations, Encana has a natural hedge to some foreign exchange exposure.
Encana also maintains a mix of both U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar debt, which helps to offset the exposure to the fluctuations in the U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate. In addition to direct issuance of U.S. dollar denominated debt, the Company may enter into cross currency swaps on a portion of its debt as a means of managing the U.S./Canadian dollar debt mix.
The Company may partially mitigate its exposure to interest rate changes by holding a mix of both fixed and floating rate debt. Encana may enter into interest rate swap transactions from time to time as an additional means of managing the fixed/floating rate debt portfolio mix.
Operational Risks
Operational risks are defined as the risk of loss or lost opportunity resulting from the following:
· reserves and resources replacement;
· capital activities; and
· operating activities.
The Companys ability to operate, generate cash flows, complete projects, and value reserves and resources is dependent on financial risks, including commodity prices mentioned above, continued market demand for its products and other risk factors outside of its control, which include: general business and market conditions; economic recessions and financial market turmoil; the overall state of the capital markets, including investor appetite for investments in the oil and gas industry generally and the Companys securities in particular; the ability to secure and maintain cost effective financing for its commitments; legislative, environmental and regulatory matters; unexpected cost increases; royalties; taxes; the availability of drilling and other equipment; the ability to access lands; the ability to access water for hydraulic fracturing operations; weather; the availability of processing capacity; the availability and proximity of pipeline capacity; technology failures; accidents; the availability of skilled labour; and reservoir quality. If Encana fails to acquire or find additional natural gas reserves and resources, its reserves, resources and production will decline materially from their current levels and, therefore, its cash flows are highly dependent upon successfully exploiting current reserves and resources and acquiring, discovering or developing additional reserves and resources.
To mitigate these risks, as part of the capital approval process, the Companys projects are evaluated on a fully risked basis, including geological risk and engineering risk. In addition, the asset teams undertake a thorough review of previous capital programs to identify key learnings, which often include operational issues that positively and negatively impact project results. Mitigation plans are developed for the operational issues that had a negative impact on results. These mitigation plans are then incorporated into the current year plan for the project. On an annual basis, these results are analyzed for Encanas capital program with the results and identified learnings shared across the Company.
A peer review process is used to ensure that capital projects are appropriately risked and that knowledge is shared across the Company. Peer reviews are undertaken primarily for exploration projects and early stage resource plays, although they may occur for any type of project.
When making operating and investing decisions, Encanas business model allows flexibility in capital allocation to optimize investments focused on project returns, long-term value creation and risk mitigation. Encana also mitigates operational risks through a number of other policies, systems and processes as well as by maintaining a comprehensive insurance program.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Risks
The Company is committed to safety in its operations and has high regard for the environment and stakeholders, including regulators. The Companys business is subject to all of the operating risks normally associated with the exploration for, development of and production of natural gas, oil and NGLs and the operation of midstream facilities. When assessing the materiality of the environmental risk factors, Encana takes into account a number of qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to, financial, operational, reputational and regulatory aspects of the identified risk factor. These risks are managed by executing policies and standards that are designed to comply with or exceed government regulations and industry standards. In addition, Encana maintains a system that identifies, assesses and controls safety, security and environmental risk and requires regular reporting to Senior Management and the Board of Directors. The Corporate Responsibility, Environment, Health & Safety Committee of Encanas Board of Directors provides recommended environmental policies for approval by Encanas Board of Directors and oversees compliance with government laws and regulations. Monitoring and reporting programs for environmental, health and safety performance in day-to-day operations, as well as inspections and audits, are designed to provide assurance that environmental and regulatory standards are met. Contingency plans are in place for a timely response to environmental events and remediation/reclamation strategies are utilized to restore the environment.
Encanas operations are subject to regulation and intervention by governments that can affect or prohibit the drilling, completion, including hydraulic fracturing and tie-in of wells, production, the construction or expansion of facilities and the operation and abandonment of fields. Changes in government regulation could impact the Companys existing and planned projects as well as impose a cost of compliance.
One of the processes Encana monitors relates to hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing is used throughout the oil and gas industry where fracturing fluids are utilized to develop the reservoir. This process has been used in the oil and gas industry for approximately 60 years. Encana uses multiple techniques to fully understand the effect of each hydraulic fracturing operation it conducts. In all Encana operations, rigorous water management and protection is an essential part of this process.
Hydraulic fracturing processes are strictly regulated by various state and provincial government agencies. Encana meets, and in many cases exceeds, the requirements set out by the regulators. The U.S. and Canadian federal and certain U.S. state and Canadian provincial governments are currently reviewing certain aspects of the scientific, regulatory and policy framework under which hydraulic fracturing operations are conducted. At present, most of these governments are primarily engaged in the collection, review and assessment of technical information regarding the hydraulic fracturing process and, with the exception of increased chemical disclosure requirements in many of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, have not provided specific details with respect to any significant actual, proposed or contemplated changes to the hydraulic fracturing regulatory construct. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) has commenced a study of the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing, including the impacts on drinking water sources and public health. The EPA has also released a draft report outlining the results of its groundwater study at Encanas Pavillion natural gas field in Wyoming. Although the EPAs draft report has not been subject to a qualified, third-party, scientific verification, any implication of a potential connection between hydraulic fracturing and groundwater quality could impact the Companys existing and planned projects as well as impose a cost of compliance.
Encana is committed to and supports the disclosure of hydraulic fracturing chemical information. Encana participates in the FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry in the U.S. and will participate in the newly announced Canadian version of the Registry. Encana works collaboratively with industry peers, trade associations, fluid suppliers and regulators to identify, develop and advance responsible hydraulic fracturing best practices. More information on hydraulic fracturing can be accessed on the Companys website at www.encana.com.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Climate Change
A number of federal, provincial and state governments have announced intentions to regulate greenhouse gases (GHG) and certain other air emissions. While some jurisdictions have provided details on these regulations, it is anticipated that other jurisdictions will announce emission reduction plans in the future. As these federal and regional programs are under development, Encana is unable to predict the total impact of the potential regulations upon its business. Therefore, it is possible that the Company could face increases in operating and capital costs in order to comply with GHG emissions legislation. However, Encana will continue to work with governments to develop an approach to deal with climate change issues that protects the industrys competitiveness, limits the cost and administrative burden of compliance and supports continued investment in the sector.
The Alberta Government has set targets for GHG emission reductions. In March 2007, regulations were amended to require facilities that emit more than 100,000 tonnes of GHG emissions per year to reduce their emissions intensity by 12 percent from a regulated baseline starting July 1, 2007. To comply, companies can make operating improvements, purchase carbon offsets or make a C$15 per tonne contribution to an Alberta Climate Change and Emissions Management Fund. In Alberta, Encana has one facility covered under the emissions regulations. The forecast cost of carbon associated with the Alberta regulations is not material to Encana at this time and is being actively managed.
In British Columbia, effective July 1, 2008, a revenue neutral carbon tax was applied to virtually all fossil fuels, including diesel, natural gas, coal, propane and home heating fuel. The tax applies to combustion emissions and to the purchase or use of fossil fuels within the province. The rate started at C$10 per tonne of carbon equivalent emissions, was C$20 per tonne in 2011 and rises to C$30 per tonne by 2012. The forecast cost of carbon associated with the British Columbia regulations is not material to Encana at this time and is being actively managed.
The American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACESA) was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in June 2009 but failed to gain sufficient support in the U.S. Senate in 2010. The ACESA proposed climate change legislation which would have established a GHG cap-and-trade system and provided incentives for the development of renewable energy. Subsequently, the current U.S. Administration has directed the U.S. EPA to exercise new authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate GHG emissions. Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to set industry-specific standards for new and existing sources that emit GHGs above a certain threshold. To date, the EPA has made no significant announcements pertaining to the development or implementation of industry-specific standards related to oil and gas exploration and production. Encana will continue to monitor these developments during 2012.
Encana intends to continue its activity to reduce its emissions intensity and improve its energy efficiency. The Companys efforts with respect to emissions management are founded on the following key elements:
· significant production weighting in natural gas;
· focus on energy efficiency and the development of technology to reduce GHG emissions; and
· involvement in the creation of industry best practices.
Encanas strategy for addressing the implications of emerging carbon regulations is proactive and is composed of three principal elements:
· Manage Existing Costs. When regulations are implemented, a cost is placed on Encanas emissions (or a portion thereof) and while these are not material at this stage, they are being actively managed to ensure compliance. Factors such as effective emissions tracking and attention to fuel consumption help to support and drive the Companys focus on cost reduction.
· Respond to Price Signals. As regulatory regimes for GHGs develop in the jurisdictions where Encana works, inevitably price signals begin to emerge. The Company maintains an Environmental Efficiency Initiative in an effort to improve the energy efficiency of its operations. The price of potential carbon reductions plays a role in the economics of the projects that are implemented. In response to the anticipated price of carbon, Encana is also attempting, where appropriate, to realize the associated value of its reduction projects.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
· Anticipate Future Carbon Constrained Scenarios. Encana continues to work with governments, academics and industry leaders to develop and respond to emerging GHG regulations. By continuing to stay engaged in the debate on the most appropriate means to regulate these emissions, the Company gains useful knowledge that allows it to explore different strategies for managing its emissions and costs. These scenarios influence Encanas long-range planning and its analyses on the implications of regulatory trends.
Encana monitors developments in emerging climate change policy and legislation, and considers the associated costs of carbon in its strategic planning. Management and the Board of Directors review the impact of a variety of carbon constrained scenarios on its strategy, with a current price range from approximately $10 to $50 per tonne of emissions applied to a range of emissions coverage levels. Encana also examines the impact of carbon regulation on its major projects. Although uncertainty remains regarding potential future emissions regulation, Encanas plan is to continue to assess and evaluate the cost of carbon relative to its investments across a range of scenarios.
Encana recognizes that there is a cost associated with carbon emissions. Encana is confident that GHG regulations and the cost of carbon at various price levels have been adequately considered as part of its business planning and scenarios analyses. Encana believes that the resource play strategy is an effective way to develop the resource, generate shareholder returns and coordinate overall environmental objectives with respect to carbon, air emissions, water and land. Encana is committed to transparency with its stakeholders and will keep them apprised of how these issues affect operations. Additional detail on Encanas GHG emissions is available in the Corporate Responsibility Report that is available on the Companys website at www.encana.com.
Accounting Policies and Estimates |
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
On January 1, 2011, Encana adopted IFRS for financial reporting purposes, using a transition date of January 1, 2010. The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, including comparative information, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. As Encanas Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared under IFRS for the first time, the Company followed IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. Prior to 2011, the Company prepared its financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP, or previous GAAP. The adoption of IFRS has not had a material impact on the Companys operations, strategic decisions, Cash Flow and capital expenditures.
The Companys IFRS accounting policies are provided in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presents reconciliations between the Companys 2010 previous GAAP results and the 2010 IFRS results.
The following provides summary reconciliations of Encanas 2010 previous GAAP to IFRS results, along with a discussion of the significant IFRS accounting policy changes.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Summary Net Earnings Reconciliation Previous GAAP to IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings Previous GAAP |
|
$ 1,499 |
|
$ (42 |
) |
$ 569 |
|
$ (505 |
) |
$ 1,477 |
|
After-tax (addition) / deduction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
27 |
|
26 |
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
60 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
15 |
|
10 |
|
Impairments |
|
371 |
|
371 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Divestitures (gain) loss |
|
(101 |
) |
12 |
|
(51 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(34 |
) |
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Compensation |
|
5 |
|
- |
|
(6 |
) |
1 |
|
10 |
|
Foreign currency |
|
(34 |
) |
- |
|
1 |
|
(35 |
) |
- |
|
|
|
329 |
|
427 |
|
(37 |
) |
(48 |
) |
(13 |
) |
Net Earnings IFRS |
|
$ 1,170 |
|
$ (469 |
) |
$ 606 |
|
$ (457 |
) |
$ 1,490 |
|
Operating Earnings Reconciliation Previous GAAP to IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Earnings(1) Previous GAAP |
|
$ 665 |
|
$ 68 |
|
$ 98 |
|
$ 81 |
|
$ 418 |
|
After-tax (addition) / deduction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
60 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
15 |
|
10 |
|
Asset retirement obligation accretion |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Compensation |
|
5 |
|
- |
|
(6 |
) |
1 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
18 |
|
13 |
|
15 |
|
21 |
|
Operating Earnings(1) IFRS |
|
$ 598 |
|
$ 50 |
|
$ 85 |
|
$ 66 |
|
$ 397 |
|
(1) A non-GAAP measure, which is defined under the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A.
Financial Metrics Previous GAAP and IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous GAAP |
|
$ 4,439 |
|
$ 917 |
|
$ 1,132 |
|
$ 1,217 |
|
$ 1,173 |
|
IFRS |
|
4,437 |
|
917 |
|
1,131 |
|
1,217 |
|
1,172 |
|
Capital Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous GAAP |
|
$ 4,773 |
|
$ 1,427 |
|
$ 1,227 |
|
$ 1,099 |
|
$ 1,020 |
|
IFRS |
|
4,764 |
|
1,426 |
|
1,218 |
|
1,096 |
|
1,024 |
|
Debt to Capitalization (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous GAAP |
|
31% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS |
|
31% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) A non-GAAP measure, which is defined under the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
IFRS Accounting Policy Changes
The following discussion explains the significant differences between Encanas previous GAAP accounting policies and those applied by the Company under IFRS. IFRS policies have been retrospectively and consistently applied except where specific IFRS 1 optional and mandatory exemptions permitted an alternative treatment upon transition to IFRS for first-time adopters.
The most significant changes to the Companys accounting policies relate to the accounting for upstream costs. Under previous GAAP, Encana followed the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) guideline on full cost accounting in which all costs directly associated with the acquisition of, the exploration for, and the development of natural gas, oil and NGL reserves were capitalized on a country-by-country cost centre basis. Costs accumulated within each country cost centre were depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves determined using estimated future prices and costs. Upon transition to IFRS, the Company was required to adopt new accounting policies for upstream activities, including exploration and evaluation costs and development costs.
Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation costs are those expenditures for an area where technical feasibility and commercial viability has not yet been determined. Development costs include those expenditures for areas where technical feasibility and commercial viability has been determined. Encana adopted the IFRS 1 exemption whereby the Company deemed its January 1, 2010 IFRS upstream asset costs to be equal to its previous GAAP historical upstream property, plant and equipment net book value. Accordingly, exploration and evaluation costs were deemed equal to the unproved properties balance and the development costs were deemed equal to the upstream full cost pool balance. Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation costs are presented as exploration and evaluation assets and development costs are presented within property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Exploration and Evaluation
Exploration and evaluation assets at January 1, 2010 were deemed to be $1,885 million, representing the unproved properties balance under previous GAAP. This resulted in a reclassification of $1,885 million from property, plant and equipment to exploration and evaluation assets on Encanas Consolidated Balance Sheet as at January 1, 2010. As at December 31, 2010, the Companys exploration and evaluation assets were $2,158 million including $1,114 million in the Canadian Division and $1,044 million in the USA Division.
Under previous GAAP, exploration and evaluation costs were capitalized as property, plant and equipment in accordance with the CICAs full cost accounting guidelines. Under IFRS, Encana capitalizes these costs initially as exploration and evaluation assets. Once technical feasibility and commercial viability of the area has been determined, the capitalized costs are transferred from exploration and evaluation assets to property, plant and equipment. Under IFRS, unrecoverable exploration and evaluation costs associated with an area and costs incurred prior to obtaining the legal rights to explore are expensed.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Encana transferred $303 million of capitalized exploration and evaluation costs to property, plant and equipment and expensed $50 million of unrecoverable exploration and evaluation assets and $15 million in direct exploration costs. The application of IFRS for exploration and evaluation costs resulted in a $27 million decrease, after tax, to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Development costs at January 1, 2010 were deemed to be $23,216 million, representing the upstream full cost pool balance under previous GAAP. Consistent with previous GAAP, these costs are capitalized as property, plant and equipment under IFRS. Under previous GAAP, development costs were depleted using the unit-of-production method calculated for each country cost centre. Under IFRS, development costs are depleted using the unit-of-production method calculated at the established area level. The IFRS 1 exemption permitted the Company to allocate development costs to the area level using proved reserves values for each Division as at January 1, 2010.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Depleting at an area level under IFRS resulted in an $86 million increase to Encanas DD&A expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. Encanas net earnings decreased $60 million, after tax, compared to previous GAAP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 as a result of depleting at an area level under IFRS.
Impairments
Under previous GAAP, an upstream impairment was recognized if the carrying amount exceeded the undiscounted cash flows from proved reserves for a country cost centre. An impairment was measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeded the sum of the fair value of the proved and probable reserves and the costs of unproved properties. Impairments recognized under previous GAAP were not reversed.
Under IFRS, an upstream impairment is recognized if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount for a cash-generating unit. Upstream areas are aggregated into cash-generating units based on their ability to generate largely independent cash flows. If the carrying value of the cash-generating unit exceeds the recoverable amount, the cash-generating unit is written down with an impairment recognized in net earnings. Impairments recognized under IFRS are reversed when there has been a subsequent increase in the recoverable amount. Impairment reversals are recognized in net earnings and the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit is increased to its revised recoverable amount as if no impairment had been recognized for the prior periods.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Encana recognized an after-tax impairment of $371 million relating to the Companys Canadian offshore upstream assets which form a cash-generating unit under IFRS. The impairment recognized was based on the difference between the December 31, 2010 net book value of the assets and the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount was determined using fair value less costs to sell based on after-tax discounted future cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs. Under previous GAAP, these assets were included in the Canadian cost centre ceiling test, which was not impaired at December 31, 2010.
Divestitures
Under previous GAAP, proceeds from divestitures of upstream assets were deducted from the full cost pool without recognition of a gain or loss unless the deduction resulted in a change to the country cost centre depletion rate of 20 percent or greater, in which case a gain or loss was recorded.
Under IFRS, gains or losses are recorded on divestitures and are calculated as the difference between the proceeds and the net book value of the asset disposed. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Encana recognized a $143 million net gain on divestitures under IFRS compared to previous GAAP results. The net gain arose from the Canadian and USA Divisions, totaling $90 million and $53 million, respectively. Accounting for divestitures under IFRS resulted in an after-tax increase of $101 million to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
Asset Retirement Obligation
Under previous GAAP, the asset retirement obligation was measured as the estimated fair value of the retirement and decommissioning expenditures expected to be incurred. Liabilities were not remeasured to reflect period end discount rates.
Under IFRS, the asset retirement obligation is measured as the best estimate of the expenditure to be incurred and requires that the asset retirement obligation be remeasured using the period end discount rate.
In conjunction with the IFRS 1 exemption regarding upstream assets discussed above, Encana was required to remeasure its asset retirement obligation upon transition to IFRS and recognize the difference in retained earnings. The application of this exemption resulted in a $32 million increase to the asset retirement obligation on Encanas Consolidated Balance Sheet as at January 1, 2010 and a corresponding after-tax charge to retained earnings of $26 million. Subsequent IFRS remeasurements of the obligation are recorded through property, plant and equipment with an offsetting adjustment to the asset retirement obligation. As at December 31, 2010, excluding the January 1, 2010 adjustment, Encanas asset retirement obligation increased by $101 million, which primarily reflects the remeasurement of the obligation using Encanas discount rate of 5.4 percent as at December 31, 2010.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Compensation
Share-based payments
Under previous GAAP, Encana accounted for certain stock-based compensation plans whereby the obligation and compensation costs were accrued over the vesting period using the intrinsic value method. The intrinsic value of a share unit is the amount by which the Companys share price exceeds the exercise price of the share unit.
For these stock-based compensation plans, IFRS requires the liability for share-based payments be fair valued using an option pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes-Merton model, at each reporting date. Accordingly, upon transition to IFRS, the Company recorded a fair value adjustment of $38 million as at January 1, 2010 to increase the share-based compensation liability with a corresponding charge to retained earnings. Encana elected to use the IFRS 1 exemption whereby the liabilities for share-based payments that had vested or settled prior to January 1, 2010 were not required to be retrospectively restated. Subsequent IFRS fair value adjustments are recorded through property, plant and equipment, exploration and evaluation expenses, operating expenses and administrative expenses with an offsetting adjustment to the share-based compensation liability.
In addition to the January 1, 2010 adjustment discussed above, the IFRS fair-value remeasurements subsequent to transition increased the current liability for share-based payments by $20 million as at December 31, 2010 in comparison to previous GAAP.
Pensions
Encana elected to use the IFRS 1 exemption whereby the cumulative unamortized net actuarial gains and losses of the Companys defined benefit plan are charged to retained earnings on January 1, 2010. This resulted in a $75 million increase to the accrued benefit obligation and a corresponding $55 million after-tax charge to retained earnings.
The application of IFRS for share-based payments and pension plans resulted in a $5 million decrease, after tax, to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
Foreign Currency
As permitted by IFRS 1, the Company elected to apply the exemption to set the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to zero upon transition to IFRS. Accordingly, $755 million was recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2010. The reclassification had no impact on total shareholders equity as at January 1, 2010. As a result of the election, the accounts of the Company have not been retrospectively restated using IFRS foreign currency principles.
Future foreign currency translation gains and losses that are recognized from the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment will differ under IFRS compared to previous GAAP due to the exemption taken above. The application of the IFRS exemption resulted in a $34 million increase to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. This arose due to the reversal of a foreign exchange loss recorded under previous GAAP that had been recognized in retained earnings under IFRS as a result of the exemption.
The IFRS adjustments discussed above and income tax are recorded in the Companys functional currency and are subject to translation for presentation purposes. The associated foreign currency impacts are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Income Tax
Deferred income taxes have been adjusted to reflect the tax effect arising from the differences between IFRS and previous GAAP. Upon transition to IFRS, the Company recognized a $26 million reduction in the deferred income tax liability with a corresponding increase to retained earnings. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, the application of the IFRS adjustments discussed above resulted in a $134 million decrease to the Companys deferred income tax expense and a corresponding increase to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Other Exemptions
Other significant IFRS 1 exemptions taken by Encana at January 1, 2010 include the following:
· Business combinations and joint ventures entered into prior to January 1, 2010 were not retrospectively restated under IFRS.
· Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of qualifying assets were not retrospectively restated prior to January 1, 2010.
· Leases were not reassessed to determine whether an arrangement contained a lease under International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease, for contracts that were already assessed under previous GAAP.
The remaining IFRS 1 exemptions were not applicable or material to the preparation of Encanas Consolidated Balance Sheet at the date of transition to IFRS on January 1, 2010.
IFRS Recent Pronouncements Issued
As of January 1, 2013, the following standards and amendments issued by the IASB become effective: IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements; IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements; IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities; IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement; IAS 19, Employee Benefits; and IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures. As of January 1, 2015, the following standard issued by the IASB becomes effective: IFRS 9, Financial Instruments.
As discussed previously, Encana is adopting U.S. GAAP and will be reporting its first quarter 2012 results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As a result, the new IASB standards and amendments will not be adopted. If Encana continued to report under IFRS, the Company expects that the new IASB standards and amendments would not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
IFRS Critical Accounting Estimates
Management is required to make judgments, assumptions and estimates in applying its accounting policies and practices, which have a significant impact on the financial results of the Company. The preceding discussion outlines the Companys significant accounting policies and practices adopted under IFRS. The following discussion outlines the accounting policies and practices involving the use of estimates that are critical to determining Encanas financial results.
Upstream Assets and Reserves
Reserves estimates can have a significant impact on net earnings, as they are a key input to the Companys DD&A calculations and impairment tests. Costs accumulated within each area are depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves using estimated future prices and costs. Costs subject to depletion include estimated future costs to be incurred in developing proved reserves. A downward revision in reserves estimates or an increase in estimated future development costs could result in the recognition of a higher DD&A charge to net earnings.
Upstream assets, including exploration and evaluation costs and development costs, are aggregated into cash-generating units based on their ability to generate largely independent cash flows. If the carrying value of the cash-generating unit exceeds the recoverable amount, the cash-generating unit is written down with an impairment recognized in net earnings. The recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is the greater of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Fair value less costs to sell may be determined using after-tax discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Value in use is determined by estimating the present value of the future net cash flows expected to be derived from continued use of the cash-generating unit. A downward revision in reserves estimates could result in the recognition of impairments charged to net earnings.
Reversals of impairments are recognized when there has been a subsequent increase in the recoverable amount. In this event, the carrying amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is increased to its revised recoverable amount with an impairment reversal recognized in net earnings.
All of Encanas oil and gas reserves and resources are evaluated and reported on by independent qualified reserves evaluators. The estimation of reserves is a subjective process. Forecasts are based on engineering data, projected future rates of production, estimated commodity price forecasts and the timing of future expenditures, all of which are subject to numerous uncertainties and various interpretations. Reserves estimates can be revised upward or downward based on the results of future drilling, testing, production levels and economics of recovery based on cash flow forecasts. Contingent resources are not classified as reserves due to the absence of a commercial development plan that includes a firm intent to develop within a reasonable time frame.
Asset Retirement Obligation
Asset retirement obligations include present obligations where the Company will be required to retire tangible long-lived assets such as producing well sites, offshore production platforms and natural gas processing plants. The asset retirement obligation is measured at the present value of the expenditure to be incurred. The associated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset. Changes in the estimated obligation resulting from revisions to estimated timing, amount of cash flows or changes in discount rate are recognized as a change in the asset retirement obligation and the related asset retirement cost.
Increases in the estimated asset retirement obligation and costs increase the corresponding charges of accretion and DD&A to net earnings. A decrease in discount rates increases the asset retirement obligation, which decreases the accretion charged to net earnings. Actual expenditures incurred are charged against the accumulated asset retirement obligation.
Goodwill
Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, is assessed for impairment annually at December 31 of each year. Goodwill is currently attributed to the aggregated cash-generating units that collectively form the respective Canadian and USA Divisions. This represents the lowest level that goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes.
To assess impairment, the goodwill carrying amount for each Division is compared to the recoverable amount of the aggregated cash-generating units of the Division. If the carrying amount for the Division exceeds the recoverable amount, the associated goodwill is written down with an impairment recognized in net earnings. Goodwill impairments are not reversed.
The recoverable amount is the greater of the Divisions fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Fair value less costs to sell is derived by estimating the discounted after-tax future net cash flows for the aggregated cash-generating units. Discounted future net cash flows may be based on forecast commodity prices and costs over the expected economic life of the proved and probable reserves and discounted using market-based rates. Value in use is determined by estimating the present value of the future net cash flows expected to be derived from the continued use of the aggregated cash-generating units. A downward revision in reserves estimates could result in the recognition of a goodwill impairment charge to net earnings.
Income Taxes
Encana follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recorded for the effect of any temporary difference between the accounting and income tax basis of an asset or liability, using the substantively enacted income tax rates. Current income taxes for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recoverable from or payable to the taxation authorities based on the income tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the end of the reporting period.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
The deferred income tax assets and liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in enacted or substantively enacted income tax rates that are expected to apply, with the corresponding adjustment recognized in net earnings or in shareholders equity depending on the item to which the adjustment relates.
Tax interpretations, regulations and legislation in the various jurisdictions in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate are subject to change. As such, income taxes are subject to measurement uncertainty and the interpretations can impact net earnings through the income tax expense arising from the changes in deferred income tax assets or liabilities.
Derivative Financial Instruments
As described in the Risk Management section of this MD&A, derivative financial instruments are used by Encana to manage its exposure to market risks relating to commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The Companys policy is to not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Derivative financial instruments that do not qualify, or are not designated, as hedges for accounting are recorded at fair value. Instruments are recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings. Realized gains or losses are recognized in revenues as the contracts are settled. Unrealized gains and losses are presented in revenue at the end of each respective reporting period based on the change in fair value. The estimate of fair value of all derivative instruments is based on quoted market prices or, in their absence, third-party market indications and forecasts. The estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities is subject to measurement uncertainty.
For 2010 through to 2011, the Company elected not to designate any of its derivative financial instruments as hedges for accounting. As a result, the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments were recorded in the Companys net earnings.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
In December 2011, Encana announced that it will adopt U.S. GAAP for 2012 financial reporting. As a result, the Company will report its 2012 results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company believes U.S. GAAP financial results are relevant and provide information that is more directly comparable with U.S. peer companies. Historically, Encana has provided reconciliations to U.S. GAAP in its annual consolidated financial statements. Reconciliations of Encanas results from IFRS to U.S. GAAP are included in Note 27 to the Companys Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following provides summary reconciliations of Encanas 2011 and 2010 IFRS to U.S. GAAP results, along with a discussion of the significant U.S. GAAP accounting policy changes.
Summary Net Earnings Reconciliation IFRS to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings IFRS |
|
$ 128 |
|
$ (246) |
|
$ 120 |
|
$ 176 |
|
$ 78 |
|
$ 1,170 |
|
After-tax addition / (deduction): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full cost accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
92 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
79 |
|
6 |
|
27 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
779 |
|
206 |
|
207 |
|
194 |
|
172 |
|
883 |
|
Impairments - IFRS |
|
854 |
|
854 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
371 |
|
- U.S. GAAP |
|
(1,687 |
) |
(1,105 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(582) |
|
- |
|
Gain (loss) on divestitures, net |
|
(213 |
) |
(105 |
) |
1 |
|
(26 |
) |
(83) |
|
(101 |
) |
Income tax |
|
21 |
|
(84 |
) |
129 |
|
(40 |
) |
16 |
|
- |
|
Other |
|
31 |
|
(1 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
32 |
|
(7 |
) |
Net Earnings U.S. GAAP |
|
$ 5 |
|
$ (476 |
) |
$ 459 |
|
$ 383 |
|
$ (361) |
|
$ 2,343 |
|
Operating Earnings Reconciliation IFRS to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Earnings(1) IFRS |
|
$ 398 |
|
$ 46 |
|
$ 171 |
|
$ 166 |
|
$ 15 |
|
$ 598 |
|
After-tax addition / (deduction): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full cost accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
14 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
779 |
|
206 |
|
207 |
|
194 |
|
172 |
|
883 |
|
Gain (loss) on divestitures, net |
|
(15 |
) |
(17 |
) |
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Income tax |
|
21 |
|
(84 |
) |
129 |
|
(40 |
) |
16 |
|
- |
|
Other |
|
(6 |
) |
(6 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(8 |
) |
Operating Earnings(1) U.S. GAAP |
|
$ 1,191 |
|
$ 150 |
|
$ 511 |
|
$ 321 |
|
$ 209 |
|
$ 1,474 |
|
(1) A non-GAAP measure, which is defined under the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A.
Encana Corporation |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Financial Metrics IFRS and U.S. GAAP
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Annual |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cash Flow (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
IFRS |
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
$ |
976 |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
$ |
955 |
|
$ |
4,437 |
|
U.S. GAAP |
|
4,216 |
|
983 |
|
1,181 |
|
1,089 |
|
963 |
|
4,439 |
| ||||||
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
IFRS |
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,583 |
| ||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
22,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,440 |
| ||||||
Total Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
IFRS |
|
$ |
17,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,750 |
| ||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
14,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,947 |
| ||||||
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
IFRS |
|
$ |
16,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,833 |
| ||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
8,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,493 |
| ||||||
Debt to Capitalization (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
IFRS |
|
33% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31% |
| ||||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
49% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45% |
| ||||||
Return on Capital Employed (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
IFRS |
|
2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% |
| ||||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16% |
| ||||||
(1) A non-GAAP measure, which is defined under the Non-GAAP Measures section of this MD&A.
U.S. GAAP Accounting Policy Changes
The following discussion explains the significant differences between Encanas IFRS accounting policies and those applied by the Company under U.S. GAAP, including the related impacts on the Companys consolidated financial results.
Full Cost Accounting
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana accounts for upstream activities in accordance with full cost accounting rules whereby all costs directly associated with the acquisition of, the exploration for, and the development of natural gas, oil and NGL reserves are capitalized on a country-by-country cost centre basis within a full cost pool. Costs accumulated within each cost centre are depleted using the unit-of-production method and are subject to a ceiling test to assess for impairment. Depletion calculations and ceiling test impairments are determined using proved reserves based on 12-month average trailing prices and unescalated costs.
Exploration and Evaluation
Under U.S. GAAP, all exploration and evaluation costs are capitalized within the full cost pool and are presented as property, plant and equipment. The exploration and evaluation costs generally represent the unproved properties balance. The cost of unproved properties is excluded, on a cost centre basis, from costs subject to depletion until it is determined whether or not proved reserves are attributable to the properties or impairment has occurred. Costs that have been impaired are included in the costs subject to depletion.
Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation costs are initially capitalized as exploration and evaluation assets. Costs associated with an area determined to be commercially viable are transferred to property, plant and equipment, while unrecoverable costs are expensed.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, exploration and evaluation expense decreased $142 million ($92 million after tax) as the costs were capitalized to the full cost pool. For the year ended December 31, 2010, exploration and evaluation expense decreased $65 million as exploration and evaluation costs of $42 million were capitalized to the full cost pool, $10 million of unrecoverable exploration costs were reclassified to depreciation, depletion and amortization and $13 million of indirect exploration costs were reclassified to operating expense. Cumulatively, these adjustments totaled $27 million after tax.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Under U.S. GAAP, each country cost centre is depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves using 12-month average trailing prices and unescalated costs. Under IFRS, upstream development costs are depleted using the unit-of-production method calculated at an area level based on proved reserves estimated using forecast prices and costs.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, depletion expense decreased by $1,141 million, or $779 million after tax, (2010 $1,310 million, or $883 million after tax), primarily due to previous ceiling test impairments recognized in 2008 and 2009.
Impairments
Under U.S. GAAP, a ceiling test impairment is recognized when the capitalized costs aggregated at the country cost centre level exceeds the sum of the estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved reserves, using 12-month average trailing prices and unescalated future development and production costs, discounted at 10 percent, plus unimpaired unproved property costs. Ceiling test impairments are not subsequently reversed.
Under IFRS, impairments are recognized if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount for a cash generating unit. The recoverable amount is generally determined using after-tax discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, ceiling test impairments of $2,249 million or $1,687 million after tax (2010 nil) were recognized for the Canadian cost centre. The ceiling test impairments primarily resulted from the decline in 12-month trailing natural gas prices. At December 31, 2011, the 12-month trailing prices were based on the following benchmark prices, adjusted for basis differentials to determine local reference prices, transportation costs and tariffs, heat content and quality.
(average for the period) |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
AECO (C$/MMBtu) |
|
3.76 |
|
Henry Hub ($/MMBtu) |
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
Edmonton - Light Sweet (C$/bbl) |
|
96.53 |
|
WTI ($/bbl) |
|
96.19 |
|
Under IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2011, impairment expense of $1,304 million, or $854 million after tax (2010 $496 million, or $371 million after tax) was recognized. The IFRS impairments were reversed under U.S. GAAP as the costs were included in the respective country cost centre ceiling test impairment calculations.
Divestitures
Under U.S. GAAP, proceeds from divestitures of properties are deducted from the full cost pool without recognition of a gain or loss unless the deduction significantly alters the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of the cost centre, in which case a gain or loss would be recognized. Under IFRS, gains or losses on divestitures are calculated as the difference between the proceeds and the net book value of the assets disposed of. Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, a net gain on divestiture of $347 million or $213 million after tax, (2010 $143 million, or $101 million after tax) recognized under IFRS was reversed from net earnings and recognized in property, plant and equipment.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Summary
For the year ended December 31, 2011, full cost accounting adjustments reduced net earnings by $175 million. The full cost accounting adjustments included a $142 million reduction to exploration and evaluation expense ($92 million after tax), a $1,141 million reduction to depreciation, depletion and amortization expense ($779 million after tax), a $945 million increase to impairment expense ($833 million after tax) and a $347 million reduction to gain/loss on divestitures ($213 million after tax).
For the year ended December 31, 2010, full cost accounting adjustments increased net earnings by $1,180 million. The full cost accounting adjustments primarily included reductions of $1,310 million to depreciation, depletion and amortization expense ($883 million after tax), $496 million to impairment expense ($371 million after tax) and $143 million to gain/loss on divestitures ($101 million after tax).
As at December 31, 2010, full cost accounting adjustments reduced total assets by $11.0 billion, long-term liabilities by $3.8 billion and shareholders equity by $7.2 billion. The full cost accounting adjustments result primarily from the previous after-tax ceiling test impairments recognized in 2008 and 2009 of $1.1 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively.
As at December 31, 2011, full cost accounting adjustments reduced total assets by $11.0 billion, long-term liabilities by $3.4 billion and shareholders equity by $7.6 billion, which include the ceiling test impairment recognized in 2011 of $1.7 billion after tax.
Other
Asset Retirement Obligation
Under U.S. GAAP, the asset retirement obligation is measured as the estimated fair value of the retirement and decommissioning expenditures expected to be incurred. Liabilities are not remeasured to reflect period end discount rates. Under IFRS, the asset retirement obligation is measured as the best estimate of the expenditure to be incurred and requires that the asset retirement obligation be remeasured using the period end discount rate.
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana reversed the January 1, 2010 IFRS adjustment of $32 million recognized in retained earnings when the Company remeasured its asset retirement obligation upon transition to IFRS. For the year ended December 31, 2011, net earnings under U.S. GAAP increased by $1 million (2010 $1 million) due to the difference in discount rates used to measure the ARO liability. As at December 31, 2011, the cumulative U.S. GAAP adjustments related to ARO reduced Encanas total assets by $103 million (2010 $97 million), reduced long-term liabilities by $132 million (2010 $126 million) and increased shareholders equity by $29 million (2010 $29 million).
Compensation Pensions and Share-Based Payments
Under U.S. GAAP, the funded status of defined benefit and pension plans are recognized on the balance sheet as an asset or liability with changes in the funded status recognized in other comprehensive income. Under IFRS, the over-funded or under-funded status arising from defined benefit and pension plans is not recognized on the balance sheet.
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana reversed the January 1, 2010 IFRS adjustment of $75 million recognized in retained earnings when the Company elected to charge the cumulative unamortized net actuarial gains and losses of the Companys defined benefit plan to retained earnings upon transition to IFRS.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, adjustments for the over/under funded status of the defined benefit pension plan decreased comprehensive income by $34 million after tax (2010 - $2 million after tax).
Under both IFRS and U.S. GAAP, obligations for payments in cash or common shares under share-based compensation plans are accrued over the vesting period using fair values. Upon adoption of IFRS, Encana elected a transition provision whereby share-based compensation plans that had vested or settled prior to the transition date of January 1, 2010 were not retrospectively restated. Under U.S. GAAP, Encana adopted the share-based payment standard in 2006 using the modified-prospective approach. The different adoption dates of the standards and transitional provisions applied resulted in share-based payment adjustments.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, adjustments for pension and share-based compensation decreased net earnings by $7 million (2010 $9 million).
As at December 31, 2011, the cumulative U.S. GAAP compensation adjustments increased total assets by $31 million (2010 $33 million), increased total liabilities by $79 million (2010 $36 million) and reduced shareholders equity by $48 million (2010 $3 million).
Income Taxes
Under U.S. GAAP, income tax is calculated using the enacted income tax rates and legislation expected to apply when the assets are realized or liabilities are settled. Under IFRS, income tax is calculated using the enacted or substantively enacted income tax rates and legislation. In addition, under U.S. GAAP, interim tax provisions are measured using estimates of annual effective tax rates that may differ from those determined under IFRS.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized an additional deferred tax expense of $164 million (2010 $549 million) resulting from the related tax effect on U.S. GAAP adjustments discussed above.
Under IFRS, certain current income tax benefits were recognized in previous years in respect of tax legislation that was considered substantively enacted in Canada but not enacted for U.S. GAAP. For the year ended December 31, 2011, $21 million of current income tax benefits related to this legislation was recognized under U.S. GAAP in respect of a previous taxation year that became statute-barred for Canadian tax purposes. As at December 31, 2011, the current tax benefits related to this legislation in respect of open taxation years that have not yet been recognized under U.S. GAAP totaled $136 million (2010 $160 million).
Foreign Currency
Under U.S. GAAP, the settlement of intra-entity foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment nature between entities that are consolidated in the Companys financial statements are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. Under IFRS, the foreign exchange impacts of these transactions are recognized in net earnings. Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, a foreign exchange loss of $37 million (2010 $1 million) was reclassified from net earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, net earnings under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $37 million (2010 $1 million).
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana reversed the January 1, 2010 IFRS adjustment of $755 million recognized in retained earnings when the Company elected to set the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to zero upon transition to IFRS. The adjustment had no impact on total shareholders equity.
Debt Reclassifications
Under U.S. GAAP, bank overdraft positions are segregated from cash and cash equivalents on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and are reported within accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Similarly, the change in bank overdraft positions is segregated from cash and cash equivalents on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and shown separately as a financing activity.
Under U.S. GAAP, the revolving credit facilities borrowings and commercial paper issuances are reclassified from current debt to long-term debt. The credit facilities are considered long-term as they mature in October 2015 and are used to backstop the commercial paper program. Under U.S. GAAP, debt transaction costs are reclassified from long-term debt to investments and other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Net Earnings and Operating Earnings per Common Share
Under U.S. GAAP, compensation plans that may be settled at the employees option in either cash or common shares are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation if it is probable that the plan will be settled in cash. Under IFRS, these plans are presumed to be settled in common shares and are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation if they are determined to be dilutive.
U.S. GAAP net earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of Encana common shares outstanding as below. The difference between the basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding reflects the effect of dilutive securities.
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
736.3 |
|
736.3 |
|
736.3 |
|
736.3 |
|
736.3 |
|
739.7 |
|
Diluted |
|
737.2 |
|
736.8 |
|
737.6 |
|
737.6 |
|
737.6 |
|
739.8 |
|
U.S. GAAP Recent Pronouncements Issued
Under U.S. GAAP, as of January 1, 2012, Encana will be required to adopt the following standards and updates issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which should not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements:
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, clarifies and changes existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The changes primarily relate to fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs. The amendments will be applied prospectively and will expand the Companys fair value measurement disclosures.
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, requires that net earnings and comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. Encana currently presents two separate consecutive statements.
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, permits an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the two-step goodwill impairment test is required to be performed as described in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. The amendments will be applied prospectively.
Under U.S. GAAP, as of January 1, 2013, Encana will be required to adopt the following standard issued by the FASB, which should not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements:
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, requires disclosure of both gross and net information about financial instruments eligible for offset in the balance sheet and financial instruments subject to master netting arrangements. The amendments will be applied retrospectively and will expand the Companys financial instruments disclosures.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Non-GAAP Measures |
Certain measures in this document do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by IFRS and previous GAAP and, therefore, are considered non-GAAP measures. These measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. These measures are commonly used in the oil and gas industry and by Encana to provide shareholders and potential investors with additional information regarding the Companys liquidity and its ability to generate funds to finance its operations. Non-GAAP measures include Cash Flow, Cash Flow per share diluted, Operating Earnings, Operating Earnings per share diluted, Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow, Debt to Adjusted EBITDA, Debt to Capitalization, and Return on Capital Employed. Managements use of these measures is discussed further below.
Cash Flow
Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure commonly used in the oil and gas industry and by Encana to assist Management and investors in measuring the Companys ability to finance capital programs and meet financial obligations. Cash Flow is defined as cash from operating activities excluding net change in other assets and liabilities, net change in non-cash working capital and cash tax on sale of assets. Under IFRS, cash tax on divestitures is included in investing activities. Under U.S. GAAP, cash tax on divestitures is included in operating activities.
IFRS
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities |
|
$ |
4,043 |
|
$ |
1,110 |
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
$ |
963 |
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
2,363 |
|
$ |
919 |
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
$ |
893 |
|
$ |
(773 |
) |
(Add back) deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
|
(94 |
) |
(27 |
) |
(13 |
) |
(31 |
) |
(23 |
) |
|
(84 |
) |
1 |
|
(16 |
) |
(38 |
) |
(31 |
) | ||||||||||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(38 |
) |
161 |
|
193 |
|
(93 |
) |
(299 |
) |
|
(1,990 |
) |
1 |
|
209 |
|
(286 |
) |
(1,914 |
) | ||||||||||
Cash Flow |
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
$ |
976 |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
$ |
955 |
|
|
$ |
4,437 |
|
$ |
917 |
|
$ |
1,131 |
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities |
|
$ |
3,929 |
|
$ |
983 |
|
$ |
1,340 |
|
$ |
965 |
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
2,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Add back) deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
|
(114 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(13 |
) |
(31 |
) |
(23 |
) |
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(59 |
) |
161 |
|
172 |
|
(93 |
) |
(299 |
) |
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash tax on sale of assets |
|
(114 |
) |
(114 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash Flow |
|
$ |
4,216 |
|
$ |
983 |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
4,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Operating Earnings
Operating Earnings is a non-GAAP measure that adjusts Net Earnings by non-operating items that Management believes reduces the comparability of the Companys underlying financial performance between periods. Operating Earnings is commonly used in the oil and gas industry and by Encana to provide investors with information that is more comparable between periods.
Operating Earnings is defined as Net Earnings excluding non-recurring or non-cash items that Management believes reduces the comparability of the Companys financial performance between periods. These after-tax items may include, but are not limited to, unrealized hedging gains/losses, exploration and evaluation expenses, impairments and impairment reversals, gains/losses on divestitures, foreign exchange gains/losses and the effect of changes in statutory income tax rates.
Encana has updated its Operating Earnings definition to exclude non-operating items resulting from the adoption of IFRS, such as exploration and evaluation expenses and gains/losses on divestitures.
IFRS
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
(246 |
) |
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
176 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
$ |
(469 |
) |
$ |
606 |
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
$ |
1,490 |
|
After-tax (addition) / deduction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Unrealized hedging gain (loss) |
|
600 |
|
397 |
|
273 |
|
18 |
|
(88 |
) |
|
634 |
|
(269 |
) |
331 |
|
(340 |
) |
912 |
| ||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
(78 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(78 |
) |
- |
|
|
(26 |
) |
(26 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
| ||||||||||
Impairments |
|
(854 |
) |
(854 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
(371 |
) |
(371 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
| ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestitures |
|
198 |
|
88 |
|
1 |
|
26 |
|
83 |
|
|
101 |
|
(12 |
) |
51 |
|
28 |
|
34 |
| ||||||||||
Non-operating foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
(136 |
) |
77 |
|
(325 |
) |
44 |
|
68 |
|
|
234 |
|
159 |
|
139 |
|
(211 |
) |
147 |
| ||||||||||
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
398 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
171 |
|
$ |
166 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
598 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
85 |
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
$ |
0.80 |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Operating Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Annual |
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
(476 |
) |
$ |
459 |
|
$ |
383 |
|
$ |
(361 |
) |
|
$ |
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
After-tax (addition) / deduction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Unrealized hedging (gain) loss |
|
600 |
|
397 |
|
273 |
|
18 |
|
(88 |
) |
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Impairments |
|
(1,687 |
) |
(1,105 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(582 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Non-operating foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
(99 |
) |
82 |
|
(325 |
) |
44 |
|
100 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Operating Earnings |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
$ |
150 |
|
$ |
511 |
|
$ |
321 |
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
1,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Return on Capital Employed
Return on Capital Employed is a non-GAAP measure reviewed by Management and defined as a ratio of Net Earnings on a trailing 12-month basis excluding interest expense after tax to average invested capital (average debt plus average shareholders equity).
IFRS
($ millions) |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ 128 |
|
|
$ 1,170 |
|
After-tax addition / (deduction): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
344 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
1,530 |
|
Average Capital Employed |
|
$ 24,435 |
|
|
$ 24,363 |
|
Return on Capital Employed |
|
2% |
|
|
6% |
|
U.S. GAAP
($ millions) |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ 5 |
|
|
$ 2,343 |
|
After-tax addition / (deduction): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
344 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
2,703 |
|
Average Capital Employed |
|
$ 16,952 |
|
|
$ 16,473 |
|
Return on Capital Employed |
|
2% |
|
|
16% |
|
Other Non-GAAP Measures
Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow
Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure monitored by Management as an indicator of the Companys overall financial strength. Debt Adjusted Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure defined as Cash Flow on a trailing 12-month basis excluding interest expense after tax.
Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
Debt to Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure monitored by Management as an indicator of the Companys overall financial strength. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as trailing 12-month Net Earnings before gains or losses on divestitures, income taxes, foreign exchange gains or losses, interest, accretion of asset retirement obligation, DD&A, exploration and evaluation expenses, impairments and unrealized hedging gains and losses.
Debt to Capitalization
Debt to Capitalization is a non-GAAP measure monitored by Management as an indicator of the Companys overall financial strength. Capitalization is a non-GAAP measure defined as current and long-term debt plus shareholders equity.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Advisory |
Forward-Looking Statements
In the interest of providing Encana shareholders and potential investors with information regarding the Company and its subsidiaries, including Managements assessment of Encanas and its subsidiaries future plans and operations, certain statements contained in this document constitute forward-looking statements or information (collectively referred to herein as forward-looking statements) within the meaning of the safe harbour provisions of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as anticipate, believe, expect, plan, intend, forecast, target, project, objective, strategy, strives or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: achieving the Companys business objectives of growing its portfolio to produce natural gas, oil and NGLs, maintaining financial strength, optimizing capital investments, continuing to pay a stable dividend; long-term strategy of accelerating value recognition of assets; achieving operating efficiencies, lowering cost structures and success of resource play hub model; balancing near term uncertainty with focused capital investment in building long-term growth capacity; aligning capital investment plus anticipated dividends with expected cash flow generation before divestiture proceeds; attaining additional financial flexibility from proceeds from planned divestitures and joint venture transactions; expected reduction in capital program for drier natural gas plays while directing greater investment towards oil and liquids-rich development and exploration opportunities; increasing its production of oil and NGLs, including expansion of extraction facilities and exploration program; ability to attract third party investments; ability to expand natural gas markets in North America and potential development of liquefied natural gas export terminal in British Columbia; mitigating cost increases through improving efficiencies and technology innovation; adoption of U.S. GAAP for 2012 financial reporting; completion of transaction agreements with Mitsubishi, including potential terms, closing date, amount of investments, funding commitment and development of otherwise undeveloped natural gas properties; expected completion dates and proceeds from the sale of certain assets; expanding deep cut processing capacities; projections contained in the 2012 Corporate Guidance (including estimates of cash flow including per share, natural gas, oil and NGLs production, capital investment and its allocation, net divestitures, and 2012 estimated sensitivities of cash flow and operating earnings); estimates of proved reserves, before and after royalties, including by product types and locations; potential joint venture transactions and third party investments; projections relating to the adequacy of the Companys provision for taxes; projections with respect to natural gas production from resource plays; the flexibility of capital spending plans and the source of funding therefore; the effect of the Companys risk management program, including the impact of derivative financial instruments; the impact of the changes and proposed changes in laws and regulations, including those relating to hydraulic fracturing, greenhouse gas, carbon and climate change initiatives on the Companys operations and operating costs; projections that the Company has access to cash equivalents and a wide range of funding at competitive rates; the Companys continued compliance with financial covenants under its credit facilities; the Companys ability to pay its creditors, suppliers, commitments and fund its 2012 capital program and pay dividends to shareholders; the effect of the Companys risk mitigation policies, systems, processes and insurance program; the Companys expectations for future Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow, Debt to Adjusted EBITDA and Debt to Capitalization ratios; the expected impact and timing of various accounting pronouncements, rule changes and standards, including IFRS, on the Company and its Consolidated Financial Statements; projections that natural gas represents an abundant, secure, long-term supply of energy to meet North American needs. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations upon which they are based will occur. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not occur, which may cause the Companys actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any estimates or projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These assumptions, risks and uncertainties include, among other things: volatility of, and assumptions regarding natural gas and liquids prices, including substantial or extended decline of the same; assumptions based upon the Companys current guidance; fluctuations in currency and interest rates; risk that the Company may not conclude divestitures of certain assets or other transactions (including third-party capital investments, farm-outs or partnerships, which Encana may refer to from time to time as joint ventures) as a result of various conditions not being met; product supply and demand; market competition; risks inherent in the Companys and its subsidiaries marketing operations, including credit risks; imprecision of reserves estimates and estimates of recoverable quantities of natural gas and liquids from resource plays and other sources not currently classified as proved, probable or possible reserves or economic contingent resources, including future net revenue estimates; marketing margins; potential disruption or unexpected technical difficulties in developing new facilities; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing or modifying processing facilities; risks associated with technology; the Companys ability to replace, expand or find additional reserves; hedging activities resulting in realized and unrealized losses; business interruption and casualty losses; risk of the Company not operating all its properties and assets; counterparty risk; downgrade in credit rating and its adverse effects; liability for indemnification obligations to third parties; variability of dividends to be paid; its ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet its current and future obligations; its ability to access external sources of debt and equity capital; the timing and the costs of well and pipeline construction; the Companys ability to secure adequate product transportation; changes in royalty, tax, environmental, greenhouse gas, carbon, accounting and other laws or regulations or the interpretations of such laws or regulations; political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates; terrorist threats; risks associated with existing and potential future lawsuits and regulatory actions made against the Company; and other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in the reports and filings made with securities regulatory authorities by Encana.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
Although Encana believes that the expectations represented by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are made as of the date of this document, and except as required by law, Encana does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
Forward-looking information respecting anticipated 2012 Cash Flow is based upon achieving average production in 2012 of natural gas of between 2.8 to 3.1 Bcf/d, liquids of 28 Mbbls/d, commodity prices for natural gas of NYMEX $3.25/Mcf, oil (WTI) $95.00/bbl, U.S./Canadian dollar foreign exchange rate of $1.00 and a weighted average number of outstanding shares for Encana of approximately 736 million. Assumptions relating to forward-looking statements generally include Encanas current expectations and projections made by the Company in light of, and generally consistent with, its historical experience and its perception of historical trends, as well as expectations regarding rates of advancement and innovation, generally consistent with and informed by its past experience, all of which are subject to the risk factors identified elsewhere in this document.
Encana is required to disclose events and circumstances that occurred during the period to which this MD&A relates that are reasonably likely to cause actual results to differ materially from material forward-looking statements for a period that is not yet complete that Encana has previously disclosed to the public and the expected differences thereto. Such disclosure can be found in Encanas news release dated February 17, 2012, which is available on Encanas website at www.encana.com, on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Oil and Gas Information
National Instrument 51-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators imposes oil and gas disclosure standards for Canadian public companies engaged in oil and gas activities. Prior to 2011, Encana relied upon an exemption from NI 51-101 granted by Canadian securities regulatory authorities to permit it to provide disclosure relating to reserves and other oil and gas information in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements. Subsequent to the expiry of that exemption, Encana has provided and continues to provide disclosure which complies with the annual disclosure requirements of NI 51-101 in the Companys AIF. The Canadian protocol disclosure is contained in Appendix A and under Narrative Description of the Business in the AIF. Encana has obtained an exemption dated January 4, 2011 from certain requirements of NI 51-101 to permit it to provide certain disclosure prepared in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements, in addition to the Canadian protocol disclosure. That disclosure is primarily set forth in Appendix D of the AIF.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
A description of the primary differences between the disclosure requirements under the Canadian standards and the disclosure requirements under the U.S. standards is set forth under the heading Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information in the AIF.
Natural Gas, Oil and NGLs Conversions
In this document, certain oil and NGL volumes have been converted to cubic feet equivalent (cfe) on the basis of one barrel (bbl) to six thousand cubic feet (Mcf). Cfe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A conversion ratio of one bbl to six Mcf is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent value equivalency at the wellhead.
Given that the value ratio based on the current price of oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value.
Resource Play
Resource play is a term used by Encana to describe an accumulation of hydrocarbons known to exist over a large areal expanse and/or thick vertical section, which when compared to a conventional play typically has a lower geological and/or commercial development risk and lower average decline rate.
Currency and References to Encana
All information included in this document and the Consolidated Financial Statements and comparative information is shown on a U.S. dollar, after royalties basis unless otherwise noted. References to C$ are to Canadian dollars. Encanas functional currency is Canadian dollars, however, the Company has adopted the U.S. dollar as its presentation currency to facilitate a more direct comparison to other North American oil and gas companies. All proceeds from divestitures are provided on a before-tax basis.
For convenience, references in this document to Encana, the Company, we, us, our and its may, where applicable, refer only to or include any relevant direct and indirect subsidiary corporations and partnerships (Subsidiaries) of Encana Corporation, and the assets, activities and initiatives of such Subsidiaries.
Additional Information
Further information regarding Encana Corporation, including its Annual Information Form, can be accessed under the Companys public filings found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and on the Companys website at www.encana.com.
Encana Corporation |
Managements Discussion and Analysis (prepared in US$) |
|
|
Encana Corporation
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
(Prepared in U.S. Dollars)
|
Management Report
Managements Responsibility for Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Encana Corporation (the Company) are the responsibility of Management. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared by Management in United States dollars in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and include certain estimates that reflect Managements best judgments. Financial information contained throughout the annual report is consistent with these financial statements.
The Companys Board of Directors has approved the information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Board of Directors fulfils its responsibility regarding the financial statements mainly through its Audit Committee, which has a written mandate that complies with the current requirements of Canadian securities legislation and the United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and voluntarily complies, in principle, with the Audit Committee guidelines of the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee meets at least on a quarterly basis.
Managements Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Companys financial reporting. The internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys Management regarding the preparation and presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the design and effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011. In making its assessment, Management has used the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Based on our evaluation, Management has concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effectively designed and operating effectively as at that date.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent firm of chartered accountants, was appointed by a vote of shareholders at the Companys last annual meeting to audit and provide independent opinions on both the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Companys internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011, as stated in their Auditors Report. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has provided such opinions.
/s/ Randall K. Eresman |
|
/s/ Sherri A. Brillon |
Randall K. Eresman |
|
Sherri A. Brillon |
President & |
|
Executive Vice-President & |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
February 23, 2012 |
|
|
Encana Corporation
|
|
|
Auditors Report
Independent Auditors Report to the Shareholders of Encana Corporation
We have completed an integrated audit of Encana Corporations 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements and its internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011 and an audit of its 2010 Consolidated Financial Statements. Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Encana Corporation, which comprise the Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010 and the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Income, Changes in Shareholders Equity and Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related notes, which comprise a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Consolidated Financial Statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. Canadian generally accepted auditing standards require that we comply with ethical requirements.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence, on a test basis, about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the companys preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting principles and policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Encana Corporation as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010 and its financial performance and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Encana Corporation
|
|
|
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have also audited Encana Corporations internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Managements Responsibility for Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our audit opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting.
Definition of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Encana Corporation
|
|
|
Opinion
In our opinion, Encana Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
February 23, 2012
Encana Corporation
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
For the years ended December 31 (US$ millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 26) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
(Note 4) |
|
$ |
8,467 |
|
|
$ |
8,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Expenses |
|
(Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
217 |
| ||
Transportation |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
859 |
| ||
Operating |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
1,060 |
| ||
Purchased product |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
739 |
| ||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
(Note 11) |
|
142 |
|
|
65 |
| ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(Note 12) |
|
3,423 |
|
|
3,318 |
| ||
Impairments |
|
(Note 12) |
|
1,304 |
|
|
496 |
| ||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(Note 5) |
|
(326 |
) |
|
(141 |
) | ||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
(Note 18) |
|
51 |
|
|
48 |
| ||
Administrative |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
361 |
| ||
Interest |
|
(Note 6) |
|
468 |
|
|
501 |
| ||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
(Note 7) |
|
170 |
|
|
(250 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings Before Income Tax |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1,597 |
| ||
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
(Note 8) |
|
(126 |
) |
|
427 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings per Common Share |
|
(Note 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31 (US$ millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 26) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
(55 |
) |
|
250 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Encana Corporation |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
As at |
|
As at |
| |||
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
| |||
(US$ millions) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 26) |
|
(Note 26) |
| |||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
4,275 |
|
Accounts receivable and accrued revenues |
|
(Note 9) |
|
1,073 |
|
1,103 |
|
1,180 |
| |||
Risk management |
|
(Note 22) |
|
1,806 |
|
729 |
|
328 |
| |||
Income tax receivable |
|
|
|
521 |
|
390 |
|
- |
| |||
Inventories |
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
12 |
| |||
Assets held for sale |
|
(Note 10) |
|
793 |
|
- |
|
- |
| |||
|
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
2,854 |
|
5,795 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
(Notes 4, 11) |
|
2,458 |
|
2,158 |
|
1,885 |
| |||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
(Notes 4, 12) |
|
23,913 |
|
26,145 |
|
24,288 |
| |||
Investments and Other Assets |
|
(Note 13) |
|
763 |
|
196 |
|
119 |
| |||
Risk Management |
|
(Note 22) |
|
241 |
|
505 |
|
32 |
| |||
Goodwill |
|
(Notes 4, 14) |
|
1,616 |
|
1,725 |
|
1,663 |
| |||
|
|
(Note 4) |
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
$ |
33,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(Note 15) |
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,776 |
| |||
Risk management |
|
(Note 22) |
|
1 |
|
65 |
|
126 |
| |||
Current debt |
|
(Note 17) |
|
492 |
|
500 |
|
200 |
| |||
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale |
|
(Note 10) |
|
17 |
|
- |
|
- |
| |||
|
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
2,834 |
|
4,283 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Long-Term Debt |
|
(Note 17) |
|
7,591 |
|
7,129 |
|
7,568 |
| |||
Other Liabilities and Provisions |
|
(Note 16) |
|
2,048 |
|
1,758 |
|
1,215 |
| |||
Risk Management |
|
(Note 22) |
|
6 |
|
8 |
|
42 |
| |||
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
(Note 18) |
|
1,043 |
|
953 |
|
819 |
| |||
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
(Note 8) |
|
4,086 |
|
4,068 |
|
3,360 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
17,594 |
|
16,750 |
|
17,287 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Share capital |
|
(Note 20) |
|
2,321 |
|
2,319 |
|
2,360 |
| |||
Paid in surplus |
|
(Notes 20, 21) |
|
4 |
|
- |
|
6 |
| |||
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
13,804 |
|
14,264 |
|
14,129 |
| |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
195 |
|
250 |
|
- |
| |||
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
16,324 |
|
16,833 |
|
16,495 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
$ |
33,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Approved by the Board
/s/ David P. OBrien |
/s/ Jane L. Peverett |
David P. OBrien |
Jane L. Peverett |
Director |
Director |
Encana Corporation |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the years ended December 31 (US$ millions) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 26) |
| ||
Share Capital |
|
(Note 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
Common Shares Issued under Option Plans |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
| ||
Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
| ||
Common Shares Purchased |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(48 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Paid in Surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Share-Based Compensation |
|
(Notes 20, 21) |
|
4 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Common Shares Purchased |
|
(Note 20) |
|
- |
|
|
(6 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
14,264 |
|
|
$ |
14,129 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
1,170 |
| ||
Dividends on Common Shares |
|
(Note 20) |
|
(588 |
) |
|
(590 |
) | ||
Charges for Normal Course Issuer Bid |
|
(Note 20) |
|
- |
|
|
(445 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
|
$ |
14,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
250 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
$ |
16,324 |
|
|
$ |
16,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Encana Corporation |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31 (US$ millions) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 26) |
| ||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
|
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
(Note 11) |
|
122 |
|
|
50 |
| ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(Note 12) |
|
3,423 |
|
|
3,318 |
| ||
Impairments |
|
(Note 12) |
|
1,304 |
|
|
496 |
| ||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(Note 5) |
|
(326 |
) |
|
(141 |
) | ||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
(Note 18) |
|
51 |
|
|
48 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(Note 8) |
|
48 |
|
|
640 |
| ||
Cash tax on sale of assets |
|
(Note 5) |
|
114 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Unrealized (gain) loss on risk management |
|
(Note 22) |
|
(879 |
) |
|
(945 |
) | ||
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
(Note 7) |
|
96 |
|
|
(278 |
) | ||
Other |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
79 |
| ||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
(84 |
) | ||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(Note 23) |
|
(38 |
) |
|
(1,990 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash From (Used In) Operating Activities |
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
2,363 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
|
(Notes 4, 11, 12) |
|
(4,578 |
) |
|
(4,764 |
) | ||
Acquisitions |
|
(Notes 5, 11, 12) |
|
(515 |
) |
|
(733 |
) | ||
Proceeds from divestitures |
|
(Notes 5, 11, 12) |
|
2,080 |
|
|
883 |
| ||
Cash tax on sale of assets |
|
(Note 5) |
|
(114 |
) |
|
- |
| ||
Net change in investments and other |
|
(Note 13) |
|
(578 |
) |
|
(80 |
) | ||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(Note 23) |
|
(20 |
) |
|
(33 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash From (Used in) Investing Activities |
|
|
|
(3,725 |
) |
|
(4,727 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Issuance of revolving debt |
|
(Note 17) |
|
13,606 |
|
|
1,660 |
| ||
Repayment of revolving debt |
|
(Note 17) |
|
(13,568 |
) |
|
(1,660 |
) | ||
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
(Note 17) |
|
989 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
(Note 17) |
|
(500 |
) |
|
(200 |
) | ||
Issuance of common shares |
|
(Note 20) |
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
| ||
Purchase of common shares |
|
(Note 20) |
|
- |
|
|
(499 |
) | ||
Dividends on common shares |
|
(Note 20) |
|
(588 |
) |
|
(590 |
) | ||
Finance lease payments |
|
(Note 12) |
|
(155 |
) |
|
- |
| ||
Cash From (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
(1,284 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss) on Cash and Cash |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
2 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
(3,646 |
) | ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
4,275 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
503 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplementary Cash Flow Information |
|
(Note 23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Encana Corporation |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
1. |
Corporate Information |
Encana Corporation and its subsidiaries (Encana or the Company) are in the business of the exploration for, the development of, and the production and marketing of natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs). The term liquids is used to represent Encanas oil, NGLs and condensate.
Encana Corporation is a publicly traded company, incorporated and domiciled in Canada. The address of its registered office is 1800, 855 2nd Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 2S5.
These Consolidated Financial Statements were approved and authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors (the Board) on February 23, 2012 and were signed on the Boards behalf by David P. OBrien and Jane L. Peverett.
2. |
Basis of Presentation |
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These are Encanas first audited annual Consolidated Financial Statements issued under IFRS and present the Companys financial results of operations and financial position as at and for the year ended December 31, 2011, including 2010 comparative periods. As a result, the Company has followed IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. Prior to 2011, the Company prepared its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (previous GAAP).
The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements under IFRS resulted in selected changes to Encanas accounting policies as compared to those disclosed in the Companys audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 issued under previous GAAP. A summary of the significant changes to Encanas accounting policies is disclosed in Note 26 along with reconciliations presenting the impact of the transition to IFRS for the comparative periods as at January 1, 2010 and as at and for the year ended December 31, 2010.
A summary of Encanas significant accounting policies under IFRS is presented in Note 3. These policies have been retrospectively and consistently applied except where specific exemptions permitted an alternative treatment upon transition to IFRS in accordance with IFRS 1, as disclosed in Note 26. These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain assets and liabilities as detailed in the Companys accounting policies presented in Note 3.
In these Consolidated Financial Statements, unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States (U.S.) dollars. Encanas functional currency is Canadian dollars; however, the Company has adopted the U.S. dollar as its presentation currency to facilitate a more direct comparison to other North American oil and gas companies. All references to US$ or to $ are to United States dollars and references to C$ are to Canadian dollars.
In December 2011, Encana announced that it will adopt U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for 2012 financial reporting. As a result, the Company will report its first quarter 2012 results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Reconciliations from IFRS to U.S. GAAP are included in Note 27 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
3. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
A) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Encana and its subsidiaries. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated on consolidation.
Interests in jointly controlled assets are accounted for using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby Encanas proportionate share of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are included in the accounts.
B) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
For the accounts of foreign operations, assets and liabilities are translated at period end exchange rates, while revenues and expenses are translated using average rates over the period. Translation gains and losses relating to the foreign operations are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders equity. As at December 31, 2011 and 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income is composed solely of foreign currency translation adjustments.
Monetary assets and liabilities of the Company that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated into its functional currency at the rates of exchange in effect at the period end date. Any gains or losses are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.
C) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
The timely preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires that Management make estimates and use judgment regarding the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, actual results may differ from estimated amounts as future confirming events occur. Significant estimates and judgments made by Management in the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements are outlined below.
Amounts recorded for depreciation, depletion and amortization and amounts used for impairment calculations are based on estimates of natural gas, oil and NGLs reserves. By their nature, the estimates of reserves, including the estimates of future prices, costs, discount rates and the related future cash flows, are subject to measurement uncertainty. Accordingly, the impact in the Consolidated Financial Statements of future periods could be material.
Upstream assets are aggregated into cash-generating units based on their ability to generate largely independent cash flows and are used for impairment testing. The determination of the Companys cash-generating units is subject to Managements judgment.
The decision to transfer assets from exploration and evaluation to property, plant and equipment or to expense capitalized exploration and evaluation assets is based on the estimated proved reserves used in the determination of an areas technical feasibility and commercial viability.
Amounts recorded for asset retirement costs and obligations and the related accretion expense requires the use of estimates with respect to the amounts and timing of asset retirements, site remediation and related cash flows. Other provisions are recognized in the period when it becomes probable that there will be a future cash outflow.
The estimated fair value of derivative instruments resulting in financial assets and liabilities, by their very nature, are subject to measurement uncertainty.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Compensation costs accrued for long-term stock-based compensation plans are subject to the estimation of what the ultimate payout will be using pricing models such as the Black-Scholes-Merton model. These models are based on significant assumptions such as volatility, dividend yield and expected term. Several compensation plans are also performance-based and are subject to Managements judgment as to whether or not the performance criteria will be met.
The values of pension assets and obligations and the amount of pension costs charged to net earnings depend on certain actuarial and economic assumptions which, by their nature, are subject to measurement uncertainty.
Tax interpretations, regulations and legislation in the various jurisdictions in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate are subject to change. As such, income taxes are subject to measurement uncertainty. Deferred income tax assets are assessed by Management at the end of the reporting period to determine the likelihood that they will be realized from future taxable earnings.
D) REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenues associated with the sales of Encanas natural gas and liquids are recognized when title passes from the Company to its customer. Realized gains and losses from the Companys commodity price risk management activities are recognized in revenue when the contract is settled. Unrealized gains and losses from the Companys commodity price risk management activities are recognized in revenue based on the changes in fair value of the contracts at the end of the respective periods.
Market optimization revenues and purchased product expenses are recorded on a gross basis when Encana takes title to the product and has the risks and rewards of ownership. Purchases and sales of products that are entered into in contemplation of each other with the same counterparty are recorded on a net basis. Revenues associated with the services provided where Encana acts as agent are recorded as the services are provided. Sales of electric power are recognized when power is provided to the customer.
E) PRODUCTION AND MINERAL TAXES
Costs paid by Encana to certain mineral and non-mineral interest owners based on production of natural gas and liquids are recognized when the product is produced.
F) TRANSPORTATION COSTS
Costs paid by Encana for the transportation of natural gas and liquids are recognized when the product is delivered and the services provided.
G) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors defined contribution and defined benefit plans, providing pension and other post-employment benefits to its employees in Canada and the U.S. As of January 1, 2003, the defined benefit pension plan was closed to new entrants.
Pension expense for the defined contribution pension plan is recorded as the benefits are earned by the employees covered by the plans. Encana accrues for its obligations under its defined benefit plan and the related costs, net of plan assets.
The cost of defined benefit pensions and other post-employment benefits is actuarially determined using the projected unit credit method based on length of service and reflects Managements best estimate of salary escalation, retirement ages of employees and expected future health care costs. The expected return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for assets in the investment plan portfolio. The actual return on plan assets is based on the fair value of those assets. The accrued benefit obligation is discounted using the market interest rate on high-quality corporate debt instruments as at the measurement date.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Pension expense for the defined benefit pension plan includes the cost of pension benefits earned during the current year, the interest cost on pension obligations, the expected return on pension plan assets, the amortization of adjustments arising from pension plan amendments and the amortization of the excess of the net actuarial gain or loss over 10 percent of the greater of the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets. Amortization is done on a straight-line basis over a period covering the expected average remaining service lives of employees covered by the plans.
H) INCOME TAXES
Income tax is recognized in net earnings except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in shareholders equity, in which case the income tax is recognized directly in shareholders equity. Current income taxes are measured at the amount expected to be recoverable from or payable to the taxation authorities based on the income tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the end of the reporting period and reflect adjustments relating to prior periods.
Encana follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recorded for the effect of any temporary difference between the accounting and income tax basis of an asset or liability.
Deferred income tax is calculated using the enacted or substantively enacted income tax rates expected to apply when the assets are realized or liabilities are settled. The effect of a change in the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates is recognized in net earnings or in shareholders equity depending on the item to which the adjustment relates.
Deferred income tax liabilities and assets are not recognized for temporary differences arising on:
· |
Investments in subsidiaries and associates and interests in joint ventures where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled by the Company and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future; |
· |
The initial recognition of goodwill; or |
· |
The initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting net earnings nor taxable earnings. |
Deferred income tax assets are recognized to the extent future recovery is probable. Deferred income tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable earnings will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
I) EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS
Basic net earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For the diluted net earnings per common share calculation, the weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted for the potential number of shares, which may have a dilutive effect on net earnings.
Diluted net earnings per common share is calculated giving effect to the potential dilution that would occur if outstanding stock options or potentially dilutive share units were exercised or converted to common shares. Potentially dilutive share units include tandem stock appreciation rights (TSARs), performance TSARs and restricted share units (RSUs). The weighted average number of diluted shares is calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method assumes that the proceeds received from the exercise of all potentially dilutive instruments are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price.
For share units issued that may be settled in cash or shares at Encanas option and where there is no obligation to settle in cash, the share units are accounted for as equity-settled share-based payment transactions and included in diluted earnings per share if the effect is dilutive.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
For share units issued that may be settled in cash or shares at the employees option, the more dilutive of cash-settled and equity-settled is used in calculating diluted net earnings per common share regardless of how the compensation plan is accounted for. Accordingly, share units that are reported as cash-settled for accounting purposes may require an adjustment to the numerator for any changes in net earnings that would result if the share units had been reported as equity instruments for the purposes of calculating diluted net earnings per common share.
J) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments, such as money market deposits or similar type instruments, with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.
K) UPSTREAM ASSETS
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION
All costs directly associated with the exploration and evaluation of natural gas and liquids reserves are initially capitalized. Exploration and evaluation costs are those expenditures for an area where technical feasibility and commercial viability has not yet been determined. These costs include unproved property acquisition costs, geological and geophysical costs, asset retirement costs, exploration and evaluation drilling, sampling and appraisals. Costs incurred prior to acquiring the legal rights to explore an area are charged directly to net earnings as exploration and evaluation expense.
When an area is determined to be technically feasible and commercially viable, the accumulated costs are transferred to property, plant and equipment. When an area is determined not to be technically feasible and commercially viable or the Company decides not to continue with its activity, the unrecoverable costs are charged to net earnings as exploration and evaluation expense.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
All costs directly associated with the development of natural gas and liquids reserves are capitalized on an area-by-area basis. Development costs include expenditures for areas where technical feasibility and commercial viability has been determined. These costs include proved property acquisitions, development drilling, completions, gathering and infrastructure, asset retirement costs and transfers of exploration and evaluation assets, less impairments recognized.
Costs accumulated within each area are depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves using estimated future prices and costs. Costs subject to depletion include estimated future costs to be incurred in developing proved reserves. Costs of major development projects are excluded from the costs subject to depletion until they are available for use.
For divestitures of properties, a gain or loss is recognized in net earnings. Exchanges of properties are measured at fair value, unless the transaction lacks commercial substance or fair value cannot be reliably measured. Where the exchange is measured at fair value, a gain or loss is recognized in net earnings.
L) OTHER PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
MARKET OPTIMIZATION
Midstream facilities, including power generation facilities, are carried at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the assets, which range from 20 to 25 years.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
CORPORATE
Costs associated with office furniture, fixtures, leasehold improvements, information technology and aircraft are carried at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the assets, which range from three to 25 years. Assets under construction are not subject to depreciation until put into use. Land is carried at cost.
M) CAPITALIZATION OF COSTS
Expenditures related to renewals or betterments that improve the productive capacity or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Borrowing costs are capitalized during the construction phase of qualifying assets.
N) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The acquired identifiable net assets are measured at their fair value at the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recognized as goodwill. Any deficiency of the purchase price below the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as a gain in net earnings. Associated transaction costs are expensed when incurred.
O) GOODWILL
Upon acquisition, goodwill is attributed to the applicable cash-generating unit or aggregated cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combinations synergies. Goodwill is attributed to the aggregated cash-generating units that collectively form the respective Canadian and USA Divisions. This represents the lowest level that goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Subsequent measurement of goodwill is at cost less any accumulated impairments.
Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually at December 31. If the goodwill carrying amount for each Division exceeds the recoverable amount of the Division, the associated goodwill is written down with an impairment recognized in net earnings. The recoverable amounts are determined annually based on the greater of fair value less costs to sell or value in use. Fair value less costs to sell is derived by estimating the discounted after-tax future net cash flows for the aggregated cash-generating units. Discounted future net cash flows are based on forecast commodity prices and costs over the expected economic life of the proved and probable reserves and discounted using market-based rates. Value in use is determined by estimating the present value of the future net cash flows expected to be derived from the continued use of the aggregated cash-generating units.
The Companys reserves are evaluated annually by independent qualified reserves evaluators (IQREs). The cash flows used in determining the recoverable amounts are based on information contained in the IQREs reserves reports and Managements assumptions based on past experience.
Goodwill impairments are not reversed.
P) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-TERM ASSETS
The carrying value of long-term assets, excluding goodwill, is reviewed quarterly for indicators that the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating unit may not be recoverable. If indicators of impairment exist, the recoverable amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is estimated. If the carrying value of the asset or cash-generating unit exceeds the recoverable amount, the asset or cash-generating unit is written down with an impairment recognized in net earnings.
Upstream assets, including exploration and evaluation costs and development costs, are aggregated into cash-generating units based on their ability to generate largely independent cash inflows.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its fair value less costs to sell or its value in use. Fair value is determined to be the amount for which the asset could be sold in an arms length transaction.
For upstream assets, fair value less costs to sell may be determined using after-tax discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs. Value in use is determined by estimating the present value of the future net cash flows expected to be derived from the continued use of the cash-generating unit.
Reversals of impairments are recognized when there has been a subsequent increase in the recoverable amount. In this event, the carrying amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is increased to its revised recoverable amount with an impairment reversal recognized in net earnings. The recoverable amount is limited to the original carrying amount less depreciation, depletion and amortization as if no impairment had been recognized for the asset or cash-generating unit for prior periods.
Q) ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Non-current assets, or disposal groups consisting of assets and liabilities, are classified as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is met when the sale is highly probable and the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition.
Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, with impairments recognized in net earnings in the period measured. Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale are presented in current assets and liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Assets held for sale are not depreciated, depleted or amortized.
R) PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENCIES
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are measured based on the discounted expected future cash outflows.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
Asset retirement obligations include present obligations where the Company will be required to retire tangible long-lived assets such as producing well sites, offshore production platforms and natural gas processing plants. The asset retirement obligation is measured at the present value of the expenditure to be incurred. The associated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset. Changes in the estimated obligation resulting from revisions to estimated timing, amount of cash flows, or changes in the discount rate are recognized as a change in the asset retirement obligation and the related asset retirement cost.
Amortization of asset retirement costs are included in depreciation, depletion and amortization in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Increases in the asset retirement obligations resulting from the passage of time are recorded as accretion of asset retirement obligation in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.
Actual expenditures incurred are charged against the asset retirement obligation.
CONTINGENCIES
When a contingency is substantiated by confirming events, can be reliably measured and will likely result in an economic outflow, a liability is recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements as the best estimate required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of an obligation will only be confirmed by future events, or where the amount of a present obligation cannot be measured reliably or will likely not result in an economic outflow. Contingent assets are only disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
When the economic benefit becomes virtually certain, the asset is no longer contingent and is recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
S) SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Obligations for payments of cash or common shares under Encanas stock-based compensation plans are accrued over the vesting period using fair values. Fair values are determined using observable share prices and/or pricing models such as the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. For equity-settled stock-based compensation plans, fair values are determined at the grant date and are recognized as compensation costs with a corresponding credit to shareholders equity. For cash-settled stock-based compensation plans, fair values are determined at each reporting date and periodic changes are recognized as compensation costs, with a corresponding change to current liabilities.
Obligations for payments for share units of Cenovus Energy Inc. (Cenovus) held by Encana employees are accrued as compensation costs based on the fair value of the financial liability.
T) LEASES
Leases or other arrangements entered into for the use of an asset are classified as either finance or operating leases. Finance leases transfer to the Company substantially all of the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item. Finance leases are capitalized at the commencement of the lease term at the lower of the fair value of the leased asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. Capitalized leased assets are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets and the lease term. All other leases are classified as operating leases and the payments are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
U) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments are measured at fair value on initial recognition of the instrument. Measurement in subsequent periods depends on whether the financial instrument has been classified as fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, or financial liabilities measured at amortized cost as defined by the accounting standard.
Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are either classified as held for trading or designated at fair value through profit or loss and are measured at fair value with changes in those fair values recognized in net earnings. Financial assets classified as loans and receivables, held-to-maturity, and financial liabilities measured at amortized cost are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method of amortization. Financial assets classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in other comprehensive income.
The Companys financial assets, excluding derivative instruments, are classified as loans and receivables. Financial liabilities, excluding derivative instruments, are classified as financial liabilities measured at amortized cost. All derivative instruments are classified as held for trading.
Encana capitalizes long-term debt transaction costs, premiums and discounts. These costs are capitalized within long-term debt and amortized using the effective interest method.
RISK MANAGEMENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Risk management assets and liabilities are derivative financial instruments classified as held for trading and are recorded at fair value. These instruments are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as either an asset or liability with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings. Realized gains or losses from financial derivatives related to natural gas and oil commodity prices are recognized in revenue as the contracts are settled. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in revenue at the end of each respective reporting period based on the changes in fair value of the contracts. Realized gains or losses from financial derivatives related to power commodity prices are recognized in operating costs as the related power contracts are settled.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The estimated fair value of all derivative instruments is based on quoted market prices or, in their absence, third-party market indications and forecasts.
Derivative financial instruments are used by Encana to manage economic exposure to market risks relating to commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The Companys policy is not to utilize derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
V) NEW PRONOUNCEMENTS ADOPTED
Accounting standards effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2011 have been adopted as part of the transition to IFRS.
W) RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ISSUED
As of January 1, 2013, the following standards and amendments issued by the IASB become effective:
· |
IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, which is the result of the IASBs project to replace Standing Interpretations Committee 12, Consolidation Special Purpose Entities and the consolidation requirements of IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The new standard eliminates the current risk and rewards approach and establishes control as the single basis for determining the consolidation of an entity. |
|
|
· |
IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, which is the result of the IASBs project to replace IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures. The new standard redefines joint operations and joint ventures and requires joint operations to be proportionately consolidated and joint ventures to be equity accounted. Under IAS 31, joint ventures could be proportionately consolidated. |
|
|
· |
IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, which outlines the required disclosures for interests in subsidiaries and joint arrangements. The new disclosures require information that will assist financial statement users to evaluate the nature, risks and financial effects associated with an entitys interests in subsidiaries and joint arrangements. |
|
|
· |
IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement, which provides a common definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under IFRS and enhances the disclosures required for fair value measurements. The standard applies where fair value measurements are required and does not require new fair value measurements. |
|
|
· |
IAS 19, Employee Benefits, which amends the recognition and measurement of defined benefit pension expense and expands disclosures for all employee benefit plans. |
|
|
· |
IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures, which requires disclosure of both gross and net information about financial instruments eligible for offset in the balance sheet and financial instruments subject to master netting arrangements. Concurrent with the amendments to IFRS 7, the IASB also amended IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation to clarify the existing requirements for offsetting financial instruments in the balance sheet. The amendments to IAS 32 are effective as of January 1, 2014. |
As of January 1, 2015, the following standard issued by the IASB becomes effective:
· |
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, which is the result of the first phase of the IASBs project to replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The new standard replaces the current multiple classification and measurement models for financial assets and liabilities with a single model that has only two classification categories: amortized cost and fair value. The impairment and hedge accounting principles to be included in IFRS 9 have not yet been issued by the IASB. |
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
As disclosed in Note 2, Encana is adopting U.S. GAAP and will be reporting its first quarter 2012 results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As a result, the above new IASB standards and amendments will not be adopted. If Encana continued to report under IFRS, the Company expects that the new IASB standards and amendments would not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
4. Segmented Information
Encana is organized into Divisions which represent the Companys operating and reportable segments as follows:
· |
Canadian Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of natural gas, oil and NGLs and other related activities within Canada. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Greater Sierra in northeast British Columbia, including Horn River; (ii) Cutbank Ridge in Alberta and British Columbia, including Montney; (iii) Bighorn in west central Alberta; and (iv) Coalbed Methane in southern Alberta. The Canadian Division also includes the Deep Panuke natural gas project offshore Nova Scotia. |
|
|
· |
USA Division includes the exploration for, development of, and production of natural gas, oil and NGLs and other related activities within the U.S. Four key resource plays are located in the Division: (i) Jonah in southwest Wyoming; (ii) Piceance in northwest Colorado; (iii) Haynesville in Louisiana; and (iv) Texas, including East Texas and North Texas. |
|
|
· |
Market Optimization is primarily responsible for the sale of the Companys proprietary production. These results are included in the Canadian and USA Divisions. Market optimization activities include third-party purchases and sales of product that provide operational flexibility for transportation commitments, product type, delivery points and customer diversification. These activities are reflected in the Market Optimization segment. |
|
|
· |
Corporate and Other mainly includes unrealized gains or losses recorded on derivative financial instruments. Once amounts are settled, the realized gains and losses are recorded in the operating segment to which the derivative instrument relates. |
Market Optimization sells substantially all of the Companys upstream production to third-party customers. Transactions between segments are based on market values and eliminated on consolidation. The tables in this note present financial information on an after eliminations basis.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
|
|
Canadian Division |
|
|
USA Division |
|
|
Market Optimization |
| ||||||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
|
$ |
2,872 |
|
|
$ |
2,829 |
|
|
$ |
4,022 |
|
|
$ |
4,275 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
15 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
183 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Transportation |
|
|
250 |
|
|
197 |
|
|
728 |
|
|
662 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Operating |
|
|
613 |
|
|
559 |
|
|
444 |
|
|
467 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
34 |
| ||||||
Purchased product |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
635 |
|
|
739 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
24 |
| ||||||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
9 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
11 |
| ||||||
Impairments |
|
|
199 |
|
|
496 |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
(86 |
) |
|
(323 |
) |
|
(53 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
|
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
| ||||||||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
8,467 |
|
|
$ |
8,870 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
198 |
|
|
217 |
| ||||||||||||
Transportation |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
978 |
|
|
859 |
| ||||||||||||
Operating |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
1,060 |
| ||||||||||||
Purchased product |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
635 |
|
|
739 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
969 |
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
5,995 |
| ||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
- |
|
|
10 |
|
|
142 |
|
|
65 |
| ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
78 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
3,318 |
| ||||||||||||
Impairments |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
496 |
| ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
|
5 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
(326 |
) |
|
(141 |
) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
2,257 |
| ||||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
48 |
| ||||||||||||
Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
361 |
| ||||||||||||
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
501 |
| ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
(250 |
) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
660 |
| ||||||||||||
Net Earnings Before Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1,597 |
| ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
427 |
| ||||||||||||
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
PRODUCT AND DIVISIONAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Canadian Division |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Other |
| |||||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
|
$ |
2,376 |
|
|
$ |
2,480 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
10 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Transportation |
|
|
245 |
|
|
194 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Operating |
|
|
589 |
|
|
528 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
| ||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
$ |
1,532 |
|
|
$ |
1,751 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,872 |
|
|
$ |
2,829 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
8 |
| ||||||
Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
197 |
| ||||||
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
559 |
| ||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,994 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
USA Division |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Oil & NGLs |
|
|
Other |
| |||||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
|
$ |
3,664 |
|
|
$ |
3,912 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
157 |
|
|
185 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Transportation |
|
|
728 |
|
|
662 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Operating |
|
|
423 |
|
|
391 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
18 |
|
|
76 |
| ||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
$ |
2,356 |
|
|
$ |
2,674 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,022 |
|
|
$ |
4,275 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
209 |
| ||||||
Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
662 |
| ||||||
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
467 |
| ||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canadian Division |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
2,206 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
2,423 |
|
|
2,495 |
| ||
Market Optimization |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
| ||
Corporate & Other |
|
|
131 |
|
|
61 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
4,578 |
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
Capital expenditures include capitalized exploration and evaluation costs and property, plant and equipment (See Notes 11 and 12).
ASSETS BY SEGMENT
|
|
|
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Canadian Division |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
10,937 |
|
|
$ |
11,678 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
901 |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
11,146 |
|
|
12,922 |
| ||||
Market Optimization |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
108 |
|
|
121 |
| ||||
Corporate & Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
1,424 |
| ||||
|
|
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,158 |
|
|
$ |
23,913 |
|
|
$ |
26,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Total Assets |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Canadian Division |
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
|
$ |
14,817 |
|
|
$ |
14,422 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
445 |
|
|
473 |
|
|
13,586 |
|
|
15,157 |
| ||||
Market Optimization |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
159 |
|
|
193 |
| ||||
Corporate & Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
3,811 |
| ||||
|
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION
|
|
|
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Canada |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
12,705 |
|
|
$ |
13,173 |
|
United States |
|
|
901 |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
11,208 |
|
|
12,972 |
| ||||
Other Countries |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||
Total |
|
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,158 |
|
|
$ |
23,913 |
|
|
$ |
26,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Total Assets |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Canada |
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
|
$ |
19,862 |
|
|
$ |
18,115 |
|
United States |
|
|
445 |
|
|
473 |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
15,437 |
| ||||
Other Countries |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
56 |
|
|
31 |
| ||||
Total |
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
EXPORT SALES
Sales of natural gas, oil and NGLs produced or purchased in Canada delivered to customers outside of Canada were $266 million (2010 $292 million).
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
MAJOR CUSTOMERS
In connection with the marketing and sale of Encanas produced and purchased natural gas, oil and NGLs for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company had one customer (2010 one) which individually accounted for more than 10 percent of Encanas consolidated revenues, net of royalties. Sales to this customer, which has a high-quality investment grade credit rating, were approximately $831 million (2010 $1,055 million). Of this amount, $359 million (2010 $320 million) was recorded in the Canadian Division and $472 million (2010 $735 million) was recorded in the USA Division.
5. Acquisitions and Divestitures
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canadian Division |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
USA Division |
|
|
105 |
|
|
141 |
| ||
Total Acquisitions |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
733 |
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canadian Division |
|
|
$ |
(350 |
) |
|
$ |
(288 |
) |
USA Division |
|
|
(1,730 |
) |
|
(595 |
) | ||
Total Divestitures |
|
|
$ |
(2,080 |
) |
|
$ |
(883 |
) |
ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions in the Canadian and USA Divisions primarily include the purchase of various strategic exploration and evaluation lands and properties that complement existing assets within Encanas portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2011, acquisitions totaled $515 million (2010 $733 million).
DIVESTITURES
Divestitures in the Canadian and USA Divisions primarily include the sale of non-core assets. For the year ended December 31, 2011, these Divisions received total proceeds on the sale of assets of $2,080 million (2010 $883 million), resulting in a net gain on divestitures of $331 million (2010 net gain of $139 million).
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Canadian Division sold its interest in the Cabin natural gas processing plant for proceeds of $48 million and the USA Division sold its Fort Lupton natural gas processing plant for proceeds of $296 million, its South Piceance natural gas gathering assets for proceeds of $547 million and its North Texas natural gas producing properties for proceeds of $836 million. Cash taxes increased by $114 million as a result of the sale of the South Piceance assets and the North Texas assets. See Note 10 for further information relating to the sale of the North Texas assets.
Divestiture amounts above are net of amounts recovered for capital expenditures incurred prior to the sale of certain natural gas gathering and processing assets.
6. Interest
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Expense Debt |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
Interest Expense Other |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
16 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
7. Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss, Net
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Translation of U.S. dollar debt issued from Canada |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
(282 |
) |
Translation of U.S. dollar risk management contracts issued from Canada |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
4 |
| ||
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
(278 |
) | ||
Settlement of Intercompany Transactions and Net Investment in Foreign Operations |
|
|
55 |
|
|
2 |
| ||
Non-operating Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss |
|
|
151 |
|
|
(276 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Monetary revaluations and settlements |
|
|
19 |
|
|
26 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
(250 |
) |
8. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is as follows:
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canada |
|
|
$ |
(324 |
) |
|
$ |
(213 |
) |
United States |
|
|
116 |
|
|
1 |
| ||
Other Countries |
|
|
71 |
|
|
70 |
| ||
Adjustment in respect of prior periods |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
(71 |
) | ||
Total Current Tax Expense (Recovery) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
(213 |
) | ||
Deferred Tax on the origination and reversal of temporary differences |
|
|
42 |
|
|
564 |
| ||
Adjustment in respect of prior periods |
|
|
6 |
|
|
76 |
| ||
Total Deferred Tax Expense |
|
|
48 |
|
|
640 |
| ||
Income Tax Expense (Recovery) |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
427 |
|
The current and deferred tax amounts in respect of prior periods arose from adjustments to estimates and income tax reassessments received during the year.
The following table reconciles income taxes calculated at the Canadian statutory rate with the actual income taxes:
For the years ended December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings Before Income Tax |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
Canadian Statutory Rate |
|
|
26.5% |
|
|
28.2% |
| ||
Expected Income Tax |
|
|
1 |
|
|
450 |
| ||
Effect on Taxes Resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Statutory and other rate differences |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
50 |
| ||
Effect of legislative changes |
|
|
- |
|
|
6 |
| ||
International financing |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
(78 |
) | ||
Foreign exchange (gains) losses not included in net earnings |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
6 |
| ||
Non-taxable capital (gains) losses |
|
|
20 |
|
|
(38 |
) | ||
Other |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
31 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
427 |
|
The Canadian statutory tax rate decreased to 26.5% in 2011 from 28.2% in 2010 as a result of tax legislation enacted in 2007.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The deferred tax charged (credited) to the Statement of Earnings and the net deferred income tax liability consists of the following:
|
|
|
Statement of Earnings |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
| ||||||||||
For the years ended / As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
Risk management |
|
|
266 |
|
|
294 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
377 |
| ||||
Unrealized foreign exchange gain |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
27 |
|
|
182 |
|
|
240 |
| ||||
Timing of partnership items |
|
|
- |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||
Other |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
3 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-capital and operating losses |
|
|
164 |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
(119 |
) |
|
(285 |
) | ||||
Alternative minimum and foreign tax credits |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
(38 |
) |
|
(152 |
) |
|
(38 |
) | ||||
Compensation plans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
(94 |
) | ||||
Accrued and unpaid expenses |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
(75 |
) |
|
(82 |
) | ||||
Other |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
(14 |
) |
|
(91 |
) |
|
(25 |
) | ||||
Net Deferred Income Tax |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
4,086 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Analysis of movements in the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
As at January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
|
$ |
3,360 |
| ||
Charged (credited) to net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
640 |
| ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
68 |
| ||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,086 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
Net deferred income tax liabilities of approximately 12 percent are expected to reverse within 12 months.
The aggregate temporary difference associated with investments in subsidiaries for which no deferred tax liabilities have been recognized is $7.2 billion (2010 $6.8 billion).
The approximate amounts of tax pools available are summarized below. Deferred tax assets have been recognized for all of the tax pools. Included in the tax pools are $476 million (2010 $978 million) related to non-capital and net capital losses available for carry forward to reduce taxable income in future years. The non-capital losses expire between 2015 and 2031.
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canada |
|
|
$ |
7,852 |
|
|
$ |
8,086 |
|
United States |
|
|
5,037 |
|
|
6,200 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
12,889 |
|
|
$ |
14,286 |
|
9. Accounts Receivable and Accrued Revenues
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade Receivables and Accrued Revenues |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
Prepaids and Other Deposits |
|
|
101 |
|
|
123 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
Current trade and other receivables are non-interest bearing.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The analysis of trade receivables and accrued revenues that are past due but not impaired is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due but not impaired |
| |||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
Total |
|
Neither past due |
|
30 to 60 days |
|
61 to 120 days |
|
Over 120 days |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
2011 |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
$ |
889 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
$ |
893 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
40 |
|
In determining the recoverability of trade receivables that are past due but not impaired, the Company considers the age of the outstanding receivable and the credit worthiness of the counterparties. See Note 22 for further information about credit risk.
10. Assets Held for Sale
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Canadian |
|
USA |
|
|
Total |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Assets Held for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Exploration and evaluation (See Note 11) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (See Note 12) |
|
621 |
|
116 |
|
|
737 |
| |||
Goodwill (See Note 14) |
|
54 |
|
- |
|
|
54 |
| |||
|
|
$ |
677 |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Liabilities Associated with Assets Held for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Asset retirement obligation (See Note 18) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
On December 7, 2011, Encana announced that it had agreed to sell two natural gas processing plants in the Cutbank Ridge area of British Columbia and Alberta for approximately C$920 million. The assets of $352 million and associated liabilities of $16 million represent a disposal group within the Companys Canadian Division and are presented as held for sale as at December 31, 2011. The sale closed on February 9, 2012 and the proceeds have been received.
On November 3, 2011, Encana announced that it had agreed to sell the Companys North Texas natural gas producing assets in the Fort Worth Basin. On December 22, 2011, Encana further announced the majority of the sale had closed and the Company has received net proceeds of approximately $836 million. The remaining assets of $116 million and associated liabilities of $1 million represent a disposal group within the Companys USA Division and are presented as held for sale as at December 31, 2011. On February 7, 2012, Encana received additional proceeds of $91 million. The remainder of the sale, for proceeds of approximately $24 million, is subject to completion of additional closing conditions and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2012.
During 2011, Encana entered into negotiations with Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi) to jointly develop certain undeveloped lands owned by Encana. On February 17, 2012, Encana announced that the Company and Mitsubishi had entered into a partnership agreement for the development of Cutbank Ridge lands in British Columbia. Under the agreement, Encana will own 60 percent and Mitsubishi will own 40 percent of the partnership. Mitsubishi will pay approximately C$1.45 billion on closing and will invest approximately C$1.45 billion in addition to its 40 percent of the partnerships future capital investment for a commitment period, which is expected to be about five years, thereby reducing Encanas capital funding commitments to 30 percent of the total expected capital investment over that period. The transaction does not include any of Encanas current Cutbank Ridge production, processing plants, gathering systems or the Companys Alberta landholdings. As at December 31, 2011, assets of $325 million related to this transaction represent a disposal group within the Companys Canadian Division and are presented as held for sale. The transaction is expected to close by the end of February 2012.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
11. Exploration and Evaluation |
|
|
Canadian |
|
USA |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ 729 |
|
$ 1,146 |
|
$ 10 |
|
$ 1,885 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
74 |
|
342 |
|
- |
|
416 |
|
Transfers to property, plant and equipment (See Note 12) |
|
- |
|
(303 |
) |
- |
|
(303 |
) |
Exploration and evaluation expense |
|
- |
|
(40 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(50 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
282 |
|
96 |
|
- |
|
378 |
|
Divestitures |
|
(16 |
) |
(199 |
) |
- |
|
(215 |
) |
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
45 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
47 |
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ 1,114 |
|
$ 1,044 |
|
$ - |
|
$ 2,158 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
174 |
|
180 |
|
- |
|
354 |
|
Transfers to property, plant and equipment (See Note 12) |
|
- |
|
(236 |
) |
- |
|
(236 |
) |
Exploration and evaluation expense |
|
- |
|
(122 |
) |
- |
|
(122 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
332 |
|
53 |
|
- |
|
385 |
|
Divestitures |
|
(27 |
) |
(19 |
) |
- |
|
(46 |
) |
Reclassification to assets held for sale (See Note 10) |
|
(2 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(2 |
) |
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
(34 |
) |
1 |
|
- |
|
(33 |
) |
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
$ 1,557 |
|
$ 901 |
|
$ - |
|
$ 2,458 |
|
During 2011, $122 million in previously capitalized exploration and evaluation costs primarily related to the West Texas assets were deemed not commercially viable and were recognized as exploration and evaluation expense.
During 2011, $20 million in costs were charged directly to exploration and evaluation expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings (2010 $15 million).
During 2010, $50 million in previously capitalized exploration and evaluation costs related to the Marcellus and Greenland assets were deemed not commercially viable and were recognized as exploration and evaluation expense.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
12. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
Cost
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
USA |
|
Market |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
$ |
22,143 |
|
$ |
19,875 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
$ |
43,471 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2,132 |
|
2,153 |
|
2 |
|
61 |
|
4,348 |
| |||||
Transfers from exploration and evaluation (See Note 11) |
|
|
- |
|
303 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
303 |
| |||||
Acquisitions |
|
|
362 |
|
122 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
484 |
| |||||
Divestitures |
|
|
(630 |
) |
(752 |
) |
- |
|
1 |
|
(1,381 |
) | |||||
Change in asset retirement cost |
|
|
151 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
153 |
| |||||
Assets under construction |
|
|
101 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
393 |
|
494 |
| |||||
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
1,204 |
|
- |
|
11 |
|
76 |
|
1,291 |
| |||||
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
$ |
25,463 |
|
$ |
21,703 |
|
$ |
227 |
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
$ |
49,163 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,848 |
|
2,243 |
|
2 |
|
131 |
|
4,224 |
| |||||
Transfers from exploration and evaluation (See Note 11) |
|
|
- |
|
236 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
236 |
| |||||
Acquisitions |
|
|
157 |
|
83 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
242 |
| |||||
Divestitures |
|
|
(864 |
) |
(2,461 |
) |
- |
|
(4 |
) |
(3,329 |
) | |||||
Change in asset retirement cost |
|
|
112 |
|
73 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
185 |
| |||||
Reclassification to assets held for sale (See Note 10) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
(225 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(965 |
) | |||||
Assets under finance lease |
|
|
- |
|
158 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
158 |
| |||||
Assets under construction |
|
|
79 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
251 |
|
330 |
| |||||
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
(609 |
) |
1 |
|
(6 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(661 |
) | |||||
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
$ |
25,446 |
|
$ |
21,811 |
|
$ |
223 |
|
$ |
2,103 |
|
$ |
49,583 |
|
Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
USA |
|
Market |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
$ |
11,710 |
|
$ |
7,092 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
19,183 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
1,286 |
|
1,954 |
|
11 |
|
67 |
|
3,318 |
| |||||
Impairments |
|
|
496 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
496 |
| |||||
Divestitures |
|
|
(364 |
) |
(285 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(649 |
) | |||||
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
657 |
|
20 |
|
5 |
|
(12 |
) |
670 |
| |||||
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
$ |
13,785 |
|
$ |
8,781 |
|
$ |
106 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
23,018 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
1,411 |
|
1,922 |
|
12 |
|
78 |
|
3,423 |
| |||||
Impairments |
|
|
199 |
|
1,105 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,304 |
| |||||
Reclassification to assets held for sale (See Note 10) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
(109 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(228 |
) | |||||
Divestitures |
|
|
(448 |
) |
(1,051 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(1,499 |
) | |||||
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
(319 |
) |
17 |
|
(3 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(348 |
) | |||||
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
$ |
14,509 |
|
$ |
10,665 |
|
$ |
115 |
|
$ |
381 |
|
$ |
25,670 |
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
USA |
|
Market |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
$ |
10,433 |
|
$ |
12,783 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
948 |
|
$ |
24,288 |
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
$ |
11,678 |
|
$ |
12,922 |
|
$ |
121 |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
$ |
26,145 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
$ |
10,937 |
|
$ |
11,146 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
$ |
1,722 |
|
$ |
23,913 |
|
During 2011, the Company entered into a finance lease arrangement whereby the beneficial rights of ownership of specific equipment will be conveyed to Encana over the next five years. The Company recorded an asset under finance lease with a corresponding finance lease obligation totaling $158 million. Subsequent to entering into the arrangement, $155 million of the finance lease obligation was paid by Encana. As at December 31, 2011, the carrying value of the equipment under finance lease is $147 million.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
At December 31, 2011, Encana recognized a $199 million impairment (2010 $496 million) relating to the Companys Canadian offshore natural gas assets. The impairments resulted primarily from the decline in forecast natural gas prices.
At December 31, 2011, Encana recognized a $1,092 million impairment (2010 nil) relating to the Companys East Texas natural gas producing assets. The impairment resulted from the decline in forecast natural gas prices and a change in future development plans.
The impairments relate to specific cash-generating units and were based on the difference between the net book value of the assets and the recoverable amounts. The recoverable amounts were determined using fair value less costs to sell based on discounted after-tax future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs. The future net cash flows were discounted using 10 percent. The forecast prices used to determine fair value reflect the following benchmark prices, adjusted for basis differentials to determine local reference prices, transportation costs and tariffs, heat content, and quality.
(average for the period) |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 - 2021 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AECO (C$/MMBtu) |
|
3.49 |
|
4.13 |
|
4.59 |
|
5.05 |
|
5.51 |
|
5.97 - 6.58 |
|
+2%/year |
|
Henry Hub ($/MMBtu) |
|
3.80 |
|
4.50 |
|
5.00 |
|
5.50 |
|
6.00 |
|
6.50 - 7.17 |
|
+2%/year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edmonton Light Sweet (C$/bbl) |
|
97.96 |
|
101.02 |
|
101.02 |
|
101.02 |
|
101.02 |
|
101.02 - 108.73 |
|
+2%/year |
|
WTI ($/bbl) |
|
97.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
100.00 - 107.56 |
|
+2%/year |
|
In December 2011, Encana announced that the sale of the North Texas natural gas producing assets had been partially completed. The remaining assets to be divested in the transaction have been written down to fair value and the Company has recognized an impairment of $13 million. The remaining assets have been classified as held for sale as disclosed in Note 10.
In 2008, Encana signed a contract for the design and construction of the Production Field Centre (PFC) for the Deep Panuke project. As at December 31, 2011, the Canadian Division property, plant, and equipment and total assets includes Encanas accrual to date of $607 million (2010 $528 million) related to this offshore facility as an asset under construction.
In 2007, Encana announced that it had entered into a 25 year lease agreement with a third-party developer for The Bow office project. As at December 31, 2011, Corporate and Other property, plant, and equipment and total assets includes Encanas accrual to date of $1,309 million (2010 $1,090 million) related to this office project as an asset under construction.
Corresponding liabilities for the PFC and The Bow office project are included in other liabilities and provisions in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and as disclosed in Note 16. There is no effect on the Companys current net earnings or cash flows related to the capitalization of the PFC or The Bow office project.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
13. Investments and Other Assets |
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Held in Escrow |
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
Long-Term Receivable |
|
83 |
|
|
80 |
| ||
Long-Term Investments and Other |
|
211 |
|
|
30 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
Cash held in escrow represents restricted cash that is not available for general operating use. This amount includes monies received from counterparties related to jointly controlled assets totaling $69 million and $400 million, which has been placed in escrow for a possible qualifying like-kind exchange for U.S. tax purposes.
14. Goodwill |
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canadian Division |
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
USA Division |
|
445 |
|
|
473 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
Goodwill associated with the Canadian Divisions Cutbank Ridge assets held for sale, as disclosed in Note 10, reduced the goodwill balance by $54 million as at December 31, 2011. Goodwill associated with the divestiture of the North Texas assets in the USA Division, as disclosed in Note 5, reduced the goodwill balance by $28 million as at December 31, 2011. Goodwill was not associated with the divestiture of any other assets in the Canadian Division or the USA Division in 2011 or 2010. The remaining change in the Canadian Divisions goodwill balance reflects movements due to foreign currency translation.
Goodwill was assessed for impairment as at December 31, 2011. The recoverable amounts used to assess goodwill were determined using fair value less costs to sell. Fair value less costs to sell was estimated for the cash-generating units using the after-tax future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves based on forecast prices and costs, discounted at 10 percent. The future net cash flows were based primarily on information contained within reserve reports provided by Encanas IQREs. Forecast prices used to determine fair value in the assessment of goodwill were consistent with the forecast prices used to determine the fair value of Encanas upstream assets as disclosed in Note 12. The discount rate of 10 percent is reassessed at each year end and has remained consistent for goodwill impairment assessments completed as at December 31, 2011 and 2010. As at December 31, 2011, it was determined that the discount rate for the Canadian Division and the USA Division would have to increase to 13 percent and 13 percent, respectively, to result in a goodwill impairment.
As at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the recoverable amounts exceeded the aggregated carrying values of the cash-generating units. Accordingly, no impairments were recognized.
15. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade Payables |
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
Accruals |
|
1,607 |
|
|
1,678 |
| ||
Interest Payable |
|
124 |
|
|
133 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
Payables and accruals are non-interest bearing. Accruals include capital, production, royalty, mineral tax, market optimization and long-term incentive accruals. Interest payable represents amounts accrued related to Encanas unsecured notes as disclosed in Note 17.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
16. Other Liabilities and Provisions |
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Asset under Construction The Bow office project (See Note 12) |
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
Asset under Construction Production Field Centre (PFC) (See Note 12) |
|
607 |
|
|
528 |
| ||
Pensions and Other Post-employment Benefits (See Note 21) |
|
109 |
|
|
108 |
| ||
Other |
|
23 |
|
|
32 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,758 |
|
As described in Note 12, Encana has recognized The Bow office project as an asset under construction. The construction costs have been recognized as an asset with a corresponding liability. During 2012, Encana will assume occupancy of The Bow office premises, at which time the Company will commence payments to the third-party developer. Over the 25 year term of the agreement, Encana will depreciate The Bow asset and reduce the accrued liability. At the conclusion of the 25 year term, the remaining asset and corresponding liability will be derecognized. The total undiscounted future payments related to The Bow office commitment are below. In conjunction with the Split Transaction as described in Note 20, Encana has subleased part of The Bow office space to Cenovus. Expected sublease recoveries from Cenovus are disclosed below.
(undiscounted) |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Expected future payments |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
91 |
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
$ |
2,516 |
|
Sublease recoveries |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
(45 |
) |
$ |
(45 |
) |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
(1,045 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,252) |
|
As described in Note 12, during the construction phase of the PFC, Encana has recognized an asset under construction with a corresponding liability as disclosed above. Upon commencement of operations in 2012, Encana will recognize the PFC as a finance lease. Encanas total discounted future payments related to the PFC total $497 million. The total undiscounted future payments related to the PFC are below.
(undiscounted) |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Expected future payments |
|
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
711 |
|
17. Current and Long-Term Debt |
CURRENT DEBT
As at December 31 |
|
Note |
|
C$ |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Canadian Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Revolving credit and term loan borrowings |
|
A |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
E |
|
500 |
|
|
492 |
|
|
- |
| |||
|
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
492 |
|
|
- |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
U.S. Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Revolving credit and term loan borrowings |
|
A |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| |||
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
E |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
500 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
LONG-TERM DEBT
As at December 31 |
|
Note |
|
C$ |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Canadian Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
4.30% due March 12, 2012 |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
5.80% due January 18, 2018 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
737 |
|
|
754 |
| |||
Canadian Unsecured Notes |
|
B |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
1,257 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
U.S. Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
6.30% due November 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
500 |
| |||
4.75% due October 15, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
500 |
| |||
5.80% due May 1, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,000 |
| |||
5.90% due December 1, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
700 |
| |||
6.50% due May 15, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
500 |
| |||
3.90% due November 15, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
- |
| |||
8.125% due September 15, 2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
300 |
| |||
7.20% due November 1, 2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
350 |
| |||
7.375% due November 1, 2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
500 |
| |||
6.50% due August 15, 2034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
750 |
| |||
6.625% due August 15, 2037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
500 |
| |||
6.50% due February 1, 2038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
800 |
| |||
5.15% due November 15, 2041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
- |
| |||
U.S. Unsecured Notes |
|
B |
|
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
6,400 |
| |||
Total Principal |
|
F |
|
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
|
7,657 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Increase in Value of Debt Acquired |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
50 |
| |||
Debt Discounts and Transaction Costs |
|
D |
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
(78 |
) | |||
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
E |
|
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
(500 |
) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,591 |
|
|
$ |
7,129 |
|
A) REVOLVING CREDIT AND TERM LOAN BORROWINGS
During 2011, the Company issued commercial paper and borrowed on its revolving credit facilities. There are no outstanding balances at December 31, 2011. Standby fees paid in 2011 relating to Canadian and U.S. revolving credit and term loan agreements were approximately $5 million (2010 $5 million).
Canadian Revolving Credit and Term Loan Borrowings
At December 31, 2011, Encana had in place a committed revolving bank credit facility for C$4.0 billion or its equivalent amount in U.S. dollars ($3.9 billion). The facility, which matures in October 2015, is fully revolving up to maturity. The facility is extendible from time to time, but not more than once per year, for a period not longer than five years plus 90 days from the date of the extension request, at the option of the lenders and upon notice from Encana. The facility is unsecured and bears interest at the lenders rates for Canadian prime, U.S. base rate or Bankers Acceptances plus applicable margins, or at LIBOR plus applicable margins. At December 31, 2011, $3.9 billion of the revolving bank credit facility remains unused.
U.S. Revolving Credit and Term Loan Borrowings
At December 31, 2011, one of Encanas subsidiaries had in place a committed revolving bank credit facility for $1.0 billion. The facility, which matures in October 2015, is guaranteed by Encana Corporation and is fully revolving up to maturity. The facility is extendible from time to time, but not more than once per year, for a period not longer than five years plus 90 days from the date of the extension request, at the option of the lenders and upon notice from the subsidiary. This facility bears interest at either the lenders U.S. base rate or at LIBOR plus applicable margins. At December 31, 2011, $999 million of the revolving bank credit facility remains unused.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
B) UNSECURED NOTES
Unsecured notes include medium-term notes and senior notes that are issued from time to time under trust indentures.
Canadian Unsecured Notes
Encana has in place a debt shelf prospectus for Canadian unsecured medium-term notes in the amount of C$2.0 billion ($2.0 billion). The shelf prospectus provides that debt securities in Canadian dollars or other foreign currencies may be issued from time to time in one or more series. Terms of the notes, including interest at either fixed or floating rates and maturity dates, are determined by reference to market conditions at the date of issue. The shelf prospectus was filed in May 2011 and expires in June 2013. At December 31, 2011, C$2.0 billion ($2.0 billion) of the shelf prospectus remained unutilized, the availability of which is dependent upon market conditions.
U.S. Unsecured Notes
Encana has in place a debt shelf prospectus for U.S. unsecured notes in the amount of $4.0 billion under the multijurisdictional disclosure system. The shelf prospectus provides that debt securities in U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies may be issued from time to time in one or more series. Terms of the notes, including interest at either fixed or floating rates and maturity dates, are determined by reference to market conditions at the date of issue. The shelf prospectus was filed in April 2010 and expires in May 2012.
On November 14, 2011, Encana completed a public offering in the U.S. of senior unsecured notes of $600 million with a coupon rate of 3.90 percent due November 15, 2021 and $400 million with a coupon rate of 5.15 percent due November 15, 2041. The net proceeds of the offering totaling $989 million were used to repay a portion of Encanas commercial paper indebtedness, a portion of which was incurred to repay Encanas $500 million 6.30 percent notes that matured November 1, 2011.
At December 31, 2011, $3.0 billion of the shelf prospectus remained unutilized, the availability of which is dependent upon market conditions.
The 5.80 percent notes due May 1, 2014 were issued by the Companys indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Encana Holdings Finance Corp. This note is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Encana Corporation.
C) INCREASE IN VALUE OF DEBT ACQUIRED
Certain of the notes and debentures of the Company were acquired in business combinations and were accounted for at their fair value at the dates of acquisition. The difference between the fair value and the principal amount of the debt is being amortized over the remaining life of the outstanding debt acquired, approximately 19 years.
D) DEBT DISCOUNTS AND TRANSACTION COSTS
Long-term debt transaction costs, premiums and discounts are capitalized within long-term debt and are being amortized using the effective interest method. During 2011, $23 million (2010 nil) in transaction costs and discounts have been capitalized related to the issuance of U.S. unsecured notes and the renewal of the credit facilities.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
E) CURRENT PORTION OF LONG-TERM DEBT
As at December 31 |
|
C$ Principal |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
6.30% due November 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
4.30% due March 12, 2012 |
|
500 |
|
|
492 |
|
|
- |
| |||
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
F) MANDATORY DEBT PAYMENTS
As at December 31 |
|
C$ Principal |
|
|
US$ Principal |
|
|
Total US$ |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
2012 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
2013 |
|
- |
|
|
500 |
|
|
500 |
| |||
2014 |
|
- |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,000 |
| |||
2015 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| |||
2016 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| |||
Thereafter |
|
750 |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
6,137 |
| |||
Total |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
$ |
8,129 |
|
18. Asset Retirement Obligation |
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Asset Retirement Obligation, Beginning of Year |
|
|
$ |
953 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
Liabilities Incurred |
|
|
43 |
|
|
104 |
| ||
Liabilities Settled |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
(26 |
) | ||
Liabilities Divested |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
(79 |
) | ||
Reclassification to Liabilities Associated with Assets Held for Sale (See Note 10) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
- |
| ||
Change in Estimated Future Cash Outflows |
|
|
153 |
|
|
55 |
| ||
Accretion Expense |
|
|
51 |
|
|
48 |
| ||
Foreign Currency Translation and Other |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
32 |
| ||
Asset Retirement Obligation, End of Year |
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
|
$ |
953 |
|
Encana is responsible for the retirement of long-lived assets related to its oil and gas assets and midstream assets at the end of their useful lives. The Company has recognized an obligation of $1,043 million based on the best estimate of the expenditures to be incurred, of which $128 million is expected to be incurred within one to three years and $915 million thereafter. Actual costs may differ from those estimated due to changes in legislation and changes in costs. The Companys December 31, 2011 obligation reflects the remeasurement of the liability and has been discounted using a weighted average credit-adjusted risk-free rate of 5.1 percent (2010 5.4 percent). The change in estimated future cash outflows includes $69 million (2010 $110 million) as a result of the change in the discount rate. The total undiscounted amount of estimated cash flows required to settle the obligation is $4,353 million (2010 $4,696 million). Most of these obligations are not expected to be paid for several years, or decades, in the future and will be funded from general Company resources at that time.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
19. Capital Structure |
The Companys capital structure consists of shareholders equity plus debt, defined as current and long-term debt. The Companys objectives when managing its capital structure are to:
i) maintain financial flexibility to preserve Encanas access to capital markets and its ability to meet its financial obligations; and
ii) finance internally generated growth, as well as potential acquisitions.
Encana has a long-standing practice of maintaining capital discipline, managing its capital structure and adjusting its capital structure according to market conditions to maintain flexibility while achieving the objectives stated above. To manage the capital structure, the Company may adjust capital spending, adjust dividends paid to shareholders, purchase shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bids, issue new shares, issue new debt or repay existing debt. The Companys capital management objectives and approach to managing its capital structure have remained unchanged.
In managing the Companys capital structure, the Company monitors several non-GAAP financial metrics as indicators of the Companys overall financial strength. Key metrics currently monitored include Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow, Debt to Adjusted EBITDA and Debt to Capitalization. Encana is subject to certain financial covenants in its credit facility agreements and is in compliance with all financial covenants.
The financial metrics monitored by Management are calculated below. As at December 31, 2011, Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow was 1.8 times (2010 1.6 times), Debt to Adjusted EBITDA was 1.9 times (2010 1.6 times) and Debt to Capitalization was 33 percent (2010 31 percent). The metrics presented may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Debt |
|
|
$ |
8,083 |
|
|
$ |
7,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
122 |
|
|
50 |
| ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
3,318 |
| ||
Impairments |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
496 |
| ||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
(141 |
) | ||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
51 |
|
|
48 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
48 |
|
|
640 |
| ||
Cash tax on sale of assets |
|
|
114 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Unrealized (gain) loss on risk management |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
(945 |
) | ||
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
96 |
|
|
(278 |
) | ||
Other |
|
|
94 |
|
|
79 |
| ||
Cash Flow |
|
|
4,175 |
|
|
4,437 |
| ||
Interest expense, after tax |
|
|
344 |
|
|
360 |
| ||
Debt Adjusted Cash Flow |
|
|
$ |
4,519 |
|
|
$ |
4,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Debt to Debt Adjusted Cash Flow |
|
|
1.8x |
|
|
1.6x |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Debt |
|
|
$ |
8,083 |
|
|
$ |
7,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Earnings |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest |
|
|
468 |
|
|
501 |
| ||
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
427 |
| ||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
142 |
|
|
65 |
| ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
3,318 |
| ||
Impairments |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
496 |
| ||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
(141 |
) | ||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
51 |
|
|
48 |
| ||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
|
170 |
|
|
(250 |
) | ||
Unrealized (gain) loss on risk management |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
(945 |
) | ||
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
|
$ |
4,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Debt to Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
1.9x |
|
|
1.6x |
|
Debt to Capitalization Ratio
As at December 31 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Debt |
|
|
$ |
8,083 |
|
|
$ |
7,629 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
16,324 |
|
|
16,833 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capitalization |
|
|
$ |
24,407 |
|
|
$ |
24,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Debt to Capitalization Ratio |
|
|
33% |
|
|
31% |
|
20. Share Capital |
AUTHORIZED
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of no par value common shares, an unlimited number of first preferred shares and an unlimited number of second preferred shares.
ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(millions) |
|
Number |
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common Shares Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
736.3 |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
751.3 |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
Common Shares Issued under Option Plans |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
5 |
| ||
Share-Based Compensation |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
2 |
| ||
Common Shares Purchased |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
(48 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common Shares Outstanding, End of Year |
|
736.3 |
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
|
736.3 |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
NORMAL COURSE ISSUER BID
In 2011 and 2010, Encana had approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange to purchase common shares under a Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB). Encana was entitled to purchase, for cancellation, up to 36.8 million common shares under the most recent NCIB, which commenced on December 14, 2010 and expired on December 13, 2011. The Company has not renewed its NCIB and did not purchase any common shares during 2011.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
During 2010, the Company purchased approximately 15.4 million common shares for total consideration of approximately $499 million. Of the amount paid, $6 million was charged to paid in surplus, $48 million was charged to share capital and $445 million was charged to retained earnings.
DIVIDENDS
For the year ended December 31, 2011, Encana declared and paid dividends of $0.80 (2010 $0.80) per common share totaling $588 million (2010 $590 million). On February 16, 2012, the Board declared a dividend of $0.20 per common share payable on March 30, 2012.
ENCANA STOCK OPTION PLAN
Encana has stock-based compensation plans that allow employees to purchase common shares of the Company. Option exercise prices are not less than the market value of the common shares on the date the options were granted. Options granted are exercisable at 30 percent of the number granted after one year, an additional 30 percent of the number granted after two years, are fully exercisable after three years and expire five years after the date granted.
All options outstanding as at December 31, 2011 have associated TSARs attached. In lieu of exercising the option, the associated TSARs give the option holder the right to receive a cash payment equal to the excess of the market price of Encanas common shares at the time of the exercise over the original grant price. In addition, certain stock options granted are performance-based. The Performance TSARs vest and expire under the same terms and conditions as the underlying option. Vesting is also subject to Encana attaining prescribed performance relative to predetermined key measures. See Note 21 for further information on Encanas outstanding and exercisable TSARs and Performance TSARs.
At December 31, 2011, there were 10.9 million common shares reserved for issuance under stock option plans (2010 11.8 million).
ENCANA RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS
Encana has a stock-based compensation plan whereby eligible employees are granted RSUs. An RSU is a conditional grant to receive an Encana common share, or the cash equivalent, as determined by Encana, and in accordance with the terms of the RSU Plan and Grant Agreement. The value of one RSU is notionally equivalent to one Encana common share. RSUs vest three years from the date of grant, provided the employee remains actively employed with Encana on the vesting date. See Note 21 for further information on Encanas outstanding RSUs.
ENCANA SHARE UNITS HELD BY CENOVUS EMPLOYEES
On November 30, 2009, Encana completed a corporate reorganization to split into two independent publicly traded energy companies Encana Corporation and Cenovus Energy Inc. (the Split Transaction). In conjunction with the Split Transaction, each holder of Encana share units disposed of their right in exchange for the grant of new Encana share units and Cenovus share units. Share units include TSARs, Performance TSARs, Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) and Performance SARs. The terms and conditions of the share units are similar to the terms and conditions of the original share units.
With respect to the Encana share units held by Cenovus employees and the Cenovus share units held by Encana employees, both Encana and Cenovus have agreed to reimburse each other for share units exercised for cash by their respective employees. Accordingly, for Encana share units held by Cenovus employees, Encana has recorded a payable to Cenovus employees and a receivable due from Cenovus. The payable to Cenovus employees and the receivable due from Cenovus is based on the fair value of the Encana share units determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton model (See Notes 21 and 22). There is no impact on Encanas net earnings for the share units held by Cenovus employees.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
TSARs and Performance TSARs held by Cenovus employees will expire by December 2014. No further Encana share units will be granted to Cenovus employees.
Cenovus employees may exercise Encana TSARs and Encana Performance TSARs in exchange for Encana common shares. The following table summarizes the Encana TSARs and Performance TSARs held by Cenovus employees as at December 31, 2011:
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encana TSARs held by Cenovus employees |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
4.3 |
|
32.39 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
3.6 |
|
33.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encana Performance TSARs held by Cenovus employees |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
6.1 |
|
31.68 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
4.9 |
|
32.37 |
|
PER SHARE AMOUNTS
The following table summarizes the common shares used in calculating net earnings per common share:
For the years ended December 31 (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
736.3 |
|
|
739.7 |
|
Diluted |
|
737.9 |
|
|
741.7 |
|
Outstanding TSARs, Performance TSARs and RSUs can be exchanged for common shares of Encana in accordance with the terms of the plans. As a result, they are considered potentially dilutive and are included in the calculation of Encanas diluted net earnings per share calculation when they are dilutive for the period.
For purposes of calculating the diluted net earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2011, the cash-settled calculation was determined to be the most dilutive and no adjustment was made to net earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the equity-settled calculation was determined to be the most dilutive. Under the equity-settled method, the calculation adjusts the reported net earnings for applicable cash-settled share units as if they were accounted for as equity instruments. Accordingly, net earnings were reduced by $17 million for the purposes of calculating diluted net earnings per common share.
PAID IN SURPLUS
As at December 31, 2011, the paid in surplus balance of $4 million relates to RSUs (See Note 21).
21. Compensation Plans |
Encana has a number of compensation arrangements that form the Companys long-term incentive plan awarded to eligible employees. They include TSARs, Performance TSARs, SARs, Performance SARs, Performance Share Units (PSUs), Deferred Share Units (DSUs), RSUs and a Restricted Cash Plan. The majority of these compensation arrangements are share-based.
Encana accounts for TSARs, Performance TSARs, SARs, Performance SARs and RSUs held by Encana employees as cash-settled share-based payment transactions and accordingly, accrues compensation costs over the vesting period based on the fair value of the rights determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton model.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
TSARs, Performance TSARs, SARs and Performance SARs granted are exercisable at 30 percent of the number granted after one year, an additional 30 percent of the number granted after two years, are fully exercisable after three years and expire five years after the date granted. RSUs vest three years from the date of grant, provided the employee remains actively employed with Encana on the vesting date.
As at December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Encana share units held by Encana employees was estimated using the following weighted average assumptions: risk free rate of 0.97 percent, dividend yield of 4.19 percent, volatility of 31.59 percent, expected term of 2.0 years and an Encana market share price of C$18.89. As at December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Cenovus share units held by Encana employees was estimated using the following weighted average assumptions: risk free rate of 0.97 percent, dividend yield of 2.36 percent, volatility of 32.48 percent, expected term of 0.9 years and a Cenovus market share price of C$33.83. For both Encana and Cenovus share units held by Encana employees, volatility was estimated using historical and implied volatility rates.
The amounts recognized for share-based payment transactions are as follows:
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation Costs recorded for Cash-Settled Transactions |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
Compensation Costs recorded for Equity-Settled Transactions |
|
- |
|
|
2 |
| ||
Total Compensation Costs |
|
28 |
|
|
38 |
| ||
Less: Total Compensation Costs Capitalized |
|
(14 |
) |
|
(11 |
) | ||
Total Compensation Expense |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liability for Cash-Settled Share-Based Payment Transactions |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
Liability for Vested Cash-Settled Share-Based Payment Transactions |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
Of the total compensation expense, $8 million (2010 $12 million) was included in operating costs and $6 million (2010 $15 million) was included in administrative expenses.
The following sections outline certain information related to Encanas compensation plans as at December 31, 2011.
A) TANDEM STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
All options to purchase common shares issued under the Encana Stock Option Plan have associated TSARs attached. In lieu of exercising the option, the associated TSARs give the option holder the right to receive a cash payment equal to the excess of the market price of Encanas common shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price. The TSARs vest and expire under the same terms and conditions as the underlying option.
The following table summarizes information related to the Encana TSARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
14,240,267 |
|
30.89 |
|
|
12,473,214 |
|
28.85 |
|
Granted |
|
9,628,250 |
|
25.13 |
|
|
4,796,595 |
|
32.59 |
|
Exercised SARs |
|
(3,327,083 |
) |
26.08 |
|
|
(2,499,993 |
) |
23.97 |
|
Exercised Options |
|
(39,020 |
) |
25.45 |
|
|
(97,136 |
) |
20.90 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(1,111,989 |
) |
32.29 |
|
|
(432,413 |
) |
32.87 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
19,390,425 |
|
28.79 |
|
|
14,240,267 |
|
30.89 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
6,258,506 |
|
32.64 |
|
|
7,301,991 |
|
29.47 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Encana TSARs |
|
Exercisable Encana TSARs |
| ||||||
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 to 19.99 |
|
28,375 |
|
4.90 |
|
19.35 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
9,398,830 |
|
3.51 |
|
24.31 |
|
2,642,733 |
|
29.25 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
9,847,670 |
|
3.00 |
|
32.90 |
|
3,500,223 |
|
34.79 |
|
40.00 to 49.99 |
|
114,050 |
|
1.41 |
|
45.01 |
|
114,050 |
|
45.01 |
|
50.00 to 59.99 |
|
1,500 |
|
1.39 |
|
50.39 |
|
1,500 |
|
50.39 |
|
|
|
19,390,425 |
|
3.24 |
|
28.79 |
|
6,258,506 |
|
32.64 |
|
The following tables summarize information related to the Cenovus TSARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
8,213,658 |
|
27.81 |
|
|
12,482,694 |
|
26.08 |
|
Exercised SARs |
|
(4,081,292 |
) |
26.17 |
|
|
(3,847,458 |
) |
22.25 |
|
Exercised Options |
|
(55,310 |
) |
23.10 |
|
|
(105,469 |
) |
19.37 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(142,049 |
) |
30.01 |
|
|
(316,109 |
) |
29.86 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
3,935,007 |
|
29.49 |
|
|
8,213,658 |
|
27.81 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
3,203,340 |
|
30.22 |
|
|
5,977,506 |
|
27.38 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Cenovus TSARs |
|
Exercisable Cenovus TSARs |
| ||||||
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
2,196,637 |
|
1.52 |
|
26.47 |
|
1,465,170 |
|
26.55 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
1,671,220 |
|
1.09 |
|
32.93 |
|
1,671,020 |
|
32.93 |
|
40.00 to 49.99 |
|
67,150 |
|
1.44 |
|
42.88 |
|
67,150 |
|
42.88 |
|
|
|
3,935,007 |
|
1.34 |
|
29.49 |
|
3,203,340 |
|
30.22 |
|
During the year, Encana recorded a reduction in compensation costs of $4 million related to the Encana TSARs and compensation costs of $6 million related to the Cenovus TSARs (2010 reduction of compensation costs of $29 million related to the Encana TSARs and compensation costs of $32 million related to the Cenovus TSARs).
B) PERFORMANCE TANDEM SHARE APPRECIATION RIGHTS
From 2007 to 2009, Encana granted Performance TSARs. In lieu of exercising the option, the option holder has the right to receive a cash payment equal to the excess of the market price of Encanas common shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price. The Performance TSARs vest and expire under the same terms and conditions as the underlying option. Vesting is also subject to Encana attaining prescribed performance relative to an internal recycle ratio and predetermined key measures. Performance TSARs that do not vest when eligible are forfeited.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The following tables summarize information related to the Encana Performance TSARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
9,107,569 |
|
31.46 |
|
|
10,461,901 |
|
31.42 |
|
Exercised SARs |
|
(504,902 |
) |
29.32 |
|
|
(251,443 |
) |
29.36 |
|
Exercised Options |
|
(148 |
) |
29.04 |
|
|
(171 |
) |
29.04 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(723,389 |
) |
32.48 |
|
|
(1,102,718 |
) |
31.51 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
7,879,130 |
|
31.50 |
|
|
9,107,569 |
|
31.46 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
6,449,374 |
|
32.05 |
|
|
4,994,939 |
|
31.42 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Encana |
|
Exercisable Encana |
| ||||||
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
5,379,019 |
|
1.29 |
|
29.21 |
|
3,949,263 |
|
29.27 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
2,500,111 |
|
1.12 |
|
36.44 |
|
2,500,111 |
|
36.44 |
|
|
|
7,879,130 |
|
1.24 |
|
31.50 |
|
6,449,374 |
|
32.05 |
|
The following tables summarize information related to the Cenovus Performance TSARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
8,940,486 |
|
28.49 |
|
|
10,462,643 |
|
28.42 |
|
Exercised SARs |
|
(2,757,597 |
) |
28.22 |
|
|
(410,520 |
) |
26.54 |
|
Exercised Options |
|
(3,152 |
) |
26.62 |
|
|
(991 |
) |
26.46 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(428,379 |
) |
28.85 |
|
|
(1,110,646 |
) |
28.49 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
5,751,358 |
|
28.60 |
|
|
8,940,486 |
|
28.49 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
4,318,686 |
|
29.37 |
|
|
4,827,858 |
|
28.49 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Cenovus |
|
Exercisable Cenovus |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of TSARs |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
Number of TSARs |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
3,807,547 |
|
1.56 |
|
26.37 |
|
2,374,875 |
|
26.43 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
1,943,811 |
|
1.12 |
|
32.96 |
|
1,943,811 |
|
32.96 |
|
|
|
5,751,358 |
|
1.41 |
|
28.60 |
|
4,318,686 |
|
29.37 |
|
During the year, Encana recorded a reduction in compensation costs of $12 million related to the Encana Performance TSARs and compensation costs of $14 million related to the Cenovus Performance TSARs (2010 reduction of compensation costs of $18 million related to the Encana Performance TSARs and compensation costs of $24 million related to the Cenovus Performance TSARs).
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
C) STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
During 2008 and 2009, Canadian dollar denominated SARs were granted to employees, which entitle the employee to receive a cash payment equal to the excess of the market price of Encanas common shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price of the right.
The following tables summarize information related to the Encana SARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
2,186,616 |
|
33.86 |
|
|
2,343,485 |
|
33.75 |
|
Exercised |
|
(54,800 |
) |
28.58 |
|
|
(35,535 |
) |
28.98 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(159,165 |
) |
36.19 |
|
|
(121,334 |
) |
33.23 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
1,972,651 |
|
33.81 |
|
|
2,186,616 |
|
33.86 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
1,580,915 |
|
34.97 |
|
|
993,370 |
|
35.39 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Encana SARs |
|
Exercisable Encana SARs |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
915,491 |
|
2.12 |
|
28.98 |
|
536,183 |
|
28.94 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
900,260 |
|
1.28 |
|
36.45 |
|
887,832 |
|
36.52 |
|
40.00 to 49.99 |
|
151,900 |
|
1.44 |
|
46.75 |
|
151,900 |
|
46.75 |
|
50.00 to 59.99 |
|
5,000 |
|
1.46 |
|
50.09 |
|
5,000 |
|
50.09 |
|
|
|
1,972,651 |
|
1.68 |
|
33.81 |
|
1,580,915 |
|
34.97 |
|
Since 2010, U.S. dollar denominated SARs were granted to eligible employees. The terms and conditions are similar to the Canadian dollar denominated SARs. The following tables summarize information related to U.S. dollar denominated Encana SARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar Denominated (US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
4,718,590 |
|
30.73 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Granted |
|
8,550,320 |
|
24.91 |
|
|
4,864,490 |
|
30.73 |
|
Exercised |
|
(120,571 |
) |
30.74 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Forfeited |
|
(502,870 |
) |
31.19 |
|
|
(145,900 |
) |
30.71 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
12,645,469 |
|
26.78 |
|
|
4,718,590 |
|
30.73 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
1,246,480 |
|
30.68 |
|
|
5,050 |
|
30.68 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Encana SARs |
|
Exercisable Encana SARs |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Price (US$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of SARs |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 to 19.99 |
|
11,375 |
|
4.79 |
|
18.89 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
5,903,670 |
|
4.72 |
|
21.75 |
|
132,139 |
|
27.97 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
6,730,424 |
|
3.58 |
|
31.20 |
|
1,114,341 |
|
31.00 |
|
|
|
12,645,469 |
|
4.11 |
|
26.78 |
|
1,246,480 |
|
30.68 |
|
The following tables summarize information related to the Cenovus SARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
2,158,511 |
|
30.67 |
|
|
2,323,960 |
|
30.55 |
|
Exercised |
|
(433,750 |
) |
30.02 |
|
|
(44,327 |
) |
26.15 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(84,186 |
) |
32.80 |
|
|
(121,122 |
) |
30.11 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
1,640,575 |
|
30.73 |
|
|
2,158,511 |
|
30.67 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
1,256,180 |
|
32.08 |
|
|
979,635 |
|
32.08 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Cenovus SARs |
|
Exercisable Cenovus SARs |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted Contractual |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
806,325 |
|
2.12 |
|
26.33 |
|
422,690 |
|
26.34 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
710,300 |
|
1.24 |
|
33.50 |
|
709,540 |
|
33.50 |
|
40.00 to 49.99 |
|
123,950 |
|
1.44 |
|
43.49 |
|
123,950 |
|
43.49 |
|
|
|
1,640,575 |
|
1.69 |
|
30.73 |
|
1,256,180 |
|
32.08 |
|
During the year, Encana recorded a reduction in compensation costs of $5 million related to the Encana SARs and compensation costs of $3 million related to the Cenovus SARs (2010 compensation costs of $6 million related to the Encana SARs and compensation costs of $5 million related to the Cenovus SARs).
D) PERFORMANCE STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
During 2008 and 2009, Encana granted Performance SARs to certain employees which entitle the employee to receive a cash payment equal to the excess of the market price of Encanas common shares at the time of exercise over the grant price. Performance SARs are subject to Encana attaining prescribed performance relative to an internal recycle ratio and predetermined key measures. Performance SARs that do not vest when eligible are forfeited.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The following tables summarize information related to the Encana Performance SARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
3,017,862 |
|
32.01 |
|
|
3,471,998 |
|
32.00 |
|
Exercised |
|
(81,427 |
) |
29.04 |
|
|
(52,173 |
) |
29.04 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(226,378 |
) |
32.35 |
|
|
(401,963 |
) |
32.26 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
2,710,057 |
|
32.07 |
|
|
3,017,862 |
|
32.01 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
1,964,907 |
|
33.22 |
|
|
1,060,938 |
|
33.41 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Encana |
|
Exercisable Encana |
| ||||||
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted Remaining Contractual |
|
Weighted Price |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
1,599,538 |
|
2.12 |
|
29.04 |
|
854,388 |
|
29.04 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
1,110,519 |
|
1.12 |
|
36.44 |
|
1,110,519 |
|
36.44 |
|
|
|
2,710,057 |
|
1.71 |
|
32.07 |
|
1,964,907 |
|
33.22 |
|
The following tables summarize information related to the Cenovus Performance SARs held by Encana employees:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted Exercise |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated (C$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
3,005,998 |
|
28.96 |
|
|
3,471,998 |
|
28.94 |
|
Exercised |
|
(550,313 |
) |
29.33 |
|
|
(64,173 |
) |
26.27 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(173,624 |
) |
28.87 |
|
|
(401,827 |
) |
29.20 |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
2,282,061 |
|
28.88 |
|
|
3,005,998 |
|
28.96 |
|
Exercisable, End of Year |
|
1,536,911 |
|
30.15 |
|
|
1,050,358 |
|
30.26 |
|
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
Outstanding Cenovus |
|
Exercisable Cenovus |
| ||||||
Range of Exercise Price (C$) |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
|
1,390,805 |
|
2.12 |
|
26.27 |
|
645,655 |
|
26.27 |
|
30.00 to 39.99 |
|
891,256 |
|
1.12 |
|
32.96 |
|
891,256 |
|
32.96 |
|
|
|
2,282,061 |
|
1.73 |
|
28.88 |
|
1,536,911 |
|
30.15 |
|
During the year, Encana recorded a reduction in compensation costs of $4 million related to the Encana Performance SARs and compensation costs of $5 million related to the Cenovus Performance SARs (2010 reduction of compensation costs of $4 million related to the Encana Performance SARs and compensation costs of $7 million related to the Cenovus Performance SARs).
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
E) PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS (PSUs)
Since 2010, PSUs were granted to eligible employees which entitle the employee to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to the value of one common share of Encana for each PSU held, depending upon the terms of the PSU plan. PSUs vest three years from the date of grant, provided the employee remains actively employed with Encana on the vesting date.
The ultimate value of the PSUs will depend upon Encanas performance measured over the three-year period. Each year, Encanas performance will be assessed by the Board to determine whether the performance criteria have been met. Based on this assessment, up to a maximum of two times the original PSU grant may be awarded in respect of the year being measured. The respective proportion of the original PSU grant deemed eligible to vest for each year will be valued and the notional cash value deposited to a PSU account, with payout deferred to the final vesting date.
The following table summarizes information related to the PSUs:
|
|
Outstanding PSUs |
| |||
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
875,181 |
|
|
- |
|
Granted |
|
696,845 |
|
|
880,735 |
|
Deemed Eligible to Vest |
|
(263,174 |
) |
|
- |
|
Units, in Lieu of Dividends |
|
41,600 |
|
|
23,002 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(112,061 |
) |
|
(28,556 |
) |
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
1,238,391 |
|
|
875,181 |
|
|
|
Outstanding PSUs |
| |||
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar Denominated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
795,912 |
|
|
- |
|
Granted |
|
565,225 |
|
|
810,910 |
|
Deemed Eligible to Vest |
|
(239,921 |
) |
|
- |
|
Units, in Lieu of Dividends |
|
36,399 |
|
|
21,082 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(68,948 |
) |
|
(36,080 |
) |
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
1,088,667 |
|
|
795,912 |
|
During the year, Encana recorded compensation costs of $15 million related to the outstanding PSUs (2010 compensation costs of $15 million).
F) DEFERRED SHARE UNITS (DSUs)
The Company has in place a program whereby Directors and certain key employees are issued DSUs, which vest immediately, are equivalent in value to a common share of the Company and are settled in cash. DSUs can be redeemed in accordance with the terms of the agreement and expire on December 15th of the year following the Directors resignation or employees departure.
Employees have the option to convert either 25 or 50 percent of their annual High Performance Results (HPR) award into DSUs. The number of DSUs is based on the value of the award divided by the closing value of Encanas share price at the end of the performance period of the HPR award.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The following table summarizes information related to the DSUs:
|
|
Outstanding DSUs |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
716,893 |
|
|
672,147 |
|
Granted |
|
107,967 |
|
|
104,477 |
|
Converted from HPR awards |
|
51,620 |
|
|
21,732 |
|
Units, in Lieu of Dividends |
|
29,304 |
|
|
20,338 |
|
Redeemed |
|
(931 |
) |
|
(101,801 |
) |
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
904,853 |
|
|
716,893 |
|
During the year, Encana recorded a reduction in compensation costs of $5 million related to the outstanding DSUs (2010 compensation costs of nil).
G) RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS
In 2011, RSUs were granted to eligible employees. An RSU is a conditional grant to receive an Encana common share, or the cash equivalent, as determined by Encana, and in accordance with the terms of the RSU Plan and Grant Agreement. The value of one RSU is notionally equivalent to one Encana common share. RSUs vest three years from the date of grant, provided the employee remains actively employed with Encana on the vesting date. As at December 31, 2011, Encana plans to settle the RSUs in cash on the vesting date.
The following table summarizes information related to the RSUs:
|
|
Outstanding RSUs |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Denominated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Granted |
|
1,790,135 |
|
|
- |
|
Units, in Lieu of Dividends |
|
35,362 |
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited |
|
(74,330 |
) |
|
- |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
1,751,167 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Outstanding RSUs |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar Denominated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Beginning of Year |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Granted |
|
1,580,575 |
|
|
- |
|
Units, in Lieu of Dividends |
|
30,452 |
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited |
|
(37,456 |
) |
|
- |
|
Outstanding, End of Year |
|
1,573,571 |
|
|
- |
|
During the year, Encana recorded compensation costs of $15 million related to the outstanding RSUs (2010 compensation costs of nil), of which $4 million has been recorded as paid in surplus.
H) RESTRICTED CASH PLAN
In October 2011, Encanas Board approved the use of a Restricted Cash Plan as a component of the long-term incentive grant to eligible employees. The Restricted Cash Plan is a time-based conditional grant to receive cash which, in accordance with the corresponding grant agreement, requires that the employee remains actively employed with Encana on the vesting date. The Restricted Cash Plan vests over three years with one-third payable after each anniversary of the grant date. Since October 2011, Encana recorded compensation costs of $6 million relating to the Restricted Cash Plan grant.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
I) PENSIONS AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
The Company sponsors defined benefit and defined contribution plans, providing pension and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) to its employees in Canada and the U.S. As of January 1, 2003, the defined benefit pension plan was closed to new entrants. The average remaining service period of active employees participating in the defined benefit pension plan is six years. The average remaining service period of the active employees participating in the OPEB plan is 10 years.
The Company is required to file an actuarial valuation of its pension plans with the provincial regulator at least every three years. The most recent filing was dated December 31, 2010 and the next required filing will be as at December 31, 2013.
As at December 31, 2011, the Companys pension benefit obligation was $344 million (2010 $313 million) and OPEB obligation was $95 million (2010 $82 million). The 2011 pension benefit obligation was determined using the weighted average discount rate of 4.0 percent (2010 5.0 percent) and a weighted average rate of compensation increase of 4.11 percent (2010 4.15 percent). The 2011 OPEB obligation was determined using the weighted average discount rate of 4.27 percent (2010 5.10 percent) and a weighted average rate of compensation increase of 6.33 percent (2010 6.33 percent). The Companys expected rate of health care inflation is 9.56 percent (2010 8.90 percent). The change in the accrued benefit obligation is below.
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accrued Benefit Obligation, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Current service costs |
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
10 |
| ||||
Interest cost |
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
| ||||
Actuarial (gains) losses |
|
39 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
8 |
| ||||
Exchange differences |
|
(8 |
) |
|
15 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
| ||||
Benefits paid |
|
(20 |
) |
|
(22 |
) |
|
(2 |
) |
|
(2 |
) | ||||
Change in plan provisions |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(1 |
) | ||||
Accrued Benefit Obligation, End of Year |
|
$ |
344 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
The change in fair value of plan assets is as follows: |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Fair Value of Plan Assets, Beginning of Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
| ||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
17 |
| ||||
Actuarial gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
6 |
| ||||
Exchange differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
14 |
| ||||
Employer contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
10 |
| ||||
Benefits paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
(22 |
) | ||||
Fair Value of Plan Assets, End of Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
| ||||||||||
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Fair Value of Plan Assets, End of Year |
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Accrued Benefit Obligation, End of Year |
|
344 |
|
|
313 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
82 |
| ||||
Funded Status Plan Assets (less) than Benefit Obligation |
|
(69 |
) |
|
(37 |
) |
|
(95 |
) |
|
(82 |
) | ||||
Amounts Not Recognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Unamortized net actuarial (gain) loss |
|
58 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
8 |
| ||||
Unamortized past service costs |
|
- |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(1 |
) | ||||
Accrued Benefit Asset (Liability) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
Experience adjustments gain (loss) on plan assets |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Experience adjustments (gain) loss on plan liabilities |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The periodic pension and OPEB expense is as follows:
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
| ||||||||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current service costs |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
Interest cost |
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(15 |
) |
|
(15 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||
Actuarial gains and losses |
|
- |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||
Total Benefit Plans Expense |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
OPEB |
| ||||||||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Defined Benefit Plan Expense |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Defined Contribution Plan Expense |
|
44 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| ||||
Total Benefit Plans Expense |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Of the total benefit plans expense, $52 million (2010 $42 million) was included in operating costs and $12 million (2010 $9 million) was included in administrative expenses.
The Companys pension plan assets were invested in the following as at December 31, 2011: 36 percent Domestic Equity (2010 41 percent), 25 percent Foreign Equity (2010 23 percent), 33 percent Bonds (2010 29 percent), and 6 percent Real Estate and Other (2010 7 percent). The expected long-term rate of return is 6.75 percent. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for each asset class in the plan investment portfolio. The actual return on plan assets was $5.5 million (2010 $20.7 million). The asset allocation structure is subject to diversification requirements and constraints, which reduce risk by limiting exposure to individual equity investment, credit rating categories and foreign currency exposure.
The Companys contribution to the defined benefit pension plan is subject to the results of the actuarial valuation and direction by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board. Contributions by the participants to the defined contribution pension and other benefits plans were $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2010 $0.3 million). Encanas contribution to the defined benefit pension plan for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $19 million (2010 $10 million). The Company expects to contribute $23 million to its pension plans in 2012. The Companys OPEB plans are funded on an as required basis.
Total compensation provided to employees in exchange for employment services includes the long-term incentive plans, pension and other post-employment benefits described above, as well as salaries, bonuses and short-term benefits. Encanas compensation expense totaled $514 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2010 $461 million).
22. |
Financial Instruments and Risk Management |
Encanas financial assets and liabilities are recognized in cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued revenues, investments and other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, risk management assets and liabilities, and current and long-term debt. Risk management assets and liabilities arise from the use of derivative financial instruments. Fair values of financial assets and liabilities, summarized information related to risk management positions, and discussion of risks associated with financial assets and liabilities are presented as follows:
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
A) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued revenues, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amount due to the short-term maturity of those instruments except for the amounts associated with share units issued as part of the Split Transaction, as discussed in Notes 20 and 21.
Risk management assets and liabilities are recorded at their estimated fair value using quoted market prices which are either directly or indirectly observable at the reporting date.
The fair value of investments and other assets approximates their carrying amount due to the nature of the instruments held.
Current and long-term debt are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method of amortization. The estimated fair value of current and long-term borrowings has been determined based on market information where available, or by discounting future payments of interest and principal at estimated interest rates expected to be available to the Company at period end.
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities were as follows:
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Held for Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable and accrued revenues (1) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
Risk management assets (2) |
|
2,047 |
|
2,047 |
|
|
1,234 |
|
1,234 |
| ||||
Loans and Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
732 |
|
732 |
|
|
629 |
|
629 |
| ||||
Accounts receivable and accrued revenues |
|
971 |
|
971 |
|
|
953 |
|
953 |
| ||||
Investments and other assets |
|
469 |
|
469 |
|
|
86 |
|
86 |
| ||||
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Held for Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (3), (4) |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
$ |
147 |
|
Risk management liabilities (2) |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
|
73 |
|
73 |
| ||||
Financial Liabilities Measured at Amortized Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
2,226 |
|
2,226 |
|
|
2,122 |
|
2,122 |
| ||||
Current and long-term debt |
|
8,083 |
|
9,215 |
|
|
7,629 |
|
8,488 |
|
(1) Represents amounts due from Cenovus for Encana share units held by Cenovus employees (See Note 20).
(2) Including current portion.
(3) Includes amounts due to Cenovus employees for Encana share units held (See Note 20).
(4) Includes amounts due to Cenovus for Cenovus share units held by Encana employees (See Notes 20 and 21).
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
B) RISK MANAGEMENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
NET RISK MANAGEMENT POSITION
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current asset |
|
$ |
1,806 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
Long-term asset |
|
241 |
|
|
505 |
| ||
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
1,234 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liability |
|
1 |
|
|
65 |
| ||
Long-term liability |
|
6 |
|
|
8 |
| ||
|
|
7 |
|
|
73 |
| ||
Net Risk Management Asset |
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
SUMMARY OF UNREALIZED RISK MANAGEMENT POSITIONS
As at December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Risk Management |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Net |
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Net |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Commodity Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Natural Gas |
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
Power |
|
15 |
|
- |
|
15 |
|
|
- |
|
10 |
|
(10 |
) | ||||||
Total Fair Value |
|
$ |
2,047 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
NET FAIR VALUE METHODOLOGIES USED TO CALCULATE UNREALIZED RISK MANAGEMENT POSITIONS
The total net fair value of Encanas unrealized risk management positions is $2,040 million as at December 31, 2011 ($1,161 million as at December 31, 2010) and has been calculated using both quoted prices in active markets and observable market-corroborated data.
NET FAIR VALUE OF COMMODITY PRICE POSITIONS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
|
Notional Volumes |
|
Term |
|
Average Price |
|
|
Fair Value |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Natural Gas Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed Price Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NYMEX Fixed Price |
|
1,955 MMcf/d |
|
2012 |
|
5.80 US$/Mcf |
|
|
$ |
1,828 |
|
NYMEX Fixed Price |
|
505 MMcf/d |
|
2013 |
|
5.24 US$/Mcf |
|
|
237 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basis Contracts (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canada |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) | |
United States |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) | |
Canada and United States |
|
|
|
2013-2015 |
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,023 |
| |
Other Financial Positions (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| |
Natural Gas Fair Value Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,025 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Power Purchase Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Power Fair Value Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
| |
Total Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
(1) Encana has entered into swaps to protect against widening natural gas price differentials between production areas including Canada, the U.S. Rockies and Texas, and various sales points. These basis swaps are priced using both fixed differential prices and differentials determined as a percentage of NYMEX.
(2) Other financial positions are part of the ongoing operations of the Companys proprietary production management.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
EARNINGS IMPACT OF REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON RISK MANAGEMENT POSITIONS
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss) |
| |||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
$ |
955 |
|
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
Operating Expenses and Other |
|
(7 |
) |
|
(4 |
) | ||
Gain (Loss) on Risk Management |
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
$ |
1,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
| |||||
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
947 |
|
Operating Expenses and Other |
|
25 |
|
|
(2 |
) | ||
Gain (Loss) on Risk Management |
|
$ |
879 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
RECONCILIATION OF UNREALIZED RISK MANAGEMENT POSITIONS FROM JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
| ||||
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Total |
|
|
Total Unrealized |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Fair Value of Contracts, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in Fair Value of Contracts in Place at Beginning of Year and Contracts Entered into During the Year |
|
1,827 |
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
| |
Fair Value of Contracts Realized During the Year |
|
(948 |
) |
(948 |
) |
|
(1,203 |
) | |||
Fair Value of Contracts, End of Year |
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
$ |
879 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
C) RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Company is exposed to financial risks arising from its financial assets and liabilities. Financial risks include market risks (such as commodity prices, foreign exchange and interest rates), credit risk and liquidity risk. The fair value or future cash flows of financial assets or liabilities may fluctuate due to movement in market prices and the exposure to credit and liquidity risks.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
Commodity price risk arises from the effect that fluctuations of future commodity prices may have on the fair value or future cash flows of financial assets and liabilities. To partially mitigate exposure to commodity price risk, the Company has entered into various derivative financial instruments. The use of these derivative instruments is governed under formal policies and is subject to limits established by the Board. The Companys policy is to not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Natural Gas To partially mitigate the natural gas commodity price risk, the Company has entered into swaps which fix the NYMEX prices. To help protect against widening natural gas price differentials in various production areas, Encana has entered into swaps to manage the price differentials between these production areas and various sales points.
Power The Company has entered into Canadian dollar denominated derivative contracts to help manage its electricity consumption costs.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The table below summarizes the sensitivity of the fair value of the Companys risk management positions to fluctuations in commodity prices, with all other variables held constant. The Company has used a 10 percent variability to assess the potential impact of commodity price changes. Fluctuations in commodity prices could have resulted in unrealized gains (losses) impacting pre-tax net earnings as at December 31, 2011 as follows:
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
10% Price |
|
10% Price |
|
|
10% Price |
|
10% Price |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Natural gas price |
|
$ |
(305 |
) |
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
(447 |
) |
$ |
447 |
|
Power price |
|
6 |
|
(6 |
) |
|
10 |
|
(10 |
) | ||||
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk arises from the potential that the Company may incur a loss if a counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its obligation in accordance with agreed terms. This credit risk exposure is mitigated through the use of Board-approved credit policies governing the Companys credit portfolio including credit practices that limit transactions according to counterparties credit quality. As at December 31, 2011, cash equivalents include high-grade, short-term securities, placed primarily with governments and financial institutions with strong investment grade ratings. Any foreign currency agreements entered into are with major financial institutions in Canada and the U.S. or with counterparties having investment grade credit ratings.
A substantial portion of the Companys accounts receivable are with customers in the oil and gas industry and are subject to normal industry credit risks. As at December 31, 2011, approximately 95 percent (94 percent at December 31, 2010) of Encanas accounts receivable and financial derivative credit exposures are with investment grade counterparties.
As at December 31, 2011, Encana had four counterparties (2010 four counterparties) whose net settlement position individually account for more than 10 percent of the fair value of the outstanding in-the-money net risk management contracts by counterparty. The maximum credit risk exposure associated with accounts receivable and accrued revenues, and risk management assets is the total carrying value.
LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk the Company will encounter difficulties in meeting a demand to fund its financial liabilities as they come due. The Company minimizes its liquidity risk by maintaining access to capital markets and managing its capital structure as discussed in Note 19.
In managing liquidity risk, the Company has access to cash equivalents and a wide range of funding at competitive rates through commercial paper, debt capital markets and committed revolving bank credit facilities. As at December 31, 2011, Encana had available unused committed revolving bank credit facilities totaling $4.9 billion, which include C$4.0 billion ($3.9 billion) on a revolving bank credit facility for Encana and $999 million on a revolving bank credit facility for a U.S. subsidiary that remains committed through October 2015.
Encana also had unused capacity under two shelf prospectuses for up to $5.0 billion, the availability of which is dependent on market conditions, to issue up to C$2.0 billion ($2.0 billion) of debt securities in Canada and up to $3.0 billion in the U.S. These shelf prospectuses expire in June 2013 and May 2012, respectively. The Company believes it has sufficient funding through the use of these facilities to meet foreseeable borrowing requirements.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The timing of cash outflows relating to financial liabilities are outlined in the table below:
|
|
Less than |
|
1 3 Years |
|
4 5 Years |
|
6 9 Years |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
Risk Management Liabilities |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
|
7 |
| ||||||
Current and Long-Term Debt (1) |
|
965 |
|
2,373 |
|
762 |
|
3,181 |
|
7,738 |
|
|
15,019 |
| ||||||
(1) Principal and interest.
Encanas current and long-term debt obligations were $15.0 billion at December 31, 2011. Further information on current and long-term debt is contained in Note 17.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK
Foreign exchange risk arises from changes in foreign exchange rates that may affect the fair value or future cash flows of the Companys financial assets or liabilities. As Encana operates primarily in North America, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollars can have a significant effect on the Companys reported results. Encanas functional currency is Canadian dollars; however, the Company reports its results in U.S. dollars as most of its revenue is closely tied to the U.S. dollar and to facilitate a more direct comparison to other North American oil and gas companies. As the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations are embedded in the Companys results, the total effect of foreign exchange fluctuations is not separately identifiable.
To mitigate the exposure to the fluctuating U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate, Encana maintains a mix of both U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar debt. As at December 31, 2011, Encana had $5.9 billion in U.S. dollar debt issued from Canada that was subject to foreign exchange exposure ($5.4 billion at December 31, 2010) and $2.2 billion in debt that was not subject to foreign exchange exposure ($2.3 billion at December 31, 2010).
Encanas foreign exchange (gain) loss primarily includes unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses on the translation of U.S. dollar denominated debt issued from Canada, unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses on the translation of U.S. dollar denominated risk management assets and liabilities held in Canada and foreign exchange gains and losses on U.S. dollar denominated cash and short-term investments held in Canada. A $0.01 change in the U.S. to Canadian dollar exchange rate would have resulted in a $48 million change in foreign exchange (gain) loss at December 31, 2011 (2010 $49 million). The Company may enter into forward sales or purchases of U.S. or Canadian dollars to mitigate foreign exchange risk.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Interest rate risk arises from changes in market interest rates that may affect the fair value or future cash flows from the Companys financial assets or liabilities. The Company may partially mitigate its exposure to interest rate changes by holding a mix of both fixed and floating rate debt.
At December 31, 2011, the Company had no floating rate debt. Accordingly, the sensitivity in net earnings for each one percent change in interest rates on floating rate debt was nil (2010 nil).
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
23. |
Supplementary Information |
A) NET CHANGE IN NON-CASH WORKING CAPITAL
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable and accrued revenues |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
Inventories |
|
2 |
|
|
6 |
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
96 |
|
|
(50 |
) | ||
Income tax payable |
|
(144 |
) |
|
(2,136 |
) | ||
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
B) SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Paid |
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
Income Taxes Paid (Recovered) |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
24. |
Related Party Transactions |
REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
For the years ended December 31 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Directors Fees |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Short-term Wages and Benefits |
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
| ||
Share-Based Compensation |
|
18 |
|
|
14 |
| ||
Post-Employment Benefits |
|
- |
|
|
2 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
Remuneration of Directors and Senior Management includes all amounts earned and awarded to the Companys Board of Directors and Senior Management. Senior Management includes Encanas President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice-President and President of the Canadian Division, Executive Vice-President and President of the USA Division, and Executive Vice-President and Chief Corporate Officer.
Directors fees include Board and Committee Chair retainers and meeting fees. Short-term wages and benefits include salary, benefits and bonuses earned or awarded during the year. Share-based compensation includes expenses related to the Companys long-term incentive compensation plans as disclosed in Note 21. Post-employment benefits represent the estimated cost of providing pension and other post-employment benefit plans to Senior Management in respect of the current year of service as disclosed in Note 21.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
25. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
COMMITMENTS
As at December 31, 2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Transportation and Processing |
|
$ |
747 |
|
$ |
795 |
|
$ |
856 |
|
$ |
860 |
|
$ |
767 |
|
$ |
5,053 |
|
|
$ |
9,078 |
|
Purchases of Goods and Services |
|
531 |
|
198 |
|
128 |
|
87 |
|
46 |
|
72 |
|
|
1,062 |
| |||||||
Operating Leases |
|
52 |
|
47 |
|
44 |
|
39 |
|
33 |
|
94 |
|
|
309 |
| |||||||
Capital Commitments |
|
166 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
7 |
|
80 |
|
|
275 |
| |||||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
$ |
1,035 |
|
$ |
994 |
|
$ |
853 |
|
$ |
5,299 |
|
|
$ |
10,724 |
|
Encana has entered into various commitments primarily related to demand charges for firm transportation, procurement arrangements for goods and services, as well as other minor spending commitments. Operating leases consists of rent for office space, excluding rental payments for The Bow (See Note 16). Capital commitments include leasehold improvements related to The Bow.
CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in various legal claims associated with the normal course of operations. The Company believes it has made adequate provision for such legal claims.
26. |
Transition to IFRS |
As disclosed in Note 2, these Consolidated Financial Statements represent Encanas first annual presentation of the financial results of operations and financial position under IFRS as at and for the year ended December 31, 2011, including 2010 comparative periods. As a result, the Company followed IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in preparing its Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior to 2011, the Company prepared its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with previous GAAP.
IFRS 1 requires the presentation of comparative information as at the January 1, 2010 transition date and subsequent comparative periods as well as the consistent and retrospective application of IFRS accounting policies. To assist with the transition, the provisions of IFRS 1 allow for certain mandatory and optional exemptions for first-time adopters to alleviate the retrospective application of all IFRSs.
The following reconciliations present the adjustments made to the Companys previous GAAP financial results of operations and financial position to comply with IFRS 1. A summary of the significant accounting policy changes and applicable exemptions are discussed following the reconciliations. Reconciliations include the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets as at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010, and Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Income, Changes in Shareholders Equity, and Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
IFRS Opening Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
IFRS Adjustments |
|
|
| ||||||
($ millions) |
|
Previous |
|
E&E |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Foreign |
|
IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 26A) |
|
(Note 26E) |
|
(Note 26F) |
|
(Note 26G) |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ 4,275 |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
|
$ 4,275 |
|
Accounts receivable and accrued revenues |
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
Risk management |
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
Inventories |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,795 |
|
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
- |
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
26,173 |
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,288 |
|
Investments and Other Assets |
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
Risk Management |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Goodwill |
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
$ 33,827 |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
|
$ (45 |
) |
$ - |
|
$ 33,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ 2,143 |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
|
$ 38 |
|
$ - |
|
$ 2,181 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
Risk management |
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
Current debt |
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
4,245 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
38 |
|
- |
|
4,283 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
7,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,568 |
|
Other Liabilities and Provisions |
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
Risk Management |
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
787 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
819 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes (Note 26H) |
|
3,386 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
(20 |
) |
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
17,213 |
|
- |
|
26 |
|
48 |
|
- |
|
17,287 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
Paid in surplus |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
(93 |
) |
755 |
|
14,129 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
- |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
16,614 |
|
- |
|
(26 |
) |
(93 |
) |
- |
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
$ 33,827 |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
|
$ (45 |
) |
$ - |
|
$ 33,782 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
IFRS Adjustments |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Previous |
|
E&E |
|
DD&A |
|
Impairments |
|
Divestitures |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Foreign |
|
IFRS |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 26A) |
|
(Note 26B) |
|
(Note 26C) |
|
(Note 26D) |
|
(Note 26E) |
|
(Note 26F) |
|
(Note 26G) |
|
|
| |||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
629 |
|
Accounts receivable and accrued revenues |
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
| |||||||||
Risk management |
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
| |||||||||
Income tax receivable |
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
| |||||||||
Inventories |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| |||||||||
|
|
2,854 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,854 |
| |||||||||
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
- |
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,158 |
| |||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
28,701 |
|
(2,200 |
) |
(89 |
) |
(503 |
) |
146 |
|
97 |
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
26,145 |
| |||||||||
Investments and Other Assets |
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
196 |
| |||||||||
Risk Management |
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
| |||||||||
Goodwill |
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,725 |
| |||||||||
|
|
$ |
34,020 |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
$ |
(89 |
) |
$ |
(503 |
) |
$ |
146 |
|
$ |
97 |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
2,211 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
Risk management |
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
| |||||||||
Current debt |
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
| |||||||||
|
|
2,776 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
58 |
|
- |
|
2,834 |
| |||||||||
Long-Term Debt |
|
7,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,129 |
| |||||||||
Other Liabilities and Provisions |
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1,758 |
| |||||||||
Risk Management |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
| |||||||||
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
953 |
| |||||||||
Deferred Income Taxes (Note 26H) |
|
4,230 |
|
(15 |
) |
(26 |
) |
(126 |
) |
41 |
|
(7 |
) |
(29 |
) |
|
|
4,068 |
| |||||||||
|
|
16,693 |
|
(15 |
) |
(26 |
) |
(126 |
) |
41 |
|
126 |
|
57 |
|
- |
|
16,750 |
| |||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Share capital |
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,319 |
| |||||||||
Retained earnings |
|
13,957 |
|
(27 |
) |
(60 |
) |
(371 |
) |
101 |
|
(27 |
) |
(98 |
) |
789 |
|
14,264 |
| |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
1,051 |
|
- |
|
(3 |
) |
(6 |
) |
4 |
|
(2 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(789 |
) |
250 |
| |||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
17,327 |
|
(27 |
) |
(63 |
) |
(377 |
) |
105 |
|
(29 |
) |
(103 |
) |
- |
|
16,833 |
| |||||||||
|
|
$ |
34,020 |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
$ |
(89 |
) |
$ |
(503 |
) |
$ |
146 |
|
$ |
97 |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
IFRS Adjustments |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except per |
|
Previous |
|
E&E |
|
DD&A |
|
Impairments |
|
Divestitures |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Foreign |
|
IFRS |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 26A) |
|
(Note 26B) |
|
(Note 26C) |
|
(Note 26D) |
|
(Note 26E) |
|
(Note 26F) |
|
(Note 26G) |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
$ |
8,870 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
8,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
| |||||||||
Transportation |
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
| |||||||||
Operating |
|
1,061 |
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
| |||||||||
Purchased product |
|
739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
| |||||||||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
- |
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
| |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
3,242 |
|
(10 |
) |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,318 |
| |||||||||
Impairments |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
| |||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) | |||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
| |||||||||
Administrative |
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
361 |
| |||||||||
Interest |
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
| |||||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
(250 |
) | |||||||||
|
|
6,810 |
|
42 |
|
86 |
|
496 |
|
(143 |
) |
2 |
|
14 |
|
(34 |
) |
7,273 |
| |||||||||
Net Earnings Before Income Tax |
|
2,060 |
|
(42 |
) |
(86 |
) |
(496 |
) |
143 |
|
(2 |
) |
(14 |
) |
34 |
|
1,597 |
| |||||||||
Income tax expense (Note 26H) |
|
561 |
|
(15 |
) |
(26 |
) |
(125 |
) |
42 |
|
(1 |
) |
(9 |
) |
- |
|
427 |
| |||||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(60 |
) |
$ |
(371 |
) |
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Basic |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
| |||||||
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
IFRS Adjustments |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Previous |
|
E&E |
|
DD&A |
|
Impairments |
|
Divestitures |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Foreign |
|
IFRS |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 26A) |
|
(Note 26B) |
|
(Note 26C) |
|
(Note 26D) |
|
(Note 26E) |
|
(Note 26F) |
|
(Note 26G) |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(60 |
) |
$ |
(371 |
) |
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
296 |
|
- |
|
(3 |
) |
(6 |
) |
4 |
|
(2 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(34 |
) |
250 |
| |||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(63 |
) |
$ |
(377 |
) |
$ |
105 |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
IFRS Adjustments |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Previous |
|
E&E |
|
DD&A |
|
Impairments |
|
Divestitures |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Foreign |
|
IFRS |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 26A) |
|
(Note 26B) |
|
(Note 26C) |
|
(Note 26D) |
|
(Note 26E) |
|
(Note 26F) |
|
(Note 26G) |
|
|
| |||||||||
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
Common Shares Issued under Option Plans |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| |||||||||
Share-Based Compensation |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| |||||||||
Common Shares Purchased |
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) | |||||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Paid in Surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
6 |
|
Common Shares Purchased |
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) | |||||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
13,493 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
$ |
(93 |
) |
$ |
755 |
|
$ |
14,129 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
1,499 |
|
(27 |
) |
(60 |
) |
(371 |
) |
101 |
|
(1 |
) |
(5 |
) |
34 |
|
1,170 |
| |||||||||
Dividends on Common Shares |
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(590 |
) | |||||||||
Charges for Normal Course Issuer Bid |
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445 |
) | |||||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
13,957 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(60 |
) |
$ |
(371 |
) |
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(98 |
) |
$ |
789 |
|
$ |
14,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
755 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(755 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
296 |
|
- |
|
(3 |
) |
(6 |
) |
4 |
|
(2 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(34 |
) |
250 |
| |||||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
$ |
(6 |
) |
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
(789 |
) |
$ |
250 |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
17,327 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(63 |
) |
$ |
(377 |
) |
$ |
105 |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
$ |
(103 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
16,833 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
IFRS Adjustments |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
Previous |
|
E&E |
|
DD&A |
|
Impairments |
|
Divestitures |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Foreign |
|
IFRS |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 26A) |
|
(Note 26B) |
|
(Note 26C) |
|
(Note 26D) |
|
(Note 26E) |
|
(Note 26F) |
|
(Note 26G) |
|
|
| |||||||||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(60 |
) |
$ |
(371 |
) |
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
- |
|
40 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
| |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,318 |
| |||||||||
Impairments |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
| |||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) | |||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
| |||||||||
Deferred income taxes (Note 26H) |
|
774 |
|
(15 |
) |
(26 |
) |
(125 |
) |
42 |
|
(1 |
) |
(9 |
) |
|
|
640 |
| |||||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on risk management |
|
(945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(945 |
) | |||||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278 |
) | |||||||||
Other |
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
(34 |
) |
79 |
| |||||||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) | |||||||||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,990 |
) | |||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities |
|
2,365 |
|
(2 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,363 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
(4,773 |
) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(4,764 |
) | |||||||||
Acquisitions |
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(733 |
) | |||||||||
Proceeds from divestitures |
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
| |||||||||
Net change in investments and other |
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) | |||||||||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) | |||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Investing Activities |
|
(4,729 |
) |
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(4,727 |
) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Issuance of revolving debt |
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,660 |
| |||||||||
Repayment of revolving debt |
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,660 |
) | |||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) | |||||||||
Issuance of common shares |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| |||||||||
Purchase of common shares |
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499 |
) | |||||||||
Dividends on common shares |
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(590 |
) | |||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
(1,284 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1,284 |
) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss) on Cash and Cash Equivalents Held in Foreign Currency |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(3,646 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(3,646 |
) | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year |
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,275 |
| |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Cash, End of Year |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126 |
| |||||||
Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
| |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The following discussion explains the significant differences between Encanas previous GAAP accounting policies and those applied by the Company under IFRS. IFRS policies have been retrospectively and consistently applied except where specific IFRS 1 optional and mandatory exemptions permitted an alternative treatment upon transition to IFRS for first-time adopters. The descriptive note captions below correspond to the adjustments presented in the preceding reconciliations.
Accounting for Upstream Activities
The most significant changes to the Companys accounting policies relate to the accounting for upstream costs. Under previous GAAP, Encana followed the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) guideline on full cost accounting in which all costs directly associated with the acquisition of, the exploration for, and the development of natural gas, oil and NGLs reserves were capitalized on a country-by-country cost centre basis. Costs accumulated within each country cost centre were depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves determined using estimated future prices and costs. Upon transition to IFRS, the Company was required to adopt new accounting policies for upstream activities, including exploration and evaluation costs and development costs.
Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation costs are those expenditures for an area where technical feasibility and commercial viability has not yet been determined. Development costs include those expenditures for areas where technical feasibility and commercial viability has been determined. Encana adopted the IFRS 1 exemption whereby the Company deemed its January 1, 2010 IFRS upstream asset costs to be equal to its previous GAAP historical upstream property, plant and equipment net book value. Accordingly, exploration and evaluation costs were deemed equal to the unproved properties balance and the development costs were deemed equal to the upstream full cost pool balance. Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation costs are presented as exploration and evaluation assets and development costs are presented within property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
IFRS Adjustments
A) Exploration and Evaluation (E&E)
Exploration and evaluation assets at January 1, 2010 were deemed to be $1,885 million, representing the unproved properties balance under previous GAAP. This resulted in a reclassification of $1,885 million from property, plant and equipment to exploration and evaluation assets on Encanas Consolidated Balance Sheet as at January 1, 2010. As at December 31, 2010, the Companys exploration and evaluation assets were $2,158 million, including $1,114 million in the Canadian Division and $1,044 million in the USA Division.
Under previous GAAP, exploration and evaluation costs were capitalized as property, plant and equipment in accordance with the CICAs full cost accounting guidelines. Under IFRS, Encana capitalizes these costs initially as exploration and evaluation assets. Once technical feasibility and commercial viability of the area has been determined, the capitalized costs are transferred from exploration and evaluation assets to property, plant and equipment. Under IFRS, unrecoverable exploration and evaluation costs associated with an area and costs incurred prior to obtaining the legal rights to explore are expensed.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Encana transferred $303 million of capitalized exploration and evaluation costs to property, plant and equipment and expensed $50 million of unrecoverable exploration and evaluation assets and $15 million in direct exploration costs. The application of IFRS for exploration and evaluation costs resulted in a $27 million decrease, after tax, to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
B) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A)
Development costs at January 1, 2010 were deemed to be $23,216 million, representing the upstream full cost pool balance under previous GAAP. Consistent with previous GAAP, these costs are capitalized as property, plant and equipment under IFRS.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Under previous GAAP, development costs were depleted using the unit-of-production method calculated for each country cost centre. Under IFRS, development costs are depleted using the unit-of-production method calculated at the established area level. The IFRS 1 exemption permitted the Company to allocate development costs to the area level using proved reserves values for each Division as at January 1, 2010.
Depleting at an area level under IFRS resulted in an $86 million increase to Encanas DD&A expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. Encanas net earnings decreased $60 million, after tax, compared to previous GAAP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 as a result of depleting at an area level under IFRS.
C) Impairments
Under previous GAAP, an upstream impairment was recognized if the carrying amount exceeded the undiscounted cash flows from proved reserves for a country cost centre. An impairment was measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeded the sum of the fair value of the proved and probable reserves and the costs of unproved properties. Impairments recognized under previous GAAP were not reversed.
Under IFRS, an upstream impairment is recognized if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount for a cash-generating unit. Upstream areas are aggregated into cash-generating units based on their ability to generate largely independent cash flows. If the carrying value of the cash-generating unit exceeds the recoverable amount, the cash-generating unit is written down with an impairment recognized in net earnings. Impairments recognized under IFRS are reversed when there has been a subsequent increase in the recoverable amount. Impairment reversals are recognized in net earnings and the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit is increased to its revised recoverable amount as if no impairment had been recognized for the prior periods.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Encana recognized an after-tax impairment of $371 million relating to the Companys Canadian offshore upstream assets which form a cash-generating unit under IFRS. The impairment recognized was based on the difference between the December 31, 2010 net book value of the assets and the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount was determined using fair value less costs to sell based on after-tax discounted future cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs. Under previous GAAP, these assets were included in the Canadian cost centre ceiling test, which was not impaired at December 31, 2010.
D) Divestitures
Under previous GAAP, proceeds from divestitures of upstream assets were deducted from the full cost pool without recognition of a gain or loss unless the deduction resulted in a change to the country cost centre depletion rate of 20 percent or greater, in which case a gain or loss was recorded.
Under IFRS, gains or losses are recorded on divestitures and are calculated as the difference between the proceeds and the net book value of the asset disposed. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Encana recognized a $143 million net gain on divestitures under IFRS compared to previous GAAP results. The net gain arose from the Canadian and USA Divisions, totaling $90 million and $53 million, respectively. Accounting for divestitures under IFRS resulted in an after-tax increase of $101 million to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
E) Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO)
Under previous GAAP, the asset retirement obligation was measured as the estimated fair value of the retirement and decommissioning expenditures expected to be incurred. Liabilities were not remeasured to reflect period end discount rates.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Under IFRS, the asset retirement obligation is measured as the best estimate of the expenditure to be incurred and requires that the asset retirement obligation be remeasured using the period end discount rate.
In conjunction with the IFRS 1 exemption regarding upstream assets discussed above, Encana was required to remeasure its asset retirement obligation upon transition to IFRS and recognize the difference in retained earnings. The application of this exemption resulted in a $32 million increase to the asset retirement obligation on Encanas Consolidated Balance Sheet as at January 1, 2010 and a corresponding after-tax charge to retained earnings of $26 million. Subsequent IFRS remeasurements of the obligation are recorded through property, plant and equipment with an offsetting adjustment to the asset retirement obligation. As at December 31, 2010, excluding the January 1, 2010 adjustment, Encanas asset retirement obligation increased by $101 million, which primarily reflects the remeasurement of the obligation using Encanas discount rate of 5.4 percent as at December 31, 2010.
F) Compensation
Share-based payments
Under previous GAAP, Encana accounted for certain stock-based compensation plans whereby the obligation and compensation costs were accrued over the vesting period using the intrinsic value method. The intrinsic value of a share unit is the amount by which the Companys share price exceeds the exercise price of the share unit.
For these stock-based compensation plans, IFRS requires the liability for share-based payments be fair valued using an option pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes-Merton model, at each reporting date. Accordingly, upon transition to IFRS, the Company recorded a fair value adjustment of $38 million as at January 1, 2010 to increase the share-based compensation liability with a corresponding charge to retained earnings. Encana elected to use the IFRS 1 exemption whereby the liabilities for share-based payments that had vested or settled prior to January 1, 2010 were not required to be retrospectively restated. Subsequent IFRS fair value adjustments are recorded through property, plant and equipment, exploration and evaluation expenses, operating expenses and administrative expenses with an offsetting adjustment to the share-based compensation liability.
In addition to the January 1, 2010 adjustment discussed above, the IFRS fair value remeasurements subsequent to transition increased the current liability for share-based payments by $20 million as at December 31, 2010 in comparison to previous GAAP.
Pensions
Encana elected to use the IFRS 1 exemption whereby the cumulative unamortized net actuarial gains and losses of the Companys defined benefit plan are charged to retained earnings on January 1, 2010. This resulted in a $75 million increase to the accrued benefit obligation and a corresponding $55 million after-tax charge to retained earnings.
The application of IFRS for share-based payments and pension plans resulted in a $5 million decrease, after-tax, to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
G) Foreign Currency
As permitted by IFRS 1, the Company elected to apply the exemption to set the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to zero upon transition to IFRS. Accordingly, $755 million was recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2010. The reclassification had no impact on total shareholders equity as at January 1, 2010. As a result of the election, the accounts of the Company have not been retrospectively restated using IFRS foreign currency principles.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Future foreign currency translation gains and losses that are recognized from the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment will differ under IFRS compared to previous GAAP due to the exemption taken above. The application of the IFRS exemption resulted in a $34 million increase to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. This arose due to the reversal of a foreign exchange loss recorded under previous GAAP that had been recognized in retained earnings under IFRS as a result of the exemption.
The IFRS adjustments discussed in A) through F) and H) are recorded in the Companys functional currency and are subject to translation for presentation purposes. The associated foreign currency impacts are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income.
H) Income Tax
Deferred income taxes have been adjusted to reflect the tax effect arising from the differences between IFRS and previous GAAP. Upon transition to IFRS, the Company recognized a $26 million reduction in the deferred income tax liability with a corresponding increase to retained earnings. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, the application of the IFRS adjustments as discussed in A) through G) above resulted in a $134 million decrease to the Companys deferred income tax expense and a corresponding increase to Encanas previous GAAP net earnings.
I) Other Exemptions
Other significant IFRS 1 exemptions taken by Encana at January 1, 2010 include the following:
· Business combinations and joint ventures entered into prior to January 1, 2010 were not retrospectively restated under IFRS.
· Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of qualifying assets were not retrospectively restated prior to January 1, 2010.
· Leases were not reassessed to determine whether an arrangement contained a lease under International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease for contracts that were already assessed under previous GAAP.
The remaining IFRS 1 exemptions were not applicable or material to the preparation of Encanas Consolidated Balance Sheet at the date of transition to IFRS on January 1, 2010.
J) Net Earnings Per Common Share
The following table summarizes the common shares used in calculating net earnings per common share:
(millions) |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
739.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
741.7 |
|
As Encana has stock-based compensation plans that may be settled in common shares or cash at the employees option, IFRS requires the more dilutive of cash-settled and equity-settled be used in calculating diluted net earnings per common share regardless of how the share plan is accounted for. As a result, share units that are accounted for as cash-settled may require an adjustment to the denominator for potentially dilutive share units and a corresponding adjustment to the numerator for any changes in net earnings that would result if the share units had been reported as equity instruments for the purposes of calculating diluted net earnings per common share.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, diluted net earnings per common share was calculated using the more dilutive equity-settled method. Accordingly, net earnings were reduced by $17 million for the purposes of calculating diluted net earnings per common share.
27. United States Accounting Principles and Reporting |
In December 2011, Encana announced that it will adopt U.S. GAAP for 2012 financial reporting. As a result, the Company will report its 2012 results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As disclosed in Note 2, Encanas December 31, 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared using accounting policies in accordance with IFRS. These policies vary in certain respects from U.S. GAAP.
In preparation for the Companys adoption of U.S. GAAP, the following IFRS to U.S. GAAP reconciliations have been prepared for comparative purposes as at and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. A summary of the significant U.S. GAAP accounting policy changes are discussed following the reconciliations. Reconciliations include the Companys Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Income, Changes in Shareholders Equity, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
($ millions, except per share amounts) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
$ |
8,467 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
| |||||||
Transportation |
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978 |
| |||||||
Operating |
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081 |
| |||||||
Purchased product |
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635 |
| |||||||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
142 |
|
(142) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| |||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
3,423 |
|
(1,141) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,282 |
| |||||||
Impairments IFRS |
|
1,304 |
|
(1,304) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| |||||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
- |
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,249 |
| |||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(326) |
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
| |||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
51 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
| |||||||
Administrative |
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
| |||||||
Interest |
|
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468 |
| |||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
133 |
| |||||||
|
|
8,465 |
|
9 |
|
(1) |
|
9 |
|
- |
|
(37 |
) |
|
8,445 |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Earnings Before Income Tax |
|
2 |
|
(9) |
|
1 |
|
(9 |
) |
- |
|
37 |
|
|
22 |
| |||||||
Income tax expense (Note 27D) |
|
(126) |
|
166 |
|
- |
|
(2 |
) |
(21 |
) |
- |
|
|
17 |
| |||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
(175) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Earnings per Common Share (Note 27G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
| |||||
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
(175) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Compensation plans |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(34) |
| |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
(55) |
|
(210) |
|
(1) |
|
(5 |
) |
3 |
|
(37 |
) |
|
(305) |
| |||||||
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
(385) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(334) |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
($ millions, except per share amounts) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Revenues, Net of Royalties |
|
$ |
8,870 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Production and mineral taxes |
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
| |||||||
Transportation |
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
| |||||||
Operating |
|
1,060 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,068 |
| |||||||
Purchased product |
|
739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
| |||||||
Exploration and evaluation |
|
65 |
|
(65) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| |||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
3,318 |
|
(1,310) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,008 |
| |||||||
Impairments |
|
496 |
|
(496) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| |||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(141) |
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| |||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
48 |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
| |||||||
Administrative |
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
362 |
| |||||||
Interest |
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
| |||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
(250) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(251) |
| |||||||
|
|
7,273 |
|
(1,715) |
|
(2) |
|
(4 |
) |
- |
|
(1 |
) |
|
5,551 |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Earnings Before Income Tax |
|
1,597 |
|
1,715 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
|
3,319 |
| |||||||
Income tax expense (Note 27D) |
|
427 |
|
535 |
|
1 |
|
13 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
976 |
| |||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Earnings per Common Share (Note 27G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Basic |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.17 |
| |||||
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.17 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Compensation plans |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
| |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
250 |
|
(12) |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
(8 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
232 |
| |||||||
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
Debt |
|
|
U.S. |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
(Note 27F) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Current Assets |
|
$ |
4,927 |
|
$ |
(793 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
4,066 |
|
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
2,458 |
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
23,913 |
|
(7,781 |
) |
(103 |
) |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,057 |
| ||||||||
Investments and Other Assets |
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
31 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
864 |
| ||||||||
Risk Management |
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
| ||||||||
Goodwill |
|
1,616 |
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,698 |
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
$ |
(10,950 |
) |
$ |
(103 |
) |
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
22,926 |
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|
$ |
2,820 |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
2,875 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
7,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
7,658 |
| ||||||||
Other Liabilities and Provisions |
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123 |
| ||||||||
Risk Management |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
| ||||||||
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
1,043 |
|
17 |
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
921 |
| ||||||||
Deferred Income Taxes (Note 27D) |
|
4,086 |
|
(3,359 |
) |
7 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
765 |
| ||||||||
|
|
17,594 |
|
(3,359 |
) |
(132 |
) |
79 |
|
31 |
|
- |
|
135 |
|
|
14,348 |
| ||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Share capital |
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,354 |
| ||||||||
Common shares, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Outstanding: 736.3 million shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Paid in surplus |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| ||||||||
Retained earnings |
|
13,804 |
|
(7,303 |
) |
28 |
|
(41 |
) |
(128 |
) |
(717 |
) |
|
|
|
5,643 |
| ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
195 |
|
(288 |
) |
1 |
|
(41 |
) |
(8 |
) |
717 |
|
|
|
|
576 |
| ||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
16,324 |
|
(7,591 |
) |
29 |
|
(48 |
) |
(136 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
|
8,578 |
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
33,918 |
|
$ |
(10,950 |
) |
$ |
(103 |
) |
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
22,926 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
Debt |
|
|
U.S. |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
(Note 27F) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Current Assets |
|
$ |
2,854 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
2,764 |
|
Exploration and Evaluation |
|
2,158 |
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
26,145 |
|
(8,884 |
) |
(97 |
) |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,193 |
| ||||||||
Investments and Other Assets |
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
253 |
| ||||||||
Risk Management |
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
| ||||||||
Goodwill |
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,725 |
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
$ |
(11,042 |
) |
$ |
(97 |
) |
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
22,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|
$ |
2,834 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
7,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
7,182 |
| ||||||||
Other Liabilities and Provisions |
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781 |
| ||||||||
Risk Management |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
| ||||||||
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
953 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
| ||||||||
Deferred Income Taxes (Note 27D) |
|
4,068 |
|
(3,836 |
) |
7 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
| ||||||||
|
|
16,750 |
|
(3,836 |
) |
(126 |
) |
36 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
123 |
|
|
12,947 |
| ||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Share capital |
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
| ||||||||
Common shares, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Outstanding: 736.3 million shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Retained earnings |
|
14,264 |
|
(7,128 |
) |
27 |
|
(34 |
) |
(149 |
) |
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
6,226 |
| ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
250 |
|
(78 |
) |
2 |
|
(2 |
) |
(11 |
) |
754 |
|
|
|
|
915 |
| ||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
16,833 |
|
(7,206 |
) |
29 |
|
(3 |
) |
(160 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
|
9,493 |
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
33,583 |
|
$ |
(11,042 |
) |
$ |
(97 |
) |
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
22,440 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,352 |
|
Common Shares Issued under Option Plans |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Paid in Surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Share-Based Compensation |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
14,264 |
|
$ |
(7,128) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
$ |
(149) |
|
$ |
(754) |
|
|
$ |
6,226 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
128 |
|
(175) |
|
1 |
|
(7 |
) |
21 |
|
37 |
|
|
5 |
| |||||||
Dividends on Common Shares |
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(588) |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
$ |
(7,303) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
$ |
(128) |
|
$ |
(717) |
|
|
$ |
5,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
250 |
|
$ |
(78) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(11) |
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
Compensation Plans |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(34) |
| |||||||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
(55 |
) |
(210) |
|
(1) |
|
(5 |
) |
3 |
|
(37) |
|
|
(305) |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
195 |
|
$ |
(288) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
$ |
(8) |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
16,324 |
|
$ |
(7,591) |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
$ |
(136) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,578 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,393 |
|
Common Shares Issued under Option Plans |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| |||||||
Share-Based Compensation |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| |||||||
Common Shares Purchased |
|
(48) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48) |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Paid in Surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Common Shares Purchased |
|
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
14,129 |
|
$ |
(8,308) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
(149) |
|
$ |
(755) |
|
|
$ |
4,918 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
1,170 |
|
1,180 |
|
1 |
|
(9 |
) |
- |
|
1 |
|
|
2,343 |
| |||||||
Dividends on Common Shares |
|
(590) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(590) |
| |||||||
Charges for Normal Course Issuer Bid |
|
(445) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445) |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
14,264 |
|
$ |
(7,128) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
$ |
(149) |
|
$ |
(754) |
|
|
$ |
6,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, Beginning of Year |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(66) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(3) |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
$ |
685 |
|
Compensation Plans |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
| |||||||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
250 |
|
(12) |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
(8) |
|
(1) |
|
|
232 |
| |||||||
Balance, End of Year |
|
$ |
250 |
|
$ |
(78) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(11) |
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
16,833 |
|
$ |
(7,206) |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
$ |
(160) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
9,493 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
Debt |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
(Note 27F) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
122 |
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
3,423 |
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,282 |
| ||||||||
Impairments IFRS |
|
1,304 |
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
U.S. GAAP |
|
- |
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,249 |
| ||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(326 |
) |
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
| ||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
51 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
| ||||||||
Deferred income taxes (Note 27D) |
|
48 |
|
166 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
| ||||||||
Cash tax on sale of assets |
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on risk management |
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(879) |
| ||||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
| ||||||||
Other |
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
66 |
| ||||||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
(114) |
| ||||||||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(59) |
| ||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities |
|
4,043 |
|
20 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(114 |
) |
- |
|
(20 |
) |
|
3,929 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Investing Activities |
|
(3,725 |
) |
(20 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
114 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
(3,631) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
(214 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
18 |
|
|
(196) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss) on Cash and Cash Equivalents Held in Foreign Currency |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
101 |
| ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year |
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
699 |
| ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
732 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Cash, End of Year |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730 |
| ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
732 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Adjustments |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
|
IFRS |
|
Full Cost |
|
ARO |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Foreign |
|
Debt |
|
|
U.S. |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Note 27A) |
|
(Note 27B) |
|
(Note 27C) |
|
(Note 27D) |
|
(Note 27E) |
|
(Note 27F) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,343 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
50 |
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
3,318 |
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,008 |
| ||||||||
Impairments |
|
496 |
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestitures |
|
(141 |
) |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| ||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
48 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
| ||||||||
Deferred income taxes (Note 27D) |
|
640 |
|
535 |
|
1 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189 |
| ||||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on risk management |
|
(945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(945 |
) | ||||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
(313 |
) | ||||||||
Other |
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
109 |
| ||||||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) | ||||||||
Net change in non-cash working capital |
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,990 |
) | ||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Operating Activities |
|
2,363 |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
2,365 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Investing Activities |
|
(4,727 |
) |
(2 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
(4,729 |
) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Cash From (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
(1,284 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(36 |
) |
|
(1,320 |
) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss) on Cash and Cash Equivalents Held in Foreign Currency |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(3,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
(3,682 |
) | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year |
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
4,381 |
| ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Cash, End of Year |
|
$ |
126 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
| ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
The following discussion explains the significant differences between Encanas IFRS accounting policies and those applied by the Company under U.S. GAAP. The descriptive note captions below correspond to the adjustments presented in the preceding reconciliations.
U.S. GAAP Adjustments
A) Full Cost Accounting (Full Cost)
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana accounts for upstream activities in accordance with full cost accounting rules whereby all costs directly associated with the acquisition of, the exploration for, and the development of natural gas, oil and NGLs reserves are capitalized on a country-by-country cost centre basis within a full cost pool. Costs accumulated within each cost centre are depleted using the unit-of-production method and are subject to a ceiling test to assess for impairment. Depletion calculations and ceiling test impairments are determined using proved reserves based on 12-month average trailing prices and unescalated costs.
Exploration and evaluation
Under U.S. GAAP, all exploration and evaluation costs are capitalized within the full cost pool and are presented as property, plant and equipment. The exploration and evaluation costs generally represent the unproved properties balance. The cost of unproved properties is excluded, on a cost centre basis, from costs subject to depletion until it is determined whether or not proved reserves are attributable to the properties or impairment has occurred. Costs that have been impaired are included in the costs subject to depletion.
Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation costs are initially capitalized as exploration and evaluation assets. Costs associated with an area determined to be commercially viable are transferred to property, plant and equipment, while unrecoverable costs are expensed.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, exploration and evaluation expense decreased $142 million ($92 million after tax) as the costs were capitalized to the full cost pool. For the year ended December 31, 2010, exploration and evaluation expense decreased $65 million as exploration and evaluation costs of $42 million were capitalized to the full cost pool, $10 million of unrecoverable exploration costs were reclassified to depreciation, depletion and amortization and $13 million of indirect exploration costs were reclassified to operating expense. Cumulatively, these adjustments totaled $27 million after tax.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Under U.S. GAAP, each country cost centre is depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves using 12-month average trailing prices and unescalated costs. Under IFRS, upstream development costs are depleted using the unit-of-production method calculated at an area level based on proved reserves estimated using forecast prices and costs.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, depletion expense decreased by $1,141 million, or $779 million after tax, (2010 $1,310 million, or $883 million after tax), primarily due to previous ceiling test impairments recognized in 2008 and 2009.
Impairments
Under U.S. GAAP, a ceiling test impairment is recognized when the capitalized costs aggregated at the country cost centre level exceed the sum of the estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved reserves, using 12-month average trailing prices and unescalated future development and production costs, discounted at 10 percent, plus unimpaired unproved property costs. Ceiling test impairments are not subsequently reversed.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Under IFRS, impairments are recognized if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount for a cash-generating unit. The recoverable amount is generally determined using after-tax discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, ceiling test impairments of $2,249 million or $1,687 million after tax (2010 nil) were recognized for the Canadian cost centre. The ceiling test impairments primarily resulted from the decline in 12-month trailing natural gas prices. At December 31, 2011, the 12-month trailing prices were based on the following benchmark prices, adjusted for basis differentials to determine local reference prices, transportation costs and tariffs, heat content and quality.
(average for the period) |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
AECO (C$/MMBtu) |
|
3.76 |
|
Henry Hub ($/MMBtu) |
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
Edmonton Light Sweet (C$/bbl) |
|
96.53 |
|
WTI ($/bbl) |
|
96.19 |
|
Under IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2011, impairment expense of $1,304 million, or $854 million after tax (2010 $496 million, or $371 million after tax) was recognized. The IFRS impairments were reversed under U.S. GAAP as the costs were included in the respective country cost centre ceiling test impairment calculations.
Divestitures
Under U.S. GAAP, proceeds from divestitures of properties are deducted from the full cost pool without recognition of a gain or loss unless the deduction significantly alters the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of the cost centre, in which case a gain or loss would be recognized. Under IFRS, gains or losses on divestitures are calculated as the difference between the proceeds and the net book value of the assets disposed of. Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, a net gain on divestiture of $347 million or $213 million after tax, (2010 $143 million, or $101 million after tax) recognized under IFRS was reversed from net earnings and recognized in property, plant and equipment.
Summary
For the year ended December 31, 2011, full cost accounting adjustments reduced net earnings by $175 million. The full cost accounting adjustments included a $142 million reduction to exploration and evaluation expense ($92 million after tax), a $1,141 million reduction to depreciation, depletion and amortization expense ($779 million after tax), a $945 million increase to impairment expense ($833 million after tax) and a $347 million reduction to gain/loss on divestitures ($213 million after tax).
For the year ended December 31, 2010, full cost accounting adjustments increased net earnings by $1,180 million. The full cost accounting adjustments primarily included reductions of $1,310 million to depreciation, depletion and amortization expense ($883 million after tax), $496 million to impairment expense ($371 million after tax) and $143 million to gain/loss on divestitures ($101 million after tax).
As at December 31, 2010, full cost accounting adjustments reduced total assets by $11.0 billion, long-term liabilities by $3.8 billion and shareholders equity by $7.2 billion. The full cost accounting adjustments result primarily from the previous after-tax ceiling test impairments recognized in 2008 and 2009 of $1.1 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively. As at December 31, 2011, full cost accounting adjustments reduced total assets by $11.0 billion, long-term liabilities by $3.4 billion and shareholders equity by $7.6 billion, which include the ceiling test impairment recognized in 2011 of $1.7 billion after tax.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
B) Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO)
Under U.S. GAAP, the asset retirement obligation is measured as the estimated fair value of the retirement and decommissioning expenditures expected to be incurred. Liabilities are not remeasured to reflect period end discount rates. Under IFRS, the asset retirement obligation is measured as the best estimate of the expenditure to be incurred and requires that the asset retirement obligation be remeasured using the period end discount rate.
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana reversed the January 1, 2010 IFRS adjustment of $32 million recognized in retained earnings when the Company remeasured its asset retirement obligation upon transition to IFRS. For the year ended December 31, 2011, net earnings under U.S. GAAP increased by $1 million (2010 $1 million) due to the difference in discount rates used to measure the ARO liability.
As at December 31, 2011, the cumulative U.S. GAAP adjustments related to ARO reduced Encanas total assets by $103 million (2010 $97 million), reduced long-term liabilities by $132 million (2010 $126 million) and increased shareholders equity by $29 million (2010 $29 million).
C) Compensation
Pensions
Under U.S. GAAP, the funded status of defined benefit and pension plans are recognized on the balance sheet as an asset or liability with changes in the funded status recognized in other comprehensive income. Under IFRS, the over-funded or under-funded status arising from defined benefit and pension plans is not recognized on the balance sheet.
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana reversed the January 1, 2010 IFRS adjustment of $75 million recognized in retained earnings when the Company elected to charge the cumulative unamortized net actuarial gains and losses of the Companys defined benefit plan to retained earnings upon transition to IFRS.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, adjustments for the over/under funded status of the defined benefit pension plan decreased comprehensive income by $34 million after tax (2010 - $2 million after tax).
Share-based payments
Under both IFRS and U.S. GAAP, obligations for payments in cash or common shares under share-based compensation plans are accrued over the vesting period using fair values. Upon adoption of IFRS, Encana elected a transition provision whereby share-based compensation plans that had vested or settled prior to the transition date of January 1, 2010 were not retrospectively restated. Under U.S. GAAP, Encana adopted the share-based payment standard in 2006 using the modified-prospective approach. The different adoption dates of the standards and transitional provisions applied resulted in share-based payment adjustments.
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, adjustments for pension and share-based compensation decreased net earnings by $7 million (2010 $9 million).
As at December 31, 2011, the cumulative U.S. GAAP compensation adjustments increased total assets by $31 million (2010 $33 million), increased total liabilities by $79 million (2010 $36 million) and reduced shareholders equity by $48 million (2010 $3 million).
D) Income Taxes
Under U.S. GAAP, income tax is calculated using the enacted income tax rates and legislation expected to apply when the assets are realized or liabilities are settled. Under IFRS, income tax is calculated using the enacted or substantively enacted income tax rates and legislation.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized an additional deferred tax expense of $164 million (2010 $549 million) resulting from the related tax effect on U.S. GAAP adjustments discussed in A) through C) above.
Under IFRS, certain current income tax benefits were recognized in previous years in respect of tax legislation that was considered substantively enacted in Canada but not enacted for U.S. GAAP. For the year ended December 31, 2011, $21 million of current income tax benefits related to this legislation was recognized under U.S. GAAP in respect of a previous taxation year that became statute-barred for Canadian tax purposes. As at December 31, 2011, the current tax benefits related to this legislation in respect of open taxation years that have not yet been recognized under U.S. GAAP totaled $136 million (2010 $160 million).
E) Foreign Currency
Under U.S. GAAP, the settlement of intra-entity foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment nature between entities that are consolidated in the Companys financial statements are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. Under IFRS, the foreign exchange impacts of these transactions are recognized in net earnings. Under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011, a foreign exchange loss of $37 million (2010 $1 million) was reclassified from net earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, net earnings under U.S. GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $37 million (2010 $1 million).
Under U.S. GAAP, Encana reversed the January 1, 2010 IFRS adjustment of $755 million recognized in retained earnings when the Company elected to set the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to zero upon transition to IFRS. The adjustment had no impact on total shareholders equity.
F) Debt Reclassifications (Debt Reclasses)
Under U.S. GAAP, certain items presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are classified differently compared to IFRS.
Under U.S. GAAP, bank overdraft positions are segregated from cash and cash equivalents on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and are reported within accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Similarly, the change in bank overdraft positions is segregated from cash and cash equivalents on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and shown separately as a financing activity.
Under U.S. GAAP, the revolving credit facilities borrowings and commercial paper issuances are reclassified from current debt to long-term debt. The credit facilities are considered long-term as they mature in October 2015 and are used to backstop the commercial paper program. Under U.S. GAAP, debt transaction costs are reclassified from long-term debt to investments and other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
G) Net Earnings per Common Share
Under U.S. GAAP, compensation plans that may be settled at the employees option in either cash or common shares are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation if it is probable that the plan will be settled in cash. Under IFRS, these plans are presumed to be settled in common shares and are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation if they are determined to be dilutive.
U.S. GAAP net earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of Encana common shares outstanding as below. The difference between the basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding reflects the effect of dilutive securities.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in US$ millions, unless otherwise specified)
As at December 31 (millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
736.3 |
|
739.7 |
|
Diluted |
|
737.2 |
|
739.8 |
|
H) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Under U.S. GAAP, as of January 1, 2012, Encana will be required to adopt the following standards and updates issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which should not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements:
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, clarifies and changes existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The changes primarily relate to fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs. The amendments will be applied prospectively and will expand the Companys fair value measurement disclosures.
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, requires that net earnings and comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. Encana currently presents two separate consecutive statements.
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, permits an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the two-step goodwill impairment test is required to be performed as described in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. The amendments will be applied prospectively.
Under U.S. GAAP, as of January 1, 2013, Encana will be required to adopt the following standard issued by the FASB, which should not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements:
· Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, requires disclosure of both gross and net information about financial instruments eligible for offset in the balance sheet and financial instruments subject to master netting arrangements. The amendments will be applied retrospectively and will expand the Companys financial instruments disclosures.
Encana Corporation |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (prepared in US$) |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE
Certifications and Disclosure Regarding Controls and Procedures.
(a) Certifications. See Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3, 99.4, 99.5 and 99.6 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
(b) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of Encana Corporations (Encana) fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, an evaluation of the effectiveness of Encanas disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) was carried out by Encanas management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officers. Based upon that evaluation, Encanas principal executive officer and principal financial officers have concluded that as of the end of that fiscal year, Encanas disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Encana in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to Encanas management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
It should be noted that while Encanas principal executive officer and principal financial officers believe that Encanas disclosure controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance that they are effective, they do not expect that Encanas disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
(c) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The required disclosure is included in the Management Report that accompanies Encanas Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
(d) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm. The required disclosure is included in the Auditors Report that accompanies Encanas Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
(e) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, there were no changes in Encanas internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Encanas internal control over financial reporting.
Notices Pursuant to Regulation BTR.
None.
Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Encanas board of directors has determined that Jane L. Peverett and Bruce G. Waterman, members of Encanas audit committee, each qualifies as an audit committee financial expert (as such term is defined in Form 40-F) and is independent as that term is defined in the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Code of Ethics.
Encana has adopted a code of ethics (as that term is defined in Form 40-F), entitled the Business Conduct & Ethics Practice (the Code of Ethics), that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions.
The Code of Ethics is available for viewing on Encanas website at www.encana.com, and is available in print to any shareholder who requests it. Requests for copies of the Code of Ethics should be made by contacting: Jeffrey G. Paulson, Corporate Secretary, Encana Corporation, 1800, 855-2nd Street S.W., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2S5. Alternatively, requests for a copy of the Code of Ethics may be made by contacting Encanas Corporate Secretarial Department at (403) 645-2000 (Fax: (403) 645-4617).
Since the adoption of the Code of Ethics, there have not been any waivers, including implicit waivers, granted from any provision of the Code of Ethics.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The required disclosure is included under the heading Audit Committee Information- External Auditor Service Fees in Encanas Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.
The required disclosure is included under the heading Audit Committee Information-Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures in Encanas Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
Encana does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.
The required disclosure is included under the heading Contractual Obligations and ContingenciesContractual Obligations in Encanas Managements Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Identification of the Audit Committee.
Encana has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the audit committee are: Barry W. Harrison, Suzanne P. Nimocks, Jane L. Peverett (Chair), Allan P. Sawin, Bruce G. Waterman and David P. OBrien (ex officio).
New York Stock Exchange Disclosure.
Presiding Director at Meetings of Non-Management Directors
Encana schedules regular executive sessions in which Encanas non-management directors (as that term is defined in the rules of the New York Stock Exchange) meet without management participation. Mr. David P. OBrien serves as the presiding director (the Presiding Director) at such sessions. Each of Encanas non-management directors is independent for the purposes of Canadian National Instrument 58-101.
Communication with Non-Management Directors
Shareholders may send communications to Encanas non-management directors by writing to the Presiding Director, c/o Jeffrey G. Paulson, Corporate Secretary, Encana Corporation, 1800, 855 - 2nd Street S.W., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 2S5. Communications will be referred to the Presiding Director for appropriate action. The status of all outstanding concerns addressed to the Presiding Director will be reported to the board of directors as appropriate.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
According to Section 303A.09 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, a listed company must adopt and disclose a set of corporate governance guidelines with respect to specified topics. Such guidelines are required to be posted on the listed companys website. Encana operates under corporate governance principles that are consistent with the requirements of Section 303A.09 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, and which are described under the heading Statement of Corporate Governance Practices in Encanas Information Circular prepared in connection with its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. However, Encana has not codified its corporate governance principles into formal guidelines for posting on its website.
Board Committee Mandates
The Mandates of Encanas audit committee, human resources and compensation committee, and nominating and corporate governance committee are each available for viewing on Encanas website at www.encana.com.
Statement of Governance Differences
As a Canadian corporation listed on the NYSE, Encana is not required to comply with most of the NYSEs corporate governance standards, and instead may comply with Canadian corporate governance practices. Encana is, however, required to disclose the significant difference between its corporate governance practices and those required to be followed by U.S. domestic companies under the NYSEs corporate governance standards.
Encana has prepared a summary of the significant ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those required to be followed by U.S. domestic companies under the NYSEs corporate governance standards, and that summary, entitled Differences in Encanas Corporate Governance Practices Compared to NYSE Corporate Governance Standards, is available for viewing on Encanas website at www.encana.com/about/board-governance/documents-filings.html.
Encanas corporate governance practices meet or exceed all applicable Canadian requirements. They also incorporate some best practices derived from the NYSE rules and comply with applicable rules adopted by the Commission to give effect to the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
A description of Encanas corporate governance practices is included under the heading Statement of Corporate Governance Practices in Encanas Information Circular prepared in connection with its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
UNDERTAKING AND CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS
A. Undertaking.
The registrant undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.
B. Consent to Service of Process.
The registrant has previously filed a Form F-X in connection with the class of securities in relation to which the obligation to file this report arises.
Any change to the name or address of the agent for service of process of the registrant shall be communicated promptly to the Commission by an amendment to the Form F-X referencing the file number of the registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 23, 2012.
|
Encana Corporation | ||
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
By: |
/s/ Sherri A. Brillon | |
|
Name: |
Sherri A. Brillon | |
|
Title: |
Executive Vice-President & | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
By: |
/s/ William A. Stevenson | |
|
Name: |
William A. Stevenson | |
|
Title: |
Executive Vice-President & | |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
99.6 |
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
Consent of McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. |
|
|
|
99.10 |
|
Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton |
|
|
|
99.11 |
|
Consent of GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. |