BED BATH & BEYOND INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

JUNE 23, 2011

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.

650 Liberty Avenue

Union, New Jersey 07083

PROXY STATEMENT

These proxy materials are delivered in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, or “us”), a New York corporation, of proxies to be voted at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournment or adjournments.

QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MEETING AND THESE PROXY MATERIALS

This Proxy Statement, the proxy card and our 2010 Annual Report are being mailed starting May 25, 2011.  The information regarding stock ownership and other matters in this Proxy Statement is as of the record date, May 6, 2011, unless otherwise indicated.

What may I vote on?

You may vote on the following proposals:

·                  election of nine directors to hold office until the Annual Meeting in 2012 (Proposal 1);

·                  ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending February 25, 2012 (“fiscal 2011”) (Proposal 2);

·                  consider the approval, by non-binding vote, of the 2010 compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers (commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal) (Proposal 3); and

·                  to recommend, by non-binding vote, the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (commonly known as a “frequency of say-on-pay” proposal) (Proposal 4).

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NINE DIRECTORS, FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS, FOR THE SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL AND FOR ONCE EVERY YEAR WITH RESPECT TO THE FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL.

Who may vote?

Shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on May 6, 2011 are entitled to receive this notice and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting.  As of that date, there were 249,128,440 shares of common stock outstanding.  Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?

The Company encourages you to use the electronic means available to you to vote your shares.  How you vote will depend on how you hold your shares of Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. stock.

Shareholder of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you.  If you hold restricted stock under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan, you are also considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares.  As the shareholder of record, you have the right to vote by proxy.

There are three ways you can do so:

·                  Vote by Internet - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information.  Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.

·                  Vote by phone - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions.  Have your proxy card in hand when you call.

·                  Vote by mail

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we’ve provided, or return it to Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Voting by any of these methods will not affect your right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.  However, for those who will not be voting at the Annual Meeting, your final voting instructions must be received by no later than 11:59 p.m. on June 22, 2011.

Beneficial Owner

Most shareholders of Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee, rather than directly in their own name.  If you hold your shares in one of these ways, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record.  As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker on how to vote.  Your broker or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction form for you to use in directing the broker or nominee on how to vote your shares.  If you hold your shares through a NYSE member brokerage firm, such member brokerage firm has the discretion to vote shares held on your behalf with respect to the appointment of the Company’s auditors, but not with respect to the election of directors, the say-on-pay proposal or the frequency of say-on-pay proposal, as more fully described under “What is a broker ‘non-vote’?”.

Can I change my vote?

Yes.  If you are the shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy before it is exercised by doing any of the following:

·                  sending a letter to the Company stating that your proxy is revoked;

·                  signing a new proxy and sending it to the Company; or

·                  attending the Annual Meeting and voting by ballot.

Beneficial owners should contact their broker or nominee for instructions on changing their vote.

How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

A “quorum” is necessary to hold the Annual Meeting.  A quorum is a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  They may be present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy.  Abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum, but are not counted for purposes of determining any of the proposals to be voted on.

How many votes are needed to approve the proposals?

At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a “FOR” vote by a majority of votes cast is required for the election of directors, to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2011 and to approve, by non-binding vote, the say-on-pay proposal.  With respect to the frequency of say-on-pay proposal, the alternative receiving the greatest number of votes (every one year, two years or three years) will be the frequency that shareholders approve.

A “FOR” vote by a “majority of votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “FOR” exceeds the number of votes “AGAINST.”  Abstentions and broker non-votes shall not constitute votes “FOR” or votes “AGAINST.”

What is an abstention?

An abstention is a properly signed proxy card which is marked “abstain.”

2

What is a broker “non-vote”?

A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.  Under current applicable rules, Proposal 2 is a “discretionary” item upon which New York Stock Exchange member brokerage firms that hold shares as nominee may vote on behalf of the beneficial owners if such beneficial owners have not furnished voting instructions by the tenth day before the Annual Meeting.

However, New York Stock Exchange member brokerage firms that hold shares as nominee may not vote on behalf of the beneficial owners on the following proposals unless you provide voting instructions: Proposal 1, the election of directors, Proposal 3, the say-on-pay proposal, and Proposal 4, the frequency of say-on-pay proposal.  Therefore, if your shares are held by such nominee, please instruct your broker regarding how to vote your shares on each of these proposals.  This will ensure that your shares are counted with respect to each of these proposals.

Will any other matters be acted on at the Annual Meeting?

If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment, the persons named in the proxy will have discretion to vote on those matters.  As of March 31, 2011, which is the date by which any proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting submitted by a shareholder must have been received by the Company to be presented at the Annual Meeting, and as of the date of this Proxy Statement, we did not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting.

Who pays for this proxy solicitation?

The Company will pay the expenses of soliciting proxies.  In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited in person or by telephone or other means by directors or associates of the Company.  The Company has engaged D.F. King & Co., Inc., for a fee to be determined, to assist in the solicitation of proxies.  The Company will reimburse brokerage firms and other nominees, custodians and fiduciaries for costs incurred by them in mailing proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons.

Whom should I call with other questions?

If you have additional questions about this Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting or would like additional copies of this document or our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, please contact:  Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., 650 Liberty Avenue, Union, NJ 07083, Attention:  Investor Relations Dept., Telephone:  (908) 688-0888.

3

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)

How is the Board of Directors structured and who has been nominated?

The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated for reelection as directors, for a one year term expiring at the 2012 Annual Meeting, each of the current members of the Board.

Information concerning our directors as of the record date, and the key experience, qualifications and skills they bring to our Board, is provided below.

Warren Eisenberg, 80, is a Co-Founder of the Company and has served as Co-Chairman since 1999.  He has served as a director since 1971.  Mr. Eisenberg served as Chairman from 1992 to 1999, and served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from 1971 to 2003.

Leonard Feinstein, 74, is a Co-Founder of the Company and has served as Co-Chairman since 1999.  He has served as a director since 1971.  Mr. Feinstein served as President from 1992 to 1999, and served as Co-Chief Executive Officer from 1971 to 2003.

Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein remain active as part of the senior leadership of the Company and bring to the Board, among other benefits, their experience in building the Company during its 40-year history and their overall experience in the retail industry, in each case for over 50 years.

Steven H. Temares, 52, currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  He was President and Chief Executive Officer from 2003 to 2006 and was President and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2003.  Mr. Temares joined the Company in 1992 and has served as a director since 1999.  Mr. Temares has been part of the leadership of the Company throughout its entire history as a public company.

Dean S. Adler, 54, is a Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Lubert-Adler Partners, L.P., a private real estate investment firm.  He has served as a Principal of Lubert-Adler Partners, L.P. for over ten years.  He has been a director of the Company since 2001.  During the last five years, Mr. Adler also served as a director of Developers Diversified Realty Corp., a shopping center real estate investment trust, and Electronics Boutique, Inc., a mall retailer.  Mr. Adler has wide experience and involvement in commercial real estate including, in particular, retail real estate.

Stanley F. Barshay, 71, has served in a variety of senior executive positions at consumer healthcare companies.  He served as Executive Vice President of Merck & Co. (formerly Schering-Plough Corporation) and President of its Consumer Health Care Division from November 2009 until his retirement on April 1, 2010; prior to November 2009, Mr. Barshay was Chairman, Consumer Health Care, at Schering-Plough Corporation since June 2003.  For many years, Mr. Barshay served in a variety of senior executive positions at American Home Products (now part of Pfizer).  He has been a director of the Company since 2003.  Among other things, Mr. Barshay brings to the Board specialized knowledge about the marketing of consumer goods, and in particular health and beauty care products.

Klaus Eppler, 80, has been a pensioned partner in the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, counsel to the Company, since 2001.  Mr. Eppler was an equity partner of Proskauer Rose LLP from 1965 to 2001, when he ceased active partnership with responsibilities for clients.  He has been a director of the Company since 1992 and has served as outside Lead Director since 2002.  Mr. Eppler is also a director of Ascena Retail Group, Inc. (successor to The Dress Barn, Inc.), an apparel retailer.  Mr. Eppler has served as a director of one or more retailers continuously for over 35 years.  Throughout his career as a practicing attorney, he represented numerous public companies or their boards of directors, including many retail companies.  Mr. Eppler brings to the Board his experience with a wide variety of retailers.

Patrick R. Gaston, 53, is an executive at the Verizon Foundation, and is currently on leave serving a one-year term as Executive in Residence and Senior Advisor with the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund to support the rebuilding efforts in Haiti.  Until January 2011, Mr. Gaston was President of the Verizon Foundation since 2003.  Prior to assuming that position, Mr. Gaston held a variety of management positions at Verizon Communications Inc. and its predecessors since 1984, including positions in operations, marketing, human resources, strategic planning and government relations.  He has been a director of the Company since 2007.

4

Among other things, Mr. Gaston brings to the Board experience with respect to very large and complex public companies as well as extensive experience with other local, national and international organizations through his non-profit work.

Jordan Heller, 50, has been President of Heller Wealth Advisors LLC, a provider of financial advisory services, since 2008.  Mr. Heller was previously a partner with The Schonbraun McCann Group LLP from 2005 to 2008.  Prior to joining The Schonbraun McCann Group, Mr. Heller was a Managing Director at American Economic Planning Group.  He has been a director of the Company since 2003.  Among other things, Mr. Heller brings to the Board experience in and knowledge of various financial matters.  He serves as an “audit committee financial expert” on the Company’s Audit Committee.

Victoria A. Morrison, 58, has been the Executive Vice President & General Counsel of Edison Properties, LLC, a diversified real estate company, since 2007.  Ms. Morrison was previously practicing law as a partner in the law firm of Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP since 1986.  She has been a director of the Company since 2001.  Among other things, Ms. Morrison brings to the Board experience in and knowledge of real estate law and transactions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NINE NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS.

5

OTHER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INFORMATION

How many times did the Board of Directors meet last year?

The Board of Directors held seven meetings during the fiscal year ended February 26, 2011 (“fiscal 2010”).

Director Attendance

Each director of the Company attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which he or she served, other than a director who retired from the Board effective as of the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and who attended one of the three meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period for which such director served as a director during fiscal 2010.  The Company encourages, but does not require, the directors to attend the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  All of the Company’s current directors attended the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

How were directors compensated for fiscal 2010?

The following table provides compensation information for each member of our Board of Directors during fiscal 2010, other than Warren Eisenberg, Leonard Feinstein and Steven H. Temares, each of whom is a named executive officer of the Company and none of whom received any additional compensation for his service as a director of the Company.

Annual director fees for fiscal 2010 were $50,000.  In addition, directors serving on standing committees of the Board of Directors were paid as follows:  an additional $10,000 for Audit Committee members, an additional $7,500 for Compensation Committee members, and (other than for the Lead Director) an additional $5,000 for Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members.  The Lead Director received an additional $15,000 for acting in that capacity.  Director fees are paid on a quarterly basis.  Directors have the right to elect to receive all or fifty percent of their fees in stock or cash.  In addition to the fees above, each director received an automatic grant of restricted stock under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan with a fair market value on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders during such fiscal year (the average of the high and low trading prices on such date) equal to $50,000, such restricted stock to vest on the first trading day following the expiration of any applicable blackout period following the last day of the fiscal year of grant provided that the director remains in office until the last day of the fiscal year.  The following table provides director compensation information for fiscal 2010.

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal 2010

As described more fully below, the following table summarizes the annual cash compensation for the non-employee directors as members of our Board of Directors during fiscal 2010.

(1)                                  Represents the value of 1,318 restricted shares of common stock of the Company granted under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan at fair market value on the date of the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders ($37.96 per share, the average of the high and low trading prices on June 29, 2010).

(2)                                  This director fee was paid in shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to the Bed Bath & Beyond Plan to Pay Directors Fees in Stock and the number of shares was determined (in accordance with the terms of such plan) based on the fair market value per share on the second business day following the announcement of the Company’s financial results for its fiscal third quarter, which was $49.36 per share, the average of the high and low trading prices on December 27, 2010.

(3)                                  Fifty percent of this director fee was paid in shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to the Bed Bath & Beyond Plan to Pay Directors Fees in Stock and the number of shares was determined (in accordance with the terms of such plan) as described in footnote (2).

(4)                                  Ms. Stoller received a prorated annual fee and was not granted a stock award due to her retirement from the Board of Directors effective June 29, 2010.

6

Director Independence

The Board of Directors, upon the advice of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that each of Ms. Morrison and Messrs. Adler, Barshay, Eppler, Gaston and Heller are “independent directors” under the independence standards set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2).  This determination was based on the fact that each of these directors is not an executive officer or employee of the Company or has any other relationship which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  This independence assessment is analyzed annually in both fact and appearance to promote arms-length oversight.

In making its independence determinations, the Board of Directors considered transactions occurring since the beginning of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 (“fiscal 2008”) between the Company and entities associated with the independent directors or members of their immediate family.  In each case, the Board of Directors determined that, because of the nature of the director’s relationship with the entity and/or the amount involved, the relationship did not impair the director’s independence.

The Board of Directors’ independence determinations included reviewing the following relationships and a determination that the amounts involved, in each case, were immaterial (no payments were made to any of the entities noted, during such entity’s last fiscal year, in excess of 1% of such entity’s consolidated gross revenues, where a director was a partner or owned more than a 10% equity interest in, or was an executive of, such entity):

·                  Mr. Adler is a principal or executive officer of several private equity funds, each with broad commercial real estate holdings.  Some of such funds have, among their investments, interests in entities which hold retail properties, and portions of two such properties are under lease to the Company or subsidiaries for the operation of three stores.

·                  Mr. Barshay was an executive officer of Merck & Co. (formerly Schering-Plough Corporation), which manufactures a wide variety of household consumer goods available for sale at many retail outlets (such as cold medicine and sunscreen), some of which are purchased by the Company at market rates for resale in the ordinary course of business.  Effective April 1, 2010, Mr. Barshay retired from his position at Merck.

·                  Mr. Eppler is a (non-equity) pensioned partner of Proskauer Rose LLP.  In 2001, he ceased active partnership with responsibilities for clients.  The firm has received fees for legal services from the Company during the past three fiscal years.

·                  Mr. Gaston is an executive at the Verizon Foundation, the philanthropic entity of Verizon Communications Inc.  He is currently on leave serving a one-year term as Executive in Residence and Senior Advisor with the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund to support the rebuilding efforts in Haiti.  The Company purchases a portion of its telecommunications services from Verizon Communications Inc. on terms and pricing generally available to Verizon customers.

As the Board determined, in each case, that the amounts involved were immaterial, the Board does not believe that the amount and nature of any of these transactions might reasonably impair the ability of the directors to act in shareholders’ best interests.

Information about Committees of the Board; Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are considered independent pursuant to applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NASDAQ rules.  None of the members of the Compensation Committee was (i) during fiscal 2010, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (ii) formerly an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. 

7

None of our executive officers currently serves, or in fiscal 2010 has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

Leadership Structure

Messrs. Eisenberg, Feinstein and Temares function together as the senior leaders of the Company.  Since Messrs. Eisenberg, Feinstein and Temares are not “independent directors” within the meaning of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2), the Board of Directors appointed an independent director to serve as the outside Lead Director.  Mr. Eppler has served as the outside Lead Director since 2002.  The general authority and responsibilities of the outside Lead Director are established by the Board of Directors.  In that capacity, Mr. Eppler presides at all executive sessions of the independent directors, has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors, acts as a liaison between the members of the Board and management, functions as Secretary of the Board (including with respect to the proposal and maintenance of Board agendas and schedules for meetings), arranges for Board committee functions and acts as Secretary of all Board committees (other than when another independent director acts in such capacity), and receives communications from the Company’s shareholders.

Director Qualifications

The Board has adopted a policy regarding specific, minimum qualifications for potential directors.  These factors, and others as considered useful by the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, are reviewed in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at a particular point in time.  The Company’s policies regarding director qualifications and skills are included on the Company’s website at www.bedbathandbeyond.com under the Investor Relations section.

Qualified candidates for membership on the Board will be considered without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, age, gender, sexual orientation or disability.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and evaluates each candidate’s character, judgment, skills (including financial literacy), background, experience and other qualifications (without regard to whether a nominee has been recommended by the Company’s shareholders), as well as the overall composition of the Board, and recommends to the Board for its approval the slate of directors to be nominated for election at the annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders.  While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, the Committee believes that it is desirable that Board members represent a diversity of backgrounds, including gender and race, as well as diversity of viewpoints and experience.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.  Information about each of these Committees follows.

Audit Committee

The function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by (i) overseeing the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the Company’s financial statements, and (ii) reviewing the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to the public.  In addition, the functions of this Committee have included, among other things, recommending to the Board the engagement or discharge of independent auditors, discussing with the auditors their review of the Company’s quarterly results and the results of their annual audit and reviewing the Company’s internal accounting controls.

The Audit Committee held seven meetings during fiscal 2010.  The current members of the Committee are Messrs. Barshay, Gaston and Heller.  The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Heller is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K and all of the members of the Committee meet the applicable independence standards for audit committee members in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).

Compensation Committee

The function of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board of Directors by (i) considering and determining all matters relating to the compensation of the Company’s Co-Chairmen, Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers (as defined in Rule 3b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), and such other key executives as the Committee shall determine; (ii) administering and functioning as the Committee that is authorized to make grants and awards of equity compensation to executive officers and such other key executives as the Committee shall determine under the Company’s equity compensation plans; and (iii) reviewing and reporting to the Board on such other matters as may be appropriately delegated by the Board for the Committee’s consideration. 

8

The Committee has the authority to engage consultants and other advisors.

The Compensation Committee held nine meetings during fiscal 2010.  The members of the Committee during fiscal 2010 were Messrs. Adler and Eppler and Ms. Morrison.  In addition to meeting the NASDAQ independence requirements, these members are “non-employee directors” for applicable SEC rules and are “outside directors” for purposes of applicable tax law.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The function of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to assist the Board of Directors by (i) reviewing and recommending changes in certain policies regarding the nomination of directors to the Board for its approval; (ii) identifying individuals qualified to become directors; (iii) evaluating and recommending for the Board’s selection nominees to fill positions on the Board; and (iv) recommending changes in the Company’s corporate governance policies to the Board for its approval.  The Committee also oversees Board and management succession planning.  The Committee’s policy is to identify potential nominees based on properly submitted suggestions from any source and has established procedures to do so.  In addition, the Board may determine that it requires a director with a particular expertise or qualification and will actively recruit such a candidate.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to retain third party search firms to evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.  Shareholders wishing to propose a director candidate for nomination must provide timely notice of such nomination in accordance with the Company’s By-laws.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting during fiscal 2010.  The members of the Committee during fiscal 2010 were Messrs. Barshay and Eppler and Ms. Morrison.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Company’s Audit Committee, among other things, reviews and approves, on an annual basis and as otherwise appropriate, any proposed related party transactions.  The members of the Committee also consult with the Company’s independent auditors to ensure that the Committee considers all transactions which the auditors advise may involve transactions with related persons.  The Committee’s determinations with respect to all related party transactions are recorded in the minutes of the Committee, and the Audit Committee’s responsibility to review and approve related party transactions is set forth in the Committee’s charter.

Committee Charters; Additional Information; Risk Management

A complete copy of the charter of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as well as the Company’s policies on director attendance at the Annual Meeting and how shareholders can communicate with the Board of Directors, are available on the Company’s website at www.bedbathandbeyond.com.

Management regularly reports to the Board of Directors with respect to compliance and risk management matters through a formal risk management process and committee.  The committee, which consists of a number of key executives, meets with executives of each business unit to identify and assess the significant risks in each such unit’s areas of responsibility, then analyzes what risk mitigation efforts are or should be in place to eliminate or minimize such risks to acceptable levels.

9

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS (PROPOSAL 2)

Who has been appointed as the Auditors?

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP to serve as our independent auditors for fiscal 2011, subject to ratification by our shareholders.  Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer questions.  They will also have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.  If the proposal to ratify their appointment is not approved, other certified public accountants will be considered by the Audit Committee.  Even if the proposal is approved, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of new independent auditors at any time during the year if it believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

What were the fees incurred by the Company for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP?

The fees incurred by the Company for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for fiscal 2010 and the fiscal year ended February 27, 2010 (“fiscal 2009”) were as follows:

In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” included fees associated with the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements, the assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as integrated with the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements and the quarterly reviews of the financial statements included in its Form 10-Q filings.  In fiscal 2010, “audit-related fees” included fees associated with the implementation of XBRL reporting requirements.  In fiscal 2009, “audit-related fees” included fees associated with the Company’s response to an SEC comment letter and the implementation of XBRL reporting requirements.  In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, “tax fees” included fees associated with tax planning, tax compliance (including review of tax returns) and tax advice (including tax audit assistance).  In fiscal 2010, “all other fees” consisted of a subscription fee to a KPMG sponsored research tool.  There were no “all other fees” in fiscal 2009.  The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of the foregoing services is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP’s independence.

In accordance with the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to the Company by its outside auditor.  To the extent permitted by applicable laws, regulations and NASDAQ rules, the Committee may delegate pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to one or more members of the Committee.  Such member(s) must then report to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting if such member(s) pre-approved any audit or non-audit services.

In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, all (100%) audit and non-audit services were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee charter.

10

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR FISCAL 2011.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Board of Directors has determined that the membership of the Audit Committee meets the SEC and NASDAQ independence and experience requirements.  The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Heller qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.”

The Audit Committee discussed the auditors’ review of quarterly financial information with the auditors prior to the release of that information and the filing of the Company’s quarterly reports with the SEC; the Audit Committee also met and held discussions with management and the independent auditors with respect to the audited year end financial statements. 

Further, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114, as amended (Communication With Audit Committees), received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.  The Committee also discussed with the auditors and the Company’s financial management matters related to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Based on these discussions and the written disclosures received from the independent auditors, the Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 26, 2011, filed with the SEC on April 26, 2011.

This audit committee report is not deemed filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not incorporated by reference into any filings that the Company may make with the SEC.

11

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is information concerning our executive officers as of May 6, 2011.

The biographies for Messrs. Eisenberg, Feinstein and Temares are set forth above under Election of Directors (Proposal 1).  Biographies for our other executive officers are as follows:

Arthur Stark has been President and Chief Merchandising Officer since 2006.  Mr. Stark has served as Chief Merchandising Officer since 1999 and was a Senior Vice President from 1999 to 2006.  Mr. Stark joined the Company in 1977.

Eugene A. Castagna has been Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since 2006.  Mr. Castagna served as Assistant Treasurer from 2002 to 2006 and as Vice President - Finance from 2000 to 2006.  Mr. Castagna is a certified public accountant and joined the Company in 1994.

Matthew Fiorilli has been Senior Vice President - Stores since 1999.  Mr. Fiorilli joined the Company in 1973.

Mr. Temares, Mr. Stark, Mr. Castagna and Mr. Fiorilli, together with the following officers who are not considered to be executive officers under the Exchange Act, comprise the Company’s Operating Team: Scott Hames, Vice President - Marketing and Analytics, Richard McMahon, Chief Strategy Officer and Vice President — Corporate Operations, Allan N. Rauch, Vice President — Legal and General Counsel, and G. William Waltzinger, Jr., Vice President — Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — Corporate Development and President — Harmon Stores, Inc.

12

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following is a discussion and analysis of our compensation programs as they apply to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company other than its principal executive officer and principal financial officer for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 (“named executive officers”) whose compensation information is presented in the Summary Compensation Table following this discussion and analysis.

Overview of Executive Compensation

As described below, the Company has experienced strong growth and financial stability in the 40 years of its existence and, in particular, in the 19 years since it became a public company.  The Company believes that a key factor in this performance has been the stability of its executive team.  Including Warren Eisenberg and Leonard Feinstein, the Company’s Co-Chairmen and Co-Founders, each of whom has served the Company’s business for 40 years, the Company’s executive officers have an average tenure with the Company of over 30 years.  The Company’s policy is to seek, at all levels, to promote from within.  Thus, the Company has been managed by a cohesive group of executives who have worked together for many years.

The Compensation Committee’s principal objective is to develop and implement compensation policies to retain this successful executive group, while at the same time aligning the executives’ compensation with the Company’s performance and enhancements to shareholder value.  The cash compensation levels for our named executive officers (our Co-Chairmen, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer) and the other executives whose compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee are within or below market range principally because the sole cash compensation is salary; the Company has no bonus program for these executives.  The Compensation Committee places greater emphasis on equity compensation, consisting of stock options and restricted stock.  Further, the Company’s equity compensation programs include substantial time vesting provisions which provide greater incentives for the executives to remain with the Company and to focus on the Company’s performance over an extended period.

Since the initial public offering of its common stock in 1992 through the end of fiscal 2010, the Company has experienced an average annual growth in revenues of 22.8%, net income of 24.2% and net earnings per diluted share of 24.4%.  As a result of this growth, the Company was added to the NASDAQ-100 Index in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996 and the S&P 500 Index in the third quarter of fiscal 1999.  The Company is listed as the 304th largest company in the United States as measured by revenue on the 2011 Fortune 500 annual ranking of America’s largest corporations.  Since the initial public offering of its common stock in 1992 through the end of fiscal 2010, the Company’s stock price has increased at an average annual rate of 23.6%.

For fiscal 2009, the Company reported net earnings of $2.30 per diluted share ($600.0 million), an increase of approximately 40% as compared with net earnings of $1.64 per diluted share ($425.1 million) for fiscal 2008.  In addition, for fiscal 2010, the Company reported net earnings of $3.07 per diluted share ($791.3 million), an increase of approximately 33% as compared with fiscal 2009.

Based on the recommendations and data from James F. Reda & Associates LLC (“JFR”), the independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee, and other factors, and in light of the Company’s strong financial results for fiscal 2009, the Compensation Committee determined that the named executive officers of the Company should receive the total compensation packages for fiscal 2010, as further described below.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Compensation Committee has developed and implemented compensation policies, plans and programs to provide competitive compensation opportunities to the executives whose compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee considers the total compensation package (earned or potentially available, including benefits) in establishing each element of compensation.

The policies, plans and programs are designed to meet the following objectives:

·                  Retain the executives who are part of the Company’s executive team and attract highly qualified executives when new executives are required

13

·                  Be competitive with other major U.S. peer retail companies

·                  Reward corporate and individual performance

·                  Align the interests of executives and shareholders

·                  Promote the balance of annual and long-term results

The Company believes that its compensation policies, plans and programs have no material adverse effect on the Company’s enterprise risk.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee provides overall guidance for the Company’s executive compensation policies and determines the amounts and elements of compensation for its named executive officers as well as for certain other key executives.  No executive is present during voting or deliberations with respect to matters relating to such executive’s compensation.  The Compensation Committee charter, which describes the Compensation Committee’s function, responsibilities and duties, is available on our website at www.bedbathandbeyond.com under the Investor Relations section.

The Compensation Committee consists of three members of our Board of Directors, all of whom are “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards and the applicable tax and securities rules and regulations.  The Compensation Committee members are Ms. Morrison and Messrs. Adler and Eppler.  The Compensation Committee meets on a regular basis for various reasons as outlined in its charter.

Use of Outside Advisors

In making its determinations with respect to executive compensation, the Compensation Committee has periodically engaged the services of compensation consultants.  The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain, terminate and set the terms of the Company’s relationship with any consultants and any other outside advisors who assist the Compensation Committee in carrying out its responsibilities.  In connection with making its determinations regarding compensation for our named executive officers and certain other key executives for fiscal 2008, the Compensation Committee conducted a search for an independent compensation consultant and retained JFR to conduct a compensation review for the named executive officers and certain other executives.  JFR had not previously worked with the Company in any capacity and has not served the Company in any capacity, except as consultants to the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee has continued to retain JFR for fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011.  The Compensation Committee also receives advice and assistance from the law firm of Chadbourne & Parke LLP, which has acted as counsel only to the Company’s independent directors and its Board committees.

Methodology

Under the direction of the Compensation Committee, the compensation review in each year included a peer group competitive market review and total compensation recommendations by JFR.

The methodology used by JFR included reviewing available data based on the Company’s industry, revenue size and financial performance, as well as data from companies from various industries with a chairman among its named executive officers who is also a founder in light of the fact that the Company’s Co-Chairmen are its Co-Founders.  The peer group developed by JFR, upon which it based its recommendations, consists of 18 companies that are the Company’s direct competitors, retailing companies of similar size or retailing companies with founders/chairmen positions.  This peer group consists of the following companies:

14

The peer group analyses prepared by JFR used public company proxy statements, third party industry compensation surveys and other publicly available information.

The Compensation Committee solicits input from the Co-Chairmen when considering decisions concerning the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and solicits input from the Co-Chairmen and the Chief Executive Officer when considering decisions concerning the compensation of the other named executive officers and any other executive whose compensation the Compensation Committee determines.  In connection with its determinations, in fiscal 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Compensation Committee consulted with the Co-Chairmen, who are the Co-Founders of the Company and who have been continuously involved in the affairs of the Company since its organization in 1971, with respect to the recommendations of JFR regarding the compensation package of the Chief Executive Officer.  The Compensation Committee also received and reviewed the recommendations of the Co-Chairmen and Chief Executive Officer regarding the salary and equity compensation awards for the other named executive officers and certain other executives for fiscal 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.  The compensation approved by the Compensation Committee for each of Messrs. Eisenberg, Feinstein and Temares for fiscal 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was determined by the Compensation Committee taking into account recommendations of and certain data received from JFR and, in the case of Mr. Temares, the recommendations of the Co-Chairmen.  The compensation approved by the Compensation Committee for the named executive officers, other than the Co-Chairmen and Mr. Temares, for fiscal 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was determined by the Compensation Committee, taking into account the recommendations of the Co-Chairmen, Chief Executive Officer and JFR and certain data the Compensation Committee requested from JFR.

In making its determinations for fiscal 2010, the Compensation Committee engaged JFR to conduct a compensation review for all executive officers, including the named executive officers and for certain other executives.  Under the direction of the Compensation Committee, JFR performed a compensation study that relied on the compensation analysis conducted in 2009, and included additional market data from surveys and proxies.  Their approach involved determining the median and 75th percentile market compensation by position.  JFR advised that in all cases the increased total direct (cash and non-cash) compensation for the named executive officers was below the 75th percentile of the peer group in calculations that also compared total compensation against such group’s latest reported fiscal year compensation.  Since the compensation for all of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2009 remained the same as the compensation for those executives for fiscal 2008 and since the Company achieved strong financial results in fiscal 2009, the Compensation Committee determined, early in fiscal 2010, that all of the executive officers of the Company, other than the Co-Chairmen, should receive increases in base salaries effective in May 2010.

Elements of Compensation

The Company seeks to provide total compensation packages to its associates, including its named executive officers, which implement its compensation philosophy.  The components of the Company’s compensation programs are base salary, equity compensation (consisting of stock options and restricted stock awards), retirement and other benefits (consisting of health plans, a limited 401(k) plan match and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan) and perquisites.  The Company places greater emphasis in the compensation packages for named executive officers on equity incentive compensation rather than cash compensation in order to align compensation more closely with performance results and the creation of shareholder value.  The Company does not have a cash bonus program for executive officers.

15

Base Salary

The Company pays base salaries to provide our named executive officers with current, regular compensation that is appropriate for their position, experience and responsibilities.  Changes in base salary, if any, are effective in May of each fiscal year.  The Company believes that cash compensation levels for our named executive officers are within or below market range as the Company places greater emphasis on equity compensation.

Equity Compensation

The Company’s overall approach to equity compensation is to make equity awards comprised of a combination of stock options and restricted stock to all executive officers, including the named executive officers, and a small number of other executives.  These grants are made on May 10 of each year (or the following trading day should such date fall on a weekend or holiday).  The vesting provisions relating to equity compensation have been and continue to be determined with the principal purpose of retaining the Company’s executives and key associates.  The Company believes its equity compensation policies have been highly successful in the long term retention of its executives and key associates, including its named executive officers.

Consistent with the Company’s historic practice, the stock options vest over time, subject, in general, to the named executive officers remaining in the Company’s employ on specified vesting dates.  Vesting of the restricted stock awarded to these named executive officers is dependent on (i) the Company’s achievement of a performance-based test for the fiscal year in which the grant is made, and (ii) assuming achievement of the performance-based test, time vesting, subject, in general, to the executive remaining in the Company’s employ on the specified vesting dates.

The performance-based test requires that the Company’s net income in the fiscal year exceed the Company’s net income in the prior fiscal year or that the Company’s net income as a percentage of sales place it in the top half of the companies in the S&P 500 Retailing Index with respect to such measurement.  Net income is adjusted for such purpose to reflect (i) mergers, acquisitions, consolidations or dispositions, (ii) changes in accounting methods, and (iii) extraordinary items, as defined in Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 225, “Income Statement”, or stock repurchase or dividend activity.  The Company believes that this performance-based test meets the standard for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), so that the restricted stock awards will be deductible compensation for certain executives if their annual compensation exceeds $1 million. The Compensation Committee believes that this test is an appropriate measure of performance for companies in the retail industry and, specifically, for companies in the Company’s sector.  In addition, even if the performance-based test is met, the executive must remain in the Company’s employ for an extended period in order to earn the restricted stock, further aligning the executive’s interest with the long-term interests of the Company.

For each of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the performance-based test was satisfied in that the Company’s net income exceeded the Company’s net income for the prior fiscal year.

All executives (other than named executive officers and other key executives whose compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee) and associates awarded incentive compensation receive grants consisting solely of restricted stock.  Vesting of restricted stock awarded to these associates is based solely on time-vesting with no performance-based test.

Prior to fiscal 2008, stock option awards were made by the Compensation Committee based on the number of shares covered by the options.  Beginning in fiscal 2008, based on advice from JFR, stock option awards have been made in dollars (with the number of shares covered by the options determined by dividing the dollar amount of the grant by the Stock Option Fair Value, as described below).  The Compensation Committee believes that making stock option awards in dollar amounts rather than share amounts is an increasingly prevalent practice and is advisable because making stock option awards in dollar amounts allows the Compensation Committee to align stock option awards with the value of the option grants.  Making stock option awards in dollars also enables the Compensation Committee to more readily evaluate appropriate aggregate compensation amounts and percentage increases or decreases for executives, in comparison to making stock option awards in share amounts (the value of which varies depending on the trading price of the Company’s stock and other factors).

In making the awards, the Compensation Committee considered the fair value of these options on the date of grant determined in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (the “Stock Option Fair Value”).

16

All awards of restricted stock and stock options are made under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan, approved by the Company’s shareholders (the performance goals under such plan having been re-approved in 2009), which is the only equity incentive plan under which the Company can currently make awards of equity compensation.

Senior Executive Compensation

In addition to considering the Company’s compensation policies generally, the Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation and concentrates on the compensation packages for the Company’s senior executive officers, namely, the Co-Chairmen (Warren Eisenberg and Leonard Feinstein, who are the Company’s Co-Founders) and the Chief Executive Officer (Steven H. Temares), believing that these three named executive officers are the most important and influential in determining the continued success of the Company.  The Company has enjoyed considerable success in the 19 years it has been a public company, and in both fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 achieved strong financial results.

In 2010, the employment agreements for the Co-Chairmen were amended to extend their terms until June 30, 2013.  At that time, the employment agreements for the Co-Chairmen were amended to eliminate the entitlement to receive excise tax gross-up payments due to change in control payments that would trigger an excise tax pursuant to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code.  Instead, the employment agreements were amended to provide that the change in control payments and benefits payable to each of the Co-Chairmen will be reduced if the reduction would result in a greater amount payable to each of the Co-Chairmen after taking into account the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code.  In connection with these amendments, the Company agreed that in the event of a change in control of the Company, the Company will fund a “rabbi trust” to hold an amount equal to the value of the payments and certain benefits payable to each of the Co-Chairmen upon his termination of employment with the Company.

For fiscal 2010, the base salaries for the Co-Chairmen remained at $1,100,000, the same as they were for the prior four fiscal years.  For fiscal 2010, the base salary for Mr. Temares increased by $1,000,000 to $2,500,000.  The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Temares’ base salary increase was warranted based on the Company’s strong financial performance and Mr. Temares’ strong individual performance.  According to the analysis prepared by JFR, Mr. Temares’ increased base salary for fiscal 2010 was below the median of the cash compensation of the 18-company peer group.

For fiscal 2010, the base salaries for each of Mr. Stark and Mr. Castagna increased by $200,000.  The Compensation Committee determined that these increases were warranted based on the Company’s growth and strong financial results in 2009.

For fiscal 2010, while authorizing increases in base salaries for all of the named executive officers other than the Co-Chairmen, the Compensation Committee determined that there would be no increase in aggregate equity compensation for the top three named executive officers, but that there would be a reallocation of equity compensation among such officers such that the total equity compensation of the Chief Executive Officer was increased in an amount equal to a reduction in total equity compensation of the Co-Chairmen.

The aggregate equity awards to Mr. Temares for fiscal 2010 increased from fiscal 2009 by $2,000,000 to $9,000,000, with the increase comprised of $1,000,000 in stock options and $1,000,000 in performance-based restricted stock.  Of the total of $9,000,000 of equity awards to Mr. Temares for fiscal 2010, $4,500,000 consisted of performance-based restricted stock (based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant) and $4,500,000 consisted of stock options (based on the Stock Option Fair Value).  The equity awards to Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein for fiscal 2010 decreased from fiscal 2009 by an aggregate of $2,000,000 from $3,000,000 to $2,000,000 for each such executive, comprised of $1,500,000 of performance-based restricted stock and $500,000 of stock options (valued on the same basis as Mr. Temares’ awards).

The aggregate equity awards to each of Mr. Stark and Mr. Castagna for fiscal 2010 increased from 2009 by $207,322, comprised of a decrease in stock options of $42,678 and an increase in performance-based restricted stock of $250,000.

In the view of the Compensation Committee, the base salary, stock option grants, and performance-based restricted stock awards constitute compensation packages for the Chief Executive Officer and for the Co-Chairmen, as well as the other named executive officers, which are appropriate for a company with the revenues and earnings of the Company.  The stock options granted to the Chief Executive Officer vest in five equal annual installments, while the stock options awarded to the Co-Chairmen vest in three equal annual installments, in each case commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date and based on continued service to the Company.  The restricted stock awards to each such executive are conditioned on the performance-based test described above with time vesting in five equal annual installments, in each case commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date and based on continued service to the Company.

17

For further discussion related to equity grants to the named executive officers, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Fiscal 2011 Compensation Developments

In early fiscal 2011, the Compensation Committee continued its engagement of JFR to conduct a compensation review for all executive officers, including the named executive officers and for certain other executives.  This review consisted of a peer group competitive market review using the same 18-company peer group data used for the prior year’s review.  JFR advised that an overall 15% increase in compensation for the Chief Executive Officer would result in his aggregate compensation package falling in the 81st percentile relative to chief executive officer compensation packages of peer group companies.  In light of the Company’s continued strong financial results for fiscal 2010, particularly in light of the Company’s ranking first among its peer group companies based upon net income as a percentage of sales, the Compensation Committee determined, early in fiscal 2011, that all of the executive officers of the Company, other than the Co-Chairmen, should receive increases in their total compensation packages for fiscal 2011.  The Compensation Committee determined that the total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer should increase 15%, and the total compensation of the Co-Chairmen should remain unchanged.

For fiscal 2011, the base salaries for the Co-Chairmen will remain at $1,100,000.  For fiscal 2011, the base salary for Mr. Temares will increase by $500,000 to $3,000,000.  According to the analysis prepared by JFR, Mr. Temares’ increased base salary for fiscal 2011 was below the median of the cash compensation of the 18-company peer group.

The aggregate equity awards to Mr. Temares for fiscal 2011 increased from fiscal 2010 by $1,225,000 to $10,225,000, with the increase comprised of $500,000 in stock options and $725,000 in performance-based restricted stock.  Of the total of $10,225,000 of equity awards to Mr. Temares for fiscal 2011, $5,225,000 consists of performance-based restricted stock (based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant) and $5,000,000 consists of stock options (based on the Stock Option Fair Value).  The equity awards to Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein for fiscal 2011 remained unchanged from fiscal 2010 at $2,000,000 for each such executive, comprised of $1,500,000 of performance-based restricted stock and $500,000 of stock options (valued on the same basis as Mr. Temares’ awards).

In addition to the foregoing with respect to Messrs. Eisenberg, Feinstein and Temares, the Compensation Committee has determined that there be an increase for fiscal 2011 in the base salaries and the total dollar value of equity awards for the other named executive officers, Mr. Stark and Mr. Castagna, as well as for the other executives whose compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee.

Other Benefits

The Company provides the named executive officers with the same benefits offered to all other associates.  The cost of these benefits constitutes a small percentage of each named executive officer’s total compensation.  Key benefits include paid vacation, premiums paid for long-term disability insurance, a matching contribution to the named executive officer’s 401(k) plan account, and the payment of a portion of the named executive officer’s premiums for healthcare and basic life insurance.

In August of 2010, the Compensation Committee determined to pay Mr. Stark $185,916 in connection with the resolution of certain state tax withholding issues, including professional fees incurred in connection with the resolution of these issues, for the years 2004-2006.

The Company has a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of certain highly compensated associates, including the named executive officers.  The plan provides that a certain percentage of an associate’s contributions may be matched by the Company, subject to certain limitations.  This matching contribution will vest over a specified period of time.  See the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table” below.

18

The Company provides the named executive officers with certain perquisites including tax preparation services and car service, in the case of Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein, and a car allowance, in the case of all named executive officers.  The Compensation Committee believes all such perquisites are reasonable and consistent with its overall objective of attracting and retaining our named executive officers.

See the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table for further information regarding these benefits and perquisites, and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for information regarding termination and change in control payments and benefits.

Impact of Accounting and Tax Considerations

The Compensation Committee considers the accounting cost associated with equity compensation and the impact of Section 162(m) of the Code, which generally prohibits any publicly held corporation from taking a federal income tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1 million in any taxable year to certain executives, subject to certain exceptions for performance-based compensation.  Stock options and performance-based compensation granted to our named executive officers are intended to satisfy the performance-based exception and be deductible.  Base salary amounts in excess of $1 million are not deductible by the Company.

Policy on the Recovery of Incentive Compensation

In fiscal 2009, the Board adopted a policy as part of the Company’s corporate governance guidelines on the recovery of incentive compensation, commonly referred to as a “clawback policy,” applicable to the Company’s named executive officers (as defined under Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K).  The Compensation Committee is monitoring the issuance of regulations under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to incentive compensation recoupment and will amend its policy to the extent necessary to comply with such Act.

Conclusion

After careful review and analysis, the Company believes that each element of compensation and the total compensation provided to each of its named executive officers is reasonable and appropriate.  The value of the compensation payable to the named executive officers is significantly tied to the Company’s performance and the return to its shareholders over time.  The Company believes that its compensation programs will allow it to retain the executives who are part of the Company’s executive team and attract highly qualified executives when new executives are required.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement.  Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010 for filing with the SEC.

The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who constitute the Compensation Committee:

19

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL 2010, FISCAL 2009 AND FISCAL 2008

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

20

21

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Employment Agreements

Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein

Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein have employment agreements with the Company which were amended as of August 13, 2010 to, among other things, extend their employment terms until June 30, 2013, or as further extended by mutual agreement.  These agreements provide for salaries at the rate of $800,000 per year which may be increased from time to time by the Company.  The current annual salary for each of Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein is $1,100,000.  Under these agreements, each of Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein may at any time elect senior status (i.e., to be continued to be employed to provide non-line executive consultative services) at an annual salary of the greater of $400,000 (increased for cost of living adjustments) or 50% of his average salary over the three-year period prior to such election for a period (the “Senior Status Period”) of up to ten years from the date of such election.  During the Senior Status Period, the executive must provide services at a level of at least 25% of the average level of services the executive performed for the prior 36 month period.  During the Senior Status Period, the Company is required to provide to the executive an office at a location specified by the executive, a secretary, car service and car allowance, all on a basis comparable to that which is currently provided to the executive.  The agreements contain non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions.  These provisions generally apply through the term of employment, including the Senior Status Period and any other time when salary payments are required to be made under the agreements.  The agreements provide, in addition, for some of Messrs. Eisenberg’s and Feinstein’s employee benefits to continue during their active employment, their Senior Status Period and during the period of supplemental pension payments.  For a complete description of payments due to Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein upon termination of their employment with the Company, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Messrs. Temares, Stark and Castagna

Messrs. Temares, Stark and Castagna have employment agreements with the Company which provide for severance pay and other benefits upon a termination of their employment.  For a complete description of payments due to Messrs. Temares, Stark and Castagna upon termination of their employment with the Company, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.  These agreements also provide for non-competition and non-solicitation of the Company’s employees during the term of employment and for one year thereafter (two years in the case of Mr. Castagna), and confidentiality during the term of employment and surviving the end of the term of employment.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The named executive officers’ employment agreements and certain of the plans in which the executives participate require the Company to pay compensation to the executives if their employment terminates.

The estimated amount of compensation payable to the named executive officers in each termination situation is listed in the table below.  The table is presented using an assumed termination date and an assumed change in control date of February 26, 2011, the last day of fiscal 2010 and a price per share of common stock of $47.85 (the “Per Share Closing Price”), the closing per share price as of February 25, 2011, the last business day of fiscal 2010.  Descriptions of the agreements under which such payments would be made follow:

Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein

Pursuant to their employment agreements, following the Senior Status Period, Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein are each entitled to supplemental pension payments of $200,000 per year (as adjusted for a cost of living increase) until the death of the survivor of him and his current spouse.  The agreements provide, in addition, for some of Messrs. Eisenberg’s and Feinstein’s employee benefits to continue during their Senior Status Period and during the period of supplemental pension payments or following a termination upon a change in control.

Under the agreements, if Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein are terminated without “cause” (as defined below) or if the executive is removed from or not reelected to any officer or director position prior to his Senior Status Period (or any officer position during his Senior Status Period), there is a material diminution in the executive’s salary, benefits or perquisites or, prior to his Senior Status Period, there is a material diminution in the executive’s duties or the Company’s principal office or the executive’s own office location as assigned to him by the Company is relocated and the executive elects to terminate his employment, the executive shall be paid through the end of the term of employment and the Senior Status Period.  Following a change in control of the Company (as defined in the agreements), each of the executives may, at his option, upon 90 days’ written notice, terminate employment and shall be paid an amount equal to three times salary then in effect, if the written notice is given before the Senior Status Period, or, if during the Senior Status Period, one half of Senior Status Salary for the number of years (including fractions), if any, remaining in the Senior Status Period, payable over such applicable period in accordance with normal payroll practices.  The agreements were amended effective as of August 13, 2010 to provide that in the event any amounts paid or provided to the executive in connection with a change in control are determined to constitute “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code which would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the payments and benefits due to the executive will be reduced if the reduction would result in a greater amount payable to the executive after taking into account the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.  The agreements also provide that upon a change in control of the Company, the Company will fund a “rabbi trust” for each of the executives to hold an amount equal to the value of the payments and certain benefits payable to each of the executives upon his termination of employment with the Company.  In the event of termination of employment, the executives are under no obligation to seek other employment and there is no reduction in the amount payable to the executive on account of any compensation earned from any subsequent employment.  In the event of termination due to death of either of the executives, the executive’s estate or beneficiary shall be entitled to his salary for a period of one year following his death and payment of expenses incurred by executive and not yet reimbursed at the time of death.  In the event of termination due to the inability to substantially perform his duties and responsibilities for a period of 180 consecutive days, the executive shall be entitled to his salary for a period of one year following the date of termination (less any amounts received under the Company’s benefit plans as a result of such disability).  To the extent that any payments under the employment agreements due following the termination of Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein are considered to be deferred compensation under Section 409A, such amounts will commence to be paid on the earlier of the six-month anniversary of termination of employment or the executive’s death.

22

Either of the executives may be terminated for “cause” upon written notice of the Company’s intention to terminate his employment for cause, such notice to state in detail the particular act or acts or failure or failures to act that constitute the grounds on which the proposed termination for cause is based.  The executives shall have ten days after such notice is given to cure such conduct, to the extent a cure is possible.  “Cause” means (i) the executive is convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude or (ii) the executive is guilty of willful gross neglect or willful gross misconduct in carrying out his duties under the agreement, resulting, in either case, in material economic harm to the Company, unless the executive believed in good faith that such act or non-act was in the best interests of the Company.  In addition, pursuant to their respective restricted stock agreements, shares of restricted stock granted to Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein will vest upon death, disability, termination of employment without “cause” or constructive termination, and for restricted stock awards granted since fiscal 2009, vesting upon termination without “cause” or constructive termination will be subject to attainment of performance goals.

In substitution for a split dollar insurance benefit previously provided to such executives, in fiscal 2003, the Company entered into deferred compensation agreements with Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein under which the Company is obligated to pay Messrs. Eisenberg and Feinstein $2,125,000 and $2,080,000, respectively, in each case payable only on the last day of the first full fiscal year of the Company in which the total compensation of Mr. Eisenberg or Feinstein, as applicable, will not result in the loss of a deduction for such payment pursuant to applicable federal income tax law.

Messrs. Temares, Stark and Castagna

The agreements with Messrs. Temares and Stark provide for severance pay equal to three years’ salary, and the agreement with Mr. Castagna provides for severance pay equal to one year’s salary, if the Company terminates their employment other than for “cause” (including by reason of death or disability) and one year’s severance pay if the executive voluntarily leaves the employ of the Company.  Severance pay will be paid in accordance with normal payroll, however any amount due prior to the six months after termination of employment will be paid in a lump sum on the date following the six month anniversary of termination of employment.  Any severance payable to these executives will be reduced by any monetary compensation earned by them as a result of their employment by another employer or otherwise.  Cause is defined in the agreements as when the executive has:  (i) acted in bad faith or with dishonesty; (ii) willfully failed to follow reasonable and lawful directions of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or the Board of Directors, as applicable, commensurate with his titles and duties; (iii) performed his duties with gross negligence; or (iv) been convicted of a felony.  Upon a termination of employment by the Company for any reason other than for “cause,” all unvested options will vest and become exercisable.  In addition, pursuant to their respective restricted stock agreements, shares of restricted stock granted to Messrs. Temares, Stark and Castagna will vest upon death, disability or termination of employment without “cause,” and for restricted stock awards granted since fiscal 2009, vesting upon termination without “cause” will be subject to attainment of performance goals.  These agreements also provide for non-competition and non-solicitation during the term of employment and for one year thereafter (two years in the case of Mr. Castagna), and confidentiality during the term of employment and surviving the end of the term of employment.

23

On November 16, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of the supplemental executive retirement benefit agreement, dated January 11, 2006, with Mr. Steven H. Temares, and a related escrow agreement, as described below.  Under the supplemental executive retirement benefit agreement, if he remains employed by the Company through June 12, 2012 (the twentieth anniversary of his employment with the Company) or the earlier occurrence of a change of control of the Company (as defined in the agreement), he is entitled to receive a supplemental retirement benefit on his retirement or other separation from service from the Company.  The retirement benefit will be payable in the form of a lump sum equal to the present value of an annual amount equal to 50% of Mr. Temares’ annual base salary on the date of termination of employment if such annual amount were paid for a period of 10 years in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices.  In the event Mr. Temares is terminated without cause or his employment is terminated due to death or disability prior to June 12, 2012, he will also be eligible to receive the supplemental retirement benefit.  Except in the case of Mr. Temares’ death (in which case the supplemental retirement benefit will be immediately payable) and the agreement as to escrow, the supplemental retirement benefit will be paid on the first business day following the six month anniversary of Mr. Temares’ termination and will be includible in his income for tax purposes at such time.

In the event Mr. Temares elects to retire or voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company after June 12, 2012, a portion of the supplemental retirement benefit, net of withholdings, will be deposited into an escrow account governed by a separate agreement.  No portion of the supplemental retirement benefit will be deposited into the escrow account, however, in the event Mr. Temares dies, is terminated by the Company without cause (as such term is defined in his employment agreement), terminates due to disability, or terminates employment within 12 months following a change of control.  In the event Mr. Temares elects to retire or voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company after June 12, 2012, 1/10 of the lump sum supplemental retirement benefit distribution (net of applicable withholding taxes) will be distributed to Mr. Temares; and 9/10 of the lump sum supplemental retirement benefit distribution (net of applicable withholding taxes) will be deposited into an escrow account to be distributed in nine equal annual installments on each of the following nine anniversaries of the deposit date, subject to acceleration in the case of Mr. Temares’ death or a change of control of the Company.  The entire escrow account will be distributed to Mr. Temares’ beneficiary no later than 30 days following his death or to Mr. Temares no later than 30 days following a change of control of the Company.  If Mr. Temares does not comply with the restrictive covenant not to compete with the Company (as described in his employment agreement, for the term of the escrow agreement) prior to the payment of the entire escrow amount, the Company will have the right to direct the escrow agent to pay the remaining escrow amount to the Company no later than 15 days after notice to the escrow agent and Mr. Temares will forfeit any and all rights to such remaining escrow amount.  Mr. Temares has agreed that in the event any amount in escrow is forfeited, he will use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain a refund of applicable taxes and remit such refund to the Company and the Company has agreed to reimburse Mr. Temares, or to pay on his behalf, reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with such a refund request.  Although the amended SERP provides that Mr. Temares will be protected from any impact resulting from the possible application of Section 409A to the terms of the SERP due to the complexities surrounding Section 409A, the Company believes that no such payment will be required.

Table and related footnotes follow on the next two pages.

24

25

26

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS

Grants of Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards for Fiscal 2010

The following table sets forth information with respect to stock options granted and restricted stock awarded during fiscal 2010 to each of the named executive officers under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2004 Plan”).  The Company did not grant any non-equity incentive plan awards in fiscal 2010.

Vesting of restricted stock awards depends on (i) the Company’s achievement of a performance-based test for the fiscal year of the grant, and (ii) assuming the performance-based test is met, time vesting, subject in general to the executive remaining in the Company’s employ on specific vesting dates.  The performance-based test for fiscal 2010 was met.  The performance test is designed to meet the standard for performance-based compensation under the Code, so that restricted stock awards will be deductible compensation for certain executives if their annual compensation exceeds $1,000,000.  The stock awards granted in fiscal 2010 to Messrs. Eisenberg, Feinstein and Temares time vest in five equal installments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date.  The stock awards granted in fiscal 2010 to Messrs. Stark and Castagna time vest in five equal installments starting on the third anniversary of the grant date.

Vesting of stock option awards depends on time vesting, subject in general to the executive remaining in the Company’s employ on specific vesting dates.  The options granted in fiscal 2010 to Messrs.  Eisenberg and Feinstein vest in three equal installments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date.  The options granted in fiscal 2010 to Messrs. Temares, Stark and Castagna vest in five equal installments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date.  At the time of grant or thereafter, option awards and underlying shares of common stock, are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except as the Compensation Committee may permit.

27

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

The following table sets forth information for each of the named executive officers with respect to the value of all unexercised options and unvested restricted stock awards as of February 26, 2011, the end of fiscal 2010.