UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

 

Filed by the Registrant  ý

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

 

Check the appropriate box:

o

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

o

Definitive Proxy Statement

ý

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

 



 

In its Proxy Statement circulated in connection with the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (the “Company”) to be held on Thursday, May 26, 2005, the Company has asked its shareholders to approve a proposed amendment to the Jones Lang LaSalle Stock Award and Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under that Plan by 3,000,000.

 

In connection with its solicitation of votes, the Company may be providing the attached presentation to shareholders as additional soliciting materials in support of its request.

 



GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


GRAPHIC

 

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

 


 

Searchable text section of graphics shown above

 



 

 

 

[LOGO]

 

Stock Award and Incentive Plan
2005

 

 



 

[LOGO]

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

 

 

 

 

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated has filed its Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  This presentation has also been filed with the SEC as supplemental proxy solicitation material and has been filed on Form 8-K pursuant to SEC Regulation FD.  Statements in this presentation regarding, among other things, future financial results and performance, achievements, plans, targets, projections and objectives may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance, achievements, plans and objectives of Jones Lang LaSalle to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and Jones Lang LaSalle makes no representations or guarantees thereof.  Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include those discussed under “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” and elsewhere in Jones Lang LaSalle’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Statements speak only as of the date of this presentation.  Jones Lang LaSalle expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in Jones Lang LaSalle’s expectations or results, or any change in events.  In addition, nothing herein may be construed or is intended as an offering of any security.

 

2



 

Our Request

 

          Jones Lang LaSalle is requesting shareholder approval of a new share authorization of 3 million additional shares for its Stock Award and Incentive Plan (SAIP)

 

          We believe our use of equity-based incentives has contributed to our financial success for shareholders and will continue to be important for motivating and rewarding key employees in the future

 

          We expect institutional investment advisors to recommend voting against the request as a result of our:

          3-year average burn rate

          current overhang

          classification with REITs

 

3



 

JLL Employee Equity Compensation Philosophy

 

          The JLL compensation system rewards:

          Profit performance

          New Business and Client development

          Client Satisfaction

 

          Our compensation system design includes salary, bonus, and stock-based programs.

          Differs from real estate industry practice, which generally uses commissions

          Stock-based programs align employee and shareholder interests while also fostering retention

          We believe our model provides stronger, long-term value proposition to shareholders, clients and employees

 

4



 

          Stock Ownership Program (SOP)

          Over 700 key employees annual cash bonuses are reduced by 10% to 20% to purchase restricted stock units (RSUs)

          Primary objectives — retention of key talent and alignment with firm goals

          50% of RSUs vest after 18 months and remainder after 30 months

          25% uplift of deferred amount in additional shares

 

          Use of stock options discontinued in 2003

 

5



 

SAIP Shareholder Benefits

 

          The SAIP has benefited our Shareholders:

          RSUs and SOP focus employees and directors on long-term Jones Lang LaSalle stock and financial performance

          SOP puts significant “skin in the game” for hundreds of key employees

          Balanced focus on annual vs. long-term performance results

          Low voluntary turnover

          Strong stock and financial performance

 

6



 

Share Usage

          Recent Share Usage

          In 2004, JLL granted 3.0% of common stock outstanding in RSUs, including SOP, to key employees and outside directors (“burn rate” trending down)

          1.8% represented SOP shares purchased with a portion of annual bonuses of key employees, including the associated 25% uplift

          1.2% represented grants of RSUs comparable to long-term incentives granted at other companies

 

Grants as a % of Common Stock Outstanding

 

[GRAPH]

 

7



 

Corporate Governance

          Strong corporate governance

          Proposal to shareholders to declassify Board of Directors in May 2005

          Independent Chairman of the Board

          Independent Compensation Committee members

          Thomas C. Theobald, Chairman

          Henri-Claude de Bettignies

          Sir Derek Higgs

          Sheila A. Penrose

          Only one of six members of the Board is an Executive officer

          Board recommends shareholder approval of the new share authorization for SAIP

 

8



 

Competitive Comparisons

 

          Following charts compare our equity usage with similarly-sized companies in multiple industries in which we compete

          Similarly-sized companies — revenues between 1/3 to 3 times Jones Lang LaSalle’s revenues

          Note: showing 2004 data for Jones Lang LaSalle and 2003 data for comparator companies (2004 not yet available)

          Comparison to REITs not appropriate

          Profit distribution through dividends instead of stock price appreciation

          Limited use of equity-based compensation

 

9



 

Equity Usage Comparisons – Multiple Industries

 

2003 Burn Rate (see notes)

 

[GRAPH]

 

Notes:

—  Burn rate  equity grants made during FY 2003  common stock outstanding

—  Jones Lang LaSalle numbers reflect FY 2004 data

 

10



 

Total Overhang (see Notes)

 

[GRAPH]

 

 

Notes:

—  Overhang  sum of stock options/SARs granted and outstanding  shares available for future grants  common stock outstanding

—  Jones Lang LaSalle overhang as of FY2004; other companies as of FY2003

 

11



 

Additional Considerations

 

          Jones Lang LaSalle considers RSUs used in SOP to be more akin to employee stock purchase plans

          Jones Lang LaSalle repurchases shares on the open market to minimize dilution impact of equity-based compensation

 

12