Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---

Form 10-Q

Commission File Number 001-32958

Crystal River Capital, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 549-8400

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        The number of outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of August 8, 2008 was 24,875,281.

---

Table of Contents

CRYSTAL RIVER CAPITAL, INC.

INDEX

---

Table of Contents

PART I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Financial Statements

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

4

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION

        References herein to "we," "us" or "our" refer to Crystal River Capital, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically requires otherwise.

        We are a Maryland corporation that was formed in January 2005 for the purpose of acquiring and originating a diversified portfolio of commercial and residential real estate assets and structured finance investments. We commenced operations on March 15, 2005, when we completed an offering of 17,400,000 shares of common stock (the "Private Offering"), and we completed our initial public offering of 7,500,000 shares of common stock (the "Public Offering") on August 2, 2006. We are externally managed and are advised by Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River Capital Advisors, LLC (the "Manager") as more fully explained in Note 14.

        We have elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code for the 2005 tax year. To maintain our tax status as a REIT, we plan to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income. In view of our election to be taxed as a REIT, we have tailored our balance sheet investment program to originate or acquire loans and investments to produce a portfolio that meets the asset and income tests necessary to maintain qualification as a REIT.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         Basis of Quarterly Presentation—The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10, Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and changes in cash flows have been made. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

         Principles of Consolidation—Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Crystal River Capital, Inc., three wholly-owned subsidiaries created in connection with our collateralized debt obligations and senior mortgage-backed notes, wholly-owned subsidiaries established for financing purposes, three wholly-owned subsidiaries established to own interests in real property and our domestic taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

         Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make a significant number of estimates in the preparation of the financial statements. These estimates include determining the fair market value of certain investments, debt obligations and derivative assets and liabilities, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment assumptions, allocation of purchase price to tangible and intangible assets or property acquisitions, and other items that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes

6

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

in these estimates (e.g., market values change due to changes in supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments, interest rates, or other reasons; yields change due to changes in credit outlook and loan prepayments) will occur in the near future. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from our estimates and differences may be material.

         Cash and Cash Equivalents—We classify highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase as cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents may include cash and short term investments. Short term investments are stated at cost, which approximates their fair value, and may consist of investments in money market accounts.

         Restricted Cash—Restricted cash consists primarily of funds held on deposit with brokers to serve as collateral for repurchase agreements, certain interest rate swap and credit default swap agreements, funds held by the trustee for CDO II (See Note 9) and funds held in escrow for one of our financing subsidiaries relating to a yield-maintenance agreement for certain real estate loans that we sold in June 2008 (See Note 10).

         Securities—We invest in commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"), U.S. Agency mortgage pass-through certificates, which are securities issued or guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") or Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae") and Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac backed by mortgage pass-through securities and evidenced by a series of bonds or certificates issued in multiple classes (collectively, "Agency MBS"), Non-Agency residential mortgage-backed securities ("Non-Agency RMBS") and other real estate debt and equity instruments. We account for our available for sale securities (CMBS, Agency MBS, RMBS, asset-backed securities ("ABS") and other real estate and equity instruments), which we refer to as our AFS investments, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("SFAS 115"). We classify our securities as available for sale because we may dispose of them prior to maturity in response to changes in the market, liquidity needs or other events, even though we do not hold the securities for the purpose of selling them in the near future.

        All investments classified as available for sale are reported at fair value, based on quoted market prices provided by independent pricing sources, when available, or from quotes provided by dealers who make markets in certain securities, or from our management's estimates in cases where the investments are illiquid. In making these estimates, our management utilizes pricing information obtained from dealers who make markets in these securities. However, under certain circumstances we may adjust these values based on our knowledge of the securities and the underlying collateral. Our management also uses a discounted cash flow model, which utilizes prepayment and loss assumptions based upon historical experience, economic factors and the characteristics of the underlying cash flow to substantiate the fair value of the securities. The assumed discount rate is based upon the yield of comparable securities. The determination of future cash flows and the appropriate discount rates are inherently subjective and, as a result, actual results may vary from our management's estimates.

7

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity.

        Periodically, all available for sale securities are evaluated for other than temporary impairment in accordance with SFAS 115 and Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets ("EITF 99-20"). An impairment that is an "other than temporary impairment" is a decline in the fair value of an investment below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate the decline will not be recovered over the remaining life of the investment. Other than temporary impairments result in reducing the carrying value of the security to its fair value through the statement of operations, which also creates a new carrying value for the investment. We compute a revised yield based on the future estimated cash flows as described in the section titled "Revenue Recognition" below. Significant judgments, including making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss assumptions and the changes in interest rates, are required in determining impairment.

         Real Estate Loans—Real estate loans are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, discounts, repayments, sales of partial interests in loans and unfunded commitments, unless the loan is deemed to be impaired. We account for our real estate loans in accordance with SFAS No. 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases ("SFAS 91").

        Real estate loans are evaluated for possible impairment on a periodic basis in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors For Impairment of a Loan—an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 5 and 15 ("SFAS 114"). Impairment occurs when we determine it is probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Upon determination of impairment, we establish a reserve for loan losses and recognize a corresponding charge to the statement of operations through a provision for loan losses. Significant judgments are required in determining impairment, including making assumptions regarding the value of the loan and the value of the real estate, partnership interest or other collateral that secures the loan, current economic conditions, the potential for natural disasters, loan portfolio composition, delinquency trends, credit losses to date on underlying loans and remaining credit protection. If the credit performance of our real estate loans is different than expected, we adjust the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management to provide for estimated losses inherent in the real estate loan portfolio. Once a loan is 90 days or more delinquent, or a borrower declares bankruptcy, we adjust the value of our accrued interest receivable to what we believe to be collectible and stop accruing interest on that loan.

         Real Estate Loans Held for Sale—Real estate loans that we have committed to sell or that we have the intent and ability to sell in the near future are classified as real estate loans held for sale. These real estate loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value on a loan-by-loan basis. Any market valuation adjustments on these loans are recognized in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities.

8

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

         Commercial Real Estate—Commercial properties held for investment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, upon acquisition, we allocate the purchase price to the components of the commercial properties acquired: the amount allocated to land is based on its estimated fair value; buildings and existing tenant improvements are recorded at depreciated replacement cost; above- and below-market in-place operating leases are determined based on the present value of the difference between the rents payable under the contractual terms of the leases and estimated market rents; lease origination costs for in-place operating leases are determined based on the estimated costs that would be incurred to put the existing leases in place under the same terms and conditions; and tenant relationships are measured based on the present value of the estimated avoided net costs if a tenant were to renew its lease at expiry, discounted by the probability of such renewal.

        Depreciation on buildings is provided on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the properties to a maximum of 40 years. Depreciation is determined with reference to each rental property's carried value, remaining estimated useful life and residual value. Acquired tenant improvements, above- and below-market in-place operating leases and lease origination costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining terms of the leases. The value associated with acquired tenant relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the relationships. All other tenant improvements and re-leasing costs are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases to which they relate. Depreciation on buildings and amortization of deferred leasing costs and tenant improvements that are determined to be assets of the company are recorded in depreciation and amortization expense. All above- and below-market tenant leases and tenant relationships are amortized to revenue. Above- and below-market ground leases are amortized to commercial real estate expenses.

        Properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. For commercial properties, an impairment loss is recognized when a property's carrying value exceeds its undiscounted future net cash flow. The impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Projections of future cash flow take into account the specific business plan for each property and management's best estimate of the most probable set of economic conditions anticipated to prevail in the market. We recorded no impairment losses on our commercial real estate investments during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or 2007.

         Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities—We account for our derivative and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS 133") and SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS 149"). SFAS 133 and SFAS 149 require us to recognize all derivative instruments at their fair value as either assets or liabilities on our balance sheet. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether we have designated it, and whether it qualifies, as part of a hedging relationship and on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a

9

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. We have no fair value hedges or hedges of a net investment in foreign operations as of June 30, 2008.

        For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that are attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (i.e., in "interest expense" when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with floating-rate debt). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative changes in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in current earnings during the period of change. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments (including foreign currency swaps and credit default swaps), the gain or loss is recognized in realized and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the current earnings during the period of change. Income and/or expense from interest rate swaps are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. We account for income and expense from interest rate swaps on an accrual basis over the period to which the payments and/or receipts relate.

         Dividends to Stockholders—We record dividends to stockholders on the declaration date. The actual dividend and its timing are at the discretion of our board of directors. We intend to pay sufficient dividends to avoid incurring any income or excise tax. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we declared dividends in the amount of $24,288, or $0.98 per share, of which $16,799 was distributed on April 29, 2008 to our stockholders of record as of March 31, 2008, $7,433 was distributed on July 28, 2008 to our stockholders of record as of June 30, 2008 and of which $56 related to dividends on deferred stock units.

         Offering Costs—Offering costs that were incurred in connection with the Private Offering and the Public Offering are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital. Certain offering costs that were incurred in connection with the Public Offering were initially capitalized to prepaid expenses and other assets and were recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital when we completed the Public Offering in August 2006.

         Trust Preferred Securities—Trusts that we form for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities are not consolidated in our financial statements in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 46R ("FIN 46R") as we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of such trusts. Our investment in the common securities of such trusts is included in other investments in our consolidated financial statements.

         Revenue Recognition—Interest income for our available for sale securities and real estate loans is recognized over the life of the investment using the effective interest method and recorded on the accrual basis. Interest income on mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") is recognized using the effective interest method as required by EITF 99-20. Real estate loans generally are originated or purchased at or near par value, and interest income is recognized based on the contractual terms of the loan

10

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

instruments. Any loan fees or acquisition costs on originated loans or securities are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the life of the investment utilizing the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. None of the interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 or 2007 included prepayment fees. We do not accrue interest on real estate loans that are placed on non-accrual status when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. As of January 1, 2008, one of our construction real estate loans was placed on non-accrual status and we recorded an additional provision for loan loss of $3,033 and $533 related to this loan during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the three months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as we believe that it is probable that we will not recover the entire loan balance, including the capitalized interest thereon.

        Under EITF 99-20, at the time of purchase, our management estimates the future expected cash flows and determines the effective interest rate based on these estimated cash flows and the purchase price. As needed, we update these estimated cash flows and compute a revised yield based on the current amortized cost of the investment. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties and contingencies, including the rate and timing of principal payments (including prepayments, repurchases, defaults and liquidations), the pass-through or coupon rate and interest rate fluctuations. In addition, interest payment shortfalls due to delinquencies on the underlying mortgage loans and the timing and the magnitude of credit losses on the mortgage loans underlying the securities have to be judgmentally estimated. These uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may impact our management's estimates and our interest income.

        We record security transactions, other than repurchases of our own stock, on the trade date. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based upon the specific identification method and recorded as gain (loss) on sale of available for sale securities in the statements of operations.

        We account for accretion of discounts or premiums on available for sale securities and real estate loans using the effective interest yield method. Such amounts have been included as a component of interest income in the statements of operations.

        We may sell all or a portion of our real estate investments to a third party. To the extent the fair value received for an investment differs from the amortized cost of that investment and control of the asset that is sold is surrendered making it a "true sale," as defined under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 ("SFAS 140"), a gain or loss on the sale will be recorded in the statements of operations as realized net gain (loss) on sale of real estate investment. To the extent a real estate investment is sold that has any fees that were capitalized at the time the investment was made and were being recognized over the term of the investment, the unamortized fees are recognized at the time of sale and included in any gain or loss on sale of real estate investments.

        We have retained substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of our rental properties and therefore we account for leases with our tenants as operating leases. The total amount of contractual rent that we receive from operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the

11

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

term of the lease; and a straight-line or free rent receivable, as applicable, is recorded for the difference between the rental revenue recorded and the contractual amount received. In addition to base rent, the tenants in our commercial real estate properties also pay substantially all operating costs.

        Expense reimbursement income arising from tenant leases that provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses and real estate expenses of the respective property is accrued in the same period as the related expenses are incurred. These recoverable expenses are included in expenses as commercial real estate expenses.

        Income arising from the operation of our parking garages is recognized when the parking spaces are occupied. Expenses related to the operation of the parking garage are included in expenses as commercial real estate expenses.

        Dividend income on preferred stock is recorded on the dividend declaration date.

         Interest in Equity Investment—We accounted for our investment in BREF One, LLC, a real estate finance fund, under the equity method of accounting since we owned more than a minor interest in the fund, but did not unilaterally control the fund and were not considered to be the primary beneficiary under FIN 46R. The investment was recorded initially at cost, and subsequently adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions to reflect the investment at its book value assuming hypothetical liquidation. In March 2008, we sold our investment in BREF One, LLC to an affiliate of our Manager, as more fully explained in Note 7.

         Income Taxes—We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding provisions of state law. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to stockholders within the statutory timeframe. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to federal or state income tax to the extent that we make qualifying distributions to our stockholders and provided we satisfy the REIT requirements, including certain asset, income, distribution and stock ownership tests. If we were to fail to meet these requirements, we would be subject to federal, state and local income taxes, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

        The dividends paid deduction of a REIT for qualifying dividends to our stockholders is computed using our taxable income as opposed to using our financial statement net income. Some of the significant differences between financial statement net income and taxable income include the timing of recording unrealized gains/realized gains associated with certain assets, the book/tax basis of assets, interest income, impairment, straight-line amortization of rental leases, credit loss recognition related to certain assets (asset-backed mortgages), accounting for derivative instruments and stock compensation and amortization of various costs (including start up costs).

        SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS 109"), establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effect of income taxes that result from an organization's activities during the current and preceding years. SFAS 109 requires that income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for book and tax purposes. A deferred tax asset or liability for each temporary difference is determined based

12

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

upon the tax rates that the organization expects to be in effect when the underlying items of income and expense are realized. A deferred tax valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

        The differences between GAAP net income and taxable income are generally attributable to differing treatment, including timing related thereto, of unrealized/realized gains and losses associated with certain assets, the bases, income, impairment, and/or credit loss recognition related to certain assets, primarily CMBS, accounting for derivative instruments, accounting for lease income on net leased real estate assets, and amortization or various costs. The distinction between GAAP net income and taxable income is important to our stockholders because dividends or distributions, if any, are declared and paid on the basis of annual estimates of taxable income or loss, We do not pay Federal income taxes on income that we distribute on a current basis, provided that we satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. We calculate our taxable income or loss as if we were a regular domestic corporation. This taxable income or loss level determines the amount of dividends, if any, that we are required to distribute over time to reduce or eliminate our tax liability pursuant to REIT requirements.

        Income on CMBS investments is computed for GAAP purposes based upon a yield, which assumes credit losses will occur (See "Revenue Recognition" for further discussion). The yield to compute our taxable income does not assume there would be credit losses, as a loss can only be deducted for tax purposes when it has occurred. Furthermore, due diligence expense incurred related to the acquisition of CMBS and loan investments not originated are required to be expensed as incurred for GAAP purposes but are included as a component of the cost basis of the asset and amortized for tax purposes. In addition, straight line rental income recognized for GAAP purposes is not recognized for tax purposes as taxable income is generally based on contractual rental income.

        We have a wholly-owned domestic taxable REIT subsidiary that has made a joint election with us to be treated as our TRS. Our TRS is a separate entity subject to federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, we recorded current net income tax expense of $0 and $345 (federal income tax of $240 and state and local income tax of $105), respectively, which is included in other expenses, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, we recorded current net income tax expense of $0 and $684 (federal income tax of $455 and state and local income tax of $229), respectively, which is included in other expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, we recorded a net deferred tax benefit (expense) of $0 and $150, respectively, which is included in other expenses, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, we recorded a net deferred tax benefit (expense) of $0 and $900, respectively, which is included in other expenses.

        As of June 30, 2008, we recorded a $14,870 valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $14,870 attributable to income tax net operating loss carryforward and capital loss carryforward relating to our TRS. The valuation allowance is based on management's estimate that our TRS is not expected to generate sufficient taxable income to recover the deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2008 we did not have a deferred tax liability. As of June 30, 2008, we had net operating loss carryforward and capital

13

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

loss carryforward of approximately $67 and $32,614, respectively. The net operating loss carryforward expires in 2027 and the capital loss carryforward expires in 2012.

        In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes ("FIN 48"). This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This interpretation was effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not materially affect our consolidated financial statements.

        Our policy for interest and penalties on material uncertain tax positions recognized in our consolidated financial statements is to classify these as interest expense and operating expense, respectively. However, in accordance with FIN 48 we assessed our tax positions for all open tax years (Federal, years 2005 through 2007 and State, years 2005 through 2007) as of June 30, 2008 and concluded that we have no material FIN 48 liabilities to be recognized at this time.

         Deferred Financing Costs—Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other third party costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing that result in a closing of such financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective agreements using the effective interest method or a method that approximates the effective interest method and the amortization is reflected in interest expense. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.

         Earnings per Share—We compute basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share ("SFAS 128"). Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed based on net income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and other participating securities outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is based on net income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus any additional shares of common stock attributable to stock options, provided that the options have a dilutive effect. At each of June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, options to purchase a total of 130,000 shares of common stock have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as they were determined to be antidilutive.

         Variable Interest Entities—In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of ARB No. 51 ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 provides guidance on identifying entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights and on determining when and which business enterprise should consolidate a variable interest entity ("VIE") when such enterprise would be determined to be the primary beneficiary. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision of

14

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

FIN 46, Interpretation No. 46R ("FIN 46R"), to clarify the provisions of FIN 46. FIN 46R states that a VIE is subject to consolidation if the investors in the entity being evaluated under FIN 46R either do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, are unable to direct the entity's activities, or are not exposed to the entity's losses or entitled to its residual returns. VIEs within the scope of FIN 46R are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to be the party that absorbs a majority of the VIE's expected losses, receives the majority of the VIE's expected returns, or both.

        Our ownership of the subordinated classes of CMBS and RMBS from a single issuer may provide us with the right to control the foreclosure/workout process on the underlying loans, which we refer to as the Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS. There are certain exceptions to the scope of FIN 46R, one of which provides that an investor that holds a variable interest in a qualifying special-purpose entity ("QSPE") is not required to consolidate that entity unless the investor has the unilateral ability to cause the entity to liquidate. SFAS 140 sets forth the requirements for an entity to qualify as a QSPE. To maintain the QSPE exception, the special-purpose entity must initially meet the QSPE criteria and must continue to satisfy such criteria in subsequent periods. A special-purpose entity's QSPE status can be impacted in future periods by activities undertaken by its transferor(s) or other involved parties, including the manner in which certain servicing activities are performed. To the extent that our CMBS or RMBS investments were issued by a special-purpose entity that meets the QSPE requirements, we record those investments at the purchase price paid. To the extent the underlying special-purpose entities do not satisfy the QSPE requirements, we follow the guidance set forth in FIN 46R as the special purpose entities would be determined to be VIEs.

        We have analyzed the pooling and servicing agreements governing each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments for which we own a greater than 50% interest in the subordinated class and we believe that the terms of those agreements are industry standard and are consistent with the QSPE criteria. However, there is uncertainty with respect to QSPE treatment for those special-purpose entities due to ongoing review by regulators and accounting standard setters (including the project of the FASB to amend SFAS 140 and the recently added FASB project on servicer discretion in a QSPE), potential actions by various parties involved with the QSPE (discussed in the paragraph above) and varying and evolving interpretations of the QSPE criteria under SFAS 140. We also have evaluated each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments as if the special-purpose entities that issued such securities are not QSPEs. Using the fair value approach to calculate expected losses or residual returns, we have concluded that we would not be the primary beneficiary of any of the underlying special-purpose entities. Additionally, the standard setters continue to review the FIN 46R provisions related to the computations used to determine the primary beneficiary of VIEs.

        Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our investment in these QSPEs totaled $76,982 as of June 30, 2008.

        The financing structures that we offer to the borrowers on certain of our real estate loans involve the creation of entities that could be deemed VIEs and therefore, could be subject to FIN 46R. Our management has evaluated our real estate loans and has concluded that none of the real estate loans are VIEs that are subject to the consolidation rules of FIN 46R. See Note 5.

15

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

         Stock Based Compensation—We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation ("SFAS 123R"), which establishes accounting and disclosure requirements using fair value based methods of accounting for stock-based compensation plans. Compensation expense related to grants of stock and stock options are recognized ratably over the vesting period of such grants based on the estimated fair value on the grant date.

        Stock compensation awards granted to the Manager and certain employees of the Manager's affiliates are accounted for in accordance with EITF 96-18, Accounting For Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and Services, which requires us to measure the fair value of the equity instrument using the stock prices and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either the date at which a performance commitment by the counterparty is reached or the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.

         Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties—A significant portion of our investments are concentrated in MBS that pass through collections of principal and interest from the underlying mortgages and there is a risk that some borrowers on the underlying mortgages will default. Therefore, MBS may bear some exposure to credit losses. Our maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk if all parties to our AFS investments failed completely to perform according to the terms of the contracts as of June 30, 2008 is $295,836. Our real estate loans and other investments may bear some exposure to credit losses. Our maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk if parties to the real estate loans, including real estate loans held for sale, and other investments failed completely to perform according to the terms of the loans and other agreements as of June 30, 2008 is $73,424.

        We bear certain other risks typical in investing in a portfolio of MBS. Principal risks potentially affecting our financial position, income and cash flows include the risk that (i) interest rate changes can negatively affect the market values of our MBS, (ii) interest rate changes can influence decisions made by borrowers in the mortgages underlying the securities to prepay those mortgages, which can negatively affect both the cash flows from, and the market value of, our MBS and (iii) adverse changes in the market value of our MBS and/or our inability to renew short term borrowings would result in the need to sell securities at inopportune times and cause us to realize losses.

        Other financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and real estate loans. We place our cash and cash equivalents in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. The collateral securing our real estate loans and other investments are located in the United States.

        Credit risk also arises from the possibility that tenants may be unable to fulfill their lease commitments. We have a significant concentration of rental revenue from our commercial properties given that JPMorgan Chase is the sole tenant of all three properties. Therefore, we are subject to concentration of credit risk, and the inability of this tenant to make its lease payments could have an adverse effect on us. Our exposure to this credit risk is mitigated since we have long-term leases in place for all three properties with a tenant that has an investment grade credit rating.

16

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

         Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)—Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Our other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised primarily of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and net unrealized and deferred gains and losses on certain derivative investments accounted for as cash flow hedges.

         Repurchase Agreements—In repurchase agreements, we transfer securities to a counterparty under an agreement to repurchase the same securities at a fixed price in the future. These agreements are accounted for as secured financing transactions as we maintain effective control over the transferred securities and the transfer meets the other criteria for such accounting. The transferred securities are pledged by us as collateral to the counterparty.

         Foreign Currency Transactions—We conform to the requirements of SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation ("SFAS 52"). SFAS 52 requires us to record realized and unrealized gains and losses from transactions denominated in a currency other than our functional currency (U.S. dollar) in determining net income.

         Segment Reporting—SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information ("SFAS 131"), establishes standards on reporting operating segments in interim and annual financial reports. SFAS 131 defines an operating segment as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. We have identified our chief operating decision-maker as our chief executive officer. We have determined that we operate in two reportable segments: a Securities, Loans and Other Investments segment and a Commercial Real Estate segment. The reportable segments were determined based on the allocation of our investment portfolio between investment activity and commercial real estate operations in which separate performance data is produced and analyzed by management and the chief operating decision-maker.

         Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements—In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires expanded financial statement disclosures about fair value measurements for assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 requires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy as defined in the standard. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007.

        SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:

        Basis of Fair Value Measurement

Level

1   Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

17

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Level

2   Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and



Level

3   Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

        A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. See Note 3 for further details of our adoption of SFAS 157.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 gives us the option of electing to measure eligible financial assets, financial liabilities and commitments at fair value (i.e., the fair value option, or FVO), on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The election to use the FVO is available when we first recognize a financial asset or financial liability or enter into a firm commitment. Subsequent changes in the fair value of assets, liabilities and commitments valued under the FVO will be recorded in our consolidated statements of operations.

        On January 1, 2008, we elected to apply the FVO under SFAS 159 to the available for sale assets and collateralized debt obligation liabilities of our consolidated collateralized debt obligation ("CDO") securitization entities. Prior to the application of SFAS 159, we were required, for financial reporting purposes, to carry at fair value the available for sale securities, but not the collateralized debt obligations, of the CDO entities, even though the available for sale securities and collateralized debt obligations were paired within the same legal structure and the collateralized debt obligations issued by each CDO entity would be repaid directly and solely from the cash flows generated by the assets of those entities.

        Electing the FVO for the available for sale securities and collateralized debt obligations (including derivatives) for our CDO entities will enable us to reduce the volatility in earnings and book value that results from the use of different measurement attributes, to correlate more closely the values of the assets and liabilities that are paired within the same securitization entity, and to reduce the complexity of accounting, especially with regards to derivatives under SFAS 133.

        We did not elect the fair value option for any of the assets or liabilities for any other legal entities as these are currently accounted for using similar measurement attributes and, as a result, there is less need to reduce volatility in earnings or the assets serving for any related liabilities are recorded in a manner that is similar to the reporting purposes of the secured liabilities. We also did not elect the fair value option for our investments that are funded with equity. There is no paired liability for these assets and our intent upon the acquisition of these assets is to hold them for investment and generate long-term cash flows. Thus, reflecting changes in fair values of these investments from period to period through our consolidated statements of operations, as would be required under the FVO of SFAS 159, would not, in our opinion, be appropriate.

        SFAS 159 allows for a one-time election to record the cumulative unrealized gains and losses on those assets, liabilities and commitments for which the FVO is elected and were existing at the time of initial application of SFAS 159. Adjustments resulting from the one-time election are reflected on our

18

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity and have no impact on our consolidated statements of operations. Subsequent changes in fair value will be recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. On January 1, 2008, as a result of the one-time election, we reclassified all unrealized gains on our available for sale securities that served as collateral for our CDOs to declared dividends in excess of earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss. On that date, we also recorded to declared dividends in excess of earnings the difference between the reported carrying value and fair value of our collateralized debt obligations. As a result of the adoption of SFAS 159 and this one-time election, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $181,092 as an increase to stockholders' equity as of January 1, 2008. There was no deferred tax impact of this increase since the net unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income that were reclassified to retained earnings were generated at the REIT, which distributes substantially all of its taxable income each year.

        In addition, we had $290,880 of notional interest rate swaps relating to our CDOs that were included in our derivative liabilities and had a fair value of $10,687 at January 1, 2008 that no longer qualify for hedge accounting at the date of adoption as a result of our FVO election. Subsequent changes in fair value of these interest rate swaps and net cash settlements prospectively will be recorded in our consolidated statements of operations.

        The following is a summary of the one-time cumulative effect adjustment on our consolidated statements of changes in stockholder's equity:

         Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted—In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and Accounting for Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies ("SOP 07-1"). This SOP provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies (the "Guide"). Entities that are within the scope of the Guide are required, among other things, to carry their investments at fair value, with changes in fair value included in earnings. The effective date of SOP 07-1 has been indefinitely deferred. We are currently evaluating this new guidance and have not determined whether we will be required to apply the provisions of the Guide in presenting our consolidated financial statements if and when such deferral ends.

19

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)"), which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and requires a company to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity to be measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. SFAS 141(R) also requires acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred and does not permit certain restructuring activities previously allowed under EITF Issue No. 95-3 to be recorded as a component of purchase accounting. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect the adoption of SFAS 141(R) may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 ("SFAS 160"). SFAS 160 clarifies the classification of non-controlling interests in consolidated statements of financial position and the accounting for and reporting of transactions between a company and holders of such non-controlling interests. Under SFAS 160, non-controlling interests are considered equity and should be reported as an element of consolidated equity. The current practice of classifying minority interests within a mezzanine section of the statement of financial position will be eliminated. Under SFAS 160, net income will encompass the total income of all consolidated subsidiaries and will require separate disclosure on the face of the statements of operations of income (loss) attributable to the controlling and non-controlling interests. Increases and decreases in the non-controlling ownership interest amount will be accounted for as equity transactions. When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained, non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary must be measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and earlier application is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effect the adoption of SFAS 160 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 ("FSP 157-2"), which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. These non-financial items include assets and liabilities such as non-financial assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination, reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and asset retirement obligations initially measured at fair value. We are currently evaluating the impact that adopting FSP 157-2 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In February 2008, the FASB amended SFAS 140 through its issuance of FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions ("FSP 140-3"), relating to repurchase financings for financial assets previously transferred between the same counterparties, that are entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the initial transfer. FSP 140-3 establishes criteria to determine the accounting treatment of transactions involving the transfer, and subsequent repurchase financing, of financial assets with the same counterparty. Transactions that do not meet the criteria of FSP 140-3 do not qualify for QSPE accounting treatment under SFAS 140 and will be treated as derivatives requiring further evaluation under SFAS 133. FSP

20

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

140-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that FSP 140-3 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand how and why an entity uses derivative instruments and the instruments' effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early application encouraged. We are currently evaluating the impact that adopting SFAS 161 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"), which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method in accordance with FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and earlier application is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effect that FSP EITF 03-6-1 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

         Presentation—Certain reclassifications have been made in the presentation of the prior periods consolidated financial statements to conform to the June 2008 presentation.

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

        The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under SFAS 155 and SFAS 159 as of June 30, 2008. As required by SFAS 157, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

21

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

        The following is a summary of our available for sale securities based on the lowest level input that is significant to each security's fair value measurement in its entirety as of June 30, 2008.

---

(1)

Consists of Level 3 assets that are financed by our collateralized debt obligations. We own an interest in these securities through our investment in the subordinate classes of notes issued by these CDOs.

22

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

Level 3 Gains and Losses

        The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our assets with significant valuation inputs classified as Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis reflected as Level 3 decreased, largely as a result of the sale of a CMBS totaling $2,245, principal repayments on CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS totaling $6,934 and spread widening on our CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS. A significant amount of our available for sale securities are reflected as Level 3 as a result of the reduction of liquidity in the capital markets that has resulted in a decrease in the observability of the significant inputs used in determining fair value.

23

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

        The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our assets with significant valuation inputs classified as Level 3 for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2008, our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis reflected as Level 3 decreased, largely as a result of principal repayments on CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS totaling $3,775 and spread widening on our CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS. A significant amount of our available for sale securities are reflected as Level 3 as a result of the reduction of liquidity in the capital markets that has resulted in a decrease in the observability of the significant inputs used in determining fair value.

24

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

        The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our liabilities with significant valuation inputs classified as Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis increased, largely due to our classifying our CDS as Level 3 liabilities as a result of the reduction of liquidity in the capital markets that has resulted in a decrease in the observability of the significant inputs used in determining fair value, offset in part by derivative liabilities that we closed out during the six month period.

25

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

        The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our liabilities with significant valuation inputs classified as Level 3 for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2008, our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis increased, largely due to our classifying our CDS as Level 3 liabilities as a result of the reduction of liquidity in the capital markets that has resulted in a decrease in the observability of the significant inputs used in determining fair value.

26

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

        The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our available for sale securities with significant valuation inputs classified as Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

27

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

        The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our available for sale securities with significant valuation inputs classified as Level 3 for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Valuation Techniques

        In accordance with SFAS 157, valuation techniques used for assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value are generally categorized into three types:

Market Approach—Market approach valuation techniques use prices and other relevant information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include comparables and matrix pricing. Comparables use market multiples, which might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable. The selection of where within the range the appropriate multiple falls requires judgment, considering both quantitative and qualitative factors specific to the measurement. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying

28

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities.

Income Approach—Income approach valuation techniques convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount, or a discounted amount. These techniques rely on current market expectations of future amounts.

Cost Approach—Cost approach valuation techniques are based upon the amount that, at present, would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset, or the current replacement cost. That is, from the perspective of a market participant (seller), the price that would be received for the asset is determined based on the cost to a market participant (buyer) to acquire or construct a substitute asset of comparable utility.

        The three approaches described within SFAS 157 are consistent with generally accepted valuation methodologies. While all three approaches are not applicable to all assets or liabilities accounted for at fair value, where appropriate and possible, one or more valuation techniques may be used. The selection of the valuation method(s) to apply considers the definition of an exit price and the nature of the asset or liability being valued and significant expertise and judgment is required. For assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value, excluding real estate held for sale, valuation techniques generally are a combination of the market and income approaches. Real estate held for sale valuation techniques generally combine income and cost approaches. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the application of valuation techniques applied to similar assets and liabilities has been consistent.

Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

        Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are not included in the tables above. These assets include real estate loans and real estate loans held for sale that are reported at lower of cost or market and loans held for sale that initially were measured at cost and have been written down to fair value as a result of being designated for sale. The following table shows the hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2008.

        Real estate loans—We had one real estate construction loan that is held for investment where an allowance for loan losses has been calculated based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral and by using a fundamental cash flow valuation analysis. The cash flow analysis includes cumulative loss

29

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

assumptions derived from multiple inputs including estimates to complete the project, housing prices and other market data.

        Real estate loans held for sale—We designated two whole loans as being held for sale as of June 30, 2008 as we sold them in early July 2008. The fair value of the two whole loans held for sale was based on the actual sale price in July 2008. In addition, we designated two mezzanine loans as held for sale as we have committed to sell them, or we have the intent and ability to sell them in the near future. The fair value of the two mezzanine loans held for sale was based on management's discounted cash flow analysis that utilized spreads supplied by dealers.

Fair Value Option

        The following reflects the assets and liabilities accounted for under the fair value option and the change in fair value recorded in our consolidated statement of operations:

---

(1)

Represents accretion of net discount only.

30

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY (Continued)

---

(1)

Represents accretion of net discount only.

        Total financial assets at fair value classified within Level 3 were $349,680 and $577,834 as of June 30, 2008 and January 1, 2008, respectively. Such amounts represent 47% and 23% of "Total assets" on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 and January 1, 2008, respectively. Excluding assets for which we do not bear economic exposure, Level 3 assets were 12% and 7% of "Total assets" as of June 30, 2008 and January 1, 2008, respectively.

        Total financial liabilities at fair value classified within Level 3 were $223,580 and $299,034 as of June 30, 2008 and January 1, 2008, respectively. Such amounts represent 33% and 13% of "Total liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and January 1, 2008, respectively.

        As of June 30, 2008, our CDO notes had a face value of $484,198 and fair value of $204,769.

31

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

4. AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES

        Our available for sale securities are carried at their estimated fair values. The amortized cost and estimated fair values of our available for sale securities as of June 30, 2008 are summarized as follows:

        We pledge our available for sale securities to secure our repurchase agreements, collateralized debt obligations and borrowings under our secured revolving credit facility. The fair value of the available for sale securities that we pledged as collateral as of June 30, 2008 is summarized as follows:

        The aggregate estimated fair values, by underlying credit rating, of our available for sale securities as of June 30, 2008 was as follows:

32

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

4. AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES (Continued)

        The face amount and net unearned discount on our investments as of June 30, 2008 was as follows:

        For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and the three months ended June 30, 2007, net discount on available for sale securities accreted into interest income totaled $4,576 and $4,729, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2007, net discount on available for sale securities accreted into interest income totaled $12,244 and $7,930, respectively.

        Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities ("CMBS")—Our investments include CMBS, which are mortgage backed securities that are secured by, or evidence ownership interests in, a single commercial mortgage loan, or a partial or entire pool of mortgage loans secured by commercial properties. The securities may be senior, subordinated, investment grade or non-investment grade.

        The following is a summary of our CMBS investments as of June 30, 2008:

---

(1)

Market yield is calculated on a non-loss adjusted basis (i.e., not taking into account assumed defaults).

        Residential Mortgage Backed Securities ("RMBS")—Our investments include RMBS, which are securities that represent participations in, and are secured by or payable from, mortgage loans secured

33

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

4. AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES (Continued)

by residential properties. Our RMBS investments include Non-Agency pass-through certificates which are rated classes in senior/ subordinated structures ("Non-Agency RMBS").

        The following is a summary of our Non-Agency RMBS investments as of June 30, 2008:

---

(1)

Market yield is calculated on a non-loss adjusted basis (i.e., not taking into account assumed defaults).

        Other Securities—We invested in the preferred stock of Millerton I CDO with an estimated fair value of $24 as of June 30, 2008, and the preferred stock of Millerton II CDO with an estimated fair value of less than $1 as of June 30, 2008. The preferred stock of Millerton I CDO was rated C and the preferred stock of Millerton II CDO was not rated at June 30, 2008.

        Unrealized Losses—We did not own any available for sale securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2008.

        Other Than Temporary Impairments—For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded an impairment charge totaling $18,310 on 73 RMBS, 31 CMBS and two preferred stock investments, which was reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The impairment of 63 of the 73 RMBS and 23 of the 31 CMBS, totaling $9,663 and $5,523, respectively, is attributed to the decline in the projected yields related to changes in the cash flow assumptions, such as timing and prepayments, on the underlying assets. The impairment of the remaining ten of the 73 RMBS, eight of the 31 CMBS and both of the preferred stock investments, totaling $1,718, $1,285 and $121, respectively, is attributed to other than temporary declines in market values and is primarily a consequence of wider spreads affecting market values of the securities.

        For the three months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded an impairment charge totaling $22,058 on 15 RMBS and 45 Agency MBS, which was reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The

34

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

4. AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES (Continued)

impairment of six of the 15 RMBS, totaling $7,088, is attributed to the decline in the projected yields related to changes in the cash flow assumptions, such as timing and prepayments, on the underlying assets. The impairment of the remaining nine of the 15 RMBS, totaling $5,642, is attributed to other than temporary declines in market values and is primarily a consequence of wider spreads affecting market values of the securities. The impairment of the 45 Agency MBS, totaling $9,328, is a result of management's intent not to hold these securities (where cost exceeds market value) to recovery.

        For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded an impairment charge totaling $85,464 on 117 RMBS, 72 CMBS and two preferred stock investments, which was reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The impairment of 80 of the 117 RMBS and 24 of the 72 CMBS, totaling $31,993 and $6,271, respectively, is attributed to the decline in the projected yields related to changes in the cash flow assumptions, such as timing and prepayments, on the underlying assets. The impairment of the remaining 37 of the 117 RMBS, 48 of the 72 CMBS and both of the preferred stock investments, totaling $13,869, $32,215 and $1,116, respectively, is attributed to other than temporary declines in market values and is primarily a consequence of wider spreads affecting market values of the securities. At June 30, 2008, we still owned 128 of the investments that we impaired during 2008.

        For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded an impairment charge totaling $22,693 on 19 RMBS and 45 Agency MBS, which was reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The impairment of ten of the 19 RMBS, totaling $7,723, is attributed to the decline in the projected yields related to changes in the cash flow assumptions, such as timing and prepayments, on the underlying assets. The impairment of the remaining nine of the 19 RMBS, totaling $5,642, is attributed to other than temporary declines in market values and is primarily a consequence of wider spreads affecting market values of the securities. The impairment of the 45 Agency MBS, totaling $9,328, is a result of management's intent not to hold these securities (where cost exceeds market value) to recovery.

        Sale of Available for Sale Securities—During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we sold 40 securities for proceeds of $475,888 and realized a gain of $2,477 and we sold 33 securities for proceeds of $702,469 and realized a loss of $6,291. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we sold 11 securities for proceeds of $393,501 and realized a gain of $1,682 and we sold 12 securities for proceeds of $207,065 and realized a loss of $502.

35

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

5. REAL ESTATE LOANS AND REAL ESTATE LOANS HELD FOR SALE

Real Estate Loans

        We invest in mezzanine loans, B Notes, construction loans and whole loans. A mezzanine loan is a loan that is subordinated to a first mortgage loan on a property and is senior to the borrower's equity in the properties. Mezzanine loans are made to the property's owner and are secured by pledges of ownership interests in the property and/or the property owner. The mezzanine lender can foreclose on the pledged interests and thereby succeed to ownership of the property subject to the lien of the first mortgage.

        A subordinated commercial real estate loan, which we refer to as a B Note, may be rated by at least one nationally recognized rating agency. A B Note is typically a privately negotiated loan that is secured by a first mortgage on a single large commercial property or group of related properties; and is subordinated to an A Note secured by the same first mortgage on the same property.

        A construction loan represents a participation in a construction or rehabilitation loan on a commercial property that generally provides 85% to 90% of total project costs and is secured by a first lien mortgage on the property. Alternatively, mezzanine loans can be used to finance construction or rehabilitation where the security is subordinate to the first mortgage lien. Construction loans and mezzanine loans used to finance construction or rehabilitation generally would provide fees and interest income at risk-adjusted rates.

        A whole mortgage loan is a loan secured by a first lien mortgage that provides mortgage financing to commercial and residential property owners and developers. Generally, mortgage loans have maturities that range from three to 10 years for commercial properties and up to 30 years for residential properties.

        The following is a summary of our real estate loans as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

36

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

5. REAL ESTATE LOANS AND REAL ESTATE LOANS HELD FOR SALE (Continued)

        The carrying values of our real estate loans as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include unamortized underwriting fees of $15 and $192, respectively.

        In 2005, we originated a $9,450 mezzanine construction loan to develop luxury residential condominiums in Portland, Oregon. In September 2007, we entered into an agreement with the borrower and the senior lender to increase both the mezzanine construction loan and the senior loan that required additional capital contributions from the project equity holder to cover the remaining costs to complete the project. The mezzanine construction loan bears interest at an annual rate of 16% and had a maturity date of November 2007, which was subsequently extended until May 2008. Under the amended agreement governing the terms of the loan, interest on the loan was paid in cash through March 2006, was capitalized through September 2007, and was contracted to be paid in cash through May 2008 under the terms of the amendment. The loan was placed on non-accrual status as of January 1, 2008 as we have received no interest payments during the six months ended June 30, 2008. We made additional advances during the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaling $103.

        In May 2008, the senior and mezzanine construction loans were further amended to limit the borrower's exposure under a personal guaranty established in connection with the original loan agreements if the borrower makes additional equity contributions totaling $1,500 and finishes construction of the remaining townhome units. In addition, the borrower surrendered all decision-making authority (including the authority to establish the prices at which the remaining units are marketed and sold) to the senior and mezzanine lenders. Our maximum exposure to loss under this agreement as of June 30, 2008 totaled $6,340.

        The financing structures that we offer to the borrowers on certain of our loans involve the creation of entities that could be deemed VIEs and therefore, could be subject to FIN 46R. The September 2007 agreement to provide additional financing discussed above triggered a reconsideration event under FIN 46R. This loan was determined to be a VIE upon entering into the first amendment in September 2007; however, we concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary. Upon executing the May 2008 amendment, we accounted for this loan as a troubled debt restructuring under SFAS No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings ("SFAS 15"), and SFAS 114.

        We have evaluated the financial merits of the project by reviewing the projected unit sales and estimated construction costs and evaluating other collateral available to us (and the expected cost of realizing any recovery on that collateral) under the terms of the loan. We believe that it is probable that we will not recover the entire loan balance, including the capitalized interest, through the satisfaction of future cash flows from sales and other available collateral. Accordingly, based on our analysis, we recorded a provision for loan loss of $4,500 related to this loan during the year ended December 31, 2007 and additional provisions for loan loss of $533 and $3,033 related to this loan during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, due to the failure of the closure of pending condominium sales, combined with currently declining condominium sale prices in the Portland, Oregon area. We will continue to monitor the status of this loan. However, housing prices, in particular condominium prices, may continue to fall, unit sales may continue to lag projections and construction costs may continue to increase, all of which may increase

37

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

5. REAL ESTATE LOANS AND REAL ESTATE LOANS HELD FOR SALE (Continued)

the risk that we will realize additional losses on this loan. No assurance can be given that we will not be required to record additional loan loss reserves with respect to this loan in the future depending on the borrower's ability to complete the project without additional cost overruns. In the event that we determine that it is probable that we will not be able to recover the current carrying value of this loan, additional loan loss reserves will be recorded.

        Currently, the projected total costs to complete the project have increased from $41,400 to $59,733, including capitalized interest. As of June 30, 2008, of the 70 units available, 37 units have been sold.

Real Estate Loans Held for Sale

        As of June 30, 2008, we have committed to sell, or we have the intent and ability to sell in the near future, certain of our real estate loans and therefore, we have classified them as held for sale. The following is a summary of our real estate loans held for sale as of June 30, 2008:

        For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a loan loss of $6,852 and $13,416, respectively, on our consolidated statement of operations relating to real estate loans that are held for sale. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we increased our loan loss provision on our two whole loans that were previously designated as held for sale to $2,695 and classified two mezzanine loans as held for sale, which resulted in a loan loss provision of $5,658.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we sold 11 whole loans that previously had been designated for sale for proceeds of $78,232 and realized a loss of $1,233. We recorded a loan loss provision of $5,062 in connection with these loans for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

        The maturities of our real estate loans, including those held for sale, as of June 30, 2008 are as follows: $6,873 in 2008, $10,846 in 2009, $798 in 2010, $932 in 2011, $1,001 in 2012 and $37,172 thereafter.

38

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

5. REAL ESTATE LOANS AND REAL ESTATE LOANS HELD FOR SALE (Continued)

        We pledged our real estate loans, including those held for sale, to secure our senior mortgage backed notes and secured revolving credit facility. The fair value of the real estate loans that we pledged as collateral as of June 30, 2008 is summarized as follows:

6. COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

        The components of commercial real estate as of June 30, 2008 are as follows:

        The depreciation expense related to commercial real estate included in the operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $3,252 and $1,617, respectively. The depreciation expense related to commercial real estate included in the operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,626 and $1,457, respectively.

        The following is a schedule of future minimum rent payments to be received under the leases at the three properties owned:

39

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

7. OTHER INVESTMENTS

        The components of other investments as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:

        The interest in equity investment represented an investment in a private equity fund that invests in real estate investments. The fund is managed by an affiliate of our Manager and the investment was approved by the independent members of our board of directors. In March 2008, we sold our interest in the fund to an affiliate of our Manager and incurred no gain or loss. The sale was approved by the independent members of our board of directors. As of June 30, 2008, we had no further capital commitment to the private equity fund. Distributions from the fund totaled $426 and $3,132 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Distributions from the fund totaled $0 and $2,481 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Income from the interest in equity investment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 can be broken down in the following components:

40

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND INTANGIBLE LIABILITIES

        The intangible assets and liabilities arose on the acquisition of the commercial real estate properties in March 2007 and September 2007. As of June 30, 2008, the components of intangible assets are as follows:

        The amortization of lease origination costs for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2,792 and $1,492, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization expense. The amortization of lease origination costs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,396 and $1,341, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization expense. The amortization of below-market ground lease, which is included in commercial real estate expenses, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $24 and $14, respectively. The amortization of below-market ground lease, which is included in commercial real estate expenses, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $12 and $12, respectively. The estimated amortization of these intangible assets is $5,633 per year for each of the next five years.

        Below market leases, net of amortization, which are classified as intangible liabilities, are $75,005 as of June 30, 2008. The amortization of intangible liabilities included in rental income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2,740 and $1,410, respectively. The amortization of intangible liabilities included in rental income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,370 and $1,270, respectively. The estimated amortization is $5,480 per year for each of the next five years.

41

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

        The following is a summary of our debt as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

         Repurchase Agreements—As of June 30, 2008, we had entered into master repurchase agreements with various counterparties to finance certain MBS assets on a short term basis. Under these agreements, we sell our assets to the counterparties and agree to repurchase those assets on a certain date at a repurchase price generally equal to the original sales price plus accrued interest. The counterparties will purchase each asset financed under the facility at a percentage of the asset's value on the date of origination, which is the purchase rate, and we will pay interest to the counterparty at short term interest rates (usually based on one-month LIBOR) plus a pricing spread. We have agreed to a schedule of purchase rates and pricing spreads with these counterparties that generally are based upon the class and credit rating of the asset being financed. The facilities are recourse to us. For financial reporting purposes, we characterize all of the borrowings under these facilities as balance sheet financing transactions.

        Under the repurchase agreements, we are required to maintain adequate collateral with these counterparties. If the market value of the collateral we have pledged declines, then the counterparty may require us to provide additional collateral to secure our obligations under the repurchase agreement. As of June 30, 2008, we were not required to provide additional collateral in respect of our repurchase agreement liabilities.

42

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)

        As of June 30, 2008, we had repurchase agreements outstanding in the amount of $22,117 with a weighted average borrowing rate of 4.28%. As of June 30, 2008, the repurchase agreements had remaining weighted average maturities of 4 days and are summarized below:

---

(1)

These borrowings were refinanced by JPMorgan Chase in July 2008.

        As of June 30, 2008, the maturity ranges of our outstanding repurchase agreements segregated by our available for sale securities are as follows:

         Collateralized Debt Obligations—In November 2005, we issued approximately $377,904 of CDOs ("CDO I") through two newly-formed subsidiaries, Crystal River CDO 2005-1, Ltd. (the "2005 Issuer") and Crystal River CDO 2005-1 LLC (the "2005 Co-Issuer"). CDO I consists of $227,500 of investment grade notes and $67,750 of non-investment grade notes, each with a final contractual maturity date of March 2046, which were co-issued by the 2005 Issuer and the 2005 Co-Issuer, and $82,654 of preference shares, which were issued by the 2005 Issuer. We retained all of the non-investment grade securities, the preference shares and the common shares in the 2005 Issuer. The 2005 Issuer holds assets, consisting primarily of whole loans, CMBS and RMBS, which serve as collateral for CDO I. Investment grade notes in the aggregate principal amount of $217,500 were issued with floating coupons with a combined weighted average interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.58% and these notes were hedged at an annual rate of 5.068% to protect CDO I from increases in short-term interest rates. In addition, $10,000 of investment grade notes were issued with a fixed coupon rate of 6.02%. CDO I may be replenished, pursuant to certain rating agency guidelines relating to credit quality and diversification, with substitute collateral for loans that are repaid during the first five years of CDO I. Thereafter, CDO I's securities will be retired in sequential order from the senior-most to junior-most as loans are repaid. We incurred approximately $5,906 of issuance costs, which is amortized over the

43

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)

average life of CDO I. The 2005 Issuer and 2005 Co-Issuer are consolidated in our financial statements. The investment grade notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of the investment grade notes issued were used to repay outstanding debt under our repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2008, CDO I was collateralized by available for sale securities with fair values of $69,916 and the fair value of the investment grade notes that it issued that are held by third parties was $48,171 ($155,388 par amount). As of January 1, 2008, we elected the fair value option under SFAS 159 for our collateralized debt obligations.

        In January 2007, we issued approximately $390,338 of CDOs ("CDO II") through two newly-formed subsidiaries, Crystal River Capital Resecuritization 2006-1 Ltd. (the "2006 Issuer") and Crystal River Capital Resecuritization 2006-1 LLC (the "2006 Co-Issuer"). CDO II consists of $324,956 of investment grade notes and $14,638 of non-investment grade notes, each with a final maturity date of September 2047, which were co-issued by the 2006 Issuer and the 2006 Co-Issuer, and $19,517 of non-investment grade notes and $31,227 of preference shares, which were issued by the 2006 Issuer. The 2006 Issuer initially held cash totaling $58,600 that was designated for the future funding of additional investments, all of which was invested during 2007. We retained all of the non-investment grade securities, the preference shares and the common shares in the 2006 Issuer. The 2006 Issuer holds assets, consisting of CMBS, which serve as collateral for CDO II. Investment grade notes in the aggregate principal amount of $324,956 were issued with floating coupons with a combined weighted average interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.57% and these notes were hedged at an annual rate of 4.955% to protect CDO II from increase in short-term interest rates. We incurred approximately $6,006 of issuance costs, which is being amortized over the average life of CDO II. The 2006 Issuer and the 2006 Co-Issuer are consolidated in our financial statements. The investment grade notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of the investment grade notes issued were used to repay outstanding debt under our repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2008, CDO II was collateralized by available for sale securities with a fair value of $145,658 and the fair value of the investment grade notes that it issued that are held by third parties was $156,598 ($324,956 par amount). As of January 1, 2008, we elected the fair value option under SFAS 159 for our collateralized debt obligations.

         Senior Mortgage-Backed Notes, Related Party—In April 2007, we issued $115,000 of senior mortgage-backed notes through a newly-formed subsidiary, CRZ ABCP Financing LLC. We retained $9,250 of senior subordinated mortgage-backed notes and $4,250 of subordinated mortgage-backed notes. CRZ ABCP Financing LLC holds assets, consisting of commercial whole mortgage loans, which serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed notes. Senior mortgage-backed notes in the aggregate principal amount of $101,500 were issued to an affiliate of our Manager with floating coupons with an interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.35%. The holder of the senior mortgage-backed notes has the ability to charge us to the extent that its cost of funding exceeds the interest rate paid on the senior mortgage-backed notes. Interest on the senior mortgage-backed notes is payable monthly. The senior mortgage-backed notes mature in April 2017 and the outstanding principal is due at maturity. Early repayments or sales of the underlying mortgage loans require repayment of a portion of the senior mortgage-backed notes. The senior mortgage-backed notes are treated as a secured financing, and are

44

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)

non recourse to us. We incurred financing costs of $611, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the senior mortgage-backed notes. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we expensed $410 of deferred financing costs in connection with our partial redemption of senior mortgage-backed notes (see below), which is recorded in other expenses on our statement of operations.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, CRZ ABCP Financing LLC sold 11 commercial whole mortgage loans that previously had been designated for sale for proceeds of $78,232 (See Note 5). In connection with the sale, we entered into a yield maintenance agreement, which required that $4,096 of sale proceeds serve as collateral to protect the buyer against potential prepayments of the 11 real estate loans. The agreement provides that a proportionate share of the collateral will be released quarterly to either the buyer or us contingent on whether any prepayments are made by the respective borrowers of the 11 real estate loans. Proceeds of $78,376 (including accrued interest of $144) from the sale were used to establish a yield maintenance account in the amount of $4,096 (see Note 10), terminate $82,020 notional amount of interest rate swaps within CRZ ABCP Financing at a cost of $2,754, redeem $71,375 of outstanding principal of Class A senior mortgage-backed notes held by an affiliate of our Manager and pay closing costs of $151. In addition, during June 2008, we made an additional capital contribution of $3,000 to CRZ ABCP Financing, which was used to further reduce the balance of the Class A senior mortgage-backed notes.

         Junior Subordinated Notes Held by Trust that Issued Trust Preferred Securities—In March 2007, we formed Crystal River Preferred Trust I ("Trust I") for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. In March 2007, Trust I issued $50,000 of trust preferred securities to an unaffiliated investor and $1,550 of trust common securities to us for $1,550. The combined proceeds were invested by Trust I in $51,550 of junior subordinated notes issued by us. The junior subordinated notes are the sole assets of Trust I and mature in April 2037, but are callable by us at par on or after April 2012. Interest is payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.68% (ten-year LIBOR plus 2.75%) through April 2012 and thereafter at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%. We incurred financing costs of $1,356, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the junior subordinated notes.

         Mortgages Payable—In March 2007, we financed a portion of our purchase of two office buildings located in Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona, with a $198,500 mortgage loan that bears interest at an annual rate of 5.509% and matures on April 1, 2017. The mortgage provides for payments of interest only throughout the term of the loan and the entire principal is due at maturity. We incurred financing costs of $209, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the loan. In September 2007, we financed a portion of our purchase of one office building located in Arlington, Texas with a $20,880 mortgage loan that bears interest at an annual rate of 6.29% and matures on October 1, 2017. The mortgage provides for payments of interest only until October 1, 2010, after which we will be required to make monthly payments of $129 in respect of principal and interest. We will be required to pay the remaining principal and accrued interest at maturity. We incurred financing costs of $98, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the loan.

45

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)

         Revolving Credit Facility—In August 2007, we entered into a $100,000 unsecured 364-day credit facility with Brookfield US Corporation (f/k/a Brascan (U.S.) Corp.), an affiliate of our Manager. Indebtedness outstanding under the unsecured credit facility bore interest at LIBOR + 4.00%. In November 2007, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of September 30, 2007, to convert the facility to a secured revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings of up to $100,000 in the aggregate and expires in May 2009. In March 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of December 31, 2007, to extend the term of the facility from November 2008 to May 2009, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth and to eliminate the financial covenants relating to minimum net income (as defined in the facility), a maximum leverage ratio and interest rate sensitivity. In August 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation further amended the terms of the facility, effective as of June 30, 2008, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth such that after giving effect to the amendment, we are required to maintain a minimum net worth of $40,000. The secured facility bears interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. The credit facility and the amendments were approved by the independent members of our board of directors. The credit agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants limiting dividends, liens, mergers, asset sales and other fundamental changes. In addition, the credit agreement contains additional covenants, which include maintaining a certain minimum net worth. We incurred financing costs of $8, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the secured revolving credit facility.

         Restrictive Covenants and Maturities—Certain of our repurchase agreements and our revolving credit facility contain financial covenants, including maintaining our REIT status and maintaining a specific net asset value or worth. We were in compliance with all of such financial covenants as of December 31, 2007. Effective as of June 30, 2008, we and three of our counterparties amended the terms of our secured revolving credit facility and two of our unused repurchase agreements to reset a net worth covenant that we otherwise would have failed to meet as of June 30, 2008. After giving effect to all such amendments, we were in compliance with all of such financial covenants as of June 30, 2008.

46

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS (Continued)

         Interest Expense—Interest expense is comprised of the following:

        Interest payable is comprised of the following:

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

        We invest in real estate construction loans. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we made advances of $63 under these commitments. On June 30, 2008, our commitment to fund one of our real estate construction loans expired.

        In January 2007, we made a $28,462 investment in a private equity fund that invests in real estate investments. The fund is managed by an affiliate of our Manager and the investment was approved by the independent members of our board of directors. In connection with that investment, we agreed to a future capital commitment of $10,392. Certain distributions from the private equity fund may be recalled by the fund's manager for reinvestment purposes. During March 2008, we sold our investment

47

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

in the private equity fund to an affiliate of our Manager and the purchaser of our investment assumed our unfunded capital commitment. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2008, we had no further commitment with respect to this investment.

        In June 2008, we sold 11 whole loans to a third party (See Note 5). In connection with the sale, we entered into a yield maintenance agreement which serves to protect the buyer against potential prepayments of those 11 whole loans. In accordance with the agreement, we deposited $4,096 into a restricted trust account to serve as collateral for the potential loss contingency. The agreement provides for the quarterly release to either the buyer or us of a proportionate share of the collateral contingent on any prepayments of the 11 whole loans. Our maximum loss contingency under this agreement totaled $4,096. As of June 30, 2008, we accrued a loss contingency totaling $1,000 based on assumptions developed by management relating to the timing and value of expected prepayments on the 11 loans. The loss contingency is recorded as additional realized loss on the sale of real estate loans in our statement of operations.

11. RISK MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS

        Our objectives in using derivatives include reducing our exposure to interest expense movements through our use of interest rate swaps, reducing our exposure to foreign currency movements through our use of foreign currency swaps, and generating additional yield for investing through our use of credit default swaps.

        The fair value of our derivatives as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consisted of the following:

48

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

11. RISK MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

        The notional amount of our interest rate swap open positions and interest rate cap open positions as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:

        As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had unhedged repurchase agreements totaling $2,117 and $596,733, respectively. In addition, we had unhedged liabilities under our secured revolving credit facility totaling $13,420 and $0 as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

        The change in unrealized gains (loss) on interest rate swaps and caps designated as cash flow hedges is separately disclosed in the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. As of June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, unrealized gains (losses) aggregating $(11,593) and $23,646, respectively, on active cash flow hedges were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The net unamortized deferred losses on settled and unsettled swaps as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $11,593 and $2,457, respectively, and is being amortized into earnings through interest expense.

        As a result of the sale of our Agency MBS portfolio and related repayment of our repurchase agreements, we determined that it was no longer probable that the future repurchase agreements that certain of our interest rate swaps were hedging would occur. As a result, we reclassified $9,666 of realized and unrealized loss out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into realized and unrealized gain (loss) in the consolidated statement of operations.

        For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the amount of net realized gains (losses) on settled and active swaps amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings was $445, $(822), $300 and $(432), respectively.

49

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

11. RISK MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

        The components of net realized and unrealized loss on derivatives are as follows:

        As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we were required to provide collateral in respect of our interest rate swaps in the amount of $1,677 and $18,276, respectively, which is included in restricted cash on the balance sheet.

        The maturities of the notional amounts of our interest rate swaps and caps outstanding as of June 30, 2008 are as follows: $200,000 in 2009, $47,189 in 2013, $20,000 in 2015, $265,467 in 2018, and $25,835 in 2020.

        As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we held various credit default swaps, as the protection buyer and seller, with notional amounts of $20,000 and $75,000, respectively. A credit default swap ("CDS") is a financial instrument used to transfer the credit risk of a reference entity from one party to another for a specified period of time. In a standard CDS contract, one party, referred to as the protection buyer, purchases credit default protection from another party, referred to as the protection seller, for a specific notional amount of obligations of a reference entity. In these transactions, the protection buyer pays a premium to the protection seller. The premium generally is paid monthly in arrears, but may be paid in full up front in the case of a CDS with a short maturity. Generally, if a credit event occurs during the term of the CDS, the protection seller pays the protection buyer the notional amount and takes delivery of the reference entity's obligation. CDS are generally unconditional, irrevocable and non-cancelable. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we closed out six CDS on single names in an aggregate notional amount of $55,000, with a realized loss of approximately $30,249, of which $19,780 was accrued in 2007 as an unrealized loss. As of June 30, 2008, we had posted cash of $18,580 as collateral in connection with our single name CDS, which is included in restricted cash on the balance sheet.

50

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

12. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

        In March 2005, we completed the Private Offering in which we sold 17,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, at an offering price of $25 per share, including the purchase of 400,000 shares of common stock by the initial purchasers/placement agents pursuant to an over-allotment option. We received proceeds from these transactions in the amount of $405,613, net of underwriting commissions, placement agent fees and other offering costs totaling $29,387. In August 2006, we completed the Public Offering in which we sold 7,500,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $23 per share. The proceeds received from the Public Offering were $158,599, which was net of underwriting and other offering costs of $13,901. Each share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote per share.

        In March 2005, we adopted a Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") which provides for awards under the Plan in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted and unrestricted stock awards, restricted stock units, deferred stock units and other performance awards. Our Manager and our officers, employees, directors, advisors and consultants who provide services to us are eligible to receive awards under the Plan. The Plan has a term of 10 years and, based on awards since adoption, limits awards through December 31, 2008 to a maximum of 2,502,180 shares of common stock. For subsequent periods, the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be subject to awards granted under the Plan can increase by 10% of the difference between the number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of the current calendar year and the prior calendar year. In no event will the total number of shares that can be issued under the Plan exceed 10,000,000.

        In connection with the Plan, a total of 84,000 shares of restricted common stock and 126,000 stock options (exercise price of $25 per share) were granted to our Manager in March 2005. The Manager subsequently transferred these shares and options to certain of its officers and employees, certain of our directors and other individuals associated with our Manager who provide services to us. The restrictions on the restricted common stock lapse and full rights of ownership vest for one-third of the restricted shares and options on each of the first three anniversary dates of issuance. Vesting is predicated on the continuing involvement of our Manager in providing services to us. In addition, 3,500 shares of unrestricted stock were granted to the independent members of our board of directors in March 2005 in lieu of cash remunerations. The independent members of our board of directors fully vested in the shares on the date of grant.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we issued 2,000 shares of restricted common stock to an independent member of our board of directors. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2008, we also issued 28,592 deferred stock units and restricted stock units to certain independent members of our board of directors. Of these amounts, 22,537 deferred stock units and restricted stock units and 2,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued in lieu of cash remunerations. These independent members of our board of directors fully vested in the deferred stock units at the date of grant.

        For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, $2, $484, $11 and $165, respectively, was expensed relating to the amortization of the restricted stock and the stock options. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months

51

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

12. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (Continued)

ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, $209, $252, $95 and $132, respectively, was expensed relating to the amortization of deferred stock units.

        The Binomial option pricing model was used for pricing our stock options with the following assumptions as of March 15, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

---

(1)

March 15, 2008 represents the vesting date of all outstanding stock options.

        Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Our stock options have characteristics that are significantly different from those of traded options and changes in the subjective input assumptions could materially affect the fair value estimate.

        Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was comprised of the following:

        Total comprehensive loss totaled $205,794, $38,584, $65,124 and $19,771 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

13. FINANCIAL RISKS

        We are subject to various risks, including credit, interest rate and market risk. We are subject to interest rate risk to the extent that our interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price at different speeds, or different bases, than our interest-earning assets. Credit risk is the risk of default on our investments that results in a counterparty's failure to make payments according to the terms of the contract.

52

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

13. FINANCIAL RISKS (Continued)

        Market risk reflects changes in the value of the securities and real estate loans due to changes in interest rates or other market factors, including the rate of prepayments of principal and the value of the collateral underlying our available for sale securities and real estate loans.

        As of June 30, 2008, the mortgage loans in the underlying collateral pools for all securities we owned were secured by properties predominantly in Texas (16%), Arizona (14%), New York (14%), California (9%) and Florida (5%). All other states or countries comprise individually less than 5% as of June 30, 2008.

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        We have entered into a management agreement, as amended (the "Agreement"), with our Manager. The initial term of the Agreement expires in December 2008. After the initial term, the Agreement will be automatically renewed for a one-year term each anniversary date thereafter unless we or our Manager terminate the Agreement. The Agreement provides that our Manager will provide us with investment management services and certain administrative services and will perform our day-to-day operations. The monthly base management fee for such services is equal to 1.5% of one-twelfth of our equity, as defined in the Agreement, payable in arrears.

        In addition, under the Agreement, our Manager earns a quarterly incentive fee equal to 25% of the amount by which the quarterly net income per share, as defined in the Agreement (which principally excludes the effect of stock compensation and the unrealized change in derivatives), exceeds an amount equal to the product of the weighted average of the price per share of the common stock we issued in the Private Offering and in the Public Offering and the price per share of common stock in any subsequent offerings by us, multiplied by the higher of (i) 2.4375% or (ii) 25% of the then applicable 10 year Treasury note rate plus 0.50%, multiplied by the then weighted average number of outstanding shares for the quarter. The incentive fee is paid quarterly. The Agreement provides that 10% of the incentive management fee is to be paid in shares of our common stock (providing that such payment does not result in our Manager owning directly or indirectly more than 9.8% of our issued and outstanding common stock) and the balance is to be paid in cash. Our Manager may, at its sole discretion, elect to receive a greater percentage of its incentive management fee in shares of our common stock. The incentive management fees included in our consolidated statements of operations that were incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $0, $124, $0 and $0, respectively. In accordance with the Agreement, we issued to our Manager shares of our common stock in respect of 10% of such incentive management fees, which totaled 445 shares for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

        The Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the independent members of our board of directors after the expiration of the initial term and by providing at least 180 days prior notice based upon either: (i) unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is materially detrimental to us, or (ii) a determination by the independent members of our board of directors that the management fees payable to our Manager are not fair (subject to our Manager's right to prevent a compensation termination by agreeing to a mutually acceptable reduction of the

53

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

management fees). If we terminate the Agreement, then we must pay our Manager a termination fee equal to twice the sum of the average annual base and incentive fees earned by our Manager during the two twelve-month periods immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination.

        We issued to our Manager 84,000 shares of our restricted common stock and granted options to purchase 126,000 shares of our common stock for a 10 year period at a price of $25 per share in March 2005. We issued to one of our executive officers 30,000 shares of restricted common stock in March 2006. 10,000 of such shares vested on March 15, 2007 and the remaining 20,000 shares were forfeited in April 2007 when the executive officer to whom such shares were issued resigned from his position with us. We issued to one of our directors 2,000 shares of restricted stock in November 2006 and 2,000 shares of restricted stock in May 2007, both of which vest on the first anniversary of the date of issuance. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the base management expense was $1,112, $3,732, $418 and $1,682, respectively. Included in the management fee expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is $(27), 449, $0 and $146, respectively, of amortization of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock and options granted. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the three months ended June 30, 2008, we paid our base management fee to our Manager in shares of our common stock and, after the respective periods, issued to our Manager 168,336 and 99,998 shares of common stock, respectively.

        The Agreement provides that we are required to reimburse our Manager for certain expenses incurred by our Manager on our behalf provided that such costs and reimbursements are no greater than that which would be paid to outside professionals or consultants on an arm's length basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we were not charged any reimbursable costs by our Manager.

        In January 2007, we purchased a $28,462 investment in BREF One, LLC (the "Fund"), a real estate finance fund sponsored by Brookfield Asset Management, and incurred a $10,392 unfunded capital commitment to the Fund. The acquisition was made from two subsidiaries of Brookfield Asset Management. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we sold our interest in the Fund to an affiliate of our Manager and the purchaser assumed our unfunded capital commitment. In addition, loss from the equity investment in the Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $40.

        In April 2007, we issued $115,000 of senior mortgage-backed notes through a newly-formed subsidiary, CRZ ABCP Financing LLC. We retained $9,250 of senior subordinated mortgage-backed notes and $4,250 of subordinated mortgage-backed notes. CRZ ABCP Financing LLC holds assets, consisting of commercial whole mortgage loans, which serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed notes. Senior mortgage-backed notes in the aggregate principal amount of $101,500 were issued to an affiliate of our Manager with floating coupons with an interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.35%. Interest on the senior mortgage-backed notes is payable monthly. The senior mortgage-backed notes mature in April 2017 and the outstanding principal is due at maturity. Early repayments of the underlying mortgage loans require repayment of a portion of the senior mortgage-backed notes. The

54

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

senior mortgage-backed notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of the senior mortgage-backed notes issued were used to repay outstanding debt under our repurchase agreements. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, CRZ ABCP Financing LLC sold 11 commercial whole mortgage loans that previously had been designated for sale for proceeds of $78,232. The net proceeds of $74,142 were used to repay a portion of the senior mortgage-backed notes that are held by an affiliate of our Manager. In addition, during June 2008, we made an additional capital contribution of $3,000 to CRZ ABCP Financing, which was used to further reduce the balance of the Class A senior mortgage-backed notes. As of June 30, 2008, the mortgage-backed notes were collateralized by real estate loans with a carrying value of $27,130.

        In August 2007, we entered into a $100,000 unsecured 364-day credit facility with Brookfield US Corporation (f/k/a Brascan (U.S.) Corp.), an affiliate of our Manager. Indebtedness outstanding under the unsecured credit facility bore interest at LIBOR + 4.00%. In November 2007, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of September 30, 2007, to convert the facility to a secured revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings of up to $100,000 in the aggregate and expires in May 2009. In March 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of December 31, 2007, to extend the term of the facility from November 2008 to May 2009, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth and to eliminate the financial covenants relating to minimum net income (as defined in the facility), a maximum leverage ratio and interest rate sensitivity. In August 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation further amended the terms of the facility, effective as of June 30, 2008, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth such that after giving effect to the amendment, we are required to maintain a minimum net worth of $40,000. The secured facility bears interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. The credit facility and the amendments were approved by the independent members of our board of directors. The credit agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants limiting dividends, liens, mergers, asset sales and other fundamental changes. In addition, the credit agreement contains additional covenants, which include maintaining a certain minimum net worth. We incurred financing costs of $8, which have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the secured revolving credit facility.

55

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

        The following amounts from related party transactions are included in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

        The following amounts from related party transactions are included in our consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

        We and our Manager have entered into sub-advisory agreements with other affiliated entities and the fees payable under such agreements will be paid from any management fees earned by our Manager. In addition, certain of these affiliated sub-advisory entities introduced investments to us for purchase that we acquired for a total of $0 and $262,705 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The purchase price of two commercial real estate properties that we purchased during the six months ended June 30, 2007 from an affiliate of our Manager, at a total cost of $234,243, were determined as part of a competitive bid process, and the purchase price of our investment in a private equity fund managed by an affiliate of our Manager, at a total initial cost of $28,462, was acquired at its book value assuming hypothetical liquidation. All such acquisitions were approved in advance by the independent members of our board of directors.

56

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

15. EARNINGS PER SHARE

        The following table sets forth the calculation of Basic and Diluted EPS for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

        The following table sets forth the calculation of Basic and Diluted EPS for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

        As of June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, options to purchase a total of 130,000 shares of common stock have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as they were determined to be antidilutive.

57

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

16. SEGMENT REPORTING

        We determined that we operate in two reportable segments: a Securities, Loans and Other segment and a Commercial Real Estate segment. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies as discussed in Note 2. The reportable segments were determined based on the allocation of our investment portfolio between investment activity and commercial real estate operations in which separate performance data is produced and analyzed by management and our chief operating decision-maker.

        Our Securities, Loans and Other segment includes all of our investment activities related to securities, real estate loans and equity investments. Our Commercial Real Estate segment includes all of our activities related to the ownership and leasing of the three commercial real properties.

        The following table summarizes our segment reporting for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and our total assets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

58

---

Table of Contents

Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2008

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)

16. SEGMENT REPORTING (Continued)

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

        On July 1, 2008, one of our construction loans was repaid in full at maturity in the amount of $9,664.

        On July 16, 2008, we sold two whole loans that secured our senior mortgage-backed notes for a total purchase price of $27,192, including accrued interest of $62. The proceeds from the sale were used to terminate $25,835 notional amount of interest rate swaps within CRZ ABCP Financing at a cost of $1,372, to redeem $24,024 of outstanding principal of Class A senior mortgage-backed notes and accrued interest that was held by an affiliate of our Manager, to redeem $1,779 of outstanding principal of Class B senior mortgage-backed notes and accrued interest that is held by us and to pay closing costs of $17.

        In June 2008, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share, which was paid on July 28, 2008 to our stockholders of record as of June 30, 2008. In connection with that dividend, we paid a total of $7,433 in cash in respect of the 24,775,283 shares that did not participate in our dividend reinvestment plan and we issued zero shares to the stockholders that participated in our dividend reinvestment plan.

        In August 2008, we issued to our Manager 99,998 shares of our common stock in lieu or cash remuneration in respect of the base management fee for the second quarter of 2008. These shares were issued at the weighted average closing price of our common stock for the last five trading days of the second quarter, which amounted to $4.18 per share.

        During July and August 2008, a significant portion of the securities held by CDO I was downgraded by the rating agencies. These downgrades, if unremedied by the next CDO payment date, scheduled for early September, 2008, would cause further trigger failures. These further trigger failures would result in all of the interest income that we would otherwise receive being used to pay down senior CDO notes.

59

---

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Historical results set forth are not necessarily indicative of our future financial position and results of operations.

Overview

        We are a specialty finance company formed on January 25, 2005 by Hyperion Brookfield Asset Management, Inc., which we refer to as Hyperion Brookfield, to invest in commercial real estate, real estate loans, real estate related securities, such as commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities, and various other asset classes. We commenced operations in March 2005. We have elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2005 and expect to qualify as a REIT in subsequent tax years. We manage the composition of our portfolio so that we will qualify for an exclusion from regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which we refer to as the Investment Company Act. We are externally managed by Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River Capital Advisors, LLC, which we refer to as Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River or our Manager. Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hyperion Brookfield.

        Beginning in 2005, we invested in Agency mortgage-backed securities, non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other commercial mortgage loan products, including whole loans, A Notes, B Notes, mezzanine loans, and investments in funds that invest in whole loans, A Notes, B Notes, and mezzanine loans. We also took positions in various credit default swaps relating to commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities and entered into interest rate swaps to hedge the basis risk of our floating rate liabilities. We leveraged the portfolio in order to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns. We issued four types of liabilities:

•

trust preferred securities;



•

CDO liabilities;



•

secured mortgage debt; and



•

short-term liabilities.

        We completed a private offering of 17,400,000 shares of our common stock in March 2005 in which we raised net proceeds of approximately $405.6 million. We completed our initial public offering of 7,500,000 shares of our common stock in August 2006 in which we raised net proceeds of approximately $158.6 million. As of June 30, 2008, we have a portfolio comprised of commercial mortgage-backed securities, commercial real estate loan products, residential mortgage-backed securities and operating real estate of approximately $600.8 million, and have issued liabilities totaling approximately $560.3 million. The resulting GAAP-reported stockholders' equity of $60.9 million represents a reduction of $503.3 million of the net amounts raised in 2005 and 2006. This reduction in stockholders' equity can be attributed to the following general areas:

•

realized losses on disposition of assets, credit default swaps and interest rate swaps;



•

dividends paid in excess of GAAP earnings;



•

impairment of loans and other decreases in market values on assets for which we have projected a decline in future cash flows; and



•

decreases in market values on assets that solely are attributable to spread widening.

        We earn revenues and generate cash through our investments. These revenues are, in turn, used to pay the interest and other costs of our financings (including payments due on interest rate hedges), to pay for our overhead costs and to pay the management fee. The net earnings after these payments are used to pay dividends to our stockholders, to further reduce our liabilities or to re-invest into targeted assets. In order to maintain compliance with the REIT regulations, we are required to pay out at least

60

---

Table of Contents

90% of our taxable income as dividends. Typically there are mismatches between taxable income and GAAP income. Due to realized losses that we have incurred to date and the projected decline in cash flows of some of our assets, we currently expect to generate substantial tax operating losses in 2008 and in future periods. Thus, our net earnings are projected to be in excess of our taxable income for the next several years. This mismatch may permit us to use a certain amount of our net earnings to further reduce our liabilities or to re-invest, rather than pay these net earnings to stockholders as a dividend.

Trends; Current Market Environment; Current Portfolio Considerations

        In July of last year, the commercial real estate finance sector began to show serious signs of liquidity-related distress. This was in addition to the distress that had already begun in the securitized residential products markets. Now, over one year later, commercial real estate credit markets have begun to experience a second layer of stress, as adverse credit events at the underlying loan level have begun to increase, and, in the residential sector, many of the long-awaited losses from the high delinquency levels are starting to percolate through the various structures.

        Evidence of an increase in adverse credit events that impair asset quality and value can be seen in the market-wide CMBS delinquency statistics and the operating results of certain financial companies with exposure to commercial real estate loans and CMBS. These developments affect the marketplace, and Crystal River, by further reducing liquidity, cash flows and asset values.

        Specific to RMBS, while we are cautiously optimistic that the recently enacted governmental programs will have some positive impact on certain sub prime loans and securitizations, including portions of the Company's portfolio, we do not believe that the overall market will stabilize until home prices firm up and the impact of these lower home prices work through the various real estate financing markets.

        In terms of CMBS, as liquidity is essentially frozen (i.e., there are limited new financings and refinancings), the market will be largely impacted by the credit performance of existing securitized portfolios. We expect that loans that do not have near-term maturities that were underwritten with the related secured properties having cash flow in place will tend to perform better during this difficult period. By contrast, we believe that loans made on transitional, or other value-creating, projects that have near-term maturities will suffer the greatest. The markets will be greatly impacted by these loans with near-term maturities; causing the existing credit spread environment to last until the consequences of these near-term loan maturities are better understood. The Company, through its CMBS portfolio and its commercial real estate loan portfolio, has exposure to each of these loan types. Specifically, our commercial real estate loan portfolio has two loan maturities in 2008 and two loan maturities in 2009; all other loans have long-term maturities. Our CMBS portfolio, which is comprised solely of fixed rate conduit deals, which generally do not have near-term maturities, will not start to have material maturities in the underlying collateral pools until 2010.

        As discussed in Note 3, "Fair Value Hierarchy", to our consolidated financial statements, we value our available for sale securities and held for sale securities using current market pricing. The spreads that have been utilized to value our assets are extremely wide from a historical perspective. These spreads are wide due to the market's view of the risks contained within these types of investments within the current market environment. These risks include the market's expectation of increasing delinquencies and losses within residential and commercial mortgage loans, and consequently the securitized pools that own these loans. The market's expectation is also that commercial and residential loans originated in the period from 2005 to 2007 will under-perform prior vintages. These market expectations become embodied in the modeling assumptions that are used to value securities such as the RMBS and CMBS that we own. The valuation of these assets is extremely sensitive to these assumptions. Additionally, there are many factors for which there is no relevant comparable data to use in order to help judge that particular factor's impact on future performance. For instance, many of the underlying residential and commercial mortgages originated during the 2005 to 2007 era have very low interest rate coupons. These low coupons may prove to dampen credit losses that otherwise are

61

---

Table of Contents

expected by the market. As these origination vintages age, performance tiering may become evident; meaning that the 2005 vintage may exhibit stronger performance than the 2006 or 2007 vintages. In the current marketplace, there is no evidence of any meaningful tiering among these three vintages. Additionally, the recently enacted Governmental programs may have a positive impact on certain sub-prime borrowers and sub-prime loan pools. Conversely, consumer retail weakness, job losses and a weak economy may result in credit losses exceeding the market's expectations. It is the use of these assumptions that causes there to be both upside potential as well as downside risk to the current market value of our assets.

        We believe the following trends may also affect our business:

        Uncertain interest rate environment—We believe that the credit market disruption that has persisted since the summer of 2007 continues to have a dramatic effect on the economy. The distress in the financial markets has led to significant changes in Federal Reserve Monetary Policy, in the form of lower rates and through direct financing to primary dealers and lending to facilitate the buy-out of a major broker-dealer. However, pressure from a pull back in lending and credit provision still weighs heavily on the consumer and on the residential housing markets. Continued weakness in the residential real estate markets and lending environment is likely to persist, and in general should result in slower U.S. economic growth. Additionally, lower rates have not resulted in dramatically increased prepayment speeds, largely given the constraints around lending, which have increased even on the part of the US Government-sponsored entities.

        Normally, we would expect that our fixed-rate assets would decline in value in a rising interest rate environment. We have engaged in interest rate swaps to hedge a portion of the risk associated with increases in interest rates. However, because we do not always hedge 100% of the amount of financing outstanding, increases in interest rates could result in a decline in the value of our portfolio, net of hedges. Similarly, decreases in interest rates could result in an increase in the value of our portfolio. Given the substantial dislocation in asset prices, however, these traditional relationships between levels of interest rates and yield spread or price changes, may not exist.

        Prepayment rates—Typically, as interest rates fall, prepayment rates on residential mortgages rise. However, this cycle could be different as the decline in housing market activity could keep prepayment rates low. Prepayment rates also may be affected by other factors, including, without limitation, conditions in the housing and financial markets, general economic conditions and the relative interest rates on mortgage loans.

        Liquidity—Managing liquidity has become a priority for our company. Whereas most of our assets, such as the commercial real estate properties and the assets held by our CDOs, have been financed with long-term liabilities, some of our assets are financed short-term while they are in transition toward longer-term financing solutions. These short-term financings typically are collateralized reverse repurchase agreements or collateralized borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As asset values decline, margin calls from our financing counterparties place demands on our cash and other liquidity sources. This can force us to sell assets and de-leverage the balance sheet, which could negatively impact earnings and negatively impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

        Weakness of mortgage market—The sub-prime market has been severely affected by changes in the lending landscape; for now and for the foreseeable future, access to mortgages for sub-prime borrowers has been substantially limited. This limitation on financing is expected to have an impact on all mortgage loans that are resetting and is expected to result in increased default rates. The severity of the liquidity limitation was largely unanticipated by the markets. As well, the liquidity issues also affect prime and alt-a Non-Agency lending, with mortgage rates remaining much higher and the origination of many product types being completely curtailed. At the margin, this has an impact on new demand for homes, which will compress the home ownership rates and weigh heavily on future home price performance. There is a strong correlation between home price growth rates and mortgage loan delinquencies. This comes in addition to the delinquency pressures in the sub-prime market resulting from weaker underwriting, which put many sub-prime lenders out of business in 2006 and 2007. The

62

---

Table of Contents

market deterioration has caused us to expect increased losses related to our holdings over time, and in the immediate period, has resulted in a significant decline in the market values of our assets. We continually monitor and adjust our cash flow assumptions in light of current and projected market conditions, and we believe that results in an accurate representation of value on our balance sheet.

        We believe that, at this time, the underlying losses in the sub-prime market have not fully manifested themselves in the securitizations. Accordingly, there are a number of factors that can help to mitigate issues before they fully impact the market. The government does have a number of programs that it can utilize to help the conditions in the mortgage industry. Currently, the lending limits for Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Government National Mortgage Association have been raised. As well, recent legislation has expanded and modernized the FHA programs to make financing available at affordable terms to delinquent borrowers. At the margin, programs that will have the effect of reducing foreclosure inventory will be helpful to the resolution of home price declines.

        Other markets, such as the Alt-A and Option ARM market have also come under more significant delinquency and pricing pressure beginning in the first quarter of 2008. As a result of large forced sales and rising delinquency rates on these programs, price declines have been significant even for AAA-rated securities. These price dislocations have also been felt in the prime markets on both fixed-rate and hybrid arm Non-Agency securities, across most vintages. Performance remains stronger for loans underwritten prior to 2005, and for fixed rate loans; however, the magnitude of the price declines currently exceeds the expectations of loss for these sectors.

        Structured finance transactions—The dislocations in the sub-prime market have rippled throughout the structured finance markets. Despite continued positive fundamental performance, yield spreads on CMBS and prime Non-Agency RMBS have widened dramatically during 2007 and 2008, resulting in significant negative market value adjustments to our assets. The issuance of CDOs, which had been a key financing tool for us and for our peers, has come to a halt, cutting off an attractive financing alternative for the foreseeable future.

        For a discussion of additional risks relating to our business see the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. A copy of these risk factors, updated as of June 30, 2008, is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this report.

Critical Accounting Estimates

        Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments. These include fair market value of certain assets, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment assumptions, and other items that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes in these estimates (e.g., market values change due to changes in supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments, interest rates, or other reasons; yields change due to changes in credit outlook and loan prepayments) will occur in the near future. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and assessments that could affect our reported assets and liabilities as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our financial statements are based were reasonable at the time made based upon information available to us at that time. We rely on the experience of Hyperion Brookfield and Crystal River's management and its analysis of historical and current market data in order to arrive at what we believe to be reasonable estimates. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere herein for a complete discussion of our accounting policies. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ

63

---

Table of Contents

from our estimates and differences may be material. We have identified our most critical accounting estimates to be the following:

Investment Consolidation

        For each investment we make, we evaluate the underlying entity that issued the securities we acquired or to which we made a loan in order to determine the appropriate accounting. We refer to guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities ("SFAS 140"), and FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46R"), in performing our analysis. FIN 46R addresses the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which voting rights are not effective in identifying an investor with a controlling financial interest. An entity is subject to consolidation under FIN 46R if the investors either do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, are unable to direct the entity's activities, or are not exposed to the entity's losses or entitled to its residual returns ("variable interest entities" or "VIEs"). Variable interest entities within the scope of FIN 46R are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to be the party that absorbs a majority of the VIE's expected losses, receives the majority of the VIE's expected returns, or both.

        Our ownership of the subordinated classes of CMBS and RMBS from a single issuer may provide us with the right to control the foreclosure/workout process on the underlying loans, which we refer to as the Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS. There are certain exceptions to the scope of FIN 46R, one of which provides that an investor that holds a variable interest in a qualifying special-purpose entity ("QSPE") is not required to consolidate that entity unless the investor has the unilateral ability to cause the entity to liquidate. SFAS 140 sets forth the requirements for an entity to qualify as a QSPE. To maintain the QSPE exception, the special-purpose entity must initially meet the QSPE criteria and must continue to satisfy such criteria in subsequent periods. A special-purpose entity's QSPE status can be impacted in future periods by activities undertaken by its transferor(s) or other involved parties, including the manner in which certain servicing activities are performed. To the extent that our CMBS or RMBS investments were issued by a special-purpose entity that meets the QSPE requirements, we record those investments at the purchase price paid. To the extent the underlying special-purpose entities do not satisfy the QSPE requirements, we follow the guidance set forth in FIN 46R as the special-purpose entities would be determined to be VIEs.

        We have analyzed the pooling and servicing agreements governing each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments and we believe that the terms of those agreements are industry standard and are consistent with the QSPE criteria. However, there is uncertainty with respect to QSPE treatment for those special-purpose entities due to ongoing review by regulators and accounting standard setters (including the project of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") to amend SFAS 140 and the recently added FASB project on servicer discretion in a QSPE), potential actions by various parties involved with the QSPE (discussed in the paragraph above) and varying and evolving interpretations of the QSPE criteria under SFAS 140. We also have evaluated each of our Controlling Class CMBS and RMBS investments for which we own a greater than 50% interest in the subordinated class as if the special-purpose entities that issued such securities are not QSPEs. Using the fair value approach to calculate expected losses or residual returns, we have concluded that we would not be the primary beneficiary of any of the underlying special-purpose entities. Additionally, the standard setters continue to review the FIN 46R provisions related to the computations used to determine the primary beneficiary of VIEs. Future guidance from regulators and standard setters may require us to consolidate the special-purpose entities that issued the CMBS and RMBS in which we have invested as described in the section titled "Variable Interest Entities" in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

        Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our investment in these QSPEs totaled $77.0 million as of June 30, 2008.

64

---

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

        The most significant source of our revenue comes from interest income on our securities and loan investments. Interest income on loans and securities investments is recognized over the life of the investment using the effective interest method. Mortgage loans will generally be originated or purchased at or near par value and interest income will be recognized based on the contractual terms of the debt instrument. Any loan fees or acquisition costs on originated loans will be deferred and recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to the yield. Interest income on MBS is recognized on the effective interest method as required by Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets ("EITF 99-20"). Under EITF 99-20, management estimates, at the time of purchase, the future expected cash flows and determines the effective interest rate based on these estimated cash flows and our purchase prices. Subsequent to the purchase and on a quarterly basis, these estimated cash flows are updated and a revised yield is calculated based on the current amortized cost of the investment. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties and contingencies. These include the rate and timing of principal payments (including prepayments, repurchases, defaults and liquidations), the pass through or coupon rate and interest rate fluctuations. In addition, interest payment shortfalls have to be estimated due to delinquencies on the underlying mortgage loans and the timing and magnitude of credit losses on the mortgage loans underlying the securities. These uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may affect management's estimates and our interest income. When current period cash flow estimates are lower than the previous period and fair value is less than an asset's carrying value, we will write down the asset to fair market value and record an impairment charge in current period earnings.

        Through its extensive experience in investing in MBS, Hyperion Brookfield has developed models based on historical data in order to estimate the lifetime prepayment speeds and lifetime credit losses for pools of mortgage loans. The models are based primarily on loan characteristics, such as loan-to-value ratios ("LTV"), borrower credit scores, loan type, loan rate, property type, etc., and also include other qualitative factors such as the loan originator and servicer. Once the models have been used to project the base case prepayment speeds and to project the base case cumulative loss, those outputs are used to create yield estimates and to project cash flows.

        Because mortgage assets amortize over long periods of time (i.e., 25 to 30 years in the case of RMBS assets or 10 years in the case of CMBS assets), the expected lifetime prepayment experience and the expected lifetime credit losses projected by the models are subject to modification in light of actual experience assessed from time to time. For each of the purchased mortgage pools, our Manager tracks the actual monthly prepayment experience and the monthly loss experience, if any. To the extent that the actual performance trend over a 6-12 month period of time does not reasonably approximate the expected lifetime trend, in consideration of the seasoning of the asset, our Manager may make adjustments to the assumptions and revise yield estimates and projected cash flows.

        We have retained substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of our rental properties and therefore we account for leases with our tenants as operating leases. The total amount of contractual rent that we receive from operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease; and a straight-line or free rent receivable, as applicable, is recorded for the difference between the rental revenue recorded and the contractual amount received. In addition to base rent, the tenants in our commercial real estate properties also pay substantially all operating costs.

        Expense reimbursement income arising from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses and real estate expenses of the respective property is accrued in the same period as the related expenses are incurred. These recoverable expenses are included in expenses as commercial real estate expenses.

65

---

Table of Contents

        Income arising from the operation of parking garages is recognized when the parking spaces are occupied. Expenses related to the operation of parking garages are included in expenses as commercial real estate expenses.

Loan Loss Provisions

        We purchase and originate mezzanine loans and commercial mortgage loans to be held as long-term investments. We evaluate each of these loans for possible impairment on a quarterly basis. Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Upon determination of impairment, we will establish a reserve for loan losses and a corresponding charge to earnings through the provision for loan losses. Significant judgments are required in determining impairment, which include assumptions regarding the value of the real estate or partnership interests that secure the mortgage loans.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

        We measure financial instruments, derivatives and our collateralized debt obligations at fair value. We account for real estate loans held for sale at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell. Realized and unrealized gains or losses from our available for sale securities and collateralized debt obligations within our CDO entities for which we elected the fair value option are recorded in our statements of operations. Unrealized gains or losses from our available for sale securities for which we did not elect the fair value option are recorded through other comprehensive income or loss. Impairments on our available for sale securities for which we did not elect the fair value option are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the carrying amount or fair value of our real estate loans held for sale are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations.

        We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"), in the first quarter of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Additionally and also in the first quarter of 2008, we adopted SFAS 159, and applied this option to the available for sale securities and collateralized debt obligations within our CDO legal entities.

        SFAS 157 defines "fair value" as the price that would be received on the sale of an asset or that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, or an exit price. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and require less judgment to be utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted have less observability and are measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. Pricing observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established, the characteristics specific to the transaction and overall market conditions generally.

        The overall valuation process for financial instruments may include adjustments to valuations derived from pricing models. These adjustments may be made when, in management's judgment, either the size of the position in the financial instrument or other features of the financial instrument such as its complexity, or the market in which the financial instrument is traded (such as counterparty, credit, concentration or liquidity), require that an adjustment be made to the value derived from the pricing models. An adjustment may be made if a trade of a financial instrument is subject to sales restrictions that would result in a price less than the computed fair value measurement from a quoted market price. Additionally, an adjustment from the price derived from a model typically reflects management's judgment that other participants in the market for the financial instrument being measured at fair value would also consider such an adjustment in pricing that same financial instrument.

66

---

Table of Contents

        We have categorized our financial instruments measured at fair value into a three-level classification in accordance with SFAS 157. Fair value measurements of financial instruments that use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are generally categorized as Level 1, and fair value measurements of financial instruments that have no direct observable levels are generally categorized as Level 3. The lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of a financial instrument is used to categorize the instrument and reflects the judgment of management. Financial assets and liabilities presented at fair value in our Balance Sheet generally are categorized as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

The types of assets and liabilities carried at Level 1 fair value generally are G-7 government and agency securities, equities listed in active markets, investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices and listed derivatives.

Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument's anticipated life.

Fair valued assets and liabilities that are generally included in this category are non-G-7 government securities, municipal bonds, certain hybrid financial instruments, certain mortgage and asset backed securities, certain corporate debt, certain commitments and guarantees, certain private equity investments and certain derivatives for which observable market inputs can be obtained.

Level 3—Inputs that are not observable through correlation with market data (quotes from dealers in securities and independent pricing services without observable inputs) and inputs that reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

Generally, assets and liabilities carried at fair value and included in this category are certain mortgage and asset-backed securities, certain corporate debt, certain private equity investments, certain commitments and guarantees and certain derivatives.

        Financial assets and liabilities presented at fair value and categorized as Level 3 are generally financial instruments that relate to quotes from dealers and prices obtained from independent pricing services that do not have observable inputs with market data. In addition, Level 3 also includes financial instruments with those that are marked to model using relevant empirical data to extrapolate an estimated fair value. The models' inputs reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument in a current period transaction and outcomes from the models represent an exit price and expected future cash flows. Our valuation models are calibrated to the market on a frequent basis. The parameters and inputs are adjusted for assumptions about risk and current market conditions. Changes to inputs in valuation models are not changes to valuation methodologies; rather, the inputs are modified to reflect direct or indirect impacts on asset classes from changes in market conditions. Accordingly, results from valuation models in one period may not be indicative of future period measurements. Valuations are independently reviewed by employees of our manager and, where applicable, valuations are back tested comparing instruments sold to where they were marked. Different judgments and assumptions used in pricing could result in different estimates of value.

        In accordance with SFAS 157, valuation techniques used for assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value are generally categorized into three types:

Market Approach—Market approach valuation techniques use prices and other relevant information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include comparables and matrix pricing. Comparables use market multiples, which might lie in ranges with a different multiple

67

---

Table of Contents

for each comparable. The selection of where within the range the appropriate multiple falls requires judgment, considering both quantitative and qualitative factors specific to the measurement. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities.

Income Approach—Income approach valuation techniques convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount, or a discounted amount. These techniques rely on current market expectations of future amounts.

Cost Approach—Cost approach valuation techniques are based upon the amount that, at present, would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset, or the current replacement cost. That is, from the perspective of a market participant (seller), the price that would be received for the asset is determined based on the cost to a market participant (buyer) to acquire or construct a substitute asset of comparable utility.

        The three approaches described within SFAS 157 are consistent with generally accepted valuation methodologies. While all three approaches are not applicable to all assets or liabilities accounted for at fair value, where appropriate and possible, one or more valuation techniques may be used. The selection of the valuation method(s) to apply considers the definition of an exit price and the nature of the asset or liability being valued and significant expertise and judgment is required. For assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value, valuation techniques are generally a combination of the market and income approaches. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the application of valuation techniques applied to similar assets and liabilities has been consistent.

        During the first half of 2008, our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis reflected as Level 3 decreased largely as a result of the sale of a CMBS totaling $2.2 million, principal repayments of CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS totaling $6.9 million and spread widening on our CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS. The significant amount of our available for sale securities reflected as Level 3 is a result of the reduction of liquidity in the capital markets that resulted in a decrease in the observability of the significant inputs used in determining fair value.

        During the first half of 2008, our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis reflected as Level 3 decreased by $88.0 million, largely as a result of spread widening on our collateralized debt obligations. The significant amount of our collateralized debt obligations reflected as Level 3 is a result of the reduction of liquidity in the capital markets that resulted in a decrease in the observability of the significant inputs used in determining fair value.

        The following table summarizes the sources from which fair value was determined on our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that were classified as Level 3 as of June 30, 2008.

Other-than Temporary Impairments

        When the fair value of an available-for-sale security is less than its amortized cost for an extended period, we consider whether there is an other than temporary impairment in the value of the security. If, in our judgment, an other than temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the security is written down to the then-current fair value, and the unrealized loss is transferred from accumulated other

68

---

Table of Contents

comprehensive loss as an immediate reduction of current earnings (as if the loss had been realized in the period of other than temporary impairment). The determination of other than temporary impairment is a subjective process, and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing of loss realization.

        We consider the following factors when determining an other-than-temporary impairment for a security or investment:

•

The length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than the amortized cost;



•

The underlying fundamentals of the relevant market and the outlook for such market for the near future; and



•

Our intent to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

        Periodically, all available for sale securities are evaluated for other than temporary impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("SFAS 115"), Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets ("EITF 99-20") and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59, which has been codified as SAB Topic 5.M, Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("SAB 59"). An impairment that is an "other than temporary impairment" is a decline in the fair value of an investment below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate the decline will not be recovered over the investment's remaining life. Other than temporary impairments result in reducing the security's carrying value to its fair value through the statement of operations, which also creates a new carrying value for the investment. We compute a revised yield based on the future estimated cash flows as described in "—Revenue Recognition" above. Significant judgments are required in determining impairment, which include making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss assumptions and the changes in interest rates.

        The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is made at least quarterly. If we determine an impairment to be other than temporary we will need to realize a loss that would have an impact on future income. Under the guidance provided by SFAS 115, a security is impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost and we do not intend to hold that security until we recover its amortized cost or until its maturity. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded an impairment charge on 80 RMBS and 24 CMBS under EITF 99-20 totaling $38.3 million and for the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded an impairment charge on 63 RMBS and 23 CMBS under EITF 99-20 totaling $15.2 million. We determined these securities to be impaired under EITF 99-20 because of the decline in the projected yields related to changes in the cash flow assumptions, such as timing and prepayments, on the underlying assets. Under the provisions of EITF 99-20 and SAB 59, we recognized impairments totaling $47.2 million on 37 RMBS, 48 CMBS and two preferred stock investments during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and we recognized impairments totaling $3.1 million on ten RMBS, eight CMBS and two preferred stock investments during the three months ended June 30, 2008. These impairments are attributed to other than temporary declines in market values and are primarily a consequence of wider spreads affecting market values of the securities. As of June 30, 2008, we still owned 128 of the securities that we impaired during 2008.

Net Changes in Assets and Liabilities Under Fair Value Option

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities

69

---

Table of Contents

that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS 159 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2008, and had the following effect at adoption (dollars in thousands):

        In addition, we had $290.9 million of notional interest rate positions relating to our CDOs that no longer qualify for hedge accounting at the date of adoption. Starting in 2008, changes in fair value and net cash settlements are recorded in our statement of operations.

Commercial Real Estate

        Commercial properties held for investment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, upon acquisition, we allocate the purchase price to the components of the commercial properties acquired: the amount allocated to land is based on its estimated fair value; buildings and existing tenant improvements are recorded at depreciated replacement cost; above- and below-market in-place operating leases are determined based on the present value of the difference between the rents payable under the contractual terms of the leases and estimated market rents; lease origination costs for in-place operating leases are determined based on the estimated costs that would be incurred to put the existing leases in place under the same terms and conditions; and tenant relationships are measured based on the present value of the estimated avoided net costs if a tenant were to renew its lease at expiry, discounted by the probability of such renewal. Based on these estimates, we allocate the initial purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. As final information regarding fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation. The allocations are finalized within twelve months of the acquisition date.

        Depreciation on buildings is provided on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the properties to a maximum of 40 years. Depreciation is determined with reference to each rental property's carried value, remaining estimated useful life and residual value. Acquired tenant improvements, above- and below-market in-place operating leases and lease origination costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining terms of the leases. The value associated with acquired tenant relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the relationships. All other tenant improvements and re-leasing costs are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases to which they relate. Depreciation on buildings and amortization of deferred leasing costs and tenant improvements that are determined to be assets of the company are recorded in depreciation and amortization expense. All above- and below-market tenant leases and tenant relationships are amortized to revenue. Above- and below-market ground leases are amortized to commercial real estate expenses.

        Properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. For commercial properties, an impairment loss is recognized when a property's carrying value exceeds its undiscounted future net cash flow. The impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Projections of

70

---

Table of Contents

future cash flow take into account the specific business plan for each property and management's best estimate of the most probable set of economic conditions anticipated to prevail in the market.

        We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Accounting For Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

        Our policies permit us to enter into derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, currency swaps, interest rate caps and interest rate swap forwards, as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated with the benchmark rate on forecasted rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements, or hedged items, for a specified future time period. We currently intend to use interest rate derivative instruments to mitigate interest rate risk rather than to enhance returns.

        In the normal course of business, we use a variety of derivative instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. We require that hedging derivative instruments be effective in reducing the interest rate risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. This effectiveness is essential for qualifying for hedge accounting. Some derivative instruments are associated with an anticipated transaction. In those cases, hedge effectiveness criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying transaction occurs. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract.

        To determine the fair value of derivative instruments, we use a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. For the majority of financial instruments including most derivatives, long-term investments and long-term debt, standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option-pricing models, replacement cost, and termination cost are used to determine fair value. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.

        In the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes and limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives. To address exposure to interest rates, we use derivatives primarily to hedge the mark-to-market risk of our liabilities with respect to certain of our assets.

        SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended ("SFAS 133"), requires us to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If a derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. SFAS 133 may increase or decrease reported net income and stockholders' equity prospectively, depending on future changes in fair value.

        At June 30, 2008, we were a party to eight interest rate swaps and caps with a notional par value of approximately $558.5 million; the fair value of our net liability relating to interest rate swaps and caps was approximately $11.9 million, which is included in our derivative assets and derivative liabilities, and we had accrued interest payable of approximately $0.3 million on our interest rate swaps and caps at such date. We entered into these interest rate swaps and caps to seek to mitigate our interest rate risk for the specified future time period, which is defined as the term of the swap and cap contracts. Based upon the market value of these interest rate swap and cap contracts, our counterparties may request additional margin collateral or we may request additional collateral from our counterparties to ensure that an appropriate margin account balance is maintained at all times through the expiration of the contracts.

71

---

Table of Contents

        As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had two and eight credit default swaps ("CDS") with a notional par value of $20.0 million and $75.0 million that are reflected on our balance sheet as a derivative liability at their fair value of approximately $18.6 million and $32.9 million, respectively. The fair value of the CDS depends on a number of factors, primarily premium levels, which are dependent on interest rate spreads. The CDS contracts are valued either by an independent third party pricing service or by using internally developed and tested market-standard pricing models that calculate the net present value of differences between future premiums on currently quoted market CDS and the contractual future premiums on our CDS contracts. During the first quarter of 2008, we closed out six CDS on single names in an aggregate notional amount of $55.0 million, with a realized loss of approximately $30.2 million.

        We account for derivative and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133. SFAS 133 requires recognizing all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. We have no fair value hedges or hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.

        For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (for example, in "interest expense" when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with floating-rate debt). The remaining gain (loss) on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative changes in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in current earnings during the period of change. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in realized and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the current earnings during the period of change. Income and/or expense from interest rate swaps are recognized as a net adjustment to interest expense. We account for income and expense from interest rate swaps on an accrual basis over the period to which the payment and/or receipt relates.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make a significant number of estimates in the preparation of the financial statements. These estimates include determining the fair market value of certain investments and derivative liabilities, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment assumptions, allocation of purchase price to tangible and intangible assets on property acquisitions, and other items that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes in these estimates (e.g., market values change due to changes in supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments, interest rates, or other reasons; yields change due to changes in credit outlook and loan prepayments) will occur in the near future. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from our estimates and differences may be material.

Income Taxes

        We operate in a manner that we believe will allow us to be taxed as a REIT and, as a result, we do not expect to pay substantial corporate-level income taxes. Many of the requirements for REIT qualification, however, are highly technical and complex. If we were to fail to meet these requirements and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we would be subject to federal income tax,

72

---

Table of Contents

which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and amounts available for distributions to our stockholders. In addition, Crystal River TRS Holdings, Inc., our TRS, is subject to corporate-level income taxes.

        Our policy for interest and penalties on material uncertain tax positions recognized in our consolidated financial statements is to classify these as interest expense and operating expense, respectively. However, in accordance with Financial Interpretation Number 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes ("FIN 48"), we assessed our tax positions for all open tax years (Federal, years 2005 through 2007 and State, years 2005 through 2007) as of June 30, 2008 and concluded that we have no material FIN 48 liabilities to be recognized at this time.

Financial Condition

Assets

        Our current portfolio consists of commercial mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial real estate loan products, credit default swaps, and operating real estate. All of our assets at June 30, 2008 were acquired with the net proceeds of approximately $405.6 million from our March 2005 private offering of 17,400,000 shares of our common stock, the net proceeds of approximately $158.6 million from our August 2006 initial public offering of 7,500,000 shares of our common stock, the net proceeds of approximately $48.6 million from our March 2007 issuance of trust preferred securities and our use of leverage.

Mortgage-Backed Securities

        Our commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities comprise approximately 100% of our Available for Sale portfolio. We own these securities either directly on our balance sheet or in one of our two CDOs. We own the equity of each of the CDOs and it is through this equity investment that we participate in the investment performance of the portion of the Available for Sale portfolio that is owned by the CDOs. The commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities segment of our portfolio at June 30, 2008 is summarized below:

        As of June 30, 2008, the CMBS and RMBS in our portfolio purchased at a net premium or discount relative to their par value and our portfolio had a weighted average amortized cost of 28.8% and 15.7% of face amount, respectively. The CMBS and RMBS were valued below par at June 30, 2008 because we are investing in lower-rated bonds in the credit structure. There are no securities held at June 30, 2008 that are valued below their amortized cost, which is a security's original cost, as adjusted for the amortization of any discount or premium on the security, principal paydowns and any impairments or principal write-offs on the security.

73

---

Table of Contents

        Our MBS holdings were as follows at June 30, 2008 ($ in millions):

---

(1)

As of December 31, 2006.

(2)

Lowest rating of Moody's, S&P or Fitch.

(3)

Market yield is calculated on a loss adjusted basis (i.e., taking into account assumed defaults).

(4)

Loss-adjusted weighted average remaining life in years.

        The estimated weighted average lives of the MBS in the tables above are based upon our prepayment expectations, which are based on both proprietary and subscription-based financial models.

        Our prepayment projections consider current and expected trends in interest rates, interest rate volatility, steepness of the yield curve, the mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, time to reset and the spread margin of the reset.

        The table below summarizes the credit ratings of our MBS investments at June 30, 2008:

        Actual maturities of MBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities, as they are affected by the contractual lives of the underlying mortgages, periodic payments of principal, and prepayments of principal. The stated contractual final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying our portfolio of MBS ranges up to 30 years, but the expected maturity is subject to change based on the

74

---

Table of Contents

prepayments of the underlying loans. As of June 30, 2008, the average final contractual maturity of the mortgage portfolio is 2037.

        The constant prepayment rate, or CPR, attempts to predict the percentage of principal that will be prepaid over the next 12 months based on historical principal paydowns. As interest rates rise, the rate of refinancings typically declines, which we believe may result in lower rates of prepayment and, as a result, a lower portfolio CPR.

        The following table summarizes our CMBS and RMBS according to their estimated weighted average life classifications as of June 30, 2008:

        The estimated weighted-average lives of the MBS in the tables above are based upon prepayment models obtained through subscription-based financial information service providers. The prepayment model considers current yield, forward yield, steepness of the yield curve, current mortgage rates, the mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, loan age, margin and volatility.

        The actual weighted average lives of the MBS in our investment portfolio could be longer or shorter than the estimates in the table above depending on the actual prepayment rates experienced over the lives of the applicable securities and are sensitive to changes in both prepayment rates and interest rates.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

        Our CMBS portfolio consists of CMBS that we own directly and CMBS that are owned by one of our CDOs. We directly own approximately $56.3 million in fair value of CMBS. These securities have a weighted average rating of CCC-, are priced at a weighted average price to par of 19.1%, and are projected to yield 22.15% on a loss-adjusted basis. Approximately 79.4% of the CMBS that we own directly is part of a portfolio that we refer to as the "CMBS Primary Asset." The CMBS Primary Asset is a sub-portfolio that consists of our holdings in 11 CMBS securitizations in which we, either directly or through one of our CDOs, own a portion of the first loss tranche. The CMBS Primary Asset is further illustrated below.

        Within our two CDOs, we own approximately $185.4 million in fair value of CMBS. These securities have a weighted average rating of BB-, are priced at a weighted average price to par of 35.4%, and are projected to yield 19.66% on a loss-adjusted basis. However, the receipt of cash flows from this portion of our CMBS portfolio is governed by the waterfalls within the respective CDO indentures, which are further described below. Approximately 55% of the CMBS that we own within our two CDOs are part of the CMBS Primary Asset.

75

---

Table of Contents

CMBS Primary Asset

        The following table sets forth some relevant characteristics of our CMBS Primary Asset.

---

(1)

A deal's detachment point is the senior limit to our credit exposure within that securitization.

        The following table sets forth some relevant characteristics of our CMBS portfolio by vintage.

---

(1)

Weighted average determined based on outstanding face amounts owned.

(2)

Delinquencies in the securitization; weighted average determined based on outstanding face amounts owned.

(3)

Write-offs of par on the securities we own; weighted average determined based on original face amounts owned.

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities

        Our RMBS portfolio consists of RMBS that we own directly and RMBS that are owned by one of our CDOs. We directly own approximately $24.0 million in value of RMBS, which consists of $18.2 million of prime RMBS and $5.8 million of sub-prime RMBS. The prime bonds have a weighted average rating of CCC+, are priced at a weighted average price to par of 16.2%, and are projected to yield 66.81% on a loss-adjusted basis. The sub-prime bonds have a weighted average rating of CCC, are

76

---

Table of Contents

priced at a weighted average price to par of 9.2%, and are projected to yield 55.01% on a loss-adjusted basis.

        Within our two CDOs, we own approximately $30.1 million in value of RMBS, which consists of $19.6 million of prime RMBS and $10.5 million of sub-prime RMBS. The prime bonds have a weighted average rating of B+, are priced at a weighted average price to par of 20.8%, and are projected to yield 54.63% on a loss-adjusted basis. The sub-prime bonds have a weighted average rating of CCC+, are priced at a weighted average price to par of 14.2%, and are projected to yield 56.04% on a loss-adjusted basis. However, the receipt of cash flows from this portion of our RMBS portfolio is governed by the waterfalls within the respective CDO indentures, which are further described below.

        The following table sets forth some relevant characteristics of our prime RMBS portfolio by vintage.

---

(1)

Weighted average determined based on outstanding face amount owned.

(2)

Delinquencies in the securitization, weighted average determined based on outstanding face amounts owned.

(3)

Write-offs of par on the securities we own; weighted average determined based on original face amounts owned.

77

---

Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth some relevant characteristics of our sub-prime RMBS by vintage.

---

(1)

Weighted average determined based on outstanding face amount owned.

(2)

Represents the weighted average excess spread over the applicable liability coupon for the month of June 2008, weighted by par amount.

(3)

Delinquencies in the securitization; weighted average determined based on outstanding face amounts owned.

(4)

Write-offs of par on the securities we own; weighted average determined based on original face amounts owned.

Equity Securities

        Our investment policies allow us to acquire equity securities, including common and preferred shares issued by other real estate investment trusts. At June 30, 2008, we held two investments in equity securities, totaling less than $0.1 million. These investments are classified as available for sale and thus carried at fair value on our balance sheet with changes in fair value recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income until realized or determined to be other than temporarily impaired.

78

---

Table of Contents

Changes in Carrying Value of Available for Sale Securities

        The following sets forth information regarding the changes in the carrying value of our available for sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2008:

        The following sets forth information regarding the changes in the carrying value of our available for sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2007:

Commercial Real Estate Loan Products

        At June 30, 2008, our commercial real estate loan products are reported as held for investment (carried at amortized cost) and held for sale (carried at fair value). Real estate loans that are held for investment are periodically reviewed for impairment. As of June 30, 2008, we reported loans held for sale totaling $47.5 million and loans held for investment totaling $24.4 million. As of June 30, 2008, we

79

---

Table of Contents

recorded a loan loss reserve on one of our commercial real estate loans of $7.5 million. Our commercial real estate loan products as of June 30, 2008 are summarized below:

Mezzanine Loans, Construction Loans and Whole Loans

---

(1)

Construction loans amount excludes $7.5 million of loan loss allowance.

        In 2005, we originated a $9.5 million mezzanine construction loan to develop luxury residential condominiums in Portland, Oregon. In September 2007, we entered into an agreement with the borrower and the senior lender to increase both the mezzanine construction loan and the senior loan that required additional capital contributions from the project equity holder to cover the remaining costs to complete the project. The mezzanine construction loan bears interest at an annual rate of 16% and had a maturity date of November 2007, which was subsequently extended until May 2008. Under the amended agreement governing the terms of the loan, interest on the loan was paid in cash through March 2006, was capitalized through September 2007, and was contracted to be paid in cash through May 2008 under the terms of the amendment. The loan was placed on non-accrual status as of January 1, 2008 as we have received no interest payments during the six months ended June 30, 2008. We made additional advances during the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $0.1 million.

        In May 2008, the senior and mezzanine construction loans were further amended to limit the borrower's exposure under a personal guaranty established in connection with the original loan agreements if the borrower makes additional equity contributions totaling $1.5 million and finishes construction of the remaining townhome units. In addition, the borrower surrendered all decision-making authority (including the authority to establish the prices at which the remaining units are marketed and sold) to the senior and mezzanine lenders. Our maximum exposure to loss under this agreement as of June 30, 2008 totaled $6.3 million.

        The financing structures that we offer to the borrowers on certain of our loans involve the creation of entities that could be deemed VIEs and therefore, could be subject to FIN 46R. The September 2007 agreement to provide additional financing discussed above triggered a reconsideration event under FIN 46R. This loan was determined to be a VIE upon entering into the first amendment in September 2007; however, we concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary. Upon executing the May 2008 amendment, we accounted for this loan as a troubled debt restructuring under SFAS 15 and SFAS 114.

        We have evaluated the financial merits of the project by reviewing the projected unit sales and estimated construction costs and evaluating other collateral available to us (and the expected cost of realizing any recovery on that collateral) under the terms of the loan. We believe that it is probable that we will not recover the entire loan balance, including the capitalized interest, through the

80

---

Table of Contents

satisfaction of future cash flows from sales and other available collateral. Accordingly, based on our analysis, we recorded a provision for loan loss of $4.5 million related to this loan during the year ended December 31, 2007 and an additional provision for loan loss of $0.5 million and $3.0 million related to this loan during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, due to the failure of the closure of pending condominium sales, combined with currently declining condominium sale prices in the Portland, Oregon area. We will continue to monitor the status of this loan. However, housing prices, in particular condominium prices, may continue to fall, unit sales may continue to lag projections and construction costs may continue to increase, all of which may increase the risk that we will realize additional losses on this loan. No assurance can be given that we will not be required to record additional loan loss reserves with respect to this loan in the future depending on the borrower's ability to complete the project without additional cost overruns. In the event that we determine that it is probable that we will not be able to recover the current carrying value of this loan, additional loan loss reserves will be recorded.

        Currently, the projected total costs to complete the project have increased from $41.4 million to $59.7 million, including capitalized interest. As of June 30, 2008, of the 70 units available, 37 units have been sold.

        As of June 30, 2008, we have committed to sell, or we have the intent and ability to sell in the near future, two of our commercial whole loans and two of our mezzanine loans with an aggregate carrying value of $47.5 million.

Operating Real Estate

        At June 30, 2008, our commercial real estate portfolio is reported at cost of approximately $239.5 million, net of accumulated depreciation of approximately $8.0 million. The commercial real estate portfolio consists of three high-quality office buildings that are 100% leased on a triple-net basis to JPMorgan Chase. The buildings are financed with long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans.

        The tables below summarize our commercial real estate investments at June 30, 2008:

 

---

(1)

Book value includes intangible assets and intangible liabilities, but excludes rent-enhancement receivables.

81

---

Table of Contents

Interest and Principal Paydown Receivable

        At June 30, 2008, we had interest and principal paydown receivables of approximately $4.7 million. The total interest and principal paydown receivable amount consisted of approximately $4.3 million relating to our MBS and approximately $0.4 million relating to other investments.

Credit Default Swaps, Hedging Instruments and Other Derivative Activities

        As of June 30, 2008, we had engaged in credit default swaps, or CDS, which are accounted for as derivatives. CDS are derivative securities that attempt to replicate the credit risk involved with owning a particular unrelated third party security, which we refer to as a reference obligation. We enter into CDS on three types of securities: RMBS, CMBS and the CMBX and ABX indices. Investing in assets through CDS subjects us to additional risks. When we enter into a CDS with respect to an asset, we do not have any legal or beneficial interest in the reference obligation but have only a contractual relationship with the counterparty, typically a broker-dealer or other financial institution, and do not have the benefit of any collateral or other security or remedies that would be available to holders of the reference obligation or the right to receive information regarding the underlying obligors or issuers of the reference obligation. In addition, in the event of insolvency of a CDS counterparty, we would be treated as a general creditor of the counterparty to the extent the counterparty does not post collateral and, therefore, we may be subject to significant counterparty credit risk. As of June 30, 2008, we were party to CDS with one counterparty. CDS are relatively new instruments, the terms of which may contain ambiguous provisions that are subject to interpretation, with consequences that could be adverse to us.

        Currently, we are the seller of protection. The seller of protection through CDS is exposed to those risks associated with owning the underlying reference obligation. The seller, however, does not receive periodic interest payments, but instead it receives periodic premium payments for assuming the credit risk of the reference obligation. These risks are called "credit events" and generally consist of failure to pay principal, failure to pay interest, write-downs, implied write-downs and distressed ratings downgrades of the reference obligation.

        For some CDS, upon the occurrence of a credit event with respect to a reference obligation, the buyer of protection may have the option to deliver the reference obligation to the seller of protection in part or in whole at par or to elect cash settlement. In this event, should the buyer of protection elect cash settlement for a credit event that has occurred, it will trigger a payment, the amount of which is based on the proportional amount of failure or write-down. In the case of a distressed ratings downgrade, the buyer of protection must deliver the reference obligation to the seller of protection, and there is no cash settlement option. In most cases, however, the CDS is a PAUG (pay as you go) CDS, in which case, at the point a write-down or an interest shortfall occurs, the protection seller pays the protection buyer a cash amount, and the contract remains outstanding until such time as the reference obligation has a factor of zero. In most of these instances, it will create a loss for the protection seller.

        As of June 30, 2008, we were a party to two CDS with maturities ranging from June 2035 to October 2042 with a notional par amount of $20.0 million. At June 30, 2008, the fair value of our net liability relating to credit default swap contracts was $18.6 million, compared to a net liability of $32.9 million at December 31, 2007, primarily as a result of our closing out six credit default swaps with a notional par amount of $55.0 million during the first quarter of 2008, offset in part by an increase in the credit spreads of the CDS. During the first quarter of 2008, we closed out six CDS on single names in an aggregate notional amount of $55.0 million, with a realized loss of approximately $30.2 million, of which $19.8 million had been accrued at December 31, 2007. As of June 30, 2008 and August 8, 2008, we had approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of potential exposure to margin calls with respect to our CDS.

82

---

Table of Contents

        There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, no hedging activity can completely insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates and prepayment rates. We generally intend to hedge as much of the interest rate risk as Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River determines is in the best interests of our stockholders, after considering the cost of such hedging transactions and our desire to maintain our status as a REIT. Our policies do not contain specific requirements as to the percentages or amount of interest rate risk that our Manager is required to hedge.

        As of June 30, 2008, we had engaged in interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated with repurchase agreements for a specified future time period, which is the term of the swap or cap contract. An interest rate swap is a contractual agreement entered into by two counterparties under which each agrees to make periodic payments to the other for an agreed period of time based upon a notional amount of principal. Under the most common form of interest rate swap, a series of payments calculated by applying a fixed rate of interest to a notional amount of principal is exchanged for a stream of payments similarly calculated but using a floating rate of interest. This is a fixed-floating interest rate swap. We hedge our floating rate debt by entering into fixed-floating interest rate swap agreements whereby we swap the floating rate of interest on the liability we are hedging for a fixed rate of interest. An interest rate swap forward is an interest rate swap based on an interest rate to be set at an agreed future date. As of June 30, 2008, we were a party to interest rate swaps and caps with maturities ranging from June 2008 to April 2020 with a notional par amount of approximately $558.5 million. Under the swap agreements in place at June 30, 2008, we receive interest at rates that reset periodically, generally every three months, and pay a rate fixed at the initiation of and for the life of the swap agreements. The current market value of interest rate swaps is heavily dependent on the current market fixed rate, the corresponding term structure of floating rates (known as the yield curve) as well as the expectation of changes in future floating rates. As expectations of future floating rates change, the market value of interest rate swaps changes. Based on the daily market value of those interest rate swaps and interest rate swap forward contracts, our counterparties may request additional margin collateral or we may request additional collateral from our counterparties to ensure that an appropriate margin account balance is maintained at all times through the maturity of the contracts. At June 30, 2008, the net realized and unrealized loss on interest rate swap and cap contracts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss was $11.6 million due to an increase in prevailing market interest rates.

Liabilities

        Our liabilities as of June 30, 2008 consist of $60.5 million in short-term liabilities and $499.9 million in long-term liabilities that are matched to the assets that the liabilities finance. Of our long-term liabilities, $204.8 million is the fair value of the rated notes that were issued in conjunction with our two CDOs. The remainder of the $295.1 million of our long-term liabilities consists of $219.4 million of mortgages payable used to finance our commercial real estate properties, $24.1 million of senior mortgage-backed notes used to finance some of our whole loans, and $51.6 million of junior subordinated notes issued to a trust that sold trust preferred securities. Our $60.5 million of short term liabilities consists of $22.1 million of borrowings under various repurchase facilities and $38.4 million of borrowings under our secured revolving funding line. The repurchase

83

---

Table of Contents

facilities have 30-day rolling maturities, while the financing line matures in May 2009. During the first half of 2008, we reduced the amount of our liabilities, as illustrated in the following chart:

        We have entered into repurchase agreements to finance some of our purchases of available for sale securities and real estate loans. These agreements are secured by our available for sale securities and real estate loans and bear interest rates that have historically moved in close relationship to LIBOR. As of June 30, 2008, we had established numerous borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders. As of June 30, 2008, we were utilizing six of those arrangements.

        At June 30, 2008, we had outstanding obligations under repurchase agreements with five counterparties totaling approximately $22.1 million with weighted average current borrowing rates of 4.28%, all of which have maturities of between one and 24 days. We intend to seek to renew these repurchase agreements as they mature under the then-applicable borrowing terms of the counterparties to the repurchase agreements. At June 30, 2008, the repurchase agreements were secured by available for sale securities with an estimated fair value of approximately $58.1 million and had weighted average maturities of four days. The net amount at risk, defined as fair value of the collateral, including restricted cash, minus repurchase agreement liabilities and accrued interest expense, with all counterparties was approximately $37.4 million at June 30, 2008.

        At June 30, 2008, our wholly-owned subsidiary, CRZ ABCP Financing LLC, had outstanding $24.1 million of senior mortgage-backed notes that were held by an affiliate of our Manager. The senior mortgage-backed notes are collateralized by commercial whole mortgage loans. These senior mortgage-backed notes were issued to an affiliate of our Manager in the aggregate principal amount of $101.5 million with floating coupons with varying interest rate spreads over the three-month LIBOR rate. The holder of the senior mortgage-backed notes has the ability to charge us to the extent that its cost of funding exceeds the interest rate paid on the senior mortgage-backed notes. Interest on the senior mortgage-backed notes is payable monthly. The senior mortgage-backed notes mature in April 2017 and the outstanding principal is due at maturity. Early repayments of the underlying mortgage loans require repayment of a portion of the senior mortgage-backed notes. The senior mortgage-backed notes are treated as a secured financing, and are non recourse to us. Proceeds from the sale of the senior mortgage-backed notes issued were used to repay outstanding debt under our repurchase agreements. In July 2008, CRZ ABCP Financing sold two commercial whole loans and used the proceeds to fully repay all of the senior mortgage-backed notes.

        At June 30, 2008, we had $51.6 million of junior subordinated notes outstanding. The junior subordinated notes are the sole assets owned by our subsidiary trust, Crystal River Preferred Trust I,

84

---

Table of Contents

and mature in April 2037. We have the right to redeem these notes at par on or after April 2012. Interest is payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.68% (ten-year LIBOR plus 2.75%) through April 2012 and thereafter at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%.

        At June 30, 2008, we had $219.4 million of mortgage loans outstanding with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.58% that are secured by our commercial properties located in Houston, Texas; Phoenix, Arizona; and Arlington, Texas.

        At June 30, 2008, we had $38.4 million of borrowings outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility with an affiliate of our Manager that provides for borrowings of up to $100.0 million in the aggregate and expires in May 2009. The secured facility bears interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. At June 30, 2008, we had pledged $37.8 million of assets as collateral under this facility.

CDO Liabilities

        We have issued two CDOs. Our first CDO, which we refer to as CDO I, closed in 2005, and our second CDO, which refer to as CDO II, was priced in late 2006 and closed in early 2007. For each CDO, we sold a certain amount of senior notes, as illustrated in the chart below, to third party investors and retained all of the junior notes. For CDO I, we retained approximately $146.5 million par amount of junior securities (representing the Class E notes through equity), and for CDO II, we retained approximately $65.5 million par amount of junior securities (representing the Class J notes through equity). The notes issued by each of the CDOs is governed by an indenture, which is administered by a trustee. The indentures each prescribe a "cash flow waterfall" that dictates how the receipt of principal and interest received from the underlying collateral securing the notes is allocated to the various classes of issued notes, including the junior notes that we own. Generally speaking, our rights to cash flows pursuant to these waterfalls are subordinate in right to the senior classes. Additionally, CDO I has additional protections for the benefit of the holders of the senior notes, which require that the underlying pool of securities be in compliance with various performance criteria, commonly referred to as "performance triggers," or simply "Triggers". If the Triggers are in compliance, then the cash flow waterfalls are unaffected; if the Triggers are out of compliance, then cash flow to certain junior notes is diverted to accelerate the amortization of the senior notes, until such time as the Triggers come back into compliance. The Triggers for CDO I are illustrated in the chart below. CDO II does not contain any Triggers, but it does have a traditional waterfall.

        Beginning in June 2008, CDO I began to fail the Class F over-collateralization Trigger. During this period of failure, all notes below the Class F will not receive their quarterly interest payments. However, the Class F does receive its regular distributions in the event of a Class F over-collateralization Trigger failure. The money that otherwise would be paid to the classes subordinate to the Class F notes are used instead to pay down the principal balance of the senior-most notes. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we received $2.6 million in cash receipts pursuant to our ownership of the Class E notes through the equity of CDO I, as illustrated below:

85

---

Table of Contents

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we received $2.1 million in cash receipts pursuant to our ownership of the Class J notes through the equity of CDO II, as illustrated below:

        A summary of the terms of our two CDOs as of June 30, 2008 is set forth below:

---

(1)

Excludes the non-investment grade notes and preference shares that we retained.

(2)

Collateral composition amounts are based on par value, which is the metric used to calculate whether the triggers pass or fail.

86

---

Table of Contents

---

(1)

Weighted average spread over LIBOR on the investment grade notes that we did not retain.

Stockholders' Equity

        Stockholders' equity at June 30, 2008 was approximately $60.9 million and included $1.9 million of net unrealized holdings gains on securities available for sale and $11.6 million of net unrealized and realized losses on interest rate agreements accounted for as cash flow hedges presented as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Results of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007

Summary

        Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $213.2 million or $8.60 per weighted average basic and diluted share outstanding, compared with a net loss of $1.5 million or $0.06 per weighted average basic and diluted share outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net loss increased by $211.7 million from the first two quarters of 2007 to the first two quarters of 2008.

87

---

Table of Contents

Revenues

        The following table sets forth information regarding our revenues:

        Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 with respect to CMBS increased $6.8 million, or 33.2%, over interest income for the same period in 2007 because of the higher accretion of discount on CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS contained in our investment portfolio during the 2008 period as a result of impairments taken against those investments during 2007 and 2008. Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 with respect to Agency MBS, Non-Agency RMBS and real estate loans decreased $41.0 million, or 71.6%, $0.6 million, or 2.8%, and $3.9 million, or 44.8%, respectively, over the same period in 2007 because we had fewer investments in those asset classes during the first two quarters of 2008. Interest income on real estate loans was also lower due to principal paydowns and the presence of significantly lower interest rates compared to the same period in 2007. Other interest and dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $4.0 million, or 81.6%, due to lower interest income earned on restricted cash balances during the 2008 period and a decrease in dividends from our preferred stock investments during the 2008 period. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, rental income from our commercial property investments increased $5.5 million, or 96.5%, over rental income for the same period in 2007 because we initially made our investments in commercial properties late in March 2007 and the 2008 amounts reflect rental income for the entire six month period. In addition, we acquired a real estate property on September 25, 2007, which increase rental income in 2008.

        Of the $81.2 million in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008, $69.0 million was received in cash and $12.2 million was non-cash revenue from the accretion of discounts on bonds purchased at prices below their par value, compared to $112.5 million and $7.9 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in non-cash revenue over the 2007 period was caused by a decrease in the book value of our available for sale portfolio as a result of impairments that we have taken over the last year.

88

---

Table of Contents

Expenses

        The following table sets forth information regarding our total expenses:

        Interest expense relating to repurchase agreements, including with related parties, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $53.7 million, or 81.1%, over the same period in 2007 because of lower repurchase agreement borrowings related to Agency MBS as a result of our sale during 2007 and March 2008 of approximately $2.1 billion of Agency MBS. Interest expense relating to CDO notes for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $4.7 million, or 32.4%, over the same period in 2007 as a result of CDO principal repayments during 2007 and the first two quarters of 2008 and due to lower interest rates on our floating rate CDO notes in 2008 than in 2007. Interest income from interest rate swaps for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $5.6 million, or 121.7%, over the same period in 2007 because interest rates were lower in the 2008 period than in the 2007 period and because we had lower notional amount of interest rate swaps in place during the 2008 period. In addition, we no longer receive hedge accounting on our interest rate swaps in our CDO structures, due to our election to mark our CDO liabilities to market in accordance with FAS 159. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, interest expense relating to junior subordinated notes, mortgages payable and senior mortgage-backed notes, related party, increased $0.9 million, or 81.8%, $2.9 million, or 90.6% and $0.6 million, or 54.5%, respectively, over the same period in 2007 as we first utilized these financing sources commencing midway through the 2007 period. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we also had interest expense relating to secured revolving credit facility, related party, totaling $1.7 million as we first utilized this financing source commencing late in 2007.

89

---

Table of Contents

        Expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 also included base management fees, incentive fees and amortization related to restricted stock and options granted to our Manager totaling approximately $1.1 million. Expenses for the same period in 2007 also included base management fees and incentive fees of approximately $3.8 million and amortization of approximately $0.5 million related to restricted stock and options granted to our Manager. Management fee expenses decreased primarily due to the $345.9 million net loss in 2007 and the $213.2 million net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008, which reduced the management fee for the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we had depreciation and amortization expense of $6.0 million and commercial real estate expenses of $0.8 million relating to our commercial property investments, compared to $3.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively for the same period in 2007, because we acquired our first commercial properties in March 2007. We also incurred a $3.0 million loan loss relating to one of our construction loans and a $13.4 million charge relating to our designating certain of our commercial whole loans and mezzanine loans as loans held for sale during the six months ended June 30, 2008.

        Our Manager has waived its right to request reimbursement from us of third-party expenses that it incurred through June 30, 2008, which amount otherwise would have been required to be reimbursed. The management agreement with Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River, which was negotiated before our business model was implemented, provides that we will reimburse our Manager for certain third party expenses that it incurs on our behalf, including rent and utilities. Hyperion Brookfield incurs such costs and did not allocate any such expenses to our Manager in 2005, 2006 or 2007 as our Manager's use of such services was deemed to be immaterial. Hyperion Brookfield currently is determining the amount of such rent and utility costs that will be allocated to our Manager commencing July 1, 2008, and we will be responsible for reimbursing such costs allocable to our operations absent any further waiver of reimbursement by our Manager. There are no contractual limitations on our obligation to reimburse our Manager for third party expenses and our Manager may incur such expenses consistent with the grant of authority provided to it pursuant to the management agreement without any additional approval of our board of directors being required. In addition, our Manager may defer our reimbursement obligation from any quarter to a future period; provided, however, that we will record any necessary accrual for any such reimbursement obligations when required by U.S. GAAP, and our Manager has advised us that it will promptly invoice us for such reimbursements consistent with sound financial accounting policies.

Other Revenues (Expenses)

        Other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaled approximately $231.3 million, compared with other expenses of $27.6 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $203.7 million, or 738.0%. Other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 consisted primarily of $38.0 million of realized and unrealized loss on derivatives, primarily as a result of realized and unrealized losses on CDS of $15.9 million, realized losses on settlement of interest rate swaps of $18.3 million, unrealized losses on hedge ineffectiveness of $12.7 million and $8.7 million in unrealized losses on economic hedges undesignated, $5.0 million of realized net loss on the sale of securities available for sale, real estate loans and other investments, a $102.2 million recognized loss relating to net changes in the values of assets and liabilities carried under the fair value option of SFAS 159, and a $85.5 million loss on impairment of securities available for sale, which was comprised of a $38.3 million impairment relating to CMBS, Non-Agency RMBS and preferred stock investments, which was caused by adverse changes in cash flow assumptions, and a $47.2 million impairment caused by an other than temporary decline in market values due to spread widening. Other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 consisted primarily of $12.2 million of realized and unrealized loss on derivatives, primarily as a result of realized and unrealized losses on CDS of $8.3 million, and a $22.7 million loss on impairments of securities available for sale, which was comprised of a $9.3 million impairment relating to Agency MBS that we no longer intended to hold to maturity or until the recovery of our cost and a $13.4 million impairment relating to Non-Agency RMBS, of which $7.7 million was caused

90

---

Table of Contents

by adverse changes in cash flow assumptions and of which $5.7 million was caused by an other than temporary decline in market values due to spread widening. This was offset in part by $1.2 million of realized net gain on the sale of securities available for sale and real estate loans, $1.4 million of income from equity investments and $4.8 million of foreign currency exchange gain.

Income Tax Expense

        We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Section 856(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the tax year ended December 31, 2005. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax. To maintain qualification as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders and meet certain other requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We may also be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property. Under certain circumstances, federal income and excise taxes may be due on our undistributed taxable income.

        At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we were in compliance with all REIT requirements and, accordingly, have not provided for income tax expense on our REIT taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2007 or for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We also have a domestic taxable REIT subsidiary that is subject to tax at regular corporate rates. The deferred tax benefit is attributable to the mark to market adjustments for net operating loss deductions, credit default swaps, and accrued management fees associated with our investment in a private equity fund held in the TRS.

        As of June 30, 2008, we recorded a $14.9 million valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $14.9 million attributable to income tax net operating loss carryforward and capital loss carryforward relating to our TRS. The valuation allowance is based on management's estimate that our TRS is not expected to generate sufficient taxable income to recover the deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2008, we had net operating loss carryforward and capital loss carryforward of approximately $0 million and $32.6 million, respectively. The net operating loss carryforward expires in 2027 and the capital loss carryforward expires in 2012.

Results of Operations For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2007

Summary

        Our net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $75.5 million or $3.04 per weighted average basic and diluted share outstanding, compared with a net loss of $9.1 million or $0.36 per weighted average basic and diluted share outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net loss increased by $66.4 million from the 2007 quarter to the 2008 quarter.

91

---

Table of Contents

Revenues

        The following table sets forth information regarding our revenues:

        Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 with respect to CMBS increased $2.8 million, or 26.2%, over interest income for the same period in 2007 because of the higher accretion of discount on CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS contained in our investment portfolio during the 2008 quarter as a result of impairments taken against those investments during 2007 and 2008. Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 with respect to Agency MBS, Non-Agency RMBS and real estate loans decreased $10.7 million, or 89.9%, $17.6 million, or 64.7%, and $2.2 million, or 50.0%, respectively, over the same period in 2007 because we had fewer investments in those asset classes during the 2008 quarter. Other interest and dividend income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $2.1 million, or 91.3%, due to lower interest income earned on restricted cash balances during the 2008 quarter and a decrease in dividends from our preferred stock investments during the 2008 quarter. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, rental income from our commercial property investments increased $0.5 million, or 9.8%, over rental income for the same period in 2007 because we made an additional investment in commercial properties in September 2007.

        Of the $32.3 million in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008, $27.7 million was received in cash and $4.6 million was non-cash revenue from the accretion of discounts on bonds purchased at prices below their par value, compared to $57.9 million and $4.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in non-cash revenue over the 2007 period was caused by a decrease in the book value of our available for sale portfolio as a result of impairments that we have taken over the last year.

92

---

Table of Contents

Expenses

        The following table sets forth information regarding our total expenses:

        Interest expense relating to repurchase agreements, including with related parties, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $30.4 million, or 97.1%, over the same period in 2007 because of lower repurchase agreement borrowings related to Agency MBS as a result of our sale during 2007 and March 2008 of approximately $2.1 billion of Agency MBS. Interest expense relating to CDO notes for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $3.6 million, or 46.8%, over the same period in 2007 as a result of CDO principal repayments during 2007 and the first two quarters of 2008 and due to lower interest rates on our floating rate CDO notes in 2008 than in 2007. Interest expense from interest rate swaps for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased $2.2 million, or 129.4%, over the same period in 2007 because interest rates were lower in the 2008 quarter than in 2007 quarter and because we had lower notional amount of interest rate swaps in place during the 2008 quarter. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we also had interest expense relating to our secured revolving credit facility, related party, totaling $0.5 million as we first utilized this financing source commencing late in 2007.

        Expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 also included base management fees and amortization related to restricted stock and options granted to our Manager totaling approximately $0.4 million. Expenses for the same period in 2007 also included base management fees of approximately $1.7 million and amortization of approximately $0.1 million related to restricted stock

93

---

Table of Contents

and options granted to our Manager. Management fee expenses decreased primarily due to the $345.9 million net loss in 2007 and the $213.2 million net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008, which reduced the management fee for the first quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, for the three months ended June 30, 2008, we had depreciation and amortization expense of $3.0 million and commercial real estate expenses of $0.4 million relating to our commercial property investments, compared to $2.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively for the same period in 2007, because we acquired an additional commercial property in September 2007. We also incurred a $0.5 million loan loss relating to one of our construction loans and a $6.9 million charge relating to our designating certain of our commercial whole loans as loans held for sale during the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Other Revenues (Expenses)

        Other expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 totaled approximately $83.8 million, compared with other expenses of $21.5 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $62.3 million, or 289.8%. Other expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 consisted primarily of $5.4 million of realized and unrealized gain on derivatives, primarily as a result of a $14.5 million increase in unrealized gain on economic hedges, offset in part by realized and unrealized losses on CDS of $3.4 million, realized losses on settlement of interest rate swaps of $5.8 million and unrealized losses on hedge ineffectiveness and undesignation of $1.2 million. In addition, we had $1.3 million of realized net loss on the sale of securities available for sale, real estate loans and other investments, a $69.4 million recognized loss relating to net changes in the values of assets and liabilities carried under the fair value option of SFAS 159, and a $18.3 million loss on impairment of securities available for sale, which was comprised of a $15.2 million impairment relating to CMBS, Non-Agency RMBS and preferred stock investments, which was caused by adverse changes in cash flow assumptions and a $3.1 million impairment caused by an other than temporary decline in market values due to spread widening. Other expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2007 consisted primarily of $3.6 million of realized and unrealized loss on derivatives, primarily as a result of realized and unrealized losses on CDS of $4.8 million, and a $22.1 million loss on impairments of securities available for sale, which was comprised of a $9.3 million impairment relating to Agency MBS that we no longer intended to hold to maturity or until the recovery of our cost and a $12.8 million impairment relating to Non-Agency RMBS, of which $7.1 million was caused by adverse changes in cash flow assumptions and of which $5.7 million was caused by an other than temporary decline in market values due to spread widening. This was offset in part by $0.6 million of income from equity investments and $4.2 million of foreign currency exchange gain.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Capital is required to fund our investment activities and operating expenses. We believe we currently have sufficient access to capital resources and will continue to use a significant amount of our available capital resources to fund our existing business plan. Our capital resources include cash on hand, cash flow from operations, principal and interest payments received from investments, borrowings under credit facilities, reverse repurchase agreements, junior subordinated debenture issuances, and proceeds from stock offerings.

        We held cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7.8 million at June 30, 2008, which excludes restricted cash of approximately $27.6 million that is used to collateralize certain of our repurchase facilities ($4.1 million), interest rate swaps and caps ($1.7 million), CDS ($18.6 million) and certain other commercial real estate and financing obligations.

        Our operating activities provided net cash of approximately $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as a result of realized and unrealized loss on derivatives of $35.0 million, net changes in assets and liabilities carried under the fair value option of SFAS 159 of $102.2 million,

94

---

Table of Contents

non-cash impairment charges relating to available for sale securities of $85.5 million, provision for loan loss of $16.4 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $6.0 million, amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs of $0.9 million and a realized net loss on available for sale securities, real estate loans and other investments of $4.9 million. Operating activities provided further net cash from a net decrease in interest receivable of $7.3 million. This was offset in part by a net loss of $213.2 million and other non-cash activities, including accretion of a net discount on available for sale securities and real estate loans of $12.2 million and amortization of intangible liabilities of $2.7 million. The increase in cash was also further offset by a net decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and interest payable of $11.1 million, a net decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.5 million and $7.9 million of payments on the settlement of derivatives.

        Our operating activities provided net cash of approximately $18.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as a result of non-cash unrealized loss on derivatives of $13.9 million, non-cash impairment charges relating to available for sale securities of $22.7 million, change in deferred income tax of $0.9 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of stock based compensation and deferred financing costs and real estate assets of $5.1 million and an increase in the return on investment from equity investments of $2.1 million. This was offset in part by a net loss of $1.5 million, and other non cash activities, including accretion of a net discount on available for sale securities and real estate loans of $7.8 million, a gain on foreign currency translation of $4.6 million, amortization of intangible liabilities and deferred gains on derivatives of $1.4 million, a realized net gain on sale of available for sale securities of $1.1 million and income from equity investments of $1.4 million. The increase in cash was also further offset by a net decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, due to Manager and interest payable of $2.9 million, and a net increase in interest and rent receivable of $4.2 million.

        Our investing activities provided net cash of $1,354.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily from proceeds received from the sale of securities available for sale of $1,178.4 million, proceeds from the sale of real estate loans of $78.2 million, proceeds from the sale of other investments of $35.7 million, proceeds from rent enhancement of $1.8 million, principal repayments from available for sale securities and real estate loans totaling $72.4 million, net receipts of restricted cash from other investments of $18.4 million, and return of capital from equity investments of $0.4 million. This was partially offset by net cash paid to terminate swaps of $30.2 million.

        Our investing activities used net cash of $306.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily from the purchase of securities available for sale of $755.6 million, the purchase and funding of equity investments of $37.0 million and the acquisition of commercial real estate and real estate loans totaling $260.5 million, and the deposit restricted cash for investment of $6.1 million. This was partially offset by proceeds received from the sale of securities available for sale of $236.3 million, principal repayments from available for sale securities totaling $514.7 million and return of capital from equity investments of $1.1 million.

        Our financing activities used net cash of $1,386.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to net payments on repurchase agreements of $1,254.0 million, dividends paid of $33.6 million, principal repayments of CDOs and senior mortgage-backed securities of $82.0 million, payments on the settlement of derivatives of $10.5 million and payments on borrowings under our secured revolving credit facility with a related party of $28.9 million. This was partially offset by net receipts from restricted cash of $22.6 million.

        Our financing activities provided net cash of $268.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily from the issuance of CDOs of $325.0 million, the issuance of senior mortgage-backed notes to a related party of $101.5 million, proceeds from a mortgage note payable of $198.5 million and proceeds from junior subordinated debentures of $50.0 million. This was partially offset by net payments on repurchase agreements, including with related parties, of $352.0 million, and dividends paid of $33.5 million.

95

---

Table of Contents

        Our source of funds as of June 30, 2008, excluding our March 2005 and August 2006 common stock offerings and our March 2007 trust preferred offering, consisted of net proceeds from repurchase agreements totaling approximately $22.1 million with a weighted average current borrowing rate of 4.28% and borrowings under our secured revolving credit facility (which had unused availability of $61.6 million as of June 30, 2008), which we used to finance the acquisition of securities available for sale and to provide margin with respect to such borrowings, and proceeds from mortgages payable of $219.4 million, which we used to finance a portion of the purchase price for commercial real estate. We expect to continue to borrow funds in the form of credit facilities and to the extent we purchase additional commercial real estate, mortgage loans. As of the date of this report, we have established approximately 15 borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders, six of which were in use on June 30, 2008. Increases in short-term interest rates or widening of interest rate spreads could negatively affect the valuation of our mortgage-related assets, which could limit our borrowing ability or cause our lenders to initiate margin calls. We expect that amounts due upon maturity of our repurchase agreements will be funded primarily through the rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements, monthly principal and interest payments received on our mortgage-backed securities, borrowings under our secured revolving credit facility and the proceeds from asset sales.

        For our short-term (one year or less) and long-term liquidity, which includes investing and compliance with collateralization requirements under our repurchase agreements (if the pledged collateral decreases in value or in the event of margin calls created by prepayments of the pledged collateral), we also rely on the cash flow from operations, primarily monthly principal and interest payments to be received on our mortgage-backed securities, cash flow from the sale of securities, rental income from our commercial real estate investments as well as any primary debt or equity securities offerings authorized by our board of directors.

        Based on our current portfolio, leverage rate and available borrowing arrangements, we believe that the net proceeds of our equity offerings and our trust preferred offering, together with existing equity capital, combined with the cash flow from operations and the utilization of borrowings, will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated short-term (one year or less) liquidity requirements such as to fund our investment activities, pay fees under our management agreement, fund our distributions to stockholders and pay general corporate expenses. However, an increase in prepayment rates substantially above our expectations or significant spread widening could cause a temporary liquidity shortfall due to the timing of the necessary margin calls on the financing arrangements and the actual receipt of the cash related to principal paydowns. If our cash resources are at any time insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may have to sell debt or additional equity securities. If required, the sale of MBS or real estate loans at prices lower than their carrying value would result in losses. As a result of the disposition of our Agency MBS portfolio and the repayment of a significant portion of our short-term indebtedness, we are less exposed to the risk of margin calls on our short-term financings.

        In August 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million unsecured 364-day credit facility with Brookfield US Corporation, an affiliate of our Manager. Indebtedness outstanding under the unsecured credit facility bore interest at LIBOR + 4.00%. In November 2007, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of September 30, 2007, to convert the facility to a secured revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings of up to $100.0 million in the aggregate and expires in May 2009. On March 7, 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of December 31, 2007, to extend the term of the facility from November 2008 to May 2009, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth and to eliminate the financial covenants relating to minimum net income (as defined in the facility), a maximum leverage ratio and interest rate sensitivity. On August 7, 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of June 30, 2008, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth such that after giving effect to the amendment, we are required to maintain a minimum net

96

---

Table of Contents

worth of $40.0 million. The secured facility bears interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. The credit facility and the amendments were approved by the independent members of our board of directors. As of June 30, 2008, we owed $38.4 million under this facility and we had $61.6 million of unused availability under this facility, and we pledged MBS, real estate loans and a portion of the equity in our commercial real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $37.8 million to secure the $38.4 million of borrowings outstanding at such date.

        Our ability to meet our long-term (greater than one year) liquidity and capital resource requirements in excess of our borrowing capacity will be subject to obtaining additional debt financing and/or equity capital. We may increase our capital resources by making public offerings of equity securities, possibly including classes of preferred stock or common stock, or by issuing commercial paper, medium-term notes, CDOs, mortgage-backed notes, collateralized mortgage obligations and senior or subordinated notes. Such financing will depend on market conditions for capital raises and for the investment of any proceeds. If we are unable to renew, replace or expand our sources of financing on substantially similar terms, it may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock.

        We generally seek to borrow between four and eight times the amount of our equity. At June 30, 2008, our total debt was approximately $560.3 million, which represented a leverage ratio of approximately 9.1 times the amount of our equity.

        In March 2007, our unconsolidated statutory trust, Crystal River Preferred Trust I, issued $50.0 million of trust preferred securities to a third party investor. The trust preferred securities have a 30-year term, maturing in April 2037, are redeemable at par on or after April 2012 and pay interest at a fixed rate of 7.68% for the first five years ending April 2012, and thereafter, at a floating rate of three month LIBOR plus 2.75%.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        As of June 30, 2008, we did not maintain any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, or special-purpose or variable interest entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of June 30, 2008, we had two outstanding commitments to fund real estate construction loans totaling $1.0 million, and during the six months ended June 30, 2008, we made advances of $0.1 million under those commitments. One of those loans was repaid on July 1, 2008 and our unfunded commitment of $1.0 million was terminated.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

        As of March 15, 2005, we had entered into a management agreement with Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River. Hyperion Brookfield Crystal River is entitled to receive a base management fee, incentive compensation, reimbursement of certain expenses and, in certain circumstances, a termination fee, all as described in the management agreement. In March 2008, we announced that we and our Manager had agreed that our base management fee would be paid in shares of our common stock, instead of cash, during 2008. See "—Related Party Transactions." Such fees and expenses do not have fixed and determinable payments and therefore have not been included in the table below.

        As of June 30, 2008, we had an outstanding commitment to fund two real estate construction loans totaling $1.0 million, and during the six months ended June 30, 2008, we made advances of $0.1 million under those commitments. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. During the first quarter of 2008, we sold our investment in private equity funds and were released from our capital commitment related to that investment.

97

---

Table of Contents

        In June 2008, we sold 11 whole loans to a third party. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. In connection with the sale, we entered into a yield maintenance agreement which serves to protect the buyer against potential prepayments of those 11 whole loans. In accordance with the agreement, we deposited $4.1 million into a restricted trust account to serve as collateral for the potential loss contingency. The agreement provides for the quarterly release to either the buyer or us of a proportionate share of the collateral contingent on any prepayments of the 11 whole loans. Our maximum loss contingency under this agreement totaled $4.1 million. As of June 30, 2008, we accrued a loss contingency totaling $1.0 million based on assumptions developed by management relating to the timing and value of expected prepayments on the 11 loans. The loss contingency is recorded as additional realized loss on the sale of real estate loans in our statement of operations.

        The following table sets forth information about our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2008:

---

(1)

Amount is based on unpaid principal balance. As of June 30, 2008, the difference between fair value and unpaid principal balance is $275,575.

(2)

The senior mortgage-backed notes were repaid in their entirety in July 2008.

(3)

We also are subject to interest rate swaps for which we can not estimate future payments due.

        The following table presents certain information regarding our repurchase obligations as of June 30, 2008:

---

(1)

Equal to the fair value of collateral, including restricted cash and accrued interest receivable on collateral, minus repurchase agreement liabilities and accrued interest expense.



(2)

These borrowings were refinanced by JPMorgan Chase in July 2008.

98

---

Table of Contents

        The repurchase agreements for our repurchase facilities generally do not include substantive provisions other than those contained in the standard master repurchase agreement as published by the Bond Market Association. As noted below, some of our master repurchase agreements that were in effect as of the date of this report contain negative covenants requiring us to maintain certain levels of net asset value, tangible net worth and available funds and comply with interest coverage ratios, leverage ratios and distribution limitations. Two of our master repurchase agreements, which accounted for $0 of our liabilities as of June 30, 2008, provide that they may be terminated if, among other things, certain material decreases in net asset value occur, we lose our REIT status or our Manager is terminated. Generally, if we violate one of these covenants, the counterparty to the master repurchase agreement has the option to declare an event of default, which would accelerate the repurchase date. If such option is exercised, then all of our obligations would come due, including either purchasing the securities or selling the securities, as the case may be. The counterparty to the master repurchase agreement, if the buyer in such transaction, for example, will be entitled to keep all income paid after the exercise, which will be applied to the aggregate unpaid repurchase price and any other amounts owed by us, and we are required to deliver any purchased securities to the counterparty.

        Our master repurchase agreements with Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited and our secured revolving credit facility each contain a restrictive covenant that would trigger an event of default if our stockholders' equity declines below $40.0 million.

        Certain of our repurchase agreements and our secured revolving credit facility contain financial covenants, including maintaining our REIT status and maintaining a specific net asset value or worth. Effective as of June 30, 2008, we and three of our counterparties amended the terms of our secured revolving credit facility and two of our unused repurchase agreements to reset certain financial covenants that we otherwise would have failed to meet as of June 30, 2008. After giving effect to all such amendments, we were in compliance with all of such financial covenants as of June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, our stockholders' equity was $60.9 million. If our stockholders' equity decreases below $40.0 million, we would be in default under these borrowing arrangements and if we were unable to obtain a waiver or an amendment of those terms, the lenders under those facilities would have the right to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness and we could be forced to repay such indebtedness, which totaled $38.4 million as of June 30, 2008, in its entirety.

        We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income to holders of our common stock. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT and to avoid corporate-level income tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which includes net short-term capital gains) on an annual basis. This requirement can affect our liquidity and capital resources.

Impact of Inflation

        Our operating results depend in part on the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the general level of interest rates prevailing in the economy in response to changes in the rate of inflation or otherwise can affect our income by affecting the spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as, among other things, the value of our interest-earning assets. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors beyond our control. We employ the use of correlated hedging strategies to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations, including engaging in interest rate swaps to minimize our exposure to changes in interest rates. There can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect against the foregoing risks or that we will ultimately realize an economic benefit from any hedging contract into which we enter. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and our distributions are determined by our board of directors consistent with our obligation to

99

---

Table of Contents

distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis to maintain our REIT qualification; in each case, our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost and or fair market value without considering inflation.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        The principal objective of our asset/liability management activities is to maximize net investment income, while minimizing levels of interest rate risk. Net investment income and interest expense are subject to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. To mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates, we use interest rate swaps to effectively convert variable rate liabilities to fixed-rate liabilities for proper matching with fixed-rate assets. Each derivative used as a hedge is matched with an asset or liability with which it has a high correlation. The swap agreements are generally held-to-maturity and we do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. We use interest rate swaps to effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed-rate debt for the financed portion of fixed-rate assets. The differential to be paid or received on these agreements is recognized as an adjustment to the interest expense related to debt and is recognized on the accrual basis.

        As of June 30, 2008, the primary component of our market risk was interest rate risk, as described below. Although we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we do believe the risk can be quantified from historical experience and we seek to actively manage that risk, to earn sufficient compensation to justify taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake.

        Interest Rate Risk—We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with most of our investments and our related debt obligations, which are generally repurchase agreements of limited duration that are periodically refinanced at current market rates. We mitigate this risk through utilization of derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swap agreements. With respect to our commercial real estate investments, we manage interest rate risk through the use of fixed-rate mortgage loans.

        Yield Spread Risk—Most of our investments are also subject to yield spread risk. The majority of these securities are fixed-rate securities, which are valued based on a market credit spread over the rate payable on fixed-rate U.S. Treasuries of like maturity. In other words, their value is dependent on the yield demanded on such securities by the market, as based on their credit relative to U.S. Treasuries. An excessive supply of these securities combined with reduced demand will generally cause the market to require a higher yield on these securities, resulting in the use of a higher or "wider" spread over the benchmark rate (usually the applicable U.S. Treasury security yield) to value these securities. Under these conditions, the value of our real estate securities portfolio would tend to decrease. Conversely, if the spread used to value these securities were to decrease or "tighten," the value of our real estate securities would tend to increase. Such changes in the market value of our real estate securities portfolio may affect our net equity or cash flow either directly through their impact on unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities by diminishing our ability to realize gains on such securities, or indirectly through their impact on our ability to borrow and access capital.

        Effect on Net Investment Income—We fund a portion of our investments with short-term borrowings under repurchase agreements. During periods of rising interest rates, the borrowing costs associated with those investments tend to increase while the income earned on such investments could remain substantially unchanged. This results in a narrowing of the net interest spread between the related assets and borrowings and may even result in losses.

100

---

Table of Contents

        On June 30, 2008, we were party to five interest rate swap contracts and three interest rate cap contracts. The following table summarizes the expiration dates of these contracts and their notional amounts (in thousands):

        Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the RMBS will be longer or shorter, which would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex and may produce volatile returns.

        Extension Risk—We have in the past invested in, and may in the future invest in, Agency MBS and RMBS, some of which have interest rates that are fixed for the first few years of the loan (typically three, five, seven or 10 years) and thereafter reset periodically on the same basis as adjustable-rate Agency MBS and RMBS. We compute the projected weighted average life of our Agency MBS and RMBS based on assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay the underlying mortgages. In general, when a fixed-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate residential mortgage-backed security is acquired with borrowings, we may, but are not required to, enter into an interest rate swap agreement or other hedging instrument that effectively fixes our borrowing costs for a period close to the anticipated average life of the fixed-rate portion of the related Agency MBS and RMBS. This strategy is designed to protect us from rising interest rates because the borrowing costs are fixed for the duration of the fixed-rate portion of the related residential mortgage-backed security.

        However, if prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate environment, the life of the fixed-rate portion of the related Agency MBS and RMBS could extend beyond the term of the swap agreement or other hedging instrument. This could have a negative impact on our results from operations, as borrowing costs would no longer be fixed after the end of the hedging instrument while the income earned on the Agency MBS and RMBS would remain fixed. This situation may also cause the market value of the Agency MBS and RMBS that we own to decline, with little or no offsetting gain from the related hedging transactions. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to maintain adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur losses.

        Hybrid Adjustable-Rate Agency MBS Interest Rate Cap Risk—We have in the past, and may in the future, also invest in hybrid adjustable-rate Agency MBS, which are based on mortgages that are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors, which limit the amount by which the security's interest yield may change during any given period. However, our borrowing costs pursuant to our repurchase agreements generally are not subject to similar restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates, interest rate costs on our borrowings could increase without limitation by caps, while the interest-rate yields on our hybrid adjustable-rate Agency MBS would effectively be limited by caps. This problem will be magnified to the extent we acquire hybrid adjustable-rate Agency MBS that are not based on mortgages that are fully indexed. In addition, the underlying mortgages may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. This could result in our receipt of less cash income on our hybrid adjustable-rate Agency MBS than we need in order to pay the interest cost

101

---

Table of Contents

on our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net investment income or cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would harm our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

        Interest Rate Mismatch Risk—We intend to continue to fund a substantial portion of our investments with borrowings that, after the effect of hedging, have interest rates based on indices and repricing terms similar to, but of somewhat shorter maturities than, the interest rate indices and repricing terms of our investments. Thus, we anticipate that in most cases the interest rate indices and repricing terms of our mortgage assets and our funding sources will not be identical, thereby creating an interest rate mismatch between assets and liabilities. Therefore, our cost of funds would likely rise or fall more quickly than would our earnings rate on assets. During periods of changing interest rates, such interest rate mismatches could negatively impact our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we may utilize the hedging strategies discussed above.

        Our analysis of risks is based on management's experience, estimates, models and assumptions. These analyses rely on models that utilize estimates of fair value and interest rate sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or implementation of investment decisions by our management may produce results that differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in our models and the projected results shown in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

        Prepayment Risk—Prepayments are the full or partial repayment of principal prior to the original term to maturity of a mortgage loan and typically occur due to refinancing of mortgage loans. Prepayment rates for existing RMBS generally increase when prevailing interest rates fall below the market rate existing when the underlying mortgages were originated. In addition, prepayment rates on adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS generally increase when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates declines or becomes negative. Prepayments of RMBS could harm our results of operations in several ways. Some adjustable-rate mortgages underlying our adjustable-rate RMBS may bear initial "teaser" interest rates that are lower than their "fully-indexed" rates, which refers to the applicable index rates plus a margin. In the event that such an adjustable-rate mortgage is prepaid prior to or soon after the time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate, the holder of the related RMBS would have held such security while it was less profitable and lost the opportunity to receive interest at the fully-indexed rate over the expected life of the adjustable-rate RMBS. Additionally, we currently own mortgage assets that were purchased at a premium. The prepayment of such assets at a rate faster than anticipated would result in a write-off of any remaining capitalized premium amount and a consequent reduction of our net investment income by such amount. Finally, in the event that we are unable to acquire new mortgage assets to replace the prepaid assets, our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations could be negatively affected.

        Credit Risk—Our portfolio of commercial real estate loans and securities is subject to a high degree of credit risk. Credit risk is the exposure to loss from debtor defaults. Default rates are subject to a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, property performance, property management, supply and demand factors, construction trends, consumer behavior, regional economics, interest rates, the strength of the United States economy and other factors beyond our control.

        All loans are subject to a certain probability of default. We underwrite our CMBS and RMBS investments assuming the underlying loans will suffer a certain dollar amount of defaults and the defaults will lead to some level of realized losses. Loss adjusted yields are computed based on these assumptions and applied to each class of security supported by the cash flow on the underlying loans. The most significant variables affecting loss adjusted yields include, but are not limited to, the number of defaults, the severity of loss that occurs subsequent to a default and the timing of the actual loss. The different rating levels of CMBS will react differently to changes in these assumptions. The lowest rated securities are generally more sensitive to changes in timing of actual losses. The higher rated securities are more sensitive to the severity of losses.

102

---

Table of Contents

        We generally assume that substantially all of the principal of a non-rated security will not be recoverable over time. The timing and the amount of the loss of principal are the key assumptions to determine the economic yield of these securities. Timing is of paramount importance because we will assume substantial losses of principal on the non-rated securities, therefore the longer the principal balance remains outstanding the more interest the holder receives to support a greater economic return. Alternatively, if principal is lost faster than originally assumed, there is less opportunity to receive interest and a lower return or loss may result.

        If actual principal losses on the underlying loans exceed assumptions, the higher rated securities will be affected more significantly as a loss of principal may not have been assumed. We manage credit risk through the underwriting process, establishing loss assumptions and monitoring of loan performance. Before acquiring an interest in the controlling class security (represented by a majority ownership interest in the most subordinate tranche) in a proposed pool of loans, we perform a rigorous analysis of all of the proposed underlying loans. Information from this review is then used to establish loss assumptions. We assume that a certain portion of the loans will default and calculate an expected or loss adjusted yield based on that assumption. After the securities have been acquired, we monitor the performance of the loans, as well as external factors that may affect their value.

        Factors that indicate a higher loss severity or acceleration of the timing of an expected loss will cause a reduction in the expected yield and therefore reduce our earnings. Furthermore, we may be required to write down a portion of the accreted cost basis of the affected assets through a charge to income.

        We also invest in commercial real estate loans, primarily mezzanine loans, bridge loans, A Notes, B Notes, loans to real estate companies, whole mortgage loans, first mortgage participations and net leased real estate. We may also invest in residential mortgages and related securities. These investments will be subject to credit risk. The extent of our credit risk exposure will be dependent on risks associated with commercial and residential real estate. Property values and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing, retail, industrial, office or other commercial space); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; retroactive changes to building or similar codes; and increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs). In the event a borrower's net operating income decreases, the borrower may have difficulty repaying our loans, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses. When we underwrite the origination of a commercial real estate loan, we do not underwrite to an expected loss; when we underwrite the purchase of a commercial real estate loan, we may underwrite to an expected loss based on the price of the loan.

        Effect on Fair Value—Another component of interest rate risk is the effect changes in interest rates will have on the market value of our assets. We face the risk that the market value of our assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of our liabilities, including our hedging instruments. We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities. Duration essentially measures the market price volatility of financial instruments as interest rates change. We generally calculate duration using various financial models and empirical data. Different models and methodologies can produce different duration numbers for the same securities.

        The following interest rate sensitivity analysis is measured using an option-adjusted spread model combined with a proprietary prepayment model. We shock the curve up and down 100 basis points and analyze the change in interest rates, prepayments and cash flows through a Monte Carlo simulation. We then calculate an average price for each scenario, which is used in our risk management analysis.

103

---

Table of Contents

        The following sensitivity analysis table shows the estimated impact on the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments, repurchase agreement liabilities, CDO liabilities, senior mortgage-backed notes, mortgages payable, junior subordinated notes, secured revolving credit facility indebtedness and swaps and caps, at June 30, 2008, assuming rates instantaneously fall 100 basis points and rise 100 basis points:

104

---

Table of Contents

---

(1)

The fair value of all of our available-for-sale investments is included.

(2)

The fair value of the repurchase agreements would not change materially due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

n/m

= not meaningful

        It is important to note that the impact of changing interest rates on fair value can change significantly when interest rates change beyond 100 basis points from current levels. Therefore, the volatility in the fair value of our assets could increase significantly when interest rates change beyond 100 basis points. In addition, other factors affect the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the fair value of our assets would likely differ from that shown above, and such difference might be material and adverse to our stockholders.

        Currency Risk—From time to time, we may make investments that are denominated in a foreign currency through which we may be subject to foreign currency exchange risk. Changes in currency rates can adversely affect the fair values and earnings of our non-U.S. holdings. We attempt to mitigate this impact by utilizing currency swaps on our foreign currency-denominated investments or foreign currency forward commitments to hedge the net exposure.

Related Party Transactions

        We have entered into a management agreement, as amended (the "Agreement"), with our Manager. The initial term of the Agreement expires in December 2008. After the initial term, the Agreement will be automatically renewed for a one-year term each anniversary date thereafter unless we or our Manager terminate the Agreement. The Agreement provides that our Manager will provide us with investment management services and certain administrative services and will perform our day-to-day operations. The monthly base management fee for such services is equal to 1.5% of one-twelfth of our equity, as defined in the Agreement, payable in arrears. In March 2008, we and our Manager agreed that during 2008, we would pay the base management fee in shares of our common stock, rather than in cash. In May 2008, we issued 68,338 shares of our common stock to our Manager in respect of the base management fee for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 at a price per share of $10.15 and in August 2008, we issued 99,998 shares of our common stock to our Manager in respect of the base management fee for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 at a price per share of $4.18.

        In addition, under the Agreement, our Manager earns a quarterly incentive fee equal to 25% of the amount by which the quarterly net income per share, as defined in the Agreement (which principally excludes the effect of stock compensation and the unrealized change in derivatives), exceeds an amount equal to the product of the weighted average of the price per share of the common stock we issued in our March 2005 private offering and in our August 2006 initial public offering and the price per share of common stock in any subsequent offerings by us, multiplied by the higher of (i) 2.4375% or (ii) 25% of the then applicable 10 year Treasury note rate plus 0.50%, multiplied by the then weighted average number of outstanding shares for the quarter. The incentive fee is paid

105

---

Table of Contents

quarterly. The Agreement provides that 10% of the incentive management fee is to be paid in shares of our common stock (providing that such payment does not result in our Manager owning directly or indirectly more than 9.8% of our issued and outstanding common stock) and the balance is to be paid in cash. Our Manager may, at its sole discretion, elect to receive a greater percentage of its incentive management fee in shares of our common stock. The incentive management fees included in our consolidated statements of operations that were incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $0, $0.1 million, $0 and $0.1 million, respectively.

        The Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the independent members of our board of directors after the expiration of the initial term and by providing at least 180 days prior notice based upon either: (i) unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is materially detrimental to us, or (ii) a determination by the independent members of our board of directors that the management fees payable to our Manager are not fair (subject to our Manager's right to prevent a compensation termination by agreeing to a mutually acceptable reduction of the management fees). If we terminate the Agreement, then we must pay our Manager a termination fee equal to twice the sum of the average annual base and incentive fees earned by our Manager during the two twelve-month periods immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination.

        We issued to our Manager 84,000 shares of our restricted common stock and granted options to purchase 126,000 shares of our common stock for a 10 year period at a price of $25 per share in March 2005. We issued to one of our executive officers 30,000 shares of restricted common stock in March 2006. 10,000 of such shares vested on March 15, 2007 and the remaining 20,000 shares were forfeited in April 2007 when the executive officer to whom such shares were issued resigned from his position with us. We issued to one of our directors 2,000 shares of restricted stock in November 2006 and 2,000 shares of restricted stock in May 2007, both of which vest on the first anniversary of the date of issuance. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the base management expense was $1.1 million, $3.7 million, $0.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Included in the management fee expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $0 million, $0.4 million, $0 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of amortization of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock and options granted.

        The Agreement provides that we are required to reimburse our Manager for certain expenses incurred by our Manager on our behalf provided that such costs and reimbursements are no greater than that which would be paid to outside professionals or consultants on an arm's length basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we were not charged any reimbursable costs by our Manager.

        In January 2007, we purchased a $28.5 million investment in BREF One, LLC (the "Fund"), a real estate finance fund sponsored by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. ("Brookfield"), the indirect parent of our Manager, and managed by a Brookfield subsidiary, and incurred a $10.4 million unfunded capital commitment to the Fund. The acquisition was made from two subsidiaries of Brookfield. As of December 31, 2007, the unfunded commitment totaled $1.5 million. During the first quarter of 2008, we sold our interest in the Fund to an affiliate of our Manager at its carrying value of $35.7 million and we were released from our unfunded capital commitment to the Fund. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the three months ended June 30, 2008 we had less than $0.1 million of equity losses from our investment in the fund and during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the three months ended June 30, 2007, we had $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of equity income from our investment in the Fund.

106

---

Table of Contents

        In August 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million unsecured 364-day credit facility with Brookfield US Corporation, an affiliate of our Manager. Indebtedness outstanding under the unsecured credit facility bore interest at LIBOR + 4.00%. In November 2007, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of September 30, 2007, to convert the facility to a secured revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings of up to $100.0 million in the aggregate and expires in May 2009. On March 7, 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of December 31, 2007, to extend the term of the facility from November 2008 to May 2009, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth and to eliminate the financial covenants relating to minimum net income (as defined in the facility), a maximum leverage ratio and interest rate sensitivity. On August 7, 2008, we and Brookfield US Corporation amended the terms of the facility, effective as of June 30, 2008, to revise the financial covenant relating to minimum net worth such that after giving effect to the amendment, we are required to maintain a minimum net worth of $40.0 million. The secured facility bears interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. The credit facility and the amendments were approved by the independent members of our board of directors. The credit agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants limiting dividends, liens, mergers, asset sales and other fundamental changes. In addition, the credit agreement contains additional covenants, which include maintaining a certain minimum net worth. As of June 30, 2008, we owed $38.4 million under this facility.

        We and our Manager have entered into sub-advisory agreements with other affiliated entities and the fees payable under such agreements will be paid from any management fees earned by our Manager. In addition, certain of these affiliated sub-advisory entities introduced investments to us for purchase that we acquired for a total of $0.0 million and $262.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The purchase price of two commercial real estate properties that we purchased in March 2007 from an affiliate of our Manager, at a total cost of approximately $234.2 million, were determined as part of a competitive bid process, and the purchase price of our investment in a private equity fund managed by an affiliate of our Manager, at a total initial cost of approximately $28.5 million, was acquired at its book value assuming hypothetical liquidation. All such acquisitions were approved in advance by the independent members of our board of directors.

Risk Management

        To the extent consistent with maintaining our REIT status, we seek to manage our interest rate risk exposure to protect our portfolio of RMBS and other mortgage securities and related debt against the effects of major interest rate changes. We generally seek to manage our interest rate risk by:

•

monitoring and adjusting, if necessary, the reset indices and interest rates related to our MBS and our borrowings;



•

attempting to structure our borrowing agreements to have a range of different maturities, terms, amortizations and interest rate adjustment periods;



•

using derivatives, financial futures, swaps, options, caps, floors and forward sales, to adjust the interest rate sensitivity of our MBS and our borrowings; and



•

actively managing, on an aggregate basis, the interest rate indices, interest rate adjustment periods, and gross reset margins of our MBS and the interest rate indices and adjustment periods of our borrowings.

Note on Forward-Looking Statements

        Except for historical information contained herein, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),

107

---

Table of Contents

which involve certain risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are included with respect to, among other things, our current business plan, business and investment strategy and portfolio management. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of such terms and phrases as "intends," "intend," "intended," "estimate," "estimates," "expects," "expect," "expected," "project," "projected," "projections," "anticipates," "anticipated," "should," "designed to," "foreseeable future," "believe" and "believes" and similar expressions. Our actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

        Important factors that we believe might cause actual results to differ from any results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements are discussed in the cautionary statements contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-Q, which are incorporated herein by reference. In assessing forward-looking statements contained herein, readers are urged to read carefully all cautionary statements contained in this Form 10-Q.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        See the discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk in the "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations above.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Notwithstanding the foregoing, no matter how well a control system is designed and operated, it can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within our Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports. Also, we may have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. Because we do not control these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

        As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2008.

Changes in Internal Controls

        There have been no changes in our "internal control over financial reporting" (as defined in paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

108

---

Table of Contents

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

        None

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

        There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on March 14, 2008 with the SEC. A copy of those risk factors, updated for June 30, 2008, are attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

        None.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities

        None

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        On June 10, 2008, we held our annual meeting of stockholders (the "Meeting") in New York, New York for the purpose of (i) electing two Class III directors to serve on the board until our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; and (ii) ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The total number of shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Meeting was 24,704,945, of which 20,353,302 shares, or 82.4%, were present in person or by proxy.

        The following table sets forth the number of votes in favor, the number of votes opposed, the number of abstentions (or votes withheld in the case of the election of directors) and broker non-votes with respect to each of the foregoing proposals.

        There was no solicitation in opposition to the foregoing nominees by stockholders. The terms of office for Janet Graham, Harald Hansen and Bruce K. Robertson, our Class I directors, and William F. Paulsen and Louis P. Salvatore, our Class II directors, continued after the Meeting.

        The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 was approved by our stockholders with 20,234,500 votes "For," 83,494 votes "Against" and 35,308 votes "Abstained," none of which such abstentions were actually broker non-votes that were treated as abstentions.

Item 5.    Other Information

        On August 7, 2008, Crystal River Capital, Inc. (the "Company") amended its Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Brookfield US Corporation, as lender, to revise the financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum net worth of $100 million such that the minimum net worth requirement is now $40 million. The lender is an affiliate of the Company's external manager.

II-1

---

Table of Contents

        The foregoing description is only a summary of certain terms and conditions of the Amendment and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amendment, which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

        The information in this Item 5 would otherwise have been reported on a current report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 1.01.

Item 6.    Exhibits

---

*

Filed herewith.

II-2

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

S-1

---