Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
         
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

o

 

No fee required.

ý

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.*
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        Common Stock of TransMontaigne Inc.

    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        53,031,949 shares of Common Stock

    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        $11.35 per share of Common Stock

    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        $632,775,682

    (5)   Total fee paid:
        $67,707


ý

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        

    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        

    (3)   Filing Party:
        

         

    (4)   Date Filed:
        


*
As of the record date, July 17, 2006, there were outstanding 53,031,949 shares of Common Stock. The filing fee was determined by adding (x) the product of (i) the 53,031,949 shares of Common Stock proposed to be acquired in the merger, and (ii) the merger consideration of $11.35 in cash per share of Common Stock, plus (y) $30,863,060 payable to holders of outstanding stock options and warrants granted by TransMontaigne in exchange for the cancellation of such options and warrants. The payment of the filing fee, calculated in accordance with Fee Rate Advisory #5 for Fiscal Year 2006, equals $107.00 per million of the aggregate merger consideration calculated pursuant to the preceding sentence.

LOGO

TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

1670 BROADWAY, SUITE 3100

DENVER, COLORADO 80202

July 25, 2006

Dear TransMontaigne Inc. Stockholder:

        You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the stockholders of TransMontaigne Inc., a Delaware corporation ("TransMontaigne"), to be held on August 31, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. local time at the Central City Room of The Brown Palace Hotel, 321 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a merger agreement dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among TransMontaigne, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Morgan Stanley Capital Group"), and Buffalo Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Capital Group ("Merger Co"), pursuant to which Merger Co will be merged with and into TransMontaigne, with TransMontaigne as the surviving corporation in the merger. Upon completion of the merger each issued and outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive $11.35 in cash, as more fully described in the enclosed proxy statement.

        Our board of directors believes the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are fair to and in the best interests of TransMontaigne and its stockholders. Our board of directors has approved the merger agreement and unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" adoption of the merger agreement.

        Your vote is very important. The merger cannot be completed unless the merger agreement is adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders (as of the record date) of our outstanding shares of common stock. If you do not expect to attend the meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please vote your proxy as soon as possible so that your vote will be counted. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting by written notice to such effect, by submitting a subsequently dated proxy or by attending the meeting and voting in person.

  Sincerely,
  Graphic

Donald H. Anderson
President and Chief Executive Officer

        The enclosed proxy statement is dated July 25, 2006 and is first being mailed to stockholders of TransMontaigne on or about July 28, 2006.


LOGO

TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

1670 BROADWAY, SUITE 3100

DENVER, COLORADO 80202


NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 31, 2006


To the Stockholders of TransMontaigne Inc.:

        Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the stockholders of TransMontaigne Inc., a Delaware corporation ("TransMontaigne"), will be held on August 31, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. local time at the Central City Room of The Brown Palace Hotel, 321 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, for the following purposes:

        1.     To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among TransMontaigne, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. ("Morgan Stanley Capital Group") and Buffalo Merger Sub Inc., ("Merger Co"), pursuant to which Merger Co, a wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, will be merged with and into TransMontaigne, with TransMontaigne as the surviving corporation. Upon completion of the merger each issued and outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive $11.35 in cash.

        2.     To consider and vote upon any other matters that properly come before the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on July 17, 2006, the record date of the special meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. The enclosed proxy statement explains the proposed merger and provides specific information regarding the special meeting. TransMontaigne encourages you to carefully review these materials in their entirety. If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares, please call our proxy solicitor, The Altman Group, toll-free at 1-800-499-7619.

  By order of the Board of Directors,
  Graphic

Erik B. Carlson
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Denver, Colorado
July 25, 2006

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

        Even if you do not expect to attend the meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented. Please use the enclosed proxy card to vote on the matters to be considered at the meeting, sign and date the proxy card and mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. You may also vote by telephone or via the Internet as indicated in the proxy card instructions. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting by written notice to such effect, by submitting a subsequently dated proxy, or by attending the meeting and voting in person.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
SUMMARY TERM SHEET

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND THE MERGER

PARTICIPANTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

THE SPECIAL MEETING
 
General
 
Record Date and Voting Information
 
How You Can Vote
 
How You May Revoke or Change Your Vote
 
Expenses of Proxy Solicitation
 
Adjournments

SPECIAL FACTORS
 
Background of the Merger
 
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
 
Reasons for Our Board of Directors' Recommendation; Factors Considered
 
Opinion of Our Financial Advisor
 
Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

THE MERGER
 
Effective Time of Merger
 
Payment of Merger Consideration and Surrender of Stock Certificates
 
Regulatory Matters
 
Anticipated Accounting Treatment
 
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
 
Appraisal Rights
 
Conduct of Our Business if the Merger is Not Consummated

THE MERGER AGREEMENT
 
General
 
Treatment of Our Stock in the Merger
 
Representations and Warranties
 
Conduct of Business by TransMontaigne Before the Merger
 
Covenants of TransMontaigne
 
Other Obligations of the Parties
     

i


 
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
 
Termination
 
Fees and Expenses
 
Amendments and Waivers

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING ONE ADDRESS

WHERE STOCKHOLDERS CAN FIND FURTHER INFORMATION

Appendix A

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among TransMontaigne Inc., Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and Buffalo Merger Sub Inc.

Appendix B

 

Opinion of UBS Securities LLC

Appendix C

 

Delaware General Corporation Law Section 262

 

ii


TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

Summary Term Sheet

        This Summary Term Sheet highlights selected information contained in this proxy statement and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You are urged to read this entire proxy statement carefully, including the appendices and the section entitled "Where Stockholders Can Find More Information" on page 60. In this proxy statement, the terms "we," "us," "our," "TransMontaigne" and the "company" refer to TransMontaigne Inc. We refer to TransMontaigne Partners L.P. as "TransMontaigne Partners" and TransMontaigne GP L.L.C. as "TransMontaigne GP." We refer to Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. as "Morgan Stanley Capital Group" and Buffalo Merger Sub Inc. as "Merger Co". We refer to UBS Securities LLC as "UBS." We refer to SemGroup, L.P. and its affiliated companies as "SemGroup."

Purpose of Stockholder Vote   You are being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among TransMontaigne, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co, which we refer to as the "Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement" or the "merger agreement." Pursuant to the merger agreement, Merger Co will be merged with and into TransMontaigne, and TransMontaigne will be the surviving corporation. Following the merger, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will own all of our issued and outstanding capital stock. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 14.

Parties involved in the Proposed Transaction

 

TransMontaigne is a Delaware corporation. Morgan Stanley Capital Group is a Delaware Corporation. Merger Co is a newly-formed Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Capital Group. See "Participants" on page 11.

Effect of Merger on TransMontaigne

 

Following completion of the merger, TransMontaigne, as the surviving corporation, will no longer have common stock quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. Our existing stockholders will no longer have an equity interest in TransMontaigne or participate in any potential future earnings and growth of TransMontaigne. See "The Merger—Effective Time of the Merger" beginning on page 36.

Effect of the Merger on Our Outstanding Capital Stock

 

Upon completion of the merger each issued and outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive $11.35 in cash. See "The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Our Stock in the Merger" beginning on page 43.

Treatment of Outstanding Options and Restricted Stock Awards

 

Upon completion of the merger, each option that is not vested will become fully vested and all options will be cancelled in consideration for a cash payment. Any forfeiture restrictions in effect on shares of our restricted stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be terminated and such shares will be converted into the right to receive $11.35 in cash. See "The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Our Stock in the Merger" beginning on page 43.
     

1



Special Meeting

 

The stockholders' vote will take place at a special meeting of our stockholders to be held on August 31, 2006 at the Central City Room of The Brown Palace Hotel, 321 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, at 9:00 a.m. local time. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 14.

Record Date

 

You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on July 17, 2006, which is the record date for the special meeting. On the record date, 53,031,949 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting. As of the record date, all outstanding shares of our Series B convertible preferred stock previously had been converted into shares of our common stock in accordance with their terms. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 14.

Voting Information

 

Holders of our common stock will have one vote for each share of our common stock owned at the close of business on the record date. For more information on how to vote your shares, please refer to "Questions and Answers About the Meeting and the Merger" and "The Special Meeting—How You Can Vote" beginning on pages 8 and 15, respectively.

Vote Required

 

The merger will be completed only if the merger agreement is adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the outstanding shares of our common stock (as of the record date). This means that your failure to vote shares registered in your name or to give instruction to your broker or other nominee that holds shares beneficially owned by you will have the same effect as a vote against adoption of the merger agreement. On the record date, our directors and executive officers were deemed to beneficially own shares of our common stock representing, in the aggregate, approximately 13.3% of the outstanding votes entitled to be cast, and have indicated that, although they are not obligated to do so, they intend to vote their shares in favor of adoption of the merger agreement. See "Questions and Answers About the Meeting and the Merger" and "The Special Meeting — Record Date and Voting Information" beginning on pages 8 and 14, respectively.

Board Recommendations

 

Our board of directors has recommended that the holders of our common stock vote to adopt the merger agreement. In approving the merger agreement and related agreements, and recommending that you vote for the adoption of the merger agreement, our board of directors considered a number of factors. For a discussion of the factors considered by our board of directors. See "Special Factors—Reasons for Our Board of Directors' Recommendation; Factors Considered" beginning on page 25.
     

2



Background of the Merger

 

On March 21, 2006, we received a written offer from Morgan Stanley Capital Group to purchase all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of TransMontaigne for $8.50 per common share, in cash. At the time of the offer, we were in discussions to sell TransMontaigne to SemGroup. We entered into an agreement and plan of merger with SemGroup on March 27, 2006, under which SemGroup agreed to purchase all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $9.75 per common share, in cash. On April 26, 2006, we received a written offer from Morgan Stanley Capital Group to purchase all of our issued and outstanding equity securities for $10.50 per common share, in cash, and otherwise on substantially the same terms as the March 27, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. On April 28, 2006, our board of directors authorized our senior management to meet with representatives of Morgan Stanley Capital Group to negotiate a definitive merger agreement in accordance with the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer. On May 8, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group delivered a letter stating that it had completed final due diligence, and making a formal binding offer of $10.50 per common share, in cash. On the same date, our board of directors determined that the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer dated May 8, 2006 constituted a superior proposal. On May 12, 2006, following our receipt of an amended and restated merger agreement from SemGroup dated May 12, 2006, under which SemGroup agreed to purchase all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $10.75 per common share, in cash, our board of directors determined that the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup was as least as favorable to our stockholders as the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer and recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. On May 17, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group delivered a new formal binding offer for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $11.00 per common share, in cash. On May 18, 2006, our board of directors determined that the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer dated May 17, 2006 constituted a superior proposal. On May 23, 2006, following our receipt of an amended and restated merger agreement from SemGroup dated May 22, 2006, under which SemGroup agreed to purchase all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $11.25 per common share, in cash, our board of directors determined that the May 22, 2006 merger agreement from SemGroup was as least as favorable to our stockholders as the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer dated May 17, 2006, and recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. On June 18, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group delivered a new formal binding offer for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $11.35 per common share, in cash. On June 19, 2006, our board of directors met and determined that the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer dated June 18, 2006 constituted a superior proposal. On June 20, 2006, SemGroup notified us that it did not intend to raise its offer price. On June 21, 2006, our board of directors approved the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement dated June 22, 2006 and recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt the Morgan Stanley Capital Group
     

3



 

 

merger agreement. On June 22, 2006, we formally terminated the SemGroup merger agreement, paid to SemGroup the required termination fee of $15 million and executed the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. See "Special Factors—Background of the Merger" beginning on page 16.

Opinion of UBS Securities LLC

 

UBS acted as financial advisor to our board of directors in connection with the transaction. On June 21, 2006, UBS delivered its opinion to our board of directors to the effect that, as of June 21, 2006, and based on and subject to various assumptions made, matters considered and limitations described in the opinion, the cash consideration of $11.35 per share was fair, from a financial point of view, to holders of our common stock.

 

 

The full text of UBS' opinion describes, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by UBS. UBS' opinion is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement. UBS' opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the per share consideration to be received in the merger by holders of our common stock and does not address any other aspect of the merger. The opinion also does not address the relative merits of the merger as compared to other business strategies or transactions that might be available to us or any underlying business decision of ours in connection with the merger or any other matter. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of our common stock as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger. You are encouraged to read UBS' opinion carefully in its entirety. The summary of UBS' opinion described above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. UBS' opinion was necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to UBS as of, the date of the UBS opinion. UBS does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. See "Special Factors—Opinion of Our Financial Advisor" beginning on page 27.

Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

 

In considering the recommendations of our board of directors, you should be aware that some directors and executive officers of TransMontaigne may have interests in the merger that are in addition to, and different from, your interests as a stockholder and that may present actual or potential conflicts of interest. The board of directors considered these interests when making its decision to approve the merger agreement. These interests are discussed in detail in the section entitled "Special Factors—Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 33.

Merger Financing

 

TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group estimate that the total amount of funds necessary to complete the merger and related transactions, including the cost to redeem or repurchase our outstanding 91/8% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes due 2010, which we refer to as "our notes," which will take place after, or concurrently with, consummation of the merger, and to pay related fees and expenses, will be approximately $890 million.
     

4



Regulatory Approvals

 

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which we refer to as the "HSR Act," and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder required that Morgan Stanley Capital Group and TransMontaigne file notification and report forms with respect to the merger and related transactions with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the "FTC". The parties thereafter were required to observe a waiting period before completing the merger. TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group completed filing the necessary forms with the Department of Justice and the FTC on June 28, 2006. On July 12, 2006, TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group were granted early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act. We are not aware of any other material federal, state or local regulatory requirements or approvals that are required to complete the merger. See "The Merger—Regulatory Matters" on page 38.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

The merger will be treated as a taxable transaction to our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Holders should consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the merger to them in light of their particular circumstances. See "The Merger—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences" beginning on page 38.

Appraisal Rights

 

Our stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law if they follow the requirements specified in Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which we refer to as the "DGCL." A copy of Section 262 of the DGCL is attached as Appendix C to this proxy statement. The obligation of each of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co to complete the merger is subject to the condition that holders of not more than 15% of our shares of common stock have properly demanded and are entitled to appraisal of their shares in accordance with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL. See "The Merger—Appraisal Rights" beginning on page 39.

Limitations on Solicitation of Other Offers

 

Except as permitted under the merger agreement, we have agreed not to (1) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing non-public information or providing access to our properties, books, records or personnel) any inquiries regarding, (2) make any proposal or offer that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, (3) participate in any discussions or negotiations concerning, (4) execute or enter into any agreement, understanding or arrangement with respect to, or (5) approve or recommend or propose to approve or recommend, any acquisition proposal by a third party or any agreement, understanding or arrangement with respect to an acquisition proposal, in each case while the merger is pending. We have also agreed not to (x) take any action to exempt any third party from the restrictions on business combinations contained in Delaware law or (y) waive, terminate, modify or fail to
     

5



 

 

enforce any provisions of any standstill agreement or similar obligation into which any third party has entered. In addition, our board of directors may not (A) withdraw or modify, or propose publicly to withdraw or modify, in a manner adverse to Morgan Stanley Capital Group, its recommendation that our stockholders adopt the merger agreement, (B) approve or recommend, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, an acquisition proposal by a third party, (C) approve or recommend or allow us to enter into any letter of intent, acquisition agreement or any similar agreement or understanding related to an acquisition proposal by a third party or requiring us to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the merger or any other transaction contemplated by the merger agreement or (D) effect any transaction contemplated by any acquisition proposal by a third party, except in each case as permitted under the merger agreement. See "The Merger Agreement—Covenants of TransMontaigne—Acquisition Proposals" beginning on page 49.

Conditions

 

The obligations of either one or both of TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group to consummate the merger are subject to the prior satisfaction, or waiver to the extent permitted by law, of various conditions specified in the merger agreement, including conditions relating to, among other things, (1) the adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders, (2) the provision for redemption of, or amendment to, our notes, (3) the absence of any law or governmental order prohibiting or enjoining the merger, (4) the expiration of any waiting periods under the HSR Act (early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act was granted on July 12, 2006) or other laws and the receipt of all required governmental approvals, (5) provision to replace the existing credit facility of TransMontaigne Partners on terms reasonably acceptable to TransMontaigne GP, (6) the accuracy of the parties' respective representations and warranties, (7) the performance of the parties' respective obligations under the merger agreement in all material respects, (8) the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to TransMontaigne and (9) the number of shares with respect to which TransMontaigne stockholders have exercised rights of appraisal not exceeding an agreed upon maximum level. See "The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Completion of the Merger" beginning on page 54.

Termination

 

TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group may agree by mutual written consent to terminate the merger agreement at any time before the effective time of the merger. In addition, either TransMontaigne or Morgan Stanley Capital Group may terminate the merger agreement upon the occurrence of various events specified in the merger agreement, including, among other things, (1) the failure to consummate the merger by September 30, 2006, (2) the existence of a law or governmental order prohibiting the merger, (3) the failure of our stockholders to adopt the merger agreement or (4) the entry of a final order by a governmental antitrust authority of a nature more specifically described in the merger agreement.
     

6



 

 

We may terminate the merger agreement if, among other things, (1) any of the representations and warranties of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co contained in the merger agreement are or become untrue or inaccurate and the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and accurate, individually or in the aggregate, would prevent the consummation of the merger or prevent Morgan Stanley Capital Group or Merger Co from performing its obligations under the merger agreement, (2) there has been a material breach on the part of Morgan Stanley Capital Group or Merger Co of any of its covenants or agreements contained in the merger agreement (subject to cure) or (3) an agreement with respect to a superior proposal is entered into or there is a withdrawal or modification of the recommendation of the board of directors with respect to the merger (provided that we pay the termination fee to Morgan Stanley Capital Group).

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital Group may terminate the merger agreement if, among other things, (1) any of our representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement are or become untrue or inaccurate and the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and accurate, individually or in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on us, (2) we have materially breached any of our covenants or agreements contained in the merger agreement (subject to cure) or (3) there is a withdrawal or modification of the recommendation of our board of directors with respect to the merger.

 

 

See "The Merger Agreement—Termination" beginning on page 55.

Expense Reimbursement Pursuant to the Merger Agreement

 

In specified circumstances, if the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, we must pay a termination fee of $15 million to Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Similarly, in specified circumstances, Morgan Stanley Capital Group must pay us a termination fee of $15 million. In addition, Morgan Stanley Capital Group has agreed to pay us a reverse termination fee of $25 million in the event the merger agreement is terminated either because the merger has not occurred prior to January 31, 2007, through no fault of TransMontaigne and all conditions other than those related to antitrust have been satisfied, or because Morgan Stanley Capital Group's compliance with a final, non-appealable order from a governmental antitrust authority would result in the divestiture or holding separate of $50 million in assets or an adverse financial impact of $50 million on the conduct of the business of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, TransMontaigne and their affiliates, taken as a whole. The $25 million reverse termination fee includes $7.5 million, which is reimbursable on termination of the merger agreement under certain circumstances, that Morgan Stanley Capital Group advanced us upon execution of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. This $7.5 million payment will also be credited against any of Morgan Stanley Capital Group's obligations to pay fees in the event of termination. The advance was used as partial payment of the $15 million termination fee to SemGroup. See "The Merger Agreement—Fees and Expenses" beginning on page 56.

7



Questions and Answers about the Meeting and the Merger

        The following questions and answers are for your convenience only, and briefly address some commonly asked questions about the meeting and the merger. You should still carefully read this entire proxy statement, including the attached appendices.

Q:
Why am I receiving these materials?

A:
Our board of directors is providing these proxy materials to give you information for your use in determining how to vote in connection with the special meeting of our stockholders and whether to seek appraisal of your shares.

Q:
What am I being asked to vote upon?

A:
You are being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger agreement, pursuant to which Merger Co will merge with and into TransMontaigne, with TransMontaigne as the surviving corporation in the merger.

Q:
When and where is the special meeting?

A:
The special meeting of our stockholders will be held on August 31, 2006 at the Central City Room of The Brown Palace Hotel, 321 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado, at 9:00 a.m. local time.

Q:
Who can vote on the merger agreement?

A:
All holders of our common stock and preferred stock at the close of business on July 17, 2006, the record date for the special meeting, may vote in person or by proxy on the adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting.

Q:
What vote is required to adopt the merger agreement?

A:
The merger agreement must be adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders as of the record date of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Q:
What will I receive in the merger?

A:
Upon completion of the merger, you will receive $11.35 in cash for each issued and outstanding share of our common stock you own. See "The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Our Stock in the Merger" beginning on page 43.

Q:
When do you expect the merger to be completed?

A:
Because the merger is subject to certain conditions, the exact timing of the merger cannot be determined. The parties to the merger agreement, however, are working to complete the merger as soon as practicable. If the merger agreement is adopted and the other conditions to the merger are satisfied or waived, the merger is expected to be completed promptly after the special meeting.

Q:
How do I vote my stock?

A:
You may vote in the following ways:

(1)
Voting by Mail.    If you choose to vote by proxy through the mail, simply mark your proxy, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

(2)
Voting in Person.    You can also vote by appearing and voting in person at the special meeting.

(3)
Voting by Telephone.    You can vote your shares by proxy by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day.

8


Q:
What happens if I do not submit a proxy or vote my shares in person at the meeting?

A:
The failure to vote your shares by proxy either by telephone, via the Internet or by returning your proxy card or to vote in person at the meeting will have the same effect as voting against adoption of the merger agreement.

Q:
May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card?

A:
Yes. You may revoke and change your vote at any time before your proxy card is used at the meeting. You can do this by:

    giving written notice of revocation to our secretary;

    submitting another proper proxy by telephone, via the Internet or later-dated written proxy;

    or attending the meeting and voting by paper ballot in person.


If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow directions received from your broker to change those instructions.

Q:
If my shares are held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

A:
Your broker will not be able to vote your shares without instructions from you. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares, following the procedures provided by your broker. Failure to instruct your broker to vote your shares will have the same effect as voting against adoption of the merger agreement.

Q:
What does it mean if I receive more than one set of materials?

A:
This means you own shares of our stock that are registered under different names. For example, you may own some shares directly as a stockholder of record and other shares through a broker; or you may own shares through more than one broker. In these situations, you will receive multiple sets of proxy materials. You must vote, sign and return all of the proxy cards or follow the instructions for any alternative voting procedure on each of the proxy cards that you receive in order to vote all of the shares you own. Each proxy card you receive comes with its own prepaid return envelope; if you vote by mail, make sure you return each proxy card in the return envelope that accompanies that proxy card.

Q:
If the merger is completed, how will I receive the cash for my shares?

A:
If the merger is completed, you will be provided with instructions that will explain how to surrender stock certificates. You will receive cash for your shares after you comply with these instructions. If your shares of common stock are held in "street name" by your broker, you will receive instructions from your broker as to how to effect the surrender of your "street name" shares and receive cash for those shares.

9


Q:
Should I send in my stock certificates now?

A:
No. After the merger is completed, you will receive written instructions from the paying agent that will explain how to surrender stock certificates. See "The Merger—Payment of Merger Consideration and Surrender of Stock Certificates" on page 37.

Q:
What rights do I have to seek appraisal of my shares?

A:
You are entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law if you follow the requirements specified in Section 262 of the DGCL. A copy of Section 262 of the DGCL is attached as Appendix C to this proxy statement. See "The Merger—Appraisal Rights" beginning on page 39.

Q:
Who can help answer my questions?

A:
If you would like additional copies, without charge, of this proxy statement or if you have questions about the merger agreement or the merger, including the procedures for voting your shares, you should contact:


The Altman Group
1200 Wall Street West
3rd Floor
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
1-800-499-7619

10



Participants

        Set forth below is information regarding the individuals and entities that may be deemed "participants" in the solicitation of proxies from our stockholders in connection with the special meeting pursuant to the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which we refer to as the "Exchange Act."

TransMontaigne Inc.
1670 Broadway, Suite 3100
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 626-8200

        We are a refined petroleum products terminaling, distribution and supply company with operations in the United States, primarily in the Gulf Coast, Florida, East Coast and Midwest regions. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "TMG." In addition, our executive officers and directors of TransMontaigne may also be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from our stockholders in connection with the special meeting.

Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
Buffalo Merger Sub Inc.
2000 Westchester Avenue, Floor 01
Purchase, NY 10577
Telephone: (914) 225-1466

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group, directly and through its affiliates, trades as principal and maintains proprietary trading positions in the spot, forward and futures markets in several commodities, including precious metals, base metals, crude oil, oil products, natural gas, electric power, emission credits and related energy products. Morgan Stanley Capital Group is a market-maker in exchange-traded and over-the-counter options and swaps on commodities, such as metals, crude oil, oil products, natural gas and electricity, and offers clients hedging programs relating to production, consumption, reserve/inventory management and energy-contract securitizations. Morgan Stanley Capital Group trades many of these products through the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., an electronic trading system in which Morgan Stanley Capital Group maintains an ownership interest. Morgan Stanley Capital Group is an electricity power marketer in the U.S. and is the sole or majority shareholder of three exempt wholesale generators (as defined in the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935) from which Morgan Stanley Capital Group is the exclusive purchaser of electric power.

        Merger Co, a newly formed Delaware corporation, was formed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group solely for the purpose of completing the merger. Merger Co is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Capital Group and has not engaged in any business except in connection with the merger.

11



Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Information

        This proxy statement includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this proxy statement regarding the prospects of our industry and our prospects, plans, financial position and business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "should," "will," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "plan," "foresee," "believe" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or variations of them or similar terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct. All such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the relevant forward-looking statement. In addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement and the specific risk factors described in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of Operations—Risk Factors," of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q subsequent to June 30, 2005, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to:

12


Readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating forward-looking statements.

        All written or oral forward-looking statements herein attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are made only as of the date of this proxy statement, and we do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of any material change in any of the information previously disclosed, we will, where relevant and if required by applicable law, update such information through a supplement to this proxy statement to the extent necessary.

        All information contained in this proxy statement concerning Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Merger Co and their respective affiliates and designees has been supplied by the respective parties and has not been independently verified by TransMontaigne.

13



The Special Meeting

General

        The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of our board of directors for use at a special meeting of our stockholders to be held on August 31, 2006 at the Central City Room of The Brown Palace Hotel, 321 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado, at 9:00 a.m. local time, or at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, for the purposes set forth in this proxy statement and in the accompanying notice of special meeting. We intend to mail this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card on or about July 28, 2006 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting.

        At the special meeting, our stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Our board of directors has approved the merger agreement and unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" adoption of the merger agreement.

        We do not expect a vote to be taken on any other matters at the special meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the special meeting for consideration, however, the holders of all properly authorized proxies will have discretion to vote on these matters in accordance with their best judgment.

        Please do not send in stock certificates at this time. If the merger is completed, you will be sent instructions regarding the procedures for exchanging your existing stock certificates for the appropriate per share cash payment. See "The Merger—Payment of Merger Consideration and Surrender of Stock Certificates" on page 37.


Record Date and Voting Information

        Only holders of our common stock outstanding on July 17, 2006, the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, 53,031,949 shares of our common stock were outstanding. As of the record date, all outstanding shares of our Series B convertible preferred stock previously had been converted into shares of our common stock in accordance with their terms.

        Each holder of record will have one vote for each share of our common stock owned at the close of business on the record date. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the special meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as shares present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining a quorum. "Broker non-votes" result when brokers are precluded from exercising their voting discretion with respect to the approval of non-routine matters such as the adoption of the merger agreement and, thus, absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares, brokers are not permitted to vote the shares with respect to non-routine matters.

        Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting, that is, the majority of votes entitled to be cast, as of the record date, by the holders of our common stock. If you vote your shares of our common stock by submitting a properly executed and dated proxy card or by telephone or Internet proxy, your shares will be voted at the meeting as indicated on your signed proxy card, telephone proxy or Internet proxy. If no instructions are indicated on your signed proxy card or telephone proxy or Internet proxy, all of your shares represented by the proxy will be voted FOR the adoption of the merger agreement. Because the vote is based on the number of shares outstanding rather than on the number of votes cast, failure to vote your shares is effectively a vote against adoption of the merger agreement.

        As of the record date, our directors and executive officers were deemed to beneficially own, in the aggregate, 7,033,865 outstanding shares of our common stock, or collectively, approximately 13.3% of

14



the outstanding votes entitled to be cast. Our directors and officers have indicated that, although they are not obligated to do so, they intend to vote their shares in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement.


How You Can Vote

        You may vote your shares as follows:

        If you vote by telephone or via the Internet you should not return your proxy card. Instructions on how to vote by telephone or via the Internet are located on the proxy card enclosed with this proxy statement.

        If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, trustee or other holder of record, including the trustee or other fiduciary of an employee benefit plan, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the special meeting.


How You May Revoke or Change Your Vote

        You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by:


Expenses of Proxy Solicitation

        We will bear the entire cost of solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy statement, the proxy card and any additional information furnished to you. Original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone or personal solicitation by our directors, officers or other regular employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for these services. We have also hired The Altman Group to solicit proxies and to distribute proxy materials for the special meeting. The Altman Group also has agreed to provide proxy solicitation services with regard to banks, brokers, institutional investors and individual stockholders. We have agreed to pay The Altman Group a base fee of $8,100, an hourly rate of $110.00 for telephone solicitations, if necessary, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for their services. Custodians, nominees and fiduciaries will be requested to forward the proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by those persons, and we will reimburse them for their charges and expenses.


Adjournments

        Our restated bylaws provide that if an annual or special meeting of stockholders is adjourned, notice need not be given of any adjourned meeting if the time, date and place are announced at the

15



meeting at which the adjournment occurs, so long as the adjourned meeting is no more than 30 days after the initial meeting date and no new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting. If the meeting is adjourned for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies, our stockholders who have already sent in their proxies will be allowed to revoke them at any time prior to their use.


Special Factors

Background of the Merger

        In July 2004, our board of directors authorized management to engage UBS to assist us in evaluating possible strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of TransMontaigne. UBS prepared materials regarding TransMontaigne and contacted numerous potentially interested parties including SemGroup, Plains All-American Pipeline L.P., Valero Energy Corporation and a team consisting of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. No potential transaction emerged from that process and, in September 2004, our board of directors decided to discontinue a review of strategic alternatives. Instead, our board of directors instructed management to pursue both a product supply agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, which was completed as of November 4, 2004, and an initial public offering of our consolidated subsidiary, TransMontaigne Partners, which was completed on May 27, 2005. Following this process, we continued our normal-course, ongoing evaluation of our business, plans and strategic alternatives. As part of this process, our management, in consultation with our board of directors, periodically evaluated various alternatives for expanding our business and creating value for our stockholders, including through acquisitions of, or strategic combinations with, other petroleum product, distribution and supply companies.

        During 2005, we engaged in ongoing conversations with Morgan Stanley Capital Group regarding expanding and developing our business relationship and possible changes to our product supply agreement to address certain operating issues that had arisen under that agreement. On or about September 15, 2005, we initially raised with Javed Ahmed, executive director of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, the possible sale of TransMontaigne to Morgan Stanley Capital Group. On October 20, 2005, we executed a confidentiality agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group and began to provide Morgan Stanley Capital Group with due diligence information regarding TransMontaigne. From October 2005 through February 2006 we engaged in periodic discussions with Morgan Stanley Capital Group regarding our business and prospects and the possibility that Morgan Stanley Capital Group would acquire us, but no offer to acquire TransMontaigne was received from Morgan Stanley Capital Group until March 21, 2006, as described below.

        On January 19, 2006, at SemGroup's invitation, Donald H. Anderson, our president and chief executive officer, Randall J. Larson, our executive vice president, chief financial and accounting officer, and William S. Dickey, our executive vice president and chief operating officer, met with Thomas L. Kivisto, SemGroup's chief executive officer, and Gregory C. Wallace, SemGroup's chief financial officer, to discuss possible commercial opportunities between SemGroup and TransMontaigne. The possibility of a business combination was not discussed at that time.

        On March 2, 2006, Thomas L. Kivisto telephoned Donald H. Anderson and informed him that SemGroup was interested in making an offer to purchase TransMontaigne. On March 3, 2006, Thomas L. Kivisto telephoned Donald H. Anderson and asked if they could meet at Centennial Airport located outside of Denver, Colorado on Monday, March 6, 2006, to discuss SemGroup's potential offer to acquire TransMontaigne. On March 6, 2006, Messrs. Anderson, Kivisto and Wallace met for approximately one hour to discuss SemGroup's interest in acquiring TransMontaigne. As a result of this discussion, SemGroup delivered a letter dated March 6, 2006 to TransMontaigne setting forth its non-binding offer to acquire all of our issued and outstanding common stock (including stock issuable upon the exercise of any vested options or other rights to purchase) and preferred stock for a cash

16



purchase price of $9.75 per common share pursuant to a merger, tender offer or a combination of the foregoing. SemGroup's offer was conditioned upon:

        The letter also requested that we agree to the following binding terms:

        On March 6, 2006, the date we received the non-binding offer letter from SemGroup, our common stock closed at $7.54 per share. From March 7, 2006 through Thursday, March 9, 2006, management discussed the terms of the offer letter internally and with Morrison & Foerster, our outside counsel. During this time, representatives of Morrison & Foerster discussed with senior management the necessity for adequate fiduciary out provisions in any definitive agreement, as well as the specific terms of possible fiduciary out provisions.

        On March 9, 2006, at a regularly scheduled meeting of our board of directors, the board of directors met with management to discuss the potential transaction with SemGroup. At the conclusion of the meeting, the board of directors authorized our senior management to continue to engage in discussions with SemGroup, but not to accept the terms of the offer as written, primarily based on the following concerns:

        During the afternoon of Friday, March 10, 2006, management informed SemGroup that TransMontaigne was willing to pursue a transaction if SemGroup agreed to:

17


        The participants also discussed in principle our requirement that, should we elect to enter into a transaction with SemGroup, any definitive agreement with respect to such a transaction would have to contain an adequate fiduciary out provision.

        As a result of these discussions, the parties agreed to prepare a term sheet setting forth the material terms upon which each party was willing to move forward and to meet in person to discuss the proposed terms the following day.

        On Saturday, March 11, 2006, our senior management team comprised of Donald H. Anderson, William S. Dickey, Randall J. Larson, Frederick W. Boutin, our senior vice president and treasurer, Erik B. Carlson, our senior vice president and general counsel, and representatives of Morrison & Foerster, met with SemGroup, represented by Gregory C. Wallace and representatives of SemGroup's outside counsel, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C., which we refer to as "Hall Estill," to discuss the terms of the proposed transaction. The initial proposal presented to SemGroup set forth the specific terms of the fiduciary out provisions we would require in any definitive agreement, including provisions related to the payment of a mutual termination, or break-up, fee by each of TransMontaigne and SemGroup under specified circumstances. The initial proposal also set forth substantially all of the material terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including conditions to closing, the treatment of our notes and various covenants.

        Based on these discussions, later that Saturday, the parties agreed on the material terms upon which the parties were willing to proceed. Specifically, the parties agreed to:

        On Saturday night and Sunday morning, the revised terms were incorporated into an initial draft of the merger agreement. On Sunday, March 12, 2006, our senior management and Morrison & Foerster met with SemGroup and Hall Estill to discuss the initial draft of the merger agreement. At this time the parties executed a mutual non-disclosure agreement.

        On Monday, March 13 through Wednesday, March 15, 2006, representatives of SemGroup, including representatives of its commercial banker, Bank of America, N.A., met with our senior management team in Denver to conduct a business and financial due diligence review of TransMontaigne. At this time, SemGroup and TransMontaigne Partners entered into a mutual non-disclosure agreement so that we could discuss non-public information regarding TransMontaigne Partners. As a result of these discussions, SemGroup indicated that the cash purchase price it was willing to agree upon was $9.75 per share for our common stock.

        On Tuesday, March 14, 2006, SemGroup informed us that it would not be able to deliver its financing commitment letters until early the following week and the anticipated signing of the merger agreement would need to be pushed back until the week of March 20, 2006.

18



        On Friday, March 17, 2006, our board of directors met with senior management and our outside legal counsel to discuss the current terms of the merger agreement with SemGroup. The board discussed and considered soliciting or pursuing other indications of interest for TransMontaigne. Our board of directors concluded that it was more likely to achieve a higher value by focusing on negotiating a transaction with SemGroup. Our board of directors also determined that, if we were to pursue a transaction with SemGroup without first soliciting other indications of interest in TransMontaigne, it would require inclusion of a broad fiduciary out provision in the merger agreement.

        At the March 17, 2006 meeting, our board of directors formally engaged UBS to act as its financial advisor for the potential transaction and evaluate and render an opinion with respect to the consideration to be received by holders of our common stock in the merger.

        Also at the March 17, 2006 meeting, the board of directors considered the arrangements that had been made with respect to our management and employees in the transaction, including the proposed treatment of outstanding equity awards, the adoption of a severance program for our employees, excluding our executive officers, and the terms of the change of control agreements previously entered into with our senior management and other key officers.

        On March 21, 2006, Donald H. Anderson received a written offer from Morgan Stanley Capital Group to purchase TransMontaigne. Pursuant to the offer, Morgan Stanley Capital Group proposed to purchase all of our issued and outstanding equity securities for $8.50 per common share, in cash. The offer was subject to completion of due diligence, the execution of definitive agreements and obtaining definitive financing commitments. The parent company of Morgan Stanley Capital Group publicly filed with the SEC an amendment to its Schedule 13D on March 22, 2006 disclosing the terms of the offer made to our board of directors. On March 21, 2006, our common stock closed at $7.42 per share. On March 22, 2006, our common stock closed at $9.22 per share.

        On March 22, 2006, our board of directors and its financial and legal advisors met in Denver. Our board of directors received from Morrison & Foerster and Randall J. Larson an update on the status of the negotiations with SemGroup and the remaining unresolved issues. Our board of directors also received a detailed presentation from UBS, including various financial analyses utilizing different methodologies. Also at this meeting, Morrison & Foerster reviewed the fiduciary duties of our board of directors, as well as the principal terms and conditions of the proposed transaction with SemGroup as reflected in the draft merger agreement, including the circumstances related to the payment of termination fees; our ability to provide information to, and negotiate with, third parties concerning competing proposals; and the conditions to consummation of the transaction, including the condition related to SemGroup obtaining adequate financing to consummate the transaction.

        Also at this meeting, our board of directors discussed the offer made by Morgan Stanley Capital Group on March 21, 2006. After considering a number of factors, including (1) that the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer price was $1.25 per share below the price of the SemGroup offer, and (2) the possibility that pursuing the proposal could jeopardize the ongoing negotiations with SemGroup, or result in a decrease in SemGroup's proposed per share price, our board of directors decided not to take any action to pursue the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer further and instructed senior management to convey to Morgan Stanley Capital Group that our board of directors had been advised of the terms of their offer. At the conclusion of the March 22 meeting, our board of directors directed our senior management team and advisors to continue negotiations with SemGroup in an effort to finalize the terms of the merger agreement.

        After disclosure of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer, two additional companies contacted us, one of which was Plains All American GP LLC, which we refer to as "Plains GP." Plains GP had spoken with us briefly at a conference for investors interested in master limited partnerships held in New York on March 8, 2006 and more extensively in a telephone conversation on March 14, 2006, where Plains GP informed us that they had continued to monitor and analyze the operations of

19



TransMontaigne and TransMontaigne Partners subsequent to 2004. On March 23, 2006, we and Plains GP entered into a mutual non-disclosure agreement, but no further discussions were held between us and Plains GP and no due diligence information was requested or provided pursuant to the mutual non-disclosure agreement.

        On Thursday, March 23, 2006, we received draft commitment letters for the financing package which was to be arranged for SemGroup by Bank of America, N.A. and Banc of America Securities LLC. Our legal and financial advisors participated in discussions and revisions of the draft commitment letters over the course of the next several days, with a view toward improving the commitments from our perspective by reducing the conditionality contained therein.

        On March 24, 2006, our chief financial officer, Randall J. Larson, returned a phone call to Valero Energy Corporation, which we refer to as "Valero," and engaged in a conversation with representatives of Valero who inquired about TransMontaigne's reaction to the offer from Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Mr. Larson indicated that TransMontaigne was not in a position to comment on the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer. Although there was no discussion of a possible offer by Valero to acquire TransMontaigne, on March 24, 2006, Mr. Larson sent a mutual non-disclosure agreement to Valero, which Valero representatives signed and returned. Since March 24, 2006, we have had no further discussions with Valero and have not provided any information pursuant to the mutual non-disclosure agreement.

        During the weekend of March 25, representatives of TransMontaigne and SemGroup worked to finalize the terms of the merger agreement, the financing commitment letters and related agreements and documentation.

        On the morning of March 27, we received a letter from Plains GP dated March 26, 2006, under which Plains GP, as the general partner of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., which we refer to as "Plains LP," offered to purchase, directly or indirectly, all of our outstanding common stock for $9.00 per common share, in cash, and to purchase each common unit of TransMontaigne Partners not owned by TransMontaigne for $31.00 per unit, in cash. The offer was subject to customary terms and conditions, but did not include a financing condition.

        On March 27, 2006, our board of directors met to consider the proposed transaction with SemGroup. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster updated our board of directors on the results of the negotiations that had taken place since the previous meeting and described the final terms of the merger agreement and related transaction documents, including the final financing commitments. Our board of directors considered the terms of these agreements. Our board of directors then reviewed the Plains GP offer and taking into account the price of the offer at $9.00 per common share versus SemGroup's offer at a price of $9.75 per common share, the current status of the negotiations with SemGroup, and the possibility that pursuing the Plains GP proposal could jeopardize the ongoing negotiations with SemGroup, determined to move forward with SemGroup.

        Next, representatives of UBS referred to its earlier financial analysis provided to our board of directors on March 22, 2006, and on March 27, 2006 delivered to our board of directors its opinion to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and based on and subject to various assumptions made, the matters considered and limitations described in the opinion, that the consideration of $9.75 per common share, in cash, to be received by holders of our common stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

        Our board of directors then approved the terms of, and authorized our officers to enter into, the March 27, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup, which we refer to as the "March 27, 2006 merger agreement," and recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt the March 27, 2006 merger agreement.

20


        Shortly after the meeting, and after the close of trading of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, TransMontaigne, SemGroup, SemGroup Subsidiary and Merger Co executed the March 27, 2006 merger agreement and issued a press release announcing the transaction.

        On Wednesday, April 26, 2006, Donald H. Anderson received a written offer from Morgan Stanley Capital Group to purchase all of our issued and outstanding equity securities for $10.50 per common share, in cash, and otherwise on substantially the same terms as the March 27, 2006 merger agreement. Morgan Stanley Capital Group's offer was subject only to (1) satisfactory review and approval of the disclosure schedule and other schedules and exhibits to the merger agreement, (2) satisfactory completion of confirmatory due diligence and (3) our execution of a definitive merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. The parent company of Morgan Stanley Capital Group publicly filed with the SEC an amendment to its Schedule 13D on April 27, 2006 disclosing the terms of the offer made to our board of directors.

        On the evening of April 27, 2006, SemGroup, SemGroup Subsidiary and Merger Co waived the requirement that our board of directors first make a good faith determination that Morgan Stanley Capital Group's offer could reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal prior to entering into negotiations with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. At a board meeting held during the morning of April 28, 2006, our board authorized our senior management to meet with Javed Ahmed and John Shapiro, chairman of the board and president of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, to negotiate a definitive merger agreement in accordance with the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer.

        During the week of May 1, 2006 representatives of Morgan Stanley Capital Group completed their due diligence review of TransMontaigne. On Friday, May 5, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group provided us with an initial draft of the merger agreement between Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Buffalo Merger Sub Inc. and us. During the weekend of May 6, representatives of TransMontaigne, Morrison & Foerster, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and its outside counsel, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, worked to finalize the terms of the merger agreement and related agreements and documentation.

        By letter dated May 8, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group delivered a formal binding offer for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares of our capital stock for $10.50 per common share, in cash, together with the definitive merger agreement, executed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, which we sometimes refer to as the "May 8, 2006 merger agreement." The offer was not subject to any due diligence or financing conditions and otherwise was substantially similar to the terms of the March 27, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. By its terms, the letter constituted a binding, irrevocable offer by Morgan Stanley Capital Group to enter into the May 8, 2006 merger agreement. The offer would expire at 8:00 p.m. Denver time on Monday, May 8, 2006, unless our board of directors had notified SemGroup that it was prepared to terminate the March 27, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup to enter into the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. If our board of directors delivered this notice, then the offer would expire at 5:00 p.m. Denver time on Friday May 12, 2006.

        On May 8, 2006, our board of directors met to consider the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer letter and definitive May 8, 2006 merger agreement. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster updated our board of directors on the results of the negotiations that had taken place since the previous meeting and described the final terms of the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group and related transaction documents. After considering the terms of the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group and comparing such terms with the terms of the March 27, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup, our board of directors determined that the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group constituted a superior proposal. Our board of directors then authorized our senior management to notify SemGroup that our board of directors was prepared to terminate the March 27, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup

21



and enter into the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. We notified Morgan Stanley Capital Group and SemGroup of our board's determination on May 8, 2006.

        In response to our May 8, 2006 notification, on May 11, 2006, SemGroup delivered an amended and restated merger agreement dated May 12, 2006, which we refer to as the "May 12, 2006 merger agreement." The May 12, 2006 merger agreement provided for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares of our capital stock for $10.75 per common share, in cash. In addition, SemGroup eliminated the former financing condition as a prerequisite to closing, and substantially increased the financial threshold at which SemGroup would be permitted to terminate the transaction in the event of an unfavorable response from any governmental antitrust authority. Specifically, before SemGroup would be permitted to terminate the May 12, 2006 merger agreement, the effects of complying with the governmental antitrust authority's response would have to result in a material adverse effect upon the combined entities, taken as a whole.

        On May 12, 2006, our board of directors met to consider the terms of the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster described to our board of directors the revised terms of the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup and related transaction documents as compared to the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. After considering the terms of the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup as compared to the terms of the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, our board of directors determined that the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup was more favorable to our stockholders than the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Our board of directors then approved the terms of, authorized our officers to enter into, and recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt, the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. We notified Morgan Stanley Capital Group and SemGroup of our board's determination on May 12, 2006.

        By letter dated May 17, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group delivered another binding, irrevocable offer for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $11.00 per common share, in cash, together with the related definitive merger agreement, executed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, which we refer to as the "May 17, 2006 merger agreement." As compared to the May 8, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, the revised Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer (1) increased to $50 million the financial threshold at which Morgan Stanley Capital Group would be permitted to terminate the transaction in the event of an unfavorable response from any governmental antitrust authority, (2) provided for an advance on signing of $7.5 million and (3) included a termination fee of $17.5 million payable by Morgan Stanley Capital Group to us in the event that Morgan Stanley Capital Group exercised its right to terminate the May 17, 2006 merger agreement due to an unfavorable response from any governmental antitrust authority. The offer would expire at 8:00 p.m. Denver time on Thursday, May 18, 2006, unless our board of directors had notified SemGroup that it was prepared to terminate the existing May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup to enter into the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. If our board of directors delivered this notice, then the offer would expire at 7:00 a.m. Denver time on Wednesday, May 24, 2006. The parent company of Morgan Stanley Capital Group publicly filed with the SEC an amendment to its Schedule 13D on May 18, 2006 disclosing the terms of the offer made to our board of directors.

        On May 18, 2006, our board of directors met to consider the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer letter and definitive May 17, 2006 merger agreement. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster described the final terms of the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group as compared to the terms of the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. After considering the terms of the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group as compared the terms of the existing May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup, our board of directors determined that the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley

22



Capital Group constituted a superior proposal. Our board of directors then authorized our senior management to notify SemGroup that our board of directors was prepared to terminate the May 12, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup and enter into the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. We notified Morgan Stanley Capital Group and SemGroup of our board's determination on May 18, 2006.

        In response to our May 18, 2006 notification, on May 22, 2006, SemGroup delivered to us an amended and restated merger agreement dated May 22, 2006, which we refer to as the "May 22, 2006 merger agreement." The May 22, 2006 merger agreement (1) increased the cash payment to holders of our common stock from $10.75 per common share to $11.25 per common share and (2) included a $10 million reverse termination fee payable by SemGroup to us in the event that the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup was terminated either because the merger has not occurred prior to December 31, 2006, through no fault of TransMontaigne, or because SemGroup's compliance with a final, non-appealable order from a governmental antitrust authority would result in a material adverse effect on the conduct of the business of SemGroup, TransMontaigne and their affiliates, taken as a whole. The May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup also clarified that for such a material adverse effect to occur it would have to result in a minimum financial impact in excess of $50 million.

        On May 22, 2006, we also received a second request from the FTC for TransMontaigne and SemGroup to supply additional information and documentary materials under the HSR Act. Receipt of the second request extended the original 30-day waiting period until 30 days following our compliance with the FTC's supplemental information request. We estimated that it would take us between two and three months to compile the supplemental information requested by the FTC.

        On May 23, 2006, our board of directors met to consider the terms of the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster described the final terms of the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup as compared to the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. In addition, representatives of Morrison & Foerster discussed the likely impact on the consummation of the merger due to the issuance of a second request from the FTC and the likelihood of receiving a similar request if TransMontaigne entered into the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group.

        Next, representatives of UBS delivered to our board of directors UBS' opinion, dated May 23, 2006, to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and based on and subject to various assumptions made, the matters considered and limitations described in the opinion, the consideration of $11.25 per share, in cash, to be received by holders of our common stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

        After considering the terms of the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup as compared to the terms of the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, our board of directors determined that the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup was more favorable to our stockholders than the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Our board of directors then approved the terms of, authorized our officers to enter into, and recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt, the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. We notified Morgan Stanley Capital Group and SemGroup of our board's determination on May 23, 2006.

        By letter dated June 18, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group delivered a binding, irrevocable offer for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares of capital stock for $11.35 per common share, in cash, together with a definitive merger agreement, executed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Except for the price, the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement was substantially the same as the May 17, 2006 merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. The offer would expire at 8:00 p.m. Denver time on Monday, June 19, 2006, unless our board of directors had notified SemGroup that it was prepared to terminate the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup to enter into the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. If our board of directors delivered this notice, then

23



the offer would expire at 7:00 a.m. Denver time on Friday, June 23, 2006. The parent company of Morgan Stanley Capital Group publicly filed with the SEC an amendment to its Schedule 13D on June 19, 2006 disclosing the terms of the offer made to our board of directors.

        On June 19, 2006, our board of directors met to consider the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer letter and Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster compared the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement to the terms of the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup. In addition, representatives of Morrison & Foerster discussed whether a merger with Morgan Stanley Capital Group may be less difficult to close, taking into account the issues raised by the FTC in the the second request with respect to the SemGroup transaction and the likelihood of receiving a similar request for information if we entered into a merger agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. After considering the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement as compared the terms of the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup, our board of directors determined that the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement constituted a superior proposal. Our board of directors then authorized our senior management to notify SemGroup that our board of directors was prepared to terminate the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup and enter into the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. We notified Morgan Stanley Capital Group and SemGroup of our board's determination on June 19, 2006.

        On June 20, 2006, SemGroup informed us that it did not intend to raise its offer price for TransMontaigne.

        On June 21, 2006, in light of SemGroup's decision, our board of directors met again to formally approve the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. Management and representatives of Morrison & Foerster informed our board of directors that no material changes had been made to the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement subsequent to the board meeting on June 19, 2006. Next, representatives of UBS delivered to our board of directors UBS' opinion, dated June 21, 2006, to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and based on and subject to various assumptions made, the matters considered and limitations described in the opinion, the consideration of $11.35 per share, in cash, to be received by holders of our common stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. Our board of directors then approved the terms of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement, authorized our officers to terminate the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup in accordance with its terms and, subject to such termination, to enter into the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement. Further, our board of directors resolved to recommend that our stockholders approve and adopt the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement.

        On June 22, 2006, we terminated the May 22, 2006 merger agreement with SemGroup, paid to SemGroup the required termination fee of $15 million, executed the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement and issued a press release announcing the same. On June 23, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group advanced us $7.5 million, which is reimbursable under certain circumstances, which we used as partial payment of the termination fee to SemGroup.


Recommendation of Our Board of Directors

        After consideration of the matters discussed above and the factors discussed in the next succeeding section of this proxy statement, our board of directors, by unanimous vote:

24



Reasons for Our Board of Directors' Recommendation; Factors Considered

        In approving the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement and related agreements, and recommending that you vote for the adoption of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement, our board of directors considered a number of factors, including the following material factors:

25


        Our board of directors also considered potentially negative factors in its deliberations concerning the merger, including:

26


        The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by our board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by our board of directors. Our board of directors collectively reached the decision to approve the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement in light of the factors described above and other factors that each member of the board of directors felt was appropriate. In view of the variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, our board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determination and recommendation. In addition, individual directors may have given differing weights to different factors.

        As described under the caption "—Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 33, our board of directors was aware that certain of our directors and executive officers have interests in the merger that are, or may be, different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders. Our board of directors was of the view that these interests, either alone or in connection with the factors discussed above, did not change its conclusion that it should authorize the merger and recommend to our stockholders the adoption of the Morgan Stanley Capital Group merger agreement.


Opinion of Our Financial Advisor

        On June 21, 2006, UBS delivered its opinion to our board of directors to the effect that, as of June 21, 2006, and based on and subject to various assumptions made, matters considered and limitations described in the opinion, the consideration of $11.35 per share in cash to be received by holders of our common stock in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

        The full text of UBS' opinion describes, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by UBS. UBS' opinion is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement. UBS' opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the per share consideration to be received in the merger by holders of our common stock and does not address any other aspect of the merger. The opinion also does not address the relative merits of the merger as compared to other business strategies or transactions that might be available to us or any underlying business decision of ours in connection with the merger or any other matter. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of our common stock as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger. Holders of our common stock are encouraged to read UBS' opinion carefully in its entirety. The summary of UBS' opinion described below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.

27



        In arriving at its opinion, UBS:

        In connection with its review, with our consent, UBS did not assume any responsibility for independent verification of any of the information that UBS reviewed for the purpose of its opinion and, with our consent, UBS relied on that information being complete and accurate in all material respects. In addition, with our consent, UBS did not make any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of TransMontaigne or Morgan Stanley Capital Group, and UBS was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. With respect to the financial forecasts and estimates referred to above, UBS assumed, at our direction, that they were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our management as to our future performance. UBS' opinion was necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to UBS as of, the date of its opinion. UBS does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.

        At our direction, UBS was not asked to and did not, offer any opinion as to the terms (other than the merger consideration) of the merger agreement or the form of the merger. UBS also assumed, with our consent, that (1) the final executed form of the merger agreement does not differ in any material respect from the draft dated June 21, 2006 that UBS examined; (2) the parties will comply with all material terms of the merger agreement; and (3) the merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement without any adverse waiver or amendment to any material term or condition thereof. UBS has also assumed, with our consent, that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the merger will be obtained without any material adverse effect on the parties or the merger. In 2004, UBS assisted TransMontaigne in contacting parties regarding a potential business combination with TransMontaigne; however, in connection with the merger, UBS has not been authorized to solicit, and has not solicited, indications of interest in a business combination with TransMontaigne from any party.

        In furnishing its opinion, UBS did not purport that it is an expert within the meaning of the term "expert" as used in the Securities Act, nor did it purport that its opinion constitutes a report or valuation within the meaning of the Securities Act.

        In connection with rendering its opinion, UBS performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses. The material analyses are summarized below. The following summary is not a complete description of all the analyses performed and factors considered by UBS in connection with its opinion.

28



The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving subjective judgments and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.

        Accordingly, UBS believes that its analyses and the summary below must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying UBS' analyses and opinion. None of the analyses performed by UBS were assigned greater significance or reliance by UBS than any other. UBS did not form an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or factor, whether positive or negative, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support UBS' opinion. Rather, UBS arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole, and believes that the totality of the factors considered and analyses it performed in connection with its opinion operated collectively to support its determination as to the fairness of the merger consideration from a financial point of view to the holders of our common stock.

        The estimates of our future performance provided by our management in or underlying UBS' analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those estimates. In performing its analyses, UBS considered industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond our control. Estimates of the financial value of companies do not necessarily purport to be appraisals or reflect the prices at which companies may actually be sold.

        The merger consideration was determined through negotiation between TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of our board of directors. UBS' opinion and financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by our board of directors in its evaluation of the proposed transaction and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of our board of directors or management with respect to the merger and the merger consideration.

        The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by UBS and reviewed by our board of directors in connection with UBS' opinion relating to the proposed merger. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand UBS' financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of UBS' financial analyses.

Analysis of Selected Publicly Traded Diversified General Partner C-Corporations

        UBS compared selected financial information, ratios and public market values of TransMontaigne to corresponding financial information, ratios and public market values of the following selected publicly traded diversified general partner C-corporations in the midstream industry that UBS considered reasonably comparable, for purposes of this analysis, to TransMontaigne in certain respects:


        UBS reviewed, among other information, for each of TransMontaigne and the selected companies the ratio of the relevant company's total enterprise value, referred to as TEV, calculated as the market value of equity (in the case of the selected companies, based on June 19, 2006 closing stock prices and, in the case of TransMontaigne, based on March 21, 2006 closing stock price (the last trading day before

29


public disclosure of the initial Morgan Stanley Capital Group offer) and at the $11.35 offer price) plus total debt and other long-term liabilities, less cash and cash equivalents, to estimated EBITDA for 2006.

        Estimated financial data for the selected companies were based on publicly available information, various research reports, and consensus estimates and for TransMontaigne were based on estimates provided by our management. This analysis indicated the following multiples:

 
   
   
   
  Total
Enterprise
Value /
EBITDA

 
 
   
   
  Implied
Enterprise
Value
($ mm)

 
 
  Price as of
3/21/06
($)

  Market Value
of Equity
($ mm)

  CY 2006E
(x)

 
Diversified GP C-Corporation Mean               9.8 (2)
Diversified GP C-Corporation Median               9.8 (2)
TransMontaigne
At Market
                 
  TransMontaigne with No Dropdowns   7.42   437.0   575.4   10.5  
  TransMontaigne Pro Forma for Brownsville/River Dropdown(1)   7.42   437.0   482.3   10.9  
  TransMontaigne Pro Forma for Brownsville/River and Southeast facilities Dropdown(1)   7.42   437.0   368.9   12.0  
At Offer                  
  TransMontaigne with No Dropdowns   11.35   670.1   808.5   14.7  
  TransMontaigne Pro Forma for Brownsville/River Dropdown(1)   11.35   670.1   713.7   16.1  
  TransMontaigne Pro Forma for Brownsville/River and Southeast facilities Dropdown(1)   11.35   670.1   599.3   19.6  

(1)
Change in enterprise value reflects after-tax cash proceeds from the assumed sale of the relevant facilities to TransMontaigne Partners ("Dropdown"), assumed to occur on December 31, 2005, and the expected accretion from TransMontaigne's ownership interests in TransMontaigne Partners and TransMontaigne GP. The resulting TEV/EBITDA multiple reflects both the TEV adjustments and lower EBITDA as a result of the asset sale(s). EBITDA excludes revenues and operating costs of TransMontaigne Partners' assets and includes distributions to be received from TransMontaigne Partners on the subordinated units, general partnership interest and incentive distribution rights of TransMontaigne Partners that we own.

(2)
In the case of the selected companies, the TEV/EBITDA multiple was calculated based on June 19, 2006 closing stock prices.

        None of the selected companies is either identical or directly comparable to TransMontaigne and any analysis of selected companies necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading of the selected companies.

Selected Precedent Transportation and Storage Transactions

        UBS analyzed certain information in 17 selected transportation and storage transactions in the oil and gas industry, each of which was announced since 2001. Financial data for the selected transactions were based on publicly available information, including publicly available research estimates and company filings, and for TransMontaigne, were based on estimates provided by our management. For each of the selected transactions, UBS calculated, where available, the ratio of total enterprise value to

30



the one-year forward estimated EBITDA and compared the results of these calculations with corresponding calculations for the acquisition of TransMontaigne by Morgan Stanley Capital Group.

        This analysis indicated the following implied ratios for the selected transactions as compared to the implied ratios for the acquisition of TransMontaigne by Morgan Stanley Capital Group:

 
  Offer for
Equity
($ mm)

  Total
Enterprise
Value ($ mm)

  Total
Enterprise
Value / One
Year
Forward
EBITDA

Selected Transactions:            
High           12.8
Low           8.0
Mean           10.0
Median           9.2
TransMontaigne at $11.35 Offer:            
  TransMontaigne with No Dropdowns   670.1   808.5   14.7
  TransMontaigne Pro Forma for Brownsville/River Dropdown(1)   670.1   713.7   16.1
  TransMontaigne Pro Forma for Brownsville/River and Southeast facilities Dropdown(1)   670.1   599.3   19.6

(1)
Change in enterprise value reflects after-tax cash proceeds from the assumed sale of the relevant facilities to TransMontaigne Partners ("Dropdown"), assumed to occur on December 31, 2005, and the expected accretion from TransMontaigne's ownership interests in TransMontaigne Partners and TransMontaigne GP. The resulting TEV/EBITDA multiple reflects both the TEV adjustments and lower EBITDA as a result of the asset sale(s). EBITDA excludes revenues and operating costs of TransMontaigne Partners' assets and includes distributions to be received from TransMontaigne Partners on the subordinated units, general partnership interest and incentive distribution rights of TransMontaigne Partners that we own.

        None of the selected precedent transactions is either identical or directly comparable to the merger and any analysis of selected precedent transactions necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition values of the companies concerned.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

        UBS performed two discounted cash flow analyses to calculate the estimated present value of the stand-alone unlevered free cash flow that we could generate over fiscal years 2007 through 2011 based on internal estimates of our management. UBS' first discounted cash flow analysis assumed the Brownsville/River Dropdown was completed on July 1, 2006 and the Southeast facilities Dropdown was completed on July 1, 2007. UBS estimated the total value of TransMontaigne using a "sum-of-parts" methodology for each of (1) the after-tax Dropdown cash proceeds and distributions we receive as a result of being the general partner of, and of its limited partnership interests in, TransMontaigne Partners and (2) the cash flows from our marketing and trading operations. In the case of our Dropdowns, general and limited partnership interests, UBS applied a terminal multiple of between 15.0x and 30.0x to value the distributions from TransMontaigne Partners and discounted interim and terminal year cash flows to present value using discount rates ranging from 6.5% to 8.5%. In the case of our marketing and trading operations, UBS applied terminal perpetuity growth rates of between (1.0%) and 1.0% and used discount rates ranging from 17.0% to 19.0% to present value the interim and terminal year cash flows.

31



        Also included in the marketing and trading valuation is the fair market value of inventories, product linefill and tank bottoms volumes, less anticipated changes in inventory levels due to our ongoing business operations, less the current balance of the working capital facility, all of which were based on estimates provided by our management, monetized at the end of the 5-year forecast period and discounted at the 10-year U.S. treasury rate of 5.0% as of June 19, 2006. UBS then calculated a range of consolidated enterprise values combining the two parts of our business by adding the enterprise values calculated for each segment using low, medium and high ranges for the terminal value drivers and discount rates used for each segment. This analysis indicated an implied per share equity reference range of $7.39 to $9.51 for TransMontaigne, as compared to the merger consideration of $11.35 per share.

        UBS also performed a second discounted cash flow analysis that did not assume the completion of the Dropdowns. For this analysis, UBS calculated a terminal value based on a range of multiples of estimated consolidated 2011 EBITDA and discounted to present value using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 9.0%. This analysis indicated an implied per share equity reference range of $4.60 to $5.73 for TransMontaigne, as compared to the merger consideration of $11.35 per share.

Other Factors

        In rendering its opinion, UBS also reviewed and considered other information and data, including:

Miscellaneous

        Under the terms of UBS' engagement, we have agreed to pay UBS a fee for rendering its financial fairness opinion, which was independent of the result of the opinion. In addition, we have agreed to reimburse UBS for its reasonable expenses, including fees and disbursements of its counsel, and to indemnify UBS against liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, relating to or arising out of its engagement as our financial advisor. UBS and its affiliates have in the past provided services to us unrelated to the proposed merger, for which services UBS and its affiliates have received compensation.

        We selected UBS as our financial advisor in connection with the merger because UBS is an internationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in similar transactions and due to the tail provision contained in our July 28, 2004 engagement letter with UBS that generally obligated us to pay UBS a fee if, prior to June 30, 2006, we entered into any business combination transaction with any of the parties specified in connection with that engagement. Prior to our engagement of UBS in July 2004, UBS had previously provided capital raising and other financial advisory services for TransMontaigne since February 2003, and as a result was familiar with our operations. UBS, as part of its investment banking services, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, strategic transactions, corporate restructurings, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

        In the ordinary course of business, UBS, its successors and affiliates may hold or trade, for their own accounts and the accounts of their customers, securities of TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group and their respective affiliates and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

32



Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

        In considering the recommendation of our board of directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that certain of our executive officers and directors may have interests in the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. Our board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in making its recommendation.

Severance and Termination Arrangements

        We entered into change in control agreements with Messrs. Anderson, Boutin, Carlson and Dickey on April 12, 2001, and with Randall J. Larson on May 1, 2002, each of whom is referred to as our "executive." The agreements provide the executives with compensation and benefits in the event of a change in control, which definition would include the completion of the merger.

        Under each change of control agreement, if we currently employ the executive on the date of an actual or threatened change in control, we will continue to employ the executive for the period commencing on the date of the actual change in control and ending on the last day of the term of the agreement; however, the then existing term will be automatically extended for an additional two years after the month in which the change in control occurs. In addition, if the executive is terminated prior to the date on which the change in control occurs and the executive reasonably demonstrates that such termination arose in connection with, or in anticipation of, a change in control, then the executive is entitled to the termination benefits discussed below.

        Under the agreements, if the executive's employment is terminated by the company for any reason other than death or cause, or if the executive resigns for good reason, we are required to pay the executive the following amounts:

        Each agreement provides that termination for cause means an uncured breach of the agreement, conviction of a felony, or willful dishonesty, or fraud upon, or material bad faith action with respect to TransMontaigne. Termination for "good reason" by the executive is defined to include, but not be limited to, the following events:

33


        Unlike the other agreements, Mr. Anderson's agreement also permits him to terminate the agreement, if he determines, in his sole discretion, that circumstances have so changed that he is not willing to continue in his position with TransMontaigne.

        In addition, under the agreements, we would be obligated to make tax reimbursement payments to any executive if any amounts he receives are subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, which taxes some payments that are contingent on a change-of-control within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The issues relating to the determination of the amount of tax for which we will be liable for reimbursement are complex and subject to varied interpretations. We are obligated to make a tax reimbursement payment to an executive in an amount which would put the executive in approximately the same financial position he would have been in if the excise tax did not apply to those payments. At the present time, the estimated amount of such tax reimbursement payments that we will be required to make to the executives is approximately $2.1 million, in the aggregate. This amount assumes the executives receive the lump sum cash termination payment as discussed below and is subject to change based on a variety of factors and variables outside our control.

        In order to provide the executives with an incentive to continue with the surviving corporation to promote an orderly transition, we intend to offer each of our executives the option to amend his agreement to add a "stay bonus" feature.

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group has not informed us as to which executive officers will be retained in their positions after the merger and which executive officers will be terminated, although it is presently contemplated that most of our executive officers will be retained. Under the above agreements, an executive would receive approximately the following estimated lump sum cash termination payment should that executive, following the merger, (1) have his employment terminated or terminate his employment for good reason (as defined in the applicable stay bonus agreement), and/or (2) fulfill his stay bonus obligation: Mr. Anderson, $1,410,489; Mr. Boutin, $780,489; Mr. Carlson, $780,489; Mr. Dickey, $1,153,748; and Mr. Larson, $1,153,748.

Payment for Stock Options and Restricted Stock.

        Our executive officers owned stock options to purchase an aggregate of 365,000 shares of our common stock and our executive officers and directors held 542,000 unvested shares of restricted stock, as of the record date. Our executive officers and directors own no warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. All of the unvested awards of restricted stock owned by our executive officers and directors will vest as a result of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, all outstanding stock options held by our executive officers will be canceled. In consideration for the cancellation, the executive officer will have the right to receive a cash payment with respect to each option equal to the product of (1) the excess, if any, of the merger consideration over the per share exercise price of the option, multiplied by (2) the aggregate number of shares of common stock then subject to the option. Payment of this cash consideration will be subject to all required tax withholdings. The executive officers and directors will receive payment of the merger consideration for all of their restricted stock in the same fashion as payment of the merger consideration is made for other outstanding shares of our common stock.

34



        The following table lists the payments that we will make upon completion of the merger to each of our executive officers and directors that are attributable to stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock, which amounts do not reflect tax withholdings we are required to collect.

 
  Vested Options
  Restricted Stock that will vest as a result of the Merger
  Totals
 
  Shares
  Value
  Shares
  Value
  Shares
  Value
Executive Officers:                              
  Donald H. Anderson   130,000   $ 878,000   121,000   $ 1,373,350   251,000   $ 2,251,350
  Frederick W. Boutin   30,000   $ 228,000   57,500   $ 652,625   87,500   $ 880,625
  Erik B. Carlson   30,000   $ 228,000   67,000   $ 760,450   97,000   $ 988,450
  William S. Dickey   100,000   $ 585,000   140,500   $ 1,594,675   240,500   $ 2,179,675
  Randall J. Larson   75,000   $ 472,500   130,500   $ 1,481,175   205,500   $ 1,953,675
Directors:                              
  Edwin H. Morgens         7,000   $ 79,450   7,000   $ 79,450
  Wayne W. Murdy         7,000   $ 79,450   7,000   $ 79,450
  Walter P. Schuetze         11,500   $ 130,525   11,500   $ 130,525

Vesting of Restricted Partnership Units

        In addition, unvested restricted common limited partnership units, which we refer to as the "common units," awarded to our executive officers and directors under the TransMontaigne Partners' equity incentive plan will vest as a result of the merger. Although vesting is accelerated, these common units, like all other common units of TransMontaigne Partners, are not affected by the merger and have no right to receive the merger consideration. Under the terms of the TransMontaigne Partners' equity incentive plan, the number of restricted common units that will vest upon consummation of the merger for each executive officer of TransMontaigne is: Mr. Anderson, 13,250; Mr. Boutin, 8,875; Mr. Carlson, 8,875; Mr. Dickey, 13,250; and Mr. Larson, 13,250.

Continued Benefits

        In connection with the merger, our employees immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be provided benefits (other than equity or equity-based compensation plans) until twelve months after the effective time that are, in the aggregate, no less favorable than the benefits provided under our benefit plans in which such employees participated immediately prior to the effective time. All of our executive officers currently participate in our benefit plans, which include medical, dental and vision coverage, vacation, prescription drug benefits, voluntary term life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, long term disability insurance, flexible spending accounts, 401(k), educational assistance, extended sick leave and business travel accident insurance.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

        Pursuant to the merger agreement, for six years after the effective time, the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation will contain provisions no less favorable with respect to indemnification and advancement of expenses for matters occurring prior to the effective time of the merger than those set forth in our certificate of incorporation as in effect on June 22, 2006.

        The merger agreement also provides that Morgan Stanley Capital Group and the surviving corporation will maintain in effect for six years from the effective time of the merger directors' and officers' liability insurance with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the merger covering each of the indemnified parties described above, on terms with respect to coverage, amount and advancement of expenses no less favorable than those provided in the directors' and

35



officers' insurance maintained by TransMontaigne as of June 22, 2006. However, in no event will the surviving corporation or Morgan Stanley Capital Group be required to expend an amount per year greater than 250% of the annual premium in effect for TransMontaigne for such policies as of June 22, 2006. If the amount of the annual premium necessary to maintain or procure such insurance coverage exceeds such maximum amount, the surviving corporation will maintain or procure, for such six year period, directors' and officers' insurance providing the greatest coverage then available for an annual premium equal to that maximum amount. Morgan Stanley Capital Group may satisfy its obligations by purchasing a "tail" insurance policy with a claim period of at least six years from the effective time.

        In addition, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and the surviving corporation will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified parties identified in the first paragraph of this section against all reasonable expenses, losses or amounts paid in settlement in respect of any threatened, pending or completed claim or proceeding arising out of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of TransMontaigne, or arising out of acts or omissions occurring on or prior to the effective time of the merger.

        In the event of any consolidation, merger or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Morgan Stanley Capital Group or the surviving corporation, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and the surviving corporation will be required to make proper provision so that any successor of Morgan Stanley Capital Group or the surviving corporation will assume the obligations set forth above.


The Merger

        This section of the proxy statement describes material aspects of the proposed merger. Although we believe that the description covers the material terms of the merger, this summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You are encouraged to carefully read this entire proxy statement and the other documents we refer you to for a more complete understanding of the merger. In addition, we incorporate important business and financial information into this proxy statement by reference. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled "Where Stockholders Can Find More Information" on page 60.


Effective Time of Merger

        If the merger agreement is approved by the requisite vote of stockholders and the other conditions to the merger are satisfied, or waived to the extent permitted pursuant to the merger agreement, the merger will be consummated and become effective at the time the certificate of merger is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at any later time as we, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co agree upon and specify in the certificate of merger. If our stockholders adopt the merger agreement, the parties intend to complete the merger as soon as practicable thereafter. Because the merger is subject to various conditions, including conditions that are not within the exclusive control of TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group, the exact timing of the merger cannot be determined. See "—Regulatory Matters" on page 38.

        We or Morgan Stanley Capital Group may terminate the merger agreement prior to the effective time of the merger in specified circumstances, whether before or after the adoption of the merger agreement by stockholders. Additional details on the termination of the merger agreement are described in "The Merger Agreement—Termination" beginning on page 55.

        At the effective time of the merger, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will own 100% of our equity securities. In addition:

36



Payment of Merger Consideration and Surrender of Stock Certificates

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group will designate a paying agent to make the cash payments contemplated by the merger agreement. Prior to the effective time of the merger, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will deposit, or cause to be deposited, in trust with the paying agent funds in an aggregate amount sufficient to make the cash payments described above to all stockholders in respect of their shares of our common stock.

        No later than 10 days after the effective time, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will cause the paying agent to send you a letter of transmittal and instructions advising you how to surrender your certificates in exchange for the merger consideration. You should not forward your stock certificates to the paying agent without a letter of transmittal, and you should not return your stock certificates with the enclosed proxy.

        The paying agent will pay you your merger consideration and your certificates will be cancelled after you have (1) surrendered your certificates to the paying agent, together with such letter of transmittal and (2) provided to the paying agent any other items specified by the letter of transmittal. Any stockholder that has not complied with clauses (1) and (2) set forth above six months after the effective time of the merger shall thereafter look solely to Morgan Stanley Capital Group with respect to the merger consideration payable or issuable upon due surrender of their certificates. Interest will not be paid or accrue in respect of cash payments of merger consideration. The paying agent shall be entitled to reduce the amount of any merger consideration paid to you by any applicable withholding taxes.

        The merger agreement provides that the warrant to purchase our common stock granted on November 23, 2004 held by Morgan Stanley Capital Group will become exercisable for cash in accordance with its terms.

        In the event of a transfer of ownership of shares of our stock that is not registered in our transfer records, a check for the cash that such holder has the right to receive in respect of such holder's shares of stock formerly represented by such certificate may be issued to a transferee if the certificate representing such shares is presented to the paying agent, accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect such transfer and by evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid.

        If any certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by TransMontaigne, the posting by such person of a bond, in such reasonable amount as we may direct, as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such certificate, the paying agent will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate, the merger consideration, without any interest thereon.

        At the effective time of the merger, we will close our stock transfer books. After that time, if you present common stock or preferred stock certificates to us, we will exchange them for cash as described in this section.

        After the merger, you will cease to have any rights as a stockholder of TransMontaigne, other than the right to surrender your certificate in exchange for payment of the merger consideration.

37




Regulatory Matters

        The HSR Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder required that Morgan Stanley Capital Group and TransMontaigne file notification and report forms with respect to the merger and related transactions with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the "FTC". The parties thereafter were required to observe a waiting period before completing the merger. TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group filed the necessary forms with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission on June 28, 2006. On July 12, 2006, TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group were granted early termination of the waiting period. The Department of Justice or the FTC, as well as a state or private person, may challenge the merger at any time before or after its completion.

        We are unaware of any material federal, state or local regulatory requirements or approvals required for the completion of the merger.


Anticipated Accounting Treatment

        The merger is intended to be accounted for by Morgan Stanley Capital Group as a purchase under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Accordingly, it is expected that Morgan Stanley Capital Group's carrying value in the assets and liabilities of TransMontaigne for accounting purposes will be adjusted to fair value upon completion of the merger.


Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to holders of TransMontaigne common stock. This discussion is based upon the Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, and judicial and administrative rulings and decisions in effect on the date hereof. These authorities may change at any time, possibly retroactively, and any such change could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. No ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has been requested with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences described herein and accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with the discussion herein. In addition, this discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality or foreign jurisdiction, and accordingly, is not a comprehensive description of all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to any particular holder of TransMontaigne stock.

        This discussion assumes that holders hold their shares of our common stock as capital assets and does not address the tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular stockholder subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law, including but not limited to:

38


Characterization of the Merger

        For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger of Merger Co with and into TransMontaigne will be treated as a taxable transaction to holders of TransMontaigne stock and will not be treated as a taxable transaction to TransMontaigne.

        A holder of TransMontaigne stock will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount of cash received in the merger and such holder's adjusted tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if at the time of the merger the holder had a holding period in its TransMontaigne stock of more than one year. Gain or loss must be determined separately for each block of TransMontaigne stock (i.e., stock acquired at the same cost in a single transaction).

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

        Certain noncorporate holders of TransMontaigne stock may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding, at applicable rates (currently 28%), on cash payments received pursuant to the merger. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a holder who furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that the holder is not subject to backup withholding on IRS Form W-9 or a substantially similar form or is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. If a holder does not provide its correct taxpayer identification number or fails to provide the certification described above, the IRS may impose a penalty on the holder, and amounts received by the holder pursuant to the merger may be subject to backup withholding. Amounts withheld, if any, are generally not an additional tax and may be refunded or credited against the holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the holder furnishes the required information to the IRS.

        ALTHOUGH THE FOREGOING ARE THE MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES GENERALLY APPLICABLE TO THE MERGER, THIS DISCUSSION DOES NOT ADDRESS EVERY U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX ISSUE WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE TO A PARTICULAR STOCKHOLDER. EACH STOCKHOLDER IS ENCOURAGED TO CONSULT HIS OR HER OWN TAX ADVISOR TO DETERMINE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH STOCKHOLDER, IN LIGHT OF HIS OR HER PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, OF THE DISPOSITION OF TRANSMONTAIGNE COMMON STOCK PURSUANT TO THE MERGER.


Appraisal Rights

        Under Delaware law, you are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger. All references in this summary of appraisal rights to a "stockholder" or "holders of shares of stock" are to the record holder or holders of those shares.

        If the merger is consummated, dissenting stockholders who follow the procedures described below within the appropriate time periods will be entitled to have their shares of stock appraised by a court and to receive the "fair value" of such shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, in cash as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, as determined by the court, in lieu of the consideration that such stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to the merger agreement. These rights are known as appraisal rights.

39


        The discussion of the provisions set forth below is not a complete summary regarding your appraisal rights under Delaware law and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the relevant provisions of Delaware law, which are attached to this proxy statement as Appendix C. Stockholders intending to exercise appraisal rights should carefully review Appendix C. Failure to follow precisely any of the statutory procedures set forth in Appendix C may result in the termination or waiver of these rights.

        Under Section 262 of the DGCL, if a merger is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, as in the case of the merger agreement, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders if appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262 of the DGCL. This proxy statement constitutes the required notice, and we attach a copy of Section 262 of the DGCL to this proxy statement as Appendix C.

        In order to exercise your appraisal rights effectively, you must satisfy each of the following primary requirements:


        If you fail to comply with any of the above conditions or otherwise fail to comply with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL, you will have no appraisal rights with respect to your shares.

        Neither voting (in person or by proxy) against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262 of the DGCL. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote.

        The address for purposes of making an appraisal demand is:

        Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, any stockholder who has satisfied the requirements of Section 262 may deliver to us a written demand for a statement listing the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares.

        A person having a beneficial interest in shares of TransMontaigne stock that are held of record as of the record date in the name of another person, such as a broker, fiduciary, depositary or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps summarized herein properly and in a timely manner to perfect their appraisal rights. If the shares of TransMontaigne stock are owned of record by a person other than the beneficial owner, including a broker, fiduciary (such as a trustee, guardian or custodian), depositary or other nominee, such demand must be executed by or for the record owner. If the shares of TransMontaigne stock are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, such demand must be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for

40



appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner and expressly disclose the fact that, in exercising the demand, such person is acting as agent for the record owner. If a stockholder holds shares of TransMontaigne stock through a bank or broker who in turn holds the shares through a central securities depository nominee such as Cede & Co., a demand for appraisal of such shares must be made by or on behalf of the depository nominee and must identify the depository nominee as record holder.

        Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger (but not thereafter), either TransMontaigne or any stockholder who has complied with the required conditions of Section 262 and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of his or her shares. We have no present intention to file such a petition if demand for appraisal is made and stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that we will file such a petition or that we will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of such shares. Accordingly, holders of TransMontaigne stock who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary to properly demand their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262.

        Upon the filing of any petition by a stockholder in accordance with Section 262, service of a copy must be made upon TransMontaigne, which must, within 20 days after service, file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed, a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by TransMontaigne. If a petition is filed by TransMontaigne, the petition must be accompanied by the verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the court, will give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to TransMontaigne and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated, and notice will also be given by publishing a notice at least one week before the day of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware, or such publication as the court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication must be approved by the court, and the costs thereof will be borne by us.

        If a petition for an appraisal is filed in a timely fashion, after a hearing on the petition, the court will determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights and will appraise the shares owned by these stockholders, determining the fair value of such shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. The court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

        We do not anticipate offering more than the merger consideration to any stockholder exercising appraisal rights and reserve the right to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that, for purposes of Section 262, the "fair value" of a share of TransMontaigne stock is less than the merger consideration that would otherwise be received for that stock. In determining "fair value", the court is required to take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc. the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that "proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court" should be considered and that "[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company." The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that in making this determination of fair value the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as of the date of the merger which throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 provides that fair value is to be "exclusive of any

41



element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger." In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a "narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value," but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court construed Section 262 to mean that "elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered."

        In light of the case law interpretations noted above, stockholders considering seeking appraisal of their shares should note that the fair value of their shares determined under Section 262 could be more, the same or less than the consideration they would receive pursuant to the merger agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares. The costs of the appraisal proceeding may be determined by the court and assessed against the parties as the court deems equitable under the circumstances. Upon application of a dissenting stockholder, the court may order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any dissenting stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal. In the absence of a determination or assessment, each party bears his, her or its own expenses.

        Any stockholder who has duly demanded appraisal in compliance with Section 262 will not, after the effective time of the merger, be entitled to vote for any purpose the shares subject to the appraisal demand or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on such shares, except for dividends or distributions declared by our board of directors and payable to stockholders of record at a date prior to the effective time of the merger.

        At any time within 60 days after the effective time of the merger, any stockholder will have the right to withdraw his demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered in the merger agreement. After this period, a stockholder may withdraw his demand for appraisal and receive payment for his shares as provided in the merger agreement only with the consent of TransMontaigne. In addition, no petition timely filed in the court demanding appraisal may be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the court, which approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the court deems just. If no petition for appraisal is filed with the court within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, stockholders' rights to appraisal (if available) will cease and all stockholders will be entitled to receive the consideration offered pursuant to the merger agreement. Inasmuch as we have no obligation to file such a petition, any stockholder who desires a petition to be filed is advised to file it on a timely basis.

        Failure by any stockholder to comply fully with the procedures described above and set forth in Appendix C to this proxy statement may result in termination or waiver of a stockholder's appraisal rights.


Conduct of Our Business if the Merger is Not Consummated

        If we do not consummate the merger, our board of directors expects to seek to retain our current management team, although there can be no assurance it will be successful in doing so. There are no plans in such circumstances to operate our business in a manner substantially different than presently operated.

42



The Merger Agreement

        This section of the proxy statement summarizes the material provisions of the merger agreement. The following summary is qualified entirely by reference to the complete text of the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement and incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. We encourage you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety.

        We have attached the merger agreement to this proxy statement to provide you with information regarding its terms. The merger agreement is not intended to be a source of any other information about the parties.

        The representations, warranties and covenants made by the parties in the merger agreement and discussed below, are qualified by information in the confidential disclosure schedules we provided to Morgan Stanley Capital Group in connection with the execution of the merger agreement, and are otherwise subject to important limitations agreed to by the parties to the merger agreement in connection with negotiating its terms. Certain representations and warranties may have been used by the parties to allocate risks among the respective parties to the merger agreement, including where the parties do not have complete knowledge of all facts, instead of establishing such matters as facts. Furthermore, the representations and warranties may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties, which may be different from any particular investor's standards of what constitutes important information. These representations and warranties may or may not have been accurate as of any specific date and do not purport to be accurate as of the date this proxy statement is distributed to you. Accordingly, representations and warranties should not be relied upon as statements of factual information. You are not third-party beneficiaries under the merger agreement and should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of TransMontaigne or its subsidiaries. None of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement will have any legal effect among the parties to the merger agreement after the closing of the merger.


General

        Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement and in accordance with the DGCL, Merger Co shall be merged with and into TransMontaigne. The separate corporate existence of Merger Co shall cease and TransMontaigne shall continue as the surviving corporation, wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Capital Group.

        At the effective time of the merger, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws will be amended in their entirety as set forth in the merger agreement, and the same shall be the certificate of incorporation and by-laws, respectively, of the surviving corporation until thereafter amended in accordance with their terms and applicable law.

        The directors of Merger Co immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be the initial directors of the surviving corporation and the officers of TransMontaigne immediately prior to the effective time shall be the initial officers of the surviving corporation, in each case to hold office in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the surviving corporation.


Treatment of Our Stock in the Merger

        At the effective time of the merger, by virtue of the merger agreement and without any additional action on the part of our stockholders:

43


        At the effective time of the merger, all shares of our capital stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall be cancelled, retired and will cease to exist. Each certificate previously representing any such shares shall thereafter represent the right to receive the cash consideration described above.

        We will also take all actions necessary to ensure that, at the effective time of the merger:

        Under the terms of the merger agreement and applicable Delaware law, shares of our common stock that are outstanding immediately prior to the effective time and that are held by any stockholder who takes the actions specified in Section 262 of the DGCL to properly demand such stockholder's rights of appraisal, will not be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration. Such stockholders will be entitled to receive payment of the fair value of their shares in accordance with the provisions set forth under Delaware law. See "The Merger—Appraisal Rights" beginning on page 39.


Representations and Warranties

        We have made customary representations and warranties to Merger Co and Morgan Stanley Capital Group that are subject to, in some cases, specified exceptions and qualifications contained in the merger agreement or in the disclosure schedules delivered in connection with the merger agreement. These representations and warranties, which will not survive the effective time of the merger, relate to, among other matters:

44


        Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co have also made customary representations and warranties to us subject to, in some cases, specified exceptions and qualifications contained in the merger agreement or in the disclosure schedules delivered in connection with the merger agreement. These representations and warranties, which will not survive the effective time of the merger, relate to, among other matters:

45


        Certain aspects of the representations and warranties of the parties are qualified by the concepts of "material adverse effect." A material adverse effect means a "TransMontaigne Partners material adverse effect" or any event, circumstance, development, change or effect that, either individually or in the aggregate, is or would be materially adverse to our business, condition, financial or otherwise, or results of operations, other than:

46


        The merger agreement defines a "TransMontaigne Partners material adverse effect" as generally, the bankruptcy, insolvency or dissolution of TransMontaigne Partners or TransMontaigne GP, the resignation of TransMontaigne GP as the general partner of TransMontaigne Partners or the adoption of any law, or the taking of any other action, by any governmental authority that would, or would reasonably be expected to, prevent or materially hinder or delay, or materially increase the cost to consummate, any proposed sale, contribution or other transfer of assets from Morgan Stanley Capital Group or TransMontaigne to TransMontaigne Partners, with certain exceptions, or the occurrence of any circumstances that would permit the removal of TransMontaigne GP as the General Partner of TransMontaigne Partners or the sale of substantially all of the assets of TransMontaigne Partners or TransMontaigne GP.


Conduct of Business by TransMontaigne Before the Merger

        The merger agreement provides that, between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger, unless Morgan Stanley Capital Group gives its prior written consent, we will:


Covenants of TransMontaigne

        The merger agreement also provides specific covenants relating to our activities from the date of the merger agreement until the effective time of the merger. These covenants provide, subject to certain exceptions, that we will not, and will not permit any of our subsidiaries to, without Morgan Stanley Capital Group's prior written consent:

47


48


Acquisition Proposals

        The merger agreement prohibits us from, directly or indirectly:

49


        However, if, prior to the adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders, we receive an acquisition proposal by any third party and our board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with our legal counsel and financial advisor, that the acquisition proposal could reasonably lead to a superior proposal and that the failure to participate in discussions with the third party regarding the acquisition proposal could result in a breach in our board of director's fiduciary obligations or any applicable law, we may, subject to certain restrictions, furnish non-public information to the third party making the acquisition proposal (provided the third party has entered into a mutual non-disclosure agreement with us on terms that are no less favorable to us than those set forth in our mutual non-disclosure agreements with Morgan Stanley Capital Group) and participate in discussions and negotiations regarding such acquisition proposal. We may not enter into any confidentiality agreements with any third party which prohibits us from providing such information to Morgan Stanley Capital Group.

        We must advise Morgan Stanley Capital Group within one business day of our receipt of any acquisition proposal or any inquiry that could reasonably be expected to lead to an acquisition proposal. The notification must specify the material terms and conditions of the acquisition proposal, identify the party making the acquisition proposal or inquiry, include a copy of all written materials provided to us in connection with the acquisition proposal and provide Morgan Stanley Capital Group with a copy of any information provided by us to the third party that has not previously been provided to Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Similarly, we must notify Morgan Stanley Capital Group of any material modifications to the terms of the acquisition proposal and provide to Morgan Stanley Capital Group all written materials subsequently provided to or by us in connection with the acquisition proposal.

        As used in the merger agreement a "superior proposal" means any written acquisition proposal that relates to an acquisition by a third party of either (1) more than 50% of our outstanding shares of preferred and common stock pursuant to a tender offer, merger or otherwise or (2) more than 50% of our consolidated assets, and is on terms that;


Other Obligations of the Parties

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co have also undertaken certain obligations and responsibilities under the merger agreement including, but not limited to, the covenants described below.

50



Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance

        The charter documents of the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries will contain provisions providing for indemnification of and advancement of expenses to directors and officers no less favorable to the officers and directors than those set forth in our charter documents (or the charter documents of the relevant subsidiary) as of June 22, 2006, for six years after the effective time of the merger. Similarly, the surviving corporation will, with certain exceptions, either obtain a pre-paid directors' and officers' liability insurance "tail" policy with a claims period of at least six years from the effective time of the merger and a scope at least as favorable as our existing policies, or maintain our existing officers' and directors' liability insurance policies. In no event will the surviving corporation or Morgan Stanley Capital Group be required to expend an amount per year greater than 250% of the annual premium in effect for us for such policies as of June 22, 2006.

Employee Benefits Matters

        For a period of one year after the effective time of the merger, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will honor the terms of all employment agreements and pay or provide the benefits required thereunder in accordance with their terms and will provide salary, discretionary bonus (excluding equity or equity based incentive awards) and employee benefits that are no less favorable, in the aggregate, than those provided to our employees immediately prior to the effective time of the merger.

        Following the effective time of the merger, our employees will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, receive credit for years of service accrued or deemed accrued prior to the effective time of the merger for all purposes under any employee benefit plan, program or arrangement established or maintained by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, the surviving corporation or any of their respective subsidiaries.

        In addition to the above covenants, the parties have undertaken certain additional obligations and responsibilities under the merger agreement including, but not limited to, the covenants described below.

Financing

        The merger agreement contains several covenants relating to the respective obligations of each of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Merger Co and TransMontaigne with respect to the financing necessary for Merger Co to consummate the merger and the terms of such financing. With respect to our obligations to cooperate with Morgan Stanley Capital Group in obtaining the financing, the merger agreement provides that:

Further Action; Reasonable Best Efforts; Notice of Certain Events

        The merger agreement provides that each of the parties will use its reasonable best efforts to:

51


Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing

        In addition, each of the parties agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to make the appropriate filings required by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, referred to as the "HSR Act," with respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and to supply any additional information and documentary material that may be requested pursuant to the HSR Act. No additional information and documentary materials were requested under the HSR Act and TransMontaigne and Morgan Stanley Capital Group received early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act on July 12, 2006.

        In the event a formal, written second request for documentation or information was issued to the parties under the HSR Act, the expiration date of the merger agreement would have been automatically extended until January 31, 2007 and the parties had agreed to:

        However, the parties would not have been required to agree to make any of the above actions, if to do so would have resulted in a divestiture of stock or other assets having an aggregate fair market value of at least $50 million, or another operational restriction that would have been expected, in the reasonable, good faith judgment of the board of directors of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, to have had an adverse financial impact on Morgan Stanley Capital Group and its affiliates (including TransMontaigne, TransMontaigne LP, TransMontaigne Partners and their affiliates) after the closing, taken as a whole, in excess of $50 million. Upon a final determination by the government antitrust authority that taking or agreeing to take any of the actions set forth in this paragraph was required to consummate the merger, Morgan Stanley Capital Group would have been entitled to terminate the merger agreement and pay a $25 million reverse termination fee to TransMontaigne, which amount

52



included the $7.5 million Morgan Stanley Capital Group advanced to us upon execution of the merger agreement. See "—Termination Fee Under SemGroup Agreement" below.

Notes

        It is a condition to closing the merger that provision shall have been made with respect to our notes to either redeem the notes, or amend their terms to permit our notes to remain outstanding following the effective time of the merger. Under the terms of the merger agreement, at the written request of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, we agreed to commence a tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to any or all of our notes in accordance with the written terms and conditions provided by Morgan Stanley Capital Group and applicable law. Morgan Stanley Capital Group has agreed to reimburse us for any reasonable out-of-pocket costs, fees and expenses and will indemnify our representatives for any other liabilities incurred in connection with the tender offer and consent solicitation.

Public Announcements

        The parties have agreed to consult with each other before issuing any press release or otherwise making any public statements with respect to the merger agreement or the merger, except to the extent public disclosure is required by applicable law or the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.

Resignations

        We have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to obtain the resignations, effective as of the effective time of the merger, of those directors of TransMontaigne designated by Morgan Stanley Capital Group.

Guarantee of Performance

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group has unconditionally guaranteed the full and timely performance by Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co of each of their obligations under the merger agreement.

Termination Fee Under SemGroup Agreement

        The merger agreement provides that as soon as practicable following the execution of the merger agreement, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will pay TransMontaigne $7.5 million, which we received on June 23, 2006. We are obligated to reimburse Morgan Stanley Capital Group the $7.5 million advance upon termination of the merger agreement, unless the merger agreement is terminated for any of the following reasons (in which case reimbursement is not required):

53



Conditions to the Completion of the Merger

        The respective obligations of each party to effect the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, of the following conditions:


Conditions to the Obligations of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co

        The obligations of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co to consummate the merger are further subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing, on or prior to the closing date, of the following additional conditions:

54


Conditions to our Obligations

        Our obligations to consummate the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing, on or prior to the closing date, of the following additional conditions:


Termination

        The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger by our board of directors or Morgan Stanley Capital Group, as applicable, whether before or after our stockholders have approved the merger agreement at the special meeting of stockholders, under the following circumstances:

55



Fees and Expenses

        Except as set forth below, all expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the merger is consummated. However, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and TransMontaigne have each agreed to pay the other party a termination fee under specified circumstances.

        We have agreed to pay Morgan Stanley Capital Group a termination fee of $15 million:

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group will pay us a termination fee of $7.5 million no later than two days following the date of termination if we terminate the merger agreement following a breach on the part of either Morgan Stanley Capital Group or Merger Co of any of their representations and warranties or covenants contained in the merger and such breach has not been, or cannot be, cured within 30 days after notice of such breach and, at the time of termination, our representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement have been met sufficient to satisfy the condition precedent to Morgan Stanley Capital Group and Merger Co's obligation to close that relates to our representations, warranties and covenants. In addition, Morgan Stanley Capital Group will pay us a reverse termination fee of $25 million, which includes a credit for the $7.5 million previously advanced to us by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, under the following circumstances:

56


        The payment of the termination fee shall not limit any party's liability for damages resulting from a willful breach of the merger agreement.


Amendments and Waivers

        The merger agreement may be amended only with the consent of all parties and any party may extend the time for the performance of any obligation or other act of any other party, waive any inaccuracy in the representations and warranties of any other party and waive compliance with any agreement of any other party or any condition to its own obligations contained in the merger agreement.


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

        The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership as of July 17, 2006 of our stock, by class, by (i) each of our executive officers, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each person known by us to own beneficially more than five percent of the outstanding shares of any class of our capital stock and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. The information set forth below is based solely upon information furnished by such individuals or contained in filings made by such beneficial owners with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the "SEC". Unless stated otherwise, the address for each of our executive officers and directors is 1670 Broadway, Suite 3100, Denver, CO 80202.

        The numbers of shares set forth in the table below refer to beneficial ownership and are not indicative of the voting power with respect to such shares.

        The calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 53,031,949 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 17, 2006. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares. To our knowledge, except under applicable community property laws or as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned. Shares of common stock underlying outstanding warrants or options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 17, 2006 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of

57



beneficial ownership of the person holding those options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of beneficial ownership of any other person.

 
  Common Stock
 
Beneficial Owner

  Number of
Shares

  Percent of
Class(1)

 
Cortlandt S. Dietler(2)   1,775,517   3.4 %
Donald H. Anderson(3)   422,765   *  
Harold R. Logan, Jr.(4)   327,268   *  
William S. Dickey(5)   398,900   *  
Randall J. Larson(6)   305,586   *  
Erik B. Carlson(7)   199,437   *  
Frederick W. Boutin(8)   286,258   *  
John A. Hill   143,235   *  
Bryan H. Lawrence(9)   3,267,637   6.2 %
Edwin H. Morgens(10)   262,635   *  
Wayne W. Murdy(11)   14,627   *  
Walter P. Schuetze(12)   25,000   *  
Barclays Global Investors Japan Trust and Banking Company Limited(13)   5,409,448   10.2 %
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.(14)   3,284,540   6.2 %
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.(15)   3,033,221   5.7 %
Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.(16)   5,544,775   9.5 %
Yorktown Energy Partners III, L.P.(17)   3,190,391   6.0 %
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (12 Persons)(18)   7,428,865   13.9 %

*
Less than 1% of the shares of common stock deemed outstanding.

(1)
Calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding that are subject to options, warrants, rights or other securities having conversion privileges owned by such person that are exercisable within sixty days of the date of this table (July 17, 2006) are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of beneficial ownership of any other person.

(2)
Includes 2,000 shares held by Mr. Dietler's spouse, as to which Mr. Dietler disclaims beneficial ownership.

(3)
Includes 130,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 121,000 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(4)
Includes 30,000 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options.

(5)
Includes 60,000 shares owned by DQ Investment Group, a family general partnership, of which Mr. Dickey is a general partner. Mr. Dickey disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and 140,500 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(6)
Includes 75,000 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and 130,500 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(7)
Includes 550 shares held in an IRA for the benefit of Mr. Carlson's spouse, and 3,840 shares and 3,725 shares held in trust for Mr. Carlson's son and daughter, respectively, as to all of which Mr. Carlson disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 30,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 67,000 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

58


(8)
Includes 30,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 57,500 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(9)
Includes 3,190,391 shares reported as beneficially owned by Yorktown Partners LLC. Mr. Lawrence is a founder and an affiliate of Yorktown Partners LLC and disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

(10)
Includes 199,806 shares held by the Edwin Morgens and Linda Morgens 1993 Trust. Mr. Morgens disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 7,000 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(11)
Includes 7,000 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(12)
Includes 11,500 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting.

(13)
Represents shares held by Barclays Global Investors Japan Trust and Banking Company Limited ("Barclays Japan") in trust accounts for the economic benefit of the beneficiaries of those accounts. Includes 4,928,165 shares beneficially owned by Barclays Global Investors, N.A. ("Barclays Global"), of which Barclays Global has sole voting power over 4,522,720 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,928,165 shares, and 481,283 shares beneficially owned by Barclays Global Fund Advisors ("Barclays Fund"), of which Barclays Fund has sole voting and dispositive power. The address of Barclays Japan is Ebisu Prime Square Tower, 8th Floor, 1-1-39 Hiroo Shibauya-Ku, Tokyo 150-0012 Japan. The address of Barclays Global and Barclays Fund is 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.

(14)
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. ("Dimensional") is a registered investment advisor that furnishes investment advice to four registered investment companies, and serves as investment manager to other commingled group trusts and separate accounts, collectively referred to as the "Funds." All shares reported as beneficially owned by Dimensional are owned by its advisory clients, none of which, to the knowledge of Dimensional, owns more than 5% of our outstanding shares. In its roles as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional possesses investment and/or voting power over the shares held by the Funds and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the shares held by the Funds. The address of Dimensional is address 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401.

(15)
The number of shares shown as beneficially owned by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. ("Holdings") consists of 3,664 shares owned by Lehman Brothers Inc. ("LBI") and 3,029,557 shares beneficially owned by LB I Group Inc. ("Group"). Group is a wholly owned subsidiary of LBI which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings. The address of Holdings, LBI and Group is 745 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019. LBI has informed us that no individual natural person holds voting and investment power over such shares.

(16)
Includes 5,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants owned by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, 400 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated ("MSCI") and 44,375 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Morgan Stanley DW Inc. ("MSDW"). Each of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, MSCI and MSDW are wholly owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware Corporation. The address of Morgan Stanley is 1585 Broadway, New York, NY 10036. The address of Morgan Stanley Capital Group is 2000 Westchester Avenue, Floor 01, Purchase, NY 10577.

(17)
Yorktown Partners LLC, as investment manager to Yorktown Energy Partners III, L.P. as an agent through an irrevocable power of attorney, is deemed to beneficially own an aggregate of 3,190,391 shares of common stock. The address of Yorktown Partners LLC and Yorktown Energy Partners III, L.P. is 410 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022. The natural person who holds voting and investor power over such shares is, to our knowledge, Peter A. Leidel.

(18)
Of such 7,428,865 shares, (a) 395,000 represent shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, (b) 546,000 represent shares of restricted stock subject to vesting, and (c) directors and executive officers disclaim beneficial ownership with respect to 3,467,392 shares.

59



Future Stockholder Proposals

        We intend to hold an annual meeting in 2006 only if the merger is not completed. If we hold such an annual meeting, it will be more than 30 days after the anniversary date of the 2005 annual meeting. In order to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy materials for our 2006 annual meeting, if such meeting is held, written notice of any stockholder proposal must be received by us a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials for such annual meeting.


Multiple Stockholders Sharing One Address

        We are sending only one proxy statement to stockholders that share a single address unless we received contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as "householding," is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if any stockholder residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate annual report or proxy statement in the future, they may telephone Erik B. Carlson at (303) 626-8200 or write to TransMontaigne Inc. at 1670 Broadway, Suite 3100, Denver, Colorado 80202, Attention: Erik B. Carlson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. If you are receiving multiple copies of our annual report and proxy statement, you can request householding by contacting us in the same manner and if you did not receive an individual copy of this proxy statement, you can obtain a copy by contacting us in the same manner.


Where Stockholders Can Find Further Information

        We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information contain additional information about us and will be made available for inspection and copying at our executive offices during regular business hours by any of our stockholders or a representative of a stockholder as so designated in writing.

        We make available on our website (www.transmontaigne.com) under "Investor Relations—SEC Filings," free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on 10-Q, current reports on 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with the SEC.

        Our stockholders may also read and copy any reports, statements or other information filed by us at the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. Our filings with the SEC are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the SEC located at http://www.sec.gov.

        The proxy statement does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is not lawful to make any offer or solicitation in that jurisdiction. The delivery of this proxy statement should not create an implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this proxy statement or that the information herein is correct as of any later date.

        Stockholders should not rely on information other than that contained in this proxy statement, including the appendices to this proxy statement. We have not authorized anyone to provide information that is different from that contained in this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated July 25, 2006. No assumption should be made that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than that date, and the mailing of this proxy statement will not create any implication to the contrary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of any material change in any of the information previously disclosed, we will, where relevant and if required by applicable law, update such information through a supplement to this proxy statement to the extent necessary.

60



APPENDIX A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

BY AND AMONG

MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP INC.,

BUFFALO MERGER SUB INC.

AND

TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

DATED AS OF JUNE 22, 2006



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
ARTICLE I.    THE MERGER   A-1
 
Section 1.01

 

The Merger

 

A-1
  Section 1.02   Closing   A-1
  Section 1.03   Effective Time   A-1
  Section 1.04   Effect of the Merger   A-1
  Section 1.05   Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws   A-1
  Section 1.06   Directors and Officers   A-2

ARTICLE II.    CONVERSION OF SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES

 

A-2
 
Section 2.01

 

Conversion of Securities

 

A-2
  Section 2.02   Exchange of Certificates   A-3
  Section 2.03   Stock Transfer Books   A-5
  Section 2.04   Options, Warrants and Restricted Stock   A-5
  Section 2.05   Dissenting Shares   A-6

ARTICLE III.    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

 

A-6
 
Section 3.01

 

Organization and Qualification

 

A-7
  Section 3.02   Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws   A-7
  Section 3.03   Capitalization   A-7
  Section 3.04   Authority Relative to This Agreement   A-9
  Section 3.05   No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents   A-10
  Section 3.06   Permits; Compliance   A-11
  Section 3.07   SEC Filings; Financial Statements; Undisclosed Liabilities   A-12
  Section 3.08   Affiliate Transactions   A-13
  Section 3.09   Absence of Certain Changes or Events   A-13
  Section 3.10   Absence of Litigation   A-13
  Section 3.11   Employee Benefit Plans   A-13
  Section 3.12   Labor and Employment Matters   A-15
  Section 3.13   Real Property   A-15
  Section 3.14   Intellectual Property   A-16
  Section 3.15   Taxes   A-16
  Section 3.16   Environmental Matters   A-17
  Section 3.17   Insurance   A-18
  Section 3.18   Specified Contracts   A-18
  Section 3.19   Board Approval; Vote Required   A-20
  Section 3.20   Brokers   A-21

ARTICLE IV.    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER CO

 

A-21
 
Section 4.01

 

Corporate Organization

 

A-21
  Section 4.02   Charter Documents   A-21
  Section 4.03   Authority Relative to This Agreement   A-21
  Section 4.04   No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents   A-21
  Section 4.05   Absence of Litigation   A-22
  Section 4.06   Operations of Merger Co.   A-22
  Section 4.07   Financing   A-22
  Section 4.08   Brokers   A-22
  Section 4.09   Ownership of Company Common Stock   A-22
         

A-i



ARTICLE V.    CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

 

A-23
 
Section 5.01

 

Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Merger

 

A-23

ARTICLE VI.    ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

 

A-26
 
Section 6.01

 

Proxy Statement; Other Filings

 

A-26
  Section 6.02   Company Stockholders' Meeting   A-27
  Section 6.03   Access to Information; Confidentiality; Due Diligence   A-27
  Section 6.04   Acquisition Proposals   A-27
  Section 6.05   Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance   A-30
  Section 6.06   Employee Benefits Matters   A-31
  Section 6.07   Notification of Certain Matters   A-32
  Section 6.08   Financing   A-32
  Section 6.09   Further Action; Reasonable Best Efforts; Notice of Certain Events   A-33
  Section 6.10   Public Announcements   A-34
  Section 6.11   Resignations   A-35
  Section 6.12   Guarantee of Performance   A-35
  Section 6.13   Takeover Statutes   A-35
  Section 6.14   SemGroup Agreement Termination Fee   A-35

ARTICLE VII.    CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER

 

A-35
 
Section 7.01

 

Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party

 

A-35
  Section 7.02   Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and Merger Co.   A-36
  Section 7.03   Conditions to the Obligations of the Company   A-37

ARTICLE VIII.    TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

 

A-38
 
Section 8.01

 

Termination

 

A-38
  Section 8.02   Effect of Termination   A-39
  Section 8.03   Fees and Expenses   A-39
  Section 8.04   Amendment   A-40
  Section 8.05   Waiver   A-40

ARTICLE IX.    GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

A-40
 
Section 9.01

 

Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements

 

A-40
  Section 9.02   Notices   A-41
  Section 9.03   Certain Definitions   A-41
  Section 9.04   Severability   A-48
  Section 9.05   Entire Agreement; Assignment   A-48
  Section 9.06   Parties in Interest   A-48
  Section 9.07   Governing Law   A-49
  Section 9.08   Specific Performance; Submission to Jurisdiction   A-49
  Section 9.09   Waiver of Jury Trial   A-49
  Section 9.10   Headings   A-49
  Section 9.11   Counterparts   A-49

A-ii


AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER ("Agreement"), dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), Buffalo Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Co"), and TransMontaigne Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). Certain capitalized terms have the meanings given to such terms in Section 9.03.

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of each of the Company, Merger Co and Parent, each deem it in the best interests of their respective stockholders to consummate the merger (the "Merger"), on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, of Merger Co with and into the Company, and such Boards of Directors have approved this Agreement and declared its advisability (and, in the case of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Company Board"), recommended that this Agreement be adopted by the Company's stockholders).

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:


ARTICLE I.
THE MERGER

        Section 1.01    The Merger.     Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in Article VII, and in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), at the Effective Time, Merger Co shall be merged with and into the Company. At the Effective Time, the separate corporate existence of Merger Co shall cease and the Company shall continue as the surviving corporation of the Merger (the "Surviving Corporation").


        Section 1.02
    Closing.     Unless this Agreement shall have been terminated in accordance with Section 8.01, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VII, the closing of the Merger (the "Closing") will take place at 11:00 a.m., Colorado time, no later than the second business day following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VII (other than those that by their terms are to be satisfied or waived at the Closing), at the offices of Morrison & Foerster LLP, 5200 Republic Plaza, 370 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, unless another time, date and/or place is agreed to in writing by Parent and the Company (the date on which the Closing occurs, the "Closing Date").


        Section 1.03
    Effective Time.     Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, on the Closing Date, the parties hereto shall file a certificate of merger (the "Certificate of Merger") in such form as is required by, and executed and acknowledged in accordance with, the relevant provisions of the DGCL. The Merger shall become effective at such date and time as the Certificate of Merger is duly filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such subsequent date and time as Merger Co and the Company shall agree and specify in the Certificate of Merger. The date and time at which the Merger becomes effective is referred to in this Agreement as the "Effective Time."


        Section 1.04
    Effect of the Merger.     At the Effective Time, the effect of the Merger shall be as provided in Section 259 of the DGCL.


        Section 1.05
    Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws.     



        Section 1.06
    Directors and Officers.     The directors of Merger Co immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the initial directors of the Surviving Corporation, each to hold office in accordance with the Charter Documents of the Surviving Corporation, and the officers of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the initial officers of the Surviving Corporation, each to hold office in accordance with the Charter Documents of the Surviving Corporation, in each case until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified or until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal.


ARTICLE II.
CONVERSION OF SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES

        Section 2.01    Conversion of Securities.     At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of Parent, Merger Co, the Company or the holders of any of the following securities:

A-2



        Section 2.02
    Exchange of Certificates.     

A-3


A-4



        Section 2.03
    Stock Transfer Books.     At the Effective Time, the stock transfer books of the Company shall be closed and there shall be no further registration of transfers of Shares thereafter on the records of the Company. From and after the Effective Time, the holders of Certificates representing Shares outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall cease to have any rights with respect to such Shares, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or by Law. On or after the Effective Time, any Certificates presented to the Paying Agent or Merger Co for any reason shall be cancelled against delivery of the Merger Consideration to which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant to Section 2.01(a).


        Section 2.04
    Options, Warrants and Restricted Stock.     

A-5



        Section 2.05
    Dissenting Shares.     


ARTICLE III.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

        The Company represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Co that the statements contained in this Article III are true and correct, except as set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company's and TransMontaigne Partners' most recent Annual Report (or Transition Report in the case of TransMontaigne Partners) on Form 10-K, each subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Current Report on Form 8-K, as applicable, and the Company's most recent Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, in each case as filed with the SEC prior to the date of this Agreement. The Company Disclosure Schedule shall be arranged in sections and paragraphs corresponding to the numbered and lettered sections and paragraphs contained in this Article III, and the disclosure in any section or paragraph shall qualify (a) the corresponding section or paragraph in this Article III and (b) the other

A-6



sections and paragraphs in this Article III to the extent that it is reasonably apparent from a reading of such disclosure that it also qualifies or applies to such other sections and paragraphs:


        Section 3.01
    Organization and Qualification.     Each of the Company and each of its Subsidiaries is a corporation, limited company, limited partnership, limited liability company or other business entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Law of the jurisdiction of its organization and has the requisite corporate, limited company, partnership, limited liability company or other business entity (as the case may be) power and authority and all necessary governmental approvals to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted, except where the failure to be so organized, existing or in good standing or to have such power, authority and governmental approvals would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. A true and complete list of all the Subsidiaries, together with the jurisdiction of incorporation of such Subsidiary, is set forth in Section 3.01 of the Company Disclosure Schedule. The Company and each Subsidiary is duly qualified or licensed as a foreign corporation to do business and is in good standing (in each instance where such concepts are legally applicable) in each jurisdiction where the character of the properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of its business makes such qualification or licensing necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified or licensed and in good standing would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.


        Section 3.02
    Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.     The Company has made available to Parent a complete and correct copy of the Charter Documents (or similar organizational documents), each as amended to date, of the Company and each Subsidiary. Such Charter Documents are in full force and effect.


        Section 3.03
    Capitalization.     

A-7


A-8



        Section 3.04
    Authority Relative to This Agreement.     The Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement to be consummated by the Company (the "Other Transactions"). The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Company and the consummation by the Company of the Merger and the Other Transactions have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to

A-9


consummate the Merger or such Other Transactions (other than the Stockholder Approval and the filing of the Certificate of Merger). This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery by Parent and Merger Co, constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including all Law relating to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or similar Law affecting creditors' rights generally and subject to the effect of general principles of equity. The Company has provided Parent with a true and complete copy of the SemGroup Agreement, including all schedules and exhibits thereto. The Company has complied in all material respects with its obligations under the SemGroup Agreement, and the SemGroup Agreement has been terminated in accordance with the terms thereof.


        Section 3.05
    No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents.     

A-10



        Section 3.06
    Permits; Compliance.     

A-11



        Section 3.07
    SEC Filings; Financial Statements; Undisclosed Liabilities.     

A-12



        Section 3.08
    Affiliate Transactions.     Except as set forth in the SEC Reports or as contemplated by this Agreement, there are no transactions, agreements, arrangements or understandings between (i) the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and (ii) any Affiliate of the Company (other than any of its Subsidiaries), on the other hand, of the type that would be required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act.


        Section 3.09
    Absence of Certain Changes or Events.     From December 31, 2005 through the date of this Agreement, there has not occurred any Company Material Adverse Effect. Since December 31, 2005, and prior to the date of this Agreement, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement, (a) the Company and the Subsidiaries have conducted their businesses only in the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice and (b) except as set forth in Section 3.09 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has taken any action or agreed to take any action that would be prohibited by clauses (a) through (t) of Section 5.01 if taken after the date hereof.


        Section 3.10
    Absence of Litigation.     Except as set forth in Section 3.10 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, there is no litigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding, hearing, petition, grievance, complaint or investigation (an "Action") pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing against the Company or any Subsidiary, or any property or asset of the Company or any Subsidiary, before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary nor any property or asset of the Company or any Subsidiary is subject to any order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of, or, to the knowledge of the Company, any continuing investigation by, any Governmental Authority, except as would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.


        Section 3.11
    Employee Benefit Plans.     

A-13


A-14



        Section 3.12
    Labor and Employment Matters.     Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is, or at any time has been, a party to any collective bargaining agreement or other labor union agreements applicable to Persons employed by the Company or any Subsidiary. Except as disclosed in Section 3.12 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, there are no employees represented by a works council or a labor organization or, to the knowledge of the Company, activities or proceedings of any labor union to organize any such employees. No work stoppage, slowdown or labor strike against the Company or any Subsidiary is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing. Except as would not have a Company Material Adverse Effect, the Company and its Subsidiaries (a) have no direct or indirect liability with respect to any misclassification of any Persons as an independent contractor rather than as an employee and (b) are in compliance with all applicable Law respecting employment, employment practices, terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours, in each case, with respect to their employees. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, there are no charges, appeals or Actions against the Company or any Subsidiary pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing, before or by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the National Labor Relations Board or any other comparable Governmental Authority. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received notice during the past three years of the intent of any Governmental Authority responsible for the enforcement of labor, employment, occupational health and safety or workplace safety and insurance/workers' compensation laws to conduct an investigation of or affecting the Company or a Subsidiary and, to the knowledge of the Company, no such investigation is in progress. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, there are no outstanding assessments, penalties, fines, liens, charges, surcharges, or other amounts due or owing by the Company or Company Subsidiaries pursuant to any workplace safety and insurance/workers' compensation Laws; neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has been reassessed in any material respect under such Laws during the past three years; there are no claims that may affect the accident cost experience of the Company or any Subsidiary.


        Section 3.13
    Real Property.     

A-15



        Section 3.14
    Intellectual Property.     The Company or its Subsidiaries owns or has the right to use all Intellectual Property necessary to conduct the Company's business as presently conducted, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. The conduct of the Company's and its Subsidiaries' business or use of the Intellectual Property does not infringe, violate, misappropriate or misuse any intellectual property rights or any other proprietary right of any Person or give rise to any obligations to any Person as a result of co-authorship, except in each case for exceptions that would not, individually or in the aggregate, be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.


        Section 3.15
    Taxes.     

A-16



        Section 3.16
    Environmental Matters.     

A-17



        Section 3.17
    Insurance.     The Company has in full force and effect the insurance coverage with respect to its business and the businesses of its Subsidiaries set forth in Section 3.17 of the Company Disclosure Schedule. There is no claim pending (i) under any Directors and Officers liability insurance, or (ii) in excess of $1,000,000 under any other insurance as to which coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed by the underwriters of such policies or bonds. All premiums due and payable under all such policies have been paid and the Company and its Subsidiaries are otherwise in compliance in all material respects with the terms of such policies. Except for (x) any broad-based increases in insurance premiums that affect industries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries conduct their business, so long as such changes, fluctuations or conditions do not adversely affect the Company or its Subsidiaries in a materially disproportionate manner relative to other similarly situated participants in the industries or markets in which they operate, and (y) as set forth in Section 3.17 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company has no knowledge of any threatened termination of, or material premium increase with respect to, any of such policies.


        Section 3.18
    Specified Contracts.     

A-18


A-19



        Section 3.19
    Board Approval; Vote Required.     

A-20



        Section 3.20
    Brokers.     No broker, finder or investment banker other than UBS Securities LLC is entitled to any brokerage, finder's or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company. The Company has delivered to Parent complete and accurate copies of all agreements under which any fees or expenses are or may be payable to UBS Securities LLC.


ARTICLE IV.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER CO

        Each of Parent and Merger Co, jointly and severally, hereby represents and warrants to the Company that, except as set forth in the Parent Disclosure Schedule:


        Section 4.01
    Corporate Organization.     Each of Parent and Merger Co is a corporation, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Law of the State of Delaware; and each has the requisite corporate power and authority and all necessary governmental approvals to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted, except where the failure to be so organized, existing or in good standing or to have such power, authority and governmental approvals would not, individually or in the aggregate, prevent or delay consummation of the Merger beyond the Expiration Date or otherwise prevent or materially delay either Parent or Merger Co from performing its obligations under this Agreement.


        Section 4.02
    Charter Documents.     Each of Parent and Merger Co has heretofore furnished to the Company a complete and correct copy of its Charter Documents as amended to date. Such Charter Documents are in full force and effect.


        Section 4.03
    Authority Relative to This Agreement.     Each of Parent and Merger Co has all necessary corporate or other power and authority, as applicable, to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the Merger. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by each of Parent and Merger Co and the consummation by each of Parent and Merger Co of the Merger have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate or other action, and no other corporate or other proceedings on the part of Parent or Merger Co are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the Merger. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by each of Parent and Merger Co and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the Company, constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each of Parent and Merger Co, enforceable against each of Parent and Merger Co in accordance with its terms, subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including all Law relating to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or similar Law affecting creditors' rights generally and subject to the effect of general principles of equity.


        Section 4.04
    No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents.     

A-21



        Section 4.05
    Absence of Litigation.     As of the date of this Agreement, there is no Action pending or, to the knowledge of Parent and Merger Co, threatened, in writing against either Parent or Merger Co or any of their Affiliates before any Governmental Authority that would or seeks to materially delay or prevent the consummation of the Merger. As of the date of this Agreement, neither Parent nor Merger Co nor any of their Affiliates, including their officers and directors, is subject to any continuing order of, consent decree, settlement agreement or other similar written agreement with or continuing investigation by, any Governmental Authority, or any order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of any Governmental Authority that, in each case would or seeks to delay or prevent beyond the Expiration Date the consummation of the Merger.


        Section 4.06
    Operations of Merger Co.     Merger Co was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated hereby, has engaged in no other business activities and has conducted its operations only as contemplated by this Agreement.


        Section 4.07
    Financing.     Parent has and will have at the Effective Time sufficient funds (including pursuant to any existing or committed credit facilities) to enable it to pay the aggregate Merger Consideration and all related fees and expenses (such funds, the "Financing"). The Financing will not cause (i) the fair salable value of the assets of the Surviving Corporation to be less than the total amount of its existing liabilities; (ii) the fair salable value of the assets of the Surviving Corporation to be less than the amount that will be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts as they mature; (iii) the Surviving Corporation not to be able to pay its existing debts as they mature; or (iv) the Surviving Corporation to have an unreasonably small capital with which to engage in its business.


        Section 4.08
    Brokers.     Except to the extent payable after, and conditioned on, Closing, the Company will not be responsible for any brokerage, finder's or other similar fee or commission to any broker, finder or investment banker in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of either Parent or Merger Co.


        Section 4.09
    Ownership of Company Common Stock.     Except as disclosed in Morgan Stanley's statement on Schedule 13D, as amended, filed with the SEC on or prior to the date hereof, neither Parent nor any of Parent's "Affiliates" or "Associates" directly or indirectly "owns," and at all times

A-22


during the two-year period prior to the date of this Agreement, neither Parent nor any of Parent's Affiliates directly or indirectly has "owned," beneficially or otherwise, 10% or more of the outstanding Company Common Stock, as those terms are defined in Section 203 of the DGCL.


ARTICLE V.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

        Section 5.01    Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Merger.     The Company agrees that, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement or as set forth in Section 5.01 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the businesses of the Company and the Subsidiaries shall be conducted only in, and the Company and the Subsidiaries shall not take any action except in, the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice, and the Company shall, and shall cause each of the Subsidiaries to, use its reasonable best efforts consistent with past practice to preserve substantially intact the business organization of the Company and the Subsidiaries, to preserve the assets and properties of the Company and the Subsidiaries in good repair and condition, to keep available the services of its present officers and employees and to preserve the current relationships of the Company and the Subsidiaries with customers, suppliers and other Persons with which the Company or any Subsidiary has material business relations, in each case in the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as contemplated by any other provision of this Agreement or as set forth in Section 5.01 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company agrees that neither the Company nor any Subsidiary shall, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, directly or indirectly, do any of the following without the prior written consent of Parent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned:

A-23


A-24


A-25



ARTICLE VI.
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

        Section 6.01    Proxy Statement; Other Filings.     As promptly as practicable following the date of this Agreement, (a) the Company shall prepare and file with the SEC the preliminary Proxy Statement, and (b) each of the Company, Parent and Merger Co shall, or shall cause their respective Affiliates to, prepare and file with the SEC all other documents that are required to be filed by such party in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby (the "Other Filings"). Each of the Company, Parent and Merger Co shall furnish all information concerning itself and its Affiliates that is required to be included in the Proxy Statement or, to the extent applicable, the Other Filings, or that is customarily included in proxy statements or other filings prepared in connection with transactions of the type contemplated by this Agreement. Each party shall promptly notify the other parties upon the receipt of any comments from the SEC or its staff or any request from the SEC or its staff for amendments or supplements to the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings and shall provide the other parties with copies of all correspondence between it and its representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC and its staff, on the other hand, relating to the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings. Each of the Company, Parent and Merger Co shall use its reasonable best efforts to respond as promptly as practicable to any comments of the SEC with respect to the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings, and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the definitive Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Company's stockholders as promptly as reasonably practicable after the date of this Agreement. If at any time prior to the Effective Time, any information relating to the Company, Parent, Merger Co or any of their respective Affiliates, officers or directors, should be discovered by the Company, Parent or Merger Co which should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings, so that the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings shall not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, the party that discovers such information shall promptly notify the other parties, and an appropriate amendment or supplement describing such information shall be filed by the Company with the SEC and, to the extent required by applicable Law, disseminated to the stockholders of the Company. The Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Company stockholders as soon as reasonably practicable. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary stated above, prior to filing or mailing the Proxy Statement or filing the Other Filings (or, in each case, any amendment or supplement thereto) or responding to any comments of the SEC with respect thereto, the Company shall provide the other parties an opportunity to review and comment on such document or response and shall include in such document or response comments reasonably proposed by the other party. The Proxy Statement and the Other Filings that are filed by the Company will comply as to form in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        The Company hereby covenants and agrees that none of the information included or incorporated by reference in the Proxy Statement or in the Other Filings to be made by the Company will, in the case of the Proxy Statement, at the date it is first mailed to the Company's stockholders or at the time of the Company Stockholders' Meeting or at the time of any amendment or supplement thereof, or, in the case of any Other Filing, at the date it is first mailed to the Company's stockholders or at the date it is first filed with the SEC, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, except that no covenant is made by the Company with respect to statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied by Parent or Merger Co or any Affiliate of Parent or Merger Co in connection with the preparation of the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings for inclusion or incorporation by reference therein. Parent and Merger Co hereby covenant and agree that none of the information supplied by Parent or Merger Co or any Affiliate of Parent or Merger Co for inclusion or

A-26


incorporation by reference in the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings will, in the case of the Proxy Statement, at the date it is first mailed to the Company's stockholders or at the time of the Company Stockholders' Meeting or at the time of any amendment or supplement thereof, or, in the case of any Other Filing, at the date it is first mailed to the Company's stockholders or, at the date it is first filed with the SEC, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading. No covenant is made by either Parent or Merger Co with respect to statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied by the Company in connection with the preparation of the Proxy Statement or the Other Filings for inclusion or incorporation by reference therein. All Other Filings that are filed by Parent or Merger Co will comply as to form in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.


        Section 6.02
    Company Stockholders' Meeting.     Subject to Sections 6.01 and 6.04, the Company shall duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its stockholders (the "Company Stockholders' Meeting"), as promptly as practicable after the date of this Agreement, for the purpose of voting upon the adoption of this Agreement. Subject to Section 6.04, (i) the Company Board will recommend to holders of the Shares that they adopt this Agreement and the Company shall include such recommendation in the Proxy Statement and (ii) the Company will use reasonable best efforts to solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and will take all other action necessary or advisable to secure the Stockholder Approval.


        Section 6.03
    Access to Information; Confidentiality; Due Diligence.     


        Section 6.04
    Acquisition Proposals.     

A-27


A-28


A-29



        Section 6.05
    Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance.     

A-30



        Section 6.06
    Employee Benefits Matters.     

A-31



        Section 6.07
    Notification of Certain Matters.     Subject to applicable Law and the instructions of any Governmental Authority, each of the Company and Parent shall keep the other apprised of the status of matters relating to completion of the transactions contemplated hereby, including promptly furnishing the other with copies of notices or other communications received by Parent or the Company, as the case may be, or any of its Subsidiaries, from any third Person and/or any Governmental Authority with respect to the Merger and the Other Transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Between the date hereof and the Effective Time, (i) the Company shall promptly notify Parent in writing of any breach of any representation, warranty or covenant of the Company contained herein or the failure of any representation or warranty of the Company contained herein to remain accurate (other than any such representation or warranty that expressly spoke only as of the date of this Agreement or as a result of any transaction permitted by Section 5.01 or in accordance with Article VI of this Agreement), (ii) Parent will promptly notify the Company in writing of any breach of any representation, warranty or covenant of Parent or Merger Co contained herein or the failure of any representation or warranty of Parent or Merger Co contained herein to remain accurate (other than any such representation or warranty that expressly spoke only as of the date of this Agreement or as a result of any transaction in accordance with Article VI of this Agreement), and (iii) the Company will notify Parent in writing and Parent will notify the Company in writing of any communication received (A) from any Person alleging a consent of such Person is or may be required in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or (B) from any Governmental Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.


        Section 6.08
    Financing.     The Company agrees to provide, and shall cause the Subsidiaries and its and their Representatives to provide, such cooperation (including with respect to timeliness) in connection with the arrangement of the Financing as may be reasonably requested by Parent (provided that such requested cooperation does not unreasonably interfere with the ongoing operations of the Company and the Subsidiaries), including (i) participation in meetings, drafting sessions and due diligence sessions, (ii) furnishing Parent and its financing sources with financial and other pertinent information regarding the Company and its Subsidiaries, and the General Partner, TransMontaigne Partners, and the MLP Subsidiaries, as may be reasonably requested by Parent, including all financial statements and financial data of the type required by Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and of type and form customarily included in private placements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act to consummate the offering of secured or unsecured senior or senior subordinated notes, (iii) assisting Parent and its financing sources in the preparation of (A) offering documents for any of the Financing and (B) materials for rating agency presentations, (iv) cooperating with the marketing efforts of Parent and its financing sources for any of the Financing, (v) providing and executing documents as may be reasonably requested by Parent, including a certificate of the chief financial officer of the Company with respect to solvency matters, consents of accountants for use of their reports in any materials relating to the Financing and revocable notices of redemption of debt, (vi) facilitating the pledging of collateral, and (vii) using reasonable best efforts to obtain legal opinions, accountants' comfort letters, surveys and title insurance as reasonably requested by Parent. Parent shall, promptly upon request by the Company, reimburse the Company for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Company or the Subsidiaries in connection with such cooperation.

A-32



        Section 6.09
    Further Action; Reasonable Best Efforts; Notice of Certain Events.     

A-33



        Section 6.10
    Public Announcements.     The initial press release relating to this Agreement shall be a press release issued jointly by the parties, or separate press releases issued by each party, in either case the text of which has been agreed to by each of Parent and the Company. Thereafter, each of

A-34


Parent and the Company shall consult with each other before issuing any press release or otherwise making any public statements with respect to this Agreement or the Merger, except to the extent public disclosure is required by applicable Law or the requirements of the NYSE, in which case the issuing party shall use its reasonable best efforts to consult with the other party before issuing any such release or making any such public statement.


        Section 6.11
    Resignations.     The Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain and deliver to Parent at the Closing evidence reasonably satisfactory to Parent of the resignation, effective as of the Effective Time, of those directors of the Company or any Subsidiary designated by Parent to the Company in writing at least ten business days prior to the Closing.


        Section 6.12
    Guarantee of Performance.     Parent hereby unconditionally guarantees the full and timely performance by Parent and Merger Co of each of their obligations under this Agreement.


        Section 6.13
    Takeover Statutes.     If any of the limitations on business combinations contained in any restrictive provision of any "fair price," "moratorium," "control share acquisition," "interested stockholder" or other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation (including, without limitation, Section 203 of the Delaware Law to the extent applicable) ("Takeover Statute") is or may become applicable to the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the parties hereto, the Company and the Company Board shall grant all approvals and take all actions as are necessary so that such transactions may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and otherwise act to eliminate the effects of such Takeover Statute on such transactions.


        Section 6.14
    SemGroup Agreement Termination Fee.     


ARTICLE VII.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER

        Section 7.01    Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.     The obligations of the Company, Parent and Merger Co to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing (where permissible) as of the Closing of the following conditions:

A-35



        Section 7.02
    Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and Merger Co.     The obligations of Parent and Merger Co to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing (where permissible) as of the Closing of the following additional conditions:

A-36



        Section 7.03
    Conditions to the Obligations of the Company.     The obligations of the Company to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing (where permissible) as of the Closing of the following additional conditions:

A-37



ARTICLE VIII.
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

        Section 8.01    Termination.     This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by action taken or authorized by the Board of Directors of the terminating party or parties, notwithstanding any requisite adoption of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company, and whether before or after the stockholders of the Company have approved this Agreement at the Company Stockholders' Meeting, as follows (the date of any termination of this Agreement, the "Termination Date"):

A-38



        Section 8.02
    Effect of Termination.     In the event of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01, this Agreement shall forthwith become void, and there shall be no liability under this Agreement on the part of any party hereto (except that the provisions of Section 6.03(b), Section 6.14, this Section 8.02, Section 8.03 and Article IX shall survive any such termination); provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve any party from liability for any willful and material breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement prior to such termination.


        Section 8.03
    Fees and Expenses.     Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, all Expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated. "Expenses," as used in this Agreement, shall include all reasonable out-of-pocket documented expenses (including all fees and expenses of counsel, accountants, investment bankers, financing sources, hedging counterparties, experts and consultants to a party hereto and its Affiliates) incurred by a party or on its behalf (or, with respect to Parent and Merger Co, incurred by their stockholders or on their behalf) in connection with or related to the transactions contemplated hereby, including the authorization, preparation, negotiation, execution and performance of this Agreement, the Commitment Letters and the other transactions contemplated hereby or thereby (including the Financing), the preparation, printing, filing and mailing of the Proxy Statement, the solicitation of stockholder approval, Financing and all other matters related to the closing of the Merger.

A-39



        Section 8.04
    Amendment.     This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto by action taken by or on behalf of their respective Boards of Directors at any time prior to the Effective Time; provided, however, that, after the adoption of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company, no amendment shall be made except as allowed under applicable Law. This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed by each of the parties hereto.


        Section 8.05
    Waiver.     Any party hereto may (a) extend the time for the performance of any obligation or other act of any other party hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracy in the representations and warranties of any other party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and (c) waive compliance with any agreement of any other party or any condition to its own obligations contained herein. Any such extension or waiver shall be valid if set forth in an instrument in writing signed by the party or parties to be bound thereby. The failure of any party to assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of those rights.


ARTICLE IX.
GENERAL PROVISIONS

        Section 9.01    Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements.     The representations and warranties in this Agreement and in any certificate delivered pursuant hereto shall terminate at the Effective Time. This Section 9.01 shall not limit any covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms contemplates performance after the Effective Time.

A-40



        Section 9.02
    Notices.     All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered personally, (b) on the first business day following the date of dispatch if delivered by a nationally recognized next-day courier service, (c) on the fifth business day following the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) or (d) if sent by facsimile transmission, when transmitted and receipt is confirmed. All notices under Section 6.04 or Article VIII shall be delivered by courier and facsimile transmission to the respective parties at the addresses provided in accordance with this Section 9.02. All notices hereunder shall be delivered to the respective parties at the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified in a notice given in accordance with this Section 9.02):


        Section 9.03
    Certain Definitions.     

A-41


A-42


A-43


A-44


Defined Term

  Location of Definition
Acquisition Proposal   § 6.04
Action   § 3.10
Affiliate   § 9.03
Agreement   Preamble
Authorized Acquisition   § 9.03
beneficial owner   § 9.03
business day   § 9.03
Capitalization Date   § 3.03
Certificate of Merger   § 1.03
Certificates   § 2.02
Change in Board Recommendation   § 6.04
     

A-45


Charter Documents   § 9.03
Closing   § 1.02
Closing Date   § 1.02
Code   § 3.11
Common Certificates   § 2.02
Common Merger Consideration   § 2.01
Common Shares   § 2.01
Common Units   § 9.03
Company   Preamble
Company Board   Recitals
Company Common Stock   § 2.01
Company Credit Facility   § 9.03
Company Disclosure Schedule   § 9.03
Company Equity Plans   § 2.04
Company Material Adverse Effect   § 9.03
Company Permits   § 3.06
Company Preferred Stock   § 2.01
Company Stock Options   § 2.04
Company Stockholders' Meeting   § 6.02
Company's knowledge   § 9.03
Confidentiality Agreement   § 6.03
Contract   § 3.05
control   § 9.03
controlled by   § 9.03
Debt Tender   § 6.09
DGCL   § 1.01
Dissenting Shares   § 2.05
Effective Time   § 1.03
Employee   § 6.06
Environmental Laws   § 9.03
Environmental Permits   § 9.03
ERISA   § 3.11
ERISA Affiliate   § 3.11
Exchange Act   § 3.05
Exchange Fund   § 2.02
Expenses   § 8.03
Expiration Date   § 9.03
Financing   § 4.07
GAAP   § 3.07
General Partner   § 9.03
General Partner Interest   § 9.03
Government Antitrust Authority   § 6.09
Governmental Authority   § 3.05
HSR Act   § 3.05
Incentive Distribution Rights   § 9.03
Indebtedness   § 9.03
Indemnified Parties   § 6.05
indemnitees   § 6.09
Intellectual Property   § 9.03
Investments   § 3.03
     

A-46


IRS   § 3.11
knowledge of the Company   § 9.03
Law   § 3.05
Liens   § 9.03
Material Adverse Tax Effect   § 3.15
Materials of Environmental Concern   § 9.03
Merger   Recitals
Merger Co   Preamble
Merger Consideration   § 9.03
MLP Equity Plan   § 9.03
MLP Subsidiary   § 9.03
Morgan Stanley Agreements   § 9.03
Notes   § 7.01
NYSE   § 3.05
Omnibus Agreement   § 9.03
Other Filings   § 6.01
Other Transactions   § 3.04
Owned Properties   § 3.13
Parent   Preamble
Partnership Interests   § 9.03
Paying Agent   § 2.02
Permitted Liens   § 3.13
Person   § 9.03
Plans   § 3.11
Preferred Certificates   § 2.02
Preferred Merger Consideration   § 9.03
Preferred Shares   § 2.01
Preferred Transmittal Letter   § 9.03
Properties   § 3.13
Proxy Statement   § 3.05
Purchaser Welfare Benefit Plans   § 6.06
Reimbursement   § 6.14
Representatives   § 6.03
Restricted Stock Awards   § 2.04
Sarbanes-Oxley Act   § 3.06
SEC   § 3.05
SEC Reports   § 3.07
Second Request   § 6.09
Section 203   § 3.19
Section 262   § 2.02
Securities Act   § 3.07
SemGroup Agreement   § 9.03
Shares   § 2.01
Specified Contract   § 3.18
Standstill Agreement   § 9.03
Stockholder Approval   § 3.19
Subordinated Units   § 9.03
subsidiaries   § 9.03
subsidiary   § 9.03
Subsidiary   § 9.03
     

A-47


Superior Proposal   § 6.04
Surviving Corporation   § 1.01
Takeover Statute   § 6.13
Tax or Taxes   § 9.03
Tax Returns   § 9.03
Termination Date   § 8.01
Termination Fee   § 8.03
TransMontaigne Partners   § 9.03
TransMontaigne Partners Credit Facility   § 9.03
TransMontaigne Partners Material Adverse Effect   § 9.03
TransMontaigne Partners Partnership Agreement   § 9.03
under common control with   § 9.03
Warrant   § 2.04


        Section 9.04
    Severability.     If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of Law, or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in a mutually acceptable manner in order that the transactions contemplated hereby be consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent possible.


        Section 9.05
    Entire Agreement; Assignment.     This Agreement and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior agreements and undertakings, both written and oral, among the parties hereto, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof. This Agreement shall not be assigned (whether pursuant to a merger, by operation of Law or otherwise), except that Parent or Merger Co may assign all or any of their rights and obligations hereunder to an Affiliate, to a lender or financial institution as collateral for indebtedness or, after the Closing, in connection with a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Parent or the Surviving Corporation and its Subsidiaries provided, however, that no such assignment shall relieve the assigning party of its obligations hereunder if such assignee does not perform such obligations.


        Section 9.06
    Parties in Interest.     This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure solely to the benefit of each party hereto, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer upon any other Person any right, benefit or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement, other than Section 6.05 (which is intended to be for the benefit of the Persons covered thereby and may be enforced by such Persons).

A-48



        Section 9.07
    Governing Law.     This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the Law of the State of Delaware (without giving effect to the choice of law principles therein).


        Section 9.08
    Specific Performance; Submission to Jurisdiction.     The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement in the Court of Chancery or other courts of the State of Delaware, this being in addition to any other remedy to which such party is entitled at law or in equity. In addition, each of the parties hereto (i) consents to submit itself to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery or other courts of the State of Delaware in the event any dispute arises out of this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) agrees that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from such court, (iii) agrees that it will not bring any action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than the Court of Chancery or other courts of the State of Delaware and (iv) to the fullest extent permitted by Law, consents to service being made through the notice procedures set forth in Section 9.02. Each party hereto hereby agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by Law, service of any process, summons, notice or document by U.S. registered mail to the respective addresses set forth in Section 9.02 shall be effective service of process for any suit or proceeding in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby.


        Section 9.09
    Waiver of Jury Trial.     Each of the parties hereto hereby waives to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law any right it may have to a trial by jury with respect to any litigation directly or indirectly arising out of, under or in connection with this Agreement or the Merger. Each of the parties hereto (a) certifies that no representative, agent or attorney of any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of litigation, seek to enforce that foregoing waiver and (b) acknowledges that it and the other parties hereto have been induced to enter into this Agreement and the Merger, as applicable, by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 9.09.


        Section 9.10
    Headings.     The descriptive headings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience of reference only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.


        Section 9.11
    Counterparts.     This Agreement may be executed and delivered (including by facsimile or other electronic transmission) in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

        If the Company has failed to validly execute and deliver to Parent its executed counterpart to this Agreement by 7:00 am Denver time on Friday, June 23, 2006, this Agreement and the execution of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Co shall be void ab initio and shall be deemed to have never taken effect.

A-49



        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Co and the Company have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

    MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP INC.

 

 

By

 

/s/  
JOHN SHAPIRO      
Name:  John Shapiro
Title:    Chairman and President

 

 

BUFFALO MERGER SUB INC.

 

 

By

 

/s/  
JAVED AHMED      
Name:  Javed Ahmed
Title:    President

 

 

TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

 

 

By

 

/s/  
RANDALL J. LARSON      
Name:  Randall J. Larson
Title:    Executive Vice President

A-50



APPENDIX B

LOGO   UBS Securities LLC
1000 Main Street, Suite 2750
Houston, TX 77002

 

 

www.ubs.com

June 21, 2006

The Board of Directors
TransMontaigne Inc.
1670 Broadway, Suite 3100
Denver, CO 80202

Dear Members of the Board:

        We understand that TransMontaigne Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is considering a transaction (the "Transaction") whereby the Company will merge with Buffalo Merger Sub Inc. ("MergerCo"), a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"). Pursuant to the terms of a draft of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 21, 2006 (the "Agreement"), the Company will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent and each of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company, par value of $0.01 per share (the "Company Common Stock"), will be converted into the right to receive $11.35 in cash, without interest (the "Consideration"). The terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully set forth in the Agreement.

        You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the Company Common Stock of the Consideration to be received by such holders in the Transaction.

        UBS Securities LLC ("UBS") has acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with the Transaction and has received and will receive fees for its services, including a portion of which is payable in connection with this opinion. In the past, UBS and its affiliates have provided investment banking services to the Company unrelated to the proposed Transaction, for which UBS and its affiliates have received compensation. In the ordinary course of business, UBS, its successors and affiliates may hold or trade, for their own accounts and the accounts of their customers, securities of the Company and its affiliates and of affiliates of Parent and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        Our opinion does not address the relative merits of the Transaction as compared to other business strategies or transactions that might be available with respect to the Company or the Company's underlying business decision to effect the Transaction. Our opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder should vote or act with respect to the Transaction. At your direction, we have not been asked to, nor do we, offer any opinion as to the terms (other than the Consideration) of the Agreement or the form of the Transaction. In rendering this opinion, we have assumed, with your consent, that (i) the final executed form of the Agreement does not differ in any material respect from the draft that we have examined; (ii) Parent, MergerCo and the Company will comply with all the material terms of the Agreement; and (iii) the Transaction will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement without any adverse waiver or amendment of any material term or condition thereof. We have also assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the

UBS Investment Bank is a business group of UBS AG.
UBS Securities LLC is a subsidiary of UBS AG.

B-1


LOGO

Transaction will be obtained without any material adverse effect on Parent, MergerCo, the Company or the Transaction. We have also assumed that the Company will make a payment of $15 million to SemGroup Subsidiary Holding, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ("SemGroup"), as set forth in the amended and restated agreement and plan of merger among the Company, SemGroup and the other parties named therein, dated as of May 22, 2006. In 2004, we assisted the Company in contacting parties regarding a potential business combination with the Company; however, in connection with the Transaction, we have not been authorized to solicit, and have not solicited, indications of interest in a business combination with the Company from any party.

        In arriving at our opinion, we have, among other things: (i) reviewed certain publicly available business and historical financial information relating to the Company; (ii) reviewed certain internal financial information and other data relating to the business and financial prospects of the Company that were provided to us by the Company and not publicly available, including financial forecasts and estimates prepared by the management of the Company; (iii) conducted discussions with members of the senior management of the Company concerning the business and financial prospects of the Company; (iv) reviewed publicly available financial and stock market data with respect to certain other companies we believe to be generally relevant; (v) compared the financial terms of the Transaction with the publicly available financial terms of certain other transactions we believe to be generally relevant; (vi) reviewed current and historical market prices of the Company Common Stock; (vii) reviewed the Agreement; and (viii) conducted such other financial studies, analyses and investigations, and considered such other information, as we deemed necessary or appropriate.

        In connection with our review, with your consent, we have not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any of the information reviewed by us for the purpose of this opinion and have, with your consent, relied on such information being complete and accurate in all material respects. In addition, with your consent, we have not made any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or Parent, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. With respect to the financial forecasts and estimates referred to above, we have assumed, at your direction, that they have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company as to the future performance of the Company. Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof.

        Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by holders of the Company Common Stock in the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

        This opinion is provided for the benefit of the Board of Directors in connection with, and for the purpose of, its consideration of the Transaction.

    Very truly yours,    

 

 

UBS SECURITIES LLC

 

 

By:

/s/  
MICHAEL JAMIESON      
Michael Jamieson
Managing Director

 

By:

/s/  
DANIEL WARD      
Daniel Ward
Managing Director

UBS Investment Bank is a business group of UBS AG.
UBS Securities LLC is a subsidiary of UBS AG.

B-2



APPENDIX C

GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

§ 262. APPRAISAL RIGHTS.

        (a)   Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

        (b)   Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to §251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to § 251(g) of this title), § 252, § 254, § 257, § 258, § 263 or § 264 of this title:

C-1


        (c)   Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

        (d)   Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

C-2


        (e)   Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.

        (f)    Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

        (g)   At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

        (h)   After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the

C-3



Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

        (i)    The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

        (j)    The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

        (k)   From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.

        (l)    The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.

C-4



PROXY


TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The undersigned stockholder of TRANSMONTAIGNE INC., a Delaware corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated July 25, 2006, and hereby appoints Donald H. Anderson and Erik B. Carlson, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of TRANSMONTAIGNE INC. to be held on August 31, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., Mountain Time, at the Central City Room of The Brown Palace Hotel, 321 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth on the reverse side.

This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed by the stockholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote "FOR" the Proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger.

In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

(Continued and to be voted on the reverse side)


Telephone and Internet Voting Instructions

You can vote by telephone or via the Internet. Available 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

To Vote using the Telephone (within the U.S. and Canada)

1.
Call toll free 1-866-731-VOTE (8683) in the United States or Canada at any time on a touch-tone telephone. There is No CHARGE to you for the call.

2.
Enter you Voter Control Number listed below and follow the simple instructions provided by the recorded message.

To Vote using the Internet


If you vote your Proxy by telephone or via the Internet,
please DO NOT mail back this proxy card.

Proxies submitted by telephone or via the Internet must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on August 31, 2006.

THANK YOU FOR VOTING

o
Please mark your
vote as in
this example

TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.


PLEASE REFER TO REVERSE SIDE FOR TELEPHONE AND INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR the following Proposal.

1.   PROPOSAL TO adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among TransMontaigne Inc., Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and Buffalo Merger Sub Inc.   o    FOR   o    AGAINST   o    ABSTAIN
o
Mark this Box with an X for any name or address change
Indicate changes below:

Authorized Signatures—Sign Here—You MUST Sign and Date this proxy for your instructions to be executed.

Note: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please provide your FULL title.

Signature:   Date      
     
   
           
Signature:   Date