Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ANNEX A TABLE OF CONTENTS
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-123019
|
|
MERGER PROPOSED—YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Cimarex Energy Co., referred to as Cimarex, its wholly owned subsidiary, Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., referred to as Merger Sub, and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., referred to as Magnum Hunter, have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 25, 2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of February 18, 2005 and Amendment No. 2 dated as of April 20, 2005, referred to as the merger agreement. Under the merger agreement, Cimarex will acquire Magnum Hunter through a merger of Merger Sub with and into Magnum Hunter, referred to as the merger. Following the merger, Magnum Hunter will be the surviving corporation and will continue as a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex. The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus describes the merger agreement, the merger and the transactions related to the merger in detail and provides information concerning the annual meeting of Cimarex stockholders and the special meeting of Magnum Hunter stockholders. Before we can complete the merger, we must obtain the approval of our common stockholders. We are sending you this joint proxy statement/prospectus to ask holders of Cimarex common stock to vote in favor of the approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger and holders of Magnum Hunter common stock to vote in favor of the approval of the merger agreement.
At the effective time of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of Magnum Hunter common stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock, and all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 20 shares of Cimarex common stock, each as described under "The Merger—Merger Consideration" in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The board of directors of Cimarex, by unanimous vote of the directors present:
- •
- has
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of, Cimarex and its
stockholders;
- •
- has
approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby; and
- •
- recommends that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger.
The issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting.
Cimarex is proposing to amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock and the maximum number of board seats. Approval of each of these proposals requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock as of the record date for the meeting. Also, Cimarex is proposing to amend its Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting. Finally, Cimarex is proposing to elect three directors to serve until the 2008 annual meeting and to ratify its audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005. The merger is not conditioned on approval of any of these additional proposals.
The board of directors of Magnum Hunter unanimously:
- •
- has
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of, Magnum Hunter and its
stockholders;
- •
- has
approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby; and
- •
- recommends that the stockholders of Magnum Hunter vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
The approval of the merger agreement and the merger by Magnum Hunter stockholders requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting.
Cimarex stockholders will vote at the Cimarex annual meeting in the Central City Room at the Brown Palace Hotel, 321 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, at 10:30 a.m. local time on June 6, 2005. Magnum Hunter stockholders will vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting at the Four Seasons Resort and Club, 4150 North MacArthur Blvd., Irving, Texas 75038 at 10:00 a.m. local time on June 6, 2005.
Cimarex common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "XEC." Magnum Hunter common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "MHR."
Before casting your vote, please take the time to review carefully this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page I-29.
Your vote is very important regardless of the number of shares you hold. We enthusiastically support this combination of our companies and join with our boards of directors in recommending that you vote "FOR" the approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger, in the case of Cimarex stockholders, and "FOR" the approval of the merger agreement and the merger, in the case of Magnum Hunter stockholders.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
| F.H. Merelli Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Cimarex Energy Co. |
Richard R. Frazier President and Chief Executive Officer of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities offered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus or passed on the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated April 29, 2005, and is first being mailed to Cimarex stockholders on or about May 6, 2005 and to Magnum Hunter stockholders on or about May 6, 2005.
Cimarex Energy Co.
1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800
Denver, Colorado 80203-4518
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2005
To the Stockholders of Cimarex Energy Co.:
The annual meeting of stockholders of Cimarex Energy Co., referred to as Cimarex, will be held on June 6, 2005, at 10:30 a.m., Mountain Time, in the Central City Room at the Brown Palace Hotel, 321 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, for the following purposes:
- 1.
- To
consider and vote on a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger of Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., referred to as Merger Sub,
a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex, with and into Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, referred to as Magnum Hunter.
- 2.
- To
consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
100 million shares to 200 million shares.
- 3.
- To
consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the maximum size of the board of directors from nine to ten
directors.
- 4.
- To
consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Cimarex's Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan from
seven million shares to 12.7 million shares and make certain other changes.
- 5.
- To
consider and vote upon a proposal to elect three directors to serve until the 2008 annual meeting.
- 6.
- To
consider and vote upon a proposal to ratify the audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005.
- 7.
- To transact any other business that may be properly brought before the annual meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice.
- (i)
- has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests
of, Cimarex and its stockholders;
- (ii)
- has approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby;
- (iii)
- recommends that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger;
The board of directors of Cimarex, by unanimous vote of the directors present:
- (iv)
- recommends that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of each of the proposed amendments to the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and "FOR"
approval of the proposed amendment to the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan;
- (v)
- recommends that stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" each of the named nominees for director; and
- (vi)
- recommends that stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" the ratification of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 29, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. All stockholders are invited to attend the annual meeting in person. To ensure your representation at the annual meeting, you are urged to vote in one of the following ways:
- (1)
- by
completing, signing and dating the accompanying proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope,
- (2)
- by
completing your proxy using the toll free number listed on the proxy card, or
- (3)
- by completing your proxy on the Internet at the address listed on your proxy card.
You may revoke your proxy in the manner described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus at any time before it has been voted. Any stockholder attending the annual meeting may vote in person even if he, she or it has returned a proxy.
IMPORTANT: WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, WE ASK YOU TO COMPLETE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED OR TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR ON THE INTERNET USING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PROXY CARD.
| By order of the Board of Directors, | ||
|
||
Mary K. Rohrer Assistant Corporate Secretary |
||
Date: April 29, 2005 |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
600 East Las Colinas Boulevard
Suite 1100
Irving, Texas 75039
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2005
Dear Stockholder:
A special meeting of stockholders of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., referred to as Magnum Hunter, on June 6, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, at the Four Seasons Resort and Club, 4150 North MacArthur Blvd., Irving, Texas 75038, for the following purposes:
- 1.
- To
consider and vote on a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated as of
February 18, 2005 and Amendment No. 2, dated as of April 20, 2005, by and among Magnum Hunter, Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation, referred to as Cimarex, and Cimarex
Nevada Acquisition Co., referred to as Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex, and the merger contemplated thereby, in which Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnum Hunter.
- 2.
- To transact any other business that may be properly brought before the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice.
The board of directors of Magnum Hunter unanimously:
- (i)
- has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests
of, Magnum Hunter and its stockholders;
- (ii)
- has approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby; and
- (iii)
- recommends that the stockholders of Magnum Hunter vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
The board of directors has fixed April 15, 2005, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 15, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting. A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be maintained in Magnum Hunter's offices at 600 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039, for ten days before the special meeting. The enclosed proxy is solicited by the board of directors of Magnum Hunter. All stockholders are invited to attend the special meeting in person. To ensure your representation at the special meeting, you are urged to vote by completing, signing and dating the accompanying proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
You may revoke your proxy in the manner described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus at any time before it has been voted. Any stockholder attending the special meeting may vote in person even if he, she or it has returned a proxy.
IMPORTANT: WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, WE ASK YOU TO COMPLETE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
| By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
|
|
||
Richard R. Frazier President and Chief Executive Officer |
||
Irving, Texas April 29, 2005 |
Please do not send your stock certificates at this time. If the merger is completed, you will be sent written instructions for exchanging your stock certificates.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference important business and financial information about Cimarex that is not included in or delivered with this document. Such information is included in Cimarex's documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to as the SEC, which are available without charge from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. See "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9.
Copies of the documents relating to Cimarex may also be obtained without charge from Cimarex on the Internet at www.cimarex.com, under the "Investor Relations" section, or by contacting Cimarex, Attn: Mary Kay Rohrer, Assistant Corporate Secretary, 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203-4518, telephone (303) 295-3995. Information contained on Cimarex's website does not constitute part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Cimarex includes its website address in this joint proxy statement/prospectus only as an inactive textual reference and does not intend it to be an active link to Cimarex's website. Reports and other information concerning Cimarex can also be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
If you wish to obtain any of these documents from Cimarex, you should, to ensure timely delivery, make your request no later than May 27, 2005.
All information in this document concerning Cimarex has been furnished by Cimarex. All information in this document concerning Magnum Hunter has been furnished by Magnum Hunter. Cimarex has represented to Magnum Hunter, and Magnum Hunter has represented to Cimarex, that the information furnished by and concerning it is true and complete.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
- Q:
- Why are Cimarex and Magnum Hunter proposing the merger?
- A:
- Cimarex believes that the merger will provide it with:
- •
- the
opportunity to expand in its existing core areas and to add new projects, without jeopardizing its strong financial position;
- •
- a
substantial footprint in the Permian Basin from which Cimarex can grow;
- •
- complementary
operations in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas;
- •
- measured
exposure to high potential projects in the Gulf of Mexico; and
- •
- the ability to greatly expand its balanced-risk drilling program underpinned by a strong balance sheet.
Magnum Hunter believes that the merger will provide its stockholders with:
- •
- a
premium over the trading price of Magnum Hunter common stock at the time the transaction was announced; and
- •
- the opportunity to participate in a combined enterprise with a highly skilled employee group, enhanced financial strength, and growth opportunities to further build stockholder value.
Please review the more detailed description of our reasons for the merger on pages I-52 and I-54.
- Q:
- What will happen if the merger is completed?
- A:
- Cimarex will acquire Magnum Hunter through the merger of Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex, with and into Magnum Hunter. Magnum Hunter will be
the surviving corporation in the merger and, after the merger, Magnum Hunter will continue as a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex.
- Q:
- When will the merger be completed?
- A:
- The merger will be completed when the conditions described below under "The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger" are satisfied
(or, where permitted, waived). Fulfilling some of these conditions, such as required regulatory approvals, is not entirely within our control. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter believe that they can complete
the merger during the second quarter of 2005. There can be no guarantee, however, as to when all conditions to the merger will be satisfied (or, where permitted, waived) and when, if at all, the
closing of the merger will take place. See "—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Merger" beginning on page I-29.
- Q:
- What do I need to do now?
- A:
- After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this document, please fill out and sign your proxy card, or (for Cimarex stockholders) vote by mail, telephone or on the Internet according to the instructions provided on the proxy card. Please mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope, or (for Cimarex stockholders) vote by phone or on the Internet, as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at the Cimarex annual meeting or the Magnum Hunter special meeting, as applicable. Your proxy will instruct the persons named on the proxy card to vote your shares at the Cimarex annual meeting or the Magnum Hunter special meeting, as applicable, as you direct on the card.
I-1
- Q:
- May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy?
- A:
- Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Cimarex annual meeting or the Magnum Hunter special meeting, as applicable. You can
do this in several ways. First, you can send a written notice stating that you would like to revoke your proxy. Second, you can complete and submit a new proxy card. Third, if you are a Cimarex
stockholder and choose to vote by telephone or on the Internet, you may change your vote by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions given to you when you call or visit the Internet
site. Fourth, you can attend the Cimarex annual meeting or the Magnum Hunter special meeting, as applicable, and vote in person. If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow
directions received from your broker to change your vote. Further information about these procedures is contained in "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other
Information—The Cimarex Annual Meeting" on page III-1 and "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—The Magnum Hunter
Special Meeting" on page III-4.
- Q:
- Do I have dissenters' rights of appraisal?
- A:
- Neither Cimarex common stockholders nor Magnum Hunter common stockholders will have dissenters' rights of appraisal as a result of the merger.
Holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock will have dissenters' rights of appraisal as a result of the merger. See "—The Merger—Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal" beginning on page I-88.
- Q:
- Who will be the directors of the combined company?
- A:
- Assuming Cimarex stockholders approve the proposal to increase the maximum size of the Cimarex board, the board of directors of the combined company will
consist of the nine then-current directors of Cimarex plus one current Magnum Hunter director to be selected by Cimarex before the effective time of the merger.
- Q:
- Where can I find more information about Cimarex and Magnum Hunter?
- A:
- You can find more information about Cimarex and Magnum Hunter from various sources described under "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9.
- Q:
- When and where is the annual meeting of the Cimarex stockholders?
- A:
- The Cimarex annual meeting will take place on June 6, 2005 at 10:30 a.m., local time. The location of the annual meeting is the Central City
Room at the Brown Palace Hotel, 321 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.
- Q:
- What are Cimarex stockholders being asked to vote upon?
- A:
- Cimarex stockholders are voting on a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock to stockholders of Magnum Hunter in connection with the merger. This stockholder vote is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, referred to as the NYSE, because the aggregate number of shares of Cimarex common stock to be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger will exceed 20% of the total number of shares of Cimarex common stock issued and outstanding immediately before the completion of the merger. The approval of the issuance of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger is a condition to the closing of the merger.
In addition, Cimarex stockholders are voting on two proposals to amend Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation, referred to as the Cimarex charter. The first proposal would increase the number of shares of common stock that Cimarex is authorized to issue from 100 million
I-2
shares to 200 million shares. The second proposal would increase the maximum size of Cimarex's board of directors from nine to ten directors. Cimarex stockholders are also voting on a proposal to increase the number of shares available for grants under the Cimarex Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, referred to as the Cimarex incentive plan, from seven million shares to 12.7 million shares and make other changes to the Cimarex incentive plan as discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Approval of these amendments is not a condition to the closing of the merger, and the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan, if approved, will be effected regardless of the outcome of the vote on the share issuance. Neither of the amendments to the Cimarex charter will be effected unless the merger takes place.
Finally, Cimarex is proposing to elect three directors to serve until the 2008 annual meeting and to ratify its audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005.
- Q:
- How will Cimarex stockholders be affected by the merger and share issuance?
- A:
- After the merger, each Cimarex stockholder will have the same number of shares of Cimarex common stock that the stockholder held immediately before the merger.
However, because Cimarex will be issuing new shares of Cimarex common stock to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger, each outstanding share of Cimarex common stock immediately before the merger
will represent a smaller percentage of the aggregate number of shares of Cimarex common stock outstanding after the merger. As a result of the merger, each Cimarex stockholder will own shares in a
larger company with more assets.
- Q:
- What are the tax consequences of the merger?
- A:
- Cimarex and Magnum Hunter intend for the merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, referred to as the Code. Cimarex stockholders will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the merger. For a summary of the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the merger that are expected to be material to Magnum Hunter stockholders, see "—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on
page I-92.
- Q:
- What vote of Cimarex stockholders is required to approve the proposals at the Cimarex annual meeting?
- A:
- Assuming a quorum is present at the Cimarex annual meeting, the approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger and the approval of the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting.
Under applicable Delaware law, the approval of each proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock as of the record date for the Cimarex annual meeting.
Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes. A "plurality" means that the three director nominees receiving the most "FOR" votes will be elected as Class III directors. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have an effect on the votes for or against the election of a director. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting is required to ratify the audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for 2005.
- Q:
- Does Cimarex's board of directors support the merger?
- A:
- Yes. The Cimarex board of directors, by unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting, has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
I-3
merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of, Cimarex and its stockholders; approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby; and recommended that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger.
For a more detailed description of the background and reasons for the merger, see "—The Merger—Cimarex's Reasons for the Merger and Share Issuance" beginning on page I-52 and "—The Merger—Magnum Hunter's Reasons for the Merger" beginning on page I-54.
- Q:
- Does Cimarex's board of directors support the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter and the Cimarex incentive plan?
- A:
- Yes. The Cimarex board of directors, by unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting, has approved and recommended that the stockholders of Cimarex
vote "FOR" approval of each of the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter and "FOR" approval of the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan.
- Q:
- How do I vote my shares if they are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee?
- A:
- Your bank, broker or other nominee will vote your shares of Cimarex common stock with respect to the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger, the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter or the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan only if you provide written instructions to them on how to vote, so it is important that you provide them with instructions. If you do not provide them with instructions, under the rules of the NYSE, they will not be authorized to vote with respect to the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger or the other proposals to be presented at the Cimarex annual meeting. If you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting and hold your shares in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you must contact your bank, broker or other nominee and request an appropriate proxy. You must bring this proxy to the annual meeting in order to vote in person.
If you are a participant in the Cimarex 401(k) plan and you have shares of Cimarex common stock allocated to your account, you may instruct the plan trustee on how to vote your shares. You will receive instructions from the trustee or the plan administrator on how to give instructions and the effect of not giving instructions.
- Q:
- What if I do not vote, or abstain from voting, my shares of Cimarex common stock?
- A:
- Neither an abstention nor a failure to vote will affect the outcome of the vote regarding the issuance of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger, the proposal to amend the Cimarex incentive plan, the election of Cimarex directors or the ratification of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for 2005, since they will not be counted as votes either for or against the proposals.
Abstentions and failures to vote (including broker non-votes) with respect to either of the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter will have the effect of a vote against that amendment.
If you sign your proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote, your shares of Cimarex common stock will be voted "FOR" approval of the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger, "FOR" each proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter, "FOR" the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan, "FOR" each named nominee for director and "FOR" the ratification of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for 2005.
- Q:
- Are there risks associated with the merger that I should consider in deciding how to vote?
- A:
- Yes. There are risks associated with all business combinations, including this merger. In particular, you should be aware that the exchange ratio determining the number of shares of Cimarex common
I-4
stock that Cimarex will issue in return for shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger is fixed and will not change as the market price of shares of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter common stock fluctuates in the period before the merger. Accordingly, the value of the shares of Cimarex common stock that Cimarex will issue in the merger in return for shares of Magnum Hunter common stock may be either less than or more than the current price of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock. There are also a number of other risks that are discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Please read with particular care the more detailed description of the risks associated with the merger and the combined company's operations following the merger under "—Risk Factors" beginning on page I-29.
- Q:
- Who should I contact if I have questions?
- A:
- If you have any questions about the merger agreement, the merger or the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger, or if you need additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact Cimarex, Attn: Mary Kay Rohrer, Assistant Corporate Secretary, 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203-4518, telephone (303) 295-3995. You may also call Cimarex's proxy solicitor, Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc. toll-free at (866) 288-2196.
For Magnum Hunter Stockholders
- Q:
- When and where is the special meeting of the Magnum Hunter stockholders?
- A:
- The Magnum Hunter special meeting will take place on June 6, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., local time. The location of the special meeting is the Four
Seasons Resort and Club, 4150 North MacArthur Blvd., Irving, Texas 75038.
- Q:
- What are Magnum Hunter stockholders being asked to vote upon?
- A:
- Magnum Hunter stockholders are voting on a proposal to approve the merger agreement entered into among Cimarex, Merger Sub and Magnum Hunter, and the merger
contemplated by the merger agreement. Approval of the merger agreement and the merger by the stockholders of Magnum Hunter is a condition to the closing of the merger.
- Q:
- What will Magnum Hunter common stockholders receive in the merger?
- A:
- At the effective time of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock of Magnum Hunter will be canceled and converted into the right to receive
0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock, as described under "The Merger—Merger Consideration." The ratio of 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common
stock is referred to as the exchange ratio.
- Q:
- What will happen to options to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger?
- A:
- Magnum Hunter has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the consent of holders of all options to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock that require consent for cancellation of the options. Magnum Hunter also will cause all stock options that do not require consent for cancellation to be canceled as of the effective time of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, the holder of each canceled stock option will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the product of the total number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option (whether vested or unvested) times the excess, if any, of the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date over the exercise price of the option, less applicable withholding taxes. Options with exercise prices higher than the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on that date will not be entitled to any cash payment.
If Magnum Hunter does not receive consent before the effective time to cancel any options that require consent for cancellation, those options will be assumed by Cimarex. Any assumed options will
I-5
be converted into an option to purchase that number of shares of Cimarex common stock determined by multiplying the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to that option at the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio. The exercise price per share of each assumed option will be equal to the exercise price per share of the existing option divided by the exchange ratio. Each assumed option will remain subject to the same conditions that applied before the merger, except that upon closing of the merger, each option will be fully vested.
Promptly following the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will cause the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon exercise of any assumed options to be registered with the SEC and listed on the NYSE, and will use all reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of that registration statement for so long as any assumed options remain outstanding.
- Q:
- What will happen to Magnum Hunter's preferred stock?
- A:
- Magnum Hunter currently has two series of preferred stock outstanding, the Series A preferred stock and the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock. At the effective time of the merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 20 shares of Cimarex common stock. Based upon the 80,000 shares of Series A preferred stock currently outstanding, holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock would receive 0.00025 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Series A preferred stock that they own. See "—The Merger—Merger Consideration" on page I-86.
Before the effective time of the merger, Magnum Hunter will cause its wholly owned subsidiary that owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock to convert those shares into Magnum Hunter common stock, on the terms set forth in the certificate of designations for the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock. The shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issued upon conversion of the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock will then be canceled and exchanged in the merger for shares of Cimarex common stock in accordance with the exchange ratio.
- Q:
- What will happen to the notes issued under Magnum Hunter's indentures?
- A:
- Magnum Hunter currently has two series of notes outstanding, the 9.6% senior notes due 2012 and the floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023. The indentures under which each series of notes was issued permit the holders of the notes to sell their notes back to Magnum Hunter upon a change of control of Magnum Hunter, such as the merger, for a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the 9.6% senior notes plus accrued interest, and 100% of the principal amount of the convertible senior notes plus accrued interest. At or before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will execute a supplemental indenture with the trustee under the indenture covering the convertible senior notes, with respect to the conversion provisions. See "—The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Indenture Obligations and Notes" on page I-132.
Upon the happening of certain events, the convertible senior notes are convertible into cash in the amount of the principal amount of the notes, plus shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to the extent the conversion value exceeds the principal amount. After the merger, the portion of the convertible senior notes that is convertible into stock will become convertible into shares of Cimarex common stock. Before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will file a registration statement with the SEC covering the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible senior notes. Cimarex has agreed to use all reasonable efforts to have such registration statement declared effective at the effective time of the merger and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement for so long as any convertible senior notes remain outstanding.
I-6
- Q:
- What will happen to Magnum Hunter's credit facility?
- A:
- Cimarex intends to pay off Magnum Hunter's credit facility at the closing of the merger. Cimarex and its bank group are currently negotiating a new credit
facility or an expansion of Cimarex's existing credit facility. See "—The Merger—Credit Facilities" on page I-91.
- Q:
- Will Magnum Hunter's shares of common stock continue to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange after the merger is completed?
- A:
- No. If the merger is completed, Magnum Hunter's shares of common stock will no longer be listed for trading on the NYSE. However, the shares of Cimarex common
stock that you receive in the merger will be listed on the NYSE.
- Q:
- Will I be able to trade the Cimarex common stock that I receive in connection with the merger?
- A:
- Yes. The shares of Cimarex common stock issued in connection with the merger will be freely tradable, unless you are an affiliate of Magnum Hunter. Generally,
persons who are deemed to be affiliates of Magnum Hunter must comply with Rule 145 under the Securities Act of 1933 if they wish to sell or otherwise transfer any of the shares of Cimarex
common stock they receive in connection with the merger. You will be notified if you are an affiliate of Magnum Hunter.
- Q:
- What are the tax consequences of the merger?
- A:
- Cimarex and Magnum Hunter intend for the merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. As a result, U.S.
holders (as defined in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) of Magnum Hunter common stock generally will not, and U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock generally should not,
recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the merger, except with respect to the amount of cash received instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock by
U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and except with respect to any cash received by U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exercise appraisal rights. Magnum Hunter
stockholders who are non-U.S. holders (as defined in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) may recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the merger,
depending on their individual circumstances. For a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to be material to Magnum Hunter stockholders, see
"—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page I-92.
- Q:
- What vote of Magnum Hunter stockholders will be required to approve the merger agreement and the merger?
- A:
- The approval of the merger agreement and the merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock
issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting. As of March 9, 2005, there were 2,612 record holders of Magnum Hunter common stock. Magnum Hunter's President
and Chief Executive Officer and a related stockholder, who together held an aggregate of approximately 4.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock entitled to vote as of
March 31, 2005, have entered into a voting agreement with Cimarex under which each stockholder party has agreed, among other things, to vote his or its shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in
favor of the approval of the merger agreement and the merger contemplated thereby. See "—The Merger Agreement—Voting Agreement" beginning on page I-133.
- Q:
- Does Magnum Hunter's board of directors support the merger?
- A:
- Yes. The Magnum Hunter board of directors has unanimously: determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best
I-7
interests of, Magnum Hunter and its stockholders; approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby; and recommended that the stockholders of Magnum Hunter vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
For a more detailed description of the background and reasons for the merger, see "—The Merger—Background of the Merger" beginning on page I-45.
- Q:
- How do I vote my shares if they are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee?
- A:
- Your bank, broker or other nominee will vote your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock with respect to the merger agreement and the merger only if you provide written instructions to them on how to vote, so it is important that you provide them with instructions. If you do not provide them with instructions, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, they will not be authorized to vote with respect to the merger agreement. If you wish to vote in person at the special meeting and hold your shares in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you must contact your bank, broker or other nominee and request an appropriate proxy. You must bring this proxy to the special meeting in order to vote in person.
If you are a participant in the Magnum Hunter 401(k) employee stock ownership plan and you have shares of Magnum Hunter common stock allocated to your account, you may instruct the plan trustee on how to vote your shares. You will receive instructions from the trustee or the plan administrator on how to give instructions and the effect of not giving instructions.
- Q:
- What if I do not vote, or abstain from voting, my shares of Magnum Hunter common stock?
- A:
- If you do not vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against the merger agreement and the merger. Abstentions and broker non-votes will also have the effect of votes against the merger agreement and the merger.
If you sign your proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote, your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will be voted "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
- Q:
- Should I send in my stock certificates now?
- A:
- No. If the merger is completed, you will be sent written instructions for exchanging your stock certificates. Please do not send in your stock certificates with
your proxy.
- Q:
- Are there risks associated with the merger that I should consider in deciding how to vote?
- A:
- Yes. There are risks associated with all business combinations, including this merger. In particular, you should be aware that the exchange ratio determining
the number of shares of Cimarex common stock that Magnum Hunter stockholders will receive is fixed and will not change as the market price of shares of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter common stock fluctuates
in the period before the merger. Accordingly, the value of the shares of Cimarex common stock that you as a Magnum Hunter stockholder will receive in the merger in return for your shares of Magnum
Hunter common stock may be either less than or more than the current price of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock that you currently hold. There are also a number of other risks that are
discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Please read with particular care the more detailed description of the risks associated with the merger and the combined company's operations
following the merger under "—Risk Factors" beginning on page I-29.
- Q:
- Who should I contact if I have questions?
- A:
- If you have any questions about the merger agreement or the merger, or if you need additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact Magnum Hunter, Attn: Morgan F. Johnston, Corporate Secretary, 600 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039, telephone (972) 401-0752. You may also call Magnum Hunter's proxy solicitor, Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc. toll-free at (866) 288-2196.
I-8
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter have made certain statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that may be deemed "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, referred to as the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to as the Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events, outcomes and other matters that Cimarex, Magnum Hunter or the combined company plans, expects, intends, assumes, believes, budgets, predicts, forecasts, projects, estimates or anticipates (and other similar expressions) will, should or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the current belief of management of the companies, based on currently available information, as to the outcome and timing of future events. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Forward-looking statements occur, among other places, in the following sections of Chapter I of this document:
- •
- "Questions
and Answers About the Merger";
- •
- "Summary—Selected
Historical Financial Data of Cimarex"; "—Selected Historical Financial Data of Magnum Hunter"; and "—Selected Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined Financial Data";
- •
- "Comparative
Per Share Information";
- •
- "Comparative
Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information";
- •
- "Risk
Factors";
- •
- "The
Merger—Background of the Merger"; "—Cimarex's Reasons for the Merger and Share Issuance"; "—Recommendation of the Cimarex Board of
Directors"; "—Magnum Hunter's Reasons for the Merger"; and "—Recommendation of the Magnum Hunter Board of Directors";
- •
- "The
Merger—Opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc. to the Cimarex Board of Directors"; "—Opinions of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc." and "—Opinions of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated";
- •
- "Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements"; and
- •
- Statements contained elsewhere in this document concerning Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's plans for the combined company's growth and future operations or financial position.
We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production and sale of oil and gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of goods and services, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating proved oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures and other risks described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact way. The accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available data and the interpretation of the data by our engineers. As a result, estimates made by different engineers often vary from one another. In addition, the results of drilling, testing and production activities may justify revisions of estimates that were made previously. If significant, these revisions could change the schedule of any future production and development drilling. Accordingly, reserve estimates are generally different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.
I-9
Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described above or elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the actual future results and stockholder values of Cimarex, Magnum Hunter and the combined company may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are beyond Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's ability to control or predict. Stockholders of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
You should understand that various factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, could affect the future results of the combined company following the merger and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including:
- •
- the
possibility that the companies may be unable to obtain stockholder or regulatory approvals required for the acquisition;
- •
- the
possibility that problems may arise in successfully integrating the businesses of the two companies;
- •
- the
possibility that the acquisition may involve unexpected costs;
- •
- the
possibility that the combined company may be unable to achieve cost-cutting synergies;
- •
- the
possibility that the businesses may suffer as a result of uncertainty surrounding the acquisition;
- •
- the
possibility that the industry may be subject to future regulatory or legislative actions;
- •
- the
volatility in commodity prices for oil and gas;
- •
- the
presence or recoverability of estimated reserves;
- •
- the
ability to replace reserves;
- •
- environmental
risks;
- •
- drilling
and operating risks;
- •
- exploration
and development risks;
- •
- competition;
- •
- the
ability of management to execute its plans to meet its goals; and
- •
- other risks that are described in SEC reports filed by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter.
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all forward-looking statements, express or implied, included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and attributable to Cimarex or Magnum Hunter. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that Cimarex, Magnum Hunter, or persons acting on their respective behalf may issue. Except for their ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by the federal securities laws, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter do not have any intention, and do not undertake any obligation, to update forward-looking statements after they distribute this joint proxy statement/prospectus, even if new information, future events or other circumstances have made them incorrect or misleading.
I-10
This summary highlights selected information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus and does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. To understand the merger agreement and the merger fully and for a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger agreement, you should carefully read this entire document and the documents to which we refer you. See "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9. We have included page references parenthetically to direct you to a more complete description of the topics summarized here.
Cimarex
Energy Co.
1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800
Denver, Colorado 80203-4518
(303) 295-3995
Internet address: www.cimarex.com
Cimarex is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company. Its principal areas of operations are located in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, and Louisiana. Cimarex also has active exploration and development programs underway in each of those states as well as in California, New Mexico and Mississippi. Cimarex's principal operations offices are at 15 East 5th Street, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, telephone (918) 585-1100. Cimarex's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol "XEC."
Magnum
Hunter Resources, Inc.
600 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Suite 1100
Irving, Texas 75039
(972) 401-0752
Internet address: www.magnumhunter.com
Magnum Hunter is an independent energy company engaged in the exploration, exploitation and development, acquisition and operation of oil and gas properties with a geographic focus in the Mid-Continent Region, Permian Basin Region, Gulf Coast Region and the Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, Magnum Hunter owns and operates five gas gathering systems covering over 480 miles and holds a 50% or greater ownership interest in four natural gas processing plants that are located adjacent to certain company-owned and operated producing properties within the states of Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas. Magnum Hunter's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol "MHR."
Structure of the Merger (page I-45)
Under the terms of the proposed merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnum Hunter, with Magnum Hunter continuing as the surviving corporation. As a result of the merger, Magnum Hunter will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex.
What Magnum Hunter Stockholders Will Receive in the Merger (page I-86)
In the merger, holders of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will receive 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. This ratio is referred to as the exchange ratio. Magnum Hunter common stockholders will receive cash for any fractional shares which they would otherwise receive in the merger.
I-11
In the merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 20 shares of Cimarex common stock. Based upon the 80,000 shares of Series A preferred stock currently outstanding, holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock would receive 0.00025 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Series A preferred stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stockholders will receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock to the extent necessary. However, Cimarex may offer Series A preferred stockholders the opportunity either to purchase an additional fraction of a share or to aggregate its fractional share with those of other Series A preferred stockholders to be sold. Cimarex may not force Series A preferred stockholders to receive cash in respect of their fractional shares.
Treatment of Magnum Hunter Stock Options (page I-131)
Magnum Hunter has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the consent of holders of all options to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock that require consent for cancellation of the options. Magnum Hunter also will cause all stock options that do not require consent for cancellation to be canceled as of the effective time of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, the holder of each canceled stock option will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the product of the total number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option (whether vested or unvested), times the excess, if any, of the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date over the exercise price of the option, less the amount of any required withholding taxes. Options with exercise prices higher than the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on that date will not be entitled to any cash payment.
Any options requiring consent for cancellation as to which Magnum Hunter does not receive consent before the effective time will be assumed by Cimarex, and converted into an option to purchase that number of shares of Cimarex common stock determined by multiplying the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option at the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio. The exercise price per share of each assumed option will be equal to the exercise price per share of the existing option divided by the exchange ratio. Each assumed option will remain subject to the same conditions that applied before the merger, except that each option will be fully vested.
Promptly following the effective time of the merger, Cimarex has agreed to cause the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon exercise of any assumed options to be registered with the SEC, and will use all reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of that registration statement for so long as any assumed options remain outstanding.
Treatment of Magnum Hunter 1996 Series A Preferred Stock (page I-112)
All 1,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock are currently held by a wholly owned subsidiary of Magnum Hunter. Before the effective time of the merger, Magnum Hunter will cause its subsidiary to convert all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock into Magnum Hunter common stock, on the terms set forth in the certificate of designations for the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock. The shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issued upon conversion of the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock will then be canceled and exchanged in the merger for shares of Cimarex common stock in accordance with the exchange ratio.
Treatment of Magnum Hunter Indebtedness (page I-132)
The indentures under which Magnum Hunter's $195 million 9.6% senior notes due 2012 and $125 million floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023 were issued permit the holders of the notes
I-12
to sell their notes back to Magnum Hunter upon a change of control of Magnum Hunter, for a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the 9.6% senior notes plus accrued interest, and 100% of the principal amount of the convertible senior notes plus accrued interest. The interest rate on the convertible senior notes is a floating interest rate based on three-month LIBOR, which as of December 31, 2004 was 2.49%. The merger qualifies as a change of control for these purposes. Magnum Hunter as the surviving corporation will be obligated to buy back any notes that are offered in accordance with these provisions.
At or before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will execute a supplemental indenture with the trustee under the indenture covering the convertible senior notes, with respect to the conversion provisions of those notes. After the merger, the convertible senior notes will be convertible into cash in the amount of the principal amount of the notes, plus shares of Cimarex common stock to the extent the conversion value exceeds the principal amount. Before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will file a registration statement with the SEC covering the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible senior notes. Cimarex has agreed to use all reasonable efforts to have such registration statement declared effective at the effective time of the merger and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement for so long as any convertible senior notes remain outstanding.
Cimarex intends to pay off Magnum Hunter's existing credit facility at the closing of the merger.
Distribution of TEL Offshore Trust Units (page I-88)
Magnum Hunter currently owns approximately 1.4 million trust units, which represents 29.1% of the outstanding trust units, of TEL Offshore Trust. Before the merger, Magnum Hunter's board of directors intends to distribute these trust units to the holders of Magnum Hunter common stock as of April 18, 2005, the distribution record date selected by the Magnum Hunter board. In the distribution, each holder of Magnum Hunter common stock (other than Magnum Hunter and its subsidiaries) will receive a percentage of TEL Offshore Trust units equal to the percentage of Magnum Hunter common stock it holds, and cash instead of any fractional units it would otherwise be entitled to receive.
TEL Offshore Trust's trust units are traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol "TELOZ." On January 25, 2005, the last full trading day on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market before the public announcement of the proposed merger, the closing price of TEL Offshore Trust's trust units was $10.97 per unit. On April 28, 2005, the most recent trading day practicable before the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the closing price of TEL Offshore Trust's trust units was $7.27 per unit.
Ownership of Cimarex After the Merger (page I-45)
Based on the number of outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock on March 31, 2005, we anticipate that Magnum Hunter stockholders will receive approximately 39.5 million shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger (excluding 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter). Based on that number and on the number of outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock as of the record date relating to the Cimarex annual meeting, following the merger, former Magnum Hunter stockholders will own 48.6% of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock and current Cimarex stockholders will own 51.4% of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock. These numbers do not give effect to shares that may be issued upon exercise of outstanding Cimarex or Magnum Hunter stock options or upon conversion of Magnum Hunter convertible senior notes.
I-13
Board of Directors After the Merger (page II-1)
After the merger and assuming that Cimarex stockholders approve the proposal to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum size of its board of directors from nine to ten directors, the combined company will have ten directors. The board will consist of the nine members of Cimarex's board of directors then in office and one current member of the Magnum Hunter board of directors to be selected by Cimarex before the effective time of the merger.
Matters to Consider in Deciding How to Vote
Board of Directors' Recommendations to Stockholders (pages I-53 and I-56)
The board of directors of Cimarex, by unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting, has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of, Cimarex and its stockholders and recommends that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger. Also by unanimous vote of the directors present, the Cimarex board of directors has approved and recommended that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of each proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter and "FOR" approval of the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan.
The board of directors of Magnum Hunter has unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of, Magnum Hunter and its stockholders and recommends that the stockholders of Magnum Hunter vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
Reasons for the Merger (pages I-52 and I-54)
Cimarex believes that the merger will provide it with:
- •
- the
opportunity to expand in its existing core areas and to add new projects, without jeopardizing its strong financial position;
- •
- a
substantial footprint in the Permian Basin from which Cimarex can grow;
- •
- complementary
operations in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas;
- •
- measured
exposure to high potential projects in the Gulf of Mexico; and
- •
- the ability to greatly expand its balanced-risk drilling program underpinned by a strong balance sheet.
Magnum Hunter believes that the merger will provide its stockholders with:
- •
- a
premium over the trading price of Magnum Hunter common stock at the time the transaction was announced; and
- •
- the opportunity to participate in a combined enterprise with a highly skilled employee group, enhanced financial strength, and growth opportunities to further build stockholder value.
Please review the more detailed description of our reasons for the merger beginning on pages I-52 and I-54.
Financial Advisors (pages I-56, I-66 and I-78)
Cimarex's Financial Advisor and Fairness Opinion. Cimarex retained Petrie Parkman & Co., referred to as Petrie Parkman, to act as its financial advisor in connection with the merger. Petrie
I-14
Parkman was not requested to, and did not, render an opinion to the Cimarex board of directors in connection with the merger.
Lehman Brothers Inc., referred to as Lehman Brothers, delivered a written opinion to the Cimarex board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Cimarex of the exchange ratio to be paid by Cimarex in the merger. The full text of Lehman Brothers' written opinion, dated January 25, 2005, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B. We encourage you to read this opinion carefully in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, and qualifications and limitations of the review undertaken. Lehman Brothers' opinion was provided to the Cimarex board of directors in connection with its consideration of the merger, and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Cimarex as to whether to vote for or against the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger.
Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors and Fairness Opinions. Magnum Hunter retained Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., referred to as Deutsche Bank, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, referred to as Merrill Lynch, to act as its financial advisors in connection with the merger. Each of Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch delivered a written opinion to the Magnum Hunter board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio provided for in the merger. The full text of Deutsche Bank's written opinion, dated January 25, 2005, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C and the full text of Merrill Lynch's written opinion, dated January 25, 2005, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex D. We encourage you to read these opinions carefully in their entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken. Each of Deutsche Bank's and Merrill Lynch's opinions was intended for the use and benefit of the board of directors of Magnum Hunter, does not address the merits of the underlying decision by Magnum Hunter to engage in the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how that stockholder should vote on the merger or any related matter.
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger (page I-104)
When considering the recommendation of Cimarex's board of directors with respect to the issuance of Cimarex common stock and the recommendation of Magnum Hunter's board of directors with respect to the merger agreement and the merger, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter stockholders, respectively, should be aware that certain executive officers and directors of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter stockholders generally. For a more detailed description of these interests, see "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" beginning on page I-104.
Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's boards of directors were aware of these interests and considered them in making their recommendations.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (page I-92)
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter intend for the merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. As a result, U.S. holders (as defined in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) of Magnum Hunter common stock generally will not, and U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock generally should not, recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the merger, except with respect to the amount of cash received instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock by U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and except with respect to any cash received by U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exercise appraisal rights. Magnum Hunter stockholders who are non-U.S. holders (as defined in this joint proxy statement prospectus) may recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the merger, depending on their individual circumstances. Although the
I-15
U.S. federal income tax treatment of Magnum Hunter's potential pre-merger distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units, or possibly cash instead of TEL Offshore Trust units, is not entirely free from doubt, it is expected that the receipt of the units or cash by holders of Magnum Hunter common stock should be taxed as a dividend distribution that is separate from the merger. Holders of Cimarex common stock will not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the merger. For a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to be material to Magnum Hunter stockholders, see "—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page I-92.
Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to you will depend on the facts of your particular situation. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger to you.
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal (page I-88)
Holders of Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock are not entitled to dissenters' rights of appraisal in connection with the merger.
Holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock are entitled to dissenters' rights of appraisal in connection with the merger.
Accounting Treatment of the Merger (page I-88)
Cimarex will account for the merger under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Regulatory Approvals (page I-90)
The merger is subject to antitrust laws. On February 16, 2005, each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter made its initial filings under applicable antitrust laws with the United States Department of Justice and the United States Federal Trade Commission. The waiting period prescribed by these antitrust laws expired on March 17, 2005. However, the reviewing agencies or governments, states or private persons, may challenge the merger at any time before or after its completion.
Legal Proceedings Related to the Merger (page I-90)
On March 17, 2005, a class action complaint was served on Magnum Hunter and each member of Magnum Hunter's board of directors. The complaint seeks to enjoin the merger and obtain appropriate compensatory damages for Magnum Hunter's stockholders. Magnum Hunter and the other named defendants believe that the allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend the action.
Market Price Information (page I-27)
Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's common stock are each listed on the NYSE. On January 25, 2005, the last full trading day on the NYSE before the public announcement of the proposed merger, Cimarex common stock closed at $40.18 per share and Magnum Hunter common stock closed at $13.24 per share. Based on the exchange ratio of 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock, the pro forma equivalent per share value of the Magnum Hunter common stock on January 25, 2005 was approximately $16.67.
On April 28, 2005, the most recent trading day practicable before the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Cimarex common stock closed at $35.26 per share and Magnum Hunter common stock closed at $14.38 per share. Based on the foregoing assumptions, the pro forma equivalent per share value of the Magnum Hunter common stock on April 28, 2005 was approximately $14.63 per share.
I-16
Material Differences in the Rights of Stockholders (page I-158)
The rights of Magnum Hunter stockholders are governed by Nevada law and by Magnum Hunter's amended articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. Upon completion of the merger, Magnum Hunter stockholders' rights as stockholders of Cimarex will be governed by Delaware law and by Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Nevada law and Magnum Hunter's articles of incorporation and bylaws differ from Delaware law and Cimarex's certificate of incorporation and bylaws in some material respects. For more information on these differences, see "Comparison of Stockholder Rights" beginning on page I-158.
Risk Factors (page I-29)
In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors," beginning on page I-29 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus in deciding whether to vote in favor of the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger, in the case of Cimarex stockholders, or in favor of the merger agreement, in the case of Magnum Hunter stockholders.
The Merger Agreement (page I-112)
The merger agreement, as amended, is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the merger agreement carefully and fully as it is the legal document that governs the merger.
Conditions to the Closing of the Merger (page I-113)
Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's respective obligations to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent legally permissible, the waiver of the following conditions:
- •
- the
approval of the merger agreement and the merger by Magnum Hunter's stockholders and the approval of the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger by Cimarex's
stockholders;
- •
- the
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and receipt of all
other applicable material governmental and regulatory approvals;
- •
- the
effectiveness with the SEC of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part;
- •
- the
absence of any law, order or injunction prohibiting completion of the merger;
- •
- the
approval for listing on the NYSE of the Cimarex common stock to be issued in the merger and upon exercise of any outstanding options to be assumed by Cimarex, subject to
official notice of issuance;
- •
- material
accuracy, as of the closing, of the representations and warranties made by the parties and material compliance by the parties with their respective covenants and
agreements under the merger agreement; and
- •
- the absence of any change that would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on either Cimarex or Magnum Hunter.
In addition, Cimarex's obligation to complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent legally permissible, the waiver of the following conditions:
- •
- the
receipt by Cimarex of an opinion of its tax counsel to the effect that, among other things, the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code;
- •
- the absence of any event which would trigger a distribution under Magnum Hunter's stockholder rights plan; and
I-17
- •
- the receipt by Magnum Hunter of all material consents and approvals (other than those of governmental and regulatory authorities) required in connection with the execution of the merger agreement and completion of the merger.
In addition, Magnum Hunter's obligation to complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent legally permissible, the waiver of the following conditions:
- •
- the
receipt by Magnum Hunter of an opinion of its tax counsel to the effect that, among other things, the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code;
- •
- the
absence of any event which would trigger a distribution under Cimarex's stockholder rights plan;
- •
- the
delivery by Cimarex to its transfer agent of instructions authorizing the issuance of Cimarex common stock to Magnum Hunter stockholders upon surrender of certificates
representing shares of Magnum Hunter common stock; and
- •
- the receipt by Cimarex of all material consents and approvals (other than those of governmental and regulatory authorities) required in connection with the execution of the merger agreement and completion of the merger.
No Solicitation of Takeover Proposals (page I-115)
The merger agreement contains detailed provisions prohibiting Magnum Hunter from seeking an alternative transaction. These "no solicitation" provisions prohibit Magnum Hunter, its officers, directors, employees and representatives from taking any action to solicit a takeover proposal. These provisions also prohibit these persons from recommending, participating in discussions regarding, or furnishing information with respect to any takeover proposal, although this is subject to some exceptions, including some exceptions that permit the directors of Magnum Hunter to comply with their fiduciary duties, after following specified procedures. In specified circumstances, the merger agreement permits Magnum Hunter's board of directors to terminate the merger agreement and accept a takeover proposal it determines to be superior to the merger, referred to as a superior proposal.
Termination of Merger Agreement (page I-117)
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time before the closing of the merger in any of the following ways:
The merger agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter.
Either Cimarex or Magnum Hunter may terminate the merger agreement if:
- •
- the
merger is not completed by July 25, 2005 (or October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement, of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is a part, effective by June 1, 2005), except that a party may not terminate the merger agreement if the cause of the merger not being completed is that party's breach of a
representation or warranty or failure to fulfill its obligations under the merger agreement;
- •
- a
governmental authority or a court issues an injunction or order permanently enjoining or prohibiting the completion of the merger, except that a party may not terminate
the merger agreement until that party has used all reasonable efforts to remove the injunction or order; or
- •
- either Cimarex's stockholders fail to approve the issuance of Cimarex common stock or Magnum Hunter's stockholders fail to approve the merger agreement and the merger.
I-18
In addition, Cimarex may terminate the merger agreement if:
- •
- Magnum
Hunter has breached in any material respect any of its representations or warranties, or has failed to perform in any material respect any of its covenants or
agreements under the merger agreement, if Cimarex gives notice of the breach and Magnum Hunter fails to cure the breach within 10 days following the notice, but no later than July 25,
2005 (or October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part, effective by June 1, 2005); or
- •
- Magnum Hunter's board of directors either withdraws or changes its recommendation in a manner adverse to Cimarex, recommends an alternative transaction or willfully and materially breaches its non-solicitation obligations described under "—No Solicitation of Takeover Proposals" above.
In addition, Magnum Hunter may terminate the merger agreement if:
- •
- Cimarex
has breached in any material respect any of its representations or warranties, or has failed to perform in any material respect any of its covenants or agreements
under the merger agreement, if Magnum Hunter gives notice of the breach and Cimarex fails to cure the breach within 10 days following the notice, but no later than July 25, 2005 (or
October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part effective by June 1, 2005); or
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's board of directors authorizes Magnum Hunter to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that Magnum Hunter's board of directors has
determined in accordance with the merger agreement is a superior proposal, except that Magnum Hunter cannot terminate the merger agreement for this reason unless:
- —
- Magnum
Hunter has not materially breached its non-solicitation obligations described under "—No Solicitation of Takeover Proposals" above;
- —
- Magnum
Hunter provides Cimarex with written notice that it intends to enter into such an agreement, attaching the most current version of the agreement or a description of
its material terms; and
- —
- Magnum Hunter pays Cimarex the fee described under "—Termination Fee" below before the termination.
Termination Fee (page I-119)
Magnum Hunter must pay Cimarex a termination fee of $45 million if:
- •
- the
merger agreement is terminated because of:
- —
- Magnum
Hunter's board of directors either withdrawing or changing its recommendation in a manner adverse to Cimarex, recommending an alternative transaction or willfully and
materially breaching its non-solicitation obligations described under "—No Solicitation of Takeover Proposals" above; or
- —
- Magnum
Hunter's board of directors authorizing Magnum Hunter to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that Magnum Hunter's board of directors has
determined in accordance with the merger agreement is a superior proposal, subject to the limitations described above; or
- •
- an alternative takeover proposal in respect of Magnum Hunter is publicly announced or is proposed or offered or made to Magnum Hunter or to the Magnum Hunter stockholders before the approval of the merger agreement by the Magnum Hunter stockholders, the merger agreement is terminated by Cimarex or Magnum Hunter because the Magnum Hunter stockholders do not approve the merger agreement, and within 12 months following the
I-19
termination, Magnum Hunter consummates or enters into an agreement or commitment with the proponent, or an affiliate of the proponent, of the alternative takeover proposal.
Magnum Hunter must pay the termination fee no later than one business day following termination of the merger agreement or, in the case of termination in connection with an alternative transaction, on the date of consummation of or entry into the agreement for that transaction.
Expenses (page I-119)
Each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter will bear all expenses it incurs in connection with the merger, except that Cimarex has agreed to pay the fee for filing the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part with the SEC, along with the expenses of printing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and complying with any other applicable securities laws in connection with the registration statement and this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Cimarex will pay all costs and expenses related to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Cimarex stockholders and soliciting the votes of Cimarex stockholders. Magnum Hunter will pay all costs and expenses related to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Magnum Hunter stockholders and soliciting the votes of Magnum Hunter stockholders.
Voting Agreement (page I-133)
On the date the merger agreement was executed, Gary C. Evans, Magnum Hunter's former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc., a related stockholder, entered into a voting agreement with Cimarex. As of March 31, 2005, these stockholders beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 3,943,794 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, which represented approximately 4.1% of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock outstanding on that date. Under the voting agreement, these stockholders agreed, among other things, to vote all of their shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in favor of the merger agreement, against any action or agreement that they would reasonably expect to result in a material breach of any covenant, representation, warranty or other obligation of Magnum Hunter under the merger agreement and against any other takeover proposal. The voting agreement is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The Meetings and Voting (pages III-1 and III-4)
Date and Time of the Meetings (pages III-1 and III-4)
The annual meeting of Cimarex stockholders will be held in the Central City Room at the Brown Palace Hotel, 321 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, at 10:30 a.m., local time, on June 6, 2005. At the annual meeting, Cimarex stockholders will be asked to approve:
- •
- the
issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger;
- •
- a
proposal to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100 million shares to 200 million shares;
- •
- a
proposal to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum size of the board of directors from nine to ten directors;
- •
- a
proposal to amend the Cimarex incentive plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan from seven million shares to 12.7 million
shares;
- •
- a
proposal to elect three directors to serve until the 2008 annual meeting; and
- •
- a proposal to ratify the audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005.
I-20
The special meeting of Magnum Hunter stockholders will be held at the Four Seasons Resort and Club, 4150 North MacArthur Blvd., Irving, Texas 75038, at 10:00 a.m., local time, on June 6, 2005. At the special meeting, Magnum Hunter stockholders will be asked to approve the merger agreement and the merger.
Record Date; Voting Power (pages III-2 and III-5)
Cimarex stockholders are entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting if they owned shares as of the close of business on April 29, 2005, referred to as the Cimarex record date. On the Cimarex record date, there were approximately 41,786,219 shares of Cimarex common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Stockholders will have one vote at the annual meeting for each share of Cimarex common stock they owned on the Cimarex record date.
Magnum Hunter stockholders are entitled to vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting if they owned shares as of the close of business on April 15, 2005, referred to as the Magnum Hunter record date. On the Magnum Hunter record date, there were approximately 95,187,747 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. Stockholders will have one vote at the special meeting for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock they owned on the Magnum Hunter record date.
Vote Required (pages III-2 and III-6)
At the Cimarex annual meeting, assuming a quorum is present:
- •
- the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting is required to approve the issuance of shares
of Cimarex common
stock in connection with the merger, the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan and the ratification of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for 2005;
- •
- the
affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock as of the record date for the Cimarex annual meeting is required to approve
each of the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter; and
- •
- directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast.
As of the April 29, 2005 record date, shares representing approximately 3.3% of the total outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock were held by Cimarex's directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates.
At the Magnum Hunter special meeting, assuming a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting is required to approve the merger agreement and the merger. As of the April 15, 2005 record date, shares representing approximately 6.3% of the total outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock were held by Magnum Hunter's directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates.
As further discussed below under "The Merger Agreement—Voting Agreement," on the date the merger agreement was executed, Cimarex entered into an agreement with Gary C. Evans, Magnum Hunter's former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc., a related stockholder, who as of March 31, 2005 collectively held an aggregate of approximately 4.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock. Under this agreement, each stockholder party has agreed, among other things, to vote his or its shares in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
Quorum, Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes (pages III-2 and III-6)
A quorum must be present to conduct business at each of the meetings. This means that at the Cimarex meeting, greater than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of Cimarex's record
I-21
date must be represented in person or by proxy. At the Magnum Hunter meeting, greater than one-third of the outstanding shares of common stock as of Magnum Hunter's record date must be represented in person or by proxy.
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for establishing a quorum at both meetings. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted in tabulating votes on the Cimarex and Magnum Hunter proposals but have the effect of a vote against the proposals to approve the merger agreement and amend the Cimarex charter. Abstentions and broker non-votes have no effect on the votes with respect to the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger, the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan, the election of Cimarex directors or the ratification of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for 2005.
An abstention occurs when a stockholder abstains from voting (either in person or by proxy) on one or more of the proposals. Broker non-votes occur when a bank, broker or other nominee returns a proxy but does not have authority to vote on a particular proposal.
Selected Historical Financial Data of Cimarex
The following table shows selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, together with similar information for each of the two preceding fiscal years ended September 30, and the three months ended December 31, 2001.
On September 30, 2002, Cimarex acquired 100 percent of the common stock of Key Production Company in a tax-free exchange of stock accounted for as a purchase business combination. Also on September 30, 2002, Cimarex changed its fiscal year from September 30 to December 31. Results of Key are included in the operating results only for the period subsequent to the acquisition on September 30, 2002. This information should be read in connection with and is qualified in its entirety by Cimarex's consolidated financial statements, the accompanying notes and management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in Cimarex's reports on file with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9.
| |
As of and For the Years Ended |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Three Months Ended December 31, 2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| |
December 31, |
September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||
| |
(In thousands, except per share and proved reserve amounts) |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Operating results: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 674,929 | $ | 454,212 | $ | 209,644 | $ | 316,778 | $ | 237,021 | $ | 39,596 | ||||||||
| Net income | 153,592 | 94,633 | 39,819 | 35,253 | 57,386 | 4,479 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 3.70 | 2.28 | 1.32 | 1.33 | 2.16 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 3.59 | 2.22 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 2.16 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per share | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Balance sheet data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 1,105,446 | 805,508 | 674,286 | 246,212 | 286,090 | 251,966 | ||||||||||||||
| Total debt | — | — | 32,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Stockholders' equity | 700,712 | 534,740 | 444,880 | 166,795 | 192,972 | 175,082 | ||||||||||||||
| Other financial data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and gas sales | 472,389 | 324,119 | 157,299 | 222,136 | 158,502 | 26,857 | ||||||||||||||
| Oil and gas capital expenditures | 297,091 | 162,627 | 368,503 | 104,975 | 73,821 | 14,425 | ||||||||||||||
| Proved Reserves: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Gas (MMcf) | 364,641 | 337,344 | 318,627 | 216,337 | 262,498 | 212,326 | ||||||||||||||
| Oil (MBbls) | 14,063 | 14,137 | 15,025 | 5,932 | 6,305 | 5,304 | ||||||||||||||
| Total equivalent (MMcfe) | 449,020 | 422,167 | 408,779 | 251,927 | 300,329 | 244,150 | ||||||||||||||
I-22
Selected Historical Financial Data of Magnum Hunter
Set forth below is selected consolidated financial data of Magnum Hunter as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2004. The annual information is derived from audited financial statements of Magnum Hunter for the years 2000 through 2004. This information should be read together with Magnum Hunter's consolidated financial statements, the accompanying notes and management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Chapter IV—Magnum Hunter Business and Financial Information" beginning on page IV-1.
| |
As of and For the Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||
| |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement Data: | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 493,726 | $ | 325,014 | $ | 265,869 | $ | 152,806 | $ | 127,510 | |||||||
| Operating costs and expenses(a) | (287,793 | ) | (232,316 | ) | (197,000 | ) | (104,755 | ) | (77,181 | ) | |||||||
| Operating profit | 205,933 | 92,698 | 68,869 | 48,051 | 50,329 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for impairment of investment(b) | — | — | (621 | ) | (7,123 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt(c) | (12,250 | ) | (6,716 | ) | (1,000 | ) | (490 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle, net of tax(d) | — | 399 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | 103,573 | 26,117 | 15,522 | 13,516 | 22,260 | ||||||||||||
| Dividends applicable to preferred shares(e) | — | — | — | — | (9,708 | ) | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) applicable to common shares | $ | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | $ | 13,516 | $ | 12,552 | |||||||
| Income (loss) per common share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic(e) | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||
| Diluted(e) | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.51 | |||||||
| Income (loss) per common share after cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic(e) | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||
| Diluted(e) | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.51 | |||||||
| Other Data: | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets | $ | 22,902 | $ | 17,123 | $ | 95,988 | $ | 1,124 | $ | 43,770 | |||||||
| Capital expenditures(f) | $ | 540,010 | $ | 175,535 | $ | 141,046 | $ | 204,370 | $ | 60,830 | |||||||
- (a)
- Includes
in 2001 a provision for loss of $3.2 million related to the Enron bankruptcy.
- (b)
- Includes
in 2002 and 2001 a provision for $621 thousand and $2.1 million, respectively, for the impairment of available-for-sale equity
securities deemed by management to have suffered an other than temporary impairment. The impairment was determined using a quoted market price at December 31, 2001 of $0.86 per share. We had
previously reported losses in accumulated other comprehensive income of $507 thousand ($466 thousand net of income tax benefit) through December 31, 2001. Also included in 2001
was an impairment provision of $5.0 million due to the bankruptcy of a privately held company in which Magnum Hunter owned a minority interest and had invested $4.5 million in equity
securities and $453 thousand in secured loans.
- (c)
- Includes
in 2004 the cost of retirement of $105 million in principal of Magnum Hunter's 9.6% Senior Notes due March 15, 2012. Includes in 2003 the cost of retirement of
$129.5 million in principal of Magnum Hunter's 10% senior notes due June 1, 2007. Includes in 2002 the costs associated with the amendment of Magnum Hunter's credit facility in
connection with the Prize merger. Includes in 2001 the cost of retirement of $10.5 million of Magnum Hunter's 10% senior notes.
- (d)
- Includes
in 2003 the cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle due to the adoption of SFAS No. 143 relating to asset retirement obligations. The
cumulative effect was a gain of $399 thousand, net of income tax expense of $244 thousand.
- (e)
- Includes the effect in the year 2000 of the payment of a $5.5 million fee upon redemption of $25.0 million (liquidation value) of Magnum Hunter's 1999 Series A 8% convertible preferred stock. The fee was treated as a dividend, reducing income per common share, basic and diluted, by $0.26 per share and $0.17 per share, respectively, for the year 2000.
I-23
- (f)
- Capital expenditures include cash expended for acquisitions plus normal additions to oil and natural gas properties and other fixed assets. It does not include the cost of property acquired through the issuance of common stock and does not include cash adjustments for liabilities assumed in the New Mexico property acquisition.
| |
As of December 31, |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||
| |
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 1,496,912 | $ | 1,095,883 | $ | 1,001,609 | $ | 419,837 | $ | 260,532 | |||||
| Total assets | 1,702,501 | 1,265,892 | 1,169,656 | 454,385 | 315,612 | ||||||||||
| Total debt(a) | 645,500 | 597,500 | 570,837 | 288,583 | 191,139 | ||||||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | $ | 679,813 | $ | 389,676 | $ | 350,196 | $ | 117,974 | $ | 93,416 | |||||
- (a)
- Consists of current notes payable and long-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt, and excluding production payment liabilities of zero, $12 thousand, $114 thousand, $203 thousand, and $359 thousand as of December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2001, none of the debt was non-recourse to Magnum Hunter. As of December 31, 2002 and 2000, $7.0 million and $20.6 million, respectively, of the debt was non-recourse to Magnum Hunter.
| |
As of and For the Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||
| |
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||
| Cash Flow Data: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities | $ | 300,610 | $ | 162,638 | $ | 83,403 | $ | 104,074 | $ | 49,466 | ||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | (513,939 | ) | (159,675 | ) | (89,420 | ) | (203,989 | ) | (20,008 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | $ | 214,978 | $ | 12,661 | $ | 6,331 | $ | 102,661 | $ | (31,014 | ) | |||||
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter are providing the following selected unaudited pro forma financial information to present a summary of the results of operations and financial position of the combined company giving effect to the merger as though Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's businesses had been combined at the dates indicated and for the periods shown.
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that each company's management believes are reasonable. The selected unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is based on the estimates and assumptions set forth below and in the notes accompanying the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. The companies may have performed differently had they always been combined. Stockholders should not rely on this information as being indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results of the combined company after the merger. The selected unaudited pro forma financial information:
- (i)
- has
been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and accompanying notes included in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus as described under "—Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements" beginning on page I-142; and
- (ii)
- should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter incorporated by reference and included, respectively, in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9 and "Chapter IV—Magnum Hunter Business and Financial Information" beginning on page IV-1.
I-24
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared based on the following assumptions:
- •
- Cimarex
issued an aggregate of approximately 36.3 million shares of Cimarex common stock (at an exchange ratio of 0.415 shares of Cimarex common stock for each share
of Magnum Hunter common stock) for all the outstanding shares of common stock of Magnum Hunter (excluding 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter), and
assumed Magnum Hunter's debt.
- •
- The
unaudited pro forma balance sheet has been prepared as if the merger occurred on December 31, 2004. The unaudited pro forma statements of operations have been
prepared as if the merger occurred on January 1, 2004.
- •
- The
merger was accounted for as a purchase of Magnum Hunter by Cimarex.
- •
- Any
potential cost savings have not been reflected as an adjustment to the historical data. These cost savings, if any, would result from the consolidation of certain
offices and the elimination of duplicate corporate and field-level staff and expenses.
- •
- During
February and March 2005, approximately 6.8 million warrants were exercised at $15 per share for proceeds of approximately $102.3 million for the
6.8 million common shares issued. The remaining warrants that were not exercised expired on March 21, 2005. Of the proceeds received by Magnum Hunter in connection with the
February and March 2005 warrant exercises, approximately $100.0 million was used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Magnum Hunter credit facility and approximately
$2.3 million was used for capital expenditures by Magnum Hunter. The pro forma balance sheet at December 31, 2004 does not give effect to the subsequent exercise of the warrants or the
repayment of outstanding indebtedness under the Magnum Hunter credit facility.
- •
- See "—The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Indenture Obligations and Notes" on page I-132. Any potential buyback or conversion of these notes has not been reflected as an adjustment in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. For a 10% increase above Magnum Hunter's share price of $12.19, approximately 363,000 Cimarex shares could potentially be issued related to Magnum Hunter's $125 million floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023, if those notes were converted.
| |
As of December 31, 2004 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of Dollars) |
||
| Pro Forma Balance Sheet Data | |||
| Total assets | $ | 3,857.1 | |
| Long-term debt | 696.0 | ||
| Stockholders' equity | 2,067.7 | ||
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of dollars, except per share data) |
|||
| Pro Forma Statement of Operations Data | ||||
| Revenues | $ | 1,171.5 | ||
| Net income | 203.7 | |||
| Net income per share: | ||||
| Basic | $ | 2.62 | ||
| Diluted | $ | 2.58 | ||
I-25
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION
The following tables set forth historical per share information of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and unaudited pro forma combined per share information after giving effect to the merger.
The unaudited pro forma combined per share information does not purport to represent what the results of operations or financial position of Cimarex, Magnum Hunter or the combined company would actually have been had the merger occurred at the beginning of the period shown, or to project Cimarex's, Magnum Hunter's or the combined company's results of operations or financial position for any future period or date. This pro forma information is derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and accompanying notes included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as presented under "—Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements" beginning on page I-142.
The historical per share information is derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the financial statements for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, which are incorporated by reference and included, respectively, in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9 and "Chapter IV—Magnum Hunter Business and Financial Information" beginning on page IV-1.
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cimarex Historical Per Share Data: | |||||
| Income from continuing operations | |||||
| Basic(a) | $ | 3.70 | |||
| Diluted(b) | $ | 3.59 | |||
| Cash dividends | $ | — | |||
| Book value(c) | $ | 16.79 | |||
| Magnum Hunter Historical Per Share Data: | |||||
| Income from continuing operations | |||||
| Basic(a) | $ | 1.35 | |||
| Diluted(b) | $ | 1.31 | |||
| Cash dividends | $ | — | |||
| Book value (c) | $ | 7.78 | |||
| Pro Forma Combined Company Per Share Data: | |||||
| Income from continuing operations | |||||
| Basic(d) | $ | 2.62 | |||
| Diluted(d) | $ | 2.58 | |||
| Cash dividends | $ | — | |||
| Book value(e) | $ | 26.51 | |||
| Pro Forma Combined Magnum Hunter Equivalent Per Share Data:(f) | |||||
| Income from continuing operations | |||||
| Basic | $ | 1.09 | |||
| Diluted | $ | 1.07 | |||
| Cash dividends | $ | — | |||
| Book value | $ | 11.00 | |||
- (a)
- Based
on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for Cimarex or Magnum Hunter for such period.
- (b)
- Based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the potential dilution that would occur if interests in securities (options, restricted stock units, warrants, and
I-26
convertible debentures) were exercised and converted into common stock of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter for such period.
- (c)
- Computed
by dividing stockholders' equity by the number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of such period.
- (d)
- Based
on the pro forma net income from the "—Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements" beginning on page I-142 which gives effect to the merger
under the purchase method of accounting.
- (e)
- Computed
by dividing pro forma stockholders' equity by the number of outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock at the end of such period, adjusted to include the estimated number of
shares of Cimarex common stock to be issued in the merger.
- (f)
- Based on the assumed conversion of each share of Magnum Hunter common stock into 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock in the merger. The Pro Forma Combined Magnum Hunter Equivalent Per Share Data is computed by multiplying the Pro Forma Combined Company Per Share Data by the fixed exchange ratio of 0.415.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Cimarex's $0.01 par value common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol "XEC." Magnum Hunter's $0.002 par value common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol "MHR." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter common stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Tape. For current price information, you should consult publicly available sources.
Cimarex Common Stock
| |
High |
Low |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 42.57 | $ | 34.46 | ||
| 2004 | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 29.75 | $ | 24.05 | ||
| Second Quarter | $ | 30.25 | $ | 26.24 | ||
| Third Quarter | $ | 35.25 | $ | 29.20 | ||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 41.45 | $ | 33.60 | ||
| 2003 | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 20.42 | $ | 17.07 | ||
| Second Quarter | $ | 24.40 | $ | 18.80 | ||
| Third Quarter | $ | 23.70 | $ | 19.24 | ||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 28.14 | $ | 19.50 | ||
I-27
Magnum Hunter Common Stock
| |
High |
Low |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 17.55 | $ | 11.55 | ||
| 2004 | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 10.26 | $ | 8.12 | ||
| Second Quarter | $ | 11.40 | $ | 9.65 | ||
| Third Quarter | $ | 11.58 | $ | 9.80 | ||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 13.82 | $ | 11.36 | ||
| 2003 | ||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 6.20 | $ | 5.25 | ||
| Second Quarter | $ | 8.39 | $ | 5.32 | ||
| Third Quarter | $ | 8.25 | $ | 6.85 | ||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 9.90 | $ | 7.98 | ||
Neither Cimarex nor Magnum Hunter has ever paid any cash dividends to its common stockholders. Magnum Hunter's credit facilities place substantial limitations on its ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock.
At this time, Cimarex does not intend to pay a common stock dividend to stockholders following the merger—instead, it intends to retain earnings for its exploration and development activities.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter common stock on November 22, 2004, the last full trading day before Cimarex and Magnum Hunter entered into an amended confidentiality agreement; January 25, 2005, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger; and April 28, 2005, the most recent full trading day practicable before the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
| Cimarex Common Stock |
Magnum Hunter Common Stock |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
High |
Low |
|
High |
Low |
|||||||||
| November 22, 2004 | $ | 38.70 | $ | 37.88 | November 22, 2004 | $ | 13.55 | $ | 13.35 | |||||
| January 25, 2005 | $ | 40.21 | $ | 39.65 | January 25, 2005 | $ | 13.40 | $ | 13.02 | |||||
| April 28, 2005 | $ | 35.87 | $ | 34.94 | April 28, 2005 | $ | 14.60 | $ | 14.34 | |||||
Holders of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter common stock should obtain current market quotations for Cimarex and Magnum Hunter common stock. The market price of Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock could vary at any time before the merger.
I-28
Stockholders of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter voting in favor of the issuance of shares in connection with the merger and in favor of the merger agreement, respectively, will be choosing to combine the business of Magnum Hunter with that of Cimarex and, in the case of stockholders of Magnum Hunter, to invest in the combined company's common stock. In addition to the matters addressed in "—Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" on page I-9, the information included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents attached to or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, you should carefully consider the following risks related to the merger and the combined company's business in determining whether to vote in favor of the proposals described herein.
Because the exchange ratio is fixed, the value of Cimarex common stock issued to the Magnum Hunter stockholders will depend on the market price of Cimarex common stock when the merger is completed.
Magnum Hunter stockholders will receive a fixed number of shares of common stock of Cimarex, rather than a number of shares with a particular fixed value. The market values of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter common stock at the time of the merger may vary significantly from their prices on the date the merger agreement was executed, the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the date on which Cimarex or Magnum Hunter stockholders vote on the merger. Because the exchange ratio will not be adjusted to reflect any changes in the market value of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter common stock, the market value of the Cimarex common stock issued in the merger and the Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered in the merger may be higher or lower than the values of those shares on those earlier dates. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors that are beyond the control of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, including changes in our businesses, operations and prospects, regulatory considerations, market assessments of the likelihood that the merger will be completed, the timing of the completion of the merger, and general and oil and gas specific market and economic conditions. Magnum Hunter is not permitted to "walk away" from the merger or resolicit the vote of its stockholders solely because of changes in the market price of either party's common stock. Although Cimarex has entered into a voting agreement with two Magnum Hunter stockholders who together owned approximately 4.1% of Magnum Hunter's common stock as of March 31, 2005, Magnum Hunter's other stockholders who are not parties to voting agreements with Cimarex could vote against the transaction.
The integration of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter following the merger will present significant challenges.
Upon consummation of the merger, the integration of the operations of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and the consolidation of those operations in Cimarex will require the dedication of management resources, which will temporarily distract attention from the day-to-day businesses of the combined company. The difficulties of assimilation may be increased by the necessity of coordinating geographically separated organizations, integrating operations and systems and personnel with disparate business backgrounds and combining different corporate cultures. The process of combining the organizations may cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of any or all of the companies' businesses, which could have an adverse effect on the revenues and operating results of the combined company, at least in the near term. The failure to successfully integrate Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, to retain key personnel and to successfully manage the challenges presented by the integration process may result in Cimarex and Magnum Hunter not achieving the anticipated potential benefits of the merger. If the combined company fails to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger, holders of its common stock may receive lower returns than they expect.
I-29
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter will incur merger-related charges.
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter estimate that, as a result of the merger, the combined company will incur severance expenses in an aggregate amount of approximately $13 million. In addition, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter expect to incur other merger-related expenses of approximately $18.5 million in total, consisting of investment banking, legal and accounting fees and financial printing and other related charges. These amounts are preliminary estimates and the actual amounts may be higher or lower. Moreover, the combined company is likely to incur additional expenses in future periods in connection with the integration of Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's businesses.
Directors and executive officers of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may have interests in the merger that are different from those of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter stockholders generally.
Certain executive officers and directors of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter stockholders generally. For example:
- •
- the
removal of Magnum Hunter's directors as of the effective time of the merger will entitle the outside directors of Magnum Hunter to additional compensation as set forth
in Magnum Hunter's Outside Director Policy;
- •
- certain
executives of Magnum Hunter will have "good reason" to voluntarily terminate their employment in accordance with their employment agreements as a result of the
merger, which termination will entitle those executives to lump sum termination payments, benefits continuation and other benefits;
- •
- certain
directors and executive officers of Magnum Hunter will have the vesting of their stock options and payment of deferred bonuses accelerated in full;
- •
- certain
directors of Cimarex will be entitled to accelerated vesting of options, an extension of time to exercise options following termination of service and accelerated
vesting and payout of stock units, and would be entitled to accelerated vesting and payout under Cimarex's Directors Deferred Compensation Plan if the plan is amended following the merger, although
Cimarex has obtained the agreement of each of these directors to waive these benefits other than the accelerated option vesting; and
- •
- certain officers of Cimarex will be entitled to accelerated vesting of options, accelerated vesting and payout of stock units and restricted stock and accelerated vesting and payout under Cimarex's Supplemental Savings Plan, although Cimarex has obtained the agreement of most of these officers to waive these benefits.
You should consider these interests in connection with your vote on the merger or the share issuance, as applicable, including whether these interests may have influenced these directors and executive officers to recommend or support the merger.
Failure to retain key employees could adversely affect Cimarex after the merger.
The performance of Magnum Hunter as a subsidiary of Cimarex after the merger could be adversely affected if the combined company cannot retain selected key employees of Magnum Hunter. The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees could adversely affect the combined company's future operating results because of their experience and knowledge of Magnum Hunter's business. Although Cimarex has agreed to offer to employ all employees of Magnum Hunter (other than the 17 management employees who have employment agreements and contractual severance arrangements) for at least six months following the merger, it is not yet known how many, or which, employees will accept this offer. In addition, current and prospective employees of Cimarex and
I-30
Magnum Hunter may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the companies until after the merger is completed. This may adversely affect the ability of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter to attract and retain key personnel.
Cimarex stockholders will be diluted by the merger.
The merger will dilute the ownership position of the current stockholders of Cimarex. Based on the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2005, Cimarex would issue approximately 39.5 million shares of Cimarex common stock to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger (excluding 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter). As a result, Cimarex stockholders and Magnum Hunter stockholders would hold 51.4% and 48.6%, respectively, of the combined company's common stock outstanding immediately after the completion of the merger.
If Cimarex or Magnum Hunter fails to obtain all required contractual consents and approvals, third parties may terminate or alter existing contracts.
Cimarex's obligation to complete the merger is conditioned, among other things, upon receipt of all material consents and approvals that Magnum Hunter is required to obtain in connection with the merger, except where the failure to receive the consents and approvals would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Magnum Hunter. Some agreements between Magnum Hunter and its suppliers, customers or other business partners may require the consent or approval of these other parties in connection with the merger. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to obtain any necessary consents and approvals. However, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may not be able to obtain all the necessary consents and approvals. If any consents and approvals are not obtained and Cimarex elects to waive the closing condition relating to receipt of material consents, the absence of the consents or approvals could have a material adverse effect on the combined company's business after the merger.
If the merger is completed, the date that you will receive your merger consideration is uncertain.
The date that you will receive your merger consideration depends on the completion date of the merger, which is uncertain. While we currently expect to complete the merger during the second quarter of 2005, the closing date of the merger might be later than expected due to unforeseen events.
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may be unable to obtain the regulatory approvals required to complete the merger or, in order to do so, the combined company may be required to comply with material restrictions or conditions.
The merger is subject to review by the United States Department of Justice and United States Federal Trade Commission under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Improvements Act of 1976, referred to as the HSR Act. Under this statute, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter are required to make pre-merger notification filings and await the expiration or early termination of statutory waiting periods before completing the merger. On February 16, 2005, each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter made its initial HSR Act filing, and the waiting period expired on March 17, 2005.
Even though the statutory waiting periods have expired, and even after completion of the merger, governmental authorities could seek to block or challenge the merger as they deem necessary or desirable in the public interest. In addition, in some jurisdictions, a competitor, customer or other third party could initiate a private action under the antitrust laws challenging or seeking to enjoin the merger, before or after it is completed. Cimarex, Magnum Hunter or the combined company may not prevail, or may incur significant costs, in defending or settling any action under the antitrust laws.
I-31
Risks Relating to the Combined Company's Business Following the Merger
Low oil and gas prices could adversely affect the combined company's financial results and future rate of growth in proved reserves and production.
The combined company's revenues and results of operations will be highly dependent on oil and gas prices. The prices we receive for our production are based on prevailing market conditions and are influenced by many factors that are beyond our control. Historically, oil and gas prices have fluctuated widely, and petroleum prices could continue to be volatile in the future. In recent years, oil prices have responded to changes in supply and demand stemming from actions taken by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, worldwide economic conditions, growing transportation and power generation needs, and other events. Factors affecting gas prices have included declining domestic supplies; the level and price of natural gas imports into the U.S.; weather conditions; and the price and level of alternative sources of energy such as nuclear power, hydroelectric power, coal, and other petroleum products.
The combined company's proved oil and gas reserves and production volumes will decrease in quantity unless it successfully replaces the reserves it produces with new discoveries or acquisitions. For the foreseeable future, we expect to make substantial capital investments for the exploration and development of new oil and gas reserves to replace the reserves we produce and to increase our total proved reserves. Historically, Cimarex has paid for these types of capital expenditures with cash flow provided by production operations. Because low oil and gas prices would negatively affect the amount of cash flow available to fund these capital investments, they could also affect the combined company's future rate of reserve and production growth. Low prices may also reduce the amount of oil and gas that the combined company can economically produce and may cause it to curtail, delay or defer certain exploration and development projects. Moreover, the combined company's ability to borrow under its bank credit facility and to raise additional debt or equity capital to fund acquisitions would also be impacted.
Failure of the combined company's exploration and development program to find commercial quantities of new oil and gas reserves could negatively affect its financial results and future rate of growth.
In order to replace the reserves depleted by production and to maintain or grow the combined company's total proved reserves and overall production levels, we must locate and develop new oil and gas reserves or acquire producing properties from others. While it may from time to time seek to acquire proved reserves, Cimarex's main business strategy is to grow through drilling and Cimarex expects to continue this strategy following the merger. Without successful exploration and development, the combined company's reserves, production and revenues could decline rapidly, which would negatively impact its results of operations and reduce its ability to raise capital.
Exploration and development involves numerous risks, including the risk that no commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs will be discovered. Exploration and development can also be unprofitable, not only from dry wells, but from productive wells that do not produce sufficient reserves to return a profit.
We often are uncertain as to the future cost or timing of drilling, completing and producing wells. The combined company's drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of several factors, including unforeseen poor drilling conditions, title problems, unexpected pressure or irregularities in formations, equipment failures, accidents, adverse weather conditions, compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements, and the cost of, or shortages or delays in the availability of, drilling rigs and related equipment.
I-32
The combined company's proved reserve estimates may be inaccurate and future net cash flows are uncertain.
Estimates of proved oil and gas reserves and their associated future net cash flow necessarily depend on a number of variables and assumptions, including many factors beyond our control. Among others, changes in any of the following factors may cause estimates to vary considerably from actual results:
- •
- production
rates, reservoir pressure, and other subsurface information;
- •
- future
oil and gas prices;
- •
- assumed
effects of governmental regulation;
- •
- future
operating costs;
- •
- future
property, severance, excise and other taxes incidental to oil and gas operations;
- •
- capital
expenditures;
- •
- workover
and remedial costs; and
- •
- federal and state income taxes.
Estimates of proved reserves and future net cash flow prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers at different times may vary substantially. Cimarex's proved oil and gas reserve estimates are prepared by Cimarex engineers in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC. Ryder Scott Company, L.P., independent petroleum engineers, reviewed Cimarex's reserve estimates for properties that comprised 80 percent of the discounted future net cash flows before income taxes, using a 10 percent discount rate, as of December 31, 2004. Magnum Hunter's estimated reserve evaluations and related calculations are prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton and Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., each independent petroleum engineering consultants.
You should not construe the net present values referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the current market value of Cimarex's, Magnum Hunter's or the combined company's estimated proved reserves. In accordance with SEC guidelines, the estimated discounted net cash flow from proved reserves is based on prices and costs as of the date of the estimate, whereas actual future prices and costs may be materially different. A number of companies in the oil and gas industry have recently written down their reserve estimates following internal reviews or review by the SEC. Write-downs of reserve estimates included in Cimarex's, Magnum Hunter's or the combined company's reserve reports, or future performance that deviates significantly from those reports, could have a material adverse effect on the combined company's stock price and its financial position and results of operations.
The marketability of the combined company's production will depend in part upon the availability, proximity and capacity of pipelines and processing facilities.
The combined company will deliver some of its gas through pipelines that it does not own. The marketability of the combined company's production will depend in part upon the availability, proximity and capacity of these pipelines as well as gathering systems and processing facilities. These facilities may not always be available to the combined company in the future. The lack of availability of these facilities for an extended period of time could negatively affect revenues.
Competition in our industry is intense and many of the combined company's competitors have greater financial and technological resources.
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter operate, and the combined company will operate, in the competitive area of oil and gas exploration and production. Many of our competitors are large, well-established
I-33
companies that have larger operating staffs and greater capital resources than the combined company. These companies may be able to pay more for exploratory prospects and productive oil and gas properties and may be able to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than the combined company's financial or human resources permit.
The combined company will be subject to complex laws and regulations that can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.
Exploration, development, production and sale of oil and gas are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations, including complex environmental laws. Future laws or regulations, any adverse changes in the interpretation of existing laws and regulation, inability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals, or a failure to comply with existing legal requirements may harm the combined company's business, results of operations and financial condition. The combined company may be required to make large expenditures to comply with environmental and other governmental regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the suspension or termination of operations and subject the combined company to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Matters subject to regulation include discharge permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds, spacing of wells, unitization and pooling of properties, environmental protection, and taxation. Cimarex's, Magnum Hunter's and the combined company's operations create the risk of environmental liabilities to the government or third parties for any unlawful discharge of oil, gas or other pollutants into the air, soil or water. In the event of environmental violations, we may be charged with remedial costs. Laws and regulations protecting the environment have become more stringent in recent years, and may, in some circumstances, result in liability for environmental damage regardless of negligence or fault. In addition, pollution and similar environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. These liabilities and costs could have a material adverse effect on the combined company's financial condition and results of operations.
The combined company's limited ability to influence operations and associated costs on properties not operated by it could result in economic losses that are partially beyond our control.
Other companies will operate a portion of the combined company's net production. In 2004, other companies operated approximately 26% of Cimarex's net production and approximately 46% of Magnum Hunter's net production. The combined company's success in properties operated by others will depend upon a number of factors outside of our control, including timing and amount of capital expenditures, the operator's expertise and financial resources, approval of other participants in drilling wells, selection of technology and maintenance of safety and environmental standards. The combined company's dependence on the operator and other working interest owners for these projects could prevent the realization of the combined company's targeted returns on capital in drilling or acquisition activities.
The combined company will conduct waterflood projects and other secondary recovery operations.
Secondary recovery operations involve certain risks, especially the use of water flooding techniques. Magnum Hunter's inventory of development prospects includes waterflood projects. With respect to Magnum Hunter's properties located in the Permian Basin, Magnum Hunter has identified significant potential expenditures related to further developing existing waterfloods, which will likely be incurred by the combined company following the merger. Waterflooding involves significant capital expenditures and uncertainty as to the total amount of recoverable secondary reserves. In waterflood operations, there is generally a delay between the initiation of water injection into a formation containing hydrocarbons and any increase in production. The operating cost per unit of production of waterflood projects is generally higher during the initial phases of these projects due to the purchase of injection water and related production enhancement costs. Costs are also higher during the later stages of the
I-34
life of the project as production declines. The degree of success, if any, of any secondary recovery program depends on a large number of factors, including the amount of primary production, the porosity and permeability of the formation, the technique used, the location of injector wells and the spacing of both producing and injector wells.
The combined company will attempt to economically hedge its oil and gas production.
Periodically, Magnum Hunter has entered into derivative transactions to reduce the effects of fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices on its future cash flows. At February 14, 2005, Magnum Hunter had approximately 43% of its natural gas production and approximately 17% of its crude oil production hedged through December 31, 2005. In addition, at February 14, 2005, Magnum Hunter had approximately 11% of its natural gas production and approximately 8% of its crude oil production hedged for calendar year 2006. The combined company may succeed to derivative instruments with terms expiring after the closing of the merger. Derivative instruments, while intended to reduce sensitivity to changes in market prices of oil and gas, are subject to a number of risks including instances in which the combined company or the counterparties to its derivative contracts fail to perform. Additionally, the fixed price sales and derivative contracts limit the benefits the combined company will realize if actual prices rise above the contract prices. Most of Magnum Hunter's derivative contracts are in the form of collars, which limit the benefit Magnum Hunter or the combined company would otherwise receive if actual prices exceed the upper end of the collars.
The combined company's business will involve many operating risks that may result in substantial losses for which insurance may be unavailable or inadequate.
The combined company's operations will be subject to hazards and risks inherent in drilling for oil and gas, such as fires, natural disasters, explosions, formations with abnormal pressures, casing collapses, uncontrollable flows of underground gas, blowouts, surface cratering, pipeline ruptures or cement failures, and environmental hazards such as natural gas leaks, oil spills and discharges of toxic gases. Any of these risks can cause substantial losses resulting from injury or loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution and other environmental damages, regulatory investigations and penalties, suspension of operations and repair and remediation costs. In addition, the combined company's liability for environmental hazards may include conditions created by the previous owners of properties that the combined company purchases or leases.
Each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter currently maintains, and following the merger the combined company will maintain, insurance coverage against some, but not all, potential losses. We do not believe that insurance coverage for all environmental damages that could occur is available at a reasonable cost. Losses could occur for uninsurable or uninsured risks, or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance could harm the combined company's financial condition and results of operations.
Exploratory drilling is an uncertain process with many risks.
Exploratory drilling involves numerous risks, including the risk that the combined company will not find any commercially productive natural gas or oil reservoirs. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain, and a number of factors can delay or prevent drilling operations, including:
- •
- unexpected
drilling conditions;
- •
- pressure
or irregularities in formations;
- •
- equipment
failures or accidents;
- •
- adverse weather conditions;
I-35
- •
- compliance
with governmental requirements; and
- •
- shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs or in the delivery of equipment.
The combined company's future drilling activity may not be successful, and its overall drilling success rate, or its drilling success rate for activity within a particular area, may decline. Unsuccessful drilling activities could have a material effect on the combined company's results of operations and financial condition. Also, the combined company may not be able to obtain any options or lease rights in potential drilling locations that it identifies. Although we have identified numerous potential drilling locations, we cannot be sure that we will ever drill them or that we will produce natural gas or oil from them or any other potential drilling locations.
The combined company's acquisition activities may not be successful, which may hinder its replacement of reserves and adversely affect its results of operations.
Cimarex regularly evaluates opportunities and at times engages in bidding and negotiating for acquisitions, some of which are substantial, and expects to continue this activity following the merger. Under certain circumstances, the combined company may pursue acquisitions of businesses that complement or expand our current business and acquisition and development of new exploration prospects that complement or expand our prospect inventory. The combined company may not be successful in identifying or acquiring any material property interests, which could hinder it in replacing its reserves and adversely affect its financial results and rate of growth. Even if it does identify attractive opportunities, the combined company may not be able to complete the acquisition of the business or prospect on commercially acceptable terms. If it does complete an acquisition, the combined company must anticipate difficulties in integrating the acquired company's operations, systems, technology, management and other personnel. These difficulties may disrupt the combined company's ongoing operations, distract management and employees and increase expenses.
Competition for experienced, technical personnel may negatively impact the combined company's operations.
The combined company's exploratory and development drilling success will depend, in part, on its ability to attract and retain experienced professional personnel. The loss of any key executives or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the combined company's operations. The combined company's future profitability will depend, at least in part, on its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, particularly individuals with a strong background in geology, geophysics, engineering and operations.
Risks Relating to the Combined Company's Indebtedness Following the Merger
The combined company's debt may limit its financial flexibility.
On a pro forma basis, the combined company had total long-term debt of approximately $646 million as of December 31, 2004. This includes the $195 million of 9.6% senior notes due 2012 and $125 million of floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023 issued by Magnum Hunter, as well as borrowings under Magnum Hunter's credit facility and borrowings under Cimarex's credit facility (no amounts were outstanding under Cimarex's credit facility as of December 31, 2004). The combined company may incur additional debt from time to time in connection with the financing of operations, acquisitions, recapitalizations and refinancings. The level of the combined company's debt and the senior, as opposed to subordinated, status of the 9.6% senior notes and the convertible senior notes could have several important effects on future operations, including, among others:
- •
- a significant portion of the combined company's cash flow from operations will be applied to the payment of principal and interest on the debt and will not be available for other purposes;
I-36
- •
- credit-rating
agencies have changed with respect to Magnum Hunter, and may change in the future with respect to the combined company, their ratings of that entity's debt and
other obligations, which in turn impacts the costs, terms and conditions and availability of financing;
- •
- covenants
contained in the combined company's existing and future debt arrangements will require the combined company to meet financial tests that may affect its flexibility
in planning for and reacting to changes in its business, including possible acquisition opportunities;
- •
- the
combined company's ability to obtain additional financing for capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate and other purposes may be limited or burdened by
increased costs or more restrictive covenants;
- •
- the
combined company may be at a competitive disadvantage to similar companies that have less debt;
- •
- the
combined company's vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions may increase; and
- •
- the combined company may face limitations on its flexibility to plan for and react to changes in its business and the industries in which it operates.
The 9.6% senior notes cannot be redeemed until March 2007, and then only at a premium, and the convertible senior notes cannot be redeemed until December 2008. In addition, the convertible senior notes must be redeemed on specified dates at the option of the holders of those notes. These provisions further limit the combined company's financial flexibility because the notes cannot be refinanced before their applicable redemption dates, and any required redemption of the convertible senior notes may occur at a time that is financially disadvantageous to the combined company.
The merger will allow holders of Magnum Hunter's outstanding notes to sell those notes back to Magnum Hunter, which may require Magnum Hunter or the combined company to expend substantial amounts of cash.
A change of control, as defined under the indentures relating to Magnum Hunter's $195 million 9.6% senior notes due 2012 and $125 million floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023 entitles the holders to sell those notes to Magnum Hunter under the applicable indenture at a price equal to 101% and 100% of their principal amount, respectively, plus accrued interest. We call this right the put right. The merger qualifies as a change of control for purposes of these provisions. Notice of the merger must be delivered within 30 days following the closing of the merger. The put right may be exercised within 30-45 days following delivery of notice of the merger. If the holders of Magnum Hunter's notes exercise their rights under these provisions, Magnum Hunter or the combined company will be required to spend a significant amount of cash to satisfy these obligations. If all outstanding notes are sold back to Magnum Hunter, the total repurchase costs, as of December 31, 2004, would have been approximately $327.6 million. Cash that is required to meet Magnum Hunter's obligations under these provisions will not be available to Magnum Hunter or the combined company for other purposes.
Failure to fund continued capital expenditures could adversely affect results of the combined company.
The combined company will be required to expend capital necessary to replace its reserves and to maintain or increase production levels. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter expect that the combined company will continue to make capital expenditures for the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves. Historically, Cimarex has financed these expenditures primarily with cash flow from operations. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter believe that, after considering the amount of the combined company's debt (see "—Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements" on page I-142), the combined company will have sufficient cash flow from operations, available
I-37
drawings under its credit facilities and other debt financings to fund capital expenditures. However, if the combined company's cash flow from operations is not sufficient to satisfy its capital expenditure requirements, additional debt or equity financing or other sources of capital may not be available to meet these requirements. Should the industries in which the combined company operates experience price declines or other adverse market conditions, the combined company may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet its obligations and fund planned capital expenditures. If the combined company is not able to fund its capital expenditures, its interests in some of its properties may be reduced or forfeited and its future cash generation may be materially adversely affected as a result of the failure to find and develop reserves.
The indenture for Magnum Hunter's 9.6% senior notes imposes restrictions that will limit the combined company's discretion in operating its business and that could impair the combined company's ability to repay its obligations.
The indenture governing Magnum Hunter's $195 million 9.6% senior notes due 2012 imposes various restrictive covenants on Magnum Hunter. These restrictions will continue to apply to Magnum Hunter as the surviving corporation following the merger. In particular, these covenants will limit the combined company's ability to, among other things:
- •
- incur
additional debt;
- •
- make
restricted payments, including paying dividends on, redeeming or repurchasing capital stock;
- •
- make
investments or acquisitions;
- •
- grant
liens on assets;
- •
- sell
assets;
- •
- engage
in transactions with affiliates; and
- •
- merge, consolidate or transfer substantially all of its assets.
These restrictive covenants may limit the discretion of the combined company's management in operating its business and could impair the combined company's ability to repay its obligations. In addition, if Magnum Hunter fails to comply with these restrictive covenants, the holders of the notes could declare all principal and interest amounts then owing on the notes to be immediately due and payable. Upon any such acceleration of payment obligations on the notes, the combined company may not have or be able to obtain sufficient cash to meet the accelerated obligations. This could have serious consequences to the combined company's financial condition and could cause it to become bankrupt or insolvent.
Risks Relating to the Combined Company's Common Stock
The market price of the shares of Cimarex common stock and the results of operations of the combined company after the merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting Cimarex or Magnum Hunter currently.
The businesses of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter differ in some respects and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of the combined company's shares of common stock may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations and market prices of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter separately. For a discussion of the business of Cimarex and factors to consider in connection with that business, see the documents incorporated by reference in this document and referred to under "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9. For
I-38
a discussion of the business of Magnum Hunter and factors to consider in connection with that business, see "Chapter IV—Magnum Hunter Business and Financial Information" beginning on page IV-1.
The market value of Cimarex's common stock could decline if large amounts of its common stock are sold following the merger.
Following the merger, stockholders of Cimarex and former stockholders of Magnum Hunter will own interests in a combined company operating an expanded business with more assets and a different mix of liabilities. Current stockholders of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may not wish to continue to invest in the additional operations of the combined company, or for other reasons may wish to dispose of some or all of their interests in the combined company. If, following the merger, large amounts of Cimarex's common stock are sold, the price of its common stock could decline.
Cimarex has never paid cash dividends on its common stock.
Cimarex has not previously paid any cash dividends on its common stock and Cimarex does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its common stock following the merger. Cimarex intends to reinvest all available funds for the development and growth of its business. In addition, the indenture governing Magnum Hunter's 9.6% senior notes due 2012 restricts the payment of cash dividends by Magnum Hunter.
The combined company will have the ability to issue additional equity securities, which would lead to dilution of its issued and outstanding common stock.
The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities would result in dilution of then-existing stockholders' equity interests in the combined company. Cimarex's board of directors has the authority to issue, without stockholder approval, 15 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and has the ability to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of any such series. Any such series of preferred stock could contain dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences or other rights superior to the rights of holders of Cimarex's common stock. Cimarex currently has no shares of preferred stock outstanding, and Cimarex's board of directors has no present intention of issuing any preferred stock, but Cimarex's intentions may change in the future. In addition, Cimarex is authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 100 million shares of common stock, of which Cimarex and Magnum Hunter expect approximately 82.3 million shares will be outstanding immediately following the closing of the merger. At its annual meeting, Cimarex will ask its stockholders to approve an increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock to 200 million. Cimarex is also authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, securities convertible into shares of common stock or preferred stock.
The combined company will have outstanding convertible notes which are convertible into Cimarex common stock.
Magnum Hunter has issued $125 million of convertible senior notes that have a final maturity of 2023. The interest rate on the convertible senior notes is a floating interest rate based on three-month LIBOR, which as of December 31, 2004 was 2.49%. These notes will remain obligations of Magnum Hunter following the merger. The convertible notes will be convertible into a combination of cash and common stock of Cimarex upon the happening of certain events, including the merger. This means that holders of these notes will be able to convert the notes immediately following the merger. In general, upon conversion of a convertible note, the holder would receive cash equal to the principal amount of the convertible note and Cimarex common stock for the convertible note's conversion value in excess of the principal amount plus accrued interest. The number of shares of Cimarex common stock into which
I-39
the convertible notes are convertible will depend upon the conversion value in excess of the principal amount of the convertible notes and Cimarex's common stock price at the time of the conversion. Any such conversion will be dilutive to Cimarex's then-existing stockholders.
Cimarex's certificate of incorporation, bylaws and stockholder rights plan and Delaware law include provisions that could discourage an unsolicited corporate takeover and could prevent stockholders from realizing a premium on their investment.
The amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Cimarex provide for a classified board of directors with staggered terms, restrict the ability of stockholders to take action by written consent and prevent stockholders from calling a meeting of the stockholders. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the bylaws may make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove the combined company's management. These provisions may facilitate management entrenchment and may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Cimarex, even if the change in control might be beneficial to Cimarex stockholders.
Cimarex also has adopted a stockholder rights plan which may have anti-takeover effects. The stockholder rights plan is designed to protect Cimarex's stockholders in the event of unsolicited offers to acquire Cimarex and other coercive takeover tactics that, in the opinion of Cimarex's board of directors, could impair the board's ability to represent stockholder interests. The stockholder rights plan might render an unsolicited takeover more difficult or less likely to occur, even though such a takeover might offer Cimarex's stockholders the opportunity to sell their stock at a price above the prevailing market price and may be favored by Cimarex's stockholders.
Some of these provisions are not included in Magnum Hunter's current governing documents. In addition, Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware may limit the ability of an interested stockholder to engage in business combinations with the combined company. An interested stockholder is defined to include persons owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock without the approval of the board of directors of the combined company. Magnum Hunter is currently governed by the Nevada Revised Statutes, which contain limitations on interested stockholder business combinations which differ in some respects from those under Delaware law.
I-40
General
Cimarex is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company. Cimarex's principal areas of operations are located in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, and Louisiana.
At December 31, 2004, proved reserves totaled 449.0 Bcfe consisting of 364.6 Bcf of gas and 14.1 million barrels of oil. Of total proved reserves, 81 percent are gas and more than 99 percent are classified as proved developed. Cimarex operates the wells that account for 60 percent of its total proved reserves and production.
Approximately 41 percent of Cimarex's proved reserves are located in Oklahoma. Properties situated in Texas and Kansas comprised 25 percent and 19 percent of total proved reserves, respectively. Cimarex has active exploration and development programs underway in each of those states as well as in Louisiana, California, New Mexico and Mississippi.
Cimarex was formed in February 2002 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Helmerich & Payne, Inc., referred to as H&P. In July 2002, H&P contributed its oil and gas exploration and production assets and the common stock of its gas marketing subsidiary to Cimarex. On September 30, 2002, H&P distributed in the form of a dividend to H&P stockholders approximately 26.6 million shares of Cimarex common stock. As a result, Cimarex was spun off and became a stand-alone company. Also on September 30, 2002, Cimarex acquired Key Production Company, Inc., referred to as Key, in a stock-for-stock transaction whereby each of Key's 14.1 million outstanding common shares was exchanged for Cimarex common stock on a one-for-one basis. Key continues to conduct exploration and development activities as a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex.
Cimarex is comprised primarily of an exploration and production segment, but because it markets third party gas incidental to the sale of its own production, it also reports in its footnotes segment information for natural gas marketing. For a discussion of financial information about the two segments of Cimarex, see Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Cimarex's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has been incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Corporate headquarters are located at 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203-4518, telephone (303) 295-3995. Principal operations offices are at 15 East 5th Street, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, telephone (918) 585-1100. Cimarex's common stock is listed on the NYSE and trades under the symbol "XEC."
Business Approach
Cimarex's approach to the business is fundamentally driven by seeking to achieve consistent profitable growth in proved reserves and production by conducting a continually expanding drilling program. To implement this strategy, Cimarex seeks to:
- •
- Generate
its own drilling inventory by maintaining a highly qualified staff of geoscientists;
- •
- Maintain
a balanced portfolio of prospects that is underpinned by a predominant mixture (70-90 percent of total capital) of
low-to-moderate risk drilling prospects combined with a smaller proportion of higher risk/higher potential projects;
- •
- Mitigate
exploration risk by operating in multiple basins, which provides both geologic and geographic diversification to Cimarex's drilling program;
- •
- Maintain operational control of its drilling and production activities;
I-41
- •
- Closely
monitor the production performance of its existing properties and constantly evaluate the potential to increase production rates and enhance ultimate recoveries
through workovers, recompletions and operational efficiencies; and
- •
- Maintain financial flexibility and an appropriate capital structure.
To supplement its growth, Cimarex also evaluates the economic and strategic attractiveness of acquisition and merger opportunities, such as the acquisition of Magnum Hunter.
Exploration and Development
Exploration and development activities are focused in western Oklahoma and the upper Gulf Coast areas of Texas and south Louisiana. Cimarex also has smaller projects underway in Kansas, the Hardeman Basin of north Texas, the Permian Basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico, the Mississippi Salt Basin and the northern San Joaquin Valley of California.
For each of its core exploration areas, Cimarex has assembled integrated teams of landmen, geoscientists and petroleum engineers, who base their drilling decisions on detailed analysis of the potential reserves, expected costs, future net cash flow and risks associated with individual wells and programs. Through its centralized exploration management system, Cimarex measures actual results and provides continuous feedback about them to the respective exploration teams in order to help them improve and refine future investment decisions.
Cimarex participated in drilling 221 gross wells during 2004, with an overall success rate of 86 percent. On a net basis, 86 of 104 total wells drilled during 2004 were successful.
Cimarex's 2004 exploration and development expenditures totaled $296 million and resulted in 106.4 Bcfe of proved reserve additions. Of total expenditures, 63 percent ($188 million) was invested in projects located in the mid-continent area of the U.S., including Oklahoma, Kansas and north Texas. Approximately 27 percent, or $79 million, was directed toward prospects located along the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana.
General
Magnum Hunter was organized in 1989 as a Nevada corporation. Magnum Hunter is an independent energy company engaged in the exploration, exploitation and development, acquisition and operation of oil and gas properties with a geographic focus in the Mid-Continent Region, Permian Basin Region, Gulf Coast Region and the Gulf of Mexico. Magnum Hunter's management has implemented a business strategy that emphasizes the acquisition of long-lived proved reserves with significant exploitation and development opportunities where Magnum Hunter generally can control the operations of the properties.
As part of this strategy, from 1996 through 2003, Magnum Hunter acquired significant properties from Burlington Resources Inc., referred to as Burlington, Spirit Energy 76, a business unit of Union Oil Company of California, referred to as Spirit 76, Vastar Resources, Inc., referred to as Vastar, Mallon Resources Corporation, referred to as Mallon, and Tom Brown, Inc., a subsidiary of EnCana Corporation, referred to as Tom Brown. On March 15, 2002, Magnum Hunter acquired Prize Energy Corp., referred to as Prize, which was merged into one of Magnum Hunter's wholly owned subsidiaries. Prize was a publicly traded independent oil and gas company engaged primarily in the acquisition, enhancement and exploitation of producing oil and gas properties. Prize owned oil and gas properties principally located in three core operating areas, which were in the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico, the onshore Gulf Coast area of Texas and Louisiana and the Mid-Continent area of Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. Over 80% of Prize's oil and gas property base was located
I-42
in Texas. In addition to its focus on selected exploratory drilling prospects in the Gulf of Mexico as described below, Magnum Hunter concentrates its efforts on additional producing property acquisitions strategically located within its geographic area of operations. Magnum Hunter also develops its substantial inventory of drilling and workover opportunities located onshore.
Additionally, Magnum Hunter owns and operates five gas gathering systems covering over 480 miles and a 50% or greater ownership interest in four natural gas processing plants that are located adjacent to certain company-owned and operated producing properties within the states of Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas.
At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had an interest in 6,109 wells and had estimated proved reserves of 1.01 Tcfe. Approximately 73% of these reserves were proved developed reserves with a geographic breakdown as follows:
- •
- 25%
attributable to the Mid-Continent Region;
- •
- 59%
attributable to the Permian Basin Region;
- •
- 8%
attributable to the Gulf Coast Region; and
- •
- 8% attributable to the Gulf of Mexico.
At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter's proved reserves had an estimated reserve life of approximately 12.5 years and were 61% natural gas. Magnum Hunter serves as operator for approximately 78% of its properties, based on the gross number of wells in which it owns an interest.
Business Strategy
Magnum Hunter's overall strategy is to increase its reserves, production, cash flow and earnings, utilizing a properly balanced program of:
- •
- selective
exploration;
- •
- the
exploitation and development of acquired properties; and
- •
- strategic acquisitions of additional proved reserves.
The following are key elements of Magnum Hunter's strategy:
Exploration. Magnum Hunter participates in drilling Gulf of Mexico exploratory wells in an effort to add higher-output production to its reserve mix, especially during high commodity price periods. The continued use of 3-D seismic information as a tool in Magnum Hunter's exploratory drilling in the Gulf of Mexico will be significant. Over the last three years, Magnum Hunter has built a significant inventory of undrilled offshore lease blocks. Magnum Hunter has aligned itself with other active Gulf of Mexico industry partners who have similar philosophies and goals with respect to a "fast track" program of placing new production online. This typically involves drilling wells near existing infrastructure such as production platforms, facilities and pipelines. Magnum Hunter also maintains an active onshore exploration program primarily concentrated in West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico where it has various other operations in core areas. From time to time, Magnum Hunter participates in higher-risk new exploration projects generated by third parties in areas along the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana.
Exploitation and Development of Existing Properties. Magnum Hunter seeks to maximize the value of its existing properties through development activities including in-fill drilling, waterflooding and other enhanced recovery techniques. Typically, Magnum Hunter's exploitation projects do not have significant time limitations due to the existing mineral acreage being held by current production. By operating substantially all of its properties, Magnum Hunter's management is provided maximum flexibility with respect to the timing of capital expended to develop these opportunities.
I-43
Property Acquisitions. Although it currently has an extensive inventory of exploitation and development opportunities, Magnum Hunter has pursued, and may continue to pursue, strategic acquisitions which fit its objectives of increasing proved reserves in similar geographic regions that contain development or exploration potential combined with maintaining operating control. Magnum Hunter has pursued an acquisition strategy of acquiring long-lived assets where operating synergies may be obtained and production enhancements, either on the surface or below ground, may be achieved.
Management of Overhead and Operating Costs. Magnum Hunter emphasizes strict cost controls in all aspects of its business and seeks to operate its properties wherever possible, utilizing a minimum number of personnel. By operating the substantial majority of its properties, Magnum Hunter will generally be able to control direct operating and drilling costs as well as to manage the timing of development and exploration activities. This operating control also provides greater flexibility as to the timing requirements to fund new capital expenditures. By strictly controlling general and administrative expenses, Magnum Hunter's management strives to maximize its net operating margin.
I-44
The following discussion summarizes the material terms of the merger. Stockholders should read the merger agreement, as amended, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference, carefully and in its entirety.
Cimarex, its wholly owned subsidiary Merger Sub, and Magnum Hunter have entered into a merger agreement under which Cimarex will acquire Magnum Hunter through the merger of Merger Sub with and into Magnum Hunter. Magnum Hunter will be the surviving corporation in the merger and, after the effective time of the merger, will continue as a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex.
Each holder of Magnum Hunter common stock will be entitled to receive 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock held immediately before the effective time of the merger. This ratio is referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the exchange ratio. In the merger agreement, this ratio is called the conversion number.
At April 29, 2005, there were outstanding approximately 41,786,219 shares of Cimarex common stock. At April 15, 2005, there were outstanding approximately 95,187,747 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, 80,000 shares of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock and 1,000,000 shares of Magnum Hunter 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock. Immediately before the effective time of the merger, Magnum Hunter will cause its wholly owned subsidiary to convert all shares of 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock into 1,904,762 shares of common stock. Wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter also owned an additional 3,502,134 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock as of March 31, 2005. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter currently expect that Cimarex will issue up to approximately 39.5 million shares of Cimarex common stock to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger, excluding the 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter. After the effective time of the merger, current stockholders of Magnum Hunter will own 48.6%, in the aggregate, of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the combined company's common stock, and current stockholders of Cimarex will own 51.4%, in the aggregate, of all issued and outstanding shares of the combined company's common stock. These numbers do not give effect to shares that may be issued upon exercise of outstanding Cimarex or Magnum Hunter stock options or upon conversion of Magnum Hunter convertible senior notes.
WE CANNOT ASSURE YOU THAT THE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE OF CIMAREX'S COMMON STOCK AFTER THE MERGER WILL BE EQUAL TO THE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE OF CIMAREX OR MAGNUM HUNTER COMMON STOCK BEFORE THE MERGER, OR THAT THE MARKETABILITY OF CIMAREX'S COMMON STOCK WILL IMPROVE OR REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE MARKETABILITY OF CIMAREX OR MAGNUM HUNTER COMMON STOCK BEFORE THE MERGER.
On October 7, 2004, Magnum Hunter publicly announced that it had decided to investigate its strategic alternatives. The principal factor considered in reaching that decision was the potential for enhancement of stockholder value. Magnum Hunter's board and senior management shared the view that the company's stock market valuation was not entirely reflective of its underlying net asset value or future growth potential.
In order to accomplish a full and independent review of possible strategic alternatives available, Magnum Hunter's board of directors appointed a special committee comprised entirely of independent
I-45
directors. Mr. Jerry Box, an independent director, was elected chairman of both the board and the committee.
On October 11, 2004, the committee received proposals and formal presentations from five nationally recognized investment banking firms detailing their respective credentials and capabilities in providing the special committee financial advisory services with respect to the strategic alternatives review. On October 18, 2004, Magnum Hunter announced that Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch had been formally engaged as exclusive financial advisors to assist and advise the committee.
On October 14, 2004, the committee retained Thompson & Knight L.L.P. as its legal counsel.
In a meeting of Magnum Hunter's full board on November 10, 2004, the company's senior management made presentations regarding the company's current operations, assets and properties. Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch also discussed a range of strategic alternatives that Magnum Hunter could possibly consider.
Following the presentations and discussion among Magnum Hunter's full board, the senior management team, Thompson & Knight and the financial advisors, the board of directors voted unanimously to direct the financial advisors to contact entities that had expressed or might have strategic interest in either acquiring or combining with Magnum Hunter. The board also requested that the management team prepare a data room in which interested parties would have access to Magnum Hunter's financial, operating and legal records and information. The full board also voted unanimously to enlarge the special committee to include Magnum Hunter's board as a whole.
Following the November 10, 2004 board meeting, a total of 24 entities either contacted or were contacted by the financial advisors regarding expressions of interest in varying degrees in Magnum Hunter. Of the companies contacted, five, including Cimarex as noted below, executed confidentiality agreements.
On November 15, 2004, representatives of Magnum Hunter's financial advisors contacted Mr. Paul Korus, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Cimarex. The telephonic conversation included a general discussion regarding the potential merits of a transaction between Magnum Hunter and Cimarex, an update of recent business developments at Magnum Hunter and the overall process and timing of indications of interest and offers. There was no discussion of specific deal terms or valuation parameters. Shortly after that discussion, Mr. Korus advised Mr. F.H. Merelli, the chairman and CEO of Cimarex, about the process (including data room review) and potential deal structures.
On the morning of November 16, 2004, Merrill Lynch contacted Mr. Merelli to further discuss the potential merits of a business combination, clarify the process and attempt to ascertain Cimarex's willingness to execute a confidentiality agreement that would permit Cimarex to obtain information about Magnum Hunter.
Cimarex's management and board had previously discussed from time to time the potential strategic benefits of expanding Cimarex's operations in the Permian Basin through transactions with companies already operating in that area that have sizeable acreage with exploration potential. Cimarex management and its board had also previously discussed strategies for initiating operations in the Gulf of Mexico that would entail gaining access to existing production operations, un-drilled acreage blocks and a team of geoscientists experienced with offshore operations.
In light of those considerations, and in a response to a contact by Merrill Lynch on behalf of Magnum Hunter, Cimarex had executed a time-limited confidentiality agreement with Magnum Hunter dated November 3, 2003. Magnum Hunter, through Merrill Lynch, had contacted Cimarex, together with approximately 40 other companies, to determine their respective level of interest in a potential transaction with Magnum Hunter. Four companies other than Cimarex entered into a confidentiality agreement but none of these discussions resulted in a transaction.
I-46
From November 2003 through February 2004, Mr. Merelli and certain members of Magnum Hunter's management team, including Mr. Evans, remained in occasional contact and Cimarex conducted limited due diligence regarding Magnum Hunter. The nature of these discussions was generally related to Cimarex's management practices. Cimarex's interest at that time was limited to determining whether a combination should be pursued. Cimarex did not perform any valuation analysis, bring the possibility of a combination to its board's attention, engage financial or legal advisors, discuss any economic terms of a combination with Magnum Hunter or its advisors or submit a proposal to Magnum Hunter.
On November 23, 2004, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter executed an amendment to their November 2003 confidentiality agreement that extended the term for one year.
On November 23, 2004, Mr. Korus initiated a discussion with a representative of Petrie Parkman & Co. regarding Cimarex's interest in participating in the Magnum Hunter process and inquired about Petrie Parkman's availability to assist Cimarex as financial advisor.
In a letter dated November 29, 2004, Mr. Merelli formally advised Cimarex's board of management's interest in pursuing a potential opportunity with Magnum Hunter and its recommendation that Cimarex retain Petrie Parkman as its principal financial advisor. Also on November 29, Mr. Korus contacted Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Cimarex's regular legal counsel, regarding their availability to act as legal advisor.
On December 1, 2004, Cimarex engaged Petrie Parkman as its principal financial advisor, subject to board approval.
On December 7, 2004, Cimarex's board held a regularly scheduled meeting, at which Mr. Merelli described Cimarex's interest in Magnum Hunter. He specifically highlighted the large Permian Basin position that Magnum Hunter owned, its well-established operations in the Gulf of Mexico and operations in western Oklahoma that overlapped those of Cimarex. Mr. Korus covered the proposed project timetable and process.
Also at that meeting, Petrie Parkman provided background information about the current market environment for mergers and acquisitions, a general description and history of Magnum Hunter's financial performance and comparative financial and operational statistics of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex. The board approved the engagement of Holme Roberts & Owen as legal advisor and Petrie Parkman as financial advisor for the potential transaction.
On December 2, 2004, Magnum Hunter's management and financial advisors began hosting companies in Magnum Hunter's data room located in Irving, Texas. Each of the five entities that executed confidentiality agreements visited the data room for two days, with the final visit occurring on December 17, 2004. Cimarex conducted its initial review of data room material on December 8 and 9, 2004.
On December 10, 2004, Magnum Hunter's board held a regularly scheduled meeting, at which the financial advisors updated the board on data room activities.
On December 22, 2004, Cimarex and two other entities that had visited the data room gave Magnum Hunter separate indicative non-binding expressions of interest in the potential acquisition of the company.
On December 23, 2004, Magnum Hunter's board met telephonically to review and discuss the three expressions of interest. Senior management, Thompson & Knight and the financial advisors attended. The financial advisors made a presentation detailing and comparing the expressions of interest. After review and discussion by all parties of the expressions of interest under various measures of value, Magnum Hunter's board voted unanimously to allow all three entities additional time to
I-47
separately visit the data room for further review and to have the opportunity to submit board-approved, firm offers no later than January 6, 2005.
One of Cimarex's board members recused himself from participation on the Cimarex board throughout the negotiation process and the pendency of the closing of the merger, due to his service on the board of another oil and gas exploration and production company that could be viewed as a competitive bidder for Magnum Hunter.
On January 6, 2005, Cimarex offered an all-stock merger with an exchange ratio of 0.40 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock, which, based on Cimarex's then recent trading price, equated to about $15 per Magnum Hunter share, or a roughly 20 percent premium to Magnum Hunter's then current stock price.
Cimarex's initial proposal also included a mark-up of a preliminary merger agreement that had been provided by Magnum Hunter to all the entities expressing interest. Principal terms highlighted for further consideration by Magnum Hunter and its advisors included a $50 million break-up fee, an accompanying allowance for up to $5 million of associated costs and expenses related to a potential break up of a transaction under certain termination conditions, customary non-solicitation provisions, an agreement in principle that Magnum Hunter's outstanding stock options would largely be settled with cash payments rather than be converted into Cimarex stock options, and covenants pertaining to the pre-closing business of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex.
Each of the three entities that submitted indications of interest spent two additional days in the data room beginning December 28, 2004 and ending January 4, 2005, with Cimarex's visit occurring January 3 and 4, 2005. Further, Magnum Hunter senior management and the financial advisors visited the primary offices of each of the submitting entities between December 29, 2004 and January 5, 2005 to perform preliminary reciprocal due diligence due to the anticipation that any acquisition was likely to be effected through a stock-for-stock merger. On January 4, 2005, Magnum Hunter visited Cimarex's corporate headquarters office in Denver.
On January 5, 2005, Cimarex's board met at Cimarex's Denver office to consider the Magnum Hunter transaction. At that meeting Mr. Merelli and other members of Cimarex's senior management group provided the board with an extensive review of Magnum Hunter's proved reserves, exploration projects, production operations and financial condition. The management team also addressed the reasons for the proposed exchange ratio of 0.40, along with the range of acceptable exchange ratios that could potentially result in a positive financial outcome for Cimarex shareholders. Petrie Parkman made a presentation detailing its reference value analysis of Magnum Hunter shares and reviewed for the board its analysis of potentially competing entities. Holme Roberts & Owen reviewed the principal legal and business terms contained in the mark-up of the merger agreement that Cimarex had included with its earlier submission to Magnum Hunter of a preliminary indication of interest.
Following the presentations by management, Petrie Parkman and Holme Roberts & Owen, Cimarex's board discussed the relationship between the proposed exchange ratio and Petrie Parkman's assessment of an appropriate valuation range for Magnum Hunter common shares. They also discussed the principal terms of the merger agreement pertaining to non-solicitation provisions, termination conditions and the break-up fee.
Following those discussions, Cimarex's board unanimously, among all directors present, approved a resolution authorizing management to make a proposal to Magnum Hunter reflecting the exchange ratio and legal terms of the merger agreement discussed at the meeting. The Cimarex board also resolved that the offer was conditioned upon the delivery by Magnum Hunter to Cimarex of the disclosure schedule required under the proposed merger agreement and the absence of any information that the management of Cimarex might consider a material change.
I-48
On January 6, 2005 all three entities, including Cimarex, submitted updated offers to Magnum Hunter. One of the offers, which appeared superior to the other two, had not received approval by that company's board. Additionally, a fourth entity that did not participate in the data room process or execute a confidentiality agreement submitted an unsolicited offer that did not involve the acquisition of the entire company.
On January 7, 2005, Magnum Hunter's board met telephonically to review and discuss the three updated offers and the unsolicited offer. Also attending that meeting were Magnum Hunter's senior management, Thompson & Knight and the financial advisors.
On January 8 and 9, 2005, there were extensive phone conversations between Magnum Hunter's financial advisors and management of the entity that had made the proposal that appeared superior. There were also phone conversations between Thompson & Knight and counsel to that entity. On January 9 and early on January 10, there were phone conversations between the respective senior managements of that entity and Magnum Hunter. In the conversations on January 10, the chief executive officer of that entity effectively withdrew its offer by indicating that approval of its board would probably necessitate a reduction in the consideration offered.
On January 10, 2005, Magnum Hunter's full board met at the company's Irving, Texas offices. The financial advisors outlined and compared each of the four submitted offers. Thompson & Knight reviewed the major contingencies contained in each offer. Magnum Hunter's senior management also reviewed the offers and communicated to Magnum Hunter's board the weekend and early Monday conversations with the entity that had made the offer that appeared superior. Following these presentations and discussion, Magnum Hunter's board directed senior management to pursue further discussions with the remaining two entities prior to reconvening the board meeting early on January 11, 2005.
Early in the morning of January 11, 2005, Messrs. Box and Evans contacted Mr. Merelli. They discussed the general attractiveness of Cimarex's offer and indicated that because its all-stock structure was not exactly comparable to the other competing proposals it was not clear that Cimarex's offer was unequivocally superior. During that conversation, Messrs. Box and Evans also introduced to Mr. Merelli the concept of the potential distribution of Magnum Hunter's ownership interest in TEL Offshore Trust to the common stockholders of Magnum Hunter. Pursuant to that conversation, Mr. Merelli indicated to Messrs. Box and Evans that he would discuss with the Cimarex board the potential of raising the Cimarex exchange ratio offer to 0.42 shares per Magnum Hunter share and to allow for the distribution of the TEL Offshore Trust units to Magnum Hunter's stockholders.
Following the conversation of Messrs. Box and Evans with Mr. Merelli, the Magnum Hunter board met. Senior management reported on its conversations with Cimarex and the other entity. Following discussions, the board resolved to pursue a business combination with Cimarex under the terms discussed among Messrs. Box, Evans and Merelli, subject to further negotiation.
The Cimarex board also met telephonically during the afternoon of January 11, 2005 to review the revised proposal. Also attending that meeting either in person or telephonically were the senior management team, and representatives of Holme Roberts & Owen and Petrie Parkman.
Mr. Merelli informed the Cimarex board that Magnum Hunter had selected Cimarex as the winning bidder subject to Cimarex's ability to increase its proposed exchange ratio offer from 0.40 to 0.42 of a share of Cimarex common stock per Magnum Hunter common share and the ability of Magnum Hunter to distribute prior to closing its units in TEL Offshore Trust on a pro rata basis to its stockholders. Mr. Merelli stated that, based on management's original and updated relative valuation analysis, this adjustment would be acceptable and the resulting transaction would be beneficial to Cimarex's stockholders. Mr. Merelli also stated that Cimarex did not wish to acquire the TEL Offshore Trust units held by Magnum Hunter. Petrie Parkman reported that the revised offer was reasonable
I-49
based on its reference value range analysis for Magnum Hunter shares and its analysis of recent comparable transactions.
General discussion ensued pertaining to, among other issues, the remaining open items in the merger agreement, including the break-up fee, and the necessary receipt from Magnum Hunter of its disclosure schedules. Cimarex's board then approved and adopted resolutions authorizing management to negotiate a final merger agreement consistent with the revised financial terms and the legal terms presented to the directors but conditioned upon receipt of Magnum Hunter's disclosure schedules, the absence of material changes in representations and warranties, receipt of a fairness opinion, and final approval of a definitive merger agreement.
Mr. Korus recommended to Cimarex's board that, taking into account Petrie Parkman's role as financial advisor in the transaction and Cimarex's general corporate governance belief regarding the appropriateness of obtaining a fairness opinion from an investment banking firm other than its financial advisor, Lehman Brothers be engaged to provide a fairness opinion because they were highly qualified and to his knowledge they did not have any conflicts of interest arising from competing proposals. Mr. Korus had contacted Lehman Brothers about this matter, their qualifications and their availability on January 7, 2005.
Following the January 11, 2005 board meetings, Magnum Hunter's and Cimarex's respective management teams, legal counsel and financial advisors began negotiating the open items in the merger agreement and completing preparation of the disclosure schedules.
On January 12, 2005, Cimarex formally engaged Lehman Brothers to provide a fairness opinion and provided Lehman Brothers with the then current draft of the merger agreement and the proposed financial terms of contemplated transaction.
On January 14, 2005, Cimarex provided to Magnum Hunter an initial draft of its disclosure schedules. On January 18, 2005, Magnum Hunter provided to Cimarex an initial draft of its disclosure schedules.
During the week of January 17, 2005, Magnum Hunter's management, Thompson & Knight and the financial advisors traveled to the Denver, Colorado and Tulsa, Oklahoma offices of Cimarex to perform financial, operational and legal due diligence on Cimarex based upon the proposed stock-for-stock merger. Mr. Box and Mr. Merelli both attended the operational due diligence meetings in Tulsa on January 18 and 19. Thompson & Knight and Holme Roberts & Owen negotiated the final terms of the merger agreement at the latter's offices in Denver.
Also during the week of January 17 certain members of Cimarex's management team and Holme Roberts and Owen conducted further legal due diligence related to matters contained on the Magnum Hunter disclosure schedule and held several discussions with Magnum Hunter and Thompson & Knight regarding those items.
On January 20, 2005, Magnum Hunter's board met in person to consider and approve Magnum Hunter's 2005 capital expenditure budget. Later in the meeting Thompson & Knight, which had been meeting with Holme Roberts & Owen in Denver, joined the meeting telephonically to review major legal issues in the negotiation of the merger agreement.
On the morning of January 24, 2005, Cimarex's management team and legal counsel updated Mr. Merelli on the outcome of its ongoing legal due diligence. As a result of Cimarex's due diligence, Mr. Merelli contacted Mr. Box that afternoon to express a desire to revise the proposed exchange ratio. Following further discussions that day between Messrs. Merelli and Box, they agreed, subject to approval by their respective boards, to revise the proposed exchange ratio to 0.415 and to continue to permit the distribution of Magnum Hunter's ownership interest in TEL Offshore Trust to the common
I-50
stockholders of Magnum Hunter. The break-up fee was reduced to $45 million and the $5 million expense reimbursement upon termination of the merger agreement was eliminated.
On January 25, 2005, Magnum Hunter's full board met in Magnum Hunter's Irving, Texas office to review and discuss Cimarex's revised offer. Senior management updated the board on the terms of the proposed transaction and the results of due diligence. Thompson & Knight reviewed the terms of the proposed merger agreement and the resolution of legal issues. Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch rendered their oral opinions to Magnum Hunter's board, subsequently confirmed by delivery of written opinions each dated January 25, 2005, to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, as set forth in their respective opinions, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view to the holders of Magnum Hunter common stock (see "—Opinion of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Deutsche Bank Securities Inc." and "—Opinion of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated"). Both Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch informed Magnum Hunter's board of the potential temporary downward fluctuation in the market price of Cimarex's common stock immediately following announcement of the proposed merger.
Following discussions, Magnum Hunter's board unanimously approved the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and unanimously resolved to recommend that Magnum Hunter's stockholders vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Also on January 25, 2005, Cimarex's board met with its legal and financial advisors in Denver to review and discuss Cimarex's revised offer and the results of its legal due diligence. Mr. Steve Bell, Cimarex's senior vice president business development and land, and Holme Roberts & Owen updated the board on the overall results of their legal due diligence. Mr. Joe Albi, Cimarex's senior vice president corporate reservoir engineering, updated the board on the potential financial impact of the proposed exchange ratio of 0.415.
Holme Roberts and Owen also reviewed the outcome of negotiation of the final terms of the merger agreement, including a break-up fee of $45 million, certain non-solicitation and termination provisions, and the status of obtaining a voting agreement from Mr. Gary Evans. Lehman Brothers rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 25, 2005 that as of such date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the 0.415 exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Cimarex common stock (see "—Opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc. to the Cimarex Board of Directors"). Both Lehman Brothers and Petrie Parkman informed Cimarex's board of the potential temporary downward fluctuation in the market price of Cimarex's common stock immediately following announcement of the proposed merger.
Following further discussions of the matters presented at the meeting and management's current view on integration and longer-term staffing issues, Cimarex's board unanimously approved the merger agreement on the basis of a 0.415 exchange ratio, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and unanimously resolved to recommend that Cimarex stockholders vote to authorize the issuance of Cimarex common shares contemplated by the merger agreement.
The definitive merger agreement was executed on behalf of Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Merger Sub, effective as of January 25, 2005. Before the opening of the NYSE trading market on January 26, 2005, the parties issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the merger agreement.
On February 18, 2005, Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Merger Sub entered into an amendment to the merger agreement to clarify, among other things, the time that Magnum Hunter employees would be covered under existing Magnum Hunter severance plans and to modify the tax opinion to be delivered to Magnum Hunter in connection with the filing of the registration statement of which this
I-51
joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part and the tax opinion to be delivered to Magnum Hunter on the closing date of the merger, to take into account a recent ownership report filed by one of Magnum Hunter's non-U.S. holders.
On April 20, 2005, Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Merger Sub entered into a second amendment to the merger agreement to modify the tax opinion to be delivered to Magnum Hunter in connection with the filing of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part and the tax opinion to be delivered to Magnum Hunter on the closing date of the merger, in each case, with respect to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock.
Cimarex's Reasons for the Merger and Share Issuance
On January 25, 2005, Cimarex's board of directors, by unanimous vote of the directors present at the meeting, approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger, and resolved to recommend that Cimarex stockholders vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger. One of Cimarex's board members recused himself from participation on the Cimarex board throughout the negotiation process and the pendency of the closing of the merger, due to his service on the board of another oil and gas exploration and production company that could be viewed as a competitive bidder for Magnum Hunter.
In reaching its decision that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to and in the best interests of Cimarex and its stockholders, Cimarex's board consulted with Cimarex management and Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Cimarex's legal advisors, and Petrie Parkman & Co., Cimarex's financial advisor. Cimarex's board also considered a variety of factors with respect to the merger, including the following:
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's stable production with extensive low-risk drilling inventory;
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's large leasehold interest in the Permian Basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico;
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast projects;
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's substantial acreage position and exploration prospects in the Gulf of Mexico;
- •
- the
combined company's diversified asset base and strong financial position;
- •
- the
combined company's significant drilling inventory and opportunity to accelerate drilling;
- •
- the
fact that the combined company will be significantly larger than Cimarex is now and, as a result, should have greater exploration and production strengths, greater
liquidity in the market for its securities and better ability to consider future strategic opportunities that might not otherwise be possible;
- •
- the
opportunity to achieve exploration and production drilling efficiencies;
- •
- the
oral opinion delivered by Lehman Brothers, Cimarex's independent fairness opinion provider, on January 25, 2005, as subsequently confirmed in writing in an
opinion dated as of January 25, 2005, that, as of that date and based on and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations of review set forth in the
written opinion, the exchange ratio was fair from a financial point of view to Cimarex;
- •
- the terms of the merger agreement and the structure of the transaction, including the conditions to each company's obligation to complete the merger; and
I-52
- •
- the fact that the merger agreement requires Magnum Hunter to pay a termination fee of $45 million if the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with certain provisions of the merger agreement.
The Cimarex board of directors also identified and considered a number of potentially negative factors and risks in its deliberations concerning the merger, including but not limited to:
- •
- the
fact that there are significant risks inherent in combining and integrating two companies, including that the companies may not be successfully integrated, and that
successful
integration of the companies will require the dedication of significant management resources, which will temporarily detract attention from the day-to-day businesses of the
combined company;
- •
- the
fact that a meaningful portion of the total merger consideration is expected to be allocated to Magnum Hunter unproved resources, and there is always uncertainty in
successfully converting those resources into proved reserves;
- •
- the
risk of changes in oil and gas prices from those used to evaluate the merger;
- •
- the
increased level of indebtedness of the combined company compared to Cimarex's historic debt levels, as a result of Magnum Hunter's existing indebtedness and the costs
associated with the merger;
- •
- the
fact that the capital requirements necessary to achieve the expected growth of the combined company's businesses will be significant, and there can be no assurance that
the combined company will be able to fund all of its capital requirements from operating cash flows;
- •
- the
fact that the merger might not be completed as a result of a failure to satisfy the conditions contained in the merger agreement; and
- •
- the other matters described under the caption "—Risk Factors" beginning on page I-29.
After deliberation, the Cimarex board of directors concluded that, on balance, the potential benefits of the merger to Cimarex stockholders outweighed these risks and potential disadvantages.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the Cimarex board of directors in making its decision is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the Cimarex board of directors. In view of the variety of material factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, the Cimarex board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative or specific weight to any of these factors, and individual directors may have given different weight to different factors. Instead, the Cimarex board of directors made its determination based on the totality of the information presented to it.
The above description of the Cimarex board of directors' considerations relating to the merger is forward-looking in nature. This information should be read in light of the factors discussed above under "—Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page I-9.
Recommendation of the Cimarex Board of Directors
At its meeting on January 25, 2005, after due consideration, the Cimarex board of directors, by unanimous vote of the directors present, adopted resolutions:
- •
- determining
that the merger agreement, the merger, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, and the other transactions contemplated thereby are advisable and in
the best interests of Cimarex and its stockholders;
- •
- approving and adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; and
I-53
- •
- recommending that the Cimarex stockholders vote "FOR" the approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger.
In considering the recommendation of Cimarex's board of directors with respect to the share issuance, you should be aware that some officers and directors of Cimarex have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Cimarex stockholders generally. Cimarex's board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them in approving the merger agreement and the merger. For more information on these interests, see "—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" beginning on page I-104.
Magnum Hunter's Reasons for the Merger
On January 25, 2005, Magnum Hunter's board unanimously determined that the merger is fair to, and in the best interests of, Magnum Hunter and its stockholders, approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger, and resolved to recommend that Magnum Hunter stockholders vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
In reaching its decision, Magnum Hunter's board consulted with Magnum Hunter's management, Magnum Hunter's outside legal advisors, and Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch, Magnum Hunter's financial advisors. Magnum Hunter's board of directors believes the merger is desirable for the following principal reasons:
- •
- the
recent performance of Cimarex's common stock and the fact that the merger consideration represented a premium of approximately 26% above the closing price of Magnum
Hunter's common stock on the day of the board's approval;
- •
- a
review of other strategic alternatives potentially available to Magnum Hunter (including other potential transactions) and their relative potential advantages and
disadvantages compared to those associated with the merger;
- •
- the
combined company will be significantly larger than Magnum Hunter and should have greater financial, operational and technical strengths that should enable it to consider
and more effectively pursue additional types of opportunities;
- •
- the
oral opinions of Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch delivered to the board of directors of Magnum Hunter on January 25, 2005 and subsequently confirmed in writing to
the effect that, as of such date, and based on and subject to the matters respectively set forth therein, the exchange ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Magnum Hunter
common stock;
- •
- the
combined company's larger market capitalization and a more liquid trading market for its common stock, which Magnum Hunter's board believed could result in increased
equity research coverage and potentially a better trading multiple due to improved liquidity;
- •
- the
combined company's improved capital structure and the expected benefits to be derived from the cash reflected on Cimarex's balance sheet as compared to the leverage
previously employed by Magnum Hunter;
- •
- the
strong asset overlap of the two companies in the Permian Basin, Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast regions;
- •
- the
rate of return focus of Cimarex's internal drilling efforts and the recent and historical production growth of Cimarex;
- •
- the combined company's increased inventory of producing properties and the Magnum Hunter board's belief that the merger would maximize the value and development potential of its asset base;
I-54
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's board consideration of Magnum Hunter's financial and operational position, taking into account current commodity prices and other current industry, economic
and market conditions;
- •
- the
opinion of Magnum Hunter's outside legal counsel that the merger could generally be accomplished on a tax-free basis;
- •
- presentations
by, and discussions with, senior executives of Magnum Hunter and representatives of its outside legal counsel regarding the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement;
- •
- the
results of the business, legal and financial due diligence investigations of Cimarex conducted by Magnum Hunter's management and legal and financial advisors;
- •
- the
decision of Magnum Hunter's CEO to retire in 2005;
- •
- the
results of the engineering due diligence investigations of Cimarex conducted by Magnum Hunter's management;
- •
- the
Magnum Hunter board's confidence in the ability of Cimarex's chief executive officer to lead the combined company and continue to enhance stockholder value;
- •
- the
terms of the merger agreement and the structure of the transaction, including the conditions to each company's obligations to complete the merger;
- •
- the
fact that under the terms of the merger agreement one member of Magnum Hunter's board would join the Cimarex board of directors following the merger; and
- •
- the fact that holders of Magnum Hunter common stock would own approximately 46% of the combined company.
Magnum Hunter's board also identified and considered a number of potentially negative factors and risks in its deliberations concerning the merger, including but not limited to:
- •
- the
risk that the merger might not be completed as a result of a failure to satisfy one or more conditions to the merger;
- •
- the
risk that the operations of the two companies may not be successfully integrated;
- •
- the
size of the premium represented by the merger consideration relative to the pre-announcement value of Magnum Hunter's common stock might be reduced or
eliminated by a decline in Cimarex's common stock price through the time the merger is consummated;
- •
- the
risk that Cimarex's reserve estimates were not prepared or audited by independent engineering consultants in a manner consistent with Magnum Hunter's past practices;
- •
- the
limitations on Magnum Hunter's ability to solicit other offers as well as the possibility that it could be required to pay a $45 million termination fee in
certain circumstances;
- •
- lack
of identified long-term drilling prospects after 2005; and
- •
- other matters described under the caption "—Risk Factors" beginning on page I-29.
After deliberation, the Magnum Hunter board of directors concluded that, on balance, the potential benefits of the merger to Magnum Hunter stockholders outweighed these risks and potential disadvantages.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the Magnum Hunter board of directors in making its decision is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the Magnum Hunter board of directors. In view of the variety of material factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, the Magnum Hunter board of directors did
I-55
not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative or specific weight to any of these factors, and individual directors may have given different weight to different factors. Instead, the Magnum Hunter board of directors made its determination based on the totality of the information presented to it.
The above description of the Magnum Hunter board of directors' considerations relating to the merger is forward-looking in nature. This information should be read in light of the factors discussed above under "—Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page I-9.
Recommendation of the Magnum Hunter Board of Directors
At its meeting on January 25, 2005, after due consideration, the Magnum Hunter board of directors unanimously adopted resolutions:
- •
- determining
that the merger agreement, the merger, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, and the other transactions contemplated thereby are advisable and in
the best interests of Magnum Hunter and its stockholders;
- •
- approving
and adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; and
- •
- recommending that the Magnum Hunter stockholders vote "FOR" the approval of the merger agreement.
In considering the recommendation of Magnum Hunter's board of directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that some officers and directors of Magnum Hunter have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Magnum Hunter stockholders generally. Magnum Hunter's board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them in approving the merger agreement and the merger. For more information on these interests, see "—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" beginning on page I-104.
Under a letter agreement dated as of December 1, 2004, Cimarex retained Petrie Parkman to act as a financial advisor in connection with Cimarex's potential merger with or acquisition of Magnum Hunter. Petrie Parkman was not requested to, and did not, render an opinion to the Cimarex board of directors in connection with the merger. Cimarex agreed to pay Petrie Parkman $4.575 million, the majority of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger, for its financial advisory services in connection with the merger. In addition, Cimarex agreed to reimburse Petrie Parkman for certain expenses incurred by it in connection with its engagement, including fees and expenses of counsel. Cimarex also entered into customary indemnification agreements with Petrie Parkman.
Petrie Parkman, as part of its investment banking business, is continually engaged in the evaluation of energy-related businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and evaluations for corporate or other purposes. Petrie Parkman is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience in transactions similar to the proposed merger. Petrie Parkman has in the recent past provided investment banking services to Cimarex and has received customary fees for such services.
Opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc. to the Cimarex Board of Directors
Lehman Brothers was retained by Cimarex on January 12, 2005, solely to render its opinion in connection with the merger. On January 25, 2005, Lehman Brothers rendered its written opinion to the
I-56
board of directors of Cimarex that as of that date, and based upon and subject to the matters and qualifications stated in the opinion letter, from a financial point of view, the exchange ratio to be paid by Cimarex in the merger is fair to Cimarex.
THE FULL TEXT OF LEHMAN BROTHERS' OPINION DATED JANUARY 25, 2005, IS INCLUDED AS ANNEX B TO THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. HOLDERS OF CIMAREX'S COMMON STOCK ARE ENCOURAGED TO READ LEHMAN BROTHERS' OPINION CAREFULLY IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE PROCEDURES FOLLOWED, FACTORS CONSIDERED, ASSUMPTIONS MADE AND QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE REVIEW UNDERTAKEN BY LEHMAN BROTHERS IN RENDERING ITS OPINION. THIS SUMMARY OF THE LEHMAN BROTHERS OPINION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF THE OPINION.
LEHMAN BROTHERS' OPINION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CIMAREX IN CONNECTION WITH ITS CONSIDERATION OF THE MERGER. LEHMAN BROTHERS' OPINION IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY STOCKHOLDER OF CIMAREX OR MAGNUM HUNTER AS TO HOW SUCH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD VOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE MERGER. LEHMAN BROTHERS WAS NOT REQUESTED TO OPINE AS TO, AND ITS OPINION DOES NOT ADDRESS, CIMAREX'S UNDERLYING BUSINESS DECISION TO PROCEED WITH OR EFFECT THE MERGER.
Lehman Brothers, in arriving at its opinion, reviewed and analyzed:
- (1)
- the
merger agreement and its schedules, and the specific terms of the merger;
- (2)
- publicly
available information concerning Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that Lehman Brothers believed to be relevant to the analysis, including, without limitation, the Annual Reports on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- (3)
- financial
and operating information with respect to the respective businesses, operations and prospects of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as furnished to Lehman Brothers by Cimarex and
Magnum Hunter, respectively;
- (4)
- estimates
of proved and non-proved reserves generated internally at each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, third-party reserve reports for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as
of December 31, 2003, and projected future production, revenue, operating costs and capital investments for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter provided to Lehman Brothers by the managements of
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively;
- (5)
- the
trading histories of Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock from January 22, 2004 to January 21, 2005 and a comparison of those trading histories with
each other and with those of other companies that Lehman Brothers deemed relevant;
- (6)
- a
comparison of the historical financial results and present financial condition of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter with each other and with those of other companies that Lehman Brothers
deemed relevant;
- (7)
- a
comparison of the financial terms of the merger with the financial terms of certain other transactions that Lehman Brothers deemed relevant;
- (8)
- the
pro forma impact of the merger on the future financial performance of Cimarex;
- (9)
- the relative contributions of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter to the current and future financial performance of the combined company on a pro forma basis; and
I-57
- (10)
- published estimates of independent equity research analysts (including Lehman Brothers') with respect to the future financial performance of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter.
In addition, Lehman Brothers:
- (1)
- had
discussions with the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter concerning
- (a)
- the
respective businesses, operations, assets, financial conditions, reserves, production profiles, hedging levels, exploration programs and prospects of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and
- (b)
- the
strategic benefits to Cimarex of the merger, and
- (2)
- undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as Lehman Brothers deemed appropriate.
Lehman Brothers, in arriving at its opinion, assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information used by it without assuming any responsibility for independent verification of such information and further relied upon the assurances of the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. Lehman Brothers was not provided with, and did not have access to, financial projections of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter prepared by the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively. Accordingly, upon advice of Cimarex, Lehman Brothers assumed that the published estimates of independent equity research analysts were a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the future financial performance of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, and that each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter would perform substantially in accordance with such estimates. Upon advice of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, Lehman Brothers assumed that:
- (i)
- the
third-party reserve reports for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as of December 31, 2003, were a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the reserve balances at each of
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as of December 31, 2003; and
- (ii)
- the estimates of proved and non-proved reserves generated internally at each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and the projected future production, revenue, operating costs and capital investments for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter provided to Lehman Brothers by the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, and that the estimates of proved and non-proved reserves and the other projected metrics would be realized substantially in accordance therewith.
In addition, upon the direction of Cimarex, Lehman Brothers did not analyze the merits or the amounts of any actual or potential contingent liabilities of Magnum Hunter or factor them into its analysis in arriving at its opinion. Lehman Brothers, in arriving at its opinion, did not conduct a physical inspection of the properties and facilities of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and did not make or obtain from third parties any evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter other than the third party reserve reports. Upon advice of Cimarex and its legal and accounting advisors, Lehman Brothers assumed that the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and therefore as a tax-free transaction to the stockholders of Cimarex. Lehman Brothers' opinion necessarily was based upon market, economic and other conditions as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, January 25, 2005. In addition, Lehman Brothers did not express an opinion as to the price at which shares of common stock of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter actually would trade following the announcement of the merger.
I-58
In connection with rendering its opinion, Lehman Brothers performed certain financial, comparative and other analyses as described below. In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers did not ascribe a specific range of value to Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, but rather made its determination of the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Cimarex of the exchange ratio to be paid by Cimarex in the merger on the basis of the financial, comparative and other analyses described below. The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial and comparative analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances, and, therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description. Furthermore, in arriving at its fairness opinion, Lehman Brothers did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, Lehman Brothers believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that considering any portion of such analyses and factors, without considering all analyses and factors as a whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying the opinion. In its analyses, Lehman Brothers made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter. Any estimates contained in the analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than as set forth in the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses could actually be sold.
Valuation Analyses Used to Derive Implied Exchange Ratios
Lehman Brothers prepared separate valuations of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter using the following methodologies: net asset valuation analysis, comparable company analysis and comparable transactions analysis. Lehman Brothers understands that, prior to the merger, Magnum Hunter intends to distribute the units of beneficial interests it holds of the publicly-traded TEL Offshore Trust to its stockholders in the form of a dividend. Accordingly, Lehman Brothers has excluded these units of beneficial interest in TEL Offshore Trust from its valuation of Magnum Hunter. Each of the methodologies listed above was used to generate a reference enterprise value range for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter. The enterprise value range for each company was adjusted for appropriate on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities to arrive at a common equity value range (in aggregate dollars) for each company. The equity value range was divided by fully diluted shares outstanding, which was comprised of primary shares and the dilutive effect of outstanding options and warrants, if applicable, as of January 21, 2005 to derive an equity value range per share. The equity value ranges per share were used to derive the implied exchange ratios which were then compared to the exchange ratio.
The various valuation methodologies noted above and the implied exchange ratios derived therefrom are included in the following table. This table should be read together with the more detailed descriptions set forth below. In particular, in applying the various valuation methodologies to the particular businesses, operations and prospects of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, and the particular circumstances of the merger, Lehman Brothers made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis. In addition, Lehman Brothers made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter. Accordingly, the methodologies and the implied exchange ratios derived therefrom set forth in the table must be considered as a whole and in the context of the narrative description of the financial analyses, including the assumptions underlying these analyses. Considering the implied exchange ratios set forth in the table without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the assumptions underlying these analyses,
I-59
could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying, and conclusions represented by, Lehman Brothers' opinion.
| Valuation Methodology |
Summary Description of Valuation Methodology |
Implied Exchange Ratio Range |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Asset Valuation Analysis | Net present valuation of after-tax cash flows generated by producing to exhaustion existing proved, probable, possible and exploratory reserves using selected hydrocarbon pricing scenarios and discount rates plus the evaluation of certain other assets and liabilities | |||
| — Case I Commodity Prices | 0.276 - 0.399 | |||
| — Case II Commodity Prices | 0.407 - 0.554 | |||
| — Case III Commodity Prices | 0.433 - 0.569 | |||
| Comparable Company Analysis | Market valuation benchmark based on trading multiples of selected comparable companies for selected financial and asset-based measures | 0.292 - 0.439 | ||
| Comparable Transactions Analysis | Market valuation benchmark based on consideration paid in selected comparable transactions | 0.328 - 0.516 | ||
| Exchange Ratio to be Paid by Cimarex in the Merger | 0.415 |
Net Asset Valuation Analysis. Lehman Brothers estimated the present value of the future after-tax cash flows expected to be generated from each company's proved reserves as of December 31, 2003, based on estimated reserves and production cost estimates, as adjusted to take into account such reserve and production cost estimates provided by Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's managements, respectively, and discussed with each of Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's managements, respectively. The present values of the future after-tax cash flows were determined using a range of discount rates based on geography and reserve category risk and assuming a tax rate of 37%. Lehman Brothers added to such estimated proved reserves the values of certain other assets and liabilities, including each company's probable and possible reserves, each company's exploration portfolio, Magnum Hunter's current commodity hedging portfolio, Magnum Hunter's gas gathering and oilfield services businesses and Cimarex's gas marketing business. In addition, Cimarex's net asset value was adjusted to account for the value of proved undeveloped reserves which it does not recognize for accounting purposes and excludes from its third-party and company reserve reports. The net asset valuation analysis was performed under three commodity price scenarios (Case I, Case II and Case III), which are described below.
The natural gas and oil price forecasts employed by Lehman Brothers were based on New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, price forecasts (Henry Hub, Louisiana delivery for natural gas and West Texas Intermediate, Cushing, Oklahoma delivery for oil) from which adjustments were made to reflect location and quality differentials. NYMEX gas price quotations are stated in heating value equivalents per million British Thermal Units, or MMBtu, which are adjusted to reflect the value per thousand cubic feet, or MCF, of gas. NYMEX oil price quotations are stated in dollars per barrel, or
I-60
BBL, of crude oil. The table below presents a summary of NYMEX natural gas and oil price forecasts employed by Lehman Brothers for each commodity price scenario.
| |
2004E |
2005E |
2006E |
2007E |
2008E |
2009E |
2010E |
2011 |
Escalation Thereafter |
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Hub ($MMBtu) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Case I | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.00 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
| Case II | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 5.00 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
| Case III | $ | 7.11 | $ | 6.50 | $ | 6.39 | $ | 5.97 | $ | 5.64 | $ | 5.35 | $ | 5.15 | $ | 5.15 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
| West Texas Intermediate ($/BBL) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Case I | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 24.00 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
| Case II | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
| Case III | $ | 46.46 | $ | 47.58 | $ | 44.19 | $ | 42.18 | $ | 40.05 | $ | 39.90 | $ | 39.15 | $ | 38.95 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
The net asset valuation analyses yielded valuations for Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that implied a 0.276 to 0.399 exchange ratio for Case I, a 0.407 to 0.554 exchange ratio for Case II and a 0.433 to 0.569 exchange ratio for Case III. The exchange ratio of 0.415 to be paid by Cimarex in the merger falls within the range implied by Case II, slightly below the low end of the range implied by Case III and slightly above the high end of the range implied by Case I.
Comparable Company Analysis. Lehman Brothers reviewed the public stock market trading multiples for selected exploration and production companies:
- •
- Chesapeake
Energy Corporation
- •
- Comstock
Resources, Inc.
- •
- Forest
Oil Corporation
- •
- The
Houston Exploration Company
- •
- Newfield
Exploration Company
- •
- Pogo
Producing Company
- •
- Stone
Energy Corporation
- •
- Whiting Petroleum Corporation
The companies listed above, referred to as the selected companies, were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations that, for purposes of this analysis, may be considered similar to Cimarex and Magnum Hunter. Using publicly available information including certain estimates from independent equity research analysts, Lehman Brothers calculated and analyzed equity and adjusted capitalization multiples of certain historical and projected financial and operating criteria such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization and exploration expense, or EBITDE; earnings; discretionary cash flow, or DCF; proved reserves; and daily production. The adjusted capitalization of each company was obtained by adding its total debt to the sum of the market value of its common equity, the book value of its preferred stock and the book value of any minority interest minus its cash balance. The ratios of each company of adjusted capitalization to proved reserves and to daily production were calculated by excluding the estimated value of non-proved reserves and other businesses that are unrelated to exploration and production of oil and gas from each
I-61
selected company's adjusted capitalization calculation. With respect to the selected companies, Lehman Brothers considered the following statistics and multiples:
Selected Companies' Statistics and Multiples
| |
Median |
Mean |
High |
Low |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Value as a Multiple of: | |||||||||||||
| Earnings | |||||||||||||
| 2004E | 9.4x | 10.0x | 14.7x | 7.1x | |||||||||
| 2005E | 9.3x | 9.4x | 11.5x | 7.4x | |||||||||
| Discretionary Cash Flow Per Share | |||||||||||||
| 2004E | 3.6x | 3.6x | 4.1x | 2.9x | |||||||||
| 2005E | 3.5x | 3.4x | 4.3x | 2.8x | |||||||||
| Adjusted Capitalization as a Multiple of: | |||||||||||||
| EBITDE | |||||||||||||
| 2004E | 4.7x | 4.8x | 6.8x | 3.5x | |||||||||
| 2005E | 4.0x | 4.2x | 5.6x | 3.3x | |||||||||
| Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe) | $ | 1.86 | $ | 1.91 | $ | 2.58 | $ | 1.52 | |||||
| Daily Production ($/Mcfe per day) | $ | 6,424 | $ | 6,467 | $ | 9,316 | $ | 3,728 | |||||
This methodology yielded valuations for Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that implied a 0.292 to 0.439 exchange ratio. The exchange ratio of 0.415 to be paid by Cimarex in the merger falls within this range.
Because of the inherent differences between the corporate structures, businesses, operations, commodity mix and prospects of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and the corporate structures, businesses, operations, commodity mix and prospects of the companies included in the comparable company groups, Lehman Brothers believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the analysis and, accordingly, also made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the financial and operating characteristics of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and companies in the comparable company groups that would affect the public trading values of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and such comparable companies.
Comparable Transactions Analysis. Lehman Brothers reviewed certain publicly available information on selected corporate level and asset level exploration and production transactions which were announced from January 2001 to January 2005 including, but not limited to:
- •
- Noble
Energy Inc. / Patina Oil & Gas Corporation
- •
- Pioneer
Natural Resources Company / Evergreen Resources, Inc.
- •
- EnCana
Corporation / Tom Brown, Inc.
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / Westport Resources Corporation
- •
- Plains
Exploration & Production Company / Nuevo Energy Company
- •
- Westport
Resources Corporation / Belco Oil & Gas
- •
- Kerr-McGee Corporation / HS Resources, Inc.
Corporate Transactions
I-62
- •
- XTO
Energy Inc. / Antero Resources Corporation
- •
- Chesapeake
Energy Corporation / BRG Petroleum Corporation
- •
- Magnum
Hunter Resources Inc. / Tom Brown Inc.
- •
- Hilcorp
Energy Inc. / ConocoPhillips
- •
- Citation
Oil & Gas Corporation / Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
- •
- Forest Oil Corporation / Unocal Corporation
Asset Transactions
For the corporate transactions analysis for each company, relevant transaction multiples were analyzed including the total purchase price (equity purchase price plus assumed obligations) divided by latest twelve month EBITDE and total purchase price, adjusted by the value allocated to non-proved reserves and to other businesses that are unrelated to exploration and production of oil and gas, divided by proved reserves and daily production. Other businesses that are unrelated to exploration and production of oil and gas, or Non-E&P Operations, included, in the case of Cimarex, Cimarex's gas marketing business and, in the case of Magnum Hunter, Magnum Hunter's gas gathering and oilfield services businesses. In addition, for each company, relevant transaction multiples were analyzed on a geographic basis to take into account the companies' differing geographic reserve mix. On a geographic basis, Cimarex's proved reserves were segmented into the following categories: Mid-Continent, Permian Basin, Gulf Coast and Western. Similarly, Magnum Hunter's proved reserves were segmented into the following geographic categories: Gulf Coast, Gulf of Mexico, Mid-Continent and Permian Basin. For the proved reserves and daily production multiples, the values of each company's respective non-proved reserves and their respective Non-E&P Operations were separately assessed and added to the analysis. This analysis indicated the following statistics and multiples:
COMPARABLE TRANSACTIONS' STATISTICS AND MULTIPLES
| Transaction Value as a Multiple of: |
Median |
Mean |
High |
Low |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe) | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 2.06 | $ | 0.67 | ||||
| Daily Production ($/Mcfe per day) | $ | 4,724 | $ | 5,429 | $ | 12,187 | $ | 1,947 | ||||
| Latest Twelve Month EBITDE | 6.7x | 7.1x | 14.2x | 3.2x | ||||||||
Proved Reserves by Geography (as applicable): |
||||||||||||
| Gulf Coast | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 2.73 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
| Gulf of Mexico | $ | 1.61 | $ | 1.64 | $ | 2.53 | $ | 1.11 | ||||
| Mid-Continent | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 4.42 | $ | 0.54 | ||||
| Permian Basin | $ | 1.01 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
| Western | $ | 0.93 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 3.00 | $ | 0.53 | ||||
This methodology yielded valuations for Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that implied an exchange ratio range of 0.328 to 0.516. The exchange ratio of 0.415 to be paid by Cimarex in the merger falls within this range.
Because the market conditions, rationale and circumstances surrounding each of the transactions analyzed were specific to each transaction and because of the inherent differences between the businesses, operations and prospects of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and the acquired businesses analyzed, Lehman Brothers believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the analysis and, accordingly, also made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the characteristics of these transactions and the merger that would affect the acquisition values of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and such acquired companies.
I-63
Historical Common Stock Trading Analysis
Lehman Brothers reviewed the daily historical closing prices of Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock for the period from January 22, 2004 to January 21, 2005. Lehman Brothers analyzed the ratio of the daily closing share price for Cimarex to the corresponding closing share price of Magnum Hunter over the one year period. Over the one year period, the ratio ranged from 0.311 to 0.398. In addition, Lehman Brothers reviewed the ratio of the closing share prices for Cimarex and Magnum Hunter based on 5-day, 10-day, 20-day, 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, 120-day, 180-day and one-year averages, respectively, as of January 21, 2005. This analysis implied exchange ratios ranging from 0.332 to 0.345. The foregoing historical stock trading analysis was presented to the board of directors of Cimarex to provide it with background information and perspective with respect to the relative historical share prices of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter common stock.
Contribution Analysis
Lehman Brothers analyzed the relative contribution of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter to the combined company based on equity market capitalization and certain 2004 and 2005 financial data as projected by equity research consensus estimates. Magnum Hunter estimates excluded the contribution from its units of beneficial interest in TEL Offshore Trust. This analysis indicated that Cimarex will contribute approximately 52% to 57% of the combined company's net income and 49% to 53% of the combined company's DCF for the periods analyzed. Lehman Brothers also analyzed the relative contribution of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter to the combined company based on the current equity market capitalization of each company. This analysis indicated that Cimarex will contribute 58% of the combined company's equity value. The contribution percentages above implied exchange ratios ranging from 0.335 to 0.490. The exchange ratio of 0.415 to be paid by Cimarex in the merger falls within this range.
Lehman Brothers noted that the primary shortcoming of contribution analysis is that it treats all cash flow and earnings the same regardless of capitalization, expected growth rates, upside potential or risk profile.
Pro Forma Merger Consequences Analysis
Lehman Brothers analyzed the pro forma impact of the merger on Cimarex's projected earnings per share and DCF per share. Lehman Brothers prepared a pro forma merger model which incorporated the financial projections of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as projected by equity research consensus estimates. Lehman Brothers then compared the earnings per share and DCF per share of Cimarex on a standalone basis to the earnings per share and DCF per share of Cimarex pro forma for the merger. Lehman Brothers noted that the merger would have been dilutive to Cimarex's pro forma earnings per share and slightly accretive to DCF per share in 2004. Lehman Brothers also noted that the merger is expected to be dilutive to earnings per share and accretive to DCF per share in 2005.
Premium Analysis
Lehman Brothers reviewed certain publicly available information related to selected corporate transactions to calculate the amount of the premiums paid by the acquirers to the acquired company's stockholders. Lehman Brothers analyzed the following selected transactions that were announced from December 2000 to December 2004:
- •
- Noble
Energy Inc. / Patina Oil & Gas Corporation
- •
- Petro-Canada
/ Prima Energy Corporation
- •
- Forest Oil Corporation / Wiser Oil Company
I-64
- •
- EnCana
Corporation / Tom Brown Inc.
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / Westport Resources Corporation
- •
- Plains
Exploration & Production Company / Nuevo Energy Company
- •
- Dominion
Resources, Inc. / Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp.
- •
- Devon
Energy Corporation / Mitchell Energy & Development Corp.
- •
- Amerada
Hess Corporation / Triton Energy Ltd.
- •
- Westport
Resources Corporation / Belco Oil & Gas Corporation
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / HS Resources, Inc.
- •
- The
Williams Companies, Inc. / Barrett Resources Corporation
- •
- Marathon Oil Corporation / Pennaco Energy, Inc.
Lehman Brothers calculated the premiums paid by the acquirer by comparing the per share purchase price in each transaction to the historical stock price of the acquired company as of 1-day, 1-week, and 4-weeks prior to the announcement date as well as based upon the 52-week high prior to the announcement date. Lehman Brothers compared the premiums paid in the precedent transactions to the premium levels implied by the exchange ratio to be paid by Cimarex in the merger. The table below sets forth the summary results of the analysis:
| |
Percentage Premium/(Discount) to the Price Prior to Transaction Announcement |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Transactions |
1-Day |
5-Days |
20-Days |
52-Week High |
|||||
| Mean | 22.6 | % | 24.7 | % | 29.5 | % | 7.1 | % | |
| Median | 22.0 | % | 21.5 | % | 32.4 | % | 9.0 | % | |
| High | 60.0 | % | 65.0 | % | 53.6 | % | 53.6 | % | |
| Low | (4.3 | %) | 1.2 | % | 5.4 | % | (17.0 | %) | |
| Implied Premium based on the Exchange Ratio Paid by Cimarex in the Merger (as of January 21, 2005 close) | 23.8 | % | 31.9 | % | 29.6 | % | 18.1 | % | |
Based upon this analysis, Lehman Brothers selected an implied premium range of 20% to 30% from the selected transactions. This range implied exchange ratios ranging from 0.402 to 0.436. The exchange ratio of 0.415 to be paid by Cimarex in the merger falls within this range.
Lehman Brothers is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and, as part of its investment banking activities, is regularly engaged in, among other things, the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes. The Cimarex board of directors selected Lehman Brothers because of its expertise, reputation and familiarity with Cimarex and the energy industry generally and because its investment banking professionals have substantial experience in transactions comparable to the merger.
Pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter agreement, dated January 12, 2005, between Lehman Brothers and Cimarex, Cimarex paid Lehman Brothers a fee upon delivery of Lehman Brothers' fairness opinion, dated January 25, 2005. Cimarex has also agreed to pay Lehman Brothers an additional fee at the time of closing. In addition, Cimarex has agreed to reimburse Lehman Brothers for its reasonable expenses incurred in connection with its engagement, and to indemnify Lehman Brothers and certain related persons against certain liabilities in connection with its engagement, including certain liabilities which may arise under federal securities laws. Lehman Brothers
I-65
also has performed various investment banking services for Magnum Hunter in the past and has received customary fees for such services.
In the ordinary course of its business, Lehman Brothers may actively trade in the debt and/or equity securities of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
Opinions of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
At the January 25, 2005 meeting of Magnum Hunter's board of directors, Deutsche Bank rendered its oral opinion to Magnum Hunter's board of directors, subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of January 25, 2005, and subject to and based on the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of the review undertaken by Deutsche Bank, the 0.415 exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to Magnum Hunter common stockholders.
The full text of Deutsche Bank's opinion, dated January 25, 2005, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of the review by Deutsche Bank, is attached as Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. We urge Magnum Hunter stockholders to read this opinion carefully and in its entirety. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Deutsche Bank opinion.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Deutsche Bank, among other things:
- •
- reviewed
certain publicly available financial statements and other business and financial information of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex, respectively;
- •
- reviewed
certain internal financial statements and other financial and operating data concerning Magnum Hunter and Cimarex prepared by the respective managements of Magnum
Hunter and Cimarex;
- •
- reviewed
certain financial forecasts prepared by the respective managements of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex;
- •
- discussed
with senior executives of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex certain strategic, financial and operational benefits they expect to derive from the merger;
- •
- discussed
the past and current operations and financial condition and the prospects of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex with senior executives of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex;
- •
- reviewed
the pro forma impact of the merger on, among other things, Magnum Hunter's and Cimarex's earnings per share, cash flow, consolidated capitalization and financial
ratios;
- •
- reviewed
information prepared by the members of the respective senior managements of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex relating to the relative contributions of Magnum Hunter and
Cimarex to the combined company;
- •
- reviewed
the reported prices and trading activity for Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock;
- •
- compared
the prices and trading activity of Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock with similar information for the securities of certain other publicly traded
companies;
- •
- reviewed
the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of certain business combination transactions that it deemed comparable in whole or in part;
- •
- participated
in certain discussions and negotiations among representatives of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and their financial and legal advisors;
- •
- reviewed
the merger agreement and certain related documents; and
- •
- performed such other analyses and considered such other factors as it deemed appropriate.
I-66
In preparing its opinion, Deutsche Bank relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied or otherwise made available to it and assumed such accuracy and completeness for purposes of rendering its opinion. With respect to the financial forecasts that Deutsche Bank received from the respective managements of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex, as well as information relating to certain cost savings, operating efficiencies, revenue effects and financial synergies expected by Magnum Hunter and Cimarex to be achieved as a result of the merger, Deutsche Bank assumed that the information provided was reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, as the case may be. Deutsche Bank did not make any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, nor was Deutsche Bank furnished with any such appraisals.
For purposes of rendering its opinion, Deutsche Bank assumed that:
- •
- the
representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement are true and correct,
- •
- the
parties to the merger agreement will perform all of their covenants and agreements under the merger agreement, and that all conditions to the parties' obligations to
complete the merger will be satisfied without any waiver;
- •
- all
material approvals and consents required in connection with the merger will be obtained and that, in connection with obtaining any such approvals and consents, or any
amendments, modifications or waivers to any agreements, instruments or orders to which Magnum Hunter or Cimarex is a party or is subject or by which it is bound, no limitations, restrictions or
conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would have a material adverse effect on Magnum Hunter or Cimarex or materially reduce the contemplated benefits of the
merger; and
- •
- the merger will be tax-free to each of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and their respective common stockholders.
The opinion of Deutsche Bank is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, the information made available to Deutsche Bank as of, and the financial condition of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex on, January 25, 2005.
Deutsche Bank's Financial Analysis
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Deutsche Bank in connection with rendering its opinion. These summaries of financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. In order to understand fully the financial analyses used by Deutsche Bank, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis. Deutsche Bank compared the daily closing share price of Magnum Hunter common stock to the daily closing price of Cimarex common stock during the period beginning January 17, 2003 and ending January 19, 2005, and reviewed and analyzed the historical exchange ratios implied by these comparisons.
Deutsche Bank also reviewed and analyzed the average of these historical daily exchange ratios over various periods beginning January 17, 2003 and ending January 19, 2005. The following table presents the implied exchange ratios during the periods covered and as of January 19, 2005.
I-67
Cimarex Shares per Magnum Hunter Share
| Period |
Average Exchange Ratio(1) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| At January 19, 2005 | 0.336 | x | |
| Last one day | 0.329 | ||
| Last five-day average | 0.334 | ||
| Last month average | 0.337 | ||
| Last 3 months average | 0.342 | ||
| Last 6 months average | 0.338 | ||
| Last 12 months average | 0.346 | ||
| Last 2 years average | 0.344 |
- (1)
- Averages of exchange ratios based on daily closing prices.
During all of the periods covered in the table above, the implied exchange ratio was below the 0.415 exchange ratio.
Last Twelve Months Trading Analysis. Deutsche Bank reviewed the daily closing share prices of Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock over the twelve months ended January 19, 2005. The table below shows the twelve-month high and low closing prices during that period, compared with a closing price on January 19, 2005 of $13.06 per share for Magnum Hunter common stock and $38.91 per share for Cimarex common stock:
January 20, 2004 through January 19, 2005
| |
High |
Low |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | $ | 13.72 | $ | 8.33 | ||
| Cimarex | 41.03 | 24.53 | ||||
The range of exchange ratios implied by this range of values for Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock is between 0.203x and 0.559x. The foregoing analysis was unaffected by the price movements in Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock from January 19 through January 25, 2005.
Research Analysts' Future Price Targets Analysis. Deutsche Bank reviewed the 12-month price targets for Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock as projected in recent reports by analysts from seven financial institutions for each of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex. Such reports represent substantially all the research analysts' reports on Magnum Hunter and Cimarex that were reasonably available and current at the time the analyses were performed. These targets reflected each analyst's estimate of the future public market trading price of Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock at the end of the particular period considered for each estimate. Deutsche Bank then arrived at the present value for these targets using an estimated equity discount rate of 10.0%.
This analysis showed the following range of values for Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock:
12 month analysts' price target
| |
Nominal |
Present value |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | $13.00 - $16.50 | $11.82 - $15.00 | ||
| Cimarex | 27.00 - 46.00 | 24.55 - 41.82 |
I-68
The range of exchange ratios implied by this range of values for Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock is between 0.283x and 0.611x. The foregoing analysis was unaffected by the price movements in Magnum Hunter common stock from January 19 through January 25, 2005.
Comparable Companies Analysis. Deutsche Bank compared total enterprise value (calculated as equity value adjusted for capital structure) to estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which is referred to as EBITDA, for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex for the fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and based on First Call estimates. (Thomson Corporation compiles summaries of financial forecasts published by various investment banking firms. We refer to the information published by Thomson Corporation as First Call estimates.) Deutsche Bank then compared the EBITDA multiples obtained for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex with multiples obtained for groups of selected oil and gas companies. The selected oil and gas companies forming the group to which Magnum Hunter was compared were Newfield Exploration Company, Forest Oil Corporation, The Houston Exploration Company, Swift Energy Company and Comstock Resources, Inc. Deutsche Bank refers to those companies as the Magnum Hunter selected companies. The selected oil and gas companies forming the group to which Cimarex was compared were: Chesapeake Energy Corporation, The Houston Exploration Company, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Encore Acquisition Company, St. Mary Land & Exploration Company, and Comstock Resources, Inc. Deutsche Bank refers to those companies as the Cimarex selected companies. Deutsche Bank selected these companies because they are publicly traded companies with oil and gas operations that for purposes of this analysis may be considered similar to those of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex. The principal characteristics considered when selecting the comparable companies were oil / gas reserve mix, size and regional overlap of reserves.
The analysis showed the following multiples:
Total enterprise value / estimated EBITDA
| |
2004 |
2005 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | 5.7 | x | 4.8 | x | |
| Cimarex | 4.5 | 4.5 | |||
| Magnum Hunter selected companies median | 4.4 | 4.1 | |||
| Cimarex selected companies median | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company multiples (ranging between 4.5x and 5.5x for 2004 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA and between 4.0x and 5.0x for 2005 Total Enterprise Value/ EBITDA) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on publicly available estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company multiples (ranging between 4.3x and 4.8x for 2004 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA and between 3.8x and 4.3x for 2005 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on publicly available estimates. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the 2004 and 2005 Total Enterprise Value as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total enterprise value / EBITDA | 0.232x - 0.370x |
Deutsche Bank compared total enterprise value to EBITDA for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex for the fiscal years 2004 and 2005 based on estimates provided by management of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex. Deutsche Bank then applied the same comparable company multiples as used in the previous analysis (ranging between 4.5x and 5.5x for 2004 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA and between 4.0x and 5.0x for 2005 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on management estimates. Deutsche Bank applied the same comparable company multiples as used in
I-69
the previous analysis (ranging between 4.3x and 4.8x for 2004 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA and between 3.8x and 4.3x for 2005 Total Enterprise Value/EBITDA) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on management estimates. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting mean valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the 2004 and 2005 Total Enterprise Value as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total enterprise value / EBITDA | 0.274x - 0.424x |
Deutsche Bank calculated Price to Cash Flow per Share and Price to Earnings per Share multiples for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex for the fiscal years ended 2004 and 2005 based on First Call estimates. Deutsche Bank then compared these multiples with multiples obtained for the Magnum Hunter selected companies and the Cimarex selected companies.
The analysis showed the following multiples:
Price / Estimated CFPS
| |
2004 |
2005 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | 4.4 | x | 3.4 | x | |
| Cimarex | 5.1 | 5.2 | |||
| Magnum Hunter selected companies median | 3.8 | 3.6 | |||
| Cimarex selected companies median | 4.4 | 3.7 |
Price / Estimated EPS
| |
2004 |
2005 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | 11.9 | x | 9.2 | x | |
| Cimarex | 11.5 | 12.6 | |||
| Magnum Hunter selected companies median | 11.2 | 10.2 | |||
| Cimarex selected companies median | 11.9 | 10.2 |
Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company multiples (ranging between 3.5x and 4.0x for 2004 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 3.2x and 3.7x for 2005 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 10.5x and 11.5x for 2004 Price/Earnings per share; and between 9.0x and 10.0x for 2005 Price/Earnings per share) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on First Call estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company multiples (ranging between 4.9x and 5.4x for 2004 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 4.2x and 4.7x for 2005 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 11.5x and 12.5x for 2004 Price/ Earnings per share; and between 10.0x and 12.0x for 2005 Price/Earnings per share) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on First Call estimates. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting mean valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the 2004 and 2005 Price/Earnings per Share and Price/Cash Flow per Share analysis as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price / cash flow per share | 0.296x - 0.377 | x | |
| Price / earnings per share | 0.307 - 0.386 |
Deutsche Bank calculated Price to Cash Flow per Share and Price to Earnings per Share multiples for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex for the fiscal years ended 2004 and 2005 based on Magnum Hunter's and Cimarex's respective management estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied the same comparable company multiples as used in the previous analysis (ranging between 3.5x and 4.0x for 2004 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 3.2x and 3.7x for 2005 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 10.5x and 11.5x for
I-70
2004 Price/Earnings per share; and between 9.0x and 10.0x for 2005 Price/Earnings per share) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on management estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied the same comparable company multiples as used in the previous analysis (ranging between 4.9x and 5.4x for 2004 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 4.2x and 4.7x for 2005 Price/Cash Flow per share; between 11.5x and 12.5x for 2004 Price/Earnings per share; and between 10.0x and 12.0x for 2005 Price/Earnings per share) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on management estimates. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting mean valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the 2004 and 2005 Price/Earnings per Share and Price/Cash Flow per Share analysis as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price / cash flow per share | 0.311x - 0.397 | x | |
| Price / earnings per share | 0.300 - 0.377 |
Deutsche Bank also calculated Total Enterprise Value to thousand cubic foot of gas equivalent proved reserves values for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex based on the most recently publicly disclosed amount of proved reserves available, adjusted for acquisitions and divestitures. Deutsche Bank then compared the Total Enterprise Value to proved reserves values obtained for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex with results obtained for the Magnum Hunter selected companies and the Cimarex selected companies.
The analysis showed the following results:
| |
Total enterprise value / proved reserves (Mcfe) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | $ | 1.85 | |
| Cimarex | 3.78 | ||
| Magnum Hunter selected companies median | 1.95 | ||
| Cimarex selected companies median | 1.85 | ||
Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company values (ranging between $1.65 and $1.95 for Total Enterprise Value/proved reserves) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on publicly disclosed estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company values (ranging between $2.10 and $2.35 for Total Enterprise Value/proved reserves) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on publicly available estimates. Cimarex's reserve estimate was increased by 20% to attempt to adjust Cimarex's reserves due to its policy of typically not including proved undeveloped reserves in its reserves estimates. The 20% increase represents research analyst estimates of Cimarex's proved reserves if Cimarex were to include proved undeveloped reserves in its reserve estimates in a manner consistent with the comparable companies. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the Total Enterprise Value as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total enterprise value / Proved reserves (Mcfe) | 0.365x - 0.530x |
Deutsche Bank calculated Total Enterprise Value to 2005 estimated thousand cubic foot of gas equivalent production per day values for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex as provided in recent reports by analysts from four financial institutions for Magnum Hunter and three financial institutions for Cimarex. Such reports represent substantially all the research analysts' reports which contained production estimates on Magnum Hunter and Cimarex that were reasonably available and current at the time the analyses were performed. Deutsche Bank then compared the Total Enterprise Value to 2005 daily production values obtained for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex with results obtained for the Magnum Hunter selected companies and the Cimarex selected companies.
I-71
The analysis showed the following results:
| |
Total enterprise value / production (Mcfe/day) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter | $ | 7,087 | |
| Cimarex | 7,237 | ||
| Magnum Hunter selected companies median | 6,320 | ||
| Cimarex selected companies median | 7,087 | ||
Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company values (ranging between $6,000 and $6,700 for Total Enterprise Value/2005 daily production) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on analyst estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company values (ranging between $6,500 and $7,800 for Total Enterprise Value/2005 production) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on analyst estimates. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the Total Enterprise Value as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total enterprise value / 2005 Daily Production (Mcfe/day) | 0.237x - 0.339x |
Deutsche Bank calculated Total Enterprise Value to 2005 estimated thousand cubic foot of gas equivalent production per day values for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex projected by the managements of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company values (ranging between $6,000 and $6,700 for Total Enterprise Value/2005 daily production) to the corresponding Magnum Hunter statistics based on Magnum Hunter management estimates. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable company values (ranging between $6,500 and $7,800 for Total Enterprise Value/2005 production) to the corresponding Cimarex statistics based on Cimarex management estimates. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices derived from the Total Enterprise Value as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total enterprise value / 2005 Daily Production (Mcfe/day) | 0.235x - 0.335x |
Pro Forma Contribution Analysis. Deutsche Bank compared the pro forma contributions of each of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex to the combined company, based on First Call estimates and based on management estimates from both Magnum Hunter and Cimarex. Deutsche Bank reviewed pro forma estimates of earnings, cash flow and EBITDA for the years 2004 and 2005. Deutsche Bank also compared the contribution to pro forma total net asset value and pro forma proved developed net asset value that each of the companies provide. Magnum Hunter's total net asset value was calculated as the sum of the projected, discounted cash flows from Magnum Hunter's risked proved, probable and possible reserve base, a projected exploration program and midstream and oilfield service assets less total net debt. Risking assumptions were based on Deutsche Bank precedent experience confirmed as reasonable by Magnum Hunter's management. The exploration program was based upon production, operating and capital cost estimates provided by Magnum Hunter's management. Cimarex's total net asset value was calculated as the sum of the projected, discounted cash flows from Cimarex's total proved reserve base, and projected risked drilling program plus total net cash. The drilling program for 2005, including risking associated with that program, was provided by Cimarex management. This program was used by Deutsche Bank as the basis for the exploration program in 2006 and 2007. The assumptions underlying the exploration program were deemed reasonable by Cimarex management. Magnum Hunter's proved developed net asset value was calculated as the sum of the projected, discounted cash flows from Magnum Hunter's proved developed reserve base and midstream and
I-72
oilfield service assets less net debt. Net debt was adjusted by the ratio of proved developed reserves to total proved reserves. Cimarex's proved developed net asset value was calculated as the sum of the projected, discounted cash flows from Cimarex's proved developed reserve base plus net cash. Net cash was adjusted by the ratio of proved developed reserves to total proved reserves.
As more fully described in the table below, Magnum Hunter and Cimarex will contribute to the combined company in a manner consistent with the participation that Magnum Hunter stockholders and Cimarex stockholders will have in the ownership of Cimarex following the merger, as such participation is implied by the agreed 0.415 exchange ratio:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative Ownership Based On Exchange Ratio |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Cash Flow |
Net Income |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| |
Total Net Asset Value |
Proved Developed Net Asset Value |
Pre-Transaction Equity Value |
||||||||||||||
| |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
| Magnum Hunter—First | |||||||||||||||||
| Call Projections | 45 | % | 51 | % | 40 | % | 49 | % | 42 | % | 39 | % | 41 | % | 47 | % | |
| Cimarex—First Call Projections | 55 | 49 | 60 | 51 | 58 | 61 | 59 | 53 | |||||||||
| Magnum Hunter—Management Projections | 47 | 52 | 40 | 49 | 42 | 39 | 41 | 47 | |||||||||
| Cimarex—Management Projections | 53 | 48 | 60 | 51 | 58 | 61 | 59 | 53 | |||||||||
Pro Forma Earnings, Cash Flow and Credit Impact Analysis. Deutsche Bank analyzed the pro forma effects of the merger and computed the resulting accretion/dilution to the combined company's projected per-share earnings and cash flow during 2005, based on the agreed exchange ratio.
Deutsche Bank also computed the resulting credit statistics for the combined company based on the agreed exchange ratio, including total debt to book capitalization, total debt to last twelve months' (LTM) EBITDA, LTM EBITDA to interest expense, total debt to thousand cubic foot of gas equivalent proved reserves and total debt to thousand cubic foot of gas equivalent proved developed reserves. In one analysis, these computations used earnings and cash flow projections for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex based on First Call estimates, and in the second analysis, these computations used earnings and cash flow projections for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex based on estimates provided by Magnum Hunter and Cimarex management. In both analyses, the computations used preliminary synergy estimates and certain purchase accounting adjustments provided by Cimarex's management.
The analysis indicated that, based on First Call estimates and management estimates, the merger would be dilutive to estimated earnings per share in 2005 of Cimarex as compared to the same estimates for Cimarex on a stand-alone basis. Based on First Call estimates and management estimates, the merger would be accretive to cash flow per share for Cimarex in 2005, as compared to the same estimates for Cimarex on a stand-alone basis. In addition, the analysis indicated that, based on First Call estimates, the merger should have a positive impact on the credit statistics of the combined company as compared to Magnum Hunter on a stand-alone basis.
Precedent Transactions Analysis. Deutsche Bank examined 34 selected precedent business combination transactions which, for the purposes of its analysis, it deemed to be comparable to the merger in whole or in part. These 34 transactions included 16 transactions with consideration consisting of all stock and 18 transactions with consideration consisting of all or some portion of cash proceeds. The all-stock transactions included all significant transactions between publicly traded exploration and production companies since 1997. The cash or cash and stock transactions included all significant transactions between publicly traded exploration and production companies since 2001. Deutsche Bank calculated the premium received to the share price one day, one week and one month prior to announcement in these selected precedent transactions and then calculated the median value premium of the transactions. The calculated median premium for these two groupings of transactions over the three examined time periods are shown in the table below.
I-73
Premium to unaffected stock price
| |
1 day prior stock price |
1 week prior stock price |
1 month prior stock price |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median—all stock transactions | 11 | % | 10 | % | 10 | % | |
| Median—cash or cash & stock transactions | 23 | % | 24 | % | 31 | % |
Based on closing stock prices on January 19, 2005, the value implied to Magnum Hunter based on the 0.415 exchange ratio was a 23.6% premium.
Deutsche Bank then applied comparable transaction premium values (ranging between 5% and 25%) to the Magnum Hunter closing stock price on January 19, 2005. Deutsche Bank then applied comparable transaction premium values (ranging between 5% and 25%) to the corresponding Cimarex closing stock price on January 19, 2005. The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex share prices as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Comparable transaction analysis | 0.282x - 0.400x |
The precedent stock for stock transactions examined were:
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / Westport Resources Corporation
- •
- Plains
Exploration & Production Company / Nuevo Energy Company
- •
- Devon
Energy Corporation / Ocean Energy, Inc.
- •
- Newfield
Exploration Company / EEX Corporation
- •
- PanCanadian
Energy Corporation / Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- •
- Westport
Resources Corporation / Belco Oil & Gas Corp.
- •
- Stone
Energy Corporation / Basin Exploration, Inc.
- •
- Forest
Oil Corporation / Forcenergy Inc.
- •
- Devon
Energy Corporation / Santa Fe Snyder Corporation
- •
- Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation / Union Pacific Resources Group Inc.
- •
- Devon
Energy Corporation / PennzEnergy Company
- •
- Santa
Fe Energy Resources, Inc. / Snyder Oil Corporation
- •
- Ocean
Energy, Inc. / Seagull Energy Corporation
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / Oryx Energy Company
- •
- Ocean
Energy, Inc. / United Meridian Corporation
- •
- Burlington Resources Inc. / The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company
The precedent cash or cash and stock transactions examined were:
- •
- Noble
Energy, Inc. / Patina Oil & Gas Corporation
- •
- Petro-Canada
/ Prima Energy Corporation
- •
- Forest
Oil Corporation / The Wiser Oil Company
- •
- Pioneer Natural Resources Company / Evergreen Resources, Inc.
I-74
- •
- EnCana
Corporation / Tom Brown, Inc.
- •
- Canadian
Natural Resources Limited / Rio Alto Exploration Ltd.
- •
- Royal
Dutch-Shell Group / Enterprise Oil plc
- •
- Magnum
Hunter Resources, Inc. / Prize Energy Corporation
- •
- Burlington
Resources Inc. / Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- •
- Dominion
Resources, Inc. / Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp.
- •
- Devon
Energy Corporation / Anderson Exploration Ltd.
- •
- Devon
Energy Corporation / Mitchell Energy & Development Corp.
- •
- Amerada
Hess Corporation / Triton Energy Limited
- •
- Hunt
Oil Company / Chieftain International, Inc.
- •
- Conoco Inc.
/ Gulf Canada Resources, Ltd.
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / HS Resources, Inc.
- •
- The
Williams Companies, Inc. / Barrett Resources Corporation
- •
- Vintage Petroleum, Inc. / Genesis Exploration Ltd.
Deutsche Bank analyzed transaction multiples for eight of the precedent transactions and compared these multiples to those implied by the transaction value at January 19, 2005. The multiples calculated included total enterprise value to EBITDA, equity value to earnings and equity value to cash flow and total enterprise value to thousand cubic foot of gas equivalent proved reserves values (based on the most recently publicly disclosed amount of proved reserves available, adjusted for acquisitions and divestitures). These multiples were calculated based on actual LTM results and First Call estimates for the fiscal year of the transaction (FY+1) and the year following the year of the transaction (FY+2).
| |
Total enterprise value / EBITDA |
Equity value / net income |
Equity value / cash flow |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Total Enterprise value / Reserves |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |
LTM |
FY + 1 |
FY + 2 |
LTM |
FY + 1 |
FY + 2 |
LTM |
FY + 1 |
FY + 2 |
||||||||||||
| Precedent Transaction Median Multiples | 7.7 | x | 5.7 | x | 6.1 | x | 21.4 | x | 18.7 | x | 17.2 | x | 5.8 | x | 5.4 | x | 5.7 | x | $ | 1.81 | |
| Magnum Hunter / Cimarex Transaction | 8.0 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 18.7 | 15.2 | 11.7 | 6.1 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 2.18 | |||||||||||
The transactions used for this analysis consist of the significant exploration and production transactions between publicly traded companies announced since 2003. This time period was selected as these transactions occurred during a commodity price environment which is comparable to the existing commodity price environment. They include the following:
- •
- Noble
Energy, Inc. / Patina Oil and Gas Corporation
- •
- Petro-Canada
/ Prima Energy Corporation
- •
- Forest
Oil Corporation / The Wiser Oil Company
- •
- Pioneer
Natural Resources Company / Evergreen Resources, Inc.
- •
- EnCana
Corporation / Tom Brown, Inc.
- •
- Kerr-McGee
Corporation / Westport Resources Corporation
- •
- Plains
Exploration & Production Company / Nuevo Energy Company
- •
- Devon Energy Corporation / Ocean Energy, Inc.
I-75
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Deutsche Bank performed a discounted cash flow analysis for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex.
Deutsche Bank calculated the discounted cash flow values for Magnum Hunter as the sum of the net present value of:
- •
- the
estimated future cash flow that Magnum Hunter will generate starting in the fourth quarter of 2004 through 2018, plus
- •
- the value of Magnum Hunter at the end of that period.
Deutsche Bank estimated the present value of the future cash flows expected to be generated by Magnum Hunter's risked proved, probable and possible reserve base, in addition to the cash flows expected to be generated by reserves added through near-term exploration and development, and cash flows generated from Magnum Hunter's midstream and oilfield service operations. Risking assumptions are based on Deutsche Bank precedent experience confirmed as reasonable by Magnum Hunter management. Production and cost estimates were provided by Magnum Hunter management. Cash flow projections were generated starting in the fourth quarter of 2004 and ending in 2018. The terminal value of Magnum Hunter was based on projected residual values of Magnum Hunter's oil and gas reserves plus projected, annual oilfield service and midstream cash flow. Deutsche Bank used discount rates ranging from 8% to 10% and NYMEX commodity futures prices and First Call commodity price decks as of January 19, 2005.
Deutsche Bank calculated the discounted cash flow values for Cimarex as the sum of the net present value of
- •
- the
estimated future cash flow that Cimarex will generate from the fourth quarter of 2004 through 2018, plus
- •
- the value of Cimarex at the end of that period.
Deutsche Bank estimated the present value of the future cash flows expected to be generated by Cimarex's existing proved reserve base, in addition to the cash flows expected to be generated by reserves added through near-term exploration and development. Production and cost estimates were based upon Cimarex management's 2005 financial projections and risked drilling program. Assumptions associated with projections beyond 2005 were reviewed for reasonableness by Cimarex management. Cash flow projections were generated starting in the fourth quarter of 2004 and ending in 2018. The terminal values of Cimarex were based on projected residual values of Cimarex's oil and gas reserves. Deutsche Bank used discount rates ranging from 8% to 10% and NYMEX commodity futures prices and First Call commodity price decks as of January 19, 2005.
The following table presents the range of exchange ratios implied by the resulting valuation range based on implied Magnum Hunter and Cimarex discounted cash flow valuations as computed by Deutsche Bank.
| |
Exchange ratio range |
|
|---|---|---|
| Discounted cash flow analysis | 0.276x - 0.419x |
General
In connection with the review of the merger by Magnum Hunter's board of directors, Deutsche Bank performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Deutsche Bank considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole and did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it. Furthermore, Deutsche Bank believes that the summary provided and the analyses
I-76
described above must be considered as a whole and that selecting any portion of its analyses, without considering all of them, would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion. In addition, Deutsche Bank may have given various analyses and factors more or less weight than other analyses and factors and may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions, so that the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis described above should not be taken to be Deutsche Bank's view of the actual value of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex.
In performing its analyses, Deutsche Bank made numerous assumptions with respect to industry risks associated with reserves, industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex. Any estimates contained in Deutsche Bank's analyses are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by such estimates. The analyses performed were prepared solely as part of Deutsche Bank's analysis of the fairness from a financial point of view to Magnum Hunter common stockholders of the 0.415 exchange ratio and were prepared in connection with the delivery by Deutsche Bank of its opinion, dated January 25, 2005, to Magnum Hunter's board of directors. The analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which Magnum Hunter common stock or Cimarex common stock might trade following announcement of the merger or the prices at which Cimarex common stock might trade following consummation of the merger.
The terms of the merger were determined through arm's length negotiations between Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and were unanimously approved by Magnum Hunter's and Cimarex's boards of directors. Deutsche Bank did not recommend any specific exchange ratio or form of consideration to Magnum Hunter or that any specific exchange ratio or form of consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the merger. Deutsche Bank's opinion was provided to Magnum Hunter's board of directors to assist it in its consideration of the exchange ratio in the merger. Deutsche Bank's opinion does not address any other aspect of the proposed merger and does constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how to vote or to take any other action with respect to the merger. Deutsche Bank's opinion was one of the many factors taken into consideration by Magnum Hunter's board of directors in making its unanimous determination to approve the merger agreement. Deutsche Bank's analyses summarized above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of Magnum Hunter's board of directors with respect to the value of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex or of whether Magnum Hunter's board of directors would have been willing to agree to a different exchange ratio or form of consideration.
Magnum Hunter selected Deutsche Bank as financial advisor in connection with the merger based on Deutsche Bank's qualifications, expertise, reputation and experience in mergers and acquisitions. Pursuant to the engagement letter between Magnum Hunter and Deutsche Bank, Magnum Hunter agreed to pay Deutsche Bank a fee calculated as a percentage of the aggregate transaction value of the merger as of the closing date. Based on the closing prices of Magnum Hunter's and Cimarex's common stock on February 3, 2005, Deutsche Bank's fee would be approximately $6.1 million for services rendered by Deutsche Bank in connection with the merger, including Deutsche Bank's delivery of its opinion, all of which is contingent upon consummation of the merger. Magnum Hunter has also agreed to reimburse Deutsche Bank for its expenses incurred in performing its services. In addition, Magnum Hunter has agreed to indemnify Deutsche Bank and its affiliates, their respective directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if any, controlling Deutsche Bank or any of its affiliates against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws, related to or arising out of Deutsche Bank's engagement and any related transactions.
I-77
Opinions of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
On January 25, 2005, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated delivered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in a written opinion dated January 25, 2005, to the board of directors of Magnum Hunter to the effect that, as of that date and based upon the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of review set forth in its written opinion, the exchange ratio of 0.415 pursuant to the proposed merger was fair from a financial point of view to the holders of Magnum Hunter common stock. A copy of Merrill Lynch's written opinion is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex D.
Merrill Lynch's written opinion sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the scope of review undertaken by Merrill Lynch. Each holder of Magnum Hunter common stock is encouraged to read Merrill Lynch's opinion in its entirety. Merrill Lynch's opinion was intended for the use and benefit of the board of directors of Magnum Hunter, does not address the merits of the underlying decision by Magnum Hunter to engage in the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how that stockholder should vote on the merger or any related matter. This summary of Merrill Lynch's opinion is qualified by reference to the full text of the opinion attached as Annex D.
In arriving at its opinion, Merrill Lynch, among other things:
- •
- Reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information relating to Magnum Hunter and Cimarex that it deemed to be relevant;
- •
- Reviewed
certain information, including financial forecasts, relating to the business, earnings, cash flow, assets, liabilities and prospects of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex
furnished to it by Magnum Hunter and Cimarex, respectively;
- •
- Reviewed
certain proved reserve data of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex as well as information relating to potential future drilling sites and the probable and possible reserves;
- •
- Conducted
discussions with members of senior management and representatives of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex concerning the matters described in the three bullet points above,
as well as their respective businesses and prospects before and after giving effect to the merger;
- •
- Reviewed
the market prices and valuation multiples for Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock and compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies
that it deemed to be relevant;
- •
- Reviewed
the results of operations of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies that it deemed to be relevant;
- •
- Compared
the proposed financial terms of the merger with the financial terms of certain other transactions that it deemed to be relevant;
- •
- Participated
in certain discussions and negotiations among representatives of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and their financial and legal advisors;
- •
- Reviewed
the potential pro forma impact of the merger;
- •
- Reviewed
the merger agreement; and
- •
- Reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and took into account such other matters as it deemed necessary, including its assessment of general economic, market and monetary conditions.
I-78
In preparing its opinion, Merrill Lynch assumed and relied on the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made available to Merrill Lynch, discussed with or reviewed by or for Merrill Lynch, or publicly available, and did not assume any responsibility for independently verifying such information or undertaking an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex and was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal (other than the reserve data referred to above), nor did Merrill Lynch evaluate the solvency or fair value of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In addition, Merrill Lynch has not assumed any obligation to conduct any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex. With respect to the financial forecast information furnished to or discussed with Merrill Lynch by Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, Merrill Lynch assumed that such information was reasonably prepared and reflected the best currently available estimates and judgment of Magnum Hunter's or Cimarex's management as to the expected future financial performance of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, as the case may be. Merrill Lynch further assumed that the merger would qualify as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The opinion of Merrill Lynch was necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on, and on the information made available to Merrill Lynch as of, the date of its opinion. Merrill Lynch assumed that in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or other consents or approvals (contractual or otherwise) for the merger, no restrictions, including any divestiture requirements or amendments or modifications, would be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on the contemplated benefits of the merger.
The Merrill Lynch opinion does not address the merits of the underlying decision by Magnum Hunter to engage in the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote on the proposed merger or any matter related thereto. In addition, Merrill Lynch was not asked to address nor does its opinion address the fairness to, or any other consideration of, the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Magnum Hunter, other than the holders of Magnum Hunter common stock.
The following is a summary of the material financial and comparative analyses performed by Merrill Lynch that were presented to Magnum Hunter's board of directors in connection with its opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Merrill Lynch's financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data described below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Merrill Lynch's financial analyses.
Analysis of Magnum Hunter
Comparable Public Companies Analysis. Using publicly available information, Merrill Lynch compared certain financial and operating information and ratios for Magnum Hunter with corresponding financial and operating information and ratios for the following fourteen independent oil and gas exploration and production companies:
- •
- Cabot
Oil & Gas Corporation;
- •
- Cimarex
Energy Co.;
- •
- Denbury
Resources Inc.;
- •
- Encore
Acquisition Company;
- •
- Forest Oil Corporation;
I-79
- •
- The
Houston Exploration Company;
- •
- Newfield
Exploration Company;
- •
- Noble
Energy, Inc.;
- •
- Plains
Exploration & Production Company;
- •
- Pogo
Producing Company;
- •
- Spinnaker
Exploration Company;
- •
- St.
Mary Land & Exploration Company;
- •
- Stone
Energy Corporation; and
- •
- Vintage Petroleum, Inc.
Merrill Lynch reviewed:
- •
- the
ratio of the equity value to projected 2005 discretionary cash flow per share, which is referred to below as "Equity value/2005E CFPS";
- •
- the
ratio of the enterprise value, which is defined as equity value plus total long term debt minus cash plus liquidation preference of preferred stock plus minority
interest, to projected 2005 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which is referred to below as "Enterprise value/2005E EBITDA";
- •
- the
ratio of the enterprise value to the pro forma year end 2003 quantity of estimated proven reserves (adjusted for acquisitions) on a dollars per thousand cubic feet
equivalent (assuming a conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil), which is referred to below as "Enterprise value/proven reserves ($/Mcfe)"; and
- •
- the ratio of the enterprise value to the most recently disclosed projected 2005 net daily production on a dollars per thousand cubic feet equivalent per day (assuming a conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil), which is referred to below as "Enterprise value/2005E daily production ($/Mcfe/d)".
This analysis indicated the following:
Magnum Hunter Comparable Public Companies Analysis
| Benchmark |
High |
Low |
Mean |
Median |
Reference Range |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity value/2005E CFPS | 6.8x | 2.8x | 4.5x | 4.0x | 3.5x - 4.0x | |||||||||
| Enterprise value/2005E EBITDA | 6.7x | 2.7x | 4.6x | 4.4x | 4.5x - 5.0x | |||||||||
| Enterprise value/proven reserves ($/Mcfe) | $ | 3.71 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 1.89 | $1.90 - $2.10 | |||||
| Enterprise value/2005E daily production ($/Mcfe/d) | $ | 8,771 | $ | 4,044 | $ | 6,273 | $ | 6,004 | $6,500 - $7,000 | |||||
Using the reference ranges described above, this analysis indicated a range of implied enterprise values of Magnum Hunter of approximately $1.80 billion to $2.00 billion and implied prices per share of Magnum Hunter common stock of approximately $12.37 to $14.58 (based upon 90.6 million diluted shares outstanding and $680.0 million of net debt), compared to the implied value of the consideration to be received in the merger of $16.55, based upon the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87 and the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415.
I-80
Comparable Transaction Analysis. Using publicly available information, Merrill Lynch examined the following eleven selected transactions in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. The transactions considered and the date each transaction was announced were as follows:
| Buyer/Seller |
Date Announced |
|
|---|---|---|
| Noble Energy, Inc./Patina Oil & Gas Corporation | 12/16/04 | |
| Newfield Exploration Company/Inland Resources Inc. | 8/6/04 | |
| Affiliate of Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund II, L.P./Belden & Blake Corporation | 6/17/04 | |
| Petro-Canada/Prima Energy Corporation | 6/9/04 | |
| Forest Oil Corporation/The Wiser Oil Company | 5/23/04 | |
| Pioneer Natural Resources Company/Evergreen Resources, Inc. | 5/4/04 | |
| EnCana Corporation/Tom Brown, Inc. | 4/15/04 | |
| Kerr-McGee/Westport Resources Corporation | 4/7/04 | |
| Plains Exploration & Production Company/Nuevo Energy Company | 2/12/04 | |
| Devon Energy Corporation/Ocean Energy, Inc. | 2/24/03 | |
| Plains Exploration & Production Company/3TEC Energy Corporation | 2/3/03 |
Merrill Lynch reviewed:
- •
- the
ratio of the transaction value to latest-twelve-month earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which is referred to below as "Transaction
Value/LTM EBITDA";
- •
- the
ratio of the transaction value to the quantity of estimated proven reserves on a dollars per thousand cubic feet equivalent (assuming a conversion ratio of six thousand
cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil), which is referred to below as "Transaction Value/Reserves ($/Mcfe)";
- •
- the ratio of the transaction value to net daily production on a dollars per thousand cubic feet equivalent per day (assuming a conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil), which is referred to below as "Transaction Value/Production ($/Mcfe/d)";
The analysis indicated the following:
Magnum Hunter Comparable Transaction Analysis
| Benchmark |
High |
Low |
Average |
2004 Average |
2003 Average |
Reference Range |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Value/LTM EBITDA | 13.6x | 5.0x | 7.3x | 7.2x | 7.8x | 6.0x - 6.5x | |||||||||||
| Transaction Value/Reserves ($/Mcfe) | $ | 3.64 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.47 | $1.85 - $2.15 | ||||||
| Transaction Value/Production ($/Mcfe/d) | $ | 12,838 | $ | 3,119 | $ | 7,127 | $ | 7,571 | $ | 5,350 | $7,500 - $8,500 | ||||||
This analysis indicated a range of implied enterprise values of Magnum Hunter of approximately $1.85 billion to $2.05 billion, and implied prices per share of Magnum Hunter common stock of approximately $12.92 to $15.13 (based upon 90.6 million diluted shares outstanding and $680.0 million of net debt), compared to the implied value of the consideration to be received in the merger of $16.55, based upon the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87 and the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415.
I-81
Merger Premium Analysis. Merrill Lynch reviewed the premiums paid in the following eleven stock-for-stock business combinations in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. The transactions considered, including the date each transaction was announced, were as follows:
| Buyer/Seller |
Date Announced |
|
|---|---|---|
| Kerr-McGee/Westport Resources Corporation | 4/7/04 | |
| Plains Exploration & Production Company/Nuevo Energy Company | 2/12/04 | |
| Devon Energy Corporation/Ocean Energy, Inc. | 2/24/03 | |
| Unocal Corporation/Pure Resources, Inc. | 8/21/02 | |
| Newfield Exploration Company/EEX Corporation | 5/29/02 | |
| PanCanadian Energy Corporation/Alberta Energy Company Ltd. | 1/27/02 | |
| Westport Resources Corporation/Belco Oil & Gas Corp. | 6/9/01 | |
| Stone Energy Corporation/Basin Exploration, Inc. | 10/30/00 | |
| Forest Oil Corporation/Forcenergy Inc. | 7/10/00 | |
| Devon Energy Corporation/Santa Fe Snyder Corporation | 5/26/00 | |
| Anadarko Petroleum Corporation/Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. | 4/3/00 |
For each transaction listed above, Merrill Lynch calculated the premium represented by the offer price over the target company's share price for the one day period prior to the transaction's announcement and the target company's average share price for the ten day and thirty day periods prior to the transaction's announcement. This analysis indicated the following:
Magnum Hunter Merger Premium Analysis
| Time Period (prior to transaction announcement) |
High Premium |
Low Premium |
Mean Premium |
Median Premium |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One day | 27.0 | % | (4.3 | %) | 11.4 | % | 10.7 | % | |
| 10 days | 37.0 | % | 1.1 | % | 14.7 | % | 11.5 | % | |
| 30 days | 56.1 | % | 4.8 | % | 18.4 | % | 11.9 | % |
Merrill Lynch used the mean historical premia and the closing price per share of Magnum Hunter common stock for the corresponding periods prior to the announcement of the merger, and adjusted the low end of the implied value per share downward to reflect no premium to the closing price per share of Magnum Hunter common stock one day prior to the announcement of the merger to take into account the fact that Magnum Hunter had publicly disclosed in October 2004 that it was exploring strategic alternatives. This analysis indicated a range of implied prices per share of Magnum Hunter common stock of approximately $13.15 to $14.90, compared to the implied value of the consideration to be received in the merger of $16.55, based upon the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87 and the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Merrill Lynch performed a discounted cash flow analysis for Magnum Hunter to estimate the net asset value of Magnum Hunter common stock. Using financial forecasts provided by Magnum Hunter management, Merrill Lynch discounted the projected after-tax cash flows from Magnum Hunter at rates ranging from 7% to 9%, and applied a risk weighting to the proved reserves, probable and possible and exploratory reserves that it deemed appropriate based upon its judgment. This analysis indicated a range of implied enterprise net asset values of Magnum Hunter of approximately $0.96 billion to $1.14 billion and implied values per share of Magnum Hunter common stock of approximately $10.60 to $12.57 (based upon 90.6 million diluted shares outstanding and $680.0 million of net debt), compared to the implied value of the consideration to be received in the merger of $16.55, based upon the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87 and the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415.
I-82
Historical Stock Performance. Merrill Lynch reviewed historical trading prices for Magnum Hunter common stock. This review indicated that during the one year period ending January 24, 2005, the Magnum Hunter common stock traded as low as $8.12 per share and as high as $13.82 per share, compared to the implied value of the consideration to be received in the merger of $16.55, based upon the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87 and the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415.
Analysis of Cimarex
Comparable Public Companies Analysis. Using publicly available information, Merrill Lynch compared certain financial and operating information and ratios for Cimarex with corresponding financial and operating information and ratios for the independent oil and gas exploration and production companies listed above under "—Analysis of Magnum Hunter—Comparable Public Companies Analysis," except that the group of companies used in this analysis included Magnum Hunter in the place of Cimarex.
Merrill Lynch reviewed:
- •
- the
ratio of the equity value to projected 2005 discretionary cash flow per share, which is referred to below as "Equity value/2005E CFPS";
- •
- the
ratio of the enterprise value to projected 2005 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which is referred to below as "Enterprise value/2005E
EBITDA";
- •
- the
ratio of the enterprise value to the pro forma year end 2003 quantity of estimated proven reserves (adjusted for acquisitions) on a dollars per thousand cubic feet
equivalent (assuming a conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil), which is referred to below as "Enterprise value/proven reserves ($/Mcfe)"; and
- •
- the ratio of the enterprise value to the most recently disclosed projected 2005 net daily production on a dollars per thousand cubic feet equivalent per day (assuming a conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil), which is referred to below as "Enterprise value/2005E daily production ($/Mcfe/d)".
This analysis indicated the following:
Cimarex Comparable Public Companies Analysis
| Benchmark |
High |
Low |
Mean |
Median |
Reference Range |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity value/2005E CFPS | 6.8x | 2.8x | 4.3x | 3.8x | 4.0x - 4.5x | |||||||||
| Enterprise value/2005E EBITDA | 6.7x | 2.7x | 4.6x | 4.4x | 4.5x - 5.0x | |||||||||
| Enterprise value/proven reserves ($/Mcfe) | $ | 3.55 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.89 | $1.90 - $2.10 | |||||
| Enterprise value/2005E daily production ($/Mcfe/d) | $ | 8,771 | $ | 4,044 | $ | 6,327 | $ | 6,004 | $6,500 - $7,000 | |||||
Using the reference ranges described above, this analysis indicated a range of implied enterprise values of Cimarex of approximately $1.30 billion to $1.50 billion, and implied prices per share of Cimarex common stock of approximately $31.86 to $36.44 (based upon 43.7 million diluted shares outstanding and ($92.2) million of net debt), compared to the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Merrill Lynch performed a discounted cash flow analysis for Cimarex to estimate the net asset value of Cimarex common stock. Using financial forecasts provided by Cimarex management, Merrill Lynch discounted the projected after-tax cash flows from Cimarex at rates ranging from 7% to 9%, and applied a risk weighting for proved developing producing, proved
I-83
developing non-producing, proved undeveloped reserves and unproven reserves that it deemed appropriate based upon its judgment. This analysis indicated a range of implied enterprise net asset values of Cimarex of $1.16 billion to $1.28 billion, and implied values per share of Cimarex common stock of approximately $26.53 to $29.23 (based upon 43.7 million diluted shares outstanding and ($92.2) million of net debt), compared to the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87.
Historical Stock Performance. Merrill Lynch reviewed historical trading prices for Cimarex common stock. This review indicated that during the one year period ending January 24, 2005, the Cimarex common stock traded as low as $24.05 per share and as high as $41.45 per share, compared to the closing price per share of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 of $39.87.
Exchange Ratio Analysis
Historical Implied Exchange Ratio Trading Analysis. Merrill Lynch reviewed the per share daily closing market prices of Magnum Hunter common stock and Cimarex common stock for the two year period ending January 24, 2005, and calculated the historical implied exchange ratios by dividing the daily closing prices of Magnum Hunter common stock by those of Cimarex common stock on January 24, 2005 and the average of those closing prices per share for the previous month, previous three months, previous six months, previous year, and previous two years. This analysis shows the following implied exchange ratios, in each compared to the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415:
| Period Ending January 24, 2005 |
Implied Exchange Ratio |
|
|---|---|---|
| January 24, 2005 | 0.330 | |
| Average previous 1 month | 0.336 | |
| Average previous 2 months | 0.341 | |
| Average previous 3 months | 0.338 | |
| Average previous year | 0.346 | |
| Average previous 2 years | 0.344 |
Contribution Analysis. In order to estimate the implied exchange ratio range based upon a contribution analysis, Merrill Lynch estimated the contribution of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex to the pro forma combined company on a percentage basis with respect to the following:
- •
- Equity
value;
- •
- Enterprise
value;
- •
- Proved
reserves, which is referred to below as "Proved Reserves";
- •
- Net
asset value, which was estimated for Magnum Hunter and Cimarex using the discounted cash flow methodologies for each company described above and discount rates ranging
for 7% to 9%;
- •
- 2004
estimated EBITDA, which is referred to below as "2004E EBITDA";
- •
- 2004
estimated net income, which is referred to below as "2004E net income";
- •
- 2004
estimated discretionary cash flow, which is referred to below as "2004E cash flow";
- •
- 2004
estimated net production, which is referred to below as "2004E production";
- •
- 2005
estimated EBITDA, which is referred to below as "2005E EBITDA";
- •
- 2005 estimated net income, which is referred to below as "2005E net income";
I-84
- •
- 2005
estimated discretionary cash flow, which is referred to below as "2005E cash flow"; and
- •
- 2005 estimated net production, which is referred to below as "2005E production."
Magnum Hunter's contributions to the pro forma combined company with respect to proved reserves, estimated net production and estimated EBITDA, which were all unleveraged measures, were adjusted to incorporate its net indebtedness of $680.0 million, which is referred to below as the "Magnum Hunter Leverage Adjusted Percentage Contribution." In addition, Cimarex reserves were adjusted upward by 20% to reflect proved undeveloped reserves in line with industry averages.
This analysis showed the following implied exchange ratios, in each case compared to the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415:
Relative Contribution Analysis
| Benchmark |
Magnum Hunter Percentage Contribution |
Magnum Hunter Leverage Adjusted Percentage Contribution |
Implied Exchange Ratio |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity value | 40.6 | 40.6 | 0.330 | |||
| Enterprise value | 53.1 | 40.6 | 0.330 | |||
| Proved reserves | 65.6 | 55.6 | 0.603 | |||
| Net asset value (7% discount rate) | 47.1 | 47.1 | 0.430 | |||
| Net asset value (8% discount rate) | 46.2 | 46.2 | 0.415 | |||
| Net asset value (9% discount rate) | 45.3 | 45.3 | 0.400 | |||
2004E EBITDA |
47.3 |
33.6 |
0.244 |
|||
| 2004E net income | 39.7 | 39.7 | 0.318 | |||
| 2004E cash flow | 46.2 | 46.2 | 0.414 | |||
| 2004E production | 52.5 | 39.8 | 0.319 | |||
2005E EBITDA |
53.9 |
41.5 |
0.342 |
|||
| 2005E net income | 49.4 | 49.4 | 0.470 | |||
| 2005E cash flow | 52.9 | 52.9 | 0.542 | |||
| 2005E production | 53.2 | 40.7 | 0.331 |
Pro Forma Analysis. Merrill Lynch analyzed the pro forma effect of the merger and estimated the resulting accretion/dilution to the combined company's projected per-share earnings and discretionary cash flow during 2005, based on the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger of 0.415.
This analysis indicated that, based on Magnum Hunter and Cimarex management estimates (including $5 million in pre-tax synergies in 2005 to be realized as a result of the merger), the merger would be dilutive to projected earnings per share in 2005 for the combined company as compared to the same estimates for Cimarex on a stand-alone basis, and accretive to projected discretionary cash flow per share for the combined company in 2005, as compared to the same estimates for Cimarex on a stand-alone basis.
The summary set forth above summarizes the material analyses performed by Merrill Lynch but does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Merrill Lynch in arriving at its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial or summary description. Accordingly, Merrill Lynch believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and the factors considered by Merrill Lynch, without considering all analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying the Merrill Lynch opinion. Merrill Lynch did not assign relative weights to any of its analyses in preparing its opinion. The matters considered by Merrill Lynch in its analyses were based on numerous macroeconomic, operating and financial assumptions with respect to industry
I-85
performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond Magnum Hunter's and Merrill Lynch's control and involve the application of complex methodologies and educated judgments. In addition, no company utilized as a comparison in the analyses described above is identical to Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, and none of the transactions utilized as a comparison is identical to the merger.
Magnum Hunter's board of directors selected Merrill Lynch to deliver its opinion because of Merrill Lynch's reputation as an internationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the merger and because Merrill Lynch is familiar with Magnum Hunter and its business. As part of Merrill Lynch's investment banking business, Merrill Lynch is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities and private placements.
Merrill Lynch acted as financial advisor to the Magnum Hunter in connection with the merger and has received or will receive total fees from Magnum Hunter in the amount of $3.65 million for its services, of which $1.55 million has already been paid and the remainder of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger. In addition, Magnum Hunter agreed to indemnify Merrill Lynch for certain liabilities arising out of its engagement and to reimburse Merrill Lynch for certain expenses incurred in connection with this engagement, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel. Merrill Lynch has, in the past, provided financial advisory services to Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and may continue to do so and has received, and may receive, fees for the rendering of such services. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Merrill Lynch may actively trade the Magnum Hunter common stock and other securities of Magnum Hunter, as well as the common stock of Cimarex and other securities of Cimarex, for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, Merrill Lynch may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
Magnum Hunter Common Stockholders
In the merger, holders of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will receive 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. This ratio is referred to as the exchange ratio. The exchange ratio will not be adjusted in the case of changes in the outstanding shares of Cimarex between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger. Magnum Hunter common stockholders will receive cash for any fractional shares which they would otherwise receive in the merger.
Magnum Hunter Series A Preferred Stockholders
In the merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 20 shares of Cimarex common stock. Based upon the 80,000 shares of Series A preferred stock currently outstanding, holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock would receive 0.00025 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Series A preferred stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. This ratio will not be adjusted in the case of changes in the outstanding shares of Cimarex between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger.
Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stockholders will receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger to the extent necessary. In the alternative, Cimarex may elect in its sole discretion
I-86
to offer Series A preferred stockholders who would otherwise receive fractional shares one or both of the following options:
- •
- the
right to purchase an additional fraction of a share of Cimarex common stock sufficient to provide the holder with a whole share, at the closing sales price of Cimarex
common stock on the NYSE on the day immediately before the holder's acceptance of this right; and/or
- •
- the establishment of an agency arrangement which combines fractional shares held by participating Series A preferred stockholders into whole shares, sells those shares for the account of the participating holders to a party other than Cimarex or its subsidiaries or affiliates, and then distributes the resulting sales proceeds to the participating holders in proportion to their contributed fractional share interests, with related transaction costs to be borne by Cimarex.
Cimarex may offer either or both of these alternatives to Series A preferred stockholders at any time until the third anniversary of the closing date of the merger. These provisions do not prevent Cimarex from offering other alternatives to Series A preferred stockholders who receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock. Cimarex is not permitted to force Series A preferred stockholders who receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock to receive cash in respect of their fractional shares.
Treatment of Magnum Hunter Stock Options
Magnum Hunter has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain consent to cancel options to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock from all holders of options that require consent for cancellation of the options. Magnum Hunter also will cause all stock options that do not require consent for cancellation to be canceled as of the effective time of the merger. As of April 15, 2005, the record date for the Magnum Hunter special meeting, Magnum Hunter had options to purchase 4,888,931 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock outstanding, with an average exercise price of approximately $8.05 per share. Magnum Hunter estimates that options covering 2,000 shares require consent for cancellation.
At the effective time of the merger, the holder of each canceled stock option will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the product of the total number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option (whether vested or unvested), times the excess, if any, of the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date over the exercise price of the option, less the amount of any required withholding taxes. Any cash payments to option holders will be made by Magnum Hunter or, at Cimarex's option, by Cimarex. Options with exercise prices higher than the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date will not be entitled to any cash payment. The closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on April 15, 2005, the record date for the Magnum Hunter special meeting, was $14.54. If the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock is the same on the day before the closing date of the merger, Magnum Hunter estimates that options to purchase 4,888,931 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will have an exercise price that is less than the closing price, and Magnum Hunter or Cimarex will be required to make an aggregate cash payment of approximately $31.8 million.
If Magnum Hunter does not receive consent before the effective time to cancel any options that require consent for cancellation, those options will be assumed by Cimarex. Assumed options will be converted into an option to purchase that number of shares of Cimarex common stock determined by multiplying the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option at the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio. The exercise price per share of each assumed option will be equal to the exercise price per share of the existing option divided by the exchange ratio. Each assumed option will remain subject to the same conditions that applied before the merger, except that each option will be fully vested.
I-87
Promptly following the effective time of the merger, Cimarex has agreed to cause the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon exercise of the assumed options to be registered with the SEC, and will use all reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of that registration statement for so long as any assumed options remain outstanding.
Distribution of TEL Offshore Trust Units
Magnum Hunter currently owns approximately 1.4 million trust units, which represents 29.1% of the outstanding trust units, of TEL Offshore Trust, some of which units are held indirectly through a subsidiary. Before the merger, Magnum Hunter's board of directors intends to cause its subsidiary to distribute the trust units to Magnum Hunter. Magnum Hunter's board of directors then intends to declare a distribution of the trust units to holders of Magnum Hunter common stock (other than Magnum Hunter and its subsidiaries) as of April 18, 2005, the distribution record date selected by the Magnum Hunter board. In the distribution, each holder of Magnum Hunter common stock will receive a percentage of TEL Offshore Trust units equal to the percentage of Magnum Hunter common stock it holds, and cash instead of any fractional units it would otherwise be entitled to receive.
Under the merger agreement, the distribution must:
- •
- be
declared at least ten days before the Magnum Hunter special meeting;
- •
- take
place on terms and conditions reasonably acceptable to Cimarex; and
- •
- be completed before the effective time of the merger.
Magnum Hunter may choose to distribute cash instead of the trust units to its common stockholders in any state if it determines the unit distribution in that state is unlikely to be completed before the effective time of the merger due to that state's securities laws or other regulatory requirements. The distribution of the TEL Offshore Trust units, or possibly cash instead of such units, prior to the merger is not a closing condition of the merger and, as a result, it is possible that holders of Magnum Hunter common stock may not receive a distribution of any kind. Magnum Hunter will withhold, as necessary, in order to satisfy its withholding tax obligations with respect to a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units, or possibly cash instead of such units (see relevant portions of the discussion under "—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" on page I-92).
TEL Offshore Trust's trust units are traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol "TELOZ." On January 25, 2005, the last full trading day on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market before the public announcement of the proposed merger, the closing price of TEL Offshore Trust's trust units was $10.97 per unit. On April 28, 2005, the most recent trading day practicable before the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the closing price of TEL Offshore Trust's trust units was $7.27 per unit.
Cimarex intends to account for the merger under the purchase method for business combinations, with Cimarex being deemed to have acquired Magnum Hunter. This means that the assets and liabilities of Magnum Hunter will be recorded, as of the closing of the merger, at their fair values and added to those of Cimarex.
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal
Common Stockholders
Holders of Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock are not entitled to dissenters' rights of appraisal under either Delaware law or Nevada law in connection with the merger.
I-88
Preferred Stockholders
Holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock are entitled to dissenters' rights of appraisal under Nevada Revised Statutes 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, in connection with the merger. The relevant statutory text is attached as Annex F to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
In order to exercise dissenters' rights under Nevada law, a holder of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock must deliver to Magnum Hunter, before the Magnum Hunter special meeting, written notice of its intent to demand payment for its shares if the merger is completed. The holder also must not vote in favor of the merger or consent to the merger in writing.
If the merger is completed, Magnum Hunter must send to each holder of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock who has provided the required notice of intent to dissent, and who has not voted for or consented to the merger, a notice containing the following information:
- •
- the
location where the demand for payment must be sent and where and when certificates for shares must be deposited;
- •
- a
copy of the applicable Nevada statute;
- •
- a
form for demanding payment; and
- •
- the date by which the surviving corporation must receive the demand for payment, which may not be less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the date the notice is delivered.
A dissenting holder who demands payment for its shares and deposits its stock certificates within the time specified, and who otherwise complies with the applicable statutory procedures under the Nevada Revised Statutes, will be entitled to receive a judicial determination of the fair value of its shares (exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger) and to receive payment of that fair value in cash, together with a fair rate of interest, if any. Any such judicial determination of the fair value of the shares could be based upon considerations other than or in addition to the value of the shares as determined under the merger agreement. Holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock should recognize that the value determined in an appraisal proceeding could be higher or lower than the merger consideration they would have received had they not exercised their dissenters' rights.
If any holder of Series A preferred stock who exercises dissenters' rights under Nevada Revised Statutes 92A.300 to 92A.500 fails to perfect, or effectively withdraws or loses its dissenters' rights as provided in the Nevada Revised Statutes, the shares held by such stockholder will be converted into the right to receive Cimarex common stock in accordance with the merger agreement.
Failure to follow the steps for perfecting dissenters' rights required by Nevada Revised Statutes 92A.300 to 92A.500 may result in the loss of those rights. Holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock who fail to notify Magnum Hunter before the Magnum Hunter special meeting of their intent to dissent, or who vote in favor of the merger agreement and the merger, will not be entitled to exercise dissenters' rights. Instead, they will receive Cimarex common stock in accordance with the merger agreement.
Federal Securities Laws Consequences; Stock Transfer Restrictions on Affiliates
Shares of Cimarex common stock issued in the merger will not be subject to any restrictions on transfer arising under the Securities Act, except for shares issued to any Magnum Hunter stockholder who may be deemed to be an "affiliate" of Magnum Hunter for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of Magnum Hunter for these purposes generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by or are under common control with, Magnum Hunter, and include directors, certain executive officers and principal stockholders of
I-89
Magnum Hunter. These affiliates may resell the shares of combined company common stock they receive in the merger only:
- •
- under
an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the resale of those shares;
- •
- in
transactions permitted by Rule 145(d) under the Securities Act; or
- •
- as otherwise permitted under the Securities Act.
We expect that each Magnum Hunter affiliate will agree not to transfer any Cimarex common stock received in the merger except in compliance with the resale provisions of Rule 144 or 145 under the Securities Act or as otherwise permitted under the Securities Act. The merger agreement requires Magnum Hunter to use its best efforts to cause its affiliates to enter into these agreements. Cimarex's registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part, does not cover resales of Cimarex common stock received by any person upon completion of the merger, and no person is authorized to make any use of this joint proxy statement/prospectus in connection with any such resale.
Regulatory Filings and Approvals Required to Complete the Merger
The merger is subject to the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, referred to as the HSR Act, which prevents transactions subject to its requirements from being consummated until the required notification forms and attachments are furnished to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and certain waiting periods expire or are terminated. On February 16, 2005, each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter made its initial HSR Act filing. The waiting period expired on March 17, 2005, 30 days from the date of the initial filings.
The Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission, however, are not legally precluded from challenging the merger on antitrust grounds after expiration of the HSR Act waiting period. Accordingly, at any time before or after the completion of the merger, either the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission could bring an action under the antitrust laws, including an injunction action, if deemed necessary to protect competition in any relevant market. Moreover, at any time before or after the completion of the merger, notwithstanding that the applicable waiting period may have expired or been terminated, any state or private party could challenge the merger under the antitrust laws, although a private plaintiff would need to establish that it had the requisite antitrust standing. There can be no assurance that a governmental or private challenge to the merger will not be made or that, if a challenge is made, the parties would prevail.
We are not aware of any other material governmental or regulatory approval required for completion of the merger, other than compliance with the applicable corporate law of the State of Delaware and the State of Nevada.
Legal Proceedings Related to the Merger
On March 17, 2005, a class action complaint was served on Magnum Hunter and each member of Magnum Hunter's board of directors. The complaint, which was filed in the Clark County District Court in the State of Nevada, alleges that Magnum Hunter's directors breached their fiduciary duties to Magnum Hunter's stockholders by failing to obtain adequate merger consideration in the proposed merger. The complaint also alleges that Magnum Hunter aided and abetted the directors' breaches. The complaint seeks to enjoin the merger and obtain appropriate compensatory damages for Magnum Hunter's stockholders.
Magnum Hunter and the other named defendants believe that the allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend the actions.
I-90
Magnum Hunter Rights Agreement
Magnum Hunter entered into a Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of January 6, 1998 with Securities Transfer Corporation, as rights agent. Under this agreement, Magnum Hunter effected a dividend distribution of stockholder rights that carry certain conversion rights in the event of a significant change in beneficial ownership of Magnum Hunter. One right is attached to each share of Magnum Hunter's outstanding common stock and is not detachable until such time as a person or group of affiliated or associated persons acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of Magnum Hunter's outstanding common stock. Such an acquisition is referred to in the rights agreement as a distribution date. Each right entitles each registered holder (excluding the acquiring person or group) to purchase from Magnum Hunter one one-hundredth of a share of Series A junior participating preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a purchase price of $35.00 per one one-hundredth of a share. In the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which Magnum Hunter common stock is exchanged, holders of the rights will be entitled to receive shares of the acquiring company's common stock valued at twice the exercise price of the right upon exercise. Upon a distribution date, Magnum Hunter may redeem the rights at a price of $0.01 per right. The rights will expire on June 1, 2010.
In connection with the proposed merger, Magnum Hunter and the rights agent amended the terms of the rights agreement so that the execution and delivery of the merger agreement and the closing of the merger will not constitute a distribution date. This means that holders of Magnum Hunter's common stock will not obtain the detachable rights in connection with the proposed merger.
Cimarex also has adopted a stockholder rights plan. See "—Description of Cimarex's Capital Stock—Stockholder Rights Plan" on page I-156.
New York Stock Exchange Listing of Cimarex Common Stock to be Issued in the Merger
Cimarex common stock currently is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "XEC." Cimarex has agreed in the merger agreement that it will cause the Cimarex common stock issuable in the merger to be approved for listing on the NYSE before the effective time of the merger. Listing of the shares of Cimarex common stock, subject to official notice of issuance, is a condition to the closing of the merger.
Delisting and Deregistration of Magnum Hunter Common Stock
Upon closing of the merger, all shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will be delisted from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act.
As of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, Magnum Hunter's outstanding indebtedness under its existing credit facility was $320 million and $220 million, respectively, having a borrowing base of $525 million. Cimarex intends to repay all indebtedness under Magnum Hunter's credit facility at the closing of the merger, using funds available to Cimarex at closing from Cimarex's credit facility. Cimarex is currently pursuing negotiations with its bank group, led by JPMorgan Chase, to amend or expand its existing facility to accommodate the payoff of Magnum Hunter's debt. At December 31, 2004, Cimarex's borrowing base under its existing facility was $300 million, all of which was undrawn. Cimarex anticipates that the covenants and other general terms of the new or amended facility will be substantially similar to the covenants and terms of its existing bank credit facility and that the new borrowing base will be approximately $800-850 million.
I-91
MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
The following is a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that are expected to be material to U.S. holders and to non-U.S. holders (as defined below) of Magnum Hunter common stock and Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exchange such stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger. This summary does not purport to be a complete technical analysis or listing of all potential tax consequences that may be relevant to Magnum Hunter stockholders. It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal or tax advice. For this reason, you are urged to consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of the merger to you. Further, this summary does not address any tax consequences arising under the income or other tax laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction or any tax treaties.
This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (referred to as the Code), the applicable regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department, and publicly available judicial and administrative rulings and decisions, all as in effect on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and any of which may change, possibly retroactively. Any such changes could affect the continuing validity of this summary.
For purposes of this summary, the term U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock, as applicable, who is:
- •
- an
individual who is a citizen of the United States or who is a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
- •
- a
corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or
the District of Columbia;
- •
- a
trust, if either (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have
the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or
- •
- an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its income regardless of its source.
For purposes of this summary, the term non-U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock, as applicable, that is not treated as a partnership (or as a partner in a partnership) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and that is not a U.S. holder. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partnership and its partners depends upon a variety of factors, including the activities of the partnership and the partners. If you are treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or as a partner in a partnership, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to you.
This summary assumes that you hold your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your particular circumstances or that may be applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including if you are:
- •
- a
financial institution or thrift;
- •
- a
tax-exempt organization;
- •
- an S corporation or other pass-through entity or an owner of an interest therein;
I-92
- •
- an
entity taxable as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or an owner of an interest therein;
- •
- an
insurance company;
- •
- a
mutual fund;
- •
- a
dealer in stocks and securities or foreign currencies;
- •
- a
trader or an investor in Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock who elects the mark-to-market method of
accounting for that stock;
- •
- a
stockholder who received Magnum Hunter common stock from the exercise of employee stock options, from an employee stock purchase plan or otherwise as compensation;
- •
- a
stockholder who received Magnum Hunter common stock from a tax-qualified retirement plan, individual retirement account or other qualified savings account;
- •
- a
U.S. holder that has a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar;
- •
- certain
expatriates and former long-term residents of the United States;
- •
- a
stockholder who holds Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock as part of a hedge against currency risk, straddle or a constructive sale
or conversion transaction, or other risk reduction or integrated investment transaction;
- •
- a
stockholder that is a non-U.S. holder and that holds its Magnum Hunter common stock in connection with a trade or business conducted in the United States or in
connection with an office or fixed place of business located in the United States;
- •
- a
stockholder that is a nonresident alien individual and that is present in the United States in the taxable year; or
- •
- a stockholder that is affected by the provisions of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party.
Further, this summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to any holder that actually or constructively owns both Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock, or to holders of options to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock, or to holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exercise appraisal rights.
This summary does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent upon, individual circumstances, including without limitation alternative minimum tax consequences. Moreover, it does not address any non-income tax or any foreign, state or local tax consequences of the merger. Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to you will depend upon the facts of your particular situation. Accordingly, you are strongly urged to consult with a tax advisor to determine the particular federal, state, local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the merger to you.
Magnum Hunter's Tax Opinions
Magnum Hunter has received a tax opinion from Thompson & Knight L.L.P. dated as of April 25, 2005 (referred to as the T&K Form S-4 tax opinion), and it is a waivable condition of the merger that Magnum Hunter receive another tax opinion from Thompson & Knight L.L.P. dated as of the closing
I-93
date of the merger (referred to as the T&K closing date tax opinion), which states, in each case, that for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
- •
- the
merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
- •
- each
of Cimarex, Merger Sub, and Magnum Hunter will be a party to that reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code;
- •
- no
gain or loss will be recognized by Cimarex, Merger Sub, or Magnum Hunter as a result of the merger;
- •
- no
gain or loss will be recognized by U.S. holders with respect to shares of Magnum Hunter common stock that are exchanged solely for Cimarex common stock in the merger,
except with respect to the amount of cash received instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock by U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock;
- •
- no
gain or loss should be recognized by U.S. holders with respect to shares of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that are exchanged solely for Cimarex common
stock in the merger, except with respect to any cash received by any U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exercise appraisal rights; and
- •
- no gain or loss will be recognized by non-U.S. holders with respect to shares of Magnum Hunter common stock that are exchanged solely for Cimarex common stock in the merger, provided such non-U.S. holders have not held (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's outstanding common stock at any time during the shorter of (1) the five-year period ending at the effective time of the merger or (2) the period during which such non-U.S. holders held such shares of Magnum Hunter common stock.
The T&K Form S-4 tax opinion is attached as Exhibit 8.2 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and also states that the discussion under this heading "Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" constitutes the opinion of Thompson & Knight L.L.P. as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to be material to U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exchange such stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger. For information on how to obtain a copy of exhibits filed with this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see the discussion under the heading "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page III-9.
The T&K Form S-4 tax opinion is based, and the T&K closing date tax opinion will be based, on the assumptions, conditions, qualifications, and limitations stated at the beginning of this discussion under the heading "—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger—General." In addition, the T&K Form S-4 tax opinion is based, and the T&K closing date tax opinion will be based, on specified additional assumptions, conditions, qualifications, and limitations, the material aspects of which are summarized below.
In rendering the T&K Form S-4 tax opinion Thompson & Knight L.L.P. has assumed, and in rendering the T&K closing date tax opinion Thompson & Knight L.L.P. will assume:
- •
- the validity and accuracy of the documents and corporate records that Thompson & Knight L.L.P. has examined and the facts and representations concerning the merger that have come to Thompson & Knight L.L.P.'s attention during its engagement with Magnum Hunter;
I-94
- •
- that
the merger will be consummated in the manner described in the merger agreement and the other agreements referenced in the merger agreement and as described in the
registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part;
- •
- that
the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement and in representation letters that have been received by Thompson & Knight L.L.P. from
Cimarex, Magnum Hunter, and Merger Sub were true, correct and complete when made and will continue to be true, correct and complete as of the effective time of the merger; and
- •
- that Cimarex, Magnum Hunter, and Merger Sub have complied with and, if applicable, will continue to comply with the covenants contained in the merger agreement.
The T&K Form S-4 tax opinion and the T&K closing date tax opinion will not bind the Internal Revenue Service, referred to as the IRS, or preclude it from challenging the conclusions set forth in those opinions, or preclude a court from adopting a contrary position. The T&K Form S-4 tax opinion is rendered as of April 25, 2005, and the T&K closing date tax opinion will be rendered as of the date thereof, and Thompson & Knight L.L.P. is under no obligation to supplement or revise its opinions after the date on which its opinions are rendered. Any change in the assumptions, conditions, qualifications, and limitations upon which the T&K Form S-4 tax opinion is based, or upon which the T&K closing date tax opinion will be based, could alter the conclusions reached in those opinions.
Cimarex's Tax Opinions
Cimarex has received a tax opinion from Holme Roberts & Owen LLP dated as of April 25, 2005 (referred to as the HRO Form S-4 tax opinion), and it is a waivable condition of the merger that Cimarex receive another tax opinion from Holme Roberts & Owen LLP dated as of the closing date of the merger (referred to as the HRO closing date tax opinion), which states, in each case, that for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
- •
- the
merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
- •
- each
of Cimarex, Merger Sub, and Magnum Hunter will be a party to that reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code; and
- •
- no gain or loss will be recognized by Cimarex, Merger Sub, or Magnum Hunter as a result of the merger.
The HRO Form S-4 tax opinion is attached as Exhibit 8.1 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and also states that the discussion under this heading "Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" constitutes the opinion of Holme Roberts & Owen LLP as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to be material to U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock that exchange such stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger. For information on how to obtain a copy of exhibits filed with this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see the discussion under the heading "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page III-9.
The HRO Form S-4 tax opinion is based, and the HRO closing date tax opinion will be based, on the assumptions, conditions, qualifications, and limitations stated at the beginning of this discussion under the heading "—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger—General." In addition, the HRO Form S-4 tax opinion is based, and the HRO closing date tax opinion will be based, on specified additional assumptions, conditions, qualifications, and limitations, the material aspects of which are summarized below.
I-95
In rendering the HRO Form S-4 tax opinion Holme Roberts & Owen LLP has assumed, and in rendering the HRO closing date tax opinion Holme Roberts & Owen LLP will assume:
- •
- that
any agreements Holme Roberts & Owen LLP has examined constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the parties thereto, enforceable against such parties in
accordance with their terms;
- •
- that
the merger agreement sets forth and the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part describes the complete agreement among Cimarex,
Magnum Hunter, and Merger Sub with respect to the merger;
- •
- that
the merger will be consummated in the manner described in the merger agreement and the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part;
- •
- that
the merger will be a valid merger under applicable state law;
- •
- the
accuracy and completeness of factual matters and descriptions contained in the documents that Holme Roberts & Owen LLP has examined and the accuracy and
completeness of representations, warranties and covenants made by Cimarex, Magnum Hunter, and Merger Sub in those documents as well as in representation letters delivered by Cimarex, Magnum Hunter,
and Merger Sub to Holme Roberts & Owen LLP; and
- •
- that the parties to the documents Holme Roberts & Owen LLP has reviewed and the representation letters that Holme Roberts & Owen LLP has received will act in accordance with, and will refrain from taking any action that is prohibited by, the terms and conditions thereof.
The HRO Form S-4 tax opinion does not constitute a representation as to any factual matters and the HRO closing date tax opinion will not constitute a representation as to any factual matters. The HRO Form S-4 tax opinion and the HRO closing date tax opinion will not bind the IRS or preclude it from challenging the conclusions set forth in those opinions, or preclude a court from adopting a contrary position. The HRO Form S-4 tax opinion is rendered as of April 25, 2005, and the HRO closing date tax opinion will be rendered as of the date thereof, and Holme Roberts & Owen LLP is under no obligation to supplement or revise its opinions after the date on which its opinions are rendered. Any change in the assumptions, conditions, qualifications, and limitations upon which the HRO Form S-4 tax opinion is based, or upon which the HRO closing date tax opinion will be based, could alter the conclusions reached in those opinions.
Potential Waiver of Closing Date Tax Opinions
Although the merger agreement allows Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, or both, to waive the condition that they receive their respective closing date tax opinion, neither Cimarex nor Magnum Hunter currently anticipates such a waiver. If either party waives the condition that they receive their respective closing date tax opinion, and if the tax consequences of the merger are materially different from those described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, we will recirculate a revised joint proxy statement/prospectus that summarizes the revised U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to be material to you and ask you to vote on the merger taking such waiver and such different tax consequences into consideration.
I-96
Neither Cimarex nor Magnum Hunter has obtained, or intends to obtain, a ruling from the IRS regarding the tax consequences of the merger.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders That Participate in the Merger
U.S. Holders That Hold Magnum Hunter Common Stock
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock will not recognize any gain or loss upon its exchange of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock for shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger.
If a U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock receives cash with respect to shares of Magnum Hunter common stock instead of a fractional share of Cimarex common stock, the U.S. holder will be required to recognize gain or loss, measured by the difference between the amount of cash received instead of that fractional share and the portion of the tax basis of that U.S. holder's shares of Magnum Hunter common stock allocable to that fractional share. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the share of Magnum Hunter common stock exchanged for that fractional share of Cimarex common stock was held for more than one year as of the effective time of the merger.
A U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock generally will have an aggregate tax basis in the Cimarex common stock received with respect to its shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger equal to (1) the aggregate tax basis of the Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered by that U.S. holder in the merger, less (2) any tax basis of the Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered that is allocable to any fractional share of Cimarex common stock for which cash is received.
A U.S. holder's holding period for shares of Cimarex common stock received in exchange for shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger generally will include the holding period for the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered by that U.S. holder in the merger.
If you are a U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock and you have differing bases or holding periods in your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to be exchanged in the merger, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor prior to the exchange with regard to identifying the bases or holding periods of the particular shares of Cimarex common stock that you will receive in the merger.
U.S. Holders That Hold Magnum Hunter Series A Preferred Stock
Each share of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock was originally entitled to a $7.50 cumulative dividend preference, payable only out of a portion of the net operating revenue from two identified properties of Magnum Hunter, and no additional dividends; a liquidation preference in an amount equal to any unpaid dividends at the time of the liquidation, payable only out of the liquidation proceeds from the two identified properties; and an additional liquidation preference in the amount of $0.001. Due in part to the fact that the dividend preference and associated liquidation preference were payable only out of the net operating revenues and liquidation proceeds, respectively, of specified properties of Magnum Hunter, the U.S. federal income tax characterization of the Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock as equity is not entirely free from doubt. However, other factors strongly support characterization of the Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock as equity, including the fact that shares of the Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock are perpetual and that the payment rights with respect to such shares are subordinate to the rights of Magnum Hunter's creditors. As a result, shares of the Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock should be characterized as equity of Magnum Hunter for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and thus, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. holder that exchanges Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger should be the same as those previously described with respect to a U.S. holder that holds
I-97
Magnum Hunter common stock (except that a U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock is not entitled to receive cash in lieu of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock).
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders That Participate in the Merger
General
As previously stated, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to stockholders that are subject to special rules such as: (1) a stockholder that is a non-U.S. holder and that holds its Magnum Hunter common stock in connection with a trade or business conducted in the United States or in connection with an office or fixed place of business located in the United States; (2) a stockholder that is a nonresident alien individual and that either is present in the United States in the taxable year or is subject to provisions of the Code applicable to expatriates; or (3) a stockholder that is affected by the provisions of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party.
If you are a non-U.S. holder and you may be subject to special tax rules because you conduct business in the United States, you have been present in the United States in the taxable year, you are an expatriate of the United States, or you are affected by the provisions of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party, you are urged to consult your own tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of the merger to you.
Non-U.S. Holders That Have Never Held More Than 5% of Magnum Hunter's Common Stock
Section 897 of the Code (enacted pursuant to United States tax legislation referred to as the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, or FIRPTA) generally subjects any gain or loss realized by a foreign person in connection with the sale or exchange of a "United States real property interest", or USRPI, to U.S. federal income tax as either ordinary income or capital gain that is effectively connected with the foreign person's conduct of a trade or business in the United States, referred to as the FIRPTA Tax.
For purposes of the FIRPTA Tax, stock held in a "United States real property holding corporation", or USRPHC, generally is classified as a USRPI. A corporation generally is classified as a USRPHC if the fair market value of its interests in United States real property equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests plus any other assets used or held for use in its trade or business. However, a foreign stockholder's interest in a USRPHC will not be treated as a USRPI if (1) the relevant class of stock of the USRPHC is "regularly traded on an established securities market" for purposes of Section 897(c)(3) of the Code and (2) that foreign stockholder has not held (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of such relevant class of stock of the USRPHC at any time during the shorter of (1) the five-year period ending on the date of the disposition of such interest or (2) the period during which such stockholder held such interest, the shorter of such periods referred to as the Testing Period.
For purposes of determining whether a foreign stockholder owns or has owned more than 5% of the relevant class of the outstanding shares of a USRPHC, the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code (as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) treat a foreign stockholder as owning shares that are (1) owned by (or that are subject to an option held by) certain family members, corporations, partnerships, estates or trusts or (2) subject to an option held by that foreign stockholder.
Magnum Hunter believes that it has continuously been a USRPHC during each of the last five years and that it will be a USRPHC as of the effective time of the merger. Magnum Hunter also expects that Magnum Hunter common stock will continue to be regularly traded on the NYSE at all
I-98
times leading up to and as of the effective time of the merger, such that Magnum Hunter common stock should be considered to be "regularly traded on an established securities market" for purposes of Section 897(c)(3) of the Code. If these expectations prove to be correct, the FIRPTA Tax will not apply to a non-U.S. holder that exchanges Magnum Hunter common stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger if that stockholder has not held (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's common stock at any time during the Testing Period. Assuming the FIRPTA Tax does not apply:
- •
- a
non-U.S. holder will not recognize any gain or loss upon its exchange of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock for shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger;
- •
- if
a non-U.S. holder receives cash instead of a fractional share of Cimarex common stock, any gain realized by that non-U.S. holder will not be
subject to U.S. federal income tax;
- •
- a
non-U.S. holder will have an aggregate tax basis in the Cimarex common stock received in the merger equal to (1) the aggregate tax basis of the Magnum
Hunter common stock surrendered by that non-U.S. holder in the merger, less (2) any tax basis of the Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered that is allocable to any fractional share
of Cimarex common stock for which cash is received; and
- •
- a non-U.S. holder's holding period for shares of Cimarex common stock received in exchange for shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger will include the holding period for the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered by that non-U.S. holder in the merger.
If you are a non-U.S. holder and you have differing bases or holding periods in your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to be exchanged in the merger, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor prior to the exchange with regard to identifying the bases or holding periods of the particular shares of Cimarex common stock that you will receive in the merger.
Non-U.S. Holders That Currently Hold or Have Held More Than 5% of Magnum Hunter's Common Stock
If a non-U.S. holder owns or has owned (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock at any time during the Testing Period, then the FIRPTA Tax will apply to that non-U.S. holder, referred to here as a Significant Non-U.S. Holder, unless the requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.897-6T are satisfied. If a non-U.S. holder has owned (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, but such ownership was not held at any time during the Testing Period, then that non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to the FIRPTA Tax.
In general, Treasury Regulation Section 1.897-6T enables a Significant Non-U.S. Holder to avoid the application of the FIRPTA Tax if: (1) that Significant Non-U.S. Holder exchanges its USRPI for another USRPI in connection with an exchange that is subject to the nonrecognition provisions of the Code (such as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code); (2) the USRPI received in the exchange would be subject to U.S. federal income tax if it was sold immediately after the exchange; and (3) that Significant Non-U.S. Holder complies with certain filing requirements (including the filing of a U.S. federal income tax return).
Cimarex expects that it will be a USRPHC both as of and immediately after the effective time of the merger. Cimarex also expects that Cimarex common stock will continue to be regularly traded on
I-99
the NYSE both as of and immediately after the effective time of the merger, such that Cimarex common stock should be considered to be "regularly traded on an established securities market" for purposes of Section 897(c)(3) of the Code. If these expectations prove to be correct, the requirements in clauses (1) and (2) of the preceding paragraph will not be satisfied unless a Significant Non-U.S. Holder owns (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock both as of and immediately after the effective time of the merger. As a result, unless a Significant Non-U.S. Holder owns more than 5% of Cimarex common stock both as of and immediately after the effective time of the merger, such Significant Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to the FIRPTA Tax.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a Significant Non-U.S. Holder that is not subject to the FIRPTA Tax should be the same as those previously described with respect to a non-U.S. holder that has never held more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock (except with respect to any cash received instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock, which will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the manner described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.897-6T(a)(8)).
If the FIRPTA Tax does apply:
- •
- a
Significant Non-U.S. Holder subject to such tax will recognize gain or loss measured by the difference between (1) the sum of the amount of any cash
received instead of a fractional share of Cimarex common stock and the fair market value of the Cimarex common stock received in the merger over (2) that Significant Non-U.S.
Holder's tax basis in its Magnum Hunter common stock surrendered in the merger;
- •
- that
gain or loss will be characterized as either ordinary or capital, depending on whether that Significant Non-U.S. Holder held its Magnum Hunter common stock
as a capital asset;
- •
- the
aggregate tax basis of the Cimarex common stock received in the merger will equal the fair market value of that Cimarex common stock as of the effective time of the
merger; and
- •
- the Significant Non-U.S. Holder's holding period for the Cimarex common stock received in the merger will begin the day after the effective time of the merger.
A Significant Non-U.S. Holder subject to the FIRPTA Tax also may be required to:
- •
- file a
U.S. federal income tax return reporting the gain subject to the FIRPTA Tax as income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the
United States and taxable as either ordinary income or capital gain; and
- •
- pay any FIRPTA Tax due upon the filing of the return or, depending upon the circumstances, earlier through estimated payments.
If you are a Significant Non-U.S. Holder and you have differing bases or holding periods in your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to be exchanged in the merger, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor prior to the exchange with regard to identifying the bases or holding periods of the particular shares of Cimarex common stock that you will receive in the merger.
Non-U.S. Holders That Hold Magnum Hunter Series A Preferred Stock
Because Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock is not regularly traded on an established securities market, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a non-U.S. holder that exchanges Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger should be the same as those previously described with respect to a Significant Non-U.S. Holder that is subject to the FIRPTA Tax.
I-100
If you are a non-U.S. holder, you are urged to consult your own tax advisor to determine the possible application of the FIRPTA Tax to you as a result of the exchange of Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders That Receive a Pre-Merger Distribution of TEL Offshore Trust Units
General
As previously described under "—The Merger—Distribution of TEL Offshore Trust Units" on page I-88, before the merger Magnum Hunter's board of directors intends to declare a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units, or possibly cash instead of such units, to each holder of Magnum Hunter common stock as of April 18, 2005. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of Magnum Hunter's distribution of the TEL Offshore Trust units, or possibly cash instead of such units, before the merger is not entirely free from doubt, and may be treated either as a pre-merger distribution that is separate from the merger or as consideration delivered in the merger. The 0.415 exchange ratio negotiated by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter reflects the fact that Cimarex did not wish to acquire the TEL Offshore Trust units in connection with the merger (see "—The Merger—Background of the Merger" on page I-45). In addition, the opinions of Magnum Hunter's financial advisors do not take the TEL Offshore Trust units into account for purposes of concluding that the 0.415 exchange ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to Magnum Hunter common stockholders (see "—The Merger—Opinions of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Deutsche Bank Securities Inc." on page I-66 and "—The Merger—Opinions of Magnum Hunter's Financial Advisors—Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated" on page I-78).
As a result, Magnum Hunter's distribution of the TEL Offshore Trust units, or possibly cash instead of such units, before the merger should be treated as a pre-merger distribution that is separate from the merger for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and Magnum Hunter will report the distribution in this manner. Assuming the distribution is treated as a pre-merger distribution that is separate from the merger, a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that are expected to be material to U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock that receive TEL Offshore Trust units or cash instead of such units is set forth below under "—Consequences to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders—Assuming TEL Distribution is Treated as a Pre-Merger Distribution Separate From the Merger."
Alternatively, assuming the IRS were to challenge the treatment of the distribution as a pre-merger distribution that is separate from the merger, and instead assert that the distribution should be treated as part of the merger consideration, and assuming such challenge was successful, the U.S. federal income tax consequences that are expected to be material to U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders of Magnum Hunter common stock that receive TEL Offshore Trust units or cash instead of such units are described below under "—Consequences to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders—Assuming TEL Distribution is Treated as Merger Consideration."
Assuming a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units is made by Magnum Hunter prior to the effective time of the merger, Magnum Hunter expects that each TEL Offshore Trust unit that is received by a U.S. holder or non-U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock will be treated as an ownership interest in a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partnership and its partners is complex and, among other potentially adverse tax consequences, a partner in a partnership is generally required to include its share of income attributable to the partnership in taxable income even if no distributions of cash or other property are actually made by the partnership during the taxable year.
If you are a U.S. holder or non-U.S. holder that may receive a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units prior to the effective time of the merger, you are urged to consult your own tax advisor to
I-101
determine the tax consequences associated with receiving, holding a continuing interest in, and ultimately selling or otherwise disposing of the TEL Offshore Trust units.
Consequences to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders—Assuming TEL Distribution is Treated as a Pre-Merger Distribution Separate From the Merger
U.S. Holders. Assuming the distribution is treated as a pre-merger distribution that is separate from the merger, a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units, or cash instead of such units, that is made to a U.S. holder and that is paid out of Magnum Hunter's current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, generally will constitute a dividend to the extent of the fair market value of such units, or cash instead of units, distributed to such U.S. holder. Magnum Hunter currently believes that it has sufficient earnings and profits such that the entire fair market value of all units, or cash instead of units, that may be distributed to holders of Magnum Hunter common stock before the merger will constitute a dividend.
In the case of a U.S. holder that is an individual, dividend income (provided certain holding period and other requirements are met) will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 15%. Dividends paid to a U.S. holder that is a corporation (provided certain holding period and other requirements are met) will generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided by Section 243(a)(1) of the Code. However, the benefit of the dividends received deduction may be reduced or eliminated by operation of the "extraordinary dividend" provisions of Section 1059 of the Code, which require a corporate U.S. holder, under certain circumstances, to reduce its adjusted tax basis in its shares of Magnum Hunter common stock by the amount excluded from income as a result of the dividends received deduction. The excess of any excluded amount over basis may be treated as gain.
Non-U.S. Holders. Assuming the distribution is treated as a pre-merger distribution that is separate from the merger, a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units, or cash instead of such units, that is made to a non-U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock and that is treated as a dividend (because it is paid out of Magnum Hunter's earnings and profits) generally will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30%. A reduced rate of withholding may apply under the terms of an applicable income tax treaty or if the dividend is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, provided that the requirements for securing such reduced rate of withholding are satisfied (which generally requires the provision of a properly completed IRS Form W-8ECI or Form W-8BEN to Magnum Hunter or its paying agent prior to the time any distribution is made). To the extent necessary, Magnum Hunter may monetize its investment in any TEL Offshore Trust units that would otherwise be distributed to a non-U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock and withhold a portion of the cash proceeds received in order to satisfy its withholding obligations for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Consequences to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders—Assuming TEL Distribution is Treated as Merger Consideration
U.S. Holders. Assuming the distribution is treated as merger consideration, a U.S. holder that receives TEL Offshore Trust units, or cash instead of such units, will generally be required to recognize gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but not loss. Any such gain recognized will equal the lesser of: (1) the sum of the fair market value of any units and any cash received (excluding cash instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock) and (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the fair market value of any units and any cash received (excluding cash instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock) and the fair market value of the Cimarex common stock received in the merger over (b) a U.S. holder's adjusted tax basis in the Magnum Hunter common stock exchanged by such holder in the merger. For this purpose, a Magnum Hunter common stockholder must calculate gain or loss separately for each identifiable block of Magnum Hunter common stock exchanged by the stockholder
I-102
in the merger. Any such gain generally will be capital gain, but such a determination depends in part on each U.S. holder's individual circumstances.
The aggregate tax basis of the shares of Cimarex common stock received by a U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger (before reduction for the basis held in any fractional share of Cimarex common stock for which cash is received) will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the U.S. holder's Magnum Hunter common stock, decreased by the sum of the fair market value of any units and any cash received (excluding cash received instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock) and increased by the amount of gain recognized by the U.S. holder in the merger (excluding any gain recognized as a result of cash received instead of a fractional share of Cimarex common stock).
The holding period of the shares of Cimarex common stock received by a U.S. holder of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger generally will include the holding period of the U.S. holder's Magnum Hunter common stock exchanged for Cimarex common stock.
If you are a U.S. holder and you have differing bases or holding periods in your shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to be exchanged in the merger, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor prior to the exchange with regard to identifying the bases or holding periods of the particular shares of Cimarex common stock that you will receive in the merger.
Non-U.S. Holders. Assuming the distribution is treated as merger consideration, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a non-U.S. holder that receives TEL Offshore Trust units, or cash instead of such units, generally will be the same as those previously described above under "—Non-U.S. Holders That Have Never Held More Than 5% of Magnum Hunter's Common Stock" or "—Non-U.S. Holders That Currently Hold or Have Held More Than 5% of Magnum Hunter's Common Stock," as appropriate, depending upon such non-U.S. holder's individual facts and circumstances. As a result, if a non-U.S. holder is a Significant Non-U.S. Holder, then such holder will generally be subject to the FIRPTA Tax with respect to the receipt of a pre-merger distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units or cash instead of such units.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
U.S. holders and non-U.S. holders that receive: (1) Cimarex common stock or cash instead of a fractional share of Cimarex common stock, or both, from the exchange agent in connection with the exchange of Magnum Hunter common stock or Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger or (2) a distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units, or cash instead of such units, may, in each case, be subject to backup withholding at applicable rates with respect to those payments, unless the U.S. holder or non-U.S. holder:
- •
- is
a corporation or other exempt recipient and, when required, establishes this exemption; or
- •
- provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that it is not currently subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be creditable against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder or non-U.S. holder if appropriate information is provided to the IRS. If, after the merger, a U.S. holder or non-U.S. holder does not provide the appropriate party with a correct taxpayer identification number or any other document or certification required by the IRS (including a Form W-9 in the case of a U.S. holder or Form W-8BEN or similar form in the case of a non-U.S. holder, or an acceptable substitute for these forms), those holders may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. The exchange agent or Magnum Hunter or Cimarex or other appropriate party will report the amount of
I-103
any reportable payments made to U.S. holders or non-U.S. holders (as well as any amounts withheld) to those holders and to the IRS.
Under Section 1445 of the Code, a person acquiring a USRPI from a foreign person generally is required to deduct and withhold a tax equal to 10% of the amount realized by that foreign person on the sale or exchange of that USRPI, referred to here as FIRPTA Withholding. However, Section 1445(b)(6) of the Code exempts from FIRPTA Withholding the sale or exchange of a share of stock that is treated as a USRPI if that share of stock is regularly traded on an established securities market.
Magnum Hunter expects that Magnum Hunter common stock will continue to be regularly traded on the New York Stock Exchange at all times leading up to and as of the effective time of the merger, such that Magnum Hunter common stock should be considered to be "regularly traded on an established securities market" for purposes of Section 1445(b)(6) of the Code. Assuming that this expectation proves to be correct, neither Cimarex nor the exchange agent will be required to deduct and withhold amounts on account of FIRPTA Withholding with respect to a non-U.S. holder's exchange of Magnum Hunter common stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger. However, Cimarex or its authorized agent generally will be required to deduct and withhold amounts on account of FIRPTA Withholding with respect to a non-U.S. holder that exchanges Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock for Cimarex common stock in the merger.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
Certain of Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's directors and executive officers have interests in the merger as individuals in addition to, and that may be different from, their interests as stockholders. The Cimarex and Magnum Hunter boards of directors were aware of these respective interests and considered them in their decision to approve the merger agreement.
In the merger agreement, Cimarex has agreed to cause one member of Magnum Hunter's board of directors to be elected to the board of directors of Cimarex following the merger. Cimarex will select the Magnum Hunter director before the effective time of the merger.
The merger will constitute a "change of control event" under the Cimarex incentive plan because of the number of shares of Cimarex common stock that will be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger. As a result, all participants in the plan, including executive officers and directors, would be entitled to acceleration of vesting of options and vesting and payment of restricted stock and restricted stock units and, in the case of directors, extension of the time to exercise options following termination of service as a director. Cimarex sought an agreement from all participants in the plan to waive acceleration of vesting and payment. As consideration for the waivers sought from its executive officers, Cimarex agreed to amend the unit and option agreements to provide that:
- (1)
- if
the restricted stock units are not redeemable when they vest, Cimarex will pay a participant holding a unit a cash bonus equal to the amount of Social Security taxes payable
grossed up for taxes payable on the bonus;
- (2)
- if
a participant holding a unit terminates employment on account of death or disability, vesting will be accelerated; and
- (3)
- if a participant holding an option terminates employment on account of death or disability, vesting will be accelerated.
I-104
In consideration for the waivers sought from all other employee participants, Cimarex agreed to amend the unit and option agreements as described in the preceding sentence and, in addition, agreed to grant, upon the closing of the merger, an additional grant of restricted stock or restricted stock units equal to 25% of the original grant, which will vest and become payable on the third anniversary of the closing of the merger. Cimarex has sought waivers from its directors of acceleration of vesting and payment of restricted stock (or in some cases deferred compensation units), but elected not to seek waivers of acceleration of vesting of options held by directors. The unexercisable options held by directors will fully vest by their terms on October 1, 2005, and only two directors (Messrs. Helmerich and Rooney) will receive an extension of the exercise period as a result of the change of control event. At April 15, 2005, each of the eight non-employee directors held unvested options representing 3,333 shares of common stock, which had a value, if exercised, of approximately $76,000, or an aggregate of 26,664 shares with a value, if exercised, of approximately $0.6 million.
Cimarex has obtained waivers from all of its current executive officers and directors. A former executive officer, Steven R. Shaw, declined to execute a waiver. Although no longer an executive officer, Mr. Shaw remains an employee of Cimarex. Upon the closing of the merger, Mr. Shaw's (i) unvested options representing 81,175 shares of common stock, which had a value, if exercised, at April 15, 2005, of $2.0 million, will vest; and (ii) 45,500 restricted stock units, which had a value at April 15, 2005 of $1.6 million, will vest and become payable.
With respect to the acceleration of vesting of options, holders who are not requested to or do not execute a waiver will have the right to exercise their options at and after closing until the option terminates in accordance with its terms. All restricted stock and restricted stock units held by those individuals will become payable at closing.
Cimarex is adopting the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, as of January 1, 2005. For those holders who do not execute waivers, related unearned compensation reflected in Cimarex's stockholders' equity would become fully amortized at closing. At December 31, 2004, total unearned compensation was approximately $10.1 million. For those holders who execute waivers, the waiver agreements will be accounted for as a modification of the original awards, and Cimarex will record additional deferred compensation equal to the difference between the fair value of the original award and the fair value of the modified award. The incremental deferred compensation will be amortized over the remaining term of the awards. Cash bonuses resulting from Social Security taxes payable when the awards vest will be accrued as of the end of each reporting period after the closing of the merger, using the related period-end stock price. The additional 25% grant of units will be recorded at fair market value on the date of grant, as unearned compensation to be amortized over the vesting period of the award.
Cimarex Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors
The merger will constitute a "change of control" under Cimarex's deferred compensation plan for directors because of the number of shares of Cimarex common stock that will be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger. As a result, the directors who are participating in the plan will be entitled to full vesting of their accounts and accelerated payment of their accounts if Cimarex amends the plan after a change of control. Each of the participating directors has waived the accelerated vesting and distribution.
Cimarex Supplemental Savings Plan
The merger will constitute a "change of control" under Cimarex's supplemental savings plan because of the number of shares of Cimarex common stock that will be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger. As a result, executive officers of Cimarex will be entitled to accelerated vesting and distribution of their account under the plan. Cimarex has sought the agreement of each of
I-105
the participants in the plan, including executive officers, to waive the accelerated vesting and distribution with respect to the merger. All of the executive officers except Paul Korus and Joseph R. Albi have waived accelerated vesting and distribution. As of April 15, 2005, Mr. Korus's account under the supplemental savings plan had a vested balance of $190,599 and no unvested balance, and Mr. Albi's account under the supplemental savings plan had a vested balance of $32,691 and no unvested balance.
Magnum Hunter Outside Director Policy Change of Control Provisions
The merger will constitute a "change of control" as defined in Magnum Hunter's outside director policy, and the removal of Magnum Hunter's directors as of the effective time of the merger will entitle the outside directors of Magnum Hunter to additional compensation as set forth in that policy. The outside directors of Magnum Hunter are Jerry Box, Gerald W. Bolfing, Donald A. Erickson, Matthew C. Lutz, Jody Powers, John H. Trescot, Jr., and F. Walker Tucie, Jr. At the effective time of the merger, each outside director will be entitled to receive additional compensation equal to two times the director's annual retainer, which will total (in the aggregate) $1,080,000. Under the merger agreement, if the payments made under the outside director policy or otherwise to an outside director who is an officer of Magnum Hunter are subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, the director will be entitled to an additional payment equal to the amount of the excise tax.
Magnum Hunter Employment Agreement Change in Control Provisions
The merger will constitute a "change in control" as defined in the employment agreements entered into among Magnum Hunter, Gruy Petroleum Management Co. and certain executives of Magnum Hunter. The executives covered by employment agreements are Richard R. Frazier, Gary C. Evans, R. Douglas Cronk, M. Bradley Davis, Dan Emmer, Charles R. Erwin, Frances P. Evans, Richard S. Farrell, Bill Irwin, Gregory L. Jessup, Morgan F. Johnston, David M. Keglovits, Earl Krieg, David S. Krueger, H. C. Lee, Donald H. Sabathier, and Howard M. Tate. After the effective time of the merger, these executives will have "good reason" to voluntarily terminate their employment in accordance with those agreements, which termination will entitle the executives to lump sum termination payments equal to their annual base salary, or a multiple of their annual base salary, for 2005, annualized bonus for 2004, and/or car allowance, as well as benefits continuation and other payments. The approximate amount of cash payments to be made to the executives upon termination of employment is $9,437,740. The value of benefits continuation for the executives will be approximately $193,150. In addition, under the employment agreements and the merger agreement, if payments made to an executive under the employment agreements or otherwise are subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, the executive will be entitled to an additional payment equal to the amount of the excise tax.
Magnum Hunter 2003 Bonus Deferral Plan
The merger will constitute a "change of control" as defined in Magnum Hunter's 2003 Bonus Deferral Plan. Under the plan, participants have elected to defer receipt of 18,816 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock. Such shares currently are held by Southwest Securities in the name of the Magnum Hunter 2003 Bonus Deferral Plan. As a result of the merger, all shares of common stock held on behalf of participants in the plan will become distributable in a single distribution as soon as practical after the effective time of the merger.
Acceleration and Assumption of Magnum Hunter Stock Options
In connection with the merger, options granted to executive officers of Magnum Hunter (whether vested or unvested) will be canceled in exchange for a cash payment. For a more complete description of the treatment of Magnum Hunter stock options in the merger, see "The Merger Agreement—Cancellation or Assumption of Stock Options."
I-106
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2005, the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to vested and unvested stock options held by Magnum Hunter's directors and executive officers and the estimated value of those stock options based on the closing price of Magnum Hunter of $16.11 per share on March 31, 2005:
| |
Number of Magnum Hunter Shares of Common Stock Underlying Unexercised Options at March 31, 2005(#) |
|
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Value of Unexercised Options at March 31, 2005($) |
|||||||||
| Name |
||||||||||
| Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
|||||||
| Gary C. Evans | 540,000 | 410,000 | $ | 4,292,550 | $ | 2,940,700 | ||||
| Richard R. Frazier | 358,000 | 166,000 | $ | 3,239,630 | $ | 1,271,180 | ||||
| Charles R. Erwin | 273,000 | 132,500 | $ | 2,519,895 | $ | 1,041,775 | ||||
| R. Douglas Cronk | 70,000 | 96,000 | $ | 541,925 | $ | 754,680 | ||||
| Morgan F. Johnston | 137,000 | 78,000 | $ | 1,275,918 | $ | 586,020 | ||||
| Gerald W. Bolfing | 38,100 | 14,500 | $ | 333,197 | $ | 109,635 | ||||
| Jerry Box | 38,100 | 14,500 | $ | 333,197 | $ | 109,635 | ||||
| Donald A. Erickson | — | 7,500 | $ | — | $ | 42,225 | ||||
| Matthew C. Lutz | 223,100 | 14,500 | $ | 1,845,109 | $ | 109,635 | ||||
| Jody Powers | — | 13,500 | $ | — | $ | 91,185 | ||||
| John H. Trescot, Jr. | 34,100 | 14,500 | $ | 288,797 | $ | 109,635 | ||||
On the date the merger agreement was executed, Gary C. Evans, Magnum Hunter's former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc. a related stockholder, entered into a voting agreement with Cimarex. As of March 31, 2005, these stockholders beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 3,943,794 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, which represented approximately 4.1% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock on that date. Under the voting agreement, these stockholders agreed, among other things, to vote all of their shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in favor of the merger agreement, against any action or agreement that he would reasonably expect to result in a material breach of any covenant, representation, warranty or other obligation of Magnum Hunter under the merger agreement and against any other takeover proposal. The voting agreement is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Indemnification of Magnum Hunter Directors and Officers
In the merger agreement, Cimarex agreed that all rights to indemnification by Magnum Hunter existing in favor of each person who is, was or becomes at any time before the effective time of the merger an "indemnified party" as defined below, as provided in Magnum Hunter's articles of incorporation or bylaws or under any other agreements in force on the date the merger agreement was signed, will remain in full force and effect for six years after the effective time of the merger. An indemnified party means an officer, director, employee, controlling stockholder or agent of Magnum Hunter or any subsidiary of Magnum Hunter or who acts as a fiduciary under any of Magnum Hunter's employee benefit plans.
For six years after the effective time of the merger, to the full extent permitted under applicable law, Cimarex will indemnify, defend and hold harmless each indemnified party against all losses, expenses, claims, damages, liabilities and amounts arising in whole or in part out of actions or omissions in their capacity as such occurring at or before the effective time of the merger. In addition, during such period of time Cimarex will reimburse each indemnified party for any legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the indemnified party in connection with investigating or defending
I-107
any such losses, expenses, claims, damages, liabilities and amounts as such expenses are incurred. Cimarex will not be liable for any settlement of any pending or threatened action effected without its advance written consent, which may not be unreasonably withheld.
Cimarex will cause the surviving corporation to maintain Magnum Hunter's officers' and directors' liability insurance policies, in effect on the date of the merger agreement, for a period of not less than six years after the effective time of the merger, but only to the extent related to actions or omissions before the effective time of the merger; provided, that:
- •
- Cimarex
may substitute policies of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms no less advantageous to those former directors or officers;
- •
- the
substitution will not result in gaps or lapses of coverage with respect to matters occurring before the effective time of the merger; and
- •
- Cimarex will not be required to expend more than an amount per year equal to 200% of current annual premiums paid by Magnum Hunter for its insurance, referred to as the maximum amount.
If the amount of the annual premiums necessary to maintain or procure insurance coverage exceeds the maximum amount, Cimarex and the surviving corporation will procure and maintain for the six-year period as much comparable coverage as possible for the maximum amount. These obligations are binding upon any successor to Cimarex.
I-108
OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
AND FIVE PERCENT STOCKHOLDERS
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Cimarex is entitled to designate one member of Magnum Hunter's board of directors to serve as a member of the Cimarex board of directors. Cimarex has agreed to cause this director to be appointed to Cimarex's board at or promptly after the effective time of the merger, to serve until the earlier of his resignation or removal or until his successor is duly elected and qualified in accordance with the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Cimarex. Cimarex will designate the Magnum Hunter director and assign the director to a class of Cimarex directors before the closing of the merger.
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2005, regarding the share ownership of Magnum Hunter by:
- •
- each
person known to Magnum Hunter to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock;
- •
- each
director of Magnum Hunter;
- •
- Magnum
Hunter's chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of Magnum Hunter; and
- •
- all directors and executive officers of Magnum Hunter, as a group.
None of the directors or executive officers named below, as of March 31, 2005, owned any shares of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock or its 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock. The business address of each officer and director listed below is: c/o Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., 600 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039.
| |
Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name |
Number of Shares |
Percent of Class (l) |
||||
| Directors and Executive Officers | ||||||
| Gary C. Evans | 3,943,794 | (a) | 4.1 | % | ||
| Richard R. Frazier | 539,454 | (b) | * | |||
| Charles R. Erwin | 348,336 | (c) | * | |||
| R. Douglas Cronk | 102,432 | (d) | * | |||
| Morgan F. Johnston | 165,134 | (e) | * | |||
| Gerald W. Bolfing | 439,856 | (f) | * | |||
| Donald A. Erickson | 37,000 | * | ||||
| Matthew C. Lutz | 288,821 | (g) | * | |||
| Jody Powers | 11,710 | * | ||||
| John H. Trescot, Jr. | 137,759 | (h) | * | |||
| F. Walker Tucei, Jr. | 2,000 | * | ||||
| Jerry Box | 64,200 | (i) | * | |||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons) | 6,080,496 | 6.3 | % | |||
I-109
| |
Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name |
Number of Shares |
Percent of Class (m) |
||||
| Beneficial owners of 5% or more (excluding persons named above) | ||||||
| Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
5,434,000 | (j) | 5.7 | % | ||
| Barclays Global Investors 45 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 |
5,374,858 | (l) | 5.6 | % | ||
- *
- Less
than one percent.
- (a)
- Includes
540,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options. Also includes 36,185 equivalent shares held by the trustee for the benefit
of employee participants in the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Participants in this plan instruct the trustee as to how the participants' equivalent shares should
be voted. Also includes 17,024 shares held in the name of Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc., a corporation whose sole stockholder is Mr. Evans' wife. Mr. Evans disclaims any
ownership in such securities other than those in which he has an economic interest.
- (b)
- Includes
358,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options. Also includes 29,217 equivalent shares held by the trustee for the benefit
of employee participants in the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Participants in this plan instruct the trustee as to how the participants' equivalent
shares should be voted.
- (c)
- Includes
273,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options. Also includes 25,336 equivalent shares held by the trustee for the benefit
of employee participants in the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Participants in this plan instruct the trustee as to how the participants' equivalent
shares should be voted.
- (d)
- Includes
70,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options. Also includes 29,072 equivalent shares held by the trustee for the benefit
of employee participants in the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Participants in this plan instruct the trustee as to how the participants' equivalent
shares should be voted.
- (e)
- Includes
137,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options. Also includes 23,654 equivalent shares held by the trustee for the benefit
of employee participants in the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Participants in this plan instruct the trustee as to how the participants' equivalent
shares should be voted.
- (f)
- Includes
38,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options.
- (g)
- Includes
223,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options.
- (h)
- Includes 34,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options.
I-110
- (i)
- Includes
38,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of certain currently exercisable options.
- (j)
- Based
on Schedule 13G filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. on February 9, 2005.
- (k)
- Based
on Schedule 13G filed by Barclays Global Investors on February 14, 2005.
- (l)
- Percentage is calculated on the number of shares outstanding plus those deemed outstanding under Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act.
See "Chapter II—The Cimarex Annual Meeting Proposals—Election of Directors" beginning on page II-1 for biographical information about Cimarex's directors, director nominees and executive officers, along with information about executive compensation and beneficial ownership of Cimarex common stock.
I-111
The following is a summary of the material terms of the merger agreement. This summary does not purport to describe all the terms of the merger agreement and is qualified by reference to the complete text of the merger agreement, as amended, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated herein by reference. All stockholders of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter are urged to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety.
Under the merger agreement, Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex, will merge with and into Magnum Hunter, with Magnum Hunter continuing as the surviving corporation. As a result of the merger, Magnum Hunter will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex.
In the merger, holders of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will receive 0.415 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. This ratio is referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the exchange ratio. In the merger agreement, this ratio is called the conversion number. The exchange ratio will not be adjusted in the case of changes in the outstanding shares of Cimarex between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger. Magnum Hunter common stockholders will receive cash for any fractional shares which they would otherwise receive in the merger.
In the merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 20 shares of Cimarex common stock. Based upon the 80,000 shares of Series A preferred stock currently outstanding, holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock would receive 0.00025 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Series A preferred stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. This ratio will not be adjusted in the case of changes in the outstanding shares of Cimarex between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger. Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stockholders will receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock to the extent necessary. However, Cimarex may offer Series A preferred stockholders the opportunity either to purchase an additional fraction of a share or to aggregate its fractional share with those of other Series A preferred stockholders to be sold. Cimarex may not force Series A preferred stockholders to receive cash in respect of their fractional shares.
Conversion of 1996 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
There are currently 1,000,000 issued shares of 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock, all of which are held by a wholly owned subsidiary of Magnum Hunter. Under the merger agreement, Magnum Hunter is required to cause its subsidiary to convert, before the effective time of the merger, all of the shares of Magnum Hunter 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock into shares of Magnum Hunter common stock under the terms set forth in the certificate of designations for that stock. Magnum Hunter expects to issue 1,904,762 shares of its common stock upon conversion of the preferred shares. These shares of common stock then will be converted into 790,476 shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger in accordance with the exchange ratio.
The merger will become effective when we file the articles of merger or other appropriate documents with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. However, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter may agree to a later time for consummation of the merger and specify that time in the articles of
I-112
merger. We will file the articles of merger as soon as practicable after the satisfaction or, where permissible, waiver of the closing conditions in the merger agreement, which are described below. We currently believe we can complete the merger during the second quarter of 2005.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
Conditions to Each Party's Obligation
Each party's obligation to effect the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of various conditions which include, in addition to other customary closing conditions, the following:
- •
- the
merger agreement has been approved by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter entitled to vote at the Magnum
Hunter special meeting;
- •
- the
issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger has been approved by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting;
- •
- the
waiting period applicable to the merger under the HSR Act has expired or been terminated and all governmental approvals have been obtained, except where the failure to
obtain any such approvals (other than those from the SEC or with respect to the HSR Act) would not be reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the combined company or to materially
adversely affect the completion of the merger;
- •
- the
registration statement on Form S-4 of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part has been declared effective by the SEC under the
Securities Act, and no stop orders suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement have been issued by the SEC and no proceedings for that purpose have been initiated or threatened by the
SEC;
- •
- no
temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction or other order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the
completion of the merger is in effect;
- •
- the
shares of Cimarex common stock issuable to the Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger and upon exercise of the Magnum Hunter options assumed by Cimarex in the merger
have been approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance;
- •
- the
representations and warranties of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, set forth in the merger agreement are true and correct as of the date of the merger agreement
and as of the closing date, with the same effect as if made at and as of that time (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of that date), except where the failure
of those representations and warranties to be so true and correct (without giving effect to any threshold or any limitation as to "materially" or "material adverse effect," or words of similar import,
or any knowledge qualifier) does not have, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, as applicable, or its
ability to complete the merger;
- •
- Cimarex
and Magnum Hunter, respectively, have performed in all material respects all obligations required to be performed by each of them, respectively, under the merger
agreement on or before the closing date of the merger agreement; and
- •
- No material adverse effect has occurred between the date of the merger agreement and the closing date with respect to Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, respectively.
I-113
Additional Conditions to Cimarex's and Merger Sub's Obligation
Cimarex's and Merger Sub's obligation to effect the merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:
- •
- Cimarex
has received from Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, counsel to Cimarex, on the date on which the registration statement relating to the issuance of the shares of
Cimarex common stock in the merger is declared effective by the SEC and on the closing date of the merger, an opinion, dated as of that date and stating, among other things, that the merger will
qualify for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
- •
- the
merger and the merger agreement have not caused any rights under Magnum Hunter's stockholder rights plan to become exercisable or to be distributed; and
- •
- Magnum Hunter has obtained all consents and approvals, other than governmental approvals, required in connection with the execution and delivery of the merger agreement and completion of the merger, except for consents that would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Magnum Hunter or the merger.
Additional Conditions to Magnum Hunter's Obligation
Magnum Hunter's obligation to effect the merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:
- •
- Magnum
Hunter has received from Thompson & Knight L.L.P., counsel to Magnum Hunter, on the date on which the registration statement relating to the issuance of the
shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger is declared effective by the SEC and on the closing date of the merger, an opinion, dated as of that date and stating, among other things, that the merger
will qualify for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
- •
- the
merger and the merger agreement have not caused any rights under Cimarex's stockholder rights plan to become exercisable or to be distributed;
- •
- Cimarex
has delivered to its transfer agent instructions authorizing the issuance of Cimarex common stock to Magnum Hunter stockholders upon surrender of certificates
representing shares of Magnum Hunter common stock; and
- •
- Cimarex has obtained all consents and approvals, other than governmental approvals, required in connection with the execution and delivery of the merger agreement and completion of the merger, except for consents that would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Cimarex or the merger.
Additional Information on Conditions
Material Adverse Effect. The merger agreement provides that a material adverse effect, as it relates to Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, means an event or inaccuracy that would reasonably be expected to:
- •
- have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, capitalization, results of operations or business of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, as applicable, and their respective wholly owned subsidiaries taken as a whole, or the aggregate value of their assets and liabilities, except for events affecting the energy industry or capital markets generally or effects resulting from the announcement of the merger;
I-114
- •
- impair
materially the ability of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, as applicable, and their respective wholly owned subsidiaries taken as a whole, to own, hold, develop and operate
their assets;
- •
- impair
materially the ability of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, as applicable, to complete the merger or perform any of its obligations under the merger agreement; or
- •
- impair materially Cimarex's ability to vote, receive dividends, or otherwise exercise ownership rights with respect to the stock of the surviving corporation and, indirectly, control over the assets of the surviving corporation.
No Assurance. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter cannot assure you that all of the conditions to the merger will be satisfied or, where permitted, waived by the party permitted to do so. Further, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter cannot at this point determine whether either of them would resolicit proxies if they decided and were permitted to waive any of the conditions listed above. This decision would depend upon the facts and circumstances leading to each of Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's decision to complete the merger and whether each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, as applicable, believes there has been a material change in the terms of the merger and its effect on their respective stockholders. In making each of their determinations, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, would consider, among other factors, the reasons for the waiver, the effect of the waiver on the terms of the merger, whether the requirement being waived was necessary in order to make the deal fair to their respective stockholders from a financial point of view, the availability of alternative transactions and the prospects of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, as applicable, as an independent entity. In the event of a waiver of a condition to the merger, if either Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, as applicable, determines that the waiver of that condition would materially change the terms of the merger, including the expected qualification of the merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, it will resolicit proxies.
No Solicitation of Takeover Proposals
The merger agreement provides that, from the date of the merger agreement until the effective time of the merger or, if earlier, the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, Magnum Hunter will not, nor will it permit any of its subsidiaries to, nor will it authorize or permit any officer, director or employee of Magnum Hunter or any of Magnum Hunter's subsidiaries to, nor will it authorize any investment banker, attorney or other advisor or representative of Magnum Hunter or any of Magnum Hunter's subsidiaries to:
- (i)
- solicit,
initiate, or knowingly encourage the submission of, any takeover proposal (as defined below);
- (ii)
- approve
or recommend any takeover proposal, enter into any agreement, agreement-in-principle or letter of intent with respect to or accept any
takeover proposal (or resolve to or publicly propose to do any of the foregoing); or
- (iii)
- participate or engage in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect to, or knowingly take any action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any takeover proposal.
Permitted Actions by Magnum Hunter
Notwithstanding Magnum Hunter's obligations described above,
- (x)
- if (under circumstances in which Magnum Hunter has complied with all of its obligations under this no solicitation limitation), before the merger agreement is approved by the Magnum Hunter stockholders, Magnum Hunter receives an unsolicited written takeover
I-115
- (A)
- the
third party enters into a confidentiality agreement in customary form that is no less favorable to Magnum Hunter than the confidentiality agreement entered into between Cimarex
and Magnum Hunter, and
- (B)
- the
board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines in its good faith judgment, after receiving the advice of outside legal counsel, that it is required to do so in order to comply
with its fiduciary duties under applicable law; and
- (y)
- at
any time before the merger agreement is approved by the Magnum Hunter stockholders, and subject to Magnum Hunter's compliance with its obligations under the no
solicitation limitations described above, Magnum Hunter's board of directors may
- (A)
- withdraw
(or amend or modify in a manner adverse to Cimarex or Merger Sub), or publicly propose to withdraw (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to Cimarex or Merger Sub), the
recommendation or declaration of advisability by Magnum Hunter's board of directors of the merger agreement, the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and recommend, or
publicly propose to recommend any takeover proposal,
- (B)
- recommend,
adopt or approve any takeover proposal, or publicly propose to do so, or
- (C)
- to the extent permitted by the provisions of the merger agreement setting forth Magnum Hunter's rights and obligations in the event it determines to accept a superior proposal and terminate the merger agreement, allow Magnum Hunter to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a superior proposal,
proposal from a third party that the board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines in good faith (after consulting with its financial advisors) is, or is reasonably likely to result in, a superior proposal, Magnum Hunter and its representatives may conduct such additional discussions and provide such information as the board of directors of Magnum Hunter will determine, but only if, before providing such information or conducting such additional discussions,
- (1)
- the
board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines in good faith, after consulting with its financial advisors and providing Cimarex with three business days to propose an alternative
transaction as defined below, that the takeover proposal is a superior proposal and
- (2)
- the
board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines in its good faith judgment, after receiving the advice of outside legal counsel, that it is required to do so in order to comply
with its fiduciary duties under applicable law; and
- (z)
- nothing contained in the no solicitation provisions addressed above or in the provisions regarding approval, recommendation or entrance into another takeover proposal will prohibit Magnum Hunter or its board of directors from disclosing to Magnum Hunter's stockholders a position with respect to a tender or exchange offer by a third party under Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2 under the Exchange Act, to the extent required by applicable law, provided that the board of directors of Magnum Hunter will not recommend that the stockholders of Magnum Hunter tender their Magnum Hunter common stock in connection with any tender or exchange offer unless the board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines in good faith, after receiving the advice of its financial advisors and providing Cimarex with three business days to propose an alternative transaction as defined below, that the takeover proposal is a superior proposal as defined below.
in the case of either sub-clauses (A), (B) or (C) of this clause (y) only after
I-116
Terms Used in No Solicitation Provisions
Takeover Proposal. For purposes of the merger agreement, a takeover proposal refers to any inquiry, proposal or offer from any person (other than Cimarex, Merger Sub or any of their affiliates) relating to any acquisition, merger, consolidation, reorganization, share exchange, recapitalization, liquidation, direct or indirect business combination, asset acquisition or other similar transaction involving Magnum Hunter or any of its subsidiaries of:
- (A)
- assets
or businesses that constitute or represent 10% or more of the total revenue, operating income, EBITDA or assets of Magnum Hunter and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or
- (B)
- 10% or more of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock or any other Magnum Hunter capital stock or capital stock of, or other equity or voting interests in, any of Magnum Hunter's subsidiaries directly or indirectly holding, individually or taken together, the assets or business referred to in clause (A) above,
in each case other than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Superior Proposal. The term superior proposal refers to any bona fide written takeover proposal to effect a merger, consolidation, reorganization, share exchange, recapitalization, liquidation, direct or indirect business combination, or other similar transaction made by a third party to acquire, directly or indirectly:
- (A)
- 50%
or more of the assets of Magnum Hunter and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or
- (B)
- 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of Magnum Hunter,
in any such case on terms that the board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines in its good faith judgment (after consulting with its financial advisors and outside counsel), taking into account all relevant factors, including any conditions to the takeover proposal, the timing of the closing thereof, the risk of nonconsummation, the ability of the person making the takeover proposal to finance the transaction contemplated thereby, any required governmental or other consents, filings and approvals and any alternative transaction proposed by Cimarex,
- (x)
- would,
if consummated, result in a transaction that is more favorable to Magnum Hunter's stockholders from a financial point of view than the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the terms of any alternative transaction as defined below; and
- (y)
- is reasonably likely to be financed and otherwise completed without undue delay.
Alternative Transaction. The term alternative transaction refers to any proposal by Cimarex to modify the terms of the merger agreement or the merger in response to a takeover proposal received by Magnum Hunter.
Reasons for Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time before the effective time of the merger, whether before or after the merger agreement has been adopted by the Cimarex common stockholders or the Magnum Hunter common stockholders:
- (1)
- by
mutual written consent of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- (2)
- by
either Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, if:
- •
- the merger has not been consummated by July 25, 2005 (or October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part effective by June 1, 2005), except that the right to terminate under this paragraph will
I-117
- •
- any
order, decree, ruling or other action permanently restraining, enjoining or prohibiting the merger is in effect and has become final and nonappealable, except that the
right to terminate under this paragraph will not be available to any party until that party has used all reasonable efforts to remove the injunction, order or decree; or
- •
- the
required vote of the Magnum Hunter stockholders is not obtained at the Magnum Hunter special meeting or the required vote of the Cimarex stockholders is not obtained at
the Cimarex annual meeting;
- (3)
- by
Cimarex, if
- •
- the
board of directors of Magnum Hunter has withdrawn or modified or amended in any respect adverse to Cimarex its adoption of or recommendation in favor of the merger
agreement or has failed to make a favorable recommendation;
- •
- the
board of directors of Magnum Hunter or any board committee has recommended to the stockholders of Magnum Hunter any takeover proposal or will have resolved to, or
publicly announced an intention to, do so;
- •
- Magnum
Hunter has committed a willful, material breach of the no solicitation limitations; or
- •
- Magnum
Hunter has breached or failed to perform in any material respect any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the merger
agreement, which breach or failure to perform:
- —
- would
give rise to the failure of the conditions to Cimarex's obligation to consummate the merger relating to Magnum Hunter's representations and warranties and performance
of its obligations, and
- —
- has
not been cured by Magnum Hunter within 10 days after written notice has been given by Cimarex to Magnum Hunter of its breach or failure to perform, but no later
than July 25, 2005 (or October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part effective by June 1, 2005);
or
- (4)
- by
Magnum Hunter, if
- •
- before
the Magnum Hunter special meeting,
- —
- Magnum
Hunter has not breached the no solicitation limitations in any material respect,
- —
- the
board of directors of Magnum Hunter authorizes Magnum Hunter, subject to complying with the provisions outlined under "—No Solicitation of Takeover
Proposals" above and this paragraph (4), to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a superior proposal and Magnum Hunter notifies Cimarex in writing
that it intends to enter into such an agreement,
- —
- Cimarex does not make, within three business days of receipt of Magnum Hunter's written notification of its intention to enter into the agreement, an offer that the board of directors of Magnum Hunter determines, in its good faith judgment (after consulting with its financial advisors) is at least as favorable to Magnum Hunter's stockholders from a financial point of view as the superior proposal, and
not be available to any party whose breach of any representation or failure to fulfill any obligation under the merger agreement has been the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the merger to occur on or before that date;
I-118
- —
- Magnum
Hunter before the termination pays to Cimarex in immediately available funds any fees required to be paid following termination of the merger agreement described
under "—Termination Fee" below; or
- •
- Cimarex
has breached or failed to perform in any material respect any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the merger agreement,
which breach or failure to perform:
- —
- would
give rise to the failure of the conditions to Magnum Hunter's obligation to consummate the merger relating to Cimarex's representations and warranties and performance
of its obligations, and
- —
- has not been cured by Cimarex within 10 days after written notice has been given by Magnum Hunter to Cimarex of its breach or failure to perform, but no later than July 25, 2005 (or October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part effective by June 1, 2005).
Effect of Termination
If it is terminated, the merger agreement will become void and of no further force and effect, except with respect to certain designated sections of the merger agreement, and there will be no liability on behalf of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter, except for liabilities arising from a willful breach of the merger agreement.
Under the merger agreement, if:
- •
- the merger agreement is terminated for any of the reasons described in the first three bullet points of paragraph (3) or the first bullet point of paragraph (4) under "—Termination" above; or
| • | (A) | a takeover proposal in respect of Magnum Hunter is publicly announced or is proposed or offered or made to Magnum Hunter or Magnum Hunter's stockholders before the merger agreement is approved by Magnum Hunter's stockholders, |
- (B)
- the
merger agreement is terminated by either party for failure to obtain the required Magnum Hunter stockholder vote without any breach by Magnum Hunter
of its no solicitation obligations, and
- (C)
- within 12 months following the termination Magnum Hunter enters into, directly or indirectly, an agreement with the proponent of the takeover proposal or an affiliate of the proponent,
Magnum Hunter must pay Cimarex a termination fee in immediately available funds of $45,000,000 no later than one business day following termination of the merger agreement or, in the case of termination in connection with a takeover proposal, on the date of consummation of or entry into the agreement for that transaction. For purposes of this paragraph, the references in the definition of takeover proposal to 10% will be changed to 50%.
In the merger agreement, the parties agreed that all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby will be paid by the party incurring those expenses, whether or not the merger is consummated. Cimarex has agreed to pay the
I-119
fee for filing the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part with the SEC, along with the expenses of printing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and complying with any other applicable securities laws in connection with the registration statement and this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter will pay all expenses of mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to and soliciting proxies from its respective stockholders.
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
Conduct of Business by Magnum Hunter
In the merger agreement, Magnum Hunter has agreed that, before the effective time of the merger, unless Cimarex otherwise consents or except as expressly permitted or required under the merger agreement:
- •
- each
of Magnum Hunter and its subsidiaries will conduct its business only in the ordinary and usual course of business and consistent with past practices, and will:
- —
- operate,
maintain and otherwise deal with Magnum Hunter's oil and gas interests in accordance with good and prudent oil and gas field practices and in accordance with all
applicable oil and gas leases and other contracts and agreements and all applicable laws, rules and regulations;
- —
- keep
and maintain accurate books, records and accounts;
- —
- maintain
its insurance policies in full force and effect;
- —
- pay
all taxes, assessments and other governmental charges imposed upon any of their assets or with respect to their franchises, business, income or assets before any penalty
or interest accrues;
- —
- pay
all material claims that have become due and payable and which by law have or may become a lien upon any of their assets before the time when any penalty or fine is
incurred or any lien is imposed;
- —
- comply
in all material respects with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders of any governmental authority, obtain or take all governmental
actions necessary in the operation of their businesses, and comply with and enforce the provisions of all material agreements, including paying when due all rentals, royalties, expenses and other
liabilities relating to their businesses or assets; and
- —
- at
all times preserve and keep in full force and effect their corporate existence and rights and franchises material to their performance under the merger agreement; and
- •
- Magnum
Hunter will not directly or indirectly, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, do any of the following:
- —
- amend
or propose to amend its articles of incorporation or bylaws or, in the case of its subsidiaries, their respective constituent documents;
- —
- split,
combine or reclassify any outstanding shares of its capital stock;
- —
- declare,
set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution payable in cash, capital stock, property or otherwise with respect to any shares of its capital stock, other
than the distribution of TEL Offshore Trust interests described under "The Merger—Distribution of TEL Offshore Trust Units";
- —
- issue, sell or agree to issue or sell or amend any shares of, or any options, warrants or rights of any kind to acquire any shares of, or any securities convertible into or
I-120
- (A)
- exercise
of warrants outstanding on the date of the merger agreement,
- (B)
- exercise
of options outstanding on the date of the merger agreement, or granted as permitted by the merger agreement, and
- (C)
- conversion
of Magnum Hunter's 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock as described under "—Conversion of 1996 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock" above;
- —
- reduce
the exercise or conversion price or extend the time for exercise or conversion of any rights, options or warrants to acquire its securities, except as contractually
required;
- —
- purchase,
cancel, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock, other securities or other equity interests, except as permitted by the terms of Magnum
Hunter's employee benefit plans or in connection with the cancellation of Magnum Hunter stock options in the merger;
- —
- merge
or consolidate with or transfer substantially all its assets to, any person except as contemplated by the merger agreement;
- —
- liquidate,
wind up or dissolve;
- —
- acquire
any interest in a business entity for a purchase price of $2,000,000 or more, other than interests in joint ventures, joint operation or ownership arrangements or
tax partnerships acquired in the ordinary course of business;
- —
- sell,
lease or sublease, transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any oil and gas interests or other assets of Magnum Hunter that have a
value of $1,000,000 or more individually, except for the sale of hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business or encumbrances under Magnum Hunter's credit facility;
- —
- farm-out
any oil and gas interest of Magnum Hunter having a value of $2,000,000 or more;
- —
- sell,
transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any securities of any other person, including any capital stock or other securities or
equity interest in any of Magnum Hunter's subsidiaries;
- —
- make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any person in an aggregate amount of $500,000 or more, other than in the ordinary course of
business;
- —
- enter
into any material agreement or any other agreement not terminable upon notice of 30 days or less and without penalty or other obligation;
- —
- permit
the outstanding indebtedness under Magnum Hunter's credit facility to exceed $400,000,000, not counting any indebtedness incurred to fund costs relating to the merger
agreement;
- —
- incur
any indebtedness for borrowed money, other than under trade credit vendor lines not exceeding $1,000,000 in the aggregate, under Magnum Hunter's credit facility or
related to cash payments for cancellation of Magnum Hunter stock options in the merger;
- —
- incur
any other obligation or liability, other than in the ordinary course of business;
- —
- assume, endorse (other than endorsements of negotiable instruments in the ordinary course of business), guarantee or otherwise become liable or responsible for the liabilities or obligations of any other person in an amount of $500,000 or more, whether directly, contingently or otherwise;
exchangeable for any shares of, its capital stock or other securities, except for shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issuable upon:
I-121
- —
- enter
into, amend or modify any derivative transactions;
- —
- incur
any obligation or liability that exceeds $500,000 under the guaranty by Magnum Hunter to Compass Bank, dated December 20, 2004, with respect to indebtedness of
Metrix Networks, Inc.;
- —
- voluntarily
resign, transfer or otherwise relinquish any right as operator of any oil and gas interest of Magnum Hunter, except as required by law, regulation or contract or
to the extent the action would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Magnum Hunter;
- —
- voluntarily
resign, transfer or otherwise relinquish any right with respect to any standstill agreement;
- —
- enter
into, or otherwise become liable or obligated under, or amend or extend:
- (A)
- any
employee benefit, pension or other plan, whether or not subject to ERISA,
- (B)
- any
other stock option, stock purchase, incentive or deferred compensation plan or arrangement or other fringe benefit plan, or
- (C)
- any
consulting, employment, severance, retention, termination or similar agreement with any person;
- —
- except
for payments made under any Magnum Hunter employee benefit plan or any other plan, agreement or arrangement described in Magnum Hunter's disclosure schedule, grant,
or otherwise become liable for or obligated to pay, any severance, retention or termination payment, bonus or increase in compensation or benefits (other than payments, bonuses or increases that are
mandated by the terms of agreements existing as of the date of the merger agreement or that are paid in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, and not individually or in the
aggregate material in amount) to, or forgive any indebtedness of, any employee or consultant of any of Magnum Hunter or its subsidiaries;
- —
- enter
into any contract or commitment to do any of the things listed above;
- —
- create,
incur, assume or permit to exist any lien on any of its assets, except as permitted by the merger agreement;
- —
- take
any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the breach of any of Magnum Hunter's representations and warranties, except as specifically permitted by the
merger agreement;
- —
- approve
or implement budgets for general and administrative expenses (including salary, bonuses, general operating and overhead expenses) or budgets for capital
expenditures, or incur expenses or disburse funds for any of those purposes except under the budgets which have been approved by Cimarex or revisions to the budgets which are approved by Cimarex, such
approval not to be unreasonably withheld;
- —
- except
to the extent already included in a budget approved by Cimarex, enter into any agreements or other arrangements with respect to, or make any payments, incur any
expenses or disburse any funds for:
- (A)
- any capital project, the completion or full capitalization of which can reasonably be expected to require Magnum Hunter to expend, in the aggregate, $2,000,000 or more for an onshore project or $1,000,000 or more for an offshore project, or
I-122
- (B)
- any
capital project for the exploration of oil and gas interests with undeveloped reserves (including the acquisition of leasehold interests and seismic data, the drilling of wells
and all related costs and expenses) which can reasonably be expected to require Magnum Hunter to expend, in the aggregate, $2,000,000 or more for an onshore project or $1,000,000 or more for an
offshore project;
- —
- make
any capital expenditure or general and administrative expense payment which, for any project, exceeds by more than 10 percent the amount set forth in the
appropriate line item for that expenditure in a budget approved by Cimarex; or
- —
- knowingly take, or agree to commit to take, any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the failure of a condition to Cimarex's and Merger Sub's obligation to complete the merger, or that would materially impair or delay the ability of Magnum Hunter, Cimarex, Merger Sub or the holders of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to complete the merger.
Conduct of Business by Cimarex
In the merger agreement, Cimarex has agreed that, before the effective time of the merger, unless Magnum Hunter otherwise consents or except as expressly permitted or required under the merger agreement:
- •
- each
of Cimarex and its subsidiaries will conduct its business only in the ordinary and usual course of business and consistent with past practices, and will:
- —
- operate,
maintain and otherwise deal with Cimarex's oil and gas interests in accordance with good and prudent oil and gas field practices and in accordance with all
applicable oil and gas leases and other contracts and agreements and all applicable laws, rules and regulations;
- —
- keep
and maintain accurate books, records and accounts;
- —
- maintain
its insurance policies in full force and effect;
- —
- pay
all taxes, assessments and other governmental charges imposed upon any of their assets or with respect to their franchises, business, income or assets before any penalty
or interest accrues;
- —
- pay
all material claims that have become due and payable and which by law have or may become a lien upon any of their assets before the time when any penalty or fine is
incurred or any lien is imposed;
- —
- comply
in all material respects with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders of any governmental authority, obtain or take all governmental
actions necessary in the operation of their businesses, and comply with and enforce the provisions of all material agreements, including paying when due all rentals, royalties, expenses and other
liabilities relating to their businesses or assets; and
- —
- at
all times preserve and keep in full force and effect their corporate existence and rights and franchises material to their performance under the merger agreement; and
- •
- Cimarex
will not directly or indirectly, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, do any of the following:
- —
- amend
or propose to amend its certificate of incorporation or bylaws or, in the case of its subsidiaries, their respective constituent documents;
- —
- split, combine or reclassify any outstanding shares of its capital stock;
I-123
- —
- declare,
set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution payable in cash, capital stock, property or otherwise with respect to any shares of its capital stock;
- —
- issue,
sell or agree to issue or sell or amend any shares of, or any options, warrants or rights of any kind to acquire any shares of, or any securities convertible into or
exchangeable for any shares of, its capital stock or other securities, except for shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding on the date of the merger agreement;
- —
- reduce
the exercise or conversion price or extend the time for exercise or conversion of any rights, options or warrants to acquire its securities, except as contractually
required;
- —
- purchase,
cancel, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock, other securities or other equity interests, except as permitted by the terms of Cimarex's
employee benefit plans;
- —
- merge
or consolidate with or transfer substantially all its assets to, any person except as contemplated by the merger agreement;
- —
- liquidate,
wind up or dissolve;
- —
- acquire
any interest in a business entity for a purchase price of $10,000,000 or more, other than interests in joint ventures, joint operation or ownership arrangements or
tax partnerships acquired in the ordinary course of business;
- —
- sell,
lease or sublease, transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any oil and gas interests or other assets of Cimarex that have a value of
$5,000,000 or more individually, except for the sale of hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business or encumbrances under Cimarex's credit facility;
- —
- farm-out
any oil and gas interest of Cimarex having a value of $2,000,000 or more;
- —
- sell,
transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any securities of any other person, including any capital stock or other securities or
equity interest in any of Cimarex's subsidiaries;
- —
- make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any person in an aggregate amount of $500,000 or more, other than in the ordinary course of
business;
- —
- enter
into any material agreement or any other agreement not terminable upon notice of 30 days or less and without penalty or other obligation;
- —
- permit
the outstanding indebtedness under Cimarex's credit facility to exceed $50,000,000;
- —
- incur
any indebtedness for borrowed money, other than under trade credit vendor lines not exceeding $1,000,000 in the aggregate or under Cimarex's credit facility;
- —
- incur
any other obligation or liability, other than in the ordinary course of business;
- —
- assume,
endorse (other than endorsements of negotiable instruments in the ordinary course of business), guarantee or otherwise become liable or responsible for the
liabilities or obligations of any other person in an amount of $500,000 or more, whether directly, contingently or otherwise, other than Cimarex guarantees of Cimarex Energy Services, Inc.
regarding obligations under transportation agreements;
- —
- enter into, amend or modify any derivative transactions;
I-124
- —
- voluntarily
resign, transfer or otherwise relinquish any right as operator of any oil and gas interest of Cimarex, except as required by law, regulation or contract or to
the extent the action would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Cimarex;
- —
- voluntarily
resign, transfer or otherwise relinquish any right with respect to any standstill agreement;
- —
- enter
into, or otherwise become liable or obligated under, or amend or extend:
- (A)
- any
employee benefit, pension or other plan (whether or not subject to ERISA),
- (B)
- any
other stock option, stock purchase, incentive or deferred compensation plan or arrangement or other fringe benefit plan, or
- (C)
- any
consulting, employment, severance, retention, termination or similar agreement with any person;
- —
- except
for payments made under any Cimarex employee benefit plan or any other plan, agreement or arrangement described in Cimarex's disclosure schedule, grant, or otherwise
become liable for or obligated to pay, any severance, retention or termination payment, bonus or increase in compensation or benefits (other than payments, bonuses or increases that are mandated by
the terms of agreements existing as of the date of the merger agreement or that are paid in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, and not individually or in the aggregate
material in amount) to, or forgive any indebtedness of, any employee or consultant of any of Cimarex or its subsidiaries;
- —
- enter
into any contract or commitment to do any of the things listed above;
- —
- create,
incur, assume or permit to exist any lien on any of its assets, except as permitted by the merger agreement;
- —
- take
any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the breach of any of Cimarex's representations and warranties, except as specifically permitted by the merger
agreement;
- —
- approve
or implement budgets for general and administrative expenses (including salary, bonuses, general operating and overhead expenses) or budgets for capital
expenditures, or incur expenses or disburse funds for any of those purposes except under the budgets which have been approved by Magnum Hunter or revisions to the budgets which are approved by Magnum
Hunter, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld;
- —
- except
to the extent already included in a budget approved by Magnum Hunter, enter into any agreements or other arrangements with respect to, or make any payments, incur any
expenses or disburse any funds for:
- (A)
- any
capital project, the completion or full capitalization of which can reasonably be expected to require Cimarex to expend, in the aggregate, $5,000,000 or more, or
- (B)
- any
capital project for the exploration of oil and gas interests with undeveloped reserves (including the acquisition of leasehold interests and seismic data, the drilling of wells
and all related costs and expenses) which can reasonably be expected to require Cimarex to expend, in the aggregate, $5,000,000 or more;
- —
- make any capital expenditure or general and administrative expense payment which, for any project, exceeds by more than 10 percent the amount set forth in the appropriate line item for that expenditure in a budget approved by Magnum Hunter; or
I-125
- —
- knowingly take, or agree to commit to take, any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the failure of a condition to Magnum Hunter's obligation to complete the merger, or that would materially impair or delay the ability of Magnum Hunter, Cimarex, Merger Sub or the holders of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock to complete the merger.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains customary representations and warranties, which are substantially reciprocal and expire upon completion of the merger. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:
- •
- corporate
organization and similar corporate matters of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- subsidiaries
of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- authorization,
execution, delivery, performance and enforceability of, and required consents, approvals, orders and authorizations of governmental authorities relating to,
the merger agreement and related matters of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- documents
filed by each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter with the SEC, and the accuracy of information contained in those documents;
- •
- financial
statements of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and the absence of undisclosed liabilities of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- the
capital structure of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- absence
of material adverse changes or events concerning each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- compliance
with applicable laws and material contracts by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- governmental
regulatory matters concerning each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- outstanding
and pending material litigation of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- existence
of financial restrictions upon each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- filing
of tax returns and payment of taxes by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- matters
relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act for Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and other employment and benefit plan matters;
- •
- insurance
policies held by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- title
to assets and intellectual property of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- estimates
of and reports relating to the oil and gas reserves of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- the
outstanding hydrocarbon and financial hedging positions of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- compliance
with the Natural Gas Act by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
- •
- compliance
by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter with environmental laws;
- •
- accuracy
of each of Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's books and records;
- •
- engagement and payment of fees of brokers, investment bankers, finders and financial advisors by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter;
I-126
- •
- the
stockholder vote of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter required to approve and adopt the merger agreement;
- •
- actions
taken by each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter to exempt the merger from applicable state anti-takeover laws and the parties' stockholder rights plans;
- •
- transactions
with affiliates by each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter; and
- •
- disclosure controls and procedures of each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter.
Employee Benefit Plans and Existing Agreements
The merger agreement provides that for six months after the closing date of the merger, Cimarex will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, continue to provide to each person who is employed by Magnum Hunter or any of its subsidiaries immediately before the effective time of the merger, employment (including base salary and incentive and bonus opportunities, but excluding equity-based compensation) and benefits (including vacation, paid time-off, medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment and disability benefits) that are substantially comparable in the aggregate to those provided to those employees by Magnum Hunter and its subsidiaries immediately before the effective time of the merger. Continuing employees do not include persons who have an employment agreement with Magnum Hunter. On and after October 1, 2005, each such continuing employee may, at Cimarex's option, be enrolled in one or more of Cimarex's employee benefit plans with benefits of similarly situated employees of Cimarex and its subsidiaries, rather than in any remaining Magnum Hunter plans. In addition, Cimarex has agreed that continuing Magnum Hunter employees will be eligible to participate in the Cimarex Energy Co. 401(k) Plan immediately after the effective time of the merger in accordance with the provisions of the Cimarex 401(k) plan, treating their service with Magnum Hunter as service with Cimarex.
The service of each Magnum Hunter employee with Magnum Hunter or its subsidiaries or any predecessor employer before the effective time of the merger will be treated as service with Cimarex and its subsidiaries for purposes of each employee benefit plan of Cimarex (including retirement, vacation, paid time-off and severance plans) in which the Magnum Hunter employee is eligible to participate after the effective time of the merger, including for purposes of eligibility, vesting and benefit levels and accruals (other than defined benefit pension plan accruals).
Following the effective time of the merger, for purposes of each employee benefit plan of Cimarex in which any Magnum Hunter employee or his or her eligible dependents is eligible to participate, Cimarex has agreed to, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries to:
- •
- waive
any pre-existing condition, exclusion, actively-at-work requirement or waiting period to the extent the condition, exclusion,
requirement or waiting period was satisfied or waived under the comparable employee benefit plan of Magnum Hunter as of the effective time of the merger or, if later, the date on which the employee
transitions to the Cimarex benefit plan; and
- •
- provide full credit for any co-payments, deductibles or similar payments made or incurred before the effective time of the merger for the plan year in which the effective time of the merger or the applicable plan transition date occurs.
Cimarex has agreed to, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries to, honor, in accordance with its terms, each Magnum Hunter severance policy or plan, including any rights or benefits arising as a result of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, either alone or in combination with any other event. In addition, the period of time during which severance may be triggered under the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Employee Severance Policy and the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy will be extended to the first anniversary of the closing of the merger. Cimarex also has agreed that the merger constitutes a change of control, change in
I-127
control or extraordinary transaction, as the case may be, for all purposes under those two Magnum Hunter employee benefit plans.
The parties have agreed that, before the effective time of the merger, Magnum Hunter will be entitled to amend, modify or terminate any nonqualified deferred compensation plan in order to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and any rules, regulations or other guidance promulgated thereunder by any governmental entity, and to adopt new plans that comply with Section 409A and contain substantially similar terms to the existing plans.
Following the effective time of the merger, Cimarex has agreed not to, and has agreed not to permit any of its subsidiaries or any of its or their respective officers or employees to, take any action (including the waiver of any term or condition of either of Magnum Hunter's deferred compensation plans discussed in the preceding paragraph) that results, or would be reasonably likely to result, in the imposition of any tax or interest penalty under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code on any current or former participant in either of Magnum Hunter's deferred compensation plans, including any "material modification" (within the meaning of Section 885(d)(2)(B) of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004) of any nonqualified deferred compensation plan of Magnum Hunter with respect to amounts deferred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005. Cimarex has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each current and former participant in any Magnum Hunter nonqualified deferred compensation plans, on an after-tax basis, from any tax or interest penalty imposed under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (or any successor or replacement provision thereto) to the extent imposed as a result of any failure of Cimarex, any of its subsidiaries or any of its or their respective officers or employees to comply with the provisions described in this paragraph.
Some Magnum Hunter executives have employment agreements including change in control provisions, which will require Cimarex to make payments to them upon voluntary termination of employment. In addition, outside directors of Magnum Hunter will become entitled to additional compensation at the effective time of the merger. See "—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Magnum Hunter Employment Agreement Change in Control Provisions" on page I-106.
Magnum Hunter will terminate its 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan before the closing date. The current trustee of the trust related to the plan is Gary Evans. The merger agreement requires that Gary Evans be removed and replaced by a qualified institutional trustee selected by Magnum Hunter and acceptable to Cimarex. On or before the plan's termination date, the new trustee will cause the plan to repay any existing loan(s) of the plan (in accordance with the terms of the loan, the plan, and applicable law, and in a manner mutually acceptable to Magnum Hunter and Cimarex). The plan administrator of the plan will allocate any unallocated assets remaining after the loan is repaid in accordance with the terms of the plan and applicable law. Upon termination of the plan, the accounts of all participants affected by the termination will become fully vested. The plan administrator will direct the trustee of the plan's related trust to distribute the assets remaining in the trust (after payment of any expenses properly allocable to the plan) to participants and beneficiaries after receipt of a favorable determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service related to the plan's termination. However, distributions will not be delayed until after receipt of a favorable determination letter for those participants who are otherwise entitled to a distribution under the plan by reason of death, disability, retirement, termination of employment or any other reason provided for under the terms of the plan (other than plan termination). Any distributions made after termination of the plan may be made (in whole or in part) in cash or in kind. Participants have the right, as provided in the plan document, to receive payment from their vested accounts under the plan in the form of Magnum Hunter common stock or, if the distribution occurs after the closing, Cimarex common stock (except to the extent of the value of any fractional shares, which will be distributed in cash). Cimarex has agreed to permit rollovers of participant distributions from the plan to a defined contribution plan maintained by Cimarex or one of its subsidiaries to the extent permitted under the terms of such plan.
I-128
Before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, and their respective boards of directors, have agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take all actions to cause any dispositions of Magnum Hunter common stock (including derivative securities with respect to Magnum Hunter common stock) or acquisitions of Cimarex common stock (including derivative securities with respect to Cimarex common stock) resulting from the merger by each individual who is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
The merger agreement may be amended by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter at any time either before or after approval of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by the respective boards of directors or stockholders of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter. However, after stockholder approval is obtained, no amendment requiring stockholder approval may be made without obtaining further stockholder approval. The merger agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties.
Any failure of any of the parties to the merger agreement to comply with any obligation, representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or condition in the merger agreement may be waived at any time before the effective time of the merger only by a written instrument signed by each party entitled to the benefit of the provision. Any waiver or failure to insist upon strict compliance with any obligation, representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or condition will not operate as a waiver with respect to any earlier or later breach of that provision or any other provision of the merger agreement.
Conversion of Merger Sub and Magnum Hunter Common Stock
At the effective time of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of Merger Sub common stock will be converted into one share of common stock of the surviving corporation.
Also at the effective time of the merger:
- (1)
- Each
issued and outstanding share of Magnum Hunter common stock, other than shares to be canceled under paragraph (2) below, will be canceled and converted automatically into
the right to receive 0.415 of a fully paid and nonassessable share of Cimarex common stock. This ratio is referred to as the exchange ratio. As of the effective time of the merger, all shares of
Magnum Hunter common stock will no longer be outstanding and will automatically be canceled and cease to exist, and each holder of a certificate representing any shares of Magnum Hunter common stock
will cease to have any rights with respect to those shares, except the right to receive the exchange ratio and any cash instead of fractional shares of Cimarex common stock to be issued or paid upon
surrender of the certificate in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, without interest.
- (2)
- Each
share of Magnum Hunter common stock held directly by Magnum Hunter (but not shares held by its subsidiaries) will be canceled without conversion and no payment or distribution
will be made with respect to those shares.
- (3)
- All of the issued and outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock will be canceled and converted automatically into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 20 shares of Cimarex common stock, referred to as the Series A merger consideration. Based upon the 80,000 shares of Series A preferred stock currently outstanding, holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock would receive 0.00025 of a share of Cimarex common stock for each share of Series A preferred stock that they own immediately before the effective time of the merger. As of the effective time of the merger, all shares of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock will no longer be outstanding and will automatically be canceled and cease to
I-129
exist, and each holder of a certificate representing any shares of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock will cease to have any rights with respect to those shares, except the right to receive the Series A merger consideration upon surrender of the certificate in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, without interest. Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stockholders may receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock. See "—Exchange of Shares; Fractional Shares—Series A Preferred Stockholders" below.
Exchange of Shares; Fractional Shares
General Exchange Procedure
Before the merger, Cimarex will appoint Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company as exchange agent to effect the exchange of certificates representing shares of Magnum Hunter common stock and Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock for certificates representing shares of Cimarex common stock. Following the merger, Cimarex will deposit with the exchange agent certificates representing Cimarex common stock and cash for fractional shares that would otherwise be issued to holders of Magnum Hunter common stock.
As soon as reasonably practicable after the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will mail to record holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and, to the extent their addresses are known, Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock letters of transmittal and instructions explaining how to surrender their stock certificates to the exchange agent. Upon surrender to the exchange agent of their stock certificates, together with a properly completed and signed letter of transmittal and any other documents required by the instructions to the letter of transmittal, the holders of record of the common stock or Series A preferred stock represented by those certificates will be entitled to receive the exchange ratio or the Series A merger consideration, as applicable, and each certificate surrendered will be canceled.
Holders of unexchanged Magnum Hunter stock certificates will not receive any dividends or other distributions made by Cimarex with a record date after the effective time of the merger until their stock certificates are surrendered. Upon surrender, however, subject to applicable laws, those holders will receive all dividends and distributions made on the related shares of Cimarex common stock after the merger, without interest, together with, if applicable, cash instead of fractional shares.
Magnum Hunter stockholders should not return their stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card and should not forward their stock certificates to the exchange agent except with a signed letter of transmittal and any other documents that may be required by the exchange agent, as provided in the instructions that will accompany the letter of transmittal. The letter of transmittal will be provided to Magnum Hunter stockholders following the closing of the merger.
Cimarex stockholders will not exchange their stock certificates in the merger.
Common Stockholders
No fractional shares of Cimarex common stock will be issued to holders of Magnum Hunter common stock in the merger. Instead of fractional shares, each holder of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will receive cash in an amount equal to the product of:
- •
- such
fractional part of a share multiplied by
- •
- the average of the closing prices of Cimarex common stock on the NYSE over the 20 trading day period ending on the fourth trading day before the closing date of the merger.
No interest will be paid in connection with the exchange of fractional shares.
I-130
Series A Preferred Stockholders
Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stockholders will receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger to the extent necessary. In the alternative, Cimarex may elect in its sole discretion to offer Series A preferred stockholders who would otherwise receive fractional shares one or both of the following options:
- •
- the
right to purchase an additional fraction of a share of Cimarex common stock sufficient to provide the holder with a whole share, at the closing sales price of Cimarex
common stock on the NYSE on the day immediately before the holder's acceptance of this right; and/or
- •
- the establishment of an agency arrangement which combines fractional shares held by participating Series A preferred stockholders into whole shares, sells those shares for the account of the participating holders to a party other than Cimarex or its subsidiaries or affiliates, and then distributes the resulting sales proceeds to the participating holders in proportion to their contributed fractional share interests, with related transaction costs to be borne by Cimarex.
Cimarex may offer either or both of these alternatives to Series A preferred stockholders at any time until the third anniversary of the closing date of the merger. These provisions do not prevent Cimarex from offering other alternatives to Series A preferred stockholders who receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock. Cimarex is not permitted to force Series A preferred stockholders who receive fractional shares of Cimarex common stock to receive cash in respect of their fractional shares.
Cancellation or Assumption of Stock Options
Magnum Hunter has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain consent to cancel options to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock from all holders of options that require consent for cancellation of the options. Magnum Hunter also will cause all stock options that do not require consent for cancellation to be canceled as of the effective time of the merger. As of April 15, 2005, the record date for the Magnum Hunter special meeting, Magnum Hunter had options to purchase 4,888,931 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock outstanding, with an average exercise price of approximately $8.05 per share. Magnum Hunter estimates that 2,000 of these options require consent for cancellation.
At the effective time of the merger, the holder of each canceled stock option will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the product of the total number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option (whether vested or unvested), times the excess, if any, of the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date over the exercise price of the option, less the amount of any required withholding taxes. Any cash payments to option holders will be made by Magnum Hunter or, at Cimarex's option, by Cimarex. Options with exercise prices higher than the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date will not be entitled to any cash payment. The closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on April 15, 2005, the record date for the Magnum Hunter special meeting, was $14.54. If the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock is the same on the day before the closing date of the merger, Magnum Hunter estimates that options to purchase 4,888,931 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will have an exercise price that is less than the closing price, and Magnum Hunter or Cimarex will be required to make an aggregate cash payment of approximately $31.8 million.
If Magnum Hunter does not receive consent before the effective time to cancel any options that require consent for cancellation, those options will be assumed by Cimarex. Assumed options will be converted into an option to purchase that number of shares of Cimarex common stock determined by multiplying the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock subject to the option at the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio. The exercise price per share of each assumed
I-131
option will be equal to the exercise price per share of the existing option divided by the exchange ratio. Each assumed option will remain subject to the same conditions that applied before the merger, except that each option will be fully vested. Before the effective time of the merger, Magnum Hunter's board will take action to fully vest all outstanding options to purchase shares of Magnum Hunter common stock.
Promptly following the effective time of the merger, Cimarex has agreed to cause the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon exercise of the assumed stock options to be registered with the SEC, and will use all reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of that registration statement for so long as any assumed options remain outstanding.
Treatment of Indenture Obligations and Notes
The indentures under which Magnum Hunter's $195 million 9.6% senior notes due 2012 and $125 million floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023 were issued permit the holders of the notes to sell their notes back to Magnum Hunter within 30-45 days following delivery of notice of a change of control of Magnum Hunter, for a price equal to 101% and 100% of their principal amount, respectively, plus accrued interest. The interest rate on the convertible senior notes is a floating interest rate based on three-month LIBOR, which as of December 31, 2004 was 2.49%. Notice of a change of control must be delivered within 30 days following the change of control. The merger qualifies as a change of control for these purposes. Magnum Hunter as the surviving corporation will be obligated to buy back any notes that are offered back to Magnum Hunter in accordance with these provisions. If all of the outstanding notes are offered, the total repurchase costs, as of December 31, 2004, would have been approximately $327.6 million.
At or before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will enter into a supplemental indenture with the trustee of the convertible senior notes regarding the conversion provisions. Holders of the convertible senior notes will be entitled for 30 calendar days following the effective date of the merger to convert their notes into cash and a number of shares of Cimarex common stock that they would have received had they converted their notes into cash and shares of Magnum Hunter common stock immediately before the merger.
The convertible notes will be convertible into a combination of cash and common stock of Cimarex upon the happening of certain events, including the merger. This means that holders of these notes will be able to convert the notes for 30 calendar days following the merger. In general, upon conversion of a convertible note, the holder would receive cash equal to the principal amount of the convertible note and Cimarex common stock for the convertible note's conversion value in excess of the principal amount. The number of shares of Cimarex common stock into which the convertible notes are convertible will depend upon the conversion value in excess of the principal amount of the convertible notes and Cimarex's future common stock price. Based upon an assumed Cimarex stock price of $37.66 per share (the average stock price of Cimarex used in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus), the convertible senior notes would be convertible into an aggregate of 933,750 shares of Cimarex common stock following the merger. Beyond the 30 calendar days following the effective date of the merger, the convertible senior notes will be similarly convertible into cash equal to the principal amount of the convertible senior notes and common stock of Cimarex for the conversion value in excess of the principal amount upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in the indenture. However, the convertible senior notes will
I-132
remain obligations of Magnum Hunter as the surviving corporation in the merger. The convertible senior notes are convertible as follows:
- •
- Upon
the occurrence of certain events set forth in the indenture, all of the notes may be converted into Cimarex common stock and cash, the conversion value of which is
equal to the product of:
- (i)
- (A)
the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be converted divided by 1,000, multiplied by (B) the conversion rate (the initial conversion rate is 82.0345
(which will be adjusted to 34.4971 following the merger, assuming the TEL Offshore Trust distribution has been made)); and
- (ii)
- the
10-day average closing price beginning on the second trading day following the day the notes are tendered for conversion.
- •
- Assuming
the 10-day average closing price is higher than $12.19 (which will be adjusted to $28.99 following the merger, assuming the TEL Offshore Trust
distribution has been made), the combined company must pay the conversion value as follows:
- (i)
- cash
equal to the aggregate principal amount of the notes converted;
- (ii)
- shares
of Cimarex common stock equal to the conversion value less the cash paid for the principal amount of the notes converted; and
- (iii)
- cash instead of any fractional shares of Cimarex common stock.
This $12.19 conversion price will be adjusted to $12.03 upon the distribution of TEL Offshore Trust units to Magnum Hunter's common stockholders and further adjusted to $28.99 following the merger.
Cimarex is not required to enter into any supplemental indenture with respect to Magnum Hunter's 9.6% senior notes, which will remain obligations of Magnum Hunter as the surviving corporation in the merger.
Before the effective time of the merger, Cimarex will file a registration statement with the SEC covering the shares of Cimarex common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible senior notes. Cimarex has agreed to use all reasonable efforts to have such registration statement declared effective at the effective time of the merger and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement for so long as any convertible senior notes remain outstanding.
The following description summarizes the material provisions of the voting agreement. Stockholders should read the full text of the voting agreement, which is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated herein by reference.
General
As of March 31, 2005, Gary C. Evans, Magnum Hunter's former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc., a related entity whose sole stockholder is Mr. Evans' wife, collectively beneficially owned and were entitled to vote 3,943,794 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, including shares subject to then-currently exercisable options and warrants. These shares represented approximately 4.1% of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock on that date. Simultaneously with the execution of the merger agreement, these stockholders entered into a voting agreement with Cimarex, as described more fully below.
I-133
Voting
Under the voting agreement, each of the stockholders has agreed, among other things, to vote his or its shares of Magnum Hunter common stock:
- •
- in
favor of the approval of the merger agreement;
- •
- against
any action or agreement that the stockholders would reasonably expect to result in a material breach of any covenant, representation, warranty or other obligation of
Magnum Hunter under the merger agreement; and
- •
- against any other takeover proposal, including a superior proposal.
No Transfer of Shares
Each of the stockholders has agreed not to transfer, offer or agree to transfer, grant any proxy over or enter into any voting arrangement with respect to any of its shares of Magnum Hunter common stock without Cimarex's advance written consent. Under the voting agreement, transfers include gifts, pledges and other dispositions as well as sales. Cimarex may not unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its consent in the case of a gift or estate planning transaction. Each of the stockholders has also agreed that the voting agreement and their obligations under the voting agreement will be binding upon any person to which legal or beneficial ownership of their shares shall pass, whether by operation of law or otherwise.
Termination
The voting agreement will terminate upon the earliest of:
- •
- the
effective time of the merger;
- •
- the
termination of the merger agreement; and
- •
- July 25, 2005, or October 1, 2005 if the SEC has not declared the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part effective by June 1, 2005.
Organizational Documents, Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation
The merger agreement states that the articles of incorporation of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately before the effective time of the merger, will be the articles of incorporation of the surviving corporation until thereafter amended. The bylaws of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately before the effective time of the merger, will be the bylaws of the surviving corporation until thereafter amended. The directors and officers of Merger Sub immediately before the effective time of the merger will be the directors and officers of the surviving corporation until their respective successors have been duly elected or appointed.
I-134
OTHER MERGER-RELATED PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED
AT THE CIMAREX ANNUAL MEETING
Proposal to Amend the Cimarex Charter to Increase the Authorized Common Stock
Cimarex presently is authorized to issue 115 million shares of capital stock, divided into 100 million shares of common stock and 15 million shares of preferred stock. As of April 29, 2005, approximately 41,786,219 shares of Cimarex common stock were issued and outstanding. As of April 29, 2005, a total of approximately 2,598,460 shares of Cimarex common stock were available for delivery in the future in respect of awards that have been or are authorized to be made under Cimarex's stock-based compensation plans, which amount did not include an estimated 8,000 shares that would become issuable upon conversion of existing Magnum Hunter stock options that Cimarex may assume in the merger. Based upon the number of shares of Magnum Hunter common stock outstanding on April 15, 2005, approximately 39.5 million shares of Cimarex common stock are estimated to be issued in the merger upon the conversion of Magnum Hunter common stock (excluding 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter) and Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock. As of April 29, 2005, no shares of preferred stock of Cimarex were issued and no other class of capital stock of Cimarex was authorized.
The board of directors of Cimarex has approved an amendment to the Cimarex charter to increase the number of authorized shares of Cimarex common stock from 100 million to 200 million. Cimarex has a sufficient number of authorized shares under the Cimarex charter to complete the merger. Therefore, approval of the amendment to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock is not a condition to the merger. However, the amendment will not be effected unless the merger takes place.
Cimarex believes that an increase is advisable and in the best interests of Cimarex and its stockholders. Following the merger, in the event that the amendment to the Cimarex charter is not approved, Cimarex will have approximately 17.5 million authorized and unissued shares of Cimarex common stock, a significant number of which will be reserved for issuance upon exercise of options to purchase Cimarex common stock (including the Magnum Hunter options assumed in the merger) and upon conversion of Magnum Hunter's convertible senior notes. Cimarex believes that an increase in authorized shares of Cimarex common stock to 200 million will give Cimarex greater flexibility in the future by allowing Cimarex the latitude to declare stock dividends or stock splits, to use its common stock to acquire other assets (for example, transactions similar to the merger) or to issue its common stock for other corporate purposes, including raising additional capital or issuances under employee and director stock plans. There are no current plans, understandings or arrangements for issuing a material number of additional shares of Cimarex common stock from the additional shares proposed to be authorized under the amendment.
The issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock, including the additional shares that would be authorized if the proposed amendment is adopted, may dilute the present equity ownership position of current holders of Cimarex common stock and may be made without stockholder approval, unless otherwise required by applicable laws or stock exchange regulations. The amendment might also have the effect of discouraging an attempt by another person or entity through the acquisition of a substantial number of shares of Cimarex common stock, to acquire control of Cimarex with a view to consummating a merger, sale of all or any part of Cimarex's assets, or a similar transaction, because the issuance of new shares could be used to dilute the stock ownership of the person or entity.
All shares of Cimarex common stock, including those now authorized and those that would be authorized by the proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter, are equal in rank and have the same voting, dividend and liquidation rights. Holders of Cimarex common stock do not have preemptive rights.
I-135
Under Cimarex's stockholder rights plan, one Series A junior participating preferred stock purchase right will be issued with each share of Cimarex common stock. See "Description of Cimarex's Capital Stock—Stockholder Rights Plan."
By unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting, the Cimarex board of directors has recommended that Cimarex stockholders vote "FOR" approval of the amendment to the Cimarex charter to increase the number of authorized shares of Cimarex common stock.
To effect the increase in authorized shares of Cimarex common stock, it is proposed that the first sentence of Article Fourth of Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 215,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of (i) Two Hundred Million (200,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), and (ii) Fifteen Million (15,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Preferred Stock")."
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock is required to approve this amendment to the Cimarex charter. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by the Cimarex board of directors will be voted for the amendment.
Proposal to Amend the Cimarex Charter to Increase the Maximum Number of Directors
The Cimarex charter and bylaws presently provide for a board of directors consisting of at least six and not more than nine members. Currently, Cimarex's board consists of nine directors, the maximum number permitted. In connection with the merger agreement, Cimarex has agreed to add to its board one current director of Magnum Hunter, to be selected by Cimarex. Accordingly, in order to add the Magnum Hunter director to its board, Cimarex must either increase the maximum size of its board or ask one of its directors then in office to leave the board.
The Cimarex board of directors has approved an amendment to the Cimarex charter and the Cimarex bylaws to increase the maximum number of directors from nine to ten. Approval of this amendment is not a condition to the merger, but the amendment will not be effected unless the merger takes place. Cimarex believes that an increase in the permitted board size is advisable and in the best interests of Cimarex and its stockholders. By increasing the maximum number of directors, Cimarex will be able to add the new director, as it has agreed in the merger agreement, without losing the valuable experience and perspective of any of its current board members.
This amendment may increase the chances of board deadlock, since Cimarex will have ten directors in office following the merger and the possibility of a tie vote will exist. This amendment also will cause Cimarex's director classes to be of unequal size, since one class will have four directors and each of the other two classes will have three directors.
By unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting, the Cimarex board of directors has recommended that Cimarex stockholders vote "FOR" approval of the amendment to the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum number of directors permitted to serve on the Cimarex board.
To effect the increase in the maximum size of the Cimarex board of directors, it is proposed that the first sentence of Section 3(a) of Article Fifth of Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"The number of directors of the Corporation shall be at least six and not more than ten, with the exact number to be from time to time fixed by resolution adopted by a majority of the entire Board of Directors."
I-136
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock is required to approve this amendment to the Cimarex charter. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by the Cimarex board of directors will be voted for the amendment.
Proposal to Amend the Cimarex Incentive Plan
Summary of the Proposal
Effective October 1, 2002, the Cimarex board of directors and H&P, the sole stockholder of Cimarex at the time, adopted the Cimarex Energy Co. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. On March 3, 2003, the board of directors of Cimarex adopted the amended and restated incentive plan, providing for the ability of Cimarex to issue stock units. Cimarex's stockholders approved the Cimarex incentive plan on May 28, 2003.
The amended Cimarex incentive plan provides for the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock and stock units to all eligible employees and directors of Cimarex and its affiliates. As of December 31, 2004, Cimarex had approximately 363 eligible employees and eight non-employee directors, and stock options and restricted stock had been granted to 55 employees and eight non-employee directors.
The Cimarex incentive plan was established to create incentives that are designed to motivate participants to put forth maximum effort toward the success and growth of Cimarex and to enable Cimarex to attract and retain experienced individuals who by their position, ability and diligence are able to make important contributions to the success of Cimarex.
The Cimarex board of directors has approved an amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan to:
- (1)
- increase
the number of shares of Cimarex common stock reserved for issuance under the Cimarex incentive plan by 5.7 million shares; and
- (2)
- provide that a grant of one share of restricted stock or one restricted stock unit will reduce the 5.7 million share reserve by 2 shares and that a grant of one share pursuant to an option grant under the incentive plan will reduce the 5.7 million share reserve by one share.
Approval of the amendment to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan is not a condition to the merger. If approved, the amendment will be implemented whether or not the merger takes place.
In addition, Cimarex plans to ask its board of directors to approve amendments to the Cimarex incentive plan to:
- •
- provide
that the closing of the merger will not be a change in control for purposes of the incentive plan; and
- •
- change the definition of disability to conform to the definition of disability in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which became effective January 1, 2005.
These latter two amendments do not require stockholder approval and will apply only to those individuals who have waived the acceleration of vesting and payment of their grants under the incentive plan upon the closing of the merger.
The issuance of options to purchase Cimarex common stock or other stock grants under the Cimarex incentive plan, including the additional shares that would be authorized if the proposed amendment is adopted, may dilute the present equity ownership position of current holders of Cimarex common stock and may be made without further stockholder approval, unless otherwise required by applicable laws or regulations.
I-137
By unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting, the Cimarex board of directors has recommended that Cimarex stockholders vote "FOR" approval of the amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan.
The full text of the proposed amendment to the Cimarex Energy Co. Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan is included as Annex G to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated herein by reference.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting is required to approve the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan.
Summary of the Cimarex Incentive Plan
Administration of the Plan. The governance committee of Cimarex, referred to as the committee, administers the Cimarex incentive plan. The committee is comprised solely of non-employee directors.
The committee has the exclusive power to select the participants to be granted awards, determines the time or times when awards will be made, and determines the form of an award, the number of shares of common stock of Cimarex subject to the award, and all the terms, conditions (including performance requirements), restrictions and/or limitations, if any, of awards, including the time and conditions of exercise or vesting, with the following exceptions:
- •
- the
maximum number of shares subject to one or more options that may be granted during any calendar year to any participant is 1,000,000 shares of common stock;
- •
- the
maximum number of shares that may be awarded to participants as restricted stock awards with respect to the initial 7,000,000 share reserve is 1,000,000 shares of common
stock, and, if the proposal is approved by Cimarex stockholders, the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to participants as restricted stock awards with respect to the additional 5,700,000
share reserve is 2,850,000 shares of common stock; and
- •
- the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Cimarex incentive plan is 7,000,000 shares of common stock, or 12,700,000 shares of common stock if the proposal is approved by Cimarex stockholders.
The Cimarex incentive plan provides that the committee may delegate authority to specified officers of Cimarex to grant awards under the plan, provided no grants of awards may be granted to any eligible employee who is covered by Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. Under that authority, on December 6, 2002, the committee delegated authority to F.H. Merelli to grant restricted stock awards to employees (other than employees covered by Section 16(b)) who he deems, in his sole discretion, to have made significant contributions to Cimarex. The restricted stock awards that Mr. Merelli may grant vest on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant, and the shares may not be sold before the eighth anniversary of the date of grant. Mr. Merelli may determine, in his sole discretion, the number of shares that may be granted to each employee. The aggregate maximum number of shares subject to Mr. Merelli's discretion is 100,000. He may make only one grant to an employee. His discretionary authority terminates on December 6, 2007.
Shares Subject to the Plan. There are currently 7,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for the grant of awards under the Cimarex incentive plan, of which no more than 1,000,000 may be awarded as restricted stock awards. If the proposal is approved, 5,700,000 additional shares of common stock will be reserved for grant under the plan. After considering exercises and forfeitures under the plan, as of December 31, 2004, there were 2,441,521 shares of common stock available for grant under the plan, of which 128,256 shares were available for restricted stock awards. If the proposal is approved, Cimarex will have an additional 5,700,000 shares available for grants under the incentive plan immediately
I-138
following the merger, provided that a grant of one share of restricted stock or one restricted stock unit will reduce the 5,700,000 million share reserve by two shares and a grant of one share pursuant to an option grant will reduce the 5,700,000 million share reserve by one share.
Adjustment of Shares. The number of shares available under and subject to the Cimarex incentive plan, and each share reserved for issuance under the plan, are subject to adjustment on account of stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and other dilutive changes in Cimarex's common stock, except that an adjustment will only be made if the event would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the number of shares available under the plan or to which any award relates. Any adjustment representing a change of less than 1% will be carried forward and made as soon as the adjustment together with other adjustments would result in a change of more than 1%. Any shares of Cimarex common stock related to awards that terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise or are exchanged for awards not involving common stock and any shares withheld for the payment of taxes will be available again for grant under the plan.
No Repricing of Options. The committee may at any time unilaterally amend the terms of any award agreement, provided that any such amendment which is adverse to the participant will require the participant's consent. The committee will not, without the approval of Cimarex's stockholders, cancel any outstanding option and replace it with a new option with a lower option price where the economic effect would be the same as reducing the option price of the cancelled option, or take any other action with respect to an option that would be treated as a "repricing" under applicable accounting rules or under the rules of the SEC.
Exercise of Options. The committee determines the exercise price for each option, but no option will be granted at an exercise price that is less than the fair market value of Cimarex common stock on the date of grant. An option holder may exercise an option by written notice and payment of the exercise price in cash or by check, bank, draft or money order payable to the order of Cimarex, by delivering mature shares of common stock having a fair market value on the date of payment equal to the amount of the exercise price (but only to the extent the delivery of shares would not result in an accounting compensation charge), or a combination of the foregoing. In addition, any option may be exercised by a broker-dealer acting on behalf of the participant if the broker-dealer has received from the participant a notice of exercise and adequate provision has been made with respect to the payment of any withholding taxes due upon exercise. Option holders may elect to satisfy the minimum required income tax withholding obligation through the withholding of a portion of the common stock to be received upon exercise of the option.
Option Term. The committee determines the period and the conditions of exercisability, the minimum periods during which participants must be employed by Cimarex or must hold options before they may be exercised, the minimum periods during which shares acquired upon exercise must be held before sale, conditions under which the options or shares may be subject to forfeiture, the frequency of exercise or the minimum or maximum number of shares that may be acquired at any one time, the achievement by Cimarex of specified performance criteria and non-compete and protection of business matters. Incentive stock options must expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant. If a participant's employment terminates on or after his or her 62nd birthday, death or disability, the participant will be entitled to purchase all or any part of the shares subject to any vested incentive stock option for a period of up to three months from the date of termination (one year in the case of death or disability) and vested nonqualified stock option during the remaining term of the option.
Restoration Grant. At the time an option is granted, the committee may provide that if the option holder pays the option exercise price by surrendering mature shares of common stock or if the option holder pays the required minimum tax withholding with shares of common stock, the option holder will be granted an option, referred to as a restoration option, as of the date the original option was exercised. This restoration option will be for the same number of shares that are surrendered (or
I-139
withheld) to pay the exercise price and/or required withholding, and will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Cimarex common stock on the date the original option was exercised and will have the same terms and conditions as the original option. A restoration option will be granted only if there is at least six months remaining in the term of the original option. Restoration options will be non-qualified options, will expire at the same time as the original option or earlier if the option holder terminates employment and will vest six months from the date the restoration option was granted. Restoration options will only be exercisable if the option holder is employed on the date of exercise, and has been employed continuously by Cimarex or an affiliate since the date the restoration option was granted. The committee also has the discretion to set additional policies and procedures related to the exercise of a restoration option.
Restricted Stock. The committee may grant a participant a number of shares of restricted stock as determined by the committee in its sole discretion. In addition to any vesting conditions determined by the committee, vesting of each award will require the holder to remain employed by Cimarex for such period of time as determined by the committee, but in no event less than three years. The committee may also, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting under such circumstances as it deems appropriate. The restricted stock agreements provide that, during the vesting period, if Cimarex pays a dividend on its common stock, the grantees will be entitled to receive the dividend. Cimarex does not currently intend to pay dividends on its common stock.
Stock Units. The committee may grant stock units to participants. Each stock unit is a measurement unit that is equal to the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date the stock unit is granted. The committee determines the number of stock units to be granted, the vesting conditions and other restrictions, if any, the time and manner of payment, and any other terms and conditions of the stock units. The committee may also, in its sole discretion, accelerate vesting and waive other restrictions and conditions under such circumstances as it deems appropriate.
Nontransferability. Except as may otherwise be provided by the committee at the time of a grant, an option will not be transferable except by will or pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution or incident to a divorce pursuant to a property settlement agreement between spouses or a final order of a court. The holder of a restricted stock award may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of the shares of common stock represented by the restricted stock award during the applicable restriction period.
Amendment and Termination. The Cimarex board of directors may alter, suspend or terminate the Cimarex incentive plan at any time and may, from time to time, amend the plan in any manner, but may not without stockholder approval adopt any amendment that would increase the aggregate number of shares of common stock available under the plan or modify any provision of the plan that would materially increase the benefit or rights of any participant in the plan. In addition, the rules of the NYSE, on which Cimarex's common stock is listed, require stockholder approval of material amendments to the plan.
Change of Control. Awards (options, restricted stock or stock units) granted under the Cimarex incentive plan to any participant will be immediately and automatically vested, fully earned and exercisable upon the occurrence of a change of control, as defined in the plan. The committee may provide that any awards that are outstanding at the time of the change of control will expire at the time of the closing so long as the participants are provided with at least 45 days' advance notice of the expiration.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Grant and Exercise of Options. Certain of the federal income tax consequences applicable to the grant and exercise of non-qualified stock options and incentive stock options are as follows:
I-140
- •
- the
fair market value of common stock on the date the incentive stock option was exercised or, if less, the amount received on the disposition, over
- •
- the exercise price.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. There are no income tax consequences to the participant or to Cimarex when the non-qualified stock option is granted. When a non-qualified stock option is exercised, in general, the participant recognizes compensation, subject to wage withholding, equal to the excess of the fair market value of common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price. Cimarex is generally entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant, assuming that the compensation satisfies the ordinary and necessary and reasonable compensation requirements for deductibility and that the deduction is not limited by Section 162(m) of the Code.
Incentive Stock Options. When an incentive stock option is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the participant or Cimarex. When an incentive stock option is exercised, the participant does not recognize income and Cimarex does not receive a deduction. The participant, however, must treat the excess of the fair market value of Cimarex common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price as an item of adjustment for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If the participant makes a "disqualifying disposition" of the common stock (described below) in the same taxable year the incentive stock option was exercised, there are no alternative minimum tax consequences.
If the participant disposes of common stock after the participant has held the Cimarex common stock for at least two years after the incentive stock option was granted and at least one year after the incentive stock option was exercised, the amount the participant receives upon the disposition over the exercise price is treated as capital gain. Cimarex is not entitled to a deduction. If the participant makes a "disqualifying disposition" of common stock by disposing of common stock before it has been held for at least two years after the date the incentive stock option was granted and at least one year after the date the incentive stock option was exercised, the participant recognizes compensation income equal to the excess of:
At present, Cimarex is not required to withhold income or other taxes in connection with a "disqualifying disposition." Cimarex is generally entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant, assuming that the compensation satisfies the ordinary and necessary and reasonable compensation requirements for deductibility and that the deduction is not limited by Section 162(m) of the Code.
Stock Plan Benefits Table
For information about the stock options, restricted stock awards, stock units and other equity compensation under Cimarex's equity plans as of December 31, 2004, see "Chapter II—The Cimarex Annual Meeting Proposals—Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information (as of December 31, 2004)" on page II-7.
New Plan Benefits
Because awards under the Cimarex incentive plan are discretionary, future awards are generally not determinable at this time.
I-141
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter are providing the following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements to present the results of operations and financial position of the combined company giving effect to the merger as though Cimarex's and Magnum Hunter's businesses had been combined at the dates indicated and for the periods shown.
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that each company's management believes are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and are based on the estimates and assumptions set forth in the notes accompanying those statements. The companies may have performed differently had they always been combined. Stockholders should not rely on this information as being indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results of the combined company after the merger. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter incorporated by reference and included, respectively, in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9 and "Chapter IV—Magnum Hunter Business and Financial Information" beginning on page IV-1 .
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared based on the following assumptions:
- •
- Cimarex
issued an aggregate of approximately 36.3 million shares of Cimarex common stock (at an exchange ratio of 0.415 shares of Cimarex common stock for each share
of Magnum Hunter common stock) for all the outstanding shares of common stock of Magnum Hunter (excluding 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter), and
assumed Magnum Hunter's debt.
- •
- The
unaudited pro forma balance sheet has been prepared as if the merger occurred on December 31, 2004. The unaudited pro forma statements of operations have been
prepared as if the merger occurred on January 1, 2004.
- •
- The
merger was accounted for as a purchase of Magnum Hunter by Cimarex.
- •
- Any
potential cost savings have not been reflected as an adjustment to the historical data. These cost savings, if any, would result from the consolidation of certain
offices and the elimination of duplicate corporate and field-level staff and expenses.
- •
- See "—The Merger Agreement—Treatment of Indenture Obligations and Notes" on page I-132. Any potential buyback or conversion of these notes has not been reflected as an adjustment in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. For a 10% increase above Magnum Hunter's share price of $12.19, approximately 363,000 Cimarex shares could potentially be issued related to Magnum Hunter's $125 million floating rate convertible senior notes due 2023, if those notes were converted.
I-142
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
December 31, 2004
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter |
Pro Forma Adjustments (Note 3) |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of Dollars) |
||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||
| Current assets | $ | 236.4 | $ | 139.5 | $ | (20.0 | )(a) | $ | 355.9 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment—net | 818.4 | 1,496.9 | 479.1 | (a) | 2,794.4 | ||||||||||
| Other assets | 5.6 | 9.6 | 15.2 | ||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 45.0 | 56.5 | 590.1 | (a) | 691.6 | ||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 1,105.4 | $ | 1,702.5 | $ | 1,049.2 | $ | 3,857.1 | |||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 143.0 | $ | 144.8 | $ | 57.5 | (a) | $ | 345.3 | ||||||
| Long-term debt | — | 643.0 | 53.0 | (a) | 696.0 | ||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 225.3 | 188.4 | 251.5 | (a) | 665.2 | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 36.4 | 46.5 | — | 82.9 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 404.7 | 1,022.7 | 362.0 | 1,789.4 | |||||||||||
| Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Common stock | .4 | .2 | .4 .3 (.2 |
(a) (b) )(c) |
1.1 | ||||||||||
| Additional paid-in-capital | 250.3 | 615.0 | 1,366.6 29.5 (615.0 |
(a) (b) )(c) |
1,646.4 | ||||||||||
| Retained earnings | 460.0 | 108.6 | (108.6 | )(c) | 460.0 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | .1 | (12.6 | ) | 12.6 | (c) | .1 | |||||||||
| Shares of common stock to be held by subsidiary | — | — | (29.8 | )(b) | (29.8 | ) | |||||||||
| Other | (10.1 | ) | (31.4 | ) | 31.4 | (c) | (10.1 | ) | |||||||
| Total Stockholders' Equity | 700.7 | 679.8 | 687.2 | 2,067.7 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 1,105.4 | $ | 1,702.5 | $ | 1,049.2 | $ | 3,857.1 | |||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
I-143
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter (Note 6) |
Pro Forma Adjustments (Note 3) |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||
| Revenues | |||||||||||||||
| Oil and gas sales | $ | 472.4 | $ | 443.4 | $ | — | $ | 915.8 | |||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | 195.8 | 41.9 | — | 237.7 | |||||||||||
| Oil field services | — | 8.4 | — | 8.4 | |||||||||||
| Other | 6.7 | 2.9 | — | 9.6 | |||||||||||
| 674.9 | 496.6 | — | 1,171.5 | ||||||||||||
| Costs and Expenses | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 125.5 | 127.2 | 89.0 | (d) | 341.7 | ||||||||||
| Production | 37.5 | 78.3 | — | 115.8 | |||||||||||
| Taxes other than income | 37.8 | 26.4 | — | 64.2 | |||||||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | 203.3 | 29.1 | — | 232.4 | |||||||||||
| Oil field services | — | 5.0 | — | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| General and administrative | 24.4 | 22.1 | 46.5 | ||||||||||||
| Non-cash hedging adjustments | — | (1.1 | ) | — | (1.1 | ) | |||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt | — | 12.2 | — | 12.2 | |||||||||||
| Financing costs | .1 | 38.1 | (4.6 | )(e) | 33.6 | ||||||||||
| Total Costs and Expenses | 428.6 | 337.3 | 84.4 | 850.3 | |||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 246.3 | 159.3 | (84.4 | ) | 321.2 | ||||||||||
| Income tax expense | (92.7 | ) | (55.7 | ) | 30.9 | (f) | (117.5 | ) | |||||||
| Net income | $ | 153.6 | $ | 103.6 | $ | (53.5 | ) | $ | 203.7 | ||||||
| Net income per share: | |||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 3.70 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 2.62 | |||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 3.59 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 2.58 | |||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||
| Basic | 41.5 | 77.0 | 77.8 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted | 42.8 | 79.0 | 79.1 | ||||||||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
I-144
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited pro forma balance sheet and statements of operations present the pro forma effects of the merger. The balance sheet is presented as though the merger occurred on December 31, 2004. The statements of operations are presented as though the merger occurred on January 1, 2004. Cimarex and Magnum Hunter both use the full cost method of accounting for their oil and gas producing activities.
2. Method of Accounting for the Merger
Cimarex will account for the merger using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. Under that method of accounting, one of the combining companies—in this case, Cimarex—is deemed to be the acquirer for accounting purposes.
The purchase method of accounting requires that Magnum Hunter's assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Cimarex be recorded at their estimated fair values. In the merger, Cimarex will issue 0.415 shares of Cimarex common stock for each outstanding share of Magnum Hunter common stock. On a pro forma basis, assuming that the merger had occurred on December 31, 2004, this would have resulted in Cimarex issuing approximately 36.3 million shares of its common stock to Magnum Hunter stockholders (excluding 2,243,861 shares to be issued to wholly owned subsidiaries of Magnum Hunter).
The purchase price of Magnum Hunter's net assets will be based on the total value of the Cimarex common stock issued to the Magnum Hunter stockholders. For accounting purposes, the value of the Cimarex common stock issued is based on the weighted average price of Cimarex's common stock for a period beginning two days before and ending two days after the announcement of the merger. This average price equaled $37.66 per share.
3. Pro Forma Adjustments Related to the Merger
The unaudited pro forma balance sheet includes the following adjustments:
(a) This entry reflects the purchase price paid by Cimarex and adjusts the historical book values of Magnum Hunter's assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004 to their estimated fair values, in accordance with purchase accounting. In addition, deferred income taxes are recognized for the difference between the revised carrying amounts of Magnum Hunter's assets and liabilities
I-145
and their associated tax bases, excluding goodwill. The calculation of the total purchase price and the preliminary allocation of this price to assets and liabilities are shown below.
| |
(In Millions) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro forma calculation and allocation of purchase price: | |||||
| Shares of Cimarex common stock to be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders | 36.3 | ||||
| Average Cimarex stock price | $ | 37.66 | |||
| Fair value of common stock to be issued | $ | 1,367.0 | |||
| Plus: Estimated merger costs to be incurred | 20.0 | ||||
| Total purchase price | 1,387.0 | ||||
| Plus: Liabilities to be assumed by Cimarex: | |||||
| Current liabilities | 202.3 | ||||
| Fair value of long-term debt | 696.0 | ||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 46.5 | ||||
| Deferred income taxes | 439.9 | ||||
| Total purchase price plus liabilities assumed | $ | 2,771.7 | |||
| Fair value of Magnum Hunter's Assets: | |||||
| Current assets | $ | 139.5 | |||
| Proved oil and gas properties | 1,594.0 | ||||
| Unproved oil and gas properties | 301.0 | ||||
| Other property and equipment | 81.0 | ||||
| Other non-current assets | 66.1 | ||||
| Goodwill | 590.1 | ||||
| Total fair value of Magnum Hunter's assets | $ | 2,771.7 | |||
The total purchase price includes the value of the Cimarex common stock to be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger. The total purchase price plus liabilities assumed also includes:
- •
- $20.0 million
of estimated merger costs. These costs include investment banking expenses, severance, legal and accounting fees, printing expenses and other
merger-related costs. These costs have been recorded as additions to current liabilities in the unaudited pro forma balance sheet.
- •
- Estimated $46.0 million to be paid by Magnum Hunter to redeem its remaining stock options by paying a cash payment equal to the product of the total number of shares subject to the options (estimated at 5.94 million shares), times the excess, if any, of the closing price of Magnum Hunter common stock on the day before the closing date (assuming that amount is equal to the average Cimarex price of $37.66 used in the calculation of the purchase price of Magnum Hunter times the exchange ratio of 0.415, or $15.63) over the exercise price of the options (assuming a weighted average price of $7.88). Magnum Hunter also estimates that it will incur fees and expenses of approximately $11.5 million. These costs, as well as the cash paid to redeem the stock options, are being expensed as incurred by Magnum Hunter. There are no arrangements to have Cimarex reimburse any of Magnum Hunter's merger-related costs. These estimated costs have been accounted for as an increase to current liabilities in the unaudited pro forma balance sheet.
I-146
The purchase price allocation is preliminary and is subject to change due to several factors, including: (i) changes in the fair values of Magnum Hunter's working capital, oil and gas properties, and other assets and liabilities up to the closing date of the merger; (ii) the actual merger costs incurred; (iii) the number of Magnum Hunter shares and stock options outstanding at the closing date of the merger; and (iv) changes in Cimarex's valuation estimates that may be made between now and the time the purchase price allocation is finalized. These changes will not be known until after the closing date of the merger.
(b) This entry reflects the issuance of Cimarex common stock for Magnum Hunter's 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock, which will be converted to Magnum Hunter common stock before the effective time of the merger, then canceled and exchanged in the merger for shares of Cimarex common stock.
(c) These adjustments eliminate the components of Magnum Hunter's historical stockholders' equity accounts.
The unaudited pro forma statement of operations includes the following adjustments:
(d) This adjustment increases Magnum Hunter's historical depreciation, depletion and amortization expense associated with oil and gas properties based on the pro forma allocation of purchase price to oil and gas properties.
(e) This adjustment reduces interest expense for the effect of amortizing the excess of the estimated fair value of Magnum Hunter's long-term debt over the principal amount of the debt.
(f) This adjustment records the income tax impact of the depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and interest expense pro forma adjustments at an estimated effective income tax rate of 36.6%.
4. Common Shares Outstanding
Pro forma income from continuing operations per share for the year ended December 31, 2004 has been calculated based on the pro forma weighted average number of shares outstanding as follows (in millions):
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic: | |||
| Cimarex weighted average common shares outstanding | 41.5 | ||
| Magnum Hunter basic shares outstanding multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.415 | 36.3 | ||
| Pro forma weighted average Cimarex shares outstanding | 77.8 | ||
| Diluted: | |||
| Cimarex weighted average common shares outstanding | 42.8 | ||
| Magnum Hunter diluted shares outstanding multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.415 | 36.3 | ||
| Pro forma weighted average Cimarex shares outstanding | 79.1 | ||
I-147
The diluted shares outstanding do not include the following potentially issuable shares, since the inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive at December 31, 2004.
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Magnum Hunter Warrants | 7.2 | |
During February and March 2005, approximately 6.8 million warrants were exercised at $15 per share for proceeds of approximately $102.3 million for the 6.8 million common shares issued. The remaining warrants that were not exercised expired on March 21, 2005. Of the proceeds received by Magnum Hunter in connection with the February and March 2005 warrant exercises, approximately $100.0 million was used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Magnum Hunter credit facility and approximately $2.3 million was used for capital expenditures by Magnum Hunter. The pro forma balance sheet at December 31, 2004 does not give effect to the subsequent exercise of the warrants or the repayment of outstanding indebtedness under the Magnum Hunter credit facility.
5. Goodwill
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, and Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result of these two pronouncements, goodwill recorded in connection with business combinations is no longer amortized but rather tested for impairment at least annually. Accordingly, the accompanying unaudited pro forma statement of operations includes no amortization of the goodwill to be recorded in the merger.
6. Historical and Reclassified Statements of Operations
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter present certain revenues, costs and operating expenses differently in their respective consolidated statements of operations. We have reclassified certain reported revenues, costs and operating expenses for both companies in the unaudited pro forma financial information.
I-148
The historical and reclassified amounts of Cimarex for the year ended December 31, 2004 are presented in the following table.
| |
Historical Cimarex |
Reclassifications |
Reclassified Cimarex |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of dollars) |
|||||||||
| Revenues | ||||||||||
| Oil and gas sales | $ | — | $ | 472.4 | $ | 472.4 | ||||
| Gas sales | 366.3 | (366.3 | ) | — | ||||||
| Oil sales | 106.1 | (106.1 | ) | — | ||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | — | 195.8 | 195.8 | |||||||
| Marketing sales | 195.8 | (195.8 | ) | — | ||||||
| Other | 6.7 | — | 6.7 | |||||||
| 674.9 | — | 674.9 | ||||||||
| Costs and Expenses | ||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | — | 125.5 | 125.5 | |||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 124.3 | (124.3 | ) | — | ||||||
| Accretion expense | 1.2 | (1.2 | ) | — | ||||||
| Production | 37.5 | — | 37.5 | |||||||
| Taxes other than income | 37.8 | — | 37.8 | |||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | — | 203.3 | 203.3 | |||||||
| Transportation | 10.0 | (10.0 | ) | — | ||||||
| Marketing purchases | 193.3 | (193.3 | ) | — | ||||||
| General and administrative | 22.5 | 1.9 | 24.4 | |||||||
| Stock compensation | 1.9 | (1.9 | ) | — | ||||||
| Financing costs | — | .1 | .1 | |||||||
| Interest expense | 1.1 | (1.1 | ) | — | ||||||
| Interest income | (1.0 | ) | 1.0 | — | ||||||
| 428.6 | — | 428.6 | ||||||||
| Income before income tax and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | $ | 246.3 | $ | — | $ | 246.3 | ||||
I-149
The historical and reclassified amounts of Magnum Hunter for the year ended December 31, 2004 are presented in the following table.
| |
Historical Magnum Hunter |
Reclassifications |
Reclassified Magnum Hunter |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of dollars) |
|||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||
| Oil and gas sales | $ | 443.4 | $ | — | $ | 443.4 | ||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | 41.9 | — | 41.9 | |||||||||
| Oil field services | 8.4 | — | 8.4 | |||||||||
| Other | — | 2.9 | 2.9 | |||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | 493.7 | 2.9 | 496.6 | |||||||||
| Operating Costs and Expenses | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 127.2 | — | 127.2 | |||||||||
| Production | — | 78.3 | 78.3 | |||||||||
| Oil and gas production lifting costs | 61.0 | (61.0 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Taxes other than income | — | 26.4 | 26.4 | |||||||||
| Production taxes and other costs | 43.7 | (43.7 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | 29.1 | — | 29.1 | |||||||||
| Oil field services | 5.0 | — | 5.0 | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 22.1 | — | 22.1 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of assets | (.3 | ) | .3 | — | ||||||||
| Total Operating Costs and Expenses | 287.8 | .3 | 288.1 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 205.9 | 2.6 | 208.5 | |||||||||
| Other income | 2.6 | (2.6 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Non-cash hedging adjustments | 1.1 | — | 1.1 | |||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt | (12.2 | ) | — | (12.2 | ) | |||||||
Financing costs |
— |
(38.1 |
) |
(38.1 |
) |
|||||||
Interest expense |
(38.1 |
) |
38.1 |
— |
||||||||
| Income before income tax and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | $ | 159.3 | $ | — | $ | 159.3 | ||||||
7. Cimarex Stock Incentive Plan
The merger will constitute a "change of control event" under the Cimarex incentive plan because of the number of shares of Cimarex common stock that will be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger. As a result, all participants in the plan, including executive officers and directors, would be entitled to acceleration of vesting of options and vesting and payment of restricted stock and restricted stock units and, in the case of directors, extension of the time to exercise options following termination of service as a director. Cimarex sought an agreement from all participants in the plan to
I-150
waive acceleration of vesting and payment. As consideration for the waivers sought from its executive officers, Cimarex agreed to amend the unit and option agreements to provide that:
- (1)
- if
the restricted stock units are not redeemable when they vest, Cimarex will pay a participant holding a unit a cash bonus equal to the amount of Social Security taxes payable
grossed up for taxes payable on the bonus;
- (2)
- if
a participant holding a unit terminates employment on account of death or disability, vesting will be accelerated; and
- (3)
- if a participant holding an option terminates employment on account of death or disability, vesting will be accelerated.
In consideration for the waivers sought from all other employee participants, Cimarex agreed to amend the unit and option agreements as described in the preceding sentence and, in addition, agreed to grant, upon the closing of the merger, an additional grant of restricted stock or restricted stock units equal to 25% of the original grant, which will vest and become payable on the third anniversary of the closing of the merger. Cimarex has sought waivers from its directors of acceleration of vesting and payment of restricted stock (or in some cases deferred compensation units), but elected not to seek waivers of acceleration of vesting of options held by directors. The unexercisable options held by directors will fully vest by their terms on October 1, 2005, and only two directors (Messrs. Helmerich and Rooney) will receive an extension of the exercise period as a result of the change of control event. At April 15, 2005, each of the eight non-employee directors held unvested options representing 3,333 shares of common stock, which had a value, if exercised, of approximately $76,000, or an aggregate of 26,664 shares with a value, if exercised, of approximately $0.6 million.
Cimarex has obtained waivers from all of its current executive officers and directors. A former executive officer, Steven R. Shaw, declined to execute a waiver. Although no longer an executive officer, Mr. Shaw remains an employee of Cimarex. Upon the closing of the merger, Mr. Shaw's (i) unvested options representing 81,175 shares of common stock, which had a value, if exercised, at April 15, 2005, of $2.0 million, will vest; and (ii) 45,500 restricted stock units which had a value at April 15, 2005 of $1.6 million, will vest and become payable.
With respect to the acceleration of vesting of options, holders who are not requested to or do not execute a waiver will have the right to exercise their options at and after closing until the option terminates in accordance with its terms. All restricted stock and restricted stock units held by those individuals will become payable at closing.
Cimarex is adopting the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, as of January 1, 2005. For those holders who do not execute waivers, related unearned compensation reflected in Cimarex's stockholders' equity would become fully amortized at closing. At December 31, 2004, total unearned compensation was approximately $10.1 million. For those holders who execute waivers, the waiver agreements will be accounted for as a modification of the original awards, and Cimarex will record additional deferred compensation equal to the difference between the fair value of the original award and the fair value of the modified award. The incremental deferred compensation will be amortized over the remaining term of the awards. Cash bonuses resulting from Social Security taxes payable when the awards vest will be accrued as of the end of each reporting period after the closing of the merger, using the related period-end stock price. The additional 25% grant of units will be recorded at fair market value on the date of grant, as unearned compensation to be amortized over the vesting period of the award.
I-151
8. Supplemental Pro Forma Information Related to Oil and Gas Producing Activities
The following pro forma supplemental information relating to oil and gas operations is presented pursuant to the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69, Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities.
Pro Forma Costs Incurred
The following table reflects total expenditures, both capitalized and expensed, for crude oil and natural gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities for Cimarex, Magnum Hunter and the combined company on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2004.
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of dollars) |
|||||||||||
| Property acquisition costs | $ | 17.5 | $ | 317.5 | $ | 335.0 | (1) | |||||
| Exploration | 57.6 | 52.7 | 110.3 | |||||||||
| Development | 222.0 | 166.5 | 388.5 | |||||||||
| Total finding, development, and acquisition costs | 297.1 | 536.7 | 833.8 | |||||||||
| Asset retirement costs | 2.1 | 7.3 | 9.4 | |||||||||
| Total costs incurred | $ | 299.2 | $ | 544.0 | $ | 843.2 | ||||||
- (1)
- Amounts include $298.3 million applicable to purchases of reserves in place.
Pro Forma Oil and Natural Gas Reserves
The following tables summarize changes in the estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and natural gas proved reserves for Cimarex, Magnum Hunter and the combined company on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Oil (Millions of barrels)
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proved reserves as of December 31, 2003 | 14.14 | 57.40 | 71.54 | |||||
| Revisions of previous estimates | 1.15 | 1.55 | 2.70 | |||||
| Extensions, discoveries and other additions | 1.44 | 3.09 | 4.53 | |||||
| Purchases of reserves in place | — | 8.32 | 8.32 | |||||
| Production | (2.64 | ) | (4.08 | ) | (6.72 | ) | ||
| Sales of reserves in place | (.03 | ) | (.20 | ) | (.23 | ) | ||
| Proved reserves as of December 31, 2004 | 14.06 | 66.08 | 80.14 | |||||
| Proved developed reserves as of: | ||||||||
| December 31, 2003 | 13.88 | 42.99 | 56.87 | |||||
| December 31, 2004 | 13.37 | 48.01 | 61.38 | |||||
I-152
Natural Gas (Billions of cubic feet)
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proved reserves as of December 31, 2003 | 337.34 | 494.05 | 831.39 | |||||
| Revisions of previous estimates | 20.07 | (31.28 | ) | (11.21 | ) | |||
| Extensions, discoveries and other additions | 70.75 | 70.55 | 141.30 | |||||
| Purchases of reserves in place | .13 | 135.02 | 135.15 | |||||
| Production | (63.61 | ) | (55.96 | ) | (119.57 | ) | ||
| Sales of reserves in place | (.04 | ) | (2.26 | ) | (2.30 | ) | ||
| Proved reserves as of December 31, 2004 | 364.64 | 610.12 | 974.76 | |||||
| Proved developed reserves as of: | ||||||||
| December 31, 2003 | 336.23 | 368.53 | 704.76 | |||||
| December 31, 2004 | 364.57 | 442.63 | 807.20 | |||||
Pro Forma Standardized Measure of and Changes in Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The following tables set forth the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows associated with proved oil and natural gas reserves for Cimarex, Magnum Hunter and the combined company on a pro forma basis as of December 31, 2004, as well as the changes therein for the year then ended.
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter |
Pro Forma Combined |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of Dollars) |
||||||||||
| Future cash inflows | $ | 2,570 | $ | 6,134 | $ | 8,704 | |||||
| Future costs: | |||||||||||
| Production | (659 | ) | (1,805 | ) | (2,464 | ) | |||||
| Development | (9 | ) | (402 | ) | (411 | ) | |||||
| Income taxes | (641 | ) | (1,051 | ) | (1,692 | ) | |||||
| Future net cash flows | 1,261 | 2,876 | 4,137 | ||||||||
| 10% annual discount | (463 | ) | (1,312 | ) | (1,775 | ) | |||||
| Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows at December 31, 2004 | $ | 798 | $ | 1,564 | $ | 2,362 | |||||
I-153
Combined estimated future net cash flows before income tax expense, discounted at 10%, totaled approximately $3.2 billion.
| |
Cimarex |
Magnum Hunter |
Pro Forma Combined |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Millions of dollars) |
||||||||||
| Net change in sales prices and production costs | $ | 45.6 | $ | 354.0 | $ | 399.6 | |||||
| Sales revenues less production costs | (387.2 | ) | (338.8 | ) | (726.0 | ) | |||||
| Purchases of reserves in place | .2 | 356.9 | 357.1 | ||||||||
| Extensions, discoveries and other additions | 313.4 | 82.7 | 396.1 | ||||||||
| Revisions in quantity estimates | 71.4 | (60.4 | ) | 11.0 | |||||||
| Sales of reserves in place | (.3 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (6.5 | ) | |||||
| Changes in future development costs | 16.4 | 166.5 | 182.9 | ||||||||
| Accretion of discount | 103.0 | 106.8 | 209.8 | ||||||||
| Change in income taxes | (55.4 | ) | (165.6 | ) | (221.0 | ) | |||||
| Timing and other | (20.6 | ) | — | (20.6 | ) | ||||||
| Net change | 86.5 | 495.9 | 582.4 | ||||||||
| Total at December 31, 2003 | 711.5 | 1,067.7 | 1,779.2 | ||||||||
| Total at December 31, 2004 | $ | 798.0 | $ | 1,563.6 | $ | 2,361.6 | |||||
I-154
DESCRIPTION OF CIMAREX'S CAPITAL STOCK
The following descriptions of Cimarex's capital stock and provisions of its amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws are summaries and are qualified by reference to the complete text of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
Cimarex's authorized capital stock consists of 100 million shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. At the Cimarex annual meeting, Cimarex stockholders will vote on a proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter that would increase the authorized number of common shares to 200 million.
Immediately following the merger, Cimarex expects to have approximately 82.3 million shares of common stock outstanding, 51.4% of which will be held by current Cimarex stockholders and 48.6% of which will be held by current Magnum Hunter stockholders. Approximately 2.4 million shares of common stock (or approximately 8.1 million shares if the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan is approved) will be reserved for issuance under Cimarex's employee benefit plans, including Magnum Hunter options being assumed by Cimarex in the merger. In addition, Cimarex will reserve shares of its common stock for issuance upon conversion of Magnum Hunter's convertible senior notes. The number of shares of Cimarex common stock into which the convertible notes are convertible will depend upon the conversion value in excess of the principal amount of the convertible notes and Cimarex's future common stock price. Based upon an assumed Cimarex stock price of $37.66 per share (the average stock price of Cimarex used in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus), the convertible senior notes would be convertible into 933,750 shares of Cimarex common stock following the merger.
Dividends may be paid on the Cimarex common stock out of assets or funds legally available for dividends, when and if declared by Cimarex's board of directors, subject to any preferential rights of preferred stock, if preferred stock of Cimarex is then outstanding. If Cimarex is liquidated, dissolved or wound up, the holders of shares of Cimarex common stock will be entitled to receive the assets and funds of Cimarex available for distribution after payments to creditors and to the holders of any preferred stock, in proportion to the number of shares held by them.
Each share of Cimarex common stock entitles the holder of record to one vote at all meetings of stockholders and the votes are non-cumulative. The Cimarex common stock has no subscription rights and does not entitle the holder to any preemptive rights. The outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock are, and the shares to be issued in the merger will be, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
Cimarex's board has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to create series of preferred stock, to issue shares of preferred stock in such series up to the maximum number of shares of the relevant class of preferred stock authorized, and to determine the preferences, rights, privileges and restrictions of any such series, including the dividend rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, the number of shares constituting any such series and the designation of such series. Cimarex has not issued any of this preferred stock and has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock after the effective time of the merger.
I-155
Cimarex's amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in connection with Cimarex's stockholder rights plan. See "—Stockholder Rights Plan" below.
Cimarex has adopted a stockholder rights plan. Under the terms of the plan, Cimarex declared as a dividend for each share of common stock outstanding the right to purchase certain preferred stock. Each right will entitle the registered holder to purchase from Cimarex a unit consisting of one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock. The following summary description of the rights does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the rights agreement between Cimarex and UMB Bank, N.A. For information on how to obtain a copy of the Cimarex stockholder rights plan, see "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9.
The rights are attached to all common stock certificates representing shares then outstanding and no separate rights certificates have been distributed. Subject to certain exceptions specified in the rights agreement, the rights will separate from the common stock and a rights distribution date will occur upon the earlier of:
- •
- ten
business days following a public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons, or an acquiring person, has acquired, obtained the right to
acquire, or otherwise obtained beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, other than as a result of repurchases of stock by Cimarex or certain inadvertent actions
by institutional or certain other stockholders; or
- •
- ten business days (or such later date as Cimarex's board of directors will determine) following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in a person or group becoming an acquiring person.
The rights are not exercisable until the rights distribution date and will expire at 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on February 22, 2012, unless such date is extended or the rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by Cimarex as described below.
If a person becomes an acquiring person, except by an offer for all outstanding shares of common stock which the independent directors determine to be fair and not inadequate and to otherwise be in the best interests of Cimarex and its stockholders, after receiving advice from one or more investment banking firms, each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive, upon exercise, common stock (or, in certain circumstances, cash, property or other securities of Cimarex) having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. However, following the occurrence of the event described in this paragraph, all rights that are, or were, beneficially owned by any acquiring person will be null and void. However, rights are not exercisable following the occurrence of the event set forth above until such time as the rights are no longer redeemable by Cimarex as set forth below.
For example, at an exercise price of $60 per right, each right not owned by an acquiring person following an event set forth in the preceding paragraph would entitle its holder to purchase $120 worth of common stock (or other consideration, as noted above) for $60. Assuming that the common stock had a per share value of $60 at that time, the holder of each valid right would be entitled to purchase two shares of common stock for $60.
If, at any time following the stock acquisition date (as described above),
- •
- Cimarex engages in a merger or other business combination transaction in which Cimarex is not the surviving corporation (other than by an offer for all outstanding shares of common stock which the independent directors determine to be fair and not inadequate and to otherwise be in
I-156
- •
- Cimarex
engages in a merger or other business combination transaction in which Cimarex is the surviving corporation and the common stock of Cimarex is changed or exchanged;
or
- •
- 50% or more of Cimarex's assets, cash flow or earning power is sold or transferred,
the best interests of Cimarex and its stockholders, after receiving advice from one or more investment banking firms);
each holder of a right (except rights which have previously been voided as set forth above) will thereafter have the right to receive, upon exercise, common stock of the acquiring company having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right.
At any time after a person becomes an acquiring person and before the acquisition by a person or group of fifty percent or more of the outstanding common stock, the Cimarex board of directors may exchange the rights (other than the rights owned by a person or group which have become void), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock, or one one-hundredth of a share of preferred stock (or of a share of a class or series of Cimarex preferred stock having equivalent rights, preferences and privileges), per right (subject to adjustment in certain events).
At any time before the earlier of:
- •
- ten
business days following the stock acquisition date; or
- •
- February 22, 2012,
Cimarex may redeem the rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.01 per right (subject to adjustment in certain events and payable in cash, common stock or other consideration deemed appropriate by Cimarex's board of directors). Immediately upon the action of Cimarex's board of directors ordering redemption of the rights, the rights will terminate and the only right of the holders of rights will be to receive the $0.01 redemption price.
Until a right is exercised, its holder, as such, will have no rights as a stockholder of Cimarex, including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive dividends. While the distribution of the rights will not be taxable to stockholders or to Cimarex, stockholders may, depending upon the circumstances, recognize taxable income if the rights become exercisable for shares of Cimarex common stock (or other consideration) or for common stock of the acquiring company or in the event of the redemption of the rights as described above.
Any of the provisions of the rights agreement may be amended by Cimarex's board of directors before the rights distribution date. After the rights distribution date, the provisions of the rights agreement may be amended by the board in order to cure any ambiguity, to make changes which do not adversely affect the interests of holders of rights, or to shorten or lengthen any time period under the rights agreement.
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company is the transfer agent and registrar for Cimarex's common stock.
Cimarex's common stock is listed on the NYSE. Cimarex has agreed to cause the shares of common stock issuable in the merger to be approved for listing on the NYSE before the effective time of the merger, subject to official notice of issuance.
I-157
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
As a result of the merger, Magnum Hunter common stockholders will become holders of Cimarex common stock. Cimarex is a Delaware corporation and Magnum Hunter is a Nevada corporation. The rights of Cimarex stockholders are currently governed by the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Cimarex, or the Cimarex charter, the bylaws of Cimarex, or the Cimarex bylaws, and the laws of the State of Delaware. The rights of Magnum Hunter stockholders are currently governed by the amended articles of incorporation of Magnum Hunter, or the Magnum Hunter articles, the amended and restated bylaws of Magnum Hunter, or the Magnum Hunter bylaws, and the laws of the State of Nevada. At the effective time of the merger, holders of Magnum Hunter common stock will become holders of Cimarex common stock and, as such, the rights of those holders will be governed by Delaware law, the Cimarex charter and Cimarex bylaws.
The following is a summary comparison of the material similarities and differences between the rights of holders of Cimarex common stock and holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and, more particularly, certain material differences between provisions of the Cimarex charter and the Magnum Hunter articles, the Cimarex bylaws and the Magnum Hunter bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, and the Nevada Revised Statutes, or NRS. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Cimarex charter and bylaws and the Magnum Hunter articles and bylaws. For information on how to obtain copies of the Cimarex charter or Cimarex bylaws, see "Chapter III—The Stockholder Meetings, Voting and Other Information—Where You Can Find More Information" on page III-9. Furthermore, the description of the differences between the DGCL and the NRS is a summary only, is not a complete description of the differences between the DGCL and the NRS, and is qualified in its entirety by references to the DGCL and the NRS.
| |
Cimarex Stockholder Rights |
Magnum Hunter Stockholder Rights |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authorized Capital Stock | Cimarex is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Cimarex is proposing that its stockholders approve an
amendment to the Cimarex charter to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 200,000,000. The merger is not conditioned on approval of this amendment, but the amendment will not be effected unless the merger takes place. As of the record date for the Cimarex annual meeting, there were approximately 41,786,219 shares of common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. |
Magnum Hunter is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.002 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of the record date for the Magnum Hunter special meeting, there were approximately 95,187,747 shares of common stock outstanding, 80,000 shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding and 1,000,000 shares of 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock held by a wholly owned subsidiary of Magnum Hunter. |
||
Calling of Stockholder Meetings and Notice |
Annual meetings are held on such date and time as set by the board of directors. The DGCL provides that the board of directors or such person or persons authorized by the corporation's charter or bylaws may call a special meeting of stockholders. The Cimarex bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called by the chairman of the board of directors, the president, or the board of directors. Notice of a special meeting must be given at least ten days, but no more than 60 days, before such meeting. |
The NRS does not distinguish between regular and special meetings of stockholders, but instead provides that notice of all meetings of stockholders must be in writing and signed by the president or a vice president, or the secretary, or an assistant secretary, or by such other person as the corporation's bylaws may prescribe or permit or the directors may designate. Annual meetings are held on the date and time designated by the board of directors. Special meetings may be called by the president or the board of directors and |
||
I-158
must be called upon the request of holders of at least 10% of Magnum Hunter's outstanding voting shares. Notice of stockholder meetings must be given no less than 10 and no more than 60 days before the meeting. |
||||
Quorum for Stockholder Meetings |
A majority of the shares of Cimarex common stock issued and outstanding and present in person or by proxy at a special meeting will constitute a quorum for purposes of the special meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. |
One-third of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issued and outstanding and present in person or by proxy at a special meeting will constitute a quorum for purposes of a stockholder meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. |
||
Stockholder Action by Written Consent |
Unless prohibited in the certificate of incorporation, the DGCL permits any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of stockholders to be taken without a meeting if a written consent is signed by the holders of not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize such action at a meeting at which all such shares entitled to vote were present and voted. The Cimarex charter prohibits stockholders of Cimarex from taking action by written consent instead of a meeting. |
Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws, the NRS permits any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of stockholders to be taken without a meeting if a written consent is signed by stockholders holding at least the proportion of voting power is required to approve the action at a meeting. The Magnum Hunter bylaws permit stockholders of Magnum Hunter to act by written consent. |
||
Advance Notice of Director Nominations and Other Proposals: Annual Meetings |
A stockholder's notice must be delivered to and received by the secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 100 days before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. However, if the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever first occurs. |
The Magnum Hunter bylaws do not contain any provisions on stockholder nominations or proposals. |
||
Advance Notice of Director Nominations and Other Proposals: Special Meetings |
The Cimarex bylaws provide that the only business that can be conducted at special meetings will be the items of business set forth in the notice of special meeting. |
The Magnum Hunter bylaws do not contain any provisions on stockholder nominations or proposals. |
||
Number of Directors |
The DGCL permits the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of a corporation to govern the number and term of directors. The Cimarex charter and bylaws provide that the number of directors on the board will be at least six and not more than nine, with the exact number to be fixed by |
The NRS requires that a corporation have at least one director and permits the articles of incorporation or bylaws of a corporation to govern the number and term of directors. The Magnum Hunter bylaws require a minimum of one director on the board of Magnum Hunter. There are currently nine |
I-159
a resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors. There are currently nine directors on the board of Cimarex. Following the effective time of the merger, it is expected that one of the current board members of Magnum Hunter will join the Cimarex board of directors. Cimarex is proposing that its stockholders approve an amendment to the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum board size to ten. Cimarex's board of directors also plans to amend the Cimarex bylaws to increase the maximum board size to ten directors. The merger is not conditioned on approval of this amendment, but the amendment will not be effected unless the merger takes place. |
directors on the Magnum Hunter board. |
|||
Classification of Board of Directors |
Directors are divided into three classes currently consisting of three directors each. Each class serves a three-year term and is as nearly equal in size as possible. One class is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders. |
Directors are divided into three classes currently consisting of three directors each. Each class serves a three-year term and is as nearly equal in size as possible. One class is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders. |
||
Removal of Directors |
The DGCL provides that if a corporation, such as Cimarex, has a classified board, and unless the charter otherwise provides, stockholders may remove a director only for cause. The Cimarex bylaws provide that, subject to any rights of the holders of shares of preferred stock then outstanding, any director or the entire board of directors may be removed from office at a regular or special meeting of the stockholders of Cimarex, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of votes cast on the issue of removal of directors. |
The NRS provides that any director may be removed by the vote of stockholders representing not less than two-thirds of the voting power of issued and outstanding stock, unless the articles of incorporation require the concurrence of more than two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding stock. The Magnum Hunter bylaws provide that directors may be removed by the stockholders with or without cause. Directors may only be removed by action of the board for cause. |
||
Amendment of Certificate or Articles of Incorporation |
Under the DGCL, a proposed amendment to the certificate of incorporation requires a resolution adopted by the board of directors and, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote, and a majority of the outstanding stock of each class entitled to vote as a class. The Cimarex charter may be amended, altered, changed or repealed in the manner provided for by the statute in effect at the time of such amendment, alteration, change or repeal. Provisions of the certificate of incorporation relating to |
Under the NRS, a proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation requires a resolution adopted by the board of directors and the affirmative vote of the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the articles of incorporation. The NRS provides that if any amendment would alter or change the rights of any holders of shares of a class of stock without voting rights, the vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares of the class, voting as a separate |
I-160
the classified board of directors, the elimination of stockholder action by written consent and amendment of the bylaws may only be adopted, amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of at least eighty percent (80%) of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. The DGCL provides that if any amendment would alter or change the rights of any holders of shares of a class of stock without voting rights, the vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares of the class, voting as a separate class, is required to authorize such amendment, even if the class otherwise would not have voting rights. |
class, is required to authorize such amendment, even if the class otherwise would not have voting rights. |
|||
Amendment of Bylaws |
Under the DGCL, the power to adopt, alter and repeal the bylaws is vested in the stockholders, unless the corporation's certificate of incorporation vests such power in the board of directors. The fact that such power has been conferred upon the directors shall not divest the stockholders of the power, nor limit their power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws. The Cimarex bylaws may be adopted, amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the entire board of directors. The bylaws also may be adopted, amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of at least eighty percent (80%) of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. |
The NRS provides that, subject to the bylaws, if any, adopted by the stockholders, the directors may make the bylaws of the corporation. The Magnum Hunter bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed by action of the board of directors. |
||
Vote Required for Mergers |
Unless a corporation's certificate of incorporation or its board of directors requires a greater vote, the DGCL generally requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares in each class entitled to vote to approve a merger. The Cimarex charter and bylaws do not contain any specific provisions relating to stockholder approval of mergers. |
Unless the articles of incorporation or the board of directors require a greater vote, the NRS generally requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares in each class entitled to vote to approve a merger. The Magnum Hunter articles and bylaws do not contain any specific provisions relating to stockholder approval of mergers. |
||
Inspection of Books and Records |
Under the DGCL, any stockholder of a Delaware corporation may examine the list of stockholders and any stockholder making a written demand may inspect any other corporate books and records for any purpose reasonably related to the stockholder's interest as a stockholder. |
Under the NRS, any person who has been a stockholder of record of a Nevada corporation for at least six months immediately preceding a demand, or any person holding or authorized in writing by the holders of, at least five percent of all of its outstanding shares, upon at least five days' written demand is entitled to inspect and copy the following records: — a copy certified by the secretary of state of the corporation's articles of |
I-161
incorporation and all amendments; — a copy certified by an officer of the corporation of the corporation's bylaws and all amendments; and — a stock ledger, revised annually, containing the names of all persons who are stockholders of the corporation, places of residence, and number of shares held by them respectively. The inspection rights authorized by this provision of the NRS may be denied to a stockholder upon the stockholder's refusal to furnish to the corporation an affidavit that the inspection is not desired for any other purpose other than the business of the corporation. In addition, any stockholder of a Nevada corporation owning not less than 15 percent of all issued and outstanding shares, or who has been authorized in writing by the holders of at least 15 percent of all its issued and outstanding shares, upon at least five days written demand, is entitled to inspect the books of account and all financial records of the corporation, to make extracts therefrom, and to conduct an audit of such records. This right may not be limited in the articles or bylaws of any corporation but may be denied to any stockholder upon the stockholder's refusal to furnish the corporation an affidavit that such inspection, extracts or audit is not desired for any purpose not related to the stockholder's interest in the corporation as a stockholder. However, the right to inspect and audit financial records does not apply to any corporation listed and traded on any recognized stock exchange or to any corporation that furnishes to its stockholders a detailed, annual financial statement. |
||||
State Anti-Takeover Statutes |
Under the Delaware business combination statute, a corporation is prohibited from engaging in any business combination with an interested stockholder who, together with its affiliates or associates, owns, or who is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and within a three-year period did own, 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock for a three year period following the time the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless: — before the time the stockholder became an interested stockholder, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination |
The NRS generally prohibits a Nevada corporation with 200 or more stockholders of record from engaging in a combination, referred to as a variety of transactions, including mergers, asset sales, issuance of stock and other actions resulting in a financial benefit to an interested stockholder, with an interested stockholder referred to generally as a person that is the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares, for a period of three years following the date that such person became an interested stockholder unless the board of directors of the corporation first approved either the |
I-162
or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; — the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation, excluding specified shares, upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; or — at or after the time the stockholder became an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of the corporation and authorized by the affirmative vote, at an annual or special meeting and not by written consent, of at least 662/3% of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, excluding shares held by that interested stockholder. A business combination generally includes: — mergers, consolidations and sales or other dispositions of 10% or more of the assets of a corporation to or with an interested stockholder; — specified transactions resulting in the issuance or transfer to an interested stockholder of any capital stock of the corporation or its subsidiaries; and — other transactions resulting in a disproportionate financial benefit to an interested stockholder. The provisions of the Delaware business combination statute do not apply to a corporation if, subject to certain requirements, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation contain a provision expressly electing not to be governed by the provisions of the statute or the corporation does not have voting stock listed on a national securities exchange, authorized for quotation on an inter-dealer quotation system of a registered national securities association or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. Because Cimarex has not adopted any provision in its charter to "opt out" of the Delaware business combination statute, the statute is applicable to business combinations involving Cimarex. |
combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder's becoming an interested stockholder. If this approval is not obtained, the combination may be consummated after the three year period expires if either: — (1) the board of directors of the corporation approved the combination or the purchase of the shares by the interested stockholder before the date that the person became an interested stockholder, (2) the transaction by which the person became an interested stockholder was approved by the board of directors of the corporation before the person became an interested stockholder, or (3) the combination is approved by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder at a meeting called no earlier than three years after the date the interested stockholder became such; or — the aggregate amount of cash and the market value of consideration other than cash to be received by holders of common stock and holders of any other class or series of shares meets the minimum requirements set forth in NRS Sections 78.441 through 78.443, and before the consummation of the combination, except in limited circumstances, the interested stockholder would not have become the beneficial owner of additional voting shares of the corporation. A Nevada corporation may expressly elect not to be governed by these sections of the NRS, if such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested shares entitled to vote; provided, however, such vote by disinterested stockholders is not required to the extent the Nevada corporation is not subject to such provisions. Such an amendment to the articles of incorporation does not become effective until 18 months after the vote of the disinterested stockholders and does not apply to any combination with an interested stockholder whose date of acquiring shares is on or before the effective date of the amendment. Magnum Hunter has adopted a provision in its bylaws in which it elects not to be governed by the sections of the NRS relating to business combinations. The |
I-163
statute thus does not apply to combinations involving Magnum Hunter. |
||||
Control Share Acquisitions |
Delaware does not have a control share acquisition statute. |
The NRS limits the acquisition of a controlling interest in a Nevada corporation with 200 or more stockholders of record, at least 100 of whom have Nevada addresses. According to the NRS, an acquiring person who acquires a controlling interest in an issuing corporation may not exercise voting rights on any control shares unless such voting rights are conferred by a majority vote of the disinterested stockholders of the issuing corporation at a special or annual meeting of the stockholders. If the control shares are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person acquires control shares with a majority or more of all the voting power, any stockholder, other than the acquiring person, who does not vote in favor of authorizing voting rights for the control shares is entitled to demand payment for the fair value of such person's shares. Under the NRS, a controlling interest means the ownership of outstanding voting shares of an issuing corporation sufficient to enable the acquiring person, individually or in association with others, directly or indirectly, to exercise: — one-fifth or more but less than one-third, — one-third or more but less than a majority, or — a majority or more of the voting power of the issuing corporation in the election of directors. Outstanding voting shares of an issuing corporation that an acquiring person acquires or offers to acquire in an acquisition and acquires within 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person became an acquiring person are referred to as control shares. The control share provisions of the NRS do not apply if the corporation opts out of such provisions in the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation in effect on the tenth day following the acquisition of a controlling interest by an acquiring person. Magnum Hunter has not opted out of the control share acquisition statute. |
I-164
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal |
Under the DGCL, except as otherwise provided by the DGCL, stockholders have the right to demand and receive payment in cash of the fair value of their stock (as appraised in judicial proceedings) in the event of a merger or consolidation instead of the consideration such stockholder would otherwise receive in such transaction. However, stockholders do not have such appraisal rights if they hold shares or depository receipts that are listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders and if, among other things, the consideration they receive for their shares consists of: — shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation or depository receipts in respect of such shares; — shares of stock or depository receipts in respect of such shares of any other corporation which at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders; — cash instead of fractional shares of the corporations described in either of the above two clauses; or — any combination of shares of stock and cash instead of fractional shares described in the three clauses above. Under the DGCL, any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of, among other things, any merger or consolidation. The Cimarex charter does not provide for such specific appraisal rights. |
Under the NRS, except as otherwise provided by the NRS, stockholders have the right to demand and receive payment in cash of the fair value of their stock in the event of a merger or exchange instead of the consideration such stockholder would otherwise receive in such transaction. However, stockholders do not have such appraisal rights if they hold shares that are listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise; or the holders of the class or series are required under the plan of merger or exchange to accept for the shares anything except cash, owner's interests or owner's interests and cash instead of fractional owner's interests of: — the surviving or acquiring entity; — any other entity which, at the effective date of the plan of merger or exchange, were either listed on a national securities exchange, included in the national market system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held of record by at least 2,000 holders of owner's interests of record; or — a combination of cash and owner's interests of the kind described in the above two clauses. In addition, no right of dissent exists for any holders of the surviving domestic corporation if the plan of merger does not require action of the stockholders of the surviving domestic corporation under the NRS. Holders of Magnum Hunter common stock will not have dissenters' rights of appraisal under the NRS as a result of the merger because Magnum Hunter's shares are traded on a national securities exchange and Magnum Hunter's stockholders will be receiving shares of Cimarex common stock which will be listed on a national securities exchange and cash instead of any fractional shares. Holders of Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock will have dissenters' rights of appraisal as a result of the merger |
I-165
because the Series A preferred stock is not publicly traded. |
||||
Liability of Directors |
The DGCL provides that a corporation's charter may include a provision eliminating director liability except for cases of a breach of the director's duty of loyalty, instances where the director has received an improper personal benefit, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, and improper payment of dividends. The Cimarex charter provides for elimination of director liability to the full extent allowed by Delaware law. |
The NRS provides for more expansive elimination of liability than the DGCL. Unless the corporation's articles of incorporation provide for a higher standard, which was adopted after October 1, 2003, neither a director nor an officer of a Nevada corporation can be held personally liable to the corporation, its stockholders or its creditors unless the director or officer committed both a breach of fiduciary duty and such breach was accompanied by intentional misconduct, fraud, or knowing violation of law. Unlike Delaware, Nevada does not exclude breaches of the duty of loyalty or instances where the director has received an improper personal benefit. Magnum Hunter's articles provide for elimination of director liability to the full extent allowed by Nevada law. |
||
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
The Cimarex charter and bylaws provide for indemnification of Cimarex's directors and officers to the full extent allowed by Delaware law. Under the DGCL, a corporation may, through, among other means, a majority vote of a quorum of disinterested directors, indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. However, with respect to actions by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to |
The Magnum Hunter bylaws provide that Magnum Hunter will indemnify any officer or director of Magnum Hunter to the maximum extent permitted by the NRS. Magnum Hunter will pay these expenses in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by a director or officer to repay the advanced amount if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by Magnum Hunter under the NRS or Magnum Hunter's bylaws. Under the NRS, a corporation may, through, among other means, a majority vote of a quorum of disinterested directors, indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in |
I-166
which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which such court shall deem proper. A director or officer who is successful, on the merits or otherwise, in defense of any proceeding subject to the DGCL's indemnification provisions must be indemnified by the corporation for reasonable expenses incurred in connection therewith, including attorneys' fees. |
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or if the indemnified party is not liable under the NRS's elimination of liability provisions, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. However, with respect to actions by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which such court shall deem proper. A director or officer who is successful, on the merits or otherwise, in defense of any proceeding subject to the NRS's indemnification provisions must be indemnified by the corporation for reasonable expenses incurred in connection therewith, including attorneys' fees. |
I-167
CHAPTER II—THE CIMAREX ANNUAL MEETING PROPOSALS
Cimarex's Board of Directors consists of nine members and is divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III directors. At each annual meeting, a class of directors is elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting in the third year following the year of election. Each director holds office until his successor is elected and qualifies.
The terms of the three current Class III directors, Glenn A. Cox, David A. Hentschel and L. Paul Teague, will expire at the 2005 annual meeting. Messrs. Cox, Hentschel and Teague have each been nominated to stand for reelection at the meeting to hold office until Cimarex's 2008 annual meeting.
Unless instructed otherwise, the proxies will be voted "FOR" the election of each of the Class III nominees named above to serve for three years or until his successor is elected and qualifies. If, prior to the annual meeting, one or more of the nominees becomes unavailable to serve as a director, any shares represented by a proxy directing a vote will be voted for the remaining nominees and for any substitute nominee or nominees designated by Cimarex's Board of Directors or its Governance Committee. As of the mailing of these proxy materials, the Board of Directors knows of no reason why any director nominee would not be available to serve as a director.
Cimarex encourages its directors to attend annual meetings. All but one of its directors attended last year's annual meeting held on May 19, 2004.
Information concerning the nominees selected by the Cimarex Board of Directors, as well as each of the continuing directors, is set forth below:
Nominees for Election for Three-Year Terms Expiring in 2008
| Glenn A. Cox, age 75 | Director Since 2002 |
President and Chief Operating Officer of Phillips Petroleum Company from June 1985 until his retirement in 1991. Chief Financial Officer of Phillips Petroleum Company from June 1980 to May 1985. Director and chairman of audit committee of Helmerich & Payne, and previous director and member of audit committees of The Williams Companies and Union Texas Petroleum.
| David A. Hentschel, age 71 | Director Since 2002 |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation from 1997 until 1999, when he retired. President and Chief Executive Officer of Canadian Occidental Petroleum, Ltd, now known as Nexen, from 1995 until 1997. Director of Nexen Inc.
| L. Paul Teague, age 70 | Director Since 2002 |
With Texaco Exploration & Producing Inc. for 35 years until retirement in 1994. Held the positions of Vice President, Western Region; Division Manager of the New Orleans Division, Eastern Producing Department; Vice President, New Orleans Producing Division of Texaco USA; and Vice President, Producing Department, Texaco USA in Houston.
The Cimarex Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the election of Messrs. Cox, Hentschel and Teague as Class III directors. A plurality of the votes represented at the annual meeting by shares of Cimarex common stock entitled to vote is required to elect the Class III directors.
II-1
Class I Directors Continuing in Office—Terms Expiring in 2006
| F. H. Merelli, age 69 | Director Since 2002 |
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Cimarex since September 30, 2002. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Key Production Company, Inc. from September 1992 to September 30, 2002 and President from March 2002 until September 30, 2002 and from September 1992 to September 1999. Director and member of audit committee of Apache Corporation.
| Paul D. Holleman, age 73 | Director Since 2002 |
Senior partner of Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, a Denver law firm, until 2000, when he retired. Other positions in his 40 years with Holme Roberts included Chairman of the Natural Resources Department and member of the executive committee.
| Michael J. Sullivan, age 65 | Director Since 2002 |
Member of the Denver law firm, Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons LLP, since 2001, most recently as partner of the Casper office. United States Ambassador to Ireland from 1998 until 2001. Practiced law with Brown, Drew, Apostolos, Massey & Sullivan from 1964 to 1986 and from 1995 until 1998. Governor of Wyoming from 1987 through 1995. Director of Kerry Group plc, director and member of audit committee and governance committee of Allied Irish Bank Group and director and member of compensation, governance and executive committees of First Interstate BancSystem.
In the merger agreement, Cimarex has agreed to cause one member of Magnum Hunter's board of directors to be appointed to the board of directors of Cimarex following the merger. The Cimarex board of directors will select the Magnum Hunter director before the effective time of the merger and currently expects to designate the director to Class I. In order to allow the Magnum Hunter director to serve on the board while retaining the expertise of its existing board members, Cimarex is proposing to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum size of the board from nine directors to ten. See "Chapter I—The Merger—Other Merger-Related Proposals to Be Presented at the Cimarex Annual Meeting—Proposal to Amend the Cimarex Charter to Increase the Maximum Number of Directors" on page I-136.
Class II Directors Continuing in Office—Terms Expiring in 2007
| Cortlandt S. Dietler, age 83 | Director Since 2002 |
Chairman of the Board of TransMontaigne, Inc. since April 1995. Chief Executive Officer of TransMontaigne from April 1995 through September 1999. Director of Hallador Petroleum Company and Forest Oil Corporation. Chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee and the compensation committee of Forest Oil.
| Hans Helmerich, age 46 | Director Since 2002 |
Director of Helmerich & Payne since 1987. President and Chief Executive Officer of Helmerich & Payne since 1989. Director of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
| L. F. Rooney, III, age 51 | Director Since 2002 |
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Rooney Brothers Co. since 1984. Chairman of the Board of Manhattan Construction Company since 1994 and Chief Executive Officer from 1982 to 1994. Director of Helmerich & Payne, BOK Financial Corp. and Bank of Oklahoma N.A. Chairman of the nominating and governance committee and member of the audit committee of Helmerich & Payne, and member of the credit committee of Bank of Oklahoma.
II-2
The Cimarex Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Cox, Dietler, Hentschel, Holleman, Rooney, Sullivan and Teague are independent within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Cimarex. Messrs. Merelli and Helmerich are not independent because Mr. Merelli is an executive officer of Cimarex, and Mr. Helmerich was an executive officer of Cimarex. There are no family relationships among any directors or executive officers of Cimarex.
Board of Directors' Meetings and Committees
During 2004, the Cimarex Board of Directors held four meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board of Directors, except Mr. Rooney who attended 50% of the meetings.
The Cimarex Board of Directors has an Audit Committee and a Governance Committee. All members of each Committee are independent within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Cimarex. The members of these committees are:
| Audit Committee |
Governance Committee |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cortlandt S. Dietler, Chairman | L. Paul Teague, Chairman | |
| Glenn A. Cox | David A. Hentschel | |
| Paul D. Holleman | L. F. Rooney, III | |
| Michael J. Sullivan |
Audit Committee. The primary purposes of the Cimarex Audit Committee are to assist the Board in monitoring (i) the integrity of Cimarex's financial statements, appropriateness of Cimarex's accounting policies and adequacy of our internal controls, (ii) qualifications and independence of Cimarex's independent auditors, (iii) performance of Cimarex's internal audit function, and (iv) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The Audit Committee operates in accordance with a Charter which has been approved by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter was appended to the proxy statement for Cimarex's annual meeting held in 2003, and is available on Cimarex's website at www.cimarex.com.
During 2004, the Audit Committee held eight meetings. Each member of the Committee attended at least 75% of all meetings. The members of the Audit Committee meet in executive session at the end of each non-telephonic meeting. The Audit Committee and the Board have established a procedure whereby complaints or concerns with respect to accounting, internal controls and auditing matters may be submitted to the Committee, which is described under "Complaint and Reporting Procedures" in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The Cimarex Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate, and that each of Messrs. Cox and Dietler has accounting or related financial management expertise, as such qualifications are defined under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, and is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Cox is a former chief financial officer of Phillips Petroleum Company, and Mr. Dietler, in his positions as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TransMontaigne, has supervised principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions. The report of the Audit Committee is included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Governance Committee. The Governance Committee operates under the Governance Committee Charter which has been approved by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is available on Cimarex's website at www.cimarex.com. The Governance Committee has two principal functions: (i) nominating and governance and (ii) compensation.
II-3
The primary purposes of the nominating and governance function are to (a) recommend individuals to the Board of Directors for nomination, election or appointment as members of the Board of Directors and its committees, consistent with the criteria included in Cimarex's Corporate Governance Guidelines, (b) oversee the evaluation of the performance of the Board of Directors and its committees and Cimarex's chief executive officer, and (c) take a leadership role in shaping the corporate governance of Cimarex. In identifying and recommending nominees for positions on the Board of Directors, the Committee places emphasis on the criteria set forth in Cimarex's Corporate Governance Guidelines, namely: (a) high personal and professional ethics, (b) integrity and values, (c) commitment to the long-term interest of the stockholders and (d) a mix of characteristics and diverse experiences, perspectives and skills appropriate to our business. The Committee does not set specific, minimum qualifications that nominees must meet, but rather believes that each nominee should be evaluated based on his or her individual merits, taking into account the business and needs of Cimarex and the composition of the Board of Directors. The Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. The Governance Committee did not receive nominations from a stockholder prior to February 21, 2005, the deadline for stockholder nominations. Stockholders who wish to submit a nominee for consideration by the Governance Committee for election at Cimarex's 2006 annual meeting of stockholders may do so during the period February 10, 2006 to February 20, 2006, by submitting in writing such nominee's name, in compliance with the procedures and along with the other information required by Cimarex's By-laws, to the Assistant Corporate Secretary, Cimarex Energy Co., 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203.
The primary purposes of the compensation function are to determine and approve the compensation of Cimarex's chief executive officer, to make recommendations to the Board with respect to other executive officer compensation and incentive compensation plans and to prepare a report on executive compensation. The Governance Committee Report on Executive Compensation is included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
During 2004, the Governance Committee held four meetings. Each member of the Committee attended at least 75% of all meetings, except Mr. Rooney who attended 50% of the meetings.
Compensation Committee Interlocks
There are no Governance Committee interlocks with any other entity.
Non-Management Directors' Meetings
In addition to the meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors described above, Cimarex's non-management directors meet in executive session following each Board meeting. Only independent directors attend the executive session held the date of the annual meeting. At the December 7, 2004 meeting, the non-management directors chose Mr. Dietler to act as the presiding director, to serve until the December 2005 Board meeting, at which time a new presiding director will be chosen.
For fiscal 2004, non-management director compensation consisted of the following annual retainer and committee and meeting fees:
| Annual Retainer | $ | 20,000 | |
| Committee Chair | $ | 5,000 | |
| Attendance at Board Meeting | $ | 1,500 | |
| Attendance at Committee Meeting | $ | 1,000 |
II-4
On May 19, 2004, 1,829 shares of restricted stock were issued to each non-management director. The restricted stock vests at the rate of one-third per year on May 19, 2005, 2006 and 2007. The number of shares issued was determined by dividing $50,000 by the average of the highest and lowest sales prices of Cimarex common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on May 19, 2004. Three of the directors elected to exchange their restricted stock for a like number of deferred compensation units payable on the date specified in the director's election form.
On March 10, 2005, upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, the Board voted to provide increased compensation to the non-management directors effective May 18, 2005. The additional compensation consists of an annual retainer of $40,000, an additional annual retainer of $10,000 to each non-management director who serves as a chairman of a committee, and a number of shares of restricted stock determined by dividing $70,000 by the average of the highest and lowest sales prices of Cimarex common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on May 18, 2005. The recommendation was based upon a review of the levels of compensation paid to directors of other companies of similar size and complexity.
Cimarex reimburses Board members for their actual expenses related to attending Board meetings. Directors who are also employees of Cimarex receive no compensation for serving as a director.
Information regarding the compensation of the persons who serve as the chief executive officer and the five most highly compensated executive officers of Cimarex is set forth below. With respect to Messrs. Merelli, Jorden, Korus, Albi and Bell, compensation for the period January 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002 was paid by Key, and with respect to Mr. Shaw, compensation for the period January 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002 was paid by Helmerich & Payne. All compensation from October 1, 2002 to December 31, 2004 was paid by Cimarex.
Effective February 28, 2005, Mr. Shaw resigned as Executive Vice President—Operations, and effective March 1, 2005, Mr. Albi was elected Executive Vice President—Operations.
Summary Compensation Table. The summary compensation table set forth below contains information regarding compensation paid to each of the named executive officers for services rendered
II-5
to Cimarex, Key and Helmerich & Payne, as applicable, in all capacities during the last three fiscal years.
| |
Annual Compensation |
Long Term Compensation |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary |
Bonus |
Other Annual Compensation(1) |
Restricted Stock Awards(2) |
Securities Underlying Options |
All Other Compensation |
|||||||||||||
| F.H. Merelli, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ $ $ |
426,667 350,000 321,000 |
$ $ $ |
700,000 375,000 300,000 |
$ |
33,472 22,701 — |
(3) (3) |
$ |
— — 3,516,480 |
— — 422,400 |
$ $ $ |
30,216 31,430 8,844 |
(4) |
||||||
Steven R. Shaw(5) Executive Vice President—Operations |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ $ $ |
319,300 319,300 319,300 |
$ $ $ |
250,000 160,000 310,000 |
$ |
— — 544 |
(7) |
$ |
— — 757,575 |
— — 91,000 |
$ $ $ |
15,965 23,107 28,811 |
(6) |
||||||
Thomas E. Jorden Executive Vice President—Exploration |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ $ $ |
250,496 192,000 178,000 |
$ $ $ |
499,374 192,000 130,000 |
— — — |
$ |
— — 757,575 |
— — 91,000 |
$ $ $ |
22,131 18,614 10,282 |
(8) |
||||||||
Paul Korus Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ $ $ |
242,500 200,000 187,251 |
$ $ $ |
363,750 160,000 113,000 |
— — — |
$ |
— — 757,575 |
— — 91,000 |
$ $ $ |
20,173 15,158 9,695 |
(9) |
||||||||
Joseph R. Albi(5) Senior Vice President—Corporate Engineering |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ $ $ |
238,815 178,000 166,000 |
$ $ $ |
341,250 151,300 110,000 |
— — — |
$ |
— — 757,575 |
— — 91,000 |
$ $ $ |
19,505 29,319 9,972 |
(10) |
||||||||
Stephen P. Bell Senior Vice President—Business Development and Land |
2004 2003 2002 |
$ $ $ |
222,283 177,000 165,000 |
$ $ $ |
321,875 141,600 99,000 |
— — — |
$ |
— — 757,575 |
— — 91,000 |
$ $ $ |
18,212 38,246 11,096 |
(11) |
||||||||
- (1)
- The
aggregate amount of perquisites and other personal benefits was less than either $50,000 or ten percent of the total annual salary and bonus reported for each of the named
executive officers.
- (2)
- The
value of the restricted stock awards represents the fair market value of common stock on December 6, 2002, the date of grant ($16.65), times the number of shares awarded to
each of the named executive officers. Effective December 1, 2003, each of the named individuals exchanged his shares of restricted stock for stock units which represent the right to receive, on
a specified payment date, a like number of shares.
- (3)
- Represents
the payment of estimated tax liability associated with the vesting of stock units.
- (4)
- Includes
matching contributions by Cimarex to its 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan of $10,250 and $19,966, respectively.
- (5)
- Effective
February 28, 2005, Mr. Shaw resigned as Executive Vice President-Operations, and effective March 1, 2005, Mr. Albi was elected Executive Vice
President—Operations.
- (6)
- Includes
matching contributions by Cimarex to its 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan of $10,250 and $5,715, respectively.
- (7)
- Represents
the payment of estimated tax liability with respect to health and retirement benefits.
- (8)
- Includes
matching contributions by Cimarex to its 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan of $10,250 and $11,881, respectively.
- (9)
- Includes
matching contributions by Cimarex to its 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan of $10,250 and $9,923, respectively.
- (10)
- Includes
matching contributions by Cimarex to its 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan of $10,250 and $9,255, respectively.
- (11)
- Includes matching contributions by Cimarex to its 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan of $10,250 and $7,962, respectively.
II-6
Option Grants in 2004
No options were granted by Cimarex to any of the named executive officers during fiscal year 2004.
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2004 and Fiscal Year 2004 Year-End Option Values
| |
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at 2004 Year End |
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at 2004 Year End |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise |
|
|||||||||||||
| Name |
Value Realized |
||||||||||||||
| Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
||||||||||||
| F.H. Merelli | — | $ | — | 543,960 | 253,440 | $ | 13,278,769 | $ | 5,377,997 | ||||||
| Steven R. Shaw | 200,000 | $ | 2,934,960 | 405,105 | 81,175 | $ | 10,161,267 | $ | 1,792,745 | ||||||
| Thomas E. Jorden | 62,200 | $ | 1,371,859 | 18,200 | 54,600 | $ | 386,204 | $ | 1,158,612 | ||||||
| Paul Korus | 41,000 | $ | 939,949 | 54,400 | 54,600 | $ | 1,279,693 | $ | 1,158,612 | ||||||
| Joseph R. Albi | 39,700 | $ | 893,512 | 38,700 | 54,600 | $ | 894,320 | $ | 1,158,612 | ||||||
| Stephen P. Bell | 32,500 | $ | 883,319 | 36,400 | 54,600 | $ | 772,408 | $ | 1,158,612 | ||||||
Equity Compensation Plan Information (as of December 31, 2004)
| Plan category |
(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(1) |
(b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 2,657,082 | $ | 14.95 | 2,436,521 | |||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 2,657,082 | $ | 14.95 | 2,436,521 | |||
- (1)
- The number of securities to be issued upon exercise does not include restricted stock awards representing 19,145 shares, as these securities are issued and outstanding, or awards of stock units representing the right to acquire 770,300 shares or awards of deferred compensation units representing the right to acquire 5,487 shares.
Employment Agreement and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers
F. H. Merelli. Mr. Merelli serves under an employment agreement that provides for annual compensation reviews by the Governance Committee. Mr. Merelli's salary may be increased as a result of the review but may not be decreased. Mr. Merelli is also entitled to receive an annual incentive bonus under any plan or program implemented for executives. The agreement has an indefinite term.
Cimarex may terminate Mr. Merelli's employment at any time for cause or after 30 days' notice if not for cause. Mr. Merelli may terminate his employment at any time for any reason. If Mr. Merelli's employment is terminated without cause or because of death or disability, or he resigns for good reason, he will receive his base salary for two years and the maximum incentive compensation payable pursuant to any Cimarex plan or program. Mr. Merelli also participates in the Change in Control Plan described below, which provides for continuation of his salary and benefits upon a Change of Control, as that term is defined in the Plan. Any payment made to Mr. Merelli under his employment agreement will be deducted from the benefits under the Change in Control Plan.
II-7
While he is with Cimarex and for three years after he leaves Cimarex, Mr. Merelli must keep confidential any information about Cimarex or its business that is not generally available to the public. Cimarex has indemnified Mr. Merelli to the maximum extent permissible under applicable law.
Messrs. Jorden, Korus, Albi and Bell. Each of Messrs. Jorden, Korus, Albi and Bell serve under employment agreements that have expired. However, each agreement provided that, if the executive continues as an employee after the term of the agreement (as each executive has done) and is terminated without cause following a change in control, the executive will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to two times the executive's base salary at the time of the change in control. Cimarex assumed this obligation following the Key reorganization. Accordingly, if Cimarex terminates the executive's employment without cause, Cimarex is obligated to make a lump-sum payment to the executive equal to two times his base salary at September 30, 2002.
Change in Control Severance Plan. On March 10, 2005, the Board of Directors adopted a Change-in-Control Severance Plan covering each employee who is actively employed by Cimarex on the date of a Change in Control, as such term is defined in the Plan. If a participant's employment is terminated by Cimarex for any reason other than Cause, death or Disability (as defined in the Plan) or by the participant for Good Reason (as defined in the Plan, including a reduction in base salary, a material reduction in annual incentive compensation opportunity, relocation greater than 50 miles from previous office location, the failure to provide comparable benefits), the participant shall be entitled to:
1. An amount equal to (a) in the case of a participant with three or more years of service, two times the participant's annual cash compensation (salary and bonus) averaged over the 24-month period immediately before termination of employment or (b) in the case of a participant who has less than three years of service, 1/24th of such participant's average annual cash compensation (salary and bonus) for each month of service earned by the participant at the date of termination, not to exceed 1.5 times the participant's annual cash compensation (salary and bonus) averaged over the 24-month period immediately before termination of employment.
2. A pro rata portion of the average annual cash incentive bonus payable to all employees in the year of termination; and
3. Medical, dental, disability and life insurance benefits for the participant and his or her family during the period of time in which cash payments are payable, as if the participant's employment had not been terminated.
The Plan also provides for a full "gross up" for any "golden parachute" excise tax imposed under the provisions of Section 4999 of the Code upon a participant in the Plan.
If a participant is entitled to separation benefits under the Plan and is also entitled to benefits under any other severance pay plan or policy of Cimarex, or any other agreement, including an employment agreement, benefits from this Plan will be offset by the amount of the benefits received under or payable in accordance with such other agreement or plan.
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Helmerich & Payne provides Cimarex with contract drilling services. Drilling costs of approximately $10.4 million were incurred by Cimarex related to such services for the year ended December 31, 2004. Hans Helmerich, a director of Cimarex, is President and Chief Executive Officer of Helmerich & Payne.
The following graph shows the total stockholder return through December 31, 2004 of an investment of $100 in cash on September 30, 2002 (the date of the spin off transaction with
II-8
Helmerich & Payne) (i) in Cimarex Energy Co.'s common stock (XEC), (ii) the S & P 500 Index and (iii) the Dow Jones U.S. Exploration and Production index. Historic stock price performance is not indicative of future stock price performance.
COMPARISON OF 27 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG CIMAREX ENERGY CO., THE S & P 500 INDEX
AND THE DOW JONES US EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDEX
- *
- $100 invested on 9/30/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.
Copyright © 2002, Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm
Cimarex Energy—NYSE
| |
Cumulative Total Return |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
9/02 |
12/02 |
12/03 |
12/04 |
||||
| CIMAREX ENERGY CO. | 100.00 | 103.77 | 154.72 | 219.71 | ||||
| S & P 500 | 100.00 | 108.44 | 139.54 | 154.73 | ||||
| DOW JONES US EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION | 100.00 | 104.58 | 137.06 | 194.45 | ||||
II-9
Governance Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Governance Committee performs nominating, corporate governance and compensation functions. The Committee administers Cimarex's executive compensation program and establishes the salaries of our executive officers. The Committee consists of only non-management directors who are appointed by the Board of Directors.
The Committee's objective is to provide Cimarex executive officers with a comprehensive compensation package that is designed to encourage recipients to identify and take actions that will achieve short-and long-term objectives. The compensation policies and programs utilized by the Governance Committee have been reviewed by independent compensation consultants and endorsed by the Board of Directors and generally consist of the following:
- •
- Provide
executive officer total compensation in relation to the performance of Cimarex;
- •
- Provide
a compensation program competitive with that received by executives of comparable companies in the oil and gas industry in order to attract, motivate and retain
qualified personnel;
- •
- Provide
a management tool for focusing and directing the energies of key executives toward achieving individual and corporate objectives; and
- •
- Provide long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock and stock unit awards to link individual success to that of Cimarex.
Cimarex's executive compensation consists of three key components: base salary, annual incentive compensation in the form of cash bonuses, and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity based compensation, each of which is intended to complement the others and, collectively, satisfy Cimarex's compensation objectives. The Governance Committee's policies with respect to each of the three components are discussed below.
Base Salary. Each fiscal year the Governance Committee reviews and approves the annual salary of the Chief Executive Officer; and the Committee, along with the Chief Executive Officer, reviews and recommends for Board approval the annual salaries for our executive officers. Many factors are included in determining base salaries, such as the responsibilities borne by the executive officer, a comparison of the compensation of the executive with the compensation of other executives in comparable industries with similar responsibilities, the scope of the position and corporate and individual performance.
Cash Bonuses. The Governance Committee provides annual incentives to Cimarex executive officers in the form of cash bonuses. Criteria that determine bonuses include company performance compared to external benchmarks, operational and financial performance and internally set objectives.
Equity-Based Compensation. The primary objective of the equity-based program is to link the interests of executive officers and other selected employees with the stockholders. The Cimarex Energy Co. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the Committee to grant incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock units to officers and other employees meeting certain criteria. Subject to general limits prescribed by the Stock Incentive Plan, the Governance Committee has the authority to determine the individuals to whom equity compensation is awarded, the terms of the awards and the number of shares of common stock subject to the awards. The size of any particular award is based upon the employee's position with Cimarex and individual performance.
Chief Executive Officer's Compensation. As discussed under "Employment Agreements," Cimarex is a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Merelli. The salary determined by the Governance Committee for Mr. Merelli was based upon the compensation paid to chief executive officers of
II-10
comparable companies and the Governance Committee's recognition of Mr. Merelli's continued leadership of Cimarex.
| THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE L. Paul Teague, Chairman David A. Hentschel L.F. Rooney, III |
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP to audit Cimarex's financial statements for 2005. KPMG has been Cimarex's independent auditors since October 1, 2002.
Cimarex is asking that stockholders ratify the appointment of KPMG as independent auditors. If stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of KPMG, the Audit Committee may reconsider this appointment. A KPMG representative will be at the annual meeting to answer appropriate questions and to make a statement if he or she desires.
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees and costs paid to KPMG during the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered to Cimarex:
| |
Years Ended December 31, |
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
|
|||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 655,401 | $ | 165,476 | ||||
| Audit-Related Fees | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
| Tax Fees | $ | 77,713 | * | $ | 134,656 | |||
| All Other Fees, including Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
- *
- Includes review of Federal and state tax returns, Federal and state tax compliance issues and consultation related to treatment of state franchise tax issues.
The Audit Committee annually reviews and pre-approves certain categories of audit, audit-related and tax services to be performed by Cimarex's independent auditor, subject to a specified range of fees. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve specific services. Certain non-audit services as specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission may not be performed by Cimarex's independent auditor. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. In the event of any such delegation, any pre-approved decisions will be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The services described above and the related fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in 2003 and 2004.
The Audit Committee oversees Cimarex's financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors, including Cimarex's internal controls, the quality of its financial reporting and the independence and performance of Cimarex's independent auditors. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which was attached to the Proxy Statement for the 2003 annual meeting of stockholders and is available on our website at www.cimarex.com.
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the overall reporting process of Cimarex, including Cimarex's system of internal controls. The independent auditors audit the
II-11
annual financial statements prepared by management, express an opinion as to whether those financial statements fairly present the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Cimarex and its subsidiaries in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The independent auditors also audit the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and express an opinion on management's assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee reviewed Cimarex's audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 and met with both management and KPMG, Cimarex's independent auditors, to discuss those financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Management has represented to us that the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the Company's internal controls over financial reporting are effective in both design and operation. KPMG has informed us that their opinions regarding both Cimarex's financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting are unqualified.
We have received from KPMG the communication required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, and discussed with KPMG their independence from Cimarex and its management. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG any matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees.
Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that Cimarex's audited financial statements be included in Cimarex's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
| THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Cortlandt S. Dietler, Chairman Glenn A. Cox Paul D. Holleman Michael J. Sullivan |
Cimarex has one class of voting securities outstanding. On April 29, 2005, there were 41,786,219 shares of common stock outstanding, with each share entitled to one vote.
Directors and Executive Officers
Common Stock. The following table shows, as of April 15, 2005, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each director and nominee, each of the executive officers named
II-12
in the Summary Compensation Table set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation," and all directors and executive officers as a group.
| Name of Beneficial Owner |
Shares Owned(1) |
Option Shares(2) |
Beneficial Ownership Total |
Percent of Class |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F.H. Merelli | 234,247 | 543,960 | 778,207 | 1.8 | % | ||||
| Glenn A. Cox | 5,015 | 6,667 | 11,682 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Cortlandt S. Dietler | 105,329 | 49,167 | 154,496 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Hans Helmerich | 97,976 | (3) | 6,667 | 104,643 | (3) | <1.0 | % | ||
| David A. Hentschel | 3,829 | 6,667 | 10,496 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Paul D. Holleman | 3,829 | 31,667 | 35,496 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| L.F. Rooney, III | 19,366 | 6,667 | 26,033 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Michael J. Sullivan | 2,500 | 6,667 | 9,167 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| L. Paul Teague | 44,170 | 13,334 | 57,504 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Thomas E. Jorden | 10,497 | 18,200 | 28,697 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Paul Korus | 7,866 | 49,400 | 57,266 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Joseph R. Albi | 7,197 | 38,700 | 45,897 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| Stephen P. Bell | — | 36,400 | 36,400 | <1.0 | % | ||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) | 551,027 | 837,163 | 1,388,190 | 3.3 | % |
- (1)
- Includes
equivalent shares of common stock held by the trustee for the benefit of employee participants in the Cimarex Energy Co. 401(k) Plan. Participants in this plan instruct the
trustee as to how the participant's equivalent shares should be voted.
- (2)
- Shares
of common stock that could be purchased by the exercise of stock options within the 60-day period following April 15, 2005 under the Cimarex Energy Co. 2002
Stock Incentive Plan.
- (3)
- Includes 11,450 shares held by Mr. Helmerich's spouse and 7,865 shares held for various trusts for immediate family members of which Mr. Helmerich is trustee. Mr. Helmerich disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
Stock Units. Executive officers own restricted stock units that are not payable in shares of common stock until the eighth anniversary of the date of grant. The following table shows as of April 15, 2005, the number of stock units owned by each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation," and all executive officers as a group. The stock units do not have voting rights, but the holders of the units are entitled to receive cash payments equal to any cash dividends and other distributions paid in cash on our common stock.
| Name of Unit Holder |
Number of Units Owned |
|
|---|---|---|
| F. H. Merelli | 211,200 | |
| Thomas E. Jorden | 45,500 | |
| Paul Korus | 45,500 | |
| Joseph R. Albi | 45,500 | |
| Stephen P. Bell | 45,500 | |
| All executive officers as a group (8 persons) | 467,700 |
Messrs. Helmerich, Sullivan and Teague, directors of Cimarex, each hold 1,829 deferred compensation units that represent the right to receive one share of Cimarex common stock at the time provided in the director's deferred compensation election. The deferred compensation units do not have voting rights, but the holders of the units are entitled to receive cash payments equal to any cash dividends paid on Cimarex common stock.
II-13
Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent
The following table lists those stockholders who beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock. This information is based on filings by the reporting persons with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
| |
Voting Authority |
Dispositive Authority |
|
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name and Address |
Total Amount of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class |
|||||||||||
| Sole |
Shared |
Sole |
Shared |
||||||||||
| Barclays Global Investors and affiliates 45 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 |
2,330,750 | 0 | 2,586,883 | 0 | 2,586,883 | 6.2 | % | ||||||
Neuberger Berman Inc. 605 Third Ave. NY, NY 10158-3698 |
440,493 |
1,526,547 |
0 |
2,688,974 |
2,688,974 |
6.4 |
% |
||||||
Royce & Associates LLC 1414 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 |
2,708,010 |
0 |
2,708,010 |
0 |
2,708,010 |
6.5 |
% |
||||||
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance One State Farm Plaza Bloomington, IL 61710 |
2,194,205 |
9,346 |
2,194,205 |
9,346 |
2,203,551 |
5.3 |
% |
||||||
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Cimarex's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of its common stock, to file reports of ownership of, and transactions in, Cimarex common stock with the SEC. The reports by such persons are published on Cimarex's website at http://www.cimarex.com. Based on a review of such reports, and on written representations from our reporting persons, Cimarex believes that all reports were timely filed in 2004, except forms reporting the exchange by Messrs. Helmerich, Sullivan and Teague of 1,829 shares of restricted stock for a like number of deferred compensation units were not timely filed.
To the extent that this joint proxy statement/prospectus is incorporated by reference into any other filing by Cimarex under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Governance Committee Report on Executive Compensation," and "Report of the Audit Committee" and "Stock Price Performance" will not be deemed incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing.
There are no other matters that the Board of Directors intends to present, or has reason to believe others will present, at the Cimarex annual meeting. If other matters come before the annual meeting, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment with respect to such matters.
II-14
Complaint and Reporting Procedures
Cimarex has established complaint and reporting procedures, which are posted on Cimarex's website at www.cimarex.com. Any person, whether or not an employee, who has a concern about the conduct of Cimarex or any of its people, including accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing issues, may, in a confidential or anonymous manner, communicate that concern by calling Cimarex's confidential hotline, 1-866-519-1898. Any interested party, whether or not an employee, who wishes to communicate directly with the presiding non-management director or with Cimarex's non-management directors as a group, also may call the confidential hotline. The hotline is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week and is completely confidential. Comments will be typed verbatim and will be delivered to a representative with authority to investigate the concern.
II-15
CHAPTER III—THE STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS, VOTING AND OTHER INFORMATION
Cimarex is furnishing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to its common stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Cimarex board of directors for use at the annual meeting of its stockholders. This joint proxy statement/prospectus and form of proxy will be mailed to Cimarex stockholders on approximately May 6, 2005.
The board of directors of Cimarex, by unanimous vote of the directors present at their meeting:
- •
- has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Cimarex and its stockholders;
- •
- has approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby;
- •
- recommends that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger;
- •
- recommends that the stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" approval of the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter and the Cimarex incentive plan that
are described below;
- •
- recommends that stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" each of the named nominees for director; and
- •
- recommends that stockholders of Cimarex vote "FOR" the ratification of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005.
The Cimarex annual meeting is scheduled to be held in the Central City Room at the Brown Palace Hotel, 321 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, on June 6, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. local time.
The purpose of the Cimarex annual meeting is to consider and vote upon:
- •
- the
issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger agreement, dated as of January 25, 2005, as amended on February 18, 2005 and
April 20, 2005, by and among Cimarex, Magnum Hunter and Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex, under which Merger Sub will be merged with and into Magnum Hunter;
- •
- a
proposal to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100 million shares to 200 million shares;
- •
- a
proposal to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum size of the board of directors from nine to ten directors;
- •
- a
proposal to amend the Cimarex incentive plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan from seven million shares to 12.7 million
shares and make other changes to the Cimarex incentive plan as discussed under the caption "Chapter I—The Merger—Other Merger-Related Proposals to Be Presented at the
Cimarex Annual Meeting—Proposal to Amend the Cimarex Incentive Plan" on page I-137;
- •
- a
proposal to elect three directors to serve until the 2008 annual meeting; and
- •
- a proposal to ratify the audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005; and
III-1
- •
- to the extent permitted under the merger agreement, such other matters as may be appropriate for consideration at the annual meeting.
Approval of the proposal to issue Cimarex common stock in the merger is a condition to the closing of the merger. Approval of the proposals to amend the Cimarex charter and the Cimarex incentive plan is not a condition to the closing of the merger. Neither of the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter will be effected unless the merger takes place. The proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan will be effected whether or not the merger closes.
Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Cimarex stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 29, 2005, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. Cimarex's common stock is the only class of voting securities of Cimarex. On the record date, there were 41,786,219 shares of Cimarex common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
Each share of common stock you own as of the April 29, 2005 record date entitles you to one vote. The number of shares you own is shown on your proxy card beneath and to the right of your name.
In order to conduct business at the annual meeting, Cimarex must have a quorum. This means that greater than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the close of business on the April 29, 2005 record date must be represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when a broker returns a proxy but does not have authority to vote on a particular proposal. If a quorum is not present at the meeting, a vote for adjournment will be taken among the stockholders present or represented by proxy. If a majority of the stockholders present or represented by proxy vote for adjournment, it is Cimarex's intention to adjourn the annual meeting until a later date and to vote proxies at the adjourned meeting.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting is required to approve the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in connection with the merger and the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock as of the record date of the Cimarex annual meeting is required to approve each of the proposed amendments to the Cimarex charter. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes. A "plurality" means that the three director nominees receiving the most "FOR" votes will be elected as Class III directors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting is required to ratify the audit committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as Cimarex's independent auditors for 2005.
Abstentions may be specified with respect to the proposal by properly marking the "ABSTAIN" box on the proxy for that proposal or by making the same election by telephone or Internet voting. Abstentions, broker non-votes and failures to vote will not affect the outcome of the vote on the proposals to issue shares in the merger, amend the Cimarex incentive plan or ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors for 2005, since they will not be counted as votes either for or against these proposals. Abstentions, broker non-votes and failures to vote will count as votes against each of the proposals to amend the Cimarex charter. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have an effect on the votes for or against the election of a director.
III-2
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York, Cimarex's stock transfer agent, will receive proxies and ballots, tabulate the vote, determine whether a quorum exists and serve as inspector of election at the annual meeting.
Share Ownership of Cimarex Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Stockholders
At the close of business on the record date and excluding shares underlying options and restricted stock, Cimarex's directors and executive officers and their affiliates may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of, and have the power to vote, 1,393,190 shares of Cimarex common stock, representing approximately 3.3% of the then outstanding shares of Cimarex common stock entitled to vote at the Cimarex annual meeting. Cimarex believes that each of its directors and executive officers intends to vote "FOR" the approval of the issuance of shares of Cimarex common stock in the merger, "FOR" each proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter, "FOR" the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan, "FOR" the election of each of the named nominees for director and "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors for 2005.
Cimarex provides several options for Cimarex stockholders to cast their vote. You may attend the meeting and vote in person or you can vote in any one of the following three ways:
- •
- by
telephone by following the instructions on either the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form; or
- •
- on
the Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card; or
- •
- by signing and returning the proxy card in the enclosed postage paid envelope.
Shares of Cimarex common stock represented by properly executed proxies received before the annual meeting will be voted at the annual meeting in the manner specified on the proxies. Physical proxies that are properly executed and timely submitted but which do not contain specific voting instructions will be voted "FOR" each of the proposals presented at the Cimarex annual meeting.
Cimarex stockholders whose shares are held in "street name" (i.e., in the name of a broker, bank or other record holder) must either direct the record holder of their shares as to how to vote their shares or obtain a proxy from the record holder to vote at the annual meeting. If you do not provide voting instructions (commonly referred to as "broker non-votes"), your shares will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but will not be voted in favor of any of the proposals presented at the Cimarex annual meeting. Broker non-votes will be considered as abstentions and will not affect the outcome of the vote to approve the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger, or the proposed amendment to the Cimarex incentive plan or the ratification of KPMG LLP as independent auditors for 2005, since they will not be counted as votes either for or against the proposal. Broker non-votes will be counted as votes against each proposed amendment to the Cimarex charter. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the votes for or against the election of a director.
Cimarex stockholders may receive more than one proxy or voting card depending on how they hold their shares. If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, you may receive material from them asking how you want to vote your shares. Please vote each proxy you receive.
If you are a participant in the Cimarex Energy Co. 401(k) Plan, you will receive a proxy card for the Cimarex shares you own through the 401(k) Plan. That proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee of the 401(k) Plan, and your 401(k) Plan shares will be voted as you instruct. If you do not sign and return your voting instruction card to indicate your instructions, the 401(k) Plan trustee will vote your 401(k) Plan shares in the same proportion as the shares voted by other plan participants.
III-3
Cimarex recommends you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the meeting. You may always change your vote at the meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other nominee and would like to attend the annual meeting and vote in person, you will need to bring an account statement as of the close of business on April 29, 2005. Alternatively, you may contact the person in whose name your shares are registered and obtain a proxy and bring it to the annual meeting.
Cimarex stockholders may revoke their proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date (either by telephone, on the Internet, or by returning a new proxy card), by voting in person at the meeting, or by notifying Cimarex's Assistant Corporate Secretary in writing at 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203-4518.
Attending the annual meeting will not by itself revoke your proxy. To do so, you must vote in person at the meeting. If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker's directions in order to change your vote.
Cimarex will bear all costs of the solicitation of proxies, including the costs of printing and mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Cimarex stockholders and reimbursements to brokerage firms and others for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials. In addition to solicitation by mail, solicitation of proxies may be made by certain officers and regular employees of Cimarex by mail, telephone or in person. Cimarex also has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc. to aid in the solicitation of brokers, banks, intermediaries, and other institutional holders in the United States for a fee not to exceed $15,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.
If a quorum is not present at the time the Cimarex annual meeting is convened, or if for any other reason Cimarex believes that additional time should be allowed for the solicitation of proxies, Cimarex may adjourn the annual meeting with or without a vote of the stockholders. If Cimarex proposes to adjourn the annual meeting by a vote of the stockholders, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote all shares of Cimarex common stock for which they have voting authority in favor of an adjournment. Proxies voted against the proposal related to the issuance of Cimarex common stock in the merger will not be voted in favor of any adjournment of the annual meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies.
Cimarex does not expect that any matter not referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus will be presented for action at the Cimarex annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting, the persons named in the proxies will have discretion to vote on those matters according to their best judgment. The grant of a proxy will also confer discretionary authority on the persons named in the proxy as proxy appointees to vote in accordance with their best judgment on matters incidental to the conduct of the annual meeting.
THE MAGNUM HUNTER SPECIAL MEETING
Magnum Hunter is furnishing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to its common stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Magnum Hunter board of directors for use at the special meeting of its stockholders. Magnum Hunter is also furnishing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the holders of its Series A preferred stock to provide them with notice of the meeting as required by Nevada law. This joint proxy statement/prospectus will be mailed to Magnum Hunter common stockholders and Series A preferred stockholders, and the form of proxy will be mailed to Magnum Hunter common stockholders, on approximately May 6, 2005.
III-4
- •
- has determined that the merger agreement, the merger, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, and the other transactions contemplated
thereby are fair to, and in the best interests of, Magnum Hunter and its stockholders;
- •
- has approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby; and
- •
- recommends that the stockholders of Magnum Hunter vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
The board of directors of Magnum Hunter unanimously:
The Magnum Hunter special meeting is scheduled to be held at the Four Seasons Resort and Club, 4150 North MacArthur Blvd., Irving, Texas 75038, on June 6, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. local time.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
The purpose of the special meeting is to consider and vote upon the merger agreement, dated as of January 25, 2005, as amended on February 18, 2005 and April 20, 2005, by and among Cimarex, Magnum Hunter and Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex, under which Merger Sub will be merged with and into Magnum Hunter, and, to the extent permitted under the merger agreement, such other matters as may be appropriate for consideration at the special meeting. Approval of this proposal is a condition to the closing of the merger.
Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Holders of Magnum Hunter's common stock at the close of business on April 15, 2005, the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the special meeting. Magnum Hunter's common stock will be the only class of securities of Magnum Hunter entitled to vote on the proposal. On the record date, approximately 95,187,747 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting. Holders of Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock at the close of business on April 15, 2005, the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of the special meeting but are not entitled to vote at the special meeting. Although Magnum Hunter's Series A preferred stock does not have voting rights with respect to the proposal, Nevada law requires Magnum Hunter to give the Series A preferred stockholders notice of the special meeting. Because all shares of Magnum Hunter's 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock are currently held by a wholly owned subsidiary of Magnum Hunter, they are not considered "outstanding" and are not entitled to vote on the proposal.
Owners of record of Magnum Hunter common stock on the record date are each entitled to one vote per share with respect to the approval of the merger agreement.
A quorum of Magnum Hunter stockholders is necessary to have a valid meeting of stockholders. The presence at the Magnum Hunter special meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of one-third of the outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock will constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes count as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. An abstention occurs when a stockholder attends a meeting, either in person or by proxy, but abstains from voting. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instructions are given.
III-5
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting is required to approve the merger agreement and the merger. Abstentions may be specified with respect to the proposal by properly marking the "ABSTAIN" box on the proxy for that proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and failures to vote will have the effect of votes cast against the proposal.
Share Ownership of Magnum Hunter Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Stockholders
At the close of business on the record date and excluding shares underlying options, Magnum Hunter's directors and executive officers and their affiliates may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of, and have the power to vote, 6,080,496 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, representing approximately 6.3% of the then outstanding shares of Magnum Hunter common stock entitled to vote at the Magnum Hunter special meeting. Magnum Hunter believes that each of its directors and executive officers intends to vote "FOR" the approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
On the date the merger agreement was executed, Gary C. Evans, Magnum Hunter's former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc. a related stockholder, entered into a voting agreement with Cimarex. As of March 31, 2005, these stockholders beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 3,943,794 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, which represented approximately 4.1% of the shares of Magnum Hunter common stock outstanding on that date. Under the voting agreement, these stockholders have agreed, among other things, to vote all of their shares of Magnum Hunter common stock in favor of the merger agreement, against any action or agreement that they would reasonably expect to result in a material breach of any covenant, representation, warranty or other obligation of Magnum Hunter under the merger agreement and against any other takeover proposal. The voting agreement is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Magnum Hunter stockholders may cast their vote by attending the meeting and voting in person or by signing and returning the proxy card in the enclosed postage paid envelope.
Shares of Magnum Hunter common stock represented by properly executed proxies received before the special meeting will be voted at the special meeting in the manner specified on the proxies. Physical proxies that are properly executed and timely submitted but which do not contain specific voting instructions will be voted "FOR" the proposal presented at the Magnum Hunter special meeting.
Magnum Hunter stockholders whose shares are held in "street name" (i.e., in the name of a broker, bank or other record holder) must either direct the record holder of their shares as to how to vote their shares or obtain a proxy from the record holder to vote at the special meeting. If you do not provide voting instructions (commonly referred to as "broker non-votes"), your shares will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but will not be voted in favor of the proposal presented at the Magnum Hunter special meeting. Broker non-votes will be counted as votes against the approval of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Magnum Hunter stockholders may receive more than one proxy or voting card depending on how they hold their shares. If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, you may receive material from them asking how you want to vote your shares. Please vote each proxy you receive.
If you are a participant in the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan, the trustee of the plan's related trust will vote all shares of Magnum Hunter common stock held in trust, though you as a participant may direct the trustee regarding how to vote any shares allocated
III-6
to your plan account. You will receive voting instructions from the trustee as to how to exercise your voting rights under the plan. If you do not exercise your right to vote the shares allocated to your plan account, the trustee will vote those shares in accordance with the terms of the plan and trust. Unallocated shares held by the trustee also will be voted by the trustee in accordance with the terms of the plan and trust.
If you are a participant in the Magnum Hunter, Inc. 2003 Bonus Deferral Plan, you will receive a proxy card for the Magnum Hunter shares that are credited to your bookkeeping account. That proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for the Plan committee and those shares will be voted as you instruct. If you do not sign and return your voting instruction card to the Plan committee, the Plan committee will direct the manner in which your shares are voted.
Magnum Hunter recommends you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the meeting. You may always change your vote at the meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other nominee and would like to attend the special meeting and vote in person, you will need to bring an account statement as of the close of business on April 15, 2005. Alternatively, you may contact the person in whose name your shares are registered and obtain a proxy and bring it to the special meeting.
Magnum Hunter stockholders may revoke their proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy card with a later date, by voting in person at the meeting, or by notifying Magnum Hunter's Secretary at 600 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039.
Attending the special meeting will not by itself revoke your proxy. To do so, you must vote in person at the meeting. If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker's directions in order to change your vote.
Cimarex will bear the costs of printing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and Magnum Hunter will bear the costs of mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Magnum Hunter stockholders and the costs of soliciting proxies from Magnum Hunter stockholders, including reimbursements to brokerage firms and others for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials. In addition to solicitation by mail, solicitation of proxies may be made by certain officers and regular employees of Magnum Hunter by mail, telephone or in person. Magnum Hunter also has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc. to aid in the solicitation of brokers, banks, intermediaries, and other institutional holders in the United States for a fee not to exceed $11,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.
If a quorum is not present at the time the Magnum Hunter special meeting is convened, or if for any other reason Magnum Hunter believes that additional time should be allowed for the solicitation of proxies, Magnum Hunter may adjourn the special meeting with or without a vote of the stockholders. If Magnum Hunter proposes to adjourn the special meeting by a vote of the stockholders, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote all shares of Magnum Hunter common stock for which they have voting authority in favor of an adjournment.
Magnum Hunter does not expect that any matter not referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus will be presented for action at the Magnum Hunter special meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the special meeting, the persons named in the proxies will have discretion to vote on those matters according to their best judgment. The grant of a proxy will also confer discretionary authority on the persons named in the proxy as proxy appointees to vote in accordance with their best judgment on matters incidental to the conduct of the special meeting. Proxies voted against the proposal related to the merger will not be voted in favor of any adjournment of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies.
Holders of Magnum Hunter common stock and Magnum Hunter Series A preferred stock should not send their stock certificates at this time. If the merger is completed, a separate letter of transmittal will be mailed to you, which will enable you to receive the appropriate consideration.
III-7
The validity of the issuance of the shares of Cimarex's common stock to be issued to Magnum Hunter stockholders in the merger will be passed upon for Cimarex by Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, Colorado.
Certain United States federal income tax consequences of the merger will be passed upon for Cimarex by Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, Colorado and for Magnum Hunter by Thompson & Knight L.L.P., Dallas, Texas.
The consolidated financial statements of Cimarex as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 have been incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by reference herein, and upon authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. Their reports refer to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," as of January 1, 2003.
The consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to changes in methods of accounting for asset retirement obligations and employee stock based compensation in 2003 as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123") and have been so included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in auditing and accounting.
Ryder Scott Company, L.P., independent petroleum engineers, has reviewed Cimarex's proved reserve estimates associated with approximately 80 percent of the discounted future net cash flows before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Estimated quantities of Cimarex's oil and gas reserves and the net present value of such reserves have been included and incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in reliance on the authority of said firms as experts in petroleum engineering.
The estimated reserve evaluations and related calculations for Magnum Hunter of DeGolyer and MacNaughton and Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., each independent petroleum engineering consultants, included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus have been so included in reliance on the authority of said firms as experts in petroleum engineering.
III-8
Representatives of KPMG LLP, current independent accountants of Cimarex, are expected to be present at the Cimarex annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP, current independent accountants of Magnum Hunter, are expected to be present at the Magnum Hunter special meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
CIMAREX 2006 ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING AND STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any stockholder wishing to submit a proposal for the vote of the stockholders at Cimarex's 2006 annual meeting must submit such proposal or proposals in writing to Cimarex no later than December 21, 2005. Proposals should be sent to the attention of the Assistant Corporate Secretary at 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203. Cimarex is not required to include in its proxy statement a form of proxy or stockholder proposal that is received after that date or otherwise fails to meet the requirements for stockholder proposals established by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As required by Cimarex's By-laws, a stockholder must give timely notice of a nomination for election as a director. A notice is timely if received no earlier than February 10, 2006 and no later than February 20, 2006. The advance notice must be delivered to the attention of the Assistant Corporate Secretary at 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800, Denver, Colorado 80203, and must comply with the requirements of Cimarex's By-Laws.
MAGNUM HUNTER 2005 ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING AND STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Magnum Hunter will hold an annual meeting in 2005 only if the merger has not already been completed. In order to be included in the proxy statement for the 2005 annual meeting of Magnum Hunter's stockholders, stockholder proposals must have been received by Magnum Hunter by January 31, 2005, in order to be considered for inclusion in Magnum Hunter's proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Cimarex and Magnum Hunter file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC's public reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of documents filed by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter with the SEC are also available at the offices of The New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street New York, New York 10005.
Cimarex has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC under the Securities Act to register the Cimarex common stock to be issued in connection with the merger. This joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes the prospectus of Cimarex filed as part of the registration statement. This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information that Cimarex stockholders and Magnum Hunter stockholders can find in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration statement because certain parts of the registration statement are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The registration statement and its exhibits contain important information about Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and their respective business, financial condition and results of operations and are available for inspection and copying as indicated above.
III-9
The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" into this joint proxy statement/prospectus documents filed with the SEC by Cimarex. This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and later information that Cimarex files with the Securities and Exchange Commission will update and supersede that information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any documents filed by Cimarex under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and before the date of the Cimarex annual meeting and the Magnum Hunter special meeting, excluding any information furnished under Item 7.01 or Item 2.02 of any current report on Form 8-K:
| Cimarex's Filings (SEC File No. 001-31446) |
Periods |
|
|---|---|---|
| Annual Report on Form 10-K | Year ended December 31, 2004 | |
| Current Reports on Form 8-K | Filed on January 26, January 28, February 23, March 14, March 18 and April 8, 2005 | |
| The description of Cimarex's common stock and preferred stock contained in Amendment No. 1 to Cimarex's Registration Statement on Form 10 | Filed on September 23, 2002 |
Cimarex also incorporates by reference additional documents that may be filed with the SEC under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date of the Cimarex annual meeting and the Magnum Hunter special meeting. These include periodic reports, such as Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as proxy statements, excluding any information furnished under Item 7.01 or Item 2.02 of any current report on Form 8-K.
If you are a Cimarex stockholder, Cimarex may have sent you some of the documents incorporated by reference, but you can obtain any of them through Cimarex, the SEC or the SEC's Internet web site as described above. Documents incorporated by reference are available from the companies without charge, excluding all exhibits, except that if the companies have specifically incorporated by reference an exhibit in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exhibit will also be provided without charge. Stockholders may obtain documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Cimarex at the following address:
| Cimarex Energy Co. 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800 Denver, Colorado 80203-4518 Attn: Mary Kay Rohrer, Assistant Corporate Secretary (303) 295-3995 |
Your request must be received no later than five business days before the Cimarex annual meeting or the Magnum Hunter special meeting, as applicable, in order to obtain timely delivery of any materials that you request.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, the securities offered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom or from whom it is unlawful to make such offer, solicitation of an offer or proxy solicitation in such jurisdiction. Neither the delivery of this joint proxy statement/prospectus nor any distribution of securities under this joint proxy statement/prospectus shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the information set forth or incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference or in the affairs of
III-10
Cimarex or Magnum Hunter since the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus with respect to Cimarex was provided by Cimarex and the information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus with respect to Magnum Hunter was provided by Magnum Hunter.
You should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus to vote on the approval of the merger agreement. Neither Cimarex, Magnum Hunter nor Merger Sub has authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated as of the date set forth on the cover page. You should not assume that the information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other that this date and neither the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to stockholders nor the delivery of shares of Cimarex's common stock in the merger shall create any implications to the contrary.
III-11
CHAPTER IV—MAGNUM HUNTER BUSINESS &
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The selected historical financial data sets forth Magnum Hunter's summary historical consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for those years. The selected historical financial data is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. For additional information relating to Magnum Hunter's operations, see "Business" and "Properties." Certain reclassifications have been made to the selected historical financial data of the prior years, as well as to certain quarterly financial data, to conform with the current presentation. All data is in thousands, except per share data.
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement Data: | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 493,726 | $ | 325,014 | $ | 265,869 | $ | 152,806 | $ | 127,510 | |||||||
| Operating costs and expenses(a) | (287,793 | ) | (232,316 | ) | (197,000 | ) | (104,755 | ) | (77,181 | ) | |||||||
| Operating profit | 205,933 | 92,698 | 68,869 | 48,051 | 50,329 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for impairment of investment(b) | — | — | (621 | ) | (7,123 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt(c) | (12,250 | ) | (6,716 | ) | (1,000 | ) | (490 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle, net of tax(d) | — | 399 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Net Income | 103,573 | 26,117 | 15,522 | 13,516 | 22,260 | ||||||||||||
| Dividends applicable to preferred shares(e) | — | — | — | — | (9,708 | ) | |||||||||||
| Income applicable to common shares | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | $ | 13,516 | $ | 12,552 | ||||||||
| Income per common share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic(e) | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||
| Diluted(e) | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.51 | |||||||
| Income (loss) per common share after cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic(e) | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||
| Diluted(e) | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.51 | |||||||
Other Data: |
|||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets | $ | 22,902 | $ | 17,123 | $ | 95,988 | $ | 1,124 | $ | 43,770 | |||||||
| Capital expenditures(f) | $ | 540,010 | $ | 175,535 | $ | 141,046 | $ | 204,370 | $ | 60,830 | |||||||
- (a)
- Includes
in 2001 a provision for loss of $3.2 million related to the Enron bankruptcy.
- (b)
- Includes in 2002 and 2001 a provision for $621 thousand and $2.1 million, respectively, for the impairment of available-for-sale equity securities deemed by Magnum Hunter's management to have suffered an other than temporary impairment. The impairment was determined using a quoted market price at December 31, 2001 of $0.86 per share. Magnum Hunter had previously reported losses in accumulated other comprehensive income of $507 thousand ($466 thousand net of income tax benefit) through December 31, 2001. Also included in 2001 was an impairment
IV-1
provision of $5.0 million due to the bankruptcy of a privately held company in which Magnum Hunter owned a minority interest and had invested $4.5 million in equity securities and $453 thousand in secured loans.
- (c)
- Includes
in 2004 the cost of retirement of $105 million in principal of Magnum Hunter's 9.6% Senior Notes due March 15, 2012. Includes in 2003 the cost of retirement of
$129.5 million in principal of Magnum Hunter's 10% Senior Notes due June 1, 2007. Includes in 2002 the costs associated with the amendment of Magnum Hunter's Facility in connection with
the Prize merger. Includes in 2001 the cost of retirement of $10.5 million of Magnum Hunter's 10% Senior Notes.
- (d)
- Includes
in 2003 the cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle due to the adoption of SFAS No. 143 relating to asset retirement obligations. The
cumulative effect was a gain of $399 thousand, net of income tax expense of $244 thousand.
- (e)
- Includes
the effect in the year 2000 of the payment of a $5.5 million fee upon redemption of $25.0 million (liquidation value) of Magnum Hunter's 1999 Series A 8%
convertible preferred stock. The fee was treated as a dividend, reducing income per common share, basic and diluted, by $0.26 per share and $0.17 per share, respectively, for the year 2000.
- (f)
- Capital expenditures include cash expended for acquisitions plus normal additions to oil and natural gas properties and other fixed assets. It does not include the cost of property acquired through the issuance of common stock and does not include cash adjustments for liabilities assumed in the New Mexico property acquisition during 2004.
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 1,496,912 | $ | 1,095,883 | $ | 1,001,609 | $ | 419,837 | $ | 260,532 | |||||
| Total assets | 1,702,501 | 1,265,892 | 1,169,656 | 454,385 | 315,612 | ||||||||||
| Total debt(a) | 645,500 | 597,500 | 570,837 | 288,583 | 191,139 | ||||||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | $ | 679,813 | $ | 389,676 | $ | 350,196 | $ | 117,974 | $ | 93,416 | |||||
- (a)
- Consists of current notes payable and long-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt, and excluding production payment liabilities of $12 thousand, $114 thousand, $203 thousand, $359 thousand as of December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. As of December 31, 2002 and 2000, $7.0 million and $20.6 million, respectively, of the debt was non-recourse to Magnum Hunter.
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash Flow Data: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities | $ | 300,610 | $ | 162,638 | $ | 83,403 | $ | 104,074 | $ | 49,466 | ||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | (513,939 | ) | (159,675 | ) | (89,420 | ) | (203,989 | ) | (20,008 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | $ | 214,978 | $ | 12,661 | $ | 6,331 | $ | 102,661 | $ | (31,014 | ) | |||||
IV-2
The following tables set forth unaudited summary financial results on a quarterly basis for the two most recent years. All data is in thousands, except per share data.
| |
2004 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 100,378 | $ | 110,036 | $ | 128,460 | $ | 154,852 | ||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 25,480 | 27,645 | 35,226 | 38,828 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | 40,608 | 44,963 | 52,255 | 68,107 | ||||||||
| Cost of early debt retirement | — | — | (12,250 | ) | — | |||||||
| Net Income | 19,262 | 23,230 | 18,964 | 42,117 | ||||||||
| Income per common share, basic | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.49 | ||||||||
| Income per common share, diluted | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
| |
2003 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 80,054 | $ | 78,438 | $ | 82,575 | $ | 83,947 | |||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 21,524 | 24,978 | 26,682 | 26,430 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 25,914 | 21,444 | 21,153 | 24,187 | |||||||||
| Cost of early debt retirement | (1,855 | ) | (2,211 | ) | (19 | ) | (2,631 | ) | |||||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | 399 | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net Income | 7,990 | 4,170 | 6,669 | 7,288 | |||||||||
| Income per common share, basic | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.11 | |||||||||
| Income per common share, diluted | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.11 | |||||
IV-3
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. is well positioned over the next several years to continue its growth trajectory in reserves, production and its financial performance due principally to its large in-house inventory of drilling opportunities both onshore and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Magnum Hunter has a proved reserve base of 1.0 Tcfe predominantly located in the southwestern United States onshore, where annual production decline rates are typically less than other regions of the country. Magnum Hunter's management believes Magnum Hunter has over a five-year inventory of over 900 onshore development drilling locations and workover opportunities and 245 OCS Blocks in the Gulf of Mexico. This significant inventory of new drilling prospects enhances its capability in meeting its annual goal of replacing reserves and production in any given year.
Magnum Hunter's drilling success has continued to exceed 90% over the last four years. All of its 2004 growth in reserves and production was from a combination of drill bit growth and successful acquisitions. Magnum Hunter acquired 465 producing oil and gas wells from Encana Corporation during August 2004. The purchase also included approximately 44,000 net acres of undeveloped properties. The majority of these properties are located in Lea and Eddy counties of Southeast New Mexico. Magnum Hunter also acquired 170 producing wells in the Permian Basin of West Texas during October 2004. Magnum Hunter drilled a total of 175 wells in 2004 and completed 167 of them for an overall 95% success rate. Offshore drilling totals for the year included 33 of 39 offshore wells drilled successfully. Since Magnum Hunter's initial entry into the Gulf of Mexico in 1999, it has completed 111 of 134 wells, for an 83% overall rate of success.
Magnum Hunter's proved reserves increased from 838 Bcfe at the end of 2003 to 1.0 Tcfe at the end of 2004. Its proved reserves are predominantly long-life, stable, onshore reserves with 59% located in the Permian Basin region, 25% in the Mid-continent region, 8% on the Texas Gulf Coast and 8% from its offshore properties in the Gulf of Mexico. There has been a lot of discussion in the market, as well as at Magnum Hunter's board level, concerning the quality of proved reserves reported by publicly traded oil and gas companies. Fortunately, Magnum Hunter has been very pro-active in this area. Magnum Hunter believes its petroleum engineers have used a very conservative approach in booking proved reserves and therefore its risk in this area has been significantly mitigated. Magnum Hunter's management believes it has always used the most rigorous level of external reserve evaluation by DeGolyer & MacNaughton, referred to as D&M, and Cawley Gillespie, which are its third party engineering firms, and they evaluate 100% of Magnum Hunter's proved reserves.
Over the last several years, Magnum Hunter has continued a significant divestiture program of properties deemed to be more expensive to operate, environmentally sensitive, and having minimal, if any, upside exploration or development potential. Total proceeds received from this group of non-core assets sold over the last two years was $45.2 million, including the sale of Magnum Hunter's ownership interest in NGTS and TEL Offshore Trust. The net proceeds received from these assets sales have been used to reduce its overall indebtedness and to fund the capital expenditure program centered around activities in southeastern New Mexico and the Gulf of Mexico.
Magnum Hunter has been working over the last several years to continue a program of reducing overall indebtedness and improving its interest expense per Mcfe produced. Actions taken during 2004 to redeem a portion of its $300 million of outstanding High Yield Bonds that bear interest of 9.6% in combination with the new equity placement of $169.3 million of common stock. Additionally, Magnum Hunter's overall debt-to-book capitalization has continued to decrease from a high of 82% at December 31, 1999 to a current level of approximately 49%. It is the goal of Magnum Hunter management to reach a debt-to-capitalization level of 40% to 45% or better by year-end 2005.
IV-4
Magnum Hunter's capital expenditure budget for 2005 is currently estimated to be $250 million. While oil field service costs have continued to be at the lower end of previous cycles, it is beginning to see significant increases in certain sectors of the business such as oil field pipe and tubulars. Magnum Hunter anticipates experiencing price increases in other areas of the oil field. By operating the majority of its properties, it is in a unique position to better control the timing of its capital expenditure program and these expenses.
The Southeast New Mexico properties consist of approximately 1,110 wells in Chaves, Lea, and Eddy Counties, of which 71% are operated by Gruy. Several of the fields in Lea County produce from the Yates, Seven Rivers, Queen and other formations at depths generally shallower than 3,000 feet. The average net production for the Southeast New Mexico properties for December 2004 was 1,915 Bbl/d and 42,784 Mcf/d.
Magnum Hunter has been actively drilling increased density wells in the Morrow formation at approximately 11,500 feet. It participated in 34 Morrow wells in 2004 and has 23 operated wells planned for 2005. D&M has identified 93 proved undeveloped locations for the Morrow, with net reserves of 64.8 BCFe.
Several of the Morrow wells have identified proved developed non-producing areas in the Atoka and Strawn formations. The Encana acquisition that closed in 2004 greatly increased Magnum Hunter's upside potential in Southeast New Mexico.
Due to an unusual period within the energy industry wherein interest rates are low, oil field service costs are relatively low, and commodity prices for both oil and natural gas are at record highs, an opportunity for unforeseen expansion in Magnum Hunter's profit margins has occurred. Magnum Hunter does not anticipate any significant reductions in the price of crude oil and natural gas over the next several years due to tight supplies and increased demand here in North America and worldwide. Management of Magnum Hunter believes it is properly positioned during this period with its existing portfolio of assets and a significantly improved financial condition, to continue to report record financial results over the next several years.
Recent Announcement To Be Acquired by Cimarex Energy
On January 26, 2005, Magnum Hunter and Cimarex announced that their respective boards of directors had approved an agreement and plan of merger that provides for the acquisition of Magnum Hunter by Cimarex. Closing is anticipated before the end of the second quarter in 2005, subject to customary regulatory approvals.
Under the terms of the proposed agreement, Magnum Hunter shareholders will receive 0.415 shares of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock that they own. The merger is expected to be non-taxable to the shareholders of both companies. In addition to the merger consideration and prior to closing, Magnum Hunter intends to distribute its ownership interest in TEL Offshore Trust to its common stockholders as a special dividend.
Cimarex Energy Co., headquartered in Denver, CO, is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company with operations focused in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas of the U.S. Its principal operations offices are located in Tulsa, New Orleans and Houston.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Magnum Hunter's consolidated financial statements and the notes associated with them contained elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present
IV-5
assessment by management of Magnum Hunter. Throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus, there are statements that are classified as "forward-looking." Please refer to the "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" for an explanation of these types of assertions.
Magnum Hunter's results of operations are significantly affected by its ability to maintain or increase oil and natural gas production through exploration and exploitation activities. Fluctuations in oil and gas prices also significantly affect its results of operations.
Successful merger and acquisition activities also have a large impact on Magnum Hunter's results of operations by increasing proved reserves in its core areas which allows greater exploration and production potential paired with existing operation and production expertise in these areas.
On July 30, 2004, Magnum Hunter purchased oil and gas properties located in the state of New Mexico, primarily in Lea and Eddy counties for $239.1 million, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The properties include both proved producing oil and gas wells and proved undeveloped leasehold mineral interests. The effective date of the acquisition was May 1, 2004. Magnum Hunter purchased additional properties related to this acquisition during September 2004 for a purchase price of $1.4 million, net of certain purchase price adjustments. It also recorded additional asset retirement obligations of $1.5 million as a result of the acquisition. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to Magnum Hunter's historical results of operations.
On August 30, 2004, Magnum Hunter entered into an agreement to purchase approximately 170 producing wells located in the Permian Basin of West Texas for $40 million, net of certain purchase price adjustments. Closing occurred on October 29, 2004 and had an effective date of September 1, 2004. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to Magnum Hunter's historical results of operations.
On November 19, 2003, Magnum Hunter acquired an 80% controlling ownership interest in Metrix, an internet-based field marketing service company, through the settlement of outstanding litigation in its favor as well as the conversion of its $325 thousand loan to Metrix into equity of that company. As a result of the settlement, Magnum Hunter has fully consolidated Metrix, effective December 1, 2003. Prior to this acquisition, Magnum Hunter accounted for its approximate 32% ownership interest in Metrix as an equity investment. No goodwill was recorded on this acquisition. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to Magnum Hunter's historical results of operations.
On March 15, 2002, Magnum Hunter completed its merger with Prize Energy Corp., referred to as Prize, a publicly traded oil and gas production company engaged primarily in the acquisition, enhancement, and exploitation of producing oil and gas properties. For operating and financial reporting purposes, the effective date of the merger was March 1, 2002. As such, the results of operations for 2002 includes ten months of operating contributions from Prize. The transaction has been accounted for as a purchase of Prize by Magnum Hunter in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141. Under the terms of the merger, Magnum Hunter distributed 2.5 shares of common stock plus $5.20 in cash for each Prize share outstanding. The following summary, prepared on a pro forma basis, presents the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 as if the
IV-6
acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the year. The pro forma information includes the effects of adjustments for interest expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization, and income taxes:
| |
2002 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Unaudited) (in thousands, except for per share amounts) |
||||
| Revenue | $ | 292,872 | |||
| Total Operating Costs and Expenses | (219,575 | ) | |||
| Operating Profit | 73,297 | ||||
| Interest Expense and Other | (60,202 | ) | |||
| Income before Tax | 13,095 | ||||
| Benefit for Income Tax | 892 | ||||
| Net Income | $ | 13,987 | |||
| Net Income Per Common Share | |||||
| Basic | $ | 0.20 | |||
| Diluted | $ | 0.20 | |||
Subsequent to the Prize merger, Magnum Hunter sold non-strategic proved producing oil and gas reserves for total proceeds of approximately $136 million, net of purchase price adjustments. Substantially all of the properties sold were acquired in the Prize merger, and the proceeds have been used to reduce Magnum Hunter's overall indebtedness and fund its capital expenditure program. The impact of these non-strategic divestitures are described below in results of operations.
On July 29, 2003, Magnum Hunter exercised its option to sell its 30% interest in NGTS, LLC, referred to as NGTS. Magnum Hunter reduced the carrying value of its investment by approximately $791 thousand and recorded a charge to equity in earnings of affiliate in that amount to state its investment at its estimated fair value. The sale closed on September 30, 2003, and Magnum Hunter received proceeds of $5.2 million on that date, which were used to repay indebtedness. No gain or loss was recorded on the sale.
Magnum Hunter's results of operations have been significantly affected by its past success in acquiring oil and gas properties at or near the bottom of the commodity price cycles and its ability to maintain or increase oil and natural gas production through its exploration and exploitation activities. Fluctuations in oil and gas prices and commodity hedging activities have also significantly affected the results of operations.
IV-7
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Magnum Hunter's business segments:
| |
Years Ended |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| Exploration and Production Operations |
|||||||||||
| Production: | |||||||||||
| Oil (MBbls) | 4,080 | 3,893 | 3,875 | ||||||||
| Gas (MMcf) | 55,961 | 49,695 | 47,683 | ||||||||
| Oil and gas (MMcfe) | 80,442 | 73,052 | 70,933 | ||||||||
| Equivalent daily rate (MMcfe/day) | 219.8 | 200.1 | 194.3 | ||||||||
| Average sale prices (after hedging): | |||||||||||
| Oil (per Bbl) | $ | 34.27 | $ | 26.42 | $ | 24.04 | |||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | 5.41 | 3.66 | 3.10 | ||||||||
| Oil and gas (per Mcfe) | 5.50 | 3.90 | 3.40 | ||||||||
| Hedging losses (thousands) | (44,990 | ) | (73,833 | ) | (3,229 | ) | |||||
| Effect of hedging losses (per Mcfe) | (0.56 | ) | (1.01 | ) | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Lease operating expense (per Mcfe): | |||||||||||
| Lifting costs | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.72 | ||||||||
| Production tax and other costs | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.40 | ||||||||
| Gross margin (per Mcfe)(a) | 4.21 | 2.68 | 2.28 | ||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion (per Mcfe) | 1.54 | 1.32 | 1.17 | ||||||||
| Segment profit (thousands) | $ | 215,196 | $ | 99,809 | $ | 78,288 | |||||
Gas Gathering, Marketing and Processing Operations |
|||||||||||
| Throughput volumes (Mcf per day) | |||||||||||
| Gathering | 17,157 | 15,823 | 15,535 | ||||||||
| Processing | 25,639 | 24,947 | 22,811 | ||||||||
| Gross margin (in thousands)(a) | |||||||||||
| Gathering (per Mcf throughput) | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | |||||
| Processing (per Mcf throughput) | 1.21 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
| Segment profit (thousands) | $ | 10,425 | $ | 7,624 | $ | 3,643 | |||||
Oil Field Management Services |
|||||||||||
| Segment profit (thousands) | $ | 2,262 | $ | 1,045 | $ | 1,115 | |||||
- (a)
- Excludes depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion.
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
Magnum Hunter reported record net income of $103.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to net income of $26.1 million for the same period in 2003, an increase of 297%, reflecting solid performance growth in all of its business segments in 2004. Total operating revenues increased 52% to $493.7 million in 2004 from $325.0 million in 2003. A 41% increase in the price received for oil and gas sold (on a thousand cubic feet equivalent, or Mcfe, basis), combined with a 10% increase in oil and gas production (on a million cubic feet equivalent, or MMcfe, basis) in its exploration and production segment, as well as a 19% increase in revenues in its gas gathering, marketing and processing segment due to product price increases, and a 76% increase in oil field services revenues due to the acquisition of Metrix, were primarily responsible for the growth in
IV-8
revenues. Total operating costs and expenses increased 24% to $287.8 million in 2004 from $232.3 million in 2003, principally due to higher depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense, lease operating expense, gas gathering, marketing and processing expense, and general administrative expense. Operating profit increased 122% to $205.9 million in 2004 from $92.7 million in 2003, due primarily to a 116% increase in Magnum Hunter's exploration and production segment profit from $99.8 million in 2003 to $215.2 million in 2004, a 37% increase in its gas gathering, marketing and processing segment profit from $7.6 million in 2003 to $10.4 million in 2004, and a 116% increase in its oil field management services segment profit from $1 million in 2003 to $2.3 million in 2004. Income before income tax and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle increased 289% to $159.3 million in 2004 from $40.9 million in 2003, due to the growth in Magnum Hunter's business segment performance discussed in detail below. Magnum Hunter recorded income tax expense of $55.8 million for 2004 ($53.8 million deferred), versus an income tax expense of $15.2 million for 2003 ($15.5 million deferred), due to the growth in pre-tax income. The 2003 period includes a gain of $399 thousand, net of income tax, for the cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle due to the adoption of SFAS No. 143 relating to asset retirement obligations. Basic and diluted earnings per share in 2004 were $1.35 and $1.31 versus basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.39 in the 2003 period. Diluted shares outstanding increased 17% in the 2004 period compared to the 2003 period, primarily as a result of exercise of employee stock options and warrants, a secondary offering of 17.3 million shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, and the 49% increase in the average market price of Magnum Hunter common stock in 2004 compared to 2003. The 236% gain in diluted earnings per share in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily the result of the increase in net income.
Exploration and Production Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter reported oil production of 4.1 million barrels and natural gas production of 56 billion cubic feet, which represents a 5% increase in oil produced from the 3.9 million barrels reported in 2003, and a 13% increase in natural gas produced from the 49.7 billion cubic feet reported in 2003. Magnum Hunter's reported equivalent daily rate of production on a million cubic feet per day basis (MMcfe per day) increased 10% to 219.8 MMcfe per day in the 2004 period from 200.1 MMcfe per day in the 2003 period. These increases were primarily the result of the New Mexico and West Texas property acquisitions and the success of Magnum Hunter's drilling program offsetting both normal production declines and the effect of the sale of non-strategic oil and gas properties subsequent to the Prize merger. Approximately 2.7% of the production growth was from acquisitions and approximately 7.5% of the production growth was from its drilling program.
Oil revenues increased 36% to $139.8 million in the 2004 period compared to $102.8 million in the 2003 period. The oil price received, after hedging effects, was $34.27 per Bbl in the 2004 period compared to $26.42 per Bbl in the 2003 period, an increase of 30%. Gas revenues increased 67% to $302.9 million in the 2004 period versus $181.7 million in the 2003 period. The gas price received, after hedging effects, was $5.41 per Mcf in the 2004 period compared to $3.66 per Mcf for the same period in 2003, an increase of 48%. Total oil and gas sales increased 56% to $443.4 million in 2004 from $284.9 million in 2003, including the effect of hedging losses. Magnum Hunter reported a loss of $45 million from hedging activities in 2004 versus a loss of $73.8 million in 2003, a decrease of 39% due to the expiration of less favorably priced hedges in 2004. These losses are included in Magnum Hunter's reported oil and gas sales.
From time to time, Magnum Hunter enters into various commodity hedging contracts in order to reduce its exposure to the possibility of declining oil and gas prices which provide a basic level of cash flow to fund capital expenditures. During the 2004 period, hedging decreased the average price Magnum Hunter received for oil by $5.35 per Bbl and decreased the average price received for gas by $0.41 per Mcf. During the 2004 period, Magnum Hunter had approximately 86.7 Mmcf per day of gas
IV-9
hedged through cost-less collars with a weighted average floor price of $3.92 per Mmbtu and a weighted average ceiling price of $5.90 per Mmbtu. Approximately 57% of 2004 natural gas production was hedged. On the crude side, Magnum Hunter had approximately 5,865 Bbls per day hedged through cost-less collars with a weighted average floor price of $23.87 per Bbl and a weighted average ceiling price of $29.85 per Bbl. Approximately 53% of 2004 crude oil production was hedged.
Lease operating expense consists of lifting costs and production taxes and other costs. For the 2004 period, lifting costs were $60.9 million versus $56.3 million in the 2003 period, an increase of 8%. Production taxes and other costs were $43.7 million in the 2004 period versus $32.8 million in the 2003 period, an increase of 33%. The increase in lifting costs was primarily due to the property acquisitions and to Magnum Hunter's successful drilling program which increased the number of producing wells. The increase in production tax and other costs was primarily due to higher oil and gas prices and to higher volumes of oil and gas sold. For the 2004 period, lifting costs, on a unit of production basis, were $0.76 per Mcfe as compared to $0.77 per Mcfe in the 2003 period, a decrease of 1%. Production taxes and other costs were $0.54 per Mcfe in the 2004 period compared to $0.45 per Mcfe in the 2003 period, an increase of 20%. The increase in production taxes and other costs per Mcfe was caused by an increase in production taxes of $0.04 per Mcfe due to higher commodity prices received during the 2004 period, higher insurance costs of $0.02 per Mcfe, and higher overhead costs of $0.03 per Mcfe.
Magnum Hunter's gross margin realized from exploration and production operations (oil and gas revenues less lease operating expenses) for the 2004 period was $338.8 million, or $4.21 per Mcfe, compared to $195.9 million, or $2.68 per Mcfe in the 2003 period, an increase of 57% on a per unit of production basis. The gross margin increase is the result of a 41% increase in revenue per Mcfe produced, offset by a 7% increase in lease operating expense per Mcfe produced.
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion of oil and gas properties was approximately $123.6 million in the 2004 period versus approximately $96.1 million in the 2003 period. The 2004 period included accretion expense related to asset retirement obligations (due to the adoption in January 2003 of SFAS No. 143) of $2.9 million versus $2.5 million in 2003. On a unit of production basis, depreciation and depletion expense (excluding accretion expense) was $1.50 per Mcfe produced in the 2004 period versus $1.28 per Mcfe produced in the 2003 period. This 17% increase in the equivalent unit cost was due to the effect of Magnum Hunter's New Mexico property acquisition, an increase in development costs and shorter reserve life properties associated with activities in the Gulf of Mexico, and the transfer of $32.7 million of costs from unproved properties to the full cost pool. The costs which were transferred related to unproved property costs associated with properties which were sold or proved during 2004, as well as costs associated with leases which expired during the year. Accretion expense was $0.04 per Mcfe in 2004 versus $0.03 in 2003. Total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion for this segment was $1.54 per Mcfe in 2004 versus $1.32 per Mcfe in 2003.
Segment profit for exploration and production operations was $215.2 million for the 2004 period versus approximately $99.8 million for the 2003 period, an increase of 116%, due to property acquisitions, the success of Magnum Hunter's drilling program, and higher realized crude oil and natural gas prices.
Gathering, Marketing and Processing Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter's gathering system throughput was 17.2 MMcf per day versus 15.8 MMcf per day for the same period in 2003, an increase of 8% due to the construction and operation of two new gathering systems.
Gas processing throughput was 25.6 MMcf per day in 2004 versus 24.9 MMcf per day in 2003, an increase of 3% due to a combination of less downtime for unfavorable economics in 2004 and successful drilling behind the plants.
IV-10
Revenues from gathering, marketing and processing increased 19% to $41.9 million in 2004 versus $35.3 million in 2003, primarily due to higher realized prices for natural gas and natural gas liquids. Operating costs for this segment increased 15% to $29.1 million in 2004 from $25.4 million in 2003 due primarily to higher costs of gas purchased. The gross margin realized from gathering, marketing and processing for 2004 was $12.8 million versus $9.9 million in 2003, an increase of 29%. The gathering margin was $0.17 per Mcf gathered in 2004 versus $0.14 per Mcf in 2003 due to an increase in gathering fees and gas marketing margins. The processing margin was $1.21 per Mcf in 2004 compared to $0.99 per Mcf in 2003 due to more favorable processing economics.
Depreciation expense for gas gathering, marketing and processing operations was $2.4 million for the 2004 period versus $2.3 million for the 2003 period, an increase of 2% due to the new gathering systems.
Segment profit for gas gathering, marketing and processing operations was $10.4 million in the 2004 period versus $7.6 million for the 2003 period, an increase of 37%, due to higher gathering and processing throughput and improved processing economics at Magnum Hunter's natural gas processing plants.
Oil Field Management Services Operation
In December 2003 Magnum Hunter increased its equity ownership in Metrix to 80% and began to fully consolidate its results of operations with Magnum Hunter's oil field management services segment. The 2004 operating results for this segment contains twelve months of Metrix operations versus one month in 2003. Revenues from oil field management services were $8.4 million in the 2004 period versus $4.8 million in the 2003 period due to higher management and operations services fees charged to third parties. The higher fees were primarily due to a full year of consolidated operations of Metrix in 2004. Operating costs increased to $5.0 million in 2004 from $3.1 million in 2003 due to higher costs for labor and overhead and the inclusion of a full year of consolidated Metrix operations in 2004. The gross margin for this segment in 2004 increased to $3.4 million from $1.6 million in 2003, an increase of 106%, primarily due to Metrix.
Depreciation expense was $1.1 million in the 2004 period versus $604 thousand in the 2003 period, an increase of 88%, due to Metrix. Segment profit was $2.3 million in 2004 versus $1 million in 2003, an increase of 116%, due to Metrix.
Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion
Total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense was $127.2 million in the 2004 period versus $99.6 million in the 2003 period, an increase of 28%, primarily due to increased oil and gas production and increased depletion and accretion rates per unit produced in Magnum Hunter's exploration and production segment.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for 2004 increased 44% to $22.1 million from $15.3 million in 2003. The principal reasons for this increase were higher legal, accounting and other fees of $2.5 million, Metrix expenses (due to 12 months of Metrix consolidated in 2004 versus one month in 2003) of $2.1 million, and employee salaries and benefit costs of $2.2 million. The number of full-time employees at fiscal year-end 2004 and 2003 was 262 and 222, respectively. Fees and expenses, other than employee costs, associated with Sarbanes Oxley compliance were $1 million in 2004 versus $62 thousand in 2003.
IV-11
Other Income and Expenses
Magnum Hunter recorded a gain on sale of assets other than oil and gas properties of $288 thousand in 2004 versus $171 thousand in 2003.
Magnum Hunter recorded no equity in earnings of affiliate in 2004 versus equity in loss of affiliate of $162 thousand in 2003, principally due to the acquisition of 80% control of Metrix in December 2003. Other income was $2.6 million for 2004 versus $889 thousand in 2003, a 191% increase, due to a settlement of a lawsuit in favor of Magnum Hunter. Magnum Hunter recognized a $1.1 million gain in other non-cash hedging adjustments in 2004 versus a gain of $1.5 million in 2003. In the 2004 period, $792 thousand of the hedging gain relates to the amortization of commodity hedge liabilities acquired in the Prize merger, while $332 thousand of the gain was due to recording hedge ineffectiveness. In the 2003 period, $1.3 million of the hedging gain relates to the amortization of commodity hedge liabilities acquired in the Prize merger, while $186 thousand of the gain was due to recording hedge ineffectiveness.
Magnum Hunter incurred costs associated with early retirement of debt of $12.3 million in 2004 versus $6.7 million in 2003. The 2004 period debt retirement costs of were associated with the $105 million principal value redemption of its 9.6% Senior Notes at 109.6% of par. The 2003 period costs were associated with the $30 million, $50 million, and $60 million redemptions in principal value of Magnum Hunter's 10% Senior Notes at 105% of par, 103.333% of par, and 103.333% of par in January, June and December 2003, respectively, as well as a subsidiary's August 2003 purchase of $381 thousand in principal value of its 10% Senior Notes at 103.75% of par. Of the $140 million in principal value of 10% Senior Notes redeemed in 2003, a subsidiary received $10.9 million in principal value.
Interest expense was $38.1 million for 2004 versus $47.3 million for 2003, a decrease of 19%, primarily the result of interest saved on the early redemption of Magnum Hunter's 10% and 9.6% Senior Notes and lower interest rate hedging costs. During the 2004 period, the average interest rate on Magnum Hunter's Senior Credit Facility, referred to as the Facility, was 3.54% versus 3.4% in 2003, an increase of 4%. The weighted average daily balance of the Facility increased 2% to $217.8 million in 2004 from $213.7 million in 2003. In addition, Magnum Hunter incurred no interest rate hedge expense in the 2004 period versus $961 thousand in the 2003 period. The interest rate hedge expired in August 2003.
Magnum Hunter recorded income tax expense of $55.8 million in 2004 ($53.8 million of which was deferred), versus an income tax expense of $15.2 million in 2003 ($15.5 million of which was deferred). The variance in the effective tax rate from the statutory rate of 35% in 2004 was primarily due to state income taxes. Magnum Hunter reduced its blended state income tax rate from 2.875% to 1.2% due to a change in estimate of the amount of income from its offshore properties and properties held by a limited partnership which are not subject to state income taxes. This change in estimate, when applied to its deferred state income tax liability, resulted in a reduction of deferred state income tax expense of $4.8 million in 2004. Magnum Hunter also increased its valuation allowance for utilization of its state net operating loss carryforwards, resulting in additional state tax expense of $2 million in 2004.
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
Magnum Hunter reported net income of $26.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to net income of $15.5 million for the same period in 2002, an increase of 68%, reflecting the solid performance of both its exploration and production segment and its gathering, marketing and processing segment. Total operating revenues increased 22% to $325.0 million in 2003 from $265.9 million in 2002. A 15% increase in the price received for oil and gas sold (on a thousand cubic feet equivalent, or Mcfe, basis), combined with a 3% increase in oil and gas production (on a million cubic feet equivalent, or MMcfe, basis) in its exploration and production segment, as well as a 70%
IV-12
increase in revenues in its gas gathering, marketing and processing segment due to the Prize merger and product price increases, were primarily responsible for the improvement in revenues. The production increase in Magnum Hunter's exploration and production segment was impacted by the merger with Prize, the success of its drilling program, and the sale of non-strategic oil and gas properties. Total operating costs and expenses increased 18% to $232.3 million in 2003 from $197.0 million in 2002, principally due to higher depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense, lease operating expense, gas gathering, marketing and processing expense, and general administrative expense due to the merger with Prize. Operating profit increased 35% to $92.7 million in 2003 from $68.9 million in 2002, due primarily to a 27% increase in its exploration and production segment profit from $78.3 million in 2002 to $99.8 million in 2003 and a 109% increase in its gas gathering, marketing and processing segment profit from $3.6 million in 2002 to $7.6 million in 2003. Segment profit for Magnum Hunter's oil field management service segment declined approximately 6% from $1.1 million in 2002 to $1 million in 2003 due to higher depreciation expense. Net income before income tax and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle increased 194% to $40.9 million in 2003 from $13.9 million in 2002, primarily due to the Prize merger and the increase in crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids prices in the 2003 period compared to the 2002 period. Additionally, the 2003 period included costs associated with early retirement of debt of $6.7 million from the redemption of its 10% Senior Notes, discussed in further detail below in "—Other Income and Expenses." Magnum Hunter recorded income tax expense of $15.2 million for 2003, of which $15.5 million was deferred tax expense, versus a deferred tax benefit of $1.6 million for 2002. The 2002 period income tax benefit resulted from the elimination of the $7.1 million valuation allowance that had been carried against deferred tax assets derived from net operating loss carryovers generated by Magnum Hunter in prior years. As a result of the Prize merger, Magnum Hunter believes that this tax asset can be fully realized. Additionally, the 2003 period includes the cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle due to the adoption of SFAS No. 143 relating to asset retirement obligations. The cumulative effect was a gain of $399 thousand, net of income tax expense of $244 thousand, or $0.01 per share, both basic and diluted. Basic and diluted earnings per share in 2003 were $0.39 versus basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.25 in the 2002 period. Basic and diluted shares outstanding increased 8% in the 2003 period compared to the 2002 period, primarily as a result of new shares issued in the Prize merger. The 56% gain in diluted earnings per share in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily the result of the increase in net income.
Exploration and Production Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2003, Magnum Hunter reported oil production of approximately 3.9 million barrels and natural gas production of approximately 49.7 billion cubic feet, which represents no change in oil produced and an increase of 4% in natural gas produced from the 47.7 billion cubic feet reported in the 2002 period. Magnum Hunter's reported equivalent daily rate of production on a million cubic feet per day basis (MMcfe per day) increased 3% to 200.1 MMcfe per day in the 2003 period from 194.3 MMcfe per day in the 2002 period. These increases were primarily the result of the Prize merger and the success of its drilling program offsetting both normal production declines and the effect of the sale of non-strategic oil and gas properties subsequent to the Prize merger. The impact of these non-strategic property sales on reported production was a decrease of 27.1 Mmcfe per day in the 2003 period compared to the 2002 period. Removing the effect of sold properties from both the 2003 and 2002 periods, Magnum Hunter's daily equivalent production grew 15.9% from 2002 to 2003.
Oil revenues increased 10% to $102.8 million in the 2003 period compared to $93.2 million in the 2002 period. The oil price received, after hedging effects, was $26.42 per Bbl in the 2003 period compared to $24.04 per Bbl in the 2002 period, an increase of 10%. Gas revenues increased 23% to $181.7 million in the 2003 period versus $147.8 million in the 2002 period. The gas price received, after hedging effects, was $3.66 per Mcf in the 2003 period compared to $3.10 per Mcf for the same period in 2002, an increase of 18%. Magnum Hunter also recorded $398 thousand in oil and gas sales in the
IV-13
2003 period from business interruption insurance proceeds resulting from claims filed in 2002 due to Hurricane Lili. Total oil and gas sales increased 18% to $284.9 million in 2003 from $241 million in 2002.
From time to time, Magnum Hunter enters into various commodity hedging contracts in order to reduce its exposure to the possibility of declining oil and gas prices which provide a basic level of cash flow to fund capital expenditures. During the 2003 period, hedging decreased the average price Magnum Hunter received for oil by $3.20 per Bbl and decreased the average price received for gas by $1.23 per Mcf. During the 2003 period, Magnum Hunter had approximately 35.0 Mmcf per day of gas hedged through fixed price swaps with a weighted average price of $3.10 per Mmbtu and approximately 55.0 Mmcf per day of gas hedged through cost-less collars with a weighted average floor price of $2.91 per Mmbtu and a weighted average ceiling price of $3.97 per Mmbtu. Approximately 60% of 2003 natural gas production was hedged. On the crude side, Magnum Hunter had approximately 1,000 Bbls per day hedged through fixed price swaps with a weighted average price of $21.25 per barrel and approximately 6,000 Bbls per day hedged through cost-less collars with a weighted average floor price of $23.00 per Bbl and a weighted average ceiling price of $27.00 per Bbl. Approximately 66% of 2003 crude oil production was hedged.
Lease operating expense consists of lifting costs and production taxes and other costs. For the 2003 period, lifting costs were $56.3 million versus $51.6 million in the 2002 period, an increase of 9%. Production taxes and other costs were $32.8 million in the 2003 period versus $28.2 million in the 2002 period, an increase of 16%. Both increases were primarily attributable to the Prize merger. For the 2003 period, lifting costs, on a unit of production basis, were $0.77 per Mcfe as compared to $0.72 per Mcfe in the 2002 period, an increase of 7%. The increase in lifting costs per Mcfe produced in the 2003 period was due to higher power and fuel costs and increased remedial and workover expense. The increased workover expense is due to remedial work on older properties acquired in the Prize merger as well as discretionary workovers done to enhance current production. Production taxes and other costs were $0.45 per Mcfe produced in the 2003 period compared to $0.40 per Mcfe produced in the 2002 period, an increase of 13%. The increase in production taxes per Mcfe produced was caused by an increase in crude oil and natural gas prices received during the 2003 period.
Magnum Hunter's gross margin realized from exploration and production operations (oil and gas revenues less lease operating expenses) for the 2003 period was $195.9 million, or $2.68 per Mcfe, compared to $161.2 million, or $2.28 per Mcfe in the 2002 period, an increase of 18% on a per unit of production basis. The gross margin increase is the result of a 15% increase in revenue per Mcfe produced, offset by a 9% increase in lease operating expense per Mcfe produced.
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion of oil and gas properties was $96.1 million in the 2003 period versus $83 million in the 2002 period. The 2003 period included accretion expense related to asset retirement obligations (due to the adoption in January 2003 of SFAS No. 143) of $2.5 million versus none in 2002. On a unit of production basis, depreciation and depletion expense (excluding accretion expense) was $1.28 per Mcfe produced in the 2003 period versus $1.17 per Mcfe produced in the 2002 period. This 10% increase in the equivalent unit cost was due primarily to an increase in development costs and shorter reserve life properties associated with activities in the Gulf of Mexico as well as the transfer of $75.0 million of costs from unproved properties to the full cost pool. The costs which were transferred related to unproved property costs associated with properties which were sold or proved during 2003, as well as costs associated with leases which expired during the year. Accretion expense was $0.03 per Mcfe in 2003 versus none in 2002. Total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion for this segment was $1.32 per Mcfe in 2003 versus $1.17 per Mcfe in 2002.
Segment profit for exploration and production operations was $99.8 million for the 2003 period versus $78.3 million for the 2002 period, an increase of 27%, principally due to properties acquired in
IV-14
the Prize merger, the success of Magnum Hunter's drilling program, and higher realized crude oil and natural gas prices.
Gathering, Marketing and Processing Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2003, Magnum Hunter's gathering system throughput was 15.8 MMcf per day versus 15.5 MMcf per day for the same period in 2002, an increase of 2% due to successful drilling behind the system. Gas processing throughput was 24.9 MMcf per day in 2003 versus 22.8 MMcf per day in 2002, an increase of 9%, due primarily to the effect of the Prize merger.
Revenues from gathering, marketing and processing increased 70% to $35.3 million in 2003 versus $20.8 million in 2002, primarily due to higher realized prices for natural gas and natural gas liquids. The gross margin realized from gathering, marketing and processing for 2003 was $9.9 million versus $5.7 million in 2002, an increase of 74%. The gathering margin was $0.14 per Mcf gathered in 2003 versus $0.13 per Mcf in 2002 due to an increase in gathering fees. The processing margin was $0.99 per Mcf in 2003 compared to $0.55 per Mcf in 2002 due to more favorable processing economics.
Depreciation expense for gas gathering, marketing and processing operations was $2.3 million for the 2003 period versus $2.1 million for the 2002 period, due to the Prize merger.
Segment profit for gas gathering, marketing and processing operations was $7.6 million in the 2003 period versus $3.6 million for the 2002 period, an increase of 109%, principally due to higher throughput and improved processing economics at Magnum Hunter's natural gas processing plants.
Oil Field Management Services Operations
Revenues from oil field management services were $4.8 million in the 2003 period versus $4.1 million in the 2002 period due to higher management and operations services fees charged to third parties. Operating costs increased to $3.1 million in 2003 from $2.5 million in 2002 due to higher costs for labor and overhead. The gross margin for this segment in 2003 compared to 2002 was unchanged at $1.6 million.
Depreciation expense was $604 thousand in the 2003 period versus $507 thousand in the 2002 period, an increase of 19%, due to capital additions. Segment profit was $1 million in 2003 versus $1.1 million in 2002, a decrease of 6%, due to the increase in depreciation expense.
Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion
Total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense was $99.6 million in the 2003 period versus $86.5 million in the 2002 period, an increase of 15%, primarily as a result of increased production and increased depletion and accretion rates in Magnum Hunter's exploration and production segment.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for 2003 increased 15% to $15.3 million from $13.3 million in 2002. The principal reason for this increase was the $3.0 million cost of expensing employee stock options recorded in the 2003 period as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123 in June 2003, with an effective date of January 1, 2003. The number of full-time employees at fiscal year-end 2003 and 2002 was 222 and 221 respectively.
Other Income and Expenses
Magnum Hunter recorded a gain on sale of assets other than oil and gas properties of $171 thousand in 2003 versus $61 thousand in 2002. Magnum Hunter recorded equity in loss of affiliate
IV-15
of $162 thousand in 2003 versus equity in earnings of affiliate of $792 thousand in 2002, principally due to the reduction of the carrying value of its investment in NGTS by $791 thousand to state it at its estimated fair value prior to sale, as well as its equity in losses generated by Metrix prior to Magnum Hunter's acquisition of 80% control of Metrix in December 2003. Other income was $889 thousand for 2003 versus $452 thousand in 2002, a 97% increase, due to an increase in interest income. In 2002, Magnum Hunter recorded an impairment of $621 thousand on an investment in a company that declared bankruptcy. Magnum Hunter recognized a $1.5 million gain in other non-cash hedging adjustments in 2003 versus a loss of $6.6 million in 2002. In the 2003 period, $1.3 million of the hedging gain relates to the amortization of commodity hedge liabilities acquired in the Prize merger, while $186 thousand of the gain was due to recording hedge ineffectiveness. In the 2002 period, a loss of $6.1 million relates to the amortization of commodity hedge assets acquired in the Prize merger, and a loss of $500 thousand was due to recording hedge ineffectiveness.
Magnum Hunter incurred costs associated with early retirement of debt of $6.7 million in 2003 versus $1 million in 2002. The 2003 period costs were associated with the $30 million, $50 million, and $60 million redemptions in principal value of its 10% Senior Notes at 105% of par, 103.333% of par, and 103.333% of par in January, June and December 2003, respectively, as well as a subsidiary's August 2003 purchase of $381 thousand in principal value of Magnum Hunter's 10% Senior Notes at 103.75% of par. Of the $140 million in principal value of 10% Senior Notes redeemed in 2003, a subsidiary received $10.9 million in principal value. The 2002 period debt retirement costs of $1 million were associated with the amendment of the Facility in connection with the Prize merger.
Interest expense was $47.3 million for 2003 versus $47.9 million for 2002, a decrease of 1%, primarily as a result of lower interest rates on the Facility, lower interest rate hedging costs, and interest saved on the early redemption of Magnum Hunter's 10% Senior Notes. During the 2003 period, the average interest rate on the Facility was 3.4% versus 4.0% in 2002, a decline of 15%. The weighted average daily balance of the Facility increased 17% to $213.7 million in 2003 from $182.9 million in 2002. By December 31, 2003, the level of the Facility had been reduced to $165 million through sales of non-strategic oil and gas properties and the issuance in December 2003 of $125 million of floating rate convertible senior notes, referred to as Convertible Notes, which have a floating interest rate based on three-month LIBOR (initially set at 1.17%). In addition, Magnum Hunter incurred interest rate hedge expense of $961 thousand in the 2003 period versus $1.2 million in the 2002 period. The interest rate hedge expired in August 2003.
Magnum Hunter recorded income tax expense of $15.2 million in 2003 ($15.5 million of which was deferred), versus a deferred income tax benefit of $1.6 million in 2002. The 2002 period benefited from the release of the $7.1 million valuation allowance on previously reserved deferred tax assets as a result of the increased likelihood (due to the Prize merger) that the tax assets generated from prior net operating losses will be realized in the future. The 2002 period was also impacted by a $2.3 million deferred tax provision from the adjustment of goodwill due to sales of non-strategic oil and gas properties. The effective tax rate for 2003 and 2002 was 37.2% and (11.4%), respectively. The variance in the effective tax rate from the statutory rate of 35% was due to state income taxes in the 2003 period and the release of the valuation allowance on Magnum Hunter's previously reserved deferred tax assets in the 2002 period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Magnum Hunter's liquidity is primarily dependent upon its ability to generate cash flow from operations and from external sources such as commercial banks or the bond market. One of the most significant items that can impact Magnum Hunter's internally generated funds and availability under the Facility is commodity prices. Should oil and gas prices decline significantly, Magnum Hunter's cash flow would be negatively impacted. If commodity prices declined and were perceived by its lenders to be more than temporary, the amount available under the Facility would be reduced. Reductions in
IV-16
Magnum Hunter's borrowing capacity could cause it to have to pay down its bank debt, reduce its drilling activities and possibly sell oil and gas properties.
Increases in interest rates could also negatively impact Magnum Hunter's liquidity, as more cash flow would have to be directed toward the payment of interest. Because Magnum Hunter is leveraged, interest expense is a significant financial obligation.
Magnum Hunter attempts to mitigate the impact of decreases in commodity prices and increases in interest rates by the use of hedging contracts; however, it does not hedge all of its commodity price or interest rate risks. Instead, Magnum Hunter management judges the likelihood of changes in commodity prices and interest rates and considers other factors such as the amount of debt and estimated cash flow under various scenarios. Hedges are then considered and entered into as deemed appropriate.
CASH FLOW AND WORKING CAPITAL. Net cash provided by operating activities was $300.6 million, $162.6 million, and $83.4 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Magnum Hunter's operating cash flow for 2004 increased over that for 2003, primarily due to substantially higher operating profits realized by its business segments when adjusted for non-cash items. Please see the period to period comparisons for further explanations on the causes and amounts of the increases in its earnings. In the 2004 period, Magnum Hunter made income tax payments (net of current year refunds) of $2.4 million.
Magnum Hunter's net working capital position at December 31, 2004 was a deficit of $5.2 million. At this date, it had $202.5 million available under the Facility. A large factor in Magnum Hunter's negative working capital was $14.0 million in current derivative liabilities it had recorded on its 2005 hedging program due to continued increases in commodities prices over its hedged prices. This liability is partially offset by $5.0 million in deferred tax assets which will be released as its 2005 hedges are settled. If actual commodities prices realized on its production remain higher than its hedged prices, Magnum Hunter's resulting higher proceeds from oil and gas sales will offset any actual amounts paid out on this liability.
Magnum Hunter's 2003 operating cash flow was higher than its 2002 operating cash flow also due to higher profits realized by its business segments when adjusted for non-cash items. Please refer to the period to period comparisons for further explanations on the causes and amounts of the increases in earnings. Magnum Hunter also benefited from $8.1 million in refunds (net of 2003 payments) as well as the return of $6.5 million in margin deposits it had posted on commodity hedge positions.
Magnum Hunter's net working capital position at December 31, 2003 was also a deficit of $5.2 million. At this date it had $87.5 million available under the Facility. Again, a large factor in its negative working capital was $21.9 million in current derivative liabilities it had recorded on its 2004 hedging program due to continued increases in commodities prices over its hedged prices for 2004 production. The amounts paid out on these liabilities were offset by higher cash received for the related production in 2004. This liability was also offset by $8.3 million of current deferred tax assets which were released as the positions were settled.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES. Net cash used in investing activities was $513.9 million, $159.7 million, and $89.4 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. During July 2004, Magnum Hunter paid $234.2 million, net of certain purchase price adjustments, for its acquisition of New Mexico properties. In 2004, the main source of its investing was $303.1 million spent for capital expenditures which are discussed in the section immediately following the liquidity and capital resources discussions. During 2004, Magnum Hunter also received $22.9 million from the sales of non-strategic oil and gas properties.
In 2003, the main source of Magnum Hunter's investing was $175.5 million spent for capital expenditures. During 2003, Magnum Hunter also received $17.1 million from the sales of non-strategic
IV-17
oil and gas properties as well as $5.2 million from the sale of its 30% interest in NGTS. Magnum Hunter spent $6.1 million to purchase land which it currently has available for sale and $1.5 million to purchase land to be held for geothermal development.
During 2002, Magnum Hunter spent $141.0 million on capital expenditures as well as $41.1 million to complete the Prize merger. These expenditures were partially offset by $96.0 million received on sales of non-strategic oil and gas properties acquired in the Prize merger.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES. Net cash provided by financing activities was $215 million, $12.7 million, and $6.3 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. During 2004, Magnum Hunter received $169.3 million from the issuance of common stock pursuant to its secondary offering of common stock. Magnum Hunter also received $10.4 million from the issuance of stock pursuant to its employee stock option plans. Magnum Hunter loaned $2.3 million to its KSOP to purchase approximately 225 thousand shares of its common stock to be available for purchase by participants at future dates. KSOP participants paid Magnum Hunter $807 thousand to purchase approximately 134 thousand unallocated KSOP shares of its common stock and Magnum Hunter forgave KSOP debt of $1.3 million by contributing approximately 223 thousand unallocated shares of its common stock to participants as its 2004 employer retirement plan contribution. At December 31, 2004, the KSOP had a loan balance of $6.2 million. This loan carries no interest and is due December 31, 2005. Magnum Hunter paid $115.1 million to redeem $105 million in principal of its 9.6% Senior Notes at 109.6% of par, borrowed approximately $466 million under the Facility, and made repayments on its debt of $313 million. Magnum Hunter also paid fees related to its financing activities of $1.0 million.
During 2003, Magnum Hunter received $4.7 million from the issuance of common stock and treasury stock pursuant to employee stock option and warrant exercises, and paid down debt of $486.3 million. Magnum Hunter paid $134.4 million to redeem the outstanding $129.5 million in principal of its 10% Senior Notes and borrowed approximately $517.4 million under the Facility. Magnum Hunter also received $125 million from the issuance of Convertible Notes and paid fees related to financing activities of $4.4 million. During 2003, Magnum Hunter also spent $7.4 million to repurchase approximately 1.3 million shares of its common stock. Magnum Hunter loaned $2.7 million to its KSOP to purchase approximately 486 thousand shares of its common stock and forgave KSOP debt of $1.1 million by contributing approximately 172 thousand shares of its common stock to participants. KSOP participants paid Magnum Hunter $380 thousand to purchase approximately 59 thousand unallocated shares of its common stock.
During 2002, Magnum Hunter received $300 million from the issuance of its 9.6% Senior Notes due 2012 and paid down debt of $30 million. Magnum Hunter paid off $246.8 million of long-term debt acquired in the Prize merger. During 2002, Magnum Hunter also spent $18.0 million to repurchase approximately 2.7 million shares of its common stock. Magnum Hunter loaned $3.7 million to its KSOP to purchase approximately 532 thousand shares of its common stock and forgave KSOP debt of $1.3 million by releasing approximately 244 thousand shares of its common stock to participants. Magnum Hunter also received $3.6 million from the exercise of employee stock options.
CAPITAL RESOURCES. Cash flow from operations and borrowings under the Facility are its major sources of liquidity. From time to time, it may also sell investments and oil and gas properties to increase its liquidity. In addition, Magnum Hunter also may use other sources of capital, such as issuances of additional debt or equity securities to fund acquisitions or other specific needs. In the past, Magnum Hunter has accessed both public and private capital markets to obtain capital for specific activities as well as general corporate purposes. Magnum Hunter currently has $23.2 million available remaining under its current shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On May 1, 2002, Magnum Hunter's Board of Directors announced an expansion of its existing stock repurchase program originally established in June 2001. Under the program, Magnum Hunter or its affiliates are authorized to repurchase up to two million shares of Magnum Hunter common stock.
IV-18
On October 17, 2002, Magnum Hunter's Board of Directors approved a new three million share repurchase program. Approximately 4.2 million shares have been repurchased through these programs, and approximately 818 thousand remain available for repurchase.
On December 5, 2001, Magnum Hunter announced a distribution of one warrant for every five shares of its common stock owned on January 10, 2002. These warrants were distributed on March 21, 2002. Each new warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $15. The warrants will expire three years from the date of distribution unless extended by the Board of Directors.
On January 15, 2002, Magnum Hunter entered into a sale-leaseback transaction on three newly constructed offshore production platforms and associated pipelines. Magnum Hunter received a total of $11.2 million in new funding which was used for general corporate purposes, including a voluntary reduction under the Facility. The production platforms are being leased from a syndicate group of lenders over a term of three to five years at a cost of funds based on LIBOR, yielding a weighted average rate of 5.58% per annum at December 31, 2004. This transaction was accounted for as a capital lease.
On March 15, 2002, Magnum Hunter amended and restated the Facility in conjunction with the merger with Prize. The amended Facility provided for total borrowings of $500 million, up from $225 million, and raised the borrowing base limit from $160 million to $300 million. Additionally, Magnum Hunter amended and extended the expiration date of the Facility to March 2005. After March 15, 2002, the Facility was used i) to fund the cash component of the Prize merger, ii) to pay certain costs associated with the merger, and iii) for general corporate purposes. In connection with certain oil and gas property divestitures, the borrowing base was reduced to $250 million on September 3, 2002.
During 2003, Magnum Hunter amended the Facility in May and October to ultimately increase the borrowing base to $350 million, up $100 million from its previous $250 million borrowing base. Magnum Hunter also extended the expiration date of the Facility to May 2, 2006. The increased borrowing base was used to fund the redemptions of its 10% Senior Notes which were completed prior to the issuance of its Convertible Notes in December 2003. Magnum Hunter also used the increased borrowing base to fund the costs of issuing its Convertible Notes. Upon the issuance of its Convertible Notes, Magnum Hunter repaid approximately $144 million of its borrowings on this Facility, and the borrowing base was reduced $95 million to $255 million.
On April 30, 2004, Magnum Hunter amended the Facility to receive a more favorable rate structure and to increase the borrowing base to $275 million. Magnum Hunter also extended the maturity date by one year, resulting in a new maturity date of May 2, 2007. On July 15, 2004, Magnum Hunter amended the Facility again to increase the borrowing base to $480 million upon the consummation of its New Mexico property acquisition, an increase of $205 million, and to allow it to use proceeds from its secondary common stock offering to redeem and retire up to $105 million in principal value of its 9.6% Senior Notes at 109.6% of par. On October 18, 2004, Magnum Hunter amended the Facility to increase the borrowing base by $45 million, from $480 million to $525 million and to increase its maximum borrowings from $500 million to $750 million. The level of the borrowing base is dependent on the valuation by the lenders of the assets pledged, primarily oil and gas reserves. At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had $202.5 million of available credit under the Facility.
The Facility includes covenants, the most restrictive of which requires maintenance of a funded debt to EBITDA ratio and an interest coverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement. Magnum Hunter was not in compliance with the funded debt to EBITDA ratio required under the covenants at March 31, 2002. The lender provided it with a waiver as of that date, and it negotiated a less restrictive funded debt to EBITDA ratio for the next four successive quarters until March 31, 2003. Magnum Hunter was in compliance with the covenants for the remainder of 2002 and has been in compliance
IV-19
with the revised covenants for all of 2003 and 2004. Magnum Hunter expects to be able to comply with these covenants in the future.
On a semi-annual basis, Magnum Hunter's borrowing base under the Facility is redetermined by the financial institutions who have committed to it based on their review of its proved oil and gas reserves and other assets. If the outstanding balance on the Facility exceeds the redetermined borrowing base, Magnum Hunter must repay the excess over a six-month period. The last redetermination date had an effective date of June 30, 2004 and was completed on October 15, 2004. This redetermination increased Magnum Hunter's borrowing base by $45 million up to $525 million, and the maximum borrowings were increased from $500 million to $750 million. Magnum Hunter's next redetermination date will have an effective date of December 31, 2004 and will have a completion date of no later than May 9, 2005.
On March 15, 2002, Magnum Hunter completed a private placement of $300 million of Senior Notes, referred to as the Private Placement, due 2012 that are unsecured. The Senior Notes bear an annual interest rate of 9.6% due semi-annually, commencing September 15, 2002. Magnum Hunter redeemed $105 million in principal of these notes on August 27, 2004 at a redemption price of 109.6% of par. Magnum Hunter paid the holders of these redeemed notes $115.1 million plus accrued and unpaid interest of $4.5 million. Magnum Hunter recorded $12.3 million in costs associated with this redemption comprised of $10.1 million in premiums and $2.2 million in unamortized deferred financing fees that were written off.
With the funds provided by the new Facility in 2002 and the Private Placement of the 9.6% Senior Notes, Magnum Hunter repaid indebtedness on its old Facility of $155.7 million, retired the long-term debt acquired in the Prize merger for $246.8 million, funded the cash component of the merger for $70.9 million ($41.1 million net of cash acquired), and paid approximately $12.2 million for fees and expenses related to the merger. In connection with the Prize merger, Magnum Hunter issued 34,062,963 shares of its common stock to Prize shareholders, increasing its total shares outstanding by 96%.
During 2003, Magnum Hunter paid $145.2 million to redeem the $140 million in principal of its 10% Senior Notes. This redemption was funded by borrowings under the Facility as well as the issuance of $125 million in Convertible Notes during December 2003. Magnum Hunter paid approximately $5.2 million in premiums to redeem the 10% Senior Notes. Of the notes redeemed, a subsidiary received approximately $10.9 million in principal and received premiums of approximately $273 thousand.
During December of 2003, Magnum Hunter issued $125 million in face value of Convertible Notes. These Convertible Notes bear interest equal to the three-month LIBOR, to be adjusted quarterly. The initial rate set on issuance of the Convertible Notes was 1.17%, and the current rate is 2.49%. The Convertible Notes are convertible into a combination of cash and Magnum Hunter common stock upon certain events. The initial conversion price is $12.19, subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The Convertible Notes are due December 2023, but can be put by the holders on December 15, 2008, 2013, and 2018. Magnum Hunter has the right to call these Convertible Notes at any time after December 22, 2008. The proceeds from these Convertible Notes were used to repay borrowings under the Facility.
Holders may surrender Convertible Notes for conversion into cash and shares of Magnum Hunter common stock prior to the Convertible Notes' maturity date in the following circumstances: i) during any calendar quarter commencing after the issuance of the Convertible Notes, if Magnum Hunter's common stock price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the calendar quarter preceding the quarter in which the conversion occurs is more than 110% of the conversion price per share of its common stock in effect on that 30th trading day; ii) if Magnum Hunter has called the particular Convertible Notes for redemption and the
IV-20
redemption has not yet occurred; iii) during the five trading day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes for each day of such five-day period was less than 95% of the product of the closing sale price of Magnum Hunter common stock on that day multiplied by 82.0345, referred to as the Conversion Rate; or iv) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.
Upon the occurrence of the circumstances described above, holders may convert any outstanding notes into cash and shares of Magnum Hunter common stock at an initial conversion price per share of $12.19. Subject to certain exceptions, at the time notes are tendered for conversion, the value, referred to as the Conversion Value, of the cash and shares of Magnum Hunter common stock, if any, to be received by a holder converting $1,000 principal amount of the notes will be determined by multiplying the Conversion Rate by the ten-day average closing stock price of Magnum Hunter common stock. Magnum Hunter will deliver the Conversion Value to holders as follows: i) an amount in cash, referred to as the Principal Return, equal to the lesser of (a) the Conversion Value and (b) the principal amount of the notes to be converted and, if the Conversion Value is greater than the Principal Return, ii) an amount in shares equal to the Conversion Value less the Principal Return, referred to as the Net Share Amount. The number of Net Shares to be paid will be determined by dividing the Net Share Amount by the ten day average closing stock price of Magnum Hunter common stock.
Metrix has a $500 thousand revolving credit facility with a lender. This facility matures on December 16, 2005 and is governed by a borrowing base. Magnum Hunter is a guarantor to this facility. As of December 31, 2004, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.
Magnum Hunter's internally generated cash flows, results of operations, and financing of its operations are substantially dependent on oil and gas prices. To the extent that oil and gas prices decline, its earnings and cash flows may be adversely affected regardless of its commodity hedging programs. Magnum Hunter believes that its cash flows from operations, existing working capital, and availability under the Facility will be sufficient to meet interest payments and fund capital expenditures during 2005.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. For the year ended December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter's total capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment, were $540 million. The following summarizes its capital expenditures by cost component (in thousands):
| |
Oil and Gas Properties |
Other Property |
Total |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition costs: | |||||||
| Unproved acquisitions | 19,515 | — | 19,515 | ||||
| Proved acquisitions | 297,957 | — | 297,957 | ||||
| Other property acquisitions | — | 3,311 | 3,311 | ||||
| Development costs | 166,484 | — | 166,484 | ||||
| Exploratory costs | 52,743 | — | 52,743 | ||||
| Total | 536,699 | 3,311 | 540,010 | ||||
For the year 2005, Magnum Hunter has budgeted approximately $250 million for exploration and development activities. Magnum Hunter anticipates that the 2005 capital expenditure budget will be funded by cash flow from operations and Facility utilization. Magnum Hunter is not contractually obligated to proceed with any of its material budgeted capital expenditures. The amount and allocation of future capital expenditures will depend on a number of factors that are not entirely within its control or ability to forecast, including drilling results, oilfield costs, and changes in oil and gas prices. As a result, actual capital expenditures may vary significantly from current expectations.
IV-21
In the normal course of business, Magnum Hunter reviews opportunities for the possible acquisition of oil and gas reserves and activities related thereto. When potential acquisition opportunities are deemed consistent with its growth strategy, bids or offers in amounts and with terms acceptable to Magnum Hunter may be submitted. It is uncertain whether any such bids or offers which Magnum Hunter may submit from time to time, will be acceptable to the sellers. In the event of a future significant acquisition, Magnum Hunter may require additional financing in connection therewith. Magnum Hunter does not budget for acquisition expenditures.
The following summarizes the oil and gas properties acquired in the Prize merger (in millions):
| Oil & Gas Properties |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Unproved |
Proved |
Other Property |
Total |
||||||||
| Acquisition Costs | $ | 140,312 | $ | 453,834 | $ | 22,826 | $ | 616,972 | ||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS. Magnum Hunter has the following contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:
| |
Payments Due by Period |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
4-5 Years |
After 5 Years |
||||||
| |
(in thousands) |
||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations: | |||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 640,000 | — | 320,000 | — | 320,000 | ||||||
| Fixed-Rate Interest Payments | 140,400 | 18,720 | 37,440 | 37,440 | 46,800 | ||||||
| Capital Leases | 5,500 | 2,458 | 3,042 | — | — | ||||||
| Commodity Derivatives | 20,027 | 14,046 | 5,981 | — | — | ||||||
| Operating Leases | 6,532 | 2,381 | 2,079 | 1,310 | 762 | ||||||
| Total Contractual Obligations | 812,459 | 37,605 | 368,542 | 38,750 | 367,562 | ||||||
Magnum Hunter has no off balance sheet arrangements, variable interest entities, or financing partnerships. In the past it has provided trade guarantees on behalf of its formerly 30% owned affiliate, NGTS. The last of these guarantees expired in July 2003. Further, Magnum Hunter has sold its 30% ownership interest in NGTS, and, therefore, no longer maintains any equity interest in this affiliate. On February 18, 2005, Magnum Hunter's 40% owned subsidiary, Apple Tree Holdings, LLC entered into a $20.6 million construction loan agreement, referred to as the Construction Loan. The Construction Loan provides financing for the construction of a processing plant, natural gas lateral, carbon dioxide line and related infrastructure in Huerfano County, Colorado. The Construction Loan bears interest at either LIBOR plus 2.25% or a base rate plus 1.25% and will mature no later than July 31, 2006. Magnum Hunter has provided a guaranty to the lender for this Construction Loan. In return for its guaranty, Magnum Hunter received an up-front cash payment as well as a 55% distribution of cash flows from the entity until certain financial tests are met. In the event that the Construction Loan goes into default and Magnum Hunter has to pay on the guaranty, Magnum Hunter will have recourse against the project and related subsidiaries.
Magnum Hunter's 2005 capital expenditure budget is $250 million. Based on its reserve report, future development costs are estimated to be $351 million for its proved reserves and $206.8 million for its probable reserves.
In relation to its hedging programs, Magnum Hunter could have significant cash payments related to current derivative positions. Based on current pricing, Magnum Hunter will make payments of $14.0 million during 2005 and $6.0 million during 2006 related to its hedging program. These payment estimates are based on December 31, 2004 commodity prices, and will vary in the future. Please see
IV-22
Item 7A and Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to Magnum Hunter's derivatives and market risk.
Magnum Hunter makes significant interest payments each year on its debt. During 2004, Magnum Hunter paid $49.7 million in interest and recorded a liability for $5.8 million for 2004 interest which would be paid during 2005. At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had $195 million fixed rate debt and $450.5 million in variable rate debt; interest payments are made at least semi-annually under all of its debt agreements. Magnum Hunter expects debt levels in the future to decrease over time, unless it completes a significant acquisition. With respect to the variable rate debt, Magnum Hunter is exposed to interest rate risk. Please see Item 7A and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about its debt.
Magnum Hunter currently has $113.8 million in federal and state income tax net operating loss carryforwards, which, for the most part, prevent it from paying income taxes. These losses will expire, if unused, in years 2012 through 2023. Approximately $51.4 million of these losses are limited to $7.8 million per year. Magnum Hunter expects it will be able to continue to offset any federal taxes due with these losses for the foreseeable future. Magnum Hunter provided a $2 million valuation allowance for utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards in 2004.
In relation to its oil and gas properties, Magnum Hunter has substantial retirement obligations. Magnum Hunter estimates that it will have obligations of $41.3 million in plugging and abandonment costs related to its current properties. While Magnum Hunter does not anticipate material payments in relation to its plugging obligations until 2017 and beyond, the timing of these costs is not subject to its control. Please see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Magnum Hunter's asset retirement obligations.
RECENT TRENDS. The following is a discussion of recent trends Magnum Hunter considers important and its assessment of the impact of these trends on its business plan.
Commodity prices. Magnum Hunter believes that natural gas prices (NYMEX index) will average between $4.00 and $7.00 per MCF over the next several years and will likely remain volatile. Magnum Hunter based its 2005 capital and operating budgets on prices of approximately $6.22 per Mcf. Crude oil prices have increased significantly, but in Magnum Hunter's view are much more variable due to worldwide political and economic factors. For 2005 budgeting purposes, Magnum Hunter has assumed crude prices will average approximately $45.60 per Bbl (NYMEX index). Its production mix is largely natural gas, and therefore its gross margins are largely driven by natural gas prices.
Interest rates. Magnum Hunter has experienced an unusually low interest rate environment for the past several years. Magnum Hunter expects interest rates to increase moderately over the next several years. By December 31, 2005, it expects that approximately 39% of its debt will be fixed at 9.6% through at least 2007 and potentially 2012, with the remaining 61% to be variable rate debt.
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion (DD&A). Magnum Hunter's exploration and production segment DD&A rate has increased an annual average of 15% per year since 1999. This increase is primarily attributable to its increased capital expenditures in the offshore Gulf of Mexico region where, typically for its industry, finding and development costs per unit are higher than its average finding and development costs per unit have been historically onshore and its significant New Mexico property acquisition. Magnum Hunter expects to continue to spend a significant percentage of its total capital expenditures budget on offshore Gulf of Mexico projects due to economic parameters experienced in that region. Assuming similar results in its drilling activities and reserve recognition to what it has been achieving, Magnum Hunter would expect its DD&A rate to continue to increase.
Magnum Hunter management's assessment of the impact of these trends on its business plan. Magnum Hunter has concentrated its capital budget in areas where it expect to realize the highest
IV-23
financial benefits, including rate of return and return on capital deployed. As such, it has dedicated significant portions of its capital expenditure budget to the offshore Gulf of Mexico region and onshore in the Southeast New Mexico area over the past several years.
Magnum Hunter has significant exploration, development and exploitation opportunities both onshore and offshore. Magnum Hunter management continues to monitor commodity prices, finding and development costs and interest rates, among other factors, to determine both the total dollars to be spent and the allocation of these dollars among alternative projects within the capital budget. Even if DD&A rates and interest rates continue to increase, and commodity price increases in turn offset these expenses, then Magnum Hunter would expect to continue its current business plan. Magnum Hunter believes it has significant flexibility in the management of its cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies and Other
Magnum Hunter's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The reported financial results and disclosures were determined using significant accounting policies, practices and estimates as described below. Magnum Hunter believes the reported financial results are reliable and that the ultimate actual results will not differ significantly from those reported.
Oil and Gas Properties
Magnum Hunter uses the full cost method of accounting for its investment in oil and gas properties. Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs of acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas proved reserves, including directly related overhead costs, are capitalized into a "full-cost pool" on a country-by-country basis as incurred. Internal costs that directly relate to acquisition, exploration and development activities totaled $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The balance of capitalized costs included in oil and gas properties for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $6.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Magnum Hunter's management believes that the basis it uses to determine the amount of internal costs capitalized is appropriate.
All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves and estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are amortized on the unit-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. Costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization base until the related properties are evaluated. Such unproved properties are assessed for impairment quarterly and any provision for impairment is transferred to the full-cost amortization base. Sales of oil and gas properties, including consideration received from sales or transfers of properties in connection with partnerships, joint venture operations or drilling arrangements, are credited to the full-cost pool unless the sale would have a significant effect on the amortization rate. Abandonment of properties is accounted for as an adjustment to capitalized costs with no loss recognized.
Costs are transferred into the amortization base on an ongoing basis as the projects are evaluated and proved reserves are established or impairment determined. Pending determination of proved reserves attributable to the above costs, Magnum Hunter cannot assess the future impact on the amortization rate.
The capitalized costs are subject to a "ceiling test," which generally limits such costs less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes to the aggregate of the estimated present value of future net revenues from proved reserves discounted at ten percent (PV-10) based on current economic and operating conditions less income tax effects related to the differences between the book and tax basis of the oil and gas properties. The ceiling test is performed on a quarterly basis. Magnum Hunter experienced no impairment in 2004, 2003, or 2002.
IV-24
All costs relating to production activities are charged to expense as incurred.
In accordance with SFAS 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," Magnum Hunter carries a liability for any legal retirement obligations on its oil and gas properties. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the full-cost pool and depleted on the unit of production basis.
For purposes of the ceiling test, Magnum Hunter removes the discounted present value included in its future development costs on its reserve report for which it has already booked an obligation under SFAS 143. For purposes of its depletion calculation, Magnum Hunter includes in future development costs the estimated plugging and abandonment costs, net of estimated salvage values, for proved undeveloped wells. For purposes of both of these calculations, Magnum Hunter does not include plugging and abandonment costs in its future development costs on developed proportions for which it has booked an obligation under SFAS 143.
Reserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent on the quality of available data and on engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserve estimates are subject to change over time as additional information becomes available.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when title to the product transfers to purchasers. Magnum Hunter follows the "sales method" of accounting for revenue for oil and natural gas production, so that it recognizes sales revenue on all production sold to purchasers, regardless of whether the sales are proportionate to its ownership in the property. In these instances when Magnum Hunter's sales are not proportionate to its interests, a receivable or liability is recognized only to the extent that Magnum Hunter has an imbalance on a specific property greater than the expected remaining proved reserves. Current revenues are accrued based on Magnum Hunter's expectation of actual deliveries and actual prices received. Plant revenues are recognized as product is sold, and its gathering fees are recognized as the gathering services are performed. Revenues for Magnum Hunter's oilfield management services segment are recognized as services are performed and equipment is delivered.
Derivative Instruments
Magnum Hunter's product price and interest hedging activities are described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. Periodically Magnum Hunter enters into derivative instruments such as futures, swaps and options contracts to reduce the adverse effects of fluctuations in natural gas and crude oil prices. Under Magnum Hunter's risk management policy, at inception, commodity hedge positions may not exceed 75% of natural gas and 90% of crude oil current forecasted (18 months) commodity production. For forecasted non-current (greater than 18 months) commodity production, at inception, commodity hedge positions for natural gas and crude oil may not exceed 75% of forecasted production for each product. Magnum Hunter also utilizes, from time to time, financial derivative instruments to hedge the risk associated with interest on its outstanding debt. Generally, the cash settlement of all derivative instruments is recognized as income or expense in the period in which the hedged transaction is recognized.
All freestanding financial derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts if certain criteria are met, are recognized at estimated fair value on Magnum Hunter's balance sheet. Magnum Hunter determines its fair values based on market values obtained from its counterparties. Derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through net income. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the hedged items, and are recognized in net income. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are cash-flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as the hedged items are recognized in net income.
IV-25
Ineffective portions of a derivative instrument's change in fair value are immediately recognized in net income.
Goodwill
As a result of its merger with Prize, Magnum Hunter currently has $56.5 million of goodwill recorded on its books. Under SFAS No. 142, Magnum Hunter will not amortize any of the goodwill acquired in the merger. All goodwill has been allocated to the Exploration and Production reporting unit. Magnum Hunter tests its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or whenever indicators of impairment exist. Magnum Hunter performed its annual impairment test at December 31, 2004, and determined that no impairment existed. The annual impairment test requires management to make significant estimates and judgments. If impairment is determined to exist, Magnum Hunter will measure its impairment based on a comparison of the carrying value of goodwill to the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the Exploration and Production reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, impairment will be recognized in the income statement.
Stock Compensation
At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had four stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Magnum Hunter accounts for its employee stock option plans under SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123," in December 2002. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. On June 1, 2003, and effective January 1, 2003, Magnum Hunter began expensing the fair market value of stock options newly granted, modified or settled pursuant to SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and as allowed under the prospective method of SFAS No. 148. The fair value of each option granted after December 31, 2002, is estimated on the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, Magnum Hunter recorded stock compensation expense of $3.0 million and $768 thousand, respectively, which is reflected in its general and administrative expenses. For options granted prior to January 1, 2003, Magnum Hunter continues to use the intrinsic method under APB No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Related Interpretations," whereby no compensation expense is recognized for stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of Magnum Hunter stock on the grant date. Magnum Hunter's future accounting for stock-based compensation will be impacted by the issuance of SFAS No. 123(R). Please see "—Recently Issued Statements" discussion below for additional information.
IV-26
If Magnum Hunter had recorded stock option expense under the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123 for all prior and current grants, its net income and earnings per share ("EPS") would have been as shown in the below pro forma tables (in thousands):
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| Net income, as reported | $ | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | |||||
Total Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of income taxes of $278 and $1,144, respectively |
490 |
1,873 |
— |
||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of income taxes of $1,871, $2,896, and $1,962 respectively |
(3,298 |
) |
(4,751 |
) |
(3,219 |
) |
|||||
| Pro forma net income | $ | 100,765 | $ | 23,239 | $ | 12,303 | |||||
Earnings per share: |
|||||||||||
| Basic—as reported | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | |||||
| Basic—pro forma | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.20 | |||||
| Diluted—as reported | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | |||||
| Diluted—pro forma | $ | 1.28 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.20 | |||||
Magnum Hunter estimated the fair value of each stock based grant (options and warrants) using the Black-Scholes option pricing method while using the following weighted average assumptions:
| |
2004(a) |
2003(b) |
2002 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.38 | % | 1.58 | % | 3.68 | % | ||||
| Expected life | 4.1 years | 2.1 years | 7.4 years | |||||||
| Expected volatility | 40.7 | % | 46.3 | % | 49.5 | % | ||||
| Dividend yield | — | — | — | |||||||
| Weighted average fair value of options granted | $ | 3.81 | $ | 3.03 | $ | 3.17 | ||||
- (a)
- Magnum
Hunter granted 1,403,000 options during 2004, which had a reduced term of four years. Prior grants have ten-year terms.
- (b)
- Magnum Hunter granted 999,260 options during 2003, which had a reduced term of three years. Prior grants have ten-year terms.
Income Taxes
Magnum Hunter files a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due, if any, plus net deferred taxes related primarily to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets include recognition of operating losses that are available to offset future taxable income and tax credits that are available to offset future income taxes. Valuation allowances are recognized to limit recognition of deferred tax assets where appropriate. Such allowances may be reversed when circumstances provide evidence that the deferred tax assets will more
IV-27
likely than not be realized. Magnum Hunter recorded an allowance on certain state operating losses of $2.0 million during 2004.
Asset Retirement Obligations
SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," became effective beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires the recognition of a fair value liability for any retirement obligation associated with long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. See Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Magnum Hunter's asset retirement obligations. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 143, Magnum Hunter recorded an addition to oil and gas properties of $25.4 million, an asset retirement obligation of $30.4 million, a reduction of accumulated depletion of $5.6 million, and a pre-tax gain of $643 thousand. The retirement obligation requires management to make significant estimates and judgments regarding Magnum Hunter's expected plugging costs and retirement dates.
Recently Issued Statements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 142-2, "Application of FASB Statement 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to Oil-and-Gas Producing Entities after evaluating an issue involving the classification of mineral rights. In June 2001, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations," which requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. In July 2001, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which discontinues the practice of amortizing goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets and initiates an annual review of impairment. Intangible assets with a determinable useful life will continue to be amortized over that period. The amortization provisions apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 141 and 142 clarify that more assets should be distinguished and classified between tangible and intangible. Magnum Hunter did not change or reclassify contractual mineral rights included in proved and unproved oil and gas properties on its balance sheet upon adoption of SFAS No. 142. Magnum Hunter believes the treatment of such mineral rights as tangible assets under the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties is appropriate. An issue was raised regarding whether these mineral rights should be classified as tangible or intangible assets. FSP No. 142-2 addressed this issue and supports Magnum Hunter's current accounting treatment of mineral rights and will not impact its financial statements. This FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after September 2, 2004.
FASB issued FSP FAS 129-1, "Disclosure Requirements Under FASB Statement No. 129, Disclosure of Information About Capital Structure," in April 2004. This FSP provides additional guidance on the disclosure requirements of contingently convertible securities. Magnum Hunter made the required disclosures related to the terms of its Convertible Notes in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and has provided explanations in Note 6 of its Form 10-K about the dilutive effects of these notes on its earnings per share, referred to as EPS.
FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") has issued an Abstract for EITF Issue No. 04-8, "The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share," which addresses the issue of when the dilutive effects of contingently convertible debt instruments should be included in diluted earnings per share. This guidance requires companies to include the dilutive effect of convertible debt securities in diluted earnings per share regardless of whether or not the contingent conversion features have been triggered. The principal of Magnum Hunter's Convertible Notes must be settled in cash, with the conversion spread settled in stock. This EITF is effective for periods ending after December 15, 2004. Magnum Hunter has accordingly included approximately 94 thousand
IV-28
potential shares to be issued for its Convertible Notes in its earnings per share computations for the year ending 2004 based on the spread between its average market price during the year and the conversion price on these notes. Magnum Hunter did not include any potential dilution for the 2003 period because the conversion price did not exceed its average market price during that period.
The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 106 was released in September 2004. SAB 106 expresses the SEC staff's views on the interaction of SFAS No. 143 and the full cost method and provides guidance on computing the full cost ceiling as well as depreciation, depletion, and amortization. The SAB also requires additional disclosures regarding how the application of SFAS No. 143 has affected the ceiling test and depreciation, depletion and amortization. This guidance is effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after its publication. Magnum Hunter implemented this guidance for its ceiling test and depletion calculations during the fourth quarter of 2004 and experienced no significant impact.
FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," during December 2004. Under this revised guidance, all share-based equity and liability instruments will be recorded as compensation expense based on their fair values, and all liability instruments will be remeasured each reporting period. This guidance will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual or interim reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, which would cause Magnum Hunter to adopt this statement July 1, 2005. Magnum Hunter currently accounts for its stock-based compensation under the prospective method, under which it only records compensation expense on awards granted after 2003. Upon adoption of this statement, Magnum Hunter will apply the modified prospective method to its equity instruments under which compensation expense will also be recorded on the unvested portions of awards granted prior to 2003. At this time, Magnum Hunter estimates the impact of these prior years' grants on 2005 earnings to be an additional pre-tax expense of $1.2 million.
FASB also issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29," during December 2004. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 by eliminating the exception from fair value measurement prescribed in that statement and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that have no significant impact on future cash flows. This statement is effective for exchanges that take place in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Magnum Hunter does not expect this statement to have an impact on its future financials.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the past, Magnum Hunter has provided trade guarantees on behalf of an unconsolidated affiliate, which has since been sold. The last of these guarantees expired in July 2003. Further, Magnum Hunter sold its 30% ownership interest in NGTS and, therefore, no longer maintains any equity interest in this former affiliate. On February 18, 2005 Magnum Hunter's 40% owned subsidiary, Apple Tree Holdings, LLC entered into a $20.6 million construction loan agreement, referred to as Construction Loan. The Construction Loan provides financing for the construction of a processing plant, natural gas lateral, carbon dioxide line and related infrastructure in Huerfano County, Colorado. The Construction Loan bears interest at either LIBOR plus 2.25% or a base rate plus 1.25% and will mature no later than July 31, 2006. Magnum Hunter has provided a guaranty to the lender for this Construction Loan. In return for its guaranty, Magnum Hunter received an up-front cash payment as well as 55% distribution of cash flows from the entity until certain financial tests are met.
Magnum Hunter had equity and debt investments in a privately held entity which declared bankruptcy on March 4, 2002, and for which it recorded an impairment charge against earnings of $5.0 million at December 31, 2001. Magnum Hunter is not responsible for any debts of this entity. Magnum Hunter had an investment in available-for-sale securities of another entity of $2.8 million at December 31, 2001. Because of the deteriorating financial condition of this entity, Magnum Hunter recorded an other than temporary impairment of $2.1 million as a charge against earnings at
IV-29
December 31, 2001, and it recorded an additional impairment for the remaining carrying value of this asset at June 30, 2002. Magnum Hunter is not responsible for any debts of this entity.
Other
At March 1, 2005, Magnum Hunter had approximately 43% of its natural gas production and approximately 17% of its crude oil production hedged through December 31, 2005. In addition, Magnum Hunter had approximately 11% of its natural gas production and 8% of its crude oil production hedged for the calendar year 2006. Unless Magnum Hunter enters into additional hedging transactions, the remainder of its hydrocarbon volumes will be sold at market prices. Future commodity price declines will negatively impact future income and cash flow to the extent of any production sold at market prices. These declines could ultimately affect the quantity of proved oil and gas reserves and cost center ceiling values. These results, individually or collectively, could result in bank debt default and/or debt acceleration, restrict Magnum Hunter's ability to attract qualified personnel or cause further industry consolidation. There is no requirement from any of Magnum Hunter's lenders to hedge its products.
Magnum Hunter's domestic operations are concentrated in the southwestern and mid-continent regions of the United States and shallow water region of the Gulf of Mexico offshore Texas and Louisiana. Magnum Hunter currently has no operations outside of the United States of America. Magnum Hunter currently has 27 wells that individually produce a net 1.5 MMcfe per day or greater, but these are not concentrated in any one field. Magnum Hunter has no individual fields in which disruptions could materially reduce its financial results.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Magnum Hunter's operations are exposed to market risks primarily as a result of changes in commodity prices and interest rates. Magnum Hunter does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Energy Swap Agreements
Magnum Hunter produces, purchases, and sells crude oil, natural gas, condensate, and natural gas liquids. As a result, Magnum Hunter's financial results can be significantly impacted as these commodity prices fluctuate widely in response to changing market forces. Magnum Hunter has previously engaged in oil and gas hedging activities and intend to continue to consider various hedging arrangements to realize commodity prices which it considers favorable and to reduce volatility. Magnum Hunter engages in futures contracts with certain of its oil and gas production through various contracts, referred to as Swap Agreements. The primary objective of these activities is to protect against significant decreases in price during the term of the hedge.
The Swap Agreements provide for separate contracts tied to the New York Mercantile Exchange, referred to as NYMEX, light sweet crude oil futures and Henry Hub natural gas futures, and to the Inside FERC natural gas index price postings, referred to as Index. Magnum Hunter has combined contracts which have agreed upon price floors and ceilings, referred to as Costless Collars. When the Index price exceeds the contract ceiling, Magnum Hunter pays the spread between the ceiling and the Index price applied to the related contract volumes. When the contract floor exceeds the Index, Magnum Hunter receives the spread between the contract floor and the Index price applied to the related contract volumes.
To the extent Magnum Hunter receives the spread between the contract floor and the Index price applied to related contract volumes, it has a credit risk in the event of nonperformance of the counterparty to the agreement. Magnum Hunter does not anticipate any material impact to its results of operations as a result of nonperformance by these counterparties.
IV-30
Magnum Hunter has no margin deposits with any counter-parties as of December 31, 2004 related to hedge transactions. Magnum Hunter does not intend to enter into any new hedging contracts with institutions that require margin deposits.
At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had open contracts with the following terms:
| Commodity |
Type |
Volume/Day |
Duration |
Wtd. Avg. Price |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas | Collar | 60,000 MMBTU | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $4.21 - $6.85 | ||||
| Natural Gas | Swap | 20,000 MMBTU | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $6.25 | ||||
| Natural Gas | Collar | 20,000 MMBTU | Jan 06 - Dec 06 | $5.25 - $6.30 | ||||
| Crude Oil | Swap | 1,000 BBL | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $34.90 | ||||
| Crude Oil | Collar | 1,000 BBL | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $35.00 - $55.00 | ||||
| Crude Oil | Collar | 1,000 BBL | Jan 06 - Dec 06 | $30.00 - $35.85 |
Based on future market prices at December 31, 2004, the fair value of open contracts to Magnum Hunter was a net liability of $19.8 million. If future market prices were to increase 10% from those in effect at December 31, 2004, the fair value of Magnum Hunter's open contracts would be a liability of $39.1 million. If future market prices were to decline 10% from those at December 31, 2004, the fair value of Magnum Hunter's open contracts would be a liability of $6.5 million.
At inception, commodity hedge positions may not exceed 75% of natural gas and 90% of crude oil forecasted current (18 months) commodity production. For non-current (greater than 18 months) commodity production, at inception, commodity hedge positions for natural gas and crude oil may not exceed 75% of forecasted production for each product. Unhedged portions of Magnum Hunter's natural gas and crude oil production will be subject to market price fluctuations.
Fixed and Variable Debt
Magnum Hunter uses fixed and variable debt to partially finance budgeted expenditures. These agreements expose Magnum Hunter to market risk related to changes in interest rates.
The following table presents the carrying and fair value of Magnum Hunter's debt along with average interest rates. Fair values are calculated as the net present value of the expected cash flows of the financial instruments, except for the 9.6% Senior Notes and the Convertible Notes, which are valued at their last traded value before December 31, 2004.
| Expected Maturity Dates |
2005 |
2006 - 2007 |
2012 |
2023 |
Total |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||
| Variable Rate Debt: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Bank Debt(a) | $ | — | $ | 320,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 320,000 | $ | 320,000 | |||||||
| Convertible Notes(b) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 125,000 | $ | 125,000 | $ | 151,719 | |||||||
| Capital Lease Obligations(c) | $ | 2,458 | $ | 3,042 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,500 | $ | 5,500 | |||||||
| Fixed Rate Debt: | |||||||||||||||||||
| 9.6% Senior Notes | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 195,000 | $ | — | $ | 195,000 | $ | 221,325 | |||||||
- (a)
- The
weighted average interest rate on the bank debt with recourse at December 31, 2004 was 3.92%.
- (b)
- The
interest rate on the Convertible Notes at December 31, 2004 was 2.49%. The rate on these Convertible Notes is equal to the three month LIBOR, adjusted quarterly. A holder
of these notes has the right to require Magnum Hunter to repurchase all or a portion of the notes on December 15, 2008, 2013, and 2018. The repurchase price will be equal to the face value of
the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the date of repurchase.
- (c)
- The weighted average interest rate on capital lease obligations at December 31, 2004 was 5.58%.
IV-31
Additional information regarding Magnum Hunter and its business can be found in "Chapter I—The Merger—The Companies—Magnum Hunter."
Magnum Hunter's major properties are located in four core areas: (i) the Mid-Continent region, (ii) the Permian Basin, (iii) the Gulf Coast region and (iv) the Gulf of Mexico.
Mid-Continent Region
Magnum Hunter's Mid-Continent operations include assets principally located in the Ardmore Basin in south central Oklahoma/Texas Panhandle and in Southwestern Arkansas. The majority of these properties were acquired from Burlington Resources, Spirit 76, Vastar and Prize. Approximately 72% of the estimated reserves are natural gas and 28% are oil and natural gas liquids located on approximately 263,216 net mineral leasehold acres in twenty-seven counties in Oklahoma, eleven counties in Texas and two counties in Arkansas. As of December 31, 2004, DeGolyer and MacNaughton, referred to as D&M, and Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., referred to as Cawley Gillespie, independent reservoir engineers, have estimated the Mid-Continent properties proved reserves at 12.1 MMBbl of oil and natural gas liquids and 182.8 Bcf of natural gas, or, on a natural gas equivalent basis, 255.6 Bcfe. Total net daily production from the Mid-Continent properties for the month of December 2004 was 34.9 MMcf/d for natural gas and 1,273 Bbl/d of oil and natural gas liquids or 42.5 MMcfe/d. Magnum Hunter's wholly-owned subsidiary, Gruy Petroleum Management Co., referred to as Gruy, is the operator of approximately 85% of the wells located in the Mid-Continent Region. Additional Mid-Continent development drilling, recompletion activities and improvements to existing waterflood operations focus on the Walnut Bend Field, the Red Deer Creek Field, the Madill Field and the Eola-Robberson Field.
Panoma. The Panoma properties currently consist of approximately 544 natural gas wells in the East Panhandle and South Erick Fields along a corridor 66 miles long and 20 miles wide stretching from Beckham County, Oklahoma to Gray County, Texas. All wells are less than 2,300 feet deep and produce natural gas from the Granite Wash and/or Brown Dolomite formations. For the month of December 2004, net natural gas sales were approximately 9.0 MMcf/d, which excludes liquids processed from this natural gas stream through Magnum Hunter's gas processing facility located adjacent to these fields, known as the McLean Plant. Development continues with increased density drilling in the West Panhandle.
Eola-Robberson. The Eola-Robberson Field is located in Garvin County, Oklahoma and has been producing since 1920. It is productive in multiple reservoirs from the fractured Devonion Klippe at 6,400 feet to the Basal Oil Creek at 11,800 feet. The field has primarily been developed within two units, the Eola North Fault Block Unit and the South Eola Bromide Sand Unit. The waterfloods for this field were discontinued in 1992, with the South Eola Bromide Sand Unit being disbanded in 2003. The wellbores are being recompleted into bypassed oil pockets in the Bromide, McLish and Oil Creek and the fractured gas reservoirs such as the Sycamore, Woodford, Hunton and Viola. Magnum Hunter has an interest in 66 producing wells, with working interests varying from 8% to 100%. Magnum Hunter operates all but 14 of these wells. For the month of December 2004, net production from the field averaged 6,399 Mcf/d and 380 Bbl/d.
Cumberland. The Cumberland Field is located in Bryan and Marshall Counties, Oklahoma. It was discovered in 1940 and is productive in multiple reservoirs from the Goddard down to the Arbuckle formation. Depths range from 2,000 feet to 6,800 feet. Initially, the field produced oil from the Bromide, McLish and Oil Creek formations. These zones were unitized in 1964 for waterflood
IV-32
operations, which continue today. The "Shallow Gas" zones include the Sycamore, Woodford, Hunton, and Viola. These formations are predominantly gas productive and are produced commingled. Development drilling plans exist for four additional proved undeveloped locations to exploit the shallow gas on 160 acre spacing and one proved undeveloped location in the Oil Creek formation. The shallowest zone in the field is the Goddard, which is a channel sand. Magnum Hunter has an interest in 74 active wells, with working interests varying from 17% to 100%. Magnum Hunter operates all but 10 of these wells. For the month of December 2004, net production from the field averaged 6,061 Mcf/d and 144 Bbl/d.
Walnut Bend. The Walnut Bend Field is located in Cooke County, Texas. The field was discovered in the late 1930's and produces oil and gas from numerous intervals ranging in depth from 2,000 feet in the Montgomery sands to over 7,000 feet in the Ellenburger carbonate. There are currently 107 active producing wells and 31 active injection wells. Magnum Hunter's working interest ownership in the wells is approximately 91%. For the month of December 2004, net production from the wells averaged 86 Mcf/d and 568 Bbl/d. Current activities in the field include a recompletion program on both active and inactive wellbores as identified by a two-year geological study. This will include the initiation of numerous small waterflood projects.
Madill. The Madill Field is located in Marshall County in Southern Oklahoma. The first production from this field occurred in 1906 and produces primarily gas from various shallow reservoirs, such as the Sycamore, Woodford, Viola and Bromide at depths ranging from 3,750 feet to 5,700 feet. There are currently 57 active producing wells. Magnum Hunter's working interest ownership in the wells varies from 41% to 100%. For the month of December 2004, net production from the wells averaged 1,202 Mcf/d and 56 Bbl/d.
Red Deer Creek. The Red Deer Creek Field and the adjoining Shriekey West Field are located in Roberts County, Texas in the Texas Panhandle. Initial production was established in 1958 in the Lower Albany Dolomite and subsequent successful completions were made in the Wolfcamp, Granite Wash, and Morrow. Producing depths range from 4,100 ft. to 11,000 ft. There are currently 27 active wellbores with working interest ownerships ranging from 53% to 100%. During 2004, these fields benefited from 11 recompletions in the Granite Wash. The Red Deer Creek Field has been re-spaced to 40 acres and a drilling program is slated to begin in 2005 with the Granite Wash as its target. For the month of December 2004, net production from these wells averaged 2,632 Mcf/d and 25 Bbl/d.
Permian Basin
Magnum Hunter's Permian Basin operations include assets located in West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico with an interest in 3,840 wells located in 240 different fields. Magnum Hunter's wholly-owned subsidiary, Gruy Petroleum, is the operator of approximately 77% of the producing wells. Management believes the Permian Basin properties will continue to provide significant opportunities for exploitation of oil and natural gas through development drilling, workovers, recompletions, and optimization of enhanced oil recovery projects. As of December 31, 2004, the Permian Basin properties had proved reserves of 48.9 MMBbl of oil and 299.5 Bcf of natural gas, or on a natural gas equivalent basis, 592.8 Bcfe. Total net daily production from the Permian Basin properties for the month of December 2004 was approximately 60,269 Mcf/d of natural gas an 7,451 Bbls/d of oil or 104.9 MMcfe/d.
In evaluating the Permian Basin properties, Magnum Hunter has identified 509 drilling locations including developmental production and injection wells. The top valued fields in the Permian Basin are Spraberry, Westbrook, Warwink, Howard Glasscock, Jo-Mill, Kermit, Keystone, Willo, P&P and the Southeast New Mexico area.
IV-33
Spraberry. The Spraberry field is located in Irion, Glasscock and Reagan Counties, Texas. Magnum Hunter owns interest in 309 oil and gas wells. Gruy Petroleum operates 98% of the wells in this field. The NG Tex acquisition in 2004 added several operated wells to Magnum Hunter's existing position in the Spraberry trend. For the month of December 2004, Magnum Hunter's net production in this field averaged 344 Bbl/d and 2,685 Mcf/d. The wells in this field produce from the Spraberry formation at approximately 6,000 feet D&M has identified 88 infill PUD locations with net reserves of 30.7 Bcfe. Magnum Hunter has several wells budgeted for 2005 in this trend.
Westbrook. The Westbrook field is located in Mitchell County, Texas and produces from the Clearfork formation at a depth of approximately 3,200 feet. Gruy operates the Southwest Westbrook Unit and Morrison G lease and Magnum Hunter owns an 89% and 100% working interest, respectively. Magnum Hunter also owns a small working interest in the Enervest operated North Westbrook Unit. As of December 31, 2004, there were 122 active wells in these three leases. For the month of December 2004, net production from the wells averaged 823 Bbl/d. The initial wells in this area were drilled in the 1920's and waterflood operations began in the 1960's. Magnum Hunter is actively drilling infill wells and optimizing waterflood operations in the Southwest Westbrook Unit.
Warwink. The Warwink field is located in Ward and Winkler Counties, Texas. Magnum Hunter owns interests in 52 wells producing from the Cherry Canyon formation at depths from 4,800 to 7,400 feet. Magnum Hunter's working interest ownership in these wells varies from 71% to 85% and all wells are operated by Gruy. For the month of December 2004, Magnum Hunter's net production from these wells averaged 324 Bbl/d and 1,003 Mcf/d. The wells in this field have multiple stacked Cherry Canyon sands that can be produced together. Several behind pipe zones have been identified and Magnum Hunter is actively adding these zones in the existing wells.
Howard Glasscock. The Howard Glasscock field is located on the border of Howard and Glasscock Counties, Texas. Magnum Hunter owns an interest in 175 wells, of which 93% are operated by Gruy. Magnum Hunter acquired additional interests in 2002 on two properties, regaining operations and increasing the working interest from 50% to 100%. Magnum Hunter's working interest in the other wells in this area range from 5% to 100%. For the month of December 2004, Magnum Hunter's net production from these wells averaged 640 Bbl/d for oil, and 109 Mcf/d for gas. The properties in the Howard Glasscock field consist of multiple waterfloods in the San Andres, Glorietta and Clearfork formations. Magnum Hunter also owns interests in leases that have been identified as future waterflood candidates.
Jo-Mill. The Jo-Mill field is located in Borden County, Texas and produces in the Sprayberry formation at approximately 7,100 to 7,500 feet. Magnum Hunter owns a non-operated working interest that ranges from 5% to 33% in three different waterflood units. Magnum Hunter's net production from these three units averaged 671 Bbl/d and 243 Mcf/d in December of 2004. These fields were unitized between 1963 and 1973 and were initially waterflooded on a peripheral pattern with 80 acre spacing. From the mid 70's to the 90's, multiple infill wells were drilled to convert the floods to a line drive pattern on 40 acre spacing. In 2000, ChevronTexaco started drilling 20 acre infill wells in their operated Jo-Mill Unit. D&M has assigned net proved undeveloped reserves of 8,392 MMcfe to an additional 120 locations in the ChevronTexaco operated Jo-Mill Unit.
Kermit. The Kermit field is located in the heart of Winkler County, Texas. Magnum Hunter owns interests in 191 oil and gas wells with a working interest varying from 21% to 100%. Gruy operates 89% of the wells in this field. The average December 2004 net production from these wells was 169 Bbl/d and 3,521 Mcf/d. The wells in this field produce from several different horizons, including the Ellenburger, McKee, Fusselman, Devonian, Clearfork, Holt, Colby and Yates. The majority of the wells Magnum Hunter has an interest in are currently producing from the Yates gas cap.
IV-34
Keystone. The Keystone field is located in Winkler County, Texas. Magnum Hunter owns an interest in 248 oil and gas wells of which 99.9% are operated by Gruy. These wells produced an average of 296 Bbl/d and 406 Mcf/d net in December 2004. Magnum Hunter owns 100% working interests in the East Keystone Unit where waterflood operations commenced in June of 2002. This unit is flooding the San Andres and Holt formations on a 20 acre 5 spot pattern. Initial waterflood response has been seen in most parts of the field.
Willo. The Willo field is located in Crockett and Val Verde Counties, Texas. Magnum Hunter owns an interest in 17 oil and gas wells producing from the Ellenburger, Strawn and Canyon/Wolfcamp formations. Magnum Hunter's working interest ranges from 23% to 100% in this field with 82% of the wells operated by Gruy. Magnum Hunter's average net production for December 2004 for these wells was 2,129 Mcf/d. The most prolific zone in this field is the Ellenburger dolomite at an average depth of 14,000 feet. This zone accounts for 94% of the 8.9 MMcfe net proved developed producing reserves assigned to this field by D&M. Proved undeveloped reserves of 17.0 MMcfe net for four additional Ellenburger wells have been identified by D&M.
P&P. The P&P field is located in Crane County, Texas producing from the Devonian at a depth of 5,500 feet. This field was unitized as the River Bend Devonian Unit for waterflood operations in 2000. Water injection was started in September of 2000 and the unit has experienced an increase in net oil production from 160 Bbl/d in April of 2001 to 350 Bbl/d in December of 2004. Magnum Hunter owns a 47% working interest in 20 wells and all are operated by Gruy. This field is located adjacent to the Gruy operated Abell Devonian Unit that has been under waterflood operations in the Devonian since 1961. Proved undeveloped reserves were assigned by D&M to the River Bend Devonian Unit in contemplation of a carbon dioxide injection project that is anticipated to follow waterflood operations.
Southeast New Mexico. The Southeast New Mexico properties consist of approximately 1,100 wells in Chaves, Lea, and Eddy Counties, of which 71% are operated by Gruy. Several of Magnum Hunter's fields in Lea County produce from the Yates, Seven Rivers, Queen and other formations at depths generally shallower than 3,000 feet. The average net production for the Southeast New Mexico properties for December 2004 was 1,915 Bbl/d and 42,784 Mcf/d. Magnum Hunter has been actively drilling increased density wells in the Morrow formation at approximately 11,500 feet. Magnum Hunter participated in 34 Morrow wells in 2004 and has 23 operated wells planned for 2005. D&M has identified 93 proved undeveloped locations for the Morrow, with net reserves of 64.8 BCFe. Several of the Morrow wells have identified proved developed non-producing areas in the Atoka and Strawn formations. The Encana acquisition that closed in 2004 greatly increased Magnum Hunter's upside potential in S. E. New Mexico.
Gulf Coast
Magnum Hunter owns an interest in 360 wells in the Gulf Coast region, of which Gruy is the operator of approximately 71% of the wells. Magnum Hunter has received an engineering evaluation from D&M on the net reserves in the Gulf Coast. According to D&M, as of December 31, 2004, the Gulf Coast properties had proved reserves of 2.0 MMBbl of oil and 63.7 Bcf of natural gas, or on a natural gas equivalent basis, 75.6 Bcfe. Approximately 84% of the estimated reserves are natural gas and 16% are oil. Total net daily production from the Gulf Coast properties for the month of December 2004 was approximately 20.1 MMcf/d of natural gas and 566 Bbls/d of oil. The principal fields in the onshore Gulf Coast region are Brazil, Buchel, Provident City, Alta Loma and Word, North.
Buchel. Magnum Hunter operates eight producing wells and one salt water disposal well in this Dewitt County, Texas field. Magnum Hunter has an 87.5% working interest in two of the wells and own a 100% working interest in the remaining wells. The producing interval in the Buchel field is the lower cretaceous Edwards formation at approximately 14,000 feet. Production averaged 1,567 Mcf/d and
IV-35
17 Bbl/d in December 2004 net to Magnum Hunter's interest. Net proved reserves for this field were 10.4 Bcfe as of December 31, 2004.
Provident City. Magnum Hunter owns varying working interests, between 2% and 100%, in 15 wells in this field located in Lavaca County, Texas. Five of the wells are Magnum Hunter operated. Production is primarily from the Wilcox formation at 8,500 feet to 17,500 feet. Production attributable to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 1,747 Mcf/d and 9 Bbl/d in December 2004. As of December 31, 2004, the net proved reserves assigned to this field were 5.2 Bcfe.
Alta Loma. Magnum Hunter owns a 41% and a 48% working interest in two producing wells in this field. In addition, Magnum Hunter also owns and operates a salt water disposal well. This field is located in Galveston County, Texas and produces from the Frio formation at approximately 12,500 feet. Production attributable to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 1,925 Mcf/d and 130 Bbl/d in December 2004. As of December 31, 2004, the net proved reserves assigned to this field were 6.5 Bcfe.
Brazil. Magnum Hunter owns varying working interests, between 30% and 50%, in eight producing wells in this field located in McMullen County, Texas. Six of the wells are Magnum Hunter operated. Production is primarily from the Wilcox formation at 9,000 feet to 13,000 feet. Production attributable to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 8,505 Mcfd and 21 Bbl/d in December 2004. Magnum Hunter drilled and completed three new wells in this area in 2004 and is in the process of drilling a fourth. As of December 31, 2004, the net proved reserves assigned to this field were 7.5 Bcfe.
Word, North. Magnum Hunter owns varying working interests, between 4% and 100%, in 21 wells in this field located in Lavaca County, Texas. Eighteen of the wells are operated by Magnum Hunter. Production is from the Edwards formation at approximately 14,000 feet and averaged 1,121 Mcf/d and 17 Bbl/d in December 2004 net to Magnum Hunter's interest. Net proved reserves for this field were 9.5 Bcfe as of December 31, 2004.
Gulf of Mexico
Magnum Hunter's initial entry into the Gulf of Mexico occurred March 27, 1998 when it acquired approximately 40% beneficial ownership interest in TEL Offshore Trust. One year later in May 1999, Magnum Hunter began participating as a working interest owner in new exploratory drilling on the shallow water shelf. Magnum Hunter currently owns an interest in 245 blocks in the Gulf of Mexico ranging from 12.5% to 100%. Proved reserves have been assigned in 55 blocks encompassing 85 gross wells (29.7 net wells). Magnum Hunter operates 16 of these wells (10.1 net wells). According to D&M, as of December 31, 2004, the Gulf of Mexico properties had proved reserves of 3.1 MMBbl of oil and 64.1 Bcf of natural gas (82.6 Bcfe). Approximately 78% of the estimated reserves are natural gas and the remaining 22% is oil. Total net daily production from the Gulf of Mexico properties for the month of December 2004 was 53.4 MMcf/d of natural gas and 2,121 Bbls/d of oil. At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had nine additional discoveries that commenced production in 2005.
Ship Shoal 358. Magnum Hunter owns varying working interests, between 15% and 39.2%, in four wells operated by ATP Oil & Gas. Production is from Upper Pliocene sands at approximately eight to nine thousand feet. The wells are located in Federal waters south of Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana in a water depth of 420 feet. Production from the first well was initiated in March 2004. Subsequent wells were put on production as they were completed. Production from all the wells attributable to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 3,397 Mcfd and 270 Bbls/d in December 2004. As of December 31, 2004, the net proved reserves for Ship Shoal 358 were 5.1 Bcfe.
Vermilion 241. Magnum Hunter's interest in Vermilion 241 consists of a 50% working interest in one well operated by Remington Oil & Gas. Production is from the Bul 1 Sand at approximately 11,000 feet. The field is located in 115 feet of water on Federal leases south of Vermilion Parish,
IV-36
Louisiana. First production was established in July 2004 and averaged 1,850 Mcfd and 56 Bbls/d in December 2004, net to Magnum Hunter's interests. The net proved reserves attributable to this well were 3.7 Bcfe as of December 31, 2004.
West Cameron 458 Area. This area encompasses West Cameron blocks 457 and 458. Magnum Hunter owns a 40% working interest in one subsea completion and four additional wells drilled from the platform located in Block 458. Remington Oil & Gas operates the field which is located in 117 feet of water on Federal leases south of Cameron Parish, Louisiana. The initial well started production in July 2004 with the last well coming on in October 2004. Production is from the Lentic 1 and Basal Nebraskan zones ranging in depths from 7,400 feet to 12,000 feet. Net to Magnum Hunter's interest, production averaged 7,227 Mcfd and 2 Bbls/d in December 2004. Net proved reserves for the West Cameron 458 Area were 3.8 Bcfe as of December 31, 2004.
Main Pass 107. Main Pass 107 is operated by Kerr McGee and is located on Federal leases in 52 feet of water east of Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. Magnum Hunter's ownership consists of a 50% working interest in one well producing from the Tex W 1 at approximately 11,400 feet. The well also has numerous behind pipe recompletion opportunities in zones up to 9,800 feet. First production was established in January 2003. In December 2004, production for the well averaged 1,776 Mcfd and 114 Bbls/d net to Magnum Hunter's interest. As of December 31, 2004, the net proved reserves attributable to this well were 6.0 Bcfe.
Eugene Island 302. Magnum Hunter's interest in Eugene Island 302 consists of a 30% working interest in two producing wells and one shut in well operated by Remington Oil & Gas. Current production is from the Basal Nebraskan zone at approximately 9,000 to 10,000 feet. The field is located in 220 feet of water on Federal leases south of St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. Initial production was established in May 2002. Production attributable to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 391 Mcfd and 329 Bbls/d in December 2004. Net proved reserves for this field were 3.2 Bcfe as of December 31, 2004.
Main Pass 178 Area. This area is comprised of Main Pass blocks 163, 164 and 178 and is located in Federal waters east of Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana in water depths of 124 feet to 150 feet. Magnum Hunter owns a 100% working interest and operates four existing wells from two platforms; and added an additional well and platform in 2003, in which it owns a 60% working interest. First production for the area was established in December 2001. These wells produce from various sands of Lower Pliocene to Middle Miocene age, at depths ranging from 4,800 feet to 12,000. A sidetrack well to the Main Pass 178 A-1 well is planned to be drilled in 2005. Magnum Hunter will retain a 60% interest in this well. Production to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 975 Mcfd and 29 Bbls/d in December 2004. Net proved reserves for the Main Pass 178 Area were 7.9 Bcfe as of December 31, 2004.
South Timbalier 265 Area. This area encompasses South Timbalier blocks 250, 264 and 265 and is located in Federal waters south of Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana in water depths of 185 feet to 225 feet. Magnum Hunter operates eight producing wells and seven shut in wells from five platforms with interests ranging from 40% to 100%. Magnum Hunter initially acquired its interest in South Timbalier 265 though a like-kind property exchange with Kerr McGee in August 2000. Additional interests in the area were acquired from El Paso in March 21. The wells produce from various sands ranging in depth from 4,800 feet to 16,000 feet. Magnum Hunter drilled the South Timbalier 250 A-3 well in 2004 which came on production in January 2005 at an average rate of 2,100 Mcfd net to Magnum Hunter's interest. Production for the area averaged 1,287 Mcfd and 124 Bbls/d in December 2004 prior to this well coming on line. As of December 31, 2004, the net proved reserves for the South Timbalier 265 Area were 7.5 Bcfe.
IV-37
Gas Processing Plants
McLean Plant. In January 1997, Magnum Hunter complemented its Panoma acquisition by purchasing a 50% ownership interest in the McLean Gas Plant and a related 22 mile products pipeline. This plant is a modern cryogenic plant utilizing approximately 2,000 horsepower of high speed compression and a gas processing capacity of approximately 23 MMcf/d. For the month of December 2004, throughput of the plant averaged 6.5 MMcf/d with processed liquids of 426 Bbl/d. The McLean Gas plant keeps 100% of the liquids recovered through the plant and pays the producer a value per Btu for the shrink and residue allocable to each producer's production less a gathering fee, plant and compression fuel and system loss.
Madill Plant. In December 1999, Magnum Hunter acquired the Madill Gas Processing Plant and associated gathering system assets from Dynegy Midstream Services, Limited Partnership, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynegy Inc. The gas processing plant and associated facilities are located in Marshall and Bryan Counties, Oklahoma, and were acquired in conjunction with Magnum Hunter's 50% partner, Carrera Gas Gathering Co., L.L.C., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, who acquired the other 50% of the gas plant and associated assets. The acquisition includes over 130 miles of gas gathering pipelines. This modern cryogenic plant has 3,350 horsepower of high speed compression and has gas processing capacity of approximately 18 MMcf/d. For the month of December 2004, throughput of the plant averaged 7.9 MMcf/d of natural gas with processed liquids of 483 Bbl/d. The Madill Gas Plant processes natural gas under contracts that are primarily percent of proceeds, referred to as POP, based contracts. The contracts' percentages vary depending on volume and producer.
Walker Creek Plant. In conjunction with the Vastar acquisition, Magnum Hunter acquired an approximate 59% ownership interest and became the operator of the Walker Creek Plant and associated gathering system. In 2000, Magnum Hunter sold a 44.2% interest in the Walker Creek Plant to Mallard Hunter L.P., of which Magnum Hunter is the general partner. This facility is located in southwest Arkansas in Lafayette and Columbia counties. This propane refrigeration plant utilizes 3,160 horsepower of leased compression and has a gas processing capacity of 12 Mmcf/d. For the month of December 2004, throughput of the plant net to Magnum Hunter's interest averaged 131 Mcf/d with processed liquids of 7 Bbl/d. The Walker Creek Plant is run for the sole benefit of the Walker Creek Unit. No third party production is delivered into the facility. All residue and NGL proceeds and plant costs are allocated to the Walker Creek Unit.
Elmore City Processing Plant. Magnum Hunter acquired a 100% ownership interest in the Elmore City Plant in the Prize merger. This gas processing facility and associated gathering system assets are located in Garvin County, Oklahoma. These facilities include over 25 miles of gathering pipelines and an NGL extraction plant consisting of a cryogenic unit and approximately 7,000 horsepower of various types of compressors. The plant's 2004 throughput averaged 10.4 MMcf/d with a total throughput capacity of approximately 35 MMcf/d. For the month of December 2004, throughput of the plant averaged 9.8 MMcf/d with processed liquids of 845 Bbl/d. The Elmore City Plant processes natural gas under contracts that are solely POP contracts. The plant receives on average approximately 20% of the residue and 40% to 45% of the recovered liquids attributable to a producer's gas delivered into the system.
General
All information set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding estimated proved reserves and related estimated future net cash flows for Magnum Hunter's oil and gas interests is taken from reports prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton of Dallas, Texas and Cawley Gillespie & Associates, Inc. of Fort Worth, Texas, both independent petroleum engineers with respect to Magnum
IV-38
Hunter's interests at December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 (using oil and gas prices in effect on each respective date).
The estimates of these independent petroleum engineers were based upon their review of production histories and other geological, economic, ownership and engineering data Magnum Hunter provided. Magnum Hunter bears complete responsibility and liability for its reserve estimates.
Net cash flows is defined as net revenues, after deducting production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting federal income taxes. Estimates have been made using constant oil and gas prices and operating costs, at December 31, 2004, or as otherwise indicated.
The estimates of future net cash flows from proved reserves are made using oil and gas sales prices in effect as of the dates of such estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties. Magnum Hunter's estimates of proved reserves and future net cash flows were estimated using the following weighted average prices, before deduction of production taxes:
| |
Prices Used in Reserve Reports at December 31, |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | $ | 5.66 | $ | 5.24 | $ | 4.23 | |||
| Oil (per Bbl) | $ | 41.66 | $ | 31.33 | $ | 29.99 | |||
| NGL | $ | 29.93 | $ | 22.96 | $ | 17.80 | |||
All reserves are evaluated at contract temperature and pressure which can affect the measurement of gas reserves. Operating costs, development costs and certain production related and ad valorem taxes were deducted in arriving at the estimated future net cash flows. No provision was made for income taxes. The estimates following this section set forth reserves considered to be economically recoverable under normal operating methods and existing conditions at the prices and operating costs prevailing at the dates indicated above.
Proved reserves are estimates of oil and gas to be recovered in the future. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating the sizes of underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way. The accuracy of any reserve estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserve reports of other engineers might differ from the reports contained herein. Results of drilling, testing, and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimate. Future prices received for the sale of oil and gas will likely be different from those used in preparing these reports. The amounts and timing of future operating and development costs may also differ from those used. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered.
Except for the effect of changes in oil and gas prices, no major discovery or other favorable or adverse event is believed to have caused a significant change in these estimates of Magnum Hunter's proved reserves since December 31, 2004. No estimates of proved reserves of oil and gas have been filed by Magnum Hunter with, or included in any report to, any United States authority or agency (other than the Securities and Exchange Commission) since January 1, 2001.
Magnum Hunter Reserves
The following tables set forth Magnum Hunter's estimated proved reserves of oil and gas on an actual basis at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. These proved reserves were determined in accordance with Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10(a) (2) (3) (4), which are the only applicable definitions of proved oil and gas reserves.
IV-39
Estimated Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserves(a)
| |
At December 31, |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||
| Net gas reserves (Mcf): | ||||||||
| Proved developed | 442,630,521 | 368,530,450 | 362,325,297 | |||||
| Proved undeveloped | 167,487,550 | 125,522,024 | 96,318,346 | |||||
| Total proved gas reserves | 610,118,071 | 494,052,474 | 458,643,643 | |||||
| Net oil reserves (Bbl): (including condensate) |
||||||||
| Proved developed | 42,441,787 | 38,260,657 | 40,786,302 | |||||
| Proved undeveloped | 17,302,268 | 13,920,319 | 13,885,296 | |||||
| Total proved oil reserves | 59,744,055 | 52,180,976 | 54,671,598 | |||||
| Net NGL reserves (Bbl) (including condensate) |
||||||||
| Proved developed | 5,566,810 | 4,728,119 | 7,726,147 | |||||
| Proved undeveloped | 770,280 | 488,364 | 684,241 | |||||
| Total proved NGL reserves | 6,337,090 | 5,216,483 | 8,410,388 | |||||
| Total Proved Reserves (Mcfe) | 1,006,604,941 | 838,437,228 | 837,135,559 | |||||
- (a)
- Based upon reserve reports at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 prepared by D&M and Cawley Gillespie.
The following tables set forth the estimated proved reserves of oil and gas included in the previous tables which are claimed exclusively through Magnum Hunter's gas plant ownership.
IV-40
Estimated Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserves(a)
(Through Gas Plant Ownership)
| |
At December 31, |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||
| Net gas reserves (Mcf): | ||||||||
| Proved developed | 9,418,512 | 9,162,200 | 8,030,900 | |||||
| Proved undeveloped | 350,349 | 351,100 | 328,400 | |||||
| Total proved gas reserves | 9,768,861 | 9,513,300 | 8,359,300 | |||||
| Net oil reserves (Bbl): (including condensate) |
||||||||
| Proved developed | 126,598 | 166,800 | 121,600 | |||||
| Proved undeveloped | 9,298 | 30,400 | 5,600 | |||||
| Total proved oil reserves | 135,896 | 197,200 | 127,200 | |||||
| Net NGL reserves (Bbl) (including condensate) |
||||||||
| Proved developed | 4,398,390 | 3,637,100 | 4,179,700 | |||||
| Proved undeveloped | 550,016 | 452,600 | 349,100 | |||||
| Total proved NGL reserves | 4,948,406 | 4,089,700 | 4,528,800 | |||||
| Total Proved Reserves (Mcfe) | 40,274,673 | 35,234,700 | 36,295,300 | |||||
- (a)
- Based upon reserve reports at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 prepared by D&M.
Significant Properties
On December 31, 2004, 100% of Magnum Hunter's proved reserves on a Bcfe basis were located in the Mid-Continent region, the Permian Basin, the Gulf Coast region and the Gulf of Mexico. On such date, Magnum Hunter's properties included working interests in 5,455 gross (3,641 net) productive oil and gas wells.
The following table sets forth summary information with respect to Magnum Hunter's estimated proved reserves of oil and gas at December 31, 2004.
| |
Proved Reserves |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Oil (Bbl) |
Gas (Mcf) |
NGL (Bbl) |
Natural Gas Equivalent (Mcfe) |
|||||
| Mid-Continent region(a) | 5,793,128 | 182,819,743 | 6,337,090 | 255,601,051 | |||||
| Permian Basin-New Mexico region(a) | 8,247,951 | 184,159,914 | — | 233,647,620 | |||||
| Permian Basin-Texas region | 40,630,590 | 115,364,687 | — | 359,148,227 | |||||
| Gulf Coast region(a) | 1,984,696 | 63,696,822 | — | 75,604,998 | |||||
| Gulf of Mexico(a) | 3,087,690 | 64,076,905 | — | 82,603,045 | |||||
| Total | 59,744,055 | 610,118,071 | 6,337,090 | 1,006,604,941 | |||||
- (a)
- Based on reserve reports at December 31, 2004 prepared by D&M and Cawley Gillespie.
IV-41
Oil and Gas Production, Prices and Costs
The following table shows the approximate net production attributable to Magnum Hunters' oil and gas interests, the average sales price and the average production expense attributable to Magnum Hunter's oil and gas production for the periods indicated. Production and sales information relating to properties acquired or disposed of is reflected in this table only since or up to the closing date of their respective acquisition or sale and may affect the comparability of the data between the periods presented.
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| Oil and gas production: | |||||||||||
| Oil (Mbbl) | 4,080 | 3,893 | 3,875 | ||||||||
| Gas (MMcf) | 55,961 | 49,695 | 47,683 | ||||||||
| Natural Gas Equivalent (MMcfe) | 80,442 | 73,052 | 70,933 | ||||||||
| Average sales price(a): | |||||||||||
| Before Hedge Contracts: | |||||||||||
| Oil (per Bbl) | $ | 39.62 | $ | 29.62 | $ | 25.18 | |||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | 5.82 | 4.89 | 3.07 | ||||||||
| Natural Gas Equivalents (per Mcfe) | 6.06 | 4.91 | 3.45 | ||||||||
| After Hedge Contracts: | |||||||||||
| Oil (per Bbl) | $ | 34.27 | $ | 26.42 | $ | 24.04 | |||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | 5.41 | 3.66 | 3.10 | ||||||||
| Natural Gas Equivalent (per Mcfe) | 5.50 | 3.90 | 3.40 | ||||||||
| Oil and gas production lifting costs (per Mcfe) | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 0.72 | |||||
| Production taxes and other costs (per Mcfe)(b) | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.40 | |||||
- (a)
- Before
deduction of production taxes and net of hedging results.
- (b)
- Includes ad valorem taxes, insurance, bonds, company overhead and net profits interest.
IV-42
The following table sets forth the results of Magnum Hunter's drilling activities during the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
| |
|
Gross Wells(a) |
Net Wells(b) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year |
Type of Well |
|||||||||||||
| Total |
Producing(c) |
Dry(d) |
Total |
Producing(c) |
Dry(d) |
|||||||||
| 2004 | Exploratory | |||||||||||||
| Texas | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0 | ||||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico | 32 | 26 | 6 | 12.10 | 9.86 | 2.24 | ||||||||
| Development | ||||||||||||||
| Texas | 89 | 89 | 0 | 35.19 | 35.19 | 0 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1.21 | 0.97 | 0.24 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 34 | 34 | 0 | 16.09 | 16.09 | 0 | ||||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2.35 | 2.35 | 0 | ||||||||
| 2003 | Exploratory | |||||||||||||
| Texas | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.33 | 0.27 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0 | ||||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico | 21 | 14 | 7 | 8.86 | 6.51 | 2.35 | ||||||||
| Development | ||||||||||||||
| Texas | 64 | 63 | 1 | 27.29 | 26.41 | 0.88 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 25 | 25 | 0 | 12.62 | 12.62 | 0 | ||||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0 | ||||||||
| 2002 | Exploratory | |||||||||||||
| Texas | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 0.3 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 0 | ||||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico and Other | 21 | 16 | 5 | 6.24 | 4.82 | 1.42 | ||||||||
| Development | ||||||||||||||
| Texas | 62 | 61 | 1 | 23.01 | 22.01 | 1 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 16 | 16 | 0 | 5.20 | 5.20 | 0 | ||||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico and Other | 14 | 14 | 0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | ||||||||
- (a)
- The
number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.
- (b)
- The
number of net wells is the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.
- (c)
- A
producing well is an exploratory or development well found to be capable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.
- (d)
- A dry well is an exploratory or development well that is not a producing well.
IV-43
The following table sets forth the number of oil and natural gas wells in which Magnum Hunter had a working interest at December 31, 2004. All of these wells are located in the United States.
| |
Productive Wells As of December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Gross(a) |
Net(b) |
|||||||||||
| Location |
|||||||||||||
| Oil |
Gas |
Total |
Oil |
Gas |
Total |
||||||||
| Texas | 2,295 | 1,228 | 3,523 | 1,644.85 | 867.24 | 2,512.09 | |||||||
| New Mexico | 421 | 629 | 1,050 | 292.73 | 378.84 | 671.57 | |||||||
| Oklahoma | 196 | 484 | 680 | 151.39 | 247.82 | 399.21 | |||||||
| Louisiana | 8 | 8 | 16 | 4.96 | 4.51 | 9.47 | |||||||
| Arkansas | 59 | 1 | 60 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.80 | |||||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico | 9 | 102 | 111 | 1.13 | 39.83 | 40.96 | |||||||
| Other | 1 | 14 | 15 | 0.06 | 4.87 | 4.93 | |||||||
| Total | 2,989 | 2,466 | 5,455 | 2,097.92 | 1,543.11 | 3,641.03 | |||||||
- (a)
- The
number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned. Well counts include wells with multiple completions. Fluid injection wells for waterflood
and other enhanced recovery projects are not included as gross wells.
- (b)
- The number of net wells is the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.
The following table summarizes Magnum Hunter's developed and undeveloped leasehold acreage at December 31, 2004:
| |
Developed |
Undeveloped |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Gross(a) |
Net(b) |
Gross(a) |
Net(b) |
|||||
| Arizona | — | — | 920,217 | 920,217 | |||||
| Kansas | 10,377 | 6,873 | 480 | 480 | |||||
| Louisiana | 472 | 283 | — | — | |||||
| New Mexico | 190,108 | 77,429 | 1,698,877 | 1,635,409 | |||||
| Oklahoma | 168,149 | 105,098 | 22,042 | 12,873 | |||||
| Texas | 351,694 | 200,588 | 136,585 | 85,897 | |||||
| Utah | 8,063 | 8,063 | 87,106 | 87,106 | |||||
| Wyoming | 25,775 | 25,555 | 2,720 | 2,720 | |||||
| Offshore Gulf of Mexico | 292,903 | 111,368 | 829,877 | 491,375 | |||||
| Other | 8,087 | 3,045 | 6,772 | 4,178 | |||||
| Total | 1,055,628 | 538,302 | 3,704,676 | 3,240,255 | |||||
- (a)
- The
number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which a working interest is owned.
- (b)
- The number of net acres is the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.
Substantially all of Magnum Hunter's interests are leasehold working interests or overriding royalty interests (as opposed to mineral or fee interests) under standard onshore oil and gas leases. As is customary in the industry, Magnum Hunter generally acquire oil and gas acreage without any warranty of title except as to claims made by, through or under the transferor. Although Magnum Hunter has
IV-44
title examined by a landman or title attorney prior to acquisition of mineral acreage in those cases in which the economic significance of the acreage justifies the cost, there can be no assurance that losses will not result from title defects or from defects in the assignment of leasehold rights. In certain instances, title opinions may not be obtained if, in Magnum Hunter's judgment, it would be uneconomical or impractical to do so. Magnum Hunter anticipates no material expirations on any of its leased acreage over the next three years.
Development and Exploration Activities
Overview
Magnum Hunter seeks to minimize its overhead and capital expenditures by subcontracting the drilling, redrilling and workover of wells to independent drilling contractors and by outsourcing other services. Magnum Hunter typically compensates its drilling subcontractors on a turnkey (fixed price), footage or day-rate basis depending on its assessment of risk and cost considerations on each individual project.
Development Drilling
Magnum Hunter's development strategy focuses on maximizing the value and productivity of its oil and gas asset base through development drilling and enhanced recovery projects. Magnum Hunter has budgeted approximately $96.8 million for exploitation and development activities for 2005 with $67.4 million of such budget allocated to its proved undeveloped reserves. Magnum Hunter has identified 976 development drilling locations and workover opportunities on its properties to which proved reserves have been attributed. In exploiting its producing properties, Magnum Hunter relies upon its in-house technical staff of petroleum engineering and geological professionals and utilize the services of outside consultants on a selective basis.
Mid-Continent Region. A total of 194 development drilling locations and workover opportunities have been identified in the Mid-Continent Region. Increased density drilling will continue to enhance the value of the Panoma Prospect. Approximately 92 drilling locations have been identified as proven, many of which were reclassified as proven in late 2003 when Magnum Hunter received regulatory approval to reclassify its westernmost Panoma acreage. Spacing for those units was changed from 640 acres to 160 acres per well.
Additional Mid-Continent development opportunities center around recompletion opportunities in the Eola-Robberson, North Madill, Cumberland and Walnut Bend Fields. All of these fields are large, multi-pay fields with a large well count. Approximately 116 recompletion opportunities have been identified in those four fields.
Permian Basin Properties. Magnum Hunter has maintained a continuous two-rig drilling program in Southeast New Mexico for over two years. A third operated rig was added in September of 2004 with the closing of the Encana acquisition. Target reservoirs are Morrow, Atoka and Strawn at depths down to 13,000 feet. The majority of the wells drilled have been increased density wells. Primary fields drilled in 2004 and scheduled for 2005 are White City and South Carlsbad in Eddy County and the Quail Ridge in Lea County. A total of 23 operated wells are budgeted for 2005. Magnum Hunter's working interest ranges from 24% to 100%, with an average in the 70% range. Most of the drilling through February 2005 has been on acreage acquired in the Burlington, Mallon and Encana acquisitions. Magnum Hunter recently entered into two separate agreements with ConocoPhillips which allows Magnum Hunter to participate in wells drilled on ConocoPhillips acreage in the High Lonesome area. Additional similar farmouts are in the various stages with other large producers in the general area.
IV-45
Additional development drilling in the Permian Basin centers around increased density drilling in the Westbrook Field in Mitchell County, Texas, where Magnum Hunter drilled 11 wells in 2004. Over 100 Spraberry and Canyon locations were identified with the NG Tex acquisition that was closed in 2004. Several well sidetrack recompletions are planned for the Brunson Ranch Field in Loving County, Texas with one budgeted for 2005. Also numerous proven undeveloped locations have been identified in Lea County, New Mexico targeting the shallow intervals down to approximately 3,000 feet.
Magnum Hunter spent $52.7 million of its $540 million 2004 capital expenditures on exploratory drilling and related land and geophysical costs. Thirty-two offshore exploratory wells were drilled in 2004, of which 26 were completed as producing wells providing Magnum Hunter with a 81% success rate. Magnum Hunter entered the Gulf of Mexico as a working interest owner in new exploratory drilling on the shallow water shelf in May 1999. This program has yielded 82 completions in 104 attempts by the end of 2004, and as the proved reserves associated with these new wells are developed, they have been adding significant cash flow. Production from Magnum Hunter's producing blocks was approximately 66.1 MMcfe/d net to Magnum Hunter as of December 2004. Nine new wells scheduled to commence production in the first half of 2005 should add to these levels. Magnum Hunter currently owns an interest ranging from 12.5% to 100% in 245 offshore blocks and expect to add to the number of OCS blocks in 2005. An aggressive drilling program will continue in 2005.
The onshore exploration program remains active. One of the Morrow tests drilled in New Mexico was a true exploratory test in which Magnum Hunter held a 100% working interest. The well found gas in the Morrow, as well as from the Strawn zone. Magnum Hunter participated in additional exploration in West Texas on successful projects with Oxy Oil and Gas and EOG Resources.
Gathering and Processing of Gas
Hunter Gas Gathering, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magnum Hunter, owns five gas gathering systems located in Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and Arkansas, none of which are subject to regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, referred to as FERC, and has ownership interests in four gas processing plants. Gruy operates all of the gas gathering systems and two of the gas processing plants.
Generally, the gathering systems transport the natural gas from wells to a common point where it is dehydrated prior to redelivery to downstream pipelines. In managing its gas gathering systems, Magnum Hunter has emphasized operating efficiency and overhead management and introduced a program in certain areas which ties throughput costs to volume transported rather than to compression capacity. Magnum Hunter believes that its focus on volume-based pricing reduces the potential financial impact of a decline in actual throughput. Since most of the compression costs are not fixed, but are tied to volumes transported, the compression operator has an incentive to ensure compression is appropriately sized to gain compression efficiency and to minimize compressor downtime so that as much volume is being transported as possible. The lower the volume transported, the lower the fee to the compression operator, and in some situations, the compression operator incurs a penalty.
The Panoma system, the largest of Magnum Hunter's gas gathering systems, consists of approximately 455 miles of pipeline. The main trunk lines run east to west for approximately 66 miles with the east end starting in Beckham County, Oklahoma and the west end starting in Gray County, Texas. For the year ending December 31, 2004, gas throughput for the Panoma gas gathering system averaged 15.2 MMcf/d. The Panoma gas gathering system is connected to a third party header system which provides access to multiple major interstate and intrastate pipelines in the area serving Midwestern, Western and Oklahoma markets. Magnum Hunter operates approximately 523 of the
IV-46
approximately 610 wells connected to the Panoma system, and is actively seeking to add new wells to this system through acquisition, development or arrangements with third party producers.
Effective January 1997, Magnum Hunter purchased a 50% ownership interest in the McLean Gas Plant, a gas processing facility located adjacent to its Panoma gas gathering system. The purchase also included a 22 mile products pipeline between the McLean Gas Plant and the Koch Pipeline at Lefors, Texas and all gas and product purchase and sales agreements related to the plant. The McLean Gas Plant is a modern cryogenic gas processing plant with a throughput capacity of 23.0 MMcf/d. For the year ending December 31, 2004, throughput net to Hunter Gas Gathering, was approximately 7.01 MMcf/d with processed liquids of 468 Bbl/d. Magnum Hunter acquired its 50% ownership interest in the plant from Carrera Gas Company, L.L.C., referred to as Carrera, of Tulsa, Oklahoma, which owns the remaining 50% of the plant and is plant operator.
Magnum Hunter acquired a 100% ownership interest in the Elmore City Plant in the Prize merger. This gas processing facility and associated gathering system assets are located in Garvin County, Oklahoma. The facilities include over 25 miles of gathering pipelines and an NGL extraction plant consisting of a cryogenic unit and approximately 7,000 horsepower of various types of compression. For the year ending December 31, 2004, the plant's 2004 throughput averaged 10.4 MMcf/d with 942 Bbls/d of processed liquids. The plant has a total throughput capacity of approximately 35 MMcf/d.
In December 1999, Magnum Hunter acquired the Madill Gas Processing Plant and associated gathering system assets from Dynegy Midstream Services, Limited Partnership, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynegy Inc. The gas processing plant and associated facilities are located in Marshall and Bryan Counties, Oklahoma and were acquired in conjunction with its 50% partner, Carrera. The acquisition includes over 130 miles of gas gathering pipelines. This modern cryogenic plant has 3,350 horsepower of high-speed compression and has gas processing capacity of approximately 18 MMcf/d. For the year ending December 31, 2004, throughput of the plant, net to Hunter Gas Gathering, averaged 8.03 MMcf/d of natural gas with processed liquids of 493 Bbls/d.
In conjunction with the Vastar acquisition, Magnum Hunter acquired approximately 59% ownership interest and became the operator of the Walker Creek Plant and associated gathering system. In 2000, Magnum Hunter sold a 44.2% interest in the Walker Creek Plant to Mallard Hunter L.P., of which Magnum Hunter is the general partner. This facility is located in southwest Arkansas in Lafayette and Columbia counties. This propane refrigeration plant utilizes 3,160 horsepower leased compression and has a gas processing capacity of 12 MMcf/d. The Walker Creek Plant is run for the sole benefit of the Walker Creek Unit. There is not any third party production delivering into the facility nor is the facility set up as a separate business unit. All residue and NGL proceeds and plant costs are allocated to the Walker Creek Unit. For the year ending December 31, 2004, throughput of the plant, net to Magnum Hunter's interest, averaged 0.157 MMcf/d with processed liquids of 8 Bbls/d.
In the second half of 2004, Hunter Gas Gathering began construction of the White City Gathering System, located 5 miles southeast of the White City Penn Field in Eddy County New Mexico. The system will initially service a 12-section area under development by Magnum Hunter's production company, Magnum Hunter Production, Inc. in an area previously lacking any pipeline infrastructure for getting as to markets. This system was put into service in October 2004 and development of this area is progressing with three wells connected and flowing and others in stages of drilling or completion. There are 32 potential locations identified for service by the White City System. There is no processing expected in this area due to the dry nature of the gas. The system is currently connected to one downstream gatherer with the potential for two interconnects to move gas into the interstate markets. For the month of December 2004, throughput on the system was 1.9 MMcf/d.
The Baker Gas Gathering System was constructed and put into service in August 2004. Hunter Gas Gathering is the operator of the system and owns a 50% interest with Rutherford Oil Corporation owning the remaining interest. It consists of approximately 19,500 feet of 8" pipeline located in
IV-47
McMullen County, Texas and provides an outlet for multiple wells to Houston Pipe Line's 16" line to the South. Initial production from each well is estimated in the range of 8-15 MMcf/d with 3 wells connected and flowing. For the month of December 2004, throughput on the system, net to Hunter Gas Gathering, averaged 3.3 MMcf/d.
Magnum Hunter markets all of its gas production as well as gas it purchases from third parties to gas marketing firms or end-users either on (i) the spot market under contracts of less than one year at prevailing spot market prices (approximately 75% of Magnum Hunter's volume) or (ii) at market responsive prices under multi-year contracts (approximately 25% of Magnum Hunter's volume). Marketing gas for Magnum Hunter's own account exposes it to the attendant commodities risk which Magnum Hunter attempts to mitigate through various financial hedges. Magnum Hunter normally sells its own oil under month-to-month contracts with a variety of crude oil purchasers. Oil is usually sold for Magnum Hunter's own account through the services of Enmark Services, a marketing agent in Dallas, Texas. While Magnum Hunter has historically been able to sell oil above posted prices, it is also exposed to the commodities risk inherent in short-term contracts which it attempts to mitigate through various financial hedges. For a discussion of Magnum Hunter's hedging activities, see "Chapter IV—Magnum Hunter Business and Financial Information—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Hedging Activity" and Note 12 to Magnum Hunter's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The market for oil and natural gas Magnum Hunter produces depends on factors beyond its control, including the extent of domestic production and imports of oil and natural gas, the proximity and capacity of natural gas pipelines and other transportation facilities, weather, demand for oil and natural gas, the marketing of competitive fuels and the effects of state and federal regulation. The oil and natural gas industry also competes with other industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial and individual consumers.
Petroleum Management and Consulting Services
Magnum Hunter acquired Gruy in December 1995. Gruy, which conducts operations for both Magnum Hunter and third parties, has managed properties for nearly half a century for financial institutions, bankruptcy trustees, estates, individual investors, trusts and independent oil and gas companies. Gruy provides drilling, completion and other well-site services; advice regarding environmental and other regulatory compliance; receipt and disbursement functions, expert witness testimony and other managerial services and petroleum engineering services. Gruy manages, operates and provides consulting services on oil and gas properties, gathering systems and processing plants located in Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Louisiana, New Mexico and Kansas. Gruy is an important component of Magnum Hunter's acquisition program. As the operator of wells for third parties and as a provider of consulting services for the energy industry, Gruy is often uniquely able to identify attractive acquisition opportunities.
Magnum Hunter acquired an 80% controlling interest in Metrix Networks, Inc., referred to as Metrix, in December 2003. Metrix provides equipment and monitoring services to companies in the energy industry.
For additional information on Magnum Hunter's business segments, see Note 15 to Magnum Hunter's consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
IV-48
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. Magnum Hunter's competitors include major oil companies, other independent oil and gas concerns, and individual producers and operators, many of which have substantially greater financial resources and larger staffs and facilities than those of Magnum Hunter. In addition, Magnum Hunter frequently encounters competition in the acquisition of oil and gas properties, gas gathering systems, gas processing plants and in Magnum Hunter's management and consulting business. The principal means of such competition are the amount and terms of the consideration offered. The principal means of such competition with respect to the sale of oil and gas production are product availability and price. The price at which Magnum Hunter's products may be sold will continue to be affected by a number of factors, including the price of alternate fuels such as oil, natural gas, nuclear power, hydroelectric power and coal, and competition among various gas producers and marketers.
General Federal and State Regulations
There have been, and continue to be, numerous federal and state laws and regulations governing the oil and gas industry that are often changed in response to the current political or economic environment. Compliance with this regulatory burden is often difficult and costly and may carry substantial penalties for noncompliance. The following are some specific regulations that may affect Magnum Hunter. Magnum Hunter cannot predict the impact of these or future legislative or regulatory initiatives.
Regulation of Natural Gas and Oil Exploration and Production
Magnum Hunter's operations are subject to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local levels. Such regulation includes requiring permits for drilling wells, maintaining bonding requirements in order to drill or operate wells and regulating the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled, the plugging and abandoning of wells and the disposal of fluids used in connection with operations. Magnum Hunter's operations are also subject to various conservation laws and regulations. These include the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or proration units and the density of wells which may be drilled in and the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of gas and impose certain requirements regarding the ratability of production. The effect of these regulations may limit the amount of oil and gas Magnum Hunter can produce from its wells and may limit the number of wells or the locations at which Magnum Hunter can drill. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry increases Magnum Hunter's cost of doing business and, consequently, affects its profitability. In as much as such laws and regulations are frequently expanded, amended and reinterpreted, Magnum Hunter is unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such regulations.
Federal Regulation of Sales Prices and Transportation
Currently, there are no federal, state or local laws that regulate the price for sales of Magnum Hunter's natural gas, NGLs, crude oil or condensate. However, the rates charged and terms and conditions for the movement of gas in interstate commerce through certain intrastate pipelines and production area hubs are subject to regulation under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, referred to as NGPA. Pipeline and hub construction activities are, to a limited extent, also subject to regulations under the Natural Gas Act of 1938, referred to as NGA. While these controls do not apply directly to Magnum Hunter, their effect on natural gas markets can be significant in terms of competition and cost
IV-49
of transportation services. Additional proposals and proceedings that might affect the natural gas industry are considered from time to time by Congress, FERC, state regulatory bodies and the courts. Magnum Hunter cannot predict when or if any such proposals might become effective and their effect, if any, on Magnum Hunter's operations. Historically, the natural gas industry has been heavily regulated; therefore, there is no assurance that the less stringent regulatory approach recently pursued by FERC, Congress and the states will continue indefinitely into the future.
Gathering Regulations
State regulation of gathering facilities generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take requirements. Such regulation has not generally been applied against gatherers of natural gas, although natural gas gathering may receive greater regulatory scrutiny in the future. Magnum Hunter's operations on federal, state or Indian oil and gas leases are subject to numerous restrictions, including nondiscrimination statutes. Such operations must be conducted pursuant to certain on-site security regulations and other permits and authorizations issued by the Bureau of Land Management, Minerals Management Service and other agencies.
Environmental Regulation
Magnum Hunter's exploration, development, and production of oil and gas, including its operation of saltwater injection and disposal wells, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Such laws and regulations can increase the costs of planning, designing, installing and operating oil and gas wells. Magnum Hunter's domestic activities are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations, including but not limited to, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, referred to as OPA, the Clean Water Act, referred to as CWA, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, referred to as CERCLA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, referred to as RCRA, the Clean Air Act, referred to as CAA, and the Safe Drinking Water Act, referred to as SDWA, as well as state regulations promulgated under comparable state statutes. Magnum Hunter is also subject to regulations governing the handling, transportation, storage, and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive materials that are found in its oil and gas operations. Civil and criminal fines and penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. Additionally, these laws and regulations require the acquisition of permits or other governmental authorizations before undertaking certain activities, limit or prohibit other activities because of protected areas or species, and impose substantial liabilities for cleanup of pollution.
Under the OPA, a release of oil into water or other areas designated by the statute could result in Magnum Hunter being held responsible for the costs of remediating such a release, certain OPA specified damages, and natural resource damages. The extent of that liability could be extensive, as set forth in the statute, depending on the nature of the release. A release of oil in harmful quantities or other materials into water or other specified areas could also result in Magnum Hunter being held responsible under the CWA for the costs of remediation, and civil and criminal fines and penalties.
CERCLA and comparable state statutes, also known as "Superfund" laws, can impose joint and several and retroactive liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons for the release of a "hazardous substance" into the environment. In practice, cleanup costs are usually allocated among various responsible parties. Potentially liable parties include site owners or operators, past owners or operators under certain conditions, and entities that arrange for the disposal or treatment of, or transport hazardous substances found at the site. Although CERCLA, as amended, currently exempts petroleum, including but not limited to, crude oil, gas and natural gas liquids from the definition of hazardous substance, Magnum Hunter's operations may involve the use or handling of other materials that may be classified as hazardous substances under CERCLA. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the exemption will be preserved in future amendments of the act, if any.
IV-50
RCRA and comparable state and local requirements impose standards for the management, including treatment, storage, and disposal of both hazardous and nonhazardous solid wastes. Magnum Hunter generates hazardous and nonhazardous solid waste in connection with its routine operations. From time to time, proposals have been made that would reclassify certain oil and gas wastes, including wastes generated during drilling, production and pipeline operations, as "hazardous wastes" under RCRA which would make such solid wastes subject to much more stringent handling, transportation, storage, disposal, and clean-up requirements. This development could have a significant impact on Magnum Hunter's operating costs. While state laws vary on this issue, state initiatives to further regulate oil and gas wastes could have a similar impact.
Because oil and gas exploration and production, and possibly other activities, have been conducted at some of Magnum Hunter's properties by previous owners and operators, materials from these operations remain on some of the properties and in some instances require remediation. In addition, in certain instances Magnum Hunter has agreed to indemnify sellers of producing properties from which it has acquired reserves against certain liabilities for environmental claims associated with such properties. While Magnum Hunter does not believe that costs to be incurred by it for compliance and remediating previously or currently owned or operated properties will be material, there can be no guarantee that such costs will not result in material expenditures.
Additionally, in the course of Magnum Hunter's routine oil and gas operations, surface spills and leaks, including casing leaks, of oil or other materials occur, and Magnum Hunter incurs costs for waste handling and environmental compliance. Moreover, Magnum Hunter is able to control directly the operations of only those wells for which it acts as the operator. Management believes that Magnum Hunter is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations.
It is not anticipated that Magnum Hunter will be required in the near future to expend amounts that are material in relation to its total capital expenditures program by reason of environmental laws and regulations, but inasmuch as such laws and regulations are frequently changed, Magnum Hunter is unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance. There can be no assurance that more stringent laws and regulations protecting the environment will not be adopted or that Magnum Hunter will not otherwise incur material expenses in connection with environmental laws and regulations in the future.
At December 31, 2004, Magnum Hunter had 262 full-time employees of which 62 were management, 118 were administrative and 82 were field personnel. None of Magnum Hunter's employees are represented by a union. Management considers Magnum Hunter's relations with employees to be very good.
Magnum Hunter occupies approximately 23,386 square feet of office space at 600 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Suite 1100, Irving, Texas, under a lease that expires in November 2005. Magnum Hunter also occupies approximately 19,635 square feet of office space in Grapevine, Texas, under a lease that expires in December 2005. Magnum Hunter own field offices and production yards in Shamrock, Gainesville and Victoria, Texas; Cumberland and Madill, Oklahoma; Carlsbad, New Mexico; and Taylor, Arkansas. Magnum Hunter also leases field production offices in Midland, Kermit and Abilene, Texas; Artesia and Eunice, New Mexico; and Oklahoma City and Woodward, Oklahoma.
Except as otherwise described in "Chapter I—The Merger—The Merger—Legal Proceedings Related to the Merger," no legal proceedings are pending other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to Magnum Hunter's business, the outcome of which management believes will not have a material adverse effect on Magnum Hunter.
IV-51
The following table sets forth the directors of Magnum Hunter and their ages. Magnum Hunter's Bylaws divide the Board of Directors into three (3) classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms, with one class to be elected at each annual meeting. Assuming that the stockholders of Cimarex approve the proposal to amend the Cimarex charter to increase the maximum size of its board of directors from nine to ten directors, one current member of the Magnum Hunter board of directors will be selected by Cimarex before the effective time of the merger to serve on the Cimarex board of directors after the merger.
| Name |
Age |
Title |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerry Box | 66 | Chairman of the Board | ||
| Gary C. Evans | 47 | Director | ||
| Gerald W. Bolfing | 76 | Director | ||
| Donald A. Erickson | 61 | Director | ||
| Matthew C. Lutz | 70 | Director | ||
| Jody Powers | 58 | Director | ||
| John H. Trescot, Jr. | 80 | Director | ||
| F. Walker Tucei, Jr. | 62 | Director |
Jerry Box has served as Chairman of Magnum Hunter since October 2004, and as director since March 1999. From February 1998 to March 1999, he served in the position of president and chief operating officer and as a director of Oryx Energy Company, now owned by Kerr McGee Corporation. From December 1995 to February 1998, he was executive vice president and chief operating officer of Oryx. From December 1994 through November 1995, he served as executive vice president, exploration and production of Oryx. Previously, he served as senior vice president, exploration and production of Oryx. Mr. Box attended Louisiana Tech University, where he received B.S. and M.S. degrees in geology, and is also a graduate of the Program for Management Development at the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Box served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force from 1961 to 1966. Mr. Box is a former member of the Policy Committee of the U.S. Department of the Interior's Outer Continental Shelf Advisory Board, past chairman and vice-chairman of the American Petroleum Institute's Exploration Affairs subcommittee, a former president of the Dallas Petroleum Club and a member of the Independent Petroleum Association of America.
Gary C. Evans has been a director of Magnum Hunter since December 1995. He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Magnum Hunter from December 1995 until April 2005 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of all of the Magnum Hunter subsidiaries since their formation or acquisition until April 2005. In 1985, Mr. Evans formed the predecessor company, Hunter Resources, Inc., that was merged into and formed Magnum Hunter some ten years later. From 1981 to 1985, Mr. Evans was associated with the Mercantile Bank of Canada where he held various positions including Vice President and Manager of the Energy Division of the Southwestern United States. From 1978 to 1981, he served in various capacities with National Bank of Commerce (now BancTexas, N.A.) including Credit Manager and Credit Officer. Mr. Evans serves on the Board of Directors of Novavax, Inc., a NASDAQ listed pharmaceutical company. He additionally serves on the board of two private Texas-based companies that Magnum Hunter owns an interest in, including (i) Swanson Consulting Services, Inc., a geological consulting firm and (ii) Metrix Networks, Inc., a company that provides web-enabled automation to the oil and natural gas industry. He also serves as a Trustee of TEL Offshore Trust, a NASDAQ listed oil and gas trust of which Magnum Hunter owns an approximate 29% interest. Mr. Evans also serves on the Board of Advisors of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University.
IV-52
Gerald W. Bolfing has been a director of Magnum Hunter since December 1995. Mr. Bolfing was appointed a director of Hunter Resources, Inc. in August 1993. He is an investor in the oil and gas business and a past officer of one of Hunter's former subsidiaries. From 1962 to 1980, Mr. Bolfing was a partner in Bolfing Food Stores in Waco, Texas. Mr. Bolfing was involved in American Service Company in Atlanta, Georgia from 1964 to 1965, and was active with Cable Advertising Systems, Inc. of Kerrville, Texas from 1978 to 1981. He joined a Hunter subsidiary in the well servicing business in 1981 where he remained active until its divestiture in 1992. Mr. Bolfing is on the board of directors of Capital Marketing Corporation of Hurst, Texas.
Donald A. Erickson has served as a Director of Magnum Hunter since February 3, 2004. Mr. Erickson spent nearly 20 years with Ernst & Young, LLC in their corporate finance group. During his career at Ernst & Young, he was the National Director of Valuation and the market leader for the Southwest Region Valuation Practice. Mr. Erickson's responsibilities included the valuation of business interests and intangible assets. Prior to his tenure at Ernst & Young. Mr. Erickson was a Vice President for two national valuation firms and served as an officer in the United States Army. He retired from Ernst & Young in June 2003. Currently, Mr. Erickson is the President of Erickson Partners, LLC, a valuation consulting and financial advisory firm. A 1965 graduate of Santa Clara University, with a B.S.C. degree, Mr. Erickson holds an M.B.A. degree from the University of Oregon. He is a graduate of the Ernst & Young Kellog Executive Program at Northwestern University. Mr. Erickson is an Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA) with the American Society of Appraisers and has served as the National Chairman of its Business Valuation Committee.
Matthew C. Lutz retired as chairman of Magnum Hunter on September 1, 2001 after having served in that capacity since March 1997, and after having previously served as vice chairman of Magnum Hunter from December 1995 to March 1997. Mr. Lutz also previously served as executive vice president of Magnum Hunter from December 1995 to September 2001. Mr. Lutz held similar positions with Hunter Resources, Inc. from September 1993 until October 1996. From 1984 through 1992, Mr. Lutz was senior vice president of exploration and a director of Enserch Exploration, Inc., with responsibility for its worldwide oil and gas exploration and development program. Prior to joining Enserch, Mr. Lutz spent 28 years with Getty Oil Company. He advanced through several technical, supervisory and managerial positions, which gave him various responsibilities, including exploration, production, lease acquisition, administration and financial planning.
Jody Powers has served as a Director of Magnum Hunter since September of 2003. Mr. Powers spent 34 years of his career with Halliburton Company and various subsidiaries with increasing levels of domestic and international management responsibilities, culminating with his retirement in May 2002, holding the executive position of President of Halliburton Energy Services. A 1968 graduate of the University of Houston, Mr. Powers is a current member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the 25 Year Club of the Petroleum Industry.
John H. Trescot, Jr. has served as a director of Magnum Hunter since June 1997. Mr. Trescot is the principal of AWA Management Corporation, a consulting firm specializing in project evaluation. Mr. Trescot began his professional career as an engineer with Shell Oil Company. Later, Mr. Trescot joined Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. (now a part of Georgia-Pacific Corp.), where he served 19 years in various positions in woodlands and pulp and paper, advancing to the position of senior vice president for its Southern Operations. Mr. Trescot then became vice president of The Charter Company, a multi-billion dollar corporation with operations in oil, communications and insurance. In 1979, Mr. Trescot became the chief executive officer of JARI, a timber, pulp and mining operation in the Amazon Basin of Brazil. From 1982 through 1989, while he was the chief executive officer of TOT Drilling Corp., TOT drilled many deep wells in West Texas and New Mexico for major and independent oil companies. Mr. Trescot served as an officer in the United States Navy. Mr. Trescot received his BME degree from Clemson University and his M.B.A. from Harvard University.
IV-53
F. Walker Tucei, Jr. has been elected to Magnum Hunter's Board of Directors effective November 2004. Mr. Tucei retired in 1999 after a distinguished 37-year career with Arthur Andersen, LLP. He was admitted to the firm's partnership in 1972. During his career with Arthur Andersen, LLP, Mr. Tucei served as the New Orleans office Partner-in-Charge of the audit practice from 1975 to 1986. He also served as the New Orleans office Managing Partner from 1986 to 1999 and was responsible for the firm's practice in Louisiana, Mississippi, southern Alabama, and western Florida. During his career with Arthur Andersen, LLP, Mr. Tucei served on various firm related task forces and committees. Mr. Tucei has been involved in numerous civic and non-profit organizations, including serving as President of the Southeast Louisiana Council of the Boy Scouts of America and the World Trade Center of New Orleans. A 1963 graduate of the University of Mississippi with a B.B.A. degree, Mr. Tucei is a Certified Public Accountant (Retired) in Louisiana and Mississippi. He is a member of both the American Institute and Louisiana Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Tucei has served since 2003 as a member of the board, member of the governance and nominating committees and currently serves as chairman of the audit committee for Newpark Resources, Inc. (NYSE:NR). Since 2000 he has also been a member of the Audit Committee for the Archdiocese of New Orleans and currently serves as Chairman of that committee.
Audit Committee
The members of Magnum Hunter's Audit Committee include Gerald W. Bolfing, Donald A. Erickson and F. Walker Tucei, Jr. Each member possesses the required level of financial literacy and at least two members, Donald A. Erickson and F. Walker Tucei, Jr., have been determined by the Board to meet the current standards of the "audit committee financial expert" required by applicable rules and regulations. No member of the Audit Committee has any relationship to Magnum Hunter that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from management and Magnum Hunter.
The Audit Committee selects the independent public accountants, reviews the independence of such accountants, approves the scope of the annual audit, approves the rendering of any material non-audit services by the independent accountants, approves the fee payable to the independent accountants and reviews the audit results. The Audit Committee approves all fees paid to Magnum Hunter's principal accountants.
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
| |
Individual Grants |
Potential realizable value at assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation for option term |
Alternative to (f) and (g): grant date value |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name |
Number of securities underlying Options/SARs granted (#) (b) |
Percent of total options SARs granted to employees in fiscal year (c) |
Exercise or base price($/Sh) (d) |
Expiration date (e) |
5% ($) (f) |
10% ($) (g) |
Grant date present value* $ (f)* |
||||||||
| Jerry Box | 7,500 | 0.5 | % | 10.48 | 7/1/09 | $ | 28,350 | ||||||||
| Gary C. Evans | 250,000 | 17.4 | % | 10.48 | 7/1/09 | $ | 945,000 | ||||||||
- *
- The Black-Scholes method was used to determine the value of the option grants.
IV-54
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option/SAR Values
| |
|
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options/SARs at fiscal year-end (#) |
Value of unexercised in- the money options/SARs at fiscal year-end ($) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name (a) |
Shares acquired on exercise (#) (b) |
Value Realized ($) (c) |
Exercisable/ unexercisable (d) |
Exercisable/ unexercisable (e) |
|||||
| Jerry Box | 20,000 | 84,000 | 38,100/14,500 | $ | 210,896/$63,090 | ||||
| Gary C. Evans | 250,000 | 1,457,500 | 818,000/410,000 | $ | 4,580,590/$1,634,600 | ||||
The following table sets forth information with respect to the equity compensation plans available to Magnum Hunter's directors, officers and employees as of December 31, 2004:
| |
(A) |
(B) |
(C) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and warrants |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column A). |
||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 4,719,562 | $ | 7.85 | 738,674 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
1,218,540 |
$ |
8.01 |
— |
|||
For those options which were granted under the plans not approved by Magnum Hunter's security holders, the options were granted by the Board of Directors in such amounts and to such employees whom the Board determined in their sole discretion. Each option grant vested 20% at the date of grant with the balance vesting an additional 20% per year on the anniversary date over the next four years. The exercise price was fair market value at the date of each grant.
Compensation of Directors
Magnum Hunter has eight individuals who serve as directors, seven of which have been determined by the Board to be independent. One director receives compensation with respect to his services and in his capacities as an executive officer of Magnum Hunter, and no additional compensation has historically been paid for his services as a director. The other eight directors were not employees at December 31, 2004, and receive no compensation for their services as directors other than as stated below. For fiscal year 2004, independent directors received a $26,000 retainer and $24,000 worth of restricted stock for being a board member and received $1,000 per regular and committee meeting attended. At December 1, 2004, the pay compensation for attending board and committee meetings was increased to $2,000 per meeting. In addition, for the fiscal year 2004 each independent director was granted stock options to acquire 7,500 shares of Magnum Hunter's common stock at an exercise price of $10.48 per share. Finally, all chairpersons of Magnum Hunter's board of directors' committees received an annual retainer of $2,500 for acting as chairman of his respective committee. Upon becoming Chairman of the Board during October 2004, Jerry Box began receiving compensation of $20,000 per month. This will continue through 2005. For fiscal year 2005, independent directors will receive a $26,000 retainer and $24,000 worth of restricted stock for being a board
IV-55
member and, in addition, will receive $2,000 per meeting attended and $2,000 per committee meeting attended. All chairpersons of Magnum Hunter's board of directors' committees will receive an annual retainer of $2,500 for acting as chairman of his respective committee. Other than the compensation stated herein, Magnum Hunter has not entered into any arrangement, including consulting contracts, in consideration of the director's service on the board.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
There are no loans or extensions of credit to directors of Magnum Hunter as of December 31, 2004.
IV-56
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
IV-57
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for asset retirement obligations in 2003 as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", and changed its method of accounting for employee stock-based option grants in 2003 by adopting the prospective method specified by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, and Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123".
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Dallas,
Texas
March 15, 2005
IV-58
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of dollars)
| |
December 31, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||||||||
| Current Assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 20,342 | $ | 18,693 | |||||
| Restricted cash | 212 | — | |||||||
| Accounts receivable | |||||||||
| Trade, net of allowance of $4,776 and $4,331, respectively | 85,462 | 46,716 | |||||||
| Notes receivable | 1,396 | 1,996 | |||||||
| Due from affiliates | 768 | — | |||||||
| Deferred income taxes, current | 5,010 | 8,263 | |||||||
| Deposits | 3,198 | 2,713 | |||||||
| Available for sale investments | 6,067 | 7,563 | |||||||
| Prepaid drilling costs | 9,480 | 8,770 | |||||||
| Other current assets | 7,579 | 5,623 | |||||||
| Total Current Assets | 139,514 | 100,337 | |||||||
| Property, Plant and Equipment | |||||||||
| Oil and gas properties, full-cost method | |||||||||
| Unproved | 94,472 | 110,467 | |||||||
| Proved | 1,828,839 | 1,292,388 | |||||||
| Pipelines | 36,607 | 34,149 | |||||||
| Other property | 9,969 | 7,805 | |||||||
| Total Property, Plant and Equipment | 1,969,887 | 1,444,809 | |||||||
| Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment | (472,975 | ) | (348,926 | ) | |||||
| Net Property Plant and Equipment | 1,496,912 | 1,095,883 | |||||||
| Other assets | |||||||||
| Deferred financing costs and other | 9,608 | 13,205 | |||||||
| Goodwill | 56,467 | 56,467 | |||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 1,702,501 | $ | 1,265,892 | |||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Trade payables | $ | 65,215 | $ | 28,793 | |||||
| Accrued interest | 5,764 | 8,909 | |||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 15,298 | 11,228 | |||||||
| Due to affiliates | 503 | 1,742 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 8,198 | 7,060 | |||||||
| Revenues payable | 10,871 | 7,860 | |||||||
| Suspended revenue payable | 22,401 | 16,049 | |||||||
| Derivative liabilities, current | 14,046 | 21,853 | |||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt | 2,458 | 2,009 | |||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 144,754 | 105,503 | |||||||
| Long-Term Liabilities | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, less current maturities | 643,042 | 595,503 | |||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | 40,086 | 32,489 | |||||||
| Derivative liabilities, noncurrent | 5,981 | 1,198 | |||||||
| Deferred income taxes payable | 188,366 | 141,000 | |||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 459 | 523 | |||||||
| Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||
| Preferred stock—$.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 216,000 designated as Series A; 80,000 issued and outstanding, liquidation amount $0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Common Stock—$.002 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 91,324,168 and 71,977,759 shares issued, respectively | 183 | 144 | |||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 615,046 | 429,446 | |||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (12,621 | ) | (13,576 | ) | |||||
| Retained earnings | 108,576 | 5,003 | |||||||
| Common stock in deferred compensation plan, at cost (34,416 shares) | (192 | ) | (192 | ) | |||||
| Unearned common stock in KSOP, at cost (880,083 and 1,012,203 shares, respectively) | (6,215 | ) | (6,110 | ) | |||||
| 704,778 | 414,716 | ||||||||
| Treasury stock, at cost (3,931,614 and 3,942,294 shares, respectively) | (24,965 | ) | (25,040 | ) | |||||
| Total Stockholders' Equity | 679,813 | 389,676 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 1,702,501 | $ | 1,265,892 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
IV-59
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands of dollars, except for share and per share amounts)
| |
For the Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
| Operating Revenues: | |||||||||||||
| Oil and gas sales | $ | 443,412 | $ | 284,929 | $ | 240,964 | |||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | 41,900 | 35,317 | 20,809 | ||||||||||
| Oil field services | 8,414 | 4,768 | 4,096 | ||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | 493,726 | 325,014 | 265,869 | ||||||||||
| Operating Costs and Expenses: | |||||||||||||
| Oil and gas production lifting costs | 60,945 | 56,262 | 51,559 | ||||||||||
| Production taxes and other costs | 43,704 | 32,772 | 28,167 | ||||||||||
| Gas gathering, marketing and processing | 29,112 | 25,373 | 15,100 | ||||||||||
| Oil field services | 5,016 | 3,119 | 2,474 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 127,179 | 99,614 | 86,468 | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of assets | (288 | ) | (171 | ) | (61 | ) | |||||||
| General and administrative | 22,125 | 15,347 | 13,293 | ||||||||||
| Total Operating Costs and Expenses | 287,793 | 232,316 | 197,000 | ||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 205,933 | 92,698 | 68,869 | ||||||||||
| Equity in (loss) earnings of affiliate | — | (162 | ) | 792 | |||||||||
| Other income | 2,584 | 889 | 452 | ||||||||||
| Provision for impairment of investments | — | — | (621 | ) | |||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt | (12,250 | ) | (6,716 | ) | (1,000 | ) | |||||||
| Non-cash hedging adjustments | 1,124 | 1,482 | (6,626 | ) | |||||||||
| Interest expense | (38,059 | ) | (47,260 | ) | (47,935 | ) | |||||||
| Income Before Income Tax | 159,332 | 40,931 | 13,931 | ||||||||||
| Provision for income tax (expense) benefit | |||||||||||||
Current |
(1,977 |
) |
250 |
— |
|||||||||
Deferred |
(53,782 |
) |
(15,463 |
) |
1,591 |
||||||||
| Total Provision for Income Tax (Expense) Benefit | (55,759 | ) | (15,213 | ) | 1,591 | ||||||||
| Income Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle | 103,573 | 25,718 | 15,522 | ||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income tax expense of $244 | — | 399 | — | ||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | |||||||
| Income per Common Share—Basic | |||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
$ |
1.35 |
$ |
0.38 |
$ |
0.25 |
|||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
— |
0.01 |
— |
||||||||||
| Income per Common Share—Basic | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | |||||||
| Income per Common Share—Diluted | |||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
$ |
1.31 |
$ |
0.38 |
$ |
0.25 |
|||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
— |
0.01 |
— |
||||||||||
| Income per Common Share—Diluted | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | |||||||
| Common Shares Used in Per Share Calculation | |||||||||||||
Basic |
76,952,204 |
66,191,816 |
61,493,428 |
||||||||||
| Diluted | 78,958,618 | 67,501,811 | 62,513,548 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
IV-60
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
(thousands)
| |
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Treasury Stock |
Additional Paid in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Receivable from Stockholder |
Unearned Shares in KSOP |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at January 1, 2002 | $ | 1 | $ | 73 | $ | (1,914 | ) | $ | 157,836 | $ | (36,636 | ) | $ | (442 | ) | $ | (2,576 | ) | $ | 1,632 | $ | 117,974 | |||||||||
| Issuance of 34,063 shares of common stock and warrants pursuant to Prize Energy Corp. merger, less fees | 68 | 260,454 | 260,522 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of 985 shares of common stock pursuant to employee stock option plan | 2 | 3,627 | 3,629 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax benefit on exercise of employee stock options | 859 | 859 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employer contribution of 158 shares to KSOP | 71 | 867 | 938 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of warrants | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of warrants | (128 | ) | (128 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repayment of shareholder loan | 442 | 442 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of 72 shares to KSOP for 2001 employer contribution | 601 | 601 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of 2,726 shares of treasury stock | (18,494 | ) | (18,494 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee salary deferrals to KSOP representing 86 shares | 39 | 473 | 512 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan of 532 shares to KSOP | (3,652 | ) | (3,652 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income, net of income tax benefit of $1,591 | 15,522 | 15,522 | 15,522 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment related to derivative contracts, net of deferred income tax expense of $1,684 | 2,762 | 2,762 | 2,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of outstanding hedge positions, net of deferred income tax benefits of $19,871 | (32,593 | ) | (32,593 | ) | (32,593 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchased hedge positions, net of deferred income tax benefit of $1,508 | (2,474 | ) | (2,474 | ) | (2,474 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of purchased hedge positions, net of deferred income tax expense of $2,299 | 3,771 | 3,771 | 3,771 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized loss on investments, net of deferred income tax benefit of $197 | (323 | ) | (323 | ) | (323 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for loss on investments, net of deferred income tax expense of $197 | 323 | 323 | 323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2002 | $ | 1 | $ | 143 | $ | (20,408 | ) | $ | 423,364 | $ | (21,114 | ) | $ | — | $ | (4,888 | ) | $ | (26,902 | ) | $ | 350,196 | $ | (13,012 | ) | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
IV-61
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
(thousands)
| |
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Treasury Stock |
Additional Paid in Capital |
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) |
Deferred Compensation |
Unearned Shares in KSOP |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at January 1, 2003 | $ | 1 | $ | 143 | $ | (20,408 | ) | $ | 423,364 | $ | (21,114 | ) | $ | — | $ | (4,888 | ) | $ | (26,902 | ) | $ | 350,196 | |||||||||
| Issuance of 270 shares of common stock pursuant to employee stock option plan | 1 | 1,244 | 1,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of 548 treasury shares upon exercise of warrants | 2,728 | 720 | 3,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax benefit on exercise of employee stock options | 613 | 613 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of 1,340 shares of treasury stock | (7,413 | ) | (7,413 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan to KSOP to purchase 486 shares | (2,711 | ) | (2,711 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee deferrals to KSOP to purchase 59 shares | 105 | 380 | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase 53 shares for deferred compensation plan | (295 | ) | (295 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employer contribution of 172 shares to KSOP | 336 | 1,109 | 1,445 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 3,017 | 3,017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of 18 treasury shares by deferred compensation plan | 53 | 47 | (100 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Release of 36 shares from deferred compensation plan | 203 | 203 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income, net of income tax expense of $15,213 | 26,117 | 26,117 | 26,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustments related to derivative contracts, net of deferred income tax expense of $28,330 | 46,469 | 46,469 | 46,469 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of outstanding hedge positions, net of deferred income tax benefit of $19,715 | (32,338 | ) | (32,338 | ) | (32,338 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of purchased hedge positions, net of deferred income tax benefit of $491 | (805 | ) | (805 | ) | (805 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2003 | $ | 1 | $ | 144 | $ | (25,040 | ) | $ | 429,446 | $ | 5,003 | $ | (192 | ) | $ | (6,110 | ) | $ | (13,576 | ) | $ | 389,676 | $ | 39,443 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
IV-62
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
(thousands)
| |
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Treasury Stock |
Additional Paid in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Deferred Compensation |
Unearned Shares in KSOP |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at January 1, 2004 | $ | 1 | $ | 144 | $ | (25,040 | ) | $ | 429,446 | $ | 5,003 | $ | (192 | ) | $ | (6,110 | ) | $ | (13,576 | ) | $ | 389,676 | |||||||||
| Issuance of 2,128 shares of common stock pursuant to employee stock option plan | 4 | 10,427 | 10,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of 17,250 shares through secondary offering, net of offering costs | 35 | 169,279 | 169,314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 768 | 768 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax benefit on exercise of employee stock options | 2,765 | 2,765 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan to KSOP to purchase 225 shares | (2,259 | ) | (2,259 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employer contribution of 223 shares to KSOP | 1,515 | 1,347 | 2,862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee salary deferrals to KSOP, representing 134 shares | 776 | 807 | 1,583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of 11 shares for Directors' compensation | 75 | 70 | 145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income, net of income tax expense of $55,759 | 103,573 | 103,573 | 103,573 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustments related to derivative contracts, net of deferred income tax expense of $15,859 | 27,950 | 27,950 | 27,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of outstanding hedge positions, net of deferred income tax benefit of $15,038 | (26,503 | ) | (26,503 | ) | (26,503 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of purchased hedge positions, net of deferred income tax benefit of $279 | (492 | ) | (492 | ) | (492 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2004 | $ | 1 | $ | 183 | $ | (24,965 | ) | $ | 615,046 | $ | 108,576 | $ | (192 | ) | $ | (6,215 | ) | $ | (12,621 | ) | $ | 679,813 | $ | 104,528 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
IV-63
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
| |
For the Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
| CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | |||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | — | (399 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 127,179 | 99,614 | 86,468 | ||||||||||
| Impairment of investments | — | — | 621 | ||||||||||
| Amortization of financing fees | 2,647 | 2,377 | 2,037 | ||||||||||
| Imputed interest on debt due to merger | — | — | 108 | ||||||||||
| Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts | 841 | 231 | 206 | ||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes (benefits) | 53,782 | 15,463 | (1,591 | ) | |||||||||
| Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated affiliate | — | 162 | (792 | ) | |||||||||
| Costs associated with early extinguishment of debt | 12,250 | 6,716 | 1,000 | ||||||||||
| Cost of shares released from KSOP suspense | 1,347 | 1,109 | 867 | ||||||||||
| Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary | (64 | ) | 89 | — | |||||||||
| Stock compensation | 768 | 3,017 | — | ||||||||||
| Non-cash directors' compensation | 145 | — | — | ||||||||||
| Excess of fair value over cost of shares released from KSOP suspense | 2,291 | 441 | 110 | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of assets | (288 | ) | (171 | ) | (61 | ) | |||||||
| Other non-cash hedging adjustments | (1,124 | ) | (1,482 | ) | 6,626 | ||||||||
| Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions | |||||||||||||
| Accounts and notes receivable | (40,357 | ) | 6,565 | (17,429 | ) | ||||||||
| Derivative assets | — | — | 3,600 | ||||||||||
| Deposits and other current assets | (2,872 | ) | (4,264 | ) | (9,314 | ) | |||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 42,931 | (1,081 | ) | (7,449 | ) | ||||||||
| (Payment) refund of income taxes | (2,439 | ) | 8,134 | 2,874 | |||||||||
| Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 300,610 | 162,638 | 83,403 | ||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets | 22,902 | 17,123 | 95,988 | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of unconsolidated affiliate | — | 5,160 | — | ||||||||||
| Purchase of land to be held for sale | — | (7,563 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Purchase of controlling interest in Metrix Networks, Inc., net of cash acquired | — | (253 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Additions to property and equipment | (303,125 | ) | (175,535 | ) | (141,046 | ) | |||||||
| Cash paid for New Mexico property acquisition | (234,180 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
| Cash paid in Prize merger net of cash acquired | — | — | (41,095 | ) | |||||||||
| (Increase) decrease in other assets | (136 | ) | (17 | ) | 238 | ||||||||
| Loan made for promissory note receivable | — | — | (2,596 | ) | |||||||||
| Payments received on promissory note receivable | 600 | 500 | — | ||||||||||
| Distribution from unconsolidated affiliate | — | 1,510 | 256 | ||||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated affiliate | — | (600 | ) | (1,165 | ) | ||||||||
| Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (513,939 | ) | (159,675 | ) | (89,420 | ) | |||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of debt | 466,000 | 517,375 | 627,850 | ||||||||||
| Fees paid related to financing activities | (1,011 | ) | (4,428 | ) | (11,961 | ) | |||||||
| Payments of principal on long-term debt and production payment liability | (313,012 | ) | (486,348 | ) | (591,451 | ) | |||||||
| Redemption of notes payable | (115,080 | ) | (134,374 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes | — | 125,000 | — | ||||||||||
| Loan repaid by stockholder | — | — | 742 | ||||||||||
| Loan to KSOP | (2,259 | ) | (2,711 | ) | (3,652 | ) | |||||||
| Loan repaid from KSOP | 807 | 380 | 473 | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 10,431 | 1,245 | 3,634 | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of secondary offering of common stock | 169,314 | — | — | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock | — | 3,448 | — | ||||||||||
| Purchase of warrants | — | — | (128 | ) | |||||||||
| Purchase of treasury stock | — | (7,413 | ) | (18,494 | ) | ||||||||
| (Increase) decrease in restricted cash for payment of notes payable | (212 | ) | 682 | (682 | ) | ||||||||
| Net decrease in note receivable from affiliate | — | 100 | — | ||||||||||
| Purchase common stock for deferred compensation plan | — | (295 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 214,978 | 12,661 | 6,331 | ||||||||||
| NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 1,649 | 15,624 | 314 | ||||||||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR | 18,693 | 3,069 | 2,755 | ||||||||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | $ | 20,342 | $ | 18,693 | $ | 3,069 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
IV-64
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Nature of Operations
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. ("Magnum Hunter"), is incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada. The company and our subsidiaries are engaged in the acquisition, operation and development of oil and gas properties, the gathering, processing, transmission, and marketing of natural gas and natural gas liquids and providing management, advisory consulting and measurement services on oil and gas properties for third parties. In conjunction with the above activities, we own and operate oil and gas properties in twelve states, predominantly in the Southwest region of the United States. In addition, we own and operate five gathering systems located in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico and own an interest in four natural gas processing plants located in Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas.
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Magnum Hunter and our existing wholly-owned subsidiaries, Gruy Petroleum Management Co., Magnum Hunter Production, Inc., ConMag Energy Corporation, Trapmar Properties, Inc., Hunter Gas Gathering, Inc. ("Hunter"), Canvasback Energy, Inc., Pintail Energy, Inc., Redhead Energy, Inc. ("Redhead"), Prize Operating Co., PEC (Delaware), Inc., Oklahoma Gas Processing, Inc., and Prize Energy Resources, LP. We consolidate on a pro rata basis our approximately 29% ownership of TEL Offshore Trust, our 1% interest in Mallard Hunter, LP, our 5% interest in Teal Hunter, LP and our 40% interest in Appletree Holdings LLC. Prior to December 2003, we accounted for our approximately 32% interest in Metrix Networks, Inc. ("Metrix") under the equity method. We acquired an 80% controlling interest in Metrix during December 2003, and thus fully consolidate them with a minority interest for the outside owners' 20%. Prior to its sale in September 2003, we also accounted for our investment in NGTS, LLC ("NGTS") under the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements of the prior years to conform to the current presentation.
Magnum Hunter is a holding company with no significant assets or operations other than our investments in our subsidiaries. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for Canvasback Energy, Inc., Redhead and Metrix, collectively referred to as Canvasback, are direct guarantors of our 9.6% Senior Notes and our Convertible Notes, and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed these notes on a joint and several basis. The guarantors comprise all of our direct and indirect subsidiaries (other than Canvasback), and we have presented separate condensed consolidating financial statements and other disclosures concerning each guarantor and Canvasback (See Note 16). Except for Canvasback, there is no restriction on the ability of consolidated or unconsolidated subsidiaries to transfer funds to Magnum Hunter in the form of cash dividends, loans, or advances.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We have cash deposits in excess of federally insured limits.
Investments
We follow accounting procedures according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Under this standard, all of our equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are classified as current
IV-65
or non-current assets, available-for-sale and are measured at fair value and are recognized as either current or non-current assets. Unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported as comprehensive income and accumulated as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Realized gains and losses are calculated based on the specific identification method. We recorded an impairment on an investment in the common stock of another entity whose stock was held by us for resale for its full carrying value of $621 thousand during 2002. At December 31, 2003 and 2004, we carried no value for our available-for-sale securities.
KSOP
As required under Statement of Position 93-6 "Employers Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans," compensation expense is recorded for shares committed to be released to employees based on the fair market value of those shares when they are committed to be released. The difference between cost and the fair market value of the committed to be released shares is recorded in additional paid-in-capital. Unreleased shares held by the KSOP are excluded from the calculation of earnings per share.
Suspended Revenues
Suspended revenue interests represent oil and gas sales payable to third parties largely on properties operated by the company. We distribute such amounts to third parties upon receipt of signed division orders or resolution of other legal matters.
Oil and Gas Properties
We use the full-cost method of accounting for our investments in oil and gas properties. Accordingly, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related overhead costs, are capitalized into a "full-cost pool" on a country-by-country basis as incurred. Internal costs that directly relate to acquisition, exploration and development activities that were capitalized totaled $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The balance of capitalized costs included in oil and gas properties for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $6.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Management believes that the basis we use to determine the amount of internal costs capitalized is appropriate.
All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves and estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are amortized on the unit-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. Costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization base until the related properties are evaluated. Such unproved properties are assessed for impairment quarterly and any provision for impairment is transferred to the full-cost amortization base. Sales of oil and gas properties, including consideration received from sales or transfers of properties in connection with partnerships, joint venture operations or drilling arrangements, are credited to the full-cost pool unless the sale would have a significant effect on the amortization rate. Abandonment of properties is accounted for as an adjustment to capitalized costs with no loss recognized.
In accordance with SFAS 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," we carry a liability for any legal retirement obligations on our oil and gas properties. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the full cost pool. We adopted SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003 and recorded
IV-66
proved property additions of $30.4 million in relation to the transition entry. See Note 3 for additional information on our asset retirement obligations.
Reserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent on the quality of available data and on engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserve estimates are subject to change over time as additional information becomes available.
A summary of the unproved properties excluded from proved oil and gas properties being amortized at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and the year in which they were incurred follows:
| |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Prior |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Total |
|||||||||||
| |
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||
| Property Acquisition Costs | $ | 3,585 | $ | 54,648 | $ | 9,279 | $ | 19,582 | $ | 87,094 | ||||||
| Exploration Costs | — | — | 896 | 6,482 | 7,378 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,585 | $ | 54,648 | $ | 10,175 | $ | 26,064 | $ | 94,472 | ||||||
| |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prior |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Total |
||||||||||||
| |
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||
| Property Acquisition Costs | $ | 304 | $ | 4,900 | $ | 83,836 | $ | 12,207 | $ | 101,247 | ||||||
| Exploration Costs | — | — | — | 9,220 | 9,220 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 304 | $ | 4,900 | $ | 83,836 | $ | 21,427 | $ | 110,467 | ||||||
Costs are transferred into the amortization base on an ongoing basis as the projects are evaluated and proved reserves are established or impairment determined. Pending determination of proved reserves attributable to the above costs, we cannot assess the future impact on the amortization rate.
The capitalized costs are subject to a "ceiling test", which generally limits such costs less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes to the aggregate of the estimated present value of future net revenues from proved reserves discounted at ten percent based on current economic and operating conditions less income tax effects related to the differences between the book and tax basis of the oil and gas properties. The ceiling test is performed on a quarterly basis. We experienced no impairment in 2004, 2003, or 2002.
For purposes of the ceiling test, we remove the discounted present value included in our future development costs on our reserve report for which we have already booked an obligation under SFAS 143. For purposes of our depletion calculation, we include in future development costs the estimated plugging and abandonment costs, net of estimated salvage values, for proved undeveloped wells. For purposes of both of these calculations, we do not include plugging and abandonment costs in our future development costs on developed proportions for which we have booked an obligation under SFAS 143.
All costs relating to production activities are charged to expense as incurred.
IV-67
Amortization expense per thousand cubic feet equivalent was $1.50, $1.28 and $1.17 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
Our product price and interest hedging activities are described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. Periodically we enter into derivative instruments such as futures, swaps and options contracts to reduce the adverse effects of fluctuations in natural gas and crude oil prices. Under our risk management policy, at inception, commodity hedge positions may not exceed 75% of natural gas and 90% of crude oil current forecasted (18 months) commodity production. For forecasted non-current (greater than 18 months) commodity production, at inception, commodity hedge positions for both natural gas and crude oil may not exceed 75% of forecasted production for each product. We also may utilize, from time to time, financial derivative instruments to hedge the risk associated with interest on our outstanding variable-rate debt. Generally, the cash settlement of all derivative instruments is recognized as income or expense in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
All freestanding financial derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts if certain criteria are met, are recognized at estimated fair value on our balance sheet. We determine our fair values based on market values obtained from our counterparties. Derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through net income. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the hedged items, and are recognized in net income. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are cash-flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as the hedged items are recognized in net income. Ineffective portions of a derivative instrument's change in fair value are immediately recognized in net income.
Gas Processing Plants and Pipelines
Gas processing plants and pipelines are carried at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 15 years. Gain or loss on retirement or sale or other disposition of assets is included in results of operations in the period of disposition. We review the carrying value of pipelines and processing plants and other long-lived assets (other than oil and gas assets accounted for under the full-cost method) for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where the undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The fair value is determined using the discounted cash flows method.
Other Property
Other property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to 39 years. Gain or loss on retirement or sale or other disposition of assets is included in results of operations in the period of disposition.
IV-68
Other Oil and Gas Related Services
Other oil and gas related services consist largely of fees earned from our operation and monitoring services of oil and gas properties for third parties. Such fees are recognized in the month the service is provided.
Magnum Hunter does not recognize income in connection with drilling, well service or other services provided in connection with oil and gas properties in which we hold an ownership or other economic interest to the extent of our interest. Any proceeds received for services performed that are not recognized as income are credited to the full cost pool.
Stock Compensation
At December 31, 2004, we had four stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 13. We currently account for our employee stock option plans under SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123," in December 2002. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. On June 1, 2003, and effective January 1, 2003, we began expensing the fair market value of stock options newly granted, modified or settled pursuant to SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and as allowed under the prospective method of SFAS No. 148. The fair value of each option granted after December 31, 2002, is estimated on the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, we recorded stock compensation expense of $3.0 million and $768 thousand, respectively, which is reflected in our general and administrative expenses. For options granted prior to January 1, 2003, we continue to use the intrinsic method under APB No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Related Interpretations," whereby no compensation expense is recognized for stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of our stock on the grant date. Our future accounting for stock-based compensation will be impacted by the issuance of SFAS No. 123(R). Please see our Recently Issued Statements discussion below for additional information.
IV-69
If we had recorded stock option expense under the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123 for all prior and current grants, our net income and earnings per share ("EPS") would have been as shown in the below pro forma tables (in thousands):
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| Net income, as reported | $ | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | |||||
Total Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of income taxes of $278 and $1,144, respectively |
490 |
1,873 |
— |
||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of income taxes of $1,871, $2,896, and $1,962 respectively |
(3,298 |
) |
(4,751 |
) |
(3,219 |
) |
|||||
| Pro forma net income | $ | 100,765 | $ | 23,239 | $ | 12,303 | |||||
| Earnings per share: | |||||||||||
| Basic—as reported | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | |||||
| Basic—pro forma | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.20 | |||||
| Diluted—as reported | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | |||||
| Diluted—pro forma | $ | 1.28 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.20 | |||||
The company estimated the fair value of each stock based grant (options and warrants) using the Black-Scholes option pricing method while using the following weighted average assumptions:
| |
2004(a) |
2003(b) |
2002 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.38 | % | 1.58 | % | 3.68 | % | ||||
| Expected life | 4.1 years | 2.1 years | 7.4 years | |||||||
| Expected volatility | 40.7 | % | 46.3 | % | 49.5 | % | ||||
| Dividend yield | — | — | — | |||||||
| Weighted average fair value of options granted | $ | 3.81 | $ | 3.03 | $ | 3.17 | ||||
- (a)
- We
granted 1,403,000 options during 2004, which had a reduced term of four years. Prior grants have ten-year terms.
- (b)
- We granted 999,260 options during 2003, which had a reduced term of three years. Prior grants have ten-year terms.
Insurance Proceeds
As a result of damages incurred during Hurricane Lili, we received proceeds of $904 thousand and $1 million, during the years ended 2004 and 2003 respectively. We credited $608 thousand in each of the years 2004 and 2003 against proved property to represent damages paid for equipment losses. In
IV-70
2004 and 2003, we included $296 thousand and $399 thousand, respectively, of these proceeds in oil and gas sales, which represented business interruption proceeds.
Income Taxes
We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due, if any, plus net deferred taxes related primarily to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets include recognition of operating losses that are available to offset future taxable income and tax credits that are available to offset future income taxes. Valuation allowances are recognized to limit recognition of deferred tax assets where appropriate. Such allowances may be reversed when circumstances provide evidence that the deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized. We recorded a valuation allowance of $2.0 million on deferred tax assets representing state operating loss carryforwards during 2004 due to management's estimate that these operating loss carryforwards would not be realized before their expiration.
Goodwill
As a result of our merger with Prize, we currently have recorded $56.5 million of goodwill. Under SFAS No. 142, we will not amortize any of the goodwill acquired in the merger. All goodwill has been allocated to the Exploration and Production reporting unit. We test our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or whenever indicators of impairment exist. We performed our annual impairment test at December 31, 2004, and determined that no impairment existed. The annual impairment test requires management to make significant estimates and judgments. If impairment is determined to exist, we will measure our impairment based on a comparison of the carrying value of goodwill to the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the Exploration and Production reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, impairment will be recognized in the income statement.
Asset Retirement Obligations
SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," became effective beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires the recognition of a fair value liability for any retirement obligation associated with long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. See Note 3 for additional information on our asset retirement obligations. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 143, we recorded an addition to oil and gas properties of $25.4 million, an asset retirement obligation of $30.4 million, a reduction of accumulated depletion of $5.6 million, and a pre-tax gain of $643 thousand. The retirement obligation requires management to make significant estimates and judgments regarding our expected plugging costs and retirement dates.
IV-71
Recently Issued Statements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 142-2, "Application of FASB Statement 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to Oil-and-Gas Producing Entities" after evaluating an issue involving the classification of mineral rights. In June 2001, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations," which requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. In July 2001, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which discontinues the practice of amortizing goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets and initiates an annual review of impairment. Intangible assets with a determinable useful life will continue to be amortized over that period. The amortization provisions apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 141 and 142 clarify that more assets should be distinguished and classified between tangible and intangible. We did not change or reclassify contractual mineral rights included in proved and unproved oil and gas properties on our balance sheet upon adoption of SFAS No. 142. We believe the treatment of such mineral rights as tangible assets under the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties is appropriate. An issue was raised regarding whether these mineral rights should be classified as tangible or intangible assets. FSP No. 142-2 addressed this issue and supports our current accounting treatment of mineral rights and will not impact our financial statements. This FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after September 2, 2004.
FASB issued FSP FAS 129-1, "Disclosure Requirements Under FASB Statement No. 129, Disclosure of Information About Capital Structure," in April 2004. This FSP provides additional guidance on the disclosure requirements of contingently convertible securities. We have made the required disclosures related to the terms of our Convertible Notes and have provided explanations in Note 5 about the dilutive effects of these notes on our earnings per share.
FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") has issued an EITF Abstract for EITF Issue No. 04-8, "The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share," which addresses the issue of when the dilutive effects of contingently convertible debt instruments should be included in diluted earnings per share. This guidance would require companies to include the dilutive effect of convertible debt securities in diluted earnings per share regardless of whether or not the contingent conversion features have been triggered. This EITF is effective for periods ending after December 15, 2004. We have accordingly included approximately 94 thousand potential shares to be issued for our Convertible Notes in our earnings per share computations for the year ending 2004 based on the spread between our average market price during the year and the conversion price on these notes. We did not include any potential dilution for the 2003 period because the conversion price did not exceed our average market price during that period.
The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 106 was released in September 2004. SAB 106 expresses the SEC staff's views on the interaction of SFAS No. 143 and the full cost method and provides guidance on computing the full cost ceiling as well as depreciation, depletion, and amortization. The SAB also requires additional disclosures regarding how the application of SFAS No. 143 has affected the ceiling test and depreciation, depletion and amortization. This guidance is effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after its publication. We implemented this guidance for our ceiling test and depletion calculations during the fourth quarter of 2004 and experienced no significant impact.
IV-72
FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment", during December 2004. Under this revised guidance, all share-based equity and liability instruments will be recorded as compensation expense based on their fair values, and all liability instruments will be remeasured each reporting period. This guidance will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual or interim reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, which would cause us to adopt this statement July 1, 2005. We currently account for our stock-based compensation under the prospective method, under which we only record compensation expense on awards granted after 2003. Upon adoption of this statement, we will apply the modified prospective method to our equity instruments under which compensation expense will also be recorded on the unvested portions of awards granted prior to 2003. At this time, we estimate the pre-tax impact of these prior years' grants on 2005 earnings to be an additional pre-tax expense of $1.2 million.
FASB also issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29", during December 2004. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 by eliminating the exception from fair value measurement prescribed in that statement and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that have no significant impact on future cash flows. This statement is effective for exchanges that take place in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect this statement to have an impact on our future financial results.
Income or Loss Per Common Share
Basic net income or loss per common share is computed by dividing the net income or loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income or loss per common share is calculated in the same manner, but also considers the impact to net income and common shares for the potential dilution from stock options, stock warrants and any other outstanding convertible securities.
IV-73
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the computations of both basic and diluted EPS (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
| |
For the Year Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
December 31, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Income (Numerator) |
Shares (Denominator) |
Per Share Amount |
Income (Numerator) |
Shares (Denominator) |
Per Share Amount |
Income (Numerator) |
Shares (Denominator) |
Per Share Amount |
||||||||||||||||
| Income before Cumulative Effect | $ | 103,573 | 76,952 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 25,718 | 66,192 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 15,522 | 61,493 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||||
| Add: Cumulative Effect | — | — | 399 | 0.01 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basic EPS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income available to common stockholders | $ | 103,573 | 76,952 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 26,117 | 66,192 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 15,522 | 61,493 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrants | — | 57 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible Notes | 94 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options | 1,913 | 1,253 | 986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted EPS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions | $ | 103,573 | 78,959 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 26,117 | 67,502 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 15,522 | 62,514 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||||
| Less: Cumulative Effect | — | — | (399 | ) | (0.01 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Income before Cumulative Effect | $ | 103,573 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 25,718 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 15,522 | $ | 0.25 | |||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004, we had 7,228,457 warrants outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $15.00 per share, 5,938,102 options outstanding at a weighted average price of $7.88 per share, and no outstanding convertible preferred stock. Warrants totaling 7,228,457 shares and options totaling 376,125 shares were excluded from the diluted net income per share computation in 2004 because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of our stock. There was a 93,750 share dilutive effect from our Convertible Notes for the year ending December 31, 2004. Please see Note 5 for a discussion of the conversion features of these Notes.
At December 31, 2003, we had 7,228,457 warrants outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $15.00 per share, 6,740,764 options outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $6.36 per share, and no outstanding convertible preferred stock. Warrants totaling 7,550,832 shares and options totaling 2,299,300 shares were excluded from the diluted net income per share computation in 2003 as the exercise price exceeded the average market price of our common stock. There was no dilutive effect from our Convertible Notes because their conversion price exceeded the average market price during the period, and only the conversion spread is issuable in shares.
IV-74
At December 31, 2002, we had 7,873,206 warrants outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $14.32 per share, 6,044,800 options outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $6.37 per share, and no outstanding convertible preferred stock. Warrants totaling 7,838,600 shares and options totaling 5,059,286 shares were excluded from the diluted net income per share computation in 2002 as the exercise price exceeded the average market price of our common stock.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when title to the product transfers to purchasers. We follow the "sales method" of accounting for revenue for oil and natural gas production, so that sales revenue is recognized on all production sold to purchasers, regardless of whether the sales are proportionate to our ownership in the property. In these instances when our sales are not proportionate to our interest, a receivable or liability is recognized only to the extent that we have an imbalance on a specific property greater than the expected remaining proved reserves. Current revenues are accrued based on expectations of actual deliveries and actual prices received. Plant revenues are recognized as product is sold, and our gathering fees are recognized as the gathering services are performed. Revenues for our oilfield management services segment are recognized as services are performed and equipment is delivered.
Inflation and Changes in Prices
Our results of operations and cash flow have been, and will continue to be, affected by the volatility in oil and gas prices. Should we experience a significant increase in oil and gas prices that is sustained over a prolonged period, we would expect that there would also be a corresponding increase in oil and gas finding costs, lease acquisition costs, and operating expenses.
We market oil and gas for our own account, which exposes us to the attendant commodities risk. A significant portion of our gas production is currently sold to end-users either (i) on the spot market on a month-to-month basis at prevailing spot market prices or (ii) under long-term contracts based on current spot market prices. We normally sell our oil under month-to-month contracts to a variety of purchasers.
Use of Estimates and Certain Significant Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved oil and gas reserves, which, as described above, may affect the amount at which oil and gas properties are recorded. It is at least reasonably possible those estimates could be revised in the near term and those revisions could be material.
Treasury Stock
We may repurchase shares of common stock in stock repurchase programs. Our repurchases of shares of common stock are recorded as treasury stock at cost and result in a reduction of stockholders' equity. When treasury shares are reissued, we use a first-in first-out method and the difference between repurchase cost and reissuance price is treated as an adjustment to paid-in capital.
IV-75
NOTE 2—ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
On July 30, 2004, we purchased oil and gas properties located in the state of New Mexico, primarily in Lea and Eddy counties for $239.1 million, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The properties include both proved producing oil and gas wells and proved undeveloped leasehold mineral interests. The effective date of the acquisition was May 1, 2004. We purchased additional properties related to this acquisition during September 2004 for a purchase price of $1.4 million, net of certain purchase price adjustments. We also recorded additional asset retirement obligations of $1.5 million as a result of the acquisition. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to our historical results of operations.
On August 30, 2004, we entered into an agreement to purchase approximately 170 producing wells located in the Permian Basin of West Texas for $40 million, net of certain purchase price adjustments. Closing occurred on October 29, 2004 and had an effective date of September 1, 2004. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to our historical results of operations.
On July 29, 2003, we exercised our option to sell our 30% interest in NGTS. At that date, we reduced the carrying value and recorded a charge to equity in earnings of affiliate of approximately $791 thousand to state our investment at its estimated fair value. The sale closed on September 30, 2003, and we received proceeds of $5.2 million on that date which we used to repay indebtedness. No gain or loss was recorded at the time of sale. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to our historical results of operations.
On November 19, 2003, we acquired an 80% controlling ownership interest in Metrix, an internet-based field marketing service company, through the settlement of outstanding litigation in our favor as well as the conversion of our $325 thousand loan to Metrix into equity of that company. As a result of the settlement, we have fully consolidated Metrix, effective December 1, 2003. Prior to this acquisition, we accounted for our approximate 32% ownership interest in Metrix as an equity investment. No goodwill was recorded on this acquisition. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented, as the effect was not material to our historical results of operations.
On March 15, 2002, we merged with Prize Energy Corp. ("Prize"), a publicly traded independent oil and gas development and production company. The transaction was accounted for by us as a purchase of Prize in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations". As a result of our merger with Prize, we acquired oil and gas properties located in three of our core operating areas: the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico, the onshore Gulf Coast area of Texas and Louisiana and the Mid-Continent area of Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. This allowed us to meet our goal of increasing reserves in geographic regions similar to our own which allows us to achieve operating synergies and production enhancements. Under the terms of the merger, we distributed 2.5 shares of common stock plus $5.20 in cash for each Prize share outstanding. The purchase price, computed from the equity and cash consideration given at the time of the merger, was allocated to the fair value of the net assets acquired. The amount of purchase price in excess of the fair value of Prize's net assets was assigned to goodwill. We assigned the goodwill to our exploration and production segment when the purchase price allocation was finalized in June 2003. The following table
IV-76
summarizes the total assumed purchase price and related final allocation to the net assets acquired (amounts in thousands) as of June 30, 2003:
| Total Purchase Price: | ||||||
| Fair Value of 34,062,963 shares of Magnum Hunter common stock | $ | 257,175 | ||||
| Cash consideration | 70,851 | |||||
| Fair Value of Prize warrants | 3,416 | |||||
| Total | $ | 331,442 | ||||
| Net Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation: | ||||||
| Net purchase price | $ | 331,442 | ||||
| Historical net assets acquired | (148,272 | ) | ||||
| Excess purchase price | 183,170 | |||||
| Adjustment of proved oil and gas properties to fair value | (63,915 | ) | ||||
| Adjustment of unproved oil and gas properties to fair value | (139,395 | ) | ||||
| Adjustment of gas plant to fair value | (18,856 | ) | ||||
| Write-off of historical Prize deferred financing costs | 2,363 | |||||
| Other fair value adjustments | 1,436 | |||||
| Imputed interest on debt due to merger | (108 | ) | ||||
| Additional deferred income taxes | 91,865 | |||||
| Excess purchase price allocated to goodwill | $ | 56,560 | ||||
During the third and fourth quarters of 2003, we divested of a number of oil and gas properties. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we attached $93 thousand of goodwill to the divested properties. Proceeds (net of goodwill) of approximately $17 million were applied against the full cost pool. The remaining goodwill balance at December 31, 2004 was $56.5 million. Also in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we performed a goodwill impairment test at December 31, 2004. Test results showed no impairment of goodwill. The goodwill acquired is not deductible for tax purposes. Historical net assets acquired in the merger were as follows (in thousands):
| Current assets | $ | 78,440 | ||
| Properties, plant and equipment, net | 398,409 | |||
| Other assets | 3,093 | |||
| Current liabilities | (42,626 | ) | ||
| Long-term debt | (245,819 | ) | ||
| Deferred income taxes | (40,677 | ) | ||
| Other non-current liabilities | (2,548 | ) | ||
| Historical net assets acquired | $ | 148,272 | ||
IV-77
Changes to the carrying value of goodwill during the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, are as follows (in thousands):
| Balance at December 31, 2002 | $ | 50,710 | ||
| Goodwill acquired | — | |||
| Purchase price adjustments | 5,850 | |||
| Adjustment for divested properties | (93 | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2003 | 56,467 | |||
| Goodwill acquired | — | |||
| Purchase price adjustments | — | |||
| Adjustment for divested properties | — | |||
| Balance at December 31, 2004 | $ | 56,467 | ||
The following summary, prepared on a pro forma basis, presents the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002, as if the acquisition of Prize occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods. The pro forma information includes the effects of adjustments for interest expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization, and income taxes. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of each period presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results. Prize was included in our consolidated results of operations beginning March 1, 2002.
Pro Forma Results of Operations
(Unaudited)
(in thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $ | 292,872 | |||
| Total Operating Costs and Expenses | (219,575 | ) | |||
| Operating Profit | 73,297 | ||||
| Interest Expense and Other | (60,202 | ) | |||
| Income before Tax | 13,095 | ||||
| Benefit for Income Tax | 892 | ||||
| Net Income | $ | 13,987 | |||
| Net Income Per Common Share | |||||
| Basic | $ | 0.20 | |||
| Diluted | $ | 0.20 | |||
NOTE 3—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," became effective beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires the recognition of a fair value liability for any legal retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable
IV-78
estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. Prior to adopting SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003, we accounted for asset retirement obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 19.
Our long-lived assets captured under SFAS No. 143 are developed oil and gas properties, production and distribution facilities, and natural gas processing plants. Our asset retirement obligations include plugging, abandonment, decommission, and remediation costs. We have included $1.2 million of our asset retirement obligations in other current liabilities at December 31, 2004.
The following is a reconciliation of the asset retirement obligation liability at December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
| Beginning balance at January 1, 2004 | $ | 32,489 | ||
| Liabilities incurred | 7,260 | |||
| Liabilities settled | (761 | ) | ||
| Liabilities sold/disposed | (1,120 | ) | ||
| Accretion expense | 2,941 | |||
| Change in retirement cost estimates | 468 | |||
| Ending balance at December 31, 2004 | $ | 41,277 | ||
The following pro forma data summarizes our net income and net income per share as if we had adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2002. The associated pro forma asset retirement obligation was $16.9 million on January 1, 2002, and an additional asset retirement obligation of $12.9 million would have been recorded at March 1, 2002, in conjunction with the Prize merger. The balance at December 31, 2002 would have been $30.4 million. Values in the pro forma summary are in thousands, except for the per share amounts.
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
| Net income, as reported | $ | 103,573 | $ | 26,117 | $ | 15,522 | ||||
| Pro forma adjustment to reflect retroactive adoption of SFAS No. 143, net of related tax effects | — | (399 | ) | 1 | ||||||
| Pro forma net income | $ | 103,573 | $ | 25,718 | $ | 15,523 | ||||
| Earnings per share: | ||||||||||
| Basic—as reported | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
| Basic—pro forma | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
| Diluted—as reported | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
| Diluted—pro forma | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
IV-79
NOTE 4—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, our note receivable from the Magnum Hunter 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan (KSOP) was $6.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively. The purpose of the loan is to allow the KSOP to purchase Magnum Hunter common stock on the open market. The loan is interest free, due December 31, 2005, and is secured by shares of the company's common stock which have not been earned by participants in the KSOP. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the number of unearned shares in the KSOP were 880,083 and 1,012,203, respectively. The unearned shares and their corresponding costs were reflected on our consolidated balance sheets as reductions to stockholders' equity.
There are no loans or extensions of credit to directors and executive officers of Magnum Hunter as of December 31, 2003 or 2004.
NOTE 5—DEBT
Notes payable and long-term debt at December 31, 2004 and 2003 consisted of the following (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-Term Debt: | ||||||
| Bank debt under revolving credit agreements due May 2, 2007, 3.92% at December 31, 2004 | $ | 320,000 | $ | 165,000 | ||
| Capital lease obligations, 5.58% at December 31, 2004 | 5,500 | 7,500 | ||||
| Senior unsecured notes, due March 15, 2012, 9.6% | 195,000 | 300,000 | ||||
| Floating rate convertible senior notes, due December 15, 2023 2.49% at December 31, 2004 | 125,000 | 125,000 | ||||
| Production payment liability, non-recourse | — | 12 | ||||
| 645,500 | 597,512 | |||||
| Less current portion | 2,458 | 2,009 | ||||
| Total Long-Term Debt | $ | 643,042 | $ | 595,503 | ||
The following table presents the approximate annual maturities of debt:
| |
(in thousands) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | $ | 2,458 | ||
| 2006 | 807 | |||
| 2007 | 322,235 | |||
| Thereafter | 320,000 | |||
| Total | $ | 645,500 | ||
We have a Senior Bank Credit Facility ("Facility"), which provides for total borrowings of $750 million, on which our borrowing base was limited to $525 million at December 31, 2004. The level of the borrowing base is dependent on the valuation by the lenders of the assets pledged, which are primarily oil and gas reserves.
IV-80
During 2004, we amended our Facility in April, July, and October to ultimately increase the borrowing base to $525 million, up $270 million from our previous $255 million borrowing base. We also extended the expiration date of the Facility to May 2, 2007. The amended facility allowed us to use proceeds from our secondary common stock offering to redeem and retire $105 million in principal of our 9.6% Senior Notes outstanding. We used the increased borrowing base to fund the costs of issuing our Convertible Notes and to fund the acquisitions of oil and gas properties in New Mexico and West Texas. The Facility provides for both a LIBOR and "Base rate" (Prime) interest rate option. At December 31, 2004, we had no borrowings under the Base rate option and $320 million outstanding at LIBOR + 1.50%. We also have a letter of credit posted against our borrowing base of $2.5 million. While we have no actual borrowings against this letter of credit, it reduces our funds available under the borrowing base. The letter of credit was posted to cover any plugging and abandonment costs, as well as potential environmental remediation costs after the property is plugged, of a property previously owned by Prize. We have entered non-binding arbitration to attempt to eliminate the need for this letter of credit. At December 31, 2004, we had available credit under this Facility of $202.5 million.
Our Facility includes covenants, the most restrictive of which requires maintenance of a funded debt to EBITDA ratio and an interest coverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement. We were in compliance with the covenants in 2003 and 2004. We expect to be able to comply with these covenants in the future. The lenders to the Facility must approve all dividends paid on common stock, other than those paid in common stock, and have approved both the redemption of our 10% Senior Notes, the partial redemption of our 9.6% Senior Notes and the issuance of our Convertible Notes.
On a semi-annual basis, our borrowing base under our Facility is redetermined by the financial institutions who have committed to the company based on their review of our pledged proved oil and gas reserves and other assets. If the outstanding balance on the Facility exceeds the redetermined borrowing base, we must repay the excess over the next six months. The last redetermination date had an effective date of June 30, 2004, and was completed on October 15, 2004. This redetermination increased our borrowing base by $45 million. Our next redetermination date will have an effective date of December 31, 2004, and has an estimated completion date of no later than May 9, 2005.
On March 15, 2002, Canvasback entered into a $10 million revolving credit agreement with a financial institution. The credit agreement provided for both LIBOR and prime based interest rate options. On June 30, 2002, we converted the $5.8 million balance under this agreement to a term loan due March 7, 2004. Proceeds from the loan were used to purchase $5.8 million of our 10% Senior Notes from Magnum Hunter, which had been purchased by Magnum Hunter during 2001 and held for investment. These 10% Senior Notes, along with $4.7 million in 10% Senior Notes contributed to Canvasback from Bluebird, served as the only collateral for this loan. We borrowed additional funds of $1.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2002, increasing the balance to $7 million. This loan was non-recourse to Magnum Hunter. In conjunction with the redemption of our 10% Senior Notes during 2003, this loan was paid in full and the agreement was terminated.
On January 15, 2002, we entered into a sale-leaseback transaction on three newly-constructed production platforms and associated pipelines located in the Gulf of Mexico that had already been placed into service. We received total proceeds of $11.2 million in new funding, which we used for general corporate purposes. The production platforms are being leased from a syndicate group of lenders over terms from three to five years at a cost of funds based on LIBOR, yielding a weighted average rate of 5.58% at December 31, 2004.
IV-81
On May 29, 1997, we completed a private placement of $140 million in unsecured 10% Senior Notes, due June 1, 2007. During 2003, we paid $145.2 million to redeem the $140 million in principal of our 10% Senior Notes. This redemption was funded by borrowings under our Facility as well as the issuance of $125 million in Convertible Notes during December 2003. We paid approximately $5.2 million in premiums to redeem these notes. Of the notes redeemed, Canvasback received approximately $10.9 million in principal and received premiums of approximately $273 thousand.
We completed a private placement of $300 million in unsecured 9.6% Senior Notes on March 15, 2002. The 9.6% Senior Notes are due March 15, 2012, with interest payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15. We used the funds received to: i) retire outstanding indebtedness under the Prize commercial bank credit facility, ii) pay fees related to the issuance of the new Senior Notes, and iii) for general corporate purposes. On August 27, 2004, we redeemed $105 million in principal of our 9.6% Senior Notes at a redemption price of 109.6% of par. We paid the holders of these redeemed notes $115.1 million plus accrued and unpaid interest of $4.5 million. We used a portion of the proceeds from our secondary offering to fund this redemption. We recorded $12.3 million in costs associated with this redemption comprised of $10.1 million in premiums and $2.2 million in unamortized deferred financing fees which were written off.
During December 2003, we issued $125 million in face value of Convertible Notes. These Convertible Notes bear interest equal to the three-month LIBOR, to be adjusted quarterly. The rate on the Convertible Notes was 2.49% at December 31, 2004. They are convertible into a combination of cash and Magnum Hunter common stock upon certain events. The initial conversion price is $12.19, subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The Convertible Notes are due December 2023, but holders of these notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the notes on December 15, 2008, 2013, and 2018. If repurchase is elected, we will repurchase these notes for an amount of cash equal to 100% of the principal plus accrued but unpaid interest up to but not including the date of repurchase. The repurchase notice given by each holder electing repurchase may be withdrawn by the holder by written notice of withdrawal delivered prior to the close of business on the date of repurchase. The proceeds from these Convertible Notes were used to reduce borrowings under the Facility by approximately $25 million.
Holders may surrender Convertible Notes for conversion into cash and shares of our common stock prior to the Convertible Notes' maturity date in the following circumstances: i) during any calendar quarter commencing after the issuance of the Convertible Notes, if our common stock price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the calendar quarter preceding the quarter in which the conversion occurs is more than 110% of the conversion price per share of our common stock in effect on that 30th trading day; ii) if we have called the particular Convertible Notes for redemption and the redemption has not yet occurred; iii) during the five trading day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes for each day of such five-day period was less than 95% of the product of the closing sale price of our common stock on that day multiplied by 82.0345 (the "Conversion Rate"); or iv) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.
Upon the occurrence of the circumstances described above, holders may convert any outstanding notes into cash and shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price per share of $12.19. Subject to certain exceptions, at the time notes are tendered for conversion, the value (the "Conversion Value") of the cash and shares of our common stock, if any, to be received by a holder converting
IV-82
$1,000 principal amount of the notes will be determined by multiplying the Conversion Rate by the ten-day average closing stock price of our common stock. We will deliver the Conversion Value to holders as follows: i) an amount in cash (the "Principal Return") equal to the lesser of (a) the Conversion Value and (b) the principal amount of the notes to be converted and, if the Conversion Value is greater than the Principal Return, ii) an amount in shares equal to the Conversion Value less the Principal Return ("the Net Share Amount"). The number of Net Shares to be paid will be determined by dividing the Net Share Amount by the ten day average closing stock price of our common stock.
Metrix has a $500 thousand revolving credit facility with a lender. This facility matures on December 16, 2005 and is governed by a borrowing base. Magnum Hunter is a guarantor to this facility. As of December 31, 2004, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.
In November 1996, we entered into a production payment conveyance. We received a production payment amount of $750 thousand and agreed to make payments of up to 50% of the monthly net revenue proceeds received from certain oil and gas properties. The balance owed under the conveyance was $12 thousand at December 31, 2003 and was paid in full in 2004.
NOTE 6—INCOME TAXES
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", which requires the recognition of a liability or asset, net of a valuation allowance, for the deferred tax consequences of all temporary differences between the tax bases and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and for the future benefit of operating loss carryforwards. The following is a reconciliation of income tax expense reported in the statement of operations (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax expense at statutory rates | |||||||||||
| Federal tax expense | $ | 55,766 | $ | 14,550 | $ | 4,847 | |||||
| State tax expense | 1,912 | 229 | 403 | ||||||||
| Adjustment of deferred state tax rate | (4,811 | ) | — | — | |||||||
| Change in valuation allowance | 2,042 | — | (7,100 | ) | |||||||
| Other | 850 | 434 | 259 | ||||||||
| Tax expense (benefit) | $ | 55,759 | $ | 15,213 | $ | (1,591 | ) | ||||
IV-83
The tax effects of significant temporary differences and carryforwards are as follows (in thousands):
| |
December 31, |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
| Property and equipment, including intangible drilling costs | $ | (236,580 | ) | $ | (184,713 | ) | ||
| Plugging costs and other | (1,730 | ) | — | |||||
| Total deferred tax liability | $ | (238,310 | ) | $ | (184,713 | ) | ||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 1,294 | $ | 1,105 | ||||
| Depletion carryforwards | 1,147 | 1,200 | ||||||
| Derivative instruments | 7,175 | 9,570 | ||||||
| Alternative minimum tax credit | 278 | — | ||||||
| Employee stock options | 877 | — | ||||||
| Operating loss and other carryforwards | 45,849 | 40,073 | ||||||
| Other | 376 | 28 | ||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | $ | 56,996 | $ | 51,976 | ||||
| Valuation allowance on state NOL carryforwards | (2,042 | ) | — | |||||
| Net Deferred Tax Liability | $ | (183,356 | ) | $ | (132,737 | ) | ||
During 2004, an adjustment was made to lower deferred state income taxes payable by $4.8 million to reflect a change in our deferred state income tax rate from 2.875% to 1.2%, due to an increase in income not subject to state income taxes. In addition, during 2004, a valuation allowance of $2 million was established for state NOL carryforwards, due primarily to a five-year state carryforward limitation, and the likelihood that these NOL's would not be realized before expiration.
Magnum Hunter and our subsidiaries have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $113.8 million that expire, if unused, in years 2012 through 2023. Current tax laws and regulations relating to specified changes in ownership limit the utilization of our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A change in ownership of greater than 50% of a corporation within a three-year period causes the annual limitations to be placed in effect. Such a change is deemed to have occurred February 3, 1999 in connection with the purchase of preferred stock by ONEOK Resources Company, which has subsequently been either redeemed or converted to common stock. Approximately $51.4 million of the net operating losses are subject to a limitation of $7.8 million per year. We also have $9.5 million of net operating losses subject to a limitation of $3.7 million per year as a result of the merger with Prize Energy Corp. on March 15, 2002. In addition, we have depletion carryforwards of $3.2 million with no expiration period.
NOTE 7—STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock
Shares of preferred stock may be issued in such series, with such designations, preferences, stated values, rights, qualifications or limitations as determined solely by the Board of Directors. Of the 10,000,000 shares of $.001 par value preferred stock we are authorized to issue, 216,000 shares have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 1,000,000 shares have been designated as 1996 Series A
IV-84
convertible preferred stock and 50,000 shares have been designated as 1999 Series A 8% convertible preferred stock. Thus, 8,734,000 preferred shares have been authorized for issuance but have not been issued nor have the rights of these preferred shares been designated. No dividends can be paid on the common stock until the dividend requirements of the preferred shares have been satisfied. The preferred shareholders are not entitled to vote except on those matters in which the consent of the holders of preferred stock is specifically required by Nevada law. If we were to liquidate prior to payment of the full dividend requirements on the preferred stock, the preferred stock would receive a liquidation preference from the liquidation proceeds. On liquidation, holders of all series of the preferred stock would be entitled to receive the par value, $.001 per share, in preference to the common stock shareholders.
Dividend payments and preferential rights to Series A preferred shareholders are tied to wells that have been plugged and abandoned. The liquidation value of the Series A Preferred Stock is $216.
On December 23, 1996, we issued 1,000,000 shares of new Series A Preferred Stock, known as the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock, in a private placement, resulting in net proceeds after offering costs of $9.3 million. Dividends of $438 thousand and $875 thousand were declared in 2000 and 1999, respectively. On June 30, 2000 the holders of the 1996 Series A convertible preferred stock agreed to exchange the convertible preferred securities for 900 thousand warrants to purchase restricted common shares of our stock at an exercise price of $5.25 per share with an expiration date of June 3, 2003 and payment of $10 million. The convertible preferred shares are currently listed as issued but held by Canvasback as of December 31, 2004.
Warrants
The following is a summary of warrant activity for the periods ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Number of Warrants |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number of Warrants |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number of Warrants |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||
| Outstanding—Beginning of Year | 7,228,457 | $ | 15.00 | 7,873,206 | $ | 14.32 | 644,749 | $ | 6.75 | ||||||
| Issued | — | — | — | — | 11,500,270 | 12.80 | |||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | (644,749 | ) | 6.75 | (578 | ) | 9.12 | |||||||
| Redeemed | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Expired | — | — | — | — | (4,271,235 | ) | 9.09 | ||||||||
| Outstanding—End of Year | 7,228,457 | $ | 15.00 | 7,228,457 | $ | 15.00 | 7,873,206 | $ | 14.32 | ||||||
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors allowed a total of 644,749 warrants held by certain key officers and directors with an exercise price of $6.50 per share and an expiration date of June 30, 2000, to be exchanged for an equal number of new warrants with an exercise price of $6.75 per share expiring on December 31, 2003. The exercise price of the new warrants was fair market value on the date of the new grant. All of these warrants were exercised during 2003.
On December 5, 2001, we announced that a distribution of one warrant for every five shares of common stock owned on January 10, 2002. 7,228,457 warrants were distributed on March 21, 2002.
IV-85
Each new warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $15. The warrants will expire three years from the date of distribution, unless extended by the Board of Directors.
We also converted outstanding Prize warrants into Magnum Hunter stock warrants pursuant to the merger (see Note 2). We distributed 4,271,813 of these warrants on March 15, 2002, at a weighted average exercise price of $9.09. These warrants expired in June and November 2002.
Common Stock
We have a Shareholder Rights Plan, under which the Rights initially represent the right to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of 1998 Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for $35.00 per one one-hundredth of a share. The Rights become exercisable only if a person or a group acquires or commences a tender offer for 15% or more of our common stock. Until they become exercisable, the Rights attach to and trade with our common stock. The Rights expire January 20, 2008.
We have not previously paid any cash dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to reinvest all available funds for the development and growth of our business. In addition, our Facility and the indenture governing our 9.6% Senior Notes restrict the payment of cash dividends on our common stock.
On May 1, 2002, our Board of Directors announced an expansion of our existing stock repurchase program established in June 2001. Under this program, we and our affiliates are authorized to repurchase up to two million shares of our common stock. On October 17, 2002, our Board of Directors approved a new three million share repurchase program in addition to our June 2001 program. At December 31, 2004, approximately 4.2 million shares had been repurchased under these two programs, and approximately 818 thousand shares remained available for repurchase.
On March 15, 2002, we issued 34.1 million shares at a value of $257.2 million pursuant to our merger with Prize. See Note 2 for further discussion on the Prize merger.
On June 30, 2004, we sold 15 million shares of Magnum Hunter common stock at $10.25 per share under a previously filed universal shelf registration statement. The proceeds from this issuance were $147.2 million, net of offering costs. We also granted the underwriters an option to purchase an additional 2.25 million shares to cover over-allotments, which they exercised on July 2, 2004. The net proceeds from this sale were approximately $22.1 million. We used proceeds from these issuances to finance a portion of our acquisition of oil and gas properties in the state of New Mexico (see Note 2) and to redeem a portion of our 9.6% Senior Notes (see Note 5).
We issued 2.1 million, 270 thousand and 985 thousand shares pursuant to employee stock option exercises for proceeds of $10.4 million, $1.2 million and $3.6 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Upon the exercise of warrants, we issued 548 thousand treasury shares for proceeds of $3.4 million during 2003. Of the treasury shares issued for warrants in 2003, 37 thousand shares were issued in a cashless exercise of 134 thousand warrants. No warrants were exercised in 2004.
Our KSOP purchased 225 thousand, 486 thousand and 532 thousand shares at costs of $2.3 million, $2.7 million and $3.7 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. During the same periods, the KSOP released shares totaling 357 thousand, 231 thousand and 244 thousand to participants. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, we made new loans to the KSOP of $2.3 million, $2.7 million
IV-86
and $3.7 million and the KSOP repaid loan amounts of $2.2 million, $1.5 million, and $1.3 million, respectively. Of the 2004 repayments, $1.3 million represented our contribution of 223 thousand shares to the plan. Of the 2003 repayments, $1.1 million represented our contribution of 172 thousand shares to the KSOP plan. Additionally, in 2002, we contributed 158 thousand shares to our 401(K) plan.
NOTE 8—SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
During 2004, we contributed 223 thousand shares of our common stock valued at a cost of $1.3 million to our KSOP plan. Interest paid on our outstanding indebtedness was $49.7 million. Tax payments in 2004 were $2.6 million.
During 2003, we contributed 172 thousand shares of our common stock valued at a cost of $1.1 million to our KSOP plan. Interest paid on our outstanding indebtedness was $55.2 million. Tax refunds received in 2003 were $8.1 million, net of payments.
During 2002, we contributed 158 thousand shares at a cost of $867 thousand to our KSOP plan. Interest paid on our outstanding indebtedness was $48.4 million. Taxes paid in 2002 were $666 thousand. We also completed the Prize merger by issuing 34.1 million shares of common stock valued at $257.2 million and 4.3 million warrants valued at $3.4 million.
NOTE 9—ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
We may become subject to certain liabilities as they relate to environmental clean up of well sites or other environmental restoration procedures as they relate to the drilling of oil and gas wells and the operation thereof. In our acquisition of existing or previously drilled well bores, we may not be aware of what environmental safeguards were taken at the time such wells were drilled or during the time that such wells were operated. Should it be determined that a liability exists with respect to any environmental clean up or restoration, the liability to cure such a violation would most likely fall upon the company. In certain acquisitions, we have received contractual warranties that no such violations exist, while in other acquisitions, we have waived our rights to pursue a claim for such violations from the selling party. No claim has been made nor has a claim been asserted. We are not aware of the existence of any material liability relating to any environmental clean-up, restoration or the violation of any rules or regulations relating thereto.
NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We have certain lease agreements for the use of office space, office equipment, and vehicles. The Irving, Texas office space lease extends through November 2005, with an option to renew the lease for a three-year term, and the Grapevine, Texas office lease extends through December 2005. The various office equipment leases extend until 2007. The various vehicle leases extend until 2012. The leases have
IV-87
been classified as operating leases. The following is a schedule by years of future minimum lease payments required under the operating lease agreements (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31: | ||||
| 2005 | $ | 2,381 | ||
| 2006 | 1,129 | |||
| 2007 | 950 | |||
| 2008 | 751 | |||
| 2009 | 559 | |||
| Thereafter | 762 | |||
| Total Minimum Payments Required | $ | 6,532 | ||
Rental expense was $2.3 million, $2.3 million, and $2.2 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
In the past we have provided trade guarantees on behalf of an unconsolidated affiliate which has since been sold. The last of these guarantees expired in July 2003. On February 18, 2005 our 40% owned subsidiary, Apple Tree Holdings, LLC entered into a $20.6 million construction loan agreement ("Construction Loan"). The Construction Loan provides financing for the construction of a processing plant, natural gas lateral, carbon dioxide line and related infrastructure in Huerfano County, Colorado. The Construction loan bears interest at either LIBOR plus 2.25% or a base rate plus 1.25% and will mature no later than July 31, 2006. We have provided a guaranty to the lender for this Construction Loan. In return for our guaranty, we received an up-front cash payment as well as 55% distribution of cash flows from the entity until certain financial tests are met. In the event that the Construction Loan goes into default and Magnum Hunter has to pay on the guaranty, we will have recourse against the project and related subsidiaries.
NOTE 11—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments that subject Magnum Hunter to credit risk consist principally of accounts and notes receivable. The receivables are primarily from companies in the oil and gas business or from individual oil and gas investors. These parties are primarily located in the Southwestern region of the United States. No single receivable is considered to be sufficiently material as to constitute a concentration. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded $841 thousand in additional allowances for doubtful accounts. During the year ended December 31, 2003 we recorded $231 thousand in additional allowances for doubtful accounts. We do not ordinarily require collateral, but in the case of receivables for joint operations, we often have the ability to offset amounts due against the participant's share of production from the related property. We believe the allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2004 is adequate.
Under our hedging programs, to the extent we receive the spread between the contract floor and the index price applied to related contract volumes, we have a credit risk in the event of nonperformance of the counterparty to the agreement. We do not anticipate any material impact to our results of operations as a result of nonperformance by such parties.
Management estimates the market values of notes receivable and payable based on expected cash flows. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, we provided a reserve for the carrying value of a note
IV-88
receivable of $1.2 million. After establishing this reserve, management believes those market values approximate carrying values at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The market values of equity investments are based upon quoted market prices (see Note 1). At December 31, 2004, the fair value of our debt was equal to its carrying value, except for the 9.6% Senior Notes and Convertible Notes. The fair value of the 9.6% Senior Notes was $221.3 million and the fair value of the Convertible Notes was $151.7 million.
NOTE 12—COMMODITY DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Hedges
Periodically, we enter into futures, options, and swap contracts to mitigate the effects of significant fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices. At December 31, 2004, we had open contracts with the following terms:
| Commodity |
Type |
Volume/Day |
Duration |
Wtd. Avg. Price |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas | Collar | 60,000 MMBTU | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $4.21 - $6.85 | ||||
| Natural Gas | Swap | 20,000 MMBTU | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $6.25 | ||||
| Natural Gas | Collar | 20,000 MMBTU | Jan 06 - Dec 06 | $5.25 - $6.30 | ||||
| Crude Oil | Swap | 1,000 BBL | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $34.90 | ||||
| Crude Oil | Collar | 1,000 BBL | Jan 05 - Dec 05 | $35.00 - $55.00 | ||||
| Crude Oil | Collar | 1,000 BBL | Jan 06 - Dec 06 | $30.00 - $35.85 |
At December 31, 2004, based on future market prices, the fair value of our open commodity derivative contracts were as follows (in thousands):
| Derivative Assets | ||||
| Natural gas collars | $ | 207 | ||
| Total derivative assets | $ | 207 | ||
Derivative Liabilities |
||||
| Natural gas collars | $ | (13,847 | ) | |
| Natural gas swaps | (528 | ) | ||
| Crude oil collars | (2,343 | ) | ||
| Crude oil swaps | (3,310 | ) | ||
| Total derivative liabilities | $ | (20,028 | ) | |
| Net derivative liabilities | $ | (19,821 | ) | |
In conjunction with the Prize merger in March 2002, we acquired ten natural gas derivative contracts for the periods April 2002 through December 2004. We also acquired seven crude oil derivative contracts for the periods March 2002 through December 2003. We recorded a derivative asset of $7.6 million to reflect the fair value of these contracts at the merger date. In June 2002, we closed one of the derivative contracts procured in the Prize merger, realizing proceeds of $3.6 million, which were charged against derivative assets. The net derivative balance of $4.0 million was amortized as a charge to other non-cash hedging adjustments over the remaining life of the derivative contracts.
IV-89
At December 31, 2004, we had five crude oil derivatives and seven natural gas derivatives, which are categorized in the tables above. The net fair value of these derivatives was $19.8 million, recognized as a $207 thousand derivative asset and a $20.0 million derivative liability. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the consolidated statement of operations includes a loss of $21.8 million related to crude oil derivatives and a loss of $23.2 million related to natural gas derivatives, including amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The consolidated statement of operations also included a non-cash hedging ineffectiveness gain of $332 thousand related to crude oil and natural gas derivatives and a non-cash gain of $792 million related to the amortization of hedge contracts acquired in the Prize merger. It is estimated at this time that $8.8 million of other comprehensive loss will be reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations during the next 12 months.
Net losses related to crude oil and natural gas derivative transactions for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $43.9 million, $72.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively.
NOTE 13—STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
We have four stock compensation plans for our employees and directors, (i) the Magnum Hunter Resources 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan, (the "KSOP"), (ii) the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Option Plan"), and (iii) the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Option Plan"). In addition, we made non-incentive stock option grants in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
KSOP
We established an ESOP and a related trust in 1996 as a long-term benefit for our employees. On January 1, 2001, the ESOP was merged with the 401(k) plan to form the KSOP. Under terms of the KSOP, eligible participants may choose to make elective deferred contributions of not less than 1% or more than 15% of their annual compensation, limited in combination with the 401(k) plan to the maximum allowable per year by the Internal Revenue Code. Company contributions to the KSOP are made on a discretionary basis. It is also our intent to invest all employer contributions in our common stock. All employees who have reached the age of 21 and have one year of service, are eligible to participate in the plan. Shares purchased by the KSOP with loans from the company are released to participants as company contributions and participant salary deferrals are made and the related loans are repaid. We have no repurchase obligations with respect to released shares.
During 2004, we loaned the KSOP $2.3 million to purchase 224,600 shares of our common stock on the open market at an average price of $10.06 per share. During 2004, employees purchased 133,638 shares of the KSOP's unreleased shares at an average price of $6.04 per share through salary deferrals. Employee purchases totaled $807 thousand, which the KSOP used to repay that portion of its outstanding loan, and 133,638 shares were allocated among the Plan participants. We contributed $1.3 million to the KSOP in December 2004 as a discretionary contribution under the Plan. The KSOP then repaid that portion of its outstanding loan and 223,081 shares were allocated among participants.
During 2003, we loaned the KSOP $2.7 million to purchase 485,622 shares of our common stock on the open market at an average price of $5.58 per share. During 2003, employees purchased 58,797 shares of the KSOP's unreleased shares at an average price of $6.46 per share through salary deferrals. Employee purchases totaled $380 thousand, which the KSOP used to repay that portion of its outstanding loan, and 58,797 shares were allocated among the Plan participants. We contributed
IV-90
$1.1 million to the KSOP in December 2003 as a discretionary contribution under the Plan. The KSOP then repaid that portion of its outstanding loan and 171,868 shares were allocated among participants.
During 2002, we loaned the KSOP $3.7 million to purchase 532,400 shares of our common stock on the open market at an average price of $6.86 per share. During 2002, employees purchased 86,147 shares of the KSOP's unreleased shares at an average price of $5.50 per share through salary deferrals. Employee purchases totaled $473 thousand, which the KSOP used to repay that portion of its outstanding loan, and 86,147 shares were allocated among the Plan participants. We contributed $867 thousand to the KSOP in December 2002, as a discretionary contribution under the Plan. The KSOP then repaid that portion of its outstanding loan and 157,659 shares were allocated among participants.
The KSOP loan is interest-free and due December 31, 2005. The loan was secured by 880,083 shares and 1,012,203 shares of our common stock at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As required under Statement of Position 93-6 "Employers Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans", compensation expense is recorded for shares committed to be released to employees based on the fair market value of those shares when they are committed to be released. The difference between cost and the fair market value of the committed to be released shares is recorded in additional paid-in-capital. Unreleased shares held by the KSOP are excluded from the calculation of earnings per share.
The KSOP shares are summarized as follows:
| |
December 31, |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
| Allocated shares | 1,289,981 | 1,072,128 | |||||
| Unreleased shares | 880,083 | 1,012,203 | |||||
| Total KSOP shares | 2,170,064 | 2,084,331 | |||||
| Fair value of unreleased shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively | $ | 11,353,071 | $ | 9,626,051 | |||
The KSOP expense for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $3.6 million, $1.6 million, and $997 thousand, respectively.
Stock Option Plans
Incentive Stock Option Plan
We established this plan beginning April 1, 1996. It is governed by Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, and Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This stock option plan covers 1,200,000 shares of our common stock. Eligibility is limited to employees and directors of Magnum Hunter and our subsidiaries. The actual selection of grantees is made by the Board of Directors. The term of the individual option grants, while at the discretion of the Board, was five years. All options granted in 1996 were fully vested and exercisable when granted. The exercise price was fair market value at the date of each grant.
IV-91
Non-Incentive Stock Option Grants
During 2002, the Board granted 2,059,750 new stock options to employees at a weighted average price of $5.61 per share, of which 20% vested at the date of grant, with the balance vesting an additional 20% per year on the anniversary date, with a weighted average term of 9.9 years. The exercise price was the fair market value on the date of grant.
On June 20, 2003, the Board granted 999,260 new stock options to employees as part of the 2003 compensation package. These options carry an exercise price of $5.92 and were fully vested on December 31, 2003. They will expire June 20, 2006. During 2003, we also issued 113,000 options to certain employees and board members. These options carry a weighted average exercise price of $5.675 and have a weighted average remaining life of 8.2 years.
On July 1, 2004, the Board granted 1,336,500 new stock options to employees as part of the 2004 compensation package. These options carry an exercise price of $10.48 and were unvested on December 31, 2004. They will expire July 1, 2009. During 2004, we also issued 116,500 options to certain employees and board members. These options carry a weighted average exercise price of $9.70 and have a weighted average remaining life of 6.39 years.
The following is a summary of stock option activity under the Option Plans:
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||
| Outstanding—Beginning of Year | 6,740,764 | $ | 6.36 | 6,044,800 | $ | 6.37 | 5,217,584 | $ | 6.22 | ||||||
| Granted | 1,453,000 | 10.41 | 1,112,260 | 5.90 | 2,059,750 | 5.61 | |||||||||
| Exercised | (2,128,412 | ) | 4.90 | (269,862 | ) | 4.46 | (983,834 | ) | 3.71 | ||||||
| Cancelled | (127,250 | ) | 6.28 | (146,434 | ) | 6.58 | (248,700 | ) | 7.47 | ||||||
| Outstanding—End of Year | 5,938,102 | $ | 7.88 | 6,740,764 | $ | 6.36 | 6,044,800 | $ | 6.37 | ||||||
| Exercisable—End of Year | 3,483,419 | $ | 7.29 | 4,624,614 | $ | 6.21 | 2,775,770 | $ | 6.04 | ||||||
IV-92
The following is a summary of stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
| Exercise Price |
Number of Options Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) |
Number of Exercisable Options |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.01 | 46,000 | 7.74 | 26,000 | |||
| 5.20 | 9,000 | 7.58 | 3,000 | |||
| 5.23 | 2,600 | 7.75 | — | |||
| 5.38 | 1,190,084 | 7.69 | 555,851 | |||
| 5.45 | 100,000 | 7.72 | 80,000 | |||
| 5.46 | 3,000 | 8.15 | — | |||
| 5.61 | 1,800 | 8.22 | — | |||
| 5.82 | 3,000 | 7.66 | 1,800 | |||
| 5.92 | 547,128 | 1.47 | 547,128 | |||
| 6.625 | 8,000 | 0.56 | 8,000 | |||
| 7.20 | 3,000 | 8.42 | — | |||
| 7.51 | 12,000 | 7.30 | 4,000 | |||
| 7.55 | 88,700 | 7.21 | 46,500 | |||
| 7.57 | 15,000 | 7.42 | 9,000 | |||
| 7.75 | 5,000 | 7.22 | 3,000 | |||
| 7.90 | 6,000 | 8.48 | — | |||
| 7.9375 | 1,169,540 | 5.94 | 1,169,540 | |||
| 7.95 | 10,000 | 8.74 | 4,000 | |||
| 8.44 | 1,254,500 | 6.95 | 979,600 | |||
| 8.50 | 8,000 | 6.67 | 4,000 | |||
| 9.19 | 30,000 | 9.17 | 6,000 | |||
| 9.3125 | 20,000 | 0.97 | 20,000 | |||
| 10.48 | 1,378,250 | 4.50 | — | |||
| 11.08 | 20,000 | 6.25 | 16,000 | |||
| 12.00 | 1,000 | 1.05 | — | |||
| 12.89 | 6,500 | 4.88 | — | |||
| 5,938,102 | 5.84 | 3,483,419 | ||||
Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the prospective method for expensing stock option grants under SFAS No. 148 and SFAS No. 123. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded expense of $768 thousand for our current year's grants. For grants made prior to January 1, 2003, we continue to follow the disclosures only portion of SFAS No. 123 and continue to apply the provisions of APB No. 25, which applies the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. See Note 1 for disclosure of pro forma earnings assuming adoption of SFAS No. 123.
Deferred Compensation Plan
In March 2003, the company implemented and adopted the 2003 Bonus Deferral Plan. This plan allows eligible participants to defer all or a portion of their annual bonuses until a later date. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the participants who are eligible to make deferral elections under the plan. The bonuses that are subject to the plan are those bonuses
IV-93
determined by or under the authority of the Board of Directors and are based upon the performance of the company during a fiscal year. The amount to be deferred, as specified by any participant, shall be invested solely in common stock of the company. Participants may designate the date on which shares of common stock covered by a deferral election shall be distributed, provided that such distribution date is at least twelve months after the date such deferral election was made. During 2003, we purchased approximately 53 thousand shares at a cost of $295 thousand, contributed approximately 18 thousand treasury shares with a market value of $100 thousand, and released approximately 36 thousand shares of participants who elected not to defer under the plan. We were holding approximately 34 thousand shares in the plan at December 31, 2003. During 2004, no activity occurred in the plan; therefore, we were holding approximately 34 thousand shares in the plan at December 31, 2004.
NOTE 14—EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Mr. Gary C. Evans, Mr. Richard R. Frazier, Mr. M. Bradley Davis, Mr. R. Douglas Cronk, Mr. Charles R. Erwin and Mr. Morgan F. Johnston each have employment agreements with the company. Mr. Evans' agreement terminates January 1, 2006 and continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis and provides for a salary of $300,000 per annum, unless increased by the Board. Mr. Evans' salary for the year 2005 is $475,000. Mr. Frazier's agreement terminates January 1, 2006 and continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis and provides for a salary of $175,000 per annum unless increased by the Board. Mr. Frazier's salary for the year 2005 is $300,000. Mr. Davis' agreement terminates January 1, 2006 and continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis and provides for a salary of $190,000 per annum, unless increased by the Board. Mr. Davis' salary for the year 2005 is $200,000. Mr. Cronk's agreement terminates January 1, 2006 and continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis and provides for a salary of $167,500 per annum, unless increased by the Board. Mr. Cronk's salary for the year 2005 is $200,000. Mr. Erwin's agreement terminates January 1, 2006 and continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis and provides for a salary of $185,000 per annum unless increased by the Board. Mr. Erwin's salary for the year 2005 is $225,000. Mr. Johnston's agreement terminates January 1, 2006 and continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis and provides for a salary of $180,000 per annum unless increased by the Board. Mr. Johnston's salary for the year 2005 is $195,000. All of the agreements provide that the same benefits supplied to other company employees shall be available to the employee. The employment agreements also contain, among other things, covenants by the employee that in the event of termination, he will not compete with the company in certain geographical areas or hire any of our employees for a period of two years after cessation of employment.
In addition, all of the agreements contain a provision that upon a change in control, the employee's position is terminated, or the employee leaves for "good cause", the employee is entitled to receive immediately, in one lump sum, certain compensation. In the case of Mr. Evans and Mr. Frazier, the employee shall receive three times the employee's current base salary and bonus, plus any other compensation received by him in the last fiscal year. In the case of Mr. Davis, Mr. Cronk, Mr. Erwin and Mr. Johnston, the employee shall receive two times the employee's base salary and bonus, plus any other compensation received by him in the last fiscal year. Also, any medical, dental and group life insurance covering the employee and his dependents shall continue until the earlier of (i) 12 months after the change in control or (ii) the date the employee becomes a participant in the group insurance
IV-94
benefit program of a new employer. We also have key man life insurance on Mr. Evans in the amount of $12,000,000.
NOTE 15—SEGMENT DATA
We have three reportable segments. The Exploration and Production segment is engaged in exploratory drilling and acquisition, production, and sale of crude oil, condensate, and natural gas. The Gas Gathering, Marketing and Processing segment is engaged in the gathering and compression of natural gas from the wellhead, the purchase and resale of natural gas, which it gathers, and the processing of natural gas liquids. The Oil Field Services segment is engaged in the managing, operation, and monitoring of producing oil and gas properties for interest owners.
Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each business requires different technology and marketing strategies. The Exploration and Production segment has six geographic areas that are aggregated. The Gas Gathering, Marketing and Processing segment includes the activities of the five gathering systems and four natural gas liquids processing plants in two geographic areas that are aggregated. The Oil Field Services segment has six geographic areas that are aggregated. The reason for aggregating the segments, in each case, was due to the similarity in nature of the products, the production processes, the type of customers, the method of distribution, and the regulatory environments.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. We evaluate performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes. The accounting for intersegment sales and transfers is done as if the sales or transfers were to third parties, that is, at current market prices.
IV-95
Segment data for the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):
| 2004: |
Exploration & Production |
Gas Gathering, Marketing & Processing |
Oil Field Services |
All Other |
Elimination |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from external customers | $ | 443,412 | $ | 41,900 | $ | 8,414 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 493,726 | |||||||
| Intersegment revenues | 1,972 | 26,275 | 14,700 | — | (42,947 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 123,567 | 2,363 | 1,136 | 113 | 127,179 | ||||||||||||||
| Segment profit (loss) | 215,196 | 10,425 | 2,262 | (21,950 | ) | 205,933 | |||||||||||||
| Equity losses of affiliates | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (38,059 | ) | (38,059 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt | (12,250 | ) | (12,250 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Other income | 3,708 | 3,708 | |||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 159,332 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Current income tax expense | (1,977 | ) | (1,977 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Deferred income tax expense | (53,782 | ) | (53,782 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | 103,573 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures (net of asset sales) | $ | 513,844 | $ | 2,458 | $ | 810 | $ | 517,112 | |||||||||||
2003: |
Exploration & Production |
Gas Gathering, Marketing & Processing |
Oil Field Services |
All Other |
Elimination |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from external customers | $ | 284,929 | $ | 35,317 | $ | 4,768 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 325,014 | |||||||
| Intersegment revenues | 1,738 | 23,111 | 13,649 | — | (38,498 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 96,086 | 2,320 | 604 | 604 | 99,614 | ||||||||||||||
| Segment profit (loss) | 99,809 | 7,624 | 1,045 | (15,780 | ) | 92,698 | |||||||||||||
| Equity losses of affiliates | (162 | ) | (162 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (47,260 | ) | (47,260 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt | (6,716 | ) | (6,716 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Other income | 2,371 | 2,371 | |||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 40,931 | |||||||||||||||||
| Current income tax benefit | 250 | 250 | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred income tax expense | (15,463 | ) | (15,463 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 399 | 399 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 26,117 | |||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures (net of asset sales) | $ | 157,481 | $ | 199 | $ | 566 | $ | 166 | $ | 158,412 | |||||||||
IV-96
2002: |
Exploration & Production |
Gas Gathering, Marketing & Processing |
Oil Field Services |
All Other |
Elimination |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from external customers | $ | 240,964 | $ | 20,809 | $ | 4,096 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 265,869 | |||||||
| Intersegment revenues | 1,647 | 14,052 | 14,128 | (29,827 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 82,950 | 2,066 | 507 | 945 | — | 86,468 | |||||||||||||
| Segment profit (loss) | 78,288 | 3,643 | 1,115 | (14,177 | ) | 68,869 | |||||||||||||
| Equity earnings of affiliates | 792 | 792 | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (47,935 | ) | (47,935 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Costs associated with early retirement of debt | (1,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for non-cash impairment of investments | (621 | ) | (621 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Other income (loss) | (6,174 | ) | (6,174 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 13,931 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred income tax benefit | 1,591 | 1,591 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 15,522 | |||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures (net of asset sales) | $ | 643,683 | $ | 21,309 | $ | 843 | $ | 2,153 | $ | 667,988 | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2004 |
Exploration & Production |
Gas Gathering, Marketing & Processing |
Oil Field Services |
All Other |
Elimination |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment assets | $ | 1,616,712 | $ | 32,346 | $ | 18,855 | $ | 34,588 | $ | 1,702,501 | |||||||
As of December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment assets | $ | 1,142,621 | $ | 30,710 | $ | 14,917 | $ | 77,644 | $ | 1,265,892 | |||||||
IV-97
NOTE 16—CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The company and its subsidiaries, except Canvasback and certain inconsequential subsidiaries, are direct guarantors of our 9.6% Senior Notes and our Convertible Notes, and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed these notes on a joint and several basis. In addition to not being a guarantor of these notes, Canvasback cannot be included in determining compliance with certain financial covenants under our credit agreements. Management has determined that separate financial statements relating to the Guarantors are not material to investors. Condensed consolidating balance sheets for Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and condensed consolidating statements of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
| |
December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
|||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||||||
| Current assets | $ | 146,219 | $ | 5,310 | $ | (12,015 | ) | $ | 139,514 | ||||
| Property and equipment (using full-cost accounting) | 1,490,881 | 6,031 | — | 1,496,912 | |||||||||
| Investment in subsidiaries (equity method) | 19,065 | — | (19,065 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Investment in Parent | — | 34,127 | (34,127 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Other assets | 65,924 | 151 | — | 66,075 | |||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 1,722,089 | $ | 45,619 | $ | (65,207 | ) | $ | 1,702,501 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 144,451 | 12,318 | (12,015 | ) | 144,754 | |||||||
| Long-term liabilities | 863,698 | 14,236 | — | 877,934 | |||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | 713,940 | 19,065 | (53,192 | ) | 679,813 | ||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 1,722,089 | $ | 45,619 | $ | (65,207 | ) | $ | 1,702,501 | ||||
IV-98
| |
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
||||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||||||
| Current assets | $ | 108,801 | $ | 18,163 | $ | (26,627 | ) | $ | 100,337 | ||||
| Property and equipment (using full-cost accounting) | 1,089,366 | 6,517 | — | 1,095,883 | |||||||||
| Investment in subsidiaries (equity method) | 17,875 | — | (17,875 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Investment in Parent | — | 34,127 | (34,127 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Other assets | 69,672 | — | — | 69,672 | |||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 1,285,714 | $ | 58,807 | $ | (78,629 | ) | $ | 1,265,892 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 104,806 | $ | 27,324 | $ | (26,627 | ) | $ | 105,503 | ||||
| Long-term liabilities | 757,105 | 13,608 | — | 770,713 | |||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | 423,803 | 17,875 | (52,002 | ) | 389,676 | ||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 1,285,714 | $ | 58,807 | $ | (78,629 | ) | $ | 1,265,892 | ||||
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
||||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 486,737 | $ | 8,002 | $ | (1,013 | ) | $ | 493,726 | ||||
| Expenses | 329,060 | 6,187 | (853 | ) | 334,394 | ||||||||
| Income before | 157,677 | 1,815 | (160 | ) | 159,332 | ||||||||
| Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | 1,058 | — | (1,058 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 158,735 | 1,815 | (1,218 | ) | 159,332 | ||||||||
| Income tax provision | (55,162 | ) | (657 | ) | 60 | (55,759 | ) | ||||||
| Net Income | $ | 103,573 | $ | 1,158 | $ | (1,158 | ) | $ | 103,573 | ||||
IV-99
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
||||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 320,335 | $ | 4,846 | $ | (167 | ) | $ | 325,014 | ||||
| Expenses | 282,945 | 1,264 | (126 | ) | 284,083 | ||||||||
| Income before | 37,390 | 3,582 | (41 | ) | 40,931 | ||||||||
| Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | 2,184 | — | (2,184 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 39,574 | 3,582 | (2,225 | ) | 40,931 | ||||||||
| Income tax provision | (13,856 | ) | (1,357 | ) | — | (15,213 | ) | ||||||
| Income before extraordinary loss | 25,718 | 2,225 | (2,225 | ) | 25,718 | ||||||||
| Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 399 | — | — | 399 | |||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 26,117 | $ | 2,225 | $ | (2,225 | ) | $ | 26,117 | ||||
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
|||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 264,152 | $ | 1,717 | $ | — | $ | 265,869 | ||||
| Expenses | 250,974 | 964 | — | 251,938 | ||||||||
| Income before | 13,178 | 753 | — | 13,931 | ||||||||
| Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | 468 | — | (468 | ) | — | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 13,646 | 753 | (468 | ) | 13,931 | |||||||
| Income tax (provision) benefit | 1,876 | (285 | ) | — | 1,591 | |||||||
| Net Income | $ | 15,522 | $ | 468 | $ | (468 | ) | $ | 15,522 | |||
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
||||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities | $ | 312,881 | $ | (12,271 | ) | $ | — | $ | 300,610 | ||||
| Cash flow used by investing activities | (513,692 | ) | (247 | ) | — | (513,939 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flow (used) provided by financing activities | 214,978 | — | — | 214,978 | |||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash | 14,167 | (12,518 | ) | — | 1,649 | ||||||||
| Cash at beginning of period | 3,482 | 15,211 | — | 18,693 | |||||||||
| Cash at end of period | $ | 17,649 | $ | 2,693 | $ | — | $ | 20,342 | |||||
IV-100
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
||||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities | $ | 148,019 | $ | 14,892 | $ | (273 | ) | $ | 162,638 | ||||
| Cash flow (used) provided by investing activities | (160,261 | ) | 6,008 | (5,422 | ) | (159,675 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flow (used) provided by financing activities | 13,184 | (6,218 | ) | 5,695 | 12,661 | ||||||||
| Net increase in cash | 942 | 14,682 | — | 15,624 | |||||||||
| Cash at beginning of period | 2,540 | 529 | — | 3,069 | |||||||||
| Cash at end of period | $ | 3,482 | $ | 15,211 | $ | — | $ | 18,693 | |||||
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. And Guarantor Subs |
Canvasback Energy, Inc. (Non Guarantor) |
Eliminations |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Consolidated |
||||||||||
| |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
||||||||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities | $ | 63,522 | $ | 19,881 | $ | — | $ | 83,403 | |||||
| Cash flow used by investing activities | (85,398 | ) | (4,022 | ) | — | (89,420 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flow (used) provided by financing activities | 23,686 | (17,355 | ) | — | 6,331 | ||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash | 1,810 | (1,496 | ) | — | 314 | ||||||||
| Cash at beginning of period | 730 | 2,025 | — | 2,755 | |||||||||
| Cash at end of period | $ | 2,540 | $ | 529 | $ | — | $ | 3,069 | |||||
IV-101
NOTE 17—SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY DATA (Unaudited)
The following tables set forth unaudited summary financial results on a quarterly basis for the two most recent years.
| |
2004 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 100,378 | $ | 110,036 | $ | 128,460 | $ | 154,852 | ||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 25,480 | 27,645 | 35,226 | 38,828 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | 40,608 | 44,963 | 52,255 | 68,107 | ||||||||
| Cost of early debt retirement | — | — | (12,250 | ) | — | |||||||
| Net Income | 19,262 | 23,230 | 18,964 | 42,117 | ||||||||
| Income per common share, basic | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.49 | ||||||||
| Income per common share, diluted | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
| |
2003 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 80,054 | $ | 78,438 | $ | 82,575 | $ | 83,947 | |||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | 21,524 | 24,978 | 26,682 | 26,430 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 25,914 | 21,444 | 21,153 | 24,187 | |||||||||
| Cost of early debt retirement | (1,855 | ) | (2,211 | ) | (19 | ) | (2,631 | ) | |||||
| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 399 | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net Income | 7,990 | 4,170 | 6,669 | 7,288 | |||||||||
| Income per common share, basic | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.11 | |||||||||
| Income per common share, diluted | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.11 | |||||
NOTE 18—RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED BY CIMAREX ENERGY
On January 26, 2005, Magnum Hunter and Cimarex Energy, Inc. announced that their respective boards of directors had approved an agreement and plan of merger that provides for the acquisition of Magnum Hunter by Cimarex. Closing is anticipated before the end of the second quarter in 2005, subject to customary regulatory approvals.
Under the terms of the proposed agreement, Magnum Hunter shareholders will receive 0.415 shares of Cimarex common stock for each share of Magnum Hunter common stock that they own. The merger is expected to be non-taxable to the shareholders of both companies. In addition to the merger consideration and prior to closing, Magnum Hunter intends to distribute its ownership interest in TEL Offshore Trust to its common stockholders as a special dividend.
Cimarex Energy Co., headquartered in Denver, CO, is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company with operations focused in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas of the U.S. Its principal operations offices are located in Tulsa, New Orleans and Houston.
IV-102
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
(Unaudited)
Proved oil and gas reserves consist of those estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
Estimates of petroleum reserves have been made by independent engineers and company employees. These estimates include reserves in which we hold an economic interest under production-sharing and other types of operating agreements. These estimates do not include probable or possible reserves. The estimated net interests in Proved Reserves are based upon subjective engineering judgments and may be affected by the limitations inherent in such estimation. The process of estimating reserves is subject to continual revision as additional information becomes available as a result of drilling, testing, reservoir studies and production history. There can be no assurance that such estimates will not be materially revised in subsequent periods. The revisions of previous estimates of our proved oil and gas reserves were primarily due to changes in commodity prices at December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 that impacted whether such reserves were economically recoverable. The impact of price changes disproportionately affects our long life reserves because of the more gradual decline curve of the applicable production.
We adopted FASB Statement 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("FAS 143") January 1, 2003. Among other things, FAS 143 requires the recognition of a liability for legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. The initial recognition of a liability for an asset retirement obligation increases the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by the same amount as the liability. In periods subsequent to the initial measurement, period-to-period changes in the liability are recognized for passage of time in the form of accretion expense as well as revisions to the original estimate. In accordance with FAS 143, we recorded a liability of $30.4 million, increased costs carried for our oil and gas properties by $25.4 million, and reduced our accumulated depletion by $5.6 million. During 2003, we incurred additional liabilities of $2.7 million, settled or sold liabilities of $1.2 million, and recorded accretion expense of $2.5 million. During 2004, we incurred additional liabilities of $7.3 million, settled or sold liabilities of $1.9 million, and recorded accretion expense of $2.9 million. We have included the initial costs recorded upon adoption of FAS 143 as well as the costs associated with the liabilities incurred during 2003 and 2004 in the carrying value of our oil and gas properties. Our accumulated depletion also reflects initial reduction as well as the depletion of these retirement costs during 2003 and 2004. We have included the cost associated with the liabilities incurred during 2003 and 2004 in our costs incurred analysis. Our results of operations include depletion on these retirement costs as well as the accretion expense related to the liability, and our discounted cash flows presented include our estimated futures costs of retiring our oil and gas properties.
IV-103
Estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves were as follows:
| |
Oil (Mbbl) |
Gas (MMcf) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2002 | |||||
| Proved Reserves | 63,082 | 458,644 | |||
| Proved Developed Reserves | 48,512 | 362,325 | |||
| December 31, 2003 | |||||
| Proved Reserves | 57,397 | 494,052 | |||
| Proved Developed Reserves | 42,989 | 368,530 | |||
| December 31, 2004 | |||||
| Proved Reserves | 66,081 | 610,118 | |||
| Proved Developed Reserves | 48,009 | 442,631 | |||
We included estimated quantities in the above table which we claim exclusively through our gas plant ownership. The amounts attributable to our ownership in gas plants are as follows:
| |
Oil (Mbbl) |
Gas (MMcf) |
NGL (Mbbl) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2002 | |||||||
| Proved Reserves | 127 | 8,359 | 4,529 | ||||
| Proved Developed Reserves | 122 | 8,031 | 4,180 | ||||
| December 31, 2003 | |||||||
| Proved Reserves | 197 | 9,513 | 4,090 | ||||
| Proved Developed Reserves | 167 | 9,162 | 3,637 | ||||
| December 31, 2004 | |||||||
| Proved Reserves | 136 | 9,769 | 4,948 | ||||
| Proved Developed Reserves | 127 | 9,419 | 4,398 | ||||
IV-104
The changes in proved reserves for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were as follows:
| |
Oil (Mbbl) |
Gas (MMcf) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reserves at December 31, 2001 | 21,601 | 248,480 | |||
| Purchase of minerals-in-place | 45,650 | 275,873 | |||
| Sale of minerals-in-place | (4,621 | ) | (75,034 | ) | |
| Extensions and discoveries | 2,986 | 53,939 | |||
| Production | (4,050 | ) | (46,487 | ) | |
| Revisions of estimates | 1,516 | 1,873 | |||
| Reserves at December 31, 2002 | 63,082 | 458,644 | |||
| Purchase of minerals-in-place | 26 | 67 | |||
| Sale of minerals-in-place | (1,243 | ) | (13,303 | ) | |
| Extensions and discoveries | 1,776 | 86,001 | |||
| Production | (3,893 | ) | (49,695 | ) | |
| Revisions of estimates | (2,351 | ) | 12,338 | ||
| Reserves at December 31, 2003 | 57,397 | 494,052 | |||
| Purchase of minerals-in-place | 8,324 | 135,017 | |||
| Sale of minerals-in-place | (196 | ) | (2,263 | ) | |
| Extensions and discoveries | 3,085 | 70,554 | |||
| Production | (4,080 | ) | (55,961 | ) | |
| Revisions of estimates | 1,551 | (31,281 | ) | ||
| Reserves at December 31, 2004 | 66,081 | 610,118 | |||
The aggregate amounts of capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities and the related accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unproved oil and gas properties | $ | 94,472 | $ | 110,467 | $ | 165,676 | |||||
| Proved properties | 1,828,839 | 1,292,388 | 1,053,426 | ||||||||
| Gross Capitalized Costs | 1,923,311 | 1,402,855 | 1,219,102 | ||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment | (458,731 | ) | (338,109 | ) | (250,515 | ) | |||||
| Net Capitalized Costs | $ | 1,464,580 | $ | 1,064,746 | $ | 968,587 | |||||
IV-105
Capitalized costs incurred in oil and gas producing activities during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property acquisition costs | |||||||||||
| Proved properties | $ | 297,957 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 460,908 | |||||
| Unproved properties | 19,515 | 12,213 | 147,024 | ||||||||
| Exploration costs | 52,743 | 36,788 | 34,310 | ||||||||
| Development costs | 166,484 | 125,308 | 91,521 | ||||||||
| Total Costs Incurred | $ | 536,699 | $ | 177,330 | $ | 733,763 | |||||
Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas production revenue | $ | 443,412 | $ | 284,929 | $ | 240,964 | ||||
| Production costs | (104,649 | ) | (89,034 | ) | (79,726 | ) | ||||
| Depreciation, depletion, amortization, impairment and accretion | (123,567 | ) | (96,087 | ) | (83,028 | ) | ||||
| Income taxes | (75,319 | ) | (34,933 | ) | (27,374 | ) | ||||
| Results of Operations for Producing Activities | $ | 139,877 | $ | 64,875 | $ | 50,836 | ||||
The standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future cash flows | $ | 6,133,855 | $ | 4,341,980 | $ | 3,728,575 | ||||
| Future development costs | (401,540 | ) | (295,273 | ) | (178,961 | ) | ||||
| Future production costs | (1,805,299 | ) | (1,318,811 | ) | (1,159,303 | ) | ||||
| Future net cash flows, before income tax | 3,927,016 | 2,727,896 | 2,390,311 | |||||||
| Future income taxes | (1,050,979 | ) | (712,167 | ) | (619,850 | ) | ||||
| Future Net Cash Flows | 2,876,037 | 2,015,729 | 1,770,461 | |||||||
| 10% annual discount | (1,312,440 | ) | (948,041 | ) | (800,652 | ) | ||||
| Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows | $ | 1,563,597 | $ | 1,067,688 | $ | 969,809 | ||||
IV-106
The primary changes in the standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands):
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchases of minerals-in-place | $ | 356,883 | $ | 676 | $ | 737,736 | ||||||
| Sales of minerals-in-place | (6,227 | ) | (44,759 | ) | (85,460 | ) | ||||||
| Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs | 82,750 | 262,022 | 167,334 | |||||||||
| Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs | (338,763 | ) | (195,895 | ) | (161,238 | ) | ||||||
| Development costs incurred during the period | 166,484 | 125,308 | 91,521 | |||||||||
| Revision of prior estimates: | ||||||||||||
| Net change in prices and costs | 353,969 | (79,252 | ) | 154,738 | ||||||||
| Change in quantity estimates | (60,379 | ) | (22,086 | ) | 18,007 | |||||||
| Accretion of discount | 106,769 | 96,981 | 30,569 | |||||||||
| Net change in income taxes | (165,577 | ) | (45,115 | ) | (289,091 | ) | ||||||
| Net Change | $ | 495,909 | $ | 97,880 | $ | 664,116 | ||||||
Estimated future cash inflows are computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas to year-end quantities of Proved Reserves. Estimated future development and production costs are determined by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions. Estimated future income tax expense is calculated by applying year-end statutory tax rates to estimated future pre-tax net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves, less the tax basis of the properties involved.
The assumptions used to compute the standardized measure are those prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and as such, do not necessarily reflect our expectations of actual revenues to be derived from those reserves nor their present worth. The limitations inherent in the reserve quantity estimation process are equally applicable to the standardized measure computations since these estimates are the basis for the valuation process.
IV-107
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)
| |
|
Additions |
|
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification |
Balance at Beginning of Year |
Charged to Costs and Expenses |
Charged to Other Accounts(1) |
Deductions(2) |
Balance at End of Year |
|||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts on Trade Accounts Receivable | $ | 4,331 | $ | 772 | $ | — | $ | (327 | ) | $ | 4,776 | |||||
| Reserve on Current Portion of Long-term Notes Receivable | 1,170 | — | — | $ | — | $ | 1,170 | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts on Trade Accounts Receivable | $ | 4,573 | $ | 231 | $ | 19 | $ | (492 | ) | $ | 4,331 | |||||
| Reserve on Current Portion of Long-term Notes Receivable | 1,620 | — | — | (450 | ) | 1,170 | ||||||||||
| Reserve on Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate | $ | 4,527 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,527 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts on Trade Accounts Receivable | $ | 3,264 | $ | 206 | $ | 1,103 | $ | — | $ | 4,573 | ||||||
| Reserve on Current Portion of Long-term Notes Receivable | 1,620 | — | — | — | 1,620 | |||||||||||
| Reserve on Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate | $ | 4,527 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,527 | ||||||
- (1)
- Allowances
acquired in Prize merger during 2002 and Metrix acquisition during 2003.
- (2)
- Write-offs
IV-108
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AMONG
CIMAREX ENERGY CO. ("PARENT"),
CIMAREX NEVADA ACQUISITION CO. ("MERGER SUB")
AND
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. ("COMPANY")
JANUARY 25, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A-i
A-ii
SCHEDULES
Company Disclosure Schedule
Parent Disclosure Schedule
EXHIBIT
5.10—Form of Affiliate Letter
A-iii
TABLE OF DEFINED TERMS
| 1996 Preferred | A-23 | |
| 1998 Preferred | A-23 | |
| 1999 Preferred | A-23 | |
| Affiliate | A-1 | |
| Agreement | A-1 | |
| Approved Budgets | A-61, A-64 | |
| Articles of Merger | A-1 | |
| Capital Expenditures | A-1 | |
| Capital Project | A-2 | |
| CERCLA | A-2 | |
| CERCLIS | A-2 | |
| Claim | A-74 | |
| Closing | A-2 | |
| Closing Date | A-2 | |
| Code | A-1 | |
| Company | A-1 | |
| Company Bank Credit Agreement | A-2 | |
| Company Benefit Program or Agreement | A-31 | |
| Company Certificate | A-2 | |
| Company Common Stock | A-2 | |
| Company Convertible Notes | A-2 | |
| Company Disclosure Schedule | A-2 | |
| Company Employee Benefit Plans | A-31 | |
| Company ERISA Affiliate | A-31 | |
| Company Financial Statements | A-3 | |
| Company Material Agreement(s) | A-3 | |
| Company Meeting | A-3 | |
| Company Permits | A-28 | |
| Company Plan | A-31 | |
| Company Preferred Stock | A-3 | |
| Company Proposal | A-3 | |
| Company Representative | A-4 | |
| Company Reserve Report | A-4 | |
| Company Rights | A-20 | |
| Company Rights Agreement | A-20 | |
| Company SEC Documents | A-23 | |
| Company Senior Secured Notes | A-4 | |
| Company Stock Option | A-3 | |
| Company Subsidiary(ies) | A-4 | |
| Company Warrant | A-4 | |
| Company's Oil And Gas Interests | A-7 | |
| Confidentiality Agreement | A-4 | |
| Continuing Employees | A-75 | |
| Control | A-1 | |
| Controlled By | A-1 | |
| Conversion Number | A-4 | |
| Defensible Title | A-4 | |
| Derivative Transaction | A-4 | |
| Disclosure Schedule | A-4 | |
| Dissenting Stockholder | A-4 | |
| Drilling or Completion Expenditures | A-5 | |
| Effective Time | A-20 | |
| Environmental Law | A-5 | |
| ERISA | A-5 | |
| Exchange Act | A-5 | |
| Exchange Agent | A-5 | |
| Exchange Fund | A-15 | |
| FERC | A-36 | |
| GAAP | A-5 | |
| Governmental Action | A-5 | |
| Governmental Authority | A-5 | |
| Hazardous Material | A-5 | |
| HSR Act | A-5 | |
| Hydrocarbons | A-6 | |
| Indemnified Parties | A-74 | |
| Indentures | A-80 | |
| IRS | A-32 | |
| KSOP | A-79 | |
| Laws | A-5 | |
| Lien | A-6 | |
| Market Price | A-6 | |
| Material Adverse Effect | A-6 | |
| Merger | A-12 | |
| Merger Consideration | A-13 | |
| Merger Sub | A-1 | |
| Merger Sub Common Stock | A-6 | |
| National Stock Exchange | A-6 | |
| NGA | A-36 | |
| Non-U.S. Holder | A-6 | |
| Notes | A-80 | |
| NRS | A-7 | |
| Oil and Gas Interest(s) | A-7 | |
| Oil and Gas Interests of Parent | A-7 | |
| Oil and Gas Interests of the Company | A-7 | |
| Option Consents | A-13 | |
| Ownership Interests | A-7 | |
| Parent | A-1 | |
| Parent Alternative Transaction | A-69 | |
| Parent Bank Credit Agreement | A-7 | |
| Parent Benefit Program or Agreement | A-49 | |
| Parent Certificate | A-7 | |
| Parent Common Stock | A-7 | |
| Parent Companies | A-7 | |
| Parent Disclosure Schedule | A-7 | |
| Parent Employee Benefit Plans | A-49 | |
| Parent ERISA Affiliate | A-49 | |
| Parent Financial Statements | A-8 | |
A-iv
| Parent Material Agreement(s) | A-8 | |
| Parent Meeting | A-8 | |
| Parent Permits | A-46 | |
| Parent Plan | A-49 | |
| Parent Preferred Stock | A-8 | |
| Parent Representative | A-8 | |
| Parent Reserve Report | A-8 | |
| Parent Rights | A-8 | |
| Parent Rights Agreement | A-9 | |
| Parent SEC Documents | A-42 | |
| Parent Subsidiary(ies) | A-9 | |
| Parent's Oil and Gas Interests | A-7 | |
| Parties | A-1 | |
| Party | A-9 | |
| PBGC | A-32 | |
| Permitted Encumbrances | A-9 | |
| Person | A-10 | |
| Proxy Statement/Prospectus | A-10 | |
| RCRA | A-10 | |
| Registration Statement | A-10 | |
| Required Company Stockholder Vote | A-81 | |
| Required Parent Stockholder Vote | A-81 | |
| Responsible Officers | A-10 | |
| SEC | A-10 | |
| Securities Act | A-10 | |
| Series A Certificate | A-10 | |
| Series A Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights | A-10 | |
| Series A Merger Consideration | A-14 | |
| Series A Preferred Stock | A-10 | |
| Series B Preferred | A-23 | |
| Series C Preferred | A-23 | |
| SOX | A-10 | |
| Stock Consideration | A-13 | |
| Superior Proposal | A-69 | |
| Surviving Corporation | A-12 | |
| Takeover Proposal | A-69 | |
| Target Companies | A-10 | |
| Tax Return | A-11 | |
| Taxes | A-11 | |
| TEL Distribution | A-80 | |
| TEL Distribution Record Date | A-80 | |
| TEL Units | A-80 | |
| Third-Party Consent | A-11 | |
| Under Common Control With | A-1 | |
| West Dilley Prospect | A-11 |
A-v
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This Agreement and Plan of Merger (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of January 25, 2005, by and among Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"); Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"); and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").
RECITALS
The Board of Directors of each of Parent and the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of its respective stockholders to approve the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement.
For United States federal income tax purposes, it is intended that such merger qualify as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company (the "Parties") desire to make certain representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with such merger and also to prescribe various conditions to such merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the recitals and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:
Section 1.1 Defined Terms. As used in this Agreement, each of the following terms has the
meaning set forth below:
"Affiliate" means, with respect to any Person, each other Person that directly or indirectly (through one or more intermediaries or otherwise) controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with such Person. The term "Control" (including the terms "Controlled By" and "Under Common Control With") means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the actual power to direct or cause the direction of the management policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of stock, by contract, credit arrangement or otherwise.
"Agreement" means this Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, supplemented or modified from time to time.
"Articles of Merger" means the articles of merger, prepared and executed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the NRS, filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effect the Merger in Nevada.
"Capital Expenditures" means costs and expenses associated with the acquisition, development or redevelopment of Oil and Gas Interests or any other fixed or capital assets of the Target Companies or Parent Companies, as applicable, which pursuant to GAAP are required to be capitalized and subject to depletion, depreciation or amortization, including Drilling or Completion Expenditures.
"Capital Project" means any project, transaction, agreement, arrangement or series of transactions, agreements or arrangements to which one or more of the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as the case may be, is a party involving a Capital Expenditure, including (a) any purchase, lease, acquisition, developmental drilling, completion and/or recompletion of proved developed producing, proved developed non-producing, or proved undeveloped Oil and Gas Interests; (b) any purchase, lease or acquisition and/or exploratory drilling of Oil and Gas Interests; and (c) any purchase, lease,
A-1
acquisition, construction, development or completion of transportation, compression, gathering or related facilities for oil, gas or related products or the provision of services, equipment or other property for use in developing, completing or transporting oil, gas or related products or otherwise directly related and ancillary to the oil and gas business, including the transportation, production, storage and handling of water utilized or disposed of in oil and gas production.
"CERCLA" means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, and any regulations promulgated thereunder.
"CERCLIS" means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System List.
"Closing" means the closing of the Merger and the consummation of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
"Closing Date" means the date on which the Closing occurs, which date shall be the first business day following the day by which both the Company Meeting and the Parent Meeting have been held (or such later date as is agreed upon by the Parties).
"Company Bank Credit Agreement" means the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 15, 2002, between the Company, as borrower, and Bankers Trust Company and others, as agents and lenders (as amended and supplemented).
"Company Certificate" means a certificate representing shares of Company Common Stock.
"Company Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $.002 per share, of the Company.
"Company Convertible Notes" means the Floating Rate Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 of the Company.
"Company Disclosure Schedule" means the Company Disclosure Schedule delivered in connection with this Agreement and any documents listed on such Company Disclosure Schedule or expressly incorporated therein by reference.
"Company Financial Statements" means the audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries (including the related notes) included (or incorporated by reference) in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2004, in each case as filed with the SEC.
"Company Material Agreement(s)" means (a) the Company Bank Credit Agreement, (b) any hedging agreement to which any of the Target Companies is a party or by which any of its assets is bound, (c) any agreement, contract, commitment or understanding, written or oral, (i) granting any Person registration, purchase or sale rights with respect to any security of any of the Target Companies, (ii) which materially restrains, limits or impedes any of the Target Companies, or will materially restrain, limit or impede the Surviving Corporation's, ability to compete with or conduct any business or any line of business, including geographic limitations on any of the Target Companies' or the Surviving Corporation's activities, (iii) which is a material production sharing agreement, joint venture or operating agreement, balancing agreement, farm-out or farm-in agreement, enhanced oil recovery agreement, unitization and pooling agreement or other similar contract or agreement relating to the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas, (iv) which is a material take-or-pay agreement or other similar agreement that entitles purchasers of production to receive delivery of Hydrocarbons without paying therefor, (v) which is a material seismic license or software license relating to primary geological or financial processes to which any of the Target Companies is subject, or (vi) which is a fixed price commodity sales agreement with a remaining term of more than 60 days, (d) any agreement, contract, commitment or understanding, written or oral, granting any Person a right
A-2
of indemnification and/or contribution by any of the Target Companies, (e) any voting agreement relating to any security of any of the Target Companies, and/or (f) any other written or oral agreement, contract, commitment or understanding (or amendment or modification thereof) to which any of the Target Companies is a party, by which any of the Target Companies is directly or indirectly bound, or to which any asset of any of the Target Companies may be subject, that is (i) included in Section 3.11 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, (ii) listed (in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 or in subsequent filings) as an exhibit to the Company SEC Documents or (iii) material to the Target Companies, taken as a whole, in each case as amended and supplemented.
"Company Meeting" means the meeting of the stockholders of the Company called for the purpose of voting on the Company Proposal or any adjournment thereof.
"Company Stock Option" means an option (issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time) to acquire shares of Company Common Stock granted pursuant to the Company Employee Benefit Plans.
"Company Preferred Stock" means the preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, of the Company.
"Company Proposal" means the proposal to approve this Agreement and the Merger, which proposal is to be presented to the stockholders of the Company and Parent in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
"Company Representative" means any director, officer, employee, agent, advisor (including legal, accounting and financial advisors) or other representative of any of the Target Companies.
"Company Reserve Report" means the reserve report dated October 1, 2004, referenced on page 2 of the Management Presentation prepared by the Company and provided to Parent.
"Company Senior Secured Notes" means the 9.60% Senior Secured Notes due 2012 of the Company.
"Company Subsidiary(ies)" means any corporation more than 50% of whose outstanding voting securities, or any general partnership, joint venture, or similar entity more than 50% of whose total equity interests, is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company, or any limited partnership of which the Company or any Company Subsidiary is a general partner.
"Company Warrant" means a common stock purchase warrant (issued and outstanding on the date hereof and at the Effective Time) representing the right to purchase shares or a fraction of a share of Company Common Stock.
"Confidentiality Agreement" means the letter agreement dated November 3, 2003, as amended on November 23, 2004, between the Company and Parent relating to the Company's furnishing of information to Parent and Parent's furnishing of information to the Company in connection with Parent's and the Company's evaluation of the possibility of the Merger.
"Conversion Number" means 0.415.
"Defensible Title" means such right, title and interest that is (a) evidenced by an instrument or instruments filed of record in accordance with the conveyance and recording laws of the applicable jurisdiction to the extent necessary to prevail against competing claims of bona fide purchasers for value without notice, and (b) subject to Permitted Encumbrances, free and clear of all Liens, claims, infringements, burdens and other defects.
"Derivative Transaction" means any swap transaction, option, warrant, forward purchase or sale transaction, futures transaction, cap transaction, floor transaction or collar transaction relating to one or more currencies, commodities, bonds, equity securities, loans, interest rates, catastrophe events, weather-related events, credit-related events or conditions or any indexes, or any other similar
A-3
transaction (including any option with respect to any of these transactions) or combination of any of these transactions, including collateralized mortgage obligations or other similar instruments or any debt or equity instruments evidencing or embedding any such types of transactions, and any related credit support, collateral or other similar arrangements related to such transactions.
"Disclosure Schedule" means, as applicable, the Company Disclosure Schedule or the Parent Disclosure Schedule.
"Dissenting Stockholder" means a holder of Series A Preferred Stock who has validly perfected dissenters' rights under the NRS.
"Drilling or Completion Expenditures" means any expenditure incurred, or required to be incurred by the Target Companies or Parent Companies, as applicable, with respect to exploratory drilling of Oil and Gas Interests or any developmental drilling, completion and/or recompletion of proved developed producing, proved developed non-producing, or proved undeveloped Oil and Gas Interests.
"ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
"Environmental Law" means any federal, state, local or foreign statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, policy, guideline, permit, consent, approval, license, judgment, order, writ, decree, common law (including but not limited to common law under which claims for personal injury and property damage can be pursued), injunction or other authorization (collectively, "Laws") in effect on the date hereof or at a previous time: (a) relating to emissions, discharges, releases or threatened releases of Hazardous Materials into the environment, including into air, soil, sediments, land surface or subsurface, buildings or facilities, surface water, groundwater, publicly-owned treatment works, septic systems or land; (b) relating to the generation, treatment, storage, disposal, use, handling, manufacturing, recycling, transportation or shipment of Hazardous Materials; (c) relating to occupational health and safety; (d) relating to environmental regulation of oil and gas operations; or (e) otherwise relating to the pollution of the environment, Hazardous Materials handling, treatment or disposal, reclamation or remediation activities, or protection of environmentally sensitive areas.
"Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
"Exchange Agent" means Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the transfer agent for shares of Parent Common Stock.
"GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles, as recognized by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (or any generally recognized successor).
"Governmental Action" means any authorization, application, approval, consent, exemption, filing, license, notice, registration, permit or other requirement of, to or with any Governmental Authority.
"Governmental Authority" means any national, state, provincial, county, parish, tribal or municipal government, domestic or foreign, any agency, board, bureau, commission, court, department or other instrumentality of any such government, or any arbitrator in any case that has jurisdiction over any of the Target Companies or the Parent Companies or any of their respective properties or assets.
"HSR Act" means the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended.
"Hazardous Material" means (a) any "hazardous substance," as defined by CERCLA; (b) any "hazardous waste" or "solid waste," in either case as defined by RCRA; (c) any solid, gas, liquid, chemical, material, waste or substance regulated by any Environmental Law; (d) any radioactive material, and any source, special or byproduct material as defined in 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.; (e) any asbestos-containing materials in any form or condition; (f) any polychlorinated biphenyls in any form or condition; or (g) petroleum, petroleum hydrocarbons, petroleum products or any fraction or byproducts thereof.
A-4
"Hydrocarbons" means oil, condensate, gas, casinghead gas and other liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons.
"Lien" means any lien, mortgage, deed of trust, security interest, pledge, deposit, production payment, restriction, burden, encumbrance, title defect, easement, covenant, rights of a vendor under any title retention or conditional sale agreement, or lease or other arrangement substantially equivalent thereto.
"Market Price" means the average (rounded to the second decimal place) of the per share closing sales prices of Parent Common Stock on Parent's primary National Stock Exchange (as reported by The Wall Street Journal, or if not so reported, by another authoritative source) over the 20 trading days ending on the fourth trading day preceding the Closing Date.
"Material Adverse Effect" means, when used with respect to a Party, a violation, inaccuracy, event, result or consequence that (i) has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, capitalization, results of operations or business of such Party and its wholly owned subsidiaries (as identified on its Disclosure Schedule) (taken as a whole) or the aggregate value of their assets and liabilities, except for results or consequences attributable to the effects of, or changes in, general economic or capital markets conditions, regulatory or political conditions, other effects and changes that generally affect the energy industry, such as commodity prices, or effects and changes attributable to the announcement or pendency of this Agreement (to the extent in any case that such effects and changes do not disproportionately affect such Party and its wholly owned subsidiaries (as identified on its Disclosure Schedule) taken as a whole, provided, that a decline in such Party's stock price shall not, in and of itself, constitute a Material Adverse Effect on such Party), (ii) has impaired materially or would reasonably be expected to impair materially the ability of such Party and its wholly owned subsidiaries (as identified on its Disclosure Schedule) (taken as a whole) to own, hold, develop and operate their assets or (iii) has impaired materially or would reasonably be expected to impair materially (x) the ability of such Party to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby or to perform any of its obligations hereunder or (y) Parent's ability to vote, receive dividends, or otherwise exercise ownership rights with respect to the stock of the Surviving Corporation and, indirectly, control over the assets of the Surviving Corporation.
"Merger Sub Common Stock" means the capital stock, par value $.001 per share, of Merger Sub.
"National Stock Exchange" means the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market.
"Non-U.S. Holder" means a stockholder who is not (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, or other Person taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, (iv) a trust if (x) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (y) one or more U.S. Persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or if the trust has made a valid election to be treated as a U.S. Person, or (v) a partnership, or other Person treated as a partnership for United States federal income Tax purposes, to the extent that the beneficial ownership of Company Common Stock is attributed to its partners who fall into the categories described in clauses (i)-(iv) above.
"NRS" means the Nevada Revised Statutes.
"Oil and Gas Interest(s)" means: (a) direct and indirect interests in and rights with respect to oil, gas, mineral and related properties and assets of any kind and nature, direct or indirect, including working, royalty and overriding royalty interests, production payments, operating rights, net profits interests, other non-working interests and non-operating interests; (b) interests in and rights with respect to Hydrocarbons and other minerals or revenues therefrom and contracts in connection
A-5
therewith and claims and rights thereto (including oil and gas leases, operating agreements, unitization and pooling agreements and orders, division orders, transfer orders, mineral deeds, royalty deeds, oil and gas sales, exchange and processing contracts and agreements and, in each case, interests thereunder), surface interests, fee interests, reversionary interests, reservations and concessions; (c) easements, rights of way, licenses, permits, leases, and other interests associated with, appurtenant to, or necessary for the operation of any of the foregoing; and (d) interests in equipment and machinery (including well equipment and machinery), oil and gas production, gathering, transmission, compression, treating, processing and storage facilities (including tanks, tank batteries, pipelines and gathering systems), pumps, water plants, electric plants, gasoline and gas processing plants, refineries and other tangible personal property and fixtures associated with, appurtenant to, or necessary for the operation of any of the foregoing. References in this Agreement to the "Oil and Gas Interests of the Company" or "Company's Oil and Gas Interests" mean the collective Oil and Gas Interests of the Target Companies. References in this Agreement to the "Oil and Gas Interests of Parent" or "Parent's Oil and Gas Interests" mean the collective Oil and Gas Interests of the Parent Companies.
"Ownership Interests" means, as applicable: (a) the ownership interests of the Company in its proved properties, as set forth in the Company Reserve Report and (b) the ownership interests of Parent in its proved properties, as set forth in the Parent Reserve Report.
"Parent Bank Credit Agreement" means the Credit Agreement dated October 2, 2002, as amended, between Parent and J.P. Morgan Securities, as agent.
"Parent Certificate" means a certificate representing shares of Parent Common Stock.
"Parent Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Parent.
"Parent Companies" means Parent and each of the Parent Subsidiaries.
"Parent Disclosure Schedule" means the Parent Disclosure Schedule delivered in connection with this Agreement and any documents listed on such Parent Disclosure Schedule or expressly incorporated therein by reference.
"Parent Financial Statements" means the audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements of Parent and its subsidiaries (including the related notes) included (or incorporated by reference) in Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2004, in each case as filed with the SEC.
"Parent Material Agreement(s)" means (a) the Parent Bank Credit Agreement, (b) any hedging agreement to which any of the Parent Companies is a party or by which any of its assets is bound, (c) any agreement, contract, commitment or understanding, written or oral, granting any Person registration, purchase or sale rights with respect to any security of any Parent Company, (d) any agreement, contract, commitment or understanding, written or oral, (i) granting any Person a right of indemnification and/or contribution by any Parent Company, (ii) which materially restrains, limits or impedes any of the Parent Companies' ability to compete with or conduct any business or any line of business, including geographic limitations on any of the Parent Companies' activities, (iii) which is a material production sharing agreement, joint venture or operating agreement, balancing agreement, farm-out or farm-in agreement, enhanced oil recovery agreement, unitization and pooling agreement or other similar contract or agreement relating to the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas, (iv) which is a material take-or-pay agreement or other similar agreement that entitles purchasers of production to receive delivery of Hydrocarbons without paying therefor, (v) which is a material seismic license or software license relating to primary geological or financial processes to which any of the Parent Companies is subject or (vi) which is a fixed price commodity sales agreement with a remaining term of more than 60 days, (e) any voting agreement relating to any security of any Parent Company, and/or (f) any other written or oral agreement, contract, commitment or
A-6
understanding (or amendment or modification thereof) to which any of the Parent Companies is a party, by which any of the Parent Companies is directly or indirectly bound, or to which any asset of any of the Parent Companies may be subject, that is (i) included in Section 4.11 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, (ii) listed (in Parent's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 or in subsequent filings) as an exhibit to the Parent SEC Documents, (iii) material to the Parent Companies, taken as a whole, or (iv) outside the ordinary course of business of the Parent Companies, in each case as amended or supplemented.
"Parent Meeting" means the meeting of the stockholders of Parent called for the purpose of voting on the Company Proposal, or any adjournment thereof.
"Parent Preferred Stock" means the preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, of Parent.
"Parent Representative" means any director, officer, employee, agent, advisor (including legal, accounting and financial advisors) or other representative of Parent or its subsidiaries.
"Parent Reserve Report" means the Aries report on reserves and economics dated December 1, 2004, prepared by Parent and provided to the Company.
"Parent Rights" means the preferred share purchase rights issued pursuant to the Parent Rights Agreement.
"Parent Rights Agreement" means that certain Rights Agreement dated February 23, 2002 between Parent and UMB Bank, as Rights Agent.
"Parent Subsidiary(ies)" means any corporation more than 50% of whose outstanding voting securities, or any general partnership, joint venture, or similar entity more than 50% of whose total equity interests, is owned, directly or indirectly, by Parent, or any limited partnership of which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is a general partner.
"Party" means each of the Company, Parent and Merger Sub.
"Permitted Encumbrances" means: (a) Liens for Taxes, assessments or other governmental charges or levies (i) if the same shall not at the particular time in question be due and payable or (if foreclosure, distraint, sale or other similar proceedings shall not have been commenced or, if commenced, shall have been stayed) are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and (ii) provided that any of the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as applicable, shall have set aside on its books such reserves (segregated to the extent required by sound accounting practices) as may be required by or consistent with GAAP; (b) Liens of carriers, warehousemen, mechanics, laborers, materialmen, landlords, vendors, workmen and operators arising by operation of law in the ordinary course of business or by a written agreement existing as of the date hereof and necessary or incident to the exploration, development, operation and maintenance of Hydrocarbon properties and related facilities and assets for sums not yet due and payable or are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, provided that any of the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as applicable, shall have set aside on its books such reserves (segregated to the extent required by sound accounting practices) as may be required by or consistent with GAAP; (c) Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business in connection with workers' compensation, unemployment insurance and other social security legislation (other than ERISA) which would not and will not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as applicable; (d) Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business to secure the performance of bids, tenders, trade contracts, leases, statutory obligations, surety and appeal bonds, performance and repayment bonds and other obligations of a like nature which would not and will not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as applicable; (e) Liens, easements, rights-of-way, restrictions, servitudes, permits, conditions, covenants, exceptions, reservations and other similar encumbrances incurred in the ordinary course of business or
A-7
existing on property and not materially impairing the value of the assets of any of the Target Companies or any of the Parent Companies, as applicable, or interfering with the ordinary conduct of the business of any of the Target Companies or any of the Parent Companies, as applicable, or rights to any of their assets; (f) Liens created or arising by operation of law to secure a party's obligations as a purchaser of oil and gas; (g) all rights to consent by, required notices to, filings with, or other actions by Governmental Authorities to the extent customarily obtained subsequent to closing; (h) farm-out, carried working interest, joint operating, unitization, royalty, overriding royalty, sales and similar agreements relating to the exploration or development of, or production from, Hydrocarbon properties entered into in the ordinary course of business and not in violation of Section 5.1(a), Section 5.1(b), Section 5.2(a) or Section 5.2(b), as applicable, provided the effect thereof of any of such in existence as of the date hereof on the working and net revenue interest of the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as applicable, has been properly reflected in its respective Ownership Interests; (i) any defects, irregularities or deficiencies in title to easements, rights of way or other surface use agreements that do not materially adversely affect the value of any asset of any of the Target Companies or any of the Parent Companies, as applicable; (j) Liens arising under or created pursuant to the Parent Bank Credit Agreement or the Company Bank Credit Agreement, as applicable; (k) Liens described on the applicable Disclosure Schedule; and, (l) defects in title which have not had, and would not reasonably be likely to result in, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Target Companies or the Parent Companies, as applicable.
"Person" means any natural person, corporation, company, limited or general partnership, joint stock company, joint venture, association, limited liability company, trust, bank, trust company, land trust, business trust or other entity or organization, whether or not a Governmental Authority.
"Proxy Statement/Prospectus" means a joint proxy statement in definitive form relating to the Company Meeting and the Parent Meeting, which proxy statement shall be included in the prospectus contained in the Registration Statement.
"RCRA" means the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, and any regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Registration Statement" means the Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be filed by Parent in connection with the issuance of Parent Common Stock pursuant to the Merger.
"Responsible Officers" means (a) for the Company, Gary C. Evans, Richard R. Frazier and Brad Davis, and (b) for Parent, F. H. Merelli and Paul Korus.
"SEC" means the Securities and Exchange Commission.
"Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
"Series A Certificate" means a certificate representing shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
"Series A Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights" means the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Preferred Shares by Resolution of the Board of Directors Providing for Issue of Preferred Shares Designated as Series A Preferred Stock.
"Series A Preferred Stock" means the Company's Series A Preferred Stock, $.001 par value per share, for which the Series A Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on May 21, 1993.
"SOX" means the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Target Companies" means the Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries.
A-8
"Tax Return" means any return, estimated Tax return, report, declaration, form, claim for refund or information statement relating to Taxes, including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any amendment thereof.
"Taxes" means taxes of any kind, levies or other like assessments, customs, duties, imposts, charges or fees, including income, gross receipts, ad valorem, conservation, value added, excise, real or personal property, asset, sales, use, federal royalty, license, payroll, transaction, capital, net worth and franchise taxes, estimated taxes, withholding, employment, social security, workers' compensation, utility, severance, production, unemployment compensation, occupation, premium, windfall profits, transfer and gains taxes and other governmental taxes imposed or payable to the United States or any state, local or foreign governmental subdivision or agency thereof, and in each instance such term shall include any interest, penalties or additions to tax attributable to any such tax, including penalties for the failure to file any Tax Return or report.
"Third-Party Consent" means the consent or approval of any Person other than the Target Companies, any of the Parent Companies or any Governmental Authority.
"West Dilley Prospect" means, jointly, the West Dilley Prospect and Hope Prospect referenced in the Series A Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights.
Section 1.2 References and Titles. All references in this Agreement to Exhibits, Schedules,
Articles, Sections, subsections and other subdivisions refer to the corresponding Exhibits, Schedules,
Articles, Sections, subsections and other subdivisions of or to this Agreement unless expressly provided otherwise. Titles appearing at the beginning of any Articles, Sections, subsections or other
subdivisions of this Agreement are for convenience only, do not constitute any part of this Agreement, and shall be disregarded in construing the language hereof. The words "this Agreement," "herein,"
"hereby," "hereunder" and "hereof," and words of similar import, refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular subdivision unless expressly so limited. The words "this Article," "this
Section" and "this subsection," and words of similar import, refer only to the Article, Section or subsection hereof in which such words occur. The word "or" is not exclusive, and the word "including"
(in its various forms) means including without limitation. Pronouns in masculine, feminine or neuter genders shall be construed to state and include any other gender, and words, terms and titles
(including terms defined herein) in the singular form shall be construed to include the plural and vice versa, unless the context otherwise requires. As used in the representations and warranties
contained in this Agreement, the phrase "to the knowledge" of the representing Party shall mean that Responsible Officers of such Party, individually or collectively, either (a) know that the
matter being represented and warranted is true and accurate or (b) have no reason, after reasonable inquiry (including, without limitation, review of their files and inquiry of pertinent
management personnel), to believe that the matter being represented and warranted is not true and accurate.
Section 2.1 The Merger. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, at the
Effective Time, Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the Company in accordance with
the provisions of this Agreement. Such merger is referred to herein as the "Merger."
Section 2.2 Effect of the Merger. Upon the effectiveness of the Merger, the separate existence
of Merger Sub shall cease and the Company, as the surviving corporation in the Merger (the
"Surviving Corporation"), shall continue its corporate existence under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Merger shall have the effects specified in
this Agreement and the NRS.
A-9
Section 2.3 Governing Instruments, Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation.
(a) The articles of incorporation of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the articles of incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until duly amended in accordance with their terms and applicable law.
(b) The bylaws of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until duly amended in accordance with their terms and applicable law.
(c) The directors and officers of Merger Sub at the Effective Time shall be the directors and officers, respectively, of the Surviving Corporation from the Effective Time until their respective successors have been duly elected or appointed in accordance with the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation and applicable law.
Section 2.4 Effect on Securities.
(a) Merger Sub Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of any holder thereof, each share of Merger Sub Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into one share of capital stock of the Surviving Corporation and each certificate evidencing ownership of any such shares shall continue to evidence ownership of the same number of shares of the capital stock of the Surviving Corporation.
(b) Parent Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, each share of Parent capital stock then issued and outstanding shall remain issued, outstanding and unchanged.
(c) Company Securities.
(i) Company Common Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of any holder thereof, each share of Company Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into the right to receive shares of validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable Parent Common Stock, with each such share of Company Common Stock being converted into that number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the Conversion Number (the "Merger Consideration"). Each share of Company Common Stock, when so converted, shall automatically be cancelled and retired, shall cease to exist and shall no longer be outstanding; and the holder of any certificate representing any such shares shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive the Merger Consideration (along with any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock as provided in Section 2.5(e) and any unpaid dividends and distributions with respect to such shares of Parent Common Stock as provided in Section 2.5(c)), without interest, upon the surrender of such certificate in accordance with Section 2.5.
(ii) Company Treasury Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger, all shares of Company Common Stock that are issued and held directly by the Company as treasury stock shall be cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no shares of Parent Common Stock or other consideration shall be paid or payable in exchange therefor.
(iii) Company Stock Options. Promptly after the date hereof, the Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to solicit the consent of the holders ("Option Consents") of the outstanding Company Stock Options which require holder consent to cancel such Company Stock Options (whether or not then exercisable) and the Company shall take such action as may be necessary with respect to outstanding Company Stock Options which do not require holder consent to cancel such Company Stock Options
A-10
(whether or not then exercisable), to cancel the Company Stock Options effective as of the Effective Time in exchange for a single lump sum cash payment from the Company or, at Parent's option, Parent equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to each such Company Stock Option (whether or not then exercisable) immediately prior to the Effective Time and (ii) the excess, if any, of the closing price of Company Common Stock on the day prior to the Closing Date over the exercise price per share under each such Company Stock Option (less the amount of any withholding taxes that may be required with respect thereto). The Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any required Option Consents prior to the Closing Date, but notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the failure to obtain any or all of such Option Consents shall not result in a failure of a condition to Closing. In the event that any required Option Consent with respect to a Company Stock Option is not obtained prior to the Closing Date, then each such outstanding Company Stock Option, whether vested or unvested, shall be assumed by Parent and shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions of the Company Stock Option agreement and the 2001 Stock Option Plan (as described in Section 3.16 of the Company Disclosure Schedule), together with amendments thereto, by which it is evidenced as of the Effective Time, except that from and after the Effective Time, each such Company Stock Option shall be converted into an option to purchase Parent Common Stock in a manner that meets the requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.424-1.
(iv) Company Warrants. All Company Warrants shall remain outstanding (if outstanding in accordance with their currently existing terms) following the Effective Time. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the Company or any holder thereof, each Company Warrant shall be assumed by Parent and shall be exercisable for Parent Common Stock based on the Conversion Number but otherwise on substantially the same terms and conditions as apply immediately prior to the Effective Time.
(v) 1996 Preferred. Prior to the Effective Time and pursuant to Section 5.26, the Company shall cause each of the Company Subsidiaries that is Controlled By the Company and who owns shares of the 1996 Preferred to convert all of the issued and outstanding shares of the 1996 Preferred into shares of Company Common Stock, pursuant to the terms set forth in the certificate of designations for the 1996 Preferred.
(vi) Series A Preferred Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of any holder thereof, each share of Series A Preferred Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into the right to receive shares of validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable Parent Common Stock, with each such share of Series A Preferred Stock being converted into that number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing 20 by the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (the "Series A Merger Consideration"). Each share of Series A Preferred Stock, when so converted, shall automatically be cancelled and retired, shall cease to exist and shall no longer be outstanding; and the holder of any Series A Certificate shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive the Series A Merger Consideration, which shall be issued in the form of whole shares of Parent Common Stock to the extent possible and otherwise in fractional shares of Parent Common Stock (along with any unpaid dividends and distributions with respect to such whole or fractional shares of Parent Common Stock as provided in Section 2.5(c)), without interest, upon the surrender of such certificate in accordance with Section 2.5.
A-11
Any fractional shares of Parent Common Stock issued pursuant to this Section 2.4(c)(vi) shall entitle the owner thereof to vote in the same manner as the holder of a whole share of Parent Common Stock but proportionately to the fractional interest. Parent shall (until the date referenced in the last sentence of Section 2.5(g)), if it so elects in its sole discretion, offer holders of such fractional shares of Parent Common Stock one or both of the following options: (1) the right to purchase an additional fraction of a share of Parent Common Stock (at the closing sales price of the Parent Common Stock on Parent's primary National Stock Exchange on the day immediately prior to holder's acceptance of such option) sufficient to provide the holder with a whole share and/or (2) the establishment of an agency arrangement which, on or prior to the date referenced in the last sentence of Section 2.5(g), combines fractional shares of participating holders of Parent Common Stock into whole shares, sells such shares for the account of the participating holders (to a party other than Parent, a Parent Subsidiary or an Affiliate of Parent) and then distributes the resulting sales proceeds to the participating holders in proportion to their contributed fractional share interests (with related transaction costs to be borne by Parent); provided, that the provisions of this sentence shall not preclude Parent from offering other alternatives to holders of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock and that, in no event, shall Parent effectively force holders of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to receive cash in respect of such fractional shares.
(vii) Other Interests. Except as provided in Section 2.4(c) or as otherwise agreed to by the Parties, the provisions of any other plan, program or arrangement providing for the issuance or grant of any other interest in respect of the capital stock of the Target Companies shall become null and void without any payment of cash, or agreement therefor.
(viii) Shares of Dissenting Stockholders. Any issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by a Dissenting Stockholder shall be converted into the right to receive such consideration as may be determined to be due to such Dissenting Stockholder pursuant to the provisions of the NRS, which consideration, in any case, shall be paid by the Company or the Surviving Corporation (as opposed to the Parent); provided, however, shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding at the Effective Time and held by a Dissenting Stockholder who shall, after the Effective Time, withdraw his demand for appraisal or lose his right of appraisal as provided in the NRS, shall be deemed to be converted, as of the Effective Time, into the right to receive the Series A Merger Consideration (without interest) in accordance with Section 2.4(c)(vi) and Section 2.5. The Company shall give Parent (A) prompt notice of any written assertions of dissenters' rights, withdrawals of such assertions and any other instruments served pursuant to the NRS received by the Company, and (B) the opportunity to direct all negotiations and proceedings with respect to assertions of dissenters' rights under the NRS. The Company shall not voluntarily make any payment with respect to any assertions of dissenters' rights and shall not, except with the prior written consent of Parent, settle or offer to settle any such demands.
Section 2.5 Exchange of Certificates.
(a) Exchange Fund. Immediately after the Effective Time, Parent shall deposit with the Exchange Agent, for the benefit of (i) the holders of shares of Company Common Stock and for exchange in accordance with this Agreement, certificates representing the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued as Merger Consideration, and funds necessary to pay the cash amount for any fractional shares as specified in Section 2.5(e), in exchange for shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(i), and (ii) the holders of shares of
A-12
Series A Preferred Stock and for exchange in accordance with this Agreement, certificates representing the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued as Series A Merger Consideration, in exchange for shares of Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(vi). Such shares of Parent Common Stock, together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto (as provided in Section 2.5(c)) and such funds, are referred to herein as the "Exchange Fund." The Exchange Agent, pursuant to irrevocable instructions consistent with the terms of this Agreement, shall deliver the Parent Common Stock to be issued or paid pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(i) (and the cash amount for any fractional shares as specified in Section 2.5(e) and any unpaid dividends and distributions pursuant to Section 2.5(c)) and Section 2.4(c)(vi) out of the Exchange Fund, and the Exchange Fund shall not be used for any other purpose whatsoever. The Exchange Agent shall not be entitled to vote or exercise any rights of ownership with respect to the Parent Common Stock held by it from time to time hereunder, except that it shall receive and hold all dividends or other distributions paid or distributed with respect thereto for the account of Persons entitled thereto.
(b) Exchange Procedures.
(i) Common Stock.
(1) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record of a Company Certificate that, immediately prior to the Effective Time, represented shares of Company Common Stock, which was converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(i), a letter of transmittal to be used to effect the exchange of such Company Certificate for a Parent Certificate (and cash in lieu of fractional shares), along with instructions for using such letter of transmittal to effect such exchange. The letter of transmittal (or the instructions thereto) shall specify that delivery of any Company Certificate shall be effected, and risk of loss and title thereto shall pass, only upon delivery of such Company Certificate to the Exchange Agent and shall be in such form and have such other provisions as Parent may reasonably specify.
(2) Upon surrender to the Exchange Agent of a Company Certificate for cancellation, together with a duly completed and executed letter of transmittal and any other required documents (including, in the case of any Person constituting an "affiliate" of the Company for purposes of Rule 145(c) and (d) under the Securities Act, a written agreement from such Person as described in Section 5.10, if not theretofore delivered to Parent): (A) the holder of such Company Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor a Parent Certificate representing the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(i), any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock as provided in Section 2.5(e), and any unpaid dividends and distributions that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.5(c) (after giving effect to any required withholding of taxes); and (B) the Company Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be cancelled. No interest shall be paid or accrued on the Merger Consideration, cash in lieu of fractional shares, or unpaid dividends and distributions, if any, payable to holders of Company Certificates.
(3) In the event of a transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock that is not registered in the transfer records of the Company, a Parent Certificate representing the appropriate number of shares of Parent Common Stock (along with any cash in lieu of fractional shares and any unpaid dividends and distributions that such holder has the right to receive) may be issued or paid to a transferee if the Company Certificate representing such shares of Company Common Stock is presented to the Exchange Agent
A-13
accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect such transfer, including such signature guarantees as Parent or the Exchange Agent may request, and to evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid.
(4) Until surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.5(b)(i), each Company Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender a Parent Certificate representing shares of Parent Common Stock as provided in Section 2.4(c)(i) (along with any cash in lieu of fractional shares and any unpaid dividends and distributions).
(ii) Series A Preferred Stock.
(1) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail, to the extent such holder's mailing address is known, to each holder of record of a Series A Certificate that, immediately prior to the Effective Time, represented shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which was converted into the right to receive the Series A Merger Consideration pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(vi), a letter of transmittal to be used to effect the exchange of such Series A Certificate for a Parent Certificate, along with instructions for using such letter of transmittal to effect such exchange. The letter of transmittal (or the instructions thereto) shall specify that delivery of any Series A Certificate shall be effected, and risk of loss and title thereto shall pass, only upon delivery of such Series A Certificate to the Exchange Agent and shall be in such form and have such other provisions as Parent may reasonably specify.
(2) Upon surrender to the Exchange Agent of a Series A Certificate for cancellation, together with a duly completed and executed letter of transmittal and any other required documents (including, in the case of any Person constituting an "affiliate" of the Company for purposes of Rule 145(c) and (d) under the Securities Act, a written agreement from such Person as described in Section 5.10, if not theretofore delivered to Parent): (A) the holder of such Series A Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor a Parent Certificate representing the number of shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.4(c)(vi) and any unpaid dividends and distributions that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.5(c) (after giving effect to any required withholding of taxes); and (B) the Series A Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be cancelled. No interest shall be paid or accrued on the Series A Merger Consideration or unpaid dividends and distributions, if any, payable to holders of Series A Certificates.
(3) In the event of a transfer of ownership of Series A Preferred Stock that is not registered in the transfer records of the Company, a Parent Certificate representing the appropriate number of shares of Parent Common Stock (along with any unpaid dividends and distributions that such holder has the right to receive) may be issued or paid to a transferee if the Series A Certificate representing such shares of Series A Preferred Stock is presented to the Exchange Agent accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect such transfer, including such signature guarantees as Parent or the Exchange Agent may request, and to evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid.
(4) Until surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.5(b)(ii), each Series A Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender a Parent Certificate representing shares of Parent Common Stock as provided in Section 2.4(c)(vi) (along with any unpaid dividends and distributions).
A-14
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares.
(i) Common Stock. No dividends or other distributions with respect to Parent Common Stock declared or made after the Effective Time with a record date after the Effective Time shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Company Certificate. Subject to the effect of applicable laws: (A) at the time of the surrender of a Company Certificate for exchange in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.5, there shall be paid to the surrendering holder, without interest, the amount of dividends or other distributions (having a record date after the Effective Time but on or prior to surrender and a payment date on or prior to surrender) theretofore paid with respect to the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder is entitled to receive (less the amount of any withholding taxes that may be required with respect thereto); and (B) at the appropriate payment date, and, without duplicating any payment made under clause (A) above, there shall be paid to the surrendering holder, without interest, the amount of dividends or other distributions (having a record date after the Effective Time but on or prior to surrender and a payment date subsequent to surrender) payable with respect to the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder receives (less the amount of any withholding taxes that may be required with respect thereto).
(ii) Series A Preferred Stock. No dividends or other distributions with respect to Parent Common Stock declared or made after the Effective Time with a record date after the Effective Time shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Series A Certificate. Subject to the effect of applicable laws: (A) at the time of the surrender of a Series A Certificate for exchange in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.5, there shall be paid to the surrendering holder, without interest, the amount of dividends or other distributions (having a record date after the Effective Time but on or prior to surrender and a payment date on or prior to surrender) theretofore paid with respect to the number of shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder is entitled to receive (less the amount of any withholding taxes that may be required with respect thereto); and (B) at the appropriate payment date, and, without duplicating any payment made under clause (A) above, there shall be paid to the surrendering holder, without interest, the amount of dividends or other distributions (having a record date after the Effective Time but on or prior to surrender and a payment date subsequent to surrender) payable with respect to the number of shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder receives (less the amount of any withholding taxes that may be required with respect thereto).
(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock. All shares of Parent Common Stock issued as the Merger Consideration upon the surrender for exchange of shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with the terms hereof (together with any cash paid pursuant to Section 2.5(e)) shall be deemed to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such shares of Company Common Stock. All shares of Parent Common Stock issued as the Series A Merger Consideration upon the surrender for exchange of shares of Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms hereof shall be deemed to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such shares of Series A Preferred Stock. After the Effective Time, there shall be no further registration of transfers on the Surviving Corporation's stock transfer books of the shares of Company Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, a Company Certificate or Series A Certificate is presented to the Surviving Corporation for any reason, it shall be cancelled and exchanged as provided in this Section 2.5.
(e) Treatment of Fractional Shares. Fractional shares, if any, of Parent Common Stock shall be issued in the Merger to a holder of Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with
A-15
Section 2.4(c)(vi), no Parent Certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of Parent Common Stock shall be issued in the Merger to a holder of Company Common Stock and, except as provided in this Section 2.5(e), Section 2.4(c)(vi) or Section 2.5(c)(ii) no dividend or other distribution, stock split or interest shall relate to any such fractional share, and except as provided in Section 2.4(c)(vi) such fractional share shall not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any other rights of a stockholder of Parent. In lieu of any fractional share of Parent Common Stock to which a holder of Company Common Stock would otherwise be entitled, such holder, upon surrender of a Company Certificate as described in this Section 2.5, shall be paid an amount in cash (without interest) determined by multiplying (i) the Market Price by (ii) the fraction of a share of Parent Common Stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled, in which case Parent shall make available to the Exchange Agent, as part of the Exchange Fund, the amount of cash necessary to make such payments. The Parties acknowledge that such payment of cash consideration in lieu of issuing fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to a holder of Company Common Stock was not separately bargained for consideration, but merely represents a mechanical rounding off for purposes of simplifying the corporate and accounting problems that would otherwise be caused by the issuance of such fractional shares of Parent Common Stock.
(f) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund held by the Exchange Agent in accordance with the terms of this Section 2.5 that remains unclaimed by the former stockholders of the Company for a period of six months following the Effective Time shall be delivered to Parent, upon demand. Thereafter, any former stockholders of the Company who have not theretofore complied with the provisions of this Section 2.5 shall look only to Parent for payment of their claim for Parent Common Stock, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock (with respect to former holders of Company Common Stock) and any dividends or distributions with respect to Parent Common Stock (all without interest).
(g) No Liability. Neither Parent, the Company, the Surviving Corporation, the Exchange Agent nor any other Person shall be liable to any former holder of shares of Company Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock for any amount properly delivered to any public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law. Any amounts remaining unclaimed by former holders of Company Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock for a period of three years following the Effective Time (or such earlier date immediately prior to the time at which such amounts would otherwise escheat to or become property of any governmental entity) shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, become the property of Parent, free and clear of any claims or interest of any such holders or their successors, assigns or personal representatives previously entitled thereto.
(h) Lost, Stolen, or Destroyed Certificates. If any Company Certificate or Series A Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such Company Certificate or Series A Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed, and, if required by Parent or the Exchange Agent, the posting by such Person of a bond, in such reasonable amount as Parent or the Exchange Agent may direct, as indemnity against any claims that may be made against it with respect to such Company Certificate or Series A Certificate, the Exchange Agent shall (i) issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Company Certificate the shares of Parent Common Stock (along with any cash in lieu of fractional shares pursuant to Section 2.5(e) and any unpaid dividends and distributions pursuant to Section 2.5(c)) deliverable with respect thereto pursuant to this Agreement and (ii) issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Series A Certificate the shares of Parent Common Stock (along with any unpaid dividends and distributions pursuant to Section 2.5(c)) deliverable with respect thereto pursuant to this Agreement.
A-16
Section 2.6 Associated Rights. References in this Agreement to Company Common Stock shall
include, unless the context requires otherwise, the associated rights (the
"Company Rights") issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement dated as of January 6, 1998 between the Company and Securities Transfer Corporation
(the "Company Rights Agreement").
Section 2.7 Withholding. Each of Parent, the Surviving Corporation, and the Exchange Agent shall
be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to
this Agreement to any holder of Company Common Stock (including Company Common Stock held as a result of the conversion of the 1996 Preferred prior to the Effective Time pursuant to
Section 5.26) and any holder of Series A Preferred Stock such amounts as Parent, the Surviving Corporation, or the Exchange Agent are required to deduct and withhold under the Code or
any provision of state, local, or foreign Tax law, with respect to the making of such payment. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by Parent, the Surviving Corporation, or the Exchange Agent,
such withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of Company Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock, as the case may be, in respect
of whom such deduction and withholding was made by Parent, the Surviving Corporation, or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be.
Section 2.8 Closing. The Closing shall take place on the Closing Date at such time and place as
is agreed upon by Parent and the Company.
Section 2.9 Effective Time of the Merger. The Merger shall become effective immediately when the
Articles of Merger and any other filings or recordings required under the NRS are accepted for filing by
the Secretary of State of Nevada, or at such time thereafter as is provided in the Articles of Merger (the "Effective Time"). As soon as practicable
after the Closing, the Articles of Merger shall be filed, and the Effective Time shall occur, on the Closing Date; provided, however, that the Articles of Merger may be filed prior to the Closing Date
or prior to the Closing so long as they provide for an effective time that occurs on the Closing Date immediately after the Closing.
Section 2.10 Taking of Necessary Action; Further Action. Subject to the other terms and
conditions of this Agreement, each of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company shall use all reasonable efforts to take all such actions
as may be necessary or appropriate in order to effectuate the Merger under the NRS as promptly as commercially practicable. If, at any time after the Effective Time, any further action is necessary or
desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement and to vest the Surviving Corporation with full right, title and possession to all assets, real estate and other property, rights, privileges,
powers and franchises of either of Merger Sub or the Company, the officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation are fully authorized, in the name of the Surviving Corporation or otherwise to
take, and shall take, all such lawful and necessary action.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company hereby represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub as follows, except as set forth, specifically with reference to a particular section below, on the Company Disclosure Schedule:
Section 3.1 Organization. Each of the Target Companies: (a) is a corporation or other
entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its state of
incorporation or formation; (b) has the requisite power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and to conduct its business as it is presently being conducted; and (c) is
duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation or limited partnership, as applicable, and is in good standing, in each jurisdiction where the character of the properties owned or leased by it
or the nature of its activities makes such qualification necessary (except where any failure to be so qualified or to be in good standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company). Accurate and
A-17
complete copies of the certificate of incorporation, bylaws, minute books and/or other organizational documents of each of the Target Companies have heretofore been delivered to Parent. The Company has no corporate or other subsidiaries other than the Company Subsidiaries.
Section 3.2 Other Equity Interests. None of the Target Companies owns any equity interest in any
general or limited partnership, corporation, limited liability company or joint venture other than
the Company Subsidiaries or as listed on the Company Disclosure Schedule (other than joint operating and other ownership arrangements and tax partnerships entered into in the ordinary course of
business that, individually or in the aggregate, are not material to the operations or business of the Target Companies, taken as a whole, and that do not entail any material liabilities).
Section 3.3 Authority and Enforceability. The Company has the requisite corporate power and
authority to enter into and deliver this Agreement and (with respect to consummation of the Merger, subject to
the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of the Company) to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and (with respect to
consummation of the Merger, subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of the Company) the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and
validly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of the Company, including approval by the Board of Directors of the Company, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the
Company are necessary to authorize the execution or delivery of this Agreement or (with respect to consummation of the Merger, subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders
of the Company) to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and (with respect to consummation of the Merger,
subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of the Company and assuming that this Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of Parent and Merger Sub)
constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms.
Section 3.4 No Violations. The execution and delivery of this Agreement do not, and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and compliance by the Company with the
provisions hereof will not, conflict with, result in any violation of or default (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) under, give rise to a right of termination, cancellation or
acceleration of any obligation or to the loss of a material benefit under, or result in the creation of any Lien on any of the properties or assets of any of the Target Companies under, any provision
of (a) the certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or any other organizational documents of any of the Target Companies, (b) any loan or credit agreement, note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, lease, permit, concession, franchise, license or other agreement or instrument applicable to the Target Companies, or (c) assuming the consents, approvals, authorizations, permits,
filings and notifications referred to in Section 3.5 are duly and timely obtained or made, any judgment, order, decree, statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation applicable to the Target
Companies or any of their respective properties or assets, other than (y) in the case of clause (b) above, any such conflict, violation, default, right, loss or Lien that may arise under
the Company Bank Credit Agreement, and (z) in the case of clause (b) or (c) above, any such conflict, violation, default, right, loss or Lien that, individually or in the
aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
Section 3.5 Consents and Approvals. No consent, approval, order or authorization of,
registration, declaration or filing with, or permit from, any Governmental Authority is required by or with
respect to any of the Target Companies in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company or the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby, except
for the following: (a) any such consent, approval, order, authorization, registration, declaration, filing or permit which the failure to obtain or make would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; (b) the filing of the Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State of Nevada pursuant to applicable provisions of the NRS;
(c) the filing of a
A-18
pre-merger notification report by the Company as may be required under the HSR Act and the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period; (d) the filing with the SEC of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and such reports under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and such other compliance with the Exchange Act and the Securities Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder as may be required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and the obtaining from the SEC of such orders as may be so required; (e) such filings and approvals as may be required by any applicable state securities, "blue sky" or takeover laws or Environmental Laws; and (f) such filings and approvals as may be required by any foreign pre-merger notification, securities, corporate or other law, rule or regulation. No Third-Party Consent is required by or with respect to any of the Target Companies in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, except for (x) any such Third-Party Consent which the failure to obtain would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, (y) the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of the Company, and (z) any consent, approval or waiver required by the terms of the Company Bank Credit Agreement.
Section 3.6 SEC Documents. The Company (i) has made available to Parent a true and complete
copy of each report, schedule, registration statement and definitive proxy statement filed
by the Company with the SEC since January 1, 2001, and prior to the date of this Agreement (and any amendments thereto), including exhibits and other information incorporated therein (the
"Company SEC Documents"), which are all the documents (other than preliminary material) that the Company was required to file with the SEC since such
date, and (ii) has delivered to Parent a true and complete copy of all correspondence between the SEC and any of the Target Companies since January 1, 2003. Each of the Company SEC
Documents was timely filed with the SEC. As of their respective dates, each of the Company SEC Documents, as amended (including the financial statements and schedules provided therein or incorporated
by reference therein) (i) complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and SOX, as the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
thereunder applicable to such Company SEC Documents, and (ii) did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary
to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Section 3.7 Financial Statements. The Company Financial Statements were prepared in accordance
with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be indicated in
the notes thereto or, in the case of unaudited statements, as permitted by Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the SEC) and fairly present (in the case of the
unaudited statements, subject to normal, recurring adjustments) the consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as of their respective dates and the consolidated results of
operations and the consolidated cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries for the periods presented therein. The books and records of the Target Companies have been, and are being, maintained in
accordance with GAAP and any other applicable legal and accounting requirements and reflect only actual transactions. Deloitte & Touche LLC is an independent public accounting firm with respect
to the Target Companies and has not resigned or been dismissed by the Target Companies from such capacity.
Section 3.8 Capital Structure.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 200,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Company Preferred Stock, 216,000 shares of which have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 925,000 shares of which have been designated as Series B Preferred Stock (the "Series B Preferred"), 625,000 shares of which have been designated as Series C Preferred Stock (the "Series C Preferred"), 1,000,000 shares of which have been designated as 1996 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "1996 Preferred"), 500,000 shares of which have been designated as 1998 Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (the "1998 Preferred") and 50,000 shares of which have been designated as 1999 Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (the "1999 Preferred").
A-19
(b) As of the close of business on January 24, 2005, there were (i) 91,469,696 issued and outstanding shares of Company Common Stock (including 2,163,992 shares of Company Common Stock held by the KSOP (as herein defined) and including 3,926,034 shares of Company Common Stock held directly or indirectly by the Company as treasury stock), (ii) 80,000 issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, (iii) no shares of the Series B Preferred issued or outstanding, (iv) no shares of the Series C Preferred issued or outstanding, (v) 1,000,000 shares of the 1996 Preferred issued and outstanding, (vi) no shares of the 1998 Preferred issued or outstanding, (vii) no shares of the 1999 Preferred issued or outstanding, (viii) Company Stock Options that were issued and outstanding relating to 5,673,002 shares of Company Common Stock, (ix) reserved for issuance up to 10,255,000 shares of Company Common Stock upon conversion of the Company Convertible Notes (assuming the Company Convertible Notes were to be converted as of January 24, 2005 and the Ten Day Average Closing Stock Price (as defined in the indenture relating to the Company Convertible Notes) were calculated for the period ended January 24, 2005, the number of shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Company Convertible Notes would be 353,366), and (x) Company Warrants relating to 7,228,457 shares of Company Common Stock that were issued and outstanding. As of the close of business on January 24, 2005 and as of the date hereof, 3,926,034 shares of Company Common Stock were issued and held directly or indirectly by the Company as treasury stock and no shares of Company Preferred Stock were issued and held directly by the Company as treasury stock. As of the close of business on January 24, 2005 and as of the date hereof, shares of Company Common Stock were issued and held by a Company Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company and 1,000,000 shares of the 1996 Preferred were issued and held by Company Subsidiaries that are Controlled By the Company, which represents all the issued and outstanding shares of the 1996 Preferred.
(c) Except as set forth in Section 3.8(b), there are outstanding (i) no shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Company, (ii) no securities of the Company or any other Person convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Company, (iii) no stock appreciation rights or phantom stock rights to which any of the Target Companies are obligated and (iv) no subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights (including preemptive rights), commitments, understandings or agreements to which the Company is a party or by which it is bound obligating the Company to issue, deliver, sell, purchase, redeem or acquire shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Company (or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Company) or obligating the Company to grant, extend or enter into any such subscription, option, warrant, call, right, commitment, understanding or agreement.
(d) All outstanding shares of Company capital stock are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to any preemptive right. There are no shares of Company capital stock reserved for issuance.
(e) All outstanding shares of capital stock and other voting securities of each of the corporate Company Subsidiaries are (i) validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to any preemptive right, and (ii) owned by the Target Companies, free and clear of all Liens, claims and options of any nature (except for Permitted Encumbrances). There are outstanding (y) no securities of any Company Subsidiary or any other Person convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock, other voting securities or other equity interests of such Company Subsidiary, and (z) no subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights (including preemptive rights), commitments, understandings or agreements to which any Company Subsidiary is a party or by which it is bound obligating such Company Subsidiary to issue, deliver, sell, purchase, redeem or acquire shares of capital stock, other voting securities or other equity interests of such Company Subsidiary (or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock, other voting securities or other equity interests of such Company Subsidiary) or
A-20
obligating any Company Subsidiary to grant, extend or enter into any such subscription, option, warrant, call, right, commitment, understanding or agreement.
(f) There is no stockholder agreement, voting trust or other agreement or understanding to which the Company is a party or by which it is bound relating to the voting of any shares of the capital stock of any of the Target Companies. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of the Target Companies having the right to vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable for, securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which the stockholders of any of the Target Companies may vote.
(g) None of the Target Companies is obligated to redeem or otherwise repurchase any of its capital stock.
(h) The Company is in compliance with the applicable listing rules of the New York Stock Exchange and has not, since January 1, 2003, received any notice from the New York Stock Exchange asserting any non-compliance with such rules.
(i) Following the Effective Time, there shall be no securities of any of the Surviving Corporation, the Target Companies or any other Person convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Surviving Corporation or any of the Target Companies.
(j) The Board of Directors has made an irrevocable determination that an event similar to the commencement of a tender or exchange offer which would, if successful, result in a Change of Control (as defined in the Company's stock option agreements) has occurred and would, if consummated, materially alter the structure or business of the Company.
(k) The exercise price for the Company Warrants is $15.00 per share of Company Common Stock. The conversion price of the Company Convertible Notes is, as of the date of this Agreement, $12.19 per share of Company Common Stock which price will be adjusted immediately following the TEL Distribution pursuant to the terms of the indenture relating to the Company Convertible Notes. For example, based on an average closing price for Company Common Stock for the 20-trading day period ended January 18, 2005 of $12.427, and the closing price of the TEL Units on January 18, 2005 of $10.395, the revised conversion price would be $12.032.
(l) There have never been any liquidation proceeds of any kind regarding the West Dilley Prospect. There are no accrued or unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock.
Section 3.9 No Undisclosed Liabilities. There are no material liabilities of any of the Target
Companies of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or
otherwise, other than (a) liabilities adequately provided for in the Company Financial Statements, (b) liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business subsequent to
September 30, 2004, (c) liabilities under this Agreement, and (d) liabilities set forth on Section 3.9 of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
Section 3.10 Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Except as specifically contemplated by this
Agreement, since September 30, 2004, none of the Target Companies has done any of the following:
(a) Discharged or satisfied any Lien or paid any obligation or liability, absolute or contingent, other than current liabilities incurred and paid in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
(b) Paid or declared any dividends or distributions (other than in relation to the TEL Distribution), purchased, redeemed, acquired or retired any indebtedness, stock or other securities from its stockholders or other securityholders (except as relates to the conversion of the 1996 Preferred in accordance with Section 5.26), made any loans or advances or guaranteed any loans
A-21
or advances to any Person (other than loans, advances or guaranties made in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices), or otherwise incurred or suffered to exist any liabilities (other than current liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(c) Except for Permitted Encumbrances, suffered or permitted any Lien to arise or be granted or created against or upon any of its assets;
(d) Canceled, waived or released any rights or claims against, or indebtedness owed by, third parties (including, without limitation, any standstill agreements);
(e) Amended its articles of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational documents;
(f) Made or permitted any amendment, supplement, modification or termination of, or any acceleration under, any Company Material Agreement;
(g) Sold, leased, transferred, assigned or otherwise disposed of (i) any Oil and Gas Interests of the Company that, individually or in the aggregate, had a value of $1,000,000 or more, or (ii) any other assets that, individually or in the aggregate, had a value at the time of such lease, transfer, assignment or disposition of $1,000,000 or more (and, in each case where a sale, lease, transfer, assignment or other disposition was made, it was made for fair consideration in the ordinary course of business); provided, however, that this Section 3.10(g) shall not apply to the sale of Hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business;
(h) Made any investment in or contribution, payment, advance or loan to any Person (other than investments, contributions, payments or advances, or commitments with respect thereto, less than $1,000,000 in the aggregate, made in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(i) Paid, loaned or advanced (other than the payment, advance or reimbursement of expenses in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices) any amounts to, or sold, transferred or leased any of its assets to, or entered into any other transaction with, any of its Affiliates other than the Target Companies;
(j) Made any material change in any of the accounting principles followed by it or the method of applying such principles;
(k) Entered into any material transaction (other than this Agreement) except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
(l) Increased benefits or benefit plan costs or changed bonus, insurance, pension, compensation or other benefit plan or arrangement or granted any bonus or increase in wages, salary or other compensation or made any other change in employment terms to (or entered into severance or retention arrangements of any type with) any officer, director or employee of any of the Target Companies (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(m) Issued any note, bond or other debt security or created, incurred, assumed, or guaranteed any indebtedness for borrowed money or capitalized lease obligation involving more than $1,000,000 in the aggregate (other than pursuant to the Company Bank Credit Agreement);
(n) Delayed, postponed or accelerated the payment of accounts payable or other liabilities (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(o) Canceled, compromised, waived or released any right or claim (or series of related rights and claims) involving more than $1,000,000 in the aggregate (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
A-22
(p) Except as relates to the conversion of the 1996 Preferred in accordance with Section 5.26, issued, sold, or otherwise disposed of any of its capital stock or other equity interest or granted any option, warrant, or other right to purchase or obtain (including upon conversion, exchange, or exercise) any of its capital stock or other equity interest (or reduced the exercise or conversion price or extended the time for exercise or conversion, other than in accordance with mandatory contractual provisions, of any rights, options or warrants to acquire its capital stock or securities);
(q) Made any loan to, or entered into any other transaction with, any of its directors, officers or employees (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices and not involving more than $100,000 in the aggregate);
(r) Made or pledged to make any charitable or other capital contribution outside the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
(s) Made or committed to make capital expenditures in excess of $195,000,000 in the aggregate;
(t) Made or changed any material Tax election or settled or compromised any material income Tax liability;
(u) Entered into, modified or amended any Derivative Transaction;
(v) Otherwise been involved in any other material occurrence, event, incident, action, failure to act, or transaction involving any of the Target Companies (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(w) Entered into any transaction with an Affiliate (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(x) Agreed, whether in writing or otherwise, to do any of the foregoing; or
(y) Suffered any Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.11 Compliance with Laws, Material Agreements and Permits. None of the Target Companies
is in violation of, or in default under, and no event has occurred that (with notice or the lapse of time or both) would constitute a
violation of or default under: (a) its certificate of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational documents, (b) any applicable law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, writ, decree or
judgment of any Governmental Authority, or (c) any Company Material Agreement, except (in the case of clause (b) or (c) above) for any violation or default that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Each of the Target Companies has obtained and holds all permits, licenses, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises,
approvals and authorizations of all Governmental Authorities necessary for the lawful conduct of its business and the lawful ownership, use and operation of its assets
("Company Permits"), except for Company Permits which the failure to obtain or hold would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company. None of the Company Permits shall be adversely affected by the consummation of the transactions contemplated under this Agreement or requires any filing or consent in connection
therewith. Each of the Target Companies is in compliance with the terms of its Company Permits, except where the failure to comply would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company. No investigation or review by any Governmental Authority with respect to any of the Target Companies is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened, other than those
the outcome of which would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. To the knowledge of the Company, no other party to any Company Material Agreement is in
material breach of the terms, provisions or conditions of such Company Material Agreement. Each Company Material Agreement (other than those listed in the Company's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003, or in subsequent
A-23
filings, as an exhibit to the Company SEC Documents) is listed on Section 3.11 of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
Section 3.12 Governmental Regulation. None of the Target Companies is subject to regulation
under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, the Federal Power Act, the Interstate Commerce Act,
the Investment Company Act of 1940 or any state public utilities laws.
Section 3.13 Litigation. (a) No litigation, arbitration, investigation or other proceeding
is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against any of the Target
Companies or their respective assets which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; and (b) none of the Target Companies is subject to any outstanding
injunction, judgment, order, decree or ruling (other than routine oil and gas field regulatory orders). There is no litigation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened against or affecting any of the Target Companies that questions the validity or enforceability of this Agreement or any other document, instrument or agreement to be executed and delivered
by the Company in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 3.14 No Restrictions. None of the Target Companies is a party to: (a) any agreement,
indenture or other instrument that contains restrictions with respect to the payment of
dividends or other distributions with respect to its capital, other than the Company Bank Credit Agreement; (b) any financial arrangement with respect to or creating any indebtedness to any
Person (other than indebtedness (i) reflected in the Company Financial Statements and, with respect to any indebtedness that is material (individually or, together with related items, in the
aggregate) listed in Section 3.14 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, (ii) under the Company Bank Credit Agreement, or (iii) incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practices since September 30, 2004), unless such indebtedness is not material (individually or, together with related items, in the aggregate) to the Target Companies taken as a
whole; (c) any agreement, contract or commitment relating to the making of any advance to, or investment in, any Person (other than restrictions under the Company Bank Credit Agreement and
advances in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices); (d) any guaranty or other contingent liability with respect to any indebtedness or obligation of any Person
(other than (i) guaranties pursuant to the Company Bank Credit Agreement, (ii) guaranties undertaken in the ordinary course of business, and (iii) the endorsement of negotiable
instruments for collection in the ordinary course of business); or (e) any agreement, contract or commitment limiting in any respect its ability to compete with any Person or otherwise conduct
business of any line or nature. The amount of the guaranty by Company under the Continuing Guaranty by the Company to Compass Bank, dated December 20, 2004, with respect to indebtedness of
Metrix Networks, Inc., does not exceed $500,000, in terms of its total commitment or its current guaranty.
(a) Each of the Target Companies and any affiliated, consolidated, combined, aggregated, or unitary group of which any such entity is or was a member has (i) timely filed in accordance with applicable law all Tax Returns required to be filed by it (all such Tax Returns being accurate and complete in all material respects), (ii) timely paid all Taxes required to be paid by it (whether shown on a Tax Return or not) other than Taxes that are not yet due, (iii) complied with all applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the payment and withholding of Taxes, and (iv) timely withheld from employee wages and paid over to the proper Governmental Authorities all amounts required to be so withheld and paid over, except where the failure to file, pay, comply with or withhold would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
(b) (i) No audits or other administrative or court proceedings are presently pending with regard to any material Taxes for which any of the Target Companies would be liable; and (ii) there are no pending requests for Tax rulings from any Governmental Authority, no outstanding
A-24
subpoenas or requests for information by any Governmental Authority with respect to any Taxes, no proposed reassessments by any Governmental Authority of any property owned or leased, and no agreements in effect to extend the time to file any Tax Return or the period of limitations for the assessment or collection of any Taxes for which any of the Target Companies would be liable.
(c) (i) There are no Liens on any of the assets of the Target Companies for unpaid Taxes, other than Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable; (ii) none of the Target Companies has any liability for the Taxes of any other Person (other than one or more of the Target Companies) under Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any analogous state, local or foreign law), as a successor or transferee, or by contract; and (iii) none of the Target Companies is a party to or bound by any Tax sharing, allocation, indemnification, or similar agreement or arrangement (other than such an agreement or arrangement exclusively between or among two or more of the Target Companies).
(d) The amount of liability for unpaid Taxes of the Target Companies does not, in the aggregate, materially exceed the amount of the liability accruals and reserves for Taxes reflected on the Company Financial Statements. None of the Target Companies shall be required to include any material item of income in, or exclude any material item of deduction from, taxable income for any taxable period (or portion thereof) ending after the Closing Date as a result of any (i) change in method of accounting for a taxable period ending on or prior to the Closing Date under Section 481(c) of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law), (ii) "closing agreement" as described in Section 7121 of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law) executed on or prior to the Closing Date, or (iii) deferred intercompany gain or excess loss account described in Treasury Regulations under Section 1502 of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law).
(e) (i) None of the Target Companies is required to treat any of its assets as owned by another person for United States federal income tax purposes or as tax-exempt bond financed property or tax-exempt use property within the meaning of Section 168 of the Code; (ii) none of the Target Companies has participated in any international boycott as defined in Section 999 of the Code; and (iii) none of the Target Companies has or has ever conducted branch operations in any foreign country within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.367(a)-6T.
(f) No shareholder of the Company that is a Non-U.S. Holder has owned more than five percent of any class of the outstanding stock of the Company at any time during the immediately preceding five-year period.
(g) None of the Target Companies has been a "distributing corporation" or a "controlled corporation" in a distribution intended to qualify for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code (i) in the two-year period ending on the date of this Agreement or (ii) in a distribution that could, in conjunction with the Merger, otherwise constitute part of a "plan" or "series of related transactions" (within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Code).
(h) None of the Target Companies has entered into, has any liability in respect of, or has any filing obligations with respect to, any "reportable transactions" as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(1) or similar provision of state law.
(i) Within the last three years, neither the Company nor any of its Affiliates has owned any material assets located outside the United States or conducted a material trade or business outside the United States.
(j) All of the transactions which the Company has accounted for as hedges under SFAS 133 have also been treated as hedging transactions for United States federal income Tax purposes pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.1221-2.
A-25
Section 3.16 Employee Benefit Plans.
(a) Section 3.16(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of each of the following which is or has been sponsored, maintained or contributed to by the Company or any trade or business, whether or not incorporated (a "Company ERISA Affiliate"), or in which any employee or co-employee of any of the Target Companies participates or is covered, that together with the Company would be considered affiliated with the Company or any Company ERISA Affiliate under Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code or Section 4001(b)(1) of ERISA for the benefit of any person who, as of the Closing, is a current or former employee or subcontractor of the Company or any Company ERISA Affiliate: (i) each "employee benefit plan," as such term is defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA (each, a "Company Plan"); and (ii) each personnel policy, stock option plan, bonus plan or arrangement, incentive award plan or arrangement, vacation policy, severance or retention pay plan, policy, program or agreement, deferred compensation agreement or arrangement, executive compensation or supplemental income arrangement, retiree benefit plan or arrangement, fringe benefit program or practice (whether or not taxable), employee loan, consulting agreement, employment agreement and each other employee benefit plan, agreement, arrangement, program, practice or understanding which is not described in clause (i) above (each, a "Company Benefit Program or Agreement") (the Company Plans and Company Benefit Programs or Agreements are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Company Employee Benefit Plans").
(b) True, correct and complete copies of each of the Company Plans and related trusts, if applicable, including all amendments thereto, have been delivered to Parent. There has also been delivered to Parent, with respect to each Company Plan required to file such report and description, the report on Form 5500 for the past three years, to the extent applicable, and the most recent summary plan description and summaries of material modifications thereto. True, correct and complete copies or descriptions of all Company Benefit Programs or Agreements have also been delivered to Parent.
(c) (i) None of the Company, any Company ERISA Affiliate or any entity that, at any time during the past six years, was required to be treated as a single employer together with the Company or a Company ERISA Affiliate pursuant to Section 414 of the Code contributes to or has an obligation to contribute to, nor has at any time contributed to or had an obligation to contribute to, a multiemployer plan within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA or any other plan subject to Title IV of ERISA; (ii) each of the Company and the Company ERISA Affiliates has performed all obligations, whether arising by operation of law or by contract, including ERISA and the Code, required to be performed by it in connection with the Company Employee Benefit Plans, and, to the knowledge of the Company, there have been no defaults or violations by any other party to the Company Employee Benefit Plans; (iii) all reports, returns, notices, disclosures and other documents relating to the Company Plans required to be filed with or furnished to governmental entities, plan participants or plan beneficiaries have been timely filed or furnished in accordance with applicable law, and each Company Employee Benefit Plan has been administered in compliance with its governing written documents; (iv) each of the Company Plans intended to be qualified under Section 401 of the Code satisfies the requirements of such Section and has received a current favorable determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") regarding such qualified status and has not been amended, operated or administered in a way which would adversely affect such qualified status; (v) there are no actions, suits or claims pending (other than routine claims for benefits) or, to the knowledge of the Company, contemplated or threatened against, or with respect to, any of the Company Employee Benefit Plans or their assets; (vi) each trust maintained in connection with each Company Plan, which is qualified under Section 401 of the Code, is tax exempt under Section 501 of the Code; (vii) all contributions required to be made to the Company Employee Benefit Plans have been made timely; (viii) no
A-26
accumulated funding deficiency, whether or not waived, within the meaning of Section 302 of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code has been incurred, and there has been no termination or partial termination of any Company Plan within the meaning of Section 411(d)(3) of the Code; (ix) no act, omission or transaction has occurred which could result in imposition on the Company or any Company ERISA Affiliate of (A) breach of fiduciary duty liability damages under Section 409 of ERISA, (B) a civil penalty assessed pursuant to subsections (c), (i) or (1) of Section 502 of ERISA or (C) a tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 43 of Subtitle D of the Code; (x) to the knowledge of the Company, there is no matter pending with respect to any of the Company Plans before the IRS, the Department of Labor or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC"); (xi) each of the Company Employee Benefit Plans complies, in form and operation, with the applicable provisions of the Code and ERISA; (xii) each Company Employee Benefit Plan may be unilaterally amended or terminated in its entirety (otherwise than with respect to outstanding shares) without any liability or other obligation; (xiii) the Company and the Company ERISA Affiliates have no liabilities or other obligations, whether actual or contingent, under any Company Employee Benefit Plan for post-employment benefits of any nature (other than COBRA continuation coverage); and (xiv) neither the Company nor any of the Company ERISA Affiliates or any present or former director, officer, employee or other agent of the Company or any of the Company ERISA Affiliates has made any written or oral representations or promises to any present or former director, officer, employee or other agent concerning his or her terms, conditions or benefits of employment, including the tenure of any such employment or the conditions under which such employment may be terminated by the Company, any of the Company ERISA Affiliates or Parent which will be binding upon or enforceable against Parent or the Company after the Effective Time.
(d) No employee is currently on a leave of absence due to sickness or disability and no claim is pending or expected to be made by an employee, former employee or independent contractor for workers' compensation benefits.
(e) With respect to the Company Employee Benefit Plans, there exists no condition or set of circumstances in connection with any of the Target Companies that could be expected to result in liability reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company under ERISA, the Code or any other applicable law. With respect to the Company Employee Benefit Plans, individually and in the aggregate, there are no unfunded benefit obligations which have not been accounted for by reserves, or otherwise properly footnoted in accordance with GAAP, on the financial statements of the Target Companies, which obligations are reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
(f) Neither the execution or delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall result in any payment becoming due to any employee or group of employees of any of the Target Companies.
(g) No amounts payable or that could become payable under any Company Employee Benefit Plan as a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise shall fail to be deductible for Federal income tax purposes by virtue of either Section 280G or 162(m) of the Code.
A-27
Section 3.17 Employment Contracts and Benefits. Except as otherwise provided for in any Company
Employee Benefit Plan: (a) none of the Target Companies is subject to or obligated under any consulting,
employment, severance, retention, termination or similar arrangement, any employee benefit, incentive or deferred compensation plan with respect to any Person, or any bonus, profit sharing, pension,
stock option, stock purchase or similar plan or other arrangement or other fringe benefit plan entered into or maintained for the benefit of employees of any of the Target Companies or any other
Person; and (b) no employee of any of the Target Companies or any other Person owns, or has any right granted by any of the Target Companies to acquire, any interest in any of the assets or
business of any of the Target Companies.
(a) No employees of any of the Target Companies are represented by any labor organization. No labor organization or group of employees of any of the Target Companies has made a demand for recognition or certification as a union or other labor organization, and there are no representation or certification proceedings or petitions seeking a representation or certification proceeding presently pending or threatened in writing to be brought or filed with the National Labor Relations Board or any other labor relations tribunal or authority. There are no organizing activities involving any of the Target Companies pending with any labor organization or group of employees of any of the Target Companies.
(b) Each of the Target Companies is in compliance with all laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to the employment of labor, including all such laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to wages, hours, collective bargaining, discrimination, civil rights, safety and health, workers' compensation and the collection and payment of income Tax withholding, Social Security Taxes, Medicare Taxes and similar Taxes, except where the failure to comply would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
Section 3.19 Insurance. Each of the Target Companies maintains, and through the Closing Date will
maintain, insurance with reputable insurers (or pursuant to prudent
self-insurance programs described in Section 3.19 of the Company Disclosure Schedule) in such amounts and covering such risks as are in accordance with prudent industry practice for
companies engaged in businesses of a size and scope similar to those of the Target Companies and owning properties in the same general area in which the Target Companies conduct their businesses. None
of such insurance coverage was obtained through the use of false or misleading information or the failure to provide the insurer with all information requested in order to evaluate the liabilities and
risks insured. There is no material default with respect to any provision contained in any such policy or binder, and none of the Target Companies has failed to give any notice or present any claim
under any such policy or binder in due and timely fashion. There are no billed but unpaid premiums past due under any such policy or binder. (a) There are no outstanding claims under any such
policies or binders and, to the knowledge of the Company, there has not occurred any event that might reasonably form the basis of any claim against or relating to any of the Target Companies that is
not covered by any of such policies or binders; (b) no notice of cancellation or non-renewal of any such policies or binders has been received or threatened; and (c) there
are no performance bonds outstanding with respect to any of the Target Companies.
Section 3.20 Intellectual Property. There is no intellectual or intangible property (including,
without limitation, legally enforceable licenses or other rights to use, any and all United States and
foreign patents, patent applications, patent disclosures, mask works, computer software, geophysical data, trademarks, trade dress, trade names, logos, Internet domain names, copyrights and service
marks, including applications to register and registrations for any of the foregoing, as well as trade secrets, know-how, data and other proprietary rights and information) that is
necessary for the operation, or continued operation, of the business of any of the Target Companies or for the ownership and operation, or continued ownership and operation, of any of their assets,
for which the Target
A-28
Companies do not hold valid and continuing authority in connection with the use thereof. The businesses of the Target Companies, as presently conducted, do not conflict with, infringe or violate any intellectual property rights of any other Person, and none of the Target Companies has received any claim regarding such conflict, infringement or violation, except where (in either case) any such conflict, infringement or violation could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
Section 3.21 Title to Assets. The Target Companies (individually or collectively) have
Defensible Title to (i) the Oil and Gas Interests of the Company included or reflected in the
Target Companies' Ownership Interests, (ii) the Target Companies' gas plants and gas gathering systems referenced in the Company SEC Documents and (iii) all other assets of the Target
Companies (other than in the case of this item (iii) those assets for which the failure to have Defensible Title would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in Material Adverse Effect
on the Target Companies, taken as a whole). Each Oil and Gas Interest included or reflected in the Company's Ownership Interests entitles the Target Companies (individually or collectively) to receive
not less than the undivided interest set forth in (or derived from) the Ownership Interests of the Target Companies of all Hydrocarbons produced, saved and sold from or attributable to such Oil and
Gas Interest, and the portion of the costs and expenses of operation and development of such Oil and Gas Interest that is borne or to be borne by the Target Companies (individually or collectively) is
not greater than the undivided interest set forth in (or derived from) the Target Companies' Ownership Interests. The oil and gas leases and other agreements that provide the Target Companies with
operating rights in the Oil and Gas Interests included or reflected in the Target Companies' Ownership Interests are legal, valid and binding and in full force and effect, and the rentals, royalties
and other payments due thereunder have been properly and timely paid and there is no existing default (or event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default) under any of such
oil and gas leases or other agreements, except in each case as have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
Section 3.22 Oil and Gas Operations.
(a) All wells included in the Oil and Gas Interests of the Company have been drilled and (if completed) completed, operated and produced in accordance with generally accepted oil and gas field practices and in compliance in all material respects with applicable oil and gas leases and applicable laws, rules and regulations, except where any failure or violation could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
(b) Proceeds from the sale of Hydrocarbons produced from the Company's Oil and Gas Interests are being received by the Target Companies in a timely manner and are not being held in suspense for any reason (except in the ordinary course of business).
(c) None of the Target Companies has received any material advance, take-or-pay or other similar payments that entitle purchasers of production to receive deliveries of Hydrocarbons without paying therefor, and, on a net, company-wide basis, the Target Companies are neither underproduced nor overproduced, in either case, to any material extent, under gas balancing or similar arrangements.
(d) No claim, notice or order from any Governmental Authority or other Person has been received by any of the Target Companies due to Hydrocarbon production in excess of allowables or similar violations that could result in curtailment of production after the Closing Date from any Oil and Gas Interests of the Company, except any such violations which individually or in the aggregate have not had, and would not be reasonably likely to have or result in, a Material Adverse Effect on the Target Companies.
A-29
(e) All material operating equipment owned or leased by the Target Companies is, in the aggregate, in a state of repair so as to be adequate in all material respects for reasonably prudent operations in the areas in which they are operated.
Section 3.23 Oil and Gas Reserves. The factual, non-interpretive data related to oil and gas
reserves reflected in the Company Reserve Report was, as of the date of the Company Reserve
Report, accurate in all material respects.
Section 3.24 Derivative Transactions and Hedging. Section 3.24 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule contains a complete and correct list of all Derivative Transactions (including each outstanding Hydrocarbon
or financial hedging position attributable to the Hydrocarbon production of the Target Companies) entered into by the Target Companies or for the account of any of its customers as of the date of this
Agreement. All such Derivative Transactions were, and any Derivative Transactions entered into after the date of this Agreement will be, entered into in accordance with applicable laws, and in
accordance with the investment, securities, commodities, risk management and other policies, practices and procedures employed by the Target Companies. The Target Companies have duly performed in all
material respects all of their respective obligations under the Derivative Transactions to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued, and, to the knowledge of the Company, there are no
material breaches, violations, collateral deficiencies, requests for collateral or demands for payment (except for ordinary course margin deposit requests), or defaults or allegations or assertions of
such by any party thereunder.
Section 3.25 Natural Gas Act. Any gas gathering system constituting a part of the properties of
the Target Companies has as its primary function the provision of natural gas gathering
services, as the term "gathering" is interpreted under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act (the "NGA"); none of the properties has been or is
certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the "FERC") under Section 7(c) of the NGA or to the knowledge of the Company is now
subject to FERC jurisdiction under the NGA; and none of the properties has been or is providing service pursuant to Section 311 of the NGA.
Section 3.26 Environmental Matters.
(a) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, none of the Target Companies is subject to any liability or obligation (accrued, contingent, or otherwise) to investigate, cleanup, correct, abate, or take any response, remedial or corrective action under Environmental Laws relating to (i) environmental conditions on, under, or about any of the properties or assets owned, leased, operated, or used by the Target Companies or any predecessor at the present time or in the past, or (ii) the past or present use, management, handling, transport, treatment, generation, storage, disposal, or release of any Hazardous Materials, whether on-site or off-site.
(b) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, all permits, notices, approvals and authorizations required to be obtained or filed in connection with the operation of the Target Companies' business or the operation or use of any property owned, leased, or operated by the Target Companies have been obtained or filed and are currently in effect, and the Target Companies are in compliance with the terms and conditions of such permits, notices, approvals and authorizations.
(c) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, each of the Target Companies has conducted its business and operated its assets, and is conducting its business and operating its assets, in compliance with all Environmental Laws;
(d) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, none of the Target Companies has been notified by any Governmental Authority or other Person or is otherwise aware that any of the current or prior operations or assets of any of the Target
A-30
Companies is the subject of any investigation or inquiry by any Governmental Authority or other Person under Environmental Laws;
(e) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, none of the Target Companies and, to the knowledge of the Company, no other Person has filed any notice under any federal, state or local law indicating that (i) any of the Target Companies is responsible for a release or threatened release into the environment, or the improper handling, generation, treatment, storage, disposal or recycling, of any Hazardous Material, on any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Target Companies or (ii) any Hazardous Material is improperly handled, generated, treated, stored, disposed of, or recycled upon any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Target Companies;
(f) None of the Target Companies has any liability in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate in connection with (i) the release or threatened release into the environment at, beneath or on any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Target Companies, (ii) any obligations under or violations of Environmental Laws, or (iii) the use, release, treatment, storage, disposal, or recycling of any Hazardous Material;
(g) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, there are no pending, or to the knowledge of Company threatened, claims, complaints, notices, inquiries or requests for information involving any matter which remains unresolved (i) under Environmental Laws against any person whose liability for environmental matters any Target Company has retained or assumed either contractually or by operation of law, or (ii) with respect to any alleged violation of any Environmental Law or regarding potential liability under any Environmental Law against any Target Company relating to operations or conditions of any facilities or property (including off-site treatment, storage, disposal, or recycling of any Hazardous Material from such facilities or property) currently or formerly owned, leased or operated by any of the Target Companies;
(h) No property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Target Companies is listed on the National Priorities List pursuant to CERCLA or on the CERCLIS or on any other similar federal or state list as sites requiring investigation or cleanup;
(i) To the knowledge of the Company, none of the Target Companies is transporting, has transported, or is arranging or has arranged for the transportation of any Hazardous Material to any location which is listed on the National Priorities List pursuant to CERCLA, on the CERCLIS, or on any similar federal or state list or which is the subject of federal, state or local enforcement actions or other investigations that may lead to claims in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate against any of the Target Companies for investigation, removal or remedial work, contribution for removal or remedial work, damage to natural resources or personal injury, including claims under CERCLA;
(j) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, none of the Target Companies owns or operates any underground storage tanks or solid waste storage, treatment and/or disposal facilities;
(k) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, to the knowledge of the Company, no asbestos, asbestos containing materials or polychlorinated biphenyls are present on or at any property or facility owned, leased or operated by any of the Target Companies;
(l) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, none of the Target Companies is operating, or required to be operating, any of its properties or facilities under any order, compliance or consent order, injunction, decree or agreement issued or entered into under, or pertaining to matters regulated by, any Environmental Law;
A-31
(m) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, none of the Target Companies has assumed contractually, or to the knowledge of the Company, by operation of law, any liabilities or obligations of third parties under Environmental Laws;
(n) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, the Company is not aware of any environmental conditions or circumstances that form, or are reasonably likely to give rise to, a claim against any Target Company or any Person whose liability for such claim any Target Company has retained or assumed contractually or by operation of law.
(o) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, no Target Company is subject to any environmental indemnification obligation regarding businesses currently or formerly owned or operated by a Target Company or regarding properties currently or formerly owned, leased or operated by a Target Company.
(p) No Target Company is required by virtue of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to perform an environmental site assessment or to remove or remediate any Hazardous Materials.
(q) The Company has provided or made available to Parent copies of all contracts in which a Target Company has retained, assumed, or provided indemnification for liabilities for environmental matters and all material environmental permits, notices, approvals, authorizations, claims, complaints, inquiries, requests for information, orders, compliance or consent orders, injunctions, decrees, agreements, reports, data, studies, results of investigations, audits, assessments, evaluations and correspondence in the possession, custody or control of any of the Target Companies.
Section 3.27 Books and Records. All books, records and files of the Target Companies (including
those pertaining to the Company's Oil and Gas Interests, wells and other assets, those pertaining
to the production, gathering, transportation and sale of Hydrocarbons, and corporate, accounting, financial and employee records): (a) have been prepared, assembled and maintained in accordance
with usual and customary policies and procedures, and (b) fairly and accurately reflect the ownership, use, enjoyment and operation by the Target Companies of their respective assets.
Section 3.28 Brokers. No broker, finder, investment banker or other Person is or will be, in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, entitled to any brokerage,
finder's or other fee or compensation based on any arrangement or agreement made by or on behalf of any of the Target Companies and for which Parent, Merger Sub or any of the Target Companies shall
have any obligation or liability.
Section 3.29 Vote Required. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of Company Common Stock is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of
Company capital stock or other voting securities necessary to approve this Agreement, the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 3.30 State Takeover Laws. The Company has taken all necessary action to exempt the Merger
from any applicable moratorium, fair price, business combination, control share and other
anti-takeover laws under the NRS.
Section 3.31 Affiliate Transactions. Section 3.31 of the Company Disclosure Schedule
contains a complete and correct list, as of the date of this Agreement, of all agreements, contracts,
transfers of assets or liabilities or other commitments or transactions, whether or not entered into in the ordinary course of business, to or by which the Company or any of its subsidiaries, on the
one hand, and any of their respective Affiliates (other than the Company or any of its direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries) on the other hand, are or have been a party or otherwise bound or
affected, and that (a) are currently pending, in effect or have been in effect during the past 12 months, (b) involve
A-32
continuing liabilities and obligations that, individually or in the aggregate, have been, are or will be material to the Target Companies, taken as a whole and (c) are not Company Plans.
Section 3.32 Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Since January 1, 2003, the Company and
each of its subsidiaries has had in place "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in
Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Exchange Act) designed and maintained to ensure in all material respects that (a) transactions are executed in accordance
with management's general or specific authorizations, (b) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain
accountability for assets, (c) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's general or specific authorization, (d) the recorded accountability for assets is
compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences, (e) all information (both financial and non-financial)
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules
and forms of the SEC and (f) all such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make
the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company required under the Exchange Act with respect to such reports. The Company's disclosure controls and
procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Neither the Company nor its independent auditors have identified any "significant deficiencies" or "material weaknesses" in the Company's or any of its
subsidiaries' internal controls as contemplated under Section 404 of SOX. The Company has diligently completed in all material respects its work plan relating to documentation, testing and
evaluation of the Company's internal control over financial reporting for purposes of providing the report required by Section 404 of SOX and related SEC rules. As of the date of this
Agreement, to the knowledge of the Company, (i) there is no reason that it will not be able, on a timely basis, to complete and include in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, management's assessment of the Company's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in accordance with
Section 404 of SOX and (ii) there is no material weakness or significant deficiency, in each case as such term is defined in PCAOB Auditing Std. No. 2.
Section 3.33 Rights Agreement. The Company has taken all necessary action (including, if
required, amending the Company Rights Agreement) so that the entering into of this Agreement, the
acquisition of shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not enable or require the Company Rights to be
exercised or distributed.
Section 3.34 Opinion of Financial Advisor. The Company has received opinions of Deutsche Bank
and Merrill Lynch to the effect that, as of the date of this Agreement, the Conversion Number is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of shares of Company Common Stock, a signed copy of which has been delivered to Parent. The Company has received the approval of such financial advisor to
permit the inclusion of a copy of its written opinion in its entirety in the Proxy Statement, subject to such advisor's review thereof as presented in the Proxy Statement.
A-33
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Parent and Merger Sub hereby jointly and severally represent and warrant to the Company as follows, except as set forth, specifically with reference to a particular section below, on the Parent Disclosure Schedule:
Section 4.1 Organization. Each of the Parent Companies: (a) is a corporation or other
entity, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its state of
incorporation or formation, (b) has the requisite power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and to conduct its business as it is presently being conducted, and (c) is
duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation, limited liability company or limited partnership, as applicable, and is in good standing, in each jurisdiction where the character of the
properties owned or leased by it or the nature of its activities makes such qualification necessary (except where any failure to be so qualified or to be in good standing would not, individually or in
the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent). Accurate and complete copies of the articles of incorporation, minute books, other organizational documents and/or bylaws of each of the
Parent Companies have heretofore been delivered to the Company. Parent has no corporate or other subsidiaries other than the Parent Subsidiaries.
Section 4.2 Other Equity Interests. None of the Parent Companies owns any equity interest in any
general or limited partnership, corporation, limited liability company or joint venture other than
the Parent Subsidiaries or as listed on the Parent Disclosure Schedule (other than joint operating and other ownership arrangements and tax partnerships entered into in the ordinary course of business
that, individually or in the aggregate, are not material to the operations or business of the Parent Companies, taken as a whole, and that do not entail any material liabilities).
Section 4.3 Authority and Enforceability. Each of Parent and Merger Sub has the requisite
corporate power and authority to enter into and deliver this Agreement and (with respect to consummation of the
Merger, subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of Parent) to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and (with
respect to consummation of the Merger, subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of Parent) the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and
validly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of Parent and Merger Sub, including approval by the Board of Directors of Parent and the Board of Directors and stockholders of Merger
Sub, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of Parent or Merger Sub are necessary to authorize the execution or delivery of this Agreement or (with respect to consummation of the Merger,
subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of Parent) to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered
by Parent and Merger Sub and (with respect to consummation of the Merger, subject to the valid approval of the Company Proposal by the stockholders of Parent, and assuming that this Agreement
constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Company) constitutes a valid and binding obligation of each of Parent and Merger Sub enforceable against each of them in accordance with its terms.
Section 4.4 No Violations. The execution and delivery of this Agreement do not, and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and compliance by Parent and Merger Sub with the
provisions hereof will not, conflict with, result in any violation of or default (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) under, give rise to a right of termination, cancellation or
acceleration of any obligation or to the loss of a material benefit under, or result in the creation of any Lien on any of the properties or assets of any of the Parent Companies under, any provision
of (a) the certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or any other organizational documents of any of the Parent Companies, (b) any loan or credit agreement, note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, lease, permit,
A-34
concession, franchise, license or other agreement or instrument applicable to any of the Parent Companies (other than any such conflict, violation, default, right, loss or Lien that may arise under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement), or (c) assuming the consents, approvals, authorizations, permits, filings and notifications referred to in Section 4.5 are duly and timely obtained or made, any judgment, order, decree, statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation applicable to any of the Parent Companies or any of their respective properties or assets, other than, in the case of clause (b) or (c) above, any such conflict, violation, default, right, loss or Lien that, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
Section 4.5 Consents and Approvals. No consent, approval, order or authorization of, registration,
declaration or filing with, or permit from, any Governmental Authority is required by or with
respect to any of the Parent Companies in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub or the consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of the transactions
contemplated hereby, except for the following: (a) any such consent, approval, order, authorization, registration, declaration, filing or permit which the failure to obtain or make would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent; (b) the filing of the Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State of Nevada pursuant to applicable provisions of
the NRS; (c) the filing of a pre-merger notification report by Parent as may be required under the HSR Act and the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period;
(d) the filing with the SEC of the Registration Statement and such reports under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and such other compliance with the Exchange Act and the Securities Act
and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder as may be required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and the obtaining from the SEC of such orders as may
be so required; (e) the filing with a National Stock Exchange of a listing application relating to the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the Merger and the obtaining from
such exchange of its approvals thereof; (f) such filings and approvals as may be required by any applicable state securities, "blue sky" or takeover laws or Environmental Laws; and
(g) such filings and approvals as may be required by any foreign pre-merger notification, securities, corporate or other law, rule or regulation. No Third-Party Consent is required
by or with respect to Parent, Merger Sub or any Parent Subsidiary in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, except
for (x) any such Third-Party Consent which the failure to obtain would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, (y) the valid approval of the
Company Proposal (including the issuance of the Parent Common Stock in the Merger) by the stockholders of Parent, and (z) any consent, approval or waiver required by the terms of the Parent
Bank Credit Agreement.
Section 4.6 SEC Documents. Parent (i) has made available to Company a true and complete
copy of each report, schedule, registration statement and definitive proxy statement filed by
Parent with the SEC since September 30, 2002, (and by Key Production Company, Inc. from January 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002) and prior to the date of this Agreement and
any amendments thereto, including exhibits and other information incorporated therein (the "Parent SEC Documents"), which are all the documents (other
than preliminary material) that Parent was required to file with the SEC since such date, and (ii) has delivered to the Company a true and complete copy of all correspondence between the SEC
and any of the Parent Companies since January 1, 2003. Each of the Parent SEC Documents was timely filed with the SEC. As of their respective dates, each of the Parent SEC Documents, as amended
(including the financial statements and schedules provided therein or incorporated by reference therein) (i) complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act, the
Exchange Act and SOX, as the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder applicable to such Parent SEC Documents, and (ii) did not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
A-35
Section 4.7 Financial Statements. The Parent Financial Statements were prepared in accordance
with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the
notes thereto or, in the case of unaudited statements, as permitted by Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the SEC) and fairly present (in the case of the unaudited
statements, subject to normal, recurring adjustments) the consolidated financial position of Parent and its subsidiaries as of their respective dates and the consolidated results of operations and the
consolidated cash flows of Parent and its subsidiaries for the periods presented therein. The books and records of the Parent Companies have been, and are being, maintained in accordance with GAAP and
any other applicable legal and accounting requirements and reflect only actual transactions. KPMG LLP is an independent public accounting firm with respect to the Parent Companies and has not resigned
or been dismissed by the Parent Companies from such capacity.
Section 4.8 Capital Structure.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Parent consists of 100,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock and 15,000,000 shares of Parent Preferred Stock. The authorized capital stock of Merger Sub consists of 1,000 shares of Merger Sub Common Stock.
(b) As of the close of business on January 24, 2005, there are issued and outstanding 41,736,475 shares of Parent Common Stock and no shares of Parent Preferred Stock. 2,648,204 shares of Parent Common Stock are issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options. As of the date hereof, no shares of Parent Common Stock and no shares of Parent Preferred Stock were held by Parent as treasury stock.
(c) Except as set forth in Section 4.8(b), there are outstanding (i) no shares of capital stock or other voting securities of Parent, (ii) no securities of Parent or any other Person convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other voting securities of Parent, (iii) no stock appreciation rights or phantom stock rights to which any of the Parent Companies are obligated and (iv) no subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights (including preemptive rights), commitments, understandings or agreements to which Parent is a party or by which it is bound obligating Parent to issue, deliver, sell, purchase, redeem or acquire shares of capital stock or other voting securities of Parent (or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other voting securities of Parent) or obligating Parent to grant, extend or enter into any such subscription, option, warrant, call, right, commitment, understanding or agreement.
(d) All outstanding shares of Parent capital stock are, and (when issued) the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the Merger and upon exercise of the Company Stock Options and Company Warrants will be, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to any preemptive right. There are no shares of Parent capital stock reserved for issuance.
(e) 1,000 shares of Merger Sub Common Stock are issued and outstanding, all of which are owned by Parent. All outstanding shares of capital stock and other voting securities of Merger Sub and of each of the other corporate Parent Subsidiaries are (i) validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to any preemptive right, and (ii) owned by the Parent Companies, free and clear of all Liens, claims and options of any nature (except Permitted Encumbrances). There are outstanding (y) no securities of any Parent Subsidiary or any other Person convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock, other voting securities or other equity interests of such Parent Subsidiary, and (z) no subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights (including preemptive rights), commitments, understandings or agreements to which any Parent Subsidiary is a party or by which it is bound obligating such Parent Subsidiary to issue, deliver, sell, purchase, redeem or acquire shares of capital stock, other voting securities or other equity interests of such Parent Subsidiary (or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock, other voting securities or other equity interests of such Parent Subsidiary) or
A-36
obligating any Parent Subsidiary to grant, extend or enter into any such subscription, option, warrant, call, right, commitment, understanding or agreement.
(f) There is no stockholder agreement, voting trust or other agreement or understanding to which Parent is a party or by which it is bound relating to the voting of any shares of the capital stock of any of the Parent Companies. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of the Parent Companies having the right to vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable for, securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which the stockholders of any of the Parent Companies may vote.
(g) None of the Parent Companies is obligated to redeem or otherwise repurchase any of its capital stock.
(h) Parent is in compliance with the applicable listing rules of the New York Stock Exchange and has not, since January 1, 2003, received any notice from the New York Stock Exchange asserting any non-compliance with such rules.
Section 4.9 No Undisclosed Liabilities. There are no material liabilities of any of the Parent
Companies of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or
otherwise, other than (a) liabilities adequately provided for in the Parent Financial Statements, (b) liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business subsequent to
September 30, 2004, (c) liabilities under this Agreement, and (d) liabilities set forth on Section 4.9 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule.
Section 4.10 Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Except as specifically contemplated by this
Agreement, since September 30, 2004, none of the Parent Companies has done any of the following:
(a) Discharged or satisfied any Lien or paid any obligation or liability, absolute or contingent, other than current liabilities incurred and paid in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
(b) Paid or declared any dividends or distributions, purchased, redeemed, acquired or retired any indebtedness, stock or other securities from its stockholders or other securityholders, made any loans or advances or guaranteed any loans or advances to any Person (other than loans, advances or guaranties made in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices), or otherwise incurred or suffered to exist any liabilities (other than current liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(c) Except for Permitted Encumbrances, suffered or permitted any Lien to arise or be granted or created against or upon any of its assets;
(d) Canceled, waived or released any rights or claims against, or indebtedness owed by, third parties (including, without limitation, any standstill agreements);
(e) Amended its certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational documents;
(f) Made or permitted any amendment, supplement, modification or termination of, or any acceleration under, any Parent Material Agreement;
(g) Sold, leased, transferred, assigned or otherwise disposed of (i) any Oil and Gas Interests of Parent that, individually or in the aggregate, had a value of $1,000,000 or more, or (ii) any other assets that, individually or in the aggregate, had a value at the time of such lease, transfer, assignment or disposition of $1,000,000 or more (and, in each case where a sale, lease, transfer, assignment or other disposition was made, it was made for fair consideration in the ordinary course of business); provided, however, that this Section 4.10(g) shall not apply to the sale of Hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business;
A-37
(h) Made any investment in or contribution, payment, advance or loan to any Person (other than investments, contributions, payments or advances, or commitments with respect thereto, less than $1,000,000 in the aggregate, made in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(i) Paid, loaned or advanced (other than the payment, advance or reimbursement of expenses in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices) any amounts to, or sold, transferred or leased any of its assets to, or entered into any other transaction with, any of its Affiliates other than the Parent Companies;
(j) Made any material change in any of the accounting principles followed by it or the method of applying such principles;
(k) Entered into any material transaction (other than this Agreement) except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
(l) Increased benefits or benefit plan costs or changed bonus, insurance, pension, compensation or other benefit plan or arrangement or granted any bonus or increase in wages, salary or other compensation or made any other change in employment terms to (or entered into severance or retention arrangements of any type with) any officer, director or employee of any of the Parent Companies (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(m) Issued any note, bond or other debt security or created, incurred, assumed or guaranteed any indebtedness for borrowed money or capitalized lease obligation involving more than $1,000,000 in the aggregate (other than pursuant to the Parent Bank Credit Agreement);
(n) Delayed, postponed or accelerated the payment of accounts payable or other liabilities (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(o) Canceled, compromised, waived or released any right or claim (or series of related rights and claims) involving more than $1,000,000 in the aggregate (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(p) Issued, sold, or otherwise disposed of any of its capital stock or other equity interest or granted any option, warrant, or other right to purchase or obtain (including upon conversion, exchange, or exercise) any of its capital stock or other equity interest (or reduced the exercise or conversion price or extended the time for exercise or conversion, other than in accordance with mandatory contractual provisions, of any rights, options or warrants to acquire its capital stock or securities);
(q) Made any loan to, or entered into any other transaction with, any of its directors, officers or employees (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices and not involving more than $100,000 in the aggregate);
(r) Made or pledged to make any charitable or other capital contribution outside the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
(s) Made or committed to make capital expenditures in excess of $150,000,000 in the aggregate;
(t) Made or changed any material Tax election or settled or compromised any material income Tax liability;
(u) Entered into, modified or amended any Derivative Transaction;
A-38
(v) Otherwise been involved in any other material occurrence, event, incident, action, failure to act, or transaction involving any of the Parent Companies (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(w) Entered into any transaction with an Affiliate (except in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices);
(x) Agreed, whether in writing or otherwise, to do any of the foregoing; or
(y) Suffered any Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.11 Compliance with Laws, Material Agreements and Permits. None of the Parent Companies
is in violation of, or in default under, and no event has occurred that (with notice or the lapse of time or both) would constitute a
violation of or default under: (a) its certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational documents, (b) any applicable law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order,
writ, decree or judgment of any Governmental Authority, or (c) any Parent Material Agreement, except (in the case of clause (b) or (c) above) for any violation or default that
would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. Each of the Parent Companies has obtained and holds all permits, licenses, variances, exemptions, orders,
franchises, approvals and authorizations of all Governmental Authorities necessary for the lawful conduct of its business and the lawful ownership, use and operation of its assets
("Parent Permits"), except for Parent Permits which the failure to obtain or hold would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect on Parent. None of the Parent Permits shall be adversely affected by the consummation of the transactions contemplated under this Agreement or requires any filing or consent in connection
therewith. Each of the Parent Companies is in compliance with the terms of its Parent Permits, except where the failure to comply would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect on Parent. No investigation or review by any Governmental Authority with respect to any of the Parent Companies is pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened, other than those the
outcome of which would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. To the knowledge of Parent, no other party to any Parent Material Agreement is in material
breach of the terms, provisions or conditions of such Parent Material Agreement. Each Parent Material Agreement (other than those listed in Parent's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, or in subsequent filings, as an exhibit to the Parent SEC Documents) is listed on Section 4.11 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule.
Section 4.12 Governmental Regulation. No Parent Company is subject to regulation under the
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, the Federal Power Act, the Interstate Commerce Act, the
Investment Company Act of 1940 or any state public utilities laws.
Section 4.13 Litigation. (a) No litigation, arbitration, investigation or other proceeding
is pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened against any of the Parent Companies
or their respective assets which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent; and (b) no Parent Company is subject to any outstanding injunction, judgment, order,
decree or ruling (other than routine oil and gas field regulatory orders). There is no litigation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened against or affecting
any of the Parent Companies that questions the validity or enforceability of this Agreement or any other document, instrument or agreement to be executed and delivered by Parent in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 4.14 Interim Operations of Merger Sub. Merger Sub was formed solely for the purpose of
engaging in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and has not engaged in any business or activity (or
conducted any operations) of any kind, entered into any agreement or arrangement with any person or entity, or incurred, directly or indirectly, any liabilities or obligations, except in
A-39
connection with its incorporation, the negotiation of this Agreement, the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 4.15 No Restrictions. None of the Parent Companies is a party to: (a) any agreement,
indenture or other instrument that contains restrictions with respect to the payment of
dividends or other distributions with respect to its capital, other than the Parent Bank Credit Agreement; (b) any financial arrangement with respect to or creating any indebtedness to any
Person (other than indebtedness (i) reflected in the Parent Financial Statements and, with respect to any indebtedness that is material (individually or, together with related items, in the
aggregate) listed in Section 4.15 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, (ii) under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement, or (iii) incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practices since September 30, 2004) unless such indebtedness is not material (individually or, together with related items, in the aggregate) to the Parent Companies taken as a whole;
(c) any agreement, contract or commitment relating to the making of any advance to, or investment in, any Person (other than restrictions under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement and advances in
the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices); (d) any guaranty or other contingent liability with respect to any indebtedness or obligation of any Person (other than
(i) guaranties pursuant to the Parent Bank Credit Agreement, (ii) guaranties undertaken in the ordinary course of business, and (iii) the endorsement of negotiable instruments for
collection in the ordinary course of business); or (e) any agreement, contract or commitment limiting in any respect its ability to compete with any Person or otherwise conduct business of any
line or nature.
(a) Each of the Parent Companies and any affiliated, consolidated, combined, aggregated, or unitary group of which any such entity is or was a member has: (i) timely filed in accordance with the applicable law all Tax Returns required to be filed by it (all such Tax Returns being accurate and complete in all material respects), (ii) timely paid all Taxes required to be paid by it (whether shown on a Tax Return or not) other than Taxes that are not yet due, (iii) complied with all applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the payment and withholding of Taxes, and (iv) timely withheld from employee wages and paid over to the proper Governmental Authorities all amounts required to be so withheld and paid over, except where the failure to file, pay, comply with or withhold would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
(b) (i) No audits or other administrative or court proceedings are presently pending with regard to any material Taxes for which any of the Parent Companies would be liable; and (ii) there are no pending requests for Tax rulings from any Governmental Authority, no outstanding subpoenas or requests for information by any Governmental Authority with respect to any Taxes, no proposed reassessments by any Governmental Authority of any property owned or leased, and no agreements in effect to extend the time to file any Tax Return or the period of limitations for the assessment or collection of any Taxes for which any of the Parent Companies would be liable.
(c) (i) There are no Liens on any of the assets of the Parent Companies for unpaid Taxes, other than Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable; (ii) no Parent Company has any liability for the Taxes of any other Person (other than one or more of the Parent Companies) under Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any analogous state, local or foreign law), as a successor or transferee, or by contract; and (iii) no Parent Company is a party to or bound by any Tax sharing, allocation, indemnification, or similar agreement or arrangement (other than such an agreement or arrangement exclusively between or among two or more of the Parent Companies).
A-40
(d) The amount of liability for unpaid Taxes of the Parent Companies does not, in the aggregate, materially exceed the amount of the liability accruals and reserves for Taxes reflected on the Parent Financial Statements. None of the Parent Companies shall be required to include any material item of income in, or exclude any material item of deduction from, taxable income for any taxable period (or portion thereof) ending after the Closing Date as a result of any (i) change in method of accounting for a taxable period ending on or prior to the Closing Date under Section 481(c) of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law), (ii) "closing agreement" as described in Section 7121 of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law) executed on or prior to the Closing Date, or (iii) deferred intercompany gain or excess loss account described in Treasury Regulations under Section 1502 of the Code (or any corresponding or similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law).
(e) (i) no Parent Company is required to treat any of its assets as owned by another person for United States federal income tax purposes or as tax-exempt bond financed property or tax-exempt use property within the meaning of Section 168 of the Code; (ii) no Parent Company has participated in any international boycott as defined in Section 999 of the Code; and (iii) no Parent Company has or has ever conducted branch operations in any foreign country within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.367(a)-6T.
(f) No shareholder of Parent that is a Non-U.S. Holder has owned more than five percent of any class of the outstanding stock of Parent at any time during the immediately preceding five-year period.
(g) None of the Parent Companies has been a "distributing corporation" or a "controlled corporation" in a distribution intended to qualify for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code (i) in the two-year period ending on the date of this Agreement or (ii) in a distribution that could, in conjunction with the Merger, otherwise constitute part of a "plan" or "series of related transactions" (within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Code).
(h) None of the Parent Companies has entered into, has any liability in respect of, or has any filing obligations with respect to, any "reportable transactions" as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(1) or similar provision of state law.
(i) Within the last three years, neither Parent nor any of its Affiliates has owned any material assets located outside the United States or conducted a material trade or business outside the United States.
(j) All of the transactions which Parent has accounted for as hedges under SFAS 133 have also been treated as hedging transactions for United States federal income Tax purposes pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.1221-2.
Section 4.17 Employee Benefit Plans.
(a) Section 4.17 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of each of the following which is or has been sponsored, maintained or contributed to by Parent or any trade or business, whether or not incorporated (a "Parent ERISA Affiliate"), or in which any employee or co-employee of any of the Parent Companies participates or is covered, that together with Parent would be considered affiliated with Parent or any Parent ERISA Affiliate under Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code or Section 4001(b)(1) of ERISA for the benefit of any person who, as of the Closing, is a current or former employee or subcontractor of Parent or any Parent ERISA Affiliate: (i) each "employee benefit plan," as such term is defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA (each, a "Parent Plan"); and (ii) each personnel policy, stock option plan, bonus plan or arrangement, incentive award plan or arrangement, vacation policy, severance or retention pay plan, policy, program or agreement, deferred compensation agreement or arrangement, executive
A-41
compensation or supplemental income arrangement, retiree benefit plan or arrangement, fringe benefit program or practice (whether or not taxable), employee loan, consulting agreement, employment agreement and each other employee benefit plan, agreement, arrangement, program, practice or understanding which is not described in clause (i) above (each, a "Parent Benefit Program or Agreement") (the Parent Plans and Parent Benefit Programs or Agreements are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Parent Employee Benefit Plans").
(b) True, correct and complete copies of each of the Parent Plans and related trusts, if applicable, including all amendments thereto, have been delivered to the Company. There has also been delivered to the Company, with respect to each Parent Plan required to file such report and description, the report on Form 5500 for the past three years, to the extent applicable, and the most recent summary plan description and summaries of material modifications thereto. True, correct and complete copies or descriptions of all Parent Benefit Programs or Agreements have also been delivered to the Company.
(c) (i) None of Parent, any Parent ERISA Affiliate or any entity that, at any time during the past six years, was required to be treated as a single employer together with Parent or a Parent ERISA Affiliate pursuant to Section 414 of the Code contributes to or has an obligation to contribute to, nor has at any time contributed to or had an obligation to contribute to, a multiemployer plan within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA or any other plan subject to Title IV of ERISA; (ii) each of Parent and the Parent ERISA Affiliates has performed all obligations, whether arising by operation of law or by contract, including ERISA and the Code, required to be performed by it in connection with the Parent Employee Benefit Plans, and, to the knowledge of Parent, there have been no defaults or violations by any other party to the Parent Employee Benefit Plans; (iii) all reports, returns, notices, disclosures and other documents relating to the Parent Plans required to be filed with or furnished to governmental entities, plan participants or plan beneficiaries have been timely filed or furnished in accordance with applicable law, and each Parent Employee Benefit Plan has been administered in compliance with its governing written documents; (iv) each of the Parent Plans intended to be qualified under Section 401 of the Code satisfies the requirements of such Section and has received a current favorable determination letter from the IRS regarding such qualified status and has not been amended, operated or administered in a way which would adversely affect such qualified status; (v) there are no actions, suits or claims pending (other than routine claims for benefits) or, to the knowledge of Parent, contemplated or threatened against, or with respect to, any of the Parent Employee Benefit Plans or their assets; (vi) each trust maintained in connection with each Parent Plan, which is qualified under Section 401 of the Code, is tax exempt under Section 501 of the Code; (vii) all contributions required to be made to the Parent Employee Benefit Plans have been made timely; (viii) no accumulated funding deficiency, whether or not waived, within the meaning of Section 302 of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code has been incurred, and there has been no termination or partial termination of any Parent Plan within the meaning of Section 411(d)(3) of the Code; (ix) no act, omission or transaction has occurred which could result in imposition on Parent or any Parent ERISA Affiliate of (A) breach of fiduciary duty liability damages under Section 409 of ERISA, (B) a civil penalty assessed pursuant to subsections (c), (i) or (1) of Section 502 of ERISA or (C) a tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 43 of Subtitle D of the Code; (x) to the knowledge of Parent, there is no matter pending with respect to any of the Parent Plans before the IRS, the Department of Labor or the PBGC; (xi) each of the Parent Employee Benefit Plans complies, in form and operation, with the applicable provisions of the Code and ERISA; (xii) each Parent Employee Benefit Plan may be unilaterally amended or terminated in its entirety (otherwise than with respect to outstanding shares) without any liability or other obligation; (xiii) Parent and the Parent ERISA Affiliates have no liabilities or other obligations, whether actual or contingent, under any Parent Employee Benefit Plan for post-employment benefits of any nature (other than COBRA continuation coverage); and (xiv) neither Parent nor any of the Parent
A-42
ERISA Affiliates or any present or former director, officer, employee or other agent of Parent or any of the Parent ERISA Affiliates has made any written or oral representations or promises to any present or former director, officer, employee or other agent concerning his or her terms, conditions or benefits of employment, including the tenure of any such employment or the conditions under which such employment may be terminated by Parent, any of the Parent ERISA Affiliates or the Company which will be binding upon or enforceable against Parent or the Company after the Effective Time.
(d) No employee is currently on a leave of absence due to sickness or disability and no claim is pending or expected to be made by an employee, former employee or independent contractor for workers' compensation benefits.
(e) (i) With respect to the Parent Employee Benefit Plans, there exists no condition or set of circumstances in connection with any of the Parent Companies that could be expected to result in liability reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent under ERISA, the Code or any other applicable law; and (ii) with respect to the Parent Employee Benefit Plans, individually and in the aggregate, there are no unfunded benefit obligations which have not been accounted for by reserves, or otherwise properly footnoted in accordance with GAAP, on the financial statements of the Parent Companies, which obligations are reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
(f) Neither the execution or delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall result in any payment becoming due to any employee or group of employees of any of the Parent Companies.
(g) No amounts payable or that could become payable under any Parent Employee Benefit Plan as a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise shall fail to be deductible for Federal income tax purposes by virtue of either Section 280G or 162(m) of the Code.
Section 4.18 Employment Contracts and Benefits. Except as otherwise provided for in any Parent
Employee Benefit Plan: (a) none of the Parent Companies is subject to or obligated under any consulting,
employment, severance, retention, termination or similar arrangement, any employee benefit, incentive or deferred compensation plan with respect to any Person, or any bonus, profit sharing, pension,
stock option, stock purchase or similar plan or other arrangement or other fringe benefit plan entered into or maintained for the benefit of employees of any of the Parent Companies or any other
Person; and (b) no employee of any of the Parent Companies or any other Person owns, or has any right granted by any of the Parent Companies to acquire, any interest in any of the assets or
business of any of the Parent Companies.
(a) No employees of any of the Parent Companies are represented by any labor organization. No labor organization or group of employees of any of the Parent Companies has made a demand for recognition or certification as a union or other labor organization, and there are no representation or certification proceedings or petitions seeking a representation or certification proceeding presently pending or threatened in writing to be brought or filed with the National Labor Relations Board or any other labor relations tribunal or authority. There are no organizing activities involving any of the Parent Companies pending with any labor organization or group of employees of any of the Parent Companies.
(b) Each of the Parent Companies is in compliance with all laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to the employment of labor, including all such laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to wages, hours, collective bargaining, discrimination, civil rights, safety and health, workers' compensation and the collection and payment of income Tax withholding, Social Security
A-43
Taxes, Medicare Taxes and similar Taxes, except where the failure to comply would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
Section 4.20 Insurance. Each of the Parent Companies maintains, and through the Closing Date
will maintain, insurance with reputable insurers (or pursuant to prudent
self-insurance programs described in Section 4.20 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule) in such amounts and covering such risks as are in accordance with prudent industry practice for
companies engaged in businesses of a size and scope similar to those of the Parent Companies and owning properties in the same general area in which the Parent Companies conduct their businesses. None
of such insurance coverage was obtained through the use of false or misleading information or the failure to provide the insurer with all information requested in order to evaluate the liabilities and
risks insured. There is no material default with respect to any provision contained in any such policy or binder, and none of the Parent Companies has failed to give any notice or present any claim
under any such policy or binder in due and timely fashion. There are no billed but unpaid premiums past due under any such policy or binder. (a) There are no outstanding claims under any such
policies or binders and, to the knowledge of Parent, there has not occurred any event that might reasonably form the basis of any claim against or relating to any of the Parent Companies that is not
covered by any of such policies or binders; (b) no notice of cancellation or non-renewal of any such policies or binders has been received or threatened; and (c) there are no
performance bonds outstanding with respect to any of the Parent Companies.
Section 4.21 Intellectual Property. There is no intellectual or intangible property (including,
without limitation, legally enforceable licenses or other rights to use, any and all United States and
foreign patents, patent applications, patent disclosures, mask works, computer software, geophysical data, trademarks, trade dress, trade names, logos, Internet domain names, copyrights and service
marks, including applications to register and registrations for any of the foregoing, as well as trade secrets, know-how, data and other proprietary rights and information) that is
necessary for the operation, or continued operation, of the business of any of the Parent Companies, or for the ownership and operation, or continued ownership and operation, of any of their assets,
for which the Parent Companies do not hold valid and continuing authority in connection with the use thereof. The businesses of the Parent Companies, as presently conducted, do not conflict with,
infringe or violate any intellectual property rights of any other Person, and none of the Parent Companies has received any claim regarding such conflict, infringement or violation, except where (in
either case) any such conflict, infringement or violation could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
Section 4.22 Title to Assets. The Parent Companies (individually or collectively) have
Defensible Title to (i) the Oil and Gas Interests of the Parent Companies included or reflected in
the Parent Companies' Ownership Interests and (ii) all other assets of the Parent Companies (other than in the case of this item (ii) those assets for which the failure to have
Defensible Title would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in Material Adverse Effect on the Parent Companies, taken as a whole). Each Oil and Gas Interest included or reflected in the
Parent Companies' Ownership Interests entitles the Parent Companies (individually or collectively) to receive not less than the undivided interest set forth in (or derived from) Parent Companies'
Ownership Interests of all Hydrocarbons produced, saved and sold from or attributable to such Oil and Gas Interest, and the portion of the costs and expenses of operation and development of such Oil
and Gas Interest that is borne or to be borne by the Parent Companies (individually or collectively) is not greater than the undivided interest set forth in (or derived from) Parent Companies'
Ownership Interests. The oil and gas leases and other agreements that provide the Parent Companies with operating rights in the Oil and Gas Interests included or reflected in the Parent Companies'
Ownership Interests are legal, valid and binding and in full force and effect, and the rentals, royalties and other payments due thereunder have been properly and timely paid and there is no existing
default (or event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become
A-44
a default) under any of such oil and gas leases or other agreements, except in each case as have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
Section 4.23 Oil and Gas Operations.
(a) All wells included in the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent have been drilled and (if completed) completed, operated and produced in accordance with generally accepted oil and gas field practices and in compliance in all material respects with applicable oil and gas leases and applicable laws, rules and regulations, except where any failure or violation could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
(b) Proceeds from the sale of Hydrocarbons produced from Parent's Oil and Gas Interests are being received by the Parent Companies in a timely manner and are not being held in suspense for any reason (except in the ordinary course of business).
(c) None of the Parent Companies has received any material advance, take-or-pay or other similar payments that entitle purchasers of production to receive deliveries of Hydrocarbons without paying therefor, and, on a net, company-wide basis, the Parent Companies are neither underproduced nor overproduced, in either case, to any material extent, under gas balancing or similar arrangements.
(d) No claim, notice or order from any Governmental Authority or other Person has been received by any of the Parent Companies due to Hydrocarbon production in excess of allowables or similar violations that could result in curtailment of production after the Closing Date from any Oil and Gas Interests of the Parent Companies, except any such violations which individually or in the aggregate have not had, and would not be reasonably likely to have or result in, a Material Adverse Effect on the Parent Companies.
(e) All material operating equipment owned or leased by the Parent Companies is, in the aggregate, in a state of repair so as to be adequate in all material respects for reasonably prudent operations in the areas in which they are operated.
Section 4.24 Oil and Gas Reserves. The factual, non-interpretive data related to oil and gas
reserves reflected in the Parent Reserve Report was, as of the date of the Parent Reserve
Report, accurate in all material respects.
Section 4.25 Derivative Transactions and Hedging. Section 4.25 of the Parent Disclosure
Schedule contains a complete and correct list of all Derivative Transactions (including each outstanding Hydrocarbon
or financial hedging position attributable to the Hydrocarbon production of the Parent Companies) entered into by the Parent Companies or for the account of any of its customers as of the date of this
Agreement. All such Derivative Transactions were, and any Derivative Transactions entered into after the date of this Agreement will be, entered into in accordance with applicable laws, and in
accordance with the investment, securities, commodities, risk management and other policies, practices and procedures employed by the Parent Companies. The Parent Companies have duly performed in all
material respects all of their respective obligations under the Derivative Transactions to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued, and, to the knowledge of the Parent, there are no
material breaches, violations, collateral deficiencies, requests for collateral or demands for payment (except for ordinary course margin deposit requests), or defaults or allegations or assertions of
such by any party thereunder.
Section 4.26 Natural Gas Act. Any gas gathering system constituting a part of the properties of
the Parent Companies has as its primary function the provision of natural gas gathering
services, as the term "gathering" is interpreted under Section 1(b) of the NGA; none of the properties has been or is certificated by the FERC under
Section 7(c) of the NGA or to the knowledge of Parent are now
A-45
subject to FERC jurisdiction under the NGA; and none of the properties has been or is providing service pursuant to Section 311 of the NGA.
Section 4.27 Environmental Matters.
(a) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, none of the Parent Companies is subject to any liability or obligation (accrued, contingent, or otherwise) to investigate, cleanup, correct, abate, or take any response, remedial or corrective action under Environmental Laws relating to (i) environmental conditions on, under, or about any of the properties or assets owned, leased, operated, or used by the Parent Companies or any predecessor at the present time or in the past, or (ii) the past or present use, management, handling, transport, treatment, generation, storage, disposal, or release of any Hazardous Materials, whether on-site or off-site.
(b) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, all permits, notices, approvals and authorizations required to be obtained or filed in connection with the operation of the Parent Companies' business or the operation or use of any property owned, leased, or operated by the Parent Companies have been obtained or filed and are currently in effect, and the Parent Companies are in compliance with the terms and conditions of such permits, notices, approvals and authorizations.
(c) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, each of the Parent Companies has conducted its business and operated its assets, and is conducting its business and operating its assets, in compliance with all Environmental Laws;
(d) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, none of the Parent Companies has been notified by any Governmental Authority or other Person or is otherwise aware that any of the current or prior operations or assets of any of the Parent Companies is the subject of any investigation or inquiry by any Governmental Authority or other Person under Environmental Laws;
(e) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, none of the Parent Companies and, to the knowledge of Parent, no other Person has filed any notice under any federal, state or local law indicating that (i) any of the Parent Companies is responsible for release or threatened release into the environment, or the improper handling, generation, treatment, storage, disposal or recycling, of any Hazardous Material, on any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Parent Companies; or (ii) any Hazardous Material is improperly handled, generated, treated, stored, disposed of, or recycled upon any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Parent Companies;
(f) None of the Parent Companies has any liability in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate in connection with (i) the release or threatened release into the environment at, beneath or on any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Parent Companies, (ii) any obligations under or violations of Environmental Laws, or (iii) the use, release, treatment, storage, disposal, or recycling of any Hazardous Material;
(g) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Parent, there are no pending, or to the knowledge of Parent threatened claims, complaints, notices, inquiries or requests for information involving any matter which remains unresolved (i) under Environmental Laws against any person whose liability for environmental matters any Parent Company has retained or assumed either contractually or by operation of law, or (ii) with respect to any alleged violation of any Environmental Law or regarding potential liability under any Environmental Law against any Parent Company relating to operations or conditions of any facilities or property (including off-site treatment, storage, disposal, or recycling of any Hazardous Material from such
A-46
facilities or property) currently or formerly owned, leased or operated by any of the Parent Companies;
(h) No property now or previously owned, leased or operated by any of the Parent Companies is listed on the National Priorities List pursuant to CERCLA or on the CERCLIS or on any other similar federal or state list as sites requiring investigation or cleanup;
(i) To the knowledge of Parent, none of the Parent Companies is transporting, has transported, or is arranging or has arranged for the transportation of any Hazardous Material to any location which is listed on the National Priorities List pursuant to CERCLA, on the CERCLIS, or on any similar federal or state list or which is the subject of federal, state or local enforcement actions or other investigations that may lead to claims in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate against any of the Parent Companies for investigation, removal or remedial work, contribution for removal or remedial work, damage to natural resources or personal injury, including claims under CERCLA;
(j) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, none of the Parent Companies owns or operates any underground storage tanks or solid waste storage, treatment and/or disposal facilities;
(k) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, to the knowledge of Parent, no asbestos, asbestos containing materials or polychlorinated biphenyls are present on or at any property or facility owned, leased or operated by any of the Parent Companies;
(l) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, none of the Parent Companies is operating, or required to be operating, any of its properties or facilities under any order, compliance or consent order, injunction, decree or agreement issued or entered into under, or pertaining to matters regulated by, any Environmental Law;
(m) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, none of the Parent Companies has assumed contractually, or to the knowledge of Parent, by operation of law, any liabilities or obligations of third parties under Environmental Laws;
(n) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, Parent is not aware of any environmental conditions or circumstances that form, or are reasonably likely to give rise to, a claim against any Parent Company or any Person whose liability for such claim any Parent Company has retained or assumed contractually or by operation of law.
(o) Except as would not result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, no Parent Company is subject to any environmental indemnification obligation regarding businesses currently or formerly owned or operated by a Parent Company or regarding properties currently or formerly owned, leased or operated by a Parent Company.
(p) No Parent Company is required by virtue of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to perform an environmental site assessment or to remove or remediate any Hazardous Materials.
(q) Parent has provided or made available to the Company copies of all contracts in which a Parent Company has retained, assumed, or provided indemnification for liabilities for environmental matters and all material environmental permits, notices, approvals, authorizations, claims, complaints, inquiries, requests for information, orders, compliance or consent orders, injunctions, decrees, agreements, reports, data, studies, results of investigations, audits, assessments, evaluations and correspondence in the possession, custody or control of any of the Parent Companies.
A-47
Section 4.28 Books and Records. All books, records and files of the Parent Companies (including
those pertaining to Parent's Oil and Gas Interests, wells and other assets, those pertaining to
the production, gathering, transportation and sale of Hydrocarbons, and corporate, accounting, financial and employee records): (a) have been prepared, assembled and maintained in accordance
with usual and customary policies and procedures, and (b) fairly and accurately reflect the ownership, use, enjoyment and operation by the Parent Companies of their respective assets.
Section 4.29 Funding. Parent has available adequate funds in an aggregate amount sufficient to
pay (a) all amounts required to be paid to the stockholders of the Company upon
consummation of the Merger, (b) all amounts required to be paid by Parent in respect of all Company Stock Options and Company Warrants upon exercise thereof, and (c) all expenses
incurred by Parent and Merger Sub in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 4.30 Brokers. No broker, finder, investment banker or other Person is or will be, in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, entitled to any brokerage,
finder's or other fee or compensation based on any arrangement or agreement made by or on behalf of any of the Parent Companies or Merger Sub and for which Parent, Merger Sub or any of the Target
Companies shall have any obligation or liability.
Section 4.31 Vote Required. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of votes cast at a
meeting at which a majority of the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock are present and
voting is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of Parent capital stock or other voting securities necessary to approve this Agreement, the Merger (including the issuance of the Parent
Common Stock) and the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 4.32 Rights Agreement. Parent has taken all necessary action (including, if required,
amending the Parent Rights Agreement) so that the entering into of this Agreement, the acquisition
of shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not enable or require the Parent Rights to be exercised or
distributed.
Section 4.33 State Takeover Laws. Parent has taken all necessary action to exempt the Merger
from any applicable moratorium, fair price, business combination, control share and other
anti-takeover laws under the NRS.
Section 4.34 Affiliate Transactions. Section 4.34 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule
contains a complete and correct list, as of the date of this Agreement, of all agreements, contracts,
transfers of assets or liabilities or other commitments or transactions, whether or not entered into in the ordinary course of business, to or by which Parent or any of its subsidiaries, on the one
hand, and any of their respective Affiliates (other than Parent or any of its direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries) on the other hand, are or have been a party or otherwise bound or affected,
and that (a) are currently pending, in effect or have been in effect during the past 12 months, (b) involve continuing liabilities and obligations that, individually or in the
aggregate, have been, are or will be material to the Parent Companies, taken as a whole and (c) are not Parent Plans.
Section 4.35 Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Since January 1, 2003, Parent and each of
its subsidiaries has had in place "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in
Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Exchange Act) designed and maintained to ensure in all material respects that (a) transactions are executed in accordance
with management's general or specific authorizations, (b) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain
accountability for assets, (c) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's general or specific authorization, (d) the recorded accountability for assets is
compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences, (e) all information (both financial and non-financial)
required to be
A-48
disclosed by Parent in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and (f) all such information is accumulated and communicated to Parent's management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Parent required under the Exchange Act with respect to such reports. Parent's disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed by Parent in the reports filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Neither Parent nor its independent auditors have identified any "significant deficiencies" or "material weaknesses" in Parent's or any of its subsidiaries' internal controls as contemplated under Section 404 of SOX. Parent has diligently completed in all material respects its work plan relating to documentation, testing and evaluation of Parent's internal control over financial reporting for purposes of providing the report required by Section 404 of SOX and related SEC rules. As of the date of this Agreement, to the knowledge of Parent, (i) there is no reason that it will not be able, on a timely basis, to complete and include in the Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, management's assessment of Parent's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of SOX and (ii) there is no material weakness or significant deficiency, in each case as such term is defined in PCAOB Auditing Std. No. 2.
Section 4.36 Opinion of Financial Advisor. Parent has received an opinion of Lehman Brothers to
the effect that, as of the date of this Agreement, the Conversion Number is fair, from a financial point of
view, to Parent, a signed copy of which has been delivered to the Company. Parent has received the approval of such financial advisor to permit the inclusion of a copy of its written opinion in its
entirety in the Proxy Statement, subject to such advisor's review thereof as presented in the Proxy Statement.
Section 5.1 Conduct of Business by Parent Pending Closing. Parent covenants and agrees with the
Company that, from the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this Agreement is
earlier terminated pursuant to Section 7.1, each of the Parent Companies shall conduct its business only in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practices, except as specifically
contemplated in this Agreement or required by applicable law, from the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this Agreement is earlier terminated pursuant to
Section 7.1. Without the prior written consent of the Company:
(a) None of the Parent Companies shall: (i) amend its certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational documents; (ii) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any of its outstanding capital stock; (iii) declare, set aside or pay any dividends or other distributions (whether payable in cash, property or securities) with respect to its capital stock; (iv) issue, sell or agree to issue or sell or amend any phantom stock or stock appreciation rights or any securities or other equity interests, including its capital stock, any rights, options or warrants to acquire its capital stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for its capital stock (other than shares of Parent Common Stock issued pursuant to the exercise of any Parent Stock Option outstanding on the date of this Agreement); (v) reduce the exercise or conversion price or extend the time for exercise or conversion, other than in accordance with mandatory contractual provisions, of any rights, options or warrants to acquire its capital stock or securities; (vi) purchase, cancel, retire, redeem or otherwise acquire any of its outstanding capital stock or other securities or other equity interests, except pursuant to the terms of the Parent Employee Benefit Plans in effect as of the date of this Agreement; (vii) merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or
A-49
substantially all of its assets to, any other Person (other than the Merger); (viii) liquidate, wind-up or dissolve (or suffer any liquidation or dissolution); or (ix) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing.
(b) None of the Parent Companies shall (i) acquire any corporation, partnership or other business entity or any interest therein (other than interests in joint ventures, joint operation or ownership arrangements or tax partnerships acquired in the ordinary course of business) having an acquisition price in excess of $10,000,000; (ii) sell, lease or sublease, transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any Oil and Gas Interests of Parent that have a value in excess of $5,000,000, individually, or any other assets that have a value at the time of such sale, lease, sublease, transfer or disposition in excess of $5,000,000, individually (except that this clause shall not apply to the sale of Hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business or encumbrances under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement); (iii) farm-out any Oil and Gas Interest of Parent having a value in excess of $2,000,000 or interest therein; (iv) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any securities of any other Person (including any capital stock or other securities or equity interest in any Parent Subsidiary); (v) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any Person (other than loans or advances in the ordinary course of business) in an aggregate amount in excess of $500,000; (vi) enter into any Parent Material Agreement or any other agreement not terminable by any of the Parent Companies upon notice of 30 days or less and without penalty or other obligation; or (vii) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing.
(c) None of the Parent Companies shall (i) permit to be outstanding at any time under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of $50,000,000; (ii) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money other than under trade credit vendor lines not exceeding $1,000,000 in the aggregate or under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement; (iii) incur any other obligation or liability (other than liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business); (iv) assume, endorse (other than endorsements of negotiable instruments in the ordinary course of business), guarantee or otherwise become liable or responsible (whether directly, contingently or otherwise) for the liabilities or obligations of any other Person (other than Parent guarantees of Cimarex Energy Services, Inc. regarding obligations under transportation agreements) in an amount in excess of $500,000; (v) enter into, amend or modify any Derivative Transactions; or (vi) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing.
(d) The Parent Companies shall operate, maintain and otherwise deal with the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent in accordance with good and prudent oil and gas field practices and in accordance with all applicable oil and gas leases and other contracts and agreements and all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to Environmental Laws.
(e) None of the Parent Companies shall voluntarily resign, transfer or otherwise relinquish any right it has as of the date of this Agreement, (i) as operator of any Oil and Gas Interest of Parent, except as required by law, regulation or contract, except to the extent such action would not be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent, or (ii) with respect to any standstill agreement.
(f) None of the Parent Companies shall (i) enter into, or otherwise become liable or obligated under or pursuant to: (1) any employee benefit, pension or other plan (whether or not subject to ERISA), (2) any other stock option, stock purchase, incentive or deferred compensation plan or arrangement or other fringe benefit plan, or (3) any consulting, employment, severance, retention, termination or similar agreement with any Person, or amend or extend any such plan, arrangement or agreement; (ii) except for payments made pursuant to any Parent Employee
A-50
Benefit Plan or any other plan, agreement or arrangement described in Section 4.17 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, grant, or otherwise become liable for or obligated to pay, any severance, retention or termination payment, bonus or increase in compensation or benefits (other than payments, bonuses or increases that are mandated by the terms of agreements existing as of the date hereof or that are paid in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, and not individually or in the aggregate material in amount) to, or forgive any indebtedness of, any employee or consultant of any of the Parent Companies; or (iii) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement to do any of the foregoing.
(g) None of the Parent Companies shall create, incur, assume or permit to exist any Lien on any of its assets, except for Permitted Encumbrances
(h) The Parent Companies shall (i) keep and maintain accurate books, records and accounts; (ii) maintain in full force and effect the policies or binders of insurance described in Section 4.20; (iii) pay all Taxes, assessments and other governmental charges imposed upon any of their assets or with respect to their franchises, business, income or assets before any penalty or interest accrues thereon; (iv) pay all material claims (including claims for labor, services, materials and supplies) that have become due and payable and which by law have or may become a Lien upon any of their assets prior to the time when any penalty or fine shall be incurred with respect thereto or any such Lien shall be imposed thereon; and (v) comply in all material respects with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority, obtain or take all Governmental Actions necessary in the operation of their businesses, and comply with and enforce the provisions of all Parent Material Agreements, including paying when due all rentals, royalties, expenses and other liabilities relating to their businesses or assets; provided, however, that Parent shall not be in violation of this Section 5.1(h) if any of the Parent Companies incurs obligations for penalties and interest in connection with gross production tax reporting or other Taxes in the ordinary course of business; and provided further, that the Parent Companies may contest the imposition of any such Taxes, assessments and other governmental charges, any such claim, or the requirements of any applicable law, rule, regulation or order or any Parent Material Agreement if done so in good faith by appropriate proceedings and if adequate reserves are established in accordance with GAAP.
(i) The Parent Companies shall at all times preserve and keep in full force and effect their corporate existence and rights and franchises material to their performance under this Agreement.
(j) None of the Parent Companies shall:
(i) take any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in ARTICLE IV, except as specifically permitted under other provisions of this Section 5.1(j);
(ii) approve or implement budgets for general and administrative expenses of the Parent Companies (including salary, bonuses, general operating and overhead expenses) or budgets for Capital Expenditures of the Parent Companies, or incur expenses or disburse funds for any of such purposes except pursuant to the budgets which have been approved by the Company or revisions to such budgets which are approved by the Company, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld (any budgets which have been or are approved as required herein are referred to as "Approved Budgets");
(iii) except to the extent already included in an Approved Budget, enter into any agreements or other arrangements with respect to, or make any payments, incur any expenses or disburse any funds for (1) any Capital Project, the completion or full capitalization of which can reasonably be expected to require the Parent Companies to expend, in the aggregate, in excess of $5,000,000, or (2) any Capital Project for the exploration of Oil and Gas Interests
A-51
with undeveloped reserves (including the acquisition of leasehold interests and seismic data, the drilling of wells and all related costs and expenses) which can reasonably be expected to require the Parent Companies to expend, in the aggregate, in excess of $5,000,000;
(iv) make any Capital Expenditure or general and administrative expense payment which exceeds, for any project, by more than 10 percent the amount set forth in the appropriate line item for such expenditure in an Approved Budget; or
(v) knowingly take, or agree to commit to take any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the failure of a condition set forth in Section 6.1 and Section 6.3(a) and (b) at, or as of any time prior to, the Effective Time, or that would impair materially the ability of the Company, Parent, Merger Sub or the holders of shares of Company Common Stock to consummate the Merger in accordance with the terms hereof or delay materially such consummation.
Section 5.2 Conduct of Business by the Company Pending Closing. The Company covenants and agrees
with Parent and Merger Sub that, from the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this
Agreement is earlier terminated pursuant to Section 7.1, each of the Target Companies shall conduct its business only in the ordinary and usual course and consistent with past practices, except
as specifically contemplated in this Agreement or required by applicable law, from the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this Agreement is earlier
terminated pursuant to Section 7.1. Without the prior written consent of Parent:
(a) None of the Target Companies shall: (i) amend its certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational documents; (ii) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any of its outstanding capital stock; (iii) declare, set aside or pay any dividends or other distributions (whether payable in cash, property or securities) with respect to its capital stock (except as contemplated by Section 5.24 for the TEL Distribution); (iv) issue, sell or agree to issue or sell or amend any phantom stock or stock appreciation rights or any securities or other equity interests, including its capital stock, any rights, options or warrants to acquire its capital stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for its capital stock (other than shares of Company Common Stock issued pursuant to the exercise of any Company Warrant outstanding on the date of this Agreement, pursuant to the exercise of any Company Stock Options outstanding on the date of this Agreement, or relating to the conversion of the 1996 Preferred in accordance with Section 5.26); (v) reduce the exercise or conversion price or extend the time for exercise or conversion, other than in accordance with mandatory contractual provisions, of any rights, options or warrants to acquire its capital stock or securities; (vi) purchase, cancel, retire, redeem or otherwise acquire any of its outstanding capital stock or other securities or other equity interests, except pursuant to the terms of the Company Employee Benefit Plans in effect as of the date of this Agreement or as relates to the cancellation of the Company Stock Options in accordance with Section 2.4(c)(iii); (vii) merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or substantially all of its assets to, any other Person (other than the Merger); (viii) liquidate, wind-up or dissolve (or suffer any liquidation or dissolution); or (ix) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing.
(b) None of the Target Companies shall (i) acquire any corporation, partnership or other business entity or any interest therein (other than interests in joint ventures, joint operation or ownership arrangements or tax partnerships acquired in the ordinary course of business) having an acquisition price in excess of $2,000,000; (ii) sell, lease or sublease, transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any Oil and Gas Interests of the Company that have a value in excess of $1,000,000, individually, or any other assets that have a value at the time of such sale, lease, sublease, transfer or disposition in excess of $1,000,000, individually (except that this clause shall not apply to the sale of Hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business or
A-52
encumbrances under the Company Bank Credit Agreement); (iii) farm-out any Oil and Gas Interest of the Company having a value in excess of $2,000,000 or interest therein; (iv) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of or mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any securities of any other Person (including any capital stock or other securities or equity interest in any Company Subsidiary); (v) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any Person (other than loans or advances in the ordinary course of business) in an aggregate amount in excess of $500,000; (vi) enter into any Company Material Agreement or any other agreement not terminable by any of the Target Companies upon notice of 30 days or less and without penalty or other obligation; or (vii) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing.
(c) None of the Target Companies shall (i) permit to be outstanding at any time under the Company Bank Credit Agreement indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of $400,000,000, exclusive of any indebtedness incurred to fund costs relating to the transactions contemplated under this Agreement; (ii) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money other than under trade credit vendor lines not exceeding $1,000,000 in the aggregate or under the Company Bank Credit Agreement or as relates to the cash payment for the cancellation of the Company Stock Options in accordance with Section 2.4(c)(iii); (iii) incur any other obligation or liability (other than liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business); (iv) assume, endorse (other than endorsements of negotiable instruments in the ordinary course of business), guarantee or otherwise become liable or responsible (whether directly, contingently or otherwise) for the liabilities or obligations of any other Person in an amount in excess of $500,000; (v) enter into, amend or modify any Derivative Transactions; or (vi) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing. None of the Target Companies shall incur any obligation or liability (through notes or any other instrument or form of obligation) under the Continuing Guaranty by the Company to Compass Bank, dated December 20, 2004, with respect to indebtedness of Metrix Networks, Inc., that exceeds $500,000.
(d) The Target Companies shall operate, maintain and otherwise deal with the Oil and Gas Interests of the Company in accordance with good and prudent oil and gas field practices and in accordance with all applicable oil and gas leases and other contracts and agreements and all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to Environmental Laws.
(e) None of the Target Companies shall voluntarily resign, transfer or otherwise relinquish any right it has as of the date of this Agreement, (i) as operator of any Oil and Gas Interest of the Company, except as required by law, regulation or contract, except to the extent such action would not be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company, or (ii) with respect to any standstill agreement.
(f) None of the Target Companies shall (i) enter into, or otherwise become liable or obligated under or pursuant to: (1) any employee benefit, pension or other plan (whether or not subject to ERISA), (2) any other stock option, stock purchase, incentive or deferred compensation plan or arrangement or other fringe benefit plan, or (3) any consulting, employment, severance, retention, termination or similar agreement with any Person, or amend or extend any such plan, arrangement or agreement; (ii) except for payments made pursuant to any Company Employee Benefit Plan or any other plan, agreement or arrangement described in Section 3.16 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, grant, or otherwise become liable for or obligated to pay, any severance, retention or termination payment, bonus or increase in compensation or benefits (other than payments, bonuses or increases that are mandated by the terms of agreements existing as of the date hereof or that are paid in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, and not individually or in the aggregate material in amount) to, or forgive any indebtedness of, any employee or consultant of any of the Target Companies; or (iii) enter into any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement to do any of the foregoing.
A-53
(g) None of the Target Companies shall create, incur, assume or permit to exist any Lien on any of its assets, except for Permitted Encumbrances.
(h) The Target Companies shall (i) keep and maintain accurate books, records and accounts; (ii) maintain in full force and effect the policies or binders of insurance described in Section 3.19; (iii) pay all Taxes, assessments and other governmental charges imposed upon any of their assets or with respect to their franchises, business, income or assets before any penalty or interest accrues thereon; (iv) pay all material claims (including claims for labor, services, materials and supplies) that have become due and payable and which by law have or may become a Lien upon any of their assets prior to the time when any penalty or fine shall be incurred with respect thereto or any such Lien shall be imposed thereon; and (v) comply in all material respects with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority, obtain or take all Governmental Actions necessary in the operation of their businesses, and comply with and enforce the provisions of all Company Material Agreements, including paying when due all rentals, royalties, expenses and other liabilities relating to their businesses or assets; provided, however, that the Company shall not be in violation of this Section 5.2(h) if any of the Target Companies incurs obligations for penalties and interest in connection with gross production tax reporting or other Taxes in the ordinary course of business; and provided further, that the Target Companies may contest the imposition of any such Taxes, assessments and other governmental charges, any such claim, or the requirements of any applicable law, rule, regulation or order or any Company Material Agreement if done so in good faith by appropriate proceedings and if adequate reserves are established in accordance with GAAP.
(i) The Target Companies shall at all times preserve and keep in full force and effect their corporate existence and rights and franchises material to their performance under this Agreement.
(j) None of the Target Companies shall:
(i) take any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in ARTICLE III, except as specifically permitted under other provisions of this Section 5.2(j);
(ii) approve or implement budgets for general and administrative expenses of the Target Companies (including salary, bonuses, general operating and overhead expenses) or budgets for Capital Expenditures of the Target Companies, or incur expenses or disburse funds for any of such purposes except pursuant to the budgets which have been approved by Parent or revisions to such budgets which are approved by Parent, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld (any budgets which have been or are approved as required herein are referred to as "Approved Budgets");
(iii) except to the extent already included in an Approved Budget, enter into any agreements or other arrangements with respect to, or make any payments, incur any expenses or disburse any funds for (1) any onshore Capital Project, the completion or full capitalization of which can reasonably be expected to require the Target Companies to expend, in the aggregate, in excess of $2,000,000, or (2) any Capital Project for the onshore exploration of Oil and Gas Interests with undeveloped reserves (including the acquisition of onshore leasehold interests and seismic data, the drilling of onshore wells and all related costs and expenses) which can reasonably be expected to require the Target Companies to expend, in the aggregate, in excess of $2,000,000;
A-54
(iv) except to the extent already included in an Approved Budget, enter into any agreements or other arrangements requiring payment in any single case or series of related cases exceeding $1,000,000 with respect to, or make any payments, incur any expenses or disburse any funds (in any single case or series of related cases exceeding $1,000,000) for (1) any offshore Capital Project or (2) any Capital Project for the offshore exploration of Oil and Gas Interests with undeveloped reserves (including the acquisition of offshore leasehold interests and seismic data, the drilling of offshore wells and all related costs and expenses);
(v) make any Capital Expenditure or general and administrative expense payment which, for any project, exceeds by more than 10 percent the amount set forth in the appropriate line item for such expenditure in an Approved Budget; or
(vi) knowingly take, or agree to commit to take, any action that would reasonably be expected to result in the failure of a conditions set forth in Section 6.1 and Section 6.2(a) and (b) at, or as of any time prior to, the Effective Time, or that would impair materially the ability of the Company, Parent, Merger Sub or the holders of shares of Company Common Stock to consummate the Merger in accordance with the terms hereof or delay materially such consummation.
Section 5.3 Access to Assets, Personnel and Information.
(a) Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of information, from the date hereof until the Effective Time, Parent shall: (i) afford to the Company and the Company Representatives, at the Company's sole expense, reasonable access to any of the assets, books and records, contracts, employees, representatives, agents and facilities of the Parent Companies; and (ii) upon request, furnish promptly to the Company (at the Company's expense) access to, or a copy of, any file, book, record, contract, permit, correspondence, or other written information, document or data concerning any of the Parent Companies (or any of their respective assets) that is within the possession or control of any of the Parent Companies.
(b) Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of information, from the date hereof until the Effective Time, the Company shall: (i) afford to Parent and the Parent Representatives, at Parent's sole expense, reasonable access to any of the assets, books and records, contracts, employees, representatives, agents and facilities of the Target Companies; and (ii) upon request, furnish promptly to Parent (at Parent's expense) access to, or a copy of, any file, book, record, contract, permit, correspondence, or other written information, document or data concerning any of the Target Companies (or any of their respective assets) that is within the possession or control of any of the Target Companies.
(c) The Company and the Company Representatives shall, at the Company's sole expense, have the right to make an environmental and physical assessment of the assets of the Parent Companies and, in connection therewith, shall have the right (during normal business hours, or as otherwise permitted by Parent) to enter and inspect such assets and all buildings and improvements thereon, and generally conduct such non-invasive tests, examinations, investigations and studies as the Company reasonably deems necessary, desirable or appropriate for the preparation of engineering or other reports relating to such assets, their condition and the presence of Hazardous Materials and compliance with Environmental Laws. Parent shall be provided not less than 24 hours prior notice of such activities, and Parent Representatives shall have the right to witness all such tests and investigations. The Company shall (and shall cause the Company Representatives to) keep any data or information acquired by any such examinations and the results of any analyses of such data and information strictly confidential and shall not (and shall cause the Company Representatives not to) disclose any of such data, information or results to any Person unless otherwise required by law or regulation and then only after written notice to Parent of the determination of the need for disclosure. The Company shall provide Parent a copy
A-55
of any environmental report or assessment prepared on behalf of the Company with respect to any of the Parent Companies or any of their properties or assets. The Company shall indemnify, defend and hold the Parent Companies and the Parent Representatives harmless from and against any and all claims to the extent arising out of or as a result of the activities of the Company and the Company Representatives on the assets of the Parent Companies in connection with conducting such environmental and physical assessment, except to the extent of and limited by the negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Parent Companies or any Parent Representative.
(d) Parent and the Parent Representatives shall, at Parent's sole expense, have the right to make an environmental and physical assessment of the assets of the Target Companies and, in connection therewith, shall have the right (during normal business hours, or as otherwise permitted by the Company) to enter and inspect such assets and all buildings and improvements thereon, and generally conduct such non-invasive tests, examinations, investigations and studies as Parent reasonably deems necessary, desirable or appropriate for the preparation of engineering or other reports relating to such assets, their condition and the presence of Hazardous Materials and compliance with Environmental Laws. The Company shall be provided not less than 24 hours prior notice of such activities, and Company Representatives shall have the right to witness all such tests and investigations. Parent shall (and shall cause the Parent Representatives to) keep any data or information acquired by any such examinations and the results of any analyses of such data and information strictly confidential and shall not (and shall cause the Parent Representatives not to) disclose any of such data, information or results to any Person unless otherwise required by law or regulation and then only after written notice to the Company of the determination of the need for disclosure. Parent shall provide the Company a copy of any environmental report or assessment prepared on behalf of Parent with respect to any of the Target Companies or any of their properties or assets. Parent shall indemnify, defend and hold the Target Companies and the Company Representatives harmless from and against any and all claims to the extent arising out of or as a result of the activities of Parent and the Parent Representatives on the assets of the Target Companies in connection with conducting such environmental and physical assessment, except to the extent of and limited by the negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Target Companies or any Company Representative.
(e) From the date hereof until the Effective Time, each of Parent and the Company shall: (i) furnish to the other, promptly upon receipt, filing or other submission (as the case may be), a copy of each communication between such Party and the SEC after the date hereof relating to the Merger, the Registration Statement or otherwise and each report, schedule, registration statement or other document filed by such Party with the SEC after the date hereof relating to the Merger, the Registration Statement or otherwise; and (ii) promptly advise the other of the substance of any oral communications between such Party and the SEC relating to the Merger, the Registration Statement or otherwise.
(f) The Company shall not (and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries and the Company Representatives not to), and Parent shall not (and shall cause the Parent Subsidiaries and the Parent Representatives not to), use any information obtained pursuant to this Section 5.3 for any purpose unrelated to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(g) Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.3 to the contrary: (i) the Company shall not be obligated under the terms of this Section 5.3 to disclose to Parent or the Parent Representatives, or grant Parent or the Parent Representatives access to, information that is within the possession or control of any of the Target Companies but subject to a valid and binding confidentiality agreement with a third party without first obtaining the consent of such third party, provided, that the Company shall use its reasonable efforts to obtain any such consent, and, provided further, that the Company shall make appropriate substitute disclosure arrangements in circumstances in which such consent is not obtained promptly; and (ii) Parent shall not be obligated under the
A-56
terms of this Section 5.3 to disclose to the Company or the Company Representatives, or grant the Company or the Company Representatives access to, information that is within the possession or control of any of the Parent Companies but subject to a valid and binding confidentiality agreement with a third party without first obtaining the consent of such third party, provided, that Parent shall use its reasonable efforts to obtain any such consent and, provided further, that the Parent shall make appropriate substitute disclosure arrangements in circumstances in which such consent is not obtained promptly.
(h) To facilitate approvals of activities of the Parties that are restricted under Section 5.1 and Section 5.2, Parent Representatives and Company Representatives agree to meet on a regular basis to review matters relating to their respective Capital Projects (including the status of expenditures under Approved Budgets (such as outstanding authorizations for expenditures), the success of their Capital Projects to date, proposals to initiate new Capital Projects or substantially increase commitments to existing Capital Projects), commodity hedging issues and any other matters restricted under Section 5.1 and Section 5.2.
(a) From the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or, if earlier, the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, the Company shall not, shall cause each of the Target Companies to not, shall cause each officer, director or employee of the Company or any of the Target Companies to not, and shall cause each investment banker, attorney or other advisor or representative of the Company or any of the Target Companies to not (with respect to any of the Target Companies),
(i) solicit, initiate, or knowingly encourage the submission of, any Takeover Proposal (as herein defined),
(ii) approve or recommend any Takeover Proposal, enter into any agreement, agreement-in-principle or letter of intent with respect to or accept any Takeover Proposal (or resolve to or publicly propose to do any of the foregoing), or
(iii) participate or engage in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any Person any information with respect to, or knowingly take any action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Takeover Proposal;
provided, however, that (x) if (under circumstances in which the Company has complied with all of its obligations under this Section 5.4(a)), prior to this Agreement having been approved by the Required Company Stockholder Vote (as herein defined), the Company receives an unsolicited written Takeover Proposal from a third party that the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith (after consulting with its financial advisors) is, or is reasonably likely to result in, a Superior Proposal (as herein defined), the Company and its representatives may conduct such additional discussions and provide such information as the Board of Directors of the Company shall determine, but only if, prior to such provision of such information or conduct of such additional discussions (A) such third party shall have entered into a confidentiality agreement in customary form that is no less favorable to the Company than the Confidentiality Agreement (and containing additional provisions that expressly permit the Company to comply with the provisions of this Section 5.4) and (B) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in its good faith judgment, after receiving the advice of outside legal counsel, that such action is required in order for the Board of Directors of the Company to comply with its fiduciary duties under applicable law; (y) at any time prior to this Agreement having been approved by the Required Company Stockholder Vote, and subject to the Company's compliance with its obligations under this Section 5.4(a), the Company's Board of Directors may (1) withdraw (or
A-57
amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent or Merger Sub), or publicly propose to withdraw (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent or Merger Sub), the recommendation or declaration of advisability by the Company's Board of Directors of this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and recommend, or publicly propose to recommend, any Takeover Proposal, or (2) recommend, adopt or approve or publicly propose to recommend, adopt or approve any Takeover Proposal, and/or (3) in compliance with Section 7.3, allow the Company to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a Superior Proposal, in the case of subclauses (1), (2) and (3) of this clause (y) only after (A) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith (after providing Parent and Merger Sub with three business days to propose a Parent Alternative Transaction (as defined herein) and after consulting with its financial advisors) that such Takeover Proposal is a Superior Proposal and (B) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in its good faith judgment, after receiving the advice of outside legal counsel, that such action is required in order for the Board of Directors of the Company to comply with its fiduciary duties under applicable law; and (z) nothing contained in subclauses (i) or (ii) above shall prohibit the Company or its Board of Directors from disclosing to the Company's stockholders a position with respect to any tender or exchange offer by a third party pursuant to Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act, in either case to the extent required by applicable law, provided that the Board of Directors of the Company shall not recommend that the stockholders of the Company tender their Company Common Stock in connection with any such tender or exchange offer unless the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith (after receiving the advice of its financial adviser and after providing Parent and Merger Sub with three business days to propose an alternative transaction, which alternative transaction may be conditioned upon receipt of further evidence of the ability and intent of the other prospective purchaser to close (a "Parent Alternative Transaction")) that such Takeover Proposal is a Superior Proposal. The Company shall immediately cease and cause to be terminated and shall cause its affiliates and the Target Companies and its or their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives or agents, to terminate all existing discussions or negotiations, if any, with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Takeover Proposal and shall communicate with any such parties (and their agents or advisors) in possession of confidential information regarding any of the Target Companies directing them to return or destroy such information. The Company shall ensure that its officers, directors and key employees and its investment bankers, attorneys and other representatives are aware of and comply with the provisions of this Section.
(b) For purposes of this Agreement, (i) "Takeover Proposal" shall mean any inquiry, proposal or offer from any Person (other than Parent, Merger Sub or any of their affiliates) relating to any acquisition, merger, consolidation, reorganization, share exchange, recapitalization, liquidation, direct or indirect business combination, asset acquisition or other similar transaction involving any of the Target Companies of (A) assets or businesses that constitute or represent 10% or more of the total revenue, operating income, EBITDA or assets of the Target Companies, taken as a whole, or (B) 10% or more of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock or any other Company capital stock (or other equity or voting interests in the Company) or capital stock of, or other equity or voting interests in, any of the Target Companies directly or indirectly holding, individually or taken together, the assets or business referred to in clause (A) above, in each case other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (ii) the term "Superior Proposal" means any bona fide, fully financed written Takeover Proposal to effect a merger, consolidation, reorganization, share exchange, recapitalization, liquidation, direct or indirect business combination, or other similar transaction made by a third party to acquire, directly or indirectly, (x) 50% or more of the assets of the Target Companies, taken as a whole or (y) 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, in any such case on terms that the Board of Directors of the Company determines in its good faith judgment (after consulting with its financial
A-58
advisors and outside counsel), taking into account all financial, legal and regulatory terms and conditions of the Takeover Proposal and this Agreement, including any changes to the terms of this Agreement offered by Parent through a Parent Alternative Transaction in response to such Takeover Proposal, including any conditions to such Takeover Proposal, the timing of the closing thereof, the risk of nonconsummation, the ability of the Person making the Takeover Proposal to finance the transaction contemplated thereby, any required governmental or other consents, filings and approvals, (A) would, if consummated, result in a transaction that is more favorable to the Company's stockholders from a financial point of view as compared to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (as modified by a Parent Alternative Transaction) and (B) is reasonably likely to be completed without undue delay.
(c) In addition to the other obligations of the Company set forth in this Section 5.4, the Company shall promptly advise Parent orally and in writing of any request for information with respect to any Takeover Proposal, or any inquiry with respect to or which could result in a Takeover Proposal, the material terms and conditions of such request, Takeover Proposal or inquiry, and the identity of the Person making the same.
(d) Nothing in this Section 5.4 shall permit the Company to terminate this Agreement except as specifically provided in ARTICLE VII.
Section 5.5 Company Stockholders Meeting. The Company shall take all action necessary in
accordance with applicable law and its articles of incorporation and bylaws to convene a meeting of its
stockholders as promptly as practicable after the date hereof for the purpose of voting on the Company Proposal. Subject to Section 5.4(a), the Board of Directors of the Company shall recommend
approval of the Company Proposal and shall take all lawful action to solicit such approval, including timely mailing the Proxy Statement/Prospectus to the stockholders of the Company.
Section 5.6 Parent Stockholders Meeting. Parent shall take all action necessary in accordance
with applicable law and its articles of incorporation and bylaws to convene a meeting of its stockholders as
promptly as practicable after the date hereof for the purpose of voting on the Company Proposal. The Board of Directors of Parent shall recommend approval of the Company Proposal and shall take all
lawful action to solicit such approval, including timely mailing the Proxy Statement/Prospectus to the stockholders of Parent.
Section 5.7 Registration Statement and Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
(a) Parent and the Company shall cooperate and promptly prepare the Registration Statement, and, subject to Parent's receiving promptly the required information from the Company, Parent shall file the Registration Statement with the SEC as soon as practicable after the date hereof. Parent shall use all reasonable efforts, and the Company shall cooperate with Parent (including furnishing promptly all information concerning the Company and the holders of Company Common Stock as may be reasonably requested by Parent), to have the Registration Statement (as it may be amended or supplemented) declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after such filing. Parent shall use all reasonable efforts, and the Company shall cooperate with Parent, to obtain all necessary state securities laws or "blue sky" permits, approvals and registrations in connection with the issuance of Parent Common Stock pursuant to the Merger.
(b) Parent shall cause the Registration Statement (including the Proxy Statement/Prospectus), at the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act, to comply as to form in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder. The Company shall cause the information it provides for such purpose to comply as to form in all material respects with such provisions.
A-59
(c) The Company hereby covenants and agrees with Parent that: (i) the Registration Statement (at the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act and at the Effective Time) shall not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading (provided, however, that this clause (i) shall apply only to information contained in the Registration Statement that was supplied by the Company for inclusion therein); and (ii) the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (at the time it is first mailed to stockholders of the Company and Parent, at the time of the Company Meeting and the Parent Meeting, and at the Effective Time) shall not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading (provided, however, that this clause (ii) shall apply only to information contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus that was supplied by the Company for inclusion therein). If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, any event with respect to the Company, or with respect to other information supplied by the Company for inclusion in the Registration Statement, occurs and such event is required to be described in an amendment to the Registration Statement, the Company shall promptly notify Parent of such occurrence and shall cooperate with Parent in the preparation and filing of such amendment. If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, any event with respect to the Company, or with respect to other information supplied by the Company for inclusion in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, occurs and such event is required to be described in a supplement to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the Company shall promptly notify Parent of such occurrence and shall cooperate with Parent in the preparation, filing and dissemination of such supplement.
(d) Parent hereby covenants and agrees with the Company that: (i) the Registration Statement (at the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act and at the Effective Time) shall not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading (provided, however, that this clause (i) shall not apply to any information contained in the Registration Statement that was supplied by the Company for inclusion therein); and (ii) the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (at the time it is first mailed to stockholders of the Company and Parent, at the time of the Company Meeting and the Parent Meeting, and at the Effective Time) shall not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading (provided, however, that this clause (ii) shall not apply to any information contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus that was supplied by the Company for inclusion therein). If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, any event with respect to Parent, or with respect to other information (not supplied by the Company) included in the Registration Statement, occurs and such event is required to be described in an amendment to the Registration Statement, such event shall be so described and such amendment shall be promptly prepared and filed. If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, any event with respect to Parent, or with respect to other information (not supplied by the Company) included in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, occurs and such event is required to be described in a supplement to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, Parent shall promptly notify the Company of such occurrence and shall cooperate with the Company in the preparation, filing and dissemination of such supplement.
(e) Neither the Registration Statement nor the Proxy Statement/Prospectus nor any amendment or supplement thereto shall be filed or disseminated to the stockholders of the Company or Parent without the approval of both Parent and the Company (not to be unreasonably withheld). Parent shall advise the Company, promptly after it receives notice thereof, of the time when the Registration Statement has become effective under the Securities Act, the issuance of any stop order with respect to the Registration Statement, the suspension of the qualification of the Parent Common Stock issuable in connection with the Merger for offering or sale in any
A-60
jurisdiction, or any comments or requests for additional information by the SEC with respect to the Registration Statement.
Section 5.8 Stock Exchange Listing. Parent shall cause the shares of Parent Common Stock to be
issued in the Merger and upon exercise of the Company Stock Options and the Company Warrants (if still
outstanding and as assumed by Parent) to be approved for listing on Parent's primary National Stock Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the Closing Date. Parent shall also cause
the Company Warrants (if still outstanding and as assumed by Parent) to be approved for listing on a National Stock Exchange prior to the Closing Date.
Section 5.9 Additional Arrangements. Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, each
of the Company and Parent shall take, or cause to be taken, all action and shall do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, appropriate or reasonably desirable under any applicable laws and regulations (including the HSR Act) or under applicable governing agreements to consummate and make
effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including using its reasonable best efforts to obtain all necessary waivers, consents and approvals and effecting all necessary registrations
and filings. Each of the Company and Parent shall take, or cause to be taken, all action or shall do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, appropriate or reasonably desirable to cause the
covenants and conditions applicable to the transactions contemplated hereby to be performed or satisfied as soon as practicable. In addition, if any Governmental Authority shall have issued any order,
decree, ruling or injunction, or taken any other action that would have the effect of restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting or preventing the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby, each of the Company and Parent shall use its reasonable efforts to have such order, decree, ruling or injunction or other action declared ineffective as soon as practicable.
Section 5.10 Agreements of Affiliates. At least 10 days prior to the Effective Time, the
Company shall cause to be prepared and delivered to Parent a list identifying all Persons who, at the
time of the Company Meeting, may be deemed to be "affiliates" of the Company as that term is used in paragraphs (c) and (d) of Rule 145 under the Securities Act. The Company shall
use its best efforts (without payment or compensation) to cause each Person who is identified as an affiliate of the Company in such list to execute and deliver to Parent, on or prior to the Closing
Date, a written agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 5.10. Parent shall be entitled to place legends as specified in such agreements on the Parent Certificates representing any
Parent Common Stock to be issued to such Persons in the Merger, irrespective of whether or not they sign such agreements.
Section 5.11 Section 16. Prior to the Closing Date, Parent and the Company, and their
respective boards of directors, shall adopt resolutions consistent with the interpretive guidance of
the SEC and take any other actions as may be required to cause any dispositions of Company Common Stock (including derivative securities with respect to Company Common Stock) or acquisitions of Parent
Common Stock (including derivative securities with respect to Parent Common Stock) resulting from the transactions contemplated hereby by each individual who is subject to the reporting requirements
of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Section 5.12 Public Announcements. Prior to the Closing, the Company and Parent shall consult
with each other before issuing any press release or otherwise making any public statement with respect
to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and shall not issue any press release or make any such public statement prior to obtaining the approval of the other party; provided, however, that
such approval shall not be required where such release or announcement is required by applicable law or stock exchange rule; and provided further, that either the Company or Parent may respond to
inquiries by the press or others regarding the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, so long as such responses are consistent with such Party's previously issued press releases.
A-61
Section 5.13 Notification of Certain Matters. The Company shall give prompt notice to Parent of
any of the following: (a) any representation or warranty contained in ARTICLE III being untrue or
inaccurate when made, (b) the occurrence of any event or development that would cause (or could reasonably be expected to cause) any representation or warranty contained in ARTICLE III to be
untrue or inaccurate on the Closing Date, or (c) any failure of the Company to comply with or satisfy any covenant, condition, or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it hereunder.
Parent shall give prompt notice to the Company of any of the following: (x) any representation or warranty contained in ARTICLE IV being untrue or inaccurate when made, (y) the
occurrence of any event or development that would cause (or could reasonably be expected to cause) any representation or warranty contained in ARTICLE IV to be untrue or inaccurate on the Closing
Date, or (z) any failure of Parent to comply with or satisfy any covenant, condition, or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it hereunder.
Section 5.14 Payment of Expenses. Subject to the provisions of Section 7.2 and
Section 7.3, each Party shall pay its own expenses incident to preparing for, entering into and
carrying out this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, whether or not the Merger shall be consummated, except that: (a) the fee for filing the Registration
Statement with the SEC and the costs and expenses associated with printing the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and complying with any applicable state securities or "blue sky" laws shall be borne by
Parent; and (b) the costs and expenses associated with mailing the Proxy Statement/Prospectus to the stockholders of (i) the Company, and soliciting the votes of the stockholders of the
Company, shall be borne by the Company, and (ii) Parent, and soliciting the votes of the stockholders of Parent, shall be borne by Parent.
Section 5.15 Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) Parent agrees that all rights to indemnification now existing in favor of any officers, directors, employees, controlling stockholders or agents of any of the Target Companies, as provided in their respective charters or bylaws (or similar organizational documents), and any existing indemnification agreements or arrangements of any of the Target Companies, shall survive the Merger and shall continue in full force and effect for a period of not less than six years from the Effective Time (or such longer period as may be provided in any existing indemnification agreement between any of the Target Companies, and any current or former officer or director thereof); provided, that, in the event any claim or claims are asserted or made within such six-year period, all rights to indemnification in respect of any such claim or claims shall continue until final disposition of any and all such claims.
(b) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall, for a period of six years after the Effective Time, indemnify, defend and hold harmless each person who is now, or has been at any time prior to the date of this Agreement or who becomes prior to the Effective Time, an officer, director, employee, controlling stockholder or agent of any of the Target Companies (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties") against all losses, expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, damages, liabilities and amounts that are paid in settlement with the approval of the indemnifying party (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) of, or otherwise in connection with, any threatened or actual claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (a "Claim"), based in whole or in part on or arising in whole or in part out of the fact that the Indemnified Party (or the person controlled by the Indemnified Party) is or was a director, officer, employee, controlling stockholder or agent (including a trustee or fiduciary of any Company Employee Benefit Plan but subject to any conditions or limitations on the indemnity set forth in the applicable Company Employee Benefit Plan) and pertaining to any matter existing or arising out of actions or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time (including any Claim arising out of this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby), whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Effective Time, in each case to the fullest extent permitted under applicable Nevada law, and shall pay any expenses, as incurred, in advance of the final disposition of any such action or proceeding to each
A-62
Indemnified Party to the fullest extent permitted under applicable Nevada law. In determining whether an Indemnified Party is entitled to indemnification under this Section 5.15, if requested by such Indemnified Party, such determination shall be made by special, independent counsel selected by Parent and approved by the Indemnified Party (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), and who has not otherwise performed services for Parent or any of its Affiliates within the last three years (other than in connection with such matters). Without limiting the foregoing, in the event any such claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation is brought against any Indemnified Party(ies) (whether arising before or after the Effective Time): (i) Parent shall have the right to control the defense of such matter with Parent's regularly engaged independent legal counsel or other counsel selected by Parent and reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified Party(ies), and Parent shall pay all reasonable fees and expenses of such counsel; and (ii) the Indemnified Party(ies) shall cooperate with Parent, at Parent's expense, in the defense of any such matter. Parent shall not be liable for any settlement effected without its prior written consent, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld. In the event of any Claim, any Indemnified Party wishing to claim indemnification shall promptly notify Parent thereof (provided, that failure to so notify Parent shall not affect the obligations of Parent except to the extent that Parent shall have been prejudiced as a result of such failure) and shall deliver to Parent the undertaking contemplated by the applicable provisions of the NRS, but without any requirement for the posting of a bond. Without limiting the foregoing, in the event any such Claim is brought against any of the Indemnified Parties, such Indemnified Party(ies) may retain only one law firm (plus one local counsel, if necessary) to represent them with respect to each such matter unless the use of counsel chosen to represent the Indemnified Parties would present such counsel with a conflict of interest, or the representation of all of the Indemnified Parties by the same counsel would be inappropriate due to actual or reasonably probable differing interests between them, in which case such additional counsel as may be required (as shall be reasonably determined by the Indemnified Parties and Parent) may be retained by the Indemnified Parties at the cost and expense of Parent and Parent shall pay all reasonable fees and expenses of such counsel for such Indemnified Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Section 5.15 shall be deemed to grant any right to any Indemnified Party which is not permitted to be granted to an officer, director, employee, controlling stockholder or agent of Parent under applicable Nevada law.
(c) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause to be maintained in effect for not less than six years from the Effective Time the current policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance maintained by the Company, but only to the extent related to actions or omissions prior to the Effective Time; provided, that (i) Parent may substitute therefor policies of at least the same coverage containing terms and conditions which are no less advantageous; (ii) such substitution shall not result in gaps or lapses in coverage with respect to matters occurring prior to the Effective Time; and (iii) Parent shall not be required to pay an annual premium in excess of 200% of the last annual premium paid by the Company prior to the date hereof and if Parent is unable to obtain the insurance required by this Section 5.15(c) it shall obtain as much comparable insurance as possible for an annual premium equal to such maximum amount.
(d) Following the Merger, if Parent or any of its successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other Person and shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger, or (ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any Person or Persons, then, and in each such case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of Parent and any of their successors and assigns, assume the obligations of the Parties and Parent set forth in this Section 5.15.
(e) This Section 5.15 shall survive the consummation of the Merger at the Effective Time, is intended to benefit the Company and the Indemnified Parties (each of whom may enforce the provisions of this Section 5.15) and shall be binding on the successors and assigns of Parent.
A-63
Section 5.16 Employees; Employee Benefits.
(a) For a period of six months following the Closing Date, the Company or its Subsidiaries shall, subject to earlier termination of employment for cause (as determined in accordance with the definition of "cause" set forth in the Company's Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy) or by voluntary termination, continue to provide those Persons (other than Persons currently covered by written employment agreements) who are employed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries immediately prior to the Effective Time (the "Continuing Employees"), with employment at respective levels of base salary and incentive and bonus opportunities (but not equity compensation) and benefits (including vacation, paid time off, medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment and disability benefits) that are substantially comparable, in the aggregate to each Continuing Employee, to those provided by the Target Companies immediately prior to the Effective Time; provided, that on and after October 1, 2005, each such Continuing Employee may, at the option of Parent, be enrolled in one or more of the Parent Employee Benefit Plans (with benefits of similarly situated employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries) rather than in any remaining Company Employee Benefit Plans. The Continuing Employees shall be eligible to participate in Parent's 401(k) plan immediately after the Effective Time, according to the terms of Parent's 401(k) plan and applicable law, and with the prior service credit provided for in Section 5.16(b).
(b) The service of each Continuing Employee with the Company or its Subsidiaries (or any predecessor employer) prior to the Effective Time shall be treated as service with Parent and its Subsidiaries for purposes of each Parent Employee Benefit Plan (including retirement, vacation, paid time off and severance plans) in which such Continuing Employee is eligible to participate after the Effective Time, including for purposes of eligibility, vesting and benefit levels and accruals (other than defined benefit pension plan accruals).
(c) Following the Effective Time, Parent shall, or shall cause its Subsidiaries to, (i) waive any pre-existing condition, exclusion, actively-at-work requirements or waiting periods and (ii) provide full credit for any co-payments, deductibles or similar payments made or incurred prior to the Effective Time (or, if later, any applicable plan transition date) for the plan year in which the Effective Time (or such transition date) occurs, in each case for purposes of each Parent Plan in which any Continuing Employee or his or her eligible dependents is eligible to participate after the Effective Time.
(d) Parent shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, honor, in accordance with its terms (but without duplication or multiple effect), each severance policy or plan listed on Section 5.16(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule and all obligations thereunder, including any rights or benefits arising as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby (either alone or in combination with any other event); provided that the period of time during which severance may be triggered under any severance policy or plan listed on Section 5.16(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule (without duplication or multiple effect) shall be extended, with respect to each Continuing Employee to which such policy or plan applies, for the period of such Continuing Employee's actual employment with the Company or its Subsidiaries after Closing (up to a maximum extension of six months for all covered participants under the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Employee Severance Policy and all covered participants under the Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy who are entitled to receive, as a Termination Payment thereunder, three months or less of Base Salary (as defined therein)). Parent hereby acknowledges that the consummation of the Merger constitutes a change of control, change in control or extraordinary transaction, as the case may be, for all purposes under such Company Employee Benefit Plans.
A-64
(e) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall be entitled to (i) amend, modify or terminate any nonqualified deferred compensation plan (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) maintained by any of the Target Companies prior to the Effective Time, as determined by the Company (with the approval of Parent), in order to comply with any rules, regulations or other guidance promulgated by any Governmental Entity under Section 409A of the Code or otherwise to avoid the imposition of any Tax or interest penalty on any participant therein under Section 409A of the Code and (ii) adopt and operate a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that will provide for the deferral of compensation in taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 2005, in lieu of deferral of such compensation under any nonqualified deferred compensation plan in existence as of the date hereof, and having such other terms and conditions as are substantially similar to the terms of any such existing nonqualified deferred compensation plan and are in compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Following the Effective Time, Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries or any of its or their respective employees to, take any action or omit to take any action that results, or would be reasonably likely to result, in the imposition of any Tax or interest penalty under Section 409A of the Code on any current or former participant in any such existing or new nonqualified deferred compensation plan, including any "material modification" (within the meaning of Section 885(d)(2)(B) of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004) of any such nonqualified deferred compensation plan with respect to amounts deferred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005. Parent shall indemnify and hold harmless each such participant on an after-tax basis from any Tax or interest penalty imposed under Section 409A of the Code to the extent imposed as a result of any such act or omission.
(f) The parties agree that the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall constitute a "Change in Control" as defined in those employment agreements entered into among the Company, Gruy Petroleum Management Co. and certain executives as identified on Section 5.16(f) of the Company Disclosure Schedule and that on and after the Effective Time such executives shall have "Good Reason" to voluntarily terminate employment in accordance with such agreements, which termination shall entitle such executives to lump sum termination payments, benefits continuation and other benefits pursuant to Sections 8(c)-(e) of such agreements. The lump sum termination payments payable to the executives upon voluntary termination of employment pursuant to Section 8(c) of the employment agreements are set forth on Section 5.16(f) of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
(g) The parties agree that the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall constitute a "Change of Control" as defined in the Company's Outside Director Policy and that the removal of the Company's directors as of the Effective Time as provided in Section 2.3(c) of this Agreement entitles the outside directors of the Company to additional compensation pursuant to Section 3.1 of such policy. The additional compensation payable to each outside director pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Company's Outside Director Policy is set forth on Section 5.16(g) of the Company Disclosure Schedule. Company Stock Options held by outside directors of the Company shall be cashed out in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.4(c)(iii) of this Agreement.
(h) Payments required to be made under the executive employment agreements described in Section 5.16(f) and the Company's Outside Director Policy and the other severance policies or plans described in Section 5.16(d) shall be made at the time provided in such agreements, policies or plans, or, if time of payment is not provided for, within 5 days of an employee or director satisfying the requirements for entitlement to such payments; provided, however, that any payments subject to Section 409A of the Code and related rules, regulations or other guidance made to a key employee (as defined in Code Section 416(i) without regard to subsection (5) thereof) shall be made at a time that will not result in the imposition of any Tax or interest
A-65
penalty under Section 409A of the Code, even if compliance with Section 409A of the Code will result in a delay in payment.
(i) To the extent that any employment agreement or written Company policy does not already so specifically provide, if any of the persons set forth on Section 5.16(i) of the Company Disclosure Schedule pays or becomes obligated to pay any excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code on any payment he receives (whether under any such employment agreement, policy or otherwise, and including but not limited to the value of accelerated vesting of Company Stock Options) in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the parties agree that the Company shall pay to such person an amount equal to the total excise tax paid or payable.
Section 5.17 Parent Board of Directors. At the Effective Time, Parent shall cause one then
existing member of the Company's Board of Directors selected by Parent to be elected to the Board of Directors
of Parent.
Section 5.18 Registration Statements Relating to Company Warrants and Company Convertible Notes. Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-3 with respect to the shares of Parent Common
Stock to be issued upon exercise of the Company Warrants (if reasonably expected to be outstanding at the Effective Time in accordance with their currently existing terms) and conversion of the
Company Convertible Notes. Parent shall use all reasonable efforts to have such registration statement become effective at the Effective Time and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration
statement (and maintain the current status of the related prospectus) for so long as any Company Warrants and Company Convertible Notes remain outstanding in accordance with their currently existing
terms. The provisions of this Section 5.18 are intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, the Parties and each holder of a Company Warrant and their respective heirs and
representatives. To the extent required by applicable securities law and regulations, Parent shall also file with the SEC a registration statement with respect to the Company Warrants and Company
Convertible Notes.
Section 5.19 Bank Credit Agreements. Each of Parent and the Company shall use its reasonable
best efforts to obtain, on or before the Closing Date: (a) any required consents of the lenders
under the Parent Bank Credit Agreement and the Company Bank Credit Agreement, respectively, to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement (which in the case of the Company
Bank Credit Agreement shall include the lenders' consent to the TEL Distribution and the lenders' agreement to waive any default that could arise if any of the holders of the Company Convertible Notes
exercises its right to convert or to have the Company repurchase its Notes); or (b) a new credit facility for Parent in an amount sufficient to pay off all then outstanding indebtedness under
both the Parent Bank Credit Agreement and the Company Bank Credit Agreement and provide a similar amount of borrowing capacity as the Parent Bank Credit Agreement and the Company Bank Credit
Agreement.
(a) Parent, Merger Sub and the Company shall each, and shall cause its respective subsidiaries to, use its reasonable efforts to cause the Merger to qualify as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and to obtain the Tax opinions set forth in Section 6.2(d) and Section 6.3(c). Parent, Merger Sub and the Company agree to file all Tax Returns consistent with the treatment of the Merger as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. This Agreement is intended to constitute a "plan of reorganization" within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.368-2(g).
(b) Officers of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company shall execute and deliver to Thompson & Knight LLP, Tax counsel for the Company, and Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Tax counsel for Parent, certificates substantially in the form agreed to by the Parties and such law firms
A-66
at such time or times as may reasonably be requested by such law firms, including prior to the time the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC and the Effective Time, in connection with such Tax counsel's respective delivery of opinions pursuant to Section 6.2(d) and Section 6.3(c). Each of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts not to take or cause to be taken any action that would cause to be untrue (or fail to take or cause not to be taken any action which would cause to be untrue) any of the certifications and representations included in the certificates described in this Section 5.20.
Section 5.21 Termination of the Company Stock Ownership Plan. The Company sponsors and maintains
the Company 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the "KSOP"). Prior to the
Closing Date, the Board of Directors of the Company shall take all such action as may be necessary to terminate the KSOP effective as of a date prior to the Closing Date. As soon as practicable after
the date hereof, the current trustee of the KSOP shall be replaced by a qualified institutional trustee selected by the Company and acceptable to Parent. On or prior to the termination date, the new
trustee of the KSOP shall cause the KSOP to repay any existing loan(s) of the KSOP (in accordance with the terms of the loan, the terms of the KSOP, applicable law and in a manner mutually acceptable
to the Company and Parent) and the plan administrator shall allocate any unallocated assets remaining after the loan is repaid in accordance with the terms of the KSOP document and applicable law.
Upon the termination date, the accounts of all participants affected by the termination shall become fully vested and the plan administrator of the KSOP shall direct the trustee of the trust related
to the KSOP to distribute the assets remaining in the trust, after payment of any expenses properly allocable thereto and after receipt of a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service to
the effect that the termination of the KSOP will not adversely affect its qualified status, to participants and beneficiaries in proportion to their respective account balances; provided, however,
that distributions will not be delayed until after receipt of a favorable determination letter with respect to those participants who are otherwise entitled to a distribution under the KSOP by reason
of death, disability, retirement, termination of employment or any other reason permitted under the terms of the KSOP (other than plan termination). Except as otherwise provided in the KSOP, any
distributions made after termination of the KSOP may be made, in whole or in part, in cash or in kind; provided, however, that participants shall have the right, as provided in the KSOP document, to
demand payment from their vested KSOP Accounts under the KSOP in the form of Company Common Stock or if the distribution occurs after the Closing Date, Parent Common Stock (except to the extent of the
value of any factional shares, which shall be distributed in cash). The termination of the KSOP and the exercise of all rights, including but not limited to voting, appurtenant to Company stock in the
KSOP shall be effected in a manner mutually acceptable to Company and Parent. Parent agrees to take all such action as may be necessary to permit rollovers of participant distributions from the KSOP
to a defined contribution plan maintained by Parent or one of its Subsidiaries, provided that such defined contribution plan shall be required to accept a direct rollover in kind only to the extent
permitted under the terms of such plan.
Section 5.22 SOX 404 Certification. Each of the Company and Parent shall complete and include in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004,
management's assessment of the Company's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of SOX.
Section 5.23 Reserve Data. Each of the Company and Parent shall deliver to the other Party,
promptly after filing with the SEC its respective Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2004, a true and complete copy of all oil and gas reserve data supporting the oil and gas reserve disclosures by such Party in its respective Annual Report.
Section 5.24 Dividend of TEL Offshore Trust Units.
(a) Prior to the tenth day before the date of the Company Meeting, the Board of Directors of the Company may declare a distribution (the "TEL Distribution") of trust units of TEL Offshore
A-67
Trust (the "TEL Units") to the holders of Company Common Stock, with each share of Company Common Stock entitled to receive that number of TEL Units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the number of TEL Units owned by the Company on the TEL Distribution Record Date by the number of then outstanding shares of Company Common Stock; provided, however, that the Company may pay cash in lieu of fractional TEL Units or, in any jurisdiction in which the Company reasonably determines on the advice of counsel that distribution of the TEL Units is inadvisable under applicable state "blue sky" laws (provided, that the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts beginning as soon as practicable following the date hereof to pursue diligently appropriate registrations or exemptions in such jurisdictions) or will likely delay the distribution of the TEL Units beyond the Effective Time. In the event of any stock split, combination, reclassification, share dividend or other event similarly altering or affecting the value of TEL Units, the foregoing shall be adjusted to the extent deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors of the Company, and subject to the reasonable approval of Parent, to accomplish the purposes hereof. The resolutions of the Board of Directors declaring the TEL Distribution and setting forth the terms and conditions described above shall in form and substance be reasonably satisfactory to Parent.
(b) The TEL Distribution shall occur on a date, if at all, prior to the Effective Time and be payable to the holders of record of Company Common Stock at the close of business on the record date fixed by the Company's Board of Directors for the TEL Distribution (the "TEL Distribution Record Date").
Section 5.25 Company Debt Instruments.
(a) The Company shall provide, or shall cause to be provided, in accordance with the applicable provisions of each of the indentures relating to the Company Convertible Notes and the Company Senior Secured Notes (such Company Convertible Notes and Company Senior Secured Notes, collectively, the "Notes" and such indentures, collectively, the "Indentures"), to the trustee under each such Indenture and to each Holder (as defined in each respective Indenture), any notices required by the Indentures by virtue of a Change of Control (as defined in each Indenture).
(b) The Surviving Corporation shall, on the Closing Date, execute such supplemental indentures to the Indentures as are required under the Indentures.
(c) The Surviving Corporation shall take all such further actions, including the delivery of any officers' certificates and opinions of counsel required by the Indentures, as may be necessary to comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Indentures.
(d) Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall deliver to all Holders the notices required by the Indentures with respect to the right of the Holders to require repurchase of the Notes and or the conversion thereof upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, and thereafter Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall comply with all other provisions of the Indentures relating to the right of Holders to require repurchase of the Notes and/or the conversion thereof.
Section 5.26 Conversion of 1996 Preferred. Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall cause
each of the Company Subsidiaries that is Controlled By the Company and who owns shares of 1996 Preferred to
convert all of the issued and outstanding shares of the 1996 Preferred into shares of Company Common Stock, pursuant to the terms set forth in the certificate of designations for the 1996 Preferred.
A-68
Section 6.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger. The respective
obligations of each Party to effect the Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the Closing Date, of the following conditions,
any or all of which may be waived in whole or in part by both Parent and the Company:
(a) Stockholder Approval. The Company Proposal shall have been duly and validly approved and adopted by a vote of a majority of the shares of Company Common Stock, all as required by the NRS and the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the Company (the "Required Company Stockholder Vote"). The Company Proposal shall have been duly and validly approved and adopted by the stockholders of Parent, all as required by the NRS and the articles of incorporation and bylaws of Parent (the "Required Parent Stockholder Vote").
(b) Approvals of Governmental Authorities. Any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act shall have expired or been terminated and all filings required to be made prior to the Effective Time with, and all consents, approvals, permits and authorizations required to be obtained prior to the Effective Time from, any Governmental Authority in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby by the Company, Parent and Merger Sub shall have been made or obtained (as the case may be), except where the failure to obtain any such consents, approvals, permits and authorizations (other than those from the SEC or with respect to the HSR Act) would not be reasonably likely to result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent (assuming the Merger has taken place) or to materially adversely affect the consummation of the Merger.
(c) Securities Law Matters. The Registration Statement shall have been declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act and shall be effective at the Effective Time, and no stop order suspending such effectiveness shall have been issued, no action, suit, proceeding or investigation by the SEC to suspend such effectiveness shall have been initiated and be continuing, and all necessary approvals under state securities laws relating to the issuance or trading of the Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger shall have been received.
(d) No Injunctions or Restraints. No temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the Merger shall be in effect; provided, however, that, prior to invoking this condition, each Party shall have complied fully with its obligations under Section 5.9 and, in addition, shall have used all reasonable efforts to have any such decree, ruling, injunction or order vacated, except as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement.
(e) Stock Exchange Listing. The shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger and upon exercise of the Company Stock Options and the Company Warrants shall have been authorized for listing on Parent's primary National Stock Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance. The Company Warrants shall have been authorized for listing on Parent's primary National Stock Exchange.
Section 6.2 Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. The obligations of Parent and
Merger Sub to effect the Merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions, any or all of which may be waived in
whole or in part by Parent and Merger Sub:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of the Company set forth in ARTICLE III shall, taken individually and together, be true and correct in all
A-69
respects (provided that any representation or warranty contained therein that is qualified by a materiality standard or a Material Adverse Effect qualification or a knowledge qualification, or qualification of like effect, shall not be deemed to be so qualified for purposes of compliance with this condition) as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representation or warranty speaks only as of an earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of that time, and Parent shall have received a certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of the Company to such effect; provided, however, that the condition set forth in this Section 6.2(a) shall be deemed to be satisfied even if one or more of such representations and warranties are not true and correct, so long as the failure of such representations and warranties (without, as set forth above, giving effect to the individual materiality thresholds or qualifications (such as, without limitation, a Material Adverse Effect qualification) or knowledge qualifications otherwise included as a part of such representations and warranties) to be true and correct (individually or in the aggregate) has not had and would not be reasonably likely to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Company or materially adversely affect the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Performance of Covenants and Agreements by the Company. The Company shall have performed in all material respects all covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and Parent shall have received a certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of the Company to such effect.
(c) No Material Adverse Change. From the date of this Agreement through the Closing, there shall not have occurred any Material Adverse Effect on the Target Companies, taken as a whole.
(d) Tax Opinion. Parent shall have received an opinion (reasonably acceptable in form and substance to Parent) from counsel selected by Parent, on the date on which the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC and on the Closing Date, in each case dated as of such respective date, to the effect that (i) the Merger will be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of Parent, the Company and Merger Sub will be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, (iii) no gain or loss will be recognized by Parent, the Company or Merger Sub as a result of the Merger, and such opinion shall not have been withdrawn, revoked or modified. Such opinion may be based upon customary assumptions and on representations of the Parties and stockholders of the Parties. If Parent does not receive such opinion from such counsel, the Company has the right to provide such opinion from its counsel, and if so provided, then the condition contained in this Section 6.2(d) shall be deemed to have been satisfied.
(e) Rights Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor consummation of the Merger shall have caused or shall cause any of the Company Rights to become exercisable or to be distributed.
(f) Consents. All consents and approvals required to be obtained by any of the Target Companies prior to the Effective Time from any Persons (other than any Governmental Authority) in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall have been made or obtained, except to the extent that the failure to obtain such consents and approvals, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not be reasonably likely to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Target Companies, taken as a whole, or materially adversely affect the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
A-70
Section 6.3 Conditions to Obligation of the Company. The obligation of the Company to effect the
Merger is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions, any or all of which may be waived in whole or in
part by the Company:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub set forth in ARTICLE IV shall, taken individually and together, be true and correct in all respects (provided that any representation or warranty contained therein that is qualified by a materiality standard or a Material Adverse Effect qualification or a knowledge qualification, or qualification of like effect, shall not be deemed to be so qualified for purposes of compliance with this condition) as of the date of this Agreement and (except to the extent such representation or warranty speaks only as of an earlier date) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of that time, and the Company shall have received a certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of Parent to such effect; provided, however, that the condition set forth in this Section 6.3(a) shall be deemed to be satisfied even if one or more of such representations and warranties are not true and correct, so long as the failure of such representations and warranties (without, as set forth above, giving effect to the individual materiality thresholds or qualifications (such as, without limitation, a Material Adverse Effect qualification) or knowledge qualifications otherwise included as a part of such representations and warranties) to be true and correct (individually or in the aggregate) has not had and would not be reasonably likely to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect on Parent or materially adversely affect the ability of the Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Performance of Covenants and Agreements by Parent and Merger Sub. Parent and Merger Sub shall have performed in all material respects all covenants and agreements required to be performed by them under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and the Company shall have received a certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of Parent to such effect.
(c) Tax Opinion. The Company shall have received an opinion (reasonably acceptable in form and substance to the Company) from counsel selected by the Company, on the date on which the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC and on the Closing Date, in each case dated as of such respective date, to the effect that (i) the Merger will be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of Parent, the Company and Merger Sub will be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, (iii) no gain or loss will be recognized by Parent, the Company and Merger Sub as a result of the Merger, and (iv) no gain or loss, except with respect to the amount of cash received in lieu of fractional shares by former holders of Company Common Stock and except with respect to any cash received by any Dissenting Stockholder, will be recognized by a stockholder of the Company as a result of the Merger, and such opinion shall not have been withdrawn, revoked or modified. Such opinion may be based upon customary assumptions and on representations of the Parties and stockholders of the Parties. If the Company does not receive such opinion from such counsel, Parent has the right to provide such opinion from its counsel, and if so provided, then the condition contained in this Section 6.3(c) shall be deemed to have been satisfied.
(d) No Material Adverse Change. From the date of this Agreement through the Closing, there shall not have occurred any Material Adverse Effect on the Parent Companies, taken as a whole.
A-71
(e) Rights Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor consummation of the Merger shall have caused or shall cause any of the Parent Rights to become exercisable or to be distributed.
(f) Delivery of Transfer Instructions. Parent shall have delivered to its authorized transfer agent an irrevocable letter of instruction in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company authorizing and directing the transfer to holders of shares of Company Common Stock one or more Parent Certificates representing those shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued to such holders upon surrender of such holders' certificates representing such shares of Company Common Stock.
(g) Consents. All consents and approvals required to be obtained by any of the Parent Companies prior to the Effective Time from any Persons (other than any Governmental Authority) in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall have been made or obtained, except to the extent that the failure to obtain such consents and approvals, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not be reasonably likely to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Parent Companies, taken as a whole, or materially adversely affect the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 7.1 Termination Rights. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned
at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Required Company Stockholder
Vote or the Required Parent Company Vote, respectively:
(a) By mutual written consent of Parent and the Company;
(b) By either the Company or Parent if (i) the Merger has not been consummated by July 25, 2005 (which date shall automatically be extended to October 1, 2005 in the event that the SEC has not declared the Registration Statement effective by June 1, 2005) (provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this clause (i) shall not be available to any Party whose breach of any representation or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or agreement under this Agreement has been the cause of or resulted in the failure of the Merger to occur on or before such date); (ii) any Governmental Authority shall have issued an order, decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger and such order, decree, ruling or other action shall have become final and nonappealable (provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this clause (ii) shall not be available to any Party until such Party has used all reasonable efforts to remove such injunction, order or decree); or (iii) the Company Proposal shall not have been approved by (A) the Required Company Stockholder Vote at the Company Meeting or at any adjournment thereof or (B) the Required Parent Stockholder Vote at the Parent Meeting or at any adjournment thereof;
(c) By Parent if (i) there has been a breach of the representations and warranties made by the Company in ARTICLE III of this Agreement such that the condition described in Section 6.2(a) is not met (provided, however, that Parent shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this clause (i) unless Parent has given the Company notice of such breach and the Company has failed to cure such breach within 10 days following such notice (but in any event not later than July 25, 2005 (which date shall automatically be extended to October 1, 2005 in the event that the SEC has not declared the Registration Statement effective by June 1, 2005)), and the condition described in Section 6.2(a), other than the provision thereof relating to the certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of the Company, would not be satisfied if the Closing
A-72
were to occur on the day on which Parent gives the Company notice of such termination); or (ii) the Company has failed to comply in any material respect with any of its covenants or agreements contained in this Agreement and such failure has not been, or cannot be, cured within 10 days after notice and demand for cure thereof (but in any event not later than July 25, 2005 (which date shall automatically be extended to October 1, 2005 in the event that the SEC has not declared the Registration Statement effective by June 1, 2005));
(d) By the Company if (i) there has been a breach of the representations and warranties made by Parent and Merger Sub in ARTICLE IV of this Agreement such that the condition described in Section 6.3(a) is not met (provided, however, that the Company shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this clause (i) unless the Company has given Parent notice of such breach and Parent has failed to cure such breach within 10 days following such notice (but in any event not later than July 25, 2005 (which date shall automatically be extended to October 1, 2005 in the event that the SEC has not declared the Registration Statement effective by June 1, 2005)), and the condition described in Section 6.3(a), other than the provision thereof relating to the certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of Parent, would not be satisfied if the Closing were to occur on the day on which the Company gives Parent notice of such termination); or (ii) Parent or Merger Sub has failed to comply in any material respect with any of its respective covenants or agreements contained in this Agreement, and, in either such case, such breach or failure has not been, or cannot be, cured within 10 days after notice and a demand for cure thereof (but in any event not later than July 25, 2005 (which date shall automatically be extended to October 1, 2005 in the event that the SEC has not declared the Registration Statement effective by June 1, 2005));
(e) by Parent, if
(i) the Board of Directors of the Company shall have withdrawn or modified or amended in any respect adverse to Parent its adoption of or recommendation in favor of this Agreement or the Merger or shall have failed to make such favorable recommendation;
(ii) the Board of Directors of the Company (or any committee thereof) shall have recommended to the stockholders of the Company any Takeover Proposal or shall have resolved to, or publicly announced an intention to, do so; or
(iii) the Company shall have commited a willful, material breach of Section 5.4.
(f) by the Company, if prior to the Company Meeting, (A) the Company shall not have breached Section 5.4 in any material respect, (B) the Board of Directors of the Company authorizes the Company, subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4 and Section 7.1(f), to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a Superior Proposal and the Company notifies Parent in writing that it intends to enter into such an agreement, attaching the most current version of such agreement to such notice and (C) the Company prior to such termination pays to Parent in immediately available funds any fees required to be paid pursuant to Section 7.3.
The party desiring to terminate this Agreement shall give written notice of such termination to the other party.
Section 7.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated by either the Company or
Parent pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.1, this Agreement shall forthwith become void
except for, and there shall be no further obligation on the part of any Party or its respective Affiliates, directors, officers or stockholders except pursuant to, the provisions of
Section 5.3(c) (but only to the extent of the confidentiality and indemnification provisions contained therein), Section 5.7(c), Section 5.7(d), Section 5.14 and
Section 7.3, ARTICLE VIII and the Confidentiality Agreement (which shall continue pursuant to their terms); provided, however, that a termination of this Agreement shall
A-73
not relieve any Party from any liability for damages incurred as a result of a willful breach by such Party of its representations, warranties, covenants, agreements or other obligations hereunder occurring prior to such termination.
Section 7.3 Fees and Expenses. If (i) this Agreement is terminated pursuant to
Section 7.1(e) or Section 7.1(f) or (ii) (A) a Takeover Proposal in respect of
the Company is publicly announced or is proposed or offered or made to the Company or the Company's stockholders prior to this Agreement having been approved by the Required Company Stockholder Vote,
(B) this Agreement is terminated by either party, as applicable, pursuant to Section 7.1(b) (solely with respect to the failure to obtain the Required Company Stockholder Vote without
breach by the Company of its obligations under Section 5.4) and (C) within 12 months following such termination the Company shall consummate or enter into, directly or indirectly,
an agreement with the proponent of such Takeover Proposal or an Affiliate of such proponent, the Company shall promptly, but in no event later than one business day after termination of this Agreement
(or on the date of such consummation or, if earlier, entry into such agreement in the case of (ii) above), pay Parent a fee in immediately available funds of $45,000,000. For purposes of this
Section 7.3, the references in the definition of Takeover Proposal to 10% shall be changed to 50%.
Section 8.1 Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties. None of the representations or
warranties contained in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the consummation of
the Merger.
Section 8.2 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the Parties at any time before or after
the Required Company Stockholder Vote or the Required Parent Stockholder Vote; provided,
however, that, after any such approval, no amendment shall be made that by law requires further approval by such stockholders without such further approval. This Agreement may not be amended except by
a written instrument signed by an authorized representative of each of the Parties.
Section 8.3 Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be
in writing and either delivered personally (effective upon delivery), by facsimile
transmission (effective on the next day after transmission), by recognized overnight delivery service (effective on the next day after delivery to the service), or by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid and return receipt requested (effective on the third business day after the date of mailing), at the following
A-74
addresses or facsimile transmission numbers (or at such other address(es) or facsimile transmission number(s) for a Party as shall be specified by like notice):
| To Parent and/or Merger Sub: |
Cimarex Energy Co. 1700 Lincoln, Suite 1800 Denver, Colorado 80203 Attention: Paul Korus |
|
with a copy to: |
Holme Roberts & Owen LLP 1700 Lincoln, Suite 4100 Denver, Colorado 80203 Attention: Thomas A. Richardson and J. Gregory Holloway |
|
To the Company: |
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. 600 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1100 Irving, Texas 75039 Attention: Jerry Box |
|
with a copy to: |
Thompson & Knight LLP 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75201 Attention: Andrew B. Derman and Joe Dannenmaier |
Section 8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of
which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become effective when one or
more counterparts have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Parties, it being understood that all Parties need not sign the same counterpart.
Section 8.5 Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement that is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such
invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or
provisions of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, such provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is
enforceable. This Section shall be subject to Section 8.8.
Section 8.6 Entire Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement (together with the
Confidentiality Agreement and the documents and instruments delivered by the Parties in connection with this Agreement):
(a) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof; and
(b) except as provided in ARTICLE II and Section 5.3(c), Section 5.3(d), Section 5.15, Section 5.16, and Section 5.18, is solely for the benefit of the
Parties and their respective successors, legal representatives and assigns and does not confer on any other Person any rights or remedies hereunder.
Section 8.7 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects, including validity,
interpretation and effect, by the laws of the State of Delaware regardless of the laws that
might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
Section 8.8 No Remedy in Certain Circumstances. Each Party agrees that, should any court or
other competent authority hold any provision of this Agreement or part hereof to be null, void or unenforceable, or
order any Party to take any action inconsistent herewith or not to take an action consistent herewith or required hereby, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining
A-75
provisions and obligations contained or set forth herein shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby, unless the foregoing inconsistent action or the failure to take any action constitutes a material breach of this Agreement or makes this Agreement impossible to perform, in which case this Agreement shall terminate pursuant to ARTICLE VII. Except as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, to the extent that a Party took an action inconsistent herewith or failed to take action consistent herewith or required hereby pursuant to an order or judgment of a court or other competent Governmental Authority, such Party shall not incur any liability or obligation unless such Party breached its obligations under Section 5.9 or did not in good faith seek to resist or object to the imposition or entering of such order or judgment.
Section 8.9 Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by any of the Parties (whether by operation of law or
otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other Parties. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Parties
and their respective successors and assigns.
Section 8.10 Waivers. At any time prior to the Effective Time, the Parties may, to the extent
legally allowed: (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations
or other acts of the other Parties, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto, and (c) waive
performance of any of the covenants or agreements, or satisfaction of any of the conditions, contained herein. Any agreement on the part of a Party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only
if set forth in a written instrument signed by an authorized representative of such Party. Except as provided in this Agreement, no action taken pursuant to this Agreement, including any investigation
by or on behalf of any Party, shall be deemed to constitute a waiver by the Party taking such action of compliance with, or reliance on, any representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
contained in this Agreement. The waiver by any Party of a breach of any provision hereof shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach of the same or any other
provisions hereof.
Section 8.11 Confidentiality Agreement. The Confidentiality Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect following the execution of this Agreement until terminated as described in Section 7.2,
is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and shall constitute a part of this Agreement for all purposes; provided, however, that any standstill provisions contained therein shall, effective as of
the Closing, be deemed to have been waived to the extent necessary for the Parties to consummate the Merger in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Any and all information received by Parent
and the Company pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be governed by the applicable terms and provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement.
Section 8.12 Incorporation. Exhibits and Schedules referred to herein are attached to and by
this reference incorporated herein for all purposes.
[Signature Page Follows]
A-76
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, on the date first written above.
| "Company" MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. |
"Parent" CIMAREX ENERGY CO. |
|||
By: |
/s/ JERRY BOX |
By: |
/s/ F. H. MERELLI |
|
| Name: | Jerry Box | Name: | F.H. Merelli | |
| Title: | Chairman | Title: | Chairman, CEO and President |
"Merger Sub" CIMAREX NEVADA ACQUISITION CO. |
||||
By: |
/s/ GARY C. EVANS |
By: |
/s/ F. H. MERELLI |
|
| Name: | Gary C. Evans | Name: | F.H. Merelli | |
| Title: | President and CEO | Title: | Chairman, CEO and President |
A-77
to
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of February 18, 2005, by and among Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").
WHEREAS, the Company, Parent and Merger Sub entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 25, 2005 by and among such Parties (the "Merger Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Parties have differing interpretations of the meaning of Section 5.16(d) of the Merger Agreement; and
WHEREAS, due to information unknown to the Parties at the time the Merger Agreement was entered into, with respect to the Company's representations and warranties under Section 3.15(f) of the Merger Agreement, the Company cannot satisfy the condition to closing set forth in Section 6.3(c) of the Merger Agreement as it is currently written; and
WHEREAS, each of the Parties to the Merger Agreement desires to enter into this Amendment in order to amend the above-referenced provisions of the Merger Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein and in the Merger Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
AMENDMENTS
Section 1.1 Employees; Employee Benefits. Section 5.16(d) of the Merger Agreement shall hereby be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"(d) Parent shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, honor, in accordance with its terms (but without duplication or multiple effect), each severance policy or plan listed on Section 5.16(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule and all obligations thereunder, including any rights or benefits arising as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby (either alone or in combination with any other event); provided that the end of the Transaction Period under the Company's Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy shall be extended from the 180th day following the Closing to the first anniversary of the Closing and the period of time during which severance may be triggered under the Company's Employee Severance Policy shall end on the first anniversary of the Closing (and no severance may be triggered under either such policy or plan after such date). With respect to the Company's Employee Severance Policy, the Parties acknowledge and agree that if a Continuing Employee is involuntarily terminated for any reason other than cause, poor performance or refusal to be reassigned (with respect to duties) or if a Continuing Employee voluntarily terminates employment for the reasons set forth in the specific eligibility provisions related to a change in control as provided in the Employee Severance Policy, then such employee shall be entitled to (i) a severance payment equal to one month's base pay for each year of service (up to a maximum of twelve months) payable in accordance with the terms of the first paragraph of Section III of the Employee Severance Policy, (ii) have his or her COBRA premiums reduced to the amount the employee would be required to pay if he or she were an active employee, for a number of months equal to the same number of months of severance pay received by the employee, (iii) an additional payment equal to the pro-rata share of any annual short-term
A-78
incentive bonus the employee might have been eligible to receive based on Company and individual performance (with the amount of any such bonus received by such employee during fiscal year 2005 as the base for any such proration), and (iv) a payment equal to the amount of accrued but unused vacation pay and commissions earned to the date of termination of employment. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the Termination Payment under the Company's Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy is the "revised stay bonus" listed on the attachment to that policy, and that the amount of the revised stay bonus for each covered employee has previously been furnished to Parent. In addition, in the event that a Continuing Employee's employment is involuntarily terminated other than for cause (as determined in accordance with the definition of "cause" set forth in the Company's Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy) on or after the Closing Date but before the end of the 6-month period following the Closing Date, then such employee shall be entitled to receive an additional payment equal to the base salary and incentive bonus opportunities (determined, with respect to bonus, as set forth above) and the value of benefits such employee would have received (absent such involuntary termination) during the remainder of such 6-month period. Parent hereby acknowledges that the consummation of the Merger constitutes a change of control, change in control or extraordinary transaction, as the case may be, for all purposes under such Company Employee Benefit Plans. To the extent not specifically otherwise addressed in this Section 5.16(d), the written terms of the Employee Severance Policy and the Extraordinary Transaction Compensation Policy shall continue to apply."
Section 1.2 Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. Section 6.3(c) of the Merger Agreement shall hereby be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"(c) Tax Opinion. The Company shall have received an opinion (reasonably acceptable in form and substance to the Company) from counsel selected by the Company, on the date on which the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC and on the Closing Date, in each case dated as of such respective date, to the effect that (i) the Merger will be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of Parent, the Company and Merger Sub will be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, (iii) no gain or loss will be recognized by Parent, the Company or Merger Sub as a result of the Merger, (iv) no gain or loss will be recognized by U.S. stockholders of the Company with respect to shares of Company Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock that are exchanged solely for Parent Common Stock in the Merger, except with respect to the amount of cash received instead of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock by U.S. stockholders of Company Common Stock and except with respect to any cash received by any Dissenting Stockholder, and (v) no gain or loss will be recognized by non-U.S. stockholders of the Company with respect to shares of Company Common Stock that are exchanged solely for Parent Common Stock in the Merger, provided such non-U.S. stockholders have not held (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock at any time during the shorter of (1) the five-year period ending at the Effective Time of the Merger or (2) the period during which such non-U.S. stockholders held such shares of Company Common Stock, and such opinion shall not have been withdrawn, revoked or modified. Such opinion may be based upon customary assumptions and on representations of the Parties and stockholders of the Parties. If the Company does not receive such opinion from such counsel, Parent has the right to provide such opinion from its counsel, and if so provided, then the condition contained in this Section 6.3(c) shall be deemed to have been satisfied."
Section 1.3 General. All references to the "Agreement" in the Merger Agreement shall mean the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment,
A-79
all provisions of the Merger Agreement remain unmodified and in full force and effect. This Amendment shall be effective as of February 18, 2005.
ARTICLE 2
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 2.1 Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Merger Agreement.
Section 2.2 Applicable Law. This Amendment shall be governed in all respects, including validity, interpretation and effect, by the laws of the State of Delaware regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
Section 2.3 Descriptive Headings. The descriptive headings herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Amendment.
Section 2.4 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Parties, it being understood that all Parties need not sign the same counterpart.
[Signature Page Follows]
A-80
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, on the date first written above.
"Company" MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. |
"Parent" CIMAREX ENERGY CO. |
|||||
By: |
/s/ GARY C. EVANS |
By: |
/s/ F.H. MERELLI |
|||
| Name: | Gary C. Evans | Name: | F.H. Merelli | |||
| Title: | President and CEO | Title: | Chairman, CEO and President | |||
"Merger Sub" CIMAREX NEVADA ACQUISITION CO. |
||||||
By: |
/s/ F.H. MERELLI |
|||||
| Name: | F.H. Merelli | |||||
| Title: | Chairman, CEO and President | |||||
A-81
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of April 20, 2005, by and among Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").
WHEREAS, the Company, Parent and Merger Sub entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 25, 2005 by and among such Parties, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto among such Parties dated as of February 18, 2005 (the "Merger Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, in connection with filing Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement, each of the Parties to the Merger Agreement desires to enter into this Amendment in order to amend a condition to closing of the Merger Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein and in the Merger Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
AMENDMENT
Section 1.1 Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. Section 6.3(c) of the Merger Agreement shall hereby be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"(c) Tax Opinion. The Company shall have received an opinion (reasonably acceptable in form and substance to the Company) from counsel selected by the Company, on the date on which the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC and on the Closing Date, in each case dated as of such respective date, to the effect that (i) the Merger will be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of Parent, the Company and Merger Sub will be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, (iii) no gain or loss will be recognized by Parent, the Company or Merger Sub as a result of the Merger, (iv) no gain or loss will be recognized by U.S. stockholders of the Company with respect to shares of Company Common Stock that are exchanged solely for Parent Common Stock in the Merger, except with respect to the amount of cash received instead of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock by U.S. stockholders of Company Common Stock; (v) no gain or loss should be recognized by U.S. stockholders of the Company with respect to shares of Series A Preferred Stock that are exchanged solely for Parent Common Stock in the Merger, except with respect to any cash received by any Dissenting Stockholder, and (vi) no gain or loss will be recognized by non-U.S. stockholders of the Company with respect to shares of Company Common Stock that are exchanged solely for Parent Common Stock in the Merger, provided such non-U.S. stockholders have not held (either directly or indirectly, after the application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318 of the Code as modified by Section 897(c)(6)(C) of the Code) more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock at any time during the shorter of (1) the five-year period ending at the Effective Time of the Merger or (2) the period during which such non-U.S. stockholders held such shares of Company Common Stock, and such opinion shall not have been withdrawn, revoked or modified. Such opinion may be based upon customary assumptions and on representations of the Parties and stockholders of the Parties. If the Company does not receive such opinion from such
A-82
counsel, Parent has the right to provide such opinion from its counsel, and if so provided, then the condition contained in this Section 6.3(c) shall be deemed to have been satisfied."
Section 1.2 General. All references to the "Agreement" in the Merger Agreement shall mean the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all provisions of the Merger Agreement remain unmodified and in full force and effect. This Amendment shall be effective as of April 20, 2005.
ARTICLE 2
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 2.1 Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Merger Agreement.
Section 2.2 Applicable Law. This Amendment shall be governed in all respects, including validity, interpretation and effect, by the laws of the State of Delaware regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
Section 2.3 Descriptive Headings. The descriptive headings herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Amendment.
Section 2.4 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Parties, it being understood that all Parties need not sign the same counterpart.
[Signature Page Follows]
A-83
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, on the date first written above.
"Company" MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC. |
"Parent" CIMAREX ENERGY CO. |
|||||
By: |
/s/ RICHARD R. FRAZIER |
By: |
/s/ F.H. MERELLI |
|||
| Name: | Richard R. Frazier | Name: | F.H. Merelli | |||
| Title: | President and CEO | Title: | Chairman, CEO and President | |||
"Merger Sub" CIMAREX NEVADA ACQUISITION CO. |
||||||
By: |
/s/ F.H. MERELLI |
|||||
| Name: | F.H. Merelli | |||||
| Title: | Chairman, CEO and President | |||||
A-84
[LETTERHEAD OF LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.]
January 25, 2005
Board
of Directors
Cimarex Energy Co.
1700 Lincoln Street
Suite 1800
Denver, Colorado 80203
Members of the Board:
We understand that Cimarex Energy Co. ("Cimarex") and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. ("Magnum Hunter") are considering entering into a transaction (the "Proposed Transaction") pursuant to which (i) Magnum Hunter will merge with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cimarex (the "Merger") and (ii) upon effectiveness of the Merger, each share of common stock of Magnum Hunter will be converted into the right to receive 0.415 shares of the common stock of Cimarex (the "Exchange Ratio"). We further understand that prior to the Merger, Magnum Hunter will distribute the units of beneficial interests it holds of the publicly-traded TEL Offshore Trust to its shareholders in the form of a dividend. The terms and conditions of the Merger are set forth in more detail in the draft Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 24, 2005, among Cimarex, Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co. and Magnum Hunter (the "Agreement").
We have been requested by the Board of Directors of Cimarex to render our opinion with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Cimarex of the Exchange Ratio to be paid by Cimarex in the Merger. We have not been requested to opine as to, and our opinion does not in any manner address, Cimarex's underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the Proposed Transaction.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed and analyzed: (1) the Agreement and its schedules, and the specific terms of the Merger; (2) publicly available information concerning Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that we believe to be relevant to our analysis, including, without limitation, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the nine-months ended September 30, 2004 for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter; (3) financial and operating information with respect to the respective businesses, operations and prospects of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as furnished to us by Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively; (4) estimates of proved and non-proved reserves generated internally at each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter (the "Internal Reserve Estimates"), third-party reserve reports for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as of December 31, 2003 (the "Third Party Reserve Reports"), and projected future production, revenue, operating costs and capital investments for each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter provided to us by the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively (the "Projected Metrics"); (5) the trading histories of Cimarex common stock and Magnum Hunter common stock from January 22, 2004 to January 21, 2005 and a comparison of those trading histories with each other and with those of other companies that we deemed relevant; (6) a comparison of the historical financial results and present financial condition of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter with each other and with those of other companies that we deemed relevant; (7) a comparison of the financial terms of the Merger with the financial terms of certain other transactions that we deemed relevant; (8) the pro forma impact of the Merger on the future financial performance of Cimarex; (9) the relative contributions of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter to the current and future financial performance of the combined company on a pro forma basis; and (10) published estimates of independent equity research analysts (including Lehman Brothers') with respect to the future financial performance of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter. In addition, we have (i) had discussions with the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter concerning (a) their respective businesses, operations,
B-1
assets, financial conditions, reserves, production profiles, hedging levels, exploration programs and prospects and (b) strategic benefits to Cimarex of the Merger and (ii) undertaken such other studies, analyses and investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information used by us without assuming any responsibility for independent verification of such information and have further relied upon the assurances of the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. We have not been provided with, and did not have access to, financial projections of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter prepared by the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively. Accordingly, upon advice of Cimarex, we have assumed that the published estimates of independent equity research analysts are a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the future financial performance of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, and that each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter will perform substantially in accordance with such estimates. Upon advice of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, we have assumed that (i) the Internal Reserve Estimates and the Projected Metrics have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter, respectively, and that the Internal Reserve Estimates and the Projected Metrics will be realized substantially in accordance therewith, and (ii) the Third Party Reserve Reports are a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the reserve balances at each of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter as of December 31, 2003. In addition, upon the direction of Cimarex, we have not analyzed the merits or the amounts of any actual or potential contingent liabilities of Magnum Hunter or factored them into our analysis in arriving at our opinion. In arriving at our opinion, we have not conducted a physical inspection of the properties and facilities of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter and have not made or obtained from third parties any evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter other than the Third Party Reserve Reports. Upon advice of Cimarex and its legal and accounting advisors, we have assumed that the Merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and therefore as a tax-free transaction to the stockholders of Cimarex. Our opinion necessarily is based upon market, economic and other conditions as they exist on, and can be evaluated as of, the date of this letter. In addition, we express no opinion as to the price at which shares of common stock of Cimarex or Magnum Hunter actually will trade following announcement of the Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion as of the date hereof that, from a financial point of view, the Exchange Ratio to be paid by Cimarex in the Merger is fair to Cimarex.
We have been retained by Cimarex solely to render our opinion in connection with the Proposed Transaction and will receive a fee for our services, a portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In addition, Cimarex has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of the rendering of this opinion. We also have performed various investment banking services for Magnum Hunter in the past and have received customary fees for such services. In the ordinary course of our business, we actively trade in the debt and equity securities of Cimarex and Magnum Hunter for our own account and for the accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board of Directors of Cimarex and is rendered to the Board of Directors in connection with its consideration of the Merger. This opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Cimarex or shareholder of Magnum Hunter as to how such stockholder or shareholder should vote with respect to the Merger.
| Very truly yours, | ||
/s/ LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. |
B-2
[LETTERHEAD OF DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.]
January 25, 2005
Board
of Directors
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
600 East Las Colinas Blvd
Dallas, Texas 75039
Gentlemen:
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("Deutsche Bank") has acted as financial advisor to Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. ("Magnum Hunter" or the "Company") in connection with the proposed combination of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex Energy Co. ("Cimarex") pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2005, among Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex ("Cimarex Merger Sub") (the "Merger Agreement"), which provides, among other things, for the merger of Cimarex Merger Sub with and into Magnum Hunter (the "Transaction"), as a result of which Magnum Hunter will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Cimarex. As set forth more fully in the Merger Agreement, as a result of the Transaction, each share of the Common Stock, par value $0.002 per share, of the Company ("Company Common Stock") other than Magnum Hunter treasury stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.415 shares (the "Exchange Ratio") of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Cimarex ("Cimarex Common Stock"). The terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully set forth in the Merger Agreement.
You have requested Deutsche Bank's opinion, as investment bankers, as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the Company Common Stock of the Exchange Ratio.
In connection with Deutsche Bank's role as financial advisor to Magnum Hunter, and in arriving at its opinion, Deutsche Bank has reviewed certain publicly available financial and other information concerning the Company and Cimarex and certain internal analyses and other information furnished to it by the Company and Cimarex. Deutsche Bank has also held discussions with members of the senior managements of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex regarding the businesses and prospects of their respective companies and the joint prospects of a combined company. In addition, Deutsche Bank has (i) reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for Magnum Hunter Common Stock and Cimarex Common Stock, (ii) compared certain financial and stock market information for the Company and Cimarex with similar information for certain other companies whose securities are publicly traded, (iii) reviewed the financial terms of certain recent business combinations which it deemed comparable in whole or in part, (iv) reviewed the terms of the Merger Agreement and certain related documents, and (v) performed such other studies and analyses and considered such other factors as it deemed appropriate.
Deutsche Bank has not assumed responsibility for independent verification of, and has not independently verified, any information, whether publicly available or furnished to it, concerning Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, including, without limitation, any financial information, forecasts or projections considered in connection with the rendering of its opinion. Accordingly, for purposes of its opinion, Deutsche Bank has assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and Deutsche Bank has not conducted a physical inspection of any of the properties or assets, and has not prepared or obtained any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities, of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex. With respect to the financial forecasts and projections, including the analyses and forecasts of certain cost savings, operating efficiencies, revenue effects and financial synergies expected by Magnum Hunter and Cimarex to be achieved as a result of the
C-1
Transaction (collectively, the "Synergies"), made available to Deutsche Bank and used in its analyses, Deutsche Bank has assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Magnum Hunter or Cimarex, as the case may be, as to the matters covered thereby. In rendering its opinion, Deutsche Bank expresses no view as to the reasonableness of such forecasts and projections, including the Synergies, or the assumptions on which they are based. Deutsche Bank's opinion is necessarily based upon economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to it as of, the date hereof.
For purposes of rendering its opinion, Deutsche Bank has assumed that, in all respects material to its analysis, the representations and warranties of Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Cimarex Merger Sub contained in the Merger Agreement are true and correct, Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Cimarex Merger Sub will each perform all of the covenants and agreements to be performed by it under the Merger Agreement and all conditions to the obligations of each of Magnum Hunter, Cimarex and Cimarex Merger Sub to consummate the Transaction will be satisfied without any waiver thereof. Deutsche Bank has also assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other approvals and consents required in connection with the consummation of the Transaction will be obtained and that in connection with obtaining any necessary governmental, regulatory or other approvals and consents, or any amendments, modifications or waivers to any agreements, instruments or orders to which either Magnum Hunter or Cimarex is a party or is subject or by which it is bound, no limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would have a material adverse effect on Magnum Hunter or Cimarex or materially reduce the contemplated benefits of the Transaction to Magnum Hunter or the holders of the Company Common Stock. In addition, you have informed Deutsche Bank, and accordingly for purposes of rendering its opinion Deutsche Bank has assumed, that the Transaction will be tax-free to each of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex and their respective stockholders.
Deutsche Bank does not express any opinion as to the price or range of prices at which the Company Common Stock or the Cimarex Common Stock may trade subsequent to the announcement of the Transaction or as to the price or range of prices at which the Cimarex Common Stock may trade subsequent to the consummation of the Transaction.
This opinion is addressed to, and for the use and benefit of, the Board of Directors of Magnum Hunter and is not a recommendation to the stockholders of Magnum Hunter to approve the Transaction. This opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the Company Common Stock of the Exchange Ratio, and Deutsche Bank expresses no opinion as to the merits of the underlying decision by Magnum Hunter to engage in the Transaction.
Deutsche Bank will be paid a fee for its services as financial advisor to Magnum Hunter in connection with the Transaction, all of which is contingent upon consummation of the Transaction. We are an affiliate of Deutsche Bank AG (together with its affiliates, the "DB Group"). One or more members of the DB Group have, from time to time, provided investment banking, commercial banking (including extension of credit) and other financial services to Magnum Hunter and Cimarex or their affiliates for which it has received compensation. In the ordinary course of business, members of the DB Group may actively trade in the securities and other instruments and obligations of Magnum Hunter and Cimarex for their own accounts and for the accounts of their customers. Accordingly, the DB Group may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities, instruments and obligations.
C-2
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is Deutsche Bank's opinion as of the date hereof as investment bankers that the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the Company Common Stock.
| Very truly yours, | ||
/s/ DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC. |
||
DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC. |
C-3
January 25, 2005
Board
of Directors
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
600 East Las Colinas Blvd, Suite 1100
Irving, TX 75039
Members of the Board of Directors:
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), Cimarex Energy Co. (the "Acquiror") and Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (the "Acquisition Sub"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 25, 2005 (the "Agreement") pursuant to which the Acquisition Sub will be merged with the Company in a transaction (the "Merger") in which each outstanding share of the Company's common stock, par value $.002 per share (the "Company Shares"), will be converted into the right to receive 0.415 shares (the "Exchange Ratio") of the common stock of the Acquiror, par value $.01 per share (the "Acquiror Shares").
You have asked us whether, in our opinion, the Exchange Ratio is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of the Company Shares.
In arriving at the opinion set forth below, we have, among other things:
- (1)
- Reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information relating to the Company and the Acquiror that we deemed to be relevant;
- (2)
- Reviewed
certain information, including financial forecasts, relating to the business, earnings, cash flow, assets, liabilities and prospects of the Company and the Acquiror furnished
to us by the Company and the Acquiror, respectively;
- (3)
- Reviewed
certain proved reserve data of the Company and the Acquiror as well as information relating to potential future drilling sites and the probable and possible reserves;
- (4)
- Conducted
discussions with members of senior management and representatives of the Company and the Acquiror concerning the matters described in clauses 1, 2 and 3 above, as well as
their respective businesses and prospects before and after giving effect to the Merger;
- (5)
- Reviewed
the market prices and valuation multiples for the Company Shares and the Acquiror Shares and compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies that we deemed to
be relevant;
- (6)
- Reviewed
the results of operations of the Company and the Acquiror and compared them with those of certain publicly traded companies that we deemed to be relevant;
- (7)
- Compared
the proposed financial terms of the Merger with the financial terms of certain other transactions that we deemed to be relevant;
- (8)
- Participated
in certain discussions and negotiations among representatives of the Company and the Acquiror and their financial and legal advisors;
- (9)
- Reviewed the potential pro forma impact of the Merger;
D-1
- (10)
- Reviewed
the Agreement; and
- (11)
- Reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and took into account such other matters as we deemed necessary, including our assessment of general economic, market and monetary conditions.
In preparing our opinion, we have assumed and relied on the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made available to us, discussed with or reviewed by or for us, or publicly available, and we have not assumed any responsibility for independently verifying such information or undertaken an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of the Company or the Acquiror or been furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal (other than reserve data referred to herein), nor have we evaluated the solvency or fair value of the Company or the Acquiror under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In addition, we have not assumed any obligation to conduct any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of the Company or the Acquiror. With respect to the financial forecast information furnished to or discussed with us by the Company or the Acquiror, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared and reflect the best currently available estimates and judgment of the Company's or the Acquiror's management as to the expected future financial performance of the Company or the Acquiror, as the case may be. We have further assumed that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on, and on the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. We have assumed that in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or other consents or approvals (contractual or otherwise) for the Merger, no restrictions, including any divestiture requirements or amendments or modifications, will be imposed that will have a material adverse effect on the contemplated benefits of the Merger.
We are acting as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee from the Company for our services contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. We have, in the past, provided financial advisory services to the Company and the Acquiror and may continue to do so and have received, and may receive, fees for the rendering of such services. In addition, in the ordinary course of our business, we may actively trade the Company Shares and other securities of the Company, as well as the Acquiror Shares and other securities of the Acquiror, for our own account and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board of Directors of the Company. Our opinion does not address the merits of the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote on the proposed Merger or any matter related thereto. In addition, you have not asked us to address, and this opinion does not address, the fairness to, or any other consideration of, the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company, other than the holders of the Company Shares.
We are not expressing any opinion herein as to the prices at which the Company Shares or the Acquiror Shares will trade following the announcement or consummation of the Merger.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of the Company Shares.
| Very truly yours, | ||
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH |
||
| INCORPORATED |
D-2
STOCKHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT
THIS STOCKHOLDER VOTING AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made, entered into, and effective as of January 25, 2005 by and among Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Cimarex"), and the persons listed on Schedule A(Stockholders) to this Agreement (each, a "Stockholder" and, collectively, the "Stockholders").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Cimarex, Cimarex Nevada Acquisition Co., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cimarex ("Merger Sub"), and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Magnum"), are entering into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), which provides, among other things, for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Magnum (the "Merger"), all on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement; and
WHEREAS, as an inducement and a condition to entering into the Merger Agreement, Cimarex has required that each Stockholder agree, and each Stockholder has agreed, to enter into this Agreement;
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in and as consideration of and for the foregoing premises and the representations, warranties, agreements, and covenants contained in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
1. Definitions. Any and all capitalized terms used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the meaning(s) assigned to such term(s) in the Merger Agreement which is incorporated herein by reference.
2. Voting. Unless and until this Agreement is terminated:
(a) Each Stockholder shall, at each meeting of the stockholders of Magnum, if any, however called, or in connection with each written consent of the stockholders of Magnum, if any, vote (or cause to be voted) all shares of Company Common Stock then held of record and/or beneficially owned by such Stockholder (the "Shares") (to the extent such Stockholder has the right to vote or direct the voting of such Shares), (i) in favor of the Merger, the execution and delivery by Magnum of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the terms thereof and each of the other actions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and this Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof and hereof and (ii) against any proposal relating to a Superior Proposal and against any action or agreement that would impede, frustrate, prevent, or nullify this Agreement, or result in a breach in any respect of any covenant, representation, or warranty or any other obligation or agreement of Magnum under the Merger Agreement or which would result in any of the conditions set forth in Article VI of the Merger Agreement not being fulfilled.
(b) Each Stockholder hereby covenants and agrees that, except as contemplated by this Agreement and/or the Merger Agreement, such Stockholder shall not (i) offer to transfer (which term shall include, without limitation, any sale, tender, gift, pledge, assignment or other disposition), transfer, or consent to any transfer of, any of the Shares beneficially owned by such Stockholder (to the extent such Stockholder has the right to dispose of or direct the disposition of such Shares) or any interest therein without the prior written consent of Cimarex, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed in the case of a gift or similar estate planning transaction (it being understood that Cimarex may decline to consent to any such transfer if the
E-1
person acquiring such Shares does not agree to take such Shares subject to the terms of this Agreement), (ii) enter into any contract, option, or other agreement or understanding with respect to any transfer of any such Shares or any interest therein, (iii) grant any proxy, power-of-attorney, or other authorization or consent in or with respect to any such Shares (other than pursuant to and in accordance with this Agreement), (iv) deposit any such Shares into a voting trust or enter into a voting agreement or arrangement with respect to any such Shares (other than pursuant to and in accordance with this Agreement), or (v) take any other action that would make any representation or warranty of such Stockholder contained herein untrue or incorrect in any material respect or in any way restrict, limit, or interfere in any material respect with the performance of the obligations of such Stockholder hereunder or the transactions contemplated hereby or by the Merger Agreement.
(c) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, each of the parties hereto agrees to use all commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper, and/or advisable under applicable laws to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Each party hereto shall promptly consult with the other parties hereto and provide any necessary information and material with respect to all filings made by any party hereto with any Governmental Authority in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.
(d) Each Stockholder hereby waives any rights of appraisal or rights to dissent from the Merger that such Stockholder may have.
3. Representations and Warranties of Each Stockholder. Each Stockholder hereby represents and warrants, severally and not jointly, to Cimarex as follows:
(a) Ownership of Shares. Such Stockholder is the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which meaning shall apply for all purposes of this Agreement) of, and has the sole power to vote and dispose of, the number of Shares set forth opposite the name of such Stockholder on Schedule A (Stockholders) hereto and is the beneficial owner of options and/or warrants (collectively, the "Options") to purchase the number of shares of Company Common Stock set forth opposite the name of such Stockholder on Schedule A (Stockholders) hereto, in each case, free and clear of any security interests, liens, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, options or limitations of whatever nature and free of any other limitation or restriction (including, without limitation, any restriction on the right to vote, sell, or otherwise dispose of such Shares or Options), except, in each case, as may exist by reason of this Agreement or pursuant to applicable law or, in the case of the Options, the restrictions on transferability and/or on exercise or purchase provided for in the applicable option or warrant agreement and/or any related plan, as applicable. The number of Shares and Options set forth opposite the name of such Stockholder on Schedule A (Stockholders) hereto represents all of the shares of capital stock of Magnum beneficially owned by such Stockholder as of the date of this Agreement.
(b) Such Stockholder has the power and authority to enter into and perform all of such Stockholder's obligations under this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by such Stockholder and, assuming due execution and delivery by, and enforceability against, Cimarex, constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of such Stockholder, enforceable against such Stockholder in accordance with its terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by any equitable defense. There is no beneficiary or holder of a voting trust certificate or other interest of any trust of which such Stockholder is a trustee, or any party to any other agreement or arrangement, whose consent is required for the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated thereby.
E-2
(c) No filing with, and no permit, authorization, consent or approval of, any Governmental Authority is necessary for the execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder, the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated hereby and the compliance by such Stockholder with the provisions hereof and none of the execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder, the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated hereby or compliance by such Stockholder with any of the provisions hereof, except in cases in which any conflict, breach, default or violation described below would not interfere with the ability of such Stockholder to perform such Stockholder's obligations hereunder, shall (i) conflict with or result in any breach of any organizational documents applicable to such Stockholder, (ii) result in a violation or breach of, or constitute (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) a default (or give rise to any third party right of termination, cancellation, modification or acceleration) under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, loan agreement, bond, mortgage, indenture, license, contract, commitment, arrangement, understanding, agreement or other instrument or obligation of any kind, including, without limitation, any voting agreement, proxy arrangement, pledge agreement, stockholders agreement or voting trust, to which such Stockholder is a party or by which such Stockholder or any properties or assets of such Stockholder may be bound, or (iii) violate any order, writ, injunction, decree, judgment, order, statute, rule or regulation applicable to such Stockholder or any properties or assets of such Stockholder.
(d) Except as permitted by this Agreement, the Shares beneficially owned by such Stockholder and the certificates representing such Shares are now, and at all times during the term hereof shall be, held by such Stockholder, or by a nominee or custodian for the benefit of such Stockholder, free and clear of all liens, proxies, voting trusts or agreements, understandings or arrangements or any other rights whatsoever, except for any such liens or proxies arising hereunder. The transfer by such Stockholder of the Shares to Cimarex in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement shall pass to and unconditionally vest in Cimarex good and valid title to all such Shares, free and clear of all liens, proxies, voting trusts or agreements, understandings or arrangements or any other rights whatsoever.
(e) No broker, investment banker, financial advisor or other person is entitled to any broker's, finder's, financial advisor's or other similar fee or commission in connection with, or as a result of, the execution of this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of such Stockholder.
4. Stop Transfer. Each Stockholder shall request that Magnum not register the transfer (book-entry or otherwise) of any certificate or uncertificated interest representing any of the Shares beneficially owned by such Stockholder, unless such transfer is made in compliance with this Agreement.
5. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate with respect to each Stockholder upon the earliest of (a) the Effective Time, (b) the termination of the Merger Agreement, and (c) July 25, 2005 (which date shall automatically be extended to October 1, 2005 in the event that the SEC has not declared the Registration Statement effective by June 1, 2005).
6. No Limitation. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prohibit any Stockholder, or any officer or affiliate of any Stockholder that is or has been designated as a member of the Board of Directors of Magnum, from taking any action solely in his or her capacity as a member of the Board of Directors of Magnum or from exercising his or her fiduciary duties as a member of such Board of Directors to the extent specifically permitted by the Merger Agreement.
E-3
7. Miscellaneous.
(a) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.
(b) This Agreement shall not be assigned by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of each Stockholder (in the case of an assignment by Cimarex) or Cimarex (in the case of an assignment by any Stockholder); provided, however, that Cimarex may assign the rights and obligations of Cimarex hereunder to any subsidiary of Cimarex, but no such assignment shall relieve Cimarex of the obligations of Cimarex hereunder.
(c) Without limiting any other rights Cimarex may have hereunder in respect of any transfer of any Shares, each Stockholder agrees that this Agreement and the obligations hereunder shall attach to the Shares beneficially owned by such Stockholder and shall be binding upon any person to which legal or beneficial ownership of such Shares shall pass, whether by operation of law or otherwise, including, without limitation, such Stockholder's heirs, guardians, administrators or successors.
(d) This Agreement may not be amended, changed, supplemented or otherwise modified with respect to any Stockholder except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such Stockholder and Cimarex.
(e) All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given (and shall be deemed to have been duly received if given) by hand delivery or by facsimile transmission with confirmation of receipt, as follows:
If to Cimarex:
Cimarex
Energy Co.
1700 Lincoln, Suite 1800
Denver, Colorado 80203
Attention: Paul Korus
Fax: 303.295.3494
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Holme
Roberts & Owen LLP
1700 Lincoln, Suite 4100
Denver, Colorado 80203
Attention: Thomas A. Richardson and J. Gregory Holloway
Fax: 303.866.0200 and 303.866.0200
If to a Stockholder:
At the addresses and facsimile numbers set forth on Schedule A hereto.
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Haynes
and Boone, LLP
901 Main Street, Suite 3100
Dallas, Texas 75202-3789
Attention: Greg R. Samuel, Esq.
Fax: 214.200.0577
or to such other address or facsimile number as the person to whom notice is given may have previously furnished to the other parties hereto in writing in the manner set forth above.
(f) Whenever possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law but if any provision or
E-4
portion of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion of any provision had never been contained herein.
(g) All rights, powers and remedies provided under this Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at law or in equity shall be cumulative and not alternative, and the exercise of any thereof by any party shall not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise of any other such right, power or remedy by such party.
(h) The failure of any party hereto to exercise any right, power or remedy provided under this Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at law or in equity, or to insist upon compliance by any other party hereto with its obligations hereunder, and any custom or practice of the parties at variance with the terms hereof, shall not constitute a waiver by such party of its right to exercise any such or other right, power or remedy or to demand such compliance.
(i) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure solely to the benefit of each party hereto, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any other person any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.
(j) This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.
(k) The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement in any Delaware state court located in the City of Wilmington or any Federal court located in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. In addition, each of the parties hereto (i) consents to submit itself to the personal jurisdiction of any Delaware state court located in the City of Wilmington or any Federal court located in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware in the event any dispute arises out of this Agreement or any transaction contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) agrees that it shall not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from any such court and (iii) agrees that it shall not bring any action relating to this Agreement or any transaction contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than any such court. The parties hereto irrevocably and unconditionally waive any objection to the laying of venue of any action, suit or proceeding arising out of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby in the courts of the State of Delaware located in the City of Wilmington or in any Federal court located in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, and hereby further irrevocably and unconditionally waive and agree not to plead or claim in any such court that any such action, suit or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in a inconvenient forum.
(l) The descriptive headings used herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
(m) This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (by fax or otherwise), each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement.
(n) Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall pay its, his or her own expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement.
Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank. Signature Page(s) to Follow.
E-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Stockholder Voting Agreement effective as of the date first written above.
Cimarex: |
||||
Cimarex Energy Co. |
||||
By: |
/s/ PAUL KORUS |
|||
| Name: | Paul Korus | |||
| Title: | Vice President and CFO | |||
Stockholders: |
||||
/s/ GARY C. EVANS Gary C. Evans |
||||
Jacquelyn Evelyn Enterprises, Inc. |
||||
By: |
/s/ GARY C. EVANS |
|||
| Name: | Gary C. Evans | |||
| Title: | Secretary | |||
E-6
Rights of Dissenting Owners
NRS 92A.300 Definitions. As used in NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 92A.305 to 92A.335, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2086)
NRS 92A.305 "Beneficial stockholder" defined. "Beneficial stockholder" means a person who is a beneficial owner of shares held in a voting trust or by a nominee as the stockholder of record.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.310 "Corporate action" defined. "Corporate action" means the action of a domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.315 "Dissenter" defined. "Dissenter" means a stockholder who is entitled to dissent from a domestic corporation's action under NRS 92A.380 and who exercises that right when and in the manner required by NRS 92A.400 to 92A.480, inclusive.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087; A 1999, 1631)
NRS 92A.320 "Fair value" defined. "Fair value," with respect to a dissenter's shares, means the value of the shares immediately before the effectuation of the corporate action to which he objects, excluding any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the corporate action unless exclusion would be inequitable.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.325 "Stockholder" defined. "Stockholder" means a stockholder of record or a beneficial stockholder of a domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.330 "Stockholder of record" defined. "Stockholder of record" means the person in whose name shares are registered in the records of a domestic corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of the rights granted by a nominee's certificate on file with the domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.335 "Subject corporation" defined. "Subject corporation" means the domestic corporation which is the issuer of the shares held by a dissenter before the corporate action creating the dissenter's rights becomes effective or the surviving or acquiring entity of that issuer after the corporate action becomes effective.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.340 Computation of interest. Interest payable pursuant to NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, must be computed from the effective date of the action until the date of payment, at the average rate currently paid by the entity on its principal bank loans or, if it has no bank loans, at a rate that is fair and equitable under all of the circumstances.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
F-1
NRS 92A.350 Rights of dissenting partner of domestic limited partnership. A partnership agreement of a domestic limited partnership or, unless otherwise provided in the partnership agreement, an agreement of merger or exchange, may provide that contractual rights with respect to the partnership interest of a dissenting general or limited partner of a domestic limited partnership are available for any class or group of partnership interests in connection with any merger or exchange in which the domestic limited partnership is a constituent entity.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.360 Rights of dissenting member of domestic limited-liability company. The articles of organization or operating agreement of a domestic limited-liability company or, unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or operating agreement, an agreement of merger or exchange, may provide that contractual rights with respect to the interest of a dissenting member are available in connection with any merger or exchange in which the domestic limited-liability company is a constituent entity.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.370 Rights of dissenting member of domestic nonprofit corporation.
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, and unless otherwise provided in the articles or bylaws, any member of any constituent domestic nonprofit corporation who voted against the merger may, without advance notice, but within 30 days after the effective date of the merger, resign from membership and is thereby excused from all contractual obligations to the constituent or surviving corporations which did not occur before his resignation and is thereby entitled to those rights, if any, which would have existed if there had been no merger and the membership had been terminated or the member had been expelled.
2. Unless otherwise provided in its articles of incorporation or bylaws, no member of a domestic nonprofit corporation, including, but not limited to, a cooperative corporation, which supplies services described in chapter 704 of NRS to its members only, and no person who is a member of a domestic nonprofit corporation as a condition of or by reason of the ownership of an interest in real property, may resign and dissent pursuant to subsection 1.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.380 Right of stockholder to dissent from certain corporate actions and to obtain payment for shares.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 92A.370 and 92A.390, any stockholder is entitled to dissent from, and obtain payment of the fair value of his shares in the event of any of the following corporate actions:
(a) Consummation of a conversion or plan of merger to which the domestic corporation is a constituent entity:
(1) If approval by the stockholders is required for the conversion or merger by NRS 92A.120 to 92A.160, inclusive, or the articles of incorporation, regardless of whether the stockholder is entitled to vote on the conversion or plan of merger; or
(2) If the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent pursuant to NRS 92A.180.
(b) Consummation of a plan of exchange to which the domestic corporation is a constituent entity as the corporation whose subject owner's interests will be acquired, if his shares are to be acquired in the plan of exchange.
F-2
(c) Any corporate action taken pursuant to a vote of the stockholders to the extent that the articles of incorporation, bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors provides that voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for their shares.
2. A stockholder who is entitled to dissent and obtain payment pursuant to NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, may not challenge the corporate action creating his entitlement unless the action is unlawful or fraudulent with respect to him or the domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087; A 2001, 1414, 3199; 2003, 3189)
NRS 92A.390 Limitations on right of dissent: Stockholders of certain classes or series; action of stockholders not required for plan of merger.
1. There is no right of dissent with respect to a plan of merger or exchange in favor of stockholders of any class or series which, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting at which the plan of merger or exchange is to be acted on, were either listed on a national securities exchange, included in the national market system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held by at least 2,000 stockholders of record, unless:
(a) The articles of incorporation of the corporation issuing the shares provide otherwise; or
(b) The holders of the class or series are required under the plan of merger or exchange to accept for the shares anything except:
(1) Cash, owner's interests or owner's interests and cash in lieu of fractional owner's interests of:
(I) The surviving or acquiring entity; or
(II) Any other entity which, at the effective date of the plan of merger or exchange, were either listed on a national securities exchange, included in the national market system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held of record by a least 2,000 holders of owner's interests of record; or
(2) A combination of cash and owner's interests of the kind described in sub-subparagraphs (I) and (II) of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b).
2. There is no right of dissent for any holders of stock of the surviving domestic corporation if the plan of merger does not require action of the stockholders of the surviving domestic corporation under NRS 92A.130.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.400 Limitations on right of dissent: Assertion as to portions only to shares registered to stockholder; assertion by beneficial stockholder.
1. A stockholder of record may assert dissenter's rights as to fewer than all of the shares registered in his name only if he dissents with respect to all shares beneficially owned by any one person and notifies the subject corporation in writing of the name and address of each person on whose behalf he asserts dissenter's rights. The rights of a partial dissenter under this subsection are determined as if the shares as to which he dissents and his other shares were registered in the names of different stockholders.
2. A beneficial stockholder may assert dissenter's rights as to shares held on his behalf only if:
(a) He submits to the subject corporation the written consent of the stockholder of record to the dissent not later than the time the beneficial stockholder asserts dissenter's rights; and
F-3
(b) He does so with respect to all shares of which he is the beneficial stockholder or over which he has power to direct the vote.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089)
NRS 92A.410 Notification of stockholders regarding right of dissent.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights is submitted to a vote at a stockholders' meeting, the notice of the meeting must state that stockholders are or may be entitled to assert dissenters' rights under NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, and be accompanied by a copy of those sections.
2. If the corporate action creating dissenters' rights is taken by written consent of the stockholders or without a vote of the stockholders, the domestic corporation shall notify in writing all stockholders entitled to assert dissenters' rights that the action was taken and send them the dissenter's notice described in NRS 92A.430.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089; A 1997, 730)
NRS 92A.420 Prerequisites to demand for payment for shares.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights is submitted to a vote at a stockholders' meeting, a stockholder who wishes to assert dissenter's rights:
(a) Must deliver to the subject corporation, before the vote is taken, written notice of his intent to demand payment for his shares if the proposed action is effectuated; and
(b) Must not vote his shares in favor of the proposed action.
2. A stockholder who does not satisfy the requirements of subsection 1 and NRS 92A.400 is not entitled to payment for his shares under this chapter.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089; 1999, 1631)
NRS 92A.430 Dissenter's notice: Delivery to stockholders entitled to assert rights; contents.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights is authorized at a stockholders' meeting, the subject corporation shall deliver a written dissenter's notice to all stockholders who satisfied the requirements to assert those rights.
2. The dissenter's notice must be sent no later than 10 days after the effectuation of the corporate action, and must:
(a) State where the demand for payment must be sent and where and when certificates, if any, for shares must be deposited;
(b) Inform the holders of shares not represented by certificates to what extent the transfer of the shares will be restricted after the demand for payment is received;
(c) Supply a form for demanding payment that includes the date of the first announcement to the news media or to the stockholders of the terms of the proposed action and requires that the person asserting dissenter's rights certify whether or not he acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before that date;
(d) Set a date by which the subject corporation must receive the demand for payment, which may not be less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the date the notice is delivered; and
(e) Be accompanied by a copy of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089)
F-4
NRS 92A.440 Demand for payment and deposit of certificates; retention of rights of stockholder.
1. A stockholder to whom a dissenter's notice is sent must:
(a) Demand payment;
(b) Certify whether he or the beneficial owner on whose behalf he is dissenting, as the case may be, acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before the date required to be set forth in the dissenter's notice for this certification; and
(c) Deposit his certificates, if any, in accordance with the terms of the notice.
2. The stockholder who demands payment and deposits his certificates, if any, before the proposed corporate action is taken retains all other rights of a stockholder until those rights are cancelled or modified by the taking of the proposed corporate action.
3. The stockholder who does not demand payment or deposit his certificates where required, each by the date set forth in the dissenter's notice, is not entitled to payment for his shares under this chapter.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2090; A 1997, 730; 2003, 3189)
NRS 92A.450 Uncertificated shares: Authority to restrict transfer after demand for payment; retention of rights of stockholder.
1. The subject corporation may restrict the transfer of shares not represented by a certificate from the date the demand for their payment is received.
2. The person for whom dissenter's rights are asserted as to shares not represented by a certificate retains all other rights of a stockholder until those rights are cancelled or modified by the taking of the proposed corporate action.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2090)
NRS 92A.460 Payment for shares: General requirements.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 92A.470, within 30 days after receipt of a demand for payment, the subject corporation shall pay each dissenter who complied with NRS 92A.440 the amount the subject corporation estimates to be the fair value of his shares, plus accrued interest. The obligation of the subject corporation under this subsection may be enforced by the district court:
(a) Of the county where the corporation's registered office is located; or
(b) At the election of any dissenter residing or having its registered office in this state, of the county where the dissenter resides or has its registered office. The court shall dispose of the complaint promptly.
2. The payment must be accompanied by:
(a) The subject corporation's balance sheet as of the end of a fiscal year ending not more than 16 months before the date of payment, a statement of income for that year, a statement of changes in the stockholders' equity for that year and the latest available interim financial statements, if any;
(b) A statement of the subject corporation's estimate of the fair value of the shares;
(c) An explanation of how the interest was calculated;
(d) A statement of the dissenter's rights to demand payment under NRS 92A.480; and
(e) A copy of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.
F-5
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2090)
NRS 92A.470 Payment for shares: Shares acquired on or after date of dissenter's notice.
1. A subject corporation may elect to withhold payment from a dissenter unless he was the beneficial owner of the shares before the date set forth in the dissenter's notice as the date of the first announcement to the news media or to the stockholders of the terms of the proposed action.
2. To the extent the subject corporation elects to withhold payment, after taking the proposed action, it shall estimate the fair value of the shares, plus accrued interest, and shall offer to pay this amount to each dissenter who agrees to accept it in full satisfaction of his demand. The subject corporation shall send with its offer a statement of its estimate of the fair value of the shares, an explanation of how the interest was calculated, and a statement of the dissenters' right to demand payment pursuant to NRS 92A.480.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS 92A.480 Dissenter's estimate of fair value: Notification of subject corporation; demand for payment of estimate.
1. A dissenter may notify the subject corporation in writing of his own estimate of the fair value of his shares and the amount of interest due, and demand payment of his estimate, less any payment pursuant to NRS 92A.460, or reject the offer pursuant to NRS 92A.470 and demand payment of the fair value of his shares and interest due, if he believes that the amount paid pursuant to NRS 92A.460 or offered pursuant to NRS 92A.470 is less than the fair value of his shares or that the interest due is incorrectly calculated.
2. A dissenter waives his right to demand payment pursuant to this section unless he notifies the subject corporation of his demand in writing within 30 days after the subject corporation made or offered payment for his shares.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS 92A.490 Legal proceeding to determine fair value: Duties of subject corporation; powers of court; rights of dissenter.
1. If a demand for payment remains unsettled, the subject corporation shall commence a proceeding within 60 days after receiving the demand and petition the court to determine the fair value of the shares and accrued interest. If the subject corporation does not commence the proceeding within the 60-day period, it shall pay each dissenter whose demand remains unsettled the amount demanded.
2. A subject corporation shall commence the proceeding in the district court of the county where its registered office is located. If the subject corporation is a foreign entity without a resident agent in the state, it shall commence the proceeding in the county where the registered office of the domestic corporation merged with or whose shares were acquired by the foreign entity was located.
3. The subject corporation shall make all dissenters, whether or not residents of Nevada, whose demands remain unsettled, parties to the proceeding as in an action against their shares. All parties must be served with a copy of the petition. Nonresidents may be served by registered or certified mail or by publication as provided by law.
4. The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced under subsection 2 is plenary and exclusive. The court may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair value. The appraisers have the powers described in the order appointing them, or any amendment thereto. The dissenters are entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings.
F-6
5. Each dissenter who is made a party to the proceeding is entitled to a judgment:
(a) For the amount, if any, by which the court finds the fair value of his shares, plus interest, exceeds the amount paid by the subject corporation; or
(b) For the fair value, plus accrued interest, of his after-acquired shares for which the subject corporation elected to withhold payment pursuant to NRS 92A.470.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS 92A.500 Legal proceeding to determine fair value: Assessment of costs and fees.
1. The court in a proceeding to determine fair value shall determine all of the costs of the proceeding, including the reasonable compensation and expenses of any appraisers appointed by the court. The court shall assess the costs against the subject corporation, except that the court may assess costs against all or some of the dissenters, in amounts the court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds the dissenters acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith in demanding payment.
2. The court may also assess the fees and expenses of the counsel and experts for the respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable:
(a) Against the subject corporation and in favor of all dissenters if the court finds the subject corporation did not substantially comply with the requirements of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive; or
(b) Against either the subject corporation or a dissenter in favor of any other party, if the court finds that the party against whom the fees and expenses are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith with respect to the rights provided by NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.
3. If the court finds that the services of counsel for any dissenter were of substantial benefit to other dissenters similarly situated, and that the fees for those services should not be assessed against the subject corporation, the court may award to those counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts awarded to the dissenters who were benefited.
4. In a proceeding commenced pursuant to NRS 92A.460, the court may assess the costs against the subject corporation, except that the court may assess costs against all or some of the dissenters who are parties to the proceeding, in amounts the court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds that such parties did not act in good faith in instituting the proceeding.
5. This section does not preclude any party in a proceeding commenced pursuant to NRS 92A.460 or 92A.490 from applying the provisions of N.R.C.P. 68 or NRS 17.115.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2092)
F-7
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO
CIMAREX ENERGY CO.
2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), established the Cimarex Energy Co. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of October 1, 2002, and amended the Plan, effective as of March 3, 2003. The Company wishes to amend the Plan as provided below.
Recitals
A. The Plan provides for the grant of equity-based compensation awards, including stock options, restricted stock, and stock units. The Company has granted stock options, restricted, stock, and stock units that are subject to vesting and that, as of the date of this Amendment, have not vested and have not become payable.
B. Section 10.4 of the Plan provides that outstanding awards under the Plan will become fully vested and payable or freely transferable upon the occurrence of a "Change in Control Event" as defined in Section 2.5 of the Plan. The award agreements, including stock options, restricted stock and stock units have incorporated by reference the definition of "Change in Control Event" set forth in Section 2.5 of the Plan.
C. The Company has entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") among the Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. ("MHR") pursuant to which MHR will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Transaction"). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and following the closing of the Transaction, the present stockholders of the Company will own approximately 55% of the Company and it is expected that the current management of the Company will continue to manage the Company.
D. In as much as the current stockholders of the Company will continue to own approximately 55% of the Company and it is expected that the current management of the Company will continue to manage the Company, the Company does not believe that (1) the Transaction will result in a change in the actual operational control of the Company and (2) it was ever intended that a transaction like the Transaction would result in accelerated vesting of stock options granted under the Plan, the accelerated vesting and payout of stock units granted under the Plan, or the accelerated vesting and free transferability of restricted stock granted under the Plan.
E. Section 10.1 provides that the Company's Board of Directors can amend the Plan at any time. Section 10.5 provides that the Company may amend outstanding awards under the Plan; provided that if the amendment is adverse to the holder of the award, the amendment will not be effective without the holder's consent.
F. Some of the holders of the outstanding options, units and restricted stock have waived any rights they may have to accelerated vesting of their options, accelerated vesting and payment of their units, or accelerated vesting and free transferability of their restricted stock if the Transaction closes and have consented to the amendment of the definition of "Change in Control Event" to provide that the Transaction will not be deemed to be a Change in Control Event.
G. As a part of the consideration for the waivers and consents given by the holders of options, units and restricted stock, the Company has agreed to amend the option agreements, unit agreements and restricted stock agreements to provide for full vesting of the options, full vesting and payment of units and full vesting and free transferability of restricted stock if the holder dies or terminates employment on account of "disability" as defined in the Plan. A recent change in the law has changed the definition of "disability" that applies for these purposes. The Company wishes to amend the
G-1
definition of "disability" to comply with the change in the law and some of the holders of option, units and restricted stock have consented to the amendment.
H. The Company's Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan.
Amendment
1. Section 1.3 shall be amended in its entirety as follows:
SECTION 1.3 Shares Subject to the Plan. Subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan, the number of shares of common stock reserved for Awards under the Plan is increased from seven million (7,000,000) to twelve million seven hundred thousand (12,700,000).
2. Section 2.1 shall be amended by the addition of a new subsection (v) at the end to provide as follows:
(v) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the closing of the transaction contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. (the "Transaction") shall not be deemed to the be a "Change in Control Event" for purposes of Section 10.4 of this Plan.
3. Section 4.1 shall be amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
SECTION 4.1 Committee to Grant Awards. The Committee may, from time to time, grant Awards to one or more Participants, provided, however, that:
(i) Subject to Article IX, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock made subject to the Award of Options to any Participant in any calendar year may not exceed one million (1,000,000).
(ii) Subject to Article IX, in no event shall more than one million (1,000,000) (14%) of the seven million (7,000,000) shares initially subject to the Plan be awarded to Participants as Restricted Stock Awards. Up to one-half of the five million seven hundred thousand (5,700,000) shares added to the Plan upon approval of the stockholders at the meeting held on , 2005, may be awarded to Participants as Restricted Stock Awards. The limits referred to in this Section 4.1(ii) shall be referred to as the Restricted Stock Award Limit.
(iii) Any shares of Common Stock related to Awards that terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of shares of Common Stock or are exchanged in the Committee's discretion for Awards not involving Common Stock, and any shares of Common Stock withheld for the payment of taxes pursuant to Section 9.3 or received by the Company as payment of the exercise price of an Option shall be available again for grant under the Plan; provided, however, that no more than twelve million seven hundred thousand (12,700,000) shares of Common Stock may be issued under Incentive Stock Options. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the five million seven hundred thousand (5,700,000) shares (the "2005 Additional Share Reserve") added upon approval of the stockholders at the meeting held on , 2005, a grant of one share as a Restricted Stock Award or a Stock Unit shall reduce the 2005 Additional Share Reserve by two shares and a grant of one share pursuant to an Option shall reduce the 2005 Additional Share Reserve by one share.
(iv) Common Stock delivered by the Company in payment of any Award under the Plan may be authorized and unissued Common Stock or Common Stock held in the treasury of the Company.
G-2
(v) The Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine the manner in which fractional shares arising under the Plan shall be treated.
(vi) Separate certificates representing Common Stock delivered to a Participant upon the exercise of any Option will be issued to such Participant.
4. Section 10.2 shall be amended by the deletion of the parenthetical in the first sentence that reads "(as defined in Section 22(e) of the Code)" and by the addition of the following at the end:
The Grantee shall be disabled if the Grantee
(i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or
(ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than 3 months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company.
5. The Amendments in section 2 and section 4 shall be effective only if the Transaction closes.
6. The Amendments in section 2 and section 4 shall apply only to Participants who have consented to the amendments to the Plan by executing and not revoking a written waiver and amendment or other agreement with the Company.
7. The Amendments in section 1 and section 3 shall become effective upon approval by the Company's stockholders at the meeting scheduled for , 2005.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been signed this day of , 2005 to be effective as provided above.
| CIMAREX ENERGY CO. | |||||
By: |
|||||
| Name: | F. H. Merelli | ||||
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President | ||||
G-3