UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Amendment No. 1 to

For the transition period from                                        to                                        

Commission File Number 001-11919

TeleTech Holdings, Inc.

9197 South Peoria Street
Englewood, Colorado 80112
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 397-8100

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES þ NO o

There were 74,592,687 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share outstanding as of August 1, 2004.

Explanatory Note

          This quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A is being filed for the purpose of amending the Company’s consolidated financial statements to provide users of our financial information with additional information relative to adjustments recorded during the first and second quarters of 2004 and 2003 that related to prior periods and an adjustment the Company did not record during the first and second quarters of 2004 and 2003. During December 2004, the Company determined that it was appropriate to restate previously issued consolidated financial statements to record these adjustments. The restated consolidated financial statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are reflected in this Form 10-Q/A.

          The restatement is primarily a result of accounting adjustments that pertain to prior periods, the majority of which were disclosed in Item 9A in the original filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a result of that restatement, certain additional adjustments originally recorded during the first quarter of 2004 were recorded in 2003. Those adjustments have been recorded into the proper periods and decreased net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 by approximately $475,000. In addition, subsequent to filing the 2003 Form 10-K, the Company identified a contract acquisition cost and related liability that became the right and obligation of the Company during 2002; the Company recorded the contract acquisition cost and related liability, as well as recorded the related amortization of the asset and decretion of the liability from inception of the obligation forward, increasing net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 by approximately $182,000 each and increasing net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 by approximately $364,000 each. Also, we determined there was an account reconciliation error, resulting in a $92,000 increase to net income. The impact of the above adjustments and certain tax adjustments increased income tax expense in the amount of $1.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and $1.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003. The impact of the above adjustments increased income tax expense during the three months ended June 30, 2004 by $22,000 and $289,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004.

          The effect of the restatement on net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was an increase in net income of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The effect of the restatement on net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was an increase in net income of $2.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

          This Form 10-Q/A amends and restates Items 1 and 2 contained in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 4, 2004, as required to reflect the restatement, and includes currently dated certifications pursuant to the rules of the SEC. The foregoing items have not been updated to reflect other events occurring after the filing of the original Form 10-Q, or to modify those disclosures affected by subsequent events, except for those disclosures provided in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q/A. All other information contained herein was included in the original Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC on August 4, 2004, speaks only as of such date and has not been amended or updated hereby. All referenced amounts in this Form 10-Q/A for prior periods and prior period comparisons reflect the balances and amounts on a restated basis.

          All information contained in this Form 10-Q/A is subject to updating and supplementing as provided in our reports filed with the SEC subsequent to the date of the original filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result, we recommend that this Form 10-Q/A be read in conjunction with all other periodic and current reports of the Company filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), after the filing of the original Form 10-Q, including without limitation the information described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q/A and the information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q/A for the quarters ended September 30, 2004, as filed on the date hereof.

2

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

3

Item 1.

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated balance sheets.

4

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(1) OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Overview

     TeleTech Holdings, Inc. (“TeleTech” or the “Company”) serves its clients through two primary businesses: (i) Customer Management Services, which provides customer management and business process outsourcing solutions for a variety of industries via call centers (“customer management centers”, or “CMCs”) in the United States, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, the Philippines, Scotland, Singapore, and Spain (“Customer Care”); and (ii) Database Marketing and Consulting, which provides outsourced database management, direct marketing and related customer retention services for automotive dealerships and manufacturers in North America.

Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring entries) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2004, and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Restatement

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been restated for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The restatement is discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.

Stock Option Accounting

The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options including Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosures”. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options is generally equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense is recognized. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), establishes an alternative method of expense recognition for stock-based compensation awards to employees based on fair values. The Company elected not to adopt SFAS 123 for expense recognition purposes.

     The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands except per share amounts):

7

(2) SEGMENT INFORMATION

     The Company classifies its business activities into three segments: North American Customer Care, International Customer Care, and Database Marketing and Consulting. These segments are consistent with the Company’s management of the business and reflect its internal financial reporting structure and operating focus. North American and International Customer Care provide comprehensive customer management services. North American Customer Care consists of customer management services provided to United States’ and Canadian clients while International Customer Care consists of all other countries. Database Marketing and Consulting provides outsourced database management, direct marketing and related customer retention services for automobile dealerships and manufacturers. All intercompany transactions between the reported segments for the periods presented have been eliminated.

     It is a Company strategy to garner additional business through the lower cost opportunities offered by certain international countries. Accordingly, the Company provides services to certain U.S. clients from CMCs in Canada, India, Argentina, Mexico and the Philippines. Under this arrangement, while the U.S. subsidiary invoices and collects from the end client, the U.S. subsidiary also enters into a contract with the foreign subsidiary to reimburse the foreign subsidiary for their costs plus a reasonable profit. As a result, a portion of the profits from these client contracts is recorded in the U.S. while a portion is recorded in the foreign location. For U.S. clients being serviced from Canadian locations, India and the Philippines, which represent the majority of these arrangements, the profits all remain within the North American Customer Care segment. For U.S. clients being serviced from other countries, a portion of the profits is reflected in the International Customer Care segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of income from operations in the International Customer Care segment were generated from these arrangements. There are also situations where certain foreign subsidiaries will contract with other foreign subsidiaries to service client contracts. In these situations, while the profits are partially recorded in each country, on a segment basis they are all reflected in the International Customer Care segment.

     In January 2004, the Company adopted the practice of allocating corporate operating expenses to segments based upon estimates of usage of corporate resources through the following methods: an hourly rate applied to services utilized, consolidated full-time equivalents, consolidated headcount, or the segments’ respective pro rata percentage of consolidated costs of services. In prior periods, corporate operating expenses were allocated to segments based upon the segments’ respective pro rata percentage of consolidated revenue. The information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 has been restated to reflect this change.

8

     The following table reflects revenue based on the geographic location in which the services are provided:

(3) COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

     The Company’s comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was as follows:

     At June 30, 2004, accumulated comprehensive loss consisted of ($16.8) million and $0.2 million of foreign currency translation adjustments and derivatives valuation, respectively. At December 31, 2003, accumulated comprehensive loss consisted of ($9.3) million and $2.6 million of foreign currency translation adjustments and derivatives valuation, respectively.

(4) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

     Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the Company’s net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The impact of any potentially dilutive securities is excluded. Diluted earnings per share are computed by

9

dividing the Company’s net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:

     For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, 5.1 million and 4.3 million options, respectively, to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, 10.2 million and 9.6 million options, respectively, to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. The Company has also excluded the impact of outstanding warrants, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive for all periods presented.

(5) DEBT

     In April 2004, the Company implemented a plan to reduce debt and the associated interest costs along with improving financial flexibility by re-aligning the Company’s capital structure to better support the Company’s business plans and to benefit from the current lower interest rate environment (the “Refinancing”). This strategy entailed two components. First, to refinance the then existing revolving line of credit (“Revolver”) with a new revolving Credit Facility (“Credit Facility”) that provides more financial and operational flexibility. Second, to de-leverage the balance sheet by prepaying the high cost $75.0 million of senior notes (“Senior Notes”).

     On May 5, 2004, the Company completed the first stage by structuring a new secured Credit Facility with a financial institution, and subsequently syndicating it to a group of banks. The amount of the Credit Facility permits the Company to borrow up to $100 million with an option to increase the size of the facility to a maximum of $150 million (subject to approval by the lenders at any time up to 90 days prior to the termination of the agreement). The $39.0 million in borrowings under the former Revolver were refinanced under the Credit Facility.

     The Credit Facility, which includes certain customary financial covenants, may be used for general corporate purposes, including refinancing of debt, working capital, and acquisition financing. The Credit Facility accrues interest at a rate based on either (1) the Prime Rate, defined as the higher of the lender’s prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, or (2) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), at the Company’s option. The interest rate will vary based on the Company’s leverage ratio as defined in the Credit Facility agreement. At June 30, 2004, the blended interest rate was 3.1% per annum. In addition, a commitment fee will be charged on a quarterly basis on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.

     The Credit Facility matures May 4, 2007; however, the Company may request a one-year extension of the maturity date, subject to approval by the lenders. The Credit Facility is secured by 100% of the Company’s domestic accounts receivable and a pledge of 65% of capital stock of all the Company’s material foreign subsidiaries, as defined in the agreement.

     On June 16, 2004, the Company completed the second stage of the plan by de-leveraging the balance sheet through the prepayment of $75 million in outstanding obligations under the Senior Notes. As a result, the Company was required to pay an additional $6.4 million under a make-whole provision (which, along with a $1.2 million non-cash write-off of deferred costs on the former Revolver and Senior Notes, was recorded as a charge to debt restructuring charges). The company satisfied the Senior Notes’ principal and make-whole obligations with a combination of cash and incremental borrowings under the Credit Facility, representing $56.4 million and $25.0 million, respectively. At June 30, 2004, the Company had $64.2 million in borrowings under the new Credit Facility.

10

(6) GRANT ADVANCES

     From time to time, the Company has received grants from local or state governments as an incentive to locate CMCs in their jurisdictions. The Company’s policy is to account for grant monies received as deferred income and recognize into income (as a reduction of either depreciation expense or other income) over the life of the grant as it achieves milestones set forth in the grant. Except for the grant discussed below, the Company generally does not receive funding under the grants until it has met the required milestones.

     In 2001, the Company received a grant from Invest Northern Ireland, formally known as the Industrial Development Board (“IDB”) of Northern Ireland (the “IDB Grant”). Pursuant to the IDB Grant, the Company received approximately $11.9 million in advance of achieving the required milestones. The advance was to be earned by achieving certain milestones related to hiring and retaining employees, capital expenditures and purchasing the facility. As of December 31, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with certain components of the IDB Grant; therefore, the advance was classified as current on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. In March 2004, the Company finalized negotiations on the terms of the IDB Grant so that the milestones could more realistically be achieved. In order to induce the IDB to restructure the terms of the IDB Grant, the Company agreed to repay $5.8 million of the advanced funds and $1.2 million of back rent in March 2004. As of June 30, 2004, approximately $7.3 million was outstanding under the IDB Grant and if the Company has not met all of the required milestones, the unearned portion of the grant becomes payable in 2011. The balance is classified as long-term as of June 30, 2004 as the Company believes it will meet the required milestones.

(7) INCOME TAXES

     The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of transactions that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. When circumstances warrant, the Company assesses the likelihood that its net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be recovered from future projected taxable income. Management judgment has been used in forecasting future taxable income.

     Based upon assessments of recoverability of its deferred tax assets made in prior periods, the Company maintained a valuation allowance which aggregates to $29.6 million as of June 30, 2004 principally related to its U.S., Spain, Brazil and Argentina tax jurisdictions. The Company has approximately $8.3 million of net deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2004 related to certain international countries whose recoverability is dependent upon anticipated future profitability. The Company believes the net deferred tax asset for U.S. operations of approximately $1.6 million as of June 30, 2004, all related to 2004 operations, is recoverable based upon current estimates of future taxable income.

     Tax valuation allowances did not have a significant impact on the provision for income taxes prior to the second quarter of 2003, at which time a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of approximately $23.7 million was established. Accordingly, the effective tax rate of 39%, when excluding the valuation allowance, reported for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 represented the customary relationship between income tax expense and pre-tax accounting income. As of June 30, 2004, the valuation allowance balance is $29.6 million and accordingly, tax valuation allowances have had a material impact on the effective tax rate for the quarter and six-months ended June 30, 2004 as shown below:

11

     For tax jurisdictions where the Company has recorded tax valuation allowances, the Company generally does not recognize the benefit of operating losses. However, the Company does recognize current state income and franchise taxes, federal income taxes, foreign withholding tax related to dividends received from foreign corporations and minimum taxes imposed on capital or equity. As such, the Company recorded income tax expense for these jurisdictions even though the jurisdictions reported an operating loss. For tax jurisdictions without valuation allowances, the effective tax rate represents the estimated tax rate in these jurisdictions, which range from 17% to 39%. In addition, the Company has not recognized any benefit that it might realize from tax refunds arising from amended filing positions being pursued.

(8) DERIVATIVES

     The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 133 requires every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) to be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in the fair value of qualifying hedges recorded in other comprehensive income. SFAS 133 requires that changes in a derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative’s gains and losses to offset the related results of the hedged item and requires that a Company must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment. Based on the criteria established by SFAS 133, all of the Company’s hedges consisting of an interest rate swap, foreign currency options and forward exchange contracts are deemed effective. While the Company expects that its derivative instruments will continue to meet the conditions for hedge accounting, if the hedges did not qualify as highly effective or if the Company did not believe that forecasted transactions would occur, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges would be reflected in earnings. The Company does not believe it is exposed to more than a nominal amount of credit risk in its hedging activities, as the counter parties are established, well-capitalized financial institutions.

     At June 30, 2004, the company had an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge. The Company had a synthetic lease for its headquarters building for which the required lease payments were variable based on LIBOR. In February 2003, the synthetic lease was terminated when the Company purchased the corporate headquarters building, including furniture and fixtures, for the contractual price in the synthetic lease of $38.2 million using proceeds from the Revolver. The repayment terms under the Revolver were identical to that of the synthetic lease. On December 12, 2000, the Company entered into an interest rate swap in which the Company receives LIBOR and pays fixed rate interest of 6.20%. The swap agreement has a notional amount of approximately $38.2 million and has a six-year term. The purchase of the corporate headquarters building did not cause a termination of the designation of the interest rate swap as a hedge because at inception, the Company designated the swap as a hedge of the floating LIBOR which it paid under the Revolver. In May 2004, the Company refinanced the Revolver under a new Credit Facility (see Note 5). Because the interest rate terms of the $38.2 million borrowings under the Credit Facility are identical to that of the former Revolver, the Company re-designated the swap as a cash flow hedge of the Credit Facility.

     As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had a derivative liability associated with this swap of approximately $2.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively, which is reflected in Other Liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In the event that the Company wanted to terminate the swap, the above mentioned liability would have to be settled with cash and a charge to operations recorded either immediately (if occurs simultaneously with the extinguishment of the Credit Facility) or over the remaining life of the Credit Facility (if the Credit Facility remains in place). Likewise, if the Company repaid the associated Credit Facility balance, the balance recor0ded in other comprehensive loss related to the swap would be recorded over the remaining life of the Credit Facility.

     The Company’s subsidiaries in Canada, Argentina, Mexico and the Philippines have a functional currency in the Canadian dollar, Argentinean Peso, Mexican Peso and Philippines Peso, respectively. The functional currency is used to pay labor and other operating costs. However, the subsidiaries have customer contracts where they are paid in U.S. dollars for which the Company has contracted with several commercial banks, at no material cost, to acquire, under forward exchange contracts and options, the functional currency at a fixed price in U.S. dollars to hedge its foreign currency risk. As of June 30, 2004, and the notional amount of those contracts is summarized as follows (in millions):

12

     During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded gains of $2.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for settled forward contracts, which are recorded in Costs of Services in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had derivative assets of $3.3 million and $8.9 million, respectively, associated with foreign exchange contracts consisting of the fair market value of forward exchange contracts and options outstanding. Included in these derivative assets are premiums paid by the Company as part of obtaining the foreign exchange option contracts. The cost of these premiums is amortized into earnings ratably over the term of the underlying contract.

(9) RESTRUCTURING CHARGES AND IMPAIRMENT LOSSES

     During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company recognized approximately $2.4 million of termination benefits for approximately 610 employees, across all three segments.

     During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the North American Customer Care segment recorded restructuring charges of approximately $0.9 million related to the closure of its Kansas City, Kansas facility being used to service the United States Postal Services (“USPS”). These charges consisted of a fee paid to the landlord for the early termination of the lease along with an accrual for a grant from the State of Kansas that will have to be repaid. The repayment amount is currently under negotiation and the amount accrued represents management’s best estimate of what will be paid. Additionally, the North American Customer Care segment also recorded approximately $0.4 million for the termination of 591 employees related to the shut down of a managed center in Atlanta, Georgia in March 2003. The charges for the closure of Kansas City and Atlanta were partially offset by the reversal of approximately $1.2 million of excess accruals related to 2002 restructurings.

     During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the International Customer Care segment recorded restructuring charges of approximately $1.0 million for severance and other termination benefits related to a reduction in force of approximately 120 administrative employees in Mexico.

     A rollforward of the activity in restructuring accruals is as follows:

     The restructuring accrual is included in Other Accrued Expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

     During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Company determined that its CMC in Glasgow would not generate sufficient undiscounted cash flows to recover the net book value of its assets. As a result, the Company’s International Customer Care segment recorded a charge of approximately $2.6 million to reduce the net book value of this long-lived asset to its estimated fair value.

     During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the North American Customer Care segment recorded an impairment loss of approximately $4.0 million to reduce the net book value of the long-lived assets of its Kansas City customer management center to their fair market value.

13

     During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the International Customer Care segment recorded an impairment loss of $3.0 million to reduce the net book value of the long-lived assets of its Mexico City customer management center to their fair market value.

(10) CONTINGENCIES

     Legal Proceedings. From time to time, the Company may be involved in claims or lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business. Accruals for claims or lawsuits have been provided for to the extent that losses are deemed probable and estimable. Although the ultimate outcome of these claims or lawsuits cannot be ascertained, on the basis of present information and advice received from counsel, the Company accrues for the estimated minimum probable loss for such claims on lawsuits as the liability. Management believes that the disposition or ultimate determination of all such claims or lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

     Sales and Use Taxes. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had accrued a liability of $3.1 million for potential sales and use tax liabilities of its Database Marketing and Consulting segment. Based upon favorable resolutions with several states, the Company has reduced the liability by approximately $2.0 million and as of June 30, 2004 the Company has a remaining liability of $1.1 million for sales and use taxes.

     During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, management completed its review to determine the applicability of sales and or use taxes to its North American Customer Care segment and, based upon that review, established a liability of approximately $0.5 million.

     Guarantees. The Company’s Credit Facility is guaranteed by all of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries. An operating lease agreement of a subsidiary with $2.2 million remaining to be paid to a bank as of June 30, 2004 is guaranteed by another subsidiary.

     Letters of credit. At June 30, 2004 outstanding letters of credit totaled approximately $13.0 million, which primarily guarantees workers’ compensation, other insurance related obligations and facility leases.

(11) RESTATEMENT

     The Company has determined that restatement of the financial statements presented in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 is appropriate. As discussed in Item 9A of the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, $9.7 million of adjustments originally recorded during 2003 related to prior periods. Additionally certain adjustments originally recorded during the first quarter of 2004 were recorded in 2003. Those adjustments were required to be reversed in the first quarter of 2004. On a combined basis they decreased net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 by approximately $475,000. Further, the Company recorded a contract acquisition cost and related liability that became the right and obligation of the Company during 2002; and the Company recorded the amortization of the contract acquisition cost asset and the decretion of the liability, increasing net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 by approximately $182,000. The Company also determined that it was not properly accounting for scheduled rent escalations at most of its locations. The impact of this adjustment was to decrease rent expense by $85,000 and $170,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and to increase rent expense by $55,000 and $110,000 during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively. Finally the Company identified an account reconciliation error, resulting in a $92,000 increase to net income during the three and six month periods ended.

     The consolidated financial data set forth below presents our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, on a comparative basis showing the amounts as previously reported and as restated (dollars in thousands).

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

14

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

15

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

16

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

     The table below presents the impact of the changes by major category.

17

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

     This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The projections and statements contained in these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. All statements not based on historical fact are forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. In accordance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, following are important factors that could cause TeleTech’s and its subsidiaries’ actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the following: under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the revenues, expenses, and profits associated with the launch of new client agreements may be expensed up front or deferred over the life of the client contract, and, accordingly, the profitability of these agreements may be disproportionately skewed toward later periods; the possibility of the company’s Database Marketing and Consulting segment not returning to historic levels of profitability; greater than anticipated competition in the customer care market, causing adverse pricing and more stringent contractual terms; risks associated with losing or not renewing significant client relationships, or early termination of a client agreement; the company’s ability to close new business in 2004 and fill excess capacity; consumers’ concerns or adverse publicity regarding the products of the company’s clients; higher than anticipated start-up costs or lead times associated with new ventures or business in new markets; execution risks associated with performance-based pricing metrics in certain client agreements; execution risks associated with achieving targeted annualized cost reductions; the company’s ability to find cost effective locations, obtain favorable lease terms, and build or retrofit facilities in a timely and economic manner; risks associated with attracting and retaining cost-effective labor at the company’s customer management centers; the possibility of additional asset impairments and restructuring charges; risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates; economic or political changes affecting the countries in which the company operates; changes in accounting policies and practices promulgated by standard setting bodies; and, new legislation or government regulation that impacts the customer care industry. Readers should review the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These SEC filings describe in greater detail the items discussed above along with other important factors that may impact the company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The Company assumes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements

          On December 30, 2004, we announced that our Audit Committee met and agreed with management’s recommendation that we restate our condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. We are filing this Form 10-Q/A in conjunction with that restatement to allow comparability between the quarterly financial statements for 2004 and the restated quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements for 2003. In addition, we identified certain adjustments to the 2004 condensed consolidated financial statements that were appropriate.

          The restatement is primarily a result of a comprehensive review of our condensed consolidated financial statements. We identified adjustments to our amortization of contract acquisition costs, lease expense and an error in account reconciliation.

          Except as updated to reflect the restatement, the discussion below, including without limitation any forward-looking information contained therein, speaks only as of the initial filing date of August 4, 2004. We recommend that you read the discussion below in conjunction with all other periodic and current reports we filed under the Exchange Act after the filing of the original Form 10-Q, including without limitation the information described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q/A.

The statements contained in Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based on the restated Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The effects of the restatement are presented in Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

18

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

     We serve our clients through two primary businesses: (i) Customer Management Services, which provides outsourced customer support and marketing services for a variety of industries via call centers (“customer management centers”, or “CMCs”) throughout the world; and (ii) Database Marketing and Consulting. We separate our Customer Management Services business into two segments consistent with our management of the business, which generally reflects the internal financial reporting structure and operating focus. North American Customer Care consists of customer management services provided to United States, and Canadian clients while International Customer Care consists of clients in all other countries. Database Marketing and Consulting provides outsourced database management, direct marketing and related customer retention services for automobile dealerships and manufacturers. Segment accounting policies are the same as those used in the condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding preparation of segment information.

Customer Management Services

     The Customer Management Services segment generates revenue based primarily on the amount of time our representatives devote to a client’s program. We primarily focus on large global corporations in the following industries: automotive, communications and media, financial services, government, healthcare, logistics, retail, technology and travel. Revenue is recognized as services are provided. The majority of our revenue is from multi-year contracts. However, we do provide some programs on a short-term basis and our operations outside of North America are characterized by shorter-term contracts. Additionally, we typically experience client attrition of approximately 10% to 15% of our revenue each year. Our invoice terms with the majority of our customers are 30 days, excluding longer terms in Europe and prepay arrangements.

     We compete primarily with the in-house customer management operations of our current and potential clients. We also compete with certain companies that provide customer management services on an outsourced basis. Over the last several years, the global economy has had a negative impact on the customer care management market. More specifically, sales cycles have lengthened, competition has increased, and contract values have been reduced.

     The short-term focus of management is to increase revenue by:

     Our ability to enter into new multi-year contracts, particularly large complex opportunities, is dependent upon the macroeconomic environment in general and the specific industry environments in which our customers are operating. A weakening of the U.S. and/or global economy could further lengthen sales cycles or cause delays in closing new business opportunities.

     Our profitability is, among other factors, influenced by our ability to increase capacity utilization in our CMCs, the number of new or expanded programs garnered during a period, our performance on contracts with bonus and or penalty clauses and our success at managing personnel turnover and employee costs. Managing our costs is critical since we continue to see pricing pressure within our industry. The pricing pressures have been exacerbated by excess capacity and the rapid growth of offshore labor.

     As mentioned above, our profitability is influenced by the number of new or expanded client programs. As required by our adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”) for contracts entered into after July 1, 2003 (see “Critical Accounting Policies” for further discussion), in the event that a client is billed separately for direct start-up costs, the associated revenue and costs are deferred and recognized straight-line over the life of the contract. In the event that a client is not billed separately for direct start-up costs, then those start-up costs are expensed when incurred.

     The following is a summary of the impact of the adoption of EITF 00-21 on the three and six-months ended June 30, 2004 (in thousands):

19

     Our industry is very labor-intensive and the majority of our operating costs relate to wages, costs of employee benefits and employment taxes. An improvement in the local or global economies where our CMCs are located could lead to increased labor-related costs. To address these risks, we strive to include cost of living adjustments in our contracts and for clients to absorb a portion of turnover. In addition, our industry experiences high personnel turnover, and the length of training required to implement new programs continues to increase due to increased complexities of our clients’ programs. This may create challenges if we obtain several significant new clients or implement several new, large-scale programs, and need to recruit, hire and train qualified personnel at an accelerated rate.

     Our success in improving our profitability will depend on successful execution of our comprehensive business plan, and will require taking the following steps:

Database Marketing and Consulting

     The Database Marketing and Consulting segment has contracts with over 6,000 automobile dealers representing 27 different brand names. These contracts generally have terms ranging from twelve to twenty-four months. For a few major automotive manufacturers, the automotive manufacturer collects from the individual automobile dealers on our behalf. Our average collection period is 30 days.

     A majority of revenue from this segment is generated utilizing a database and contact engine to promote the service business of automotive dealership customers (both current and potential) using targeted marketing solutions through the “web”, email, phone or mail. This segment has historically experienced year-over-year revenue growth through expansion to additional automobile dealers along with additional products. As previously forecasted, due to a combination of factors, both internal and external (such as client renewals and new product launch costs), our income from operations declined materially during the first six months of 2004 as compared to 2003 as shown on page 22 (excluding the impact of changes in use tax accruals discussed on page 27 under Selling, General and Administrative).

     We plan to focus on the following in 2004:

Overall

     As shown in the Financial Comparison on page 26, we believe we have been successful in improving income from operations; see “Net increase to income from operations excluding items separately identified below” in the table. The increase reflected in that table is attributable to a variety of factors such as our multi-phased cost reduction plan, transitioning work on certain clients to lower cost operating centers, and actions taken to improve profit margins or eliminate unprofitable clients.

20

     We implemented a $40 million cost reduction plan one year ago to address known changes in our business and, in particular, the decline in revenue and operating income due to the minimum commitments discussed in Client Concentrations on page 33. We believe this plan enabled us to operate profitably during the first and second quarter of 2004; however, the severance aspect of this plan impacted the first quarter’s operating results by approximately $1.6 million pre-tax. We are implementing the second phase of our profit improvement plan, which we anticipate to result in an additional $20 million in annualized savings to be fully realized in 2005. These improvements are expected to be achieved primarily through cost savings in the areas of CMC operations, telecommunications, professional fees, insurance and reduced future interest expense associated with our debt reduction plan.

     Beginning in the third quarter 2004, we expect interest expense to decrease because the Senior Notes have been repaid, which is estimated to result in annualized net, pre-tax interest expense savings of approximately $5 million per year. The Refinancing resulted in a pre-tax charge in the second quarter of $7.6 million, of which approximately $6.4 million is a cash charge related to the Senior Notes make-whole payment discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources below and the remaining $1.2 million is a non-cash charge to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs. We expect to recoup the $7.6 million up-front charge related to terminating the Senior Notes from the estimated future savings associated from reduced future interest expense.

Critical Accounting Policies

     We have identified the policies below as critical to our business and results of operations. For further discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Our reported results are impacted by the application of the following accounting policies, certain of which require management to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact quarterly or annual results of operations. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.

     For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.

     Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue at the time services are performed. Our Customer Management Services business recognizes revenue under production rate and performance-based models, which are:

     Production Rate—Revenue is recognized based on the billable hours or minutes of each CSR, as defined in the client contract. The rate per billable hour or minute is based on a predetermined contractual rate, as agreed in the underlying contract. This contractual rate can fluctuate based on our performance against certain pre-determined criteria related to quality and performance.

     Performance-based—Under performance-based arrangements, we are paid by our clients based on achievement of certain levels of sales or other client-determined criteria specified in the client contract. We recognize performance-based revenue by measuring our actual results against the performance criteria specified in the contracts. Amounts collected from clients prior to the performance of services are recorded as deferred revenue.

     Certain programs provide for penalties due to non-compliance with certain obligations as defined in a client contract and also to pay us bonuses when certain criteria are exceeded. Such penalties or bonuses are recorded as a reduction or increase to revenue as incurred. We have certain contracts that are billed in advance and, accordingly, amounts billed but not earned under these contracts are excluded from revenue and included in customer advances and deferred income.

     Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” (“SFAS 109”) which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of transactions that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. When circumstances warrant, we assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be recovered from future projected taxable income. Management judgment has been used in forecasting future taxable income.

     For succeeding quarters, our effective tax rate will be affected by many factors including (i) the amount and placement of new business into tax jurisdictions with valuation allowances and without valuation allowances and (ii) the impact of tax refunds, if any, that we might realize from tax refunds arising from various tax planning strategies we are pursuing.

     Goodwill. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually from reporting units one level below the segment level. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The impairment, if any, is measured based on the

21

estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Fair value can be determined based on discounted cash flows, comparable sales or valuations of other similar businesses. Our policy is to test goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, unless an indicator of impairment arises during an intervening quarter.

     The most significant assumptions used in this analysis are those made in estimating future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we generally use the financial assumptions in our internal forecasting model such as projected capacity utilization, projected changes in the prices we charge for our services and projected labor costs. We then use a discount rate we consider appropriate for the country where the business unit is providing services. If future actual results differ from the assumptions used in performing the impairment test, the fair value of the reporting units may be significantly lower, causing the carrying value to exceed the fair value and indicating an impairment had occurred. Based on the analysis performed in the fourth quarter of 2003, there was no impairment of the goodwill balance of $30.2 million. For a sensitivity analysis, if projected revenue used in the analysis of goodwill was 10% less than forecast (the projections assumed revenue growth rates ranging from 10% to 26% per annum over a three-year period), there would still be no impairment to goodwill.

     Restructuring Liability. We routinely assess the profitability and utilization of our CMCs. We have in the past and may again in the future, elect to close under-performing centers and make reductions in force, incur a loss, which has been and may in the future be material, to enhance future profitability. We follow SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which specifies that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred instead of upon commitment to a plan.

     A significant assumption used in determining the amount of estimated liability for closing CMCs is the estimated liability for future lease payments on vacant centers, which we determine based on a third party broker’s assessment of our ability to successfully negotiate early termination agreements with landlords and/or our ability to sublease the premises. If our assumptions regarding early termination and the timing and amounts of anticipated sublease payments prove to be inaccurate, we may be required to record additional losses, or conversely, a future gain, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for an analysis of activity in the restructuring liability reserve.

     Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. During the year, we evaluate the carrying value of our individual CMCs in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” to evaluate whether future operating results are sufficient to recover the carrying costs of these long-lived assets. When the operating results of a center have reasonably progressed to a point making it likely that the site will continue to sustain losses in the future, or there is a current expectation that a CMC will be closed or otherwise disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life, we select the center for further review.

     For a CMC selected for further review, we estimate the probability-weighted future cash flows from operating the center over its useful life. Significant judgment is involved in projecting future capacity utilization, pricing of services, labor costs and the estimated useful life of the center. Additionally, we do not test CMCs that have been operated for less than two years or those centers that have been impaired within the past two years (the “Two Year Rule”) because we believe a sufficient period of time is needed to establish market presence and build a customer base for such new or modified centers in order to adequately assess recoverability. However, such centers are nonetheless evaluated in case other factors would indicate an impairment in value. For recently impaired centers, we write the assets down to estimated fair market value. If the assumptions used in performing the impairment test prove insufficient, the fair value estimate of the CMCs may be significantly lower, thereby causing the carrying value to exceed fair value and indicating an impairment has occurred.

     A sensitivity analysis of the impairment that would arise assuming that future revenue was 10% less than projected in the probability-weighted projection scenarios (that had annual revenue growth rates ranging from negative to 73% based on management expectations and available capacity) and the assumed margins were held constant, is summarized below (dollars in thousands):

22

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable. Each quarter, management reviews the receivables on an account-by-account basis and assigns a probability of collection. Management judgment is used in assessing the probability of collection. Factors considered in making this judgment are the age of the identified receivable, client financial wherewithal, previous client history and any recent communications with the client.

23

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Review

     The following table is presented to facilitate Management’s Discussion and Analysis (dollars in thousands):